WEBVTT - How was antimatter discovered?

0:00:08.640 --> 0:00:12.680
<v Speaker 1>Hey, or Hey, did you know that there are physics truthers? What?

0:00:13.400 --> 0:00:15.880
<v Speaker 1>I know there are particle theorists, but I didn't know

0:00:15.920 --> 0:00:20.920
<v Speaker 1>there are conspiracy theorists. The conspiracy theorists some of them

0:00:21.040 --> 0:00:24.720
<v Speaker 1>don't believe that antimatter is a real thing, so they're

0:00:24.760 --> 0:00:29.560
<v Speaker 1>anti antimatter. All matter matters. What do they just think

0:00:29.600 --> 0:00:33.080
<v Speaker 1>that you made up this concept of antimatter? Yeah, it

0:00:33.080 --> 0:00:36.360
<v Speaker 1>turns out a lot of people don't think antimatter is real.

0:00:36.440 --> 0:00:39.440
<v Speaker 1>They don't believe in it. Well, maybe they just need proof,

0:00:39.479 --> 0:00:42.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, maybe they're not crazy, they're not bananas. Well

0:00:42.800 --> 0:00:48.239
<v Speaker 1>it turns out the proof is bananas. Who are bananas antimatter? No,

0:00:48.360 --> 0:01:08.199
<v Speaker 1>but it turns out bananas produce antimatter. Hi am Jorge,

0:01:08.200 --> 0:01:11.679
<v Speaker 1>I'm made particle physicist, and I'm Daniel. I'm a cartoonist,

0:01:12.200 --> 0:01:15.200
<v Speaker 1>but I'm not the author of PhD comics. And those

0:01:15.240 --> 0:01:18.119
<v Speaker 1>are the anti versions of the real us. The host

0:01:18.240 --> 0:01:21.440
<v Speaker 1>of this podcast, Daniel and Jorge explain the universe de

0:01:21.600 --> 0:01:25.240
<v Speaker 1>production of My Heart Radio. Although since you've been listening

0:01:25.280 --> 0:01:27.280
<v Speaker 1>to me talk and talk and talk for all these years,

0:01:27.280 --> 0:01:30.360
<v Speaker 1>by now you're basically a particle physicist. That's right. I

0:01:30.360 --> 0:01:32.560
<v Speaker 1>feel like I talked to you more than you probably

0:01:32.600 --> 0:01:35.600
<v Speaker 1>talked to your grad students, so probably should give me

0:01:35.600 --> 0:01:40.400
<v Speaker 1>a PhDs. Don't tell my grad students that do you

0:01:40.440 --> 0:01:42.480
<v Speaker 1>allow them to hear hear this podcast? Do you let

0:01:42.520 --> 0:01:44.400
<v Speaker 1>them out of their basement every once in a while.

0:01:44.840 --> 0:01:46.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm curious if they listen. I think I've mentioned it

0:01:46.959 --> 0:01:49.840
<v Speaker 1>to them. Actually, some of them appear in our interviews

0:01:49.920 --> 0:01:53.360
<v Speaker 1>from time to time. Oh, I see people who can't.

0:01:55.080 --> 0:01:58.160
<v Speaker 1>That's right. I wonder if it's extra stressful for them

0:01:58.280 --> 0:02:00.360
<v Speaker 1>if they say no, Are you going to judge them

0:02:00.800 --> 0:02:02.400
<v Speaker 1>based on what they know or don't know? No, I

0:02:02.400 --> 0:02:04.360
<v Speaker 1>think it's extra stressful if they say yes, and then

0:02:04.400 --> 0:02:07.080
<v Speaker 1>I asked them a particle physics question they really should

0:02:07.120 --> 0:02:09.480
<v Speaker 1>know the answer to. Then they're on the spot, and

0:02:09.520 --> 0:02:12.360
<v Speaker 1>you have them on tape. I have them on tape exactly,

0:02:12.520 --> 0:02:15.080
<v Speaker 1>but the podcast universe to listen, that's right. But the

0:02:15.200 --> 0:02:17.920
<v Speaker 1>goal of this podcast is not just to embarrass my

0:02:18.040 --> 0:02:20.360
<v Speaker 1>graduate students and put them on the spot, but to

0:02:20.440 --> 0:02:23.600
<v Speaker 1>teach all you people out there about the amazing universe

0:02:23.680 --> 0:02:26.959
<v Speaker 1>of particles and stars and bananas that we all get

0:02:27.000 --> 0:02:29.239
<v Speaker 1>to live in. That's right, All the things that exist

0:02:29.400 --> 0:02:31.320
<v Speaker 1>out there in the universe and all the things that

0:02:31.600 --> 0:02:35.600
<v Speaker 1>maybe don't exist or that exist in a constant state

0:02:35.800 --> 0:02:41.240
<v Speaker 1>of denial, that's right, or things that currently only exist

0:02:41.320 --> 0:02:44.320
<v Speaker 1>in the minds of particle theorists, ideas about what the

0:02:44.400 --> 0:02:47.000
<v Speaker 1>universe might be like that we don't know if they

0:02:47.040 --> 0:02:50.520
<v Speaker 1>are real, right, because even the things that might not

0:02:50.639 --> 0:02:53.360
<v Speaker 1>be real tell us a little bit about how things

0:02:53.480 --> 0:02:55.320
<v Speaker 1>really are and why they are there where they are right,

0:02:55.400 --> 0:02:57.360
<v Speaker 1>that's right. And in physics we have this sort of

0:02:57.360 --> 0:03:00.480
<v Speaker 1>cycle of people making predictions and saying, what if the

0:03:00.520 --> 0:03:02.679
<v Speaker 1>universe works this way, and then people going out to

0:03:02.760 --> 0:03:04.880
<v Speaker 1>check and say, hey, it turns out you were wrong.

0:03:05.000 --> 0:03:07.480
<v Speaker 1>Go back to the drawing board. And there are many

0:03:07.560 --> 0:03:10.400
<v Speaker 1>many beautiful theories out there that people came up with

0:03:10.720 --> 0:03:13.960
<v Speaker 1>that they were convinced we're real, but then we're confronted

0:03:13.960 --> 0:03:16.399
<v Speaker 1>by the evidence that they're not. That's right. There are

0:03:16.639 --> 0:03:20.720
<v Speaker 1>conspiracy theorists. Even in physics. There are people who are

0:03:20.760 --> 0:03:23.959
<v Speaker 1>skeptical about the things that physicists have found. Right, even

0:03:24.000 --> 0:03:27.120
<v Speaker 1>physicists themselves who are skeptical, Well, it's our job to

0:03:27.120 --> 0:03:28.840
<v Speaker 1>be skeptical, but we like to think that's sort of

0:03:28.840 --> 0:03:32.119
<v Speaker 1>a reason skepticism. You know, when presented with the evidence,

0:03:32.440 --> 0:03:35.080
<v Speaker 1>we don't come up with an even more elaborate conspiracy

0:03:35.120 --> 0:03:38.200
<v Speaker 1>theory to deny it. We accepted, we move on. But

0:03:38.240 --> 0:03:40.360
<v Speaker 1>it's true that some of these ideas that are in

0:03:40.400 --> 0:03:42.680
<v Speaker 1>the minds of physicists, they can be kind of hard

0:03:42.720 --> 0:03:44.920
<v Speaker 1>to accept, and some people still out there think that

0:03:44.960 --> 0:03:48.200
<v Speaker 1>they're just ideas, that they're not actually real, right, because

0:03:48.280 --> 0:03:50.680
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of an interesting cycle in physics where you

0:03:50.880 --> 0:03:52.800
<v Speaker 1>might see something in nature and then you come up

0:03:52.840 --> 0:03:54.880
<v Speaker 1>with the theory, and then you do an experiment that

0:03:55.320 --> 0:03:58.160
<v Speaker 1>validates or disproves this theory, and then you come up

0:03:58.200 --> 0:04:01.600
<v Speaker 1>with more theories, and so it's like this weird and

0:04:01.760 --> 0:04:05.680
<v Speaker 1>interesting loop, and so it's hard to tell sometimes where

0:04:05.720 --> 0:04:08.960
<v Speaker 1>ideas come from. Yeah, especially in particle physics, we seem

0:04:09.000 --> 0:04:12.720
<v Speaker 1>to obscolet between two modes. One is where theorists are

0:04:12.800 --> 0:04:15.240
<v Speaker 1>leading the field, where they have ideas for what they

0:04:15.280 --> 0:04:17.920
<v Speaker 1>think is happening in the universe, and then experimentalists have

0:04:17.960 --> 0:04:20.840
<v Speaker 1>to go out and basically check those ideas. And the

0:04:20.880 --> 0:04:23.880
<v Speaker 1>other mode is where experimentalists are taking the lead, where

0:04:23.880 --> 0:04:27.359
<v Speaker 1>we're out there finding crazy stuff nobody understands and theorists

0:04:27.400 --> 0:04:30.400
<v Speaker 1>are scrambling to keep up to explain all the bizarre

0:04:30.480 --> 0:04:32.640
<v Speaker 1>stuff that we've uncovered. So what do you think it's

0:04:32.760 --> 0:04:35.560
<v Speaker 1>that determines who's taking the lead. Is it like just

0:04:35.640 --> 0:04:38.000
<v Speaker 1>who has more free time in their hands to play

0:04:38.040 --> 0:04:43.440
<v Speaker 1>around and discover things, or who's more suspicious of the other.

0:04:43.640 --> 0:04:45.800
<v Speaker 1>It's just up to nature. It's just up to how

0:04:45.880 --> 0:04:48.440
<v Speaker 1>much stuff there is to discover. You know, in the

0:04:48.560 --> 0:04:51.559
<v Speaker 1>fifties and sixties, they were discovering a new particle every

0:04:51.560 --> 0:04:53.640
<v Speaker 1>time they turned on the accelerator. They called it the

0:04:53.680 --> 0:04:56.560
<v Speaker 1>era of the particle zoo. Whereas these days it's like

0:04:56.760 --> 0:04:59.920
<v Speaker 1>decades between particles, and that gives the theorists a lot

0:05:00.000 --> 0:05:02.320
<v Speaker 1>out of time to be creative, to come up with

0:05:02.320 --> 0:05:04.680
<v Speaker 1>new ideas, to say, maybe it's this, maybe it's that,

0:05:05.080 --> 0:05:07.560
<v Speaker 1>because we don't have anything to sort of constrain them

0:05:07.680 --> 0:05:10.400
<v Speaker 1>right now, we're in a really fury driven mode of

0:05:10.440 --> 0:05:12.400
<v Speaker 1>the field. Is there a song for the particles? I

0:05:12.400 --> 0:05:15.799
<v Speaker 1>feel like there should be a song particles, particle zoo

0:05:16.200 --> 0:05:21.880
<v Speaker 1>doing the things particles do. There you go wow on

0:05:22.040 --> 0:05:25.359
<v Speaker 1>the spot, jingle making that's right by. They might be

0:05:25.400 --> 0:05:32.200
<v Speaker 1>particle physicists PhD and jingle engineering, granted, but it's interesting

0:05:32.240 --> 0:05:34.600
<v Speaker 1>history right in the fifties, we were discovering new particles

0:05:34.640 --> 0:05:38.239
<v Speaker 1>nobody understood. And in the very early days of particle physics,

0:05:38.240 --> 0:05:41.120
<v Speaker 1>like the first particle was discovered, right, that wasn't predicted,

0:05:41.160 --> 0:05:44.120
<v Speaker 1>it was discovered, and then the photon was like thought

0:05:44.160 --> 0:05:47.080
<v Speaker 1>up to explain an experiment that people had seen. So

0:05:47.360 --> 0:05:50.360
<v Speaker 1>the very beginning it was driven by experiments. But these days,

0:05:50.400 --> 0:05:52.480
<v Speaker 1>of course it's driven more my theory. And so today

0:05:52.520 --> 0:05:56.360
<v Speaker 1>we'll be talking about one such thing that has been

0:05:56.400 --> 0:05:58.920
<v Speaker 1>seen or had that some people have seen in nature

0:05:59.080 --> 0:06:04.120
<v Speaker 1>and physics, but maybe some physicists don't really believe that

0:06:04.279 --> 0:06:06.839
<v Speaker 1>it exists. Oh, I think most physicists believe it, but

0:06:06.920 --> 0:06:10.720
<v Speaker 1>I just wonder about the general public. Oh so it's just, um,

0:06:10.960 --> 0:06:14.000
<v Speaker 1>you say true things, you mean physicists or people? I

0:06:14.040 --> 0:06:19.800
<v Speaker 1>mean people, because physicists or not people. Is that what

0:06:19.839 --> 0:06:22.120
<v Speaker 1>you're saying. You just trapped me. You totally led me

0:06:22.160 --> 0:06:26.160
<v Speaker 1>into a trap there, Daniel, Are you a person or

0:06:26.200 --> 0:06:31.080
<v Speaker 1>a physicist? Take one? No, I think that you know,

0:06:31.360 --> 0:06:33.400
<v Speaker 1>this is really fascinating because it's one of the first

0:06:33.440 --> 0:06:36.200
<v Speaker 1>things that was ever predicted before it was seen. This

0:06:36.240 --> 0:06:39.080
<v Speaker 1>is the first time somebody said, maybe this crazy new

0:06:39.160 --> 0:06:41.919
<v Speaker 1>thing does exist out there. In the universe, somebody go

0:06:42.160 --> 0:06:44.599
<v Speaker 1>look and sort of sort of the dawn of the

0:06:44.640 --> 0:06:47.839
<v Speaker 1>New era. And it's taken a long time for people

0:06:47.880 --> 0:06:50.920
<v Speaker 1>to believe that it's real, and some people out there

0:06:51.400 --> 0:06:54.479
<v Speaker 1>still don't. So I guess at some point this was

0:06:54.520 --> 0:06:56.920
<v Speaker 1>a topic where some people thought it was true, but

0:06:57.000 --> 0:06:59.920
<v Speaker 1>a lot of physicists maybe didn't think that we would

0:07:00.040 --> 0:07:02.720
<v Speaker 1>see it or that it would be proven to exist.

0:07:02.760 --> 0:07:06.280
<v Speaker 1>That's right. Between the prediction and its discovery. It was contentious,

0:07:06.520 --> 0:07:09.960
<v Speaker 1>and it's a pretty interesting topic because it talks about

0:07:10.080 --> 0:07:14.440
<v Speaker 1>a huge part of the universe that is both intriguing

0:07:14.560 --> 0:07:18.160
<v Speaker 1>and super dangerous. Yeah, and fascinating. And you hear all

0:07:18.200 --> 0:07:20.960
<v Speaker 1>about it in popular culture, like it's everywhere. It's even

0:07:20.960 --> 0:07:23.480
<v Speaker 1>in Dan Brown novels, so you know it's got to

0:07:23.520 --> 0:07:26.400
<v Speaker 1>be cool. Oh man, it must be true then if

0:07:26.400 --> 0:07:28.920
<v Speaker 1>it's a Dan Brown never Yeah, I think those are

0:07:28.960 --> 0:07:36.520
<v Speaker 1>all heavily researched. The Da Vinci particle. All right, Well,

0:07:36.600 --> 0:07:39.160
<v Speaker 1>so today on the podcast, we'll be asking the question,

0:07:44.680 --> 0:07:47.760
<v Speaker 1>how do we know antimatter is a thing or an

0:07:47.800 --> 0:07:50.240
<v Speaker 1>anti thing? What's the correct way to how do we

0:07:50.280 --> 0:07:53.120
<v Speaker 1>know antimatter is not a thing? Or how do we

0:07:53.200 --> 0:07:57.560
<v Speaker 1>not know that antimatter isn't not a thing? That's put

0:07:57.560 --> 0:08:00.920
<v Speaker 1>it more more negative, No, I and anti that kind

0:08:00.920 --> 0:08:03.160
<v Speaker 1>of use of language, Daniel. I think that often the

0:08:03.200 --> 0:08:05.760
<v Speaker 1>history of particle physics and the topic of particle physics

0:08:05.840 --> 0:08:08.520
<v Speaker 1>is framed from a theoretical point of view, like what

0:08:08.680 --> 0:08:10.960
<v Speaker 1>is our understanding of the particles? That it's out there?

0:08:11.000 --> 0:08:13.760
<v Speaker 1>And that's cool, But for me, I'm an experimentalist. I

0:08:13.760 --> 0:08:15.760
<v Speaker 1>want to know, like, how do we know these things?

0:08:15.840 --> 0:08:18.040
<v Speaker 1>Like you say, these particles exist, how do we know

0:08:18.080 --> 0:08:21.520
<v Speaker 1>that it's real? What experiment? What? What the thing happened

0:08:21.560 --> 0:08:23.560
<v Speaker 1>that proved to us that it had to be there,

0:08:23.560 --> 0:08:26.000
<v Speaker 1>that it's part of the universe. So we did a

0:08:26.040 --> 0:08:29.120
<v Speaker 1>podcast episode about how do we know even particles exist?

0:08:29.160 --> 0:08:31.880
<v Speaker 1>About the electron and how do we know photons exist

0:08:31.960 --> 0:08:34.400
<v Speaker 1>in this kind of stuff? And and why are their muans?

0:08:34.440 --> 0:08:36.360
<v Speaker 1>And so this is sort of in that series of

0:08:36.360 --> 0:08:40.040
<v Speaker 1>like telling people about the moment when we confronted something

0:08:40.280 --> 0:08:42.520
<v Speaker 1>that proved to us that this new thing had to

0:08:42.559 --> 0:08:44.920
<v Speaker 1>be a part of our universe. Yeah, and so antimatter

0:08:45.240 --> 0:08:48.640
<v Speaker 1>is a is a word or two words put together,

0:08:48.760 --> 0:08:52.560
<v Speaker 1>and we kind of know it's a thing, but we

0:08:52.559 --> 0:08:55.559
<v Speaker 1>were wondering how much people out there know about it,

0:08:55.720 --> 0:08:57.840
<v Speaker 1>or that they know that it is a thing and

0:08:57.920 --> 0:09:02.800
<v Speaker 1>not just one of those crazy physics ideas that are

0:09:02.800 --> 0:09:05.600
<v Speaker 1>floating around. Yeah. So I went around and my goal

0:09:05.800 --> 0:09:09.400
<v Speaker 1>was to ask people if they knew how anti matter

0:09:09.480 --> 0:09:11.680
<v Speaker 1>was discovered. But I had to back up because it

0:09:11.720 --> 0:09:13.719
<v Speaker 1>turns out a lot of people didn't even know that

0:09:13.760 --> 0:09:17.079
<v Speaker 1>anti matter actually had been discovered, so they didn't know

0:09:17.120 --> 0:09:20.800
<v Speaker 1>that it was a thing. Yeah, that was so surprising

0:09:20.800 --> 0:09:23.240
<v Speaker 1>to me. But listen to these interviews and thinks to yourself,

0:09:23.400 --> 0:09:26.520
<v Speaker 1>do you know how we discovered antimatter? Here's what people

0:09:26.559 --> 0:09:28.920
<v Speaker 1>had to say. I know about about it, I don't

0:09:28.920 --> 0:09:31.440
<v Speaker 1>know how they discovered it now, No, I don't have

0:09:31.600 --> 0:09:34.920
<v Speaker 1>heard of it, and like science fiction and stuff, um,

0:09:34.960 --> 0:09:37.920
<v Speaker 1>but I don't know how the logistics of it would

0:09:38.040 --> 0:09:41.439
<v Speaker 1>even be possible. So I'm not too sure. But I know,

0:09:41.559 --> 0:09:43.319
<v Speaker 1>like the phrase I've heard it like a lot of

0:09:43.600 --> 0:09:45.920
<v Speaker 1>is it a real thing or just science fiction? I like,

0:09:46.000 --> 0:09:49.080
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of like theory, So it's not too sure.

0:09:49.559 --> 0:09:53.439
<v Speaker 1>I think they are because I read it something about

0:09:53.440 --> 0:09:58.000
<v Speaker 1>it keeping the universe from expanding too fast? So how

0:09:58.000 --> 0:09:59.640
<v Speaker 1>do we know anti matter is a real thing? Like?

0:10:00.320 --> 0:10:04.480
<v Speaker 1>How was it discovered. I don't know exactly, but my

0:10:04.559 --> 0:10:08.920
<v Speaker 1>best guess is that that it could be shown through

0:10:08.960 --> 0:10:11.920
<v Speaker 1>like how the universe expands. But it seems like it's

0:10:11.920 --> 0:10:16.040
<v Speaker 1>being limited by a certain the end. It's predicted to

0:10:16.040 --> 0:10:20.200
<v Speaker 1>the antimatter Right now, it's all theoretical, isn't I don't like,

0:10:20.280 --> 0:10:23.680
<v Speaker 1>have we actually done anything with like large hangar clider

0:10:23.760 --> 0:10:26.880
<v Speaker 1>as far as any matter? Yeah, I'm not sure. I

0:10:26.920 --> 0:10:29.880
<v Speaker 1>don't know. I don't know what that means for now.

0:10:29.960 --> 0:10:33.160
<v Speaker 1>It's it is just an idea surreal thing. Okay, how

0:10:33.200 --> 0:10:39.839
<v Speaker 1>do we know it exists? By calculation? To make your

0:10:41.240 --> 0:10:47.280
<v Speaker 1>to accommodate the amount of our understanding of matter in

0:10:47.320 --> 0:10:50.360
<v Speaker 1>the universe? Do you think matter? I thought there was

0:10:50.400 --> 0:10:53.520
<v Speaker 1>some anti matter dirt matter connection, Okay, not that I'm

0:10:53.520 --> 0:10:59.000
<v Speaker 1>aware of. Don't know. Don't antimatter Well, it's like I'm

0:10:59.040 --> 0:11:03.920
<v Speaker 1>kind of doesn't exist. I mean, if it were. No, wait,

0:11:04.480 --> 0:11:06.160
<v Speaker 1>because it goes to show that I know nothing about

0:11:06.160 --> 0:11:11.600
<v Speaker 1>particle physics. But there's something. I mean, listen to my

0:11:11.640 --> 0:11:14.760
<v Speaker 1>podcast for office. I would love to listen to your podcast,

0:11:14.840 --> 0:11:17.520
<v Speaker 1>and I'm sure that that there's something I would learn

0:11:17.559 --> 0:11:22.000
<v Speaker 1>from it. Antimatter is a real thing as a it's

0:11:22.040 --> 0:11:25.960
<v Speaker 1>a counterpart to a regular matter rights. How do we

0:11:26.000 --> 0:11:30.280
<v Speaker 1>know it exists because to create matter, you have to

0:11:30.360 --> 0:11:34.600
<v Speaker 1>also create antimatter, and it's been a proven reaction, and

0:11:35.559 --> 0:11:39.440
<v Speaker 1>we know that it exists despite not being able to

0:11:39.920 --> 0:11:43.280
<v Speaker 1>necessarily detect. I have not heard of that term actually,

0:11:43.520 --> 0:11:46.760
<v Speaker 1>all right, So it sort of seems like people are

0:11:47.160 --> 0:11:50.400
<v Speaker 1>skeptical about it, or they weren't. Not a lot of

0:11:50.400 --> 0:11:53.000
<v Speaker 1>people seem sure that it is a thing, Like they

0:11:53.040 --> 0:11:56.480
<v Speaker 1>talk about it like it's a theoretical thing, or it's

0:11:56.559 --> 0:12:00.480
<v Speaker 1>not proven, or it's an idea. Maybe actually I just

0:12:00.480 --> 0:12:03.120
<v Speaker 1>realized maybe it's because it's in a Dan Brown novel

0:12:03.200 --> 0:12:05.160
<v Speaker 1>and they thought, oh well, then it must be b Yes,

0:12:06.840 --> 0:12:10.040
<v Speaker 1>thank you, Dan Brown. And that should be called like

0:12:10.120 --> 0:12:15.800
<v Speaker 1>anti science communication anti science. I don't think he claims

0:12:15.800 --> 0:12:19.280
<v Speaker 1>to be a scientist or claims to be a work

0:12:19.280 --> 0:12:22.520
<v Speaker 1>of nonfiction. No, But you know, when he made that movie,

0:12:22.640 --> 0:12:25.079
<v Speaker 1>of course, we're referring to Angels and Demons, Dan Brown's

0:12:25.080 --> 0:12:27.800
<v Speaker 1>novel about an anti matter bomb, in which the science

0:12:27.920 --> 0:12:30.280
<v Speaker 1>is mostly right actually about antime matter. But when they

0:12:30.320 --> 0:12:33.439
<v Speaker 1>made yeah they did, um yeah, yeah, the science in

0:12:33.480 --> 0:12:36.559
<v Speaker 1>there's is mostly correct. But they made that movie. They

0:12:36.640 --> 0:12:38.839
<v Speaker 1>filmed it actually where I was working at the time,

0:12:38.880 --> 0:12:41.640
<v Speaker 1>because I was at Sern and they were filming the

0:12:41.679 --> 0:12:44.120
<v Speaker 1>movie at Stern and uh, and then I wanted to

0:12:44.120 --> 0:12:46.439
<v Speaker 1>get a camera. What's that did you get? Did you

0:12:46.440 --> 0:12:49.120
<v Speaker 1>get a camera? Next? With Tom Hanks? Only the most

0:12:49.240 --> 0:12:50.640
<v Speaker 1>v I P of v I P has got to

0:12:50.679 --> 0:12:52.760
<v Speaker 1>give Tom Hanks a tour. So I was like, not

0:12:52.840 --> 0:12:55.400
<v Speaker 1>even in the top five list of people who would

0:12:55.440 --> 0:12:58.480
<v Speaker 1>get to have lunch with Tom Hanks, unfortunately, But now

0:12:58.800 --> 0:13:03.000
<v Speaker 1>now you now you would be making the top Yeah,

0:13:03.040 --> 0:13:06.079
<v Speaker 1>I'm really moving up. But the cool thing was when

0:13:06.080 --> 0:13:09.360
<v Speaker 1>I watched the movie, they had taken our like normal

0:13:09.520 --> 0:13:12.400
<v Speaker 1>boring workspaces, which which is basically just a bunch of

0:13:12.440 --> 0:13:15.360
<v Speaker 1>computers and screens, and they had science fictioned it up,

0:13:15.720 --> 0:13:18.760
<v Speaker 1>so people had like cool heads of displays and like

0:13:18.960 --> 0:13:26.240
<v Speaker 1>fancy interfaces with their computers, las, lasers and scanning devices.

0:13:26.240 --> 0:13:28.680
<v Speaker 1>And I thought, that looks pretty cool. We should upgrade

0:13:28.880 --> 0:13:30.920
<v Speaker 1>the way our office works to look like the movie.

0:13:30.920 --> 0:13:33.079
<v Speaker 1>You're like taking your pocket and looking at a metal key.

0:13:33.120 --> 0:13:38.160
<v Speaker 1>You're like reality versus world. But it was cool to

0:13:38.160 --> 0:13:41.880
<v Speaker 1>see what like Hollywood's best designers would do with my office.

0:13:42.000 --> 0:13:44.680
<v Speaker 1>Pretty cool, all right, So it seems like people are

0:13:44.800 --> 0:13:47.600
<v Speaker 1>not quite sure that it's real. They think it's maybe theoretical.

0:13:47.640 --> 0:13:50.520
<v Speaker 1>Do you think maybe they were confusing antimatter with other

0:13:51.240 --> 0:13:55.720
<v Speaker 1>things like dark matter or yes, absolutely, I hear that

0:13:55.760 --> 0:13:58.840
<v Speaker 1>a lot. Actually, I think that people know that there's

0:13:58.880 --> 0:14:01.600
<v Speaker 1>something out there is a miss dearious counterpart to matter.

0:14:01.960 --> 0:14:04.199
<v Speaker 1>And it turns out there's sort of a few mysterious

0:14:04.200 --> 0:14:07.400
<v Speaker 1>counterparts to matter. Right, there's this whole antimatteric thing. It's

0:14:07.480 --> 0:14:11.400
<v Speaker 1>dark matter that there's super particles, and so there's antimatters,

0:14:11.400 --> 0:14:17.200
<v Speaker 1>there's quasi matter, there's matter, there's exotic matter. You know, yeah,

0:14:17.280 --> 0:14:19.840
<v Speaker 1>I know that's a real potentially could be a thing thing.

0:14:20.400 --> 0:14:26.120
<v Speaker 1>Splatter matter, there's mats matter, and now you're making me

0:14:26.240 --> 0:14:29.320
<v Speaker 1>matter matter um. And so there's sort of a lot

0:14:29.360 --> 0:14:31.240
<v Speaker 1>of different ideas to keep track of. And so if

0:14:31.240 --> 0:14:34.200
<v Speaker 1>you're not like a particle physicists like you are, then

0:14:34.280 --> 0:14:36.760
<v Speaker 1>maybe it's hard to keep your finger on which ones

0:14:36.800 --> 0:14:39.200
<v Speaker 1>are real and which ones are theoretical. Right, And I

0:14:39.240 --> 0:14:42.880
<v Speaker 1>have to say, antimatter does sound a little ridiculous, does it.

0:14:42.880 --> 0:14:46.800
<v Speaker 1>It sounds very like nineties fifties science fitching. It's antimatter,

0:14:47.040 --> 0:14:50.400
<v Speaker 1>it's like matter, but it's anti The whole concept is absurd, right,

0:14:50.400 --> 0:14:52.800
<v Speaker 1>But as we said on this podcast, absurdity is no

0:14:52.920 --> 0:14:56.680
<v Speaker 1>obstacle to reality. Right. Turns out the universe is kind

0:14:56.720 --> 0:14:59.200
<v Speaker 1>of bonkers. Yeah, I feel that way every time I

0:14:59.240 --> 0:15:02.520
<v Speaker 1>read the news every morning these days. It used to

0:15:02.560 --> 0:15:07.200
<v Speaker 1>be just physics, and now it's also politics. Is bomb beers.

0:15:07.200 --> 0:15:10.000
<v Speaker 1>But anyways, um so yeah, let's talk about anti matter.

0:15:10.040 --> 0:15:12.040
<v Speaker 1>And we have a whole episode about anti matter. If

0:15:12.080 --> 0:15:14.760
<v Speaker 1>you scrolled through our archive, you can find that episode

0:15:14.800 --> 0:15:16.880
<v Speaker 1>and learn a little bit more about it. But here

0:15:16.920 --> 0:15:19.200
<v Speaker 1>we'll just kind of go over quickly about what it

0:15:19.280 --> 0:15:22.720
<v Speaker 1>is and how it's not actually dark matter. That's right.

0:15:22.760 --> 0:15:26.119
<v Speaker 1>Antimatter is not dark matter. It's a whole other, enormous,

0:15:26.160 --> 0:15:29.880
<v Speaker 1>fascinating puzzle about the universe. Anti matter is a statement

0:15:29.880 --> 0:15:35.040
<v Speaker 1>about particles and patterns. It's noticing that particles come in pairs.

0:15:35.160 --> 0:15:38.120
<v Speaker 1>And so some of the particles that we've discovered, the electron,

0:15:38.240 --> 0:15:41.960
<v Speaker 1>the muan, the corks, there's another particle that looks just

0:15:42.280 --> 0:15:45.760
<v Speaker 1>like them, except it's the opposite in a couple of ways.

0:15:46.400 --> 0:15:48.720
<v Speaker 1>And so, for example, the electron is a particle. We

0:15:48.760 --> 0:15:50.280
<v Speaker 1>know it, we love it, we're made of it. It's

0:15:50.320 --> 0:15:53.520
<v Speaker 1>in ice cream. And there's this other particle called the positron,

0:15:53.760 --> 0:15:56.560
<v Speaker 1>which is just like the electron accepted, has a positive

0:15:56.600 --> 0:15:59.680
<v Speaker 1>charge instead of a negative charge. It has other negative

0:15:59.720 --> 0:16:03.000
<v Speaker 1>things about it, right, like the opposite spin or the

0:16:03.120 --> 0:16:07.080
<v Speaker 1>opposite quantum color, and other kinds of charges, right that

0:16:07.120 --> 0:16:09.960
<v Speaker 1>are different. Some of the other charges for the for

0:16:09.960 --> 0:16:12.800
<v Speaker 1>the forces are opposite. The electron actually doesn't have a

0:16:12.800 --> 0:16:15.760
<v Speaker 1>color because it's doesn't feel the strong force, but it

0:16:15.840 --> 0:16:18.680
<v Speaker 1>has the same mass and spin. So the positron are

0:16:18.720 --> 0:16:22.000
<v Speaker 1>the same in mass and quantum spin. They're both spin

0:16:22.080 --> 0:16:24.120
<v Speaker 1>one half, and they have exactly the same mass as

0:16:24.120 --> 0:16:26.880
<v Speaker 1>far as we know, but they have the opposite electric charge.

0:16:27.240 --> 0:16:28.600
<v Speaker 1>And so you might just say like, oh, well, it's

0:16:28.640 --> 0:16:30.960
<v Speaker 1>just a different particle, and it is. It's a different particle,

0:16:31.200 --> 0:16:34.240
<v Speaker 1>but there's definitely a relationship there. So we group them together.

0:16:34.280 --> 0:16:36.000
<v Speaker 1>And this is what we do all the time in physics,

0:16:36.000 --> 0:16:38.640
<v Speaker 1>and especially in particle physics, is we're looking for patterns.

0:16:38.640 --> 0:16:41.680
<v Speaker 1>We're looking for, you know, relationships that help us simplify.

0:16:41.720 --> 0:16:44.480
<v Speaker 1>We're looking for symmetries that give us insight. And so

0:16:44.560 --> 0:16:47.160
<v Speaker 1>it's interesting not just because the electron has this weird

0:16:47.240 --> 0:16:50.520
<v Speaker 1>partner particle, But so does the muan, and so do

0:16:50.600 --> 0:16:53.440
<v Speaker 1>all the quarks, right, and and we call it matter

0:16:53.840 --> 0:16:57.360
<v Speaker 1>and antimatter because the ones we call matter are the

0:16:57.360 --> 0:16:59.800
<v Speaker 1>ones that make of most of the things we see.

0:16:59.840 --> 0:17:03.880
<v Speaker 1>A round is right, like positrons and anti mu as

0:17:03.880 --> 0:17:06.440
<v Speaker 1>an anti quarks. I'm not made of any of these things.

0:17:06.560 --> 0:17:10.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm made out of the regular versions, the provisions. That's right,

0:17:10.680 --> 0:17:12.600
<v Speaker 1>you're made of the regular versions. But you're right also

0:17:12.640 --> 0:17:15.320
<v Speaker 1>that we call them regular versions because they're familiar. They're

0:17:15.359 --> 0:17:17.520
<v Speaker 1>like the first ones we encountered, because they make up

0:17:17.720 --> 0:17:21.040
<v Speaker 1>the world we know, and so there's nothing anti about

0:17:21.080 --> 0:17:23.440
<v Speaker 1>the other ones. They're just sort of not the first

0:17:23.440 --> 0:17:26.000
<v Speaker 1>ones we found. Maybe maybe a different word might be

0:17:26.040 --> 0:17:29.960
<v Speaker 1>like mirror matter or symmetric matter that's actually already taken.

0:17:30.000 --> 0:17:32.479
<v Speaker 1>There's a whole other theory about mirror matter we can

0:17:32.480 --> 0:17:35.359
<v Speaker 1>talk about another time. But it's a crowded field of

0:17:35.440 --> 0:17:38.240
<v Speaker 1>terrible names for particles, and you're running out of English

0:17:38.280 --> 0:17:42.320
<v Speaker 1>words to append to your existing physics concepts. Banana matter taken.

0:17:42.680 --> 0:17:45.080
<v Speaker 1>Banana matter is not even an idea yet, not until

0:17:45.160 --> 0:17:47.760
<v Speaker 1>this podcast comes out. Is banana matter not ever a

0:17:47.840 --> 0:17:50.840
<v Speaker 1>phrase anybody's effer Herd in their mind. But it's fascinating

0:17:50.880 --> 0:17:52.879
<v Speaker 1>because it seems to be like a thing. It's like

0:17:52.960 --> 0:17:56.240
<v Speaker 1>a symmetry in the world, you know, like a lot

0:17:56.280 --> 0:17:58.600
<v Speaker 1>of these particles which exist, there is also this other

0:17:58.680 --> 0:18:01.199
<v Speaker 1>one of them in the same way that we notice

0:18:01.320 --> 0:18:04.840
<v Speaker 1>that electrons and muans and taws have a relationship, right,

0:18:04.960 --> 0:18:07.560
<v Speaker 1>They all have the same electric charge and the same

0:18:07.640 --> 0:18:10.679
<v Speaker 1>weak interaction, and they're organized in a similar way, but

0:18:10.720 --> 0:18:13.840
<v Speaker 1>they have different masses. So it's like these different directions

0:18:13.880 --> 0:18:16.840
<v Speaker 1>along which patterns sort of form. All these particles are

0:18:17.080 --> 0:18:19.639
<v Speaker 1>kind of different versions of each other, Like one of

0:18:19.680 --> 0:18:21.760
<v Speaker 1>them has a little bit of this more, or this

0:18:21.800 --> 0:18:23.720
<v Speaker 1>one has the opposite of that more. But they're all

0:18:23.720 --> 0:18:27.280
<v Speaker 1>sort of particles that we know and love because some

0:18:27.359 --> 0:18:29.320
<v Speaker 1>of them make us who we are, that's right, And

0:18:29.440 --> 0:18:31.280
<v Speaker 1>we're tempted to define one of them is like the

0:18:31.359 --> 0:18:33.920
<v Speaker 1>normal one. But again that's just the first one we discovered.

0:18:33.960 --> 0:18:37.520
<v Speaker 1>It's like, you know, what's real chocolate, dark chocolate or

0:18:37.680 --> 0:18:39.679
<v Speaker 1>white chocolate. You know, maybe if you grew up in

0:18:39.680 --> 0:18:41.960
<v Speaker 1>a family or white chocolate was the first thing you ate,

0:18:42.000 --> 0:18:44.880
<v Speaker 1>then dark chocolate would seem to be like the anti chocolate,

0:18:44.920 --> 0:18:49.800
<v Speaker 1>do you right? Yeah, that I think we should we

0:18:49.800 --> 0:18:54.760
<v Speaker 1>should do that, just call it anti chocolate. Um. And

0:18:54.760 --> 0:18:58.359
<v Speaker 1>and and remember also the antimatter is has positive mass,

0:18:58.520 --> 0:19:00.760
<v Speaker 1>right as far as we oh, it's made of the

0:19:00.800 --> 0:19:04.720
<v Speaker 1>same kind of stuff, and so it is antimatter because

0:19:04.760 --> 0:19:07.840
<v Speaker 1>it has the opposite charge. And if you collide matter

0:19:07.880 --> 0:19:10.840
<v Speaker 1>and antimatter, they interact and turned into light and turned

0:19:10.840 --> 0:19:14.200
<v Speaker 1>into energy. But in that sense, they're just more matter.

0:19:14.400 --> 0:19:17.200
<v Speaker 1>It's just you know, they have this relationship. We could

0:19:17.200 --> 0:19:19.119
<v Speaker 1>have called it something other than antimatter. We could have

0:19:19.119 --> 0:19:22.280
<v Speaker 1>called it, called it oppositely charged matter, or something that's

0:19:22.320 --> 0:19:26.399
<v Speaker 1>a little bit longer to fit into it didn't focus

0:19:26.400 --> 0:19:31.200
<v Speaker 1>group as well. Yeah, alright, so that's what antimatter is.

0:19:31.320 --> 0:19:34.359
<v Speaker 1>And there's this whole mystery about how most of the

0:19:34.440 --> 0:19:37.159
<v Speaker 1>universe seems to be matter and not antimatter, which we

0:19:37.240 --> 0:19:40.879
<v Speaker 1>got into into in our last podcast about antimatter. But

0:19:40.960 --> 0:19:44.280
<v Speaker 1>in this case, this one is more about how we

0:19:44.440 --> 0:19:47.399
<v Speaker 1>discovered it and how we know that it actually is

0:19:47.400 --> 0:19:50.520
<v Speaker 1>a thing. Right, that's right. The history of antimatter is

0:19:50.640 --> 0:19:53.800
<v Speaker 1>like almost a hundred years old now, um, it's sort

0:19:53.800 --> 0:19:57.840
<v Speaker 1>of surprising, but positrons, the first antimatter particle ever discovered,

0:19:58.040 --> 0:20:01.240
<v Speaker 1>were found You know in nineteen thirty two, so we've

0:20:01.280 --> 0:20:04.320
<v Speaker 1>known about them for a long long time, which kind

0:20:04.359 --> 0:20:07.760
<v Speaker 1>of surprised me that people still don't necessarily believe that

0:20:07.760 --> 0:20:09.720
<v Speaker 1>they're a thing or are aware that it's a thing,

0:20:09.800 --> 0:20:12.880
<v Speaker 1>because it's been a thing for decades. People, Right, Well,

0:20:12.920 --> 0:20:16.960
<v Speaker 1>I think antimatter is anti celebrating birthdays, so that's probably

0:20:17.040 --> 0:20:20.640
<v Speaker 1>why maybe nobody has noticed. But let's get let's get

0:20:20.640 --> 0:20:23.959
<v Speaker 1>into whether or not antimatter really is real or theoretical,

0:20:24.040 --> 0:20:26.760
<v Speaker 1>and how we know that it's real or anti real,

0:20:27.400 --> 0:20:29.760
<v Speaker 1>whatever the case may be. But first let's take a

0:20:29.840 --> 0:20:46.840
<v Speaker 1>quick break, all right, Daniel, So antimatter is real, whereas

0:20:46.840 --> 0:20:50.320
<v Speaker 1>an anti real or anti fake, which makes it real.

0:20:51.000 --> 0:20:55.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm so confused. It's really really anti anti real. So yes,

0:20:56.160 --> 0:21:01.480
<v Speaker 1>it's real. That did not help. Okay, So it's real

0:21:01.560 --> 0:21:06.000
<v Speaker 1>in the sense that not only can it exist in theory,

0:21:06.440 --> 0:21:09.719
<v Speaker 1>but you can actually like see and touch antimatter. You

0:21:09.760 --> 0:21:13.280
<v Speaker 1>can see in touch antimatter. I don't recommend actually touching

0:21:13.320 --> 0:21:17.400
<v Speaker 1>any antimatter because it's quite reactive. But it is a thing.

0:21:17.480 --> 0:21:19.760
<v Speaker 1>And you know, there's sort of two ways something can

0:21:19.840 --> 0:21:23.080
<v Speaker 1>be a thing. One is it's in the list of

0:21:23.160 --> 0:21:26.760
<v Speaker 1>particles that can exist in the universe, like the potential particles,

0:21:27.440 --> 0:21:29.520
<v Speaker 1>and the other is that it's actually made, that it

0:21:29.640 --> 0:21:33.199
<v Speaker 1>really exists. You can imagine a universe where that's cold

0:21:33.240 --> 0:21:35.480
<v Speaker 1>and dead and the only thing in it our photons,

0:21:35.520 --> 0:21:38.159
<v Speaker 1>for example, and you could in theory and that universe

0:21:38.200 --> 0:21:40.959
<v Speaker 1>have electrons. It just don't exist. Right, So one thing

0:21:41.080 --> 0:21:43.240
<v Speaker 1>is like being on the list of potential particles, the

0:21:43.240 --> 0:21:47.040
<v Speaker 1>other is actually existing an antimatter is both, but started

0:21:47.080 --> 0:21:49.760
<v Speaker 1>off on the theoretical list and then people actually found it.

0:21:49.920 --> 0:21:52.680
<v Speaker 1>You mean, people looked at the equations of the universe

0:21:52.760 --> 0:21:54.439
<v Speaker 1>at the time and they said, you know, we have

0:21:54.520 --> 0:21:58.160
<v Speaker 1>a little pocket here where there could be like an

0:21:58.160 --> 0:22:01.840
<v Speaker 1>electron with a positive charge. Like, there's nothing that would

0:22:01.840 --> 0:22:05.240
<v Speaker 1>prevent the equations from making this real. So you're saying

0:22:05.280 --> 0:22:07.360
<v Speaker 1>that's one way that something can be real if it's there,

0:22:07.600 --> 0:22:11.920
<v Speaker 1>if the equations point to it as being possible. Yeah,

0:22:12.080 --> 0:22:14.560
<v Speaker 1>and more than just the equation saying it's possible, you

0:22:14.560 --> 0:22:16.959
<v Speaker 1>could prove that it exists. But it doesn't have to

0:22:17.000 --> 0:22:20.879
<v Speaker 1>always actually exist, you know, like the Higgs boson, right,

0:22:20.880 --> 0:22:23.320
<v Speaker 1>the Higgs boson. We know it it's a thing, but

0:22:23.400 --> 0:22:26.439
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't actually like get created very often you know

0:22:26.560 --> 0:22:29.760
<v Speaker 1>you have you have specially need very special circumstances to

0:22:29.840 --> 0:22:33.280
<v Speaker 1>actually make one. So it's sort of like knowing that

0:22:33.320 --> 0:22:36.360
<v Speaker 1>the recipe works and actually making the cake. Right, It's

0:22:36.359 --> 0:22:39.320
<v Speaker 1>like unicorns can exist, but maybe they're just technically aren't

0:22:39.359 --> 0:22:46.040
<v Speaker 1>in right now the unicorns, what's the difference here, Daniel?

0:22:46.840 --> 0:22:51.159
<v Speaker 1>But and the matter is real. It occurs naturally in

0:22:51.240 --> 0:22:53.920
<v Speaker 1>cosmic rays. You don't actually need like a particle collider

0:22:54.000 --> 0:22:56.840
<v Speaker 1>or special physics lab to make it. It's created in

0:22:56.920 --> 0:22:59.919
<v Speaker 1>collisions in the atmosphere. Um, every time you have rate,

0:23:00.000 --> 0:23:04.040
<v Speaker 1>you active decay, you can create antimatter. Sometimes these decays

0:23:04.040 --> 0:23:07.880
<v Speaker 1>will create anti neutrinos or anti electrons or stuff like this.

0:23:08.119 --> 0:23:13.560
<v Speaker 1>Really in our atmosphere, we're getting rained down. Wait, it's

0:23:13.560 --> 0:23:16.720
<v Speaker 1>it's like regular matter is coming from the Sun as

0:23:16.720 --> 0:23:20.359
<v Speaker 1>cosmic rads hitting the atmosphere, and then in those collisions

0:23:20.359 --> 0:23:24.680
<v Speaker 1>you're saying antimatter is produced. That's right. Antimatter and matter

0:23:24.760 --> 0:23:27.720
<v Speaker 1>can turn into each other, right. Um Photons, for example,

0:23:27.920 --> 0:23:31.760
<v Speaker 1>can turn into a pair at an electron and apositron

0:23:31.880 --> 0:23:34.359
<v Speaker 1>one is matter? What is antimatter? All you have to

0:23:34.359 --> 0:23:36.280
<v Speaker 1>do is follow the rules of physics, which say, like

0:23:36.440 --> 0:23:39.439
<v Speaker 1>conserve electric charge. But if you have photons, they can

0:23:39.520 --> 0:23:41.600
<v Speaker 1>turn into matter and antimatter. So you have in the

0:23:41.640 --> 0:23:45.040
<v Speaker 1>atmosphere because of cosmic rays, you have all these crazy complicated,

0:23:45.080 --> 0:23:47.600
<v Speaker 1>high energy collisions, and some of those just turned into

0:23:47.640 --> 0:23:52.560
<v Speaker 1>antimatter particles. Does that mean we're constantly and currently being

0:23:52.840 --> 0:23:58.400
<v Speaker 1>rained down upon by antimatter? Absolutely? It is antimatter rain.

0:23:59.560 --> 0:24:02.320
<v Speaker 1>I think that is a song by Prince wasn't it? Yeah,

0:24:02.400 --> 0:24:09.359
<v Speaker 1>anti Prince Um. But the wait I thought it was dangerous.

0:24:09.359 --> 0:24:12.040
<v Speaker 1>How can I be getting rained on by antimatter and

0:24:12.240 --> 0:24:15.640
<v Speaker 1>not exploding like you said I would? It is dangerous

0:24:15.640 --> 0:24:18.960
<v Speaker 1>in high quantities, but there's not that much antimatter, Just

0:24:19.040 --> 0:24:21.800
<v Speaker 1>like you know, there's radiation coming from the upper atmosphere

0:24:21.840 --> 0:24:24.639
<v Speaker 1>all the time, and radiation is also dangerous. You know,

0:24:24.720 --> 0:24:26.840
<v Speaker 1>protons and muans that go through your body have the

0:24:27.000 --> 0:24:30.120
<v Speaker 1>opportunity to damage your DNA, but there's not that much

0:24:30.119 --> 0:24:32.000
<v Speaker 1>of them, And so the higher you go up in

0:24:32.040 --> 0:24:35.160
<v Speaker 1>the atmosphere, the more there there is just particle radiation,

0:24:35.200 --> 0:24:37.920
<v Speaker 1>and some of that is antimatter. So what happens if

0:24:37.960 --> 0:24:42.879
<v Speaker 1>a positron hits your arm, Well, it encounters an electron

0:24:43.200 --> 0:24:46.520
<v Speaker 1>and it turns into a photon. That photon has the

0:24:46.640 --> 0:24:50.359
<v Speaker 1>energy that's the equivalent twice the mass of the electron

0:24:50.520 --> 0:24:53.240
<v Speaker 1>because all that mask got turned into a photon. But

0:24:53.320 --> 0:24:57.000
<v Speaker 1>that's not that much, so you know, you one photon

0:24:57.040 --> 0:25:00.800
<v Speaker 1>gets created. Should I be wearing anti sunscreen? Then said,

0:25:01.680 --> 0:25:03.479
<v Speaker 1>there's no sunscreen. You can wear it to protect your

0:25:03.600 --> 0:25:05.960
<v Speaker 1>things that matter or just antimatter. Just make me glow

0:25:06.640 --> 0:25:09.720
<v Speaker 1>in a way that's desirable. Antimatter. It gives you an

0:25:09.720 --> 0:25:13.680
<v Speaker 1>anti tan, So actually what you want to do? Yeah,

0:25:13.680 --> 0:25:16.040
<v Speaker 1>you do look brighter, I guess in a way, so

0:25:16.160 --> 0:25:18.960
<v Speaker 1>it's almost like you're The amazing thing about antimatter, though,

0:25:19.080 --> 0:25:21.640
<v Speaker 1>is that it is really energy dense because it converts

0:25:21.680 --> 0:25:23.919
<v Speaker 1>all of the masses inside of it into energy. So

0:25:23.960 --> 0:25:26.960
<v Speaker 1>if you had, for example, like a raisin's worth of antimatter,

0:25:27.000 --> 0:25:30.040
<v Speaker 1>which is a lot more than one positron, right it's

0:25:30.119 --> 0:25:33.359
<v Speaker 1>ten to the twenty three particles or something, then that

0:25:33.400 --> 0:25:36.600
<v Speaker 1>would be as much energy as a nuclear bomb exploding.

0:25:36.760 --> 0:25:39.480
<v Speaker 1>But again that's a much bigger dose. And in the

0:25:39.520 --> 0:25:42.199
<v Speaker 1>atmosphere you get you know, a few few positrons at

0:25:42.240 --> 0:25:45.160
<v Speaker 1>a time, and it's not just the atmosphere. Your favorite

0:25:45.160 --> 0:25:50.720
<v Speaker 1>snack actually is an antimatter of factory. What. Yeah, a

0:25:50.840 --> 0:25:54.200
<v Speaker 1>random banana has potassium in it. As we've mentioned before,

0:25:54.240 --> 0:25:59.720
<v Speaker 1>potassium is unstable and it decays radioactively and produces one

0:25:59.760 --> 0:26:05.080
<v Speaker 1>positron every seventy five minutes. One positron, Like a sitting

0:26:05.119 --> 0:26:08.160
<v Speaker 1>banana will shoot out a positron or does it get

0:26:08.160 --> 0:26:13.920
<v Speaker 1>caught by the other you know, banana electron banana on.

0:26:16.080 --> 0:26:17.920
<v Speaker 1>It depends. I guess where it gets produced. If it's

0:26:17.920 --> 0:26:20.159
<v Speaker 1>produced in the skin to the banana, it will shoot

0:26:20.160 --> 0:26:23.040
<v Speaker 1>out into the air. But of course positrons don't last

0:26:23.119 --> 0:26:26.400
<v Speaker 1>very long because they interact with electrons. But yeah, your

0:26:26.480 --> 0:26:29.320
<v Speaker 1>favored fruit, whether it's sitting on the table or you know,

0:26:29.680 --> 0:26:32.000
<v Speaker 1>in a high speed banana accelerator or whatever you do

0:26:32.040 --> 0:26:35.520
<v Speaker 1>with your bananas, produces about one positron every seventy five minutes.

0:26:35.560 --> 0:26:38.960
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't get stopped by the peel electrons electron. Yeah,

0:26:38.960 --> 0:26:40.800
<v Speaker 1>if it's produced in the center of the banana, then

0:26:40.800 --> 0:26:42.840
<v Speaker 1>it could. But if it's produced near the edge, and

0:26:42.840 --> 0:26:44.440
<v Speaker 1>then you could make it out of the banana into

0:26:44.480 --> 0:26:46.800
<v Speaker 1>the air. Well, maybe that's where I get my superpowers. Dan,

0:26:46.880 --> 0:26:53.040
<v Speaker 1>You get antimatter, you get that banana's proportional strength. Yeah,

0:26:53.200 --> 0:26:56.000
<v Speaker 1>there you go. I can make anyone slip and fall.

0:26:56.160 --> 0:26:59.920
<v Speaker 1>That's superpower. I can't make anyone uncomfortable with my ban

0:27:00.000 --> 0:27:02.720
<v Speaker 1>ant a chewing. All right, Well, let's just slide on

0:27:02.840 --> 0:27:08.000
<v Speaker 1>past that discussion. Yeah, alright, So antimatter is real. It

0:27:08.119 --> 0:27:10.520
<v Speaker 1>is a thing. It's all around this. In fact, you're

0:27:10.520 --> 0:27:14.000
<v Speaker 1>probably baild in antimatter even though you maybe didn't know

0:27:14.080 --> 0:27:17.199
<v Speaker 1>it um. And you can also like make it in

0:27:17.280 --> 0:27:20.359
<v Speaker 1>a lab, right, like a certain you guys have been

0:27:20.400 --> 0:27:24.840
<v Speaker 1>making anti protons and anti hydrogen for a while, like

0:27:25.080 --> 0:27:28.040
<v Speaker 1>you have an antimatter of factory there. Yeah, that's right,

0:27:28.440 --> 0:27:30.680
<v Speaker 1>And the reason is that we're curious about it. We're

0:27:30.680 --> 0:27:33.960
<v Speaker 1>curious about like how symmetric our matter and antimatter. You know,

0:27:34.040 --> 0:27:37.320
<v Speaker 1>For example, can you make an anti proton and pair

0:27:37.359 --> 0:27:40.760
<v Speaker 1>it with an anti electron to get anti hydrogen? Does

0:27:40.840 --> 0:27:44.080
<v Speaker 1>chemistry work for antimatter? You know? Can you get enough

0:27:44.119 --> 0:27:48.320
<v Speaker 1>of it to test its gravitational properties? We don't even

0:27:48.320 --> 0:27:52.240
<v Speaker 1>know if antimatter feels gravity the way matter does, or

0:27:52.520 --> 0:27:55.000
<v Speaker 1>or if it feels like anti gravity because you just

0:27:55.080 --> 0:27:58.040
<v Speaker 1>never made enough of it. Really, the equations don't tell

0:27:58.080 --> 0:28:00.440
<v Speaker 1>you whether it should have mass or anti mass. Yeah,

0:28:00.480 --> 0:28:03.439
<v Speaker 1>because it's really hard to measure the gravitational force on

0:28:03.440 --> 0:28:06.119
<v Speaker 1>a particle because it hardly has any mass. And in

0:28:06.200 --> 0:28:09.400
<v Speaker 1>the history of particle physics, we've made something like twenty

0:28:09.680 --> 0:28:14.560
<v Speaker 1>nanograms of anti matter ever total, and so it's pretty

0:28:14.560 --> 0:28:17.800
<v Speaker 1>hard to measure the gravitational effect of such a tiny scrap.

0:28:18.400 --> 0:28:23.080
<v Speaker 1>But you have made anti protons and anti hydrogen, which

0:28:23.119 --> 0:28:25.240
<v Speaker 1>is pretty cool, right. It's like a hydrogen, but the

0:28:25.359 --> 0:28:27.960
<v Speaker 1>complete opposite. Yeah, And as far as we can tell,

0:28:28.000 --> 0:28:30.600
<v Speaker 1>it works exactly the same way as a hydrogen atom.

0:28:31.000 --> 0:28:33.840
<v Speaker 1>So they get into a bound state, they can get excited,

0:28:34.000 --> 0:28:37.240
<v Speaker 1>they emit photons. It's exactly the same. So it's super

0:28:37.240 --> 0:28:40.600
<v Speaker 1>fascinating either to learn that they're different or to learn

0:28:40.680 --> 0:28:42.120
<v Speaker 1>that they're the same, you know, and it brings up

0:28:42.160 --> 0:28:46.440
<v Speaker 1>all sorts of interesting questions like why why is there antimatter?

0:28:46.800 --> 0:28:49.360
<v Speaker 1>It seems like such an interesting clue, Like why does

0:28:49.480 --> 0:28:52.320
<v Speaker 1>universe have this weird reflection? You know, it has all

0:28:52.360 --> 0:28:55.120
<v Speaker 1>these reflections. I love all these symmetries and particle physics,

0:28:55.200 --> 0:28:57.720
<v Speaker 1>but each one should tell us something about the universe.

0:28:57.760 --> 0:29:00.640
<v Speaker 1>They're a big, deep clue that says, here's something fastening

0:29:00.760 --> 0:29:03.000
<v Speaker 1>that's going on. We just don't know what it means, well,

0:29:03.040 --> 0:29:05.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, some people are just really contrarian, you know,

0:29:05.360 --> 0:29:08.520
<v Speaker 1>and to mabe, the universe is just just being anti

0:29:08.560 --> 0:29:11.320
<v Speaker 1>anti for no reason other than to just be anti.

0:29:12.680 --> 0:29:15.760
<v Speaker 1>But if it, But if antimatter exists, then why aren't

0:29:15.760 --> 0:29:18.520
<v Speaker 1>there other sort of reflections? You know, Why can't you

0:29:18.600 --> 0:29:21.280
<v Speaker 1>have all the same particles but with different spin. Oh

0:29:21.360 --> 0:29:26.320
<v Speaker 1>well that's supersymmetry, you know, why this reflection not other reflections? Anyway,

0:29:26.560 --> 0:29:29.000
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of stuff that makes me wonder do you

0:29:29.040 --> 0:29:31.680
<v Speaker 1>think it's these other mirror images exist? Do you think

0:29:31.720 --> 0:29:35.320
<v Speaker 1>they would have better names in physics, like actually good

0:29:35.320 --> 0:29:38.480
<v Speaker 1>ones because they're to be the opposite. Well, they can't

0:29:38.520 --> 0:29:44.160
<v Speaker 1>have much worse names. So there you go. All right,

0:29:44.240 --> 0:29:47.040
<v Speaker 1>Well it does exist. It's real. You can we can

0:29:47.080 --> 0:29:50.040
<v Speaker 1>make it in the lab. It's my banana makes it

0:29:50.080 --> 0:29:53.280
<v Speaker 1>on a daily basis. And there are still a lot

0:29:53.280 --> 0:29:56.240
<v Speaker 1>of open questions about anti matter. So now let's talk

0:29:56.280 --> 0:29:59.960
<v Speaker 1>about how it was discovered, because that's a pretty interest

0:30:00.000 --> 0:30:03.080
<v Speaker 1>seeing story as well, and what it could mean for

0:30:03.120 --> 0:30:05.640
<v Speaker 1>the future of the universe. But first, let's take another

0:30:05.680 --> 0:30:22.040
<v Speaker 1>quick break. Okay, Daniel, So how is antimatter discovered? Were

0:30:22.040 --> 0:30:26.720
<v Speaker 1>they not looking for it and found it that would

0:30:26.720 --> 0:30:29.360
<v Speaker 1>be a great story. No, and that matter is sort

0:30:29.360 --> 0:30:34.000
<v Speaker 1>of a theoretical triumph because it happened actually very similarly

0:30:34.120 --> 0:30:36.360
<v Speaker 1>to the joke you made earlier, or the comments you

0:30:36.400 --> 0:30:39.280
<v Speaker 1>made earlier about people sort of noticing a gap in

0:30:39.280 --> 0:30:43.400
<v Speaker 1>the equations. What happened was the Paul Drac who's famous

0:30:43.440 --> 0:30:47.400
<v Speaker 1>theorist of around the beginning of when quantum mechanics was

0:30:47.400 --> 0:30:50.440
<v Speaker 1>was being formed, he was taking the Shortinger equation, the

0:30:50.640 --> 0:30:53.160
<v Speaker 1>equation that describes the motion of particles, and he was

0:30:53.200 --> 0:30:56.200
<v Speaker 1>trying to make it work for really fast moving particles.

0:30:56.480 --> 0:30:59.280
<v Speaker 1>He was trying to fold in relativity and quantum mechanics,

0:30:59.280 --> 0:31:02.160
<v Speaker 1>which amos is very hard to do, but he was

0:31:02.200 --> 0:31:06.720
<v Speaker 1>able to actually unify um, quantum mechanics, and special relativity

0:31:06.960 --> 0:31:08.640
<v Speaker 1>the laws that tell you what happens when things move

0:31:08.720 --> 0:31:13.040
<v Speaker 1>really really fast. So he came up with Yeah, he

0:31:13.120 --> 0:31:15.320
<v Speaker 1>came up with a new equation. It's called the Dirac equation,

0:31:15.800 --> 0:31:18.480
<v Speaker 1>and it's like the relativistic version of the Shortinger equation.

0:31:18.680 --> 0:31:22.000
<v Speaker 1>Shortinger equation tells you what happens for quantum particles that

0:31:22.040 --> 0:31:25.040
<v Speaker 1>are not moving that fast. The direct equation tells you

0:31:25.240 --> 0:31:28.560
<v Speaker 1>what happens when quantum particles are moving fast enough that

0:31:28.640 --> 0:31:32.160
<v Speaker 1>relativity kicks in. So he had this awesome equation already

0:31:32.200 --> 0:31:35.520
<v Speaker 1>a triumph, right, and it turned out to be true. Right,

0:31:35.600 --> 0:31:39.280
<v Speaker 1>This theory is as far as you know now. Yeah,

0:31:39.480 --> 0:31:43.520
<v Speaker 1>and that's amazing, right, direct unified special relativity and quantum mechanics.

0:31:43.560 --> 0:31:48.040
<v Speaker 1>And remember we've never successfully unified quantum mechanics and general

0:31:48.080 --> 0:31:51.280
<v Speaker 1>relativity theory by like bending space. That's still like to

0:31:51.400 --> 0:31:53.960
<v Speaker 1>be done. So folks out there looking to make a

0:31:54.080 --> 0:31:56.400
<v Speaker 1>big impact on physics that's been an open problem for

0:31:56.440 --> 0:32:00.280
<v Speaker 1>a hundred years TVD to be discovered. That's right. But

0:32:00.760 --> 0:32:02.800
<v Speaker 1>then Derek looked at this equation. He's like, this is

0:32:02.800 --> 0:32:05.880
<v Speaker 1>something weird about this equation. He noticed that the equation

0:32:05.960 --> 0:32:09.200
<v Speaker 1>worked for a negatively charged particles like electrons, but it

0:32:09.200 --> 0:32:13.480
<v Speaker 1>would also work for positively charged particles. They thought, that's interesting.

0:32:13.680 --> 0:32:15.920
<v Speaker 1>Did did the equations have a pocket or like an

0:32:15.920 --> 0:32:18.280
<v Speaker 1>empty space for an anti electron? Or he just figured

0:32:18.320 --> 0:32:22.120
<v Speaker 1>out that this equation that we think describes the universe

0:32:22.320 --> 0:32:27.040
<v Speaker 1>could also work for something that looks like an anti electron. Yeah,

0:32:27.120 --> 0:32:29.920
<v Speaker 1>it's an equation with two solutions, just like you find

0:32:29.960 --> 0:32:33.040
<v Speaker 1>all the time and equations that have like squares in them,

0:32:33.080 --> 0:32:36.560
<v Speaker 1>like X squared equals nine, while there's a solution there, right,

0:32:36.800 --> 0:32:41.160
<v Speaker 1>X equals three, But there's another solution X equals minus three, right,

0:32:41.200 --> 0:32:45.840
<v Speaker 1>because minus three ties minus three is also plus nine. Yeah, exactly.

0:32:46.320 --> 0:32:50.040
<v Speaker 1>And so he noticed that his equation described electrons as

0:32:50.040 --> 0:32:52.800
<v Speaker 1>we know them, but it also described something else, something

0:32:52.840 --> 0:32:56.480
<v Speaker 1>we hadn't seen before, another particle with positive charge. And

0:32:56.520 --> 0:32:58.959
<v Speaker 1>it's for exactly that reason that there's a squared in

0:32:59.120 --> 0:33:02.920
<v Speaker 1>his equation, and it allows for you know, particles of

0:33:03.040 --> 0:33:06.760
<v Speaker 1>either charge to satisfy his equations. And so he predicted

0:33:06.800 --> 0:33:09.719
<v Speaker 1>that this would work for an anti electron. But did

0:33:09.800 --> 0:33:12.959
<v Speaker 1>he predicted for other anti matter particles or just just

0:33:13.040 --> 0:33:16.000
<v Speaker 1>for the anti electron? Oh? Yeah, the story gets exciting,

0:33:16.280 --> 0:33:18.840
<v Speaker 1>But first he started small. He's like, you know what,

0:33:19.160 --> 0:33:21.800
<v Speaker 1>I think this is real? And I wonder like what

0:33:21.920 --> 0:33:24.400
<v Speaker 1>went through his head there? What makes him think, Oh,

0:33:24.440 --> 0:33:27.920
<v Speaker 1>that's not just a mathematical oddity. I've discovered something about

0:33:27.960 --> 0:33:30.719
<v Speaker 1>the universe. Because a lot of times we have equations

0:33:30.720 --> 0:33:33.240
<v Speaker 1>that describe things and we just sort of toss out

0:33:33.280 --> 0:33:36.960
<v Speaker 1>solutions and say they're not physical, Like if you're talking about,

0:33:37.000 --> 0:33:38.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, how a ball moves through the air, you

0:33:38.960 --> 0:33:41.960
<v Speaker 1>have a parabola. And sometimes there are non physical solutions

0:33:41.960 --> 0:33:44.360
<v Speaker 1>to those equations, and you say, oh, those don't make

0:33:44.400 --> 0:33:46.680
<v Speaker 1>sense because they required the ball to move through the

0:33:46.680 --> 0:33:49.440
<v Speaker 1>ground or something. But he thought, no, this is real.

0:33:49.520 --> 0:33:51.800
<v Speaker 1>It's kind of like if you said that the number

0:33:51.840 --> 0:33:53.920
<v Speaker 1>of cookies that I have times a number of cookies

0:33:53.960 --> 0:33:56.720
<v Speaker 1>you have equals nine. You wouldn't say we both both

0:33:56.720 --> 0:34:00.360
<v Speaker 1>have minus three cookies. That wouldn't that want to be

0:34:00.360 --> 0:34:05.960
<v Speaker 1>a serious solution, because let's face it, we always have cookies. Yeah,

0:34:05.960 --> 0:34:09.040
<v Speaker 1>you impose a physical requirement there at least zero cookies. Right,

0:34:09.040 --> 0:34:11.799
<v Speaker 1>there's no such thing as a negative cookie. And but

0:34:11.920 --> 0:34:14.880
<v Speaker 1>Dirac was like, you know what, what if negative you

0:34:14.920 --> 0:34:18.080
<v Speaker 1>can count it as a negative. If I eat your cookies,

0:34:18.080 --> 0:34:21.160
<v Speaker 1>then maybe you have negative cookies. I don't know. I

0:34:21.160 --> 0:34:23.839
<v Speaker 1>would have a very negative reaction. Sure. I think there's

0:34:23.840 --> 0:34:26.960
<v Speaker 1>probably a whole course in philosophy on theory of negative cookies,

0:34:27.480 --> 0:34:32.520
<v Speaker 1>the ethical ramifications of less than zero cookies. Yeah, anti

0:34:32.600 --> 0:34:37.720
<v Speaker 1>ethics or anti pastry. But he predicted it. He was balls,

0:34:37.719 --> 0:34:39.719
<v Speaker 1>and he said, I believe in myself, I believe in

0:34:39.760 --> 0:34:41.960
<v Speaker 1>my equation. I think this thing is real. So he

0:34:42.000 --> 0:34:47.360
<v Speaker 1>predicted his way before iPhones or the internet. Yeah, he

0:34:47.360 --> 0:34:49.839
<v Speaker 1>couldn't have just googled for it or asked Siri if

0:34:49.840 --> 0:34:52.719
<v Speaker 1>this is real. He made a prediction. And he's sort

0:34:52.760 --> 0:34:54.960
<v Speaker 1>of famous for being, you know, a bit of an

0:34:54.960 --> 0:34:57.239
<v Speaker 1>odd guy. You know, he probably fit in well on

0:34:57.280 --> 0:35:00.000
<v Speaker 1>the Big Bang theory. It had a lot of self confidence,

0:35:00.080 --> 0:35:02.319
<v Speaker 1>but maybe not a lot of social skills. He made

0:35:02.320 --> 0:35:05.360
<v Speaker 1>the claim that these equations work for an anti electron,

0:35:05.520 --> 0:35:10.320
<v Speaker 1>so therefore there must be an anti electron. Is that is? That?

0:35:10.440 --> 0:35:12.640
<v Speaker 1>Was that his big leap there? That was his big leap.

0:35:12.640 --> 0:35:14.920
<v Speaker 1>He says, I've discovered this equation, and the equation is

0:35:14.960 --> 0:35:18.560
<v Speaker 1>fundamental to the universe and it describes something happening that

0:35:18.600 --> 0:35:21.719
<v Speaker 1>we haven't seen. So I think it's happens right, even

0:35:21.760 --> 0:35:23.479
<v Speaker 1>though we haven't we haven't seen it because we haven't

0:35:23.520 --> 0:35:26.520
<v Speaker 1>looked for it. This equation allows for it to happen.

0:35:26.560 --> 0:35:28.480
<v Speaker 1>So let's go see if it does happen. Was that

0:35:28.520 --> 0:35:31.480
<v Speaker 1>a shift in physics as well? You know, people thinking

0:35:31.880 --> 0:35:35.080
<v Speaker 1>that well, if the if the math predicts it, then

0:35:35.120 --> 0:35:37.439
<v Speaker 1>it must be real. You know, like that's a big

0:35:37.520 --> 0:35:39.640
<v Speaker 1>leap to think about that. It's a big leap. It

0:35:39.680 --> 0:35:42.240
<v Speaker 1>takes a lot of ego but it was the first

0:35:42.280 --> 0:35:45.439
<v Speaker 1>time a particle had been predicted. Yeah. Before that, every

0:35:45.440 --> 0:35:49.719
<v Speaker 1>particle discovered had been discovered first and then explained. It's like, oh,

0:35:49.760 --> 0:35:52.080
<v Speaker 1>look who we found How does that make sense? Let's

0:35:52.120 --> 0:35:55.520
<v Speaker 1>try to stitch together a theory that that accommodates it.

0:35:55.520 --> 0:35:57.319
<v Speaker 1>It's like in baseball, it's like calling your shot run

0:35:57.360 --> 0:35:58.919
<v Speaker 1>than just hitting a home run. You're like, I'm gonna

0:35:58.960 --> 0:36:03.440
<v Speaker 1>hit a home run and it's the land right over there. Well,

0:36:03.480 --> 0:36:05.400
<v Speaker 1>I guess he had a history. Maybe he had up

0:36:05.440 --> 0:36:07.480
<v Speaker 1>to that point, there was a history where they had

0:36:07.520 --> 0:36:10.680
<v Speaker 1>discovered particles and then they found out the math fits it.

0:36:10.880 --> 0:36:13.319
<v Speaker 1>So then this, in this case, the math fitted and

0:36:13.360 --> 0:36:15.920
<v Speaker 1>so he probably thought, well then it must exist. Yeah,

0:36:16.000 --> 0:36:18.399
<v Speaker 1>And it didn't take long for him to be proved. Right.

0:36:18.560 --> 0:36:21.840
<v Speaker 1>He was a babe ruth of physics. Yeah, and he

0:36:21.920 --> 0:36:24.480
<v Speaker 1>gets better. So it was just a few years later

0:36:24.520 --> 0:36:27.600
<v Speaker 1>a guy at cal Tech named Carl Anderson. He actually

0:36:27.640 --> 0:36:30.479
<v Speaker 1>found the first positron, and like we were talking about,

0:36:30.520 --> 0:36:32.919
<v Speaker 1>he found it in cosmic rays. He just saw one

0:36:33.239 --> 0:36:35.440
<v Speaker 1>flying through the air. And what made him think it

0:36:35.560 --> 0:36:38.360
<v Speaker 1>was a positron or an anti electron? Was he looking

0:36:38.360 --> 0:36:41.439
<v Speaker 1>for it? Or I guess maybe his setup could only

0:36:41.480 --> 0:36:44.279
<v Speaker 1>work for an anti electron. No, he was looking just

0:36:44.320 --> 0:36:47.120
<v Speaker 1>to study cosmic rays, which were fairly new discovery at

0:36:47.120 --> 0:36:49.279
<v Speaker 1>the time. The whole idea that there were these particles

0:36:49.320 --> 0:36:51.799
<v Speaker 1>being rained on us from the upper atmosphere was sort

0:36:51.800 --> 0:36:54.240
<v Speaker 1>of new, and he was using a pretty cool device.

0:36:54.280 --> 0:36:57.280
<v Speaker 1>At the time, the first cosmic rays were discovered basically

0:36:57.320 --> 0:37:00.319
<v Speaker 1>by huge cubic blocks of film that they had to

0:37:00.360 --> 0:37:03.640
<v Speaker 1>slice up and analyze later. But he wanted some real time.

0:37:03.680 --> 0:37:05.640
<v Speaker 1>He wanted to see these things in real time, so

0:37:05.680 --> 0:37:07.960
<v Speaker 1>he used this thing called the cloud chamber, which is

0:37:07.960 --> 0:37:11.080
<v Speaker 1>basically a box of glass that you can see into

0:37:11.200 --> 0:37:13.200
<v Speaker 1>and then you fill it with air which is supersaturated

0:37:13.239 --> 0:37:15.640
<v Speaker 1>with water, and when a particle goes through it that

0:37:15.719 --> 0:37:19.680
<v Speaker 1>has a charge, it will cause droplets along its path,

0:37:19.840 --> 0:37:22.120
<v Speaker 1>and so you see are these like little drops of

0:37:22.120 --> 0:37:24.680
<v Speaker 1>water appear as a particle flies through it. You can

0:37:24.680 --> 0:37:27.120
<v Speaker 1>actually build the cloud chamber in your garage. Yeah. It

0:37:27.440 --> 0:37:30.480
<v Speaker 1>creates like a trail of bubbles as it goes through.

0:37:31.040 --> 0:37:33.280
<v Speaker 1>Not bubbles, there's there's something else called the bubble chamber.

0:37:33.440 --> 0:37:37.600
<v Speaker 1>This creates a trail of water droplets and you can

0:37:37.600 --> 0:37:38.960
<v Speaker 1>see them, and they have them in a lot of

0:37:39.000 --> 0:37:41.960
<v Speaker 1>science museums you can see like muans flying through them,

0:37:42.040 --> 0:37:44.399
<v Speaker 1>and so he had seen muans and people have seen

0:37:44.440 --> 0:37:47.480
<v Speaker 1>electrons and stuff like this. But then he put it

0:37:47.520 --> 0:37:50.360
<v Speaker 1>in a magnetic field, and the magnetic field bends the

0:37:50.360 --> 0:37:53.480
<v Speaker 1>path of this particle, and the magnetic field will bend

0:37:53.600 --> 0:37:57.160
<v Speaker 1>a positive particle differently than it bends a negative particle

0:37:57.440 --> 0:38:00.319
<v Speaker 1>cool and so that this was just a few years

0:38:00.360 --> 0:38:03.440
<v Speaker 1>after direct So he did he know about directs prediction

0:38:03.960 --> 0:38:07.040
<v Speaker 1>or did he discover it kind of independently. Now, he

0:38:07.080 --> 0:38:09.800
<v Speaker 1>definitely knew about directs prediction. It was an idea that

0:38:09.880 --> 0:38:11.680
<v Speaker 1>was out there, so it helped him sort of interpret

0:38:11.719 --> 0:38:14.160
<v Speaker 1>his data. And what he saw was, of course, a

0:38:14.200 --> 0:38:16.680
<v Speaker 1>bunch of electrons. Electrons are much more common in the

0:38:16.719 --> 0:38:19.920
<v Speaker 1>atmosphere than positrons. But then he saw this one track,

0:38:20.239 --> 0:38:23.160
<v Speaker 1>this track that curved the wrong way, and he said,

0:38:23.440 --> 0:38:26.520
<v Speaker 1>what's that? You know? And he could tell the mass

0:38:26.560 --> 0:38:29.080
<v Speaker 1>of the particle by how much it curved, and you

0:38:29.080 --> 0:38:31.239
<v Speaker 1>could tell the charge of it by the direction of

0:38:31.280 --> 0:38:34.000
<v Speaker 1>its curve. So he knew, for example, it wasn't a proton,

0:38:34.200 --> 0:38:37.240
<v Speaker 1>because the proton is much heavier and would have curved less.

0:38:37.560 --> 0:38:41.040
<v Speaker 1>So curved just like an electron except the other way,

0:38:41.040 --> 0:38:45.040
<v Speaker 1>except the direction. Yes, And this is amazing to me

0:38:45.080 --> 0:38:48.200
<v Speaker 1>because these days, to discover something, you don't just need

0:38:48.239 --> 0:38:50.400
<v Speaker 1>one example. You can't be like, hey, look here's the

0:38:50.480 --> 0:38:53.440
<v Speaker 1>Higgs boson. We found it, and here's the picture of it.

0:38:53.960 --> 0:38:57.680
<v Speaker 1>You know, um, we need like five examples or something

0:38:57.760 --> 0:39:01.880
<v Speaker 1>to show statistically that it really exists. Really, he claimed

0:39:01.880 --> 0:39:05.759
<v Speaker 1>his discovery with and equals one data points and equals one.

0:39:05.760 --> 0:39:08.719
<v Speaker 1>It was so conclusive. Nothing we knew of could make

0:39:08.760 --> 0:39:11.200
<v Speaker 1>that data. He didn't even wait to get another one. No,

0:39:11.320 --> 0:39:13.759
<v Speaker 1>he didn't even wait to get another one. And you

0:39:13.800 --> 0:39:16.240
<v Speaker 1>can see like that is famous data. You can google

0:39:16.239 --> 0:39:19.200
<v Speaker 1>for it and see like his original data that proved

0:39:19.200 --> 0:39:22.239
<v Speaker 1>the discovery of the positive. Sure he didn't he didn't

0:39:22.400 --> 0:39:24.040
<v Speaker 1>get at least two. He didn't wait a little bit

0:39:24.080 --> 0:39:26.919
<v Speaker 1>and got another one. Maybe he got some backup data,

0:39:27.320 --> 0:39:30.480
<v Speaker 1>but you know that's all he needed. That that convinced everybody.

0:39:30.600 --> 0:39:36.239
<v Speaker 1>I'm still convinced by one image. Yeah, and um, and

0:39:36.280 --> 0:39:39.520
<v Speaker 1>so he discovered that was ninety two. And then the

0:39:39.560 --> 0:39:44.480
<v Speaker 1>next year Dirac wins the Nobel Prize for predicting antimatter.

0:39:44.760 --> 0:39:47.560
<v Speaker 1>Did Carl and Anderson also get it? Or just the

0:39:48.080 --> 0:39:50.200
<v Speaker 1>just the rack in nineteen thirty three, but then Anderson

0:39:50.239 --> 0:39:53.520
<v Speaker 1>wanted three years later sort of in a combined Nobel

0:39:53.600 --> 0:39:56.640
<v Speaker 1>Prize for cosmic rade discoveries. But my favorite bit of

0:39:56.680 --> 0:39:58.560
<v Speaker 1>this story is that Dirac, you know, he was a

0:39:58.560 --> 0:40:01.360
<v Speaker 1>heavy guy, and he made of this bold prediction and

0:40:01.360 --> 0:40:04.120
<v Speaker 1>then it actually had come true. So then you know

0:40:04.120 --> 0:40:06.600
<v Speaker 1>he like called his shot at like babe Ruth. So

0:40:06.640 --> 0:40:09.279
<v Speaker 1>then in his acceptance speech where he's like, you know,

0:40:09.360 --> 0:40:12.160
<v Speaker 1>at the Nobel Prize ceremony getting the Nobel Prize from

0:40:12.160 --> 0:40:15.120
<v Speaker 1>the King of Sweden, in that speech he predicts another particle.

0:40:15.160 --> 0:40:20.640
<v Speaker 1>He like doubles down. He's like, I predict a million

0:40:20.680 --> 0:40:27.800
<v Speaker 1>dollars in my bank account tomorrow. He predicted the anti proton.

0:40:27.920 --> 0:40:31.120
<v Speaker 1>He was like, well, if the electron has an anti particle,

0:40:31.280 --> 0:40:34.520
<v Speaker 1>why not the proton? So he predicted it. Oh wow.

0:40:34.640 --> 0:40:36.600
<v Speaker 1>And then when he got the Nobel price for that one,

0:40:36.960 --> 0:40:40.000
<v Speaker 1>did he also make another prediction in the next speech, like,

0:40:40.040 --> 0:40:43.200
<v Speaker 1>how when did you stop? It's still going on? Actually,

0:40:44.160 --> 0:40:48.200
<v Speaker 1>I see he's still making predictions. He's like, and the

0:40:48.239 --> 0:40:51.799
<v Speaker 1>next election will be won by Hey, doubling down works

0:40:51.800 --> 0:40:53.440
<v Speaker 1>for you, right, you just keep doubling down. And the

0:40:53.520 --> 0:40:58.719
<v Speaker 1>exponentially you get more and more Nobel prizes. Yeah, yeah,

0:40:58.920 --> 0:41:02.799
<v Speaker 1>alright cool. So that's how the antimatter, the first antimatter

0:41:02.880 --> 0:41:06.560
<v Speaker 1>particle was discovered, and since then we've we've seen antimatter

0:41:06.640 --> 0:41:09.759
<v Speaker 1>particles all over the place and for all kinds of

0:41:09.800 --> 0:41:13.040
<v Speaker 1>particles to write, that's right. And these days in particle

0:41:13.120 --> 0:41:17.360
<v Speaker 1>collisions we can very easily make anti electrons, which are positrons,

0:41:17.360 --> 0:41:21.720
<v Speaker 1>and anti muons, and we've seen antiquarks and all sorts

0:41:21.719 --> 0:41:25.200
<v Speaker 1>of crazy stuff. There are some antiparticles we haven't seen yet.

0:41:25.360 --> 0:41:28.920
<v Speaker 1>Oh really, they're still hiding or there's still we just

0:41:28.960 --> 0:41:32.120
<v Speaker 1>haven't bothered. Well, no, there's some some that are still hiding.

0:41:32.160 --> 0:41:36.359
<v Speaker 1>For example, anti neutrinos. Like we know neutrinos are a thing.

0:41:36.600 --> 0:41:39.799
<v Speaker 1>What we don't know is if there are anti neutrinos.

0:41:39.840 --> 0:41:41.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean we talk about it, but we don't really

0:41:41.520 --> 0:41:44.400
<v Speaker 1>know if anti neutrinos are just the same thing as

0:41:44.440 --> 0:41:48.160
<v Speaker 1>neutrinos because they have no electric charge. Yeah, how can

0:41:48.200 --> 0:41:51.880
<v Speaker 1>you be anti nothing? Yeah? Well, for example, the photon

0:41:52.560 --> 0:41:55.040
<v Speaker 1>is its own antiparticle, or you could say it doesn't

0:41:55.080 --> 0:41:57.719
<v Speaker 1>have an antiparticle. So we don't know if neutrinos are

0:41:57.719 --> 0:42:01.400
<v Speaker 1>in that category of particles that don't would have antiparticles,

0:42:01.520 --> 0:42:03.640
<v Speaker 1>or if they're in the category of particles like electrons

0:42:03.680 --> 0:42:08.200
<v Speaker 1>and do have antiparticles, like asking who who is the

0:42:08.239 --> 0:42:12.880
<v Speaker 1>anti version of Switzerland and sucerand is neutral? So nobody

0:42:12.920 --> 0:42:15.919
<v Speaker 1>and everybody precisely. So people are trying to figure out

0:42:16.120 --> 0:42:20.600
<v Speaker 1>do neutrinos have antiparticles or are they just themselves? Um,

0:42:20.760 --> 0:42:23.160
<v Speaker 1>all sorts of stuff, And then people are doing more

0:42:23.200 --> 0:42:25.880
<v Speaker 1>and more experiments to make antimatter and try to study

0:42:25.880 --> 0:42:28.520
<v Speaker 1>its chemical properties. We'd love to see, like more than

0:42:28.600 --> 0:42:31.360
<v Speaker 1>just anti hydrogen. We'd love to see you know, anti

0:42:31.440 --> 0:42:33.919
<v Speaker 1>water and all sorts of crazy stuff. But I guess

0:42:33.960 --> 0:42:36.920
<v Speaker 1>the point is that it does exist, and that it

0:42:37.080 --> 0:42:40.920
<v Speaker 1>is something that was predicted by the physics, by the

0:42:40.920 --> 0:42:45.080
<v Speaker 1>equations first, and then we went out and found it,

0:42:45.120 --> 0:42:48.520
<v Speaker 1>and now there's in controvertible proof that it does exist,

0:42:48.719 --> 0:42:52.120
<v Speaker 1>that antimatter can exist, does exist, even if we don't

0:42:52.160 --> 0:42:55.080
<v Speaker 1>know exactly where it is in the universe. That's right.

0:42:55.360 --> 0:42:57.600
<v Speaker 1>Even though it's been featured in the Dan Brown novel,

0:42:57.880 --> 0:43:00.800
<v Speaker 1>it is really out there, and it's a triumph in

0:43:00.840 --> 0:43:03.840
<v Speaker 1>the theoretical physics to sort of notice these patterns in

0:43:03.880 --> 0:43:07.280
<v Speaker 1>the universe and assume that the universe might follow those patterns,

0:43:07.520 --> 0:43:10.040
<v Speaker 1>right to say, we think the universe makes sense, and

0:43:10.080 --> 0:43:12.200
<v Speaker 1>if we can figure out the rules that describe it,

0:43:12.400 --> 0:43:14.840
<v Speaker 1>then maybe we can use that to predict things in

0:43:14.880 --> 0:43:17.760
<v Speaker 1>the universe we've never even seen. Right, what a crazy

0:43:17.800 --> 0:43:21.600
<v Speaker 1>step forward. Yep, it's not a conspiracy theory. It's a

0:43:21.640 --> 0:43:28.719
<v Speaker 1>conspiracy fact. We have a picture of it from that

0:43:28.880 --> 0:43:31.560
<v Speaker 1>says that it's true, so it must be true. It's

0:43:31.560 --> 0:43:33.880
<v Speaker 1>out there, it's in you, it's in me, it's in

0:43:33.920 --> 0:43:37.160
<v Speaker 1>jogees bananas, So get used to it, folks. All right, Well,

0:43:37.160 --> 0:43:39.400
<v Speaker 1>we hope you enjoyed that and got to learn a

0:43:39.400 --> 0:43:42.560
<v Speaker 1>little bit more about the anti universe out there, the

0:43:42.640 --> 0:43:46.480
<v Speaker 1>antihistory of physics, or the physics of antihistory, or the

0:43:46.640 --> 0:43:49.600
<v Speaker 1>history of anti physics. Well, you've definitely convinced me. Daniel

0:43:49.640 --> 0:43:54.839
<v Speaker 1>am definitely pro anti matter. Now, thanks everyone for tuning in.

0:44:02.600 --> 0:44:04.960
<v Speaker 1>Before you still have a question after listening to all

0:44:04.960 --> 0:44:08.200
<v Speaker 1>these explanations, please drop us the line. We'd love to

0:44:08.239 --> 0:44:10.640
<v Speaker 1>hear from you. You can find us on Facebook, Twitter,

0:44:10.719 --> 0:44:14.400
<v Speaker 1>and Instagram at Daniel and Jorge that's one word, or

0:44:14.520 --> 0:44:18.440
<v Speaker 1>email us at Feedback at Daniel and Jorge dot com.

0:44:18.480 --> 0:44:21.280
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening and remember that Daniel and Jorge Explain

0:44:21.360 --> 0:44:24.200
<v Speaker 1>the Universe is a production of I heart Radio. For

0:44:24.360 --> 0:44:27.279
<v Speaker 1>more podcast from my heart Radio, visit the i heart

0:44:27.360 --> 0:44:30.960
<v Speaker 1>Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your

0:44:31.040 --> 0:44:31.760
<v Speaker 1>favorite shows.