WEBVTT - TCW's Rivelle: Cautious on EM Debt This Late In Cycle

0:00:02.640 --> 0:00:05.320
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg PENL Podcast. I'm Paul swing you.

0:00:05.360 --> 0:00:07.680
<v Speaker 1>Along with my co host Lisa Brahma Wicks. Each day

0:00:07.720 --> 0:00:10.240
<v Speaker 1>we bring you the most noteworthy and useful interviews for

0:00:10.280 --> 0:00:12.520
<v Speaker 1>you and your money. Whether at the grocery store or

0:00:12.560 --> 0:00:15.480
<v Speaker 1>the trading floor. Find a Bloomberg Penl podcast on Apple

0:00:15.520 --> 0:00:17.959
<v Speaker 1>podcast or wherever you listen to podcasts, as well as

0:00:17.960 --> 0:00:24.680
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com. Often people say that high yield

0:00:24.680 --> 0:00:28.160
<v Speaker 1>bonds are a leading indicator. They tend to show weakness

0:00:28.520 --> 0:00:32.760
<v Speaker 1>before US equities. If that is still true, there is

0:00:32.920 --> 0:00:36.000
<v Speaker 1>no sign of weakness US hiled bonds of returned nearly

0:00:36.120 --> 0:00:41.479
<v Speaker 1>seven percent in less than three months, of our markets

0:00:41.520 --> 0:00:44.519
<v Speaker 1>overly complacent or they signaling that the good times can

0:00:44.600 --> 0:00:47.080
<v Speaker 1>last a bit longer. Joining us here in our Bloomberg

0:00:47.120 --> 0:00:50.520
<v Speaker 1>Interactive Broker Studios, Tad Ravel, chief investment Officer for fixed

0:00:50.560 --> 0:00:54.840
<v Speaker 1>income at TCW, helping to oversee a hundred billion dollars

0:00:55.360 --> 0:00:58.800
<v Speaker 1>under management normally based in Los Angeles. But you're grace

0:00:58.840 --> 0:01:00.880
<v Speaker 1>in our presence here. Thank you, So, Tad, what do

0:01:00.920 --> 0:01:03.120
<v Speaker 1>you think I mean that this uh six point seven

0:01:03.120 --> 0:01:06.520
<v Speaker 1>percent gain dramatic and indicating that there is not any

0:01:06.560 --> 0:01:09.840
<v Speaker 1>concern about it turning the credit cycle, Well, the headline

0:01:09.880 --> 0:01:12.640
<v Speaker 1>is very impressive, but actually when you look underneath the hood,

0:01:12.720 --> 0:01:15.320
<v Speaker 1>you actually see something a little bit different. In particular,

0:01:15.640 --> 0:01:18.080
<v Speaker 1>you will notice that the triple C category, so the

0:01:18.120 --> 0:01:22.480
<v Speaker 1>lowest tier of junkraded issuers out there, actually hasn't participated.

0:01:22.640 --> 0:01:24.960
<v Speaker 1>So the spreads of triple cs are still I think

0:01:25.000 --> 0:01:28.480
<v Speaker 1>about eight hundred and fifty plus basis points over treasuries

0:01:28.520 --> 0:01:32.280
<v Speaker 1>plus or minus. So that's indicative that the fear level

0:01:32.319 --> 0:01:34.880
<v Speaker 1>that investors experience in the fourth quarter of last year

0:01:35.040 --> 0:01:38.200
<v Speaker 1>hasn't actually been completely dissipated. Must much of the rally

0:01:38.240 --> 0:01:41.880
<v Speaker 1>actually has been The investors are in fact more discriminating

0:01:42.280 --> 0:01:45.759
<v Speaker 1>in the current quarter than we've seen them in periods

0:01:45.959 --> 0:01:49.040
<v Speaker 1>that were similar in terms of high returns, like two

0:01:49.080 --> 0:01:51.920
<v Speaker 1>thousand seventeen, for instance. So it tad given where we

0:01:51.960 --> 0:01:56.080
<v Speaker 1>are in terms of the economic cycle, the credit cycle, Um,

0:01:56.120 --> 0:01:58.160
<v Speaker 1>where are you on the risk curve here? Where do

0:01:58.160 --> 0:02:01.120
<v Speaker 1>you think investors should be going in terms of return? Here?

0:02:01.120 --> 0:02:03.000
<v Speaker 1>How much riot should they be taking? I think you're

0:02:03.000 --> 0:02:05.600
<v Speaker 1>supposed to be defensive, You're supposed to be highgrading your

0:02:05.640 --> 0:02:08.520
<v Speaker 1>your bond portfolio. You're supposed to be focusing on a

0:02:08.600 --> 0:02:12.520
<v Speaker 1>combination of traditional risk off instruments. That would be things

0:02:12.560 --> 0:02:15.480
<v Speaker 1>like agency mortgages with some treasuries built into it, and

0:02:15.520 --> 0:02:18.480
<v Speaker 1>then allocations to what we describe as bendable assets, so

0:02:18.800 --> 0:02:22.600
<v Speaker 1>that would include Triple A rated commercial mortgage backed securities,

0:02:22.680 --> 0:02:26.640
<v Speaker 1>Triple A rated asset backed securities, and UM investment grade credit.

0:02:26.680 --> 0:02:29.760
<v Speaker 1>Provided that you've done your your credit homework properly and

0:02:29.800 --> 0:02:33.640
<v Speaker 1>are properly thinking through and controlling for the for the

0:02:33.680 --> 0:02:36.360
<v Speaker 1>fallen angel risk, what you're not supposed to be doing

0:02:36.760 --> 0:02:40.240
<v Speaker 1>is adopting what we would describe as an early cycle strategy.

0:02:40.480 --> 0:02:44.000
<v Speaker 1>An early cycle strategy would be where you're essentially dipping

0:02:44.040 --> 0:02:47.880
<v Speaker 1>into and making significant allocations two things like high yield,

0:02:47.919 --> 0:02:50.720
<v Speaker 1>emerging markets down the capital structure, taking on a lot

0:02:50.760 --> 0:02:53.639
<v Speaker 1>of financial or operating leverage. You shouldn't be doing that,

0:02:53.880 --> 0:02:56.640
<v Speaker 1>So emerging markets you're not. You're not a fan. Well,

0:02:57.080 --> 0:03:01.359
<v Speaker 1>the the the emerging mark at asset class has many,

0:03:01.400 --> 0:03:04.400
<v Speaker 1>many opportunities in it, obviously, but I think that as

0:03:04.440 --> 0:03:07.200
<v Speaker 1>a as a general statement, it has many of the

0:03:07.280 --> 0:03:10.720
<v Speaker 1>features that are similar to high yield. At the end

0:03:10.720 --> 0:03:14.799
<v Speaker 1>of a cycle, you tend to experience significant downside volatility

0:03:14.880 --> 0:03:19.040
<v Speaker 1>when there is a contraction and credited leveraging environment. So

0:03:19.080 --> 0:03:23.639
<v Speaker 1>how far away are we from a contraction or downturning credit? Well,

0:03:23.680 --> 0:03:25.920
<v Speaker 1>it looks like we were heading there actually just a

0:03:25.960 --> 0:03:29.640
<v Speaker 1>couple of months ago, and then UH Chairman Powell decided that, um,

0:03:29.880 --> 0:03:32.200
<v Speaker 1>we were getting there too fast, and so he decided

0:03:32.440 --> 0:03:34.240
<v Speaker 1>to do something about it. And of course that's the

0:03:34.240 --> 0:03:38.200
<v Speaker 1>whole genesis behind the most recent FED flip flop and

0:03:38.560 --> 0:03:42.200
<v Speaker 1>movement to being patient. So here's the question of the

0:03:42.240 --> 0:03:44.680
<v Speaker 1>day and the question of the cycle, which is can

0:03:44.680 --> 0:03:47.720
<v Speaker 1>the FED ultimately direct the movement of the clouds? Um?

0:03:47.760 --> 0:03:51.280
<v Speaker 1>Are they that skilled and that powerful that they can

0:03:51.280 --> 0:03:54.160
<v Speaker 1>delay the end of the cycle forever um or have

0:03:54.240 --> 0:03:56.800
<v Speaker 1>they simply delayed it for for now? I think we're

0:03:56.840 --> 0:03:58.920
<v Speaker 1>in the camp that says they've delayed it for now.

0:03:59.120 --> 0:04:03.040
<v Speaker 1>And when when does the market essentially decide to in

0:04:03.080 --> 0:04:06.240
<v Speaker 1>effect veto the Fed's decision? Well? Who can say? So

0:04:06.560 --> 0:04:08.680
<v Speaker 1>you talked about the FED flip flopping, and obviously today

0:04:08.680 --> 0:04:11.440
<v Speaker 1>we're going to hear from FED Chairman Pal this afternoon.

0:04:12.200 --> 0:04:14.720
<v Speaker 1>What do you expect to hear that maybe the markets

0:04:15.000 --> 0:04:18.480
<v Speaker 1>not discounting today? Do you expect anything unusual coming out

0:04:18.480 --> 0:04:22.160
<v Speaker 1>of the FED today absolutely not, I think I think

0:04:23.320 --> 0:04:27.800
<v Speaker 1>I think that the bravado with which the FED spoke

0:04:27.839 --> 0:04:30.520
<v Speaker 1>of five months ago right, It was only I think

0:04:30.520 --> 0:04:34.680
<v Speaker 1>in September where Powell said something to the effect we

0:04:34.760 --> 0:04:37.800
<v Speaker 1>are a long way from being being neutral, and we

0:04:37.920 --> 0:04:40.760
<v Speaker 1>got lots of rate rises. We're gonna shrink that balance sheet.

0:04:41.000 --> 0:04:47.120
<v Speaker 1>Look how quickly or how easily a whiff of cold

0:04:47.320 --> 0:04:50.719
<v Speaker 1>winter risk blowing into the markets change the Fed's mind.

0:04:51.080 --> 0:04:53.480
<v Speaker 1>I think that they are going to be very careful

0:04:53.760 --> 0:04:56.719
<v Speaker 1>and measured in what they say today to keep investors

0:04:56.720 --> 0:04:58.520
<v Speaker 1>on the on what day would view as the straight

0:04:58.560 --> 0:05:00.919
<v Speaker 1>and narrow before we let you go. I want to

0:05:00.920 --> 0:05:03.320
<v Speaker 1>get in the weeds a little bit with respect to

0:05:03.720 --> 0:05:06.200
<v Speaker 1>energy high yield bonds because I think that there has

0:05:06.240 --> 0:05:10.000
<v Speaker 1>been a really notable underperformance in this space and there

0:05:10.000 --> 0:05:12.880
<v Speaker 1>have been some huge potholes. I was looking yesterday for example,

0:05:13.200 --> 0:05:16.200
<v Speaker 1>ep Energy, which has more than four billion dollars of

0:05:16.240 --> 0:05:20.840
<v Speaker 1>debt bonds falling forty cents in two days after disappointing earnings.

0:05:21.080 --> 0:05:22.840
<v Speaker 1>Do you think that there are more bankruptcies to come

0:05:22.880 --> 0:05:26.200
<v Speaker 1>in the show patch? Yes, is the short answer, And

0:05:26.640 --> 0:05:30.480
<v Speaker 1>I think that I think that your example is an

0:05:30.520 --> 0:05:34.159
<v Speaker 1>excellent one I think in terms of illustrating the asymmetry

0:05:34.240 --> 0:05:37.040
<v Speaker 1>with which investors are approaching the market, which is that

0:05:37.360 --> 0:05:39.640
<v Speaker 1>all you saw, as far as I know, was a

0:05:39.680 --> 0:05:42.720
<v Speaker 1>disappointing earnings number coming out of the company, and that

0:05:42.800 --> 0:05:46.560
<v Speaker 1>was enough basically to utterly reprice the capital structure of

0:05:46.600 --> 0:05:50.440
<v Speaker 1>the business. So the complacency with which we saw investors

0:05:50.440 --> 0:05:53.279
<v Speaker 1>operate a couple of years ago doesn't really seem to

0:05:53.279 --> 0:05:56.240
<v Speaker 1>be enforced any longer. So ted us or any just

0:05:56.600 --> 0:05:59.799
<v Speaker 1>ten seconds, any area that you're just avoiding, like the plague.

0:06:00.640 --> 0:06:04.320
<v Speaker 1>Uh well, yes, there there are areas to to avoid,

0:06:04.360 --> 0:06:06.279
<v Speaker 1>like to play, but they tend to be they I

0:06:06.279 --> 0:06:08.360
<v Speaker 1>don't want to give you a broad brush stroke. There

0:06:08.400 --> 0:06:12.400
<v Speaker 1>are there are specific areas and subsectors that you should

0:06:12.440 --> 0:06:15.960
<v Speaker 1>be very careful and thoughtful about. Okay, but you're generally

0:06:16.040 --> 0:06:18.600
<v Speaker 1>risk off. That's kind on taking away from from TAT. TAT,

0:06:18.600 --> 0:06:21.400
<v Speaker 1>thank thank you very much. Thank you. Cautious, cautious, It's

0:06:21.400 --> 0:06:24.320
<v Speaker 1>a better way. Tad Ravel, Chief Investment Officer for Fixing

0:06:24.400 --> 0:06:27.240
<v Speaker 1>Comfort t c W. Joining us in our Bloomberg Interactive

0:06:27.240 --> 0:06:46.680
<v Speaker 1>Broker's studio, we thought it'd be very interesting to get

0:06:46.720 --> 0:06:50.080
<v Speaker 1>a sense of what local and regional banks, how they

0:06:50.080 --> 0:06:53.080
<v Speaker 1>are dealing with the current interest rate, of environment, and

0:06:53.120 --> 0:06:56.240
<v Speaker 1>how their customers are reacting. So we're very fortunate today

0:06:56.320 --> 0:06:58.719
<v Speaker 1>to have Frank Sorrentino join us in our Bloomberg eleven

0:06:58.920 --> 0:07:02.359
<v Speaker 1>three oh studios. Frank's chairman and chief executive officer of

0:07:02.440 --> 0:07:04.920
<v Speaker 1>connect One Bank, which trades on the nastack unto the

0:07:04.960 --> 0:07:08.039
<v Speaker 1>symbol c n O B. Frank, thanks very much for

0:07:08.160 --> 0:07:10.720
<v Speaker 1>joining us. Um. I know you have your finger on

0:07:10.760 --> 0:07:12.800
<v Speaker 1>the pulse of kind of where rates are going. That's

0:07:12.840 --> 0:07:15.160
<v Speaker 1>your business. What do you expect to hear from the

0:07:15.200 --> 0:07:17.840
<v Speaker 1>FED today? Well, thanks for having me again, But I

0:07:17.880 --> 0:07:20.600
<v Speaker 1>don't think anyone's expecting any big surprise today. I think

0:07:20.600 --> 0:07:24.000
<v Speaker 1>the FED has done a great job of telegraphing what's

0:07:24.040 --> 0:07:27.400
<v Speaker 1>happening here over the last thirty or sixty days. Uh,

0:07:27.480 --> 0:07:30.080
<v Speaker 1>it's pretty it's pretty clear to me that the FED

0:07:30.200 --> 0:07:32.560
<v Speaker 1>is on pause for right now and and looking for

0:07:32.640 --> 0:07:35.680
<v Speaker 1>some additional information. All right. I want some additional information

0:07:35.680 --> 0:07:37.880
<v Speaker 1>about the housing market in particular, and I know that

0:07:37.920 --> 0:07:41.840
<v Speaker 1>you have quite a long history of expertise in this area.

0:07:41.880 --> 0:07:44.560
<v Speaker 1>You used to actually be a home builder, right, that

0:07:44.680 --> 0:07:47.280
<v Speaker 1>is correct? So what are you seeing right now? I'm

0:07:47.320 --> 0:07:49.480
<v Speaker 1>really having a hard time getting a read on the

0:07:49.560 --> 0:07:52.520
<v Speaker 1>US housing market, whether it's slowing down or whether there

0:07:52.600 --> 0:07:54.920
<v Speaker 1>was just a pause when mortgage rades rose and that

0:07:55.120 --> 0:07:57.720
<v Speaker 1>it's now picking back up. You know, I'll tell you

0:07:57.760 --> 0:08:00.120
<v Speaker 1>I I from what we see from our client Bay Ace,

0:08:00.200 --> 0:08:03.720
<v Speaker 1>and it's really dependent on specific market areas, but certainly

0:08:03.720 --> 0:08:06.280
<v Speaker 1>in the market that connect One represents in the New

0:08:06.360 --> 0:08:10.480
<v Speaker 1>York metro market, we've never really fully recovered from the recession,

0:08:10.560 --> 0:08:15.720
<v Speaker 1>and there's still a lack of available brand new housing

0:08:15.800 --> 0:08:19.800
<v Speaker 1>that's I think is required, and so at various price

0:08:19.880 --> 0:08:23.160
<v Speaker 1>points there is you would you wouldn't believe tremendous demand

0:08:23.280 --> 0:08:26.720
<v Speaker 1>for for that product, and with mortgage rates still close

0:08:26.800 --> 0:08:30.160
<v Speaker 1>to four percent, it's a very compelling time to purchase

0:08:30.200 --> 0:08:34.360
<v Speaker 1>a home. Um, builders just can't find enough property, can't

0:08:34.360 --> 0:08:37.160
<v Speaker 1>put up the product fast enough in certain markets. Now.

0:08:37.360 --> 0:08:39.520
<v Speaker 1>Of course, we keep reading the headlines about some of

0:08:39.559 --> 0:08:42.080
<v Speaker 1>the very very high end real estate that's lagging on

0:08:42.120 --> 0:08:44.480
<v Speaker 1>the marketplace today, but that's not really indicative of what's

0:08:44.480 --> 0:08:47.320
<v Speaker 1>going on across the rest of the country. So, Frank,

0:08:47.400 --> 0:08:50.319
<v Speaker 1>your your your your bank, your institution is a Metro

0:08:50.480 --> 0:08:56.000
<v Speaker 1>New York institution. UM, what are your local, regional, midsize

0:08:56.280 --> 0:09:00.640
<v Speaker 1>customers telling you about just the overall economic community there

0:09:00.720 --> 0:09:04.000
<v Speaker 1>there their willingness to invest in their in their companies. Look,

0:09:04.040 --> 0:09:06.880
<v Speaker 1>people were very nervous as we came into the beginning

0:09:06.920 --> 0:09:09.920
<v Speaker 1>of the year, thought that, uh, the interest rate cycle

0:09:10.000 --> 0:09:11.880
<v Speaker 1>was going to be a runaway train. Rates We're gonna

0:09:11.880 --> 0:09:14.319
<v Speaker 1>go higher, and people started thinking very very hard about

0:09:14.600 --> 0:09:16.800
<v Speaker 1>some of the transactions that they may have been contemplating,

0:09:16.800 --> 0:09:18.520
<v Speaker 1>whether they were going to buy something, invest in their

0:09:18.559 --> 0:09:22.040
<v Speaker 1>companies and additional staff, whatever, I think. But as the

0:09:22.120 --> 0:09:24.560
<v Speaker 1>as the year has unfolded and we're starting to see

0:09:24.600 --> 0:09:26.960
<v Speaker 1>that the Fed has backed up a little bit, and

0:09:27.000 --> 0:09:30.199
<v Speaker 1>we believe now that we're more in a more neutral

0:09:30.320 --> 0:09:34.079
<v Speaker 1>environment relative to interest rates. Our clients are actually bullish

0:09:34.120 --> 0:09:36.600
<v Speaker 1>about where things are today. And you know, this whole

0:09:36.640 --> 0:09:39.080
<v Speaker 1>notion of of climbing a wall a worry, in my opinion,

0:09:39.120 --> 0:09:41.360
<v Speaker 1>is a really good thing. It's making people be very

0:09:41.360 --> 0:09:44.199
<v Speaker 1>thoughtful about every decision that they make. But at the

0:09:44.320 --> 0:09:48.439
<v Speaker 1>end of the day, acquisitions are happening, investment is happening,

0:09:48.559 --> 0:09:51.360
<v Speaker 1>Hiring is happening. The biggest complaint where we're hearing about

0:09:51.440 --> 0:09:55.280
<v Speaker 1>is the availability of qualified staff today. That is hindering

0:09:55.320 --> 0:09:59.240
<v Speaker 1>certain people's growth plans. So so pretty bullish is what

0:09:59.320 --> 0:10:01.880
<v Speaker 1>our clients are are reporting to us, notwithstanding what we're

0:10:01.920 --> 0:10:03.640
<v Speaker 1>reading in the news right or what we're reading in

0:10:03.640 --> 0:10:07.199
<v Speaker 1>the newspaper. So, Frank, you talked about consolidation. There has

0:10:07.240 --> 0:10:10.000
<v Speaker 1>been consolidation in a number of different sectors, including in

0:10:10.000 --> 0:10:12.840
<v Speaker 1>the banking sector. And I know JP Morgan CEO Jamie

0:10:12.920 --> 0:10:15.680
<v Speaker 1>Diamond came out and said he expected quite a bit

0:10:15.720 --> 0:10:19.679
<v Speaker 1>more Bank of America reiterating that from your perspective, connect

0:10:19.679 --> 0:10:24.040
<v Speaker 1>one has about six billion dollars in assets twenty nine locations.

0:10:24.280 --> 0:10:27.560
<v Speaker 1>Are you seeing opportunities for acquisitions or do you think

0:10:27.559 --> 0:10:30.640
<v Speaker 1>that there will be sort of ongoing consolidation that will

0:10:30.640 --> 0:10:33.679
<v Speaker 1>affect you. So, as you know, we've taken advantage of

0:10:33.720 --> 0:10:37.920
<v Speaker 1>the merger and acquisition marketplace. We did a large merger

0:10:38.040 --> 0:10:40.240
<v Speaker 1>of equals back in two thousand fourteen, and we just

0:10:40.280 --> 0:10:42.439
<v Speaker 1>completed a merger at the at the beginning of this year,

0:10:42.520 --> 0:10:46.360
<v Speaker 1>starting on January two, which increased our size. And and yes,

0:10:46.400 --> 0:10:50.400
<v Speaker 1>there is I believe a build up in in the

0:10:50.440 --> 0:10:54.960
<v Speaker 1>desire for smaller banks to want to get together, uh

0:10:55.000 --> 0:10:57.480
<v Speaker 1>in order to share the expense base that's required to

0:10:57.520 --> 0:11:00.560
<v Speaker 1>run a financial institution today. And when we look at

0:11:00.679 --> 0:11:02.679
<v Speaker 1>what the marketplace looks like today. You know, as I

0:11:02.720 --> 0:11:05.640
<v Speaker 1>said before, twenty years ago there were some twenty thousand banks.

0:11:05.640 --> 0:11:08.560
<v Speaker 1>There's five thousand banks today. I think we're headed very rapidly, too,

0:11:08.600 --> 0:11:12.560
<v Speaker 1>closer to three. So, Frank, the news that Amazon was

0:11:12.720 --> 0:11:15.959
<v Speaker 1>coming to Queens and then not coming to Queens As

0:11:15.960 --> 0:11:19.400
<v Speaker 1>a New York metro lender, what do you take away

0:11:19.400 --> 0:11:21.760
<v Speaker 1>from that as a as it relates to is New

0:11:21.840 --> 0:11:24.640
<v Speaker 1>York open for business? So look, I think New York

0:11:24.760 --> 0:11:27.600
<v Speaker 1>is definitely open for business. I'm not sure. I don't

0:11:27.600 --> 0:11:30.040
<v Speaker 1>want to get into the political discourse about what may

0:11:30.120 --> 0:11:32.160
<v Speaker 1>or may not have happened or what was or wasn't said.

0:11:32.200 --> 0:11:35.320
<v Speaker 1>But at the end of the day, um, every major

0:11:35.400 --> 0:11:38.200
<v Speaker 1>company is investing here in New York. And whether it

0:11:38.320 --> 0:11:42.120
<v Speaker 1>is Amazon, and notwithstanding what you know the the HQ

0:11:42.320 --> 0:11:45.960
<v Speaker 1>two conversation, but they're investing in New York. Google's investing

0:11:45.960 --> 0:11:48.760
<v Speaker 1>in New York, Facebook, all the technology companies, all the

0:11:48.800 --> 0:11:54.080
<v Speaker 1>financial institutions. Uh, there is a tremendous amount of investment

0:11:54.200 --> 0:11:57.559
<v Speaker 1>coming into this area. We're feeling it, we're seeing it,

0:11:58.080 --> 0:12:00.680
<v Speaker 1>and uh, I think it's a big positive for New York,

0:12:00.720 --> 0:12:03.200
<v Speaker 1>and I would say today New York is definitely still

0:12:03.200 --> 0:12:06.960
<v Speaker 1>open for business. Just lastly here, I'm curious about consumer

0:12:07.000 --> 0:12:10.880
<v Speaker 1>confidence because this has sort of been an ongoing strength

0:12:11.320 --> 0:12:14.360
<v Speaker 1>of of the market that consumers just continue to be confident.

0:12:14.400 --> 0:12:17.679
<v Speaker 1>Are you seeing any potential headwinds to that at this point?

0:12:17.960 --> 0:12:20.040
<v Speaker 1>You know? Again, I think this wall of worry concept

0:12:20.160 --> 0:12:22.440
<v Speaker 1>is is something that keeps coming up. And when rates

0:12:22.480 --> 0:12:25.400
<v Speaker 1>started to run up quickly at the end of last

0:12:25.480 --> 0:12:27.839
<v Speaker 1>year or by the end of last year, I think

0:12:27.880 --> 0:12:30.840
<v Speaker 1>that really put a little ding in consumer confidence and

0:12:30.880 --> 0:12:33.600
<v Speaker 1>what was coming down the pike, uh, you know later on.

0:12:33.920 --> 0:12:35.640
<v Speaker 1>I think as we stand here today, though, I think

0:12:35.640 --> 0:12:38.040
<v Speaker 1>the consumer feels pretty good and is out there spending.

0:12:39.000 --> 0:12:41.240
<v Speaker 1>Frank Sorrentino, thank you so much for being with us.

0:12:41.360 --> 0:12:45.160
<v Speaker 1>Always wonderful having you on. Frank Sorrentino is chairman and

0:12:45.200 --> 0:12:49.160
<v Speaker 1>chief executive officer of Connect One Bank based in Englewood Cliffs,

0:12:49.280 --> 0:12:51.720
<v Speaker 1>New Jersey. He is joining us here today in our

0:12:51.760 --> 0:12:56.440
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Bloomberg Interactive Broker studios in New York. Let's give

0:12:56.480 --> 0:12:59.079
<v Speaker 1>you a sense of what is happening in markets ahead

0:12:59.080 --> 0:13:02.560
<v Speaker 1>of that FED meeting. The answer nothing, not very much

0:13:02.600 --> 0:13:04.880
<v Speaker 1>at all. The markets are pretty much flat say that

0:13:05.040 --> 0:13:06.800
<v Speaker 1>for quite some time, haven't we And and then this

0:13:06.880 --> 0:13:08.960
<v Speaker 1>is sort of to me one of the big question

0:13:09.000 --> 0:13:12.240
<v Speaker 1>marks in markets today, which is, uh, there has been

0:13:12.320 --> 0:13:15.240
<v Speaker 1>such a reduction in volatility at this point that a

0:13:15.240 --> 0:13:18.240
<v Speaker 1>growing number of analysts are saying that it does sort

0:13:18.240 --> 0:13:22.839
<v Speaker 1>of foretell some kind of broader whiplash akin to Taper

0:13:22.920 --> 0:13:25.840
<v Speaker 1>tantrum when we saw volatility shrink to the same kinds

0:13:25.840 --> 0:13:43.560
<v Speaker 1>of degree. Well, there certainly is a lot of news

0:13:43.600 --> 0:13:46.440
<v Speaker 1>out of the auto industry today, including a bmwes profit

0:13:46.480 --> 0:13:49.440
<v Speaker 1>warning which knock that stock down five and also news

0:13:49.440 --> 0:13:51.720
<v Speaker 1>that a Ford Motor company where the company plans to

0:13:51.920 --> 0:13:55.320
<v Speaker 1>spend about nine million dollars and higher about nine workers

0:13:55.320 --> 0:13:58.840
<v Speaker 1>to build electric and self driving vehicles in Michigan while

0:13:58.880 --> 0:14:02.400
<v Speaker 1>moving production of a small commercial van to Mexico from Europe.

0:14:02.800 --> 0:14:04.880
<v Speaker 1>I mus stick through those issues, we bring in and

0:14:04.920 --> 0:14:07.880
<v Speaker 1>welcome David Welch. David is the Detroit bureau chief for

0:14:07.920 --> 0:14:11.360
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg News, joining us from the Detroit bureau. David, Welcome.

0:14:11.559 --> 0:14:14.560
<v Speaker 1>Let's start with that Ford news. How big of a

0:14:14.679 --> 0:14:17.120
<v Speaker 1>news item is that for Ford? How much teer is this?

0:14:18.160 --> 0:14:21.200
<v Speaker 1>Because this is pretty big because all we've heard about

0:14:21.280 --> 0:14:24.560
<v Speaker 1>recently from the car companies is cutting jobs, cutting back.

0:14:25.560 --> 0:14:28.640
<v Speaker 1>Even the BMW news you mentioned is sort of kicking

0:14:28.640 --> 0:14:31.040
<v Speaker 1>off a big austerity program for them to get their

0:14:31.040 --> 0:14:34.720
<v Speaker 1>profits in line. Everybody's just cutting jobs out, whether it

0:14:34.720 --> 0:14:39.000
<v Speaker 1>be white Cower engineers or blue cour assemblers, uh, in

0:14:39.040 --> 0:14:42.720
<v Speaker 1>the areas where they make conventional gasoline powered cars. Um.

0:14:43.600 --> 0:14:45.440
<v Speaker 1>So you've got a couple of things going on with Ford.

0:14:45.480 --> 0:14:47.560
<v Speaker 1>Not only is it interesting that the writing jobs, it's

0:14:47.600 --> 0:14:50.960
<v Speaker 1>quite a few of them, a lot uh. Last week,

0:14:51.000 --> 0:14:53.120
<v Speaker 1>Gentle Motors said they're going to hire a thousand people

0:14:53.160 --> 0:14:57.080
<v Speaker 1>at its Cruise Automation subsidiary that makes self driving software

0:14:57.080 --> 0:15:00.000
<v Speaker 1>and technology. So Okay, the bottom line here is if

0:15:00.080 --> 0:15:02.840
<v Speaker 1>you make electric cars, if you make self driving cars,

0:15:03.360 --> 0:15:05.280
<v Speaker 1>that's a good place to be. If you're an engineer

0:15:05.320 --> 0:15:08.840
<v Speaker 1>who releases brake calipers, or you're an assembler of gasoling

0:15:08.880 --> 0:15:12.560
<v Speaker 1>power sudans is you're in trouble. And and that's what's

0:15:12.560 --> 0:15:15.680
<v Speaker 1>really going on. But what Ford is saying hiring nine

0:15:16.080 --> 0:15:18.600
<v Speaker 1>people for an under used plan near Detroit to make

0:15:18.600 --> 0:15:21.360
<v Speaker 1>electric cars, that's a lot of people, said, tells us

0:15:21.360 --> 0:15:23.360
<v Speaker 1>they're going to be making a lot of evs. It

0:15:23.440 --> 0:15:27.080
<v Speaker 1>also tells us that Ford is making quite an interesting

0:15:27.520 --> 0:15:31.440
<v Speaker 1>public relations moves announcing this the same day that President

0:15:31.480 --> 0:15:35.040
<v Speaker 1>Trump visits an Ohio tank plant after a sharp criticism

0:15:35.040 --> 0:15:37.920
<v Speaker 1>of General Motors. How much is this sort of politically

0:15:38.040 --> 0:15:41.920
<v Speaker 1>motivated as far as the timing goes, I would say

0:15:42.080 --> 0:15:46.480
<v Speaker 1>the timing of the announcement absolutely. Now for GM, all

0:15:46.520 --> 0:15:48.800
<v Speaker 1>the car makers, they don't just flick a switch on

0:15:48.880 --> 0:15:50.680
<v Speaker 1>and say we're going to add jobs or do something

0:15:50.800 --> 0:15:53.000
<v Speaker 1>at a plant overnight. So this has been planned for

0:15:53.040 --> 0:15:55.320
<v Speaker 1>some time because they had to engineer the vehicles. But

0:15:56.840 --> 0:16:00.360
<v Speaker 1>on the eve of or i should say, them warning

0:16:00.400 --> 0:16:03.680
<v Speaker 1>of an evening rally President Trump is having after he

0:16:03.760 --> 0:16:08.000
<v Speaker 1>spent the weekend bashing General Motors overcutting jobs in Ohio. Yeah,

0:16:08.040 --> 0:16:10.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, this is Ford's way of kind of sticking

0:16:10.680 --> 0:16:14.200
<v Speaker 1>uh sticking it in, uh the knife into their crosstown rifle.

0:16:14.240 --> 0:16:18.000
<v Speaker 1>I think, and also look early in Trump's presidency, he

0:16:18.120 --> 0:16:21.920
<v Speaker 1>really was beating up Forward for not producing enough in

0:16:21.920 --> 0:16:24.240
<v Speaker 1>the US, and GM kind of got a free pass

0:16:24.280 --> 0:16:27.040
<v Speaker 1>for a while, even though GM has more factories and

0:16:26.840 --> 0:16:30.320
<v Speaker 1>and makes more vehicles in Mexico than Ford does. Now

0:16:30.360 --> 0:16:33.600
<v Speaker 1>that that Ford is h is kind of you know,

0:16:34.120 --> 0:16:36.600
<v Speaker 1>in good stead with the president over adding jobs, why

0:16:36.600 --> 0:16:39.720
<v Speaker 1>not make hay out of it, especially when GM's the

0:16:39.720 --> 0:16:43.560
<v Speaker 1>one getting the beating these days. But from a corporate perspective,

0:16:43.840 --> 0:16:46.640
<v Speaker 1>is Ford doing the right thing? Ford chairs down two

0:16:46.640 --> 0:16:49.760
<v Speaker 1>point two percent right now, I'm wondering. This comes after

0:16:49.840 --> 0:16:53.160
<v Speaker 1>BMW issued a profit warning saying that earnings will fault

0:16:53.160 --> 0:16:56.400
<v Speaker 1>well below last year's level, siting, among other things, the

0:16:56.480 --> 0:16:59.200
<v Speaker 1>cost of making electrical vehicles. I mean, how much is

0:16:59.240 --> 0:17:02.760
<v Speaker 1>it not paying off yet? This is the problem that

0:17:02.800 --> 0:17:06.399
<v Speaker 1>car companies have is you have to make electric cars

0:17:06.440 --> 0:17:10.199
<v Speaker 1>because Tesla is driving this whole thing where governments and

0:17:10.280 --> 0:17:14.600
<v Speaker 1>increasingly consumers want evs. Now where they're going to write.

0:17:14.640 --> 0:17:17.400
<v Speaker 1>Not every consumer does, but that's where the market is going,

0:17:17.400 --> 0:17:21.200
<v Speaker 1>whether it's from a regulatory standpoint or eventually, uh from

0:17:21.200 --> 0:17:23.879
<v Speaker 1>a consumer standpoint. Problems winner consumer is really going to

0:17:23.920 --> 0:17:25.280
<v Speaker 1>be buying a lot of these? And when will these

0:17:25.280 --> 0:17:28.639
<v Speaker 1>cars make money? GM says that it's next round of

0:17:28.760 --> 0:17:31.520
<v Speaker 1>evs will make money starting in about They say they'll

0:17:31.560 --> 0:17:34.159
<v Speaker 1>be profitable. Will they be as profitable as the current vehicles?

0:17:34.240 --> 0:17:37.400
<v Speaker 1>Investors are dubious? So in the cvous investments, they know

0:17:37.720 --> 0:17:40.240
<v Speaker 1>that the car companies have to do this, but that

0:17:40.280 --> 0:17:42.920
<v Speaker 1>doesn't really help them. It doesn't help investors because they're

0:17:43.200 --> 0:17:45.320
<v Speaker 1>they're worried they can make any money on these vehicles,

0:17:45.359 --> 0:17:47.200
<v Speaker 1>and if they do, it'll be lower margins, So why

0:17:47.240 --> 0:17:50.080
<v Speaker 1>should they put their money elsewhere? Very easy for investors

0:17:50.080 --> 0:17:52.200
<v Speaker 1>to say, hey, you know what, let's let these guys

0:17:52.200 --> 0:17:55.160
<v Speaker 1>start making evs and see if it hurts or doesn't hurt,

0:17:55.200 --> 0:17:57.040
<v Speaker 1>or even helps the bottom line. We'll put our money

0:17:57.119 --> 0:17:59.359
<v Speaker 1>somewhere else while that whole thing is playing out this

0:17:59.600 --> 0:18:02.600
<v Speaker 1>interim period here when everybody is investing in self driving

0:18:02.600 --> 0:18:06.440
<v Speaker 1>cars or electric cars waiting for those businesses to pay off.

0:18:07.200 --> 0:18:10.600
<v Speaker 1>It's gonna be tough for them to deal with investors

0:18:11.440 --> 0:18:13.560
<v Speaker 1>in this time because it's a lot of money being spent.

0:18:13.600 --> 0:18:16.040
<v Speaker 1>You're not going to see return on maybe for several years,

0:18:16.080 --> 0:18:18.480
<v Speaker 1>maybe for a decade for some of this stuff. So, David,

0:18:18.520 --> 0:18:22.080
<v Speaker 1>where is Ford Motor Company relative to its peers in

0:18:22.160 --> 0:18:25.280
<v Speaker 1>terms of its electric and self driving vehicles from a

0:18:25.320 --> 0:18:28.160
<v Speaker 1>competitive perspective? To look at what's on the market now,

0:18:28.240 --> 0:18:31.760
<v Speaker 1>they really they have more hybrids than they have pe evs.

0:18:32.359 --> 0:18:37.360
<v Speaker 1>It's really Tesla, General Motors, Oh Nissan to a certain degree,

0:18:37.640 --> 0:18:39.480
<v Speaker 1>they have an EV out there. It's it's not a

0:18:39.520 --> 0:18:41.479
<v Speaker 1>great one in terms of battery range, but they've been

0:18:41.480 --> 0:18:43.760
<v Speaker 1>in that business for quite a while. Those are the

0:18:43.760 --> 0:18:46.240
<v Speaker 1>three main players. The German carmakers are coming out with

0:18:46.280 --> 0:18:48.720
<v Speaker 1>a lot of electric vehicles in the next year or two.

0:18:48.760 --> 0:18:51.440
<v Speaker 1>So you're going to see a wave from the what's

0:18:51.440 --> 0:18:55.760
<v Speaker 1>called the Porsche of Volkswagen uh combine, you'll see how

0:18:55.840 --> 0:18:59.000
<v Speaker 1>these Volkswagen's Porsche evs coming out there. They're already taking

0:18:59.119 --> 0:19:02.280
<v Speaker 1>orders I think on the por should taken EV so

0:19:02.800 --> 0:19:06.200
<v Speaker 1>uh words, kind of trailing behind those players right there.

0:19:06.280 --> 0:19:09.000
<v Speaker 1>But the fact that they're they're going to be staffing

0:19:09.040 --> 0:19:11.439
<v Speaker 1>this plant Uptotia, that they're they're going to be racing

0:19:11.440 --> 0:19:13.719
<v Speaker 1>and catching up pretty quickly, broadening out a little bit

0:19:13.720 --> 0:19:17.360
<v Speaker 1>beyond electric vehicles. I'm wondering BMW's profit warning comes. It's

0:19:17.359 --> 0:19:20.200
<v Speaker 1>sort of a tenuous time for the auto industry at large.

0:19:20.480 --> 0:19:24.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm wondering how concerning it is that they did say

0:19:24.240 --> 0:19:27.480
<v Speaker 1>that earnings would fall so far below last year's level,

0:19:27.680 --> 0:19:31.120
<v Speaker 1>at the same time as Nissan saying that it's it's

0:19:31.200 --> 0:19:33.879
<v Speaker 1>not going to necessarily see as much of an expansion

0:19:34.240 --> 0:19:38.040
<v Speaker 1>in China as it had previously thought, Yeah, there's a

0:19:38.440 --> 0:19:42.199
<v Speaker 1>there's a kitchen sink aspect to what the BMW tourist. Right,

0:19:42.840 --> 0:19:44.879
<v Speaker 1>everybody has to invest a lot of money in cars

0:19:45.040 --> 0:19:46.960
<v Speaker 1>and in electric cars and our timmy right now, and

0:19:46.960 --> 0:19:49.959
<v Speaker 1>it's costing them and in the netting of return. So

0:19:50.119 --> 0:19:52.439
<v Speaker 1>we we we, you know, we talked about that and

0:19:52.480 --> 0:19:54.960
<v Speaker 1>that that was a big piece of what BMW said

0:19:55.000 --> 0:19:58.160
<v Speaker 1>this morning, that that those costs are are really hurting

0:19:58.160 --> 0:20:01.080
<v Speaker 1>their bottom line. So it a pretty big deal from

0:20:01.080 --> 0:20:04.199
<v Speaker 1>that perspective. Now, I think they're doing this at a

0:20:04.240 --> 0:20:06.840
<v Speaker 1>time when they know the markets are getting soft. China

0:20:06.880 --> 0:20:09.280
<v Speaker 1>took a step back last year and it's still kind

0:20:09.280 --> 0:20:12.760
<v Speaker 1>of uneasy. The US still very strong levels historically, but

0:20:12.920 --> 0:20:15.800
<v Speaker 1>still stepping backwards. And the other markets, the emerging markets

0:20:15.800 --> 0:20:20.240
<v Speaker 1>where and sees growth, places like South America, Brazil, especially

0:20:20.680 --> 0:20:23.520
<v Speaker 1>India and Russia. Just a lot of reasons that that

0:20:23.600 --> 0:20:26.560
<v Speaker 1>things aren't growing. There are a lot of instability either

0:20:26.600 --> 0:20:29.600
<v Speaker 1>with infrastructure in the case of India, politics with Russia.

0:20:29.920 --> 0:20:31.560
<v Speaker 1>So no one's really seen a lot of growth in

0:20:31.560 --> 0:20:34.840
<v Speaker 1>their car business right now. So if you're going to

0:20:34.880 --> 0:20:38.240
<v Speaker 1>tell investors that EVS and a vis uh, you know,

0:20:38.280 --> 0:20:40.720
<v Speaker 1>that's industry parents for Autno vehicles are going to cost

0:20:40.720 --> 0:20:42.199
<v Speaker 1>you a lot of money. Hit the bottom line, you

0:20:42.280 --> 0:20:44.680
<v Speaker 1>might as well do it. When the markets are wusy

0:20:44.680 --> 0:20:46.800
<v Speaker 1>in the big places where you've been seeing some growth,

0:20:47.240 --> 0:20:49.399
<v Speaker 1>kind of kitchen sink everything at once. Take the hit

0:20:49.480 --> 0:20:51.480
<v Speaker 1>on your share price, take the head on your profits.

0:20:52.400 --> 0:20:55.920
<v Speaker 1>Start leaning up. And then when things start to grow again,

0:20:56.200 --> 0:20:58.359
<v Speaker 1>when the cycle turns back up, and you can start

0:20:58.400 --> 0:21:00.920
<v Speaker 1>boasting about how your evs are on great and they're

0:21:00.960 --> 0:21:03.960
<v Speaker 1>breaking even, are making money, and maybe you'll get some enthusiasm.

0:21:04.000 --> 0:21:06.120
<v Speaker 1>But I get the sense of the car companies, they're

0:21:06.160 --> 0:21:08.879
<v Speaker 1>just clouds all around them. The business isn't bad everyone.

0:21:09.080 --> 0:21:12.000
<v Speaker 1>This isn't crazis time in terms of companies threatened with

0:21:12.040 --> 0:21:14.800
<v Speaker 1>bankruptcy like we saw a decade ago. But it is

0:21:15.240 --> 0:21:18.760
<v Speaker 1>crass time for investor interests. But it that way, and

0:21:18.760 --> 0:21:20.159
<v Speaker 1>I think you're going to see the stacks take a

0:21:20.240 --> 0:21:22.680
<v Speaker 1>beating for a while. David Welch, thank you so much

0:21:22.720 --> 0:21:24.840
<v Speaker 1>for being with us. David Welch, Detroit bureau chief for

0:21:25.119 --> 0:21:40.480
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg News, coming to us from Detroit. Well, I think

0:21:40.480 --> 0:21:44.400
<v Speaker 1>both employers and employees agree that healthcare costs the inflation

0:21:44.400 --> 0:21:47.359
<v Speaker 1>of healthcare costs is getting very much a challenge for

0:21:47.480 --> 0:21:51.280
<v Speaker 1>both parties. Recently, there's Senate hearings on drug pricing where

0:21:51.280 --> 0:21:55.239
<v Speaker 1>senators challenged top executives of seven pharmaceutical companies on the

0:21:55.280 --> 0:21:58.840
<v Speaker 1>spiraling costs of prescription drugs. To help us look at

0:21:58.920 --> 0:22:01.960
<v Speaker 1>this complicated issue, we welcome Michael Ray. Michael's a founder

0:22:02.000 --> 0:22:05.000
<v Speaker 1>and CEO of r X Saving Solutions based on overal

0:22:05.040 --> 0:22:07.959
<v Speaker 1>in Park, Kansas. Michael joins us in our Bloomberg interact,

0:22:07.960 --> 0:22:11.840
<v Speaker 1>the Broker's Studio. Michael, welcome. You know, everyone agrees here

0:22:11.880 --> 0:22:15.240
<v Speaker 1>that drug prices are too high. The inflation associated with

0:22:15.320 --> 0:22:19.480
<v Speaker 1>bruck drug prices and drug therapies are you know, very

0:22:19.560 --> 0:22:22.440
<v Speaker 1>much of an issue for both employers and employees. Is

0:22:22.480 --> 0:22:24.440
<v Speaker 1>there what is the best way or is there any

0:22:24.440 --> 0:22:27.280
<v Speaker 1>way to kind of manage these costs? Yeah? I think

0:22:27.280 --> 0:22:32.200
<v Speaker 1>that excuse me, a transparent market where information flows freely

0:22:32.240 --> 0:22:34.040
<v Speaker 1>is the best way to manage it. I think that

0:22:34.440 --> 0:22:39.080
<v Speaker 1>when consumers have access to information about pricing and therapy options,

0:22:39.119 --> 0:22:41.880
<v Speaker 1>they can make decisions that are in both their best

0:22:41.920 --> 0:22:44.760
<v Speaker 1>financial interest and also that of the health planner employer

0:22:44.840 --> 0:22:47.040
<v Speaker 1>that ends up paying a lot of that cost of

0:22:47.040 --> 0:22:49.920
<v Speaker 1>the drug. So Michael It's interesting because we are heading

0:22:49.920 --> 0:22:54.760
<v Speaker 1>towards the election season. Joe Biden is expected to announce

0:22:54.880 --> 0:22:57.800
<v Speaker 1>his his his throwing his hat into the ring to

0:22:57.880 --> 0:23:02.040
<v Speaker 1>become a candidate for the Democratic Party. I'm surprised we

0:23:02.080 --> 0:23:06.560
<v Speaker 1>haven't heard more about reducing drug prices, are you? Um?

0:23:06.600 --> 0:23:09.760
<v Speaker 1>I think that what has become evident is this is

0:23:09.800 --> 0:23:13.720
<v Speaker 1>a difficult subject um and topic to really address and

0:23:13.800 --> 0:23:16.919
<v Speaker 1>actually bring about meaningful change. Everyone agrees with the idea

0:23:17.040 --> 0:23:19.679
<v Speaker 1>that you know, both bipartisan support that we want to

0:23:19.840 --> 0:23:23.399
<v Speaker 1>lower drug prices, but how to actually do that has

0:23:23.400 --> 0:23:26.280
<v Speaker 1>stymied most efforts to do so thus far. It's, in

0:23:26.320 --> 0:23:28.680
<v Speaker 1>other words, because it's complicated, and because it's not a

0:23:28.760 --> 0:23:32.440
<v Speaker 1>very sexy topic. UH candidates are not going to necessarily

0:23:32.480 --> 0:23:35.399
<v Speaker 1>make that a a sort of campaign issue in the

0:23:35.400 --> 0:23:38.520
<v Speaker 1>way that perhaps otherwise they would. Is that well, I

0:23:38.520 --> 0:23:40.520
<v Speaker 1>think I think it is a sexy topic that most

0:23:40.560 --> 0:23:43.239
<v Speaker 1>people can identify with, and so, uh, you know you're

0:23:43.280 --> 0:23:46.680
<v Speaker 1>gonna see UH candidates talk about it more and more. UM.

0:23:46.720 --> 0:23:48.240
<v Speaker 1>I think it hasn't probably been as much of a

0:23:48.240 --> 0:23:51.800
<v Speaker 1>focal point recently, just given the lack of progress that's

0:23:51.800 --> 0:23:53.760
<v Speaker 1>been made in the bills that have kind of come

0:23:53.800 --> 0:23:56.879
<v Speaker 1>before the Senate and the House. UH, and you know

0:23:57.000 --> 0:24:00.800
<v Speaker 1>thus far, but it's it's it's clear that big pharma,

0:24:00.960 --> 0:24:04.200
<v Speaker 1>there's really very little leverage that can be placed upon

0:24:04.280 --> 0:24:08.360
<v Speaker 1>big farmer to literally cut drug prices. Is that correct? Yeah,

0:24:08.359 --> 0:24:10.080
<v Speaker 1>it's a free, open market. They can set the list

0:24:10.080 --> 0:24:12.920
<v Speaker 1>prices for the drugs they own. But if I'm a

0:24:13.000 --> 0:24:15.439
<v Speaker 1>large corporation, let's let's if I'm a small to mid

0:24:15.520 --> 0:24:18.080
<v Speaker 1>sized business, what are some of the ways that I

0:24:18.119 --> 0:24:22.879
<v Speaker 1>can manage my healthcare costs and my employees for the

0:24:22.920 --> 0:24:26.520
<v Speaker 1>benefit of my employees. Um, there's a few ways. And

0:24:26.520 --> 0:24:29.720
<v Speaker 1>and most employ a pharmacy benefit manager that that brings

0:24:29.720 --> 0:24:33.280
<v Speaker 1>about negotiation tactics to UH, to the market, tries to

0:24:33.320 --> 0:24:36.119
<v Speaker 1>set up formularies that you know, get rid of the

0:24:36.119 --> 0:24:40.640
<v Speaker 1>expensive drugs and advantage the less expensive drugs. UM. Ultimately, though,

0:24:40.640 --> 0:24:42.919
<v Speaker 1>that information does not get to consumers the way it

0:24:42.960 --> 0:24:45.560
<v Speaker 1>needs to write. So you go into the doctor, they

0:24:45.600 --> 0:24:48.080
<v Speaker 1>prescribe a medication, you take to the pharmacy and fill it.

0:24:48.440 --> 0:24:51.040
<v Speaker 1>What if there was drug B that was ten dollars

0:24:51.040 --> 0:24:54.320
<v Speaker 1>instead of a hundred. That information gets lost and so

0:24:54.520 --> 0:24:57.359
<v Speaker 1>there's this missing component that that is not translated to

0:24:57.400 --> 0:25:00.679
<v Speaker 1>the consumer. That needs to be. So, Michael, what is

0:25:00.880 --> 0:25:03.840
<v Speaker 1>the bill that you think is most promising, either currently

0:25:04.280 --> 0:25:07.439
<v Speaker 1>going through Congress or that you've heard some candidates or

0:25:07.480 --> 0:25:12.160
<v Speaker 1>current lawmakers discuss. I would say elimination of the rebates. Um,

0:25:12.200 --> 0:25:18.840
<v Speaker 1>it's the most basic. It's easy for most parties to understand. Um.

0:25:18.920 --> 0:25:21.600
<v Speaker 1>You know, I think there's bipartisans support for it, but

0:25:21.880 --> 0:25:24.720
<v Speaker 1>the specifics of how it's crafted will make all the

0:25:24.760 --> 0:25:26.920
<v Speaker 1>difference in whether or not it's effective and lowering costs.

0:25:27.000 --> 0:25:29.399
<v Speaker 1>Can you please just remind us what the rebates are

0:25:29.440 --> 0:25:33.919
<v Speaker 1>and who would lose out if if they did remove

0:25:34.000 --> 0:25:37.280
<v Speaker 1>these rebates? Yeah. So rebates are money flowing from a farmer,

0:25:37.359 --> 0:25:41.639
<v Speaker 1>manufacturer to a third party entity. It could be a PBM,

0:25:41.640 --> 0:25:45.320
<v Speaker 1>a health plan, a wholesaler, or an employer. Who who

0:25:45.400 --> 0:25:48.199
<v Speaker 1>are the winners and losers is the question? And I

0:25:48.240 --> 0:25:52.320
<v Speaker 1>think you'll see fights to keep them in place, most

0:25:52.359 --> 0:25:55.400
<v Speaker 1>pronounced by the folks that are probably gonna lose lose debate,

0:25:55.520 --> 0:26:03.280
<v Speaker 1>which is the third party intermediaries such as uh uh,

0:26:03.320 --> 0:26:06.760
<v Speaker 1>probably the PBMs and wholesalers. He doesn't want to say

0:26:07.080 --> 0:26:10.280
<v Speaker 1>he's been a portfolio manentural So I mean, so, Michael,

0:26:10.320 --> 0:26:13.320
<v Speaker 1>what is the sense of timing and that we can

0:26:13.359 --> 0:26:16.040
<v Speaker 1>get anything meaningfully done here or the Congress can get

0:26:16.040 --> 0:26:18.720
<v Speaker 1>anything meaningfully done here on on pricing. Is there is

0:26:18.720 --> 0:26:21.239
<v Speaker 1>there enough bipartisan support to get something done in the

0:26:21.240 --> 0:26:24.400
<v Speaker 1>next I don't know, twelve months. I don't think it's realistic. Yeah.

0:26:24.400 --> 0:26:27.000
<v Speaker 1>I would love to tell you something different, and I

0:26:27.040 --> 0:26:29.000
<v Speaker 1>would support if they did do it, but I don't

0:26:29.040 --> 0:26:31.960
<v Speaker 1>think it's realistic. What about on the corporate side, in

0:26:31.960 --> 0:26:34.320
<v Speaker 1>the private sector, we did hear a little bit about

0:26:34.400 --> 0:26:37.679
<v Speaker 1>JP Morgan and Berkshire Hathway teaming up to create some

0:26:37.760 --> 0:26:40.720
<v Speaker 1>sort of in house healthcare plan to try to lower

0:26:40.800 --> 0:26:44.280
<v Speaker 1>DRUB prices and negotiate directly. Has there been any movement

0:26:44.400 --> 0:26:47.000
<v Speaker 1>on that front? Maybe not even with necessarily JPMorgan and

0:26:47.040 --> 0:26:49.960
<v Speaker 1>Berkekshire Hathway, but any other corporations that have really done

0:26:49.960 --> 0:26:53.359
<v Speaker 1>a good job at this well. Um, there's a number

0:26:53.400 --> 0:26:56.320
<v Speaker 1>of groups that have formed to try to address this issue, um,

0:26:56.600 --> 0:26:59.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, in a kind of coop type way. I

0:26:59.520 --> 0:27:02.720
<v Speaker 1>think some groups like the Health Transformation Alliance are probably

0:27:02.760 --> 0:27:06.640
<v Speaker 1>further ahead, um, you know, in in kind of grouping

0:27:06.680 --> 0:27:11.720
<v Speaker 1>companies together to try to create buying power. Um. Yeah,

0:27:12.000 --> 0:27:16.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean how much is that actually effectively lowering prices

0:27:16.880 --> 0:27:19.280
<v Speaker 1>in other words, is that actually like a competitive aspect

0:27:19.359 --> 0:27:23.679
<v Speaker 1>in markets? Now? Uh, these these teamed up corporations. I

0:27:23.680 --> 0:27:26.479
<v Speaker 1>think it depends on how how it's positioned and how

0:27:26.560 --> 0:27:28.760
<v Speaker 1>much it's utilized. So when you look at a medical cost,

0:27:28.800 --> 0:27:31.200
<v Speaker 1>you've got a unit economic and you're trying to get

0:27:31.240 --> 0:27:34.159
<v Speaker 1>a discount. With drugs, we're actually saying there might be

0:27:34.200 --> 0:27:36.760
<v Speaker 1>a different clinical therapy that is not two or three

0:27:36.840 --> 0:27:41.359
<v Speaker 1>percent cheaper, it's you know, thirty forty cheaper um. And

0:27:41.400 --> 0:27:43.959
<v Speaker 1>so that's where the power lies with drugs as compared

0:27:44.000 --> 0:27:47.760
<v Speaker 1>to medical and hospitals. So, Michael, this seems the healthcare

0:27:47.760 --> 0:27:50.000
<v Speaker 1>industry in general, it certainly the pharmaceutical part of it

0:27:50.040 --> 0:27:53.919
<v Speaker 1>seems like it is ripe for disruption. Where from a

0:27:53.960 --> 0:27:57.639
<v Speaker 1>technological perspective, I'm why has this Silicon Valley come in

0:27:57.640 --> 0:28:00.159
<v Speaker 1>here and looked at this big issue and done and

0:28:00.320 --> 0:28:03.160
<v Speaker 1>Amazon dot com whatever meant when Amazon did through retail

0:28:03.240 --> 0:28:05.800
<v Speaker 1>and consumer has there ever been is that you think

0:28:05.840 --> 0:28:08.160
<v Speaker 1>that's a focus of Silicon Valley. This seems like such

0:28:08.200 --> 0:28:11.200
<v Speaker 1>a huge mess that is right for a technological solution. Yeah,

0:28:11.200 --> 0:28:13.000
<v Speaker 1>I think it is. And and you know we hear

0:28:13.040 --> 0:28:16.119
<v Speaker 1>from them often from the folks the equity backers in

0:28:16.160 --> 0:28:17.960
<v Speaker 1>that area. There have been a number of companies that

0:28:17.960 --> 0:28:20.439
<v Speaker 1>have come and gone with the promise that they can

0:28:20.480 --> 0:28:23.080
<v Speaker 1>address this issue. I think what has occurred is most

0:28:23.119 --> 0:28:26.360
<v Speaker 1>have flamed out because this is such a complex space. Um.

0:28:26.359 --> 0:28:28.600
<v Speaker 1>When I look at what you know we do today,

0:28:28.680 --> 0:28:30.439
<v Speaker 1>I mean we service five million people as we have

0:28:30.520 --> 0:28:33.800
<v Speaker 1>market proof, not just a power point, and that piece

0:28:34.080 --> 0:28:36.960
<v Speaker 1>will become more and more important for anybody who's trying

0:28:37.000 --> 0:28:38.560
<v Speaker 1>to solve it. You gotta you gotta not just say it,

0:28:38.600 --> 0:28:41.400
<v Speaker 1>you gotta do it. You gotta do it, which has

0:28:41.400 --> 0:28:44.200
<v Speaker 1>definitely been challenging when it comes to tackling drug prices

0:28:44.200 --> 0:28:46.520
<v Speaker 1>in the in certainly in the United States. Michael Ry,

0:28:46.520 --> 0:28:48.520
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for being with us here in

0:28:48.520 --> 0:28:51.280
<v Speaker 1>our Bloomberg Interactive Broker Studios. Michael Ray, founder and chief

0:28:51.280 --> 0:28:57.200
<v Speaker 1>executive officer of our ex Saving Solutions based in Overland Park, Kansas.

0:28:57.880 --> 0:29:00.479
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg pl podcast. You can

0:29:00.520 --> 0:29:03.320
<v Speaker 1>subscribe and listen to interviews at Apple Podcasts or whatever

0:29:03.360 --> 0:29:06.320
<v Speaker 1>podcast platform you prefer. I'm Paul Sweeney, I'm on Twitter

0:29:06.440 --> 0:29:09.040
<v Speaker 1>at pt Sweeney. I'm Lisa abram Woyit's I'm on Twitter

0:29:09.120 --> 0:29:11.760
<v Speaker 1>at Lisa Abram woits one before the podcast, you can

0:29:11.800 --> 0:29:14.200
<v Speaker 1>always catch us worldwide on Bloomberg Radio