WEBVTT - Free Picks for EVERY Week 14 NFL Game (Ep. 399)

0:00:01.040 --> 0:00:03.280
<v Speaker 1>Welcome in, everybody to betting pros. It's time to place

0:00:03.320 --> 0:00:06.080
<v Speaker 1>your bets. This be Joey Pai, Joe Pisa, Pia, and

0:00:06.160 --> 0:00:09.240
<v Speaker 1>it's week fourteen. I can't even believe it. It's time is

0:00:09.280 --> 0:00:11.320
<v Speaker 1>flying when you're having fun, and I'm having a good

0:00:11.320 --> 0:00:13.080
<v Speaker 1>time here every single week I'm betting pros with all

0:00:13.160 --> 0:00:15.560
<v Speaker 1>of you who listen and watch on our YouTube channel.

0:00:15.640 --> 0:00:18.000
<v Speaker 1>Of course, my good friends Patty Cakes, Pat fitz Morris

0:00:18.200 --> 0:00:20.840
<v Speaker 1>and Sam Hoppin, who's always got the bets popping. Because

0:00:20.840 --> 0:00:23.279
<v Speaker 1>this guy and Pat they are in a good mood

0:00:23.280 --> 0:00:25.560
<v Speaker 1>this morning. They stayed up all night last night partying

0:00:25.600 --> 0:00:28.240
<v Speaker 1>after that big Green Bay Packer win against the Kansas

0:00:28.280 --> 0:00:30.880
<v Speaker 1>City Chiefs. They are on a roll. They're beating the Chiefs,

0:00:30.920 --> 0:00:34.000
<v Speaker 1>they're beating the Lions. Sam Hoppin, what's it feel like

0:00:34.040 --> 0:00:35.000
<v Speaker 1>to be a playoff team?

0:00:35.120 --> 0:00:38.800
<v Speaker 2>Huh, it feels great. I was kind of on this

0:00:38.880 --> 0:00:41.559
<v Speaker 2>team a couple of weeks ago, like when they were

0:00:41.600 --> 0:00:45.519
<v Speaker 2>going through their slump. But man, they they've got me excited.

0:00:45.520 --> 0:00:49.639
<v Speaker 2>They're playing super well. I mean, even if even if

0:00:49.680 --> 0:00:51.360
<v Speaker 2>things don't you know, I mean, I don't think they're

0:00:51.360 --> 0:00:54.160
<v Speaker 2>gonna win the super Bowl this year, but The fact

0:00:54.160 --> 0:00:56.600
<v Speaker 2>that they're playing this well with this many young players,

0:00:56.640 --> 0:01:01.280
<v Speaker 2>I think is huge, and it shows that as they've

0:01:01.960 --> 0:01:05.959
<v Speaker 2>gotten better throughout the season, they're improving, they're developing, all

0:01:05.959 --> 0:01:08.240
<v Speaker 2>that sort of stuff. It makes me very, very excited

0:01:08.280 --> 0:01:08.840
<v Speaker 2>for the future.

0:01:09.760 --> 0:01:12.479
<v Speaker 1>It's a very different feel. I bet for you guys too.

0:01:12.520 --> 0:01:15.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean, twenty five years of expectations. This year you

0:01:15.920 --> 0:01:19.679
<v Speaker 1>had none, right because no Farv, no Rogers, right, So

0:01:19.760 --> 0:01:22.760
<v Speaker 1>all the expectations are out now and now Pat like,

0:01:22.800 --> 0:01:25.160
<v Speaker 1>how does this feel? This must be like a Christmas bonus.

0:01:24.959 --> 0:01:27.320
<v Speaker 3>Right, It is like a bonus show.

0:01:27.319 --> 0:01:29.720
<v Speaker 4>And I mentioned this on one of the Fantasy Pro

0:01:29.760 --> 0:01:32.920
<v Speaker 4>shows we recorded earlier today, where really the season was

0:01:32.959 --> 0:01:36.240
<v Speaker 4>all about affirming that Jordan Love was going to be

0:01:36.280 --> 0:01:38.679
<v Speaker 4>the quarterback of the future. Like that was basically it

0:01:38.880 --> 0:01:42.360
<v Speaker 4>find out whether he's the guy we've found out and

0:01:43.280 --> 0:01:45.760
<v Speaker 4>he is, Like he's strung together a number of really

0:01:45.800 --> 0:01:49.040
<v Speaker 4>good games, outplayed Patrick Mahomes last night, and now would

0:01:49.080 --> 0:01:51.440
<v Speaker 4>just be gravy to get this playoff appearance. And it's

0:01:51.480 --> 0:01:54.120
<v Speaker 4>looking pretty good since we're currently holding down the seventh

0:01:54.160 --> 0:01:56.559
<v Speaker 4>spot and don't play a team with a winning record

0:01:56.560 --> 0:01:58.360
<v Speaker 4>the rest of the way. And I said, we so

0:01:58.880 --> 0:02:02.320
<v Speaker 4>I apologies, man, it's the Green Bay Packers. It's there's

0:02:02.400 --> 0:02:05.840
<v Speaker 4>no WI. Although I am a Green Bay Packers stockholder,

0:02:05.840 --> 0:02:07.680
<v Speaker 4>so I guess I can say, oh, yeah, that's all.

0:02:08.040 --> 0:02:10.239
<v Speaker 1>I think. That's absolutely the Wei. I think that yeah,

0:02:10.360 --> 0:02:13.799
<v Speaker 1>speaking of well, maybe not we's, but maybe me's top

0:02:13.800 --> 0:02:15.560
<v Speaker 1>of the show. I promised on Monday I would come

0:02:15.600 --> 0:02:17.520
<v Speaker 1>here and take my licks if the Eagles took theirs,

0:02:17.560 --> 0:02:21.840
<v Speaker 1>and they did so. Brock Perdy, you are the truth,

0:02:22.520 --> 0:02:24.760
<v Speaker 1>Kyle Shanahan. You had the team ready to go. You

0:02:24.800 --> 0:02:26.880
<v Speaker 1>had a good game plan. The Eagles could not tackle.

0:02:26.919 --> 0:02:28.720
<v Speaker 1>The Eagles could not stop you in the backfield. They

0:02:28.800 --> 0:02:30.760
<v Speaker 1>get a hand on somebody and they will go buy them.

0:02:31.240 --> 0:02:33.760
<v Speaker 1>Momentum did seem to swing at one point after the

0:02:33.800 --> 0:02:36.600
<v Speaker 1>security guard incident, and I thought the worm was turning,

0:02:36.600 --> 0:02:39.560
<v Speaker 1>but it did not. So the San Francisco Wine and

0:02:39.639 --> 0:02:42.880
<v Speaker 1>Cheese forty nine ers, you did it. You went in there,

0:02:42.919 --> 0:02:45.120
<v Speaker 1>you were physical, you were tough. You showed me everything

0:02:45.160 --> 0:02:47.520
<v Speaker 1>I needed to believe, So now I believe. Of course,

0:02:47.560 --> 0:02:51.440
<v Speaker 1>the Welsh certainly was texting me immediately after that last

0:02:51.440 --> 0:02:54.880
<v Speaker 1>Deebo Samuel touchdown. I actually texted him and literally as

0:02:54.919 --> 0:02:56.840
<v Speaker 1>I sent it, I got something back from him at

0:02:56.880 --> 0:02:59.400
<v Speaker 1>a message, So I hear you, Welsh on Friday, you

0:02:59.440 --> 0:03:01.280
<v Speaker 1>can go have me. I'm gonna have my wine and

0:03:01.360 --> 0:03:03.720
<v Speaker 1>cheese while you have at me though that I'm going

0:03:03.760 --> 0:03:05.400
<v Speaker 1>to do. So good job by the forty nine ers,

0:03:05.440 --> 0:03:08.120
<v Speaker 1>good job by Purty, great game by McCaffrey, by Debo

0:03:08.200 --> 0:03:10.120
<v Speaker 1>and the defense as well. So shout out to the

0:03:10.160 --> 0:03:12.280
<v Speaker 1>forty nine ers. You went in there to a tough spot,

0:03:12.320 --> 0:03:14.560
<v Speaker 1>you came away with a victory. So good on you.

0:03:15.240 --> 0:03:18.000
<v Speaker 1>Now now I take you seriously, So there you go,

0:03:18.120 --> 0:03:20.320
<v Speaker 1>so we'll take a beat there. Doesn't stop for the

0:03:20.320 --> 0:03:22.120
<v Speaker 1>Eagles too. They get the Cowboys this week, but we'll

0:03:22.160 --> 0:03:24.240
<v Speaker 1>get to those games in the second. Don't forget drop

0:03:24.280 --> 0:03:26.359
<v Speaker 1>your comments below, subscribe to the channel. You just might

0:03:26.400 --> 0:03:30.079
<v Speaker 1>win a Betting Pros one year free premium upgrade. That's right.

0:03:30.160 --> 0:03:33.000
<v Speaker 1>All you gotta do, drop a comment, subscribe ring the

0:03:33.000 --> 0:03:34.800
<v Speaker 1>beltill it goes dang. That's it. That's all you have

0:03:34.840 --> 0:03:37.440
<v Speaker 1>to do to get the betting tools that you've always

0:03:37.480 --> 0:03:40.240
<v Speaker 1>been waiting for the best version of them, to start

0:03:40.280 --> 0:03:43.080
<v Speaker 1>getting smarter, not harder. With us at Betting Pros. I'd

0:03:43.160 --> 0:03:44.920
<v Speaker 1>love to say we're gonna kick off Week fourteen with

0:03:44.960 --> 0:03:48.320
<v Speaker 1>an exciting game. But I can't say that because the

0:03:48.320 --> 0:03:51.200
<v Speaker 1>Patriots are involved in Thursday Night Football. The Patriots coming

0:03:51.200 --> 0:03:55.880
<v Speaker 1>off zero points, zero big gooseig nothing, not a not

0:03:55.960 --> 0:03:59.840
<v Speaker 1>a field goal, not a safety, not anything. New England

0:03:59.840 --> 0:04:01.760
<v Speaker 1>now and ten goes on the road to Pittsburgh. Now,

0:04:01.760 --> 0:04:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Pittsburgh does not have its quarterback Kenny Pickett. He's gonna

0:04:04.040 --> 0:04:06.560
<v Speaker 1>be done for a while. Steelers are seven and five.

0:04:06.600 --> 0:04:08.160
<v Speaker 1>They're coming off a loss and a weird game that

0:04:08.240 --> 0:04:12.120
<v Speaker 1>was delayed twice. Pat. The Steelers are six point favorites

0:04:12.160 --> 0:04:14.840
<v Speaker 1>in this one. You've got thirty and a half is

0:04:14.920 --> 0:04:17.400
<v Speaker 1>the over under plus two twenty on the New England

0:04:17.400 --> 0:04:19.320
<v Speaker 1>side of the money line. I'm taking under here, Pat,

0:04:19.320 --> 0:04:20.680
<v Speaker 1>and I'm taking it now. What do you think?

0:04:21.560 --> 0:04:22.160
<v Speaker 3>Agree?

0:04:22.640 --> 0:04:25.160
<v Speaker 4>I have already hit the under because I'm worried this

0:04:25.240 --> 0:04:27.520
<v Speaker 4>might go lower and we might see something like under.

0:04:27.360 --> 0:04:31.000
<v Speaker 3>Thirty Iowah Hawkeye style. So yeah, I.

0:04:30.920 --> 0:04:33.040
<v Speaker 4>Do like the under, and that's really the only thing

0:04:33.080 --> 0:04:34.680
<v Speaker 4>I like in this game. There's no way I'm laying

0:04:34.720 --> 0:04:36.960
<v Speaker 4>six points with the Steelers, like they've burned me too

0:04:36.960 --> 0:04:41.000
<v Speaker 4>many times in their home games, including just yesterday. Like

0:04:41.080 --> 0:04:45.440
<v Speaker 4>I really thought after the rejuvenated offensive showing. We saw

0:04:45.440 --> 0:04:49.120
<v Speaker 4>in their first game post Matt Canada that the Pittsburgh

0:04:49.120 --> 0:04:52.159
<v Speaker 4>offense was back, and sadly it was not back yesterday.

0:04:52.200 --> 0:04:52.880
<v Speaker 3>And I don't think it.

0:04:52.839 --> 0:04:55.920
<v Speaker 4>Was entirely related to the Kenny Pickett like. They were

0:04:55.960 --> 0:04:59.240
<v Speaker 4>sputtering with Kenny Pickett at quarterback, they were sputtering after

0:04:59.320 --> 0:05:02.480
<v Speaker 4>Kenny Pickett got hurts. I just don't want to take

0:05:02.520 --> 0:05:05.200
<v Speaker 4>either side in this hideous game. And yeah, I'll bet

0:05:05.200 --> 0:05:07.760
<v Speaker 4>the under and you know, tell me how it turns out.

0:05:08.680 --> 0:05:12.120
<v Speaker 1>Sam, speaking of sputtering, Bill Belichick and the Patriots coming

0:05:12.160 --> 0:05:17.320
<v Speaker 1>off a against scoreless game against Brandon Staley, uh, and

0:05:17.360 --> 0:05:20.440
<v Speaker 1>the Chargers going on the road to New England at home.

0:05:20.520 --> 0:05:21.800
<v Speaker 1>So what do you make of this one too? You

0:05:21.839 --> 0:05:23.480
<v Speaker 1>just pound the under with us and running away.

0:05:24.560 --> 0:05:28.720
<v Speaker 2>I actually like the Patriots here. I mean, I don't

0:05:28.720 --> 0:05:31.919
<v Speaker 2>think Mitch Trubisky should be a six point favorite against

0:05:32.080 --> 0:05:35.000
<v Speaker 2>really any team as bad as the Patriots are. And

0:05:35.040 --> 0:05:38.719
<v Speaker 2>the Patriots defense, I think has improved lately to have

0:05:39.600 --> 0:05:42.920
<v Speaker 2>by far the best rushing defense in the league. They

0:05:42.920 --> 0:05:46.920
<v Speaker 2>haven't allowed a success rate overall over forty five percent

0:05:47.040 --> 0:05:51.680
<v Speaker 2>since Week seven against the Bills. They're allowing negative point

0:05:51.800 --> 0:05:54.520
<v Speaker 2>two point five ep of per play on early downs.

0:05:54.520 --> 0:05:57.360
<v Speaker 2>So I think they'll put Pittsburgh behind the sticks and

0:05:57.800 --> 0:06:01.000
<v Speaker 2>force them to throw on on third. And I think again,

0:06:01.080 --> 0:06:05.080
<v Speaker 2>with a total this low, I want to take as

0:06:05.120 --> 0:06:07.360
<v Speaker 2>many points as I can get in. Six points I

0:06:07.440 --> 0:06:11.280
<v Speaker 2>think is enough for New England to stay in. I mean,

0:06:11.279 --> 0:06:14.960
<v Speaker 2>they kept it close against the Chargers. Now, obviously the

0:06:15.279 --> 0:06:20.640
<v Speaker 2>Chargers defenses is much worse than Pittsburgh's, but I think,

0:06:21.720 --> 0:06:24.960
<v Speaker 2>excuse me, New England has enough to keep this game

0:06:25.400 --> 0:06:26.400
<v Speaker 2>within six points.

0:06:27.200 --> 0:06:29.160
<v Speaker 1>All right. Atlanta is at home there two and a

0:06:29.160 --> 0:06:31.680
<v Speaker 1>half point favorites against Tampa. Thirty nine is the number

0:06:31.720 --> 0:06:34.200
<v Speaker 1>on this one plus one fifteen If you think Tampa

0:06:34.240 --> 0:06:35.840
<v Speaker 1>could go in there and come out with a victory,

0:06:35.960 --> 0:06:38.320
<v Speaker 1>Sam this line feels pretty right to me. I don't

0:06:38.360 --> 0:06:40.640
<v Speaker 1>see any value on it right now, Do you see.

0:06:40.400 --> 0:06:41.800
<v Speaker 3>Any I don't.

0:06:41.960 --> 0:06:46.159
<v Speaker 2>Tampa Bay was once a very stout run defense, but

0:06:46.360 --> 0:06:48.600
<v Speaker 2>they've allowed a forty nine percent success right over the

0:06:48.680 --> 0:06:51.520
<v Speaker 2>last four weeks, which is the worst in the league.

0:06:51.520 --> 0:06:54.560
<v Speaker 2>Over that span, they've let both the Colts and the Panthers,

0:06:54.680 --> 0:06:56.880
<v Speaker 2>of all teams, run all over them. Now they face

0:06:57.320 --> 0:07:00.440
<v Speaker 2>a team in the Falcons that are the most heavy

0:07:00.480 --> 0:07:05.400
<v Speaker 2>team this season. That said, I do like the alternates

0:07:05.640 --> 0:07:08.880
<v Speaker 2>with Tampa Bay, you know, taking them minus two and

0:07:08.920 --> 0:07:10.520
<v Speaker 2>a half, minus six and a half something like that,

0:07:10.600 --> 0:07:13.960
<v Speaker 2>because I think Baker is the better quarterback, has a

0:07:14.080 --> 0:07:18.000
<v Speaker 2>much higher ceiling than Desmond Ritter, and he'll be able

0:07:18.040 --> 0:07:21.840
<v Speaker 2>to pass the ball against this Falcons defense. But I

0:07:21.920 --> 0:07:23.720
<v Speaker 2>want to give a quick shout out to Mike evans

0:07:23.760 --> 0:07:28.640
<v Speaker 2>Man ten one thousand straight, ten thousand yard seasons to

0:07:28.680 --> 0:07:30.400
<v Speaker 2>start his career. He's a Hall of Famer for me.

0:07:31.120 --> 0:07:33.000
<v Speaker 1>First ballot Hall of Famer at this point. I mean,

0:07:33.080 --> 0:07:36.240
<v Speaker 1>that's a stunning accomplishment. I know he got to play

0:07:36.240 --> 0:07:37.360
<v Speaker 1>with Tom Brady for a couple of years, but it

0:07:37.440 --> 0:07:41.440
<v Speaker 1>wasn't always tom Brady there. I'll just remind everybody, all right, Pat,

0:07:41.440 --> 0:07:43.480
<v Speaker 1>what are your thoughts on this one here with Atlanta

0:07:43.640 --> 0:07:45.720
<v Speaker 1>and Tampa. Atlanta did look great on the road, they

0:07:45.760 --> 0:07:47.920
<v Speaker 1>never do. Ridder plays better at home. Anything you want

0:07:47.920 --> 0:07:49.960
<v Speaker 1>to take out of this one, Yeah, I.

0:07:50.000 --> 0:07:53.200
<v Speaker 4>Mean, I'm just so thoroughly unimpressed with the Falcons offense.

0:07:53.720 --> 0:07:57.160
<v Speaker 4>For an offense that has Jon Robinson and Kyle Pitts

0:07:57.160 --> 0:08:00.200
<v Speaker 4>and Drake London and it's this underwhelming.

0:08:00.520 --> 0:08:01.720
<v Speaker 3>Hello Arthur Smith.

0:08:02.960 --> 0:08:06.360
<v Speaker 4>This number sort of says that maybe the Falcons on

0:08:06.440 --> 0:08:09.440
<v Speaker 4>a neutral field would be deemed about half a point better.

0:08:09.800 --> 0:08:11.720
<v Speaker 4>I don't really believe that. Like I think there's a

0:08:11.760 --> 0:08:13.760
<v Speaker 4>little bit of value here on the Buccaneers. I'm not

0:08:13.840 --> 0:08:16.040
<v Speaker 4>sure if I like it enough to actually bet at.

0:08:16.560 --> 0:08:18.320
<v Speaker 4>But I know in the pools I plan where I'm

0:08:18.440 --> 0:08:20.480
<v Speaker 4>forced to pick every game against the spread, I'm gonna

0:08:20.480 --> 0:08:21.040
<v Speaker 4>be taking.

0:08:20.840 --> 0:08:21.960
<v Speaker 3>The box in this one.

0:08:22.040 --> 0:08:24.360
<v Speaker 1>If the Falcons just go out there and get aggressive

0:08:24.400 --> 0:08:26.880
<v Speaker 1>on the QB market next year, they could really be

0:08:27.160 --> 0:08:29.760
<v Speaker 1>a force, I think, especially in that NFC South. It

0:08:29.800 --> 0:08:32.880
<v Speaker 1>is not a good division. Let's get to speaking of

0:08:32.920 --> 0:08:35.680
<v Speaker 1>not being very good, the Carolina Panthers. They're now one

0:08:35.760 --> 0:08:38.800
<v Speaker 1>to eleven. As we said, the coaching firing bounce was

0:08:38.800 --> 0:08:41.360
<v Speaker 1>not a thing here for the Carolina Panthers necessarily, although

0:08:41.600 --> 0:08:43.320
<v Speaker 1>they did keep that game closer than I think a

0:08:43.320 --> 0:08:46.240
<v Speaker 1>lot of people like myself thought that they would. New

0:08:46.360 --> 0:08:47.959
<v Speaker 1>Orleans is five and seven. They were at home. Five

0:08:48.000 --> 0:08:50.560
<v Speaker 1>and a half is the number Derek Carr another injury

0:08:50.600 --> 0:08:52.400
<v Speaker 1>last week. Thirty eight is the number on this one.

0:08:52.440 --> 0:08:55.520
<v Speaker 1>Carolina plus two hundred. They getting two to one. I

0:08:55.520 --> 0:08:58.800
<v Speaker 1>would think pat that this would be a larger number

0:08:58.840 --> 0:09:00.959
<v Speaker 1>than that, just a plus two hundre on the money line.

0:09:01.440 --> 0:09:03.240
<v Speaker 1>If this was three to one, I'd be really interested

0:09:03.240 --> 0:09:05.240
<v Speaker 1>in Caroline on the money line, maybe sneaking out of

0:09:05.320 --> 0:09:07.520
<v Speaker 1>victory here with the Saints, especially if Winston ends up

0:09:07.520 --> 0:09:09.280
<v Speaker 1>being quarterback. Do you want to bet this now when

0:09:09.280 --> 0:09:11.760
<v Speaker 1>you have the uncertainty of who's playing quarterback? Or do

0:09:11.800 --> 0:09:13.840
<v Speaker 1>you want to wait for clarity and then maybe lose

0:09:13.880 --> 0:09:14.599
<v Speaker 1>some value?

0:09:15.360 --> 0:09:18.080
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I mean I'm operating under the assumption that Derek

0:09:18.120 --> 0:09:20.559
<v Speaker 4>Carr is gonna miss this one, not only the concussion,

0:09:20.640 --> 0:09:24.080
<v Speaker 4>but like he injured everything on that hit back shoulder

0:09:24.320 --> 0:09:27.760
<v Speaker 4>like this the whole nine yards. Yeah, I mean, he

0:09:27.920 --> 0:09:30.640
<v Speaker 4>was just crushed on that hit. So I think it

0:09:30.679 --> 0:09:34.280
<v Speaker 4>will be James money line. Is interesting that that's an

0:09:34.320 --> 0:09:36.520
<v Speaker 4>angle I hadn't thought about. Joe, Like, I just don't

0:09:36.559 --> 0:09:40.000
<v Speaker 4>know if there's enough value to take the Panthers in

0:09:40.040 --> 0:09:43.640
<v Speaker 4>the points, because the Panthers are a pretty sorry outfit overall,

0:09:43.720 --> 0:09:48.559
<v Speaker 4>but like you could see enough Jamis mistakes to basically

0:09:48.760 --> 0:09:52.600
<v Speaker 4>like hand over a win to the Carolina Panthers. And

0:09:52.640 --> 0:09:55.520
<v Speaker 4>also Jamis playing in this one sort of makes me

0:09:55.679 --> 0:09:58.720
<v Speaker 4>want to bet the over in this one, because Jamis

0:09:59.600 --> 0:10:03.360
<v Speaker 4>throws so aggressively downfield like it can lead to big

0:10:03.400 --> 0:10:06.720
<v Speaker 4>plays for the Saints. It could also lead to you know,

0:10:07.040 --> 0:10:10.680
<v Speaker 4>pick sixes or setting up the Panthers on a really

0:10:10.720 --> 0:10:13.880
<v Speaker 4>short field like I think it's going to maybe spike

0:10:14.040 --> 0:10:15.920
<v Speaker 4>the score of this game a little bit. So getting

0:10:15.960 --> 0:10:19.440
<v Speaker 4>a low total like this gives me some mild interest

0:10:19.480 --> 0:10:20.280
<v Speaker 4>in betting the over.

0:10:20.840 --> 0:10:22.360
<v Speaker 1>Sam, how about you? Do you have a mile interested

0:10:22.360 --> 0:10:23.559
<v Speaker 1>in maybe betting the over in this one?

0:10:23.559 --> 0:10:27.920
<v Speaker 2>Also, that's probably the one lean I would have if

0:10:28.160 --> 0:10:30.560
<v Speaker 2>I were betting on this. I don't really have a

0:10:30.720 --> 0:10:34.720
<v Speaker 2>lean on this game right now. It's Car's second concussion

0:10:34.760 --> 0:10:38.079
<v Speaker 2>in the last three weeks, I think, so I wouldn't

0:10:38.080 --> 0:10:41.680
<v Speaker 2>be surprised if he's out even longer than just this game.

0:10:41.760 --> 0:10:45.440
<v Speaker 2>So I expect Jamis Winston in this game. So in

0:10:45.480 --> 0:10:49.520
<v Speaker 2>a game with Jamis, you're shooting for anything with variants

0:10:49.600 --> 0:10:53.599
<v Speaker 2>and I mean even some alternate overs here too against

0:10:53.280 --> 0:10:54.840
<v Speaker 2>this Panthers defense.

0:10:55.800 --> 0:10:57.800
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's look to the next one here and

0:10:58.320 --> 0:11:01.400
<v Speaker 1>what should be theoretically maybe one sided contest. We'll see

0:11:01.440 --> 0:11:03.760
<v Speaker 1>the Houston Texans seven and five. Tank Dell is gonna

0:11:03.760 --> 0:11:06.760
<v Speaker 1>be out now for a while with that broken leg. Unfortunately,

0:11:06.920 --> 0:11:09.640
<v Speaker 1>very sad situation. They're also sad the New York Jets,

0:11:09.640 --> 0:11:11.920
<v Speaker 1>who are now four and eight. They are six point

0:11:12.040 --> 0:11:14.800
<v Speaker 1>underdogs at home. Feels about right to me. Thirty five

0:11:14.800 --> 0:11:16.280
<v Speaker 1>and a half is the number for this one, plus

0:11:16.280 --> 0:11:19.160
<v Speaker 1>two to twenty. Now, Sam, when we're looking here at

0:11:19.160 --> 0:11:21.079
<v Speaker 1>the New York Jets, you know, we keep talking about, oh,

0:11:21.160 --> 0:11:22.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, the defense of the Jets, defense of the Jets.

0:11:22.880 --> 0:11:24.280
<v Speaker 1>But at the end of the day, you can run

0:11:24.320 --> 0:11:26.319
<v Speaker 1>the football on the Jets. So if you just run

0:11:26.320 --> 0:11:28.600
<v Speaker 1>the football effectively and let CJ. Stroud continue to go

0:11:28.600 --> 0:11:30.120
<v Speaker 1>out there and do what he does best. And he's

0:11:30.120 --> 0:11:34.960
<v Speaker 1>made Noah Brown useful, He's made Robert Woods useful. Clearly

0:11:35.040 --> 0:11:37.320
<v Speaker 1>Nuco Collins coming off a huge game. This feels like

0:11:37.440 --> 0:11:41.360
<v Speaker 1>maybe Houston Texans are getting respect? Are they getting enough

0:11:41.400 --> 0:11:43.240
<v Speaker 1>respect here on this one? I know the money line

0:11:43.240 --> 0:11:44.880
<v Speaker 1>of the Jets is plus two fifteen. I want no

0:11:44.920 --> 0:11:46.480
<v Speaker 1>part of that. The way the Jets offense runs, But

0:11:46.520 --> 0:11:48.880
<v Speaker 1>do you think that the Houston Texans could go out

0:11:48.920 --> 0:11:51.199
<v Speaker 1>there and really just kind of embarrass the Jets with

0:11:51.240 --> 0:11:52.080
<v Speaker 1>the offense that they have.

0:11:53.400 --> 0:11:55.360
<v Speaker 2>I think they can, but I think the market is

0:11:55.400 --> 0:11:58.920
<v Speaker 2>finally caught up to the Texans and who they are,

0:11:59.040 --> 0:12:03.959
<v Speaker 2>understanding that they're or probably top six seven team in

0:12:04.000 --> 0:12:09.040
<v Speaker 2>the AFC right now. And what's keeping me off of

0:12:09.080 --> 0:12:11.360
<v Speaker 2>betting on the Texans is they just had a number

0:12:11.440 --> 0:12:15.640
<v Speaker 2>of situational or process related mistakes. They had three red

0:12:15.720 --> 0:12:18.760
<v Speaker 2>zone field goals this past week. Again it's Denver. They

0:12:18.840 --> 0:12:21.600
<v Speaker 2>used a timeout on defense with thirty seconds left, which

0:12:22.000 --> 0:12:25.400
<v Speaker 2>I get you want to get your best defense in place,

0:12:25.559 --> 0:12:29.000
<v Speaker 2>but that extra time out could have been very helpful

0:12:29.080 --> 0:12:32.080
<v Speaker 2>if Denver scored a touchdown earlier. And they were just

0:12:32.160 --> 0:12:34.839
<v Speaker 2>running the ball too much on early downs to put

0:12:34.880 --> 0:12:37.840
<v Speaker 2>them behind the sticks, and it was just third and

0:12:37.880 --> 0:12:41.800
<v Speaker 2>long for them too too many times. And C. J. Stratt,

0:12:41.800 --> 0:12:44.960
<v Speaker 2>as good as he is, can't play hero ball every

0:12:44.960 --> 0:12:48.040
<v Speaker 2>single third down. That said, I'm not spending any of

0:12:48.080 --> 0:12:51.760
<v Speaker 2>my hard earned money backing the Jets here. Whether it's

0:12:52.120 --> 0:12:54.960
<v Speaker 2>Trevor Simeon or Tim Boyleer or Zach Wilson. I don't

0:12:54.960 --> 0:12:58.240
<v Speaker 2>even know who's going to start in this game, so

0:12:59.000 --> 0:13:01.040
<v Speaker 2>I'm laying off of this one.

0:13:01.320 --> 0:13:04.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm not I'm gonna go with the Houston Texan side

0:13:04.080 --> 0:13:06.800
<v Speaker 1>of this game. I'm confident here and then maybe I'm

0:13:06.800 --> 0:13:09.439
<v Speaker 1>too confident. Maybe Sam is right that you know, everything's

0:13:09.520 --> 0:13:11.200
<v Speaker 1>catching up a little bit to the Houston Texans. They

0:13:11.280 --> 0:13:13.360
<v Speaker 1>keep coming out with victories, but pat they are still

0:13:13.440 --> 0:13:16.440
<v Speaker 1>green and they show that they are still work in progress.

0:13:16.480 --> 0:13:19.559
<v Speaker 1>That being said, I see no progress with the Jets offense,

0:13:19.600 --> 0:13:21.720
<v Speaker 1>no matter who's playing quarterback, and I think more than

0:13:21.720 --> 0:13:23.760
<v Speaker 1>a touchdown. It's one thing when the Falcons they come

0:13:23.800 --> 0:13:26.679
<v Speaker 1>into your building on the road. This is not Desmond Ritter,

0:13:26.800 --> 0:13:28.559
<v Speaker 1>this is C. J. Stroud, and that guy has been

0:13:28.640 --> 0:13:30.080
<v Speaker 1>a difference maker this year.

0:13:31.200 --> 0:13:35.760
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, but we've seen Trevor Simeon flash competence in uh

0:13:36.080 --> 0:13:38.880
<v Speaker 4>when forced to come in and play in a pinch before.

0:13:39.120 --> 0:13:42.320
<v Speaker 4>Like I'm skeptical of that, of course, but I have

0:13:42.400 --> 0:13:48.120
<v Speaker 4>a little bit of trouble laying six points to a

0:13:48.200 --> 0:13:52.200
<v Speaker 4>home dog that has a really legitimate defense like that

0:13:52.360 --> 0:13:54.480
<v Speaker 4>makes me a little bit nervous. I don't know if

0:13:54.480 --> 0:13:57.839
<v Speaker 4>I can do it. I understand what you're saying, like

0:13:57.880 --> 0:14:01.480
<v Speaker 4>there's no confidence in this Jets offense whatsoever. But I

0:14:02.160 --> 0:14:04.440
<v Speaker 4>kind of think the Texans have been overvalued in the

0:14:04.440 --> 0:14:08.560
<v Speaker 4>batting markets. We saw that coming into Week thirteen, they

0:14:08.640 --> 0:14:11.480
<v Speaker 4>had gone I think three and two in their last

0:14:11.520 --> 0:14:14.319
<v Speaker 4>five games, but only one in four against the spread

0:14:14.440 --> 0:14:16.720
<v Speaker 4>over that stretch. And then they did get a cover

0:14:16.800 --> 0:14:19.560
<v Speaker 4>against the Broncos, but it took Russell Wilson committing three

0:14:19.600 --> 0:14:22.400
<v Speaker 4>turnovers in the last what fifteen or sixteen minutes.

0:14:22.440 --> 0:14:25.240
<v Speaker 1>Well, but that'savers that were forced to which I think

0:14:25.280 --> 0:14:27.120
<v Speaker 1>you know they did. They did put some pressure on

0:14:27.120 --> 0:14:29.200
<v Speaker 1>Wilson at the end, and the secondary played well. Will

0:14:29.240 --> 0:14:31.520
<v Speaker 1>Anderson had a really good game. I actually think that

0:14:31.520 --> 0:14:33.840
<v Speaker 1>that Texans defense, which is something we talked about in fantasy,

0:14:33.880 --> 0:14:37.400
<v Speaker 1>like one of the better fantasy stretch runs last playoff defenses,

0:14:37.440 --> 0:14:39.320
<v Speaker 1>they have some great and they have two matchups against

0:14:39.360 --> 0:14:41.760
<v Speaker 1>the Titans they think remaining too, like they've got some

0:14:41.800 --> 0:14:44.120
<v Speaker 1>good situations there the Houston Texans too.

0:14:44.200 --> 0:14:46.120
<v Speaker 4>So I mean a lot of people are going to

0:14:46.160 --> 0:14:48.360
<v Speaker 4>look at this game and say, well, you know, really

0:14:48.360 --> 0:14:52.120
<v Speaker 4>good offense versus really bad offense, slam dunk Texans. I

0:14:52.120 --> 0:14:54.200
<v Speaker 4>don't think it's quite that easy, and I don't see

0:14:54.200 --> 0:14:56.000
<v Speaker 4>the value on betting the Texans.

0:14:56.000 --> 0:14:58.280
<v Speaker 1>All right, Well, I will stand with the lone wolf

0:14:58.320 --> 0:15:00.000
<v Speaker 1>here on my island that I will take the huston

0:15:00.080 --> 0:15:02.720
<v Speaker 1>in Texans. The Indianapolis Colts seven and five making some

0:15:02.760 --> 0:15:05.040
<v Speaker 1>noise in their own What a great story they've been

0:15:05.080 --> 0:15:08.200
<v Speaker 1>Gardner Minshew coming out with a big overtime victory taking

0:15:08.240 --> 0:15:10.240
<v Speaker 1>on the Bengals coming off a Monday night game. We'll

0:15:10.240 --> 0:15:12.120
<v Speaker 1>see what the results are of that. The Bengals are

0:15:12.120 --> 0:15:14.320
<v Speaker 1>five and six. They are two and a half point

0:15:14.360 --> 0:15:17.400
<v Speaker 1>home underdogs, which is understandable. Forty one is the number

0:15:17.400 --> 0:15:20.600
<v Speaker 1>in this one plus one point fifteen forty one pretty

0:15:20.600 --> 0:15:23.160
<v Speaker 1>decent sized number here, considering we're dealing with not one,

0:15:23.200 --> 0:15:27.480
<v Speaker 1>but two secondary quarterbacks. But yet, Pat, I still look

0:15:27.520 --> 0:15:30.280
<v Speaker 1>at it and I'm almost confident in the over. Am

0:15:30.320 --> 0:15:32.400
<v Speaker 1>I crazy?

0:15:32.800 --> 0:15:33.400
<v Speaker 3>H man?

0:15:33.760 --> 0:15:35.960
<v Speaker 4>I'm not touching this one, Joe. I think like the

0:15:37.160 --> 0:15:40.200
<v Speaker 4>total and the spread are pretty spot on. Like, I

0:15:40.280 --> 0:15:41.920
<v Speaker 4>just haven't been able to get on the right side

0:15:41.920 --> 0:15:43.320
<v Speaker 4>of any Colts games this year.

0:15:44.080 --> 0:15:46.400
<v Speaker 3>I can understand the interest in the over with the.

0:15:46.680 --> 0:15:50.240
<v Speaker 4>Fast paced the Cults like to play at and like,

0:15:50.320 --> 0:15:53.120
<v Speaker 4>I don't think Jake Browning is by any stretch of

0:15:53.160 --> 0:15:55.920
<v Speaker 4>the imagination, the worst backup quarterback in the league, and

0:15:55.920 --> 0:15:58.440
<v Speaker 4>he's got a lot of weapons around him, so I

0:15:58.480 --> 0:16:00.920
<v Speaker 4>can see the case for the over. I'm just not

0:16:01.080 --> 0:16:03.560
<v Speaker 4>interested in taking it right now. Maybe if they have,

0:16:03.600 --> 0:16:07.960
<v Speaker 4>and I showing against Jacksonville tonight and the total doesn't

0:16:08.040 --> 0:16:09.080
<v Speaker 4>spike as a result.

0:16:09.280 --> 0:16:11.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, you can maybe interesting to your.

0:16:10.920 --> 0:16:12.720
<v Speaker 1>Point, and that's why I want it like I want

0:16:12.760 --> 0:16:15.040
<v Speaker 1>it now before they look halfway decently, if they put

0:16:15.080 --> 0:16:18.280
<v Speaker 1>up seventeen points tonight, you know, you just put up

0:16:18.320 --> 0:16:19.920
<v Speaker 1>fourteen next week all of a sudden. That makes me

0:16:19.920 --> 0:16:22.120
<v Speaker 1>feel pretty good about maybe getting to this over What

0:16:22.160 --> 0:16:25.400
<v Speaker 1>do you think here? You think? Sam? That again, this

0:16:25.560 --> 0:16:28.280
<v Speaker 1>is one of those conundrums. Betting the Colts has been

0:16:28.360 --> 0:16:30.720
<v Speaker 1>very difficult all year. As Pat was saying, it's hard

0:16:30.760 --> 0:16:31.760
<v Speaker 1>to be on the right side of this. Do you

0:16:31.760 --> 0:16:36.160
<v Speaker 1>feel confident that there is a right side, Sam?

0:16:36.640 --> 0:16:39.640
<v Speaker 2>I don't feel very confident. I mean, five of indianapolis

0:16:39.640 --> 0:16:42.640
<v Speaker 2>seven wins this year have been on the road, and

0:16:42.880 --> 0:16:45.480
<v Speaker 2>in their four game win streak that they're currently riding,

0:16:45.520 --> 0:16:48.440
<v Speaker 2>three of those wins have come on the road. So

0:16:48.480 --> 0:16:51.960
<v Speaker 2>it's hard to say that that's going to continue. And

0:16:52.440 --> 0:16:55.120
<v Speaker 2>I don't know which ones they've been favored in, but

0:16:55.480 --> 0:16:59.120
<v Speaker 2>the Cincinnati defense continues to be just a massive sieve,

0:16:59.600 --> 0:17:04.359
<v Speaker 2>especially against the pass and Indianapolis this could be a

0:17:04.400 --> 0:17:07.520
<v Speaker 2>function of the teams they faced in Tampa Bay and

0:17:07.560 --> 0:17:11.679
<v Speaker 2>Tennessee has a passwright over expectation of six percent or

0:17:11.680 --> 0:17:14.640
<v Speaker 2>greater in their last two games, so I expect them

0:17:14.680 --> 0:17:18.640
<v Speaker 2>to come out throwing the ball against this Bengals defense.

0:17:19.040 --> 0:17:22.479
<v Speaker 2>Michael Pittman looks like a star right now with the

0:17:22.520 --> 0:17:26.840
<v Speaker 2>way that Garner Minshew is targeting him. So I think

0:17:26.880 --> 0:17:31.159
<v Speaker 2>the fast pace plus the Colts passing the ball a

0:17:31.240 --> 0:17:33.919
<v Speaker 2>little bit more definitely leads to the over. And to

0:17:33.960 --> 0:17:39.359
<v Speaker 2>your point, Jake Browning played decently well against Pittsburgh last week.

0:17:39.400 --> 0:17:43.159
<v Speaker 2>Obviously had a couple of lucky bounces that padded his

0:17:43.240 --> 0:17:46.639
<v Speaker 2>stats a little bit, but he's still playing with Jamar

0:17:46.720 --> 0:17:49.199
<v Speaker 2>Chase and t Higgins who's going to be back in

0:17:49.240 --> 0:17:52.159
<v Speaker 2>the game on Monday Night football, and I think with

0:17:52.680 --> 0:17:57.040
<v Speaker 2>just the talent they have on offense, can keep it competitive.

0:17:57.080 --> 0:18:00.399
<v Speaker 2>I do think again I've mentioned this several times, but

0:18:00.720 --> 0:18:03.240
<v Speaker 2>the Colts have a massive coaching advantage here with with

0:18:03.320 --> 0:18:07.960
<v Speaker 2>Shane Steiken. Zach Taylor, I think is getting exposed a

0:18:08.000 --> 0:18:11.199
<v Speaker 2>little bit without having Joe Burrow to cover for some

0:18:11.320 --> 0:18:16.200
<v Speaker 2>of his mistakes. But I slightly lean towards the Colts,

0:18:16.240 --> 0:18:19.680
<v Speaker 2>but I think this line is pretty darn accurate.

0:18:20.720 --> 0:18:23.000
<v Speaker 1>The Rams are now six and six they will take

0:18:23.000 --> 0:18:25.800
<v Speaker 1>on the Baltimore Ravens in Baltimore. Baltimore's nine and three

0:18:25.800 --> 0:18:27.960
<v Speaker 1>coming off of bye. They are seven and a half

0:18:27.960 --> 0:18:30.040
<v Speaker 1>point favors, which makes sense here. Forty four and a

0:18:30.080 --> 0:18:32.760
<v Speaker 1>half is the number The Rams are plus two sixty

0:18:32.760 --> 0:18:34.920
<v Speaker 1>on the money line for an upset. Look, the line's

0:18:34.960 --> 0:18:37.840
<v Speaker 1>telling you that Baltimore should handle their business here against

0:18:38.200 --> 0:18:40.480
<v Speaker 1>this Rams team. Do you think that that is going

0:18:40.520 --> 0:18:42.520
<v Speaker 1>to be the case for this contest? Sam?

0:18:43.119 --> 0:18:46.440
<v Speaker 2>I do You're getting the Ravens off of a bye,

0:18:46.640 --> 0:18:49.720
<v Speaker 2>a team many might consider to be the best team

0:18:49.920 --> 0:18:54.320
<v Speaker 2>in the AFC. If not, the NFL teams have have

0:18:54.440 --> 0:18:58.080
<v Speaker 2>been able to have success on the ground against the Rams.

0:18:58.080 --> 0:19:00.960
<v Speaker 2>That should be no different for the Ravens. I love

0:19:01.000 --> 0:19:04.440
<v Speaker 2>the Ravens here as a potential teaser leg, teasing them

0:19:04.480 --> 0:19:06.800
<v Speaker 2>down from seven or seven and a half down to

0:19:06.880 --> 0:19:10.520
<v Speaker 2>one one and a half. But the Rams defense has

0:19:10.560 --> 0:19:13.960
<v Speaker 2>played somewhat better since thereby the last couple of weeks.

0:19:13.960 --> 0:19:16.520
<v Speaker 2>But that's been against the Seahawks, Cardinals in Browns. So

0:19:17.080 --> 0:19:19.480
<v Speaker 2>nothing really to write home about there.

0:19:20.480 --> 0:19:22.879
<v Speaker 1>All right, Pat, your thoughts on this game here coming up?

0:19:22.920 --> 0:19:26.960
<v Speaker 1>Because the Rams, obviously you know it's got a tough

0:19:26.960 --> 0:19:28.880
<v Speaker 1>spot there on the road in balked More, a tough

0:19:28.880 --> 0:19:31.080
<v Speaker 1>place to play, especially with that week of rest that

0:19:31.160 --> 0:19:33.600
<v Speaker 1>the Ravens are coming off, and you know, still uncertainty.

0:19:33.720 --> 0:19:35.800
<v Speaker 1>The health of Cooper Cup clearly not one hundred percent,

0:19:35.840 --> 0:19:38.679
<v Speaker 1>and Puka Nakua soldiering back onto the field doesn't mean

0:19:38.720 --> 0:19:39.760
<v Speaker 1>he's one hundred percent either.

0:19:41.040 --> 0:19:43.679
<v Speaker 4>I could not bet the Ravens fast enough when I

0:19:43.720 --> 0:19:47.320
<v Speaker 4>saw this line on Sunday Night, Joe, and honestly, I

0:19:47.400 --> 0:19:50.080
<v Speaker 4>was pretty surprised that this number was as modest as

0:19:50.119 --> 0:19:53.760
<v Speaker 4>it was given the Ravens pretty lengthy track record of

0:19:53.800 --> 0:19:58.320
<v Speaker 4>success at home. Plus you've got the West Coast team

0:19:58.440 --> 0:20:01.640
<v Speaker 4>coming out east for the early kickoff, like it's it's

0:20:01.720 --> 0:20:05.719
<v Speaker 4>the classic setup where yeah, I bet the home sitting

0:20:05.800 --> 0:20:09.199
<v Speaker 4>Eastern time zone team. So yeah, the Rams have not

0:20:09.280 --> 0:20:11.560
<v Speaker 4>been the pushovers this season. We thought they were gonna be.

0:20:11.560 --> 0:20:15.000
<v Speaker 4>They a little more teeth both offensively and defensively, I

0:20:15.040 --> 0:20:19.040
<v Speaker 4>think than we were expecting. But man, like, not only

0:20:19.080 --> 0:20:22.359
<v Speaker 4>did I get the Rams at plug or the Ravens

0:20:22.400 --> 0:20:24.840
<v Speaker 4>at minus seven and a half, but I got them

0:20:24.840 --> 0:20:28.000
<v Speaker 4>at minus one oh five, And like, I'm expecting this

0:20:28.040 --> 0:20:30.200
<v Speaker 4>thing to move closer to like eight or nine points

0:20:30.240 --> 0:20:32.880
<v Speaker 4>as the week goes on. So I'm really super if

0:20:32.960 --> 0:20:34.840
<v Speaker 4>I got it at one oh five, like it's gonna

0:20:34.840 --> 0:20:37.840
<v Speaker 4>take some Ravens to get it right now.

0:20:37.880 --> 0:20:39.560
<v Speaker 1>It actually went in the other direction, which I think

0:20:39.600 --> 0:20:41.439
<v Speaker 1>is kind of crazy. So just this morning when from

0:20:41.480 --> 0:20:43.960
<v Speaker 1>seven and a half to seven in some spots, good, Yeah, they.

0:20:43.880 --> 0:20:46.240
<v Speaker 2>Are thing to remember and I don't remember that have

0:20:46.320 --> 0:20:47.840
<v Speaker 2>the exact stet off the top of my head. But

0:20:47.920 --> 0:20:51.040
<v Speaker 2>Lamar Jackson against NFC teams, I think he's got like

0:20:51.119 --> 0:20:54.000
<v Speaker 2>one loss against them in his career, and yes, and

0:20:54.080 --> 0:20:57.320
<v Speaker 2>I hate I hear trend betting like that, but I

0:20:57.320 --> 0:21:00.320
<v Speaker 2>think there is some signal to these teams who don't

0:21:00.359 --> 0:21:04.760
<v Speaker 2>see a Lamar Jackson type player as often. Obviously the

0:21:04.840 --> 0:21:08.280
<v Speaker 2>Rams get Kyler Murray, but I think they're slightly different

0:21:08.960 --> 0:21:12.040
<v Speaker 2>play styles despite their both him being mobile.

0:21:13.000 --> 0:21:15.760
<v Speaker 1>Now, the next game on our list today is this

0:21:15.920 --> 0:21:18.439
<v Speaker 1>NFC North matchup between the Bears and the Lions, and

0:21:18.480 --> 0:21:20.440
<v Speaker 1>the Bears are at home. They are three and a

0:21:20.480 --> 0:21:24.400
<v Speaker 1>half point underdogs at home, which again makes sense here

0:21:24.680 --> 0:21:27.160
<v Speaker 1>the Lions have had trouble closing out games and also

0:21:27.280 --> 0:21:29.600
<v Speaker 1>the Lions defense has given up a fair amount of

0:21:29.600 --> 0:21:31.560
<v Speaker 1>points this last few weeks. So I'm a little concerned

0:21:31.600 --> 0:21:34.360
<v Speaker 1>here with this trend line. Forty three is the over

0:21:34.560 --> 0:21:37.719
<v Speaker 1>under plus one fifty for Chicago on the money line, Pat,

0:21:38.560 --> 0:21:40.760
<v Speaker 1>I know that the Detroit Lions are the better team,

0:21:41.359 --> 0:21:44.280
<v Speaker 1>but if I'm pointing at one game this week on

0:21:44.320 --> 0:21:47.240
<v Speaker 1>the schedule that feels like a potential upset, it's this one.

0:21:47.640 --> 0:21:50.960
<v Speaker 1>As the Bears continue to find their identity and know

0:21:51.040 --> 0:21:54.000
<v Speaker 1>that they're all playing basically for their jobs, including justin

0:21:54.040 --> 0:21:56.840
<v Speaker 1>Fields to say, hey, I'm the franchise guy. I feel

0:21:56.880 --> 0:21:58.879
<v Speaker 1>like there's a lot riding on this. And not to mention,

0:21:59.280 --> 0:22:01.119
<v Speaker 1>the Bears defense has played a lot better than I

0:22:01.160 --> 0:22:02.760
<v Speaker 1>think people give him credit for in the last few weeks,

0:22:02.800 --> 0:22:05.280
<v Speaker 1>especially in the secondary once Brisker got healthy again. So

0:22:05.320 --> 0:22:07.719
<v Speaker 1>what do you think about this matchup here? Is this

0:22:07.840 --> 0:22:09.679
<v Speaker 1>the potential upset on the slate that maybe a lot

0:22:09.680 --> 0:22:10.600
<v Speaker 1>of people don't see coming.

0:22:11.520 --> 0:22:13.960
<v Speaker 4>I do see value on the Bears, Joe, and I

0:22:14.040 --> 0:22:17.040
<v Speaker 4>wouldn't mind a money line bats on Chicago as a

0:22:17.040 --> 0:22:21.679
<v Speaker 4>home dog. So like it seems like this line in

0:22:21.720 --> 0:22:25.040
<v Speaker 4>this total are being swayed somewhat by the Bears last

0:22:25.080 --> 0:22:28.040
<v Speaker 4>game that Monday night game, against the Vikings, where the

0:22:28.080 --> 0:22:32.000
<v Speaker 4>Bears did win thanks to you know, like a host

0:22:32.000 --> 0:22:36.919
<v Speaker 4>of turnovers. But like the Bears offense wasn't clicking and

0:22:36.960 --> 0:22:38.640
<v Speaker 4>they could not get into the ends and they kept

0:22:38.640 --> 0:22:42.359
<v Speaker 4>settling for field goals, And I think that has people

0:22:42.400 --> 0:22:44.879
<v Speaker 4>sort of misconstruing the Bears as some sort of offensively

0:22:45.000 --> 0:22:47.520
<v Speaker 4>challenged team, which I don't think is the case.

0:22:47.560 --> 0:22:48.160
<v Speaker 3>I mean, we know.

0:22:48.200 --> 0:22:50.760
<v Speaker 4>They've got a very explosive quarterback and a very explosive

0:22:50.800 --> 0:22:51.920
<v Speaker 4>receiver in Dj Moore.

0:22:53.280 --> 0:22:54.640
<v Speaker 3>So yeah, I like this.

0:22:54.640 --> 0:22:57.639
<v Speaker 4>Like the Lions laid an egg on Thanksgiving Day against

0:22:57.640 --> 0:23:00.520
<v Speaker 4>the Packers, they jumped out to a huge early lead

0:23:00.560 --> 0:23:03.080
<v Speaker 4>against the Saints and let the Saints back in the game.

0:23:03.920 --> 0:23:06.680
<v Speaker 4>The Lions have just not been that impressive lately, and

0:23:07.359 --> 0:23:11.000
<v Speaker 4>the Lions they have just been an over machine lately.

0:23:11.080 --> 0:23:13.439
<v Speaker 4>So seeing this game, like it opened at forty four

0:23:13.480 --> 0:23:15.720
<v Speaker 4>and a half DraftKings, it was down to forty three

0:23:15.760 --> 0:23:18.320
<v Speaker 4>and a half and I'm not sure why the total

0:23:18.480 --> 0:23:19.120
<v Speaker 4>is going down.

0:23:19.200 --> 0:23:22.159
<v Speaker 1>Rather it's forty three on the consensus. O.

0:23:22.320 --> 0:23:26.400
<v Speaker 4>Man, Yeah, I'm smashing the over in that absolutely, Sam.

0:23:26.240 --> 0:23:27.480
<v Speaker 1>How do you feel about this one? Dude? Do you

0:23:27.520 --> 0:23:29.359
<v Speaker 1>see what Pat and I see are you just gonna

0:23:29.359 --> 0:23:31.240
<v Speaker 1>be a little bit more conservative maybe and just take

0:23:31.240 --> 0:23:32.720
<v Speaker 1>the over I do.

0:23:32.840 --> 0:23:35.960
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I think the the Lions, well, yeah, from

0:23:35.960 --> 0:23:38.399
<v Speaker 2>the total perspective, I'm for sure taking the over. I've

0:23:38.440 --> 0:23:41.159
<v Speaker 2>already taken the over this morning. Both of these teams

0:23:41.280 --> 0:23:45.080
<v Speaker 2>have capable offenses and defenses that are suspect. You mentioned

0:23:45.080 --> 0:23:49.399
<v Speaker 2>that Chicago's defense had been playing better, but you know,

0:23:49.440 --> 0:23:51.840
<v Speaker 2>you look at the again, the opponents that they faced,

0:23:51.880 --> 0:23:54.879
<v Speaker 2>the Saints offense that's been sort of all over the place,

0:23:55.160 --> 0:23:58.320
<v Speaker 2>a Panthers team that hasn't been great. They got eviscerated

0:23:58.400 --> 0:24:00.840
<v Speaker 2>by the Lions just a couple weeks ago, and then

0:24:01.359 --> 0:24:04.680
<v Speaker 2>we're saved by a bunch of turnovers against Minnesota. So

0:24:05.040 --> 0:24:08.600
<v Speaker 2>I think Detroit's offense being able to put up against

0:24:08.640 --> 0:24:12.959
<v Speaker 2>this Bears defense and the Lions defense not you know,

0:24:13.359 --> 0:24:15.920
<v Speaker 2>being great. They've been one of the worst defenses in

0:24:15.960 --> 0:24:19.840
<v Speaker 2>the last several weeks, and Chicago was able to score

0:24:19.840 --> 0:24:23.480
<v Speaker 2>against them a couple of weeks ago. So I would

0:24:23.520 --> 0:24:27.120
<v Speaker 2>have ran to Lions minus three and a half if

0:24:27.160 --> 0:24:31.119
<v Speaker 2>not for the heart palpitations that they gave this past

0:24:31.160 --> 0:24:34.320
<v Speaker 2>week against the Saints, because I had them minus four

0:24:34.440 --> 0:24:37.760
<v Speaker 2>and I was sitting, you know, lounging back when they

0:24:37.760 --> 0:24:41.199
<v Speaker 2>were up twenty one to nothing and then jeez, I

0:24:41.240 --> 0:24:43.439
<v Speaker 2>almost lost it. If they would would have lost, so

0:24:44.920 --> 0:24:47.760
<v Speaker 2>almost I do. I do still like the Lions, but

0:24:48.000 --> 0:24:51.560
<v Speaker 2>the to or excuse me, the over is what I'm

0:24:51.600 --> 0:24:53.240
<v Speaker 2>targeting here, all.

0:24:53.200 --> 0:24:54.800
<v Speaker 1>Right, Before we get to our next game, which is

0:24:54.840 --> 0:24:57.680
<v Speaker 1>an AFC matchup with big time playoff implications, don't forget

0:24:57.680 --> 0:25:00.560
<v Speaker 1>to tune into our newest NBA show over Betting Pros,

0:25:00.600 --> 0:25:03.600
<v Speaker 1>and that's Fast Break Bets with Matt Mody. Every single

0:25:03.600 --> 0:25:06.200
<v Speaker 1>Wednesday and Friday eleven am Eastern. He is live breaking

0:25:06.280 --> 0:25:08.919
<v Speaker 1>down the NBA betting slate for you over on our

0:25:08.920 --> 0:25:11.359
<v Speaker 1>Betting Pros YouTube channel, So make sure you subscribe for

0:25:11.359 --> 0:25:14.040
<v Speaker 1>the hottest picks and the juiciest odds for that day's

0:25:14.160 --> 0:25:16.920
<v Speaker 1>NBA action. So Matt is absolutely crushing it there again

0:25:16.960 --> 0:25:20.800
<v Speaker 1>Fast Break Bets right here on Betting Pros. Now, Cleveland

0:25:20.840 --> 0:25:23.160
<v Speaker 1>seven and five is going to be a home underdog

0:25:23.200 --> 0:25:25.920
<v Speaker 1>to the Jacksonville Jaguars. Whore eight and three thirty six

0:25:25.920 --> 0:25:27.240
<v Speaker 1>and a half is a number for this one plus

0:25:27.240 --> 0:25:29.360
<v Speaker 1>one thirty five on the money line for the Cleveland Browns.

0:25:29.760 --> 0:25:32.240
<v Speaker 1>I gotta say, right, now my early lean and I

0:25:32.320 --> 0:25:34.440
<v Speaker 1>might even be more of a more of a better

0:25:34.480 --> 0:25:36.400
<v Speaker 1>than a leaner at this point is on the Cleveland

0:25:36.480 --> 0:25:38.280
<v Speaker 1>side of this game. I don't know what it is,

0:25:38.800 --> 0:25:41.280
<v Speaker 1>but maybe I'm just drinking the Joe Flacco kool aid.

0:25:41.320 --> 0:25:42.880
<v Speaker 1>And I think when he gets back with another week

0:25:42.920 --> 0:25:45.960
<v Speaker 1>of practice here with the Cleveland Browns at home, I

0:25:45.960 --> 0:25:47.479
<v Speaker 1>think they can come out with a victory. I kind

0:25:47.480 --> 0:25:49.040
<v Speaker 1>of like the money line on this one. Sam, what

0:25:49.040 --> 0:25:51.360
<v Speaker 1>do you think, am I getting a little too too

0:25:51.359 --> 0:25:53.520
<v Speaker 1>excited about another Joe? Is that what's happening?

0:25:54.080 --> 0:25:57.080
<v Speaker 2>I think you are. I think Joe Flacco sort of

0:25:57.119 --> 0:26:01.440
<v Speaker 2>looked better than how he actually played. I mean it's

0:26:01.480 --> 0:26:05.840
<v Speaker 2>also relative to how Browns quarterbacks have played this year,

0:26:05.920 --> 0:26:08.920
<v Speaker 2>which is has not been great at all. I think

0:26:09.240 --> 0:26:11.480
<v Speaker 2>some of that shine is gonna wear off. Amari Cooper

0:26:11.560 --> 0:26:14.920
<v Speaker 2>is dealing with a concussion injury as well, which would

0:26:14.960 --> 0:26:18.399
<v Speaker 2>be a huge loss to them. And I think the

0:26:18.480 --> 0:26:22.600
<v Speaker 2>Jacksonville defense is much better than the Rams as well. Impredictable,

0:26:22.640 --> 0:26:26.480
<v Speaker 2>which is a website that uses betting odds looking out

0:26:26.480 --> 0:26:30.720
<v Speaker 2>into the future, has them rated as the seventh best defense,

0:26:31.000 --> 0:26:33.960
<v Speaker 2>compared to just the twentieth best for the Rams. And

0:26:34.440 --> 0:26:38.480
<v Speaker 2>the Jacksonville offenses looked fixed the last couple of weekends,

0:26:38.640 --> 0:26:40.680
<v Speaker 2>and excuse me, the last couple of weeks, and the

0:26:40.720 --> 0:26:44.679
<v Speaker 2>Cleveland defense just had their worst output from an EPA

0:26:44.760 --> 0:26:49.200
<v Speaker 2>per play perspective against the Rams. I like the Jaguars here,

0:26:49.520 --> 0:26:51.800
<v Speaker 2>even coming off of a short week.

0:26:52.720 --> 0:26:55.960
<v Speaker 1>All right, so we're split here, pat break the tie,

0:26:56.080 --> 0:26:58.280
<v Speaker 1>Cleveland or Jacksonville. Do you have any early leans in

0:26:58.280 --> 0:26:58.600
<v Speaker 1>this game?

0:26:59.119 --> 0:26:59.520
<v Speaker 2>Oh?

0:26:59.560 --> 0:27:01.119
<v Speaker 4>I'm not going to be a very good tie breaker

0:27:01.119 --> 0:27:03.920
<v Speaker 4>because I'm torn between your two points of view. When

0:27:03.960 --> 0:27:07.199
<v Speaker 4>I first saw this line, my instinct was that, you know,

0:27:07.240 --> 0:27:10.000
<v Speaker 4>there was value on the Jaguars here. But then the

0:27:10.040 --> 0:27:12.040
<v Speaker 4>more I thought about it and how Cleveland can be

0:27:12.080 --> 0:27:15.920
<v Speaker 4>a pretty tough place for visiting teams to play, the

0:27:16.320 --> 0:27:19.640
<v Speaker 4>Joe Flack like, I do think Joe Flacco does sort

0:27:19.680 --> 0:27:22.080
<v Speaker 4>of legitimize this offense and give them at least a

0:27:22.080 --> 0:27:25.080
<v Speaker 4>little bit of balance. Yeah, we're probably due for some

0:27:25.200 --> 0:27:27.720
<v Speaker 4>horrible Joe Flacco game at some point. Maybe it's this

0:27:27.800 --> 0:27:31.040
<v Speaker 4>week against the Jaguars defense, which is one of the

0:27:31.040 --> 0:27:34.640
<v Speaker 4>more underrated defenses in the league. But boy, right now,

0:27:34.680 --> 0:27:36.600
<v Speaker 4>I think this is just a good number and I'm

0:27:36.640 --> 0:27:38.720
<v Speaker 4>not really interested in betting it either way.

0:27:38.760 --> 0:27:40.960
<v Speaker 3>Honestly, from good numbers to big numbers.

0:27:41.240 --> 0:27:44.720
<v Speaker 1>The Seattle Seahawks put up a big thirty five, came

0:27:44.800 --> 0:27:47.160
<v Speaker 1>up with a loss, though regardless against the Cowboys earlier.

0:27:47.200 --> 0:27:48.840
<v Speaker 1>They're gonna have some extra time rest, but it doesn't

0:27:48.840 --> 0:27:51.199
<v Speaker 1>matter to go into San Francisco to take on the

0:27:51.200 --> 0:27:53.800
<v Speaker 1>forty nine ers minus ten and a half favorites at

0:27:53.800 --> 0:27:56.080
<v Speaker 1>home at minus one ten, that's a consensus line. Forty

0:27:56.119 --> 0:27:58.600
<v Speaker 1>six and a half right now is the total for

0:27:58.640 --> 0:28:01.520
<v Speaker 1>this game, plus four hundred for this Seattle upset. So Pat,

0:28:01.560 --> 0:28:04.119
<v Speaker 1>this really comes down to one thing. Is there any

0:28:04.160 --> 0:28:08.720
<v Speaker 1>sort of residual jet lag after that big Philly loss

0:28:08.720 --> 0:28:11.119
<v Speaker 1>where a letdown against Seattle? I don't think there is.

0:28:11.560 --> 0:28:11.679
<v Speaker 2>That.

0:28:11.800 --> 0:28:13.639
<v Speaker 1>Being said, ten and a half is a big number,

0:28:13.720 --> 0:28:15.399
<v Speaker 1>so can you get behind that? I was all about

0:28:15.400 --> 0:28:17.920
<v Speaker 1>on Thursday Night Football, the Seahawks covering the nine and

0:28:17.960 --> 0:28:21.040
<v Speaker 1>a half. I'm less confident here in this one against

0:28:21.080 --> 0:28:22.600
<v Speaker 1>San fran than I was against Dallas.

0:28:23.480 --> 0:28:23.760
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:28:23.800 --> 0:28:27.000
<v Speaker 4>Same, I got that cover along with you in Seattle, Joell,

0:28:27.040 --> 0:28:29.199
<v Speaker 4>though towards the end, I was starting to feel like

0:28:29.280 --> 0:28:32.560
<v Speaker 4>it was kind of a greasy cover if not gonna lie,

0:28:32.600 --> 0:28:38.120
<v Speaker 4>but we did just see Seattle hang with Dallas and

0:28:38.160 --> 0:28:41.800
<v Speaker 4>fight them tooth and nail in that game, and yet

0:28:42.320 --> 0:28:44.920
<v Speaker 4>here they are opening as a double digit road dog

0:28:45.000 --> 0:28:47.840
<v Speaker 4>against San Francisco. And who can argue after what San

0:28:47.880 --> 0:28:50.720
<v Speaker 4>Francisco did to Philadelphia.

0:28:50.440 --> 0:28:51.400
<v Speaker 3>In Week thirteen.

0:28:51.560 --> 0:28:54.880
<v Speaker 4>So yeah, I mean, if I were going to bet

0:28:54.920 --> 0:28:57.360
<v Speaker 4>this one, I would probably lay the points with the

0:28:57.400 --> 0:29:00.360
<v Speaker 4>forty nine ers. I mean, we've seen that they they

0:29:00.400 --> 0:29:03.440
<v Speaker 4>can absolutely land the heaviest punch of any team in

0:29:03.480 --> 0:29:06.280
<v Speaker 4>the NFL, and boy did the Eagles take one on

0:29:06.320 --> 0:29:08.040
<v Speaker 4>the chin in Week thirteen.

0:29:08.160 --> 0:29:10.800
<v Speaker 3>So I'm not betting against the Niners right now.

0:29:11.200 --> 0:29:13.840
<v Speaker 1>Does Seattle have any unfinished business here with the forty

0:29:13.880 --> 0:29:16.360
<v Speaker 1>nine ers from last year at all? Where maybe Sam

0:29:16.400 --> 0:29:18.840
<v Speaker 1>they're taking this game more seriously than the forty nine

0:29:18.920 --> 0:29:19.280
<v Speaker 1>ers are.

0:29:20.280 --> 0:29:22.520
<v Speaker 2>I mean, they have unfinished business, but I don't think

0:29:22.520 --> 0:29:25.480
<v Speaker 2>they're going to finish it on Sunday by any means.

0:29:25.520 --> 0:29:28.720
<v Speaker 2>I mean, the forty nine Ers blew the breaks off

0:29:28.800 --> 0:29:32.600
<v Speaker 2>the Seahawks on Thanksgiving, you know, ten twelve days ago,

0:29:32.640 --> 0:29:36.280
<v Speaker 2>however long ago that was, and Seattle had their best

0:29:36.280 --> 0:29:39.440
<v Speaker 2>offensive output of the season against a great Dallas defense.

0:29:39.560 --> 0:29:43.240
<v Speaker 2>But I don't think that continues against San Francisco. The

0:29:44.200 --> 0:29:47.760
<v Speaker 2>forty nine ers at full health are the best team

0:29:47.800 --> 0:29:52.040
<v Speaker 2>in the NFL. They're clicking on all cylinders offensive defensively

0:29:52.280 --> 0:29:56.160
<v Speaker 2>like they are just In I think, a class of

0:29:56.240 --> 0:30:00.240
<v Speaker 2>their own, and so I don't think the Seahawks really

0:30:00.280 --> 0:30:00.840
<v Speaker 2>keep it close.

0:30:00.920 --> 0:30:05.160
<v Speaker 1>Unfortunately, all right, Minnesota six and six goes to Las Vegas.

0:30:05.160 --> 0:30:09.040
<v Speaker 1>Who's five and seven? Vegas at home three point underdogs.

0:30:09.040 --> 0:30:10.800
<v Speaker 1>Minus one ten forty and a half is the number

0:30:10.880 --> 0:30:13.640
<v Speaker 1>in the consensus betting pros app right now plus one

0:30:13.800 --> 0:30:15.760
<v Speaker 1>thirty for the Raiders to win this game. Now, you're

0:30:15.760 --> 0:30:18.719
<v Speaker 1>getting Jefferson back, some lack of clarity of who's going

0:30:18.800 --> 0:30:21.000
<v Speaker 1>to be throwing the ball to him, Sam, do you

0:30:21.000 --> 0:30:23.200
<v Speaker 1>take advantage of that fact? Or do you think the

0:30:23.240 --> 0:30:25.760
<v Speaker 1>line is even right here? This is a a tough

0:30:25.800 --> 0:30:28.840
<v Speaker 1>game to really peg down. For me, this is more

0:30:28.840 --> 0:30:31.920
<v Speaker 1>of a two or maybe a one and a half here,

0:30:32.560 --> 0:30:34.800
<v Speaker 1>And I don't know, I feel like the Vikings are

0:30:34.800 --> 0:30:37.920
<v Speaker 1>getting a little too much credit. What do you think, Sam?

0:30:38.440 --> 0:30:41.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, this was a very tough one. We got both

0:30:41.120 --> 0:30:44.000
<v Speaker 2>teams coming off there by the Vikings getting Justin Jefferson back,

0:30:44.440 --> 0:30:48.160
<v Speaker 2>Las Vegas has allowed a nine point one percent explosive

0:30:48.160 --> 0:30:51.800
<v Speaker 2>pass rate the last four weeks, and Jefferson is only

0:30:51.840 --> 0:30:54.920
<v Speaker 2>going to help that. I think the Vikings defense is

0:30:54.960 --> 0:30:59.520
<v Speaker 2>probably a bit too much for Las Vegas. Vikings have

0:30:59.720 --> 0:31:02.280
<v Speaker 2>a lot a negative point zero seven ep of per

0:31:02.320 --> 0:31:05.160
<v Speaker 2>play this year, which is seventh best in the league,

0:31:05.160 --> 0:31:08.600
<v Speaker 2>of forty two point one percent success rate which is ninth.

0:31:09.160 --> 0:31:13.240
<v Speaker 2>So I would prefer taking the Vikings on the money

0:31:13.240 --> 0:31:17.040
<v Speaker 2>line here without the points. I just think again from

0:31:17.280 --> 0:31:21.720
<v Speaker 2>a coaching perspective, to Minnesota has the edge, I would

0:31:21.720 --> 0:31:24.400
<v Speaker 2>be more excited about having Josh Dopps back there than

0:31:24.880 --> 0:31:27.360
<v Speaker 2>any of the other options that Minnesota has.

0:31:27.920 --> 0:31:30.200
<v Speaker 1>All Right, Pat, what are your thoughts your Vikings Raiders?

0:31:31.120 --> 0:31:33.600
<v Speaker 4>Boy, Sam is trying to talk to me out, talk

0:31:33.720 --> 0:31:36.040
<v Speaker 4>me out of this about I basically saw this the

0:31:36.080 --> 0:31:38.440
<v Speaker 4>same way you did, Joe, Like, I thought this should

0:31:38.440 --> 0:31:39.120
<v Speaker 4>be closer to.

0:31:39.080 --> 0:31:40.560
<v Speaker 3>A pick them.

0:31:40.920 --> 0:31:41.000
<v Speaker 2>Like.

0:31:42.160 --> 0:31:44.040
<v Speaker 4>The Raiders are three and one against the spread in

0:31:44.040 --> 0:31:49.320
<v Speaker 4>their last four and they've played undeniably like respectably since

0:31:49.400 --> 0:31:52.640
<v Speaker 4>firing Josh McDaniels. They've been like a totally different team.

0:31:52.800 --> 0:31:57.400
<v Speaker 4>And the Vikings. Yeah, maybe part of this line is

0:31:57.480 --> 0:32:01.920
<v Speaker 4>the bounce from the impending just and Jefferson return, But man,

0:32:01.960 --> 0:32:03.880
<v Speaker 4>it does seem like it's too big a bounce like

0:32:05.240 --> 0:32:10.040
<v Speaker 4>this Josh Dobbs feel good story, like he played so

0:32:10.280 --> 0:32:13.040
<v Speaker 4>badly against the Bears that we went from this feel

0:32:13.080 --> 0:32:16.160
<v Speaker 4>good story with Dobbs, the you know, fairy tale season

0:32:16.240 --> 0:32:19.000
<v Speaker 4>for him to Kevin O'Connell being like, uh, yeah, I

0:32:19.000 --> 0:32:21.560
<v Speaker 4>don't know what we're doing at quarterback for Week fourteen

0:32:21.800 --> 0:32:23.320
<v Speaker 4>when we come out of the bottom like it was

0:32:23.480 --> 0:32:27.600
<v Speaker 4>that wretch at a performance. So, man I I am

0:32:27.600 --> 0:32:29.880
<v Speaker 4>inclined to just take the Raiders on the money line

0:32:29.920 --> 0:32:32.840
<v Speaker 4>like a very small bats. Yeah, just because I think

0:32:32.920 --> 0:32:35.720
<v Speaker 4>they are absolutely live in this game. Like I don't

0:32:35.720 --> 0:32:39.080
<v Speaker 4>think they are too out goned by any you know,

0:32:40.120 --> 0:32:42.120
<v Speaker 4>there's not a big talent gap in this game.

0:32:42.160 --> 0:32:43.000
<v Speaker 3>There just isn't.

0:32:43.120 --> 0:32:47.040
<v Speaker 4>So I know there's not the usual home field advantage

0:32:47.120 --> 0:32:50.400
<v Speaker 4>for the Raiders in Las Vegas, but man I still

0:32:50.440 --> 0:32:52.080
<v Speaker 4>think that's where the value.

0:32:51.800 --> 0:32:53.440
<v Speaker 1>Is, all right. The next one here, this is a

0:32:53.440 --> 0:32:56.160
<v Speaker 1>fascinating one. The Chief's coming off of a tough loss.

0:32:56.720 --> 0:32:58.280
<v Speaker 1>They have, they're eight and four, but they don't look

0:32:58.320 --> 0:33:00.720
<v Speaker 1>like a dominant team right now. Six and six Buffalo

0:33:00.720 --> 0:33:03.080
<v Speaker 1>Bills are coming into Kansas City, and maybe this is

0:33:03.120 --> 0:33:05.320
<v Speaker 1>exactly what both of these teams need. I don't know.

0:33:06.120 --> 0:33:07.880
<v Speaker 1>The Chiefs are just two and a half point favorites,

0:33:07.920 --> 0:33:10.040
<v Speaker 1>though forty seven and a half is the consensus number.

0:33:10.040 --> 0:33:12.600
<v Speaker 1>At minus one ten you get plus one eighteen on

0:33:12.600 --> 0:33:15.640
<v Speaker 1>the Buffalo side. Pat. This game kind of reminds me

0:33:15.680 --> 0:33:18.840
<v Speaker 1>of like two aging divas who are picking up a

0:33:18.920 --> 0:33:21.880
<v Speaker 1>Las Vegas residency, where you know, it's like, oh, come

0:33:21.920 --> 0:33:24.800
<v Speaker 1>see Celine Dion and Share do this? You know, like

0:33:25.560 --> 0:33:27.760
<v Speaker 1>neither of these teams right now look like the best

0:33:27.760 --> 0:33:31.360
<v Speaker 1>team in the AFC, yet they are still you know,

0:33:32.040 --> 0:33:33.680
<v Speaker 1>in a lot of ways, favorites and a lot of

0:33:33.680 --> 0:33:35.960
<v Speaker 1>people's minds. So what do you take out of this one?

0:33:36.000 --> 0:33:38.320
<v Speaker 3>Any early value could we get that?

0:33:38.400 --> 0:33:41.959
<v Speaker 4>Like Selene versus Share is the undercard at Caesar's Palace

0:33:42.000 --> 0:33:42.520
<v Speaker 4>for someday.

0:33:42.960 --> 0:33:45.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I'd pay to see that. I don't know what

0:33:45.680 --> 0:33:47.160
<v Speaker 1>the odds are on that one. I think I've got.

0:33:47.360 --> 0:33:50.160
<v Speaker 1>I got Celine Dion. You know, she's her stamina is

0:33:50.280 --> 0:33:52.880
<v Speaker 1>very good. Although Share, you know what is she like

0:33:52.920 --> 0:33:53.560
<v Speaker 1>eighty years old?

0:33:53.600 --> 0:33:53.719
<v Speaker 2>Now?

0:33:53.720 --> 0:33:55.520
<v Speaker 1>I feel like, I mean, she's still out there sicking,

0:33:55.600 --> 0:33:56.560
<v Speaker 1>so God bless her.

0:33:57.600 --> 0:34:00.480
<v Speaker 4>Even even with the loss to the Packers and Sunday Night,

0:34:00.520 --> 0:34:02.120
<v Speaker 4>I think a lot of people will look at this

0:34:02.240 --> 0:34:06.960
<v Speaker 4>line and instantly be have the instinct to bet the Chiefs,

0:34:07.000 --> 0:34:09.440
<v Speaker 4>Like this number isn't big enough. But it was interesting

0:34:09.480 --> 0:34:13.480
<v Speaker 4>that last week in the massive Peabody ratings, I think

0:34:13.520 --> 0:34:15.760
<v Speaker 4>the Bills were ranked like a quarter of a point

0:34:15.920 --> 0:34:19.320
<v Speaker 4>higher than the Chiefs, and certainly the Chiefs number didn't

0:34:19.320 --> 0:34:22.840
<v Speaker 4>go up with that loss to Green Bay. So like this,

0:34:22.840 --> 0:34:25.120
<v Speaker 4>this feels like the right line to me. I mean,

0:34:25.160 --> 0:34:28.240
<v Speaker 4>plus the Bills. Boy, right now, the Bills and the

0:34:28.280 --> 0:34:30.879
<v Speaker 4>Texans are on the outside looking in in the playoff hunt,

0:34:30.880 --> 0:34:32.759
<v Speaker 4>like we got to get them in over the Browns,

0:34:32.920 --> 0:34:36.160
<v Speaker 4>and you know, like nothing against the Colts, but I'd

0:34:36.239 --> 0:34:41.280
<v Speaker 4>rather see the Texans or the Broncos, or even the Bills,

0:34:41.560 --> 0:34:44.560
<v Speaker 4>Bills or even the Broncos play in the playoffs over.

0:34:44.840 --> 0:34:47.240
<v Speaker 3>The Browns the anyway.

0:34:47.360 --> 0:34:51.080
<v Speaker 4>So yeah, like that is going to incentivize the Bills

0:34:51.080 --> 0:34:53.160
<v Speaker 4>because they are fighting for their lives right now, Like

0:34:53.239 --> 0:34:59.200
<v Speaker 4>they can't afford many more losses, got maybe one more loss, No,

0:34:59.360 --> 0:34:59.959
<v Speaker 4>they really can't.

0:35:00.040 --> 0:35:02.080
<v Speaker 1>The Chiefs can't either. I think that's a great Argument's

0:35:02.200 --> 0:35:04.799
<v Speaker 1>argument I made last week for a game where I said,

0:35:04.840 --> 0:35:06.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, this team just needs this game more than

0:35:06.719 --> 0:35:09.960
<v Speaker 1>the other one and then it turned out to be true.

0:35:10.920 --> 0:35:12.640
<v Speaker 1>And I think to a certain extent you saw that

0:35:12.680 --> 0:35:14.160
<v Speaker 1>on Sunday against the Eagles too. I think the forty

0:35:14.200 --> 0:35:16.600
<v Speaker 1>nine Ers probably needed that game more than the Eagles did,

0:35:16.640 --> 0:35:19.839
<v Speaker 1>and they wanted it more. Sam. I mean, both these

0:35:19.840 --> 0:35:21.920
<v Speaker 1>teams kind of desperately need this game. So at the

0:35:22.000 --> 0:35:23.840
<v Speaker 1>end of the day, how do you how do you

0:35:23.920 --> 0:35:24.359
<v Speaker 1>bet it?

0:35:26.000 --> 0:35:30.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah? I think I leaned the Bills here. I originally

0:35:30.160 --> 0:35:32.760
<v Speaker 2>said that I was going to say that I don't

0:35:33.480 --> 0:35:36.040
<v Speaker 2>have a read on this game and wanted to go

0:35:36.120 --> 0:35:40.000
<v Speaker 2>through the sort of the details of how these teams

0:35:40.080 --> 0:35:42.759
<v Speaker 2>match up a little bit more quickly or excuse me,

0:35:42.800 --> 0:35:46.480
<v Speaker 2>a little bit more deeper. But I just think the

0:35:46.520 --> 0:35:51.720
<v Speaker 2>Bills have just continued to be underrated and their offense

0:35:51.760 --> 0:35:54.960
<v Speaker 2>played extremely other just like not coming out on the

0:35:55.040 --> 0:35:56.680
<v Speaker 2>right side of these these wins.

0:35:56.719 --> 0:35:59.319
<v Speaker 1>No nothing breaks their way. They never have that moment

0:35:59.360 --> 0:36:00.960
<v Speaker 1>that goes their way. They always have that one thing

0:36:00.960 --> 0:36:03.239
<v Speaker 1>that goes against them, or that one moment that you

0:36:03.280 --> 0:36:06.160
<v Speaker 1>know they don't take advantage of. That seems to be

0:36:06.200 --> 0:36:07.840
<v Speaker 1>the whole mo of their twenty three season.

0:36:08.000 --> 0:36:11.799
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and I think coming off the buy, it'll give

0:36:11.840 --> 0:36:17.360
<v Speaker 2>them a chance to reset and have an opportunity to

0:36:17.920 --> 0:36:23.440
<v Speaker 2>again get ready for this massive game and hopefully assert

0:36:23.480 --> 0:36:28.640
<v Speaker 2>themselves as continuing to be one of the best teams

0:36:28.680 --> 0:36:30.040
<v Speaker 2>in the AFC.

0:36:31.480 --> 0:36:35.080
<v Speaker 1>All right, Denver at the Chargers. Denver coming off a

0:36:35.120 --> 0:36:36.719
<v Speaker 1>tough loss, or they are two and a half point

0:36:36.760 --> 0:36:40.160
<v Speaker 1>underdogs going to the Chargers, don't I don't understand this

0:36:40.239 --> 0:36:42.520
<v Speaker 1>at all. Forty three and a half is the number

0:36:42.640 --> 0:36:45.080
<v Speaker 1>plus one twenty five for the Denver Broncos. Give me

0:36:45.080 --> 0:36:48.200
<v Speaker 1>the plus one twenty five. I'm taking the Broncos on

0:36:48.239 --> 0:36:50.840
<v Speaker 1>the money line and I'm not looking back. Sam your thoughts.

0:36:51.200 --> 0:36:52.640
<v Speaker 3>Yes, I agree.

0:36:53.320 --> 0:36:57.720
<v Speaker 2>Denver's turnover loook finally ran out against Houston this past week,

0:36:57.800 --> 0:37:02.480
<v Speaker 2>and where I said Houston falter early, Benver benefited from

0:37:02.480 --> 0:37:05.600
<v Speaker 2>that to an extent, but again they still kept it

0:37:05.640 --> 0:37:08.919
<v Speaker 2>within five points against Uston had a chance to win

0:37:08.960 --> 0:37:13.200
<v Speaker 2>the game. Denver has wanted to rely on their ground game.

0:37:13.239 --> 0:37:15.920
<v Speaker 2>They've had a negative eight percent pass right over expectation

0:37:16.040 --> 0:37:19.319
<v Speaker 2>the last two games, and the Chargers defense can be

0:37:19.520 --> 0:37:22.799
<v Speaker 2>run on. I mean that the Chargers are also just

0:37:23.400 --> 0:37:27.480
<v Speaker 2>lackluster on offense. Quinton Johnston has just been a massive wiff.

0:37:27.520 --> 0:37:31.360
<v Speaker 2>He continues to have some terrible drops. Austin Eckler looks

0:37:31.400 --> 0:37:34.160
<v Speaker 2>like dust at this point. They have just one game

0:37:34.200 --> 0:37:37.600
<v Speaker 2>with a forty five percent success rate since Week four,

0:37:37.640 --> 0:37:41.200
<v Speaker 2>and that was against the Lions defense that we mentioned

0:37:41.719 --> 0:37:46.360
<v Speaker 2>has been historically terrible. So I like the Broncos here

0:37:46.520 --> 0:37:49.880
<v Speaker 2>like it. It sounds secretly just to say at this

0:37:50.040 --> 0:37:53.760
<v Speaker 2>point given the quarterbacks on either side, but it hasn't

0:37:53.800 --> 0:37:56.759
<v Speaker 2>looked pretty at all for Los Angeles.

0:37:57.560 --> 0:38:00.160
<v Speaker 1>No. I mean in La pat is not a home

0:38:00.200 --> 0:38:03.400
<v Speaker 1>field advantage, so throw that out the window too. Brandon

0:38:03.400 --> 0:38:05.400
<v Speaker 1>Staley got lucky last week that he came out with

0:38:05.400 --> 0:38:07.799
<v Speaker 1>a victory here against the Patriots team that can't do

0:38:07.960 --> 0:38:11.960
<v Speaker 1>anything offensively. But I think Denver bounces back here in

0:38:11.960 --> 0:38:13.719
<v Speaker 1>a big way and look, regardless of his loss of

0:38:13.760 --> 0:38:16.440
<v Speaker 1>the Texans, you know, I still think Denver to make

0:38:16.480 --> 0:38:18.360
<v Speaker 1>the playoffs is a fascinating bet. I talked about it

0:38:18.400 --> 0:38:20.080
<v Speaker 1>last week on my Best Bets video. I feel like,

0:38:20.560 --> 0:38:22.359
<v Speaker 1>you look at the schedule they have. They've got two

0:38:22.400 --> 0:38:24.440
<v Speaker 1>games against the Chargers, they got a game against the Raiders,

0:38:24.440 --> 0:38:26.080
<v Speaker 1>like they can handle their business and still get the

0:38:26.080 --> 0:38:26.759
<v Speaker 1>ten wins here.

0:38:27.960 --> 0:38:30.319
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, it does feel like the value is with the

0:38:30.360 --> 0:38:35.360
<v Speaker 4>Broncos but I cannot shake this paranoid feeling that this game.

0:38:35.280 --> 0:38:39.400
<v Speaker 3>Is a trap, Like I just can't. I mean, like

0:38:39.440 --> 0:38:40.239
<v Speaker 3>I want to see it.

0:38:40.200 --> 0:38:42.640
<v Speaker 4>The way you guys see it, and it does feel like,

0:38:43.320 --> 0:38:45.480
<v Speaker 4>you know, as you said, Joe, not the traditional home

0:38:45.520 --> 0:38:49.040
<v Speaker 4>field advantage for the Chargers, the Broncos with you know,

0:38:49.120 --> 0:38:51.480
<v Speaker 4>a lot of momentum going into that Texans game. And

0:38:51.520 --> 0:38:54.680
<v Speaker 4>it wasn't like they played terribly in that game, you know,

0:38:54.840 --> 0:38:58.640
<v Speaker 4>until committing the turnovers at the end. So boy, I

0:38:58.960 --> 0:39:00.839
<v Speaker 4>do want to like the Bronx goes in this one.

0:39:00.880 --> 0:39:04.920
<v Speaker 3>But man, I just there's a bad feeling I cannot shake.

0:39:05.160 --> 0:39:06.040
<v Speaker 3>I watched this game.

0:39:06.200 --> 0:39:08.600
<v Speaker 1>Go watch some more tape of Brandon sdally coach football games.

0:39:08.640 --> 0:39:12.799
<v Speaker 1>I think it'll bring you around. Philadelphia Eagles Dallas Cowboys.

0:39:12.920 --> 0:39:15.800
<v Speaker 1>This is the one Sunday Night football. Get ready, folks.

0:39:15.880 --> 0:39:18.360
<v Speaker 1>Three and a half point favorites are the Dallas Cowboys.

0:39:18.440 --> 0:39:21.600
<v Speaker 1>Fifty two fifty two and a half is the number

0:39:21.600 --> 0:39:24.520
<v Speaker 1>plus one fifty for the Eagles. So Pat has the

0:39:24.560 --> 0:39:26.959
<v Speaker 1>gauntlet finally caught up with the Eagles that they running

0:39:26.960 --> 0:39:29.160
<v Speaker 1>out of steam or do they bounce back here after

0:39:29.200 --> 0:39:31.880
<v Speaker 1>a tough home loss against the Cowboys, who you know,

0:39:32.120 --> 0:39:33.960
<v Speaker 1>they've been their daddy for the last couple of years.

0:39:34.960 --> 0:39:37.960
<v Speaker 4>I am leaning the Cowboys here, and this would have

0:39:38.120 --> 0:39:40.879
<v Speaker 4>sounded crazy if anyone would have said it a year ago.

0:39:41.040 --> 0:39:43.600
<v Speaker 4>But I don't know if Jalen Hurts can go toe

0:39:43.640 --> 0:39:47.440
<v Speaker 4>to toe against Dak Prescott as a passer.

0:39:47.280 --> 0:39:47.960
<v Speaker 3>In this game.

0:39:48.120 --> 0:39:51.480
<v Speaker 4>Like I Dak has just been so hot, and this

0:39:52.320 --> 0:39:54.920
<v Speaker 4>Dallas passing game is functioning at such a high level.

0:39:55.120 --> 0:39:58.480
<v Speaker 4>And meanwhile, I don't think we are seeing anything close

0:39:58.520 --> 0:40:00.920
<v Speaker 4>to the sort of success Jalen Hurts had through the

0:40:00.960 --> 0:40:05.080
<v Speaker 4>air last year. Like you know, like there's some big plays,

0:40:05.160 --> 0:40:08.479
<v Speaker 4>some splash plays to AJ Brown. Yes, of course we've

0:40:08.520 --> 0:40:11.080
<v Speaker 4>seen that. But if this game does turn into the

0:40:11.080 --> 0:40:14.640
<v Speaker 4>shootout that the total suggests is, it's going to be man.

0:40:14.680 --> 0:40:17.520
<v Speaker 4>I would much rather roll with Dak than with Jalen Hurts.

0:40:17.560 --> 0:40:20.960
<v Speaker 4>And by the way, this Eagles pass defense is such

0:40:20.960 --> 0:40:23.120
<v Speaker 4>an achilles heel, Like if they cannot get to the

0:40:23.200 --> 0:40:26.719
<v Speaker 4>quarterback and they didn't get to Brock Purty on Sunday, like,

0:40:27.360 --> 0:40:30.880
<v Speaker 4>those cornerbacks are defenseless, and I think Cede Lamb is

0:40:30.920 --> 0:40:33.759
<v Speaker 4>just going to rampage against this Eagles secondary.

0:40:34.160 --> 0:40:37.200
<v Speaker 1>Dak, Jalen Hurts brock Purty are nearly all tied for

0:40:37.280 --> 0:40:40.600
<v Speaker 1>the MVP voting right now in terms of Vegas odds,

0:40:40.680 --> 0:40:43.520
<v Speaker 1>So Sam, this has a lot at stake here, not

0:40:43.560 --> 0:40:46.400
<v Speaker 1>just for the NFC, but also for maybe MVP. Is

0:40:46.400 --> 0:40:48.759
<v Speaker 1>this a statement game for DAK or a bounce back

0:40:48.800 --> 0:40:49.360
<v Speaker 1>for the Eagles?

0:40:50.040 --> 0:40:53.600
<v Speaker 2>I think it's a statement game for Dak. To Pat's point,

0:40:53.640 --> 0:40:57.680
<v Speaker 2>the Eagles secondary has been a weakness for them all season.

0:40:57.760 --> 0:41:00.759
<v Speaker 2>You saw them get torn apart against San Francisco this

0:41:00.800 --> 0:41:05.480
<v Speaker 2>past week. Dak is I think whichever quarterback wins this

0:41:05.560 --> 0:41:08.120
<v Speaker 2>game probably comes out at the top of the MVP

0:41:08.360 --> 0:41:14.239
<v Speaker 2>market afterwards. I just I don't see how Philadelphia is

0:41:14.280 --> 0:41:17.759
<v Speaker 2>able to keep up with with Dallas. I mean, I

0:41:17.840 --> 0:41:21.000
<v Speaker 2>think they can, but Jalen Hurts has been hobbled the

0:41:21.040 --> 0:41:23.600
<v Speaker 2>last couple of weeks, left the game for a little bit.

0:41:23.600 --> 0:41:25.920
<v Speaker 2>I don't remember if he missed any any plays in

0:41:26.000 --> 0:41:29.840
<v Speaker 2>the game against San Francisco, but clearly dealing with some

0:41:30.520 --> 0:41:34.239
<v Speaker 2>lingering issues that I think are limiting his mobility a

0:41:34.280 --> 0:41:39.799
<v Speaker 2>little bit. And Dallas just again they I think Thursday

0:41:39.920 --> 0:41:44.600
<v Speaker 2>night was the potential one spot where again they maybe

0:41:45.800 --> 0:41:48.879
<v Speaker 2>falter a little bit and variants doesn't go their way

0:41:48.920 --> 0:41:51.000
<v Speaker 2>and they got through it. I mean, similar to the

0:41:51.000 --> 0:41:53.760
<v Speaker 2>way the Eagles have have been getting through their games,

0:41:54.400 --> 0:41:58.400
<v Speaker 2>you know, all season. So give me Dallas. I I'm

0:41:58.480 --> 0:41:59.719
<v Speaker 2>excited to watch this game.

0:42:00.320 --> 0:42:02.279
<v Speaker 1>All right. We got not one, but two Monday night

0:42:02.320 --> 0:42:05.680
<v Speaker 1>games too, Green Bay, New York Giants. The Giants thirty

0:42:05.719 --> 0:42:07.480
<v Speaker 1>seven is the number. They are six and a half

0:42:07.480 --> 0:42:10.240
<v Speaker 1>point underdogs at home to your Green Bay Packers. Gentlemen,

0:42:10.280 --> 0:42:12.359
<v Speaker 1>all these primetime Packer games, you gotta be loving this

0:42:12.640 --> 0:42:16.560
<v Speaker 1>plus two forty for the Giants upset. So Sam, you

0:42:16.680 --> 0:42:19.040
<v Speaker 1>still spreading the love with Jordan. You're still feeling really

0:42:19.040 --> 0:42:22.080
<v Speaker 1>good about this guy who's now three games, eight touchdowns,

0:42:22.080 --> 0:42:24.160
<v Speaker 1>no picks. I know, probably not gonna have Christian Watson

0:42:24.239 --> 0:42:26.400
<v Speaker 1>this game, but does it matter against the Giants?

0:42:26.840 --> 0:42:29.600
<v Speaker 2>No, it doesn't. Give me. Give me the Packers. The

0:42:30.280 --> 0:42:32.960
<v Speaker 2>Packers just recorded zero point two to sixty pa per

0:42:32.960 --> 0:42:35.600
<v Speaker 2>play and a forty eight point six percent success rate

0:42:35.680 --> 0:42:38.279
<v Speaker 2>against one of the best defenses in the league. It

0:42:38.320 --> 0:42:41.320
<v Speaker 2>was Green Bay's best performance of the season on offense

0:42:41.320 --> 0:42:46.240
<v Speaker 2>in Kansas City's worst performance on defense this season. Tyrod

0:42:46.320 --> 0:42:49.759
<v Speaker 2>Taylor could be at quarterback here for the Giants, but

0:42:50.280 --> 0:42:53.200
<v Speaker 2>that team hasn't had a success rate on offense over

0:42:53.320 --> 0:42:56.960
<v Speaker 2>forty percent since Week eight. The Packers are gonna go

0:42:57.080 --> 0:43:01.320
<v Speaker 2>into MetLife Stadium and Teor Park this Giants team.

0:43:01.880 --> 0:43:04.080
<v Speaker 1>All right, Pat, are you co signing that?

0:43:05.160 --> 0:43:07.920
<v Speaker 4>Yeah? Joe, this is our second year doing this show together,

0:43:08.040 --> 0:43:10.600
<v Speaker 4>so you you can attest that. I am not like

0:43:10.680 --> 0:43:14.239
<v Speaker 4>an overt Green Bay Packers homer from a betting perspective,

0:43:14.239 --> 0:43:16.000
<v Speaker 4>If anything, I tend to be a pessimist.

0:43:16.120 --> 0:43:19.440
<v Speaker 3>So but I like them against the Chiefs.

0:43:19.160 --> 0:43:22.319
<v Speaker 4>Last week, and I was pretty surprised when I saw

0:43:22.360 --> 0:43:26.120
<v Speaker 4>how modest this number was. Only I think they're more

0:43:26.160 --> 0:43:30.040
<v Speaker 4>than a touchdown better than the Giants, whether it's Tyrod

0:43:30.080 --> 0:43:33.279
<v Speaker 4>Taylor or our guy Tommy DeVito, like he's gonna run

0:43:33.280 --> 0:43:37.120
<v Speaker 4>into trouble like this. Packers past defense is legit. You

0:43:37.120 --> 0:43:39.160
<v Speaker 4>can run on the Packers, but it's really hard to

0:43:39.200 --> 0:43:42.160
<v Speaker 4>throw on the Packers. So I don't think you're gonna

0:43:42.160 --> 0:43:45.360
<v Speaker 4>see the Giants move the ball consistently. And you know,

0:43:45.520 --> 0:43:47.359
<v Speaker 4>Jordan Love's on a roll bet the hot hand.

0:43:48.120 --> 0:43:50.120
<v Speaker 1>Tua is also in a role, so its Tyreek Hill.

0:43:50.120 --> 0:43:52.000
<v Speaker 1>The Miami Dolphins will close us out here with the

0:43:52.040 --> 0:43:56.040
<v Speaker 1>other Monday night game thirteen point favorites minus one ten

0:43:56.120 --> 0:43:58.280
<v Speaker 1>or the Miami Dolphins at home against the Titans. Forty

0:43:58.320 --> 0:44:01.399
<v Speaker 1>seven is the number plus five fifty for the Titans upset. Look,

0:44:01.440 --> 0:44:04.560
<v Speaker 1>Miami has been all year. They take care of lesser teams.

0:44:04.600 --> 0:44:06.799
<v Speaker 1>It's beating the big boys where they struggle. So it's

0:44:06.800 --> 0:44:10.399
<v Speaker 1>just another Miami romp where you just can't stop all

0:44:10.480 --> 0:44:13.080
<v Speaker 1>the speed. I mean, moster has fourteen touchdowns already, eight

0:44:13.120 --> 0:44:16.719
<v Speaker 1>Chan has this is right in HM has six touchdowns

0:44:16.960 --> 0:44:20.600
<v Speaker 1>in or something in six games. He's played something crazy

0:44:20.600 --> 0:44:21.719
<v Speaker 1>like that. I gotta look at this that I heard

0:44:21.760 --> 0:44:23.440
<v Speaker 1>it this morning. I was like, that doesn't even seem right.

0:44:23.840 --> 0:44:26.839
<v Speaker 1>But Tyree kill the rest of this offense, pat they've

0:44:26.840 --> 0:44:29.400
<v Speaker 1>been so good. Is this gonna be in just another

0:44:29.480 --> 0:44:31.399
<v Speaker 1>role to a double digit victory? Yet again?

0:44:32.280 --> 0:44:33.960
<v Speaker 4>Oh, I know in the pools where I have to

0:44:33.960 --> 0:44:36.239
<v Speaker 4>bet this, I'm probably gonna bet the Dolphins. But it's

0:44:36.440 --> 0:44:39.239
<v Speaker 4>just the number is where it should be and I'm

0:44:39.280 --> 0:44:41.480
<v Speaker 4>not seeing enough value to bet the Dolphins.

0:44:41.680 --> 0:44:43.640
<v Speaker 1>Nine touchdowns in six games, that's what it was for

0:44:43.640 --> 0:44:45.239
<v Speaker 1>a champ. By the way, in the sixth healthies games

0:44:45.280 --> 0:44:47.960
<v Speaker 1>he's had, he's at nine touchdowns. Sam, what do you

0:44:47.960 --> 0:44:49.319
<v Speaker 1>think about this one. You got any love for this

0:44:49.360 --> 0:44:49.960
<v Speaker 1>game early on?

0:44:50.880 --> 0:44:53.839
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think I take the Dolphins here too. Derek

0:44:53.880 --> 0:44:57.400
<v Speaker 2>Henry is in concussion protocol. I doubt he plays. Jeffrey

0:44:57.440 --> 0:44:59.720
<v Speaker 2>Simmons for the Titans defense.

0:44:59.760 --> 0:45:00.480
<v Speaker 3>Got up.

0:45:00.480 --> 0:45:04.600
<v Speaker 2>The Titans pasty has been atrocious all year. And you

0:45:04.640 --> 0:45:07.600
<v Speaker 2>know then now you gotta face the Dolphins, which you

0:45:07.640 --> 0:45:11.200
<v Speaker 2>have one of the best passing offenses in the league.

0:45:11.440 --> 0:45:14.400
<v Speaker 2>I'm I don't know how I feel about this Monday

0:45:14.480 --> 0:45:18.160
<v Speaker 2>night doubleheader, especially with both of them playing at the

0:45:18.160 --> 0:45:20.640
<v Speaker 2>same time. But eh, whatever, more football.

0:45:20.800 --> 0:45:22.840
<v Speaker 1>You go back and forth. I mean, I mean for

0:45:22.880 --> 0:45:24.680
<v Speaker 1>you guys, it's a little tougher as the Packer fans,

0:45:24.680 --> 0:45:27.480
<v Speaker 1>but for us general football fans, it's fun. I'll watch

0:45:27.560 --> 0:45:30.279
<v Speaker 1>Tyreek Hill every time Will Levis has got the ball.

0:45:30.320 --> 0:45:32.200
<v Speaker 1>That's why I switch back over to the Packer game.

0:45:32.400 --> 0:45:34.120
<v Speaker 1>That's how I think I'm going to approach this one.

0:45:34.160 --> 0:45:36.640
<v Speaker 1>But again, make sure you're approaching all of your bets

0:45:37.080 --> 0:45:38.960
<v Speaker 1>the right way, using the betting pros app get the

0:45:39.000 --> 0:45:42.120
<v Speaker 1>best lines, the best time set the notifications, you get,

0:45:42.120 --> 0:45:44.640
<v Speaker 1>the line alerts, and also don't forget about our NFL contest.

0:45:44.719 --> 0:45:46.320
<v Speaker 1>Make your picks count. There's so plenty of time to

0:45:46.360 --> 0:45:49.880
<v Speaker 1>win free stuff here. We've got weekly prizes, monthly prizes

0:45:49.920 --> 0:45:53.160
<v Speaker 1>for our NFL contest joined today Betting Pros dot Com

0:45:53.160 --> 0:45:55.360
<v Speaker 1>slash NFL Contest. That's the way to do it. Or

0:45:55.440 --> 0:45:57.040
<v Speaker 1>just download the app and go to the community tab

0:45:57.080 --> 0:45:59.560
<v Speaker 1>and click that bad boy and go sign up there.

0:45:59.640 --> 0:46:03.000
<v Speaker 1>It's just make five picks a week and a weekly prize.

0:46:03.040 --> 0:46:05.960
<v Speaker 1>Every single week we're giving away swag to our FPMBP shops.

0:46:05.960 --> 0:46:09.360
<v Speaker 1>We're also doing monthly prizes too. Month of December just started,

0:46:09.600 --> 0:46:11.400
<v Speaker 1>so you can win an upgrade to Betting Pros or

0:46:11.440 --> 0:46:14.920
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Pros Premium just for making picks. That sounds good

0:46:14.960 --> 0:46:16.800
<v Speaker 1>to me, And don't forget to drop your comments below.

0:46:16.880 --> 0:46:19.680
<v Speaker 1>Tell us who you are in on this week in

0:46:19.719 --> 0:46:21.799
<v Speaker 1>the NFL. What's your favorite game of the week. I

0:46:21.840 --> 0:46:24.360
<v Speaker 1>want to hear from you. Drop your comments below and

0:46:24.400 --> 0:46:27.960
<v Speaker 1>shout out again to brock Perty and the forty nine ers. Yes,

0:46:28.040 --> 0:46:31.160
<v Speaker 1>stuff the big fat L in my mouth and I

0:46:31.280 --> 0:46:33.399
<v Speaker 1>will take the L. I will chew on it all

0:46:33.440 --> 0:46:35.719
<v Speaker 1>the way until on Friday show which will we must

0:46:35.760 --> 0:46:38.799
<v Speaker 1>be television what Welsh gets to basically rated over me?

0:46:38.840 --> 0:46:40.560
<v Speaker 1>Which is gonna be fun? You think I was an

0:46:40.560 --> 0:46:42.960
<v Speaker 1>Eagles fan, but I'm not. That'll do it for us,

0:46:43.000 --> 0:46:44.879
<v Speaker 1>But the story of the game goes on for Sam

0:46:44.920 --> 0:46:47.920
<v Speaker 1>and Pat. I'm Joey P. We'll see you next time. Kids.

0:46:49.920 --> 0:46:52.680
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening to the Betting Pros podcast. If you

0:46:52.719 --> 0:46:55.080
<v Speaker 1>love the show, the best freeway to support us is

0:46:55.080 --> 0:46:58.520
<v Speaker 1>by leaving a positive review on Apple Podcasts or Spotify.

0:46:58.840 --> 0:47:01.480
<v Speaker 1>Follow us on x and TikTok at Betting Pros and

0:47:01.560 --> 0:47:03.400
<v Speaker 1>Instagram at Betting Pros NFL.

0:47:03.840 --> 0:47:06.719
<v Speaker 4>Also subscribe to our YouTube channel at YouTube dot com

0:47:06.760 --> 0:47:07.720
<v Speaker 4>slash Betting Pros.