WEBVTT - ECB Chief Economist Philip Lane Talks European Inflation

0:00:02.759 --> 0:00:07.240
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news.

0:00:08.039 --> 0:00:10.800
<v Speaker 2>So here's the LISUS this morning, the ECB warning tarras

0:00:10.840 --> 0:00:14.720
<v Speaker 2>may be more disinflationary than inflationary for Europe. This after

0:00:14.760 --> 0:00:17.639
<v Speaker 2>President Trump said he's confident of reaching a trade deal

0:00:17.840 --> 0:00:20.079
<v Speaker 2>with the EU. Joining us around the table here in

0:00:20.120 --> 0:00:22.479
<v Speaker 2>our studio in Washington, d C. The Chief economist of

0:00:22.480 --> 0:00:24.759
<v Speaker 2>the European Central Bank, Philip Blank. Philip is good to

0:00:24.760 --> 0:00:26.680
<v Speaker 2>see you, sir, Good morning, Thanks for being able to

0:00:26.760 --> 0:00:29.160
<v Speaker 2>hear in Washington. So the Government Council meeting, I imagine,

0:00:29.240 --> 0:00:31.280
<v Speaker 2>was very different this time around than a number of

0:00:31.280 --> 0:00:33.559
<v Speaker 2>months ago when you walked into that room and presented

0:00:33.760 --> 0:00:36.400
<v Speaker 2>changes to the economy. What did you tell a team?

0:00:36.440 --> 0:00:38.440
<v Speaker 1>Sure, I mean I think it was a gear change

0:00:38.640 --> 0:00:43.120
<v Speaker 1>for several reasons. So of course, our core business has

0:00:43.120 --> 0:00:45.040
<v Speaker 1>been to try and get inflation back down from a

0:00:45.159 --> 0:00:49.280
<v Speaker 1>high number to our targets. So I think there was

0:00:49.320 --> 0:00:52.720
<v Speaker 1>a milestone in this meeting in the sense of the

0:00:52.760 --> 0:00:56.080
<v Speaker 1>most recent data had come in quite low. What we'd

0:00:56.120 --> 0:00:59.000
<v Speaker 1>been waiting for services inflation to kind of drop, and

0:00:59.040 --> 0:01:02.920
<v Speaker 1>it has been dropped. And then we had surveys showing

0:01:02.920 --> 0:01:06.360
<v Speaker 1>that basically the weight dynamic this year and in twenty

0:01:06.400 --> 0:01:10.520
<v Speaker 1>six is lower than we expected. So basically, if you like,

0:01:10.600 --> 0:01:14.039
<v Speaker 1>if you clear the table about the historic issue, are

0:01:14.080 --> 0:01:17.360
<v Speaker 1>we safely bringing inflation back to target? I think a

0:01:17.400 --> 0:01:19.360
<v Speaker 1>lot it's not entirely settled, but a lot of it

0:01:19.400 --> 0:01:22.399
<v Speaker 1>is settled. So the gear change was of course, now

0:01:22.560 --> 0:01:25.919
<v Speaker 1>we have new things to talk about, and really since

0:01:26.920 --> 0:01:30.440
<v Speaker 1>all the way back to last summer, trade policy uncertainty

0:01:30.920 --> 0:01:33.759
<v Speaker 1>has been part of what we've had to talk about.

0:01:34.400 --> 0:01:37.560
<v Speaker 1>But we still have trade policy uncertainty, but we also

0:01:37.600 --> 0:01:41.720
<v Speaker 1>have trade policy news. You know, lots has happened that

0:01:42.080 --> 0:01:45.800
<v Speaker 1>the and then the other element of what we've seen

0:01:46.240 --> 0:01:48.320
<v Speaker 1>is of course, and that happened, by the way, like

0:01:48.400 --> 0:01:51.200
<v Speaker 1>a day or two before our March meeting, was a

0:01:51.320 --> 0:01:55.240
<v Speaker 1>German break through and fiscal policy, so we already had

0:01:55.280 --> 0:01:59.160
<v Speaker 1>that if you like, in the early incarnation at the

0:01:59.160 --> 0:02:02.840
<v Speaker 1>March meeting. We know more now, but it's still, you know,

0:02:02.880 --> 0:02:04.920
<v Speaker 1>in terms of what the other European countries are going

0:02:04.960 --> 0:02:09.560
<v Speaker 1>to do, it's something that's still in discussion. So what

0:02:09.600 --> 0:02:11.520
<v Speaker 1>I would say if you put all of that together,

0:02:11.760 --> 0:02:14.760
<v Speaker 1>and I think you're probably hearing this from various colleagues

0:02:14.800 --> 0:02:17.720
<v Speaker 1>and other people this week, is if I take a

0:02:17.720 --> 0:02:21.919
<v Speaker 1>longer term perspective, and the IMF in their publications this week,

0:02:22.160 --> 0:02:24.440
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the data go out to twenty thirty.

0:02:25.000 --> 0:02:28.160
<v Speaker 1>If I take a twenty thirty perspective, you know, I

0:02:28.200 --> 0:02:30.880
<v Speaker 1>think there's a lot of grants to have a renewed

0:02:30.919 --> 0:02:36.799
<v Speaker 1>optimism that essentially, with more fiscal support, the credibility of

0:02:36.880 --> 0:02:39.280
<v Speaker 1>delivering our two percent target on a kind of long

0:02:39.360 --> 0:02:43.440
<v Speaker 1>term basis is stronger. The case for the European economy

0:02:43.960 --> 0:02:47.720
<v Speaker 1>to be more resilient, to grow from a domestic source,

0:02:47.960 --> 0:02:53.320
<v Speaker 1>not just from running a big export machine, is more credible.

0:02:54.120 --> 0:02:56.120
<v Speaker 1>But of course we have to navigate from where we

0:02:56.160 --> 0:03:00.800
<v Speaker 1>are now. Where As you said in your intro, immediately

0:03:00.840 --> 0:03:03.760
<v Speaker 1>in the short term, the way it's playing out with

0:03:03.960 --> 0:03:09.000
<v Speaker 1>euro appreciation, with a big drop in energy prices, the

0:03:09.200 --> 0:03:14.760
<v Speaker 1>disinflatory forces are there. But I would say maybe the question,

0:03:14.760 --> 0:03:17.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, I wouldn't load it all on the trade policy.

0:03:17.639 --> 0:03:20.680
<v Speaker 1>What we also see now as a portfolio shift. So

0:03:20.720 --> 0:03:24.120
<v Speaker 1>there's a clear portfolio shift going on, which is I

0:03:24.120 --> 0:03:27.280
<v Speaker 1>think the way you can reconcile euro appreciation in the

0:03:27.320 --> 0:03:29.720
<v Speaker 1>middle of this trade discussion.

0:03:29.720 --> 0:03:31.160
<v Speaker 2>As you know, Philip, that sort of begs the question

0:03:31.200 --> 0:03:33.359
<v Speaker 2>why you don't act more aggressively. Does that give you

0:03:33.400 --> 0:03:35.040
<v Speaker 2>the space to act more preemptively.

0:03:35.440 --> 0:03:39.760
<v Speaker 1>Well, I think a very important narrative we had last week,

0:03:39.960 --> 0:03:43.960
<v Speaker 1>and it was repeated threat to Manto policy statement was resilience.

0:03:44.640 --> 0:03:48.000
<v Speaker 1>What we're seeing is the European economy growing. Two years

0:03:48.040 --> 0:03:51.400
<v Speaker 1>ago it was kind of more stagnating. So we said

0:03:51.440 --> 0:03:54.880
<v Speaker 1>the European economy is going to recover. We saw, you know,

0:03:55.000 --> 0:03:58.920
<v Speaker 1>modest but still market recovery last year is around zero nine.

0:03:59.400 --> 0:04:02.320
<v Speaker 1>We have zero nine written down in March for this year,

0:04:03.040 --> 0:04:08.400
<v Speaker 1>and that's basically because with incomes going up, consumption shough

0:04:08.480 --> 0:04:12.240
<v Speaker 1>to cover with our multi policy and the general improvement

0:04:12.240 --> 0:04:16.440
<v Speaker 1>of the economy, investments should recover with more government support.

0:04:16.640 --> 0:04:20.720
<v Speaker 1>So all the domestic engines are there. So what you

0:04:20.839 --> 0:04:24.400
<v Speaker 1>have to think about is all of that, if you like,

0:04:24.760 --> 0:04:28.920
<v Speaker 1>is saying that the economies should be growing, even marking

0:04:29.000 --> 0:04:32.719
<v Speaker 1>down some trait negative and this is why we're not

0:04:32.839 --> 0:04:36.880
<v Speaker 1>in a situation where we see some dramatic change in

0:04:36.920 --> 0:04:39.760
<v Speaker 1>the external environment or in fries pressures and so on.

0:04:40.040 --> 0:04:42.240
<v Speaker 1>So steady is okay? Hold on a second, are you

0:04:42.320 --> 0:04:44.880
<v Speaker 1>saying that what we've seen with respect to US policy

0:04:44.880 --> 0:04:49.040
<v Speaker 1>and the uncertainty isn't increasing the chance of recession materially

0:04:49.440 --> 0:04:54.120
<v Speaker 1>for the euroregion. Well, I mean, I think our overriding seam,

0:04:54.160 --> 0:04:56.839
<v Speaker 1>of course is uncertainty. And let's not get ahead of

0:04:56.839 --> 0:04:59.200
<v Speaker 1>ourselves in terms of being too sure about any any

0:04:59.240 --> 0:05:02.279
<v Speaker 1>path for the ecomon But I think the message is

0:05:02.320 --> 0:05:05.040
<v Speaker 1>but it's not me dreaming it up. If you look

0:05:05.080 --> 0:05:08.440
<v Speaker 1>at the external watchers, if you look at the IMF,

0:05:08.800 --> 0:05:12.359
<v Speaker 1>it's fairly modest mark dance on the growth trade for

0:05:12.360 --> 0:05:16.560
<v Speaker 1>the European economy. The US, of course has a major

0:05:16.640 --> 0:05:19.839
<v Speaker 1>trade policy issue all with the world. We have a

0:05:19.839 --> 0:05:23.160
<v Speaker 1>trade policy issue with the US. The US is an

0:05:23.160 --> 0:05:26.840
<v Speaker 1>important trading partner, but it's not our only trading partner,

0:05:27.240 --> 0:05:30.360
<v Speaker 1>so directionally it is a markdown. There is a markdown,

0:05:30.839 --> 0:05:33.839
<v Speaker 1>but it's important to say it's a markdown from a

0:05:33.920 --> 0:05:37.119
<v Speaker 1>growth trade around zero nine to a little bit less.

0:05:37.920 --> 0:05:40.279
<v Speaker 1>Let's see in the coming weeks how much less. And

0:05:40.400 --> 0:05:41.960
<v Speaker 1>I think if you look at the surveys this week,

0:05:42.480 --> 0:05:46.520
<v Speaker 1>the surveys have elements of people being concerned, but they

0:05:46.520 --> 0:05:50.599
<v Speaker 1>also have elements Right now, we're busy. Manufacturing is a

0:05:50.600 --> 0:05:53.080
<v Speaker 1>bit busier than it was. That could be a little

0:05:53.080 --> 0:05:56.000
<v Speaker 1>bit of front running of taris for sure, but it's

0:05:56.120 --> 0:06:01.280
<v Speaker 1>also remember the recovery narrative. Europe has been stagnating. The

0:06:01.320 --> 0:06:03.560
<v Speaker 1>American economy has grown quickly, So if you like, in

0:06:03.640 --> 0:06:07.159
<v Speaker 1>terms of if there is room for the American ecomomy

0:06:07.200 --> 0:06:10.240
<v Speaker 1>to decelerate, and then trade policy is adding to that,

0:06:10.920 --> 0:06:13.760
<v Speaker 1>what I'm saying to you is essentially the baseline for

0:06:13.800 --> 0:06:16.960
<v Speaker 1>Europe was to grow a bit more quickly, and so

0:06:17.000 --> 0:06:20.040
<v Speaker 1>the resilience is there. You can take a trade hit

0:06:20.720 --> 0:06:25.960
<v Speaker 1>without going to using that word which I of that

0:06:26.080 --> 0:06:28.880
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned. You mentioned, of course that Europe has more

0:06:28.880 --> 0:06:29.760
<v Speaker 1>trading partners.

0:06:29.480 --> 0:06:30.360
<v Speaker 2>Than the United States.

0:06:30.400 --> 0:06:32.400
<v Speaker 1>How concerned are you that if the walls keep going

0:06:32.480 --> 0:06:34.919
<v Speaker 1>up in the United States, China will have to just

0:06:35.000 --> 0:06:37.760
<v Speaker 1>dump somewhere. It's going to be on the continent. So

0:06:38.680 --> 0:06:42.560
<v Speaker 1>I think directly an element with that must be you know,

0:06:42.680 --> 0:06:46.720
<v Speaker 1>must be expected. But I think you know, China fully

0:06:46.800 --> 0:06:51.239
<v Speaker 1>understands that. You know, if you listen to their policy

0:06:51.279 --> 0:06:55.320
<v Speaker 1>announcements they're going to do. Their focus is on improving

0:06:55.360 --> 0:06:58.560
<v Speaker 1>domestic demand. So in terms of the re orientation from

0:06:58.560 --> 0:07:05.560
<v Speaker 1>the US, fairmount to domestic demand some amount to around

0:07:05.560 --> 0:07:08.359
<v Speaker 1>the world. But I think also China understands it's a

0:07:08.440 --> 0:07:13.680
<v Speaker 1>large economy and a bit of restraint in exporting may

0:07:13.720 --> 0:07:14.200
<v Speaker 1>make sense.

0:07:14.240 --> 0:07:16.440
<v Speaker 2>For the twenty seconds left, I just wanted to jump in.

0:07:16.520 --> 0:07:20.040
<v Speaker 2>Olie Rain was busy this morning, your governing council partner,

0:07:20.400 --> 0:07:22.160
<v Speaker 2>and he made the point that we should be open

0:07:22.200 --> 0:07:24.200
<v Speaker 2>to larger interest rate cuts. Is that a position that

0:07:24.400 --> 0:07:25.280
<v Speaker 2>you and the team agree with?

0:07:25.440 --> 0:07:28.840
<v Speaker 1>Philosophically, we don't pre commit to any rate path, of course,

0:07:28.880 --> 0:07:32.000
<v Speaker 1>and so this is why again it's important, and I

0:07:32.040 --> 0:07:35.800
<v Speaker 1>think the Government Council, I think, tries hard to maintain

0:07:35.840 --> 0:07:39.040
<v Speaker 1>this is. You can express that in different ways, and

0:07:39.120 --> 0:07:42.760
<v Speaker 1>in particular there's no reason to say we're always going

0:07:42.840 --> 0:07:48.400
<v Speaker 1>to do the default twenty five. Philosophically I agree with that. Okay,

0:07:48.400 --> 0:07:50.120
<v Speaker 1>what I said to you earlier on is right now

0:07:50.360 --> 0:07:54.280
<v Speaker 1>the growth performance I'm sure to be marked down. It's

0:07:54.320 --> 0:07:58.760
<v Speaker 1>still a growing economy with inflation I think to the downside.

0:07:59.000 --> 0:08:00.679
<v Speaker 1>But we don't need too dramatic

0:08:00.720 --> 0:08:03.200
<v Speaker 2>About Philip Lane, the Chafe economist of the e c

0:08:03.360 --> 0:08:03.400
<v Speaker 2>B