Speaker 1: Hey guys, it's Linda from the Handity Show here. And
Speaker 1: as you know, Sean and I never promote the stock
Speaker 1: market or investing in it, but I'm sure you've all
Speaker 1: seen the great GDP numbers, the awesome economy that Donald
Speaker 1: Trump is giving us, and we want you to benefit
Speaker 1: from it as well. So now we've discovered doctor Richard
Speaker 1: Smith his incredible financial software tools. They're trusted by thousands.
Speaker 1: It tracks over twenty billion dollars of investments. And if
Speaker 1: you're planning for your retirement, you have any money at
Speaker 1: all invest in the stock market, you need to go
Speaker 1: to Hannity dot com forward slash retirement right now. Check
Speaker 1: it out, Hannity dot Com Retirement. All right, glad you're
Speaker 1: with us and write down our toll free telephone number.
Speaker 1: We welcome back live, our amazing friends and Philly every
Speaker 1: afternoon three to six Eastern time, right there on the
Speaker 1: Big Talker twelve ten WPHT and many thanks to our
Speaker 1: Philly listeners and the PD there there was no bigger
Speaker 1: Philly Flyers fan than me. Mark Levin thinks he is
Speaker 1: because Mark loves Philly, but Bobby Clark, Reggie Leech, Rick mccleich,
Speaker 1: Bernie Perant DuPont. I mean these they were hound dog
Speaker 1: Kelly Schultz, I mean they called him the broad Street
Speaker 1: Bullies for a reason. You're actually you came from like
Speaker 1: section into high school on Broad Street. You did go
Speaker 1: to I did. It was a pretty tough neighborhood where
Speaker 1: you grew up. I'm a bully, You're a I wish
Speaker 1: I was a broad hockey Listen. Now they're getting to
Speaker 1: the point where they're trying to take fighting out of hockey.
Speaker 1: I mean it's like, oh was everyone gets excited when
Speaker 1: there was a fight. They if they had enforcers, if
Speaker 1: you went after Bobby Clark, who was one of the
Speaker 1: best centers, he had the greatest pictures of you. Look
Speaker 1: at Bobby Clark, there's no teeth. I actually met the
Speaker 1: former owner of the Flyers they recently passed away, Ed
Speaker 1: Snyder was his name, and I'm I'm speaking at some
Speaker 1: event and some heckler stands up and there was there's
Speaker 1: the Broad Street Bullies. He's just stood, Hey, we didn't
Speaker 1: come here to listen to you. You can sit your
Speaker 1: ass down right now. It's great. And one thing you
Speaker 1: could say about Philly sports is that they take their
Speaker 1: sports very seriously. Every town takes it seriously. Every Philly.
Speaker 1: Philly is unto its own. Hey, Phillies, I gotta admit,
Speaker 1: the Phillies are doing really well this year. And uh,
Speaker 1: I think they they built their team backup. They look
Speaker 1: sign I mean it's huge. Oh, I'm telling you it's massive.
Speaker 1: Get about it. Although I don't think they were happy
Speaker 1: with the last shot of the Raptors game last night.
Speaker 1: Oh my, I mean it's literally to point two point one.
Speaker 1: He released it in time. Then it's bounce, bounce, score
Speaker 1: four seconds. Man, it's game seven. Can you imagine that?
Speaker 1: You know, that's never happened in NBA history before. It's incredible,
Speaker 1: never no one time. Well I was watching it, I'm like,
Speaker 1: no way this is going in. No way, no way
Speaker 1: that's going in anyway. Philly, welcome you. Uh We're always
Speaker 1: glad to have you with us and for you in Philly.
Speaker 1: It's eight hundred nine for one, Sean if you want
Speaker 1: to be a part of the program, right, we got
Speaker 1: a lot coming up in the course of the program today.
Speaker 1: I'm telling you there is there's something percolating that's gonna happen.
Speaker 1: I think sooner than later. As her relates to the
Speaker 1: biggest abuse of power corruption scandal in American history. It's
Speaker 1: all lining up, and it doesn't matter what the rage
Speaker 1: Trump psychotic media does anymore because oh, oh, by the way,
Speaker 1: Felicity haven't been pled guilty. We already knew that. I
Speaker 1: guess she's coming to some type of plea deal. He's
Speaker 1: the only one, though, that's the story. Well, she was smart,
Speaker 1: she you know why, she paid the least amount of money,
Speaker 1: and then she fell on her sword, admitted she was
Speaker 1: wrong and came out with I was a sincere apology.
Speaker 1: And all these people that are just it's so clear
Speaker 1: they did it, and they're like insulting everybody's intelligence. The
Speaker 1: DA in that case literally said, Okay, if you don't
Speaker 1: kind of deal with us and you're gonna push this
Speaker 1: any further, we're gonna give you more charges, which they
Speaker 1: did to Laurie Loughlin and these other people. I mean,
Speaker 1: it's kind of weird if you take a picture of
Speaker 1: your kid's face and put it on another kid's body
Speaker 1: and say, oh, my kid does crew. But they never
Speaker 1: did crew once in their life. And I don't think
Speaker 1: there's gonna be any jury that's gonna be sympathetic to
Speaker 1: the reasons, the whys, or some type of explanation. I
Speaker 1: didn't know what I was doing with my five hundred
Speaker 1: thousand dollars. I don't think they're gonna buy it. Hers
Speaker 1: was a little different, though, because what she did was
Speaker 1: she actually paid the proctor, right, So she basically said
Speaker 1: to the proctor, here's money if they screw up to
Speaker 1: make the changes, YadA YadA. Yeah. Well, but I don't
Speaker 1: know what she look on. Whatever she up getting, maybe
Speaker 1: it's just a fine, maybe probation, a couple of months,
Speaker 1: potential in prison. Okay. Maybe other people they're getting years,
Speaker 1: and I think that who's ever advising them. It's like
Speaker 1: there's certain times in life you just gotta say, okay,
Speaker 1: own it. I'm not saying, Look, they deserve due process,
Speaker 1: the presumption of innocence. We're not like the rest of
Speaker 1: the media. We don't rush to judgment. I guess they
Speaker 1: could make whatever defense they feel they have to make,
Speaker 1: but from my perspective, what we've learned doesn't look good.
Speaker 1: It's like the Juse Smullett case. You got two eye
Speaker 1: witnesses saying they were a part of that scam that
Speaker 1: Jesse Smullet got beat up by quote Maga Trump people,
Speaker 1: and then you got the videotape of the two guys
Speaker 1: buying a rope and a red hat that were used
Speaker 1: in that incident, so they claim and Smaller is still
Speaker 1: just clinging to the whole thing. Now, maybe because of
Speaker 1: Kim Fox the prosecutor. Remember a grand jury indicted in
Speaker 1: that case. That was a pretty simple grand jury decision,
Speaker 1: and then she just decided not to prosecute. But then
Speaker 1: there's federal charges that he potentially faces in this. So
Speaker 1: I don't think it's over for him either. And it's
Speaker 1: like anybody's holding steady at some point. It's just you know,
Speaker 1: my kids, it's the same thing. You know, every kid
Speaker 1: is gonna do stupid things. My kids will never reach
Speaker 1: the level of stupidity that I had in my life.
Speaker 1: They just won't. And I but it's like, fine, you
Speaker 1: make a mistake. I always say to my kids, Okay,
Speaker 1: you made a mistake. You do it again. Now you
Speaker 1: make it a choice. It's not a mistake the next time.
Speaker 1: The next time you've made a choice in your life.
Speaker 1: And similarly, you know, especially young I swear I didn't
Speaker 1: do it. I did not eat the cookie. I did
Speaker 1: not eat the cake. Meanwhile, is chocolate icing all over
Speaker 1: their face? The evidence is right there. You didn't have
Speaker 1: one bite of the cake, No, Dad, not a single bite? Really?
Speaker 1: And huh and what's this on your hands? No, it's
Speaker 1: it's poop. It's chocolate icing. It's poop. Um making a flare.
Speaker 1: Could have been vanilla. I don't know what we could
Speaker 1: have called vanilla shaving cream? Um? Oh, is that what
Speaker 1: it is? It doesn't smell like poop, and it doesn't
Speaker 1: smell like shaving cream. Looks like chocolate icing from that
Speaker 1: chocolate cake that you just took a bite out of
Speaker 1: which I told you not to. I don't care that
Speaker 1: the kid eats the cake, but did you eat it? Yeah?
Speaker 1: Own it? Just admit. And sometimes I'm like, you're insulting
Speaker 1: my intelligence. You're making me now punish you for lying,
Speaker 1: not gonna punish you for having the cake. I am
Speaker 1: guilty of wanting cake too. Everybody sees a cake and
Speaker 1: they want to eat it. That's why I have no
Speaker 1: cake in my house ever, because as if there's cake
Speaker 1: in my house, it's not gonna last more than thirty hours,
Speaker 1: well thirty seconds, to be blunt, just like Linda with
Speaker 1: the Sherry's berries. Oh, so many people over honest, I
Speaker 1: ate every single one of them. You sat there and
Speaker 1: ate eight double boxes of Sherry's berries that were supposed
Speaker 1: to be given to everybody. Listen, life is short. You
Speaker 1: to berry? You didn't? You didn't? Did you pay for
Speaker 1: any of them? Here's a lie. They were presents. I'm
Speaker 1: a mother. Oh there were presents who bore you eight
Speaker 1: boxes people, people you want to name them, very friendly
Speaker 1: people on one group of people, the Sherry's berries people,
Speaker 1: and you were supposed to share them and let everyone
Speaker 1: else try them. I sent them to any many friends
Speaker 1: and family members I know. Um. Now what's happening with
Speaker 1: the deep State is getting really fascinated. Remember you got
Speaker 1: an addlering company. They want to demand that the Attorney
Speaker 1: General of the United States sends over the totally, completely
Speaker 1: unredacted version of the Muller Report. Well, he's already sent over,
Speaker 1: and there's up to now only three people that I've
Speaker 1: confirmed that have gone over to read the unredacted Muller Report.
Speaker 1: That would be Lindsay Graham, Mitch McConnell, and Congressman Doug Collins.
Speaker 1: Now why saying it's unredacted. They're still too full and
Speaker 1: seven partial lines of the Mueller obstruction report. In other words,
Speaker 1: that was it, and of everything else. They can see
Speaker 1: the Department of Justice, Nadler's committee. They're asking them to
Speaker 1: break the law. Now they can go over and see
Speaker 1: the whole. It's just a show, it's just an act.
Speaker 1: It is just an attempt to stir the pot and
Speaker 1: create resentment and blame and create a false narrative and
Speaker 1: caricature about the Attorney General. And it wasn't just the
Speaker 1: Attorney General, it was the Office Illegal Counsel, and it
Speaker 1: was Rod Rosenstein. And they took them maybe five seconds
Speaker 1: to figure out there's no obstruction. And Nadler, who never
Speaker 1: wanted the Star Report release, which, by the way, the
Speaker 1: Independent Council law mandated. There were eleven specific felonies listed
Speaker 1: in the Star Report that were committed by then President
Speaker 1: Bill Clinton. It was a reason he got impeached. No
Speaker 1: such thing here with the Muller report. You got FBI
Speaker 1: files showing that Clinton aids were learning as look, we've
Speaker 1: got the IG report is coming out on FISA abuse.
Speaker 1: There's no doubt that there was abuse. We learned last
Speaker 1: week we're great reporting John Solomon that in fact, Christopher
Speaker 1: Steele was on a deadline and Christopher Steele met with
Speaker 1: the Deputy Assistant Secretary of State, a woman by the
Speaker 1: name of Kathleen Cavalec. She put out a written account
Speaker 1: of the meeting with christ for Steele and sent that
Speaker 1: account to the FBI long before, ten full days before
Speaker 1: they FBI used the bulk of the bought and paid
Speaker 1: for Hillary dirty Russian disinformation dossier, so they had a
Speaker 1: warning on that level. Then closed door testimony in August
Speaker 1: of twenty sixteen, again before the October FISA application, Bruce
Speaker 1: Orr warned everybody at the upper levels of the DOJ
Speaker 1: and the FBI that one Hillary paid for it, two
Speaker 1: Steele hated Trump and had a political agenda, and three
Speaker 1: nobody verified it. And then we find out later it's
Speaker 1: an unverifiable dossier anyway, because under oath in Great Britain
Speaker 1: and an interrogatory Steele himself couldn't corroborate his own dossier
Speaker 1: and said, I have no idea how any of it's true.
Speaker 1: And they did it because they wanted to get Trump.
Speaker 1: They did it because they wanted to spy on Trump,
Speaker 1: and they did it at the expense of our constitution
Speaker 1: rule of law. They were willing to lie, and they
Speaker 1: conspired because it was all premeditated, to commit a fraud
Speaker 1: on the FISA Court judges. They did it not once,
Speaker 1: but four separate times. Andrew McCabe, the deputy FBI director
Speaker 1: under Komey, even said no, no dossier, there's no FISA
Speaker 1: application and never would have passed. No judge would have
Speaker 1: approved it if they would have told the FISA Court judge, oh,
Speaker 1: Hillary paid for it. The guy that put it together
Speaker 1: hates Trump, and we haven't confirmed or verified or corroborated
Speaker 1: any of this thing. No judge would have given them
Speaker 1: the FISA application or approved it. It says at the
Speaker 1: top of the FISA application Verified. We now know it's
Speaker 1: unverifiable because the guy that put it together doesn't believe
Speaker 1: in it. And these documents revealed the FBI allowed this
Speaker 1: phony dossier of Christopher Steele to guide the FBI Bureau's
Speaker 1: operation against Tryal. I want to know what impact it
Speaker 1: also had on the Muller report, because Andrew Wasteman, according
Speaker 1: to Or, was one of the people briefed in August
Speaker 1: the twenty sixteen. What part of this did he know
Speaker 1: about Now that we know they knew ahead of time,
Speaker 1: Now the question is, okay, why would they lie to
Speaker 1: the FISA court? Why would they violate the constitutional rights
Speaker 1: not only of Carter Page, but of everybody in the
Speaker 1: Trump campaign? To me, if you're really going to be fair,
Speaker 1: equal and just any convictions associated with any of this
Speaker 1: was made in false pretenses and phony evidence, and there
Speaker 1: was entrapment. And don't forget all the spying that took
Speaker 1: place when they empowered Stefan Helper with the help of
Speaker 1: now we know from nude revelations last week, the blonde
Speaker 1: flirtatious bombshell to go after Page, Papadopoulos and Sam Clovis,
Speaker 1: all right, we got a lot to get to today.
Speaker 1: Glad you're with us. Jason Chaffitz, We expect the Horowitz
Speaker 1: report could be this month or at the latest early
Speaker 1: next month. What's up, everybody. Linda from the show on
Speaker 1: Hannity Show, here to talk about your money, retirement. Your money.
Speaker 1: It's like your health, right, you know, you don't think
Speaker 1: about it until you don't have it. And a lot
Speaker 1: of people are making really bad mistakes, especially with their retirement.
Speaker 1: They're not retiring with enough money. You know what, it's
Speaker 1: just wrong, but have no fear. Meet one of the
Speaker 1: most incredible financial minds in America, doctor Richard Smith. And
Speaker 1: Richard's extraordinary tools are trusted by thousands of Americans. It
Speaker 1: tracks over twenty billion dollars in the stock market, and
Speaker 1: his tools can help you reset your retirement. You're gonna
Speaker 1: be hearing a lot from Sean and me about Richard
Speaker 1: and literally we have never endorsed any financial software tool
Speaker 1: until now. Why because we've never seen anything like this before.
Speaker 1: So see it for yourself. Go to Hannity dot com retirement,
Speaker 1: that's Hannity dot com forward slash retirement and check it out.
Speaker 1: Class year, you wrote it out bed saying Democrats don't
Speaker 1: take the bait on impeachment. You said that if it
Speaker 1: were a post scene as a political partisan exercise, it
Speaker 1: simply couldn't work, and that Democrats shouldn't pursue it. Is
Speaker 1: it getting to the point where you're gonna have to
Speaker 1: change your mind? Well, you know, I was arguing a
Speaker 1: year and a half ago when I wrote that up
Speaker 1: ed that we ought to wait to see what Muller reports.
Speaker 1: Now we have the Muller report now, although we still
Speaker 1: haven't heard from the man himself, and I think the
Speaker 1: first priority has to be get Muller before the Congress
Speaker 1: in American Pea convinced that's going to happen. I am
Speaker 1: convinced it's going to happen. That is inexorable. The American
Speaker 1: people have every right to hear what the man who
Speaker 1: did the investigation has to say, and we now know
Speaker 1: we certainly can't rely on the Attorney general who misrepresented
Speaker 1: his conclusions. Who is that at this point, Adam Schiff,
Speaker 1: I mean, Schiff is just the it's been the biggest liars,
Speaker 1: full of Shiff. Now I have a dossier on Chief,
Speaker 1: our own Hannity built in dossier. We got one on Nadler,
Speaker 1: we got one on Congress Home Maxie Waters. And we
Speaker 1: didn't pay a foreign agent. We didn't funnel money through
Speaker 1: a you know, Perkins Cooey type of group to fusion
Speaker 1: GPS to hire fuffed foreign nationals. Were we actually take
Speaker 1: their own words that they've been lying about for the
Speaker 1: last however many years, And I'd like to invite these
Speaker 1: people on. We'll give them three straight hours and we'll
Speaker 1: go over every lie that they told and every false
Speaker 1: promise that they made and every conspiracy theory they advanced.
Speaker 1: And the only person that I know we have definitive
Speaker 1: proof of collusion on, well, I think Hillary's pretty close,
Speaker 1: but you know, the Russian Dassier gets right there. But
Speaker 1: the only person that's on tape doing it is well,
Speaker 1: the cowardly ship himself. And I don't know why the
Speaker 1: cowardly Ship won't come on. Say that three times fast,
Speaker 1: we'll continue. Hey guys, it's Linda, the executive producer for
Speaker 1: the Sean Hannity Show. You might also know me as
Speaker 1: Shaun's daily sparring partner and now that he's a ninja,
Speaker 1: of course, and every day we argue about all sorts
Speaker 1: of things and talk about lots of stuff, including the
Speaker 1: incredible economy that the President has given everyday Americans. And
Speaker 1: just like that, when we want to tell you about
Speaker 1: how to fight for your retirement, and that's right. Fight.
Speaker 1: There's a huge crisis in America. Millions of people are
Speaker 1: retiring and without enough money. And if that's not shocking enough,
Speaker 1: even if you think you've got your financial act together,
Speaker 1: chances are there a retirement killers out there that you
Speaker 1: don't know anything about. So have no fear. We have
Speaker 1: one of the brightest financial minds in America to help
Speaker 1: make sure your investments for your future retirement are on
Speaker 1: the right track. I'm talking about doctor Richard Smith, the
Speaker 1: founder of Trade Smith, and his mission is to help
Speaker 1: Americans be more financially literate. That's right, Put the power,
Speaker 1: put the knowledge back in your hands. Make better investment decisions,
Speaker 1: and avoid catastrophic mistakes that could cause your retirement to
Speaker 1: be a disaster. That could cause your retirement to be
Speaker 1: a disaster. Thousands and thousands of people trust doctor Smith's
Speaker 1: investment tools to track over twenty billion dollars in the
Speaker 1: stock market, and I'm telling you you should too. When
Speaker 1: we're talking about your retirement. You're in a financial fight
Speaker 1: for your future. Please do yourself a favorite, Folks, register
Speaker 1: right now for doctor Smith's special online event, the Great
Speaker 1: Retirement Recess. Go to Hannity dot com forward slash retirement.
Speaker 1: That's Hannity dot com forward slash retirement. Eliminate the stress,
Speaker 1: eliminate the worry of investing in the stock market. Register now,
Speaker 1: handy now dot com forward slash Retirement. Of course, you
Speaker 1: will face pressure to compromise on things that matter most,
Speaker 1: perhaps even to trade virtue for the appearance to virtue.
Speaker 1: But you should exercise caution when circumstances tempt you to
Speaker 1: disregard principles. As Robert Muller once said, there may come
Speaker 1: a time when you will be tested. You may find
Speaker 1: yourself standing alone against those you thought were trusted colleagues.
Speaker 1: You may stand to lose all that you worked for,
Speaker 1: and it may not be an easy call. All right.
Speaker 1: That was Rod Rosenstein. I guess he gave a commencement
Speaker 1: address somewhere and quoting Robert Muller, there's look, there's happening,
Speaker 1: something happening that is pretty amazing. This was at the
Speaker 1: University of Baltimore School of Law where he made those comments.
Speaker 1: But you can see this now with the closed door
Speaker 1: testimony that has been released. You know we now have
Speaker 1: struck and paid saying, well, we didn't rig Hillary's investigation.
Speaker 1: That was all being handled by the Attorney General Loretta
Speaker 1: Lynch's office. We know Lynch wouldn't let Comey call it
Speaker 1: an investigation but a matter. We know she met with
Speaker 1: Clinton Bill on the Tarmact just days before the decision
Speaker 1: was being made whether to indict Hillary. Wasn't This was
Speaker 1: a slam dunk indictment, you know, but they had classified
Speaker 1: top secret information in a mom and pop shop bathroom
Speaker 1: closet server known as Platts River's network. Then, of course
Speaker 1: then they have the intention. Everyone talks about the intent
Speaker 1: necessary to get an obstruction case, Well, there has to
Speaker 1: be an underlying crime. The underlying crime was eighteen USC.
Speaker 1: Seven ninety three, the Espionage Act. And then of course
Speaker 1: the intent was to destroy the evidence, and that attempt
Speaker 1: was made by destroying and deleting thirty three thousand emails
Speaker 1: and then bleach bit the hard drive. So there's nothing
Speaker 1: there that can be recovered forensically, and just in case,
Speaker 1: if you know, take your blackberries and your iPhones and
Speaker 1: bust them up with hammers and remove the sim cards.
Speaker 1: We're getting a little back information about what actually happened
Speaker 1: in terms of the FBI files that are now slowly
Speaker 1: leaking out thanks to the Freedom of Information Act. But
Speaker 1: we saw that aids to Hillary Clinton. They were on
Speaker 1: high alert. This just came out in the Washington Examiner
Speaker 1: where in January of twenty eleven, Justin Cooper, who was
Speaker 1: the man that oversaw, was overseeing Secretary of State then
Speaker 1: Hillary's home based email servers sent a warning to Uma Abadeen, quote,
Speaker 1: I had to shut down the server. Someone's trying to
Speaker 1: hack us, and while they did not get in, I
Speaker 1: didn't want to let them have the chance to do so.
Speaker 1: Alvert restarted in the morning, he said. In a two
Speaker 1: fifty seven am email, Aberdeen writes, OMG, oh, my God,
Speaker 1: replied at seven oh five that next day. Now, early
Speaker 1: the next morning, Aberdeen wrote to the State Department officials
Speaker 1: Jake Sullivan Cheryl Mills, Clinton's chief of staff, do not
Speaker 1: email Hillary Rodham Clinton anything sensitive. I can explain more
Speaker 1: in person. The sense of alarm that you got with
Speaker 1: Clinton's staff appear in these partially redacted documents released by
Speaker 1: the FBI that this past week now we're part of
Speaker 1: the bureau's midterm midyear exam. Was which way he called
Speaker 1: the you know that operation crossfire hurricane for Hillary. It's
Speaker 1: just the midyear exam, that's all. It's It's just everything
Speaker 1: was now it's Operation Boomerang. Anything sensitive, I can explain
Speaker 1: more in person, she says, But it was obvious a
Speaker 1: sensible alarm with Clinton's staff. Impartially redacted documents released by
Speaker 1: the FBI that were part of the bureaus midyear examined investigation.
Speaker 1: I remember the Freedom of Information Act request. Remember there
Speaker 1: was a test. We got this from Judicial Watch. And
Speaker 1: when the FBI tested just forty of Hillary's emails that
Speaker 1: were recovered, four of them had top secret and classified
Speaker 1: information on it. And there was a feeling among those
Speaker 1: FBI agents, those that care about the law, rank and
Speaker 1: file that were not part of this upper echelon abusing
Speaker 1: their power, ninety nine percent of good people. They were
Speaker 1: shocked that four top secret classified emails were found and
Speaker 1: they only sampled forty and you got sixty three thousand total.
Speaker 1: But they were only supposed to be about a wedding,
Speaker 1: of funeral, yoga, etc. That's what Hillary said at the time. Anyway,
Speaker 1: handwritten notes of an interview in March of twenty sixteen,
Speaker 1: FBI agents wrote that Cooper asserted that a hack was
Speaker 1: never confirmed, but the debate over whether Clinton server and
Speaker 1: the basement of her home in chap Equittic, New York,
Speaker 1: remains alive today. And don't forget the Platts River network one.
Speaker 1: But the debate over whether Clinton server in the basement,
Speaker 1: you know, is just part of this. That followed a
Speaker 1: report last fall that a Chinese company did successfully hack
Speaker 1: into the server. At one point, the FBI believed, and
Speaker 1: I'm sure they were probably right, that at least six
Speaker 1: far and Intelligence services hacked into her server in the
Speaker 1: Mom and Pop bathroom closet. You know, this is why
Speaker 1: Steele's story falls apart, because if the FBI story, where
Speaker 1: you know, with a federal court about an asset Christopher Steele,
Speaker 1: you know, is just it's torn apart because we have
Speaker 1: new memos and John Solomon's been at the forefront of unearthed.
Speaker 1: These show high ranking government officials meeting with Steele. In
Speaker 1: October twenty sixteen. This is when that Christopher Steele met
Speaker 1: with this woman that worked at the Department of State,
Speaker 1: Assistant Secretary of State, Kathleen Cavalac, and her observations were
Speaker 1: recorded exactly ten days before the FBI used as the
Speaker 1: bulk of information the FISA app. In the FISA application,
Speaker 1: Hillary's bought and paid for Russian lines that Steele doesn't
Speaker 1: stand behind. It means they never verified it, they knew
Speaker 1: Hillary paid for it, and they know Steel hated Trump.
Speaker 1: We have now two examples of that and why that
Speaker 1: wasn't a big part of Robert Mueller's investigation considering a
Speaker 1: ad time for Taxi medallion's loan applications, taxes, FARA violations
Speaker 1: is beyond any understanding I have, because he had a
Speaker 1: wide mandate which could take him anywhere that he wanted
Speaker 1: to have. The FBI pretty much blatantly lying about Christopher's
Speaker 1: deal to the FISA court. Oh no, No, he's been
Speaker 1: a great source in the past. Well, he was fired
Speaker 1: for lying and leaking, and then even after the fact,
Speaker 1: he was in contact. We now know from Bruce hors
Speaker 1: notes trying to pass on information to the Special Council
Speaker 1: into Robert Muller, and documents revealed that the FBI allowed
Speaker 1: Steal's false intelligence to guide their operation against Trump. We
Speaker 1: broke that report last week and a half that Christopher
Speaker 1: Steele planned to release his unverified dossie I remember BuzzFeed
Speaker 1: eventually did, but that was in January, but portions of
Speaker 1: it were the more salacious parts at times were released
Speaker 1: to The Washington Post and David Korne and Michael Izikoff,
Speaker 1: and that information had been disseminated to the American people
Speaker 1: for the purposes of influencing the twenty sixteen election. Whole
Speaker 1: story about Trump and Russia, Ritz and hookers and urinating
Speaker 1: on beds. When did you first hear about that? It
Speaker 1: was pretty much there for a long time. Not true,
Speaker 1: but it was out there. So, you know, as we
Speaker 1: get to know more information, we begin to see a
Speaker 1: very even a darker picture emerge where all of this
Speaker 1: was planned out and in spite of all the knowledge
Speaker 1: they had, that they weren't going to stop and noonez
Speaker 1: the House Intelligence Committee member, he's the ranking member now
Speaker 1: former chairman of the House Intel Committee, suggesting now that
Speaker 1: Coomy is in serious legal jeopardy. He reacted to this
Speaker 1: town hall that Coomy did on fake news CNN, and
Speaker 1: he said, this is a guy who continues to just
Speaker 1: take a make a mockery of the entire FBI and
Speaker 1: Department of Justice. And I think one of the reasons
Speaker 1: Rod Rosenstein mentioned Muller and not Comy is because, well
Speaker 1: because Rosenstein didn't agree with Comey and agreed that he
Speaker 1: should have been fired, and he also agreed that there
Speaker 1: was no obstruction in any point. And you know, for
Speaker 1: Nadler threatening to subpoena a reluctant Muller, I think the
Speaker 1: president because that's all part of the executive branch. Now
Speaker 1: that the president he never invoked executive privilege. They encouraged
Speaker 1: every White House employee to go speak to Robert Muller
Speaker 1: and these congressional committees. It cost a fortune for those
Speaker 1: people that were working in the Trump White House, and
Speaker 1: they did it anyway, and then they handed over one
Speaker 1: point four million documents and the President answered written questions.
Speaker 1: You can't cooperate any more than that fact. The President
Speaker 1: now was invoking executive privileges because now this is the
Speaker 1: fifth separate time that they're looking into the same issue,
Speaker 1: and at some point this becomes harassment of you know,
Speaker 1: the presidency in general. Lindsey Graham is saying that one
Speaker 1: key document will blow the lid off the entire Russia
Speaker 1: Gate hoax scandal. He was on this weekend, and you know,
Speaker 1: he dropped a pretty tantalizing hint yesterday about the developments,
Speaker 1: and he talked to Maria bar to Roma and he
Speaker 1: talked about this one document connected to the Steel dossier
Speaker 1: could lift the lid or blow the lid off the
Speaker 1: entire Russia Gate hope scandal. He said, there's a document
Speaker 1: that's classified that I'm going to try and get unclassified.
Speaker 1: That takes the dossier, all the pages of it, and
Speaker 1: it has verification to one side, and Graham told Baratoromo
Speaker 1: that there's really no verification other than media reports that
Speaker 1: were generated by reporters that received the dossier. This is
Speaker 1: again they were acting like they were separate sources. By
Speaker 1: the way, a van crashed into a fence near the
Speaker 1: White House. They listen to get into the White House.
Speaker 1: It's pretty much a fortress. You don't get in that easy.
Speaker 1: So we got to see if Graham can get to
Speaker 1: the bottom of that. The bottom line is the dossier
Speaker 1: was never independently confirmed, but it says right on the
Speaker 1: top of a DOSSI of FISA application verified. Now, de
Speaker 1: Jenev is swearing that Horowitz is determined that the FBI
Speaker 1: FISA warrants were obtained illegally. Joe Degeneva is one of
Speaker 1: the most connected people I know, and he said this
Speaker 1: to the Washington Examiner. He said, Michael Horowitz, we have
Speaker 1: learned this is a Degeneva smart guy, has concluded that
Speaker 1: the final three extensions were all illegally obtained. The only
Speaker 1: question now is whether or not the first FISA warrant
Speaker 1: was illegally obtained. I would argue that had to be
Speaker 1: illegally obtained because they used the bulk of information being
Speaker 1: the Clinton Dozier, and they were all warned ahead of time.
Speaker 1: The news in the last week probably changes that story.
Speaker 1: And Muller, by the way, is stonewalling on the identities
Speaker 1: of the private investigators that he hired for the Russia
Speaker 1: gay probe. I wonder why, well, Lindsey Graham rightly so,
Speaker 1: I was telling Donald Trump Junior to just blow off
Speaker 1: the subpoena in the Senate? What is what is Senator
Speaker 1: Bird doing? How many more times do we have to
Speaker 1: investigate one thing? This is a Republican How many more
Speaker 1: questions could you possibly ask somebody that sat there for
Speaker 1: thirty hours? Anyway that Graham says, if I was Donald
Speaker 1: Trump Junior, I'd tell him you could. You don't need
Speaker 1: to go back into the environment anymore. You've been there
Speaker 1: for hours and hours and hours, and nothing's been alleged
Speaker 1: that changes the outcome of the Muller investigations. Time to
Speaker 1: call it a day's right, And the President took a
Speaker 1: swipe at the FBI Director Ray for protecting Russia probe Gang,
Speaker 1: I have no what is Director Ray doing? Every time
Speaker 1: I hear him speak, he never talks about the corruption
Speaker 1: that was in the FBI. We're not talking about the
Speaker 1: FBI is the premier law enforcement agency in the world,
Speaker 1: but that one tenth of one percent is destroying its
Speaker 1: reputation of the ninety nine point nine percent that do
Speaker 1: everything right. So we'll see what happens there. James Baker
Speaker 1: has actually admitted the General Counsel Now he's the one
Speaker 1: guy that thought that Hillary should have been indicted and
Speaker 1: said so he's now admitting he's nervous what the DOJ
Speaker 1: Inspector General is gonna find as it relates to fise
Speaker 1: abuse because he was involved in that decision. Anyway, Here's
Speaker 1: what he said, How nervous are you about the IGH?
Speaker 1: I'm always nervous about the IG, I guess, but I
Speaker 1: mean no, they're coming in after the fact to look
Speaker 1: at what we did when we were trying to do
Speaker 1: it in real time and the having the pressure to
Speaker 1: try to deal with these threats as they were coming.
Speaker 1: I look, I've had a great relationship with the Office
Speaker 1: of the Inspector General the Department of Justice for literally
Speaker 1: decades now. I've been investigated or the matters that I've
Speaker 1: worked on, have been investigated many times by the Inspector General.
Speaker 1: It's not a pleasant process. It is. It's just not
Speaker 1: but the people are pleasant, but the process is not
Speaker 1: the most enjoyable. But it's what we need to have
Speaker 1: in the system. We need to have the Inspector General's
Speaker 1: office to make sure that the American public, the courts,
Speaker 1: the Attorney General, the rest of the government. Congress have
Speaker 1: a inst that the enormous power that is entrusted to
Speaker 1: people at the FBI and the Department of Justice is
Speaker 1: used wisely, appropriately, lawfully, efficiently. And so, you know, I
Speaker 1: welcome the accountability they will. I'm sure that they will
Speaker 1: find things that I didn't know at the time, maybe
Speaker 1: that others didn't know at the time, And you know,
Speaker 1: I just don't know where it's going to go. Unbelievable.
Speaker 1: All right, now, we have a lot more to get to.
Speaker 1: We have Congresswoman to leab Oh her comments, Oh that
Speaker 1: is just priceless. It's something really, really ugly. We talk
Speaker 1: about the rise of anti Semitism in Europe, but it's
Speaker 1: right here, and no Democrat had the courage to call
Speaker 1: out Congresswoman Omar. And then you have to leib on
Speaker 1: this podcast. Oh, there's a kind of calming feeling. I
Speaker 1: always tell folks when I think of the Holocaust. Huh,
Speaker 1: I mean? And then Pelosi invited any mom that is
Speaker 1: a radical to give I guess the opening prayer to Congress.
Speaker 1: I'm like, Uh. This guy, by the way, posted an
Speaker 1: image on social media supporting the Muslim Brotherhood. This guy
Speaker 1: in twenty fourteen, during the conflict with Israel and Hamas Amas,
Speaker 1: by the way, in their charter calls for the destruction
Speaker 1: of Israel. He posted God willing on this blessed night
Speaker 1: as the Third Antifada begins, that the beginning of the
Speaker 1: end of Zionism is here. May Allah help us overcome
Speaker 1: the monster, protect the innocent of the world, and accept
Speaker 1: the murdered as martyrs. Huh. What is going on with
Speaker 1: the Democratic Party anyway? Eight hundred nine four one sewn.
Speaker 1: If you want to be a part of the program,
Speaker 1: all right, when we come back, a lot of news
Speaker 1: we're gonna get to. We have a congressman, two congressmen
Speaker 1: are going to join us. Then later Jason Chaffitz we'll
Speaker 1: talk about the media corruption and congresswoman to leave and
Speaker 1: we'll look at the twenty twenty candidates as well. The
Speaker 1: big scam of the whole address was that there's a crisis.
Speaker 1: There's not a crisis, folks. The President has manufactured one
Speaker 1: heck of a political crisis for himself. Donald Trump is
Speaker 1: manufacturing a national security crisis. You will hear them say
Speaker 1: is that this is a manufactured crisis. It's not a
Speaker 1: national security crisis. It remains a Seinfeld shutdown, all about
Speaker 1: all about nothing. What happens when there is a real crisis,
Speaker 1: when there is a real emergency, does he take to
Speaker 1: the airways? Do we give him the airways? Do we
Speaker 1: believe him? Some question? If there is a crisis at all,
Speaker 1: as the President has claimed, there is not a crisis
Speaker 1: at the border. It's a manufactured crisis for the president
Speaker 1: to get a political when the crisis can have, as
Speaker 1: we see now, a very elastic definition. And he's determined
Speaker 1: to convince you there is a crisis at the border,
Speaker 1: even though an intelligence official tell sin and quote, no
Speaker 1: one is saying this is a crisis except them. President
Speaker 1: Trump mus stuff the American people hostage. Might stop manufacturing
Speaker 1: a crisis. This president just used the backdrop of the
Speaker 1: Oval Office to manufacture a crisis. This is a manufactured crisis.
Speaker 1: No crisis exists, and anyone making the argument is most
Speaker 1: likely guilty of fear mongering and willfully misleading the American people.
Speaker 1: Locals will tell him on the border, even conservatives. Is
Speaker 1: that there isn't a national security crisis. The notion that
Speaker 1: we have a crisis, their security crisis is absolute nonsense.
Speaker 1: Does this is a manufactured crisis and a crisis that
Speaker 1: manufactured by the Trump administration, This artificial crisis of the
Speaker 1: president isn't going to justify his appropriating money for a
Speaker 1: wall that Congress is unwilling to give. Is there a
Speaker 1: crisis at the border of the president said there's a
Speaker 1: humanitarian crisis at the border? Is there? Absolutely not. We
Speaker 1: have a challenge oh our humanitarian issues or challenges for us.
Speaker 1: Unlike most Democrats, I let me co other. We can
Speaker 1: go say forty story time unless you get changed to
Speaker 1: don there in Mexico and you will not like this.
Speaker 1: And tony American employer who knowingly violate the law when
Speaker 1: in fact they hire illegals, unless you do those two
Speaker 1: things all arrestless window addressing. I know I'm not supposed
Speaker 1: to say that one day, but they're the fact. They're fact.
Speaker 1: I'm a guy who rove the law that set up
Speaker 1: a drugs off unlet he got himself posts. People are
Speaker 1: driving across that border with the toneless tons here, tons
Speaker 1: of everything from the bike products who had invented me,
Speaker 1: to cocaine to arrowlands and all covered up through rrupt Mexico.
Speaker 1: The President also said today that former presidents have said
Speaker 1: to him that they wish that they had built a wall.
Speaker 1: Do you recall President Obama saying that I can't think
Speaker 1: of a single one who said that, certainly not President George.
Speaker 1: I mean Ronald Reagan. Um, how you doing, George W. Bush? Um,
Speaker 1: George H. W. Bush Obama, President Obama, come on, say
Speaker 1: you don't buy it. We need border security, but that's
Speaker 1: not the Quarterer security. All right. The Battle of the
Speaker 1: Border now Gladua with us our two Sean Hannity Show
Speaker 1: is now evolved into the twenty twenty narrative of radical
Speaker 1: extreme socialist Dems. Now you have Biden wanting to pay
Speaker 1: for healthcare for illegal immigrants this weekend, Kamala Harris Well,
Speaker 1: she says, you're gonna take away no more independent health
Speaker 1: insurance that affects one hundred and eighty eight million Americans.
Speaker 1: But those Americans that can buy their own health insurance,
Speaker 1: you will help pay for illegal immigrants healthcare. He can't
Speaker 1: make this up. And she has now joined her rivals
Speaker 1: including Joe Biden and Bernie Sanders over the weekend and
Speaker 1: favoring free healthcare. Nothing is free. That means you will
Speaker 1: pay for it, just like Kamala Harris pledging to criminalize
Speaker 1: private gun sales via executive action, and Biden's rivals now
Speaker 1: in the Democratic grace rejecting his middle ground as he
Speaker 1: calls it. On climate change, well, Biden, you know, Senator
Speaker 1: Biden said he supports a seven hundred wall and says
Speaker 1: there's tons of drugs coming across the border. Then of
Speaker 1: course we got the new Joe Biden. The wall is
Speaker 1: not the border security we need, which Joe Biden is,
Speaker 1: you know, speaking on any given day. Of course, it's
Speaker 1: all related to the base of the Democratic Party having
Speaker 1: gone solidly left, you know, just like a newly resurfaced
Speaker 1: two thousand and seven quote, Biden blamed bad schools on
Speaker 1: African American students. The Daily called The Daily Wire put
Speaker 1: this up, and when Biden was asked by the Washington
Speaker 1: Post at the time about the discrepancy in school performance
Speaker 1: in Iowa compared to schools in DC. He said, well,
Speaker 1: there's less than one percent of the population of Iowa
Speaker 1: that's African American, and there's probably less than four or
Speaker 1: five percent that are minorities. What is Washington, what's there?
Speaker 1: So look, it goes back to what you start off with,
Speaker 1: what you're dealing with, he told the Washington Post. And
Speaker 1: then he goes on to discuss dysfunctional homes in the
Speaker 1: minority communities and suggesting minority mothers don't talk to their
Speaker 1: children from the time that they're born. And I'm like,
Speaker 1: who makes these type of broad sweeping insane and ridiculous?
Speaker 1: You know, generalizations have children coming from dysfunctional homes when
Speaker 1: you have kids coming from homes where there's no books,
Speaker 1: a mother from the time they're born doesn't talk to them,
Speaker 1: as opposed to the mother in Iowa who's sitting out
Speaker 1: there and talks to them. Wow, I mean, this is outrageous.
Speaker 1: Kid starts with a three hundred word larger vocabulary at
Speaker 1: age three, after this education gap exists before the kid
Speaker 1: steps foot in the classroom. On top of his views
Speaker 1: on segregation that we have pointed out. This is all
Speaker 1: coming out on crazy uncle Joe. It's it's he's got
Speaker 1: a lot to answer for, not the least of which
Speaker 1: is his position on his son and leveraging a billion
Speaker 1: US dollars in Ukraine. And I'm leaving in six hours.
Speaker 1: You fire the prosecutor that is investigating my son or
Speaker 1: else anyway, joining us now, Congressman Andy Biggs of Arizona
Speaker 1: and Art del Queto is with us. Thank you both
Speaker 1: for being with us. And also Duncan Hunter is with
Speaker 1: us as well. We have three people. It's not well,
Speaker 1: this guest sheet is supposed to be in front of me.
Speaker 1: That's why I didn't know Duncan Hunter was joining us. Sorry,
Speaker 1: welcome all of you. So the Battle of the Border,
Speaker 1: I mean you could really just sum it up in
Speaker 1: Joe Biden, Senator saying he supports a seven hundred mile
Speaker 1: wall because all the drugs coming across the southern border,
Speaker 1: and Joe Biden now saying, oh, that's not going to work.
Speaker 1: How do you explain that? Congressman Biggs well explained it
Speaker 1: this way, Jims and decided to focus on prevening President
Speaker 1: Trump from getting any kind of political victory, and they
Speaker 1: don't want to derail their impeachment efforts. They don't want
Speaker 1: to derail their their efforts to sully him. So they're
Speaker 1: going to pretend that this crisis, because it is a crisis,
Speaker 1: it is an emergency, simply doesn't exist. And so they're
Speaker 1: out there making wild statements in all the while people
Speaker 1: are pouring across here, record numbers, drugs coming across, human trafficking,
Speaker 1: and that's just simply the way they're viewing it. And
Speaker 1: what's your take, Art Delqueto, No, that's what it comes
Speaker 1: down to. Look, I'm not here to root or share
Speaker 1: any certain political party on its own. I've said it
Speaker 1: many times before. Well, you've been a member of the
Speaker 1: Border Patrol since two thousand and three. You grew up
Speaker 1: in Arizona, right along the border. I've lived through my
Speaker 1: whole life, and I can tell you right now, what
Speaker 1: we're experiencing right now is nothing like we've experienced before.
Speaker 1: We have a record number of people coming across, we
Speaker 1: have drugs coming across. We have children that are being
Speaker 1: used for these smuggling organizations. So they can, you know,
Speaker 1: ultimately come into the United States and claim some type
Speaker 1: of asylum and be released in the United States. And
Speaker 1: we're at a point now where I don't understand all
Speaker 1: these individuals that keep saying it's not a crisis. They
Speaker 1: need to figure it out, and they need to understand
Speaker 1: that they better start doing things for the American public
Speaker 1: and doing things for their constituents, for illegals and criminals
Speaker 1: that are coming into the country. That's what it basically
Speaker 1: comes down to. Is your love for this country gonna
Speaker 1: be enough or are you more concerned with your hatred
Speaker 1: towards a certain president. And that's where the problem is
Speaker 1: because I'll tell you what President Trump has been on point.
Speaker 1: I mean, I don't want to sound like a cheerleader,
Speaker 1: but it's hard not to. He has been right on
Speaker 1: point with everything we need on the border. You have
Speaker 1: individuals like Andy Biggs, who is on this phone call
Speaker 1: right now. He has been down to the border numerous
Speaker 1: times with myself, He's brought other congressmen with him. I mean,
Speaker 1: we're not lying, We're basically telling the facts. It's not
Speaker 1: the right side facts or the left side, it's just
Speaker 1: the facts. Let me go to Congressman Duncan Hunter, because
Speaker 1: I also want to get into another issue and that
Speaker 1: is the case of Eddie Gallagher. My sources have told
Speaker 1: me that there is video evidence in that particular case
Speaker 1: Duncan that shows that the allegation against Eddie Gallagher that
Speaker 1: somehow he had killed an innocent person, that the video
Speaker 1: confirms that he was actually giving this I guess combatant
Speaker 1: trache out of me to save his life. Is that true? Yeah,
Speaker 1: that is true. And I brought the video out from
Speaker 1: San Diego for I Don't Here to DC last week
Speaker 1: and I showed it to more than half a dozen
Speaker 1: members of Congress that have worked on this with me
Speaker 1: and talked to the President, and they did this without
Speaker 1: ever seeing the video or photo evidence. The video and
Speaker 1: the photos show Eddie and two other Navy Seal corpman
Speaker 1: providing first day to a ISIS terrorist and Shawan. Back
Speaker 1: to the border issue with the military slant, It seems
Speaker 1: right now that all the Democrats that hate the military
Speaker 1: are very upset that the presidents using one point five
Speaker 1: billion dollars that they've been able to scrounge up out
Speaker 1: of a seven hundred billion dollars DoD budget to secure
Speaker 1: the border. I think the easiest hard even here is
Speaker 1: we're fighting in places like Iraq, Afghanistan, and Syria, while
Speaker 1: we're being overrun here at home. If it's not the
Speaker 1: military's job to protect our borders here and to use
Speaker 1: that Department of Defense money to secure the borders here
Speaker 1: so we're not overrun at home, then I don't know
Speaker 1: what the Department of Defense is doing. That should be
Speaker 1: their number one priorities. Shouldn't be helping out of other countries,
Speaker 1: It should be securing the border here because border security
Speaker 1: is national security. Period. Well, I mean, if we don't
Speaker 1: get this done, I think one of the reasons, and
Speaker 1: you guys correct me if I'm wrong, is you know,
Speaker 1: people from Central America see exactly what's going on. And
Speaker 1: the President is serious. He just got another what one
Speaker 1: point five billion from the Defense Department that had previously
Speaker 1: been designated for the war in Afghanistan and other projects.
Speaker 1: That's an addition to all the other money that he's
Speaker 1: put into the wall. And the President is moving forward
Speaker 1: making the repairs building the wall, and the world seems
Speaker 1: to see it, and as a result, it seems like
Speaker 1: people have determined that this is the last opportunity to
Speaker 1: get in easily. Well, John, I think go ahead, and
Speaker 1: go ahead yeah, Well, well what's happening is there's two things.
Speaker 1: They're trying to get in before the fence gets up.
Speaker 1: But they're also don't forget there's that, there's this is organized,
Speaker 1: there's advertising. There's incentives to get here anyway. So even
Speaker 1: when you get a fence up, unless we correct asylum laws,
Speaker 1: people are going to get on our on our right
Speaker 1: of way and they're going to start saying, hey, look
Speaker 1: I want asylum, and uh, we're not holding them, we're
Speaker 1: letting them loose. And that's getting through there. That's the
Speaker 1: incentives through the grape vine that goes all the way
Speaker 1: down into Central America where people say, oh, yeah, you
Speaker 1: can get in there. Um, but they're hurrying and they're
Speaker 1: coming up, and we've got to we've got to get
Speaker 1: going on the fence. But we also Congress has an
Speaker 1: obligation to get going on the on the asylum laws,
Speaker 1: and and we need to also make sure the executive
Speaker 1: branch gives immigration slash asylum officer authority to our border
Speaker 1: patrol agents. That helps not this asylum crisis. Duncan, you
Speaker 1: were going to add, yeah, and now he's absolutely right,
Speaker 1: and you got to build defense. So so you have
Speaker 1: a barrier, and it's the president's executive privilege to secure
Speaker 1: the southern border. You don't need to pass laws to
Speaker 1: be able to secure the southern border. That's the president's prerogative,
Speaker 1: but it is it is on Congress to fix the
Speaker 1: asylum laws, to institute e verify so that people can't
Speaker 1: hire illegal aliens. That that is our job. That's not
Speaker 1: going to happen with the Democrat Congress, So that the
Speaker 1: president right now needs to do everything he can using
Speaker 1: his executive power to bypass Congress, because that's what you
Speaker 1: got to do right now with Nancy Pelosi running things,
Speaker 1: and do everything he can to secure the order, move
Speaker 1: money to secure the border. We've excited legislatively, the law states,
Speaker 1: especially as it relates to drug trafficking corridors on the
Speaker 1: border of the United States, that the president has the
Speaker 1: authority to build barriers and put up lighting. I've read
Speaker 1: the law fifteen times on this program, and I would
Speaker 1: also argue, and again, that's legislatively but constitutional. The president
Speaker 1: is the commander in chief, and when you have four
Speaker 1: four thousand homicides in two years, and thirty thousand sexual
Speaker 1: assaults in two years and one hundred thousand violent assaults
Speaker 1: committed against Americans by illegal immigrants. That's about the safety
Speaker 1: and security of our entire country. This is how bad
Speaker 1: it is right now. So we have so many individuals
Speaker 1: that are coming. President Trump lowered the numbers with rhetoric alone,
Speaker 1: and then soon after these people saw that nothing was happening,
Speaker 1: they could claim asylum, they'd be released. The numbers started
Speaker 1: growing higher and higher. Now they're higher than they've been before.
Speaker 1: But it's not just Central Americans. I was recently an
Speaker 1: apassle and in under an hour that I was there
Speaker 1: on the line, over two hundred Cubans turned themselves in.
Speaker 1: So other countries are now understanding, hey, just cross say
Speaker 1: those words of asylum. They're so overwhelmed and and our
Speaker 1: holding sales are so overrun that we're just releasing a
Speaker 1: lot of these individuals. So what that's causing is we're
Speaker 1: removing agents from the line to take care of these
Speaker 1: processing centers. Now you're leaving gaps on the line, which
Speaker 1: the drug traffickers are very very much aware of. So
Speaker 1: when you start looking at effectiveness and you start looking
Speaker 1: at our numbers of apprehensions are higher, you have to remember, yes,
Speaker 1: they're higher but they're getting released, and then you've got
Speaker 1: to go to the second thing, which worries me much more.
Speaker 1: All Right, I want to thank you all for being
Speaker 1: one of us. Congressman Biggs, thank you, Art del Queto,
Speaker 1: thank you, sir, appreciate you being with us. Duncan, thank
Speaker 1: you eight hundred and nine for one. Sean. We'll check
Speaker 1: in with Jason Chafts. He's got some insight into Horowitz, Huber,
Speaker 1: the deep state and how much trouble, how many people
Speaker 1: are in for the biggest abuse of power scandal in history.
Speaker 1: All right, the latest on deep state corruption. When we
Speaker 1: get back, Congressman Jason Chafitz joins us, we'll talk to him,
Speaker 1: you know. And the media, you think they've learned a
Speaker 1: single thing anything from this experience of perpetuating lies, propaganda,
Speaker 1: missing nothing. And you sent a letter to the Honorable
Speaker 1: Sector of State Mike Pompeo as well as Michael Horowitz.
Speaker 1: What are you looking for from the Sector of State?
Speaker 1: All the Secretary of State to give me all documents
Speaker 1: related to the eleventh October meeting between Christopher Steele and
Speaker 1: a member of the State Department. The lady in question
Speaker 1: took notes about the meeting and in her note she
Speaker 1: indicates that Steele was urging to get the doc out
Speaker 1: before the election, and she also and hand written notes
Speaker 1: indicates that it was paid for by the Democratic Party,
Speaker 1: the Clinton campaign, the docier. The most important thing is
Speaker 1: she transferred that information to the FBI. So the FBI
Speaker 1: is now noticed in October the eleventh that their confidential
Speaker 1: informant is trying to get the doc out for political purposes,
Speaker 1: and that the State Department figured out the Democrats paid
Speaker 1: for it. How could they then go get a warrant
Speaker 1: based on that same document and not tell the court
Speaker 1: what the State Department told them. Well, in terms of
Speaker 1: the Harrowiz report, I'm hearing that a big portion of
Speaker 1: that will be about the media being complicit, because what
Speaker 1: they did was they created stories, they leaked it to
Speaker 1: the media like Yahoo, like Mother Jones, and then those
Speaker 1: companies reported it, published it, and then they actually the
Speaker 1: FBI used those same stories that they leaked in the
Speaker 1: first place as evidence to get the FISA warrant to
Speaker 1: spy an American citizens. There's a document that's classified that
Speaker 1: I'm gonna try to get unclassified that takes the dossier,
Speaker 1: all pages of it, and it has verification to one side,
Speaker 1: there really is no verification other than media reports that
Speaker 1: were generated by reporters who received the dossier. So the
Speaker 1: bottom line is the dossier has never been independently confirmed.
Speaker 1: Used to get a warrant. They knew the author of
Speaker 1: the dossier was on the Democratic Party payroll. He hated Trump.
Speaker 1: They got the warrant. Anyway, most Americans should be upset
Speaker 1: about that. I'm very upset about it, and we're going
Speaker 1: to get to the bottom of it. Well, how nervous
Speaker 1: are you about the IGH. I'm always a nervous about
Speaker 1: the IG, I guess, but I mean no, they're coming
Speaker 1: in after the fact to look at what we did
Speaker 1: when we were trying to do it in real time
Speaker 1: and having the having the pressure to try to deal
Speaker 1: with these threats as they were coming. I look, I've
Speaker 1: had a great relationship with the Office of the Inspector
Speaker 1: General the Department of Justice for literally decades now. I've
Speaker 1: been investigated or in matters that I've worked on, have
Speaker 1: been investigated many times by the Inspector General. It's not
Speaker 1: a pleasant process, it is. It's just not all right.
Speaker 1: Twenty five now till the top of the hour that
Speaker 1: was Lindsay Graham, and I want POMPEII to give me
Speaker 1: all the documents related to the meeting with Christopher Steele.
Speaker 1: And now the John Solomon's story that we have been
Speaker 1: breaking now for the last week that in fact, this
Speaker 1: woman that worked at the State Department, Kathleen Cavalac, had
Speaker 1: met with Christopher Steele on a couple of occasions, and
Speaker 1: she wrote down the specifics of that meeting. And this
Speaker 1: was all sent to the FBI, all sent to the
Speaker 1: Department of Justice, all about who Christopher Stile was, that
Speaker 1: he had a political agenda and a deadline. And it
Speaker 1: was still the bulk of information that was used from
Speaker 1: the Hillary Russian dossier that even the New York Times
Speaker 1: now believes could have been disinformation, Russian disinformation from the beginning.
Speaker 1: They did it anyway. Now that's on top of the
Speaker 1: closed door testimony of now we now know Bruce Orr
Speaker 1: who warned everybody also in August of twenty sixteen, Hillary
Speaker 1: paid for it, Steele hated Trump. It's not verified. And
Speaker 1: Lindsay then talking about trying to declassify a document that
Speaker 1: shows the Steel dossier verification, Well, we know it's an
Speaker 1: unverifiable document because Steel doesn't stand behind his own document, then,
Speaker 1: of course that was the General Council, the last cut
Speaker 1: of James Baker and testimony he gave, Yeah, I'm always
Speaker 1: nervous about the IG report. Well, I think he should be.
Speaker 1: Now the Department of Justice Inspector General is apparently homing
Speaker 1: in on the FBI use of this unverified Steel dossier
Speaker 1: as the bulk of information to use to get the
Speaker 1: FISA warrants. Remember McCabe himself said no, no dossier, no
Speaker 1: FISA application. And with us. Now, somebody who knows an
Speaker 1: awful lot about this, Box News contributor, former Congress Congressman
Speaker 1: from Utah, Jason Chafitz, is with us. He's the author
Speaker 1: of the book The Deep State. Now, I know you
Speaker 1: know Horowitz. I know you've dealt with Horowitz. I'm not
Speaker 1: trying to be insulting in any way, but he does
Speaker 1: take an awful lot of time time considering as like
Speaker 1: six hundred people working for him to get this information out.
Speaker 1: I give him credit. He's the one that found the
Speaker 1: page and struck text messages. No help from Robert Muller,
Speaker 1: by the way, who could have had it all and
Speaker 1: then cleaned their phones. But you know the Inspector General. Well,
Speaker 1: where do you think we are as it relates to
Speaker 1: this investigation into Five's abuse. Well, thanks, Sean. You know,
Speaker 1: one of the reasons it takes so long is they
Speaker 1: don't get the internal cooperation from the Federal Bureau of Investigation. Remember,
Speaker 1: Horowitz had to actually go to the Pentagon to write code,
Speaker 1: to actually go to cipher the text messages, which now
Speaker 1: revealed literally thousands of text messages between stroke and Page
Speaker 1: and others. So those types of gyrations in writing code
Speaker 1: with the Pentagon to get into the FBI system itself
Speaker 1: is what he's up against. The other thing I would
Speaker 1: note that people forget about it is the already published
Speaker 1: IG report documents and details how FBI personnel were accepting gifts, tickets,
Speaker 1: meals from the media in order to get these stories
Speaker 1: out there implanted. And that seems to be a two
Speaker 1: way street, and I think will be a big part
Speaker 1: of this vis abuse and that story of how these
Speaker 1: FBI personnel were inappropriately interacting with the media and accepting gifts.
Speaker 1: How is it if it's an unverifiable document as I
Speaker 1: suggest it is, because Christopher Steele, when under oath in
Speaker 1: an interrogatory in Great Britain under the threat of perjury
Speaker 1: when he was pushed on the dossier, said, I don't
Speaker 1: have any idea of any of it's true. It's raw intelligence.
Speaker 1: I don't know, maybe fifty fifty. But then if you
Speaker 1: go to the new Nest memo, the Grassly Grand memo,
Speaker 1: they say the bulk of the applications were the dossier.
Speaker 1: Now we know two separate instances. This State Department employee
Speaker 1: by the name of Cabillac had warned everybody after meeting
Speaker 1: with Steal that he was on a political witch hunt
Speaker 1: against Donald Trump pretty much, and then the or closed
Speaker 1: door testimony, but they used it anyway. So wouldn't that
Speaker 1: be a conspiracy to commit fraud on a PHIZA court. Yes.
Speaker 1: And you add on top of that, Sean that John Ratcliffe,
Speaker 1: the Congressman from Texas who is on Intel. He is
Speaker 1: on the House Judiciary Committee. He's one of two people
Speaker 1: that I know of that has fully read the unredacted
Speaker 1: FISA application. And one of the things he said publicly
Speaker 1: is at the very top it says verified at all capitals,
Speaker 1: verified application. That is just a flat out lie from
Speaker 1: everything that we know, all the documents that are starting
Speaker 1: to flow out now, and you're right. You highlighted the
Speaker 1: fact that if there was no docia, there was no
Speaker 1: PISA application. And so the other name that I think
Speaker 1: we should throw out there is this guy, Mark Elias.
Speaker 1: Mark Elias sits in the middle of this. He worked
Speaker 1: for Hillary Clinton, he worked for the DNC, he's a
Speaker 1: fixer there, he's an attorney. And the guy sits in
Speaker 1: the middle of all of this, and I think it's
Speaker 1: the name we're going to hear more of in the future. Okay,
Speaker 1: what about other people, But you know, this is really
Speaker 1: important because a year ago May one year ago this month,
Speaker 1: Rod Rosenstein was on a panel and this is what
Speaker 1: he said about FISA affidavit and a FISA application and
Speaker 1: a warrant. Listen, were operating the Department of Justice. If
Speaker 1: we're going to accuse somebody of wrongdoing, we have to
Speaker 1: have admissible evidence and credible witnesses. We need to prepare
Speaker 1: to prove our case in court, and we have to
Speaker 1: fix our signature to the charging document. That's something that
Speaker 1: not everybody appreciates. There's a lot of talk about FISA applications,
Speaker 1: and many people that I see talking about it seem
Speaker 1: not to recognize what a FIES applicat. FIES application is
Speaker 1: actually a warrant, just like a search warrant. In order
Speaker 1: to get a FISA search warrant, you need an affidavit
Speaker 1: signed by a career federal law enforcement officer who swears
Speaker 1: that the information in the affidavit is true and correct
Speaker 1: to the best of his knowledge and belief. And that's
Speaker 1: the way we operate. And if it's wrong sometimes it is.
Speaker 1: If you find out there's anything incorrect in there, that
Speaker 1: person is going to face consequences. Well, that person is
Speaker 1: going to face consequences. Now we know Komey signed one
Speaker 1: of the f applications, the first one. Is that correct? Yeah?
Speaker 1: And we know that Sally Yates and Gwente signed fieser warrants.
Speaker 1: Is that correct. I'm not sure of all the signatures
Speaker 1: on there, but these are some really high ranking people.
Speaker 1: And then the last application, the third renewal, the fourth
Speaker 1: warrant was signed by Rob Rosenstein himself. Was it not well?
Speaker 1: And that's why I think Rosenstein, you know, on the
Speaker 1: one hand, I want to pat him on the back
Speaker 1: for his service, but on the other hand, the guy
Speaker 1: had conflict and how did he sign this document? Any
Speaker 1: cursory look at this, and they know that the steal
Speaker 1: Dostier steal with somebody that the FBI had already put
Speaker 1: on the list as somebody they wouldn't do business with,
Speaker 1: and yet they use this dossier. Well, to me, Congressman,
Speaker 1: what would happen if I committed a fraud on the court.
Speaker 1: What if anybody in this audience knowingly presented information that
Speaker 1: wasn't verified? And I didn't know that until you had
Speaker 1: told me last week that the word verified is at
Speaker 1: the very top of this whole thing. Well, we would
Speaker 1: make arrangements for your wife to visit you on some
Speaker 1: saturdays in the penitentiary, Sean, and maybe send you some letters,
Speaker 1: but you'd be locked away in jail, and you should
Speaker 1: be if you had done that. Okay, so we expect
Speaker 1: according to the Attorney General, this is what we have
Speaker 1: going on. The Attorney General made it clear to Lindsey
Speaker 1: Graham that he's looking into the investigation into Hillary, which
Speaker 1: even struck him page or saying was rigged and they
Speaker 1: were part of the rigging it themselves. But they're actually
Speaker 1: putting the blame right in the office of the Attorney
Speaker 1: General under Obama, which would be Loretta Lynch. Then of
Speaker 1: course we've got these FISA warrant applications. Then we've got
Speaker 1: other spine going on vis a vis Stephan Helper going
Speaker 1: after Page and Papadopoulos and Sam Clovis and bringing him blonde,
Speaker 1: flirtatious bombshell spies with him. Is that legal to allow
Speaker 1: that to happen? And do you believe there's a possibility
Speaker 1: that our intelligence community, not the rank and file ninety
Speaker 1: nine percent that are good, but maybe the Clappers and
Speaker 1: the Brennan's of this world may be outsourced some work
Speaker 1: to our allies because it's illegal for them to do
Speaker 1: it themselves, to spy on Americans. I'm glad you brought
Speaker 1: that up, because I really do think this story will
Speaker 1: go to Clapper and Brennan themselves. They have been so
Speaker 1: tenacious and trying to fight this back. I think they're
Speaker 1: playing defense. I think they're projecting the fact that they
Speaker 1: potentially could have been heavily involved. And why did a
Speaker 1: lot of this happen overseas Hey, they didn't take Hillary
Speaker 1: Clinton was going to win and be they thought they
Speaker 1: could hide it better over there. So the Inspector General
Speaker 1: report can only focus on Department of Justice ASPETS, but
Speaker 1: they've got to be working with the Inspector General within
Speaker 1: the ICY it's called the intelligence community to also uncover this.
Speaker 1: And that's why you also need the cooperation of the
Speaker 1: State Department. I've met with people at the State Department.
Speaker 1: Every time you meet with them, they take notes. So
Speaker 1: I do believe that John Sullivan's story would be very true.
Speaker 1: I agree. We'll take a break more with former Congressman
Speaker 1: Jason Chaffins of Utah, now a Fox News contributor in
Speaker 1: Hannity fillin, which, by the way, I hear you're doing
Speaker 1: so good. I might be out of a job by Tuesday,
Speaker 1: but you know whatever, they still have to pay me.
Speaker 1: I think you're pretty safe, Sean. I think you're pretty safe.
Speaker 1: All right, So we know everything that's coming. Do you
Speaker 1: believe that those people that signed off on the phony
Speaker 1: buys the application that they never verified, that was unverifiable,
Speaker 1: that they knew Hillary paid for, that they knew was
Speaker 1: put together by somebody who had an agenda against the
Speaker 1: opposition party candidate. Do you believe that these people should
Speaker 1: be charged and will they be charged? Should they be charged? Absolutely,
Speaker 1: they should be charged. I'm booie up I'm more optimistic
Speaker 1: than I was when I was on your show a
Speaker 1: while ago and expressed some testimism, and that is because
Speaker 1: I think Attorney General bar is the real deal. He's
Speaker 1: been there, done that, shown a backbone. I don't think
Speaker 1: he gives a crap on what the national media says.
Speaker 1: And I think if somebody truly did wrong, he will
Speaker 1: hold them accountable. And I think there'll be some of
Speaker 1: the names that you and I and others have been
Speaker 1: talking about. I also think there's probably two or three
Speaker 1: names out there are people we've never heard of that
Speaker 1: we're in the vowels that we're actually doing these things
Speaker 1: in a very nefarious way, and I do hope they're prosecuted.
Speaker 1: All right, let's talk about the next step. If we're
Speaker 1: really going to have equal justice and application of our laws,
Speaker 1: does that mean that bar is right if the investigation
Speaker 1: into Hillary and the Espionage Act and the email server
Speaker 1: and the deleted bleach bit busted up devices obstruction, do
Speaker 1: we have to go there or are we basically just
Speaker 1: giving her a pass? Again? You should go there. You know,
Speaker 1: there are reasons why we have federal election law. Remember,
Speaker 1: all of this happens primarily overseas because of the millions
Speaker 1: of dollars the DNC and the Hillary Rodham Clinton campaign
Speaker 1: are flowing into it. You can't just launder money and
Speaker 1: do those types of things. I mean, they're worried about
Speaker 1: Donald Trump in some twenty minute no nothing meeting. How
Speaker 1: about the millions. It's more than I believe ten million
Speaker 1: dollars that's flowing overseas to do this crap, to lay
Speaker 1: the foundation for these bogus applications. They've got to go
Speaker 1: after that. Yeah, all right, Jason Chafitz, thanks for being
Speaker 1: with us. We'll see some point this week on Hannity
Speaker 1: the Fox News Channel when we come back. Yeah, the
Speaker 1: media cannot let go of their lives, their conspiracy theories,
Speaker 1: their obsessions. It's twenty four seven, hate Trump, rage Trump,
Speaker 1: and they can never ever admit they're wrong. That's just
Speaker 1: that's just impossible. Quick break right back, we'll continue. It's
Speaker 1: the Sean Hannity Show. News Roundup is next. Right here
Speaker 1: for our final news round up and information overload. You
Speaker 1: support the Medicare for All bill I think, initially cosponsored
Speaker 1: by Senator Bertie Sanders. You're also a cosponders. I believe
Speaker 1: it will totally eliminate private insurance. So for people out
Speaker 1: there who like their insurance, they don't get to keep it. Well, listen,
Speaker 1: the idea is that everyone gets access to medical care
Speaker 1: and you don't have to go through the process of
Speaker 1: going through an insurance company, having them give you approval,
Speaker 1: going through the paperwork, all of the delay that may require.
Speaker 1: Who of us has not had that situation where you
Speaker 1: got to wait for approval and the doctor says, well,
Speaker 1: I don't know if your insurance company is going to
Speaker 1: cover this. Let's eliminate all of that. Let's move on.
Speaker 1: I want to ask you about something you said that night.
Speaker 1: You said on stage with me in January that when
Speaker 1: it comes to private insurance, quote, let's eliminate all of that.
Speaker 1: Let's move on. Yes, now you later said we don't
Speaker 1: need to get rid of all private insurance. So but
Speaker 1: let's clear that. Well, we were together and you'll remember
Speaker 1: and roll the tape tell you that, Well, you support
Speaker 1: the Bernie Sanders Bill, which essentially support medicare for all.
Speaker 1: But I really do need to clear up what happened
Speaker 1: on that stage. It was in the context of saying,
Speaker 1: let's get rid of all the bureaucracy. Let's get all
Speaker 1: of the way, not the insurance company. No, that's not
Speaker 1: what I meant. I know it was interpreted that way.
Speaker 1: If you watch the tape, I think you'll see that
Speaker 1: there are obviously many interpretations of what I said. What
Speaker 1: I meant is, let's get rid of the bureaucracy as
Speaker 1: it relates it's insurance. No, no, no, it does not
Speaker 1: get rid of insurance. It does not get rid of insurance.
Speaker 1: And listen, and let me just tell you where I am.
Speaker 1: Let's tell you where I am. All right, I support
Speaker 1: Medicare for All. It is my preferred as it possible.
Speaker 1: You not Bernie Sanders bill. I support the bill. Okay,
Speaker 1: I support the bill. The bill gets rid of private
Speaker 1: insurance for everything. That doesn't get rid of supplemental insurance
Speaker 1: cosmetic surgery, but for all. It doesn't get rid of
Speaker 1: all insurance. Okay, he doesn't get rid of all insurance,
Speaker 1: but for all essential healthcare benefits. But why ask the question?
Speaker 1: Why the question? If the answer to that question is
Speaker 1: because Medicare for all and the vision of what it
Speaker 1: will be includes an expansion of coverage. So Medicare for
Speaker 1: All will include vision, It will include dental it will
Speaker 1: include hearing aids. So you support giving universal healthcare and
Speaker 1: medicare for all to people who are in this country illegally.
Speaker 1: Let me just be very clear about this. I'm opposed
Speaker 1: to any policy that would deny in our country any
Speaker 1: human being from access to public safety, public education, or
Speaker 1: public health. Period. So what is your vision for a
Speaker 1: one stage solution that meets both Palestinian and Israeli Jewish
Speaker 1: national aspirations? Absolutely, and let me tell you. I mean,
Speaker 1: for me, just I think two weeks ago or so
Speaker 1: we celebrated or just it took a moment I think
Speaker 1: in our country to remember the Holocaust, and there's you know,
Speaker 1: it's a kind of a calming feeling. I always tell
Speaker 1: folks when I think of the Holocaust and the tragedy
Speaker 1: of Holocaust, and the fact that it was my ancestors,
Speaker 1: Palestinians who lost their land and some lost their lives,
Speaker 1: their livelihood, the human dignity, their existence in many ways
Speaker 1: have been wiped out, and some people's passport, I mean,
Speaker 1: just all of it was in the name of trying
Speaker 1: to create a safe haven for Jews, post the Holocaust,
Speaker 1: post the tragedy, and herfic persecution of Jews across the
Speaker 1: world at that time. And I love the fact that
Speaker 1: it was my ancestors that provided that right in many ways,
Speaker 1: but they did it in a way that took their
Speaker 1: human dignity away, right, and it was forced on them.
Speaker 1: And so when I think about one state, I think
Speaker 1: about the fact that why couldn't we do it in
Speaker 1: a better way where and I don't want people to
Speaker 1: do it in the name of Judaism, just like I
Speaker 1: don't want people to use Islam in that way. It
Speaker 1: has to be done in a way of values, around
Speaker 1: equality and around the fact that you should impress others
Speaker 1: so that you can feel free and safe. Why can't
Speaker 1: we all be free and safe together? What is this
Speaker 1: calming feeling that Congresswoman Phalib is talking about when referring
Speaker 1: to her thoughts about the Holocaust and the mass slaughter
Speaker 1: of six million plus human beings, you know, and the
Speaker 1: impact on the politics and uh, the ancestral whole homeland
Speaker 1: of the Jewish people is Israel. That's not even an
Speaker 1: issue that is in dispute, and uh, you know, it's
Speaker 1: it's it's it's pretty shocking that you know, this keeps
Speaker 1: happening with the new extreme radical Modern Democratic Party. And
Speaker 1: you know, remember the the state of un partition plan
Speaker 1: was nineteen forty eight and the day that Bengorian, the
Speaker 1: first Prime Minister of Israel, reached out his hand in
Speaker 1: general peace and neighborliness, and they were attacked the next day,
Speaker 1: and they were attacked in sixty seven, then seventy three,
Speaker 1: and they are under rocket fire attack almost on a
Speaker 1: weekly basis, and then some But I mean, it's it's
Speaker 1: beyond understanding. Then we moved to Kamala Harris joining her
Speaker 1: rivals and favoring free healthcare for illegal immigrants. That now
Speaker 1: is a staple I guess of those on the left,
Speaker 1: and Harris saying take away Americans' health insurance and make
Speaker 1: them pay for illegal immigrants healthcare, and then secondly pledging
Speaker 1: to criminalize private gun sales via executive action. I mean,
Speaker 1: it's it's they've gone off the rails. The whole party
Speaker 1: anyway here to react to it, not stuff that the
Speaker 1: mainstream media is too interested in covering, apparently. Joe Concha.
Speaker 1: He is a fellow host on w o ward the
Speaker 1: News and Talk of New York, New Jersey and Long
Speaker 1: Island every weeknight right after this show airs, and then,
Speaker 1: of course a frequent guest on Hannity, how are you
Speaker 1: certain works? For the hell? What's going on? Well, besides
Speaker 1: feeling like we're living in Seattle, then New York. I
Speaker 1: think we're doing okay. When this may, we're gonna stop
Speaker 1: here to New York entity. My God, tell me about it.
Speaker 1: It's ruining. But to your tier point, Oh, go ahead,
Speaker 1: it's ruining. It's ruining my already bad golf game. A
Speaker 1: few times I can play for you. Shot a fifty
Speaker 1: four on what nine? Yeah, it's about to say the
Speaker 1: front nine. You took away my punchline. Yeah, but looked
Speaker 1: at all those cliffs you play, I would think the
Speaker 1: happiest person on the planet when you hear a Joe
Speaker 1: Biden or Elizabeth Warren or Kamala Harris or to Leave
Speaker 1: or even Acasio Cortez or the last two aren't running
Speaker 1: for president, but they represent where the party is. Is
Speaker 1: President Trump because it gives him such a clear contrast
Speaker 1: between this is what socialism looks like, this is what
Speaker 1: the far left looks like, and then this is what
Speaker 1: my record looks like and what I want to accomplish
Speaker 1: in four years. So look, I think from at least
Speaker 1: a political perspective, these sort of ideas only benefit the
Speaker 1: president if you look at every pole. For instance, Sean,
Speaker 1: when it comes to providing healthcare to illegal immigrants, an
Speaker 1: overwhelming majority of Americans, not just Republicans, but independence even
Speaker 1: Democrats say that's a very bad idea because that will
Speaker 1: destroy our economy. And by the way, there's this thing
Speaker 1: called the emergency Room that if you ever had any
Speaker 1: sort of emergency health problem, that you will be treated,
Speaker 1: regardless of whether you're illegal or not. So it's not
Speaker 1: like people are dying in the streets. You do have
Speaker 1: that access. But I remember on WR and thanks for
Speaker 1: mentioning the radio show when Joe Biden said that last week,
Speaker 1: we've took calls on it, and we had Democrats calling saying,
Speaker 1: you know, this is the type of thing that is
Speaker 1: going to force me to vote for President Trump coming
Speaker 1: from Democrats because they think it's such a radical idea
Speaker 1: and so bad for the country and it's not where
Speaker 1: we are right now as a country. Well, why would
Speaker 1: Nancy Pelosi after the Omar comments, now the to lead comments,
Speaker 1: and by the way, not the first for either of them.
Speaker 1: But I guess when it comes to bashing Israel, it
Speaker 1: looks like Omar and Talib they have a very high
Speaker 1: a friend in high places, because as Representative Lee Zelden
Speaker 1: was on Fox and Friends on Sunday, said that the
Speaker 1: House Speaker Nancy Pelosi made a bad call by allowing
Speaker 1: a Texas e mom with a history of anti Semitic
Speaker 1: comments to deliver the noon prayer in the House of
Speaker 1: Representatives last week. Why would she allow that? Yeah, yeah,
Speaker 1: look picture it this way. Let's say a President Trump
Speaker 1: allowed that same amount to make those comments before a luncheon.
Speaker 1: Then suddenly you'd see a lot of media coverage. What
Speaker 1: are you around that. It's simply a matter of variables.
Speaker 1: If one person does it, whether it's Pelosi, whether it's
Speaker 1: to leave, they tend to get past because well, you know,
Speaker 1: in Talib's case, she's a minority, she's a woman, she's
Speaker 1: a freshman, so she's still learning her way. All the
Speaker 1: excuses are made. But then if a Republican says the
Speaker 1: same exact then you have a completely totally different reaction.
Speaker 1: And that's why so many people don't trust the media anymore,
Speaker 1: because there's no consistency in terms of coverage because it's
Speaker 1: all based on what letters. But Nancy Pelosi invites a
Speaker 1: guy that posts an image on social media supporting the
Speaker 1: Muslim Brotherhood. Now remember the Mohammad Morsey who was once
Speaker 1: the head of Egypt. He was a former head of
Speaker 1: the Muslim Brotherhood who once referred to Jews as the
Speaker 1: sentence of apes and pigs, and he was rewarded with
Speaker 1: billions of dollars in Obama Biden cash and military equipment.
Speaker 1: In this particular case, you have this a mom that
Speaker 1: Nancy Pelosi brought in that you know, he's posting images
Speaker 1: supporting the Brotherhood in twenty fourteen or in a conflict
Speaker 1: between Israel and the terrorist group Hamas that has in
Speaker 1: their charter the destruction of Israel. He posted on Twitter,
Speaker 1: God willing on this blessed night as the third Antifada begins,
Speaker 1: the beginning of the end of Zionism is here. May
Speaker 1: Allah help us overcome this monster and protect the innocence
Speaker 1: innocent of the world and accept the murdered as martyrs.
Speaker 1: And following years, you know shows a video purporting the
Speaker 1: show conflicts between Palestinians and Israeli soldiers with the comment
Speaker 1: want to know what it's like to live under Nazis.
Speaker 1: I'm like, Wow, what has happened to this party here? Yeah,
Speaker 1: And you would think that Nancy Pelosi would be besieged
Speaker 1: with questions as far as how can you allow us
Speaker 1: to happen? And I don't get this, by the way,
Speaker 1: and maybe you can answer this for me, Sean, but
Speaker 1: the last couple of elections, and particularly in twenty sixteen,
Speaker 1: how do Democrats get seventy one percent of the Jewish
Speaker 1: vote given that Republicans obviously are much more. I mean,
Speaker 1: you can't even compare the two insupport of Israel. I
Speaker 1: don't know the answer to the question. Now, I don't
Speaker 1: get it, but I can tell you that this hatred
Speaker 1: and the rise of anti Semitism in Europe and now
Speaker 1: obviously the US is real. This is lelys. I mean,
Speaker 1: look at what's happening in synagogues right in San Diego
Speaker 1: and Pittsburgh right scary. It's getting bad. And that that
Speaker 1: in the Democratic Party, considering the comments that are coming
Speaker 1: from to leave to the world, and Nancy Pelosi keeping
Speaker 1: these people on committees not punishing them in any way,
Speaker 1: speaks volumes, because hey, those are actions right that you
Speaker 1: could take that. That's certainly something they should be questionable
Speaker 1: battle a lot more. But as you said, we're just
Speaker 1: not seeing it. We're not seeing it at all. All right, So,
Speaker 1: of all the twenty twenty candidates, who do you see
Speaker 1: emerging as the leader? I mean, some people say Biden,
Speaker 1: but I think Biden between China and Ukraine and his son.
Speaker 1: You know, how did his son, who has no experience
Speaker 1: whatsoever in the type of equity dealings that he ended
Speaker 1: up doing in China when he flew on Air Force
Speaker 1: two and his father, how does he do a deal
Speaker 1: worth those hundreds of millions of dollars? How does he
Speaker 1: go to Ukraine? He's under investigation by a prosecutor there,
Speaker 1: and Joe Biden holds American tax dollars hostile un told
Speaker 1: the guy that's investigating his son gets fired and gives
Speaker 1: him six hours to do it, and they did it.
Speaker 1: Some of those are old questions if Joe Biden should
Speaker 1: be asked, But have you seen Joe Biden and sit
Speaker 1: down for anything resembling not tough interview? Yet? You know
Speaker 1: the view that basically the extended it. So, yeah, he
Speaker 1: seems to be playing like, well, you know, I'm thirty
Speaker 1: four points ahead in some polls in terms of in
Speaker 1: which I find incredible. By the way, because if Biden, honestly,
Speaker 1: I've said this before, I'll say it again. I don't
Speaker 1: know what's at his core, what are his principles? Who
Speaker 1: is Joe Biden? He's been in politics for four decades
Speaker 1: and I don't know who this person is. So when
Speaker 1: I hear that he's a centrist, but then I hear
Speaker 1: that we talked about still allow undocumented immigrants of free
Speaker 1: access to healthcare of limited and then you say, well,
Speaker 1: wait a minute, that's a pretty far left idea. So
Speaker 1: do I think he'll emerge as the nominee. I don't know.
Speaker 1: He's never done well as a candidate. He's not particularly
Speaker 1: a good speaker. But I think once he has, maybe
Speaker 1: Neil Kennock can you know, write him a speech again
Speaker 1: and he can plagiarize the whole thing and as he
Speaker 1: did before and one of his earlier runs, all right,
Speaker 1: stay right there, Joe concha with the hell W radio
Speaker 1: in New York. You know, it's funny because I don't
Speaker 1: see anybody stopping that have been lying, caught lying for
Speaker 1: over two plus years and advancing conspiracy theories and hoaxes,
Speaker 1: and I don't see any sign that they change their ways.
Speaker 1: I just see signs that they're doubling down on the
Speaker 1: same conspiracies with absolutely no justification. They're not doing any
Speaker 1: investigative work into the deep state and the abuse of power,
Speaker 1: where the evidence is now becoming overwhelming and incontrovertible. They
Speaker 1: seem now to be sort of transitioning, well, what can
Speaker 1: we get Trump on now. Let's let's demand the irs
Speaker 1: get his taxes. Now, we're going to weaponize the irs
Speaker 1: and turn that against the Trump's and their entire family
Speaker 1: and anybody that likes them. So I guess the media
Speaker 1: is just going to continue to be the liars that
Speaker 1: they are. It's the pivot. Sean Right couldn't find anything
Speaker 1: on Russia collusion, so let's find collusion between say Trump
Speaker 1: and Bill Barr in terms of a cover up in
Speaker 1: the one percent of the Bulla report that hasn't been released,
Speaker 1: the part that's been redacted. They can't really is because
Speaker 1: you know, that would be illegal because it's grand jury testimony.
Speaker 1: So if it isn't Russia, then that was never something
Speaker 1: that to many in our media generally cared about They
Speaker 1: cared about the means to the end, which was that
Speaker 1: could be used to remove the president. And now that
Speaker 1: taxes seem to be a very big deal. But as
Speaker 1: you saw last week, Sean, that New York Times story
Speaker 1: about how he lost more than a billion dollars from
Speaker 1: nineteen eighty five to nineteen ninety four, that had zero impact.
Speaker 1: In fact, I think it made the president look good
Speaker 1: because everybody loves a comeback. And the fact is that
Speaker 1: he admitted that he lost billions or billions excuse me,
Speaker 1: on The Apprentice, he admitted it in his book, and
Speaker 1: there was tons of press covers because I've lived in
Speaker 1: New York my whole life. New York Daily News to Post,
Speaker 1: the New York Times documented very well going on at
Speaker 1: that time, says he says it in his own voice.
Speaker 1: He's told the story many times. All right, well more
Speaker 1: this week, Thanks Joe Concha. You'll hear him on about
Speaker 1: a half hour from right now on New York's WR
Speaker 1: Quick Break. We'll come back wide open phones as we
Speaker 1: continue the Sean Hannity show. No public evidence that the
Speaker 1: vice president former Vice press took any inappropriate action to
Speaker 1: help his son, But was it right for Hunter Biden
Speaker 1: to take a job like that in Ukraine while his
Speaker 1: father was engaging diplomacy there. I don't know the circumstances
Speaker 1: in which he took the job, but I can't say
Speaker 1: this visa Joe Biden. There's no evidence, nor has there
Speaker 1: ever been any evidence that he was doing anything but
Speaker 1: trying to get the Ukraine government to crack down on corruption.
Speaker 1: We're providing generous support to Ukraine, We're providing defensive weapons
Speaker 1: to Ukraine. We want Ukraine to be successful, and it's
Speaker 1: conflict with Russia. But part of that is having a
Speaker 1: government that the people of Ukraine are willing to fight
Speaker 1: for and protect, and they've had an endemic corruption problem.
Speaker 1: That's what Joe Biden was trying to address. So going
Speaker 1: after his son is just a method of going after
Speaker 1: someone the president believes is his most formidable opponent. So yes,
Speaker 1: let the president go after him, but don't seek the
Speaker 1: help of a foreign government in your election. And if
Speaker 1: this isn't criminal, and Bob Muller said he could not
Speaker 1: prove all the elements of a crime, then maybe we
Speaker 1: need to change the elements of that crime, because we
Speaker 1: cannot make this the new norm that if you can't
Speaker 1: win an election on your own. It's fine to seek
Speaker 1: help from a foreign power. You're at the president right there.
Speaker 1: He says you all are going to elect him in
Speaker 1: twenty twenty. That's not going to happen. And I don't
Speaker 1: think this country could survive in other four years of
Speaker 1: a president like this who gets up every day trying
Speaker 1: to find new and inventive ways to divide us. He
Speaker 1: doesn't seem to understand that a fundamental aspect of his
Speaker 1: job is to try to make us a more perfect union.
Speaker 1: But that's not at all where he's coming from. And
Speaker 1: he's going to be defeated. He has to be defeated
Speaker 1: because I don't know how much more our democratic institutions
Speaker 1: can take of this kind of attack on the rule
Speaker 1: of law. Last year, you wrote an our bed saying
Speaker 1: Democrats don't take the bait on impeachment. You said that
Speaker 1: if it were a post scene as a political partisan exercise,
Speaker 1: it simply couldn't work, and that Democrats shouldn't pursue it.
Speaker 1: Is he getting to the point where you're gonna have
Speaker 1: to change your mind? Well, you know, I was arguing
Speaker 1: a year and a half ago. Went a wrote that
Speaker 1: up ed that we ought to wait to see what
Speaker 1: Muller reports. Now we have the Muller report now, although
Speaker 1: we still haven't heard from the man himself, and I
Speaker 1: think the first priority has to be get Muller before
Speaker 1: the Congress in American people. That's going to happen. I
Speaker 1: am convinced it's going to happen. That is an exorable.
Speaker 1: The American people have every right to hear what the
Speaker 1: man who did the investigation has to say. And we
Speaker 1: now know we certainly can't rely on the Attorney general
Speaker 1: who misrepresented his conclusions. All right, there is the cowardly
Speaker 1: Shift on with I guess George Stephanopoulos, so the weekend, Um,
Speaker 1: I gotta tell you, these people have all lost their minds.
Speaker 1: They've all it's it's like invasion of the body snatchers
Speaker 1: on every level. I mean, the only guy that we
Speaker 1: have on tape colluding with Russia is is the cowardly Shift.
Speaker 1: Why doesn't he or Nadler or Maxim Waters or any
Speaker 1: of these people take us up on our invitation? Why
Speaker 1: are you failing in your mission as you're right, executive producer,
Speaker 1: failing to get you are? I mean, look, I've told
Speaker 1: you to get them on the show. I repeated it.
Speaker 1: I've offered them a ton of airtime. Why won't they
Speaker 1: come on this show? I guess because I suck at
Speaker 1: my job. I'm gonna try my best to get better.
Speaker 1: I want to know what they're saying to you. Oh
Speaker 1: they don't respond, Well, you call their office. It goes.
Speaker 1: You know what I'm gonna do. Why don't you say
Speaker 1: you from MSNBC. I'm gonna say, I'm Olgabusa. I'm gonna
Speaker 1: call Adam, and I'm gonna say, Adam, it's all gone
Speaker 1: by you. So listen, and what is the night? What's
Speaker 1: the name? Very important? Materials, very important, But what is
Speaker 1: the name? What is the nature of the of the materials?
Speaker 1: Also pictures the naked Trump naked? Did Vladimir hear about it?
Speaker 1: Vladimir knows, but of course I Vladimir he look every
Speaker 1: day at the naked pick to the Trump every day.
Speaker 1: And so we also know who was a mediator between
Speaker 1: Trump and Russian government who met with ex advisor of Trump,
Speaker 1: mister Flynn. It's the Russian singer, very famous singer, Arcadio Kupnik,
Speaker 1: who met with mister Flynn on Brighton Beach in Brooklyn
Speaker 1: in a special Russian cafee Langeron. What's the name of
Speaker 1: the Langeron Langeron? Yes, it's an or the Brighton Beach Okay,
Speaker 1: And it's a special right, it's a Russian district in Brooklyn.
Speaker 1: And do you know what was discussed? They discussed many things,
Speaker 1: but the most interesting thing is they use the special
Speaker 1: They use the special password before before their meetings, when
Speaker 1: they met each other, they say it, whether it's good
Speaker 1: on Jerry Basso scare, whether trains is good? Yeah? And where?
Speaker 1: Whether it's good on Jerry Bassosca. There is a name
Speaker 1: of a street in Odessa. Did you did you hear? Yes?
Speaker 1: I did so. It's a street in Odessa. Yes. The
Speaker 1: code word is whether it's good on Zarabasta Darrybasovskaya jayak
Speaker 1: okay And I'll have my staff fall up to get
Speaker 1: spellings and more details on Yes. And the second part
Speaker 1: of their best word was it rains again on Brighton Beach.
Speaker 1: It rains again on Brighton Beach. Yes. On that meeting,
Speaker 1: Kupning told Flynn that all those compromising materials will never
Speaker 1: at least if Trump will cancel at Russian sanctions. Okay, Um, Well, obviously,
Speaker 1: we would welcome a chance to get copies of those recordings. Um,
Speaker 1: So we will try to work with the FBI to
Speaker 1: figure out, along with your staff, how we can obtain
Speaker 1: copies of those Okay, And so Busava met with Trump
Speaker 1: in in New York at some point after the twenty
Speaker 1: thirteen Miss Universe, Yes, agin absolutely, and she got compromising
Speaker 1: materials on TUP after their short relations Okay, and what's
Speaker 1: the nature of the compromise, Well, there were pictures of
Speaker 1: naked Trump, okay, and so Putin was made aware of
Speaker 1: the availability of the compromising material Yes, of course, Buzava
Speaker 1: shared those materials with sab Checking. Subject shares those materials
Speaker 1: with Putin because she's a god daughter of Putin, and
Speaker 1: Puttin decided to press on Trump and the materials that
Speaker 1: you can provide to the committee or to the FBI.
Speaker 1: Would they corroborate this allegation, Sure, of course. When they
Speaker 1: were in Ukraine, we got their conversation by the phone
Speaker 1: where they're discussed those compromising materials. We are ready to
Speaker 1: provide it to FBI. So you have recordings of both
Speaker 1: sab Check and Buseva where they're discussing the compromising material
Speaker 1: on mister Trump. Absolutely, I'm just going to tell him
Speaker 1: that I have pictures of everyone naked and that if
Speaker 1: he wants to see them, he should come on this show,
Speaker 1: and I'll tell Nadler I have all the evidence, and
Speaker 1: then I have personal conversations with Mueller on tape and
Speaker 1: all time, Maxine, all the time. I gotta tell you,
Speaker 1: it is pretty scary that they just keep doubling down
Speaker 1: on dumb and stupid they really do. You know, maybe
Speaker 1: I should be the one eating fried chicken because I
Speaker 1: think these guys are scared. I don't think the Democrats, yeah,
Speaker 1: because they wanted bar to go. Two things they want
Speaker 1: out of the Attorney General. The first one is why
Speaker 1: they hold them in contempt because he won't break the law.
Speaker 1: You're not allowed to give over grand jury information. But
Speaker 1: there is plenty of time if these people get out
Speaker 1: of the comfort of their of their meeting rooms, walk
Speaker 1: over and see the unredacted Mueller part. And the only
Speaker 1: thing that's redacted is part of what seven lines and
Speaker 1: one line. Let's talk about the real problem here for
Speaker 1: the American people you talk about, let me talk about that.
Speaker 1: Let's talk amongst ourselves here. So the Muller investigation costs
Speaker 1: the American people twenty five point two million dollars, took
Speaker 1: over two years. We investigated everybody and their mother, their cousin,
Speaker 1: their uncle, their uncle's friends. It was ridiculous. And now
Speaker 1: that they have nothing better to do instead of doing
Speaker 1: what is actually needed, which is work that would help
Speaker 1: the American people, like I don't know, lowering taxes, better
Speaker 1: healthcare opportunities. They have to keep this alive or there's
Speaker 1: no way they're gonna win twenty twenty because the twenty
Speaker 1: nine million people they have running don't have a thought
Speaker 1: between them. So the only thing they have is the
Speaker 1: Mueller is the Muller Council. That's it. That's all they have.
Speaker 1: This is the case that they're going to ride their
Speaker 1: little their ships on all the way through twenty twenty.
Speaker 1: They're gonna stil right into the night because Trump's going
Speaker 1: to spank them. Okay, then let's get to Kurt and
Speaker 1: you talk. Kurt, how are you glad you called KNRS
Speaker 1: the home of Crown Burger and rod Arquet. You can't
Speaker 1: get a better combination of Crown Burger. For those of
Speaker 1: you that don't know, they put pastrami and a ton
Speaker 1: of cheese on this burger. It is unique, like no
Speaker 1: burger you've ever had before. How are you, Kurt? Do
Speaker 1: you go to Crownburger? Good Sir? I do many times. Yeah,
Speaker 1: I know there's only one Crown Burger you have it.
Speaker 1: I don't have one. When you need to come back
Speaker 1: out to Utah, I'll take you to lunch. I'd love
Speaker 1: to do that anyway. What's going on? Hey, I'm I'm
Speaker 1: getting a little concerned about how the media and the
Speaker 1: Democrats are now trying to spin bar and his investigations,
Speaker 1: going after the investigators as political instead of you know,
Speaker 1: actually going after the truth and righting wrongs and you know,
Speaker 1: going by the rule of law, they're now just making
Speaker 1: it all out to be political. That's all the media's
Speaker 1: reporting is that all Trump's just going after political opponents
Speaker 1: or you know people ea like can crap like that.
Speaker 1: I was wondering what your thoughts are about that, and
Speaker 1: how can we combat that. Listen, there's only one antidote
Speaker 1: to this problem, and we got to keep It's got
Speaker 1: to be a dumpster dive to find the truth. All
Speaker 1: of the information is there, all of it is forthcoming,
Speaker 1: and you know, but because of you know, in investigatory
Speaker 1: rules and standards, you do the investigation first. Certain things
Speaker 1: now we know are the evidence is overwhelming and incontrovertible.
Speaker 1: You know, like we can look at Nadler and Democrats
Speaker 1: in the House Judicial they want the Attorney General to
Speaker 1: break the law. They're not going to do that. The
Speaker 1: FBI blatantly lied about Christopher Steel to the Feizer Court
Speaker 1: because we know of two instances now where they were warned,
Speaker 1: one by the State Department employee that had enough gust
Speaker 1: out of and smarts to tell the BA who steal was.
Speaker 1: In the other case, of course, they were warned by
Speaker 1: Bruce Orr. You know, all top Democrats. They don't want
Speaker 1: this story coming out. But if we you know, if
Speaker 1: bar doesn't do his job, if he doesn't stand by
Speaker 1: the rule of law, if we don't stop those people
Speaker 1: that committed a fraud against the court, a conspiracy to
Speaker 1: commit fraud now against the court because it was premeditated,
Speaker 1: If those people that rigged Hillary's investigation are not held accountable,
Speaker 1: if those that tried to unseat a sitting president, if
Speaker 1: those that unmasked you know, a three hundred and fifty
Speaker 1: percent increase in unmasking. If we don't get to the
Speaker 1: bottom of it, then would it's going to continue to happen,
Speaker 1: except next time they might be a little smarter about
Speaker 1: it and getting less trouble. Now, if Hillary ever won,
Speaker 1: we wouldn't know all of this, It would all have
Speaker 1: been buried. But I'm telling you this is a real,
Speaker 1: clear present danger to our way of life in the
Speaker 1: United States of America. Anyway. Thanks. Kurt Howard is in
Speaker 1: North Carolina on the Sean Hannity Show. What's going on?
Speaker 1: How are you, Sean? How you doing? Thanks for taking
Speaker 1: my call and thanks for doing what everything you do
Speaker 1: every day? Well, thank you, my friend. The five as
Speaker 1: a court judges, they've got me really concerned. They've been
Speaker 1: lied to over and over again. What they have like
Speaker 1: four renewals of the warrants and it was all done
Speaker 1: through wise and you don't hear a word from them.
Speaker 1: Are they just as deep in the swamp as the
Speaker 1: rest of DC. I'm just telling you from my perspective, Yeah, yeah, Listen, anybody,
Speaker 1: there's no American that gets away with with manipulating and
Speaker 1: lying to a court like this, especially when it says
Speaker 1: at the top as Jason Javid said, you know, Congressman
Speaker 1: Ratcliffe saw the fives applications. It says verified at the
Speaker 1: top of the application. It's not a surprise here they
Speaker 1: it's an unverifiable document we now know. So they're stuck
Speaker 1: and they put their signature to it. And they were
Speaker 1: all warned ahead of time. So now when we eventually
Speaker 1: get to see it, and I assume probably the Attorney
Speaker 1: General by now has it. Certainly, I would expect the
Speaker 1: Inspector General has it. Certainly that's going to be a
Speaker 1: part of his report. And this woman Haafling Cavalac who
Speaker 1: worked at the State Department warning them and Bruce or
Speaker 1: telling everybody that that means they did it anyway. They
Speaker 1: conspired to commit a fraud on the court to spy
Speaker 1: on an opposition party candidate after they rigged an investigation
Speaker 1: into the favored candidate, which was Hillary Clinton. They used
Speaker 1: it to rig a presidential election and then undo and
Speaker 1: unseat a duly elected president. That's what happened. That's the truth.
Speaker 1: That's what the media cannot get right because it doesn't
Speaker 1: fit their agenda. It means that Donald Trump, the whole
Speaker 1: process was designed to rig it against him anyone anyway,
Speaker 1: and look at the results. All right, that's gonna wrap
Speaker 1: things up with today Hannity Tonight, Ninetiestern, look at this lineup.
Speaker 1: Trey Gouty, car rove ted Cruz rights previous will join us,
Speaker 1: Larry Elder, Pam Bandi Ninetiestern Say DVR, Hannity, Fox News.
Speaker 1: And Yes, we will expose who knew what when within
Speaker 1: the deep State the FBI about the Steel dossier as
Speaker 1: more details become available. Ninetiestern Tonight on Hannity. We'll see
Speaker 1: you then back here tomorrow