WEBVTT - 080523 A Talk with Conservative Pundit Ami Horowitz (Part 1)

0:00:00.520 --> 0:00:04.480
<v Speaker 1>Broadcasting from the Hip Hop Weekly Studios. You are now

0:00:04.519 --> 0:00:06.880
<v Speaker 1>tuned into another episode of Civic Cipher. I'm your host,

0:00:07.000 --> 0:00:07.680
<v Speaker 1>Ramsey's job.

0:00:07.760 --> 0:00:10.600
<v Speaker 2>He is Ramsey's job. I am q Woard And you

0:00:10.800 --> 0:00:15.920
<v Speaker 2>are absolutely tuned in for another segment of City Psyche.

0:00:15.960 --> 0:00:18.080
<v Speaker 3>Indeed, you are so stick around. We got a lot

0:00:18.120 --> 0:00:21.200
<v Speaker 3>in store for you today. We've got a special guest.

0:00:21.160 --> 0:00:24.400
<v Speaker 1>Who's going to be having a couple of interesting conversations

0:00:24.440 --> 0:00:26.480
<v Speaker 1>with us. He goes by the name of Ammy Horowitz,

0:00:26.800 --> 0:00:31.360
<v Speaker 1>who is an American conservative documentary filmmaker and activist. He

0:00:31.440 --> 0:00:34.600
<v Speaker 1>is the writer, producer, and director of Amy on Mlouse,

0:00:34.880 --> 0:00:37.760
<v Speaker 1>a satirical short film series made for Fox News. And

0:00:37.800 --> 0:00:40.600
<v Speaker 1>I know what you're thinking, what is going on, But

0:00:41.400 --> 0:00:44.640
<v Speaker 1>the point of today's show is to start having some

0:00:44.720 --> 0:00:49.559
<v Speaker 1>constructive conversations across the political aisle. And I do believe

0:00:49.680 --> 0:00:52.680
<v Speaker 1>that Amy is the sort of person with the right

0:00:52.680 --> 0:00:55.760
<v Speaker 1>temperament to begin having these conversations for.

0:00:55.920 --> 0:00:57.320
<v Speaker 3>Us, because this is very new to us.

0:00:57.320 --> 0:00:58.639
<v Speaker 1>Another thing that we're going to do a little later

0:00:58.680 --> 0:01:01.320
<v Speaker 1>on in the show is how a very similar conversation

0:01:01.440 --> 0:01:07.080
<v Speaker 1>with our special guest across the ethnic aisle, if you will.

0:01:08.280 --> 0:01:10.280
<v Speaker 1>For those who have been paying attention to the news.

0:01:10.280 --> 0:01:13.880
<v Speaker 1>Over the past let's call it year plus, there has

0:01:13.920 --> 0:01:18.200
<v Speaker 1>been a little bit of friction between Black people and

0:01:18.280 --> 0:01:23.000
<v Speaker 1>Jewish people, often stemming from black people's side of the equation,

0:01:23.280 --> 0:01:26.000
<v Speaker 1>and we felt the conversation would be in order to

0:01:26.440 --> 0:01:30.720
<v Speaker 1>attempt to establish a degree of understanding and really communication.

0:01:30.800 --> 0:01:33.720
<v Speaker 1>We definitely believe in communication on the show here, and

0:01:34.280 --> 0:01:38.120
<v Speaker 1>Ami has been kind enough to grant us an audience,

0:01:39.240 --> 0:01:41.280
<v Speaker 1>so a person who obviously sees the world a little

0:01:41.280 --> 0:01:44.240
<v Speaker 1>differently than we do. But we're hoping that this conversations

0:01:44.560 --> 0:01:50.040
<v Speaker 1>that we have today will be informative, constructive, and hopefully

0:01:50.160 --> 0:01:55.480
<v Speaker 1>lead to increased dialogue across several aisles. And again, this

0:01:55.560 --> 0:01:58.000
<v Speaker 1>is kind of what we're hoping for today. But first

0:01:58.040 --> 0:02:00.280
<v Speaker 1>and foremost, we are going to start to sh off

0:02:00.280 --> 0:02:02.960
<v Speaker 1>as we always do with some ebony excellence, shall we

0:02:02.960 --> 0:02:06.280
<v Speaker 1>we shall? So today's ABNY Excellence is sponsored by Hip

0:02:06.280 --> 0:02:11.320
<v Speaker 1>Hop Weekly Media and we are reading from the Black

0:02:11.360 --> 0:02:17.120
<v Speaker 1>Information Network. Today's ABNY Excellence is an acknowledgment of black

0:02:17.200 --> 0:02:22.200
<v Speaker 1>CEO's reaching a record breaking high on the Fortune five

0:02:22.280 --> 0:02:22.880
<v Speaker 1>hundred list.

0:02:23.000 --> 0:02:24.480
<v Speaker 3>We thought that was very special.

0:02:24.120 --> 0:02:27.920
<v Speaker 1>So allow me to read eight black CEOs lead companies

0:02:28.000 --> 0:02:30.400
<v Speaker 1>that have landed on the twenty twenty three Fortune five

0:02:30.480 --> 0:02:34.080
<v Speaker 1>hundred list, the most since the ranking's debut in nineteen

0:02:34.200 --> 0:02:37.200
<v Speaker 1>fifty five. Per the company's website, two of the eight

0:02:37.200 --> 0:02:39.720
<v Speaker 1>black executives joined the Fortune five hundred list for the

0:02:39.720 --> 0:02:42.800
<v Speaker 1>first time ever. Calvin Butler Junior jumped up the ranks

0:02:42.800 --> 0:02:45.400
<v Speaker 1>in December twenty twenty two as the CEO of energy

0:02:45.840 --> 0:02:49.480
<v Speaker 1>provider Excellent, which landed at number two hundred and eighteen

0:02:49.520 --> 0:02:53.360
<v Speaker 1>on the list. Christopher Womack, the CEO of Southern Company

0:02:53.680 --> 0:02:56.160
<v Speaker 1>in Atlanta based gas and utility company, was also in

0:02:56.240 --> 0:02:58.360
<v Speaker 1>your infant to the group of black CEOs after earning

0:02:58.360 --> 0:02:59.520
<v Speaker 1>the top position in May.

0:03:00.040 --> 0:03:01.840
<v Speaker 3>A third back. A third black.

0:03:01.639 --> 0:03:04.760
<v Speaker 1>Executive, Renade Jones of New York, New York's M and

0:03:04.800 --> 0:03:06.600
<v Speaker 1>T Bank, returned to the ranking after the bank was

0:03:06.680 --> 0:03:09.840
<v Speaker 1>dropped off from last year's list due to a decrease

0:03:09.919 --> 0:03:12.720
<v Speaker 1>in revenue through the rank.

0:03:12.960 --> 0:03:13.240
<v Speaker 3>Sorry.

0:03:13.280 --> 0:03:16.079
<v Speaker 1>Though the ranking holds a record number of black executives,

0:03:16.240 --> 0:03:18.160
<v Speaker 1>they still only make up less than two percent of

0:03:18.200 --> 0:03:22.400
<v Speaker 1>all Fortune five hundred CEOs. Black CEOs faced higher expectations

0:03:22.400 --> 0:03:25.760
<v Speaker 1>to pursue that to prove their qualifications despite being more

0:03:25.880 --> 0:03:28.280
<v Speaker 1>educated than the white counterparts. According to a twenty twenty

0:03:28.360 --> 0:03:32.560
<v Speaker 1>two study published in the Strategic Management Journal. Quote, there

0:03:32.560 --> 0:03:35.880
<v Speaker 1>are a plethora of talented, qualified, extraordinary leaders who happen

0:03:35.880 --> 0:03:38.520
<v Speaker 1>to be black. It's never a surprise when they advanced

0:03:38.560 --> 0:03:41.560
<v Speaker 1>to the c suite or even to the CEO position, quote,

0:03:41.800 --> 0:03:47.080
<v Speaker 1>said Laura Morgan Roberts, an associate professor of Business administration

0:03:47.120 --> 0:03:50.080
<v Speaker 1>at the University of Virginia's Darden School of Business. She

0:03:50.160 --> 0:03:52.800
<v Speaker 1>goes on to say, it says more about the companies

0:03:53.080 --> 0:03:55.760
<v Speaker 1>and the board of director's ability to develop an advance

0:03:55.840 --> 0:03:58.840
<v Speaker 1>talent from all backgrounds than it says about the representation

0:03:59.000 --> 0:04:01.800
<v Speaker 1>of the leaders themselves. So we want to shout out

0:04:02.840 --> 0:04:09.840
<v Speaker 1>any advancement, certainly in the corporate world that we feel

0:04:10.120 --> 0:04:12.680
<v Speaker 1>is a step in the right direction, and so shout

0:04:12.680 --> 0:04:16.520
<v Speaker 1>out to the CEOs who landed on the Fortune five

0:04:16.600 --> 0:04:20.600
<v Speaker 1>hundred list that are black. Moving on, it is time

0:04:20.680 --> 0:04:24.200
<v Speaker 1>to talk to our special guests. So Ami, welcome to

0:04:24.240 --> 0:04:27.480
<v Speaker 1>the show, of course, and for our listeners benefit, we

0:04:27.520 --> 0:04:29.400
<v Speaker 1>gave you a brief introduction, but talk a little bit

0:04:29.440 --> 0:04:31.120
<v Speaker 1>about yourself and what it is that you do and

0:04:31.160 --> 0:04:33.120
<v Speaker 1>how people might be familiar with your work.

0:04:34.080 --> 0:04:35.800
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, it's funny. I think you read it you wrote

0:04:35.839 --> 0:04:39.680
<v Speaker 4>off my Wikipedia page, which is not entirely accurate.

0:04:39.960 --> 0:04:41.559
<v Speaker 3>Okay, we'll educate us.

0:04:41.839 --> 0:04:45.280
<v Speaker 4>So, yeah, you know, look, people call me conservative filmmaker.

0:04:45.320 --> 0:04:48.360
<v Speaker 4>I'm not sure I would I would qualify myself as that.

0:04:48.480 --> 0:04:50.679
<v Speaker 4>Certainly I'm right of center on most things, but certainly

0:04:50.760 --> 0:04:53.159
<v Speaker 4>go center or left of center on a bunch of

0:04:53.160 --> 0:04:58.080
<v Speaker 4>things as well. Okay, and don't produce my work for

0:04:58.120 --> 0:05:00.920
<v Speaker 4>Fox News. I've been on Fox News, but some reason

0:05:01.040 --> 0:05:06.440
<v Speaker 4>that's on my Wikipedia page. My background actually was as

0:05:07.040 --> 0:05:11.400
<v Speaker 4>an investment banker. I did that for about well. My

0:05:11.520 --> 0:05:13.760
<v Speaker 4>career has kind of been doing things I had no

0:05:13.920 --> 0:05:18.120
<v Speaker 4>business doing. So my first job was I actually ran

0:05:18.520 --> 0:05:22.360
<v Speaker 4>out of college. I ran a campaign for State Controller

0:05:22.400 --> 0:05:25.880
<v Speaker 4>of Maryland. I had zero experience in running a campaign,

0:05:26.200 --> 0:05:28.360
<v Speaker 4>but for some reason I kind of fell into the job.

0:05:28.760 --> 0:05:30.520
<v Speaker 3>This was a Democratic candidate, right.

0:05:30.800 --> 0:05:34.600
<v Speaker 4>A Democratic candidate. All right, Look again, it's not about

0:05:34.600 --> 0:05:37.120
<v Speaker 4>the letter. It's more about what people think for me

0:05:37.240 --> 0:05:39.279
<v Speaker 4>and kind of what their perspective is, and do I

0:05:39.320 --> 0:05:42.200
<v Speaker 4>align myself with that. This guy was kind of run

0:05:42.279 --> 0:05:45.040
<v Speaker 4>up my alley on ninety eight percent of all the issues,

0:05:45.080 --> 0:05:46.840
<v Speaker 4>and I thought, this is a guy who I think

0:05:46.880 --> 0:05:52.400
<v Speaker 4>should be elected to this position, and afterwards I was

0:05:52.440 --> 0:05:54.359
<v Speaker 4>trying to figure out what I want to do next.

0:05:54.760 --> 0:05:56.960
<v Speaker 4>He said, well, why don't you go make some money

0:05:56.960 --> 0:05:59.679
<v Speaker 4>first and then come back into politics. And I go, great,

0:05:59.720 --> 0:06:03.200
<v Speaker 4>how do you make money? He goes be an investment

0:06:03.360 --> 0:06:06.080
<v Speaker 4>banker like me, and I was like, I don't even

0:06:06.120 --> 0:06:08.400
<v Speaker 4>know what that is. Never took a business course in

0:06:08.440 --> 0:06:11.599
<v Speaker 4>my life. And I basically moved to New York without

0:06:11.600 --> 0:06:15.880
<v Speaker 4>knowing anybody. And I mean, this is back when when

0:06:15.920 --> 0:06:18.160
<v Speaker 4>payphones were around. You guys may not know what that is.

0:06:18.320 --> 0:06:21.760
<v Speaker 4>Oh things out there that you just put you plugged

0:06:21.760 --> 0:06:25.200
<v Speaker 4>in quarters and you could make phone calls. And got

0:06:25.200 --> 0:06:27.000
<v Speaker 4>the Wall Street Journal and got a list of the

0:06:27.040 --> 0:06:30.080
<v Speaker 4>investment banks and cold called investment banks until I and

0:06:30.360 --> 0:06:32.599
<v Speaker 4>I'm going on too long, stop me, please no, please

0:06:33.279 --> 0:06:37.800
<v Speaker 4>go ahead, And somehow got interviews and just kind of

0:06:38.400 --> 0:06:41.760
<v Speaker 4>my way into my first entry level job and did

0:06:41.839 --> 0:06:46.840
<v Speaker 4>that for about ten years. Wasn't never particularly good at it,

0:06:46.920 --> 0:06:49.120
<v Speaker 4>but just was able to kind of get along, just

0:06:49.160 --> 0:06:52.000
<v Speaker 4>move on. And then finally I decided, out of nowhere

0:06:52.000 --> 0:06:55.320
<v Speaker 4>to make a movie again. Zero film experience, no idea

0:06:55.360 --> 0:06:57.280
<v Speaker 4>what I was doing, but kind of fell had a

0:06:57.360 --> 0:07:01.040
<v Speaker 4>knack for it. Made a my my first feature film

0:07:01.160 --> 0:07:04.919
<v Speaker 4>or my only feature film about the the United Nations,

0:07:05.240 --> 0:07:09.000
<v Speaker 4>kind of like a black satirical Michael Moore style documentary

0:07:09.160 --> 0:07:13.120
<v Speaker 4>about the dangers and the failures of the UN and

0:07:13.160 --> 0:07:14.720
<v Speaker 4>then never look back. This has kind of been my

0:07:14.800 --> 0:07:15.480
<v Speaker 4>career since then.

0:07:15.720 --> 0:07:17.120
<v Speaker 3>Sure, sure, sure. Now.

0:07:17.680 --> 0:07:20.920
<v Speaker 1>One of the things that I think that some people

0:07:21.000 --> 0:07:22.840
<v Speaker 1>might know you for is is kind of that sort

0:07:22.840 --> 0:07:26.800
<v Speaker 1>of satirical sort of like Man on the Street, just

0:07:26.880 --> 0:07:31.400
<v Speaker 1>kind of getting interviews from people that is in the

0:07:31.440 --> 0:07:35.120
<v Speaker 1>same vein of what our listeners might be familiar with

0:07:36.160 --> 0:07:38.640
<v Speaker 1>from the likes of like The Daily Show with people

0:07:38.680 --> 0:07:41.680
<v Speaker 1>like Jordan Klepper or Roy Wood Junior, just people just

0:07:41.760 --> 0:07:44.680
<v Speaker 1>kind of getting out there. But you know, my understanding

0:07:44.720 --> 0:07:52.040
<v Speaker 1>is that you've done these about topics that are well,

0:07:52.080 --> 0:07:53.800
<v Speaker 1>you know what, why don't why don't I let you

0:07:54.040 --> 0:07:56.360
<v Speaker 1>describe it a little bit more so, so talk to

0:07:56.480 --> 0:07:59.000
<v Speaker 1>us about that facet of your career.

0:08:00.120 --> 0:08:04.920
<v Speaker 4>Yeah. So I kind of do several types of videos.

0:08:05.280 --> 0:08:09.120
<v Speaker 4>Some are short documentaries where I'll go to Venezuela or

0:08:09.160 --> 0:08:13.440
<v Speaker 4>I'll go to the Janine and I will you know,

0:08:13.600 --> 0:08:17.800
<v Speaker 4>uncover or or kind of dig into a particular issue

0:08:17.800 --> 0:08:19.880
<v Speaker 4>which I find interesting or I think that needs to

0:08:19.920 --> 0:08:24.160
<v Speaker 4>be explained or exposed. And then another set of a

0:08:24.240 --> 0:08:27.640
<v Speaker 4>video I do are kind of like stunt type videos

0:08:28.000 --> 0:08:31.920
<v Speaker 4>where all you know, I'll wave, I'll have hidden cameras

0:08:32.360 --> 0:08:35.480
<v Speaker 4>and I'll wave, give an ISIS flag on the Berkeley

0:08:35.520 --> 0:08:38.440
<v Speaker 4>campus and see what people's reactions are to it. The

0:08:38.480 --> 0:08:41.280
<v Speaker 4>next day I fly the US flag and see what

0:08:41.320 --> 0:08:44.480
<v Speaker 4>people and compare contrasts and different reactions. And then the

0:08:44.480 --> 0:08:46.440
<v Speaker 4>third type one you're referring to, a kind of man

0:08:46.520 --> 0:08:50.600
<v Speaker 4>the street where I interview people around the world and

0:08:50.920 --> 0:08:53.520
<v Speaker 4>try to get to the heart of kind of what

0:08:53.600 --> 0:08:56.760
<v Speaker 4>they're thinking is and and get a sense of really

0:08:56.760 --> 0:08:59.319
<v Speaker 4>what their and it's usually not me arguing with them.

0:08:59.320 --> 0:09:02.079
<v Speaker 4>It's very rare I do. Yeah, it's more really trying

0:09:02.120 --> 0:09:06.280
<v Speaker 4>to understand what they think and having them say the

0:09:06.400 --> 0:09:08.560
<v Speaker 4>quiet part out loud. That's kind of like my real

0:09:08.640 --> 0:09:12.800
<v Speaker 4>skill set. Oftentimes I will pretend to be a person

0:09:12.840 --> 0:09:14.719
<v Speaker 4>that thinks similar to them, which makes them feel a

0:09:14.720 --> 0:09:16.960
<v Speaker 4>little more comfortable. That's kind of where there might be

0:09:17.000 --> 0:09:19.600
<v Speaker 4>some controversy. I'm not I don't really understand the controversy.

0:09:19.600 --> 0:09:22.040
<v Speaker 4>People will say, well, you know you're leading the horse

0:09:22.080 --> 0:09:24.400
<v Speaker 4>to water. I go, well, that may be true, but

0:09:24.440 --> 0:09:26.360
<v Speaker 4>you can never force the horse to drink the water.

0:09:26.440 --> 0:09:28.800
<v Speaker 4>Either they drink it, they don't drink it. You could

0:09:28.880 --> 0:09:30.920
<v Speaker 4>lead me down any path you want, but I'm not

0:09:30.960 --> 0:09:33.480
<v Speaker 4>going to say something I don't believe. So that's kind

0:09:33.480 --> 0:09:35.680
<v Speaker 4>of been my style, kind of having them feel comfortable

0:09:35.679 --> 0:09:38.240
<v Speaker 4>by me pretending to kind of think like they do.

0:09:38.640 --> 0:09:39.560
<v Speaker 3>Sure so good.

0:09:39.720 --> 0:09:42.680
<v Speaker 2>So for our listeners who might not be familiar running

0:09:42.679 --> 0:09:47.560
<v Speaker 2>a campaign for a state controller into investment banking. For

0:09:47.640 --> 0:09:49.800
<v Speaker 2>people who are not familiar with the role of a controller,

0:09:49.840 --> 0:09:52.840
<v Speaker 2>I'm thinking that's fiscal or in some way a financial

0:09:52.920 --> 0:09:54.480
<v Speaker 2>role for the state. Could you tell people a little

0:09:54.520 --> 0:09:56.839
<v Speaker 2>bit more about what a state controller does, like a.

0:09:56.800 --> 0:09:59.120
<v Speaker 4>Treasurer I think they call that, you know, in some

0:09:59.160 --> 0:10:02.160
<v Speaker 4>states they call it control or something to call it treasurer. Yeah,

0:10:02.400 --> 0:10:04.200
<v Speaker 4>the finance in the statement.

0:10:04.040 --> 0:10:05.720
<v Speaker 2>Okay, I just wanted you to give that little bit

0:10:05.760 --> 0:10:08.559
<v Speaker 2>of context for for listeners who weren't familiar with the

0:10:08.640 --> 0:10:09.280
<v Speaker 2>term controller.

0:10:09.679 --> 0:10:14.400
<v Speaker 1>So one of the things that I found interesting is

0:10:14.440 --> 0:10:22.040
<v Speaker 1>that obviously here we consume a lot of media in

0:10:22.200 --> 0:10:31.680
<v Speaker 1>order to get a well rounded view of events in

0:10:31.720 --> 0:10:38.400
<v Speaker 1>the news cycle, and we found it problematic and and

0:10:38.840 --> 0:10:43.040
<v Speaker 1>difficult to approach a lot of news from conservative sources,

0:10:43.800 --> 0:10:48.800
<v Speaker 1>mostly because we felt this is our perspective, and I'm

0:10:48.840 --> 0:10:51.160
<v Speaker 1>sure that a lot of people share this perspective. If

0:10:51.200 --> 0:10:56.720
<v Speaker 1>you look at the the distribution of the population and

0:10:57.000 --> 0:11:00.560
<v Speaker 1>by by ethnicity of who consumes what media sources, you

0:11:00.640 --> 0:11:03.560
<v Speaker 1>might see a little bit of a trend. But we

0:11:03.600 --> 0:11:08.960
<v Speaker 1>felt that a lot of news sources were anti black

0:11:09.240 --> 0:11:14.680
<v Speaker 1>in some instances, the people that were elevated to you know,

0:11:14.800 --> 0:11:20.520
<v Speaker 1>primetime positions were often the most hateful, the most divisive

0:11:21.360 --> 0:11:24.400
<v Speaker 1>sorts of individuals, and we could see, you know, people

0:11:24.480 --> 0:11:31.000
<v Speaker 1>profiting from allowing this divide to deepen and to protect

0:11:31.360 --> 0:11:34.679
<v Speaker 1>our own sort of mental health and to just recognize

0:11:34.720 --> 0:11:36.920
<v Speaker 1>that we kind of have a longer road here, we've

0:11:37.080 --> 0:11:42.560
<v Speaker 1>limited intake from media outlets that are not entirely based

0:11:42.600 --> 0:11:46.280
<v Speaker 1>In fact, you know, Fox News famously had to pay

0:11:47.320 --> 0:11:52.440
<v Speaker 1>Dominion voting systems almost a billion dollars. Yeah, it was

0:11:52.440 --> 0:11:58.560
<v Speaker 1>like seven hundred plus million dollars for basically elevating what

0:11:58.800 --> 0:12:05.199
<v Speaker 1>ultimately as an unfounded and utter lie about the previous administration.

0:12:05.720 --> 0:12:07.360
<v Speaker 1>And that is not their only sin.

0:12:08.000 --> 0:12:08.440
<v Speaker 3>We have.

0:12:09.360 --> 0:12:13.240
<v Speaker 1>Even objectively, they are very very biased in one direction.

0:12:13.320 --> 0:12:14.840
<v Speaker 1>And that's not to say that the true is not

0:12:15.360 --> 0:12:17.400
<v Speaker 1>or the same as not true of other media outlets,

0:12:18.720 --> 0:12:23.840
<v Speaker 1>but other media outlets, we don't feel their bias has

0:12:24.200 --> 0:12:28.680
<v Speaker 1>as profound or as direct of an implication on the

0:12:28.760 --> 0:12:33.200
<v Speaker 1>day to take lives of the most vulnerable people, at

0:12:33.280 --> 0:12:37.120
<v Speaker 1>least by race. And so the reason I wanted to

0:12:37.240 --> 0:12:40.880
<v Speaker 1>explain that is because where I'm going next is I've

0:12:40.920 --> 0:12:44.960
<v Speaker 1>always felt by watching programs like The Daily Show, where

0:12:44.960 --> 0:12:46.640
<v Speaker 1>they're kind of based in humor, they're a little bit

0:12:46.640 --> 0:12:49.480
<v Speaker 1>more approachable for most of the population, you know, we

0:12:49.559 --> 0:12:50.959
<v Speaker 1>just wouldn't want to have a laugh that we want

0:12:51.000 --> 0:12:55.000
<v Speaker 1>to be informed as well. That they do have people

0:12:55.120 --> 0:12:56.800
<v Speaker 1>like that. Those the sort of man on the street

0:12:56.880 --> 0:12:59.160
<v Speaker 1>sort of people that go out and they, you know,

0:12:59.280 --> 0:13:03.360
<v Speaker 1>like you, they tend to be aligned politically with the

0:13:03.360 --> 0:13:08.760
<v Speaker 1>people they're interviewing, right, and they will ask questions to

0:13:08.880 --> 0:13:12.680
<v Speaker 1>really see why people believe what it is that they believe, right,

0:13:13.160 --> 0:13:16.040
<v Speaker 1>And obviously these people are seldom prepared to have these

0:13:16.440 --> 0:13:19.959
<v Speaker 1>conversations because they were either taught or you know, that's

0:13:20.120 --> 0:13:23.760
<v Speaker 1>just a reflection of their viewpoint, you know what I mean.

0:13:24.480 --> 0:13:26.400
<v Speaker 1>And I think what we end up seeing and what

0:13:26.400 --> 0:13:29.400
<v Speaker 1>we end up laughing at is that often enough these

0:13:29.440 --> 0:13:34.120
<v Speaker 1>people are politically aligned with what they themselves will identify

0:13:34.360 --> 0:13:38.040
<v Speaker 1>as being against their own interests in the moment in

0:13:38.080 --> 0:13:39.640
<v Speaker 1>that interview, right, And so this is why we can

0:13:39.679 --> 0:13:42.319
<v Speaker 1>all sit around and have a laugh. And so when

0:13:42.360 --> 0:13:46.280
<v Speaker 1>I looked at some of your earlier work and saw

0:13:46.400 --> 0:13:49.400
<v Speaker 1>something similar but from the opposite advantage point, I realized,

0:13:49.720 --> 0:13:53.439
<v Speaker 1>you know what, not only is that fear, but that

0:13:53.559 --> 0:13:59.520
<v Speaker 1>might be something that's missing. Because pure gold fears no fire, right,

0:14:00.040 --> 0:14:02.440
<v Speaker 1>wrong is wrong, right is right. And when we're wrong

0:14:02.520 --> 0:14:04.640
<v Speaker 1>on this side, or when we need to, you know,

0:14:04.679 --> 0:14:09.600
<v Speaker 1>strengthen our arguments or whatever the case is, there's programmings

0:14:10.360 --> 0:14:13.359
<v Speaker 1>like the ones that you put together that are necessary

0:14:13.400 --> 0:14:17.880
<v Speaker 1>for us to really ensure that what we're thinking is

0:14:18.000 --> 0:14:22.560
<v Speaker 1>based in a shared reality, and that our beliefs are

0:14:22.600 --> 0:14:25.760
<v Speaker 1>not simply beliefs because we've been given them, but because

0:14:25.800 --> 0:14:27.640
<v Speaker 1>they are indeed a reflection of who we are as

0:14:27.640 --> 0:14:30.680
<v Speaker 1>a people and what we value as a people. Now,

0:14:31.960 --> 0:14:34.600
<v Speaker 1>I know that my listeners would eat me up if

0:14:34.640 --> 0:14:37.840
<v Speaker 1>I didn't mention that there is a difference in power,

0:14:38.800 --> 0:14:42.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, depending on who you're talking to, and power

0:14:42.080 --> 0:14:45.800
<v Speaker 1>in terms of their capacity to influence their immediate here now,

0:14:45.880 --> 0:14:49.240
<v Speaker 1>either by voting or have some sort of fiscal impact

0:14:49.560 --> 0:14:52.720
<v Speaker 1>or effect on their reality by withholding dollars or spending

0:14:52.760 --> 0:14:56.320
<v Speaker 1>elsewhere or whatever. Those are who are the most vulnerable

0:14:56.320 --> 0:15:00.440
<v Speaker 1>in the population typically don't have that same free them

0:15:00.680 --> 0:15:04.360
<v Speaker 1>to change there, here and now the way that, let's

0:15:04.360 --> 0:15:10.800
<v Speaker 1>be honest, our white male, often conservative, heterosexual Christian brothers

0:15:11.080 --> 0:15:14.520
<v Speaker 1>do the value of a vote is less than the

0:15:14.640 --> 0:15:17.360
<v Speaker 1>value of a vote from that specific type of individual,

0:15:17.360 --> 0:15:19.400
<v Speaker 1>et cetera. Forgive me for going on and on, but

0:15:20.000 --> 0:15:25.120
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to kind of get your thoughts on what

0:15:25.160 --> 0:15:28.480
<v Speaker 1>it is that you are trying to accomplish, or at

0:15:28.560 --> 0:15:33.840
<v Speaker 1>least we're trying to accomplish with your programs like Ami

0:15:33.880 --> 0:15:35.960
<v Speaker 1>on the LuSE and Amy on the Street. What what

0:15:36.040 --> 0:15:38.760
<v Speaker 1>did you think would come about as a result of

0:15:38.800 --> 0:15:40.000
<v Speaker 1>those endeavors?

0:15:41.040 --> 0:15:44.840
<v Speaker 4>Yeah? So so people often ask me, so why do

0:15:44.920 --> 0:15:47.000
<v Speaker 4>I do what I do? Right? Who am I trying

0:15:47.040 --> 0:15:47.560
<v Speaker 4>to speak to?

0:15:47.760 --> 0:15:47.880
<v Speaker 1>Who?

0:15:47.960 --> 0:15:49.120
<v Speaker 4>Now am I speaking to? Who am I trying to

0:15:49.120 --> 0:15:49.440
<v Speaker 4>speak to?

0:15:49.600 --> 0:15:49.880
<v Speaker 3>Sure?

0:15:50.320 --> 0:15:52.280
<v Speaker 4>If if you know, one of the things I'm very

0:15:52.320 --> 0:15:57.560
<v Speaker 4>proud of is I built a significant audience who are

0:15:57.760 --> 0:16:01.760
<v Speaker 4>non conservatives about it, pulling every once in a while

0:16:01.800 --> 0:16:03.600
<v Speaker 4>on my basic get a sense of where they are

0:16:03.600 --> 0:16:07.080
<v Speaker 4>politically roughly rather third are non conservatives. I mean they're

0:16:07.320 --> 0:16:10.600
<v Speaker 4>left of center or independent, some left wing, but a

0:16:10.640 --> 0:16:14.240
<v Speaker 4>few of those, but obviously the majority are conservatives. But

0:16:15.360 --> 0:16:17.120
<v Speaker 4>why do I do what I do? Is because I

0:16:18.440 --> 0:16:23.720
<v Speaker 4>feel that the center left and the center right have

0:16:23.960 --> 0:16:26.760
<v Speaker 4>far more in common than the center right has with

0:16:26.800 --> 0:16:28.560
<v Speaker 4>the far right, and the center left has with the

0:16:28.600 --> 0:16:33.280
<v Speaker 4>far left. And it's unfortunate that most people on both

0:16:33.400 --> 0:16:37.240
<v Speaker 4>sides don't realize that. And so my goal personally is

0:16:37.280 --> 0:16:40.280
<v Speaker 4>to try to separate the center left from the hard left.

0:16:40.720 --> 0:16:42.920
<v Speaker 4>I don't think they have a lot in common. I

0:16:42.960 --> 0:16:45.120
<v Speaker 4>think the center left doesn't fully understand that, as the

0:16:45.120 --> 0:16:46.880
<v Speaker 4>center right doesn't fully understand that. They don't. They have

0:16:47.240 --> 0:16:50.000
<v Speaker 4>not that much in common with the hard right, and

0:16:50.640 --> 0:16:53.520
<v Speaker 4>so I'm trying to speak to them. I'm trying to say, look,

0:16:53.680 --> 0:16:57.960
<v Speaker 4>here is what the hard left believes, and I don't

0:16:57.960 --> 0:17:02.360
<v Speaker 4>think this aligns with your worldview. And if you tell them, hey,

0:17:03.400 --> 0:17:08.560
<v Speaker 4>the hard left believes in destruction of capitalism, open borders,

0:17:08.640 --> 0:17:10.920
<v Speaker 4>transiting nine year olds, the centate left will say that's

0:17:10.920 --> 0:17:14.000
<v Speaker 4>not true, that's right wing talking points. No one believes that,

0:17:14.600 --> 0:17:16.639
<v Speaker 4>And my point is no, no, there are people who

0:17:16.720 --> 0:17:19.000
<v Speaker 4>believe that here are those people, and I don't think

0:17:19.000 --> 0:17:23.200
<v Speaker 4>that aligns your viewpoint. That's why I'm always trying to

0:17:23.200 --> 0:17:25.320
<v Speaker 4>speak to and that's why I love to go on

0:17:25.400 --> 0:17:29.360
<v Speaker 4>shows that don't speak to the typical conservative audience, which

0:17:29.400 --> 0:17:32.879
<v Speaker 4>is just to me, he's preaching the choir, which has value, sure,

0:17:33.200 --> 0:17:35.640
<v Speaker 4>but it's not who I'm trying to engage with. It's

0:17:35.640 --> 0:17:38.159
<v Speaker 4>why I do a lot of videos on race. I

0:17:38.359 --> 0:17:40.640
<v Speaker 4>try to speak to the black community whenever I can.

0:17:41.680 --> 0:17:45.840
<v Speaker 4>I think I think black people and the right of

0:17:45.880 --> 0:17:48.520
<v Speaker 4>center have more in common than either side actually thinks

0:17:48.600 --> 0:17:52.720
<v Speaker 4>or nos. So that's an important audience for me. So yeah,

0:17:52.760 --> 0:17:55.720
<v Speaker 4>I'm always trying to speak to a different audience and

0:17:55.880 --> 0:17:59.960
<v Speaker 4>trying very hard not to alienate that audience for my content.

0:18:01.480 --> 0:18:07.399
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, okay, so here are some things, and please, you know,

0:18:07.720 --> 0:18:08.800
<v Speaker 1>correct me if I'm wrong.

0:18:09.080 --> 0:18:11.159
<v Speaker 3>Actually, you know what, before I ask, I want to

0:18:11.240 --> 0:18:11.920
<v Speaker 3>let you know that.

0:18:14.000 --> 0:18:15.160
<v Speaker 1>What I'm going to do is I'm going to read

0:18:15.200 --> 0:18:17.280
<v Speaker 1>some of the titles of some of the specials that

0:18:17.320 --> 0:18:19.720
<v Speaker 1>you've done, give a little bit of background, just really

0:18:19.760 --> 0:18:22.360
<v Speaker 1>briefly and sort of what you learned in doing them.

0:18:22.440 --> 0:18:24.840
<v Speaker 1>But this first one is going to be kind of heavy.

0:18:26.040 --> 0:18:29.639
<v Speaker 1>It's fair to let you know that on this show,

0:18:30.200 --> 0:18:35.359
<v Speaker 1>we remain critical of policing the way that it is

0:18:35.440 --> 0:18:39.280
<v Speaker 1>done in this country. We push back against the narrative

0:18:39.800 --> 0:18:44.320
<v Speaker 1>that police are always the good guys. We recognize that

0:18:44.359 --> 0:18:49.840
<v Speaker 1>we have been subjected to copaganda and that while there

0:18:49.880 --> 0:18:53.840
<v Speaker 1>are I would assume a decent number of good human

0:18:53.960 --> 0:18:57.040
<v Speaker 1>beings who happen to function in the capacity of a

0:18:57.080 --> 0:19:06.200
<v Speaker 1>police officer, that there is a system that incubates bullying behavior.

0:19:07.359 --> 0:19:16.640
<v Speaker 1>It insulates people from consequences of their biases, their hatred

0:19:16.920 --> 0:19:22.200
<v Speaker 1>manifested in the form of violence against black and brown bodies.

0:19:23.400 --> 0:19:28.359
<v Speaker 1>And we believe that our being critical of policing is

0:19:29.280 --> 0:19:33.920
<v Speaker 1>important to get the best version of public safety possible.

0:19:34.400 --> 0:19:36.560
<v Speaker 1>In other words, we just simply do not accept that

0:19:36.600 --> 0:19:39.720
<v Speaker 1>this is the best that is possible. We simply reject

0:19:39.800 --> 0:19:44.720
<v Speaker 1>the narrative that it's a few bad apples, because that

0:19:44.800 --> 0:19:49.080
<v Speaker 1>has been a narrative that has been People have tried

0:19:49.119 --> 0:19:53.359
<v Speaker 1>to establish that for decades, and people have tried to

0:19:53.400 --> 0:19:57.160
<v Speaker 1>say that training is something that is necessary for decades.

0:19:57.800 --> 0:20:00.840
<v Speaker 1>And I don't want to be born the whole life

0:20:00.920 --> 0:20:04.160
<v Speaker 1>and then die and still have that be a narrative

0:20:04.240 --> 0:20:08.440
<v Speaker 1>that is popular. A few bad apples, better training, et cetera. Right,

0:20:09.080 --> 0:20:11.159
<v Speaker 1>So I need you to understand who you're talking to

0:20:11.280 --> 0:20:15.159
<v Speaker 1>when I ask you these questions, because this title to

0:20:15.240 --> 0:20:17.359
<v Speaker 1>a person like me and indeed our listeners now I

0:20:17.400 --> 0:20:22.200
<v Speaker 1>know better, but a person like me, the title would

0:20:22.240 --> 0:20:26.320
<v Speaker 1>seem like it flies in the face of an agenda

0:20:27.200 --> 0:20:32.760
<v Speaker 1>that my people are trying to push, which is that

0:20:32.880 --> 0:20:37.879
<v Speaker 1>our lives have worth. And that is really the beginning, middle,

0:20:37.920 --> 0:20:41.000
<v Speaker 1>and end of the conversation. And when other people inject

0:20:41.960 --> 0:20:46.040
<v Speaker 1>other elements into the conversation, we take it as noise

0:20:46.600 --> 0:20:51.000
<v Speaker 1>or a subtle way of pushing back against our affirmation

0:20:51.600 --> 0:20:55.080
<v Speaker 1>of our lives having value. And then obviously you know

0:20:55.119 --> 0:20:57.800
<v Speaker 1>the story about Q and I with the trademark White

0:20:58.640 --> 0:21:01.639
<v Speaker 1>White Lives Matter, and that whole pushback as well. So

0:21:01.960 --> 0:21:05.199
<v Speaker 1>with that in mind, I want to ask you the

0:21:05.320 --> 0:21:09.840
<v Speaker 1>intentionality behind and the result, in other words, what you

0:21:09.960 --> 0:21:15.359
<v Speaker 1>learned of the do Cops Lives Matter initiative?

0:21:18.280 --> 0:21:22.480
<v Speaker 4>So that was that video, the video where I had

0:21:22.560 --> 0:21:23.240
<v Speaker 4>hitting camera.

0:21:24.119 --> 0:21:28.440
<v Speaker 3>So I'm not entirely sure. I'm, like I said, I'm

0:21:28.480 --> 0:21:29.400
<v Speaker 3>reading these titles.

0:21:29.880 --> 0:21:36.280
<v Speaker 4>I believe that video was actually particularly interesting video. Okay,

0:21:36.640 --> 0:21:40.080
<v Speaker 4>that video was This was the I believe the first

0:21:40.080 --> 0:21:41.720
<v Speaker 4>iteration of black Lives matter.

0:21:41.920 --> 0:21:44.879
<v Speaker 3>Okay, so we're talking twenty twelve, Trayvon Martin.

0:21:45.920 --> 0:21:47.840
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, that sounds exactly right. Okay, all right, let's go

0:21:48.400 --> 0:21:51.320
<v Speaker 4>and was trust. So, the narrative that was of course

0:21:51.800 --> 0:21:53.880
<v Speaker 4>being pushed then and to a sort of extent now,

0:21:54.480 --> 0:21:58.080
<v Speaker 4>was that there's a lot of hatred of police officers

0:21:58.160 --> 0:22:01.240
<v Speaker 4>within the black community. In fact, the video began with

0:22:01.320 --> 0:22:03.919
<v Speaker 4>me and a lot of my videos begin with me

0:22:04.080 --> 0:22:09.119
<v Speaker 4>in leftist white neighborhoods and then end with me in

0:22:09.160 --> 0:22:14.199
<v Speaker 4>black neighborhoods, and that video, I believe, began with me

0:22:14.640 --> 0:22:18.919
<v Speaker 4>in a white neighborhood, I believe Williamsburg, Brooklyn, and I

0:22:18.960 --> 0:22:22.560
<v Speaker 4>was interviewing white leftists and I asked them, how do

0:22:23.040 --> 0:22:26.560
<v Speaker 4>how do you think black people view the NYPD? And

0:22:27.480 --> 0:22:30.240
<v Speaker 4>to a man, every single person was rage on the street.

0:22:30.560 --> 0:22:33.679
<v Speaker 4>There's hatred of police officers. They find them all disgusting.

0:22:33.920 --> 0:22:35.879
<v Speaker 4>It was just over and over the same narrative, kind

0:22:35.920 --> 0:22:37.960
<v Speaker 4>of heard that, you know, it's just a hatred of

0:22:38.400 --> 0:22:41.639
<v Speaker 4>police officers by black people around the country. Then the

0:22:41.680 --> 0:22:46.760
<v Speaker 4>next shot was me in I believe West Harlem, I

0:22:46.840 --> 0:22:48.600
<v Speaker 4>could have been East Harlem, and I had a T

0:22:48.760 --> 0:22:53.520
<v Speaker 4>shirt that said, cops lives matter and hidden cameras, so

0:22:53.520 --> 0:22:55.840
<v Speaker 4>almoys knows I'm being on film. I was trying to

0:22:55.960 --> 0:22:58.000
<v Speaker 4>enlist what was the reaction I was going to get.

0:22:58.040 --> 0:23:01.680
<v Speaker 4>So it seemed provocative, right, particularly among the black particularly

0:23:01.720 --> 0:23:07.800
<v Speaker 4>when Black Lives Matter was happening, and the I didn't

0:23:07.800 --> 0:23:10.040
<v Speaker 4>know and with a lot with with some of my videos,

0:23:10.080 --> 0:23:11.639
<v Speaker 4>I kind of have a sense of what the response

0:23:11.720 --> 0:23:13.520
<v Speaker 4>going to be. This is one of the few videos

0:23:13.560 --> 0:23:15.520
<v Speaker 4>I really had no idea what the response was going

0:23:15.560 --> 0:23:22.359
<v Speaker 4>to be. And the response was I thought incredible. Almost

0:23:22.400 --> 0:23:25.280
<v Speaker 4>almost every single black person came up to me instead

0:23:25.320 --> 0:23:29.480
<v Speaker 4>of course, cops lives matter. How can we love supporting

0:23:29.480 --> 0:23:32.119
<v Speaker 4>the police officers? Of course we have problems, and they

0:23:32.160 --> 0:23:35.920
<v Speaker 4>start telling me stories in fact about how cops were

0:23:35.960 --> 0:23:39.560
<v Speaker 4>involved in their lives, saved them, help them. Some are black,

0:23:39.600 --> 0:23:43.119
<v Speaker 4>some were white. And it was a really interesting experience

0:23:43.119 --> 0:23:46.680
<v Speaker 4>where you got a perspective different than what the narrative

0:23:46.800 --> 0:23:48.800
<v Speaker 4>I was hearing in the media was. But how blacks

0:23:48.880 --> 0:23:49.960
<v Speaker 4>view police officers?

0:23:50.040 --> 0:23:53.040
<v Speaker 3>Sure? Sure, and I appreciate that. Obviously.

0:23:53.080 --> 0:23:57.760
<v Speaker 1>There's more titles. Do liberals know What's in the Iran deal? Ferguson.

0:23:57.800 --> 0:24:01.080
<v Speaker 1>Protesters called for Darren Wilson's death. What do you know

0:24:01.119 --> 0:24:05.119
<v Speaker 1>about the IRS and Obamacare after exposing or sorry and

0:24:05.200 --> 0:24:08.879
<v Speaker 1>exposing anti Israeli companies in Ireland. So this is just

0:24:08.920 --> 0:24:11.000
<v Speaker 1>the name of a few of these sort of specials

0:24:11.040 --> 0:24:14.200
<v Speaker 1>that you've done with titles like that, and I believe

0:24:14.240 --> 0:24:17.560
<v Speaker 1>that they're all much the same, like the one that

0:24:17.640 --> 0:24:21.199
<v Speaker 1>you described. I do want to offer something there that

0:24:22.280 --> 0:24:25.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, for a person like me, I recognize that

0:24:25.960 --> 0:24:30.399
<v Speaker 1>that illustrates and illuminates that black people are not a

0:24:30.440 --> 0:24:35.640
<v Speaker 1>hateful people. If we're painting with broad strokes, affirming our

0:24:35.680 --> 0:24:39.640
<v Speaker 1>lives doesn't mean that anyone else's life matters less. And

0:24:40.359 --> 0:24:44.880
<v Speaker 1>I think that it also suggests that black people can

0:24:45.119 --> 0:24:48.640
<v Speaker 1>be subject to the influences of a white supremacist society

0:24:48.680 --> 0:24:52.120
<v Speaker 1>A but also things like copaganda be the same as

0:24:52.160 --> 0:24:54.800
<v Speaker 1>any other person, and those of us who have higher

0:24:54.880 --> 0:24:57.280
<v Speaker 1>level thinking that can think critically about these things.

0:24:57.440 --> 0:25:00.399
<v Speaker 3>It's our duty to inform and now Platon