WEBVTT - QB Draft Class Deep Dive with Jon Ledyard

0:00:05.160 --> 0:00:08.800
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to NFL Daily, where we're always trying not to

0:00:08.840 --> 0:00:09.920
<v Speaker 1>reach for quarterbacks.

0:00:09.920 --> 0:00:10.880
<v Speaker 2>I'm Greg Rosenthal.

0:00:10.920 --> 0:00:14.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm in the Chris Westling podcast studio, and I am

0:00:14.680 --> 0:00:18.919
<v Speaker 1>joined by one of the best minds in the podcasting

0:00:19.320 --> 0:00:23.520
<v Speaker 1>writing game. It's John Ledyard. He's got the Audibles and

0:00:23.640 --> 0:00:28.640
<v Speaker 1>Analytics substack. He's got a great podcast with Ali Connolly. John,

0:00:28.760 --> 0:00:29.560
<v Speaker 1>What is happening?

0:00:30.960 --> 0:00:32.960
<v Speaker 3>Man? Not too much? Thank you for the kind words.

0:00:32.960 --> 0:00:34.919
<v Speaker 3>First of all, always fun to be on here with

0:00:34.960 --> 0:00:36.920
<v Speaker 3>you and talking some ball. I believe last time we

0:00:36.960 --> 0:00:41.519
<v Speaker 3>talked we ranked in tiered tight ends. A lot of

0:00:41.560 --> 0:00:44.360
<v Speaker 3>backlash for that, so I'm excited to I'm sure get

0:00:44.360 --> 0:00:46.120
<v Speaker 3>no backlash for today's podcast.

0:00:46.479 --> 0:00:48.479
<v Speaker 1>No, and I don't even know if we're gonna rank it.

0:00:48.520 --> 0:00:52.400
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna talk quarterback. So I've been not pimping but

0:00:52.880 --> 0:00:55.600
<v Speaker 1>getting ready for this week now for a while saying,

0:00:55.640 --> 0:00:58.440
<v Speaker 1>like you know, we're getting into the draft. It's been

0:00:58.480 --> 0:01:01.160
<v Speaker 1>a slow process. I got the weekly show with Daniel Jeremiah.

0:01:01.200 --> 0:01:04.760
<v Speaker 1>Audibles and Analytics is another one that people should check

0:01:04.760 --> 0:01:07.759
<v Speaker 1>out with you and Ali, DJ and I are on Thursdays.

0:01:07.800 --> 0:01:10.280
<v Speaker 1>But like now, it's go time. We are two and

0:01:10.280 --> 0:01:14.080
<v Speaker 1>a half weeks out from the draft. Every day now

0:01:14.280 --> 0:01:17.720
<v Speaker 1>is draft, and we're going to talk quarterbacks today and

0:01:17.800 --> 0:01:21.720
<v Speaker 1>kind of keep it specifically two quarterbacks, and I'm not

0:01:21.760 --> 0:01:23.760
<v Speaker 1>gonna put you and make you do a ranking, but

0:01:23.760 --> 0:01:25.680
<v Speaker 1>we'll talk about good fits and we'll kind of order

0:01:25.760 --> 0:01:28.160
<v Speaker 1>him in some sort of way. And I guess we

0:01:28.240 --> 0:01:30.959
<v Speaker 1>might as well just start at the top now because

0:01:31.000 --> 0:01:33.160
<v Speaker 1>we've talked draft. It's not like cam Ward has not

0:01:33.280 --> 0:01:35.720
<v Speaker 1>come up on this show. But I don't I don't

0:01:35.720 --> 0:01:40.600
<v Speaker 1>think we've dived deep into what makes him special? Kind

0:01:40.640 --> 0:01:44.280
<v Speaker 1>of what was your journey with cam Ward as a

0:01:44.360 --> 0:01:47.560
<v Speaker 1>prospect and where did you land in terms of like

0:01:47.960 --> 0:01:49.720
<v Speaker 1>how special do you think he is?

0:01:50.960 --> 0:01:53.120
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, the profile is weird right away, right twenty three

0:01:53.200 --> 0:01:56.720
<v Speaker 3>year old rookie. He'll be three different schools, so you're

0:01:56.800 --> 0:01:59.160
<v Speaker 3>already like, O, guess maybe it's red flag right now.

0:01:59.280 --> 0:02:03.120
<v Speaker 1>One of the schools was Incarnate word, which yeah, yeah.

0:02:02.920 --> 0:02:06.000
<v Speaker 3>Which is necessarily what you traditionally think of as the trajectory.

0:02:06.040 --> 0:02:08.160
<v Speaker 3>But you know, the multiple school thing, you know we're

0:02:08.160 --> 0:02:10.480
<v Speaker 3>starting to move with that's more normal. Three is still

0:02:10.520 --> 0:02:12.840
<v Speaker 3>you know, being an older rookiees And I to be

0:02:12.880 --> 0:02:14.959
<v Speaker 3>honest with you, Greg, like people just didn't talk about

0:02:15.120 --> 0:02:17.920
<v Speaker 3>caim Ward like a special should be the top overall

0:02:17.919 --> 0:02:21.000
<v Speaker 3>pick even the beginning of the season. So to say

0:02:21.000 --> 0:02:22.840
<v Speaker 3>it's come out of nowhere isn't fair because he's been

0:02:22.880 --> 0:02:24.639
<v Speaker 3>on the radar for everybody for a long time. We've

0:02:24.680 --> 0:02:27.520
<v Speaker 3>known the skill set and the traits are interesting. I

0:02:27.520 --> 0:02:29.600
<v Speaker 3>think this year he got better in some really key

0:02:29.639 --> 0:02:31.840
<v Speaker 3>ways though, which makes him you know, he's my top quarterback.

0:02:31.840 --> 0:02:34.400
<v Speaker 3>I think he's most people's top quarterback the NFL. Generally,

0:02:34.440 --> 0:02:36.400
<v Speaker 3>everything we hear is, yeah, this guy's going first, and

0:02:36.480 --> 0:02:38.720
<v Speaker 3>almost every team has him first, and it's not that

0:02:38.800 --> 0:02:40.720
<v Speaker 3>close to in a tier by himself type of guy

0:02:40.760 --> 0:02:43.240
<v Speaker 3>and in this class I think now. I think one

0:02:43.280 --> 0:02:45.919
<v Speaker 3>of the things that it's really interesting is one of

0:02:45.919 --> 0:02:47.680
<v Speaker 3>the things he did really poorly in the past was

0:02:47.720 --> 0:02:49.680
<v Speaker 3>managed the pocket, and this is still an area of

0:02:49.680 --> 0:02:51.840
<v Speaker 3>growth for him and where he needs to continue to

0:02:51.840 --> 0:02:53.639
<v Speaker 3>grow in a lot. But I mean, his pressure to

0:02:53.720 --> 0:02:56.120
<v Speaker 3>Zach Ray went down this year fifteen point nine percent

0:02:56.400 --> 0:02:58.560
<v Speaker 3>was a big step in the right direction for him.

0:02:58.600 --> 0:03:01.120
<v Speaker 3>So that just it's the ability to manage the game

0:03:01.160 --> 0:03:02.920
<v Speaker 3>a little bit better now. His footwork he still need

0:03:03.040 --> 0:03:04.480
<v Speaker 3>some work in terms of being able to set up

0:03:04.480 --> 0:03:06.920
<v Speaker 3>the right way. This guy is so lax and the

0:03:07.000 --> 0:03:09.440
<v Speaker 3>details sometimes and he can get away within the college

0:03:09.440 --> 0:03:11.000
<v Speaker 3>ball and he might be able to do it some

0:03:11.040 --> 0:03:12.600
<v Speaker 3>of the NFL. Some of these guys do do it

0:03:12.600 --> 0:03:14.239
<v Speaker 3>in the NFL, and he's a pretty great arm. I

0:03:14.280 --> 0:03:17.240
<v Speaker 3>don't think he's quite that special so from a talent perspective,

0:03:17.280 --> 0:03:19.520
<v Speaker 3>so I do think he needs to continue to develop

0:03:19.520 --> 0:03:22.720
<v Speaker 3>in those ways. But watching some of the processing stuff

0:03:22.720 --> 0:03:25.040
<v Speaker 3>get faster, and the other key thing, I think he

0:03:25.120 --> 0:03:27.040
<v Speaker 3>just throws to every spot on the field like he

0:03:27.080 --> 0:03:30.520
<v Speaker 3>will throw in breakers with anticipation, which to me show

0:03:30.520 --> 0:03:32.200
<v Speaker 3>there's a lot of development and growth there. He's playing

0:03:32.240 --> 0:03:34.320
<v Speaker 3>a little bit of a step ahead right now, so

0:03:34.720 --> 0:03:37.320
<v Speaker 3>encouraging signs in the right direction and some really key

0:03:37.360 --> 0:03:40.040
<v Speaker 3>areas of quarterback play this past season where why I

0:03:40.080 --> 0:03:42.120
<v Speaker 3>think he's really not only is easy the best in

0:03:42.160 --> 0:03:44.000
<v Speaker 3>the class, but he's moving in the right direction.

0:03:44.000 --> 0:03:45.720
<v Speaker 2>Right It is funny.

0:03:45.760 --> 0:03:50.440
<v Speaker 1>I love the draft community, and yet you really don't

0:03:50.480 --> 0:03:53.440
<v Speaker 1>know where these players are going to land until pretty

0:03:53.520 --> 0:03:56.720
<v Speaker 1>late in the process. I remember RG three, there was

0:03:56.960 --> 0:04:00.440
<v Speaker 1>no one saying that he was gonna be going top

0:04:00.520 --> 0:04:04.640
<v Speaker 1>two until very late in that season, and not to

0:04:04.680 --> 0:04:08.080
<v Speaker 1>pick on him. But I remember like a podcast episode

0:04:08.280 --> 0:04:10.560
<v Speaker 1>Jim Naggy was on who knows more about these prospects

0:04:10.600 --> 0:04:13.360
<v Speaker 1>than anyone? He was running the Senior Bowl for many years,

0:04:13.400 --> 0:04:16.120
<v Speaker 1>and he was on with Mickshaye and he was talking

0:04:16.200 --> 0:04:19.359
<v Speaker 1>in the middle of this season, Hey, don't count on

0:04:19.480 --> 0:04:21.800
<v Speaker 1>cam Ward as a first round pick. Like the reason

0:04:21.839 --> 0:04:24.240
<v Speaker 1>he went back to school was teams were telling Amy

0:04:24.400 --> 0:04:26.560
<v Speaker 1>was a fifth or sixth round pick if he was

0:04:26.600 --> 0:04:28.599
<v Speaker 1>going to come out last year. He actually wasn't even

0:04:28.640 --> 0:04:30.839
<v Speaker 1>going to be invited to the Senior Bowl, which is

0:04:30.880 --> 0:04:33.760
<v Speaker 1>crazy to think. And now he's the number one overall pick,

0:04:33.839 --> 0:04:37.080
<v Speaker 1>and A, you don't know how a player is going

0:04:37.160 --> 0:04:40.039
<v Speaker 1>to develop, and then B you don't really know how

0:04:40.080 --> 0:04:42.200
<v Speaker 1>teams are going to look at him. And I think

0:04:42.279 --> 0:04:45.160
<v Speaker 1>when they look at his tape from this season and

0:04:45.720 --> 0:04:49.640
<v Speaker 1>I dove into it, there's so much to be excited about.

0:04:49.760 --> 0:04:53.679
<v Speaker 1>I mean, putting a far of comparison on someone is crazy,

0:04:53.880 --> 0:04:56.520
<v Speaker 1>but because he definitely doesn't have like that arm, but

0:04:56.640 --> 0:04:59.359
<v Speaker 1>in terms of the taking the chances, but enough of

0:04:59.400 --> 0:05:02.720
<v Speaker 1>a pocket fe like a better scrambler and athlete than

0:05:02.760 --> 0:05:05.120
<v Speaker 1>he is, like a runner like you, than he's sort

0:05:05.160 --> 0:05:09.360
<v Speaker 1>of being given credit for and just making it all happen.

0:05:09.480 --> 0:05:12.320
<v Speaker 1>Like I'm in Like he's going to add a lot

0:05:12.320 --> 0:05:14.320
<v Speaker 1>of value to my life, John, That's what I care

0:05:14.600 --> 0:05:16.880
<v Speaker 1>most about. I think he's going to be box office

0:05:17.279 --> 0:05:19.160
<v Speaker 1>and he's gonna be a fun player to watch. And

0:05:19.160 --> 0:05:22.000
<v Speaker 1>that level of chill that you described in terms of

0:05:22.040 --> 0:05:25.080
<v Speaker 1>how relax he is back there, I think there is

0:05:25.120 --> 0:05:27.320
<v Speaker 1>there's some negatives to it, but there's some positives to

0:05:27.400 --> 0:05:30.279
<v Speaker 1>it as well. He's certainly like not afraid of the

0:05:30.320 --> 0:05:32.080
<v Speaker 1>pass rush, and I think he plays in such a

0:05:32.080 --> 0:05:35.719
<v Speaker 1>relaxed way it makes you think at least that mentally,

0:05:35.880 --> 0:05:38.159
<v Speaker 1>I think he's he's got a lot going on where

0:05:38.200 --> 0:05:40.520
<v Speaker 1>the game is not too fast for him, certainly after

0:05:40.560 --> 0:05:41.719
<v Speaker 1>all that college experience.

0:05:42.600 --> 0:05:44.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think that's the biggest thing is everything's just

0:05:44.600 --> 0:05:46.679
<v Speaker 3>sort of slowed down for him, Like he just feels

0:05:46.680 --> 0:05:49.000
<v Speaker 3>more confident. Even from the beginning of the season to

0:05:49.080 --> 0:05:50.560
<v Speaker 3>the end of the season. I think we saw that

0:05:50.640 --> 0:05:53.440
<v Speaker 3>a lot, Like there was a lot of notable things

0:05:53.440 --> 0:05:54.799
<v Speaker 3>in the early in the season where he was drifting

0:05:54.800 --> 0:05:56.320
<v Speaker 3>around in the pocket, he was a little bit unsure

0:05:56.360 --> 0:05:58.240
<v Speaker 3>planning on time, and then as the season went on,

0:05:58.320 --> 0:05:59.760
<v Speaker 3>he was playing his best ball. He was getting the

0:05:59.760 --> 0:06:03.280
<v Speaker 3>ball more on time. So there's definitely things to work on.

0:06:03.320 --> 0:06:06.359
<v Speaker 3>This is not the most home run quarterback prospect that

0:06:06.400 --> 0:06:08.960
<v Speaker 3>we've seen there by any stretch of the imagination. There

0:06:09.000 --> 0:06:10.920
<v Speaker 3>are things that he needs to get better at. There

0:06:11.000 --> 0:06:13.360
<v Speaker 3>is bus potential here even I would think I would say,

0:06:13.640 --> 0:06:16.280
<v Speaker 3>I don't know that that's not what I'm betting on happening,

0:06:16.279 --> 0:06:18.680
<v Speaker 3>But I think it's important to acknowledge that it's more

0:06:18.720 --> 0:06:21.279
<v Speaker 3>possible here than it is with a lot of qb

0:06:21.400 --> 0:06:24.039
<v Speaker 3>ones and other drafts. Not necessarily because this draft is

0:06:24.080 --> 0:06:26.480
<v Speaker 3>so bad, just sort of because who Ward is as

0:06:26.520 --> 0:06:28.680
<v Speaker 3>a player. There are some things about his game that

0:06:28.720 --> 0:06:31.400
<v Speaker 3>I said have improved, but ultimately he will throw it

0:06:31.440 --> 0:06:32.840
<v Speaker 3>to the other team at times, and he will take

0:06:32.920 --> 0:06:35.200
<v Speaker 3>risks with the ball that he shouldn't, and those sorts

0:06:35.240 --> 0:06:38.400
<v Speaker 3>of things combined with if the pocket stuff doesn't get better,

0:06:38.400 --> 0:06:40.360
<v Speaker 3>because right now, he's getting the ball out on time more,

0:06:40.520 --> 0:06:42.640
<v Speaker 3>he's not taking sacks more than he wants to, but

0:06:42.680 --> 0:06:45.440
<v Speaker 3>he's still making some questionable decisions, and he's still not

0:06:45.640 --> 0:06:48.360
<v Speaker 3>setting up properly all the time. His setup is really

0:06:48.839 --> 0:06:50.600
<v Speaker 3>kind of all over the place terms how he throws.

0:06:50.640 --> 0:06:52.839
<v Speaker 3>He doesn't mind drifting back and throwing off his back foot,

0:06:52.880 --> 0:06:56.640
<v Speaker 3>and he and Sanders honestly have some similarities in their weaknesses.

0:06:56.680 --> 0:06:58.760
<v Speaker 3>They're different in terms of their strengths, but in some

0:06:58.960 --> 0:07:01.720
<v Speaker 3>terms of their weaknesses. Ward can get away with some

0:07:01.760 --> 0:07:04.240
<v Speaker 3>of those messy footwork things a little bit, but I

0:07:04.320 --> 0:07:06.000
<v Speaker 3>don't think, like I said, that it's going to be

0:07:06.240 --> 0:07:09.000
<v Speaker 3>quite at that level where it's so special doesn't matter

0:07:09.000 --> 0:07:10.840
<v Speaker 3>what his feet look like. I still think he needs

0:07:10.880 --> 0:07:12.720
<v Speaker 3>to get better at some of those details. So and

0:07:12.760 --> 0:07:14.200
<v Speaker 3>if he doesn't, it's the type of thing that could

0:07:14.280 --> 0:07:17.560
<v Speaker 3>lead to like pretty big lapses in offense where he's

0:07:17.560 --> 0:07:19.840
<v Speaker 3>not going to be able to be just to manage

0:07:19.640 --> 0:07:22.960
<v Speaker 3>the situation type of player. He's going to be a

0:07:22.960 --> 0:07:25.080
<v Speaker 3>baller and that's either gonna work or it isn't. And

0:07:25.120 --> 0:07:27.720
<v Speaker 3>so there is some bust potential just in his profile

0:07:27.720 --> 0:07:28.280
<v Speaker 3>as a player.

0:07:28.400 --> 0:07:30.000
<v Speaker 1>Ray I'm trying to think of someone else that would

0:07:30.040 --> 0:07:33.120
<v Speaker 1>just be described as as chill as he is.

0:07:33.760 --> 0:07:35.800
<v Speaker 3>I mean, Sanders has some of sure.

0:07:36.360 --> 0:07:38.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean Cam had a little bit of that that

0:07:38.440 --> 0:07:41.120
<v Speaker 1>he was just so big that he sort of didn't

0:07:41.120 --> 0:07:44.640
<v Speaker 1>care what was happening around it. Ryan Tannehill weirdly just

0:07:44.880 --> 0:07:47.480
<v Speaker 1>was kind of chill back back there if he wanted,

0:07:47.520 --> 0:07:50.520
<v Speaker 1>but not like the same, sort of like loose athlete.

0:07:50.600 --> 0:07:53.040
<v Speaker 1>The thing is, if you're grading the flashes, you see

0:07:53.040 --> 0:07:56.360
<v Speaker 1>it all. You do see anticipation. You do see him

0:07:56.360 --> 0:07:58.720
<v Speaker 1>going through his reads. You see him kind of lock

0:07:58.800 --> 0:08:02.239
<v Speaker 1>in and lock out in games. But that shows me like, Okay,

0:08:02.280 --> 0:08:04.960
<v Speaker 1>maybe if the competition in the NFL, maybe he can

0:08:06.000 --> 0:08:10.000
<v Speaker 1>lock in a little more consistency consistently. Let's think about

0:08:10.200 --> 0:08:12.280
<v Speaker 1>the fit with the Titans, because I haven't really asked

0:08:12.320 --> 0:08:14.200
<v Speaker 1>anyone about this or thought about it too much and

0:08:14.240 --> 0:08:18.000
<v Speaker 1>don't think I'm the right person to give an answer

0:08:18.040 --> 0:08:21.240
<v Speaker 1>for it. Him. With Brian Callahan, I feel like there

0:08:21.280 --> 0:08:23.440
<v Speaker 1>hasn't been a lot of talk of like, Okay, how

0:08:23.440 --> 0:08:26.240
<v Speaker 1>do you think that works? I'm not really sure what

0:08:26.280 --> 0:08:29.240
<v Speaker 1>a Brian Callahan offense is, so that's part of the

0:08:29.240 --> 0:08:32.040
<v Speaker 1>difficulty here. But how do you think, with what you

0:08:32.080 --> 0:08:35.160
<v Speaker 1>know about Callahan and the Titans, like how that fits together?

0:08:36.520 --> 0:08:39.680
<v Speaker 3>It's really interesting because Callahan, you know, was with Burrow

0:08:39.800 --> 0:08:43.600
<v Speaker 3>and then got to Tennessee and not that surprisingly, I guess,

0:08:43.600 --> 0:08:45.719
<v Speaker 3>but trying to run totally different stuff than what he

0:08:45.800 --> 0:08:47.560
<v Speaker 3>ran with Burrow, Like it wouldn't look anything like the

0:08:47.600 --> 0:08:50.080
<v Speaker 3>offense the Bengals run. Not that not that really anybody

0:08:50.080 --> 0:08:52.880
<v Speaker 3>looks like the offense the Bengals ran. So he I

0:08:52.960 --> 0:08:55.120
<v Speaker 3>really have no idea. Like he was with Will Levis

0:08:55.160 --> 0:08:56.760
<v Speaker 3>and that didn't work, and so it was kind of like, Okay,

0:08:56.800 --> 0:08:59.840
<v Speaker 3>it was more traditional stuff. I think my guess is

0:08:59.880 --> 0:09:02.560
<v Speaker 3>that that would be I think the thing with Callian

0:09:02.679 --> 0:09:04.880
<v Speaker 3>is he'll build the offense around the player and Ward.

0:09:04.920 --> 0:09:07.600
<v Speaker 3>Obviously you didn't work under center, So is a lot

0:09:07.640 --> 0:09:09.360
<v Speaker 3>of like gonna be a lot of gun stuff. I

0:09:09.400 --> 0:09:12.000
<v Speaker 3>think will look just like a spread it around the

0:09:12.080 --> 0:09:14.640
<v Speaker 3>yard and throw it around everywhere, like Joe Burrow did.

0:09:15.040 --> 0:09:16.800
<v Speaker 3>I don't think that's in the cards. To me, that

0:09:16.840 --> 0:09:18.880
<v Speaker 3>would be really surprising if they made it look just

0:09:18.960 --> 0:09:21.120
<v Speaker 3>like that. Is word going to have to do some

0:09:21.160 --> 0:09:24.680
<v Speaker 3>more traditional quarterback stuff that he hasn't done before. I

0:09:24.720 --> 0:09:27.880
<v Speaker 3>don't know. This is the most unknown fit of a

0:09:27.920 --> 0:09:29.800
<v Speaker 3>top team in quarterback that I can remember in a

0:09:29.840 --> 0:09:32.880
<v Speaker 3>long time, because I don't know how the Titans even

0:09:32.920 --> 0:09:34.880
<v Speaker 3>in so recently. I don't think people thought they thought

0:09:34.880 --> 0:09:36.920
<v Speaker 3>of him this way. I don't know how they see him.

0:09:36.960 --> 0:09:39.000
<v Speaker 3>I don't know what they see as being the best

0:09:39.000 --> 0:09:42.160
<v Speaker 3>fit for him. I don't think anything Callahan's really done

0:09:42.280 --> 0:09:45.440
<v Speaker 3>in the past the past year with the Titans or

0:09:45.480 --> 0:09:48.040
<v Speaker 3>with the Bengals is going to be particularly Maybe I'll

0:09:48.040 --> 0:09:49.360
<v Speaker 3>be wrong, but I think we don't think it's going

0:09:49.400 --> 0:09:52.040
<v Speaker 3>to be particularly informative to us in terms of guessing

0:09:52.080 --> 0:09:55.000
<v Speaker 3>what he'll look like, what it'll look like with cam Ward,

0:09:55.280 --> 0:09:56.960
<v Speaker 3>other than to say I think there will be a

0:09:56.960 --> 0:09:59.320
<v Speaker 3>lot of the gun elements, but I bet that there's

0:09:59.400 --> 0:10:01.640
<v Speaker 3>some more. I mean, they ran a lot. There's a

0:10:01.679 --> 0:10:03.920
<v Speaker 3>lot of RPOs in Miami's offense, like you know, I

0:10:04.000 --> 0:10:06.760
<v Speaker 3>think there'll be some of that still in Tennessee's offense

0:10:06.800 --> 0:10:09.800
<v Speaker 3>as well. But I am fascinated to know how much

0:10:09.840 --> 0:10:12.640
<v Speaker 3>he's going to ask him Ward to be more traditional.

0:10:12.760 --> 0:10:14.240
<v Speaker 3>Is there going to be dropback stuff? Is there going

0:10:14.280 --> 0:10:16.040
<v Speaker 3>to be play action stuff where he goes under center

0:10:16.080 --> 0:10:18.679
<v Speaker 3>and like right, I really don't know if that's part

0:10:18.720 --> 0:10:20.280
<v Speaker 3>of it. That's going to be so amazing to see

0:10:20.280 --> 0:10:22.160
<v Speaker 3>if Ward can do that, because there's a guy who's

0:10:22.200 --> 0:10:25.600
<v Speaker 3>been three different places and transformed himself and changed and

0:10:25.640 --> 0:10:28.120
<v Speaker 3>adapted over the years. But that would be at another

0:10:28.200 --> 0:10:29.360
<v Speaker 3>leap for him right out of the gate.

0:10:29.400 --> 0:10:31.760
<v Speaker 1>On paper, No, I mean meet him where he is,

0:10:32.360 --> 0:10:35.240
<v Speaker 1>meet him where he is and build an offense around

0:10:35.240 --> 0:10:37.920
<v Speaker 1>his strengths. And he was very good at the RPO stuff,

0:10:38.040 --> 0:10:40.560
<v Speaker 1>and like I said, I think he'll be box office

0:10:40.559 --> 0:10:42.880
<v Speaker 1>And then you keep adding that it's like it's like

0:10:42.920 --> 0:10:45.480
<v Speaker 1>they did such a good job with Jayden and Daniels

0:10:45.480 --> 0:10:48.360
<v Speaker 1>accentuating his strength. A very different player than Jade Daniels.

0:10:48.400 --> 0:10:50.080
<v Speaker 1>He's gonna have a lot of turnovers. I mean, he

0:10:50.200 --> 0:10:54.120
<v Speaker 1>just is as a rookie. But to me, I want

0:10:54.320 --> 0:10:57.400
<v Speaker 1>a player that's gonna entertain me. And so maybe it's

0:10:57.400 --> 0:10:59.200
<v Speaker 1>the Tennessee of it all, but he's there's like a

0:10:59.200 --> 0:11:01.840
<v Speaker 1>little Cutler, Like I knew Cutler would entertain me as

0:11:01.840 --> 0:11:04.160
<v Speaker 1>a pro and he absolutely did. And I think Ward

0:11:04.240 --> 0:11:08.040
<v Speaker 1>might might end up fitting into that archetype of People

0:11:08.040 --> 0:11:10.560
<v Speaker 1>have compared him a little bit to Jordan Love Either way, Like,

0:11:10.640 --> 0:11:12.840
<v Speaker 1>I think he's going to be fun to watch and

0:11:12.920 --> 0:11:15.520
<v Speaker 1>so he's going to be starting right away and hopefully

0:11:15.520 --> 0:11:16.920
<v Speaker 1>they do meet him where he is.

0:11:16.920 --> 0:11:18.240
<v Speaker 2>All right, let's talk about Shoulder.

0:11:18.400 --> 0:11:23.079
<v Speaker 1>So the consensus second quarterback in this class, but I

0:11:23.120 --> 0:11:27.280
<v Speaker 1>think the differing opinions are mostly about do you just

0:11:27.679 --> 0:11:32.560
<v Speaker 1>group Shoulder with Jackson Dart and Tyler Shuck and the

0:11:32.600 --> 0:11:35.480
<v Speaker 1>rest of this crew as like kind of a second group.

0:11:35.559 --> 0:11:38.240
<v Speaker 1>I know our friend Nate Tice does, for instance, he

0:11:38.320 --> 0:11:41.320
<v Speaker 1>just thinks the rest of the group are varying levels

0:11:41.320 --> 0:11:44.679
<v Speaker 1>of day two dart throws and shoulders in that group.

0:11:45.080 --> 0:11:48.440
<v Speaker 1>Or do you kind of see him a tier above

0:11:48.600 --> 0:11:50.480
<v Speaker 1>not really thinking about where he's going to go because

0:11:50.480 --> 0:11:53.200
<v Speaker 1>he's almost certainly going to go in the first round somewhere,

0:11:53.480 --> 0:11:57.360
<v Speaker 1>I think, but just more of the total evaluation because

0:11:57.360 --> 0:11:59.199
<v Speaker 1>it's such a hard he's a tricky evaluation.

0:12:00.520 --> 0:12:00.800
<v Speaker 2>He is.

0:12:00.800 --> 0:12:02.920
<v Speaker 3>He's an interesting player. I think the player that he

0:12:03.000 --> 0:12:04.840
<v Speaker 3>most compares to. We didn't talk about this too much

0:12:04.880 --> 0:12:07.200
<v Speaker 3>with Ward, I think, but with Sanders, I think the

0:12:07.200 --> 0:12:10.240
<v Speaker 3>player most compares to is brock Purty at his best,

0:12:10.280 --> 0:12:12.200
<v Speaker 3>if he can be at his peak. I think they're

0:12:12.200 --> 0:12:14.280
<v Speaker 3>both guys who take a little bit of time to

0:12:14.320 --> 0:12:17.439
<v Speaker 3>make decisions. They have sort of a moxie about how

0:12:17.440 --> 0:12:20.439
<v Speaker 3>they play and a confidence about how they play. They

0:12:20.559 --> 0:12:23.439
<v Speaker 3>like to hold the ball. They aren't gonna be amazing

0:12:23.880 --> 0:12:25.960
<v Speaker 3>testing athletes. I don't think aybody wants them to be like, oh,

0:12:26.000 --> 0:12:28.560
<v Speaker 3>they're amazing, Like they're just so athletic and so springy,

0:12:28.559 --> 0:12:31.320
<v Speaker 3>and twitchy, and but when it comes to functional mobility

0:12:31.320 --> 0:12:32.960
<v Speaker 3>for their position, I think they both have enough. Party

0:12:33.000 --> 0:12:35.240
<v Speaker 3>is probably a little more athletic than Sanders, I think,

0:12:35.480 --> 0:12:37.120
<v Speaker 3>but I think they have enough to manage and to

0:12:37.120 --> 0:12:39.480
<v Speaker 3>get by. They do some un orthodox things in terms

0:12:39.480 --> 0:12:41.559
<v Speaker 3>of how they manage the pocket and playing on time,

0:12:41.920 --> 0:12:44.319
<v Speaker 3>but they throw really accurate balls, and they throw and

0:12:44.360 --> 0:12:47.240
<v Speaker 3>they throw despite not having great arms, they throw the

0:12:47.280 --> 0:12:49.760
<v Speaker 3>ball well. So I think they're If Sanders can reach

0:12:49.760 --> 0:12:52.200
<v Speaker 3>his peak, it'll be something like brock Purty. Now, brock

0:12:52.200 --> 0:12:54.000
<v Speaker 3>Perry's in a great situation. He's got some of the

0:12:54.040 --> 0:12:56.680
<v Speaker 3>best teammates in the entire NFL that certainly he got

0:12:56.720 --> 0:12:58.120
<v Speaker 3>some of the best coaching in the league. All that

0:12:58.200 --> 0:13:00.640
<v Speaker 3>is aided the profile and what he's see somewhere in

0:13:00.640 --> 0:13:03.840
<v Speaker 3>that probably twelve to eighteen range as terms the best

0:13:03.920 --> 0:13:06.840
<v Speaker 3>quarterbacks in the league somewhere in there. So maybe that's

0:13:06.880 --> 0:13:09.520
<v Speaker 3>the ceiling for Sanders, But I see him pretty similar

0:13:09.559 --> 0:13:12.160
<v Speaker 3>doubt Nate does it sounds like and just that thinking

0:13:12.160 --> 0:13:15.920
<v Speaker 3>that at least he and Dart are really different, really different,

0:13:16.000 --> 0:13:19.680
<v Speaker 3>but maybe the same tier. To me, Sanders is sharp mentally,

0:13:20.160 --> 0:13:22.760
<v Speaker 3>whereas Dart, I think, continues to need to develop from

0:13:22.760 --> 0:13:25.600
<v Speaker 3>the neck up. And with Sanders, I love that he

0:13:25.679 --> 0:13:27.480
<v Speaker 3>looks like he's played quarterback for a long time and

0:13:27.520 --> 0:13:30.520
<v Speaker 3>that part, yeah, is natural to him. The accuracy in

0:13:30.520 --> 0:13:32.520
<v Speaker 3>the ball plays in a natural but I think that

0:13:32.600 --> 0:13:35.600
<v Speaker 3>there's real concerns over his arm strength and his time

0:13:35.840 --> 0:13:37.880
<v Speaker 3>to throw in the pocket, just how long it takes

0:13:37.960 --> 0:13:40.280
<v Speaker 3>him to make decisions. He knows what to do. He

0:13:40.400 --> 0:13:43.720
<v Speaker 3>just likes to play this like hero mentality ball, where

0:13:43.720 --> 0:13:46.360
<v Speaker 3>he's probably gonna take shots and he doesn't mind getting

0:13:46.400 --> 0:13:48.440
<v Speaker 3>hit at all and he'll just let himself get lined

0:13:48.520 --> 0:13:51.360
<v Speaker 3>up and cleaned out in that way. Yeah, it reminds

0:13:51.440 --> 0:13:52.960
<v Speaker 3>me of Cam Newton and that he would just take

0:13:53.080 --> 0:13:55.920
<v Speaker 3>massive shots to make plays. So I think Sanders has

0:13:55.960 --> 0:13:58.240
<v Speaker 3>some of that without really any of the physical tools that.

0:13:58.240 --> 0:14:01.040
<v Speaker 1>Newton has right at some point that it's going to

0:14:01.120 --> 0:14:03.599
<v Speaker 1>come back to get you just taking the types of

0:14:03.640 --> 0:14:08.080
<v Speaker 1>hits that he did. And their offensive line was terrible overall,

0:14:08.360 --> 0:14:10.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean it really was, especially at the tackles, but

0:14:11.360 --> 0:14:14.840
<v Speaker 1>there were certainly plays where what you're talking about comes

0:14:15.280 --> 0:14:18.800
<v Speaker 1>into play where he's the one really just inviting that

0:14:19.000 --> 0:14:21.560
<v Speaker 1>pressure and he tries to be a playmaker and he's

0:14:21.600 --> 0:14:23.920
<v Speaker 1>not a great playmaker. The best plays are definitely the

0:14:23.960 --> 0:14:26.960
<v Speaker 1>ones that are in structure. It always worries me if

0:14:26.960 --> 0:14:30.720
<v Speaker 1>you're betting on intangibles, and I just think it's such

0:14:30.720 --> 0:14:33.520
<v Speaker 1>a hard evaluation because he's been coached the same way

0:14:33.560 --> 0:14:34.120
<v Speaker 1>this whole time.

0:14:34.200 --> 0:14:35.160
<v Speaker 2>He is a good quarterback.

0:14:35.160 --> 0:14:39.800
<v Speaker 1>It's like, does Travis Hunter like even out like lifting

0:14:39.880 --> 0:14:41.920
<v Speaker 1>him up because a lot of his long plays, Like

0:14:42.240 --> 0:14:45.120
<v Speaker 1>Travis Hunter is making great plays on the ball on

0:14:45.200 --> 0:14:48.080
<v Speaker 1>those plays. So to me, it's very difficult when you're

0:14:48.080 --> 0:14:52.640
<v Speaker 1>betting on in tangibles. I do think he's gotten a

0:14:52.640 --> 0:14:55.720
<v Speaker 1>bump from just it happens in some drafts, and it

0:14:55.760 --> 0:14:59.000
<v Speaker 1>happens with some name value Occasionally, we'll have to wait

0:14:59.080 --> 0:15:03.800
<v Speaker 1>till the draft actually happens. Occasionally, like the NFL sees

0:15:03.880 --> 0:15:07.680
<v Speaker 1>him totally differently and we will be just talking about

0:15:07.760 --> 0:15:09.640
<v Speaker 1>him falling down to the twenties. So it'd be interesting,

0:15:09.680 --> 0:15:11.200
<v Speaker 1>by the way, with the forty nine ers, he was

0:15:11.240 --> 0:15:12.680
<v Speaker 1>on the board for the forty nine ers, would they

0:15:12.680 --> 0:15:15.320
<v Speaker 1>ever just like totally change course and be like, yeah,

0:15:15.360 --> 0:15:17.200
<v Speaker 1>we're not going to give you that Conjack Brack pretty

0:15:17.240 --> 0:15:17.840
<v Speaker 1>that would be fun.

0:15:18.960 --> 0:15:21.400
<v Speaker 3>I don't think they would, But uh, I don't I'm

0:15:21.560 --> 0:15:23.800
<v Speaker 3>surprised you with the Niners these days. They're pretty, they're

0:15:23.800 --> 0:15:26.320
<v Speaker 3>wild and kind of I think one of the craziest

0:15:26.320 --> 0:15:30.280
<v Speaker 3>things about Sanders' profile he is one of the highest UH.

0:15:30.440 --> 0:15:32.280
<v Speaker 3>I think he was tenth highest in the nationwalks all

0:15:32.320 --> 0:15:35.200
<v Speaker 3>college quarterbacks. An average time to throw this past year

0:15:35.280 --> 0:15:37.640
<v Speaker 3>to three point one to two seconds. This is average

0:15:37.640 --> 0:15:39.800
<v Speaker 3>time to throw. This is also one of the highest

0:15:39.920 --> 0:15:43.520
<v Speaker 3>RPO in screen heavy offenses in the league. How do

0:15:43.560 --> 0:15:45.560
<v Speaker 3>you end up with that time to throw in an

0:15:45.600 --> 0:15:48.000
<v Speaker 3>offense that has this many RPOs and screens in it?

0:15:48.200 --> 0:15:55.920
<v Speaker 3>I mean, the offense is painfully, painfully simple, painfully poorly constructed.

0:15:56.280 --> 0:15:56.480
<v Speaker 1>Uh.

0:15:56.520 --> 0:15:58.840
<v Speaker 3>They had playmakers of some of these wide out spots

0:15:59.080 --> 0:16:01.400
<v Speaker 3>and they really let those guys rip. But this offense

0:16:01.560 --> 0:16:03.200
<v Speaker 3>is I mean, he's going to get to the NFL

0:16:03.240 --> 0:16:05.240
<v Speaker 3>and be like, are you kidding me? All this structural

0:16:05.240 --> 0:16:07.480
<v Speaker 3>stuff could help me. I mean, no play action. There's

0:16:07.600 --> 0:16:10.280
<v Speaker 3>just so little in terms of what would aid him

0:16:10.480 --> 0:16:12.520
<v Speaker 3>as a quarterback other than just get it. There's a

0:16:12.520 --> 0:16:14.600
<v Speaker 3>place where he just gets the ball out quickly. But

0:16:14.680 --> 0:16:17.200
<v Speaker 3>in terms of downfield stuff, he created so much stuff

0:16:17.200 --> 0:16:19.720
<v Speaker 3>in the athletes. They had created so much stuff on

0:16:19.760 --> 0:16:21.400
<v Speaker 3>their own There just wasn't a lot of things that

0:16:21.480 --> 0:16:24.240
<v Speaker 3>helped them get to big stuff in their offense. It

0:16:24.320 --> 0:16:26.280
<v Speaker 3>was a lot of out of structure stuff and he

0:16:26.320 --> 0:16:28.320
<v Speaker 3>deserves credit for that. And some of the average time

0:16:28.320 --> 0:16:30.280
<v Speaker 3>to throw is that kind of stuff. Some of it

0:16:30.320 --> 0:16:31.880
<v Speaker 3>is just like I'm not going to play on time,

0:16:31.960 --> 0:16:34.560
<v Speaker 3>like I'm playing my way, I'm making a play and

0:16:34.720 --> 0:16:36.320
<v Speaker 3>I just the biggest thing to me is if he

0:16:36.480 --> 0:16:39.000
<v Speaker 3>was an unbelievable talent, I would be like, yeah, I'm

0:16:39.000 --> 0:16:40.680
<v Speaker 3>cool with that, like that, I can roll with that.

0:16:41.000 --> 0:16:43.520
<v Speaker 3>Because the arm, the ball just dies all the time

0:16:43.560 --> 0:16:47.240
<v Speaker 3>down the field, but not distance distance throws. People confuse armstraight, No,

0:16:47.320 --> 0:16:48.520
<v Speaker 3>he can't throw it far. As soon as he throws

0:16:48.520 --> 0:16:49.840
<v Speaker 3>it far in the NFL, people and be like they

0:16:49.840 --> 0:16:52.960
<v Speaker 3>were worried about his arm. This about velocity when we're

0:16:52.960 --> 0:16:55.840
<v Speaker 3>talking about armstrang and he drive the ball. And that's

0:16:55.880 --> 0:16:58.320
<v Speaker 3>what I think is really it just lacking on tape

0:16:58.320 --> 0:16:59.920
<v Speaker 3>all the time. And you wish it wasn't the case

0:17:00.360 --> 0:17:02.560
<v Speaker 3>because you really love the makeup of the player and

0:17:02.600 --> 0:17:04.960
<v Speaker 3>the toughness, his desire to put the team on his

0:17:05.040 --> 0:17:07.879
<v Speaker 3>back when he knew the system wasn't great. But I

0:17:08.000 --> 0:17:09.840
<v Speaker 3>just don't think the tools will translate to playing that

0:17:09.840 --> 0:17:11.119
<v Speaker 3>way in the NFL, and I don't know if he

0:17:11.119 --> 0:17:13.520
<v Speaker 3>can continue to play and the like. In the pro game.

0:17:13.560 --> 0:17:14.879
<v Speaker 3>They're gonna ask him to throw the middle of the

0:17:14.880 --> 0:17:18.160
<v Speaker 3>field on time of anticipation way more than this offense

0:17:18.200 --> 0:17:20.720
<v Speaker 3>did where he's playing outside the numbers a lot. That's

0:17:20.720 --> 0:17:22.320
<v Speaker 3>just kind of an unknowl Like, he didn't throw there

0:17:22.359 --> 0:17:24.240
<v Speaker 3>a lot, and so what is that going to look

0:17:24.280 --> 0:17:26.159
<v Speaker 3>like at the pro level when the offense he's in

0:17:26.760 --> 0:17:28.800
<v Speaker 3>has way more in terms of how it attacks the field,

0:17:28.840 --> 0:17:31.200
<v Speaker 3>So it's going to stress defenses way more. But I

0:17:31.200 --> 0:17:33.400
<v Speaker 3>think it's also gonna ask him to do some things

0:17:33.440 --> 0:17:34.600
<v Speaker 3>that we didn't see in college.

0:17:34.720 --> 0:17:37.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, the out of structure plays. You see the arm strength.

0:17:37.240 --> 0:17:39.439
<v Speaker 1>That is a huge difference when you're watching Ward in

0:17:39.560 --> 0:17:43.000
<v Speaker 1>him back to back, not that Ward is is Jordan

0:17:43.119 --> 0:17:45.840
<v Speaker 1>Love in terms of just pure arm strength. But it's

0:17:45.840 --> 0:17:48.240
<v Speaker 1>still a plus arm that gets it there. And you

0:17:48.280 --> 0:17:50.200
<v Speaker 1>do see the ball die. There's a lot of contested catches,

0:17:50.240 --> 0:17:53.679
<v Speaker 1>and that's from the pocket as well, whereas it's contested

0:17:53.760 --> 0:17:55.920
<v Speaker 1>and you're kind of thinking, well, if it was someone

0:17:55.920 --> 0:17:57.960
<v Speaker 1>else throwing, maybe it wouldn't be a contested catch a

0:17:58.000 --> 0:17:59.200
<v Speaker 1>lot of tight throws for Sudar.

0:17:59.480 --> 0:18:00.760
<v Speaker 2>And yet if you.

0:18:00.840 --> 0:18:04.920
<v Speaker 1>Told me Andy Dalton with swag, like is an outcome,

0:18:04.960 --> 0:18:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Like that's a good outcome for a late first round pick.

0:18:07.840 --> 0:18:11.680
<v Speaker 1>Andy Dalton's had an incredible with that hair. He does

0:18:11.760 --> 0:18:18.200
<v Speaker 1>have swag. Maybe early Andy Dallon, I should I should, right.

0:18:20.240 --> 0:18:23.040
<v Speaker 1>So I've heard stories because I worked with Andrew Hawkins

0:18:23.040 --> 0:18:27.600
<v Speaker 1>who was on those Bengals team, and he had aj Green,

0:18:27.840 --> 0:18:30.440
<v Speaker 1>and he had who else was on that was? Who's

0:18:30.760 --> 0:18:34.040
<v Speaker 1>Manzada on that t and Hawkins on that team, and

0:18:34.359 --> 0:18:36.479
<v Speaker 1>they all respected the hell out of Andy Dalton. They

0:18:36.480 --> 0:18:39.159
<v Speaker 1>all loved Dandy Dallton. So whether it was swag or not,

0:18:39.359 --> 0:18:41.760
<v Speaker 1>he was he was a leader that that was and

0:18:41.600 --> 0:18:43.119
<v Speaker 1>I and I think has got to give you that.

0:18:43.160 --> 0:18:46.160
<v Speaker 1>So like, look if we're feeling like that's a four,

0:18:46.240 --> 0:18:48.280
<v Speaker 1>But I don't think that's necessarily his floor. I think

0:18:48.280 --> 0:18:50.399
<v Speaker 1>it could go in a number of directions because of

0:18:50.440 --> 0:18:52.760
<v Speaker 1>those deep drops that you talked about with Camp two.

0:18:52.840 --> 0:18:55.280
<v Speaker 1>Last thing on Shoudre is just kind of who who

0:18:55.320 --> 0:18:57.280
<v Speaker 1>would you want to see him with. Let's say you're

0:18:58.160 --> 0:19:00.800
<v Speaker 1>you are in his family and you it's not about

0:19:00.840 --> 0:19:03.919
<v Speaker 1>the money in terms of the signing bonus. You just

0:19:04.160 --> 0:19:05.840
<v Speaker 1>you just think I want him to land with the

0:19:06.200 --> 0:19:09.320
<v Speaker 1>right system for him, Like is there a fit for

0:19:09.320 --> 0:19:11.320
<v Speaker 1>for him or a few fits out there that you like.

0:19:12.600 --> 0:19:16.280
<v Speaker 3>He's one that's it's multi layered right system wise to

0:19:16.359 --> 0:19:18.960
<v Speaker 3>would he work best with his one question? And then

0:19:19.080 --> 0:19:22.800
<v Speaker 3>personality wise, like would he work with the Giants?

0:19:23.480 --> 0:19:26.840
<v Speaker 1>Just because he's like a big personality.

0:19:26.880 --> 0:19:29.520
<v Speaker 3>I mean I think, yeah, I think he's a big personality.

0:19:29.520 --> 0:19:31.879
<v Speaker 3>I think he's his own person like unique from a

0:19:31.920 --> 0:19:35.240
<v Speaker 3>personality perspective, where like Brian Dable, like what is he

0:19:35.359 --> 0:19:36.879
<v Speaker 3>is he going to be able to roll with? Like

0:19:36.960 --> 0:19:39.600
<v Speaker 3>who Sanders is and just the way he communicates and

0:19:39.680 --> 0:19:41.480
<v Speaker 3>all those sorts of things, Like I actually think of

0:19:41.520 --> 0:19:43.840
<v Speaker 3>it as a positive for Sanders. I but I think

0:19:43.920 --> 0:19:46.359
<v Speaker 3>the fit matters because he isn't just your you're And

0:19:46.480 --> 0:19:48.120
<v Speaker 3>this is a good thing I think, and it can

0:19:48.160 --> 0:19:50.840
<v Speaker 3>be a really good thing a traditional mold at this position.

0:19:51.240 --> 0:19:52.560
<v Speaker 3>Will dab will be able to roll with that? I

0:19:52.560 --> 0:19:53.560
<v Speaker 3>don't know. Maybe he will, and.

0:19:53.680 --> 0:19:55.320
<v Speaker 2>He'd better be his careers on the line.

0:19:55.359 --> 0:19:57.240
<v Speaker 1>He's had a lot of quarterbacks, to be fair to

0:19:57.280 --> 0:20:00.240
<v Speaker 1>Brian Dabele, going back to college, going back to Tom

0:20:00.280 --> 0:20:02.399
<v Speaker 1>Brady if you want to and Josh, you know, you

0:20:02.520 --> 0:20:04.760
<v Speaker 1>got to think if they took him, they'd have the

0:20:04.800 --> 0:20:07.120
<v Speaker 1>conviction that they're that they're going to make that work.

0:20:07.160 --> 0:20:08.840
<v Speaker 1>And I think it's not like Shitter isn't gonna want

0:20:08.840 --> 0:20:11.919
<v Speaker 1>to be coach start or anything like that. So personalityway

0:20:11.920 --> 0:20:14.120
<v Speaker 1>wasn't less worried. It's more just like does that fit

0:20:14.840 --> 0:20:15.680
<v Speaker 1>or where would he fit?

0:20:16.320 --> 0:20:18.160
<v Speaker 3>Yeah? I think, I mean Pittsburgh's an interesting one that's

0:20:18.200 --> 0:20:20.640
<v Speaker 3>been talked about a lot. I think from a personality perspective,

0:20:20.680 --> 0:20:22.440
<v Speaker 3>that's a great fit. That's hard for me to say

0:20:22.480 --> 0:20:26.159
<v Speaker 3>anybody like Arthur Smith's offense would be very different for

0:20:26.240 --> 0:20:28.960
<v Speaker 3>him from what he's run at Colorado.

0:20:29.040 --> 0:20:29.200
<v Speaker 1>Now.

0:20:29.240 --> 0:20:31.399
<v Speaker 3>I think anything's going to be different, but that offense

0:20:31.440 --> 0:20:33.119
<v Speaker 3>would require him to go under center. He would have

0:20:33.160 --> 0:20:35.120
<v Speaker 3>to adjust to a lot of things. There's a lot

0:20:35.119 --> 0:20:37.239
<v Speaker 3>of play action, a lot of shots like there are

0:20:37.240 --> 0:20:39.600
<v Speaker 3>some things that could maybe work, but it would be

0:20:39.640 --> 0:20:42.359
<v Speaker 3>a learning curve for him in some ways. Stefanski is

0:20:42.400 --> 0:20:44.720
<v Speaker 3>one that I think in Cleveland would be interesting. He's

0:20:45.080 --> 0:20:47.920
<v Speaker 3>kind of remade his offense a lot of different times,

0:20:48.119 --> 0:20:51.119
<v Speaker 3>a lot of different ways for different players, So he

0:20:51.200 --> 0:20:53.360
<v Speaker 3>has shown the desire to be flexible and me kind

0:20:53.359 --> 0:20:55.640
<v Speaker 3>of meet who players are now. None of that worked

0:20:55.640 --> 0:20:58.560
<v Speaker 3>with Sean Watson, and maybe mostly because he wasn't the

0:20:58.560 --> 0:21:00.440
<v Speaker 3>player that he once was, so not the thing was

0:21:00.480 --> 0:21:03.480
<v Speaker 3>going to work. But with Sanders, I think there is

0:21:03.560 --> 0:21:05.919
<v Speaker 3>that ad layer of like, Okay, if this player is

0:21:05.960 --> 0:21:08.080
<v Speaker 3>willing to buy in here and be a part of

0:21:08.080 --> 0:21:10.639
<v Speaker 3>what we're doing, we'll change and we'll adapt the offense

0:21:10.680 --> 0:21:12.439
<v Speaker 3>to fit like sort of things that he wants. So

0:21:12.920 --> 0:21:14.840
<v Speaker 3>that's an interesting one to me. I don't think he's

0:21:14.880 --> 0:21:16.920
<v Speaker 3>gonna go it too to Cleveland. I'm not exactly sure

0:21:16.920 --> 0:21:19.840
<v Speaker 3>where he's gonna go. Before the Raiders got Gino Smith,

0:21:19.880 --> 0:21:22.520
<v Speaker 3>I was actually kind of interested in that potential fit

0:21:22.600 --> 0:21:25.119
<v Speaker 3>because I think he and Pete's personalities would also be

0:21:25.280 --> 0:21:27.840
<v Speaker 3>really fun together and I would kind of love to

0:21:27.840 --> 0:21:29.159
<v Speaker 3>see that. I have no idea how would go with

0:21:29.200 --> 0:21:31.440
<v Speaker 3>Chip Kelly or what chip Kelly's even gonna run in

0:21:31.480 --> 0:21:34.679
<v Speaker 3>the NFL, But so there's some interesting ones maybe, But

0:21:35.320 --> 0:21:38.199
<v Speaker 3>I do think Cleveland, if it happens, maybe later in

0:21:38.240 --> 0:21:40.440
<v Speaker 3>the draft. Like you say he's gonna go first Hunt,

0:21:40.680 --> 0:21:43.119
<v Speaker 3>I think he will, but I'm maybe it's a trade

0:21:43.119 --> 0:21:45.719
<v Speaker 3>back in I'm not totally convinced that there's a lot

0:21:45.760 --> 0:21:47.960
<v Speaker 3>of teams that need him or value him. Maybe in

0:21:47.960 --> 0:21:49.439
<v Speaker 3>the first round. Could he be the first pick in

0:21:49.480 --> 0:21:52.200
<v Speaker 3>the second round? I mean, I would be interesting. Maybe unlikely,

0:21:52.280 --> 0:21:53.000
<v Speaker 3>but it's possible.

0:21:54.000 --> 0:21:55.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't know why. I think the Rams are the floor.

0:21:56.640 --> 0:21:58.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, there's no way to know what the Rams

0:21:58.760 --> 0:22:02.640
<v Speaker 1>are really thinking. I think he would. I think they're

0:22:02.680 --> 0:22:07.560
<v Speaker 1>in the quarterback market in this draft class, and whether

0:22:07.600 --> 0:22:10.600
<v Speaker 1>that's at twenty six or they have to move up.

0:22:10.640 --> 0:22:12.400
<v Speaker 1>They've like moving up, but it's going to be tough

0:22:12.400 --> 0:22:13.920
<v Speaker 1>for them to do so they gave up an extra

0:22:14.040 --> 0:22:16.760
<v Speaker 1>they're missing a pick. They would be quite a luxury

0:22:16.800 --> 0:22:20.720
<v Speaker 1>pick there at twenty six, but I could see it happening,

0:22:21.000 --> 0:22:23.119
<v Speaker 1>and I think it'd be an interesting fit in that system.

0:22:23.160 --> 0:22:25.119
<v Speaker 1>Let's take a quick break and we've broken down the

0:22:25.119 --> 0:22:26.920
<v Speaker 1>top two and we'll get into the rest of the

0:22:27.000 --> 0:22:28.240
<v Speaker 1>quarterbacks right after this.

0:22:35.880 --> 0:22:37.160
<v Speaker 2>Back on NFL Daily.

0:22:36.960 --> 0:22:40.359
<v Speaker 1>And yeah, looking at John here, it does remind me

0:22:40.400 --> 0:22:44.760
<v Speaker 1>of that Tight Ends ranking show, which in my head

0:22:44.800 --> 0:22:46.520
<v Speaker 1>at the time was going to be the first of

0:22:46.600 --> 0:22:51.600
<v Speaker 1>like an off season positional ranking show on around the NFL,

0:22:51.600 --> 0:22:54.280
<v Speaker 1>and unfortunately that didn't happen.

0:22:55.600 --> 0:22:57.480
<v Speaker 3>All my friends remind me all the time that I

0:22:57.560 --> 0:22:58.600
<v Speaker 3>ruined everything.

0:22:58.840 --> 0:23:01.000
<v Speaker 2>No, we had nothing to do with John Ledyard.

0:23:01.040 --> 0:23:03.119
<v Speaker 1>Maybe we'll do it again though in terms of the

0:23:03.200 --> 0:23:06.439
<v Speaker 1>NFL daily off season programming. But I'm locked in on

0:23:06.480 --> 0:23:08.840
<v Speaker 1>the draft while I have you on the show, though,

0:23:09.040 --> 0:23:12.439
<v Speaker 1>I do like, you know, taking us off track a

0:23:12.480 --> 0:23:16.440
<v Speaker 1>little bit. You do follow the Steelers pretty close, and

0:23:16.560 --> 0:23:20.320
<v Speaker 1>you just talked about Arthur Smith, like who would really

0:23:20.359 --> 0:23:21.840
<v Speaker 1>fit in Arthur Smith offense?

0:23:21.880 --> 0:23:23.919
<v Speaker 2>And I do feel like there's a.

0:23:25.400 --> 0:23:30.240
<v Speaker 1>Dichotomy between maybe how Arthur Smith gets talked about sometimes nationally,

0:23:30.400 --> 0:23:35.159
<v Speaker 1>like he's still skating on some of those Titans offenses,

0:23:35.200 --> 0:23:37.240
<v Speaker 1>which now are like a little bit in the rear

0:23:37.320 --> 0:23:40.480
<v Speaker 1>view mirror, and like, what is Arthur Smith really in

0:23:40.560 --> 0:23:43.320
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty five as someone that's that's breaking down the

0:23:43.320 --> 0:23:46.040
<v Speaker 1>Steelers Because you do it on audibles and analytics, it's

0:23:46.080 --> 0:23:48.480
<v Speaker 1>your substack, and you do that with Ali it's a

0:23:48.480 --> 0:23:50.800
<v Speaker 1>great podcast, but you also do extra coverage on your

0:23:50.800 --> 0:23:53.640
<v Speaker 1>own on the Steelers. So I am I'm curious where

0:23:53.640 --> 0:23:57.080
<v Speaker 1>are we in the Arthur Smith experience because I'm getting

0:23:57.280 --> 0:23:58.600
<v Speaker 1>more dubious by the year.

0:23:58.800 --> 0:24:00.880
<v Speaker 2>I will say that, yeah.

0:24:00.680 --> 0:24:03.320
<v Speaker 3>He's just not very good or very modern. I think

0:24:03.440 --> 0:24:05.200
<v Speaker 3>is part of the problem, like that, you know, that's

0:24:05.200 --> 0:24:07.280
<v Speaker 3>the thing. He thinks that the things he did in

0:24:07.280 --> 0:24:10.560
<v Speaker 3>twenty nineteen are going to really succeed still in today's NFL,

0:24:10.600 --> 0:24:13.120
<v Speaker 3>and it just changes too quickly, Like everything he's doing

0:24:13.160 --> 0:24:16.399
<v Speaker 3>is outdated. I would even say it that tig it

0:24:16.440 --> 0:24:18.719
<v Speaker 3>was close to being god like he had Derick Henry,

0:24:18.760 --> 0:24:20.840
<v Speaker 3>like that's what he had and that guy was awesome,

0:24:21.080 --> 0:24:22.400
<v Speaker 3>and they had some other thing. I mean, I think

0:24:22.440 --> 0:24:24.800
<v Speaker 3>he I think they did a good job with what

0:24:24.840 --> 0:24:27.320
<v Speaker 3>they had. But yeah, I mean that's not an offense

0:24:27.320 --> 0:24:29.720
<v Speaker 3>that anybody's thinking, oh, you should replicate that in twenty

0:24:29.760 --> 0:24:32.040
<v Speaker 3>twenty five, and he's thinking that, like that's what he

0:24:32.040 --> 0:24:35.280
<v Speaker 3>wants to replicate. So you know, the early down runs

0:24:35.320 --> 0:24:37.320
<v Speaker 3>and lots of first down runs. He's the second and

0:24:37.359 --> 0:24:39.800
<v Speaker 3>long run guy. The play sequencing is an issue, and

0:24:39.840 --> 0:24:42.080
<v Speaker 3>then I think the passing offense. Honestly, he gets ver

0:24:42.600 --> 0:24:44.679
<v Speaker 3>he gets heralded is a run game guy. But the

0:24:44.760 --> 0:24:46.680
<v Speaker 3>run games have been bad for years. If you look

0:24:46.760 --> 0:24:48.000
<v Speaker 3>ep A per play.

0:24:47.880 --> 0:24:50.760
<v Speaker 1>Right, That's that's where my basic mind looks at. It's

0:24:50.760 --> 0:24:52.680
<v Speaker 1>like the run game isn't happening. He had the people

0:24:52.680 --> 0:24:54.720
<v Speaker 1>to do it even in Atlanta. Wasn't happening to the

0:24:54.960 --> 0:24:58.199
<v Speaker 1>consistency that you would have wanted to, right, That's absolutely right.

0:24:58.240 --> 0:25:00.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm curious who would fit I think would fit with that.

0:25:00.760 --> 0:25:02.560
<v Speaker 1>That quarterback to me like, he's a guy that wants

0:25:02.600 --> 0:25:04.160
<v Speaker 1>to go under center. He wants to run play action.

0:25:04.240 --> 0:25:05.880
<v Speaker 1>He wants to rely on that part of it, which

0:25:05.920 --> 0:25:07.800
<v Speaker 1>actually don't hate that part of it. I wish the

0:25:07.840 --> 0:25:09.920
<v Speaker 1>play action was more threatening in terms of attack in

0:25:09.960 --> 0:25:12.120
<v Speaker 1>the middle of the field, perhaps with a different quarterback.

0:25:12.119 --> 0:25:14.280
<v Speaker 1>It would be first guy that comes to mind, obviously

0:25:14.280 --> 0:25:16.240
<v Speaker 1>in this class. I think Will Howard would be really

0:25:16.240 --> 0:25:19.560
<v Speaker 1>interesting to him. There would be some developmental stuff with

0:25:19.600 --> 0:25:22.119
<v Speaker 1>other guys. I mean, but Jackson Dart and Will Howard

0:25:22.119 --> 0:25:24.840
<v Speaker 1>are both guys that I think could be guys that

0:25:24.880 --> 0:25:27.200
<v Speaker 1>if you're just saying who's the fit right now without

0:25:27.240 --> 0:25:29.600
<v Speaker 1>needing a lot of molding or changing, both of those

0:25:29.600 --> 0:25:30.320
<v Speaker 1>guys make sense.

0:25:30.359 --> 0:25:32.000
<v Speaker 3>Have gone under center a little bit. There's some play

0:25:32.000 --> 0:25:34.720
<v Speaker 3>action ability to them. They sort of have the thing

0:25:34.880 --> 0:25:37.000
<v Speaker 3>with things that he looks for from a trades perspective.

0:25:37.320 --> 0:25:38.520
<v Speaker 3>He wants to be able to get the ball out

0:25:38.520 --> 0:25:40.720
<v Speaker 3>on the field. Will Howard is not a big armed guy.

0:25:40.960 --> 0:25:43.040
<v Speaker 3>He threw the deep ball really well last year, and

0:25:43.080 --> 0:25:46.200
<v Speaker 3>so and I think both are guys. Dart is a

0:25:46.200 --> 0:25:48.040
<v Speaker 3>little bit more interesting. We could talk more about him

0:25:48.040 --> 0:25:49.639
<v Speaker 3>in a second. But I think Howard's a guy at

0:25:49.720 --> 0:25:51.080
<v Speaker 3>least that if he was there in the third round

0:25:51.080 --> 0:25:52.760
<v Speaker 3>that he would see is this guy will do what

0:25:52.800 --> 0:25:55.199
<v Speaker 3>I tell him to do. And Russ didn't necessarily do

0:25:55.280 --> 0:25:57.240
<v Speaker 3>that last year all the time, and I think, you know,

0:25:57.280 --> 0:25:59.040
<v Speaker 3>there's always tedgy with people arouse. I don't know how

0:25:59.080 --> 0:26:01.960
<v Speaker 3>much that's overblown. Fields did and he liked Fields, but

0:26:02.000 --> 0:26:05.919
<v Speaker 3>Fields like wasn't capable, Like, he wasn't comfortable, he wasn't consistent,

0:26:06.280 --> 0:26:07.800
<v Speaker 3>and so I think he's looking for somebody who can

0:26:07.840 --> 0:26:11.480
<v Speaker 3>do those things consistently and follow his modeled approach. Hilarious

0:26:11.480 --> 0:26:13.000
<v Speaker 3>that they're looking at Aaron Rodgers.

0:26:12.680 --> 0:26:14.800
<v Speaker 1>Right, I was gonna say, if you're looking for someone

0:26:14.880 --> 0:26:18.760
<v Speaker 1>to do what is told Aaron Rodgers and Arthur Smith,

0:26:18.920 --> 0:26:21.920
<v Speaker 1>that could be fun. I mean, they've both been paid

0:26:21.960 --> 0:26:24.960
<v Speaker 1>contributors to McAfee. They've got that in common. They're both

0:26:25.000 --> 0:26:27.639
<v Speaker 1>a little salty. It would be fun. Just from a

0:26:28.040 --> 0:26:31.080
<v Speaker 1>content perspective. I'd be into that. And yes, Will Howard

0:26:31.119 --> 0:26:33.480
<v Speaker 1>the Ohio State quarterback who will probably go in the

0:26:33.480 --> 0:26:37.000
<v Speaker 1>middle rounds somewhere. His old coordinator, Chip Kelly is with

0:26:37.080 --> 0:26:39.680
<v Speaker 1>the Raiders, so that's a connection that has been made

0:26:39.680 --> 0:26:41.960
<v Speaker 1>and probably about the point in the draft where they'd

0:26:42.400 --> 0:26:45.920
<v Speaker 1>think about taking a quarterback there. Let's talk Dart and

0:26:46.640 --> 0:26:49.960
<v Speaker 1>maybe Howard too. But you mentioned Arthur Smith still trying

0:26:49.960 --> 0:26:53.399
<v Speaker 1>to recreate the ideas that worked for him, like so

0:26:54.000 --> 0:26:56.120
<v Speaker 1>well back six or seven years. That's like a life

0:26:56.200 --> 0:27:00.360
<v Speaker 1>lesson thing too, like a there are authors that have

0:27:02.080 --> 0:27:04.479
<v Speaker 1>two or three great books in them but that's all

0:27:04.480 --> 0:27:07.240
<v Speaker 1>they have, or just even one great book in them,

0:27:07.560 --> 0:27:09.600
<v Speaker 1>and that's all that have, and to me, it doesn't

0:27:09.680 --> 0:27:14.600
<v Speaker 1>diminish how great that book was. And there's actors too

0:27:14.680 --> 0:27:17.120
<v Speaker 1>that they have like a moment in time where they

0:27:17.240 --> 0:27:21.320
<v Speaker 1>do what they did and it works amazingly for three

0:27:21.320 --> 0:27:23.159
<v Speaker 1>to five years, but they're not going to go do

0:27:23.359 --> 0:27:26.920
<v Speaker 1>anything else. And maybe maybe that is Arthur Smith a

0:27:26.960 --> 0:27:28.480
<v Speaker 1>little bit. If you want to be a great all

0:27:28.560 --> 0:27:31.879
<v Speaker 1>time coach, you have to be like Kyle shannoner McVeigh

0:27:31.920 --> 0:27:34.359
<v Speaker 1>that within the box of what they do, or Belichick

0:27:34.440 --> 0:27:38.480
<v Speaker 1>is always changing. The NFL is an evolutionary league. It

0:27:38.560 --> 0:27:40.680
<v Speaker 1>is always changing. I think you guys do a really

0:27:40.760 --> 0:27:44.080
<v Speaker 1>great job, you and Ali pointing how the league is

0:27:44.240 --> 0:27:46.520
<v Speaker 1>changing on your podcast. But I don't know, Maybe Arthur

0:27:46.520 --> 0:27:48.240
<v Speaker 1>Smith doesn't have a great second book.

0:27:48.920 --> 0:27:51.600
<v Speaker 3>No, it's a good point. I think that could be true.

0:27:51.600 --> 0:27:54.040
<v Speaker 3>In keeping with your analogy, maybe Derrick Henry was the

0:27:54.040 --> 0:27:56.720
<v Speaker 3>star actor and Arthur Smith was the supporting action.

0:27:56.760 --> 0:28:00.359
<v Speaker 1>Sure, maybe, sure, Pek Dereck Henry is a good place

0:28:00.440 --> 0:28:03.280
<v Speaker 1>to start. Although it's certainly it was working and right.

0:28:03.320 --> 0:28:05.359
<v Speaker 1>You know, I always have a soft spot for him

0:28:05.359 --> 0:28:07.640
<v Speaker 1>because I always thought Ryan Tannehill in the right system

0:28:08.280 --> 0:28:09.880
<v Speaker 1>was going to have a good career, and it took

0:28:09.960 --> 0:28:12.000
<v Speaker 1>Arthur Smith to actually make it happen. So I thank

0:28:12.119 --> 0:28:15.119
<v Speaker 1>Arthur for that. Let's talk Jackson Dart. Let's talk to

0:28:15.280 --> 0:28:20.920
<v Speaker 1>Jackson Dart. Okay, there's been coms to like a jail

0:28:21.000 --> 0:28:23.959
<v Speaker 1>and hurt. The thing about Dart and I put this

0:28:24.000 --> 0:28:28.000
<v Speaker 1>to Daniel Jeremiah last week, but I'll put it to

0:28:28.000 --> 0:28:30.320
<v Speaker 1>you too, Like there is a lot of projection there

0:28:30.320 --> 0:28:32.520
<v Speaker 1>because what you don't see from him is some of

0:28:32.520 --> 0:28:35.680
<v Speaker 1>the stuff you see from cam Ward and Shular Sanders,

0:28:35.680 --> 0:28:40.320
<v Speaker 1>which is real quarterbacking. Like it it is just the

0:28:40.560 --> 0:28:41.960
<v Speaker 1>things that they're going to ask him to do at

0:28:42.000 --> 0:28:44.360
<v Speaker 1>the pro level in terms of going through his reads

0:28:44.360 --> 0:28:46.240
<v Speaker 1>and anticipation in the middle of the field.

0:28:46.560 --> 0:28:48.760
<v Speaker 2>There's not like a ton of that on his tape.

0:28:48.800 --> 0:28:51.560
<v Speaker 1>So how do you when you're making the evaluation, work

0:28:51.640 --> 0:28:53.840
<v Speaker 1>that into how you see him projecting forward?

0:28:54.880 --> 0:28:58.280
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, an offense to found space a lot in ill

0:28:58.280 --> 0:29:02.080
<v Speaker 3>miss spread offense ares lots of that kind of stuff.

0:29:02.840 --> 0:29:04.840
<v Speaker 3>You know. Pro defenses are a lot better at just

0:29:04.880 --> 0:29:08.520
<v Speaker 3>attacking and eliminating offenses like that, especially from pressure perspective,

0:29:08.840 --> 0:29:11.600
<v Speaker 3>which they struggled with. Honestly, it almost too dark gets

0:29:11.680 --> 0:29:14.719
<v Speaker 3>crushed a lot tons of mocks. Even this guy, I mean,

0:29:14.760 --> 0:29:17.200
<v Speaker 3>he will throw while he's about to get just destroyed.

0:29:17.560 --> 0:29:20.960
<v Speaker 3>All three of these top guys, like no issues with

0:29:21.040 --> 0:29:23.080
<v Speaker 3>them at all in terms of the toughness and the

0:29:23.120 --> 0:29:24.880
<v Speaker 3>ability to make a throw while they're about to get

0:29:24.920 --> 0:29:27.600
<v Speaker 3>cleaned out. Like, these guys are all pretty tough, made

0:29:27.640 --> 0:29:30.160
<v Speaker 3>of the right stuff mentally for sure, you know. So

0:29:30.200 --> 0:29:33.160
<v Speaker 3>the concern with Dart really is almost ultimated. People say

0:29:33.160 --> 0:29:35.320
<v Speaker 3>he's not an elite talent. I think his tape as

0:29:35.320 --> 0:29:37.479
<v Speaker 3>a passer reminds me a little bit of Justin Herbert

0:29:37.520 --> 0:29:40.080
<v Speaker 3>at Oregon who I did not find that impressive, to

0:29:40.120 --> 0:29:42.480
<v Speaker 3>be honest with you. I thought there were physical tools

0:29:42.480 --> 0:29:46.520
<v Speaker 3>and moments and throws, but consistency wise from a processing standpoint,

0:29:46.520 --> 0:29:48.840
<v Speaker 3>getting the ball out accuracy, Like I thought, there were

0:29:48.840 --> 0:29:50.240
<v Speaker 3>a lot of issues, and I see some of those

0:29:50.280 --> 0:29:53.080
<v Speaker 3>issues with Dart too. You know, I don't know whether

0:29:53.120 --> 0:29:55.800
<v Speaker 3>he'll make the jump that Herbert did at the next level.

0:29:55.840 --> 0:29:59.040
<v Speaker 3>I think that that doesn't happen with everybody, but the

0:30:00.520 --> 0:30:02.719
<v Speaker 3>because they were from the spread so often teams all, right,

0:30:02.720 --> 0:30:04.640
<v Speaker 3>get the ball out before we clean out, and sometimes

0:30:04.680 --> 0:30:08.280
<v Speaker 3>they did, sometimes they didn't. That made Dart speed up

0:30:08.320 --> 0:30:10.440
<v Speaker 3>a little bit. There's a lot of times in which

0:30:10.640 --> 0:30:13.800
<v Speaker 3>it's not necessarily playing fast. That maybe is the issue.

0:30:14.360 --> 0:30:17.000
<v Speaker 3>I think it's more playing smart that's the issue. When

0:30:17.080 --> 0:30:19.720
<v Speaker 3>the game script got to a point where he had

0:30:19.760 --> 0:30:22.680
<v Speaker 3>to be the guy, it got pretty rough at times.

0:30:22.720 --> 0:30:26.080
<v Speaker 3>So yeah, I'm a little bit scared of Jackson Dart

0:30:26.120 --> 0:30:28.880
<v Speaker 3>because I just wonder, from the neck up, if there's

0:30:29.040 --> 0:30:31.160
<v Speaker 3>enough right now to be able to win, Like he's

0:30:31.160 --> 0:30:32.280
<v Speaker 3>the kind of guy where it could get to the

0:30:32.360 --> 0:30:34.440
<v Speaker 3>league if teams haven't done their homework, or if they

0:30:34.440 --> 0:30:36.400
<v Speaker 3>haven't it just isn't the same on the board as

0:30:36.400 --> 0:30:37.760
<v Speaker 3>it is like when he gets in the in the

0:30:37.760 --> 0:30:40.440
<v Speaker 3>building and is out on the field. I just wonder

0:30:40.480 --> 0:30:42.320
<v Speaker 3>if it's gonna it could be too big for him

0:30:42.320 --> 0:30:44.400
<v Speaker 3>and it could just be too fast for him, and

0:30:44.440 --> 0:30:46.400
<v Speaker 3>I think that part could be paralyzing to him and

0:30:46.440 --> 0:30:47.880
<v Speaker 3>some of the decision and the end of the Florida

0:30:47.920 --> 0:30:50.360
<v Speaker 3>game is that it gets talked about, but it's legit

0:30:50.440 --> 0:30:52.200
<v Speaker 3>like he's playing well that old game. He's rolling as

0:30:52.240 --> 0:30:54.040
<v Speaker 3>soon as all right, you're the guy, go making drive,

0:30:54.040 --> 0:30:56.160
<v Speaker 3>go win us the game. It's ugly, Greg, I mean,

0:30:56.160 --> 0:30:57.800
<v Speaker 3>he's throwing the ball. The other team they dropped a

0:30:57.840 --> 0:31:00.560
<v Speaker 3>couple of picks, like it's everything just make some down

0:31:00.560 --> 0:31:03.360
<v Speaker 3>and falls apart. So you file those moments away. It's

0:31:03.360 --> 0:31:05.680
<v Speaker 3>not the whole evaluation, but you think of it certainly.

0:31:05.960 --> 0:31:07.600
<v Speaker 3>And I think he's I do think he's a good

0:31:07.600 --> 0:31:09.440
<v Speaker 3>athlete too, and that part of it is the Hurts

0:31:09.480 --> 0:31:12.520
<v Speaker 3>part that you mentioned. I think he can not a

0:31:12.640 --> 0:31:15.600
<v Speaker 3>explosive guy like Hurts isn't that explosive, but has the

0:31:15.640 --> 0:31:18.600
<v Speaker 3>ball carrying ability in the body armor. He's really stout

0:31:18.640 --> 0:31:21.000
<v Speaker 3>in terms of his build. So there's some interesting things

0:31:21.000 --> 0:31:23.280
<v Speaker 3>you can do with them. I'm not sure how long

0:31:23.400 --> 0:31:24.920
<v Speaker 3>or if it's in the cards for him to be

0:31:25.040 --> 0:31:26.120
<v Speaker 3>the guy for your team.

0:31:26.440 --> 0:31:29.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, unless you have a real vision for him. And

0:31:30.200 --> 0:31:32.240
<v Speaker 1>I hate to be like, hey, he's not for me

0:31:32.320 --> 0:31:35.080
<v Speaker 1>and then Sean McVay drafts him or something like that.

0:31:35.120 --> 0:31:39.640
<v Speaker 1>It's like, clearly you are gonna have a vision for

0:31:39.720 --> 0:31:41.920
<v Speaker 1>him if you take him. But him in particular, I

0:31:41.920 --> 0:31:43.640
<v Speaker 1>feel like you would have had to done a lot

0:31:43.680 --> 0:31:46.080
<v Speaker 1>of work with him in terms of the visits and

0:31:46.880 --> 0:31:50.360
<v Speaker 1>really understanding what he's seen, because you don't see it.

0:31:50.440 --> 0:31:52.480
<v Speaker 1>And I do knock him a little bit that he

0:31:52.600 --> 0:31:55.800
<v Speaker 1>was in that same system for three years, so I

0:31:55.840 --> 0:31:58.200
<v Speaker 1>want that. I want that thing to be mastered by

0:31:58.200 --> 0:32:01.120
<v Speaker 1>the end of it. I want you to feel extremely

0:32:01.240 --> 0:32:06.200
<v Speaker 1>comfortable and proficient and intelligent within that system by the

0:32:06.280 --> 0:32:08.840
<v Speaker 1>end of it. And that's where I'm not really in

0:32:08.920 --> 0:32:12.400
<v Speaker 1>on him. Whereas Shuder, You're saying, does he really have

0:32:12.480 --> 0:32:17.800
<v Speaker 1>the athleticism to make up for what, you know, the

0:32:17.960 --> 0:32:19.960
<v Speaker 1>style of play that he is And I get that,

0:32:20.040 --> 0:32:22.280
<v Speaker 1>but I think you can see enough from the neck

0:32:22.360 --> 0:32:25.240
<v Speaker 1>up that can I see him adjusting. I think Jackson

0:32:25.320 --> 0:32:27.840
<v Speaker 1>Dart is like that, but to a lesser degree because

0:32:27.880 --> 0:32:31.080
<v Speaker 1>he's obviously a good athlete. He's got some he's got

0:32:31.080 --> 0:32:33.360
<v Speaker 1>a good arm, Like it's easy cheese out there. Like

0:32:34.200 --> 0:32:36.080
<v Speaker 1>there's a couple of plays where he flips his hips

0:32:36.080 --> 0:32:37.640
<v Speaker 1>and he's running to the left, and you're like, oh,

0:32:37.680 --> 0:32:41.320
<v Speaker 1>that's awesome, that's great. But it's a lot of just

0:32:41.400 --> 0:32:44.160
<v Speaker 1>one read or else. And I guess if I'm going

0:32:44.200 --> 0:32:46.840
<v Speaker 1>to have one thing that I'm not gonna just project

0:32:46.880 --> 0:32:49.120
<v Speaker 1>totally forward, that's it because I don't see it. I'm

0:32:49.120 --> 0:32:51.680
<v Speaker 1>not smart enough at least from what we're doing, to

0:32:51.720 --> 0:32:54.600
<v Speaker 1>really project that forward. And so I think you'd have

0:32:54.680 --> 0:32:57.000
<v Speaker 1>to really get to the heart of like why he

0:32:57.040 --> 0:32:58.800
<v Speaker 1>did what he did, and that's stuff to do.

0:32:58.840 --> 0:32:59.680
<v Speaker 2>From where we're sitting.

0:33:00.720 --> 0:33:03.280
<v Speaker 3>His pocket positioning is really good and that gives me

0:33:03.320 --> 0:33:05.000
<v Speaker 3>some hope for him. Whereas the other two guys, I

0:33:05.040 --> 0:33:07.600
<v Speaker 3>think they drift around and they make things harder for

0:33:07.640 --> 0:33:09.440
<v Speaker 3>their lines at times because of where they are in

0:33:09.480 --> 0:33:12.000
<v Speaker 3>the pocket. I think Dart is pretty consistently in the

0:33:12.080 --> 0:33:14.280
<v Speaker 3>right spot in the pocket. He will move up when

0:33:14.320 --> 0:33:16.440
<v Speaker 3>he needs to. He actually is a pretty good feel

0:33:16.520 --> 0:33:19.680
<v Speaker 3>for pressure. Now. He's still despite that, ended up getting

0:33:19.680 --> 0:33:22.240
<v Speaker 3>sacked a lot, I think because he didn't know necessarily

0:33:22.240 --> 0:33:24.480
<v Speaker 3>where to go at the ball or the picture changed.

0:33:24.480 --> 0:33:26.720
<v Speaker 3>I think he knew pressure was coming. He turns, he

0:33:26.760 --> 0:33:28.320
<v Speaker 3>takes the ball with him like it's not like he's

0:33:28.360 --> 0:33:30.640
<v Speaker 3>surprised by the hit, but he just doesn't get it

0:33:30.680 --> 0:33:33.600
<v Speaker 3>out as much as he should. And so that's he's

0:33:33.640 --> 0:33:36.160
<v Speaker 3>over two years in a row with over nineteen percent

0:33:36.600 --> 0:33:39.160
<v Speaker 3>pressure to sack rates and very few throwaways if you

0:33:39.200 --> 0:33:40.600
<v Speaker 3>look at his amount of times he gets out and

0:33:40.640 --> 0:33:43.600
<v Speaker 3>throws it away compared to the other guys. So those

0:33:43.640 --> 0:33:45.400
<v Speaker 3>things are kind of where I say, like, I think

0:33:45.440 --> 0:33:49.680
<v Speaker 3>the bus potential year is high, because if you are

0:33:49.720 --> 0:33:52.440
<v Speaker 3>constantly taking sacks and you're not thinking fast enough to

0:33:52.440 --> 0:33:54.640
<v Speaker 3>get the ball out on time in the NFL, then

0:33:54.760 --> 0:33:57.000
<v Speaker 3>you're just gonna get benched, like or you're not ready

0:33:57.040 --> 0:33:59.600
<v Speaker 3>to play yet. So in a lot of RPOs in

0:33:59.600 --> 0:34:01.200
<v Speaker 3>this off and trade to a lot of stuff helping

0:34:01.240 --> 0:34:03.560
<v Speaker 3>him kind of get the ball, he has flashes of it.

0:34:03.640 --> 0:34:05.840
<v Speaker 3>There is a couple plays I think they had a

0:34:05.840 --> 0:34:09.160
<v Speaker 3>fourth down conversion against Florida where he goes one, two,

0:34:09.360 --> 0:34:12.759
<v Speaker 3>three and he hits a deep crosser for a tight

0:34:12.800 --> 0:34:14.960
<v Speaker 3>window for a big play, and it's like, man, like,

0:34:15.480 --> 0:34:17.760
<v Speaker 3>that's it, Like if you could just go, but he's

0:34:17.800 --> 0:34:20.239
<v Speaker 3>he that's so far the exception. He will stare down

0:34:20.320 --> 0:34:23.279
<v Speaker 3>guys and he will not move through. He'll look at

0:34:23.320 --> 0:34:25.239
<v Speaker 3>one side of the field only and forget about the

0:34:25.280 --> 0:34:27.879
<v Speaker 3>other side. And so I just think there's a long

0:34:27.960 --> 0:34:29.719
<v Speaker 3>way to go with him in terms of and maybe

0:34:29.719 --> 0:34:31.560
<v Speaker 3>not a long way to go, Like maybe it's happens

0:34:31.560 --> 0:34:34.160
<v Speaker 3>more naturally once he gets out of the ole miss

0:34:34.160 --> 0:34:37.000
<v Speaker 3>and he adds different coaching. But the fact that you,

0:34:37.040 --> 0:34:39.120
<v Speaker 3>as you said, it didn't happen yet gives me some

0:34:39.239 --> 0:34:40.640
<v Speaker 3>pause and some concern with him.

0:34:40.719 --> 0:34:43.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and the ball location is okay. It's the same

0:34:43.120 --> 0:34:46.239
<v Speaker 1>with Ward, it was just okay. Sometimes is a little off,

0:34:46.280 --> 0:34:48.319
<v Speaker 1>like he's always maybe it's just the timing where it

0:34:48.400 --> 0:34:50.480
<v Speaker 1>just feels like he's.

0:34:50.239 --> 0:34:51.959
<v Speaker 2>A beat late.

0:34:52.080 --> 0:34:54.239
<v Speaker 1>And when I was making the Sanders comparison, I was

0:34:54.320 --> 0:34:56.520
<v Speaker 1>kind of like, you need something to maybe make up

0:34:56.560 --> 0:34:59.319
<v Speaker 1>for this stuff, and everything seems good enough. He's not

0:34:59.400 --> 0:35:00.840
<v Speaker 1>Jalen hurts it as a runner. I mean, he's a

0:35:00.840 --> 0:35:04.440
<v Speaker 1>good runner, but he's not that brings us to Milroe. Okay,

0:35:04.480 --> 0:35:07.600
<v Speaker 1>So I've only watched so many quarterbacks here, and Jalen

0:35:07.600 --> 0:35:10.600
<v Speaker 1>Milroe would be my fourth of the ones that I watched.

0:35:10.880 --> 0:35:14.240
<v Speaker 1>And it's because if you put Jalen Milroe in the NFL,

0:35:14.280 --> 0:35:16.799
<v Speaker 1>well you are, We're putting him in the NFL. How

0:35:16.840 --> 0:35:22.200
<v Speaker 1>many quarterbacks in the NFL are better runners right now?

0:35:23.640 --> 0:35:24.120
<v Speaker 2>Right now?

0:35:24.560 --> 0:35:32.400
<v Speaker 3>Like if yeah, Lamar Jaden Daniels maybe is comfortably smaller,

0:35:32.520 --> 0:35:35.280
<v Speaker 3>so I mean you're more hired risk. Probably those guys

0:35:35.280 --> 0:35:38.520
<v Speaker 3>were awesome. I think he's better than Hurts already as

0:35:38.560 --> 0:35:38.960
<v Speaker 3>a runner.

0:35:38.960 --> 0:35:40.120
<v Speaker 2>I mean Josh Allen Is.

0:35:40.640 --> 0:35:43.239
<v Speaker 1>I often say that is Josh Allen run is the

0:35:43.280 --> 0:35:46.759
<v Speaker 1>most efficient play in football. But in terms of like

0:35:47.160 --> 0:35:52.640
<v Speaker 1>even Lamar Is is like step a lot slower maybe

0:35:52.640 --> 0:35:54.279
<v Speaker 1>than he was, although he kind of had it all

0:35:54.320 --> 0:35:54.879
<v Speaker 1>back this year.

0:35:54.920 --> 0:35:55.600
<v Speaker 2>I'm thinking more.

0:35:57.280 --> 0:36:00.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, So honestly, he might be like Jalen Miller oh

0:36:00.520 --> 0:36:03.040
<v Speaker 1>day one, might be the best riding quarterback in the NFL.

0:36:03.280 --> 0:36:06.080
<v Speaker 1>And damn Like that alone is enough for me to

0:36:06.160 --> 0:36:08.320
<v Speaker 1>like him better than any other quarterback that I've watched

0:36:08.400 --> 0:36:12.360
<v Speaker 1>in this class, cause like maybe we're like, could he

0:36:12.440 --> 0:36:14.399
<v Speaker 1>be a better version of Taysom Hill? I would take

0:36:14.440 --> 0:36:17.000
<v Speaker 1>that over maybe any other quarterback in this class. Just

0:36:17.080 --> 0:36:19.480
<v Speaker 1>that as a baseline. I don't think you should underrate that.

0:36:19.480 --> 0:36:22.960
<v Speaker 1>That is an amazing starting point, because my god, is

0:36:23.000 --> 0:36:25.719
<v Speaker 1>he a special runner and we can talk about the

0:36:26.200 --> 0:36:28.320
<v Speaker 1>drawbacks and it's why he's not gonna get taken in

0:36:28.360 --> 0:36:31.400
<v Speaker 1>the first round. Where look, if his season had ended

0:36:31.480 --> 0:36:34.200
<v Speaker 1>John after the first four games of the season because

0:36:34.200 --> 0:36:34.560
<v Speaker 1>he got.

0:36:34.480 --> 0:36:36.400
<v Speaker 2>Hurt or something like, where would he go?

0:36:36.480 --> 0:36:38.120
<v Speaker 1>Do you think, by the way, like just answer that

0:36:38.239 --> 0:36:41.200
<v Speaker 1>thought experiment, would he be a first round to pick? Then?

0:36:42.440 --> 0:36:45.480
<v Speaker 3>I don't think so, just because of the vetting process.

0:36:45.520 --> 0:36:47.480
<v Speaker 3>I think the wards so people get excited about him

0:36:47.480 --> 0:36:49.480
<v Speaker 3>as a college player, and I think there's reason to

0:36:49.560 --> 0:36:51.560
<v Speaker 3>be excited about him in the NFL too, But I

0:36:51.640 --> 0:36:53.799
<v Speaker 3>wonder if the process would still bring out some of

0:36:53.800 --> 0:36:55.719
<v Speaker 3>the warts in his game. And at the end of

0:36:55.760 --> 0:36:58.279
<v Speaker 3>the day, teams once it's easy in the moment to

0:36:58.280 --> 0:37:00.400
<v Speaker 3>get caught of me, Oh this guy's excited again, then

0:37:00.560 --> 0:37:02.040
<v Speaker 3>teams have to be like, hold on a second. This

0:37:02.040 --> 0:37:05.080
<v Speaker 3>guy had the highest like in the nation, like basically

0:37:05.160 --> 0:37:08.640
<v Speaker 3>uncatchable throw rate, and like even like some of the

0:37:08.640 --> 0:37:09.440
<v Speaker 3>passing stuff is.

0:37:09.520 --> 0:37:11.120
<v Speaker 2>Okay, give me the other side of it, give me

0:37:11.160 --> 0:37:12.880
<v Speaker 2>the other side of it. Then let's give me the

0:37:12.880 --> 0:37:13.880
<v Speaker 2>other Yeah.

0:37:13.920 --> 0:37:15.440
<v Speaker 3>I mean he is like he is truly one of

0:37:15.480 --> 0:37:17.680
<v Speaker 3>the most unbelievable athletes in the league at this position.

0:37:17.760 --> 0:37:19.520
<v Speaker 3>And the size too. In the leadership too. I mean that,

0:37:19.560 --> 0:37:22.440
<v Speaker 3>I think that the intangibles are great too. However, Yeah,

0:37:22.200 --> 0:37:26.440
<v Speaker 3>the accuracy stuff is a real concern. He did play

0:37:26.440 --> 0:37:28.520
<v Speaker 3>the position faster this year. I don't know if he

0:37:28.560 --> 0:37:31.080
<v Speaker 3>played it better. In fact, he maybe didn't, and so

0:37:31.160 --> 0:37:33.719
<v Speaker 3>maybe that's more of a concern. But he, I mean,

0:37:33.760 --> 0:37:35.759
<v Speaker 3>he really improved time to throw in some of those

0:37:35.800 --> 0:37:38.200
<v Speaker 3>sorts of things. The actress, he was still an issue

0:37:38.239 --> 0:37:40.600
<v Speaker 3>I think at different levels of the field. Also, just

0:37:41.160 --> 0:37:43.520
<v Speaker 3>the fundamentally the way he manages the pocket, the way

0:37:43.560 --> 0:37:46.560
<v Speaker 3>he manages the game is really sporadic. It's hard to

0:37:46.600 --> 0:37:49.440
<v Speaker 3>be to feel like you have a reliable sense of

0:37:49.480 --> 0:37:51.560
<v Speaker 3>what he's going to do in a given player, given situation.

0:37:51.920 --> 0:37:54.960
<v Speaker 3>So I think he's difficult to coach, especially at a

0:37:55.040 --> 0:37:56.560
<v Speaker 3>level where coaches are gonna be like, this is what

0:37:56.600 --> 0:37:58.799
<v Speaker 3>we do do it for the most part, not maybe

0:37:58.840 --> 0:38:02.319
<v Speaker 3>not all the mocking him to Pittsburgh thing that's very

0:38:02.360 --> 0:38:04.520
<v Speaker 3>common right now, did he meet with them? Who's in

0:38:04.600 --> 0:38:06.880
<v Speaker 3>that meeting? All that kind stuff like that's happening with

0:38:06.960 --> 0:38:09.200
<v Speaker 3>him right now. Like it's really funny because it would

0:38:09.200 --> 0:38:11.839
<v Speaker 3>be such a Tomlin pick, like I loves the personality

0:38:11.840 --> 0:38:13.640
<v Speaker 3>of the player, like and that's kind of stuff Tomlin

0:38:13.640 --> 0:38:15.799
<v Speaker 3>gravitates for it. It'd be such a funny fit in

0:38:15.840 --> 0:38:18.680
<v Speaker 3>the offense. So everybody's trying to figure out where he goes.

0:38:18.719 --> 0:38:20.200
<v Speaker 3>The reason we keep bringing up the same couple of

0:38:20.200 --> 0:38:21.840
<v Speaker 3>teams is there really are only a couple of teams

0:38:21.840 --> 0:38:24.040
<v Speaker 3>that need a quarterback. So it's probably gonna be a

0:38:24.080 --> 0:38:26.440
<v Speaker 3>surprise team that takes a couple of these guys. But

0:38:26.719 --> 0:38:28.759
<v Speaker 3>teams really feel like, yeah, this class week, Bren don't

0:38:28.760 --> 0:38:30.000
<v Speaker 3>get who we want or we're not get a guy

0:38:30.000 --> 0:38:32.080
<v Speaker 3>who can play. So I think he could go to

0:38:32.160 --> 0:38:34.959
<v Speaker 3>any team because it's just sort of like a raw

0:38:35.040 --> 0:38:37.440
<v Speaker 3>canvas in terms of what you're working with and his

0:38:37.520 --> 0:38:39.359
<v Speaker 3>approach I think is going to be really good, and

0:38:39.840 --> 0:38:42.200
<v Speaker 3>you know, the Alabama thing plus the personality I think

0:38:42.560 --> 0:38:45.040
<v Speaker 3>is everybody's Could he could he be our Jalen Hurt

0:38:45.120 --> 0:38:47.160
<v Speaker 3>some more explosive? You know? Could that be the case?

0:38:47.200 --> 0:38:49.960
<v Speaker 3>And that's probably the best case scenario.

0:38:50.000 --> 0:38:51.919
<v Speaker 1>I'd say maybe for I mean that, yeah, that would

0:38:51.960 --> 0:38:54.160
<v Speaker 1>be that would be incredible. I mean, he he is

0:38:54.200 --> 0:38:56.319
<v Speaker 1>a next level athlete, and so I have a friend

0:38:56.360 --> 0:38:58.279
<v Speaker 1>Ada Adam West, who you guys know if you listen

0:38:58.280 --> 0:39:01.000
<v Speaker 1>to the show that Saints Block Party podcast. And by

0:39:01.040 --> 0:39:04.000
<v Speaker 1>the way, he's been pumping up like dart to the Saints,

0:39:04.080 --> 0:39:06.120
<v Speaker 1>like he would be excited about that, and they would

0:39:06.120 --> 0:39:10.040
<v Speaker 1>be excited about that. I'm not liking that for anyone involved.

0:39:10.080 --> 0:39:11.640
<v Speaker 1>But he was like, you're gonna love Milrow when you

0:39:11.680 --> 0:39:14.000
<v Speaker 1>watch them, and of course I do, because how can

0:39:14.040 --> 0:39:17.680
<v Speaker 1>you not be exciting watching him? And the thing I

0:39:17.680 --> 0:39:20.040
<v Speaker 1>would just push back slightly on the passing, which is

0:39:20.160 --> 0:39:21.640
<v Speaker 1>it's pretty erratic, it's pretty rare.

0:39:21.920 --> 0:39:23.880
<v Speaker 2>There were legitimate spots.

0:39:23.520 --> 0:39:26.640
<v Speaker 1>In his career where he had to make throws to

0:39:26.719 --> 0:39:30.879
<v Speaker 1>win games and he made him. And so like, he's

0:39:30.960 --> 0:39:33.320
<v Speaker 1>not gonna be a plus plus thrower and that's maybe

0:39:33.360 --> 0:39:36.400
<v Speaker 1>gonna like limit his ceiling. But there were third and

0:39:36.560 --> 0:39:38.880
<v Speaker 1>nine situations that he's playing Georgia this year and he

0:39:39.320 --> 0:39:41.120
<v Speaker 1>has to make the throw and he did make them.

0:39:41.120 --> 0:39:44.400
<v Speaker 1>So it's not like you're working with nothing as a thrower,

0:39:44.440 --> 0:39:46.200
<v Speaker 1>and so I just it would have to be with

0:39:46.239 --> 0:39:48.239
<v Speaker 1>the right fit, and it might be a third, fourth round.

0:39:48.280 --> 0:39:50.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm not saying you would take him early. It might

0:39:50.440 --> 0:39:52.719
<v Speaker 1>be with a team like the Cardinals who don't need

0:39:53.040 --> 0:39:55.560
<v Speaker 1>anything right now, but are just like, hey, maybe in

0:39:55.600 --> 0:39:58.480
<v Speaker 1>a couple of years, Jalen Milroe would be an interesting option,

0:39:58.840 --> 0:39:59.960
<v Speaker 1>like instead of Kyler.

0:40:00.400 --> 0:40:01.719
<v Speaker 2>It might be like something like that.

0:40:01.800 --> 0:40:04.840
<v Speaker 1>But if you're telling me he's starting out his career

0:40:05.280 --> 0:40:08.360
<v Speaker 1>as like a plus like version of Taysom Hill or

0:40:08.360 --> 0:40:10.520
<v Speaker 1>something that comes in for a little bit Sean, like,

0:40:10.800 --> 0:40:12.879
<v Speaker 1>I'm buying that as a mid round pick, that would

0:40:12.880 --> 0:40:13.560
<v Speaker 1>be kind of fun.

0:40:13.680 --> 0:40:15.839
<v Speaker 3>Come on, John, as a mid round pick one hundred

0:40:15.840 --> 0:40:18.480
<v Speaker 3>percent of yeah, like I would. I would be really

0:40:18.520 --> 0:40:20.680
<v Speaker 3>in because there are a lot of things you're worth

0:40:20.719 --> 0:40:22.399
<v Speaker 3>working with. And you said it like the big time

0:40:22.440 --> 0:40:24.600
<v Speaker 3>throw rate. This guy really made a lot of high

0:40:24.600 --> 0:40:27.759
<v Speaker 3>degree difficulty throws too. Hey, it isn't like he's never

0:40:27.840 --> 0:40:30.279
<v Speaker 3>hit anybody on a pass or something like somebody gets

0:40:30.280 --> 0:40:33.319
<v Speaker 3>talked about. I think the consistency at the position, which

0:40:33.360 --> 0:40:36.160
<v Speaker 3>is I think the most underrated part of quarterback play

0:40:36.200 --> 0:40:38.399
<v Speaker 3>is not the hind stuff with the consistency is where

0:40:38.400 --> 0:40:40.600
<v Speaker 3>you really get concerned about him. Is that going to

0:40:40.640 --> 0:40:42.319
<v Speaker 3>be able to evolve or grow in the NFL? But like,

0:40:42.680 --> 0:40:45.480
<v Speaker 3>would you rather take a chance on somebody who's already

0:40:45.520 --> 0:40:49.040
<v Speaker 3>as you said, starting from an unbelievable mobility perspective, or

0:40:50.000 --> 0:40:51.600
<v Speaker 3>you know, we'll talk about him maybe a little bit.

0:40:51.640 --> 0:40:53.160
<v Speaker 3>But like somebody like Tyler Shuck, who.

0:40:54.080 --> 0:40:56.160
<v Speaker 2>Combine at all, it's all happening. It's all happening.

0:40:56.440 --> 0:40:58.279
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And I'm not like I would have I would

0:40:58.280 --> 0:41:01.359
<v Speaker 1>have Milroe ahead of Jackson dark Ultimate. Not that I

0:41:01.400 --> 0:41:05.319
<v Speaker 1>get why why he in a generic board, but just

0:41:05.360 --> 0:41:08.160
<v Speaker 1>that in the terms of ways that I think different

0:41:08.160 --> 0:41:10.279
<v Speaker 1>people are gonna want to miss in different types of ways,

0:41:10.280 --> 0:41:12.560
<v Speaker 1>I would be more comfortable missing with Milroe. I feel

0:41:12.560 --> 0:41:15.600
<v Speaker 1>like Jackson Dart's giving me too much like Drew Locke

0:41:15.680 --> 0:41:17.839
<v Speaker 1>vibes of the type of quarterback where it doesn't work.

0:41:17.840 --> 0:41:20.279
<v Speaker 1>Whereas if you have a vision of how Milroe could work,

0:41:20.480 --> 0:41:23.360
<v Speaker 1>all right, let's throw Shuck in here too. So Tyler

0:41:23.400 --> 0:41:29.000
<v Speaker 1>Shuck an older prospect at Louisville. He was in the

0:41:29.080 --> 0:41:35.239
<v Speaker 1>same prospect class as Trevor Lawrence, which is outrageous and

0:41:35.400 --> 0:41:37.719
<v Speaker 1>Justin and Justin Fields too, right, he was in that

0:41:37.880 --> 0:41:40.640
<v Speaker 1>class too, even though he came out a year later.

0:41:40.960 --> 0:41:42.840
<v Speaker 1>And so that to me is a little bit of

0:41:42.840 --> 0:41:43.280
<v Speaker 1>a knock.

0:41:44.040 --> 0:41:46.000
<v Speaker 2>Give me, give me your Tyler Shuck thoughts, Give me

0:41:46.000 --> 0:41:46.880
<v Speaker 2>your Tyler Shock.

0:41:46.760 --> 0:41:50.600
<v Speaker 3>And yet yeah, seven college seasons, and yet he has

0:41:50.719 --> 0:41:56.040
<v Speaker 3>four hundred less career dropbacks than Jackson Dart says way less,

0:41:56.719 --> 0:41:59.279
<v Speaker 3>way less than Sanders and camp Ward. He only has

0:41:59.280 --> 0:42:01.680
<v Speaker 3>one thousand, ninety five dropbacks and six cold seasons, was

0:42:01.719 --> 0:42:04.000
<v Speaker 3>injured during that seventh. He is one of the oldest

0:42:04.000 --> 0:42:06.040
<v Speaker 3>players in the class, as we mentioned, will be twenty

0:42:06.080 --> 0:42:09.120
<v Speaker 3>six as a rookie. However, he's also one of the

0:42:09.200 --> 0:42:11.720
<v Speaker 3>least experienced. That is a tough combination in a position

0:42:11.719 --> 0:42:15.080
<v Speaker 3>where experience matters greatly. Now I will say this, there

0:42:15.120 --> 0:42:17.040
<v Speaker 3>are some plays and this is why people like Tyler Schuck.

0:42:17.239 --> 0:42:20.719
<v Speaker 3>Everything is textbook greg backfoot hits, ball comes out anticipation,

0:42:20.840 --> 0:42:22.560
<v Speaker 3>throw middle of the field on a dig right in

0:42:22.600 --> 0:42:25.600
<v Speaker 3>the zone window. It's beautiful. And that's where the coach

0:42:25.680 --> 0:42:28.560
<v Speaker 3>people love Tyler Schuck, where they're like, this guy does

0:42:28.719 --> 0:42:30.680
<v Speaker 3>exactly what I asked for her to do. He plays

0:42:30.680 --> 0:42:33.759
<v Speaker 3>on time. This is great, and he's talented. It's not

0:42:33.840 --> 0:42:36.000
<v Speaker 3>like he's not talented. He is very talented. He's not

0:42:36.080 --> 0:42:38.480
<v Speaker 3>just like a system guy. Like there are some beautiful

0:42:38.520 --> 0:42:40.680
<v Speaker 3>throws he can move like. He is talented. I do

0:42:40.719 --> 0:42:42.680
<v Speaker 3>want to say that while I'm about to kill him.

0:42:42.680 --> 0:42:44.200
<v Speaker 3>He is yet and he has a good enough arm,

0:42:44.360 --> 0:42:47.680
<v Speaker 3>he size, he's dropbacks under center, all the stuff that

0:42:47.719 --> 0:42:49.840
<v Speaker 3>you know that the coach, the coach, draft people and

0:42:49.880 --> 0:42:51.640
<v Speaker 3>the coaches in the league are like, this guy, could

0:42:51.640 --> 0:42:53.040
<v Speaker 3>we could get him in the system, he could be

0:42:53.080 --> 0:42:55.319
<v Speaker 3>okay for us. Every coach thinks there's scheme is gonna

0:42:55.320 --> 0:42:56.680
<v Speaker 3>be enough and if they can just get a player

0:42:56.719 --> 0:42:58.880
<v Speaker 3>in THEO, they'll run the scheme, they'll be fine. The

0:42:58.920 --> 0:43:02.000
<v Speaker 3>problem is he just can't create. He's not a creator whatsoever.

0:43:02.040 --> 0:43:05.560
<v Speaker 3>Thirty one throwaways this season, super high number. He's improvement

0:43:05.560 --> 0:43:09.040
<v Speaker 3>in taking sacks is notable. But two things. His lack

0:43:09.080 --> 0:43:12.799
<v Speaker 3>of creation is an immense problem in my opinion, because

0:43:12.840 --> 0:43:14.759
<v Speaker 3>in the NFL, you're gonna be under pressure. So when

0:43:14.760 --> 0:43:17.040
<v Speaker 3>you can't create under pressure and you don't have any

0:43:17.040 --> 0:43:18.600
<v Speaker 3>desire to either. He was trying to get the ball

0:43:18.640 --> 0:43:20.680
<v Speaker 3>out of your end all the time. That's an issue

0:43:20.719 --> 0:43:22.719
<v Speaker 3>because you're gonna be in situation. So yeah, if he

0:43:22.760 --> 0:43:25.160
<v Speaker 3>gets in a game and everything goes perfect in that game,

0:43:25.320 --> 0:43:27.120
<v Speaker 3>he could be like the player of the week or

0:43:27.160 --> 0:43:30.200
<v Speaker 3>something like that type of guy. Next week they blitz

0:43:30.280 --> 0:43:32.279
<v Speaker 3>him and he's in trouble, and what does this guy do.

0:43:32.360 --> 0:43:35.880
<v Speaker 3>It's been hurt a million times right all over his tape. Greg.

0:43:35.920 --> 0:43:38.439
<v Speaker 3>He's falling away at the top of his ten, twelve

0:43:38.480 --> 0:43:40.520
<v Speaker 3>yards deep in the pocket. He's trying to get as

0:43:40.560 --> 0:43:43.239
<v Speaker 3>far away from the defensive line as possible. Pressure gets

0:43:43.280 --> 0:43:47.080
<v Speaker 3>through even in his vicinity, and he's falling off his platform.

0:43:47.200 --> 0:43:49.920
<v Speaker 3>He's falling away from contact. The ball's dying on him,

0:43:50.040 --> 0:43:52.520
<v Speaker 3>he's trying to throw it away, he's panicking, he's turning

0:43:52.600 --> 0:43:55.440
<v Speaker 3>up and taking a sack. It's just I just don't

0:43:55.440 --> 0:43:57.799
<v Speaker 3>think the negative I think the negatives are so bad

0:43:57.840 --> 0:44:00.000
<v Speaker 3>with him that I just don't think it's ever gonna

0:44:00.120 --> 0:44:02.800
<v Speaker 3>be consistent enough. In the NFL. He'll be a backup

0:44:02.840 --> 0:44:04.560
<v Speaker 3>because if for a team that hopefully doesn't need to

0:44:04.600 --> 0:44:06.840
<v Speaker 3>play him that often, but because I think he'll impress

0:44:06.880 --> 0:44:09.360
<v Speaker 3>in all the ways that you impress until the bullet

0:44:09.400 --> 0:44:11.440
<v Speaker 3>star flying, but once the bullets star flying, I just

0:44:11.480 --> 0:44:13.800
<v Speaker 3>think there's too many issues like this. The bad stuff

0:44:13.840 --> 0:44:16.560
<v Speaker 3>is going to be really bad. Even if, like on paper,

0:44:16.600 --> 0:44:18.000
<v Speaker 3>it makes sense that this guy could do what we

0:44:18.000 --> 0:44:19.600
<v Speaker 3>want him to do, but I just don't think when

0:44:19.640 --> 0:44:22.280
<v Speaker 3>you get in the game, there's not that same level

0:44:22.320 --> 0:44:24.120
<v Speaker 3>of aptitude and stressful situation.

0:44:24.280 --> 0:44:26.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, you got to have a code at some point

0:44:26.200 --> 0:44:28.880
<v Speaker 1>when you're evaluating these guys. What's your type, what do

0:44:28.920 --> 0:44:32.920
<v Speaker 1>you like? And to me, it's pocket presence. It's the

0:44:32.960 --> 0:44:35.759
<v Speaker 1>ability to not panic against pressure. Is probably the number

0:44:35.800 --> 0:44:38.759
<v Speaker 1>one thing I'm most confident in my basic guys being

0:44:38.800 --> 0:44:42.480
<v Speaker 1>able to recognize having watched all the quarterbacks that have

0:44:42.520 --> 0:44:44.560
<v Speaker 1>coming into the league and then especially in the league,

0:44:44.600 --> 0:44:47.680
<v Speaker 1>like just seeing that is the absolute number one thing

0:44:47.719 --> 0:44:52.120
<v Speaker 1>that will unravel good quarterbacks, average quarterbacks, below average quarterbacks.

0:44:52.160 --> 0:44:55.080
<v Speaker 1>It's what separates guys who have long careers. And that

0:44:55.200 --> 0:44:57.680
<v Speaker 1>to me was just like a cross off for what

0:44:57.760 --> 0:45:01.120
<v Speaker 1>you said, like the falling off, and I just didn't

0:45:01.400 --> 0:45:04.359
<v Speaker 1>not my guy, It'll be someone's guy. Greg Goseell had

0:45:04.400 --> 0:45:06.359
<v Speaker 1>him second, and I kind of get it. Where in

0:45:06.400 --> 0:45:10.319
<v Speaker 1>this class after cam Ward, you could make the case of,

0:45:10.440 --> 0:45:13.720
<v Speaker 1>depending on what you like, of six seven different types

0:45:13.760 --> 0:45:16.439
<v Speaker 1>of guys. But in this case, I think we're right

0:45:16.960 --> 0:45:18.680
<v Speaker 1>because I think it's just going to be a cross

0:45:18.800 --> 0:45:22.319
<v Speaker 1>out for him in terms of being able to play

0:45:22.360 --> 0:45:25.759
<v Speaker 1>against pressure. And we don't need to bury the kid.

0:45:25.960 --> 0:45:29.160
<v Speaker 1>He is at ninety six in the consensus board, by

0:45:29.200 --> 0:45:31.879
<v Speaker 1>the way, so he's some people probably have him even

0:45:31.920 --> 0:45:33.759
<v Speaker 1>higher in that he might go second or third round.

0:45:33.800 --> 0:45:35.160
<v Speaker 1>All right, of the rest of the guys, and we're

0:45:35.200 --> 0:45:37.080
<v Speaker 1>going to wrap up here quickly, but I will give

0:45:37.200 --> 0:45:40.680
<v Speaker 1>I just will give the floor to you those. I

0:45:40.680 --> 0:45:42.560
<v Speaker 1>don't know if those are the consensus top five. We

0:45:42.600 --> 0:45:45.000
<v Speaker 1>probably hit the consensus top four if Milroe's in that

0:45:45.360 --> 0:45:47.680
<v Speaker 1>we mentioned Will Howard already, who could be a guy

0:45:47.680 --> 0:45:51.279
<v Speaker 1>from Ohio State quinn Ewers. I feel like it's not

0:45:51.400 --> 0:45:55.240
<v Speaker 1>been talked up throughout the process from Texas, but someone

0:45:55.280 --> 0:45:59.560
<v Speaker 1>might like him. Dylan Gabriel from Oregon, Kyle McCord from Syracuse,

0:46:00.040 --> 0:46:02.640
<v Speaker 1>Abe Riley Leonard, who who Nate Tice is still holding

0:46:02.680 --> 0:46:04.640
<v Speaker 1>out like a little bit of hope for from Notre Dame.

0:46:04.880 --> 0:46:07.920
<v Speaker 1>Is there any of the other quarterbacks that catch your

0:46:07.920 --> 0:46:10.360
<v Speaker 1>eye the most, that you that you like or even

0:46:10.400 --> 0:46:12.439
<v Speaker 1>just that you think you have something interesting to say

0:46:12.480 --> 0:46:13.320
<v Speaker 1>about those guys?

0:46:14.600 --> 0:46:17.120
<v Speaker 3>Well, McCord is probably the interesting one. I guess I'm

0:46:17.160 --> 0:46:19.080
<v Speaker 3>not really high on them. I do like Will Howard

0:46:19.080 --> 0:46:21.440
<v Speaker 3>a little bit. I think he belongings in this conversation.

0:46:21.560 --> 0:46:24.680
<v Speaker 3>I will say that with with this kind of next group,

0:46:24.719 --> 0:46:26.440
<v Speaker 3>But you know, I mean there's a real path to me,

0:46:26.480 --> 0:46:28.919
<v Speaker 3>where Will Howard's better than Jackson Dart eventually in the league,

0:46:28.920 --> 0:46:32.560
<v Speaker 3>and maybe Sanders too. I think like that's possible because

0:46:32.680 --> 0:46:35.879
<v Speaker 3>those guys have some like potentially fatal flaws, and Will

0:46:35.920 --> 0:46:38.360
<v Speaker 3>Howard doesn't have any of the like high end stuff

0:46:38.400 --> 0:46:41.320
<v Speaker 3>they have, but it doesn't maybe have those fatal flaws.

0:46:41.320 --> 0:46:43.200
<v Speaker 3>So you know, it's so much of this is fit

0:46:43.239 --> 0:46:45.560
<v Speaker 3>with these guys. Once you get to limited players, you

0:46:45.600 --> 0:46:48.840
<v Speaker 3>get you get into massive fit conversations and fit questions.

0:46:49.120 --> 0:46:51.719
<v Speaker 3>So I wouldn't be offended by anybody who ranks these

0:46:51.719 --> 0:46:54.160
<v Speaker 3>guys in the same tier. I think so everybody else

0:46:54.200 --> 0:46:57.719
<v Speaker 3>to me after the Sanders shook, Dart Howard kind of

0:46:57.760 --> 0:46:59.600
<v Speaker 3>group in and Milro probably being in there too. If

0:46:59.640 --> 0:47:01.560
<v Speaker 3>you're just like upside, yeah, like he's not as polished

0:47:01.560 --> 0:47:03.720
<v Speaker 3>maybe some of them yet, but upside he could easily

0:47:03.719 --> 0:47:05.480
<v Speaker 3>be better than all those guys. If or not, it

0:47:05.480 --> 0:47:06.360
<v Speaker 3>wouldn't happen easily.

0:47:06.360 --> 0:47:09.360
<v Speaker 1>But you could disagree with me on my show, John,

0:47:09.400 --> 0:47:12.759
<v Speaker 1>you can say that's a bad I'm just thinking want

0:47:12.800 --> 0:47:15.160
<v Speaker 1>as a backup. He would be a fun backup, Like

0:47:15.280 --> 0:47:17.239
<v Speaker 1>once you get him, you probably need about a year,

0:47:17.560 --> 0:47:20.279
<v Speaker 1>but a fun backup that he gives you a different.

0:47:20.040 --> 0:47:21.680
<v Speaker 2>Look for a couple of games. Anyways, I'll shut up

0:47:21.680 --> 0:47:21.960
<v Speaker 2>about I.

0:47:22.120 --> 0:47:24.080
<v Speaker 3>Know I would take Miller over Shuck for sure, and

0:47:24.120 --> 0:47:26.279
<v Speaker 3>I would I think there's a real path to the

0:47:26.280 --> 0:47:28.000
<v Speaker 3>other guys just not being good enough, and so I

0:47:28.000 --> 0:47:29.800
<v Speaker 3>would be if the Steelers taken for whatever, I'll be

0:47:29.840 --> 0:47:32.680
<v Speaker 3>really intrigued by that. Obviously the fit would be weird.

0:47:32.760 --> 0:47:35.080
<v Speaker 3>Mccorda is the interesting one because I think he was

0:47:35.080 --> 0:47:36.759
<v Speaker 3>just kind of an afterthought. He went to Syracuse and

0:47:36.760 --> 0:47:38.680
<v Speaker 3>the numbers were better, but still people were talking about

0:47:38.680 --> 0:47:41.120
<v Speaker 3>Now as you get closer and you start hearing people

0:47:41.160 --> 0:47:42.960
<v Speaker 3>in the league talk, it's like, wait, you're gonna take

0:47:42.960 --> 0:47:44.279
<v Speaker 3>this guy on the top one hundred? Is that?

0:47:44.600 --> 0:47:45.320
<v Speaker 2>Oh? Okay?

0:47:45.440 --> 0:47:47.879
<v Speaker 3>And he's a guy that can, like if you talk

0:47:47.880 --> 0:47:50.239
<v Speaker 3>about Hydergow difficulty throws, he can make him. And he

0:47:50.239 --> 0:47:51.839
<v Speaker 3>made it more of this past year at Syracuse than

0:47:51.880 --> 0:47:54.400
<v Speaker 3>we even saw at Ohio State. It was interesting. It

0:47:54.440 --> 0:47:56.640
<v Speaker 3>was it wasn't good enough to elevate the talent at

0:47:56.640 --> 0:47:58.759
<v Speaker 3>Ohio State, but he didn't really need to write there's

0:47:58.800 --> 0:48:00.359
<v Speaker 3>great talent there. So it was like, well, if he's

0:48:00.400 --> 0:48:02.200
<v Speaker 3>not good enough with these guys, then he's not gonna

0:48:02.200 --> 0:48:03.880
<v Speaker 3>be good enough Syracuse, and then he went to Syracuse

0:48:03.920 --> 0:48:05.880
<v Speaker 3>and elevated the talent there. It was really it was

0:48:06.000 --> 0:48:08.800
<v Speaker 3>very fascinating. So just to step in the right direction

0:48:08.960 --> 0:48:11.279
<v Speaker 3>and the progress that he made, I think we'll have

0:48:11.360 --> 0:48:14.000
<v Speaker 3>people intrigued because there's a big arm, not very mobile.

0:48:14.160 --> 0:48:15.680
<v Speaker 3>I think there's a lot of concerns he's going to

0:48:15.719 --> 0:48:17.759
<v Speaker 3>throw the ball the other team all the time. And so,

0:48:18.000 --> 0:48:20.279
<v Speaker 3>you know, Mitchell Trubisky's been a common comp for him,

0:48:20.280 --> 0:48:22.400
<v Speaker 3>and I think it makes a lot of sense. Is

0:48:22.400 --> 0:48:24.440
<v Speaker 3>there a world in which Trubisky could have turned down

0:48:24.440 --> 0:48:27.080
<v Speaker 3>to a better prob I don't think so. Teams might

0:48:27.120 --> 0:48:30.279
<v Speaker 3>think so. I'm not particularly high on McCord, but to me,

0:48:30.320 --> 0:48:33.279
<v Speaker 3>he's more interesting than Gabriel or yours or some of

0:48:33.280 --> 0:48:35.719
<v Speaker 3>those other guys that maybe are going to be talked

0:48:35.719 --> 0:48:36.919
<v Speaker 3>about in this range of the draft.

0:48:37.040 --> 0:48:39.600
<v Speaker 1>Well, he would certainly take Trubisky's career because he'd be

0:48:39.640 --> 0:48:42.880
<v Speaker 1>a mid mid round pick that lasted in the league.

0:48:42.920 --> 0:48:45.360
<v Speaker 1>Not that they would get the starts that that Trubisky

0:48:45.400 --> 0:48:48.279
<v Speaker 1>got because of his draft status. I appreciate it. There's

0:48:48.320 --> 0:48:50.480
<v Speaker 1>no need to try to force it is. It is

0:48:50.520 --> 0:48:53.719
<v Speaker 1>a thing that happens with these drafts with the quarterbacks.

0:48:54.000 --> 0:48:57.360
<v Speaker 1>The most notable recent example being twenty twenty two. Just

0:48:57.400 --> 0:49:00.560
<v Speaker 1>looking at the consensus board, which it's it's funny to

0:49:00.560 --> 0:49:04.960
<v Speaker 1>look back at now going into that draft, the consensus

0:49:04.960 --> 0:49:08.840
<v Speaker 1>board among the draft Knicks had Malik Willis ten. He's

0:49:08.920 --> 0:49:12.080
<v Speaker 1>on his second team and has found a great spot.

0:49:12.200 --> 0:49:13.759
<v Speaker 1>Now he looks like one of the best backups in

0:49:13.800 --> 0:49:16.520
<v Speaker 1>the league. But you know, he was at ten. Pickett

0:49:16.520 --> 0:49:20.640
<v Speaker 1>was at fifteen, Ritter was at thirty one. He's on

0:49:20.719 --> 0:49:23.960
<v Speaker 1>his third team. Kenny Pickett's on his third team. Matt Krall,

0:49:24.160 --> 0:49:26.400
<v Speaker 1>who is now throwing the passes at the Common was

0:49:26.480 --> 0:49:29.120
<v Speaker 1>thirty six. This is where it really got crazy. Howell

0:49:29.239 --> 0:49:32.080
<v Speaker 1>was at forty six. Carson Strong was at seventy eight.

0:49:32.160 --> 0:49:34.520
<v Speaker 1>So you don't need to just push up quarterbacks just

0:49:34.560 --> 0:49:36.839
<v Speaker 1>because they're the quarterbacks. And it's not like there were

0:49:37.360 --> 0:49:40.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, guys later in the draft other than Perty

0:49:41.280 --> 0:49:42.879
<v Speaker 1>that that ended up making it happen.

0:49:42.920 --> 0:49:44.560
<v Speaker 2>But Perty did make it happen.

0:49:44.680 --> 0:49:47.040
<v Speaker 3>So the league. Wolves was my top quarterback that year

0:49:47.040 --> 0:49:48.560
<v Speaker 3>and I think he was in the seventies on thee.

0:49:48.600 --> 0:49:50.759
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, you don't need to force it. It is closer to

0:49:50.840 --> 0:49:52.719
<v Speaker 1>one of those years I.

0:49:52.719 --> 0:49:55.360
<v Speaker 3>Would say this class, I will say this is better.

0:49:55.200 --> 0:49:57.880
<v Speaker 2>Than Oh yeah, it's way better. I agree with that.

0:49:58.280 --> 0:50:01.480
<v Speaker 1>I think I think should have Sanders at worst is

0:50:01.520 --> 0:50:03.160
<v Speaker 1>going to have a long career in the league. I'm

0:50:03.200 --> 0:50:07.040
<v Speaker 1>excited about getting to watch cam Ward every Sunday. And

0:50:07.080 --> 0:50:10.560
<v Speaker 1>then I do think Millroll's got a chance, and Dart

0:50:10.600 --> 0:50:11.919
<v Speaker 1>certainly has a chance.

0:50:11.920 --> 0:50:14.200
<v Speaker 2>In some of these other guys, they got a chance.

0:50:14.640 --> 0:50:19.359
<v Speaker 1>John Ledyard, appreciate you coming on. Check out audibles and

0:50:19.400 --> 0:50:22.640
<v Speaker 1>analytics with Ollie Connelly, any anything else you want you

0:50:22.640 --> 0:50:24.759
<v Speaker 1>want to pump up, because look, if you're a Bucks fan,

0:50:24.800 --> 0:50:26.600
<v Speaker 1>you're you're probably a lot of Bucks content, a lot

0:50:26.600 --> 0:50:29.840
<v Speaker 1>of Steelers content, and then YouTube cover the entire league.

0:50:30.600 --> 0:50:33.320
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, Bucks and Steelers content. Lots of NFL draft scouting

0:50:33.360 --> 0:50:35.360
<v Speaker 3>reports going up right now on the site. Just published

0:50:35.360 --> 0:50:38.360
<v Speaker 3>like five safety reports. Allie and I did in depth

0:50:38.440 --> 0:50:41.960
<v Speaker 3>podcasts about the safety class and the running back class

0:50:42.000 --> 0:50:43.960
<v Speaker 3>this week, and we went through our tiers and rankings

0:50:43.960 --> 0:50:47.080
<v Speaker 3>and evaluations. So lots of those kind of fun conversations

0:50:47.080 --> 0:50:49.680
<v Speaker 3>happening there. We'll get corners next week, We'll get linebackers

0:50:49.719 --> 0:50:52.279
<v Speaker 3>coming up here soon. Finish this thing out strong, going

0:50:52.320 --> 0:50:54.000
<v Speaker 3>into the draft. So yeah, people are interesting.

0:50:54.600 --> 0:50:57.480
<v Speaker 1>You're not afraid to bury guys, you know, you just

0:50:57.480 --> 0:51:00.560
<v Speaker 1>just bury him sometime. I guess it's the confidence that

0:51:00.600 --> 0:51:03.719
<v Speaker 1>comes with like a jaw that's square. That John is

0:51:03.760 --> 0:51:09.240
<v Speaker 1>posted here does burying these young men? No, I'm kidding.

0:51:09.239 --> 0:51:11.560
<v Speaker 1>I like the honesty. You guys talk like like the

0:51:11.560 --> 0:51:15.040
<v Speaker 1>scout drave like the front offices talk. Yes, they're all

0:51:15.080 --> 0:51:16.920
<v Speaker 1>doing the same thing. It makes sense. All right, that's

0:51:16.960 --> 0:51:18.719
<v Speaker 1>it for today's show. Hit the Music, Eric.

0:51:19.239 --> 0:51:19.600
<v Speaker 2>Uh.

0:51:19.640 --> 0:51:22.360
<v Speaker 1>We got a big week, so I mentioned we're really

0:51:22.600 --> 0:51:25.480
<v Speaker 1>zeroing in on draft coverage. We've got our first mock

0:51:25.600 --> 0:51:28.640
<v Speaker 1>draft of draft season, maybe the last, probably the last,

0:51:28.960 --> 0:51:32.600
<v Speaker 1>with Nate Tice coming up on our Tuesday show, so

0:51:33.120 --> 0:51:35.840
<v Speaker 1>stay tuned for that one. We got DJ later in

0:51:35.920 --> 0:51:38.480
<v Speaker 1>the week. We got a great week. A guess Nick

0:51:38.520 --> 0:51:42.840
<v Speaker 1>Schuck coming up to football's back didn't land it