WEBVTT - The History of Fame

0:00:05.040 --> 0:00:10.879
<v Speaker 1>All presidents are sociopaths or at the very least psychologically unusual. Yeah.

0:00:10.880 --> 0:00:12.719
<v Speaker 1>I look in the mirror every morning and say, there

0:00:12.800 --> 0:00:15.000
<v Speaker 1>is no one else one. There's three hundred and fifty

0:00:15.040 --> 0:00:19.840
<v Speaker 1>million who can do the job I can. This is

0:00:19.840 --> 0:00:24.439
<v Speaker 1>a relatively new field, in part because of the growing

0:00:24.480 --> 0:00:28.880
<v Speaker 1>awareness that dogs weren't just pets, but the dogs also

0:00:28.960 --> 0:00:35.120
<v Speaker 1>have some real and tangible benefits. Willie Mays and Babe

0:00:35.240 --> 0:00:40.479
<v Speaker 1>Ruth athletes who weren't able to monetize themselves in the

0:00:40.560 --> 0:00:42.680
<v Speaker 1>way that they should have been able to. You know,

0:00:42.720 --> 0:00:47.240
<v Speaker 1>Serena is different. We've heard this so many times over

0:00:47.280 --> 0:00:50.840
<v Speaker 1>the years. When Diane and Charles divorce, the monarchy was over.

0:00:51.000 --> 0:00:54.480
<v Speaker 1>When Harry and Meghan gave the interview for OPRAH, people said,

0:00:54.480 --> 0:01:00.520
<v Speaker 1>the monarchy is over. Welcome to One Day University talks

0:01:00.520 --> 0:01:04.880
<v Speaker 1>with the world's most engaging and inspiring professors discussing their

0:01:04.880 --> 0:01:08.520
<v Speaker 1>most popular courses, the ones that students line up to hear.

0:01:08.720 --> 0:01:11.520
<v Speaker 1>The One Day University podcasts gives you a front row

0:01:11.560 --> 0:01:15.240
<v Speaker 1>seat to learn on your schedule. I'm Steven Schragis. Fifteen

0:01:15.319 --> 0:01:18.360
<v Speaker 1>years ago I founded One Day University to present top

0:01:18.400 --> 0:01:23.880
<v Speaker 1>performing professors on stages across the country. There's no homework, exams,

0:01:23.959 --> 0:01:27.440
<v Speaker 1>or student loans. It's learning for the sake of learning.

0:01:27.520 --> 0:01:30.240
<v Speaker 1>In each episode, I'll sit down with a different professor

0:01:30.400 --> 0:01:33.080
<v Speaker 1>to talk about one of their highly rated lectures. No

0:01:33.200 --> 0:01:36.600
<v Speaker 1>matter your interests, We've got you've covered. Our conversations will

0:01:36.640 --> 0:01:41.680
<v Speaker 1>include politics, history, science, music, arts, sports, and pop culture.

0:01:42.000 --> 0:01:45.200
<v Speaker 1>Our first episode falls into the pop culture category. The

0:01:45.360 --> 0:01:49.560
<v Speaker 1>ninety fifth Academy Awards were held last weekend, with Everything Everywhere,

0:01:49.600 --> 0:01:52.720
<v Speaker 1>All at Once winning Best Picture and six other Oscars.

0:01:52.920 --> 0:01:55.640
<v Speaker 1>Millions of people tuned in to see some famous faces,

0:01:55.800 --> 0:02:01.160
<v Speaker 1>including Lady Gaga, Nicole Kidman, Steven Spielberg, and Rihanna. Fans

0:02:01.160 --> 0:02:04.080
<v Speaker 1>of Tom Cruise may have been disappointed to learn that

0:02:04.120 --> 0:02:06.520
<v Speaker 1>he was a no show, even though his film Top

0:02:06.560 --> 0:02:10.880
<v Speaker 1>Gun Maverick was nominated for Best Picture. Professor Susan Douglas

0:02:11.040 --> 0:02:15.000
<v Speaker 1>has studied our relationship with the rich and famous. She

0:02:15.160 --> 0:02:18.480
<v Speaker 1>has a lecture for One Day University titled a History

0:02:18.480 --> 0:02:22.200
<v Speaker 1>of Fame The Power of Celebrity. She teaches communication and

0:02:22.320 --> 0:02:25.760
<v Speaker 1>Media at the University of Michigan, and she's written several

0:02:25.760 --> 0:02:29.280
<v Speaker 1>books on gender and mass media. With the Oscars behind us,

0:02:29.440 --> 0:02:32.800
<v Speaker 1>I was curious if Susan believed that movie stars still

0:02:32.840 --> 0:02:35.359
<v Speaker 1>even exist, or if they are a relic of the past.

0:02:38.360 --> 0:02:43.679
<v Speaker 1>I think it was a very unusual Oscar season. But

0:02:43.960 --> 0:02:47.080
<v Speaker 1>I do think we still have movie stars. But here's

0:02:47.120 --> 0:02:49.919
<v Speaker 1>the hitch. A lot of them have gone to television,

0:02:50.080 --> 0:02:53.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, in part because streaming has offered so many

0:02:53.160 --> 0:02:59.880
<v Speaker 1>opportunities to a list actors, Kevin Costner, Harrison Ford, Jane Fond,

0:03:00.280 --> 0:03:02.880
<v Speaker 1>what could go on and on. And this started with

0:03:03.040 --> 0:03:07.520
<v Speaker 1>the entrepreneurial work of Netflix and Amazon, and then COVID

0:03:07.600 --> 0:03:11.079
<v Speaker 1>hit and people stopped going to the movies. And so

0:03:11.480 --> 0:03:14.720
<v Speaker 1>I do think there are still movie stars. There are

0:03:14.840 --> 0:03:19.680
<v Speaker 1>more independent productions that are getting more attention, and maybe

0:03:19.680 --> 0:03:24.160
<v Speaker 1>people whose names we didn't quite recognize this Oscar cycle,

0:03:24.320 --> 0:03:29.040
<v Speaker 1>we'll become more recognizable in the future. But I don't

0:03:29.080 --> 0:03:31.760
<v Speaker 1>believe that Tom Cruise and a few others are the

0:03:31.840 --> 0:03:35.760
<v Speaker 1>only movie stars left. Let's start at the beginning with

0:03:35.880 --> 0:03:39.280
<v Speaker 1>the origins. Where did the word celebrity come from? Do

0:03:39.320 --> 0:03:42.080
<v Speaker 1>you have any idea. I'm not sure where it came from,

0:03:42.520 --> 0:03:45.760
<v Speaker 1>but it was certainly in use by the eighteen forties.

0:03:46.040 --> 0:03:50.520
<v Speaker 1>By that time, there were theatrical stars in the United States,

0:03:50.920 --> 0:03:54.400
<v Speaker 1>and so you began to get the emergence of the

0:03:54.440 --> 0:03:58.840
<v Speaker 1>notion of celebrity by mid century. Then why was there

0:03:58.880 --> 0:04:03.240
<v Speaker 1>this interest and need for celebrities and how responsible was

0:04:03.280 --> 0:04:07.240
<v Speaker 1>the media for this rise of celebrity culture. Then you

0:04:07.320 --> 0:04:13.040
<v Speaker 1>had a symbiotic relationship between the rise of inexpensive newspapers

0:04:13.120 --> 0:04:17.719
<v Speaker 1>meant for the general public, not expensive political papers, and

0:04:18.000 --> 0:04:24.760
<v Speaker 1>they needed content, and you had the ever expanding entertainment industry.

0:04:24.800 --> 0:04:28.159
<v Speaker 1>You know, first it was theaters, and then the circus,

0:04:28.360 --> 0:04:31.760
<v Speaker 1>and then by the late nineteenth century you had vaudeville,

0:04:32.240 --> 0:04:37.120
<v Speaker 1>and vaudeville wanted to promote its stars. Newspapers wanted content,

0:04:37.560 --> 0:04:40.760
<v Speaker 1>and so they worked together with each other. And of

0:04:40.800 --> 0:04:46.440
<v Speaker 1>course the media played a major role in producing which

0:04:46.440 --> 0:04:49.200
<v Speaker 1>stars were the best, you know, behind the scenes with

0:04:49.240 --> 0:04:52.440
<v Speaker 1>the stars, all of that, and they were fed a

0:04:52.440 --> 0:04:55.920
<v Speaker 1>lot of stuff by first vaudeville entrepreneurs and of course

0:04:56.279 --> 0:04:59.560
<v Speaker 1>then later and most famously, you know, the producers of

0:04:59.680 --> 0:05:03.360
<v Speaker 1>movie Okay, then let's talk about two types of stars. One,

0:05:03.400 --> 0:05:08.640
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned sports stars and movie stars. Specifically, I'm thinking

0:05:08.640 --> 0:05:12.760
<v Speaker 1>of Babe Ruth and Mary Pickford. These two were really important,

0:05:12.920 --> 0:05:15.400
<v Speaker 1>and in fact, movie studios were at first sort of

0:05:15.400 --> 0:05:18.640
<v Speaker 1>reluctant to even let this all happen. You want to

0:05:18.680 --> 0:05:22.040
<v Speaker 1>tell us about that, Yeah, sure, movie studios, you know,

0:05:22.560 --> 0:05:26.039
<v Speaker 1>very early on, this is the Nickelodeon period, you know,

0:05:27.040 --> 0:05:30.920
<v Speaker 1>from roughly nineteen oh five to round nineteen eleven, they

0:05:30.960 --> 0:05:34.280
<v Speaker 1>didn't want to put the names of the players on

0:05:34.320 --> 0:05:37.080
<v Speaker 1>the screen because they thought they would demand more money.

0:05:37.600 --> 0:05:40.479
<v Speaker 1>But what they found out is that viewers began to

0:05:41.000 --> 0:05:45.840
<v Speaker 1>respond to specific actors like Mary Pickford. Everybody referred to

0:05:45.880 --> 0:05:49.200
<v Speaker 1>her as the girl with the curls, and people wanted

0:05:49.200 --> 0:05:52.440
<v Speaker 1>to see more of the girl with the curls, for example.

0:05:52.760 --> 0:05:57.839
<v Speaker 1>So they began to realize by nineteen eleven it was

0:05:57.960 --> 0:06:02.480
<v Speaker 1>good box office to put people's names out because those

0:06:02.520 --> 0:06:07.040
<v Speaker 1>stars could then promote movies. So that's when the shift

0:06:07.160 --> 0:06:10.400
<v Speaker 1>begins to happen. And Babe Ruth was he really the

0:06:10.440 --> 0:06:15.000
<v Speaker 1>first sort of gigantic sports celebrity. He was. Yes, you know,

0:06:15.040 --> 0:06:18.640
<v Speaker 1>there were boxing stars, but boxing was very controversial at

0:06:18.640 --> 0:06:22.720
<v Speaker 1>the beginning of the nineteenth century because of interracial clashes

0:06:22.760 --> 0:06:25.919
<v Speaker 1>around who should be the world champion. But Babe Ruth,

0:06:26.080 --> 0:06:28.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, let's remember Babe Ruth when he was with

0:06:28.680 --> 0:06:32.400
<v Speaker 1>Red Sox. He was a great pitcher, and a great hitter,

0:06:32.560 --> 0:06:37.039
<v Speaker 1>like who can do that? And so he obviously had

0:06:37.360 --> 0:06:41.279
<v Speaker 1>enormous talent. And then when he went to the Yankees

0:06:41.360 --> 0:06:45.919
<v Speaker 1>and you kept hitting homer after homer and helping them

0:06:46.279 --> 0:06:51.719
<v Speaker 1>win World Series. By this time, baseball was not only

0:06:51.760 --> 0:06:56.320
<v Speaker 1>being covered in newspapers. By the nineteen twenty, star is

0:06:56.360 --> 0:07:00.400
<v Speaker 1>being covered by radio, and that enhanced his star them

0:07:00.440 --> 0:07:03.520
<v Speaker 1>even more. Okay, Susan, you mentioned radio. One part of

0:07:03.520 --> 0:07:06.960
<v Speaker 1>your talk, which I had found fascinating because I never

0:07:07.000 --> 0:07:10.560
<v Speaker 1>really thought about it before, was your explanation about how

0:07:10.560 --> 0:07:15.160
<v Speaker 1>it was radio that created many African American stars. Yeah.

0:07:15.200 --> 0:07:19.880
<v Speaker 1>So this really relates to the great migration that occurred

0:07:19.920 --> 0:07:22.960
<v Speaker 1>during World War One. There was a great need for

0:07:23.080 --> 0:07:28.200
<v Speaker 1>workers in cities and up north, and you had sixty

0:07:28.280 --> 0:07:33.640
<v Speaker 1>thousand African Americans migrate into Chicago. And some of those

0:07:33.680 --> 0:07:38.200
<v Speaker 1>migrants were jazz musicians who have been playing in the

0:07:38.320 --> 0:07:42.720
<v Speaker 1>bordelos in New Orleans. But the bordellos were shut down

0:07:42.800 --> 0:07:45.880
<v Speaker 1>as like a national security issue in New Orleans. So

0:07:46.080 --> 0:07:50.120
<v Speaker 1>people like Louis Armstrong ended up in Chicago. So you

0:07:50.240 --> 0:07:52.920
<v Speaker 1>had something that's very important in Chicago. You had a

0:07:53.040 --> 0:07:58.360
<v Speaker 1>market for black music and independent companies arose producing what

0:07:58.480 --> 0:08:02.520
<v Speaker 1>was called race music, and they were mostly recording either

0:08:02.680 --> 0:08:07.040
<v Speaker 1>blues Mamie Smith, Bessie Smith, but they were also recording

0:08:07.080 --> 0:08:12.080
<v Speaker 1>what was called hot jazz. And this music became hugely

0:08:12.360 --> 0:08:17.480
<v Speaker 1>popular and white listeners loved this music. And so even

0:08:17.480 --> 0:08:22.680
<v Speaker 1>though radio was, like all the media, very segregated, very

0:08:22.720 --> 0:08:30.680
<v Speaker 1>discriminatory against black performers, nonetheless, Louis Armstrong, Duke Ellington, Bessie Smith,

0:08:30.920 --> 0:08:33.640
<v Speaker 1>they all became stars on radio. And we have to

0:08:33.679 --> 0:08:38.520
<v Speaker 1>remember radio is a medium that denies sight to its audience,

0:08:38.920 --> 0:08:42.720
<v Speaker 1>and so it was easier for black stars to become

0:08:42.800 --> 0:08:45.599
<v Speaker 1>stars on a medium like that. Let's move on to

0:08:45.679 --> 0:08:48.960
<v Speaker 1>something very different. Walter Winchell and the rise of gossip.

0:08:49.040 --> 0:08:52.560
<v Speaker 1>Who was he and why was the gossip industry so important?

0:08:52.679 --> 0:08:57.520
<v Speaker 1>So gossip columns had started in the nineteen twenties and

0:08:57.559 --> 0:08:59.680
<v Speaker 1>they basically kind of fell on the heels of the

0:08:59.760 --> 0:09:04.400
<v Speaker 1>rye of movie magazines. You know, movie magazines starred in lateeens,

0:09:04.480 --> 0:09:07.600
<v Speaker 1>early twenties. So Winchell started out, you know, as a

0:09:07.600 --> 0:09:11.800
<v Speaker 1>newspaper gossip columnist, and he moved to radio in the

0:09:11.840 --> 0:09:16.200
<v Speaker 1>early nineteen thirties, and he had this rat tat style

0:09:16.360 --> 0:09:22.280
<v Speaker 1>of delivery, and he mixed news with celebrity gossip and

0:09:22.360 --> 0:09:26.240
<v Speaker 1>celebrity dirt. And he had a way of inventing all

0:09:26.320 --> 0:09:32.720
<v Speaker 1>kinds of language in terms to stand for divorce, romantic liaisons, etc.

0:09:33.640 --> 0:09:41.400
<v Speaker 1>And so what Winchell did is he melded legit news

0:09:41.880 --> 0:09:46.160
<v Speaker 1>with gossip, bringing gossip into broadcasting for the first time,

0:09:46.400 --> 0:09:50.760
<v Speaker 1>and he became enormously influential because of that, he could

0:09:50.800 --> 0:09:54.160
<v Speaker 1>make or break careers. I mean, hardly anybody has heard

0:09:54.200 --> 0:09:57.920
<v Speaker 1>of Walter Winchell now, but Walter Winchell from the nineteen

0:09:58.000 --> 0:10:04.120
<v Speaker 1>thirties until the early nineteen fifties was a superstar and enormously,

0:10:04.320 --> 0:10:08.199
<v Speaker 1>enormously influential, and you know, forty million people listened to him.

0:10:08.320 --> 0:10:13.680
<v Speaker 1>So if he wanted to condemn your career, he could.

0:10:13.840 --> 0:10:16.840
<v Speaker 1>It seems to me that People Magazine has been around forever,

0:10:17.160 --> 0:10:20.200
<v Speaker 1>but as you point out, it hasn't. That's not true.

0:10:20.400 --> 0:10:25.160
<v Speaker 1>Why was People Magazine so important in this area of fame? Okay,

0:10:25.200 --> 0:10:30.400
<v Speaker 1>So the story about People Magazine is that Time Magazine

0:10:31.040 --> 0:10:35.120
<v Speaker 1>was doing focus groups, doing research on you know, people's

0:10:35.120 --> 0:10:39.080
<v Speaker 1>engagement with Time magazine, and what they found was that

0:10:39.240 --> 0:10:44.280
<v Speaker 1>whenever somebody got Time Magazine, the first section they went

0:10:44.320 --> 0:10:47.320
<v Speaker 1>to was in the back of the book People, and

0:10:47.360 --> 0:10:51.320
<v Speaker 1>they said, Aha, let's start a whole magazine. This was

0:10:51.360 --> 0:10:55.120
<v Speaker 1>in nineteen seventy four, and of course it became a

0:10:55.240 --> 0:10:59.880
<v Speaker 1>smash hit, and the early People magazine had a mix

0:11:00.160 --> 0:11:03.599
<v Speaker 1>of celebrities and everyday people that they wanted to profile.

0:11:04.200 --> 0:11:07.360
<v Speaker 1>And during this period in the nineteen seventies, you begin

0:11:07.440 --> 0:11:11.079
<v Speaker 1>to get the early metastasizing of celebrity culture because you

0:11:11.160 --> 0:11:14.760
<v Speaker 1>get People, and then you get Us Weekly, the imitator.

0:11:15.040 --> 0:11:19.200
<v Speaker 1>You get Barbara Walters specials in the mid nineteen seventies,

0:11:19.240 --> 0:11:22.600
<v Speaker 1>you know where she starts interviewing celebrities. By the early

0:11:22.679 --> 0:11:27.319
<v Speaker 1>nineteen eighties, where you're getting Entertainment Tonight and then Lifestyles

0:11:27.360 --> 0:11:30.600
<v Speaker 1>of the rich and famous. So you're beginning to get

0:11:30.640 --> 0:11:35.480
<v Speaker 1>this kind of rolling building up of celebrity culture. Tell

0:11:35.559 --> 0:11:37.880
<v Speaker 1>us a little bit more about what you called the

0:11:37.960 --> 0:11:42.000
<v Speaker 1>blurring of the lines between news and entertainment. Why did

0:11:42.080 --> 0:11:45.880
<v Speaker 1>news expand its coverage of celebrities so much? Well, you know,

0:11:45.920 --> 0:11:48.880
<v Speaker 1>as I noted earlier, this really started with Walter Rinchell

0:11:49.080 --> 0:11:54.040
<v Speaker 1>bringing gossip into news, and for a while, when television

0:11:54.080 --> 0:12:00.000
<v Speaker 1>news was establishing its credibility, we didn't have much coverage

0:12:00.320 --> 0:12:05.079
<v Speaker 1>of celebrity in the nightly news. That began to change

0:12:05.280 --> 0:12:09.280
<v Speaker 1>in the nineteen eighties and beyond. One of the reasons

0:12:10.000 --> 0:12:13.520
<v Speaker 1>is that the news divisions of the networks in the

0:12:13.600 --> 0:12:17.480
<v Speaker 1>late nineteen eighties were spun off of the entertainment divisions,

0:12:17.880 --> 0:12:20.720
<v Speaker 1>meaning that the entertainment divisions which were making all this money,

0:12:20.960 --> 0:12:24.640
<v Speaker 1>were not carrying the news divisions anymore. Now the news

0:12:24.640 --> 0:12:27.960
<v Speaker 1>divisions had to make it on their own, and they

0:12:28.000 --> 0:12:30.760
<v Speaker 1>had to have good ratings and all the rest. And

0:12:30.840 --> 0:12:34.720
<v Speaker 1>so you began to see like Dan Rather on the

0:12:34.840 --> 0:12:39.560
<v Speaker 1>nightly news covering the divorce of Mike Tyson and Robin Gibbons,

0:12:39.640 --> 0:12:41.800
<v Speaker 1>and you're like, what is that? And then of course

0:12:41.840 --> 0:12:45.920
<v Speaker 1>you have the proliferation of cable, first cable news and

0:12:45.960 --> 0:12:51.240
<v Speaker 1>then cable shows, and so cable twenty four hour cable.

0:12:51.400 --> 0:12:56.960
<v Speaker 1>There's a twenty four seven maw that needs to be filled, right,

0:12:57.480 --> 0:13:01.360
<v Speaker 1>and there isn't that much politics all the time. And

0:13:01.800 --> 0:13:05.679
<v Speaker 1>also foreign news bureaus were cut, so you fill that

0:13:06.040 --> 0:13:10.560
<v Speaker 1>with stories about Britney spears. Celebrity news is cheap, you

0:13:10.600 --> 0:13:14.360
<v Speaker 1>can recycle it, people flock to it, and at the

0:13:14.440 --> 0:13:21.000
<v Speaker 1>same time we start to get more and more politicians

0:13:21.800 --> 0:13:26.520
<v Speaker 1>being treated like celebrities. And of course, the ultimate blurring

0:13:26.640 --> 0:13:32.360
<v Speaker 1>moment is twenty sixteen when you have the star of

0:13:32.400 --> 0:13:37.400
<v Speaker 1>a reality TV show transform that into becoming president of

0:13:37.440 --> 0:13:41.760
<v Speaker 1>the United States. So, you know, we're at a really

0:13:41.800 --> 0:13:47.280
<v Speaker 1>odd moment now where politics is as much or more

0:13:48.280 --> 0:13:52.640
<v Speaker 1>entertainment as it is public policy and politics. This has

0:13:52.679 --> 0:13:57.320
<v Speaker 1>been a long process and here we are. After the break,

0:13:57.440 --> 0:14:00.800
<v Speaker 1>we'll explore social media's impact on fame and the religious

0:14:00.880 --> 0:14:08.679
<v Speaker 1>undertones of celebrity worship. You described three different types of

0:14:08.720 --> 0:14:14.880
<v Speaker 1>celebrity ascribed, achieved, and attributed. So what's the difference between

0:14:14.960 --> 0:14:20.680
<v Speaker 1>those three? So achieved is obvious, You've earned it, Lebron James,

0:14:21.440 --> 0:14:26.040
<v Speaker 1>Meryl Street, the Rolling Stones. You know, people admired for

0:14:26.280 --> 0:14:32.120
<v Speaker 1>their obvious talent and achievements. Ascribed is you were born

0:14:32.200 --> 0:14:36.160
<v Speaker 1>into it. And right now we have a very prominent

0:14:36.320 --> 0:14:40.720
<v Speaker 1>ascribed celebrity, Prince Harry with the number one bestselling book

0:14:40.880 --> 0:14:44.400
<v Speaker 1>Spare And so you're a child of a celebrity, You're

0:14:44.400 --> 0:14:46.960
<v Speaker 1>born into the royal family. You had nothing to do

0:14:47.040 --> 0:14:52.560
<v Speaker 1>with it. Some ascribed celebrities remain celebrities and others don't.

0:14:52.960 --> 0:14:59.040
<v Speaker 1>And then attributed is it happens to you, usually through

0:14:59.760 --> 0:15:03.800
<v Speaker 1>US scandal or some kind of other event. Nobody knew

0:15:04.000 --> 0:15:08.920
<v Speaker 1>who Monica Lewinsky was right until the scandal of her

0:15:09.120 --> 0:15:13.000
<v Speaker 1>relationship with Bill Clinton comes out, and all of a sudden,

0:15:13.560 --> 0:15:17.760
<v Speaker 1>she is famous. She is well known simply because she

0:15:17.960 --> 0:15:21.840
<v Speaker 1>is caught in a scandal. Some other examples, if attributed

0:15:21.960 --> 0:15:24.840
<v Speaker 1>can be one hit wonders, a lottery winner can be

0:15:24.880 --> 0:15:27.560
<v Speaker 1>famous for a short period of time and it goes away.

0:15:27.760 --> 0:15:33.120
<v Speaker 1>Often attributed celebrity is the one that most rapidly fades.

0:15:33.400 --> 0:15:37.400
<v Speaker 1>The notion of what is and who is newsworthy has

0:15:37.480 --> 0:15:41.520
<v Speaker 1>changed dramatically. Seems like anyone can be a star. You

0:15:41.560 --> 0:15:44.200
<v Speaker 1>want to talk a little bit about that. Yes, there's

0:15:44.240 --> 0:15:47.480
<v Speaker 1>a term for this called the demotic turn, which comes

0:15:47.560 --> 0:15:51.400
<v Speaker 1>from the word democracy. And this really began around the

0:15:51.480 --> 0:15:55.840
<v Speaker 1>year two thousand. So there were stars of big hit shows,

0:15:56.360 --> 0:16:00.600
<v Speaker 1>friends er. The shows were doing incredibly well. The stars

0:16:00.720 --> 0:16:03.760
<v Speaker 1>kept demanding more money because they were making a lot

0:16:03.800 --> 0:16:06.280
<v Speaker 1>of money for the networks at the time. And after

0:16:06.360 --> 0:16:09.920
<v Speaker 1>a while, the networks were getting fed up with it

0:16:10.120 --> 0:16:13.640
<v Speaker 1>because they wanted to keep their profit margins high. And meanwhile,

0:16:13.640 --> 0:16:17.240
<v Speaker 1>there had been this little show on MTV called The

0:16:17.280 --> 0:16:20.320
<v Speaker 1>real World. He throw seven people together an apartment, see

0:16:20.360 --> 0:16:23.360
<v Speaker 1>what happens. That started in nineteen ninety two. By the

0:16:23.440 --> 0:16:26.560
<v Speaker 1>late nineties, it was doing very well for MTV. So

0:16:26.600 --> 0:16:30.680
<v Speaker 1>then we get this show called Survivor. The first episode

0:16:31.280 --> 0:16:35.240
<v Speaker 1>of Survivor was a smash hit, and that led to

0:16:35.440 --> 0:16:39.560
<v Speaker 1>more and more reality TV. Now why was reality TV

0:16:40.480 --> 0:16:45.400
<v Speaker 1>produced on MOSS It was so much cheaper to produce

0:16:46.000 --> 0:16:50.000
<v Speaker 1>than scripted shows. You could get people who would be

0:16:50.040 --> 0:16:52.440
<v Speaker 1>on those shows for free because they wanted to be

0:16:52.480 --> 0:16:56.920
<v Speaker 1>on television, and so you were cutting your costs way down,

0:16:57.000 --> 0:17:00.120
<v Speaker 1>and boom you get the explosion of reality to V.

0:17:00.640 --> 0:17:04.119
<v Speaker 1>And then, of course this intersects with the rise of

0:17:04.200 --> 0:17:10.120
<v Speaker 1>social media, right and people beginning to think, you know,

0:17:10.600 --> 0:17:15.000
<v Speaker 1>maybe I can become a star on Instagram. And of course,

0:17:15.080 --> 0:17:18.359
<v Speaker 1>more recently we now have TikTok stars and we have

0:17:18.520 --> 0:17:25.440
<v Speaker 1>YouTube stars, people who have basically crafted themselves into personalities

0:17:25.680 --> 0:17:31.040
<v Speaker 1>through social media. So when this term demotic turn was coined,

0:17:31.200 --> 0:17:37.680
<v Speaker 1>it barely anticipated the rampant democratization of celebrity in our culture.

0:17:37.800 --> 0:17:40.880
<v Speaker 1>Here's another phrase I learned from your lecture that sounded

0:17:41.080 --> 0:17:46.760
<v Speaker 1>very scientific to me. Parasocial interaction. What's that all about? Yeah,

0:17:46.760 --> 0:17:51.400
<v Speaker 1>it's a complicated term for something we all do. So, Steve,

0:17:51.920 --> 0:17:55.520
<v Speaker 1>have you ever sat in front of your television set

0:17:56.200 --> 0:18:00.960
<v Speaker 1>and yelled at a newscaster as if he or she

0:18:01.040 --> 0:18:05.600
<v Speaker 1>could hear you, or in a horror film, don't go

0:18:05.640 --> 0:18:11.480
<v Speaker 1>in there, don't go in there. Parasocial relationships refer to

0:18:11.880 --> 0:18:17.800
<v Speaker 1>us having imagined relationships with people as if we know them,

0:18:18.359 --> 0:18:21.160
<v Speaker 1>as if they can hear us, when, of course it's

0:18:21.160 --> 0:18:24.719
<v Speaker 1>a very asymmetrical relationship. You know, we may know a

0:18:24.760 --> 0:18:28.560
<v Speaker 1>ton about Jennifer Aniston, she has no idea who I am, right,

0:18:28.880 --> 0:18:33.719
<v Speaker 1>and so parasocial relationships are the relationships that we form

0:18:34.320 --> 0:18:39.120
<v Speaker 1>with stars, and so some people can have very strong

0:18:39.280 --> 0:18:43.760
<v Speaker 1>parasocial relationships, you know, be very devoted fans. A parasocial

0:18:43.800 --> 0:18:46.919
<v Speaker 1>relationship can also be negative, right, I could have a

0:18:47.000 --> 0:18:53.439
<v Speaker 1>very strong negative parasocial hatred of somebody famous. So, but

0:18:53.520 --> 0:18:57.120
<v Speaker 1>that's what it refers to, is that connection that every

0:18:57.200 --> 0:19:00.960
<v Speaker 1>day people have often powerful with as people. Can you

0:19:01.040 --> 0:19:05.200
<v Speaker 1>comment on some of the privileges and power of celebrity

0:19:05.480 --> 0:19:09.560
<v Speaker 1>and and some of the drawbacks for both celebrities and

0:19:09.640 --> 0:19:13.360
<v Speaker 1>for the people who become so invested in their lives. So, look,

0:19:13.440 --> 0:19:19.680
<v Speaker 1>celebrities have a wider voice in the world than we do.

0:19:20.040 --> 0:19:23.080
<v Speaker 1>They go to the front of the line. I don't

0:19:23.119 --> 0:19:27.399
<v Speaker 1>imagine Tom Cruise ever having to go to the Division

0:19:27.480 --> 0:19:30.320
<v Speaker 1>of motor vehicles and waiting, you know, two hours to

0:19:30.359 --> 0:19:32.440
<v Speaker 1>get as light as renewed. They go to the head

0:19:32.480 --> 0:19:35.800
<v Speaker 1>of the line. So you know, those are some of

0:19:35.840 --> 0:19:42.199
<v Speaker 1>the privileges that they get downfall or you know, the

0:19:42.320 --> 0:19:48.440
<v Speaker 1>anti privileges is really loss of privacy. Many celebrities really

0:19:48.560 --> 0:19:52.320
<v Speaker 1>hate the loss of privacy. They are under scrutiny all

0:19:52.400 --> 0:19:57.280
<v Speaker 1>the time. One slight mistake and especially now in the

0:19:57.320 --> 0:19:59.840
<v Speaker 1>era of social media. Boy, you know, can you get

0:20:00.000 --> 0:20:02.760
<v Speaker 1>banged up on on one slip of the tongue or

0:20:02.800 --> 0:20:07.320
<v Speaker 1>one mistake. And I will say in particular really worrying

0:20:07.320 --> 0:20:10.760
<v Speaker 1>about the privacy of your children, which has become a

0:20:10.800 --> 0:20:13.560
<v Speaker 1>big deal for a lot of celebrities. Those are some

0:20:14.240 --> 0:20:18.680
<v Speaker 1>really quite serious downsides. There's what some people would would

0:20:18.680 --> 0:20:24.600
<v Speaker 1>actually call a religious aspect to celebrity fascination, including pilgrimages

0:20:24.880 --> 0:20:28.000
<v Speaker 1>to important sites like the one in Memphis, and you

0:20:28.040 --> 0:20:30.639
<v Speaker 1>know what I'm talking about. So Grace Land is of

0:20:30.680 --> 0:20:36.080
<v Speaker 1>course a complete monument to Elvis and his grave is there,

0:20:37.000 --> 0:20:40.200
<v Speaker 1>and I went there with some colleagues on an off day,

0:20:41.200 --> 0:20:46.639
<v Speaker 1>and there were fans laying flowers on the grave. So

0:20:47.000 --> 0:20:51.880
<v Speaker 1>in terms of religion, there is, you know, a hypothesis

0:20:52.000 --> 0:20:56.760
<v Speaker 1>that celebrity worship is kind of a substitute for religion.

0:20:57.240 --> 0:21:01.960
<v Speaker 1>And if you've been to any rock concerts recently, think

0:21:02.000 --> 0:21:06.840
<v Speaker 1>about how the stars are beautifully lit on the stage,

0:21:07.400 --> 0:21:13.200
<v Speaker 1>almost haload. They are above us, they are illuminated. We're below.

0:21:13.640 --> 0:21:17.800
<v Speaker 1>Maybe we're holding candles, you know, to pay tribute to them.

0:21:18.200 --> 0:21:21.560
<v Speaker 1>We sing along with them. They're above us. They're like gods.

0:21:21.960 --> 0:21:27.199
<v Speaker 1>The way that musical stars in particular are staged is

0:21:27.480 --> 0:21:35.280
<v Speaker 1>very godlike, and people can become obsessed with what we

0:21:35.440 --> 0:21:39.679
<v Speaker 1>call reliquaries, you know, a shock of somebody's hair, a

0:21:39.720 --> 0:21:43.560
<v Speaker 1>piece of Michael Jackson's clothing, whatever. So some have argued

0:21:43.600 --> 0:21:49.760
<v Speaker 1>that there is a religiosity to celebrity worship and celebrity culture.

0:21:49.840 --> 0:21:54.280
<v Speaker 1>There were two Oscar nominated films that focused on past

0:21:54.400 --> 0:21:58.960
<v Speaker 1>movie stars, Elvis and Blonde, which was about Marilyn Monroe.

0:21:59.040 --> 0:22:02.560
<v Speaker 1>Why do you think they're still making movies about those

0:22:02.600 --> 0:22:07.439
<v Speaker 1>two and others so many decades later. There are certain stars,

0:22:07.600 --> 0:22:13.360
<v Speaker 1>especially those who've died young, who've died tragically who are

0:22:13.480 --> 0:22:19.320
<v Speaker 1>preserved forever in their use. And James Dean is another one. Right,

0:22:19.440 --> 0:22:24.000
<v Speaker 1>we go back and revisit these stars in their youthful beauty,

0:22:24.640 --> 0:22:30.560
<v Speaker 1>and what these stars kind of symbolize for us is

0:22:30.560 --> 0:22:36.159
<v Speaker 1>a kind of immortality, because yes, Marilyn Monroe is long gone,

0:22:36.520 --> 0:22:41.920
<v Speaker 1>Elvis is long gone, but we have posters of them,

0:22:42.000 --> 0:22:47.840
<v Speaker 1>we have their music, their films, They live on in

0:22:48.560 --> 0:22:53.080
<v Speaker 1>all kinds of imagery and sound. It appeals to some

0:22:53.200 --> 0:22:59.879
<v Speaker 1>notion of not really ever dying. That again ties in

0:23:00.240 --> 0:23:05.520
<v Speaker 1>with our fantasies about and relationship with stars. Okay, Susan,

0:23:05.640 --> 0:23:10.200
<v Speaker 1>one last question. Do you think the existence of celebrities

0:23:10.640 --> 0:23:16.520
<v Speaker 1>has an overall positive or negative effect on society and culture? Well, Steven,

0:23:16.600 --> 0:23:18.960
<v Speaker 1>I'd like to turn that question around a little bit

0:23:19.440 --> 0:23:24.159
<v Speaker 1>and ask what do celebrities provide? What do they take away?

0:23:24.480 --> 0:23:29.040
<v Speaker 1>What do they justify? And so celebrities in if you

0:23:29.080 --> 0:23:34.240
<v Speaker 1>want to go with a positive route, they provide everyday

0:23:34.280 --> 0:23:39.919
<v Speaker 1>people with role models. They provide everyday people with aspirational

0:23:40.040 --> 0:23:45.120
<v Speaker 1>stories about success. They provide everyday people with a kind

0:23:45.119 --> 0:23:48.959
<v Speaker 1>of social glue. So you know, if I am sitting

0:23:48.960 --> 0:23:52.400
<v Speaker 1>next to you on an airplane and we start talking,

0:23:53.080 --> 0:23:56.520
<v Speaker 1>and there's been a political scandal and a celebrity scandal.

0:23:57.080 --> 0:23:58.720
<v Speaker 1>The last thing I'm going to do is talk to

0:23:58.760 --> 0:24:01.159
<v Speaker 1>you about the political scan given the part as a

0:24:01.280 --> 0:24:04.720
<v Speaker 1>nature or politics right now, but a celebrity scandal, you

0:24:04.800 --> 0:24:08.480
<v Speaker 1>and I can be experts on that have a moral

0:24:08.520 --> 0:24:13.480
<v Speaker 1>compass about it, and in our conversation we affirm our

0:24:13.520 --> 0:24:16.919
<v Speaker 1>own morality about right and wrong. I think some of

0:24:16.920 --> 0:24:23.600
<v Speaker 1>the damaging things about celebrity culture is they enact standards

0:24:23.640 --> 0:24:28.280
<v Speaker 1>of beauty and slimness and youth that very few people

0:24:28.359 --> 0:24:31.320
<v Speaker 1>kind of achieve, yet too many people seek to measure

0:24:31.359 --> 0:24:38.440
<v Speaker 1>themselves by. They justify hierarchies of race and class, They

0:24:38.480 --> 0:24:45.040
<v Speaker 1>make hierarchies seem thrilling. They justify having way too much money.

0:24:45.960 --> 0:24:50.200
<v Speaker 1>And I think there are some problems with celebrity culture,

0:24:50.359 --> 0:24:55.240
<v Speaker 1>and they kind of legitimate a notion of who deserves

0:24:55.320 --> 0:24:59.439
<v Speaker 1>what and who doesn't deserve certain things. Susan, thank you

0:24:59.520 --> 0:25:02.199
<v Speaker 1>so much again for doing this. We really appreciate it.

0:25:02.240 --> 0:25:05.919
<v Speaker 1>With such an interesting subject and an unusual subject, I

0:25:06.040 --> 0:25:08.600
<v Speaker 1>learned a lot. I hope our listeners did too. Thanks

0:25:08.600 --> 0:25:11.159
<v Speaker 1>for joining us, Thanks for having me, it was great fun.

0:25:12.720 --> 0:25:15.440
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for joining us here. At One Day University. Sign

0:25:15.520 --> 0:25:18.439
<v Speaker 1>up at our website one dayu dot com to become

0:25:18.440 --> 0:25:21.800
<v Speaker 1>a member and access over seven hundred full length video

0:25:21.920 --> 0:25:25.880
<v Speaker 1>lectures from the world's finest professors. You could also download

0:25:25.880 --> 0:25:29.040
<v Speaker 1>our app. There you can learn more about today's episode

0:25:29.359 --> 0:25:33.479
<v Speaker 1>and watch University of Michigan Professor Susan Douglas's lecture on

0:25:33.600 --> 0:25:36.439
<v Speaker 1>fame and Celebrity, as well as her talks on the

0:25:36.520 --> 0:25:41.480
<v Speaker 1>history of radio pagism and more. Join us next time

0:25:41.800 --> 0:25:44.440
<v Speaker 1>when we talk about the Biden presidency. I would put

0:25:44.480 --> 0:25:49.080
<v Speaker 1>his legislati accomplishments up against almost anyone's since Franklin Roosevelt

0:25:49.160 --> 0:25:51.879
<v Speaker 1>or Lyndon Johnson for the first two years of his presidency.

0:25:52.080 --> 0:25:55.639
<v Speaker 1>One Day University is a production of iHeart Podcasts and

0:25:55.800 --> 0:25:58.720
<v Speaker 1>School of Humans. If you're enjoying the show, leave a

0:25:58.760 --> 0:26:01.200
<v Speaker 1>review in your favorite podcas gust Out. You can also

0:26:01.320 --> 0:26:05.719
<v Speaker 1>check out other Curiosity podcasts to learn about history, pop culture,

0:26:05.800 --> 0:26:19.680
<v Speaker 1>true crime, and more. School of Humans