WEBVTT - Listener Mail: In Your Face!

0:00:03.000 --> 0:00:04.960
<v Speaker 1>Welcome Stuff to Blow Your Mind, a production of I

0:00:05.000 --> 0:00:13.840
<v Speaker 1>Heart Radios How Stuff Works. Hey, you, welcome to Stuff

0:00:13.880 --> 0:00:16.079
<v Speaker 1>to Blow your Mind. My name is Robert Lamb and

0:00:16.160 --> 0:00:18.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm Joe McCormick, and we're bringing you a listener mail.

0:00:19.560 --> 0:00:21.239
<v Speaker 1>That's right. It's been a little while we've had some

0:00:21.280 --> 0:00:24.640
<v Speaker 1>great listener mail build up and so we are here

0:00:24.680 --> 0:00:27.520
<v Speaker 1>to share it with you and help us share the

0:00:27.680 --> 0:00:32.600
<v Speaker 1>listener mail love. We have as always Carney our mail bought. Uh, Carney,

0:00:32.640 --> 0:00:38.000
<v Speaker 1>say hi to the audience now. Carney. Uh, you know

0:00:38.080 --> 0:00:40.400
<v Speaker 1>he always listens into our topics and then of course

0:00:40.400 --> 0:00:43.680
<v Speaker 1>he feeds off of the listener mail and he you know,

0:00:43.720 --> 0:00:47.600
<v Speaker 1>he was really into our series on facial recognition software,

0:00:47.640 --> 0:00:50.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, because he is mostly software. But he was

0:00:50.680 --> 0:00:54.000
<v Speaker 1>also very interested in my question I raised about whether

0:00:54.120 --> 0:00:58.480
<v Speaker 1>dogs have faces. As we're a number of listeners. Yeah,

0:00:58.520 --> 0:01:01.960
<v Speaker 1>it's it's stirred up some I don't know, debate. I

0:01:01.960 --> 0:01:04.480
<v Speaker 1>guess you could say on online about whether dogs have faces.

0:01:04.520 --> 0:01:06.680
<v Speaker 1>Now mostly it's just people saying yes, I think dogs

0:01:06.680 --> 0:01:09.840
<v Speaker 1>have faces. And here's why, Um, I don't feel particularly

0:01:09.920 --> 0:01:13.720
<v Speaker 1>strongly about it myself. I just merely commented that I

0:01:13.760 --> 0:01:16.160
<v Speaker 1>just tend not to think of the front of a

0:01:16.200 --> 0:01:20.120
<v Speaker 1>dog's skull as being a face. I certainly see is

0:01:20.160 --> 0:01:22.640
<v Speaker 1>having eyes and a mouth and a nose and so forth.

0:01:22.680 --> 0:01:25.560
<v Speaker 1>But I still cannot believe this. This is the weirdest

0:01:25.560 --> 0:01:27.640
<v Speaker 1>thing you ever said. But it's not just dogs, it's

0:01:27.680 --> 0:01:30.080
<v Speaker 1>just you know, animals in general, um, that are not

0:01:30.720 --> 0:01:34.600
<v Speaker 1>human or nearly so at any rate. It apparently messed

0:01:34.600 --> 0:01:36.399
<v Speaker 1>with Carney a little bit as well, because now he

0:01:36.480 --> 0:01:42.200
<v Speaker 1>was obsessively going around scanning the fronts of dogs skulls

0:01:42.760 --> 0:01:45.840
<v Speaker 1>and trying to put together some sort of facial recognition

0:01:46.400 --> 0:01:48.680
<v Speaker 1>argument based off of that. Just wait till he gets

0:01:48.680 --> 0:01:51.200
<v Speaker 1>to the buck flower dog from Invasion of the Body Snatchers.

0:01:51.200 --> 0:01:53.440
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, that's gonna really throw him for a curve,

0:01:53.520 --> 0:02:02.080
<v Speaker 1>isn't it. I gotta give shout out. Seth reminded us

0:02:02.120 --> 0:02:04.360
<v Speaker 1>of that one that is the best human face dog

0:02:04.400 --> 0:02:07.120
<v Speaker 1>of all time? Wasn't there one in there was like

0:02:07.400 --> 0:02:10.240
<v Speaker 1>a similar film from the seventies that had to do

0:02:10.360 --> 0:02:15.680
<v Speaker 1>with witchcraft, like alan Alda and It or something. Oh,

0:02:15.720 --> 0:02:18.760
<v Speaker 1>this is ringing bells. Yeah, I just looked it up.

0:02:18.800 --> 0:02:21.760
<v Speaker 1>It's called the Mephisto Waltz. I've never seen this one

0:02:22.040 --> 0:02:24.200
<v Speaker 1>looks really good. You know, I don't think I ever

0:02:24.480 --> 0:02:27.200
<v Speaker 1>saw it in its entirety either, but back when I

0:02:27.240 --> 0:02:29.760
<v Speaker 1>was watching a lot of Sci Fi Channel, back in

0:02:29.800 --> 0:02:32.120
<v Speaker 1>the old days of Sci Fi Channel, when they spelled

0:02:32.120 --> 0:02:36.160
<v Speaker 1>it correctly, um, they would hopeful for it with Siffycifia.

0:02:36.680 --> 0:02:38.480
<v Speaker 1>They would have a lot of promos for you know,

0:02:38.560 --> 0:02:40.360
<v Speaker 1>these films that they had the rights to show, and

0:02:40.400 --> 0:02:42.280
<v Speaker 1>one of them was The Mephisto Waltz and I think

0:02:42.320 --> 0:02:46.800
<v Speaker 1>they showed the the Faced Dog creature in that trailer

0:02:47.080 --> 0:02:50.120
<v Speaker 1>right in the middle of the Forever Night marathon. I

0:02:50.120 --> 0:02:51.920
<v Speaker 1>don't know if I don't think they were showing Forever

0:02:52.040 --> 0:02:53.520
<v Speaker 1>Night at that point. This is back when they were

0:02:53.560 --> 0:02:57.320
<v Speaker 1>all about it was classic Doctor Who and also occasional

0:02:57.520 --> 0:03:02.000
<v Speaker 1>like shows like what Man I'm Manimal? Was that it

0:03:02.240 --> 0:03:06.840
<v Speaker 1>sequest I don't know, maybe se Quest definitely, Time Tunnel

0:03:07.680 --> 0:03:12.760
<v Speaker 1>shows like that, movies like Gargoyle Space was another one

0:03:12.800 --> 0:03:14.360
<v Speaker 1>that got a lot of play. So what was the

0:03:14.360 --> 0:03:19.400
<v Speaker 1>one with the car the car that could talk? Night Writer? Yes, yes,

0:03:19.600 --> 0:03:21.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't remember if Night Writers on there or not.

0:03:21.919 --> 0:03:24.000
<v Speaker 1>We'll stay tuned for the new podcast series Robert and

0:03:24.000 --> 0:03:26.919
<v Speaker 1>I are soon launching about classic sci Fi Channel programming.

0:03:27.280 --> 0:03:28.919
<v Speaker 1>I would love to do that podcast. I don't know

0:03:28.960 --> 0:03:30.960
<v Speaker 1>anyone else wants to listen to it. Oh my god,

0:03:31.000 --> 0:03:34.480
<v Speaker 1>I would make that in my free time. Uh No,

0:03:34.639 --> 0:03:37.320
<v Speaker 1>but today is about stuff to blow your mind, and

0:03:37.360 --> 0:03:39.560
<v Speaker 1>it is about stuff to blow your mind listener mail.

0:03:40.040 --> 0:03:42.400
<v Speaker 1>We Yeah, we received a lot of great stuff related

0:03:42.440 --> 0:03:46.840
<v Speaker 1>to the face recognition episodes, certainly, but also volcanoes was

0:03:46.880 --> 0:03:49.000
<v Speaker 1>a big topic. Yeah, a bunch of stuff. I guess

0:03:49.240 --> 0:03:51.360
<v Speaker 1>we could start by addressing one thing we got a

0:03:51.400 --> 0:03:53.720
<v Speaker 1>bunch of mail about. We may have brought this up

0:03:53.720 --> 0:03:56.080
<v Speaker 1>on the website before, but I figure here's a good

0:03:56.160 --> 0:03:58.640
<v Speaker 1>time to say. A lot of people have just emailed saying, hey,

0:03:58.640 --> 0:04:01.800
<v Speaker 1>where's your website? Or like, I'm looking for source lists

0:04:01.920 --> 0:04:04.240
<v Speaker 1>links that would be on the landing page for this episode.

0:04:04.320 --> 0:04:07.119
<v Speaker 1>Can you help me find them? Sorry, folks, our website

0:04:07.160 --> 0:04:10.040
<v Speaker 1>has been led off to the website Slaughterhouse. It is

0:04:10.200 --> 0:04:13.840
<v Speaker 1>no more. That's right. Yeah, and this I believe happened

0:04:13.880 --> 0:04:16.760
<v Speaker 1>for all the shows that you know that are in

0:04:16.800 --> 0:04:19.440
<v Speaker 1>the you know what was previously known as the Stuff Network.

0:04:19.920 --> 0:04:21.560
<v Speaker 1>Uh So, now, if you got to Stuff to Build

0:04:21.560 --> 0:04:23.200
<v Speaker 1>your Mind dot com, if you go to invention pod

0:04:23.240 --> 0:04:24.919
<v Speaker 1>dot com, or if you go to the websites for

0:04:24.960 --> 0:04:27.279
<v Speaker 1>shows like stuff you should know or stuff you missed

0:04:27.279 --> 0:04:29.960
<v Speaker 1>in history class, those will direct to i Heart listings

0:04:30.000 --> 0:04:32.880
<v Speaker 1>for that show. Right now, To be clear, we don't

0:04:32.880 --> 0:04:34.719
<v Speaker 1>want you to be alarmed. This doesn't mean anything about

0:04:34.720 --> 0:04:37.039
<v Speaker 1>the show itself. The show is not going away anything

0:04:37.080 --> 0:04:40.400
<v Speaker 1>like that. It's just my Heart doesn't have individual websites

0:04:40.440 --> 0:04:44.400
<v Speaker 1>for its podcasts, and they enforced that on our show

0:04:44.440 --> 0:04:47.440
<v Speaker 1>among all others. Now, and if you're looking for like

0:04:47.880 --> 0:04:51.080
<v Speaker 1>lists of resources that were used in a particular episode,

0:04:51.120 --> 0:04:53.400
<v Speaker 1>I guess the good news there is that we kind

0:04:53.400 --> 0:04:57.080
<v Speaker 1>of sucked at doing that anyway, especially recently, so there

0:04:57.120 --> 0:04:59.120
<v Speaker 1>wasn't a lot of There wasn't a lot lost in

0:04:59.160 --> 0:05:00.960
<v Speaker 1>that regard. I think the ain thing that was that

0:05:01.120 --> 0:05:03.599
<v Speaker 1>was lost is that we had a you know, we

0:05:03.640 --> 0:05:06.719
<v Speaker 1>had a pretty good, uh, you know, searchable archive system

0:05:06.760 --> 0:05:08.880
<v Speaker 1>of past episodes. It was a good way to go

0:05:08.920 --> 0:05:11.120
<v Speaker 1>back and look at post past episodes. And there were

0:05:11.120 --> 0:05:13.360
<v Speaker 1>a lot of blog posts on there from over the years.

0:05:13.680 --> 0:05:17.600
<v Speaker 1>But I had not been actively blogging for you know,

0:05:17.640 --> 0:05:21.600
<v Speaker 1>at least a year, so um and no ongoing blogging

0:05:21.640 --> 0:05:24.800
<v Speaker 1>efforts were interrupted on that count. Oh and while the

0:05:24.839 --> 0:05:27.600
<v Speaker 1>website is no longer accessible. They assure us that it's

0:05:27.640 --> 0:05:30.960
<v Speaker 1>still somewhere in the dark space, and that means that,

0:05:31.160 --> 0:05:33.240
<v Speaker 1>for all we know, it could return in the future.

0:05:34.040 --> 0:05:37.240
<v Speaker 1>It's just not there right now. But if there's something particular,

0:05:37.440 --> 0:05:40.200
<v Speaker 1>something specific you were looking for, you can always just

0:05:40.279 --> 0:05:42.520
<v Speaker 1>email us and ask. And you know, if it's a

0:05:42.640 --> 0:05:44.599
<v Speaker 1>question about a source, we use like, hey, what was

0:05:44.640 --> 0:05:46.679
<v Speaker 1>that book you mentioned? How do you spelled that author's

0:05:46.760 --> 0:05:49.280
<v Speaker 1>last name? Uh, we can will generally be able to

0:05:49.320 --> 0:05:50.919
<v Speaker 1>get back to you and let you know, we'll do

0:05:51.000 --> 0:05:53.560
<v Speaker 1>our best right and likewise, if you're trying to remember,

0:05:53.680 --> 0:05:55.600
<v Speaker 1>like if you are thinking back to a blog post

0:05:55.640 --> 0:05:57.080
<v Speaker 1>and you're like, oh, what was that blog post? What

0:05:57.120 --> 0:06:00.000
<v Speaker 1>was that topic? Uh, you know, ask us via email

0:06:00.160 --> 0:06:02.080
<v Speaker 1>and you know, maybe we can fish that up for you.

0:06:02.360 --> 0:06:05.520
<v Speaker 1>You know, no promises, but uh, sometimes we can retrieve

0:06:05.560 --> 0:06:08.640
<v Speaker 1>that information certainly. So I guess it's time to jump

0:06:08.680 --> 0:06:11.440
<v Speaker 1>into the listener messages now. As always, we've got a

0:06:11.440 --> 0:06:13.600
<v Speaker 1>preface this by saying we're sorry. We get so much

0:06:13.640 --> 0:06:16.640
<v Speaker 1>wonderful mail. There is no way, uh in heck, for

0:06:16.760 --> 0:06:18.800
<v Speaker 1>us to read it all or even get close. This

0:06:18.839 --> 0:06:21.040
<v Speaker 1>will just have to be a small selection of messages,

0:06:21.080 --> 0:06:22.920
<v Speaker 1>but we appreciate all the mail we get. If your

0:06:22.920 --> 0:06:26.520
<v Speaker 1>message was not featured, please don't take it personally. Right

0:06:26.560 --> 0:06:29.040
<v Speaker 1>again and maybe you'll get on next time. But this

0:06:29.080 --> 0:06:32.520
<v Speaker 1>first message concerns our pair of episodes about the eruption

0:06:32.560 --> 0:06:39.520
<v Speaker 1>of Mount Vesuvius. This comes from Seth. Seth says, hi, there.

0:06:39.560 --> 0:06:41.719
<v Speaker 1>My name is Seth, and I'm a park ranger at

0:06:41.760 --> 0:06:46.560
<v Speaker 1>Mount Rainier National Park. Specifically, my job title is climbing ranger.

0:06:46.880 --> 0:06:49.800
<v Speaker 1>That means my duties include staffing the high camps and

0:06:49.839 --> 0:06:53.040
<v Speaker 1>climbing the mountain many times each spring and summer. I've

0:06:53.080 --> 0:06:55.600
<v Speaker 1>also worked for twelve years as a climbing guide on

0:06:55.680 --> 0:06:58.479
<v Speaker 1>Mountain Rainier and many other mountains all over the world,

0:06:58.520 --> 0:07:01.120
<v Speaker 1>including many of the ones on your list of volcanoes

0:07:01.160 --> 0:07:04.440
<v Speaker 1>at the end of Lessons of Vesuvius Part two. WHOA,

0:07:05.120 --> 0:07:07.680
<v Speaker 1>I spent a lot of time living, climbing, skiing, and

0:07:07.720 --> 0:07:10.840
<v Speaker 1>working on an active volcano, and so I really enjoyed

0:07:10.880 --> 0:07:13.760
<v Speaker 1>the Vesuvius series, although the description of the victims at

0:07:13.760 --> 0:07:17.200
<v Speaker 1>Pompeii and Herculaneum did give me serious pause. As I

0:07:17.280 --> 0:07:20.440
<v Speaker 1>work and live both on and near Mount Rainier. Yikes,

0:07:20.880 --> 0:07:23.800
<v Speaker 1>I would prefer my brain tissue to remain un vitrified.

0:07:23.960 --> 0:07:27.080
<v Speaker 1>Thank you. I was also surprised that Mount Rainier did

0:07:27.120 --> 0:07:29.880
<v Speaker 1>not make your list of volcanoes with large populations living

0:07:29.880 --> 0:07:33.440
<v Speaker 1>in close proximity. It is the only decade volcano in

0:07:33.480 --> 0:07:36.160
<v Speaker 1>the continental USA, and there are millions of people that

0:07:36.200 --> 0:07:39.160
<v Speaker 1>would be affected if the volcano were to erupt. I

0:07:39.160 --> 0:07:42.240
<v Speaker 1>guess the main issue, though, is really the lahars that

0:07:42.280 --> 0:07:46.480
<v Speaker 1>would form from pyroclastic flows melting the largest glacier system

0:07:46.760 --> 0:07:49.520
<v Speaker 1>in the lower forty eight and scouring dirt, rock and

0:07:49.560 --> 0:07:52.400
<v Speaker 1>debris from the river valleys and carrying them all the

0:07:52.440 --> 0:07:56.440
<v Speaker 1>way to tide water, not the explosion of the volcano itself.

0:07:56.480 --> 0:07:59.120
<v Speaker 1>Your podcast really got me wondering why I have felt

0:07:59.200 --> 0:08:03.239
<v Speaker 1>drawn to this mountain. I've spent nearly twenty years climbing, skiing,

0:08:03.280 --> 0:08:06.880
<v Speaker 1>and working on it, and the steaming fumaroles, sulfur seeps,

0:08:06.880 --> 0:08:09.840
<v Speaker 1>and crater ice caves always inspire a sense of wonder

0:08:09.920 --> 0:08:13.200
<v Speaker 1>and awe, even after more than two hundred times climbing

0:08:13.240 --> 0:08:16.400
<v Speaker 1>the summit. I really enjoyed the episodes, so thanks for that.

0:08:16.680 --> 0:08:18.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm also really hoping you do one on the year

0:08:18.760 --> 0:08:21.080
<v Speaker 1>without a summer. As an avid skier, I would love

0:08:21.120 --> 0:08:23.160
<v Speaker 1>to have a year like that, just as long as

0:08:23.160 --> 0:08:27.360
<v Speaker 1>we don't have any boathouse situations. Best regards, Seth, Well,

0:08:27.400 --> 0:08:30.040
<v Speaker 1>thanks for getting in touch, Seth. The mention of Lahars

0:08:30.120 --> 0:08:32.640
<v Speaker 1>actually brings me back to something that we did talk

0:08:32.640 --> 0:08:35.280
<v Speaker 1>about in one of our Vesuvius episodes where we mentioned

0:08:35.280 --> 0:08:39.760
<v Speaker 1>the volcano Catla in Iceland, which is near the village

0:08:39.760 --> 0:08:42.200
<v Speaker 1>of vik Has down on the southern coast of Iceland,

0:08:42.440 --> 0:08:44.200
<v Speaker 1>and I was talking about how I had been there,

0:08:44.600 --> 0:08:46.840
<v Speaker 1>and Katla is in a similar situation to what you're

0:08:46.840 --> 0:08:49.160
<v Speaker 1>talking about there, the threat is not so much of

0:08:49.200 --> 0:08:53.360
<v Speaker 1>an explosive eruption like Vesuvius. The threat is changed by

0:08:53.400 --> 0:08:56.520
<v Speaker 1>the fact that the volcano there lies under this vast glacier.

0:08:56.679 --> 0:08:59.800
<v Speaker 1>So try to imagine what happens when a volcano erupts

0:09:00.040 --> 0:09:03.840
<v Speaker 1>under millions of tons of ice. The greatest danger from

0:09:03.960 --> 0:09:06.800
<v Speaker 1>eruptions here comes from Lahars again. You know, these these

0:09:06.840 --> 0:09:09.560
<v Speaker 1>floods of mud and water coming out of the glacier

0:09:09.600 --> 0:09:13.320
<v Speaker 1>system and from a yokolaps. Oh, these are the the

0:09:13.360 --> 0:09:17.880
<v Speaker 1>ice giants, right, Yeah, these are these outburst floods from glaciers. Uh,

0:09:18.160 --> 0:09:20.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, so like there might be a lake that

0:09:20.840 --> 0:09:23.240
<v Speaker 1>is fed by the flow off of a glacier as

0:09:23.240 --> 0:09:26.600
<v Speaker 1>it melts. But then suddenly lots of heat melts a

0:09:26.600 --> 0:09:30.079
<v Speaker 1>lot of glacial water, and that then the lake breaches

0:09:30.240 --> 0:09:34.600
<v Speaker 1>whatever container it's normally held in and there's rapid draining.

0:09:34.920 --> 0:09:37.600
<v Speaker 1>So a lot of times we don't even imagine properly

0:09:37.720 --> 0:09:41.000
<v Speaker 1>what the most destructive elements of a volcanic eruption would be.

0:09:41.040 --> 0:09:44.720
<v Speaker 1>And one of the funniest things is that people often think, Okay,

0:09:44.760 --> 0:09:48.560
<v Speaker 1>the danger of a volcanic eruption comes from flows of lava.

0:09:48.679 --> 0:09:51.319
<v Speaker 1>That's like one of the least dangers to worry about.

0:09:51.800 --> 0:09:53.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, certainly, if you were in the position to

0:09:53.800 --> 0:09:57.080
<v Speaker 1>be affected by the flowing lava, it's dangerous. But but yeah,

0:09:57.080 --> 0:09:59.520
<v Speaker 1>it's all these other factors, and ultimately it's in many

0:09:59.559 --> 0:10:02.120
<v Speaker 1>of the scenari as we mentioned, it's it's what happens

0:10:02.120 --> 0:10:04.440
<v Speaker 1>when then the population flees. Where are they going, what

0:10:04.520 --> 0:10:07.040
<v Speaker 1>are the what kind of conditions are in place for

0:10:07.120 --> 0:10:12.800
<v Speaker 1>them to actually evacuate the area. All right, here's another one.

0:10:13.120 --> 0:10:16.439
<v Speaker 1>This one comes to us from Derek Derek Rites. Hey, guys,

0:10:16.480 --> 0:10:19.160
<v Speaker 1>just finished listening to Lessons of Vessuvious Part two and

0:10:19.240 --> 0:10:22.280
<v Speaker 1>had an experience to share my wife and I visit

0:10:22.360 --> 0:10:25.400
<v Speaker 1>Hawaii every few years, not as often as I'd like.

0:10:26.040 --> 0:10:28.000
<v Speaker 1>During one of our trips, we rented a house in

0:10:28.000 --> 0:10:30.960
<v Speaker 1>a community just outside of Pahoa on the Big Island.

0:10:31.160 --> 0:10:34.240
<v Speaker 1>It was fantastic. Later I learned that in two thousand eighteen,

0:10:34.600 --> 0:10:38.360
<v Speaker 1>several rifts opened not to even two ms away from

0:10:38.360 --> 0:10:41.320
<v Speaker 1>the house where we stayed. Needless to say, it is

0:10:41.400 --> 0:10:44.640
<v Speaker 1>long gone. During our twenty nineteen trip, I was excited

0:10:44.679 --> 0:10:47.000
<v Speaker 1>to see if I could estimate the location of our

0:10:47.040 --> 0:10:50.559
<v Speaker 1>former getaway by visiting the lava field. I certainly could

0:10:50.600 --> 0:10:53.920
<v Speaker 1>have located at using a GPS, But every place at

0:10:53.920 --> 0:10:56.760
<v Speaker 1>which the a road encountered the lava flow, there were

0:10:56.760 --> 0:11:00.000
<v Speaker 1>many signs warning that venturing into the area was both

0:11:00.120 --> 0:11:03.839
<v Speaker 1>dangerous and illegal. I read, what do you think he

0:11:03.880 --> 0:11:09.000
<v Speaker 1>should have the signs? Obey the sign? Having been to

0:11:09.440 --> 0:11:12.400
<v Speaker 1>volcano Volcano National Park. Don't be one of those people

0:11:12.400 --> 0:11:14.920
<v Speaker 1>who disregards the sign. I know, I okay, so you

0:11:14.960 --> 0:11:17.520
<v Speaker 1>did you know? Yes, obey the signs, do not cross

0:11:17.559 --> 0:11:21.280
<v Speaker 1>over into the dangerous area. But I'm one who constitutionally,

0:11:21.440 --> 0:11:24.040
<v Speaker 1>by nature, is drawn into areas that you are not

0:11:24.080 --> 0:11:28.959
<v Speaker 1>allowed to go into. Well, I understand that, yes, anyway,

0:11:28.960 --> 0:11:32.000
<v Speaker 1>he continues, I read that the area is still private property,

0:11:32.200 --> 0:11:34.720
<v Speaker 1>and walking out onto the lava would have been trespassing.

0:11:36.760 --> 0:11:39.679
<v Speaker 1>I was amazed at two other observations of the surrounding area.

0:11:39.840 --> 0:11:42.320
<v Speaker 1>One more than a year after the lava flow, there

0:11:42.360 --> 0:11:45.160
<v Speaker 1>are still areas of the field so hot that steam

0:11:45.200 --> 0:11:48.400
<v Speaker 1>pours from brakes in the crust. Too. I saw many

0:11:48.679 --> 0:11:52.800
<v Speaker 1>dozens of instances of trees already sprouting from the field,

0:11:53.040 --> 0:11:57.000
<v Speaker 1>tiny palm seedlings amidst the black landscape, taking keen advantage

0:11:57.000 --> 0:12:01.240
<v Speaker 1>of the lack of competition and nutrients. I'm sure really

0:12:01.280 --> 0:12:05.120
<v Speaker 1>which astounds me more the devastating destructive power or life

0:12:05.240 --> 0:12:09.120
<v Speaker 1>a blatant disregard for it. Thanks guys, keep up the

0:12:09.120 --> 0:12:12.080
<v Speaker 1>good work, Derek. That reminds me of the stories of

0:12:12.480 --> 0:12:17.679
<v Speaker 1>the forests pouring into the caldera on Vesuvius. Uh. Life

0:12:17.720 --> 0:12:20.160
<v Speaker 1>not only finds a way, life almost just kind of

0:12:20.200 --> 0:12:24.600
<v Speaker 1>gives a middle finger to the geologic danger. The I

0:12:24.640 --> 0:12:26.880
<v Speaker 1>have to drive him again though that you know, anyone

0:12:26.920 --> 0:12:29.440
<v Speaker 1>out there, if you have the opportunity to visit the

0:12:29.440 --> 0:12:33.120
<v Speaker 1>Big Island and go to Volcano National Park, uh or,

0:12:33.720 --> 0:12:36.560
<v Speaker 1>it's I just highly recommended. I went there once many

0:12:36.640 --> 0:12:39.120
<v Speaker 1>years ago, and I haven't had the chance to go

0:12:39.160 --> 0:12:41.840
<v Speaker 1>back yet, but I hope to because it's it's just

0:12:42.120 --> 0:12:44.840
<v Speaker 1>it's it's it's amazing experience to be able to walk

0:12:44.920 --> 0:12:49.320
<v Speaker 1>through these volcanic craters, uh, To to like look down

0:12:49.320 --> 0:12:51.680
<v Speaker 1>into a crater and see a complete rainbow below you

0:12:51.760 --> 0:12:53.800
<v Speaker 1>in the crater, or walk through a crater and see

0:12:53.840 --> 0:12:57.360
<v Speaker 1>the rainbow overhead and like pass beneath it and then

0:12:57.400 --> 0:13:00.680
<v Speaker 1>look back and see it behind you. And to interact

0:13:00.720 --> 0:13:04.800
<v Speaker 1>with these environments that you feel like you're in another world. Uh.

0:13:04.840 --> 0:13:08.280
<v Speaker 1>And then to see either you know, direct signs or

0:13:08.320 --> 0:13:12.080
<v Speaker 1>these other signs of the you know, intense volcanic activity

0:13:12.120 --> 0:13:15.600
<v Speaker 1>of the living earth right there beneath you. It's it's

0:13:15.720 --> 0:13:17.640
<v Speaker 1>unlike anything else. Do you want to move on to

0:13:17.720 --> 0:13:20.720
<v Speaker 1>Karma Mudah? Yeah, let's move on to that, that wonderful,

0:13:20.800 --> 0:13:26.319
<v Speaker 1>warm feeling of Karma Muda. Okay, here come the warm fields.

0:13:26.360 --> 0:13:29.880
<v Speaker 1>This first message is from Helen. Helen says, high stuff

0:13:29.920 --> 0:13:32.559
<v Speaker 1>to blow your mind. Love. Your work keeps me entertained

0:13:32.559 --> 0:13:36.120
<v Speaker 1>and educated, and more importantly, indulges my intellectual curiosity in

0:13:36.160 --> 0:13:39.160
<v Speaker 1>a contained way. I won't know what that means. Contained

0:13:39.200 --> 0:13:43.440
<v Speaker 1>way within the limits of the podcast, episode The Limits

0:13:43.480 --> 0:13:47.920
<v Speaker 1>of Sanity. Helen says, the recent episode on Karma Muda

0:13:47.960 --> 0:13:50.760
<v Speaker 1>reminds me of another feeling which hasn't a direct English

0:13:50.840 --> 0:13:54.479
<v Speaker 1>language correlate. It's one of my three personal life principles.

0:13:54.679 --> 0:13:57.520
<v Speaker 1>A gope this is an ancient Greek word and is

0:13:57.600 --> 0:14:01.880
<v Speaker 1>usually interpreted in a Christian context, is godlike love. But

0:14:01.960 --> 0:14:05.400
<v Speaker 1>I was taught that it means unconditional love between humans,

0:14:05.640 --> 0:14:09.280
<v Speaker 1>which is reliant upon nothing except the shared existence. The

0:14:09.320 --> 0:14:11.880
<v Speaker 1>best example I can think of is showing love and

0:14:11.920 --> 0:14:14.959
<v Speaker 1>care and compassion for someone even when there is hate

0:14:15.000 --> 0:14:18.960
<v Speaker 1>between them, treating your enemies with respect and mercy simply

0:14:19.000 --> 0:14:21.880
<v Speaker 1>because they are also human. It's hard to do to

0:14:22.000 --> 0:14:25.520
<v Speaker 1>transcend the secondary feelings one has for another person, and

0:14:25.560 --> 0:14:28.840
<v Speaker 1>it sometimes seems futile and grudging. But having been on

0:14:28.880 --> 0:14:31.640
<v Speaker 1>the receiving end of it before, I can attest it's

0:14:31.680 --> 0:14:33.520
<v Speaker 1>one of the things that could make a difference in

0:14:33.560 --> 0:14:36.320
<v Speaker 1>a single person's life, So I try to practice it

0:14:36.360 --> 0:14:39.320
<v Speaker 1>where I can. Thanks again, don't ever stop making us think.

0:14:41.960 --> 0:14:43.920
<v Speaker 1>All right, here's another listener mail Lion comes to us

0:14:43.920 --> 0:14:48.040
<v Speaker 1>from Kelly. Also on Karma Muda, Kelly riots Hi, Robert

0:14:48.040 --> 0:14:50.040
<v Speaker 1>and Joe. I love the episode on Karma Muda. As

0:14:50.040 --> 0:14:52.720
<v Speaker 1>a musician and a music teacher, I have tried to

0:14:52.720 --> 0:14:55.680
<v Speaker 1>describe this emotion so often and can never quite find

0:14:55.680 --> 0:14:58.200
<v Speaker 1>the words for it. I recently got back into playing

0:14:58.200 --> 0:15:00.800
<v Speaker 1>with an ensemble, which I really missed. I would often

0:15:00.800 --> 0:15:03.440
<v Speaker 1>try to articulate what I love about playing with a

0:15:03.480 --> 0:15:05.760
<v Speaker 1>group that I couldn't get from playing alone, but I

0:15:05.840 --> 0:15:09.040
<v Speaker 1>never felt that my explanation captured exactly what I was feeling.

0:15:09.400 --> 0:15:12.160
<v Speaker 1>Listening to this episode, I realized that karma muta was

0:15:12.240 --> 0:15:15.040
<v Speaker 1>exactly what I was trying to convey. Creating music with

0:15:15.080 --> 0:15:19.800
<v Speaker 1>a group provides that sense of camaraderie, shared experiences, goose pumps,

0:15:19.800 --> 0:15:24.440
<v Speaker 1>and often quote a sudden upwelling of uncontrollable happiness to

0:15:24.600 --> 0:15:27.880
<v Speaker 1>use Joe's words. Even though I won't likely use the

0:15:27.960 --> 0:15:30.720
<v Speaker 1>term karma muda and everyday conversation, I do feel that

0:15:30.880 --> 0:15:34.840
<v Speaker 1>understanding the term actually has helped me understand the feeling better.

0:15:34.960 --> 0:15:36.560
<v Speaker 1>Thank you both for the hard work you put into

0:15:36.600 --> 0:15:39.640
<v Speaker 1>the podcast every week. That'st which is Kelly having played

0:15:39.640 --> 0:15:42.760
<v Speaker 1>in a band, I absolutely know what Kelly's talking about.

0:15:42.800 --> 0:15:45.640
<v Speaker 1>This feeling of like when when you kind of lock

0:15:45.760 --> 0:15:48.840
<v Speaker 1>in and suddenly everything's going right when you're playing music

0:15:48.880 --> 0:15:52.720
<v Speaker 1>with other people, especially, I feel like in improvising music,

0:15:53.160 --> 0:15:56.080
<v Speaker 1>like if there's a moment where you're improvising music with

0:15:56.120 --> 0:15:59.400
<v Speaker 1>other people and everybody like makes a change at the

0:15:59.440 --> 0:16:02.000
<v Speaker 1>same time. I'm it's like that sudden moment where you

0:16:02.000 --> 0:16:04.720
<v Speaker 1>you feel as if there's some kind of telepathy between

0:16:04.760 --> 0:16:06.880
<v Speaker 1>you and you can get goose bumps, the feeling in

0:16:06.920 --> 0:16:10.680
<v Speaker 1>the chest. It's very powerful. Interesting. I've never had that experience.

0:16:10.680 --> 0:16:12.720
<v Speaker 1>I was never like in a garage band or anything

0:16:12.760 --> 0:16:16.040
<v Speaker 1>like that, but but certainly in the more structured sense

0:16:16.080 --> 0:16:20.000
<v Speaker 1>of just the communal creation of music, um, you know,

0:16:20.040 --> 0:16:23.360
<v Speaker 1>with the high school band for example, and then UM

0:16:23.480 --> 0:16:26.240
<v Speaker 1>and occasionally like church choir, is that sort of thing,

0:16:26.320 --> 0:16:30.720
<v Speaker 1>like the community communal singing opportunities. I can very much

0:16:30.800 --> 0:16:33.720
<v Speaker 1>understand what Kelly is talking about here. Yeah, I mean,

0:16:33.960 --> 0:16:36.960
<v Speaker 1>all kinds of music are I think, very strongly inherently

0:16:37.080 --> 0:16:42.360
<v Speaker 1>unifying whenever you perform with other people. Yeah, Okay. This

0:16:42.440 --> 0:16:46.000
<v Speaker 1>next message comes from Vicky. Vicky says, Dear Robert and Joe,

0:16:46.040 --> 0:16:47.880
<v Speaker 1>I've been listening to stuff Table in your mind since

0:16:48.920 --> 0:16:51.640
<v Speaker 1>and listening to inventions since it started. Thank you for

0:16:51.680 --> 0:16:54.600
<v Speaker 1>all the thought provoking topics. I really enjoyed the Kamma

0:16:54.640 --> 0:16:56.840
<v Speaker 1>Mudah show, and I wanted to add another reason why

0:16:56.880 --> 0:16:59.520
<v Speaker 1>someone might want a word for this feeling. Since the

0:16:59.560 --> 0:17:02.760
<v Speaker 1>feeling can be overwhelming to some of us, we can

0:17:02.840 --> 0:17:05.399
<v Speaker 1>disarm it a bit if we have a word. I

0:17:05.440 --> 0:17:08.919
<v Speaker 1>have a few personal experiences of creating a word for this. First,

0:17:08.960 --> 0:17:12.159
<v Speaker 1>when I was a teenager growing up in Wisconsin, my

0:17:12.240 --> 0:17:15.000
<v Speaker 1>dad and I were watching some kind of nature documentary

0:17:15.040 --> 0:17:18.719
<v Speaker 1>with baby animals surviving against odds, which created a strong

0:17:18.840 --> 0:17:21.680
<v Speaker 1>feeling of karma mudah. But I didn't want to cry.

0:17:21.720 --> 0:17:23.960
<v Speaker 1>I was a teenager, and I looked at my dad,

0:17:24.000 --> 0:17:26.280
<v Speaker 1>who was also trying not to cry. He was an

0:17:26.280 --> 0:17:30.600
<v Speaker 1>American man, and he said, it's heartwarming, and that made

0:17:30.640 --> 0:17:34.200
<v Speaker 1>us both laugh. After that, heartwarming was our secret code

0:17:34.240 --> 0:17:37.000
<v Speaker 1>for when we saw something that brought up those feelings

0:17:37.320 --> 0:17:40.200
<v Speaker 1>and we could laugh instead of crying. This is interesting

0:17:40.200 --> 0:17:42.960
<v Speaker 1>and the idea that that you're feeling that essentially the

0:17:43.040 --> 0:17:45.960
<v Speaker 1>Kama move to so strongly that it must be expressed.

0:17:46.240 --> 0:17:48.520
<v Speaker 1>There has to be an an outlet for it. It

0:17:48.880 --> 0:17:52.040
<v Speaker 1>reminds me of some of the I believe it was

0:17:52.040 --> 0:17:53.719
<v Speaker 1>a past episode I can't remember. I recorded this one

0:17:53.760 --> 0:17:55.840
<v Speaker 1>with you or maybe this was a Julie episode, but

0:17:55.920 --> 0:17:59.800
<v Speaker 1>about the desire to to bite a baby, because it's

0:17:59.800 --> 0:18:03.159
<v Speaker 1>so cute that this was with Julia. Okay, yeah, uh

0:18:03.200 --> 0:18:05.720
<v Speaker 1>and and as I recall, the argument here was, yeah,

0:18:05.720 --> 0:18:08.760
<v Speaker 1>you're just so overcome with this feeling and it needs

0:18:08.800 --> 0:18:12.359
<v Speaker 1>out in some way, and like the best you can

0:18:12.440 --> 0:18:14.720
<v Speaker 1>sometimes do is to like reach out and like pinch

0:18:14.800 --> 0:18:18.120
<v Speaker 1>the child to just sort of deflate the overwhelming sense

0:18:18.160 --> 0:18:21.320
<v Speaker 1>of kama muda. And this sounds oddly similar. Uh, you know,

0:18:21.359 --> 0:18:24.440
<v Speaker 1>it's like, there's this we're feeling something, something is happening.

0:18:24.920 --> 0:18:27.760
<v Speaker 1>We have to say it. We have to transform it

0:18:27.840 --> 0:18:31.199
<v Speaker 1>into transfigure it into some other emotion, otherwise it's going

0:18:31.240 --> 0:18:34.239
<v Speaker 1>to destroy us. Yes. She tells another example about this

0:18:34.280 --> 0:18:37.359
<v Speaker 1>that I think is interesting. So this one also involves singing.

0:18:37.440 --> 0:18:40.760
<v Speaker 1>So she says, Now, I live in Tokyo. I've been

0:18:40.760 --> 0:18:42.960
<v Speaker 1>here for more than twenty five years, married to a

0:18:43.080 --> 0:18:46.840
<v Speaker 1>Japanese man. I belong to an association of quote foreign

0:18:46.920 --> 0:18:51.159
<v Speaker 1>wives women currently are formally partnered with a Japanese person,

0:18:51.520 --> 0:18:54.040
<v Speaker 1>and we gather once a year from all across Japan

0:18:54.119 --> 0:18:56.960
<v Speaker 1>for a weekend convention. It's always a great time, but

0:18:57.000 --> 0:18:59.920
<v Speaker 1>it always closes on Sunday morning with the ceremony where

0:19:00.000 --> 0:19:03.000
<v Speaker 1>everyone holds hands and sings a song written by one

0:19:03.040 --> 0:19:07.440
<v Speaker 1>of the members Total Karma Muda. I find it too overwhelming,

0:19:07.680 --> 0:19:10.879
<v Speaker 1>so several years back I started sneaking out just before

0:19:10.920 --> 0:19:13.280
<v Speaker 1>the singing, and I found several other women doing the

0:19:13.320 --> 0:19:15.960
<v Speaker 1>same thing. So now we plan it. We talk about

0:19:15.960 --> 0:19:18.600
<v Speaker 1>when to make our escape, a timely visit to the restroom,

0:19:18.640 --> 0:19:22.199
<v Speaker 1>for example, to avoid the singing. We all know what

0:19:22.320 --> 0:19:24.919
<v Speaker 1>the singing means. It's not the singing itself. I go

0:19:24.960 --> 0:19:27.639
<v Speaker 1>out to karaoke with some of these people. It's that

0:19:27.800 --> 0:19:33.040
<v Speaker 1>overwhelming feeling. Japanese has a word for that feeling, kendao,

0:19:33.320 --> 0:19:37.960
<v Speaker 1>literally emotions moving, and people use it fairly often in conversation.

0:19:38.240 --> 0:19:40.520
<v Speaker 1>When I first came here, I was surprised that people

0:19:40.560 --> 0:19:43.840
<v Speaker 1>would say in English that something had moved them, but

0:19:43.920 --> 0:19:48.199
<v Speaker 1>eventually I realized they were just translating the Japanese word uh.

0:19:48.280 --> 0:19:50.920
<v Speaker 1>And at the end, she recommends a video that invokes

0:19:51.080 --> 0:19:54.440
<v Speaker 1>mild Karma Muda. It's a promotional video made by the

0:19:54.480 --> 0:19:57.520
<v Speaker 1>Kanagawa Prefecture that involves a lot of people from the

0:19:57.640 --> 0:20:01.400
<v Speaker 1>area singing and dancing in costume. To this one pop song.

0:20:01.480 --> 0:20:06.119
<v Speaker 1>It is indeed extremely cute and very sweet. But this

0:20:06.200 --> 0:20:08.320
<v Speaker 1>is really interesting because she talks about all these these

0:20:08.400 --> 0:20:11.159
<v Speaker 1>multiple methods, both like having a kind of code word,

0:20:11.200 --> 0:20:14.280
<v Speaker 1>but then also having a kind of avoidance ritual, all

0:20:14.359 --> 0:20:18.240
<v Speaker 1>for avoiding situations that are going to cause that karma

0:20:18.280 --> 0:20:21.199
<v Speaker 1>muda reaction, the goose bumps, the tears, the you know,

0:20:21.280 --> 0:20:24.959
<v Speaker 1>the warmness in the chest, because sometimes it's too much,

0:20:25.320 --> 0:20:27.880
<v Speaker 1>and people do this strategically all the time. And like,

0:20:28.119 --> 0:20:31.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, even though the emotion of karma mudas described

0:20:31.080 --> 0:20:34.760
<v Speaker 1>as inherently pleasurable, even though it feels good, it represents

0:20:34.760 --> 0:20:37.879
<v Speaker 1>a loss of control. It can be frightening, embarrassing, It

0:20:37.920 --> 0:20:41.600
<v Speaker 1>can make you feel vulnerable. Yeah, I mean I can,

0:20:41.400 --> 0:20:43.720
<v Speaker 1>I can. I think I can relate to that sum

0:20:43.720 --> 0:20:48.000
<v Speaker 1>with movies because I certainly at times appreciate being moved

0:20:48.040 --> 0:20:51.560
<v Speaker 1>by a film, you know, uh, you know, the emotional

0:20:51.680 --> 0:20:54.159
<v Speaker 1>roller coaster of a of a good film, and if

0:20:54.160 --> 0:20:58.080
<v Speaker 1>it's done right, you don't feel manipulated. You know, you

0:20:58.160 --> 0:21:01.159
<v Speaker 1>feel as if you were you're actually actually engaging with

0:21:01.200 --> 0:21:04.000
<v Speaker 1>the picture. But then there are other times where you

0:21:04.119 --> 0:21:07.080
<v Speaker 1>just don't want to feel that, you know, and you

0:21:07.119 --> 0:21:09.760
<v Speaker 1>certainly don't want to feel like the filmmakers are trying

0:21:09.760 --> 0:21:13.560
<v Speaker 1>to manipulate you into having a particular emotional state. And

0:21:13.600 --> 0:21:16.359
<v Speaker 1>maybe that's one of the reasons I'm drawn to to

0:21:16.680 --> 0:21:21.040
<v Speaker 1>to bad films, is that that oftentimes you you can

0:21:21.080 --> 0:21:23.439
<v Speaker 1>be sure that you're probably not going to have a

0:21:23.520 --> 0:21:27.240
<v Speaker 1>strong emotional reaction unless it, I don't know, unless it's

0:21:27.280 --> 0:21:30.720
<v Speaker 1>to something that is, you know, done poorly and poor

0:21:30.880 --> 0:21:34.000
<v Speaker 1>done poorly in just the right way to evoke those

0:21:34.040 --> 0:21:36.879
<v Speaker 1>kind of emotions. And this is basically how I feel

0:21:36.960 --> 0:21:40.200
<v Speaker 1>when anyone makes like a current horror movie recommendation for

0:21:40.280 --> 0:21:41.960
<v Speaker 1>him and they're like, oh, you should see such and such.

0:21:42.480 --> 0:21:45.320
<v Speaker 1>Make you feel so bad, it's gonna be so shocking,

0:21:45.320 --> 0:21:47.560
<v Speaker 1>it's just really gonna tear you apart. And I don't know,

0:21:47.640 --> 0:21:50.280
<v Speaker 1>I think I'd rather just watch something with a rubber

0:21:50.480 --> 0:21:52.960
<v Speaker 1>monster costume. And you were just talking about your love

0:21:53.000 --> 0:21:57.000
<v Speaker 1>for the fly that's the king of genuine bad feelings. Yeah. Yeah,

0:21:57.119 --> 0:21:58.600
<v Speaker 1>But I think the part of that is that I

0:21:58.640 --> 0:22:00.600
<v Speaker 1>saw it. I saw it at a at a point

0:22:00.600 --> 0:22:02.160
<v Speaker 1>in my life when I was more open to those

0:22:02.200 --> 0:22:04.720
<v Speaker 1>experiences where I was like, yes, let me watch some

0:22:04.840 --> 0:22:08.200
<v Speaker 1>challenging horror. I'm ready to be challenged and and uh

0:22:08.280 --> 0:22:10.400
<v Speaker 1>and so now you know it already has a warm

0:22:10.440 --> 0:22:12.840
<v Speaker 1>place in my heart. It's not going to shock me

0:22:12.920 --> 0:22:15.680
<v Speaker 1>with anything new. I mean, I maybe you know, when

0:22:15.680 --> 0:22:18.040
<v Speaker 1>you revisit a film, you always feel something. If it's

0:22:18.080 --> 0:22:20.320
<v Speaker 1>a good film, anyway, you feel something different, you find

0:22:20.320 --> 0:22:23.359
<v Speaker 1>new corners to it. But for the most part, I

0:22:23.359 --> 0:22:26.200
<v Speaker 1>know what I'm going to get um and and maybe

0:22:26.200 --> 0:22:29.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm yeah, I'm as I get older, I'm less inclined

0:22:29.720 --> 0:22:32.800
<v Speaker 1>to have that kind of vulnerable experience, especially with the

0:22:32.840 --> 0:22:36.159
<v Speaker 1>horror film, you know, because I don't know, it's like

0:22:36.359 --> 0:22:39.440
<v Speaker 1>the the horror film does not have my my best

0:22:39.480 --> 0:22:44.560
<v Speaker 1>interests at heart, necessarily just trying to hurt you. Yeah,

0:22:44.800 --> 0:22:48.359
<v Speaker 1>that's I think some films. I think a lot of

0:22:48.400 --> 0:22:51.560
<v Speaker 1>films like and granted this is a this is also

0:22:51.600 --> 0:22:54.439
<v Speaker 1>a risk with bad horror, you know, because it's sometimes

0:22:54.480 --> 0:22:58.119
<v Speaker 1>it's even worse right because they're struggling with the with

0:22:58.200 --> 0:23:01.800
<v Speaker 1>titanic feelings of like fee you're in hatred and and

0:23:01.920 --> 0:23:04.600
<v Speaker 1>uh and then so forth, like all these negative aspects

0:23:04.640 --> 0:23:09.680
<v Speaker 1>of of existence. And then sometimes the people managing all

0:23:09.720 --> 0:23:12.399
<v Speaker 1>of these feelings, you know, they don't have the the

0:23:12.640 --> 0:23:17.520
<v Speaker 1>storytelling or filmmaking. Um, expertise to really do it well.

0:23:17.680 --> 0:23:22.080
<v Speaker 1>So it's like going to a pharmacy and having somebody like, uh,

0:23:22.119 --> 0:23:25.960
<v Speaker 1>you know what, it could compile your spilling pills all

0:23:25.960 --> 0:23:28.000
<v Speaker 1>over you and it kills all over the place, and

0:23:28.040 --> 0:23:29.800
<v Speaker 1>then feeling like, oh, well, this is probably going to

0:23:29.840 --> 0:23:32.000
<v Speaker 1>poison me because they have no idea what they're doing.

0:23:32.040 --> 0:23:34.600
<v Speaker 1>They don't know how to dish out the appropriate dosage.

0:23:35.000 --> 0:23:38.240
<v Speaker 1>And you want you want the appropriate dosage of horror. Uh.

0:23:38.280 --> 0:23:42.640
<v Speaker 1>And sometimes it's easier to air on underdosing yourself. Okay,

0:23:42.840 --> 0:23:45.240
<v Speaker 1>dogs don't have faces, and the movies are trying to

0:23:45.280 --> 0:23:48.639
<v Speaker 1>harm you. Well sometimes no, I mean I think you

0:23:48.680 --> 0:23:52.080
<v Speaker 1>could be right, You could be onto something there. But

0:23:52.240 --> 0:23:54.720
<v Speaker 1>you know what, Robert, I think this next this next

0:23:54.760 --> 0:23:57.040
<v Speaker 1>email is gonna put you in a vulnerable place and

0:23:57.040 --> 0:24:00.960
<v Speaker 1>make you feel something. All right, here we go. This

0:24:00.960 --> 0:24:03.359
<v Speaker 1>one comes to us from George. I was listening to

0:24:03.400 --> 0:24:06.640
<v Speaker 1>the Warm Feelings episode and was moderately skeptical of the sensation,

0:24:06.880 --> 0:24:09.199
<v Speaker 1>which made me feel odd since I was hearing so

0:24:09.280 --> 0:24:12.040
<v Speaker 1>much evidence. The feeling was short lived due to the

0:24:12.080 --> 0:24:16.240
<v Speaker 1>explanation of the mooda scale. I perked up, knowing full

0:24:16.280 --> 0:24:19.280
<v Speaker 1>well the story. After the explanation. The mention of being

0:24:19.280 --> 0:24:21.879
<v Speaker 1>a wrestling fan did cause me to experience the feeling

0:24:21.960 --> 0:24:25.159
<v Speaker 1>in my chest and I felt an involuntary smile in

0:24:25.200 --> 0:24:28.320
<v Speaker 1>the sense of Cammoderie. Living in Orlando, I get the

0:24:28.400 --> 0:24:31.560
<v Speaker 1>chance to attend in XT television with around three hundred people,

0:24:31.760 --> 0:24:35.040
<v Speaker 1>and there is a special communal energy. As an aside,

0:24:35.080 --> 0:24:38.040
<v Speaker 1>I am thrilled to be seeing Great Mooda live this

0:24:38.160 --> 0:24:41.919
<v Speaker 1>April in Tampa. Thank you for the varied subjects and

0:24:41.960 --> 0:24:44.040
<v Speaker 1>depth of research and attention. Do you make my work

0:24:44.160 --> 0:24:48.520
<v Speaker 1>day that much better? George V Uh, Well, yeah, that's

0:24:48.560 --> 0:24:51.320
<v Speaker 1>that's awesome to hear. I I I think this is

0:24:51.359 --> 0:24:55.080
<v Speaker 1>a common experience with you know, with seeing uh say,

0:24:55.200 --> 0:24:57.880
<v Speaker 1>professional wrestling or any kind of like performance like this,

0:24:58.280 --> 0:25:00.800
<v Speaker 1>especially when you have a smaller the inside kind of

0:25:00.840 --> 0:25:04.840
<v Speaker 1>like tighten it, tighten nit group, Uh, you know, certainly

0:25:04.840 --> 0:25:08.359
<v Speaker 1>with three people and attendance at an inn x T taping. Uh.

0:25:08.440 --> 0:25:10.360
<v Speaker 1>You know, it makes sense that you would have this, uh,

0:25:10.440 --> 0:25:13.119
<v Speaker 1>this kind of reaction to it. You know, I naively

0:25:13.200 --> 0:25:16.760
<v Speaker 1>would have expected that wrestling falls more in the bad

0:25:16.800 --> 0:25:19.280
<v Speaker 1>movie category, where it's something that you can expect to

0:25:19.359 --> 0:25:21.880
<v Speaker 1>only engage you in a shallow way that it's kind

0:25:21.880 --> 0:25:24.359
<v Speaker 1>of funny and fun and you you wouldn't expect to

0:25:24.359 --> 0:25:28.560
<v Speaker 1>be deeply emotionally moved by it. I'm surprised how much

0:25:28.680 --> 0:25:32.280
<v Speaker 1>emotional investment people do seem to have in it. Well,

0:25:32.400 --> 0:25:36.200
<v Speaker 1>it's you can get very invested in an emotional experience

0:25:36.200 --> 0:25:39.520
<v Speaker 1>even if you know basically what's going to happen. Uh.

0:25:39.640 --> 0:25:43.560
<v Speaker 1>One example wrestling based that comes to mind to explain

0:25:43.680 --> 0:25:47.120
<v Speaker 1>this is I've seen people talk about Luca Libre in Mexico,

0:25:47.560 --> 0:25:50.640
<v Speaker 1>and I forget who was having this conversation, but one

0:25:50.680 --> 0:25:54.040
<v Speaker 1>side was like, well, I would get more into it,

0:25:54.080 --> 0:25:56.439
<v Speaker 1>but it's so predictable, like you know whether the good

0:25:56.480 --> 0:25:59.000
<v Speaker 1>guy or the bad guy is gonna win, and uh,

0:25:59.040 --> 0:26:01.240
<v Speaker 1>and then the other and compared it more to like

0:26:01.280 --> 0:26:04.560
<v Speaker 1>a passion play, you know, where the good guys win

0:26:04.720 --> 0:26:06.480
<v Speaker 1>for the same reasons that the good guys win in

0:26:06.640 --> 0:26:09.879
<v Speaker 1>myths and folk tales and so forth, And so you

0:26:09.920 --> 0:26:12.440
<v Speaker 1>have to think of it less as a like cinematic

0:26:13.160 --> 0:26:16.760
<v Speaker 1>presentation of a story and more of these you know,

0:26:16.840 --> 0:26:20.800
<v Speaker 1>these these tropes, these ideals coming together and battling each other,

0:26:21.160 --> 0:26:23.919
<v Speaker 1>and then the audience shares in the communal experience of this.

0:26:24.040 --> 0:26:27.119
<v Speaker 1>So it's I mean, it's it's the same with puppet

0:26:27.160 --> 0:26:31.000
<v Speaker 1>shows and shadow puppetry and various performances throughout history. In

0:26:31.000 --> 0:26:33.840
<v Speaker 1>that regard, don't be the guy hating on wrestling because

0:26:33.840 --> 0:26:37.840
<v Speaker 1>it's not realistic. Come on, well, like an example, a

0:26:37.840 --> 0:26:39.960
<v Speaker 1>fun example. Over the weekend I was in Uh, I

0:26:40.000 --> 0:26:43.920
<v Speaker 1>was at Universal Studios, Florida in the Harry Potter Land

0:26:43.960 --> 0:26:46.320
<v Speaker 1>with my family. My son's a big Harry Potter fan.

0:26:46.400 --> 0:26:49.600
<v Speaker 1>We're all Harry Potter fans. And they had like this

0:26:49.720 --> 0:26:53.720
<v Speaker 1>live performance puppet show of the story of the Three

0:26:53.760 --> 0:26:58.119
<v Speaker 1>brothers as is told in The Deathly Hallows. Uh. And

0:26:58.240 --> 0:26:59.960
<v Speaker 1>it's you know, it's a it's a fun little story

0:27:00.200 --> 0:27:03.600
<v Speaker 1>like three adventurers and death and the gifts of death,

0:27:04.000 --> 0:27:07.400
<v Speaker 1>the older one, the you know, this is the magical Stone,

0:27:07.640 --> 0:27:10.960
<v Speaker 1>the invisibility cloak. And they so they're performing the story

0:27:11.000 --> 0:27:14.080
<v Speaker 1>for everybody. Everybody knows the story because they've they've either

0:27:14.119 --> 0:27:16.800
<v Speaker 1>read it, you know, or if they've seen the film. Uh.

0:27:16.880 --> 0:27:19.000
<v Speaker 1>And perhaps they've seen it earlier in the day because

0:27:19.000 --> 0:27:22.879
<v Speaker 1>they perform it like every half hour, so right, but

0:27:23.080 --> 0:27:25.280
<v Speaker 1>everybody gets into it, like part of it is knowing

0:27:25.400 --> 0:27:27.960
<v Speaker 1>the show you're about to see and uh. And there

0:27:28.040 --> 0:27:29.840
<v Speaker 1>was this kind of communal vibe to it. It was

0:27:29.880 --> 0:27:32.720
<v Speaker 1>pretty exciting, even though it is, you know, a performance

0:27:33.240 --> 0:27:35.600
<v Speaker 1>at a theme park. All right, Well, on that note,

0:27:35.640 --> 0:27:37.119
<v Speaker 1>we're going to take a quick break, but when we

0:27:37.160 --> 0:27:41.320
<v Speaker 1>come back, we will explore some additional entries of listener mail.

0:27:42.600 --> 0:27:47.399
<v Speaker 1>Thank alright, we're back. We're moving on from Kama Muda

0:27:47.520 --> 0:27:51.320
<v Speaker 1>and getting into some divine territory. Right, so we're gonna

0:27:51.320 --> 0:27:54.800
<v Speaker 1>be talking about messages that came in after our is

0:27:54.840 --> 0:27:58.560
<v Speaker 1>Santa God episodes. Those were definitely a lot of fun. Again,

0:27:58.680 --> 0:28:01.919
<v Speaker 1>we know some people occasionally listen with their kids, so

0:28:02.000 --> 0:28:05.000
<v Speaker 1>the next few minutes will involve some frank discussion of

0:28:05.080 --> 0:28:09.000
<v Speaker 1>the jolliest of old elves. Just be warned there, that's right,

0:28:09.040 --> 0:28:13.840
<v Speaker 1>Skip ahead if you need to, all right, Taylor writes, Hi,

0:28:14.000 --> 0:28:17.200
<v Speaker 1>Robert and Joe Taylor again, writing from Salt Lake City,

0:28:17.240 --> 0:28:20.440
<v Speaker 1>to share my childhood experience of Santa in a Christian household.

0:28:20.760 --> 0:28:25.479
<v Speaker 1>I grew up LDS or Mormon more colloquially, and Santa

0:28:25.560 --> 0:28:28.960
<v Speaker 1>did experience a mild induction into my childhood faith. I've

0:28:28.960 --> 0:28:31.800
<v Speaker 1>always been intensely curious, and even as a child, was

0:28:31.880 --> 0:28:35.960
<v Speaker 1>very concerned about establishing a consistent ideology for the universe.

0:28:36.400 --> 0:28:39.080
<v Speaker 1>So when I was four or five years old, I

0:28:39.120 --> 0:28:41.640
<v Speaker 1>wondered why Santa would need to keep watch when God

0:28:41.680 --> 0:28:44.520
<v Speaker 1>already knew everything that was going on. For context, my

0:28:44.560 --> 0:28:47.160
<v Speaker 1>family and I have have long since left the faith,

0:28:47.320 --> 0:28:50.120
<v Speaker 1>and my parents were never very fundamental about their beliefs.

0:28:50.560 --> 0:28:52.959
<v Speaker 1>When I presented my Santa dilimit to my parents, they

0:28:53.000 --> 0:28:56.120
<v Speaker 1>cunningly replied that God must have invested Santa with this

0:28:56.200 --> 0:28:59.760
<v Speaker 1>holiday responsibility, and I was delighted that God would be

0:28:59.800 --> 0:29:03.719
<v Speaker 1>concerned with which transformers I received that year. My parents

0:29:03.760 --> 0:29:06.920
<v Speaker 1>never made any connection to the historical St. Nicholas, perhaps

0:29:06.920 --> 0:29:11.160
<v Speaker 1>because Mormonism is an American religion far removed from Catholicism,

0:29:11.640 --> 0:29:14.400
<v Speaker 1>perhaps because they weren't very interested in history back then,

0:29:14.720 --> 0:29:18.240
<v Speaker 1>and most likely because, as you say, they were Santa.

0:29:18.840 --> 0:29:22.320
<v Speaker 1>The belief was cemented when I stumbled across an esoteric

0:29:22.520 --> 0:29:27.960
<v Speaker 1>verse in King James version of the Bible Zachariah to six. Quote, Ho, Ho,

0:29:28.360 --> 0:29:30.960
<v Speaker 1>come forth and flee from the land of the north,

0:29:31.280 --> 0:29:34.600
<v Speaker 1>Saith the Lord, for I have spread you abroad as

0:29:34.640 --> 0:29:37.720
<v Speaker 1>the four winds of the heaven, Saith the Lord whoa

0:29:37.880 --> 0:29:41.240
<v Speaker 1>unquote between the Ho Ho the land of the north

0:29:41.440 --> 0:29:45.800
<v Speaker 1>and spread abroad as the Four winds. I was convinced

0:29:46.000 --> 0:29:50.080
<v Speaker 1>of Santa's divine investiture, never mind the context or the

0:29:50.120 --> 0:29:54.760
<v Speaker 1>rest of the surrounding versus. These revelations and a repeat

0:29:54.880 --> 0:29:58.560
<v Speaker 1>encounter with a Mall Santa sustained my fundamental belief in

0:29:58.600 --> 0:30:01.200
<v Speaker 1>the jolly old Elf for sever for more years, despite

0:30:01.280 --> 0:30:05.000
<v Speaker 1>my investigative nature. As for the Mall Santa, I ran

0:30:05.040 --> 0:30:07.400
<v Speaker 1>into him twice in a week, first at a grocery

0:30:07.440 --> 0:30:10.320
<v Speaker 1>store and then at a party organized by our congregation.

0:30:10.600 --> 0:30:12.760
<v Speaker 1>When I sat on Santa's lap at the church party,

0:30:12.920 --> 0:30:15.960
<v Speaker 1>he handily remembered what I'd asked him for days prior

0:30:15.960 --> 0:30:18.040
<v Speaker 1>to the grocery store, and that blew my little mind.

0:30:18.400 --> 0:30:21.120
<v Speaker 1>The possibility that this was a man with a particularly

0:30:21.160 --> 0:30:23.920
<v Speaker 1>gifted memory and not the literal Chris Kringle did not

0:30:24.000 --> 0:30:26.920
<v Speaker 1>cross my mind. For some years. I didn't believe that

0:30:26.960 --> 0:30:29.880
<v Speaker 1>every Mall Santa was the genuine article, but I thought

0:30:30.080 --> 0:30:33.160
<v Speaker 1>the fat Man must spice it up with some special appearances.

0:30:34.400 --> 0:30:36.520
<v Speaker 1>Happy holidays to you both, and thank you as always

0:30:36.520 --> 0:30:38.960
<v Speaker 1>for creating such genuinely engaging content. I haven't missed an

0:30:39.000 --> 0:30:42.360
<v Speaker 1>episode in years. Taylor, PS, I'm thrilled you enjoyed my

0:30:42.440 --> 0:30:45.840
<v Speaker 1>Pokemon email enough to share it that one must have

0:30:45.840 --> 0:30:48.480
<v Speaker 1>been a while back. Uh, this was great, And this

0:30:48.640 --> 0:30:50.960
<v Speaker 1>really connected with a lot of memories I have about

0:30:51.760 --> 0:30:54.160
<v Speaker 1>Santa beliefs as a kid, like trying to trying to

0:30:54.200 --> 0:30:58.280
<v Speaker 1>incorporate Santa into a Christian worldview and saying, Okay, God

0:30:58.320 --> 0:31:03.240
<v Speaker 1>already knows everything, but Santa all also knows everything. Santa

0:31:03.320 --> 0:31:06.320
<v Speaker 1>must sort of work for God. He's like maybe at

0:31:06.320 --> 0:31:09.280
<v Speaker 1>the level of the angels or something. I don't know,

0:31:09.320 --> 0:31:12.280
<v Speaker 1>it's weird, I you know, just despite growing up in

0:31:12.480 --> 0:31:16.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, in a religious household and uh and certainly

0:31:16.720 --> 0:31:19.920
<v Speaker 1>hearing talk about God and church and so forth, I

0:31:19.960 --> 0:31:23.680
<v Speaker 1>don't think I have a really compared God with Santa.

0:31:23.880 --> 0:31:26.280
<v Speaker 1>You know, I didn't really. I don't know. I'm not

0:31:26.320 --> 0:31:28.080
<v Speaker 1>sure what it was, but I never really thought too

0:31:28.120 --> 0:31:30.360
<v Speaker 1>long and hard about what their relationship with each other were.

0:31:30.840 --> 0:31:33.040
<v Speaker 1>In a way, I kind of maybe it was kind

0:31:33.080 --> 0:31:35.760
<v Speaker 1>of it was kind of like engaging with with separate worldviews.

0:31:35.800 --> 0:31:37.880
<v Speaker 1>Like when I was thinking about Santa, I was thinking

0:31:37.920 --> 0:31:42.120
<v Speaker 1>about like the Santa um uh, you know, version of

0:31:42.120 --> 0:31:45.560
<v Speaker 1>of reality. And then when I'm engaging with with with churches,

0:31:45.600 --> 0:31:49.960
<v Speaker 1>the church version of reality, and um, yeah, that's that's

0:31:50.000 --> 0:31:53.000
<v Speaker 1>the best I can figure on that on that count. Yeah,

0:31:53.000 --> 0:31:54.720
<v Speaker 1>I guess I was always trying to make sense of

0:31:54.720 --> 0:31:58.000
<v Speaker 1>it crammed together like Taylor, like putting it all in. Okay,

0:31:58.000 --> 0:32:02.280
<v Speaker 1>how does this fit? Um? I also remember this similar

0:32:02.280 --> 0:32:04.840
<v Speaker 1>feeling of like, Okay, I know not all of the

0:32:04.880 --> 0:32:07.120
<v Speaker 1>Santa's you see at the mall and everywhere can be

0:32:07.160 --> 0:32:09.600
<v Speaker 1>the real Santa, but I wonder if some of them

0:32:09.640 --> 0:32:13.840
<v Speaker 1>are like this, like Taylor saying, like occasionally the real

0:32:13.880 --> 0:32:16.240
<v Speaker 1>Santa shows up at the mall, but most of the

0:32:16.280 --> 0:32:20.720
<v Speaker 1>mall Santa's are fake. Yeah. Yeah. Becomes just such an

0:32:20.760 --> 0:32:25.120
<v Speaker 1>increasingly complex exercise when you're trying stitch that together. And

0:32:25.160 --> 0:32:28.200
<v Speaker 1>I guess that's part of the situation, right. Eventually you

0:32:28.320 --> 0:32:30.400
<v Speaker 1>just use there are just too many flaws, there are

0:32:30.400 --> 0:32:33.040
<v Speaker 1>too many plot holes and uh and certainly if you

0:32:33.080 --> 0:32:38.560
<v Speaker 1>pull out comes Razor out, then that's the end of it. Now.

0:32:38.600 --> 0:32:42.200
<v Speaker 1>This next email comes from our listener Arson, and it

0:32:42.280 --> 0:32:44.760
<v Speaker 1>concerns the question we asked in the Santa God episode,

0:32:44.800 --> 0:32:47.880
<v Speaker 1>like what would it take for a real Santa religion

0:32:47.920 --> 0:32:51.800
<v Speaker 1>to form, like an actual religion with Santa as a god?

0:32:52.080 --> 0:32:54.760
<v Speaker 1>You know, meant seriously in the way people's other gods

0:32:54.760 --> 0:32:58.240
<v Speaker 1>are meant seriously. Arson says, Hello, Robert and Joe. I

0:32:58.280 --> 0:33:00.680
<v Speaker 1>think I have a simple solution for how Santa Claus

0:33:00.680 --> 0:33:04.080
<v Speaker 1>could continue to inspire belief in adults. The first is

0:33:04.120 --> 0:33:07.800
<v Speaker 1>to change physical gifts wrapped with a label staying there

0:33:07.800 --> 0:33:11.880
<v Speaker 1>from Santa two gifts with less concrete origins. It's pretty

0:33:11.880 --> 0:33:14.480
<v Speaker 1>common in religions focused on a deity for people to

0:33:14.520 --> 0:33:18.560
<v Speaker 1>attribute fortunate things to various gods. This is also a

0:33:18.560 --> 0:33:21.440
<v Speaker 1>common way to scam people out of money, most notably

0:33:21.480 --> 0:33:24.440
<v Speaker 1>groups or individuals that request the person being scammed to

0:33:24.520 --> 0:33:27.560
<v Speaker 1>send increasing amounts of money with the promise that there

0:33:27.560 --> 0:33:30.800
<v Speaker 1>will be an exponential return on that investment. Even though

0:33:30.800 --> 0:33:33.640
<v Speaker 1>there is no real result, the person being scammed can

0:33:33.720 --> 0:33:36.840
<v Speaker 1>attribute their luck to the scam and thus their belief

0:33:36.880 --> 0:33:39.800
<v Speaker 1>in the ideas behind it can be strengthened. It would

0:33:39.840 --> 0:33:42.200
<v Speaker 1>not take much of a stretch to tell children who

0:33:42.200 --> 0:33:45.239
<v Speaker 1>reach a certain age that adults do the work of

0:33:45.320 --> 0:33:48.080
<v Speaker 1>distributing gifts that Santa provides for in the form of

0:33:48.120 --> 0:33:52.160
<v Speaker 1>mysterious windfalls. This would have a basis in St. Nicholas history,

0:33:52.200 --> 0:33:54.320
<v Speaker 1>since he was said to give money to keep people

0:33:54.320 --> 0:33:57.480
<v Speaker 1>out of poverty and sin. The tradition some people have

0:33:57.600 --> 0:34:00.760
<v Speaker 1>of choosing one person to play Santa and hand out

0:34:00.760 --> 0:34:03.640
<v Speaker 1>gifts could work as a stepping stone for older children

0:34:03.920 --> 0:34:07.240
<v Speaker 1>who would be preparing to be agents of Santa themselves.

0:34:07.280 --> 0:34:09.400
<v Speaker 1>This would eliminate the need for Santa to have a

0:34:09.440 --> 0:34:13.359
<v Speaker 1>physical location and to workshop and helpers. He would only

0:34:13.440 --> 0:34:17.279
<v Speaker 1>need to mysteriously provide resources. This could also change the

0:34:17.320 --> 0:34:21.239
<v Speaker 1>equation about who receives presents. Naughty children might lead to

0:34:21.280 --> 0:34:25.200
<v Speaker 1>a family receiving less bounty during the holidays, so unfortunate

0:34:25.239 --> 0:34:29.800
<v Speaker 1>circumstances might be placed on children not being good enough. Hopefully,

0:34:29.800 --> 0:34:33.120
<v Speaker 1>though the blame would fall equally on everyone. In that case,

0:34:33.239 --> 0:34:35.920
<v Speaker 1>everyone in the house would have incentive to keep everyone

0:34:35.960 --> 0:34:39.000
<v Speaker 1>else in line. If the Elf on a shelf remained popular,

0:34:39.200 --> 0:34:41.480
<v Speaker 1>it could take a darker turn and mutate into one

0:34:41.480 --> 0:34:45.000
<v Speaker 1>of Santa's evil helpers. Another thing he is known for

0:34:45.120 --> 0:34:47.799
<v Speaker 1>is being a protector of children, which seems to be

0:34:47.840 --> 0:34:52.000
<v Speaker 1>one reason he survived various cultural and religious shifts. I

0:34:52.080 --> 0:34:55.720
<v Speaker 1>highly recommend listening to the episode of Our Fake History

0:34:56.000 --> 0:34:59.320
<v Speaker 1>where the host goes into detail about all of his variations.

0:34:59.640 --> 0:35:02.160
<v Speaker 1>In one instance, a child who had been abducted was

0:35:02.239 --> 0:35:05.680
<v Speaker 1>rescued by a flying St. Nicholas, who swooped in, grabbed

0:35:05.719 --> 0:35:08.280
<v Speaker 1>him by the hair, and deposited him with his family.

0:35:08.680 --> 0:35:12.560
<v Speaker 1>But St. Nicholas was also known as zealously disciplined bad children,

0:35:12.600 --> 0:35:15.920
<v Speaker 1>including beating them. His various helpers have been known to

0:35:16.120 --> 0:35:19.440
<v Speaker 1>enslave bad children or worse. I think it would be

0:35:19.480 --> 0:35:23.000
<v Speaker 1>easy for an adult, especially apparent, to buy more into

0:35:23.000 --> 0:35:26.080
<v Speaker 1>this myth because of how fragile children are. They might

0:35:26.120 --> 0:35:28.640
<v Speaker 1>not fear a child being physically carried off. But what

0:35:28.719 --> 0:35:32.239
<v Speaker 1>if these helpers had equally mysterious gifts to give? Was

0:35:32.320 --> 0:35:35.719
<v Speaker 1>that flu a fluke? Or was the child naughty? Does

0:35:35.760 --> 0:35:38.120
<v Speaker 1>my child have good enough grades or a clean enough

0:35:38.200 --> 0:35:40.680
<v Speaker 1>room to be on the good list? I can imagine

0:35:40.719 --> 0:35:43.520
<v Speaker 1>parents agonizing over this, especially if we end up in

0:35:43.520 --> 0:35:47.400
<v Speaker 1>a world where antibiotics stop working in superbugs reign supreme.

0:35:48.000 --> 0:35:49.840
<v Speaker 1>On that note, I hope you both have a wonderful

0:35:49.840 --> 0:35:55.160
<v Speaker 1>holiday season and a happy new year. Arson. Well, I'm

0:35:55.160 --> 0:35:57.120
<v Speaker 1>having a happy New Year and and and a good

0:35:57.120 --> 0:36:00.160
<v Speaker 1>holiday season, Thank you, Arson. I agree with the out

0:36:00.200 --> 0:36:02.520
<v Speaker 1>of this as as I think we sort of expressed

0:36:02.520 --> 0:36:05.560
<v Speaker 1>in the episodes. If Santa would have any chance of

0:36:05.640 --> 0:36:09.000
<v Speaker 1>actually becoming a god through cultural shifts over time. I

0:36:09.040 --> 0:36:11.560
<v Speaker 1>think one of the most important changes would have to be,

0:36:11.640 --> 0:36:16.239
<v Speaker 1>like Arson's talking about a trend toward abstraction and obscurity,

0:36:16.480 --> 0:36:21.600
<v Speaker 1>intangible gifts at unpredictable times rather than concrete toys on

0:36:21.680 --> 0:36:25.440
<v Speaker 1>Christmas Morning. But then it wouldn't be Santa. Is the thing? Like,

0:36:25.600 --> 0:36:27.640
<v Speaker 1>the part of the thing about Santa is that Santa

0:36:27.719 --> 0:36:30.880
<v Speaker 1>appeals to young minds who don't have a lot of

0:36:30.920 --> 0:36:34.800
<v Speaker 1>space for these intangibles. You know, they want the very tangible.

0:36:34.840 --> 0:36:37.359
<v Speaker 1>They want the gift that is visible under the tree,

0:36:37.400 --> 0:36:39.120
<v Speaker 1>that you can pick up, that you can hold, that

0:36:39.200 --> 0:36:42.840
<v Speaker 1>you can play with, the actual Santa whose lap you

0:36:42.880 --> 0:36:45.120
<v Speaker 1>can say you can sit on. And I feel like

0:36:45.239 --> 0:36:47.160
<v Speaker 1>the more abstract you make it, the more you make

0:36:47.160 --> 0:36:49.800
<v Speaker 1>it for adults, the less it will it will actually

0:36:49.840 --> 0:36:53.560
<v Speaker 1>resonate with the child, and then paradoxically, the less it

0:36:53.560 --> 0:36:56.840
<v Speaker 1>will then resonate with the backward looking adults. Well, but

0:36:56.920 --> 0:36:59.960
<v Speaker 1>I think that's exactly why Arson's proposing this like progression

0:37:00.000 --> 0:37:03.560
<v Speaker 1>and right, where so adults play Santa and giving concrete

0:37:03.560 --> 0:37:06.880
<v Speaker 1>gifts to children that the children understand is coming from Santa.

0:37:07.120 --> 0:37:09.359
<v Speaker 1>And then there's a rite of passage. Whereas you grow

0:37:09.440 --> 0:37:12.239
<v Speaker 1>up you realize, oh, okay, the concrete gifts that the

0:37:12.320 --> 0:37:15.640
<v Speaker 1>children got, those were the you know, those were uh

0:37:15.880 --> 0:37:18.680
<v Speaker 1>from adults pretending to be Santa, sort of the priests

0:37:18.719 --> 0:37:23.080
<v Speaker 1>of Santa. The real Santa gives intangible benefits like health

0:37:23.120 --> 0:37:27.759
<v Speaker 1>and wealth and stuff to people, to adults who are good. Okay, Um, well,

0:37:27.800 --> 0:37:30.279
<v Speaker 1>I'll also say December is crazy and nobody has time

0:37:30.320 --> 0:37:34.040
<v Speaker 1>for this. This is this is too elaborate a con Uh,

0:37:34.400 --> 0:37:37.319
<v Speaker 1>it's enough to just do like the normal Santa thing. Oh,

0:37:37.360 --> 0:37:39.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I mean people find room to do

0:37:39.200 --> 0:37:41.880
<v Speaker 1>the regular Santa thing in December and then do prosperity

0:37:41.920 --> 0:37:43.800
<v Speaker 1>gospel the rest of the year. I mean, yeah, I

0:37:43.840 --> 0:37:46.080
<v Speaker 1>guess so. And I know, I mean Arson makes some

0:37:46.160 --> 0:37:50.040
<v Speaker 1>good points. Maybe I'm just I'm just against the idea

0:37:50.160 --> 0:37:53.520
<v Speaker 1>of destroying the idea of Santa. So like, you know,

0:37:53.680 --> 0:37:55.719
<v Speaker 1>there's something pure about it. Let it, let it live

0:37:55.719 --> 0:37:58.719
<v Speaker 1>for the short time it can thrive. Well, I'll defend Arson.

0:37:58.800 --> 0:38:00.799
<v Speaker 1>I don't think Arson is suggesting this would be a

0:38:00.840 --> 0:38:06.000
<v Speaker 1>good thing to do. All right, here's another one. This

0:38:06.040 --> 0:38:09.040
<v Speaker 1>one comes to us from Mark. Hey, guys, absolutely love

0:38:09.080 --> 0:38:11.000
<v Speaker 1>your podcast. I'm a couple of weeks behind, and I

0:38:11.080 --> 0:38:13.600
<v Speaker 1>just finished your two episodes on whether Santa qualifies as

0:38:13.600 --> 0:38:16.040
<v Speaker 1>a god or not. A couple of things struck out

0:38:16.400 --> 0:38:19.719
<v Speaker 1>to me, namely the processed food gods. You touched on

0:38:19.719 --> 0:38:22.920
<v Speaker 1>the ridiculousness of the crunch wrap Supreme God as well

0:38:22.960 --> 0:38:25.719
<v Speaker 1>as the flying spaghetti Monster. It occurred to me that

0:38:25.760 --> 0:38:28.960
<v Speaker 1>both of those examples involved processed foods. I eat foods

0:38:29.080 --> 0:38:32.000
<v Speaker 1>that aren't found in nature. I know certain cultures have

0:38:32.120 --> 0:38:35.279
<v Speaker 1>gods that reside over certain foods, like rice gods and

0:38:35.320 --> 0:38:39.200
<v Speaker 1>Asian cultures. I was wondering if in your hours upon

0:38:39.560 --> 0:38:42.200
<v Speaker 1>days upon weeks of research you would come across other

0:38:42.280 --> 0:38:45.520
<v Speaker 1>gods constructed by humans. There are plenty of examples of

0:38:45.600 --> 0:38:49.800
<v Speaker 1>humans made items becoming animate or being possessed by spirits

0:38:49.800 --> 0:38:53.400
<v Speaker 1>in many cultures, but I don't recall ever hearing examples

0:38:53.440 --> 0:38:58.480
<v Speaker 1>of god's being handmade. Best regards, Mark, Yeah, the best

0:38:58.520 --> 0:39:00.919
<v Speaker 1>example I could think of the this fits more into

0:39:00.960 --> 0:39:03.320
<v Speaker 1>the first half of what you're talking about is the Sukamogami,

0:39:03.480 --> 0:39:07.560
<v Speaker 1>the tool gods from the Japanese legends that we talked about.

0:39:07.560 --> 0:39:09.719
<v Speaker 1>So these like tools that were cast out in the

0:39:09.719 --> 0:39:13.520
<v Speaker 1>New Year, um they would become animate but I don't

0:39:13.520 --> 0:39:17.040
<v Speaker 1>think they became You're mark you're sort of making a

0:39:17.040 --> 0:39:21.040
<v Speaker 1>distinction between gods that are, like, you know, powerful creator

0:39:21.080 --> 0:39:25.440
<v Speaker 1>type figures versus just kind of things that are inhabited

0:39:25.480 --> 0:39:28.960
<v Speaker 1>by minor spirits. And I think the Sukamogami were more

0:39:28.960 --> 0:39:32.200
<v Speaker 1>minor spirits. Yeah, like he's talking about, could you have

0:39:32.239 --> 0:39:36.400
<v Speaker 1>a situation where a major deity is a rock or

0:39:36.560 --> 0:39:39.200
<v Speaker 1>something to that effect or it well is is a

0:39:39.239 --> 0:39:42.160
<v Speaker 1>handmade thing? Is something made by humans? Like a major

0:39:42.239 --> 0:39:46.280
<v Speaker 1>deity is uh is a metal detector, or a major

0:39:46.320 --> 0:39:49.160
<v Speaker 1>deity is a sword. My my, my answer would be

0:39:49.239 --> 0:39:51.480
<v Speaker 1>would be two part. First of all, certainly nothing is

0:39:51.480 --> 0:39:54.239
<v Speaker 1>immediately coming to mind, though of course it could be

0:39:54.280 --> 0:39:57.560
<v Speaker 1>missing something. The other thing is that one of the problems,

0:39:57.760 --> 0:40:00.520
<v Speaker 1>or I guess one of the problems you get into

0:40:00.560 --> 0:40:03.720
<v Speaker 1>when you start asking this question about God's in various

0:40:03.719 --> 0:40:06.920
<v Speaker 1>belief systems is that you run into examples where God's

0:40:06.920 --> 0:40:10.759
<v Speaker 1>have multiple forms, right, they have multiple likenesses that ultimately

0:40:10.800 --> 0:40:14.080
<v Speaker 1>some up the uh, the the the larger and in

0:40:14.239 --> 0:40:18.480
<v Speaker 1>human quality of the god. Where so you it's conceivable

0:40:18.520 --> 0:40:21.000
<v Speaker 1>you might have a god that sometimes appears as say

0:40:21.000 --> 0:40:25.640
<v Speaker 1>a trident or as a sword, but inevitably that God

0:40:25.880 --> 0:40:29.800
<v Speaker 1>will also have other forms, if not within the same

0:40:29.920 --> 0:40:32.560
<v Speaker 1>belief system, than at least within the tradition of belief

0:40:32.920 --> 0:40:36.440
<v Speaker 1>in that entity. Yeah, I mean, yeah, I think you're right.

0:40:36.520 --> 0:40:39.680
<v Speaker 1>There are tons of God's that can metaphorically or maybe

0:40:39.719 --> 0:40:44.239
<v Speaker 1>even literally take forms of human made objects. Uh, much

0:40:44.280 --> 0:40:46.560
<v Speaker 1>more often if you accept a metaphorical uses. I mean,

0:40:46.600 --> 0:40:48.919
<v Speaker 1>like Jesus says I am the door. He that enters

0:40:48.960 --> 0:40:50.520
<v Speaker 1>me will be saved and will go in and out

0:40:50.520 --> 0:40:54.560
<v Speaker 1>to pasture, you know. But like, um, that's obviously meant

0:40:54.560 --> 0:40:57.160
<v Speaker 1>as like a metaphor. It's just saying like it is

0:40:57.200 --> 0:41:01.640
<v Speaker 1>through me that something will happen. Right, Surely there are myths.

0:41:01.680 --> 0:41:04.360
<v Speaker 1>I didn't find any directly, but surely there are myths

0:41:04.360 --> 0:41:09.000
<v Speaker 1>of gods that have sort of anthropomorphic forms, generally appearing

0:41:09.200 --> 0:41:12.600
<v Speaker 1>in the forms of weapons. That's got to happen. Well, yeah,

0:41:12.719 --> 0:41:14.319
<v Speaker 1>it would be interesting to look into that more and

0:41:14.320 --> 0:41:16.600
<v Speaker 1>I look for specific examples of that. All right, we're

0:41:16.600 --> 0:41:18.759
<v Speaker 1>gonna take another break, but when we come back, we

0:41:18.760 --> 0:41:26.240
<v Speaker 1>are going to consider some facial recognition emails. Thank alright,

0:41:26.239 --> 0:41:28.880
<v Speaker 1>we're back, all right. So these messages came in response

0:41:28.960 --> 0:41:33.799
<v Speaker 1>to the facial recognition episodes. We did this first one.

0:41:33.920 --> 0:41:37.000
<v Speaker 1>It comes from Jim in New Jersey. Jim says, Robert

0:41:37.080 --> 0:41:39.880
<v Speaker 1>and Joe, I have several thoughts in your latest facial

0:41:39.920 --> 0:41:43.320
<v Speaker 1>recognition episodes. When I was a teenager, I would develop

0:41:43.360 --> 0:41:45.600
<v Speaker 1>a crush on a girl, but I was also too

0:41:45.600 --> 0:41:48.200
<v Speaker 1>shy and awkward to approach her. I noticed I had

0:41:48.239 --> 0:41:51.160
<v Speaker 1>a very difficult time recalling her face when she was

0:41:51.239 --> 0:41:54.279
<v Speaker 1>not around. I don't recall having this for anyone else.

0:41:54.400 --> 0:41:56.759
<v Speaker 1>I have no idea of the cause. I figured it

0:41:56.800 --> 0:41:59.680
<v Speaker 1>was a mental tick as I struggled to figure out dating.

0:42:00.120 --> 0:42:01.759
<v Speaker 1>That was kind of interesting. I think we talked in

0:42:01.760 --> 0:42:05.800
<v Speaker 1>the episode about the ideas of facial recognition maybe being

0:42:05.960 --> 0:42:10.080
<v Speaker 1>um easier in cases where you engage less emotionally with

0:42:10.160 --> 0:42:15.400
<v Speaker 1>the face. I wonder um, Jim says, advanced forward several decades.

0:42:15.719 --> 0:42:17.919
<v Speaker 1>One day, I was passing a coworker in the hall

0:42:18.000 --> 0:42:21.080
<v Speaker 1>and we stopped to chat. Her face disappeared. It was

0:42:21.120 --> 0:42:24.040
<v Speaker 1>replaced with something kind of shimmery. I looked away and

0:42:24.080 --> 0:42:26.480
<v Speaker 1>noticed it wasn't just her face, it was this. It

0:42:26.560 --> 0:42:29.800
<v Speaker 1>was my center field of vision. I had previously scheduled

0:42:29.800 --> 0:42:32.480
<v Speaker 1>an eye appointment soon after that, and I described it

0:42:32.520 --> 0:42:34.920
<v Speaker 1>to the doctor. She very casually said that I had

0:42:34.920 --> 0:42:38.040
<v Speaker 1>experienced an ocular migraine and that I should worry about it.

0:42:38.040 --> 0:42:40.560
<v Speaker 1>I think maybe Jim means I shouldn't worry about it.

0:42:41.080 --> 0:42:44.280
<v Speaker 1>Um she got them too. I've only had a handful since,

0:42:44.320 --> 0:42:46.239
<v Speaker 1>and they tend to go away in a minute or two.

0:42:46.440 --> 0:42:49.680
<v Speaker 1>Oliver Sacks had them as well and wrote of them. Finally,

0:42:49.680 --> 0:42:53.400
<v Speaker 1>your discussion of law enforcement using facial recognition software produced

0:42:53.400 --> 0:42:55.359
<v Speaker 1>a scene in my mind. I'm sure we've all seen

0:42:55.400 --> 0:42:58.400
<v Speaker 1>in crime drama movies and television. It's the trope of

0:42:58.400 --> 0:43:01.080
<v Speaker 1>the corkboard and the detective room with photos of the

0:43:01.160 --> 0:43:05.160
<v Speaker 1>suspects and lines connecting them. What if facial recognition software

0:43:05.200 --> 0:43:09.160
<v Speaker 1>could produce these Here's my thought. Facial recognition software finds

0:43:09.160 --> 0:43:12.080
<v Speaker 1>the suspects face and photos scraped off the web. There

0:43:12.080 --> 0:43:14.920
<v Speaker 1>will certainly be others faces in some of these photos.

0:43:15.200 --> 0:43:17.759
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure we'll be able to identify these faces, which

0:43:17.760 --> 0:43:20.560
<v Speaker 1>could lead to other photos with new faces, and more

0:43:20.600 --> 0:43:24.439
<v Speaker 1>photos with more faces. Each photo with multiple faces would

0:43:24.440 --> 0:43:27.280
<v Speaker 1>be a link establishing relationship of those in the photo.

0:43:27.760 --> 0:43:31.520
<v Speaker 1>More shared photos would increase the strength of that relationship. Eventually,

0:43:31.600 --> 0:43:35.640
<v Speaker 1>probably very quickly, a network of closely related individuals would

0:43:35.640 --> 0:43:39.040
<v Speaker 1>emerge the gang, so to speak. We already have clustering

0:43:39.040 --> 0:43:41.680
<v Speaker 1>algorithms that do this. We might even be able to

0:43:41.719 --> 0:43:45.799
<v Speaker 1>identify subclusters and hierarchies within the organization. I'm not sure

0:43:45.840 --> 0:43:48.640
<v Speaker 1>if I find this idea really interesting or really frightening.

0:43:49.160 --> 0:43:52.360
<v Speaker 1>Uh Jim in New Jersey, and Jim also says thanks.

0:43:52.440 --> 0:43:54.680
<v Speaker 1>I now have the Friends theme song repeating in my

0:43:54.760 --> 0:43:56.839
<v Speaker 1>head as an earworm. I think that comes from us

0:43:56.840 --> 0:44:02.600
<v Speaker 1>talking about Jennifer Aniston cells Ester, Jennifer Anderson Cellsis. Yeah,

0:44:02.600 --> 0:44:05.799
<v Speaker 1>and we talked a little bit about about about the

0:44:05.840 --> 0:44:09.080
<v Speaker 1>about sitcoms and the house. Sometimes the characterism sitcoms are

0:44:09.080 --> 0:44:13.879
<v Speaker 1>so familiar that they are like actual friends. Right, here's

0:44:13.880 --> 0:44:16.680
<v Speaker 1>another one when comes to us from Liam Liam Wrights. Hey,

0:44:16.760 --> 0:44:18.520
<v Speaker 1>Joe and Robert. First of all, love the show as

0:44:18.560 --> 0:44:21.160
<v Speaker 1>well as invention I made to jump over from stuff

0:44:21.160 --> 0:44:23.080
<v Speaker 1>you should know just over a year ago and have

0:44:23.160 --> 0:44:26.719
<v Speaker 1>smashed your catalog in that time. Both your intellectual insights

0:44:27.040 --> 0:44:30.880
<v Speaker 1>and tight research really does blow my mind. Just finished

0:44:30.960 --> 0:44:33.759
<v Speaker 1>listening to the three part facial recognition apps. I'm the

0:44:33.840 --> 0:44:36.239
<v Speaker 1>kind of person that usually takes the side of if

0:44:36.280 --> 0:44:39.120
<v Speaker 1>you have nothing to hide, who cares, mainly because trying

0:44:39.120 --> 0:44:42.200
<v Speaker 1>to stop technology seems futile, so just go with the

0:44:42.239 --> 0:44:45.759
<v Speaker 1>flow and try and enjoy the terrifying ride. At the

0:44:45.800 --> 0:44:48.319
<v Speaker 1>start of the first episode, I thought, man, what's the

0:44:48.320 --> 0:44:50.800
<v Speaker 1>big deal? But by the end I was fully aboard

0:44:50.840 --> 0:44:53.560
<v Speaker 1>the bannit until we figured this out, boat. I do

0:44:53.680 --> 0:44:56.280
<v Speaker 1>find it interesting to think that for half a century

0:44:56.360 --> 0:44:58.680
<v Speaker 1>or more we've been waiting and hoping for a personal

0:44:58.880 --> 0:45:01.480
<v Speaker 1>helper robot to clean in our homes and make our dinner.

0:45:01.800 --> 0:45:04.480
<v Speaker 1>But this would require facial recognition to be a thing

0:45:04.920 --> 0:45:07.480
<v Speaker 1>and work flawlessly. Now it looks like we were very

0:45:07.480 --> 0:45:10.520
<v Speaker 1>close to it being a reality. I find it a

0:45:10.600 --> 0:45:13.200
<v Speaker 1>little creepy to imagine to help a robot that could

0:45:13.200 --> 0:45:17.320
<v Speaker 1>recognize me, even with a partially covered face, nefarious government

0:45:17.360 --> 0:45:20.360
<v Speaker 1>taps into your domestic robots to be spies, and the

0:45:20.440 --> 0:45:23.680
<v Speaker 1>home the story rights itself. Anyway, keep it up. I

0:45:23.719 --> 0:45:26.640
<v Speaker 1>recommend your show to anyone standing nearby who says the

0:45:26.680 --> 0:45:30.160
<v Speaker 1>word podcast cheers Liam. So it sounds like we scared you.

0:45:30.440 --> 0:45:31.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if we meant to scare you. I

0:45:31.840 --> 0:45:34.440
<v Speaker 1>guess we did mean to give you a fuller picture.

0:45:34.520 --> 0:45:38.320
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, well, I mean, I guess we did intend

0:45:38.400 --> 0:45:40.040
<v Speaker 1>to scare people, at least, I mean I felt a

0:45:40.080 --> 0:45:43.120
<v Speaker 1>little scared after researching it. I mean part of it.

0:45:43.200 --> 0:45:45.279
<v Speaker 1>I think the importance of it is that there is

0:45:45.320 --> 0:45:49.120
<v Speaker 1>a lot in technology that we have that we're anxious about.

0:45:50.080 --> 0:45:52.920
<v Speaker 1>But this is an area where, like our cultural anxiety

0:45:53.000 --> 0:45:56.799
<v Speaker 1>around it, I don't think has generally speaking, has not

0:45:56.960 --> 0:46:00.759
<v Speaker 1>risen to the appropriate level. So, you know, whatever we

0:46:00.800 --> 0:46:03.520
<v Speaker 1>can do to to help you fear the things in

0:46:03.560 --> 0:46:06.560
<v Speaker 1>technology that you should fear more like this, and perhaps

0:46:06.600 --> 0:46:08.759
<v Speaker 1>a little less in other categories that you might have

0:46:08.760 --> 0:46:11.520
<v Speaker 1>been freaking out about, like this is one that we're

0:46:11.520 --> 0:46:13.879
<v Speaker 1>also at a point where some things can be done,

0:46:13.920 --> 0:46:17.160
<v Speaker 1>Some things can uh, some you know, restrictions can be

0:46:17.160 --> 0:46:23.640
<v Speaker 1>put in place. It's not necessarily too late. Yeah, this

0:46:23.760 --> 0:46:26.560
<v Speaker 1>is followed through in the next email. This comes from Kenna.

0:46:26.960 --> 0:46:32.080
<v Speaker 1>Kenna said, Hi, Robert and Josh. Oh, thanks Kenneth, thanks

0:46:32.080 --> 0:46:35.120
<v Speaker 1>a lot. It's okay. I understand. Well, you know, she

0:46:35.560 --> 0:46:37.960
<v Speaker 1>maybe she thinks you're Robert and I'm Josh, so it

0:46:38.040 --> 0:46:41.520
<v Speaker 1>could go either way. Hi, Robert and Josh. I just

0:46:41.600 --> 0:46:44.319
<v Speaker 1>listened to all your facial recognition episodes back to back,

0:46:44.600 --> 0:46:46.920
<v Speaker 1>and I think, uh, and I think the people arguing

0:46:46.960 --> 0:46:49.920
<v Speaker 1>for only restricting these sorts of technologies by the end

0:46:50.000 --> 0:46:53.279
<v Speaker 1>user legal agreement covered in episode three are missing a

0:46:53.360 --> 0:46:57.799
<v Speaker 1>very major point tech monopolies and coercive end user agreements,

0:46:58.000 --> 0:47:00.440
<v Speaker 1>wherein you have to agree to the term terms in

0:47:00.520 --> 0:47:03.839
<v Speaker 1>order to access a necessary service. We talked a little

0:47:03.840 --> 0:47:05.400
<v Speaker 1>bit about this, I think, when we talked about like

0:47:05.520 --> 0:47:09.920
<v Speaker 1>using facial recognition for payment, but can it continues? For example,

0:47:10.000 --> 0:47:12.880
<v Speaker 1>one of the earlier episodes mentioned using facial recognition to

0:47:12.920 --> 0:47:17.080
<v Speaker 1>compile medical records of livestock applied to cows. This seems

0:47:17.120 --> 0:47:19.520
<v Speaker 1>like a good idea, but if it were instituted as

0:47:19.560 --> 0:47:22.800
<v Speaker 1>part of your electronic medical records or as your real

0:47:23.000 --> 0:47:26.360
<v Speaker 1>idea for voting, opting in would be a requirement for

0:47:26.440 --> 0:47:30.600
<v Speaker 1>civic participation or access to healthcare. Extrapolate that to public

0:47:30.640 --> 0:47:35.400
<v Speaker 1>school access, receiving government unemployment or disability benefits, or citizenship

0:47:35.520 --> 0:47:39.200
<v Speaker 1>verification for employment, and you can quickly make facial recognition

0:47:39.239 --> 0:47:42.560
<v Speaker 1>not only an insidious tool of surveillance, but an extremely

0:47:42.600 --> 0:47:46.560
<v Speaker 1>insecure one, much like social security numbers are becoming as

0:47:46.560 --> 0:47:48.960
<v Speaker 1>we're required to give them out more and more often

0:47:49.000 --> 0:47:52.200
<v Speaker 1>to verify our identity, our credit, and the like. Love

0:47:52.280 --> 0:47:55.600
<v Speaker 1>the episodes. They really clarified the reasoning behind my instinctive

0:47:55.680 --> 0:47:59.560
<v Speaker 1>dread of this particular form of surveillance. Kenna very good points,

0:47:59.600 --> 0:48:03.879
<v Speaker 1>I think. All right, here's another one. This one comes

0:48:03.880 --> 0:48:06.440
<v Speaker 1>to us from Eli. Hey, they're a big fan of

0:48:06.480 --> 0:48:08.600
<v Speaker 1>the show. I just had to write in because when

0:48:08.680 --> 0:48:11.839
<v Speaker 1>Robert said that dogs don't have faces, I mentally did

0:48:11.840 --> 0:48:15.000
<v Speaker 1>a double take. If that makes sense. I actually lost

0:48:15.040 --> 0:48:17.080
<v Speaker 1>my train of thought. I was listening to the podcast

0:48:17.120 --> 0:48:19.840
<v Speaker 1>at work because I instantly was gripped by the question

0:48:19.920 --> 0:48:23.000
<v Speaker 1>do people not think dogs have faces? And it's just me?

0:48:23.800 --> 0:48:26.600
<v Speaker 1>And then when Joe laughed, it seemed that my world

0:48:26.680 --> 0:48:30.520
<v Speaker 1>was turning right side back up. Not that my experience

0:48:30.600 --> 0:48:33.640
<v Speaker 1>is representative of a larger swath of humanity, but as

0:48:33.640 --> 0:48:36.040
<v Speaker 1>I thought about it, I've never heard of someone who

0:48:36.080 --> 0:48:40.000
<v Speaker 1>doesn't consider dogs, cats, or birds birds to have faces.

0:48:40.520 --> 0:48:43.040
<v Speaker 1>Here shocked and newly shocked, and it just seems like

0:48:43.080 --> 0:48:47.840
<v Speaker 1>a bird has less of a face. Faces anyway, Eli

0:48:47.920 --> 0:48:51.600
<v Speaker 1>continues frequently, both my wife and sister will refer to

0:48:51.760 --> 0:48:54.920
<v Speaker 1>dogs faces as they interpret their emotions or when describing

0:48:54.960 --> 0:48:57.120
<v Speaker 1>how cute they are. So thanks for saying that you

0:48:57.160 --> 0:48:59.479
<v Speaker 1>don't see it that way, Robert, because I had never

0:49:00.040 --> 0:49:02.879
<v Speaker 1>even suppose there was another way to see it. Keep

0:49:02.960 --> 0:49:05.840
<v Speaker 1>up the good work, Eli, you know, I share realized thoughts.

0:49:05.960 --> 0:49:09.719
<v Speaker 1>I know, seriously, I I don't see how you could

0:49:09.719 --> 0:49:12.160
<v Speaker 1>think dogs don't have faces. But I'm glad you don't.

0:49:12.200 --> 0:49:15.040
<v Speaker 1>I think that's very interesting. You have expanded my mind.

0:49:15.239 --> 0:49:17.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean that, Like I said, I'm not trying to

0:49:17.200 --> 0:49:20.560
<v Speaker 1>convince anybody of this um this way of thinking about

0:49:21.560 --> 0:49:23.880
<v Speaker 1>about faces. But if I were to, if there was

0:49:23.920 --> 0:49:26.880
<v Speaker 1>like a you know these kind of like um uh,

0:49:26.920 --> 0:49:30.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, human identity tests that they give you sometimes,

0:49:30.120 --> 0:49:32.120
<v Speaker 1>like there'll be a grid of squares and you have

0:49:32.200 --> 0:49:35.200
<v Speaker 1>to highlight all the squares that have stop signs in them.

0:49:35.320 --> 0:49:37.160
<v Speaker 1>If I were presented with one of those, and you

0:49:37.239 --> 0:49:39.879
<v Speaker 1>had like human faces and some and then you had

0:49:39.880 --> 0:49:42.080
<v Speaker 1>some pictures of like cats and dogs and the others,

0:49:42.120 --> 0:49:44.200
<v Speaker 1>and it says mark all the ones that have faces,

0:49:44.640 --> 0:49:46.839
<v Speaker 1>I guess I would fail that test and they would

0:49:46.880 --> 0:49:50.920
<v Speaker 1>consider me to be some sort of Internet scrying robot.

0:49:51.360 --> 0:49:53.560
<v Speaker 1>But no, that'd be good you You'd be sabotaging the

0:49:53.600 --> 0:49:59.440
<v Speaker 1>machine for our for our benefit in the long run. Okay, okay,

0:50:00.200 --> 0:50:02.640
<v Speaker 1>I think we should transition to talking about some feedback

0:50:02.680 --> 0:50:05.000
<v Speaker 1>we got on our episode on Band or Snatch, where

0:50:05.000 --> 0:50:07.440
<v Speaker 1>we talked a good bit about free will, whether this

0:50:07.520 --> 0:50:10.839
<v Speaker 1>concept makes any sense, how issues of it are highlighted by,

0:50:11.400 --> 0:50:14.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, the ways that technology may be accommodating our

0:50:14.560 --> 0:50:18.000
<v Speaker 1>preferences without us even knowing it. This first message comes

0:50:18.000 --> 0:50:21.840
<v Speaker 1>to us from Andreas. Andrea says, Hi, guys, on the

0:50:21.880 --> 0:50:25.080
<v Speaker 1>band or Snatch episode, you mentioned the possibility of movie

0:50:25.080 --> 0:50:28.840
<v Speaker 1>content to be specifically tailored to specific audiences, based on,

0:50:28.920 --> 0:50:32.799
<v Speaker 1>for example, their ideological or political profiles, and I think

0:50:32.840 --> 0:50:36.120
<v Speaker 1>you insinuated that this might be a positive experience for

0:50:36.160 --> 0:50:39.640
<v Speaker 1>the user, the underlying reasoning being, of course, that their

0:50:39.680 --> 0:50:43.279
<v Speaker 1>own world view is reinforced. To clarify, I definitely didn't

0:50:43.280 --> 0:50:46.120
<v Speaker 1>mean it would be positive, but I uh. We did

0:50:46.120 --> 0:50:48.719
<v Speaker 1>talk about how companies might assume that this would be

0:50:48.760 --> 0:50:51.880
<v Speaker 1>more palatable to a wider range of users, which I

0:50:51.880 --> 0:50:54.520
<v Speaker 1>think is probably true. That might be different than being

0:50:54.560 --> 0:50:58.280
<v Speaker 1>actually beneficial. Andreas continues to challenge this. I would posit

0:50:58.360 --> 0:51:01.720
<v Speaker 1>the following two options, but with their own worldly consequences.

0:51:02.120 --> 0:51:05.839
<v Speaker 1>A human beings are inherently flawed, and that we instinctively

0:51:05.880 --> 0:51:08.960
<v Speaker 1>seek to reinforce our own beliefs and that technology will

0:51:09.000 --> 0:51:13.640
<v Speaker 1>inevitably drive us towards an increasingly polarized world of ideological bubbles.

0:51:13.640 --> 0:51:16.840
<v Speaker 1>This option would confirm your thesis on the Bandersnatch episode.

0:51:17.160 --> 0:51:21.120
<v Speaker 1>But there's another option. Be human beings are inherently flawed,

0:51:21.120 --> 0:51:23.240
<v Speaker 1>and that we have a longing and desire for stories

0:51:23.280 --> 0:51:27.000
<v Speaker 1>and legends to contain our own ideologies, and very importantly,

0:51:27.360 --> 0:51:30.960
<v Speaker 1>for those ideologies to be disseminated to and adopted by

0:51:31.120 --> 0:51:34.520
<v Speaker 1>more people, not to reinforce our own beliefs, but to

0:51:34.600 --> 0:51:37.719
<v Speaker 1>impose or bring those beliefs on others, perhaps with the

0:51:37.760 --> 0:51:41.799
<v Speaker 1>motivation of growing and strengthening the tribe with which we identify.

0:51:42.280 --> 0:51:45.480
<v Speaker 1>If B is true, assuming that the movie watching audience

0:51:45.560 --> 0:51:48.920
<v Speaker 1>is aware that the content they're watching is specifically tailored

0:51:48.960 --> 0:51:51.000
<v Speaker 1>to them, So again, this would be like you know,

0:51:51.040 --> 0:51:53.279
<v Speaker 1>you watch the movie and it just like there are

0:51:53.360 --> 0:51:56.120
<v Speaker 1>multiple versions of each scene filmed, where you can get

0:51:56.160 --> 0:51:59.480
<v Speaker 1>the version that that the computer thinks is most suitable

0:51:59.520 --> 0:52:04.600
<v Speaker 1>to your personality. Um, and they would arguably not find

0:52:04.640 --> 0:52:07.520
<v Speaker 1>any additional pleasure in watching a story with a worldview

0:52:07.560 --> 0:52:10.080
<v Speaker 1>consistent with their own, since they would know that it

0:52:10.120 --> 0:52:12.680
<v Speaker 1>was only themselves who got to see it, and that

0:52:12.760 --> 0:52:15.319
<v Speaker 1>their world view would not be disseminated to others who

0:52:15.360 --> 0:52:18.240
<v Speaker 1>disagreed with it. As an example, would you rather watch

0:52:18.640 --> 0:52:22.320
<v Speaker 1>a a political commentator on your favorite political TV channel

0:52:22.640 --> 0:52:26.520
<v Speaker 1>stating a point with which you agree, or be watched

0:52:26.560 --> 0:52:29.000
<v Speaker 1>the same political commentator go on a news show that

0:52:29.080 --> 0:52:33.120
<v Speaker 1>typically hosts different political views and make the same statements there.

0:52:33.600 --> 0:52:36.400
<v Speaker 1>In both cases, your world view is reinforced, but the

0:52:36.440 --> 0:52:39.880
<v Speaker 1>second option, it is also disseminated to people who disagree

0:52:39.920 --> 0:52:42.919
<v Speaker 1>with it. Uh and Andreas thinks that people will find

0:52:42.960 --> 0:52:45.960
<v Speaker 1>this much more satisfying. I think that we want to

0:52:46.000 --> 0:52:48.560
<v Speaker 1>see our beliefs reinforced, but only in so far as

0:52:48.600 --> 0:52:51.919
<v Speaker 1>they are communicated to others. Hence, the pleasure someone might

0:52:51.920 --> 0:52:55.040
<v Speaker 1>take in, for example, watching a strongman's speech in a movie,

0:52:55.280 --> 0:52:58.120
<v Speaker 1>does not solely come from the speech matching their belief

0:52:58.400 --> 0:53:00.880
<v Speaker 1>but from them agreeing with it and into more importantly,

0:53:01.000 --> 0:53:04.640
<v Speaker 1>knowing that others will hear this supposedly important speech. I

0:53:04.680 --> 0:53:08.319
<v Speaker 1>wonder what you think. Thanks for the great show, Andreas. Uh.

0:53:08.440 --> 0:53:10.319
<v Speaker 1>I think this makes a sort of good point. But

0:53:10.400 --> 0:53:13.120
<v Speaker 1>I think that these are both true to some extent,

0:53:13.200 --> 0:53:18.480
<v Speaker 1>because hearing statements we strongly already agree with is inherently pleasing.

0:53:18.520 --> 0:53:22.839
<v Speaker 1>For multiple reasons. For example, processing fluency. You know, we've

0:53:22.840 --> 0:53:25.360
<v Speaker 1>talked about this on the show before. We naturally find

0:53:25.440 --> 0:53:29.280
<v Speaker 1>ideas all kinds of stimuli, not just statements about politics,

0:53:29.320 --> 0:53:32.280
<v Speaker 1>but you know, art and stuff like that, more pleasing

0:53:32.400 --> 0:53:35.560
<v Speaker 1>when we're more familiar with it, when it is easily

0:53:35.600 --> 0:53:38.200
<v Speaker 1>processed by the brain, because the brain is lazy and

0:53:38.239 --> 0:53:40.480
<v Speaker 1>it likes things that are easy to take in and

0:53:40.520 --> 0:53:43.440
<v Speaker 1>make sense of. But then also, you know, there are

0:53:43.440 --> 0:53:45.680
<v Speaker 1>other reasons why it might feel good, like creating a

0:53:45.680 --> 0:53:49.800
<v Speaker 1>feeling of social inclusion. Uh. But I agree with Andreas

0:53:49.840 --> 0:53:52.400
<v Speaker 1>that we also like the idea of statements we agree

0:53:52.400 --> 0:53:55.080
<v Speaker 1>with being spread to others in the context of a

0:53:55.120 --> 0:53:58.640
<v Speaker 1>fictional TV show. Um, you know, we're watching it for

0:53:58.800 --> 0:54:03.440
<v Speaker 1>entertainment and relaxation. Usually I can see pure processing fluency

0:54:03.480 --> 0:54:07.200
<v Speaker 1>advantage driving a big slice of the behavioral pie about

0:54:07.200 --> 0:54:11.040
<v Speaker 1>how people would actually express their preferences. Yeah, you know,

0:54:11.080 --> 0:54:15.080
<v Speaker 1>Andreas brings brings up some good points here. I feel

0:54:15.320 --> 0:54:18.320
<v Speaker 1>a little differently about the uh, you know, the the

0:54:19.040 --> 0:54:24.759
<v Speaker 1>the possibility a versus possibility be because possibility be in

0:54:24.800 --> 0:54:27.720
<v Speaker 1>which you know, your your favorite political commentator or whatever

0:54:27.760 --> 0:54:30.560
<v Speaker 1>goes on a show and shares this idea with others.

0:54:31.200 --> 0:54:33.560
<v Speaker 1>That sounds a lot like to put it in a

0:54:33.680 --> 0:54:36.680
<v Speaker 1>like a film connotation, like a movie going connotation, like

0:54:37.000 --> 0:54:39.719
<v Speaker 1>watching a film that you're into with a hostile audience

0:54:40.080 --> 0:54:42.440
<v Speaker 1>and that does not sound pleasant to me. That sounds

0:54:42.480 --> 0:54:45.480
<v Speaker 1>like something I would wish to avoid at all costs,

0:54:45.800 --> 0:54:48.720
<v Speaker 1>because I don't want I would prefer to enjoy something

0:54:48.760 --> 0:54:52.160
<v Speaker 1>I like with like minded people that will also enjoy

0:54:52.239 --> 0:54:55.000
<v Speaker 1>it and I and I I'm not one of those

0:54:55.000 --> 0:54:57.600
<v Speaker 1>people that it's where I want to then see my

0:54:57.800 --> 0:55:00.480
<v Speaker 1>the things I love like battered into other people like

0:55:00.600 --> 0:55:02.360
<v Speaker 1>I would. I would like to share things that I

0:55:02.400 --> 0:55:04.920
<v Speaker 1>like with other people that might be receptive to them.

0:55:04.960 --> 0:55:07.280
<v Speaker 1>But I'm not going to stand around trying to convince

0:55:07.320 --> 0:55:10.279
<v Speaker 1>somebody that say The Fly is a great movie if

0:55:10.400 --> 0:55:12.440
<v Speaker 1>I know they're just not the type of person who

0:55:12.480 --> 0:55:16.560
<v Speaker 1>likes this film. Well, here's a here's a counterpoint I'll

0:55:16.600 --> 0:55:19.560
<v Speaker 1>give you. I have a very specific memory about a

0:55:19.680 --> 0:55:22.200
<v Speaker 1>film with you know that could be interpreted in a

0:55:22.239 --> 0:55:25.359
<v Speaker 1>political way and a seemingly hostile audience. I remember when

0:55:25.400 --> 0:55:28.640
<v Speaker 1>I was in very conservative East Tennessee going to a

0:55:28.719 --> 0:55:31.840
<v Speaker 1>movie theater and seeing Brokeback Mountain in the theater and

0:55:31.880 --> 0:55:36.480
<v Speaker 1>I remember, specifically at the time, being concerned that there

0:55:36.480 --> 0:55:39.759
<v Speaker 1>would be people who would be in the audience with

0:55:39.960 --> 0:55:42.160
<v Speaker 1>like I don't know, with anti gay points of view,

0:55:42.320 --> 0:55:45.440
<v Speaker 1>reacting in a hostile way to the film in the theater,

0:55:46.280 --> 0:55:48.560
<v Speaker 1>and I remember early in the film there were some

0:55:48.600 --> 0:55:51.160
<v Speaker 1>people around me who, you know, they weren't hostile, but

0:55:51.200 --> 0:55:54.000
<v Speaker 1>they were kind of like snickering, like like the movie

0:55:54.120 --> 0:55:57.160
<v Speaker 1>was funny. And then at the end some of those

0:55:57.200 --> 0:55:59.960
<v Speaker 1>same people were walking out of the movie in tears,

0:56:00.560 --> 0:56:02.560
<v Speaker 1>and that I don't know that that was an interesting

0:56:02.600 --> 0:56:06.440
<v Speaker 1>experience because I felt like the movie um to to

0:56:06.560 --> 0:56:08.960
<v Speaker 1>an audience of people who might not necessarily have been

0:56:09.040 --> 0:56:12.800
<v Speaker 1>very sympathetic to the idea of of a romance between

0:56:12.840 --> 0:56:16.040
<v Speaker 1>two men originally for some reason ended up in the

0:56:16.040 --> 0:56:19.200
<v Speaker 1>theater watching this movie and then we're emotionally moved by it.

0:56:19.640 --> 0:56:21.560
<v Speaker 1>I guess one of the things that they had that

0:56:21.640 --> 0:56:24.720
<v Speaker 1>is most comforting about this scenario is that it comes

0:56:24.719 --> 0:56:26.680
<v Speaker 1>down to the fact that there is there is a

0:56:26.760 --> 0:56:31.279
<v Speaker 1>concrete version of this film. So if if anyone is

0:56:31.320 --> 0:56:33.600
<v Speaker 1>won over by some aspect of it, they are still

0:56:33.640 --> 0:56:37.399
<v Speaker 1>one over by the film Brokeback Mountain or or well

0:56:37.400 --> 0:56:39.759
<v Speaker 1>whatever the you know, the specific film. Example is but

0:56:39.840 --> 0:56:43.120
<v Speaker 1>you if we go into this like full future band

0:56:43.200 --> 0:56:47.359
<v Speaker 1>or snacks scenario, which I just to clarify again, I

0:56:47.440 --> 0:56:49.239
<v Speaker 1>was not bringing that up in the episode because I

0:56:49.280 --> 0:56:51.680
<v Speaker 1>was saying it's good. No, no, like yeah, like the

0:56:51.760 --> 0:56:54.359
<v Speaker 1>bad thing about it would mean that it would mean

0:56:54.480 --> 0:56:57.640
<v Speaker 1>nothing to say that you like a particular film exactly.

0:56:57.680 --> 0:57:01.360
<v Speaker 1>Brokeback Mountain is different for everybody who views it based

0:57:01.400 --> 0:57:04.840
<v Speaker 1>on their own pre existing uh, you know, religious or

0:57:04.880 --> 0:57:08.160
<v Speaker 1>political viewpoint. Then it means absolutely nothing to say you

0:57:08.200 --> 0:57:11.160
<v Speaker 1>like it because everybody will like it because the version

0:57:11.200 --> 0:57:14.040
<v Speaker 1>they are served will be the version that matches their

0:57:14.080 --> 0:57:17.240
<v Speaker 1>expectations and their values exactly. And I think that's a

0:57:17.320 --> 0:57:19.040
<v Speaker 1>very good wrinkle. Yeah, I mean it would. It would

0:57:19.080 --> 0:57:22.000
<v Speaker 1>totally change what it means to say that you that

0:57:22.080 --> 0:57:24.640
<v Speaker 1>you liked a movie or that you liked a TV show.

0:57:25.160 --> 0:57:28.280
<v Speaker 1>It would it would mean more like, you know, whatever

0:57:28.400 --> 0:57:31.640
<v Speaker 1>version of this the machine put together for me because

0:57:31.640 --> 0:57:34.320
<v Speaker 1>it thought I would like it, did indeed trigger my

0:57:34.400 --> 0:57:38.080
<v Speaker 1>pleasure centers. It would not represent a statement that was

0:57:38.120 --> 0:57:42.120
<v Speaker 1>applicable to anybody else's experience. And then how would people

0:57:42.160 --> 0:57:44.640
<v Speaker 1>have hot takes on films anymore? Right? Well, that might

0:57:44.720 --> 0:57:49.360
<v Speaker 1>be good but all right, here's another one. This one

0:57:49.400 --> 0:57:52.200
<v Speaker 1>comes to us from m Cat m cat Rights. As

0:57:52.200 --> 0:57:55.080
<v Speaker 1>you discussed in the Basilist episode, the free will of

0:57:55.120 --> 0:57:57.400
<v Speaker 1>people are hard to predict, and I just wanted to

0:57:57.480 --> 0:58:00.000
<v Speaker 1>put in my input on your band or Snatch episod

0:58:00.000 --> 0:58:02.920
<v Speaker 1>it when I played through the episode of Bandersnatch, and

0:58:02.960 --> 0:58:05.240
<v Speaker 1>I believe m Kat is talking about actually watching the

0:58:05.280 --> 0:58:10.000
<v Speaker 1>episode of Black Mirrors. Yeah, I hated that they pushed

0:58:10.040 --> 0:58:13.040
<v Speaker 1>me to only two choices. Every time a choice came up.

0:58:13.320 --> 0:58:15.640
<v Speaker 1>As I played, I came up on the choice of

0:58:15.680 --> 0:58:18.760
<v Speaker 1>watching one of two characters die on screen. I really

0:58:18.760 --> 0:58:21.800
<v Speaker 1>didn't like it, so I chose a third option. Never prompted,

0:58:22.000 --> 0:58:25.360
<v Speaker 1>I quit watching. I stopped the episode and never watched

0:58:25.360 --> 0:58:29.000
<v Speaker 1>it again. I refused the two choices always put forth.

0:58:29.320 --> 0:58:31.520
<v Speaker 1>I kind of felt heroic, feeling like I saved a

0:58:31.560 --> 0:58:33.840
<v Speaker 1>life doing it. But I feel like you didn't even

0:58:33.880 --> 0:58:37.400
<v Speaker 1>possibly think of this on the episode you recorded on

0:58:37.440 --> 0:58:40.880
<v Speaker 1>the Bandersnatch. Personally, I hate being forced to an A

0:58:41.120 --> 0:58:44.080
<v Speaker 1>or be choice. There's many ways to think about an option,

0:58:44.280 --> 0:58:47.120
<v Speaker 1>but I feel like personally that people don't think outside

0:58:47.160 --> 0:58:50.640
<v Speaker 1>the box. Hopefully someone else also said this to help

0:58:51.200 --> 0:58:53.720
<v Speaker 1>think on the options, but also I love your podcast

0:58:54.000 --> 0:58:56.160
<v Speaker 1>and you help my three year old son fall asleep

0:58:56.200 --> 0:58:58.520
<v Speaker 1>with your calm voices. Plus I get to learn on

0:58:58.560 --> 0:59:01.400
<v Speaker 1>the side. Thanks for your critical thinking skills, and I

0:59:01.440 --> 0:59:04.960
<v Speaker 1>will always be a fan m cat. Yeah. Yeah, And

0:59:05.040 --> 0:59:07.320
<v Speaker 1>certainly one always has the option of turning it off,

0:59:07.600 --> 0:59:10.280
<v Speaker 1>which which is it's I think it's valuable to h

0:59:10.760 --> 0:59:12.360
<v Speaker 1>to keep that in mind, is that you can always

0:59:12.440 --> 0:59:16.440
<v Speaker 1>just reject the thing that you're you're interacting with. Like

0:59:16.480 --> 0:59:20.120
<v Speaker 1>I actually had this conversation with my son recently because

0:59:20.160 --> 0:59:23.320
<v Speaker 1>we were watching we happen to come come across like

0:59:23.400 --> 0:59:28.200
<v Speaker 1>shortlisted films for Best Animated Short, uh, and we watched

0:59:28.200 --> 0:59:31.200
<v Speaker 1>this one about this um these two stuffed animals that

0:59:31.280 --> 0:59:33.439
<v Speaker 1>live in a sushi restaurant, and it was really sad.

0:59:33.480 --> 0:59:36.040
<v Speaker 1>It was like a sad, little little short and he

0:59:36.080 --> 0:59:38.920
<v Speaker 1>didn't like it. It made him feel sad, and so

0:59:38.960 --> 0:59:40.360
<v Speaker 1>I had to explain to it's like, well, you know,

0:59:40.560 --> 0:59:44.600
<v Speaker 1>one of the things about about watching shows and you know,

0:59:44.640 --> 0:59:47.760
<v Speaker 1>engaging with art is that if you don't ultimately don't

0:59:47.840 --> 0:59:50.080
<v Speaker 1>like it, it's totally okay to just to not like it,

0:59:50.120 --> 0:59:53.600
<v Speaker 1>to reject it and say I'm not gonna let this

0:59:53.640 --> 0:59:55.400
<v Speaker 1>one you know, really be a part of my mind

0:59:55.480 --> 0:59:59.240
<v Speaker 1>anymore than it has to be. Uh So, I mean

0:59:59.320 --> 1:00:01.840
<v Speaker 1>that's kind of an over explanation of the obvious. But

1:00:02.120 --> 1:00:04.600
<v Speaker 1>if you don't like it, uh yeah, turn it off.

1:00:04.640 --> 1:00:07.000
<v Speaker 1>And I don't mean that starthily, but we have to

1:00:07.080 --> 1:00:09.040
<v Speaker 1>we have to. I think sometimes we have to remember that,

1:00:09.120 --> 1:00:13.360
<v Speaker 1>given especially given like how important media is in our culture,

1:00:13.560 --> 1:00:17.360
<v Speaker 1>that it's okay to just opt out of things that uh,

1:00:17.360 --> 1:00:19.120
<v Speaker 1>you know don't make us happy, and we should be

1:00:19.120 --> 1:00:24.000
<v Speaker 1>doing a lot more opting out. Yeah, okay. To address

1:00:24.080 --> 1:00:26.240
<v Speaker 1>one more thing in response to band or Snatch, I

1:00:26.320 --> 1:00:29.919
<v Speaker 1>just have to uh address a Taylor wrote in We're

1:00:29.920 --> 1:00:31.360
<v Speaker 1>not going to read this one in full, but but

1:00:31.480 --> 1:00:35.680
<v Speaker 1>Taylor mentions quote in the episode Joe remarks that interactive

1:00:35.760 --> 1:00:39.919
<v Speaker 1>storytelling in video games was a mostly failed device. I'll

1:00:39.960 --> 1:00:42.440
<v Speaker 1>forgive you, Joe, because I know you aren't a big gamer,

1:00:42.480 --> 1:00:45.920
<v Speaker 1>but this absolutely is not the case. Player driven narratives

1:00:45.920 --> 1:00:48.680
<v Speaker 1>are hugely popular and Triple A and indie video game

1:00:48.720 --> 1:00:51.920
<v Speaker 1>titles alike, and are arguably the most popular method of

1:00:51.960 --> 1:00:55.960
<v Speaker 1>storytelling in video games. Um So, whatever I said here,

1:00:55.960 --> 1:00:58.560
<v Speaker 1>I probably failed to communicate what I meant to communicate,

1:00:58.600 --> 1:01:00.760
<v Speaker 1>which I was trying to refer back to the style

1:01:00.800 --> 1:01:04.600
<v Speaker 1>of interactive movie games that were popular on CD ROM

1:01:04.600 --> 1:01:07.880
<v Speaker 1>and laser disc in the nineties. Do you remember these, Robert, Yeah,

1:01:07.880 --> 1:01:11.160
<v Speaker 1>where it's it's more in keeping with banner snatches, it's

1:01:11.160 --> 1:01:15.320
<v Speaker 1>a movie. Yeah, Like, there were several like high profile

1:01:15.440 --> 1:01:19.680
<v Speaker 1>ones that were like major flops that were widely criticized. Uh.

1:01:19.760 --> 1:01:21.880
<v Speaker 1>When I when I do play modern video games, it's

1:01:21.920 --> 1:01:24.400
<v Speaker 1>absolutely good story driven games that I like, I don't

1:01:24.400 --> 1:01:26.960
<v Speaker 1>mess around with, you know, multiplayer games or whatever that

1:01:27.040 --> 1:01:30.000
<v Speaker 1>stuff is. So yes, I am aware of, uh, like,

1:01:30.360 --> 1:01:33.680
<v Speaker 1>narrative based video games, and we've talked about some on

1:01:33.680 --> 1:01:37.480
<v Speaker 1>the show before, like Soma and things like that. So

1:01:37.680 --> 1:01:40.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry if I was inarticulate about that. I the

1:01:40.480 --> 1:01:43.160
<v Speaker 1>ones I meant had failed had been the CD ROM

1:01:43.240 --> 1:01:46.840
<v Speaker 1>interactive movies, which like, Yeah, basically, I think the point

1:01:46.960 --> 1:01:48.920
<v Speaker 1>you and I were both trying to make is that

1:01:49.240 --> 1:01:53.520
<v Speaker 1>this idea of a cinematic experience, like a purely cinematic

1:01:53.560 --> 1:01:59.439
<v Speaker 1>experience that is also subject to audience choices, has never

1:01:59.720 --> 1:02:03.680
<v Speaker 1>full taken off, and certainly has never rivaled the more

1:02:03.720 --> 1:02:06.919
<v Speaker 1>traditional cinematic experience. Yeah, I think the narrative can work

1:02:07.160 --> 1:02:11.360
<v Speaker 1>in a more consistently active experience like a video game.

1:02:11.400 --> 1:02:13.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think one thing that's jarring about something

1:02:13.840 --> 1:02:16.640
<v Speaker 1>like Band or Snatch or any of these interactive movies

1:02:17.200 --> 1:02:20.080
<v Speaker 1>is that you're constantly being sort of jostled back and

1:02:20.160 --> 1:02:23.080
<v Speaker 1>forth between experiencing it in a passive way and then

1:02:23.120 --> 1:02:27.320
<v Speaker 1>suddenly having to engage. And that is just not It's

1:02:27.360 --> 1:02:31.240
<v Speaker 1>not a very smooth experience. It's not it's not necessarily

1:02:31.280 --> 1:02:35.040
<v Speaker 1>a very pleasurable experience. It's better to be more in

1:02:35.080 --> 1:02:38.400
<v Speaker 1>the fully active mode consistently, or in the fully passive

1:02:38.400 --> 1:02:41.000
<v Speaker 1>mode consistently. Either want to be a driver or a passenger,

1:02:41.080 --> 1:02:43.040
<v Speaker 1>but you don't want to suddenly have to switch back

1:02:43.080 --> 1:02:45.600
<v Speaker 1>and forth between the two. That's a that's a great metaphor. Yeah,

1:02:45.680 --> 1:02:47.720
<v Speaker 1>Like what would it be like to be writing where

1:02:47.720 --> 1:02:49.720
<v Speaker 1>you kept having to reach over and take the wheel

1:02:49.760 --> 1:02:52.640
<v Speaker 1>every few miles? All right, let's get to a few

1:02:52.640 --> 1:02:54.640
<v Speaker 1>more listener mails here. We have something that came in

1:02:54.880 --> 1:02:57.760
<v Speaker 1>regarding our our tenth anniversary episode. This is the episode

1:02:57.800 --> 1:03:00.840
<v Speaker 1>where Alison louder Milk, my original co host on the show,

1:03:00.880 --> 1:03:03.160
<v Speaker 1>came back on board and we we all caught up

1:03:03.200 --> 1:03:05.720
<v Speaker 1>about We've got everybody caught up about like what's going

1:03:05.760 --> 1:03:08.840
<v Speaker 1>on with how Stuff Works? And uh the former stuff

1:03:08.920 --> 1:03:11.160
<v Speaker 1>podcast like Stuff to Build your Mind. We talked about

1:03:11.160 --> 1:03:12.840
<v Speaker 1>what How Stuff Works is up to, what Alison is

1:03:12.920 --> 1:03:15.240
<v Speaker 1>up to, and reminist a little bit about the the

1:03:15.320 --> 1:03:19.720
<v Speaker 1>early days of of podcasting and how stuff Works. Now.

1:03:19.760 --> 1:03:22.080
<v Speaker 1>When I pasted these into our document here, I made

1:03:22.080 --> 1:03:24.040
<v Speaker 1>some abridgements in all of them, so these won't be

1:03:24.080 --> 1:03:28.440
<v Speaker 1>read in full, just a few comments from each. This

1:03:28.520 --> 1:03:32.320
<v Speaker 1>first one comes from Jim are frequent correspondent Jim in

1:03:32.360 --> 1:03:35.640
<v Speaker 1>New Jersey. He says, congratulations on ten years. I think

1:03:35.680 --> 1:03:39.040
<v Speaker 1>I've been listening since episode one. I checked my sent

1:03:39.200 --> 1:03:41.200
<v Speaker 1>email and as best I can tell, I've written to

1:03:41.240 --> 1:03:44.840
<v Speaker 1>you seventy seven now seventy eight times, he says. The

1:03:44.840 --> 1:03:47.080
<v Speaker 1>first time he wrote in was two thousand eleven. About

1:03:47.080 --> 1:03:50.240
<v Speaker 1>whether mathematics is an invention or a discovery, he argued

1:03:50.240 --> 1:03:53.360
<v Speaker 1>as kind of both, I think, he argued, it's kind

1:03:53.400 --> 1:03:55.920
<v Speaker 1>of like the rules of chess. You know, like you

1:03:55.960 --> 1:03:59.680
<v Speaker 1>can discover strategies, but you also like invent the rules

1:03:59.680 --> 1:04:02.360
<v Speaker 1>to be with uh, And then Jim says, may you

1:04:02.360 --> 1:04:04.840
<v Speaker 1>have many more years to educate and entertain us. Jim

1:04:04.840 --> 1:04:07.920
<v Speaker 1>in New Jersey. Jim, Yeah, Jim has an ability there

1:04:07.960 --> 1:04:10.040
<v Speaker 1>with the emails that we do not have because we've

1:04:10.160 --> 1:04:14.040
<v Speaker 1>changed owners enough time and we've changed email addresses enough

1:04:14.080 --> 1:04:16.800
<v Speaker 1>time that like I have no I have no access

1:04:16.880 --> 1:04:19.520
<v Speaker 1>to the old emails anymore. Yeah, you can't, can't search

1:04:19.560 --> 1:04:22.960
<v Speaker 1>all the way back, all right? This one comes to

1:04:23.040 --> 1:04:25.840
<v Speaker 1>us from Nathan to Robert Allison, Julie and all the

1:04:25.880 --> 1:04:28.200
<v Speaker 1>hosts who followed after. Thank you for being part of

1:04:28.200 --> 1:04:30.520
<v Speaker 1>my life. Ten years ago, I finished a decade in

1:04:30.560 --> 1:04:33.040
<v Speaker 1>the Army and got my first smartphone, where I found

1:04:33.040 --> 1:04:36.400
<v Speaker 1>a podcast out. The first podcast I listened to was

1:04:36.520 --> 1:04:39.600
<v Speaker 1>Quirks and Quarks, followed in a few weeks with Stuff

1:04:39.640 --> 1:04:42.160
<v Speaker 1>in the Science Lab. Your show became so much more

1:04:42.200 --> 1:04:44.440
<v Speaker 1>than I expected. For the next five years I listened

1:04:44.480 --> 1:04:48.240
<v Speaker 1>and became a legitimately different person. Despite being interested in science.

1:04:48.280 --> 1:04:50.520
<v Speaker 1>I was raised as a Young Earth creationist and had

1:04:50.560 --> 1:04:53.560
<v Speaker 1>lots of barriers to scientific thinking that we're just a

1:04:53.640 --> 1:04:57.000
<v Speaker 1>part of my learning. Your clear explanation of scientific ideas

1:04:57.000 --> 1:04:59.920
<v Speaker 1>and your willingness to revel in not knowing everything was

1:05:00.000 --> 1:05:02.680
<v Speaker 1>one of the most refreshing things I could have at

1:05:02.720 --> 1:05:05.560
<v Speaker 1>that time. And then Nathan goes on to say, so

1:05:05.680 --> 1:05:10.160
<v Speaker 1>some other nice things. But but that's the quick summary there.

1:05:10.320 --> 1:05:12.120
<v Speaker 1>I will say, I think a strength of our show

1:05:12.160 --> 1:05:15.000
<v Speaker 1>is that we revel in not knowing everything. Yes, yeah,

1:05:15.640 --> 1:05:19.360
<v Speaker 1>um yeah. I think that that is important is to

1:05:19.080 --> 1:05:22.560
<v Speaker 1>ye to realize that there's there's not just knowing and

1:05:22.600 --> 1:05:25.200
<v Speaker 1>not knowing. There is there is the journey between the

1:05:25.200 --> 1:05:31.440
<v Speaker 1>two and and certain the ultimate knowledge, ultimate whatever you know.

1:05:31.520 --> 1:05:34.240
<v Speaker 1>It's like we're all on a on a continuing journey

1:05:34.440 --> 1:05:39.640
<v Speaker 1>of exploration and self betterment. And uh, that's just we

1:05:39.800 --> 1:05:42.479
<v Speaker 1>that the more willing we are to accept that, I think,

1:05:43.040 --> 1:05:47.720
<v Speaker 1>the more peaceful our lives are. Alright. This next message

1:05:47.760 --> 1:05:50.960
<v Speaker 1>comes from Josh. Josh says, Hello, Robert and Joe and

1:05:51.080 --> 1:05:53.320
<v Speaker 1>Christian two. I heard you guys mentioned on the tenth

1:05:53.360 --> 1:05:56.120
<v Speaker 1>anniversary show how much you appreciate it when listeners tell

1:05:56.160 --> 1:05:59.200
<v Speaker 1>you the show changed their lives. I thought you might

1:05:59.200 --> 1:06:03.000
<v Speaker 1>appreciate my story. I'm currently an engineering PhD students studying

1:06:03.000 --> 1:06:07.200
<v Speaker 1>how bacteria interact with engineered nano materials. A large part

1:06:07.200 --> 1:06:09.479
<v Speaker 1>of why I decided to pursue a PhD is because

1:06:09.480 --> 1:06:12.560
<v Speaker 1>of the attitude towards science is a continuous quest for knowledge.

1:06:12.560 --> 1:06:14.920
<v Speaker 1>Shows like Stuff to Blow Your Mind have imparted on me.

1:06:15.320 --> 1:06:18.120
<v Speaker 1>I started listening to podcasts about four years ago, and

1:06:18.160 --> 1:06:20.720
<v Speaker 1>while many shows have been added or cut from my feet,

1:06:20.720 --> 1:06:24.040
<v Speaker 1>I've always kept stuff to blow your mind. Sincerely, Josh,

1:06:24.320 --> 1:06:26.840
<v Speaker 1>oh that that that is that is really sweet to

1:06:26.880 --> 1:06:30.600
<v Speaker 1>hear and and and certainly, yeah, we are super grateful

1:06:30.640 --> 1:06:33.360
<v Speaker 1>of anyone who who hangs with the show or or

1:06:33.400 --> 1:06:35.520
<v Speaker 1>even discovers as a new because there's just so much.

1:06:35.760 --> 1:06:38.640
<v Speaker 1>There's so much out there today. There's so many podcasts.

1:06:39.160 --> 1:06:43.000
<v Speaker 1>Every you know, every expert seems to have a podcast

1:06:43.040 --> 1:06:46.240
<v Speaker 1>these days. Every celebrity has a podcast. There's so many

1:06:46.360 --> 1:06:50.360
<v Speaker 1>wonderful shows and also just a lot of noise as well.

1:06:50.880 --> 1:06:55.320
<v Speaker 1>But uh, you know, we feel privileged anytime we listeners

1:06:55.760 --> 1:06:58.880
<v Speaker 1>continue to keep us in their feet, and you know,

1:06:59.080 --> 1:07:01.520
<v Speaker 1>we we don't take that lightly. We realized that that

1:07:01.720 --> 1:07:06.880
<v Speaker 1>is the place that that has that has to be earned, alright.

1:07:06.880 --> 1:07:09.360
<v Speaker 1>This one comes to us from Anne and writes in

1:07:09.440 --> 1:07:12.520
<v Speaker 1>and says, Hi, Robert and Joe, congratulations on hitting ten

1:07:12.600 --> 1:07:15.640
<v Speaker 1>years of the podcast. I've listened to nearly the entire archive.

1:07:15.960 --> 1:07:18.120
<v Speaker 1>I just need to listen to the first two episodes,

1:07:18.400 --> 1:07:22.400
<v Speaker 1>How Fighting Asteroids Works and Amazing Infestations, which were mentioned

1:07:22.400 --> 1:07:25.919
<v Speaker 1>in today's anniversary special Allison was a great blast from

1:07:25.920 --> 1:07:28.560
<v Speaker 1>the past. Uh. And then she goes on to suggest

1:07:28.600 --> 1:07:31.160
<v Speaker 1>that some day someday we should explore the concept of

1:07:31.480 --> 1:07:36.400
<v Speaker 1>deja rev. Is it deja rev I don't know literally

1:07:36.440 --> 1:07:41.200
<v Speaker 1>translating to already dreamed? Have we ever experienced it? I

1:07:41.240 --> 1:07:43.480
<v Speaker 1>assume she means, um, if we've ever had a dream

1:07:43.560 --> 1:07:46.280
<v Speaker 1>that we feel like we've we've dreamt before. I think

1:07:46.280 --> 1:07:47.960
<v Speaker 1>it's the other way around. I think it's you ever

1:07:48.000 --> 1:07:50.720
<v Speaker 1>have the experience. It's like deja vou. But instead of

1:07:50.720 --> 1:07:53.560
<v Speaker 1>thinking I already did this, you think I dreamed this,

1:07:54.400 --> 1:07:57.680
<v Speaker 1>I've absolutely had that experience. I remember feeling that very

1:07:57.760 --> 1:08:01.120
<v Speaker 1>strongly as a child. I there's one that's stuck out

1:08:01.160 --> 1:08:03.320
<v Speaker 1>in my mind where um, I was in the front

1:08:03.440 --> 1:08:06.480
<v Speaker 1>yard playing with some friends and I was running around

1:08:06.640 --> 1:08:09.400
<v Speaker 1>and I ran into a low lying branch like hit

1:08:09.480 --> 1:08:12.720
<v Speaker 1>me in the eye. And I remember that at the

1:08:12.720 --> 1:08:16.479
<v Speaker 1>time just having this powerful feeling of this just happened

1:08:16.520 --> 1:08:19.320
<v Speaker 1>to me in a dream. I dreamed this entire scene

1:08:19.640 --> 1:08:21.920
<v Speaker 1>with the branch in my eye and and all the

1:08:21.960 --> 1:08:24.559
<v Speaker 1>people here. And I don't think that was true, but

1:08:24.640 --> 1:08:28.639
<v Speaker 1>it was a powerful sensation. I don't think I've ever

1:08:28.680 --> 1:08:32.200
<v Speaker 1>experienced that. I think I certainly have situations where I

1:08:32.240 --> 1:08:36.840
<v Speaker 1>certainly experienced deja vu, and I've certainly had dreams that

1:08:36.960 --> 1:08:41.559
<v Speaker 1>I either remember or misremember having had before. But I've

1:08:41.720 --> 1:08:44.160
<v Speaker 1>never I don't think I've ever experienced anything in life

1:08:44.160 --> 1:08:46.880
<v Speaker 1>and and felt like it was a reenactment of something

1:08:46.880 --> 1:08:48.800
<v Speaker 1>that occurred in a dream. I think that's something we

1:08:48.800 --> 1:08:51.160
<v Speaker 1>could definitely come back to. Thank you man anyway, and

1:08:51.520 --> 1:08:53.519
<v Speaker 1>says thank you for reading my email. I think this

1:08:53.560 --> 1:08:55.080
<v Speaker 1>would be a great topic to cover on the show.

1:08:55.160 --> 1:08:58.439
<v Speaker 1>Cheers to ten more years, and all right, it sounds good,

1:08:58.520 --> 1:09:01.360
<v Speaker 1>ten more, put it down for ten more. All these

1:09:01.439 --> 1:09:06.880
<v Speaker 1>people breaking my heart. Seriously, y'all out there are are

1:09:06.960 --> 1:09:08.720
<v Speaker 1>so kind to get in touch with us with these

1:09:08.760 --> 1:09:12.760
<v Speaker 1>words of encouragement, and uh it feels so nice, so

1:09:12.760 --> 1:09:16.200
<v Speaker 1>so thank you, Thank you the listener. Absolutely, and hopefully

1:09:16.320 --> 1:09:19.920
<v Speaker 1>in ten years, when Carney is the sole host of

1:09:19.960 --> 1:09:23.360
<v Speaker 1>the show, Carney will have us back on to to

1:09:23.479 --> 1:09:26.160
<v Speaker 1>reminisce about the old days. Occasionally he'll bring on our

1:09:26.280 --> 1:09:29.559
<v Speaker 1>jarred heads like in Futurama and we can argue with

1:09:29.880 --> 1:09:32.760
<v Speaker 1>the Richard Nixon head. I'm looking forward to les. Yeah,

1:09:32.800 --> 1:09:37.760
<v Speaker 1>that'll be good. All right, Well, like I said, we

1:09:37.800 --> 1:09:41.000
<v Speaker 1>receive a lot of listener mail and we we we

1:09:41.000 --> 1:09:43.200
<v Speaker 1>we generally read it all. We don't have time to

1:09:43.240 --> 1:09:44.680
<v Speaker 1>respond to it all, and we don't have time to

1:09:44.720 --> 1:09:47.960
<v Speaker 1>share it all here. But just you know, be assured

1:09:48.000 --> 1:09:50.719
<v Speaker 1>that if you send it in, our eyeballs will linger

1:09:50.840 --> 1:09:53.840
<v Speaker 1>over it. Uh. And you know, if you didn't know,

1:09:53.920 --> 1:09:55.760
<v Speaker 1>if you're stuff didn't get read today, maybe we'll fit

1:09:55.800 --> 1:09:57.880
<v Speaker 1>it in next time, because again we've just received so

1:09:57.960 --> 1:10:01.040
<v Speaker 1>much great content in meantime, if you want to check

1:10:01.040 --> 1:10:03.559
<v Speaker 1>out other episodes of stuff to blow your mind, perhaps

1:10:03.640 --> 1:10:05.920
<v Speaker 1>you heard reference to an episode that you haven't listened

1:10:05.920 --> 1:10:08.280
<v Speaker 1>to yet, Well you can go back and find it

1:10:08.520 --> 1:10:10.240
<v Speaker 1>where you can. Where can you find the show. You

1:10:10.280 --> 1:10:13.320
<v Speaker 1>can find the show anywhere you get your podcasts, wherever

1:10:13.360 --> 1:10:16.240
<v Speaker 1>that happens to be. Just help us out by subscribing,

1:10:17.080 --> 1:10:19.160
<v Speaker 1>by rating, and by reviewing. Those are the things you

1:10:19.200 --> 1:10:21.120
<v Speaker 1>can do that help out the show in the long run,

1:10:21.439 --> 1:10:23.840
<v Speaker 1>and certainly right in because we would love to hear

1:10:23.880 --> 1:10:26.639
<v Speaker 1>from you. Huge thanks as always to our excellent audio

1:10:26.680 --> 1:10:29.200
<v Speaker 1>producer Seth Nicholas Johnson. If you would like to get

1:10:29.240 --> 1:10:31.280
<v Speaker 1>in touch with us with feedback on this episode or

1:10:31.320 --> 1:10:33.720
<v Speaker 1>any other to suggest topic for the future, just to

1:10:33.720 --> 1:10:37.000
<v Speaker 1>say hello. You can email us at contact at stuff

1:10:37.040 --> 1:10:46.599
<v Speaker 1>to Blow your Mind dot com. Stuff to Blow your

1:10:46.600 --> 1:10:48.800
<v Speaker 1>Mind is a production of iHeart Radios. How stuff works.

1:10:48.960 --> 1:10:51.120
<v Speaker 1>For more podcasts from my Heart Radio is the iHeart

1:10:51.160 --> 1:10:53.800
<v Speaker 1>Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your

1:10:53.840 --> 1:11:10.440
<v Speaker 1>favorite shows. Biddy Present point four point Far Far