WEBVTT - The Gerasene Demoniac

0:00:06.240 --> 0:00:12.119
<v Speaker 1>Come out of the man thou let spirit. What is

0:00:12.200 --> 0:00:19.040
<v Speaker 1>thy name? My name is Legion, because yawnny, and he

0:00:19.160 --> 0:00:21.520
<v Speaker 1>besought him much that he would not send them away

0:00:21.560 --> 0:00:25.200
<v Speaker 1>out of the country. Now there was there nigh unto

0:00:25.239 --> 0:00:28.840
<v Speaker 1>the mountains, a great herd of swine feeting, and all

0:00:29.000 --> 0:00:33.480
<v Speaker 1>the devils besought him, saying, sitting us among the peaks,

0:00:34.040 --> 0:00:38.720
<v Speaker 1>allow us to go into them, and forthwith Jesus gave

0:00:38.800 --> 0:00:42.200
<v Speaker 1>them leave, and the unclean spirits went out and entered

0:00:42.240 --> 0:00:45.440
<v Speaker 1>into the swine, and the herd ran violently down a

0:00:45.520 --> 0:00:48.720
<v Speaker 1>steep place into the sea, and were choked from the sea.

0:01:05.760 --> 0:01:07.720
<v Speaker 1>Welcome Stuff to Blow your Mind. A production of I

0:01:07.760 --> 0:01:16.680
<v Speaker 1>Heart Radios How Stuff Works. Hey, you welcome to Stuff

0:01:16.720 --> 0:01:18.960
<v Speaker 1>to blow your Mind. My name is Robert Lamb and

0:01:19.040 --> 0:01:21.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm Joe McCormick. And it's still October, so of course

0:01:21.880 --> 0:01:26.800
<v Speaker 1>we're letting out a great demonic oink today, Robert, I know. So,

0:01:26.800 --> 0:01:29.560
<v Speaker 1>so you wanted to talk about a demoniac today. And

0:01:29.640 --> 0:01:32.720
<v Speaker 1>this was a very exciting idea to me because this

0:01:32.840 --> 0:01:36.200
<v Speaker 1>story in the Bible about the garrison or gathering demoniac

0:01:36.319 --> 0:01:39.160
<v Speaker 1>has long been one of my favorites, but also because

0:01:39.200 --> 0:01:42.240
<v Speaker 1>it's a story that concerns possessed swine. I think it

0:01:42.240 --> 0:01:47.000
<v Speaker 1>gives us a great opportunity to talk about pig technology. Yeah,

0:01:47.040 --> 0:01:49.840
<v Speaker 1>this is this is a really fun one. I guess

0:01:49.840 --> 0:01:53.240
<v Speaker 1>you'd say. This is definitely a section of the New

0:01:53.280 --> 0:01:55.960
<v Speaker 1>Testament that I remember turning to when I would if

0:01:55.960 --> 0:01:58.560
<v Speaker 1>I was bored in church growing up, because it it

0:01:58.680 --> 0:02:02.080
<v Speaker 1>is such a weird little scene, you know, Jesus meeting

0:02:02.120 --> 0:02:05.600
<v Speaker 1>with um an individual that's possessed not by one demon,

0:02:05.680 --> 0:02:09.000
<v Speaker 1>but by like thousands of demons, a legion of demons

0:02:09.639 --> 0:02:13.280
<v Speaker 1>and uh, and then negotiating them out of the man,

0:02:13.520 --> 0:02:15.960
<v Speaker 1>but not only that, sending them then into a whole

0:02:16.000 --> 0:02:19.000
<v Speaker 1>bunch of pigs, which subsequently fall off the side of

0:02:19.000 --> 0:02:20.760
<v Speaker 1>a cliff into the ocean. Inge rown right. And there

0:02:20.760 --> 0:02:22.800
<v Speaker 1>are plenty of other stories in the New Testament about

0:02:22.880 --> 0:02:27.960
<v Speaker 1>Jesus doing various healings, doing exorcisms, so that that happens elsewhere.

0:02:28.000 --> 0:02:31.480
<v Speaker 1>But it's like the setting and the weird conclusion of

0:02:31.480 --> 0:02:34.440
<v Speaker 1>this story that make it so memorable going into the pigs.

0:02:35.480 --> 0:02:37.600
<v Speaker 1>So maybe we should look at the story in a

0:02:37.639 --> 0:02:40.120
<v Speaker 1>little bit of context and then come back to talk

0:02:40.160 --> 0:02:43.679
<v Speaker 1>about thoughts about it's you know, historical and theological role,

0:02:43.720 --> 0:02:46.640
<v Speaker 1>and then thoughts about pigs as animals and uh and

0:02:46.800 --> 0:02:50.360
<v Speaker 1>what a stampede of of devilish intelligence they might bring forth.

0:02:50.720 --> 0:02:53.080
<v Speaker 1>So I guess let's start with the story in the

0:02:53.120 --> 0:02:55.480
<v Speaker 1>context of the Gospel of Mark. And I think that's

0:02:55.480 --> 0:02:58.160
<v Speaker 1>a good place to start, because pretty much all scholars

0:02:58.240 --> 0:03:02.360
<v Speaker 1>agree that Mark is the earliest of the four canonical gospels,

0:03:02.360 --> 0:03:05.760
<v Speaker 1>since it's clear that the other gospels used Mark as

0:03:05.760 --> 0:03:08.880
<v Speaker 1>a source and like they made variations on it according

0:03:08.919 --> 0:03:11.880
<v Speaker 1>to their storytelling priorities, and probably also from the use

0:03:11.880 --> 0:03:15.720
<v Speaker 1>of other sources. Uh. Now, this story does also appear

0:03:15.720 --> 0:03:19.639
<v Speaker 1>in the Gospels of Matthew and Luke, but with some changes. Uh. So.

0:03:19.720 --> 0:03:22.720
<v Speaker 1>In the Gospel of Mark, the story happens in chapter five,

0:03:23.000 --> 0:03:25.760
<v Speaker 1>and it's right after a chapter where Jesus is out

0:03:25.800 --> 0:03:28.560
<v Speaker 1>preaching to a crowd. He tells the crowd a bunch

0:03:28.560 --> 0:03:31.639
<v Speaker 1>of familiar parables, like the parable of the lamp under

0:03:31.680 --> 0:03:34.720
<v Speaker 1>the bushel basket and the parable of the mustard seed.

0:03:34.800 --> 0:03:36.640
<v Speaker 1>You know, if you have faith is only the size

0:03:36.680 --> 0:03:40.680
<v Speaker 1>of a mustard seed, you can do great things, hits right. Uh.

0:03:40.720 --> 0:03:43.000
<v Speaker 1>And in the chapters before this in Mark, he's done

0:03:43.000 --> 0:03:46.240
<v Speaker 1>some various preaching, some healing. I think he heals the paralytic,

0:03:46.360 --> 0:03:49.360
<v Speaker 1>he heals a man with a withered hand. But so

0:03:49.400 --> 0:03:51.960
<v Speaker 1>at the end of this UH, at the fourth chapter,

0:03:52.080 --> 0:03:55.080
<v Speaker 1>after he's been doing this preaching, Jesus says, okay, let's

0:03:55.080 --> 0:03:57.400
<v Speaker 1>go across the sea, which is taken to refer to

0:03:57.440 --> 0:04:00.440
<v Speaker 1>the Sea of Galilee. It's a body of water UH

0:04:00.440 --> 0:04:03.440
<v Speaker 1>in the area. So Jesus and the disciples leave behind

0:04:03.440 --> 0:04:05.880
<v Speaker 1>the crowds. They get in the boat to cross the water,

0:04:05.960 --> 0:04:08.680
<v Speaker 1>and on the way across, a big storm comes up,

0:04:08.720 --> 0:04:11.320
<v Speaker 1>and the disciples are all shaken in their boots. But

0:04:11.360 --> 0:04:14.520
<v Speaker 1>then Jesus wakes up and he says, peace be still,

0:04:14.880 --> 0:04:18.240
<v Speaker 1>and the storm is replaced with dead calm. And then

0:04:18.360 --> 0:04:22.599
<v Speaker 1>Jesus goes on to immediately shame his disciples for being afraid, saying,

0:04:22.839 --> 0:04:25.760
<v Speaker 1>have you still no faith? And they're all of course

0:04:25.800 --> 0:04:28.400
<v Speaker 1>amazed by his powers, saying who is this then that

0:04:28.560 --> 0:04:31.599
<v Speaker 1>even the wind and the sea obey him. So I think,

0:04:31.600 --> 0:04:35.160
<v Speaker 1>in the context of the Gospel story, UH, this preacher

0:04:35.279 --> 0:04:38.480
<v Speaker 1>Jesus has been telling parables that shows great wisdom about

0:04:38.520 --> 0:04:41.400
<v Speaker 1>the coming Kingdom of God, and he's showing more and

0:04:41.440 --> 0:04:44.159
<v Speaker 1>more direct power himself all the time, not just as

0:04:44.200 --> 0:04:47.320
<v Speaker 1>a teacher, but as possibly some kind of sorcerer or

0:04:47.360 --> 0:04:50.080
<v Speaker 1>even divine being. And that's when we get to the

0:04:50.120 --> 0:04:52.520
<v Speaker 1>demoniac here. So they get to the other side of

0:04:52.560 --> 0:04:55.120
<v Speaker 1>the Sea of Galilee, and Mark says it's in the

0:04:55.160 --> 0:04:58.320
<v Speaker 1>country of the Garacenes, but other gospels say it's in

0:04:58.320 --> 0:05:00.880
<v Speaker 1>a different place, the country of the Maternes. And that's

0:05:00.880 --> 0:05:04.320
<v Speaker 1>why they're different names for this story, the gathering Swine,

0:05:04.360 --> 0:05:07.560
<v Speaker 1>the gathering demoniac, the Guarristine and swine the Garristine demoniac.

0:05:08.040 --> 0:05:11.160
<v Speaker 1>But wherever it is, we immediately meet this man out

0:05:11.200 --> 0:05:14.919
<v Speaker 1>of the tombs. Yeah. And it's it's worth noting that,

0:05:15.279 --> 0:05:18.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, the differences in the other two gospels. Um,

0:05:19.200 --> 0:05:21.760
<v Speaker 1>in Matthew, for instance, it's not one man out of

0:05:21.800 --> 0:05:24.560
<v Speaker 1>the tomb, but two men out of the tomb. Uh.

0:05:24.600 --> 0:05:26.920
<v Speaker 1>And then also in Luke, it's one man again, but

0:05:27.080 --> 0:05:30.160
<v Speaker 1>this time he's also naked, as if to you know,

0:05:30.200 --> 0:05:33.920
<v Speaker 1>really stress the feral nature of the individual. Well, yes,

0:05:34.000 --> 0:05:37.039
<v Speaker 1>and then Luke's telling of the story, Uh, it's I

0:05:37.080 --> 0:05:39.040
<v Speaker 1>think it's that's the one where it's stressed that he

0:05:39.080 --> 0:05:41.599
<v Speaker 1>was naked before he got the demons cast out, and

0:05:41.600 --> 0:05:44.160
<v Speaker 1>then he puts on clothes at once the demons are

0:05:44.160 --> 0:05:46.680
<v Speaker 1>out of him, right, and then sometimes in like retellings

0:05:47.120 --> 0:05:50.640
<v Speaker 1>I've noticed, especially in artistic depictions of this scene, sometimes

0:05:50.680 --> 0:05:53.039
<v Speaker 1>the artists seemed to just pick and choose from all three,

0:05:53.279 --> 0:05:55.040
<v Speaker 1>you know. So I saw one where it was two

0:05:55.160 --> 0:05:58.560
<v Speaker 1>naked individuals serving as the men of the tomb. Oh,

0:05:58.600 --> 0:06:01.080
<v Speaker 1>this is a very common thing that happens. Because you've got,

0:06:01.120 --> 0:06:03.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, different versions of the same story that appear

0:06:03.600 --> 0:06:06.920
<v Speaker 1>across the four Gospels. Sometimes people will just, like as

0:06:07.000 --> 0:06:09.640
<v Speaker 1>modern readers come, bind them all into one, so they'll

0:06:09.640 --> 0:06:11.839
<v Speaker 1>put all the elements there next to each other in

0:06:11.880 --> 0:06:14.880
<v Speaker 1>ways that don't always make sense, but it can be funny.

0:06:15.240 --> 0:06:18.320
<v Speaker 1>So what follows is, yeah, an exorcism scene, you know,

0:06:18.400 --> 0:06:21.200
<v Speaker 1>one that's maybe not as as dramatic as modern horror

0:06:21.279 --> 0:06:24.240
<v Speaker 1>viewers would would hope for. It's a little more more

0:06:24.279 --> 0:06:28.400
<v Speaker 1>of a negotiation in some respects. Yeah, but yeah, on

0:06:28.400 --> 0:06:31.320
<v Speaker 1>the face of it, we have a very disturbed individual

0:06:31.400 --> 0:06:34.279
<v Speaker 1>who seems to live among the tombs and abuses himself

0:06:34.320 --> 0:06:37.480
<v Speaker 1>with rocks, like scratching himself up with rocks. Yeah, we're

0:06:37.480 --> 0:06:39.640
<v Speaker 1>told he lives in the graveyard, but he spends day

0:06:39.640 --> 0:06:42.960
<v Speaker 1>and night prowling the graveyard in the mountains, bruising himself

0:06:42.960 --> 0:06:46.280
<v Speaker 1>with rocks and howling. Yeah, and then of course when

0:06:46.360 --> 0:06:49.120
<v Speaker 1>Jesus shows up, right, we get the the unclean spirits.

0:06:49.279 --> 0:06:53.480
<v Speaker 1>Immediately they start begging Jesus like they recognize his power,

0:06:53.640 --> 0:06:55.400
<v Speaker 1>which I think is a thing that's supposed to be

0:06:55.440 --> 0:06:58.120
<v Speaker 1>important in the story. Yeah, they realized they don't have

0:06:58.160 --> 0:07:02.200
<v Speaker 1>a lot of bargaining strength her into this. It's like

0:07:02.360 --> 0:07:04.880
<v Speaker 1>when the bad Cops shows up in the interrogation room.

0:07:04.920 --> 0:07:07.599
<v Speaker 1>They're like, oh no, yeah, now we're we've been getting

0:07:07.640 --> 0:07:09.920
<v Speaker 1>away with this, but now we're in trouble. And so

0:07:09.960 --> 0:07:13.280
<v Speaker 1>they immediately begged Jesus not to send them away. They

0:07:13.280 --> 0:07:15.600
<v Speaker 1>reveal their name, which I think we can come back

0:07:15.640 --> 0:07:18.280
<v Speaker 1>to that, but that might be a theologically significant thing.

0:07:18.400 --> 0:07:21.400
<v Speaker 1>They revealed their name is Legion, as in a large

0:07:21.520 --> 0:07:24.520
<v Speaker 1>Roman military unit consisting of more than a thousand soldiers.

0:07:24.600 --> 0:07:26.520
<v Speaker 1>It was different numbers at different times. Yeah. I was

0:07:26.520 --> 0:07:30.080
<v Speaker 1>looking at at various modern translations, and there's at least

0:07:30.080 --> 0:07:32.720
<v Speaker 1>one translation that just said our name is a lot

0:07:32.840 --> 0:07:35.240
<v Speaker 1>because there are a lot of us. I mean, I

0:07:35.280 --> 0:07:37.200
<v Speaker 1>do think that's sort of what it was supposed to mean,

0:07:37.320 --> 0:07:42.800
<v Speaker 1>but but it lacks that right you know, like, what

0:07:42.840 --> 0:07:45.240
<v Speaker 1>if it was the name is a whole message us,

0:07:45.800 --> 0:07:48.360
<v Speaker 1>Like what if the film was The Exorcist three colon

0:07:48.680 --> 0:07:54.200
<v Speaker 1>a lot instead of Legion, which which of course is

0:07:54.240 --> 0:07:57.560
<v Speaker 1>referring back to this very this very line. Uh. Though

0:07:57.800 --> 0:08:00.280
<v Speaker 1>it might also be significant that Legion is like a

0:08:00.400 --> 0:08:03.280
<v Speaker 1>Roman concept because of course at the time, like a

0:08:03.400 --> 0:08:07.280
<v Speaker 1>huge theme of the Gospels is that the people, the

0:08:07.360 --> 0:08:10.160
<v Speaker 1>Jewish people are being occupied by the Romans, and there

0:08:10.200 --> 0:08:12.600
<v Speaker 1>are a lot of sort of rebellious sentiments and anti

0:08:12.720 --> 0:08:15.760
<v Speaker 1>Roman ideas. Yeah, yeah, and when we'll definitely come back

0:08:15.760 --> 0:08:18.800
<v Speaker 1>to some of the Roman elements here. Yeah. But to

0:08:19.000 --> 0:08:21.880
<v Speaker 1>conclude the story, of course, this was in the opening

0:08:22.040 --> 0:08:25.080
<v Speaker 1>passage we read. But Jesus commands the demons out. They

0:08:25.080 --> 0:08:27.760
<v Speaker 1>asked him to send them into a flock of pigs nearby,

0:08:27.840 --> 0:08:30.240
<v Speaker 1>and Jesus is like, okay, take the pigs. So he

0:08:30.280 --> 0:08:32.600
<v Speaker 1>sends them into the pigs, and then the pigs immediately

0:08:32.640 --> 0:08:35.000
<v Speaker 1>go stampeding down into the water of the Sea of

0:08:35.040 --> 0:08:39.120
<v Speaker 1>Galilee to their doom. So I see overall that I

0:08:39.160 --> 0:08:41.400
<v Speaker 1>think this story in its place in the Gospel of

0:08:41.400 --> 0:08:44.560
<v Speaker 1>Mark is kind of an escalation moment. Like Jesus keeps

0:08:44.559 --> 0:08:47.600
<v Speaker 1>showing greater and greater power, not just wisdom and teaching,

0:08:47.920 --> 0:08:49.960
<v Speaker 1>not just power over the winds and the seas, but

0:08:50.040 --> 0:08:53.760
<v Speaker 1>now even over a legion of demons. And so all

0:08:53.800 --> 0:08:56.320
<v Speaker 1>the disciples are of course like, oh wow, how you

0:08:56.360 --> 0:08:59.560
<v Speaker 1>know he's he's so powerful. They keep emphasizing that this

0:08:59.640 --> 0:09:01.600
<v Speaker 1>is even more powerful than we thought he was before.

0:09:02.160 --> 0:09:03.760
<v Speaker 1>So I was looking around for a little more information

0:09:03.800 --> 0:09:06.680
<v Speaker 1>on this than I read A Spirit Possession and the

0:09:06.720 --> 0:09:11.679
<v Speaker 1>Garrison h Demoniac by J. Duncan M. Derrett from The

0:09:11.760 --> 0:09:15.720
<v Speaker 1>journal Man in nine and he made the following points

0:09:15.720 --> 0:09:17.200
<v Speaker 1>about it. The first of all, he points out there

0:09:17.200 --> 0:09:21.080
<v Speaker 1>are no really important textual textual variance of the tale,

0:09:21.240 --> 0:09:23.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, like one one man possessed by demons, too

0:09:23.880 --> 0:09:26.240
<v Speaker 1>naked or not naked like still, that the story is

0:09:26.800 --> 0:09:29.760
<v Speaker 1>essentially the same. Now, I wonder if that also refers

0:09:29.800 --> 0:09:32.520
<v Speaker 1>to the fact that there are not major like non

0:09:32.600 --> 0:09:36.280
<v Speaker 1>canonical early older texts that have different versions of the

0:09:36.280 --> 0:09:39.160
<v Speaker 1>story that change, because that is the case with some stories.

0:09:40.080 --> 0:09:43.480
<v Speaker 1>He also points out that the man here is clearly

0:09:43.920 --> 0:09:47.480
<v Speaker 1>shunned as unclean, and he's engaging and in kind of

0:09:47.480 --> 0:09:50.840
<v Speaker 1>an out of control cleansing ritual, you know, the scraping

0:09:50.880 --> 0:09:54.960
<v Speaker 1>of the body, um you know, the the abusing of

0:09:55.040 --> 0:09:57.960
<v Speaker 1>himself with rocks, you know, really on those same lines

0:09:58.000 --> 0:10:03.720
<v Speaker 1>as like flagellation and so forth. Um Deret also draws

0:10:03.720 --> 0:10:07.720
<v Speaker 1>comparisons to various rights of possession in other cultures where

0:10:07.960 --> 0:10:11.520
<v Speaker 1>sensation to physical pain is dulled, which I think is

0:10:11.640 --> 0:10:16.520
<v Speaker 1>an interesting point because there are various like especially religious

0:10:16.559 --> 0:10:19.720
<v Speaker 1>trials and rituals, in which one will do something that

0:10:19.960 --> 0:10:23.080
<v Speaker 1>is either you know, definitely painful or takes on the

0:10:23.120 --> 0:10:26.680
<v Speaker 1>appearance of painful and just be via the like the

0:10:26.760 --> 0:10:32.319
<v Speaker 1>frenzy of the of the ritual, one is able to

0:10:32.320 --> 0:10:36.480
<v Speaker 1>to experience less pain or to uh or at least

0:10:36.600 --> 0:10:38.079
<v Speaker 1>it's you know, you get into that area where it's

0:10:38.080 --> 0:10:40.240
<v Speaker 1>like there's the experience of the of the right, and

0:10:40.240 --> 0:10:43.400
<v Speaker 1>then there is the the story of the right you know.

0:10:43.559 --> 0:10:45.840
<v Speaker 1>Well yeah. This also makes me think, of course, about

0:10:45.880 --> 0:10:48.600
<v Speaker 1>the nature of what was going on when people believe

0:10:48.640 --> 0:10:52.000
<v Speaker 1>they encounter demon possession in the ancient world. I mean, so,

0:10:52.040 --> 0:10:53.800
<v Speaker 1>of course, there are multiple theories about this, and it

0:10:53.800 --> 0:10:56.120
<v Speaker 1>would probably vary from case to case. Of course, one

0:10:56.640 --> 0:10:59.760
<v Speaker 1>major and pretty obvious thing is the idea that people

0:10:59.760 --> 0:11:01.920
<v Speaker 1>in the ancient world often didn't understand that they were

0:11:01.920 --> 0:11:05.320
<v Speaker 1>looking at the symptoms of various mental illnesses, and you know,

0:11:05.600 --> 0:11:08.120
<v Speaker 1>would characterize that as a person being possessed by an

0:11:08.160 --> 0:11:11.600
<v Speaker 1>unclean spirit. But you could also imagine a person who

0:11:11.679 --> 0:11:15.960
<v Speaker 1>might not necessarily have a particular mental illness, but would

0:11:16.080 --> 0:11:19.960
<v Speaker 1>be prompted in some various way by the religious context

0:11:20.320 --> 0:11:22.520
<v Speaker 1>to believe that they were possessed in some way and

0:11:22.600 --> 0:11:24.880
<v Speaker 1>act out the role. Yeah. I think of some of

0:11:24.880 --> 0:11:29.360
<v Speaker 1>the medieval rights of penance that would come much later,

0:11:30.120 --> 0:11:34.120
<v Speaker 1>in which one would say, for instance, flatulate yourself with

0:11:34.120 --> 0:11:38.240
<v Speaker 1>with sticks or whips, uh you know where, ragged clothing

0:11:38.360 --> 0:11:41.320
<v Speaker 1>and crawl through the streets. Uh, you know that sort

0:11:41.360 --> 0:11:43.720
<v Speaker 1>of thing. Uh. So in in in all of this,

0:11:44.280 --> 0:11:46.960
<v Speaker 1>Dred is saying that this is you know, potentially essentially

0:11:46.960 --> 0:11:49.640
<v Speaker 1>at the theater of protests that's taking place. You know

0:11:50.000 --> 0:11:52.200
<v Speaker 1>that there is a you know, there's a performance quality

0:11:52.240 --> 0:11:55.640
<v Speaker 1>to it, um of course. And then he points out that,

0:11:55.840 --> 0:11:58.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, Jesus acquires the demon's name, which is often

0:11:58.440 --> 0:12:02.400
<v Speaker 1>an important aspect of some sort of an exorcism ritual.

0:12:02.840 --> 0:12:06.000
<v Speaker 1>And I think that even shows up in like the

0:12:05.160 --> 0:12:09.640
<v Speaker 1>the Conjuring movies, right. Really, Yeah, I didn't know if

0:12:09.679 --> 0:12:13.480
<v Speaker 1>there was a like an actual ancient exorcism precedent for that,

0:12:13.559 --> 0:12:15.640
<v Speaker 1>but it's in the second Conjuring movie. There's this whole

0:12:15.679 --> 0:12:17.840
<v Speaker 1>thing where it's like I figured out the demon's name,

0:12:17.920 --> 0:12:20.319
<v Speaker 1>now I can defeat it. Oh yeah, it's definitely definitely

0:12:20.320 --> 0:12:22.800
<v Speaker 1>part of Dungeons and Dragons, you know, really the demon's name,

0:12:22.880 --> 0:12:26.160
<v Speaker 1>you have some power over it. Usually from the Gospel

0:12:26.160 --> 0:12:30.160
<v Speaker 1>of Guy GaX. Yeah. Um. And then he also points

0:12:30.160 --> 0:12:32.320
<v Speaker 1>out what we just discussed already. Legion is, of course

0:12:32.320 --> 0:12:34.920
<v Speaker 1>a military term. The man is possessed by a host

0:12:34.960 --> 0:12:37.319
<v Speaker 1>of demons, and Jesus is he's either speaking to all

0:12:37.360 --> 0:12:40.760
<v Speaker 1>of them or perhaps to the leader commanding them. And

0:12:41.040 --> 0:12:43.439
<v Speaker 1>Jesus has presented as being, you know, much more than

0:12:43.440 --> 0:12:45.760
<v Speaker 1>a match for an entire legion of demons. Like you said,

0:12:45.760 --> 0:12:47.600
<v Speaker 1>this is a lot of this is about presenting just

0:12:47.679 --> 0:12:51.080
<v Speaker 1>how how powerful Jesus is. Yes, And I think that's

0:12:51.240 --> 0:12:53.679
<v Speaker 1>an important point of comparison. When even you look at

0:12:53.720 --> 0:12:56.280
<v Speaker 1>something like in The Exorcist, you know, the priests show

0:12:56.400 --> 0:12:59.120
<v Speaker 1>up and the demon taunts them and stuff. It's like, okay,

0:12:59.120 --> 0:13:01.679
<v Speaker 1>I'm ready to do bad attle. When Jesus shows up,

0:13:01.679 --> 0:13:04.760
<v Speaker 1>the demon is immediately crying uncle. He's like Oh no,

0:13:05.040 --> 0:13:08.200
<v Speaker 1>don't send me out too far. Maybe just let me

0:13:08.240 --> 0:13:12.800
<v Speaker 1>go to the pigs, like he immediately knows he's beaten now. Pigs,

0:13:12.880 --> 0:13:16.920
<v Speaker 1>Derek reminds us, were slaughtered in offering to the underworld

0:13:16.960 --> 0:13:20.960
<v Speaker 1>at Roman burials, thus their connection to the tombs and

0:13:21.080 --> 0:13:25.160
<v Speaker 1>to this particular individual's fascination with morbidity and with death.

0:13:25.880 --> 0:13:29.440
<v Speaker 1>Pigs are associated with sacrifices to demons as well as

0:13:29.480 --> 0:13:32.959
<v Speaker 1>with beast reality, and Derett stresses that there is a

0:13:33.120 --> 0:13:37.000
<v Speaker 1>sexual connotation to spirit possession. Uh, you know, this idea

0:13:37.040 --> 0:13:40.080
<v Speaker 1>of of entering into the pigs, or also just the

0:13:40.120 --> 0:13:43.480
<v Speaker 1>idea of a spirit having entered into you and taken

0:13:43.520 --> 0:13:46.080
<v Speaker 1>hold of your senses. Well, that also makes me think

0:13:46.120 --> 0:13:50.760
<v Speaker 1>about another possible explanation for a belief in spirit possession

0:13:50.760 --> 0:13:53.120
<v Speaker 1>in the ancient world, which is just maybe a person

0:13:53.200 --> 0:13:56.839
<v Speaker 1>wasn't even necessarily experiencing symptoms of mental illness or even

0:13:56.920 --> 0:13:59.760
<v Speaker 1>acting out a possession. Maybe they were just behaving in

0:13:59.760 --> 0:14:03.320
<v Speaker 1>an unconventional way and people around them said, well, you know,

0:14:03.400 --> 0:14:05.679
<v Speaker 1>nobody in the right mind would act like that. So

0:14:05.880 --> 0:14:08.679
<v Speaker 1>if they violated sexual taboos or something like that, you

0:14:08.720 --> 0:14:11.120
<v Speaker 1>could say they must have had a demon in order

0:14:11.160 --> 0:14:13.520
<v Speaker 1>to do that. Now, one thing that he does point

0:14:13.520 --> 0:14:17.640
<v Speaker 1>out is that pigs are actually great swimmers, really yeah,

0:14:17.679 --> 0:14:20.640
<v Speaker 1>and also that they don't stampede. So there's a big

0:14:20.680 --> 0:14:23.960
<v Speaker 1>problem with this idea of potentially it defends how I

0:14:24.000 --> 0:14:26.520
<v Speaker 1>guess you read into the demon possession of the pigs.

0:14:26.560 --> 0:14:28.920
<v Speaker 1>But pigs on their own are not going to stampede.

0:14:28.960 --> 0:14:31.960
<v Speaker 1>They're probably not going to drown in the river. Now,

0:14:32.000 --> 0:14:34.160
<v Speaker 1>I guess you could say that, well, they're not. They're

0:14:34.160 --> 0:14:37.040
<v Speaker 1>no longer pig brains controlling those pigs. Those are scared

0:14:37.040 --> 0:14:40.680
<v Speaker 1>demon brains, and maybe they don't know how to swim. Well,

0:14:40.880 --> 0:14:43.080
<v Speaker 1>this is funny. I was also looking up examples. I

0:14:43.120 --> 0:14:46.160
<v Speaker 1>was trying to find things about pigs stampeding. I didn't

0:14:46.160 --> 0:14:50.720
<v Speaker 1>really find anything like good documented like zoological literature about

0:14:50.760 --> 0:14:54.280
<v Speaker 1>pig stampeding, though I did find a news story about

0:14:54.360 --> 0:14:58.920
<v Speaker 1>supposedly somewhere in Syria stampede of pigs killing some IIS

0:14:59.000 --> 0:15:02.520
<v Speaker 1>fighters and in recent years. But I think that's probably

0:15:02.560 --> 0:15:05.280
<v Speaker 1>just like a news like a journalist appellation. It might

0:15:05.280 --> 0:15:07.480
<v Speaker 1>have not have been a stampede, but just like a

0:15:07.560 --> 0:15:10.200
<v Speaker 1>herd of pigs. Wasn't there a scene in a cornte

0:15:10.240 --> 0:15:13.880
<v Speaker 1>McCarthy novel where I heard of pigs trample off into

0:15:13.880 --> 0:15:16.040
<v Speaker 1>the river, though probably a reference to this very tale.

0:15:16.120 --> 0:15:17.400
<v Speaker 1>I feel like it was. It was one of the

0:15:17.400 --> 0:15:22.040
<v Speaker 1>Appalachian books, like maybe Child of God or Outer Dark.

0:15:22.520 --> 0:15:25.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I've I've read some of those books,

0:15:26.040 --> 0:15:29.240
<v Speaker 1>but I don't remember that scene. But I could be wrong. Yeah,

0:15:29.320 --> 0:15:31.560
<v Speaker 1>it might not have been picked, been something else. But

0:15:31.600 --> 0:15:34.080
<v Speaker 1>there are a lot of drowned animals at one point,

0:15:34.120 --> 0:15:38.360
<v Speaker 1>certainly now on the uncleanliness of pigs. Obviously, much has

0:15:38.360 --> 0:15:41.240
<v Speaker 1>been written about this because there you know, there there

0:15:41.240 --> 0:15:45.400
<v Speaker 1>are uh supposed practical reasons that pork is prohibited in

0:15:45.480 --> 0:15:48.720
<v Speaker 1>Judaism and Islam. One is that pigs are not very

0:15:48.760 --> 0:15:52.760
<v Speaker 1>sustainable and drier environments. That's the argument. Another is that pork,

0:15:52.880 --> 0:15:55.600
<v Speaker 1>of course can contain trickin nosis, but of course that's

0:15:55.640 --> 0:15:59.400
<v Speaker 1>taken care of if it's cooked properly. Um so, so

0:15:59.440 --> 0:16:01.880
<v Speaker 1>it's often in it out that like that, even when

0:16:02.000 --> 0:16:07.680
<v Speaker 1>Judaism and Islam, even when these religions travel out of

0:16:08.320 --> 0:16:11.040
<v Speaker 1>areas where you could make the argument that a pig

0:16:11.080 --> 0:16:14.920
<v Speaker 1>is not suitable for this environment, like, the restriction still remains. Yeah,

0:16:14.960 --> 0:16:18.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure. I'm convinced by any of the alleged

0:16:18.080 --> 0:16:21.320
<v Speaker 1>practical reasons behind the prohibition on pork and other foods

0:16:21.320 --> 0:16:25.160
<v Speaker 1>in Judaism and Islam, because I mean, I haven't seen

0:16:25.200 --> 0:16:28.480
<v Speaker 1>any really convincing evidence there. It seems to be more likely.

0:16:29.000 --> 0:16:31.840
<v Speaker 1>This is another one of the many unique practices and

0:16:31.920 --> 0:16:34.640
<v Speaker 1>characteristics you'd find in any religion or culture that don't

0:16:34.680 --> 0:16:38.760
<v Speaker 1>necessarily result from some kind of clear material environmental mandate.

0:16:38.800 --> 0:16:40.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean, there are some like we were just recently

0:16:40.640 --> 0:16:44.760
<v Speaker 1>talking about, you know, sky burial practices in Tibet being

0:16:44.840 --> 0:16:48.160
<v Speaker 1>a religious cultural practice, but perhaps resulting from the fact

0:16:48.440 --> 0:16:51.240
<v Speaker 1>that also within that landscape, it's hard to find places

0:16:51.240 --> 0:16:53.680
<v Speaker 1>to dig graves, it's hard to find wood to burn

0:16:53.760 --> 0:16:56.040
<v Speaker 1>bodies with, so it just sort of makes sense from

0:16:56.040 --> 0:17:00.560
<v Speaker 1>a material environmental standpoint. I think sometimes explanations like that

0:17:00.600 --> 0:17:02.600
<v Speaker 1>makes sense. But I'm I'm not convinced by any of

0:17:02.680 --> 0:17:05.479
<v Speaker 1>the pork ones, right. Another one that sometimes brought up

0:17:05.480 --> 0:17:08.840
<v Speaker 1>well there in the texts themselves. Sometimes a point is

0:17:08.840 --> 0:17:12.880
<v Speaker 1>made about the cloven hoof, which seems kind of nonsensical. Why, yeah,

0:17:12.920 --> 0:17:17.040
<v Speaker 1>what's the problem. Yeah, there's also the idea that, well,

0:17:17.080 --> 0:17:20.520
<v Speaker 1>pigs are omnivores and they may consume scavenged flesh, and

0:17:20.560 --> 0:17:23.040
<v Speaker 1>that could be seen as unclean. But yes, we've discussed

0:17:23.040 --> 0:17:25.640
<v Speaker 1>in the show before even strict herbivores will eat meat

0:17:25.680 --> 0:17:30.240
<v Speaker 1>on occasion. Um. I Unfortunately, like I did some searching

0:17:30.359 --> 0:17:33.000
<v Speaker 1>on this, uh and and saw some videos of like

0:17:33.000 --> 0:17:36.320
<v Speaker 1>like how many ducklings can can a particular cow eat that?

0:17:37.280 --> 0:17:39.560
<v Speaker 1>You know? I mean, it just it happens, it's it's

0:17:39.680 --> 0:17:46.440
<v Speaker 1>it's so it's never considered cows before. We've thought about

0:17:46.480 --> 0:17:49.960
<v Speaker 1>like deer eating meat. Of course, squirrels and meat, we think, yeah,

0:17:49.960 --> 0:17:54.000
<v Speaker 1>wilder creatures, right, But this now is just haunting my brain.

0:17:54.200 --> 0:17:56.280
<v Speaker 1>Why is it so much scarier to be eaten by

0:17:56.280 --> 0:17:58.840
<v Speaker 1>a cow than any other animal? I can think because

0:17:58.840 --> 0:18:01.040
<v Speaker 1>you trusted it so much. I thought that you had it,

0:18:01.480 --> 0:18:04.600
<v Speaker 1>had invested through a domestication. Seems so docile, and then

0:18:04.600 --> 0:18:07.119
<v Speaker 1>it jumps seven feet straight in the air and eats you.

0:18:07.160 --> 0:18:09.399
<v Speaker 1>Have you ever seen how high cows can jump? It

0:18:09.440 --> 0:18:12.119
<v Speaker 1>looks wrong. I don't know that I have. Certainly I'm

0:18:12.160 --> 0:18:15.080
<v Speaker 1>always impressed by how fast a horse can move, and

0:18:15.080 --> 0:18:16.879
<v Speaker 1>how fast it can like PLoP unto the ground and

0:18:16.920 --> 0:18:19.879
<v Speaker 1>pop back up again. So let's get back though to

0:18:19.920 --> 0:18:23.920
<v Speaker 1>the religious reasons that ultimately the social reasons to prohibit

0:18:24.000 --> 0:18:28.400
<v Speaker 1>something like a pork is explained by a Nigel Barber, PhD.

0:18:28.440 --> 0:18:32.080
<v Speaker 1>In psychology today. The signaling theory of religion puts forth

0:18:32.080 --> 0:18:34.639
<v Speaker 1>that abstaining from something like pork is a way of

0:18:34.680 --> 0:18:37.879
<v Speaker 1>signaling your devotion and provides something that a social group

0:18:37.920 --> 0:18:40.960
<v Speaker 1>can bond over, and there's a you're all going to

0:18:41.000 --> 0:18:44.960
<v Speaker 1>be paying a ritual cost for this. Basically, food taboos

0:18:45.080 --> 0:18:48.879
<v Speaker 1>keep co religionists together and and it's something where like

0:18:48.960 --> 0:18:52.000
<v Speaker 1>everyone has to give up something, you have to pay

0:18:52.880 --> 0:18:56.920
<v Speaker 1>a fee to to join this club. Yeah, that makes

0:18:56.960 --> 0:18:58.600
<v Speaker 1>a lot of sense to me. Again, I don't know

0:18:58.720 --> 0:19:02.119
<v Speaker 1>that that's the primary real reason, but that certainly seems

0:19:02.200 --> 0:19:04.359
<v Speaker 1>very plausible. I mean, I think they are all kinds

0:19:04.400 --> 0:19:08.720
<v Speaker 1>of things that religions do where the main goal of

0:19:08.760 --> 0:19:11.960
<v Speaker 1>doing them is showing that you are a devoted member

0:19:12.000 --> 0:19:14.760
<v Speaker 1>of the religion and good standing. Right. Yeah, I mean,

0:19:14.800 --> 0:19:17.359
<v Speaker 1>like for a modern example, one turns to like the

0:19:17.720 --> 0:19:20.960
<v Speaker 1>straight edge movement. Right, We're on one hand, you can say, okay,

0:19:21.000 --> 0:19:23.440
<v Speaker 1>there is a sort of signaling going on here. People

0:19:23.440 --> 0:19:26.920
<v Speaker 1>who are abstaining from these various substances are doing so

0:19:27.000 --> 0:19:29.040
<v Speaker 1>and by doing so they can they can claim to

0:19:29.040 --> 0:19:32.679
<v Speaker 1>be a part of a particular group. However, it's not

0:19:32.720 --> 0:19:36.160
<v Speaker 1>the only thing, like they're also you know, any individual

0:19:36.280 --> 0:19:38.960
<v Speaker 1>that's that's following that lifestyle will also point to other

0:19:39.040 --> 0:19:41.720
<v Speaker 1>reasons why they are abstaining, not merely to be a

0:19:41.760 --> 0:19:44.040
<v Speaker 1>part of a group, but for you know, various other

0:19:44.119 --> 0:19:48.440
<v Speaker 1>lifestyle purposes. Oh sure, yeah, yeah, I mean, but whether

0:19:48.520 --> 0:19:51.479
<v Speaker 1>or not those other reasons are also truly motivating them,

0:19:51.520 --> 0:19:55.800
<v Speaker 1>I think it's hard to deny that shared abstinence creates solidarity. Right,

0:19:56.240 --> 0:19:58.359
<v Speaker 1>But to come back to the Romans, the Romans definitely

0:19:58.440 --> 0:20:01.960
<v Speaker 1>a pork. And so when the Omens roll in and began,

0:20:02.280 --> 0:20:05.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, controlling your territory, derating the pork, you are not.

0:20:06.160 --> 0:20:08.160
<v Speaker 1>There's a firm line to be drawn in the sand

0:20:08.160 --> 0:20:10.760
<v Speaker 1>there between us and them, right right, So there could

0:20:10.760 --> 0:20:13.439
<v Speaker 1>be like people all around with flocks of pigs that

0:20:13.480 --> 0:20:15.400
<v Speaker 1>they're preparing to eat, and you can look at those

0:20:15.440 --> 0:20:18.240
<v Speaker 1>things and be like, well, that's no part of my life. Yeah.

0:20:18.320 --> 0:20:22.440
<v Speaker 1>And of course, ultimately, you know, rules against eating certain

0:20:22.440 --> 0:20:25.000
<v Speaker 1>animals are going to be kind of an arbitrary agreement.

0:20:25.440 --> 0:20:27.160
<v Speaker 1>And I think a huge example of this, as well

0:20:27.160 --> 0:20:30.480
<v Speaker 1>discussed is the predominant American notion that it's well and

0:20:30.560 --> 0:20:33.080
<v Speaker 1>good to eat a pig, that eating a pig is

0:20:33.080 --> 0:20:35.680
<v Speaker 1>something that should be celebrated, we should have parades about it.

0:20:35.960 --> 0:20:38.399
<v Speaker 1>But eating a dog, well, that's just that's just not

0:20:38.480 --> 0:20:41.880
<v Speaker 1>acceptable now. And then nature of exercismicism itself, Well, we've

0:20:41.920 --> 0:20:44.120
<v Speaker 1>covered exorcism on the show before, and I think it's

0:20:44.119 --> 0:20:46.720
<v Speaker 1>always important to to think about rights of exorcism across

0:20:46.800 --> 0:20:50.679
<v Speaker 1>various cultures. Is is being rights potentially too, of expulsion

0:20:50.720 --> 0:20:54.560
<v Speaker 1>of negative feelings, uh, negative attributes, and in some cases

0:20:55.160 --> 0:20:59.520
<v Speaker 1>an attempt crude attempt in some cases to treat mental illness,

0:21:00.200 --> 0:21:01.920
<v Speaker 1>you know. But I think think we have to think about,

0:21:02.000 --> 0:21:04.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, a tendency to think about the exorcisms as

0:21:04.520 --> 0:21:07.439
<v Speaker 1>a pure, superstitious right, and you know, not to think

0:21:07.440 --> 0:21:11.480
<v Speaker 1>about its connotations to more secular rights, such as expelling

0:21:11.520 --> 0:21:15.440
<v Speaker 1>negative thoughts via breath in various meditation and yoga practices,

0:21:15.520 --> 0:21:17.720
<v Speaker 1>you know. I mean, we don't think of that as exorcism,

0:21:17.720 --> 0:21:20.119
<v Speaker 1>We don't think of that as magic, but it is

0:21:20.160 --> 0:21:23.399
<v Speaker 1>an exercise that can allow us to well to to

0:21:23.520 --> 0:21:26.440
<v Speaker 1>to quote, doone to you know, to allow your your

0:21:26.480 --> 0:21:28.919
<v Speaker 1>fear to pass over and through you Oh yeah. I

0:21:28.920 --> 0:21:32.280
<v Speaker 1>mean I've see no problem at all from a secular standpoint,

0:21:32.640 --> 0:21:37.919
<v Speaker 1>excepting that exorcism could sometimes be a successful psychological intervention,

0:21:38.320 --> 0:21:41.800
<v Speaker 1>not because there are actually like like spirit demons, but

0:21:41.920 --> 0:21:44.119
<v Speaker 1>because like going like you're saying, like going through a

0:21:44.160 --> 0:21:47.880
<v Speaker 1>cathartic event where you go through some kind of ritual purging. Uh.

0:21:48.040 --> 0:21:50.879
<v Speaker 1>I'm not saying that it's necessarily a reliable practice, but

0:21:50.960 --> 0:21:54.320
<v Speaker 1>it's not surprising that it might work sometimes in some cases.

0:21:54.480 --> 0:21:57.160
<v Speaker 1>And certainly not to say that it is a better

0:21:57.200 --> 0:22:00.719
<v Speaker 1>method for like, for actual mental illness. But but at

0:22:00.720 --> 0:22:02.960
<v Speaker 1>any rate, I just want to like frame, you know,

0:22:03.000 --> 0:22:05.960
<v Speaker 1>provide a frame of reference for it. Um. Also, I

0:22:05.960 --> 0:22:07.800
<v Speaker 1>want to come back to the idea of pig based

0:22:07.920 --> 0:22:12.879
<v Speaker 1>u beings, pig based monsters, and pig based creatures. Um.

0:22:13.160 --> 0:22:14.639
<v Speaker 1>You do see these should pop up in a lot

0:22:14.680 --> 0:22:18.760
<v Speaker 1>of different mythologies around the world wherever they are pigs.

0:22:19.119 --> 0:22:21.919
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's just given right, wherever there are pigs,

0:22:21.920 --> 0:22:24.200
<v Speaker 1>there is going to be some idea of the pig

0:22:24.480 --> 0:22:27.880
<v Speaker 1>half man, half pig being man. Pig monsters are are

0:22:28.040 --> 0:22:31.560
<v Speaker 1>underrated for horror value, yeah, absolutely, I feel like sometimes

0:22:31.560 --> 0:22:35.240
<v Speaker 1>they're rolled out as more comedic relief uh. And in

0:22:35.280 --> 0:22:38.000
<v Speaker 1>those cases, I don't I don't think enough you know,

0:22:38.160 --> 0:22:42.240
<v Speaker 1>enough emphasis is placed on just how how horrifying, how

0:22:42.280 --> 0:22:46.480
<v Speaker 1>scary like a wild boar can be. I have no

0:22:46.560 --> 0:22:50.040
<v Speaker 1>respect to whatsoever for the solo movies. That's just not

0:22:50.119 --> 0:22:52.439
<v Speaker 1>my kind of horror film. But the one thing I

0:22:52.480 --> 0:22:56.000
<v Speaker 1>remember thinking was actually successful about them is just the

0:22:56.000 --> 0:22:58.920
<v Speaker 1>fact that, like the creep in them, Where's sometimes wears

0:22:58.960 --> 0:23:01.040
<v Speaker 1>a pig mask. Oh yeah, that was one of his

0:23:01.160 --> 0:23:05.440
<v Speaker 1>many disguises, and one of a very dramatic individual. He

0:23:05.480 --> 0:23:08.440
<v Speaker 1>had a mask, yet a puppet. He had a whole

0:23:08.440 --> 0:23:12.240
<v Speaker 1>production truck. The puppets just kind of goofy. The pig

0:23:12.280 --> 0:23:15.400
<v Speaker 1>mask is where it's at. Uh. Now, I want to

0:23:15.440 --> 0:23:19.560
<v Speaker 1>make a quick side note about Chinese tradition, you know,

0:23:19.560 --> 0:23:21.960
<v Speaker 1>and all this talk of demons and pigs, I can't

0:23:21.960 --> 0:23:24.240
<v Speaker 1>help but think of Pigsy. Are you familiar with Pigsy?

0:23:24.400 --> 0:23:27.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't think I know Pigsy, Pigsy or what is it?

0:23:27.640 --> 0:23:32.240
<v Speaker 1>A zoo um bagier from Journey into the West. So

0:23:32.920 --> 0:23:34.800
<v Speaker 1>if you just if you look up Journey into the

0:23:34.800 --> 0:23:37.840
<v Speaker 1>West and Pigsy, uh, for instance, on YouTube, you'll find

0:23:38.000 --> 0:23:40.840
<v Speaker 1>numerous clips I'm sure from the various film and TV

0:23:40.960 --> 0:23:43.080
<v Speaker 1>adaptations of Journey into the West. I mean, they've also

0:23:43.119 --> 0:23:46.520
<v Speaker 1>been video game adaptations of Journey into the West, but

0:23:47.160 --> 0:23:50.159
<v Speaker 1>the accounts vary. But basically, he was punished by the

0:23:50.280 --> 0:23:53.840
<v Speaker 1>Jade Emperor for lusting after chang Uh, the Goddess of

0:23:53.880 --> 0:23:56.360
<v Speaker 1>the Moon, and his punishment, he's cast down to Earth

0:23:56.400 --> 0:23:58.080
<v Speaker 1>and winds up in the form of a half pig,

0:23:58.200 --> 0:24:01.399
<v Speaker 1>half human monster. But just his faults, he becomes a

0:24:01.440 --> 0:24:04.400
<v Speaker 1>great adventure and is a key character and Journey into

0:24:04.400 --> 0:24:08.320
<v Speaker 1>the West and ultimately slays many demons. Oh, a pig slayer.

0:24:08.480 --> 0:24:10.359
<v Speaker 1>Did we talk about him in our in our monster

0:24:10.440 --> 0:24:13.400
<v Speaker 1>Slayer episode last year? I don't think we did. Um. Yeah,

0:24:13.680 --> 0:24:15.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't think Journey into the West has has actually

0:24:15.520 --> 0:24:17.679
<v Speaker 1>come up on the show before. But there's you know,

0:24:17.720 --> 0:24:19.919
<v Speaker 1>there's a there's a lot of wonderful material there if

0:24:19.920 --> 0:24:22.000
<v Speaker 1>we ever choose to come back to it. Oh, I

0:24:22.000 --> 0:24:23.960
<v Speaker 1>guess I gotta read it now. Yeah, we're watching. Like

0:24:24.000 --> 0:24:28.159
<v Speaker 1>I said, there's some fabulous film adaptations of this. You

0:24:28.240 --> 0:24:31.000
<v Speaker 1>got the Monkey King, you got Pigsy or the whole group.

0:24:31.320 --> 0:24:32.680
<v Speaker 1>All right, I think we have to take a break,

0:24:32.680 --> 0:24:35.760
<v Speaker 1>but we will be right back with more about about

0:24:35.760 --> 0:24:39.720
<v Speaker 1>the garristine demoniac, the gathering swine, pig science, and and

0:24:39.880 --> 0:24:45.040
<v Speaker 1>much more than Alright, we're back. So I've I've already

0:24:45.040 --> 0:24:47.000
<v Speaker 1>mentioned how this is. This is one of those little

0:24:47.000 --> 0:24:49.399
<v Speaker 1>Bible stories that if you're if you're bored in a

0:24:49.480 --> 0:24:52.879
<v Speaker 1>Christian church, you sometimes turned to. Also, it has had

0:24:53.080 --> 0:24:56.240
<v Speaker 1>a big influence on on horror and sort of demonic

0:24:56.320 --> 0:25:02.280
<v Speaker 1>and occults themed material, most notably The Exorcist three Legion,

0:25:02.520 --> 0:25:05.600
<v Speaker 1>a surprisingly good movie, given that The Exorcist one, of

0:25:05.640 --> 0:25:09.720
<v Speaker 1>course horror classic Exorcist to one of the most hilarious

0:25:09.800 --> 0:25:12.680
<v Speaker 1>bad horror movies of all time. I remember it's got

0:25:12.680 --> 0:25:15.400
<v Speaker 1>a line in it it's something like your machine has

0:25:15.440 --> 0:25:20.400
<v Speaker 1>scientifically proven there's an ancient demon locked inside her. Yeah.

0:25:20.440 --> 0:25:22.760
<v Speaker 1>I think if I had to rewatch an Exorcist film

0:25:22.840 --> 0:25:25.359
<v Speaker 1>this year, it would be three, Like like one is

0:25:25.400 --> 0:25:28.639
<v Speaker 1>a classic. But also I've always been one that is

0:25:29.119 --> 0:25:31.880
<v Speaker 1>believed that the best parts of the Exorcist are not

0:25:32.200 --> 0:25:36.480
<v Speaker 1>the you know, the screaming crazy uh you know Reagan,

0:25:36.560 --> 0:25:40.480
<v Speaker 1>the you know, raging out with demonic possession. It's smaller moments.

0:25:40.480 --> 0:25:44.479
<v Speaker 1>It's like the little what Pozoozu, the creature that's been

0:25:44.520 --> 0:25:47.480
<v Speaker 1>made by the child or or drawn on a sheet

0:25:47.480 --> 0:25:50.280
<v Speaker 1>in the background. That sure, yeah, yeah, I totally agree.

0:25:50.320 --> 0:25:51.879
<v Speaker 1>I actually think some of the best stuff in The

0:25:51.880 --> 0:25:53.720
<v Speaker 1>Exorcist is the parts where it's kind of like a

0:25:53.760 --> 0:25:56.560
<v Speaker 1>seventies character study movie. I mean, there are parts that

0:25:56.560 --> 0:25:59.280
<v Speaker 1>almost feel kind of like a Scorsese movie or something,

0:26:00.040 --> 0:26:02.479
<v Speaker 1>with like father Cares visiting his mother and that kind

0:26:02.480 --> 0:26:06.080
<v Speaker 1>of stuff, and his horrible nightmares. And I think it's

0:26:06.080 --> 0:26:08.679
<v Speaker 1>a very effective horror film. But Exorcist three is also

0:26:08.800 --> 0:26:11.040
<v Speaker 1>really really good. It's been years since I've seen it,

0:26:11.080 --> 0:26:13.880
<v Speaker 1>but uh, at least I won't say it's as good

0:26:13.920 --> 0:26:16.240
<v Speaker 1>as the first one, but it's surprisingly good for being

0:26:16.280 --> 0:26:19.000
<v Speaker 1>a third film. I can't think of a third film

0:26:19.040 --> 0:26:23.359
<v Speaker 1>that competes apart from Halloween three. Oh um, Underworld three

0:26:24.640 --> 0:26:27.720
<v Speaker 1>is the best of the Underworld. So there's that. But

0:26:27.760 --> 0:26:30.040
<v Speaker 1>the the ie An Legion things shows up in all

0:26:30.160 --> 0:26:32.840
<v Speaker 1>kinds of just like you know, demon horror, right, it's

0:26:32.880 --> 0:26:35.160
<v Speaker 1>how can you resist? It seems like such an easy

0:26:35.160 --> 0:26:37.879
<v Speaker 1>thing to pick up and run with. I remember it

0:26:37.960 --> 0:26:41.240
<v Speaker 1>also shows up in something that I inexplicably read when

0:26:41.280 --> 0:26:44.439
<v Speaker 1>I was a kid. I remember buying a used copy

0:26:44.560 --> 0:26:49.200
<v Speaker 1>of the screenplay or the teleplay to Stephen King's Storm

0:26:49.280 --> 0:26:52.040
<v Speaker 1>of the Century, which is I think not ever a

0:26:52.080 --> 0:26:54.199
<v Speaker 1>piece of fiction. I think he wrote it directly for

0:26:54.320 --> 0:26:56.639
<v Speaker 1>like made for TV. So I was just reading the

0:26:56.680 --> 0:26:59.879
<v Speaker 1>original work, which is his teleplay, not kings best work,

0:27:00.080 --> 0:27:03.399
<v Speaker 1>but basically, uh, the demon Legion shows up in a

0:27:03.440 --> 0:27:06.159
<v Speaker 1>small island town in New England, of course, and he

0:27:06.240 --> 0:27:09.840
<v Speaker 1>demands to steal the town's children. And he he's originally

0:27:09.920 --> 0:27:13.400
<v Speaker 1>disguised as a man named Lenoge and of course it's

0:27:13.440 --> 0:27:17.240
<v Speaker 1>an anagram for my name is for Legion for but

0:27:17.280 --> 0:27:20.400
<v Speaker 1>also he's played by the demon is played by Comb Fiori,

0:27:20.880 --> 0:27:24.159
<v Speaker 1>a prolific character actor and the bad guy from one

0:27:24.160 --> 0:27:27.240
<v Speaker 1>of your favorites, Robert Chronicles of Rittick. Oh yeah, he's

0:27:27.480 --> 0:27:29.720
<v Speaker 1>what the Lord Marshall right right, yeah? Is he like

0:27:29.800 --> 0:27:32.040
<v Speaker 1>he's like the main big bad in it and yeah, yeah,

0:27:32.040 --> 0:27:34.960
<v Speaker 1>he's the head necromonger. Yeah yeah, and he's he is

0:27:34.960 --> 0:27:37.000
<v Speaker 1>a wonderful character Actor's been in tons of things, so

0:27:37.160 --> 0:27:40.199
<v Speaker 1>great comedic actor as well. Now, in any given like

0:27:40.800 --> 0:27:43.359
<v Speaker 1>piece of a religious text, there, you know, there's always

0:27:43.440 --> 0:27:46.119
<v Speaker 1>various things going on with it, right, there's a question

0:27:46.160 --> 0:27:48.680
<v Speaker 1>of what does it say, what is the story, What

0:27:48.720 --> 0:27:52.119
<v Speaker 1>did the the people who wrote it or told it

0:27:52.280 --> 0:27:54.719
<v Speaker 1>or transcribed it mean for it to say? And then

0:27:54.760 --> 0:27:56.919
<v Speaker 1>what is the tradition of using it? How has it

0:27:56.960 --> 0:28:01.600
<v Speaker 1>been used and even misused over the years to drive

0:28:01.640 --> 0:28:04.960
<v Speaker 1>home particular points? Right? Often, what did the author intend

0:28:05.040 --> 0:28:07.760
<v Speaker 1>for it to mean versus how has it been interpreted

0:28:07.800 --> 0:28:10.720
<v Speaker 1>by the faithful over the years is a very different thing. Yeah,

0:28:10.760 --> 0:28:14.320
<v Speaker 1>And one one interpretation of this text I was surprised

0:28:14.320 --> 0:28:18.000
<v Speaker 1>by was the fact that it's been uh is, there's

0:28:18.040 --> 0:28:21.399
<v Speaker 1>been used to drive home this idea that humans have

0:28:21.520 --> 0:28:28.120
<v Speaker 1>no responsibility towards animals, particularly uh suggested by St. Augustine

0:28:28.119 --> 0:28:32.600
<v Speaker 1>of Hippo. Augustine wrote, quote, Christ himself shows that to

0:28:32.720 --> 0:28:35.239
<v Speaker 1>refrain from the killing of animals and the destroying of

0:28:35.280 --> 0:28:38.479
<v Speaker 1>plants is the height of superstition. For judging that there

0:28:38.520 --> 0:28:41.240
<v Speaker 1>are no common rights between us and the beasts and trees,

0:28:41.560 --> 0:28:43.480
<v Speaker 1>he sent the devils into a herd of swine, and

0:28:43.520 --> 0:28:46.480
<v Speaker 1>with a curse, withered the tree on which he found

0:28:46.480 --> 0:28:49.880
<v Speaker 1>no fruit. Oh yeah, that's the withering of the fig tree, right,

0:28:49.920 --> 0:28:51.960
<v Speaker 1>which is a different story In the Bible, Jesus comes

0:28:52.000 --> 0:28:54.440
<v Speaker 1>across a fig tree. It says there were no figs

0:28:54.440 --> 0:28:56.880
<v Speaker 1>on the tree, for figs were not in season, and

0:28:57.000 --> 0:28:59.680
<v Speaker 1>Jesus becomes angry with the tree and he withers it. Yeah,

0:28:59.760 --> 0:29:02.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean he was having a bad day in that day. Well,

0:29:02.440 --> 0:29:04.600
<v Speaker 1>I think that story it to go back to what

0:29:04.640 --> 0:29:09.200
<v Speaker 1>authors actually intended versus how they're interpreted. I think a

0:29:09.200 --> 0:29:11.840
<v Speaker 1>lot of scholars think that that story was originally meant

0:29:11.880 --> 0:29:14.760
<v Speaker 1>to be like a metaphor for people who did not

0:29:14.960 --> 0:29:18.600
<v Speaker 1>bear good fruits. Right, so it's not literally about trees

0:29:18.920 --> 0:29:22.240
<v Speaker 1>or are showing off his abilities to wither fruit? Right?

0:29:22.840 --> 0:29:25.440
<v Speaker 1>At least yeah, at least under this interpretation, it seems

0:29:25.520 --> 0:29:28.600
<v Speaker 1>very a very plausible interpretation to me. But here Augustine's

0:29:28.640 --> 0:29:31.360
<v Speaker 1>running with it is like now it's literally about trees.

0:29:31.440 --> 0:29:34.120
<v Speaker 1>It's about how trees not worth nothing. You can do

0:29:34.160 --> 0:29:36.720
<v Speaker 1>whatever you want to them, it doesn't matter. Jesus showed

0:29:36.760 --> 0:29:40.360
<v Speaker 1>it in this parable. Yeah, seen, you can well imagine that.

0:29:40.480 --> 0:29:43.360
<v Speaker 1>Like Augustine like was kicking a pig or something or

0:29:43.400 --> 0:29:45.480
<v Speaker 1>a dog and someone say, hey, don't don't kick that dog,

0:29:45.520 --> 0:29:47.520
<v Speaker 1>and he's like, well, Jesus put a whole bunch of

0:29:47.560 --> 0:29:49.840
<v Speaker 1>demons in pigs and drove him off a cliff, So

0:29:50.240 --> 0:29:52.560
<v Speaker 1>I have free reign to kick as many dogs and

0:29:52.600 --> 0:29:56.280
<v Speaker 1>pigs as I see fit. Somebody like somebody shamed him

0:29:56.360 --> 0:29:59.120
<v Speaker 1>for letting his orchard with her, and then he's like,

0:29:59.160 --> 0:30:01.360
<v Speaker 1>I'll show you. When he goes and looks up the Bible,

0:30:01.440 --> 0:30:06.000
<v Speaker 1>He's like, look right here. So various authors have have

0:30:06.000 --> 0:30:10.960
<v Speaker 1>have taken issue with Augustine's interpretation here uh, Christian vegetarian

0:30:11.240 --> 0:30:15.040
<v Speaker 1>uh and Anglican priest Andrew Lindsay, author of Christianity and

0:30:15.080 --> 0:30:18.040
<v Speaker 1>the Rights of Animals. He counter argues and says, you know,

0:30:18.120 --> 0:30:21.040
<v Speaker 1>this is ridiculous. It's just propping up Augustine's prior opinion

0:30:21.080 --> 0:30:23.480
<v Speaker 1>that animals have no rights. And he contends that the

0:30:23.560 --> 0:30:27.520
<v Speaker 1>demons ultimately that they're selecting their own vessel here and

0:30:27.640 --> 0:30:31.560
<v Speaker 1>uh and did so because they were weaker creatures. Uh

0:30:31.960 --> 0:30:34.640
<v Speaker 1>and uh, you know, and obviously the demons themselves don't

0:30:34.640 --> 0:30:37.480
<v Speaker 1>care for animal rights. Meanwhile, he argues that there are

0:30:37.480 --> 0:30:39.960
<v Speaker 1>plenty of other passages where it's far easier to read

0:30:40.040 --> 0:30:42.920
<v Speaker 1>pro animal ideas in the words of Christ than it

0:30:43.000 --> 0:30:45.760
<v Speaker 1>is to uh, you know, to to to shoehorn in

0:30:45.920 --> 0:30:49.120
<v Speaker 1>an anti animal rights agenda. Well, there is one thing

0:30:49.160 --> 0:30:52.120
<v Speaker 1>that I actually do wonder about the story that's very interesting.

0:30:52.240 --> 0:30:55.280
<v Speaker 1>Is there supposed to be some kind of metaphorical or

0:30:55.320 --> 0:30:59.160
<v Speaker 1>theological meaning to the fact that the pigs, So that

0:30:59.320 --> 0:31:01.920
<v Speaker 1>Jesus sends the demons into the pigs where they asked

0:31:01.920 --> 0:31:04.760
<v Speaker 1>to go, He's like, okay, you can go into the pigs,

0:31:04.880 --> 0:31:06.560
<v Speaker 1>and then they go into the pigs, and then the

0:31:06.560 --> 0:31:10.560
<v Speaker 1>pigs immediately stampede and die. Why did they stampede and die?

0:31:10.880 --> 0:31:13.960
<v Speaker 1>Is there is that just like? Was that just added

0:31:14.000 --> 0:31:16.040
<v Speaker 1>to the story because like, okay, you know, that'd be

0:31:16.080 --> 0:31:18.200
<v Speaker 1>an interesting way to conclude it. And now the demons

0:31:18.200 --> 0:31:21.600
<v Speaker 1>are dealt with? Or was there some like meaning They're like,

0:31:21.720 --> 0:31:24.400
<v Speaker 1>does does this have something to do with the Romans

0:31:24.560 --> 0:31:26.680
<v Speaker 1>or with you know, yeah, because we already touched on

0:31:26.720 --> 0:31:28.920
<v Speaker 1>the connection between the Romans and pigs. We touched on

0:31:28.960 --> 0:31:32.720
<v Speaker 1>the connection between pigs and the location with the you know,

0:31:32.760 --> 0:31:35.840
<v Speaker 1>the the tombs. So and then also you always have

0:31:35.880 --> 0:31:37.640
<v Speaker 1>to wonder too with stories like this, like what what

0:31:37.760 --> 0:31:40.680
<v Speaker 1>other you know, pre existing narratives where they're out there

0:31:40.720 --> 0:31:43.520
<v Speaker 1>that have potentially been otherwise lost, that are reflected in

0:31:43.560 --> 0:31:47.960
<v Speaker 1>this story. Now, Thomas Aquinas, apparently I read thought that

0:31:48.000 --> 0:31:51.600
<v Speaker 1>this passage showed that Christ was primarily concerned with men

0:31:52.000 --> 0:31:55.560
<v Speaker 1>rather than pigs. But and and I've seen that pointed

0:31:55.600 --> 0:31:57.280
<v Speaker 1>out a few different places. But I was looking for

0:31:57.360 --> 0:32:00.120
<v Speaker 1>like a direct quote on this, and I was looking

0:32:00.160 --> 0:32:03.000
<v Speaker 1>at acquaintas his thoughts on the passage, and most of

0:32:03.040 --> 0:32:05.200
<v Speaker 1>it seemed to come down to him stressing the fact

0:32:05.200 --> 0:32:07.680
<v Speaker 1>that the pigs were unclean. So of course that's the

0:32:07.720 --> 0:32:10.160
<v Speaker 1>best place to send a bunch of demons. They love

0:32:10.320 --> 0:32:13.440
<v Speaker 1>unclean things. And it also shows shows he would he

0:32:13.520 --> 0:32:15.800
<v Speaker 1>argued that the devil can't kill you unless you present

0:32:15.840 --> 0:32:19.120
<v Speaker 1>yourself as an unclean animal. But I don't know that.

0:32:19.240 --> 0:32:21.440
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot of riffing on the scripture that I

0:32:21.600 --> 0:32:23.920
<v Speaker 1>ran across, but I'm not sure animal rights are the

0:32:24.000 --> 0:32:27.520
<v Speaker 1>lack thereof was the primary concern. Well, while we're on

0:32:27.560 --> 0:32:30.880
<v Speaker 1>the subject of the demonic oink, I think, uh, this

0:32:30.920 --> 0:32:33.200
<v Speaker 1>is a great opportunity to jump over to talking a

0:32:33.280 --> 0:32:37.360
<v Speaker 1>little bit about pig intelligence, pig behavior, and even a

0:32:37.480 --> 0:32:41.560
<v Speaker 1>very recent discovery about possible pig tool use. Yeah, yeah,

0:32:41.760 --> 0:32:43.720
<v Speaker 1>that that was. That was I think ultimately the the

0:32:44.480 --> 0:32:47.600
<v Speaker 1>bit of news that that made up my mind on

0:32:47.720 --> 0:32:50.480
<v Speaker 1>pursuing this as a topic. Yeah, so we've touched on

0:32:50.480 --> 0:32:53.160
<v Speaker 1>animal rights, we've touched on the notion of higher intelligence

0:32:53.200 --> 0:32:55.440
<v Speaker 1>in the form of demons being dropped into the bodies

0:32:55.480 --> 0:32:58.560
<v Speaker 1>of pigs. H Plus the notion that in some traditions

0:32:58.600 --> 0:33:01.640
<v Speaker 1>pigsy from journeying into the West is a product of reincarnation.

0:33:02.480 --> 0:33:05.200
<v Speaker 1>Uh So, having touched on these notions, you know, we

0:33:05.320 --> 0:33:07.320
<v Speaker 1>come back around to the question, well, how smart is

0:33:07.360 --> 0:33:10.480
<v Speaker 1>just a normal pig? You know, certainly I think we

0:33:10.520 --> 0:33:12.720
<v Speaker 1>can assume its brain is not on part of the humans.

0:33:12.920 --> 0:33:14.600
<v Speaker 1>We can more than assume that. We can state that.

0:33:15.360 --> 0:33:18.520
<v Speaker 1>But they're not the dumb animals we all we sometimes

0:33:18.520 --> 0:33:22.760
<v Speaker 1>take them for, uh the sort of comic relief. Look,

0:33:22.760 --> 0:33:24.560
<v Speaker 1>how dumb the pig is. It's covered in mud, it

0:33:24.600 --> 0:33:27.040
<v Speaker 1>lives in a pig pin. Well, I don't know if

0:33:27.040 --> 0:33:29.400
<v Speaker 1>this is actually a good explanation, but at least something

0:33:29.440 --> 0:33:33.240
<v Speaker 1>I've heard postulated in the past is what if the

0:33:33.560 --> 0:33:38.920
<v Speaker 1>common prohibitions on eating pigs in some religions stem from

0:33:38.960 --> 0:33:43.000
<v Speaker 1>not the uncleanness of pigs, but the similarity between pigs

0:33:43.000 --> 0:33:45.200
<v Speaker 1>and humans. I mean, there are a lot of sort

0:33:45.240 --> 0:33:49.360
<v Speaker 1>of biological and morphological similarities. For example, some pigs having

0:33:49.400 --> 0:33:51.960
<v Speaker 1>like fairly bare skin kind of like a less hair

0:33:52.120 --> 0:33:58.000
<v Speaker 1>than most mammals have unlike kind of like they're human cousins, uh,

0:33:58.440 --> 0:34:03.920
<v Speaker 1>just things. Oh apparently human meat tasting kind of like pork. Apparently.

0:34:04.280 --> 0:34:07.800
<v Speaker 1>I've also noticed that when a pig is butchered, uh,

0:34:08.000 --> 0:34:10.920
<v Speaker 1>sometimes its body looks like that of a of a

0:34:11.040 --> 0:34:13.520
<v Speaker 1>human um. Particularly ever, if you watch a lot of

0:34:13.520 --> 0:34:16.480
<v Speaker 1>like cooking shows on you know, very streaming channels, and

0:34:16.520 --> 0:34:19.440
<v Speaker 1>the inevitably there'll be a scene where someone has uh

0:34:19.719 --> 0:34:23.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, they're they're rolling out the slaughtered pig, or

0:34:23.520 --> 0:34:26.360
<v Speaker 1>then it's been prepared for the barbecue grill and it

0:34:26.400 --> 0:34:29.800
<v Speaker 1>looks alarmingly like a small person. Yeah, and so again,

0:34:29.840 --> 0:34:31.799
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if that really has all that much

0:34:31.840 --> 0:34:34.640
<v Speaker 1>explanatory power, but I can see that a little bit

0:34:34.719 --> 0:34:39.160
<v Speaker 1>like maybe we anthropomorphize pigs because it's just already pretty close.

0:34:39.239 --> 0:34:41.799
<v Speaker 1>There's a natural leap from humans to pigs, and boy

0:34:41.840 --> 0:34:43.840
<v Speaker 1>do we I mean, this has always disturbed me, the

0:34:44.000 --> 0:34:47.960
<v Speaker 1>level to which a barbecue restaurant will anthropomorphize a pig,

0:34:48.280 --> 0:34:51.200
<v Speaker 1>usually on the logo, where it'll be you know, it'll

0:34:51.239 --> 0:34:55.560
<v Speaker 1>be like smiling, happy humanoid pigs roaming around or even

0:34:55.719 --> 0:35:00.160
<v Speaker 1>doing grizzly things like cooking themselves or climbing into grills, Like,

0:35:00.200 --> 0:35:03.560
<v Speaker 1>what are you doing? Uh, you know you shouldn't you

0:35:03.600 --> 0:35:08.280
<v Speaker 1>be like distancing yourself from this notion that the pigs

0:35:08.280 --> 0:35:11.600
<v Speaker 1>are rational beings and you're eating them. Well, it makes

0:35:11.600 --> 0:35:14.200
<v Speaker 1>me think of the Chick fil A marketing strategy where

0:35:14.200 --> 0:35:17.240
<v Speaker 1>they would have the cows painting the signs. It's brilliant,

0:35:17.280 --> 0:35:21.080
<v Speaker 1>really anthropomorphized the other animal. That's that. That was I

0:35:21.120 --> 0:35:24.759
<v Speaker 1>think the wise choice. So also looking around a little

0:35:24.800 --> 0:35:28.440
<v Speaker 1>bit just on sort of pre existing um knowledge about

0:35:28.760 --> 0:35:31.160
<v Speaker 1>the intelligence of pigs, because there's there's been a lot

0:35:31.160 --> 0:35:34.919
<v Speaker 1>of data on this. So Barry Esterbrook wrote a book

0:35:34.920 --> 0:35:38.439
<v Speaker 1>called Pigtails which gets into all of this. Uh. He's

0:35:38.640 --> 0:35:41.719
<v Speaker 1>a science writer, and he points out some of the

0:35:41.760 --> 0:35:44.320
<v Speaker 1>big key points about peg behavior. First of all, pigs

0:35:44.320 --> 0:35:47.200
<v Speaker 1>have been taught to play computer games, and this gets

0:35:47.200 --> 0:35:49.320
<v Speaker 1>to to basically do it to the fact that pigs

0:35:49.360 --> 0:35:51.640
<v Speaker 1>have proven themselves to be very good at learning new task,

0:35:51.880 --> 0:35:55.080
<v Speaker 1>learning new tricks um, which is essentially what's going on

0:35:55.160 --> 0:35:57.160
<v Speaker 1>when they're playing a computer game and some of these

0:35:57.200 --> 0:36:01.080
<v Speaker 1>experiments they're trainable. Yeah, pigs have a sense of self

0:36:01.239 --> 0:36:05.040
<v Speaker 1>and they can recognize themselves in mirrors. They can also

0:36:05.080 --> 0:36:08.160
<v Speaker 1>figure out how a mirror works. I mean not in

0:36:08.280 --> 0:36:10.160
<v Speaker 1>terms of like how it's made and how it's like

0:36:10.560 --> 0:36:12.440
<v Speaker 1>the optics of it, but you know, they can they

0:36:12.480 --> 0:36:15.719
<v Speaker 1>can figure out what they're seeing through it and use

0:36:15.800 --> 0:36:19.239
<v Speaker 1>it to identify food. Oh really, so they can recognize

0:36:19.280 --> 0:36:21.840
<v Speaker 1>that the mirror is a reflection of what's you know,

0:36:21.920 --> 0:36:25.399
<v Speaker 1>behind them and stuff. Yeah, and also pigs can look

0:36:25.440 --> 0:36:28.480
<v Speaker 1>at another pig and calculate what that pig might do

0:36:28.680 --> 0:36:31.600
<v Speaker 1>or how it might act. A two thousand sixteen University

0:36:31.600 --> 0:36:34.240
<v Speaker 1>of Lincoln study found that, as with humans, the pig's

0:36:34.320 --> 0:36:38.799
<v Speaker 1>judgment and decisions are governed by mood and personality type. Uh.

0:36:38.920 --> 0:36:41.480
<v Speaker 1>They're also proven to be really good remembering where food

0:36:41.520 --> 0:36:44.279
<v Speaker 1>stores are, and not only that, how they rate in

0:36:44.440 --> 0:36:46.600
<v Speaker 1>size to each other. So it's not just a matter

0:36:46.640 --> 0:36:49.520
<v Speaker 1>of like, oh, there's some the researchers put so much food,

0:36:49.719 --> 0:36:51.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, put put food here and here and here. No,

0:36:52.200 --> 0:36:54.839
<v Speaker 1>they can remember the proportions as well, you can rank

0:36:54.880 --> 0:36:57.719
<v Speaker 1>them in their their heads um. And they're also really

0:36:57.760 --> 0:37:00.640
<v Speaker 1>good at deceiving each other when it comes to food. Oh,

0:37:00.760 --> 0:37:03.040
<v Speaker 1>how does that work? Basically comes down to the fact

0:37:03.040 --> 0:37:06.640
<v Speaker 1>that they're they're intelligent animals, but they're also highly social animals.

0:37:07.200 --> 0:37:11.319
<v Speaker 1>So you know they in the wild, wild hogs are

0:37:11.360 --> 0:37:15.600
<v Speaker 1>not living in seclusion. They're living in contact with one another. Uh,

0:37:15.640 --> 0:37:21.200
<v Speaker 1>so they are social creatures. And on the subject of domestication, Uh,

0:37:21.320 --> 0:37:25.839
<v Speaker 1>the domesticated pig diverge from wild hogs somewhere like eight

0:37:25.880 --> 0:37:29.760
<v Speaker 1>thousand years ago. That's that's when we began domesticating pigs

0:37:30.239 --> 0:37:32.480
<v Speaker 1>and uh, and it's it is kind of impressive that

0:37:32.520 --> 0:37:35.439
<v Speaker 1>we haven't managed to domesticate the smarts out of them,

0:37:35.440 --> 0:37:40.320
<v Speaker 1>like they're like, even the domesticated pig is an intelligent creature. Well,

0:37:40.360 --> 0:37:42.759
<v Speaker 1>maybe we should explore more of that intelligence after we

0:37:42.800 --> 0:37:44.800
<v Speaker 1>come back from a break and we can talk about

0:37:44.800 --> 0:37:51.080
<v Speaker 1>pigs and tool use. Than all right, we're back. So

0:37:51.239 --> 0:37:55.600
<v Speaker 1>tool use this is uh, this is really fascinating because

0:37:55.640 --> 0:37:59.160
<v Speaker 1>of course tool use is our thing the humans. Tools

0:37:59.160 --> 0:38:02.560
<v Speaker 1>are the things we use to build our barbecue restaurants

0:38:02.600 --> 0:38:05.160
<v Speaker 1>and to slaughter pigs and then to cook pigs and

0:38:05.200 --> 0:38:07.640
<v Speaker 1>serve pigs and then to eat pigs. But apparently it

0:38:07.640 --> 0:38:11.240
<v Speaker 1>takes no tools to cast demons from a human into pigs.

0:38:11.520 --> 0:38:15.000
<v Speaker 1>We're not told there's a wand involved or anything. So yeah, Robert,

0:38:15.040 --> 0:38:17.680
<v Speaker 1>I I found out about this interesting report on pig

0:38:17.719 --> 0:38:20.839
<v Speaker 1>intelligence recently, I think because you shared it with me. Yeah,

0:38:20.840 --> 0:38:23.400
<v Speaker 1>the day it came out, I I shared it with

0:38:23.440 --> 0:38:26.279
<v Speaker 1>our our Facebook group. Stuff to Blow your mind a

0:38:26.320 --> 0:38:28.560
<v Speaker 1>discussion module, which is a place you can go if

0:38:28.560 --> 0:38:31.080
<v Speaker 1>you want to discuss episodes of the show and uh,

0:38:31.080 --> 0:38:34.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, sort of related studies with other listeners. Uh So,

0:38:34.800 --> 0:38:38.200
<v Speaker 1>for some background talking about tool use. Tool use is

0:38:38.239 --> 0:38:40.360
<v Speaker 1>often taken, of course, is one of the most interesting

0:38:40.360 --> 0:38:44.160
<v Speaker 1>and most important signs of higher intelligence and animals. It's

0:38:44.239 --> 0:38:47.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's I think fairly plausibly argued to be

0:38:47.719 --> 0:38:51.759
<v Speaker 1>one of the main things that makes humans very special. Right.

0:38:52.239 --> 0:38:55.319
<v Speaker 1>We've got language, we've got tool use, right, But we're

0:38:55.360 --> 0:38:58.560
<v Speaker 1>not the only animals that use tools. A few non

0:38:58.640 --> 0:39:01.760
<v Speaker 1>human animals show pretty clear or undisputed use of tools.

0:39:02.400 --> 0:39:07.320
<v Speaker 1>Of course. One great example is other primates, right, like chimpanzees, binobo's, orangutans,

0:39:07.320 --> 0:39:10.160
<v Speaker 1>and even I think you know, guerrillas, and some monkeys

0:39:10.200 --> 0:39:13.960
<v Speaker 1>and stuff. Chimpanzees will sometimes like use large rocks to

0:39:14.040 --> 0:39:18.880
<v Speaker 1>crush nutshells, use sticks for hunting or for fishing insects

0:39:18.920 --> 0:39:22.400
<v Speaker 1>or other prey out of crevices and enclosures. We've also

0:39:22.520 --> 0:39:25.960
<v Speaker 1>extensively covered tool use in some bird species in the past.

0:39:26.000 --> 0:39:27.920
<v Speaker 1>If you want to learn more, you can check out

0:39:27.960 --> 0:39:31.719
<v Speaker 1>our older episodes on the Unsettling depths of bird intelligence.

0:39:31.760 --> 0:39:34.440
<v Speaker 1>I think it was called Yes. The primary examples here

0:39:34.440 --> 0:39:38.600
<v Speaker 1>are birds like Corvid's and parrots. Great example is the

0:39:38.600 --> 0:39:41.160
<v Speaker 1>new Caledonian crow, which has been involved in a lot

0:39:41.200 --> 0:39:44.000
<v Speaker 1>of research. They can use sticks or bark for rooting

0:39:44.000 --> 0:39:48.280
<v Speaker 1>around inside crevices, fishing for insects and larvae. Uh, sometimes

0:39:48.360 --> 0:39:52.520
<v Speaker 1>even displaying really startling levels of abstraction. I believe there

0:39:52.520 --> 0:39:56.760
<v Speaker 1>are examples of them constructing tools, like putting things together

0:39:56.920 --> 0:40:00.720
<v Speaker 1>to make tools, or using one tool not to get food,

0:40:00.840 --> 0:40:04.319
<v Speaker 1>but to access a second, better tool which can be

0:40:04.440 --> 0:40:07.759
<v Speaker 1>used to get food. I mean that's interesting. Yeah, And

0:40:08.040 --> 0:40:11.000
<v Speaker 1>of course there are other mammals. Marine mammals like cetaceans

0:40:11.080 --> 0:40:14.080
<v Speaker 1>also sometimes display behaviors that might count as tool use.

0:40:14.480 --> 0:40:18.719
<v Speaker 1>I think you've mentioned before dolphins, like using sponges as tools. Yeah,

0:40:18.760 --> 0:40:21.080
<v Speaker 1>that definitely comes up. What was the it's basically like

0:40:21.120 --> 0:40:24.920
<v Speaker 1>for sea floor foraging. I believe so. Yeah, I'm I'm

0:40:24.920 --> 0:40:27.000
<v Speaker 1>a little foggy on the details of that one, but

0:40:27.000 --> 0:40:29.040
<v Speaker 1>but there is a there's definitely a case that has

0:40:29.080 --> 0:40:32.319
<v Speaker 1>been made for tool use by dolphins, even the octopus.

0:40:32.360 --> 0:40:36.800
<v Speaker 1>Actually it's invertebrate tool use. Uh. The octopus for example,

0:40:37.040 --> 0:40:40.439
<v Speaker 1>well sometimes carry shells or like coconut shells with them

0:40:40.440 --> 0:40:43.640
<v Speaker 1>to fold over their bodies to use as shelter, armor,

0:40:43.760 --> 0:40:47.759
<v Speaker 1>hunting blind uh. And then there are more arguable examples

0:40:47.800 --> 0:40:50.279
<v Speaker 1>of things that might or might not be tool used,

0:40:50.280 --> 0:40:53.440
<v Speaker 1>depending on your criteria. I mean, if you really stretch it,

0:40:53.480 --> 0:40:57.000
<v Speaker 1>like sometimes even reptiles like croc crocodilians are alleged to

0:40:57.080 --> 0:40:59.520
<v Speaker 1>use tools. But I think not everyone would agree on

0:41:00.280 --> 0:41:04.200
<v Speaker 1>whether these behaviors count. But maybe the newest, most surprising

0:41:04.239 --> 0:41:07.239
<v Speaker 1>discovery of animal tool use as of the day we're

0:41:07.239 --> 0:41:10.719
<v Speaker 1>recording this is this very recent documentation of tool use

0:41:10.800 --> 0:41:14.719
<v Speaker 1>by pigs. So what would count as tool use? Well,

0:41:15.040 --> 0:41:17.360
<v Speaker 1>I was reading a great article about this new discovery

0:41:17.360 --> 0:41:19.960
<v Speaker 1>and nat GEO by Christine Delamore. I think this is

0:41:20.000 --> 0:41:22.520
<v Speaker 1>the best article I've found about the this new research,

0:41:22.960 --> 0:41:26.840
<v Speaker 1>and she cites a definition here which seems very reasonable

0:41:26.880 --> 0:41:28.960
<v Speaker 1>to me. So the definition of tool use here is

0:41:29.000 --> 0:41:34.280
<v Speaker 1>quote the exertion of control over a freely manipulable external object,

0:41:34.480 --> 0:41:37.839
<v Speaker 1>which is the tool, with the goal of altering the

0:41:37.880 --> 0:41:42.759
<v Speaker 1>physical properties of another object, substance, surface, or medium via

0:41:42.800 --> 0:41:47.719
<v Speaker 1>a dynamic mechanical interaction, or to mediating the flow of information,

0:41:48.560 --> 0:41:51.040
<v Speaker 1>which sounds a little complicated, but basically means you've got

0:41:51.040 --> 0:41:53.080
<v Speaker 1>to use an object that's not part of your body,

0:41:53.160 --> 0:41:56.480
<v Speaker 1>an object from the outside, to make changes to your

0:41:56.600 --> 0:42:02.759
<v Speaker 1>environment or objects in your environment, or to control information somehow. Now,

0:42:03.000 --> 0:42:05.480
<v Speaker 1>if you're wondering, like, how can information work, I believe

0:42:05.480 --> 0:42:08.480
<v Speaker 1>that would mean, for example, by changing what can be

0:42:08.560 --> 0:42:11.840
<v Speaker 1>seen and by whom. So if you use an object

0:42:12.239 --> 0:42:15.360
<v Speaker 1>to help you see something you couldn't otherwise see, or

0:42:15.440 --> 0:42:19.200
<v Speaker 1>to keep somebody else from seeing something, like you put

0:42:19.280 --> 0:42:23.120
<v Speaker 1>up something to hide yourself, that could be considered tool use. Right.

0:42:23.160 --> 0:42:25.360
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, Like so the idea of say the octopus

0:42:25.400 --> 0:42:29.640
<v Speaker 1>climbing inside of a coconut is arguably an example of this, right,

0:42:29.680 --> 0:42:32.719
<v Speaker 1>And I think though there would be differences between, Like

0:42:33.400 --> 0:42:36.239
<v Speaker 1>going into a hole is not tool used, so you

0:42:36.280 --> 0:42:38.319
<v Speaker 1>could be hiding there. I think it would be like

0:42:38.360 --> 0:42:40.960
<v Speaker 1>if you carry along a thing with you that you

0:42:41.000 --> 0:42:44.240
<v Speaker 1>can hide inside. But then even then you run into

0:42:44.360 --> 0:42:47.120
<v Speaker 1>some difficulties. I mean, when you see an octopus doing that,

0:42:47.120 --> 0:42:49.360
<v Speaker 1>that seems like tool use. But when a hermit crab

0:42:49.440 --> 0:42:52.520
<v Speaker 1>doesn't that that doesn't seem like tool use, right, So

0:42:52.560 --> 0:42:55.520
<v Speaker 1>they're they're like, uh, They're always going to be these

0:42:55.560 --> 0:42:58.880
<v Speaker 1>difficulties with these edge cases about what counts and what doesn't.

0:42:58.920 --> 0:43:00.440
<v Speaker 1>So there's a lot of arguing, I think in the

0:43:00.440 --> 0:43:03.040
<v Speaker 1>scientific literature about does this case count or does it

0:43:03.160 --> 0:43:06.479
<v Speaker 1>not count and why? But anyway, this new research about

0:43:06.520 --> 0:43:10.800
<v Speaker 1>pig tool use originates with a conservation ecologist named Meredith

0:43:10.840 --> 0:43:16.919
<v Speaker 1>root Bernstein who in October of was at a zoo

0:43:16.960 --> 0:43:20.760
<v Speaker 1>in Paris. She was observing a group of vision wardy

0:43:20.920 --> 0:43:24.880
<v Speaker 1>pigs at this Parisian zoo and Visayan warty pigs are

0:43:24.920 --> 0:43:28.759
<v Speaker 1>a critically endangered species of wild pig native to the Philippines.

0:43:28.800 --> 0:43:32.360
<v Speaker 1>They're critically endangered, like so many other creatures, because of

0:43:32.480 --> 0:43:36.880
<v Speaker 1>habitat destruction. It's the ruin of their natural rainforest homeland

0:43:37.040 --> 0:43:39.640
<v Speaker 1>that has driven them to this point. You may have

0:43:39.640 --> 0:43:42.719
<v Speaker 1>actually seen images of them. The males of the species

0:43:43.080 --> 0:43:46.279
<v Speaker 1>often have a natural mohawk hairdo running down the length

0:43:46.320 --> 0:43:48.560
<v Speaker 1>of their bodies, so they look pretty cool. Yeah, yeah,

0:43:48.560 --> 0:43:52.000
<v Speaker 1>they look pretty rough and tumble. But this group observed

0:43:52.040 --> 0:43:55.160
<v Speaker 1>by root Bernstein, they were in captivity and that's important

0:43:55.160 --> 0:43:58.600
<v Speaker 1>to remember because that can sometimes change animal behavior. I've

0:43:58.600 --> 0:44:00.200
<v Speaker 1>got an image, by the way for you to look

0:44:00.200 --> 0:44:03.600
<v Speaker 1>at here, Robert. The hair is mighty. Absolutely, I would

0:44:03.640 --> 0:44:06.120
<v Speaker 1>go as far as to say that this particular hog

0:44:06.239 --> 0:44:10.839
<v Speaker 1>looks rad This hog could play with some kind of like, uh,

0:44:11.239 --> 0:44:14.080
<v Speaker 1>some kind of minor tough and a Russell Mulkahi movie.

0:44:14.800 --> 0:44:17.960
<v Speaker 1>So in October fifteen, root Burnstein she was at this

0:44:18.040 --> 0:44:20.600
<v Speaker 1>zooe and she noticed one of the pigs in this

0:44:20.760 --> 0:44:23.839
<v Speaker 1>enclosure picking up a piece of tree bark with its

0:44:23.880 --> 0:44:27.120
<v Speaker 1>mouth and then using the bark as a spade to

0:44:27.280 --> 0:44:30.319
<v Speaker 1>dig around in the soil within its enclosure. Uh. The

0:44:30.360 --> 0:44:33.520
<v Speaker 1>pig was named Priscilla, by the way, and Priscilla's mate

0:44:33.680 --> 0:44:37.880
<v Speaker 1>was named Billy. So the French are good at naming pigs. Actually,

0:44:37.960 --> 0:44:39.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if the French name them, but Priscilla

0:44:40.000 --> 0:44:41.640
<v Speaker 1>and Billy, and then of course there were there were

0:44:41.640 --> 0:44:45.000
<v Speaker 1>younger pigs and the enclosure too. But root Burnstein, so

0:44:45.040 --> 0:44:47.919
<v Speaker 1>she saw this happening, the pig picking up the bark

0:44:47.960 --> 0:44:50.120
<v Speaker 1>with its mouth and digging with it, and she never

0:44:50.200 --> 0:44:53.320
<v Speaker 1>heard of documented tool use in any species of pigs.

0:44:53.320 --> 0:44:55.400
<v Speaker 1>So she went home to look it up, and she

0:44:55.400 --> 0:44:58.960
<v Speaker 1>couldn't find anything in the animal behavior literature, so she

0:44:59.040 --> 0:45:02.240
<v Speaker 1>kept returning to the zoo and documenting the pig's behavior

0:45:02.360 --> 0:45:05.000
<v Speaker 1>with the help of colleagues. But for several months she

0:45:05.040 --> 0:45:08.080
<v Speaker 1>never saw it happen again. So what was going on here? Well?

0:45:08.320 --> 0:45:11.880
<v Speaker 1>Delamore writes that Rude Bernstein suspected that the digging behavior

0:45:12.320 --> 0:45:15.160
<v Speaker 1>was part of the pigs nest building process. And of

0:45:15.160 --> 0:45:17.960
<v Speaker 1>course nest building doesn't happen year round. It's not all

0:45:17.960 --> 0:45:20.440
<v Speaker 1>the time, it's whenever there is a new litter of

0:45:20.440 --> 0:45:23.520
<v Speaker 1>piglets coming, and this happens about twice a year. So

0:45:23.719 --> 0:45:26.360
<v Speaker 1>root Bernstein and her colleagues waited, and in the following

0:45:26.400 --> 0:45:29.600
<v Speaker 1>spring they did, in fact observe tool use. Yet again,

0:45:30.120 --> 0:45:33.000
<v Speaker 1>three of the four pigs in the enclosure we're using

0:45:33.080 --> 0:45:36.560
<v Speaker 1>bark to help dig out their nests bark or sticks.

0:45:36.600 --> 0:45:40.560
<v Speaker 1>So does digging with bark count as tool use? We

0:45:40.600 --> 0:45:42.319
<v Speaker 1>can look in more detail in a minute, but yes,

0:45:42.480 --> 0:45:45.200
<v Speaker 1>I think it meets the regular criteria right. It's using

0:45:45.280 --> 0:45:49.120
<v Speaker 1>an object outside the body, a freely manipulable object to

0:45:49.440 --> 0:45:53.120
<v Speaker 1>change the environment, and there's no doubt that they're doing it.

0:45:53.200 --> 0:45:56.000
<v Speaker 1>There's video you can watch online. Though they do seem

0:45:56.000 --> 0:45:58.800
<v Speaker 1>a little clumsy at it. They don't look like hyper

0:45:59.040 --> 0:46:02.560
<v Speaker 1>like dexterrous tool users. It's more kind of like they're

0:46:02.560 --> 0:46:05.279
<v Speaker 1>flipping the stick all over the place and it kind

0:46:05.320 --> 0:46:08.400
<v Speaker 1>of moves the dirt around, which does make me wonder

0:46:08.719 --> 0:46:12.399
<v Speaker 1>what did tool use look like when like our ancestors

0:46:12.480 --> 0:46:17.040
<v Speaker 1>first started doing it, just like, you know, wildly swinging

0:46:17.080 --> 0:46:20.239
<v Speaker 1>things around and occasionally getting some benefit out of it. Well,

0:46:20.280 --> 0:46:22.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think a lot of us probably fit

0:46:22.640 --> 0:46:25.960
<v Speaker 1>that description when we use, you know, a particular utensil

0:46:26.040 --> 0:46:27.920
<v Speaker 1>or go after a particular task in the kitchen that

0:46:28.000 --> 0:46:30.840
<v Speaker 1>we don't normally do. Like I was grading a sweet

0:46:30.880 --> 0:46:33.360
<v Speaker 1>potato last night, and I feel like that was basically

0:46:33.440 --> 0:46:36.240
<v Speaker 1>what was happening. People who were observing it might think, wow,

0:46:36.600 --> 0:46:43.359
<v Speaker 1>this this uh, this ape can barely manipulate this tool. Uh.

0:46:43.440 --> 0:46:46.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if this counts. Is too using intelligence? Yes?

0:46:46.280 --> 0:46:50.000
<v Speaker 1>Is it tool using intelligence? Or is it just occasionally

0:46:50.080 --> 0:46:52.759
<v Speaker 1>rubbing and fumbling this piece of the metal against the

0:46:52.960 --> 0:46:55.959
<v Speaker 1>this tuber. We're not sure, Robert, or your knuckles, Okay,

0:46:55.960 --> 0:46:58.280
<v Speaker 1>did you lose an they knuckles? Lucky, my my knuckles,

0:46:58.640 --> 0:47:03.160
<v Speaker 1>my skin, that's all fine, But that potato did suffer

0:47:03.400 --> 0:47:06.000
<v Speaker 1>I have lost a knuckler two to the greater before.

0:47:06.360 --> 0:47:09.760
<v Speaker 1>But my my point being, uh, you don't have to be, uh,

0:47:09.800 --> 0:47:11.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, an artful user of a tool to be

0:47:12.080 --> 0:47:15.160
<v Speaker 1>a tool user, right, Uh, you know, that's exactly right.

0:47:15.480 --> 0:47:18.480
<v Speaker 1>So rut Bernstein and her co authors published their research

0:47:18.520 --> 0:47:22.000
<v Speaker 1>in the journal Mammalian Biology in September twenty nineteen, and

0:47:22.040 --> 0:47:26.600
<v Speaker 1>so all the authors were Meredith Root Bernstein, A Trumpteen, Narayan,

0:47:26.840 --> 0:47:31.200
<v Speaker 1>Lucille Cornier, and Audi Bourgeois. The article is called context

0:47:31.280 --> 0:47:35.680
<v Speaker 1>specific tool use in sus Sebifrons in Mammalian Biology and

0:47:35.719 --> 0:47:38.320
<v Speaker 1>that this was published just in September in twenty nineteen,

0:47:38.680 --> 0:47:41.799
<v Speaker 1>so specifically, what's going on with the digging process here? Well,

0:47:41.840 --> 0:47:45.000
<v Speaker 1>the things become kind of interesting. So the authors documented

0:47:45.040 --> 0:47:48.120
<v Speaker 1>pigs using tools to dig four times in twenty sixteen

0:47:48.120 --> 0:47:51.560
<v Speaker 1>and seven times in twenty seventeen, and it seems that

0:47:51.600 --> 0:47:54.600
<v Speaker 1>the tool use always came in the middle of the

0:47:54.640 --> 0:47:58.919
<v Speaker 1>nest to digging process. Ultimately, of course, the nest they're

0:47:58.920 --> 0:48:01.759
<v Speaker 1>producing is going to be like a little dugout pit

0:48:01.880 --> 0:48:04.080
<v Speaker 1>and that's gonna be lined with leaves and that's where

0:48:04.080 --> 0:48:06.719
<v Speaker 1>the pig let's go. Uh. They also observed that the

0:48:06.800 --> 0:48:10.120
<v Speaker 1>male pigs digging was clumsier and less productive than the

0:48:10.160 --> 0:48:13.239
<v Speaker 1>digging by the females. Uh. It also seemed that the

0:48:13.400 --> 0:48:16.919
<v Speaker 1>knowledge about how to use the digging implements was being

0:48:17.120 --> 0:48:22.160
<v Speaker 1>passed on both vertically from mother to offspring and horizontally

0:48:22.239 --> 0:48:26.000
<v Speaker 1>by being taught to the males by the females. Interesting.

0:48:26.200 --> 0:48:29.799
<v Speaker 1>They also introduced foreign objects into the enclosure, like they

0:48:29.800 --> 0:48:33.040
<v Speaker 1>put spatulas in there to see if the pigs would

0:48:33.040 --> 0:48:35.200
<v Speaker 1>try to use them. Apparently they did sort of a

0:48:35.239 --> 0:48:37.560
<v Speaker 1>couple of times, but they seemed to prefer the sticks

0:48:37.560 --> 0:48:40.400
<v Speaker 1>in the bark. Yeah, I mean a spatulist seems like

0:48:40.440 --> 0:48:42.320
<v Speaker 1>it would It would not be the best tool anyway

0:48:42.360 --> 0:48:45.000
<v Speaker 1>for that task. Oh, I don't know. You could dig

0:48:45.040 --> 0:48:48.080
<v Speaker 1>in loose soil okay with a spatula okay, but like

0:48:48.120 --> 0:48:50.520
<v Speaker 1>a metal spoon would be better. Yeah, but biting on

0:48:50.560 --> 0:48:53.239
<v Speaker 1>a metal spoon might hurt us in their mouth. Yeah,

0:48:53.239 --> 0:48:56.160
<v Speaker 1>we're still giving them a human tool of and and

0:48:56.239 --> 0:48:58.239
<v Speaker 1>this this is a creature that that is using a

0:48:58.239 --> 0:49:00.440
<v Speaker 1>tool in a in a different manner. We need to

0:49:00.440 --> 0:49:04.000
<v Speaker 1>make special pig digging mecca suits. Then we'll really see

0:49:04.040 --> 0:49:07.360
<v Speaker 1>how far their tool using intelligence goes. But The authors

0:49:07.440 --> 0:49:11.520
<v Speaker 1>argued that the observed behaviors do meet the best definition

0:49:11.520 --> 0:49:13.360
<v Speaker 1>of tool use. And I want to read a quote

0:49:13.400 --> 0:49:16.000
<v Speaker 1>about how they explain this. They say, Uh, it is

0:49:16.040 --> 0:49:18.960
<v Speaker 1>tool use quote, because it involved the manipulation of an

0:49:18.960 --> 0:49:22.279
<v Speaker 1>external object, the bark, the stick, or the spatula. It

0:49:22.360 --> 0:49:28.360
<v Speaker 1>occurred exclusively and regularly within a goal oriented, repeated action pattern. Okay,

0:49:28.400 --> 0:49:30.560
<v Speaker 1>so it's not just like they're running around with sticks

0:49:30.560 --> 0:49:32.880
<v Speaker 1>in their mouths all the time and occasionally it moves

0:49:32.920 --> 0:49:36.439
<v Speaker 1>some soil. It only happens sometimes and only when they're

0:49:36.480 --> 0:49:39.640
<v Speaker 1>digging nests. And to continue with their quote, they say,

0:49:39.760 --> 0:49:43.200
<v Speaker 1>and as its end result, it altered both the distribution

0:49:43.239 --> 0:49:45.640
<v Speaker 1>of the soil to make a pit and the physical

0:49:45.680 --> 0:49:50.320
<v Speaker 1>properties of the tool user a physical disposition digging action,

0:49:50.680 --> 0:49:54.759
<v Speaker 1>and thus it likely also included information transfer to the

0:49:54.760 --> 0:49:58.640
<v Speaker 1>tool user in the form of appropriate receptive feedback different

0:49:58.680 --> 0:50:01.840
<v Speaker 1>to that without tool use. So there's an information thing again,

0:50:01.880 --> 0:50:05.239
<v Speaker 1>like using the stick to have a different method of

0:50:05.280 --> 0:50:08.040
<v Speaker 1>like feeling how deep the hole is and stuff. So

0:50:08.080 --> 0:50:13.280
<v Speaker 1>one question is how has this behavior escaped attention so long? Uh?

0:50:13.320 --> 0:50:16.600
<v Speaker 1>In Delamore's article, she mentions that well, wild pigs are

0:50:16.680 --> 0:50:20.840
<v Speaker 1>sometimes understudied so maybe that's the case. But also, you know,

0:50:20.920 --> 0:50:23.439
<v Speaker 1>one thing to think about is these pigs are in captivity.

0:50:23.719 --> 0:50:27.960
<v Speaker 1>Animals in captivity also sometimes show behaviors that the same

0:50:28.080 --> 0:50:31.120
<v Speaker 1>animals do not exhibit in the wild. But then again,

0:50:31.200 --> 0:50:33.920
<v Speaker 1>it seemed like the bark was only used for digging

0:50:34.000 --> 0:50:37.200
<v Speaker 1>nests and only at a specific stage in the nest

0:50:37.239 --> 0:50:40.239
<v Speaker 1>building process, which makes it pretty different from most of

0:50:40.239 --> 0:50:43.520
<v Speaker 1>the repetitive, compulsive types of behaviors that you would see

0:50:43.560 --> 0:50:47.160
<v Speaker 1>induced by captivity. Right. Yeah, it's not not a situation

0:50:47.160 --> 0:50:49.160
<v Speaker 1>where these pigs were doing this all the time. They

0:50:49.160 --> 0:50:52.000
<v Speaker 1>were only doing it like every six months during their

0:50:52.160 --> 0:50:55.880
<v Speaker 1>their nest building activities. Right. It's not the panther pacing

0:50:55.920 --> 0:50:57.680
<v Speaker 1>in its cage in the way that it would not

0:50:57.719 --> 0:51:00.960
<v Speaker 1>pace in the wild. So the question is do we

0:51:01.080 --> 0:51:04.720
<v Speaker 1>find examples of these endangered pigs or other related pigs

0:51:05.160 --> 0:51:08.120
<v Speaker 1>using tools in the wild. I think this is the

0:51:08.160 --> 0:51:11.760
<v Speaker 1>first really documented case that's clear. But in her article,

0:51:11.840 --> 0:51:15.440
<v Speaker 1>Delamore notes an interesting anecdote from somebody. She talks to,

0:51:15.600 --> 0:51:19.800
<v Speaker 1>somebody named Fernando Dino Gutierrez who's president of the Philippine

0:51:19.840 --> 0:51:23.880
<v Speaker 1>conservation group known as the Tallara Foundation. And so here's

0:51:23.920 --> 0:51:26.920
<v Speaker 1>this story. Quoting from Delmore's article uh quote. A few

0:51:27.000 --> 0:51:29.800
<v Speaker 1>years ago, Gautierra has witnessed a group of wild pigs

0:51:29.880 --> 0:51:34.359
<v Speaker 1>pushing rocks toward an electric fence to test it. And

0:51:34.360 --> 0:51:37.000
<v Speaker 1>Gautierra says, as soon as they push and the rocks

0:51:37.040 --> 0:51:40.319
<v Speaker 1>make contact, they would wait for the clicking sound or

0:51:40.360 --> 0:51:44.160
<v Speaker 1>absence thereof clicking means the wires are hot and they

0:51:44.160 --> 0:51:47.120
<v Speaker 1>will back off and not cross. No sounds mean it

0:51:47.239 --> 0:51:50.759
<v Speaker 1>is safe to investigate what's beyond the wire. So that

0:51:50.800 --> 0:51:54.040
<v Speaker 1>seems like pigs using like possible edge case there of

0:51:54.160 --> 0:52:00.440
<v Speaker 1>pigs using tools to mediate the flow of information. They

0:52:00.440 --> 0:52:05.799
<v Speaker 1>were testing the fences systematically for weaknesses they remember. But

0:52:05.920 --> 0:52:09.160
<v Speaker 1>as for whether these specific pigs, the vision warty pigs

0:52:09.200 --> 0:52:11.200
<v Speaker 1>do this kind of thing in the wild, I think

0:52:11.200 --> 0:52:13.359
<v Speaker 1>we don't really know that. Of course, there aren't many

0:52:13.400 --> 0:52:14.880
<v Speaker 1>of them in the wild. I think there might just

0:52:14.920 --> 0:52:17.600
<v Speaker 1>be a few hundred that their numbers are not really known.

0:52:18.440 --> 0:52:21.800
<v Speaker 1>But wild pig scientists of the world, combine your powers,

0:52:21.880 --> 0:52:25.479
<v Speaker 1>figure this out, plunge the depths of pig technology. Yeah,

0:52:25.600 --> 0:52:28.200
<v Speaker 1>it would be would be wonderful to hear more about this,

0:52:28.280 --> 0:52:30.880
<v Speaker 1>and certainly to hear about how it's occurring in the wild.

0:52:31.280 --> 0:52:33.839
<v Speaker 1>Now there's one last thing though, that makes this even

0:52:33.920 --> 0:52:38.520
<v Speaker 1>more interesting. It's not clear to root Bernstein and her

0:52:38.560 --> 0:52:42.000
<v Speaker 1>co authors that the bark or the stick provides much

0:52:42.040 --> 0:52:46.240
<v Speaker 1>of a utilitarian advantage, if any. According to the study,

0:52:46.280 --> 0:52:49.279
<v Speaker 1>it seemed digging with the stick was sometimes less efficient

0:52:49.680 --> 0:52:52.399
<v Speaker 1>than digging with the hoofs or with the snout, which

0:52:52.400 --> 0:52:54.399
<v Speaker 1>is of course what they would normally use. I think

0:52:54.760 --> 0:52:56.600
<v Speaker 1>so if and again you can see this if you

0:52:56.600 --> 0:52:59.560
<v Speaker 1>watch the video. The digging does sort of work, but

0:52:59.680 --> 0:53:01.880
<v Speaker 1>it also it looks kind of bumbling and funny, and

0:53:01.960 --> 0:53:04.680
<v Speaker 1>you can imagine that digging with the snout or the

0:53:04.719 --> 0:53:07.480
<v Speaker 1>hoofs would actually be pretty quick. So if the bark

0:53:07.560 --> 0:53:11.520
<v Speaker 1>isn't necessarily speeding up the digging process even though it

0:53:11.640 --> 0:53:14.240
<v Speaker 1>is working, it's if it's not making the process faster

0:53:14.440 --> 0:53:18.399
<v Speaker 1>or more efficient, why do it at all. One thing

0:53:18.440 --> 0:53:20.560
<v Speaker 1>that occurred to me is why, well, maybe the snout

0:53:20.560 --> 0:53:23.359
<v Speaker 1>gets sore. I mean, that could be a thing. Yeah, yeah,

0:53:23.360 --> 0:53:27.080
<v Speaker 1>that's that's one possibility. M One also wonders, of course,

0:53:27.160 --> 0:53:30.279
<v Speaker 1>if if there is something communicated through the act of

0:53:30.400 --> 0:53:32.760
<v Speaker 1>using the tool, and it's some sort of like a

0:53:33.000 --> 0:53:37.560
<v Speaker 1>physical mental fitness communication. Yeah, that's a that's an interesting thing.

0:53:37.640 --> 0:53:40.560
<v Speaker 1>So this could be tool use that actually, even though

0:53:40.560 --> 0:53:45.799
<v Speaker 1>it's tool use, doesn't exist primarily for utilitarian advantage. What

0:53:45.920 --> 0:53:50.040
<v Speaker 1>if this is just a learned animal cultural behavior. Sometimes

0:53:50.080 --> 0:53:53.120
<v Speaker 1>animals do just pick up and repeat behaviors from one

0:53:53.160 --> 0:53:58.279
<v Speaker 1>another even though they don't provide an obvious continuing material benefit. Uh.

0:53:58.520 --> 0:54:00.960
<v Speaker 1>Of course we can imagine that the brain must be

0:54:01.040 --> 0:54:05.400
<v Speaker 1>supplying some kind of internal reward that motivates the pig's behavior.

0:54:05.640 --> 0:54:07.719
<v Speaker 1>But of course, you know, we know from our own

0:54:07.719 --> 0:54:11.160
<v Speaker 1>experience that we do behaviors all the time that don't

0:54:11.160 --> 0:54:15.120
<v Speaker 1>provide a clear evolutionary utilitarian benefit. They're just sort of

0:54:15.160 --> 0:54:18.920
<v Speaker 1>like a cultural artifact. There's something a behavior popped up,

0:54:18.960 --> 0:54:22.319
<v Speaker 1>it gets rewarded for some reason in our brains, even

0:54:22.320 --> 0:54:25.320
<v Speaker 1>though it's not helping us like live longer, be stronger,

0:54:25.440 --> 0:54:28.560
<v Speaker 1>or reproduce more well. And then via culture, there there

0:54:28.560 --> 0:54:31.880
<v Speaker 1>are various specific tools that we continue to use despite

0:54:31.880 --> 0:54:33.920
<v Speaker 1>the fact that there are much better ways to go

0:54:33.960 --> 0:54:36.520
<v Speaker 1>about a particular task. The main idea that the main

0:54:36.600 --> 0:54:39.960
<v Speaker 1>example comes to my mind is the wooden honey ladle

0:54:40.239 --> 0:54:43.520
<v Speaker 1>uh implement Um. We've talked about this on the show,

0:54:43.520 --> 0:54:47.080
<v Speaker 1>but about how it's just it's a messy, unnecessary thing

0:54:47.239 --> 0:54:50.040
<v Speaker 1>that looks cool. People like the way it looks. People

0:54:50.120 --> 0:54:52.279
<v Speaker 1>like the way it looks. But the honey bear, the

0:54:52.320 --> 0:54:56.200
<v Speaker 1>squeezable honey bear, is by far the superior means of

0:54:56.239 --> 0:54:59.560
<v Speaker 1>putting honey on anything or in anything. But what if

0:54:59.680 --> 0:55:02.719
<v Speaker 1>these pigs are using the sticks to dig for the

0:55:02.760 --> 0:55:06.040
<v Speaker 1>same reason that you might use the might use the

0:55:06.080 --> 0:55:08.840
<v Speaker 1>wooden honey spoon thing. I don't even know what you

0:55:08.880 --> 0:55:11.000
<v Speaker 1>call it. I think it has a name, and we're

0:55:11.120 --> 0:55:15.520
<v Speaker 1>forgetting it once more, the honey knob, honey, the ridged

0:55:15.560 --> 0:55:18.759
<v Speaker 1>honey knob, even though yeah, the squeeze bear that you

0:55:18.800 --> 0:55:22.719
<v Speaker 1>just squeeze with your own hands is more efficient. But yeah, Now,

0:55:22.760 --> 0:55:25.640
<v Speaker 1>another possibility that comes to mind here too is so

0:55:25.640 --> 0:55:29.120
<v Speaker 1>so we're looking to learn more about the wild implement

0:55:29.120 --> 0:55:33.520
<v Speaker 1>implementation of this tool use. So one question I would

0:55:33.520 --> 0:55:36.359
<v Speaker 1>have is, Okay, in the wild, are they using the

0:55:36.400 --> 0:55:39.960
<v Speaker 1>same pieces of wood, the same pieces of bark? Are

0:55:40.160 --> 0:55:43.120
<v Speaker 1>they comparable? Uh? And if they're not, that could be

0:55:43.600 --> 0:55:46.040
<v Speaker 1>an issue. Right, maybe they're using a different type of

0:55:46.040 --> 0:55:49.080
<v Speaker 1>wood in the wild the other that's true, Yeah, maybe

0:55:49.280 --> 0:55:53.000
<v Speaker 1>this is a behavior that they're trying to use tools

0:55:53.000 --> 0:55:55.359
<v Speaker 1>that are the inferior versions of the tool that would

0:55:55.400 --> 0:55:57.680
<v Speaker 1>be in their native range right or then also they're

0:55:57.719 --> 0:56:00.440
<v Speaker 1>threatened by habitat loss, so maybe they'd only even in

0:56:00.440 --> 0:56:03.320
<v Speaker 1>the wild, have the same access anymore, and they're making

0:56:03.360 --> 0:56:07.600
<v Speaker 1>do with inferior tools to carry out this, uh, this

0:56:07.760 --> 0:56:10.719
<v Speaker 1>practice that they've been doing for you know, for for

0:56:10.719 --> 0:56:14.120
<v Speaker 1>for so long. It's like after a nuclear apocalypse finding

0:56:14.200 --> 0:56:17.759
<v Speaker 1>humans making phone calls with tin cans and string. You know,

0:56:18.080 --> 0:56:20.200
<v Speaker 1>it's like, uh, why are they doing that? The tin

0:56:20.280 --> 0:56:22.600
<v Speaker 1>the tin cans and string don't work all that well.

0:56:22.640 --> 0:56:25.239
<v Speaker 1>But it's because they they're so used to doing the

0:56:25.280 --> 0:56:28.000
<v Speaker 1>regular phone calls and they don't have the right tools anymore.

0:56:28.239 --> 0:56:32.480
<v Speaker 1>Oh man, can you imagine a post apocalyptic world in

0:56:32.480 --> 0:56:36.280
<v Speaker 1>which there are no more smartphones, but but the people

0:56:36.360 --> 0:56:40.080
<v Speaker 1>still use like little chunks of stone or wood as

0:56:40.080 --> 0:56:44.400
<v Speaker 1>if they were smartphones that essentially like little idols, little

0:56:44.440 --> 0:56:48.040
<v Speaker 1>wooden gods that they speak to and listen to. Yes,

0:56:48.160 --> 0:56:51.759
<v Speaker 1>they carry around little rectangular flints that they stare at

0:56:51.800 --> 0:56:54.120
<v Speaker 1>while they're out in public, and then if they see

0:56:54.160 --> 0:56:56.320
<v Speaker 1>somebody they don't want to talk to, they can pretend

0:56:56.320 --> 0:56:58.480
<v Speaker 1>to be doing something on their flint and then so

0:56:58.520 --> 0:57:01.480
<v Speaker 1>they don't have to look up and make eye contact. Yeah,

0:57:01.520 --> 0:57:03.560
<v Speaker 1>well to bring it back to the gathering swine. I

0:57:03.560 --> 0:57:05.760
<v Speaker 1>mean it makes me think about how, in a way,

0:57:05.840 --> 0:57:09.680
<v Speaker 1>a lot of our our culturally learned behaviors are kind

0:57:09.680 --> 0:57:12.480
<v Speaker 1>of like a weird little demon possession, right there, a

0:57:12.640 --> 0:57:15.600
<v Speaker 1>thing that gets in our brain and exists for its

0:57:15.600 --> 0:57:18.240
<v Speaker 1>own sake, even though it doesn't necessarily help us in

0:57:18.320 --> 0:57:20.960
<v Speaker 1>any way, we just keep doing it. You know. It's

0:57:21.040 --> 0:57:25.440
<v Speaker 1>like it's the it's the self rewarding subroutine. Yeah, absolutely,

0:57:25.720 --> 0:57:27.000
<v Speaker 1>all right, So that you have it, I feel like

0:57:27.000 --> 0:57:29.959
<v Speaker 1>we covered a lot of ground in this episode. You know, Uh,

0:57:30.400 --> 0:57:33.280
<v Speaker 1>if you're playing the the Stuff to Blow your mind

0:57:33.320 --> 0:57:35.840
<v Speaker 1>drinking game, I guess you got to. You got to

0:57:35.840 --> 0:57:38.600
<v Speaker 1>take multiple shots here. We managed to fit a Bible

0:57:38.640 --> 0:57:41.440
<v Speaker 1>story in there. We had a skit with demons in it.

0:57:42.000 --> 0:57:46.320
<v Speaker 1>We got into tool use and animal intelligence, a little

0:57:46.320 --> 0:57:49.760
<v Speaker 1>bit of Chinese mythology incorporated as well. It's a lot

0:57:49.760 --> 0:57:53.040
<v Speaker 1>of my favorite stuff. Yeah, and and it's all ultimately

0:57:53.080 --> 0:57:56.600
<v Speaker 1>Halloween episode because at the heart we're still dealing with

0:57:56.640 --> 0:57:59.560
<v Speaker 1>the story of exorcism. So I'm looking up anagrams for

0:57:59.640 --> 0:58:03.240
<v Speaker 1>legion and like like Leno's in the Stephen King's story.

0:58:03.680 --> 0:58:05.960
<v Speaker 1>There are really not very many good ones. We got

0:58:06.040 --> 0:58:09.440
<v Speaker 1>leg I on Okay, let's not really good but but

0:58:09.600 --> 0:58:12.120
<v Speaker 1>still good. That just inserts the space. But we also

0:58:12.200 --> 0:58:16.320
<v Speaker 1>got ogl in sounds good ego Nil, Yeah, I like

0:58:16.400 --> 0:58:22.120
<v Speaker 1>that one, Lean Go line Go and old Jin Old Jen. Well,

0:58:22.520 --> 0:58:24.800
<v Speaker 1>those demons are gonna need a lot of names, because

0:58:24.800 --> 0:58:27.200
<v Speaker 1>there are a lot of them. I think we must

0:58:27.240 --> 0:58:29.280
<v Speaker 1>in there all right. Well, if you want to listen

0:58:29.320 --> 0:58:31.640
<v Speaker 1>to other episodes of Stuff to Blow your Mind, go

0:58:31.960 --> 0:58:34.880
<v Speaker 1>forth and do so. You'll find them wherever you get

0:58:34.920 --> 0:58:37.520
<v Speaker 1>your podcasts and wherever you get your podcast Just make

0:58:37.560 --> 0:58:40.440
<v Speaker 1>sure you rate and review, make sure you've subscribed. It's

0:58:40.440 --> 0:58:42.120
<v Speaker 1>a great way to support the show. You can also

0:58:42.120 --> 0:58:44.240
<v Speaker 1>get us find our episodes that Stuff with your Mind

0:58:44.280 --> 0:58:47.080
<v Speaker 1>dot com. Also, we have another show called Invention that

0:58:47.120 --> 0:58:50.240
<v Speaker 1>we uh we we highly recommend you check out this month.

0:58:50.360 --> 0:58:52.480
<v Speaker 1>We have a number of episodes that have come out

0:58:52.520 --> 0:58:58.200
<v Speaker 1>about caskets, casket science, casket history, weird casket inventions, well

0:58:58.360 --> 0:59:01.600
<v Speaker 1>worth listening to if you're in the mood for more

0:59:01.800 --> 0:59:05.160
<v Speaker 1>seasonal content. Yeah, if you're not subscribed to Invention, go

0:59:05.280 --> 0:59:09.120
<v Speaker 1>subscribe now. Ogl In Big Thanks as always to our

0:59:09.160 --> 0:59:12.400
<v Speaker 1>excellent audio producer Seth Nicholas Johnson. If you would like

0:59:12.440 --> 0:59:14.240
<v Speaker 1>to get in touch with us with feedback on this

0:59:14.320 --> 0:59:16.880
<v Speaker 1>episode or any other, to suggest topic for the future,

0:59:17.160 --> 0:59:19.360
<v Speaker 1>or just to say hello, come on and ogle on

0:59:19.520 --> 0:59:31.560
<v Speaker 1>in at contact at stuff to Blow your Mind dot com.

0:59:31.640 --> 0:59:33.480
<v Speaker 1>Stuff to Blow Your Mind is a production of iHeart

0:59:33.560 --> 0:59:35.919
<v Speaker 1>Radio's How Stuff Works. For more podcasts from my heart

0:59:35.960 --> 0:59:38.600
<v Speaker 1>Radio is at the iHeart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or

0:59:38.600 --> 0:59:49.240
<v Speaker 1>wherever you listen to your favorite shows.