WEBVTT - Biden's Challenges Only Get Harder

0:00:01.800 --> 0:00:04.440
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week. I'm Karl Masser and I'm

0:00:04.480 --> 0:00:07.280
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stanivik. We're here every day bringing

0:00:07.320 --> 0:00:09.840
<v Speaker 1>you the latest news from the world to business and finance,

0:00:09.840 --> 0:00:13.640
<v Speaker 1>plus technology, politics, economics, all partnising the power of Business

0:00:13.680 --> 0:00:17.160
<v Speaker 1>Week reporters and editors, not to mention our journalists and

0:00:17.160 --> 0:00:20.000
<v Speaker 1>analyst in more than one twenty countries. You can download

0:00:20.000 --> 0:00:23.239
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business Week and iTunes, SoundCloud, or Bloomberg dot Com.

0:00:23.400 --> 0:00:25.200
<v Speaker 1>You can also listen to our radio show at two

0:00:25.200 --> 0:00:27.880
<v Speaker 1>pm Eastern Time on Bloomberg Radio or watch us on

0:00:27.920 --> 0:00:31.400
<v Speaker 1>YouTube search Bloomberg Global News. Every day, there are many

0:00:31.400 --> 0:00:33.960
<v Speaker 1>stories about the virus and vaccine rollout. Tim and I

0:00:34.080 --> 0:00:37.960
<v Speaker 1>just felt like brought you two disturbing ones about long

0:00:38.040 --> 0:00:41.800
<v Speaker 1>haulers study showing COVID can kill months after the infection,

0:00:41.880 --> 0:00:44.960
<v Speaker 1>and then Brazil how it's expanding out to younger people.

0:00:45.000 --> 0:00:46.800
<v Speaker 1>The other thing Tim, you and I've talked a lot

0:00:46.840 --> 0:00:50.000
<v Speaker 1>about is what's going on in India. Yeah, the rising

0:00:50.040 --> 0:00:53.920
<v Speaker 1>cases dramatically. They're especially given that a year ago this

0:00:54.160 --> 0:00:57.280
<v Speaker 1>was a country that was in lockdown. This is happening

0:00:57.320 --> 0:00:59.680
<v Speaker 1>so quickly. Yeah, it's really tough to kind of watch.

0:01:00.040 --> 0:01:02.040
<v Speaker 1>Let's get an update though on COVID nineteen and what

0:01:02.040 --> 0:01:04.480
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing globally when it comes to the virus. Dr

0:01:04.520 --> 0:01:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Amos Hidalga is an infectious disease physician Senior scholar at

0:01:07.880 --> 0:01:10.680
<v Speaker 1>Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security at the Bloomberg School

0:01:10.720 --> 0:01:13.720
<v Speaker 1>of Public Health, supported by Michael R. Bloomberg, founder of Bloomberg,

0:01:13.760 --> 0:01:16.760
<v Speaker 1>Gulp and Bloomberg Philanthropies. Dr Dlja with us on the

0:01:16.760 --> 0:01:19.880
<v Speaker 1>phone in Pittsburgh. DRDLJA, Nice to have you back here

0:01:19.880 --> 0:01:22.880
<v Speaker 1>with Tim and myself. How are you? I'm good? Are

0:01:22.959 --> 0:01:25.520
<v Speaker 1>you doing okay? Doing okay? Although a little bummed out

0:01:25.520 --> 0:01:28.720
<v Speaker 1>by some of these long hauler stories and also just

0:01:28.760 --> 0:01:31.680
<v Speaker 1>looking at what's going on in India. Everybody keeps reminding

0:01:31.760 --> 0:01:34.680
<v Speaker 1>us that unless we get this globally under control, we

0:01:34.720 --> 0:01:37.360
<v Speaker 1>will not get beyond COVID. How do you see it?

0:01:38.600 --> 0:01:40.959
<v Speaker 1>I definitely think that's the case that we have a

0:01:40.959 --> 0:01:44.120
<v Speaker 1>worldwide pandemic and the world will still be disrupted. The

0:01:44.160 --> 0:01:47.240
<v Speaker 1>world will not be safe until this virus is controlled

0:01:47.240 --> 0:01:49.920
<v Speaker 1>in all the countries around the globe, and it's going

0:01:49.960 --> 0:01:53.840
<v Speaker 1>to take some time, probably well into two So there

0:01:53.880 --> 0:01:56.680
<v Speaker 1>really needs to be a shift in priorities as we

0:01:56.760 --> 0:02:00.400
<v Speaker 1>get most of our population vaccinated to trying to came

0:02:00.480 --> 0:02:02.840
<v Speaker 1>this all over all over the globe, and it's going

0:02:02.920 --> 0:02:04.720
<v Speaker 1>to be, you know, one of the biggest public health

0:02:04.760 --> 0:02:07.640
<v Speaker 1>challenges that we face, because it is a really steep,

0:02:07.720 --> 0:02:10.079
<v Speaker 1>uphill battle in places like India and Brazil and even

0:02:10.120 --> 0:02:12.800
<v Speaker 1>Europe and even Canada. What's the right way to do

0:02:12.840 --> 0:02:14.560
<v Speaker 1>that though? Is it is it with the mr Anda

0:02:14.720 --> 0:02:17.840
<v Speaker 1>vaccines or is it is it really with these other vaccines,

0:02:17.840 --> 0:02:20.679
<v Speaker 1>potentially the Johnson and Johnson vaccine, the astros ennica shot,

0:02:20.880 --> 0:02:23.320
<v Speaker 1>ones that don't need to be stored in such cold conditions,

0:02:23.360 --> 0:02:27.000
<v Speaker 1>one that don't necessarily need two shots. It's all of

0:02:27.000 --> 0:02:28.960
<v Speaker 1>the above. It's whatever you can do. So if you

0:02:28.960 --> 0:02:31.200
<v Speaker 1>have places that can handle the storage requirements of the

0:02:31.200 --> 0:02:35.240
<v Speaker 1>astrosenica and fisor vaccines, you can use those. In other places,

0:02:35.320 --> 0:02:37.000
<v Speaker 1>you're going to need to use the Johnson and Johnson,

0:02:37.000 --> 0:02:39.240
<v Speaker 1>the mastros ennica vaccines, and there are other vaccines as

0:02:39.240 --> 0:02:42.160
<v Speaker 1>well that we have some data from that are developed

0:02:42.160 --> 0:02:45.480
<v Speaker 1>in other countries. But it really has to be anything

0:02:45.520 --> 0:02:47.680
<v Speaker 1>that you can get into people's arms that has efficacy

0:02:47.680 --> 0:02:50.400
<v Speaker 1>at preventing seriously, the hospitalization and death needs to be

0:02:50.840 --> 0:02:53.440
<v Speaker 1>what what occurs. And there are MR and A vaccines

0:02:53.440 --> 0:02:55.959
<v Speaker 1>that are in development and don't have those storage requirements. So,

0:02:56.000 --> 0:02:58.639
<v Speaker 1>for example, there's a German company called cure Vac as

0:02:58.639 --> 0:03:01.120
<v Speaker 1>an m R and A vaccine that doesn't require that

0:03:01.200 --> 0:03:03.560
<v Speaker 1>cold temperature storage. That could also be an option. To remember,

0:03:03.600 --> 0:03:06.200
<v Speaker 1>we've got Novavacs in the wings as well. Their Phase

0:03:06.240 --> 0:03:07.880
<v Speaker 1>three data should be coming up, so there's likely to

0:03:07.880 --> 0:03:10.160
<v Speaker 1>be multiple candidates. And I think we just basically have

0:03:10.280 --> 0:03:13.120
<v Speaker 1>to blanket the world with whatever they can get in

0:03:13.200 --> 0:03:16.480
<v Speaker 1>order to stamp out this infection. Well, I just want

0:03:16.480 --> 0:03:17.799
<v Speaker 1>to push that a little bit further. Was talking to

0:03:17.800 --> 0:03:19.560
<v Speaker 1>somebody who's from India, was just talking about all the

0:03:19.639 --> 0:03:22.040
<v Speaker 1>vaccines that they are developing specifically. We don't really hear

0:03:22.080 --> 0:03:24.680
<v Speaker 1>about it because we're focusing so much at least in

0:03:24.720 --> 0:03:26.880
<v Speaker 1>the US and some of the vaccines that we directly

0:03:26.919 --> 0:03:30.240
<v Speaker 1>have access to. But you know, ultimately, as you said,

0:03:30.400 --> 0:03:32.920
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna need multiple tools. That's been kind of a

0:03:33.000 --> 0:03:36.120
<v Speaker 1>story from day one on all of this. Or do

0:03:36.200 --> 0:03:38.280
<v Speaker 1>you see in terms of getting it really under control

0:03:38.280 --> 0:03:41.160
<v Speaker 1>globally that companies like Maderna Fiser are really going to

0:03:41.240 --> 0:03:45.320
<v Speaker 1>have to step up big time Maderna adviser. Are you know?

0:03:45.440 --> 0:03:47.880
<v Speaker 1>Their vaccines have been proven to be highly efficacious, they

0:03:47.920 --> 0:03:51.800
<v Speaker 1>have manufacturing capacity, they have not had any major hiccups.

0:03:51.800 --> 0:03:53.440
<v Speaker 1>They do think that they're going to be a component

0:03:53.560 --> 0:03:56.320
<v Speaker 1>of how we vaccinate the world, whether or not they're

0:03:56.360 --> 0:03:59.760
<v Speaker 1>the major component. With astros aneka and and Johnson and

0:03:59.840 --> 0:04:02.720
<v Speaker 1>john Us and other vaccines as well as Chinese vaccines,

0:04:02.760 --> 0:04:05.240
<v Speaker 1>Russian vaccines and other ones that we don't know about,

0:04:05.240 --> 0:04:07.160
<v Speaker 1>it's likely to be a hodgepodge. But I do think

0:04:07.200 --> 0:04:10.360
<v Speaker 1>that the vaccines that have the most proven track record

0:04:10.400 --> 0:04:13.920
<v Speaker 1>tend to be the Fisermadurna vaccines, So those are obviously

0:04:13.960 --> 0:04:15.920
<v Speaker 1>going to be the ones that people will try to

0:04:16.040 --> 0:04:18.080
<v Speaker 1>use if they have the ability to to use them

0:04:18.080 --> 0:04:20.680
<v Speaker 1>in those situations. But I don't think that astras nic

0:04:20.760 --> 0:04:22.920
<v Speaker 1>and Johnson Johnsons should be dismissed. I think those are

0:04:23.000 --> 0:04:26.480
<v Speaker 1>really great vaccines for and I would take those vaccines now.

0:04:26.520 --> 0:04:28.279
<v Speaker 1>I think those vaccines should be used in the United

0:04:28.320 --> 0:04:31.680
<v Speaker 1>States as well. But so I really think it's going

0:04:31.720 --> 0:04:34.160
<v Speaker 1>to be a portfolio approach in each country is gonna

0:04:34.160 --> 0:04:38.680
<v Speaker 1>have different requirements and different capacities to be able to vaccinate.

0:04:39.320 --> 0:04:41.960
<v Speaker 1>When do you think J and J that shot could

0:04:42.000 --> 0:04:46.679
<v Speaker 1>be approved again Friday. I suspect and Friday the puzzle

0:04:46.800 --> 0:04:49.320
<v Speaker 1>be lift. You'll see lifted. They'll see something similar probably

0:04:49.360 --> 0:04:51.080
<v Speaker 1>what the E m A did. There'll be a warning

0:04:51.160 --> 0:04:53.040
<v Speaker 1>label on it saying that there is this side effect

0:04:53.120 --> 0:04:56.080
<v Speaker 1>risk of clots and that if you are at higher

0:04:56.160 --> 0:04:58.160
<v Speaker 1>risk for those clots, if you're in that age group

0:04:58.200 --> 0:05:00.480
<v Speaker 1>that we saw the signal, int haveing to dicussion with

0:05:00.520 --> 0:05:03.479
<v Speaker 1>your doctors. I suspect Friday, um, and hopefully this will

0:05:03.480 --> 0:05:05.720
<v Speaker 1>be something that we can resume at the same pace

0:05:05.760 --> 0:05:07.880
<v Speaker 1>as before. I don't know if that's going to be

0:05:07.920 --> 0:05:10.440
<v Speaker 1>the case, because some polling does show vaccine hesitancy has

0:05:10.520 --> 0:05:12.880
<v Speaker 1>increased with Johnson and Johnson. But it is important that

0:05:12.920 --> 0:05:15.559
<v Speaker 1>now Johnson and Johnson has unpaused what's going on in Europe,

0:05:15.560 --> 0:05:17.839
<v Speaker 1>They're going to continue to roll out in Europe, which

0:05:17.839 --> 0:05:20.919
<v Speaker 1>is really important. Uh, and hopefully we'll see this vaccine

0:05:20.920 --> 0:05:23.200
<v Speaker 1>return to kind of its place of prominence, I think

0:05:23.200 --> 0:05:25.560
<v Speaker 1>where it belongs. Hey, Dr geal Joanes, just the last

0:05:25.560 --> 0:05:27.080
<v Speaker 1>minute that we have and then we'll come back with you.

0:05:27.600 --> 0:05:30.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm wondering about what happens if the virus goes uncontained

0:05:30.920 --> 0:05:32.960
<v Speaker 1>in other parts of the world when the United States

0:05:33.000 --> 0:05:35.159
<v Speaker 1>does get to so called herd immunity. I know the

0:05:35.160 --> 0:05:39.120
<v Speaker 1>worst case scenarios that variations developed or variance develop, excuse me,

0:05:39.400 --> 0:05:43.080
<v Speaker 1>that can penetrate vaccinations. But does anything indicate to you

0:05:43.200 --> 0:05:46.880
<v Speaker 1>that that could be a real possibility right now, because

0:05:47.080 --> 0:05:49.719
<v Speaker 1>these vaccines thus far have have proven really resilient to

0:05:49.800 --> 0:05:54.159
<v Speaker 1>these variant variations, right these variants exactly. So, I do

0:05:54.200 --> 0:05:56.920
<v Speaker 1>think variances will continue to occur as the virus french

0:05:56.960 --> 0:06:00.240
<v Speaker 1>from person to person. But I'm I'm confident that our

0:06:00.279 --> 0:06:03.960
<v Speaker 1>vaccines will be able to stop what matters, serious disease, hospitalization,

0:06:04.000 --> 0:06:06.200
<v Speaker 1>and death, even when it comes to problematic variance. That's

0:06:06.200 --> 0:06:08.240
<v Speaker 1>what we've seen so far. But but it will be

0:06:08.360 --> 0:06:10.520
<v Speaker 1>challenging if the world is not if the world is

0:06:10.520 --> 0:06:14.520
<v Speaker 1>still not containing this virus, because international travel, international trade,

0:06:14.520 --> 0:06:16.599
<v Speaker 1>all of that is still going to be disrupted for

0:06:16.680 --> 0:06:18.520
<v Speaker 1>some period of time. Let's get right back to Dr

0:06:18.520 --> 0:06:21.480
<v Speaker 1>Ames Adulge, a senior scholar an infectious disease physician at

0:06:21.480 --> 0:06:23.719
<v Speaker 1>the Center for Health Security, I think JOHNS. Hopkins Bloomberg

0:06:23.800 --> 0:06:26.640
<v Speaker 1>School of Health. He joins us on the phone from Pittsburgh.

0:06:26.720 --> 0:06:29.120
<v Speaker 1>Dr adulge. I want to talk with you again about

0:06:29.200 --> 0:06:32.880
<v Speaker 1>messaging and what a difference a vaccine makes, because we

0:06:32.920 --> 0:06:36.280
<v Speaker 1>are getting mixed messages from different people about what is

0:06:36.320 --> 0:06:38.880
<v Speaker 1>safe and what is not safe to do after you

0:06:38.920 --> 0:06:42.599
<v Speaker 1>get completely vaccinated, tell me what you do now that

0:06:42.680 --> 0:06:47.080
<v Speaker 1>you've received both of your shots. I'm basically as close

0:06:47.160 --> 0:06:49.520
<v Speaker 1>to my normal like as as I can be, and

0:06:49.600 --> 0:06:51.640
<v Speaker 1>I tend to be a very risk tolerant person, and

0:06:51.640 --> 0:06:55.119
<v Speaker 1>I was taking calculated risks the entire pandemic even before

0:06:55.120 --> 0:06:57.200
<v Speaker 1>I was vaccinated. So I may be a bit of

0:06:57.200 --> 0:06:59.919
<v Speaker 1>an abarition in my field, but I think it's important

0:07:00.040 --> 0:07:03.760
<v Speaker 1>remember that once you're fully vaccinated, the whole risk calculation

0:07:04.040 --> 0:07:05.880
<v Speaker 1>that we've had to go through for so long is

0:07:05.880 --> 0:07:10.480
<v Speaker 1>completely altered because you are now basically protected from serious

0:07:10.520 --> 0:07:14.160
<v Speaker 1>disease and hospitalization or death. You're also very unlikely to

0:07:14.200 --> 0:07:16.920
<v Speaker 1>even develop symptomatic infection, and you're very unlikely to be

0:07:16.960 --> 0:07:19.800
<v Speaker 1>a spreader of infection. So I do think that while

0:07:19.840 --> 0:07:22.440
<v Speaker 1>the risk is not zero, it is very close to zero,

0:07:22.520 --> 0:07:25.040
<v Speaker 1>and it is something to me that I find acceptable,

0:07:25.280 --> 0:07:26.960
<v Speaker 1>and I think that's what we need to be telling

0:07:27.000 --> 0:07:29.400
<v Speaker 1>people that, based on your risk tolerance, start to re

0:07:29.520 --> 0:07:32.880
<v Speaker 1>engage with the world, and that's going to move the needle.

0:07:32.920 --> 0:07:35.520
<v Speaker 1>I think on vaccine hesitancy, because there's many people who

0:07:35.520 --> 0:07:37.920
<v Speaker 1>think that, you know, if the vaccine doesn't change anything,

0:07:37.920 --> 0:07:39.400
<v Speaker 1>why am I going through all of us? And I

0:07:39.440 --> 0:07:41.600
<v Speaker 1>think there's been a lot of underselling of this vaccine

0:07:41.600 --> 0:07:44.480
<v Speaker 1>and we're paying the consequence for it. So what does

0:07:44.520 --> 0:07:46.880
<v Speaker 1>that mean though for people who have kids? Because kids

0:07:46.880 --> 0:07:49.000
<v Speaker 1>are still a group that that can't be vaccinated. And

0:07:49.000 --> 0:07:51.119
<v Speaker 1>this is something I know I'm going through. My friends

0:07:51.120 --> 0:07:54.400
<v Speaker 1>are going through. Okay, so we're vaccinated, they're vaccinated, but

0:07:54.440 --> 0:07:56.760
<v Speaker 1>our kids aren't. So you know, what's safe for for

0:07:56.800 --> 0:07:59.040
<v Speaker 1>what safe behavior for us? Can we all get together?

0:07:59.120 --> 0:08:02.120
<v Speaker 1>We don't know. So there's a great article in the

0:08:02.160 --> 0:08:04.160
<v Speaker 1>New York Times to me by David Leonhardt said, I

0:08:04.240 --> 0:08:06.280
<v Speaker 1>was quoted in some other colleagues that hockeyes were quoted

0:08:06.280 --> 0:08:08.560
<v Speaker 1>in the talk directly on this issue. So I recommend that.

0:08:08.600 --> 0:08:10.560
<v Speaker 1>But in general, this is all going to depend on

0:08:10.600 --> 0:08:12.840
<v Speaker 1>your risk tolerance. Children tend to be spared from the

0:08:12.840 --> 0:08:15.720
<v Speaker 1>severe consequences of disease, children that tend not to be

0:08:16.080 --> 0:08:18.560
<v Speaker 1>major spreaders of infection, So I think that you can

0:08:18.600 --> 0:08:21.320
<v Speaker 1>be much more flexible with children. Remember what you did

0:08:21.400 --> 0:08:23.600
<v Speaker 1>during flu season? What did you do with your children

0:08:23.680 --> 0:08:27.840
<v Speaker 1>during flu season? Probably not that much different. But every year,

0:08:28.880 --> 0:08:31.240
<v Speaker 1>right even with the flu see even with the flu shot,

0:08:31.480 --> 0:08:34.280
<v Speaker 1>the number of deaths that occur in children, you know

0:08:34.280 --> 0:08:36.920
<v Speaker 1>in the hundreds every year from influenza, even with the

0:08:36.920 --> 0:08:39.439
<v Speaker 1>ability of the vaccine. So just remember, just try to

0:08:39.559 --> 0:08:42.160
<v Speaker 1>risk calibrate. And I'm not trying to minimize what COVID

0:08:42.240 --> 0:08:45.760
<v Speaker 1>nineteen is overall, but in children, influenza has a more

0:08:45.840 --> 0:08:49.000
<v Speaker 1>dangerous illness than than COVID nineteen is. And I think

0:08:49.040 --> 0:08:51.360
<v Speaker 1>that's that's not the case in adults, but it's not

0:08:51.440 --> 0:08:53.280
<v Speaker 1>the case overall, But in children, I think you have

0:08:53.320 --> 0:08:55.720
<v Speaker 1>a lot more flexibility. So I do think that you

0:08:55.800 --> 0:08:59.520
<v Speaker 1>can as much as your risk tolerance allows do this

0:08:59.720 --> 0:09:02.080
<v Speaker 1>obvious seem a child that's asmatic, that's a different story,

0:09:02.160 --> 0:09:04.400
<v Speaker 1>or a child that has special needs or medical problems

0:09:04.480 --> 0:09:06.840
<v Speaker 1>or lung disease or immunit suppressed, you have to be

0:09:06.960 --> 0:09:09.320
<v Speaker 1>much more careful. But if you've got a healthy child

0:09:09.320 --> 0:09:11.000
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't have those conditions, I think you could be

0:09:11.040 --> 0:09:14.400
<v Speaker 1>a lot more free with with how you interact once

0:09:14.440 --> 0:09:17.080
<v Speaker 1>your family is vaccinator, or even before, because many children

0:09:17.120 --> 0:09:20.320
<v Speaker 1>have been interacting throughout this pandemic. Remember, we've had schools open,

0:09:20.320 --> 0:09:22.959
<v Speaker 1>we've had daycare centers open, we've had Little League sports,

0:09:22.960 --> 0:09:26.360
<v Speaker 1>and we haven't really seen major negative effects and children.

0:09:26.400 --> 0:09:28.560
<v Speaker 1>Nothing on the scale of what would worry me or

0:09:28.559 --> 0:09:30.840
<v Speaker 1>what I think is an unacceptable risk if that's difficirom

0:09:30.840 --> 0:09:34.200
<v Speaker 1>person to person. So we have a great story in

0:09:34.200 --> 0:09:36.880
<v Speaker 1>Bloemberg Business Week magazine this week. It's the Remarks and

0:09:36.920 --> 0:09:39.439
<v Speaker 1>it talks about how, since the beginning of the pandemic,

0:09:39.559 --> 0:09:42.120
<v Speaker 1>exactly when the US might reach her immunity for COVID

0:09:42.200 --> 0:09:45.440
<v Speaker 1>nineteen has been furiously debated in congressional hearings. Kind of

0:09:45.480 --> 0:09:49.440
<v Speaker 1>shorthand for the end of the pandemic dr adage, is

0:09:49.600 --> 0:09:53.400
<v Speaker 1>herd immunity truly kind of shorthand for the end of

0:09:53.400 --> 0:09:55.720
<v Speaker 1>the pandemic? Is that the case that if if we

0:09:55.760 --> 0:09:58.760
<v Speaker 1>get to her immunity, we could stop this virus or

0:09:58.800 --> 0:10:01.920
<v Speaker 1>it's not so simple. I don't think it's so simple.

0:10:01.960 --> 0:10:04.280
<v Speaker 1>I think her immunity is an important threshold to think

0:10:04.280 --> 0:10:06.199
<v Speaker 1>about it, but it's not the holy grail to me.

0:10:06.840 --> 0:10:09.240
<v Speaker 1>We get to the end of the pandemic, we get

0:10:09.280 --> 0:10:11.600
<v Speaker 1>to the end of the public health emergency when we

0:10:11.640 --> 0:10:14.640
<v Speaker 1>no longer have to fear for hospital capacity concerns, when

0:10:14.840 --> 0:10:17.080
<v Speaker 1>we've taken away the ability of the virus to cause

0:10:17.080 --> 0:10:19.720
<v Speaker 1>serious disease, hospitalization, death. And we're going to get there

0:10:20.080 --> 0:10:22.599
<v Speaker 1>long before we get to her immunity because for for

0:10:22.679 --> 0:10:25.680
<v Speaker 1>her community, we have to think about vaccinating every person.

0:10:25.800 --> 0:10:28.599
<v Speaker 1>And remember this vaccine is only emergency a proof for

0:10:28.720 --> 0:10:31.440
<v Speaker 1>children or people about the age of sixteen. You don't

0:10:31.600 --> 0:10:34.560
<v Speaker 1>even include children there. So that's gonna be sometimes what

0:10:34.720 --> 0:10:36.920
<v Speaker 1>I think it needs to be dispelled, as this notion

0:10:36.960 --> 0:10:38.719
<v Speaker 1>that COVID nineteen is going to go away, that it's

0:10:38.760 --> 0:10:41.560
<v Speaker 1>not going to be anything anybody talks about three years

0:10:41.559 --> 0:10:43.880
<v Speaker 1>from now. That's not the case. Remember there are four

0:10:43.920 --> 0:10:48.240
<v Speaker 1>other coronaviruses that cause of our common coals. This coronavirus

0:10:48.280 --> 0:10:50.559
<v Speaker 1>stars kvie two is going to establish itself and has

0:10:50.640 --> 0:10:54.360
<v Speaker 1>established itself in the human population. It's already infected other animals.

0:10:54.600 --> 0:10:56.880
<v Speaker 1>We can't eradicate it or eliminate it. What we're going

0:10:56.920 --> 0:10:58.600
<v Speaker 1>to have to do is live with it, but live

0:10:58.679 --> 0:11:00.640
<v Speaker 1>with it in a in a tam or form. Because

0:11:00.679 --> 0:11:03.000
<v Speaker 1>so many of our high risk individuals will be vaccinated,

0:11:03.200 --> 0:11:05.120
<v Speaker 1>but we're still going to have cases. We're still gonna

0:11:05.160 --> 0:11:06.719
<v Speaker 1>have disruption from what We're still going to have to

0:11:06.760 --> 0:11:09.240
<v Speaker 1>think about it, but it's not going to be something

0:11:09.600 --> 0:11:12.600
<v Speaker 1>that's very different from many of the other respiratory viruses

0:11:12.600 --> 0:11:13.960
<v Speaker 1>that we deal with on a day in and day

0:11:13.960 --> 0:11:17.199
<v Speaker 1>out basis every year, because the vaccine will have really

0:11:17.480 --> 0:11:20.720
<v Speaker 1>just changed what this virus is capable of. All right,

0:11:20.800 --> 0:11:23.160
<v Speaker 1>Gonna leave it on that note, Dr amish Adaga, thank

0:11:23.200 --> 0:11:26.280
<v Speaker 1>you so much, Infectious disease Physicians, Senior Scholar at Johns

0:11:26.320 --> 0:11:28.520
<v Speaker 1>Hopkins Center for Health Security at the Bloomberg School of

0:11:28.559 --> 0:11:31.040
<v Speaker 1>Public Health. Supported by Michael R. Bloomberg, Founder of Bloomberg

0:11:31.160 --> 0:11:35.600
<v Speaker 1>LP and Bloomberg Philanthropies. This is Bloomberg Business Week with

0:11:35.679 --> 0:11:40.400
<v Speaker 1>Carol Masser and Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stinovich from Bloomberg Radio.

0:11:40.800 --> 0:11:43.480
<v Speaker 1>President Biden Tim getting ready to mark his one day

0:11:43.880 --> 0:11:45.960
<v Speaker 1>in office that will happen this coming week, and with

0:11:46.040 --> 0:11:48.640
<v Speaker 1>that in mind, this week's cover story in Bloomberg Business

0:11:48.679 --> 0:11:51.120
<v Speaker 1>Week magazine takes really kind of a look back, reminding

0:11:51.240 --> 0:11:53.480
<v Speaker 1>us of all the things that President Biden had to

0:11:53.520 --> 0:11:55.760
<v Speaker 1>deal with when he took office. The health pandemic, a

0:11:55.840 --> 0:11:59.360
<v Speaker 1>sacking economy, are reckoning with centuries of racial injustice and

0:11:59.400 --> 0:12:02.760
<v Speaker 1>the existent threat of climate change. But it ain't over. Yeah,

0:12:02.840 --> 0:12:05.040
<v Speaker 1>now comes the hard part. Nancy Cook is white House

0:12:05.080 --> 0:12:08.440
<v Speaker 1>reporter at Bloomberg News, joining us on the phone from Washington,

0:12:08.720 --> 0:12:12.079
<v Speaker 1>d C. Nancy, I'm really happy that we're getting to

0:12:12.120 --> 0:12:15.120
<v Speaker 1>speak with you about this cover story in the latest

0:12:15.120 --> 0:12:18.240
<v Speaker 1>issue of Bloomberg Business Week. When you think about the

0:12:18.280 --> 0:12:22.480
<v Speaker 1>first one hundred days, Um, how has Biden done? Like,

0:12:22.520 --> 0:12:25.880
<v Speaker 1>how has he been able to do this? I think

0:12:25.880 --> 0:12:28.520
<v Speaker 1>most people would say that Biden has done a pretty

0:12:28.520 --> 0:12:32.240
<v Speaker 1>good job. You know, he has a majority of Americans

0:12:32.280 --> 0:12:36.520
<v Speaker 1>support him and pulling Democrats, even people who wish the

0:12:36.840 --> 0:12:39.720
<v Speaker 1>Senator Elizabeth Warren or Bernie Sanders had won the nomination.

0:12:40.160 --> 0:12:43.360
<v Speaker 1>They're really happy with him. Um, And he's even pulling

0:12:43.400 --> 0:12:46.439
<v Speaker 1>well with Republicans who feel like, you know, he's done

0:12:46.440 --> 0:12:49.120
<v Speaker 1>a pretty good job handling COVID and so what he

0:12:49.200 --> 0:12:53.720
<v Speaker 1>walked into chiefly were, you know, a pandemic and low

0:12:53.800 --> 0:12:58.280
<v Speaker 1>vaccination rates and schools closed and the economy really in

0:12:58.360 --> 0:13:01.960
<v Speaker 1>a swamp. And the hundred days has really been about

0:13:02.240 --> 0:13:05.200
<v Speaker 1>trying to solve those two crises. And they've gotten a

0:13:05.200 --> 0:13:08.760
<v Speaker 1>lot of that by ramping up the vaccine distribution by

0:13:08.760 --> 0:13:12.360
<v Speaker 1>getting more people vaccinated, and then passing this sweeping one

0:13:12.360 --> 0:13:16.040
<v Speaker 1>point nine trillion dollar COVID relief bill which gives money

0:13:16.040 --> 0:13:18.640
<v Speaker 1>for things like testing and school reopening and so so

0:13:18.760 --> 0:13:20.880
<v Speaker 1>much of the first one days have just been dealing

0:13:20.960 --> 0:13:23.920
<v Speaker 1>with crisis and now becomes the hard part where he's

0:13:23.920 --> 0:13:26.600
<v Speaker 1>really trying to do something to cement his legacy. Right. Listen,

0:13:26.600 --> 0:13:28.760
<v Speaker 1>he came into office, I mean, the whole pandemic, nobody

0:13:28.760 --> 0:13:30.520
<v Speaker 1>had a playbook, but it did feel like they hit

0:13:30.559 --> 0:13:32.840
<v Speaker 1>the ground running with a playbook in terms of dealing,

0:13:33.280 --> 0:13:35.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, with the vaccine rollout, in dealing with economic

0:13:35.960 --> 0:13:39.480
<v Speaker 1>stimulus and a lot of things. What is the playbook

0:13:39.520 --> 0:13:41.400
<v Speaker 1>for the next one days? What does it need to be?

0:13:41.440 --> 0:13:44.360
<v Speaker 1>What do people say it needs to be? Well, I

0:13:44.400 --> 0:13:46.600
<v Speaker 1>think the playbook that they're trying to do is now

0:13:46.640 --> 0:13:48.960
<v Speaker 1>that they have I mean, they still have to deal

0:13:49.040 --> 0:13:51.440
<v Speaker 1>with the pandemic, and there's still a lot of fallout

0:13:51.520 --> 0:13:53.520
<v Speaker 1>from the economic downturn, so no one in the White

0:13:53.559 --> 0:13:55.640
<v Speaker 1>House is discounting that. But what they're trying to do

0:13:55.720 --> 0:13:59.880
<v Speaker 1>now is sort of reshape the economy and propose the

0:14:00.080 --> 0:14:03.080
<v Speaker 1>big ideas that Democrats have long wanted to do. And

0:14:03.120 --> 0:14:06.360
<v Speaker 1>so that includes everything from infrastructure to more money for

0:14:06.520 --> 0:14:10.680
<v Speaker 1>childcare and elder care. And that's the sweeping set of packages.

0:14:10.800 --> 0:14:13.439
<v Speaker 1>President Biden is going to unveil this the third one

0:14:13.480 --> 0:14:17.240
<v Speaker 1>that he's talking about um on Wednesday, this coming Wednesday

0:14:17.280 --> 0:14:19.680
<v Speaker 1>at the State of the Union. And and those those

0:14:19.880 --> 0:14:23.240
<v Speaker 1>the most recent two packages, the infrastructure and this upcoming

0:14:23.360 --> 0:14:26.320
<v Speaker 1>families one. You know, that's more than three trillion dollars

0:14:26.320 --> 0:14:29.360
<v Speaker 1>in spending that they are proposing. They want to offset

0:14:29.360 --> 0:14:32.040
<v Speaker 1>it with tax increases, but again, it's a huge amount

0:14:32.040 --> 0:14:34.800
<v Speaker 1>of money, and their goal is to really not just

0:14:34.920 --> 0:14:37.120
<v Speaker 1>bring the economy back to where it was, but also

0:14:37.160 --> 0:14:39.040
<v Speaker 1>sort of try to make some tweaks to it and

0:14:39.080 --> 0:14:42.560
<v Speaker 1>reshape it. So obviously it's really ambitious. And the Biden

0:14:42.560 --> 0:14:46.360
<v Speaker 1>administration and Democrats, well Biden administration, you know, is the

0:14:46.400 --> 0:14:49.040
<v Speaker 1>Biden Biden's president. Democrats control the House and Senate, but

0:14:49.480 --> 0:14:52.920
<v Speaker 1>barely uh and there are some modern modern Democrats who

0:14:53.000 --> 0:14:56.120
<v Speaker 1>don't support these plans as they are right now. How

0:14:56.160 --> 0:14:58.280
<v Speaker 1>does Biden sell this and and to what extent does

0:14:58.320 --> 0:15:00.280
<v Speaker 1>it involve selling the plan to the American pe pole

0:15:00.560 --> 0:15:03.040
<v Speaker 1>in a way that President Obama didn't do when it

0:15:03.080 --> 0:15:06.800
<v Speaker 1>came to Obamacare. That's a great question. So the way

0:15:06.840 --> 0:15:09.120
<v Speaker 1>that they sold the COVID relief bill, which is the

0:15:09.160 --> 0:15:10.920
<v Speaker 1>way they're going to try to sell these two bills,

0:15:10.960 --> 0:15:14.119
<v Speaker 1>was really to try to build public support outside of Washington.

0:15:14.600 --> 0:15:16.440
<v Speaker 1>So what they have tried to do is to find

0:15:16.640 --> 0:15:21.280
<v Speaker 1>unity or bipartisanship, not really as Democratic lawmakers and Republican

0:15:21.360 --> 0:15:24.760
<v Speaker 1>lawmakers on Capitol Hill a green but more to try

0:15:24.760 --> 0:15:28.240
<v Speaker 1>to promote policies and and put forward ideas that appealed

0:15:28.240 --> 0:15:32.240
<v Speaker 1>to the majority of Americans. And so with the infrastructure package,

0:15:32.280 --> 0:15:36.000
<v Speaker 1>for instance, you know, sevent of Republican voters are in

0:15:36.080 --> 0:15:39.960
<v Speaker 1>favor of rebuilding roads and bridges, more job training, increasing

0:15:40.000 --> 0:15:42.680
<v Speaker 1>broad brand access, and those are the things that the

0:15:42.680 --> 0:15:45.120
<v Speaker 1>Biden White House is going to keep focusing on. These

0:15:45.120 --> 0:15:49.280
<v Speaker 1>plans that appeal to Democratic and Republican voters, not necessarily

0:15:49.360 --> 0:15:52.960
<v Speaker 1>just lawmakers on Capitol Hill. That's really the political strategy.

0:15:53.080 --> 0:15:55.400
<v Speaker 1>Is it a smart strategy? Does it work? Will it work?

0:15:56.560 --> 0:15:59.240
<v Speaker 1>It works with a COVID release bill it worked very well,

0:15:59.760 --> 0:16:02.040
<v Speaker 1>And and I think that they feel like based on

0:16:02.160 --> 0:16:05.400
<v Speaker 1>what they saw during the Obama administration and how much

0:16:06.000 --> 0:16:09.200
<v Speaker 1>Obama was tied up with trying to go with after

0:16:09.280 --> 0:16:12.080
<v Speaker 1>Republicans and WU Republicans who didn't really want to work

0:16:12.080 --> 0:16:14.840
<v Speaker 1>with him. I think that the Biden administration learned some

0:16:15.000 --> 0:16:17.240
<v Speaker 1>lessons and felt like they had to go another way

0:16:17.720 --> 0:16:19.400
<v Speaker 1>and it was a gamble, but it worked for the

0:16:19.440 --> 0:16:21.360
<v Speaker 1>COVID relief bill, and I think they're going to try

0:16:21.400 --> 0:16:24.280
<v Speaker 1>the same thing with these next two packages. So enter

0:16:24.320 --> 0:16:28.880
<v Speaker 1>two and that's when you know, the mid terms are

0:16:29.240 --> 0:16:32.480
<v Speaker 1>and I'm wondering how the ambitious goals of the Biden

0:16:32.480 --> 0:16:36.640
<v Speaker 1>administration has right now I have to get done before

0:16:37.760 --> 0:16:42.480
<v Speaker 1>and how that can change the landscape in Washington. Well, really,

0:16:42.520 --> 0:16:46.240
<v Speaker 1>they feel like they, you know, the midterm elections, the

0:16:46.280 --> 0:16:49.360
<v Speaker 1>party in power typically loses, and so I think the

0:16:49.400 --> 0:16:51.520
<v Speaker 1>White House is very focused on the mid terms and

0:16:51.560 --> 0:16:53.280
<v Speaker 1>they feel like, you know, they have a window of

0:16:53.360 --> 0:16:55.760
<v Speaker 1>time to try to get these major things done and

0:16:55.800 --> 0:16:57.920
<v Speaker 1>they're going to go for it. And I think so

0:16:58.000 --> 0:17:00.400
<v Speaker 1>much of the argument heading into the mid terms for

0:17:00.440 --> 0:17:02.880
<v Speaker 1>the Biden administration is going to be an economic one.

0:17:03.400 --> 0:17:06.120
<v Speaker 1>Are you better off financially than you were two years ago?

0:17:06.440 --> 0:17:08.920
<v Speaker 1>You know, are you making more money? Um? Is the

0:17:09.000 --> 0:17:12.080
<v Speaker 1>stock market in a good place where the kids schools reopening?

0:17:12.480 --> 0:17:14.880
<v Speaker 1>Are there more people in the middle class, and so

0:17:15.359 --> 0:17:18.240
<v Speaker 1>it's really it's interesting because it's a it's an area

0:17:18.240 --> 0:17:23.439
<v Speaker 1>where Republicans have so dominated. Typically Republican politicians get higher

0:17:23.480 --> 0:17:26.160
<v Speaker 1>polling for their handling of the economy. But what we've

0:17:26.160 --> 0:17:28.880
<v Speaker 1>seen in recent polling is Biden is getting very high

0:17:28.960 --> 0:17:31.520
<v Speaker 1>marks for a handling the economy, and so so much

0:17:31.520 --> 0:17:33.879
<v Speaker 1>of that political argument in two is going to be

0:17:33.880 --> 0:17:37.720
<v Speaker 1>around that. Nancy, what about though taxes and higher corporate

0:17:37.760 --> 0:17:41.200
<v Speaker 1>taxes are capital gains taxes, which obviously are skewed towards

0:17:41.280 --> 0:17:44.320
<v Speaker 1>the wealthy and corporations. But I do wonder how that

0:17:44.400 --> 0:17:47.199
<v Speaker 1>might impact you know, you need to pay for what

0:17:47.280 --> 0:17:49.520
<v Speaker 1>he's trying to do, I get that right, But I

0:17:49.520 --> 0:17:51.879
<v Speaker 1>mean I do wonder how that might impact something like

0:17:51.960 --> 0:17:55.280
<v Speaker 1>the mid terms. Ultimately, well, I think it, you know,

0:17:55.359 --> 0:17:58.359
<v Speaker 1>depends what they can pass through corporus. Um. You know that.

0:17:58.520 --> 0:18:00.959
<v Speaker 1>That's why I feel like the by An administration is

0:18:00.960 --> 0:18:03.399
<v Speaker 1>thinking big and proposing what they want and then what

0:18:03.560 --> 0:18:07.000
<v Speaker 1>asked to Congress is like a whole other reality check,

0:18:07.520 --> 0:18:11.840
<v Speaker 1>but also raising taxes on corporations and wealthy people. Right now,

0:18:12.000 --> 0:18:14.680
<v Speaker 1>polls really well, I think that there's a feeling during

0:18:14.720 --> 0:18:18.719
<v Speaker 1>the pandemic that wealthy people worked from home, you know,

0:18:18.760 --> 0:18:22.280
<v Speaker 1>they held onto their houses. They sort of they managed

0:18:22.320 --> 0:18:24.720
<v Speaker 1>to ride it and they were okay, whereas a lot

0:18:24.760 --> 0:18:27.680
<v Speaker 1>of other frontline workers, you know, we're put in dangerous

0:18:27.680 --> 0:18:30.200
<v Speaker 1>positions having to go to work or lost their jobs.

0:18:30.240 --> 0:18:34.360
<v Speaker 1>And so the idea of, like in polling, raising taxes

0:18:34.400 --> 0:18:38.760
<v Speaker 1>on corporations and wealthy people is is overwhelmingly popular now

0:18:38.840 --> 0:18:40.959
<v Speaker 1>and I think the Biden administration is trying to take

0:18:41.000 --> 0:18:43.280
<v Speaker 1>advantage of that. What's the key metric for us to

0:18:43.359 --> 0:18:45.760
<v Speaker 1>keep an eye on when we're thinking about the President

0:18:45.840 --> 0:18:49.720
<v Speaker 1>Biden's effectiveness as a leader? Right, I mean, public polling

0:18:49.760 --> 0:18:54.159
<v Speaker 1>is important, certainly, but but what do you look for? Well,

0:18:54.200 --> 0:18:56.239
<v Speaker 1>I think that some of the key metrics when I

0:18:56.280 --> 0:19:00.560
<v Speaker 1>talk to administration officials, like the things that they're watching are, um,

0:19:00.560 --> 0:19:03.800
<v Speaker 1>what does the unemployment rate look like in two years? Um?

0:19:03.800 --> 0:19:07.000
<v Speaker 1>You know, what does the GDP look like? Um? You know?

0:19:07.040 --> 0:19:09.919
<v Speaker 1>These are what is when how soon does the country

0:19:09.960 --> 0:19:13.359
<v Speaker 1>get back to full employment? When does the unemployment rate go? Um,

0:19:13.400 --> 0:19:16.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, down to the fours again? And I think

0:19:16.160 --> 0:19:18.520
<v Speaker 1>that that is something Those are some of the benchmarks

0:19:18.520 --> 0:19:21.000
<v Speaker 1>that they're looking for in addition to just trying to

0:19:21.040 --> 0:19:23.479
<v Speaker 1>control the corona very briefly, what a targy sectory, yell

0:19:23.560 --> 0:19:26.680
<v Speaker 1>and tell you about that. I think that she is

0:19:26.720 --> 0:19:30.359
<v Speaker 1>closely watching the labor market. Okay, yeah, that's what she

0:19:30.440 --> 0:19:32.680
<v Speaker 1>likes to do. Nancy Cook, thank you so much, White

0:19:32.720 --> 0:19:40.600
<v Speaker 1>House reporter at Bloomberg newsroom, Morow Journal. Yeah, but you

0:19:40.680 --> 0:19:45.680
<v Speaker 1>let me drive. Oh no, no, no no, no, please, I'll

0:19:45.720 --> 0:19:55.440
<v Speaker 1>do le. I want to drive. Just drive, baby, it's

0:19:55.480 --> 0:20:05.040
<v Speaker 1>the questions. Get drying. This is the drive to the

0:20:05.040 --> 0:20:09.760
<v Speaker 1>globe community. Thanks, we'll try us down on Bloomberg Radio.

0:20:10.440 --> 0:20:13.080
<v Speaker 1>Is indeed just about ten minutes not and a half,

0:20:13.160 --> 0:20:16.199
<v Speaker 1>to be exact, left in today's trading session. Let's get

0:20:16.200 --> 0:20:18.560
<v Speaker 1>to the drive to the clothes. Aaron Kennon is back

0:20:18.600 --> 0:20:21.119
<v Speaker 1>with US co founder and chief executive officer Clear Harbord

0:20:21.119 --> 0:20:25.320
<v Speaker 1>Asset Management one billion dollars in assets under management, back

0:20:25.359 --> 0:20:28.640
<v Speaker 1>with us on the phone in Stanford, Connecticut. Aaron, nice

0:20:28.720 --> 0:20:30.800
<v Speaker 1>to have you here. A lot going on. I gotta

0:20:30.880 --> 0:20:35.200
<v Speaker 1>ask you though, first not market related, but Harvard working.

0:20:35.280 --> 0:20:38.440
<v Speaker 1>How's it going? Because I still remember when you said

0:20:38.880 --> 0:20:41.440
<v Speaker 1>we pulled our people, close our offices out of New York.

0:20:41.520 --> 0:20:44.680
<v Speaker 1>We're going to kind of embrace hybrid and work that way,

0:20:45.040 --> 0:20:48.200
<v Speaker 1>you're still doing that? How's it going? So we opened

0:20:48.280 --> 0:20:51.800
<v Speaker 1>up our new headquarters in Stamford back in in July,

0:20:52.160 --> 0:20:55.600
<v Speaker 1>and we've been rotating UM in and out ever since then,

0:20:55.720 --> 0:20:59.879
<v Speaker 1>Carol Um, So we were sort of normalizing. Now. I

0:21:00.040 --> 0:21:02.760
<v Speaker 1>men every day and really look look forward to seeing

0:21:02.800 --> 0:21:05.119
<v Speaker 1>my colleagues in the office. We do wear masks when

0:21:05.160 --> 0:21:08.479
<v Speaker 1>we're out of our individual offices, but certainly feel as

0:21:08.520 --> 0:21:11.879
<v Speaker 1>though the collaborative environment's adding value. Well, I gotta cut

0:21:11.960 --> 0:21:13.280
<v Speaker 1>right to the chase here and get to the big

0:21:13.359 --> 0:21:17.280
<v Speaker 1>news today that Bloomberg and a Boomberg colleagues broke. It's okay,

0:21:17.960 --> 0:21:20.800
<v Speaker 1>the president eyeing a capital gains taxes high as forty

0:21:20.840 --> 0:21:23.399
<v Speaker 1>three point four percent for the wealthy. As soon as

0:21:23.480 --> 0:21:25.720
<v Speaker 1>that happened, stocks moved lower. Well, as soon as the

0:21:25.760 --> 0:21:28.320
<v Speaker 1>news report came out, stocks moved lower on the news. Um.

0:21:28.480 --> 0:21:32.040
<v Speaker 1>Your initial reaction to this right, well, you know, I

0:21:32.359 --> 0:21:35.920
<v Speaker 1>think as a political calculus, it could make good sense

0:21:36.119 --> 0:21:39.520
<v Speaker 1>for you know, occurring favor with the Democratic base. But

0:21:39.600 --> 0:21:43.520
<v Speaker 1>if the goal is ultimately too increased tax revenue, I

0:21:43.560 --> 0:21:46.440
<v Speaker 1>think it sort of fails miserably. Uh. It's sort of

0:21:46.520 --> 0:21:51.120
<v Speaker 1>counterproductive in so many ways because the wealthy um as

0:21:51.200 --> 0:21:53.240
<v Speaker 1>they do even now, but I think they'll do to

0:21:53.359 --> 0:21:57.240
<v Speaker 1>an either even greater degree, will just allocate more of

0:21:57.320 --> 0:21:59.760
<v Speaker 1>their earnings to non for profits more than earnings to

0:21:59.800 --> 0:22:03.240
<v Speaker 1>do and advised funds UM. I think they'll hold off

0:22:03.440 --> 0:22:06.920
<v Speaker 1>on on making those those capital gains sales because of

0:22:06.960 --> 0:22:10.119
<v Speaker 1>course the tax code allows for stepped up capital gains

0:22:10.400 --> 0:22:13.160
<v Speaker 1>upon death, and so that basis just steps up after

0:22:13.240 --> 0:22:16.280
<v Speaker 1>they're passing anyway, So it just doesn't seem to achieve

0:22:16.320 --> 0:22:19.560
<v Speaker 1>the desired economical and I think it sort of prevents

0:22:19.600 --> 0:22:22.119
<v Speaker 1>the fluidity of capital moving around the system as it

0:22:22.160 --> 0:22:24.920
<v Speaker 1>should in a natural way. I think you could have

0:22:25.920 --> 0:22:30.280
<v Speaker 1>asset prices trading at at at valuations that are uh,

0:22:30.400 --> 0:22:36.080
<v Speaker 1>sort of unhealthy uh and and artificial in some nature

0:22:36.240 --> 0:22:39.760
<v Speaker 1>because there's just sort of a lack of uh an

0:22:39.800 --> 0:22:43.560
<v Speaker 1>ability or willingness to to make sales well. And it's

0:22:43.600 --> 0:22:47.040
<v Speaker 1>interesting too, you know, our Mike McKee talked earlier Aaron,

0:22:47.160 --> 0:22:51.080
<v Speaker 1>and he made reference to when Clinton at present Clinton

0:22:51.160 --> 0:22:54.960
<v Speaker 1>then raised corporate gains a capital gains taxes too, and

0:22:55.040 --> 0:22:57.240
<v Speaker 1>he said, you know, we went into a budget surplus.

0:22:57.600 --> 0:22:59.199
<v Speaker 1>There are lots of things we need to look at

0:22:59.240 --> 0:23:01.640
<v Speaker 1>when we're talking about this. But I mean, is there

0:23:01.680 --> 0:23:03.320
<v Speaker 1>a time in history that you can look back and

0:23:03.480 --> 0:23:05.960
<v Speaker 1>kind of get an idea of what might happen in

0:23:06.200 --> 0:23:08.280
<v Speaker 1>terms of the equity markets as a result of a

0:23:08.359 --> 0:23:11.680
<v Speaker 1>higher capital gains tax. Well, I think you know, you

0:23:11.920 --> 0:23:14.399
<v Speaker 1>end up it's sort of like the corporate tax, right right,

0:23:14.440 --> 0:23:16.439
<v Speaker 1>you know, if you if you start nudging that upward.

0:23:16.520 --> 0:23:19.840
<v Speaker 1>To um, you had your CEO of a Chipotle on

0:23:20.520 --> 0:23:22.720
<v Speaker 1>just a little while ago, and he didn't want to

0:23:22.760 --> 0:23:24.959
<v Speaker 1>say it, but but I think he wanted to say was, well,

0:23:25.000 --> 0:23:28.399
<v Speaker 1>we have we have to raise prices, right, and if

0:23:28.400 --> 0:23:30.200
<v Speaker 1>we're going to maintain our earnings, we have to raise

0:23:30.240 --> 0:23:32.640
<v Speaker 1>our prices. So who has to pay more for burrito?

0:23:33.119 --> 0:23:36.040
<v Speaker 1>It's the consumer. So who's who's kidding who? Right? So

0:23:36.480 --> 0:23:38.520
<v Speaker 1>I think this is sort of the reality. There's a

0:23:38.560 --> 0:23:41.720
<v Speaker 1>lot of politics embedded in this. I will um, I

0:23:42.240 --> 0:23:44.680
<v Speaker 1>will admit that this is probably a first sort of

0:23:44.880 --> 0:23:48.719
<v Speaker 1>shot at at goal for for the Biden administration. They

0:23:48.760 --> 0:23:51.679
<v Speaker 1>know they're probably not going to settle settle at forty

0:23:51.760 --> 0:23:54.720
<v Speaker 1>three point four percent at the high rate of capital gains.

0:23:54.800 --> 0:23:58.080
<v Speaker 1>But but it just doesn't make great economic sense either.

0:23:58.480 --> 0:24:01.960
<v Speaker 1>But you know, the Biden admistry and has some very

0:24:02.040 --> 0:24:05.920
<v Speaker 1>ambitious plans for for the next two years and the

0:24:06.000 --> 0:24:09.919
<v Speaker 1>next four years at beyond. It hopes Um, how how

0:24:10.000 --> 0:24:13.119
<v Speaker 1>does it pay for those? Right, it's already floated, Uh,

0:24:13.359 --> 0:24:15.600
<v Speaker 1>increasing the corporate tax rate. It's something that Di asked

0:24:15.640 --> 0:24:18.680
<v Speaker 1>Brian nicol Cheese, CEO of Chipotle about. But they're gonna

0:24:18.680 --> 0:24:19.879
<v Speaker 1>have to pay for it in other ways too, And

0:24:19.960 --> 0:24:22.080
<v Speaker 1>like you said, politically, this may be a way to

0:24:22.160 --> 0:24:25.919
<v Speaker 1>do it. Yeah, I just don't think the pie expands,

0:24:26.000 --> 0:24:27.720
<v Speaker 1>and I think that's the challenge here. I think the

0:24:27.760 --> 0:24:31.040
<v Speaker 1>pie actually shrinks under this proposal, and so we're asking

0:24:31.119 --> 0:24:32.960
<v Speaker 1>us how do we expand the pie? And I think,

0:24:33.600 --> 0:24:37.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, a stimulative economic policies can can do that.

0:24:38.119 --> 0:24:41.920
<v Speaker 1>On the edges, we are at a in an environment

0:24:42.000 --> 0:24:46.080
<v Speaker 1>where we've spent massive percentage of our GDP on fiscal stimulus,

0:24:46.160 --> 0:24:51.000
<v Speaker 1>and that's certainly going to provide growth, but not sustainable

0:24:51.160 --> 0:24:53.680
<v Speaker 1>sort of growth. I think the secular trend will will

0:24:53.760 --> 0:24:58.720
<v Speaker 1>rear its unfortunate head and perhaps two thousand, twenty four

0:24:58.760 --> 0:25:01.000
<v Speaker 1>and beyond, and then we'll have to contend with the

0:25:01.280 --> 0:25:04.159
<v Speaker 1>massive deficits that we've built up over the last not

0:25:04.320 --> 0:25:07.200
<v Speaker 1>just twelve months. Of course, but last many years, and

0:25:07.520 --> 0:25:10.800
<v Speaker 1>and those headwinds to growth due to the deficits will

0:25:10.840 --> 0:25:13.560
<v Speaker 1>be you know, another point of concern for for the

0:25:13.640 --> 0:25:16.879
<v Speaker 1>economy and for earnings. But for now we're seeing record earnings,

0:25:16.920 --> 0:25:20.800
<v Speaker 1>record growth. We think we'll probably see ten GDP annualized

0:25:20.840 --> 0:25:23.520
<v Speaker 1>GDP growth next quarter, which will probably be a peak

0:25:23.600 --> 0:25:27.120
<v Speaker 1>for the cycle. Um and and Europe will probably start

0:25:27.200 --> 0:25:30.159
<v Speaker 1>to accelerate their growth profile towards the back end of

0:25:30.200 --> 0:25:34.480
<v Speaker 1>this year as the vaccine rollout improves there. And I

0:25:34.520 --> 0:25:36.959
<v Speaker 1>think that's the other story of the moment right now, frankly,

0:25:37.040 --> 0:25:39.879
<v Speaker 1>which is it's not a synchronous growth story globally. You know,

0:25:39.960 --> 0:25:42.240
<v Speaker 1>we walked into the beginning of this year and we thought, well,

0:25:42.920 --> 0:25:45.520
<v Speaker 1>all of the world will have this vaccine rollout at

0:25:45.560 --> 0:25:47.640
<v Speaker 1>the same time, so we're going to see the synchronous growth.

0:25:47.960 --> 0:25:51.200
<v Speaker 1>We're not. And I think that has positive ramifications for

0:25:51.280 --> 0:25:55.280
<v Speaker 1>the inflation story too. That demand side is not occurring

0:25:55.359 --> 0:25:58.240
<v Speaker 1>all at once globally. It's happening here and it will

0:25:58.359 --> 0:26:00.919
<v Speaker 1>roll into Europe and then South America and hopefully India

0:26:01.400 --> 0:26:04.639
<v Speaker 1>after they consort out their vaccine woes. But unfortunate because

0:26:04.720 --> 0:26:07.160
<v Speaker 1>it's we really do need to see the vaccine moving

0:26:07.200 --> 0:26:10.680
<v Speaker 1>more aggressively around. Hey Aaron, though, but so what is

0:26:10.760 --> 0:26:15.040
<v Speaker 1>your take on the infrastructure plan and the plan by

0:26:15.080 --> 0:26:18.880
<v Speaker 1>the Biden administration the president specifically, you know about investing

0:26:19.040 --> 0:26:22.000
<v Speaker 1>in America's future? We see China, do it? I know

0:26:22.440 --> 0:26:25.840
<v Speaker 1>these are two different, very two very different countries. But

0:26:26.000 --> 0:26:28.879
<v Speaker 1>I do wonder as an investor, do we at some

0:26:29.040 --> 0:26:31.480
<v Speaker 1>point need to give companies a break, give a country

0:26:31.520 --> 0:26:34.560
<v Speaker 1>a break to invest in the future, whether it's rebuilding

0:26:34.600 --> 0:26:38.480
<v Speaker 1>the semiconductor industry, whether it's rebuilding you know, alternative energy

0:26:38.640 --> 0:26:42.200
<v Speaker 1>or building alternative energy, you know, should we not be

0:26:42.359 --> 0:26:44.679
<v Speaker 1>providing support for that because that's kind of our future?

0:26:45.840 --> 0:26:48.920
<v Speaker 1>I do think there are some key um The transportation

0:26:49.119 --> 0:26:52.440
<v Speaker 1>component of the infrastructure bill has a great deal of merit,

0:26:52.600 --> 0:26:55.240
<v Speaker 1>right we need we need highway systems, we need bridges,

0:26:55.400 --> 0:26:58.919
<v Speaker 1>we need WiFi, we need five G in this country.

0:26:59.000 --> 0:27:00.959
<v Speaker 1>We need to be able to compete heat. But when

0:27:01.040 --> 0:27:02.960
<v Speaker 1>we're going to compete, we also have to compete on

0:27:03.800 --> 0:27:08.679
<v Speaker 1>a reasonably level playing ground as as it pertains to taxation.

0:27:09.080 --> 0:27:10.760
<v Speaker 1>And I guess that's where I sort of go back to,

0:27:11.320 --> 0:27:13.639
<v Speaker 1>you know, that point. I think if if, if the

0:27:13.720 --> 0:27:18.120
<v Speaker 1>Biden administration's objective is to bring back jobs to America.

0:27:18.640 --> 0:27:20.240
<v Speaker 1>We need to be able to compete with the world

0:27:20.320 --> 0:27:22.920
<v Speaker 1>to do that because not only is money fungible, but

0:27:23.000 --> 0:27:25.119
<v Speaker 1>a lot of these goods and services are fungible to

0:27:25.760 --> 0:27:28.639
<v Speaker 1>and so I think taxation is a critical variable there

0:27:29.080 --> 0:27:32.240
<v Speaker 1>as it pertains to the decarbonization initiative. I think this

0:27:32.440 --> 0:27:35.840
<v Speaker 1>is the future in so many different ways in both

0:27:36.040 --> 0:27:38.399
<v Speaker 1>the United States and around the world, and there are

0:27:38.560 --> 0:27:41.320
<v Speaker 1>huge opportunities. Now I'm putting my investment cap on when

0:27:41.359 --> 0:27:44.800
<v Speaker 1>I say this. There are huge opportunities and tail winds

0:27:44.920 --> 0:27:48.680
<v Speaker 1>that we believe, you know, one can invest in over

0:27:48.760 --> 0:27:51.359
<v Speaker 1>long periods of time, whether it's you know, wind and

0:27:51.480 --> 0:27:55.639
<v Speaker 1>solar or frankliness may sound counterintuitive, but the demand side

0:27:55.840 --> 0:27:59.040
<v Speaker 1>on the on the metals and mining side of the docket,

0:27:59.160 --> 0:28:03.520
<v Speaker 1>where opper demand is going to outstrip supply massively over

0:28:03.560 --> 0:28:07.080
<v Speaker 1>the next several years. We think by five dred to

0:28:08.320 --> 0:28:12.480
<v Speaker 1>based on many different research reports of of late between

0:28:12.560 --> 0:28:14.720
<v Speaker 1>now and two thousand and thirty, and we just do

0:28:14.880 --> 0:28:18.399
<v Speaker 1>not have the supply online. It takes eight years to

0:28:18.440 --> 0:28:22.440
<v Speaker 1>build a mind to and what's important about copper, of course,

0:28:22.560 --> 0:28:26.360
<v Speaker 1>is it's required to build a wind turbine to bring

0:28:26.520 --> 0:28:32.080
<v Speaker 1>solar on board and and to really decarbonizing entire pactrical grid. Hey,

0:28:32.119 --> 0:28:34.159
<v Speaker 1>we gotta run. Always good to check in with you.

0:28:34.440 --> 0:28:37.760
<v Speaker 1>I really appreciate it. Aaron Kennedy's co founder, chief executive

0:28:37.800 --> 0:28:41.600
<v Speaker 1>officer at Clear Harbor Asset Management. Thanks for listening to

0:28:41.640 --> 0:28:45.200
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business Week. Download the podcast on iTunes, SoundCloud, or

0:28:45.240 --> 0:28:47.400
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot com, and you can also listen to our

0:28:47.480 --> 0:28:50.080
<v Speaker 1>radio show at two pm Eastern on Bloomberg Radio or

0:28:50.120 --> 0:28:52.760
<v Speaker 1>watch us on YouTube. Sarch to Bloomberg Global News