WEBVTT - Can Open-Source Semiconductors Upend the Chip Industry?

0:00:10.760 --> 0:00:14.240
<v Speaker 1>Hello, and welcome to another episode of the Odd Thoughts Podcast.

0:00:14.360 --> 0:00:18.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm Chacy Alloway and I'm Joe Wisental. So Joe, uh,

0:00:18.960 --> 0:00:23.600
<v Speaker 1>we just can't get away from semiconductors. You know. I

0:00:23.640 --> 0:00:26.319
<v Speaker 1>thought we were going to end it with our five

0:00:26.360 --> 0:00:30.480
<v Speaker 1>episodes series, but the people are clamoring for more chips. Tracy.

0:00:30.560 --> 0:00:32.800
<v Speaker 1>That's just a fact I can't get can't get away

0:00:32.800 --> 0:00:34.800
<v Speaker 1>from it. Yeah, It's one of those like just when

0:00:34.800 --> 0:00:36.680
<v Speaker 1>you thought you were out, they pull you back in

0:00:37.000 --> 0:00:40.920
<v Speaker 1>kind of things. Okay, So, by popular request, this is

0:00:40.960 --> 0:00:44.640
<v Speaker 1>a bonus episode to our semiconductor series. It's going to

0:00:44.680 --> 0:00:46.960
<v Speaker 1>be a little bit different to the other ones because

0:00:46.960 --> 0:00:51.280
<v Speaker 1>we're going to be talking about a new technology, a

0:00:51.400 --> 0:00:53.640
<v Speaker 1>new sort of how do I explain this? Well, I

0:00:53.640 --> 0:00:57.960
<v Speaker 1>guess it's an open source hardware technology that could have

0:00:58.040 --> 0:01:01.240
<v Speaker 1>a big impact on the chips industry and the way

0:01:01.280 --> 0:01:04.280
<v Speaker 1>things have traditionally been done. Right. So a lot of

0:01:04.280 --> 0:01:07.560
<v Speaker 1>our discussion has sort of talked about a few like

0:01:07.720 --> 0:01:11.360
<v Speaker 1>basic business models. I mean, we've talked about Intel and

0:01:11.400 --> 0:01:15.279
<v Speaker 1>the sort of integrated UM chip design and fab model

0:01:15.480 --> 0:01:19.680
<v Speaker 1>boundary versus fab and then the fabless semiconductor companies which

0:01:19.720 --> 0:01:24.040
<v Speaker 1>have given rise to the contract manufacturer Tawan Semi, which

0:01:24.040 --> 0:01:26.560
<v Speaker 1>is sort of the ultimate fab. So we've sort of like,

0:01:26.760 --> 0:01:29.520
<v Speaker 1>um got this sort of like broad contours of the industry,

0:01:29.600 --> 0:01:32.600
<v Speaker 1>but in terms of like interesting new technologies or different

0:01:32.640 --> 0:01:35.600
<v Speaker 1>directions or totally different models of where how things could go,

0:01:36.160 --> 0:01:41.160
<v Speaker 1>still more to be discovered. Yeah, that's exactly right. So, uh,

0:01:41.400 --> 0:01:43.840
<v Speaker 1>someone told us that we had to talk to this

0:01:43.959 --> 0:01:47.000
<v Speaker 1>particular company because they were one of the leaders in

0:01:47.160 --> 0:01:52.840
<v Speaker 1>trying to commercialize this open source hardware idea. It's called

0:01:53.120 --> 0:01:56.680
<v Speaker 1>Risk five. It's a let me see if I can

0:01:56.720 --> 0:01:59.760
<v Speaker 1>pull it up, it's R I S C and then

0:02:00.200 --> 0:02:04.440
<v Speaker 1>five Risk five. So what we're gonna do is actually

0:02:04.520 --> 0:02:07.760
<v Speaker 1>learn about what the technology is and then dive in

0:02:07.760 --> 0:02:10.440
<v Speaker 1>a little bit to what it might mean for existing

0:02:10.480 --> 0:02:14.880
<v Speaker 1>chip makers and how the whole ecosystem of semiconductors actually works.

0:02:16.240 --> 0:02:18.200
<v Speaker 1>I can't wait. I don't know anything about any of

0:02:18.240 --> 0:02:21.560
<v Speaker 1>this stuff, so I just want to learn more. Yeah, okay,

0:02:21.600 --> 0:02:24.839
<v Speaker 1>we're all learning together. So without further ado, let's bring

0:02:24.840 --> 0:02:28.440
<v Speaker 1>on Chris Latner. He's the president of product and engineering

0:02:28.720 --> 0:02:33.200
<v Speaker 1>over at SCI five. He's also a long time tech

0:02:33.240 --> 0:02:35.960
<v Speaker 1>guy and quite famous in the industry for reasons that

0:02:36.040 --> 0:02:40.880
<v Speaker 1>we will get in. So Chris, welcome to our thoughts. Hey,

0:02:40.960 --> 0:02:42.519
<v Speaker 1>thank you for having me. I'm excited to be here.

0:02:43.120 --> 0:02:45.919
<v Speaker 1>Could you could you maybe give us a snapshot the

0:02:46.280 --> 0:02:52.040
<v Speaker 1>elevator pitch for risk five before we begin. Sure sounds great.

0:02:52.200 --> 0:02:54.680
<v Speaker 1>Let's start with what what is risk five? So when

0:02:54.720 --> 0:02:57.680
<v Speaker 1>you start talking about these companies, companies like Intel or

0:02:57.919 --> 0:03:01.799
<v Speaker 1>Arm or m D things like this, they generally make processors,

0:03:02.120 --> 0:03:04.799
<v Speaker 1>and so the processor in your computer it's jobs to

0:03:04.840 --> 0:03:08.120
<v Speaker 1>run software. And there's this complicated dance that happens between

0:03:08.120 --> 0:03:11.160
<v Speaker 1>the software and the hardware and the thing that mediates that.

0:03:11.280 --> 0:03:13.480
<v Speaker 1>The thing that lives in between these two worlds is

0:03:13.520 --> 0:03:17.000
<v Speaker 1>a thing called an instruction set. That instruction set is

0:03:17.040 --> 0:03:21.240
<v Speaker 1>often proprietor and so um. With Intel, for example, they'll

0:03:21.280 --> 0:03:24.520
<v Speaker 1>use an instruction set called x A D six. ARM

0:03:24.639 --> 0:03:27.320
<v Speaker 1>has a set of instruction sets that they named after themselves.

0:03:27.400 --> 0:03:29.720
<v Speaker 1>They have the ARM Instruction Set UM. There are many,

0:03:29.880 --> 0:03:31.760
<v Speaker 1>many of these things that have existed over the years.

0:03:32.040 --> 0:03:36.600
<v Speaker 1>A company called MIPS remember, a company may remember ages

0:03:36.640 --> 0:03:39.600
<v Speaker 1>ago called Sun had an instruction set called Spark, and

0:03:39.640 --> 0:03:42.840
<v Speaker 1>many of these things existed in their designed for different

0:03:42.920 --> 0:03:46.360
<v Speaker 1>different configurations. Now these have all worked and these have

0:03:46.400 --> 0:03:48.000
<v Speaker 1>been a good thing, and obviously we have a lot

0:03:48.000 --> 0:03:51.960
<v Speaker 1>of successful computers today. Um, but there's a problem. The

0:03:52.040 --> 0:03:54.840
<v Speaker 1>problem is that the software and the hardware lasts longer

0:03:54.880 --> 0:03:58.400
<v Speaker 1>than the companies do sometimes and so MIPS for examples,

0:03:58.440 --> 0:04:02.440
<v Speaker 1>in bankruptcy these days, Sun kind of went away and

0:04:02.480 --> 0:04:06.320
<v Speaker 1>Spark is in a different world. And so one of

0:04:06.360 --> 0:04:08.720
<v Speaker 1>the challenges that you end up having as a device

0:04:08.800 --> 0:04:12.560
<v Speaker 1>manufacturer as a software provider is that you need something

0:04:12.600 --> 0:04:16.760
<v Speaker 1>that will survive. And you know, companies in general go

0:04:16.839 --> 0:04:20.000
<v Speaker 1>through changes and um, you know, as an industry, it's

0:04:20.040 --> 0:04:23.040
<v Speaker 1>always evolving. It's a fast paced world. Now there's another

0:04:23.120 --> 0:04:26.320
<v Speaker 1>challenge with this, which is also when you have a

0:04:26.320 --> 0:04:30.040
<v Speaker 1>company that's tied to a specific construction set that they create,

0:04:31.160 --> 0:04:33.640
<v Speaker 1>you only have a single provider. This can sometimes be

0:04:33.720 --> 0:04:37.640
<v Speaker 1>limiting if you're building a serious advices around one company's technology,

0:04:37.960 --> 0:04:40.520
<v Speaker 1>both if they go away, but also you don't have

0:04:40.560 --> 0:04:44.520
<v Speaker 1>as much market pressure pushing them to innovate and pushing

0:04:44.560 --> 0:04:48.120
<v Speaker 1>them to you know, have reasonable charges and rates and

0:04:48.160 --> 0:04:50.960
<v Speaker 1>things like this. So RISK five is a different approach

0:04:50.960 --> 0:04:54.520
<v Speaker 1>to this. Instead of saying it's a proprietary interface between

0:04:54.600 --> 0:04:57.800
<v Speaker 1>hardware and software, Risk five is an open standard and

0:04:57.880 --> 0:04:59.400
<v Speaker 1>so it's you can think of it as an open

0:04:59.440 --> 0:05:03.760
<v Speaker 1>source kind of instruction set which allows many different implementations

0:05:03.800 --> 0:05:07.080
<v Speaker 1>of hardware to work with all the software. And so

0:05:07.240 --> 0:05:08.960
<v Speaker 1>in this in this in this vein you can see

0:05:09.000 --> 0:05:11.760
<v Speaker 1>to something like t c P i P, which is

0:05:11.760 --> 0:05:14.359
<v Speaker 1>an open standard for networking, or you could see this LINUX,

0:05:14.360 --> 0:05:18.279
<v Speaker 1>which is an open standard for for software UM in

0:05:18.320 --> 0:05:21.240
<v Speaker 1>the unex world and things like this. And so that's

0:05:21.240 --> 0:05:23.920
<v Speaker 1>really what RISK five is is it's an old idea

0:05:24.000 --> 0:05:26.920
<v Speaker 1>about this interface between hardware and software. But the new

0:05:26.960 --> 0:05:30.120
<v Speaker 1>thing about it is that it's uh an open standard

0:05:30.240 --> 0:05:32.400
<v Speaker 1>and it also has a fresh new design that really

0:05:32.480 --> 0:05:34.800
<v Speaker 1>learns from what has happened in the industry and it's

0:05:34.839 --> 0:05:39.360
<v Speaker 1>just technically better in most ways. So just to be clear,

0:05:39.800 --> 0:05:45.320
<v Speaker 1>your company SCI five, is it manufacturing chips or is

0:05:45.360 --> 0:05:50.839
<v Speaker 1>it just creating this software layer from which others could

0:05:50.960 --> 0:05:56.279
<v Speaker 1>theoretically then build ships. Great question. So, if if I

0:05:56.320 --> 0:05:59.840
<v Speaker 1>look backwards, Risk five started started at the University of Berkeley,

0:06:00.120 --> 0:06:02.719
<v Speaker 1>and so it's about ten years old. It started in

0:06:02.760 --> 0:06:05.960
<v Speaker 1>a research lab, and you know, initially they were just

0:06:06.040 --> 0:06:09.719
<v Speaker 1>building an instruction set to support academic research, support some

0:06:09.760 --> 0:06:12.919
<v Speaker 1>of the projects that they're interested in. And that that

0:06:13.440 --> 0:06:17.240
<v Speaker 1>became a movement where a lot of people agreed that

0:06:17.279 --> 0:06:20.719
<v Speaker 1>they needed a standardized system and that allowed people to

0:06:20.760 --> 0:06:24.040
<v Speaker 1>do hardware research without having to do all the software work.

0:06:24.320 --> 0:06:27.279
<v Speaker 1>Really was it was enabling new kinds of innovation coming

0:06:27.279 --> 0:06:30.760
<v Speaker 1>out of the academic world. The founders of Risk five

0:06:31.520 --> 0:06:34.520
<v Speaker 1>all came from that research lab in Berkeley and five

0:06:34.600 --> 0:06:36.520
<v Speaker 1>years later decided to start a new company, and that

0:06:36.560 --> 0:06:40.040
<v Speaker 1>company is called SCI five. So that's where that's where

0:06:40.040 --> 0:06:43.240
<v Speaker 1>we We now are leading the Risk five revolution with

0:06:43.360 --> 0:06:46.320
<v Speaker 1>the founders of Risk five, and we're building a new company,

0:06:46.360 --> 0:06:49.479
<v Speaker 1>but we're also building and defining and driving much of

0:06:49.520 --> 0:06:54.400
<v Speaker 1>the technology the powers this open cross ecosystem standard that

0:06:54.600 --> 0:06:57.440
<v Speaker 1>Risk five is, and so SCI five as a company,

0:06:57.520 --> 0:07:01.240
<v Speaker 1>we build Risk five implementations. And so you can think

0:07:01.279 --> 0:07:03.720
<v Speaker 1>of as an analogy um T c P i P

0:07:03.880 --> 0:07:08.000
<v Speaker 1>is an open standard for networking, but Cisco builds routers, right,

0:07:08.400 --> 0:07:11.760
<v Speaker 1>and so we yeah, we're we're building implementations of Risk

0:07:11.840 --> 0:07:15.320
<v Speaker 1>five and so uh we are the best place to

0:07:15.400 --> 0:07:18.200
<v Speaker 1>go to if you want to build a product around

0:07:18.320 --> 0:07:20.680
<v Speaker 1>Risk five technology. And we have a wide range of

0:07:20.680 --> 0:07:25.800
<v Speaker 1>different implementations with different performance points, size area, power trade offs,

0:07:25.800 --> 0:07:28.680
<v Speaker 1>things like this could you maybe give us a little

0:07:28.720 --> 0:07:31.400
<v Speaker 1>bit of your background, So I teased it in the intro,

0:07:31.600 --> 0:07:34.360
<v Speaker 1>But you are very well known within the tech and

0:07:34.880 --> 0:07:38.400
<v Speaker 1>computer world, most notably well you might debate this, but

0:07:38.840 --> 0:07:42.000
<v Speaker 1>for developing the Swift programming language, which I think is

0:07:42.000 --> 0:07:45.760
<v Speaker 1>the thing underpinning iOS on Mac and Apple and things

0:07:45.800 --> 0:07:48.640
<v Speaker 1>like that. How did you get involved in this space

0:07:48.680 --> 0:07:51.760
<v Speaker 1>and what attracted you to sci five and the risk

0:07:51.840 --> 0:07:55.680
<v Speaker 1>five idea. Yeah, so, so I've been kicking around the

0:07:55.680 --> 0:07:58.080
<v Speaker 1>tech industry for a number of years now. Amazing how

0:07:58.160 --> 0:08:02.080
<v Speaker 1>time flies. I spent eleven plus years of Apple, for example,

0:08:02.560 --> 0:08:05.400
<v Speaker 1>but did a lot of work on fundamental low level

0:08:05.640 --> 0:08:10.200
<v Speaker 1>software called compilers. And compilers are the thing that takes

0:08:10.240 --> 0:08:13.480
<v Speaker 1>the application that a programmer rights and gets it to

0:08:13.480 --> 0:08:16.360
<v Speaker 1>work with the hardware and so that instruction set that

0:08:16.360 --> 0:08:20.480
<v Speaker 1>that that interface between hardware and software. Compilers are just

0:08:20.640 --> 0:08:23.200
<v Speaker 1>on the software side of that and they handle that

0:08:23.720 --> 0:08:26.360
<v Speaker 1>that making it work on the processor for you and

0:08:26.440 --> 0:08:28.920
<v Speaker 1>so um. As part of that, I build a number

0:08:28.960 --> 0:08:32.559
<v Speaker 1>of technologies that are all open source, including this thing

0:08:32.559 --> 0:08:34.960
<v Speaker 1>called l VM and playing and a bunch of other

0:08:35.520 --> 0:08:40.199
<v Speaker 1>compiler technologies that underpinn and enable a lot of that technology.

0:08:40.280 --> 0:08:43.000
<v Speaker 1>Right at the hardware software boundary. There are many things

0:08:43.000 --> 0:08:44.920
<v Speaker 1>that happened in Apple. We build a lot of really

0:08:44.920 --> 0:08:47.520
<v Speaker 1>great things. The Swift programming language is one of them,

0:08:47.600 --> 0:08:49.240
<v Speaker 1>and so I've done a lot of work and that

0:08:49.360 --> 0:08:52.040
<v Speaker 1>that space. Since then, I've worked a number of other places,

0:08:52.040 --> 0:08:55.560
<v Speaker 1>including Tesla and Google, workd on machine learning, infrastructure, large

0:08:55.559 --> 0:08:58.400
<v Speaker 1>scale TPUs, whole bunch of things, and it's all been

0:08:58.480 --> 0:09:04.960
<v Speaker 1>mostly this systems software working with the hardware. So when

0:09:04.960 --> 0:09:08.080
<v Speaker 1>I was considering enjoining a SCI five, the really exciting

0:09:08.120 --> 0:09:09.960
<v Speaker 1>thing to me about SCI five is is a number

0:09:09.960 --> 0:09:13.480
<v Speaker 1>of things. Is this focus on open technologies, which you

0:09:13.600 --> 0:09:15.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of have an unfair advantage when it comes to

0:09:15.559 --> 0:09:18.640
<v Speaker 1>changing the world right because people love open technologies and

0:09:18.679 --> 0:09:21.760
<v Speaker 1>a lot love the reach that you can have with them. Um,

0:09:22.120 --> 0:09:25.280
<v Speaker 1>it's just the the idea of instead of being on

0:09:25.320 --> 0:09:27.959
<v Speaker 1>the software side of the hardware software divide, be able

0:09:28.040 --> 0:09:30.800
<v Speaker 1>to straddle that. And so SCI five is both a

0:09:30.840 --> 0:09:33.520
<v Speaker 1>software company and a hardware company, and so we're able

0:09:33.559 --> 0:09:36.480
<v Speaker 1>to innovate by spanning that that gap and really doing

0:09:36.520 --> 0:09:40.400
<v Speaker 1>things that are quite next generation because we bring this

0:09:40.440 --> 0:09:43.680
<v Speaker 1>combination of knowing how the transistors work and your silicon,

0:09:43.920 --> 0:09:46.679
<v Speaker 1>but also how how to get programmers to use it.

0:09:46.920 --> 0:09:51.800
<v Speaker 1>And that's something that UM typically UH companies have really

0:09:52.160 --> 0:09:55.680
<v Speaker 1>bifurcated on. You have software companies, you have hardware companies.

0:09:55.760 --> 0:09:58.360
<v Speaker 1>It's really rare to be able to span that gap.

0:10:13.320 --> 0:10:17.040
<v Speaker 1>So give us an example of a theoretical customer, or

0:10:17.240 --> 0:10:20.880
<v Speaker 1>if you want an actual customer who comes to Risk five,

0:10:21.040 --> 0:10:23.280
<v Speaker 1>what are they looking for? What can they Why do

0:10:23.400 --> 0:10:25.680
<v Speaker 1>they go to you as opposed to someone else. What

0:10:25.800 --> 0:10:30.240
<v Speaker 1>can they get from you in terms of performance, in

0:10:30.360 --> 0:10:33.320
<v Speaker 1>terms of a product that makes sense for them that

0:10:33.559 --> 0:10:37.880
<v Speaker 1>from a business standpoint, UM can't get from somewhere else. Absolutely,

0:10:38.000 --> 0:10:41.800
<v Speaker 1>So there's many different categories. This one example is a

0:10:41.880 --> 0:10:45.959
<v Speaker 1>replacement customer. So somebody is using a product from, for example,

0:10:46.040 --> 0:10:48.839
<v Speaker 1>Myths and they're saying, hey, wow, we're building our technology

0:10:49.440 --> 0:10:53.080
<v Speaker 1>on a technology staff built by a company in bankruptcy.

0:10:53.120 --> 0:10:56.480
<v Speaker 1>Maybe that's not a good idea, right. We also have

0:10:56.559 --> 0:10:59.120
<v Speaker 1>many customers coming to us from arm designs, and so

0:10:59.200 --> 0:11:01.880
<v Speaker 1>the arm arm company has a number of CPU designs

0:11:01.880 --> 0:11:05.079
<v Speaker 1>in their portfolio, and for a variety of reasons, customers

0:11:05.080 --> 0:11:07.080
<v Speaker 1>are not as happy with that as they used to be,

0:11:07.600 --> 0:11:11.280
<v Speaker 1>and so a replacement of existing products typically they're looking

0:11:11.320 --> 0:11:14.600
<v Speaker 1>for something that is um you know, solves the same

0:11:14.720 --> 0:11:17.200
<v Speaker 1>kind of a job as what they were using before,

0:11:17.280 --> 0:11:20.320
<v Speaker 1>but is better in terms of UM the area, the

0:11:20.400 --> 0:11:24.000
<v Speaker 1>size of the hardware, or the power consumes UM and

0:11:24.160 --> 0:11:27.640
<v Speaker 1>things like this, and so Risk five as a technology

0:11:27.760 --> 0:11:29.679
<v Speaker 1>is better than many of these things out there. Is

0:11:29.720 --> 0:11:33.640
<v Speaker 1>better designed and engineered, mostly because it's much newer. And

0:11:33.720 --> 0:11:37.720
<v Speaker 1>so the technology industry has invented a lot of things,

0:11:37.800 --> 0:11:40.959
<v Speaker 1>and as with any any space, there are mistakes that

0:11:41.000 --> 0:11:43.200
<v Speaker 1>are made along the way, and Risk five is a

0:11:43.200 --> 0:11:45.240
<v Speaker 1>fresh start that allows us to get those things right

0:11:45.280 --> 0:11:47.240
<v Speaker 1>and be able to draw the best ideas from across

0:11:47.240 --> 0:11:50.280
<v Speaker 1>the industry into one one system. I think that the

0:11:50.320 --> 0:11:53.840
<v Speaker 1>other more interesting and exciting part of what sci Fi's

0:11:53.880 --> 0:11:58.319
<v Speaker 1>business is propelled by is differentiated solutions. And so while

0:11:58.440 --> 0:12:00.120
<v Speaker 1>many people come to us saying like, hey, I want

0:12:00.120 --> 0:12:02.880
<v Speaker 1>to swap this thing out, that the most fun pieces

0:12:02.920 --> 0:12:07.120
<v Speaker 1>are that we're able to enable products that nobody else

0:12:07.160 --> 0:12:11.239
<v Speaker 1>can build. And that happens because we build our processors

0:12:11.240 --> 0:12:15.000
<v Speaker 1>and our other technologies as kind of as software. And

0:12:15.040 --> 0:12:18.200
<v Speaker 1>so we build hardware with the spirit of software that's

0:12:18.280 --> 0:12:21.040
<v Speaker 1>very configurable, dynamic, and you can tune it for the

0:12:21.120 --> 0:12:23.600
<v Speaker 1>use case. And this allows you to say, hey, well,

0:12:23.640 --> 0:12:26.120
<v Speaker 1>I want to build, you know, an AI powered thing

0:12:26.280 --> 0:12:29.480
<v Speaker 1>that does voice recognition and this stuff, and so we

0:12:29.520 --> 0:12:31.679
<v Speaker 1>can give you the world's best implementation of that that's

0:12:31.760 --> 0:12:34.600
<v Speaker 1>really tuned to the use case. And here we are.

0:12:35.040 --> 0:12:39.240
<v Speaker 1>One of the macro phenomena that's going on today is

0:12:39.280 --> 0:12:41.360
<v Speaker 1>the thing that many people would call the end of

0:12:41.400 --> 0:12:45.160
<v Speaker 1>Moore's law. And so the process technology, the fabs are

0:12:45.200 --> 0:12:47.720
<v Speaker 1>not not not moving at the speed that they used to,

0:12:47.840 --> 0:12:51.160
<v Speaker 1>and the economics are really shifting. And what this means

0:12:51.240 --> 0:12:53.800
<v Speaker 1>is this means that there's an increased desire and increased

0:12:53.800 --> 0:12:57.640
<v Speaker 1>need for custom solutions. And custom solutions can be much

0:12:57.679 --> 0:12:59.840
<v Speaker 1>more power efficient, they can be more cost efficient, they

0:12:59.840 --> 0:13:04.080
<v Speaker 1>can be just better for the you know, being part

0:13:04.080 --> 0:13:07.360
<v Speaker 1>of your life as a human and they fit in

0:13:07.400 --> 0:13:10.280
<v Speaker 1>as IoT light bulbs are like all these other things.

0:13:10.720 --> 0:13:13.200
<v Speaker 1>And so that's really driving customization way that we haven't

0:13:13.240 --> 0:13:16.160
<v Speaker 1>seen before. And this is really what SCI five strength is.

0:13:17.400 --> 0:13:20.240
<v Speaker 1>So I want to go back to that replacement idea

0:13:20.559 --> 0:13:24.920
<v Speaker 1>because a big theme running through this entire semiconductors series

0:13:25.000 --> 0:13:28.719
<v Speaker 1>is the politicization of chips. And of course we've seen

0:13:28.720 --> 0:13:32.400
<v Speaker 1>the US put restrictions on China and things like that.

0:13:33.360 --> 0:13:36.160
<v Speaker 1>I think one of your customers was reported to be

0:13:36.679 --> 0:13:40.320
<v Speaker 1>Ali Baba, So I mean, is this a way for

0:13:40.559 --> 0:13:47.760
<v Speaker 1>companies too, I guess accelerate a reduction in their dependency

0:13:47.920 --> 0:13:54.600
<v Speaker 1>on things like TSMC chips or maybe Western chips from Intel. Also,

0:13:54.640 --> 0:13:58.360
<v Speaker 1>I think that's a complicated topic and I'm certainly not

0:13:58.400 --> 0:14:00.360
<v Speaker 1>an expert on that. I think there's many factors that

0:14:00.360 --> 0:14:03.920
<v Speaker 1>are going on here. Risk five is an open standard,

0:14:04.160 --> 0:14:09.560
<v Speaker 1>allows collaboration, and that collaboration happens across political boundaries, and

0:14:09.640 --> 0:14:12.720
<v Speaker 1>so the US and sci FI, for example, is investing

0:14:12.720 --> 0:14:16.240
<v Speaker 1>a lot in Risk five. China is also investing a

0:14:16.280 --> 0:14:18.920
<v Speaker 1>tremendous amount into Risk five software in particular, and they're

0:14:18.920 --> 0:14:21.960
<v Speaker 1>starting to look at Risk five hardware and so um.

0:14:21.960 --> 0:14:24.760
<v Speaker 1>From a technology perspective, this just kind of flats all

0:14:24.800 --> 0:14:27.280
<v Speaker 1>boats like this just makes things go faster, the technology

0:14:27.280 --> 0:14:32.280
<v Speaker 1>curve go that way. In terms of the plutotas politicization

0:14:32.480 --> 0:14:34.920
<v Speaker 1>of fabs and things like this, I think it really

0:14:34.920 --> 0:14:37.320
<v Speaker 1>comes down to the business model of the individual companies.

0:14:37.320 --> 0:14:40.000
<v Speaker 1>And from sci Fi's perspective, we're very happy to work

0:14:40.040 --> 0:14:44.840
<v Speaker 1>with UH, Samsung and TSMC and multiple different fabs and

0:14:45.360 --> 0:14:47.280
<v Speaker 1>UH for that. For US it's really about what our

0:14:47.320 --> 0:14:49.720
<v Speaker 1>customers are looking for and what the products they're trying

0:14:49.760 --> 0:14:51.440
<v Speaker 1>to build are and trying to find the best possible

0:14:51.480 --> 0:14:56.040
<v Speaker 1>answer for their their outcome. So the big FABS that

0:14:56.120 --> 0:15:00.360
<v Speaker 1>everybody knows when it comes to the annual manufacturer, your

0:15:01.120 --> 0:15:04.960
<v Speaker 1>their client. UM. Generally, the way it works is that

0:15:05.120 --> 0:15:10.200
<v Speaker 1>we provide technology to other hardware companies and so UM

0:15:10.320 --> 0:15:12.920
<v Speaker 1>let me give you an example of this. UM. We

0:15:12.920 --> 0:15:17.600
<v Speaker 1>we recently launched. UH there's an FPGA company called Microchip,

0:15:17.640 --> 0:15:20.560
<v Speaker 1>and they launched a product that incorporates our technology into

0:15:20.600 --> 0:15:24.160
<v Speaker 1>their product. UM, they package it up, they work with

0:15:24.200 --> 0:15:26.120
<v Speaker 1>the FABS, they do all of that work. We we

0:15:26.160 --> 0:15:29.280
<v Speaker 1>are what's called a fabulist semiconductor company, and so we

0:15:29.400 --> 0:15:32.320
<v Speaker 1>provide technology to other companies that then build build a

0:15:32.400 --> 0:15:35.680
<v Speaker 1>larger product pulled together documentation and software and things like this,

0:15:36.160 --> 0:15:39.040
<v Speaker 1>and then we enable that product to be built. UM.

0:15:39.080 --> 0:15:42.280
<v Speaker 1>There are other cases where we actually are the the

0:15:42.280 --> 0:15:45.640
<v Speaker 1>the device manufacturer, and so we do have developer boards,

0:15:45.640 --> 0:15:48.960
<v Speaker 1>for example, and so we'll make little boards that developers

0:15:48.960 --> 0:15:51.040
<v Speaker 1>can use to write software and work with risk five

0:15:51.160 --> 0:15:54.400
<v Speaker 1>and that's been very popular. I mean, all of those

0:15:54.440 --> 0:15:57.720
<v Speaker 1>sounds really great. UM. And obviously you're making a good

0:15:57.800 --> 0:16:01.880
<v Speaker 1>case for the technology, but what's what's adoption like? Do

0:16:01.960 --> 0:16:06.000
<v Speaker 1>you find that anyone is resistant to this new idea

0:16:06.160 --> 0:16:08.520
<v Speaker 1>or is everyone um sort of jumping on board with

0:16:08.600 --> 0:16:12.680
<v Speaker 1>the customization pitch. Well, So I think that there's different

0:16:12.680 --> 0:16:17.240
<v Speaker 1>aspects of this. One is risk five as a industry trend,

0:16:17.440 --> 0:16:20.720
<v Speaker 1>and there we see just a complete explosion in adoption

0:16:20.840 --> 0:16:24.360
<v Speaker 1>from kind of the who's who of companies including Google

0:16:24.400 --> 0:16:29.680
<v Speaker 1>and Video, Qualcom, Samsung, UM, Western Digital, also Ali Baba

0:16:29.760 --> 0:16:32.040
<v Speaker 1>and all kinds of all kinds of companies are are

0:16:32.080 --> 0:16:34.640
<v Speaker 1>working within doing things with Risk five, and so I

0:16:34.640 --> 0:16:37.040
<v Speaker 1>think there's a question of when, when and if does

0:16:37.160 --> 0:16:40.520
<v Speaker 1>Risk five take over everything, which I think is an

0:16:40.640 --> 0:16:44.000
<v Speaker 1>entirely possible future where you know, you fast forward a

0:16:44.040 --> 0:16:46.440
<v Speaker 1>hundred years from now, it could be risk five and

0:16:47.040 --> 0:16:50.240
<v Speaker 1>um and hopefully much sooner than a hundred years um.

0:16:50.520 --> 0:16:54.080
<v Speaker 1>With SCIE five we're in we're in effectively all of

0:16:54.120 --> 0:16:56.920
<v Speaker 1>the big semiconductors products, and we don't talk about our

0:16:56.960 --> 0:17:00.960
<v Speaker 1>customers specifically, but the adoption and the drive we're seeing

0:17:01.000 --> 0:17:04.800
<v Speaker 1>is quite intense. It's very exciting time right now. So

0:17:05.080 --> 0:17:08.119
<v Speaker 1>do you have any competitors in the Risk five space

0:17:08.240 --> 0:17:11.199
<v Speaker 1>or is it too early for that and would you

0:17:11.240 --> 0:17:14.280
<v Speaker 1>expect them to emerge at some point? Yeah, So, so

0:17:14.320 --> 0:17:17.280
<v Speaker 1>there are other companies that build risk five processors. UM

0:17:17.480 --> 0:17:20.199
<v Speaker 1>Risk five as an open standard really enables this, and

0:17:20.240 --> 0:17:23.359
<v Speaker 1>we encourage that. It depends on what you mean by competitors. So,

0:17:23.400 --> 0:17:27.760
<v Speaker 1>for example, UM risk five is why is widely adopted

0:17:27.800 --> 0:17:30.639
<v Speaker 1>within the academic context, and so there's many university projects

0:17:30.640 --> 0:17:33.200
<v Speaker 1>where people are building risk five course. UM. I don't

0:17:33.200 --> 0:17:35.840
<v Speaker 1>see these as competition. I see these as you know,

0:17:35.880 --> 0:17:38.920
<v Speaker 1>the next generation of engineers and we'd like to hire UM.

0:17:39.000 --> 0:17:42.440
<v Speaker 1>But you could say that they're playing in the same space. UM.

0:17:42.480 --> 0:17:46.320
<v Speaker 1>Many companies are also building small risk five cores themselves,

0:17:46.480 --> 0:17:48.960
<v Speaker 1>and I think that they're playing with the technology in

0:17:49.000 --> 0:17:51.640
<v Speaker 1>many cases and they're starting to understand it. UM. There

0:17:51.640 --> 0:17:54.560
<v Speaker 1>are a relatively small number of companies that are commercial

0:17:55.440 --> 0:17:58.280
<v Speaker 1>productizing and commercializing risk five course the way we are,

0:17:58.880 --> 0:18:01.119
<v Speaker 1>and I think that is also great. That's that's one

0:18:01.160 --> 0:18:04.240
<v Speaker 1>of the great things about this standard is that you

0:18:04.240 --> 0:18:07.960
<v Speaker 1>can get different implementations from different companies. UM. In comparison,

0:18:08.080 --> 0:18:10.200
<v Speaker 1>SCI five has been at it for you know, our

0:18:10.280 --> 0:18:12.760
<v Speaker 1>our team has been at for ten years. UH. SCI

0:18:12.840 --> 0:18:14.960
<v Speaker 1>five as a company has been at it for five years,

0:18:15.240 --> 0:18:18.439
<v Speaker 1>and so we're just much further ahead and than the

0:18:18.480 --> 0:18:21.119
<v Speaker 1>pack in terms of the breadth for a portfolio, the

0:18:21.119 --> 0:18:24.560
<v Speaker 1>maturity of the technology, um the established customer base. And

0:18:24.600 --> 0:18:26.960
<v Speaker 1>so I'm very thrilled that our customers love our products,

0:18:26.960 --> 0:18:31.000
<v Speaker 1>and that's really what I am We focus on. So

0:18:31.160 --> 0:18:33.840
<v Speaker 1>one of the things that's come up a few times

0:18:33.840 --> 0:18:36.919
<v Speaker 1>in some of our discussions has been, you know, you

0:18:37.000 --> 0:18:39.080
<v Speaker 1>sort of hinted at it, which is the sort of

0:18:39.119 --> 0:18:41.920
<v Speaker 1>death of Moore's law, you know, the sort of the

0:18:41.920 --> 0:18:46.800
<v Speaker 1>the increasing difficulty of the arms race, how much it

0:18:46.960 --> 0:18:51.240
<v Speaker 1>costs to improve speed size. And when we've heard from

0:18:51.240 --> 0:18:53.480
<v Speaker 1>a couple of people, they say things like you asked

0:18:53.480 --> 0:18:57.600
<v Speaker 1>the question like, okay, what could theoretically up end the

0:18:57.640 --> 0:19:00.840
<v Speaker 1>dominance of a company like Taiwan Semiconductor. And the answer

0:19:00.920 --> 0:19:04.880
<v Speaker 1>that a couple of people have given up is, well,

0:19:04.920 --> 0:19:09.960
<v Speaker 1>maybe customers don't necessarily need the very fastest chip anymore.

0:19:10.000 --> 0:19:15.040
<v Speaker 1>Maybe like the sort of traditional metrics of performance that

0:19:15.119 --> 0:19:17.439
<v Speaker 1>we sort of think about with chips, certain measures of

0:19:17.480 --> 0:19:20.879
<v Speaker 1>speed and so forth do not become the key things

0:19:20.920 --> 0:19:24.240
<v Speaker 1>that people absolutely need. I'm trying to understand a little

0:19:24.280 --> 0:19:27.880
<v Speaker 1>bit more like does risk five, does your model sort

0:19:27.880 --> 0:19:31.760
<v Speaker 1>of create the avenue for a sort of I get

0:19:31.800 --> 0:19:35.280
<v Speaker 1>maybe break in the arms race of chips such that

0:19:35.720 --> 0:19:38.439
<v Speaker 1>the industry can go in a more direction, or in

0:19:38.480 --> 0:19:43.679
<v Speaker 1>a direction that's not just about more expensive, faster chips

0:19:43.960 --> 0:19:48.000
<v Speaker 1>and offer different value propositions. But I think that it's

0:19:48.080 --> 0:19:50.919
<v Speaker 1>it's hard to paint the entire industry with one brush.

0:19:51.560 --> 0:19:55.880
<v Speaker 1>So I think that if you look at UM, for example,

0:19:55.920 --> 0:19:58.960
<v Speaker 1>the Internet of Things, IoT space for example, there are

0:19:59.040 --> 0:20:01.320
<v Speaker 1>time to market is worth a lot, right because a

0:20:01.320 --> 0:20:04.320
<v Speaker 1>lot of it is finding product market fit, and so

0:20:04.440 --> 0:20:07.520
<v Speaker 1>spending three to five years to build a chip is

0:20:07.680 --> 0:20:12.600
<v Speaker 1>really kind of an untenable place because five years from

0:20:12.600 --> 0:20:14.600
<v Speaker 1>now the industry will be changing, and you know it

0:20:14.600 --> 0:20:16.399
<v Speaker 1>doesn't it doesn't really make sense to do that. And

0:20:16.440 --> 0:20:18.520
<v Speaker 1>so I think that that that is a pretty big

0:20:18.520 --> 0:20:20.720
<v Speaker 1>shift and how people think about things from back in

0:20:20.840 --> 0:20:23.959
<v Speaker 1>the Windows PC days, where until it would come out

0:20:24.000 --> 0:20:26.119
<v Speaker 1>with a chip every every so often and it was

0:20:26.160 --> 0:20:29.000
<v Speaker 1>just the steady, say, march up and performance. On the

0:20:29.040 --> 0:20:30.800
<v Speaker 1>other hand, I think you look in the server space,

0:20:30.840 --> 0:20:34.320
<v Speaker 1>for example, and there there you're kind of limited by power,

0:20:34.680 --> 0:20:38.119
<v Speaker 1>and so each each socket in a large scale cloud

0:20:38.240 --> 0:20:41.720
<v Speaker 1>data center can dissipate roughly two hundred fifty watts, and

0:20:41.800 --> 0:20:44.080
<v Speaker 1>so the question is how much how do you get

0:20:44.200 --> 0:20:46.359
<v Speaker 1>how much can you get out of that? Right? And

0:20:46.440 --> 0:20:49.879
<v Speaker 1>so to me, uh, we we as an industry have

0:20:50.200 --> 0:20:56.040
<v Speaker 1>solved that problem by pushing, pushing process technology and chasing

0:20:56.080 --> 0:20:57.959
<v Speaker 1>from one fab node to the next, which is very

0:20:58.000 --> 0:21:01.280
<v Speaker 1>expensive and as you say, it's it's not a particularly

0:21:01.320 --> 0:21:04.439
<v Speaker 1>scalable approach. The other way to tackle this is to

0:21:04.680 --> 0:21:08.320
<v Speaker 1>innovate in the hardware. And so what we're seeing now

0:21:08.400 --> 0:21:11.440
<v Speaker 1>is we're seeing a rise of GPUs, and we're seeing

0:21:11.440 --> 0:21:13.639
<v Speaker 1>a rise of machine learning accelerators, and we're seeing a

0:21:13.720 --> 0:21:18.199
<v Speaker 1>rise of other other accelerators, and to date they're primarily

0:21:18.840 --> 0:21:22.879
<v Speaker 1>purpose built. So I want to accelerate video and cooding,

0:21:23.480 --> 0:21:25.440
<v Speaker 1>you know. And so if I want to accelerate video

0:21:25.440 --> 0:21:27.800
<v Speaker 1>and cooding, I can build a box that does video encoding,

0:21:27.840 --> 0:21:30.199
<v Speaker 1>and I can build a chip for video encoding. The

0:21:30.240 --> 0:21:32.399
<v Speaker 1>far extreme of that is I want a fully general

0:21:32.440 --> 0:21:34.560
<v Speaker 1>box that can do anything. And that's what you see

0:21:34.560 --> 0:21:38.879
<v Speaker 1>with typical CPUs. There's a big space in the middle

0:21:38.960 --> 0:21:41.880
<v Speaker 1>where you say, if you're a cloud provider, for example,

0:21:42.680 --> 0:21:45.520
<v Speaker 1>I want to be able to run a wide range

0:21:45.600 --> 0:21:48.760
<v Speaker 1>of different specialized workloads. And so I want to do

0:21:48.800 --> 0:21:50.520
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of video encoding, I want to do

0:21:50.520 --> 0:21:52.199
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of signal processing. I want to do

0:21:52.200 --> 0:21:54.639
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of machine learning. I want to do

0:21:54.640 --> 0:21:56.040
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of graphics. I want to do a

0:21:56.080 --> 0:21:57.960
<v Speaker 1>little bit of this. And so what you can do

0:21:58.000 --> 0:22:01.919
<v Speaker 1>is you can build what are called heterogeneous computers. And

0:22:01.960 --> 0:22:06.760
<v Speaker 1>these heterogeneous computers can have accelerators for different domains and

0:22:06.920 --> 0:22:10.159
<v Speaker 1>assembling those together into one package is something that you know,

0:22:10.240 --> 0:22:13.760
<v Speaker 1>Risk five is standard and a lot of the ecosystem

0:22:13.880 --> 0:22:16.480
<v Speaker 1>that we're helping drive well, I think really changes the

0:22:16.560 --> 0:22:19.080
<v Speaker 1>nature of compute. And so I think that we as

0:22:19.119 --> 0:22:21.919
<v Speaker 1>an industry or shifting and it's kind of hard to

0:22:21.960 --> 0:22:25.400
<v Speaker 1>see the end state from you know, we're halfway through

0:22:25.400 --> 0:22:45.119
<v Speaker 1>this transition, but it's a really exciting time. So going forward,

0:22:45.359 --> 0:22:49.040
<v Speaker 1>how do we know if people are using Risk five?

0:22:49.160 --> 0:22:52.080
<v Speaker 1>So my understanding is that you know, if you're using

0:22:52.119 --> 0:22:54.960
<v Speaker 1>something from ARM, you have to sign like some sort

0:22:54.960 --> 0:22:57.080
<v Speaker 1>of licensee agreement and we can kind of figure out

0:22:57.080 --> 0:23:00.639
<v Speaker 1>who signed those. But I don't think using Risk five

0:23:00.720 --> 0:23:03.520
<v Speaker 1>you necessarily have to disclose what you're doing because it's

0:23:03.880 --> 0:23:07.760
<v Speaker 1>open source. How how do we know what adoption actually

0:23:07.760 --> 0:23:10.800
<v Speaker 1>looks like and how how much this gets embedded in

0:23:10.840 --> 0:23:15.840
<v Speaker 1>the actual industry. Well, so it's it's hard to get

0:23:15.960 --> 0:23:19.880
<v Speaker 1>precise metrics. So for example, in video has proactively said

0:23:19.920 --> 0:23:22.560
<v Speaker 1>we use RISK five and our g v us, right,

0:23:22.600 --> 0:23:25.040
<v Speaker 1>and so if they if they had not said that,

0:23:25.080 --> 0:23:28.000
<v Speaker 1>then nobody would know. It's just an internal implementation detail

0:23:28.080 --> 0:23:31.639
<v Speaker 1>and it's not exposed. And so, UM, I don't think

0:23:31.680 --> 0:23:34.359
<v Speaker 1>you'll ever get a true number. But what we can

0:23:34.400 --> 0:23:39.160
<v Speaker 1>see is the number of members of the open Risk

0:23:39.200 --> 0:23:43.040
<v Speaker 1>five Foundation, for example, is just exploding, right. We know

0:23:43.119 --> 0:23:45.560
<v Speaker 1>that the number of design wins coming out of companies

0:23:45.560 --> 0:23:48.159
<v Speaker 1>like sci Fi for example, is just going exponential. We

0:23:48.240 --> 0:23:51.760
<v Speaker 1>see we see, uh, you see the metrics and the

0:23:51.760 --> 0:23:55.080
<v Speaker 1>the secondary indicators that that you can tell that there's

0:23:55.200 --> 0:23:57.040
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of momentum and a lot a lot

0:23:57.119 --> 0:23:59.600
<v Speaker 1>driving this. And so while it's very difficult to know

0:23:59.760 --> 0:24:02.600
<v Speaker 1>the precise number of design winds or the precise number

0:24:02.600 --> 0:24:07.240
<v Speaker 1>of transistors configured for Risk five, we know it's it's incredible.

0:24:08.240 --> 0:24:11.720
<v Speaker 1>So I have a weird question. But um, we've talked

0:24:11.760 --> 0:24:14.080
<v Speaker 1>a little bit about this on the podcast the sort

0:24:14.119 --> 0:24:17.880
<v Speaker 1>of culture around open source technology on Silicon Valley. We've

0:24:17.920 --> 0:24:21.240
<v Speaker 1>spoken about it with the Camille Fournier and people like that.

0:24:21.320 --> 0:24:27.680
<v Speaker 1>But is it weird too commercialize and open source technology

0:24:27.760 --> 0:24:30.480
<v Speaker 1>like this. I've seen some people like in Risk five

0:24:30.560 --> 0:24:34.399
<v Speaker 1>to Linux, like does it does it feel weird to

0:24:34.440 --> 0:24:36.600
<v Speaker 1>be doing that or does it feel like this sort

0:24:36.600 --> 0:24:41.160
<v Speaker 1>of commercialization is what's needed to get that technology rolled

0:24:41.160 --> 0:24:44.040
<v Speaker 1>out to a wider group. Yeah, So, I mean, I

0:24:44.760 --> 0:24:46.480
<v Speaker 1>there are many different ways of looking at this. I've

0:24:46.560 --> 0:24:49.240
<v Speaker 1>I've worked on open source and open technologies for a

0:24:49.240 --> 0:24:51.639
<v Speaker 1>couple of decades. Now I can I can share some

0:24:51.720 --> 0:24:54.960
<v Speaker 1>examples of that. So at Apple, for example, we built

0:24:55.080 --> 0:24:59.160
<v Speaker 1>these compiler tools and these technologies that that application developers

0:24:59.280 --> 0:25:01.600
<v Speaker 1>used to build their apps, right, which is a very

0:25:01.640 --> 0:25:06.800
<v Speaker 1>meta thing. Um. And so Apple is a company that

0:25:06.840 --> 0:25:09.960
<v Speaker 1>believes in producing value and keeping it proprietary, of course,

0:25:10.280 --> 0:25:13.159
<v Speaker 1>but even in that context, there was incredible value in

0:25:13.240 --> 0:25:16.679
<v Speaker 1>making that open and sharing sharing contributions that they were

0:25:16.680 --> 0:25:19.800
<v Speaker 1>doing with the world, because they then were able to

0:25:20.000 --> 0:25:22.360
<v Speaker 1>benefit from the work that everybody else in the industry

0:25:22.440 --> 0:25:26.720
<v Speaker 1>was doing. And so that open standard, the open technology,

0:25:26.760 --> 0:25:28.840
<v Speaker 1>the open source code that was being developed, was not

0:25:29.040 --> 0:25:32.680
<v Speaker 1>the differentiating value for their products. It was the enabling

0:25:32.680 --> 0:25:36.840
<v Speaker 1>technology that they benefited from. You know, Google used the

0:25:36.880 --> 0:25:39.320
<v Speaker 1>same technology in their data centers and like that was

0:25:39.359 --> 0:25:41.760
<v Speaker 1>actually great for Apple because you know, all the work

0:25:41.840 --> 0:25:45.040
<v Speaker 1>that Google put into it directly benefited Apple and Apple's products.

0:25:45.240 --> 0:25:48.840
<v Speaker 1>So um, I think that there's a long, long balance

0:25:48.840 --> 0:25:51.720
<v Speaker 1>of trying to figure out what to open, how best

0:25:51.720 --> 0:25:55.360
<v Speaker 1>to work in foster communities. With five, I think I'm

0:25:55.359 --> 0:25:58.520
<v Speaker 1>seeing very similar results that I saw I've seen in

0:25:58.560 --> 0:26:01.960
<v Speaker 1>other domains where open has a lot of advantages that

0:26:02.000 --> 0:26:05.080
<v Speaker 1>are hard to quantify. So for example, there are you know,

0:26:05.080 --> 0:26:08.240
<v Speaker 1>we're all humans, and humans like to work on things

0:26:08.240 --> 0:26:12.960
<v Speaker 1>with large scale impact, and so um, open technologies arguably

0:26:13.520 --> 0:26:16.719
<v Speaker 1>are it's easier to draw the best minds into working

0:26:16.760 --> 0:26:19.600
<v Speaker 1>on open technologies because they end up having larger impact

0:26:19.600 --> 0:26:22.720
<v Speaker 1>on the world. The way that risk five is defined

0:26:22.800 --> 0:26:27.200
<v Speaker 1>and standardized and driven in the ecosystem is by an

0:26:27.200 --> 0:26:32.439
<v Speaker 1>open committee development standardization process, and it's kind of the

0:26:32.440 --> 0:26:35.560
<v Speaker 1>who's who's of gurus in the industry. They are coming

0:26:35.560 --> 0:26:38.520
<v Speaker 1>together to make sure that the best ideas win and

0:26:38.560 --> 0:26:41.360
<v Speaker 1>you get you get a really good result, and it's

0:26:41.400 --> 0:26:43.640
<v Speaker 1>kind of hard hard to match that with a company

0:26:43.640 --> 0:26:46.000
<v Speaker 1>off in the corner that even if they're a massive

0:26:46.000 --> 0:26:50.480
<v Speaker 1>semiconductor company, they still have only a slice of the bright,

0:26:50.760 --> 0:26:54.320
<v Speaker 1>bright minds in the industry. And so there's there's a

0:26:54.320 --> 0:26:57.320
<v Speaker 1>lot of there's a lot of nuanced pieces of this.

0:26:57.680 --> 0:27:00.800
<v Speaker 1>But then also you there has to be a business model,

0:27:01.119 --> 0:27:03.600
<v Speaker 1>right we have sci fi or for profit company we

0:27:03.640 --> 0:27:07.520
<v Speaker 1>are you know, we're we're here to build a scalable

0:27:07.720 --> 0:27:12.359
<v Speaker 1>business that is an amazing an amazing feed by itself.

0:27:12.960 --> 0:27:15.960
<v Speaker 1>And so the question is how do you fund and

0:27:16.000 --> 0:27:20.560
<v Speaker 1>propel and make the open technologies thrive while also having

0:27:20.560 --> 0:27:23.800
<v Speaker 1>sustainable businesses that you can you know, pay your engineers

0:27:23.840 --> 0:27:26.360
<v Speaker 1>to work on the open technology and that that divide

0:27:26.440 --> 0:27:29.600
<v Speaker 1>is often tricky. But if you look you look to

0:27:29.680 --> 0:27:32.600
<v Speaker 1>the industry, Red Hat for example, as a company that

0:27:33.480 --> 0:27:36.280
<v Speaker 1>was built on Linux and they put tons of engineering

0:27:36.280 --> 0:27:38.720
<v Speaker 1>at the Linux and they build a great services business

0:27:38.760 --> 0:27:41.680
<v Speaker 1>and there are now a huge part of IBM. Right. Um.

0:27:41.800 --> 0:27:43.840
<v Speaker 1>So there's many, many of these companies that have found

0:27:43.840 --> 0:27:49.000
<v Speaker 1>different business models. Google, for example, is apparently a profitable company,

0:27:49.080 --> 0:27:52.600
<v Speaker 1>you could say, um and and they are built and

0:27:52.920 --> 0:27:56.320
<v Speaker 1>contribute a tremendous amount of open technologies. And so it's

0:27:56.359 --> 0:27:58.520
<v Speaker 1>it's all about figuring out the divide and there's different

0:27:58.520 --> 0:28:01.280
<v Speaker 1>divides that makes sense for different industry sectors and different

0:28:01.280 --> 0:28:04.080
<v Speaker 1>technologies and different companies, but I think it's a pretty

0:28:04.080 --> 0:28:06.880
<v Speaker 1>proven model by this point, and and for it's worth,

0:28:06.960 --> 0:28:10.560
<v Speaker 1>I think that open software is much further ahead than

0:28:10.640 --> 0:28:13.240
<v Speaker 1>open hardware, and so I think that we're really on

0:28:13.320 --> 0:28:15.600
<v Speaker 1>the leading edge of that for hardware, and I think

0:28:15.600 --> 0:28:18.159
<v Speaker 1>that ten years from now it's going to be a

0:28:18.160 --> 0:28:23.440
<v Speaker 1>completely different world. Well, Chris, that was really really interesting,

0:28:23.520 --> 0:28:26.240
<v Speaker 1>and I think we're all going to be um watching

0:28:26.320 --> 0:28:29.160
<v Speaker 1>what happens with Risk five and with SCI five for

0:28:29.240 --> 0:28:31.080
<v Speaker 1>years to come. So thank you so much. We really

0:28:31.119 --> 0:28:34.880
<v Speaker 1>appreciate that. Yeah, thank you for having me. Thanks Chris.

0:28:34.880 --> 0:28:55.880
<v Speaker 1>That was awesome. So Joe, I'm glad we had Chris on.

0:28:56.280 --> 0:28:59.760
<v Speaker 1>Definitely a little bit different to what we spoke about

0:29:00.040 --> 0:29:03.040
<v Speaker 1>on some of our other semiconductor podcasts, But I think

0:29:03.040 --> 0:29:05.400
<v Speaker 1>there are two things that probably stand out. One is

0:29:05.440 --> 0:29:08.800
<v Speaker 1>that idea of Risk five as a cheat for the

0:29:08.920 --> 0:29:11.360
<v Speaker 1>end of Moore's law, Like if you can't eke out

0:29:11.400 --> 0:29:14.280
<v Speaker 1>any more efficiencies in terms of the actual technology, then

0:29:14.400 --> 0:29:17.320
<v Speaker 1>maybe you could do it through customization and the way

0:29:17.360 --> 0:29:20.080
<v Speaker 1>that technology works with the rest of the system. And

0:29:20.080 --> 0:29:21.880
<v Speaker 1>then I guess the second one is this idea that

0:29:21.960 --> 0:29:26.000
<v Speaker 1>Risk five might actually be a way of increasing independence

0:29:26.080 --> 0:29:29.480
<v Speaker 1>away from some of the big manufacturers. Yeah. No, I

0:29:29.520 --> 0:29:32.080
<v Speaker 1>thought that was super interesting and just this like this

0:29:32.160 --> 0:29:34.240
<v Speaker 1>idea that's like, Okay, you have all these companies that

0:29:34.280 --> 0:29:37.240
<v Speaker 1>could build the chips, you have these end customers that

0:29:37.320 --> 0:29:41.040
<v Speaker 1>have specific needs, you know, you could I think, like

0:29:41.080 --> 0:29:42.960
<v Speaker 1>he said, I don't know the exact word, but the

0:29:43.000 --> 0:29:46.000
<v Speaker 1>idea of like mindshare, like people like working on open

0:29:46.040 --> 0:29:50.920
<v Speaker 1>source products, people like being part of something that's potentially

0:29:50.960 --> 0:29:55.000
<v Speaker 1>world changing. So it seems like potentially one of these

0:29:55.040 --> 0:29:57.760
<v Speaker 1>things where it's like sure, like the sort of dominant

0:29:57.800 --> 0:30:01.640
<v Speaker 1>players in the industry, the dominant platforms X say, the

0:30:01.760 --> 0:30:04.960
<v Speaker 1>six arm et cetera, aren't going anywhere, but you can

0:30:05.360 --> 0:30:09.200
<v Speaker 1>very easily, as he describes it, imagine it just continuing

0:30:09.240 --> 0:30:13.280
<v Speaker 1>to gather steam over the long term. Yeah. Um, definitely

0:30:13.280 --> 0:30:16.240
<v Speaker 1>an interesting one to watch. And I guess the issue

0:30:16.400 --> 0:30:19.320
<v Speaker 1>is who comes out and announces that they're actually using it,

0:30:19.360 --> 0:30:22.280
<v Speaker 1>so we get a good idea of what adoption actually

0:30:22.280 --> 0:30:25.760
<v Speaker 1>looks like. All right, well but no, definitely, UM going

0:30:25.800 --> 0:30:28.120
<v Speaker 1>to have it on my radar. Yeah, um, this is

0:30:28.120 --> 0:30:33.040
<v Speaker 1>our gift to add thoughts listeners demanding more semiconductor content. UM,

0:30:33.120 --> 0:30:36.040
<v Speaker 1>hope you enjoyed it, and I'm sure we'll be recording

0:30:36.120 --> 0:30:40.000
<v Speaker 1>more semiconductor episodes eventually, but for now, we're going to

0:30:40.080 --> 0:30:42.560
<v Speaker 1>move on to some other things. Right. I think there's

0:30:42.560 --> 0:30:44.320
<v Speaker 1>some other stuff going on that we should talk about

0:30:45.000 --> 0:30:49.360
<v Speaker 1>in markets No way, Okay, all right, this has been

0:30:49.480 --> 0:30:52.719
<v Speaker 1>another episode of the All Thoughts Podcast. I'm Tracy Alloway.

0:30:52.800 --> 0:30:56.040
<v Speaker 1>You can follow me on Twitter at Tracy Alloway and

0:30:56.080 --> 0:30:58.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm Joe Why Isn't All? You can follow me on

0:30:58.280 --> 0:31:01.160
<v Speaker 1>Twitter at the Stalwart. You can follow our guest Chris

0:31:01.240 --> 0:31:05.560
<v Speaker 1>Latner on Twitter. He's at Sea Latner Underscore l l

0:31:05.680 --> 0:31:10.320
<v Speaker 1>v M. Follow our producer Laura Carlson. She's at Laura M. Carlson.

0:31:10.760 --> 0:31:14.560
<v Speaker 1>Follow the Bloomberg head of podcast, Francesco Levie at Francesco Today,

0:31:14.680 --> 0:31:17.640
<v Speaker 1>and check out all of our podcasts under the handle

0:31:17.920 --> 0:31:19.760
<v Speaker 1>AD Podcasts. Thanks for listening.