WEBVTT - Selects: What's the deal with subpoenas?

0:00:01.040 --> 0:00:01.960
<v Speaker 1>How to everybody.

0:00:02.040 --> 0:00:04.160
<v Speaker 2>I'm just staring at this subpoena on my desk that

0:00:04.240 --> 0:00:06.880
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to ignore because I don't care about the

0:00:06.960 --> 0:00:07.640
<v Speaker 2>rule of law.

0:00:08.520 --> 0:00:09.000
<v Speaker 1>This, Chuck.

0:00:09.039 --> 0:00:13.240
<v Speaker 2>It's Saturday, and from October twenty nineteen, we are replaying

0:00:13.320 --> 0:00:17.840
<v Speaker 2>this episode about subpoenas. It's called What's the Deal with Subpoenas? Or,

0:00:17.880 --> 0:00:21.720
<v Speaker 2>as Jerry Seinfeld might say, h what's the deal with subpoenas?

0:00:22.560 --> 0:00:24.880
<v Speaker 2>That's my best Jerry Seinfeld. I hope you enjoyed it.

0:00:29.600 --> 0:00:37.360
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Stuff you should know, a production of iHeartRadio.

0:00:39.200 --> 0:00:40.720
<v Speaker 3>Hey, welcome to the podcast.

0:00:40.760 --> 0:00:43.680
<v Speaker 4>I'm Josh Clark, and there's Charles w Chuck Bryant, and

0:00:43.720 --> 0:00:48.760
<v Speaker 4>there's Jerry Jerome Rowland over there, the Legal Eagles of podcasting.

0:00:49.760 --> 0:00:51.199
<v Speaker 1>Ooh, can I be Daryl Hannah?

0:00:51.320 --> 0:00:54.520
<v Speaker 3>Yes, I call Barbara Hershey.

0:00:54.640 --> 0:00:55.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't think so.

0:00:55.600 --> 0:00:59.800
<v Speaker 2>Who was it, oh, Legal Eagles? I know Deborah Winger? Yes,

0:01:00.160 --> 0:01:01.600
<v Speaker 2>was Daryl Hannah even in that now.

0:01:01.720 --> 0:01:03.720
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, she was the client of Deborah Winger.

0:01:03.840 --> 0:01:05.319
<v Speaker 1>Okay, and you're not Redford?

0:01:06.319 --> 0:01:10.000
<v Speaker 4>No, they always have to be Redford. Everybody's always like that.

0:01:10.120 --> 0:01:13.680
<v Speaker 4>Guy's a regular Robert Redford. He'll play him in this scenario.

0:01:13.400 --> 0:01:16.120
<v Speaker 1>Right, that's that's the street chatter.

0:01:16.560 --> 0:01:16.800
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:01:16.840 --> 0:01:19.080
<v Speaker 4>Can I still be Barbara Hershey even though she wasn't

0:01:19.080 --> 0:01:22.200
<v Speaker 4>in the movie. Sure, I think I'm thinking of beaches.

0:01:22.840 --> 0:01:25.759
<v Speaker 1>Oh well, that means I get to be Bette Midler, right.

0:01:26.120 --> 0:01:29.160
<v Speaker 4>I wonder how many podsave America listeners we just lost

0:01:29.200 --> 0:01:31.440
<v Speaker 4>to it just casually decided to give us a chance.

0:01:31.640 --> 0:01:35.240
<v Speaker 1>I want to learn about subpoenas, all right. Before we

0:01:35.280 --> 0:01:36.240
<v Speaker 1>get going, though, can we.

0:01:36.360 --> 0:01:40.640
<v Speaker 2>Quickly thank the cities of Orlando and Greater Orlando and

0:01:40.640 --> 0:01:45.319
<v Speaker 2>Florida and New Orleans and Greater Louisiana. Yes, for two

0:01:45.440 --> 0:01:46.360
<v Speaker 2>fun live shows.

0:01:46.480 --> 0:01:49.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, those were a lot of fun. Let's see.

0:01:49.240 --> 0:01:52.600
<v Speaker 4>We did Orlando on October ninth, I think, and then

0:01:53.600 --> 0:01:57.120
<v Speaker 4>the tenth for New Orleans. Regardless, it was night back

0:01:57.160 --> 0:01:59.520
<v Speaker 4>to back, two fun filled nights, and they were just

0:01:59.560 --> 0:02:00.559
<v Speaker 4>both the main shows.

0:02:00.880 --> 0:02:01.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:02:01.240 --> 0:02:03.680
<v Speaker 2>And when this comes out, I think New York will

0:02:03.680 --> 0:02:05.000
<v Speaker 2>have been over. So thank you New York.

0:02:05.400 --> 0:02:08.600
<v Speaker 4>Oh yeah, yeah, we we presume it's going to have

0:02:08.639 --> 0:02:10.840
<v Speaker 4>been a great time that three night run at the Bellhouse.

0:02:10.840 --> 0:02:11.760
<v Speaker 1>They're always great there.

0:02:13.440 --> 0:02:14.160
<v Speaker 3>And that's it too.

0:02:14.200 --> 0:02:16.640
<v Speaker 4>That's it for us for the for the year, Chuck,

0:02:17.080 --> 0:02:19.240
<v Speaker 4>So I mean thank you to everybody who came out

0:02:19.280 --> 0:02:20.480
<v Speaker 4>to see our shows this year.

0:02:20.560 --> 0:02:25.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, can we go ahead and tease our our January

0:02:25.040 --> 0:02:26.520
<v Speaker 2>schedule for should we not?

0:02:26.880 --> 0:02:27.880
<v Speaker 3>I think we can sure?

0:02:28.200 --> 0:02:29.040
<v Speaker 1>All right, well, well.

0:02:28.880 --> 0:02:31.799
<v Speaker 2>We're hoping to be back at sketch Fest again. And

0:02:31.840 --> 0:02:33.040
<v Speaker 2>then what did we settle on?

0:02:34.120 --> 0:02:36.920
<v Speaker 4>We I don't know settling is the right way to

0:02:36.919 --> 0:02:40.679
<v Speaker 4>put it up. We decided between the Seattle. We're doing Seattle,

0:02:40.760 --> 0:02:44.240
<v Speaker 4>oh we are, yeah, and normally for a January swing

0:02:44.280 --> 0:02:48.919
<v Speaker 4>we do Portland Seattle sketch Fest. Right, Well, we've got

0:02:48.919 --> 0:02:52.160
<v Speaker 4>the iHeart Radio Awards in there in Los Angeles and

0:02:52.200 --> 0:02:56.600
<v Speaker 4>we just you know, kind of have to go to that. No, sorry,

0:02:56.639 --> 0:02:58.960
<v Speaker 4>the iHeart Podcast Awards. They don't care about us at

0:02:58.960 --> 0:03:00.280
<v Speaker 4>all at the radio now.

0:03:00.360 --> 0:03:01.960
<v Speaker 1>We can't even get in that building.

0:03:01.720 --> 0:03:02.320
<v Speaker 3>Right exactly.

0:03:02.560 --> 0:03:04.880
<v Speaker 4>So we said, okay, well we gotta we gotta pull

0:03:04.919 --> 0:03:07.520
<v Speaker 4>out one of our shows because we're old men and

0:03:07.560 --> 0:03:09.520
<v Speaker 4>we just can't spend that much time on the road.

0:03:09.919 --> 0:03:12.680
<v Speaker 4>So instead we're going to take Portland and put it

0:03:12.720 --> 0:03:15.040
<v Speaker 4>with another town in the spring.

0:03:15.160 --> 0:03:17.399
<v Speaker 3>So don't worry Portland, we will be out there.

0:03:17.240 --> 0:03:18.360
<v Speaker 1>Maybe maybe the Cove.

0:03:19.240 --> 0:03:21.800
<v Speaker 3>That's what that's the talk, that's the chatter around town.

0:03:21.960 --> 0:03:24.680
<v Speaker 2>But we have no dates confirmed yet. But this just

0:03:24.720 --> 0:03:27.200
<v Speaker 2>look for us again in the Pacific Northwest at the

0:03:27.200 --> 0:03:27.919
<v Speaker 2>beginning of the year.

0:03:28.200 --> 0:03:29.680
<v Speaker 3>That's a much better way to put it.

0:03:29.800 --> 0:03:32.680
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, So, do you want to talk about subpoenas You

0:03:32.680 --> 0:03:34.160
<v Speaker 4>got any other housekeeping to do?

0:03:34.400 --> 0:03:37.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't think so. Subpoenas weird spelling.

0:03:39.000 --> 0:03:42.080
<v Speaker 4>Well, yeah, so I looked up the word subpoena is

0:03:42.080 --> 0:03:46.560
<v Speaker 4>actually two words. It means under penalty, and it's typically

0:03:46.600 --> 0:03:49.560
<v Speaker 4>the first two words that were read in this rid

0:03:49.600 --> 0:03:53.240
<v Speaker 4>of subpoena, basically saying under penalty.

0:03:53.480 --> 0:03:56.520
<v Speaker 1>Of blah blah blah.

0:03:56.640 --> 0:03:56.839
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:03:56.840 --> 0:03:58.600
<v Speaker 4>I was thinking all I could think about is really

0:03:58.600 --> 0:04:00.000
<v Speaker 4>dirty but dark stuff.

0:04:00.160 --> 0:04:01.840
<v Speaker 3>Oh yeah, yeah, so I just.

0:04:02.480 --> 0:04:05.600
<v Speaker 4>Let you fill in the blah blah blah. But anyway,

0:04:05.680 --> 0:04:08.920
<v Speaker 4>under penalty of whatever, you need to do one of

0:04:09.040 --> 0:04:12.720
<v Speaker 4>two things. And there are two types of subpoenas that

0:04:12.800 --> 0:04:14.920
<v Speaker 4>everybody you know, everybody hears subpoena and you think, like

0:04:15.000 --> 0:04:18.400
<v Speaker 4>Law and Order, Maybe visions of Central Park run through

0:04:18.400 --> 0:04:21.200
<v Speaker 4>your head because that's your only exposure to Central Park

0:04:21.279 --> 0:04:22.120
<v Speaker 4>is from Law and Order.

0:04:22.240 --> 0:04:25.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, or you think of the US government because a

0:04:25.920 --> 0:04:27.920
<v Speaker 2>lot of this is going to be about congressional subpoenas

0:04:27.920 --> 0:04:29.680
<v Speaker 2>because that's really the juiciest subpoena.

0:04:29.760 --> 0:04:32.760
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, that's It's not like it's new that Congress has

0:04:32.880 --> 0:04:36.560
<v Speaker 4>just recently started issuing subpoenas. It's new in the conscious

0:04:36.600 --> 0:04:39.920
<v Speaker 4>of America in this age, this generation.

0:04:40.040 --> 0:04:41.440
<v Speaker 3>I mean, it's been going on for a while.

0:04:41.480 --> 0:04:46.080
<v Speaker 4>But normally when people think subpoenas, until like basically twenty seventeen,

0:04:46.200 --> 0:04:52.080
<v Speaker 4>sixteen eighteen, not necessarily in that order, most people thought

0:04:52.120 --> 0:04:54.880
<v Speaker 4>of courtroom subpoenas, and that is, you know, typically the

0:04:55.160 --> 0:04:57.520
<v Speaker 4>subpoena most people are ever going to come up against

0:04:57.560 --> 0:04:58.359
<v Speaker 4>in their lifetime.

0:04:58.920 --> 0:04:59.320
<v Speaker 1>That's right.

0:04:59.680 --> 0:05:02.760
<v Speaker 2>But you mentioned the two types. Do you want to

0:05:02.839 --> 0:05:04.960
<v Speaker 2>break out your Latin or shall.

0:05:04.680 --> 0:05:07.520
<v Speaker 3>I you take the first, I'll take the second.

0:05:07.680 --> 0:05:09.960
<v Speaker 1>Oh okay, the first one's easy.

0:05:10.760 --> 0:05:14.440
<v Speaker 2>The first one is subpoena add testify candem.

0:05:15.360 --> 0:05:17.960
<v Speaker 4>Wow did you see that? You just made a mouse

0:05:17.960 --> 0:05:21.680
<v Speaker 4>appear and run out of the room. The next one

0:05:21.800 --> 0:05:24.480
<v Speaker 4>so so sorry. The first one, the one you just said.

0:05:24.800 --> 0:05:25.960
<v Speaker 1>That means you got to come to court.

0:05:26.279 --> 0:05:27.039
<v Speaker 3>You just nailed it.

0:05:27.120 --> 0:05:29.280
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, it says that you have to come and testify,

0:05:30.080 --> 0:05:33.560
<v Speaker 4>and you might not be a party to the lawsuit

0:05:33.640 --> 0:05:35.680
<v Speaker 4>like this is. It can be a civil case or

0:05:35.680 --> 0:05:37.720
<v Speaker 4>a criminal case, that's a big thing to point out,

0:05:39.160 --> 0:05:42.640
<v Speaker 4>but basically it's saying, you have some information. You witnessed

0:05:42.680 --> 0:05:49.040
<v Speaker 4>an act, you overheard a conversation, the defendant confessed something

0:05:49.040 --> 0:05:50.840
<v Speaker 4>to you. We need you to come to court and

0:05:50.920 --> 0:05:54.320
<v Speaker 4>tell your story. And that's what that first subpoena is

0:05:54.320 --> 0:05:54.920
<v Speaker 4>saying to do.

0:05:55.120 --> 0:05:57.359
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and not necessarily court court, but it can be

0:05:57.400 --> 0:05:58.640
<v Speaker 2>any kind of legal authority.

0:05:58.839 --> 0:06:01.839
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, it could be a deposition, it could be an arbitration,

0:06:02.920 --> 0:06:06.680
<v Speaker 4>but typically it's the authority of a court of law

0:06:07.160 --> 0:06:10.280
<v Speaker 4>to basically say we're going to levy a fine against you,

0:06:10.560 --> 0:06:12.040
<v Speaker 4>or we're going to arrest you and put you in

0:06:12.120 --> 0:06:16.320
<v Speaker 4>jail if you don't listen. That's that's used to kind

0:06:16.320 --> 0:06:20.280
<v Speaker 4>of enforce subpoenas. So the second one is the subpoena

0:06:20.520 --> 0:06:26.080
<v Speaker 4>douces teakum, Hey nice, thank you, and that is basically saying, hey,

0:06:26.400 --> 0:06:29.800
<v Speaker 4>you have a document, you have a hair sample, you

0:06:29.960 --> 0:06:32.400
<v Speaker 4>have some sort of bodily fluids we want to get

0:06:32.400 --> 0:06:33.080
<v Speaker 4>our hands on.

0:06:33.600 --> 0:06:34.960
<v Speaker 3>You have a computer.

0:06:36.560 --> 0:06:41.680
<v Speaker 4>Or a computer hard drive, you know, something like that

0:06:41.680 --> 0:06:44.360
<v Speaker 4>that we want you to produce because we want to

0:06:44.440 --> 0:06:47.440
<v Speaker 4>use it as evidence. And there's a really important point

0:06:47.520 --> 0:06:51.080
<v Speaker 4>to put here, Like a court is saying, a court

0:06:51.200 --> 0:06:54.240
<v Speaker 4>or an official of the court or of the government

0:06:54.320 --> 0:06:57.200
<v Speaker 4>is saying, we want you to do this because we

0:06:57.200 --> 0:06:59.679
<v Speaker 4>have this lawsuit going on and you have something we need.

0:07:00.320 --> 0:07:02.400
<v Speaker 4>But it's not necessarily the judge saying, and the judge

0:07:02.440 --> 0:07:05.280
<v Speaker 4>is signing off on it. It's really a lawyer or

0:07:05.640 --> 0:07:07.760
<v Speaker 4>for one side or the other saying, Hey, I heard

0:07:07.760 --> 0:07:10.680
<v Speaker 4>that this person has this secret tape and I need

0:07:10.720 --> 0:07:12.560
<v Speaker 4>to get my hands on it. Judge, can you order

0:07:12.600 --> 0:07:14.840
<v Speaker 4>this person to bring it to me so that I

0:07:14.880 --> 0:07:16.120
<v Speaker 4>can enter it into evidence.

0:07:16.400 --> 0:07:19.040
<v Speaker 2>And then the judge says, speak to my clerk, and

0:07:19.080 --> 0:07:21.480
<v Speaker 2>then the clerk of the usually the clerk of the

0:07:21.520 --> 0:07:22.160
<v Speaker 2>judge who's.

0:07:22.000 --> 0:07:25.680
<v Speaker 3>Handling that case, they say, talk to the hand.

0:07:25.960 --> 0:07:30.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and they'll generally issue it on on like official

0:07:30.240 --> 0:07:34.040
<v Speaker 2>court letterhead and official documentation. It's not like the judge

0:07:34.080 --> 0:07:36.000
<v Speaker 2>is washing their hands of it necessarily.

0:07:36.760 --> 0:07:40.000
<v Speaker 4>No, No, I'm sure like if they do something egregiously wrong,

0:07:40.040 --> 0:07:42.320
<v Speaker 4>the judge is going to hear about it and punish them.

0:07:42.400 --> 0:07:47.120
<v Speaker 1>That's right. And then it served usually in person kind

0:07:47.120 --> 0:07:48.840
<v Speaker 1>of you know, handed to you like on the TV

0:07:48.880 --> 0:07:49.880
<v Speaker 1>shows and in the movies.

0:07:50.320 --> 0:07:53.360
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, either by a sheriff's deputy or a process server.

0:07:54.360 --> 0:07:55.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, but not always.

0:07:55.560 --> 0:08:00.640
<v Speaker 2>It depends on if it's congressional or if it's you know,

0:08:00.880 --> 0:08:03.280
<v Speaker 2>civil regular Joshmo stuff.

0:08:04.440 --> 0:08:05.720
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. Well, yeah for sure.

0:08:05.760 --> 0:08:08.480
<v Speaker 4>But I think even if it is regular civil joshmost stuff,

0:08:08.520 --> 0:08:12.880
<v Speaker 4>you can still go higher the sheriff's department to serve papers.

0:08:13.200 --> 0:08:14.640
<v Speaker 3>To serve a subpoena, oh for sure.

0:08:14.680 --> 0:08:17.800
<v Speaker 1>I think the congressional ones are not served by a shriff.

0:08:17.880 --> 0:08:19.240
<v Speaker 3>Oh, I see, who do they use?

0:08:19.960 --> 0:08:21.320
<v Speaker 1>I think it depends it could.

0:08:21.880 --> 0:08:25.600
<v Speaker 2>I mean the way congressional subpoena's work is all sort

0:08:25.600 --> 0:08:28.720
<v Speaker 2>of dependent on the individual committee that's seeking that subpoena.

0:08:29.280 --> 0:08:32.640
<v Speaker 2>So they all have their own individual rules about like

0:08:32.679 --> 0:08:35.040
<v Speaker 2>whether you need a majority vote to even get a subpoena,

0:08:35.120 --> 0:08:38.480
<v Speaker 2>or whether the chair of that committee is, you know,

0:08:38.600 --> 0:08:42.680
<v Speaker 2>has the power to grant or request a subpoena.

0:08:43.040 --> 0:08:44.880
<v Speaker 4>Right, I've read some of them know that it's a

0:08:44.920 --> 0:08:48.319
<v Speaker 4>real downer to get a subpoena. Say, some congressional committees

0:08:48.800 --> 0:08:53.160
<v Speaker 4>use that mascot from the nineteen eighty four Olympics, the Eagle,

0:08:53.320 --> 0:08:54.480
<v Speaker 4>to come issue your.

0:08:54.400 --> 0:08:55.400
<v Speaker 3>Papers to you.

0:08:56.040 --> 0:08:57.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't remember that one.

0:08:57.080 --> 0:08:58.200
<v Speaker 3>You don't remember that eagle.

0:08:58.640 --> 0:09:02.160
<v Speaker 4>Now it's like a cartoon eagle from nineteen eighty four.

0:09:02.520 --> 0:09:03.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean all I can.

0:09:03.920 --> 0:09:06.719
<v Speaker 2>I can't get past the Atlanta Olympics mascot. That's why

0:09:06.720 --> 0:09:08.160
<v Speaker 2>I can't get back to nineteen eighty four?

0:09:08.440 --> 0:09:09.760
<v Speaker 3>Was it? What's it? Or who's it?

0:09:09.920 --> 0:09:10.839
<v Speaker 1>Oh? I don't even know.

0:09:11.559 --> 0:09:13.720
<v Speaker 3>It was one of those too. What was that thing?

0:09:14.040 --> 0:09:14.679
<v Speaker 1>I don't know.

0:09:15.200 --> 0:09:17.200
<v Speaker 3>It was a last last minute thing.

0:09:17.320 --> 0:09:18.720
<v Speaker 1>What was the name it was?

0:09:18.760 --> 0:09:20.160
<v Speaker 3>What's it? Or who's it? Was it?

0:09:20.440 --> 0:09:20.680
<v Speaker 1>Yes?

0:09:22.240 --> 0:09:24.240
<v Speaker 2>Yes, man, it was bad. I was out of town.

0:09:24.480 --> 0:09:24.960
<v Speaker 2>I fled.

0:09:25.320 --> 0:09:26.319
<v Speaker 3>You didn't miss anything.

0:09:26.920 --> 0:09:31.679
<v Speaker 2>But I do remember watching the opening whatever they're called,

0:09:31.679 --> 0:09:36.720
<v Speaker 2>the opening ceremonies, Opening ceremonies, right, and seeing the stainless

0:09:36.720 --> 0:09:39.880
<v Speaker 2>steel pickup trucks driving around and just thinking, oh boy.

0:09:40.800 --> 0:09:41.040
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:09:41.040 --> 0:09:42.840
<v Speaker 4>And for those of you who are like, they've talked

0:09:42.840 --> 0:09:45.040
<v Speaker 4>about this before, we have. Yeah, we have, and we're

0:09:45.080 --> 0:09:46.200
<v Speaker 4>still that upset about it.

0:09:46.280 --> 0:09:48.120
<v Speaker 1>We'll talk about it again in five more years.

0:09:48.360 --> 0:09:49.320
<v Speaker 3>We haven't forgotten.

0:09:49.520 --> 0:09:51.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, stainless steel pickup trucks. They haunt me. I have

0:09:51.840 --> 0:09:53.120
<v Speaker 1>dreams about those trucks.

0:09:53.559 --> 0:09:57.520
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, they're just circling you, playing striper at the loudest

0:09:57.559 --> 0:10:03.040
<v Speaker 4>possible volume. Oh man, Okay, So we've got different kinds

0:10:03.040 --> 0:10:05.520
<v Speaker 4>of subpoenas, but both of them apply to either courts

0:10:05.520 --> 0:10:10.320
<v Speaker 4>of law or Congress. So there's one big question that

0:10:10.360 --> 0:10:13.760
<v Speaker 4>most people who get a subpoena ask themselves the moment

0:10:13.800 --> 0:10:17.400
<v Speaker 4>they're served the paper, and that is, can I ignore

0:10:17.440 --> 0:10:17.800
<v Speaker 4>this thing?

0:10:18.240 --> 0:10:19.640
<v Speaker 3>Do I have to do this right?

0:10:20.520 --> 0:10:22.600
<v Speaker 4>What happens to me if I just pretend like I

0:10:22.679 --> 0:10:24.320
<v Speaker 4>never got this? And that's really tough to do. I

0:10:24.360 --> 0:10:29.800
<v Speaker 4>was reading about process servers and the people who are

0:10:29.880 --> 0:10:32.400
<v Speaker 4>issuing the subpoena or the lawyer who's asking for the

0:10:32.440 --> 0:10:34.560
<v Speaker 4>subpoena to say, they want some sort of proof that

0:10:34.600 --> 0:10:38.600
<v Speaker 4>says you got that paper, so they have to. There's

0:10:38.640 --> 0:10:42.520
<v Speaker 4>like certain rules and regulations to serving somebody with a subpoena,

0:10:42.600 --> 0:10:46.520
<v Speaker 4>so it's really difficult to pretend like you're not, like

0:10:46.559 --> 0:10:49.000
<v Speaker 4>you didn't get it, and a lot of people actually

0:10:49.040 --> 0:10:51.480
<v Speaker 4>go to a tremendous amount of trouble to avoid being

0:10:51.520 --> 0:10:54.600
<v Speaker 4>served a subpoena. They will like move around, they will

0:10:54.600 --> 0:10:57.600
<v Speaker 4>pretend they're not home, they won't let anyone else answer

0:10:57.720 --> 0:10:59.600
<v Speaker 4>the door because in some states you can leave it

0:10:59.640 --> 0:11:02.200
<v Speaker 4>with a competent thirteen year old or eighteen year old.

0:11:02.280 --> 0:11:03.920
<v Speaker 1>They'll stick their hands in their ears and go.

0:11:03.920 --> 0:11:05.080
<v Speaker 3>La la la la la la.

0:11:05.160 --> 0:11:07.679
<v Speaker 4>Right, exactly, they'll do a lot of stuff to keep

0:11:07.720 --> 0:11:10.640
<v Speaker 4>from being served, but that's actually it will.

0:11:10.480 --> 0:11:12.040
<v Speaker 3>Just delay being served.

0:11:12.200 --> 0:11:15.880
<v Speaker 4>In the long run, you will still there's other remedies

0:11:15.880 --> 0:11:18.440
<v Speaker 4>they can use. They can mail it to your house

0:11:18.480 --> 0:11:21.800
<v Speaker 4>certified mail. And if the male person says this was

0:11:21.880 --> 0:11:24.800
<v Speaker 4>dropped off, it made it to their house, that's enough.

0:11:25.280 --> 0:11:27.199
<v Speaker 4>Or if you can say I took the numbers off

0:11:27.200 --> 0:11:29.040
<v Speaker 4>my mailbox, what are you going to do now, chump.

0:11:29.880 --> 0:11:33.640
<v Speaker 4>They can actually post an ad in the local legal

0:11:33.760 --> 0:11:38.280
<v Speaker 4>organ the newspaper, and then that will be considered serving you.

0:11:38.520 --> 0:11:42.120
<v Speaker 4>So either way, you're going to end up being considered

0:11:42.120 --> 0:11:44.920
<v Speaker 4>to have received the subpoena eventually, and if you do,

0:11:45.080 --> 0:11:46.880
<v Speaker 4>you probably shouldn't ignore it.

0:11:47.600 --> 0:11:50.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean it says here in this article, which

0:11:51.280 --> 0:11:53.000
<v Speaker 2>most of this is from the House Stuff Works article

0:11:53.040 --> 0:11:55.719
<v Speaker 2>about saboenas, but it says, you know, it's a lot

0:11:55.760 --> 0:11:59.000
<v Speaker 2>easier if you just go right or produce the documents.

0:11:59.440 --> 0:12:02.199
<v Speaker 2>But we'll cover here in a lot of this congressional

0:12:02.200 --> 0:12:05.280
<v Speaker 2>oversight stuff that is not the route that people take

0:12:05.760 --> 0:12:07.120
<v Speaker 2>generally in government.

0:12:07.559 --> 0:12:09.440
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, and I thought it was kind of an oversight

0:12:09.520 --> 0:12:11.880
<v Speaker 4>to not say like, but also if somebody serves you

0:12:11.960 --> 0:12:14.959
<v Speaker 4>with a subpoena, like go, you don't necessarily have to

0:12:15.040 --> 0:12:17.280
<v Speaker 4>hire a lawyer, but at least consult with one, like

0:12:17.360 --> 0:12:19.960
<v Speaker 4>get some legal advice, say this is what I got.

0:12:20.040 --> 0:12:21.920
<v Speaker 4>You know, what should I do with this?

0:12:22.520 --> 0:12:22.760
<v Speaker 3>Is this?

0:12:22.960 --> 0:12:25.720
<v Speaker 4>You know, you know, there's a lot of questions that

0:12:25.800 --> 0:12:29.000
<v Speaker 4>you should have answered before you just act on a subpoena.

0:12:29.720 --> 0:12:32.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and you know, when it comes to ignoring subpoenas,

0:12:33.160 --> 0:12:33.960
<v Speaker 2>and that's what a lot.

0:12:33.920 --> 0:12:34.640
<v Speaker 1>Of this will be about.

0:12:34.760 --> 0:12:38.679
<v Speaker 2>Is what's going on with our government right now and

0:12:38.800 --> 0:12:42.840
<v Speaker 2>previously and what happens if you defy Congress And is

0:12:42.880 --> 0:12:45.600
<v Speaker 2>there any accountability for that or can you just sit

0:12:45.600 --> 0:12:47.199
<v Speaker 2>on your hands say nope.

0:12:47.640 --> 0:12:49.000
<v Speaker 1>But there have been some very.

0:12:48.840 --> 0:12:54.120
<v Speaker 2>Famous cases in the past, you know, fifteen years or

0:12:54.120 --> 0:12:58.240
<v Speaker 2>so where subpoenas have been ignored, starting well, not starting

0:12:58.240 --> 0:13:01.640
<v Speaker 2>with but we can start with Eric Holder, Attorney General

0:13:01.679 --> 0:13:02.600
<v Speaker 2>for Barack Obama.

0:13:03.559 --> 0:13:04.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that was a big one.

0:13:04.840 --> 0:13:09.080
<v Speaker 2>That was part of the Operation the Fast and Furious

0:13:09.120 --> 0:13:10.480
<v Speaker 2>scandal scandal.

0:13:10.840 --> 0:13:15.320
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, it was definitely a scandal. From what I remember,

0:13:15.360 --> 0:13:18.200
<v Speaker 4>it involved like secret gun sales or else. Some guns

0:13:18.200 --> 0:13:21.839
<v Speaker 4>were led out into the community to be traced to

0:13:21.840 --> 0:13:23.760
<v Speaker 4>see who they went. To and one of them ended

0:13:23.800 --> 0:13:27.319
<v Speaker 4>up being used to murder an ice officer, I believe well.

0:13:27.360 --> 0:13:31.720
<v Speaker 2>Attorney General Eric Holder refused, under direction of Obama, to

0:13:33.120 --> 0:13:36.520
<v Speaker 2>answer that subpoena, and he became the first sitting cabinet

0:13:36.559 --> 0:13:39.440
<v Speaker 2>member to be voted in contempt of Congress.

0:13:39.720 --> 0:13:40.400
<v Speaker 3>Oh was that right?

0:13:41.000 --> 0:13:41.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah?

0:13:41.520 --> 0:13:44.400
<v Speaker 2>And you know you're like, oh, what happens in well,

0:13:44.480 --> 0:13:48.480
<v Speaker 2>three and a half years later a judge ruled that

0:13:48.520 --> 0:13:52.720
<v Speaker 2>he did not have the right to defy Congress, and

0:13:52.760 --> 0:13:54.480
<v Speaker 2>by that time there was a new Congress, and it

0:13:54.520 --> 0:13:55.199
<v Speaker 2>was a mood point.

0:13:56.040 --> 0:13:58.960
<v Speaker 4>That's a really big big thing to remember. Is like

0:13:59.480 --> 0:14:03.640
<v Speaker 4>an eempt of Congress vote where you are supposedly in

0:14:03.679 --> 0:14:07.040
<v Speaker 4>trouble for ignoring a subpoena, only lasts as long as

0:14:07.080 --> 0:14:08.680
<v Speaker 4>that session of Congress.

0:14:08.600 --> 0:14:11.160
<v Speaker 1>Unless the next session of Congress wants to pick it up.

0:14:11.440 --> 0:14:13.440
<v Speaker 4>Yes, but then they have to hold another vote. And

0:14:13.520 --> 0:14:17.240
<v Speaker 4>the chances that that the that there has been a

0:14:17.360 --> 0:14:20.640
<v Speaker 4>change in leadership potentially in that Congress is you know,

0:14:20.760 --> 0:14:23.720
<v Speaker 4>high enough that if you if you make it through

0:14:23.760 --> 0:14:28.240
<v Speaker 4>that Congress, you know going into recess, you you're probably

0:14:28.280 --> 0:14:30.640
<v Speaker 4>going to get away with it. And I mean that's

0:14:30.680 --> 0:14:32.560
<v Speaker 4>par for the course. It wasn't just Eric Holder who

0:14:32.600 --> 0:14:35.440
<v Speaker 4>got away with it. Harriet Myers, who was a White

0:14:35.440 --> 0:14:36.880
<v Speaker 4>House counsel to George W.

0:14:37.000 --> 0:14:37.520
<v Speaker 3>Bush.

0:14:37.800 --> 0:14:42.040
<v Speaker 4>There was like a mass political firing of US attorneys.

0:14:42.200 --> 0:14:44.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and two thousand and eight yep.

0:14:44.840 --> 0:14:47.280
<v Speaker 4>And she and I think chief of staff at the time,

0:14:47.400 --> 0:14:51.720
<v Speaker 4>Joshua Bolton, were both held in contempt of Congress. And man,

0:14:51.760 --> 0:14:54.680
<v Speaker 4>if you look up, like you know, follow up reporting

0:14:54.720 --> 0:14:57.280
<v Speaker 4>on this stuff, it's like, you know, while it's going on,

0:14:57.320 --> 0:15:01.120
<v Speaker 4>they're like they could face fines, jail time. Finally I

0:15:01.160 --> 0:15:04.160
<v Speaker 4>found some follow up as like nothing nothing happened, Absolutely

0:15:04.160 --> 0:15:06.840
<v Speaker 4>nothing happened. There was no legal ramifications, there were no

0:15:06.920 --> 0:15:13.040
<v Speaker 4>personal ramifications. There was nothing happened whatsoever to Harriet Myers

0:15:13.320 --> 0:15:17.080
<v Speaker 4>or Joshua Bolton or Eric Holder for just saying Congress,

0:15:17.520 --> 0:15:22.000
<v Speaker 4>the United States Congress, go sit on it, yeah, which

0:15:22.040 --> 0:15:25.200
<v Speaker 4>is essentially what you're saying when you ignore a subpoenas yeah.

0:15:25.240 --> 0:15:30.240
<v Speaker 2>And because of this, you remember Representative darryl Isa probably

0:15:30.280 --> 0:15:34.760
<v Speaker 2>by name. He was involved in trying to get Eric Holder,

0:15:35.000 --> 0:15:38.000
<v Speaker 2>you know, in the room, and he was so mad

0:15:38.560 --> 0:15:42.960
<v Speaker 2>he sponsored or intro to bill to strengthen subpoena enforcement power,

0:15:43.720 --> 0:15:47.360
<v Speaker 2>and it died in the Senate, and before we I

0:15:47.360 --> 0:15:48.360
<v Speaker 2>think we're about to take a break.

0:15:48.400 --> 0:15:49.760
<v Speaker 1>Before we do that, though, we should.

0:15:49.520 --> 0:15:54.400
<v Speaker 2>Mention that currently White House Counsel Don McGann has refused

0:15:54.400 --> 0:15:59.600
<v Speaker 2>to testify or refused to answer his subpoena under direct

0:15:59.680 --> 0:16:04.480
<v Speaker 2>order of Trump, and right now he's being sued by

0:16:04.520 --> 0:16:06.520
<v Speaker 2>the House right of August.

0:16:06.720 --> 0:16:12.040
<v Speaker 4>And he in particular provides an unusual situation because at

0:16:12.120 --> 0:16:14.560
<v Speaker 4>least with Harriet Myers, or with Joshua Bolton, or with

0:16:14.720 --> 0:16:17.760
<v Speaker 4>Eric Holder, when they were directed by the President at

0:16:17.800 --> 0:16:22.440
<v Speaker 4>the time not to submit to that subpoena from Congress,

0:16:22.720 --> 0:16:26.040
<v Speaker 4>they were part of the president's staff. Don McGann was

0:16:26.200 --> 0:16:30.560
<v Speaker 4>instructed not to not to cooperate with the subpoena after

0:16:30.640 --> 0:16:33.480
<v Speaker 4>he had already left civil service. He was no longer

0:16:33.480 --> 0:16:36.200
<v Speaker 4>part of the executive branch. So that definitely makes it unusual.

0:16:36.480 --> 0:16:38.480
<v Speaker 4>But if you're sitting there and your head is popping

0:16:38.520 --> 0:16:41.400
<v Speaker 4>and you're saying, how wait, how this is Congress. How

0:16:41.400 --> 0:16:44.680
<v Speaker 4>can a president just say just ignore that subpoena and

0:16:44.680 --> 0:16:47.840
<v Speaker 4>people get away with it. There's actually a lot of

0:16:49.080 --> 0:16:51.640
<v Speaker 4>case law that's been built over the centuries that kind

0:16:51.640 --> 0:16:54.320
<v Speaker 4>of establishes that. And I say, Chuck, we take a break,

0:16:54.360 --> 0:16:57.200
<v Speaker 4>and then we'll dive into that after this case.

0:16:57.280 --> 0:17:30.840
<v Speaker 5>Law Josh.

0:17:19.840 --> 0:17:22.439
<v Speaker 4>So Chuck, there's something about subpoenas, whether they're issued by

0:17:22.520 --> 0:17:26.280
<v Speaker 4>Congress or by a court of law, when you get

0:17:26.280 --> 0:17:31.640
<v Speaker 4>them that a lot of people don't realize they're negotiable. Yeah,

0:17:31.760 --> 0:17:34.520
<v Speaker 4>that's one really big reason to hire a lawyer is

0:17:34.560 --> 0:17:38.960
<v Speaker 4>because they it may be overly broad, it may be

0:17:39.080 --> 0:17:41.760
<v Speaker 4>kind of a phishing expedition. It may put you at

0:17:41.840 --> 0:17:44.479
<v Speaker 4>risk to come forward and give this testimony or to

0:17:44.520 --> 0:17:47.320
<v Speaker 4>hand over these documents. And if you hire a lawyer

0:17:47.320 --> 0:17:49.480
<v Speaker 4>and say, hey, these are the things I'm worried about,

0:17:49.640 --> 0:17:52.120
<v Speaker 4>they can go and argue to the judge like, hey,

0:17:52.320 --> 0:17:55.040
<v Speaker 4>how about we just limit this subpoena to these documents

0:17:55.119 --> 0:17:58.600
<v Speaker 4>rather than everything on my client's hard drive. Or it's

0:17:58.800 --> 0:18:01.360
<v Speaker 4>really a big hardship for my client to make it here,

0:18:02.400 --> 0:18:05.680
<v Speaker 4>and the fifteen dollars a day that the court's paying

0:18:05.720 --> 0:18:09.080
<v Speaker 4>him for coming to testify isn't actually going to cover it, So,

0:18:09.400 --> 0:18:12.520
<v Speaker 4>you know, can we negotiate a higher fee or something

0:18:12.560 --> 0:18:14.680
<v Speaker 4>like that. There's a lot of stuff that can be done,

0:18:14.840 --> 0:18:19.160
<v Speaker 4>but this is a tactic that's also used with congressional subpoenas. Too,

0:18:19.440 --> 0:18:23.280
<v Speaker 4>where say, like the executive branch will go, I think

0:18:23.280 --> 0:18:25.320
<v Speaker 4>that this is a little overly broad, but maybe we

0:18:25.359 --> 0:18:26.520
<v Speaker 4>could give you this document.

0:18:26.560 --> 0:18:27.560
<v Speaker 3>Will that satisfy you?

0:18:27.840 --> 0:18:28.920
<v Speaker 1>And then I go nope.

0:18:29.359 --> 0:18:32.240
<v Speaker 4>Sometimes I say yes, though, and part of that negotiation

0:18:32.400 --> 0:18:35.840
<v Speaker 4>comes out of this subpoena process. It's a response to it.

0:18:36.600 --> 0:18:39.920
<v Speaker 4>But none of it would have any effect whatsoever if

0:18:39.960 --> 0:18:46.120
<v Speaker 4>Congress didn't have any redress for enforcing its subpoenas. If

0:18:46.160 --> 0:18:47.199
<v Speaker 4>somebody ignores it.

0:18:47.640 --> 0:18:50.359
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, technically there are fines in jail time

0:18:50.480 --> 0:18:53.600
<v Speaker 2>sort of looming. But the more I read about this stuff,

0:18:53.680 --> 0:18:57.240
<v Speaker 2>especially when it comes to Congressional oversight, the more it

0:18:57.280 --> 0:19:00.840
<v Speaker 2>became clear that none of that stuff really happens. It's

0:19:00.880 --> 0:19:05.120
<v Speaker 2>all just dangled out there as a means to negotiate

0:19:06.320 --> 0:19:09.639
<v Speaker 2>something with each other over a pretty long period of

0:19:09.640 --> 0:19:11.120
<v Speaker 2>time usually for sure.

0:19:11.200 --> 0:19:13.480
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, that Eric Holder thing was it was like four

0:19:13.560 --> 0:19:17.040
<v Speaker 4>years before he finally handed over the file, and I

0:19:17.080 --> 0:19:19.560
<v Speaker 4>think Congress had already gone out a session, you said,

0:19:19.600 --> 0:19:22.000
<v Speaker 4>And it was basically just the whole thing had died down,

0:19:22.000 --> 0:19:26.000
<v Speaker 4>which I think is basically the stalling tactic that people

0:19:26.680 --> 0:19:29.120
<v Speaker 4>ignore subpoenas for like that's why they're doing it.

0:19:29.359 --> 0:19:29.719
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:19:29.840 --> 0:19:32.919
<v Speaker 2>So technically, if you defy Congress, the committee that issued

0:19:32.960 --> 0:19:37.000
<v Speaker 2>that subpoena is going to vote to issue a citation,

0:19:37.240 --> 0:19:39.560
<v Speaker 2>a contempt citation, and then it's got to go to

0:19:39.640 --> 0:19:42.159
<v Speaker 2>the full chamber to vote on it. And if that

0:19:42.200 --> 0:19:45.000
<v Speaker 2>goes through and it passes, which it has before, then

0:19:45.080 --> 0:19:48.600
<v Speaker 2>there are three basic ways that you can prosecute that.

0:19:48.640 --> 0:19:55.240
<v Speaker 4>Charge, right, and each one is worthless. Yeah, pretty much

0:19:55.840 --> 0:19:58.959
<v Speaker 4>like this is. We would never give official legal advice.

0:19:59.400 --> 0:20:02.160
<v Speaker 4>First of all, we're not lawyers or even trained as lawyers.

0:20:02.640 --> 0:20:05.520
<v Speaker 4>But from what I can tell, there's just nothing happens

0:20:05.560 --> 0:20:08.640
<v Speaker 4>to you if you ignore a congressional subpoena. But most

0:20:08.640 --> 0:20:11.879
<v Speaker 4>people respond to it because I feel like the further

0:20:12.080 --> 0:20:16.840
<v Speaker 4>down the food chain you are, the more likely Congress

0:20:17.000 --> 0:20:19.680
<v Speaker 4>is to do something in retaliation to you.

0:20:20.560 --> 0:20:23.879
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, well, let's go through the three at least fine,

0:20:24.240 --> 0:20:29.119
<v Speaker 2>if for no other reason than pure folly. So if

0:20:29.160 --> 0:20:33.600
<v Speaker 2>they vote and that contempt citation goes through, it is

0:20:33.640 --> 0:20:37.240
<v Speaker 2>then under the control of the executive branch. And you think,

0:20:37.240 --> 0:20:40.680
<v Speaker 2>oh great the president or oh great the president, it's

0:20:40.680 --> 0:20:43.040
<v Speaker 2>really neither. It is the Justice Department, which is part

0:20:43.080 --> 0:20:45.760
<v Speaker 2>of the executive branch. It's up to them. To decide

0:20:45.800 --> 0:20:49.720
<v Speaker 2>whether or not they're going to prosecute criminally, and they're

0:20:49.760 --> 0:20:52.520
<v Speaker 2>going to say no. They're going to say and we'll

0:20:52.520 --> 0:20:54.760
<v Speaker 2>talk a lot about executive privilege coming up, but they'll

0:20:54.840 --> 0:20:59.320
<v Speaker 2>usually cite that and decline to prosecute, basically kind of saying,

0:21:00.040 --> 0:21:01.719
<v Speaker 2>you know what, we don't get involved in this stuff.

0:21:02.119 --> 0:21:02.320
<v Speaker 3>Right.

0:21:02.400 --> 0:21:07.240
<v Speaker 4>So that is specifically when it comes to subpoenaing something

0:21:07.640 --> 0:21:10.720
<v Speaker 4>from the White House correct or the executive bridge. Now,

0:21:10.720 --> 0:21:14.560
<v Speaker 4>if Congress is being ignored by, say like the owner

0:21:14.560 --> 0:21:17.720
<v Speaker 4>of the Houston Astros, they can go to the DOJ

0:21:17.920 --> 0:21:20.879
<v Speaker 4>and say, hey, the Houston Astros baseball team owner is

0:21:20.960 --> 0:21:23.840
<v Speaker 4>ignoring a subpoena. We want you to go after the guy,

0:21:24.280 --> 0:21:27.320
<v Speaker 4>and they'll go after the guy. It's when it's executive

0:21:27.480 --> 0:21:30.640
<v Speaker 4>privilege that's being cited that the DOJ says, you know how,

0:21:30.640 --> 0:21:33.639
<v Speaker 4>it's our jurisdiction to decide whether to prosecute this stuff.

0:21:33.760 --> 0:21:36.320
<v Speaker 4>We're going to decline to do that because it's our

0:21:36.359 --> 0:21:38.439
<v Speaker 4>own people, and we're just going to consider this an

0:21:38.480 --> 0:21:39.760
<v Speaker 4>internal executive branch.

0:21:39.840 --> 0:21:46.480
<v Speaker 2>Matter Number two is the civil judgment, right, and that's

0:21:46.520 --> 0:21:49.439
<v Speaker 2>when you need the courts to basically enforce this. Go

0:21:49.480 --> 0:21:52.679
<v Speaker 2>into court and saying we need your help to enforce

0:21:52.760 --> 0:21:55.199
<v Speaker 2>this civil suit against somebody who's stiffed us.

0:21:55.680 --> 0:21:57.919
<v Speaker 4>Right, Like, you know how you can go arrest somebody

0:21:57.960 --> 0:21:59.520
<v Speaker 4>and put him in jail? Can you do that on

0:21:59.560 --> 0:22:00.720
<v Speaker 4>our behalf? Basically?

0:22:00.960 --> 0:22:04.879
<v Speaker 1>But this is super slow, like turtle like slow.

0:22:05.359 --> 0:22:05.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:22:05.640 --> 0:22:10.200
<v Speaker 4>But I think the idea is that the thought that

0:22:10.400 --> 0:22:13.600
<v Speaker 4>maybe somewhere a couple of years down the line, there's

0:22:13.640 --> 0:22:15.600
<v Speaker 4>going to be a judgment against you where you're going

0:22:15.640 --> 0:22:18.280
<v Speaker 4>to have to pay one hundred thousand dollars to Congress

0:22:18.359 --> 0:22:20.800
<v Speaker 4>or something like that, or spend like twelve months in

0:22:20.920 --> 0:22:25.760
<v Speaker 4>jail will get you to the table to negotiate you know,

0:22:25.840 --> 0:22:28.840
<v Speaker 4>what documents they actually want or what testimony they want.

0:22:28.920 --> 0:22:31.919
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's just leverage, right. So the third one is

0:22:31.960 --> 0:22:34.160
<v Speaker 2>something that isn't used anymore.

0:22:34.200 --> 0:22:34.440
<v Speaker 1>Really.

0:22:34.520 --> 0:22:38.199
<v Speaker 2>It's called inherent contempt power. It was last yused in

0:22:38.240 --> 0:22:41.879
<v Speaker 2>nineteen thirty five. And this is you know, this is

0:22:41.920 --> 0:22:44.600
<v Speaker 2>sort of the jail thing. And while there is no

0:22:44.720 --> 0:22:47.120
<v Speaker 2>capital jail, they do have a holding cell.

0:22:47.880 --> 0:22:50.879
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, and like the sergeant at arms of the Senate

0:22:51.000 --> 0:22:54.399
<v Speaker 4>or the House, depending on who's issuing the subpoena and

0:22:54.440 --> 0:22:59.040
<v Speaker 4>who voted to told you in contempt an armed officer

0:22:59.240 --> 0:23:03.200
<v Speaker 4>of the Congress will show up and say you're under arrest.

0:23:03.640 --> 0:23:06.760
<v Speaker 4>Congress says you're under arrest, you have to come with me, or,

0:23:07.359 --> 0:23:10.240
<v Speaker 4>as has been kind of boo bounced around lately by

0:23:11.320 --> 0:23:15.159
<v Speaker 4>Democrats in the House, replacing the idea of jailing somebody,

0:23:15.200 --> 0:23:18.400
<v Speaker 4>of arresting and jailing them with a much much stiffer

0:23:18.440 --> 0:23:21.399
<v Speaker 4>fine than people have traditionally faced, something more on the

0:23:21.520 --> 0:23:24.280
<v Speaker 4>order of I think between twenty five and two hundred

0:23:24.280 --> 0:23:27.560
<v Speaker 4>and fifty thousand dollars I think a day actually for

0:23:28.160 --> 0:23:30.960
<v Speaker 4>ignoring this kind of stuff, which we guess that would

0:23:31.000 --> 0:23:33.800
<v Speaker 4>get people moving if they actually go through.

0:23:33.600 --> 0:23:36.080
<v Speaker 2>With that, yeah, I would think. So hit them in

0:23:36.119 --> 0:23:38.160
<v Speaker 2>the pocketbook, yeah, I.

0:23:38.119 --> 0:23:41.040
<v Speaker 4>Mean that hard's and it pluses the government too. So

0:23:41.119 --> 0:23:43.760
<v Speaker 4>it's like, hey, you know these tax credits you're getting,

0:23:43.760 --> 0:23:46.080
<v Speaker 4>were taking those away and this tax return that you

0:23:46.080 --> 0:23:47.720
<v Speaker 4>were expecting, we're going to hang on to that Like

0:23:47.760 --> 0:23:50.760
<v Speaker 4>that's this is where they could actually do something.

0:23:51.840 --> 0:23:53.439
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think so.

0:23:53.920 --> 0:23:56.960
<v Speaker 2>If it's not a congressional subpoena, if it's just like

0:23:57.000 --> 0:23:59.960
<v Speaker 2>we're talking about a regular court subpoena, it all depends

0:24:00.080 --> 0:24:03.440
<v Speaker 2>and what jurisdiction you're in, and the presiding Chudge that's

0:24:03.800 --> 0:24:04.480
<v Speaker 2>on that case.

0:24:05.240 --> 0:24:09.600
<v Speaker 4>Yes, but again, because you can be arrested as a

0:24:09.600 --> 0:24:14.680
<v Speaker 4>matter of routine course of a court, you really should

0:24:14.920 --> 0:24:17.720
<v Speaker 4>respond at least to a subpoena or else. You know,

0:24:17.760 --> 0:24:20.160
<v Speaker 4>the chances of something happening to you from a court

0:24:20.200 --> 0:24:22.560
<v Speaker 4>of law are much higher than Congress apparently.

0:24:22.720 --> 0:24:25.720
<v Speaker 1>Sure, so can we talk about case law?

0:24:26.000 --> 0:24:29.159
<v Speaker 4>Yes, finally we got all that boring stuff out of

0:24:29.200 --> 0:24:29.520
<v Speaker 4>the way.

0:24:30.320 --> 0:24:33.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, this first one is kind of interesting. And the

0:24:33.240 --> 0:24:36.720
<v Speaker 2>way the judiciary works in this country is just super

0:24:36.720 --> 0:24:38.359
<v Speaker 2>fascinating to me. The older I get, the more I

0:24:38.400 --> 0:24:41.080
<v Speaker 2>read about it. I'm not becoming a legal wonk by.

0:24:40.960 --> 0:24:44.880
<v Speaker 3>Any means illegal legal, but I get.

0:24:44.720 --> 0:24:47.160
<v Speaker 1>It, Like, you know, I get it that people are

0:24:47.160 --> 0:24:48.280
<v Speaker 1>super into this kind of thing.

0:24:48.560 --> 0:24:50.960
<v Speaker 3>I hadn't realized you've gotten into the judiciary.

0:24:51.520 --> 0:24:53.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think it's pretty fascinating.

0:24:53.359 --> 0:24:55.919
<v Speaker 4>What got you into it? Just like news following the

0:24:55.960 --> 0:24:57.720
<v Speaker 4>news or something or uh.

0:24:57.400 --> 0:25:01.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, And it's just sort of reading about a case

0:25:01.960 --> 0:25:05.399
<v Speaker 2>like in this case from eighteen hundred, and then you

0:25:05.400 --> 0:25:09.040
<v Speaker 2>know precedent and what that means, right, and when it

0:25:09.040 --> 0:25:10.840
<v Speaker 2>shouldn't matter and should matter.

0:25:10.960 --> 0:25:12.919
<v Speaker 3>Like the one from eighteen hundred you're talking about is

0:25:13.080 --> 0:25:14.040
<v Speaker 3>US v. Cooper.

0:25:14.560 --> 0:25:17.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Thomas Cooper, who was a scientist and an attorney

0:25:17.960 --> 0:25:21.720
<v Speaker 2>and a thorn in the side of President John Adams

0:25:22.119 --> 0:25:23.320
<v Speaker 2>right in a big way.

0:25:23.960 --> 0:25:24.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:25:24.359 --> 0:25:27.840
<v Speaker 4>So, in I think seventeen ninety eight, Yeah, the US

0:25:27.920 --> 0:25:31.720
<v Speaker 4>passed the Sedition Act, which said that it's illegal to

0:25:31.840 --> 0:25:33.360
<v Speaker 4>criticize the US government.

0:25:33.680 --> 0:25:33.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:25:34.240 --> 0:25:37.400
<v Speaker 4>Unfortunately, when Thomas Jefferson came into office, he said, we're

0:25:37.440 --> 0:25:39.639
<v Speaker 4>gonna kind of do away with that and keep it

0:25:39.680 --> 0:25:43.920
<v Speaker 4>away forever as much as we can. But there was

0:25:43.960 --> 0:25:46.399
<v Speaker 4>a guy named Thomas Cooper, who, like you said, was

0:25:46.480 --> 0:25:49.719
<v Speaker 4>a thorn in the side of John Adams, and he

0:25:49.840 --> 0:25:52.400
<v Speaker 4>was arrested and prosecuted during a time when the Sedition

0:25:52.440 --> 0:25:55.720
<v Speaker 4>Act was still in effect, and he lost his case.

0:25:56.160 --> 0:25:59.639
<v Speaker 4>But the way that it relates to subpoenas an ignoring

0:25:59.640 --> 0:26:03.760
<v Speaker 4>subpoena is specifically the executive branch ignoring subpoenas. Is that

0:26:03.920 --> 0:26:06.080
<v Speaker 4>all the way back in eighteen hundred, when the United

0:26:06.119 --> 0:26:09.880
<v Speaker 4>States was just a couple of decades old, this guy,

0:26:09.960 --> 0:26:14.240
<v Speaker 4>Thomas Cooper, tried to subpoena John Adams to come testify

0:26:14.280 --> 0:26:17.920
<v Speaker 4>as part of this case, and the court said, we

0:26:18.000 --> 0:26:22.320
<v Speaker 4>don't really subpoena presidents we've decided. Yeah, and that's not

0:26:22.400 --> 0:26:25.080
<v Speaker 4>a precedent for the rest of history. It basically said

0:26:25.480 --> 0:26:30.600
<v Speaker 4>presidents are accepted from the goings on in normal court stuff,

0:26:30.680 --> 0:26:33.119
<v Speaker 4>even when they're directly related to the case.

0:26:33.320 --> 0:26:34.040
<v Speaker 3>They don't have to.

0:26:34.000 --> 0:26:37.040
<v Speaker 2>Come right, But that same case is said, but you

0:26:37.119 --> 0:26:39.280
<v Speaker 2>can subpoena it's someone from Congress.

0:26:39.520 --> 0:26:40.400
<v Speaker 3>That's a big one too.

0:26:40.560 --> 0:26:42.880
<v Speaker 2>That was a big one Cooper. It didn't work out

0:26:42.880 --> 0:26:45.600
<v Speaker 2>for Cooper, like you said, he was convicted. So none

0:26:45.680 --> 0:26:49.960
<v Speaker 2>of that mattered except for establishing this president president president.

0:26:49.720 --> 0:26:52.399
<v Speaker 3>You got it in this case. You could say it

0:26:52.440 --> 0:26:53.160
<v Speaker 3>either way.

0:26:53.240 --> 0:26:56.879
<v Speaker 1>I guess. So. So that moves us on to seven

0:26:56.960 --> 0:26:59.879
<v Speaker 1>years later US v. Burr.

0:27:01.560 --> 0:27:05.320
<v Speaker 2>This is John Marshall. Chief Justice John Marshall headed this

0:27:05.359 --> 0:27:09.360
<v Speaker 2>one up and basically this had to deal with President

0:27:09.359 --> 0:27:13.840
<v Speaker 2>Thomas Jefferson saying, hey, they want you to come to

0:27:14.119 --> 0:27:15.200
<v Speaker 2>provide these documents.

0:27:15.200 --> 0:27:21.879
<v Speaker 1>It was a Doozy's teacom, right, du says, c's doc's

0:27:22.119 --> 0:27:22.919
<v Speaker 1>Ducy's teacum.

0:27:23.600 --> 0:27:26.840
<v Speaker 2>And Jefferson was like, hey, here are some of those

0:27:26.920 --> 0:27:30.359
<v Speaker 2>documents that you want, and they're like, but where the

0:27:30.400 --> 0:27:32.320
<v Speaker 2>rest of them? He was like, you know, I'm not

0:27:32.400 --> 0:27:34.000
<v Speaker 2>going to give you those and I'm also not going

0:27:34.080 --> 0:27:35.920
<v Speaker 2>to show up because you know what, I got to

0:27:35.960 --> 0:27:36.679
<v Speaker 2>be presidenting.

0:27:37.480 --> 0:27:41.360
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I'm the executive branch is too powerful and too

0:27:41.600 --> 0:27:44.679
<v Speaker 4>or no, too important. It's the only branch that's supposed

0:27:44.720 --> 0:27:47.680
<v Speaker 4>to be open twenty four seven, three sixty five. Yeah,

0:27:48.000 --> 0:27:51.080
<v Speaker 4>and I just can't get away, like I'm my work

0:27:51.160 --> 0:27:53.280
<v Speaker 4>is too important to come be part of this, and

0:27:53.400 --> 0:27:54.919
<v Speaker 4>that gets think.

0:27:54.760 --> 0:27:59.480
<v Speaker 1>Gets less and less able to prove these days, I think, yeah,

0:27:59.560 --> 0:28:00.080
<v Speaker 1>for sure.

0:28:00.440 --> 0:28:02.520
<v Speaker 4>Like you could take off, I have a day, right,

0:28:02.600 --> 0:28:06.040
<v Speaker 4>you got a BlackBerry, you can definitely email, keep tabs

0:28:06.080 --> 0:28:07.080
<v Speaker 4>on work while you're gone.

0:28:07.400 --> 0:28:09.000
<v Speaker 3>But yeah, so I thought the same thing too.

0:28:09.080 --> 0:28:12.119
<v Speaker 4>That does not hold water, but it does set a

0:28:12.240 --> 0:28:16.040
<v Speaker 4>president for the president, like you were saying too in

0:28:16.160 --> 0:28:20.320
<v Speaker 4>those two cases basically say together again, the president doesn't

0:28:20.400 --> 0:28:24.720
<v Speaker 4>have to come be part of this, and executive privilege

0:28:25.080 --> 0:28:28.280
<v Speaker 4>is I guess where this came from from this particular

0:28:28.400 --> 0:28:31.359
<v Speaker 4>case where it's saying like, no, the president doesn't have

0:28:31.440 --> 0:28:33.320
<v Speaker 4>to have anything to do with this, and the president's

0:28:33.359 --> 0:28:37.640
<v Speaker 4>documents or the president's business and can't be subpoenaed because

0:28:38.200 --> 0:28:40.520
<v Speaker 4>we're going to call this executive privilege.

0:28:40.720 --> 0:28:44.960
<v Speaker 2>Right, And there are five basically five types generally of

0:28:45.120 --> 0:28:49.480
<v Speaker 2>executive privilege that have been used thus far. One is

0:28:49.560 --> 0:28:55.120
<v Speaker 2>presidential communications. Number two is the deliberative process. Number three

0:28:55.160 --> 0:28:59.440
<v Speaker 2>is attorney client communications, Big one. Fourth one is law

0:28:59.520 --> 0:29:04.960
<v Speaker 2>enforcement investigations. And the fifth one is anything that's sensitive

0:29:05.040 --> 0:29:09.280
<v Speaker 2>in terms of military or national security or diplomatic relations,

0:29:09.360 --> 0:29:09.880
<v Speaker 2>that kind of thing.

0:29:10.240 --> 0:29:13.600
<v Speaker 4>And that's the one in particular that has been upheld

0:29:13.640 --> 0:29:14.280
<v Speaker 4>over the years.

0:29:14.320 --> 0:29:15.160
<v Speaker 3>It's the idea that.

0:29:16.640 --> 0:29:21.200
<v Speaker 4>Like, there are secrets that the White House has that

0:29:21.320 --> 0:29:23.160
<v Speaker 4>it just need to be kept or else people are

0:29:23.200 --> 0:29:25.520
<v Speaker 4>going to lose their lives or else diplomatic ties are

0:29:25.560 --> 0:29:27.360
<v Speaker 4>going to be upset, that kind of stuff, and so

0:29:27.560 --> 0:29:30.840
<v Speaker 4>those should be protected under executive privilege. But the rest

0:29:30.880 --> 0:29:35.080
<v Speaker 4>of the stuff has been subject to scrutiny over the years,

0:29:35.160 --> 0:29:35.720
<v Speaker 4>for sure.

0:29:36.280 --> 0:29:39.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, because obviously an executive a president is going to

0:29:39.560 --> 0:29:42.080
<v Speaker 1>try and draw that privilege as broadly as possible.

0:29:42.360 --> 0:29:43.160
<v Speaker 3>Oh yeah, for sure.

0:29:43.280 --> 0:29:46.840
<v Speaker 4>And that's especially been the case ever since Nixon onward,

0:29:46.920 --> 0:29:51.640
<v Speaker 4>at least, where there's this idea called the unitary executive theory,

0:29:52.000 --> 0:29:54.760
<v Speaker 4>which is basically, like, you know, these are separate branches

0:29:54.800 --> 0:29:56.920
<v Speaker 4>of government, and the executive branch is in charge of

0:29:57.040 --> 0:29:59.840
<v Speaker 4>everything to do with the executive branch has, it's none

0:29:59.840 --> 0:30:06.240
<v Speaker 4>of Congress's business. And the executive is basically this extraordinarily

0:30:06.400 --> 0:30:12.400
<v Speaker 4>powerful single person, and that's been attempted to be invoked

0:30:12.520 --> 0:30:16.920
<v Speaker 4>and prove time and time again in throwing off Congressional oversight.

0:30:17.280 --> 0:30:18.760
<v Speaker 4>And that seems to be kind of what we're in

0:30:18.800 --> 0:30:21.200
<v Speaker 4>the midst of right now is a really big test

0:30:21.640 --> 0:30:25.880
<v Speaker 4>of this unitary executive theory in saying, like, no, not

0:30:26.040 --> 0:30:29.040
<v Speaker 4>only just the president, but the entire president staff and

0:30:29.080 --> 0:30:33.280
<v Speaker 4>in fact, the entire executive branch can ignore subpoenas from

0:30:33.320 --> 0:30:36.960
<v Speaker 4>Congress because Congress doesn't have any authority over the executive branch.

0:30:37.240 --> 0:30:39.760
<v Speaker 4>And that's kind of what we're witnessing right now. And

0:30:39.880 --> 0:30:42.600
<v Speaker 4>on the one hand, well, really there's really just one hand.

0:30:42.880 --> 0:30:47.000
<v Speaker 4>The great value of having an executive like almost a

0:30:47.920 --> 0:30:51.480
<v Speaker 4>well a unitary executive is that if you're a vested

0:30:51.560 --> 0:30:55.480
<v Speaker 4>interest or a very powerful group, you've only got one

0:30:55.560 --> 0:30:59.720
<v Speaker 4>person to change over to your side, rather than five hundred.

0:30:59.440 --> 0:31:02.160
<v Speaker 3>Of them, you know what I mean. Yeah, So it's

0:31:02.240 --> 0:31:02.800
<v Speaker 3>very dangerous.

0:31:02.840 --> 0:31:04.800
<v Speaker 4>It also very much flies in the face of the

0:31:05.120 --> 0:31:07.840
<v Speaker 4>three branches of government and the checks and balances that

0:31:07.880 --> 0:31:11.080
<v Speaker 4>each one's supposed to have over the other. Yes, because

0:31:11.920 --> 0:31:15.240
<v Speaker 4>part of Congress's role is what's called congressional oversight.

0:31:15.440 --> 0:31:15.600
<v Speaker 1>Yep.

0:31:15.960 --> 0:31:19.400
<v Speaker 4>That says we're responsible for making sure you're not getting

0:31:19.440 --> 0:31:22.840
<v Speaker 4>out of control the president. The executive branch has veto

0:31:22.960 --> 0:31:25.880
<v Speaker 4>power saying Congress, you guys are nuts, this is no

0:31:26.080 --> 0:31:27.160
<v Speaker 4>law that should be passed.

0:31:27.160 --> 0:31:29.959
<v Speaker 3>I'm going to say no to this law. And then

0:31:30.040 --> 0:31:32.400
<v Speaker 3>the judiciary has judicial review.

0:31:32.800 --> 0:31:35.640
<v Speaker 4>They get to say this law is unjust or this

0:31:36.640 --> 0:31:42.320
<v Speaker 4>executive agency's action is illegal. And by doing this, these

0:31:42.360 --> 0:31:45.320
<v Speaker 4>three branches keep one another from getting too strong. And

0:31:45.440 --> 0:31:48.280
<v Speaker 4>the unitary executive theory flies in the face of that

0:31:48.360 --> 0:31:50.680
<v Speaker 4>and says, no, the executive branch is more powerful than.

0:31:50.600 --> 0:31:52.600
<v Speaker 3>All of them. The other two don't have checks over them,

0:31:52.760 --> 0:31:54.440
<v Speaker 3>and let's just see what happens from here.

0:31:55.040 --> 0:31:57.040
<v Speaker 1>That's right. Should we talk about Watergate?

0:31:57.520 --> 0:31:57.720
<v Speaker 3>Yeah?

0:31:58.360 --> 0:32:01.479
<v Speaker 2>So everyone, we should do a full episode on Watergate.

0:32:01.520 --> 0:32:04.360
<v Speaker 2>I think I've said that before. I agree, but everyone

0:32:04.440 --> 0:32:08.440
<v Speaker 2>knows what happened there. President Nixon was involved in some

0:32:09.080 --> 0:32:15.560
<v Speaker 2>hinky activities and congressional committees. There was one special prosecutor

0:32:15.640 --> 0:32:19.040
<v Speaker 2>in particular named Archibald Cox, who said, wait a minute,

0:32:19.440 --> 0:32:22.160
<v Speaker 2>you've got these secret tapes. You've been taping people in

0:32:22.200 --> 0:32:25.480
<v Speaker 2>the Oval office turn them over. Here's a subpoena. We

0:32:25.600 --> 0:32:28.000
<v Speaker 2>demand that you turn that over along with some other stuff.

0:32:28.400 --> 0:32:31.920
<v Speaker 2>And Nan said, you demand, and we want you to

0:32:31.960 --> 0:32:35.040
<v Speaker 2>come here and testify as well. And of course Nixon

0:32:35.160 --> 0:32:36.800
<v Speaker 2>was like, I don't think that stuff's going to happen.

0:32:38.080 --> 0:32:41.680
<v Speaker 2>Here you go, here are some of these tapes. Just

0:32:41.840 --> 0:32:44.040
<v Speaker 2>ignore all the parts where it seems like it was

0:32:44.480 --> 0:32:48.320
<v Speaker 2>heavily edited and sounds real funny because someone who was

0:32:48.400 --> 0:32:50.040
<v Speaker 2>just in the room is no longer in the room,

0:32:50.600 --> 0:32:52.560
<v Speaker 2>and there are non sequiturs all over the place.

0:32:52.920 --> 0:32:54.840
<v Speaker 4>It's like the videotape of the guy who got the

0:32:54.920 --> 0:32:56.200
<v Speaker 4>high score in Donkey Kong.

0:32:56.640 --> 0:32:58.080
<v Speaker 3>Right, yeah, you know what I mean.

0:33:00.600 --> 0:33:04.560
<v Speaker 2>But executive privilege was what he claimed he was protected by.

0:33:04.760 --> 0:33:08.320
<v Speaker 2>So this went to the Supreme Court in nineteen seventy

0:33:08.360 --> 0:33:12.360
<v Speaker 2>four with United States v. Nixon, and Chief Justice Burger's

0:33:12.680 --> 0:33:16.840
<v Speaker 2>opinion cited everything from Justice Marshall's Marbury v. Madison to

0:33:17.440 --> 0:33:19.640
<v Speaker 2>the one we just talked about, United States v. BurrH

0:33:20.320 --> 0:33:25.080
<v Speaker 2>And basically, they're walking a fine line there with the

0:33:25.160 --> 0:33:27.880
<v Speaker 2>judiciary because they're saying, listen, the president needs to be

0:33:28.680 --> 0:33:34.120
<v Speaker 2>confidential and protected when executing these duties, these constitutional duties

0:33:34.560 --> 0:33:38.040
<v Speaker 2>on the one hand, but on the other hand, due

0:33:38.080 --> 0:33:40.960
<v Speaker 2>process of law is an important thing and that's what

0:33:41.000 --> 0:33:43.640
<v Speaker 2>we're in charge of. So they kind of ended up

0:33:43.960 --> 0:33:46.640
<v Speaker 2>wanting to protect each of the branch's needs.

0:33:46.920 --> 0:33:49.040
<v Speaker 4>It seems like, yeah, and I think they did a

0:33:49.120 --> 0:33:50.960
<v Speaker 4>very good job. And the fact that it was unanimous.

0:33:51.640 --> 0:33:55.560
<v Speaker 4>I think Rehnquist was involved with some of the people involved,

0:33:55.640 --> 0:33:59.640
<v Speaker 4>so he recused himself from voting, but it was unanimous

0:33:59.640 --> 0:34:02.520
<v Speaker 4>eight to zero vote saying no, you got to hand

0:34:03.120 --> 0:34:07.400
<v Speaker 4>the tapes over because we don't think that you're just

0:34:07.600 --> 0:34:12.440
<v Speaker 4>trying to protect like intelligent secrets or military secrets or

0:34:12.480 --> 0:34:16.160
<v Speaker 4>diplomatic secrets. We think you're just basically using the cover

0:34:16.320 --> 0:34:20.040
<v Speaker 4>of executive privilege to cover your own behind exactly, and

0:34:20.239 --> 0:34:23.960
<v Speaker 4>that does not supersede due process in a court of law,

0:34:24.360 --> 0:34:27.400
<v Speaker 4>which is going on over here with the trials of

0:34:27.440 --> 0:34:31.000
<v Speaker 4>these guys who broke into the Watergate. So you got

0:34:31.080 --> 0:34:33.560
<v Speaker 4>to hand over the tapes, and in doing so, like

0:34:33.640 --> 0:34:37.880
<v Speaker 4>you said, he cited another case Marbury v. Madison, And

0:34:37.960 --> 0:34:41.399
<v Speaker 4>that's a really really important case in here too, which

0:34:41.400 --> 0:34:43.839
<v Speaker 4>I think we should talk about starting now.

0:34:45.440 --> 0:34:48.279
<v Speaker 2>Well, I wanted to mention another quick thing before you

0:34:48.360 --> 0:34:51.120
<v Speaker 2>dive into Marbury another case usv.

0:34:51.239 --> 0:34:51.680
<v Speaker 1>At and T.

0:34:51.920 --> 0:34:55.160
<v Speaker 2>This just basically laid out that the courts are only

0:34:55.200 --> 0:34:57.480
<v Speaker 2>going to get involved if everyone really tried in good

0:34:57.520 --> 0:34:59.120
<v Speaker 2>faith to work it out beforehand.

0:35:00.160 --> 0:35:02.120
<v Speaker 1>Basically said, we're the last stop here.

0:35:02.760 --> 0:35:04.960
<v Speaker 2>Don't just go run into the Supreme Court or the

0:35:05.040 --> 0:35:07.279
<v Speaker 2>courts in general to figure this stuff out for you.

0:35:08.160 --> 0:35:12.120
<v Speaker 4>Right, Although I think the Constitution says that the Supreme

0:35:12.200 --> 0:35:14.520
<v Speaker 4>Court are the ones who are supposed to be running

0:35:14.600 --> 0:35:17.560
<v Speaker 4>the show when it comes to like a high enough official.

0:35:18.080 --> 0:35:20.200
<v Speaker 4>A case regarding a high enough official, Oh.

0:35:20.160 --> 0:35:21.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, all At and T.

0:35:22.040 --> 0:35:24.200
<v Speaker 2>The case said was you have to really try to

0:35:24.239 --> 0:35:26.520
<v Speaker 2>work it out amongst yourself before it even gets to us.

0:35:26.760 --> 0:35:29.080
<v Speaker 3>Oh gotcha. Okay, yeah, I gotcha. I see, I see

0:35:29.120 --> 0:35:29.960
<v Speaker 3>what you're saying. Yeah yeah.

0:35:30.800 --> 0:35:32.879
<v Speaker 1>So good faith, of course, is broadly defined too.

0:35:32.920 --> 0:35:38.879
<v Speaker 4>So in Marborie versus Madison, that one basically said, hey,

0:35:39.120 --> 0:35:40.600
<v Speaker 4>there's this one component here.

0:35:40.880 --> 0:35:41.319
<v Speaker 3>Yes, the.

0:35:42.800 --> 0:35:48.200
<v Speaker 4>We've established that the legislative branch Congress can issue subpoenas

0:35:48.640 --> 0:35:51.960
<v Speaker 4>and that the executive branch can exert executive privilege and

0:35:52.040 --> 0:35:55.920
<v Speaker 4>say no toe some subpoenas under some cases. But we're

0:35:55.960 --> 0:35:58.880
<v Speaker 4>also going to say In US v. Nixon in nineteen

0:35:58.920 --> 0:36:02.200
<v Speaker 4>seventy four, that the court can say, no, your right

0:36:02.320 --> 0:36:06.360
<v Speaker 4>to secrecy is overshadowed by a right to do process

0:36:06.440 --> 0:36:07.240
<v Speaker 4>in most cases.

0:36:08.120 --> 0:36:11.840
<v Speaker 3>But the one that really says at the center of.

0:36:11.920 --> 0:36:14.800
<v Speaker 4>This is the judiciary, and that the judiciary has a

0:36:14.960 --> 0:36:19.480
<v Speaker 4>right to decide cases where the legislative and executive branches

0:36:19.520 --> 0:36:23.200
<v Speaker 4>are in dispute. Is this Marbury versus Madison case from

0:36:23.280 --> 0:36:26.520
<v Speaker 4>I think eighteen oh four, and it was, from what

0:36:26.600 --> 0:36:34.480
<v Speaker 4>I understand, a masterstroke of legal eagleness by Justice John Marshall.

0:36:35.280 --> 0:36:35.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:36:35.719 --> 0:36:38.320
<v Speaker 2>So is the long and short of that one that

0:36:38.880 --> 0:36:42.320
<v Speaker 2>Secretary of Saint James Madison he was trying to withhold

0:36:42.920 --> 0:36:44.440
<v Speaker 2>the commission of William Marbury.

0:36:44.640 --> 0:36:45.239
<v Speaker 1>Was that the case?

0:36:45.520 --> 0:36:48.080
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, because the outgoing Adams had packed the courts with

0:36:48.239 --> 0:36:52.200
<v Speaker 4>friendly judges, the commissions had not all been mailed out,

0:36:52.280 --> 0:36:54.120
<v Speaker 4>and Madison was withholding some.

0:36:54.440 --> 0:36:56.719
<v Speaker 2>And they basically said, listen, man, you can't do this

0:36:57.680 --> 0:37:01.000
<v Speaker 2>like it is your job. You shall commission all the

0:37:01.080 --> 0:37:03.960
<v Speaker 2>officers of the United States. It's like right there in

0:37:04.040 --> 0:37:06.600
<v Speaker 2>black and white, and you lose, right.

0:37:06.719 --> 0:37:08.279
<v Speaker 3>So that was one part of it.

0:37:08.640 --> 0:37:11.279
<v Speaker 4>But what Marshall figured out and what made this a

0:37:11.440 --> 0:37:15.840
<v Speaker 4>master stroke of legal legalness, is that the there was

0:37:15.920 --> 0:37:20.160
<v Speaker 4>a something called a writ of mandamus, which basically says

0:37:20.239 --> 0:37:22.880
<v Speaker 4>you have to do this, which had been granted to

0:37:22.960 --> 0:37:26.920
<v Speaker 4>the Supreme Court in the like an Act in seventeen

0:37:26.960 --> 0:37:32.279
<v Speaker 4>eighty nine. Marshall said, so, yes, Madison has to give

0:37:32.400 --> 0:37:34.720
<v Speaker 4>this over like, this is just part of his duties,

0:37:34.760 --> 0:37:37.839
<v Speaker 4>and he's following a law that Congress made, so he's

0:37:37.920 --> 0:37:40.520
<v Speaker 4>subject to that law as a minister of the government.

0:37:40.880 --> 0:37:43.640
<v Speaker 4>But at the same time, the rit of mandamus power

0:37:43.719 --> 0:37:48.040
<v Speaker 4>that's a Supreme Court has been given is unconstitutional. We're

0:37:48.120 --> 0:37:50.880
<v Speaker 4>not in a position to issue a rid of mandamus

0:37:51.120 --> 0:37:54.480
<v Speaker 4>because under the Constitution we're not given that right. And

0:37:54.640 --> 0:37:58.520
<v Speaker 4>so in doing that, he established the Supreme Court as

0:37:58.560 --> 0:38:03.080
<v Speaker 4>the interpreter of what law is constitutional and what isn't right.

0:38:03.320 --> 0:38:05.640
<v Speaker 4>And he did that by saying, this law that gives

0:38:05.719 --> 0:38:09.239
<v Speaker 4>us this amazing power is unconstitutional. So he did it

0:38:09.280 --> 0:38:11.920
<v Speaker 4>by taking power away from the Supreme Court. But in

0:38:12.040 --> 0:38:15.680
<v Speaker 4>doing so, he gave the Supreme Court a tremendous a

0:38:15.760 --> 0:38:19.759
<v Speaker 4>tremendous advantage over the centuries in interpreting what law is

0:38:19.800 --> 0:38:22.640
<v Speaker 4>constitutional and what isn't and placing itself as the arbiter

0:38:23.080 --> 0:38:26.480
<v Speaker 4>of disputes between the legislative branch and the executive branch.

0:38:26.920 --> 0:38:28.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, which is I mean, that's a lot of what

0:38:28.640 --> 0:38:32.240
<v Speaker 2>the Supreme Court decides is constitutionality.

0:38:31.560 --> 0:38:34.600
<v Speaker 3>And it all comes from that eighteen and oh four case.

0:38:34.760 --> 0:38:38.560
<v Speaker 1>Landmark Legal Legal. Should we take another break?

0:38:38.760 --> 0:38:38.960
<v Speaker 3>Sure?

0:38:39.040 --> 0:38:40.840
<v Speaker 2>Man, all right, we'll take another break and talk a

0:38:40.880 --> 0:38:43.120
<v Speaker 2>little bit about a little bit more about Nixon and

0:38:43.239 --> 0:38:45.200
<v Speaker 2>what some other presidents have done when slapped with a

0:38:45.239 --> 0:38:46.279
<v Speaker 2>sabena right after that.

0:38:48.960 --> 0:38:49.200
<v Speaker 4>Jaw.

0:38:53.280 --> 0:39:11.840
<v Speaker 2>So we all know what happened to Nixon, what the

0:39:12.120 --> 0:39:15.360
<v Speaker 2>Justice did rule that, Hey, dude, you got to comply

0:39:15.520 --> 0:39:18.759
<v Speaker 2>with this Deucey's tectim here and you got to turn

0:39:18.840 --> 0:39:19.480
<v Speaker 2>over these tapes.

0:39:20.080 --> 0:39:22.960
<v Speaker 1>So Nixon, uh turned over tapes.

0:39:24.000 --> 0:39:25.520
<v Speaker 4>He did, and it all worked out in the end.

0:39:25.520 --> 0:39:28.440
<v Speaker 4>Everybody's like, this is what you were protecting. This is fine, man,

0:39:28.600 --> 0:39:31.239
<v Speaker 4>stay president for a couple more terms. And he did,

0:39:31.719 --> 0:39:33.360
<v Speaker 4>and the world was a better place.

0:39:33.239 --> 0:39:38.040
<v Speaker 1>For it, that's right. Flash forward to uh to Bill Clinton.

0:39:39.560 --> 0:39:40.160
<v Speaker 3>That was okay.

0:39:40.320 --> 0:39:41.880
<v Speaker 1>So he said, hey, listen, man.

0:39:42.360 --> 0:39:44.560
<v Speaker 3>What goes on and that's much better.

0:39:44.840 --> 0:39:48.040
<v Speaker 2>What happens in the Oval office stays in the oval office.

0:39:48.960 --> 0:39:53.799
<v Speaker 2>Executive privilege. They're like even that stuff. And he said, well,

0:39:54.640 --> 0:39:58.840
<v Speaker 2>you know, it's it's his executive privilege. Harika Panke falls

0:39:58.920 --> 0:40:02.440
<v Speaker 2>under executive privileg So he said, I have executive unity,

0:40:02.520 --> 0:40:06.840
<v Speaker 2>I have that privilege, and neither me nor my aides

0:40:07.000 --> 0:40:10.600
<v Speaker 2>have to respond to these subpoenas. And then he fell

0:40:10.640 --> 0:40:12.240
<v Speaker 2>into line eventually.

0:40:12.960 --> 0:40:14.640
<v Speaker 3>Due Gingrich got him into line.

0:40:15.200 --> 0:40:18.680
<v Speaker 1>Well, yeah, and largely because of US v. Nixon.

0:40:19.920 --> 0:40:22.759
<v Speaker 2>They said, you know what, you can't stand by this

0:40:22.960 --> 0:40:27.400
<v Speaker 2>broad executive privilege, stand behind this wall that you've built.

0:40:28.320 --> 0:40:32.760
<v Speaker 1>You're going to have to comply. And he did eventually right.

0:40:32.680 --> 0:40:36.719
<v Speaker 4>Which is traditionally what happens, like the Congress issues subpoenas,

0:40:36.760 --> 0:40:40.840
<v Speaker 4>is an executive branch ignores it. The Congress holds the

0:40:40.920 --> 0:40:44.800
<v Speaker 4>executive branch and contempt, and the judiciary comes in and

0:40:45.400 --> 0:40:49.080
<v Speaker 4>almost always says, no, you're over exerting your executive privilege

0:40:49.239 --> 0:40:50.560
<v Speaker 4>to what they're saying.

0:40:50.600 --> 0:40:53.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, which you know that gives me hope because in

0:40:53.520 --> 0:40:57.080
<v Speaker 2>the past president has been set that due process wins

0:40:57.120 --> 0:41:00.239
<v Speaker 2>out over executive privilege kind of across the board, it

0:41:00.320 --> 0:41:01.960
<v Speaker 2>seems like, but that that.

0:41:02.160 --> 0:41:07.319
<v Speaker 4>Only holds as long as two things are upheld. One

0:41:07.560 --> 0:41:13.400
<v Speaker 4>that the Supreme Court is an independent body, regardless of

0:41:13.440 --> 0:41:17.960
<v Speaker 4>who appointed the judges, and then two if the as

0:41:18.040 --> 0:41:21.800
<v Speaker 4>long as the executive branch recognizes the authority of the

0:41:21.880 --> 0:41:22.600
<v Speaker 4>Supreme Court.

0:41:23.719 --> 0:41:25.680
<v Speaker 3>This is where we are starting.

0:41:26.560 --> 0:41:30.320
<v Speaker 4>Like some people can see far enough along this horizon

0:41:30.400 --> 0:41:34.120
<v Speaker 4>that hey, this path we're heading down right now, there's

0:41:34.200 --> 0:41:37.160
<v Speaker 4>a point where we could reach where they could be.

0:41:37.440 --> 0:41:41.040
<v Speaker 4>There could be a Supreme Court decision that says, yes,

0:41:41.160 --> 0:41:46.600
<v Speaker 4>executive branch, you have to hand over these aids for testimony.

0:41:46.880 --> 0:41:51.800
<v Speaker 4>They have to come testify about you know, Russian interference

0:41:51.840 --> 0:41:55.160
<v Speaker 4>in the twenty sixteen election or this call between the

0:41:55.280 --> 0:41:59.959
<v Speaker 4>president and the Ukrainian president, and the executive branch still

0:42:00.120 --> 0:42:04.040
<v Speaker 4>says no. And that is the point that everyone says,

0:42:04.239 --> 0:42:05.840
<v Speaker 4>we have no idea what happens?

0:42:05.920 --> 0:42:07.640
<v Speaker 3>Then we have no idea.

0:42:07.800 --> 0:42:11.040
<v Speaker 4>Do you go arrest these you know, the secretary of

0:42:11.320 --> 0:42:14.800
<v Speaker 4>the Treasury, Do you go arrest these cabinet members? This

0:42:14.840 --> 0:42:17.640
<v Speaker 4>has never been done before, Like what remedy do you

0:42:17.760 --> 0:42:20.800
<v Speaker 4>really have? And that's where that's where we are with

0:42:20.960 --> 0:42:25.080
<v Speaker 4>testing out this unitary executive theory. How far can you

0:42:25.280 --> 0:42:31.000
<v Speaker 4>kick the the kind of unwritten rules of the constitution. Well,

0:42:31.040 --> 0:42:33.279
<v Speaker 4>there's lots of written rules with constitution, but also like

0:42:33.360 --> 0:42:37.360
<v Speaker 4>the the unwritten rules and procedures that kind of have

0:42:38.120 --> 0:42:40.840
<v Speaker 4>have guided all of this for so long. What happens

0:42:40.880 --> 0:42:44.040
<v Speaker 4>when those things just stop being recognized as valid?

0:42:44.719 --> 0:42:45.320
<v Speaker 3>What do you do?

0:42:46.320 --> 0:42:46.520
<v Speaker 1>Well?

0:42:46.680 --> 0:42:49.960
<v Speaker 2>I don't know because in the in the past, through

0:42:50.000 --> 0:42:51.880
<v Speaker 2>our history, and this is on both sides of the

0:42:52.040 --> 0:42:57.719
<v Speaker 2>of the Isle, Democrats and Republicans have always not successfully,

0:42:57.800 --> 0:42:59.840
<v Speaker 2>but they've always tried to argue that court should not

0:43:00.520 --> 0:43:03.480
<v Speaker 2>get in the subpoena battles and should not get involved

0:43:03.560 --> 0:43:07.479
<v Speaker 2>with this executive privileged claim right.

0:43:07.400 --> 0:43:13.240
<v Speaker 4>And in particular, Trump's latest Trump's Legal Council's latest position,

0:43:13.719 --> 0:43:17.560
<v Speaker 4>which I think came out in September of this year,

0:43:18.719 --> 0:43:19.640
<v Speaker 4>is it's a doozy.

0:43:19.719 --> 0:43:22.080
<v Speaker 3>It basically takes And here's here's.

0:43:21.840 --> 0:43:24.160
<v Speaker 4>Something we need to remember here, Like this is not

0:43:24.400 --> 0:43:27.239
<v Speaker 4>brand new with Donald Trump, right, Like if you if

0:43:27.280 --> 0:43:30.360
<v Speaker 4>you can't stand Donald Trump, this is this is his

0:43:30.880 --> 0:43:34.960
<v Speaker 4>White House. His administration is building on stuff that previous

0:43:35.000 --> 0:43:38.400
<v Speaker 4>presidents have built on both Democrats and Republicans alike. There

0:43:38.440 --> 0:43:42.600
<v Speaker 4>has been a real push, basically since Nixon, to to

0:43:42.920 --> 0:43:46.480
<v Speaker 4>instill as much power into the presidency and the executive

0:43:46.520 --> 0:43:50.600
<v Speaker 4>branch as possible, and this is an extreme version of that,

0:43:50.840 --> 0:43:53.920
<v Speaker 4>but it's still kind of following the same path. But

0:43:54.120 --> 0:43:57.120
<v Speaker 4>what they're what they're doing is more aggressive than what

0:43:57.280 --> 0:44:00.360
<v Speaker 4>previous administrations have done. And they're basically saying saying this,

0:44:01.360 --> 0:44:05.520
<v Speaker 4>if you subpoena us the executive branch, if you the

0:44:05.680 --> 0:44:08.640
<v Speaker 4>Congress subpoena one of our people, any of our people,

0:44:08.760 --> 0:44:13.719
<v Speaker 4>for any reason whatsoever, the President can say, no, do

0:44:15.200 --> 0:44:17.560
<v Speaker 4>not respond to that subpoena, do not go before Congress,

0:44:17.680 --> 0:44:19.600
<v Speaker 4>do not hand over those documents. I'm the president, I'm

0:44:19.680 --> 0:44:24.240
<v Speaker 4>ordering you to. Congress can issue a rid of contempt

0:44:24.640 --> 0:44:27.200
<v Speaker 4>or find the person in contempt, but that's it.

0:44:27.320 --> 0:44:29.640
<v Speaker 3>That's where it ends. Because the president can say, well,

0:44:30.080 --> 0:44:33.200
<v Speaker 3>this is an inter branch dispute between the legislative branch

0:44:33.400 --> 0:44:36.360
<v Speaker 3>and the executive branch. And because the.

0:44:38.120 --> 0:44:41.520
<v Speaker 4>Judiciary can't be drafted or shouldn't be drafted in to

0:44:41.640 --> 0:44:46.520
<v Speaker 4>solve these disputes, that's all it will remain is an

0:44:46.560 --> 0:44:49.960
<v Speaker 4>inner branch dispute, and the Supreme Court really has no

0:44:50.680 --> 0:44:54.600
<v Speaker 4>purview in deciding these cases. And when you have that,

0:44:54.800 --> 0:44:58.160
<v Speaker 4>then that means that the executive branch has been removed

0:44:58.880 --> 0:45:02.000
<v Speaker 4>from the oversight of law law. It becomes above the law,

0:45:02.080 --> 0:45:04.640
<v Speaker 4>The law no longer applies to it, and so whatever

0:45:04.719 --> 0:45:07.840
<v Speaker 4>the president wants to do. Whatever the President directs his

0:45:08.000 --> 0:45:12.640
<v Speaker 4>or her agencies to do is de facto legal, just

0:45:12.760 --> 0:45:15.840
<v Speaker 4>because the president and the executive branch are not subject

0:45:15.920 --> 0:45:18.480
<v Speaker 4>to the laws of the land, including rulings by the

0:45:18.640 --> 0:45:22.200
<v Speaker 4>highest court in the United States. That's what the latest

0:45:22.239 --> 0:45:23.400
<v Speaker 4>argument is sting us up for.

0:45:24.000 --> 0:45:25.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean, this is what the Justice Department.

0:45:25.880 --> 0:45:28.839
<v Speaker 2>There was a great article in the Washington Post by

0:45:28.920 --> 0:45:32.760
<v Speaker 2>Harry Littman called the Justice Department's outlandish and arrogant position

0:45:33.320 --> 0:45:37.040
<v Speaker 2>on congressional subpoenas, And this is from the article. It said,

0:45:37.040 --> 0:45:40.239
<v Speaker 2>according to the Justice Department, there is no constitutional or

0:45:40.280 --> 0:45:43.560
<v Speaker 2>statutory basis for a congressional committee to try to enforce

0:45:43.600 --> 0:45:46.640
<v Speaker 2>his subpoenas in the federal courts where the executive branch

0:45:46.719 --> 0:45:47.840
<v Speaker 2>has decided not to do so.

0:45:48.520 --> 0:45:52.279
<v Speaker 1>Right, So basically, yeah, they said no, and so they

0:45:52.320 --> 0:45:52.640
<v Speaker 1>said no.

0:45:53.040 --> 0:45:57.240
<v Speaker 4>And all of this arose from an opinion regarding Trump's

0:45:57.239 --> 0:45:58.360
<v Speaker 4>tax returns, I believe.

0:45:58.760 --> 0:46:00.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's sort of where the whole thing got started.

0:46:01.120 --> 0:46:03.799
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, where the Treasury Secretary, Stephen Mnushin said no, we're

0:46:03.840 --> 0:46:06.680
<v Speaker 4>not doing that, and Congress said, well, we're holding you

0:46:06.760 --> 0:46:09.200
<v Speaker 4>in contempt. And then the Legal Office of Legal counsel

0:46:09.239 --> 0:46:12.000
<v Speaker 4>from the White House issued this opinion, and I mean

0:46:12.080 --> 0:46:14.400
<v Speaker 4>it's a doozy, but it's also saying like, what are

0:46:14.400 --> 0:46:15.120
<v Speaker 4>you guys going to do?

0:46:15.440 --> 0:46:18.239
<v Speaker 3>What can you do? And that's that's the that's the

0:46:18.280 --> 0:46:19.279
<v Speaker 3>big question now.

0:46:19.719 --> 0:46:21.680
<v Speaker 2>Well, and it makes you wonder what would have happened

0:46:21.719 --> 0:46:26.719
<v Speaker 2>if darryl Isa's bill had gone through? That makes subpoenas

0:46:26.719 --> 0:46:30.640
<v Speaker 2>super enforceable, right, because you know, we've seen it on

0:46:30.840 --> 0:46:34.799
<v Speaker 2>again on both sides of the aisle where one one

0:46:34.840 --> 0:46:38.800
<v Speaker 2>political party will get mad and and vote something in

0:46:39.080 --> 0:46:40.759
<v Speaker 2>that will come back to sting them later on.

0:46:41.600 --> 0:46:43.840
<v Speaker 1>Right on the hind end, it is.

0:46:43.960 --> 0:46:47.879
<v Speaker 4>But also you also can't help but wonder, like will

0:46:48.440 --> 0:46:56.480
<v Speaker 4>like is a republicans loyalty to Congress greater than the

0:46:56.560 --> 0:47:01.000
<v Speaker 4>Republican's loyalty to the executive branch. It's like, you know,

0:47:01.360 --> 0:47:04.360
<v Speaker 4>in any restaurant, there's tension between the white staff and

0:47:04.400 --> 0:47:07.320
<v Speaker 4>the kitchen staff, but they're all working at the same restaurant.

0:47:07.320 --> 0:47:08.800
<v Speaker 4>They're all trying to do the same thing, which is

0:47:08.920 --> 0:47:12.719
<v Speaker 4>get high quality, nourishing meals out to the patrons who

0:47:12.760 --> 0:47:16.200
<v Speaker 4>are citizens like you and me, Right, but there's still tension.

0:47:16.280 --> 0:47:18.520
<v Speaker 4>You're not doing it fast enough. Or you you burn

0:47:18.600 --> 0:47:21.440
<v Speaker 4>these fries or something like that. But we benefit from

0:47:21.480 --> 0:47:24.279
<v Speaker 4>that tension, We the patrons of this restaurant that we

0:47:24.400 --> 0:47:25.239
<v Speaker 4>call America.

0:47:25.600 --> 0:47:27.880
<v Speaker 2>That's right, Well, what happened the end of the day,

0:47:27.920 --> 0:47:30.600
<v Speaker 2>Everyone just goes behind the restaurant and smokes a joint

0:47:30.640 --> 0:47:31.120
<v Speaker 2>by the dumpster.

0:47:31.440 --> 0:47:34.200
<v Speaker 4>You know, maybe that would make our Congress or our

0:47:34.280 --> 0:47:37.400
<v Speaker 4>government work more efficiently if the executive branch and the

0:47:37.440 --> 0:47:40.239
<v Speaker 4>legislative branch and the judicial branch all got together and

0:47:40.840 --> 0:47:44.400
<v Speaker 4>burned a dooby together by the grease s trap, right exactly.

0:47:45.080 --> 0:47:48.040
<v Speaker 4>I don't even remember what my analogy was meant to insert.

0:47:48.160 --> 0:47:53.120
<v Speaker 4>But we it's fine, but we like we are witnessing

0:47:53.239 --> 0:47:57.360
<v Speaker 4>some historical stuff right now that that is not normal

0:47:57.560 --> 0:48:00.800
<v Speaker 4>at all. I mean, like from water stuff and that

0:48:01.120 --> 0:48:04.279
<v Speaker 4>I'm not even relating to impeachment proceedings. I'm just saying, like,

0:48:04.760 --> 0:48:09.920
<v Speaker 4>this level of ignoring congressional subpoenas may be unprecedented, and

0:48:10.040 --> 0:48:13.120
<v Speaker 4>if not, then the closest historical president we have is

0:48:13.239 --> 0:48:17.560
<v Speaker 4>the Watergate scandal. Yeah, but I think Congress is one

0:48:17.719 --> 0:48:21.400
<v Speaker 4>recourse to say, that's fine, that's fine, minution, you just

0:48:21.520 --> 0:48:24.360
<v Speaker 4>ignore us. We're going over here as Congress, and we

0:48:24.440 --> 0:48:29.640
<v Speaker 4>are altering this our ability to jail people to say no, actually,

0:48:29.719 --> 0:48:32.239
<v Speaker 4>we can find you two hundred and fifty thousand dollars

0:48:32.280 --> 0:48:35.800
<v Speaker 4>a day and we will do it. That could be

0:48:35.920 --> 0:48:39.759
<v Speaker 4>the leverage that gets people to actually comply with these subpoenas.

0:48:39.960 --> 0:48:42.520
<v Speaker 4>But we'll find out, because if Congress has to actually

0:48:42.600 --> 0:48:45.160
<v Speaker 4>pass a law to do that, the president has veto

0:48:45.280 --> 0:48:46.799
<v Speaker 4>power over that well.

0:48:46.920 --> 0:48:48.759
<v Speaker 2>And there are also all sorts of other things have

0:48:48.920 --> 0:48:51.600
<v Speaker 2>nothing to do with this, that Congress uses as leverage

0:48:52.840 --> 0:48:55.960
<v Speaker 2>or negotiation tactics, like, hey, do you want us to

0:48:56.000 --> 0:49:00.200
<v Speaker 2>push through some of these appointees or should we just

0:49:00.280 --> 0:49:03.680
<v Speaker 2>keep stalling forever? All kinds of that stuff is on

0:49:03.760 --> 0:49:06.080
<v Speaker 2>the table. But when you have a president that comes

0:49:06.120 --> 0:49:09.319
<v Speaker 2>out in January and says, you know what, I don't

0:49:09.360 --> 0:49:11.640
<v Speaker 2>mind stall all you want. I like the term acting

0:49:12.800 --> 0:49:16.360
<v Speaker 2>because that gives me more leeway. Then all of a sudden,

0:49:16.480 --> 0:49:17.600
<v Speaker 2>that's not leverage anymore.

0:49:18.120 --> 0:49:18.879
<v Speaker 3>You got anything else?

0:49:19.120 --> 0:49:20.800
<v Speaker 1>No, I'm very curious to see what happens with this

0:49:20.920 --> 0:49:22.759
<v Speaker 1>McGan case. Probably nothing, I am too.

0:49:22.880 --> 0:49:25.200
<v Speaker 3>Will it be the crumbling of our democracy? Who knows?

0:49:25.280 --> 0:49:26.560
<v Speaker 3>We'll find out in a few years.

0:49:28.120 --> 0:49:30.080
<v Speaker 4>If you want to know more about subpoenas, we'll just

0:49:30.160 --> 0:49:33.040
<v Speaker 4>go look it up and if you get a subpoena yourself.

0:49:32.760 --> 0:49:35.560
<v Speaker 3>Get a lawyer. Don't be stupid. And since I said

0:49:35.600 --> 0:49:37.839
<v Speaker 3>don't be stupid, friends, it's time for a listener. Mayw.

0:49:40.160 --> 0:49:47.360
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna this is about Obama's healthcare. I got a

0:49:47.400 --> 0:49:49.120
<v Speaker 2>bunch of stuff about this. I didn't realize I made

0:49:49.120 --> 0:49:52.000
<v Speaker 2>a prediction. Oh okay, oh yeah, yeah, yeah, that one's

0:49:52.040 --> 0:49:55.320
<v Speaker 2>kind of been sitting in the in the coffers. Okay, guys,

0:49:56.320 --> 0:49:58.120
<v Speaker 2>about fifteen months ago I start of my journey through

0:49:58.160 --> 0:49:58.439
<v Speaker 2>the stuff.

0:49:58.440 --> 0:49:58.800
<v Speaker 1>You should know.

0:49:58.920 --> 0:50:01.080
<v Speaker 2>Archives have been on the steady campaign about twelve to

0:50:01.160 --> 0:50:02.319
<v Speaker 2>sixteen episodes a week.

0:50:02.719 --> 0:50:03.240
<v Speaker 3>That's healthy.

0:50:03.560 --> 0:50:05.799
<v Speaker 1>Wow, why I'm writing though?

0:50:05.880 --> 0:50:08.120
<v Speaker 2>Ten years ago Chuck made a bold prediction and the rumors,

0:50:08.160 --> 0:50:12.440
<v Speaker 2>the myths and truths behind Obama's healthcare plan episodes.

0:50:13.120 --> 0:50:14.200
<v Speaker 1>Didn't we do like four of those?

0:50:16.160 --> 0:50:18.000
<v Speaker 3>We did? Yeah? I think we did four.

0:50:18.440 --> 0:50:22.560
<v Speaker 2>You're right, But this one was specifically about that episode, Chuck,

0:50:22.800 --> 0:50:25.160
<v Speaker 2>I said, call me in ten years if there are

0:50:25.200 --> 0:50:28.160
<v Speaker 2>no more private insurance companies, because that was one of

0:50:28.200 --> 0:50:30.279
<v Speaker 2>the big knocks on it. It's like, this is going

0:50:30.320 --> 0:50:33.239
<v Speaker 2>to do away with private insurance, and I'll buy you

0:50:33.360 --> 0:50:39.320
<v Speaker 2>a beer Chuck legitimately said I'm on record, and he

0:50:39.360 --> 0:50:42.240
<v Speaker 2>extended the bet to anyone out there. Now, that statement

0:50:42.360 --> 0:50:44.720
<v Speaker 2>was more of a gentleman's bet than a legal promise, however,

0:50:45.840 --> 0:50:48.879
<v Speaker 2>that is more binding in my opinion. Nonetheless, I would

0:50:48.960 --> 0:50:51.200
<v Speaker 2>like to congratulate you, Chuck. I was getting worried there

0:50:51.239 --> 0:50:54.200
<v Speaker 2>for a second on the expiration of that term and

0:50:54.280 --> 0:50:57.400
<v Speaker 2>that promisory statement. That could have been a pretty pricey liability.

0:50:57.719 --> 0:50:59.279
<v Speaker 2>That things turned out little differently a.

0:50:59.520 --> 0:51:03.279
<v Speaker 3>Million Chuck, every single one of our listeners would have

0:51:03.320 --> 0:51:04.719
<v Speaker 3>written in and asked for it. I know.

0:51:05.440 --> 0:51:07.040
<v Speaker 1>That is from Jack Simmons.

0:51:08.160 --> 0:51:10.400
<v Speaker 4>Nice going, Jack, and welcome to the club. We're glad

0:51:10.440 --> 0:51:13.040
<v Speaker 4>you've found us, and even more so that you like us,

0:51:13.080 --> 0:51:14.560
<v Speaker 4>so we'll do our best.

0:51:14.400 --> 0:51:16.279
<v Speaker 2>To keep it up for you and everybody else that

0:51:16.400 --> 0:51:19.320
<v Speaker 2>emails a couple of months, although he's probably forgotten about it.

0:51:19.320 --> 0:51:22.480
<v Speaker 3>Sorry, that's right, he's moved on to podsave America. That's right.

0:51:23.400 --> 0:51:25.000
<v Speaker 4>Well, if you want to get in touch with us,

0:51:25.080 --> 0:51:28.720
<v Speaker 4>like Jack did, you can go on to stuff youshould

0:51:28.760 --> 0:51:31.239
<v Speaker 4>know dot com check out our social links there. You

0:51:31.320 --> 0:51:33.640
<v Speaker 4>can also send us an email, wrap it up, spank

0:51:33.680 --> 0:51:35.880
<v Speaker 4>it on the bottom and send it off to stuff

0:51:35.920 --> 0:51:37.759
<v Speaker 4>podcast at iHeartRadio dot com.

0:51:40.960 --> 0:51:43.800
<v Speaker 1>Stuff you Should Know is a production of iHeartRadio. For

0:51:43.960 --> 0:51:48.080
<v Speaker 1>more podcasts my heart Radio, visit the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts,

0:51:48.239 --> 0:51:50.040
<v Speaker 1>or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.