WEBVTT - I'm Allowed False Hope You S.O.B.

0:00:01.840 --> 0:00:06.160
<v Speaker 1>Broadcasting live from the Abraham Lincoln Radio Studio the George

0:00:06.200 --> 0:00:10.720
<v Speaker 1>Washington Broadcast Center. Jack Armstrong and Joe Getty arm Strong

0:00:10.800 --> 0:00:24.639
<v Speaker 1>and Gatty and he Armstrong and Getty. You don't know,

0:00:24.680 --> 0:00:26.920
<v Speaker 1>how's it going? Glad you're here. And we mentioned a

0:00:26.960 --> 0:00:27.600
<v Speaker 1>couple of weeks ago.

0:00:27.720 --> 0:00:31.920
<v Speaker 2>October means the Supreme Court's back in session. First Monday

0:00:31.920 --> 0:00:35.319
<v Speaker 2>in October they start back up again. I've already had

0:00:35.360 --> 0:00:38.920
<v Speaker 2>questions about that. We welcome to the studio. Actually in

0:00:38.960 --> 0:00:41.680
<v Speaker 2>the studio, Tim Sanderfer of the Goldwater And so.

0:00:41.760 --> 0:00:44.200
<v Speaker 1>Now I have to admit the only reason I came

0:00:44.240 --> 0:00:46.479
<v Speaker 1>down to the studio was for your life size cardboard

0:00:46.479 --> 0:00:50.360
<v Speaker 1>cutout of Taylor Swift, which we do have. Yeah. No,

0:00:50.479 --> 0:00:51.839
<v Speaker 1>it's great to be back. It's been a long time

0:00:51.880 --> 0:00:53.600
<v Speaker 1>since I've been in here. It's nice to see it.

0:00:54.760 --> 0:00:58.360
<v Speaker 2>Why does the Supreme Court take a break? Why don't

0:00:58.360 --> 0:01:00.480
<v Speaker 2>they work year round? And they had so many cases

0:01:00.520 --> 0:01:03.280
<v Speaker 2>between June and October this year. Why don't they just

0:01:03.280 --> 0:01:05.919
<v Speaker 2>stay in session year around like other people with jobs.

0:01:06.080 --> 0:01:08.880
<v Speaker 1>In one sense, they do. They do sort of work

0:01:08.880 --> 0:01:11.880
<v Speaker 1>all year round because they're always on call for emergency

0:01:11.880 --> 0:01:14.600
<v Speaker 1>cases and things like that. But the term that begins

0:01:14.600 --> 0:01:17.680
<v Speaker 1>in October and ends in late June. Right before the

0:01:17.760 --> 0:01:21.200
<v Speaker 1>July fourth break is when they hear oral arguments and

0:01:21.319 --> 0:01:24.240
<v Speaker 1>issue decisions, and they try to get all of the calendar,

0:01:24.280 --> 0:01:26.080
<v Speaker 1>all the decisions that on the calendar issued by the

0:01:26.160 --> 0:01:29.600
<v Speaker 1>end of that of that session. And most state Supreme

0:01:29.640 --> 0:01:32.480
<v Speaker 1>courts do not do that. The most, like California Supreme

0:01:32.520 --> 0:01:35.959
<v Speaker 1>Court is always in session. But it's just an old tradition.

0:01:36.040 --> 0:01:38.280
<v Speaker 1>I think the justice is like their summer vacation time

0:01:38.280 --> 0:01:41.040
<v Speaker 1>they get to go on these junkets to foreign countries,

0:01:41.160 --> 0:01:43.800
<v Speaker 1>or they teach classes for some law school that hosts

0:01:43.840 --> 0:01:46.120
<v Speaker 1>an event in Spain, and you know, it's kind of

0:01:46.160 --> 0:01:48.680
<v Speaker 1>a just the way they've done things, and you know

0:01:48.720 --> 0:01:50.760
<v Speaker 1>in the law, if they've done things for a long time,

0:01:50.920 --> 0:01:53.920
<v Speaker 1>that becomes legal. Right.

0:01:54.200 --> 0:01:59.680
<v Speaker 2>Interesting, So this particular Supreme Court session, what are cases

0:01:59.680 --> 0:02:01.800
<v Speaker 2>that you're excited about? And as you always point out,

0:02:02.080 --> 0:02:05.400
<v Speaker 2>what cases they decide to take as big as the rulings.

0:02:05.520 --> 0:02:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's right. And because they don't have to hear

0:02:07.840 --> 0:02:10.520
<v Speaker 1>every case, they can choose to take a case or not,

0:02:10.560 --> 0:02:12.200
<v Speaker 1>and in fact, they only take about one percent of

0:02:12.200 --> 0:02:16.040
<v Speaker 1>all the cases that they are asked to decide. Yeah, yeah,

0:02:16.080 --> 0:02:18.519
<v Speaker 1>and fewer every year, really, And how do they vote

0:02:18.520 --> 0:02:20.600
<v Speaker 1>on that? Is that just a majority five for it's

0:02:20.680 --> 0:02:22.959
<v Speaker 1>four justices, so there's nine of them. If four of

0:02:23.000 --> 0:02:24.560
<v Speaker 1>them say they want to hear a case, then they

0:02:24.600 --> 0:02:26.760
<v Speaker 1>go ahead and together the case on the theory that

0:02:26.760 --> 0:02:28.480
<v Speaker 1>you might swing one vote one way or the other.

0:02:28.560 --> 0:02:31.160
<v Speaker 1>But the one good point, the one that really stood

0:02:31.160 --> 0:02:34.800
<v Speaker 1>out just this week is on Monday, the Supreme Court

0:02:34.880 --> 0:02:38.200
<v Speaker 1>said that they want to hear a case, well, a

0:02:38.200 --> 0:02:40.080
<v Speaker 1>few justices said they want to hear a case about

0:02:40.080 --> 0:02:44.119
<v Speaker 1>parental rights, and in particular these cases that are popping

0:02:44.200 --> 0:02:48.600
<v Speaker 1>up all over the country of schools deciding to transition

0:02:48.880 --> 0:02:51.680
<v Speaker 1>a student from male to female or female to male

0:02:52.120 --> 0:02:55.320
<v Speaker 1>and then conceal that information from a parent. And we

0:02:55.360 --> 0:02:57.640
<v Speaker 1>at the Goldwater Institute, in fact, are litigating one of

0:02:57.680 --> 0:03:01.000
<v Speaker 1>these cases. We file the petition the Supreme Court that

0:03:01.080 --> 0:03:04.080
<v Speaker 1>we're waiting for them to decide whether to take this

0:03:04.160 --> 0:03:07.560
<v Speaker 1>case or not. Out of Maine, where a school district

0:03:08.120 --> 0:03:12.600
<v Speaker 1>in Maine decided to take our client's child and give

0:03:12.720 --> 0:03:17.440
<v Speaker 1>this child a a device to restrain her breast so

0:03:17.480 --> 0:03:19.960
<v Speaker 1>that she would look male when putting a shirt on.

0:03:21.160 --> 0:03:25.280
<v Speaker 1>Was a teenager and gave this child two of these

0:03:25.440 --> 0:03:28.560
<v Speaker 1>and then said to the to the child, well, we

0:03:28.639 --> 0:03:30.840
<v Speaker 1>don't we won't tell your parents, and you don't have

0:03:30.880 --> 0:03:35.000
<v Speaker 1>to tell your parents. And then and so this would

0:03:35.160 --> 0:03:37.320
<v Speaker 1>lose my mind. Can you imagine? Can you imagine? These

0:03:37.320 --> 0:03:39.240
<v Speaker 1>are these schools are supposed to be You're supposed to

0:03:39.280 --> 0:03:41.560
<v Speaker 1>be entrusting these schools to take care of your kids

0:03:41.600 --> 0:03:44.760
<v Speaker 1>while teaching them reading, writing, arithmetic, and history, and and

0:03:44.800 --> 0:03:47.320
<v Speaker 1>that's that's what they're supposed to be doing. And instead

0:03:47.360 --> 0:03:49.600
<v Speaker 1>they've taken this very I'm sure they think of it

0:03:49.600 --> 0:03:52.360
<v Speaker 1>as very proactive and protective, but I would call it

0:03:52.400 --> 0:03:58.360
<v Speaker 1>aggressive approach in actively trying to withhold information from parents,

0:03:58.400 --> 0:04:01.200
<v Speaker 1>and the kind of information that is really central to

0:04:01.440 --> 0:04:04.200
<v Speaker 1>a parent raising a child. I mean, psycho sexual development

0:04:04.200 --> 0:04:06.000
<v Speaker 1>of a teenager is something a parent needs to be

0:04:06.040 --> 0:04:09.160
<v Speaker 1>there to help a child through. And the schools are saying, no, no,

0:04:09.520 --> 0:04:11.480
<v Speaker 1>you shouldn't have a say in the matter. And well,

0:04:11.520 --> 0:04:13.560
<v Speaker 1>the U. S. Supreme Court has said in the past

0:04:13.600 --> 0:04:18.200
<v Speaker 1>the parents have a fundamental constitutional right to control the

0:04:18.320 --> 0:04:20.960
<v Speaker 1>education and upbringing of their children. And so we say

0:04:21.000 --> 0:04:23.600
<v Speaker 1>that what the school did violated that constitutional right, and

0:04:23.640 --> 0:04:25.760
<v Speaker 1>we've asked the Supreme Court to take that case. Well,

0:04:25.760 --> 0:04:29.080
<v Speaker 1>what happened on Monday was that Justice as Alito, Thomas,

0:04:29.080 --> 0:04:33.640
<v Speaker 1>and Gorsich issued a dec issued in an order, you know,

0:04:33.800 --> 0:04:36.000
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't a ruling, but issued an order saying we

0:04:36.040 --> 0:04:38.760
<v Speaker 1>would really like to hear a case like this. There

0:04:38.800 --> 0:04:41.560
<v Speaker 1>was another case similar facts to Court decided not to

0:04:41.560 --> 0:04:44.200
<v Speaker 1>take the case, but they said, well, we would like

0:04:44.200 --> 0:04:46.320
<v Speaker 1>to hear a case along these lines. And they're going

0:04:46.360 --> 0:04:50.360
<v Speaker 1>to have to eventually. I mean, as the regulatory state

0:04:50.520 --> 0:04:54.039
<v Speaker 1>expands its control, and as the teachers' unions can expand

0:04:54.080 --> 0:04:56.880
<v Speaker 1>their control, and as the state increasingly things that it

0:04:56.920 --> 0:04:59.200
<v Speaker 1>knows better than you do how to raise your kids,

0:04:59.480 --> 0:05:01.520
<v Speaker 1>you're going to find more and more and more of

0:05:01.560 --> 0:05:04.880
<v Speaker 1>these conflicts. And there has to be a limit, a

0:05:04.920 --> 0:05:07.000
<v Speaker 1>line drawn to protect the rights of parents to raise

0:05:07.040 --> 0:05:07.360
<v Speaker 1>their kids.

0:05:07.400 --> 0:05:09.960
<v Speaker 2>And if the Supreme Court decides that now you can't

0:05:10.000 --> 0:05:11.720
<v Speaker 2>do they can't keep that sort of stuff secret from

0:05:11.760 --> 0:05:15.159
<v Speaker 2>the parents, Will that have tentacles beyond just try and stuff.

0:05:15.360 --> 0:05:17.880
<v Speaker 1>Oh oh, definitely it will. And in fact, they've sort

0:05:17.880 --> 0:05:21.800
<v Speaker 1>of already did started doing this. So last term, the

0:05:21.839 --> 0:05:26.360
<v Speaker 1>Court decided a case about schools that were teaching lessons

0:05:26.720 --> 0:05:32.920
<v Speaker 1>to kids about sexuality like same sex, marriages, transsexuals, et cetera,

0:05:32.920 --> 0:05:35.640
<v Speaker 1>et cetera. In and this was very young kids. I

0:05:35.680 --> 0:05:38.680
<v Speaker 1>don't remember exactly, but you know, elementary and pre elementary's

0:05:39.160 --> 0:05:42.200
<v Speaker 1>kids in Virginia. And the question in that case was

0:05:42.320 --> 0:05:45.520
<v Speaker 1>do the parents have a constitutional right to opt their

0:05:45.600 --> 0:05:47.800
<v Speaker 1>kids out to say, I just don't want my kids

0:05:47.800 --> 0:05:50.320
<v Speaker 1>to go through these these lessons? And the Supreme Court

0:05:50.360 --> 0:05:52.720
<v Speaker 1>said yes they do. Now, the reason that you do

0:05:52.760 --> 0:05:55.440
<v Speaker 1>have that constitution right, and the reason that's important is

0:05:55.480 --> 0:05:59.120
<v Speaker 1>because there's been this question among lawyers and judges over

0:05:59.360 --> 0:06:03.279
<v Speaker 1>the level of how far does the parent's right to

0:06:03.440 --> 0:06:06.040
<v Speaker 1>protect and direct the upbringing of a child, How far

0:06:06.080 --> 0:06:09.120
<v Speaker 1>does that extend? Does it stop when you choose what

0:06:09.160 --> 0:06:10.960
<v Speaker 1>school to send your kid to, Because that's what a

0:06:10.960 --> 0:06:13.520
<v Speaker 1>lot of courts have said, a lot like circuit courts

0:06:13.560 --> 0:06:15.480
<v Speaker 1>of appeals have said, well, yes, you have a constitution

0:06:15.600 --> 0:06:17.960
<v Speaker 1>right to control the education of your child, but once

0:06:18.000 --> 0:06:21.160
<v Speaker 1>you've chosen what school to send your kid to, that's

0:06:21.160 --> 0:06:22.920
<v Speaker 1>the end of it. Then it's up to the school

0:06:23.080 --> 0:06:24.760
<v Speaker 1>that you know that the you we can and that

0:06:24.800 --> 0:06:26.440
<v Speaker 1>makes sense because you can't have parents going in there

0:06:26.440 --> 0:06:29.360
<v Speaker 1>and vetoing everything that a public school wants to do

0:06:29.760 --> 0:06:32.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, have a Heckler's veto over the entire curriculum

0:06:32.279 --> 0:06:34.440
<v Speaker 1>of a school. I can see why they're concerned about that,

0:06:34.880 --> 0:06:37.520
<v Speaker 1>but it also it can't be the case that your

0:06:37.520 --> 0:06:39.520
<v Speaker 1>parents your rights as a parent end once you send

0:06:39.560 --> 0:06:41.000
<v Speaker 1>your kid to the public school and then they can

0:06:41.000 --> 0:06:43.240
<v Speaker 1>do whatever they want. And sure enough, in this Virginia case,

0:06:43.240 --> 0:06:45.240
<v Speaker 1>the Supreme Court said, no, a parent's rights do not

0:06:45.400 --> 0:06:48.120
<v Speaker 1>end at the schoolhouse gate. Well, if that's true, then

0:06:48.160 --> 0:06:51.280
<v Speaker 1>that the same applies to these situations where schools are

0:06:51.279 --> 0:06:55.320
<v Speaker 1>concealing vital information from parents about how their kids are developing.

0:06:55.560 --> 0:06:58.320
<v Speaker 2>What's that quote you always have from the early twentieth century,

0:06:58.360 --> 0:06:59.720
<v Speaker 2>Progressive is about schools?

0:06:59.760 --> 0:07:02.839
<v Speaker 1>And oh yeah, well, you know the progressive thought of

0:07:02.880 --> 0:07:07.479
<v Speaker 1>public education as a means of shaping the minds of

0:07:07.480 --> 0:07:11.160
<v Speaker 1>of kids. And Woodrow Woodrow Wilson. Am I living through

0:07:11.160 --> 0:07:14.280
<v Speaker 1>that right now totally? And Woodrow Wilson, who you know,

0:07:14.720 --> 0:07:17.160
<v Speaker 1>he was the only president with a PhD. He was

0:07:17.240 --> 0:07:19.480
<v Speaker 1>like a college president before he became President of the

0:07:19.520 --> 0:07:22.200
<v Speaker 1>United States. He was a leading progressive intellectual. He has

0:07:22.240 --> 0:07:23.880
<v Speaker 1>this speech where he says that the goal of the

0:07:23.920 --> 0:07:26.400
<v Speaker 1>school is to make the child as unlike the parent

0:07:26.480 --> 0:07:30.720
<v Speaker 1>as possible, and that was so great. It's a very

0:07:30.760 --> 0:07:32.760
<v Speaker 1>extreme way of putting it. But you s, what they

0:07:32.840 --> 0:07:35.600
<v Speaker 1>were thinking is, well, they were like, the problems, all

0:07:35.640 --> 0:07:38.480
<v Speaker 1>the tensions and difficulties that we have in America, those

0:07:38.520 --> 0:07:40.559
<v Speaker 1>can be resolved by taking all the kids and putting

0:07:40.600 --> 0:07:42.920
<v Speaker 1>them together and teaching them, you know, how to be

0:07:43.000 --> 0:07:45.360
<v Speaker 1>good citizens. Which maybe that sounds good to you in

0:07:45.400 --> 0:07:47.360
<v Speaker 1>the abstract, but the problem is what do you mean

0:07:47.400 --> 0:07:48.680
<v Speaker 1>by good citizens? All right? Yeah?

0:07:48.680 --> 0:07:53.800
<v Speaker 2>The problem the problem with that, obviously is they have determined,

0:07:54.080 --> 0:07:57.080
<v Speaker 2>we have figured out what is best for all of

0:07:57.400 --> 0:07:59.800
<v Speaker 2>you know, America, and that's what we're going to teach kids.

0:08:00.440 --> 0:08:04.560
<v Speaker 1>And fortunately there are alternatives. There's school choice programs throughout

0:08:04.600 --> 0:08:07.360
<v Speaker 1>the country that parents can take advantage of to get

0:08:07.360 --> 0:08:11.360
<v Speaker 1>their kids into schools that are tailor made or a

0:08:11.400 --> 0:08:14.840
<v Speaker 1>tailor designed for their kids. And especially in my home

0:08:14.840 --> 0:08:18.640
<v Speaker 1>state of Arizona, we have a wonderfully successful program, the

0:08:18.680 --> 0:08:22.760
<v Speaker 1>Empowerment Scholarship Account Program, where a parent can decide what

0:08:22.840 --> 0:08:25.480
<v Speaker 1>schools to send their kids to and get them out

0:08:25.520 --> 0:08:28.920
<v Speaker 1>of failing public schools or public schools that aren't serving

0:08:28.960 --> 0:08:31.320
<v Speaker 1>their kids needs, maybe their kids have special needs or

0:08:31.360 --> 0:08:34.040
<v Speaker 1>that are abusing their power in these ways, and what

0:08:34.080 --> 0:08:36.480
<v Speaker 1>we need is more school choice, more power in the

0:08:36.520 --> 0:08:38.599
<v Speaker 1>hands of parents, and less power in the hands of

0:08:38.640 --> 0:08:41.880
<v Speaker 1>bureaucrats who again think that they know better than you

0:08:41.920 --> 0:08:43.880
<v Speaker 1>do how your kids ought to be raised.

0:08:44.000 --> 0:08:46.800
<v Speaker 2>You and your wife are committed to non child people,

0:08:47.320 --> 0:08:50.439
<v Speaker 2>But it would be so awesome if you had kids,

0:08:50.480 --> 0:08:52.680
<v Speaker 2>just because I can imagine, I mean, because you get

0:08:52.679 --> 0:08:54.920
<v Speaker 2>fired up about this on behalf of other people's kids.

0:08:54.960 --> 0:08:57.720
<v Speaker 1>I can't imagine if your kids. It's a scary thought.

0:08:58.559 --> 0:09:00.000
<v Speaker 1>I had not thought of it till you mentioned that.

0:09:00.080 --> 0:09:02.559
<v Speaker 1>But you're right, I can't imagine. You mean a school

0:09:02.559 --> 0:09:05.640
<v Speaker 1>board meeting. I was, well, I just think about how

0:09:05.679 --> 0:09:07.960
<v Speaker 1>I was when I was in school. I was already

0:09:07.960 --> 0:09:10.720
<v Speaker 1>a kind of a nonconformist when I was forced to

0:09:10.720 --> 0:09:14.079
<v Speaker 1>go to the government schools, and I made life pretty

0:09:14.160 --> 0:09:16.559
<v Speaker 1>pretty hell for my parents my teachers when I was

0:09:16.600 --> 0:09:18.160
<v Speaker 1>in school, So I can imagine what I would do

0:09:18.280 --> 0:09:19.160
<v Speaker 1>if it was my kid.

0:09:19.400 --> 0:09:22.120
<v Speaker 2>Well, I promised to get back to the Supreme Court stuff.

0:09:22.120 --> 0:09:24.880
<v Speaker 2>But tim was helpful to me and my story of

0:09:24.920 --> 0:09:28.920
<v Speaker 2>my son taking a public school American history class and

0:09:28.960 --> 0:09:32.440
<v Speaker 2>on day one having to write a land acknowledgment about

0:09:32.480 --> 0:09:36.640
<v Speaker 2>the tribe that had owned the land board the school.

0:09:36.559 --> 0:09:40.560
<v Speaker 1>Was and how we should all feel so horrible about that?

0:09:41.679 --> 0:09:44.240
<v Speaker 1>Who and that tribe probably stole it from some other tribe,

0:09:44.440 --> 0:09:46.640
<v Speaker 1>and that tribe stole it from some other tribe. I mean,

0:09:47.880 --> 0:09:49.960
<v Speaker 1>I would I just pray for the day when somebody

0:09:50.280 --> 0:09:53.640
<v Speaker 1>requires somebody to do a land acknowledgment for the Commanchee,

0:09:53.960 --> 0:09:58.679
<v Speaker 1>you know, the most aggressive imperial power in Native America

0:09:58.760 --> 0:10:03.720
<v Speaker 1>that just slought or countless other tribes and stole their land.

0:10:03.800 --> 0:10:07.560
<v Speaker 1>And yet now you know, and somebody does this land

0:10:07.640 --> 0:10:09.719
<v Speaker 1>was once possessed by the commanche you know, And I

0:10:09.760 --> 0:10:11.680
<v Speaker 1>would love to see that. Yeah, that's amazing.

0:10:11.880 --> 0:10:14.160
<v Speaker 2>They must not do this in Europe, right, the land acknowledgement,

0:10:14.200 --> 0:10:16.600
<v Speaker 2>because it'd be impossible if you had a square foot

0:10:16.600 --> 0:10:18.319
<v Speaker 2>of France, right or Germany?

0:10:18.320 --> 0:10:20.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, how in the hell would you do This

0:10:20.120 --> 0:10:21.920
<v Speaker 1>land used to belong to Germany and then Russia and

0:10:21.920 --> 0:10:23.800
<v Speaker 1>then Germany and then France and then Germany and then Russia.

0:10:23.840 --> 0:10:29.120
<v Speaker 2>And yeah, it would be very, very complicated. What other

0:10:29.160 --> 0:10:30.800
<v Speaker 2>Supreme Court cases are you excited about this?

0:10:30.920 --> 0:10:34.640
<v Speaker 1>Well, the there's an important gun rights case that's going

0:10:34.760 --> 0:10:37.679
<v Speaker 1>to go up there, and and this case is it's

0:10:38.000 --> 0:10:40.120
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of tough as an intellectual matter, at least

0:10:40.160 --> 0:10:42.720
<v Speaker 1>as I think so. And that is so, the state

0:10:42.720 --> 0:10:45.120
<v Speaker 1>of Hawaii passes a law that says you're not allowed

0:10:45.200 --> 0:10:49.200
<v Speaker 1>to bring a gun onto private property without the express

0:10:49.280 --> 0:10:54.559
<v Speaker 1>permission of the owner. Now, on one hand, that makes

0:10:54.600 --> 0:10:57.200
<v Speaker 1>sense to me, because I wouldn't bring a gun into

0:10:57.240 --> 0:10:59.600
<v Speaker 1>my friend's house without saying, Hey, by the way, I

0:10:59.640 --> 0:11:01.200
<v Speaker 1>have a gun, is it okay with you if I

0:11:01.240 --> 0:11:03.800
<v Speaker 1>bring it into the house. But on the other hand,

0:11:03.880 --> 0:11:06.800
<v Speaker 1>the reason this law has passed was because most people

0:11:06.880 --> 0:11:08.640
<v Speaker 1>are probably not going to put up a sign on

0:11:08.679 --> 0:11:10.360
<v Speaker 1>their houses is it's okay for you to bring a

0:11:10.360 --> 0:11:12.480
<v Speaker 1>gun on this property something? And so it's kind of

0:11:12.480 --> 0:11:15.520
<v Speaker 1>a clever way of preventing people from carrying guns anywhere.

0:11:15.640 --> 0:11:19.240
<v Speaker 1>Oh okay, right. And so the question presented in the

0:11:19.240 --> 0:11:22.400
<v Speaker 1>case is to what level can the state manipulate this

0:11:22.520 --> 0:11:27.360
<v Speaker 1>sort of baseline rule, this the default rule of whether

0:11:27.400 --> 0:11:30.360
<v Speaker 1>you're allowed to with with as long as nobody forbids you,

0:11:30.520 --> 0:11:33.280
<v Speaker 1>or whether you're not allowed to unless you get express permission.

0:11:33.800 --> 0:11:36.000
<v Speaker 2>And that's a tough question. Opt in opt out stuff

0:11:36.000 --> 0:11:38.640
<v Speaker 2>always drives me crazy. Who decides which which it's going

0:11:38.679 --> 0:11:39.240
<v Speaker 2>to be right.

0:11:39.280 --> 0:11:42.000
<v Speaker 1>And so now the court has been pretty good about

0:11:42.040 --> 0:11:46.760
<v Speaker 1>protecting gun rights, but there are some contray examples. There

0:11:46.800 --> 0:11:49.520
<v Speaker 1>have been some cases that where the court has not,

0:11:50.080 --> 0:11:52.439
<v Speaker 1>you know, been as aggressive in protecting these rights as

0:11:52.480 --> 0:11:54.600
<v Speaker 1>I would like. And so I do worry about them

0:11:54.600 --> 0:11:57.280
<v Speaker 1>setting a decision here that's gonna weaken the right to

0:11:57.280 --> 0:11:59.800
<v Speaker 1>possess firearms. But on the other hand, property rights, I

0:11:59.840 --> 0:12:02.080
<v Speaker 1>have a right to decide whether some sure the property

0:12:02.240 --> 0:12:03.400
<v Speaker 1>brings it out of my property or on.

0:12:03.400 --> 0:12:06.120
<v Speaker 2>The course of course, I got questions about that and

0:12:06.160 --> 0:12:07.760
<v Speaker 2>other stuff with Tim sanderf for coming up on and

0:12:07.760 --> 0:12:09.600
<v Speaker 2>tell you about price picks. You know, the NBA season

0:12:09.640 --> 0:12:13.360
<v Speaker 2>is getting underway, obviously, NFL is as hot as it's

0:12:13.400 --> 0:12:16.440
<v Speaker 2>ever been, and playoff Baseball we're headed toward the World

0:12:16.440 --> 0:12:16.880
<v Speaker 2>Series here.

0:12:16.960 --> 0:12:19.440
<v Speaker 1>Soon you can get involved with price picks.

0:12:19.440 --> 0:12:22.319
<v Speaker 2>You got really strong opinions about who's doing well or

0:12:22.360 --> 0:12:23.160
<v Speaker 2>what team's gonna win.

0:12:23.240 --> 0:12:26.560
<v Speaker 1>Turn it into cash with price picks. It's pretty cool.

0:12:26.720 --> 0:12:29.760
<v Speaker 2>Price picks now offers stacks meanings, meaning that you could

0:12:29.800 --> 0:12:31.760
<v Speaker 2>pick the same player up to three times in the

0:12:31.800 --> 0:12:36.000
<v Speaker 2>same lineup. So, for instance, Steph Curry playing basketball, you

0:12:36.040 --> 0:12:38.520
<v Speaker 2>could take zero points three pointers and assists you could

0:12:38.559 --> 0:12:40.400
<v Speaker 2>pick all three of them in the same lineup only

0:12:40.400 --> 0:12:41.880
<v Speaker 2>on Price Picks to make money.

0:12:42.040 --> 0:12:42.640
<v Speaker 1>This is what you do.

0:12:42.720 --> 0:12:44.600
<v Speaker 2>You download the Price Picks up today, use the code

0:12:44.679 --> 0:12:47.320
<v Speaker 2>Armstrong to get fifty dollars in lineups after you play

0:12:47.360 --> 0:12:49.960
<v Speaker 2>your first five dollars lineup. That code is Armstrong to

0:12:49.960 --> 0:12:51.800
<v Speaker 2>get fifty dollars in lineups after you play your first

0:12:51.800 --> 0:12:54.280
<v Speaker 2>five dollars lineup Price Picks. It's good to be right,

0:12:54.679 --> 0:12:56.720
<v Speaker 2>and you can stick around for a little while time. Yeah,

0:12:57.080 --> 0:12:57.839
<v Speaker 2>look forward to that.

0:12:57.960 --> 0:13:04.880
<v Speaker 1>All on the way stay here are Strong and.

0:13:03.000 --> 0:13:05.280
<v Speaker 2>Tim Sander is thankfully committed to sticking around for a

0:13:05.280 --> 0:13:08.280
<v Speaker 2>little while talking about these Supreme Court cases or various

0:13:08.520 --> 0:13:09.240
<v Speaker 2>state cases.

0:13:09.240 --> 0:13:10.120
<v Speaker 1>But we're just discussing.

0:13:10.160 --> 0:13:11.640
<v Speaker 2>One of the reasons I think Tim is a fan

0:13:11.720 --> 0:13:13.920
<v Speaker 2>favorite has been for many years on The Armstrong and

0:13:13.960 --> 0:13:17.160
<v Speaker 2>Getty Show is your ability to explain these complicated cases

0:13:17.200 --> 0:13:20.160
<v Speaker 2>in a way that's normal people like us can understand.

0:13:20.160 --> 0:13:21.920
<v Speaker 1>You know. I think part of the reason for that

0:13:22.160 --> 0:13:25.319
<v Speaker 1>is that I was never a very good student in school,

0:13:25.520 --> 0:13:27.480
<v Speaker 1>and so the teacher would get up there and lecture

0:13:27.480 --> 0:13:29.400
<v Speaker 1>about something I wouldn't get it, so I'd have to

0:13:29.480 --> 0:13:31.800
<v Speaker 1>go out and learn it. Myself, so I would pull

0:13:31.840 --> 0:13:34.000
<v Speaker 1>down the book and read it myself, and that's how

0:13:34.000 --> 0:13:36.080
<v Speaker 1>I got it. And so I know how I learned

0:13:36.080 --> 0:13:38.400
<v Speaker 1>this stuff, and so when I explained it to other people,

0:13:38.440 --> 0:13:40.360
<v Speaker 1>I tell them the way that I figured it out

0:13:40.640 --> 0:13:42.920
<v Speaker 1>as opposed to the way that it's normally talked about

0:13:43.160 --> 0:13:45.319
<v Speaker 1>in other circles. And I think that might be part

0:13:45.360 --> 0:13:48.480
<v Speaker 1>of the reason that is really interesting. Have you ever

0:13:48.520 --> 0:13:50.520
<v Speaker 1>thought about teaching in the law school. I have taught

0:13:50.520 --> 0:13:53.600
<v Speaker 1>a couple classes. I've taught a class at McGeorge and Sacramento.

0:13:53.640 --> 0:13:56.920
<v Speaker 1>I taught a class at George Mason in Virginia. I

0:13:57.080 --> 0:14:00.520
<v Speaker 1>just taught a class two years ago at Arizona State University.

0:14:00.640 --> 0:14:02.680
<v Speaker 1>So I have taught a couple times and all bit

0:14:02.760 --> 0:14:05.080
<v Speaker 1>the students loved it. Well, I don't know, you have

0:14:05.120 --> 0:14:07.040
<v Speaker 1>to ask them, but it was a lot of work.

0:14:07.320 --> 0:14:11.120
<v Speaker 1>That's the thing. I felt sorry for my law professors

0:14:11.120 --> 0:14:13.839
<v Speaker 1>in retrospect because I had not realized when I was

0:14:13.880 --> 0:14:15.600
<v Speaker 1>a student how much work it really is. That you

0:14:15.600 --> 0:14:16.360
<v Speaker 1>have to just do it.

0:14:16.280 --> 0:14:18.319
<v Speaker 2>Once and then you're written, and then you could keep

0:14:18.360 --> 0:14:19.920
<v Speaker 2>doing the same spiel for the next.

0:14:19.800 --> 0:14:21.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, thirty years. Yeah, I suppose you could, you know,

0:14:21.800 --> 0:14:23.520
<v Speaker 1>just update your outline as you go. That is true.

0:14:23.560 --> 0:14:25.200
<v Speaker 1>But on the other hand, you would think that speaking

0:14:25.200 --> 0:14:27.120
<v Speaker 1>for two hours is twice as hard as speaking for

0:14:27.160 --> 0:14:29.440
<v Speaker 1>one hour, and actually it's like fifty times. How I

0:14:29.440 --> 0:14:32.560
<v Speaker 1>want speaking for an hour. It's keeping the students' attention

0:14:32.640 --> 0:14:34.840
<v Speaker 1>and not being boring. That's the thing I just dread

0:14:34.920 --> 0:14:35.480
<v Speaker 1>being boring.

0:14:35.600 --> 0:14:38.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, yeah, tell me about it. We call that

0:14:38.840 --> 0:14:42.360
<v Speaker 2>flop sweat in radio business, when you start feeling, Okay,

0:14:42.440 --> 0:14:46.720
<v Speaker 2>this is not working. So how did vaping become a

0:14:46.760 --> 0:14:47.240
<v Speaker 2>court case?

0:14:47.800 --> 0:14:49.600
<v Speaker 1>Look at? So? One of the things that makes the

0:14:49.640 --> 0:14:52.360
<v Speaker 1>Goldwater Institute where I work, unique is that we try

0:14:52.400 --> 0:14:55.440
<v Speaker 1>to focus on state constitutions, on the rights that are

0:14:55.440 --> 0:14:57.560
<v Speaker 1>protected by your state constitution, which a lot of people

0:14:57.560 --> 0:14:59.320
<v Speaker 1>forget about. They'll talk about the Bill of Rights and

0:14:59.320 --> 0:15:01.960
<v Speaker 1>they forget about the fact that your state constitution protects

0:15:02.000 --> 0:15:05.680
<v Speaker 1>more rights typically than does the federal Constitution. So we

0:15:06.080 --> 0:15:08.400
<v Speaker 1>like to go to state supreme courts to defend state

0:15:08.520 --> 0:15:11.240
<v Speaker 1>constitutional rights. And we have a case pending in the

0:15:11.240 --> 0:15:13.200
<v Speaker 1>Oregon Supreme Court. In fact, it was just argued a

0:15:13.240 --> 0:15:16.800
<v Speaker 1>couple of days ago about the freedom of speech under

0:15:16.840 --> 0:15:19.160
<v Speaker 1>the state constitution, and it involves a state law that

0:15:19.200 --> 0:15:23.920
<v Speaker 1>makes it illegal to package vaping products in a manner

0:15:23.960 --> 0:15:27.640
<v Speaker 1>that quote might be attractive to miners end quote. And

0:15:27.800 --> 0:15:30.880
<v Speaker 1>that term whatever might be attractive to miners is determined

0:15:30.880 --> 0:15:33.200
<v Speaker 1>by a government bureaucracy, because you know, a whole bunch

0:15:33.240 --> 0:15:35.920
<v Speaker 1>of middle aged bureaucrats and a government entity. They really

0:15:36.160 --> 0:15:38.800
<v Speaker 1>have their fingers on the pulse of youthful America.

0:15:38.920 --> 0:15:39.080
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:15:39.720 --> 0:15:41.880
<v Speaker 1>And so we say this violates freedom of speech. Our

0:15:41.920 --> 0:15:44.400
<v Speaker 1>client runs a vaping shop. Kids aren't even allowed in

0:15:44.440 --> 0:15:47.600
<v Speaker 1>his shop. Nevertheless, under this law, he cannot even put

0:15:47.600 --> 0:15:50.280
<v Speaker 1>a picture of a cherry on a box full of

0:15:50.360 --> 0:15:52.680
<v Speaker 1>cherry flavored vaping liquid. The state has said that that

0:15:52.880 --> 0:15:56.480
<v Speaker 1>is illegal. Well, that obviously violates your freedom of speech.

0:15:56.680 --> 0:15:59.840
<v Speaker 2>Right, and it could be you know, you could just

0:16:00.040 --> 0:16:01.720
<v Speaker 2>trapolate that to so many other things.

0:16:02.720 --> 0:16:05.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, you can't put you can't say what, you can't

0:16:05.280 --> 0:16:07.840
<v Speaker 1>say a truthful message about what's in the contents of

0:16:07.880 --> 0:16:11.080
<v Speaker 1>a package. And if this isn't even I mean, if

0:16:11.080 --> 0:16:13.440
<v Speaker 1>the if the constitution doesn't protect your right to speak

0:16:13.480 --> 0:16:16.480
<v Speaker 1>the truth, you've got some real problems there, right. And

0:16:16.560 --> 0:16:19.040
<v Speaker 1>the bureaucracy there when they when we sued they can't,

0:16:19.080 --> 0:16:20.640
<v Speaker 1>they came back and said, well, you you're not allowed

0:16:20.640 --> 0:16:23.840
<v Speaker 1>to sue yet because we haven't written the regulations. We

0:16:23.920 --> 0:16:26.880
<v Speaker 1>haven't told you yet what is attractive to minors, which

0:16:26.960 --> 0:16:32.040
<v Speaker 1>is just that's crazy. I mean, the idea that bureau

0:16:32.200 --> 0:16:34.720
<v Speaker 1>bureaucrats can be empowered to decide what speech you are

0:16:34.760 --> 0:16:38.840
<v Speaker 1>and aren't allowed to express, and then that you're not

0:16:38.880 --> 0:16:41.360
<v Speaker 1>allowed to challenge it until they write the rules is wild.

0:16:41.440 --> 0:16:43.720
<v Speaker 1>So we went up to the Oregon Supreme Court just

0:16:43.760 --> 0:16:46.400
<v Speaker 1>a few days ago and one of my colleagues, John Thorpe,

0:16:46.440 --> 0:16:48.360
<v Speaker 1>argued that case and it went pretty well. I think,

0:16:48.520 --> 0:16:51.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, I got my fingers crossed about that case. Cool.

0:16:52.560 --> 0:16:58.320
<v Speaker 2>Would people like you I others who like smaller government,

0:16:58.360 --> 0:17:05.560
<v Speaker 2>would we rather were living under more state constitution rules

0:17:05.600 --> 0:17:07.159
<v Speaker 2>than federal constitution rules?

0:17:07.200 --> 0:17:09.239
<v Speaker 1>In some ways yes, and in some ways no. So

0:17:09.520 --> 0:17:12.000
<v Speaker 1>it is true that state constitutions tend to protect freedom

0:17:12.040 --> 0:17:15.600
<v Speaker 1>more broadly than the federal Constitution does. But you can't

0:17:15.880 --> 0:17:17.960
<v Speaker 1>just leave it to the states. We have to have

0:17:18.000 --> 0:17:21.720
<v Speaker 1>that federal protection against states. So think the Fourteenth amendmentant

0:17:21.760 --> 0:17:24.600
<v Speaker 1>that prevents the state from violating your federal constitutional rights

0:17:24.920 --> 0:17:27.800
<v Speaker 1>is crucial in protecting that. But for the most part,

0:17:27.800 --> 0:17:29.720
<v Speaker 1>of course, these decisions should mostly be made at the

0:17:29.720 --> 0:17:33.080
<v Speaker 1>state level. Political decisions generally, and constitutional rights should be

0:17:33.119 --> 0:17:36.439
<v Speaker 1>understood mostly at the state level because state judges, for

0:17:36.520 --> 0:17:38.679
<v Speaker 1>one thing, they typically are either elected or we have

0:17:38.680 --> 0:17:40.960
<v Speaker 1>retention elections, so you have more control over them, and

0:17:41.040 --> 0:17:43.560
<v Speaker 1>they're more attuned to the history and culture of that state,

0:17:43.600 --> 0:17:45.320
<v Speaker 1>and they know what the constitution means.

0:17:45.359 --> 0:17:46.760
<v Speaker 2>I have more questions about that, and we're going to

0:17:46.760 --> 0:17:50.280
<v Speaker 2>talk about more Supreme Court cases coming up with Tim Sandfer,

0:17:50.320 --> 0:17:53.520
<v Speaker 2>who works with the Goldwater Institute and has been a

0:17:53.560 --> 0:17:55.320
<v Speaker 2>fan favored of the Armstrong and Getty Show.

0:17:55.119 --> 0:17:57.440
<v Speaker 1>For how many years? Oh, it's been at least a decade.

0:17:57.119 --> 0:18:00.880
<v Speaker 2>No longer than that. Yeah, Yeah, we've been doing this. Yeah,

0:18:01.200 --> 0:18:03.080
<v Speaker 2>so it's sad to think about.

0:18:03.119 --> 0:18:04.760
<v Speaker 1>Really. So we got a lot on the way.

0:18:04.760 --> 0:18:05.920
<v Speaker 2>I hope you can stay with us if you missed

0:18:05.920 --> 0:18:08.119
<v Speaker 2>a segment or now we get the podcast Armstrong and

0:18:08.240 --> 0:18:09.680
<v Speaker 2>Getty on demand.

0:18:10.119 --> 0:18:17.720
<v Speaker 1>Stay with us Armstrong and Getty. We're talking with Tim

0:18:17.760 --> 0:18:19.360
<v Speaker 1>Sander of the Goldwater Institute.

0:18:19.400 --> 0:18:21.440
<v Speaker 2>Anything nice you want to say about Goldwater Institute before

0:18:21.440 --> 0:18:22.480
<v Speaker 2>I start asking you questions.

0:18:22.520 --> 0:18:26.280
<v Speaker 1>We're a nonprofit organization devoted to protecting individual rights in

0:18:27.119 --> 0:18:31.280
<v Speaker 1>courts and in legislatures. Across the country. We're defending your

0:18:31.400 --> 0:18:35.359
<v Speaker 1>right to Our greatest achievement really is Right to Try,

0:18:35.440 --> 0:18:37.840
<v Speaker 1>which is a legislation that was signed by President Trump

0:18:37.840 --> 0:18:40.399
<v Speaker 1>in his previous term that protects your right if you

0:18:40.440 --> 0:18:43.320
<v Speaker 1>are a terminally ill patient to access medicine that has

0:18:43.359 --> 0:18:46.040
<v Speaker 1>been approved for safety but not yet fully approved for

0:18:46.080 --> 0:18:49.520
<v Speaker 1>sale by the FDA. And now we're branching out into

0:18:49.600 --> 0:18:51.520
<v Speaker 1>Right to Try two point zero, which is an effort

0:18:51.560 --> 0:18:54.679
<v Speaker 1>to legally protect your right to access tailor made medical

0:18:54.720 --> 0:18:56.359
<v Speaker 1>treatment that's designed just for you.

0:18:56.480 --> 0:18:58.679
<v Speaker 2>I'm glad you guys did that. It's insane that it

0:18:58.720 --> 0:19:01.679
<v Speaker 2>wasn't already the case. I mean, it's just close my mind.

0:19:01.760 --> 0:19:03.560
<v Speaker 2>For years that we've been talking about this.

0:19:03.440 --> 0:19:04.919
<v Speaker 1>It really is. Well. We were just talking about how

0:19:04.960 --> 0:19:07.440
<v Speaker 1>bureaucrats think they know better than you do about how

0:19:07.440 --> 0:19:09.520
<v Speaker 1>to raise your kids. A lot of the time, bureaucrats

0:19:09.560 --> 0:19:11.959
<v Speaker 1>think they know better than you do what medicines you

0:19:12.000 --> 0:19:15.560
<v Speaker 1>ought to be allowed to even choose from, even when

0:19:15.760 --> 0:19:18.240
<v Speaker 1>you're a patient with a terminal illness that can't be

0:19:18.280 --> 0:19:21.359
<v Speaker 1>cured anyway, and you there's an opportunity to take this

0:19:21.760 --> 0:19:24.959
<v Speaker 1>investigational medicine that might improve things for you, and then

0:19:25.080 --> 0:19:26.840
<v Speaker 1>some bureaucrat comes in and says, no, no, we're not.

0:19:27.200 --> 0:19:27.840
<v Speaker 1>You can't do that.

0:19:27.960 --> 0:19:30.000
<v Speaker 2>One of my favorite phrases from that whole thing was

0:19:30.040 --> 0:19:31.880
<v Speaker 2>you might give them false.

0:19:31.560 --> 0:19:34.040
<v Speaker 1>Hope, false hope. That's right. Well, no hope is false.

0:19:34.160 --> 0:19:38.320
<v Speaker 2>How about I'm allowed to, in my final days alive

0:19:38.359 --> 0:19:40.800
<v Speaker 2>as a human being, to have some false hope, you

0:19:40.960 --> 0:19:41.639
<v Speaker 2>son of a bitch.

0:19:41.720 --> 0:19:46.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, right, and some and some authority over my own decision.

0:19:47.040 --> 0:19:47.760
<v Speaker 1>That's crazy.

0:19:48.600 --> 0:19:51.359
<v Speaker 2>How before we get to a specific case, how left

0:19:51.440 --> 0:19:54.040
<v Speaker 2>are law schools in general across the country.

0:19:54.080 --> 0:19:58.120
<v Speaker 1>They are so much worse than you could possibly imagine

0:19:58.840 --> 0:20:04.639
<v Speaker 1>the entire legal is right. Well, there's a number of

0:20:04.720 --> 0:20:06.959
<v Speaker 1>historical reasons, I'm sure. I mean, part of it, I

0:20:07.000 --> 0:20:10.240
<v Speaker 1>think is the romanticism of the sixties, you know, the

0:20:10.320 --> 0:20:14.240
<v Speaker 1>hero the heroism of Brown versus Board of Education that

0:20:14.359 --> 0:20:17.720
<v Speaker 1>then spread after that into this notion that the civil

0:20:17.840 --> 0:20:22.240
<v Speaker 1>rights lawyers were the champions of social justice and so forth.

0:20:22.280 --> 0:20:24.680
<v Speaker 1>And that was part of it, even though even when

0:20:24.680 --> 0:20:27.480
<v Speaker 1>that got sidetracked into these crazy left wing notions that

0:20:27.520 --> 0:20:29.639
<v Speaker 1>have nothing to do with justice. But I think the

0:20:29.640 --> 0:20:33.440
<v Speaker 1>biggest problem is the very phrase social justice. Law schools

0:20:33.560 --> 0:20:37.679
<v Speaker 1>are not very good on philosophy, and they teach a

0:20:37.720 --> 0:20:40.680
<v Speaker 1>corrupted notion of what justice means. They think a lot

0:20:40.680 --> 0:20:44.800
<v Speaker 1>of people think justice means equality. Justice does not mean equality.

0:20:44.920 --> 0:20:47.520
<v Speaker 1>Justice and equality, in fact, have very little to do

0:20:47.600 --> 0:20:51.439
<v Speaker 1>with one another. Justice means ensuring that every person gets

0:20:51.640 --> 0:20:55.280
<v Speaker 1>what is his or her own, and equality is about

0:20:55.320 --> 0:20:59.040
<v Speaker 1>distributing to things to people according to some set formula.

0:20:59.320 --> 0:21:01.960
<v Speaker 1>And so justice inequality of very different things. But nobody

0:21:02.040 --> 0:21:03.919
<v Speaker 1>talks about this in law school, and so people emerge

0:21:03.960 --> 0:21:07.199
<v Speaker 1>from law school thinking they're deeply educated with these perverse

0:21:07.280 --> 0:21:09.399
<v Speaker 1>notions about what justice even means to begin with.

0:21:09.520 --> 0:21:14.560
<v Speaker 2>So if the legal education system in this country is

0:21:14.600 --> 0:21:16.119
<v Speaker 2>way left, what is the result of that.

0:21:16.160 --> 0:21:18.360
<v Speaker 1>Do we turn out a whole bunch of left lawyers?

0:21:18.400 --> 0:21:18.720
<v Speaker 3>We do.

0:21:18.960 --> 0:21:21.680
<v Speaker 1>We have tons and tons of left lawyers and left

0:21:21.720 --> 0:21:25.560
<v Speaker 1>judges who often, I think, have never seriously even considered

0:21:25.560 --> 0:21:29.000
<v Speaker 1>the alternative. And so they've been kind of gobsmacked by

0:21:29.280 --> 0:21:33.480
<v Speaker 1>the rise of the federalist society and the backlash against

0:21:34.960 --> 0:21:38.199
<v Speaker 1>what we lawyers call the New Deal Settlement, that the

0:21:38.280 --> 0:21:40.560
<v Speaker 1>way that constitutional law has been interpreted since the nineteen

0:21:40.600 --> 0:21:43.280
<v Speaker 1>thirties or so. There's been this effort to push back

0:21:43.280 --> 0:21:45.439
<v Speaker 1>against that, and I think It really surprised a lot

0:21:45.520 --> 0:21:49.040
<v Speaker 1>of legal intellectuals. Lawrence Tribe, who you know, very famous

0:21:49.119 --> 0:21:52.520
<v Speaker 1>law professor, refused even to publish the second volume of

0:21:52.520 --> 0:21:54.440
<v Speaker 1>his treatise on Constitutional Law because he said he no

0:21:54.520 --> 0:21:58.600
<v Speaker 1>longer understood constitutional law. Well good, because the constitutional law

0:21:58.640 --> 0:22:01.080
<v Speaker 1>he's been p's in practicing is kakame Ma.

0:22:01.560 --> 0:22:03.959
<v Speaker 2>And then you were talking about Goldwater Institute gets involved

0:22:04.000 --> 0:22:06.560
<v Speaker 2>in state constitutions a lot. What what couple of states

0:22:06.560 --> 0:22:08.119
<v Speaker 2>have the wackiest constitutions?

0:22:08.600 --> 0:22:11.600
<v Speaker 1>Oh? Wow, Well, Montana's is pretty bad. It's written in

0:22:11.600 --> 0:22:14.120
<v Speaker 1>the nineteen seventies and it has all sorts of sort

0:22:14.160 --> 0:22:17.960
<v Speaker 1>of lefty notions in it. But I and Hawaii's my

0:22:18.000 --> 0:22:22.160
<v Speaker 1>favorite thing. Hawaii. Actually the law of the splintered Paddle

0:22:22.280 --> 0:22:25.160
<v Speaker 1>is part of their constitution. Nobody knows what the law

0:22:25.200 --> 0:22:27.960
<v Speaker 1>of the splintered paddle means, but it's an ancient thing

0:22:28.000 --> 0:22:30.679
<v Speaker 1>that dates back to Kamema, so it's in the constitution. Okay,

0:22:31.160 --> 0:22:34.000
<v Speaker 1>But I think the general consensus is that Alabama has

0:22:34.000 --> 0:22:37.439
<v Speaker 1>the worst state constitution. It's been amended so many times

0:22:37.440 --> 0:22:41.480
<v Speaker 1>that it's several hundred pages long, and it has every

0:22:41.840 --> 0:22:45.040
<v Speaker 1>little last detail of state law on embedded in it.

0:22:45.080 --> 0:22:48.000
<v Speaker 1>And it's just too complicated for words. I mean, California

0:22:48.040 --> 0:22:51.240
<v Speaker 1>is pretty lousy. California is a bad has a lowsy constitution,

0:22:51.320 --> 0:22:54.000
<v Speaker 1>but it's not quite that bad. Wow, that is really interesting.

0:22:54.080 --> 0:22:56.040
<v Speaker 2>But the laboratories of democracy, you know, at least we

0:22:56.080 --> 0:22:57.160
<v Speaker 2>get to see how it works out.

0:22:57.320 --> 0:22:59.040
<v Speaker 1>You have a lot of crazy experiments in some of

0:22:59.040 --> 0:23:02.080
<v Speaker 1>those laboratories. I mean, you're experimenting on human beings. But

0:23:02.160 --> 0:23:04.240
<v Speaker 1>that that's consent, right, true.

0:23:04.280 --> 0:23:06.000
<v Speaker 2>You do have the opportunity to leave the state if

0:23:06.040 --> 0:23:10.440
<v Speaker 2>you want to. What other case the Supreme Court's taking

0:23:10.520 --> 0:23:11.640
<v Speaker 2>up your interest to do it? Well.

0:23:11.680 --> 0:23:13.520
<v Speaker 1>Of course, the biggest case on the horizon as far

0:23:13.560 --> 0:23:15.680
<v Speaker 1>as I'm concerned, is the tariff case that we're talking

0:23:15.680 --> 0:23:18.879
<v Speaker 1>about Federal Constitution now and the Federal Supreme Court, and

0:23:18.920 --> 0:23:22.000
<v Speaker 1>that is the constitutionality of President Trump's tariffs, which are

0:23:22.640 --> 0:23:25.080
<v Speaker 1>I know, totally unconstitutional, totally illegal.

0:23:25.240 --> 0:23:29.560
<v Speaker 2>I know nothing about this, but the idea that one guy,

0:23:29.600 --> 0:23:33.040
<v Speaker 2>any guy Trump, or anybody else could make that sort

0:23:33.080 --> 0:23:36.480
<v Speaker 2>of a decision for America in the world just doesn't

0:23:36.520 --> 0:23:38.320
<v Speaker 2>seem on its face correct.

0:23:38.640 --> 0:23:41.480
<v Speaker 1>You would have floored the authors of the Constitution of

0:23:41.520 --> 0:23:44.040
<v Speaker 1>the United States, who had lived through the American Revolution

0:23:44.200 --> 0:23:47.320
<v Speaker 1>and had experienced exactly that and wrote a constitution to

0:23:47.440 --> 0:23:50.480
<v Speaker 1>prohibit exactly that thing from happening. Of a single person

0:23:50.520 --> 0:23:53.199
<v Speaker 1>imposing taxes on the whole nation in the amount that

0:23:53.280 --> 0:23:56.000
<v Speaker 1>he chooses, for whatever reason he wants, for as long

0:23:56.040 --> 0:23:59.640
<v Speaker 1>as he decides that's that's wild. And but I don't

0:23:59.680 --> 0:24:01.639
<v Speaker 1>think that the I'll get to the constitutional issue in

0:24:01.680 --> 0:24:04.879
<v Speaker 1>this case. I think they'll probably decide this on statutory grounds.

0:24:04.920 --> 0:24:07.199
<v Speaker 1>And what I mean by that is the teriffs are

0:24:07.200 --> 0:24:11.000
<v Speaker 1>supposedly in accordance with a statute called AEPA, which stands

0:24:11.000 --> 0:24:14.000
<v Speaker 1>for something I don't remember, and AYIPA does not actually

0:24:14.040 --> 0:24:16.720
<v Speaker 1>allow for tariffs. What it says is that the president

0:24:16.760 --> 0:24:20.120
<v Speaker 1>can in a case in an emergency, the president can

0:24:20.200 --> 0:24:26.800
<v Speaker 1>regulate or seize products from foreign countries in commerce and

0:24:26.840 --> 0:24:30.320
<v Speaker 1>things like that. It's designed to freeze assets and capture

0:24:30.359 --> 0:24:32.720
<v Speaker 1>things so that people aren't sending bad stuff to the

0:24:32.840 --> 0:24:35.879
<v Speaker 1>enemy in wartime and stuff. The statute is not designed

0:24:35.880 --> 0:24:38.840
<v Speaker 1>to allow for these tariffs that are just designed or

0:24:38.880 --> 0:24:41.160
<v Speaker 1>formulated however the president wants. So I think the court

0:24:41.200 --> 0:24:42.720
<v Speaker 1>is going to say that they don't satisfy it. But

0:24:42.760 --> 0:24:45.960
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't they have taken that up like last week, given.

0:24:45.720 --> 0:24:49.000
<v Speaker 2>The fact that I mean we're threatening one hundred percent

0:24:49.040 --> 0:24:52.000
<v Speaker 2>tariffs on everything from China starting November first.

0:24:52.080 --> 0:24:53.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it would be nice if some of these things

0:24:53.720 --> 0:24:56.720
<v Speaker 1>are faster. But to know, in their defense, there's so

0:24:56.840 --> 0:24:59.000
<v Speaker 1>much stuff that's been coming at them, There's so much

0:24:59.040 --> 0:25:01.480
<v Speaker 1>unconstitutional stuff that's been going on that's been thrown at

0:25:01.520 --> 0:25:04.640
<v Speaker 1>their heads. You know, there's only so much time that

0:25:04.040 --> 0:25:07.160
<v Speaker 1>they can resolve these cases, do they.

0:25:08.440 --> 0:25:12.040
<v Speaker 2>I know, sometimes you prioritize things and move them up,

0:25:12.160 --> 0:25:15.040
<v Speaker 2>like you know, deciding on uh, you know, Nixon and

0:25:15.080 --> 0:25:17.320
<v Speaker 2>Watergate and all kinds of things that where you just decide,

0:25:17.480 --> 0:25:18.840
<v Speaker 2>we got to have an emergency session.

0:25:18.880 --> 0:25:20.840
<v Speaker 1>But right in general, you just let it come down,

0:25:21.040 --> 0:25:22.760
<v Speaker 1>like when it comes down the pipe. So here's the thing.

0:25:22.840 --> 0:25:25.919
<v Speaker 1>So the the Feds said, because the plaintiffs in that

0:25:25.960 --> 0:25:27.920
<v Speaker 1>case said, well, you need to resolve this really quickly

0:25:27.920 --> 0:25:30.040
<v Speaker 1>for all the reasons you just said, and the Trump

0:25:30.080 --> 0:25:32.760
<v Speaker 1>administration said, no, no, there's no hurry because we can

0:25:32.840 --> 0:25:36.159
<v Speaker 1>always refund people the taxes if these things are declared

0:25:36.200 --> 0:25:38.960
<v Speaker 1>to league, that wouldn't be complicated at all. And then

0:25:39.440 --> 0:25:41.959
<v Speaker 1>at the same time, the administration is putting out these

0:25:41.960 --> 0:25:43.960
<v Speaker 1>press releases saying, we have to keep these tariffs in

0:25:43.960 --> 0:25:45.919
<v Speaker 1>place because it would be economic chaos if they get

0:25:45.920 --> 0:25:48.119
<v Speaker 1>struck down, because then we'd have to refund everybody's money.

0:25:48.320 --> 0:25:51.399
<v Speaker 1>They were literally saying the opposite thing simultaneously. I know

0:25:51.440 --> 0:25:54.240
<v Speaker 1>that that is ordinary nowadays, but to me that's still

0:25:54.240 --> 0:25:54.800
<v Speaker 1>shock us.

0:25:54.920 --> 0:25:58.920
<v Speaker 2>Lay people don't fully understand that. You know, these things

0:25:58.960 --> 0:26:01.200
<v Speaker 2>have to work their way through courts, through a low

0:26:01.320 --> 0:26:02.720
<v Speaker 2>lower level all the way to the higher level, and

0:26:02.760 --> 0:26:03.960
<v Speaker 2>it takes its time or everything like that.

0:26:04.080 --> 0:26:05.000
<v Speaker 1>But there's so many.

0:26:04.800 --> 0:26:08.440
<v Speaker 2>Examples, like the can a fifteen year old boy participat

0:26:08.440 --> 0:26:09.879
<v Speaker 2>in girls sports in high school?

0:26:10.000 --> 0:26:11.760
<v Speaker 1>It just seems like this is gonna get to the

0:26:11.760 --> 0:26:14.120
<v Speaker 1>Supreme Court. Can we just do it now and decide?

0:26:14.480 --> 0:26:17.119
<v Speaker 2>Or the same thing, can you be a sanctuary city

0:26:17.240 --> 0:26:20.040
<v Speaker 2>and just decide we don't agree, Well, you just decide

0:26:20.040 --> 0:26:20.520
<v Speaker 2>these now.

0:26:20.760 --> 0:26:22.800
<v Speaker 1>Part of the reason I mentioned now the court takes

0:26:22.840 --> 0:26:25.080
<v Speaker 1>only one percent of the cases and fewer every year.

0:26:25.359 --> 0:26:27.000
<v Speaker 1>A part of the thing is I think some of

0:26:27.040 --> 0:26:29.960
<v Speaker 1>the conservative justices have wanted the Supreme Court not to

0:26:30.040 --> 0:26:33.760
<v Speaker 1>decide these questions. They sort of tend to want lower

0:26:33.800 --> 0:26:36.520
<v Speaker 1>courts to resolve these questions. The problem with that is,

0:26:36.560 --> 0:26:38.800
<v Speaker 1>of course, the lower courts disagree with each other sometimes,

0:26:39.040 --> 0:26:42.080
<v Speaker 1>but I think that the Supreme Court sees itself as

0:26:42.160 --> 0:26:45.040
<v Speaker 1>they're worried that they don't because they follow this no

0:26:45.040 --> 0:26:48.280
<v Speaker 1>nonsense idea of a judicial restraint. We don't want unelected

0:26:48.320 --> 0:26:51.240
<v Speaker 1>judges controlling everything, which scares everybody else but doesn't scare me,

0:26:52.480 --> 0:26:55.800
<v Speaker 1>because I'm worried about judges getting things wrong, whether they

0:26:55.800 --> 0:26:58.240
<v Speaker 1>get it wrong by being too active or too passive,

0:26:58.960 --> 0:27:00.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm worried about them getting the wrong. I'm not worried

0:27:00.680 --> 0:27:04.280
<v Speaker 1>about being activists. I'm worried about them being wrong. Those

0:27:04.280 --> 0:27:06.040
<v Speaker 1>are two completely different things. I think it's a very

0:27:06.040 --> 0:27:07.720
<v Speaker 1>bad thing when the Court stands back and says, we're

0:27:07.760 --> 0:27:09.520
<v Speaker 1>not gonna we're not gonna interfere, We're gonna let the

0:27:09.520 --> 0:27:11.000
<v Speaker 1>government violate your rights and we're not going to do

0:27:11.040 --> 0:27:12.840
<v Speaker 1>anything about it, because we don't want to have activist judges.

0:27:12.840 --> 0:27:16.160
<v Speaker 1>I think that's a terrible idea. Anyway. What I think

0:27:16.160 --> 0:27:18.720
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing is that the Supreme Court is trying to

0:27:19.920 --> 0:27:23.320
<v Speaker 1>offload some of its work to these lower courts, and

0:27:23.400 --> 0:27:25.760
<v Speaker 1>so they are taking fewer of those cases and not

0:27:26.080 --> 0:27:29.280
<v Speaker 1>necessarily deciding them as quickly as as otherwise. They just

0:27:29.320 --> 0:27:31.680
<v Speaker 1>don't want to have their fingerprints on it. Yeah, and well,

0:27:31.720 --> 0:27:35.960
<v Speaker 1>because they they buy this notion that unelected judges shouldn't

0:27:35.960 --> 0:27:39.480
<v Speaker 1>have all this power. Okay, and again I of course,

0:27:39.760 --> 0:27:42.760
<v Speaker 1>of course nobody should do things wrong if they're in government.

0:27:42.800 --> 0:27:45.960
<v Speaker 1>But the idea that that judicial activism is a serious

0:27:46.000 --> 0:27:50.480
<v Speaker 1>threat is wildly overbrown, overblown. Congress and the President violate

0:27:50.520 --> 0:27:53.840
<v Speaker 1>your rights on an hourly basis in this country. I'm

0:27:53.920 --> 0:27:56.879
<v Speaker 1>far more worried about them than I am about the courts.

0:27:57.160 --> 0:28:00.080
<v Speaker 1>The courts are so they have very little power or

0:28:00.080 --> 0:28:02.000
<v Speaker 1>all they can do is pronounce what the law is.

0:28:02.520 --> 0:28:06.480
<v Speaker 1>The Congress and the president can resist them very powerfully.

0:28:06.880 --> 0:28:09.560
<v Speaker 1>But when the Congress does stuff and the President does stuff,

0:28:09.560 --> 0:28:11.920
<v Speaker 1>the violate your rights, and the Court folds its hands

0:28:11.960 --> 0:28:13.639
<v Speaker 1>and says, we're not going to do anything about that

0:28:13.680 --> 0:28:15.840
<v Speaker 1>because we don't want to be activist judges. That's a

0:28:15.880 --> 0:28:18.600
<v Speaker 1>breakdown in our constitutional system that was never intended to

0:28:18.640 --> 0:28:19.040
<v Speaker 1>be that way.

0:28:19.560 --> 0:28:24.040
<v Speaker 2>How often, and then, obviously this is a complete opinion,

0:28:24.119 --> 0:28:27.960
<v Speaker 2>a judgment opinion, But how often does the Supreme Court

0:28:28.000 --> 0:28:28.720
<v Speaker 2>make mistakes?

0:28:28.760 --> 0:28:31.359
<v Speaker 1>Do you think, oh, they get it wrong, Yeah, they

0:28:31.400 --> 0:28:36.000
<v Speaker 1>get things wrong very frequently. But oh, nowadays I would

0:28:36.040 --> 0:28:40.479
<v Speaker 1>say I think they get things wrong about Oh, I

0:28:40.560 --> 0:28:42.479
<v Speaker 1>guess forty percent of the time. But I guess it

0:28:42.560 --> 0:28:45.280
<v Speaker 1>depends on whether you mean get things wrong by not

0:28:46.080 --> 0:28:48.000
<v Speaker 1>doing things that I wish they would do, as opposed

0:28:48.040 --> 0:28:49.960
<v Speaker 1>to doing things that I wish they wouldn't do. I mean,

0:28:50.000 --> 0:28:52.200
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of stuff where like I'm, for instance,

0:28:52.200 --> 0:28:54.719
<v Speaker 1>I'm not an originalist. You know. The originalism is this

0:28:54.760 --> 0:28:57.240
<v Speaker 1>big popular trend right now where these judges are like, well,

0:28:57.280 --> 0:28:59.640
<v Speaker 1>what the Founding's fathers thought that the Constitution meant is

0:28:59.640 --> 0:29:01.880
<v Speaker 1>what it'll meant for all time, And that sounds plausible

0:29:01.880 --> 0:29:03.840
<v Speaker 1>at first, but when you get down to it, it's

0:29:03.880 --> 0:29:07.120
<v Speaker 1>just not how language really works. And so you know,

0:29:07.200 --> 0:29:09.400
<v Speaker 1>for that reason, I also find myself disagree with a

0:29:09.440 --> 0:29:11.600
<v Speaker 1>lot of people on my own side. I love Justice Thomas,

0:29:11.680 --> 0:29:13.400
<v Speaker 1>for instance, but I find that I disagree with him

0:29:13.440 --> 0:29:15.960
<v Speaker 1>about a lot of things. I don't think that, you know,

0:29:16.200 --> 0:29:18.720
<v Speaker 1>our constitutional rights should be interpreted in accordance with what

0:29:18.760 --> 0:29:21.000
<v Speaker 1>the Puritans thought when they landed in Massachusetts, and this

0:29:21.000 --> 0:29:23.520
<v Speaker 1>we do you call what you are? I don't know.

0:29:23.640 --> 0:29:26.200
<v Speaker 1>I have to That's the best word that I've been

0:29:26.240 --> 0:29:29.200
<v Speaker 1>able to find for what I am. Okay, yeah, Yeah,

0:29:29.240 --> 0:29:31.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm hoping to figure this out. I have a big

0:29:31.160 --> 0:29:33.640
<v Speaker 1>paper that's coming out later this year that we're all

0:29:33.640 --> 0:29:35.680
<v Speaker 1>talk about this, and maybe that'll help me figure out

0:29:35.680 --> 0:29:36.440
<v Speaker 1>what the title is.

0:29:36.800 --> 0:29:39.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, So on the how often do they get it wrong?

0:29:39.120 --> 0:29:40.880
<v Speaker 2>It reminds me of the like when they do the

0:29:40.960 --> 0:29:43.800
<v Speaker 2>right track wrong track? You know, is the country going

0:29:43.840 --> 0:29:46.160
<v Speaker 2>the right direction wrong direction? And the number's really high, Well,

0:29:46.160 --> 0:29:47.960
<v Speaker 2>half the people want it to be further left, and

0:29:47.960 --> 0:29:49.480
<v Speaker 2>have the people want to be further right, So it

0:29:49.480 --> 0:29:51.240
<v Speaker 2>doesn't really tell you anything that's right.

0:29:51.600 --> 0:29:55.760
<v Speaker 1>That's why the government should have less power over our lives,

0:29:56.080 --> 0:29:58.880
<v Speaker 1>because we don't want those crazy people over there, whoever

0:29:58.880 --> 0:30:00.840
<v Speaker 1>they might be, to control oh what I get to

0:30:00.840 --> 0:30:03.080
<v Speaker 1>do with my life. And that's the whole benefit of

0:30:03.160 --> 0:30:06.280
<v Speaker 1>limited constitutional government is that you get to decide your

0:30:06.320 --> 0:30:08.520
<v Speaker 1>own life in your own way, and other people don't

0:30:08.560 --> 0:30:10.000
<v Speaker 1>get to come in and tell you how to live

0:30:10.040 --> 0:30:13.560
<v Speaker 1>what they think is your proper life. And unfortunately neither

0:30:13.640 --> 0:30:16.000
<v Speaker 1>party today believes in that. Yeah, that's a good point.

0:30:16.000 --> 0:30:18.480
<v Speaker 2>The less the government is involved, the less it matters

0:30:18.520 --> 0:30:19.360
<v Speaker 2>whether they get it right or on.

0:30:19.440 --> 0:30:23.640
<v Speaker 1>Because they're not deciding for me. The people sometimes say, well, yeah,

0:30:24.200 --> 0:30:26.000
<v Speaker 1>I've had this happen to me. But Tim, yeah, you

0:30:26.040 --> 0:30:28.800
<v Speaker 1>believe in freedom, but that's an optimistic view of human nature.

0:30:28.840 --> 0:30:31.040
<v Speaker 1>You think people are good and that they're going to

0:30:31.080 --> 0:30:33.720
<v Speaker 1>do good things with freedom. No, it's exactly the opposite.

0:30:34.080 --> 0:30:36.880
<v Speaker 1>I believe in freedom because I don't trust other people

0:30:37.240 --> 0:30:40.040
<v Speaker 1>to be to make the right decisions from my life.

0:30:40.160 --> 0:30:44.280
<v Speaker 1>I think other people are often ignorant, they're very foolish.

0:30:44.360 --> 0:30:47.280
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes sometimes they're corrupt, they're bribed, they don't know what

0:30:47.320 --> 0:30:50.600
<v Speaker 1>they're doing, and they'll make mistakes. So their mistakes should

0:30:50.600 --> 0:30:52.600
<v Speaker 1>be confined to their own lives. They shouldn't be allowed

0:30:52.600 --> 0:30:55.240
<v Speaker 1>to inflict their mistakes on my life. That's the argument

0:30:55.280 --> 0:30:57.280
<v Speaker 1>for freedom. That's a good point to end on.

0:30:57.440 --> 0:31:00.200
<v Speaker 2>Another excellent point from Tim Sandffer, as he's done where

0:31:00.200 --> 0:31:02.280
<v Speaker 2>we figured it out like twenty years yes on the

0:31:02.360 --> 0:31:04.440
<v Speaker 2>Armstrong and Getty went a year as we all enter

0:31:04.480 --> 0:31:05.560
<v Speaker 2>the winter of our lives.

0:31:06.680 --> 0:31:09.200
<v Speaker 1>So thanks for your time, Tim, Thank you so much.

0:31:12.880 --> 0:31:16.400
<v Speaker 3>Police say two suspects ambushed to Florida couple at gunpoint

0:31:16.440 --> 0:31:19.720
<v Speaker 3>near Tampa. Almost two months later, please say they've now

0:31:19.840 --> 0:31:23.680
<v Speaker 3>caught the attackers thanks to something very small taped under

0:31:23.680 --> 0:31:24.600
<v Speaker 3>the victim's vehicle.

0:31:24.760 --> 0:31:25.480
<v Speaker 1>The search of.

0:31:25.440 --> 0:31:29.040
<v Speaker 3>Their vehicle, our detectives did find that Apple AirTag. The

0:31:29.120 --> 0:31:32.760
<v Speaker 3>Hillsborough County Sheriff's offices records tied that hidden Apple AirTag

0:31:32.920 --> 0:31:35.800
<v Speaker 3>to twenty six year old Luis Enrique Charles, who was.

0:31:35.880 --> 0:31:36.840
<v Speaker 1>Arrested last week.

0:31:37.080 --> 0:31:40.040
<v Speaker 3>Apple's website spells out how people can get alerts about

0:31:40.120 --> 0:31:42.120
<v Speaker 3>nearby tracking devices like air tags.

0:31:42.200 --> 0:31:44.840
<v Speaker 1>Typically, it's on your settings whether you can be notified,

0:31:44.840 --> 0:31:47.520
<v Speaker 1>whether the AirTag pops in on your phone or not. Yeah,

0:31:47.560 --> 0:31:49.000
<v Speaker 1>it's interesting the Apple AirTag.

0:31:49.040 --> 0:31:51.160
<v Speaker 2>I mean, when I was a kid, the idea of

0:31:51.560 --> 0:31:54.680
<v Speaker 2>owning a tracking device that you could have put on

0:31:54.720 --> 0:31:57.960
<v Speaker 2>somebody's car or luggage or whatever would have been so

0:31:58.280 --> 0:32:02.200
<v Speaker 2>James Bond and crazy. Yeah, and scary and dangerous. And

0:32:02.240 --> 0:32:05.760
<v Speaker 2>now everybody's got access to one. But I keep forgetting. Yeah,

0:32:05.880 --> 0:32:07.760
<v Speaker 2>you there's a setting and I should do this on

0:32:07.800 --> 0:32:10.600
<v Speaker 2>my phone. There's a setting where you can see if

0:32:10.640 --> 0:32:13.800
<v Speaker 2>there are Apple tags nearby.

0:32:14.640 --> 0:32:19.440
<v Speaker 1>I have it turned on. Yeah, all women should. Nobody's

0:32:19.480 --> 0:32:20.160
<v Speaker 1>trying to get to me.

0:32:21.000 --> 0:32:26.480
<v Speaker 2>Uh but never no, but yeah, it'd be it's good

0:32:26.480 --> 0:32:28.960
<v Speaker 2>to know if somebody has decided. God, I would think, yeah,

0:32:28.960 --> 0:32:31.600
<v Speaker 2>if you're a woman, you got to have it turned on, Yeah,

0:32:31.640 --> 0:32:36.280
<v Speaker 2>the idea every time you leave a night nightclub, the

0:32:36.480 --> 0:32:39.240
<v Speaker 2>concern that the guy that kept asking to dance and

0:32:39.280 --> 0:32:42.080
<v Speaker 2>you kept saying no is slipped an Apple tag into

0:32:42.080 --> 0:32:44.920
<v Speaker 2>your car or purse or whatever. H Oh my god,

0:32:46.560 --> 0:32:50.640
<v Speaker 2>brave New world. We're talking about scams a little bit earlier.

0:32:50.680 --> 0:32:52.880
<v Speaker 2>And it wasn't just for the web route commercials that

0:32:52.920 --> 0:32:56.960
<v Speaker 2>were regularly doing to try to deal with getting hacked

0:32:57.000 --> 0:33:01.600
<v Speaker 2>and whatnot. It just we're all confronted with this so

0:33:01.680 --> 0:33:05.080
<v Speaker 2>many times per day. Every one of us gets up

0:33:05.120 --> 0:33:08.520
<v Speaker 2>and deletes like ten emails that are clearly attempts to

0:33:08.560 --> 0:33:12.880
<v Speaker 2>steal from us, or texts on your phone or whatever else.

0:33:13.240 --> 0:33:18.240
<v Speaker 2>Got this text id theft. There were three student loans

0:33:18.320 --> 0:33:20.760
<v Speaker 2>opened in my name that I've been trying to clear

0:33:20.840 --> 0:33:24.680
<v Speaker 2>for over a year. I've filled out and submitted copious

0:33:24.720 --> 0:33:27.760
<v Speaker 2>amounts of paperwork, and the latest request from the lender

0:33:28.080 --> 0:33:30.360
<v Speaker 2>is for a copy of my high school to diploma

0:33:30.680 --> 0:33:33.160
<v Speaker 2>to prove who I am. I don't know about you,

0:33:33.400 --> 0:33:35.640
<v Speaker 2>but I can't lay my hands on my high school diploma.

0:33:35.760 --> 0:33:36.280
<v Speaker 1>Oh geez.

0:33:36.400 --> 0:33:39.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, this person said, I'm sixty five years old and

0:33:39.120 --> 0:33:41.320
<v Speaker 2>I'm not doing the footwork to acquire a copy of

0:33:41.360 --> 0:33:42.240
<v Speaker 2>my effing.

0:33:42.080 --> 0:33:43.200
<v Speaker 1>High school diploma.

0:33:43.720 --> 0:33:45.480
<v Speaker 2>Since I don't need to care about my credit score,

0:33:45.480 --> 0:33:48.160
<v Speaker 2>I'll die with these loans of my credit report. Oh

0:33:48.200 --> 0:33:50.880
<v Speaker 2>and my credit has been supposedly frozen for years in

0:33:50.960 --> 0:33:52.880
<v Speaker 2>order to avoid such an occurrence. That's what they always

0:33:52.880 --> 0:33:56.160
<v Speaker 2>tell you, freeze your credit thing if you're worried about

0:33:56.160 --> 0:33:58.080
<v Speaker 2>your stuff being hacked.

0:33:58.080 --> 0:33:59.640
<v Speaker 1>But it's funny.

0:33:59.680 --> 0:34:01.479
<v Speaker 2>We had to do this the other day for our

0:34:01.520 --> 0:34:03.720
<v Speaker 2>company insurance where we had to prove all kinds of

0:34:03.720 --> 0:34:06.320
<v Speaker 2>different things and I needed to come up with birth

0:34:06.400 --> 0:34:10.080
<v Speaker 2>certificates and marriage certificates and various things that I didn't

0:34:10.080 --> 0:34:12.320
<v Speaker 2>know where they were, but I finally laid my hands

0:34:12.320 --> 0:34:12.920
<v Speaker 2>on them.

0:34:13.600 --> 0:34:15.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I'm trying to find those things.

0:34:15.920 --> 0:34:18.799
<v Speaker 2>It's you never think about where they are until it's

0:34:18.840 --> 0:34:21.319
<v Speaker 2>like down to the wire. Well, some of y'all are

0:34:21.520 --> 0:34:23.719
<v Speaker 2>very like my mom always was super organized and no

0:34:23.719 --> 0:34:25.080
<v Speaker 2>always knew where everything was all the time.

0:34:25.080 --> 0:34:27.000
<v Speaker 1>But I'm not that person. That's a pain in the ass.

0:34:27.440 --> 0:34:30.920
<v Speaker 2>I was great talking to Tim the lawyer, always is

0:34:31.080 --> 0:34:33.279
<v Speaker 2>and I always like his points when he gets to

0:34:33.320 --> 0:34:36.200
<v Speaker 2>stuff like he did there At the end, that it

0:34:36.320 --> 0:34:39.719
<v Speaker 2>all comes down to, we want the government involved in

0:34:39.800 --> 0:34:45.879
<v Speaker 2>our lives. As little as possible because they're so susceptible

0:34:45.960 --> 0:34:48.520
<v Speaker 2>to being well to being human beings, and human beings

0:34:48.520 --> 0:34:55.560
<v Speaker 2>can either have poor judgment, be corrupt, become corrupt, whatever

0:34:55.560 --> 0:34:58.600
<v Speaker 2>the situation is, be wacky ideologically in a way that

0:34:58.640 --> 0:35:02.040
<v Speaker 2>you don't agree. So you want and you know you

0:35:02.080 --> 0:35:04.520
<v Speaker 2>want them making decisions for you as little as possible.

0:35:04.520 --> 0:35:06.480
<v Speaker 2>And that's what it all comes down to, if you

0:35:06.600 --> 0:35:09.480
<v Speaker 2>lean right in my opinion, you want the least amount

0:35:10.080 --> 0:35:15.880
<v Speaker 2>of local, state, federal government involved in making decisions for

0:35:15.920 --> 0:35:18.600
<v Speaker 2>your life, other than in cases where you know it's

0:35:18.680 --> 0:35:21.799
<v Speaker 2>keeping you from harming someone else. But that is not

0:35:21.880 --> 0:35:25.359
<v Speaker 2>the direction that the country seems to be going as

0:35:25.400 --> 0:35:27.920
<v Speaker 2>we add more and more to our tax code and

0:35:27.960 --> 0:35:30.719
<v Speaker 2>more laws and federal laws and all these different sorts

0:35:30.719 --> 0:35:33.560
<v Speaker 2>of things. What's that There's a saying out there and there,

0:35:33.600 --> 0:35:35.680
<v Speaker 2>I think somebody even wrote a book how many federal

0:35:35.760 --> 0:35:39.520
<v Speaker 2>laws the average person violates on a daily basis, Multiple

0:35:39.560 --> 0:35:42.280
<v Speaker 2>federal laws that you violate on a daily basis, because

0:35:42.320 --> 0:35:44.279
<v Speaker 2>there are so many. And then you get into the

0:35:44.320 --> 0:35:46.479
<v Speaker 2>world of just find me the man and I'll find

0:35:46.480 --> 0:35:49.239
<v Speaker 2>the crime if you want to get somebody, and law

0:35:49.280 --> 0:35:51.320
<v Speaker 2>fare and that sort of thing. At all levels of government.

0:35:51.480 --> 0:35:52.319
<v Speaker 2>Just fantastic.

0:35:52.840 --> 0:35:53.520
<v Speaker 1>Anyway, We're going to.

0:35:53.520 --> 0:35:55.920
<v Speaker 2>Talk to Katie's dad in an hour three for the

0:35:56.000 --> 0:35:58.480
<v Speaker 2>oddest of reasons. It's not because he used to be

0:35:58.520 --> 0:36:00.920
<v Speaker 2>a judge. It's because he used to being an embalmer.

0:36:01.280 --> 0:36:03.719
<v Speaker 2>He used to embalm dead bodies and then dress them.

0:36:03.840 --> 0:36:06.759
<v Speaker 2>I just have questions about that, among other things on

0:36:06.800 --> 0:36:08.760
<v Speaker 2>the way if he missed the second the podcast Armstrong

0:36:08.760 --> 0:36:14.839
<v Speaker 2>and Getty on demand Armstrong and Getty