WEBVTT - Brian Silva

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:03.040
<v Speaker 1>Welcome back to another edition of the Frida Egg podcast,

0:00:03.680 --> 0:00:05.320
<v Speaker 1>this one with Brian Silva.

0:00:05.519 --> 0:00:09.039
<v Speaker 2>We did a little differently, started having a conversation and

0:00:09.400 --> 0:00:13.560
<v Speaker 2>it just worked, so don't have that normal intro that

0:00:13.600 --> 0:00:16.640
<v Speaker 2>we had at most of our podcasts.

0:00:17.160 --> 0:00:22.120
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening, and if you haven't already, please subscribe

0:00:22.120 --> 0:00:25.280
<v Speaker 1>to us. Rate us in the iTunes app store. It

0:00:25.320 --> 0:00:29.480
<v Speaker 1>really helps us out, gets more eyeballs on the on

0:00:29.520 --> 0:00:33.560
<v Speaker 1>the podcast. And if you haven't, please subscribe to the

0:00:33.600 --> 0:00:36.959
<v Speaker 1>Friday Egg newsletter. It's sent every Monday, Wednesday and Friday.

0:00:37.080 --> 0:00:39.239
<v Speaker 2>It's the easiest way to stay up to date with

0:00:39.520 --> 0:00:42.440
<v Speaker 2>golf and everything that's going on.

0:00:42.960 --> 0:00:47.120
<v Speaker 1>So thanks again, and without further ado, here is Brian Silva.

0:00:47.240 --> 0:00:50.000
<v Speaker 2>I miss a green, for example, I'm already upset when

0:00:50.000 --> 0:00:52.120
<v Speaker 2>I find my ball in the bunker, I'm really upset.

0:00:52.200 --> 0:00:53.080
<v Speaker 2>And when I find my.

0:00:53.040 --> 0:00:58.080
<v Speaker 3>Ball in a brid egg Frida Egg, Frida Egrida, Frida

0:00:58.360 --> 0:01:36.360
<v Speaker 3>bride Egg Lie, I'm about ready to on off of the.

0:01:26.520 --> 0:01:29.840
<v Speaker 2>I've been out at the Western m this week, which

0:01:29.880 --> 0:01:36.440
<v Speaker 2>is at Skokie Country Club. I mean, unbelievable set of greens,

0:01:36.480 --> 0:01:39.200
<v Speaker 2>and you know they have this one that has this

0:01:39.480 --> 0:01:42.000
<v Speaker 2>massive false front. They have a couple with them that.

0:01:42.520 --> 0:01:46.640
<v Speaker 2>But you know this, this guy is complaining. I was

0:01:46.840 --> 0:01:49.880
<v Speaker 2>with my buddy in a practice round and this guy's complaining.

0:01:49.920 --> 0:01:52.240
<v Speaker 2>He's like, I don't understand why this is all green here.

0:01:52.280 --> 0:01:54.320
<v Speaker 2>It's not like they can put a pin there. And

0:01:54.400 --> 0:01:57.080
<v Speaker 2>I'm like, well, that's why your ball will roll twenty

0:01:57.160 --> 0:02:01.400
<v Speaker 2>yards down the hill. You know, it's makes the whole green.

0:02:01.800 --> 0:02:05.520
<v Speaker 4>You know, it's hard for people to appreciate that the green,

0:02:06.360 --> 0:02:09.200
<v Speaker 4>under the best circumstances is part of the hazard on

0:02:09.240 --> 0:02:15.200
<v Speaker 4>a hole. And it's better that you hear things like

0:02:15.240 --> 0:02:20.160
<v Speaker 4>that than I do, because I don't hide my visual

0:02:20.400 --> 0:02:25.640
<v Speaker 4>reaction when some knucklehead says something like that. You know,

0:02:26.280 --> 0:02:30.040
<v Speaker 4>all they're trying to do is make every golf course

0:02:30.080 --> 0:02:34.280
<v Speaker 4>in America like every other golf course in America and

0:02:34.400 --> 0:02:40.720
<v Speaker 4>kind of homogenize vanilla eyes it down to the least interesting,

0:02:41.440 --> 0:02:48.720
<v Speaker 4>most standard, least unexciting thing. It's unbelievable. It's such an

0:02:48.720 --> 0:02:52.280
<v Speaker 4>incredible double standard. You know, of course has a really unique,

0:02:52.360 --> 0:02:57.079
<v Speaker 4>beautiful clubhouse. Those people would who want to just dummy

0:02:57.160 --> 0:02:59.760
<v Speaker 4>down their golf course and make it look like every

0:02:59.800 --> 0:03:04.440
<v Speaker 4>other golf course would never say, you know, our clubhouse,

0:03:05.639 --> 0:03:10.040
<v Speaker 4>it's really too unique. We really need to tear it

0:03:10.120 --> 0:03:13.240
<v Speaker 4>down and like put up a metal butler building. Oh

0:03:13.280 --> 0:03:16.519
<v Speaker 4>and then they'll say a metal a butler building. That's

0:03:16.560 --> 0:03:20.359
<v Speaker 4>easier to maintain because everything that gets done. I say

0:03:20.360 --> 0:03:25.880
<v Speaker 4>to people sadly, when we do a project, there's maybe

0:03:26.000 --> 0:03:31.600
<v Speaker 4>ten items of interest that we're that that everyone's talking

0:03:31.600 --> 0:03:36.920
<v Speaker 4>about keeping in mind throughout the entire project. And you know,

0:03:37.040 --> 0:03:39.760
<v Speaker 4>bullet points or whatever you want to call them. One

0:03:39.840 --> 0:03:41.920
<v Speaker 4>is the most important. It's the one that gets talked

0:03:41.960 --> 0:03:45.440
<v Speaker 4>about the most, and ten is the least important, the

0:03:45.480 --> 0:03:48.120
<v Speaker 4>one that gets talked about with the least I swear

0:03:48.760 --> 0:03:53.400
<v Speaker 4>more often than not, characteristics of golf course design find

0:03:53.440 --> 0:03:59.760
<v Speaker 4>themselves largely lodged in number ten. It's a she's how

0:03:59.760 --> 0:04:03.560
<v Speaker 4>do we get the cart paths around? And you know,

0:04:04.080 --> 0:04:06.800
<v Speaker 4>I hit a perfect I hit a perfect shot to

0:04:06.840 --> 0:04:10.040
<v Speaker 4>this green, but because of this false front that shouldn't

0:04:10.040 --> 0:04:12.920
<v Speaker 4>even be green, I ended up twenty yards back in

0:04:12.960 --> 0:04:18.640
<v Speaker 4>the fair way. That's not fair. So it's fascinating, and

0:04:18.839 --> 0:04:22.599
<v Speaker 4>all it proves, Andy, don't take this personally, is guys

0:04:22.680 --> 0:04:26.480
<v Speaker 4>like you and me haven't done a good enough job educating. Yeah,

0:04:26.839 --> 0:04:30.120
<v Speaker 4>I know, I agree, you know what I mean it's

0:04:30.200 --> 0:04:36.600
<v Speaker 4>just and unfortunately we're swimming against the tide because more

0:04:36.640 --> 0:04:40.359
<v Speaker 4>often than not, when a new course gets well, they

0:04:40.360 --> 0:04:43.880
<v Speaker 4>don't get built anymore. But when work gets done, it

0:04:44.040 --> 0:04:48.320
<v Speaker 4>really you would think their goal was to take the

0:04:48.440 --> 0:04:53.800
<v Speaker 4>character out of the course, to you know, take the

0:04:53.920 --> 0:04:58.000
<v Speaker 4>unique features out of the course. It's unfortunate. Now, don't

0:04:58.000 --> 0:05:01.480
<v Speaker 4>get me wrong, I think this the swell work going

0:05:01.520 --> 0:05:07.279
<v Speaker 4>on out there, but there still was this in ertia

0:05:07.960 --> 0:05:10.320
<v Speaker 4>to make every golf course look like it was built

0:05:10.360 --> 0:05:14.920
<v Speaker 4>in the nineteen sixties. And that's unfortunate.

0:05:15.720 --> 0:05:19.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, it's the it's really interesting. I mean

0:05:20.040 --> 0:05:24.040
<v Speaker 2>I watched this kid, Cameron Jamp yesterday play and he's

0:05:24.080 --> 0:05:27.240
<v Speaker 2>like one of the longest guys on you know, he'd

0:05:27.240 --> 0:05:29.760
<v Speaker 2>be the longest guy on tour. He's a college kid.

0:05:29.800 --> 0:05:32.640
<v Speaker 2>He kills it. And he played this four hundred yard hole.

0:05:32.760 --> 0:05:35.000
<v Speaker 2>The pin was way up front on the right side

0:05:35.240 --> 0:05:37.919
<v Speaker 2>and he hit driver up to like thirty yards and

0:05:37.960 --> 0:05:42.600
<v Speaker 2>he was absolutely dead because you know, the way the

0:05:42.600 --> 0:05:45.120
<v Speaker 2>green was, and this is a green that would never

0:05:45.240 --> 0:05:46.479
<v Speaker 2>be built by.

0:05:46.640 --> 0:05:48.599
<v Speaker 4>Today, right, and the way.

0:05:48.480 --> 0:05:50.719
<v Speaker 2>The green was. He had a knob in front of

0:05:50.760 --> 0:05:53.159
<v Speaker 2>this front pin and a knob behind it, and he

0:05:53.200 --> 0:05:56.200
<v Speaker 2>had nothing. He couldn't do anything, and it's like, okay,

0:05:56.240 --> 0:05:58.640
<v Speaker 2>like that was a really bad play, Like you need

0:05:58.680 --> 0:06:01.360
<v Speaker 2>to have a full shot going into that green right right,

0:06:01.400 --> 0:06:04.599
<v Speaker 2>And people are you know, how do you defend distance?

0:06:04.600 --> 0:06:07.919
<v Speaker 2>How do you but like great green complexes defend well,

0:06:08.000 --> 0:06:11.560
<v Speaker 2>because then you have to play angles and you have

0:06:11.640 --> 0:06:14.080
<v Speaker 2>to have a strategy going into the hole rather than

0:06:14.240 --> 0:06:17.320
<v Speaker 2>just you know, pull out driver and bludge in the course.

0:06:17.400 --> 0:06:18.800
<v Speaker 2>And that's what I think those are.

0:06:19.440 --> 0:06:23.440
<v Speaker 4>Those are outlandish thoughts, Andy, that you'd actually think on

0:06:23.520 --> 0:06:26.760
<v Speaker 4>the tee where you want to be the best access

0:06:26.800 --> 0:06:29.880
<v Speaker 4>to the green, You're you're going in the wrong direction,

0:06:29.960 --> 0:06:35.039
<v Speaker 4>big guy. You know, it's all power golf. It's very sad.

0:06:36.200 --> 0:06:38.480
<v Speaker 2>I sense a hint of sarcasm.

0:06:39.279 --> 0:06:41.960
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I mean I see why a lot of people

0:06:41.960 --> 0:06:51.440
<v Speaker 4>are like that. And uh, because if you put a

0:06:51.839 --> 0:06:55.080
<v Speaker 4>if you put a percentage on the number of courses

0:06:55.800 --> 0:06:59.520
<v Speaker 4>in the United States that don't require that thought, that

0:06:59.600 --> 0:07:02.640
<v Speaker 4>don't have of the angles, that don't have the strategy,

0:07:03.120 --> 0:07:09.040
<v Speaker 4>that don't have multiple roots, I'm afraid that percentage would

0:07:09.040 --> 0:07:14.080
<v Speaker 4>be above ninety percent. And so they're not used. They've

0:07:14.120 --> 0:07:17.520
<v Speaker 4>never seen it before, and when they see it, they

0:07:17.560 --> 0:07:21.240
<v Speaker 4>find it odd because they don't see it. It's you know,

0:07:21.320 --> 0:07:24.760
<v Speaker 4>I can't do a project without trying to force a

0:07:24.800 --> 0:07:29.280
<v Speaker 4>stupid punch bowl green in on it. And people say, well,

0:07:29.320 --> 0:07:32.920
<v Speaker 4>what the fuck is that, because well it's a punch

0:07:32.960 --> 0:07:36.880
<v Speaker 4>bowl green. Have you other been to Scotland? Every course

0:07:36.960 --> 0:07:39.760
<v Speaker 4>kind of has one, and there were these two knuckleheads

0:07:39.800 --> 0:07:42.640
<v Speaker 4>named MacDonald and Rayner who used to do them. And

0:07:42.680 --> 0:07:44.920
<v Speaker 4>these are the names of the courses. You know they've

0:07:44.920 --> 0:07:47.760
<v Speaker 4>done them on. Oh, I've heard of those courses. So

0:07:47.880 --> 0:07:52.120
<v Speaker 4>it's it's interesting crafts.

0:07:53.440 --> 0:07:56.040
<v Speaker 2>How did you get into golf course architecture?

0:07:58.400 --> 0:08:03.960
<v Speaker 4>My dad was in light construction. Well, he started out

0:08:04.000 --> 0:08:07.680
<v Speaker 4>working for a big company a JF. White that built

0:08:07.680 --> 0:08:10.520
<v Speaker 4>part of Logan Airport. He ran a bulldozer. He did

0:08:10.520 --> 0:08:13.960
<v Speaker 4>the Masspike extension into Boston. But then in the early

0:08:14.080 --> 0:08:18.160
<v Speaker 4>sixties and Andy, no answers are short with me, so

0:08:18.240 --> 0:08:19.160
<v Speaker 4>just tell me to shut up.

0:08:20.200 --> 0:08:23.440
<v Speaker 2>You Yeah, you've heard enough. The beauty of this format

0:08:23.560 --> 0:08:26.119
<v Speaker 2>is you can just talk and we and it's great.

0:08:26.200 --> 0:08:27.320
<v Speaker 2>It's just a conversation.

0:08:28.440 --> 0:08:31.400
<v Speaker 4>But my dad, I had a little bit of a

0:08:31.440 --> 0:08:35.559
<v Speaker 4>reputation as a bulldozer operator and I grew up in Framingham, Massachusetts,

0:08:35.920 --> 0:08:39.320
<v Speaker 4>and oddly enough, there was a guy in Framingham, Massachusetts,

0:08:39.640 --> 0:08:43.920
<v Speaker 4>who built, who was in a construction company that built

0:08:43.960 --> 0:08:48.840
<v Speaker 4>golf courses and playing fields, so he needed a guy

0:08:48.920 --> 0:08:52.720
<v Speaker 4>to shape greens and teas and bunkers in the early sixties.

0:08:52.720 --> 0:08:54.680
<v Speaker 4>And he said to my dad, Hey, why don't you

0:08:54.720 --> 0:08:57.880
<v Speaker 4>come try working with us for a week and we

0:08:57.960 --> 0:09:01.720
<v Speaker 4>can see how it goes. And after a week, Bob

0:09:01.800 --> 0:09:04.800
<v Speaker 4>Drake said to my father, you are the only guy

0:09:04.840 --> 0:09:07.280
<v Speaker 4>who's going to do stuff for me. By that time,

0:09:07.360 --> 0:09:10.840
<v Speaker 4>my dad and another guy from Framingham had started a

0:09:10.840 --> 0:09:13.960
<v Speaker 4>small construction company, just two guys. They had a couple

0:09:14.000 --> 0:09:18.880
<v Speaker 4>bulldozed as a couple back hoes, and for the spring, summer,

0:09:18.920 --> 0:09:24.960
<v Speaker 4>and fall, for the next eighteen or twenty years, that's

0:09:24.960 --> 0:09:28.120
<v Speaker 4>what my dad did. He worked. He did shaping for

0:09:28.440 --> 0:09:32.920
<v Speaker 4>this guy named Bob Drake, some new courses, but mostly renovation,

0:09:33.040 --> 0:09:35.840
<v Speaker 4>do existing courses. And that's what I wanted to do.

0:09:35.920 --> 0:09:39.440
<v Speaker 4>But you know, my dad, he worked on the machine

0:09:39.960 --> 0:09:42.160
<v Speaker 4>six days a week and then on Sunday he was

0:09:42.160 --> 0:09:46.040
<v Speaker 4>his own mechanic. He'd do repairs and maintenance. And he

0:09:46.040 --> 0:09:50.839
<v Speaker 4>didn't want me doing that. So ever since I found out,

0:09:50.880 --> 0:09:53.920
<v Speaker 4>I wouldn't make it in the National Hockey League, which

0:09:53.960 --> 0:09:55.760
<v Speaker 4>I found out when I was thirteen, and I went

0:09:55.800 --> 0:09:58.199
<v Speaker 4>to a summer hockey school with kids all from all

0:09:58.240 --> 0:10:01.079
<v Speaker 4>over Canada in the United States, and it took me

0:10:01.120 --> 0:10:03.120
<v Speaker 4>about ten minutes to realize I'd never make it in

0:10:03.160 --> 0:10:07.760
<v Speaker 4>the NHL. I decided I wanted to be a golf

0:10:07.800 --> 0:10:11.240
<v Speaker 4>course architect, and my dad worked on a lot of

0:10:11.320 --> 0:10:14.440
<v Speaker 4>Jeffrey Cornish projects, who Jeff did a lot of work

0:10:14.480 --> 0:10:18.360
<v Speaker 4>in New England. And when I was in high school,

0:10:18.480 --> 0:10:21.080
<v Speaker 4>I met Mster Cornish and said, what should a kid

0:10:21.120 --> 0:10:23.760
<v Speaker 4>do who wants to be a golf course architect? And

0:10:23.840 --> 0:10:25.680
<v Speaker 4>Jeff said, well, you should go to turf school for

0:10:25.720 --> 0:10:28.240
<v Speaker 4>two years and then you should get your bachelor's in

0:10:28.320 --> 0:10:31.800
<v Speaker 4>landscape architecture, and you should work on golf courses during

0:10:31.840 --> 0:10:35.160
<v Speaker 4>the summer. And that was in those heady days when

0:10:35.160 --> 0:10:37.880
<v Speaker 4>I actually listened to what people told me. So that's

0:10:37.920 --> 0:10:42.640
<v Speaker 4>what I did, and when I was at then I

0:10:42.679 --> 0:10:46.120
<v Speaker 4>went to graduate school in plant so Sciences, and when

0:10:46.120 --> 0:10:49.640
<v Speaker 4>I was there, I taught a professor left right at

0:10:49.640 --> 0:10:52.840
<v Speaker 4>the last minute before a fall semester started, so I

0:10:52.920 --> 0:10:57.000
<v Speaker 4>taught a couple courses each semester in turf. I liked

0:10:57.000 --> 0:10:59.320
<v Speaker 4>that a lot. I went down to Lake City Community

0:10:59.360 --> 0:11:01.439
<v Speaker 4>College where they used to have a two year program

0:11:01.480 --> 0:11:04.760
<v Speaker 4>that trained superintendents. I taught there for three years, and

0:11:04.960 --> 0:11:07.400
<v Speaker 4>I wanted to get back to New England. I worked

0:11:07.400 --> 0:11:10.920
<v Speaker 4>for the USGA Green Section, you know, the agronomous staff,

0:11:11.400 --> 0:11:14.760
<v Speaker 4>visiting golf courses, and then one day mister Cornish and

0:11:14.840 --> 0:11:17.640
<v Speaker 4>I just happened to be visiting the same golf course

0:11:17.679 --> 0:11:20.559
<v Speaker 4>on the same day. We were walking it and all

0:11:20.600 --> 0:11:23.440
<v Speaker 4>the committee people were in carts, and when they went

0:11:23.440 --> 0:11:25.400
<v Speaker 4>to get the carts and we were walking down a hole,

0:11:25.480 --> 0:11:27.559
<v Speaker 4>Jeff turned to me and said, you know, I think

0:11:27.559 --> 0:11:32.520
<v Speaker 4>it's time you got involved in golf course design. Why

0:11:32.520 --> 0:11:35.520
<v Speaker 4>don't you come work with me and then I'll retire

0:11:35.600 --> 0:11:39.960
<v Speaker 4>after a few years, and and you can just run

0:11:40.040 --> 0:11:44.040
<v Speaker 4>with the ball and you know, like some wet behind

0:11:44.160 --> 0:11:46.560
<v Speaker 4>the is kind of guy. And myself, well, Jeff, Jeff,

0:11:46.640 --> 0:11:48.000
<v Speaker 4>let me think about it for a week. I mean

0:11:48.080 --> 0:11:50.920
<v Speaker 4>the minute he said that, I knew what was happening.

0:11:50.960 --> 0:11:53.520
<v Speaker 2>So a week later you played You played it cool, though,

0:11:53.720 --> 0:11:56.400
<v Speaker 2>and you're like, oh, let me think about my actions.

0:11:56.880 --> 0:11:58.920
<v Speaker 4>No, the only the only thing that was obvious is

0:11:58.920 --> 0:12:04.199
<v Speaker 4>I immediately went my hands. But you know, I called

0:12:04.280 --> 0:12:05.559
<v Speaker 4>him back and said, I want to do that, and

0:12:05.600 --> 0:12:07.280
<v Speaker 4>he said, Okay, this is how we're going to do it.

0:12:07.720 --> 0:12:09.720
<v Speaker 4>I want you to work for the United States Golf

0:12:09.720 --> 0:12:12.240
<v Speaker 4>Association for five more years. You've only worked there for

0:12:12.320 --> 0:12:16.000
<v Speaker 4>two years. And I just said, Jeff, I cannot do

0:12:16.200 --> 0:12:20.600
<v Speaker 4>I cannot know that this is going to happen. Sort

0:12:20.640 --> 0:12:26.520
<v Speaker 4>of my dream. I said, you're a wicked, awesome, nice gentleman.

0:12:26.600 --> 0:12:31.040
<v Speaker 4>I said, could let me just finish this season and

0:12:31.640 --> 0:12:35.400
<v Speaker 4>next winter I'll come on with you. And so in

0:12:35.440 --> 0:12:37.679
<v Speaker 4>February of eighty three, I went on with Jeff. And

0:12:37.720 --> 0:12:41.080
<v Speaker 4>so that's kind of the way I got my start.

0:12:41.160 --> 0:12:47.200
<v Speaker 4>You know, if you're not Jack Nicholas or or someone

0:12:47.360 --> 0:12:51.440
<v Speaker 4>like that, it's still very much like the European system

0:12:51.480 --> 0:12:55.320
<v Speaker 4>of an apprentice occupation. And if you know what I mean,

0:12:57.520 --> 0:13:01.080
<v Speaker 4>the Brian Silvers of the world don't just put a

0:13:01.120 --> 0:13:03.480
<v Speaker 4>shingle out and say hey, I'm a golf course architect

0:13:03.800 --> 0:13:07.480
<v Speaker 4>and then get jobs. And it's appropriate that they should

0:13:07.600 --> 0:13:12.760
<v Speaker 4>learn and train under somebody who's really well experienced. So

0:13:13.440 --> 0:13:16.680
<v Speaker 4>I was lucky, you know, when things were moving and

0:13:16.720 --> 0:13:19.720
<v Speaker 4>grooving in the eighties and the nineties and the early

0:13:19.760 --> 0:13:24.520
<v Speaker 4>two thousands. I would say that Jeff and I got

0:13:25.520 --> 0:13:28.640
<v Speaker 4>at least one hundred resumes a year from kids in

0:13:28.720 --> 0:13:34.720
<v Speaker 4>turf school, from kids from landscape architecture school, from fifty

0:13:34.800 --> 0:13:36.520
<v Speaker 4>year old guys who wanted to get out of the

0:13:36.520 --> 0:13:40.760
<v Speaker 4>financial business who wanted to become golf architects and wanted

0:13:40.760 --> 0:13:43.280
<v Speaker 4>to know how to do that. And out of all

0:13:43.360 --> 0:13:46.480
<v Speaker 4>those people, not many get a chance. And I was

0:13:46.559 --> 0:13:52.120
<v Speaker 4>just unbelievably fortunate to get a chance, because in all honesty,

0:13:53.520 --> 0:13:56.320
<v Speaker 4>I still get things where they send me, you know,

0:13:56.640 --> 0:14:00.680
<v Speaker 4>full sized plans of these imaginary golf courses. They do

0:14:00.840 --> 0:14:06.440
<v Speaker 4>grading plans, and I just say to myself, Wow, my

0:14:06.520 --> 0:14:09.440
<v Speaker 4>stuff isn't half as good as this, And you know

0:14:09.480 --> 0:14:11.760
<v Speaker 4>they tried to get in. So I was just real lucky.

0:14:12.120 --> 0:14:15.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean a lot of times it's an opportunity

0:14:15.440 --> 0:14:18.120
<v Speaker 2>and you know, hard work and are set and he

0:14:18.679 --> 0:14:22.840
<v Speaker 2>got a kind of the good start there. I mean it,

0:14:23.040 --> 0:14:27.160
<v Speaker 2>it's interesting I look at the landscape of the architecture world,

0:14:27.200 --> 0:14:31.240
<v Speaker 2>and especially with you know, the economic slowdown. Now you

0:14:31.360 --> 0:14:36.840
<v Speaker 2>have this marketplace where there aren't enough jobs for how

0:14:36.840 --> 0:14:41.080
<v Speaker 2>many talented like associates that work for guys like Core

0:14:41.160 --> 0:14:44.120
<v Speaker 2>and Crenshaw and Dope. And you know, if you look

0:14:44.200 --> 0:14:46.440
<v Speaker 2>back to the eighties and nineties, those guys would be,

0:14:46.760 --> 0:14:48.680
<v Speaker 2>you know, have their own architecture firms.

0:14:48.680 --> 0:14:52.480
<v Speaker 4>Now, do you think I We had a couple of

0:14:52.560 --> 0:14:55.160
<v Speaker 4>young guys who work for us in the office and

0:14:55.240 --> 0:14:58.040
<v Speaker 4>one of them named Brian Johnson. His father was a

0:14:58.040 --> 0:15:01.680
<v Speaker 4>golf pro. So Brian's been doodling golf hole since he

0:15:01.800 --> 0:15:05.080
<v Speaker 4>was about six. He had to get out of it

0:15:05.200 --> 0:15:09.080
<v Speaker 4>because there was no work. He's got a management company

0:15:09.160 --> 0:15:13.160
<v Speaker 4>now in Houston, Texas, and he manages a golf course.

0:15:13.480 --> 0:15:17.240
<v Speaker 4>For a guy, I'm going to tell you something, if

0:15:17.280 --> 0:15:22.160
<v Speaker 4>he ever got a chance, he would blow everyone in

0:15:22.200 --> 0:15:26.320
<v Speaker 4>the industry away. He does my drafting now, So I

0:15:26.400 --> 0:15:32.880
<v Speaker 4>still get he's unbelievably talented and imaginative. I still get

0:15:32.920 --> 0:15:37.120
<v Speaker 4>the benefit of his imagination. But it's really sad that

0:15:37.160 --> 0:15:40.480
<v Speaker 4>a kid like Brian who wants it as much as

0:15:40.520 --> 0:15:45.440
<v Speaker 4>anyone I've ever known, and who is more talented than

0:15:45.440 --> 0:15:50.560
<v Speaker 4>anyone I've ever known, the multiple roots he thinks about it, Oh,

0:15:50.640 --> 0:15:55.840
<v Speaker 4>Chie's and the strategy and the angles is just incredible.

0:15:56.280 --> 0:16:01.360
<v Speaker 4>It's too bad it is, And it's no fault. It's

0:16:01.360 --> 0:16:05.080
<v Speaker 4>through no fault to theirs. You know, this is the truth.

0:16:06.000 --> 0:16:13.680
<v Speaker 4>I got to do some work, not insignificantly, just by

0:16:14.200 --> 0:16:20.040
<v Speaker 4>lucky timing. Yeah, you know, nobody likes to say stuff

0:16:20.080 --> 0:16:23.960
<v Speaker 4>like that, but that's the truth. You know. Being born

0:16:24.080 --> 0:16:27.520
<v Speaker 4>when I was and getting into the work when I was,

0:16:28.960 --> 0:16:32.240
<v Speaker 4>there were ups and downs, you know, but nothing like

0:16:32.320 --> 0:16:35.280
<v Speaker 4>it is now in terms of new courses. I really

0:16:35.320 --> 0:16:38.760
<v Speaker 4>lived through a twenty five year boom. And that's why,

0:16:39.280 --> 0:16:42.000
<v Speaker 4>you know, when I see guys now and they bemoan

0:16:42.560 --> 0:16:48.640
<v Speaker 4>how quiet it is. I don't want to say the

0:16:48.680 --> 0:16:52.520
<v Speaker 4>wrong thing, but there are times when I'll say, well,

0:16:52.520 --> 0:16:56.760
<v Speaker 4>don't you think when we were all building three hundred

0:16:56.800 --> 0:17:00.720
<v Speaker 4>brand new courses a year that that was maybe as

0:17:01.720 --> 0:17:05.560
<v Speaker 4>ridiculous on one side of the equation as just building

0:17:05.640 --> 0:17:08.920
<v Speaker 4>five new courses a year. But you know what happens, dandy.

0:17:09.280 --> 0:17:11.080
<v Speaker 4>You know, when you're in the heat of the battle

0:17:11.520 --> 0:17:14.000
<v Speaker 4>and that many courses are getting built and it goes

0:17:14.040 --> 0:17:18.440
<v Speaker 4>on for a couple decades or more, it's easy to think, well,

0:17:18.480 --> 0:17:21.639
<v Speaker 4>this is the way it is, and you know it

0:17:24.200 --> 0:17:26.000
<v Speaker 4>in one way it was the way it is. In

0:17:26.040 --> 0:17:28.520
<v Speaker 4>another way, it definitely was not the way it is.

0:17:28.800 --> 0:17:35.800
<v Speaker 4>And so if you live through that and you're complaining. Now,

0:17:37.240 --> 0:17:40.720
<v Speaker 4>I just don't know that you're taking a very realistic viewpoint.

0:17:40.520 --> 0:17:47.840
<v Speaker 4>But like Brian Johnson, I feel bad for these talented

0:17:48.520 --> 0:17:54.399
<v Speaker 4>guys and gals who just can't get their chance. It

0:17:56.880 --> 0:18:02.560
<v Speaker 4>further proves to me how fortunate a knucklehead like myself,

0:18:02.640 --> 0:18:04.719
<v Speaker 4>how how fortunate I was.

0:18:05.920 --> 0:18:09.240
<v Speaker 2>I don't know, it's it's like that old I think

0:18:09.240 --> 0:18:11.400
<v Speaker 2>it was the player saying, you know, the more you work,

0:18:11.480 --> 0:18:13.560
<v Speaker 2>the luckier you get, and sounds like you put in

0:18:13.640 --> 0:18:14.520
<v Speaker 2>a lot of hard work.

0:18:14.640 --> 0:18:17.199
<v Speaker 4>So oh no, no, no, I did. But but you

0:18:17.280 --> 0:18:21.520
<v Speaker 4>know what Andy and I did. I worked. I believe

0:18:21.560 --> 0:18:23.480
<v Speaker 4>I worked as hard as anyone. When I used to

0:18:23.560 --> 0:18:27.960
<v Speaker 4>go to the Architects Society meetings and I talked, you know,

0:18:28.040 --> 0:18:30.160
<v Speaker 4>after dinner with guys, what are you doing? Then there's

0:18:30.200 --> 0:18:33.840
<v Speaker 4>this They would just the volume of work would would

0:18:33.960 --> 0:18:37.800
<v Speaker 4>stun them a little bit. But you still can't. And

0:18:37.840 --> 0:18:39.160
<v Speaker 4>my wife says the same thing, Oh.

0:18:39.080 --> 0:18:41.679
<v Speaker 5>Any you actually had you you left on money and

0:18:41.680 --> 0:18:44.520
<v Speaker 5>you didn't come back till Saturday, all while Ananda was

0:18:44.560 --> 0:18:46.960
<v Speaker 5>growing up. You worked hard, And I said, yeah, but

0:18:47.640 --> 0:18:50.960
<v Speaker 5>you cannot get away from the fact that I had

0:18:51.119 --> 0:18:58.119
<v Speaker 5>the chance most you know, it's a small profession. A

0:18:58.160 --> 0:19:02.840
<v Speaker 5>lot of people never had a chance. So I realize

0:19:03.680 --> 0:19:07.840
<v Speaker 5>how fortunate I was. I when it's busy, you can

0:19:07.880 --> 0:19:11.280
<v Speaker 5>sometimes forget that, you can forget how full today I

0:19:11.320 --> 0:19:15.200
<v Speaker 5>got it going on. But again I think seeing Brian

0:19:15.280 --> 0:19:18.479
<v Speaker 5>Johnson such a great he's a great kid, really good player.

0:19:19.200 --> 0:19:22.439
<v Speaker 5>And I had him up and we played golf for

0:19:23.000 --> 0:19:25.960
<v Speaker 5>a few days in May. And I got up one

0:19:26.000 --> 0:19:30.280
<v Speaker 5>morning and on my desk was a couple of eight

0:19:30.320 --> 0:19:32.359
<v Speaker 5>and a half by eleven sheets of papers of golf

0:19:32.400 --> 0:19:35.640
<v Speaker 5>holes he designed over the night while he couldn't sleep.

0:19:36.240 --> 0:19:37.720
<v Speaker 5>And when and I got up, I saw him and

0:19:37.720 --> 0:19:39.840
<v Speaker 5>he was already up, and he says, Brian, I really

0:19:39.840 --> 0:19:40.919
<v Speaker 5>want to I really want to.

0:19:40.920 --> 0:19:42.720
<v Speaker 4>Get back in this. And I said, I know you do, Bry,

0:19:43.240 --> 0:19:45.120
<v Speaker 4>but but I said, you know, you have a really

0:19:45.160 --> 0:19:48.000
<v Speaker 4>good job right now. It's probably paying you more than

0:19:48.040 --> 0:19:51.359
<v Speaker 4>you could do if you could just scratch out a

0:19:51.480 --> 0:19:55.879
<v Speaker 4>job in somebody's office. And I know, you know, he

0:19:55.920 --> 0:19:58.680
<v Speaker 4>wants me to get busy enough to have to need

0:19:59.080 --> 0:20:01.000
<v Speaker 4>full time help, and I'm not sure that will ever

0:20:01.040 --> 0:20:07.159
<v Speaker 4>happen again. Yeah, being home during the recession, uh, you know,

0:20:07.200 --> 0:20:09.639
<v Speaker 4>being home more than two nights a week was a

0:20:09.680 --> 0:20:13.960
<v Speaker 4>real eye opening experience for me. I enjoyed it more

0:20:13.960 --> 0:20:15.440
<v Speaker 4>than I could have ever imagined.

0:20:16.040 --> 0:20:20.920
<v Speaker 2>Mhm. So you know you've started, You've done a lot

0:20:20.920 --> 0:20:25.040
<v Speaker 2>of restorations too, and I'd love to talk a little

0:20:25.040 --> 0:20:27.920
<v Speaker 2>bit about kind of the golden h architects that you've

0:20:28.040 --> 0:20:32.600
<v Speaker 2>encountered and kind of learned from, and who you consider

0:20:32.680 --> 0:20:35.040
<v Speaker 2>your biggest influences and why.

0:20:37.400 --> 0:20:46.720
<v Speaker 4>Well I I I got to go modern first, Andy,

0:20:48.840 --> 0:20:55.480
<v Speaker 4>because early on in my life, when I was teaching

0:20:55.520 --> 0:21:00.280
<v Speaker 4>at Lake City and see, during the summer when there

0:21:00.280 --> 0:21:03.560
<v Speaker 4>were no classes, my job was to drive around the

0:21:03.600 --> 0:21:11.639
<v Speaker 4>Southeast and visit courses where my students were working on

0:21:11.720 --> 0:21:18.560
<v Speaker 4>their summer on the job training thing. And I started

0:21:18.600 --> 0:21:23.440
<v Speaker 4>to you know, Harbor Town and Well and even Seminole,

0:21:23.520 --> 0:21:26.159
<v Speaker 4>which Pete didn't design, but he was a member of.

0:21:27.520 --> 0:21:32.399
<v Speaker 4>I started to think that his courses were a little

0:21:32.440 --> 0:21:38.480
<v Speaker 4>bit different than other people's courses. And it wasn't just

0:21:39.000 --> 0:21:44.399
<v Speaker 4>it was it was decidedly not the railroad ties or

0:21:45.080 --> 0:21:49.000
<v Speaker 4>pot bunkers or strip bunkers. There was something going on there,

0:21:49.720 --> 0:21:52.840
<v Speaker 4>and and that kind of planted a little thing in

0:21:52.880 --> 0:21:56.760
<v Speaker 4>my mind. I wish I had been bright enough to

0:21:56.880 --> 0:22:01.200
<v Speaker 4>fully understand it, and Then when I became a USJA

0:22:01.359 --> 0:22:06.600
<v Speaker 4>agronomist up in the Northeast, I saw lots of golf courses,

0:22:07.000 --> 0:22:10.879
<v Speaker 4>but I started to really like these McDonald and Rayner

0:22:11.000 --> 0:22:16.480
<v Speaker 4>golf courses. There was something going on there. I wasn't

0:22:16.560 --> 0:22:20.160
<v Speaker 4>quite sure what it was, but I knew they were

0:22:20.320 --> 0:22:24.240
<v Speaker 4>different and they were fun to play, but they were

0:22:24.280 --> 0:22:30.200
<v Speaker 4>still challenging. But I still was so stupid, I couldn't

0:22:30.720 --> 0:22:40.919
<v Speaker 4>really boil it down to its fundamentals. And I'm going

0:22:41.000 --> 0:22:44.520
<v Speaker 4>to tell you a story I never tell in public.

0:22:46.680 --> 0:22:49.280
<v Speaker 4>But we used to close the office the first week

0:22:49.320 --> 0:22:51.600
<v Speaker 4>in December, back when we had an office, and we'd

0:22:51.600 --> 0:22:55.000
<v Speaker 4>go out to Lakenta, California. I had friends who worked

0:22:55.000 --> 0:22:59.080
<v Speaker 4>for Landmark, and we would play like Ryder Cup matches

0:22:59.119 --> 0:23:01.879
<v Speaker 4>against them for a week. There had be four of

0:23:01.960 --> 0:23:05.520
<v Speaker 4>us against four of them, and we would play Lakinita Mountain,

0:23:06.000 --> 0:23:10.040
<v Speaker 4>Lakita Citrus, we'd play PGA West, we'd play the old

0:23:10.119 --> 0:23:13.719
<v Speaker 4>Dinah Shore, we'd play the New Dinah Shore. So it

0:23:14.080 --> 0:23:21.359
<v Speaker 4>was a Pete Dye extravaganza. And again I felt there

0:23:21.440 --> 0:23:24.600
<v Speaker 4>was something about his courses. And this is the truth,

0:23:24.640 --> 0:23:28.119
<v Speaker 4>and I'm a little embarrassed about this. One night after dinner,

0:23:28.160 --> 0:23:32.000
<v Speaker 4>I walked over to Lakinta Hotel. And this was in December,

0:23:32.359 --> 0:23:35.400
<v Speaker 4>about two weeks after they'd had the Skins game at

0:23:35.440 --> 0:23:39.320
<v Speaker 4>PGA West. Yea and I sat next to the fireplace,

0:23:39.359 --> 0:23:41.879
<v Speaker 4>and in a little wicker basket next to the fireplace

0:23:42.240 --> 0:23:46.159
<v Speaker 4>there were the program books that they sold during the

0:23:46.200 --> 0:23:51.760
<v Speaker 4>Skins game. Yeah, and I are you taping me? Andy?

0:23:51.840 --> 0:23:52.000
<v Speaker 2>Oh?

0:23:52.080 --> 0:23:57.359
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, okay, all right, then I won't use great expletives.

0:24:00.920 --> 0:24:07.359
<v Speaker 4>In this wicker basket was a program and I opened

0:24:07.359 --> 0:24:11.160
<v Speaker 4>it up and the centerfold. You know, only a guy

0:24:11.280 --> 0:24:15.520
<v Speaker 4>interested in design can go nuts about a centerfold, which

0:24:15.560 --> 0:24:20.360
<v Speaker 4>is an aerial photograph of PGA West, you know, and

0:24:20.400 --> 0:24:24.240
<v Speaker 4>when you look down on it from the sky, immediately

0:24:25.280 --> 0:24:33.879
<v Speaker 4>I said, oh, holy crap, it's all about angles. I

0:24:33.960 --> 0:24:38.120
<v Speaker 4>could see the angles that Pete had put in, how

0:24:38.160 --> 0:24:41.360
<v Speaker 4>a green might point down a point at the hook

0:24:41.440 --> 0:24:43.600
<v Speaker 4>side of the fairway, and how there was one of

0:24:43.600 --> 0:24:46.600
<v Speaker 4>his bite off strip bunkers that went down the right side.

0:24:46.920 --> 0:24:49.080
<v Speaker 4>And the more you bid off, the more you align

0:24:49.200 --> 0:24:52.760
<v Speaker 4>with the green. And I said, honest to God, I said, oh,

0:24:52.800 --> 0:24:56.920
<v Speaker 4>you stupid, sob you were on the edge of this,

0:24:57.760 --> 0:25:01.440
<v Speaker 4>but it didn't with the different old points didn't all

0:25:01.480 --> 0:25:07.160
<v Speaker 4>go together to make you realize it. And that day

0:25:08.359 --> 0:25:13.600
<v Speaker 4>what I thought about golf course design completely changed. So

0:25:14.400 --> 0:25:23.040
<v Speaker 4>it was really Pete's angles hit me. I didn't fully

0:25:24.240 --> 0:25:27.439
<v Speaker 4>form it in my mind or verbalize it. And then

0:25:27.560 --> 0:25:30.560
<v Speaker 4>Rayner McDonald I saw more of that. And then when

0:25:30.600 --> 0:25:36.440
<v Speaker 4>I saw this picture, it completely changed the way I thought.

0:25:36.480 --> 0:25:39.719
<v Speaker 4>I knew my carter's for play had to be much wider.

0:25:39.760 --> 0:25:42.120
<v Speaker 4>I knew we had to cut down trees to give

0:25:42.200 --> 0:25:48.159
<v Speaker 4>people the width that allows alternate routes. It was really

0:25:49.280 --> 0:25:54.919
<v Speaker 4>it was a interesting for me awaken For if you

0:25:54.960 --> 0:25:58.119
<v Speaker 4>said to me, Brian, what would you do different in

0:25:58.520 --> 0:26:02.000
<v Speaker 4>your life? I would say to you, well, I would

0:26:02.000 --> 0:26:04.120
<v Speaker 4>have gone to see all the golf courses I did

0:26:04.480 --> 0:26:06.480
<v Speaker 4>when I was working at the college, when I was

0:26:06.520 --> 0:26:09.240
<v Speaker 4>grown up, going to my dad's jobs, when I was

0:26:09.280 --> 0:26:12.720
<v Speaker 4>a USG green section agronomous. But I would have gone

0:26:12.760 --> 0:26:16.760
<v Speaker 4>and visited even more, and I would have stopped looking

0:26:16.800 --> 0:26:21.480
<v Speaker 4>at the turf. I would have looked at what I

0:26:21.560 --> 0:26:26.080
<v Speaker 4>call the skeleton, the tops of the t's, the top

0:26:26.119 --> 0:26:28.879
<v Speaker 4>of the fairway and the top of the green, and

0:26:28.920 --> 0:26:32.760
<v Speaker 4>I would look at what angles are presented by that,

0:26:33.480 --> 0:26:37.879
<v Speaker 4>because I think that that is ninety nine point nine

0:26:37.920 --> 0:26:41.720
<v Speaker 4>percent of what allows a golf course to be strategic,

0:26:42.200 --> 0:26:45.240
<v Speaker 4>but also what allows a golf course to be played

0:26:45.640 --> 0:26:48.320
<v Speaker 4>by the average and less than average player, but what

0:26:48.440 --> 0:26:51.800
<v Speaker 4>allows a golf course to still be mentally stimulating for

0:26:51.880 --> 0:26:56.359
<v Speaker 4>an excellent player. To me, it's all its angles and

0:26:56.440 --> 0:27:00.639
<v Speaker 4>almost nothing else. And so this age of the Internet,

0:27:01.920 --> 0:27:06.720
<v Speaker 4>Google Earth is my favorite site because when I get called, hey,

0:27:07.280 --> 0:27:09.680
<v Speaker 4>this is so and so from such and such country club,

0:27:10.160 --> 0:27:14.120
<v Speaker 4>I'm on Google Earth doing my homework before I get

0:27:14.160 --> 0:27:17.040
<v Speaker 4>out there. And and the funny thing is, you know,

0:27:17.080 --> 0:27:19.160
<v Speaker 4>they'll they'll say to me when I'm walking, of course,

0:27:19.400 --> 0:27:21.600
<v Speaker 4>so what do you think of the conditions? And I say, look,

0:27:21.720 --> 0:27:23.600
<v Speaker 4>I'll tell you what I think of the conditions, because

0:27:23.600 --> 0:27:25.680
<v Speaker 4>I kind of you know, I have a turf degree,

0:27:25.760 --> 0:27:28.840
<v Speaker 4>I have a master's training and plant and soil sciences.

0:27:28.880 --> 0:27:31.520
<v Speaker 4>I was a USDA agrantoist. But I said, I'm really

0:27:31.520 --> 0:27:36.480
<v Speaker 4>not here to tell you about your turf. I'm interested in, if,

0:27:36.520 --> 0:27:38.680
<v Speaker 4>if you'll forgive me, I think you should be interested

0:27:39.200 --> 0:27:41.719
<v Speaker 4>in the design character of your golf course. Does it

0:27:41.720 --> 0:27:45.880
<v Speaker 4>present angles, does it present alternate routes of play? And

0:27:45.920 --> 0:27:48.600
<v Speaker 4>so on and so forth. So those are my those

0:27:48.640 --> 0:27:52.120
<v Speaker 4>are my influences? In a long answer, Andy.

0:27:52.440 --> 0:27:56.719
<v Speaker 2>Uh so, I'm curious. I'm all about angles and strategy

0:27:57.320 --> 0:28:01.240
<v Speaker 2>and and I don't think it's really possible to have

0:28:01.320 --> 0:28:04.680
<v Speaker 2>those without wid Do you agree with that? You?

0:28:04.720 --> 0:28:09.360
<v Speaker 4>No, I couldn't agree more. And being that I'm an

0:28:09.359 --> 0:28:12.080
<v Speaker 4>old card I'm going to tell you secrets I don't

0:28:12.119 --> 0:28:17.119
<v Speaker 4>normally tell. I used to. I used to teach a

0:28:17.160 --> 0:28:21.240
<v Speaker 4>two day seminar, first with Bob Lowman and then Jan

0:28:21.359 --> 0:28:25.520
<v Speaker 4>Bell Jan for the Golf Course Superintendent's Association. And it

0:28:25.600 --> 0:28:30.640
<v Speaker 4>was on golf course renovation, restoration and construction. And one

0:28:30.720 --> 0:28:33.960
<v Speaker 4>day during the seminary, a kid said to me, how

0:28:34.000 --> 0:28:37.159
<v Speaker 4>why do you clear your corridors when you're building a

0:28:37.200 --> 0:28:41.760
<v Speaker 4>new course through the woods? And I, you know, I

0:28:41.760 --> 0:28:43.840
<v Speaker 4>I was honest. I said between one hundred and eighty

0:28:43.840 --> 0:28:47.640
<v Speaker 4>and two hundred feet. And at lunch Jan said to me,

0:28:48.280 --> 0:28:53.000
<v Speaker 4>did you misunderstand that question? And I said no? And

0:28:53.080 --> 0:28:55.719
<v Speaker 4>she said, well, Brian, how do you do all the

0:28:55.800 --> 0:28:59.280
<v Speaker 4>things you want to do on a golf hole in

0:28:59.360 --> 0:29:03.680
<v Speaker 4>such ant carder? This was before the light bulb went

0:29:03.760 --> 0:29:09.120
<v Speaker 4>on with the aerial photograph of PGA West of all places.

0:29:09.360 --> 0:29:11.600
<v Speaker 4>You know what I mean, you know, most people would

0:29:11.600 --> 0:29:14.240
<v Speaker 4>think of PGA West and some of the pot bunkers

0:29:14.240 --> 0:29:18.240
<v Speaker 4>and railroad ties and think it's not a sound course.

0:29:18.280 --> 0:29:21.240
<v Speaker 4>But you see, that's the trouble today. They're looking at

0:29:21.240 --> 0:29:24.920
<v Speaker 4>the superficial aspects of a golf course. They're not looking

0:29:24.960 --> 0:29:27.840
<v Speaker 4>at the skeleton. Don't tell me about the skin, which

0:29:27.880 --> 0:29:30.440
<v Speaker 4>is the turf, and don't tell me that much about

0:29:30.440 --> 0:29:34.240
<v Speaker 4>the muscles and tendons, which are some of the railroad ties.

0:29:34.560 --> 0:29:38.680
<v Speaker 4>What angles does it present? So Jan said that, and

0:29:38.720 --> 0:29:40.760
<v Speaker 4>that kind of had an effect on me. And then

0:29:40.800 --> 0:29:48.360
<v Speaker 4>there used to be a trade magazine. Jeez, I can't

0:29:48.360 --> 0:29:50.320
<v Speaker 4>remember the name of it now that we're talking about it,

0:29:50.720 --> 0:29:54.200
<v Speaker 4>but a law had been passed in Hawaii that said

0:29:54.240 --> 0:29:57.680
<v Speaker 4>you could only clear cards for golf holes like I

0:29:57.720 --> 0:30:02.040
<v Speaker 4>can't remember the number two hundred twenty your whatever feet wide.

0:30:02.480 --> 0:30:05.040
<v Speaker 4>And there was a comment from Nicholas that says, well,

0:30:05.040 --> 0:30:07.560
<v Speaker 4>I don't see how we can build golf courses anymore,

0:30:08.120 --> 0:30:12.760
<v Speaker 4>and his gosh, I credit Jack with something that's very

0:30:12.760 --> 0:30:16.440
<v Speaker 4>out of character. But Jan, because I really admired gence,

0:30:16.520 --> 0:30:19.000
<v Speaker 4>she was really a good friend of mine. And then

0:30:19.040 --> 0:30:22.120
<v Speaker 4>I saw this aerial photograph and I said, I can't

0:30:22.120 --> 0:30:24.080
<v Speaker 4>do what I want to do. It's like the tire

0:30:24.120 --> 0:30:28.640
<v Speaker 4>commercial wider is better, I can't do. And that's what

0:30:28.680 --> 0:30:34.040
<v Speaker 4>people used to say with the courses of mine. From

0:30:34.160 --> 0:30:36.520
<v Speaker 4>a little bit later time in my career. A guy

0:30:36.600 --> 0:30:38.800
<v Speaker 4>would play at friends of mine. They'd say, gee, you

0:30:38.840 --> 0:30:42.000
<v Speaker 4>could hit fit three of your original golf holes in

0:30:42.080 --> 0:30:46.960
<v Speaker 4>this golf hall. And I said, I wasn't doing it right.

0:30:47.680 --> 0:30:53.520
<v Speaker 4>It's got to be wider to allow the strategy and

0:30:53.560 --> 0:30:57.640
<v Speaker 4>the different angles. And you know, I used to do

0:30:57.800 --> 0:31:01.760
<v Speaker 4>lateral fairway bunkers like everybody in the sixties and a

0:31:01.800 --> 0:31:04.840
<v Speaker 4>lot of people still today. Now I turned most of

0:31:04.880 --> 0:31:08.360
<v Speaker 4>my fairway bunkers perpendicular shot, so they bite into the fairway.

0:31:08.400 --> 0:31:11.160
<v Speaker 4>Now I like the fairway to swing out to the

0:31:11.240 --> 0:31:14.720
<v Speaker 4>side the opposite side, so it's still the same with

0:31:15.720 --> 0:31:18.600
<v Speaker 4>pretty much going all the way down. But you know,

0:31:19.080 --> 0:31:21.560
<v Speaker 4>it's like I remember I saw Shinnecock when I worked

0:31:21.600 --> 0:31:24.160
<v Speaker 4>for the USGA, and there was something going on there.

0:31:24.160 --> 0:31:26.320
<v Speaker 4>I wasn't sure what it was. And when I read

0:31:26.440 --> 0:31:29.560
<v Speaker 4>articles about Shinnacock, it was, well, Shinnacock's a great course

0:31:29.920 --> 0:31:32.840
<v Speaker 4>because the fescue is blowing into the breeze and blah,

0:31:32.840 --> 0:31:36.360
<v Speaker 4>blah blah blah. That isn't it. It was because of

0:31:36.400 --> 0:31:39.800
<v Speaker 4>its sinewy fairways that moved to the right and then

0:31:39.880 --> 0:31:42.160
<v Speaker 4>back to the left. It's set up on the same

0:31:42.240 --> 0:31:45.440
<v Speaker 4>golf hole. It's set up fade drive zones, it set

0:31:45.520 --> 0:31:48.520
<v Speaker 4>up straight drive zones, it set up hook drive zones.

0:31:48.760 --> 0:31:50.880
<v Speaker 4>And when you it's the same as the s turns

0:31:50.920 --> 0:31:57.640
<v Speaker 4>that Pete puts into his fairways. So those things all

0:31:58.480 --> 0:32:02.960
<v Speaker 4>other people are able to coalesced these inputs quicker than

0:32:03.000 --> 0:32:07.200
<v Speaker 4>I did. But once I did, I knew it was

0:32:07.280 --> 0:32:11.040
<v Speaker 4>wider and that I really wanted to try to get

0:32:11.120 --> 0:32:15.480
<v Speaker 4>some of those turns into the fairways because they so

0:32:15.920 --> 0:32:17.200
<v Speaker 4>impacted strategy.

0:32:17.720 --> 0:32:22.680
<v Speaker 2>Well, I also imagine starting your career during that time,

0:32:23.320 --> 0:32:27.800
<v Speaker 2>it was common practice for penal and tight. You know,

0:32:27.960 --> 0:32:33.480
<v Speaker 2>hard golf was great golf, and it people wanted to

0:32:33.520 --> 0:32:37.160
<v Speaker 2>go out and struggle on the golf course. And that's

0:32:37.160 --> 0:32:41.040
<v Speaker 2>what you know the developers wanted were hard golf courses

0:32:41.440 --> 0:32:47.880
<v Speaker 2>as opposed to fun, playable and courses that really infuse thought.

0:32:50.040 --> 0:32:54.480
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, your kind and the honest god to suggest that,

0:32:57.280 --> 0:33:01.840
<v Speaker 4>I just think there's a million reasons for someone to

0:33:01.920 --> 0:33:11.480
<v Speaker 4>say why they weren't designing more strategic and thought provoking

0:33:11.520 --> 0:33:15.240
<v Speaker 4>golf courses. And I think the only good one is

0:33:16.880 --> 0:33:21.120
<v Speaker 4>they hadn't evolved at that point in their thinking, or

0:33:21.160 --> 0:33:25.720
<v Speaker 4>they just didn't think that way. I think that, you know,

0:33:25.800 --> 0:33:29.080
<v Speaker 4>there was thought, but Pete was still Pete was building

0:33:29.120 --> 0:33:33.920
<v Speaker 4>hired golf courses with tremendously sinewy fairways that were very

0:33:33.960 --> 0:33:37.840
<v Speaker 4>strategic that I could go to and play the sixty

0:33:37.840 --> 0:33:41.680
<v Speaker 4>three hundred yard marker and play to my handicap while

0:33:41.720 --> 0:33:45.120
<v Speaker 4>the pros from the back markers were having trouble. So

0:33:47.000 --> 0:33:55.440
<v Speaker 4>if you'll forgive me for saying, and I'm I am

0:33:55.560 --> 0:34:01.360
<v Speaker 4>a piece of evidence number one that it's just it's

0:34:01.360 --> 0:34:08.920
<v Speaker 4>a little bit of a helpful excuse, you know. I

0:34:08.960 --> 0:34:14.440
<v Speaker 4>think that I think that people could have sold their

0:34:14.440 --> 0:34:17.920
<v Speaker 4>developer on Look, we're going to make a great golf course.

0:34:18.000 --> 0:34:18.239
<v Speaker 2>Here.

0:34:19.520 --> 0:34:22.440
<v Speaker 4>Here's the eighth hole from Shinnecock that everyone raves about.

0:34:22.640 --> 0:34:25.480
<v Speaker 4>Here's the sixteenth hole at Chhinnacock that everyone raves about.

0:34:25.960 --> 0:34:29.200
<v Speaker 4>And I've taken out the hay down the sides so

0:34:29.239 --> 0:34:31.719
<v Speaker 4>you're not distracted by that. The reason this is a

0:34:31.760 --> 0:34:34.560
<v Speaker 4>great hole, well, the reasons this is a great hole

0:34:34.680 --> 0:34:38.880
<v Speaker 4>is the green points in a particular direction. The fairway

0:34:38.920 --> 0:34:41.920
<v Speaker 4>has lots of movement. If you want to set up

0:34:41.920 --> 0:34:45.239
<v Speaker 4>a shot a drive, so your approach shot works with

0:34:45.320 --> 0:34:47.719
<v Speaker 4>the angle of the green. You either need to drop

0:34:47.760 --> 0:34:50.160
<v Speaker 4>it short of that hook bunker, put it as close

0:34:50.200 --> 0:34:52.000
<v Speaker 4>to the right of the hook bunker as you can,

0:34:52.320 --> 0:34:55.000
<v Speaker 4>or hit a draw around that hook bunker and that

0:34:55.080 --> 0:34:57.080
<v Speaker 4>sets up the angle. And that's what makes it a

0:34:57.080 --> 0:34:59.279
<v Speaker 4>great golf course. And that's what I want to do

0:34:59.360 --> 0:35:01.320
<v Speaker 4>on your golf course. So you need to give me

0:35:01.360 --> 0:35:04.439
<v Speaker 4>a little more within the corridors between the houses going

0:35:04.480 --> 0:35:09.080
<v Speaker 4>down both sides, and that we could achieve that kind

0:35:09.120 --> 0:35:15.120
<v Speaker 4>of thing. So I think I think even today, you know,

0:35:15.560 --> 0:35:19.680
<v Speaker 4>there are visible people out there who were putting these

0:35:19.760 --> 0:35:22.720
<v Speaker 4>characteristics into their golf courses.

0:35:22.760 --> 0:35:23.040
<v Speaker 2>But I.

0:35:24.880 --> 0:35:27.240
<v Speaker 4>Think they could have put them in even in courses

0:35:27.239 --> 0:35:30.400
<v Speaker 4>in the eighties and nineties. They could have convinced their

0:35:30.440 --> 0:35:34.240
<v Speaker 4>owners that this can still be an interesting difficult because

0:35:34.320 --> 0:35:37.480
<v Speaker 4>I mean, look at PGA West, It's got sinewy fairways

0:35:37.480 --> 0:35:40.600
<v Speaker 4>and angles seven days a week. The pros played it.

0:35:41.400 --> 0:35:44.160
<v Speaker 4>The first year was open as a Bob Hope as

0:35:44.200 --> 0:35:47.279
<v Speaker 4>a courser in the Bob Hope Tournament, and then they

0:35:47.280 --> 0:35:50.840
<v Speaker 4>wrote a they all put a petition. They never wanted

0:35:50.840 --> 0:35:52.680
<v Speaker 4>to play it again, and they've never played it again,

0:35:52.840 --> 0:35:54.839
<v Speaker 4>although I think they played it this past year. Yeah,

0:35:55.560 --> 0:35:57.840
<v Speaker 4>part of the Bob Hope. Well now they played it

0:35:57.840 --> 0:36:00.719
<v Speaker 4>and they shoot sixty threes because they figured it out.

0:36:00.840 --> 0:36:06.240
<v Speaker 4>See that's the interesting thing the PGA West of the world.

0:36:06.280 --> 0:36:08.759
<v Speaker 4>Just forget the deep bunkers and the realities and all

0:36:08.800 --> 0:36:12.479
<v Speaker 4>that external stuff. You have to think when you play.

0:36:12.520 --> 0:36:16.359
<v Speaker 4>And that's what those holes that Hinnacock did. They did

0:36:16.360 --> 0:36:19.880
<v Speaker 4>what Ben Hogan used to say, on the best golf holes,

0:36:19.880 --> 0:36:22.920
<v Speaker 4>you have to think one shot ahead. And the trouble

0:36:23.000 --> 0:36:28.080
<v Speaker 4>is all golfers have played ninety percent of their rounds

0:36:28.080 --> 0:36:32.120
<v Speaker 4>of golf on courses that don't require that thought, so

0:36:32.520 --> 0:36:36.520
<v Speaker 4>they can often reject a course where you actually have

0:36:36.600 --> 0:36:39.120
<v Speaker 4>to think a little bit and kind of like tack

0:36:39.200 --> 0:36:45.080
<v Speaker 4>your way from waypoint to waypoint. In the winter, I

0:36:45.120 --> 0:36:47.000
<v Speaker 4>play a lot of golf and I'll say, look at

0:36:47.040 --> 0:36:49.960
<v Speaker 4>how this hole is set up. You should set up

0:36:50.000 --> 0:36:51.799
<v Speaker 4>on the right side of the tee. You always hit

0:36:51.880 --> 0:36:54.279
<v Speaker 4>fade that allow you to end up in the fair way.

0:36:54.320 --> 0:36:56.000
<v Speaker 4>It would be better if you were on the left hand.

0:36:56.239 --> 0:36:58.040
<v Speaker 4>And I've had my friends turn to me and say, well,

0:36:58.040 --> 0:37:01.000
<v Speaker 4>I don't want to think when I play, And I say, yeah,

0:37:01.000 --> 0:37:06.120
<v Speaker 4>but wait a minute. It's five seconds a shot. You

0:37:06.120 --> 0:37:10.080
<v Speaker 4>shoot a hundred, it's five hundred seconds. You need to

0:37:10.120 --> 0:37:13.839
<v Speaker 4>think for eight minutes. You can do that. I know

0:37:13.880 --> 0:37:14.279
<v Speaker 4>you can.

0:37:14.840 --> 0:37:19.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's a It requires a few, like brief seconds

0:37:19.880 --> 0:37:22.960
<v Speaker 2>of intense thought every couple of minutes.

0:37:24.200 --> 0:37:27.160
<v Speaker 4>No, and and people reject that. And you see it

0:37:27.200 --> 0:37:30.520
<v Speaker 4>in the poor average players who are hit and hook

0:37:30.600 --> 0:37:34.000
<v Speaker 4>every single shot, hit and fade every single shot, and

0:37:34.040 --> 0:37:35.480
<v Speaker 4>they tee it up in the middle of the tea

0:37:35.520 --> 0:37:40.040
<v Speaker 4>and they aim right down the middle. It's just if

0:37:40.040 --> 0:37:41.840
<v Speaker 4>they gave it a little more thought, you know, that

0:37:42.640 --> 0:37:46.560
<v Speaker 4>kind of course management when I sometimes think when someone

0:37:46.600 --> 0:37:49.479
<v Speaker 4>takes a lesson, you know, they should do it half

0:37:49.520 --> 0:37:52.600
<v Speaker 4>an hour on what are you having a problem with

0:37:53.400 --> 0:37:56.560
<v Speaker 4>your grip, let's work on your grip and we'll try

0:37:56.560 --> 0:37:59.640
<v Speaker 4>to improve that. And then the next half hour they

0:37:59.640 --> 0:38:02.919
<v Speaker 4>should it down and say, look at the golf hole

0:38:03.040 --> 0:38:06.040
<v Speaker 4>on the computer screen, where do you want to try

0:38:06.040 --> 0:38:08.359
<v Speaker 4>to hit it? And you know they'll say, well, I'm

0:38:08.400 --> 0:38:09.600
<v Speaker 4>not sure I want to hit it down the middle.

0:38:10.080 --> 0:38:11.920
<v Speaker 4>And then the pro would say, well, yeah, but look

0:38:11.920 --> 0:38:13.759
<v Speaker 4>at how that green, it's kind of what we call

0:38:13.840 --> 0:38:18.239
<v Speaker 4>a fade green. It it moves to the right from

0:38:18.239 --> 0:38:22.000
<v Speaker 4>front to back. You if you if you play a

0:38:22.000 --> 0:38:26.000
<v Speaker 4>fade you can fail positively. If it doesn't fade, you'll

0:38:26.040 --> 0:38:28.879
<v Speaker 4>have a longer put. But if it does fade, you're

0:38:28.920 --> 0:38:33.759
<v Speaker 4>closer to the pin. And by playing fade, because it's

0:38:33.760 --> 0:38:38.080
<v Speaker 4>a fade green, you'll take those nasty bunkers that play

0:38:38.080 --> 0:38:40.879
<v Speaker 4>a role in making it a fade green, you'll take

0:38:40.920 --> 0:38:44.479
<v Speaker 4>them completely out of play. So if folks could read

0:38:44.600 --> 0:38:48.399
<v Speaker 4>holes a little bit better, but again I don't, I'm

0:38:48.400 --> 0:38:51.600
<v Speaker 4>not giving them a hard time because the majority around

0:38:51.760 --> 0:38:55.200
<v Speaker 4>in their life, they haven't had a hole that was

0:38:55.239 --> 0:38:58.360
<v Speaker 4>set up so it could be read and played strategic.

0:38:58.960 --> 0:39:03.400
<v Speaker 2>And also that education, it's it's hard to learn about

0:39:03.400 --> 0:39:07.280
<v Speaker 2>that stuff. It's you know, I think it almost takes

0:39:07.280 --> 0:39:09.359
<v Speaker 2>an awakening and you hit on it a little bit

0:39:09.400 --> 0:39:12.279
<v Speaker 2>about not having a hole. But I see so many

0:39:12.280 --> 0:39:16.319
<v Speaker 2>of my friends. They they when they finally play a

0:39:16.480 --> 0:39:20.799
<v Speaker 2>great golf course, they that has the width and the

0:39:20.840 --> 0:39:25.440
<v Speaker 2>angles and the strategy, they finally realize that, wait, golf

0:39:25.840 --> 0:39:29.040
<v Speaker 2>can be different and there is like this better golf

0:39:29.440 --> 0:39:30.200
<v Speaker 2>that exists.

0:39:31.520 --> 0:39:35.160
<v Speaker 4>Ye, And when we make a change on an existing course.

0:39:35.960 --> 0:39:40.400
<v Speaker 4>I generally find that a good percentage of the players

0:39:41.560 --> 0:39:47.759
<v Speaker 4>find out something's going on by mistake. They hit it

0:39:47.800 --> 0:39:51.040
<v Speaker 4>down the left side, by mistake, they pull it, and

0:39:51.080 --> 0:39:53.440
<v Speaker 4>when they get there they see the green is completely

0:39:53.480 --> 0:39:56.880
<v Speaker 4>open to the next shot, and they start to connect

0:39:56.880 --> 0:39:59.759
<v Speaker 4>the dots, and then they start to look for that

0:40:00.080 --> 0:40:02.960
<v Speaker 4>more on the next hole and the next hole after that,

0:40:03.120 --> 0:40:06.960
<v Speaker 4>and the next hole after that. And the way that

0:40:07.040 --> 0:40:12.600
<v Speaker 4>it manifests itself sometimes is they'll say, oh, that was fun,

0:40:13.719 --> 0:40:16.000
<v Speaker 4>and I'll say, what do you mean by fun? I said,

0:40:16.000 --> 0:40:18.440
<v Speaker 4>do you mean easy? And they said, oh, no, how

0:40:18.440 --> 0:40:21.200
<v Speaker 4>could it be easy? You not go ahead? You put

0:40:21.200 --> 0:40:24.080
<v Speaker 4>one hundred and thirty bunkers out here. It's not easy.

0:40:24.120 --> 0:40:26.800
<v Speaker 4>But if we look at it, we see the route

0:40:27.320 --> 0:40:32.200
<v Speaker 4>we should go. And a lot of times it happens

0:40:32.280 --> 0:40:37.560
<v Speaker 4>when I play golf with them. I don't hit it

0:40:37.640 --> 0:40:40.640
<v Speaker 4>very long, but I don't miss many fairways, and I

0:40:40.719 --> 0:40:42.520
<v Speaker 4>can go down on one side or the other, and

0:40:42.520 --> 0:40:47.040
<v Speaker 4>they say, oh god, you can't hit it out of

0:40:47.040 --> 0:40:51.160
<v Speaker 4>your shadow. But I see how you look at the

0:40:51.200 --> 0:40:55.480
<v Speaker 4>holes and how you play them. I'm going to try that,

0:40:55.719 --> 0:41:03.440
<v Speaker 4>so you know. Unfortunately, I think most times people might

0:41:03.480 --> 0:41:07.759
<v Speaker 4>get to a shin a cock and it goes right

0:41:07.800 --> 0:41:11.120
<v Speaker 4>over their heads because they're looking at the hay and

0:41:10.840 --> 0:41:15.040
<v Speaker 4>the distant views and stuff like that. But there's stuff

0:41:15.040 --> 0:41:17.440
<v Speaker 4>out there. And then you know the other thing, Andy,

0:41:17.480 --> 0:41:21.799
<v Speaker 4>and and you know this, many of the courses in

0:41:21.840 --> 0:41:27.400
<v Speaker 4>the top one hundred don't have a shot value in them.

0:41:26.800 --> 0:41:30.040
<v Speaker 4>They're just in the top one hundred.

0:41:30.480 --> 0:41:33.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Well, I mean the top one hundred rankings are

0:41:33.440 --> 0:41:35.920
<v Speaker 2>flawed in the sense that it's not really about the

0:41:35.920 --> 0:41:39.839
<v Speaker 2>golf course. It's more about the experience, the aesthetics and

0:41:40.480 --> 0:41:44.920
<v Speaker 2>the Yeah, it's the window dressing. Really is that beyond

0:41:44.960 --> 0:41:46.399
<v Speaker 2>the experience.

0:41:45.880 --> 0:41:50.040
<v Speaker 4>The conditioning, it's it's it's all that stuff. And really

0:41:50.440 --> 0:41:54.480
<v Speaker 4>the contest should not be called best New Golf Courses

0:41:55.160 --> 0:41:58.520
<v Speaker 4>that that is the wrong name. They should be called

0:42:00.560 --> 0:42:03.800
<v Speaker 4>the golf course that was lucky enough to be sighted

0:42:04.440 --> 0:42:09.440
<v Speaker 4>on the most ridiculously foolish natural golf terrain ever conceived

0:42:09.480 --> 0:42:10.839
<v Speaker 4>by the Lord above.

0:42:12.719 --> 0:42:14.400
<v Speaker 2>Or had enough money to make that.

0:42:16.480 --> 0:42:22.359
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, it's interesting. You know, they're the only contests that

0:42:22.520 --> 0:42:30.560
<v Speaker 4>compare a you Goo versus against a Ferrari. Yeah, it's so,

0:42:31.400 --> 0:42:35.080
<v Speaker 4>but you I couldn't have said it better. You said

0:42:35.080 --> 0:42:38.520
<v Speaker 4>it it's all the externals. It's oh god, they came

0:42:38.560 --> 0:42:42.520
<v Speaker 4>out with cold towels for us to wipe our face

0:42:42.520 --> 0:42:46.399
<v Speaker 4>and put on our neck at the turn. And I mean,

0:42:46.760 --> 0:42:51.560
<v Speaker 4>look at most of the evaluation sheets the raiders fill out.

0:42:51.960 --> 0:42:54.720
<v Speaker 4>I think on one shot values is twenty percent.

0:42:56.960 --> 0:42:57.439
<v Speaker 2>What the hell?

0:42:59.200 --> 0:43:00.120
<v Speaker 4>What else is there?

0:43:00.800 --> 0:43:06.520
<v Speaker 2>Well, that's like there's no playability, there's no there. I

0:43:06.560 --> 0:43:10.239
<v Speaker 2>think it's I wrote a whole article about why, you know,

0:43:10.320 --> 0:43:13.640
<v Speaker 2>people shouldn't even pay attention to Golf Digest top one

0:43:13.719 --> 0:43:18.320
<v Speaker 2>hundred lists, and it just you know, the the rankings

0:43:18.360 --> 0:43:21.560
<v Speaker 2>would be fine if if it was called the top

0:43:21.600 --> 0:43:25.640
<v Speaker 2>one hundred golf experiences, but they call it the one

0:43:25.719 --> 0:43:31.799
<v Speaker 2>hundred greatest golf courses, and it's it's so it's it's misconstrued.

0:43:31.840 --> 0:43:34.160
<v Speaker 2>I've played a lot of these, a lot of courses

0:43:34.200 --> 0:43:37.759
<v Speaker 2>that are ranked above other courses that I know are

0:43:38.600 --> 0:43:41.440
<v Speaker 2>a lot better. And and but then when you read

0:43:41.840 --> 0:43:44.680
<v Speaker 2>the criteria and you and you start to look at

0:43:44.680 --> 0:43:49.759
<v Speaker 2>and understand the criteria, you understand why certain courses are

0:43:49.840 --> 0:43:53.759
<v Speaker 2>ranked in certain spots, and it's because, oh they have

0:43:54.160 --> 0:43:58.720
<v Speaker 2>a giant maintenance budget, or they have.

0:43:59.280 --> 0:44:03.839
<v Speaker 4>Comfort and history there. You know, that kind of thing.

0:44:04.960 --> 0:44:07.080
<v Speaker 4>I had a chance once to speak to a group

0:44:07.120 --> 0:44:13.879
<v Speaker 4>of raiders and and so I gave my history of

0:44:15.239 --> 0:44:22.040
<v Speaker 4>golf course design, and two funny things happened afterwards. One

0:44:22.160 --> 0:44:25.680
<v Speaker 4>was a guy got up and said, you kept using

0:44:25.760 --> 0:44:30.520
<v Speaker 4>this this was a raider. You kept using this term

0:44:30.520 --> 0:44:34.080
<v Speaker 4>and I've never heard it before. What's a radan?

0:44:34.880 --> 0:44:35.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah?

0:44:38.719 --> 0:44:42.680
<v Speaker 4>And then the coordinator of this of the panelists said

0:44:42.680 --> 0:44:45.800
<v Speaker 4>to me afterwards, he said, Wow, that was awesome. You

0:44:45.800 --> 0:44:48.720
<v Speaker 4>should write a book. And I have to give thee

0:44:49.000 --> 0:44:51.600
<v Speaker 4>some of the guys credit and gals because afterwards at

0:44:51.600 --> 0:44:53.360
<v Speaker 4>the cocktail how they said, could you give us a

0:44:53.360 --> 0:44:56.560
<v Speaker 4>copy of your PowerPoint? And I said, you know, I

0:44:56.640 --> 0:45:00.400
<v Speaker 4>really as much as I wanted them to know something

0:45:00.440 --> 0:45:05.680
<v Speaker 4>about design so that they for what they did. It

0:45:05.800 --> 0:45:08.799
<v Speaker 4>was just fascinating that those were to comment. And so

0:45:08.920 --> 0:45:13.040
<v Speaker 4>the next day I attended a seminar where one of

0:45:13.040 --> 0:45:15.480
<v Speaker 4>the they had various raiders get up and say, well,

0:45:15.640 --> 0:45:18.799
<v Speaker 4>how do you actually do your ratings? And this guy

0:45:18.840 --> 0:45:23.920
<v Speaker 4>got up and said, Tom, I'm a three handicap, and

0:45:23.960 --> 0:45:27.000
<v Speaker 4>when I rate a course, I bring my son, he's

0:45:27.040 --> 0:45:32.640
<v Speaker 4>a plus two, and he brings his wife, she's an eight.

0:45:33.760 --> 0:45:38.000
<v Speaker 4>So that way we get three distinctly different calibers of

0:45:38.120 --> 0:45:41.120
<v Speaker 4>golfers evaluating the course.

0:45:43.480 --> 0:45:45.000
<v Speaker 2>Kind of the same bucket.

0:45:46.120 --> 0:45:49.520
<v Speaker 4>You can't you can't make you can't make that stuff up.

0:45:49.880 --> 0:45:55.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's pretty awesome. So i'd love to talk a

0:45:55.560 --> 0:45:58.960
<v Speaker 2>little bit about more about Rainer and McDonald. I'm a

0:45:59.040 --> 0:46:02.920
<v Speaker 2>huge Rainer fan and we've got a lot of Rainer

0:46:02.960 --> 0:46:05.840
<v Speaker 2>fans that listen, and I would love to hear a

0:46:05.920 --> 0:46:12.080
<v Speaker 2>little bit about what your favorite template hole is of

0:46:12.400 --> 0:46:13.520
<v Speaker 2>all the template holes.

0:46:14.760 --> 0:46:19.680
<v Speaker 4>Uh, Andy, I I don't think I can. I don't.

0:46:20.280 --> 0:46:26.120
<v Speaker 4>I don't you mean, uh, this hole on this specific course, No,

0:46:26.400 --> 0:46:26.799
<v Speaker 4>just in.

0:46:26.719 --> 0:46:32.080
<v Speaker 2>General of like, you know what what overarching strategic you know, uh,

0:46:32.560 --> 0:46:36.600
<v Speaker 2>strategic hole template hole like from a strategy standpoint, or

0:46:37.080 --> 0:46:39.439
<v Speaker 2>just the way it sets up, the way it makes

0:46:39.480 --> 0:46:42.600
<v Speaker 2>you think is your favorite?

0:46:45.000 --> 0:46:48.760
<v Speaker 4>Wow, that's really really hard, you know. I would say

0:46:48.800 --> 0:46:56.160
<v Speaker 4>the the Radan, the Radan at the National, but I

0:46:56.239 --> 0:47:00.160
<v Speaker 4>just go out of my mind about the Alps at

0:47:00.200 --> 0:47:08.000
<v Speaker 4>the National. I'm really hard pressed. I think what I

0:47:08.080 --> 0:47:12.720
<v Speaker 4>really love, Andy, is I love to see the different

0:47:12.920 --> 0:47:17.120
<v Speaker 4>versions of the templates. And I think this is really important,

0:47:17.480 --> 0:47:21.399
<v Speaker 4>and this is something that's often missed, is that it's

0:47:22.120 --> 0:47:26.440
<v Speaker 4>the template holes are not like every rat Dan is

0:47:26.480 --> 0:47:30.880
<v Speaker 4>not exactly the same. Maybe more obvious to some people,

0:47:31.080 --> 0:47:34.120
<v Speaker 4>every Beirits is not the same. You know, every bes

0:47:34.200 --> 0:47:38.719
<v Speaker 4>Beirits is not the full three level Beirits. But I

0:47:38.760 --> 0:47:41.960
<v Speaker 4>think what they did so great was they had their

0:47:42.480 --> 0:47:47.960
<v Speaker 4>template holes, and they adapted and adopted them to various

0:47:48.000 --> 0:47:52.839
<v Speaker 4>pieces of land. Their goal was not to make each

0:47:53.080 --> 0:47:58.280
<v Speaker 4>version of the template exactly the same as every other version.

0:47:58.760 --> 0:48:05.160
<v Speaker 4>For example, if you play the seventeenth hole at Point

0:48:05.200 --> 0:48:08.280
<v Speaker 4>of Vidra at the Players Club, it's got a certain

0:48:08.320 --> 0:48:10.880
<v Speaker 4>look to it, so on and so forth. Well then

0:48:10.920 --> 0:48:13.759
<v Speaker 4>you play the seventeenth hole at PGA West, It's got

0:48:13.800 --> 0:48:19.240
<v Speaker 4>almost the exact same look to it. Where each radan

0:48:19.520 --> 0:48:23.320
<v Speaker 4>is different, each punch bowl is different. You know, when

0:48:23.360 --> 0:48:25.680
<v Speaker 4>I'm driving up the driveway, I wonder if they have

0:48:25.719 --> 0:48:28.280
<v Speaker 4>a punch bowl, and I wonder if it's a natural

0:48:28.360 --> 0:48:32.000
<v Speaker 4>punch bowl where the land was like that, like many

0:48:32.040 --> 0:48:34.719
<v Speaker 4>of them are, or is it more a contrived or

0:48:34.800 --> 0:48:39.880
<v Speaker 4>constructed punch bowl, which some of them are. So I

0:48:39.920 --> 0:48:45.440
<v Speaker 4>think I'm not really answering your question. What my favorite

0:48:45.520 --> 0:48:50.080
<v Speaker 4>thing about the templates is is to see how they

0:48:50.160 --> 0:48:55.319
<v Speaker 4>are different from course to course. I think that that

0:48:55.680 --> 0:49:01.000
<v Speaker 4>is really really fascinating. Look. A great one is Alps.

0:49:02.640 --> 0:49:06.000
<v Speaker 4>Look at Alps at the National there is a huge

0:49:06.760 --> 0:49:09.480
<v Speaker 4>bunker where you bite off as much as you dare

0:49:10.120 --> 0:49:13.040
<v Speaker 4>and then your second shot is blind up to the

0:49:13.040 --> 0:49:18.560
<v Speaker 4>top of that hill. Well, that bears no relationship other

0:49:18.640 --> 0:49:23.200
<v Speaker 4>than strategically, which is of course mildly important to nuts

0:49:23.280 --> 0:49:27.320
<v Speaker 4>like you and me. To the Alps at your acres

0:49:30.000 --> 0:49:34.440
<v Speaker 4>or Fox Chapel where there is that bite off bunker

0:49:34.480 --> 0:49:36.480
<v Speaker 4>on one side or the other. But at both of

0:49:36.520 --> 0:49:40.040
<v Speaker 4>those courses there are mounds where if you bite off

0:49:40.040 --> 0:49:41.719
<v Speaker 4>a lot of the bunker you have a view of

0:49:41.719 --> 0:49:44.960
<v Speaker 4>the green. If you bail out, there are mounds in

0:49:45.040 --> 0:49:47.920
<v Speaker 4>the front and side of the green that block the

0:49:48.000 --> 0:49:54.960
<v Speaker 4>view of the green. So there are two completely different

0:49:55.160 --> 0:49:59.440
<v Speaker 4>versions of the template. Yes, and it's like each one

0:49:59.480 --> 0:50:01.920
<v Speaker 4>of them is very cool.

0:50:02.520 --> 0:50:05.480
<v Speaker 2>It's like Fisher's if you hit it, if you take

0:50:05.520 --> 0:50:08.319
<v Speaker 2>on the water down the right side, you get a

0:50:08.360 --> 0:50:10.239
<v Speaker 2>small sliver of a view of the green.

0:50:11.960 --> 0:50:18.600
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, it's very very cool. So I think that's one thing,

0:50:18.880 --> 0:50:22.640
<v Speaker 4>and you know it, as you said, it's a real

0:50:22.800 --> 0:50:29.319
<v Speaker 4>external thing. When when somebody writes an article and God

0:50:29.360 --> 0:50:34.160
<v Speaker 4>bless them the night that Yale was always pictured as

0:50:34.280 --> 0:50:39.440
<v Speaker 4>one of the templates. Yeah, or some other really really

0:50:39.560 --> 0:50:45.560
<v Speaker 4>famous and maybe more outlandish version of a template is

0:50:45.600 --> 0:50:49.239
<v Speaker 4>what is pictured. But again, are there are Alps? I

0:50:49.239 --> 0:50:52.400
<v Speaker 4>remember one time we were talking about an Alps and

0:50:52.440 --> 0:50:54.600
<v Speaker 4>the guy said, you explained to me what the Alps is.

0:50:55.360 --> 0:50:57.160
<v Speaker 4>And he said to me afterwards, a friend of mine,

0:50:57.840 --> 0:51:01.520
<v Speaker 4>you have no idea what an Alps is. And I says,

0:51:01.520 --> 0:51:04.400
<v Speaker 4>what do you mean? He says, well, what you described

0:51:04.719 --> 0:51:08.440
<v Speaker 4>is no relationship to the Alps at the National and

0:51:08.480 --> 0:51:13.000
<v Speaker 4>I said, well, forgive me, but the Alps at the

0:51:13.080 --> 0:51:20.160
<v Speaker 4>National has no match in other Alps by Rayner and McDonald,

0:51:20.560 --> 0:51:24.239
<v Speaker 4>I think what you're missing is the lay of the

0:51:24.320 --> 0:51:27.880
<v Speaker 4>land can be. It's not the lay of the land

0:51:27.920 --> 0:51:30.719
<v Speaker 4>that really made it, it was how they set it

0:51:30.800 --> 0:51:34.680
<v Speaker 4>up strategically. So for me, I think that is the

0:51:34.840 --> 0:51:40.799
<v Speaker 4>coolest thing about Rayner and McDonald is the presentation of

0:51:41.560 --> 0:51:46.000
<v Speaker 4>each template is different from course to course, and that's

0:51:46.000 --> 0:51:48.839
<v Speaker 4>what makes it so much fun. When you're driving up

0:51:48.880 --> 0:51:51.719
<v Speaker 4>the driveway, you're saying, I wonder if it's going to

0:51:51.719 --> 0:51:54.799
<v Speaker 4>be like the National where I can actually kick a

0:51:54.800 --> 0:51:57.400
<v Speaker 4>low shot off that right front corner of the radan

0:51:57.920 --> 0:52:01.959
<v Speaker 4>and have it go kind of diagonally to that tuck

0:52:02.120 --> 0:52:05.640
<v Speaker 4>left pin. Well, not all of them work that great

0:52:06.080 --> 0:52:10.600
<v Speaker 4>in that regard. The Redan at Fishers doesn't work quite

0:52:10.760 --> 0:52:15.959
<v Speaker 4>like that. The Redan at Yeaman's Hall, it isn't quite

0:52:16.120 --> 0:52:19.680
<v Speaker 4>like that. But that's what makes them interesting, because it's

0:52:19.800 --> 0:52:25.120
<v Speaker 4>just not one golf course repeated seventy five times mm.

0:52:26.560 --> 0:52:30.080
<v Speaker 4>Each one has its own interests. I think that is

0:52:30.160 --> 0:52:33.239
<v Speaker 4>the nature of their brilliance. And the other thing was

0:52:34.160 --> 0:52:40.040
<v Speaker 4>it doesn't appear that what they were doing struck them

0:52:40.080 --> 0:52:43.839
<v Speaker 4>as outlandish. They just thought they were building a good

0:52:43.840 --> 0:52:47.880
<v Speaker 4>golf course. Whereas today, if I do a lot of

0:52:47.920 --> 0:52:51.799
<v Speaker 4>punch bowl greens, people say, well, what the hell is that?

0:52:52.800 --> 0:52:55.560
<v Speaker 4>Or a radan I couldn't hold my ball on the green?

0:52:55.760 --> 0:52:58.720
<v Speaker 4>Why does it pitch away from the shot? See, today

0:52:58.760 --> 0:53:02.000
<v Speaker 4>it appears outlandish. They just they just were going about

0:53:02.040 --> 0:53:07.680
<v Speaker 4>their business building cool golf courses that were you know

0:53:07.760 --> 0:53:10.880
<v Speaker 4>that we're based on When you go back and you read,

0:53:11.520 --> 0:53:13.879
<v Speaker 4>you know, I'm just thrilled if people are able to

0:53:14.080 --> 0:53:17.680
<v Speaker 4>recognize a template, if they would ever go back and

0:53:17.760 --> 0:53:21.919
<v Speaker 4>read Scotland's Gift and and see how McDonald came up

0:53:22.239 --> 0:53:27.240
<v Speaker 4>to selecting the templates. It's just it couldn't be more fascinating.

0:53:27.280 --> 0:53:31.760
<v Speaker 2>You know. One of my, uh, my favorite things about

0:53:31.920 --> 0:53:34.799
<v Speaker 2>the template holes is exactly what you said, is like,

0:53:35.480 --> 0:53:39.360
<v Speaker 2>I remember this winter I played Mountain Lake and driving

0:53:39.400 --> 0:53:42.680
<v Speaker 2>in you see the burits and you're like, oh wow,

0:53:42.760 --> 0:53:45.360
<v Speaker 2>and and you I think that's one of the things

0:53:45.400 --> 0:53:48.279
<v Speaker 2>people why people love watching the Masters year and year

0:53:48.320 --> 0:53:50.600
<v Speaker 2>out is that they know what's coming.

0:53:51.239 --> 0:53:53.400
<v Speaker 4>It's familiar to them, no doubt.

0:53:53.280 --> 0:53:56.120
<v Speaker 2>And an understanding of templates. And and I love like,

0:53:56.440 --> 0:53:59.399
<v Speaker 2>you know, when you play a Rainer course, you're you're

0:53:59.440 --> 0:54:02.640
<v Speaker 2>waiting to see what's around the next corner, and you know,

0:54:02.800 --> 0:54:06.680
<v Speaker 2>you see these different versions of it, like like Mountain

0:54:06.760 --> 0:54:10.320
<v Speaker 2>Lake's road hole is completely different than say Shore Acres

0:54:10.400 --> 0:54:15.120
<v Speaker 2>road hole or National's road hole, and it's it is unique.

0:54:15.160 --> 0:54:18.320
<v Speaker 2>And I think that's where it's so misunderstood is people

0:54:18.360 --> 0:54:21.080
<v Speaker 2>think that it's just, you know, a replica course, but

0:54:21.280 --> 0:54:24.120
<v Speaker 2>it's it's not a replica course in any way.

0:54:25.640 --> 0:54:29.960
<v Speaker 4>No, it's it that's a real good connection. Andy. That's

0:54:30.000 --> 0:54:37.799
<v Speaker 4>that's what they think it is. And it's it's unquestioned. Uh,

0:54:38.440 --> 0:54:42.400
<v Speaker 4>it isn't that. But you know, on the other hand,

0:54:43.200 --> 0:54:46.520
<v Speaker 4>you could go to a contemporary course where an architect

0:54:46.920 --> 0:54:50.680
<v Speaker 4>copies a hole and it's exactly like the other version.

0:54:51.960 --> 0:54:54.759
<v Speaker 4>You know, it hasn't been an adaptation of it. And

0:54:55.280 --> 0:55:00.160
<v Speaker 4>you know, I read an article once where one the

0:55:00.200 --> 0:55:05.120
<v Speaker 4>more famous contemporary architects said, well, why would I want

0:55:05.160 --> 0:55:08.680
<v Speaker 4>to repeat themes on a golf hole when there are

0:55:08.719 --> 0:55:16.319
<v Speaker 4>so many new themes still to be designed or practiced,

0:55:16.960 --> 0:55:23.279
<v Speaker 4>And you know, it was just such a ludicrous thing

0:55:23.360 --> 0:55:26.400
<v Speaker 4>to say, especially if you investigated the body of work

0:55:27.160 --> 0:55:31.279
<v Speaker 4>that you know he's talking about. Yeah, it's hard to

0:55:31.360 --> 0:55:34.160
<v Speaker 4>charge two million. It's hard to charge a million or

0:55:34.160 --> 0:55:36.240
<v Speaker 4>two million on a course when you tell the client

0:55:36.760 --> 0:55:39.840
<v Speaker 4>I'm going to base this on the work of Rainer

0:55:39.880 --> 0:55:42.440
<v Speaker 4>and McDonald's.

0:55:44.480 --> 0:55:50.160
<v Speaker 2>So we got a lot of questions from readers and followers.

0:55:50.239 --> 0:55:54.560
<v Speaker 2>I put out that you were coming on, and so

0:55:54.640 --> 0:55:57.480
<v Speaker 2>I wanted to get to a few of those if sure.

0:55:58.320 --> 0:56:02.200
<v Speaker 2>So here's a question. And so everyone seems to and

0:56:02.200 --> 0:56:05.320
<v Speaker 2>this is from Michael Wolfe, everyone seems to now agree

0:56:05.360 --> 0:56:08.560
<v Speaker 2>getting back to the GCA principles of nineteen hundred to

0:56:08.640 --> 0:56:12.919
<v Speaker 2>nineteen thirties is best for golf and restorations are where

0:56:12.920 --> 0:56:16.320
<v Speaker 2>the work is now. He wants to know what about

0:56:16.360 --> 0:56:20.719
<v Speaker 2>the hundreds of golf courses, hundreds and thousands of golf

0:56:20.760 --> 0:56:23.719
<v Speaker 2>courses built in the eighties and nineties, and what do

0:56:23.760 --> 0:56:29.480
<v Speaker 2>you do with all them? Like, can these residential courses

0:56:29.560 --> 0:56:34.040
<v Speaker 2>that were built with narrow fairways be retrofitted in any way?

0:56:34.160 --> 0:56:41.080
<v Speaker 4>Or I think they can? And Andy, you know, we

0:56:41.160 --> 0:56:45.200
<v Speaker 4>all have to be those of us who are betrothed

0:56:45.800 --> 0:56:49.319
<v Speaker 4>to the nineteen hundreds to nineteen thirties. We have to

0:56:49.400 --> 0:56:54.920
<v Speaker 4>admit not everyone that was built in was great. You know,

0:56:54.960 --> 0:56:57.920
<v Speaker 4>there were a lot of eighteen steaks on a Sunday

0:56:57.960 --> 0:57:03.520
<v Speaker 4>afternoon that were not tremendous golf courses. You know, we

0:57:03.600 --> 0:57:06.399
<v Speaker 4>think of a place like Seminole that to me has

0:57:06.719 --> 0:57:13.120
<v Speaker 4>the greatest alternating shot shapes of any ross course I've

0:57:13.160 --> 0:57:17.280
<v Speaker 4>ever seen, spectacularly well done. I think, the greatest angles

0:57:17.320 --> 0:57:19.960
<v Speaker 4>of any ross course I've ever seen. But you know,

0:57:20.080 --> 0:57:24.960
<v Speaker 4>Donald and aw and all the rest of the gang,

0:57:25.120 --> 0:57:29.200
<v Speaker 4>they didn't do all the courses built. But I think

0:57:29.760 --> 0:57:35.200
<v Speaker 4>you can still do a good job even without a

0:57:35.240 --> 0:57:39.520
<v Speaker 4>three hundred foot wide card, or you can still well,

0:57:39.640 --> 0:57:43.400
<v Speaker 4>let me say, I've worked on those courses. I haven't

0:57:43.440 --> 0:57:46.280
<v Speaker 4>seen one where you can't get some twist and turn

0:57:46.360 --> 0:57:50.000
<v Speaker 4>in the fairways where you can't get the fairway bunkers

0:57:50.440 --> 0:57:54.000
<v Speaker 4>to more significantly impact the twist and turn, where you

0:57:54.040 --> 0:58:00.840
<v Speaker 4>can't think about angles on the greens. In all honesty,

0:58:00.160 --> 0:58:03.880
<v Speaker 4>I think the narrowness of the car is I don't

0:58:03.960 --> 0:58:06.080
<v Speaker 4>like it, but I think it's a little bit too

0:58:06.160 --> 0:58:09.520
<v Speaker 4>comfortable an excuse to use for why a course couldn't

0:58:09.560 --> 0:58:12.680
<v Speaker 4>be made more interesting to play and more fun to play.

0:58:13.320 --> 0:58:16.680
<v Speaker 2>So how would you go about, you know, kind of

0:58:17.120 --> 0:58:21.080
<v Speaker 2>working with narrow corridors now that you're kind of awakening.

0:58:21.240 --> 0:58:24.040
<v Speaker 2>Say somebody said, hey, we want to bring you back

0:58:24.080 --> 0:58:26.680
<v Speaker 2>to one of your courses in the early days where

0:58:26.720 --> 0:58:28.240
<v Speaker 2>you built with narrow fairways.

0:58:30.480 --> 0:58:37.760
<v Speaker 4>Well, I am I would still if I went back

0:58:37.760 --> 0:58:39.840
<v Speaker 4>to one of my courses where my fairways are thirty

0:58:39.880 --> 0:58:45.120
<v Speaker 4>yards wide, I would still put bunkers in that. There's

0:58:45.280 --> 0:58:49.640
<v Speaker 4>always room in the original tree planting to let a

0:58:49.680 --> 0:58:52.040
<v Speaker 4>bunker stick into the fairway, say on the hook side,

0:58:52.360 --> 0:58:55.560
<v Speaker 4>and let it swing out more and narrow the amount

0:58:55.560 --> 0:58:58.360
<v Speaker 4>of rough until you get to the trees, so you

0:58:58.480 --> 0:59:04.600
<v Speaker 4>get that sinewy type. I guess, I guess that's one

0:59:04.600 --> 0:59:07.160
<v Speaker 4>of the first things I think about. I was just

0:59:07.200 --> 0:59:10.640
<v Speaker 4>doing it the other day on Google Earth, where someone

0:59:10.680 --> 0:59:12.840
<v Speaker 4>had called me and I looked at their golf course,

0:59:13.200 --> 0:59:15.320
<v Speaker 4>and I was already trying to think of how I

0:59:15.400 --> 0:59:18.920
<v Speaker 4>could get more movement. Now, Andy, I don't mean movement

0:59:19.080 --> 0:59:23.120
<v Speaker 4>like contour mowing, where the fairway is thirty five yards

0:59:23.160 --> 0:59:27.800
<v Speaker 4>wide for the shortest hitter, twenty yards wide for the

0:59:27.840 --> 0:59:30.760
<v Speaker 4>guy who hits a two twenty and then ten yards wide,

0:59:31.120 --> 0:59:35.160
<v Speaker 4>that thing from the eighties and the early nineties. I

0:59:35.240 --> 0:59:38.840
<v Speaker 4>mean a fairly consistent with the fairway that just twists

0:59:38.880 --> 0:59:42.200
<v Speaker 4>and turns on its way to the green. So I

0:59:42.240 --> 0:59:47.600
<v Speaker 4>think you can do it in narrow carridors and narrow fairways.

0:59:47.640 --> 0:59:52.240
<v Speaker 4>And because usually when I did narrow fairways, I had

0:59:52.240 --> 0:59:54.520
<v Speaker 4>a good amount of rough, and I would see some

0:59:54.600 --> 0:59:56.960
<v Speaker 4>of that rough being converted to fairway.

0:59:56.840 --> 0:59:59.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, widening out. I think that's a good strategy, is

1:00:00.080 --> 1:00:04.360
<v Speaker 2>getting turning a lot of the rough into fairway and getting.

1:00:04.040 --> 1:00:07.800
<v Speaker 4>A little week I said that I would not mention

1:00:07.960 --> 1:00:11.560
<v Speaker 4>names of golf courses that I work on, because it's

1:00:11.640 --> 1:00:15.320
<v Speaker 4>kind of the club's business, and I know that's what

1:00:15.360 --> 1:00:17.400
<v Speaker 4>everybody likes to do. When I worked at so and so,

1:00:17.480 --> 1:00:19.840
<v Speaker 4>and I worked and such and such, but we worked

1:00:19.840 --> 1:00:22.920
<v Speaker 4>at a nineteen sixties designed golf course on Long Island

1:00:23.000 --> 1:00:25.800
<v Speaker 4>last year, and I would say one of the main

1:00:25.920 --> 1:00:29.640
<v Speaker 4>things we did was turn the angle of the bunkers

1:00:30.520 --> 1:00:34.440
<v Speaker 4>and make the fairways bigger and there was room to

1:00:34.520 --> 1:00:38.040
<v Speaker 4>do the twist and turn. And I would say that

1:00:39.600 --> 1:00:45.800
<v Speaker 4>they range between pleasantly surprised to completely stunned how they

1:00:45.840 --> 1:00:48.600
<v Speaker 4>have to think on their golf course now. It was

1:00:48.720 --> 1:00:52.840
<v Speaker 4>just the typical sixties golf course, dead straight fairway edges

1:00:53.600 --> 1:00:59.280
<v Speaker 4>and bunkers that were parallel to the center line and

1:00:59.440 --> 1:01:03.360
<v Speaker 4>never impact play. So I think you can do it

1:01:03.360 --> 1:01:05.880
<v Speaker 4>even in narrow card is. Obviously you can't do it

1:01:05.920 --> 1:01:09.680
<v Speaker 4>as well, but you can still get that feel of

1:01:10.200 --> 1:01:10.680
<v Speaker 4>the flow.

1:01:12.640 --> 1:01:17.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, that it makes sense. It's so David Grady

1:01:18.040 --> 1:01:24.560
<v Speaker 2>wants to know how kind of renovation and restoration has

1:01:24.640 --> 1:01:27.760
<v Speaker 2>evolved over the past twenty years.

1:01:28.640 --> 1:01:34.240
<v Speaker 4>Well for me, you know, it's hard for me to

1:01:34.240 --> 1:01:40.280
<v Speaker 4>speak for everyone. You know, I've never been the mouthpiece

1:01:40.360 --> 1:01:45.080
<v Speaker 4>for the craft, but I would say at the very

1:01:45.200 --> 1:01:53.360
<v Speaker 4>least there appears to be more appreciation for as a

1:01:53.400 --> 1:01:57.520
<v Speaker 4>first step trying to determine what that golf course was

1:01:57.600 --> 1:02:05.440
<v Speaker 4>like originally and then seeing what of that you could

1:02:06.880 --> 1:02:16.240
<v Speaker 4>emphasize in your work and what to me, if this

1:02:16.320 --> 1:02:20.720
<v Speaker 4>is an older course, what vintage of character, what vintage

1:02:20.800 --> 1:02:24.120
<v Speaker 4>characteristics you could put into the course and put them

1:02:24.120 --> 1:02:26.040
<v Speaker 4>in in a manner that people think that they were

1:02:26.080 --> 1:02:32.439
<v Speaker 4>always there if they weren't there originally. So I think

1:02:32.480 --> 1:02:37.320
<v Speaker 4>there's a little bit more appreciation for what might have

1:02:37.360 --> 1:02:40.320
<v Speaker 4>been there originally today. I think there's a little bit

1:02:40.360 --> 1:02:43.680
<v Speaker 4>more appreciation for what was there originally and what may

1:02:43.720 --> 1:02:46.400
<v Speaker 4>have been taken out. But you know, you still hear

1:02:46.480 --> 1:02:50.600
<v Speaker 4>about this course or that course fill in the blank

1:02:50.680 --> 1:02:57.440
<v Speaker 4>here designed by a golden age architect, that the club

1:02:57.520 --> 1:03:01.439
<v Speaker 4>is not entirely appreciative of that, and who they hire

1:03:01.520 --> 1:03:04.920
<v Speaker 4>is not totally appreciative of that, and they get a

1:03:05.000 --> 1:03:10.640
<v Speaker 4>course in the fill in the architect's name mode. So

1:03:10.960 --> 1:03:13.880
<v Speaker 4>I think folks like you and me, Andy, who like

1:03:14.000 --> 1:03:18.439
<v Speaker 4>that stuff, think that it's everywhere and it's it's fire

1:03:18.520 --> 1:03:19.280
<v Speaker 4>from everywhere.

1:03:19.360 --> 1:03:25.000
<v Speaker 2>Yet, So, what what's the course that you'd like to

1:03:25.000 --> 1:03:30.360
<v Speaker 2>see host a major championship that hasn't or isn't hosting

1:03:30.400 --> 1:03:31.600
<v Speaker 2>major championships?

1:03:35.720 --> 1:03:44.240
<v Speaker 4>Oh boy, I Andy, I I don't know off the

1:03:44.240 --> 1:03:48.600
<v Speaker 4>top of my head. You know, I'm trying to kind

1:03:48.600 --> 1:03:55.440
<v Speaker 4>of factor in. I'm kind of trying to factor in, uh,

1:03:55.720 --> 1:04:01.240
<v Speaker 4>the way they set up these major championships. You know,

1:04:01.280 --> 1:04:05.200
<v Speaker 4>I find it interesting that, you know, the major golf

1:04:05.240 --> 1:04:08.720
<v Speaker 4>associations pick some of these out of the box sites

1:04:08.840 --> 1:04:13.560
<v Speaker 4>that kind of don't fit into the wing foot Oakmont,

1:04:14.040 --> 1:04:17.240
<v Speaker 4>Southern Hills, Pebble Beach, you know what I mean, the

1:04:18.040 --> 1:04:22.680
<v Speaker 4>typical ROTA, and and they pick them five years before

1:04:23.160 --> 1:04:25.960
<v Speaker 4>they play them, and then they spend three or five

1:04:26.000 --> 1:04:30.520
<v Speaker 4>million dollars getting the course ready for the event. There's

1:04:30.600 --> 1:04:37.000
<v Speaker 4>a degree of standardization that I get discomforted by. I'm

1:04:37.000 --> 1:04:42.040
<v Speaker 4>not doing very good naming courses that I think should

1:04:42.080 --> 1:04:45.320
<v Speaker 4>be uh, you know, major sites.

1:04:47.640 --> 1:04:50.000
<v Speaker 1>It's okay, it's a question.

1:04:50.120 --> 1:04:54.360
<v Speaker 2>I always always think about it. Yeah, but one of

1:04:54.440 --> 1:04:56.919
<v Speaker 2>the big problems is the ball. You know, it goes

1:04:57.040 --> 1:04:59.160
<v Speaker 2>just too far for a lot of these courses. And

1:04:59.280 --> 1:05:02.320
<v Speaker 2>then you also combined the infrastructure needed.

1:05:03.360 --> 1:05:06.000
<v Speaker 4>You know, it's really the it's the great shame of

1:05:06.040 --> 1:05:11.280
<v Speaker 4>the game that it's broken into two armed camps. There's

1:05:11.320 --> 1:05:15.880
<v Speaker 4>a camp that loves the game of golf, and unfortunately

1:05:15.880 --> 1:05:19.120
<v Speaker 4>that's the small camp now. And there's a camp that

1:05:19.240 --> 1:05:23.600
<v Speaker 4>loves the business of golf, and the camp in the

1:05:23.640 --> 1:05:30.840
<v Speaker 4>business of golf has so directly or indirectly intimidated the

1:05:30.960 --> 1:05:34.640
<v Speaker 4>ruling bodies of golf that they won't take the step

1:05:34.800 --> 1:05:38.640
<v Speaker 4>that is absolutely essential, and that is to slow down

1:05:38.680 --> 1:05:46.000
<v Speaker 4>the ball. It's really a shame. It's the game's unfinest moment. Yeah,

1:05:46.360 --> 1:05:47.880
<v Speaker 4>that this continues.

1:05:48.320 --> 1:05:51.640
<v Speaker 2>I was out at Skochy yesterday. I was walking with

1:05:51.720 --> 1:05:54.400
<v Speaker 2>a guy and he was like, man, how great would

1:05:54.440 --> 1:05:56.840
<v Speaker 2>it be to see a major championship at this place?

1:05:56.880 --> 1:05:59.560
<v Speaker 2>And It's like, it would be great. The greens are

1:05:59.640 --> 1:06:03.520
<v Speaker 2>unbelieve but you can't because the ball just goes too far.

1:06:05.080 --> 1:06:08.840
<v Speaker 4>I think that's part of my answer of my inability

1:06:08.880 --> 1:06:12.960
<v Speaker 4>to answer the question. There are dozens and dozens of

1:06:13.040 --> 1:06:20.640
<v Speaker 4>courses like Skokie that I would love to see if

1:06:20.640 --> 1:06:24.280
<v Speaker 4>we could just turn the clock back to the late

1:06:24.360 --> 1:06:28.200
<v Speaker 4>sixties and the players had to hit into a green.

1:06:28.280 --> 1:06:30.680
<v Speaker 4>What Nicholas and players like that were hitting into a green?

1:06:31.640 --> 1:06:36.640
<v Speaker 4>That would be my dream to see that happen. But

1:06:36.960 --> 1:06:40.760
<v Speaker 4>you know that will never happen, And so that makes

1:06:40.760 --> 1:06:43.440
<v Speaker 4>it hard for me to answer which one would you

1:06:43.960 --> 1:06:46.920
<v Speaker 4>like to see a major event at? Because I'd like

1:06:46.960 --> 1:06:50.480
<v Speaker 4>to see a major event at hundreds of them, but

1:06:50.680 --> 1:06:55.560
<v Speaker 4>not with today's equipment. Yeah, I believe that. I believe

1:06:55.640 --> 1:06:59.160
<v Speaker 4>that working the ball is part of the game, and

1:06:59.240 --> 1:07:01.280
<v Speaker 4>I'm going to go to my grave thinking it should

1:07:01.360 --> 1:07:03.520
<v Speaker 4>be part of the game. And like on the tour,

1:07:03.600 --> 1:07:06.760
<v Speaker 4>now it's not. It's just power golf. But I think

1:07:06.800 --> 1:07:09.440
<v Speaker 4>a guy standing up on a tee reading the hole

1:07:09.480 --> 1:07:12.400
<v Speaker 4>and saying I want to cut this one, or standing

1:07:12.480 --> 1:07:13.880
<v Speaker 4>up on the tee and I want to turn this

1:07:14.000 --> 1:07:17.120
<v Speaker 4>the other way, and and here's an angle of a green.

1:07:17.480 --> 1:07:21.080
<v Speaker 4>I can fail positively by hitting a fade, because if

1:07:21.120 --> 1:07:22.920
<v Speaker 4>I fail to hit a fade and hit it straight,

1:07:23.280 --> 1:07:25.920
<v Speaker 4>I'm putting. It's a longer put. But if I am

1:07:26.360 --> 1:07:30.320
<v Speaker 4>a successful hitting a fade, I'm putting for birdie. So

1:07:30.560 --> 1:07:35.040
<v Speaker 4>the equipment thing is just just overwhelming. I mean, I

1:07:35.080 --> 1:07:38.840
<v Speaker 4>have clients say to me, why are you worried about

1:07:38.880 --> 1:07:43.920
<v Speaker 4>the angles and and this stuff? These these young kids

1:07:43.920 --> 1:07:46.840
<v Speaker 4>and our good players, they never even think about that.

1:07:47.680 --> 1:07:50.760
<v Speaker 4>And I say, well, I think we still should think

1:07:50.800 --> 1:07:54.240
<v Speaker 4>about it, and we should try to, you know, make

1:07:54.280 --> 1:07:57.000
<v Speaker 4>it a part of their game as much as it's

1:07:57.040 --> 1:08:01.760
<v Speaker 4>a part of players who don't hit it as far.

1:08:02.080 --> 1:08:06.760
<v Speaker 4>And I think the restoration thing is maybe refining itself

1:08:06.800 --> 1:08:13.200
<v Speaker 4>a little to either moving some bunkers down a fairway

1:08:13.280 --> 1:08:17.440
<v Speaker 4>so that the original intent of the design is recaptured,

1:08:18.160 --> 1:08:21.160
<v Speaker 4>or maybe adding a few more bunkers in the correct

1:08:21.240 --> 1:08:25.280
<v Speaker 4>style so the original intent, the intent of the original

1:08:25.280 --> 1:08:28.920
<v Speaker 4>design is captured. Because just if you think of it, andy,

1:08:29.520 --> 1:08:33.280
<v Speaker 4>just taking a plan or having an old aerial and

1:08:33.600 --> 1:08:37.679
<v Speaker 4>putting the bunkers back the fairway, bunkers back exactly where they.

1:08:37.600 --> 1:08:41.320
<v Speaker 2>Are, isn't Yeah, I had people.

1:08:41.400 --> 1:08:44.800
<v Speaker 4>I've had people say to me, are you really restoring

1:08:44.840 --> 1:08:47.439
<v Speaker 4>the intent of the original design? And I have to

1:08:47.640 --> 1:08:49.880
<v Speaker 4>I have to admit they make a good point.

1:08:50.600 --> 1:08:54.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's I agree with that because like the tents,

1:08:54.240 --> 1:08:56.960
<v Speaker 2>intent's been lost with a lot of the technology, so

1:08:57.040 --> 1:09:00.439
<v Speaker 2>you'd need to move bunkers into different places in order

1:09:00.479 --> 1:09:01.679
<v Speaker 2>to regain that intent.

1:09:02.880 --> 1:09:06.600
<v Speaker 4>And see, that's why I think that one of the

1:09:06.640 --> 1:09:11.960
<v Speaker 4>more important rules about design is sit down and breathe

1:09:12.000 --> 1:09:16.920
<v Speaker 4>deeply and think a little bit about it. Sometimes it's

1:09:17.040 --> 1:09:20.759
<v Speaker 4>right to put original bunkers back exactly where they were,

1:09:21.280 --> 1:09:28.480
<v Speaker 4>but to just stick on that goal probably doesn't restore

1:09:28.560 --> 1:09:33.200
<v Speaker 4>the original intent of play. Just like go into an

1:09:33.280 --> 1:09:36.720
<v Speaker 4>old course and saying, ah, this place is old, I'm

1:09:36.760 --> 1:09:41.120
<v Speaker 4>just going to do the modern thing here. That probably

1:09:41.240 --> 1:09:44.639
<v Speaker 4>is too quick of a knee jerk reaction, you know,

1:09:44.920 --> 1:09:48.599
<v Speaker 4>just like the players who need to think for that

1:09:48.720 --> 1:09:54.120
<v Speaker 4>five seconds we determined standing on a tee, the guys

1:09:54.160 --> 1:09:57.080
<v Speaker 4>with the pencils in their hands need to think for

1:09:57.520 --> 1:10:00.360
<v Speaker 4>a few minutes. Where does some of the original stuff

1:10:00.400 --> 1:10:04.720
<v Speaker 4>work in terms of bunker placement? And look, if I

1:10:05.439 --> 1:10:08.280
<v Speaker 4>could do a course a third and eighth a tenth

1:10:08.280 --> 1:10:10.200
<v Speaker 4>as good as any of the Golden Ages, I'd be

1:10:10.280 --> 1:10:13.360
<v Speaker 4>very proud of myself. But I don't think it's wrong

1:10:13.439 --> 1:10:17.439
<v Speaker 4>to say that original set of bunkers just doesn't work

1:10:17.479 --> 1:10:21.080
<v Speaker 4>for the modern game. Is there a net? And then

1:10:21.160 --> 1:10:24.519
<v Speaker 4>the job becomes how can I find a natural spot?

1:10:24.640 --> 1:10:27.040
<v Speaker 4>Because a lot of times they were placing their bunkers

1:10:27.400 --> 1:10:30.559
<v Speaker 4>in nice natural spots for bunkers where there were up

1:10:30.560 --> 1:10:32.559
<v Speaker 4>slopes where they could just cut a hole in the ground.

1:10:32.600 --> 1:10:35.040
<v Speaker 4>It became a good bunker. It didn't look artificial, It

1:10:35.080 --> 1:10:38.479
<v Speaker 4>looked like it's set into the landscape. Is there a

1:10:38.520 --> 1:10:44.599
<v Speaker 4>spot where I can recreate that same feel by putting

1:10:44.680 --> 1:10:47.800
<v Speaker 4>it into an upslope, whether the grade works or can

1:10:47.840 --> 1:10:51.960
<v Speaker 4>I build an up slope that when it's grassed people

1:10:52.000 --> 1:10:53.679
<v Speaker 4>will think it was always there.

1:10:54.479 --> 1:10:59.959
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I would that nothing looks better than natural bunkers.

1:11:00.560 --> 1:11:03.000
<v Speaker 2>And so we do this.

1:11:03.920 --> 1:11:06.800
<v Speaker 4>My test, my test for my guy and the bulldozer

1:11:07.240 --> 1:11:09.840
<v Speaker 4>is I just say to him and they laugh. Now

1:11:09.880 --> 1:11:13.200
<v Speaker 4>they're used to it, but I say, is that a

1:11:13.240 --> 1:11:19.400
<v Speaker 4>comfortable bunker? And I say, what do you mean? I said, well,

1:11:19.400 --> 1:11:21.839
<v Speaker 4>does that? And you know, you go to these courses

1:11:22.439 --> 1:11:27.240
<v Speaker 4>where bunkers have been added further down holes, or you

1:11:27.360 --> 1:11:30.639
<v Speaker 4>go to courses built in the sixties what I call

1:11:30.720 --> 1:11:34.920
<v Speaker 4>the age of golf course engineering rather than golf course architecture.

1:11:34.920 --> 1:11:38.120
<v Speaker 4>But it continues today. There are people who still follow

1:11:39.160 --> 1:11:43.200
<v Speaker 4>that inspiration of the sixties. They may disguise it by

1:11:43.280 --> 1:11:47.320
<v Speaker 4>ripping the edges of their bunkers, but they're still basically

1:11:47.439 --> 1:11:50.760
<v Speaker 4>sixties golf courses. You know, fade bunkers are all the

1:11:50.840 --> 1:11:54.040
<v Speaker 4>exact same distance from the tee. Hook bunkers are all

1:11:54.479 --> 1:11:59.160
<v Speaker 4>the exact same distance from the tee. And you'll see

1:11:59.160 --> 1:12:02.120
<v Speaker 4>some of these bunkers where they're built on a reverse slope.

1:12:02.320 --> 1:12:05.280
<v Speaker 4>That reverse slope just happened to be the right distance

1:12:05.280 --> 1:12:07.960
<v Speaker 4>from the tee. And you know, there's a berm that's

1:12:08.000 --> 1:12:12.240
<v Speaker 4>twelve feet high behind the bunker holding it up. Hopefully,

1:12:12.880 --> 1:12:16.439
<v Speaker 4>if you're working in a restorative manner, you can get

1:12:16.439 --> 1:12:19.280
<v Speaker 4>a comfortable bunker. Or I'll say to the guys, does

1:12:19.320 --> 1:12:23.360
<v Speaker 4>that bunker look like it's supposed to be there? I

1:12:23.400 --> 1:12:31.320
<v Speaker 4>think that's the other thing. It's not only put in

1:12:31.360 --> 1:12:36.439
<v Speaker 4>the bunker in the same spot that the Golden Ager

1:12:36.880 --> 1:12:39.680
<v Speaker 4>had it on the plan, or putting it in a

1:12:39.720 --> 1:12:43.880
<v Speaker 4>spot that has the same impact on the whole is

1:12:43.920 --> 1:12:49.879
<v Speaker 4>what the Golden Ager was thinking. It's can you detail

1:12:49.920 --> 1:12:52.559
<v Speaker 4>it so it looks like it's been there for a

1:12:52.600 --> 1:12:57.160
<v Speaker 4>long time and wasn't built three weeks ago last Tuesday?

1:12:57.600 --> 1:13:04.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, naturalness. So we have this segment that we wrap

1:13:05.000 --> 1:13:10.920
<v Speaker 2>up these podcasts with called Overrated, Underrated and all. We'll

1:13:10.920 --> 1:13:13.439
<v Speaker 2>give you a couple of topics and you just say

1:13:13.760 --> 1:13:16.720
<v Speaker 2>if you think that are overrated or underrated, and you

1:13:16.760 --> 1:13:19.320
<v Speaker 2>can give like a quick, short kind of.

1:13:20.920 --> 1:13:24.559
<v Speaker 4>Explanation as to your answer, Andy, you haven't been listening

1:13:24.600 --> 1:13:26.920
<v Speaker 4>if you think I can give a quick and short explanation.

1:13:27.000 --> 1:13:28.240
<v Speaker 4>But I'm gonna try my best.

1:13:28.680 --> 1:13:33.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's so Herbert Strong the architect.

1:13:35.800 --> 1:13:39.920
<v Speaker 4>Oh, I'll be honest with you. I'm gonna go in

1:13:40.000 --> 1:13:42.160
<v Speaker 4>between overrated and underrated.

1:13:42.320 --> 1:13:43.320
<v Speaker 2>You're going properly.

1:13:45.120 --> 1:13:48.759
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I would. I would just say he's an in between.

1:13:49.000 --> 1:13:52.599
<v Speaker 4>You know, That's what I think.

1:13:53.080 --> 1:14:02.960
<v Speaker 2>Okay, grass bunkers, I.

1:14:02.880 --> 1:14:10.800
<v Speaker 4>Think they're a little overrated. I have a lot I

1:14:10.840 --> 1:14:13.160
<v Speaker 4>have clubs. I have clubs that want to convert sand

1:14:13.200 --> 1:14:19.560
<v Speaker 4>bunkers into grass bunkers, and in most of the situations

1:14:19.560 --> 1:14:23.000
<v Speaker 4>where they want to do that, it's not an even

1:14:23.160 --> 1:14:31.000
<v Speaker 4>trade visually or strategically or helping players recognize the angles

1:14:31.720 --> 1:14:34.200
<v Speaker 4>and so forth. You know, there's been a lot of

1:14:34.280 --> 1:14:36.320
<v Speaker 4>I'm going to there's just one more paragraph. There's a

1:14:36.320 --> 1:14:39.160
<v Speaker 4>lot of talk about bunkers today, maintenance costs and all

1:14:39.240 --> 1:14:42.120
<v Speaker 4>that kind of stuff. But they're a part of golf,

1:14:42.880 --> 1:14:46.720
<v Speaker 4>and I'm not sure that everyone can be replaced by

1:14:46.760 --> 1:14:49.599
<v Speaker 4>either a tree or a grass bunker.

1:14:50.400 --> 1:14:54.719
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I would agree with that. I do like grass bunkers.

1:14:54.720 --> 1:14:57.840
<v Speaker 2>I think that are they're really tough for the good player,

1:14:57.880 --> 1:15:00.519
<v Speaker 2>and they're a little bit more playable than regular bunkers

1:15:00.560 --> 1:15:03.479
<v Speaker 2>for the average and beginner.

1:15:05.600 --> 1:15:10.719
<v Speaker 4>Yeah. I think it's just it they're positioning and maybe

1:15:10.760 --> 1:15:13.720
<v Speaker 4>they're part of a bunker group or something like that

1:15:13.920 --> 1:15:16.479
<v Speaker 4>is kind of an important thing to consider.

1:15:16.880 --> 1:15:20.679
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, So how about the blind t shot.

1:15:23.200 --> 1:15:32.920
<v Speaker 4>It's dramatically underrated. It makes me insane how the degree

1:15:32.920 --> 1:15:36.400
<v Speaker 4>to which they're rejected and considered a bad thing. And

1:15:36.439 --> 1:15:38.320
<v Speaker 4>I would say the same thing for the blind shot

1:15:38.360 --> 1:15:42.200
<v Speaker 4>to agree. It makes me crazy that they are so

1:15:42.400 --> 1:15:47.639
<v Speaker 4>rejected and disliked. It's a shot in golf. I got

1:15:47.680 --> 1:15:50.160
<v Speaker 4>to tell you Andy, when I reviewed. When I read

1:15:50.200 --> 1:15:54.680
<v Speaker 4>a review of a course that starts out with this

1:15:54.800 --> 1:15:57.040
<v Speaker 4>is a great course. Everything is right out in front

1:15:57.080 --> 1:16:00.479
<v Speaker 4>of you, I rarely finish the review. I never have

1:16:00.560 --> 1:16:02.160
<v Speaker 4>any interest in seeing that course.

1:16:03.400 --> 1:16:05.639
<v Speaker 2>You like to have a little bit of a thrill.

1:16:06.000 --> 1:16:11.360
<v Speaker 2>And there's that feel of a blind shot or rolling

1:16:11.439 --> 1:16:13.600
<v Speaker 2>up to like a punch bowl green that's blind on

1:16:13.720 --> 1:16:18.200
<v Speaker 2>an alpsole and wondering where your ball is that can't

1:16:18.200 --> 1:16:18.960
<v Speaker 2>be replaced.

1:16:20.040 --> 1:16:23.760
<v Speaker 4>No, tell me that. When you're walking and you hit

1:16:23.800 --> 1:16:26.479
<v Speaker 4>a shot to a blind green that's a punch bowl.

1:16:26.920 --> 1:16:29.200
<v Speaker 4>You don't throw the iron back in the bag and

1:16:29.240 --> 1:16:33.040
<v Speaker 4>then double time it up the hill. Yeah, Or if

1:16:33.080 --> 1:16:36.000
<v Speaker 4>you're forced to, you get in the cart and you

1:16:36.040 --> 1:16:40.040
<v Speaker 4>don't floor it to get around the corner. Two or

1:16:40.040 --> 1:16:41.960
<v Speaker 4>three years ago, four years ago, I went to southern

1:16:42.000 --> 1:16:45.519
<v Speaker 4>Scotland and I played a course called Nairn that has

1:16:45.560 --> 1:16:49.280
<v Speaker 4>about twenty blind shots. It is one of my five

1:16:49.400 --> 1:16:53.519
<v Speaker 4>favorite golf courses in the world. It was unbelievably great,

1:16:54.240 --> 1:16:58.200
<v Speaker 4>and I would think that most people would say, and

1:16:58.240 --> 1:17:04.080
<v Speaker 4>it's only because I love blind shots that that that

1:17:03.880 --> 1:17:06.720
<v Speaker 4>that's not a good thing. You know, you got to

1:17:06.760 --> 1:17:08.679
<v Speaker 4>love it. If it's a blind shot to a green,

1:17:09.520 --> 1:17:12.280
<v Speaker 4>more often than not, there's some degree of punch bowl

1:17:12.439 --> 1:17:16.439
<v Speaker 4>character to one side or all of the green, and

1:17:16.479 --> 1:17:19.479
<v Speaker 4>so a hack like me, I can miss the green

1:17:19.520 --> 1:17:23.559
<v Speaker 4>and it ends up twelve feet from the pins. See,

1:17:24.080 --> 1:17:28.320
<v Speaker 4>that's one thing that we've forgotten. Golf is supposed to

1:17:28.360 --> 1:17:32.519
<v Speaker 4>be fun, and I think blind shots are wicked fun.

1:17:34.000 --> 1:17:37.719
<v Speaker 2>It's yeah, I like blind shots.

1:17:37.960 --> 1:17:42.040
<v Speaker 4>I'm a fan, and I can't believe the percentage of

1:17:42.120 --> 1:17:44.720
<v Speaker 4>better drives I hit on a blind shot because I

1:17:44.760 --> 1:17:49.080
<v Speaker 4>have to concentrate. You're making yourself concentrate so much more

1:17:49.439 --> 1:17:54.160
<v Speaker 4>on somehow picking a line, And I would say, more

1:17:54.200 --> 1:17:56.360
<v Speaker 4>often than not, I hit one of my better drives

1:17:56.360 --> 1:18:00.599
<v Speaker 4>of the day because it's made me focus. There's nothing

1:18:00.640 --> 1:18:03.000
<v Speaker 4>wrong with something that makes you hit one of your

1:18:03.040 --> 1:18:04.080
<v Speaker 4>better drives of the day.

1:18:05.280 --> 1:18:14.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I agree. What about ocean and water views.

1:18:12.400 --> 1:18:15.480
<v Speaker 4>I think they could not be more spectacularly overrated.

1:18:17.320 --> 1:18:21.200
<v Speaker 2>I agree, I think they take they take away from

1:18:21.200 --> 1:18:25.760
<v Speaker 2>the architecture. They're awesome when combined with great architecture, but

1:18:26.640 --> 1:18:32.400
<v Speaker 2>they make average holes very perceived great.

1:18:34.360 --> 1:18:36.920
<v Speaker 4>Right before I take my last breath, somebody's gonna hand

1:18:36.920 --> 1:18:39.200
<v Speaker 4>me a piece of paper, and it's a rating of

1:18:39.240 --> 1:18:42.320
<v Speaker 4>pebble beach that got after the course got moved fifty

1:18:42.320 --> 1:18:43.880
<v Speaker 4>miles inland.

1:18:47.920 --> 1:18:48.880
<v Speaker 2>It wouldn't be as good.

1:18:48.960 --> 1:18:53.520
<v Speaker 4>Huh, Well, I would think it might be different. Yeah,

1:18:54.439 --> 1:18:58.960
<v Speaker 4>but I feel that way about you know, courses set

1:18:59.000 --> 1:19:02.320
<v Speaker 4>at the base of mountain, uh, set in sand dunes

1:19:02.360 --> 1:19:07.439
<v Speaker 4>and stuff like that. I And I know they can't

1:19:07.439 --> 1:19:09.559
<v Speaker 4>do it. I know they can't. I know it's too

1:19:09.600 --> 1:19:11.719
<v Speaker 4>hard to do. And I'm not even being a wise guy,

1:19:12.520 --> 1:19:14.320
<v Speaker 4>But if the raiders just looked at the tops of

1:19:14.360 --> 1:19:16.760
<v Speaker 4>the t's, the tops of the fairways, the tops of

1:19:16.760 --> 1:19:20.960
<v Speaker 4>the greens and the ankles, and the variety that they

1:19:21.360 --> 1:19:24.400
<v Speaker 4>introduced into the round of golf, I'd like to see

1:19:24.880 --> 1:19:28.240
<v Speaker 4>the ratings in those circumstances.

1:19:29.320 --> 1:19:34.040
<v Speaker 2>I'm curious. I played Fisher's Island in Chicago Golf in

1:19:34.640 --> 1:19:38.080
<v Speaker 2>a week span for the first time on each of them.

1:19:38.200 --> 1:19:39.639
<v Speaker 2>How would you compare the two of.

1:19:39.600 --> 1:19:47.960
<v Speaker 4>Those, Oh, I'm I. I don't like to directly compare. Ye,

1:19:48.840 --> 1:19:52.760
<v Speaker 4>And if if you were gonna, if you if you

1:19:52.880 --> 1:19:56.720
<v Speaker 4>told me that you were, how how did you want

1:19:56.760 --> 1:19:59.519
<v Speaker 4>to play golf at me, at my at my selection?

1:19:59.600 --> 1:20:02.760
<v Speaker 4>Out of the those two, I would tell you to

1:20:02.760 --> 1:20:03.679
<v Speaker 4>pick me up at O'Hare.

1:20:04.120 --> 1:20:08.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's why I feel the same. So I think,

1:20:08.240 --> 1:20:11.840
<v Speaker 2>like I always look at these courses and if I

1:20:11.880 --> 1:20:15.959
<v Speaker 2>have to compare, is like dividing, you know, dividing ten rounds.

1:20:16.040 --> 1:20:18.519
<v Speaker 2>How would I would divide ten rounds? And I've thought

1:20:18.520 --> 1:20:21.599
<v Speaker 2>about that one more than almost anyone. And I think

1:20:21.640 --> 1:20:27.240
<v Speaker 2>I'd go six or six four or seven three Chicago Golf.

1:20:28.960 --> 1:20:30.839
<v Speaker 4>I would just say, pick me up at O'Hare.

1:20:30.920 --> 1:20:38.120
<v Speaker 2>Andy, that place is one of the most architecturally sound

1:20:38.120 --> 1:20:41.800
<v Speaker 2>golf courses I've ever seen. Probably ever, it probably is

1:20:41.840 --> 1:20:42.720
<v Speaker 2>the most.

1:20:43.840 --> 1:20:47.160
<v Speaker 4>And and and when nuts like you and I say

1:20:47.200 --> 1:20:51.960
<v Speaker 4>things like that, we should say, and it's on a

1:20:52.080 --> 1:20:56.120
<v Speaker 4>non descript site, is that correct?

1:20:56.400 --> 1:20:58.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah? I think it. I think it's I think the

1:20:59.040 --> 1:21:03.200
<v Speaker 2>site that is on is underrated. I think people say

1:21:03.200 --> 1:21:06.120
<v Speaker 2>it's a bad site, but it's a pretty good site.

1:21:06.960 --> 1:21:10.920
<v Speaker 4>But you know, relative to these other world fare sites.

1:21:10.680 --> 1:21:15.640
<v Speaker 2>Andy, relative deficientcy Island. Yeah, that has water views on

1:21:15.680 --> 1:21:16.240
<v Speaker 2>every whole.

1:21:16.520 --> 1:21:21.559
<v Speaker 4>Yes, yes, yeah, yeah so. And that's another thing that

1:21:21.600 --> 1:21:24.719
<v Speaker 4>I find interesting is someone will go to a course,

1:21:24.920 --> 1:21:28.000
<v Speaker 4>well it's not much of a course, and I said, well,

1:21:28.040 --> 1:21:29.559
<v Speaker 4>what do you mean. He said, well, the site, it's

1:21:29.600 --> 1:21:34.920
<v Speaker 4>just flat. I think sin Andrew's a fairly strategic golf course.

1:21:36.200 --> 1:21:38.800
<v Speaker 4>There's nothing really special about that site. I think the

1:21:38.880 --> 1:21:42.400
<v Speaker 4>site is too often an easy excuse on flat land.

1:21:43.040 --> 1:21:46.160
<v Speaker 4>I honestly can't figure out why for Arda doesn't have

1:21:46.200 --> 1:21:47.719
<v Speaker 4>five hundred great golf courses.

1:21:49.200 --> 1:21:52.639
<v Speaker 2>Well. I think the thing I noticed is you can

1:21:52.680 --> 1:21:56.840
<v Speaker 2>really tell the skill of an architect with how they

1:21:57.200 --> 1:21:59.679
<v Speaker 2>what they do with flat land, like.

1:22:00.880 --> 1:22:05.400
<v Speaker 4>No doubt you. I won't try to say it better,

1:22:05.600 --> 1:22:08.960
<v Speaker 4>you just said it great. And I think too often

1:22:09.520 --> 1:22:14.480
<v Speaker 4>things like well the developer wanted this, well, the developer

1:22:14.600 --> 1:22:18.920
<v Speaker 4>wanted a hired penal golf course while the land was flat.

1:22:19.280 --> 1:22:25.280
<v Speaker 4>I just think sometimes they're excuses that are too convenient

1:22:27.040 --> 1:22:29.759
<v Speaker 4>because you're on a flat piece of land. These holes

1:22:29.760 --> 1:22:33.519
<v Speaker 4>I'm talking about at Shinnecock, they're unrelatively flat piece a

1:22:33.560 --> 1:22:37.360
<v Speaker 4>flat piece of land, and they're great golf courses because

1:22:37.400 --> 1:22:40.120
<v Speaker 4>they have the angles and the strategy. And in Florida

1:22:40.880 --> 1:22:43.920
<v Speaker 4>you could do any degree of angles, any amount of

1:22:43.960 --> 1:22:48.440
<v Speaker 4>sinewy fair way, the green angles could be anything. And basically,

1:22:48.800 --> 1:22:51.960
<v Speaker 4>what do you see. There's a fade bunker at a

1:22:51.960 --> 1:22:54.439
<v Speaker 4>certain distance, there's a hook bunker at a certain distance,

1:22:54.720 --> 1:22:56.880
<v Speaker 4>and then at the green there's a green or a

1:22:56.920 --> 1:23:01.559
<v Speaker 4>bunker at three o'clock, nine o'clock and twelve o'clock. Well,

1:23:01.680 --> 1:23:06.040
<v Speaker 4>they're just, they're just they're golf course engineering and not

1:23:06.160 --> 1:23:07.120
<v Speaker 4>golf course design.

1:23:07.960 --> 1:23:11.559
<v Speaker 2>It goes to your whole adage of when it was developed.

1:23:11.560 --> 1:23:15.240
<v Speaker 2>It was developed. Those courses were developed from nineteen fifty,

1:23:15.520 --> 1:23:19.639
<v Speaker 2>primarily nineteen fifty through nineteen ninety five.

1:23:22.240 --> 1:23:25.200
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, it was the age of golf course engineering.

1:23:24.840 --> 1:23:26.240
<v Speaker 2>Yep, not architecture.

1:23:26.640 --> 1:23:31.000
<v Speaker 4>So no, you could never you could never say that

1:23:31.080 --> 1:23:35.400
<v Speaker 4>it was. It was let's slap it in quick and

1:23:35.439 --> 1:23:36.880
<v Speaker 4>get to the next victim.

1:23:37.040 --> 1:23:42.439
<v Speaker 2>Yep. So, Brian, I really appreciate the time, and that

1:23:42.520 --> 1:23:44.160
<v Speaker 2>was a lot of fun. We'll have to do it

1:23:44.200 --> 1:23:47.479
<v Speaker 2>again sometime. I feel like we only touched on about

1:23:47.800 --> 1:23:50.000
<v Speaker 2>ten percent of the topics I wanted to get to.

1:23:51.160 --> 1:23:54.240
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, my answers that go on and on forever will

1:23:54.640 --> 1:23:56.800
<v Speaker 4>limit the amount of questions, so I'll just tell you

1:23:56.840 --> 1:23:59.840
<v Speaker 4>one thing. I'll be looking at that phone call to

1:24:00.000 --> 1:24:02.719
<v Speaker 4>telling me when I should get to O'Hare to play

1:24:02.760 --> 1:24:06.120
<v Speaker 4>the course I chose over the one that's on the island.

1:24:07.760 --> 1:24:10.439
<v Speaker 2>I'll be uh, I'll be trying to figure out when

1:24:10.439 --> 1:24:11.679
<v Speaker 2>I can get out there again.

1:24:13.640 --> 1:24:15.559
<v Speaker 4>All right, big guy, Hey, good talking to you. Thank you.