WEBVTT - Ep 101 Immortality: This Podcast Won't Kill You

0:00:02.080 --> 0:00:06.160
<v Speaker 1>Hi everyone. Aaron here you are about to listen to

0:00:06.360 --> 0:00:11.719
<v Speaker 1>a very exciting episode on immortality. And this episode is

0:00:11.800 --> 0:00:15.720
<v Speaker 1>not just exciting because of the topic, but also because

0:00:15.920 --> 0:00:19.680
<v Speaker 1>it was going to be our one hundredth regular season episode.

0:00:20.360 --> 0:00:23.599
<v Speaker 1>But when things with monkeypox started to ramp up, we

0:00:23.720 --> 0:00:26.040
<v Speaker 1>decided that we wanted to make sure that we got

0:00:26.079 --> 0:00:29.560
<v Speaker 1>a monkey pox's episode out to you as quickly as possible,

0:00:30.160 --> 0:00:33.400
<v Speaker 1>and that meant pushing back this immortality episode, which we

0:00:33.440 --> 0:00:38.400
<v Speaker 1>had actually recorded before monkey pocks. So throughout this episode

0:00:38.560 --> 0:00:42.600
<v Speaker 1>you may hear references to this being our one hundredth episode,

0:00:43.080 --> 0:00:46.519
<v Speaker 1>even though it's actually episode one hundred and one, and

0:00:46.560 --> 0:00:50.239
<v Speaker 1>we just wanted to explain why in advance. Okay, I

0:00:50.320 --> 0:00:55.560
<v Speaker 1>think that about covers it, So let's get started introducing immortality.

0:00:58.160 --> 0:01:01.160
<v Speaker 1>The life that you seek you never will find. When

0:01:01.200 --> 0:01:05.840
<v Speaker 1>the gods created mankind death, they dispensed to mankind life

0:01:06.080 --> 0:01:10.440
<v Speaker 1>they kept for themselves. But you, Gilgamesh, Let your belly

0:01:10.480 --> 0:01:13.840
<v Speaker 1>be full, enjoy yourself always by day and by night.

0:01:14.440 --> 0:01:17.840
<v Speaker 1>Make mary each day, dance and play day and night.

0:01:18.480 --> 0:01:21.320
<v Speaker 1>Let your clothes be clean, Let your head be washed.

0:01:21.640 --> 0:01:24.560
<v Speaker 1>May you bathe in water. Gaze on the child who

0:01:24.560 --> 0:01:28.319
<v Speaker 1>holds your hand. Let your wife enjoy your repeated embrace.

0:02:14.400 --> 0:02:19.200
<v Speaker 2>I still don't actually know the story of Gilgamesh.

0:02:19.360 --> 0:02:22.680
<v Speaker 1>I still only know a little part of the story

0:02:22.720 --> 0:02:29.040
<v Speaker 1>of Gilgamesh. So yes, that was from the epic of Gilgamesh,

0:02:29.080 --> 0:02:32.160
<v Speaker 1>which is one of the oldest I think actually the

0:02:32.560 --> 0:02:37.240
<v Speaker 1>considered the oldest like surviving document or text.

0:02:37.680 --> 0:02:39.240
<v Speaker 2>Wow, that's amazing.

0:02:39.560 --> 0:02:43.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, it's from a long time ago, like two

0:02:43.760 --> 0:02:45.880
<v Speaker 1>thousand BCE something like that.

0:02:46.040 --> 0:02:46.639
<v Speaker 2>Wow.

0:02:47.320 --> 0:02:51.519
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Hi, I'm Aaron Welsh.

0:02:50.919 --> 0:02:53.120
<v Speaker 2>And I'm Aaron Allman Updike.

0:02:53.200 --> 0:02:55.400
<v Speaker 1>And this is this podcast will kill you.

0:02:55.720 --> 0:02:58.480
<v Speaker 2>And today we're not just like reading you the story

0:02:58.480 --> 0:03:00.239
<v Speaker 2>of Gilgamesh.

0:03:00.240 --> 0:03:05.600
<v Speaker 1>That's most of what you'll hear about Yogamesh.

0:03:05.680 --> 0:03:09.360
<v Speaker 2>Today, we're doing something very different in honor of our

0:03:09.760 --> 0:03:11.400
<v Speaker 2>one hundredth episode.

0:03:11.680 --> 0:03:15.600
<v Speaker 1>One hundredth I mean it is. I can't believe it.

0:03:15.880 --> 0:03:18.160
<v Speaker 2>I never would have thought we could make one hundred

0:03:18.200 --> 0:03:20.959
<v Speaker 2>episodes of a podcast, Darin either.

0:03:21.160 --> 0:03:24.119
<v Speaker 1>And Okay, here's the thing is that, like technically we

0:03:24.200 --> 0:03:27.119
<v Speaker 1>surpassed one hundred a long time.

0:03:27.200 --> 0:03:29.320
<v Speaker 2>That's true. I forgot about that with.

0:03:29.240 --> 0:03:32.120
<v Speaker 1>Like all the COVID episodes and all the bonus one

0:03:32.200 --> 0:03:36.920
<v Speaker 1>bonus episodes. Yeah, still, this is this is our like

0:03:37.000 --> 0:03:40.680
<v Speaker 1>our title episode one hundred, Yeah, and I think in

0:03:40.800 --> 0:03:44.000
<v Speaker 1>honor of that, as we slowly get around to talking

0:03:44.040 --> 0:03:48.400
<v Speaker 1>about what we're going to be talking about today, we

0:03:48.480 --> 0:03:51.720
<v Speaker 1>thought it would be fun to take the name of

0:03:51.720 --> 0:03:54.600
<v Speaker 1>our podcast and change it up a bit, right, this

0:03:54.720 --> 0:03:57.200
<v Speaker 1>podcast will kill you today.

0:03:57.760 --> 0:04:03.000
<v Speaker 2>This podcast won't kill you. Yeah, it might make you

0:04:03.120 --> 0:04:08.200
<v Speaker 2>live forever, probably not give you the secrets to eternal life.

0:04:09.080 --> 0:04:13.000
<v Speaker 1>Today, we're going to be talking about immortality and aging.

0:04:13.200 --> 0:04:17.320
<v Speaker 1>And it's definitely not going to be a comprehensive journey

0:04:17.480 --> 0:04:22.200
<v Speaker 1>through the history of aging and how immortality could be achieved,

0:04:22.720 --> 0:04:25.120
<v Speaker 1>but I think it's going to be a nice little taste.

0:04:25.160 --> 0:04:27.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, And our structure is going to be a little

0:04:27.560 --> 0:04:31.520
<v Speaker 2>different than usual because it's such an amorphist topic. Yeah.

0:04:31.560 --> 0:04:34.280
<v Speaker 1>So I'm going to be starting out talking about the

0:04:34.400 --> 0:04:39.000
<v Speaker 1>history of immortality and what that means in terms of evolution,

0:04:39.240 --> 0:04:42.200
<v Speaker 1>and then what that means in terms of like human culture,

0:04:42.279 --> 0:04:44.640
<v Speaker 1>and again it's just sort of like a brief, little

0:04:44.720 --> 0:04:46.880
<v Speaker 1>jump through, yeah topic.

0:04:46.920 --> 0:04:49.640
<v Speaker 2>And then I'm going to talk about I don't really

0:04:49.760 --> 0:04:56.200
<v Speaker 2>know what erin maybe like where we stand in terms

0:04:56.279 --> 0:05:00.720
<v Speaker 2>of like aging today or anti aging research or the

0:05:00.880 --> 0:05:04.600
<v Speaker 2>quest for immortality, what we know about the biology of it.

0:05:04.760 --> 0:05:05.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't know.

0:05:05.200 --> 0:05:07.800
<v Speaker 2>It's going to be a little bit of a conversation.

0:05:08.279 --> 0:05:11.880
<v Speaker 1>I think it's going to be really exciting and fun. Yeah,

0:05:12.080 --> 0:05:13.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm just looking.

0:05:12.760 --> 0:05:15.840
<v Speaker 2>Forward to us same same Well, speaking of like.

0:05:15.920 --> 0:05:18.760
<v Speaker 1>Tastes of things. What time is it?

0:05:18.839 --> 0:05:22.960
<v Speaker 2>Oh, quarantiny time still is quarantiny time.

0:05:22.960 --> 0:05:27.119
<v Speaker 1>Still is always quarantiny time. What are we drinking this week?

0:05:27.240 --> 0:05:30.120
<v Speaker 2>Well, of course we're drinking none other than the Elixir

0:05:30.200 --> 0:05:30.920
<v Speaker 2>of Life.

0:05:31.080 --> 0:05:35.400
<v Speaker 1>We are and in the Elixir of Life. It's a

0:05:35.800 --> 0:05:38.520
<v Speaker 1>it's a fun little it's a fun little drink because

0:05:38.720 --> 0:05:43.480
<v Speaker 1>we've got gin, we've got lemon juice, we've got blackberries,

0:05:43.520 --> 0:05:46.680
<v Speaker 1>we've got simple syrup. And then to kind of like

0:05:46.839 --> 0:05:51.720
<v Speaker 1>create the fun little magical I don't know aura around it,

0:05:52.200 --> 0:05:56.240
<v Speaker 1>we've got butterfly pea flower extract, which was sent to

0:05:56.320 --> 0:06:00.360
<v Speaker 1>us by a very generous listener, so thank you so much.

0:06:00.520 --> 0:06:02.720
<v Speaker 1>It is such a cool looking drink.

0:06:03.320 --> 0:06:05.719
<v Speaker 2>It's a nice I'm really excited about. I want to

0:06:05.720 --> 0:06:08.560
<v Speaker 2>come visit you so that I can actually taste it.

0:06:09.640 --> 0:06:14.039
<v Speaker 1>Okay, let's make that happen. Yeah, we will post the

0:06:14.120 --> 0:06:17.680
<v Speaker 1>full recipe for the Elixir of Life as well. As

0:06:17.720 --> 0:06:20.880
<v Speaker 1>the non alcoholic place Rita on our website This podcast

0:06:20.960 --> 0:06:23.400
<v Speaker 1>will kill You dot Com, as well as on all

0:06:23.400 --> 0:06:25.360
<v Speaker 1>of our social media channels.

0:06:25.360 --> 0:06:27.960
<v Speaker 2>Our website This podcast will kill You dot Com. If

0:06:28.000 --> 0:06:29.960
<v Speaker 2>you haven't been there yet, you should go and check

0:06:30.000 --> 0:06:34.360
<v Speaker 2>it out. After one hundred episodes, try it. We have

0:06:34.600 --> 0:06:37.960
<v Speaker 2>merch we have transcripts. We have links to our bookshop

0:06:37.960 --> 0:06:42.440
<v Speaker 2>dot org affiliate account. We have links to our music bloodmobile.

0:06:42.920 --> 0:06:46.120
<v Speaker 2>We have a good Reads list, we have all of

0:06:46.160 --> 0:06:49.160
<v Speaker 2>our sources for all of our episodes. We have our Patreon.

0:06:49.320 --> 0:06:52.960
<v Speaker 2>We have more than I could say in that single breath.

0:06:53.160 --> 0:06:55.440
<v Speaker 1>Well, I think you did a great job. Thanks, loving

0:06:55.480 --> 0:06:57.520
<v Speaker 1>all right, any other business?

0:06:57.760 --> 0:07:01.279
<v Speaker 2>No, Aaron, please tell me, like I don't know, from

0:07:01.320 --> 0:07:06.120
<v Speaker 2>Gilgamesh to now, how has humanity fared on our quest

0:07:06.120 --> 0:07:06.960
<v Speaker 2>for immortality?

0:07:07.800 --> 0:07:11.000
<v Speaker 1>Great questions there I will, I will do my very

0:07:11.000 --> 0:07:45.720
<v Speaker 1>best right after this break. Like we said, this is

0:07:46.080 --> 0:07:50.080
<v Speaker 1>definitely not our typical format. But then again, this is

0:07:50.240 --> 0:07:54.360
<v Speaker 1>not our typical episode topic. So the focus of our

0:07:54.400 --> 0:07:59.600
<v Speaker 1>episode today is immortality. But what does that mean? Not

0:07:59.840 --> 0:08:02.040
<v Speaker 1>just like what are we going to cover, but the

0:08:02.080 --> 0:08:07.560
<v Speaker 1>word or the concept itself is immortality, simply living forever,

0:08:08.440 --> 0:08:13.480
<v Speaker 1>not aging, being invulnerable to any illness or injury. Does

0:08:13.520 --> 0:08:15.880
<v Speaker 1>it mean that your name and life will be remembered

0:08:16.040 --> 0:08:19.360
<v Speaker 1>hundreds of years from now, or that your genes will

0:08:19.400 --> 0:08:22.320
<v Speaker 1>be carried on in your offspring and their offspring, and

0:08:22.360 --> 0:08:25.240
<v Speaker 1>so on and so on down the line. There are

0:08:25.280 --> 0:08:28.440
<v Speaker 1>many different ways that we can think of and have

0:08:28.640 --> 0:08:32.880
<v Speaker 1>thought of immortality. And if your goal is to achieve immortality,

0:08:33.160 --> 0:08:37.720
<v Speaker 1>which definition you choose has tremendous bearing on how you

0:08:37.760 --> 0:08:40.440
<v Speaker 1>go about that, And that can also be said for

0:08:40.480 --> 0:08:46.839
<v Speaker 1>this episode. So how will we consider immortality today? Really,

0:08:46.880 --> 0:08:49.800
<v Speaker 1>we'll at least touch on the most common concepts in

0:08:49.800 --> 0:08:54.680
<v Speaker 1>a general sense, but since we're a health and science podcast,

0:08:55.160 --> 0:08:57.840
<v Speaker 1>most of what we'll talk about is immortality from a

0:08:57.880 --> 0:09:03.360
<v Speaker 1>biological perspective. First by talking about not what immortality is

0:09:03.559 --> 0:09:06.839
<v Speaker 1>and how we can achieve it, but what stops us

0:09:06.880 --> 0:09:10.960
<v Speaker 1>from being immortal in the first place? Why do we die?

0:09:11.800 --> 0:09:15.080
<v Speaker 1>Why do we decline as we get older? Are there

0:09:15.120 --> 0:09:18.880
<v Speaker 1>any organisms that don't? What do we know or think

0:09:18.920 --> 0:09:23.640
<v Speaker 1>about senescence, the decline or deterioration we experience as we

0:09:23.720 --> 0:09:28.280
<v Speaker 1>age from an evolutionary perspective, And then all turn from

0:09:28.480 --> 0:09:32.120
<v Speaker 1>that to talking about the age long quest for immortality,

0:09:32.600 --> 0:09:36.560
<v Speaker 1>which has roots much much older than these startups in

0:09:36.760 --> 0:09:39.800
<v Speaker 1>Silicon Valley that have been looking for modern elixirs of

0:09:39.840 --> 0:09:41.520
<v Speaker 1>life that I know you're going to be talking a

0:09:41.520 --> 0:09:45.720
<v Speaker 1>bit more about, Aaron Yeap. What patterns do we see

0:09:45.840 --> 0:09:49.720
<v Speaker 1>in the different ways that people have approached immortality through history?

0:09:50.360 --> 0:09:53.640
<v Speaker 1>And how has this past century and our ever growing

0:09:53.720 --> 0:09:59.280
<v Speaker 1>understanding of biology changed the targets for immortality research. And

0:09:59.280 --> 0:10:00.760
<v Speaker 1>then that's sort of where I'll hands it off to

0:10:00.800 --> 0:10:03.600
<v Speaker 1>you Erin to tell us how close we are or

0:10:03.760 --> 0:10:08.240
<v Speaker 1>probably aren't to achieving immortality and the nitty gritty of

0:10:08.280 --> 0:10:12.040
<v Speaker 1>what people are working on. Okay, okay, all right, so

0:10:12.320 --> 0:10:16.880
<v Speaker 1>let's get into it. Living things age, but they don't

0:10:16.920 --> 0:10:20.680
<v Speaker 1>just experience the passage of time. They also change as

0:10:20.720 --> 0:10:24.720
<v Speaker 1>time passes, first growing and developing, and then at a

0:10:24.760 --> 0:10:28.200
<v Speaker 1>certain point that growth ceases and a new kind of

0:10:28.280 --> 0:10:32.360
<v Speaker 1>change occurs, one where maybe things don't heal quite as

0:10:32.360 --> 0:10:35.680
<v Speaker 1>fast as they used to, or those aches and pains

0:10:35.720 --> 0:10:40.800
<v Speaker 1>get more frequent, and eventually recovery is no longer a possibility,

0:10:41.400 --> 0:10:45.240
<v Speaker 1>with death being the ultimate end. And this is generally

0:10:45.280 --> 0:10:49.360
<v Speaker 1>how it happens for every living thing. And sure, the

0:10:49.400 --> 0:10:51.920
<v Speaker 1>amount of time that you spend in each life stage

0:10:52.000 --> 0:10:54.760
<v Speaker 1>may be different, or how long you can expect to

0:10:54.800 --> 0:10:59.240
<v Speaker 1>live will vary, but death and aging are essential parts

0:10:59.400 --> 0:11:03.480
<v Speaker 1>of life, even for those supposedly immortal animals that you

0:11:03.559 --> 0:11:06.959
<v Speaker 1>see like click bait headlines about like lobsters or certain

0:11:07.000 --> 0:11:12.800
<v Speaker 1>jellyfish or bristle cone pines. But while senescence, the biological

0:11:12.880 --> 0:11:17.079
<v Speaker 1>decline part of aging may not be as marked as

0:11:17.120 --> 0:11:21.600
<v Speaker 1>in other creatures, those organisms are not truly immortal. They

0:11:21.720 --> 0:11:27.000
<v Speaker 1>will die eventually because nothing living is immune to death.

0:11:28.480 --> 0:11:31.400
<v Speaker 1>Why does this have to happen? Like, why can't we

0:11:31.440 --> 0:11:34.800
<v Speaker 1>go on living forever? Well, let's think about it in

0:11:34.840 --> 0:11:38.120
<v Speaker 1>the context of natural selection and evolutionary fitness.

0:11:38.720 --> 0:11:39.480
<v Speaker 2>That's arh.

0:11:40.920 --> 0:11:44.520
<v Speaker 1>Evolutionary fitness, for those who haven't heard the term before,

0:11:45.160 --> 0:11:50.480
<v Speaker 1>is essentially an individual's reproductive success how many offspring they have.

0:11:51.440 --> 0:11:55.760
<v Speaker 1>If an individual has no offspring, zero fitness. If they

0:11:55.840 --> 0:11:59.760
<v Speaker 1>don't survive long enough to reproduce, fitness is also zero.

0:12:00.559 --> 0:12:03.559
<v Speaker 1>But the individuals who do live long enough to reproduce

0:12:03.679 --> 0:12:06.240
<v Speaker 1>and have a lot of offspring, those are the ones

0:12:06.280 --> 0:12:08.240
<v Speaker 1>who are going to contribute the most to the next

0:12:08.280 --> 0:12:12.920
<v Speaker 1>generation's gene pool. Traits that limit your ability to reproduce

0:12:13.120 --> 0:12:17.640
<v Speaker 1>or survive through reproductive age. Those traits lower your fitness

0:12:17.760 --> 0:12:20.000
<v Speaker 1>and make it less likely for those genes to be

0:12:20.040 --> 0:12:24.160
<v Speaker 1>passed on to the next generation. And over time those

0:12:24.280 --> 0:12:28.400
<v Speaker 1>traits those genes will become less and less common, maybe

0:12:28.520 --> 0:12:32.040
<v Speaker 1>eventually disappearing. But traits that make you more likely to

0:12:32.080 --> 0:12:36.000
<v Speaker 1>reproduce or survive through the end of reproductive age, those

0:12:36.040 --> 0:12:38.040
<v Speaker 1>are the traits that are going to be selected for

0:12:38.360 --> 0:12:41.800
<v Speaker 1>becoming more common. So we can think of tons of

0:12:41.840 --> 0:12:45.600
<v Speaker 1>examples of this, right, like the size of a bird's beak,

0:12:46.000 --> 0:12:50.520
<v Speaker 1>or the rate of development of a tadpole into a frog,

0:12:51.240 --> 0:12:55.880
<v Speaker 1>or fur pattern or susceptibility to disease. But what's so

0:12:56.040 --> 0:13:00.720
<v Speaker 1>crucial about this for this discussion is not the trait themselves,

0:13:00.760 --> 0:13:04.800
<v Speaker 1>not these examples, but rather the time window when these

0:13:04.840 --> 0:13:09.240
<v Speaker 1>traits matter most, and that is the critical period from

0:13:09.280 --> 0:13:12.880
<v Speaker 1>basically prenatal development all the way through the end of

0:13:12.960 --> 0:13:16.400
<v Speaker 1>when you are able to reproduce. That is when selection

0:13:16.520 --> 0:13:21.280
<v Speaker 1>can act. With this in mind, what does it matter

0:13:21.679 --> 0:13:25.199
<v Speaker 1>really in terms of natural selection if you live past

0:13:25.280 --> 0:13:27.880
<v Speaker 1>reproductive age. It doesn't.

0:13:28.280 --> 0:13:29.199
<v Speaker 2>It doesn't at all.

0:13:29.280 --> 0:13:32.520
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't. Yeah, if there are genes that affect at

0:13:32.600 --> 0:13:36.600
<v Speaker 1>least in part your longevity. How will natural selection act

0:13:36.640 --> 0:13:38.679
<v Speaker 1>on them if they don't have any bearing on your

0:13:38.720 --> 0:13:43.360
<v Speaker 1>reproductive fitness. It won't, It won't, I mean, And there

0:13:43.440 --> 0:13:49.080
<v Speaker 1>are genes in humans that are associated with longevity, but

0:13:49.120 --> 0:13:52.720
<v Speaker 1>it's likely that those play a role in maintenance or development,

0:13:53.120 --> 0:13:58.120
<v Speaker 1>and they don't just switch on later in life exactly. Yeah.

0:13:58.160 --> 0:14:01.160
<v Speaker 1>So essentially, in terms of natural select it doesn't really

0:14:01.200 --> 0:14:04.040
<v Speaker 1>matter how long we live past the point when we're

0:14:04.040 --> 0:14:09.520
<v Speaker 1>no longer reproductively viable. And this is of course like

0:14:10.280 --> 0:14:14.679
<v Speaker 1>a big oversimplification, and for humans and other animals, there

0:14:14.720 --> 0:14:19.880
<v Speaker 1>are some very interesting hypotheses about why we humans live

0:14:20.000 --> 0:14:24.240
<v Speaker 1>long past the age we reproduce, mostly centering around grandparents,

0:14:24.280 --> 0:14:26.960
<v Speaker 1>and I'd love to get into that one day with

0:14:27.040 --> 0:14:28.840
<v Speaker 1>an episode on menopause. Oh.

0:14:29.000 --> 0:14:31.400
<v Speaker 2>I we'll definitely do it on menopause because I love

0:14:31.560 --> 0:14:36.440
<v Speaker 2>all of the evolutionary theories behind menopause and just like aging,

0:14:36.640 --> 0:14:37.840
<v Speaker 2>and like the grandparents.

0:14:37.920 --> 0:14:41.400
<v Speaker 1>Oh, I love the grandparent hypothesis. Oh it's so interesting.

0:14:41.520 --> 0:14:42.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I love it.

0:14:43.440 --> 0:14:47.280
<v Speaker 1>But anyway, we humans are not unique in that we

0:14:47.320 --> 0:14:50.400
<v Speaker 1>live past the age we reproduce, nor are we unique

0:14:50.440 --> 0:14:52.840
<v Speaker 1>in the fact that our bodies and minds start to

0:14:52.880 --> 0:14:57.120
<v Speaker 1>deteriorate as we get older. And even if life past

0:14:57.200 --> 0:15:01.320
<v Speaker 1>reproduction is not part of natural selection, what makes us

0:15:01.360 --> 0:15:06.400
<v Speaker 1>and other organisms age? Like? Why do we age? And

0:15:06.440 --> 0:15:11.040
<v Speaker 1>we have been asking ourselves this question, probably since we

0:15:11.040 --> 0:15:15.160
<v Speaker 1>were able to form thought, but it wasn't until Charles

0:15:15.240 --> 0:15:18.720
<v Speaker 1>Darwin introduced the theory of evolution by natural selection in

0:15:18.720 --> 0:15:22.720
<v Speaker 1>the mid nineteenth century that people had a scientific framework

0:15:22.760 --> 0:15:25.120
<v Speaker 1>that they could use to try to answer this question.

0:15:26.040 --> 0:15:29.880
<v Speaker 1>Since that time, many different hypotheses have been proposed, none

0:15:29.920 --> 0:15:34.000
<v Speaker 1>of which seem to adequately explain sinessence for every living thing.

0:15:34.760 --> 0:15:37.080
<v Speaker 1>And I'm going to briefly go through a few of

0:15:37.120 --> 0:15:40.560
<v Speaker 1>the classical hypotheses of sinessence so that we can try

0:15:40.560 --> 0:15:44.000
<v Speaker 1>to think about possible mechanisms that could explain why aging

0:15:44.240 --> 0:15:49.560
<v Speaker 1>is universal. The first of these hypotheses was proposed in

0:15:49.600 --> 0:15:54.360
<v Speaker 1>the eighteen nineties by the German evolutionary biologist August Weismann

0:15:54.480 --> 0:15:58.960
<v Speaker 1>the so called germ soma theory, and so Weisman suggested

0:15:58.960 --> 0:16:01.920
<v Speaker 1>that there were two types of cell lines in an organism,

0:16:02.280 --> 0:16:05.560
<v Speaker 1>a germ line and a soma or body line, and

0:16:05.600 --> 0:16:07.720
<v Speaker 1>the germ line is made up of the cells that

0:16:07.760 --> 0:16:11.240
<v Speaker 1>are involved in reproduction and the soma line consists of

0:16:11.280 --> 0:16:14.440
<v Speaker 1>the cells that make up the rest of the body.

0:16:14.560 --> 0:16:17.720
<v Speaker 1>It's the sole duty of the soma cells to do

0:16:17.920 --> 0:16:21.800
<v Speaker 1>whatever it takes to keep the germ line alive and reproducing.

0:16:22.520 --> 0:16:27.080
<v Speaker 1>Beyond that, soma cells basically disposable, and the soma cell

0:16:27.160 --> 0:16:30.640
<v Speaker 1>lineage will invariably die, while the germ cell lineage can

0:16:30.720 --> 0:16:35.920
<v Speaker 1>be viewed as potentially immortal. Aging happens as the soma

0:16:36.000 --> 0:16:38.760
<v Speaker 1>line gets beat up by the environment while protecting the

0:16:38.800 --> 0:16:44.080
<v Speaker 1>germ line. And that's the hypothesis. Yeah, obviously it has

0:16:44.120 --> 0:16:48.280
<v Speaker 1>many shortcomings, first of them being that it doesn't really

0:16:48.400 --> 0:16:53.360
<v Speaker 1>explain why sinessence evolved, like why the soma is disposable,

0:16:54.160 --> 0:16:58.440
<v Speaker 1>and it doesn't explain sinessence in single celled organisms. But

0:16:58.520 --> 0:17:01.920
<v Speaker 1>it did introduce the idea that reproduction is first and

0:17:02.000 --> 0:17:06.600
<v Speaker 1>foremost the priority, and many later researchers built upon this idea,

0:17:06.840 --> 0:17:11.240
<v Speaker 1>such as the famous mathematician and eugenicist Ronald Fisher, who

0:17:11.320 --> 0:17:14.400
<v Speaker 1>in the nineteen thirties proposed a mathematical model in which

0:17:14.440 --> 0:17:17.560
<v Speaker 1>he laid out his thoughts that sinessence was the accumulation

0:17:17.760 --> 0:17:21.920
<v Speaker 1>of harmful age specific traits. A couple of decades later,

0:17:22.040 --> 0:17:26.040
<v Speaker 1>in the nineteen fifties, Peter Medowar, whose name you might

0:17:26.240 --> 0:17:32.600
<v Speaker 1>remember from our organ transplantation episode. He wrote a now

0:17:32.680 --> 0:17:36.480
<v Speaker 1>famous essay describing how the force of selection weakens as

0:17:36.520 --> 0:17:40.560
<v Speaker 1>we get older and past our reproductive age. He wasn't

0:17:40.720 --> 0:17:44.439
<v Speaker 1>entirely right either, For instance, his belief that animals in

0:17:44.440 --> 0:17:47.600
<v Speaker 1>the wild don't get old they don't siness because they

0:17:47.640 --> 0:17:50.520
<v Speaker 1>just get picked off by predators or succumb to starvation.

0:17:51.160 --> 0:17:54.679
<v Speaker 1>They actually do siness, they actually do get older. But

0:17:54.800 --> 0:17:58.280
<v Speaker 1>his essay did suggest a sort of mechanism for Sinessence,

0:17:59.040 --> 0:18:03.119
<v Speaker 1>if there are genes that do exist that shorten our lifespan,

0:18:03.400 --> 0:18:06.200
<v Speaker 1>they won't really be selected against if they only show

0:18:06.200 --> 0:18:09.560
<v Speaker 1>their effects later in life, and so they will continue

0:18:09.560 --> 0:18:15.040
<v Speaker 1>to appear and accumulate over generations. The quote mutation accumulation theory.

0:18:15.600 --> 0:18:20.159
<v Speaker 2>That's I love. Sorry, I just really do love these hypotheses.

0:18:20.440 --> 0:18:21.000
<v Speaker 1>I do too.

0:18:21.320 --> 0:18:22.560
<v Speaker 2>I find it really fun.

0:18:22.920 --> 0:18:25.840
<v Speaker 1>It was it was so interesting because I have never

0:18:26.600 --> 0:18:29.320
<v Speaker 1>even though I said, humans have probably asked themselves this

0:18:29.440 --> 0:18:33.720
<v Speaker 1>question forever, and I've probably asked myself this question too,

0:18:34.040 --> 0:18:36.840
<v Speaker 1>but not in like a okay, but why what is

0:18:36.880 --> 0:18:39.440
<v Speaker 1>the actual evolutionary mechanism behind it?

0:18:39.840 --> 0:18:43.320
<v Speaker 2>I feel like I only ever thought about another hypothesis.

0:18:43.320 --> 0:18:45.879
<v Speaker 2>I think you're probably going to talk about next in

0:18:45.960 --> 0:18:48.320
<v Speaker 2>the context of the evolution of human health class that

0:18:48.359 --> 0:18:51.520
<v Speaker 2>I ta' for. So that was like a very specific

0:18:51.960 --> 0:18:54.159
<v Speaker 2>subset of time that I was thinking about it.

0:18:54.480 --> 0:18:57.159
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it is. It's so fun to think about. Okay,

0:18:57.200 --> 0:18:58.680
<v Speaker 1>so there are there are a few more.

0:18:59.040 --> 0:18:59.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:18:59.640 --> 0:19:04.159
<v Speaker 1>So. Years after Metowar's essay, George Williams added on to

0:19:04.240 --> 0:19:07.920
<v Speaker 1>this by suggesting that in addition to these mutations appearing,

0:19:08.440 --> 0:19:11.720
<v Speaker 1>it's also possible that those genes that are helpful early

0:19:11.800 --> 0:19:15.840
<v Speaker 1>in life, like in development and during reproduction, could also

0:19:15.920 --> 0:19:19.280
<v Speaker 1>be bad or have negative effects later in life. Like,

0:19:19.440 --> 0:19:23.600
<v Speaker 1>for instance, let's think about cell growth. If your cells

0:19:23.680 --> 0:19:28.280
<v Speaker 1>grow super fast, that's potentially great when you're developing right,

0:19:28.400 --> 0:19:33.800
<v Speaker 1>you get larger faster and can be independent faster. But

0:19:34.040 --> 0:19:38.840
<v Speaker 1>later on that could mean uncontrolled cell growth aka cancer.

0:19:40.240 --> 0:19:40.520
<v Speaker 2>Yep.

0:19:41.000 --> 0:19:43.840
<v Speaker 1>And this is something that's called antagonistic pliotropy.

0:19:44.200 --> 0:19:47.000
<v Speaker 2>It's one of my favorite concepts and I love it.

0:19:46.680 --> 0:19:49.520
<v Speaker 1>It's so it's I mean, and it like the thing

0:19:49.640 --> 0:19:51.840
<v Speaker 1>they all make sense, And the thing that I like

0:19:51.880 --> 0:19:53.800
<v Speaker 1>too about them is that none of them are really

0:19:54.720 --> 0:19:56.760
<v Speaker 1>mutually exclusive.

0:19:56.680 --> 0:20:00.879
<v Speaker 2>Exactly like you have, you can easily we have mutations

0:20:00.880 --> 0:20:04.280
<v Speaker 2>that accumulate as well as have genes that are beneficial

0:20:04.320 --> 0:20:07.320
<v Speaker 2>early in life and maybe have a detriment later in life.

0:20:07.320 --> 0:20:12.120
<v Speaker 2>So like these mutation, accumulation, antagonistic piotropy, these hypotheses really

0:20:12.160 --> 0:20:16.119
<v Speaker 2>do work together to explain aging in a way that

0:20:16.200 --> 0:20:17.440
<v Speaker 2>I think is just fascinating.

0:20:17.640 --> 0:20:22.479
<v Speaker 1>Yep, yeah, exactly. And also what really helped things along

0:20:22.560 --> 0:20:26.200
<v Speaker 1>in this in this field was when in nineteen sixty

0:20:26.200 --> 0:20:30.159
<v Speaker 1>six William Hamilton combined some of these existing ideas on

0:20:30.400 --> 0:20:34.439
<v Speaker 1>the evolution of aging into a mathematical model, which, like,

0:20:35.000 --> 0:20:38.000
<v Speaker 1>maybe that doesn't sound very exciting, but it really is.

0:20:38.080 --> 0:20:41.960
<v Speaker 1>It was, and it's still today is super impactful because

0:20:42.000 --> 0:20:45.320
<v Speaker 1>it laid out a framework for why aging happens, and

0:20:45.400 --> 0:20:48.360
<v Speaker 1>it also showed that the strength of selection on traits

0:20:48.359 --> 0:20:51.880
<v Speaker 1>that keep you alive it becomes weaker over time in

0:20:51.920 --> 0:20:56.879
<v Speaker 1>anything that ages and doesn't reproduce via fission. Yeah. Really,

0:20:57.000 --> 0:20:59.240
<v Speaker 1>Also what it did was create a math model for

0:20:59.280 --> 0:21:02.120
<v Speaker 1>people to be able to to test ideas about aging.

0:21:03.520 --> 0:21:06.639
<v Speaker 1>The last of the classical hypotheses of sinessence I'm going

0:21:06.720 --> 0:21:11.240
<v Speaker 1>to talk about is the quote disposable soma theory. Proposed

0:21:11.280 --> 0:21:15.040
<v Speaker 1>by Thomas Kirkwood in nineteen seventy seven, which says that

0:21:15.119 --> 0:21:20.840
<v Speaker 1>over time and organism cells accumulate harmful genetic mutations. Mutations

0:21:20.840 --> 0:21:24.159
<v Speaker 1>in your DNA happen randomly all the time because of

0:21:24.280 --> 0:21:28.760
<v Speaker 1>environmental factors or mistakes in DNA replication, and it gets

0:21:28.800 --> 0:21:32.600
<v Speaker 1>increasingly costly to repair the damage from these mutations, and

0:21:32.800 --> 0:21:36.080
<v Speaker 1>at a certain point, the benefit of repairing the damage

0:21:36.160 --> 0:21:40.280
<v Speaker 1>is outweighed by the cost repair and maintenance is always

0:21:40.320 --> 0:21:44.359
<v Speaker 1>going to favor the germline. Okay, so these are just

0:21:44.440 --> 0:21:48.280
<v Speaker 1>a few of the most impactful hypotheses to explain why

0:21:48.320 --> 0:21:52.760
<v Speaker 1>sinessence evolved, but there are certainly others, and no single

0:21:52.840 --> 0:21:56.119
<v Speaker 1>hypothesis at this point seems to be able to explain

0:21:56.200 --> 0:22:01.680
<v Speaker 1>aging for all organisms. There's no unifying hypothesis, probably because

0:22:01.840 --> 0:22:08.560
<v Speaker 1>like there's tremendous diversity in life, no is there.

0:22:08.480 --> 0:22:11.159
<v Speaker 2>Really are I mean that like a bristle combe pine

0:22:11.240 --> 0:22:13.120
<v Speaker 2>is not the same thing as a plenariat.

0:22:13.280 --> 0:22:19.160
<v Speaker 1>It might not be, and even some of the fundamental

0:22:19.160 --> 0:22:26.040
<v Speaker 1>assumptions about aging have been challenged. It's an extraordinarily complicated

0:22:26.040 --> 0:22:30.320
<v Speaker 1>thing to study. You have to capture both how different

0:22:30.440 --> 0:22:35.160
<v Speaker 1>environments and different genes impact aging. You have to consider

0:22:35.200 --> 0:22:40.040
<v Speaker 1>ecological factors, determine whether aging in the lab is different

0:22:40.160 --> 0:22:43.600
<v Speaker 1>or the same as aging in the wild, evaluate whether

0:22:43.680 --> 0:22:47.720
<v Speaker 1>closely related species age more similarly than distantly related ones.

0:22:48.600 --> 0:22:51.760
<v Speaker 1>And the biggest thing in my eyes is that we've

0:22:51.800 --> 0:22:54.760
<v Speaker 1>really only begun looking at this within the past one

0:22:54.880 --> 0:22:58.040
<v Speaker 1>hundred and thirty years or so, which is shorter than

0:22:58.080 --> 0:23:01.240
<v Speaker 1>the average lifespan of some organs. That could give us

0:23:01.480 --> 0:23:04.000
<v Speaker 1>really valuable insight into longevity.

0:23:04.680 --> 0:23:06.520
<v Speaker 2>Good point, So, like, how do you how do.

0:23:06.480 --> 0:23:10.480
<v Speaker 1>You create a data set? Yeah, for giant tortoise?

0:23:11.040 --> 0:23:15.480
<v Speaker 2>Right, well, even studying human aging, like we live a

0:23:15.520 --> 0:23:17.359
<v Speaker 2>really long time, right, and.

0:23:17.440 --> 0:23:20.640
<v Speaker 1>There have been really cool like census records and especially

0:23:20.640 --> 0:23:24.000
<v Speaker 1>in certain countries or certain regions that keep really good

0:23:24.040 --> 0:23:28.680
<v Speaker 1>track of like people through time, but we still don't

0:23:28.680 --> 0:23:30.520
<v Speaker 1>have all the bits of information there, right.

0:23:30.760 --> 0:23:31.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:23:31.760 --> 0:23:36.280
<v Speaker 1>So it's it's in a way we've been thinking about

0:23:36.320 --> 0:23:38.160
<v Speaker 1>it for a long time, but it seems like we're

0:23:38.200 --> 0:23:41.920
<v Speaker 1>definitely in the infancy of having data to be able

0:23:41.960 --> 0:23:43.240
<v Speaker 1>to test these hypotheses.

0:23:43.520 --> 0:23:45.520
<v Speaker 2>Aaron, you just summed up my whole section.

0:23:50.200 --> 0:23:53.640
<v Speaker 1>It's it was it was really interesting to read through

0:23:53.680 --> 0:23:57.560
<v Speaker 1>this also because I don't think I realized just how

0:23:57.880 --> 0:24:01.280
<v Speaker 1>huge of a field of study this, And I guess

0:24:01.280 --> 0:24:04.320
<v Speaker 1>I should have because there are like, you know, entire

0:24:04.400 --> 0:24:09.000
<v Speaker 1>journals and entire textbooks at entire companies and everything, but

0:24:09.200 --> 0:24:14.639
<v Speaker 1>like it is, it is really hard to do it justice. Yeah, yeah,

0:24:14.960 --> 0:24:18.199
<v Speaker 1>so yeah, So I just kind of wanted to like

0:24:18.359 --> 0:24:22.080
<v Speaker 1>wander through some of these ideas and kind of fell

0:24:22.480 --> 0:24:26.000
<v Speaker 1>and build a baseline for thinking about aging in an

0:24:26.040 --> 0:24:29.800
<v Speaker 1>evolutionary context, especially when it comes to like natural selection

0:24:30.520 --> 0:24:33.119
<v Speaker 1>and wouldn't it be great if we lived forever but

0:24:33.280 --> 0:24:38.720
<v Speaker 1>we don't really need to, yeah, in terms of our DNA.

0:24:38.400 --> 0:24:40.560
<v Speaker 2>Getting passed on, Yeah, exactly.

0:24:40.880 --> 0:24:43.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And I also thought it was important to think

0:24:44.040 --> 0:24:49.520
<v Speaker 1>about these things like why we age before we start

0:24:49.920 --> 0:24:53.760
<v Speaker 1>exploring some of the ways that we've tried and continue

0:24:53.800 --> 0:24:59.600
<v Speaker 1>to try to stop or slow that process. So, if

0:24:59.680 --> 0:25:02.920
<v Speaker 1>they're there is anything that humans are good at, it's

0:25:02.960 --> 0:25:08.399
<v Speaker 1>searching for the key to immortality. We're really good at

0:25:08.440 --> 0:25:12.400
<v Speaker 1>searching for it, but we are terrible at finding it. Yeah,

0:25:12.480 --> 0:25:17.560
<v Speaker 1>because we've not found it. Yeah, spoilers, we don't have it. Spoilers,

0:25:17.600 --> 0:25:21.280
<v Speaker 1>we don't have it. We may not have it ever.

0:25:22.720 --> 0:25:28.159
<v Speaker 1>Immortality narratives are central to every culture and religion, like

0:25:28.200 --> 0:25:32.800
<v Speaker 1>the Epic of Gilgamesh, the oldest known written document. So

0:25:33.480 --> 0:25:36.600
<v Speaker 1>the reason that I included Gilgamesh in the beginning, I'm

0:25:36.600 --> 0:25:41.080
<v Speaker 1>like now calling back to it is that a big

0:25:41.119 --> 0:25:44.760
<v Speaker 1>part of the story is about the quest for immortality.

0:25:45.240 --> 0:25:49.280
<v Speaker 1>So King Gilgamesh's best friend dies and in response, Gilgamesh

0:25:49.400 --> 0:25:54.760
<v Speaker 1>vows to find eternal life. Spoilers he does not. And

0:25:55.080 --> 0:25:57.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure between the two of us we can think

0:25:57.520 --> 0:26:01.359
<v Speaker 1>of dozens and dozens more books or movies or poems

0:26:01.480 --> 0:26:05.880
<v Speaker 1>or songs about the search for eternal life. But it's

0:26:05.920 --> 0:26:08.560
<v Speaker 1>not just like one of my favorite books growing up.

0:26:08.640 --> 0:26:14.639
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk Everlasting and for a long time you have

0:26:14.720 --> 0:26:15.680
<v Speaker 1>you read talk ever Lasting?

0:26:15.720 --> 0:26:18.119
<v Speaker 2>Rush. I didn't even know it was a book. I

0:26:18.960 --> 0:26:21.359
<v Speaker 2>thought it was a movie, but I've never seen.

0:26:21.119 --> 0:26:25.280
<v Speaker 1>It, okay, or read it. Basically, it's about this family

0:26:25.440 --> 0:26:28.400
<v Speaker 1>that is trying to find like a home. They're like homesteading,

0:26:28.480 --> 0:26:31.400
<v Speaker 1>and they stumble across this water. They all drink from it,

0:26:31.840 --> 0:26:35.000
<v Speaker 1>including the horse, I think, and it happens to be

0:26:35.320 --> 0:26:37.359
<v Speaker 1>like an immortality.

0:26:38.200 --> 0:26:38.640
<v Speaker 2>Spring.

0:26:39.840 --> 0:26:43.320
<v Speaker 1>And then then there's like a girl who stumbles across

0:26:43.320 --> 0:26:45.280
<v Speaker 1>his family and then she's like, do I drink it?

0:26:45.359 --> 0:26:47.520
<v Speaker 1>Do I? Not drink it, blah blah blah, And as

0:26:47.520 --> 0:26:50.000
<v Speaker 1>a kid, I was like, drink it, obviously.

0:26:49.840 --> 0:26:51.960
<v Speaker 2>Drink ever, don't drink it.

0:26:52.760 --> 0:26:58.479
<v Speaker 1>And yeah, anyway, but it's a really interesting contemplation about

0:26:58.800 --> 0:27:03.399
<v Speaker 1>immortality and and life. I loved it. And that's just

0:27:03.480 --> 0:27:09.280
<v Speaker 1>one of like hundreds, dozens, thousands, an unbelievable number. But

0:27:09.359 --> 0:27:12.159
<v Speaker 1>it's not just in these fictional stories that people have

0:27:12.280 --> 0:27:14.719
<v Speaker 1>been on the hunt for a way to live forever.

0:27:15.160 --> 0:27:18.560
<v Speaker 1>The quest for immortality is a very real thing that

0:27:18.640 --> 0:27:21.840
<v Speaker 1>takes many different forms, and I want to talk a

0:27:21.880 --> 0:27:25.119
<v Speaker 1>bit about these forms before focusing on a couple that

0:27:25.160 --> 0:27:29.439
<v Speaker 1>are more in line with this episode. While researching for

0:27:29.480 --> 0:27:33.280
<v Speaker 1>this episode, I came across a book titled Immortality, The

0:27:33.359 --> 0:27:37.040
<v Speaker 1>Quest to Live Forever and How It Drives Civilization. And

0:27:37.240 --> 0:27:40.919
<v Speaker 1>in this book, the author philosopher Stephen Cave, groups the

0:27:40.960 --> 0:27:45.000
<v Speaker 1>search for immortality into four different themes. The first two

0:27:45.359 --> 0:27:49.360
<v Speaker 1>deal with the physical side of things. First, there's living forever,

0:27:50.280 --> 0:27:54.719
<v Speaker 1>you as an individual, stopping aging or aging but not dying,

0:27:55.200 --> 0:28:00.159
<v Speaker 1>living indefinitely. And then there's resurrection, being brought back to

0:28:00.240 --> 0:28:05.280
<v Speaker 1>life after death, think Jesus. Third is the soul, the

0:28:05.400 --> 0:28:08.120
<v Speaker 1>idea that a part of you, but not the physical

0:28:08.200 --> 0:28:12.520
<v Speaker 1>you lives on after you die. And finally, there's legacy,

0:28:12.840 --> 0:28:16.120
<v Speaker 1>which can mean living on through memories or fame, as

0:28:16.119 --> 0:28:18.320
<v Speaker 1>in your only truly dead when your name is no

0:28:18.400 --> 0:28:25.040
<v Speaker 1>longer said Coco, or also offspring the idea that your

0:28:25.080 --> 0:28:29.240
<v Speaker 1>genes achieve immortality by being passed on. And I wanted

0:28:29.280 --> 0:28:31.919
<v Speaker 1>to explore some of the ways we've sought to achieve

0:28:32.000 --> 0:28:36.440
<v Speaker 1>immortality throughout human history, focusing on those that fall into

0:28:36.520 --> 0:28:39.840
<v Speaker 1>the first two of these themes, staying alive and resurrection,

0:28:40.840 --> 0:28:44.800
<v Speaker 1>because in terms of targets for biological research into immortality,

0:28:45.200 --> 0:28:48.440
<v Speaker 1>all of those projects can be lumped into those themes. Yeah,

0:28:49.120 --> 0:28:52.560
<v Speaker 1>And after going through some of these adventures and immortality,

0:28:53.040 --> 0:28:56.280
<v Speaker 1>I want to end by reflecting on what these stories

0:28:56.320 --> 0:29:01.760
<v Speaker 1>tell us about human nature. Here. Humans may be unique

0:29:01.960 --> 0:29:06.719
<v Speaker 1>in our ability to recognize our own mortality that one day,

0:29:07.040 --> 0:29:11.320
<v Speaker 1>each and every one of us will die, and the

0:29:11.440 --> 0:29:16.760
<v Speaker 1>knowledge of our own inevitable death, Yet the simultaneous inability

0:29:16.920 --> 0:29:21.200
<v Speaker 1>to actually imagine what it will be like has driven

0:29:21.280 --> 0:29:25.080
<v Speaker 1>us to find any way around it, either by delaying it,

0:29:25.560 --> 0:29:30.640
<v Speaker 1>undoing it, or preventing it entirely. In ancient Egypt, there

0:29:30.680 --> 0:29:34.120
<v Speaker 1>was an entire industry devoted to preserving the body after

0:29:34.160 --> 0:29:37.600
<v Speaker 1>death so it could be magically revived, and of course,

0:29:37.680 --> 0:29:40.760
<v Speaker 1>pyramids and other monuments were built as a testament to

0:29:40.800 --> 0:29:46.800
<v Speaker 1>the person's life immortality through legacy. Ancient papyri describe not

0:29:47.080 --> 0:29:51.880
<v Speaker 1>just preparation for the afterlife or resurrection, but also ointments

0:29:52.040 --> 0:29:55.560
<v Speaker 1>and elixirs that were meant to extend life and slow aging.

0:29:56.760 --> 0:29:59.080
<v Speaker 1>The search for an elixir of life or a fountain

0:29:59.120 --> 0:30:03.400
<v Speaker 1>of youth is similarly old. There are countless stories of

0:30:03.480 --> 0:30:07.240
<v Speaker 1>emperors and kings searching in vain for a way to

0:30:07.360 --> 0:30:11.480
<v Speaker 1>escape death, like the first Emperor of China, who lived

0:30:11.480 --> 0:30:15.720
<v Speaker 1>around the two hundreds BCE. He became obsessed with the

0:30:15.760 --> 0:30:19.640
<v Speaker 1>idea of living forever and searched high and low for

0:30:19.720 --> 0:30:22.840
<v Speaker 1>someone who could reveal the secret to him. He did

0:30:22.840 --> 0:30:27.080
<v Speaker 1>find someone, probably one of the oldest known swindlers, who

0:30:27.320 --> 0:30:31.040
<v Speaker 1>promised it all but delivered nothing and just ran away

0:30:31.080 --> 0:30:35.000
<v Speaker 1>with his reward. Of course, ultimately the emperor died young,

0:30:35.680 --> 0:30:40.040
<v Speaker 1>only forty nine, likely from either arsenic or lead or

0:30:40.080 --> 0:30:43.760
<v Speaker 1>mercury poisoning, all of which were likely ingredients in his

0:30:43.880 --> 0:30:46.280
<v Speaker 1>daily life. Extending vitamins.

0:30:46.440 --> 0:30:48.840
<v Speaker 2>Oh gosh, that's just such a Bomber.

0:30:49.160 --> 0:30:52.760
<v Speaker 1>I know, but he did achieve immortality. And what I mean,

0:30:52.800 --> 0:30:56.760
<v Speaker 1>we're still talking about him. We are through his through legacy.

0:30:56.840 --> 0:31:00.320
<v Speaker 1>He the terra Cotta Army. Have you heard of the Terracota? Yeah, yep,

0:31:00.560 --> 0:31:01.040
<v Speaker 1>that's him.

0:31:01.200 --> 0:31:02.960
<v Speaker 2>That's him. Huh, all right.

0:31:04.120 --> 0:31:07.320
<v Speaker 1>The elixir of life wasn't always viewed as just a

0:31:07.400 --> 0:31:11.320
<v Speaker 1>potion or something you ingest. At various points, it was

0:31:11.360 --> 0:31:14.360
<v Speaker 1>thought to be a plant, or a series of exercises,

0:31:14.680 --> 0:31:18.280
<v Speaker 1>or a special object like the Philosopher's stone, which was

0:31:18.360 --> 0:31:22.840
<v Speaker 1>one of the mythical substances famous in alchemy. Alchemy was

0:31:22.880 --> 0:31:27.000
<v Speaker 1>a kind of prescience practiced by philosophers and early chemists,

0:31:27.440 --> 0:31:30.400
<v Speaker 1>the goal of which was to transform one metal into another,

0:31:30.560 --> 0:31:34.959
<v Speaker 1>typically gold, and to find the elixir of immortality or

0:31:35.000 --> 0:31:38.640
<v Speaker 1>a cure all for any disease. It was practiced all

0:31:38.680 --> 0:31:42.800
<v Speaker 1>over the world from ancient times all the way up

0:31:42.840 --> 0:31:46.160
<v Speaker 1>through the eighteenth century, when it declined after the rise

0:31:46.200 --> 0:31:50.040
<v Speaker 1>of more rigorous scientific thinking, although it might be more

0:31:50.080 --> 0:31:53.120
<v Speaker 1>accurate to say that alchemy didn't decline, but rather it

0:31:53.160 --> 0:31:57.960
<v Speaker 1>was repackaged primarily into the field of chemistry. Nor did

0:31:57.960 --> 0:32:02.640
<v Speaker 1>people grow tired of looking for the elae of immortality. Instead,

0:32:02.880 --> 0:32:06.640
<v Speaker 1>the development of each new field or new scientific discovery

0:32:07.120 --> 0:32:12.440
<v Speaker 1>was applied to that quest, For instance, electricity. So if

0:32:12.440 --> 0:32:15.880
<v Speaker 1>you think back to our electricity episode, you may remember

0:32:15.960 --> 0:32:19.000
<v Speaker 1>me telling the story of Galvani and his metal wires

0:32:19.040 --> 0:32:23.320
<v Speaker 1>and the frog's legs jumping. So his nephew took a

0:32:23.360 --> 0:32:27.360
<v Speaker 1>page out of his book and held public demonstrations where

0:32:27.400 --> 0:32:31.560
<v Speaker 1>he reanimated corpses of freshly hanged murderers.

0:32:31.720 --> 0:32:35.680
<v Speaker 2>Oh my, okay, yeah.

0:32:35.000 --> 0:32:38.160
<v Speaker 1>And his demonstrations may have been the inspiration for Mary

0:32:38.200 --> 0:32:39.640
<v Speaker 1>Shelley's Frankenstein.

0:32:39.800 --> 0:32:42.120
<v Speaker 2>Oh my goodness.

0:32:41.720 --> 0:32:47.400
<v Speaker 1>I know connections, and this pattern continues to be repeated.

0:32:48.120 --> 0:32:51.960
<v Speaker 1>In the mid twentieth century, advancements in cellular technology allowed

0:32:52.000 --> 0:32:56.840
<v Speaker 1>researchers to use previously frozen sperm for insemination, resulting in

0:32:56.880 --> 0:33:01.960
<v Speaker 1>three pregnancies, which was revolutionary and that soon turned into

0:33:02.160 --> 0:33:06.880
<v Speaker 1>whole body freezing plans. As we've learned more about genes

0:33:06.920 --> 0:33:12.880
<v Speaker 1>linked to aging thanks to genomic sequencing technologies, those inevitably

0:33:12.960 --> 0:33:17.720
<v Speaker 1>became our targets for modern day immortality projects. And the

0:33:17.840 --> 0:33:22.400
<v Speaker 1>amazing thing in my eyes is that despite humanity's continuous

0:33:22.520 --> 0:33:27.440
<v Speaker 1>and innumerable attempts to achieve immortality, over thousands and thousands

0:33:27.520 --> 0:33:32.920
<v Speaker 1>of years, we have not been remotely successful, and we

0:33:33.120 --> 0:33:36.600
<v Speaker 1>probably never will be. Maybe it'll change my mind.

0:33:36.960 --> 0:33:38.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, we'll see erin.

0:33:39.480 --> 0:33:42.680
<v Speaker 1>Over the past couple hundred years or so, the average

0:33:42.720 --> 0:33:46.680
<v Speaker 1>age a person can expect to reach has been greatly extended,

0:33:47.120 --> 0:33:52.120
<v Speaker 1>largely due to vaccines, antibiotics, and many other small things,

0:33:53.040 --> 0:33:57.280
<v Speaker 1>especially a better understanding of disease overall. But this has

0:33:57.360 --> 0:34:01.680
<v Speaker 1>not been an extension of our inherent life span. Humans

0:34:01.720 --> 0:34:04.480
<v Speaker 1>have been able to live to eighty years old ninety

0:34:04.560 --> 0:34:09.479
<v Speaker 1>years old for thousands of years, but were prevented from

0:34:09.640 --> 0:34:15.280
<v Speaker 1>commonly achieving old age because of extrinsic factors like insert

0:34:15.400 --> 0:34:17.680
<v Speaker 1>any vaccine preventable disease here.

0:34:18.640 --> 0:34:22.600
<v Speaker 2>We're also taking like mercury and arsenic as a as

0:34:22.600 --> 0:34:24.200
<v Speaker 2>a vitamin, just like that too.

0:34:25.840 --> 0:34:29.520
<v Speaker 1>But from what I've read, there's not a single anti

0:34:29.640 --> 0:34:34.480
<v Speaker 1>aging serum, pill, potion, whatever that has been shown to

0:34:34.680 --> 0:34:39.799
<v Speaker 1>actually slow aging or reverse or stop it. There is

0:34:39.840 --> 0:34:42.799
<v Speaker 1>some evidence that diet and exercise may play a role.

0:34:43.680 --> 0:34:48.440
<v Speaker 1>Longevity and aging are both such incredibly multifaceted processes that

0:34:48.480 --> 0:34:53.160
<v Speaker 1>are nearly impossible to predict, and I'm not saying at

0:34:53.200 --> 0:34:55.600
<v Speaker 1>all that I don't think this research should be done.

0:34:55.920 --> 0:34:58.839
<v Speaker 1>Some of these projects have uncovered knowledge that has had

0:34:59.000 --> 0:35:02.760
<v Speaker 1>huge implications, who are improving quality of life and treating

0:35:02.800 --> 0:35:07.200
<v Speaker 1>diseases that primarily manifest later in life. I guess I'm

0:35:07.320 --> 0:35:11.359
<v Speaker 1>just expressing my skepticism that a meaningful extension of both

0:35:11.480 --> 0:35:15.040
<v Speaker 1>lifespan and quality of life alongside that will be achieved

0:35:15.080 --> 0:35:19.480
<v Speaker 1>in the near or even kind of near future. The

0:35:19.560 --> 0:35:26.000
<v Speaker 1>section definitely came out differently than I had planned when

0:35:26.040 --> 0:35:28.279
<v Speaker 1>I started it. I thought I'd take us through the

0:35:28.320 --> 0:35:30.640
<v Speaker 1>history of the search for the elixir of life or

0:35:30.680 --> 0:35:35.719
<v Speaker 1>the beginnings of cryonics, and those stories are fascinating and

0:35:35.920 --> 0:35:40.600
<v Speaker 1>worth telling. But I think that overwhelmingly while doing the

0:35:40.640 --> 0:35:44.000
<v Speaker 1>research for this part, and while going through it just now,

0:35:44.080 --> 0:35:46.920
<v Speaker 1>I think that what sticks out to me most is

0:35:47.520 --> 0:35:52.879
<v Speaker 1>how so many things have not changed. We will continue

0:35:53.320 --> 0:35:56.360
<v Speaker 1>to keep looking for ways to live forever, to upload

0:35:56.400 --> 0:36:00.719
<v Speaker 1>our brains or slow our aging, to reanimate form and bodies,

0:36:00.880 --> 0:36:04.440
<v Speaker 1>or download our memories into a cloned body, and if

0:36:04.480 --> 0:36:07.600
<v Speaker 1>any of those technologies are successful, you can also be

0:36:07.680 --> 0:36:11.080
<v Speaker 1>sure that the select few, the richest, and most powerful

0:36:11.400 --> 0:36:15.000
<v Speaker 1>will be the only ones to benefit from them, which

0:36:15.040 --> 0:36:19.200
<v Speaker 1>is also how it has been throughout history. But would

0:36:19.239 --> 0:36:22.680
<v Speaker 1>it truly be a benefit to live forever? Would it

0:36:22.760 --> 0:36:26.600
<v Speaker 1>be something you want? I've talked about a few stories

0:36:26.680 --> 0:36:29.480
<v Speaker 1>about people who have searched for a way to live forever.

0:36:29.960 --> 0:36:33.560
<v Speaker 1>Now let's think of some where they achieved immortality. How

0:36:33.600 --> 0:36:35.000
<v Speaker 1>did those stories end?

0:36:35.760 --> 0:36:36.680
<v Speaker 2>Never well?

0:36:37.200 --> 0:36:44.000
<v Speaker 1>Never well? Almost universally, they end in profound loneliness, sadness,

0:36:44.120 --> 0:36:48.600
<v Speaker 1>and regret. Not at first maybe, but over time, as

0:36:48.600 --> 0:36:52.000
<v Speaker 1>their mortal friends and family grow older and die, as

0:36:52.080 --> 0:36:57.080
<v Speaker 1>days pass and time becomes meaningless. Granted, all of those

0:36:57.080 --> 0:37:00.919
<v Speaker 1>stories have been imagined by mortal humans. These endings are

0:37:00.960 --> 0:37:04.880
<v Speaker 1>just consolation for not being able to live forever. But

0:37:05.880 --> 0:37:08.919
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. Personally, I don't think so. I think

0:37:09.040 --> 0:37:11.840
<v Speaker 1>too often we decide we want to live forever without

0:37:11.960 --> 0:37:15.680
<v Speaker 1>considering what that could truly look like. I want to

0:37:15.800 --> 0:37:18.319
<v Speaker 1>end this section with a quote by Stephen Cave that

0:37:18.360 --> 0:37:23.000
<v Speaker 1>I think puts it nicely. Quote The deep problem is this,

0:37:23.640 --> 0:37:26.319
<v Speaker 1>The value of a thing is related to its scarcity.

0:37:26.920 --> 0:37:30.560
<v Speaker 1>People conscious of their mortality value their time and aim

0:37:30.640 --> 0:37:33.560
<v Speaker 1>to spend it wisely because they know their days are numbered.

0:37:34.120 --> 0:37:37.520
<v Speaker 1>But if our days were not numbered, this incentive would disappear.

0:37:38.080 --> 0:37:41.959
<v Speaker 1>Given infinity, time would lose its worth, and once time

0:37:42.040 --> 0:37:45.759
<v Speaker 1>is worthless it becomes impossible to make rational decisions about

0:37:45.760 --> 0:37:48.680
<v Speaker 1>how to spend it. The consequences of this for an

0:37:48.680 --> 0:37:52.920
<v Speaker 1>individual would be bad enough. For a civilization of such ditherers,

0:37:53.080 --> 0:37:54.480
<v Speaker 1>it would be disastrous.

0:37:56.800 --> 0:37:57.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:37:57.920 --> 0:38:01.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And with that, Aaron, oh gosh, I'll turn it

0:38:01.520 --> 0:38:03.640
<v Speaker 1>over to you to tell me how close we are

0:38:03.760 --> 0:38:05.080
<v Speaker 1>to such consequences.

0:38:05.560 --> 0:38:09.240
<v Speaker 2>Oh my goodness, Arin, this episode turned out so different

0:38:09.239 --> 0:38:13.600
<v Speaker 2>than we expected. I'm going to need a break, okay, Yeah,

0:38:13.640 --> 0:38:41.799
<v Speaker 2>and then I'll dive in to what's happening today. So

0:38:41.880 --> 0:38:46.400
<v Speaker 2>when I first started trying to research for this episode,

0:38:46.560 --> 0:38:49.800
<v Speaker 2>I had a really hard time because I wasn't sure

0:38:50.400 --> 0:38:54.400
<v Speaker 2>how to really approach this question. And I actually wasn't

0:38:54.440 --> 0:38:59.759
<v Speaker 2>sure what my question was. I normally do the biology

0:38:59.800 --> 0:39:04.440
<v Speaker 2>sect of whatever disease or thing we're talking about, and

0:39:04.480 --> 0:39:06.799
<v Speaker 2>then I talk about the current status. Where do we

0:39:06.840 --> 0:39:12.000
<v Speaker 2>stand today? So what was my question for immortality? Is it?

0:39:12.360 --> 0:39:15.840
<v Speaker 2>How close are we to immortality? Is it? Are we

0:39:15.920 --> 0:39:19.120
<v Speaker 2>still pursuing this quest? Which spoilers you already told us

0:39:19.160 --> 0:39:22.719
<v Speaker 2>And the answer is yes, we still are. Oh was

0:39:22.800 --> 0:39:26.160
<v Speaker 2>the question have we learned anything from these thousands of

0:39:26.239 --> 0:39:31.680
<v Speaker 2>years of futility so far? I don't know what question

0:39:31.800 --> 0:39:35.359
<v Speaker 2>I'm answering out of those. But I did a lot

0:39:35.360 --> 0:39:39.919
<v Speaker 2>of reading, and I read a lot about the various

0:39:40.040 --> 0:39:45.360
<v Speaker 2>you know, Silicon Valley startups that exist, the number of companies,

0:39:45.560 --> 0:39:49.160
<v Speaker 2>the number of billionaires and millionaires, and the amount of

0:39:49.200 --> 0:39:51.640
<v Speaker 2>dollars that are going in to try to solve this

0:39:52.080 --> 0:39:56.520
<v Speaker 2>quote problem of aging or the problem of death.

0:39:57.000 --> 0:40:02.400
<v Speaker 1>It kills me, the problem of aging, or it's really

0:40:02.440 --> 0:40:07.600
<v Speaker 1>really interesting, and I think I got a little.

0:40:07.400 --> 0:40:11.120
<v Speaker 2>Bit overwhelmed and also maybe a little cynical by the

0:40:11.280 --> 0:40:11.759
<v Speaker 2>end of it.

0:40:12.280 --> 0:40:14.279
<v Speaker 1>Oh, for sure, I got cynical by the end of

0:40:14.320 --> 0:40:14.560
<v Speaker 1>the day.

0:40:14.719 --> 0:40:17.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. But it's not to say, like what you said, Erin,

0:40:17.280 --> 0:40:19.960
<v Speaker 2>It's not that what any of these researchers are doing

0:40:20.120 --> 0:40:26.600
<v Speaker 2>is unimpressive or unimportant. It's just that we remain in

0:40:26.640 --> 0:40:31.719
<v Speaker 2>the very early stages of this research. So let's kind

0:40:31.719 --> 0:40:33.800
<v Speaker 2>of go through the way that I at least tried

0:40:33.880 --> 0:40:39.600
<v Speaker 2>to frame thinking about this. If we're talking about immortality,

0:40:39.800 --> 0:40:42.640
<v Speaker 2>like you said Erin at the top, then we're kind

0:40:42.680 --> 0:40:46.879
<v Speaker 2>of talking about the idea of anti aging, or we're

0:40:46.920 --> 0:40:52.200
<v Speaker 2>talking about increasing our lifespan. And if we're talking about

0:40:52.239 --> 0:40:56.880
<v Speaker 2>halting aging to the point of halting death, then for me,

0:40:57.280 --> 0:40:59.400
<v Speaker 2>the way to get there, logically is to answer a

0:40:59.440 --> 0:41:04.239
<v Speaker 2>series of four different questions. The first question you kind

0:41:04.280 --> 0:41:07.720
<v Speaker 2>of answered, Aaron, and that is why do we age?

0:41:08.640 --> 0:41:11.520
<v Speaker 2>I think that you provided a lot of evolutionary perspective

0:41:11.600 --> 0:41:15.120
<v Speaker 2>on the idea of why we as humans and we

0:41:15.320 --> 0:41:21.120
<v Speaker 2>as living organisms on the planet Earth age evolutionarily, but

0:41:21.560 --> 0:41:24.719
<v Speaker 2>we still don't fully necessarily know. We at least have

0:41:24.760 --> 0:41:29.240
<v Speaker 2>a lot of hypotheses. But a very closely related question

0:41:29.719 --> 0:41:33.280
<v Speaker 2>to why do we age is how do we age?

0:41:33.840 --> 0:41:38.520
<v Speaker 2>Like fundamentally, what governs the process of how our selves siness?

0:41:39.040 --> 0:41:43.320
<v Speaker 2>And how is this process related to those evolutionary reasons

0:41:43.360 --> 0:41:46.959
<v Speaker 2>of why we age? Because if we could answer those

0:41:47.000 --> 0:41:50.680
<v Speaker 2>two questions really well, then we could ask the next question,

0:41:51.520 --> 0:41:56.839
<v Speaker 2>must we age? Are those processes, like we said, from

0:41:56.840 --> 0:42:02.879
<v Speaker 2>an evolutionary perspective, necessary for life? And are they immutable?

0:42:04.040 --> 0:42:07.920
<v Speaker 2>And if the answer to that question is no, they're

0:42:07.920 --> 0:42:12.160
<v Speaker 2>not immutable. And if we can figure that out by

0:42:12.239 --> 0:42:15.080
<v Speaker 2>virtue of figuring out the answers to the first two questions,

0:42:16.000 --> 0:42:19.520
<v Speaker 2>then we can ask the final question, if we don't

0:42:19.960 --> 0:42:25.600
<v Speaker 2>have to age, do we have to die? So, at

0:42:25.680 --> 0:42:29.360
<v Speaker 2>least to me, those seem like the four fundamental questions

0:42:29.360 --> 0:42:32.200
<v Speaker 2>that have to be answered if we have any hope

0:42:32.239 --> 0:42:38.200
<v Speaker 2>of answering this riddle of immortality. And suffice to say,

0:42:38.320 --> 0:42:43.080
<v Speaker 2>those four questions are massive, and I think the biggest

0:42:43.120 --> 0:42:46.839
<v Speaker 2>issue for me in talking specifically about immortality is the

0:42:46.960 --> 0:42:51.640
<v Speaker 2>leap between those last two questions, must we age and

0:42:51.920 --> 0:42:56.720
<v Speaker 2>must we die? Right? Because while there are in nature

0:42:56.760 --> 0:43:00.480
<v Speaker 2>and in the laboratory many many examples be they plant

0:43:00.560 --> 0:43:04.400
<v Speaker 2>or worm or lobster that live a very long time

0:43:04.560 --> 0:43:10.839
<v Speaker 2>that seem to be immortal, nothing is invincible, right, right.

0:43:11.200 --> 0:43:14.440
<v Speaker 2>If you take one of these invincible planarians out of

0:43:14.480 --> 0:43:17.879
<v Speaker 2>their worm juices, they're going to die. They're not invincible.

0:43:19.360 --> 0:43:21.800
<v Speaker 2>And so that's I think one of the biggest issues

0:43:21.840 --> 0:43:27.000
<v Speaker 2>I see with even just entertaining this idea of true immortality.

0:43:27.400 --> 0:43:31.440
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, right, immortality is not invincibility exactly.

0:43:31.800 --> 0:43:37.319
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, okay, But so is that what people are working on.

0:43:37.480 --> 0:43:41.640
<v Speaker 2>Are people working on immortality or are people really working

0:43:41.840 --> 0:43:45.359
<v Speaker 2>on the first few questions but selling it packaging it

0:43:45.440 --> 0:43:51.480
<v Speaker 2>as the idea of immortality. Maybe that's more accurate. So

0:43:52.000 --> 0:43:56.799
<v Speaker 2>what do we actually know about these first couple of questions,

0:43:56.960 --> 0:44:03.960
<v Speaker 2>especially how we age and must we age? There has

0:44:04.040 --> 0:44:07.799
<v Speaker 2>been like you said, Aaron, without a doubt huge increases

0:44:07.880 --> 0:44:11.600
<v Speaker 2>in the estimated life expectancy for humans globally, and there

0:44:11.680 --> 0:44:16.279
<v Speaker 2>is a lot of variation in estimated life expectancy between countries,

0:44:16.360 --> 0:44:20.839
<v Speaker 2>between genders, et cetera. And most of that increase is,

0:44:20.960 --> 0:44:27.640
<v Speaker 2>like you mentioned, credited to early life advancements, things like antibiotics, vaccines. Basically,

0:44:27.800 --> 0:44:30.880
<v Speaker 2>we know for sure that we've had huge reductions in

0:44:31.120 --> 0:44:35.960
<v Speaker 2>early life mortality because of scientific and biomedical achievements over

0:44:35.960 --> 0:44:40.400
<v Speaker 2>the last fifty twoe hundred years. However, there has also

0:44:40.480 --> 0:44:44.240
<v Speaker 2>been a decline in late life mortality. So the fraction

0:44:44.520 --> 0:44:47.759
<v Speaker 2>of each birth cohort that reaches old age has been

0:44:47.800 --> 0:44:53.080
<v Speaker 2>increasing year after year, or at least it had been

0:44:53.760 --> 0:44:57.320
<v Speaker 2>until about the nineteen eighties, and since then it's actually

0:44:57.360 --> 0:45:04.160
<v Speaker 2>been very stagnant despite increasing overall life expectancy, but the

0:45:04.200 --> 0:45:09.560
<v Speaker 2>maximum reported age at death has plateaued. You may have

0:45:09.680 --> 0:45:13.520
<v Speaker 2>heard of Jean Calmeat, who was a French woman who

0:45:13.560 --> 0:45:16.799
<v Speaker 2>died in nineteen ninety seven at the ripe age of

0:45:16.920 --> 0:45:20.840
<v Speaker 2>one hundred, twenty two years and five months. She still

0:45:20.880 --> 0:45:24.640
<v Speaker 2>holds the verified longevity record by a lot, by a

0:45:24.680 --> 0:45:29.680
<v Speaker 2>couple of years. And while there are over five hundred

0:45:29.760 --> 0:45:34.280
<v Speaker 2>thousand centenarians alive worldwide, at least that's what the UN

0:45:34.440 --> 0:45:39.399
<v Speaker 2>estimated in twenty twenty wow, five hundred thousand people over

0:45:39.440 --> 0:45:43.240
<v Speaker 2>one hundred. That number is twenty times higher than fifty

0:45:43.320 --> 0:45:48.040
<v Speaker 2>years prior. But the average age at death for these

0:45:48.080 --> 0:45:53.759
<v Speaker 2>centenarians has not increased since nineteen sixty eight. So there

0:45:53.880 --> 0:45:58.200
<v Speaker 2>is a lot of research and mathematical modeling like you

0:45:58.239 --> 0:46:01.759
<v Speaker 2>mentioned erin as far back as the eighteen hundreds, that

0:46:01.840 --> 0:46:04.800
<v Speaker 2>really suggest that there may be a true upper limit

0:46:04.920 --> 0:46:10.279
<v Speaker 2>to the human life span. And while this idea is

0:46:10.440 --> 0:46:14.280
<v Speaker 2>still a little bit controversial, there are people who don't

0:46:14.360 --> 0:46:16.680
<v Speaker 2>like to agree with the idea that there is a

0:46:17.320 --> 0:46:20.960
<v Speaker 2>limit to human life expectancy. A lot of studies that

0:46:21.040 --> 0:46:26.080
<v Speaker 2>have used various methods and are to varying degrees controversial,

0:46:26.400 --> 0:46:29.920
<v Speaker 2>have converged around this idea that perhaps between one hundred

0:46:29.920 --> 0:46:32.040
<v Speaker 2>and twenty and one hundred and fifty years might be

0:46:32.120 --> 0:46:39.560
<v Speaker 2>the maximum human lifespan that one could expect. So could

0:46:39.600 --> 0:46:46.480
<v Speaker 2>we even live forever? It seems highly unlikely. Yeah, But

0:46:46.560 --> 0:46:51.960
<v Speaker 2>there is another piece to this puzzle besides actual lifespan is,

0:46:52.000 --> 0:46:55.400
<v Speaker 2>like you mentioned Aaron, quality of life. This is often

0:46:55.440 --> 0:47:00.040
<v Speaker 2>called health span. So if life span is the length

0:47:00.160 --> 0:47:03.520
<v Speaker 2>of your life. Health Span is often defined as the

0:47:03.560 --> 0:47:07.600
<v Speaker 2>period of your life that is free from disease. I

0:47:07.760 --> 0:47:12.720
<v Speaker 2>personally will take slight issue with this definition, because health

0:47:12.800 --> 0:47:15.440
<v Speaker 2>is of course a lot more than merely the absence

0:47:15.480 --> 0:47:20.080
<v Speaker 2>of disease, but this is generally how health span is defined,

0:47:20.200 --> 0:47:23.400
<v Speaker 2>so we'll go with it for the purposes of this episode. Okay,

0:47:24.239 --> 0:47:28.600
<v Speaker 2>And if we look worldwide, despite how much lifespan has increased,

0:47:29.080 --> 0:47:33.879
<v Speaker 2>chronic diseases are the leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide,

0:47:33.960 --> 0:47:39.359
<v Speaker 2>and many of these cardiovascular disease, cancer, dementia. These are

0:47:39.400 --> 0:47:44.759
<v Speaker 2>often considered diseases of aging, and an estimated fifty eight

0:47:44.880 --> 0:47:49.160
<v Speaker 2>percent of chronic disease related mortality happens in people over

0:47:49.239 --> 0:47:54.920
<v Speaker 2>age seventy. So if we look at the discrepancy between

0:47:55.160 --> 0:47:59.680
<v Speaker 2>health span and lifespan, there's an estimated gap right now

0:47:59.760 --> 0:48:03.879
<v Speaker 2>in the world of nine years. So there's a nine

0:48:04.000 --> 0:48:07.080
<v Speaker 2>year gap where you are still alive, but you are

0:48:07.120 --> 0:48:13.080
<v Speaker 2>no longer quote free from disease. And a lot of

0:48:13.080 --> 0:48:18.320
<v Speaker 2>the field of what is called gerontology research isn't truly

0:48:18.440 --> 0:48:21.719
<v Speaker 2>focused on the idea of immortality, at least not overtly

0:48:22.760 --> 0:48:25.239
<v Speaker 2>or in a lot of cases, they're not even focused

0:48:25.360 --> 0:48:29.560
<v Speaker 2>on the idea of increasing our lifespan, but rather they're

0:48:29.560 --> 0:48:34.040
<v Speaker 2>focused on increasing health span. So they talk instead about

0:48:34.080 --> 0:48:38.480
<v Speaker 2>the idea of compressing our morbidity to the end of life,

0:48:38.560 --> 0:48:42.160
<v Speaker 2>such that we live healthier lives for longer and can

0:48:42.239 --> 0:48:45.760
<v Speaker 2>either avoid or prolong the onset of these various age

0:48:45.800 --> 0:48:49.880
<v Speaker 2>related diseases. And this I think sits as both a

0:48:49.960 --> 0:48:55.120
<v Speaker 2>more palatable goal. For sure, I would agree with that,

0:48:55.640 --> 0:48:58.920
<v Speaker 2>but I also think that it's closer to what seems

0:48:59.200 --> 0:49:03.719
<v Speaker 2>maybe yes, although I do stress that we're not there yet.

0:49:05.200 --> 0:49:09.080
<v Speaker 1>It's it's so interesting because I think that, like, given

0:49:09.160 --> 0:49:12.080
<v Speaker 1>the past one hundred and fifty years of scientific research,

0:49:12.200 --> 0:49:16.520
<v Speaker 1>we tend to view things as science will always progress

0:49:16.640 --> 0:49:20.920
<v Speaker 1>at an increasing rate. Yeah, right, like we make bigger

0:49:21.040 --> 0:49:24.440
<v Speaker 1>leaps and bounds in our understanding and in our technology

0:49:24.480 --> 0:49:30.720
<v Speaker 1>and so on, and it doesn't. That's not necessarily the case,

0:49:30.920 --> 0:49:32.600
<v Speaker 1>I think with every field.

0:49:33.000 --> 0:49:36.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it is really really interesting to read a lot

0:49:36.560 --> 0:49:40.080
<v Speaker 2>of this research and then also read the media reports

0:49:40.440 --> 0:49:43.520
<v Speaker 2>about this research or about the companies that are funding this.

0:49:43.480 --> 0:49:46.640
<v Speaker 1>Research, I bet, because.

0:49:46.320 --> 0:49:48.160
<v Speaker 2>It's very different, right.

0:49:48.400 --> 0:49:52.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, This is where reading between the lines of popular

0:49:52.120 --> 0:49:56.920
<v Speaker 1>news articles is tricky. It's tricky, and where there's like

0:49:57.120 --> 0:49:59.640
<v Speaker 1>have a heavy dose of skepticism and go to the

0:49:59.680 --> 0:50:00.480
<v Speaker 1>original text.

0:50:00.680 --> 0:50:05.839
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, definitely, But there are I will say a lot

0:50:05.880 --> 0:50:10.000
<v Speaker 2>of researchers out there that are trying to really get

0:50:10.040 --> 0:50:12.759
<v Speaker 2>into the nitty gritty of answering those first couple of

0:50:12.840 --> 0:50:16.960
<v Speaker 2>questions that I posed, How and why do we age?

0:50:17.000 --> 0:50:23.480
<v Speaker 2>And can we alter this process? So while we don't

0:50:23.480 --> 0:50:25.840
<v Speaker 2>have a single answer, I will link to a couple

0:50:25.880 --> 0:50:29.160
<v Speaker 2>of different papers that go into a lot more detail

0:50:29.360 --> 0:50:33.480
<v Speaker 2>on these mechanisms. But we can define, based on what

0:50:33.560 --> 0:50:38.279
<v Speaker 2>we know so far, about nine different flavors or nine

0:50:38.280 --> 0:50:44.520
<v Speaker 2>different targets that are related to aging and potentially modifiable

0:50:44.719 --> 0:50:49.000
<v Speaker 2>at least in cell culture and or in animal models,

0:50:49.600 --> 0:50:55.920
<v Speaker 2>or maybe just theoretically modifiable. So I'll mention all of these,

0:50:56.640 --> 0:51:00.920
<v Speaker 2>but spoiler alert. Reading some of the papers that go

0:51:01.000 --> 0:51:05.640
<v Speaker 2>into detail on this, I had a very difficult time

0:51:06.719 --> 0:51:10.839
<v Speaker 2>following through. But let's at least look at what we

0:51:11.040 --> 0:51:13.440
<v Speaker 2>know about aging, because it turns out we know a

0:51:13.480 --> 0:51:17.560
<v Speaker 2>lot more than you might think. So when we look

0:51:17.600 --> 0:51:20.920
<v Speaker 2>at the mechanisms of aging, one of them Aaron you

0:51:21.000 --> 0:51:25.200
<v Speaker 2>mentioned already, and that is damage to our DNA be

0:51:25.320 --> 0:51:31.560
<v Speaker 2>that nuclear DNA or mitochondrial DNA. Basically, over time, insults

0:51:31.880 --> 0:51:35.440
<v Speaker 2>to our bodies result in the inability of our bodies

0:51:35.480 --> 0:51:38.560
<v Speaker 2>to properly repair damage to our DNA the way that

0:51:38.640 --> 0:51:41.680
<v Speaker 2>it is supposed to. And there are a lot of

0:51:41.800 --> 0:51:47.040
<v Speaker 2>different potential genes involved in this and specific mechanisms that

0:51:47.120 --> 0:51:51.600
<v Speaker 2>researchers have altered in flies or in worms, or just

0:51:51.680 --> 0:51:56.200
<v Speaker 2>in cells. But essentially this genomic instability does play a

0:51:56.239 --> 0:52:00.120
<v Speaker 2>really big part in the process of aging. So if

0:52:00.120 --> 0:52:03.600
<v Speaker 2>there was a way to make our DNA more easily

0:52:03.640 --> 0:52:06.880
<v Speaker 2>able to repair itself, that could then delay that process

0:52:06.920 --> 0:52:10.359
<v Speaker 2>of aging, and we know delay a lot of the

0:52:10.400 --> 0:52:13.600
<v Speaker 2>age related diseases that are related to this, like cancers,

0:52:14.040 --> 0:52:19.480
<v Speaker 2>like maybe heart disease. There's also telomere damage telomere's I

0:52:19.480 --> 0:52:22.520
<v Speaker 2>think we talked about in our HPV episode. Was that right?

0:52:23.560 --> 0:52:25.920
<v Speaker 1>You talked about it in some episode, but can you

0:52:25.960 --> 0:52:26.759
<v Speaker 1>do a refresher?

0:52:26.840 --> 0:52:30.120
<v Speaker 2>Of course, I'd love to so. Telomere's got a lot

0:52:30.160 --> 0:52:33.239
<v Speaker 2>of press in aging a while back. But basically, they

0:52:33.280 --> 0:52:36.879
<v Speaker 2>are the end caps of our DNA. They are these

0:52:36.920 --> 0:52:39.799
<v Speaker 2>strings of repeat DNA that sit at the ends of

0:52:39.840 --> 0:52:42.760
<v Speaker 2>our chromosomes and in a lot of cases, they don't

0:52:42.800 --> 0:52:46.879
<v Speaker 2>get completely copied over when our cells divide, so over time,

0:52:46.920 --> 0:52:51.440
<v Speaker 2>telomeres can become shortened, and this process of telomere shortening

0:52:51.520 --> 0:52:55.520
<v Speaker 2>or telomere exhaustion then leads to a decline in the

0:52:55.560 --> 0:53:00.759
<v Speaker 2>regenerative capacity of tissues and therefore accelerated aging. So in

0:53:00.960 --> 0:53:04.680
<v Speaker 2>mice models and in other animal studies, telomere length has

0:53:04.719 --> 0:53:09.239
<v Speaker 2>been shown to be associated with lifespan in humans. It's

0:53:09.280 --> 0:53:12.440
<v Speaker 2>not quite that simple, but this is at least another

0:53:12.640 --> 0:53:13.560
<v Speaker 2>potential target.

0:53:14.360 --> 0:53:16.120
<v Speaker 1>What do you mean, it's not quite that simple.

0:53:16.480 --> 0:53:19.480
<v Speaker 2>It's not like the length of your telomeres determines how

0:53:19.520 --> 0:53:21.239
<v Speaker 2>long you're going to live. It's not a one to

0:53:21.320 --> 0:53:24.840
<v Speaker 2>one association. So just adding on to our telomeres doesn't

0:53:24.880 --> 0:53:28.640
<v Speaker 2>necessarily mean that we're going to increase our lifespan or

0:53:28.719 --> 0:53:34.879
<v Speaker 2>our health span, because this is one of nine processes

0:53:34.960 --> 0:53:37.880
<v Speaker 2>related to the aging process, nine that we know of

0:53:37.960 --> 0:53:45.720
<v Speaker 2>so far. Okay, there's more lots and lots of research

0:53:45.800 --> 0:53:48.560
<v Speaker 2>right now, especially by some of these big biotech companies

0:53:48.600 --> 0:53:55.719
<v Speaker 2>into epigenetic modifications. Epigenetics we've only ever briefly mentioned, but

0:53:55.800 --> 0:53:57.759
<v Speaker 2>I actually think I talked a bit about it in

0:53:57.800 --> 0:53:59.759
<v Speaker 2>our full late episode. It's kind of fun.

0:54:00.120 --> 0:54:03.000
<v Speaker 1>I was a thinking that, yeah, yeah.

0:54:02.440 --> 0:54:08.480
<v Speaker 2>But basically, epigenetics are changes to DNA patterns that are

0:54:08.520 --> 0:54:11.920
<v Speaker 2>not within the DNA itself, so not within a gene.

0:54:12.239 --> 0:54:14.799
<v Speaker 2>But it's changes to things like methyl groups that are

0:54:14.840 --> 0:54:19.360
<v Speaker 2>attached to our DNA. It's changes to things like histones,

0:54:19.400 --> 0:54:22.360
<v Speaker 2>which are like the proteins that are DNA wraps itself around.

0:54:22.800 --> 0:54:25.760
<v Speaker 2>It can be changes to how our DNA is stored.

0:54:26.280 --> 0:54:31.439
<v Speaker 2>Any of these changes are considered part of epigenetics, and

0:54:32.200 --> 0:54:35.279
<v Speaker 2>changes in a number of different things from methylation to

0:54:35.400 --> 0:54:39.240
<v Speaker 2>histone proteins have been shown to be associated with aging.

0:54:40.160 --> 0:54:44.759
<v Speaker 2>There is a family of enzymes called sirtuins I think

0:54:44.760 --> 0:54:48.080
<v Speaker 2>that's how you pronounce it, that are involved in DNA

0:54:48.160 --> 0:54:52.080
<v Speaker 2>methylation and got a lot of press because in yeast

0:54:52.239 --> 0:54:57.279
<v Speaker 2>and in worms, when these enzymes are manipulated, then you

0:54:57.400 --> 0:55:04.200
<v Speaker 2>can increase lifespan by significant in a worm. Again in humans,

0:55:04.600 --> 0:55:08.680
<v Speaker 2>we don't have any data to show that as of yet,

0:55:09.400 --> 0:55:12.360
<v Speaker 2>but that's at least the idea that epigenetics likely plays

0:55:12.400 --> 0:55:15.399
<v Speaker 2>a big role in the process of aging. So if

0:55:15.440 --> 0:55:17.920
<v Speaker 2>this is something that we could target, we could maybe

0:55:18.000 --> 0:55:25.120
<v Speaker 2>affect it. Yet another target would be proteastasis, so Basically,

0:55:25.760 --> 0:55:30.400
<v Speaker 2>our cells are both DNA and proteins, right, So as

0:55:30.440 --> 0:55:35.040
<v Speaker 2>we age, our cells become less able to maintain proteins

0:55:35.120 --> 0:55:40.040
<v Speaker 2>in the correct stable configurations and correct functionality. If you

0:55:40.080 --> 0:55:43.640
<v Speaker 2>think of something like Alzheimer's disease, this is largely a

0:55:43.680 --> 0:55:48.040
<v Speaker 2>disease of protein misfolding. So there are a lot of

0:55:48.080 --> 0:55:51.440
<v Speaker 2>studies in cells in yeast, and I think at least

0:55:51.440 --> 0:55:54.400
<v Speaker 2>some in worms and flies that if you mess with

0:55:54.440 --> 0:55:58.319
<v Speaker 2>some of the genes related to protein stability, then you

0:55:58.400 --> 0:56:03.040
<v Speaker 2>can precipitate aging make them age faster. So that suggests

0:56:03.040 --> 0:56:06.440
<v Speaker 2>that these systems are directly involved in the process of aging,

0:56:06.560 --> 0:56:10.200
<v Speaker 2>and thus if they could be manipulated in the opposite way,

0:56:10.320 --> 0:56:14.280
<v Speaker 2>could perhaps promote longevity or reverse aging.

0:56:15.040 --> 0:56:17.280
<v Speaker 1>Reverse aging. Interesting, say, yeah.

0:56:17.480 --> 0:56:22.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, there's more. I'm only on number four of nine.

0:56:22.600 --> 0:56:25.279
<v Speaker 2>I don't have goodness as much detail on all of them.

0:56:25.360 --> 0:56:28.120
<v Speaker 2>Let me tell you. There's also the idea, and I

0:56:28.200 --> 0:56:32.920
<v Speaker 2>think this one has gotten probably the most press very recently,

0:56:33.040 --> 0:56:34.960
<v Speaker 2>or at least maybe just the most press of the

0:56:35.000 --> 0:56:38.799
<v Speaker 2>press that I read. But it's this idea of as

0:56:38.840 --> 0:56:46.200
<v Speaker 2>we age, we have a deregulated ability to do nutrient sensing. Basically,

0:56:46.480 --> 0:56:50.120
<v Speaker 2>our bodies are not able to tell as we age

0:56:50.480 --> 0:56:53.080
<v Speaker 2>if we have an abundance of food or if we

0:56:53.200 --> 0:56:57.880
<v Speaker 2>have not enough food. And this goes along with a

0:56:57.920 --> 0:57:02.080
<v Speaker 2>lot of data in mice and in some primates of

0:57:02.200 --> 0:57:06.640
<v Speaker 2>caloric restriction. So having less food for a portion of

0:57:06.680 --> 0:57:10.480
<v Speaker 2>your life increases lifespan in a lot of animal models.

0:57:11.640 --> 0:57:14.319
<v Speaker 2>So there are a lot of different host factors that

0:57:14.360 --> 0:57:17.560
<v Speaker 2>are implicated as a possibility in this. Some of them

0:57:17.560 --> 0:57:21.360
<v Speaker 2>are things you've definitely heard of, like insulin right or

0:57:21.640 --> 0:57:25.600
<v Speaker 2>IGF one insulin growth factor one. There are a lot

0:57:25.640 --> 0:57:30.240
<v Speaker 2>of others like m tour amp K sirtuins are in

0:57:30.360 --> 0:57:34.640
<v Speaker 2>amp K. These are all various fancy names for factors

0:57:34.680 --> 0:57:37.680
<v Speaker 2>that our body uses to help signal to our brain

0:57:38.120 --> 0:57:41.080
<v Speaker 2>when there is food that needs to be digested versus

0:57:41.160 --> 0:57:44.080
<v Speaker 2>when our nutrients stash is very low, so we need

0:57:44.120 --> 0:57:47.120
<v Speaker 2>to engage in catabolism like break down our own stores

0:57:47.480 --> 0:57:51.120
<v Speaker 2>instead of building a bunch of muscle in fat. So

0:57:51.160 --> 0:57:55.280
<v Speaker 2>there's evidence to suggest that states of anabolic signaling that

0:57:55.440 --> 0:57:57.960
<v Speaker 2>is our body saying, hey, we've got a lot of food,

0:57:58.000 --> 0:58:02.400
<v Speaker 2>we need to build up stores. That process accelerates aging,

0:58:02.720 --> 0:58:07.240
<v Speaker 2>at least in mice and so manipulating this signaling so

0:58:07.280 --> 0:58:11.600
<v Speaker 2>that a mouse's metabolism thinks it's living underlimited nutrients. By

0:58:11.680 --> 0:58:16.560
<v Speaker 2>manipulating some of these factors can extend longevity.

0:58:17.840 --> 0:58:21.640
<v Speaker 1>Interesting, So that's that's what is meant by caloric restriction,

0:58:21.840 --> 0:58:25.080
<v Speaker 1>is manipulating the factors, not straight up chloric restriction.

0:58:25.160 --> 0:58:27.960
<v Speaker 2>So straight up coloric restriction means straight up coloric restriction.

0:58:28.160 --> 0:58:28.520
<v Speaker 1>Okay.

0:58:28.760 --> 0:58:30.720
<v Speaker 2>This is trying to get out a way of can

0:58:30.760 --> 0:58:35.080
<v Speaker 2>we trick our bodies into thinking that we're living colorically restricted,

0:58:35.320 --> 0:58:37.560
<v Speaker 2>but we don't want to live calorically restricted?

0:58:38.480 --> 0:58:43.680
<v Speaker 1>What is the mechanism for chloric restriction increasing longevity? And

0:58:44.280 --> 0:58:46.040
<v Speaker 1>what does chloric restriction mean?

0:58:46.560 --> 0:58:51.320
<v Speaker 2>Great questions. So caloric restriction in animal models means reducing

0:58:51.320 --> 0:58:55.160
<v Speaker 2>an animal's nutrient intake to about thirty to forty percent

0:58:55.320 --> 0:58:59.880
<v Speaker 2>of what is typically considered necessary for like, you know,

0:59:00.040 --> 0:59:02.040
<v Speaker 2>the amount of calories that a mouse needs. So it's

0:59:02.320 --> 0:59:05.200
<v Speaker 2>very very restricted. I want to be extremely clear on

0:59:05.280 --> 0:59:07.960
<v Speaker 2>here that I am not by any means recommending this

0:59:08.120 --> 0:59:13.360
<v Speaker 2>for human beings. This could be very dangerous, okay, but

0:59:13.480 --> 0:59:18.360
<v Speaker 2>in mice, restricting them to that very small amount of

0:59:18.640 --> 0:59:21.400
<v Speaker 2>calories thirty to forty percent of what would normally be needed,

0:59:21.840 --> 0:59:26.240
<v Speaker 2>does increase lifespan, and it also increases the age at

0:59:26.280 --> 0:59:29.840
<v Speaker 2>which animals are able to reproduce, if that makes sense.

0:59:30.160 --> 0:59:33.000
<v Speaker 1>It increases how long you are reproductively viable.

0:59:33.080 --> 0:59:37.680
<v Speaker 2>Well, no, because these animals tend to not be able

0:59:37.720 --> 0:59:41.040
<v Speaker 2>to reproduce while they're living under caloric restriction. But then

0:59:41.080 --> 0:59:43.880
<v Speaker 2>they get to an age where normally, like a normal

0:59:43.920 --> 0:59:46.840
<v Speaker 2>mouse at say this many months of life would no

0:59:46.920 --> 0:59:50.280
<v Speaker 2>longer be able to reproduce. This mouse who's been calorically

0:59:50.320 --> 0:59:53.200
<v Speaker 2>restricted now can reproduce if you start feeding them.

0:59:53.520 --> 0:59:58.160
<v Speaker 1>Okay, butzing if the mouse is only consuming thirty to

0:59:58.200 --> 1:00:01.160
<v Speaker 1>forty percent of what is considered neces necessary for it

1:00:01.240 --> 1:00:04.440
<v Speaker 1>to live, how is it living well?

1:00:04.560 --> 1:00:08.120
<v Speaker 2>So that is the idea behind all of these factors. Basically,

1:00:08.240 --> 1:00:12.440
<v Speaker 2>the thought is that in so doing, in restricting these calories,

1:00:12.520 --> 1:00:16.360
<v Speaker 2>you're altering the way that the body is metabolizing everything

1:00:16.520 --> 1:00:19.960
<v Speaker 2>in a way that is promoting catabolism. So that breaking

1:00:20.000 --> 1:00:24.120
<v Speaker 2>down of our own body stores rather than anabolism, the

1:00:24.200 --> 1:00:26.680
<v Speaker 2>building up of our muscles, the building up.

1:00:26.600 --> 1:00:28.240
<v Speaker 1>Of fat stores. Right.

1:00:28.800 --> 1:00:34.000
<v Speaker 2>So that's the idea behind why caloric restriction works. We

1:00:34.160 --> 1:00:37.400
<v Speaker 2>know from animal model studies from a long long time

1:00:37.440 --> 1:00:41.800
<v Speaker 2>ago that restricting animals diets makes them live a longer time.

1:00:42.680 --> 1:00:47.120
<v Speaker 2>These genes and these factors and these hormones that have

1:00:47.200 --> 1:00:52.200
<v Speaker 2>been identified seem to be the possible mechanistic way that

1:00:52.240 --> 1:00:57.200
<v Speaker 2>caloric restriction manifests. So if we could directly affect those

1:00:57.640 --> 1:01:01.040
<v Speaker 2>mTOR or insulin or what have you, so then we

1:01:01.200 --> 1:01:06.200
<v Speaker 2>could trick our bodies into breaking down stores rather than

1:01:06.360 --> 1:01:10.320
<v Speaker 2>building fat, and that might make us live longer. That's

1:01:10.400 --> 1:01:12.440
<v Speaker 2>the theoretical idea behind it.

1:01:12.920 --> 1:01:16.200
<v Speaker 1>Interesting. Yeah, it kind of it reminds me of going

1:01:16.240 --> 1:01:20.680
<v Speaker 1>back to the evolutionary hypotheses, the germ soma theory, where

1:01:20.720 --> 1:01:25.080
<v Speaker 1>it's like the germ line is always favored, but maybe

1:01:25.120 --> 1:01:29.040
<v Speaker 1>here's the exception where if the soma line can't support

1:01:29.120 --> 1:01:33.280
<v Speaker 1>the germ line, then the soma line has to be favored. Yes, first, exactly.

1:01:33.400 --> 1:01:35.160
<v Speaker 2>I think that that is a good way to kind

1:01:35.160 --> 1:01:36.920
<v Speaker 2>of yeah, pieces together.

1:01:37.360 --> 1:01:37.920
<v Speaker 1>Interesting.

1:01:38.080 --> 1:01:42.919
<v Speaker 2>Okay, there's a few more, but I will say I'm

1:01:42.920 --> 1:01:45.000
<v Speaker 2>not going to go into quite as much detail because

1:01:45.040 --> 1:01:48.520
<v Speaker 2>from what I read, the topics that I've already covered

1:01:48.560 --> 1:01:50.480
<v Speaker 2>are maybe the ones where we are a little bit

1:01:50.520 --> 1:01:54.320
<v Speaker 2>farther along in that we have data from animal models

1:01:54.680 --> 1:02:01.160
<v Speaker 2>and from cell models to show that manipulating these various things,

1:02:01.200 --> 1:02:06.640
<v Speaker 2>be they nutrient sensing or you know, protein stability can

1:02:06.760 --> 1:02:12.440
<v Speaker 2>affect aging. The other ones are a bit more theoretical still,

1:02:12.520 --> 1:02:15.120
<v Speaker 2>at least from what I read. And apologies. If someone

1:02:15.200 --> 1:02:17.280
<v Speaker 2>has some great data that I didn't see on these

1:02:17.320 --> 1:02:17.960
<v Speaker 2>last few.

1:02:17.760 --> 1:02:20.240
<v Speaker 1>Topics, send it our way, ye if you do, I.

1:02:20.200 --> 1:02:24.320
<v Speaker 2>Would love to read it. So another possibility is the

1:02:24.360 --> 1:02:29.480
<v Speaker 2>idea of mitochondrial dysfunction. So our mitochondria are often called

1:02:29.480 --> 1:02:32.400
<v Speaker 2>the powerhouse of our cells. They do a lot for

1:02:32.480 --> 1:02:36.600
<v Speaker 2>our bodies, and the idea is that over time, just

1:02:36.680 --> 1:02:41.480
<v Speaker 2>like our DNA in our nucleus, these mitochondria can just

1:02:41.520 --> 1:02:44.800
<v Speaker 2>sort of not function as well anymore. This is thought

1:02:44.840 --> 1:02:48.400
<v Speaker 2>to be very related to things like oxidative stress over time.

1:02:49.800 --> 1:02:52.800
<v Speaker 2>That's all I got for you on mitochondrial dysfunction related

1:02:53.120 --> 1:02:57.600
<v Speaker 2>likely to the process of aging. Okay, there's also just

1:02:59.040 --> 1:03:05.000
<v Speaker 2>the idea of cellular sinescence in general, cells going quiescent

1:03:05.320 --> 1:03:08.080
<v Speaker 2>over time. A lot of our cells in our body

1:03:08.400 --> 1:03:11.680
<v Speaker 2>are not dead, but they no longer divide, they're no

1:03:11.800 --> 1:03:15.680
<v Speaker 2>longer active. So there's a large thought that just this

1:03:16.000 --> 1:03:19.800
<v Speaker 2>entire process of cells kind of turning off a lot

1:03:19.800 --> 1:03:25.160
<v Speaker 2>of their activity then relates to aging, and it's likely

1:03:25.360 --> 1:03:30.760
<v Speaker 2>protective to write, like, reduce the amount of DNA damage

1:03:30.800 --> 1:03:33.600
<v Speaker 2>that might occur through the process of replicating cells that

1:03:33.640 --> 1:03:36.440
<v Speaker 2>don't need to be replicated, et cetera. So this might

1:03:36.480 --> 1:03:40.560
<v Speaker 2>be something that's more related to protection against aging rather

1:03:40.640 --> 1:03:44.800
<v Speaker 2>than involved in the process of aging, like protective against it.

1:03:45.360 --> 1:03:46.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, Okay.

1:03:47.280 --> 1:03:51.920
<v Speaker 2>Then there's the idea of stem cell exhaustion, which I

1:03:51.960 --> 1:03:55.000
<v Speaker 2>again didn't get that much into detail of, but the

1:03:55.040 --> 1:03:57.240
<v Speaker 2>idea that our stem cells are the ones that aren't

1:03:57.280 --> 1:03:59.840
<v Speaker 2>able to keep up the way that they need to

1:03:59.840 --> 1:04:04.480
<v Speaker 2>to be able to produce more cells correctly, like the

1:04:04.520 --> 1:04:08.320
<v Speaker 2>basal layer of our skin. Cells are stem cells that

1:04:08.400 --> 1:04:12.200
<v Speaker 2>can become any various type of cell. But as insults

1:04:12.240 --> 1:04:15.200
<v Speaker 2>occur to these stem cells, then hence the process of

1:04:15.240 --> 1:04:16.720
<v Speaker 2>aging AI yeah.

1:04:16.800 --> 1:04:17.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

1:04:18.440 --> 1:04:22.080
<v Speaker 2>And finally, there is also this thought of defective or

1:04:22.120 --> 1:04:26.440
<v Speaker 2>diminished cell to cell communication. And there's a lot that

1:04:26.480 --> 1:04:30.760
<v Speaker 2>probably goes into this one that I think is interesting

1:04:30.800 --> 1:04:33.919
<v Speaker 2>and I didn't I will full disclosure, actually read any

1:04:34.240 --> 1:04:37.840
<v Speaker 2>papers by him, but I watched a TED talk of

1:04:37.920 --> 1:04:41.280
<v Speaker 2>this researcher named Michael Levin, who is a researcher at

1:04:41.320 --> 1:04:45.720
<v Speaker 2>Tufts University and does really interesting research on cell cell

1:04:45.760 --> 1:04:52.160
<v Speaker 2>communication from a bioelectric field perspective. Right, it's very very interesting.

1:04:52.320 --> 1:04:53.920
<v Speaker 2>But there's also a lot of other ways that our

1:04:53.960 --> 1:04:57.560
<v Speaker 2>cells communicate with each other besides potentially a bioelectric field.

1:04:57.720 --> 1:04:59.360
<v Speaker 2>But I will link to that Ted talk because it's

1:04:59.360 --> 1:05:04.000
<v Speaker 2>fascinating and it's likely that this process over time also

1:05:04.080 --> 1:05:07.200
<v Speaker 2>becomes defective and is involved in the process of aging.

1:05:08.080 --> 1:05:13.680
<v Speaker 2>That was like a very fast speed through and I

1:05:13.760 --> 1:05:17.120
<v Speaker 2>know that I left a lot of detail out. I

1:05:17.160 --> 1:05:19.800
<v Speaker 2>will cite a couple of papers, one from twenty thirteen

1:05:19.840 --> 1:05:22.040
<v Speaker 2>that's a few years old now, but another that is

1:05:22.080 --> 1:05:26.080
<v Speaker 2>a summary of a twenty twenty one symposium of gerontologists

1:05:26.520 --> 1:05:29.160
<v Speaker 2>that has a lot more detail on these nine different

1:05:29.200 --> 1:05:33.120
<v Speaker 2>processes and where we kind of stand in terms of

1:05:33.280 --> 1:05:38.240
<v Speaker 2>in vitro cell data, animal model data, and human data.

1:05:39.360 --> 1:05:41.280
<v Speaker 2>But the thing is, I think it's very clear just

1:05:41.320 --> 1:05:45.480
<v Speaker 2>for going over all those various processes that these are

1:05:45.480 --> 1:05:51.160
<v Speaker 2>all very interconnected, right, especially when we talk about humans.

1:05:51.680 --> 1:05:57.480
<v Speaker 2>It's not one single piece. All of these processes are

1:05:57.640 --> 1:05:59.959
<v Speaker 2>likely at play, and we are not at a point

1:06:00.080 --> 1:06:02.840
<v Speaker 2>where we can say that we have an answer or

1:06:02.920 --> 1:06:07.040
<v Speaker 2>a drug or an intervention at all. That can prolong

1:06:07.200 --> 1:06:11.680
<v Speaker 2>our life in any meaningful way. We don't even have

1:06:11.720 --> 1:06:14.920
<v Speaker 2>one that could likely prolong our health, at least not yet.

1:06:15.680 --> 1:06:19.560
<v Speaker 2>So really, for me, what it comes down to is

1:06:19.600 --> 1:06:26.240
<v Speaker 2>that forever it is a very very long time. So

1:06:26.320 --> 1:06:29.960
<v Speaker 2>do I think it's possible that humans will ever unlock

1:06:30.320 --> 1:06:38.560
<v Speaker 2>the many locks between us and immortality? No, I will say, no, Yeah,

1:06:38.840 --> 1:06:42.200
<v Speaker 2>it doesn't seem likely. It doesn't. Do I think that

1:06:42.280 --> 1:06:48.560
<v Speaker 2>it could be theoretically possible this concept of immortality kind

1:06:48.920 --> 1:06:51.480
<v Speaker 2>I kind of don't, Aron, do you know?

1:06:53.160 --> 1:06:57.720
<v Speaker 1>No, But I will say that Also what occurred to

1:06:57.760 --> 1:07:01.960
<v Speaker 1>me while you know, listening to you and while thinking

1:07:01.960 --> 1:07:05.040
<v Speaker 1>about the part that I went through, is that maybe,

1:07:05.520 --> 1:07:07.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, this is one of those things where in

1:07:07.600 --> 1:07:11.520
<v Speaker 1>the future, in the distant future, if anyone ever stumbles

1:07:11.560 --> 1:07:14.880
<v Speaker 1>across this podcast and they'll just laugh, I know how

1:07:15.000 --> 1:07:18.479
<v Speaker 1>naive we were and how unbelieving we were.

1:07:18.760 --> 1:07:24.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I maybe maybe I similarly doubt it.

1:07:24.880 --> 1:07:26.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, and I think that's the other thing too,

1:07:26.960 --> 1:07:32.280
<v Speaker 1>is that immortality is not what people are working on exactly,

1:07:32.760 --> 1:07:34.400
<v Speaker 1>it's how it's being sold.

1:07:34.600 --> 1:07:37.160
<v Speaker 2>Yes, And one of the things that I think is

1:07:37.200 --> 1:07:44.280
<v Speaker 2>really interesting in reading from the gerontology perspective is that

1:07:45.360 --> 1:07:48.160
<v Speaker 2>I do think that a lot of the research into

1:07:48.200 --> 1:07:52.280
<v Speaker 2>these questions of like how does aging happen and can

1:07:52.360 --> 1:07:57.600
<v Speaker 2>we manipulate those processes? This research can be used to

1:07:57.720 --> 1:08:00.920
<v Speaker 2>improve the lives of humans, and I do think that

1:08:01.000 --> 1:08:04.320
<v Speaker 2>it could potentially increase our health span and delay the

1:08:04.360 --> 1:08:07.800
<v Speaker 2>onset of all these various aging related diseases. But what's

1:08:07.960 --> 1:08:12.919
<v Speaker 2>interesting is that we tend to study all of these

1:08:13.080 --> 1:08:20.160
<v Speaker 2>various age related diseases, cardiovascular disease, cancer, Alzheimer's disease. We

1:08:20.240 --> 1:08:22.200
<v Speaker 2>study these diseases in isolation.

1:08:22.680 --> 1:08:24.200
<v Speaker 1>Ooh, that's such a good point.

1:08:24.400 --> 1:08:29.240
<v Speaker 2>And aging itself is not considered a disease, so you

1:08:29.320 --> 1:08:33.840
<v Speaker 2>cannot study it from a like applying for nih Grant's perspective,

1:08:33.960 --> 1:08:37.040
<v Speaker 2>or from a drug development perspective. You cannot study it

1:08:37.080 --> 1:08:39.280
<v Speaker 2>in the same way that you can study diseases.

1:08:39.439 --> 1:08:41.959
<v Speaker 1>Oh, that is very interesting.

1:08:42.160 --> 1:08:45.120
<v Speaker 2>It really is, because it also means that the funding

1:08:45.360 --> 1:08:49.439
<v Speaker 2>is not actually being directed towards aging. The funding from

1:08:49.520 --> 1:08:54.479
<v Speaker 2>the government is being directed towards addressing these diseases that

1:08:54.520 --> 1:08:58.439
<v Speaker 2>we think maybe could be preventable. Right, But if we

1:08:58.600 --> 1:09:01.639
<v Speaker 2>think that these are inter related diseases that are all

1:09:01.760 --> 1:09:05.360
<v Speaker 2>part of the process of aging, then wouldn't it make

1:09:05.400 --> 1:09:08.880
<v Speaker 2>more sense to address them from a wider perspective by

1:09:08.920 --> 1:09:13.200
<v Speaker 2>addressing these underlying mechanisms rather than addressing cardiovascular disease or

1:09:13.240 --> 1:09:19.320
<v Speaker 2>diabetes itself and cancer itself. Let's think about these things

1:09:19.360 --> 1:09:22.280
<v Speaker 2>that underpin both of those or all of those. And

1:09:22.320 --> 1:09:24.320
<v Speaker 2>so I think that that's kind of the argument of

1:09:24.360 --> 1:09:26.599
<v Speaker 2>a lot of the people who do this type of research,

1:09:26.640 --> 1:09:30.479
<v Speaker 2>and I think it's really valid. And maybe that's the

1:09:30.840 --> 1:09:35.719
<v Speaker 2>gap that some of these biotech companies are filling by

1:09:35.800 --> 1:09:39.920
<v Speaker 2>directing their funding to address that. I don't know, maybe

1:09:40.000 --> 1:09:44.479
<v Speaker 2>that's an optimistic view, but maybe that is.

1:09:45.000 --> 1:09:48.519
<v Speaker 1>That's a really good point. And I mean, I know

1:09:48.640 --> 1:09:51.200
<v Speaker 1>that like a lot of epidemiological studies will look at

1:09:51.240 --> 1:09:56.519
<v Speaker 1>all of these things together, but it just there are

1:09:56.560 --> 1:09:58.439
<v Speaker 1>so many different avetus of research.

1:09:58.800 --> 1:10:00.639
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and but it.

1:10:00.560 --> 1:10:05.559
<v Speaker 1>Does seem like aging is super multifactorial. A lot of

1:10:05.600 --> 1:10:11.320
<v Speaker 1>these diseases are super multifactorial, but some of the factor

1:10:11.520 --> 1:10:18.040
<v Speaker 1>like that they are like siloed diseases exactly. That's yeah.

1:10:18.200 --> 1:10:21.320
<v Speaker 2>I also think it's important to point out, like you mentioned, Aaron,

1:10:21.479 --> 1:10:25.280
<v Speaker 2>there are a lot of other in my mind, ethical

1:10:25.400 --> 1:10:31.240
<v Speaker 2>and moral concerns related to this idea of pursuing an

1:10:31.360 --> 1:10:37.000
<v Speaker 2>increased lifespan or health span in thinking about the state

1:10:37.040 --> 1:10:42.720
<v Speaker 2>of our planet and climate change and how we've impacted

1:10:42.720 --> 1:10:46.120
<v Speaker 2>our planet with the lifespans that we currently have, and

1:10:46.280 --> 1:10:50.280
<v Speaker 2>also in like you said, where is this development and

1:10:50.320 --> 1:10:53.640
<v Speaker 2>technology going to go? Who is going to benefit from it?

1:10:53.720 --> 1:10:56.280
<v Speaker 2>Because the increase in life span that we've seen in

1:10:56.320 --> 1:10:58.559
<v Speaker 2>the last fifty to one hundred years hasn't been even

1:10:58.600 --> 1:11:02.000
<v Speaker 2>across the board, and people who are wealthy live much

1:11:02.040 --> 1:11:06.240
<v Speaker 2>longer than people who are not wealthy, and so that

1:11:06.520 --> 1:11:09.439
<v Speaker 2>is likely going to continue to be true, especially if

1:11:10.320 --> 1:11:12.639
<v Speaker 2>all of the research being done on this is from

1:11:12.960 --> 1:11:19.240
<v Speaker 2>a capitalistic perspective of companies trying to make money off

1:11:19.280 --> 1:11:19.519
<v Speaker 2>of it.

1:11:20.080 --> 1:11:23.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I mean, anti aging is one of

1:11:24.000 --> 1:11:26.000
<v Speaker 1>the world's biggest industries.

1:11:26.240 --> 1:11:27.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, definitely, it really is.

1:11:28.320 --> 1:11:31.639
<v Speaker 1>And like, and I'll repeat again, not a single anti

1:11:31.680 --> 1:11:37.200
<v Speaker 1>aging product has been shown to actually slow stop or

1:11:37.240 --> 1:11:39.400
<v Speaker 1>reverse aging in any capacity.

1:11:39.680 --> 1:11:48.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, diet and exercise, erin diet and exercise. Yeah, listeners,

1:11:48.560 --> 1:11:52.360
<v Speaker 2>do you think you'd want to live forever? I'm curious.

1:11:52.800 --> 1:11:55.639
<v Speaker 1>I'm curious, and if so.

1:11:56.680 --> 1:12:01.120
<v Speaker 2>Why or why not?

1:12:02.160 --> 1:12:02.640
<v Speaker 1>Or why not?

1:12:03.000 --> 1:12:04.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah?

1:12:04.880 --> 1:12:09.360
<v Speaker 1>Should we do sources? Yeah? I have a bunch, but

1:12:09.479 --> 1:12:12.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to shout out two books in particular that

1:12:12.160 --> 1:12:15.519
<v Speaker 1>I found really helpful. So in terms of the evolution

1:12:15.680 --> 1:12:18.640
<v Speaker 1>of sinessence and the evolution of aging. There is a

1:12:18.760 --> 1:12:23.400
<v Speaker 1>book by Jefferson at All or a bunch of editors

1:12:23.880 --> 1:12:26.760
<v Speaker 1>titled The Evolution of Sinessence in the Tree of Life,

1:12:26.800 --> 1:12:30.400
<v Speaker 1>and that's from twenty seventeen. And then the book that

1:12:30.439 --> 1:12:35.200
<v Speaker 1>I already mentioned by Stephen Cave Immortality the Quest to

1:12:35.200 --> 1:12:38.240
<v Speaker 1>Live Forever and how it drives Civilization, and those are

1:12:38.280 --> 1:12:42.040
<v Speaker 1>both really I just really enjoyed the Stephen Cave book

1:12:42.080 --> 1:12:45.640
<v Speaker 1>as an interesting way to look at immortality.

1:12:46.560 --> 1:12:50.439
<v Speaker 2>I had a couple that I enjoyed. Those two that

1:12:50.560 --> 1:12:56.240
<v Speaker 2>focused on the various hows of aging were a paper

1:12:56.360 --> 1:13:00.559
<v Speaker 2>from Cell in twenty thirteen titled the Hallmarks of Aging,

1:13:01.320 --> 1:13:06.560
<v Speaker 2>as well as a symposium report from the Annals of

1:13:06.600 --> 1:13:09.000
<v Speaker 2>the New York Academy of Sciences from twenty twenty two

1:13:09.160 --> 1:13:14.120
<v Speaker 2>titled Extending Human Lifespan and Longevity a symposium report. I

1:13:14.160 --> 1:13:17.360
<v Speaker 2>also thought an important one to mention is a paper

1:13:17.360 --> 1:13:20.519
<v Speaker 2>from twenty twenty one called Longevity Leap Mind the Health

1:13:20.560 --> 1:13:24.320
<v Speaker 2>Span Gap. And then there was there's a bunch more

1:13:24.360 --> 1:13:26.920
<v Speaker 2>so I'll link to them on our website, This podcast

1:13:26.960 --> 1:13:29.160
<v Speaker 2>will kill You dot com under the episodes TAT.

1:13:31.120 --> 1:13:34.360
<v Speaker 1>Thank you to Bloodmobile for providing the music for this

1:13:34.479 --> 1:13:36.600
<v Speaker 1>episode and all of our episodes.

1:13:37.000 --> 1:13:39.320
<v Speaker 2>Thank you to the Exactly Right Network, of whom we're

1:13:39.360 --> 1:13:40.520
<v Speaker 2>proud to be a part.

1:13:41.040 --> 1:13:45.240
<v Speaker 1>And thank you to you listeners. I really hoped that

1:13:45.360 --> 1:13:46.840
<v Speaker 1>you liked this one.

1:13:47.160 --> 1:13:50.679
<v Speaker 2>Yeah yeah, I hope so too. And a special thank

1:13:50.680 --> 1:13:54.160
<v Speaker 2>you to our patrons as always, thank you so much

1:13:54.280 --> 1:13:55.160
<v Speaker 2>for supporting us.

1:13:55.640 --> 1:14:00.479
<v Speaker 1>Yeah well erin Happy one hundred, Happy one hundred and

1:14:00.880 --> 1:14:03.480
<v Speaker 1>until next time, wash your hands.

1:14:03.280 --> 1:14:09.200
<v Speaker 2>You filled the animals m