1 00:00:00,720 --> 00:00:03,680 Speaker 1: Hey, guys, ready or not, twenty twenty four is here 2 00:00:03,800 --> 00:00:06,280 Speaker 1: and we here at breaking points, are already thinking of 3 00:00:06,320 --> 00:00:08,559 Speaker 1: ways we can up our game for this critical election. 4 00:00:08,760 --> 00:00:11,680 Speaker 1: We rely on our premium subs to expand coverage, upgrade 5 00:00:11,680 --> 00:00:15,080 Speaker 1: the studio ad staff, give you, guys, the best independent 6 00:00:15,120 --> 00:00:17,400 Speaker 1: coverage that is possible. If you like what we're all about, 7 00:00:17,640 --> 00:00:20,040 Speaker 1: it just means the absolute world to have your support. 8 00:00:20,120 --> 00:00:39,920 Speaker 1: But enough with that, let's get to the show. Good morning, everybody, 9 00:00:39,920 --> 00:00:42,320 Speaker 1: Happy Thursday. We have an amazing show for everybody today. 10 00:00:42,320 --> 00:00:44,000 Speaker 1: What do we have, Crystal, Indeed, we do lots of 11 00:00:44,000 --> 00:00:46,879 Speaker 1: interesting things to break down this morning. We have some 12 00:00:47,000 --> 00:00:49,760 Speaker 1: fallout from the Trump indictments this week, and in particular 13 00:00:49,800 --> 00:00:51,960 Speaker 1: a little bit of a media react segment that we 14 00:00:52,000 --> 00:00:54,280 Speaker 1: want to break down for you how everybody handled the 15 00:00:54,280 --> 00:00:58,160 Speaker 1: big news. We also have some new revelations. This pretty 16 00:00:58,160 --> 00:01:02,440 Speaker 1: interesting comment's coming out of Kiev. Largest openness that they 17 00:01:02,440 --> 00:01:05,920 Speaker 1: have expressed in terms of diplomatic negotiations that we have seen. 18 00:01:05,959 --> 00:01:09,800 Speaker 1: This comes as France is meeting with China and expressing 19 00:01:09,800 --> 00:01:12,240 Speaker 1: also openness to China playing a role as peacemaker there. 20 00:01:12,280 --> 00:01:14,000 Speaker 1: So we'll break all of that down for you. We 21 00:01:14,040 --> 00:01:17,120 Speaker 1: also have a whole new story again on the nord 22 00:01:17,120 --> 00:01:21,440 Speaker 1: stream pipeline, and some open admissions that members of NATO 23 00:01:21,520 --> 00:01:23,399 Speaker 1: are just like, yeah, we just kind of don't really 24 00:01:23,440 --> 00:01:26,559 Speaker 1: want to know. It was like openly admitting, like it's uncomfortable, 25 00:01:26,600 --> 00:01:28,880 Speaker 1: so let's just not talk about it. We've got some 26 00:01:28,959 --> 00:01:32,360 Speaker 1: big twenty twenty four fundraising numbers Nikki Haley with a 27 00:01:32,360 --> 00:01:34,880 Speaker 1: big hull that we can break down for you. And 28 00:01:34,920 --> 00:01:37,160 Speaker 1: we also have a couple of media stories that we 29 00:01:37,160 --> 00:01:41,520 Speaker 1: couldn't resist covering one elon designating NPR on Twitter as 30 00:01:41,600 --> 00:01:46,360 Speaker 1: state affiliated media that caused a whole thing, and some 31 00:01:46,440 --> 00:01:50,560 Speaker 1: pretty bombshell revelations about Don Lemon's behavior going back years 32 00:01:51,040 --> 00:01:53,200 Speaker 1: at CNN, so that'll be interesting. I also excited to 33 00:01:53,240 --> 00:01:55,240 Speaker 1: have a first time on the show to talk about 34 00:01:55,280 --> 00:01:58,240 Speaker 1: the Chicago mayor's race, so should be a good one. 35 00:01:58,440 --> 00:02:00,640 Speaker 1: Before we get to any of that, though, reminder about 36 00:02:00,680 --> 00:02:03,320 Speaker 1: Spotify video. That's right, you can watch the full video 37 00:02:03,480 --> 00:02:06,000 Speaker 1: on Spotify for all of our premium members who pay 38 00:02:06,000 --> 00:02:09,040 Speaker 1: for the show Breakingpoints dot Com to become a premium subscriber, 39 00:02:09,080 --> 00:02:10,800 Speaker 1: you can go and connect it to your Spotify feed 40 00:02:10,840 --> 00:02:13,160 Speaker 1: and boom voila, you can watch it there. I know 41 00:02:13,200 --> 00:02:14,480 Speaker 1: a lot of you have been taking advantage. I was 42 00:02:14,480 --> 00:02:15,760 Speaker 1: looking at the numbers and I was like, wow, a 43 00:02:15,840 --> 00:02:18,320 Speaker 1: huge portion of our audience is actually using this. Oh 44 00:02:18,360 --> 00:02:20,560 Speaker 1: really Yeah, absolutely, and apparently we are one of the 45 00:02:20,639 --> 00:02:24,280 Speaker 1: largest gated podcasts on all of Spotify, which is not bad. Guys, 46 00:02:24,400 --> 00:02:26,280 Speaker 1: thank you all very much. We really appreciate it. So 47 00:02:26,360 --> 00:02:28,960 Speaker 1: Breakingpoints dot Com, as I said, that's the reminder. But 48 00:02:29,240 --> 00:02:31,960 Speaker 1: how did the media handle the Trump arrest and the 49 00:02:31,960 --> 00:02:34,520 Speaker 1: subsequent coverage, Crystal, Yeah, So, to be honest with you, 50 00:02:34,600 --> 00:02:38,160 Speaker 1: I kind of empathize with the bind that media organizations 51 00:02:38,200 --> 00:02:40,880 Speaker 1: are in because you know, we don't love spending a 52 00:02:40,919 --> 00:02:43,160 Speaker 1: lot of time on ten No, I actually hate doing it. Yeah, 53 00:02:43,200 --> 00:02:46,079 Speaker 1: it distracts from a lot of other really important issues. 54 00:02:46,120 --> 00:02:48,000 Speaker 1: But then again, when you have a former president of 55 00:02:48,000 --> 00:02:50,800 Speaker 1: the United States being indicted for the first time in history, 56 00:02:51,200 --> 00:02:52,880 Speaker 1: you kind of have to cover it, at least to 57 00:02:52,919 --> 00:02:58,200 Speaker 1: some extent. So MSNBC sparked a lot of debate, I 58 00:02:58,200 --> 00:03:01,720 Speaker 1: think over their handling of it because they decided that 59 00:03:01,800 --> 00:03:05,640 Speaker 1: they would not carry live Trump's speech that he gave 60 00:03:05,720 --> 00:03:08,359 Speaker 1: in response to those charges and a number of other 61 00:03:08,400 --> 00:03:12,320 Speaker 1: potential charges coming down both Pike so Rachel Mattow explained, 62 00:03:12,360 --> 00:03:14,679 Speaker 1: they're thinking on not taking that speech. Let's take a 63 00:03:14,680 --> 00:03:16,120 Speaker 1: listen to what she has to say. I need to 64 00:03:16,120 --> 00:03:19,480 Speaker 1: tell you that right now, the former president himself is 65 00:03:19,520 --> 00:03:22,880 Speaker 1: making remarks tonight from his home in Florida, as far 66 00:03:22,919 --> 00:03:24,280 Speaker 1: as we can tell, and what we were prepared for 67 00:03:24,320 --> 00:03:26,679 Speaker 1: here is that this is basically a campaign speech in 68 00:03:26,720 --> 00:03:29,480 Speaker 1: which he is repeating his same lives and allegations against 69 00:03:29,560 --> 00:03:32,880 Speaker 1: his perceived enemies. It is just getting started. So far, 70 00:03:32,880 --> 00:03:35,320 Speaker 1: he's just giving his normal list of grievances. We don't 71 00:03:35,320 --> 00:03:37,760 Speaker 1: consider that necessarily newsworthy, and there's a cost to us 72 00:03:37,760 --> 00:03:41,800 Speaker 1: as a news organization of knowingly broadcasting untrue things. So 73 00:03:42,360 --> 00:03:44,800 Speaker 1: our deal with you is that we will monitor these remarks. 74 00:03:44,840 --> 00:03:47,120 Speaker 1: If he does say anything newsworthy, we will turn them 75 00:03:47,120 --> 00:03:49,640 Speaker 1: around and report on that right away. But for now, 76 00:03:49,720 --> 00:03:52,040 Speaker 1: just know that it's happening and we're not taking it. 77 00:03:52,480 --> 00:03:54,600 Speaker 1: So just know that it's happening, we're not taking it. 78 00:03:54,640 --> 00:03:57,040 Speaker 1: So listen. I think all of these decisions should be 79 00:03:57,240 --> 00:04:00,560 Speaker 1: considered through the lens of business, decisions to do with 80 00:04:00,600 --> 00:04:04,120 Speaker 1: like their journalistic ethics or whatever. Their audience doesn't particularly 81 00:04:04,120 --> 00:04:06,160 Speaker 1: want to hear a long speech from Trump, so they're 82 00:04:06,200 --> 00:04:08,040 Speaker 1: not going to play it. They would rather hear, you know, 83 00:04:08,080 --> 00:04:10,920 Speaker 1: analysis from Rachel and Nicole Wallace and whoever else that 84 00:04:10,960 --> 00:04:13,360 Speaker 1: they have on the panel. Joy, it's not like they're 85 00:04:13,400 --> 00:04:17,040 Speaker 1: not covering Trump. They probably cover Trump more than any 86 00:04:17,040 --> 00:04:19,480 Speaker 1: other network. So it's not like they actually learned, Hey, 87 00:04:19,560 --> 00:04:22,080 Speaker 1: let's not give this guy any oxygen because it only 88 00:04:22,160 --> 00:04:25,080 Speaker 1: empowers him. No, they just feel like their audience doesn't 89 00:04:25,120 --> 00:04:27,159 Speaker 1: particularly want to hear directly for him from him, So 90 00:04:27,200 --> 00:04:29,600 Speaker 1: they're making a business ratings decision. In my opinion, Oh, 91 00:04:29,640 --> 00:04:31,520 Speaker 1: I think you're right. I also do think there is 92 00:04:31,560 --> 00:04:34,240 Speaker 1: a powerful brainworm over there where the idea that they 93 00:04:34,240 --> 00:04:38,120 Speaker 1: have a quote responsibility, whereas if they never would have 94 00:04:38,200 --> 00:04:43,360 Speaker 1: broadcast knowingly lies on their platform, that's never happened. Rachel 95 00:04:43,440 --> 00:04:46,840 Speaker 1: Maddout and Nicole Wallace, Rachel the dgin of they don't 96 00:04:46,880 --> 00:04:49,880 Speaker 1: get journalistic fact fighting. People don't care about the truth. 97 00:04:50,000 --> 00:04:53,120 Speaker 1: It's all such a joke. I mean, they are paralyzed 98 00:04:53,160 --> 00:04:55,440 Speaker 1: by the decision that they have the humorist that they 99 00:04:55,480 --> 00:04:57,600 Speaker 1: believe that they got Trump elected in the first place, 100 00:04:57,600 --> 00:05:00,279 Speaker 1: which I don't believe that actually for a second. But really, 101 00:05:00,320 --> 00:05:03,000 Speaker 1: what it comes down to for them is, as you said, 102 00:05:03,240 --> 00:05:06,960 Speaker 1: they are in a bind where their audience doesn't want 103 00:05:07,000 --> 00:05:10,560 Speaker 1: to see the actual newsworthy event. They want to see 104 00:05:10,920 --> 00:05:15,160 Speaker 1: Rachel and Nicole and Joy all breaking down what's happening. 105 00:05:15,360 --> 00:05:17,839 Speaker 1: You know, whenever we covered it on our stream, we 106 00:05:17,920 --> 00:05:20,360 Speaker 1: gave people a preview, and then, because we knew it 107 00:05:20,440 --> 00:05:24,039 Speaker 1: was a newsworthy event live taking problem, we brought everybody 108 00:05:24,120 --> 00:05:27,000 Speaker 1: the full thing. You can watch it for yourself. We 109 00:05:27,080 --> 00:05:30,280 Speaker 1: will tell you what we think afterwards, but in real time. 110 00:05:30,600 --> 00:05:34,080 Speaker 1: What I've always found astounding about these critiques from these 111 00:05:34,160 --> 00:05:37,840 Speaker 1: journalistic professors and all these other little hall monitors is 112 00:05:38,080 --> 00:05:40,960 Speaker 1: they don't want people to just see something for themselves 113 00:05:41,120 --> 00:05:44,160 Speaker 1: and make up their own minds. They don't trust Americans enough. 114 00:05:44,160 --> 00:05:46,200 Speaker 1: It's a good point to watch this and just say, yeah, 115 00:05:46,240 --> 00:05:48,120 Speaker 1: I think that's a lie, and I think that's oh 116 00:05:48,160 --> 00:05:50,560 Speaker 1: that was kind of funny. But oh, here's what I 117 00:05:50,560 --> 00:05:52,960 Speaker 1: think after watching the full thing. Why do you mean 118 00:05:53,000 --> 00:05:54,840 Speaker 1: them to tell you? I think that's a great point. 119 00:05:54,960 --> 00:05:57,800 Speaker 1: There's kind of a nanny state, yes, dude, implicit there 120 00:05:57,920 --> 00:05:59,960 Speaker 1: that goes along with their whole like freak own of 121 00:06:00,080 --> 00:06:02,240 Speaker 1: or misinformation and oh my god, we've got to like 122 00:06:02,320 --> 00:06:05,040 Speaker 1: sensor and crack down, and we can't have these untruths 123 00:06:05,040 --> 00:06:09,080 Speaker 1: out there whatsoever. Rather than trusting in a democracy people 124 00:06:09,120 --> 00:06:11,160 Speaker 1: to you know, be able to see the live news 125 00:06:11,160 --> 00:06:13,960 Speaker 1: event in unvarnished format and then make of it what 126 00:06:14,000 --> 00:06:16,680 Speaker 1: they will, you know, based on their own facts and knowledge. 127 00:06:16,680 --> 00:06:18,560 Speaker 1: And then yeah, with the aid of like, you know, 128 00:06:18,680 --> 00:06:21,279 Speaker 1: reasonable analysis on the other side, not that I expect 129 00:06:21,480 --> 00:06:23,839 Speaker 1: as NBC to provide any of that. So I do 130 00:06:23,920 --> 00:06:27,480 Speaker 1: think you're right that there is an implicit like obsession 131 00:06:27,560 --> 00:06:31,760 Speaker 1: with controlling the flow of information that's reflected in that 132 00:06:32,120 --> 00:06:35,040 Speaker 1: decision as well as you know it just being a 133 00:06:35,120 --> 00:06:38,320 Speaker 1: sort of like brass tacks business decision. Now on the 134 00:06:38,400 --> 00:06:42,120 Speaker 1: other end of absurdity with CNN, which we talked about 135 00:06:42,200 --> 00:06:44,760 Speaker 1: on our live stream, you know, again, we made sure 136 00:06:44,839 --> 00:06:48,279 Speaker 1: to thoroughly cover the event. Obviously, we gave it, you know, 137 00:06:48,480 --> 00:06:51,640 Speaker 1: significant attention as well, because it is a historic event, 138 00:06:51,680 --> 00:06:53,880 Speaker 1: and we had legal analysts on and we took the 139 00:06:53,880 --> 00:06:56,400 Speaker 1: Trump presser live, and we went through the indictment all 140 00:06:56,440 --> 00:06:59,520 Speaker 1: of that. But CNN goes that next level above just 141 00:06:59,560 --> 00:07:02,320 Speaker 1: like fully analyzing what's going on, and they have to 142 00:07:02,360 --> 00:07:07,919 Speaker 1: do these like sensationalistic oj Car Chase type shots showing 143 00:07:07,960 --> 00:07:11,440 Speaker 1: the suburban pulling in front of the courthouse and mounting 144 00:07:11,480 --> 00:07:14,239 Speaker 1: a camera on the speeding boat to try to catch 145 00:07:14,240 --> 00:07:16,800 Speaker 1: an image of his plane landing in New York and 146 00:07:16,880 --> 00:07:19,760 Speaker 1: all of this stuff. So they go to the total opposite, 147 00:07:20,040 --> 00:07:24,080 Speaker 1: just total sensationalistic extreme. Jake Tapper felt they need to 148 00:07:24,200 --> 00:07:26,920 Speaker 1: justify that. In his commentary listic listen to what he 149 00:07:26,960 --> 00:07:29,640 Speaker 1: had to say. And I know that media critics are 150 00:07:30,200 --> 00:07:32,760 Speaker 1: taking issue with the way that a lot of the 151 00:07:32,800 --> 00:07:34,960 Speaker 1: news networks are covering this, but I have to say, 152 00:07:36,520 --> 00:07:40,760 Speaker 1: you know, as we watch Donald Trump's limo drive on 153 00:07:40,800 --> 00:07:47,160 Speaker 1: the FDR, this is unprecedented. We've never seen anything like 154 00:07:47,200 --> 00:07:49,280 Speaker 1: this in the history of this country. I want to 155 00:07:49,360 --> 00:07:52,480 Speaker 1: count of how many times CNN said unprecedented. You can 156 00:07:52,520 --> 00:07:54,360 Speaker 1: say it once and I think we always did. Okay, 157 00:07:54,600 --> 00:07:57,480 Speaker 1: and that's fine, that's enough. But the point that again 158 00:07:57,560 --> 00:08:00,680 Speaker 1: he's they let these little nanny state home monitors get 159 00:08:00,680 --> 00:08:02,920 Speaker 1: in their ears where they have to both justify their 160 00:08:02,960 --> 00:08:05,640 Speaker 1: coverage or not. It's like you just said, ratings. Also, 161 00:08:05,880 --> 00:08:07,320 Speaker 1: you know why, I know it was a ratings decision. 162 00:08:07,360 --> 00:08:09,720 Speaker 1: I was reading Dylan Byer's column last night that was 163 00:08:09,760 --> 00:08:13,640 Speaker 1: the biggest day of CNN's modern history since the invasion 164 00:08:13,680 --> 00:08:16,640 Speaker 1: of Ukraine was the Trump arrest. That was their biggest day. 165 00:08:16,840 --> 00:08:19,280 Speaker 1: And so yeah, it was a business. They did it 166 00:08:19,320 --> 00:08:22,320 Speaker 1: because that's what works for all of the time, and 167 00:08:22,360 --> 00:08:24,640 Speaker 1: the handwringing over oh, we're going to go back to 168 00:08:24,640 --> 00:08:26,640 Speaker 1: the center the moment Trump was back on the stage, 169 00:08:26,960 --> 00:08:31,320 Speaker 1: full blown obsession. Soon Trump to speak, shot of the cars, 170 00:08:31,640 --> 00:08:34,800 Speaker 1: shot of the plane, shot of the empty court. That one, 171 00:08:34,840 --> 00:08:37,520 Speaker 1: I don't really guess this is this is also just 172 00:08:37,679 --> 00:08:40,520 Speaker 1: intigency and sure, I mean, this is what is their 173 00:08:40,600 --> 00:08:43,160 Speaker 1: bread and butter, going over the top with these news 174 00:08:43,160 --> 00:08:46,880 Speaker 1: events and completely sensationalizing. Whether I remember the cruise ship 175 00:08:46,960 --> 00:08:49,640 Speaker 1: that they went all land to cover or the flight 176 00:08:49,679 --> 00:08:52,760 Speaker 1: what was it? The yeah that I mean, this is like, 177 00:08:52,920 --> 00:08:55,880 Speaker 1: this is what they do. So the idea that Chris licked, 178 00:08:56,000 --> 00:08:59,040 Speaker 1: we always were skeptical that Chris licked the new head 179 00:08:59,080 --> 00:09:01,400 Speaker 1: of the network was really to be like fundamentally different 180 00:09:01,480 --> 00:09:03,600 Speaker 1: or like represent any fundamental break from the way that 181 00:09:03,640 --> 00:09:07,160 Speaker 1: CNN has always been. That's clearly not the case. I 182 00:09:07,160 --> 00:09:10,480 Speaker 1: actually watched some of their coverage while we were waiting 183 00:09:10,520 --> 00:09:12,960 Speaker 1: for the charges to drop, which took way too long, 184 00:09:13,040 --> 00:09:16,440 Speaker 1: and it was like extremely painful, because God, I hate 185 00:09:16,440 --> 00:09:19,079 Speaker 1: the way on cable news, since it's twenty four hours, 186 00:09:19,520 --> 00:09:23,120 Speaker 1: they feel the need to fill the airspace even though 187 00:09:23,160 --> 00:09:25,880 Speaker 1: there's literally nothing happening and nothing to say. So while 188 00:09:25,920 --> 00:09:29,040 Speaker 1: they're waiting with Trump going through this arraignment, which took 189 00:09:29,080 --> 00:09:32,600 Speaker 1: longer than they expected. I mean, they didn't have the charges, 190 00:09:32,760 --> 00:09:34,600 Speaker 1: they didn't know what happened in the courtroom, and so 191 00:09:34,679 --> 00:09:37,880 Speaker 1: they just have to spend an hour saying absolutely nothing, 192 00:09:37,960 --> 00:09:40,400 Speaker 1: and it's so incredibly painful. So the way they try 193 00:09:40,440 --> 00:09:42,400 Speaker 1: to fill that is with like their ridiculous you know, 194 00:09:42,480 --> 00:09:46,559 Speaker 1: speeding boat camera on the helicopter or whatever thing. Once 195 00:09:46,600 --> 00:09:50,680 Speaker 1: they did get the charges, surprisingly to a lot of folks, 196 00:09:50,840 --> 00:09:53,800 Speaker 1: some of their legal analysts were not all that impressed 197 00:09:54,240 --> 00:09:58,640 Speaker 1: with the case that Alvin Bragg laid out and felt 198 00:09:58,640 --> 00:10:02,280 Speaker 1: that it was somewhat disappointing. They kind of let their 199 00:10:02,400 --> 00:10:03,880 Speaker 1: they kind of show their hand a little bit that 200 00:10:03,920 --> 00:10:06,760 Speaker 1: they were hoping for more, and there had been some 201 00:10:07,040 --> 00:10:09,480 Speaker 1: reporting that, oh, perhaps this will be more than just 202 00:10:09,520 --> 00:10:13,000 Speaker 1: Stormy Daniels. Perhaps there's things Alvin Bragg found out that 203 00:10:13,040 --> 00:10:15,400 Speaker 1: we didn't even have any idea about that wasn't in 204 00:10:15,440 --> 00:10:18,760 Speaker 1: the public record whatsoever. Of course we know now that 205 00:10:18,840 --> 00:10:21,520 Speaker 1: turned out to not be the case. The indictment was 206 00:10:21,679 --> 00:10:25,240 Speaker 1: exactly what we expected. It was all pretty much things 207 00:10:25,280 --> 00:10:28,320 Speaker 1: that were already in the public record. And so here 208 00:10:28,360 --> 00:10:32,560 Speaker 1: is one CNN legal analyst admitting her disappointment. Your reaction 209 00:10:32,640 --> 00:10:35,880 Speaker 1: now that you've had a chance to go through it, 210 00:10:35,920 --> 00:10:37,560 Speaker 1: is it what you thought it was going to be? 211 00:10:37,920 --> 00:10:41,880 Speaker 1: And are you unimpressed? It is what I thought it 212 00:10:41,920 --> 00:10:46,839 Speaker 1: was going to be in terms of focusing on the 213 00:10:46,840 --> 00:10:50,200 Speaker 1: payments that were made, the falsification of the records and 214 00:10:50,320 --> 00:10:54,479 Speaker 1: really tied to the payment that was made to Stormy Daniels. 215 00:10:55,120 --> 00:10:58,560 Speaker 1: In terms of a case that's being brought against a 216 00:10:58,600 --> 00:11:02,599 Speaker 1: former president, it's a little underwhelming. It's a little underwhelming. 217 00:11:02,600 --> 00:11:04,800 Speaker 1: It's just funny because, as you said, after they built 218 00:11:04,840 --> 00:11:07,360 Speaker 1: it up and after they you know, you know, after 219 00:11:07,360 --> 00:11:10,200 Speaker 1: they're sitting there salivating waiting for it, when they actually 220 00:11:10,200 --> 00:11:12,400 Speaker 1: got the indictment, they were like, yeah, I'm not so 221 00:11:12,520 --> 00:11:14,400 Speaker 1: sure about this one. I don't know if this one 222 00:11:14,720 --> 00:11:16,640 Speaker 1: is going to stand, which is you know, if you 223 00:11:16,760 --> 00:11:18,840 Speaker 1: just even listen to the leaks, you could have said 224 00:11:18,840 --> 00:11:21,640 Speaker 1: that from the very beginning. I found it amusing also 225 00:11:21,720 --> 00:11:24,840 Speaker 1: because even the mainstream media now who has been waiting 226 00:11:24,840 --> 00:11:27,720 Speaker 1: for this and salivating over it for so long. With 227 00:11:27,720 --> 00:11:29,880 Speaker 1: this up there on the screen, I mean, even the 228 00:11:29,920 --> 00:11:33,160 Speaker 1: New York Times has to publish op ed saying like, yeah, 229 00:11:33,200 --> 00:11:36,679 Speaker 1: this Trump indictment is a legal embarrassment. I haven't seen 230 00:11:36,760 --> 00:11:40,000 Speaker 1: a vociferous defense of Alvin Bragg on the actual face 231 00:11:40,040 --> 00:11:43,640 Speaker 1: of the charges yet from any mainstream media outlet, even 232 00:11:43,720 --> 00:11:47,280 Speaker 1: like liberal Apparatricks, people like Jonathan Chait and others are 233 00:11:47,280 --> 00:11:49,200 Speaker 1: coming out with columns being like, I don't think that 234 00:11:49,240 --> 00:11:51,200 Speaker 1: this is a good case. I think that this does 235 00:11:51,320 --> 00:11:53,520 Speaker 1: damage in the long run to the case of going 236 00:11:53,559 --> 00:11:56,520 Speaker 1: after Trump, and that this may in fact backfire on 237 00:11:56,679 --> 00:11:59,120 Speaker 1: all of them. So it is interesting also in that 238 00:11:59,240 --> 00:12:02,240 Speaker 1: light of their coverage relative to them. Once they got it, 239 00:12:02,400 --> 00:12:04,440 Speaker 1: how they then had to interpret what happened. So the 240 00:12:04,480 --> 00:12:07,720 Speaker 1: Times published i think four different op eds that offered 241 00:12:07,760 --> 00:12:10,560 Speaker 1: a race, so they had the whole gamut of opinion. 242 00:12:10,640 --> 00:12:12,600 Speaker 1: So they did have a defense of the charges. But 243 00:12:12,679 --> 00:12:15,680 Speaker 1: I think the fact that the you know, Trump and 244 00:12:15,720 --> 00:12:17,320 Speaker 1: Diamonds is the legal and the fact that they went 245 00:12:17,400 --> 00:12:19,800 Speaker 1: so hard in that direction allowed that to be published 246 00:12:19,840 --> 00:12:23,960 Speaker 1: was interesting. I do think Democrats are somewhat uncomfortable, especially 247 00:12:23,960 --> 00:12:26,600 Speaker 1: that this was these were the first charges to drop, 248 00:12:26,880 --> 00:12:30,080 Speaker 1: because they are obviously the least serious, they're the oldest, 249 00:12:30,320 --> 00:12:33,320 Speaker 1: they're the ones that you know it's there are like 250 00:12:33,600 --> 00:12:36,520 Speaker 1: novel legal theories in play, and pieces of it certainly 251 00:12:36,600 --> 00:12:39,960 Speaker 1: seem like a stretch from a legal perspective. On the politics, 252 00:12:39,960 --> 00:12:42,439 Speaker 1: I'm not sure that the analysis. I think there's a 253 00:12:42,520 --> 00:12:45,600 Speaker 1: legal analysis, and I think there's a political analysis. To me, 254 00:12:45,679 --> 00:12:48,720 Speaker 1: the political analysis in terms of Republican primary very clear, 255 00:12:48,880 --> 00:12:51,400 Speaker 1: and then in terms of the general electorate. As I've 256 00:12:51,400 --> 00:12:54,240 Speaker 1: said before, I'm not sure that the public is really 257 00:12:54,280 --> 00:12:57,480 Speaker 1: all that interested in the specific details of whether it's 258 00:12:57,520 --> 00:12:59,360 Speaker 1: this case or a January sixth case, or a fake 259 00:12:59,400 --> 00:13:01,920 Speaker 1: elector case or a document case or whatever. If they 260 00:13:02,000 --> 00:13:04,080 Speaker 1: like Trump, then they would be opposed to it, and 261 00:13:04,120 --> 00:13:06,240 Speaker 1: if they don't like Trump, then they're like, okay, whatever. 262 00:13:06,320 --> 00:13:07,920 Speaker 1: I'm not going to like wring my hands about which 263 00:13:07,960 --> 00:13:10,280 Speaker 1: particular indictment drops first, or how I feel about the 264 00:13:10,320 --> 00:13:13,840 Speaker 1: legal analysis of it. I do think again, on the 265 00:13:13,880 --> 00:13:18,480 Speaker 1: politics of it, Democrats, elite democrats, and I have to 266 00:13:18,520 --> 00:13:21,640 Speaker 1: say I think also the Democratic base have decided that 267 00:13:21,679 --> 00:13:26,120 Speaker 1: it politically benefits them for Trump to be the nominee. Maybe, 268 00:13:26,240 --> 00:13:29,640 Speaker 1: but we have been to this movie before, and last 269 00:13:29,640 --> 00:13:31,360 Speaker 1: time they were hoping for Trump to be the nominee 270 00:13:31,400 --> 00:13:34,400 Speaker 1: back in twenty sixteen, it didn't work out so well 271 00:13:34,440 --> 00:13:37,360 Speaker 1: for them. So I do think that there is a 272 00:13:37,400 --> 00:13:44,200 Speaker 1: lot of arrogance around excitement that Okay, he's locking down, 273 00:13:44,320 --> 00:13:47,080 Speaker 1: looks like the Republican nomination. He's in a much stronger position, 274 00:13:47,120 --> 00:13:49,200 Speaker 1: He's much more likely to be the Republican nominee. They 275 00:13:49,200 --> 00:13:51,000 Speaker 1: feel a lot more nervous having to go up against 276 00:13:51,120 --> 00:13:53,600 Speaker 1: Ron De Santis or even Nikki Haley. I don't know why, 277 00:13:54,880 --> 00:13:58,079 Speaker 1: and I just think that that level of hubris about 278 00:13:58,080 --> 00:14:01,200 Speaker 1: their ability to take out Trump and how damaging these 279 00:14:01,240 --> 00:14:04,319 Speaker 1: things will be to Trump, I think it should be tempered. 280 00:14:04,360 --> 00:14:07,240 Speaker 1: That's all im. I'll say, right, I think that's well said, 281 00:14:07,280 --> 00:14:09,440 Speaker 1: And I think the reason we had to just show 282 00:14:09,440 --> 00:14:11,760 Speaker 1: this is that I know there's a lot of interesting 283 00:14:11,880 --> 00:14:14,520 Speaker 1: media analysis right now about the way that they cover it. 284 00:14:14,640 --> 00:14:16,679 Speaker 1: Abou are they doing the wrong thing? But as you say, 285 00:14:16,760 --> 00:14:18,640 Speaker 1: at the end of the day, the elite democratic position 286 00:14:18,720 --> 00:14:20,400 Speaker 1: is we want Trump, we want them to come back, 287 00:14:20,640 --> 00:14:23,960 Speaker 1: and the media also finding himself in this very twisted position. 288 00:14:24,000 --> 00:14:25,320 Speaker 1: They're like how do we do this, How do we 289 00:14:25,320 --> 00:14:28,240 Speaker 1: cover responsibly? I think the responsible thing to do is 290 00:14:28,320 --> 00:14:31,000 Speaker 1: let people make up the minds for themselves to what 291 00:14:31,040 --> 00:14:33,280 Speaker 1: we try and do here is show you the fullsome 292 00:14:33,440 --> 00:14:35,600 Speaker 1: nature of where things are and be like, listen, I'll 293 00:14:35,600 --> 00:14:37,240 Speaker 1: tell you what I think, but you don't have to agree. 294 00:14:37,240 --> 00:14:39,480 Speaker 1: And that's completely finer with you. You can make up 295 00:14:39,520 --> 00:14:42,760 Speaker 1: your own damn mind, because that's how it actually should be. 296 00:14:42,760 --> 00:14:44,960 Speaker 1: They shouldn't be telling you what to think. And yet 297 00:14:45,080 --> 00:14:48,400 Speaker 1: you know, apparently that's what the underlying assumption behind the 298 00:14:48,400 --> 00:14:51,720 Speaker 1: Mattout coverage and all that, which is bolstered also by 299 00:14:51,760 --> 00:14:53,840 Speaker 1: the business decisions that they have to make. Yeah, I 300 00:14:53,840 --> 00:14:58,080 Speaker 1: think that's all all said. All right, let's get to 301 00:14:58,120 --> 00:15:00,200 Speaker 1: international affairs. There's a lot of stuff going on on 302 00:15:00,560 --> 00:15:03,160 Speaker 1: SOW that was covered up by the Trump indictment. The 303 00:15:03,160 --> 00:15:06,040 Speaker 1: first and foremost is a massive story about the petro 304 00:15:06,160 --> 00:15:09,720 Speaker 1: dollar and about the way that other nations outside of 305 00:15:09,760 --> 00:15:13,600 Speaker 1: the West are handling relations with China, with Russia, with 306 00:15:13,720 --> 00:15:16,320 Speaker 1: Visa Viva, the United States and Ukraine. There was a 307 00:15:16,480 --> 00:15:20,400 Speaker 1: very interesting and noticed clip from Fox News where Senator 308 00:15:20,440 --> 00:15:24,840 Speaker 1: Marco Rubio actually went on Fox to decry Brazil ditching 309 00:15:24,880 --> 00:15:28,760 Speaker 1: the petro dollar for future oil transactions with China and 310 00:15:28,800 --> 00:15:32,200 Speaker 1: talking about the declining efficacy of US sanctions. Let's take 311 00:15:32,200 --> 00:15:35,480 Speaker 1: a listen to that. Today, Brazil, in our hemisphere, largest 312 00:15:35,480 --> 00:15:37,600 Speaker 1: country in the western hemisphere south of US, cut a 313 00:15:37,680 --> 00:15:39,160 Speaker 1: trade deal with China. They're going to from now on 314 00:15:39,240 --> 00:15:41,520 Speaker 1: do trade in their own currencies, get right around the dollar. 315 00:15:41,760 --> 00:15:45,280 Speaker 1: They're creating a secondary economy in the world totally independent 316 00:15:45,280 --> 00:15:46,920 Speaker 1: of the United States. We won't have to talk about 317 00:15:46,960 --> 00:15:48,840 Speaker 1: sanctions in five years because there will be so many 318 00:15:48,880 --> 00:15:51,400 Speaker 1: countries transacting and currencies other than the dollar that we 319 00:15:51,400 --> 00:15:53,600 Speaker 1: won't have the ability to sanction them. As we are 320 00:15:53,640 --> 00:15:55,920 Speaker 1: sitting here focused on some of these nuttiness that's going up. 321 00:15:55,920 --> 00:15:58,080 Speaker 1: People that are basically dedicating their lives in this country 322 00:15:58,160 --> 00:16:00,640 Speaker 1: to ensuring that it is legal to mutilate children to 323 00:16:00,640 --> 00:16:03,160 Speaker 1: do drag shows in schools. They dedicate their lives to this. 324 00:16:03,240 --> 00:16:06,560 Speaker 1: And we have another superpower that basically wants to become 325 00:16:06,560 --> 00:16:09,000 Speaker 1: the world's dominant power at our expense, and these people 326 00:16:09,000 --> 00:16:11,400 Speaker 1: don't want to focus on it. So very interesting, at 327 00:16:11,480 --> 00:16:15,320 Speaker 1: least the front part of acrisis to get there. Yeah, 328 00:16:15,360 --> 00:16:16,840 Speaker 1: I know, it's kind of funny to see the two 329 00:16:16,880 --> 00:16:19,240 Speaker 1: pair together. But look, he's actually not wrong. Let's go 330 00:16:19,320 --> 00:16:21,080 Speaker 1: and put this up there on the screen. China and 331 00:16:21,120 --> 00:16:23,960 Speaker 1: Russia are currently looking to challenge the petro dollars. A 332 00:16:24,080 --> 00:16:26,720 Speaker 1: very interesting write up over from Oil Price. What they 333 00:16:26,720 --> 00:16:29,960 Speaker 1: point to right now is that currently the yuan accounts 334 00:16:30,000 --> 00:16:33,560 Speaker 1: for just two point seven percent of the global oil market. However, 335 00:16:33,720 --> 00:16:36,120 Speaker 1: a lot of the more recent deals in recent weeks 336 00:16:36,280 --> 00:16:38,440 Speaker 1: are signaling that the Chinese and the Russians are moving 337 00:16:38,440 --> 00:16:41,440 Speaker 1: to try and sideline the dollar, not only from Brazil, 338 00:16:41,560 --> 00:16:44,360 Speaker 1: as he said, this is the largest nation in all 339 00:16:44,400 --> 00:16:48,840 Speaker 1: of South America, but actually during that visit to riod Chi, 340 00:16:48,840 --> 00:16:52,120 Speaker 1: Shinping in December said that the China and the Arab 341 00:16:52,160 --> 00:16:54,960 Speaker 1: Gulf states are going to be trying to use Shanghai 342 00:16:55,000 --> 00:16:58,880 Speaker 1: petroleum and natural gas exchange platforms to carry out Yon's 343 00:16:58,880 --> 00:17:02,560 Speaker 1: settlement on oil and gas trades. So a separate infrastructure 344 00:17:02,600 --> 00:17:05,280 Speaker 1: is propping up through which the petro to replace the 345 00:17:05,320 --> 00:17:09,800 Speaker 1: petro dollars, specifically to try and circumvent US sanctions. Right now, 346 00:17:10,000 --> 00:17:13,320 Speaker 1: fifty eight percent of global currency reserves are the US dollar. 347 00:17:13,480 --> 00:17:15,679 Speaker 1: From twenty twenty two, only two point seven percent of that, 348 00:17:16,200 --> 00:17:19,359 Speaker 1: like I said, remains in the Chinese one. But I 349 00:17:19,359 --> 00:17:21,880 Speaker 1: mean even a ten percent increase in that is a 350 00:17:21,920 --> 00:17:25,240 Speaker 1: massive sea change to the global reserve currency. But drop 351 00:17:25,280 --> 00:17:28,560 Speaker 1: even the global reserve currency and all of that rhetoric, 352 00:17:28,680 --> 00:17:31,040 Speaker 1: Why does it matter, Because let's put this up there, 353 00:17:31,080 --> 00:17:33,000 Speaker 1: and this is straight from Chinese media from the South 354 00:17:33,280 --> 00:17:36,040 Speaker 1: China Morning Post. I thought it was important to actually 355 00:17:36,040 --> 00:17:39,280 Speaker 1: pull the perspective that they are trying to push out there, 356 00:17:39,440 --> 00:17:43,320 Speaker 1: which is that the Brazilian inroads and d dollarization is 357 00:17:43,400 --> 00:17:47,960 Speaker 1: quote reflecting cracks in US currency settlements. Here's really what happened, 358 00:17:47,960 --> 00:17:49,560 Speaker 1: and this is why it was a huge critic also 359 00:17:49,840 --> 00:17:52,800 Speaker 1: of what was going on in the initial days of sanctioning. 360 00:17:53,040 --> 00:17:57,960 Speaker 1: We basically blew up the global financial trade system for 361 00:17:58,119 --> 00:18:02,280 Speaker 1: a country Russia and or another country Ukraine, which at 362 00:18:02,280 --> 00:18:04,800 Speaker 1: the end of the day, the material fate of those 363 00:18:04,880 --> 00:18:08,520 Speaker 1: two countries, especially Ukraine, has a zero impact on the 364 00:18:08,640 --> 00:18:11,280 Speaker 1: US economy, on the US wave life. I know there's 365 00:18:11,320 --> 00:18:13,520 Speaker 1: going to have a lot of Ukrainian NEAPO stands in 366 00:18:13,560 --> 00:18:16,480 Speaker 1: the comments, but here's the deal. Whoever controls Kiev, that 367 00:18:16,560 --> 00:18:19,960 Speaker 1: doesn't affect anybody's life in Nebraska. However, there are a 368 00:18:20,000 --> 00:18:22,960 Speaker 1: lot of other countries and potential conflicts where that is 369 00:18:23,000 --> 00:18:25,240 Speaker 1: not the case. And so one of the things that 370 00:18:25,280 --> 00:18:27,440 Speaker 1: I was trying to say then is you only get 371 00:18:27,440 --> 00:18:29,520 Speaker 1: one shot at this, at showing your hand. You know, 372 00:18:29,560 --> 00:18:33,280 Speaker 1: whenever you're the empire and you like pull the ripcord 373 00:18:33,359 --> 00:18:36,560 Speaker 1: on your real like most financial power that you have, 374 00:18:37,000 --> 00:18:39,840 Speaker 1: you better do it on something that really matters. Decided 375 00:18:39,840 --> 00:18:44,000 Speaker 1: to do that on Ukraine. Well, the Chinese, the second 376 00:18:44,040 --> 00:18:46,800 Speaker 1: largest economy on earth, far more powerful ever than the 377 00:18:46,880 --> 00:18:49,879 Speaker 1: USSR they saw all that in Beijing and they're like, Okay, 378 00:18:49,960 --> 00:18:51,960 Speaker 1: that's just never going to ever happen to us, and 379 00:18:52,160 --> 00:18:54,480 Speaker 1: they're not fools. So what do they do? Immediately they 380 00:18:54,520 --> 00:18:58,960 Speaker 1: started doing wan deals with Russia that go to India 381 00:18:59,080 --> 00:19:02,080 Speaker 1: as well. India, then one of the largest nations outside 382 00:19:02,119 --> 00:19:05,000 Speaker 1: of China, says, well, we still want cheap oil, and 383 00:19:05,040 --> 00:19:07,760 Speaker 1: so they decide to start pricing things in different currency 384 00:19:07,800 --> 00:19:10,600 Speaker 1: when buying from the Russians. The Brazilians, who are not 385 00:19:10,680 --> 00:19:13,200 Speaker 1: on board with US at all. And how many times 386 00:19:13,280 --> 00:19:16,320 Speaker 1: Crystal have we pointed to global public opinion that says 387 00:19:16,560 --> 00:19:18,919 Speaker 1: that the rest of the world does not agree with 388 00:19:19,000 --> 00:19:21,439 Speaker 1: US on Ukraine. They don't agree with Russia either, but 389 00:19:21,480 --> 00:19:24,520 Speaker 1: they definitely don't agree with the NATO centric view of 390 00:19:24,600 --> 00:19:27,719 Speaker 1: the conflict that this is some existential threat to their interests. 391 00:19:27,880 --> 00:19:29,920 Speaker 1: They don't really care either way. They're like, yeah, I'm 392 00:19:29,920 --> 00:19:32,359 Speaker 1: not saying it's good, but you know, like cheap oil 393 00:19:32,600 --> 00:19:34,680 Speaker 1: is nice because that's what we have to at the 394 00:19:34,760 --> 00:19:36,159 Speaker 1: end of the the day. We've got to care for our 395 00:19:36,240 --> 00:19:39,199 Speaker 1: own citizens. So looking at this and just seeing the 396 00:19:39,320 --> 00:19:43,800 Speaker 1: colossal economic blunder that we have made, we essentially sacrifice really, 397 00:19:43,840 --> 00:19:46,200 Speaker 1: I think the only chance we ever had at being 398 00:19:46,240 --> 00:19:48,680 Speaker 1: able to like financially push back on China if we 399 00:19:48,760 --> 00:19:53,240 Speaker 1: ever wanted to in exchange for the fate of Eastern 400 00:19:53,320 --> 00:19:55,679 Speaker 1: Dunboss in Ukraine, which I think is nuts. I mean, 401 00:19:55,720 --> 00:19:58,320 Speaker 1: there's no balance sheet where any of this makes sense. 402 00:19:58,480 --> 00:20:01,439 Speaker 1: We really warned about this, yes on that there's a 403 00:20:01,560 --> 00:20:04,440 Speaker 1: cost to it's not just a cost to our Russian 404 00:20:04,440 --> 00:20:07,879 Speaker 1: society for the economic warfare that we were waging, but 405 00:20:07,880 --> 00:20:11,280 Speaker 1: that there were real risks entailed here. But I think 406 00:20:11,280 --> 00:20:13,280 Speaker 1: you have to go back even before that. I mean, 407 00:20:13,280 --> 00:20:15,240 Speaker 1: we have tried to throw our weight around with sanctions 408 00:20:15,240 --> 00:20:18,119 Speaker 1: far too many times, and even including with regard to 409 00:20:18,200 --> 00:20:22,800 Speaker 1: Russia before this particular war and illegal invasion, because they 410 00:20:22,880 --> 00:20:27,320 Speaker 1: had years after our initial round of sanctions to build 411 00:20:27,480 --> 00:20:31,679 Speaker 1: up barriers to insulate themselves right past twenty thirteen, to 412 00:20:31,720 --> 00:20:34,960 Speaker 1: insulate themselves from the economic warfare that we wait. So 413 00:20:35,119 --> 00:20:37,560 Speaker 1: I'm not going to say that it has had no impact. 414 00:20:37,800 --> 00:20:41,320 Speaker 1: It certainly hasn't had the impact that we thought here 415 00:20:41,359 --> 00:20:43,639 Speaker 1: in the West that it was going to have. And 416 00:20:43,720 --> 00:20:47,840 Speaker 1: this is reminder, with a more or less unified West 417 00:20:47,960 --> 00:20:51,840 Speaker 1: with regard to China, the views are far less unified 418 00:20:51,960 --> 00:20:55,639 Speaker 1: among our European allies and US. So we sort of 419 00:20:55,680 --> 00:20:59,520 Speaker 1: showed our hand here and showed some weakness because China's 420 00:20:59,560 --> 00:21:01,320 Speaker 1: looking at the and go, hey, if Russia can be 421 00:21:01,359 --> 00:21:04,280 Speaker 1: basically okay, we can build up some other relationships here 422 00:21:04,320 --> 00:21:06,960 Speaker 1: that we already have been working on, and then we're 423 00:21:06,960 --> 00:21:09,399 Speaker 1: not so worried about these sanctions either. Now, on the 424 00:21:09,480 --> 00:21:11,719 Speaker 1: other hand, of course, it is a much deeper trading 425 00:21:11,760 --> 00:21:15,479 Speaker 1: relationship with the Chinese, which both entails a lot more 426 00:21:15,560 --> 00:21:17,760 Speaker 1: risk for us and also a lot more risk for them. 427 00:21:18,119 --> 00:21:21,879 Speaker 1: But we gave them the roadmap, We blew our whole wad, 428 00:21:21,960 --> 00:21:24,960 Speaker 1: so to speak, and allowed them to see exactly how 429 00:21:25,000 --> 00:21:27,479 Speaker 1: far we could go, and then they can use that 430 00:21:27,560 --> 00:21:30,320 Speaker 1: as their own roadmap. To make sure they can insulate 431 00:21:30,440 --> 00:21:35,000 Speaker 1: themselves from any future economic warfare to come. So listen, 432 00:21:35,040 --> 00:21:37,320 Speaker 1: I mean, in a sense, number one, can't blame them. 433 00:21:37,400 --> 00:21:39,119 Speaker 1: Number two, we really kind of asked for it, and 434 00:21:39,160 --> 00:21:42,639 Speaker 1: we from the beginning have been warning about the potential 435 00:21:42,760 --> 00:21:46,320 Speaker 1: domestic consequences here and consequences for our standing in the 436 00:21:46,359 --> 00:21:50,080 Speaker 1: world of using these of weaponizing these sanctions over and 437 00:21:50,119 --> 00:21:52,760 Speaker 1: over again. Yeah, and I just can't get over how 438 00:21:53,320 --> 00:21:56,600 Speaker 1: big of fools that we look like on the global stage. 439 00:21:56,720 --> 00:21:59,479 Speaker 1: Zoom out of NATO, where apparently we're like the greatest 440 00:21:59,480 --> 00:22:02,480 Speaker 1: heroes in private. They're happy to take your money and 441 00:22:02,520 --> 00:22:04,080 Speaker 1: then stab you in the back whenever they want to. 442 00:22:04,119 --> 00:22:06,560 Speaker 1: We'll get to that. But look at Saudi Arabia, a 443 00:22:06,600 --> 00:22:09,200 Speaker 1: country that we spend one hundred billion dollars a year 444 00:22:09,359 --> 00:22:12,240 Speaker 1: in sending weapons to, We underwrite their security. This family 445 00:22:12,280 --> 00:22:14,600 Speaker 1: would never be in charge if it wasn't for a 446 00:22:14,760 --> 00:22:18,280 Speaker 1: US global underwriting. They're willing to literally take your money 447 00:22:18,560 --> 00:22:20,440 Speaker 1: and then look at you and put the middle finger 448 00:22:20,520 --> 00:22:21,920 Speaker 1: right in your face. Put this up there on the 449 00:22:21,920 --> 00:22:25,200 Speaker 1: screen right now. The decision to go ahead and cut 450 00:22:25,240 --> 00:22:28,560 Speaker 1: oil to raise oil prices was very simple. This is 451 00:22:28,640 --> 00:22:30,800 Speaker 1: David Ignatius. By the way, who's writing this. The United 452 00:22:30,840 --> 00:22:33,479 Speaker 1: States doesn't call the shots in the Persian Gulf or 453 00:22:33,520 --> 00:22:36,920 Speaker 1: the oil market anymore. For better or worse, the era 454 00:22:37,080 --> 00:22:40,680 Speaker 1: of American hegemony in the Middle East is over. Crown 455 00:22:40,720 --> 00:22:44,560 Speaker 1: Prince Muhammed Ben Salman pressed oil OPEC producers. This is 456 00:22:44,600 --> 00:22:49,640 Speaker 1: the key. MBS specifically went to OPEK and said, we 457 00:22:49,760 --> 00:22:53,040 Speaker 1: want to cut to buy one million barrels per day 458 00:22:53,359 --> 00:22:56,080 Speaker 1: to boost the price of crude from eighty five to 459 00:22:56,160 --> 00:22:59,200 Speaker 1: eighty five dollars a barrel up by six percent? Why 460 00:22:59,359 --> 00:23:02,159 Speaker 1: to make more money and to make it more difficult 461 00:23:02,280 --> 00:23:04,919 Speaker 1: for the US economy and for the West during the 462 00:23:04,960 --> 00:23:08,359 Speaker 1: ongoing crisis in Ukraine. Now, a real ally would do 463 00:23:08,400 --> 00:23:10,560 Speaker 1: what a They would either do what you would tell 464 00:23:10,600 --> 00:23:13,439 Speaker 1: them to do if it's a client state, or b 465 00:23:13,960 --> 00:23:16,760 Speaker 1: somebody who you know, wants friendly relations and thinks that 466 00:23:16,760 --> 00:23:18,879 Speaker 1: this is like a give and take relationship would say, 467 00:23:18,880 --> 00:23:20,639 Speaker 1: all right, we'll hear you out and we'll take the 468 00:23:20,680 --> 00:23:22,520 Speaker 1: temporary hit. You know, it's not like we aren't one 469 00:23:22,560 --> 00:23:25,280 Speaker 1: hundred billionaires several times over, and we'll make sure that 470 00:23:25,359 --> 00:23:28,560 Speaker 1: oil is cheaper. They don't care. They literally don't. They 471 00:23:28,600 --> 00:23:31,880 Speaker 1: disregard what Washington has said they have stabbed us now 472 00:23:32,000 --> 00:23:34,880 Speaker 1: in the eye four or five times whenever it comes 473 00:23:34,880 --> 00:23:39,240 Speaker 1: to OPEC production, and the only fools are us in Congress. 474 00:23:39,240 --> 00:23:42,760 Speaker 1: They're still selling them weapons. The Biden administration goes over 475 00:23:42,800 --> 00:23:46,000 Speaker 1: there and bows down before MBS like a joke, you know, 476 00:23:46,040 --> 00:23:48,679 Speaker 1: in front of the entire world. They're laughing because they 477 00:23:48,760 --> 00:23:51,560 Speaker 1: got the President of the United States to come over there. Whatever. 478 00:23:51,640 --> 00:23:53,080 Speaker 1: You know, he didn't shake his hand, He just gave 479 00:23:53,160 --> 00:23:55,320 Speaker 1: him a fist buck. Why he really showed it to 480 00:23:55,400 --> 00:23:58,320 Speaker 1: him there, mister president. And then the moment you leave, 481 00:23:58,600 --> 00:24:01,639 Speaker 1: they have China over. They strike this deal with Iran 482 00:24:01,680 --> 00:24:04,119 Speaker 1: and allow Beijing to be the broker. And if you 483 00:24:04,119 --> 00:24:06,600 Speaker 1: think Beijing doesn't have its hand behind this decision either, 484 00:24:06,640 --> 00:24:08,560 Speaker 1: and then you're a fool. I mean, it's like in 485 00:24:08,760 --> 00:24:13,560 Speaker 1: every single theater all across the world in Asia, in 486 00:24:13,640 --> 00:24:16,359 Speaker 1: South Korea and Japan, they're doubting whether we're actually gonna 487 00:24:16,359 --> 00:24:19,359 Speaker 1: be doing it. You know, the Taiwanese president is transiting 488 00:24:19,400 --> 00:24:21,720 Speaker 1: through America. I always love how we do these fake 489 00:24:21,800 --> 00:24:23,879 Speaker 1: diplomatic things. She was in California and she met with 490 00:24:25,119 --> 00:24:28,159 Speaker 1: House Speaker Kevin McCarthy. Same thing, you know, the Taiwanese. 491 00:24:28,160 --> 00:24:30,000 Speaker 1: We're actually been shorting them on arms so that we 492 00:24:30,000 --> 00:24:32,520 Speaker 1: could send them to Ukraine. I've been looking also and 493 00:24:32,600 --> 00:24:36,239 Speaker 1: tracking people who are inside DoD are warning about the 494 00:24:36,400 --> 00:24:40,080 Speaker 1: level of shortages that we have. We are incurring massive 495 00:24:41,000 --> 00:24:44,360 Speaker 1: hurts across the world and here at home on behalf 496 00:24:44,400 --> 00:24:46,720 Speaker 1: of this Ukrainian conflict. And I don't know how you 497 00:24:46,720 --> 00:24:49,080 Speaker 1: can possibly look, you know, at this from a thirty 498 00:24:49,080 --> 00:24:51,600 Speaker 1: thousand foot level and say that any of this is 499 00:24:51,640 --> 00:24:53,879 Speaker 1: worth a visa vi to what we're actually doing. The 500 00:24:53,960 --> 00:24:56,119 Speaker 1: Russian invasion and we're going to get to this in 501 00:24:56,200 --> 00:24:57,640 Speaker 1: just a moment. In a lot of ways, has been 502 00:24:57,760 --> 00:25:00,960 Speaker 1: just a total disaster for Russia. Of course, it really 503 00:25:01,040 --> 00:25:05,880 Speaker 1: sort of forced into reality a multipolar world, and maybe 504 00:25:05,880 --> 00:25:09,600 Speaker 1: it revealed what already existed because the relationships that China 505 00:25:09,640 --> 00:25:11,640 Speaker 1: has been building around the world. I mean, this goes 506 00:25:11,720 --> 00:25:15,520 Speaker 1: back years at this point. I was listening this morning 507 00:25:15,560 --> 00:25:18,440 Speaker 1: to a podcast about their you know, more specifics about 508 00:25:18,440 --> 00:25:21,399 Speaker 1: their efforts in Africa, where it's a double edged sword. 509 00:25:21,560 --> 00:25:24,240 Speaker 1: You know, they load up these countries with a lot 510 00:25:24,240 --> 00:25:27,400 Speaker 1: of debt, but there are very visible signs of Chinese influence. 511 00:25:27,520 --> 00:25:29,920 Speaker 1: A road, a dam, a bridge, an airport, sometimes with 512 00:25:30,000 --> 00:25:33,639 Speaker 1: the Chinese flag flying outside that In some places, people 513 00:25:33,680 --> 00:25:36,639 Speaker 1: are very grateful for this level of development, whereas the 514 00:25:36,800 --> 00:25:39,960 Speaker 1: US has basically treated Africa as like another front of 515 00:25:39,960 --> 00:25:42,800 Speaker 1: their war on terror. So again it's a double edged 516 00:25:42,800 --> 00:25:44,280 Speaker 1: sword because then at the end of the day, you've 517 00:25:44,280 --> 00:25:46,840 Speaker 1: got a nation that's loaded up with debt. But you 518 00:25:46,880 --> 00:25:50,040 Speaker 1: can see in the seeds that the Chinese government has 519 00:25:50,040 --> 00:25:53,399 Speaker 1: been planting for years and years. You know, when the 520 00:25:53,560 --> 00:25:55,600 Speaker 1: US goes to the world and says, hey, we need 521 00:25:55,640 --> 00:25:57,680 Speaker 1: you on our side in terms of the Ukraine War, 522 00:25:58,119 --> 00:26:00,359 Speaker 1: most of the world's like, I think we're going to 523 00:26:00,359 --> 00:26:03,399 Speaker 1: stay on this one. Actually know, whether it's the African nations, 524 00:26:03,440 --> 00:26:07,199 Speaker 1: whether it's nations in South America, whether it's India, They're like, 525 00:26:07,400 --> 00:26:09,160 Speaker 1: you know, we're going to let you work this one 526 00:26:09,160 --> 00:26:10,520 Speaker 1: out and we're going to kind of stay on the 527 00:26:10,560 --> 00:26:12,960 Speaker 1: sidelines and see how it all unfold. Yeah there. I mean, look, 528 00:26:13,040 --> 00:26:15,240 Speaker 1: New Delhi is happy to take cheap gas as long 529 00:26:15,280 --> 00:26:17,720 Speaker 1: as they can get it. Brazil will do the same thing, 530 00:26:17,920 --> 00:26:21,439 Speaker 1: and so will a lot of developing countries. Even the 531 00:26:21,480 --> 00:26:24,800 Speaker 1: South Koreans are out there selling arms to anybody who's 532 00:26:24,800 --> 00:26:27,120 Speaker 1: got money, because they're like Oh, American arms are going 533 00:26:27,119 --> 00:26:29,280 Speaker 1: to Ukraine. We'll take those dollars and we'll make sure 534 00:26:29,320 --> 00:26:32,199 Speaker 1: that we can stand it up. I was looking at 535 00:26:32,240 --> 00:26:33,880 Speaker 1: it from a macro view, and I was just thinking 536 00:26:33,920 --> 00:26:37,280 Speaker 1: about it this way. Only the US is the nation 537 00:26:37,760 --> 00:26:40,760 Speaker 1: which is not allowed by its elite and its presidents 538 00:26:40,920 --> 00:26:44,080 Speaker 1: to act in its own material interests. All other countries 539 00:26:44,119 --> 00:26:49,000 Speaker 1: on Earth make cold blooded, real politic calculations worth it, 540 00:26:49,320 --> 00:26:51,800 Speaker 1: not worth it, good for my people, not good for 541 00:26:51,880 --> 00:26:55,480 Speaker 1: my people. The idea from the unipolar moment onward has been, well, 542 00:26:55,480 --> 00:26:57,639 Speaker 1: we're such a great nation that we can do both. 543 00:26:57,880 --> 00:27:01,040 Speaker 1: But listen, guys, China allowed them to rise up in 544 00:27:01,080 --> 00:27:03,160 Speaker 1: the meantime, not just China. I mean, there's all kinds 545 00:27:03,160 --> 00:27:05,560 Speaker 1: of global competition that's happening now. We are just like 546 00:27:05,600 --> 00:27:08,320 Speaker 1: any other country. It's checks and balance in terms of 547 00:27:08,359 --> 00:27:11,720 Speaker 1: our sheet, what works and what doesn't, what's good for us? 548 00:27:11,920 --> 00:27:15,479 Speaker 1: And we too, blessings have been had, all this bounty 549 00:27:15,520 --> 00:27:19,000 Speaker 1: of energy and money, and you know, all this benefits 550 00:27:19,040 --> 00:27:22,360 Speaker 1: so called of market capitalism, but a lot of that 551 00:27:22,520 --> 00:27:25,000 Speaker 1: benefit is fading away. We're at the end of the day, 552 00:27:25,000 --> 00:27:27,000 Speaker 1: we're just like everybody else. And I think we're going 553 00:27:27,040 --> 00:27:28,639 Speaker 1: to learn all that real s Liff, and I actually 554 00:27:28,680 --> 00:27:31,560 Speaker 1: think that part of the story there is this is 555 00:27:31,600 --> 00:27:35,240 Speaker 1: a nation that, whether it comes to domestic affairs or 556 00:27:35,359 --> 00:27:41,280 Speaker 1: foreign affairs or anything else, has allowed corporate power to 557 00:27:41,440 --> 00:27:45,880 Speaker 1: supersede any sort of interest of the American people or 558 00:27:46,080 --> 00:27:50,000 Speaker 1: national interest, and so we're unable to act for the 559 00:27:50,000 --> 00:27:52,639 Speaker 1: interests of the people. We're unable to act for the 560 00:27:52,640 --> 00:27:55,560 Speaker 1: interests of the nation because we're so beholden to like 561 00:27:55,880 --> 00:27:59,600 Speaker 1: whoever's making money off of whatever we're doing in the world. 562 00:27:59,640 --> 00:28:03,280 Speaker 1: So really clouds our ability to maneuver in the world. Yes, okay, 563 00:28:03,280 --> 00:28:04,760 Speaker 1: so let's go to the second bar here because it's 564 00:28:04,880 --> 00:28:07,480 Speaker 1: very important breaking news that actually just came out this morning. 565 00:28:07,520 --> 00:28:11,520 Speaker 1: President Vladimir's Zelenski telling the Financial Times that Ukraine is 566 00:28:11,640 --> 00:28:14,840 Speaker 1: ready to talk to Russia on Crimea if their counter 567 00:28:14,880 --> 00:28:16,960 Speaker 1: offensive succeeds. Let's go ahead and put it up there 568 00:28:17,240 --> 00:28:20,159 Speaker 1: on the screen. Kiev is willing to discuss the future 569 00:28:20,160 --> 00:28:23,119 Speaker 1: of Crimea with Moscow if its forces reached the border 570 00:28:23,119 --> 00:28:26,639 Speaker 1: of Russian occupied Peninsula, a top advisor to President Zelenski 571 00:28:26,680 --> 00:28:29,439 Speaker 1: has told The Financial Times these comments were made by 572 00:28:29,440 --> 00:28:32,240 Speaker 1: the deputy head of Zelensky's office and is the most 573 00:28:32,240 --> 00:28:35,600 Speaker 1: explicit statement yet of Ukraine's interest in negotiation since it 574 00:28:35,640 --> 00:28:39,000 Speaker 1: cut off peace talks with the Kremlin last April. He says, quote, 575 00:28:39,080 --> 00:28:42,360 Speaker 1: if we succeed in achieving our strategic goals on the battlefield, 576 00:28:42,440 --> 00:28:45,160 Speaker 1: when we will be able on the administrative border with Crimea, 577 00:28:45,200 --> 00:28:48,000 Speaker 1: we are ready to open a diplomatic page to discuss 578 00:28:48,200 --> 00:28:50,920 Speaker 1: this issue. It doesn't mean that we exclude the way 579 00:28:50,960 --> 00:28:54,280 Speaker 1: of liberation of Crimea by our army. So obviously that's 580 00:28:54,320 --> 00:28:58,600 Speaker 1: important because Crimea was originally seized an annexed by Russia 581 00:28:58,600 --> 00:29:01,240 Speaker 1: in two thousand and thirteen, and one of the major 582 00:29:01,520 --> 00:29:05,640 Speaker 1: worries here and throughout the West has been that escalating 583 00:29:05,680 --> 00:29:08,480 Speaker 1: this to a nuclear conflict would come if some sort 584 00:29:08,480 --> 00:29:11,560 Speaker 1: of Ukrainian offensive is specifically at a US backed weapons 585 00:29:11,640 --> 00:29:13,840 Speaker 1: or any of that we're used on Crimea, which the 586 00:29:13,880 --> 00:29:16,880 Speaker 1: Russians genuinely do consider theirs in a way that they 587 00:29:16,920 --> 00:29:22,440 Speaker 1: don't consider the newly annexed territories of eastern Ukraine. Now, 588 00:29:22,720 --> 00:29:26,880 Speaker 1: though it does not necessarily mean it's the opening that 589 00:29:26,960 --> 00:29:29,800 Speaker 1: we may initially want it to be, because implicit in 590 00:29:29,840 --> 00:29:32,120 Speaker 1: this is what that Ukraine is going to take back 591 00:29:32,240 --> 00:29:36,360 Speaker 1: every inch of territory that they have lost since the 592 00:29:36,400 --> 00:29:39,920 Speaker 1: initial Russian invasion. Now, of course, Ukrainian counter offensive have 593 00:29:40,040 --> 00:29:43,520 Speaker 1: been dramatically successful back in March of twenty twenty two, 594 00:29:44,120 --> 00:29:46,920 Speaker 1: are still waiting to see exactly how that is going 595 00:29:46,960 --> 00:29:50,040 Speaker 1: to look In twenty twenty three, the long awaited Spring 596 00:29:50,120 --> 00:29:53,680 Speaker 1: Offensive hasn't yet happened. There's been some discussion that the 597 00:29:54,000 --> 00:29:56,719 Speaker 1: Russian Spring offensive did not go the way that they 598 00:29:56,760 --> 00:29:58,120 Speaker 1: want it to be, but it's one of those where 599 00:29:58,160 --> 00:30:00,000 Speaker 1: we don't know if that was the actual Russi effe 600 00:30:00,400 --> 00:30:03,800 Speaker 1: or not. Obviously who has insight into Moscow's plans. Really 601 00:30:03,800 --> 00:30:05,960 Speaker 1: what's going on is a complete meat grinder going on 602 00:30:06,040 --> 00:30:09,160 Speaker 1: in the city of Bakmode, where both Ukrainian forces are 603 00:30:09,160 --> 00:30:12,600 Speaker 1: expending thousands of rounds of ammunition per day and the 604 00:30:12,680 --> 00:30:15,040 Speaker 1: Russians are losing on order of at least like three 605 00:30:15,040 --> 00:30:17,840 Speaker 1: to one because they are the attacking party. Very classic 606 00:30:17,880 --> 00:30:20,920 Speaker 1: in terms of like trench like siege warfare in a 607 00:30:20,960 --> 00:30:23,720 Speaker 1: World War One style conflict. The issue right now is 608 00:30:23,760 --> 00:30:27,360 Speaker 1: one of those where how long could Ukraine realistically keep 609 00:30:27,400 --> 00:30:30,480 Speaker 1: that going because the amount of shells and ammo that 610 00:30:30,480 --> 00:30:32,840 Speaker 1: we are giving them is not limitless. Same from the 611 00:30:32,840 --> 00:30:36,080 Speaker 1: west whereas the Russians have a genuine industrial base and 612 00:30:36,120 --> 00:30:38,360 Speaker 1: they have thousands and hundreds of thousands of people they 613 00:30:38,400 --> 00:30:41,120 Speaker 1: can still throw into this conflict if need be, So 614 00:30:41,440 --> 00:30:43,360 Speaker 1: the question is like who can hold out longer. It's 615 00:30:43,400 --> 00:30:46,680 Speaker 1: really a classic World War One type scenario. The issue 616 00:30:46,680 --> 00:30:51,000 Speaker 1: here too, though, is that yes, they're expressing open to negotiation, 617 00:30:51,280 --> 00:30:53,960 Speaker 1: but the secondary part of it, crystal where any discussion 618 00:30:53,960 --> 00:30:56,640 Speaker 1: with Chinese President Shishinping that hasn't happened yet, we don't 619 00:30:56,640 --> 00:30:59,200 Speaker 1: know if the Chinese shot them down after Zelenski essentially 620 00:30:59,240 --> 00:31:01,400 Speaker 1: said hey, I'll call you know, let's talk, like you 621 00:31:01,400 --> 00:31:03,760 Speaker 1: could call me, you can even visit Kiev or any 622 00:31:03,760 --> 00:31:06,120 Speaker 1: of that. So I'm not quite sure how to make 623 00:31:06,120 --> 00:31:08,000 Speaker 1: of this. I genuinely think it's always a good thing 624 00:31:08,040 --> 00:31:10,600 Speaker 1: when somebody says that they're willing to talk. But also 625 00:31:10,640 --> 00:31:13,800 Speaker 1: obviously the preconditions here are not realistic, at least in 626 00:31:13,840 --> 00:31:15,760 Speaker 1: the eyes of the Kremlin. But you know, maybe they 627 00:31:15,760 --> 00:31:17,560 Speaker 1: need to get realistic too, because it's not like they 628 00:31:17,560 --> 00:31:20,240 Speaker 1: don't have hundreds of people dying literally per day on 629 00:31:20,240 --> 00:31:22,800 Speaker 1: the battlefield. Yeah. No, I mean, it's incredibly welcome to 630 00:31:22,840 --> 00:31:25,520 Speaker 1: see those comments. There's just no two ways about it. 631 00:31:25,560 --> 00:31:27,440 Speaker 1: One of the things that we've been very fearful about 632 00:31:27,520 --> 00:31:30,160 Speaker 1: is that Crimea could represent a kind of, you know, 633 00:31:30,440 --> 00:31:35,160 Speaker 1: really true redline for Russia in the way that some 634 00:31:35,200 --> 00:31:37,560 Speaker 1: of the other territories and regions and actions from the 635 00:31:37,680 --> 00:31:40,920 Speaker 1: Ukrainians may not represent. And you know, we're not alone 636 00:31:40,920 --> 00:31:42,880 Speaker 1: in that. A lot of NATO allies are fearful of 637 00:31:42,920 --> 00:31:45,560 Speaker 1: that as well. You know, it was right after they 638 00:31:46,080 --> 00:31:49,120 Speaker 1: blew up that Crimean bridge that there started to be 639 00:31:49,200 --> 00:31:52,880 Speaker 1: real concerns about Russia could see this as an existential 640 00:31:52,920 --> 00:31:55,680 Speaker 1: threat to the point that they may actually use quote 641 00:31:55,720 --> 00:31:59,280 Speaker 1: unquote tactical nuclear weapons. That has continued to be a concern. 642 00:31:59,360 --> 00:32:02,280 Speaker 1: You've seen so rhetoric that I think has been profoundly 643 00:32:02,360 --> 00:32:06,480 Speaker 1: dangerous from leaders like Nancy Pelosi about Ukraine fully taking 644 00:32:06,520 --> 00:32:09,200 Speaker 1: back all of Crimean US being fully behind them in 645 00:32:09,280 --> 00:32:12,440 Speaker 1: terms of that operation. So it is very welcome to 646 00:32:12,520 --> 00:32:17,000 Speaker 1: see what is a really notable and significant shift in 647 00:32:17,120 --> 00:32:20,040 Speaker 1: tone here from Zelenski. And then, you know, the other 648 00:32:20,200 --> 00:32:23,760 Speaker 1: question that remains to be seen is if there was 649 00:32:23,800 --> 00:32:28,120 Speaker 1: a genuine interest from Ukrainians and engaging with peace talks, 650 00:32:28,240 --> 00:32:31,600 Speaker 1: especially if China was involved in those peace talks, would 651 00:32:31,640 --> 00:32:34,640 Speaker 1: the us be open to it, would we let it happen, 652 00:32:34,720 --> 00:32:37,200 Speaker 1: because it sure seems like we would be interested in 653 00:32:37,240 --> 00:32:40,560 Speaker 1: blocking that, even though the claim has always been from 654 00:32:40,600 --> 00:32:43,400 Speaker 1: the Biden administration that of course it's the Ukrainians who 655 00:32:43,400 --> 00:32:44,959 Speaker 1: are in the front seat, and we'll just you know, 656 00:32:45,000 --> 00:32:47,240 Speaker 1: back them up in whatever they want to do. See 657 00:32:47,240 --> 00:32:49,960 Speaker 1: if that holds, if they actually got serious about engaging 658 00:32:49,960 --> 00:32:51,920 Speaker 1: in peace talks with China. Yeah, we'll see how it 659 00:32:52,000 --> 00:32:54,520 Speaker 1: goes down. And actually this broke this morning, so we 660 00:32:54,560 --> 00:32:57,040 Speaker 1: can add some secondary parts of this also. I just 661 00:32:57,080 --> 00:33:00,920 Speaker 1: want to underscore again just how different things are outside 662 00:33:00,960 --> 00:33:05,640 Speaker 1: of Washington and outside of like Warsaw and Talin and 663 00:33:05,800 --> 00:33:09,400 Speaker 1: Kiev's view of the conflict as opposed to literally everybody else. 664 00:33:09,560 --> 00:33:11,400 Speaker 1: Go ahead and put this up there on the screen, 665 00:33:11,680 --> 00:33:14,280 Speaker 1: you know, for all of the discussion of our great 666 00:33:14,360 --> 00:33:17,320 Speaker 1: European allies and all that they do not see this 667 00:33:17,600 --> 00:33:20,160 Speaker 1: in any way the same way that we do. The 668 00:33:20,240 --> 00:33:24,560 Speaker 1: President Macron is in Beijing actually right now, and as 669 00:33:24,960 --> 00:33:30,080 Speaker 1: many are viewing this, Emmanuel Macrone arrived there specifically to 670 00:33:30,160 --> 00:33:33,080 Speaker 1: try to carve out a distinct role for Europe that 671 00:33:33,160 --> 00:33:37,440 Speaker 1: avoids America's confrontation with an assertive China convinced that there 672 00:33:37,480 --> 00:33:41,080 Speaker 1: is a place for China in ending the war in Ukraine. 673 00:33:41,160 --> 00:33:45,040 Speaker 1: So you can see that Macron and actually Olaf Schaltz, 674 00:33:45,400 --> 00:33:51,360 Speaker 1: the German Chancellor, also both visited Beijing recently, specifically in 675 00:33:51,480 --> 00:33:54,520 Speaker 1: the attempt to try and bring the Ukrainian conflict to 676 00:33:54,560 --> 00:33:57,000 Speaker 1: an end and to try and put Chinese pressure on 677 00:33:57,080 --> 00:34:00,600 Speaker 1: Russia to bring some sort of political settle. This was 678 00:34:00,640 --> 00:34:04,600 Speaker 1: after we should forget, not forget that Washington ruled out 679 00:34:04,800 --> 00:34:08,080 Speaker 1: the Chinese peace deal as some sort of joke and 680 00:34:08,120 --> 00:34:10,560 Speaker 1: they said that it should not be considered. Well, it 681 00:34:10,600 --> 00:34:13,759 Speaker 1: turns out that the nations with much more skin in 682 00:34:13,800 --> 00:34:15,759 Speaker 1: the game than we do in terms of their own 683 00:34:16,120 --> 00:34:19,000 Speaker 1: territorial borders, they didn't think that at all. The next 684 00:34:19,000 --> 00:34:21,319 Speaker 1: one up there on the screen two, please, there's been 685 00:34:21,360 --> 00:34:23,759 Speaker 1: a string of European leaders that have been heading over 686 00:34:23,840 --> 00:34:29,880 Speaker 1: to Beijing, EU Chancellor, the European Council, the Spanish Prime Minister, 687 00:34:30,200 --> 00:34:35,560 Speaker 1: the Francis President, and also the EU Commissioner President, President Ursula. 688 00:34:35,680 --> 00:34:38,680 Speaker 1: Vonder lyon all of those people's visits to Beijing has 689 00:34:38,719 --> 00:34:42,160 Speaker 1: specifically been with respect to do two things. Number One, 690 00:34:42,239 --> 00:34:46,160 Speaker 1: to say, hey, the US, Japan and South Korea. We're 691 00:34:46,200 --> 00:34:48,759 Speaker 1: not necessarily in any of that. They're like you and I, 692 00:34:48,880 --> 00:34:51,520 Speaker 1: like we should keep businesses going. We don't really agree 693 00:34:51,680 --> 00:34:54,759 Speaker 1: with some of their trade war practices and all of that. 694 00:34:55,160 --> 00:34:59,080 Speaker 1: A in other words, you know, acting in their material interests, 695 00:34:59,239 --> 00:35:02,719 Speaker 1: and B they want to try and help Beijing bring 696 00:35:02,800 --> 00:35:04,839 Speaker 1: some sort of end to the conflict in there. It's 697 00:35:04,880 --> 00:35:08,760 Speaker 1: just stunning to look at it again and to see France, Germany, 698 00:35:09,080 --> 00:35:12,400 Speaker 1: all of these countries, the EU, these places are underwritten 699 00:35:12,719 --> 00:35:16,239 Speaker 1: entirely by the US Global Security Alliance. We are the 700 00:35:16,239 --> 00:35:19,400 Speaker 1: ones who underwrite their militaries. We sell them all their weapons, 701 00:35:19,440 --> 00:35:21,640 Speaker 1: and we protect them with our nuclear umbrella. And then 702 00:35:21,880 --> 00:35:23,560 Speaker 1: though when it comes to China, they're going to do 703 00:35:23,600 --> 00:35:25,680 Speaker 1: what they want. I don't even bringrudge them. I would 704 00:35:25,680 --> 00:35:27,200 Speaker 1: do the same thing as some fool was willing to 705 00:35:27,200 --> 00:35:30,120 Speaker 1: pay me to do whatever l I wanted. That said, though, 706 00:35:30,280 --> 00:35:32,359 Speaker 1: I don't know why we continue to do that. Why 707 00:35:32,360 --> 00:35:34,680 Speaker 1: do we continue to just let ourselves be humiliated like 708 00:35:34,719 --> 00:35:37,480 Speaker 1: this for our so called you know what Iron brothers 709 00:35:37,760 --> 00:35:42,200 Speaker 1: and allies. But secondary Crystal they view and again they 710 00:35:42,200 --> 00:35:45,680 Speaker 1: have the territory, they have actual territorial skin here. They 711 00:35:45,800 --> 00:35:49,440 Speaker 1: view this peace deal and peace itself as an actual 712 00:35:49,520 --> 00:35:51,840 Speaker 1: goal that you should be willing to work towards with 713 00:35:52,080 --> 00:35:55,760 Speaker 1: anybody who is willing to do that. Unlike President Biden, 714 00:35:56,040 --> 00:35:59,279 Speaker 1: his National Security Council, and apparently all of the entire 715 00:35:59,360 --> 00:36:02,319 Speaker 1: Washington lead, France and Germany, especially in the lead up 716 00:36:02,320 --> 00:36:04,240 Speaker 1: to this ConfL I mean, they took a very different 717 00:36:04,280 --> 00:36:07,120 Speaker 1: approach than the US and UK. Now, some of the 718 00:36:07,120 --> 00:36:09,520 Speaker 1: schism there has kind of been papered over for a 719 00:36:09,600 --> 00:36:12,359 Speaker 1: number of months, but it's in actions like this that 720 00:36:12,400 --> 00:36:16,000 Speaker 1: you see it re emerging. They have a great, much 721 00:36:16,040 --> 00:36:19,520 Speaker 1: greater commitment to actually trying to resolve this conflict and 722 00:36:19,560 --> 00:36:22,359 Speaker 1: bring it to an end than certainly the Biden administration 723 00:36:22,640 --> 00:36:27,759 Speaker 1: has ever demonstrated, and especially with the recent comments very 724 00:36:27,760 --> 00:36:31,319 Speaker 1: clearly from the Biden administration, you know, immediately dismissing the 725 00:36:31,520 --> 00:36:36,080 Speaker 1: Chinese Peace Plan, immediately saying that any sort of offer 726 00:36:36,120 --> 00:36:38,840 Speaker 1: of a ceasefire, brokering of a ceasefire from China should 727 00:36:38,840 --> 00:36:42,520 Speaker 1: be rejected out of hand. Clearly, France and Germany have 728 00:36:42,640 --> 00:36:45,640 Speaker 1: a very different view here, and again, in my opinion, 729 00:36:45,719 --> 00:36:49,200 Speaker 1: that is very welcome because I think it benefits everyone, 730 00:36:49,360 --> 00:36:53,480 Speaker 1: including Ukrainians, to try to reach an end to this 731 00:36:53,600 --> 00:36:56,719 Speaker 1: horrific war which has been devastating to their people first 732 00:36:56,760 --> 00:36:59,680 Speaker 1: and foremost. Yeah, I think you're right, Crystal, And just 733 00:36:59,719 --> 00:37:02,680 Speaker 1: like looking at all of this and just seeing the 734 00:37:02,719 --> 00:37:06,759 Speaker 1: way that it's all coming together, it is clear that 735 00:37:06,800 --> 00:37:10,120 Speaker 1: there is a lot going on outside of Washington where 736 00:37:10,160 --> 00:37:14,240 Speaker 1: people not only disagree with us, are actively bucking us. 737 00:37:14,560 --> 00:37:16,359 Speaker 1: We are the ones at the end of the day 738 00:37:16,480 --> 00:37:19,560 Speaker 1: who might be left holding the bag quote unquote because 739 00:37:19,560 --> 00:37:22,560 Speaker 1: we're the ones basically funding the entire conflict and b 740 00:37:23,200 --> 00:37:25,319 Speaker 1: if it does come to sort of settlement and we 741 00:37:25,360 --> 00:37:28,240 Speaker 1: don't have a major role playing in that and actually 742 00:37:28,280 --> 00:37:31,439 Speaker 1: bringing that about, what is the conclusion for the rest 743 00:37:31,480 --> 00:37:34,920 Speaker 1: of the world, especially in a post Iraq environment, is 744 00:37:34,960 --> 00:37:37,600 Speaker 1: that we are belligerents, that we are opposition to peace, 745 00:37:37,760 --> 00:37:40,080 Speaker 1: that we don't care about peace. And that was something 746 00:37:40,120 --> 00:37:43,319 Speaker 1: that we worked so hard after the perst World War 747 00:37:43,400 --> 00:37:47,680 Speaker 1: two order to establish that as a given. And sure 748 00:37:47,760 --> 00:37:51,360 Speaker 1: Vietnam was bad, but you know, during that basically that 749 00:37:51,600 --> 00:37:55,320 Speaker 1: entire period, it was it was a given that any 750 00:37:55,400 --> 00:37:59,960 Speaker 1: international settlement would be Washington led. And now that's breaking up, 751 00:38:00,239 --> 00:38:03,520 Speaker 1: and it's just even more of a sign of multipolarity. Absolutely, 752 00:38:03,560 --> 00:38:06,239 Speaker 1: all right, let's go to Nordstream. This is just one 753 00:38:06,280 --> 00:38:08,880 Speaker 1: of the most laughable things that you are ever going 754 00:38:08,960 --> 00:38:11,839 Speaker 1: to read. And I almost I'm with a straight face, 755 00:38:11,920 --> 00:38:15,000 Speaker 1: going to attempt to show you what the new intelligence 756 00:38:15,080 --> 00:38:17,799 Speaker 1: is showing you around the nord Stream pipeline bomb that's 757 00:38:17,800 --> 00:38:20,800 Speaker 1: going to put this up there on the screen. Investigators 758 00:38:20,880 --> 00:38:24,600 Speaker 1: are skeptical of a yacht's role in the nord Stream 759 00:38:24,880 --> 00:38:29,480 Speaker 1: pipeline bombing. Officials believe more than one vessel might have 760 00:38:29,560 --> 00:38:33,440 Speaker 1: been involved in sabotaging the natural gas pipeline and wonder 761 00:38:33,560 --> 00:38:37,400 Speaker 1: if a fifty foot sailing yacht that investigators have scoured 762 00:38:37,440 --> 00:38:41,680 Speaker 1: for clues could be a decoy. Yeah you think. Officials 763 00:38:41,680 --> 00:38:44,359 Speaker 1: hope that the true purpose of this quote unquote deep 764 00:38:44,360 --> 00:38:48,120 Speaker 1: sea demolition will provide further insight into high stakes international 765 00:38:48,160 --> 00:38:51,120 Speaker 1: who done it, who could eventually lead to the response 766 00:38:51,160 --> 00:38:55,280 Speaker 1: who is responsible and explain their motives. US and European 767 00:38:55,280 --> 00:38:57,799 Speaker 1: officials said they still don't know for sure who is 768 00:38:57,880 --> 00:39:02,439 Speaker 1: behind the underwater attack said that they shared German skepticism 769 00:39:02,680 --> 00:39:05,120 Speaker 1: that a crew of six on a sailboat laid out 770 00:39:05,200 --> 00:39:09,359 Speaker 1: hundreds of pounds of explosives that disabled the Nordstream pipeline. 771 00:39:09,480 --> 00:39:12,880 Speaker 1: Experts noted while it was theoretically possible to do that 772 00:39:13,000 --> 00:39:17,160 Speaker 1: pipeline by hand, even skilled divers would be challenged submerging 773 00:39:17,200 --> 00:39:20,080 Speaker 1: more than two hundred feet to the seabed, slowly rising 774 00:39:20,080 --> 00:39:22,960 Speaker 1: to the surface to allow time for their bodies to decompress. 775 00:39:23,040 --> 00:39:25,760 Speaker 1: In other words, this was a professional job that basically 776 00:39:25,800 --> 00:39:28,279 Speaker 1: only a nation state could do. And the idea that 777 00:39:28,320 --> 00:39:33,280 Speaker 1: some Ukrainian rotary club that happened to, you know, acquire 778 00:39:33,400 --> 00:39:36,000 Speaker 1: this fifty foot sailing boat and just row it on 779 00:39:36,120 --> 00:39:39,080 Speaker 1: out there by themselves, by their own gumption, and then 780 00:39:39,200 --> 00:39:41,839 Speaker 1: you know, professionally dove down two hundred feet and then 781 00:39:41,880 --> 00:39:44,800 Speaker 1: stuck a bunch of C four all on this controlled 782 00:39:44,800 --> 00:39:49,480 Speaker 1: deminition with military grade explosives just seems a little bit skeptical. 783 00:39:49,760 --> 00:39:52,360 Speaker 1: My personal favorite quote from the entire thing, let's go 784 00:39:52,480 --> 00:39:55,040 Speaker 1: and put this up there on the screen, is this, 785 00:39:55,120 --> 00:39:57,160 Speaker 1: and I'm going to read it in full. At the 786 00:39:57,200 --> 00:40:00,359 Speaker 1: gatherings of European and NATO policymakers, officials have sett into 787 00:40:00,360 --> 00:40:03,920 Speaker 1: a rhythm. Don't talk about Nordstream leaders see little benefit 788 00:40:03,960 --> 00:40:08,120 Speaker 1: from digging too deeply and finding an uncomfortable answer, echoing 789 00:40:08,160 --> 00:40:11,200 Speaker 1: sentiments of several peers in other countries who said they 790 00:40:11,239 --> 00:40:14,080 Speaker 1: would rather not have to deal with the possibility that 791 00:40:14,200 --> 00:40:19,680 Speaker 1: Ukraine or allies were involved interesting or allies. I think 792 00:40:19,719 --> 00:40:22,080 Speaker 1: that's the first time that we've ever seen that, and 793 00:40:22,120 --> 00:40:24,839 Speaker 1: that just opens up the entire discussion as to how 794 00:40:24,880 --> 00:40:27,160 Speaker 1: all this is playing out. I mean, originally, you know, 795 00:40:27,280 --> 00:40:30,200 Speaker 1: nobody knew either way. Of course, there were suspicions on 796 00:40:30,280 --> 00:40:33,359 Speaker 1: both sides, and you had the crazy tweet there from 797 00:40:33,400 --> 00:40:36,920 Speaker 1: the Polish MP who said, thank you USA for breaking 798 00:40:37,120 --> 00:40:39,680 Speaker 1: blowing the pipeline before you then deleted it. But yeah, 799 00:40:39,680 --> 00:40:41,400 Speaker 1: I didn't want to speak to declaratively or any of that. 800 00:40:41,520 --> 00:40:45,479 Speaker 1: Despite suspicions. Then though, the New York Times went through 801 00:40:45,560 --> 00:40:48,359 Speaker 1: the CIA leaks comes out and it's like, no, no, no no, 802 00:40:48,520 --> 00:40:50,799 Speaker 1: it was the Ukrainians, Like, the Ukraines are the ones 803 00:40:50,840 --> 00:40:53,040 Speaker 1: who did we see Ukrainian hand But by the ways, 804 00:40:53,120 --> 00:40:54,520 Speaker 1: Lensky didn't have anything to do with it, so don't 805 00:40:54,520 --> 00:40:55,880 Speaker 1: worry about that. It was just like a bunch of 806 00:40:55,960 --> 00:40:59,319 Speaker 1: rogue private Ukrainians that happened to do this. But then 807 00:40:59,480 --> 00:41:02,600 Speaker 1: obviously everyone was like, well, how did the Ukrainians have 808 00:41:02,680 --> 00:41:04,880 Speaker 1: this technology? Like how do they have the you know, 809 00:41:04,920 --> 00:41:08,160 Speaker 1: the logistics, the wherewithal to pull off the operation like this, 810 00:41:08,280 --> 00:41:11,960 Speaker 1: and so increasingly these European allies are like, yeah, we 811 00:41:11,960 --> 00:41:14,040 Speaker 1: just don't really want to know who blew up the pipeline, 812 00:41:14,120 --> 00:41:16,960 Speaker 1: which is actually crazy because at the time they considered 813 00:41:17,000 --> 00:41:19,360 Speaker 1: it one of the most significant acts outside of the 814 00:41:19,360 --> 00:41:22,120 Speaker 1: conflict and thought it was a genuine act of war 815 00:41:22,400 --> 00:41:25,000 Speaker 1: by the Russians, with fears that it would spiral into 816 00:41:25,040 --> 00:41:28,360 Speaker 1: a global conflict. But now even though per their words, 817 00:41:28,400 --> 00:41:30,640 Speaker 1: they thought it was threatening, you know, the global order 818 00:41:30,680 --> 00:41:32,759 Speaker 1: and their own energy supply and all that, like, noah, 819 00:41:32,840 --> 00:41:34,600 Speaker 1: now we have no aga, let's just yeah, let's just 820 00:41:34,640 --> 00:41:36,560 Speaker 1: move on. Let's just move on. They actually had another 821 00:41:36,600 --> 00:41:38,759 Speaker 1: piece in here. They said it's like a corpse at 822 00:41:38,760 --> 00:41:42,439 Speaker 1: a family gathering. This European diplomat said, everyone can see 823 00:41:42,480 --> 00:41:45,440 Speaker 1: there's a body lying there, but pretends things are normal. 824 00:41:45,680 --> 00:41:49,560 Speaker 1: It's better not to know, Okay, I mean, it is amazing, 825 00:41:49,600 --> 00:41:53,359 Speaker 1: and it is also amazing how pathetic that explanation they 826 00:41:53,400 --> 00:41:55,600 Speaker 1: tried to run in the New York Times of like, oh, 827 00:41:55,680 --> 00:41:59,200 Speaker 1: it's at this little like dinky yacht and a group 828 00:41:59,239 --> 00:42:03,520 Speaker 1: of Ukrainian affiliated you know, partisans but not affiliated with 829 00:42:03,560 --> 00:42:06,640 Speaker 1: the government, just the Ukrainian Rotary Club operating on their 830 00:42:06,719 --> 00:42:11,880 Speaker 1: own with such obvious bullshit that even the mainstream press 831 00:42:11,920 --> 00:42:16,360 Speaker 1: had to acknowledge that this seems utterly preposterous. But of 832 00:42:16,400 --> 00:42:18,520 Speaker 1: course they won't give any credence to the reporting from 833 00:42:18,680 --> 00:42:22,880 Speaker 1: Seymour Hirsh, you know, with all the details about you know, 834 00:42:22,920 --> 00:42:26,520 Speaker 1: what his sources suggest actually happened. With regards to the 835 00:42:26,640 --> 00:42:29,680 Speaker 1: US potentially being involved in blowing this thing up, it 836 00:42:29,800 --> 00:42:34,520 Speaker 1: really is beyond parody, and it is important to underscore 837 00:42:34,920 --> 00:42:37,759 Speaker 1: this is an act of international terror. I mean this. 838 00:42:38,160 --> 00:42:41,080 Speaker 1: They were not wrong in the initial assessment that this 839 00:42:41,280 --> 00:42:43,880 Speaker 1: is a gigantic deal, that it is an act of 840 00:42:43,960 --> 00:42:47,120 Speaker 1: war that is a dramatic escalation, But now that it 841 00:42:47,160 --> 00:42:51,000 Speaker 1: looks increasingly clear and sort of undeniable that it was 842 00:42:51,280 --> 00:42:55,200 Speaker 1: Ukraine or their allies quote unquote, now they're like, well, 843 00:42:55,360 --> 00:42:57,640 Speaker 1: maybe it wasn't such a big deal and we should 844 00:42:57,680 --> 00:43:00,960 Speaker 1: just not talk about it. It's just Lauren, it's a joke. Amazing. Yeah, 845 00:43:01,000 --> 00:43:04,680 Speaker 1: the ongoing investigation apparently is dead, so I guess we'll 846 00:43:04,719 --> 00:43:07,759 Speaker 1: never know who blew up the noise. All right, let's 847 00:43:07,760 --> 00:43:10,279 Speaker 1: go to the next part here. Some significant news also 848 00:43:10,320 --> 00:43:12,439 Speaker 1: that happened just a couple of days ago April fourth, 849 00:43:12,560 --> 00:43:14,080 Speaker 1: let's go and put this up there on the screen. 850 00:43:14,160 --> 00:43:17,560 Speaker 1: The official release from NATO. Finland has now officially become 851 00:43:17,680 --> 00:43:21,239 Speaker 1: NATO's newest member as of April fourth, twenty twenty three, 852 00:43:21,360 --> 00:43:24,120 Speaker 1: where the flag of Finland was raised upon the North 853 00:43:24,160 --> 00:43:27,759 Speaker 1: Atlantic Treaty Alliance's office in Brussels, where they signed the 854 00:43:27,760 --> 00:43:31,000 Speaker 1: Finland Ascension Protocol on July fifth of twenty twenty two, 855 00:43:31,239 --> 00:43:35,800 Speaker 1: after all thirty national parliaments voted to ratify the country's membership. 856 00:43:35,880 --> 00:43:39,560 Speaker 1: So currently Sweden is also working its way through the process. 857 00:43:39,640 --> 00:43:43,200 Speaker 1: I believe they had to strike some deal with Erdowan 858 00:43:43,480 --> 00:43:46,400 Speaker 1: and with Turkey around the PKK in order to do so. 859 00:43:46,440 --> 00:43:50,359 Speaker 1: It's just amusing also interestingly, right Turkey the only nation 860 00:43:50,480 --> 00:43:53,120 Speaker 1: in NATO that was like, listen, yeah, sure, we'll give 861 00:43:53,160 --> 00:43:54,600 Speaker 1: it to you, but you actually have to give something 862 00:43:54,760 --> 00:43:58,799 Speaker 1: to us. It's amazing once again that other countries look 863 00:43:58,800 --> 00:44:02,080 Speaker 1: at things in print quid pro quos. We are effectively 864 00:44:02,239 --> 00:44:07,200 Speaker 1: embracing the new and extending the US nuclear umbrella to Finland, 865 00:44:07,239 --> 00:44:09,640 Speaker 1: a nation which we never had a security guarantee with 866 00:44:09,840 --> 00:44:14,320 Speaker 1: ever before, which with eight hundred miles of now new 867 00:44:14,520 --> 00:44:19,480 Speaker 1: NATO border with Russia, and there was not one debate 868 00:44:19,800 --> 00:44:23,520 Speaker 1: or consternation in this country about doing so. This is 869 00:44:23,560 --> 00:44:27,000 Speaker 1: a monumentally strategic decision. You can look at it and 870 00:44:27,040 --> 00:44:30,160 Speaker 1: not say that it hasn't dramatically changed the face of Europe. Now, 871 00:44:30,200 --> 00:44:32,359 Speaker 1: if you in the comments want to comment about why 872 00:44:32,400 --> 00:44:34,759 Speaker 1: you're willing to go die for the fate of Helsinki, 873 00:44:34,800 --> 00:44:37,879 Speaker 1: you know you can be my guest. However, Russia has 874 00:44:37,920 --> 00:44:39,840 Speaker 1: now responded, let's go and put this up there on 875 00:44:39,840 --> 00:44:44,719 Speaker 1: the screen. Russia says Finland's NATO ascension is a dangerous 876 00:44:44,760 --> 00:44:48,120 Speaker 1: and historic mistake. Russia said on Tuesday that the ascension 877 00:44:48,120 --> 00:44:51,319 Speaker 1: to NATO's military alliance was a historic mistake that would 878 00:44:51,360 --> 00:44:54,840 Speaker 1: weaken security in the wider region, increase the risk of conflict, 879 00:44:54,840 --> 00:44:59,160 Speaker 1: and force Moscow to take countermeasures. That's basically the most 880 00:44:59,160 --> 00:45:02,319 Speaker 1: fulsome comments that they've made on it so far. That 881 00:45:02,360 --> 00:45:05,200 Speaker 1: they even had some pro Kremlin activists apparently in Moscow 882 00:45:05,640 --> 00:45:08,799 Speaker 1: but with anti NATO demonstrations. Who knows if that's true 883 00:45:08,840 --> 00:45:11,160 Speaker 1: or not. But look from a broader strategic point of 884 00:45:11,239 --> 00:45:14,840 Speaker 1: view this, let's say you believe the Russians on their face, 885 00:45:14,920 --> 00:45:18,360 Speaker 1: they said that the reason that they were invading Ukraine 886 00:45:18,480 --> 00:45:21,080 Speaker 1: was because that Ukraine was getting too close to NATO 887 00:45:21,200 --> 00:45:23,640 Speaker 1: and to prevent any sort of ascension. So then the 888 00:45:23,680 --> 00:45:26,080 Speaker 1: West was like, well, to make sure that this never 889 00:45:26,120 --> 00:45:29,880 Speaker 1: happens again, we should then induct new countries into NATO 890 00:45:30,120 --> 00:45:32,319 Speaker 1: because Russia said that NATO was getting too close to 891 00:45:32,360 --> 00:45:35,160 Speaker 1: its border, so we're getting even closer to their border. Now. 892 00:45:35,239 --> 00:45:38,439 Speaker 1: I can already hear the screeches about how it would 893 00:45:38,440 --> 00:45:41,760 Speaker 1: be appeasement not to let Finland and Sweden into NATO. 894 00:45:41,800 --> 00:45:43,319 Speaker 1: I mean, I didn't say that you wouldn't help them 895 00:45:43,360 --> 00:45:45,080 Speaker 1: if they got into a conflict. I just said, hey, 896 00:45:45,120 --> 00:45:48,360 Speaker 1: you know, if you're in NATO now we're basically blood brothers, 897 00:45:48,360 --> 00:45:50,360 Speaker 1: and we have to go to nuclear war on your behalf. 898 00:45:50,640 --> 00:45:53,600 Speaker 1: That seems kind of concerning. I'm just wondering exactly what 899 00:45:53,680 --> 00:45:57,360 Speaker 1: you bring to the alliance. Finland and Sweden, two countries 900 00:45:57,400 --> 00:46:01,160 Speaker 1: which are massive welfare states with less than two percent 901 00:46:01,320 --> 00:46:05,319 Speaker 1: national spending on GDP for literally for years. What are 902 00:46:05,360 --> 00:46:09,080 Speaker 1: you doing for us? I would be apparently a trader 903 00:46:09,600 --> 00:46:13,160 Speaker 1: and a pro Kremlin activist to be asking these types 904 00:46:13,160 --> 00:46:16,799 Speaker 1: of questions, which I would just remind everyone there's a 905 00:46:16,800 --> 00:46:19,600 Speaker 1: great book called The Wise Men about the people who 906 00:46:19,600 --> 00:46:23,920 Speaker 1: built the post Cold War or the post war nineteen 907 00:46:24,000 --> 00:46:28,759 Speaker 1: forty five International order. These were, as the title alludes, to, 908 00:46:29,080 --> 00:46:32,480 Speaker 1: the wise men who went through the horrors of the 909 00:46:32,520 --> 00:46:34,640 Speaker 1: Cold War and of the Second World War and watched 910 00:46:34,640 --> 00:46:38,480 Speaker 1: fifty five million people die and decided to be cold 911 00:46:38,520 --> 00:46:41,719 Speaker 1: blooded strategic analysts to try and forge a path through 912 00:46:41,719 --> 00:46:43,920 Speaker 1: the Cold War in which the world would not be 913 00:46:43,960 --> 00:46:47,840 Speaker 1: annihilated through nuclear war. One of those men was George Kennon, 914 00:46:47,960 --> 00:46:51,200 Speaker 1: and George Kennon who we have spoken repeatedly about here 915 00:46:51,280 --> 00:46:53,200 Speaker 1: on the show, and I did an entire monologue about 916 00:46:53,200 --> 00:46:55,800 Speaker 1: some of his private thoughts about NATO expansion, and others 917 00:46:56,040 --> 00:47:01,440 Speaker 1: warned repeatedly about expanding NATO eastward, specifically to avoid some 918 00:47:01,560 --> 00:47:04,279 Speaker 1: nightmare scenario like this one. Now again I want to 919 00:47:04,280 --> 00:47:07,400 Speaker 1: represent the counterview. The counterview is is that US security 920 00:47:07,400 --> 00:47:10,960 Speaker 1: guarantees to Finland and to Sweden guarantees that those nations 921 00:47:11,000 --> 00:47:13,239 Speaker 1: never will be invaded because the cost would be so 922 00:47:13,400 --> 00:47:16,480 Speaker 1: high to the Russians and extends broader peace and security, 923 00:47:16,719 --> 00:47:19,399 Speaker 1: you know, throughout the European continent. And maybe you're right, 924 00:47:19,480 --> 00:47:21,560 Speaker 1: but the problem that I always come back to is 925 00:47:21,560 --> 00:47:23,960 Speaker 1: if you're wrong, now we are literally going to nuke 926 00:47:24,080 --> 00:47:27,120 Speaker 1: Russia on behalf of the fate of Helsinki. And you 927 00:47:27,120 --> 00:47:29,600 Speaker 1: know I've said this before, helsinc have been there. It's fine, 928 00:47:29,680 --> 00:47:32,960 Speaker 1: it's a nice place. That said though, just looking at it, 929 00:47:33,120 --> 00:47:36,040 Speaker 1: as I alluded to earlier in our show cold Hard 930 00:47:36,320 --> 00:47:40,160 Speaker 1: balance sheet trade with Finland, what is Finland bringing to us? 931 00:47:40,440 --> 00:47:42,680 Speaker 1: What exactly are we getting out of this? I don't 932 00:47:42,719 --> 00:47:45,359 Speaker 1: see it. I don't see why we should annihilate our 933 00:47:45,520 --> 00:47:49,879 Speaker 1: entire country for hell Sinki or for Stockholm. Once again, 934 00:47:49,920 --> 00:47:52,040 Speaker 1: they're nice places, but I don't know why their fate 935 00:47:52,200 --> 00:47:55,600 Speaker 1: literally matters to us here at all. Nobody can answer 936 00:47:55,640 --> 00:47:57,799 Speaker 1: that question. Yeah, I think you lay that out all 937 00:47:57,960 --> 00:48:00,680 Speaker 1: very well. There's just two pieces that I would add. 938 00:48:00,880 --> 00:48:03,439 Speaker 1: Number One, we made a mistake in the past by 939 00:48:03,760 --> 00:48:06,560 Speaker 1: not listening to our adversaries and what they were saying 940 00:48:06,600 --> 00:48:09,600 Speaker 1: and taking serious what they were saying. Now, Russia is 941 00:48:09,640 --> 00:48:12,719 Speaker 1: responsible for the invasions. They're bald, it's illegal, one hundred 942 00:48:12,760 --> 00:48:15,640 Speaker 1: percent all of that stuff. However, there is no doubt 943 00:48:16,239 --> 00:48:20,439 Speaker 1: that our actions in expanding NATO eastward, after basically saying 944 00:48:20,480 --> 00:48:24,640 Speaker 1: that we wouldn't and over and above the vociferous objections 945 00:48:24,680 --> 00:48:27,239 Speaker 1: of Russia, that we sort of just swatted aside as 946 00:48:27,520 --> 00:48:32,400 Speaker 1: bluster and nonsense and big talk, but no action. Clearly 947 00:48:32,680 --> 00:48:36,200 Speaker 1: that helped provide a justification in terms of Russia's view 948 00:48:36,640 --> 00:48:40,480 Speaker 1: for this war, illegal war that they launched in Ukraine. 949 00:48:40,560 --> 00:48:43,040 Speaker 1: So that's number one. We never learned the mistake of 950 00:48:43,239 --> 00:48:45,520 Speaker 1: you actually have to listen to your adversaries and take 951 00:48:45,560 --> 00:48:49,000 Speaker 1: serious seriously what they're saying. The other thing that I 952 00:48:49,000 --> 00:48:51,759 Speaker 1: would say here is, you know, I think in a sense, 953 00:48:51,800 --> 00:48:54,440 Speaker 1: and we've been talking a lot about China and how 954 00:48:54,480 --> 00:48:57,239 Speaker 1: they're viewing this conflict and how in certain ways they 955 00:48:57,400 --> 00:49:00,680 Speaker 1: have really benefited from this conflict. It really has forced 956 00:49:00,760 --> 00:49:04,560 Speaker 1: into view what was probably already there, which is a 957 00:49:04,600 --> 00:49:08,359 Speaker 1: new multipolar reality. I think this has been This war 958 00:49:08,400 --> 00:49:11,600 Speaker 1: has been a disaster though for Russia because the last 959 00:49:11,600 --> 00:49:15,680 Speaker 1: thing they wanted was a NATO expansion. And so even 960 00:49:15,719 --> 00:49:18,600 Speaker 1: as I you know, obviously share your concerns about what 961 00:49:18,640 --> 00:49:21,759 Speaker 1: this means for us as well, they are very very 962 00:49:21,840 --> 00:49:24,440 Speaker 1: unhappy with this, and it's the polar opposite of the 963 00:49:24,480 --> 00:49:27,520 Speaker 1: result that they would have wanted to see in terms 964 00:49:27,600 --> 00:49:30,520 Speaker 1: of prosecuting this war. So those are the only two 965 00:49:30,560 --> 00:49:32,160 Speaker 1: pieces that I would add to Oh you should add. 966 00:49:32,200 --> 00:49:35,080 Speaker 1: I mean, look, that's all I think it should be given. Obviously, 967 00:49:35,120 --> 00:49:36,920 Speaker 1: it's been a disaster for them. This is one of 968 00:49:36,960 --> 00:49:39,880 Speaker 1: the dumbest things that they've ever done. They've wasted probably 969 00:49:40,040 --> 00:49:42,360 Speaker 1: hundreds of billions of rubles on them if they crippled 970 00:49:42,360 --> 00:49:46,000 Speaker 1: their economy, They've become pariahsed in the eyes of the world. 971 00:49:46,040 --> 00:49:48,920 Speaker 1: They've increased defense spending in Germany and France, which is 972 00:49:49,000 --> 00:49:52,759 Speaker 1: literally a miracle because there were some cheap asses over there, 973 00:49:53,080 --> 00:49:55,839 Speaker 1: and you know, it hasn't worked out well for them, 974 00:49:55,880 --> 00:49:59,239 Speaker 1: and no matter what decades from now, it won't. The 975 00:49:59,280 --> 00:50:01,799 Speaker 1: real question is what do you do about it? You're like, 976 00:50:01,840 --> 00:50:03,640 Speaker 1: do you want to keep kicking them when they're down 977 00:50:03,880 --> 00:50:06,640 Speaker 1: and assume that they'll always be down? You could think that, 978 00:50:06,760 --> 00:50:08,640 Speaker 1: you know, that's basically what we did throughout the nineteen 979 00:50:08,719 --> 00:50:11,200 Speaker 1: nineties and the two thousands. We said, look at this country, 980 00:50:11,200 --> 00:50:13,839 Speaker 1: it's a joke. They just lost half their territory through 981 00:50:13,880 --> 00:50:17,680 Speaker 1: the USSR. They're economically in the middle of a nightmare. 982 00:50:17,760 --> 00:50:21,680 Speaker 1: You know, during all this, during the transition from communism 983 00:50:21,880 --> 00:50:25,760 Speaker 1: to free market capitalism, they're basically got gangster oligarchs running 984 00:50:25,760 --> 00:50:27,239 Speaker 1: their country. What are they going to do if we 985 00:50:27,280 --> 00:50:30,640 Speaker 1: expand an Ato into Estonia and Finland. Fast forward twenty 986 00:50:30,640 --> 00:50:33,040 Speaker 1: two years and you find out so that's one of 987 00:50:33,040 --> 00:50:36,239 Speaker 1: those where look, this is irrevocable. You can't take it back. 988 00:50:36,480 --> 00:50:39,960 Speaker 1: It's not a temporary action. I can tell you right now. 989 00:50:40,040 --> 00:50:42,959 Speaker 1: There were only like four people in nineteen ninety eight, 990 00:50:43,080 --> 00:50:45,560 Speaker 1: whenever all of this was being considered in the US 991 00:50:45,600 --> 00:50:48,200 Speaker 1: public sphere, that were like, hey, you may want to 992 00:50:48,200 --> 00:50:50,160 Speaker 1: think twice about this. One of them was George Kennon, 993 00:50:50,239 --> 00:50:52,359 Speaker 1: the guy who warned and built the post world Cold 994 00:50:52,400 --> 00:50:55,640 Speaker 1: War order and they literally the father of a containment strategy, 995 00:50:55,760 --> 00:50:58,880 Speaker 1: and he said, there may come a time when Moscow feels, 996 00:50:59,120 --> 00:51:01,120 Speaker 1: you know, like they have been encircled, and that they 997 00:51:01,200 --> 00:51:03,920 Speaker 1: may retaliate out as a result of that. This is 998 00:51:03,920 --> 00:51:06,799 Speaker 1: not a justification. It's only to say Russia is going 999 00:51:06,840 --> 00:51:10,000 Speaker 1: to exist. You know, unless you are the most online 1000 00:51:10,160 --> 00:51:12,719 Speaker 1: NAPO person in the world, Russia is not just going 1001 00:51:12,800 --> 00:51:16,000 Speaker 1: to die anytime soon, and so you should assume it'll 1002 00:51:16,000 --> 00:51:18,520 Speaker 1: probably be around in some form in the next twenty 1003 00:51:18,560 --> 00:51:21,960 Speaker 1: five years. You should also assume that Putin is not 1004 00:51:22,040 --> 00:51:24,560 Speaker 1: just the expression of like who he is, but is 1005 00:51:25,080 --> 00:51:29,160 Speaker 1: expressing a longstanding tradition. Frankly in terms of how Russian 1006 00:51:29,239 --> 00:51:31,960 Speaker 1: leaders view their security situation. So even if he is 1007 00:51:32,080 --> 00:51:34,960 Speaker 1: dead twenty five years from now, where is the guarantee 1008 00:51:35,120 --> 00:51:38,600 Speaker 1: that the future leader will have learned anything or isn't 1009 00:51:38,640 --> 00:51:42,719 Speaker 1: even more hawkish and warlike than Vladimir Putin? Right? Are 1010 00:51:42,760 --> 00:51:46,160 Speaker 1: you setting the table for a future piece or are 1011 00:51:46,160 --> 00:51:49,319 Speaker 1: you setting the table for what the next conflict is 1012 00:51:49,360 --> 00:51:51,440 Speaker 1: going to look like? And very much my fear with 1013 00:51:51,520 --> 00:51:54,120 Speaker 1: the further expansion of NATO as that we are just 1014 00:51:54,160 --> 00:51:57,560 Speaker 1: setting ourselves up for further conflict in the future. Absolutely, 1015 00:52:00,560 --> 00:52:03,240 Speaker 1: let's talk a little bit about what we just learned. 1016 00:52:03,280 --> 00:52:06,240 Speaker 1: In terms of twenty twenty four politics, everybody is sending 1017 00:52:06,280 --> 00:52:10,720 Speaker 1: in their big fundraising numbers for the first quarter. Nikki 1018 00:52:10,800 --> 00:52:14,040 Speaker 1: Hayley is bragging about the number that she was able 1019 00:52:14,080 --> 00:52:16,080 Speaker 1: to post. Let's go and put this up on the screen. 1020 00:52:16,360 --> 00:52:19,880 Speaker 1: Apparently she announced she raised more than eleven million dollars 1021 00:52:19,960 --> 00:52:24,200 Speaker 1: in the six weeks since she announced. This person indicates 1022 00:52:24,280 --> 00:52:27,000 Speaker 1: that for comparison, the Trump campaign says he raised upwards 1023 00:52:27,040 --> 00:52:29,760 Speaker 1: of ten million just since the news of his formal 1024 00:52:29,800 --> 00:52:32,759 Speaker 1: indictment broke on Thursday, So it does take a little 1025 00:52:32,760 --> 00:52:35,680 Speaker 1: bit of the windown of the sales, but Nevertheless, eleven 1026 00:52:35,719 --> 00:52:40,240 Speaker 1: million dollars is a significant sum. I crunch the numbers. 1027 00:52:40,280 --> 00:52:42,680 Speaker 1: Her average donation is something like one hundred and fifty 1028 00:52:42,719 --> 00:52:47,040 Speaker 1: six dollars. A person comes from seventy thousand donations, and 1029 00:52:47,360 --> 00:52:49,720 Speaker 1: a number of them, she says, are two hundred dollars 1030 00:52:49,840 --> 00:52:53,040 Speaker 1: or less. So they're very excited about this. But you know, 1031 00:52:53,120 --> 00:52:55,120 Speaker 1: Sagom and I look at it. I mean, first of all, 1032 00:52:55,120 --> 00:52:57,120 Speaker 1: I don't know that I ever doubted Nikki Haley would 1033 00:52:57,160 --> 00:52:59,960 Speaker 1: have big money behind her. That's her whole reason for existing. 1034 00:53:00,320 --> 00:53:03,200 Speaker 1: That's the only reason why she's in the political landscape 1035 00:53:03,239 --> 00:53:05,960 Speaker 1: at all, is because she is sort of like you know, 1036 00:53:06,040 --> 00:53:08,680 Speaker 1: Kamala Harris figure that the donor class loves, even as 1037 00:53:08,680 --> 00:53:12,319 Speaker 1: there's very little public appetite for her. That's number one 1038 00:53:12,600 --> 00:53:16,560 Speaker 1: and number two. At the presidential level, money becomes so 1039 00:53:16,680 --> 00:53:19,800 Speaker 1: much less relevant when you have Donald Trump in the 1040 00:53:19,880 --> 00:53:23,400 Speaker 1: race and he literally gets millions tens of millions of 1041 00:53:23,440 --> 00:53:27,399 Speaker 1: dollars in free airtime and publicity every single day. Yeah, 1042 00:53:27,440 --> 00:53:28,919 Speaker 1: I mean, if you think about it this way too, 1043 00:53:29,160 --> 00:53:32,439 Speaker 1: Like you know, Trump was outspent almost ten to one 1044 00:53:32,520 --> 00:53:35,720 Speaker 1: in the twenty sixteen campaign, and he won. He actually 1045 00:53:36,080 --> 00:53:40,000 Speaker 1: reasspending parity or ish in twenty twenty and he lost. 1046 00:53:40,040 --> 00:53:42,640 Speaker 1: So it's not like money actually matters all that much, 1047 00:53:42,680 --> 00:53:44,920 Speaker 1: you know, And also at this level to Trump and 1048 00:53:44,960 --> 00:53:47,319 Speaker 1: presidential level. When it comes to Trump in the presidential level, 1049 00:53:47,360 --> 00:53:50,160 Speaker 1: I just don't think money is the big deciding factor here. 1050 00:53:50,200 --> 00:53:53,440 Speaker 1: I think it's cope basically on everyone's part. Now, it certainly, 1051 00:53:53,480 --> 00:53:55,719 Speaker 1: obviously it does matter, but to what level. Nobody can 1052 00:53:55,760 --> 00:53:57,880 Speaker 1: really tell you that. And just by and large, like 1053 00:53:57,960 --> 00:54:01,160 Speaker 1: insurgent campaigns have won before, you know very well, money 1054 00:54:01,239 --> 00:54:03,520 Speaker 1: campaigns have lost. If anything, there's a lot of good 1055 00:54:03,760 --> 00:54:06,640 Speaker 1: evidence on the Trump side that anytime he's hamstrung by 1056 00:54:06,640 --> 00:54:09,080 Speaker 1: a real professional organization, it actually doesn't work out as 1057 00:54:09,120 --> 00:54:11,080 Speaker 1: well for him, and that he's better in a freer 1058 00:54:11,400 --> 00:54:13,600 Speaker 1: and a loose environment. And you know, Jeb Bush had 1059 00:54:13,640 --> 00:54:15,399 Speaker 1: one hundred million dollars, Like, how did that work? Came 1060 00:54:15,400 --> 00:54:17,799 Speaker 1: in fifth place? So like there's also no evidence that 1061 00:54:17,920 --> 00:54:20,200 Speaker 1: Visa v. Trump, that running all these negative ads and 1062 00:54:20,239 --> 00:54:22,399 Speaker 1: trying to work against him, even with all the money 1063 00:54:22,440 --> 00:54:24,239 Speaker 1: in the world, is going to do a damn thing. 1064 00:54:24,440 --> 00:54:27,360 Speaker 1: So you know, Okay, congratulations Nikki Haley. I guess you 1065 00:54:27,400 --> 00:54:29,400 Speaker 1: know you can you can buy more than Scott Walker. 1066 00:54:29,440 --> 00:54:31,320 Speaker 1: Remember that. I mean the guy had thirty forty million 1067 00:54:31,360 --> 00:54:33,520 Speaker 1: dollars in the bank. Yeah, didn't do anything. I mean 1068 00:54:33,600 --> 00:54:36,120 Speaker 1: the problem of for Nicki Haley is the same problem 1069 00:54:36,200 --> 00:54:38,120 Speaker 1: that Hillary Clinton had, which is, you can have all 1070 00:54:38,160 --> 00:54:39,600 Speaker 1: the money in the world, but if you're selling a 1071 00:54:39,600 --> 00:54:42,880 Speaker 1: product that nobody wants, doesn't really make a big difference. 1072 00:54:43,360 --> 00:54:47,680 Speaker 1: We also got some numbers from Ron DeSantis' affiliated super pack. 1073 00:54:47,960 --> 00:54:51,080 Speaker 1: Let's put this up on the screen there. His pack 1074 00:54:51,160 --> 00:54:54,880 Speaker 1: is called Never Back Down. And the committee raised thirty 1075 00:54:54,880 --> 00:54:58,520 Speaker 1: million dollars in fundraising since the super pac launched back 1076 00:54:58,560 --> 00:55:02,359 Speaker 1: on March ninth, so you know, basically in a month's time. 1077 00:55:03,520 --> 00:55:06,160 Speaker 1: They said the money was raised rather than transferred from 1078 00:55:06,160 --> 00:55:09,120 Speaker 1: other committees, and half of the contributions came from donors 1079 00:55:09,160 --> 00:55:12,960 Speaker 1: outside of Florida. So also certainly plenty of money behind 1080 00:55:13,080 --> 00:55:17,000 Speaker 1: the Rohn DeSantis hope, right, Yeah, I mean thirty million dollars. 1081 00:55:17,040 --> 00:55:18,839 Speaker 1: Once again, it sounds like a lot of money if 1082 00:55:18,840 --> 00:55:20,920 Speaker 1: that's actually only one third of what Jeb Bush had 1083 00:55:21,000 --> 00:55:25,000 Speaker 1: raised whenever before he eventually even declared in it. And 1084 00:55:25,040 --> 00:55:27,719 Speaker 1: where is the evidence that money is what's where's the 1085 00:55:27,719 --> 00:55:30,839 Speaker 1: evidence that what can money buy you? Nay id in advertising. 1086 00:55:31,200 --> 00:55:33,799 Speaker 1: Is that really DeSantis' problem here, or is it that 1087 00:55:33,840 --> 00:55:37,279 Speaker 1: people like Trump more than him or may not even 1088 00:55:37,440 --> 00:55:40,359 Speaker 1: like him in the GOP primary, that they feel that 1089 00:55:40,400 --> 00:55:42,680 Speaker 1: Trump is under threat and they need to stand with 1090 00:55:42,800 --> 00:55:45,480 Speaker 1: him over this. No money in the world is going 1091 00:55:45,520 --> 00:55:47,760 Speaker 1: to fix it. And as you just said, Trump probably 1092 00:55:47,800 --> 00:55:50,120 Speaker 1: just got a billion dollars in free media just in 1093 00:55:50,160 --> 00:55:52,759 Speaker 1: the last week from the coverage that he received in 1094 00:55:52,840 --> 00:55:55,279 Speaker 1: terms of his arrest. You can outspend that. Theres are 1095 00:55:55,440 --> 00:55:59,080 Speaker 1: you can't compete with the amount of you know, unpaid 1096 00:55:59,160 --> 00:56:04,120 Speaker 1: media that Trump is able to garner just every single 1097 00:56:04,239 --> 00:56:08,279 Speaker 1: day because obviously the more that the liberal networks hate him, 1098 00:56:08,320 --> 00:56:11,080 Speaker 1: the better it is for him. And Fox News, which 1099 00:56:11,160 --> 00:56:13,120 Speaker 1: really was trying to turn the page on Trump and 1100 00:56:13,160 --> 00:56:16,120 Speaker 1: really do their Ronda sand As that boosting, you know, 1101 00:56:16,200 --> 00:56:18,520 Speaker 1: they're backed into a corner where they can't help but 1102 00:56:18,600 --> 00:56:21,200 Speaker 1: go all in on Trump coverage as well, because, as 1103 00:56:21,239 --> 00:56:23,200 Speaker 1: I think was revealed in the dominion lawsuit, like they 1104 00:56:23,239 --> 00:56:26,040 Speaker 1: just don't have control over their audience to force something 1105 00:56:26,080 --> 00:56:28,400 Speaker 1: different on them. They have to go with the flow 1106 00:56:28,560 --> 00:56:32,160 Speaker 1: of where the Republican base is at right now. And again, 1107 00:56:32,320 --> 00:56:34,680 Speaker 1: even as you know, these are impressive fundraising numbers. It's 1108 00:56:34,680 --> 00:56:37,040 Speaker 1: not like Trump isn't also raising a lot of money. 1109 00:56:37,200 --> 00:56:39,560 Speaker 1: Let's put this up on the screen. Apparently he has 1110 00:56:39,640 --> 00:56:43,040 Speaker 1: raked in ten million dollars from supporters since a Manhattan 1111 00:56:43,040 --> 00:56:46,640 Speaker 1: grand jury indicted him. They collected roughly two million on 1112 00:56:46,719 --> 00:56:50,000 Speaker 1: Tuesday alone, as Trump was being arraigned in a New 1113 00:56:50,080 --> 00:56:54,200 Speaker 1: York courtroom. And as part of that fundraising campaign, they 1114 00:56:54,200 --> 00:56:57,360 Speaker 1: actually are selling a T shirt with a fake Trump 1115 00:56:57,520 --> 00:57:02,360 Speaker 1: mugshot on it to show you how much they see 1116 00:57:03,200 --> 00:57:07,120 Speaker 1: the indictment here and you know, potential ones in the 1117 00:57:07,160 --> 00:57:09,480 Speaker 1: future as a boon for him, at least in the 1118 00:57:09,520 --> 00:57:12,360 Speaker 1: Republican primary. I think it's a different story in the 1119 00:57:12,360 --> 00:57:15,200 Speaker 1: general election. I always want to say that, but pretty 1120 00:57:15,200 --> 00:57:18,320 Speaker 1: clear in the Republican primary, his polling numbers have just 1121 00:57:18,360 --> 00:57:21,400 Speaker 1: shot through the roof. He now is the clearly dominant 1122 00:57:21,440 --> 00:57:25,360 Speaker 1: figure in terms of Republican voters, in terms of media coverage, like, 1123 00:57:25,640 --> 00:57:28,640 Speaker 1: good luck with all of your millions other contenders getting 1124 00:57:28,720 --> 00:57:31,520 Speaker 1: any oxygen and airtime in this race at this point. Yeah, 1125 00:57:31,560 --> 00:57:35,120 Speaker 1: I think it's fascinating, you know, just continuingly breaking it 1126 00:57:35,160 --> 00:57:37,280 Speaker 1: down and just looking at the way that Trump is 1127 00:57:37,320 --> 00:57:40,600 Speaker 1: able to dominate all of this like ten million dollars 1128 00:57:40,680 --> 00:57:43,720 Speaker 1: in a single week. Is again, it's not about the money. 1129 00:57:43,760 --> 00:57:46,480 Speaker 1: It's just about the expression of love and of loyalty 1130 00:57:46,480 --> 00:57:49,320 Speaker 1: that he is willing to garner from millions of small 1131 00:57:49,400 --> 00:57:53,320 Speaker 1: dollar donors that just don't exist for any other Republican candidate. 1132 00:57:53,400 --> 00:57:56,000 Speaker 1: And that's just something that he will always be able 1133 00:57:56,040 --> 00:57:58,600 Speaker 1: to tap over and over and over again, and none 1134 00:57:58,640 --> 00:58:01,520 Speaker 1: of these other yeah, actually have. It's a huge strategic 1135 00:58:01,520 --> 00:58:04,000 Speaker 1: advantage on his behalf. And also, I mean he's been 1136 00:58:04,000 --> 00:58:07,919 Speaker 1: building these lists for a lot of years now. Now 1137 00:58:08,040 --> 00:58:10,040 Speaker 1: I do think they have gone back to the well 1138 00:58:10,120 --> 00:58:12,760 Speaker 1: of these lists. I mean, he is very abusive in 1139 00:58:12,840 --> 00:58:16,680 Speaker 1: terms of the amount of fundraising emails that he sends out, 1140 00:58:16,840 --> 00:58:20,160 Speaker 1: and it has really taken away. Other Republican candidates in 1141 00:58:20,280 --> 00:58:22,880 Speaker 1: setate primaries and whatever have really complained about the way 1142 00:58:22,920 --> 00:58:26,160 Speaker 1: that the whole Republican base is like tapped out because 1143 00:58:26,200 --> 00:58:30,760 Speaker 1: the Trump operation is just constantly like clawing whatever scraps 1144 00:58:30,760 --> 00:58:35,680 Speaker 1: of dollars they can from this fundraising base. But you know, nevertheless, 1145 00:58:35,720 --> 00:58:39,320 Speaker 1: he has certainly built an extensive list, He certainly has 1146 00:58:39,480 --> 00:58:43,720 Speaker 1: a really dedicated, enthusiastic following, and you know, the more 1147 00:58:43,760 --> 00:58:47,600 Speaker 1: that they see him as being under threat, the more 1148 00:58:47,640 --> 00:58:49,600 Speaker 1: that they are likely to give. The more the media 1149 00:58:49,680 --> 00:58:52,280 Speaker 1: covers him, the more Democrats salivate about what they think 1150 00:58:52,360 --> 00:58:54,880 Speaker 1: is great for them and Donald Trump being potential next 1151 00:58:54,960 --> 00:58:58,280 Speaker 1: Republican nominee once again, and you know, just full service 1152 00:58:58,280 --> 00:59:02,600 Speaker 1: economy there for everybody fault. Yeah, absolutely, all right, couple 1153 00:59:02,680 --> 00:59:05,440 Speaker 1: of media stories that we could not resist. All right, 1154 00:59:05,880 --> 00:59:09,920 Speaker 1: you're gonna enjoy this one. So Elon Musk has been 1155 00:59:10,000 --> 00:59:14,120 Speaker 1: in full troll mode recently, taking away in your time's 1156 00:59:14,160 --> 00:59:17,240 Speaker 1: blue check mark, which is legitimately funny. And now another 1157 00:59:17,280 --> 00:59:19,720 Speaker 1: move which I also think is legitimately funny. Let's go 1158 00:59:19,760 --> 00:59:23,200 Speaker 1: and put this up on the screen. He marked NPR 1159 00:59:24,000 --> 00:59:30,240 Speaker 1: as US state affiliated media on Twitter. You know, same 1160 00:59:30,280 --> 00:59:34,400 Speaker 1: designation that like RT or whatever would ultimately get. And 1161 00:59:34,480 --> 00:59:37,400 Speaker 1: so obviously there was a lot of debate about this 1162 00:59:37,640 --> 00:59:40,640 Speaker 1: and a lot of hand ringing among liberals in particular. 1163 00:59:40,720 --> 00:59:44,920 Speaker 1: How dare you now? Just like I looked at the numbers, 1164 00:59:45,120 --> 00:59:48,640 Speaker 1: NPR does receive a significant portion, I think like ten percent. 1165 00:59:48,680 --> 00:59:50,439 Speaker 1: Hold on, I've got it. So this is where it's 1166 00:59:50,480 --> 00:59:53,360 Speaker 1: in dispute, and that's actually wanted to spend some time off. 1167 00:59:53,560 --> 00:59:57,520 Speaker 1: So they claim that they only get one percent or 1168 00:59:57,520 --> 01:00:02,280 Speaker 1: so of their operating budget from the federal government, or 1169 01:00:02,320 --> 01:00:05,800 Speaker 1: at the very least in taxpayer dollars. However, in several 1170 01:00:05,840 --> 01:00:09,960 Speaker 1: of their communications they actually say that they would be 1171 01:00:10,080 --> 01:00:14,360 Speaker 1: it would be impossible for them to actually it would 1172 01:00:14,360 --> 01:00:17,960 Speaker 1: be impossible for them to operate without federal funding. So 1173 01:00:18,080 --> 01:00:21,760 Speaker 1: the true figure is actually very unclear. But in their 1174 01:00:21,880 --> 01:00:24,680 Speaker 1: marketing dollars, from what they have put out at least 1175 01:00:24,720 --> 01:00:28,760 Speaker 1: so far, they make it clear that federal appropriations, at 1176 01:00:28,840 --> 01:00:32,280 Speaker 1: least in some cases, are basically the only reason that 1177 01:00:32,320 --> 01:00:34,880 Speaker 1: they are allowed to exist on top of their overall donors. 1178 01:00:34,880 --> 01:00:37,360 Speaker 1: So Michael Tracy has been digging into this a lot, 1179 01:00:37,680 --> 01:00:40,400 Speaker 1: and so I have one of the things that he 1180 01:00:40,560 --> 01:00:42,440 Speaker 1: pulled up here. I mean, first of all, yes, in 1181 01:00:42,440 --> 01:00:46,040 Speaker 1: their communications, they said federal funding is essential to public 1182 01:00:46,120 --> 01:00:48,760 Speaker 1: radio service in the American public and its continuation is 1183 01:00:48,760 --> 01:00:52,040 Speaker 1: critical for both stations and program producers, including and PR. 1184 01:00:52,440 --> 01:00:55,640 Speaker 1: And then they offered a breakdown of where their funding 1185 01:00:55,680 --> 01:00:59,880 Speaker 1: comes from. The plurality. Forty three percent, according to their communication, 1186 01:01:00,240 --> 01:01:04,880 Speaker 1: comes from individuals, eight percent comes from federal appropriation, and 1187 01:01:05,000 --> 01:01:09,000 Speaker 1: five percent comes from federal, state and local governments. So 1188 01:01:09,240 --> 01:01:14,280 Speaker 1: you're talking about thirteen percent there nothing coming from government entities. 1189 01:01:14,360 --> 01:01:17,040 Speaker 1: And look, by the way, I don't like I'm actually 1190 01:01:17,040 --> 01:01:22,120 Speaker 1: fine with the government like supporting nonprofit radio, PBS whatever. 1191 01:01:22,120 --> 01:01:24,680 Speaker 1: I don't have an issue with it. But there has 1192 01:01:24,760 --> 01:01:29,160 Speaker 1: always been a level of not even arbitrariness, but clear 1193 01:01:29,480 --> 01:01:33,440 Speaker 1: bias in how news outlets are labeled, whether they are 1194 01:01:33,480 --> 01:01:37,840 Speaker 1: dismissed as state propaganda or not, based on the relationship 1195 01:01:37,880 --> 01:01:41,240 Speaker 1: to like is it an Allied Nations state propaganda network, 1196 01:01:41,320 --> 01:01:44,120 Speaker 1: is it a US state propaganda network, or is it 1197 01:01:44,200 --> 01:01:48,520 Speaker 1: a you know, official US bad guy States state propaganda network. 1198 01:01:48,560 --> 01:01:50,440 Speaker 1: And that's just not just on Twitter. That's on all 1199 01:01:50,480 --> 01:01:53,280 Speaker 1: kinds of places, like things like Voice of America, which 1200 01:01:53,280 --> 01:01:56,080 Speaker 1: are truly your like the BBC right, which are truly 1201 01:01:56,240 --> 01:02:00,000 Speaker 1: I mean Voice of America is directly like American US 1202 01:02:00,040 --> 01:02:03,640 Speaker 1: government propaganda, and that doesn't get the label on certain 1203 01:02:03,680 --> 01:02:06,720 Speaker 1: platforms where of course, you know, RT which also you know, 1204 01:02:06,840 --> 01:02:09,120 Speaker 1: deserves the label and people should be aware of the 1205 01:02:09,160 --> 01:02:13,760 Speaker 1: biases inherent there consistently does so I'm not saying Elon 1206 01:02:13,920 --> 01:02:16,000 Speaker 1: is being even handed here, of course he's not. He's 1207 01:02:16,040 --> 01:02:20,480 Speaker 1: being completely biased as well. And my bigger issue I 1208 01:02:20,720 --> 01:02:22,800 Speaker 1: have complicated feelings about this because in some ways, I'm like, 1209 01:02:22,800 --> 01:02:24,640 Speaker 1: maybe our lives would all be better if Twitter just 1210 01:02:24,640 --> 01:02:26,640 Speaker 1: did like die and go away. So I can't even 1211 01:02:26,640 --> 01:02:29,760 Speaker 1: say like I'm fully mourning it. But the one silver 1212 01:02:29,880 --> 01:02:35,240 Speaker 1: lining to me is that his totally random, capricious, troll 1213 01:02:35,520 --> 01:02:41,120 Speaker 1: like behavior really demonstrates the total arbitrariness with which all 1214 01:02:41,160 --> 01:02:44,760 Speaker 1: of these platforms are really run and how much they 1215 01:02:44,760 --> 01:02:47,320 Speaker 1: are just subject to the whims of whoever happens to 1216 01:02:47,400 --> 01:02:49,880 Speaker 1: be in control. And I don't think it's a bad 1217 01:02:49,880 --> 01:02:52,160 Speaker 1: thing that that is exposed, So I see it as 1218 01:02:52,160 --> 01:02:55,600 Speaker 1: sort of silver lining, even as I find most of 1219 01:02:55,640 --> 01:02:58,240 Speaker 1: his decision making a Twitter to be a total disaster, 1220 01:02:58,360 --> 01:03:02,320 Speaker 1: and the platform is already snificantly degraded and way less 1221 01:03:02,400 --> 01:03:05,120 Speaker 1: useful and way less of a decent user experience than 1222 01:03:05,120 --> 01:03:06,960 Speaker 1: it used to be, and it already wasn't great. Yeah, 1223 01:03:06,960 --> 01:03:09,680 Speaker 1: I think you're absolutely correct, And nothing would convince you 1224 01:03:09,720 --> 01:03:12,000 Speaker 1: that NPR is not state media than the White House 1225 01:03:12,000 --> 01:03:16,400 Speaker 1: Press Secretary coming to their defense. Yeah. So social media 1226 01:03:16,480 --> 01:03:19,960 Speaker 1: companies make their own independent decisions about content rules, so 1227 01:03:19,960 --> 01:03:21,960 Speaker 1: I won't comment on Twitter's rules, But what I will 1228 01:03:21,960 --> 01:03:26,440 Speaker 1: say more broadly, I'll say there's no doubt of the 1229 01:03:26,440 --> 01:03:31,480 Speaker 1: independence of NPR's journalists and has been. If you've ever 1230 01:03:31,520 --> 01:03:34,600 Speaker 1: been on the receiving end of their questions, that you 1231 01:03:34,680 --> 01:03:37,800 Speaker 1: know this, You know that they have their independence and journalism. 1232 01:03:38,200 --> 01:03:42,400 Speaker 1: NPR journalists work digitally to hold public officials accountable and 1233 01:03:42,440 --> 01:03:46,920 Speaker 1: inform the American people. The hard hitting independence nature of 1234 01:03:46,960 --> 01:03:50,760 Speaker 1: their coverage speaks for itself. Why does she have a 1235 01:03:50,800 --> 01:03:55,160 Speaker 1: prepared statement defending NPR is not state media whend she's 1236 01:03:55,280 --> 01:04:00,800 Speaker 1: the government propagandist. That's nuts. That actually convinces you the opposite. 1237 01:04:00,880 --> 01:04:03,520 Speaker 1: NPR's managing editor also put out a very upset statement 1238 01:04:03,560 --> 01:04:05,240 Speaker 1: that's put this up there on the screen. We were 1239 01:04:05,320 --> 01:04:08,200 Speaker 1: very disturbed to see last night. Twitter has labeled NPR 1240 01:04:08,240 --> 01:04:11,120 Speaker 1: state media. Description that per our guidelines, does not apply 1241 01:04:11,200 --> 01:04:13,680 Speaker 1: to NPR. NPR and member stations are supported by millions 1242 01:04:13,680 --> 01:04:16,280 Speaker 1: of listeners who depend on us for independent, fact chase 1243 01:04:16,400 --> 01:04:19,280 Speaker 1: journalism that we provide. NPR stands for freedom of speech 1244 01:04:19,320 --> 01:04:22,440 Speaker 1: and holding the powerful accountable. It is unacceptable for Twitter 1245 01:04:22,480 --> 01:04:25,360 Speaker 1: to label us this way. A vibrant, figorous free press 1246 01:04:25,400 --> 01:04:28,440 Speaker 1: is essential to the health of our democracy. But some 1247 01:04:28,520 --> 01:04:32,240 Speaker 1: of us didn't yet. Forget about a tweet sent in 1248 01:04:32,320 --> 01:04:34,840 Speaker 1: October of twenty twenty let's go ahead and put this 1249 01:04:34,960 --> 01:04:38,080 Speaker 1: up there on the screen. From the NPR public editor, 1250 01:04:38,400 --> 01:04:41,960 Speaker 1: Why haven't you seen any stories from NPR about the 1251 01:04:42,000 --> 01:04:45,200 Speaker 1: New York Post Hunter Biden story? Read more in this newsletter, 1252 01:04:45,320 --> 01:04:48,320 Speaker 1: here's the quote. We don't want to waste our time 1253 01:04:48,560 --> 01:04:52,080 Speaker 1: on stories that are not really stories. We don't want 1254 01:04:52,120 --> 01:04:55,640 Speaker 1: to waste the listeners and readers' time on stories that 1255 01:04:55,720 --> 01:04:59,600 Speaker 1: are just pure distractions. So how can the Biden administration 1256 01:04:59,680 --> 01:05:02,560 Speaker 1: claim with a straight face that they have faced tough 1257 01:05:02,640 --> 01:05:06,360 Speaker 1: questions from NPR when they were the most forward and 1258 01:05:07,080 --> 01:05:11,160 Speaker 1: out there really in leading the campaign to discredit the 1259 01:05:11,240 --> 01:05:15,800 Speaker 1: Hunter Biden laptop story. Like your joke, you're not actually independent, 1260 01:05:15,880 --> 01:05:19,360 Speaker 1: you are one hundred percent actually state affiliated media with 1261 01:05:19,480 --> 01:05:23,000 Speaker 1: an obvious bias. And as you said, Crystal, you know what, 1262 01:05:23,320 --> 01:05:25,640 Speaker 1: it's just a joke that we all pretend that VOA, 1263 01:05:25,920 --> 01:05:30,520 Speaker 1: Radio Free Europe and BBC also aren't. Yeah, they are good, 1264 01:05:30,600 --> 01:05:32,880 Speaker 1: you know, put I guess just put the labels on 1265 01:05:32,960 --> 01:05:35,880 Speaker 1: all of them. Yeah, just be consistent. I mean again, 1266 01:05:35,920 --> 01:05:39,960 Speaker 1: this isn't consistent. The problem for NPR is actually not 1267 01:05:40,080 --> 01:05:42,720 Speaker 1: that they receive funding from the government, because it's not 1268 01:05:42,760 --> 01:05:45,840 Speaker 1: like their ideological disposition changed during the Trump years when 1269 01:05:45,840 --> 01:05:48,800 Speaker 1: they were getting funding from the Trump administration. Right, their 1270 01:05:48,840 --> 01:05:53,800 Speaker 1: issue is the same issue that CNN has that MSNBC has, 1271 01:05:53,880 --> 01:05:59,160 Speaker 1: which is the sort of ideological capture really by their 1272 01:05:59,280 --> 01:06:05,200 Speaker 1: audience base where they rather than really doing independent fact 1273 01:06:05,240 --> 01:06:07,920 Speaker 1: finding or really surfacing stories that are stories in their 1274 01:06:07,920 --> 01:06:15,040 Speaker 1: own words, they're serving their audience, which is overwhelmingly like affluent, liberal, 1275 01:06:16,080 --> 01:06:20,000 Speaker 1: educated liberals, and so they are putting out the content 1276 01:06:20,320 --> 01:06:24,040 Speaker 1: through the ideological lens that serves that audience base. Same 1277 01:06:24,040 --> 01:06:26,560 Speaker 1: thing New York Times is doing, same thing, CNN is doing, 1278 01:06:26,680 --> 01:06:31,120 Speaker 1: same thing MSNBC is doing. So yes, they get funding 1279 01:06:31,120 --> 01:06:33,360 Speaker 1: from the government, but the real issue with them in 1280 01:06:33,440 --> 01:06:36,320 Speaker 1: terms of any you know, their reporting failures in particular 1281 01:06:36,360 --> 01:06:39,080 Speaker 1: on the Hunter Biden issue, is more about sort of 1282 01:06:39,160 --> 01:06:43,680 Speaker 1: ideological audience capture and playing to what where they see 1283 01:06:43,720 --> 01:06:48,400 Speaker 1: their primary revenue coming from their you know, ideologically not 1284 01:06:48,600 --> 01:06:51,840 Speaker 1: diverse base. That's where I think they get into trouble 1285 01:06:51,840 --> 01:06:54,120 Speaker 1: in the same way as many other news organizations. I 1286 01:06:54,120 --> 01:06:56,760 Speaker 1: think you're correct. The entire thing just reveals like how 1287 01:06:56,880 --> 01:07:01,320 Speaker 1: much of a farce really that they handle themselves. And yeah, look, 1288 01:07:01,360 --> 01:07:04,040 Speaker 1: the freak out is delicious, It's enjoyable and to the 1289 01:07:04,080 --> 01:07:06,200 Speaker 1: extent that I'm enjoying the chaos, even though my own 1290 01:07:06,200 --> 01:07:09,520 Speaker 1: personal Twitter experience has become far worse. This is definitely 1291 01:07:09,560 --> 01:07:14,840 Speaker 1: why Yeah, for sure. Speaking of other liberal media outlets 1292 01:07:14,840 --> 01:07:18,520 Speaker 1: with issues we have covered here, you know Don Lemon's 1293 01:07:18,560 --> 01:07:21,280 Speaker 1: comments about you know, when women are in their prime 1294 01:07:22,000 --> 01:07:27,120 Speaker 1: and the obvious hatred that his female co hosts have 1295 01:07:27,280 --> 01:07:30,920 Speaker 1: for him on their new failing morning show. Variety has 1296 01:07:30,960 --> 01:07:34,640 Speaker 1: a new in depth report about a long track record 1297 01:07:34,800 --> 01:07:39,280 Speaker 1: of alleged behavior from mister Lemon within the network that 1298 01:07:39,440 --> 01:07:43,960 Speaker 1: has been really, according to their reporting, again quite outrageous. 1299 01:07:44,160 --> 01:07:47,080 Speaker 1: I mean some of the cat shit it's psychotic. That 1300 01:07:47,160 --> 01:07:51,080 Speaker 1: he is used to bully and intimidate his colleagues across 1301 01:07:51,120 --> 01:07:54,440 Speaker 1: the board is quite disturbing. Let's go on and put 1302 01:07:54,440 --> 01:07:56,640 Speaker 1: this up on the screen. Daily Beast had a write 1303 01:07:56,680 --> 01:08:01,200 Speaker 1: up of the reporting that again originated in a Variety. 1304 01:08:01,280 --> 01:08:04,240 Speaker 1: The headline here is Don Lemon's history of alleged misogyny 1305 01:08:04,280 --> 01:08:08,840 Speaker 1: and diva like behavior detailed in a new report. I 1306 01:08:08,920 --> 01:08:13,160 Speaker 1: will give you some of the low lights here. One 1307 01:08:13,280 --> 01:08:16,240 Speaker 1: in particular is he was upset that one of his 1308 01:08:16,320 --> 01:08:18,479 Speaker 1: colleagues I think got sent to a rock had like 1309 01:08:18,520 --> 01:08:21,400 Speaker 1: some you know plum prominent position. This was back a while, 1310 01:08:21,479 --> 01:08:24,479 Speaker 1: It was like two thousand and eight. He got a 1311 01:08:24,520 --> 01:08:30,680 Speaker 1: burner phone and started sending this colleague these threatening messages 1312 01:08:31,080 --> 01:08:34,280 Speaker 1: through the burner phone, things like now you've crossed the 1313 01:08:34,320 --> 01:08:38,559 Speaker 1: line and you're going to pay for it. CNN did 1314 01:08:38,720 --> 01:08:44,040 Speaker 1: an internal human resources investigation and they traced those texts 1315 01:08:44,479 --> 01:08:50,280 Speaker 1: back to Don Lemon. Now, in any sane workplace, that 1316 01:08:50,479 --> 01:08:54,719 Speaker 1: sort of like truly psychotic behavior would certainly get you fired. 1317 01:08:55,080 --> 01:08:57,439 Speaker 1: But not for Don Lemon. He was pulled from his 1318 01:08:57,520 --> 01:09:01,439 Speaker 1: co anchor duties with this female. He was just moved 1319 01:09:01,439 --> 01:09:05,120 Speaker 1: to the weekends, so push to the weekends. Demoted, but 1320 01:09:05,479 --> 01:09:09,280 Speaker 1: not removed from the organization. They also say that those 1321 01:09:09,280 --> 01:09:11,639 Speaker 1: who worked with him say he was a quote shameless 1322 01:09:11,680 --> 01:09:15,400 Speaker 1: name dropper, left behind hints that he socialized with important people, 1323 01:09:15,479 --> 01:09:18,800 Speaker 1: like a handwritten note from Stedman Graham that he had 1324 01:09:18,840 --> 01:09:22,120 Speaker 1: taped on his computer. Some were also unnerved by his 1325 01:09:22,200 --> 01:09:25,400 Speaker 1: talk of previous lawsuits, believing it signaled he was litigious. 1326 01:09:25,680 --> 01:09:29,400 Speaker 1: He frequently let drop that he successfully sued Tower Records 1327 01:09:29,439 --> 01:09:32,720 Speaker 1: as well as the Chicago PD for racial profiling and 1328 01:09:32,760 --> 01:09:35,560 Speaker 1: didn't need to worry about money thanks to the settlements 1329 01:09:36,000 --> 01:09:38,760 Speaker 1: called one of his producers fat to her face. He 1330 01:09:38,800 --> 01:09:43,080 Speaker 1: mocked Nancy Grace on air. He apparently was particularly prickly 1331 01:09:43,320 --> 01:09:48,799 Speaker 1: about any other host getting prominent, any sort of prominent 1332 01:09:48,840 --> 01:09:53,120 Speaker 1: hosting gigs with regard to issues like black American focused issues. 1333 01:09:53,680 --> 01:09:57,640 Speaker 1: So Solo Dad O'Brien landed the gig of hosting CNN's 1334 01:09:57,680 --> 01:10:01,240 Speaker 1: Black in America docu series and ring an editorial call 1335 01:10:01,320 --> 01:10:04,680 Speaker 1: attended by roughly thirty staffers, he suggested O'Brien was not 1336 01:10:04,880 --> 01:10:08,360 Speaker 1: actually black, according to two witnesses, who found the characterization 1337 01:10:08,640 --> 01:10:12,880 Speaker 1: wildly offensive. He made some nasty comments about Si Cub 1338 01:10:12,920 --> 01:10:15,920 Speaker 1: having like mommy brain on air. It just goes on 1339 01:10:16,200 --> 01:10:21,080 Speaker 1: and on with this type of bullying, gross behavior, and 1340 01:10:21,479 --> 01:10:23,599 Speaker 1: you know, and some of it certainly verges on, like 1341 01:10:23,760 --> 01:10:26,760 Speaker 1: you know, sexual harassment. Now, Don Lemon is a gay man, 1342 01:10:27,160 --> 01:10:30,439 Speaker 1: so this really isn't about sex in any way. It's 1343 01:10:30,600 --> 01:10:34,080 Speaker 1: just about power with these sorts of comments and behavior 1344 01:10:34,479 --> 01:10:38,000 Speaker 1: from these individuals who think they are above it all 1345 01:10:38,120 --> 01:10:40,840 Speaker 1: and won't face any consequences, which by the way, he 1346 01:10:40,920 --> 01:10:43,479 Speaker 1: has not. They do this sort of stuff just to 1347 01:10:43,560 --> 01:10:45,639 Speaker 1: prove to you that they can and that they can 1348 01:10:45,680 --> 01:10:48,679 Speaker 1: get away with it, and that you're smaller than them 1349 01:10:48,920 --> 01:10:51,280 Speaker 1: and you just have to take whatever they're going to 1350 01:10:51,320 --> 01:10:53,680 Speaker 1: dish out. And that, to me is the pattern of behavior. Well, 1351 01:10:53,680 --> 01:10:55,200 Speaker 1: that really shows us. That's what they did. I mean, 1352 01:10:55,240 --> 01:10:57,280 Speaker 1: they elevated him over and over again. He's only been 1353 01:10:57,280 --> 01:10:59,599 Speaker 1: promoted and maybe made one of the major force faces 1354 01:10:59,600 --> 01:11:01,160 Speaker 1: in the network. And to your point about the whole 1355 01:11:01,200 --> 01:11:03,240 Speaker 1: power dynamic, they literally had a rule that you're not 1356 01:11:03,280 --> 01:11:05,639 Speaker 1: allowed to date anybody in the office, and he started 1357 01:11:05,720 --> 01:11:08,400 Speaker 1: dating one of his producers who was twenty years his junior, 1358 01:11:08,400 --> 01:11:10,720 Speaker 1: literally showing up at the office and riding to the 1359 01:11:10,760 --> 01:11:13,120 Speaker 1: car in the same time just to show everyone that 1360 01:11:13,160 --> 01:11:15,080 Speaker 1: he's like, the rules don't apply to me. He would 1361 01:11:15,160 --> 01:11:18,240 Speaker 1: flaunt it in front of everyone. The text though, that's 1362 01:11:18,240 --> 01:11:20,240 Speaker 1: got to be one of the craziest things I've ever heard, right, 1363 01:11:20,439 --> 01:11:22,280 Speaker 1: like you go and you buy. This was also fifteen 1364 01:11:22,320 --> 01:11:24,360 Speaker 1: years ago, so remember guys, like, it's not like that 1365 01:11:24,479 --> 01:11:27,559 Speaker 1: easy to just go get There were no apps at 1366 01:11:27,560 --> 01:11:29,360 Speaker 1: that time that you could just download a number or 1367 01:11:29,400 --> 01:11:31,840 Speaker 1: whatever for a fake day. You had to go to 1368 01:11:31,880 --> 01:11:33,559 Speaker 1: a store on phone. You had to go to like 1369 01:11:33,600 --> 01:11:35,759 Speaker 1: a seven to eleven. You had to buy a burner 1370 01:11:35,800 --> 01:11:38,200 Speaker 1: phone that like drug dealers use. You had to get 1371 01:11:38,200 --> 01:11:40,400 Speaker 1: a card, you had to set this thing up, you 1372 01:11:40,439 --> 01:11:42,400 Speaker 1: had to put her phone number in, and then you 1373 01:11:42,439 --> 01:11:45,840 Speaker 1: had to text from that phone to that person that 1374 01:11:46,160 --> 01:11:51,360 Speaker 1: is strown cold crazy like what is going And then 1375 01:11:51,560 --> 01:11:53,920 Speaker 1: they do an investigation apparently so dumb that he's able 1376 01:11:53,920 --> 01:11:55,639 Speaker 1: to trace it back to him too, the only guy 1377 01:11:55,640 --> 01:11:58,520 Speaker 1: who've ever had a burner phone. Fair dumb they and 1378 01:11:58,560 --> 01:12:00,679 Speaker 1: they're like, yeah, it was you, and then they don't 1379 01:12:00,680 --> 01:12:03,439 Speaker 1: do a damn thing about it. This moves of the weekends. 1380 01:12:03,479 --> 01:12:06,679 Speaker 1: It's totally crazy, like the way that he behaves. As 1381 01:12:06,720 --> 01:12:10,280 Speaker 1: you said, he's obvious like one of the most narcissistic 1382 01:12:10,320 --> 01:12:15,760 Speaker 1: individuals on all of television. And it's an indictment for 1383 01:12:15,880 --> 01:12:18,559 Speaker 1: all of the preening and you know liberal me too 1384 01:12:18,640 --> 01:12:21,240 Speaker 1: covers that they claim to stand for over there. This 1385 01:12:21,280 --> 01:12:24,000 Speaker 1: guy obviously should have been fired over fifteen sixteen years. 1386 01:12:24,160 --> 01:12:26,360 Speaker 1: Think of how demoralizing this far. Yeah, oh it must 1387 01:12:26,400 --> 01:12:28,280 Speaker 1: be tough one. I can't imagine everyone who has to 1388 01:12:28,280 --> 01:12:30,960 Speaker 1: come in contact, right And by the way, whenever you 1389 01:12:31,000 --> 01:12:35,040 Speaker 1: see these sort of stories uppear, which clearly they add 1390 01:12:35,080 --> 01:12:37,920 Speaker 1: a number of sources for and tons of stories going 1391 01:12:38,000 --> 01:12:41,000 Speaker 1: back years, it is once again a sign that everyone 1392 01:12:41,160 --> 01:12:44,320 Speaker 1: who has to work with you hates your guts and 1393 01:12:44,360 --> 01:12:47,240 Speaker 1: they are looking for any chance that they have to 1394 01:12:47,320 --> 01:12:50,160 Speaker 1: try to stick the knife in. I was reminded of 1395 01:12:50,240 --> 01:12:53,080 Speaker 1: the shitty men and media list, of course was like 1396 01:12:53,160 --> 01:12:55,680 Speaker 1: slanderous and you know, and recently actually they just had 1397 01:12:55,720 --> 01:12:57,880 Speaker 1: to settle that case, right, Yeah, But the reason it 1398 01:12:57,920 --> 01:13:00,559 Speaker 1: took off is because there are a lot of truth 1399 01:13:00,920 --> 01:13:03,720 Speaker 1: to the number of I wouldn't say just shitty men, 1400 01:13:03,760 --> 01:13:07,000 Speaker 1: but shitty people in media who rise to the top 1401 01:13:07,439 --> 01:13:11,320 Speaker 1: not because they're talented, not because it's some like meritocracy 1402 01:13:11,400 --> 01:13:17,080 Speaker 1: or whatever, but because of the gross tactics, psychopathic behavior, 1403 01:13:17,520 --> 01:13:21,439 Speaker 1: bullying power games that they are willing to play and 1404 01:13:21,520 --> 01:13:23,479 Speaker 1: know how to play. That's how a lot of these 1405 01:13:23,520 --> 01:13:27,000 Speaker 1: people rise to the top. And that was what really 1406 01:13:27,040 --> 01:13:31,080 Speaker 1: came out for me from reading this piece. And you know, 1407 01:13:31,200 --> 01:13:33,720 Speaker 1: by the way, I know some people at CNN and 1408 01:13:33,840 --> 01:13:36,880 Speaker 1: who confirmed much of this, you know to me privately 1409 01:13:37,040 --> 01:13:40,040 Speaker 1: that oh yeah, this is exactly how he's known as 1410 01:13:40,120 --> 01:13:46,240 Speaker 1: this bullying, abrasive diva who you know thinks that he's 1411 01:13:46,320 --> 01:13:50,080 Speaker 1: completely untouchable and has been right about that. By the way, Yeah, no, 1412 01:13:50,240 --> 01:13:52,240 Speaker 1: I mean, look, it's crazy. I feel bad for anybody 1413 01:13:52,240 --> 01:13:53,960 Speaker 1: who has to work with him, although I don't have 1414 01:13:53,960 --> 01:13:55,880 Speaker 1: too much simply because they actually signed up for it 1415 01:13:55,920 --> 01:13:59,280 Speaker 1: and everybody knows that he's a monster, low level like producers, 1416 01:14:00,000 --> 01:14:01,600 Speaker 1: they shut to get their foot in the door, and 1417 01:14:01,640 --> 01:14:04,559 Speaker 1: they're subjected to this like psychode. That must be really 1418 01:14:04,600 --> 01:14:07,679 Speaker 1: tough working with somebody like that. I genuinely can't imagine. 1419 01:14:07,680 --> 01:14:09,479 Speaker 1: So thoughts and prayers for anybody who has to come 1420 01:14:09,479 --> 01:14:14,320 Speaker 1: into contact with Indeed, Crystal, what do you take a 1421 01:14:14,320 --> 01:14:17,160 Speaker 1: look at? Well? On January sixth, a Proud Boy member 1422 01:14:17,240 --> 01:14:20,160 Speaker 1: named Erin pushed his way towards the Capitol, reaching a 1423 01:14:20,160 --> 01:14:22,760 Speaker 1: barricade and holding it open for other rioters to more 1424 01:14:22,800 --> 01:14:26,080 Speaker 1: easily enter the building. At some point, however, he paused 1425 01:14:26,120 --> 01:14:29,680 Speaker 1: and sent the following message to his FBI handler quote 1426 01:14:30,080 --> 01:14:33,720 Speaker 1: barriers down at Capitol Building. Crowd surged forward about to 1427 01:14:33,720 --> 01:14:36,599 Speaker 1: reach the building. Now Proud Boys did not do it 1428 01:14:36,720 --> 01:14:40,240 Speaker 1: nor inspire now. Erin is one of quite a number 1429 01:14:40,280 --> 01:14:42,840 Speaker 1: of FBI informants who we now know we're working inside 1430 01:14:42,840 --> 01:14:44,799 Speaker 1: the right wing groups that have been charged with seditious 1431 01:14:44,800 --> 01:14:49,000 Speaker 1: conspiracy in connection with those January six attacks. The FBI 1432 01:14:49,080 --> 01:14:52,519 Speaker 1: had men inside the Proud Boys and inside the oath keepers. 1433 01:14:52,760 --> 01:14:55,120 Speaker 1: The founder of the Proud Voice himself had been a 1434 01:14:55,160 --> 01:14:58,280 Speaker 1: FED informant. So if the FBI had paid informants with 1435 01:14:58,320 --> 01:15:01,400 Speaker 1: a front row seat to January sixth, plotting, how the 1436 01:15:01,439 --> 01:15:04,800 Speaker 1: hell did law enforcement fail so dramatically on that day, 1437 01:15:04,880 --> 01:15:06,720 Speaker 1: caught seemingly with their pants down as a bunch of 1438 01:15:06,760 --> 01:15:09,439 Speaker 1: Mega and q Andon nut jobs storm the Capitol. Now, 1439 01:15:09,520 --> 01:15:12,439 Speaker 1: right wing commentators have suggested this wasn't actually a failure, 1440 01:15:12,439 --> 01:15:14,240 Speaker 1: but rather a plot by the deep state to make 1441 01:15:14,240 --> 01:15:17,160 Speaker 1: Trump supporters look bad. The new evidence that has emerged 1442 01:15:17,160 --> 01:15:20,320 Speaker 1: as part of the Proud Boys Proud Boy's trial reveals 1443 01:15:20,360 --> 01:15:23,640 Speaker 1: a much simpler explanation. Law enforcement failed to disrupt the 1444 01:15:23,640 --> 01:15:26,040 Speaker 1: attack or secure the capital due to run of the 1445 01:15:26,080 --> 01:15:30,120 Speaker 1: mill human failings of incompetence and ideological blindness, fueled by 1446 01:15:30,160 --> 01:15:33,240 Speaker 1: a Trump administration that was obsessed with Antifa and other 1447 01:15:33,320 --> 01:15:36,599 Speaker 1: left wing groups. Now, Aaron and every other FBI informant 1448 01:15:36,640 --> 01:15:38,639 Speaker 1: associated with the Proud Boys, and there were a lot 1449 01:15:38,680 --> 01:15:41,760 Speaker 1: of them, tell basically the same story. The FEDS had 1450 01:15:41,800 --> 01:15:44,960 Speaker 1: actually no interest in the Proud Boys, only in their 1451 01:15:45,040 --> 01:15:48,639 Speaker 1: left wing nemesis and Tifa. Courting the Washington Post quote, 1452 01:15:48,720 --> 01:15:51,160 Speaker 1: the evidence shown in court indicates that many of the 1453 01:15:51,240 --> 01:15:54,519 Speaker 1: FBI sources inside the Proud Boys were asked only about 1454 01:15:54,520 --> 01:15:58,000 Speaker 1: their ideological opponents on the left, even as that right 1455 01:15:58,040 --> 01:16:00,839 Speaker 1: wing group was implicated in threats and violce at protests 1456 01:16:00,840 --> 01:16:04,840 Speaker 1: across the United States. Aaron himself testified that before January six, 1457 01:16:05,200 --> 01:16:07,800 Speaker 1: the FBI never asked him to look for information about 1458 01:16:07,840 --> 01:16:09,920 Speaker 1: the Proud Boys. When he informed his handler he was 1459 01:16:10,000 --> 01:16:12,880 Speaker 1: going to DC for the protest, he was asked only 1460 01:16:12,920 --> 01:16:15,120 Speaker 1: to try to see if I could locate someone in 1461 01:16:15,200 --> 01:16:17,559 Speaker 1: DC that had nothing to do with the Proud Boys, 1462 01:16:17,600 --> 01:16:20,320 Speaker 1: he testified. So, even as he is telling the FEDS 1463 01:16:20,360 --> 01:16:23,360 Speaker 1: he's going to DC for January six protests, his FED 1464 01:16:23,360 --> 01:16:26,479 Speaker 1: handlers are not remotely curious about what the Proud Boys 1465 01:16:26,600 --> 01:16:29,200 Speaker 1: might be planning there. It appears the FEDS didn't ask 1466 01:16:29,320 --> 01:16:31,760 Speaker 1: any of their Proud Boys informants for Proud Boys Info 1467 01:16:32,120 --> 01:16:34,880 Speaker 1: founder in Rique Tario was a FED informant on a 1468 01:16:34,880 --> 01:16:37,360 Speaker 1: healthcare fraud case a while back, and continue to engage 1469 01:16:37,400 --> 01:16:40,360 Speaker 1: the agency in the years to come. Another defendant, Joseph Biggs, 1470 01:16:40,360 --> 01:16:43,519 Speaker 1: admitted he had also been an FBI informant providing information 1471 01:16:43,600 --> 01:16:47,400 Speaker 1: on quote Antifa networks, another right wing activist Jenny Lynn 1472 01:16:47,439 --> 01:16:50,840 Speaker 1: Salinus was revealed to be a government informant just before 1473 01:16:50,840 --> 01:16:53,719 Speaker 1: taking the stand to defend Proud Boys founder in rikue Tario. 1474 01:16:54,160 --> 01:16:56,160 Speaker 1: She was so cozy with the group that she was 1475 01:16:56,160 --> 01:16:59,960 Speaker 1: providing extensive advice for Proudboys members legal defense, unbeknownst to 1476 01:17:00,120 --> 01:17:04,400 Speaker 1: her FBI handlers. Similar to the others, Szalinas reportedly swore 1477 01:17:04,520 --> 01:17:06,640 Speaker 1: under oath that she was only providing info to the 1478 01:17:06,640 --> 01:17:10,000 Speaker 1: government on Antifa and the border, not on the members 1479 01:17:10,000 --> 01:17:12,840 Speaker 1: of the violent group that she was apparently deeply enmeshed with. 1480 01:17:13,280 --> 01:17:15,960 Speaker 1: As the judge explained quote, she wasn't tasked with reporting 1481 01:17:16,000 --> 01:17:18,320 Speaker 1: on Proud Boys. Her contacts with the defense camp are 1482 01:17:18,320 --> 01:17:22,160 Speaker 1: easily explained by her sympathy for the defendants. Another FED 1483 01:17:22,200 --> 01:17:25,800 Speaker 1: informant was actually at a heavily screwtinized parking lot meeting 1484 01:17:25,840 --> 01:17:29,360 Speaker 1: between Prodboy's leader Tarrio and Oath Keeper's leader Stuart Rhodes 1485 01:17:29,439 --> 01:17:33,160 Speaker 1: on the day before January sixth, So the FEDS literally 1486 01:17:33,160 --> 01:17:35,639 Speaker 1: had a guy at what they contend was a key 1487 01:17:35,760 --> 01:17:39,599 Speaker 1: meaning the day before the attacks. Still nothing, no action. 1488 01:17:40,120 --> 01:17:43,880 Speaker 1: Now that particular informant was able to avoid testifying because 1489 01:17:43,880 --> 01:17:47,160 Speaker 1: of fears of incriminating himself. The whole situation was really 1490 01:17:47,160 --> 01:17:49,719 Speaker 1: summed up quite well by yet another Proud Boy informant 1491 01:17:49,760 --> 01:17:51,599 Speaker 1: who said that quote they didn't want to know about 1492 01:17:51,600 --> 01:17:54,360 Speaker 1: the Proud Boys, they wanted to know about Antifa. With 1493 01:17:54,400 --> 01:17:57,160 Speaker 1: regards to January six he indicated that the FEDS were 1494 01:17:57,360 --> 01:17:59,840 Speaker 1: radio silent, apart from asking in advance whether he was 1495 01:17:59,840 --> 01:18:03,240 Speaker 1: going and afterwards whether he committed any crimes. This fits 1496 01:18:03,240 --> 01:18:05,599 Speaker 1: with the picture of law enforcement failure that has emerged 1497 01:18:05,640 --> 01:18:08,120 Speaker 1: since January sixth, because while the FBI may not have 1498 01:18:08,160 --> 01:18:10,080 Speaker 1: been getting tips when there are Proud Boy sources who 1499 01:18:10,080 --> 01:18:12,680 Speaker 1: were only focused on a mostly fictional Antifa, they were 1500 01:18:12,680 --> 01:18:17,160 Speaker 1: getting hundreds of other tips from a variety of sources 1501 01:18:17,240 --> 01:18:20,599 Speaker 1: around the country. Among those many tips was actually an 1502 01:18:20,600 --> 01:18:23,240 Speaker 1: Oathkeeper member who was so alarmed by the group's increasingly 1503 01:18:23,320 --> 01:18:26,559 Speaker 1: violent rhetoric he secretly recorded a meeting provided to the FBI. 1504 01:18:27,120 --> 01:18:30,880 Speaker 1: Once again, FBI took no action on this or any 1505 01:18:30,960 --> 01:18:34,400 Speaker 1: other tip until after the fact, failing to disrupt the 1506 01:18:34,439 --> 01:18:38,280 Speaker 1: activities in advance, failing alongside every other law enforcement agency 1507 01:18:38,280 --> 01:18:41,760 Speaker 1: to provide adequate security on the day of the attacks. 1508 01:18:42,000 --> 01:18:46,080 Speaker 1: Their own ideological biases, combined with the Trump administration's obsession 1509 01:18:46,120 --> 01:18:49,240 Speaker 1: with the Antifa blinded them to the possibility of violence 1510 01:18:49,280 --> 01:18:52,200 Speaker 1: that was literally right in front of them. So if 1511 01:18:52,200 --> 01:18:54,960 Speaker 1: they weren't disrupting actual plots being hashed red under their 1512 01:18:55,000 --> 01:18:58,320 Speaker 1: noses with help from their own informants, what were they 1513 01:18:58,400 --> 01:19:02,719 Speaker 1: actually Doingjournalist Trevor Aronson of The Alphabet Boys podcast provides 1514 01:19:02,840 --> 01:19:05,719 Speaker 1: one answer here, they were apparently using criminals to infiltrate 1515 01:19:05,760 --> 01:19:08,679 Speaker 1: Black Lives Matter protests and an attempt to entrap protest leaders, 1516 01:19:08,920 --> 01:19:12,519 Speaker 1: follment violence and so dissent in those groups. The Gretchen 1517 01:19:12,520 --> 01:19:15,840 Speaker 1: Whitmer kidnapping plot mess provides another answer. They were also 1518 01:19:15,880 --> 01:19:18,439 Speaker 1: apparently helping to hatch high profile plots that they could 1519 01:19:18,439 --> 01:19:20,840 Speaker 1: then swoop in and pretend to disrupt in a way 1520 01:19:20,840 --> 01:19:24,200 Speaker 1: that would be advantageous for a lot of law enforcement careers. 1521 01:19:24,320 --> 01:19:26,880 Speaker 1: Because it's so high profile, it's a lot of work, 1522 01:19:26,920 --> 01:19:30,080 Speaker 1: I guess, to invent kidnapping plots and entrap protesters with 1523 01:19:30,160 --> 01:19:32,679 Speaker 1: low level gun charges. I suppose there just wasn't any 1524 01:19:32,680 --> 01:19:35,919 Speaker 1: time leftover to notice and deal with any actual threats. 1525 01:19:36,400 --> 01:19:39,840 Speaker 1: This whole rotten system has got to be reformed, root 1526 01:19:39,840 --> 01:19:43,439 Speaker 1: and branch. The failures, the blind spots the lawlessness, innocence 1527 01:19:43,439 --> 01:19:46,920 Speaker 1: are entrapped, criminals are paid, fake plots are invented, real 1528 01:19:47,000 --> 01:19:49,639 Speaker 1: plots are ignored. Instead, I guess they'll just get another 1529 01:19:49,680 --> 01:19:52,559 Speaker 1: budget increase to spy more, fail more, and fund even 1530 01:19:52,560 --> 01:19:57,400 Speaker 1: more criminals. It is unreal when you every time, and 1531 01:19:57,439 --> 01:20:00,000 Speaker 1: if you want to hear my reaction to Crystal's monologue, 1532 01:20:00,120 --> 01:20:06,880 Speaker 1: become a premium subscriber today at breakingpoints dot com. All right, sorry, 1533 01:20:06,920 --> 01:20:09,080 Speaker 1: were you looking at it? Well? The story of American 1534 01:20:09,120 --> 01:20:11,960 Speaker 1: internal migration patterns after World War II has actually been 1535 01:20:12,000 --> 01:20:14,519 Speaker 1: pretty basic. We used to be a rural country, especially 1536 01:20:14,560 --> 01:20:17,880 Speaker 1: before the Great Depression. Industrialization, the loss of family farming, 1537 01:20:17,920 --> 01:20:20,120 Speaker 1: the call to arms for World War Two, the development 1538 01:20:20,120 --> 01:20:22,479 Speaker 1: of full blown market economy pushed us away from all 1539 01:20:22,520 --> 01:20:26,200 Speaker 1: of that. Americans moved only two direction, towards the rural areas, 1540 01:20:26,360 --> 01:20:29,240 Speaker 1: and they fulfilled the dreams of our forefathers by going west. 1541 01:20:29,479 --> 01:20:33,360 Speaker 1: Concentration was everything. Black Americans were haunted by the legacy 1542 01:20:33,360 --> 01:20:36,559 Speaker 1: of Jim Crow and the promise of industrialization up north, 1543 01:20:36,880 --> 01:20:40,040 Speaker 1: moved in great numbers from nineteen ten to nineteen seventy. 1544 01:20:40,040 --> 01:20:41,960 Speaker 1: It was actually called the Great Migration at the time. 1545 01:20:42,200 --> 01:20:45,200 Speaker 1: Remains one of the most significant internal migration patterns in 1546 01:20:45,240 --> 01:20:49,080 Speaker 1: American history. After that, though, the trends basically normalized. White 1547 01:20:49,080 --> 01:20:52,080 Speaker 1: and Black Americans were concentrated around cities, be it in 1548 01:20:52,120 --> 01:20:54,840 Speaker 1: the Northeast, the Midwest, or the West. The city was 1549 01:20:54,880 --> 01:20:57,879 Speaker 1: the nexus of capital, of offices, and of leisure activity. 1550 01:20:58,160 --> 01:21:02,360 Speaker 1: Internal migration patterns suggested Americans were moving towards cities to 1551 01:21:02,439 --> 01:21:04,920 Speaker 1: either live within them or live near them in a 1552 01:21:05,040 --> 01:21:08,479 Speaker 1: suburb or an exurb. The trend almost never reversed and 1553 01:21:08,600 --> 01:21:11,479 Speaker 1: was bolstered by the housing boom floated by cheap credit 1554 01:21:11,560 --> 01:21:14,280 Speaker 1: up until two thousand and eight. Even with the wipeout 1555 01:21:14,320 --> 01:21:16,519 Speaker 1: of American household wealth in two thousand and eight, the 1556 01:21:16,560 --> 01:21:19,680 Speaker 1: trend didn't really reverse, and if anything, before the pandemic, 1557 01:21:19,880 --> 01:21:24,320 Speaker 1: city life remained a major attraction for dynamism, job opportunity, 1558 01:21:24,360 --> 01:21:27,160 Speaker 1: and quality of life for the upwardly mobile. But then 1559 01:21:27,400 --> 01:21:32,000 Speaker 1: the pandemic struck, something absolutely crazy happened. People said, you 1560 01:21:32,000 --> 01:21:34,200 Speaker 1: know what, I think, I'm going to buck nearly a 1561 01:21:34,280 --> 01:21:38,280 Speaker 1: century of American internal migration history and move the other way. 1562 01:21:38,520 --> 01:21:40,719 Speaker 1: The Census Bureau is out with some stunning new data 1563 01:21:40,800 --> 01:21:44,400 Speaker 1: highlighting two straight years of massive change in American migration. 1564 01:21:44,479 --> 01:21:48,040 Speaker 1: Trends in twenty nineteen. Before the pandemic, smaller counties with 1565 01:21:48,040 --> 01:21:51,400 Speaker 1: fewer than thirty thousand people actually lost population. However, during 1566 01:21:51,400 --> 01:21:53,360 Speaker 1: the peak of the pandemic between twenty twenty and twenty 1567 01:21:53,400 --> 01:21:57,320 Speaker 1: twenty one, it flipped entirely. The least populous counties actually 1568 01:21:57,400 --> 01:21:59,599 Speaker 1: gained people for the first time in a long time. 1569 01:21:59,720 --> 01:22:02,840 Speaker 1: While this trends slowed, that life into rural areas is 1570 01:22:02,880 --> 01:22:06,559 Speaker 1: still going up today with internal migration flows going positive. 1571 01:22:06,840 --> 01:22:10,240 Speaker 1: Even more interesting, the largest counties with populations of one 1572 01:22:10,280 --> 01:22:13,880 Speaker 1: million or more. We're losing people through domestic migration before 1573 01:22:13,920 --> 01:22:17,800 Speaker 1: the pandemic at a slow rate, but the outflow exploded 1574 01:22:17,920 --> 01:22:20,840 Speaker 1: post pandemic. This is the major story that so many 1575 01:22:20,840 --> 01:22:24,040 Speaker 1: people are missing right now. The South is booming in 1576 01:22:24,080 --> 01:22:27,320 Speaker 1: a reversal of nearly one hundred years of history. Take 1577 01:22:27,360 --> 01:22:28,960 Speaker 1: a look at the map in front of you. The 1578 01:22:29,000 --> 01:22:31,719 Speaker 1: burnt orange areas of the map are those which saw 1579 01:22:31,800 --> 01:22:34,960 Speaker 1: the highest levels of domestic migration in the last year. 1580 01:22:35,320 --> 01:22:38,040 Speaker 1: What emerges is not just Texas and Florida, which are 1581 01:22:38,120 --> 01:22:41,479 Speaker 1: certainly doing well, but a huge concentration in the suburban 1582 01:22:41,520 --> 01:22:44,080 Speaker 1: American South. Zoom out of the South and you also 1583 01:22:44,120 --> 01:22:49,720 Speaker 1: see a major outflow from California all across Idaho, Arizona, Colorado, 1584 01:22:49,880 --> 01:22:54,599 Speaker 1: and even midwestern concentration places like Arkansas and Missouri. Take 1585 01:22:54,640 --> 01:22:56,400 Speaker 1: states out of it, though, and you look at it 1586 01:22:56,400 --> 01:22:59,919 Speaker 1: in terms of urban, suburban, and exurban, it's even more interesting. 1587 01:23:00,240 --> 01:23:04,080 Speaker 1: Across the entire country. People are leaving the urban core 1588 01:23:04,400 --> 01:23:07,439 Speaker 1: for the suburbs. Even in Florida, which is doing very well, 1589 01:23:07,640 --> 01:23:11,120 Speaker 1: Miami Dade County is actually losing residents who are moving 1590 01:23:11,160 --> 01:23:13,759 Speaker 1: to more affordable parts of the state. Look at Texas, 1591 01:23:13,840 --> 01:23:16,559 Speaker 1: same story. People left the urban core of Houston and 1592 01:23:16,640 --> 01:23:19,280 Speaker 1: of Dallas for the suburban areas, and the northeast trends 1593 01:23:19,320 --> 01:23:22,320 Speaker 1: actually are exactly the same. People are abandoning in droves 1594 01:23:22,360 --> 01:23:25,320 Speaker 1: New York City, Washington, d C, Boston, not just to 1595 01:23:25,360 --> 01:23:28,240 Speaker 1: move to other states, but to move to other areas 1596 01:23:28,400 --> 01:23:33,840 Speaker 1: nearby Chicago, Denver, Seattle, Portland, same case nationwide trend. It's 1597 01:23:33,880 --> 01:23:37,559 Speaker 1: accelerating year after year, and it shows no signs of stopping. 1598 01:23:37,800 --> 01:23:40,280 Speaker 1: It will change the face of America and of our 1599 01:23:40,320 --> 01:23:42,960 Speaker 1: culture as we know it. Our pop culture and news 1600 01:23:43,000 --> 01:23:46,840 Speaker 1: still exists in a nineteen eighties mindset where New York City, Boston, Washington, 1601 01:23:46,880 --> 01:23:49,559 Speaker 1: d C, Los Angeles and San Francisco ruled the world, 1602 01:23:49,680 --> 01:23:51,760 Speaker 1: and for a long time they were the engines of 1603 01:23:51,800 --> 01:23:54,439 Speaker 1: economic growth, of power, and the tastes of upper middle 1604 01:23:54,439 --> 01:23:57,880 Speaker 1: class professionals. Still they reflect that. But compare it though, 1605 01:23:57,920 --> 01:24:01,280 Speaker 1: to today places where actual am Americans are moving, It 1606 01:24:01,280 --> 01:24:04,040 Speaker 1: couldn't be more different. The top ten metro areas which 1607 01:24:04,080 --> 01:24:14,400 Speaker 1: gained population twenty twenty twenty twenty two are as follows Dallas, Texas, Houston, Texas, Phoenix, Arizona, Austin, Texas, Atlanta, Georgia, Tampa, Florida, Charlotte, 1608 01:24:14,400 --> 01:24:19,240 Speaker 1: North Carolina, San Antonio, Texas, Orlando, Florida, and Raleigh, North Carolina. 1609 01:24:19,880 --> 01:24:22,640 Speaker 1: You notice a trend there. We are becoming more and 1610 01:24:22,720 --> 01:24:26,120 Speaker 1: more spread out as a country and actually less geographically concentrated. 1611 01:24:26,320 --> 01:24:29,280 Speaker 1: The availability of high speed internet across the United States 1612 01:24:29,400 --> 01:24:32,520 Speaker 1: a few years ago from now, with technology like Starlink, 1613 01:24:32,720 --> 01:24:37,439 Speaker 1: will only further change everything. The once forgotten places of America, 1614 01:24:37,479 --> 01:24:40,360 Speaker 1: which haven't seen population growth since the mid eighteen thirties, 1615 01:24:40,600 --> 01:24:44,880 Speaker 1: will significantly change in their ability to attract residents. Just 1616 01:24:44,960 --> 01:24:48,479 Speaker 1: think how many massive changes that's going to bring. Georgia 1617 01:24:48,600 --> 01:24:51,519 Speaker 1: already is no longer a red state, It's purple Texas too, 1618 01:24:51,560 --> 01:24:54,400 Speaker 1: seems to be moving in the purple ish direction. Population 1619 01:24:54,479 --> 01:24:57,439 Speaker 1: growth in Arizona and outflows from the Midwest are changing 1620 01:24:57,520 --> 01:25:00,120 Speaker 1: the makeups of political parties. They are changing the way 1621 01:25:00,120 --> 01:25:04,479 Speaker 1: our literal economy functions. The ground is shifting beneath our feet. Now. 1622 01:25:04,479 --> 01:25:06,240 Speaker 1: You can try to fight it, but I don't really 1623 01:25:06,240 --> 01:25:08,200 Speaker 1: think you can. We're in it now and we should 1624 01:25:08,240 --> 01:25:11,280 Speaker 1: embrace it. My major hope and takeaway is this, the 1625 01:25:11,320 --> 01:25:14,400 Speaker 1: center of gravity of culture is just being uprooted right now. 1626 01:25:14,439 --> 01:25:17,160 Speaker 1: It's upwardly mobile people who are moving with their feet. 1627 01:25:17,200 --> 01:25:19,040 Speaker 1: But what makes me really what we really need to 1628 01:25:19,040 --> 01:25:22,519 Speaker 1: do is to make this available to everyone. Choosing a 1629 01:25:22,560 --> 01:25:24,519 Speaker 1: new place to live if you want to is the 1630 01:25:24,600 --> 01:25:27,719 Speaker 1: ultimate expression of the American character and claiming the bounty 1631 01:25:27,720 --> 01:25:30,040 Speaker 1: of beautiful land that we've been blessed with, shaking up 1632 01:25:30,040 --> 01:25:32,800 Speaker 1: the established institutions to create a new order. That's what 1633 01:25:32,880 --> 01:25:35,840 Speaker 1: the benefit is. The added also, though, is that new 1634 01:25:35,960 --> 01:25:38,320 Speaker 1: order with the existing centers of pop culture and power 1635 01:25:38,479 --> 01:25:42,440 Speaker 1: will significantly diminish, and like in the older great migrations, 1636 01:25:42,520 --> 01:25:44,880 Speaker 1: you get to claim a new destiny. I think it's 1637 01:25:44,880 --> 01:25:47,640 Speaker 1: fascinating looking at and if you want to hear my 1638 01:25:47,800 --> 01:25:51,240 Speaker 1: reaction to Sager's monologue become a premium subscriber today at 1639 01:25:51,320 --> 01:25:56,920 Speaker 1: Breakingpoints dot com. As you know if you watched our 1640 01:25:56,960 --> 01:25:59,639 Speaker 1: live stream on Tuesday night, there is a new mayor 1641 01:25:59,640 --> 01:26:03,639 Speaker 1: who has been elected in Chicago and quite an interesting race. 1642 01:26:03,680 --> 01:26:05,320 Speaker 1: So we wanted to get someone who was local, who 1643 01:26:05,320 --> 01:26:07,439 Speaker 1: could really break down the unique dynamics here. So we're 1644 01:26:07,439 --> 01:26:09,680 Speaker 1: excited to be joined by Frank Calabresi. He is a 1645 01:26:09,720 --> 01:26:12,400 Speaker 1: local Chicago political consultant. Great to have you, Frank. Good 1646 01:26:12,439 --> 01:26:15,120 Speaker 1: to see you man, Thanks for having me. Yeah. So, 1647 01:26:15,160 --> 01:26:17,720 Speaker 1: the general dynamics of this race, as I understand them, 1648 01:26:17,720 --> 01:26:20,240 Speaker 1: as you have Paul Vallas, who was backed by the 1649 01:26:20,600 --> 01:26:23,320 Speaker 1: police union and really ran on this like you know, 1650 01:26:23,439 --> 01:26:26,280 Speaker 1: law and order, tough on crime type of posture. And 1651 01:26:26,280 --> 01:26:28,160 Speaker 1: then you had Brandon Johnson, who was a middle school 1652 01:26:28,200 --> 01:26:30,600 Speaker 1: teacher and a labor activist, who was backed by a 1653 01:26:30,600 --> 01:26:34,160 Speaker 1: coalition of lefties backed by Bernie Sanders, and he ends 1654 01:26:34,240 --> 01:26:37,280 Speaker 1: up actually prevailing, which is a break from some of 1655 01:26:37,280 --> 01:26:40,040 Speaker 1: the dynamics we've seen in other cities, in particular New 1656 01:26:40,120 --> 01:26:43,240 Speaker 1: York with the election of Mayor Eric Adams. So just 1657 01:26:43,560 --> 01:26:45,920 Speaker 1: give people a sort of general sense of the race 1658 01:26:46,040 --> 01:26:48,760 Speaker 1: and how Johnson was able to be successful here as 1659 01:26:48,800 --> 01:26:52,040 Speaker 1: a more left wing candidate. So I would compare this 1660 01:26:52,160 --> 01:26:55,160 Speaker 1: race more of the Los Angeles what happened in Los Angeles, 1661 01:26:55,200 --> 01:26:58,240 Speaker 1: and you had a wealthy white man who was a 1662 01:26:58,240 --> 01:27:02,040 Speaker 1: former Republican, and then we had more of a mainstream 1663 01:27:02,040 --> 01:27:05,519 Speaker 1: Democrat Karen Bass and Karen Bass one. So the Johnson 1664 01:27:05,560 --> 01:27:09,520 Speaker 1: campaign they tried to cast Paul Vallas as essentially a Republican. 1665 01:27:09,600 --> 01:27:13,639 Speaker 1: He was supported by Republican donors, he appeared a lot 1666 01:27:13,680 --> 01:27:17,519 Speaker 1: on conservative talk radio. And what the results were is 1667 01:27:17,560 --> 01:27:21,320 Speaker 1: that the more wealthy areas of Chicago, the more socially 1668 01:27:21,360 --> 01:27:24,840 Speaker 1: conserved areas of Chicago, a lot of police and firefighters lived, 1669 01:27:25,080 --> 01:27:28,040 Speaker 1: they voted for Paul Vallas and big numbers. But then 1670 01:27:28,400 --> 01:27:30,560 Speaker 1: a lot of the minority areas in Chicago, and the 1671 01:27:30,680 --> 01:27:33,640 Speaker 1: more of the liberal activist areas of Chicago, kind of 1672 01:27:33,640 --> 01:27:37,640 Speaker 1: our local version of Williamsburg, you know, Logan Square and 1673 01:27:38,280 --> 01:27:41,360 Speaker 1: Rogers Park, they voted for Brandon Johnson in really big numbers, 1674 01:27:41,800 --> 01:27:44,760 Speaker 1: and Brandon Johnson one got it. So, Frank, a lot 1675 01:27:44,800 --> 01:27:48,559 Speaker 1: of people are interpreting this nationally about crime and all 1676 01:27:48,560 --> 01:27:51,200 Speaker 1: it can you what are the actual issues that were 1677 01:27:51,240 --> 01:27:54,880 Speaker 1: before people in Chicago. What was Johnson talking about? What 1678 01:27:54,920 --> 01:27:58,000 Speaker 1: was Valas talking about? Wasn't all about crime? Teachers break 1679 01:27:58,000 --> 01:28:01,400 Speaker 1: it all down for us. So so crime, according to 1680 01:28:01,479 --> 01:28:06,880 Speaker 1: all the polls, was the number one issue. However, it 1681 01:28:06,960 --> 01:28:10,599 Speaker 1: kind of meant different things for different people. So Brandon Johnson, 1682 01:28:10,640 --> 01:28:14,679 Speaker 1: he's a counting commissioner. He was supporting defunding the police 1683 01:28:15,200 --> 01:28:18,759 Speaker 1: as accounting commissioner. When he ran for mayor, he changed 1684 01:28:18,800 --> 01:28:22,200 Speaker 1: his tone. He said he will not defund the police. 1685 01:28:22,400 --> 01:28:26,440 Speaker 1: And I think this election came down to just dynamics 1686 01:28:26,479 --> 01:28:28,920 Speaker 1: of you know, who do you trust more to handle 1687 01:28:29,080 --> 01:28:31,800 Speaker 1: the crime issue. So Paul Valles he kind of ran 1688 01:28:31,840 --> 01:28:34,880 Speaker 1: as a lock him up, throwing away the key type 1689 01:28:34,880 --> 01:28:39,000 Speaker 1: of tough on crime. And then you know, Brandon Johnson 1690 01:28:39,040 --> 01:28:41,920 Speaker 1: ran as more of a holistic kind of you know, 1691 01:28:41,960 --> 01:28:46,200 Speaker 1: your progressive approach to treat crime. You know, look at 1692 01:28:46,200 --> 01:28:50,000 Speaker 1: the root cause of crime. So both campaigns ran on crime, 1693 01:28:50,400 --> 01:28:54,599 Speaker 1: but the more mainstream democratic, progressive version of that, which 1694 01:28:54,680 --> 01:28:57,600 Speaker 1: is kind of a more holistic approach to crime that 1695 01:28:57,720 --> 01:29:01,360 Speaker 1: one in the day with City Chicago voters. Let's take 1696 01:29:01,360 --> 01:29:04,080 Speaker 1: a listen to you a little bit of Brandon Johnson. 1697 01:29:04,120 --> 01:29:06,360 Speaker 1: I believe this is part of his victory speech just 1698 01:29:06,360 --> 01:29:07,760 Speaker 1: so folks can get a bit of a sense of him. 1699 01:29:07,800 --> 01:29:10,559 Speaker 1: Let's take a listen to that. Make no mistake about it, 1700 01:29:10,920 --> 01:29:14,799 Speaker 1: Chicago is a union town by investing in what actually 1701 01:29:14,840 --> 01:29:21,840 Speaker 1: works to prevent crime, and that means youth employment, mental 1702 01:29:21,880 --> 01:29:25,519 Speaker 1: health centers, ensuring that law enforcement has the resources to 1703 01:29:25,560 --> 01:29:29,840 Speaker 1: solve and prevent crime. A city that actually respects the 1704 01:29:29,880 --> 01:29:33,880 Speaker 1: workers who keep it running and supports the entrepreneurs that 1705 01:29:34,080 --> 01:29:38,639 Speaker 1: keep it growing. A city where trains run on time 1706 01:29:39,000 --> 01:29:41,720 Speaker 1: and where no one is too poor to live in 1707 01:29:41,760 --> 01:29:44,200 Speaker 1: one of the richest cities in one of the wealthiest nations, 1708 01:29:44,360 --> 01:29:46,240 Speaker 1: have the richest time in the history of the world. 1709 01:29:50,680 --> 01:29:54,439 Speaker 1: A city where public schools have the resources to meet 1710 01:29:54,479 --> 01:30:00,680 Speaker 1: the needs of every child across this city. Now, in 1711 01:30:00,720 --> 01:30:05,160 Speaker 1: other words, tonight is the beginning of a Chicago that 1712 01:30:05,240 --> 01:30:10,400 Speaker 1: truly invests in all of its people. So Frankie can 1713 01:30:10,439 --> 01:30:14,240 Speaker 1: really hear the way that he framed his public safety messaging, 1714 01:30:14,280 --> 01:30:17,280 Speaker 1: and it is sounding some sort of classic progressive themes. 1715 01:30:17,360 --> 01:30:19,920 Speaker 1: I know that the numbers I saw, he won something 1716 01:30:19,960 --> 01:30:22,519 Speaker 1: like eighty percent of the black vote in the city. 1717 01:30:23,080 --> 01:30:26,040 Speaker 1: Working class black voters are actually an area where progressives 1718 01:30:26,040 --> 01:30:30,360 Speaker 1: have sometimes struggled. Do you see his messaging as being 1719 01:30:30,560 --> 01:30:34,960 Speaker 1: key to putting together this winning coalition. Is this something 1720 01:30:35,000 --> 01:30:37,439 Speaker 1: that you think progressives could look to replicate in other 1721 01:30:37,479 --> 01:30:40,800 Speaker 1: cities or are there unique dynamics here in Chicago which 1722 01:30:40,840 --> 01:30:43,720 Speaker 1: really just have to do with the particulars of these 1723 01:30:43,760 --> 01:30:49,160 Speaker 1: communities and this particular political race. Yeah, I think you 1724 01:30:49,200 --> 01:30:52,040 Speaker 1: have to look at Chicago again. It's two person race, 1725 01:30:52,600 --> 01:30:59,360 Speaker 1: right and Paul Vallas. Again it's a majority minority city 1726 01:31:00,080 --> 01:31:04,600 Speaker 1: to very liberal city Chicago is, and Paul Vallas he 1727 01:31:04,760 --> 01:31:07,559 Speaker 1: had a like a high floor and a low ceiling. 1728 01:31:08,680 --> 01:31:11,640 Speaker 1: You know, he he essentially was branded as a Republican, 1729 01:31:12,479 --> 01:31:16,400 Speaker 1: and you know, he he had trouble on hitting fifty percent. 1730 01:31:16,560 --> 01:31:19,360 Speaker 1: It's really crazy because all the polls was having him 1731 01:31:19,520 --> 01:31:21,679 Speaker 1: like a forty eight percent, and that's probably where he's 1732 01:31:21,680 --> 01:31:24,920 Speaker 1: going to finish. He was not able to grow his coalition. 1733 01:31:25,120 --> 01:31:28,880 Speaker 1: So I'm not too sure that you know, a progressive 1734 01:31:29,840 --> 01:31:32,599 Speaker 1: in the brand of Brandon Johnson could win in New 1735 01:31:32,680 --> 01:31:36,880 Speaker 1: York per se, which historically you know, vote for more 1736 01:31:37,080 --> 01:31:39,720 Speaker 1: modern type of mayors. You know, people like Bloomberg and 1737 01:31:39,800 --> 01:31:43,519 Speaker 1: now you know Eric Adams. So yeah, so I think 1738 01:31:43,560 --> 01:31:45,280 Speaker 1: you have to look at Chicago. You have to look 1739 01:31:45,280 --> 01:31:48,360 Speaker 1: at both the candidates and how Paul Vallas was was 1740 01:31:48,439 --> 01:31:51,679 Speaker 1: kind of a flawed candidate for a big liberal city. Yeah, 1741 01:31:51,920 --> 01:31:54,599 Speaker 1: another question I had for you, Frank, is did abortion 1742 01:31:54,760 --> 01:31:58,760 Speaker 1: politics play here at all? They were obviously quite significant 1743 01:31:58,800 --> 01:32:01,719 Speaker 1: in a Wisconsin state Supreme Court race that we covered 1744 01:32:02,000 --> 01:32:04,080 Speaker 1: here at breaking points too. It was really, you know, 1745 01:32:04,080 --> 01:32:07,800 Speaker 1: potentially the determinative factor in the more liberal candidate just 1746 01:32:07,880 --> 01:32:11,519 Speaker 1: absolutely romping in that race. But I had read that 1747 01:32:11,680 --> 01:32:16,040 Speaker 1: Vallas had made some previous comments that were oppositional to abortion, 1748 01:32:16,320 --> 01:32:19,200 Speaker 1: and that Brandon Johnson also used those against him. Do 1749 01:32:19,240 --> 01:32:21,479 Speaker 1: you think that abortion politics played in this at all? 1750 01:32:21,560 --> 01:32:23,840 Speaker 1: Wasn't a significant factor, even as we understand, crime was 1751 01:32:23,920 --> 01:32:27,400 Speaker 1: kind of the main focus. So when it comes to 1752 01:32:27,479 --> 01:32:31,479 Speaker 1: Chicago politics, you look at local aldermen, you know, the 1753 01:32:31,520 --> 01:32:34,400 Speaker 1: city council members, we call them aldermen here. They really 1754 01:32:34,520 --> 01:32:37,160 Speaker 1: run on kind of bread and butter type issues, and 1755 01:32:37,320 --> 01:32:40,960 Speaker 1: they run on crime, they run on quality of life. 1756 01:32:41,000 --> 01:32:44,240 Speaker 1: You know, they've run on taking the trash out. When 1757 01:32:44,280 --> 01:32:47,519 Speaker 1: people vote for mayor and local officials, I really don't 1758 01:32:47,520 --> 01:32:53,040 Speaker 1: think they vote on abortion politics or more national politics. 1759 01:32:53,920 --> 01:32:56,559 Speaker 1: You know, abortion was talked about in this campaign. But 1760 01:32:56,880 --> 01:33:01,080 Speaker 1: it wasn't really highlighted like you see in the Wisconsins 1761 01:33:01,120 --> 01:33:04,240 Speaker 1: Supreme Court race. We're obviously the Supreme Court Wisconsin. They're 1762 01:33:04,240 --> 01:33:08,799 Speaker 1: going to be dealing with abortion directly. In Chicago, you know, abortion, 1763 01:33:09,840 --> 01:33:12,560 Speaker 1: you know, it's it's going to be as safe and accessible, 1764 01:33:12,760 --> 01:33:14,400 Speaker 1: you know, at least in my lifetime, because it's a 1765 01:33:14,520 --> 01:33:18,519 Speaker 1: very liberal city. So it wasn't as talked about as much. Yeah. Yeah, 1766 01:33:18,560 --> 01:33:20,360 Speaker 1: perhaps just used is a way again to sort of 1767 01:33:20,400 --> 01:33:22,360 Speaker 1: paint him as like, this guy's not really one of us, 1768 01:33:22,360 --> 01:33:25,800 Speaker 1: he's really a Republican. Frank, tell people where people where 1769 01:33:25,840 --> 01:33:28,240 Speaker 1: folks can find you on Twitter, because that's where we 1770 01:33:28,280 --> 01:33:31,800 Speaker 1: found you and found your analysis really useful. Oh thanks 1771 01:33:31,800 --> 01:33:33,800 Speaker 1: a lot. Yeah, so it's just my name. It's at 1772 01:33:33,840 --> 01:33:36,919 Speaker 1: Frank Calbary's. I do a lot of politics in Chicago, 1773 01:33:37,160 --> 01:33:40,760 Speaker 1: and you know, I wasn't I work for the government now, 1774 01:33:40,800 --> 01:33:43,479 Speaker 1: so I wasn't on the side. So the media they 1775 01:33:43,560 --> 01:33:45,560 Speaker 1: used me a lot kind of for my analysis, and 1776 01:33:45,640 --> 01:33:47,360 Speaker 1: it was a lot of fun. I was, you know, 1777 01:33:47,360 --> 01:33:49,919 Speaker 1: I got to be on TV a lot, nicely graduated 1778 01:33:50,120 --> 01:33:52,479 Speaker 1: locally in Chicago, but it was a lot. Now we're 1779 01:33:52,479 --> 01:33:54,680 Speaker 1: bringing out your national making me a national taking a 1780 01:33:54,800 --> 01:33:57,040 Speaker 1: national Frank, great to have you. Thanks so much for 1781 01:33:57,080 --> 01:33:58,960 Speaker 1: taking the time. Thanks man, great, Thank you so much. 1782 01:33:58,960 --> 01:34:01,599 Speaker 1: Appreciate it. Yeah, pleasure you. Thank you guys so much 1783 01:34:01,640 --> 01:34:03,680 Speaker 1: for watching. Really appreciate it. The shout out to all 1784 01:34:03,680 --> 01:34:06,439 Speaker 1: the premium subscribers watching our show on Spotify, you guys 1785 01:34:06,439 --> 01:34:09,000 Speaker 1: are loving it and also still you know, the existing 1786 01:34:09,000 --> 01:34:11,599 Speaker 1: show on YouTube. Everybody, thank you also for supporting our 1787 01:34:11,600 --> 01:34:14,360 Speaker 1: show enabling our live stream that we had. It was 1788 01:34:14,400 --> 01:34:16,800 Speaker 1: a great time. We've still got a great counterpoint show 1789 01:34:16,840 --> 01:34:19,680 Speaker 1: for everybody tomorrow to bring everybody up to date on 1790 01:34:19,760 --> 01:34:22,679 Speaker 1: the news for Friday. So you basically had something every 1791 01:34:22,680 --> 01:34:24,519 Speaker 1: single day this week, which I think is really cool 1792 01:34:24,560 --> 01:34:27,280 Speaker 1: here for breaking points. We appreciate everybody who enables our 1793 01:34:27,280 --> 01:34:29,120 Speaker 1: work and we will see you all next week. Love 1794 01:34:29,160 --> 01:34:30,120 Speaker 1: y'all have a great weekend.