WEBVTT - Peter Navarro Is Doubling Down on Tariffs

0:00:02.720 --> 0:00:07.200
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news.

0:00:08.400 --> 0:00:13.119
<v Speaker 2>I always trust in the president. He's playing three dimensional chess.

0:00:13.800 --> 0:00:16.160
<v Speaker 2>You can have points of view, you win some, you

0:00:16.280 --> 0:00:18.600
<v Speaker 2>lose some, but I always trust his judgment.

0:00:20.520 --> 0:00:25.320
<v Speaker 1>Peter Navarro, economist, White House trade advisor, and the man

0:00:25.400 --> 0:00:27.800
<v Speaker 1>who went to jail for President Trump.

0:00:28.080 --> 0:00:31.360
<v Speaker 2>Yes, indeed, this morning I did walk out of a

0:00:31.560 --> 0:00:32.639
<v Speaker 2>federal prisident.

0:00:33.440 --> 0:00:35.680
<v Speaker 1>Who would you trust to continue this agenda?

0:00:36.560 --> 0:00:40.040
<v Speaker 2>You got jd Vance's the vice president and Marco Rubio.

0:00:40.159 --> 0:00:42.839
<v Speaker 3>That would be the great ticket.

0:00:44.600 --> 0:00:49.920
<v Speaker 1>From Bloomberg Weekend. This is the Michelle Hussein Show. I'm

0:00:49.960 --> 0:00:56.800
<v Speaker 1>Michelle Hussein. It's been a dramatic start to the new

0:00:56.880 --> 0:01:01.320
<v Speaker 1>year for the Trump administration. First the season of Venezuela's leader,

0:01:01.440 --> 0:01:05.560
<v Speaker 1>Nicholas Maduro and saying the US will be running that

0:01:05.800 --> 0:01:10.039
<v Speaker 1>country at least for now, and then renewed talk of

0:01:10.240 --> 0:01:15.360
<v Speaker 1>acquiring Greenland, which is part of Denmark, a NATO ally.

0:01:15.560 --> 0:01:19.760
<v Speaker 1>Given Greenland's minerals and Venezuela's oil, all of this is

0:01:19.800 --> 0:01:24.920
<v Speaker 1>another demonstration of just how acutely aligned US trade policy

0:01:25.400 --> 0:01:29.319
<v Speaker 1>and foreign policy now are. But there's also a really

0:01:29.360 --> 0:01:32.960
<v Speaker 1>important aspect to the trade story that is bubbling at

0:01:32.959 --> 0:01:36.640
<v Speaker 1>home in the US, and it's part of this conversation

0:01:36.760 --> 0:01:40.680
<v Speaker 1>with Peter Navarro, the man who has probably influenced Donald

0:01:40.680 --> 0:01:44.319
<v Speaker 1>Trump on tariffs more than anyone else, a man who's

0:01:44.360 --> 0:01:48.680
<v Speaker 1>been at his side for years. Right now, the administration

0:01:48.800 --> 0:01:51.480
<v Speaker 1>is waiting for the Supreme Court to have it say

0:01:51.720 --> 0:01:55.600
<v Speaker 1>on the legal basis for last year's tariffs, and if

0:01:55.600 --> 0:02:00.680
<v Speaker 1>the White House loses, the implications are considerable. So keep

0:02:00.720 --> 0:02:03.800
<v Speaker 1>that in mind as you listen. Navara and I spoke

0:02:03.840 --> 0:02:08.040
<v Speaker 1>in Washington before the Venezuela developments, but the way he

0:02:08.120 --> 0:02:11.880
<v Speaker 1>sees the world is a crucial insight into how the

0:02:11.919 --> 0:02:18.400
<v Speaker 1>Trump circle thinks and why Dr Navara welcome, Thanks for

0:02:18.440 --> 0:02:19.000
<v Speaker 1>being with us.

0:02:19.120 --> 0:02:19.960
<v Speaker 3>Great to be with you.

0:02:20.080 --> 0:02:22.080
<v Speaker 1>I wondered if we could start with the origins of

0:02:22.120 --> 0:02:24.680
<v Speaker 1>your bond with the President. When did you meet him

0:02:24.720 --> 0:02:25.480
<v Speaker 1>for the first time.

0:02:26.040 --> 0:02:31.320
<v Speaker 2>It goes back to two thousand and six, when I

0:02:31.480 --> 0:02:36.240
<v Speaker 2>wrote the first book in what would be my China trilogy.

0:02:36.360 --> 0:02:40.160
<v Speaker 2>This is a book called The Coming China Wars, and

0:02:40.800 --> 0:02:46.240
<v Speaker 2>at the time it was widely viewed as hyperbole. Right

0:02:46.280 --> 0:02:50.840
<v Speaker 2>now it reads like a government report basically based on

0:02:50.919 --> 0:02:56.680
<v Speaker 2>my research. I had parsed the Chinese economic model, the

0:02:56.960 --> 0:03:01.959
<v Speaker 2>prevailing view in the early two thousand thousands, as China

0:03:02.000 --> 0:03:04.880
<v Speaker 2>had joined the World Trade Organization it was beginning to

0:03:04.919 --> 0:03:09.000
<v Speaker 2>inundate the world with their dump manufactured products.

0:03:09.120 --> 0:03:11.119
<v Speaker 3>Was that it was simply cheap labor.

0:03:11.680 --> 0:03:15.640
<v Speaker 2>And but my analysis showed that was a lot more

0:03:15.680 --> 0:03:18.600
<v Speaker 2>than that. Things I would eventually call the seven Deadly

0:03:18.800 --> 0:03:22.119
<v Speaker 2>Mercantile of sins, which is to say that China said

0:03:22.200 --> 0:03:28.120
<v Speaker 2>about taking the world apart using things like high government subsidies,

0:03:28.880 --> 0:03:36.280
<v Speaker 2>intellectual property, theft, unfasting, piracy, the whole state owned enterprise,

0:03:36.320 --> 0:03:39.520
<v Speaker 2>the whole gamut. So I had spent several years doing

0:03:39.600 --> 0:03:45.160
<v Speaker 2>research on that, published becoming China Wars. And then in

0:03:45.160 --> 0:03:51.000
<v Speaker 2>twenty eleven President Trump was doing an interview and they

0:03:51.040 --> 0:03:56.040
<v Speaker 2>asked him what his favorite books on China were, and

0:03:56.200 --> 0:04:00.480
<v Speaker 2>mine was on the top ten list. So I sent

0:04:00.600 --> 0:04:05.680
<v Speaker 2>him a note of thanks and we changed correspondences. There'll

0:04:05.680 --> 0:04:08.880
<v Speaker 2>be type letters, but he'll always put a handwritten note

0:04:08.920 --> 0:04:14.040
<v Speaker 2>in it. And that how that began. And when he

0:04:14.360 --> 0:04:18.760
<v Speaker 2>went down the escalator with Milania and declared, I sent

0:04:18.880 --> 0:04:22.320
<v Speaker 2>him a note, say, hey, you need anything, and they

0:04:22.360 --> 0:04:25.880
<v Speaker 2>called me. In twenty sixteen, I was supposed to go

0:04:25.920 --> 0:04:28.280
<v Speaker 2>out to New York just for a couple of days

0:04:28.880 --> 0:04:31.280
<v Speaker 2>and I meet him there.

0:04:31.600 --> 0:04:32.920
<v Speaker 3>It was pretty funny.

0:04:33.400 --> 0:04:37.520
<v Speaker 2>I get into this black suv in the back seat, right,

0:04:38.360 --> 0:04:41.280
<v Speaker 2>and we're getting ready to go to the airport and

0:04:41.520 --> 0:04:46.400
<v Speaker 2>get in his plane to go to a rally, famous rallies.

0:04:47.040 --> 0:04:50.279
<v Speaker 2>And he gets in the front seat and he's going, Hey, Rupert,

0:04:50.400 --> 0:04:53.800
<v Speaker 2>what's going on. It's like he's stalking to Murdoch. And

0:04:53.839 --> 0:04:56.240
<v Speaker 2>then he hangs up and he looks at back and

0:04:56.680 --> 0:05:00.480
<v Speaker 2>he goes, who's that because you never seen me before?

0:05:00.800 --> 0:05:04.040
<v Speaker 2>And I introduced myself and that's kind of how it happened.

0:05:04.080 --> 0:05:07.200
<v Speaker 1>So you bonded. You bonded over China, essentially your views

0:05:07.200 --> 0:05:10.880
<v Speaker 1>on China, and then China became a big rallying point

0:05:10.880 --> 0:05:13.400
<v Speaker 1>for him in his first in his first run for

0:05:13.440 --> 0:05:15.680
<v Speaker 1>the White House. I want to understand something about how

0:05:15.680 --> 0:05:18.920
<v Speaker 1>your views evolved because you used to be a Democrat, right,

0:05:18.960 --> 0:05:22.440
<v Speaker 1>You used to talk about how bad protectionism would be

0:05:22.680 --> 0:05:24.719
<v Speaker 1>not only for the US but the global economy.

0:05:25.040 --> 0:05:29.760
<v Speaker 2>Well, you're conflating a few things there, because historically Democrats

0:05:29.800 --> 0:05:34.360
<v Speaker 2>were the ones who were protectionists, who were in favor

0:05:34.760 --> 0:05:41.239
<v Speaker 2>of basically defending the American working class against unfair trade.

0:05:42.080 --> 0:05:46.800
<v Speaker 2>And we had in our history of this republic, a

0:05:46.920 --> 0:05:51.120
<v Speaker 2>very long history of defending our manufacturing base. If you

0:05:51.200 --> 0:05:56.640
<v Speaker 2>go back to Alexander Hamilton, first Treasury secretary, he wrote

0:05:57.120 --> 0:06:00.960
<v Speaker 2>a very stunning book about manufactur and the need to

0:06:01.000 --> 0:06:05.320
<v Speaker 2>protect it. Lincoln was a tariff man. McKinley was a

0:06:05.360 --> 0:06:09.120
<v Speaker 2>tariff man. Henry Clay was a tariff man. I mean,

0:06:09.200 --> 0:06:13.320
<v Speaker 2>all of these famous figures, and up until nineteen thirteen,

0:06:13.600 --> 0:06:18.440
<v Speaker 2>the United States actually funded its government entirely through tariff revenues,

0:06:18.760 --> 0:06:21.200
<v Speaker 2>if you knew that. And then we had passed the

0:06:21.240 --> 0:06:24.640
<v Speaker 2>income tax and kind of shifted away from that. And

0:06:24.720 --> 0:06:27.599
<v Speaker 2>one of the running jokes the bosson I have is like,

0:06:27.760 --> 0:06:31.360
<v Speaker 2>who figured the China thing out first? And of course

0:06:31.400 --> 0:06:35.279
<v Speaker 2>he did, because if you go back, there's a famous

0:06:35.320 --> 0:06:38.920
<v Speaker 2>interview with him in Oprah Winfrey back in the eighties,

0:06:39.560 --> 0:06:41.480
<v Speaker 2>and he wasn't talking about China, but he was talking

0:06:41.480 --> 0:06:44.279
<v Speaker 2>about Japan and how they were taking us apart with

0:06:44.400 --> 0:06:48.520
<v Speaker 2>unfair trade, and everything he said back then would then

0:06:48.680 --> 0:06:52.359
<v Speaker 2>fit the China model. Now, with respect to my evolution

0:06:52.480 --> 0:06:57.279
<v Speaker 2>of thought, my first exposure to kind of the Chinese

0:06:57.360 --> 0:07:00.000
<v Speaker 2>economic model was when I was in a peace corps

0:07:00.480 --> 0:07:05.400
<v Speaker 2>in Thailand, and what was fascinating to me is that

0:07:05.839 --> 0:07:10.520
<v Speaker 2>virtually everywhere you went in Asia, the commerce was run

0:07:10.560 --> 0:07:12.360
<v Speaker 2>by Chinese.

0:07:12.600 --> 0:07:16.280
<v Speaker 1>Even then it's before time, before Gint's joined the Double Well, this.

0:07:16.320 --> 0:07:21.320
<v Speaker 2>Was the Chinese diaspora who had left because of miles,

0:07:21.320 --> 0:07:26.640
<v Speaker 2>starvation and famine policies. So you fast forward to I'm

0:07:26.680 --> 0:07:30.240
<v Speaker 2>teaching at the University of California Ravion business students who

0:07:30.240 --> 0:07:32.440
<v Speaker 2>are fully employed. Right they come at night and on

0:07:32.480 --> 0:07:34.880
<v Speaker 2>the weekends, and I'm noticing they're losing their jobs.

0:07:35.480 --> 0:07:37.000
<v Speaker 3>I'm thinking, what's going on here?

0:07:37.040 --> 0:07:41.720
<v Speaker 2>And this was circa two thousand and three, and curiously

0:07:41.760 --> 0:07:44.800
<v Speaker 2>two years after China joined the World Trade Organization. So

0:07:45.080 --> 0:07:47.320
<v Speaker 2>I looked into this and it's like all roads led

0:07:47.360 --> 0:07:51.840
<v Speaker 2>to Beijing. I do the research project and I realized, hey,

0:07:51.920 --> 0:07:58.200
<v Speaker 2>this this is cheating. It's devastating our manufacturing base, and

0:07:58.880 --> 0:08:01.360
<v Speaker 2>I would continue that research.

0:08:01.720 --> 0:08:03.800
<v Speaker 1>So bring us up to the present day. Then, because

0:08:03.800 --> 0:08:06.280
<v Speaker 1>you were at President Trumps side in the first term,

0:08:06.680 --> 0:08:08.200
<v Speaker 1>you went to jail for him.

0:08:08.600 --> 0:08:11.600
<v Speaker 2>So to be clear, I went to prison in defense

0:08:11.680 --> 0:08:16.880
<v Speaker 2>of the constitution, the constitutional separation of powers. Basically, what

0:08:17.280 --> 0:08:21.840
<v Speaker 2>Congress did in the wake of the January sixth riots

0:08:21.840 --> 0:08:27.600
<v Speaker 2>on Capitol Hill was engaging a partisan effort to unseat

0:08:27.680 --> 0:08:30.320
<v Speaker 2>the president and make sure he never ran for office again.

0:08:30.600 --> 0:08:32.880
<v Speaker 1>I wonder how much it changed you, because I'm struck

0:08:32.920 --> 0:08:35.760
<v Speaker 1>reading your account of your prison days. How much you

0:08:35.880 --> 0:08:40.559
<v Speaker 1>notice and document all the small pettiness, really, the meanness

0:08:41.080 --> 0:08:43.880
<v Speaker 1>that you see around you, the withholding of medicines, the

0:08:44.840 --> 0:08:47.920
<v Speaker 1>lack of fresh fruit and vegetables. Did you see a

0:08:48.080 --> 0:08:51.720
<v Speaker 1>different America which has informed your politics?

0:08:51.880 --> 0:08:52.320
<v Speaker 3>Now?

0:08:52.600 --> 0:08:55.360
<v Speaker 2>I grew up poor, I grew up in that miliu.

0:08:55.840 --> 0:08:58.880
<v Speaker 2>It just in prison didn't change me at all. I

0:08:58.960 --> 0:09:02.439
<v Speaker 2>changed prison. I changed that place. I changed the system.

0:09:02.800 --> 0:09:08.359
<v Speaker 2>I went in there to defend the Constitution on principle,

0:09:08.960 --> 0:09:14.000
<v Speaker 2>and instead of crying in my beer, I turned myself

0:09:14.000 --> 0:09:18.120
<v Speaker 2>into an investigative reporter and covered a five billion dollar scandal.

0:09:18.720 --> 0:09:22.240
<v Speaker 2>And since I've been out, I've solved that scandal and

0:09:21.920 --> 0:09:23.520
<v Speaker 2>that's a pretty good achievement.

0:09:23.600 --> 0:09:26.240
<v Speaker 3>So presently changed me? I changed it.

0:09:26.520 --> 0:09:30.840
<v Speaker 1>And now you've been his trade counselor and advisor through

0:09:30.880 --> 0:09:33.840
<v Speaker 1>this period. How's the relationship between the US and China

0:09:33.880 --> 0:09:34.680
<v Speaker 1>on trade going?

0:09:34.760 --> 0:09:34.960
<v Speaker 3>Now?

0:09:35.040 --> 0:09:36.199
<v Speaker 1>Help us understand it.

0:09:36.640 --> 0:09:41.200
<v Speaker 2>Look, it's a work in progress, the relationship with China.

0:09:41.320 --> 0:09:44.480
<v Speaker 2>I am a veteran of the first term. I spent

0:09:45.360 --> 0:09:48.800
<v Speaker 2>months and months and months with then the United States

0:09:48.880 --> 0:09:54.040
<v Speaker 2>Trade Representative Robert Leitthheiser, one of the great American patriots

0:09:54.080 --> 0:10:00.240
<v Speaker 2>and thinkers in this country, and we negotiated with the

0:10:00.360 --> 0:10:05.040
<v Speaker 2>Chinese a very very comprehensive trade deal. It was an

0:10:05.120 --> 0:10:08.520
<v Speaker 2>amazing thing that would have been really good for China

0:10:08.600 --> 0:10:11.880
<v Speaker 2>as well as the United States because it would have

0:10:11.920 --> 0:10:18.480
<v Speaker 2>completely reform Chinese model, and they agreed to it, and

0:10:18.520 --> 0:10:23.880
<v Speaker 2>then at the last minute, Chi Jinping said no, okay.

0:10:24.000 --> 0:10:26.600
<v Speaker 3>So that was that's like really important to understand.

0:10:27.000 --> 0:10:30.560
<v Speaker 2>We went for a long over a year negotiating what

0:10:30.600 --> 0:10:33.040
<v Speaker 2>would have been a perfect deal, and then at the

0:10:33.120 --> 0:10:35.280
<v Speaker 2>end they backed out of that. And then we signed

0:10:35.280 --> 0:10:39.080
<v Speaker 2>what was called the Skinny Deal, and that was in

0:10:39.240 --> 0:10:42.520
<v Speaker 2>January of twenty twenty, the last year the Trump administration,

0:10:42.960 --> 0:10:43.360
<v Speaker 2>and they.

0:10:43.280 --> 0:10:45.640
<v Speaker 3>Didn't abide by that.

0:10:45.960 --> 0:10:49.920
<v Speaker 2>So the problem that we always faced with China is

0:10:49.960 --> 0:10:54.439
<v Speaker 2>that you always kind of wonder whether they're just stretching

0:10:54.520 --> 0:10:57.760
<v Speaker 2>you out, whether even if you sign a deal, they're

0:10:57.800 --> 0:10:58.680
<v Speaker 2>going to retrade it.

0:10:59.040 --> 0:11:02.200
<v Speaker 1>And the US administration, which is why I want to

0:11:02.240 --> 0:11:07.560
<v Speaker 1>understand what the actions currently are. For example, President Trump

0:11:07.720 --> 0:11:11.360
<v Speaker 1>meets Siegen Ping and Essentially, you end up with a

0:11:11.440 --> 0:11:15.960
<v Speaker 1>deal which lowers some tariffs and which suspends heightened tariffs.

0:11:15.960 --> 0:11:19.920
<v Speaker 1>So there's effectively a year long trade truce. Is that

0:11:20.080 --> 0:11:23.120
<v Speaker 1>keeping with your mission to avoid death by China?

0:11:23.679 --> 0:11:27.480
<v Speaker 2>So you're burying the lead here. What's the current tariff

0:11:27.559 --> 0:11:28.040
<v Speaker 2>rate now?

0:11:28.440 --> 0:11:32.360
<v Speaker 1>Well, the ones I'm referring to are the lowering.

0:11:31.920 --> 0:11:34.360
<v Speaker 3>Of some of the Well, what's the current rate after

0:11:34.400 --> 0:11:35.160
<v Speaker 3>they've been lowered.

0:11:35.400 --> 0:11:37.000
<v Speaker 1>Well, it's ten percent on some things.

0:11:37.080 --> 0:11:42.800
<v Speaker 2>Right now, totally, total tariff on China is almost fifty percent. Okay,

0:11:42.880 --> 0:11:45.560
<v Speaker 2>let me say it one more time. It's almost fifty percent.

0:11:45.640 --> 0:11:48.880
<v Speaker 2>So when you say that we lowered the rates, we

0:11:48.920 --> 0:11:54.280
<v Speaker 2>only lowered them down to fortyk.

0:11:54.040 --> 0:11:59.520
<v Speaker 1>Imposed to fentanyl flows, and there was a suspension ciprocal tariffs.

0:11:59.120 --> 0:12:02.480
<v Speaker 2>You have to understand there was a baseline tariff because

0:12:02.520 --> 0:12:06.240
<v Speaker 2>of the Section three oh one actions in the first term.

0:12:06.480 --> 0:12:09.960
<v Speaker 2>One of the few things Joe Biden kept that we

0:12:10.040 --> 0:12:13.400
<v Speaker 2>added the reciprocal tariff to which is still in place,

0:12:13.880 --> 0:12:16.800
<v Speaker 2>and a twenty percent fentanyl tariff, which we only lowered

0:12:16.800 --> 0:12:21.320
<v Speaker 2>by ten percent. So those are robust tariffs on China,

0:12:21.360 --> 0:12:26.480
<v Speaker 2>and in fact, we are strongly encouraging Europe to adopt

0:12:26.559 --> 0:12:30.520
<v Speaker 2>exactly the same level of tariffs that we adopt for

0:12:30.600 --> 0:12:36.360
<v Speaker 2>the simple reason that when the President puts up tariffs

0:12:36.400 --> 0:12:41.200
<v Speaker 2>to defend America from Chinese cheating, China can't sell as

0:12:41.280 --> 0:12:45.000
<v Speaker 2>much here where does it sell it? Dumps it in Europe,

0:12:45.200 --> 0:12:48.360
<v Speaker 2>dumps it in Mexico. Now as we are talking, just

0:12:48.600 --> 0:12:53.160
<v Speaker 2>in the recent news, Mexico did exactly what I'm suggesting,

0:12:53.240 --> 0:12:56.000
<v Speaker 2>did so at the urging of our trade team, which

0:12:56.040 --> 0:13:00.440
<v Speaker 2>is to say, the Senate in Mexico passed fifty cars

0:13:00.880 --> 0:13:04.240
<v Speaker 2>on China. And they did it because China was dumping

0:13:04.480 --> 0:13:08.920
<v Speaker 2>goods which would otherwise go in America. And Europe should.

0:13:08.600 --> 0:13:12.200
<v Speaker 3>Follow the US and Mexican lead, and there are doing that.

0:13:12.240 --> 0:13:15.440
<v Speaker 1>They're doing that and steel, and I seeing that in

0:13:15.480 --> 0:13:18.600
<v Speaker 1>other countries. But I'm sure that you can see why.

0:13:19.120 --> 0:13:23.560
<v Speaker 1>Looking at the US China relationship, one can see the

0:13:23.600 --> 0:13:26.800
<v Speaker 1>contrast between when President Trump first arrived and we end

0:13:26.880 --> 0:13:29.800
<v Speaker 1>up with a meeting after which he talks about having

0:13:30.000 --> 0:13:33.040
<v Speaker 1>enormous respect between the two countries and how honored he

0:13:33.200 --> 0:13:37.640
<v Speaker 1>is that presidency has has authorized the purchase of soybeans

0:13:37.880 --> 0:13:40.800
<v Speaker 1>and other goods. So there is a softening.

0:13:40.559 --> 0:13:46.400
<v Speaker 2>No, there's no softening, understand trump diplomacy works. And the

0:13:46.440 --> 0:13:50.600
<v Speaker 2>great thing that people, particularly on the left oone understand

0:13:51.320 --> 0:13:55.840
<v Speaker 2>is that it's functional for President Trump to have open

0:13:55.920 --> 0:14:01.640
<v Speaker 2>lines with Shijin Ping, Vladimir Putin, to wand in Turkey,

0:14:02.559 --> 0:14:08.040
<v Speaker 2>all of the people that the world regards as vicious dictators,

0:14:08.280 --> 0:14:11.400
<v Speaker 2>which they are, but they are part of the world

0:14:11.440 --> 0:14:15.079
<v Speaker 2>stage where you have to negotiate.

0:14:15.280 --> 0:14:20.200
<v Speaker 1>So we have them saying enormous respect for China. That's

0:14:20.200 --> 0:14:22.720
<v Speaker 1>what he's talking about. Do you have enormous respect?

0:14:23.000 --> 0:14:25.520
<v Speaker 3>I have enormous respect for the Chinese people.

0:14:25.960 --> 0:14:29.280
<v Speaker 2>Okay, the Chinese people are under the boot of Chinese

0:14:29.280 --> 0:14:33.720
<v Speaker 2>Communist Party. If China is going to escape its own

0:14:34.280 --> 0:14:39.880
<v Speaker 2>mercantilist economic model, which is screwing the world, including Europe,

0:14:40.320 --> 0:14:44.560
<v Speaker 2>and causing tremendous instability in the financial system and great

0:14:44.920 --> 0:14:48.640
<v Speaker 2>anger towards China, it needs to do one simple thing.

0:14:49.040 --> 0:14:53.360
<v Speaker 2>It needs to lower the savings rate in China by

0:14:53.440 --> 0:14:56.360
<v Speaker 2>providing a social safety net for his people.

0:14:56.440 --> 0:14:58.200
<v Speaker 3>It's extraordinary that.

0:14:58.240 --> 0:15:05.480
<v Speaker 2>A communist social list country has no protections with respect

0:15:05.480 --> 0:15:08.600
<v Speaker 2>to pensions or healthcare for its people.

0:15:09.160 --> 0:15:10.840
<v Speaker 3>That's extraordinary.

0:15:11.360 --> 0:15:15.200
<v Speaker 2>And instead, what the Chinese do, because that's the way

0:15:15.240 --> 0:15:20.280
<v Speaker 2>they roll, is they let the Communist Party members become rich,

0:15:20.840 --> 0:15:26.880
<v Speaker 2>they let a smaller slice of the entrepreneurial class become rich,

0:15:27.440 --> 0:15:30.160
<v Speaker 2>and then everybody else is allowed by Jings.

0:15:30.360 --> 0:15:32.320
<v Speaker 1>I know how strongly you feel about this. You've written

0:15:32.360 --> 0:15:35.680
<v Speaker 1>about it in successive books. I wonder if there are

0:15:35.680 --> 0:15:39.560
<v Speaker 1>other people who would prioritize doing business with China who

0:15:39.640 --> 0:15:44.160
<v Speaker 1>have influence over the president in a way that makes

0:15:44.200 --> 0:15:48.120
<v Speaker 1>you less than comfortable. Jensen Nibs managed to get Nvidia

0:15:48.360 --> 0:15:51.920
<v Speaker 1>H two hundred chips being sold to China. Are you

0:15:52.000 --> 0:15:53.720
<v Speaker 1>comfortable with that.

0:15:53.320 --> 0:15:56.920
<v Speaker 2>That's a work in progress, that's an ongoing dialogue. I

0:15:56.960 --> 0:16:01.720
<v Speaker 2>think people have to understand that there's a constant negotiation

0:16:02.080 --> 0:16:05.440
<v Speaker 2>going on with countries around the world. I mean, and

0:16:05.760 --> 0:16:09.960
<v Speaker 2>the China relationship is a very difficult one. I think

0:16:10.000 --> 0:16:14.640
<v Speaker 2>you left out the part about how China has weaponized

0:16:15.440 --> 0:16:19.440
<v Speaker 2>rare earth critical minerals, which you're a critical part of

0:16:19.600 --> 0:16:24.320
<v Speaker 2>virtually every high technology product that's made around the world.

0:16:24.960 --> 0:16:30.320
<v Speaker 2>And China has been flexing its muscles now in Europe

0:16:30.400 --> 0:16:34.240
<v Speaker 2>and India and the United States saying basically, we're going

0:16:34.320 --> 0:16:37.080
<v Speaker 2>to do what we want and if you try to

0:16:37.120 --> 0:16:41.440
<v Speaker 2>stop us, we're going to take away your critical minerals

0:16:41.920 --> 0:16:45.000
<v Speaker 2>because they have they think they have a monopoly on it.

0:16:45.040 --> 0:16:47.280
<v Speaker 3>But that's just a matter of time.

0:16:47.360 --> 0:16:52.480
<v Speaker 2>American innovation is going to quickly wipe away that weaponization.

0:16:52.960 --> 0:16:54.560
<v Speaker 3>So what do you do in the meantime?

0:16:55.240 --> 0:16:59.120
<v Speaker 2>You do diplomacy And if people want to call that soft,

0:16:59.640 --> 0:17:01.440
<v Speaker 2>then they don't understand the chessboard.

0:17:01.560 --> 0:17:03.960
<v Speaker 1>So are you comfortable with China being able to buy

0:17:04.000 --> 0:17:08.919
<v Speaker 1>in the videos the specific game? But the next generation AI.

0:17:08.920 --> 0:17:10.439
<v Speaker 3>Ships not my wane? Okay?

0:17:10.480 --> 0:17:13.679
<v Speaker 1>I accept it enables a lot of competition then with

0:17:14.359 --> 0:17:15.439
<v Speaker 1>USAI companies.

0:17:15.520 --> 0:17:19.200
<v Speaker 3>Let me let your viewers know this. I'm one of only.

0:17:19.080 --> 0:17:24.800
<v Speaker 2>Three people who served as a senior advisor in the

0:17:24.840 --> 0:17:28.480
<v Speaker 2>first Trump administration from the beginning to the end. That

0:17:28.760 --> 0:17:32.159
<v Speaker 2>happened because I stay in my lane and ships are

0:17:32.200 --> 0:17:32.720
<v Speaker 2>not my waye.

0:17:49.520 --> 0:17:52.640
<v Speaker 1>I know from one of your books, taking Back Trump's America,

0:17:52.720 --> 0:17:55.960
<v Speaker 1>that you know exactly what it's like to be part

0:17:56.000 --> 0:17:59.160
<v Speaker 1>of an administration where different people have influence, and how

0:17:59.200 --> 0:18:02.760
<v Speaker 1>you worry about losing sight of a core agenda. You

0:18:02.840 --> 0:18:06.639
<v Speaker 1>write essentially that people need to remember about delivering for

0:18:06.720 --> 0:18:12.119
<v Speaker 1>working class Americans. So are there risks to the American

0:18:12.440 --> 0:18:15.720
<v Speaker 1>people not understanding the agenda that you're trying to deliver

0:18:15.800 --> 0:18:18.719
<v Speaker 1>now that we're in the run up to the midterms.

0:18:18.400 --> 0:18:22.080
<v Speaker 2>Of course, and part of my job is to explain

0:18:22.400 --> 0:18:28.320
<v Speaker 2>exactly what we've inherited, which is a mess, how we're

0:18:28.480 --> 0:18:32.919
<v Speaker 2>addressing it, and how long it's going to take to

0:18:33.000 --> 0:18:36.359
<v Speaker 2>see the fruits of the Trump policies.

0:18:36.400 --> 0:18:38.280
<v Speaker 3>The model here, how long do you think it's going

0:18:38.320 --> 0:18:38.919
<v Speaker 3>to do well?

0:18:39.160 --> 0:18:44.159
<v Speaker 2>The model here is the transition from Jimmy Carter in

0:18:44.200 --> 0:18:50.160
<v Speaker 2>the seventies era of stagflation to the presidency of Ronald Reagan. Carter,

0:18:51.040 --> 0:18:58.840
<v Speaker 2>much like Biden Harris, created a tremendous problem with both

0:18:58.880 --> 0:19:01.720
<v Speaker 2>inflation and recession because of their policies. If you think

0:19:01.720 --> 0:19:05.879
<v Speaker 2>about what Biden set us up for, it was a

0:19:05.920 --> 0:19:09.800
<v Speaker 2>stagflationary scenario. So Carter did the same for Reagan. So

0:19:09.880 --> 0:19:14.480
<v Speaker 2>Reagan comes in, does their deregulation, positive supply shock, does

0:19:14.520 --> 0:19:19.359
<v Speaker 2>the tax cuts, positive supply shock, makes adjustments, stops doing

0:19:19.400 --> 0:19:23.760
<v Speaker 2>stupid stuff like Carter did. But it takes time, and

0:19:23.880 --> 0:19:27.600
<v Speaker 2>for Reagan the time ran out because by the time

0:19:27.760 --> 0:19:31.640
<v Speaker 2>the midterms rolled around two years after he assumed office,

0:19:32.240 --> 0:19:36.879
<v Speaker 2>it was a bloodbath and the Democrats won the House

0:19:37.400 --> 0:19:41.800
<v Speaker 2>and basically paralyzed government. But the next six years were

0:19:41.800 --> 0:19:45.800
<v Speaker 2>a beautiful thing because Reagan's policies took hold and we

0:19:45.920 --> 0:19:46.439
<v Speaker 2>had one of the.

0:19:46.440 --> 0:19:47.520
<v Speaker 3>Most prosperous times.

0:19:47.560 --> 0:19:51.080
<v Speaker 2>Now we understand that history, and we're trying to make

0:19:51.119 --> 0:19:54.480
<v Speaker 2>sure we don't get caught in that same vice. So

0:19:54.600 --> 0:19:57.639
<v Speaker 2>what we have to do is explain very clearly to

0:19:57.640 --> 0:19:58.399
<v Speaker 2>American people.

0:19:58.600 --> 0:19:59.880
<v Speaker 3>Let me give you a two exam.

0:20:00.119 --> 0:20:01.840
<v Speaker 1>Wait, I do want to ask you this this point

0:20:01.840 --> 0:20:04.240
<v Speaker 1>about the timeframe, so work in progress. You need to

0:20:04.280 --> 0:20:08.440
<v Speaker 1>convince Americans and work hard on that. Twenty twenty eight

0:20:08.480 --> 0:20:11.800
<v Speaker 1>in that election, who would you trust to continue this agenda.

0:20:13.200 --> 0:20:15.440
<v Speaker 3>It's not for me to say, and that's not that's

0:20:15.520 --> 0:20:17.520
<v Speaker 3>not my job. You got JD.

0:20:17.680 --> 0:20:20.800
<v Speaker 2>Vance's the vice president and Marco Rubio. That would be,

0:20:21.119 --> 0:20:22.760
<v Speaker 2>for example, a great ticket.

0:20:22.640 --> 0:20:24.040
<v Speaker 1>With who at the top of the ticket.

0:20:24.680 --> 0:20:28.240
<v Speaker 2>JD would be there, But Marco's already said that if JD.

0:20:28.119 --> 0:20:31.679
<v Speaker 3>Runs, he would wouldn't challenge you. I love these guys,

0:20:31.880 --> 0:20:32.399
<v Speaker 3>these are.

0:20:34.040 --> 0:20:37.720
<v Speaker 2>I always admired Marco back in twenty sixteen. I always

0:20:37.720 --> 0:20:40.400
<v Speaker 2>thought he was like of the people on that stage,

0:20:40.400 --> 0:20:43.680
<v Speaker 2>the sixteen Republicans. I always thought he was the sharpest

0:20:43.680 --> 0:20:46.919
<v Speaker 2>tool in the shed besides Donald Trump. Right, he couldn't

0:20:46.920 --> 0:20:50.840
<v Speaker 2>hold a candle to Trump with respect to everything. But

0:20:51.280 --> 0:20:55.679
<v Speaker 2>he's he's he's really a very capable person. But I

0:20:55.720 --> 0:20:59.119
<v Speaker 2>think you're on some here with the messaging because people

0:20:59.680 --> 0:21:02.480
<v Speaker 2>on your side of the Atlantic are You're going to

0:21:02.560 --> 0:21:06.080
<v Speaker 2>be watching that election for Congress very carefully because what

0:21:06.280 --> 0:21:10.040
<v Speaker 2>happened in twenty eighteen because we lost the House. I

0:21:10.080 --> 0:21:12.280
<v Speaker 2>write about that in my book. There were some mistakes

0:21:12.280 --> 0:21:15.600
<v Speaker 2>made that I hope we don't make again. It became,

0:21:18.200 --> 0:21:20.320
<v Speaker 2>let's say, a crap show. That's a little easier way

0:21:20.320 --> 0:21:24.800
<v Speaker 2>of saying it, because the Democrats just started issuing subpoenas

0:21:24.840 --> 0:21:26.479
<v Speaker 2>and impeachments and all that.

0:21:26.520 --> 0:21:29.440
<v Speaker 3>But we don't want to repeat that. But here's what

0:21:29.560 --> 0:21:30.240
<v Speaker 3>we're up against.

0:21:30.480 --> 0:21:34.640
<v Speaker 2>It's like, we come in and we got egg prices

0:21:34.800 --> 0:21:38.639
<v Speaker 2>off the charts, and we got beef prices off the charts.

0:21:38.760 --> 0:21:40.639
<v Speaker 3>Okay, it's like that's terrible.

0:21:40.680 --> 0:21:44.119
<v Speaker 2>It's like it's as American as you can't scramble eggs

0:21:44.119 --> 0:21:47.919
<v Speaker 2>and hamburgers, right, So with eggs, we've been able to

0:21:48.080 --> 0:21:52.360
<v Speaker 2>dramatically reduce the price of eggs almost immediately. How did

0:21:52.400 --> 0:21:56.240
<v Speaker 2>we get there? This is really interesting how politics works here.

0:21:56.680 --> 0:22:01.280
<v Speaker 2>It's like the Democrats come in and the chickens. They

0:22:01.359 --> 0:22:05.800
<v Speaker 2>kill eighty million chickens. Literally, Joe Biden slaughters eighty million

0:22:05.880 --> 0:22:09.000
<v Speaker 2>chickens because he overreacts to an avian flu thing. At

0:22:09.040 --> 0:22:14.600
<v Speaker 2>the same time, with beef, he reduces grazing land because

0:22:14.680 --> 0:22:16.960
<v Speaker 2>they're like, they want to eat soy birders.

0:22:17.720 --> 0:22:20.560
<v Speaker 1>And questions about your policy, aren't they? You mentioned beef,

0:22:20.600 --> 0:22:23.520
<v Speaker 1>And I'm conscious of the fact that President Trump reduced

0:22:24.080 --> 0:22:28.719
<v Speaker 1>tariffs on beef, tomatoes, coffee, and bananas exactly because of

0:22:28.760 --> 0:22:32.919
<v Speaker 1>the pressures on the household budgets of ordinary Americans. So

0:22:33.240 --> 0:22:35.840
<v Speaker 1>that's an acknowledgment, isn't it that some of the actions

0:22:35.840 --> 0:22:39.359
<v Speaker 1>the administration has taken, including on tariffs of which you

0:22:39.440 --> 0:22:43.000
<v Speaker 1>are the architect, they have played a role in hurting

0:22:43.320 --> 0:22:44.360
<v Speaker 1>ordinary Americans.

0:22:44.440 --> 0:22:49.800
<v Speaker 2>I'm totally supportive of no tariffs on products we don't

0:22:49.840 --> 0:22:53.960
<v Speaker 2>make here. We don't make coffee here, so it made

0:22:54.040 --> 0:22:58.760
<v Speaker 2>no sense. It happened, and now we make adjustments. That's

0:22:58.760 --> 0:23:01.920
<v Speaker 2>what we do. We may adjustments, but if you look

0:23:01.960 --> 0:23:06.040
<v Speaker 2>at the economics of that or elasticities of supplying the man,

0:23:06.160 --> 0:23:09.160
<v Speaker 2>it's like, we don't make coffee, right, so we don't

0:23:09.200 --> 0:23:12.919
<v Speaker 2>make chocolate, so we lower the price on that. In

0:23:13.000 --> 0:23:16.320
<v Speaker 2>the short run, we can we can import a little

0:23:16.480 --> 0:23:20.959
<v Speaker 2>little beef. But we just had oil drop below sixty

0:23:21.000 --> 0:23:24.439
<v Speaker 2>dollars a barrel, which is where it was when we

0:23:24.560 --> 0:23:29.280
<v Speaker 2>left office the first term for Trump. Okay, Biden jacked

0:23:29.280 --> 0:23:34.359
<v Speaker 2>that price up is about seventy five dollars. And so

0:23:34.480 --> 0:23:37.919
<v Speaker 2>what that does is not only increases the cost of

0:23:37.960 --> 0:23:41.520
<v Speaker 2>heating your home and driving your car. It increases the

0:23:41.560 --> 0:23:46.159
<v Speaker 2>cost of fertilizer for crops, so food prices go up.

0:23:46.200 --> 0:23:49.359
<v Speaker 2>It increases the cost of transportation for more.

0:23:49.520 --> 0:23:53.159
<v Speaker 1>Manufacturing jobs have declined for seven straight months.

0:23:53.240 --> 0:23:57.400
<v Speaker 3>Let's shift to that. Let's think about that. Okay, that's

0:23:57.520 --> 0:24:00.359
<v Speaker 3>my job. I'm the senior counselor for trade man. Actually,

0:24:00.840 --> 0:24:04.000
<v Speaker 3>how long do you think it's me? I can tell you.

0:24:04.280 --> 0:24:07.800
<v Speaker 3>I can tell you that with exactitude. Okay, here's how

0:24:07.840 --> 0:24:08.399
<v Speaker 3>it works.

0:24:08.600 --> 0:24:10.159
<v Speaker 1>No, how long is it going to take for you

0:24:10.200 --> 0:24:10.639
<v Speaker 1>to be well?

0:24:10.680 --> 0:24:12.879
<v Speaker 2>Let me let me just work you through the quick math.

0:24:13.119 --> 0:24:17.720
<v Speaker 2>For you to have a new factory in this country

0:24:18.560 --> 0:24:22.320
<v Speaker 2>ready to produce things and therefore have new manufacturing jobs,

0:24:22.760 --> 0:24:25.760
<v Speaker 2>that's about two to three years.

0:24:26.440 --> 0:24:26.760
<v Speaker 3>Now.

0:24:27.000 --> 0:24:29.600
<v Speaker 2>What you see in the interim is this, We're having

0:24:29.760 --> 0:24:34.840
<v Speaker 2>literally trillions of dollars of investment come in from abroad

0:24:35.000 --> 0:24:40.240
<v Speaker 2>as well as domestically, which is, as we speak, beginning

0:24:40.760 --> 0:24:44.280
<v Speaker 2>to design those factories and get ready to build them.

0:24:44.320 --> 0:24:48.199
<v Speaker 2>Now what happens then you have a boom in construction jobs.

0:24:48.280 --> 0:24:51.000
<v Speaker 2>That's the first phase of that. But you won't see

0:24:51.000 --> 0:24:54.439
<v Speaker 2>any improvement in manufacturing right then. But then once you

0:24:54.640 --> 0:24:58.920
<v Speaker 2>build the factories, that's when you see the manufacturing jobs.

0:24:59.119 --> 0:25:02.479
<v Speaker 2>So home wasn't built in the day China took us

0:25:02.640 --> 0:25:06.600
<v Speaker 2>to It's going on twenty five years now. Where they've

0:25:06.640 --> 0:25:10.359
<v Speaker 2>taken us apart. It's not just the factories they took.

0:25:10.400 --> 0:25:13.960
<v Speaker 2>They took our supply chains. And we can't like wave

0:25:14.000 --> 0:25:15.840
<v Speaker 2>a magic wine, doesn't work like that.

0:25:16.480 --> 0:25:18.080
<v Speaker 3>But if you simply.

0:25:17.720 --> 0:25:21.200
<v Speaker 2>Look at the trajectory, it's going to be a beautiful thing.

0:25:21.480 --> 0:25:24.840
<v Speaker 1>Do you think it's going to be enough of a

0:25:24.960 --> 0:25:28.119
<v Speaker 1>message to be saying to Americans in the run up

0:25:28.119 --> 0:25:30.719
<v Speaker 1>to the midterm it's a work in progress. The Democrats

0:25:30.960 --> 0:25:33.240
<v Speaker 1>left us a really bad inheritance. Don't you think you

0:25:33.320 --> 0:25:35.040
<v Speaker 1>might have to do more?

0:25:35.200 --> 0:25:37.359
<v Speaker 3>We are doing more. I can't I'm going to assure you.

0:25:37.960 --> 0:25:40.280
<v Speaker 1>Let me give you one book preaching. What about what

0:25:40.320 --> 0:25:43.639
<v Speaker 1>about increasing taxes on the wealthiest, like a forty percent tax, Right,

0:25:43.680 --> 0:25:46.000
<v Speaker 1>that's something Steve Bannon, who you know well, is in

0:25:46.040 --> 0:25:47.360
<v Speaker 1>favor of. Would you support it?

0:25:47.640 --> 0:25:49.960
<v Speaker 3>I supported that back in the first terms.

0:25:51.000 --> 0:25:56.520
<v Speaker 2>It's a debatable issue, but look, I always trust in

0:25:56.560 --> 0:25:59.800
<v Speaker 2>the president and he's playing three dimensional chess and I

0:26:00.240 --> 0:26:03.639
<v Speaker 2>it's like, you can have points of view, you win some,

0:26:03.760 --> 0:26:06.920
<v Speaker 2>you lose some, but I always trust his judgment. Now,

0:26:07.440 --> 0:26:09.879
<v Speaker 2>what you pulling that kind of out of left field?

0:26:10.160 --> 0:26:13.439
<v Speaker 2>I think the thing that we have to do here

0:26:13.800 --> 0:26:18.480
<v Speaker 2>in terms of the midterms is, first of all, explain

0:26:18.880 --> 0:26:24.040
<v Speaker 2>to people exactly what we're doing across the different areas

0:26:24.080 --> 0:26:29.040
<v Speaker 2>where we have problems with inflation, which is the housing,

0:26:29.680 --> 0:26:36.240
<v Speaker 2>the healthcare costs, food energy, Those are the biggies, and

0:26:36.440 --> 0:26:40.600
<v Speaker 2>we are as we speak, working twenty four hours a

0:26:40.680 --> 0:26:45.000
<v Speaker 2>day on things we can do to make that better.

0:26:45.560 --> 0:26:48.960
<v Speaker 1>You've got the Supreme Court case verdict coming up since

0:26:49.400 --> 0:26:51.159
<v Speaker 1>which a lot of people are preparing for it to

0:26:51.200 --> 0:26:54.680
<v Speaker 1>go against the government based on the comments that the

0:26:54.800 --> 0:26:59.560
<v Speaker 1>Justice is, including John Roberts May during questioning what happens

0:26:59.560 --> 0:27:02.919
<v Speaker 1>if the government loses the case? What does the plan be.

0:27:04.160 --> 0:27:05.560
<v Speaker 3>Let's start with the case itself.

0:27:06.000 --> 0:27:09.440
<v Speaker 2>The case is about whether you can use the emergency

0:27:09.520 --> 0:27:12.040
<v Speaker 2>powers of the president to impose.

0:27:11.800 --> 0:27:13.520
<v Speaker 1>Terrors, and it was your advice that he could. You

0:27:14.400 --> 0:27:16.119
<v Speaker 1>you were clear that this was the way the i

0:27:16.280 --> 0:27:18.120
<v Speaker 1>e e p A, this was the activity.

0:27:18.280 --> 0:27:22.960
<v Speaker 2>If the Supreme Court wants to essentially ratify the president's

0:27:23.080 --> 0:27:26.080
<v Speaker 2>use of terroiffs under i EPA, the law is on

0:27:26.440 --> 0:27:29.919
<v Speaker 2>its side and our side, and the law is simply this.

0:27:30.080 --> 0:27:35.000
<v Speaker 2>There's two salient points for your viewers. One is the

0:27:35.080 --> 0:27:40.040
<v Speaker 2>question of whether a tariff is a tax, and in

0:27:40.080 --> 0:27:43.359
<v Speaker 2>this context, in an emergency context, it's absolutely not.

0:27:43.920 --> 0:27:49.360
<v Speaker 3>Os revenues are incidental.

0:27:49.600 --> 0:27:49.760
<v Speaker 2>Now.

0:27:49.840 --> 0:27:55.720
<v Speaker 3>The other, the other issue is a language.

0:27:55.200 --> 0:28:00.000
<v Speaker 2>Issue, is whether terriffs are legitimate form of import restraint,

0:28:00.359 --> 0:28:03.600
<v Speaker 2>and of course they are. So the Supreme Court has

0:28:04.080 --> 0:28:07.480
<v Speaker 2>has the ability now with respect to Plan B. Whatever

0:28:07.600 --> 0:28:11.159
<v Speaker 2>Plan B is will not be as good as Plan A.

0:28:11.440 --> 0:28:13.919
<v Speaker 2>So we have to recognize that this will be ex.

0:28:14.720 --> 0:28:19.000
<v Speaker 1>Because doctor lots of companies will have to be compensated,

0:28:19.080 --> 0:28:20.800
<v Speaker 1>won't they For time.

0:28:20.640 --> 0:28:24.640
<v Speaker 3>Depends on what the discision. Let's not go there until

0:28:24.680 --> 0:28:25.480
<v Speaker 3>we have to go there.

0:28:25.520 --> 0:28:29.160
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I'm very confident that we have a very

0:28:29.320 --> 0:28:31.639
<v Speaker 2>very good chance. I mean, the laws on our side,

0:28:32.280 --> 0:28:35.720
<v Speaker 2>the laws on our side here, So let's win that. Now,

0:28:36.040 --> 0:28:39.720
<v Speaker 2>if we don't win, there's the whole alphabet number soup

0:28:39.880 --> 0:28:42.440
<v Speaker 2>of things we've got. We've got the Section two thirty

0:28:42.440 --> 0:28:46.720
<v Speaker 2>two's which which we are using aggressively already on things

0:28:46.760 --> 0:28:51.960
<v Speaker 2>like steel and aluminum, on lumber, on critical minerals and pharmaceuticals.

0:28:51.960 --> 0:28:52.440
<v Speaker 3>We have that.

0:28:53.120 --> 0:28:56.520
<v Speaker 2>We have the three oh one section, which we used

0:28:56.960 --> 0:29:00.200
<v Speaker 2>on China to impose tariffs, which we can.

0:29:00.120 --> 0:29:02.720
<v Speaker 3>Do on any country in the world. It's cheating us.

0:29:02.800 --> 0:29:05.600
<v Speaker 1>It is wrong. If this case goes against you, it

0:29:05.640 --> 0:29:08.120
<v Speaker 1>will affect your standing, won't it in the White House?

0:29:08.160 --> 0:29:11.360
<v Speaker 1>Because you were the one who was convinced that this

0:29:11.600 --> 0:29:13.920
<v Speaker 1>route was the right one to go down with the

0:29:13.920 --> 0:29:16.640
<v Speaker 1>bulk of tariff policy. Would you consider resigning if the

0:29:16.640 --> 0:29:17.360
<v Speaker 1>case is lost?

0:29:17.920 --> 0:29:21.280
<v Speaker 2>Of course, that's silly, I mean, and why I just like,

0:29:21.360 --> 0:29:24.360
<v Speaker 2>I'm part of a trade team. We've got Scott Bessett

0:29:24.640 --> 0:29:28.520
<v Speaker 2>as the Treasury Secretary, Howard Luttnik is the Commerce Secretary,

0:29:29.200 --> 0:29:35.240
<v Speaker 2>Jamis Career as the United States Trade Representative, and myself

0:29:36.200 --> 0:29:40.520
<v Speaker 2>with jd Vance Wayne In and the only person who

0:29:40.560 --> 0:29:42.000
<v Speaker 2>matters as President Trump.

0:29:42.480 --> 0:29:44.560
<v Speaker 3>Okay, so we.

0:29:44.520 --> 0:29:48.880
<v Speaker 2>Are proceeding as the vision of how to go about

0:29:48.920 --> 0:29:53.160
<v Speaker 2>this was crafted not by me, but by a group

0:29:53.200 --> 0:29:55.760
<v Speaker 2>of people. We're doing exactly what we should be doing.

0:29:56.400 --> 0:30:01.600
<v Speaker 2>We've anticipated contingencies, but we think that the most important

0:30:01.600 --> 0:30:04.440
<v Speaker 2>thing to do now is focus on winning that case

0:30:04.480 --> 0:30:06.960
<v Speaker 2>of the Supreme Court. That's where we're at. If we lose,

0:30:07.480 --> 0:30:10.040
<v Speaker 2>then we have a plan B. It's not for me

0:30:10.160 --> 0:30:13.400
<v Speaker 2>to talk about that to the world because I don't

0:30:13.400 --> 0:30:15.560
<v Speaker 2>think we're going to lose, but if we do, we

0:30:15.920 --> 0:30:16.920
<v Speaker 2>are certainly prepared.

0:30:17.360 --> 0:30:21.720
<v Speaker 1>Imagine the refund bill, which Thomas saying could be as

0:30:21.800 --> 0:30:23.240
<v Speaker 1>much as one hundred billion dollars.

0:30:23.720 --> 0:30:27.360
<v Speaker 2>I think you're basically making the case why what we've

0:30:27.360 --> 0:30:28.440
<v Speaker 2>done is a very good thing.

0:30:28.720 --> 0:30:29.520
<v Speaker 3>I mean, think about it.

0:30:29.520 --> 0:30:34.440
<v Speaker 2>We inherited from the Democrats who spent money, as we say,

0:30:34.480 --> 0:30:37.160
<v Speaker 2>on this side of the pond, like drunken sailors. Okay,

0:30:37.520 --> 0:30:42.880
<v Speaker 2>just totally fiscally irresponsibile, like crazy stuff. And we were

0:30:42.960 --> 0:30:46.880
<v Speaker 2>looking when we got into office at a fiscal cliff

0:30:47.000 --> 0:30:50.240
<v Speaker 2>that was going to crush us with higher interest rates,

0:30:50.320 --> 0:30:55.640
<v Speaker 2>inability to financy it, and and this tariff revenue, if

0:30:55.680 --> 0:30:59.600
<v Speaker 2>you just cost it out, is the difference between a

0:30:59.760 --> 0:31:05.200
<v Speaker 2>day injurious deficit and a healthy pay down in our debt.

0:31:05.360 --> 0:31:07.760
<v Speaker 1>We're coming towards towards the end of the conversation. And

0:31:07.840 --> 0:31:10.760
<v Speaker 1>I quite often ask people what they do at the weekends,

0:31:10.840 --> 0:31:14.040
<v Speaker 1>and I'm conscious, like, what are your weekends like work?

0:31:14.600 --> 0:31:17.440
<v Speaker 2>When you look, it's like when you're working for the

0:31:17.440 --> 0:31:21.640
<v Speaker 2>White House, it's like being at sea or being on

0:31:21.720 --> 0:31:23.120
<v Speaker 2>deployment for the military.

0:31:23.920 --> 0:31:25.200
<v Speaker 3>You're working every day.

0:31:25.480 --> 0:31:30.440
<v Speaker 2>And I know better than most because I remember the

0:31:30.520 --> 0:31:33.560
<v Speaker 2>last day from the first term and it was like,

0:31:33.880 --> 0:31:35.440
<v Speaker 2>you know, you're living in Wow.

0:31:35.600 --> 0:31:36.720
<v Speaker 3>There was some stuff we.

0:31:36.720 --> 0:31:38.840
<v Speaker 2>Left on the table we could have should have got done,

0:31:39.040 --> 0:31:42.480
<v Speaker 2>and we didn't. And I try to tell people who there,

0:31:42.600 --> 0:31:46.200
<v Speaker 2>it's like, look, the clock's ticking and we got a

0:31:46.200 --> 0:31:49.240
<v Speaker 2>lot of work to do for the American people. Spend

0:31:49.600 --> 0:31:53.320
<v Speaker 2>as much time as you can without it influencing or

0:31:53.360 --> 0:31:54.800
<v Speaker 2>harming your family time.

0:31:55.600 --> 0:31:59.320
<v Speaker 3>But this job is not a job. It's not a job.

0:31:59.360 --> 0:32:03.000
<v Speaker 3>It's a mission. I mean, there's no I mean, it's like,

0:32:03.040 --> 0:32:04.400
<v Speaker 3>if this were just a job.

0:32:04.280 --> 0:32:07.120
<v Speaker 2>I wouldn't be doing it because I'm I'm at the

0:32:07.200 --> 0:32:12.600
<v Speaker 2>retirement age and I could just as easily be working

0:32:12.680 --> 0:32:14.400
<v Speaker 2>on my next book or whatever.

0:32:14.520 --> 0:32:19.360
<v Speaker 1>But the White House team are in glossy photo shoots.

0:32:19.800 --> 0:32:20.880
<v Speaker 1>It's for Vanity Fair.

0:32:21.560 --> 0:32:24.760
<v Speaker 3>You know that funny you mentioned that.

0:32:25.320 --> 0:32:28.320
<v Speaker 2>Go to that Vanity Fair article and look at everybody

0:32:28.360 --> 0:32:31.200
<v Speaker 2>they took a picture of, and every one of those

0:32:31.560 --> 0:32:37.440
<v Speaker 2>persons and pictures looks demonic, demonic in those pictures. They

0:32:37.600 --> 0:32:41.080
<v Speaker 2>frame those pictures in a way to have you hate

0:32:41.080 --> 0:32:45.200
<v Speaker 2>those people, and that's despicable. That Vanity Fair thing is

0:32:45.240 --> 0:32:50.360
<v Speaker 2>a very sophisticated form of propaganda. It's basically the triumph

0:32:50.360 --> 0:32:54.000
<v Speaker 2>of fear over fact. And the guy who wrote it,

0:32:54.080 --> 0:32:59.240
<v Speaker 2>Chris Whipple, Shame on him. He was once a fairly

0:32:59.440 --> 0:33:03.640
<v Speaker 2>good offe. He's turned into a Trump arrangement syndrome guy.

0:33:03.760 --> 0:33:06.960
<v Speaker 1>And it's just quotes are on the record and they're

0:33:07.000 --> 0:33:07.360
<v Speaker 1>all on it.

0:33:07.640 --> 0:33:10.080
<v Speaker 3>Well, I would challenge that as well.

0:33:10.960 --> 0:33:14.160
<v Speaker 2>Just go look at those pictures. I mean, Caroline Leavitt,

0:33:14.560 --> 0:33:17.400
<v Speaker 2>the way they did, it's like they went in and

0:33:17.520 --> 0:33:21.080
<v Speaker 2>airbrushed that thing in a way, which I mean, it's

0:33:21.160 --> 0:33:23.520
<v Speaker 2>just it's brutal what they do.

0:33:23.680 --> 0:33:25.520
<v Speaker 1>Is that really what you're taking away from what I

0:33:25.640 --> 0:33:29.160
<v Speaker 1>was putting to you is that they're taking the time

0:33:29.280 --> 0:33:32.120
<v Speaker 1>to be in a vanity photo shoot. You're talking about

0:33:32.680 --> 0:33:34.400
<v Speaker 1>mission and you weren't in that photo.

0:33:34.560 --> 0:33:36.320
<v Speaker 3>No, no, no, no, no, no, no, no.

0:33:37.480 --> 0:33:41.000
<v Speaker 2>Like every one of those people in that article works

0:33:41.200 --> 0:33:45.080
<v Speaker 2>twice as much as anybody you know. Okay, they're they're

0:33:45.120 --> 0:33:50.640
<v Speaker 2>working NonStop and the pressure is hard. I mean, stuff

0:33:50.720 --> 0:33:54.640
<v Speaker 2>happens like on any given day. Stuff happens that you

0:33:54.720 --> 0:33:56.880
<v Speaker 2>got to figure out. You got to be quick on

0:33:56.920 --> 0:33:58.880
<v Speaker 2>your feet, you got to be able to do the

0:33:58.960 --> 0:34:02.480
<v Speaker 2>right thing. And I'm just saying that that Vanity Fair article,

0:34:02.920 --> 0:34:04.760
<v Speaker 2>it's just a study in propaganda.

0:34:05.600 --> 0:34:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Betanavarro, thank you very much for talking to us.

0:34:08.040 --> 0:34:08.480
<v Speaker 3>A pleasure.

0:34:10.760 --> 0:34:14.360
<v Speaker 1>That's the Michelle Hussein Show for this week. You'll find

0:34:14.440 --> 0:34:17.200
<v Speaker 1>our email in the show notes, so please do write

0:34:17.200 --> 0:34:20.120
<v Speaker 1>to us or leave us a comment, and don't forget.

0:34:20.160 --> 0:34:24.120
<v Speaker 1>These conversations are also in video as well as illustrated

0:34:24.200 --> 0:34:28.520
<v Speaker 1>versions with my notes at Bloomberg dot com, Slash Weekend

0:34:29.440 --> 0:34:33.280
<v Speaker 1>and so to the team producers Jessica Beck and Chris Martlieu.

0:34:33.719 --> 0:34:36.960
<v Speaker 1>Video editing is by Andy Hayward and Megan Olsen, and

0:34:37.040 --> 0:34:41.840
<v Speaker 1>social media by Alex Morgan. Richard Ward is our sound engineer.

0:34:42.120 --> 0:34:46.000
<v Speaker 1>The music is by Bart Walshaw, and the executive producer

0:34:46.400 --> 0:34:50.880
<v Speaker 1>is Louisa Lewis. At Bloomberg Weekend, Brendan Francis Newnham is

0:34:51.160 --> 0:34:55.800
<v Speaker 1>Editorial director of Audio and Special Projects, and our executive

0:34:55.920 --> 0:34:59.719
<v Speaker 1>editor is Catherine Bell. This week, we'd also like to

0:34:59.719 --> 0:35:04.000
<v Speaker 1>thank matt Shirley, Brendan Palmer, Joe Mattiere, and the Bloomberg

0:35:04.120 --> 0:35:14.120
<v Speaker 1>Podcast team. Until next time, goodbye,