WEBVTT - Dynasty Superflex Startup Mock Draft: Win-Now vs. Productive Struggle Strategy & Expert Picks (Ep. 385) 0:00:00.600 --> 0:00:04.359 Hello everybody. Welcome into the Fantasy Pros Dynasty Football Podcast, 0:00:04.400 --> 0:00:07.240 brought to you by League Tycoon, the Dynasty first fantasy 0:00:07.240 --> 0:00:10.639 football platform. I'm Ryan Warmley, joined as always by Scott 0:00:10.680 --> 0:00:14.000 Bogman and Pat Fitzmorris, and as sometimes by Seth Wilcock. 0:00:14.000 --> 0:00:15.520 We've got a full show for you here. We are 0:00:15.560 --> 0:00:19.759 doing a Dynasty super Flex startup draft, a lot of 0:00:19.760 --> 0:00:23.160 the similar settings that we have usually on these shows. 0:00:23.320 --> 0:00:25.320 It is super flex. We're not going to be drafting 0:00:25.320 --> 0:00:27.720 a defense or a kicker. We've got an odd number 0:00:27.760 --> 0:00:29.080 of bench spots to make it so it's an even 0:00:29.120 --> 0:00:30.920 number of rounds. I forget the exact number I put, 0:00:30.960 --> 0:00:33.519 but generally a normal startup draft here, super flex free 0:00:33.560 --> 0:00:36.919 ride receivers, all that fun stuff. In case you want 0:00:36.920 --> 0:00:38.479 to kind of follow along as you're doing this. All 0:00:38.520 --> 0:00:41.279 of our twenty twenty six consensus rankings and tiers can 0:00:41.320 --> 0:00:43.640 be found at fantasypros dot com Slash rankings. You can 0:00:43.720 --> 0:00:46.600 navigate to the Dynasty rankings from there as well. Before 0:00:46.600 --> 0:00:48.080 we dive in, I just want to let everybody know 0:00:48.120 --> 0:00:51.360 that today's live Dynasty super Flex startup mock draft is 0:00:51.400 --> 0:00:54.200 done using our mock draft lobby over at fantasypros dot 0:00:54.240 --> 0:00:56.800 com slash draft Wizard. Just like you'll see today, our 0:00:56.840 --> 0:00:59.080 multi user drafts allow you to practice quick and fun 0:00:59.160 --> 0:01:02.480 mock drafts against both real and computer opponents using the 0:01:02.520 --> 0:01:05.320 same easy to use interface as our draft simulator. Join 0:01:05.360 --> 0:01:07.640 a public mock draft or create a private one for 0:01:07.680 --> 0:01:11.119 your friends over at fantasypros dot com slash draft Wizard. 0:01:11.120 --> 0:01:13.360 All right, that's enough preamble. It's a start up. We're 0:01:13.360 --> 0:01:14.959 going to dive right in as I get this thing 0:01:15.000 --> 0:01:16.520 going here. I think it'll be about a thirty second 0:01:16.560 --> 0:01:18.200 clock on each pick. Is I believe what I said 0:01:18.200 --> 0:01:22.200 it for. We are going to take some different approaches here. 0:01:22.280 --> 0:01:23.920 Since there's four of us, we're going to two to two. 0:01:23.959 --> 0:01:25.440 Two of us are going to go with sort of 0:01:25.440 --> 0:01:28.000 the productive struggle, willing to struggle a bit in year 0:01:28.040 --> 0:01:30.200 one for the long term view. The other two are 0:01:30.200 --> 0:01:32.679 going to take more of a win now approach. So 0:01:33.080 --> 0:01:36.480 I believe on the board it is Bogman has the 0:01:36.520 --> 0:01:39.160 first pick, not overall, but of the four of us. So, Bogman, 0:01:39.160 --> 0:01:40.440 what's your approach going to be today? 0:01:40.600 --> 0:01:42.640 I'm going to go win now like I typically do, 0:01:42.880 --> 0:01:44.920 and I'm going to take either Josh Allen or Drake 0:01:45.000 --> 0:01:46.560 May with that number two pick. 0:01:46.760 --> 0:01:49.080 Picking one oh two. There, Seth, you are picking sixth. 0:01:49.160 --> 0:01:50.200 What's your approach going to be? 0:01:50.720 --> 0:01:54.200 Yeah, Unfortunately, I'm just coming off releasing my top three 0:01:54.240 --> 0:01:58.040 hundred DEVI rankings, so I'm going to be taking Fits's 0:01:58.040 --> 0:01:59.919 approach and be a super agent. 0:02:00.200 --> 0:02:00.920 I'm going young. 0:02:01.240 --> 0:02:02.960 I don't care if I win in year one, but 0:02:03.200 --> 0:02:05.880 really try and take that approach where year two, year three, 0:02:05.920 --> 0:02:06.920 I'm certainly in the mix. 0:02:07.920 --> 0:02:09.680 Drake May does go one oh one here, a pick 0:02:09.760 --> 0:02:11.160 that I know Fitz would have been on board with. 0:02:11.200 --> 0:02:12.760 So Bogman, while you're on the clock here at one 0:02:12.840 --> 0:02:15.120 o two, I will ask Fitz, what is your approach 0:02:15.160 --> 0:02:15.840 going to be today? 0:02:16.120 --> 0:02:19.000 I'm playing against type or I'm going to force myself 0:02:19.000 --> 0:02:21.160 to go with a win now building. It's gonna be 0:02:21.160 --> 0:02:23.520 fun because it's not how I usually approach startups. 0:02:24.160 --> 0:02:26.240 So I will go with these second productive struggle here 0:02:26.280 --> 0:02:28.600 is so Seth and myself productive kind of makes sense. 0:02:28.600 --> 0:02:30.720 We're the younger guys on the show, so we're gonna. 0:02:30.480 --> 0:02:34.800 Bea and the Okay, Bob, you're you're you're closer to 0:02:34.840 --> 0:02:37.239 fits in age than us, Right, I have to assume yeah, yeah, 0:02:38.360 --> 0:02:40.520 uh so Bob with you so again, like I said, 0:02:40.560 --> 0:02:41.120 I'll be uh. 0:02:41.240 --> 0:02:43.880 I'm at the one twelve and the draft going to 0:02:43.880 --> 0:02:45.960 the productive struggle fits going with the win out one 0:02:46.000 --> 0:02:47.919 eleven will be interesting to see picking back to back 0:02:47.960 --> 0:02:50.280 with a different approach there so far, first three picks 0:02:50.360 --> 0:02:53.400 Drake May, Josh Allen, and Jade Daniels. No huge surprises there, 0:02:54.360 --> 0:02:56.640 seth at one oh six with the productive struggle. Who 0:02:56.720 --> 0:02:58.320 are you eyeing and hoping gets back to you? 0:02:59.120 --> 0:03:01.240 Yeah, I'll be on honest like, I'm thinking about maybe 0:03:01.240 --> 0:03:04.040 throwing a little wild card at this selection. I want 0:03:04.080 --> 0:03:07.600 to get that quarterback position really nailed down. So I'm 0:03:07.600 --> 0:03:10.240 honestly eyeballing Jackson Dart, but I know that you know 0:03:10.280 --> 0:03:12.720 it's technically a reach at this standpoint. So I think 0:03:12.760 --> 0:03:14.919 I'm gonna stay packed, and if some of these younger 0:03:14.960 --> 0:03:17.960 wide receivers like Puoka like JSN can fall down to me, 0:03:18.120 --> 0:03:19.919 I think that will probably be the move here in 0:03:19.960 --> 0:03:20.720 the first round for me. 0:03:22.240 --> 0:03:25.200 Jamar Chase going one oh four, Lamar one oh five. Interestingly, 0:03:25.240 --> 0:03:27.960 Fitz was just telling me that Lamar went one twelve 0:03:28.080 --> 0:03:31.160 in an actual startup draft he did recently, which makes 0:03:31.200 --> 0:03:33.560 me extremely jealous, as I have the one twelve here, 0:03:33.680 --> 0:03:36.320 so I missed that up by about seven spots here. 0:03:37.440 --> 0:03:40.880 So may Allen Daniels Chase lamar All off the board, 0:03:41.040 --> 0:03:43.480 seth on the clock and he goes with JSN so 0:03:43.680 --> 0:03:45.160 for going a quarterback. 0:03:45.880 --> 0:03:47.520 Yeah, it's kind of the move right here. 0:03:47.800 --> 0:03:49.680 I think there's a little bit of a tear break 0:03:49.720 --> 0:03:53.080 after these first couple younger quarterbacks have gone. I would 0:03:53.080 --> 0:03:54.880 have loved to get Drake May Jane Daniels if they 0:03:54.880 --> 0:03:56.640 were maybe in this vicinity. I think I can still 0:03:56.640 --> 0:03:58.960 get my QB one of the future in another round. 0:03:59.000 --> 0:04:01.480 So let's go ahead and find arguably who I think 0:04:01.640 --> 0:04:03.720 is one of the best wide receivers in the league. 0:04:03.760 --> 0:04:06.000 Always been underrated since his time out there in Columbus, 0:04:06.040 --> 0:04:08.200 and I think he'll continue to do good things in 0:04:08.200 --> 0:04:09.040 an offense that. 0:04:09.160 --> 0:04:10.400 Kind of devoid of playmakers. 0:04:10.400 --> 0:04:13.640 All of a sudden, Beijon, the first running back off 0:04:13.680 --> 0:04:16.160 the board goes one oh seven, Pukinakua one o eight. 0:04:16.240 --> 0:04:18.440 I'm in ros Saint Brown one oh nine. So only 0:04:18.520 --> 0:04:21.680 four quarterbacks off the board here in the first nine picks. 0:04:21.839 --> 0:04:24.800 That feels fairly unusual for a super flex draft. I'm 0:04:24.839 --> 0:04:27.960 surprised to see that Jamiir Gibbs goes one ten. So 0:04:28.040 --> 0:04:31.839 four of the first ten were we're quarterbacks. That is 0:04:31.920 --> 0:04:34.320 a very low number in my experience. Fits here on 0:04:34.320 --> 0:04:35.880 the clock here at one eleven, are you going quarterback? 0:04:35.880 --> 0:04:36.920 Because so many of them are falling? 0:04:38.480 --> 0:04:39.800 Yeah, I'm thinking about that. 0:04:40.320 --> 0:04:44.520 I am gonna wait, and I'm gonna take. 0:04:46.320 --> 0:04:47.440 Justin Jefferson first. 0:04:47.520 --> 0:04:49.120 Nice, woh, it's good. 0:04:49.240 --> 0:04:51.839 Yeah. I think it's gonna be a lot better this 0:04:51.920 --> 0:04:54.719 year with a quarterback who's not named JJ McCarthy. And 0:04:54.760 --> 0:04:57.880 it was nice that we just saw Kevin O'Connell completely 0:04:58.120 --> 0:05:01.159 throw JJ McCarthy under the bus this year and talk 0:05:01.200 --> 0:05:03.760 about how he expected the offense to get going and 0:05:04.200 --> 0:05:08.120 Jefferson to get untracked with good quarterbacking this year. 0:05:08.040 --> 0:05:10.880 Or so at one twelve, I was planning on not 0:05:11.040 --> 0:05:14.120 taking two quarterbacks, mate, like at least was only gonna 0:05:14.120 --> 0:05:16.279 take one, But so many of them fell that I 0:05:16.279 --> 0:05:18.760 feel like, even that I'm leaning into the productive struggle, 0:05:19.160 --> 0:05:21.760 two quarterbacks who are not that old are still going 0:05:21.839 --> 0:05:24.640 to be kind of fit any strategy you want here. 0:05:24.800 --> 0:05:26.400 So I'm just gonna go back to back Burrow and 0:05:26.440 --> 0:05:29.279 Caleb and just be very happy with my quarterbacks you're 0:05:29.320 --> 0:05:32.000 going forward. I don't usually do two. If I'm picking 0:05:32.000 --> 0:05:35.000 towards the end, it's usually one in one. Herbert was 0:05:35.040 --> 0:05:36.440 the other guy I considered, who just goes to you 0:05:36.520 --> 0:05:38.039 fits here. I was going to pick two of those 0:05:38.080 --> 0:05:40.200 three with them all getting there, and I ended up 0:05:40.200 --> 0:05:42.120 going with Burrow and Caleb, just the higher rank of 0:05:42.120 --> 0:05:45.000 the two. I do love Herbert as well, but kind 0:05:45.000 --> 0:05:47.039 of an easy when that level of quarterbacks are getting 0:05:47.040 --> 0:05:48.240 back to you in a super flex. I don't feel 0:05:48.279 --> 0:05:50.760 bad about it at all. Fits. Were you hoping Herbert 0:05:50.800 --> 0:05:52.080 was one who would get back to you? Or were 0:05:52.080 --> 0:05:53.240 you eyeing Burrow or Caleb? 0:05:53.640 --> 0:05:54.760 Honestly, I didn't care. 0:05:54.800 --> 0:05:57.800 I would have ranked them Caleb, Herbert, Spurrow, but I 0:05:57.880 --> 0:06:00.640 was taking whichever one of those three fell. I feel 0:06:00.640 --> 0:06:02.679 like when you're on an end like this, you kind 0:06:02.680 --> 0:06:05.280 of have to knock out one of the quarterbacks at 0:06:05.320 --> 0:06:06.640 the start of a superflex. 0:06:07.520 --> 0:06:10.000 Well, Chewbacca disagrees. He started with the one to ten 0:06:10.040 --> 0:06:12.000 and he goes Jumior, Gibbs and Seed Lamb, So he's 0:06:12.040 --> 0:06:14.359 not taking a quarterback with one of these at the 0:06:14.400 --> 0:06:17.480 back end here. Yeah, I adore Herbert. You know that, 0:06:17.680 --> 0:06:19.480 you know very well. I talk about him a lot, 0:06:19.520 --> 0:06:21.919 so I considered him instead of the Borough pick. I 0:06:21.960 --> 0:06:24.760 was gonna take Caleb regardless, like I said, I don't 0:06:24.800 --> 0:06:26.360 usually take Burrow, so kind of mixing it up here. 0:06:26.360 --> 0:06:28.520 He felt like one twelve was a steal. There two 0:06:28.520 --> 0:06:31.520 more non quarterbacks going Ashton Genty, Milik Neighbors, so a 0:06:31.560 --> 0:06:33.400 handful of teams in the back half of the first 0:06:33.520 --> 0:06:35.679 not going with quarterback Bogwin. What do you think seeing 0:06:35.839 --> 0:06:37.800 these different approaches so far in the back half of 0:06:37.839 --> 0:06:39.280 the first I think. 0:06:39.200 --> 0:06:41.120 A lot of people are depending on the quarterback class 0:06:41.160 --> 0:06:43.560 for next year, a little bit like for maybe one 0:06:43.560 --> 0:06:45.600 of their long term future quarterbacks. It feels like a 0:06:45.600 --> 0:06:48.280 lot of people are playing for the productive struggle here, 0:06:48.320 --> 0:06:51.880 which helps fits and eye for the win now I 0:06:51.960 --> 0:06:54.880 feel so I'm kind of liking that. I mean, Seth, 0:06:54.920 --> 0:06:58.279 you're considering taking Dart with that first pick. He's still 0:06:58.320 --> 0:06:59.000 on the board here. 0:06:59.680 --> 0:07:01.560 Yeah, I feel really good about that. I think that's 0:07:01.600 --> 0:07:03.200 gonna be the way I go here at the two 0:07:03.200 --> 0:07:06.000 pH seven. I would love to grab one of these 0:07:06.120 --> 0:07:08.359 RB ones that have kind of fallen into this tier. 0:07:08.640 --> 0:07:11.080 Ashton Genty was someone I was kind of hiving in 0:07:11.160 --> 0:07:14.760 my queue, but ultimately he didn't get to me. Jeremiah 0:07:14.800 --> 0:07:17.360 Love just a little too much volatility there, I think 0:07:17.440 --> 0:07:20.200 in year number one with that, you know, overall disappointing 0:07:20.240 --> 0:07:22.520 Arizona offense we're likely going to see. So yeah, I 0:07:22.560 --> 0:07:25.400 love getting Jackson Dart, just a young mobile quarterback who 0:07:25.480 --> 0:07:27.760 I think will fill out the stat sheet very nicely. 0:07:27.840 --> 0:07:28.760 Here in New York. 0:07:29.640 --> 0:07:32.400 A couple more quarterbacks go off the board here, Mahomes 0:07:32.440 --> 0:07:35.240 and Hurts. So we're back to Bogman, who I started 0:07:35.280 --> 0:07:38.440 his team with Josh Allen and now has his pick 0:07:38.480 --> 0:07:39.800 of where everyon wants to go next. 0:07:39.800 --> 0:07:42.160 What are you thinking, Bucks, I'll go Tee Law here, 0:07:43.200 --> 0:07:46.200 you know, looking at the skilled position players, I like 0:07:46.280 --> 0:07:49.280 pick Ins, like Bowers. There's two picks in between me. 0:07:49.360 --> 0:07:51.920 I just hope one of those guys falls back from 0:07:51.920 --> 0:07:58.119 bunting Ted there. Yeah, he and he took Brock, which 0:07:58.240 --> 0:08:01.120 is not surprising, But I will take George Pickens here. 0:08:01.480 --> 0:08:04.280 We've seen Bowers go at that end of that two 0:08:04.320 --> 0:08:06.600 to three turn in a couple of these startup monocks 0:08:06.640 --> 0:08:08.480 before that. Feels like a really nice place to get 0:08:08.560 --> 0:08:11.200 quarterback at the top. Then Bowers and then just hammer 0:08:11.280 --> 0:08:16.800 other positions from there. Oh, I love almost getting back 0:08:16.840 --> 0:08:18.920 to Seth. Here goes one pick before by the way, 0:08:18.920 --> 0:08:21.880 pickens a Chan Purdy and love the last four picks 0:08:21.880 --> 0:08:23.920 while Seth considers his next pick. I want to let 0:08:23.920 --> 0:08:26.640 everybody know that if you play in a serious dynasty league, 0:08:26.680 --> 0:08:29.679 you should check out League Tycoon, the official dynasty football 0:08:29.680 --> 0:08:32.760 sponsor of the Fantasy Pros Dynasty Podcast. It's a modern 0:08:32.800 --> 0:08:36.760 fantasy football platform built specifically for dynasty leagues not redraft. 0:08:36.800 --> 0:08:39.960 Standard Dynasty leagues on League Tycoon are completely free. League 0:08:40.000 --> 0:08:43.319 Tycoon has tools for serious dynasty leagues, slow auction drafts 0:08:43.320 --> 0:08:46.120 with twenty plus players at once, trade auctions, draft lotteries, 0:08:46.160 --> 0:08:49.199 compensatory picks, and league history import with no ads or 0:08:49.240 --> 0:08:51.959 sportsbook clutter. And if your league wants to go even deeper, 0:08:52.040 --> 0:08:56.319 League Tycoon also offers contract dynasty with multi year contracts, extensions, 0:08:56.400 --> 0:08:59.920 rookie deals, tags, and restricted free agency tenders. Standard Dynasty 0:09:00.120 --> 0:09:02.920 is free for everyone and for contract dynasty leagues. Use 0:09:02.960 --> 0:09:05.640 promo code pros to get your first season free. Start 0:09:05.640 --> 0:09:08.320 your free dynasty league today at League tycoon dot com 0:09:08.360 --> 0:09:10.840 and for contract dynasty leagues that's promo Code Pros to 0:09:10.840 --> 0:09:13.880 get your first season free league Tycoon, the official Dynasty 0:09:13.880 --> 0:09:17.719 Football sponsor of the Fantasy Pros Dynasty podcast. All right, 0:09:17.760 --> 0:09:19.080 Seth walking me through your pick? 0:09:19.720 --> 0:09:21.440 Yeah, I mean for me, I felt like I was 0:09:21.480 --> 0:09:23.040 kind of at the end of a tier break here. 0:09:23.280 --> 0:09:25.640 Would have love to get a Chan or Jeremiah Love 0:09:25.760 --> 0:09:27.200 lockdown that RB one position. 0:09:27.240 --> 0:09:29.160 A Mecca Buka ended up being the pick, though. 0:09:29.440 --> 0:09:32.040 I just want a young wide receiver who might be 0:09:32.080 --> 0:09:34.040 young in age, but I mean talk about a guy 0:09:34.080 --> 0:09:36.760 who is well ahead of his years infar as being 0:09:36.800 --> 0:09:40.079 a pro doing all the right things, whether it's run blocking, 0:09:40.120 --> 0:09:42.200 whether it's just making sure he's coming down with the 0:09:42.240 --> 0:09:44.360 catch before he takes off and runs with it. 0:09:44.400 --> 0:09:45.920 So I think a Mecca Abuka, the. 0:09:45.880 --> 0:09:48.400 Clear wide receiver one in Tampa Bay moving forward, feels 0:09:48.440 --> 0:09:50.880 like a good, you know one b to have on 0:09:50.960 --> 0:09:53.560 my team right behind JSN there at the wide receiver position. 0:09:54.640 --> 0:09:56.400 I was hoping Loveland was gonna get to me. He 0:09:56.400 --> 0:09:58.439 goes one pick before fits Fits. Were you gonna take 0:09:58.480 --> 0:10:00.680 Loveland because I know you like him lot too, or 0:10:00.679 --> 0:10:01.679 were you going to go quarterback? 0:10:01.720 --> 0:10:04.839 Regardless, I probably would have taken Love London come back 0:10:04.840 --> 0:10:05.679 with a quarterback. 0:10:08.880 --> 0:10:10.360 All right, I'm on the clock here. I forgot we 0:10:10.400 --> 0:10:12.480 had short clocks here. I will take cardinal tape because 0:10:12.480 --> 0:10:16.559 I'm leaning into the production struggle here. Talented young player, 0:10:16.600 --> 0:10:18.760 obviously little you know, have a youth on my side, 0:10:19.640 --> 0:10:21.480 you know. McBride is somebody would consider if I was taking 0:10:21.480 --> 0:10:22.920 a different approach. He feels like more of a win 0:10:23.000 --> 0:10:26.520 now player, not that he's old, but obviously coming off 0:10:26.520 --> 0:10:30.280 the great year. Looking at who else I want, there's 0:10:30.360 --> 0:10:32.680 there's a lot of age available here, actually. 0:10:34.280 --> 0:10:35.600 Him and hauling worm. 0:10:36.040 --> 0:10:39.319 Well seconds, I'll go with lad McConkey here. You know, 0:10:39.360 --> 0:10:41.640 thirty year player. I think I think the first year 0:10:41.679 --> 0:10:44.080 is closer to his reality than the second year was. 0:10:44.080 --> 0:10:45.400 I'm really excited about what he's going to look like 0:10:45.440 --> 0:10:48.000 in a Mike McDaniel offense. Uh And since I didn't 0:10:48.000 --> 0:10:49.920 take any receivers with my first two picks, I'm happy 0:10:49.920 --> 0:10:51.679 to get a couple here, considering this is a three 0:10:51.720 --> 0:10:55.160 receiver league. Fits on the clock now, I'll let I'll 0:10:55.240 --> 0:10:56.800 let you think about this unless you already know who 0:10:56.800 --> 0:10:57.280 you're taking. 0:10:57.800 --> 0:11:02.360 Not sure I'm about to grab someone. I'm actually gonna 0:11:02.360 --> 0:11:08.640 take Trey McBride not normally, but yeah, I uh, early fourth, 0:11:09.200 --> 0:11:11.640 I think there's decent value there. I know he's gonna 0:11:11.640 --> 0:11:13.520 fall off this here, but it's not gonna be a 0:11:13.559 --> 0:11:15.480 total collapse. I still think he's gonna be good for 0:11:15.520 --> 0:11:16.520 about eighty catches. 0:11:17.440 --> 0:11:19.880 I was surprised fits that you took love with the 0:11:19.920 --> 0:11:22.439 first of your picks rather than the second of your picks, 0:11:22.440 --> 0:11:25.400 considering I already had two quarterbacks, probably taking a third. 0:11:25.440 --> 0:11:27.160 Yeah, I just looked at that too late. 0:11:27.440 --> 0:11:29.360 I did not, and I did the same thing with Bowers. 0:11:29.400 --> 0:11:31.520 I probably should have gone Bowers instead of Tea Law 0:11:31.559 --> 0:11:33.200 and then sawt te Law fell back. 0:11:34.360 --> 0:11:36.040 Yeah, so that's why it's a mock. 0:11:36.679 --> 0:11:39.280 Yeah, it's also mack with thirty seconds, so unlike most 0:11:39.320 --> 0:11:41.080 startup for you have a bit more time here. 0:11:41.640 --> 0:11:41.760 Uh. 0:11:41.960 --> 0:11:44.120 Plus we're trying to you know, chat about this as well. 0:11:44.200 --> 0:11:47.040 So uh yeah, McBride, Dak Prescott, go's next, James Cook, 0:11:47.080 --> 0:11:49.679 Chris Olave, aj Brown bringing us back to Seth who 0:11:49.760 --> 0:11:53.120 started with JSN, Jackson Dart and ameca Igbuca. So two 0:11:53.160 --> 0:11:55.320 receivers and quarterback. What are you thinking now? 0:11:56.040 --> 0:11:57.959 Yeah, you know, I think my decision has been pretty 0:11:57.960 --> 0:11:59.959 made for me. Where we are in the tight end land, 0:12:00.600 --> 0:12:03.880 I gotta go with my guy, Tyler Warren. Former Penn 0:12:03.880 --> 0:12:06.719 State Nitneelyon. I think we really just saw like the 0:12:06.760 --> 0:12:08.680 tip of the iceberg for Tyler Warren. I mean we 0:12:08.679 --> 0:12:11.200 were talking probably halfway through the season a year ago 0:12:11.240 --> 0:12:13.840 where he was a top three tight end. Obviously fell 0:12:13.840 --> 0:12:16.280 off when old man Philip Rivers was there at the Helm, 0:12:16.320 --> 0:12:18.640 But I think if we can figure out that quarterbabback 0:12:18.640 --> 0:12:20.839 position in the next couple of years in Indianapolis, He's 0:12:20.880 --> 0:12:23.160 a long term dynasty asset that I want to have, 0:12:23.240 --> 0:12:25.360 and I really feel good about kind of locking up 0:12:25.360 --> 0:12:28.360 that position long term. 0:12:28.360 --> 0:12:30.800 Garrett Wilson, Kenneth Walker, Breese Hall the next picks off 0:12:30.800 --> 0:12:32.680 the board, and then Bogman takes burd In. I know 0:12:32.760 --> 0:12:35.040 Fitz was hoping Burden would get back to his next 0:12:35.080 --> 0:12:37.520 pick with how hi he has him ranked. Was that 0:12:37.520 --> 0:12:39.160 an easy pick for you, bog Man or was anybody 0:12:39.160 --> 0:12:40.000 else you were considering? 0:12:40.200 --> 0:12:40.360 Yeah? 0:12:40.400 --> 0:12:44.559 I wanted Tyler Warren so upset that Tyler Warren went, 0:12:44.640 --> 0:12:47.920 But Luther Burton is a nice Constellation prize here, and 0:12:47.960 --> 0:12:51.120 then I'm I need a running back now, so I'm 0:12:51.240 --> 0:12:52.880 my next pick is definitely gonna be an RB. 0:12:53.600 --> 0:12:55.800 Mendoza goes next Fits. What do you think about Mendoz 0:12:55.800 --> 0:12:57.319 as a fourth round pick in a startup? 0:12:57.640 --> 0:12:59.320 Yeah, I think that's a good spot for him. 0:12:59.520 --> 0:13:02.360 And I'm trying to think of where he went in 0:13:02.400 --> 0:13:05.760 our most recent the startup I'm in the middle of now. 0:13:05.800 --> 0:13:07.800 He might have gone a little bit later than that, 0:13:07.920 --> 0:13:09.800 but I think it's solid. I mean, I think he's 0:13:09.800 --> 0:13:11.840 gonna be no worse than a league average starter, so 0:13:12.960 --> 0:13:14.959 fine value Tyson. 0:13:15.040 --> 0:13:18.440 Then Treyvon Henderson goes next to Bogwin's two picks. I'm 0:13:18.480 --> 0:13:20.760 sure two Fits would have loved Burden and Henderson. Two 0:13:20.800 --> 0:13:23.480 of his favorites, DeVante Smith and s A. Flowers go 0:13:23.559 --> 0:13:27.079 off the board next kind of four picks in you 0:13:27.120 --> 0:13:29.079 ignore the first part of round five because not everybody's 0:13:29.080 --> 0:13:30.320 made a pick yet, But as far as the first 0:13:30.360 --> 0:13:33.200 four sort of foundational pieces, do you guys have a 0:13:33.480 --> 0:13:35.640 team start that you like the best? You know, it 0:13:35.640 --> 0:13:38.400 could be yours, it could be someone else's, one of ours, 0:13:38.440 --> 0:13:40.720 one of the you know the listeners are drafting against, 0:13:40.720 --> 0:13:42.640 they stand out to any of you, guys. 0:13:43.280 --> 0:13:47.240 Bunting's off to a pretty good start with a builts 0:13:47.280 --> 0:13:52.280 for youth but man, I mean Drake may Brock, Powers, Teterow, McMillan, 0:13:52.800 --> 0:13:55.280 like that is a dream one two three starts for 0:13:55.360 --> 0:13:57.120 a dynasty team, I think. 0:13:57.080 --> 0:13:59.960 And pairs Bowers with his quarterback of the future in Mendoz, 0:14:00.440 --> 0:14:04.000 right right, Yeah, I like that for sure. That's a 0:14:04.000 --> 0:14:06.800 good productive struggle that might not even be that much 0:14:06.840 --> 0:14:08.800 of a struggle, right right. You also have this elite 0:14:08.920 --> 0:14:10.120 quarterback in tight end combo. 0:14:10.480 --> 0:14:13.000 Even a side of the youth that's a winning year 0:14:13.040 --> 0:14:13.920 two team. I think. 0:14:14.280 --> 0:14:17.960 Yeah, I was considering Judkins here Seth with my next pick, 0:14:18.000 --> 0:14:19.440 So I think that's a nice one. You just made 0:14:19.440 --> 0:14:21.680 it five oh six? Was he you know you? Was 0:14:21.680 --> 0:14:23.080 it that you wanted to go and getting a running 0:14:23.080 --> 0:14:24.720 back with this pick regardless or was he just your 0:14:24.720 --> 0:14:26.320 favorite player on the board at any position? 0:14:27.000 --> 0:14:27.280 Yeah. 0:14:27.440 --> 0:14:29.320 A lot of the wide receivers that kind of went 0:14:29.360 --> 0:14:31.800 early in this round, Devon to Smith, Jordan Tyson that 0:14:31.880 --> 0:14:34.640 kind of fit this productive struggle type of mode. 0:14:35.160 --> 0:14:37.160 They end up going off the board. I did need 0:14:37.200 --> 0:14:37.840 a running back. 0:14:37.840 --> 0:14:39.960 There are a couple of younger ones from that same 0:14:40.000 --> 0:14:42.280 twenty twenty five class I was eyeing. I think Judkins 0:14:42.360 --> 0:14:45.160 though in for a big year under a guy in 0:14:45.240 --> 0:14:47.840 Todd Munkin who he didn't mind running Derek Henry in 0:14:47.960 --> 0:14:49.440 the ground last couple years. I think we get the 0:14:49.440 --> 0:14:52.040 same type production from Judkins up there along the shores 0:14:52.040 --> 0:14:52.560 of the lake Erie. 0:14:53.560 --> 0:14:55.680 I was hoping for Roemadoonsa. He goes to the five 0:14:55.760 --> 0:14:58.840 h nine, nice pick by sling shot here Rashid Rice, 0:14:58.920 --> 0:15:02.080 Chase Brown, T Higgins also off the board, fits on 0:15:02.120 --> 0:15:02.520 the clock. 0:15:02.600 --> 0:15:07.560 Now, yeah, all right, I'm gonna take Jalen Waddle. 0:15:08.000 --> 0:15:08.200 Mmm. 0:15:09.040 --> 0:15:12.000 I think he's gonna have a good year still. Like now, 0:15:12.040 --> 0:15:15.200 he's kind of squarely in his prime. I just think 0:15:15.320 --> 0:15:17.040 he's a guy who can produce kind of no matter 0:15:17.080 --> 0:15:19.040 what the role is. We saw him like succeed as 0:15:19.080 --> 0:15:21.640 a short area receiver early in his career. We saw 0:15:21.720 --> 0:15:26.440 him exceed succeed as sort of a designated lidlifter in 0:15:26.680 --> 0:15:30.000 his next couple of years. And I'm excited to see 0:15:30.000 --> 0:15:31.440 what it's gonna look like in Denver. 0:15:32.800 --> 0:15:35.640 I'm taking Marvin Harrison Junior, leading into the struggle part 0:15:35.640 --> 0:15:41.000 of productive struggle, but hopefully buying on upside here and 0:15:41.360 --> 0:15:43.440 bounce back. Now that Kyler Murray is not the permanent 0:15:43.520 --> 0:15:46.320 quarterback and the I'm gonna take Tucker Kraft, who obviously 0:15:46.400 --> 0:15:48.640 like had this breakout season last year that got cut 0:15:48.640 --> 0:15:50.960 short by injury. So if he comes back slower from 0:15:50.960 --> 0:15:53.280 the injury, that won't bother me as somebody who's willing 0:15:53.280 --> 0:15:54.640 to kind of play for a year or two here. 0:15:54.960 --> 0:15:57.440 But the talent is great, and he was barreling towards 0:15:57.480 --> 0:15:59.360 a Tier one tight end in Dynasty if he had 0:15:59.440 --> 0:16:01.440 kind of finished the season the way he started when 0:16:01.440 --> 0:16:04.080 he was healthy. So I'm betting on the talent here 0:16:04.320 --> 0:16:06.600 and the offense in general in Green Bay, and I 0:16:06.600 --> 0:16:07.920 didn't have a tight end yet, and I wanted to 0:16:07.920 --> 0:16:10.280 get a good one who was still young. He's only 0:16:10.280 --> 0:16:12.960 twenty five. So Harrison and Kraft my two picks here 0:16:13.280 --> 0:16:15.160 fits you were on the clock with the six h two, 0:16:15.200 --> 0:16:16.120 and take Bucky Irving. 0:16:16.520 --> 0:16:17.800 I think he's gonna have a good year. 0:16:18.200 --> 0:16:22.240 I don't think Kenny Gainwell is going to take away 0:16:22.360 --> 0:16:25.400 significant work from him. I mean, Bucky averaged better than 0:16:25.400 --> 0:16:27.320 twenty touches a game last year in a bad year, 0:16:27.760 --> 0:16:29.480 and I think he's going to be more like the 0:16:29.520 --> 0:16:32.080 Buckie we saw down the stretch in his rookie season. 0:16:32.280 --> 0:16:34.080 And I just even though I'm supposed to be the 0:16:34.080 --> 0:16:36.680 win now guy in this draft. I just couldn't take 0:16:36.800 --> 0:16:40.720 Christian McCaffery or sick one barklay an old running back 0:16:40.800 --> 0:16:44.080 at the top of round six. I just I want 0:16:44.080 --> 0:16:45.880 to win now, but I also don't want to totally 0:16:45.920 --> 0:16:48.440 punt away future chances of winning. 0:16:49.040 --> 0:16:51.680 So if it's not quite able to go fully against 0:16:51.720 --> 0:16:56.280