Speaker 1: In two thousand and six, al Gore released his freight
Speaker 1: movie and Inconvenient Truth. He warned that unless we adopted
Speaker 1: a slew of draconian and expensive measures to reverse global warming,
Speaker 1: we would face a true planetary emergency in ten years.
Speaker 1: Al Gore's movie was mandatory viewing in many schools, and
Speaker 1: it was pivotal in spreading the global warming hooks. Ten
Speaker 1: years have come and gone, and we're still here. The
Speaker 1: true planetary emergency turned out to be totally fake. Does
Speaker 1: that matter to other alarmists? Nope, not at all. Last weekend,
Speaker 1: the famous physicist Stephen Hawking, smartest man in the world
Speaker 1: next to Bill Gates, issued his own doomsday scenario, which,
Speaker 1: like al Gore's, was all politics and zero science. Professor
Speaker 1: Hawking claimed that Trump's withdraw from the Paris Accords pushed
Speaker 1: the planet toward irreversible global warming. Hawking predicts temperatures on
Speaker 1: Earth will rival Venus starring the four hundred twenty eight degrees.
Speaker 1: Blame ming Trump for the imminent end to human life.
Speaker 1: Sounds ridiculous to normal people, but not to those blinded
Speaker 1: by liberalism. Last month, Professor Hawking ac hughes Trump of
Speaker 1: being a demagogue. He said that he's afraid he wouldn't
Speaker 1: be welcome in Trump's America. False and false. Good science
Speaker 1: relies on evidence, and we get plenty. Doomsday predictions about
Speaker 1: global warming have been proven wrong. There's not a one
Speaker 1: of them that's come true. But you always draw the
Speaker 1: wrong conclusions when you inject liberalism into the equation. Is
Speaker 1: serious about that? This has most absurd