WEBVTT - Draft Show: Combine Review; Zeke At Pick 4?

0:00:11.000 --> 0:00:15.680
<v Speaker 1>This is the Dallas Cowboys dot Com Draft Showboys on

0:00:16.239 --> 0:00:19.840
<v Speaker 1>your war room for insider news and draft analysis from

0:00:19.920 --> 0:00:23.160
<v Speaker 1>deep within the confines of Cowboys Headquarters at Valley Rant.

0:00:23.239 --> 0:00:27.040
<v Speaker 1>The Dallas Cowboys Select by Ran Joe and now your

0:00:27.120 --> 0:00:32.760
<v Speaker 1>hosts Dane Brugler, David Hellman and Brian brought us. We

0:00:32.840 --> 0:00:35.000
<v Speaker 1>are back here at the Draft Show from the s

0:00:35.040 --> 0:00:43.040
<v Speaker 1>TOWBC Mortgage Studios after a week in Indianapolis investigating and

0:00:43.159 --> 0:00:46.839
<v Speaker 1>now about to educate our listeners on what's going on

0:00:46.880 --> 0:00:49.360
<v Speaker 1>all things in NFL Draft. We're getting closer, Dane, you

0:00:49.360 --> 0:00:53.040
<v Speaker 1>know how many days to the draft? It's like fifty

0:00:53.040 --> 0:00:57.560
<v Speaker 1>five something like that. It's fifty some odd days. Yeah,

0:00:57.640 --> 0:01:01.200
<v Speaker 1>how about that? It's March kind of crazy. Brian brought

0:01:01.280 --> 0:01:05.839
<v Speaker 1>us here with Dame Bruegler from CBS Sports and Dallas

0:01:05.880 --> 0:01:10.640
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys dot Com and David Hellman from Dallas Cowboys dot Com.

0:01:10.760 --> 0:01:15.240
<v Speaker 1>Kent Garrison, Executive Producer, like to welcome everybody to our

0:01:15.280 --> 0:01:18.240
<v Speaker 1>show today. A couple of different ways. You could get

0:01:18.280 --> 0:01:22.000
<v Speaker 1>a hold of us on Twitter. We take questions. That's

0:01:22.000 --> 0:01:26.840
<v Speaker 1>our route, that's our choice at the Draft Show. If

0:01:26.840 --> 0:01:29.280
<v Speaker 1>you have a question for the show, that's the best

0:01:29.280 --> 0:01:32.920
<v Speaker 1>way to get involved. When we get to the twenty mark,

0:01:33.000 --> 0:01:35.920
<v Speaker 1>Dave Hellman will take over the show and he will

0:01:36.200 --> 0:01:38.520
<v Speaker 1>answer all those questions. We also take calls, as you

0:01:38.600 --> 0:01:41.280
<v Speaker 1>notice on the right side of your screen eight eight

0:01:41.319 --> 0:01:45.240
<v Speaker 1>eight eight five five two two nine seven. That would

0:01:45.240 --> 0:01:48.200
<v Speaker 1>be another way that we can get your opinion or

0:01:48.320 --> 0:01:50.920
<v Speaker 1>whether you agree with us, disagree with us, or just

0:01:51.640 --> 0:01:55.560
<v Speaker 1>fire general comment at us. Guys. We did just get

0:01:55.560 --> 0:01:58.280
<v Speaker 1>back from the Combine and we kind of tied some

0:01:58.360 --> 0:02:02.080
<v Speaker 1>things up when it was over were on when we

0:02:02.080 --> 0:02:05.600
<v Speaker 1>were done there on Saturday. But just Dane, I just

0:02:05.640 --> 0:02:08.080
<v Speaker 1>want to maybe get a thought or two about the

0:02:08.160 --> 0:02:11.400
<v Speaker 1>combine we all talk about, for the medical for the

0:02:11.440 --> 0:02:15.000
<v Speaker 1>information or anything else stand out at the combine for you,

0:02:15.480 --> 0:02:18.480
<v Speaker 1>so much information comes at you. Now a week later,

0:02:18.600 --> 0:02:21.480
<v Speaker 1>we're trying to figure out all the data. What does

0:02:21.480 --> 0:02:23.560
<v Speaker 1>it mean? How do we apply it? Uh? You know,

0:02:23.600 --> 0:02:27.040
<v Speaker 1>do players live up to expectations? Did something fall short

0:02:27.440 --> 0:02:30.320
<v Speaker 1>the medical information you mentioned? That's really you know, we

0:02:30.880 --> 0:02:33.480
<v Speaker 1>mentioned this time after time, but that's the main reason

0:02:33.520 --> 0:02:36.760
<v Speaker 1>for the combine, That's why I was created, and really

0:02:36.800 --> 0:02:42.240
<v Speaker 1>that's the numerous uno reason why NFL teams are so

0:02:42.360 --> 0:02:45.799
<v Speaker 1>focused on the Combine is the medical information and Jalen Smith,

0:02:46.080 --> 0:02:49.960
<v Speaker 1>we talked about him unfortunate. It is unfortunate. Miles Jack

0:02:50.720 --> 0:02:53.560
<v Speaker 1>another unfortunate. It is it's uh, you hate it for

0:02:53.560 --> 0:02:56.280
<v Speaker 1>these talented players and Miles Jack. We don't know as

0:02:56.360 --> 0:02:58.400
<v Speaker 1>much as we know about Jalen Smith. Miles Jack is

0:02:58.440 --> 0:03:01.440
<v Speaker 1>a more wait and see type of type of guy,

0:03:01.520 --> 0:03:05.040
<v Speaker 1>type of injury right now. But I feel like we

0:03:06.040 --> 0:03:07.639
<v Speaker 1>I don't think there were any big surprises up the

0:03:07.639 --> 0:03:11.680
<v Speaker 1>combine in terms of players maybe performing better than we thought.

0:03:11.880 --> 0:03:13.640
<v Speaker 1>I think, you know, through all the tape study and

0:03:13.680 --> 0:03:16.000
<v Speaker 1>all the draft shows we've done talked about these players

0:03:16.160 --> 0:03:18.639
<v Speaker 1>right Senior Bowl. You know, I think we had a

0:03:18.680 --> 0:03:20.200
<v Speaker 1>good grasp on all of them. I don't think any

0:03:20.240 --> 0:03:23.160
<v Speaker 1>one truly surprised us. But nonetheless a lot of good

0:03:23.160 --> 0:03:25.000
<v Speaker 1>info here and it definitely need to go back to

0:03:25.000 --> 0:03:26.520
<v Speaker 1>the tape on some of these players. Yeah, but we

0:03:26.680 --> 0:03:28.880
<v Speaker 1>also talked about here on the draft show as well,

0:03:29.160 --> 0:03:32.200
<v Speaker 1>these wide receivers. Everybody was making a big deal about

0:03:32.960 --> 0:03:35.880
<v Speaker 1>the lack of say, time speed, right, you know, I

0:03:36.240 --> 0:03:39.800
<v Speaker 1>felt like all along apparently the slowest yeah average time

0:03:39.800 --> 0:03:42.440
<v Speaker 1>in eleven years. As we've gone along here, we felt

0:03:42.480 --> 0:03:44.800
<v Speaker 1>like that, you know, we've kind of again talked about

0:03:44.880 --> 0:03:47.680
<v Speaker 1>that there's these receivers, you got to figure them out.

0:03:47.680 --> 0:03:50.400
<v Speaker 1>They're kind of all lumped together and can they break

0:03:50.440 --> 0:03:53.200
<v Speaker 1>away from each other. We feel like there's maybe a

0:03:53.200 --> 0:03:55.880
<v Speaker 1>couple of guys treadwill being on the top, depending on

0:03:55.920 --> 0:03:58.880
<v Speaker 1>who you like. The second guy, you know, Michael Thomas,

0:03:58.880 --> 0:04:02.000
<v Speaker 1>guys like that. So you know, it was it was

0:04:02.040 --> 0:04:04.360
<v Speaker 1>not a surprise to me to see that group. I know,

0:04:04.400 --> 0:04:06.640
<v Speaker 1>everybody who was watching on TV's like, oh there, and

0:04:06.720 --> 0:04:08.520
<v Speaker 1>you know Mayak and those guys making a big deal

0:04:08.560 --> 0:04:10.800
<v Speaker 1>about it. But when you watch the tape of these

0:04:10.800 --> 0:04:14.200
<v Speaker 1>guys that there's not that with the exception of uh,

0:04:14.240 --> 0:04:17.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, listen be and then also with full Fuller,

0:04:17.400 --> 0:04:19.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, these guys really don't run. And I'll tell

0:04:19.560 --> 0:04:22.000
<v Speaker 1>you why. Another receiver who really impressed me is Josh

0:04:22.080 --> 0:04:24.520
<v Speaker 1>Doson there you go. I mean, he we liked him

0:04:24.520 --> 0:04:26.320
<v Speaker 1>on tape and it's not like it was a big surprise,

0:04:26.360 --> 0:04:28.640
<v Speaker 1>but he tested much better than I thought he would.

0:04:28.960 --> 0:04:31.040
<v Speaker 1>Uh you know at six two two two ran four

0:04:31.120 --> 0:04:34.039
<v Speaker 1>or five flat forty one in vertical. Uh, I mean

0:04:34.160 --> 0:04:37.520
<v Speaker 1>he really tested well. So I think Josh Doxson only

0:04:37.560 --> 0:04:40.160
<v Speaker 1>helped himself I mean he's he was already you know,

0:04:40.400 --> 0:04:42.599
<v Speaker 1>probably in that top five conversation in terms of wide

0:04:42.640 --> 0:04:45.120
<v Speaker 1>receivers in his class. I think he only solidified it.

0:04:45.320 --> 0:04:47.360
<v Speaker 1>And you know he has a strong case to go

0:04:47.400 --> 0:04:49.680
<v Speaker 1>in that back half around one. Okay, I was gonna

0:04:49.680 --> 0:04:51.800
<v Speaker 1>ask you this question. Said that back in Indian You

0:04:51.800 --> 0:04:54.880
<v Speaker 1>guys scoffed at me for whatever. Never mean to scoffed

0:04:54.880 --> 0:04:58.039
<v Speaker 1>at you. What about Dodson? We scoffed at you. Oh,

0:04:58.520 --> 0:05:01.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm Fuller. I'm were high on Fuller. Okay, guys are

0:05:01.600 --> 0:05:04.400
<v Speaker 1>high on Fuller. Yeah, no, No, we understand Tyler. We

0:05:04.440 --> 0:05:07.040
<v Speaker 1>expected to run um, you know, in the four threes

0:05:07.080 --> 0:05:08.880
<v Speaker 1>or yea, because that's his game and that's his game.

0:05:09.200 --> 0:05:12.840
<v Speaker 1>And he's interesting because it's you know, he doesn't need

0:05:12.960 --> 0:05:17.039
<v Speaker 1>to be a volume catcher to make an impact on

0:05:17.080 --> 0:05:20.240
<v Speaker 1>a game. I mean, he can have three catches and

0:05:20.400 --> 0:05:23.240
<v Speaker 1>have one hundred and twenty yards and maybe a touchdown

0:05:23.279 --> 0:05:25.440
<v Speaker 1>and you know that's a quality day for him. His

0:05:25.600 --> 0:05:28.480
<v Speaker 1>value in the draft is interesting to try and figure

0:05:28.480 --> 0:05:31.520
<v Speaker 1>out because he isn't going to be a possession guy.

0:05:31.520 --> 0:05:33.880
<v Speaker 1>He's gonna be a big play, home run threat, sure

0:05:33.960 --> 0:05:36.680
<v Speaker 1>type of guy, and you can absolutely use those types.

0:05:37.040 --> 0:05:40.200
<v Speaker 1>But is he uh? Is he that much better than say,

0:05:40.240 --> 0:05:42.320
<v Speaker 1>like a Terrence Williams. Yeah. I was going to ask

0:05:42.360 --> 0:05:46.719
<v Speaker 1>you that question, and David Hellman, you're our Dallas cowboy expert,

0:05:47.080 --> 0:05:50.480
<v Speaker 1>and he's a terrifying comparison. No, but but do you know,

0:05:50.560 --> 0:05:53.400
<v Speaker 1>does this does this offense and we're talking about the

0:05:53.440 --> 0:05:57.520
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys here, does this offense need a guy like a Fuller,

0:05:58.000 --> 0:06:01.240
<v Speaker 1>a guy that can take the top off a defense

0:06:01.279 --> 0:06:04.960
<v Speaker 1>with that ability. Does this team lack speed at the

0:06:05.000 --> 0:06:09.640
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver position? And would you consider Fuller at you know,

0:06:09.760 --> 0:06:13.719
<v Speaker 1>thirty four if he was there? It's an interesting question. Yeah,

0:06:13.760 --> 0:06:16.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean yes, I think this offense does lack speed.

0:06:16.520 --> 0:06:19.559
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you look around. Dez is not Deaz because

0:06:19.600 --> 0:06:22.320
<v Speaker 1>he's a burner, right, Terrence is fast, but he's not

0:06:22.960 --> 0:06:26.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean, he's not Antonio Brown. I know he ran

0:06:26.480 --> 0:06:28.320
<v Speaker 1>a slow forty at the combine. It's ironic that I

0:06:28.360 --> 0:06:30.800
<v Speaker 1>say that, but he's I mean, he's not that guy

0:06:30.800 --> 0:06:34.960
<v Speaker 1>that's going to scare scare the cornerback. And then you

0:06:35.000 --> 0:06:36.760
<v Speaker 1>look around and you don't have that among any of

0:06:36.800 --> 0:06:40.599
<v Speaker 1>your other guys. Certainly not Darren McFadden, Certainly not Cole Beasley.

0:06:40.640 --> 0:06:43.240
<v Speaker 1>Maybe Lucky Whitehead, but we have not seen him utilized

0:06:43.240 --> 0:06:46.920
<v Speaker 1>in that way. And then you factor in the part

0:06:46.960 --> 0:06:51.520
<v Speaker 1>where Terrence Williams is entering a contract year, and you know,

0:06:51.600 --> 0:06:54.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't feel great about signing him to any type

0:06:54.680 --> 0:06:57.760
<v Speaker 1>of big money deal after that. So yeah, I think

0:06:57.760 --> 0:07:01.560
<v Speaker 1>wide receivers in need for this team. Thirty four is

0:07:01.600 --> 0:07:03.120
<v Speaker 1>where you kind of scare me a little bit. I

0:07:03.160 --> 0:07:05.599
<v Speaker 1>just think there's so I scared you, h. I think

0:07:05.600 --> 0:07:08.320
<v Speaker 1>there's needs that are bigger and that. And you know,

0:07:08.760 --> 0:07:10.680
<v Speaker 1>people have been tweeting me for the last week or

0:07:10.680 --> 0:07:13.360
<v Speaker 1>so that I was so high on Laquon Treadwell where

0:07:13.080 --> 0:07:15.400
<v Speaker 1>you were when we started this. For the record, I

0:07:15.480 --> 0:07:18.400
<v Speaker 1>still am. He's still probably my favorite just in terms

0:07:18.440 --> 0:07:21.200
<v Speaker 1>of he's my favorite player in this draft, maybe in

0:07:21.320 --> 0:07:23.320
<v Speaker 1>terms of guys to watch and stuff like that. But

0:07:23.760 --> 0:07:27.040
<v Speaker 1>you look around at what this team needs and and

0:07:27.800 --> 0:07:30.960
<v Speaker 1>what I think they need to solidify going forward. I

0:07:31.000 --> 0:07:33.520
<v Speaker 1>can't convince myself that wide receiver is a big enough

0:07:33.600 --> 0:07:36.400
<v Speaker 1>need at thirty four, let alone four, which is why

0:07:36.400 --> 0:07:40.239
<v Speaker 1>I've kind of cooled on Treadwell. Picture paint a picture

0:07:40.280 --> 0:07:42.560
<v Speaker 1>for will Fuller for the for the fans out there,

0:07:42.880 --> 0:07:47.760
<v Speaker 1>he's so outstanding at finding the ball in flight. He

0:07:47.840 --> 0:07:51.720
<v Speaker 1>has that second burst, that secondary burst down field that

0:07:51.840 --> 0:07:54.280
<v Speaker 1>corners a lot of these corners can't match, and so

0:07:54.320 --> 0:07:58.360
<v Speaker 1>he's able to create that separation down the field. And

0:07:58.560 --> 0:08:01.080
<v Speaker 1>while he is a little more body catcher than you want,

0:08:01.120 --> 0:08:04.520
<v Speaker 1>he his tiny hands, he is sable. He tracks the

0:08:04.560 --> 0:08:08.360
<v Speaker 1>ball really well, and so u he has he has

0:08:08.640 --> 0:08:12.560
<v Speaker 1>terrific value. I think he's probably gonna end up somewhere

0:08:12.560 --> 0:08:14.960
<v Speaker 1>in the top thirty five picks. So I think it

0:08:15.080 --> 0:08:18.200
<v Speaker 1>is possible he's there at thirty. Yes, But and we

0:08:18.200 --> 0:08:21.040
<v Speaker 1>we've talked about it with these wide receivers, and you know,

0:08:21.080 --> 0:08:23.680
<v Speaker 1>the biggest reason not to take a Laquon Treadwell top

0:08:23.880 --> 0:08:27.440
<v Speaker 1>ten is because of these this clump of receivers in

0:08:27.480 --> 0:08:29.360
<v Speaker 1>the second round. You know that Josh, you know you

0:08:29.360 --> 0:08:31.920
<v Speaker 1>could find a Josh Docks and a Will Fuller. Uh,

0:08:32.480 --> 0:08:34.800
<v Speaker 1>there's a host of these guys in the second round

0:08:34.840 --> 0:08:38.160
<v Speaker 1>that can come in and contribute. And not that they're

0:08:38.200 --> 0:08:40.600
<v Speaker 1>better than Lakwan Treadwell. Treadwell is the best in this class,

0:08:40.640 --> 0:08:42.960
<v Speaker 1>but there's not a huge drop off. You can go

0:08:43.040 --> 0:08:46.000
<v Speaker 1>to another position top ten, find your receiver second round.

0:08:46.040 --> 0:08:47.760
<v Speaker 1>That's same thing with defensive tackle. This year, I think

0:08:47.800 --> 0:08:51.199
<v Speaker 1>defensive tackle and wide receiver. That sweet spot is going

0:08:51.280 --> 0:08:53.240
<v Speaker 1>to be, you know, on the twenty five to forty

0:08:53.240 --> 0:08:55.280
<v Speaker 1>five range. That's when you're going to be able to

0:08:55.440 --> 0:08:56.839
<v Speaker 1>you know, find that guy. And that's right where the

0:08:56.880 --> 0:08:59.040
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys are, right in the middle. So I don't you know,

0:08:59.080 --> 0:09:01.800
<v Speaker 1>they don't need to take a wide receiver at four.

0:09:01.840 --> 0:09:03.320
<v Speaker 1>They can get that guy in the second round if

0:09:03.360 --> 0:09:05.600
<v Speaker 1>that's a direction they want to go. I'll go back

0:09:05.600 --> 0:09:08.080
<v Speaker 1>to my earlier point, which is, and you know, you

0:09:08.080 --> 0:09:09.960
<v Speaker 1>can never predict these things. It's the same argument we

0:09:10.000 --> 0:09:14.480
<v Speaker 1>have with quarterbacks every week, every day. Really, if Dez

0:09:14.559 --> 0:09:17.440
<v Speaker 1>Bryant is healthy, Terrence Williams is more than good enough

0:09:17.480 --> 0:09:20.520
<v Speaker 1>to be the number two options on this team. It's

0:09:20.720 --> 0:09:22.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, we found out last year that he's not

0:09:22.559 --> 0:09:25.439
<v Speaker 1>going to be your number one guy. He's not reliable.

0:09:25.520 --> 0:09:28.440
<v Speaker 1>He hasn't been reliable over his entire career. Here, I think,

0:09:28.480 --> 0:09:32.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean statistics back that up. But if you're assuming

0:09:32.640 --> 0:09:34.719
<v Speaker 1>Dez is gonna play thirteen or more games, I think

0:09:34.800 --> 0:09:36.920
<v Speaker 1>Terence is totally fine. And like you said, he's entering

0:09:36.960 --> 0:09:39.280
<v Speaker 1>a contract year, absolutely, so you do have to prepare

0:09:39.360 --> 0:09:42.160
<v Speaker 1>for and you do you do? And that's I'm actually

0:09:42.200 --> 0:09:46.559
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking at the list right now. Go to Dane's boy,

0:09:46.720 --> 0:09:48.880
<v Speaker 1>like I know he loves him. If they wanted to

0:09:48.960 --> 0:09:52.480
<v Speaker 1>draft Pharaoh Cooper sure in the third round or you know,

0:09:52.600 --> 0:09:54.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't think he falls to the force, but maybe

0:09:54.240 --> 0:09:57.320
<v Speaker 1>he does. I'm way more willing to take a shot.

0:09:57.320 --> 0:09:59.560
<v Speaker 1>And I just looked this up to Martavis Bryant, who

0:09:59.640 --> 0:10:02.360
<v Speaker 1>I love of, who has excelled as the guy behind

0:10:02.440 --> 0:10:05.720
<v Speaker 1>Antonio Brown in Pittsburgh. He's pick one eight team sure,

0:10:05.760 --> 0:10:07.920
<v Speaker 1>So I mean, obviously you have to hit on these picks.

0:10:07.960 --> 0:10:09.800
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's not a give. It's not a give.

0:10:09.960 --> 0:10:13.120
<v Speaker 1>That discussion was about the speed, you know what I'm saying.

0:10:13.160 --> 0:10:15.920
<v Speaker 1>That's what I mean. I mean, Terry Williams, you would

0:10:15.920 --> 0:10:17.920
<v Speaker 1>only you would look at you would look at Fuller

0:10:17.960 --> 0:10:20.760
<v Speaker 1>at thirty four because of the speed, because you know,

0:10:21.080 --> 0:10:23.840
<v Speaker 1>as you go through all the players you named or

0:10:24.240 --> 0:10:27.000
<v Speaker 1>and their own writer out or nice players. But I'm

0:10:27.000 --> 0:10:29.400
<v Speaker 1>trying to think of how do you make this team

0:10:29.480 --> 0:10:34.400
<v Speaker 1>better with speed? And it's really that's what just with

0:10:34.400 --> 0:10:37.199
<v Speaker 1>will Fuller, I don't care, I mean don't speed is

0:10:37.240 --> 0:10:39.960
<v Speaker 1>great and Fuller as a burner, I don't care that

0:10:40.040 --> 0:10:43.400
<v Speaker 1>much about just one off nine routes speed like Devin

0:10:43.480 --> 0:10:46.559
<v Speaker 1>Smith last year. Uh it's his name, right, the guy

0:10:46.559 --> 0:10:52.480
<v Speaker 1>that Jeff Uman Smith. I just I just want a

0:10:52.520 --> 0:10:56.679
<v Speaker 1>guy who's consistently when the defense is the bracketing days,

0:10:57.000 --> 0:10:59.120
<v Speaker 1>he has to consistently be able to win. That's all

0:10:59.160 --> 0:11:01.600
<v Speaker 1>I want. I don't care. I mean if he's a burner, right,

0:11:01.720 --> 0:11:04.000
<v Speaker 1>if you don't agree with what we're saying or what

0:11:04.040 --> 0:11:05.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm trying to ask him about the speed. This is

0:11:05.960 --> 0:11:08.600
<v Speaker 1>something Nick Eatman has had, you know, he brings it up.

0:11:08.679 --> 0:11:10.360
<v Speaker 1>He's brought it up every year that I've worked here,

0:11:10.400 --> 0:11:12.640
<v Speaker 1>is that they haven't had that guy who can just

0:11:12.800 --> 0:11:15.040
<v Speaker 1>completely take the top off a defense. But I'm not

0:11:15.080 --> 0:11:17.760
<v Speaker 1>convinced that you need it. I just need a guy

0:11:17.760 --> 0:11:20.120
<v Speaker 1>who can win his one on one matchups when Dez

0:11:20.280 --> 0:11:22.680
<v Speaker 1>is busy, and I think a value of having a

0:11:22.720 --> 0:11:24.760
<v Speaker 1>receiver that can take a top off a defense it

0:11:24.840 --> 0:11:28.559
<v Speaker 1>really stretch out that defense is because it's not most cases,

0:11:28.559 --> 0:11:30.599
<v Speaker 1>it's not going to be one on one coverage. You know,

0:11:30.600 --> 0:11:32.760
<v Speaker 1>all defenses aren't going to just allow the corner to

0:11:32.760 --> 0:11:34.800
<v Speaker 1>play one on one with a threat like Will Fuller.

0:11:34.800 --> 0:11:37.599
<v Speaker 1>They're going to draw a safety towards that side of

0:11:37.640 --> 0:11:40.280
<v Speaker 1>the field and helps. And that's what I'm saying with

0:11:40.320 --> 0:11:43.600
<v Speaker 1>these a legit deep threat. I mean, there's a lot

0:11:43.679 --> 0:11:45.679
<v Speaker 1>of speedy guys, but not all of them are legit

0:11:46.120 --> 0:11:49.439
<v Speaker 1>deep threats like will Fuller. Is right, Adding a player

0:11:49.440 --> 0:11:52.080
<v Speaker 1>like Will Fuller will help stretch out the defense open

0:11:52.160 --> 0:11:54.080
<v Speaker 1>things up, and so I think just that's just a

0:11:54.200 --> 0:11:56.760
<v Speaker 1>threat of him going deep could really help the offense.

0:11:56.840 --> 0:11:59.280
<v Speaker 1>And I don't mean to suggest that I don't like

0:11:59.320 --> 0:12:03.040
<v Speaker 1>will Fuller. I like them, you do, um. I'm just saying,

0:12:03.040 --> 0:12:05.160
<v Speaker 1>and you know, thinking back to twenty fourteen when this

0:12:05.240 --> 0:12:09.760
<v Speaker 1>offense was so successful, the big play is I don't

0:12:09.760 --> 0:12:12.480
<v Speaker 1>really know that they're I mean, obviously big plays are great,

0:12:12.520 --> 0:12:14.560
<v Speaker 1>but I don't really know that that's their blueprint anyway.

0:12:14.559 --> 0:12:16.319
<v Speaker 1>They want to control the ball, they want to control

0:12:16.360 --> 0:12:18.680
<v Speaker 1>the clock. Is Will Fuller top five wide receiver in

0:12:18.720 --> 0:12:22.120
<v Speaker 1>this class for you? Yeah? He is? Okay, he is,

0:12:22.160 --> 0:12:24.360
<v Speaker 1>and I I you know what, and I y'all's rank.

0:12:24.480 --> 0:12:27.880
<v Speaker 1>I know you had Coleman too, Yeah right, yeah, Lakwan

0:12:27.960 --> 0:12:29.840
<v Speaker 1>tried well and Corey colemaner still one two for me,

0:12:29.960 --> 0:12:32.000
<v Speaker 1>and you have docks in two. Yeah, I have docks

0:12:32.160 --> 0:12:34.559
<v Speaker 1>in there. I have Michael Thomas in there too as well,

0:12:34.679 --> 0:12:37.320
<v Speaker 1>and then Lawler and Fuller were my guys. Yeah, that's

0:12:37.640 --> 0:12:39.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I'm right there, Treadwell, Coleman, and I want

0:12:39.880 --> 0:12:43.280
<v Speaker 1>two Josh Dockson is my number three, Thomas, my number

0:12:43.320 --> 0:12:46.000
<v Speaker 1>four Cooper to my number five Fuller numbers. So there's

0:12:46.000 --> 0:12:49.000
<v Speaker 1>people that will probably take docs and over over Michael

0:12:49.000 --> 0:12:53.199
<v Speaker 1>Thomas in Ohio State. Yeah, and it's flavor, you know.

0:12:54.160 --> 0:12:56.319
<v Speaker 1>I think they're closely rated. Yeah, I mean, and that's

0:12:56.360 --> 0:12:58.240
<v Speaker 1>what y'all were talking. I mean, this whole clump right here.

0:12:58.240 --> 0:13:03.320
<v Speaker 1>I speaking of help himself, Sterling Shepard helped himself. Oh yeah,

0:13:03.360 --> 0:13:05.079
<v Speaker 1>and he's helped himself since the end of the season

0:13:05.160 --> 0:13:07.680
<v Speaker 1>at the Senior Bowl which here there and at the combine.

0:13:07.800 --> 0:13:10.440
<v Speaker 1>He's yeah, and he can help you in the slot.

0:13:10.480 --> 0:13:14.040
<v Speaker 1>I think he can play on the outside. Is he

0:13:14.080 --> 0:13:16.760
<v Speaker 1>best in the slot? Probably with a shorter area quickness,

0:13:16.760 --> 0:13:19.400
<v Speaker 1>and I mean, just good luck try a slot or

0:13:19.400 --> 0:13:21.240
<v Speaker 1>a nickel corner trying to cover him in the slot.

0:13:21.280 --> 0:13:22.840
<v Speaker 1>But I think he can also play on the outside,

0:13:22.840 --> 0:13:25.200
<v Speaker 1>which you make of all these the cornerbacks in the workout,

0:13:25.280 --> 0:13:26.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, that's a position a lot of people have

0:13:27.080 --> 0:13:30.200
<v Speaker 1>focused on it. It depends on you know, Hargraves measured

0:13:31.400 --> 0:13:33.920
<v Speaker 1>taller than what we thought thought he was a five

0:13:34.080 --> 0:13:36.480
<v Speaker 1>nine guy. I think he was five ten four. Yeah,

0:13:36.559 --> 0:13:39.280
<v Speaker 1>and does it I mean, does it? Does it change

0:13:39.320 --> 0:13:41.360
<v Speaker 1>you watching the film? Of course, he feel like that

0:13:41.520 --> 0:13:44.520
<v Speaker 1>he plays a little small at times. He does. He

0:13:44.559 --> 0:13:48.120
<v Speaker 1>came in really honestly, size wise and speedwise. He came

0:13:48.160 --> 0:13:50.079
<v Speaker 1>in what I thought I thought right around five ten

0:13:50.120 --> 0:13:52.320
<v Speaker 1>and a half, right around four to five, and he

0:13:52.400 --> 0:13:55.800
<v Speaker 1>was just right around those those times. So William Jackson

0:13:55.840 --> 0:13:57.000
<v Speaker 1>to me, is that that's why I was going to

0:13:57.080 --> 0:14:00.720
<v Speaker 1>go to Yeah, he's he really kind of opened some

0:14:00.800 --> 0:14:02.720
<v Speaker 1>eyes a little bit more. Yeah, And it's not that

0:14:02.800 --> 0:14:05.040
<v Speaker 1>he came out of nowhere. He was viewed as a

0:14:05.080 --> 0:14:08.480
<v Speaker 1>solid second round pick, maybe even an early second round pick,

0:14:08.559 --> 0:14:11.640
<v Speaker 1>especially for the teams that value size at that position.

0:14:12.840 --> 0:14:14.400
<v Speaker 1>But for him to go out and run a four

0:14:14.520 --> 0:14:18.760
<v Speaker 1>three seven is outstanding. Yeah, that long striding speed, he's

0:14:18.840 --> 0:14:21.320
<v Speaker 1>so good at playing the ball with his back to

0:14:21.360 --> 0:14:24.360
<v Speaker 1>the ball. He has that innate ability, which is you

0:14:24.480 --> 0:14:27.560
<v Speaker 1>need that in the NFL to play cornerback. So William

0:14:27.640 --> 0:14:30.800
<v Speaker 1>Jackson definitely helped himself. I think he's has a good chance,

0:14:30.840 --> 0:14:32.920
<v Speaker 1>a good argument to go late first round. Okay here,

0:14:33.160 --> 0:14:34.720
<v Speaker 1>especially when you look at the teams that are picking

0:14:34.720 --> 0:14:38.320
<v Speaker 1>back there that prefer those longer corners seattles, and Green

0:14:38.360 --> 0:14:42.800
<v Speaker 1>Bay's Kansas City Pittsburgh would be a good spot. So

0:14:42.960 --> 0:14:45.000
<v Speaker 1>I think he's gonna end up somewhere in that back

0:14:45.000 --> 0:14:47.480
<v Speaker 1>half of round. A lot of mock drafts have Eli

0:14:47.560 --> 0:14:51.080
<v Speaker 1>Apple from Ohio State going to Pittsburgh. Though, is this

0:14:51.200 --> 0:14:54.480
<v Speaker 1>the well, could we see a flip you're talking about guys,

0:14:54.920 --> 0:14:57.960
<v Speaker 1>maybe that Jackson instead of Apple. I don't, I don't.

0:14:57.960 --> 0:15:00.080
<v Speaker 1>I think Apple helped himself, so I don't think he

0:15:00.160 --> 0:15:02.560
<v Speaker 1>might not be there for the Steelers with that pick.

0:15:02.800 --> 0:15:04.840
<v Speaker 1>So you see him going up, you see him being

0:15:05.240 --> 0:15:07.400
<v Speaker 1>up Apple. So he's only a red shirt sophomore. He's

0:15:07.480 --> 0:15:10.200
<v Speaker 1>so young, he still has so much he has to learn.

0:15:10.320 --> 0:15:13.240
<v Speaker 1>But you just look at the traits and he's a future.

0:15:13.600 --> 0:15:15.880
<v Speaker 1>Teams think he's a future number one corner in this league.

0:15:15.880 --> 0:15:19.360
<v Speaker 1>And so I think there's a good chances he's off

0:15:19.360 --> 0:15:22.000
<v Speaker 1>the board somewhere in the top twenty five picks. I mean,

0:15:22.200 --> 0:15:25.600
<v Speaker 1>the traits are impressive, but i've you know, I haven't

0:15:25.600 --> 0:15:27.200
<v Speaker 1>watched anywhere near as much as y'all. But I have

0:15:27.280 --> 0:15:29.520
<v Speaker 1>watched tape on Eli Apple and I didn't come away

0:15:29.840 --> 0:15:32.560
<v Speaker 1>completely blown away by any means, which the fact that

0:15:32.560 --> 0:15:34.880
<v Speaker 1>he's a red shirt sophomore helps explain that a lot.

0:15:35.800 --> 0:15:38.240
<v Speaker 1>I was gonna say. I would be fascinated to see

0:15:38.280 --> 0:15:40.800
<v Speaker 1>what the narrative was on Jackson. If he had participated

0:15:40.800 --> 0:15:43.120
<v Speaker 1>in the Senior Bowl. He was one of those late scratches,

0:15:44.440 --> 0:15:45.840
<v Speaker 1>you know. If he'd gone out there and had a

0:15:45.880 --> 0:15:48.440
<v Speaker 1>dominant week of practices, maybe we'd be talking about him

0:15:48.480 --> 0:15:51.640
<v Speaker 1>in the mid first round. Six oh one two two

0:15:51.640 --> 0:15:55.680
<v Speaker 1>oh nine four three eight. Who does just read? Oh god,

0:15:55.720 --> 0:15:59.680
<v Speaker 1>if you're reading William Jackson. But six oh one two

0:16:00.840 --> 0:16:05.920
<v Speaker 1>two o nine four three eight was his speed hand

0:16:05.920 --> 0:16:11.400
<v Speaker 1>timed talking about corner? Yeah? Who already talking about Jalen Ramsey.

0:16:12.160 --> 0:16:14.040
<v Speaker 1>I should have guessed. I was gonna say, I was

0:16:14.080 --> 0:16:15.800
<v Speaker 1>thinking he's a safety for me, So I wasn't thinking

0:16:15.800 --> 0:16:17.600
<v Speaker 1>of him. I think a lot of teams. No, I'm

0:16:17.640 --> 0:16:20.320
<v Speaker 1>just safety, Brian, No, he's he's a safety to us,

0:16:20.520 --> 0:16:22.200
<v Speaker 1>A lot of safety in my world. Okay, it's a

0:16:22.240 --> 0:16:24.520
<v Speaker 1>safety in your world. What if these guys here looking

0:16:24.640 --> 0:16:26.040
<v Speaker 1>him as a corner Oh, I think a lot of

0:16:26.080 --> 0:16:27.880
<v Speaker 1>teams are. Yeah, because when you're when you're on that

0:16:28.000 --> 0:16:31.080
<v Speaker 1>size and speed, you know, you can play on the outside. Yeah,

0:16:31.400 --> 0:16:33.720
<v Speaker 1>They're gonna keep you out there. There's more value there.

0:16:33.760 --> 0:16:37.320
<v Speaker 1>So I get it. I understand it. But if the long,

0:16:37.600 --> 0:16:41.240
<v Speaker 1>if the long, rumored, not substantiated release of Brandon Carr

0:16:41.240 --> 0:16:43.520
<v Speaker 1>comes to pass, you might need him to play corner. Yeah.

0:16:43.520 --> 0:16:46.160
<v Speaker 1>So I think I think this team right here is

0:16:46.200 --> 0:16:48.080
<v Speaker 1>looking ahead him at corner. I think there are a

0:16:48.120 --> 0:16:50.120
<v Speaker 1>lot of teams And you just said the words. You

0:16:50.200 --> 0:16:53.240
<v Speaker 1>just said the words Seattle. You know, these teams had

0:16:53.240 --> 0:16:57.400
<v Speaker 1>play that that scheme Seattle, Atlanta. He wants for Seattle.

0:16:57.480 --> 0:17:00.960
<v Speaker 1>So no, but I'm just saying that the teams, you know, Yeah,

0:17:01.000 --> 0:17:04.280
<v Speaker 1>you know San Diegan, san Diego, san Diego, if san Diego,

0:17:04.280 --> 0:17:06.359
<v Speaker 1>it would be interesting to see what san Diego sees

0:17:06.440 --> 0:17:09.399
<v Speaker 1>him ass Yeah, if they you know, because they're in

0:17:09.400 --> 0:17:12.160
<v Speaker 1>a situation with with Wettell being gone, do they seem

0:17:12.200 --> 0:17:15.160
<v Speaker 1>as the safety you could pare them with Verret Well,

0:17:15.160 --> 0:17:19.560
<v Speaker 1>and that's I think San Diego and Dallas are both

0:17:19.600 --> 0:17:23.680
<v Speaker 1>in similar situations where without a doubt they they're probably

0:17:23.680 --> 0:17:28.040
<v Speaker 1>going defense. Yes, could take which is which what helps

0:17:28.080 --> 0:17:30.960
<v Speaker 1>the defense more the pass rush, yeah, or the back

0:17:31.200 --> 0:17:33.639
<v Speaker 1>at the back end and in the secondary. You know

0:17:34.040 --> 0:17:36.080
<v Speaker 1>what's going to help that defense more. And so I

0:17:36.119 --> 0:17:39.480
<v Speaker 1>think that they're both teams that I could see going

0:17:39.520 --> 0:17:42.880
<v Speaker 1>either way. Whether that's a Bosa or a Buckner right

0:17:43.119 --> 0:17:45.159
<v Speaker 1>or a Ramsey and a help in the second or

0:17:45.200 --> 0:17:46.800
<v Speaker 1>you can make a strong case for either. See that's

0:17:46.800 --> 0:17:49.120
<v Speaker 1>why I think their defensive board in San Diego will

0:17:49.119 --> 0:17:51.479
<v Speaker 1>be very similar to what this defensive board is here.

0:17:51.600 --> 0:17:53.639
<v Speaker 1>They're still in a three four right, Yeah they are.

0:17:53.760 --> 0:17:56.560
<v Speaker 1>And that's why I think Buckner probably but they but

0:17:56.560 --> 0:17:59.639
<v Speaker 1>but but Buckner. They mentioned Buckner's he when we had

0:17:59.680 --> 0:18:02.440
<v Speaker 1>a chance, it's to interview him. Four three teams are

0:18:02.440 --> 0:18:05.240
<v Speaker 1>looking at him playing inside. You guys kept the Buckner

0:18:05.280 --> 0:18:07.359
<v Speaker 1>hype alive at the combine. I tried to squash it,

0:18:07.440 --> 0:18:10.440
<v Speaker 1>and you guys know, I no, initially, I I when

0:18:10.480 --> 0:18:12.840
<v Speaker 1>when when mel Kiper put him in the mock draft

0:18:12.880 --> 0:18:15.720
<v Speaker 1>the Dallas and made I had a scout come up

0:18:15.720 --> 0:18:17.960
<v Speaker 1>to me and say, when did we start taking three

0:18:18.040 --> 0:18:20.440
<v Speaker 1>four defensive ins here? Said that on like three draft

0:18:20.480 --> 0:18:22.480
<v Speaker 1>shows in our own now. Yeah, but and that's what

0:18:22.760 --> 0:18:25.120
<v Speaker 1>that's what he does best. You know, and that's so

0:18:25.560 --> 0:18:28.480
<v Speaker 1>I get it. But he can also play I didn't

0:18:28.480 --> 0:18:30.680
<v Speaker 1>you play outside? Yeah? And if in a fourth three

0:18:30.680 --> 0:18:32.920
<v Speaker 1>I can play inside, you can play the one. You

0:18:32.920 --> 0:18:34.119
<v Speaker 1>can do a lot of things for you. I think

0:18:34.160 --> 0:18:37.440
<v Speaker 1>diversatility obviously is a high selling points. Watching Garnett block

0:18:37.520 --> 0:18:39.840
<v Speaker 1>him last night at Stamford a little bit playing a

0:18:39.840 --> 0:18:42.880
<v Speaker 1>good battle. That was a good battle well for Garnett.

0:18:43.119 --> 0:18:46.400
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, I was surprised. Kind of a big thick guy,

0:18:46.480 --> 0:18:50.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, he handled the quickness pretty well. Okay, uh

0:18:50.280 --> 0:18:53.440
<v Speaker 1>any other cornerbacks so that we needed to visit about

0:18:53.440 --> 0:18:57.440
<v Speaker 1>the safeties. Any safeties though, jump out at you. Uh,

0:18:57.480 --> 0:19:01.440
<v Speaker 1>you know. As unfortunate Vaughan Bell couldn't run. His interview

0:19:01.520 --> 0:19:03.720
<v Speaker 1>was very weird. He admitted he was being he was

0:19:03.800 --> 0:19:06.399
<v Speaker 1>lazy a lot of times. Yeah, that was strange. Was strange.

0:19:06.400 --> 0:19:08.000
<v Speaker 1>And then he didn't run because of a hammy. So

0:19:08.040 --> 0:19:10.359
<v Speaker 1>hopefully he's able to run out of House States pro day.

0:19:11.760 --> 0:19:13.879
<v Speaker 1>Miles Killerbrew didn't run as well as a lot of

0:19:13.880 --> 0:19:16.320
<v Speaker 1>people thought. Um, and that was kind of what you know.

0:19:16.359 --> 0:19:19.480
<v Speaker 1>The people that like Momas was another one. Thompson excuse

0:19:19.560 --> 0:19:21.680
<v Speaker 1>me was another one, right, Yeah, he had an illness too,

0:19:21.680 --> 0:19:24.600
<v Speaker 1>so hopefully that explains it. But Miles Killerber, if you

0:19:24.600 --> 0:19:26.840
<v Speaker 1>don't like what you see on tape, then you're kind

0:19:26.840 --> 0:19:28.600
<v Speaker 1>of all just wait till the combine. He's gonna test

0:19:28.600 --> 0:19:31.160
<v Speaker 1>really well. Yeah I thought he would, but he didn't

0:19:31.200 --> 0:19:34.200
<v Speaker 1>test as well as I thought. Um, but he still

0:19:34.200 --> 0:19:39.760
<v Speaker 1>weighed in impressively. TJ. Green from Clemson his safety, the

0:19:39.840 --> 0:19:43.080
<v Speaker 1>other guy, not Jr. On curse. TJ. Greene, former wide receiver,

0:19:43.200 --> 0:19:46.360
<v Speaker 1>moved to safety. He ran in the four threes. That's

0:19:46.400 --> 0:19:49.119
<v Speaker 1>only going to help him for teams looking for a

0:19:49.200 --> 0:19:52.400
<v Speaker 1>developmental safety who I thought was a Day three pick.

0:19:52.520 --> 0:19:55.280
<v Speaker 1>But after that speed, teams are gonna be taking them

0:19:55.400 --> 0:19:56.760
<v Speaker 1>more of a look at him as a top one

0:19:56.840 --> 0:20:00.639
<v Speaker 1>hundred guy. How about Powell from Ohio State six h

0:20:00.720 --> 0:20:04.280
<v Speaker 1>two six two eleven. He ran He ran fourth. If

0:20:04.320 --> 0:20:06.000
<v Speaker 1>you look at the speed, if you split it the

0:20:06.040 --> 0:20:09.239
<v Speaker 1>way I've taught all my life, he is roughly like

0:20:09.240 --> 0:20:11.880
<v Speaker 1>a four four eight type of a guy. Ran better

0:20:11.880 --> 0:20:15.160
<v Speaker 1>than a lot of corners. Um. And we've talked about him.

0:20:15.520 --> 0:20:18.480
<v Speaker 1>His tape is one of the most boring tapes. It's

0:20:18.560 --> 0:20:21.800
<v Speaker 1>terrible to watch. It's just it's there's nothing, there's no action,

0:20:21.880 --> 0:20:25.400
<v Speaker 1>it's just kind of he's there. He's not an enforcer,

0:20:25.600 --> 0:20:29.119
<v Speaker 1>he's not necessarily that rangy guy that plays on both sidelines,

0:20:29.600 --> 0:20:32.800
<v Speaker 1>but he's still a valuable piece of that defense. And

0:20:33.080 --> 0:20:35.600
<v Speaker 1>with these testing numbers that suggests that he might be

0:20:35.680 --> 0:20:39.160
<v Speaker 1>a better pro than college flower. Okay, when we were

0:20:39.160 --> 0:20:41.359
<v Speaker 1>going to take our first break. When we get back,

0:20:41.840 --> 0:20:43.639
<v Speaker 1>we'll do a little twitter on the twenty, but I

0:20:43.680 --> 0:20:46.320
<v Speaker 1>want to real quick get into well, maybe we'll do

0:20:46.320 --> 0:20:47.840
<v Speaker 1>it after twenty the twenty. I want to talk about

0:20:47.840 --> 0:20:50.679
<v Speaker 1>the running back situations. We have some questions about it.

0:20:50.720 --> 0:20:52.960
<v Speaker 1>We can use that. You want to talk about it before,

0:20:53.080 --> 0:20:54.600
<v Speaker 1>I want to talk about it after after the break,

0:20:54.640 --> 0:20:56.399
<v Speaker 1>Well you don't want to know. We're gonnat twitter on

0:20:56.440 --> 0:20:58.719
<v Speaker 1>the twenty and hopefully get some running back questions there

0:20:58.720 --> 0:21:01.240
<v Speaker 1>because I want to get in Some interesting stuff has

0:21:01.240 --> 0:21:04.040
<v Speaker 1>come out Lewis Riddick. We've all kind of talked about

0:21:04.040 --> 0:21:06.360
<v Speaker 1>where Zeke fits in all this. I want to get

0:21:06.400 --> 0:21:08.240
<v Speaker 1>your thoughts on that. So we'll be right back with

0:21:08.280 --> 0:21:10.679
<v Speaker 1>the Draft show from the SWBC Mortgage Studios. In just

0:21:10.720 --> 0:21:15.400
<v Speaker 1>a moment, a Dallas Cowboys Star magazine brings you behind

0:21:15.440 --> 0:21:18.920
<v Speaker 1>the scenes coverage within depth player stories entertaining columns, a

0:21:19.000 --> 0:21:23.000
<v Speaker 1>pullout poster, and of course your Dallas Cowboys Chili. I

0:21:23.480 --> 0:21:26.200
<v Speaker 1>subscribe now and get thirty two issues throughout the year,

0:21:26.240 --> 0:21:29.320
<v Speaker 1>including our season breakdown and the stunning Cheerie Just Swim

0:21:29.400 --> 0:21:32.040
<v Speaker 1>Suit issue. Star is delivered to your door for only

0:21:32.119 --> 0:21:34.760
<v Speaker 1>thirty nine ninety five per year, or go digital for

0:21:34.920 --> 0:21:37.359
<v Speaker 1>just fourteen ninety nine a year through our free Star

0:21:37.520 --> 0:21:40.920
<v Speaker 1>magazine app called one eight seven seven NFC Boys to Day.

0:21:43.400 --> 0:21:47.600
<v Speaker 1>It started with a single connection and the network was born.

0:21:49.560 --> 0:21:52.679
<v Speaker 1>It soon grew from a luxury to a necessity. So

0:21:52.800 --> 0:21:55.320
<v Speaker 1>A T and T built a network just for you,

0:21:55.920 --> 0:22:02.400
<v Speaker 1>one that connects your entertainment, friends and family, devices and homes.

0:22:03.480 --> 0:22:06.480
<v Speaker 1>We grow as you grew, always evolving to work for

0:22:06.600 --> 0:22:09.920
<v Speaker 1>you how and where you need to hear. This is

0:22:10.000 --> 0:22:14.360
<v Speaker 1>your network, the network of AT and T that hits

0:22:14.400 --> 0:22:20.920
<v Speaker 1>the Missus, Pizza, the Juice, the Sacks, Pizza, the superstars,

0:22:20.960 --> 0:22:25.320
<v Speaker 1>the super fans, the pizza, everything you love about football

0:22:25.440 --> 0:22:29.760
<v Speaker 1>this year, especially pizza. Help your game with two large,

0:22:29.760 --> 0:22:32.440
<v Speaker 1>two topping pizzas for only seven dollars and seventy seven

0:22:32.440 --> 0:22:35.280
<v Speaker 1>cents each. That's two large, two topping pizzas for seven

0:22:35.320 --> 0:22:39.840
<v Speaker 1>dollars and seventy seven cents each, Better Ingredients, Better Pizza.

0:22:40.119 --> 0:22:43.400
<v Speaker 1>Papa Johns dot Com, the official tizza sponsor of the NFL.

0:22:43.880 --> 0:22:47.240
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys Nation gear up for a season of new memories

0:22:47.280 --> 0:22:51.720
<v Speaker 1>and game day celebration. Wherever Jogs Jackson darre We're being

0:22:51.760 --> 0:22:54.240
<v Speaker 1>one of the Boys means the girls join in two

0:22:54.320 --> 0:22:58.520
<v Speaker 1>where X marks the spot for every false Sunday where

0:22:58.600 --> 0:23:03.760
<v Speaker 1>number nine has become number one in our playbook. From

0:23:03.760 --> 0:23:07.960
<v Speaker 1>the only store exclusively for Cowboys Nation, the official pro

0:23:08.040 --> 0:23:11.080
<v Speaker 1>shop of the Dallas Cowboys. Like us on Facebook to

0:23:11.119 --> 0:23:16.320
<v Speaker 1>see the latest in Dallas Cowboys gear is the Dallas

0:23:16.320 --> 0:23:20.879
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys dot Com Draft Show. Cowboys Back here in the

0:23:20.960 --> 0:23:25.400
<v Speaker 1>Draft Show from the SWBC Mortgage Studios. Brian Broadest, Dame Burglar,

0:23:25.480 --> 0:23:29.480
<v Speaker 1>David Hellman, Kent Garrison, Executive Producer. Thanks everybody to joining

0:23:29.520 --> 0:23:31.880
<v Speaker 1>us here today. Have you noticed We've got to some

0:23:31.960 --> 0:23:34.520
<v Speaker 1>new camera angles and things like that, working in some

0:23:34.600 --> 0:23:39.080
<v Speaker 1>new graphics and inserts and stuff. I think I'm staying there. Yeah,

0:23:39.119 --> 0:23:41.879
<v Speaker 1>So thanks to everybody that works so hard on that

0:23:41.920 --> 0:23:44.000
<v Speaker 1>to get all that together for you guys, We really

0:23:44.000 --> 0:23:46.560
<v Speaker 1>do appreciate you being out there and supporting the Draft Show.

0:23:47.920 --> 0:23:50.679
<v Speaker 1>Thanks to Ed K. Hill for creating this segment some

0:23:50.880 --> 0:23:53.480
<v Speaker 1>three years ago. It's known as Twitter on the twy

0:23:53.560 --> 0:23:56.680
<v Speaker 1>Twitter on the Twitter with that, Dave Hellman, I will

0:23:56.720 --> 0:23:59.280
<v Speaker 1>turn it over to you, and let's let's begin. All right,

0:23:59.359 --> 0:24:02.080
<v Speaker 1>let's go rap fire. Got it. Michael wants to know

0:24:02.600 --> 0:24:05.040
<v Speaker 1>how does this year's top ten stack up to last

0:24:05.119 --> 0:24:07.280
<v Speaker 1>year's for you? I mean, if if the Cowboys had

0:24:07.320 --> 0:24:10.080
<v Speaker 1>the fourth pick last year, well, Maury Cooper was the

0:24:10.080 --> 0:24:12.199
<v Speaker 1>first or the fourth pick last year? Yeah, I mean

0:24:12.240 --> 0:24:15.160
<v Speaker 1>you look at last year's draft. I think the quarterbacks

0:24:15.160 --> 0:24:18.240
<v Speaker 1>were better with Winston Mariotte at the top. You look

0:24:18.240 --> 0:24:22.160
<v Speaker 1>at the wide receivers with Cooper and White, um, two

0:24:22.200 --> 0:24:24.840
<v Speaker 1>really good talents there, and then you had Girly at

0:24:24.920 --> 0:24:27.760
<v Speaker 1>number ten. So in a lot of ways it's similar.

0:24:27.800 --> 0:24:31.160
<v Speaker 1>You know, you have a Zeke this year and unfortunate

0:24:31.160 --> 0:24:32.720
<v Speaker 1>when you get to see him because of ACL but

0:24:32.840 --> 0:24:36.040
<v Speaker 1>I think he's gonna come back strong. Um, you know,

0:24:36.080 --> 0:24:39.159
<v Speaker 1>I I think there are some comparisons. I think you

0:24:39.200 --> 0:24:41.760
<v Speaker 1>can you see impact guys last year. I think you

0:24:41.760 --> 0:24:45.520
<v Speaker 1>see impact guys this year, not necessarily the generational talents,

0:24:45.560 --> 0:24:49.760
<v Speaker 1>but guys that can potentially make Pro Bowls. Yeah, I agree.

0:24:49.600 --> 0:24:53.199
<v Speaker 1>I think the interesting pick would have been girly if Fouler,

0:24:53.320 --> 0:24:56.240
<v Speaker 1>I know he went to at three, but you know

0:24:56.320 --> 0:24:58.600
<v Speaker 1>there were some guys there, the two quarterbacks of course,

0:24:58.640 --> 0:25:01.360
<v Speaker 1>if one would have the slit Tea and Cooper though

0:25:01.400 --> 0:25:04.680
<v Speaker 1>the wide receiver was outstanding. So yeah, I like a

0:25:05.400 --> 0:25:08.159
<v Speaker 1>I I think I would. I would align more with

0:25:08.200 --> 0:25:12.120
<v Speaker 1>the talent last year than the talent this year. As

0:25:12.119 --> 0:25:14.880
<v Speaker 1>far as having a top five pick, I have this

0:25:15.200 --> 0:25:17.760
<v Speaker 1>weird feeling like this is going to be remembered as

0:25:17.840 --> 0:25:20.040
<v Speaker 1>kind of a weak draft, which is unfortunate for You're

0:25:20.040 --> 0:25:21.639
<v Speaker 1>gonna make it what it is. Well, sure, you know,

0:25:21.720 --> 0:25:23.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, and I hate when I hate when scouts

0:25:23.560 --> 0:25:25.720
<v Speaker 1>say that, because you got to go out and find players.

0:25:26.080 --> 0:25:29.359
<v Speaker 1>They're they're a Pro Bowl player, Absolutely find them. So

0:25:29.600 --> 0:25:32.600
<v Speaker 1>you just do, Bobby, And I've asked you this before, Brian,

0:25:32.640 --> 0:25:34.840
<v Speaker 1>Bobby wants to know where you think. And you know,

0:25:34.960 --> 0:25:38.640
<v Speaker 1>usually you're talking fourteen to twenty first round grades eighteen.

0:25:39.240 --> 0:25:42.359
<v Speaker 1>Where do you think the first here talent stops in

0:25:42.440 --> 0:25:47.639
<v Speaker 1>this draft? Well? I have eighteen first round. That's why

0:25:47.640 --> 0:25:50.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm at right now. So that's you know, you know,

0:25:50.080 --> 0:25:52.240
<v Speaker 1>the people ask me about elite. I never used the

0:25:52.280 --> 0:25:55.120
<v Speaker 1>word like elite. You know, and I mean I try

0:25:55.200 --> 0:25:57.600
<v Speaker 1>to use where I used the word to describe the

0:25:57.640 --> 0:26:01.760
<v Speaker 1>ability that that Greg Hardy, but in a draft I

0:26:01.880 --> 0:26:04.440
<v Speaker 1>try not to so much. But I have eighteen first

0:26:04.520 --> 0:26:06.200
<v Speaker 1>round names, Stain, I don't know how many you have,

0:26:06.359 --> 0:26:09.119
<v Speaker 1>is well. And I just released my second top fifty

0:26:09.119 --> 0:26:12.879
<v Speaker 1>board today and to me, the top five guys are

0:26:13.200 --> 0:26:16.640
<v Speaker 1>my top tier, right, and that's tonsil at one jacket two,

0:26:16.880 --> 0:26:18.400
<v Speaker 1>so you can break it down that way. Yeah, three,

0:26:18.960 --> 0:26:21.480
<v Speaker 1>I have Ramsey Bosos my number four, and then Zeke

0:26:21.560 --> 0:26:23.720
<v Speaker 1>number five. I think those five guys are just a

0:26:23.760 --> 0:26:26.119
<v Speaker 1>little bit better than the rest. And then my second

0:26:26.119 --> 0:26:29.760
<v Speaker 1>tier I've got guys like Treadwell, Buckner, Sheldon Rankins, the

0:26:29.800 --> 0:26:33.520
<v Speaker 1>two quarterbacks, Golf and Wentz, Ronnie Stanley, Darren Lee. I

0:26:33.520 --> 0:26:36.960
<v Speaker 1>think that second tier is more like a dozen guys,

0:26:37.280 --> 0:26:40.239
<v Speaker 1>fifteen guys. But that top tier for me, it just

0:26:40.280 --> 0:26:43.640
<v Speaker 1>does top five. Yeah, that's that's that's fair to say.

0:26:43.640 --> 0:26:46.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean, to me even more recent to stand in

0:26:46.960 --> 0:26:49.800
<v Speaker 1>there and make a pick, right exactly. I just feel like,

0:26:49.800 --> 0:26:51.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, training back, when you get into the second tier,

0:26:52.320 --> 0:26:55.119
<v Speaker 1>you listed a bunch of nice players. Sure, no doubt

0:26:55.359 --> 0:26:58.199
<v Speaker 1>you know, potential starters, potential starters, guys that could have

0:26:58.280 --> 0:27:01.200
<v Speaker 1>really nice careers. But you know, when you start talking

0:27:01.200 --> 0:27:04.600
<v Speaker 1>about Zeke, you start talking about Ramsey and Tonsil and

0:27:04.680 --> 0:27:08.040
<v Speaker 1>guys like that. You know, Bosa. Did you say Bosa

0:27:08.119 --> 0:27:10.840
<v Speaker 1>was one? Yeah? See, So that's for you know, for

0:27:10.920 --> 0:27:13.080
<v Speaker 1>you that it's worth standing in there and making a pick.

0:27:13.080 --> 0:27:15.119
<v Speaker 1>And one thing about trading back. I am not moving

0:27:15.119 --> 0:27:18.000
<v Speaker 1>back unless there's another first round pick involved. And not

0:27:18.400 --> 0:27:21.600
<v Speaker 1>just I mean you're moving back for another first round pick,

0:27:21.600 --> 0:27:23.840
<v Speaker 1>but I'm talking about a future first round pick, especially

0:27:23.840 --> 0:27:25.800
<v Speaker 1>if well, unless I'm moving like three or four spots.

0:27:25.880 --> 0:27:27.520
<v Speaker 1>But say like the Rams, you know, I get that

0:27:27.600 --> 0:27:30.520
<v Speaker 1>question a lot on Twitter moving back to fifteen plus

0:27:30.560 --> 0:27:34.959
<v Speaker 1>their two second rounders. I'm to move back ten plus spots.

0:27:34.960 --> 0:27:36.800
<v Speaker 1>I need at least a future first rounder to do

0:27:36.840 --> 0:27:38.720
<v Speaker 1>that to get out of the top five this year.

0:27:38.800 --> 0:27:41.000
<v Speaker 1>Oh man, that's that's you know what, that's that's an

0:27:41.000 --> 0:27:44.120
<v Speaker 1>interesting thought. I just don't think that you can hold

0:27:44.160 --> 0:27:47.320
<v Speaker 1>somebody up depending on mean, how bad, how bad they're.

0:27:47.359 --> 0:27:50.000
<v Speaker 1>They're honestly overpaying with the two ones. I mean, see

0:27:50.040 --> 0:27:52.119
<v Speaker 1>me with the with the two two. Yeah, But when

0:27:52.119 --> 0:27:54.600
<v Speaker 1>you're in a position like that, you hold sure, you know, Yeah,

0:27:54.600 --> 0:27:56.600
<v Speaker 1>you do. You hold the cards. You're a right and

0:27:56.640 --> 0:27:58.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm not holding my breath that it's going to happen. Right,

0:27:58.640 --> 0:28:00.760
<v Speaker 1>But if that's the only way I'm moving out, I'm

0:28:00.760 --> 0:28:03.359
<v Speaker 1>not gonna Two twos are nice, but give me a

0:28:03.400 --> 0:28:05.480
<v Speaker 1>future first rounder in order to do that? What if?

0:28:05.800 --> 0:28:07.560
<v Speaker 1>So what if I said that they would give you

0:28:07.600 --> 0:28:09.879
<v Speaker 1>one of their seconds and next year's first would you

0:28:09.920 --> 0:28:12.880
<v Speaker 1>take that over two seconds in this year's draft? Oh? Yeah, absolutely,

0:28:13.200 --> 0:28:14.960
<v Speaker 1>especially for a team like the Rams. So I don't

0:28:15.000 --> 0:28:17.080
<v Speaker 1>expect to be a playoff team. That's interesting because that

0:28:17.400 --> 0:28:20.600
<v Speaker 1>you would say, okay, we'll take take well, we'll take

0:28:20.640 --> 0:28:23.959
<v Speaker 1>I mean you're talking about it you I mean, sorry, Rams,

0:28:24.000 --> 0:28:26.680
<v Speaker 1>but maybe first half of the next year's first round,

0:28:26.880 --> 0:28:29.399
<v Speaker 1>first sixteen picks, you know, or first twelve if or

0:28:29.720 --> 0:28:32.000
<v Speaker 1>first twenty if they don't make the playoffs. Yeah. So

0:28:32.080 --> 0:28:36.760
<v Speaker 1>so you're talking about having pick fourteen and then turn

0:28:36.800 --> 0:28:40.720
<v Speaker 1>around in fifteen years give me fifteen, pick fifteen, your

0:28:40.800 --> 0:28:44.720
<v Speaker 1>own thirty four forty three likely, and then next year's one. Yeah,

0:28:44.760 --> 0:28:47.800
<v Speaker 1>which could be high? Do that? Do that a heartbeat? Yeah? Hope?

0:28:48.280 --> 0:28:50.800
<v Speaker 1>Which is there or another impact guy? So you would

0:28:50.800 --> 0:28:53.600
<v Speaker 1>you would? That would be an interesting way of looking

0:28:53.640 --> 0:28:55.440
<v Speaker 1>at it. I think people always think about, give me

0:28:55.480 --> 0:28:57.400
<v Speaker 1>the picks right now, let me do some damage in

0:28:57.400 --> 0:29:01.239
<v Speaker 1>this trap. But this guy has traded back and uh,

0:29:01.560 --> 0:29:03.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, trading and picked up a one from that.

0:29:03.360 --> 0:29:06.920
<v Speaker 1>We've seen desperate teams move up and you know, give

0:29:06.920 --> 0:29:10.240
<v Speaker 1>away picks just because they they want to win right away.

0:29:10.320 --> 0:29:12.400
<v Speaker 1>They need to make an impact. And the Rams they

0:29:12.400 --> 0:29:14.960
<v Speaker 1>want a quarterback and never say I mean yeah more

0:29:15.000 --> 0:29:17.440
<v Speaker 1>so than their guy has to be there to order

0:29:17.440 --> 0:29:19.160
<v Speaker 1>to make that work. They need a quarterback. But let

0:29:19.160 --> 0:29:20.760
<v Speaker 1>me ask you this, So could they sit there with

0:29:20.800 --> 0:29:23.160
<v Speaker 1>what you know right now? You just put two quarterbacks

0:29:23.160 --> 0:29:24.760
<v Speaker 1>in the middle of this draft. That's why not hold

0:29:24.840 --> 0:29:27.520
<v Speaker 1>my breath, you know. But if they get spooked that,

0:29:28.320 --> 0:29:29.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, a team like the Eagles are going to

0:29:30.000 --> 0:29:33.360
<v Speaker 1>move up, possibly into that top seven. The Niners they're

0:29:33.440 --> 0:29:36.480
<v Speaker 1>at seven, possibly taking a quarterback. You know, say Carson

0:29:36.520 --> 0:29:39.840
<v Speaker 1>Wentz comes off the board. Jared Goff is the next

0:29:39.840 --> 0:29:42.560
<v Speaker 1>guy that these teams want. They get spooked about him

0:29:42.600 --> 0:29:45.640
<v Speaker 1>not lasting very long. They look for a trade partner.

0:29:46.000 --> 0:29:47.960
<v Speaker 1>You never know, it could be four. I bet it

0:29:47.960 --> 0:29:50.440
<v Speaker 1>would be the Cowboys that would spook them. Let's say

0:29:50.880 --> 0:29:54.880
<v Speaker 1>wins goes to the Cowboys draft golf at four, then

0:29:54.880 --> 0:29:56.960
<v Speaker 1>you're talking about really only having one of those big

0:29:57.000 --> 0:29:59.520
<v Speaker 1>three talents left and he's got to fall ten more spots.

0:30:00.400 --> 0:30:02.520
<v Speaker 1>But obviously the Cowboys would have their guy has to

0:30:02.560 --> 0:30:04.560
<v Speaker 1>be there. Yeah, and maybe this is a deal that

0:30:04.600 --> 0:30:08.120
<v Speaker 1>you work out beforehand. This is a decent segue from Daniel,

0:30:08.240 --> 0:30:10.520
<v Speaker 1>And it's gonna come down to preference. Really there's no

0:30:10.600 --> 0:30:13.480
<v Speaker 1>universal answer, But is there an order of the top

0:30:13.560 --> 0:30:17.000
<v Speaker 1>three picks that would really make you want to trade back? Like,

0:30:17.200 --> 0:30:19.200
<v Speaker 1>is there a way that you don't have a guy

0:30:19.240 --> 0:30:22.080
<v Speaker 1>there that you want or is that virtually impossible at four?

0:30:23.440 --> 0:30:26.520
<v Speaker 1>Let's I mean, let's paid to scenario where this would

0:30:26.520 --> 0:30:28.920
<v Speaker 1>be a perfect example of like where Tounsil falls to

0:30:29.000 --> 0:30:31.600
<v Speaker 1>four and you really don't want to do that. I don't,

0:30:31.640 --> 0:30:34.200
<v Speaker 1>and I don't think Tonsil will be if Dallas cowboy,

0:30:34.200 --> 0:30:38.200
<v Speaker 1>if he's there at for um, I don't know what

0:30:38.280 --> 0:30:39.719
<v Speaker 1>you think think about this, So I'm trying to think

0:30:39.720 --> 0:30:41.360
<v Speaker 1>of it, because who would tend to see take other

0:30:41.400 --> 0:30:44.520
<v Speaker 1>than Tonsil, Ramsey, Ramsey. I think, say they go tackle

0:30:44.560 --> 0:30:48.600
<v Speaker 1>in free agency, I Ramseys, Okay, Sages Ramsey, and then

0:30:48.600 --> 0:30:51.960
<v Speaker 1>it goes wins and then I think it would have

0:30:52.120 --> 0:30:54.200
<v Speaker 1>to be. The thing is I think now San Diego

0:30:54.280 --> 0:30:56.760
<v Speaker 1>takes I don't know how they wouldn't pass on Tonsil

0:30:57.000 --> 0:30:59.160
<v Speaker 1>unless they have some bad medical stuff or you know, yeah,

0:30:59.240 --> 0:31:01.160
<v Speaker 1>the shoulder, right. I thinkin of that started to be

0:31:01.200 --> 0:31:03.160
<v Speaker 1>talked about a little bit. Bosa would have to go

0:31:03.200 --> 0:31:05.840
<v Speaker 1>in the top three to really force the Cowboys into

0:31:05.840 --> 0:31:08.240
<v Speaker 1>wanting to do something like that. And I don't think

0:31:08.240 --> 0:31:10.880
<v Speaker 1>he will go top three. That's just my Maybe somebody

0:31:10.880 --> 0:31:13.520
<v Speaker 1>want to come up for Tunsil. That might be that

0:31:13.520 --> 0:31:15.680
<v Speaker 1>that might that might be more of an avenue than

0:31:15.720 --> 0:31:17.800
<v Speaker 1>one of these quarterbacks. I think there's a bigger gap

0:31:17.840 --> 0:31:22.080
<v Speaker 1>between Tunsil and Stanley than people There's there's a real

0:31:22.120 --> 0:31:24.440
<v Speaker 1>big gap. I mean people talk about him being similar.

0:31:24.640 --> 0:31:27.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't think Conklin's the second best tackle on this draft.

0:31:27.040 --> 0:31:30.720
<v Speaker 1>There you go, but Baltimore picks six. They could probably

0:31:30.760 --> 0:31:32.920
<v Speaker 1>use the left tackle, right, Yeah, they just let their

0:31:32.960 --> 0:31:35.040
<v Speaker 1>guy go. Well night have Eugene Monroe that they signed,

0:31:35.160 --> 0:31:37.760
<v Speaker 1>but he can't stay healthy. They have to think about,

0:31:37.800 --> 0:31:40.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, the future. Teams always will they always look

0:31:40.600 --> 0:31:43.720
<v Speaker 1>at these offensive tackles that would I could jack Conklin's

0:31:43.720 --> 0:31:45.560
<v Speaker 1>the second best tackle on this draft, that would be

0:31:45.600 --> 0:31:48.360
<v Speaker 1>I love it. Tounsil falling to four would be like, well,

0:31:48.480 --> 0:31:51.120
<v Speaker 1>Leonard Williams falling to five or six whatever he fell

0:31:51.200 --> 0:31:53.840
<v Speaker 1>to last exact, and that's what we talk about. Tunsil's

0:31:53.880 --> 0:31:56.160
<v Speaker 1>not gonna fall. Leonard Williams fell to six last year.

0:31:56.840 --> 0:31:58.680
<v Speaker 1>I thought, by far, or easily, the best player in

0:31:58.680 --> 0:32:00.880
<v Speaker 1>the draft last year. Yeah, it just you know, sometimes

0:32:00.880 --> 0:32:03.240
<v Speaker 1>that happens. And you look at the Redskins picking number

0:32:03.240 --> 0:32:05.680
<v Speaker 1>five last year, they were I think they made their

0:32:05.680 --> 0:32:08.840
<v Speaker 1>minds up. They were taking Brandon Shuff. Yeah, so Leonard

0:32:08.880 --> 0:32:10.600
<v Speaker 1>Williams fell to them, but they were like, you know what,

0:32:10.960 --> 0:32:14.160
<v Speaker 1>we were taking the offensive lineman. That's who we've been

0:32:14.160 --> 0:32:17.440
<v Speaker 1>planning on taking guard. I have it on good authority

0:32:17.480 --> 0:32:19.280
<v Speaker 1>that that pick would have been Lyle Collins in a

0:32:19.280 --> 0:32:23.320
<v Speaker 1>different universe, m if in fact, if in fact he

0:32:23.360 --> 0:32:27.680
<v Speaker 1>hadn't had any red flags. Yeah, isn't that fascinating? It is? Anyway,

0:32:28.080 --> 0:32:31.160
<v Speaker 1>um Andre has a real draft nerd question for y'all.

0:32:31.520 --> 0:32:34.040
<v Speaker 1>He wants to know if Malik Collins is a one

0:32:34.160 --> 0:32:38.080
<v Speaker 1>or three tech, and he's a three penetrating three, that's

0:32:38.120 --> 0:32:41.080
<v Speaker 1>his best. He's He's got a wrestling background, very quick

0:32:41.120 --> 0:32:43.480
<v Speaker 1>off the ball. I love the way you could attack gaps,

0:32:43.480 --> 0:32:46.280
<v Speaker 1>getting and get into the backfield and do some damage.

0:32:46.520 --> 0:32:48.640
<v Speaker 1>He's got him picked. He's he's a three tech project

0:32:48.680 --> 0:32:51.160
<v Speaker 1>him for me a third rounder. I got him in

0:32:51.200 --> 0:32:54.000
<v Speaker 1>the third. Yeah, I think that's Uh, these defensive tackle

0:32:54.040 --> 0:32:58.080
<v Speaker 1>class once that initial you know the fifteen, the fifty,

0:32:58.240 --> 0:32:59.920
<v Speaker 1>you know all those defense tackles are gonna come off

0:32:59.960 --> 0:33:02.360
<v Speaker 1>the board. Then you have that that next tier where

0:33:02.480 --> 0:33:05.080
<v Speaker 1>in the third round guys like Malik Jackson or MILIEK

0:33:05.160 --> 0:33:10.600
<v Speaker 1>Collins and uh Hashan Hassan Ridgeway, these these Washington some

0:33:10.680 --> 0:33:14.080
<v Speaker 1>good Constellation prizes. If you don't get that defensive tackle early,

0:33:14.360 --> 0:33:17.960
<v Speaker 1>there's some still some good defensive talent. Uh, that's gonna

0:33:17.960 --> 0:33:20.120
<v Speaker 1>be in the third round quickly. Did can DJ hurt

0:33:20.200 --> 0:33:25.440
<v Speaker 1>himself or help himself? Yeah? That hurt bizarre like people

0:33:25.720 --> 0:33:27.800
<v Speaker 1>I gotta I was looking at him at thirty four.

0:33:28.040 --> 0:33:29.960
<v Speaker 1>I got a question about that. We talked about it

0:33:30.000 --> 0:33:32.880
<v Speaker 1>at the combine. I I'm starting to think that's not

0:33:32.920 --> 0:33:35.880
<v Speaker 1>even like far fetched, Like I think he'll I think

0:33:35.880 --> 0:33:37.960
<v Speaker 1>he'll be there, He'll be in that range. I have

0:33:38.000 --> 0:33:40.000
<v Speaker 1>him going to Denver right now at thirty one. That's

0:33:40.120 --> 0:33:42.200
<v Speaker 1>right there. So yeah, I think he's gonna be right

0:33:42.240 --> 0:33:45.720
<v Speaker 1>there in that conversations. The interview process is really what's

0:33:46.040 --> 0:33:47.800
<v Speaker 1>what it's all about for him. I mean, it just

0:33:47.840 --> 0:33:50.920
<v Speaker 1>seems so strange the way that all he rows people

0:33:50.960 --> 0:33:53.280
<v Speaker 1>the wrong way. He's got the off field stuff, the

0:33:53.320 --> 0:33:56.200
<v Speaker 1>way he I mean, the whole hell he threw tons. Yeah,

0:33:56.280 --> 0:33:58.160
<v Speaker 1>so that whole thing. Teams already knew that. It's not

0:33:58.200 --> 0:34:00.920
<v Speaker 1>like he outed tonsl to teams. Teams knew what was

0:34:00.960 --> 0:34:02.840
<v Speaker 1>going on in that room. So that's not a big thing.

0:34:02.880 --> 0:34:04.600
<v Speaker 1>But just that he would be so open about that

0:34:04.640 --> 0:34:08.399
<v Speaker 1>information to the media. You're just you're not thinking, is no?

0:34:08.600 --> 0:34:11.399
<v Speaker 1>And that's that's exactly he's not thinking. So what else

0:34:11.520 --> 0:34:14.279
<v Speaker 1>when you give him money, millions of dollars and he's

0:34:14.320 --> 0:34:17.759
<v Speaker 1>going to be out away from the facility, is he

0:34:17.800 --> 0:34:20.319
<v Speaker 1>going to be thinking? Can you trust him? And at

0:34:20.320 --> 0:34:23.759
<v Speaker 1>some point, just like Randy Gregory, he's worth it. You know,

0:34:23.880 --> 0:34:25.680
<v Speaker 1>he's worth the risk. You know you're going to roll

0:34:25.680 --> 0:34:29.080
<v Speaker 1>the dice on these guys. For Kimdici, where is that

0:34:29.239 --> 0:34:31.480
<v Speaker 1>point where he's worth it? Is it thirty four? Is

0:34:31.520 --> 0:34:34.719
<v Speaker 1>it maybe further than that? Like Gregory was, It's a

0:34:34.760 --> 0:34:37.680
<v Speaker 1>fascinating case. He's a three technique though it sounds like

0:34:37.719 --> 0:34:39.880
<v Speaker 1>to me that this team has invested a lot of

0:34:39.880 --> 0:34:42.239
<v Speaker 1>money and a guy playing three technique give me one.

0:34:43.360 --> 0:34:45.520
<v Speaker 1>I hate to say this because we get so much

0:34:45.560 --> 0:34:49.480
<v Speaker 1>Baylor talk around here, but give me Billings. That's Billings

0:34:49.520 --> 0:34:51.640
<v Speaker 1>would be very interesting here. I feel I think that

0:34:51.640 --> 0:34:54.480
<v Speaker 1>would be phenomenal. He would you would rather somebody other

0:34:54.520 --> 0:34:57.080
<v Speaker 1>than Billings, wouldn't you know? I like Billings? But I

0:34:57.080 --> 0:34:59.320
<v Speaker 1>do think, yeah, there are better defensive tackles in this class.

0:34:59.320 --> 0:35:02.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I have, uh what billions of my number

0:35:02.040 --> 0:35:04.960
<v Speaker 1>five defensive tackle? Okay, Sheldon Rankins to me, is the

0:35:05.000 --> 0:35:07.759
<v Speaker 1>top guy? Give me? Is he your number one? Is

0:35:07.800 --> 0:35:10.399
<v Speaker 1>he your first? One technique? No? I like him better

0:35:10.440 --> 0:35:12.680
<v Speaker 1>than three? Oh no, no, no, no, no, I'm talking

0:35:12.680 --> 0:35:16.399
<v Speaker 1>about Billings. Billings Now, I like drawn read the top

0:35:16.440 --> 0:35:18.839
<v Speaker 1>one technique. So if read, if Reid was, if if

0:35:18.840 --> 0:35:20.919
<v Speaker 1>it came down to read or Billings at thirty four,

0:35:21.000 --> 0:35:23.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm taking read. It's taking read, and then I think

0:35:23.080 --> 0:35:26.880
<v Speaker 1>there's an interesting conversation between Vernon Butler and Andrew Billings.

0:35:27.360 --> 0:35:29.879
<v Speaker 1>But who you would like better? There? I think? I mean,

0:35:29.880 --> 0:35:32.239
<v Speaker 1>I do like Vernon Butler, Dan Turner will tell you

0:35:32.280 --> 0:35:34.680
<v Speaker 1>he's a big butler fan. I said Billings just the head.

0:35:34.680 --> 0:35:37.200
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, I said this last year, and I'm gonna

0:35:37.239 --> 0:35:40.839
<v Speaker 1>say it like it's it's just dumb if they don't

0:35:40.840 --> 0:35:42.880
<v Speaker 1>come out of these first four or so picks without

0:35:42.880 --> 0:35:45.560
<v Speaker 1>a defensive tackle to add well, especially what you've seen

0:35:45.640 --> 0:35:48.600
<v Speaker 1>with Nick had Neighbor. It was a bridge one year.

0:35:48.680 --> 0:35:51.040
<v Speaker 1>Now it's been a two year. I like Nick Haden

0:35:51.080 --> 0:35:52.719
<v Speaker 1>and I don't care. I don't mind if they bring

0:35:52.800 --> 0:35:55.359
<v Speaker 1>him back. But like, this draft is deep. You can

0:35:55.440 --> 0:35:58.160
<v Speaker 1>probably get a pretty damn good tackle at sixty seven,

0:35:58.280 --> 0:36:00.640
<v Speaker 1>let alone third. No, I don't disagree with you, but

0:36:00.920 --> 0:36:04.399
<v Speaker 1>I don't trust that they're gonna be One more question, okay, Dan,

0:36:05.120 --> 0:36:07.520
<v Speaker 1>Dan says, and this is gonna be something that free

0:36:07.520 --> 0:36:09.759
<v Speaker 1>agency is gonna is gonna have a say in. But

0:36:10.080 --> 0:36:14.319
<v Speaker 1>Dallas needs a tight end. Okay, I don't think that's surprising. No,

0:36:14.800 --> 0:36:18.280
<v Speaker 1>he wants to know about Vanette or just in general,

0:36:18.360 --> 0:36:21.520
<v Speaker 1>your thoughts at where and who this team could look

0:36:21.520 --> 0:36:26.520
<v Speaker 1>at tight end? Very ordinary tight end class. It's very blah.

0:36:26.560 --> 0:36:29.239
<v Speaker 1>It's hard to get too excited about these guys. But

0:36:29.800 --> 0:36:31.880
<v Speaker 1>with that said, there is talent um, you know, I

0:36:31.880 --> 0:36:33.440
<v Speaker 1>don't We're not gonna have a first round tight end

0:36:33.480 --> 0:36:36.279
<v Speaker 1>this year. I don't believe Hunter Henry get to the

0:36:36.280 --> 0:36:38.799
<v Speaker 1>first round. I just I can't see it. But Nick

0:36:38.880 --> 0:36:42.520
<v Speaker 1>Vanette in the third round, fourth round? What about? What

0:36:42.520 --> 0:36:45.480
<v Speaker 1>about your guy Higbee? I like him, I just I

0:36:45.480 --> 0:36:47.520
<v Speaker 1>think the medicals are going to kill him. I think

0:36:47.600 --> 0:36:49.840
<v Speaker 1>he's he's a big athletic kid who can catch the

0:36:49.880 --> 0:36:53.040
<v Speaker 1>ball and stretch a scene. But I don't think he did.

0:36:53.040 --> 0:36:55.560
<v Speaker 1>The medicals were. What's the scary thing there? The Hooper

0:36:55.640 --> 0:36:58.680
<v Speaker 1>kid ran really really well from Stanford. He did. He

0:36:58.800 --> 0:37:01.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of a vanilla players tell I tested a lot

0:37:01.040 --> 0:37:03.040
<v Speaker 1>better than his tape. Sure you know on tape he

0:37:03.080 --> 0:37:05.560
<v Speaker 1>doesn't doesn't value at all. He's solid. I mean he's

0:37:05.760 --> 0:37:08.399
<v Speaker 1>a fourth round guy to me. Yeah, I like the

0:37:08.480 --> 0:37:11.560
<v Speaker 1>Iowa player Krieger Kobel right this year. And then if

0:37:11.600 --> 0:37:14.040
<v Speaker 1>you're looking for a blocker, you know he's not going

0:37:14.080 --> 0:37:16.160
<v Speaker 1>to give you as much in the in the passing game,

0:37:16.200 --> 0:37:18.959
<v Speaker 1>but as a blocker, he's someone that brings value. David

0:37:19.000 --> 0:37:22.200
<v Speaker 1>Morgan at US Texas and Antonio right in the later rounds.

0:37:22.520 --> 0:37:24.120
<v Speaker 1>I think that would make a lot of sense. Yeah,

0:37:24.160 --> 0:37:27.919
<v Speaker 1>it's what's interesting about these to me about these tight ends,

0:37:27.920 --> 0:37:30.840
<v Speaker 1>and you said, there's if you look at and I'm

0:37:30.920 --> 0:37:33.640
<v Speaker 1>not one of the big the metrics guy, I'm not

0:37:33.680 --> 0:37:35.640
<v Speaker 1>really big. I'm trying to learn about that because I'm

0:37:35.680 --> 0:37:38.160
<v Speaker 1>fascinating because a lot of people ask questions, but they

0:37:38.160 --> 0:37:40.880
<v Speaker 1>will tell you the earlier in the draft you drafted

0:37:40.920 --> 0:37:44.640
<v Speaker 1>tight end, the better chance you have for success. Even

0:37:44.640 --> 0:37:46.759
<v Speaker 1>though here the Cowboys don't tell that to the Cowboys, right,

0:37:46.760 --> 0:37:49.279
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys took one at two, but it first rounds,

0:37:49.360 --> 0:37:53.239
<v Speaker 1>second round tight ends tend to have more success or

0:37:53.560 --> 0:37:56.479
<v Speaker 1>more hit factor as opposed to if you get them

0:37:56.800 --> 0:37:59.520
<v Speaker 1>in the later rounds, like when they drafted Jeff Swain.

0:37:59.760 --> 0:38:03.359
<v Speaker 1>That that that they say that the metrics people tell you, hey,

0:38:03.400 --> 0:38:05.720
<v Speaker 1>if you're gonna go for tight end, go early better

0:38:05.760 --> 0:38:08.239
<v Speaker 1>than late. So that's the kind of the dynamic that

0:38:08.239 --> 0:38:12.640
<v Speaker 1>they're into. Okay, we're gonna take our final break, and

0:38:12.719 --> 0:38:14.920
<v Speaker 1>when we get back, I want to get into the

0:38:15.000 --> 0:38:18.759
<v Speaker 1>running back question about Zeke and the possibility of the

0:38:18.840 --> 0:38:21.520
<v Speaker 1>Dallas Cowboys taking him or anybody else for that matter.

0:38:21.560 --> 0:38:23.680
<v Speaker 1>So you're listening to the Draft show, stay tuned. We'll

0:38:23.680 --> 0:38:28.480
<v Speaker 1>be right back at Dallas Cowboys. Star Magazine brings you

0:38:28.520 --> 0:38:32.200
<v Speaker 1>behind the scenes coverage, within depth, player stories, entertaining columns,

0:38:32.200 --> 0:38:35.839
<v Speaker 1>a pull out poster, and of course you're Dallas Cowboys Chili.

0:38:36.280 --> 0:38:39.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't subscribe now and get thirty two issues throughout

0:38:39.160 --> 0:38:42.280
<v Speaker 1>the year, including our season breakdown and the stunning Cheerie

0:38:42.280 --> 0:38:44.920
<v Speaker 1>There swimming suit issue. Star is delivered to your door

0:38:45.000 --> 0:38:47.480
<v Speaker 1>for only thirty nine ninety five per year, or go

0:38:47.600 --> 0:38:50.200
<v Speaker 1>digital for just fourteen ninety nine a year through our

0:38:50.200 --> 0:38:53.439
<v Speaker 1>free Star magazine app called one eight seven seven. NFC

0:38:53.600 --> 0:39:03.880
<v Speaker 1>Boys Today Hits, the misses, the sacks, the pizza, the superstars,

0:39:03.920 --> 0:39:08.320
<v Speaker 1>the super fans, the pizza. Everything you love about football

0:39:08.520 --> 0:39:12.719
<v Speaker 1>is here, especially the pizza. Help your game with two large,

0:39:12.760 --> 0:39:15.359
<v Speaker 1>two topping pizzas for only seven dollars and seventy seven

0:39:15.440 --> 0:39:18.280
<v Speaker 1>cents each. That's two large, two topping pizzas for seven

0:39:18.280 --> 0:39:22.840
<v Speaker 1>dollars and seventy seven cents each. Better ingredients, better pizza.

0:39:23.120 --> 0:39:26.360
<v Speaker 1>Papa Jahns dot com the official pizza sponsor of the NFL.

0:39:27.080 --> 0:39:31.279
<v Speaker 1>It started with a single connection and the network was born.

0:39:33.239 --> 0:39:36.400
<v Speaker 1>It soon grew from a luxury to a necessity. So

0:39:36.520 --> 0:39:40.320
<v Speaker 1>ATNT build a network just for you, one that connects

0:39:40.360 --> 0:39:47.680
<v Speaker 1>your entertainment friends, and family devices and homes. We grow

0:39:47.840 --> 0:39:51.080
<v Speaker 1>as you grew, always evolving to work for you, how

0:39:51.400 --> 0:39:55.320
<v Speaker 1>and where you needed. This is your network, the network

0:39:55.360 --> 0:39:59.400
<v Speaker 1>of AT and T. Star Sports Tours is the only

0:39:59.440 --> 0:40:03.080
<v Speaker 1>official fan travel partner of the Dallas Cowboys, offering exclusive

0:40:03.160 --> 0:40:07.080
<v Speaker 1>game weekend travel packages with sideline access and photo ops

0:40:07.080 --> 0:40:10.759
<v Speaker 1>with current players, Cowboy legends, cheerleaders and me. Brian brought

0:40:10.840 --> 0:40:13.000
<v Speaker 1>us want to stay at the team hotel? With Star

0:40:13.120 --> 0:40:17.600
<v Speaker 1>Sports Tours, you can and our outstanding ticket selection is unmatched.

0:40:17.719 --> 0:40:19.919
<v Speaker 1>You can trust the official travel partner of the Dallas

0:40:19.960 --> 0:40:22.840
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys and with us, you'll travel like a pro. Visit

0:40:22.880 --> 0:40:29.040
<v Speaker 1>Starsports Tours dot Com to book your travel packages. Today

0:40:28.440 --> 0:40:31.920
<v Speaker 1>is the Dallas Cowboys dot Com Draft Show. Cowboys on

0:40:32.200 --> 0:40:35.600
<v Speaker 1>the Club. We're back here with the Draft Show from

0:40:35.600 --> 0:40:39.240
<v Speaker 1>the SWBC Morgan Studios. Brian brought us Dame Burglar, David Hellman,

0:40:39.880 --> 0:40:44.040
<v Speaker 1>Ken Garrison, Executive Producer. Want to get into a lot

0:40:44.080 --> 0:40:49.560
<v Speaker 1>of talk this week about the possibility of teams looking

0:40:49.600 --> 0:40:55.719
<v Speaker 1>at looking at Ezekiel Elliott and especially this football team.

0:40:55.760 --> 0:40:59.920
<v Speaker 1>Lewis Riddick came out and put the coal to the

0:41:00.080 --> 0:41:03.080
<v Speaker 1>fire a little bit about the possibilities a little bit right, Yeah,

0:41:03.160 --> 0:41:06.960
<v Speaker 1>and Lewis is a you know, former personnel guys talking

0:41:06.960 --> 0:41:09.480
<v Speaker 1>about Eagles. He's lived this, uh you know, he's had

0:41:09.520 --> 0:41:12.520
<v Speaker 1>his ups and down since we've all had in this league.

0:41:12.520 --> 0:41:16.560
<v Speaker 1>But an interesting thought about when people sit down and

0:41:16.600 --> 0:41:19.000
<v Speaker 1>watch the tape of Ezekiel Elliott and talk to him

0:41:19.040 --> 0:41:22.640
<v Speaker 1>and and why he should be considered a top five

0:41:22.680 --> 0:41:26.160
<v Speaker 1>player on a lot of people's sports, but also consideration

0:41:26.560 --> 0:41:28.560
<v Speaker 1>to be select in the top five, And I wanted

0:41:28.600 --> 0:41:31.200
<v Speaker 1>to know your guy's thoughts on that. I think, I mean,

0:41:31.280 --> 0:41:32.920
<v Speaker 1>it's not like this is breaking, is we you know,

0:41:32.960 --> 0:41:35.239
<v Speaker 1>we've been talking about Zeke right since we started how

0:41:35.360 --> 0:41:37.759
<v Speaker 1>how specially is and what I think it is is

0:41:38.680 --> 0:41:40.920
<v Speaker 1>a lot of these top ten guys, top twelve to

0:41:40.960 --> 0:41:44.719
<v Speaker 1>fifteen guys. As teams dive in more and more and

0:41:44.800 --> 0:41:48.160
<v Speaker 1>coaches get involved, they're starting to see more warts and

0:41:48.200 --> 0:41:51.239
<v Speaker 1>so it's not that Zeke is necessarily rising as it is.

0:41:51.480 --> 0:41:55.279
<v Speaker 1>You know, teams are becoming more comfortable drafting running back

0:41:55.280 --> 0:41:57.200
<v Speaker 1>that high because he is such a safe pick in

0:41:57.320 --> 0:42:01.200
<v Speaker 1>terms of the talent. I mean, his weaknesses they're you're nitpicking.

0:42:01.480 --> 0:42:04.719
<v Speaker 1>I mean, he just doesn't have those glaring weaknesses, those

0:42:04.760 --> 0:42:08.160
<v Speaker 1>negatives to his game that would preclude you. Besides the

0:42:08.200 --> 0:42:10.720
<v Speaker 1>fact that he just plays running back, and this factor

0:42:10.760 --> 0:42:13.200
<v Speaker 1>in this isn't a great running back class, factor in

0:42:13.640 --> 0:42:16.760
<v Speaker 1>that this top ten doesn't have the you know, generational talents.

0:42:16.760 --> 0:42:19.319
<v Speaker 1>There's some good talent in his top ten, but not

0:42:19.440 --> 0:42:22.200
<v Speaker 1>the elite guys. And it's easy to see why a

0:42:22.239 --> 0:42:25.360
<v Speaker 1>team the top ten is going to consider Zeke Elliott

0:42:25.360 --> 0:42:28.360
<v Speaker 1>and I do think he goes somewhere top twelve. I

0:42:28.400 --> 0:42:30.160
<v Speaker 1>don't know where it's. I think it's gonna be like

0:42:30.239 --> 0:42:32.440
<v Speaker 1>last year with the Rams, a team that you know,

0:42:32.960 --> 0:42:34.799
<v Speaker 1>the Rams never came up last year and we talked

0:42:34.800 --> 0:42:37.400
<v Speaker 1>about Todd Gurley, you know, And I think it's going

0:42:37.480 --> 0:42:39.440
<v Speaker 1>to be like that this year. Zeke's going to go

0:42:39.520 --> 0:42:42.359
<v Speaker 1>to a team that maybe doesn't have that glaring hole

0:42:42.400 --> 0:42:44.359
<v Speaker 1>at running back, but at some point he's just too

0:42:44.400 --> 0:42:47.440
<v Speaker 1>good to pass up. You Okay with the say having

0:42:48.160 --> 0:42:51.319
<v Speaker 1>Zeke for five years and then moving on to another guy,

0:42:51.520 --> 0:42:53.680
<v Speaker 1>you know that at that premium of a pick. When

0:42:53.719 --> 0:42:57.040
<v Speaker 1>we started this, I you know, I love you well,

0:42:57.320 --> 0:42:59.440
<v Speaker 1>I loved I loved Zeke from the beginning. He's right

0:42:59.480 --> 0:43:01.520
<v Speaker 1>up there with Well. I mean, I'm biased toward the

0:43:01.520 --> 0:43:06.160
<v Speaker 1>explosive offensive playmakers. But you know, I used to you know,

0:43:06.360 --> 0:43:09.319
<v Speaker 1>trade back to nine, ten, eleven and then take him

0:43:09.320 --> 0:43:12.839
<v Speaker 1>because that sounds more appealing. And now again, for the

0:43:12.840 --> 0:43:15.480
<v Speaker 1>most part, I'm not blown away by the guys at

0:43:15.480 --> 0:43:18.560
<v Speaker 1>the top of this draft. I mean, in general terms,

0:43:20.480 --> 0:43:23.000
<v Speaker 1>I think you look at it. Yeah, I mean I

0:43:23.080 --> 0:43:25.160
<v Speaker 1>just looked this up. Amari Cooper was the fourth pick

0:43:25.239 --> 0:43:27.440
<v Speaker 1>last year. He's on a four year deal worth twenty

0:43:27.440 --> 0:43:30.400
<v Speaker 1>two million. So you're talking about paying Zeke five point

0:43:30.400 --> 0:43:32.840
<v Speaker 1>five mill, which is more than you probably want to

0:43:32.840 --> 0:43:34.839
<v Speaker 1>pay a running back, But isn't that much in the

0:43:34.840 --> 0:43:37.360
<v Speaker 1>grand scheme of things. You got him under team control

0:43:37.440 --> 0:43:40.400
<v Speaker 1>for five years. And yeah, Stephen Jones talked about this

0:43:40.440 --> 0:43:42.080
<v Speaker 1>at the combine too. When you're picking this high in

0:43:42.080 --> 0:43:45.160
<v Speaker 1>the draft, you want to eight to ten year cornerstone

0:43:45.200 --> 0:43:48.040
<v Speaker 1>type of player. Running back is a little different, which

0:43:48.080 --> 0:43:51.280
<v Speaker 1>he even said, but like, who cares. If you've got

0:43:51.320 --> 0:43:56.360
<v Speaker 1>Ezekiel Elliott for five years guaranteeing you, you know, barring

0:43:56.400 --> 0:44:00.200
<v Speaker 1>no injuries or freak circumstances, pro Bowl type production the

0:44:00.239 --> 0:44:04.000
<v Speaker 1>next five years, why isn't that worth a top five pick? Well,

0:44:04.080 --> 0:44:06.560
<v Speaker 1>I think we both, all three of us agree He's

0:44:06.600 --> 0:44:08.600
<v Speaker 1>one of the top five players in this draft, no doubt.

0:44:09.200 --> 0:44:12.440
<v Speaker 1>But the better question right now is does would this

0:44:12.480 --> 0:44:15.480
<v Speaker 1>team take him at four? And I mean, knowing what

0:44:15.560 --> 0:44:18.279
<v Speaker 1>they how they viewed the running back position, how it's

0:44:18.320 --> 0:44:20.919
<v Speaker 1>gone the past few years, all the picks and money

0:44:20.960 --> 0:44:23.680
<v Speaker 1>they've invested in the offensive line, would they take a

0:44:23.800 --> 0:44:26.480
<v Speaker 1>running back at four. I have my doubts that they would.

0:44:26.560 --> 0:44:29.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't really believe that they would even need to

0:44:29.200 --> 0:44:31.320
<v Speaker 1>be able to run the football. I mean, that's true,

0:44:31.880 --> 0:44:34.880
<v Speaker 1>but you know, you talk about Darren McFadden proving what

0:44:34.960 --> 0:44:38.239
<v Speaker 1>this line is capable of. You talk about the Dixons

0:44:38.360 --> 0:44:41.239
<v Speaker 1>and Henry's of the world. Who are there for you

0:44:41.280 --> 0:44:44.120
<v Speaker 1>in the second and third round? I'm forgetting somebody who's

0:44:44.120 --> 0:44:46.759
<v Speaker 1>pretty damn good booker on Collins, and there's there's a

0:44:46.800 --> 0:44:48.640
<v Speaker 1>lot of these, you know. And then I mean there's

0:44:48.640 --> 0:44:50.600
<v Speaker 1>the free age. There's a free agent market too. I mean,

0:44:50.840 --> 0:44:55.439
<v Speaker 1>seven days from now, who's a question who knows will

0:44:55.480 --> 0:44:58.640
<v Speaker 1>be on this team? It's a question. The names always

0:44:58.640 --> 0:45:00.640
<v Speaker 1>gets thrown out there like a littlemar Miller. I mean,

0:45:00.680 --> 0:45:02.759
<v Speaker 1>you just said the numbers of what you're gonna pay.

0:45:02.920 --> 0:45:05.840
<v Speaker 1>The reason the reason that Lamar Miller gets thrown around

0:45:05.840 --> 0:45:09.399
<v Speaker 1>a lot. It's because he's young, he's got relatively low

0:45:09.480 --> 0:45:13.160
<v Speaker 1>mileage on him. Um, but you're still you'd have to

0:45:13.160 --> 0:45:16.960
<v Speaker 1>give him more than what you're giving Zeke. Sure, he's

0:45:17.640 --> 0:45:20.879
<v Speaker 1>three to four years older than Zeke. He's got he's

0:45:20.920 --> 0:45:26.040
<v Speaker 1>got four years worth of NFL mileage on him. And overall,

0:45:26.080 --> 0:45:28.759
<v Speaker 1>I don't I mean, you would would see better. You

0:45:28.800 --> 0:45:31.040
<v Speaker 1>sound like to me that you would enter that scenario.

0:45:31.080 --> 0:45:34.239
<v Speaker 1>You would rather go for a young always. I would

0:45:34.239 --> 0:45:36.680
<v Speaker 1>always rather have the young guy. And even I mean

0:45:36.719 --> 0:45:40.799
<v Speaker 1>even at a top five pick, that contract isn't going

0:45:40.880 --> 0:45:43.640
<v Speaker 1>to come back to bite you in the way that

0:45:43.719 --> 0:45:47.960
<v Speaker 1>a big free agent contract could. He scares you the least,

0:45:47.960 --> 0:45:51.560
<v Speaker 1>doesn't he? Right of the guys. You know, my favorite

0:45:51.560 --> 0:45:54.200
<v Speaker 1>player in this draft is well documented. It's Miles Jack.

0:45:54.520 --> 0:45:58.400
<v Speaker 1>But now I'm sweating a March fifteenth workout in Westwood, right,

0:45:58.800 --> 0:46:02.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, my, my, my, my, my whole being, and

0:46:02.360 --> 0:46:05.239
<v Speaker 1>I could be sweating. You know, I want him, whether

0:46:05.280 --> 0:46:07.000
<v Speaker 1>it's here or somewhere else. I want him to go

0:46:07.120 --> 0:46:10.719
<v Speaker 1>and play and have a great career. But it's come

0:46:10.760 --> 0:46:13.760
<v Speaker 1>down to, like, you know, there's there's hit that questions

0:46:13.800 --> 0:46:18.000
<v Speaker 1>about him there's questions about with Joey Bosa, you know,

0:46:18.080 --> 0:46:20.200
<v Speaker 1>the off the field stuff. Let's not act like that.

0:46:20.560 --> 0:46:24.399
<v Speaker 1>Joey Bosa, Noah Spence weren't like hanging out together and

0:46:24.880 --> 0:46:27.839
<v Speaker 1>doing things together and you know all those things. There's

0:46:27.880 --> 0:46:29.680
<v Speaker 1>there's some things that people are going to have to

0:46:29.719 --> 0:46:33.880
<v Speaker 1>dig in on Joey Bosa. There's the position flexibility question

0:46:34.239 --> 0:46:37.160
<v Speaker 1>of Ramsey. Where do you play him? Where where is

0:46:37.160 --> 0:46:38.919
<v Speaker 1>he If you play him at one, well you could

0:46:38.920 --> 0:46:41.040
<v Speaker 1>probably say, well, if he's not very good, we'll move

0:46:41.120 --> 0:46:42.719
<v Speaker 1>him to the other one. Well, that's what I was

0:46:42.920 --> 0:46:44.840
<v Speaker 1>saying about. You know, there's a lot of talent in

0:46:44.840 --> 0:46:47.880
<v Speaker 1>this class, but in terms of questions that you have

0:46:47.920 --> 0:46:50.359
<v Speaker 1>about him, Zeke is the one that you just you're

0:46:50.400 --> 0:46:52.680
<v Speaker 1>not worried about. You're not. I mean the biggest concern

0:46:52.719 --> 0:46:54.319
<v Speaker 1>you have is what he said after the Michigan State

0:46:54.320 --> 0:46:56.279
<v Speaker 1>game about calling out his coaches in the play which

0:46:56.760 --> 0:46:59.200
<v Speaker 1>we watched the tape. He was right, Has anybody disagree

0:46:59.239 --> 0:47:02.360
<v Speaker 1>with what? And he he was an immature moment. I

0:47:02.400 --> 0:47:05.480
<v Speaker 1>mean he's known as the team guy. Yeah, exactly, He's

0:47:05.480 --> 0:47:07.480
<v Speaker 1>known as the ultimate team Just watches blocking and tell

0:47:07.520 --> 0:47:09.080
<v Speaker 1>me that he's not a team guy. I mean just

0:47:09.600 --> 0:47:12.239
<v Speaker 1>that's who he is and so one immature moment is

0:47:12.239 --> 0:47:13.880
<v Speaker 1>not going to define him. It reminds me of the

0:47:13.960 --> 0:47:16.280
<v Speaker 1>quarterback debate, which I mean I've been you know, nobody

0:47:16.360 --> 0:47:18.880
<v Speaker 1>really feels one hundred percent sure about any of these quarterbacks.

0:47:18.920 --> 0:47:21.399
<v Speaker 1>Are you're going to take a quarterback that you have

0:47:21.560 --> 0:47:24.719
<v Speaker 1>seventy five percent confidence in at four over a guy

0:47:24.760 --> 0:47:27.839
<v Speaker 1>that you have ninety percent confidence in? And I mean

0:47:27.880 --> 0:47:31.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm sitting yeah, would ideally want to take a running

0:47:31.800 --> 0:47:35.680
<v Speaker 1>back at four? Not really? But if I feel ninety

0:47:35.680 --> 0:47:38.360
<v Speaker 1>five percent sure that Zeke is going to be a beast,

0:47:38.719 --> 0:47:41.759
<v Speaker 1>and I don't feel that good about anybody else, why

0:47:41.800 --> 0:47:44.280
<v Speaker 1>the hell not? You know, well, that brings up another

0:47:44.400 --> 0:47:47.240
<v Speaker 1>discussion about you know, like with Joey Bosa, people talking

0:47:47.239 --> 0:47:50.520
<v Speaker 1>about how he's already near a ceiling. Since when did

0:47:50.520 --> 0:47:52.360
<v Speaker 1>that become a negative? You know, if you have a

0:47:52.360 --> 0:47:54.880
<v Speaker 1>better idea of what you're getting with the Joey Bosa,

0:47:54.960 --> 0:47:58.200
<v Speaker 1>that's appealing to me because I don't have as much projection,

0:47:58.640 --> 0:48:01.360
<v Speaker 1>it's a little it's less ready board. Yeah, exactly. He

0:48:01.360 --> 0:48:03.080
<v Speaker 1>can come in right now and help my team, and

0:48:03.160 --> 0:48:06.600
<v Speaker 1>I know what I'm getting where with another pass Rusher. Maybe, Um,

0:48:06.800 --> 0:48:08.759
<v Speaker 1>it's more of a projection. Could he be better down

0:48:08.800 --> 0:48:10.880
<v Speaker 1>the road, Yeah, but it's more of a projection, So

0:48:10.960 --> 0:48:13.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that for a fact. So with guys

0:48:13.520 --> 0:48:15.960
<v Speaker 1>like Zeke and Bosa, who are ready to come in

0:48:16.000 --> 0:48:17.799
<v Speaker 1>from day one, I have a great idea who they're

0:48:17.800 --> 0:48:21.080
<v Speaker 1>going to be as pros. That's very appealing. So there's

0:48:21.120 --> 0:48:26.120
<v Speaker 1>no defensive player that you would take Elliott over that's

0:48:26.120 --> 0:48:29.160
<v Speaker 1>currently on this board, right, I mean in that for

0:48:29.280 --> 0:48:31.480
<v Speaker 1>number four, Well, you know, I'm gonna stick to my

0:48:31.560 --> 0:48:35.239
<v Speaker 1>top fifty, my top five tonsils number one, Jack was

0:48:35.360 --> 0:48:38.359
<v Speaker 1>number two, right Ramsey three, right, Bosa four, and then

0:48:38.400 --> 0:48:41.560
<v Speaker 1>Zeke five. Okay, so you're you're locked into three defensive guys.

0:48:41.840 --> 0:48:43.640
<v Speaker 1>I think those three aren't assimilar. If any one of

0:48:43.680 --> 0:48:45.359
<v Speaker 1>those guys were on the board for you at four,

0:48:45.480 --> 0:48:48.840
<v Speaker 1>you would take them over taken. Yes, how about the

0:48:48.920 --> 0:48:53.560
<v Speaker 1>names he just gave you behind? I mean, if they

0:48:53.600 --> 0:48:56.200
<v Speaker 1>take Joey Bosa, I'm fine with it. If they take

0:48:56.280 --> 0:48:58.839
<v Speaker 1>Jalen Ramsey, I'm better than fine. I mean, that's great.

0:48:58.880 --> 0:49:01.480
<v Speaker 1>He's a versatile guy. I mean, I think he could

0:49:01.560 --> 0:49:04.000
<v Speaker 1>be a solid player at either position. But I'm sitting

0:49:04.040 --> 0:49:07.120
<v Speaker 1>here thinking and I know the draft is about five

0:49:07.200 --> 0:49:09.480
<v Speaker 1>years in the future, it's not so much about twenty sixteen.

0:49:10.040 --> 0:49:15.000
<v Speaker 1>But assuming nothing crazy happens, if the Cowboys drafted his

0:49:15.040 --> 0:49:18.000
<v Speaker 1>Ekil Elliott, I'd feel comfortable putting money on him being

0:49:18.080 --> 0:49:20.719
<v Speaker 1>offensive rookie of the year. Yeah. I mean, and he's

0:49:20.719 --> 0:49:23.200
<v Speaker 1>gonna help you control the clock. He's a threat to

0:49:23.320 --> 0:49:25.840
<v Speaker 1>run for a thousand yards. He's gonna help there. And

0:49:25.920 --> 0:49:29.560
<v Speaker 1>McFadden stay healthy, he can block block, Yeah, all this

0:49:29.680 --> 0:49:32.840
<v Speaker 1>good stuff. And you know, we saw what DeMarco Murray

0:49:32.880 --> 0:49:35.279
<v Speaker 1>did for this offense in twenty fourteen in terms of

0:49:35.320 --> 0:49:39.359
<v Speaker 1>ball control, clock control. That's the way Jason Garrett wants

0:49:39.400 --> 0:49:42.359
<v Speaker 1>to play. Then I look over, I thought Byron Jones

0:49:42.400 --> 0:49:46.880
<v Speaker 1>had a great rookie year. What really really tangible impact

0:49:46.880 --> 0:49:50.080
<v Speaker 1>did he make? Though? True? And I mean, is it

0:49:50.080 --> 0:49:53.279
<v Speaker 1>fair to expect more from Jalen Ramsey? Is it fair

0:49:53.320 --> 0:49:55.919
<v Speaker 1>to expect more from Joey Bosa than what you got

0:49:55.960 --> 0:49:59.480
<v Speaker 1>from DeMarcus Lawrence, which is no regular season sacks or

0:49:59.560 --> 0:50:03.560
<v Speaker 1>Randy Gregory for that matter, regular season sacks. I mean,

0:50:03.680 --> 0:50:05.279
<v Speaker 1>somebody did the math on this. I'm not going to

0:50:05.360 --> 0:50:07.919
<v Speaker 1>take credit for it, but somebody out on Twitter came

0:50:07.960 --> 0:50:10.960
<v Speaker 1>up with the fantastic stat that average rookie sack production

0:50:11.000 --> 0:50:14.640
<v Speaker 1>in the NFL is two and a half or three. Yeah. Yeah,

0:50:14.680 --> 0:50:18.799
<v Speaker 1>so that was you're telling me that I could have

0:50:20.080 --> 0:50:24.480
<v Speaker 1>eleven twelve hundred rushing yards and rookie Pro Bowl candidate

0:50:24.520 --> 0:50:28.000
<v Speaker 1>if if verse that, and I know, I mean, Moosa

0:50:28.080 --> 0:50:31.120
<v Speaker 1>becomes what but McFadden gives you ele one hundred rushing

0:50:31.120 --> 0:50:33.759
<v Speaker 1>hards It doesn't issue. Yeah he does. But but I mean,

0:50:33.800 --> 0:50:36.680
<v Speaker 1>if I mean, anybody listening to this podcast is probably

0:50:36.719 --> 0:50:40.239
<v Speaker 1>well aware of McFadden's deficiencies, which you saw last year.

0:50:40.280 --> 0:50:43.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Ezekiel Elliot it made it healthwise, he made

0:50:43.960 --> 0:50:46.319
<v Speaker 1>it through he did which was an upset. Can you

0:50:46.320 --> 0:50:48.440
<v Speaker 1>count on that? Can you count on that? Again? You

0:50:48.480 --> 0:50:51.320
<v Speaker 1>can't how many r I would say McFadden probably have

0:50:51.400 --> 0:50:54.480
<v Speaker 1>four or five runs that were touchdowns. If he's got

0:50:54.520 --> 0:51:00.640
<v Speaker 1>Ezekiel Elliott's legs and speed, that's fascinating because yards, I believe,

0:51:00.640 --> 0:51:02.839
<v Speaker 1>as much as they've invested in this offensive line, yeah,

0:51:02.880 --> 0:51:05.080
<v Speaker 1>they don't need to invest a top five resource into

0:51:05.080 --> 0:51:07.960
<v Speaker 1>a running back, but Zeke is just so appealing. If

0:51:08.000 --> 0:51:10.640
<v Speaker 1>they did, though, and I and all of this stuff

0:51:10.680 --> 0:51:12.600
<v Speaker 1>I just said, I don't really believe at the end

0:51:12.600 --> 0:51:14.080
<v Speaker 1>of the day that they would take him at four,

0:51:14.600 --> 0:51:17.000
<v Speaker 1>but it certainly is interesting to think about. And what

0:51:17.080 --> 0:51:18.879
<v Speaker 1>if what if you took what if he took Zeke

0:51:18.960 --> 0:51:22.279
<v Speaker 1>at at four and you turn around and draft and

0:51:22.360 --> 0:51:27.319
<v Speaker 1>drafted Prescott in the third? Now, how and and that's

0:51:27.360 --> 0:51:29.560
<v Speaker 1>the and that and now you're talking about you got

0:51:29.560 --> 0:51:33.279
<v Speaker 1>a runner, a receiver, and a young offensive line. How

0:51:33.320 --> 0:51:37.560
<v Speaker 1>does that help Dak Prescott transition into being the future

0:51:37.640 --> 0:51:40.879
<v Speaker 1>quarterback of the Dallas Cowboys or Cardel Jones? Okay, well

0:51:40.960 --> 0:51:44.200
<v Speaker 1>I kidding, I know, yea, but how does that? Let's go,

0:51:44.480 --> 0:51:47.280
<v Speaker 1>let's do it. Yes, better, hope the defense stops somebody,

0:51:47.960 --> 0:51:50.240
<v Speaker 1>because that's the way if you're adding these offensive players,

0:51:50.280 --> 0:51:52.480
<v Speaker 1>that's great. But better I mean, that's I mean, And

0:51:52.480 --> 0:51:54.520
<v Speaker 1>that's let me ask you this though, Would you feel

0:51:54.560 --> 0:51:57.560
<v Speaker 1>better about Would you feel better about draft and Zeke

0:51:57.800 --> 0:52:00.759
<v Speaker 1>if Randy Gregory did get three sacks and didn't have

0:52:00.840 --> 0:52:04.680
<v Speaker 1>this suspension hanging over his head? Yeah, for sure that

0:52:04.800 --> 0:52:08.440
<v Speaker 1>you might not lean towards taken Bosa. You know that

0:52:08.560 --> 0:52:10.680
<v Speaker 1>you might you say, well, you know what, we feel

0:52:10.719 --> 0:52:13.680
<v Speaker 1>good about what's going on over here. If you're drafting Bosa.

0:52:13.760 --> 0:52:15.920
<v Speaker 1>I hope it's not because of a knee jerk reaction

0:52:15.960 --> 0:52:19.200
<v Speaker 1>to Randy Gregor anyway. I mean, there's there's more to

0:52:19.400 --> 0:52:21.200
<v Speaker 1>their need on the defensive line than just the fact

0:52:21.239 --> 0:52:24.759
<v Speaker 1>that Randy Gregory's a slappy and the no the no

0:52:24.880 --> 0:52:27.000
<v Speaker 1>sacks thing doesn't worry, but it's more the I just

0:52:27.040 --> 0:52:28.760
<v Speaker 1>don't know if we can trust him off the field.

0:52:28.840 --> 0:52:30.839
<v Speaker 1>I mean, this is he's gonna miss the first four

0:52:30.880 --> 0:52:32.640
<v Speaker 1>games and then what happens, and it's kind of like

0:52:32.640 --> 0:52:36.319
<v Speaker 1>a job might play twelve games and then he's he's

0:52:36.320 --> 0:52:38.520
<v Speaker 1>got a problem. Yeah, you know, you just can't. You

0:52:38.560 --> 0:52:40.200
<v Speaker 1>just don't know. It's so easy for these guys to

0:52:40.239 --> 0:52:42.319
<v Speaker 1>slip up. It's hard to trust them. Okay, I look

0:52:42.320 --> 0:52:45.359
<v Speaker 1>forward to revisiting this when free agency has settled a

0:52:45.360 --> 0:52:50.000
<v Speaker 1>little bit. I'd say there's gonna be there's gonna be

0:52:50.000 --> 0:52:52.040
<v Speaker 1>three or four guys that are not currently in the

0:52:52.080 --> 0:52:54.120
<v Speaker 1>conversation that will be members of this team in the

0:52:54.160 --> 0:52:58.440
<v Speaker 1>next two weeks, and then another you know, Lance dunbar Um,

0:52:58.520 --> 0:53:01.719
<v Speaker 1>James Hannah, Jack Crawford. Maybe these guys are not in

0:53:01.760 --> 0:53:04.040
<v Speaker 1>the conversation anymore, maybe they're somewhere else in the league.

0:53:04.080 --> 0:53:06.160
<v Speaker 1>So Okay, I don't know. It's it's gonna be interesting

0:53:06.160 --> 0:53:10.760
<v Speaker 1>to talk. I'm on board because I'm with you guys.

0:53:11.160 --> 0:53:14.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm on with the production. I'm on with the fact

0:53:14.160 --> 0:53:18.000
<v Speaker 1>that minimize my risk. But give me, give me that

0:53:18.040 --> 0:53:20.560
<v Speaker 1>guy that I think could be a difference maker. I

0:53:20.600 --> 0:53:23.120
<v Speaker 1>think and I wasn't even old enough to really and

0:53:23.160 --> 0:53:25.560
<v Speaker 1>truly remember this, which is gonna make a lot of

0:53:25.560 --> 0:53:29.800
<v Speaker 1>people upset. But I mean, I think about how easily

0:53:29.840 --> 0:53:32.480
<v Speaker 1>successful Emmett Smith was when he first came into the league,

0:53:32.480 --> 0:53:35.319
<v Speaker 1>and how I mean it was almost effortless because of

0:53:35.320 --> 0:53:39.239
<v Speaker 1>the pieces that were in place around offensive blind quarterback.

0:53:39.520 --> 0:53:42.400
<v Speaker 1>Who's like fever, Who's going to be happier about Ezekiel

0:53:42.400 --> 0:53:44.799
<v Speaker 1>Elliott being in his backfield than Tony Romo for these

0:53:44.880 --> 0:53:47.080
<v Speaker 1>last two to four years of his career depending on

0:53:47.160 --> 0:53:49.279
<v Speaker 1>two to four. I like a straight whatever it is

0:53:49.320 --> 0:53:51.960
<v Speaker 1>that he actually winds up playing one game to four years. Jerry,

0:53:52.360 --> 0:53:55.279
<v Speaker 1>Jerry thinks he'll be here for six more years. You

0:53:55.320 --> 0:53:58.520
<v Speaker 1>think he'll be here for two. Somebody thinks he's going

0:53:58.600 --> 0:54:00.600
<v Speaker 1>to have break his neck on the snap of the

0:54:00.600 --> 0:54:02.880
<v Speaker 1>next seas going to take a day by day Thanks coach,

0:54:03.000 --> 0:54:06.399
<v Speaker 1>appreciate it. All right, Well that's a good discussion. All right, Hey, Ken,

0:54:06.400 --> 0:54:08.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna turn the program over you because I'm looking

0:54:08.200 --> 0:54:09.839
<v Speaker 1>and we have about five minutes left in the show

0:54:10.280 --> 0:54:12.319
<v Speaker 1>and I want to get some callers in. So if

0:54:12.320 --> 0:54:14.920
<v Speaker 1>you got it lined up again the numbers eight eight

0:54:15.000 --> 0:54:17.839
<v Speaker 1>eight eight five five two two ninety seven. Again, we're

0:54:17.840 --> 0:54:20.840
<v Speaker 1>all doing well. Get your question right, your question. I

0:54:20.840 --> 0:54:22.360
<v Speaker 1>want to get us to as many calls as I

0:54:22.400 --> 0:54:24.560
<v Speaker 1>can and give everybody an opportunity to chime in. So

0:54:24.840 --> 0:54:27.160
<v Speaker 1>can't you gotta go ahead? Yeah, Bradley and DC go ahead.

0:54:27.719 --> 0:54:32.360
<v Speaker 1>Hey guys, thanks again. So this may be being nitpicky,

0:54:32.440 --> 0:54:36.040
<v Speaker 1>but as far as the quarterback conversation goes with wins

0:54:36.239 --> 0:54:40.840
<v Speaker 1>and Golf, I think that Wentz may be overdrafted because

0:54:40.880 --> 0:54:44.080
<v Speaker 1>he does have the measurables. But looking at Golf, I

0:54:44.120 --> 0:54:46.080
<v Speaker 1>think he has a better feel for the game. And

0:54:46.160 --> 0:54:48.520
<v Speaker 1>when I say still, I like the way he climbs

0:54:48.560 --> 0:54:51.360
<v Speaker 1>the pocket better. And what I noticed with Wentz is

0:54:51.400 --> 0:54:54.800
<v Speaker 1>whenever pressure comes, he seems to kind of run out

0:54:54.920 --> 0:54:57.479
<v Speaker 1>or kind of get he gets flustered when pressure comes.

0:54:57.480 --> 0:54:59.239
<v Speaker 1>And I like the way that Wentz moves in a

0:55:00.000 --> 0:55:03.080
<v Speaker 1>elevator in a smart area. I mean of golf moves

0:55:03.120 --> 0:55:04.800
<v Speaker 1>in a smart area. So if y'all get to speak

0:55:04.800 --> 0:55:07.359
<v Speaker 1>on that, that'd be great. And Brian, thanks, plea's taking

0:55:07.400 --> 0:55:10.480
<v Speaker 1>my questions on what squitter. I appreciate it, no problem, man,

0:55:10.520 --> 0:55:14.839
<v Speaker 1>thanks for getting back at me on that's pretty accurate snapshot. Yeah,

0:55:15.440 --> 0:55:17.719
<v Speaker 1>he's doing his work right, I mean, that's there are

0:55:17.800 --> 0:55:20.480
<v Speaker 1>times definitely we watch Wentz on tape, he feels the ghosts,

0:55:21.040 --> 0:55:23.320
<v Speaker 1>he hears the noise, and he prematurely gets out of

0:55:23.320 --> 0:55:25.680
<v Speaker 1>the pocket, uses his legs. So he knows he's athletic

0:55:25.680 --> 0:55:27.600
<v Speaker 1>and he can move around, and so he takes advantage

0:55:27.640 --> 0:55:29.279
<v Speaker 1>of that. But a lot of times you'd love to

0:55:29.320 --> 0:55:31.560
<v Speaker 1>see him stick in the pocket. Maybe go be a

0:55:31.600 --> 0:55:33.440
<v Speaker 1>little quicker going from one to two to three in

0:55:33.520 --> 0:55:36.879
<v Speaker 1>his reads, where golf is already at an advanced level

0:55:37.040 --> 0:55:40.279
<v Speaker 1>in terms of seeing the field at natural feel for

0:55:40.320 --> 0:55:43.399
<v Speaker 1>his progressions and he feels pressure a lot better. So

0:55:44.840 --> 0:55:48.000
<v Speaker 1>it makes it tough because whence absolutely he wins in

0:55:48.040 --> 0:55:50.799
<v Speaker 1>the measurable department. I mean, you take the decal off

0:55:50.800 --> 0:55:53.400
<v Speaker 1>the helmet and Wentz is everything you want in a

0:55:53.480 --> 0:55:55.640
<v Speaker 1>quarterback in terms of just the way he looks and

0:55:55.800 --> 0:55:58.640
<v Speaker 1>the ball comes off his hand. But is golf just

0:55:58.920 --> 0:56:01.120
<v Speaker 1>a little bit better and turn of the mental process

0:56:01.440 --> 0:56:03.279
<v Speaker 1>and the way he uses his feet, and will that

0:56:03.480 --> 0:56:05.759
<v Speaker 1>be able to make him an overall better quarterback in

0:56:05.760 --> 0:56:08.239
<v Speaker 1>the NFL? Golf takes a beating and you could watch.

0:56:08.280 --> 0:56:09.880
<v Speaker 1>We watched him on tape the other night. We were

0:56:09.880 --> 0:56:13.480
<v Speaker 1>watching the cow U. Yeah, they're running back and all

0:56:13.480 --> 0:56:15.520
<v Speaker 1>of a sudden, he's throwing the ball. He's standing there

0:56:15.560 --> 0:56:18.160
<v Speaker 1>and he's ripping it down the middle and he's taking

0:56:18.160 --> 0:56:20.640
<v Speaker 1>a guy's hitting him in the chest, left tackle, right tackle.

0:56:20.680 --> 0:56:24.240
<v Speaker 1>They're all bad. So yeah, he's he offensive. No favorite

0:56:24.280 --> 0:56:26.440
<v Speaker 1>wins is coming from a program that won a national

0:56:26.440 --> 0:56:30.200
<v Speaker 1>title in five straight seasons, and golf was the quarterback

0:56:30.200 --> 0:56:32.400
<v Speaker 1>of a one and eleven team. Would they go like

0:56:32.440 --> 0:56:35.640
<v Speaker 1>eight and five this year? That it was a huge jump,

0:56:35.680 --> 0:56:40.280
<v Speaker 1>all right, Kim, Yeah, Sam and san Antonio Sam, Hey, guys,

0:56:40.600 --> 0:56:43.600
<v Speaker 1>I first want to say, um, as far as a

0:56:43.640 --> 0:56:46.040
<v Speaker 1>lost feelings about Joey Boss, I'm definitely afraid that the

0:56:46.120 --> 0:56:48.600
<v Speaker 1>Cowboy's gonna pick him. I do not want of him.

0:56:48.600 --> 0:56:51.719
<v Speaker 1>I would take I would even take learning punsel if

0:56:51.719 --> 0:56:54.160
<v Speaker 1>he was there. I mean, I know he's raided very

0:56:54.239 --> 0:56:56.440
<v Speaker 1>highly in that amount of New Povision for US. I

0:56:56.480 --> 0:56:59.719
<v Speaker 1>would take uh heck, I would take running back out

0:56:59.719 --> 0:57:03.000
<v Speaker 1>at home Ohio State. I do not want Joey Bosa.

0:57:03.080 --> 0:57:07.319
<v Speaker 1>I think he's gonna be reready solid and nothing more.

0:57:07.400 --> 0:57:10.120
<v Speaker 1>And at that at that position, I want to see

0:57:09.880 --> 0:57:14.239
<v Speaker 1>somebody who's catalytic, who was special, and I mean to me,

0:57:14.400 --> 0:57:17.720
<v Speaker 1>he had what he had several first and second round

0:57:17.760 --> 0:57:20.680
<v Speaker 1>talent guys along that front seven and I don't think

0:57:20.720 --> 0:57:23.240
<v Speaker 1>that he's gonna be able to go and be you know,

0:57:23.400 --> 0:57:26.120
<v Speaker 1>a let's say DeMarcus Ware type or whatever. But he's

0:57:26.120 --> 0:57:28.800
<v Speaker 1>just he's just not. I do not want Joey Bosa

0:57:28.920 --> 0:57:31.280
<v Speaker 1>at all at number four. I wouldn't even want him

0:57:31.280 --> 0:57:33.720
<v Speaker 1>at fourteen. I'm being honest with you, but honestly, I

0:57:33.720 --> 0:57:36.640
<v Speaker 1>will love I'm in love with Jay Ramley, Miles jack

0:57:36.840 --> 0:57:39.600
<v Speaker 1>But if I was wondering what you guys thought about it, um,

0:57:39.720 --> 0:57:43.320
<v Speaker 1>I'd love to see Chicaboys get Ramsey at four, assuming

0:57:43.320 --> 0:57:45.520
<v Speaker 1>he was even making there, and then go back in

0:57:45.560 --> 0:57:48.640
<v Speaker 1>the second round and try to get William Jackson and

0:57:48.720 --> 0:57:52.120
<v Speaker 1>double down and really turn that that position into all

0:57:52.200 --> 0:57:54.040
<v Speaker 1>strength and they want to get your starts. Y'all have

0:57:54.040 --> 0:57:57.680
<v Speaker 1>a great day, fellas. Right, thanks. I appreciate that. I

0:57:57.760 --> 0:58:00.720
<v Speaker 1>feel like I'm guilty of killing Bosa. It's all your fault.

0:58:00.720 --> 0:58:03.240
<v Speaker 1>I was gonna I mean, I feel like and I

0:58:03.720 --> 0:58:05.480
<v Speaker 1>didn't mean to kill I just it was my opinion.

0:58:05.800 --> 0:58:08.600
<v Speaker 1>If we're in a bit of a Joey Bosa echo chamber, yeah,

0:58:08.720 --> 0:58:11.240
<v Speaker 1>like that's kind of and you know it's my opinion.

0:58:11.360 --> 0:58:13.480
<v Speaker 1>Dane likes him a lot, and Dane could absolutely be

0:58:13.560 --> 0:58:16.240
<v Speaker 1>right about the player, and you know, it happens. And

0:58:16.280 --> 0:58:19.720
<v Speaker 1>I compared him to Greg Ellis. I compared Himcgreg Ellis

0:58:19.720 --> 0:58:22.960
<v Speaker 1>on the production on the six to eight sacks and

0:58:22.960 --> 0:58:25.800
<v Speaker 1>and and and unfair or not, that's what I saw.

0:58:26.160 --> 0:58:29.280
<v Speaker 1>And if people, if Sam and those guys, everybody's doing

0:58:29.280 --> 0:58:31.320
<v Speaker 1>their own work and they're trying to find out, Hey,

0:58:31.280 --> 0:58:34.600
<v Speaker 1>he goes, you know, watching these games, that's okay. I

0:58:34.640 --> 0:58:37.000
<v Speaker 1>feel like that I'm responsible for killing the guy. I

0:58:37.000 --> 0:58:38.920
<v Speaker 1>didn't mean to kill the guy. I just pointed out

0:58:38.960 --> 0:58:42.720
<v Speaker 1>what I see. But I think I'm online with him

0:58:42.760 --> 0:58:44.320
<v Speaker 1>though one of the main things can be good but

0:58:44.400 --> 0:58:46.240
<v Speaker 1>not great, one of the main issues, I think. And

0:58:46.800 --> 0:58:48.640
<v Speaker 1>caller kind of said that he doesn't think he's gonna

0:58:48.640 --> 0:58:51.640
<v Speaker 1>be DeMarcus Ware. Nobody is, but yeah, he shouldn't be

0:58:51.640 --> 0:58:53.440
<v Speaker 1>compared to it. I shouldn't be compared to him. But

0:58:53.440 --> 0:58:55.680
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people think, Okay, it's a fourth overall pick,

0:58:55.880 --> 0:58:59.480
<v Speaker 1>so I'm gonna you know, they translate the fourth overall

0:58:59.480 --> 0:59:01.720
<v Speaker 1>pick too future hall of famer, you know, But that's

0:59:01.760 --> 0:59:04.200
<v Speaker 1>just not always the case. I mean, this draft doesn't

0:59:04.240 --> 0:59:07.720
<v Speaker 1>have those generational guys that are going to be able

0:59:07.760 --> 0:59:09.480
<v Speaker 1>to come in and you know, make that type of

0:59:09.520 --> 0:59:11.880
<v Speaker 1>impact that de Marcus Ware did, So he shouldn't be

0:59:11.880 --> 0:59:15.520
<v Speaker 1>compared to the DeMarcus Ware. But I don't know, I don't.

0:59:16.320 --> 0:59:17.760
<v Speaker 1>To me, I see it on the tape. I see

0:59:17.760 --> 0:59:21.320
<v Speaker 1>a guy that the techniques there. I mean, he doesn't

0:59:21.320 --> 0:59:25.040
<v Speaker 1>need to be an elite speed guy to win. I

0:59:25.040 --> 0:59:27.440
<v Speaker 1>mean his testing numbers were very good and the three

0:59:27.480 --> 0:59:30.120
<v Speaker 1>cone in short shuttle was the only two or the

0:59:30.160 --> 0:59:32.920
<v Speaker 1>main two drills I care about for the pass rusher position.

0:59:33.000 --> 0:59:35.240
<v Speaker 1>So to me, nothing has changed. I think both. I

0:59:35.320 --> 0:59:38.240
<v Speaker 1>understand maybe if you think he's a six to eight

0:59:38.240 --> 0:59:40.600
<v Speaker 1>sack guy, totally get that. I'm not convinced he's going

0:59:40.640 --> 0:59:42.600
<v Speaker 1>to be a double digit sack guy. But I don't

0:59:42.600 --> 0:59:44.280
<v Speaker 1>think he need to be a double digit sack guy.

0:59:44.280 --> 0:59:46.320
<v Speaker 1>Had to impact the pocket. And you know, like I said,

0:59:46.360 --> 0:59:48.680
<v Speaker 1>von Miller had eleven sacks last year. See, yeah, you

0:59:48.680 --> 0:59:50.360
<v Speaker 1>don't need to be a double digit sac guy to

0:59:50.400 --> 0:59:53.040
<v Speaker 1>impact the pocket consistently. Yeah. I just I worry about

0:59:53.080 --> 0:59:55.479
<v Speaker 1>Chris Long. I worry about I worry about the guy

0:59:55.520 --> 0:59:57.640
<v Speaker 1>that plays and gets war down in week you know,

0:59:57.720 --> 1:00:00.400
<v Speaker 1>week fourteen, you're you're fighting for a playoff spot, and

1:00:00.400 --> 1:00:02.840
<v Speaker 1>all of a sudden, he's not. I saw Chris Long

1:00:02.920 --> 1:00:05.439
<v Speaker 1>do that this year. I saw looks great a week one.

1:00:05.560 --> 1:00:08.760
<v Speaker 1>By week fourteen, he's wore down, thirty years old now,

1:00:09.080 --> 1:00:12.120
<v Speaker 1>but the same he's the same type of player a

1:00:12.760 --> 1:00:14.840
<v Speaker 1>lot of Similarly, Chris Long had some pretty damn good

1:00:14.880 --> 1:00:17.200
<v Speaker 1>years when he was That's what I'm saying. And and

1:00:17.200 --> 1:00:18.440
<v Speaker 1>if he if he you know, if he has a

1:00:18.440 --> 1:00:20.760
<v Speaker 1>career like that, that's fine. But I'm just saying, though,

1:00:21.080 --> 1:00:25.080
<v Speaker 1>to me, I'm trying to think about I want that.

1:00:25.160 --> 1:00:27.840
<v Speaker 1>I want that difference maker. And I think and I

1:00:27.840 --> 1:00:30.120
<v Speaker 1>think he's gonna be a really good football player. I'm

1:00:30.120 --> 1:00:31.680
<v Speaker 1>not gonna say he's gonna be great. I think he's

1:00:31.680 --> 1:00:33.360
<v Speaker 1>gonna be a good football It would be one thing

1:00:33.440 --> 1:00:37.200
<v Speaker 1>if if this was the Jaguars sorry for throwing that

1:00:37.200 --> 1:00:39.840
<v Speaker 1>out though, but well, uh, this is a team that

1:00:39.880 --> 1:00:42.800
<v Speaker 1>hasn't been top five in twenty seven years, and from

1:00:42.800 --> 1:00:45.280
<v Speaker 1>the fans perspective, I just think they want something that's

1:00:45.320 --> 1:00:47.000
<v Speaker 1>going to move the needle a little bit more. And

1:00:47.040 --> 1:00:49.479
<v Speaker 1>I apologize to you. You could be right about Boss.

1:00:49.640 --> 1:00:51.800
<v Speaker 1>I would accept it if I'm wrong. I think we all,

1:00:51.800 --> 1:00:54.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean me included, we all like Ramsey better. So yeah,

1:00:54.560 --> 1:00:58.480
<v Speaker 1>if Sam wants Ramsey, Yeah, all right, listen, that's all

1:00:58.480 --> 1:01:00.680
<v Speaker 1>the time we have today for the Draft Show. I

1:01:00.720 --> 1:01:03.720
<v Speaker 1>want to specially thank Scott Purcell and Dave Urns and

1:01:03.800 --> 1:01:06.520
<v Speaker 1>Blake Silverthorne for kind of setting all this up for us.

1:01:06.920 --> 1:01:10.360
<v Speaker 1>I want to thank Dane Burglar, David Hellman, and Ken Garrison.

1:01:10.400 --> 1:01:13.120
<v Speaker 1>I want to thank you everybody out there for your tweets,

1:01:13.400 --> 1:01:17.439
<v Speaker 1>for your calls. Bradley, Sam, we appreciate you, guys. We'll

1:01:17.440 --> 1:01:20.080
<v Speaker 1>be back next week. We'll dive into some more, we'll

1:01:20.080 --> 1:01:21.720
<v Speaker 1>be a little bit closer to this draft. If you

1:01:21.760 --> 1:01:23.640
<v Speaker 1>have the opportunity to sit down and look at these players,

1:01:23.920 --> 1:01:26.520
<v Speaker 1>formulate your own opinion and go from there. So for

1:01:26.640 --> 1:01:28.440
<v Speaker 1>my crew here, we'll see you next time on the

1:01:28.480 --> 1:01:28.959
<v Speaker 1>Draft Show.