WEBVTT - A Shutdown Looms as Markets Move Forward

0:00:02.400 --> 0:00:06.720
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news.

0:00:11.920 --> 0:00:16.320
<v Speaker 2>This is the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. Catch us live weekdays

0:00:16.320 --> 0:00:19.560
<v Speaker 2>at seven am Eastern on Apple car Player, Android Auto

0:00:19.720 --> 0:00:23.080
<v Speaker 2>with the Bloomberg Business App. Listen on demand wherever you

0:00:23.120 --> 0:00:26.120
<v Speaker 2>get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:00:26.280 --> 0:00:27.520
<v Speaker 3>Katie Kaminski joins us.

0:00:28.080 --> 0:00:32.680
<v Speaker 4>She's a chief research strategist Alpha Simplex got way way

0:00:32.720 --> 0:00:36.080
<v Speaker 4>too many degrees from MIT to even go over. So

0:00:36.120 --> 0:00:39.240
<v Speaker 4>you do all this electrical engineering stuff, operations research.

0:00:39.240 --> 0:00:39.760
<v Speaker 5>What do you do?

0:00:40.240 --> 0:00:41.879
<v Speaker 3>You go to Wall Street?

0:00:41.600 --> 0:00:42.880
<v Speaker 6>I don't figure it out.

0:00:42.800 --> 0:00:44.720
<v Speaker 4>But anyway, Katie, thank you so much for joining us.

0:00:44.720 --> 0:00:46.879
<v Speaker 4>We always appreciate talking to you. You really give us some

0:00:47.159 --> 0:00:51.000
<v Speaker 4>really great insight. Here we heard from the Federal Reserve here.

0:00:52.240 --> 0:00:54.920
<v Speaker 4>How are you guys approaching twenty twenty five?

0:00:56.400 --> 0:00:58.800
<v Speaker 7>Well, this is a good question because I feel like

0:00:59.040 --> 0:01:02.320
<v Speaker 7>this week sent changed quite a bit, but it hasn't

0:01:02.400 --> 0:01:06.440
<v Speaker 7>changed the long term signals that we see. We still

0:01:06.480 --> 0:01:09.880
<v Speaker 7>see positive signals for equity markets, so there's still sort

0:01:09.880 --> 0:01:13.760
<v Speaker 7>of positive momentum there, especially in the US versus other regions.

0:01:14.319 --> 0:01:17.640
<v Speaker 7>We've seen short positioning in yields, which is consistent with

0:01:17.720 --> 0:01:20.640
<v Speaker 7>the Fed's positioning this week as well that you know,

0:01:20.640 --> 0:01:23.480
<v Speaker 7>we might be higher for longer for some point, and

0:01:23.520 --> 0:01:27.880
<v Speaker 7>we've also seen some downward pressure to mixed signals in commodities.

0:01:28.319 --> 0:01:30.640
<v Speaker 7>But I think the biggest thing that shocked me this

0:01:30.720 --> 0:01:33.400
<v Speaker 7>month is just the US dollar. It's the only thing

0:01:33.880 --> 0:01:37.600
<v Speaker 7>that has really strongly trended despite some of the recent turbulence.

0:01:38.400 --> 0:01:40.560
<v Speaker 8>So let's unpack that a little bit.

0:01:40.600 --> 0:01:42.959
<v Speaker 9>It feels like it's still a US exceptionalism theme, and

0:01:42.959 --> 0:01:44.480
<v Speaker 9>you you kind of say that versus you know, the

0:01:44.520 --> 0:01:47.039
<v Speaker 9>rest of the world, for example. But Mary Daily, the

0:01:47.040 --> 0:01:49.280
<v Speaker 9>San Francisco FED president, just spoke on our errand said

0:01:49.280 --> 0:01:51.200
<v Speaker 9>that she is not comfortable with the rate of inflation

0:01:51.240 --> 0:01:54.360
<v Speaker 9>at two and a half percent. That really does imply that,

0:01:54.520 --> 0:01:56.840
<v Speaker 9>no joke, if inflation doesn't come down, the Fed's going.

0:01:56.760 --> 0:01:59.320
<v Speaker 8>To cut us full stop. Does that change the US

0:01:59.400 --> 0:02:02.760
<v Speaker 8>exceptionalism feel? It definitely could.

0:02:02.800 --> 0:02:04.680
<v Speaker 7>And you know, when people have asked me, what are

0:02:04.720 --> 0:02:07.200
<v Speaker 7>the biggest things I'm worried about this here? If you

0:02:07.240 --> 0:02:09.720
<v Speaker 7>look at how markets are trading right now, they're trading

0:02:09.760 --> 0:02:13.520
<v Speaker 7>with positive correlation between stocks and bonds, and that generally

0:02:13.560 --> 0:02:17.480
<v Speaker 7>happens when inflation is sort of a key factor and

0:02:17.560 --> 0:02:20.400
<v Speaker 7>sort of the Fed's path, and so for me, the

0:02:20.520 --> 0:02:24.880
<v Speaker 7>volatility and the potential for sticky inflation or an uptick

0:02:24.880 --> 0:02:27.840
<v Speaker 7>in inflation at some point in the next year, especially

0:02:27.880 --> 0:02:31.919
<v Speaker 7>with current deficit levels, becomes that sort of left hail

0:02:32.160 --> 0:02:34.600
<v Speaker 7>concern that a lot of people are worried about. And

0:02:34.639 --> 0:02:38.239
<v Speaker 7>so I think that there's that issue. And you've seen

0:02:38.280 --> 0:02:40.280
<v Speaker 7>that as well in the steepening of the yield curve.

0:02:40.320 --> 0:02:42.680
<v Speaker 7>You saw that this week that people are starting to

0:02:42.720 --> 0:02:46.320
<v Speaker 7>price in long term inflation expectations in long term rates.

0:02:46.360 --> 0:02:49.360
<v Speaker 7>So I think higher rates could be a concern and

0:02:49.400 --> 0:02:52.000
<v Speaker 7>it could dampen the US exceptional as.

0:02:52.280 --> 0:02:55.360
<v Speaker 4>Narrative, Katie, I know you guys at off of Simplex.

0:02:55.440 --> 0:02:58.320
<v Speaker 4>You guys do everything, you trade everything, you look at everything.

0:02:58.720 --> 0:03:03.280
<v Speaker 4>How about commodities here your commodities play for twenty twenty five.

0:03:04.200 --> 0:03:06.920
<v Speaker 7>Well, this is I mean, commodities have been difficult because

0:03:06.960 --> 0:03:10.440
<v Speaker 7>what you've seen this month is that weaker economic data

0:03:10.520 --> 0:03:12.799
<v Speaker 7>has put downward pressure on commodities.

0:03:12.840 --> 0:03:14.000
<v Speaker 6>So you've definitely seen.

0:03:13.840 --> 0:03:17.880
<v Speaker 7>Some negative signals, particularly post selection and even this month,

0:03:18.360 --> 0:03:21.919
<v Speaker 7>but we also have seen some pockets of interesting supplied

0:03:22.040 --> 0:03:26.280
<v Speaker 7>demand opportunities. So take a look at coffee, which has

0:03:26.360 --> 0:03:30.120
<v Speaker 7>been you know, a really big mover things like cocoa,

0:03:30.639 --> 0:03:34.480
<v Speaker 7>other sort of more sort of baseline commodities but much

0:03:34.560 --> 0:03:38.680
<v Speaker 7>more esoteric that have provided interesting opportunities so far.

0:03:38.920 --> 0:03:40.440
<v Speaker 5>Oil is going to be a tricky one.

0:03:40.480 --> 0:03:43.800
<v Speaker 7>It's been tricky this year, and energy is going to

0:03:43.800 --> 0:03:46.120
<v Speaker 7>be in the debate. So I think that's something to

0:03:46.200 --> 0:03:48.080
<v Speaker 7>watch and consider for opportunities.

0:03:48.520 --> 0:03:50.760
<v Speaker 9>But also in the debate, though, if you add to that,

0:03:50.880 --> 0:03:53.200
<v Speaker 9>are the tariff discussions, and we saw in the last

0:03:53.160 --> 0:03:56.120
<v Speaker 9>Trump administration what that did to corn and soybeans and

0:03:56.160 --> 0:03:58.560
<v Speaker 9>wheat in terms of the trade routes in Brazil and

0:03:58.680 --> 0:04:01.160
<v Speaker 9>China and the US in terms of exporting and importing.

0:04:01.720 --> 0:04:04.720
<v Speaker 9>Are you expecting that to occur this time round?

0:04:06.000 --> 0:04:06.560
<v Speaker 8>Definitely?

0:04:06.600 --> 0:04:09.440
<v Speaker 7>And you know, in the last Trump presidency we saw

0:04:09.480 --> 0:04:13.000
<v Speaker 7>a lot of volatility around things like metals particularly, and

0:04:13.040 --> 0:04:15.560
<v Speaker 7>we studied this and if you take a look at

0:04:15.560 --> 0:04:20.960
<v Speaker 7>sort of tariff threats versus expectations, they can be very different.

0:04:21.000 --> 0:04:22.800
<v Speaker 7>And so I think what's going to be tricky for

0:04:22.920 --> 0:04:27.680
<v Speaker 7>markets is how much of those discussions actually come to fruition.

0:04:27.960 --> 0:04:30.599
<v Speaker 7>And I think that's going to take time for the

0:04:30.680 --> 0:04:33.520
<v Speaker 7>markets to understand sort of what of these tariffs are.

0:04:33.400 --> 0:04:34.320
<v Speaker 6>Actually going to happen.

0:04:34.720 --> 0:04:36.440
<v Speaker 7>And how much of that is going to bake into

0:04:36.480 --> 0:04:40.400
<v Speaker 7>prices over long term and create opportunities for positioning and

0:04:40.440 --> 0:04:44.640
<v Speaker 7>things like copper oil, et cetera over the next year.

0:04:45.360 --> 0:04:47.520
<v Speaker 4>So I'm looking at the yield curve, Katie. I think

0:04:47.560 --> 0:04:49.919
<v Speaker 4>I've got a positive yield curve. I'm not a bond person,

0:04:49.960 --> 0:04:53.280
<v Speaker 4>but I see a positive, stapening yield curve here, none

0:04:53.320 --> 0:04:55.040
<v Speaker 4>of this inverted stuff.

0:04:55.279 --> 0:04:56.160
<v Speaker 3>What does that tell you?

0:04:57.360 --> 0:05:01.040
<v Speaker 7>So usually for me, when I'm thinking about the yield curve,

0:05:01.080 --> 0:05:05.799
<v Speaker 7>I'm thinking about people pricing in long term expectations for inflation.

0:05:06.800 --> 0:05:08.919
<v Speaker 7>And if you think about that, what that means is

0:05:08.960 --> 0:05:12.120
<v Speaker 7>that we might have finally stabilized. We've been looking for

0:05:12.160 --> 0:05:15.080
<v Speaker 7>that steeper yield curve for over a year the beginning

0:05:15.120 --> 0:05:17.640
<v Speaker 7>of twenty twenty four. That was the big call, like, oh,

0:05:17.760 --> 0:05:20.000
<v Speaker 7>steeper yield curve now that we're done with the cycle.

0:05:20.400 --> 0:05:23.200
<v Speaker 7>And so for me, it really represents people trying to

0:05:23.279 --> 0:05:27.240
<v Speaker 7>assess what is the equilibrium point for long term rates,

0:05:27.279 --> 0:05:30.200
<v Speaker 7>but also how much do I need to worry about

0:05:30.200 --> 0:05:33.680
<v Speaker 7>my long term cash flows based on inflation as well?

0:05:33.760 --> 0:05:36.360
<v Speaker 7>And so right now I think people are weighing current

0:05:36.400 --> 0:05:39.560
<v Speaker 7>deficits and concerns over inflation, and that has caused some

0:05:39.600 --> 0:05:42.760
<v Speaker 7>pressure on long term bonds and created this more classic

0:05:43.400 --> 0:05:46.880
<v Speaker 7>steeper yield curve that we learn in finance degree one

0:05:46.920 --> 0:05:47.200
<v Speaker 7>oh one.

0:05:47.480 --> 0:05:50.800
<v Speaker 9>You know, you know, I wonder if the dysfunction in DC,

0:05:51.040 --> 0:05:54.720
<v Speaker 9>particularly wrapping the debt ceiling debate into a continuing resolution

0:05:55.400 --> 0:05:58.240
<v Speaker 9>or budget is also kind of de anchoring that back end.

0:06:00.400 --> 0:06:02.960
<v Speaker 7>I mean, because I think when you add the volatility

0:06:03.000 --> 0:06:07.080
<v Speaker 7>to inflation, it you know, kind of increases the ranges

0:06:07.120 --> 0:06:09.760
<v Speaker 7>of outcomes. And so if there's a probability out there

0:06:09.839 --> 0:06:12.359
<v Speaker 7>that we will have a lot of spending and that

0:06:12.400 --> 0:06:15.320
<v Speaker 7>there could be a tumultuous path to that, that suggests

0:06:15.360 --> 0:06:18.039
<v Speaker 7>that there's a lot more uncertainty around long term bonds.

0:06:18.520 --> 0:06:19.920
<v Speaker 6>And we've definitely seen that.

0:06:20.120 --> 0:06:23.680
<v Speaker 7>Since twenty twenty two, we've seen increased volatility in bonds,

0:06:23.960 --> 0:06:26.599
<v Speaker 7>and I'd expect this year, especially as we have those

0:06:26.839 --> 0:06:31.560
<v Speaker 7>those discussions, that the long term volatility for long term

0:06:31.560 --> 0:06:33.320
<v Speaker 7>bonds will stay elevated.

0:06:33.600 --> 0:06:35.320
<v Speaker 4>All right, Katie, thank you so much for joining us.

0:06:35.320 --> 0:06:38.280
<v Speaker 4>We always appreciate getting some of your time. Katiekiminski, Chief

0:06:38.320 --> 0:06:40.839
<v Speaker 4>Research strategists at Alpha Simplex.

0:06:46.200 --> 0:06:50.039
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to the Bloomberg surveillance podcast. Catch US live

0:06:50.160 --> 0:06:53.479
<v Speaker 2>weekday afternoons from seven to ten am. Easter Listen on

0:06:53.520 --> 0:06:56.760
<v Speaker 2>Apple car Play and Android Auto with a Bloomberg Business app,

0:06:56.880 --> 0:06:58.599
<v Speaker 2>or watch US live on YouTube.

0:06:58.960 --> 0:07:02.279
<v Speaker 4>Next guest here, he began his career as a stockbroker.

0:07:02.480 --> 0:07:04.880
<v Speaker 4>Listen to this firm, EF Hutton and Company. If you

0:07:04.920 --> 0:07:07.440
<v Speaker 4>wanted to sling stock back in the day, you went

0:07:07.520 --> 0:07:11.920
<v Speaker 4>to EF Hutton and Company, then Bash and Company, then

0:07:12.000 --> 0:07:16.280
<v Speaker 4>Prudential Bash. Some of the best research analysts for generations

0:07:16.400 --> 0:07:18.600
<v Speaker 4>came out of Bash in Company. Then he goes American

0:07:18.640 --> 0:07:22.000
<v Speaker 4>Stock Exchanged Chicago Board of Options is Exchange. Oh yeah,

0:07:22.000 --> 0:07:24.600
<v Speaker 4>he did some duty in the US Navy. Our next guest,

0:07:24.600 --> 0:07:27.840
<v Speaker 4>George Ball, has seen it all. He's the chairman now

0:07:27.880 --> 0:07:30.920
<v Speaker 4>of Sanders Mars. George, thank you so much for joining us.

0:07:30.920 --> 0:07:34.960
<v Speaker 4>Appreciate chatting with you. It's been a pretty good year

0:07:35.000 --> 0:07:36.760
<v Speaker 4>for twenty twenty four. I mean yes and p five

0:07:36.800 --> 0:07:39.600
<v Speaker 4>hundred twenty three percent. George, A good year for you

0:07:39.640 --> 0:07:43.000
<v Speaker 4>and your clients. What are you telling your clients about

0:07:43.640 --> 0:07:44.200
<v Speaker 4>next year?

0:07:46.320 --> 0:07:50.880
<v Speaker 10>The interesting part about the stock markets is that most

0:07:50.960 --> 0:07:54.800
<v Speaker 10>of the so called experts, which I pretend to be

0:07:54.960 --> 0:07:59.520
<v Speaker 10>in them not spend the majority of our time talking

0:07:59.560 --> 0:08:04.600
<v Speaker 10>about what was and explaining it rather than taking the

0:08:04.760 --> 0:08:10.640
<v Speaker 10>risk of talking about what is going to be. Twenty

0:08:10.680 --> 0:08:15.600
<v Speaker 10>twenty four was a remarkable year, even with the declines

0:08:15.600 --> 0:08:19.840
<v Speaker 10>in the last few days in terms of equity returns,

0:08:20.360 --> 0:08:24.760
<v Speaker 10>and therefore the question is what is going to happen

0:08:24.840 --> 0:08:28.000
<v Speaker 10>and what's going to cause it next year.

0:08:29.920 --> 0:08:31.160
<v Speaker 6>Two important points.

0:08:31.600 --> 0:08:35.800
<v Speaker 10>One is when the Fed came out with its comparative

0:08:35.880 --> 0:08:40.160
<v Speaker 10>late Hawker's stance the other day, the market clearly interpreted

0:08:40.200 --> 0:08:41.079
<v Speaker 10>it negatively.

0:08:41.600 --> 0:08:43.480
<v Speaker 6>The Fed's not going to cut rates that much.

0:08:43.800 --> 0:08:47.400
<v Speaker 10>We look at Fed funds rate as a barometer for

0:08:47.480 --> 0:08:53.360
<v Speaker 10>the market. Let's sell that's upside down. The Fed is

0:08:53.480 --> 0:08:56.719
<v Speaker 10>taking its more cautious stance in terms of future rate

0:08:56.760 --> 0:09:02.000
<v Speaker 10>cuts because of a belief that the underlying economy is

0:09:02.200 --> 0:09:06.000
<v Speaker 10>very strong. If the economy weren't strong, the Fed would

0:09:06.000 --> 0:09:09.680
<v Speaker 10>not be comfortable mitigating the number of the size of

0:09:09.840 --> 0:09:14.160
<v Speaker 10>rate cuts that are coming up. Strong economy, high earnings.

0:09:14.280 --> 0:09:17.240
<v Speaker 10>That's good for the market, all other things being equal,

0:09:17.520 --> 0:09:20.560
<v Speaker 10>And so you can enter at twenty twenty five thinking

0:09:20.800 --> 0:09:26.440
<v Speaker 10>I'd rather be participating fairly fully inequities rather than being

0:09:26.640 --> 0:09:29.360
<v Speaker 10>on the sidelines. Doesn't mean it's going to replicate twenty

0:09:29.440 --> 0:09:34.839
<v Speaker 10>twenty four, that's not likely to happen. Secondly, there are

0:09:34.920 --> 0:09:40.880
<v Speaker 10>going to be very unpredictable exogenous events. Exogenous is a

0:09:40.880 --> 0:09:43.920
<v Speaker 10>big word for saying that the Trump administration, not only

0:09:43.960 --> 0:09:48.120
<v Speaker 10>the president but the senior advisors to them, are going

0:09:48.160 --> 0:09:53.440
<v Speaker 10>to do things that are not predictable, aren't foreseen, and

0:09:53.520 --> 0:09:58.439
<v Speaker 10>aren't conventional, and that is going to throw monkey wrenches

0:09:58.480 --> 0:10:03.959
<v Speaker 10>into the marketplace in the sentiment from time to time.

0:10:04.240 --> 0:10:08.480
<v Speaker 10>So you need to be aware that there's going to

0:10:08.520 --> 0:10:15.080
<v Speaker 10>be difficult moments, tumultuous moments that are hard to anticipate.

0:10:15.440 --> 0:10:19.000
<v Speaker 10>But in the midst of it a economy where people

0:10:19.080 --> 0:10:21.920
<v Speaker 10>working hard, a lot of people working, and earnings have

0:10:22.040 --> 0:10:26.240
<v Speaker 10>to be pretty good. So be optimistic, but be aware

0:10:26.240 --> 0:10:28.000
<v Speaker 10>of heavy seas ahead from time to time.

0:10:28.640 --> 0:10:31.440
<v Speaker 8>How defensive in that do you want to be?

0:10:31.600 --> 0:10:40.640
<v Speaker 10>George In terms of equity exposures, not particularly defensive at all.

0:10:41.800 --> 0:10:49.240
<v Speaker 10>The best mitigator of risk is cash and going beyond

0:10:49.320 --> 0:10:55.800
<v Speaker 10>cash to shorter duration fixed income securities. Therefore, I think

0:10:55.920 --> 0:11:02.719
<v Speaker 10>that the smart investor, the but not a craven investor,

0:11:03.120 --> 0:11:06.199
<v Speaker 10>is going to hold more cash than normal or cash

0:11:06.320 --> 0:11:11.120
<v Speaker 10>like things as a mitigant against risk. But their equity

0:11:11.200 --> 0:11:14.120
<v Speaker 10>exposures will be comparatively daring.

0:11:15.200 --> 0:11:16.640
<v Speaker 6>The staples.

0:11:16.679 --> 0:11:22.360
<v Speaker 10>The defensive stocks utilities which have some AI exposure are

0:11:22.440 --> 0:11:26.439
<v Speaker 10>probably not the right place to be. You want to

0:11:26.480 --> 0:11:30.040
<v Speaker 10>be looking for the higher growth type of items and

0:11:30.120 --> 0:11:35.319
<v Speaker 10>probably continue at least something close to marketway to exposure

0:11:35.559 --> 0:11:36.920
<v Speaker 10>to the magnificent seven.

0:11:37.920 --> 0:11:40.080
<v Speaker 6>So with your equity.

0:11:39.679 --> 0:11:42.920
<v Speaker 10>Holdings, be a little bit smaller in terms of the

0:11:42.920 --> 0:11:50.120
<v Speaker 10>percentage allocation to stocks, but be comparatively higher risk in

0:11:50.200 --> 0:11:51.520
<v Speaker 10>terms of which stocks you own.

0:11:52.400 --> 0:11:56.080
<v Speaker 4>Lisa Alex When I started on Wall Street in June sixteenth,

0:11:56.160 --> 0:11:59.520
<v Speaker 4>nineteen eighty six, Georgia Ball was a leader of Global

0:11:59.559 --> 0:12:01.520
<v Speaker 4>Wall Street than at Prudential Based Security is one of

0:12:01.520 --> 0:12:02.600
<v Speaker 4>the greatest firms on Wall Street.

0:12:02.600 --> 0:12:03.440
<v Speaker 3>George, I got to ask you.

0:12:03.480 --> 0:12:07.359
<v Speaker 8>He's really fan boying on you right now, Georgia in eighty.

0:12:07.160 --> 0:12:10.319
<v Speaker 4>Six years of age, Dude, can you give us a

0:12:10.360 --> 0:12:11.760
<v Speaker 4>sac Just give us your perspective?

0:12:11.760 --> 0:12:12.880
<v Speaker 3>How is Global Wall Street?

0:12:12.880 --> 0:12:17.080
<v Speaker 4>How's your Wall Street changed from when you were starting

0:12:17.080 --> 0:12:20.000
<v Speaker 4>in the business to right now, because you're still a

0:12:20.120 --> 0:12:22.640
<v Speaker 4>leader on Wall Street, House it changed to.

0:12:23.480 --> 0:12:28.120
<v Speaker 10>Those of you who may be actually watching this on

0:12:28.160 --> 0:12:31.960
<v Speaker 10>a string version behind me right here is a ticker tape,

0:12:32.320 --> 0:12:36.440
<v Speaker 10>then a ticker that ran in the crash of twenty nine.

0:12:36.760 --> 0:12:39.400
<v Speaker 6>It's original ticker. It's got tape from that day. I'm

0:12:39.400 --> 0:12:39.760
<v Speaker 6>not better.

0:12:42.160 --> 0:12:45.480
<v Speaker 10>Back back in the day when I began, the people

0:12:45.520 --> 0:12:47.640
<v Speaker 10>on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange were

0:12:47.679 --> 0:12:53.000
<v Speaker 10>the rulers of finance. It's where big events took place.

0:12:53.080 --> 0:12:56.600
<v Speaker 10>It's where the people were legends. They were towering figures.

0:12:56.800 --> 0:12:59.000
<v Speaker 10>And today the New York Stock Exchanged floor is a

0:12:59.040 --> 0:13:02.280
<v Speaker 10>movie set. Uh there, Yeah, there are those stocks traded there,

0:13:02.360 --> 0:13:05.400
<v Speaker 10>but people have a lot of pancake makeup, makeup up.

0:13:06.080 --> 0:13:07.880
<v Speaker 6>That's a big difference. Uh.

0:13:08.440 --> 0:13:13.360
<v Speaker 10>Wall Street has spread to all corners of.

0:13:14.840 --> 0:13:18.640
<v Speaker 6>Our nation in the world, which is good and bad.

0:13:18.960 --> 0:13:22.480
<v Speaker 10>The bad part is the personal relationships between people, the

0:13:22.600 --> 0:13:28.679
<v Speaker 10>non technology driven relationships, the non AI fabricated relationships. Uh

0:13:29.200 --> 0:13:33.800
<v Speaker 10>created trusts and bonds that are much less strong and

0:13:33.880 --> 0:13:39.360
<v Speaker 10>really much less confining in terms of the standards of

0:13:39.400 --> 0:13:44.480
<v Speaker 10>personal behavior that existed back then. So I regret that

0:13:44.480 --> 0:13:47.400
<v Speaker 10>I think we've so we suffer some from from the

0:13:47.440 --> 0:13:52.120
<v Speaker 10>impersonalization of the financial world and the financial markets.

0:13:52.280 --> 0:13:52.520
<v Speaker 6>Yeah.

0:13:52.640 --> 0:13:56.160
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, technology lets us do things that that even.

0:13:56.000 --> 0:13:59.920
<v Speaker 6>That old codure like me could not have believed back.

0:13:59.720 --> 0:14:00.640
<v Speaker 2>In the day.

0:14:01.480 --> 0:14:02.720
<v Speaker 3>George, thanks so much for joining us.

0:14:02.720 --> 0:14:06.040
<v Speaker 4>Always appreciate getting the value of your perspective on these

0:14:06.080 --> 0:14:09.760
<v Speaker 4>markets here. George Baul, He's the chairman of Sanders Mars.

0:14:10.080 --> 0:14:11.880
<v Speaker 4>He has been on Wall Street. I can't even don't

0:14:11.880 --> 0:14:13.640
<v Speaker 4>even know when he started, but way back in the day.

0:14:13.640 --> 0:14:16.440
<v Speaker 4>But again, some of the greatest firms in the history

0:14:16.440 --> 0:14:18.840
<v Speaker 4>of Wall Street. George has Let's we appreciate getting his

0:14:19.800 --> 0:14:22.440
<v Speaker 4>perspective here on these markets.

0:14:22.760 --> 0:14:27.040
<v Speaker 2>This is the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. Listen live each weekday

0:14:27.160 --> 0:14:30.320
<v Speaker 2>starting at seven am Eastern on applecar Play and Android

0:14:30.360 --> 0:14:33.240
<v Speaker 2>Auto with the Bloomberg Business app. You can also listen

0:14:33.320 --> 0:14:36.440
<v Speaker 2>live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station,

0:14:36.840 --> 0:14:40.560
<v Speaker 2>Just say Alexa playing Bloomberg eleven thirty Bitcoin.

0:14:40.640 --> 0:14:42.720
<v Speaker 4>I'm calling out for Tom Kean because he is obviously

0:14:42.720 --> 0:14:45.520
<v Speaker 4>a huge fan of of the cryptocurrencies. It was one

0:14:45.600 --> 0:14:48.400
<v Speaker 4>hundred and seven thousand, just like a cup of coffee goes.

0:14:48.440 --> 0:14:50.720
<v Speaker 4>Tom Kean would say, here we are at ninety two thousand.

0:14:51.160 --> 0:14:54.360
<v Speaker 4>To me, I view this, I'm just my personal view.

0:14:54.360 --> 0:14:58.680
<v Speaker 4>I viewed as a commodity. Okay, gold, it's just supplying

0:14:58.720 --> 0:15:00.280
<v Speaker 4>dement That's what to me.

0:15:00.360 --> 0:15:02.200
<v Speaker 8>That's how I view it, so that a safe haven call.

0:15:02.280 --> 0:15:05.400
<v Speaker 3>Then I we don't know. I don't know. It's oil,

0:15:05.480 --> 0:15:06.440
<v Speaker 3>it's gold, I don't know.

0:15:06.480 --> 0:15:08.760
<v Speaker 4>But our next guest is a professional on this stuff,

0:15:08.920 --> 0:15:13.880
<v Speaker 4>Ayesha KEI. She's a COO of mnn C group. I'm

0:15:13.880 --> 0:15:17.000
<v Speaker 4>not sure what they do, but that sounds good. Can

0:15:17.000 --> 0:15:20.600
<v Speaker 4>you talk to us about how we should think about

0:15:21.000 --> 0:15:22.240
<v Speaker 4>crypto in general?

0:15:22.280 --> 0:15:23.440
<v Speaker 3>How do you think about it?

0:15:23.520 --> 0:15:24.720
<v Speaker 5>How do I think about it?

0:15:24.920 --> 0:15:28.320
<v Speaker 11>I mean I I put it on a pedestal because

0:15:28.440 --> 0:15:30.200
<v Speaker 11>we are a hedge fund that trades it.

0:15:30.680 --> 0:15:33.080
<v Speaker 5>So that's what we do. We make liquid markets for it.

0:15:34.640 --> 0:15:37.400
<v Speaker 5>The second time I was on this show, I called.

0:15:37.080 --> 0:15:40.560
<v Speaker 11>Bitcoin a one hundred thousand yeah, and Tom laughed at

0:15:41.440 --> 0:15:43.360
<v Speaker 11>like that go ahead, yeah yeah. Tom left at me,

0:15:43.440 --> 0:15:47.040
<v Speaker 11>he's you're a professor, Like should you be serious? And

0:15:47.080 --> 0:15:50.360
<v Speaker 11>I said, I'm very serious because we see it at

0:15:50.400 --> 0:15:53.680
<v Speaker 11>that value, and this is before even the election, right

0:15:53.920 --> 0:15:58.080
<v Speaker 11>before the election results. Yes, we view it as a commodity.

0:15:58.240 --> 0:16:01.600
<v Speaker 11>It is setting, you know, a ground work for digital assets.

0:16:02.080 --> 0:16:05.760
<v Speaker 11>And I think that you know, that's where the economies,

0:16:05.800 --> 0:16:09.800
<v Speaker 11>that's where the technology is hitted. Anyways, right, like more faster,

0:16:10.400 --> 0:16:14.040
<v Speaker 11>you know, processes to exchange money, more faster processes for

0:16:14.120 --> 0:16:19.080
<v Speaker 11>cross border payments, and the technology behind bitcoin sets that

0:16:19.760 --> 0:16:21.480
<v Speaker 11>and but there's like a lot.

0:16:21.280 --> 0:16:22.880
<v Speaker 5>Of groundwork being done.

0:16:24.200 --> 0:16:26.680
<v Speaker 11>The only reason we've seen that kind of price action

0:16:27.040 --> 0:16:30.880
<v Speaker 11>just recently is because the administration, the upcoming administration is

0:16:31.160 --> 0:16:31.880
<v Speaker 11>pro crypto.

0:16:32.480 --> 0:16:34.760
<v Speaker 5>So that's why the market markets rallied.

0:16:34.920 --> 0:16:38.520
<v Speaker 9>So MNNC Group is a quantitative digital asset investment firm,

0:16:38.560 --> 0:16:41.680
<v Speaker 9>So it's not just bitcoin, it's with digital assets, which

0:16:41.720 --> 0:16:44.320
<v Speaker 9>is a huge step in technological advancements.

0:16:44.360 --> 0:16:44.760
<v Speaker 8>I get that.

0:16:45.080 --> 0:16:48.360
<v Speaker 9>So how do you look at an asset that's crypto related?

0:16:48.400 --> 0:16:50.200
<v Speaker 9>And then you got like fart coin, you know what

0:16:50.240 --> 0:16:53.680
<v Speaker 9>I mean? Like, how do I love it? I love

0:16:53.720 --> 0:16:54.600
<v Speaker 9>my knowledge on it.

0:16:54.720 --> 0:16:59.040
<v Speaker 5>I love it fantastic. So fart coin is a weave coin,

0:17:00.080 --> 0:17:00.680
<v Speaker 5>Howard Stern.

0:17:01.360 --> 0:17:05.400
<v Speaker 9>No, No, this Bloomer Surveillance Radio seven Friday, and.

0:17:05.400 --> 0:17:07.840
<v Speaker 5>I have to go and teach my kids at nay

0:17:07.920 --> 0:17:08.520
<v Speaker 5>you after this.

0:17:08.600 --> 0:17:10.680
<v Speaker 11>So I imagine if like any one of them ended

0:17:10.760 --> 0:17:13.720
<v Speaker 11>up catch like you know, catching this on TV. But

0:17:16.040 --> 0:17:20.240
<v Speaker 11>meme coin, right, even though these are just useless tokens

0:17:20.280 --> 0:17:22.960
<v Speaker 11>that are being traded in the liquid markets. In my

0:17:23.200 --> 0:17:25.679
<v Speaker 11>very personal opinion, and I talk about this like in

0:17:25.720 --> 0:17:26.400
<v Speaker 11>my class.

0:17:26.560 --> 0:17:30.960
<v Speaker 5>Look guys, these tokens are literally putting blockchains to work. Right.

0:17:31.320 --> 0:17:33.679
<v Speaker 11>So if this is if this token is based on

0:17:33.720 --> 0:17:37.200
<v Speaker 11>Solana or this token is based on coin basis base,

0:17:37.720 --> 0:17:40.600
<v Speaker 11>that is just making sure that the blockchain actually works

0:17:40.600 --> 0:17:41.480
<v Speaker 11>for that kind.

0:17:41.280 --> 0:17:45.200
<v Speaker 5>Of fast buy and sell transaction. That's the youth. I mean,

0:17:45.240 --> 0:17:47.440
<v Speaker 5>that's just like touch up.

0:17:47.840 --> 0:17:50.520
<v Speaker 11>Kind of testing the technology if it works or not.

0:17:51.480 --> 0:17:55.320
<v Speaker 11>But yes, does part coin has an underlying value? Absolutely?

0:17:55.440 --> 0:18:00.359
<v Speaker 11>Now does it make sense to exist, Absolutely no, But

0:18:01.080 --> 0:18:05.160
<v Speaker 11>it is actually just showing everyone that, look, we can

0:18:05.240 --> 0:18:08.280
<v Speaker 11>create assets on a very decentralized market.

0:18:09.640 --> 0:18:14.760
<v Speaker 4>You're also Adjunct Professor of Blockchain and Distributed Ledger Tech

0:18:15.280 --> 0:18:16.000
<v Speaker 4>at NYU.

0:18:16.440 --> 0:18:20.720
<v Speaker 3>Somebody actually created that title. Uh, yes, that is awesome.

0:18:21.280 --> 0:18:23.440
<v Speaker 8>I was thinking the same thing. I was like, wow, okay, I.

0:18:23.359 --> 0:18:25.880
<v Speaker 4>Mean and again it has to be at n YU

0:18:25.920 --> 0:18:29.399
<v Speaker 4>in my sense because they kind of cover everything that's

0:18:29.440 --> 0:18:32.679
<v Speaker 4>cutting edge there. In my opinion, What do you think

0:18:32.680 --> 0:18:36.360
<v Speaker 4>about this new administration? What does it mean for crypto

0:18:36.440 --> 0:18:39.040
<v Speaker 4>in general? Because my thought is I'm not sure this

0:18:39.080 --> 0:18:41.359
<v Speaker 4>president would know a cryptocurrency if he tripped over it.

0:18:41.440 --> 0:18:44.520
<v Speaker 3>But that's probably true for everybody out there in the world.

0:18:44.600 --> 0:18:47.080
<v Speaker 4>There's a select few that really understand what's going on

0:18:47.119 --> 0:18:49.280
<v Speaker 4>out there. But what do you think this administration means

0:18:49.320 --> 0:18:50.720
<v Speaker 4>for cryptotechnology?

0:18:50.720 --> 0:18:52.160
<v Speaker 3>Maybe from a regulatory.

0:18:51.720 --> 0:18:55.960
<v Speaker 11>Perspective or from regulatory perspective, yes, right, like change of administration,

0:18:56.080 --> 0:19:00.199
<v Speaker 11>change of SEC, change of CFTC, just more more or

0:19:00.280 --> 0:19:04.639
<v Speaker 11>understanding you know how digital currency works. That's the number

0:19:04.720 --> 0:19:07.760
<v Speaker 11>one fact. Even Department of Treasury is pro crypto. And

0:19:07.760 --> 0:19:10.080
<v Speaker 11>when we say pro crypto, it's just that they understand

0:19:10.080 --> 0:19:13.800
<v Speaker 11>what digital assets are, right. And then you know, the

0:19:13.920 --> 0:19:17.159
<v Speaker 11>same same thing with the upcoming president. He may not know,

0:19:17.320 --> 0:19:20.199
<v Speaker 11>but his sons do, right. And then every now and

0:19:20.240 --> 0:19:22.360
<v Speaker 11>then we hear something, Oh, Baron taught me.

0:19:22.400 --> 0:19:24.440
<v Speaker 5>This, or Eric, or Eric taught me that.

0:19:24.680 --> 0:19:27.080
<v Speaker 11>And we've seen Eric, you know, at a couple of

0:19:27.320 --> 0:19:31.920
<v Speaker 11>you know, blockchain conferences. Okay, So I think like that's

0:19:32.000 --> 0:19:33.919
<v Speaker 11>where the word I guess is coming from.

0:19:34.520 --> 0:19:39.640
<v Speaker 9>Okay, distinguished for viewers like myself, the distinction that we

0:19:39.720 --> 0:19:43.760
<v Speaker 9>make between a digital token and then blockchain, and then

0:19:43.800 --> 0:19:46.959
<v Speaker 9>what the importance is to make sure that blockchain works.

0:19:48.680 --> 0:19:51.080
<v Speaker 5>Fart Coin is testing that right, right, But what does

0:19:51.119 --> 0:19:51.480
<v Speaker 5>that mean?

0:19:51.960 --> 0:19:55.760
<v Speaker 11>That basically means that you can use a blockchain, which

0:19:55.800 --> 0:20:00.040
<v Speaker 11>is a decentralized ledger where you and I transact and

0:20:00.160 --> 0:20:04.639
<v Speaker 11>then you know, Paul gets to see it, right, And

0:20:05.040 --> 0:20:07.880
<v Speaker 11>that's that's to make sure that the blockchain is working,

0:20:07.920 --> 0:20:09.640
<v Speaker 11>the technology is working.

0:20:09.840 --> 0:20:13.440
<v Speaker 8>And we need the technology because why.

0:20:13.480 --> 0:20:15.000
<v Speaker 5>Because it's open source.

0:20:15.200 --> 0:20:19.000
<v Speaker 11>Everyone can see the two people transacting and everyone can

0:20:19.040 --> 0:20:22.800
<v Speaker 11>see you know, who's sending who, and then faster. The

0:20:22.880 --> 0:20:26.119
<v Speaker 11>reason it's it's faster. It's like super quick, like a

0:20:26.160 --> 0:20:30.800
<v Speaker 11>couple of seconds for instant settlement and finalization of that settlement.

0:20:30.880 --> 0:20:33.880
<v Speaker 11>Right like I cannot ask you for your money back once.

0:20:33.720 --> 0:20:36.360
<v Speaker 5>I've sent that to you. He would like to see that.

0:20:36.880 --> 0:20:40.479
<v Speaker 11>And that's what the open source technology, the open source

0:20:40.880 --> 0:20:42.160
<v Speaker 11>distributed ledgers.

0:20:41.920 --> 0:20:48.000
<v Speaker 4>Shows ETFs have been a major story for crypto and

0:20:48.080 --> 0:20:49.200
<v Speaker 4>bitcoin in particular.

0:20:49.600 --> 0:20:51.320
<v Speaker 3>What does it mean to you? How do you guys

0:20:52.119 --> 0:20:54.080
<v Speaker 3>use bitcoin ETFs?

0:20:54.320 --> 0:20:55.960
<v Speaker 5>We don't, don't, We don't.

0:20:56.119 --> 0:21:00.000
<v Speaker 11>It's it's mainly an institutional product for investors who were

0:21:00.400 --> 0:21:03.720
<v Speaker 11>like access to bitcoin, but don't want to actually touch

0:21:03.840 --> 0:21:08.720
<v Speaker 11>the bitcoin or you know, ethereum. It's an institutional product

0:21:08.760 --> 0:21:09.760
<v Speaker 11>for them.

0:21:10.359 --> 0:21:13.240
<v Speaker 3>So how do you guys, do you trade in straight?

0:21:13.600 --> 0:21:17.560
<v Speaker 11>We trade straight bitcoin and straight ethereum and straight other coins.

0:21:17.720 --> 0:21:20.280
<v Speaker 3>Who's been buying the bitcoin is a micro strategy.

0:21:19.840 --> 0:21:21.680
<v Speaker 8>Microstoftic micro Strategy.

0:21:21.720 --> 0:21:23.239
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, what's up with that?

0:21:23.400 --> 0:21:25.920
<v Speaker 11>I mean, he went from his twenty five million dollars

0:21:25.960 --> 0:21:27.840
<v Speaker 11>to I think like twenty.

0:21:27.520 --> 0:21:28.840
<v Speaker 5>Five billion at this point.

0:21:28.920 --> 0:21:31.840
<v Speaker 11>He just he just kept buying bitcoin and bitcoin and bitcoin,

0:21:31.880 --> 0:21:34.280
<v Speaker 11>and he's about to get listed on NASTAC I think

0:21:34.280 --> 0:21:37.640
<v Speaker 11>December twenty first, and his largest.

0:21:37.200 --> 0:21:38.520
<v Speaker 5>Holding is bitcoin.

0:21:38.560 --> 0:21:41.320
<v Speaker 11>He's one of the largest holder, if not the largest

0:21:41.320 --> 0:21:42.240
<v Speaker 11>holder of bitcoin.

0:21:42.359 --> 0:21:43.000
<v Speaker 3>Is that a good thing?

0:21:44.200 --> 0:21:46.520
<v Speaker 5>It's a very interesting thing, absolutely right.

0:21:46.359 --> 0:21:47.880
<v Speaker 8>It is a thing. I guess it is a thing,

0:21:48.119 --> 0:21:48.480
<v Speaker 8>right thing.

0:21:48.600 --> 0:21:51.480
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, I mean, I guess though, I guess. I just

0:21:51.560 --> 0:21:54.160
<v Speaker 9>wonder if it perpetuates fraud on blockchain?

0:21:54.240 --> 0:21:56.920
<v Speaker 8>Is that happen a lot? Because that is a risk too, right.

0:21:57.080 --> 0:21:58.520
<v Speaker 5>That is absolutely a risk.

0:21:59.320 --> 0:22:03.520
<v Speaker 11>We've seen like companies emerged like chain and chain analysis

0:22:03.560 --> 0:22:06.520
<v Speaker 11>TRM labs that kind of prevent it or that kind

0:22:06.520 --> 0:22:08.960
<v Speaker 11>of trace it.

0:22:08.960 --> 0:22:10.679
<v Speaker 5>It has gone better over the years.

0:22:12.200 --> 0:22:14.760
<v Speaker 11>It's you know, you can easily trace the transaction that

0:22:15.040 --> 0:22:19.679
<v Speaker 11>is fraudulent, very much less on bitcoin or ethereum, but

0:22:20.480 --> 0:22:21.359
<v Speaker 11>we have solutions.

0:22:21.560 --> 0:22:26.920
<v Speaker 4>Aisha Kiyani, CEO n C Group, also at check professor

0:22:26.920 --> 0:22:36.320
<v Speaker 4>Blockchain and Distributed Ledger Tech at New York University NYU.

0:22:37.160 --> 0:22:41.440
<v Speaker 2>This is the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. Listen live each weekday

0:22:41.520 --> 0:22:44.760
<v Speaker 2>starting at seven am Eastern on applecar Play and Android

0:22:44.760 --> 0:22:47.720
<v Speaker 2>Auto with the Bloomberg Business app. You can also watch

0:22:47.760 --> 0:22:51.040
<v Speaker 2>us live every weekday on YouTube and always on the

0:22:51.040 --> 0:22:52.040
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Terminal.

0:22:52.080 --> 0:22:54.040
<v Speaker 3>All right, folks, you're daily look at the front pages

0:22:54.080 --> 0:22:56.000
<v Speaker 3>around the world. Lease Smith tayo. What do you have

0:22:56.000 --> 0:22:56.960
<v Speaker 3>worst today with newspapers?

0:22:57.040 --> 0:22:59.119
<v Speaker 1>Well, it's probably not gonna be much for you, but

0:22:59.200 --> 0:22:59.600
<v Speaker 1>more for.

0:22:59.600 --> 0:23:02.879
<v Speaker 8>Alie up yep, I feel that's coming. She feels like coming. Okay,

0:23:03.040 --> 0:23:04.440
<v Speaker 8>new hair color, yay.

0:23:05.080 --> 0:23:10.240
<v Speaker 1>It's called recession blonde or maybe mouse brown. Hairstyles say

0:23:10.240 --> 0:23:12.880
<v Speaker 1>that their clients are a little bit budget, you know, conscious,

0:23:12.920 --> 0:23:14.920
<v Speaker 1>so they're asking for a new color that it's a

0:23:14.960 --> 0:23:18.199
<v Speaker 1>little bit low more and low maintenance because it's been

0:23:18.240 --> 0:23:20.480
<v Speaker 1>a lot of time money blonde hair highlights.

0:23:20.560 --> 0:23:21.000
<v Speaker 8>I know it.

0:23:21.080 --> 0:23:21.639
<v Speaker 5>I've tried it.

0:23:21.760 --> 0:23:22.960
<v Speaker 3>Okay, it takes a while.

0:23:23.160 --> 0:23:25.280
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes you can sit there for hours. You can pay

0:23:25.359 --> 0:23:28.200
<v Speaker 1>up to four hundred dollars a visit. And celebrities like

0:23:28.240 --> 0:23:30.600
<v Speaker 1>Taylor Swift. You see her hair change. Yeah, like she

0:23:30.640 --> 0:23:32.960
<v Speaker 1>went from the blonde blonde leak pan and now it's like,

0:23:33.000 --> 0:23:34.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, toned it down a little.

0:23:34.000 --> 0:23:34.800
<v Speaker 8>This is my life too.

0:23:34.840 --> 0:23:37.280
<v Speaker 9>This is my trajectory with hair color and Taylor Swift

0:23:37.320 --> 0:23:39.520
<v Speaker 9>are very similar because basically, if you see any blonde

0:23:39.520 --> 0:23:41.240
<v Speaker 9>over the age of thirty, like, you know that there's

0:23:41.280 --> 0:23:42.200
<v Speaker 9>color in that hair corre.

0:23:42.240 --> 0:23:42.400
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:23:42.480 --> 0:23:44.720
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, So like a lot of my hair color is natural,

0:23:44.760 --> 0:23:46.440
<v Speaker 9>and I do the highlights. I'm like in and out

0:23:46.480 --> 0:23:47.800
<v Speaker 9>in twenty minutes.

0:23:47.800 --> 0:23:50.680
<v Speaker 8>Because you're short hair well yeah, but.

0:23:50.160 --> 0:23:52.240
<v Speaker 9>But even if I wasn't, I mean the style of

0:23:52.400 --> 0:23:55.480
<v Speaker 9>just paints the highlights on and then we're done, like

0:23:55.480 --> 0:23:56.240
<v Speaker 9>twenty minutes in.

0:23:56.200 --> 0:23:57.880
<v Speaker 5>The little heating thing and we're out of here.

0:23:57.960 --> 0:24:00.000
<v Speaker 9>Versus like when I used to go more like platinum,

0:24:00.680 --> 0:24:03.400
<v Speaker 9>it was a lot more labor intensive and a lot

0:24:03.400 --> 0:24:04.000
<v Speaker 9>more expensive.

0:24:04.040 --> 0:24:06.640
<v Speaker 8>So you know, I feel this. We're going for contrast,

0:24:07.080 --> 0:24:08.400
<v Speaker 8>contrast color in the hair.

0:24:08.720 --> 0:24:09.159
<v Speaker 3>I like it.

0:24:09.880 --> 0:24:12.680
<v Speaker 4>Both of you guys natural great, it works. I work

0:24:12.800 --> 0:24:13.359
<v Speaker 4>hard on this.

0:24:13.640 --> 0:24:17.360
<v Speaker 8>But actually, my mom has amazing platinum hair. She doesn't diet.

0:24:17.440 --> 0:24:19.440
<v Speaker 9>It's just like her natural hair. So I'm like, let's go,

0:24:20.000 --> 0:24:22.080
<v Speaker 9>like when that moment happens, we're going to be all

0:24:22.080 --> 0:24:22.359
<v Speaker 9>in on that.

0:24:22.440 --> 0:24:24.000
<v Speaker 3>But it's expensive for you.

0:24:23.920 --> 0:24:26.879
<v Speaker 1>Guys, it is, Yeah, it's very expensive and it's often

0:24:27.000 --> 0:24:29.639
<v Speaker 1>like sometimes you have to do it four months or

0:24:29.720 --> 0:24:32.280
<v Speaker 1>so during the pandemic, I did my own. I did

0:24:32.280 --> 0:24:32.679
<v Speaker 1>the box.

0:24:33.320 --> 0:24:37.760
<v Speaker 9>I was very much a mouse brown brunette with some

0:24:37.960 --> 0:24:40.280
<v Speaker 9>like love. Actually, no, I think I went in pretty

0:24:40.280 --> 0:24:42.800
<v Speaker 9>early because I was back on TV in like January

0:24:42.880 --> 0:24:45.240
<v Speaker 9>June of twenty twenty, so I think that they opened

0:24:45.240 --> 0:24:47.520
<v Speaker 9>the salon and it was just like, you know, everyone's

0:24:47.600 --> 0:24:48.080
<v Speaker 9>masked up.

0:24:48.200 --> 0:24:51.199
<v Speaker 1>I was at like CBS, Walgreens, Get in the box.

0:24:51.480 --> 0:24:52.200
<v Speaker 5>What I was doing?

0:24:52.760 --> 0:24:53.080
<v Speaker 9>All right?

0:24:53.119 --> 0:24:56.200
<v Speaker 1>So the next one, Toys, the chief executive of Toys

0:24:56.240 --> 0:24:59.280
<v Speaker 1>r US Asia separate from the US parent company, tells

0:24:59.280 --> 0:25:02.000
<v Speaker 1>a financial time it's looking beyond kid toys this holiday,

0:25:02.040 --> 0:25:06.000
<v Speaker 1>it's moving to k adults. So that's because you know

0:25:06.119 --> 0:25:08.240
<v Speaker 1>falling birth rates in Asia, right, So they're focused on

0:25:08.280 --> 0:25:10.840
<v Speaker 1>the gen z kitdults, which is people in their like

0:25:11.320 --> 0:25:14.000
<v Speaker 1>twenty early twenties to late twenties, that kind of group.

0:25:14.720 --> 0:25:17.280
<v Speaker 1>They're spending counts for about one eighth of the company's revenue,

0:25:17.280 --> 0:25:20.159
<v Speaker 1>but sales are growing fast in China and Japan. So

0:25:20.400 --> 0:25:23.360
<v Speaker 1>how they're doing it well, one thing hello kitty, right,

0:25:23.440 --> 0:25:25.720
<v Speaker 1>big thing for women too, So they're trying to attract

0:25:25.720 --> 0:25:30.320
<v Speaker 1>that crowd, they go to cultural trends like gamers, Genshen impact.

0:25:30.359 --> 0:25:30.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't know.

0:25:30.760 --> 0:25:32.160
<v Speaker 8>That's the thing is that is that?

0:25:32.359 --> 0:25:37.240
<v Speaker 1>Do I say right into the game expert Genshan impact,

0:25:37.359 --> 0:25:39.640
<v Speaker 1>and also like Hollywood movies that are coming out. So

0:25:39.800 --> 0:25:41.960
<v Speaker 1>this is the shift they're doing so because they don't

0:25:42.040 --> 0:25:44.199
<v Speaker 1>have as many kids in Asia, so now they have

0:25:44.320 --> 0:25:45.880
<v Speaker 1>to switch to down.

0:25:46.320 --> 0:25:48.120
<v Speaker 3>It seems like I hear the story everywhere.

0:25:48.160 --> 0:25:48.320
<v Speaker 9>Now.

0:25:48.359 --> 0:25:49.320
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, they're down to as.

0:25:49.560 --> 0:25:51.879
<v Speaker 4>I mean, you know what up to the Irish Catholic

0:25:51.880 --> 0:25:53.719
<v Speaker 4>family when you get like eight and kids.

0:25:53.840 --> 0:25:55.520
<v Speaker 8>That's that's not higher education.

0:25:55.840 --> 0:25:57.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that's what happened.

0:25:57.520 --> 0:26:01.520
<v Speaker 9>I'm not putting like that to college. I mean I

0:26:01.600 --> 0:26:03.720
<v Speaker 9>like toys, but like I don't need like a Hello

0:26:03.800 --> 0:26:04.199
<v Speaker 9>Kitty thing?

0:26:04.240 --> 0:26:06.440
<v Speaker 1>Would you board games?

0:26:06.440 --> 0:26:09.040
<v Speaker 8>I would do board games okay, But other than that,

0:26:09.240 --> 0:26:12.480
<v Speaker 8>I I'm not clutter. I don't like clutters. Don't like

0:26:12.560 --> 0:26:13.600
<v Speaker 8>my desk. Care fool you.

0:26:14.200 --> 0:26:17.400
<v Speaker 9>I don't like clutter. I don't like stuff, doesn't ask

0:26:17.400 --> 0:26:19.000
<v Speaker 9>my husband life.

0:26:19.040 --> 0:26:22.320
<v Speaker 3>I'm just getting yes, so good.

0:26:22.520 --> 0:26:25.439
<v Speaker 1>I always say that good throw stuff out yep. Okay,

0:26:26.520 --> 0:26:29.639
<v Speaker 1>this one wll Street Journal, the James Bond Battle. Okay,

0:26:29.640 --> 0:26:32.720
<v Speaker 1>so about here's here's the backstory. Okay, three years ago,

0:26:32.760 --> 0:26:35.159
<v Speaker 1>Amazon required the rights to release Bond movies through what

0:26:35.320 --> 0:26:39.320
<v Speaker 1>it purchased MGM. But the relationship between the family that

0:26:39.440 --> 0:26:42.879
<v Speaker 1>oversees the Bond franchise and Amazon is pretty much falling apart.

0:26:43.400 --> 0:26:46.280
<v Speaker 1>So with that new hope of a new Bond film

0:26:46.359 --> 0:26:48.320
<v Speaker 1>is kind of in jeopardy. You haven't seen one in

0:26:48.320 --> 0:26:51.000
<v Speaker 1>a while because at the time the MGM sale, the

0:26:51.000 --> 0:26:53.639
<v Speaker 1>Bond franchise represented the significant share of the six and

0:26:53.680 --> 0:26:56.520
<v Speaker 1>a half billion dollar company that paid for the studio.

0:26:57.040 --> 0:26:59.000
<v Speaker 1>So the person who holds a power her name is

0:26:59.040 --> 0:27:03.919
<v Speaker 1>Barbara Brockel Broccoli. Actually she inherited from her father, so

0:27:04.000 --> 0:27:06.240
<v Speaker 1>she's told friends that she doesn't really trust Amazon.

0:27:06.480 --> 0:27:08.560
<v Speaker 3>So I don't know if James Bond.

0:27:08.880 --> 0:27:10.959
<v Speaker 1>It's kind of in jeopardy now, don't I don't know.

0:27:11.359 --> 0:27:13.080
<v Speaker 3>You're right, we haven't seen one in a while, have we.

0:27:13.119 --> 0:27:15.800
<v Speaker 8>I mean, like I think I'm okay, I'm okay, I'm

0:27:15.800 --> 0:27:17.720
<v Speaker 8>going over. But I mean Daniel.

0:27:17.400 --> 0:27:19.720
<v Speaker 9>Craig was so awesome as the last Bond and that

0:27:19.920 --> 0:27:23.960
<v Speaker 9>and the whole pained like you know, spy thing, Like

0:27:24.080 --> 0:27:26.320
<v Speaker 9>I don't know, Like I don't need another Superman movie either,

0:27:26.520 --> 0:27:26.880
<v Speaker 9>Like I don't.

0:27:27.040 --> 0:27:28.880
<v Speaker 8>I'm good like you can.

0:27:29.280 --> 0:27:31.840
<v Speaker 1>They need to make money because they invested so much

0:27:31.840 --> 0:27:32.679
<v Speaker 1>when they bought it.

0:27:32.760 --> 0:27:35.640
<v Speaker 3>That's true, and that's that's the issue. What Daniel Craig

0:27:35.760 --> 0:27:37.840
<v Speaker 3>was a really good it was. It was very bond

0:27:38.200 --> 0:27:38.760
<v Speaker 3>I grew up.

0:27:39.000 --> 0:27:42.480
<v Speaker 4>My bond was really I guess Roger Moore was my

0:27:42.800 --> 0:27:45.200
<v Speaker 4>Oh growing up, I.

0:27:45.200 --> 0:27:48.880
<v Speaker 1>Caught the tail end of Sean Connery, Sean Connory, Yeah,

0:27:49.240 --> 0:27:49.840
<v Speaker 1>Nokiars Bros.

0:27:49.880 --> 0:27:50.280
<v Speaker 5>And takers.

0:27:50.520 --> 0:27:53.639
<v Speaker 8>Mine was heres bros. And that was my bond growing up.

0:27:54.160 --> 0:27:55.080
<v Speaker 8>Such a nice hair.

0:27:55.400 --> 0:27:57.280
<v Speaker 9>Yes, I did enjoy that, but that was more like

0:27:57.359 --> 0:27:59.840
<v Speaker 9>cheesy fun, which incidentally is very much my jam when

0:27:59.840 --> 0:28:03.440
<v Speaker 9>it some movies cheesy fun. But uh, Daniel Craig really

0:28:03.440 --> 0:28:04.639
<v Speaker 9>like took it to the next.

0:28:04.560 --> 0:28:07.680
<v Speaker 4>To the next Skyfall coming out, and they came out

0:28:07.720 --> 0:28:11.800
<v Speaker 4>in twenty twelve, made one point one billion globally, So yeah,

0:28:11.800 --> 0:28:13.760
<v Speaker 4>he made a ton of money for that. But if

0:28:13.760 --> 0:28:17.560
<v Speaker 4>you're if you're MGM, that effectively was the asset value

0:28:17.600 --> 0:28:20.840
<v Speaker 4>of that company, of course, and and that's what I forgot.

0:28:20.840 --> 0:28:23.080
<v Speaker 4>Amazon bought them, so yeah.

0:28:22.520 --> 0:28:24.919
<v Speaker 9>Wait, so they're trying to do an Amazon like James

0:28:24.920 --> 0:28:27.200
<v Speaker 9>Bond TV show, Because I would super be down with that.

0:28:28.080 --> 0:28:28.879
<v Speaker 8>I don't know, We don't know.

0:28:28.920 --> 0:28:31.120
<v Speaker 1>It's probably just any franchise they need the green light

0:28:31.160 --> 0:28:32.199
<v Speaker 1>from Barbara Brockley.

0:28:32.320 --> 0:28:34.160
<v Speaker 9>Oh and here's some of the questions in the journal article.

0:28:34.240 --> 0:28:37.320
<v Speaker 9>What about a money penny spin off or TV spin

0:28:37.359 --> 0:28:39.360
<v Speaker 9>off with a female double O seven? But I feel

0:28:39.360 --> 0:28:41.720
<v Speaker 9>like people would going nuts if that happened.

0:28:42.680 --> 0:28:45.160
<v Speaker 1>That's that's a big money maker. Have you guys ever

0:28:45.200 --> 0:28:46.840
<v Speaker 1>been to the SOHO House in the city?

0:28:46.840 --> 0:28:53.040
<v Speaker 8>Are you kidding? No, No, I've been. Paul Sweeney has

0:28:53.080 --> 0:28:54.560
<v Speaker 8>not been to the That's.

0:28:54.480 --> 0:28:56.920
<v Speaker 3>A great point. What has happened exactly?

0:28:57.080 --> 0:28:59.920
<v Speaker 1>Okay, So it's this exclusive members of only social club, right,

0:29:00.360 --> 0:29:03.640
<v Speaker 1>forty five club, more than quarter million members, annual membership

0:29:04.240 --> 0:29:06.240
<v Speaker 1>two hundred dollars if you have to be twenty seven

0:29:06.280 --> 0:29:11.400
<v Speaker 1>and over. They received apparently nearly two billion dollar takeover

0:29:12.360 --> 0:29:13.840
<v Speaker 1>a new third party consortium.

0:29:13.840 --> 0:29:14.400
<v Speaker 8>That's all they said.

0:29:14.440 --> 0:29:16.200
<v Speaker 1>They didn't give a name or the parties involved, And

0:29:16.240 --> 0:29:20.120
<v Speaker 1>they said the takeover back by billionaire chairman Ron Berkele.

0:29:20.360 --> 0:29:24.240
<v Speaker 1>But three quarters of SOO houses common stock is owned

0:29:24.240 --> 0:29:26.920
<v Speaker 1>by the company's board it's affiliates. So this year's really

0:29:27.000 --> 0:29:29.400
<v Speaker 1>actually took a toime. Yesterday they were down forty seven percent.

0:29:29.400 --> 0:29:31.920
<v Speaker 1>Now they're down about three. But this is the thing,

0:29:31.960 --> 0:29:34.600
<v Speaker 1>it's really been struggling with profitability. You've heard in sohoos

0:29:34.640 --> 0:29:37.160
<v Speaker 1>in the headlines all because of that, because they're just

0:29:37.280 --> 0:29:39.920
<v Speaker 1>struggling to make some money, especially during COVID really hurt

0:29:39.960 --> 0:29:40.320
<v Speaker 1>them too.

0:29:41.440 --> 0:29:42.200
<v Speaker 3>But yeah, an.

0:29:42.200 --> 0:29:45.800
<v Speaker 4>Annual membership to all of soho Houses clubs cost fifty

0:29:45.840 --> 0:29:46.840
<v Speaker 4>two hundred dollars for.

0:29:46.760 --> 0:29:48.160
<v Speaker 8>Those age twenties.

0:29:47.800 --> 0:29:50.400
<v Speaker 4>Much know, there's like in New York City, there are

0:29:50.480 --> 0:29:54.960
<v Speaker 4>so many good, really old, high quality clubs to join,

0:29:55.320 --> 0:29:57.120
<v Speaker 4>and then there are a handful of newer clubs like

0:29:57.160 --> 0:30:00.360
<v Speaker 4>the Core Club for example, which is also very good.

0:30:01.280 --> 0:30:03.040
<v Speaker 3>I don't know where Soho House fits in.

0:30:03.240 --> 0:30:05.520
<v Speaker 8>Oh No, so house is huge, is it? Yes?

0:30:05.720 --> 0:30:07.920
<v Speaker 1>Like you walk in and for the young very special

0:30:08.160 --> 0:30:10.160
<v Speaker 1>like no, it's a really on the list and there's

0:30:10.160 --> 0:30:10.960
<v Speaker 1>no stuffiness.

0:30:11.040 --> 0:30:13.960
<v Speaker 8>No, no, it's a whole you like, stuffy.

0:30:15.320 --> 0:30:15.680
<v Speaker 2>Is huge.

0:30:15.800 --> 0:30:16.040
<v Speaker 8>Yeah.

0:30:16.080 --> 0:30:17.840
<v Speaker 4>All right, least Matela, thank you very much. That's the

0:30:17.880 --> 0:30:19.160
<v Speaker 4>newspapers with least Mitelo.

0:30:19.400 --> 0:30:23.840
<v Speaker 2>This is the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast, available on Apple, Spotify

0:30:24.000 --> 0:30:27.600
<v Speaker 2>and anywhere else you get your podcasts. Listen live each

0:30:27.640 --> 0:30:31.080
<v Speaker 2>weekday seven to ten am Eastern on Bloomberg dot com,

0:30:31.200 --> 0:30:34.800
<v Speaker 2>the iHeartRadio app tune In, and the Bloomberg Business app.

0:30:35.080 --> 0:30:38.120
<v Speaker 2>You can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube

0:30:38.400 --> 0:30:40.240
<v Speaker 2>and always on the Bloomberg terminal