WEBVTT - The Fed Decision, Tech Earnings on Tap

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:13.760
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. This is the Bloomberg

0:00:13.840 --> 0:00:17.920
<v Speaker 1>Surveillance Podcast. Catch us live weekdays at seven am Eastern

0:00:18.200 --> 0:00:22.000
<v Speaker 1>on Apple CarPlay or Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business app.

0:00:22.360 --> 0:00:25.680
<v Speaker 1>Listen on demand wherever you get your podcasts, or watch

0:00:25.760 --> 0:00:27.200
<v Speaker 1>us live on YouTube.

0:00:27.520 --> 0:00:30.640
<v Speaker 2>This is a joy because we keep very much track

0:00:30.680 --> 0:00:33.400
<v Speaker 2>of people with short Oh, Mike Green, I'm sorry, we

0:00:33.479 --> 0:00:35.320
<v Speaker 2>got breaking news. You're gonna be on for a minute

0:00:35.320 --> 0:00:38.319
<v Speaker 2>and a half. So this morning, I don't care if

0:00:38.320 --> 0:00:40.960
<v Speaker 2>there's breaking news now, we're not gonna go to it.

0:00:41.000 --> 0:00:43.640
<v Speaker 2>We're gonna go to Mike Green here to get some good,

0:00:43.680 --> 0:00:46.639
<v Speaker 2>good analysis about what's going on. Of course, with Simplify

0:00:47.240 --> 0:00:51.159
<v Speaker 2>asset management, I look at the Washington postfeed, the New

0:00:51.240 --> 0:00:55.640
<v Speaker 2>York Times feed. It's nuts out there. How do you

0:00:55.880 --> 0:01:02.160
<v Speaker 2>synthesize the chaos over into just remain calm to execute

0:01:02.280 --> 0:01:03.400
<v Speaker 2>investment process?

0:01:03.640 --> 0:01:05.240
<v Speaker 3>Well, I think all of us are kind of hoping

0:01:05.280 --> 0:01:07.759
<v Speaker 3>that that chaos that you're describing is just the flurry

0:01:07.800 --> 0:01:10.120
<v Speaker 3>of blows that comes out from an aggressive boxer in

0:01:10.120 --> 0:01:13.280
<v Speaker 3>the first round, and that eventually it settles down. But

0:01:13.360 --> 0:01:15.479
<v Speaker 3>it is remarkable when you kind of look at what's

0:01:15.480 --> 0:01:18.480
<v Speaker 3>happening We used to wake up to market volatility and

0:01:18.520 --> 0:01:21.279
<v Speaker 3>look to the politics to explain it, and instead today

0:01:21.319 --> 0:01:25.759
<v Speaker 3>we're looking at political volatility and the markets remain totally sanguine.

0:01:25.800 --> 0:01:27.320
<v Speaker 2>I think a lot of it is just we don't

0:01:27.360 --> 0:01:30.200
<v Speaker 2>know what to do, right may I look at it.

0:01:30.760 --> 0:01:33.520
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if you know this, but Lisa's newspapers

0:01:33.880 --> 0:01:36.399
<v Speaker 2>at the back end of the seven o'clock hour that's

0:01:36.520 --> 0:01:41.600
<v Speaker 2>funded by an NGO, a government thing, and the answer

0:01:41.640 --> 0:01:44.759
<v Speaker 2>is like, even NGOs, our guests are unfunded right now.

0:01:45.840 --> 0:01:48.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so this is the key question. Now, a federal

0:01:48.640 --> 0:01:50.400
<v Speaker 3>judge just put a stay on this for a week.

0:01:50.440 --> 0:01:52.880
<v Speaker 3>We'll find out on Monday what the ultimate decision is

0:01:52.880 --> 0:01:54.320
<v Speaker 3>around this, or at least what the next step in

0:01:54.360 --> 0:01:58.360
<v Speaker 3>the process. But yeah, this decision to stop funding the NGOs,

0:01:58.360 --> 0:02:01.600
<v Speaker 3>et cetera, in pursue of basically making sure that Trump's

0:02:01.600 --> 0:02:04.960
<v Speaker 3>executive orders are enforced. It's gonna be one of many questions.

0:02:05.000 --> 0:02:06.760
<v Speaker 3>We don't know how many payrolls camp be met. We

0:02:06.760 --> 0:02:09.560
<v Speaker 3>don't know how many different firms are ultimately going to

0:02:09.560 --> 0:02:13.000
<v Speaker 3>be affected by this, how many commercial real estate properties

0:02:13.000 --> 0:02:14.959
<v Speaker 3>that are currently housing people are suddenly going to be

0:02:14.960 --> 0:02:16.080
<v Speaker 3>faced with their bills on paid.

0:02:16.200 --> 0:02:17.520
<v Speaker 2>We just don't know is.

0:02:17.480 --> 0:02:20.080
<v Speaker 4>The best advice for an investor to try to ignore

0:02:20.120 --> 0:02:22.280
<v Speaker 4>the noise and focus on the fundamentals. Where we have

0:02:22.360 --> 0:02:25.040
<v Speaker 4>earnings this week, maybe that's really what matters.

0:02:25.120 --> 0:02:27.040
<v Speaker 3>Well, we do have earnings, and I heard earlier the

0:02:27.040 --> 0:02:30.200
<v Speaker 3>commentary about, you know, we're excited that ASML's orders are

0:02:30.240 --> 0:02:33.160
<v Speaker 3>off the charts. But remember ASML's reporting off of a

0:02:33.200 --> 0:02:36.880
<v Speaker 3>December quarter deep seat came out on this this past week,

0:02:37.240 --> 0:02:39.400
<v Speaker 3>we've also known that this was kind of the case, right.

0:02:39.440 --> 0:02:42.080
<v Speaker 3>This is very much like the development of you know,

0:02:42.160 --> 0:02:45.280
<v Speaker 3>multiple signals and amplification that happened in fiber optics that

0:02:45.440 --> 0:02:47.320
<v Speaker 3>change the tone around fiber optics.

0:02:47.440 --> 0:02:49.480
<v Speaker 2>I got to go here. Alisa helped me out here,

0:02:49.880 --> 0:02:53.520
<v Speaker 2>T mobiles out well, Lisa's one of Lisa's entourage, whispered

0:02:53.560 --> 0:02:55.519
<v Speaker 2>in my ear, go to our inn T mobile. I

0:02:55.560 --> 0:02:59.040
<v Speaker 2>mean it's plus plus two twenty one and it's up seven.

0:02:58.760 --> 0:03:02.000
<v Speaker 5>Dollars now, yeah, earning smash expectations for it. So I

0:03:02.040 --> 0:03:04.520
<v Speaker 5>wanted to look, let's check in Core.

0:03:05.160 --> 0:03:08.359
<v Speaker 2>Do you know I pay a mortgage payment to remember

0:03:08.440 --> 0:03:12.120
<v Speaker 2>Vince Ferrell. Vince Ferrell was just such a great supporter

0:03:12.200 --> 0:03:15.120
<v Speaker 2>of Bloomberg surveillance. I miss him every day. We lost

0:03:15.200 --> 0:03:17.720
<v Speaker 2>Vince Ferrell way too long. We used to sit in

0:03:17.800 --> 0:03:20.919
<v Speaker 2>tears in the radio studio with Ken Pruitt and try

0:03:20.960 --> 0:03:24.000
<v Speaker 2>to figure out how many children their phone bills we

0:03:24.040 --> 0:03:30.280
<v Speaker 2>were paying and with t good Morning tea mobile mortgage payment? Help, Pa?

0:03:30.320 --> 0:03:32.560
<v Speaker 2>Why did you keep us going with Mike cream? Hey Mike,

0:03:32.639 --> 0:03:33.240
<v Speaker 2>So we sit here.

0:03:33.320 --> 0:03:36.160
<v Speaker 4>We had twenty twenty three and twenty twenty four both

0:03:36.760 --> 0:03:38.520
<v Speaker 4>north of twenty percent returns on the S and P

0:03:38.640 --> 0:03:41.240
<v Speaker 4>five hundred. How do you think about twenty twenty five

0:03:41.280 --> 0:03:43.960
<v Speaker 4>going into the year? I mean, should we just temper

0:03:44.000 --> 0:03:46.440
<v Speaker 4>that and hope for a single digit return? How do

0:03:46.440 --> 0:03:47.040
<v Speaker 4>you think about it?

0:03:47.120 --> 0:03:49.840
<v Speaker 3>Well, I'm often reminded of an event in late nineteen

0:03:49.920 --> 0:03:52.440
<v Speaker 3>ninety nine when I asked my mother in law, you know,

0:03:53.120 --> 0:03:55.440
<v Speaker 3>she'd had a phenomenal nineteen ninety nine. I said, you

0:03:55.440 --> 0:03:59.040
<v Speaker 3>know what if stocks were up fifteen percent in two thousand,

0:03:59.080 --> 0:04:01.560
<v Speaker 3>would you be surprised? Yeah, I'd be really surprised. I'm like, well,

0:04:01.560 --> 0:04:03.920
<v Speaker 3>then why not take something off the table? And her

0:04:03.960 --> 0:04:07.040
<v Speaker 3>reaction was, I'd be very surprised if they were only

0:04:07.120 --> 0:04:10.080
<v Speaker 3>up fifteen perccon right, So we're if you actually look

0:04:10.080 --> 0:04:11.600
<v Speaker 3>at what's happening in the market on a year to

0:04:11.680 --> 0:04:14.640
<v Speaker 3>day basis, a lot of the not mag seven stocks

0:04:14.720 --> 0:04:16.800
<v Speaker 3>in videos, the non in videos instead.

0:04:16.520 --> 0:04:17.600
<v Speaker 2>Of the world, they're up sharply.

0:04:17.640 --> 0:04:19.800
<v Speaker 3>The Dow is up almost eight percent ye before the

0:04:19.839 --> 0:04:21.280
<v Speaker 3>first month of the year is out of the way,

0:04:21.360 --> 0:04:22.960
<v Speaker 3>so it's hard to argue this is going to be

0:04:23.040 --> 0:04:23.920
<v Speaker 3>another calumn year.

0:04:24.200 --> 0:04:26.680
<v Speaker 4>We're going to hear from the Fed today Tom Keen

0:04:26.720 --> 0:04:28.720
<v Speaker 4>and the Surrounds team of full coverage starting a one

0:04:28.800 --> 0:04:32.160
<v Speaker 4>thirty pm Wall Street time. What do you should we

0:04:32.200 --> 0:04:34.440
<v Speaker 4>expect anything from the Fed this year or just kind

0:04:34.440 --> 0:04:37.080
<v Speaker 4>of sit on the signlines and follow the data.

0:04:37.160 --> 0:04:39.480
<v Speaker 3>You know, this is we definitely want to follow the data.

0:04:39.560 --> 0:04:41.160
<v Speaker 3>But one of the things that I think is really

0:04:41.200 --> 0:04:43.160
<v Speaker 3>critically is the market is only pricing about a ten

0:04:43.200 --> 0:04:46.000
<v Speaker 3>percent probability of a cut at this meeting. They're pricing

0:04:46.120 --> 0:04:48.320
<v Speaker 3>very low probability of the idea of a hike throughout

0:04:48.360 --> 0:04:51.120
<v Speaker 3>the year. That's backed off since obviously in video. But

0:04:52.160 --> 0:04:54.560
<v Speaker 3>if we look at that commentary that's going to come out,

0:04:54.760 --> 0:04:56.320
<v Speaker 3>this is where we're really going to find out what

0:04:56.320 --> 0:04:58.760
<v Speaker 3>the Fed is thinking. Agree, So we aren't going to

0:04:58.800 --> 0:05:00.560
<v Speaker 3>know what the press release. We know what's going to

0:05:00.600 --> 0:05:02.400
<v Speaker 3>happen the market. The FED is not going to surprise

0:05:02.480 --> 0:05:06.240
<v Speaker 3>the market there. Whether Palell chooses to react to the

0:05:06.279 --> 0:05:10.120
<v Speaker 3>first week of the Trump administration in terms of answering questions,

0:05:10.200 --> 0:05:14.680
<v Speaker 3>implications of it, inflation concerns, we genuinely just don't know.

0:05:14.800 --> 0:05:17.360
<v Speaker 2>I totally agree, totally agree. I just I just refuse

0:05:17.400 --> 0:05:19.360
<v Speaker 2>to believe it's a snooze fest with all that's going

0:05:19.360 --> 0:05:22.720
<v Speaker 2>on politically, and why you to treat Mike Green with

0:05:22.800 --> 0:05:26.479
<v Speaker 2>us to simplify, we continue here an extended conversation to

0:05:26.520 --> 0:05:29.800
<v Speaker 2>begin at your day. Many other worthies coming up at

0:05:29.839 --> 0:05:32.280
<v Speaker 2>the FED meeting and on the equity markets. Cam Dawson

0:05:32.320 --> 0:05:35.880
<v Speaker 2>will be with us later as well. The nastic Paul

0:05:36.040 --> 0:05:38.000
<v Speaker 2>up four tenths of a percent right now.

0:05:38.200 --> 0:05:40.480
<v Speaker 4>So, Michael, what do you expect here for earnings? If

0:05:40.480 --> 0:05:42.400
<v Speaker 4>if I've got a FED that's going to be the

0:05:42.520 --> 0:05:46.320
<v Speaker 4>kind of quiecent we're going to say for twenty twenty five,

0:05:46.360 --> 0:05:48.840
<v Speaker 4>maybe one, maybe two great rate cuts. That puts a

0:05:48.880 --> 0:05:50.520
<v Speaker 4>lot of pressure on earnings, doesn't it.

0:05:50.520 --> 0:05:52.080
<v Speaker 3>It does put pressure on earnings. And one of the

0:05:52.120 --> 0:05:54.640
<v Speaker 3>most important areas that puts pressure on earnings is actually

0:05:54.680 --> 0:05:57.239
<v Speaker 3>from not the leading companies, those companies that are flush

0:05:57.279 --> 0:05:59.680
<v Speaker 3>and cash, et cetera, but those companies that are now

0:05:59.720 --> 0:06:02.040
<v Speaker 3>facing refinancing. So if we look at things like the

0:06:02.080 --> 0:06:06.240
<v Speaker 3>high Yield Index, we've actually seen credit spreads compress. Many

0:06:06.279 --> 0:06:09.919
<v Speaker 3>of these companies have not refinanced that paper from the

0:06:09.960 --> 0:06:13.200
<v Speaker 3>twenty twenty twenty twenty one time period. You're now approaching

0:06:13.240 --> 0:06:16.560
<v Speaker 3>that maturity wall. And when these companies refinanced, even though

0:06:16.560 --> 0:06:19.120
<v Speaker 3>credit spreads are tight, the absolute level of interest rates

0:06:19.120 --> 0:06:20.520
<v Speaker 3>are a lot higher. So in many of these companies,

0:06:20.520 --> 0:06:21.960
<v Speaker 3>you're talking about going from four to four and a

0:06:22.000 --> 0:06:24.440
<v Speaker 3>half percent coupons to seven to seven and a half

0:06:24.520 --> 0:06:25.640
<v Speaker 3>or eight percent coupons.

0:06:25.760 --> 0:06:28.760
<v Speaker 2>Ma Green, how do you perceive Apple? On Monday, we

0:06:28.800 --> 0:06:32.160
<v Speaker 2>had a total full scale panic and everybody turned to

0:06:32.200 --> 0:06:38.080
<v Speaker 2>Cooper Tino and said, they're not doing the capex ballet.

0:06:37.760 --> 0:06:40.599
<v Speaker 2>Is that a heritage from Steve Jobs? Is that a

0:06:41.120 --> 0:06:43.720
<v Speaker 2>Tim Cook thing? Or is it blind luck Well.

0:06:43.720 --> 0:06:45.640
<v Speaker 3>I think it's a combination of components. So Apple has

0:06:45.640 --> 0:06:48.840
<v Speaker 3>always been a capital intensive, light business. They've always chosen

0:06:48.880 --> 0:06:52.560
<v Speaker 3>to outsource their manufacturing while keeping control of their intellectual property.

0:06:53.200 --> 0:06:55.640
<v Speaker 3>But I think the much more important message is nobody

0:06:55.680 --> 0:06:57.840
<v Speaker 3>lost their job on Monday, and so four oh one

0:06:57.920 --> 0:07:00.560
<v Speaker 3>k flows continue to come into the markets. Esters are

0:07:00.560 --> 0:07:03.000
<v Speaker 3>continuing to pile in. A lot of this is a

0:07:03.040 --> 0:07:05.159
<v Speaker 3>function of the autopilot of the way that we've set

0:07:05.200 --> 0:07:08.120
<v Speaker 3>up flows into our system. When people are working, they're

0:07:08.160 --> 0:07:10.680
<v Speaker 3>contributing to the stock market. That money is flowing into

0:07:10.720 --> 0:07:13.600
<v Speaker 3>an index fund, and guess what that index fund is buying?

0:07:14.520 --> 0:07:19.960
<v Speaker 2>Spring training February nine. The Dodgers play in Tokyo, so

0:07:20.000 --> 0:07:22.960
<v Speaker 2>they started early spring training. What inning are we in,

0:07:23.080 --> 0:07:24.480
<v Speaker 2>Mike Grain, of this bull market?

0:07:26.440 --> 0:07:28.400
<v Speaker 3>I have thought we've been in extended innings for an

0:07:28.440 --> 0:07:31.440
<v Speaker 3>extended period of time. A typical bear market bowl market

0:07:31.600 --> 0:07:34.680
<v Speaker 3>lasts for between three and five years, so we're probably

0:07:34.720 --> 0:07:35.720
<v Speaker 3>getting towards the end of it.

0:07:35.720 --> 0:07:36.520
<v Speaker 2>Am I yet.

0:07:36.360 --> 0:07:38.520
<v Speaker 3>Ready to call my mother in law and say you.

0:07:38.520 --> 0:07:40.960
<v Speaker 2>Must get out? Not quite. So.

0:07:41.240 --> 0:07:45.120
<v Speaker 4>We had some news earlier about this whole China AI thing,

0:07:45.240 --> 0:07:48.160
<v Speaker 4>and we're all trying to learn it literally on the fly.

0:07:48.920 --> 0:07:51.679
<v Speaker 4>AI has been a theme for this stock market really

0:07:51.880 --> 0:07:52.680
<v Speaker 4>a couple of years now.

0:07:52.720 --> 0:07:54.400
<v Speaker 2>It's been a supporter of growth and.

0:07:54.240 --> 0:07:56.000
<v Speaker 4>It just means so many positive things for so many

0:07:56.040 --> 0:07:59.800
<v Speaker 4>different industries. What's the assumption did anything change for you

0:07:59.840 --> 0:08:02.239
<v Speaker 4>with is deep seek news earlier this week.

0:08:02.440 --> 0:08:05.040
<v Speaker 3>Well, the fascinating thing is that the deep seek news

0:08:05.080 --> 0:08:09.480
<v Speaker 3>was actually out weeks ago, right so and candidly months ago.

0:08:09.600 --> 0:08:12.840
<v Speaker 3>So the key innovation was actually the handling of memory components.

0:08:13.320 --> 0:08:15.440
<v Speaker 3>They announced and released a paper in August of I

0:08:15.440 --> 0:08:17.400
<v Speaker 3>think it was actually August or July of last year

0:08:17.440 --> 0:08:20.240
<v Speaker 3>that actually highlighted these breakthroughs and a lot of this

0:08:20.280 --> 0:08:22.440
<v Speaker 3>stuff if you just think about it in an evolutionary terms,

0:08:22.520 --> 0:08:26.520
<v Speaker 3>is really straightforward. Can we do more computing with less energy?

0:08:26.840 --> 0:08:29.720
<v Speaker 3>Can we actually split up our brain into in terms

0:08:29.720 --> 0:08:32.320
<v Speaker 3>of a reptilian brain and an mammalian brain the Sarah

0:08:32.360 --> 0:08:35.240
<v Speaker 3>bellm etcetera. That's all we're doing with these components, their

0:08:35.320 --> 0:08:38.319
<v Speaker 3>natural evolutionary processes that simply say these things are getting

0:08:38.320 --> 0:08:40.760
<v Speaker 3>better and cheaper, et cetera. One stat I just wanted

0:08:40.800 --> 0:08:42.960
<v Speaker 3>to share with you, if you look at the actual

0:08:43.000 --> 0:08:46.199
<v Speaker 3>inflation adjusted price of an Apple two, the deep seat

0:08:46.520 --> 0:08:50.720
<v Speaker 3>innovations basically drop the cost of AI an LLM for

0:08:50.760 --> 0:08:53.440
<v Speaker 3>the average individual down to roughly the same inflation adjusted

0:08:53.480 --> 0:08:55.560
<v Speaker 3>costs as an Apple too in nineteen seventy seven, My

0:08:55.640 --> 0:08:56.040
<v Speaker 3>cream with.

0:08:56.120 --> 0:08:58.920
<v Speaker 2>Us to simplify, we're going to continue in extended conversation

0:08:59.040 --> 0:09:01.840
<v Speaker 2>to get us going futures up five red and green

0:09:01.840 --> 0:09:03.640
<v Speaker 2>in the screen. But I got a dancetick up four

0:09:03.720 --> 0:09:08.080
<v Speaker 2>tenths of a percent, Meta and Microsoft this afternoon, and

0:09:08.160 --> 0:09:10.720
<v Speaker 2>more importantly, Paul helped me in the eleven o'clock hour.

0:09:11.120 --> 0:09:14.000
<v Speaker 2>You have the chief executive officer of T Mobile.

0:09:14.080 --> 0:09:18.160
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I think so, absolutely eleven. I think we're good

0:09:18.200 --> 0:09:20.000
<v Speaker 4>on that. Hopefully he won't be coming with a collection

0:09:20.080 --> 0:09:21.760
<v Speaker 4>notice that. Yeah, so we'll get the latest. I mean

0:09:21.760 --> 0:09:25.679
<v Speaker 4>that telecom space, Tom, the wireless space. It's so competitive,

0:09:25.880 --> 0:09:26.880
<v Speaker 4>you know, but.

0:09:27.600 --> 0:09:31.240
<v Speaker 2>So competitive it's kill a millany exactly. You know, you

0:09:31.320 --> 0:09:33.559
<v Speaker 2>don't think, oh you get this, this it's all free,

0:09:33.559 --> 0:09:34.520
<v Speaker 2>free for you, and then.

0:09:34.800 --> 0:09:38.400
<v Speaker 4>Ninety days later it's like hello, yeah, exactly right, Hey Mike,

0:09:38.440 --> 0:09:39.880
<v Speaker 4>what screens well for you guys?

0:09:39.960 --> 0:09:41.600
<v Speaker 2>These days? Are you?

0:09:41.600 --> 0:09:44.240
<v Speaker 4>You know? Ever, I think probably the last ten to

0:09:44.280 --> 0:09:49.160
<v Speaker 4>fifteen years technology has led this market. Is technology still

0:09:49.160 --> 0:09:50.480
<v Speaker 4>going to leave this market going forward?

0:09:50.480 --> 0:09:52.760
<v Speaker 3>Do you think it's It's hard for me to see

0:09:52.840 --> 0:09:55.120
<v Speaker 3>leadership change in a very meaningful way because I spend

0:09:55.160 --> 0:09:57.560
<v Speaker 3>so much my time focused on the passive components and

0:09:57.600 --> 0:10:01.200
<v Speaker 3>these largest companies. There's a free that is created by

0:10:01.200 --> 0:10:03.600
<v Speaker 3>these orders, and so it just pushes the leadership further.

0:10:04.760 --> 0:10:07.800
<v Speaker 3>This Monday, when we had the news of deep seeking

0:10:07.880 --> 0:10:10.480
<v Speaker 3>the hit on Nvidia, I ruffled a lot of feathers

0:10:10.480 --> 0:10:11.959
<v Speaker 3>by saying, I just don't see why this is.

0:10:11.920 --> 0:10:13.520
<v Speaker 2>Going to change. And here we are two or three

0:10:13.559 --> 0:10:14.000
<v Speaker 2>days later.

0:10:14.040 --> 0:10:15.920
<v Speaker 3>Some of these are background charge and markets are being

0:10:16.000 --> 0:10:17.240
<v Speaker 3>led by the largest companies.

0:10:17.320 --> 0:10:19.960
<v Speaker 2>Well, how have ETFs changes in the fact that Mike

0:10:19.960 --> 0:10:22.840
<v Speaker 2>Green and I and Paul Sweeney. Yeah, I'm going back

0:10:22.880 --> 0:10:25.760
<v Speaker 2>to wheat for security now, way back. This is right

0:10:25.800 --> 0:10:29.200
<v Speaker 2>after the Confederacy pulled back comes Shenandoah Valley, and the

0:10:29.240 --> 0:10:34.720
<v Speaker 2>basic idea here is we used to rotate, blowney, we

0:10:34.800 --> 0:10:39.600
<v Speaker 2>don't rotate anymore. How have ETF's the dynamics changed that.

0:10:40.000 --> 0:10:42.920
<v Speaker 3>Well, it's interesting because you actually can see the rotation.

0:10:43.040 --> 0:10:45.880
<v Speaker 3>So immediately after Trump's election, we saw small caps take

0:10:45.880 --> 0:10:48.840
<v Speaker 3>off right and you saw the actual flows into things

0:10:48.880 --> 0:10:52.160
<v Speaker 3>like the IWM ETF. You can track the shares outstanding.

0:10:52.480 --> 0:10:55.320
<v Speaker 3>There's explosive buying of that. On this theory that we

0:10:55.320 --> 0:10:58.240
<v Speaker 3>should rotate, Well, guess what, once you've rotated.

0:10:58.280 --> 0:11:00.560
<v Speaker 2>What do you do next? Rotate?

0:11:00.679 --> 0:11:03.439
<v Speaker 3>And so small caps then saw people basically move away

0:11:03.440 --> 0:11:06.200
<v Speaker 3>from them, and the market went right back to doing

0:11:06.200 --> 0:11:08.560
<v Speaker 3>what it was doing before, which is the vast majority

0:11:08.559 --> 0:11:10.800
<v Speaker 3>of the flows are people who are not rotating, not

0:11:10.840 --> 0:11:13.800
<v Speaker 3>doing anything other than putting money in their paycheck into

0:11:13.800 --> 0:11:15.560
<v Speaker 3>the market on their four oh one case, on a

0:11:15.559 --> 0:11:16.880
<v Speaker 3>weekly basis or a bi weekly.

0:11:17.000 --> 0:11:19.640
<v Speaker 2>That's a second time you've mentioned that. I mean, the

0:11:19.640 --> 0:11:23.719
<v Speaker 2>financial media is ignoring Larry MacDonald was brilliant at this.

0:11:24.200 --> 0:11:29.160
<v Speaker 2>There's just this wall of money almost inputting into the

0:11:29.200 --> 0:11:32.839
<v Speaker 2>market on a daily basis, right, yeah, it really is.

0:11:32.880 --> 0:11:34.760
<v Speaker 3>And that money flows in and what is it by

0:11:34.800 --> 0:11:37.719
<v Speaker 3>the most of in Vidia, Apple, Microsoft, et cetera. Now

0:11:38.040 --> 0:11:40.760
<v Speaker 3>the relative shifts like things like in Vidia catching fire

0:11:40.800 --> 0:11:43.839
<v Speaker 3>and people waking up to it. That's actually exacerbated by

0:11:43.840 --> 0:11:46.640
<v Speaker 3>this because if you think about what ends up happening, right,

0:11:46.800 --> 0:11:48.760
<v Speaker 3>Tom Keen and his brilliance is like in video, it's

0:11:48.800 --> 0:11:50.840
<v Speaker 3>the future. I'm going to buy some of these shares. Well,

0:11:51.080 --> 0:11:53.600
<v Speaker 3>who's going to sell those shares to you? The passive

0:11:53.600 --> 0:11:55.680
<v Speaker 3>index fund will not sell those shares to you under

0:11:55.679 --> 0:11:58.840
<v Speaker 3>any conditions unless a general sellerator comes through. And so

0:11:58.880 --> 0:12:01.200
<v Speaker 3>you're competing with other people who are having the same insights.

0:12:01.200 --> 0:12:03.920
<v Speaker 3>That can cause that sort of sharp performance that we've seen.

0:12:04.320 --> 0:12:05.920
<v Speaker 3>But once it's there, it's kind of built in.

0:12:06.160 --> 0:12:08.040
<v Speaker 2>Mike Cree. One final question. You've got to get Michael

0:12:08.080 --> 0:12:10.560
<v Speaker 2>Barran here, but one final question. It is just simply

0:12:11.000 --> 0:12:16.360
<v Speaker 2>what do you say to our listeners and viewers in cash? Well?

0:12:17.559 --> 0:12:19.600
<v Speaker 3>This is a very challenging one, right because the fomo

0:12:19.760 --> 0:12:23.040
<v Speaker 3>component of watching your neighbor get rich is really really difficult.

0:12:23.280 --> 0:12:24.559
<v Speaker 2>I just keep emphasizing for.

0:12:24.480 --> 0:12:27.400
<v Speaker 3>People invest for what you need, not what your neighbor wants.

0:12:27.760 --> 0:12:29.960
<v Speaker 3>And the reality is is that we've got real interest

0:12:30.040 --> 0:12:32.360
<v Speaker 3>rates through tips and through duration at this point that

0:12:32.400 --> 0:12:36.000
<v Speaker 3>are attractive enough to allow many institutions and many households

0:12:36.000 --> 0:12:39.160
<v Speaker 3>to meet their objection their objectives in terms of retirements.

0:12:39.480 --> 0:12:41.520
<v Speaker 3>I just encourage people to make sure that you're thinking

0:12:41.520 --> 0:12:44.960
<v Speaker 3>about that income portion of your portfolio and recognizing that

0:12:45.080 --> 0:12:48.520
<v Speaker 3>the volatility that we are not seeing currently will eventually return.

0:12:48.880 --> 0:12:52.120
<v Speaker 2>Did you get enough time today? I did? Mike Green,

0:12:52.200 --> 0:12:54.640
<v Speaker 2>thank you so much. He's been in here, folks, like

0:12:54.720 --> 0:12:57.120
<v Speaker 2>three times. It's oh, Mike, I'm sorry you're on for

0:12:57.200 --> 0:13:00.720
<v Speaker 2>ninety seconds. That was great to have an extended conversation.

0:13:07.720 --> 0:13:11.319
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg surveillance podcast. Catch US live

0:13:11.360 --> 0:13:14.560
<v Speaker 1>weekday afternoons from seven to ten am Eastern Listen on

0:13:14.600 --> 0:13:18.280
<v Speaker 1>Applecarplay and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business app, or

0:13:18.440 --> 0:13:20.000
<v Speaker 1>watch us live on YouTube.

0:13:20.040 --> 0:13:22.200
<v Speaker 2>We have to talk to Amanda Linum of Black Rock

0:13:22.600 --> 0:13:25.960
<v Speaker 2>about adult material. But we got to do this first.

0:13:26.040 --> 0:13:28.840
<v Speaker 2>This YouTube thing I'm doing and Paul's doing. Our heads

0:13:28.840 --> 0:13:32.320
<v Speaker 2>are spinning. It's all new. C and End's dealing with it.

0:13:32.440 --> 0:13:35.880
<v Speaker 2>Everybody's dealing with YouTube, and we have a team that's

0:13:35.920 --> 0:13:38.600
<v Speaker 2>been brilliant. The word they use, Paul our colin of

0:13:38.640 --> 0:13:42.240
<v Speaker 2>the Twins says discoverability. Oh okay, And the biggest thing

0:13:42.320 --> 0:13:45.120
<v Speaker 2>I did is I switched to YouTube premium. It's one

0:13:45.200 --> 0:13:48.280
<v Speaker 2>hundred and sixty seven dollars a year. If you pay annually,

0:13:48.320 --> 0:13:50.960
<v Speaker 2>it's ten bucks a month. One twenty. Amanda, you did

0:13:50.960 --> 0:13:54.360
<v Speaker 2>the same thing. What's the difference you perceive in YouTube

0:13:54.400 --> 0:13:57.600
<v Speaker 2>premium versus regular run rate YouTube?

0:13:57.720 --> 0:13:59.559
<v Speaker 6>I love it and thank you for having me because

0:13:59.559 --> 0:14:01.640
<v Speaker 6>I can want you guys on two times the speed

0:14:01.640 --> 0:14:04.880
<v Speaker 6>without the commercials. So I can stay informed. Yes, so

0:14:04.920 --> 0:14:07.160
<v Speaker 6>I can stay informed. But it takes half the time,

0:14:07.200 --> 0:14:07.880
<v Speaker 6>and it's amazing.

0:14:07.880 --> 0:14:08.800
<v Speaker 2>It takes half the time.

0:14:10.880 --> 0:14:13.840
<v Speaker 7>Exactly, But I can you guys are so good that

0:14:13.880 --> 0:14:15.080
<v Speaker 7>I can follow along had.

0:14:17.000 --> 0:14:20.280
<v Speaker 2>Years of fixed in coming analysis. When you're listening at

0:14:20.360 --> 0:14:24.080
<v Speaker 2>two times the speed, how will you listen to Joe Prowl?

0:14:25.600 --> 0:14:30.720
<v Speaker 2>That's an idea the press conference in two times speedly,

0:14:31.400 --> 0:14:31.840
<v Speaker 2>what are you going.

0:14:31.840 --> 0:14:34.480
<v Speaker 7>To listen for today? I'm going to listen for two things.

0:14:34.520 --> 0:14:37.800
<v Speaker 6>One do we still think that policy is meaningfully restrictive?

0:14:38.120 --> 0:14:40.720
<v Speaker 6>And then two, what is the bar for cutting rates?

0:14:40.800 --> 0:14:43.480
<v Speaker 6>Is improvement and inflation enough for them to cut rates

0:14:44.040 --> 0:14:46.720
<v Speaker 6>or do they actually need to see further cooling in

0:14:46.760 --> 0:14:48.600
<v Speaker 6>the labor market. I think that will tell us a

0:14:48.600 --> 0:14:53.120
<v Speaker 6>bit about the forward path. I'm not expecting really a

0:14:53.200 --> 0:14:55.320
<v Speaker 6>cut to be on the table even in the March meeting,

0:14:55.360 --> 0:14:59.520
<v Speaker 6>because the January seasonality and inflation will probably distort the

0:14:59.560 --> 0:15:01.800
<v Speaker 6>numbers of But I do think that as we move

0:15:01.800 --> 0:15:03.400
<v Speaker 6>towards the second half of the year, we'll want to

0:15:03.400 --> 0:15:05.840
<v Speaker 6>see what the next action is in terms of an

0:15:05.840 --> 0:15:08.120
<v Speaker 6>extended pause or a cut across.

0:15:07.800 --> 0:15:10.080
<v Speaker 4>The fixed income community. This year to date, just so

0:15:10.120 --> 0:15:12.440
<v Speaker 4>far here in January, we have some positive returns here

0:15:12.520 --> 0:15:15.760
<v Speaker 4>led by high yield. What does the macro credit call

0:15:15.800 --> 0:15:17.000
<v Speaker 4>for you guys in twenty twenty five?

0:15:17.080 --> 0:15:19.000
<v Speaker 6>So I think the lesson from twenty twenty four is

0:15:19.000 --> 0:15:21.320
<v Speaker 6>that there was an opportunity cost to being too defensive,

0:15:22.000 --> 0:15:24.320
<v Speaker 6>and really our view on credit in twenty twenty fives

0:15:24.360 --> 0:15:25.840
<v Speaker 6>you just have to be very clear on why you're

0:15:25.840 --> 0:15:29.320
<v Speaker 6>buying credit. We're recommending that investors buy credit for carry

0:15:29.400 --> 0:15:32.560
<v Speaker 6>and for yield, not for the total return boost from,

0:15:32.760 --> 0:15:35.760
<v Speaker 6>for example, tightening and spreads or decline in rates. Spreads

0:15:35.760 --> 0:15:38.240
<v Speaker 6>are already quite tight, so there's not a ton of

0:15:38.320 --> 0:15:41.200
<v Speaker 6>room for absolute spread tightening from here. And our base

0:15:41.240 --> 0:15:43.680
<v Speaker 6>case is that structurally higher interest rates will prevail.

0:15:43.800 --> 0:15:44.880
<v Speaker 7>So if we do get.

0:15:44.720 --> 0:15:47.440
<v Speaker 6>A boost to total returns from those typical drivers and

0:15:47.480 --> 0:15:49.680
<v Speaker 6>total returns, that would be a bonus. But actually were

0:15:49.800 --> 0:15:51.840
<v Speaker 6>we see a pretty compelling opportunity from the all in

0:15:51.920 --> 0:15:53.720
<v Speaker 6>yield perspective and corporate credit.

0:15:53.800 --> 0:15:57.520
<v Speaker 4>How do you feel about investment grade versus high yield?

0:15:57.720 --> 0:16:00.760
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I actually am comfortable moving down the quality spectrum.

0:16:00.760 --> 0:16:03.080
<v Speaker 6>I would say for investors that can only play in

0:16:03.200 --> 0:16:05.920
<v Speaker 6>investment grade, triple b's are a nice option for that.

0:16:06.000 --> 0:16:07.960
<v Speaker 6>So moving down in the quality spectrum, I would say.

0:16:07.960 --> 0:16:10.160
<v Speaker 6>The big takeaway over the past few years, frankly, is

0:16:10.200 --> 0:16:13.160
<v Speaker 6>that there's a lot more fluidity between these markets. Actually,

0:16:13.160 --> 0:16:15.800
<v Speaker 6>if you look at credit metrics, between the high end

0:16:15.800 --> 0:16:18.240
<v Speaker 6>of high yield and the low end of IG, either're converging.

0:16:19.320 --> 0:16:21.400
<v Speaker 6>There's not a steep of a penalty for a company

0:16:21.440 --> 0:16:23.720
<v Speaker 6>to fall from IG to high yield. We're just seeing

0:16:23.760 --> 0:16:25.680
<v Speaker 6>a lot more of the blurring of the lines, and

0:16:25.720 --> 0:16:29.480
<v Speaker 6>so that line of demarcation between IG and high yield.

0:16:29.280 --> 0:16:31.160
<v Speaker 7>Is much less punitive than it used to be. We

0:16:31.200 --> 0:16:33.160
<v Speaker 7>actually like moving down in quality now.

0:16:33.240 --> 0:16:35.640
<v Speaker 6>I would say when you get into things like triple c's,

0:16:36.160 --> 0:16:40.000
<v Speaker 6>especially on triple C loans have underperformed because of certain

0:16:40.040 --> 0:16:43.040
<v Speaker 6>technicals related to colos and rating sensitivity, you have to

0:16:43.080 --> 0:16:43.960
<v Speaker 6>tread a bit carefully.

0:16:44.080 --> 0:16:45.840
<v Speaker 7>But in general we like credit risk.

0:16:45.880 --> 0:16:48.400
<v Speaker 6>And I looked at the Atlanta FED GDP now three

0:16:48.440 --> 0:16:52.280
<v Speaker 6>point two percent, solidly above trend, and so that's the

0:16:52.400 --> 0:16:55.200
<v Speaker 6>key for credit is the growth I totally.

0:16:54.800 --> 0:16:57.000
<v Speaker 2>This is my main theory. Is the number one thing

0:16:57.040 --> 0:17:00.680
<v Speaker 2>we've been wrong on has been the growth story is

0:17:00.720 --> 0:17:04.280
<v Speaker 2>a continuum. Does black Rock believe the growth story continues?

0:17:04.400 --> 0:17:04.840
<v Speaker 2>We do.

0:17:05.000 --> 0:17:07.439
<v Speaker 6>And I would say the one sign post to watch

0:17:07.480 --> 0:17:10.240
<v Speaker 6>because I think amid all of this uncertainty and volatility,

0:17:10.240 --> 0:17:12.399
<v Speaker 6>we just need to know what to watch for the

0:17:12.440 --> 0:17:15.920
<v Speaker 6>growth story has been hinged on the US consumer remaining resilient.

0:17:16.000 --> 0:17:18.360
<v Speaker 6>The pockets of weakness that we've seen have really been

0:17:18.359 --> 0:17:21.159
<v Speaker 6>confined to the low end. That's because the labor market

0:17:21.200 --> 0:17:24.680
<v Speaker 6>is in this kind of low hiring but low firing environment.

0:17:24.880 --> 0:17:27.040
<v Speaker 6>I think the key time for that to change is

0:17:27.040 --> 0:17:30.840
<v Speaker 6>that if corporates start flexing the layoff tool more aggressively,

0:17:31.400 --> 0:17:34.480
<v Speaker 6>that might allow the weakness in the consumer to extend

0:17:34.480 --> 0:17:37.359
<v Speaker 6>beyond that lower income cohort. And I think that could

0:17:37.359 --> 0:17:39.480
<v Speaker 6>be the risk to the US economy because we know

0:17:39.520 --> 0:17:41.600
<v Speaker 6>the consumer generates two thirds of GDP.

0:17:41.800 --> 0:17:43.879
<v Speaker 2>Paul Swedy Craig tourist joining us here in the nine

0:17:43.920 --> 0:17:48.880
<v Speaker 2>o'clock on that lower core. He's got some brilliant research.

0:17:49.280 --> 0:17:51.320
<v Speaker 4>Man, Are there some sectors that screen well for you

0:17:51.440 --> 0:17:52.080
<v Speaker 4>guys right now?

0:17:52.640 --> 0:17:54.280
<v Speaker 7>Folks still like financials.

0:17:54.680 --> 0:17:56.680
<v Speaker 6>I think when you think about some of the tailwes

0:17:56.720 --> 0:17:59.320
<v Speaker 6>in terms of a rebound in capital markets, activity, steeper

0:17:59.359 --> 0:18:04.399
<v Speaker 6>yield curve of you know, deregulation, possibly less exposure to

0:18:04.480 --> 0:18:05.800
<v Speaker 6>kind of global trade tensions.

0:18:06.200 --> 0:18:08.840
<v Speaker 4>Sally support their earnings on a Monday. They come out

0:18:08.880 --> 0:18:10.960
<v Speaker 4>Tuesday with these huge bomb offerings.

0:18:11.359 --> 0:18:12.120
<v Speaker 7>Do you pick up the phone?

0:18:12.119 --> 0:18:14.080
<v Speaker 6>There the new Yeah, the new issue market is a

0:18:14.119 --> 0:18:16.480
<v Speaker 6>really attractive way to put capital to work because those

0:18:16.520 --> 0:18:18.840
<v Speaker 6>deals often come at a spread concession, right, So that's

0:18:18.840 --> 0:18:21.159
<v Speaker 6>a that's a way that investors can kind of participate

0:18:22.000 --> 0:18:25.000
<v Speaker 6>in new issue pricings. Financials are a massive part of

0:18:25.000 --> 0:18:27.200
<v Speaker 6>the investment grade in next but even outside of financials,

0:18:27.240 --> 0:18:29.080
<v Speaker 6>I think there are a lot of sectors.

0:18:28.520 --> 0:18:32.360
<v Speaker 2>Career mortals buy new issue paper or is it like

0:18:32.400 --> 0:18:35.280
<v Speaker 2>the junior members of Blackguard? No, you can't have that,

0:18:35.359 --> 0:18:36.199
<v Speaker 2>Amanda has it.

0:18:36.920 --> 0:18:39.040
<v Speaker 7>The new issue markets are are wide open.

0:18:39.480 --> 0:18:41.720
<v Speaker 6>And actually, what we've seen, even with some of the

0:18:41.800 --> 0:18:46.280
<v Speaker 6>volatility in recent weeks, is that deals are multiple times oversubscribed,

0:18:46.480 --> 0:18:47.760
<v Speaker 6>trading well on the break.

0:18:47.560 --> 0:18:50.280
<v Speaker 7>And so those four times yeah.

0:18:49.720 --> 0:18:53.639
<v Speaker 6>So I think that's really and there's been some consternation

0:18:53.720 --> 0:18:55.680
<v Speaker 6>in the markets, obviously with some of the news flow

0:18:55.760 --> 0:18:58.000
<v Speaker 6>and whether or not we should read this to be

0:18:58.200 --> 0:19:00.760
<v Speaker 6>risk off. In terms of the rally treasuries that we saw,

0:19:01.119 --> 0:19:04.160
<v Speaker 6>credit spreads were incredibly well behaved, and in fact, the

0:19:04.200 --> 0:19:06.320
<v Speaker 6>modest widening that we saw on Monday has for the

0:19:06.320 --> 0:19:07.840
<v Speaker 6>most part been completely retraced.

0:19:08.040 --> 0:19:14.199
<v Speaker 2>Are yields now normal? This is a huge cultural question.

0:19:14.280 --> 0:19:16.880
<v Speaker 2>Are we getting back to normal or do you see

0:19:16.880 --> 0:19:18.320
<v Speaker 2>it vector towards lower end.

0:19:18.400 --> 0:19:22.240
<v Speaker 6>Yes, So our expectation is for a normalizing monetary policy cycle,

0:19:22.320 --> 0:19:24.960
<v Speaker 6>not an easing cycle. So on the front end policy rate,

0:19:25.160 --> 0:19:27.639
<v Speaker 6>we are not expecting to retrace to the zero lower

0:19:27.640 --> 0:19:29.680
<v Speaker 6>bound that was in place for much of the post

0:19:29.680 --> 0:19:32.040
<v Speaker 6>financial crisis era. At the long end of the curve,

0:19:32.119 --> 0:19:34.800
<v Speaker 6>we expect structurally higher rates there as well because of

0:19:34.840 --> 0:19:36.640
<v Speaker 6>an increase in term premium.

0:19:36.160 --> 0:19:37.400
<v Speaker 7>Focus on budget deficits.

0:19:37.480 --> 0:19:40.240
<v Speaker 6>So yes, I think we are in this high for

0:19:40.520 --> 0:19:44.879
<v Speaker 6>longer interest rate environment. However, corporates have been navigating this.

0:19:45.040 --> 0:19:50.600
<v Speaker 6>They've been refinancing into this new regime. They've been taking

0:19:50.720 --> 0:19:53.080
<v Speaker 6>actions to protect margins where they can to compensate for

0:19:53.160 --> 0:19:55.520
<v Speaker 6>higher deck costs. So it hasn't been as disruptive as

0:19:55.520 --> 0:19:56.960
<v Speaker 6>many market participants expected.

0:19:57.119 --> 0:20:00.600
<v Speaker 2>The next time you watch YouTube premium you put it

0:20:00.640 --> 0:20:01.520
<v Speaker 2>on three times.

0:20:01.600 --> 0:20:03.520
<v Speaker 7>I don't think actually that's an often Tom.

0:20:03.560 --> 0:20:06.640
<v Speaker 6>I think actually the max is too, So we're we're

0:20:06.640 --> 0:20:07.560
<v Speaker 6>at max.

0:20:10.040 --> 0:20:14.920
<v Speaker 2>Slow at that. Yes, Amandoliin and thank you so much

0:20:14.960 --> 0:20:17.800
<v Speaker 2>for your support through the year. Blue with black Rock

0:20:17.840 --> 0:20:20.119
<v Speaker 2>and mand Lenman had a macro credit research. You know,

0:20:20.200 --> 0:20:23.199
<v Speaker 2>he's smart, smart and where we're going to are you

0:20:23.240 --> 0:20:24.879
<v Speaker 2>and Jeff Rosenberg on speaking to him.

0:20:24.920 --> 0:20:25.800
<v Speaker 7>Of course he's wonderful.

0:20:25.840 --> 0:20:29.240
<v Speaker 2>Yes, it's wonderful. It's just good. He's up to four

0:20:29.280 --> 0:20:30.600
<v Speaker 2>people of Black Rocket like him.

0:20:30.640 --> 0:20:31.400
<v Speaker 4>It's nice.

0:20:31.400 --> 0:20:32.040
<v Speaker 2>It's amazing.

0:20:32.160 --> 0:20:34.560
<v Speaker 4>You know, it's much over in huts and yards with

0:20:34.640 --> 0:20:35.200
<v Speaker 4>the cool kids.

0:20:35.240 --> 0:20:38.639
<v Speaker 2>Now, oh really yeah? So so like the shop, is

0:20:38.640 --> 0:20:40.879
<v Speaker 2>it like painful? Because you want to shop?

0:20:41.440 --> 0:20:44.960
<v Speaker 7>It's beautiful, brand new, it's it's lovely. You should come over.

0:20:45.040 --> 0:20:47.840
<v Speaker 2>What's your favorite store there? What's the unknown store?

0:20:47.840 --> 0:20:51.359
<v Speaker 7>Too many to choose Tom Studio.

0:20:51.680 --> 0:20:56.800
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, there's a very Yeah, there's a lot of there's

0:20:56.800 --> 0:20:57.479
<v Speaker 6>a lot to choose from.

0:20:57.640 --> 0:21:01.640
<v Speaker 2>So you're you're walking around at leven Yeah, no, that's

0:21:01.680 --> 0:21:04.600
<v Speaker 2>not a good look. No, no one you think. Could

0:21:04.640 --> 0:21:07.760
<v Speaker 2>you see me in Lulu eleven Tights control room just

0:21:08.520 --> 0:21:11.840
<v Speaker 2>turning green? Amandolne, thank you so much for your support

0:21:12.160 --> 0:21:12.960
<v Speaker 2>with Black Red.

0:21:13.440 --> 0:21:17.360
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. Listen live each weekday

0:21:17.400 --> 0:21:20.800
<v Speaker 1>starting at seven am Eastern on Applecarplay and Android Auto

0:21:20.800 --> 0:21:23.800
<v Speaker 1>with the Bloomberg Business app. You can also listen live

0:21:23.840 --> 0:21:27.439
<v Speaker 1>on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station, Just

0:21:27.480 --> 0:21:30.000
<v Speaker 1>say Alexa play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:21:30.160 --> 0:21:32.639
<v Speaker 2>It is FED day with many distractions. I thought the

0:21:32.680 --> 0:21:36.120
<v Speaker 2>Microsoft and video thing there we just did was interesting.

0:21:36.240 --> 0:21:39.320
<v Speaker 2>Cam Dawson was lights many other guests today, But we

0:21:39.400 --> 0:21:43.520
<v Speaker 2>need to get back to the foundation of American macro strategy.

0:21:44.080 --> 0:21:47.439
<v Speaker 2>George Congalfis joins us right now from m UFG on

0:21:47.480 --> 0:21:50.320
<v Speaker 2>this FED day. Where are we going to be at

0:21:50.359 --> 0:21:52.760
<v Speaker 2>four o'clock, Georgia. And I don't mean like trying to

0:21:52.800 --> 0:21:57.560
<v Speaker 2>guess the press conference, but if it's a snooze fest,

0:21:57.760 --> 0:22:01.239
<v Speaker 2>I don't buy it. What will you listen to for

0:22:01.480 --> 0:22:06.720
<v Speaker 2>excitement in the press conference today? Good morning?

0:22:06.720 --> 0:22:09.439
<v Speaker 8>And look, I do think that as much as we

0:22:10.040 --> 0:22:12.679
<v Speaker 8>tend to think of FED events as these potential market

0:22:12.720 --> 0:22:15.480
<v Speaker 8>moving days, and they usually are, I think this is

0:22:15.560 --> 0:22:18.520
<v Speaker 8>one where it's the first meeting of the year. It's

0:22:18.560 --> 0:22:21.200
<v Speaker 8>the first meeting under the new Trump administration two point

0:22:21.280 --> 0:22:23.879
<v Speaker 8>zero world that we're in, and I really don't see

0:22:23.920 --> 0:22:27.760
<v Speaker 8>why Chairpal would want to convey anything that ruffles any feathers.

0:22:27.760 --> 0:22:30.320
<v Speaker 8>And I really do think that they're gonna just stick

0:22:30.359 --> 0:22:33.639
<v Speaker 8>to the script around DAT dependency and that they've largely

0:22:33.680 --> 0:22:35.840
<v Speaker 8>achieved a lot of their goals, but they're gonna this

0:22:35.840 --> 0:22:37.280
<v Speaker 8>is gonna be the first meeting by the way, they're

0:22:37.280 --> 0:22:39.840
<v Speaker 8>gonna skip in the normalization process. They cut one hundred

0:22:39.880 --> 0:22:42.240
<v Speaker 8>basis points last year. This will be the first skip.

0:22:42.320 --> 0:22:45.000
<v Speaker 8>So I think it's gonna be about explaining, like what

0:22:45.119 --> 0:22:46.920
<v Speaker 8>is the game plan for the coming months.

0:22:47.359 --> 0:22:51.080
<v Speaker 4>Will there be any language to suggest that they are

0:22:51.080 --> 0:22:54.359
<v Speaker 4>not committed to further rate cuts data dependent?

0:22:54.440 --> 0:22:54.760
<v Speaker 8>Of course?

0:22:54.760 --> 0:22:56.919
<v Speaker 4>Will there be any language suggests, hey, maybe there are

0:22:56.960 --> 0:23:00.440
<v Speaker 4>scenarios where we sit pat or maybe even rates.

0:23:01.560 --> 0:23:06.480
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, Look, we're we're leaning towards a very neutral message

0:23:06.560 --> 0:23:09.000
<v Speaker 8>out of chair Palell and just from the general statement

0:23:09.040 --> 0:23:11.120
<v Speaker 8>as well. I think it's too early to make that call.

0:23:11.840 --> 0:23:14.040
<v Speaker 8>That would be a surprise, definitely if they come out

0:23:14.119 --> 0:23:17.280
<v Speaker 8>come across as that the normalisition process was is a

0:23:17.320 --> 0:23:19.760
<v Speaker 8>done deal and it's gonna take it's and the bar

0:23:19.800 --> 0:23:21.560
<v Speaker 8>has been raised. I think that they don't want to

0:23:21.600 --> 0:23:23.399
<v Speaker 8>limit themselves so early on in the year, and so

0:23:23.480 --> 0:23:24.639
<v Speaker 8>I don't think that's the case.

0:23:25.560 --> 0:23:27.840
<v Speaker 4>So where do we think about just kind of macro

0:23:28.080 --> 0:23:32.440
<v Speaker 4>strategy here, given that backdrop, George, as we think about stocks, bonds, commodities,

0:23:32.440 --> 0:23:35.119
<v Speaker 4>where's your what's the macro call from you guys in

0:23:35.160 --> 0:23:36.680
<v Speaker 4>the beginning part of twenty twenty five.

0:23:37.160 --> 0:23:39.480
<v Speaker 8>Look, I mean, I think it's a it's a wait

0:23:39.520 --> 0:23:43.320
<v Speaker 8>and see staying very tactical, not really super strategic at

0:23:43.359 --> 0:23:46.359
<v Speaker 8>this point. It's it's really trying to understand what a

0:23:46.400 --> 0:23:49.440
<v Speaker 8>delay of the land going forward, and there's there's a

0:23:49.480 --> 0:23:51.119
<v Speaker 8>lot of jumper risk, there's a lot of uncertainty, and

0:23:51.160 --> 0:23:52.120
<v Speaker 8>we're still kind of going through.

0:23:52.480 --> 0:23:55.359
<v Speaker 2>I think it's I mean, George, don't go with that.

0:23:55.359 --> 0:23:58.919
<v Speaker 2>You're gonna grab the coupon and wait and see. But

0:23:59.040 --> 0:24:01.880
<v Speaker 2>what do you do down short term paper? Our listeners

0:24:01.880 --> 0:24:05.399
<v Speaker 2>and viewers in cash in three months they got the

0:24:05.440 --> 0:24:09.920
<v Speaker 2>Sweeney two year CD whatever. I mean, at that short duration,

0:24:10.920 --> 0:24:13.080
<v Speaker 2>you know, you can take the coupon, but you got

0:24:13.080 --> 0:24:15.720
<v Speaker 2>to make a call here, what does short duration do?

0:24:17.760 --> 0:24:20.240
<v Speaker 8>Look, I think that fixed Ittom still on the buy

0:24:20.280 --> 0:24:22.919
<v Speaker 8>and dips makes a lot of sense. We had that

0:24:23.400 --> 0:24:26.520
<v Speaker 8>rise in rates, it was unsustained, and as long as

0:24:26.520 --> 0:24:29.840
<v Speaker 8>that's the case, I think that we're okay with, you know,

0:24:29.880 --> 0:24:31.520
<v Speaker 8>buying on dips. But the problem is that we don't

0:24:31.560 --> 0:24:33.159
<v Speaker 8>have a dip right now. We're actually at the bottom

0:24:33.200 --> 0:24:35.320
<v Speaker 8>of the ranges, and I think we would like want

0:24:35.359 --> 0:24:37.920
<v Speaker 8>to look for either if data gets stronger in Q one,

0:24:38.080 --> 0:24:41.320
<v Speaker 8>if there are those animal spirits, the euphoria post election.

0:24:41.400 --> 0:24:44.080
<v Speaker 8>If they translate into activity, then rates are gonna go

0:24:44.119 --> 0:24:45.640
<v Speaker 8>back up again, and then that might be a chance

0:24:45.680 --> 0:24:46.000
<v Speaker 8>to buy.

0:24:47.119 --> 0:24:51.600
<v Speaker 4>So, George, where are where's your asset allocation these days?

0:24:51.640 --> 0:24:54.960
<v Speaker 4>I mean, and has it changed in recent period?

0:24:56.400 --> 0:24:56.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah?

0:24:56.640 --> 0:24:59.680
<v Speaker 8>So, look, we've been more defensive. I mean, credit I

0:24:59.680 --> 0:25:02.480
<v Speaker 8>think is basically priced in all the good news. You know,

0:25:02.520 --> 0:25:05.679
<v Speaker 8>you kind of neutral to on credit and mortgages are

0:25:05.680 --> 0:25:07.879
<v Speaker 8>probably that's still the one fixing come massa class that

0:25:07.920 --> 0:25:10.320
<v Speaker 8>has the most value, but it's at the mercy of

0:25:10.720 --> 0:25:13.000
<v Speaker 8>rate volatility in the shape of the yield curve until

0:25:13.000 --> 0:25:15.880
<v Speaker 8>we get more clarity on that. Mortgages are a good

0:25:15.960 --> 0:25:18.360
<v Speaker 8>product to buy, but really not the real time.

0:25:18.160 --> 0:25:19.040
<v Speaker 2>To do it at this point.

0:25:19.400 --> 0:25:22.320
<v Speaker 8>And so we're gonna be a relative defensive and looking

0:25:22.359 --> 0:25:24.040
<v Speaker 8>for for yield charge.

0:25:24.119 --> 0:25:26.159
<v Speaker 2>We'll tauch you at four pm. See if the world's

0:25:26.160 --> 0:25:28.399
<v Speaker 2>blown up church can call us with this out of

0:25:28.520 --> 0:25:30.760
<v Speaker 2>us macro strategy MUFG.

0:25:36.840 --> 0:25:40.719
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. Listen live each weekday

0:25:40.800 --> 0:25:44.199
<v Speaker 1>starting at seven am Eastern on Applecarplay and Android Auto

0:25:44.200 --> 0:25:47.040
<v Speaker 1>with the Bloomberg Business app. You can also watch us

0:25:47.080 --> 0:25:51.000
<v Speaker 1>live every weekday on YouTube and always on the Bloomberg terminal.

0:25:51.280 --> 0:25:53.399
<v Speaker 2>It is the newspaper, is it daily? Look at the

0:25:53.400 --> 0:25:56.639
<v Speaker 2>front pages at listam tall O moment, Lisa, what do

0:25:56.640 --> 0:25:56.879
<v Speaker 2>you have?

0:25:57.160 --> 0:25:58.639
<v Speaker 5>Okay, Tom, you're not gonna like this one.

0:25:58.680 --> 0:25:59.119
<v Speaker 7>I'm sorry.

0:25:59.200 --> 0:26:01.879
<v Speaker 5>This is in the New York Times national test scores

0:26:01.880 --> 0:26:05.400
<v Speaker 5>showing that the reading skills of American students continuing to fall.

0:26:06.200 --> 0:26:08.120
<v Speaker 5>Let me get to the numbers real quickly. The percentage

0:26:08.119 --> 0:26:10.959
<v Speaker 5>of eighth graders who have below basic reading skills, it

0:26:11.000 --> 0:26:13.359
<v Speaker 5>was the largest it's been in the exams three decade

0:26:13.440 --> 0:26:16.280
<v Speaker 5>in history. That's thirty three percent. It was forty percent

0:26:16.359 --> 0:26:19.359
<v Speaker 5>for fourth graders. There was some progress in math, but

0:26:19.480 --> 0:26:22.640
<v Speaker 5>it didn't just offset those losses. But the interesting thing

0:26:22.920 --> 0:26:25.879
<v Speaker 5>is the reason why the experts feel like this is happening.

0:26:25.920 --> 0:26:28.520
<v Speaker 5>They're just saying the increased screen time, more kids on

0:26:28.560 --> 0:26:32.000
<v Speaker 5>their phone, social media, school absences, all, you know, those

0:26:32.080 --> 0:26:35.520
<v Speaker 5>kind of distractions. They're watching more videos on their phone,

0:26:35.560 --> 0:26:37.320
<v Speaker 5>so they're reading less. You know, they're watching the video.

0:26:37.680 --> 0:26:40.719
<v Speaker 4>I'm I'm in the same pump. Yeah, I mean all

0:26:40.760 --> 0:26:42.080
<v Speaker 4>the time. I used to.

0:26:42.480 --> 0:26:44.000
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, we adults too.

0:26:44.040 --> 0:26:44.640
<v Speaker 5>I know it's true.

0:26:44.760 --> 0:26:48.840
<v Speaker 2>I see the books stacked up an afterthoughts, bedroom unread

0:26:49.680 --> 0:26:53.639
<v Speaker 2>and what I know? Is there something about finishing a

0:26:53.760 --> 0:26:56.280
<v Speaker 2>book it's gone.

0:26:57.240 --> 0:26:58.640
<v Speaker 5>I think it's the attention span.

0:26:59.040 --> 0:27:02.360
<v Speaker 2>I'm trying to do it. Example, I'm reading Rusher Sharma

0:27:02.480 --> 0:27:06.679
<v Speaker 2>right now, folks, fabulous book and capitalism. I'm reading David

0:27:06.760 --> 0:27:09.640
<v Speaker 2>McCullough on Paris just because I need to buy six

0:27:09.680 --> 0:27:13.440
<v Speaker 2>thousand square feet on the river sin blah blah blah. Paul,

0:27:13.480 --> 0:27:18.080
<v Speaker 2>you're reading books. The answer is, I'm trying by example

0:27:18.200 --> 0:27:22.119
<v Speaker 2>to show them to go cover to cover. It ain't working.

0:27:22.560 --> 0:27:23.840
<v Speaker 2>I'm going down in flames.

0:27:23.920 --> 0:27:26.040
<v Speaker 5>It's hard, but that's what they're saying. Because the screen

0:27:26.080 --> 0:27:28.199
<v Speaker 5>times are causing them to have less attention span. They

0:27:28.200 --> 0:27:31.000
<v Speaker 5>can't sit and finish a book and finish reading what

0:27:31.040 --> 0:27:31.920
<v Speaker 5>they're supposed.

0:27:31.560 --> 0:27:33.879
<v Speaker 2>To be reading. It's a huge deal. I don't know

0:27:33.920 --> 0:27:34.640
<v Speaker 2>what to do with it.

0:27:34.640 --> 0:27:35.280
<v Speaker 5>It's a big one.

0:27:35.560 --> 0:27:39.280
<v Speaker 2>I'm depressed. One. I got to go check TikTok.

0:27:39.400 --> 0:27:43.919
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, this wasn't interesting from the Wall Street Journal, New

0:27:44.000 --> 0:27:46.479
<v Speaker 5>York City co Ops not the status symbol that they

0:27:46.600 --> 0:27:49.000
<v Speaker 5>used to be. It has this really interesting read into it.

0:27:49.040 --> 0:27:52.520
<v Speaker 5>These are buildings that you know, sylmbolize this old money elegance, right,

0:27:52.560 --> 0:27:55.840
<v Speaker 5>we're talking about Park at Fifth Avenue, even Central Park West,

0:27:55.880 --> 0:27:58.520
<v Speaker 5>all those co ops because they're saying, younger buyers, they

0:27:58.520 --> 0:28:02.520
<v Speaker 5>want newer, flash your buildings downtown, they want to go downtown.

0:28:02.520 --> 0:28:04.600
<v Speaker 5>A lot of the colt buildings they're older, they're built

0:28:04.600 --> 0:28:07.840
<v Speaker 5>in the nineteen twenties. And then they're choosing the condos

0:28:07.920 --> 0:28:09.360
<v Speaker 5>have fewer rules because the.

0:28:09.320 --> 0:28:12.320
<v Speaker 7>Co ops have a lot the co op process.

0:28:12.119 --> 0:28:14.000
<v Speaker 5>Than the co op process. I'm reading about it.

0:28:14.000 --> 0:28:16.720
<v Speaker 2>It's I applied to a co op, did you get

0:28:16.840 --> 0:28:19.359
<v Speaker 2>fancy one? Like? You know, I would have been the

0:28:19.400 --> 0:28:22.639
<v Speaker 2>poorest person in the building, and I was. I was

0:28:22.720 --> 0:28:25.159
<v Speaker 2>insulted by what they wanted from me.

0:28:25.680 --> 0:28:28.200
<v Speaker 7>I said, no way, And that's that's what a lot

0:28:28.200 --> 0:28:28.720
<v Speaker 7>of people do.

0:28:29.200 --> 0:28:32.200
<v Speaker 2>My entire tax return and that was a year where

0:28:32.280 --> 0:28:34.040
<v Speaker 2>Vet Bill, you know, I had a business that went

0:28:34.119 --> 0:28:36.680
<v Speaker 2>under someone's like fifty four pages, said you know, I'm

0:28:36.720 --> 0:28:37.320
<v Speaker 2>not doing that.

0:28:37.480 --> 0:28:39.000
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, they could order to pay all cashs.

0:28:39.040 --> 0:28:41.400
<v Speaker 2>It's also that they're new and slick in their downtown.

0:28:42.640 --> 0:28:46.360
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it's not just co op. Right, squeeze in

0:28:46.400 --> 0:28:46.680
<v Speaker 2>one more?

0:28:46.880 --> 0:28:47.440
<v Speaker 7>Okay, one more?

0:28:47.480 --> 0:28:51.440
<v Speaker 5>Oh, this one's a dagger Pooksatani Phil's groundhog Day job

0:28:51.640 --> 0:28:56.440
<v Speaker 5>would be in jeopardy. Okay, Peter is suggesting a vegan.

0:28:56.480 --> 0:28:57.920
<v Speaker 7>Weather revealed cake.

0:29:00.080 --> 0:29:02.240
<v Speaker 5>You would love this because they want to retire him

0:29:02.280 --> 0:29:04.880
<v Speaker 5>to a sanctuary. That's what they're asking. They're saying, Phil,

0:29:05.160 --> 0:29:09.680
<v Speaker 5>he's exploited. He would be happier living in his natural habitat.

0:29:10.360 --> 0:29:13.200
<v Speaker 5>So the blue would mean six more weeks of winter.

0:29:13.360 --> 0:29:15.760
<v Speaker 5>The pink would mean an early spring. And that's how

0:29:15.880 --> 0:29:19.800
<v Speaker 5>the cake, the vegan cake would work instead of pusatani.

0:29:19.600 --> 0:29:21.800
<v Speaker 2>Disappoint Can the president do something about this?

0:29:23.000 --> 0:29:26.960
<v Speaker 5>In here ground Homeday, Sunday, Sunday Sunday.

0:29:27.440 --> 0:29:31.000
<v Speaker 4>Okay, Okay, that's why I know what this arm is

0:29:31.040 --> 0:29:31.840
<v Speaker 4>gonna say.

0:29:32.880 --> 0:29:34.440
<v Speaker 5>I've been there reporting.

0:29:37.400 --> 0:29:37.720
<v Speaker 2>Section.

0:29:37.960 --> 0:29:39.720
<v Speaker 7>You know that I was there at the.

0:29:39.720 --> 0:29:42.200
<v Speaker 2>Statue of our mayors have their handbit.

0:29:42.920 --> 0:29:44.160
<v Speaker 5>I actually did.

0:29:45.400 --> 0:29:50.160
<v Speaker 2>He was there for that one. The beast.

0:29:52.280 --> 0:29:53.040
<v Speaker 5>Hell together.

0:29:53.160 --> 0:29:53.920
<v Speaker 7>It was very impressive.

0:29:54.120 --> 0:29:56.480
<v Speaker 2>Hold on your badge, Lisa, Thank you so much, The

0:29:56.600 --> 0:29:59.520
<v Speaker 2>Newspapers with Lisa Matteo.

0:30:00.000 --> 0:30:04.760
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast, available on Apple, Spotify,

0:30:04.920 --> 0:30:08.680
<v Speaker 1>and anywhere else you get your podcasts. Listen live each

0:30:08.720 --> 0:30:12.280
<v Speaker 1>weekday seven to ten am Eastern on Bloomberg dot com,

0:30:12.720 --> 0:30:16.480
<v Speaker 1>the iHeartRadio app, Tune in and the Bloomberg Business app.

0:30:16.800 --> 0:30:19.880
<v Speaker 1>You can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube

0:30:20.240 --> 0:30:22.200
<v Speaker 1>and always on the Bloomberg terminal