WEBVTT - Elfshot, Part 2

0:00:03.040 --> 0:00:05.360
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind production of My

0:00:05.480 --> 0:00:14.720
<v Speaker 1>Heart Radio. Hey you welcome to Stuff to Blow your Mind.

0:00:15.080 --> 0:00:17.639
<v Speaker 1>This is Robert Lamb and this is Joe McCormick, and

0:00:17.720 --> 0:00:22.520
<v Speaker 1>we're back with part two of our series on elf Shot. Now,

0:00:22.880 --> 0:00:25.480
<v Speaker 1>this is an idea we introduced in part one. If

0:00:25.520 --> 0:00:27.200
<v Speaker 1>you haven't listened to that yet, you should go back

0:00:27.280 --> 0:00:30.400
<v Speaker 1>check that one out first. But basically elf shot is

0:00:30.440 --> 0:00:33.680
<v Speaker 1>a what would you say, rob like, it's a complex

0:00:33.760 --> 0:00:38.240
<v Speaker 1>of interlocking folk beliefs, not a single belief, but it's

0:00:38.280 --> 0:00:42.559
<v Speaker 1>found especially in the British Isles and essentially centering on

0:00:42.600 --> 0:00:47.120
<v Speaker 1>the idea of fairies or elves attacking mortal humans and

0:00:47.240 --> 0:00:51.080
<v Speaker 1>especially their live stock with supernatural weapons. Would you say

0:00:51.159 --> 0:00:53.760
<v Speaker 1>that's fair? Yeah? Yeah. There there's a lot going on

0:00:53.840 --> 0:00:56.240
<v Speaker 1>in it, as we discussed in the first episode. I mean,

0:00:56.280 --> 0:01:01.160
<v Speaker 1>on one hand, there there's the interpretation of artifacts, artifacts

0:01:01.200 --> 0:01:07.360
<v Speaker 1>that from various time periods, both ancient and relatively recent. Uh.

0:01:07.400 --> 0:01:13.200
<v Speaker 1>There's also the attempt to understand mysterious ailments, mostly in

0:01:13.200 --> 0:01:16.960
<v Speaker 1>in livestock, but sometimes in human beings as well, and

0:01:17.000 --> 0:01:20.640
<v Speaker 1>then various folk traditions getting wrapped up into these scripts.

0:01:20.920 --> 0:01:23.759
<v Speaker 1>And it's also it seems to be highly regional too.

0:01:24.360 --> 0:01:27.680
<v Speaker 1>Uh so it's uh, it's not. There's not just one

0:01:27.840 --> 0:01:31.480
<v Speaker 1>elf aero script. We have multiple scripts. It ends up

0:01:31.480 --> 0:01:34.320
<v Speaker 1>tying into folk medicine and so forth as well. Yeah,

0:01:34.319 --> 0:01:37.399
<v Speaker 1>and that folk medicine aspect is is very interesting. I

0:01:37.400 --> 0:01:38.959
<v Speaker 1>want to come back to that in just a minute.

0:01:39.280 --> 0:01:41.759
<v Speaker 1>So in the last episode we we did talk about

0:01:41.840 --> 0:01:46.120
<v Speaker 1>some direct accounts of folk beliefs about elf shot, especially

0:01:46.120 --> 0:01:47.920
<v Speaker 1>in Scotland, I think is where a lot of these

0:01:47.920 --> 0:01:51.440
<v Speaker 1>accounts came from, and they included things like, okay, you

0:01:51.520 --> 0:01:54.080
<v Speaker 1>have a story where a calf suddenly falls ill and

0:01:54.160 --> 0:01:58.600
<v Speaker 1>dies with no apparent explanation, and then the farmer confirms

0:01:58.640 --> 0:02:01.880
<v Speaker 1>that elf shot was the cause because he and his

0:02:02.040 --> 0:02:04.600
<v Speaker 1>neighbor open up the cow's body and they find a

0:02:04.640 --> 0:02:07.560
<v Speaker 1>hole in its heart, even though there was no hole

0:02:07.640 --> 0:02:10.320
<v Speaker 1>in the hide. So it must have been some kind

0:02:10.360 --> 0:02:14.079
<v Speaker 1>of supernatural fairy weapon that can pierce through the hide

0:02:14.120 --> 0:02:17.840
<v Speaker 1>without actually breaking it and strike only the internal organs.

0:02:18.639 --> 0:02:21.639
<v Speaker 1>And then, of course, when it was believed that there

0:02:21.760 --> 0:02:24.000
<v Speaker 1>was an injury of this kind caused by an elf

0:02:24.040 --> 0:02:27.760
<v Speaker 1>for a fairy weapon, uh, there were plenty of magical

0:02:27.840 --> 0:02:31.200
<v Speaker 1>remedies and rob can you characterize what some of the

0:02:31.200 --> 0:02:34.240
<v Speaker 1>main themes in these remedies were. Yeah, some of the

0:02:34.240 --> 0:02:37.359
<v Speaker 1>main themes included, of course, being able to fetch either

0:02:37.520 --> 0:02:40.960
<v Speaker 1>the elf arrow or or have an elf arrow that

0:02:41.000 --> 0:02:44.240
<v Speaker 1>you found, or elf arrows that were in the possession

0:02:44.360 --> 0:02:47.960
<v Speaker 1>of the town or local community, and using those in

0:02:48.000 --> 0:02:51.280
<v Speaker 1>the treatment. Oftentimes this would take the form of of

0:02:51.320 --> 0:02:54.880
<v Speaker 1>immersing them in water and then using that that water

0:02:55.520 --> 0:02:59.080
<v Speaker 1>either as a drink for the afflicted or as something

0:02:59.120 --> 0:03:01.480
<v Speaker 1>that is rubbed on the liquid, flickted or poured on

0:03:01.480 --> 0:03:05.239
<v Speaker 1>the site of the wounding, that sort of thing. But again,

0:03:05.240 --> 0:03:06.840
<v Speaker 1>there are a number of different versions of this, and

0:03:07.400 --> 0:03:10.880
<v Speaker 1>the various wrinkles get added depending on which tradition you're

0:03:10.880 --> 0:03:14.000
<v Speaker 1>looking at which account. Yeah, other things were just like, hey,

0:03:14.120 --> 0:03:17.800
<v Speaker 1>mix up some gunpowder with some eggs and stuff like

0:03:17.840 --> 0:03:21.000
<v Speaker 1>that and then feed that to the cow. Right delicious.

0:03:21.720 --> 0:03:25.000
<v Speaker 1>But anyway, I wanted to address a question that came

0:03:25.080 --> 0:03:27.880
<v Speaker 1>up while we were talking uh talking last time. I

0:03:27.880 --> 0:03:29.720
<v Speaker 1>didn't have the answer to it at the time, so

0:03:29.760 --> 0:03:32.960
<v Speaker 1>I decided to look it up before we recorded this episode.

0:03:33.280 --> 0:03:36.560
<v Speaker 1>And the question is is there such a thing as

0:03:36.600 --> 0:03:40.880
<v Speaker 1>the placebo effect for non human animals? Of course, the

0:03:40.920 --> 0:03:44.400
<v Speaker 1>placebo effect in humans is something that often comes up

0:03:44.400 --> 0:03:47.960
<v Speaker 1>when we're talking about, well, you're talking about medicine in

0:03:48.000 --> 0:03:51.040
<v Speaker 1>any context, but it's especially important when you're talking about

0:03:51.040 --> 0:03:54.680
<v Speaker 1>like the history of pre scientific medicine, Like why did

0:03:54.800 --> 0:03:58.960
<v Speaker 1>people think that soaking a stone arrowhead and water and

0:03:59.000 --> 0:04:02.240
<v Speaker 1>then pressing it to their skin had actually healed them

0:04:02.280 --> 0:04:04.640
<v Speaker 1>of a disease? Like if you have a you know,

0:04:04.720 --> 0:04:08.560
<v Speaker 1>any a tumor or a bacterial infection or something, we

0:04:08.640 --> 0:04:12.480
<v Speaker 1>can be relatively confident that this intervention does not actually

0:04:12.560 --> 0:04:15.920
<v Speaker 1>shrink the tumor or kill the bacteria. And yet people

0:04:16.080 --> 0:04:19.960
<v Speaker 1>often thought interventions like this had healed them. So what

0:04:20.160 --> 0:04:22.440
<v Speaker 1>made them think that? I think some of that can

0:04:22.480 --> 0:04:25.520
<v Speaker 1>be chalked up to a concept that we did an

0:04:25.520 --> 0:04:28.880
<v Speaker 1>episode about, I think last year. It was a statistical

0:04:28.880 --> 0:04:33.200
<v Speaker 1>phenomenon called regression towards the mean or regression to the mean.

0:04:33.520 --> 0:04:36.720
<v Speaker 1>But you can also think of this concept as returning

0:04:36.720 --> 0:04:40.279
<v Speaker 1>to the baseline. So UH as a quick explainer for that,

0:04:40.360 --> 0:04:42.919
<v Speaker 1>imagine you suddenly get a pain in your foot and

0:04:42.960 --> 0:04:46.520
<v Speaker 1>you've never had that pain before, and you're like, ah,

0:04:46.560 --> 0:04:48.479
<v Speaker 1>it really hurts. I don't know what to do, but

0:04:48.560 --> 0:04:51.240
<v Speaker 1>your friend says, well, I know what to do. You

0:04:51.279 --> 0:04:53.599
<v Speaker 1>have to sing a Gregorian chant and then you have

0:04:53.680 --> 0:04:57.520
<v Speaker 1>to lick the morning do from a spider's web. So

0:04:57.880 --> 0:05:00.280
<v Speaker 1>you try that out. You want your foot to stop hurting,

0:05:00.279 --> 0:05:02.480
<v Speaker 1>and then what do you know, sometime after that, your

0:05:02.520 --> 0:05:06.480
<v Speaker 1>foot does stop hurting. Now, in a situation like this,

0:05:06.600 --> 0:05:09.679
<v Speaker 1>we we really all have a tendency to think something

0:05:09.760 --> 0:05:14.080
<v Speaker 1>has been proved here, like, ah, the spider do did work,

0:05:14.880 --> 0:05:17.479
<v Speaker 1>But actually, how do you know that your foot wouldn't

0:05:17.480 --> 0:05:20.680
<v Speaker 1>have stopped hurting on its own, just as soon if

0:05:20.720 --> 0:05:23.680
<v Speaker 1>you didn't do any of that stuff. In fact, the

0:05:23.680 --> 0:05:27.600
<v Speaker 1>whole point is that your foot doesn't usually hurt. The

0:05:27.640 --> 0:05:31.560
<v Speaker 1>state of pain is an outlier, that's an anomalous condition,

0:05:32.080 --> 0:05:35.320
<v Speaker 1>So things going back to normal on a certain time

0:05:35.360 --> 0:05:39.279
<v Speaker 1>scale is a totally expected outcome, all things being equal,

0:05:39.800 --> 0:05:42.680
<v Speaker 1>and regression to the mean is especially important in medicine

0:05:42.720 --> 0:05:46.240
<v Speaker 1>because it tends to be specifically when we're in an

0:05:46.240 --> 0:05:49.640
<v Speaker 1>anomalous condition, a condition that is not normal for us,

0:05:50.000 --> 0:05:53.080
<v Speaker 1>that we seek medical interventions. So if you want to

0:05:53.080 --> 0:05:55.840
<v Speaker 1>know if a medical intervention actually works or not, you

0:05:55.880 --> 0:06:01.920
<v Speaker 1>have to compare its efficacy against a say, placebo control group.

0:06:02.240 --> 0:06:05.120
<v Speaker 1>Instead of just giving somebody a treatment and saying did

0:06:05.160 --> 0:06:06.880
<v Speaker 1>you get better? If you do that, you don't know

0:06:06.920 --> 0:06:09.720
<v Speaker 1>if they would have gotten better anyway. Having the comparison

0:06:10.080 --> 0:06:12.960
<v Speaker 1>between the two groups gives you confidence in the efficacy.

0:06:14.000 --> 0:06:16.360
<v Speaker 1>But on top of just the regression to the mean

0:06:16.440 --> 0:06:19.480
<v Speaker 1>as a as a baseline effect, you've also got psychological

0:06:19.520 --> 0:06:22.880
<v Speaker 1>effects where if you actually compare people who receive an

0:06:22.920 --> 0:06:27.160
<v Speaker 1>intervention like a medicine or a ritual or a doctor's

0:06:27.279 --> 0:06:31.479
<v Speaker 1>visit versus people who don't receive any intervention, sometimes people

0:06:31.520 --> 0:06:35.279
<v Speaker 1>who receive an intervention have better outcomes on average, even

0:06:35.320 --> 0:06:38.480
<v Speaker 1>if there's no way that intervention is actually doing anything.

0:06:38.600 --> 0:06:42.000
<v Speaker 1>If it's like you know, pressing the arrowhead deer skin. Uh.

0:06:42.040 --> 0:06:46.080
<v Speaker 1>This might be considered the pure placebo effect, improved outcomes

0:06:46.080 --> 0:06:49.760
<v Speaker 1>associated with an intervention even though it's not doing anything

0:06:49.839 --> 0:06:53.760
<v Speaker 1>mechanistically or chemically to solve the problem. And though the

0:06:53.800 --> 0:06:57.159
<v Speaker 1>placebo effect shows up for a range of conditions and treatments,

0:06:57.160 --> 0:07:00.000
<v Speaker 1>it seems to be especially powerful for conditions that are

0:07:00.040 --> 0:07:03.640
<v Speaker 1>modulated by the brain, such as the perception of pain

0:07:03.800 --> 0:07:06.760
<v Speaker 1>and other types of discomfort. So, to bring it back

0:07:06.760 --> 0:07:09.960
<v Speaker 1>to the question of of elf shot cattle, could it

0:07:10.000 --> 0:07:14.280
<v Speaker 1>be possible that a non human animal benefits from the

0:07:14.280 --> 0:07:18.640
<v Speaker 1>placebo effect of a magical cure in some way, even

0:07:18.680 --> 0:07:22.280
<v Speaker 1>though they can't understand the concept of medicine or develop

0:07:22.520 --> 0:07:26.720
<v Speaker 1>expectations that the magical cure would heal them. Uh. And

0:07:26.760 --> 0:07:28.560
<v Speaker 1>the you know the thing I was wondering about what

0:07:28.640 --> 0:07:32.240
<v Speaker 1>this is. There's evidence that some placebo effects and humans

0:07:32.240 --> 0:07:35.040
<v Speaker 1>are created not so much by the expectation that the

0:07:35.120 --> 0:07:40.160
<v Speaker 1>treatment is efficacious, but by the reassurance felt in the

0:07:40.160 --> 0:07:42.640
<v Speaker 1>presence of a doctor or nurse who has a good

0:07:42.640 --> 0:07:46.240
<v Speaker 1>bedside manner. And I thought, well, maybe it's possible that

0:07:46.320 --> 0:07:49.440
<v Speaker 1>animals could be calmed or soothed by certain kinds of

0:07:49.520 --> 0:07:52.720
<v Speaker 1>human attention, even if they're not able to understand that

0:07:52.840 --> 0:07:56.280
<v Speaker 1>it is for the intended purpose of healing. So anyway,

0:07:56.280 --> 0:07:58.640
<v Speaker 1>I went looking this up and I found an interesting

0:07:58.720 --> 0:08:02.000
<v Speaker 1>article by Emily Antis, who is also the author of

0:08:02.040 --> 0:08:03.880
<v Speaker 1>a book we've talked about on the show before called

0:08:03.920 --> 0:08:06.880
<v Speaker 1>The Great Indoors that's all about the effects of living

0:08:06.880 --> 0:08:09.960
<v Speaker 1>and spending time indoors. But this was an article published

0:08:09.960 --> 0:08:13.960
<v Speaker 1>in the Atlantic in twenty nineteen called a Crucial blind

0:08:14.000 --> 0:08:18.160
<v Speaker 1>Spot in Veterinary Medicine. So the top line answer here

0:08:18.400 --> 0:08:21.600
<v Speaker 1>is a clear yes. There is such a thing as

0:08:21.640 --> 0:08:25.400
<v Speaker 1>the placebo effect in non human animals in veterinary medicine,

0:08:25.880 --> 0:08:29.559
<v Speaker 1>but it probably works by different means than the human

0:08:29.680 --> 0:08:32.640
<v Speaker 1>version of the placebo effect. So here's an example, and

0:08:32.760 --> 0:08:37.439
<v Speaker 1>this begins by talking about a particular study of treatments

0:08:37.520 --> 0:08:41.640
<v Speaker 1>for canine epilepsy epilepsy and dogs. This research was being

0:08:41.679 --> 0:08:43.760
<v Speaker 1>carried out in the early two thousands. I think this

0:08:43.800 --> 0:08:47.280
<v Speaker 1>was in the year two thousand three, and the citation

0:08:47.440 --> 0:08:51.120
<v Speaker 1>here is the Journal of Veterinary Medicine. The article was

0:08:51.160 --> 0:08:55.040
<v Speaker 1>called Placebo Effect in Canine Epilepsy Trials and the authors

0:08:55.040 --> 0:08:59.839
<v Speaker 1>were Munyana, Jong and Patterson, eventually published in two thousand ten.

0:09:00.679 --> 0:09:03.920
<v Speaker 1>And the story is that the researchers were testing an

0:09:03.960 --> 0:09:09.320
<v Speaker 1>ant convulsant drug called uh leave tarrassetam, and it was

0:09:09.400 --> 0:09:13.960
<v Speaker 1>intended to curtail epileptic seizures in dogs. So in the

0:09:14.000 --> 0:09:16.200
<v Speaker 1>test group, the group that was actually getting the drug,

0:09:16.440 --> 0:09:21.160
<v Speaker 1>eight six percent of dogs of their owners reported a

0:09:21.240 --> 0:09:25.480
<v Speaker 1>reduction in seizure frequency, which bodes very well for the drug.

0:09:26.120 --> 0:09:29.120
<v Speaker 1>But then the study also happened to have a placebo

0:09:29.200 --> 0:09:32.240
<v Speaker 1>control group, which we're receiving a dummy treatment that was

0:09:32.240 --> 0:09:36.240
<v Speaker 1>supposed to do nothing, and in that group, seventy nine

0:09:36.240 --> 0:09:41.000
<v Speaker 1>percent also saw a reduction in reported seizures seventy nine

0:09:41.080 --> 0:09:44.599
<v Speaker 1>compared to eighty six. That's that's impressive, right, Well, it

0:09:44.640 --> 0:09:47.760
<v Speaker 1>would tend to make you doubt that that the test group,

0:09:48.120 --> 0:09:51.000
<v Speaker 1>that that it's actually the drug that is making the difference.

0:09:51.520 --> 0:09:54.280
<v Speaker 1>So at the time of this study, Anthes notes that

0:09:54.320 --> 0:09:57.320
<v Speaker 1>the double blind placebo controlled trials were not all that

0:09:57.400 --> 0:10:01.160
<v Speaker 1>common in veterinary medicine, which makes sense on one hand

0:10:01.200 --> 0:10:04.200
<v Speaker 1>because again, like non human, animals are not thought to

0:10:04.240 --> 0:10:08.480
<v Speaker 1>be able to develop expectations about a about a drug

0:10:08.520 --> 0:10:11.240
<v Speaker 1>treatment or the efficacy of medicine, So how could you

0:10:11.280 --> 0:10:14.959
<v Speaker 1>expect a placebo effect to exist in dogs? But it's

0:10:15.000 --> 0:10:17.960
<v Speaker 1>a good thing to study did use such a controlled design,

0:10:18.160 --> 0:10:22.400
<v Speaker 1>because otherwise the medicine would have looked really good until

0:10:22.480 --> 0:10:25.560
<v Speaker 1>you realize that fake medicine leads to results that look

0:10:25.640 --> 0:10:28.520
<v Speaker 1>about the same or almost as good. I guess it's

0:10:28.559 --> 0:10:33.120
<v Speaker 1>just the healing power of pill pockets, right, my god,

0:10:33.200 --> 0:10:35.600
<v Speaker 1>you can never doubt the hand that those things stink

0:10:35.720 --> 0:10:38.719
<v Speaker 1>so much and dogs love them. What do they put

0:10:38.720 --> 0:10:40.560
<v Speaker 1>in those things? Do do you work in a pill

0:10:40.600 --> 0:10:43.240
<v Speaker 1>pocket factory? Tell? Maybe we don't want to know what

0:10:43.280 --> 0:10:46.679
<v Speaker 1>goes into pill pocket. That would be that's Halloween content.

0:10:47.120 --> 0:10:50.240
<v Speaker 1>I have not had a good run with with feline

0:10:50.280 --> 0:10:53.000
<v Speaker 1>pill pockets. Um oh, I'm sorry, and I'm not to

0:10:53.040 --> 0:10:55.200
<v Speaker 1>say they don't. You know, they work in some some cats,

0:10:55.280 --> 0:10:57.840
<v Speaker 1>and some cats are not crazy about them. My cat

0:10:58.240 --> 0:11:02.560
<v Speaker 1>will spit it out and then like dissected. And in

0:11:02.600 --> 0:11:04.440
<v Speaker 1>some brands of pill pockets you just didn't want to

0:11:04.559 --> 0:11:06.640
<v Speaker 1>want a piece off anyway, She's like, no, not eating that.

0:11:06.880 --> 0:11:09.880
<v Speaker 1>So do you ever use the trick this? This works

0:11:09.880 --> 0:11:13.079
<v Speaker 1>for us in the past where if if the animal

0:11:13.160 --> 0:11:15.920
<v Speaker 1>is skeptical of the pill pocket with the pill in it,

0:11:16.080 --> 0:11:18.720
<v Speaker 1>you first have to give them an empty pill pocket

0:11:18.800 --> 0:11:21.000
<v Speaker 1>that has no pill in it, so they get used

0:11:21.040 --> 0:11:22.920
<v Speaker 1>to like, oh yeah, I can just eat this straight up.

0:11:22.960 --> 0:11:25.240
<v Speaker 1>And then the second one or the third one you

0:11:25.280 --> 0:11:27.480
<v Speaker 1>give them. I mean, that's a lot of pill pockets

0:11:27.480 --> 0:11:30.160
<v Speaker 1>if you're stacking it up. But if you're desperate, you

0:11:30.200 --> 0:11:34.280
<v Speaker 1>can try the empty pill pocket first to lower their defenses. Well,

0:11:34.320 --> 0:11:36.920
<v Speaker 1>you'd think that would work, but we ended up using

0:11:36.960 --> 0:11:40.440
<v Speaker 1>the water syringe to just blast it into the back

0:11:40.480 --> 0:11:42.959
<v Speaker 1>of her throat and that seems to work well again

0:11:43.000 --> 0:11:44.440
<v Speaker 1>and that's a method that's not going to work for

0:11:44.440 --> 0:11:47.480
<v Speaker 1>every cat either, So it's uh, it's tough getting the

0:11:47.480 --> 0:11:50.199
<v Speaker 1>meds in these animals sometimes. Oh and I should also

0:11:50.280 --> 0:11:53.360
<v Speaker 1>know that. So the main study uh Anthes is talking

0:11:53.360 --> 0:11:56.080
<v Speaker 1>about here in this article is in dogs, but she

0:11:56.160 --> 0:11:59.120
<v Speaker 1>also cites studies that have reported placebo effects in cats

0:11:59.240 --> 0:12:02.600
<v Speaker 1>and in horse is. Uh So, anyway, how on earth

0:12:02.640 --> 0:12:06.360
<v Speaker 1>could this be? Like again, we're assuming that dogs themselves

0:12:06.400 --> 0:12:10.280
<v Speaker 1>are not developing expectations that a drug will be effective.

0:12:10.320 --> 0:12:12.720
<v Speaker 1>I think that's a very fair assumption. They don't understand

0:12:12.720 --> 0:12:15.680
<v Speaker 1>what's going on. How on earth could such a strong

0:12:15.720 --> 0:12:19.600
<v Speaker 1>placebo effect manifest? And a number of ideas are discussed

0:12:19.600 --> 0:12:22.280
<v Speaker 1>in this article. One is, when we already talked about

0:12:22.400 --> 0:12:25.120
<v Speaker 1>regression to the mean, right, people are more likely to

0:12:25.880 --> 0:12:29.360
<v Speaker 1>enroll in a clinical trial for their dogs epilepsy if

0:12:29.440 --> 0:12:33.640
<v Speaker 1>seizures have been especially bad lately, And conditions like epilepsy

0:12:33.679 --> 0:12:36.480
<v Speaker 1>tend to sort of wax and wane on their own anyway,

0:12:37.000 --> 0:12:39.360
<v Speaker 1>So you know, you could enroll the dog at a

0:12:39.440 --> 0:12:42.040
<v Speaker 1>time when their seizures are bad, and then that would

0:12:42.080 --> 0:12:45.520
<v Speaker 1>just tend to, by the law of averages, give way

0:12:45.559 --> 0:12:47.840
<v Speaker 1>to a period where they return to the baseline and

0:12:47.880 --> 0:12:51.240
<v Speaker 1>have fewer seizures, So again, a good reason to have

0:12:51.320 --> 0:12:55.720
<v Speaker 1>a placebo control group to compare your test group to. UH.

0:12:56.000 --> 0:12:58.839
<v Speaker 1>Second thing that I thought was interesting, Anthes sites something

0:12:58.880 --> 0:13:01.920
<v Speaker 1>called the hawthorne An effect, which is the idea that

0:13:02.160 --> 0:13:06.120
<v Speaker 1>people often behave differently when they know they're being studied

0:13:06.280 --> 0:13:09.880
<v Speaker 1>or observed. I think the name of this effect comes

0:13:09.960 --> 0:13:15.320
<v Speaker 1>from UH some anecdote about industrial productivity research which found

0:13:15.320 --> 0:13:18.320
<v Speaker 1>all kinds of spurious effects for things like, oh, what

0:13:18.360 --> 0:13:21.000
<v Speaker 1>would happen if we change the lighting in this room?

0:13:21.040 --> 0:13:24.480
<v Speaker 1>Are workers more productive? Oh? It turns out they are.

0:13:25.320 --> 0:13:28.280
<v Speaker 1>But then one ex post facto explanation for all these

0:13:28.320 --> 0:13:31.680
<v Speaker 1>spurious results is just that when employees know that they're

0:13:31.679 --> 0:13:34.719
<v Speaker 1>part of an experiment, they are more productive because they

0:13:34.760 --> 0:13:38.559
<v Speaker 1>know they're being closely scrutinized. Now, this would not apply

0:13:38.640 --> 0:13:42.439
<v Speaker 1>so much to the dogs themselves, but probably to the owners.

0:13:42.440 --> 0:13:45.600
<v Speaker 1>So in the case of the epilepsy studying dogs, Antis

0:13:45.679 --> 0:13:48.440
<v Speaker 1>writes that UH that all of the dogs in the

0:13:48.480 --> 0:13:52.640
<v Speaker 1>study were already on at least one other anti seizure medication,

0:13:53.320 --> 0:13:58.280
<v Speaker 1>and the leaveder acetam was being studied as a supplemental drug.

0:13:58.600 --> 0:14:02.480
<v Speaker 1>So one possibility is that once enrolled in a study,

0:14:02.640 --> 0:14:06.280
<v Speaker 1>pet owners may have been more consistent about making sure

0:14:06.320 --> 0:14:10.600
<v Speaker 1>their dogs got all doses of their pre existing pretested

0:14:10.679 --> 0:14:15.760
<v Speaker 1>epilepsy medication on time. Other possible explanations what about more

0:14:15.800 --> 0:14:19.640
<v Speaker 1>attentive veterinary care. It's possible that while enrolled in the study,

0:14:20.080 --> 0:14:25.120
<v Speaker 1>the animals were we're getting special attention from from vets,

0:14:25.240 --> 0:14:27.680
<v Speaker 1>and this would be partially in line with the explanation

0:14:27.720 --> 0:14:31.680
<v Speaker 1>I was guessing about beforehand, something roughly parallel to the

0:14:31.680 --> 0:14:35.240
<v Speaker 1>effect of a reassuring doctor or nurse. Uh. And I

0:14:35.240 --> 0:14:38.400
<v Speaker 1>think it is a pre existing finding that sometimes gentle

0:14:38.480 --> 0:14:42.400
<v Speaker 1>affectionate attention from humans can help animals like dogs and

0:14:42.480 --> 0:14:47.120
<v Speaker 1>horses show fewer symptoms of discomfort or anxiety and things

0:14:47.120 --> 0:14:51.800
<v Speaker 1>like that. In some cases, you could actually have classical conditioning. Uh. Probably,

0:14:52.360 --> 0:14:54.080
<v Speaker 1>it's hard to see how it would apply to this case,

0:14:54.120 --> 0:14:57.840
<v Speaker 1>but Anti writes quote for example, rats that have regularly

0:14:57.880 --> 0:15:01.880
<v Speaker 1>been getting insulin injections will still experience blood sugar changes

0:15:02.240 --> 0:15:07.160
<v Speaker 1>if they suddenly start receiving saline injections instead. Again, I

0:15:07.480 --> 0:15:10.080
<v Speaker 1>don't think this would apply directly to the epilepsy study,

0:15:10.120 --> 0:15:12.840
<v Speaker 1>but you can imagine it applying to other studies. But

0:15:12.880 --> 0:15:16.040
<v Speaker 1>then the primary explanation favored by anthis in this article

0:15:16.120 --> 0:15:19.960
<v Speaker 1>is something called the caregiver placebo effect or the placebo

0:15:20.040 --> 0:15:25.040
<v Speaker 1>effect by proxy. And this one's pretty straightforward when you

0:15:25.040 --> 0:15:29.440
<v Speaker 1>think about it. Animals can't report or explain their own symptoms.

0:15:30.080 --> 0:15:34.320
<v Speaker 1>Understanding the symptoms experienced by an animal, whether that's something

0:15:34.360 --> 0:15:36.880
<v Speaker 1>like a seizure or whether it's something even more elusive

0:15:36.920 --> 0:15:41.720
<v Speaker 1>like discomfort or pain, that requires human observation of some kind,

0:15:41.800 --> 0:15:46.440
<v Speaker 1>usually reports by the pet owners, and the pet owner

0:15:46.960 --> 0:15:52.240
<v Speaker 1>absolutely can form expectations about improvement based on believing that

0:15:52.280 --> 0:15:54.640
<v Speaker 1>their pet is getting a treatment of some kind, even

0:15:54.640 --> 0:15:57.239
<v Speaker 1>though their their pet might actually be in the placebo

0:15:57.400 --> 0:15:59.880
<v Speaker 1>arm of the study. They don't know that. If it's

0:15:59.880 --> 0:16:02.400
<v Speaker 1>a good if it's a well designed study, uh so

0:16:02.480 --> 0:16:05.560
<v Speaker 1>they think their pet might be receiving the actual drug.

0:16:05.920 --> 0:16:08.800
<v Speaker 1>They form expectations that the pet will be getting better,

0:16:09.240 --> 0:16:12.840
<v Speaker 1>and thus they they interpret everything they see in light

0:16:12.920 --> 0:16:17.480
<v Speaker 1>of those expectations. Because again, seizure frequency in the study

0:16:17.520 --> 0:16:22.880
<v Speaker 1>in question was measured by owner reports, and you might imagine, well, okay,

0:16:23.000 --> 0:16:25.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's it's pretty clear whether a dog is

0:16:25.120 --> 0:16:27.480
<v Speaker 1>having a seizure or not. Well, you might assume that,

0:16:27.520 --> 0:16:30.440
<v Speaker 1>but in fact, pet owners are not always there to

0:16:30.680 --> 0:16:34.640
<v Speaker 1>see a seizure take place. Sometimes you have to interpret

0:16:34.760 --> 0:16:39.400
<v Speaker 1>ambiguous evidence. So the example given in the article is,

0:16:39.680 --> 0:16:42.600
<v Speaker 1>if there's a spot of saliva on the floor, is

0:16:42.680 --> 0:16:45.560
<v Speaker 1>that a sign that the dog had a seizure unobserved

0:16:45.640 --> 0:16:48.160
<v Speaker 1>and drooled on the floor or is that just nothing?

0:16:48.200 --> 0:16:51.680
<v Speaker 1>Did the dog just dripped? Rule? Because they just dripped? Rule. Uh.

0:16:51.720 --> 0:16:54.600
<v Speaker 1>If if the owners believe their dogs are receiving a

0:16:54.680 --> 0:16:58.000
<v Speaker 1>drug that will help reduce the seizures, does that actually

0:16:58.080 --> 0:17:02.120
<v Speaker 1>make the owner less likely to interpret that evidence as

0:17:02.160 --> 0:17:04.600
<v Speaker 1>evidence of a seizure. Yeah, Okay, I see what. I

0:17:04.640 --> 0:17:07.040
<v Speaker 1>see what you're talking about here. Okay, Like I well,

0:17:07.080 --> 0:17:09.679
<v Speaker 1>he's on the medicine, So I guess that's that's not

0:17:09.760 --> 0:17:13.240
<v Speaker 1>a seizure drule, that's just druel. Yeah. The article also

0:17:13.359 --> 0:17:16.760
<v Speaker 1>cites a veterinary surgeon at the University of Minnesota named

0:17:16.840 --> 0:17:20.520
<v Speaker 1>Michael Consimius who gives a really interesting example from a

0:17:20.560 --> 0:17:25.280
<v Speaker 1>different study. This was a study on anti inflammatory treatments

0:17:25.280 --> 0:17:28.280
<v Speaker 1>for arthritis in dogs, and they did a trial that

0:17:28.359 --> 0:17:33.320
<v Speaker 1>involved both subjective and objective measurements of how well this

0:17:33.400 --> 0:17:38.399
<v Speaker 1>anti inflammatory was doing to reduce reduce arthritic pain in

0:17:38.440 --> 0:17:42.600
<v Speaker 1>the limbs, and so the subjective measure was you would

0:17:42.600 --> 0:17:46.200
<v Speaker 1>ask both pet owners and veterinarians to observe the dog

0:17:46.640 --> 0:17:48.719
<v Speaker 1>and rate how much pain they seem to be in.

0:17:49.280 --> 0:17:52.280
<v Speaker 1>And then there were also objective measures, and this would

0:17:52.320 --> 0:17:55.560
<v Speaker 1>be having the dog walk on a on a complicated

0:17:55.600 --> 0:17:59.560
<v Speaker 1>setup of digital scales to determine how much weight the

0:17:59.600 --> 0:18:02.080
<v Speaker 1>dogs were putting on each limb while walking, because if

0:18:02.080 --> 0:18:03.960
<v Speaker 1>the dog, if one of the dog's limbs is in pain,

0:18:04.280 --> 0:18:06.720
<v Speaker 1>they will tend to put less weight on that limb.

0:18:07.200 --> 0:18:10.560
<v Speaker 1>And this study found conflicts between the subjective measures and

0:18:10.600 --> 0:18:14.520
<v Speaker 1>the objective measures. So in the placebo group, owners and

0:18:14.680 --> 0:18:17.439
<v Speaker 1>vets who thought the dog might be receiving the drug

0:18:17.880 --> 0:18:21.240
<v Speaker 1>but actually they were just getting a placebo, reported improvements,

0:18:21.760 --> 0:18:25.719
<v Speaker 1>but the objective measure, the scales did not show improvements.

0:18:25.800 --> 0:18:29.200
<v Speaker 1>So the in the placebo group they're getting a fake treatment.

0:18:29.440 --> 0:18:32.120
<v Speaker 1>The owners and the veterinarians are like, yeah, we think

0:18:32.160 --> 0:18:34.520
<v Speaker 1>the dog is doing better, but when you put them

0:18:34.520 --> 0:18:37.600
<v Speaker 1>on the scales, they're still not putting weight on that limb.

0:18:37.880 --> 0:18:42.000
<v Speaker 1>So the dog itself is not affected by receiving the placebo,

0:18:42.080 --> 0:18:46.840
<v Speaker 1>but the human observers are interestingly even the veterinarians. This

0:18:46.880 --> 0:18:49.760
<v Speaker 1>is interesting because when we first raised the question about

0:18:49.840 --> 0:18:54.000
<v Speaker 1>BOTHO effected animals and then when you brought up dogs here,

0:18:54.240 --> 0:18:57.600
<v Speaker 1>my first thought was, well, dogs are are highly social animals,

0:18:58.080 --> 0:19:00.440
<v Speaker 1>so perhaps there is some sort of social by namic

0:19:01.000 --> 0:19:04.719
<v Speaker 1>between the way that they're human is treating them, like

0:19:04.760 --> 0:19:06.800
<v Speaker 1>maybe it has to do lee, and maybe it has

0:19:06.880 --> 0:19:08.920
<v Speaker 1>to do with with pill pockets, like oh, I'm getting

0:19:08.960 --> 0:19:11.800
<v Speaker 1>more snacks or I'm getting more attention or something like that.

0:19:11.840 --> 0:19:13.600
<v Speaker 1>And then that of course would be something that would

0:19:13.640 --> 0:19:18.280
<v Speaker 1>not seem to readily translate into the livestock world. But

0:19:18.920 --> 0:19:21.840
<v Speaker 1>what we're looking at here these are examples that, if

0:19:21.880 --> 0:19:25.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm not mistaken, would translate rather readily into the world

0:19:25.800 --> 0:19:28.960
<v Speaker 1>of caring for livestock. Yeah, because it's about the human observers,

0:19:29.000 --> 0:19:32.119
<v Speaker 1>like the cow whatever is making it into these reports

0:19:32.160 --> 0:19:35.680
<v Speaker 1>that are in like anthropological texts or you know, folklore

0:19:35.760 --> 0:19:39.280
<v Speaker 1>journals or whatever. The cow doesn't actually get to write

0:19:39.280 --> 0:19:42.159
<v Speaker 1>that report that's made by humans, and it's usually going

0:19:42.200 --> 0:19:44.520
<v Speaker 1>to be like the farmers saying, yeah, my cow got

0:19:44.560 --> 0:19:47.639
<v Speaker 1>better or something like that. And they could well be

0:19:47.680 --> 0:19:52.399
<v Speaker 1>affected by caregiver placebo effect. They form expectations of efficacy,

0:19:52.440 --> 0:19:56.800
<v Speaker 1>and they interpret what they see through that lens. Another

0:19:56.840 --> 0:19:59.800
<v Speaker 1>thing is that this article reports how sometimes animal pain

0:20:00.160 --> 0:20:04.679
<v Speaker 1>is observable to one human onlooker but not to another. Again,

0:20:04.720 --> 0:20:08.240
<v Speaker 1>just based on expectations, like our emotional biases are very

0:20:08.320 --> 0:20:10.920
<v Speaker 1>strong in this area. And and one example given would

0:20:10.920 --> 0:20:13.200
<v Speaker 1>be a you know, a pet owner brings an animal

0:20:13.200 --> 0:20:16.000
<v Speaker 1>into the vet and it was in pain before, and

0:20:16.080 --> 0:20:19.159
<v Speaker 1>the vet observes that the animal does still appear to

0:20:19.160 --> 0:20:21.879
<v Speaker 1>be in pain, but the owner says, no, no, no,

0:20:22.000 --> 0:20:24.679
<v Speaker 1>he's not he's in he's much better now. I've been

0:20:24.720 --> 0:20:28.800
<v Speaker 1>giving him these homeopathic treatments I found. And you know,

0:20:28.840 --> 0:20:31.520
<v Speaker 1>that's a mix of things. Like the pet owner, they

0:20:31.560 --> 0:20:34.639
<v Speaker 1>love their pet, so they desire to believe that the

0:20:34.680 --> 0:20:37.800
<v Speaker 1>beloved animal is doing better. And then on top of that,

0:20:37.840 --> 0:20:41.000
<v Speaker 1>you could have like a choice supportive bias bias too,

0:20:41.160 --> 0:20:44.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, where you interpret reality in a way that

0:20:44.680 --> 0:20:47.520
<v Speaker 1>that supports the idea that what you have decided to

0:20:47.560 --> 0:20:51.199
<v Speaker 1>do was the right decision. So the choice supportive bias

0:20:51.240 --> 0:20:54.639
<v Speaker 1>says your selected intervention is working. And that may be

0:20:55.119 --> 0:20:58.560
<v Speaker 1>a magical treatment or a or a non science based

0:20:58.920 --> 0:21:02.800
<v Speaker 1>intervention like homeopathy or something, and that can blind you too.

0:21:02.920 --> 0:21:07.560
<v Speaker 1>Signs of distress that other unbiased onlookers could see. Yeah. Yeah,

0:21:07.600 --> 0:21:10.159
<v Speaker 1>because because at least you feel like you're doing something

0:21:10.200 --> 0:21:12.840
<v Speaker 1>in those cases, and or you're consultant. You may be

0:21:12.920 --> 0:21:16.280
<v Speaker 1>consulting experts in the local community that are also assuring

0:21:16.320 --> 0:21:17.880
<v Speaker 1>you like, yeah, this is the way to go, this

0:21:17.960 --> 0:21:21.199
<v Speaker 1>is what will will get results. Yeah. And I think

0:21:21.240 --> 0:21:23.360
<v Speaker 1>the important thing to stress here is that this occurs.

0:21:23.600 --> 0:21:26.199
<v Speaker 1>You don't have to be like an uncaring you know,

0:21:26.400 --> 0:21:29.320
<v Speaker 1>companion to to your non human animal of whatever type.

0:21:29.320 --> 0:21:32.360
<v Speaker 1>It is like you can care very much about their

0:21:32.400 --> 0:21:34.879
<v Speaker 1>well being and have this kind of bias. It's not

0:21:34.920 --> 0:21:38.240
<v Speaker 1>like a result of being cold and unfeeling and cruel.

0:21:38.800 --> 0:21:40.760
<v Speaker 1>So just a couple of final notes on this article.

0:21:40.800 --> 0:21:43.320
<v Speaker 1>One is just a big takeaway is you should be

0:21:43.359 --> 0:21:46.439
<v Speaker 1>careful when observing the symptoms of of a non human animal,

0:21:46.480 --> 0:21:49.439
<v Speaker 1>of a pet or whatever, uh, not to let these

0:21:49.520 --> 0:21:52.920
<v Speaker 1>kinds of biases prevent you from finding the most effective

0:21:52.920 --> 0:21:56.160
<v Speaker 1>treatment or solution. You know, whenever possible, try to look

0:21:56.200 --> 0:22:02.160
<v Speaker 1>for objective pieces of behavioral evidence that remove your subjective

0:22:02.200 --> 0:22:05.720
<v Speaker 1>evaluation from things. And then the other thing is about

0:22:05.720 --> 0:22:10.359
<v Speaker 1>the standards of evidence within veterinary medicine. Unfortunately, the history

0:22:10.400 --> 0:22:15.200
<v Speaker 1>of veterinary studies has included fewer double blind, placebo controlled

0:22:15.200 --> 0:22:18.400
<v Speaker 1>trials than human medicine. Because again, for a long time,

0:22:18.440 --> 0:22:21.600
<v Speaker 1>nobody really thought placebo effect would come into play in

0:22:21.600 --> 0:22:24.320
<v Speaker 1>a major way in veterinary medicine. But it looks like,

0:22:24.359 --> 0:22:27.120
<v Speaker 1>at least in some cases, it really does, especially when

0:22:27.160 --> 0:22:31.520
<v Speaker 1>that reported outcomes are based on owner's perceptions. And so

0:22:31.640 --> 0:22:35.240
<v Speaker 1>this is changing and more more evidentiary standards like this

0:22:35.320 --> 0:22:38.960
<v Speaker 1>are being introduced into veterinary medicine. But it may mean

0:22:39.000 --> 0:22:42.640
<v Speaker 1>that the evaluation of the true efficacy of veterinary medicine

0:22:42.720 --> 0:22:45.880
<v Speaker 1>has in some cases, especially when the basis is older,

0:22:46.560 --> 0:22:49.320
<v Speaker 1>maybe on a lower standard of evidence than in human

0:22:49.400 --> 0:22:53.320
<v Speaker 1>drug trials. But fortunately that that is changing. But anyway,

0:22:53.400 --> 0:22:56.120
<v Speaker 1>so I'm bringing all this back to thoughts about how

0:22:56.160 --> 0:22:58.639
<v Speaker 1>this could relate to like a Scottish farmer in the

0:22:58.680 --> 0:23:02.680
<v Speaker 1>seventeenth century who believes that his his cow is sick

0:23:02.800 --> 0:23:05.919
<v Speaker 1>or his horse is sick because it has been elf shot,

0:23:05.960 --> 0:23:08.080
<v Speaker 1>it has been you know, hit by a ferry arrow

0:23:08.520 --> 0:23:11.760
<v Speaker 1>and summon someone to provide a magical cure that maybe

0:23:11.760 --> 0:23:16.800
<v Speaker 1>involves neolithic flints or egg mixed with gunpowder and healing

0:23:16.840 --> 0:23:19.239
<v Speaker 1>their cow I I wonder how it relates to that.

0:23:19.280 --> 0:23:22.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I would guess that the specifically that last

0:23:22.920 --> 0:23:25.680
<v Speaker 1>when the caregiver placebo effect would would be a major

0:23:25.760 --> 0:23:28.480
<v Speaker 1>factor here. Yeah, yeah, I think so that seems to

0:23:28.480 --> 0:23:30.880
<v Speaker 1>be the That would seem to be the key. Though.

0:23:30.920 --> 0:23:33.879
<v Speaker 1>It also makes me wonder about the idea of a

0:23:34.200 --> 0:23:36.280
<v Speaker 1>of an inverse thing. This is not addressed in the

0:23:36.400 --> 0:23:40.320
<v Speaker 1>article at all, but a a caregiver no sebo effect.

0:23:40.640 --> 0:23:43.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it makes me wonder how you could have

0:23:44.240 --> 0:23:48.800
<v Speaker 1>anxieties or beliefs about danger, other kinds of things taking

0:23:48.840 --> 0:23:52.520
<v Speaker 1>place purely within the mind of the animal caregiver that

0:23:52.680 --> 0:23:57.800
<v Speaker 1>give rise to spurious diagnoses of of illness or symptoms

0:23:57.800 --> 0:24:00.520
<v Speaker 1>in the animal. Like what if actually the cow was fine.

0:24:01.080 --> 0:24:04.960
<v Speaker 1>The farmer just gets freaked out about the idea that, oh, no,

0:24:05.160 --> 0:24:07.880
<v Speaker 1>something bad is happening to my cow for some reason,

0:24:08.400 --> 0:24:12.480
<v Speaker 1>and and that brings on the illusion of distress, which

0:24:12.560 --> 0:24:15.119
<v Speaker 1>could then be treated by some kind of magical intervention,

0:24:15.560 --> 0:24:18.439
<v Speaker 1>and then what do you know of the cow's fine afterwards? Yeah.

0:24:18.440 --> 0:24:22.160
<v Speaker 1>This is especially possible given some of the the linked

0:24:22.400 --> 0:24:26.000
<v Speaker 1>or perceived to be linked activities to elf shot, the

0:24:26.040 --> 0:24:30.240
<v Speaker 1>cases where humans did something they shouldn't have to attract

0:24:30.359 --> 0:24:33.240
<v Speaker 1>the attention of the elves, be it, you know, trumping

0:24:33.240 --> 0:24:37.280
<v Speaker 1>on sacred ground, cutting down of a sacred tree, um

0:24:37.440 --> 0:24:41.480
<v Speaker 1>or or or so something of this nature, um or

0:24:41.520 --> 0:24:45.159
<v Speaker 1>even just the finding of the elf ere like this

0:24:45.240 --> 0:24:48.399
<v Speaker 1>was curious. I was out with my cattle and I

0:24:48.520 --> 0:24:51.760
<v Speaker 1>found this artifact on the ground. It's clearly an artifact

0:24:51.760 --> 0:24:54.439
<v Speaker 1>of the elves. I better check on my cattle and

0:24:54.440 --> 0:24:57.280
<v Speaker 1>see how they're doing. Oh, this one's not doing too well.

0:24:57.480 --> 0:24:59.919
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, I didn't make that connection with the picking

0:25:00.040 --> 0:25:06.680
<v Speaker 1>up of the flint, but yeah, that makes sense. Thank you,

0:25:06.880 --> 0:25:10.360
<v Speaker 1>Thank you. Now, there was a paper we talked about

0:25:10.400 --> 0:25:12.800
<v Speaker 1>a little bit in the previous episode that I wanted

0:25:12.840 --> 0:25:15.159
<v Speaker 1>to come back to and just mention a couple of

0:25:15.200 --> 0:25:19.240
<v Speaker 1>more interesting little stories from uh. It was that paper

0:25:19.280 --> 0:25:22.520
<v Speaker 1>called elf Shot Cattle by Thomas Davidson that was published

0:25:22.520 --> 0:25:26.159
<v Speaker 1>in the journal Antiquity in nineteen fifty six. Remember, this

0:25:26.200 --> 0:25:27.959
<v Speaker 1>is the one that was collecting a lot of those

0:25:28.160 --> 0:25:31.600
<v Speaker 1>reports about elf shot. One of the things that caught

0:25:31.640 --> 0:25:36.480
<v Speaker 1>my attention was the claim that a lot of times

0:25:36.520 --> 0:25:40.720
<v Speaker 1>these injuries from elf shot are not inflicted directly by

0:25:40.800 --> 0:25:45.520
<v Speaker 1>fairies or elves themselves. Davidson cites an author named Luid

0:25:46.000 --> 0:25:48.760
<v Speaker 1>writing that there's a belief among some that fairies have

0:25:48.880 --> 0:25:53.400
<v Speaker 1>to use humans as intermediaries in order to inflict these injuries,

0:25:54.119 --> 0:25:58.280
<v Speaker 1>since the fairies have little power to cause direct physical

0:25:58.320 --> 0:26:03.200
<v Speaker 1>injury to animal bodies them selves. So sometimes these stories

0:26:03.200 --> 0:26:05.960
<v Speaker 1>say humans are like sucked up into the air by

0:26:06.000 --> 0:26:10.040
<v Speaker 1>fairies and then given fairy weapons and then forced to

0:26:10.200 --> 0:26:14.600
<v Speaker 1>shoot at men or cattle. M So okay, so sort

0:26:14.600 --> 0:26:17.800
<v Speaker 1>of possession going on here. Yeah. One example of this

0:26:17.960 --> 0:26:21.439
<v Speaker 1>is a story called the Tale of Black Donald of

0:26:21.600 --> 0:26:25.800
<v Speaker 1>the Fairy Throng Uh. And this is a story where

0:26:25.840 --> 0:26:28.440
<v Speaker 1>there's this guy named Donald and he's out plowing. He's

0:26:28.440 --> 0:26:31.719
<v Speaker 1>plowing the land, he's working in the furrows, and this

0:26:31.800 --> 0:26:34.080
<v Speaker 1>is on the Aisle of Tyree, which is off the

0:26:34.440 --> 0:26:38.320
<v Speaker 1>coast of Scotland. And Donald's he's plowing and he gets

0:26:38.640 --> 0:26:42.840
<v Speaker 1>uh sucked up by a fairy convoy and uh, and

0:26:42.880 --> 0:26:46.399
<v Speaker 1>then they force him to drop an arrow from the

0:26:46.400 --> 0:26:50.080
<v Speaker 1>sky that kills a speckled cow. And this actually connects

0:26:50.119 --> 0:26:54.080
<v Speaker 1>with some of the critical stuff I was reading about

0:26:54.320 --> 0:26:56.679
<v Speaker 1>the elf shot tradition, which says that actually in a

0:26:56.680 --> 0:26:59.800
<v Speaker 1>lot of these stories, it is being alleger that it's

0:26:59.840 --> 0:27:03.359
<v Speaker 1>he whoman's who are doing the inflicting, like witches or

0:27:03.440 --> 0:27:07.800
<v Speaker 1>something who are inflicting damage with these weapons rather than

0:27:07.840 --> 0:27:11.200
<v Speaker 1>elves directly. Interesting and in the end this it gets

0:27:11.240 --> 0:27:14.000
<v Speaker 1>into a common trope in many cultures of the of

0:27:14.080 --> 0:27:17.520
<v Speaker 1>sort of like the outsider within somebody within the community,

0:27:17.600 --> 0:27:19.720
<v Speaker 1>either somebody from outside the community or somebody within the

0:27:19.760 --> 0:27:24.680
<v Speaker 1>community that has been corrupted somehow. Yeah. Yeah, one thing

0:27:24.720 --> 0:27:27.360
<v Speaker 1>I had to mention just because it was funny. There

0:27:27.480 --> 0:27:30.320
<v Speaker 1>there's a long section of this paper that talks about

0:27:30.600 --> 0:27:33.440
<v Speaker 1>alleged cures for elf shot, and one is a recorded

0:27:33.440 --> 0:27:36.719
<v Speaker 1>anecdote of a wise woman curing a cow in the

0:27:36.720 --> 0:27:42.160
<v Speaker 1>Shetlands by asking the crofter, the farmer, to bring her

0:27:42.240 --> 0:27:45.600
<v Speaker 1>a Bible, and he brings the Bible, and she rips

0:27:45.640 --> 0:27:48.320
<v Speaker 1>pages out of the Bible and balls them up into

0:27:48.320 --> 0:27:51.680
<v Speaker 1>a pellet and then crams the Bible page pellet into

0:27:51.720 --> 0:27:54.920
<v Speaker 1>a dimple in the cow's skin. Then there's another one

0:27:55.160 --> 0:27:58.360
<v Speaker 1>I have to share because it involves crabs and and

0:27:59.000 --> 0:28:01.840
<v Speaker 1>raises a mr for me that I cannot solve. So

0:28:02.000 --> 0:28:04.880
<v Speaker 1>maybe the listeners have some input on this. So this

0:28:04.960 --> 0:28:08.240
<v Speaker 1>is from a source Davidson sites called Shetland folklore. This

0:28:08.359 --> 0:28:11.480
<v Speaker 1>is a book by Spence, and I'm going to read

0:28:11.480 --> 0:28:14.359
<v Speaker 1>directly from Davidson summary here. Oh, I'm sorry, this is

0:28:14.400 --> 0:28:19.399
<v Speaker 1>still about traditions in the Shetlands. Quote. A variant prescription

0:28:19.480 --> 0:28:23.000
<v Speaker 1>from the same area directs the wise woman to take tar,

0:28:23.560 --> 0:28:29.159
<v Speaker 1>a needle, a bible, a fire brand, and some fairy crabs.

0:28:29.960 --> 0:28:34.040
<v Speaker 1>Waving the burning brand, she walked three times witter shans

0:28:34.160 --> 0:28:38.200
<v Speaker 1>round the cow. That means counterclockwise three times witter shans

0:28:38.240 --> 0:28:42.000
<v Speaker 1>round the cow, jabbing the animal with the needle, waving

0:28:42.040 --> 0:28:45.320
<v Speaker 1>a leaf of the Bible over its back, and muttering

0:28:45.360 --> 0:28:49.680
<v Speaker 1>an incantation. The firebrand was placed in a pot of

0:28:49.760 --> 0:28:53.080
<v Speaker 1>tar and set at the cow's head so the fumes

0:28:53.120 --> 0:28:56.400
<v Speaker 1>would make her cough. She was then given the fairy

0:28:56.480 --> 0:29:00.440
<v Speaker 1>crabs to eat alive. The ashes of the fire brand

0:29:00.480 --> 0:29:03.800
<v Speaker 1>were later mixed with the tar into three pills, which

0:29:03.840 --> 0:29:08.760
<v Speaker 1>were administered to the animal on three successive mornings. What

0:29:09.600 --> 0:29:13.560
<v Speaker 1>so involves eating the fairy crabs alive, it says she,

0:29:13.760 --> 0:29:16.800
<v Speaker 1>And I'm sorry, I'm not sure if that means the

0:29:17.000 --> 0:29:20.840
<v Speaker 1>cow or the wise woman. I think that means the cow. Yeah,

0:29:20.920 --> 0:29:24.560
<v Speaker 1>I remember reading this in the source during the initial

0:29:24.640 --> 0:29:27.360
<v Speaker 1>research phase. And I could not figure out what fairy

0:29:27.360 --> 0:29:31.440
<v Speaker 1>crabs where. I was like, yeah, it was I was trying,

0:29:31.520 --> 0:29:33.800
<v Speaker 1>my mind was struggling to form. I was just imagining

0:29:33.800 --> 0:29:36.600
<v Speaker 1>like a glowing blue crab. I was confused too, and

0:29:36.760 --> 0:29:39.000
<v Speaker 1>I tried to look this up. There is an animal

0:29:39.440 --> 0:29:42.160
<v Speaker 1>called a fairy crab, you can see it if you

0:29:42.200 --> 0:29:45.440
<v Speaker 1>google that phrase. But it's clearly not what this is

0:29:45.480 --> 0:29:49.959
<v Speaker 1>referring to, because it's a species of squat lobster called

0:29:50.520 --> 0:29:55.880
<v Speaker 1>the scientific name is Laurea gianni and it's native to

0:29:55.920 --> 0:29:58.440
<v Speaker 1>the Pacific. It's found like off the coast of Australia

0:29:58.520 --> 0:30:01.800
<v Speaker 1>and UH and Indonesia. I think, so this is clearly

0:30:01.840 --> 0:30:05.360
<v Speaker 1>not what they're talking about in the Shetlands. And I

0:30:05.440 --> 0:30:07.880
<v Speaker 1>was trying to find more information and I just could not.

0:30:07.960 --> 0:30:10.880
<v Speaker 1>So I wonder if this refers to I don't know,

0:30:10.920 --> 0:30:14.840
<v Speaker 1>if this is a local Shetland name for a certain

0:30:14.840 --> 0:30:17.720
<v Speaker 1>type of animal, like an actual crab or some type

0:30:17.720 --> 0:30:21.640
<v Speaker 1>of insect or something. I really have no idea. Yeah,

0:30:21.680 --> 0:30:23.760
<v Speaker 1>I can imagine it going in different directions, some sort

0:30:23.800 --> 0:30:27.400
<v Speaker 1>of novel crab that's found on the shore or or

0:30:27.480 --> 0:30:30.320
<v Speaker 1>turned up in nets, or or indeed something that is

0:30:30.360 --> 0:30:34.400
<v Speaker 1>found uh. You know, in in streams, or is not

0:30:34.480 --> 0:30:36.840
<v Speaker 1>a crab at all, but some sort of an insect

0:30:36.880 --> 0:30:40.080
<v Speaker 1>with some sort of folk medicine properties to it. Or

0:30:40.200 --> 0:30:42.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean certainly we have examples in in plenty of

0:30:42.960 --> 0:30:45.800
<v Speaker 1>cultures where something is named after an animal, but it's

0:30:45.800 --> 0:30:47.720
<v Speaker 1>not itself an animal. It could be you know, you

0:30:47.960 --> 0:30:50.760
<v Speaker 1>can imagine a situation where the fairy crab is actually

0:30:50.800 --> 0:30:53.600
<v Speaker 1>some sort of a root, uh something into that effect.

0:30:53.680 --> 0:30:55.520
<v Speaker 1>So there's so many different directions that could go in

0:30:55.640 --> 0:30:58.840
<v Speaker 1>not not knowing exactly what this is referring to. Well,

0:30:58.840 --> 0:31:01.080
<v Speaker 1>hey listeners, if you've got inside on this, you know

0:31:01.120 --> 0:31:04.960
<v Speaker 1>what the fairy crabs are, right in. One last subject

0:31:04.960 --> 0:31:09.240
<v Speaker 1>that Davidson brings up with respect to elf shot is

0:31:09.360 --> 0:31:15.360
<v Speaker 1>the idea of of curved plow furrows and ridges in

0:31:15.480 --> 0:31:20.680
<v Speaker 1>order to quote Wander the fairy, which I found so interesting.

0:31:20.720 --> 0:31:23.160
<v Speaker 1>It's the idea that if you you go throughout Scotland

0:31:23.200 --> 0:31:26.160
<v Speaker 1>and you look at some old cultivated fields, you'll find,

0:31:26.280 --> 0:31:29.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, these places that are uh, they're they're dug

0:31:29.760 --> 0:31:33.640
<v Speaker 1>with a what's known as like a ridge and furrow system,

0:31:33.680 --> 0:31:36.640
<v Speaker 1>So you'll see a series of basically you know, lines

0:31:36.720 --> 0:31:39.040
<v Speaker 1>where like you'd have a plowed area and then like

0:31:39.080 --> 0:31:41.719
<v Speaker 1>a sort of ridge of of moved earth piled up

0:31:41.720 --> 0:31:45.120
<v Speaker 1>in between them. And an interesting thing about a lot

0:31:45.200 --> 0:31:48.680
<v Speaker 1>of these is they are created with with so that

0:31:48.760 --> 0:31:51.960
<v Speaker 1>the ridges and the furrows are not straight lines, but

0:31:52.080 --> 0:31:56.920
<v Speaker 1>are curved or crooked or s shaped even. And it

0:31:57.000 --> 0:32:01.160
<v Speaker 1>is believed by some that the purpose of this is

0:32:01.200 --> 0:32:06.000
<v Speaker 1>to confuse or quote wander the ferry to uh, to

0:32:06.360 --> 0:32:09.120
<v Speaker 1>maybe lead the ferry off course or lead the elf

0:32:09.240 --> 0:32:11.520
<v Speaker 1>off course. This is not the only system, by the way,

0:32:11.520 --> 0:32:14.640
<v Speaker 1>that would use this, Like Davidson notes that a lot

0:32:14.680 --> 0:32:19.400
<v Speaker 1>of amulets that are designed for protection against fairies have

0:32:20.360 --> 0:32:23.600
<v Speaker 1>a rays of kind of spiral patterns or can you know,

0:32:23.800 --> 0:32:27.920
<v Speaker 1>complex whirls within them, or labyrinths or something, and that

0:32:28.080 --> 0:32:32.560
<v Speaker 1>this is designed to confuse the evil spirits, to kind

0:32:32.560 --> 0:32:35.720
<v Speaker 1>of send them on a on a maze like journey

0:32:35.760 --> 0:32:38.480
<v Speaker 1>that will lead them astray and keep them from harming you.

0:32:38.800 --> 0:32:41.480
<v Speaker 1>These If if you haven't seen these ridgin furrow features,

0:32:41.920 --> 0:32:44.080
<v Speaker 1>definitely look them up to do an image search, because

0:32:44.080 --> 0:32:47.680
<v Speaker 1>you can see lots of wonderful aerial photographs of this

0:32:47.960 --> 0:32:50.080
<v Speaker 1>sort of thing. And yeah, you can sort of imagine

0:32:50.120 --> 0:32:54.840
<v Speaker 1>the trail of the of the elf going astray here. Oh,

0:32:54.920 --> 0:32:56.840
<v Speaker 1>some of the ones you're looking at are the curved ones,

0:32:56.880 --> 0:32:59.360
<v Speaker 1>because some are just straight, but others some are just straight.

0:32:59.440 --> 0:33:01.960
<v Speaker 1>But I was looking at one in particular here where

0:33:02.000 --> 0:33:03.920
<v Speaker 1>you do see you kind of see a mix in

0:33:03.960 --> 0:33:06.480
<v Speaker 1>this particular one. You see the different areas of land

0:33:06.560 --> 0:33:10.040
<v Speaker 1>and definite curves in some areas where and one kind

0:33:10.040 --> 0:33:12.120
<v Speaker 1>of has like almost like a fern look because you

0:33:12.120 --> 0:33:14.560
<v Speaker 1>have the line going down the middle and you have

0:33:14.680 --> 0:33:17.880
<v Speaker 1>some like like different wavings on each side. So the

0:33:17.920 --> 0:33:21.520
<v Speaker 1>magical understanding here again is that this, well, it could

0:33:21.520 --> 0:33:24.040
<v Speaker 1>throw fairies off just generally because you know, you you

0:33:24.320 --> 0:33:27.080
<v Speaker 1>make twisting paths in order to confuse evil spirits. But

0:33:27.080 --> 0:33:29.560
<v Speaker 1>the other thing would be it doesn't allow them to

0:33:29.640 --> 0:33:32.840
<v Speaker 1>get a clear straight line shot at the cattle, like

0:33:32.880 --> 0:33:35.720
<v Speaker 1>at the oxen that you're using to plow the field. Yeah,

0:33:35.760 --> 0:33:38.080
<v Speaker 1>this is strange, Like this idea of the elf is

0:33:38.120 --> 0:33:41.040
<v Speaker 1>kind of like this. Uh, you know, I guess you

0:33:41.120 --> 0:33:44.080
<v Speaker 1>look at different folklore systems, it's like you want to

0:33:44.120 --> 0:33:48.120
<v Speaker 1>avoid doing things that draw attention to yourself. You know,

0:33:48.280 --> 0:33:51.120
<v Speaker 1>we definitely see that with the elf and fairy folk traditions,

0:33:51.160 --> 0:33:53.480
<v Speaker 1>and in this part of the world with the wearing

0:33:53.520 --> 0:33:55.640
<v Speaker 1>of green, which we've discussed before. Don't wear the green

0:33:55.720 --> 0:33:57.960
<v Speaker 1>that's the color of the elves or the fairies. They'll

0:33:57.960 --> 0:34:00.640
<v Speaker 1>come at you. You also see that with editions of

0:34:00.720 --> 0:34:03.520
<v Speaker 1>the Evil Eye in the Middle East, where there are

0:34:03.600 --> 0:34:07.200
<v Speaker 1>various things like you should not do because this invisible

0:34:07.280 --> 0:34:10.239
<v Speaker 1>nefarious forces out there in the world, and you do

0:34:10.320 --> 0:34:13.200
<v Speaker 1>not want it aware of your presence or your fortune.

0:34:13.480 --> 0:34:16.399
<v Speaker 1>So you don't. Don't, don't get on its radar, don't

0:34:16.440 --> 0:34:19.840
<v Speaker 1>have direct lines leading to you, be that line something

0:34:19.920 --> 0:34:22.520
<v Speaker 1>like you know, you're shouting about how beautiful your child is.

0:34:23.160 --> 0:34:24.400
<v Speaker 1>Um you know, in the case of some of the

0:34:24.640 --> 0:34:28.279
<v Speaker 1>Evil Eye traditions in particularly in Judaism, I remember hearing

0:34:28.280 --> 0:34:31.799
<v Speaker 1>about reading about um or or in this case, like

0:34:31.840 --> 0:34:35.839
<v Speaker 1>a physical line through the altered landscape. I think this

0:34:35.960 --> 0:34:38.760
<v Speaker 1>type of belief is still present even in like modern

0:34:38.800 --> 0:34:41.880
<v Speaker 1>day and Christianity. Like I remember when I was a

0:34:41.960 --> 0:34:45.080
<v Speaker 1>kid hearing about the dangers of playing with a weigia board,

0:34:45.480 --> 0:34:49.200
<v Speaker 1>and the idea was it attracts demonic attention. I mean,

0:34:49.280 --> 0:34:51.839
<v Speaker 1>it's literally like the it's it's like when you play

0:34:51.840 --> 0:34:54.600
<v Speaker 1>with a wegia board. It's not so much something about

0:34:54.600 --> 0:34:56.880
<v Speaker 1>the board as evil, but it. It's sort of like

0:34:56.920 --> 0:35:01.279
<v Speaker 1>puts up a beacon to demons that says, hey, I'm available. Uh,

0:35:01.320 --> 0:35:04.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, pay attention to me, and they will hone

0:35:04.120 --> 0:35:07.040
<v Speaker 1>in on you because you have done that. Yeah. Oh.

0:35:07.080 --> 0:35:10.319
<v Speaker 1>In quick note, I mentioned Judaism and the evil eye

0:35:10.400 --> 0:35:12.840
<v Speaker 1>and so forth. The evil eyes not necessarily like a

0:35:12.880 --> 0:35:15.040
<v Speaker 1>part of Judaism. I don't want to imply that, but

0:35:15.120 --> 0:35:17.200
<v Speaker 1>it is something that is sort of in the folklore

0:35:17.320 --> 0:35:20.160
<v Speaker 1>traditions of various people in the Middle East, including you'll

0:35:20.160 --> 0:35:23.200
<v Speaker 1>see that in Judaic culture. Yeah. And certainly we see

0:35:23.239 --> 0:35:25.160
<v Speaker 1>similar site case with with this here because we have

0:35:25.200 --> 0:35:27.560
<v Speaker 1>people who are discussing that have taken you know, that

0:35:27.640 --> 0:35:31.240
<v Speaker 1>have converted to Christianity, and that they're still they're still

0:35:31.800 --> 0:35:35.480
<v Speaker 1>practicing beliefs, they're still engaging in belief of the elves,

0:35:35.640 --> 0:35:38.520
<v Speaker 1>but they're also incorporating in some of these Christian traditions

0:35:38.560 --> 0:35:41.360
<v Speaker 1>like well, maybe maybe you know, wat up a Bible

0:35:41.840 --> 0:35:44.279
<v Speaker 1>page and stick it into that furrow in the cow

0:35:44.360 --> 0:35:47.160
<v Speaker 1>and that will help to this is this next thing

0:35:47.239 --> 0:35:49.680
<v Speaker 1>is not really addressed in Davidson, but I was wondering

0:35:49.719 --> 0:35:52.759
<v Speaker 1>about this, uh, because I was reading about the ridge

0:35:52.760 --> 0:35:57.640
<v Speaker 1>and furrow system elsewhere after after reading this passage from Davidson,

0:35:57.680 --> 0:36:02.360
<v Speaker 1>and it seems to me that sometime the strips that

0:36:02.400 --> 0:36:06.560
<v Speaker 1>are plowed in this system are curved for totally mundane

0:36:06.640 --> 0:36:10.279
<v Speaker 1>reasons that have nothing to do with magical beliefs. I

0:36:10.360 --> 0:36:13.399
<v Speaker 1>think that they're they're often curved just because of Uh.

0:36:13.600 --> 0:36:17.040
<v Speaker 1>It was a sort of necessary consequence of the types

0:36:17.120 --> 0:36:20.040
<v Speaker 1>of plow rigging and and oxen pulling teams that they

0:36:20.120 --> 0:36:22.480
<v Speaker 1>used at the time. They would lead to a farrow

0:36:22.600 --> 0:36:25.120
<v Speaker 1>or ridge being kind of like curved off at each

0:36:25.280 --> 0:36:27.920
<v Speaker 1>end every time the team turned around to make a

0:36:27.920 --> 0:36:32.360
<v Speaker 1>new line. Uh. And that makes me wonder if something

0:36:32.520 --> 0:36:37.799
<v Speaker 1>like twisting twisting in these rows could have originally been

0:36:37.880 --> 0:36:41.960
<v Speaker 1>a totally mundane thing that somebody saw and then in

0:36:42.040 --> 0:36:45.480
<v Speaker 1>trying to explain why it was like that without understanding it,

0:36:45.760 --> 0:36:49.600
<v Speaker 1>they came up with this explanation about confusing the ferries

0:36:49.960 --> 0:36:53.120
<v Speaker 1>and then afterwards did did it like that on purpose?

0:36:53.560 --> 0:36:56.640
<v Speaker 1>It's like like somebody like that. The landowner whoever comes

0:36:56.640 --> 0:36:59.000
<v Speaker 1>out to check on the work is like, Dale, what's

0:36:59.000 --> 0:37:01.040
<v Speaker 1>going on with these ridges and furrows? Look and look

0:37:01.040 --> 0:37:02.880
<v Speaker 1>at it. It's just like I can tell it's crooked.

0:37:03.400 --> 0:37:05.320
<v Speaker 1>And Dale was like, well, do you want the fairies

0:37:05.360 --> 0:37:08.200
<v Speaker 1>coming straight at you. I didn't think, so You're welcome.

0:37:08.760 --> 0:37:11.120
<v Speaker 1>This of course also reminds me of on one hand

0:37:11.160 --> 0:37:14.280
<v Speaker 1>this and this may have well be connected, uh, the

0:37:14.280 --> 0:37:19.200
<v Speaker 1>the idea that vampires might be deterred by hanging some

0:37:19.280 --> 0:37:22.360
<v Speaker 1>sort of a nodded item or or carefully woven item

0:37:22.400 --> 0:37:25.000
<v Speaker 1>out for them, like a complex pattern that will draw

0:37:25.040 --> 0:37:27.040
<v Speaker 1>their attention and they have to deal with and maybe

0:37:27.040 --> 0:37:29.520
<v Speaker 1>get they'll either spend all their time doing that and

0:37:29.600 --> 0:37:31.600
<v Speaker 1>leave you alone, or perhaps even get caught in the

0:37:31.600 --> 0:37:34.680
<v Speaker 1>sunlight the loose track of time. And then of course

0:37:34.719 --> 0:37:37.120
<v Speaker 1>I can't help but think of crop circles as well,

0:37:37.560 --> 0:37:39.800
<v Speaker 1>which again, as we've discussed I think we've discussed this

0:37:39.840 --> 0:37:41.640
<v Speaker 1>in the show before. I mean crop crop circles are

0:37:42.000 --> 0:37:45.759
<v Speaker 1>pretty much put to bed as a you know, is

0:37:45.800 --> 0:37:50.799
<v Speaker 1>the work of human actors. But thinking about like sort

0:37:50.840 --> 0:37:53.520
<v Speaker 1>of the draw to do this to a field, like

0:37:53.560 --> 0:37:57.600
<v Speaker 1>the human um intention to do this, and there's there

0:37:57.600 --> 0:37:59.520
<v Speaker 1>are several factors that can play into that someone which

0:37:59.600 --> 0:38:01.520
<v Speaker 1>may actually they come up in our next episode of

0:38:01.520 --> 0:38:05.640
<v Speaker 1>such to blow your mind. But um, but the the

0:38:05.680 --> 0:38:08.040
<v Speaker 1>idea of like just seeing that field, like I wonder

0:38:08.040 --> 0:38:10.200
<v Speaker 1>if there's some sort of draw that like, no, the

0:38:10.280 --> 0:38:13.600
<v Speaker 1>lines are too too perfect. Everything is just too pristine,

0:38:13.760 --> 0:38:18.000
<v Speaker 1>like this this this, this land has been too finely transformed.

0:38:18.360 --> 0:38:20.279
<v Speaker 1>We gotta get some swirls in there. We gotta get

0:38:20.320 --> 0:38:23.840
<v Speaker 1>some circles, you know. Yeah, that is a good comparison.

0:38:23.880 --> 0:38:25.560
<v Speaker 1>I didn't think you were going to crop circles though.

0:38:25.600 --> 0:38:27.600
<v Speaker 1>I thought you were going to mention the jung she

0:38:28.000 --> 0:38:31.640
<v Speaker 1>being uh being warded off by spilling glutinous rice on

0:38:31.680 --> 0:38:35.239
<v Speaker 1>the floor because they'll I think they'll be counting the grains, right. Oh, yeah,

0:38:35.440 --> 0:38:37.480
<v Speaker 1>that that also, that's a good point as well. I've

0:38:37.480 --> 0:38:40.800
<v Speaker 1>forgot about that one, something about yeah, the the inhuman

0:38:40.840 --> 0:38:45.520
<v Speaker 1>analytical mind of the of of non human beings and folklore,

0:38:45.960 --> 0:38:49.040
<v Speaker 1>and that there they can be led astray by and

0:38:49.239 --> 0:38:53.200
<v Speaker 1>by either random randomized patterns or things of of human

0:38:53.200 --> 0:38:55.879
<v Speaker 1>creation that have some sort of eloquence to them, which

0:38:55.880 --> 0:38:58.279
<v Speaker 1>is kind of ironic given that we're talking about situations

0:38:58.360 --> 0:39:00.360
<v Speaker 1>where human beings may in some cases of just like

0:39:00.400 --> 0:39:04.439
<v Speaker 1>completely flipped their wig over finding an old flint arrow

0:39:04.480 --> 0:39:14.600
<v Speaker 1>in the dirt. So I I guess it cuts both winds. Now,

0:39:14.600 --> 0:39:16.840
<v Speaker 1>there's one more paper. I wanted to briefly mention that

0:39:16.920 --> 0:39:20.280
<v Speaker 1>gets way more into the weeds about a particular text

0:39:20.520 --> 0:39:23.880
<v Speaker 1>that is believed or has been believed to reference elf shot.

0:39:24.560 --> 0:39:26.680
<v Speaker 1>But I thought this was interesting too. So this was

0:39:26.719 --> 0:39:30.480
<v Speaker 1>a paper by a professor of English at the University

0:39:30.520 --> 0:39:34.759
<v Speaker 1>of Leeds named Alaric Hall called Calling the Shots the

0:39:34.800 --> 0:39:40.080
<v Speaker 1>Old English Remedy Gift Horse of Scotland CE and Anglo

0:39:40.160 --> 0:39:44.319
<v Speaker 1>Saxon elf Shot, published in two thousand five. So this

0:39:44.360 --> 0:39:47.600
<v Speaker 1>paper is mainly an attempt to critically re examine an

0:39:47.640 --> 0:39:52.960
<v Speaker 1>Anglo Saxon text called Gift Horse of Scotland c. Which

0:39:53.080 --> 0:39:56.680
<v Speaker 1>is a passage from a medieval Anglo Saxon medical text

0:39:56.880 --> 0:39:59.560
<v Speaker 1>that has been widely interpreted as being about elf shot.

0:40:00.040 --> 0:40:03.319
<v Speaker 1>The title gift Horse of Scott and c. Translates to

0:40:03.600 --> 0:40:06.600
<v Speaker 1>if a horse be and then the word is off scotten,

0:40:06.880 --> 0:40:10.439
<v Speaker 1>And the question is what does of Scott mean? It's

0:40:10.480 --> 0:40:13.719
<v Speaker 1>been traditionally translated as elf shot if a horse be

0:40:13.880 --> 0:40:17.440
<v Speaker 1>elf shot. Hall argues that it should not be understood

0:40:17.480 --> 0:40:20.479
<v Speaker 1>that way, and yet there are still references to elf

0:40:20.520 --> 0:40:25.080
<v Speaker 1>attacks within the passage. So this is Hall's translation of

0:40:25.120 --> 0:40:28.400
<v Speaker 1>this text, which is interesting in itself. If a horse

0:40:28.440 --> 0:40:32.480
<v Speaker 1>be off Scott take, then a dagger who's halft is

0:40:32.520 --> 0:40:35.920
<v Speaker 1>of fallow Ox's horn, and in which there are three

0:40:36.080 --> 0:40:39.680
<v Speaker 1>brass nails. And then there's a term that every time

0:40:39.760 --> 0:40:43.360
<v Speaker 1>is rendered as right slash. Inscribe, I'm just gonna say, inscribe.

0:40:44.160 --> 0:40:48.279
<v Speaker 1>Inscribe on the horse on the forehead, Christ's mark, so

0:40:48.360 --> 0:40:53.160
<v Speaker 1>it bleeds. Inscribe then Christ's mark on the spine, and

0:40:53.320 --> 0:40:56.920
<v Speaker 1>on each of the limbs which you can grasp. This,

0:40:57.040 --> 0:41:00.239
<v Speaker 1>shall you do take a staff strike on the act,

0:41:00.640 --> 0:41:05.160
<v Speaker 1>then the horse will be well. And inscribe on the

0:41:05.239 --> 0:41:10.360
<v Speaker 1>daggers handle. These words been a de cite omnia opera

0:41:10.440 --> 0:41:14.200
<v Speaker 1>domini dominum, which means bless all the works of the

0:41:14.280 --> 0:41:19.000
<v Speaker 1>Lord of lords. Should it be Alf's which is on it,

0:41:19.520 --> 0:41:23.160
<v Speaker 1>this will do as a remedy for it. And so

0:41:23.239 --> 0:41:26.239
<v Speaker 1>Hall makes the argument in this paper that the primary

0:41:26.280 --> 0:41:29.200
<v Speaker 1>condition being described in this text under the word off

0:41:29.239 --> 0:41:33.080
<v Speaker 1>scotten should not be translated as elf shot, as it

0:41:33.120 --> 0:41:37.239
<v Speaker 1>traditionally has been. But it's something like badly pained. It's

0:41:37.520 --> 0:41:42.880
<v Speaker 1>more more mundane condition that is prompting this entire remedy. However,

0:41:43.040 --> 0:41:45.680
<v Speaker 1>even if that's correct, the last line of the remedy

0:41:45.960 --> 0:41:50.279
<v Speaker 1>does mention the idea of this word alf the a

0:41:50.440 --> 0:41:54.759
<v Speaker 1>E combined vowel and then l f e uh. Though

0:41:54.760 --> 0:41:57.160
<v Speaker 1>this sentence is also kind of difficult to translate, the

0:41:57.160 --> 0:41:58.719
<v Speaker 1>one that's got the alfh in it. I think that

0:41:59.080 --> 0:42:02.400
<v Speaker 1>the understanding that makes the most senses, this whole remedy

0:42:02.480 --> 0:42:05.879
<v Speaker 1>is for regular bad pain and horses, and then there's

0:42:05.880 --> 0:42:09.880
<v Speaker 1>an additional remedy, the one that's riding on the daggers

0:42:09.920 --> 0:42:12.200
<v Speaker 1>handle the words bless all the works of the Lord

0:42:12.239 --> 0:42:16.480
<v Speaker 1>of lords. Uh. That additional remedy is like a special

0:42:16.640 --> 0:42:20.480
<v Speaker 1>extra dose of holiness that should be applied if the

0:42:20.560 --> 0:42:24.440
<v Speaker 1>cause of the horses pain is injury by an elf.

0:42:24.640 --> 0:42:27.480
<v Speaker 1>Though it doesn't explain how you tell the difference between

0:42:27.880 --> 0:42:31.080
<v Speaker 1>normal bad pain and bad pain caused by an elf.

0:42:31.120 --> 0:42:33.879
<v Speaker 1>You know, of course, the the elf injury being even

0:42:33.920 --> 0:42:38.000
<v Speaker 1>more unholy and requiring more holiness or more piety in

0:42:38.080 --> 0:42:40.520
<v Speaker 1>order to undo either way you shake it. From a

0:42:40.560 --> 0:42:44.800
<v Speaker 1>modern perspective, it's a lot of uh cutting and striking

0:42:44.840 --> 0:42:48.040
<v Speaker 1>of a pain horse. Yeah, jeez, you feel bad for

0:42:48.040 --> 0:42:51.880
<v Speaker 1>the horse now, as we uh, As we go to

0:42:51.920 --> 0:42:54.399
<v Speaker 1>close out this look at elf shot, I did want

0:42:54.400 --> 0:42:57.839
<v Speaker 1>to come back to some basic questions, some of which

0:42:57.840 --> 0:43:01.240
<v Speaker 1>we've already got into, concerning the art theology of elf shot,

0:43:01.640 --> 0:43:04.279
<v Speaker 1>who were the people who made these artifacts and how

0:43:04.280 --> 0:43:07.080
<v Speaker 1>did they get to the regions where the artifacts were found?

0:43:07.160 --> 0:43:10.160
<v Speaker 1>And then of course you know, interpreted and reinterpreted within

0:43:10.200 --> 0:43:13.120
<v Speaker 1>these folkloric traditions. Uh. This of course is a broad

0:43:13.200 --> 0:43:16.319
<v Speaker 1>question because as we've we've mentioned already, we're talking about

0:43:16.360 --> 0:43:19.680
<v Speaker 1>multiple areas. We're talking about locations throughout the British Isles

0:43:19.719 --> 0:43:22.640
<v Speaker 1>and even outside of the British Isles. But just limiting

0:43:22.680 --> 0:43:24.719
<v Speaker 1>the question to the British Isles, were still looking at

0:43:24.760 --> 0:43:28.440
<v Speaker 1>close to a million years of occupation by various human species,

0:43:28.760 --> 0:43:32.520
<v Speaker 1>including Neanderthals. And as for the how they got there,

0:43:32.520 --> 0:43:36.360
<v Speaker 1>the predominant theories involved land bridges between Europe and Britain

0:43:36.360 --> 0:43:39.920
<v Speaker 1>that were president at the time. And regarding Ireland, I've

0:43:40.040 --> 0:43:44.840
<v Speaker 1>seen hypotheses that involve boats, land bridges and also ice bridges.

0:43:45.920 --> 0:43:48.120
<v Speaker 1>But just to give a few examples that really sort

0:43:48.120 --> 0:43:51.680
<v Speaker 1>of drive home at the time we're talking about here, Uh,

0:43:51.719 --> 0:43:55.399
<v Speaker 1>there are stone tool and footprints in Norfolk. The date

0:43:55.440 --> 0:43:59.000
<v Speaker 1>back and estibated nine hundred thousand years uh, and these

0:43:59.000 --> 0:44:01.760
<v Speaker 1>would be the work and the and or the footprints

0:44:01.800 --> 0:44:07.360
<v Speaker 1>of Homo antecessor. Notable here are the Happisburg footprints in Norfolk,

0:44:07.640 --> 0:44:10.440
<v Speaker 1>and also a black flint hand axe was also found

0:44:10.440 --> 0:44:14.880
<v Speaker 1>in this area. So Homo antecessor they were makers of

0:44:14.920 --> 0:44:18.600
<v Speaker 1>simple stone tools, and it looks like many experts think

0:44:18.640 --> 0:44:22.080
<v Speaker 1>that they might not have had mastery of fire. By

0:44:22.160 --> 0:44:26.360
<v Speaker 1>four thousand BC, e Neolithic culture was firmly established on

0:44:26.400 --> 0:44:30.000
<v Speaker 1>the British Isles and lasted till roughly Uh, it's just

0:44:30.080 --> 0:44:32.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, the rough time period of our histories, uh,

0:44:32.719 --> 0:44:36.680
<v Speaker 1>two thousand, five hundred BC. And of course between three

0:44:36.719 --> 0:44:40.440
<v Speaker 1>thousand BC and two thousand BC we see the construction

0:44:40.480 --> 0:44:43.640
<v Speaker 1>of Stonehenge, one, of course the most famous, if not

0:44:43.719 --> 0:44:46.960
<v Speaker 1>the most famous testament to prehistoric Britain. And of course

0:44:47.000 --> 0:44:50.759
<v Speaker 1>even Stonehenge gets wrapped up into various folklore, traditions and

0:44:50.800 --> 0:44:56.640
<v Speaker 1>folkloric interpretations and reinterpretations that involved at times the wizard Merlin,

0:44:57.120 --> 0:45:01.960
<v Speaker 1>but also the Christian devil, and even during the Roman period,

0:45:01.960 --> 0:45:04.560
<v Speaker 1>which would have been a roughly forty three CE two

0:45:04.600 --> 0:45:10.080
<v Speaker 1>four tense, the Roman sky god Kalis. More realistically or

0:45:10.239 --> 0:45:12.640
<v Speaker 1>more on this sort of you know, realistic interpretation and

0:45:12.680 --> 0:45:16.319
<v Speaker 1>reinterpretation standpoint, it was at one point thought to be

0:45:16.360 --> 0:45:20.560
<v Speaker 1>credited to the work of Druidic culture. But this culture

0:45:20.560 --> 0:45:23.600
<v Speaker 1>didn't exist till three d b C, which would have

0:45:23.600 --> 0:45:26.280
<v Speaker 1>been too late, so the stones were already ancient history

0:45:26.320 --> 0:45:30.359
<v Speaker 1>to the Druids. Now, another example that I found really

0:45:30.400 --> 0:45:35.040
<v Speaker 1>interesting of talking about found arrowheads uh in the British Isles.

0:45:35.400 --> 0:45:40.280
<v Speaker 1>In archaeologists from the University of Reading discovered a four thousand,

0:45:40.320 --> 0:45:44.320
<v Speaker 1>five hundred year old flint arrowhead a few miles from Stonehenge,

0:45:44.440 --> 0:45:48.320
<v Speaker 1>and according to David Dawson, director of the Wiltshire Museum,

0:45:48.360 --> 0:45:54.040
<v Speaker 1>this particular arrowhead is not only finally preserved, but incredibly fragile,

0:45:54.480 --> 0:45:57.640
<v Speaker 1>suggesting that it was never actually intended for use in

0:45:57.719 --> 0:46:02.319
<v Speaker 1>war or hunting, but was rather ceremonial or decorative and

0:46:02.520 --> 0:46:06.240
<v Speaker 1>or decorative um this was. You can look up images

0:46:06.280 --> 0:46:08.200
<v Speaker 1>of this. There was some news articles at the time.

0:46:08.520 --> 0:46:11.840
<v Speaker 1>The arrowhead was unearthed in two parts, two different digs,

0:46:11.960 --> 0:46:15.440
<v Speaker 1>five years apart, and it is quite elegent looking. It

0:46:15.520 --> 0:46:19.320
<v Speaker 1>has like one it has barbs, but one really long

0:46:19.440 --> 0:46:22.600
<v Speaker 1>barb and elongated barb on one side. So I don't

0:46:22.640 --> 0:46:24.600
<v Speaker 1>know about you, but I find that really interesting because

0:46:24.760 --> 0:46:28.480
<v Speaker 1>I think it's easy to think of folkloric interpretation of

0:46:28.520 --> 0:46:31.480
<v Speaker 1>found objects to be a luxury of later civilizations on

0:46:31.520 --> 0:46:35.440
<v Speaker 1>the British hiles to think supernaturally about about these about

0:46:35.480 --> 0:46:37.440
<v Speaker 1>these items. But certainly, and certainly there's a lot we

0:46:37.480 --> 0:46:40.759
<v Speaker 1>don't know about concerning pre Roman and prehistoric Britain. But

0:46:40.880 --> 0:46:45.360
<v Speaker 1>even of forty years ago, uh, this find would suggest

0:46:45.719 --> 0:46:50.439
<v Speaker 1>that people here were already capable of sublime interpretations and

0:46:50.560 --> 0:46:53.839
<v Speaker 1>uh and perhaps mystical meanings for their own created artifacts.

0:46:54.200 --> 0:46:57.360
<v Speaker 1>That you could have this this sacred arrow, uh that

0:46:57.520 --> 0:47:00.640
<v Speaker 1>wasn't found, that was made, but some of the same

0:47:00.800 --> 0:47:05.040
<v Speaker 1>energy that goes into the the the interpretation of these artifacts,

0:47:05.520 --> 0:47:08.279
<v Speaker 1>you know, thousands of years later, was already present in

0:47:08.320 --> 0:47:11.400
<v Speaker 1>the cultures that made their home here, right. And so

0:47:11.440 --> 0:47:13.359
<v Speaker 1>we don't know what it would have been used for,

0:47:13.440 --> 0:47:16.400
<v Speaker 1>but it's clear that it would not have been useful

0:47:16.480 --> 0:47:20.040
<v Speaker 1>for actual shooting of an arrow. So you know, it

0:47:20.120 --> 0:47:24.600
<v Speaker 1>could be decorative, it could be medicinal, some kind of amulet.

0:47:24.680 --> 0:47:27.279
<v Speaker 1>It could be magical or ceremonial. We don't know, but

0:47:27.320 --> 0:47:30.520
<v Speaker 1>in any case, it would be a symbolic arrowhead rather

0:47:30.640 --> 0:47:35.160
<v Speaker 1>than one used for the literal, direct mundane purpose. Yeah,

0:47:35.239 --> 0:47:38.360
<v Speaker 1>and so you can imagine at some point in in

0:47:38.520 --> 0:47:43.200
<v Speaker 1>history after this point, uh, if someone were to find

0:47:43.239 --> 0:47:45.960
<v Speaker 1>an arrow had like this especially, I mean any arrow

0:47:46.000 --> 0:47:49.480
<v Speaker 1>had obviously any kind of novel lump of stone um

0:47:50.280 --> 0:47:53.520
<v Speaker 1>could find itself interpreted as an elf arrow and and

0:47:53.520 --> 0:47:57.800
<v Speaker 1>and incorporated into elf shot folklore. But imagine if you

0:47:57.880 --> 0:48:00.799
<v Speaker 1>found this, you know, clearly and an arrow that that

0:48:00.920 --> 0:48:03.960
<v Speaker 1>looks too fine to be shot. You know, that's almost

0:48:04.120 --> 0:48:07.640
<v Speaker 1>ephemeral in its construction, Like who would make this? Why

0:48:07.680 --> 0:48:10.080
<v Speaker 1>would they make this? Clearly this is the work of

0:48:10.120 --> 0:48:13.239
<v Speaker 1>the elves. But also I think it's just yeah, it's

0:48:13.239 --> 0:48:17.799
<v Speaker 1>just worth remembering the the deep history of of of

0:48:17.880 --> 0:48:19.960
<v Speaker 1>people on the British Isles. You know, it might not

0:48:20.000 --> 0:48:22.640
<v Speaker 1>be as deep as uh as some other areas. I like,

0:48:22.680 --> 0:48:24.399
<v Speaker 1>you know, you're looking at what on France, I think

0:48:24.400 --> 0:48:26.560
<v Speaker 1>it's what one point fifty seven million years ago we

0:48:26.600 --> 0:48:28.960
<v Speaker 1>have some of the earliest known evidence of human beings.

0:48:29.520 --> 0:48:35.240
<v Speaker 1>But still you have human species on the British Isles. Uh.

0:48:35.280 --> 0:48:38.080
<v Speaker 1>You know that as early as almost a million years ago,

0:48:38.280 --> 0:48:43.319
<v Speaker 1>different species, different cultures, different waves of technology and arrivals

0:48:43.360 --> 0:48:47.360
<v Speaker 1>in the subsequent centuries and millennium millennia, and of course

0:48:47.440 --> 0:48:51.800
<v Speaker 1>different waves of interpretation and reinterpretation of what came before.

0:48:53.239 --> 0:48:54.960
<v Speaker 1>All Right, we're gonna go and close it out there,

0:48:55.000 --> 0:48:56.839
<v Speaker 1>but obviously we'd love to hear from everyone out there.

0:48:56.960 --> 0:48:59.799
<v Speaker 1>We'd especially love to hear from folks listening to the

0:48:59.800 --> 0:49:02.719
<v Speaker 1>show oh on the British Aisles, or folks who have

0:49:02.760 --> 0:49:05.359
<v Speaker 1>spent time on the British Isles. Perhaps you have some

0:49:05.680 --> 0:49:08.520
<v Speaker 1>tidbits some local lore to share with us. If so,

0:49:08.560 --> 0:49:11.400
<v Speaker 1>we'd love to hear from you. Reminder that Stuff to

0:49:11.400 --> 0:49:14.840
<v Speaker 1>Blow Your Mind is a primarily a science podcast that

0:49:14.840 --> 0:49:17.319
<v Speaker 1>publishes on Tuesdays and Thursdays and the Stuff to Blow

0:49:17.320 --> 0:49:20.319
<v Speaker 1>Your Mind podcast feed but on Monday's we do a

0:49:20.360 --> 0:49:25.280
<v Speaker 1>listener mail episode where we read various missives from our listeners.

0:49:25.600 --> 0:49:28.520
<v Speaker 1>On Wednesday's we do a short form artifact or monster fact.

0:49:29.000 --> 0:49:31.600
<v Speaker 1>On Friday's we do Weird House Cinema. That's our time

0:49:31.960 --> 0:49:34.680
<v Speaker 1>to set aside most serious concerns and just talk about

0:49:34.719 --> 0:49:37.640
<v Speaker 1>a weird film. Huge thanks as always to our excellent

0:49:37.680 --> 0:49:40.920
<v Speaker 1>audio producer Seth Nicholas Johnson. If you would like to

0:49:40.960 --> 0:49:43.480
<v Speaker 1>get in touch with us with feedback on this episode

0:49:43.520 --> 0:49:45.680
<v Speaker 1>or any other, to suggest a topic for the future,

0:49:45.800 --> 0:49:47.880
<v Speaker 1>or just to say hello, you can email us at

0:49:48.000 --> 0:49:58.560
<v Speaker 1>contact at Stuff to Blow your Mind dot com. Stuff

0:49:58.560 --> 0:50:01.160
<v Speaker 1>to blow your mind. It's production I Heart Radio. For

0:50:01.239 --> 0:50:03.239
<v Speaker 1>more podcasts for my heart Radio. This is the I

0:50:03.280 --> 0:50:06.120
<v Speaker 1>heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listening to

0:50:06.120 --> 0:50:06.920
<v Speaker 1>your favorite shows.