1
00:00:02,720 --> 00:00:13,200
Speaker 1: Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news.

2
00:00:15,440 --> 00:00:16,920
Speaker 2: The tariff is a tax increase.

3
00:00:17,360 --> 00:00:19,880
Speaker 3: It's a tax that applies to imported goods and the

4
00:00:20,000 --> 00:00:22,360
Speaker 3: United States, so it burdens US importers.

5
00:00:23,079 --> 00:00:25,160
Speaker 2: There's no way that it's a tax cut.

6
00:00:25,200 --> 00:00:27,920
Speaker 3: It increases revenue, it increases the tax burden in the

7
00:00:28,000 --> 00:00:28,720
Speaker 3: US economy.

8
00:00:31,040 --> 00:00:33,480
Speaker 4: Rookie York in the Tax Foundation on the early edition

9
00:00:33,520 --> 00:00:36,040
Speaker 4: of Balance of Power yesterday talking about how tariffs might

10
00:00:36,080 --> 00:00:39,559
Speaker 4: impact impending tax policy. Because you know, we're doing it

11
00:00:39,600 --> 00:00:41,720
Speaker 4: all at once right now in Washington, joining us as

12
00:00:41,760 --> 00:00:45,320
Speaker 4: Kevin Brady, former US Congressman from Texas, spokesman for the

13
00:00:45,320 --> 00:00:48,920
Speaker 4: Alliance for Competitive Taxation, of course, former chair of the

14
00:00:48,960 --> 00:00:50,680
Speaker 4: House Ways and Means Committee.

15
00:00:50,680 --> 00:00:51,960
Speaker 2: It's great to see you in town.

16
00:00:52,720 --> 00:00:54,279
Speaker 4: I don't know if you're hearing anything on what we're

17
00:00:54,280 --> 00:00:56,120
Speaker 4: going to learn tomorrow, but everybody's trying to get a

18
00:00:56,160 --> 00:00:58,920
Speaker 4: sense of what this announcement will be from President Trump.

19
00:00:58,960 --> 00:01:02,440
Speaker 4: Whatever it is will help the color the debate around taxes.

20
00:01:02,520 --> 00:01:05,280
Speaker 4: Right We've started this whole process talking about tariffs helping

21
00:01:05,280 --> 00:01:07,959
Speaker 4: to raise revenue to cover the cost of tax cuts.

22
00:01:08,000 --> 00:01:09,200
Speaker 2: Will that be fulfilled tomorrow?

23
00:01:09,720 --> 00:01:13,600
Speaker 5: You know, likely, not necessarily. I think people are hoping

24
00:01:13,800 --> 00:01:18,120
Speaker 5: that tariffs will be short and uses leverage to bring

25
00:01:18,160 --> 00:01:22,200
Speaker 5: countries to the table with better resolution on issues, including

26
00:01:22,319 --> 00:01:25,600
Speaker 5: lower tariffs. I think people are hopeful it's not a

27
00:01:25,680 --> 00:01:30,319
Speaker 5: high universal tariff that is permanent nature, which will cause.

28
00:01:30,440 --> 00:01:31,840
Speaker 2: A lot of economic damage.

29
00:01:31,880 --> 00:01:34,240
Speaker 5: But I think the point is for all the uncertainty

30
00:01:34,360 --> 00:01:37,119
Speaker 5: that's around tariffs seems to be in every sector and

31
00:01:37,160 --> 00:01:38,959
Speaker 5: lots of families around the country.

32
00:01:39,040 --> 00:01:40,080
Speaker 2: It really drives home the.

33
00:01:40,040 --> 00:01:42,640
Speaker 5: Need for certainty within the tax coat. And I think

34
00:01:42,680 --> 00:01:46,520
Speaker 5: really the pace that the Houses Senate are moving forward

35
00:01:46,560 --> 00:01:49,880
Speaker 5: on recognizes as sooner they get this done, the better.

36
00:01:49,920 --> 00:01:52,000
Speaker 5: They've still got some big hurdles. This is a hard

37
00:01:52,560 --> 00:01:54,840
Speaker 5: This is a hard job in the best of times.

38
00:01:54,840 --> 00:01:57,559
Speaker 5: With the near zero majority in the House, a higher

39
00:01:57,640 --> 00:02:01,480
Speaker 5: degree of difficulty in a bigger way depths and depthsits matter.

40
00:02:01,920 --> 00:02:04,120
Speaker 5: So yeah, there's a lot of challenges ahead. But I

41
00:02:04,200 --> 00:02:07,280
Speaker 5: think I really command the House Senate tax writers. They

42
00:02:07,320 --> 00:02:10,880
Speaker 5: are moving as fast as as it's allowed.

43
00:02:11,120 --> 00:02:14,160
Speaker 3: But are they moving in the same direction, rowing in

44
00:02:14,200 --> 00:02:17,160
Speaker 3: the same boat to an extent that will allow this

45
00:02:17,240 --> 00:02:18,400
Speaker 3: process to move quickly?

46
00:02:18,840 --> 00:02:21,160
Speaker 5: Ultimately they will, I'm confident they will. But the Housan,

47
00:02:21,840 --> 00:02:24,880
Speaker 5: you know, they are different personalities and they move different.

48
00:02:24,560 --> 00:02:25,880
Speaker 2: Ways and different rules.

49
00:02:26,000 --> 00:02:29,440
Speaker 5: So I think the Senate this week looks to be

50
00:02:29,600 --> 00:02:32,760
Speaker 5: sort of advancing their idea. I think some of us

51
00:02:32,800 --> 00:02:36,040
Speaker 5: thought that the next step would be the two houses

52
00:02:36,080 --> 00:02:38,960
Speaker 5: have reconciled sort of the design. What I always said

53
00:02:39,040 --> 00:02:42,840
Speaker 5: was reconciliation was the runway you landed tax reform on.

54
00:02:43,040 --> 00:02:48,680
Speaker 5: So they're definitely two different architects, different designs at this point. Ultimately,

55
00:02:48,760 --> 00:02:51,280
Speaker 5: I think important for the Senate to act in advance

56
00:02:51,400 --> 00:02:53,800
Speaker 5: like the House has. But as sooner they they in

57
00:02:53,840 --> 00:02:56,000
Speaker 5: the White House get on the same page, the better.

58
00:02:56,160 --> 00:02:58,960
Speaker 4: You're in an interesting moment here, as you've been spending

59
00:02:59,000 --> 00:03:01,800
Speaker 4: time in Washington now for months, getting closer to the

60
00:03:01,800 --> 00:03:04,640
Speaker 4: finish line to extend or make permanent the Trump tax cuts.

61
00:03:04,639 --> 00:03:05,840
Speaker 2: That's been your charge.

62
00:03:06,400 --> 00:03:09,079
Speaker 4: But she heard Eric Yorke's comment when we're coming into

63
00:03:09,120 --> 00:03:14,360
Speaker 4: this this conversation, you're taking that amount away from individuals

64
00:03:14,400 --> 00:03:17,320
Speaker 4: and businesses in the private economy. By any definition, this

65
00:03:17,360 --> 00:03:19,560
Speaker 4: is a tax increase. So we could be in a

66
00:03:19,600 --> 00:03:21,400
Speaker 4: world where they cancel each other out.

67
00:03:21,840 --> 00:03:22,919
Speaker 2: So I hope not.

68
00:03:24,400 --> 00:03:27,480
Speaker 5: You know, I actually think tariffs are a tax, but

69
00:03:27,639 --> 00:03:31,520
Speaker 5: worse economical because not only do they drive up prices,

70
00:03:31,600 --> 00:03:34,680
Speaker 5: really distort the economy and slow it down. In most cases,

71
00:03:34,800 --> 00:03:39,360
Speaker 5: it invites retaliation on our made in America workers, you

72
00:03:39,360 --> 00:03:40,680
Speaker 5: know what I mean, in a big way. And as

73
00:03:40,680 --> 00:03:42,880
Speaker 5: you know, it's not enough to buy American. You need

74
00:03:42,920 --> 00:03:46,040
Speaker 5: to sell American all throughout the world. Tens of millions

75
00:03:46,080 --> 00:03:49,240
Speaker 5: of jobs depend upon our ability to do that successfully.

76
00:03:49,360 --> 00:03:52,120
Speaker 5: The tax code plays a key role on ADVI. Tariffs

77
00:03:52,400 --> 00:03:56,040
Speaker 5: really change the whole dynamics there Again, I think that's

78
00:03:56,080 --> 00:04:00,480
Speaker 5: why people are hopeful and why policymakers, I think Congress

79
00:04:00,480 --> 00:04:01,840
Speaker 5: are given the President.

80
00:04:01,680 --> 00:04:02,840
Speaker 2: A bit of a honeymoon here.

81
00:04:03,040 --> 00:04:05,120
Speaker 5: You know, I mean to unveil this strategy, which we're

82
00:04:05,120 --> 00:04:08,400
Speaker 5: going to see a lot of it tomorrow. But they're

83
00:04:08,680 --> 00:04:12,120
Speaker 5: very nervous about the impact on prices, the economy, and

84
00:04:12,520 --> 00:04:15,880
Speaker 5: their workers, especially because our trade agreement with Canada and Mexico,

85
00:04:16,440 --> 00:04:21,280
Speaker 5: the most consequence trade agreement on the planet, has worked beautifully,

86
00:04:21,480 --> 00:04:25,080
Speaker 5: was renegotiated under President Trump. And not only is it

87
00:04:25,160 --> 00:04:28,520
Speaker 5: to create about seventeen million jobs in the US that

88
00:04:28,680 --> 00:04:33,720
Speaker 5: give us more affordable prices, more affordable cars, and allows

89
00:04:33,800 --> 00:04:37,240
Speaker 5: us to combine our strengths to compete better against China.

90
00:04:37,360 --> 00:04:40,720
Speaker 5: So Yeah, lots of stake and all these announcements well and.

91
00:04:40,680 --> 00:04:43,240
Speaker 3: Clearly, sir, you are a big advocate for the USMCA.

92
00:04:43,360 --> 00:04:45,719
Speaker 3: When you hear the language now coming out of Canadian

93
00:04:45,720 --> 00:04:49,599
Speaker 3: Prime Minister Mark Karney about this having fundamentally altered the

94
00:04:49,680 --> 00:04:52,360
Speaker 3: relationship between Canada and the US, do you think that's

95
00:04:52,440 --> 00:04:54,800
Speaker 3: just posturing because he has to put up a show

96
00:04:54,800 --> 00:04:57,640
Speaker 3: of force against these policies or is this actually going

97
00:04:57,680 --> 00:04:58,800
Speaker 3: to be hard to come back from.

98
00:04:58,920 --> 00:05:00,240
Speaker 2: It's going to be difficult to come back.

99
00:05:00,760 --> 00:05:06,440
Speaker 5: This is such a strong partnership economically and integration has

100
00:05:06,480 --> 00:05:09,760
Speaker 5: worked for all of our strengths. It's tough to hear about,

101
00:05:10,160 --> 00:05:12,760
Speaker 5: you know, being named the fifty first state.

102
00:05:12,760 --> 00:05:17,080
Speaker 2: Or sort of the rhetoric around this.

103
00:05:18,000 --> 00:05:22,160
Speaker 5: It's having an impact in both of our borders as well.

104
00:05:22,240 --> 00:05:25,120
Speaker 5: So I think the sooner that we can come to

105
00:05:25,160 --> 00:05:29,480
Speaker 5: the table and work through these issues. Certainly, Mexico can

106
00:05:29,560 --> 00:05:33,200
Speaker 5: agreement with America is almost near zero tariffs on most products,

107
00:05:33,279 --> 00:05:36,839
Speaker 5: pretty low barriers. Not perfect. You know, we've had trade tensions.

108
00:05:37,240 --> 00:05:39,640
Speaker 5: We have to resolve those, but we should never forget

109
00:05:39,960 --> 00:05:43,120
Speaker 5: because of our strengths. Putting them together, we compete better

110
00:05:43,120 --> 00:05:46,520
Speaker 5: against China. We compete better against the world. That matters

111
00:05:46,560 --> 00:05:48,080
Speaker 5: a lot to jobs and prosperity.

112
00:05:48,200 --> 00:05:51,279
Speaker 4: You mentioned the thin Republican majority in the House right now.

113
00:05:51,320 --> 00:05:54,279
Speaker 4: I suspect that's when you couldn't have imagined while you're there.

114
00:05:54,400 --> 00:05:56,520
Speaker 4: There are a couple of special elections in Florida today,

115
00:05:56,520 --> 00:05:59,599
Speaker 4: House races where it appears that Republicans will hold two seats,

116
00:05:59,640 --> 00:06:02,080
Speaker 4: one from held by Matt Gates, the other Mike Waltz,

117
00:06:02,120 --> 00:06:05,360
Speaker 4: the President's national security advisor. But that's sixth District race,

118
00:06:05,400 --> 00:06:08,200
Speaker 4: the Waltz seat, the district Donald Trump won by more

119
00:06:08,200 --> 00:06:10,120
Speaker 4: than thirty points. You've got a Republican said to be

120
00:06:10,160 --> 00:06:13,400
Speaker 4: on the ropes here and might scrape out a close victory.

121
00:06:13,680 --> 00:06:16,720
Speaker 4: This is being framed by some as a proxy as

122
00:06:16,720 --> 00:06:19,040
Speaker 4: a statement on the Trump policies.

123
00:06:19,080 --> 00:06:20,320
Speaker 2: Do you see it that way? Or are we reading

124
00:06:20,320 --> 00:06:21,120
Speaker 2: into this too? Yeah?

125
00:06:21,160 --> 00:06:23,880
Speaker 5: I don't great question. I don't don't know. I don't

126
00:06:23,880 --> 00:06:25,880
Speaker 5: know that race quite that will have been following it

127
00:06:26,000 --> 00:06:28,640
Speaker 5: closely like everyone else has. So I just think these

128
00:06:28,680 --> 00:06:31,400
Speaker 5: special elections get a lot of attention, and then when

129
00:06:31,400 --> 00:06:35,120
Speaker 5: they don't really you know, come out, they're quickly forgotten.

130
00:06:35,200 --> 00:06:37,039
Speaker 2: You know what I mean? That's right, you know they

131
00:06:37,120 --> 00:06:38,680
Speaker 2: tend to work back to the norm.

132
00:06:38,720 --> 00:06:41,880
Speaker 5: I think that'll happen again, but sure, I think Republicans

133
00:06:41,880 --> 00:06:45,200
Speaker 5: and Democrats from paying attention every election at this point.

134
00:06:45,480 --> 00:06:47,440
Speaker 3: Well, and there won't be a third special election for

135
00:06:47,480 --> 00:06:49,520
Speaker 3: at least next top president was a little bit concerned

136
00:06:49,560 --> 00:06:51,680
Speaker 3: about holding onto that one. Therefore he's keeping her in

137
00:06:51,680 --> 00:06:53,800
Speaker 3: the House rather than you an ambassador. But an issue

138
00:06:53,800 --> 00:06:55,600
Speaker 3: in her district in New York, really all of New

139
00:06:55,640 --> 00:06:58,080
Speaker 3: York and other high tax states that we often talk

140
00:06:58,120 --> 00:07:00,800
Speaker 3: about with you is the salt cap. And Bloomberg is

141
00:07:00,839 --> 00:07:04,800
Speaker 3: reporting today that they're looking at Republicans in Congress are

142
00:07:04,839 --> 00:07:07,160
Speaker 3: looking at raising it to twenty five thousand dollars from

143
00:07:07,200 --> 00:07:09,840
Speaker 3: the current ten thousand dollars. I wonder if that's in

144
00:07:09,880 --> 00:07:11,400
Speaker 3: line with what you're hearing, and if you think that

145
00:07:11,520 --> 00:07:14,440
Speaker 3: is enough to pacify the salt Gaucus will still keep

146
00:07:14,440 --> 00:07:15,960
Speaker 3: in conservative hardliners in line.

147
00:07:16,000 --> 00:07:18,960
Speaker 5: Well, it should be, because it's a huge increase.

148
00:07:19,000 --> 00:07:21,880
Speaker 2: I mean, both dollar wise and the impact on the.

149
00:07:21,800 --> 00:07:24,880
Speaker 5: Tax bill itself is going to be significant. It is

150
00:07:24,920 --> 00:07:29,120
Speaker 5: certainly a huge expansion of what is basically one of

151
00:07:29,160 --> 00:07:31,560
Speaker 5: the biggest subsidies who've gotten the tax coat, you know,

152
00:07:31,640 --> 00:07:33,640
Speaker 5: on the individual side, of that, and so I would

153
00:07:33,640 --> 00:07:37,800
Speaker 5: think for the high tax states, again, who's most of

154
00:07:37,920 --> 00:07:43,040
Speaker 5: taxpayer's overwhelming got a tax cut, that is a huge number,

155
00:07:43,160 --> 00:07:46,320
Speaker 5: I think, probably bigger than I thought it would be, frankly,

156
00:07:46,480 --> 00:07:49,160
Speaker 5: but I think it's going to be very careful, very

157
00:07:50,240 --> 00:07:54,720
Speaker 5: important for them to arrive at that consensus number between

158
00:07:54,960 --> 00:07:57,760
Speaker 5: Republicans the House, Senate, and the White House. The sooner

159
00:07:57,800 --> 00:07:59,800
Speaker 5: they do that, the better they're able to move the

160
00:07:59,840 --> 00:08:00,520
Speaker 5: whole package.

161
00:08:00,560 --> 00:08:02,520
Speaker 4: For There are a few stories that we could ask

162
00:08:02,520 --> 00:08:04,840
Speaker 4: you about that tend to get more attention from our

163
00:08:04,920 --> 00:08:07,920
Speaker 4: viewers and listeners are subscribers at Bloomberg. The salt story

164
00:08:08,200 --> 00:08:10,800
Speaker 4: gets a read spike every time it hits the terminal here.

165
00:08:11,080 --> 00:08:14,200
Speaker 4: Does that number sound like something that will bring members

166
00:08:14,200 --> 00:08:16,800
Speaker 4: of the Salt Caucus over because you can explain they're

167
00:08:16,840 --> 00:08:19,200
Speaker 4: needed to pass any final bill.

168
00:08:19,280 --> 00:08:19,480
Speaker 2: Right.

169
00:08:19,840 --> 00:08:21,760
Speaker 5: So, I think given that there are a number of

170
00:08:21,800 --> 00:08:25,040
Speaker 5: Republicans who believe the salt tax numbers should be zero,

171
00:08:25,440 --> 00:08:28,560
Speaker 5: that everyone should just pay their own state and local taxes,

172
00:08:29,120 --> 00:08:31,600
Speaker 5: that would be that would be a big give to

173
00:08:31,800 --> 00:08:34,480
Speaker 5: I think the publican members from the high tax states.

174
00:08:34,520 --> 00:08:37,440
Speaker 5: So you know, if that is the number that would be,

175
00:08:38,360 --> 00:08:40,400
Speaker 5: that would be a huge win for them.

176
00:08:40,520 --> 00:08:41,640
Speaker 2: I don't know that's the case.

177
00:08:41,679 --> 00:08:45,880
Speaker 5: You hear about a doubling to twenty thousand and I

178
00:08:45,920 --> 00:08:48,719
Speaker 5: guess one question is that twenty five thousand four all

179
00:08:48,760 --> 00:08:52,120
Speaker 5: incomes or for some You know, there's lots of ways

180
00:08:52,160 --> 00:08:55,839
Speaker 5: to sort of target those things because so much the salt.

181
00:08:55,600 --> 00:08:57,640
Speaker 2: Goes to the million dollar household.

182
00:08:57,720 --> 00:09:00,760
Speaker 5: So yeah, still more details I think need to be known, and.

183
00:09:00,800 --> 00:09:01,840
Speaker 2: The details do matter.

184
00:09:02,240 --> 00:09:05,079
Speaker 3: Kevin Brady, former chair of the House Ways and Means Committee,

185
00:09:05,080 --> 00:09:08,320
Speaker 3: and spokesperson for the Alliance for Competitive Taxation, Thank you

186
00:09:08,360 --> 00:09:09,839
Speaker 3: so much, as always for joining us.