WEBVTT - Chuck’s Commentary - U.S. Is Drifting Toward Competitive Authoritarianism +  Social Media Has Fueled Extremism

0:00:00.040 --> 0:00:02.840
<v Speaker 1>It's sponsorship time. But you know what, it's really great

0:00:02.880 --> 0:00:05.720
<v Speaker 1>when you get a sponsor that you already use.

0:00:05.960 --> 0:00:06.560
<v Speaker 2>And guess what.

0:00:06.720 --> 0:00:09.639
<v Speaker 1>Quint's is something that in the Todd household we already

0:00:09.680 --> 0:00:11.320
<v Speaker 1>go to. Why do we go to Quint's Because it's

0:00:11.320 --> 0:00:13.480
<v Speaker 1>a place you go where you can get some really

0:00:13.560 --> 0:00:17.279
<v Speaker 1>nice clothes without the really expensive prices. And one of

0:00:17.280 --> 0:00:19.640
<v Speaker 1>the things I've been going through is I've transitioned from

0:00:19.640 --> 0:00:22.720
<v Speaker 1>being mister cot and tie guy to wanting a little

0:00:22.760 --> 0:00:25.640
<v Speaker 1>more casual but to look nice doing it. Is I've

0:00:25.680 --> 0:00:27.240
<v Speaker 1>become mister quarter zip guy.

0:00:27.320 --> 0:00:27.880
<v Speaker 2>Well guess what.

0:00:28.040 --> 0:00:31.920
<v Speaker 1>Guess he's got amazing amounts of quarter zips. It is Quints.

0:00:32.479 --> 0:00:36.000
<v Speaker 1>I have gotten quite a few already from there. The

0:00:36.040 --> 0:00:40.720
<v Speaker 1>stuff's really nice. They have Mongolian cashmere sweaters for fifty dollars.

0:00:40.840 --> 0:00:43.320
<v Speaker 1>I just know, hey, cashmere, that's pretty good. You don't

0:00:43.320 --> 0:00:46.400
<v Speaker 1>normally get that for fifty bucks or less. Italian wool

0:00:46.440 --> 0:00:49.279
<v Speaker 1>coats that look and feel like designer the stuff. I'll

0:00:49.280 --> 0:00:51.160
<v Speaker 1>be honest, right, you look at it online, you think, okay,

0:00:51.200 --> 0:00:52.680
<v Speaker 1>is this really as nice as it looks? Well, when

0:00:52.680 --> 0:00:54.600
<v Speaker 1>I got it, I was like, oh, this is real quality.

0:00:54.680 --> 0:00:57.080
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, I'm going to end up making sure I

0:00:57.120 --> 0:00:59.080
<v Speaker 1>take it to my dry cleaner so I don't screw

0:00:59.080 --> 0:01:02.160
<v Speaker 1>it up when I clean it. But I've been quite impressed.

0:01:02.160 --> 0:01:05.560
<v Speaker 1>In Hey, it's holiday season. It is impossible to shop

0:01:06.000 --> 0:01:08.760
<v Speaker 1>for us middle aged men. I know this well. Tell

0:01:08.800 --> 0:01:12.480
<v Speaker 1>your kids, tell your spouses, tell your partners. Try Quints.

0:01:12.720 --> 0:01:14.760
<v Speaker 1>Or if you're trying to figure out what to get

0:01:14.800 --> 0:01:17.840
<v Speaker 1>your adult child, what to get your mom or dad,

0:01:18.000 --> 0:01:20.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm telling you you're gonna find something that is going

0:01:20.319 --> 0:01:23.039
<v Speaker 1>to be comfortable for them on Quints. So get your

0:01:23.080 --> 0:01:26.600
<v Speaker 1>wardrobe sorted and your gift list handled with Quints.

0:01:26.720 --> 0:01:27.160
<v Speaker 2>Don't wait.

0:01:27.240 --> 0:01:30.440
<v Speaker 1>Go to quints dot com slash chuck for free shipping

0:01:30.480 --> 0:01:32.759
<v Speaker 1>on your order and three hundred and sixty five day

0:01:32.800 --> 0:01:36.800
<v Speaker 1>returns now available in Canada as well. That's qui nce

0:01:37.319 --> 0:01:41.320
<v Speaker 1>dot com, slash chuck, free shipping and three hundred and

0:01:41.400 --> 0:01:45.360
<v Speaker 1>sixty five day returns quints dot com slash chuck.

0:01:46.200 --> 0:01:49.640
<v Speaker 2>Use that code.

0:01:50.880 --> 0:01:53.600
<v Speaker 1>Hello there, Happy Monday, and welcome to another episode of

0:01:53.640 --> 0:01:57.720
<v Speaker 1>the Chuck Podcast. We are ticking ever so closer to

0:01:58.520 --> 0:02:03.120
<v Speaker 1>the holiday break first night of Hanukkah, ten days to Christmas,

0:02:03.600 --> 0:02:07.640
<v Speaker 1>the New sixteen days to New Year's Eve, and of

0:02:07.680 --> 0:02:13.760
<v Speaker 1>course when I'm counting down five days until the University

0:02:13.760 --> 0:02:17.440
<v Speaker 1>of Miami's debut in the college football Playoff, I've got

0:02:17.440 --> 0:02:23.000
<v Speaker 1>a pretty good I've got a pretty sort of robust

0:02:23.240 --> 0:02:26.480
<v Speaker 1>show today that's going to hit a bunch of topics.

0:02:27.200 --> 0:02:35.040
<v Speaker 1>A fascinating and an incredibly important study by some from

0:02:35.080 --> 0:02:37.680
<v Speaker 1>some folks from the Council on Foreign Affairs about the

0:02:37.720 --> 0:02:42.520
<v Speaker 1>state of the United States and its democracy. It's extraordinarily

0:02:42.600 --> 0:02:43.280
<v Speaker 1>important read.

0:02:43.400 --> 0:02:43.880
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to.

0:02:44.120 --> 0:02:47.080
<v Speaker 1>Pass on the highlights in a minute, fascinating new poll

0:02:48.000 --> 0:02:51.240
<v Speaker 1>from the Searchlight Institute on corruption and more and portantly,

0:02:51.320 --> 0:02:54.880
<v Speaker 1>it's not about the concern about political corruption. It's about

0:02:54.880 --> 0:03:00.000
<v Speaker 1>what voters believe is corrupt versus sometimes what lawmakers.

0:02:59.480 --> 0:03:00.560
<v Speaker 2>View as corrupt.

0:03:00.880 --> 0:03:04.680
<v Speaker 1>Here's a hint. Let's just say that they don't share

0:03:04.919 --> 0:03:08.160
<v Speaker 1>the same definition of what is political corruption these days.

0:03:08.720 --> 0:03:10.760
<v Speaker 1>It is Monday, which means we're going to hop into

0:03:10.760 --> 0:03:14.880
<v Speaker 1>the time machine, and I'm just going to give you

0:03:14.880 --> 0:03:17.000
<v Speaker 1>one hint at what I'm going to be talking about

0:03:17.040 --> 0:03:17.320
<v Speaker 1>in the.

0:03:17.280 --> 0:03:21.680
<v Speaker 2>Time machine monorail, mono rail, monorail.

0:03:22.360 --> 0:03:25.400
<v Speaker 1>How many of you will figure out what I'm going

0:03:25.440 --> 0:03:28.040
<v Speaker 1>to talk about based on that hint? Guess what I

0:03:29.160 --> 0:03:31.280
<v Speaker 1>won't actually find out the answer to that. But I

0:03:31.320 --> 0:03:33.760
<v Speaker 1>thought that would be a fun little clue. We'll do

0:03:33.840 --> 0:03:36.200
<v Speaker 1>some ask Chuck and I have a few thoughts on

0:03:36.240 --> 0:03:40.080
<v Speaker 1>the state of college athletics given what happened what we're

0:03:40.120 --> 0:03:42.320
<v Speaker 1>watching at the University of Michigan.

0:03:42.360 --> 0:03:43.400
<v Speaker 2>But I'm going to start.

0:03:44.760 --> 0:03:49.440
<v Speaker 1>With the news out of Australia. It's pretty painful first

0:03:49.520 --> 0:03:54.800
<v Speaker 1>night of Hanuka around the world, that this is what

0:03:55.640 --> 0:03:57.280
<v Speaker 1>all of us had to wake up to on Sunday

0:03:57.320 --> 0:04:01.160
<v Speaker 1>morning here in the United States and what the world

0:04:01.280 --> 0:04:04.720
<v Speaker 1>is grappling with, and that is just yet another reminder

0:04:06.520 --> 0:04:14.400
<v Speaker 1>of that anti Semitism is at an ugly level globally

0:04:14.680 --> 0:04:19.600
<v Speaker 1>right now. Look, this is anti Semitism is not new.

0:04:19.920 --> 0:04:24.000
<v Speaker 1>We've gone through fits and starts. Anybody who's Jewish knows

0:04:24.000 --> 0:04:26.359
<v Speaker 1>the history. We know the history of this quite well.

0:04:27.080 --> 0:04:33.640
<v Speaker 1>The rise and falls of attempts eradicating Jews, blaming Jews

0:04:33.839 --> 0:04:38.640
<v Speaker 1>for financial problems, blaming Jews for cultural problems. We are

0:04:38.680 --> 0:04:41.680
<v Speaker 1>the smallest of the major religions. We are the smallest

0:04:42.320 --> 0:04:45.760
<v Speaker 1>of groups that there are. It's amazing how much power

0:04:45.880 --> 0:04:50.680
<v Speaker 1>so many people try to attribute to us, and we're

0:04:50.760 --> 0:04:55.600
<v Speaker 1>not even three percent of the world's population. Obviously what

0:04:55.640 --> 0:04:58.800
<v Speaker 1>we've been You know, there's a lot of people that

0:04:58.839 --> 0:05:02.040
<v Speaker 1>are looking at this and and immediately trying to make

0:05:02.080 --> 0:05:06.400
<v Speaker 1>a political argument, to make the case that it's the

0:05:06.480 --> 0:05:12.200
<v Speaker 1>left that is supercharging antisemitism or the right that is

0:05:12.200 --> 0:05:17.440
<v Speaker 1>supercharging antisemitism. I will remind you all once again, I

0:05:17.520 --> 0:05:20.040
<v Speaker 1>have only experienced it in stereo.

0:05:20.680 --> 0:05:21.159
<v Speaker 2>All right.

0:05:21.240 --> 0:05:25.159
<v Speaker 1>Before twenty fifteen, I experienced very little anti semitism, if

0:05:25.240 --> 0:05:27.080
<v Speaker 1>any at all. I think I shared a story with

0:05:27.120 --> 0:05:30.280
<v Speaker 1>you an old friend of mine, we were talking about

0:05:30.279 --> 0:05:34.839
<v Speaker 1>this one time, and sort of right right when the

0:05:34.960 --> 0:05:37.760
<v Speaker 1>rise of sort of it was those of us in

0:05:37.760 --> 0:05:39.719
<v Speaker 1>the press that were starting to feel it first, and

0:05:39.760 --> 0:05:43.000
<v Speaker 1>then it sort of broke open out into the mainstream.

0:05:43.400 --> 0:05:46.720
<v Speaker 1>But in twenty fifteen, twenty sixteen, you can say it

0:05:46.760 --> 0:05:50.599
<v Speaker 1>was coincidental with the timing of the rise of Donald Trump,

0:05:50.800 --> 0:05:56.000
<v Speaker 1>or if that is what sort of essentially lifted up

0:05:57.160 --> 0:05:59.440
<v Speaker 1>the pretext on all of this. But essentially the rise

0:05:59.600 --> 0:06:01.920
<v Speaker 1>of the postopulous left with Bernie Sanders and the rise

0:06:01.960 --> 0:06:04.800
<v Speaker 1>of the populos right with Donald Trump has given a

0:06:04.839 --> 0:06:10.160
<v Speaker 1>permission slip to anti semits to either to either use

0:06:10.200 --> 0:06:12.839
<v Speaker 1>it to promote a left wing ideology or use it

0:06:12.880 --> 0:06:14.400
<v Speaker 1>to promote a right wing ideology.

0:06:15.200 --> 0:06:15.880
<v Speaker 2>Here's what I will say.

0:06:15.920 --> 0:06:18.039
<v Speaker 1>If you're using anti Semitism to try to promote the

0:06:18.080 --> 0:06:21.920
<v Speaker 1>left or the right, you're obviously doing it wrong. And

0:06:22.000 --> 0:06:25.719
<v Speaker 1>you're not very small d democratic, and you certainly don't

0:06:25.760 --> 0:06:29.760
<v Speaker 1>believe in freedom, that's for sure, freedom of anything, let

0:06:29.760 --> 0:06:34.360
<v Speaker 1>alone freedom of religion on that front. But I remember

0:06:34.400 --> 0:06:36.680
<v Speaker 1>talking with this old friend of mine and we were

0:06:36.720 --> 0:06:41.400
<v Speaker 1>talking about how our mothers would tell us these stories

0:06:41.480 --> 0:06:48.480
<v Speaker 1>about anti about their about their anti Semitic experiences in

0:06:48.520 --> 0:06:53.840
<v Speaker 1>grade school and high school. My mother's second generation in America.

0:06:53.880 --> 0:06:57.919
<v Speaker 1>I believe his parents were first generation, and you know,

0:06:58.160 --> 0:07:00.240
<v Speaker 1>they would tell us these stories, and my friend and

0:07:00.240 --> 0:07:01.880
<v Speaker 1>I would sit there and go, you know, my mother

0:07:01.960 --> 0:07:03.880
<v Speaker 1>would tell these stories about you know, kids in her

0:07:03.920 --> 0:07:06.320
<v Speaker 1>high school looking for her horns or asking about her tail.

0:07:08.640 --> 0:07:10.560
<v Speaker 1>And you know, he would say that, you know, his

0:07:10.640 --> 0:07:12.640
<v Speaker 1>mother would you share similar things? And we would just

0:07:12.680 --> 0:07:15.880
<v Speaker 1>look at them like they were strange beings. That's this

0:07:15.920 --> 0:07:16.760
<v Speaker 1>can't be the case.

0:07:16.800 --> 0:07:19.119
<v Speaker 2>What do you tell? You know? I didn't.

0:07:19.400 --> 0:07:22.080
<v Speaker 1>I didn't want to say I was dismissing mother, But

0:07:22.120 --> 0:07:24.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, you think, well, maybe our parents.

0:07:24.160 --> 0:07:25.600
<v Speaker 2>Are exaggerating a little bit.

0:07:25.760 --> 0:07:28.880
<v Speaker 1>You know maybe, and I'll tell you ten years later,

0:07:29.040 --> 0:07:31.480
<v Speaker 1>a right, eleven years now, we're almost we're getting close

0:07:31.520 --> 0:07:34.640
<v Speaker 1>to the eleventh year of sort of this what has

0:07:34.760 --> 0:07:37.840
<v Speaker 1>been a consistent uptick? Really really you can I do

0:07:37.960 --> 0:07:41.560
<v Speaker 1>believe the line of demarcation is June twenty fifteen, but

0:07:41.640 --> 0:07:43.120
<v Speaker 1>you can see this uptick.

0:07:42.920 --> 0:07:43.840
<v Speaker 2>And it is.

0:07:44.200 --> 0:07:49.120
<v Speaker 1>This is not something that either side if we're going

0:07:49.160 --> 0:07:50.840
<v Speaker 1>to try to make this always a two way fight

0:07:51.200 --> 0:07:52.280
<v Speaker 1>between whose fault is it?

0:07:52.320 --> 0:07:56.120
<v Speaker 2>Is it the left, isn't the right? This is collective.

0:07:57.280 --> 0:07:59.240
<v Speaker 1>And there's a lot of there's a lot of blame

0:07:59.560 --> 0:08:02.560
<v Speaker 1>to go around, but I think the one that's sing singular,

0:08:03.040 --> 0:08:07.200
<v Speaker 1>singular for blame and most important is social media. In this,

0:08:07.480 --> 0:08:09.960
<v Speaker 1>we've always had to anti semis. We've always had hate

0:08:09.960 --> 0:08:13.840
<v Speaker 1>in the world, Okay, just it's just a fact. We've

0:08:13.880 --> 0:08:17.160
<v Speaker 1>always had small minded people who have wanted to blame

0:08:18.080 --> 0:08:22.600
<v Speaker 1>an ethnicity or a religious sect for their for their

0:08:22.640 --> 0:08:25.920
<v Speaker 1>own personal problems. That's in it, and that is that

0:08:26.000 --> 0:08:31.560
<v Speaker 1>is not new. Sometimes these sick people end up leaders

0:08:31.560 --> 0:08:37.520
<v Speaker 1>of countries see Hitler, Kama Adolph. Sometimes these sick leaders

0:08:37.600 --> 0:08:42.199
<v Speaker 1>end up leaders of political movements, and then there's always

0:08:42.200 --> 0:08:45.880
<v Speaker 1>this what about is that comes along with with folks

0:08:45.880 --> 0:08:49.760
<v Speaker 1>that are trying to defend their side from charges of

0:08:49.800 --> 0:08:54.920
<v Speaker 1>anti Semitism, and it'll be like, yeah, but you know, yeah,

0:08:54.960 --> 0:08:58.880
<v Speaker 1>but this disselected leader of Israel's bad about X, Y

0:08:59.000 --> 0:09:03.600
<v Speaker 1>and Z doesn't justify hate on little kids celebrating Hanukah

0:09:03.600 --> 0:09:09.360
<v Speaker 1>in Australia. There's nothing that justifies that. So I don't

0:09:09.360 --> 0:09:11.440
<v Speaker 1>want to hear the Abbots and I ignore. And I'll

0:09:11.440 --> 0:09:14.280
<v Speaker 1>tell you this, the beauty of social media and stories

0:09:14.280 --> 0:09:16.520
<v Speaker 1>like this is it becomes self selecting. You see the

0:09:16.559 --> 0:09:20.040
<v Speaker 1>people that immediately want to point fingers and say, aha,

0:09:20.120 --> 0:09:23.920
<v Speaker 1>it's the left, a hats the right, And I'm like, aha,

0:09:23.960 --> 0:09:26.959
<v Speaker 1>it's somebody that doesn't have a mirror in their own frickin' house.

0:09:28.520 --> 0:09:32.040
<v Speaker 1>But I want to put the emphasis on the distinguishing

0:09:32.360 --> 0:09:37.760
<v Speaker 1>characteristic here of this era of anti Semitism, and that

0:09:37.840 --> 0:09:38.559
<v Speaker 1>is social media.

0:09:39.840 --> 0:09:40.880
<v Speaker 2>I put my.

0:09:42.400 --> 0:09:46.040
<v Speaker 1>I want to align myself with some remarks that Spencer Cox,

0:09:46.080 --> 0:09:49.520
<v Speaker 1>the Governor of Utah, Republican governor of Utah said last week,

0:09:50.120 --> 0:09:52.680
<v Speaker 1>and it wasn't on a specific thing, wasn't specifically about

0:09:52.679 --> 0:09:56.160
<v Speaker 1>anti Semitism, but it was more about the toxicity, the

0:09:56.200 --> 0:10:01.480
<v Speaker 1>toxic culture, the increase in violence that we've seen in politics.

0:10:02.920 --> 0:10:05.440
<v Speaker 1>And what's interesting is, my friend Jonathan Martin Wright wrote

0:10:05.480 --> 0:10:09.680
<v Speaker 1>in Politico this week the following comment received the loudest applause.

0:10:09.720 --> 0:10:12.600
<v Speaker 1>He did a joint form with Josh Shapiro on this issue,

0:10:12.640 --> 0:10:15.240
<v Speaker 1>Spencer Cox and Josh Shapiro in conversation with my friend

0:10:16.320 --> 0:10:21.200
<v Speaker 1>Sabana Guthrie, and the loudest applause at the form was

0:10:21.200 --> 0:10:22.920
<v Speaker 1>when he said the following. If you want to be

0:10:22.920 --> 0:10:25.480
<v Speaker 1>angry at someone, be angry at the social media companies.

0:10:26.040 --> 0:10:29.560
<v Speaker 1>These are the wealthiest and most powerful companies in the

0:10:29.600 --> 0:10:31.760
<v Speaker 1>history of the world, and they're profiting off of destroying

0:10:31.760 --> 0:10:37.280
<v Speaker 1>our kids and destroying our country. And the amplification the algorithms,

0:10:37.320 --> 0:10:41.160
<v Speaker 1>the fact that fellow crazy anti semites can find other

0:10:41.240 --> 0:10:45.600
<v Speaker 1>fellow crazy anti semites online and think, oh, I'm not

0:10:45.679 --> 0:10:47.880
<v Speaker 1>the only one that thinks this. And the minute you

0:10:47.920 --> 0:10:50.079
<v Speaker 1>think you're not the only one, that you're not alone,

0:10:50.679 --> 0:10:54.560
<v Speaker 1>it somehow rationalizes, It makes you feel better. It makes

0:10:54.600 --> 0:10:56.839
<v Speaker 1>you think, oh, and then when you set up an

0:10:56.840 --> 0:11:01.280
<v Speaker 1>ecosystem and a bubble that sort of self reinforcing, you

0:11:01.360 --> 0:11:06.079
<v Speaker 1>think you're the mainstream. Everybody thinks their own media diet

0:11:06.120 --> 0:11:10.000
<v Speaker 1>is a mainstream diet, right. It is the inability of

0:11:10.040 --> 0:11:13.440
<v Speaker 1>so many people to put their feet in other people's

0:11:13.480 --> 0:11:17.480
<v Speaker 1>shoes and other people's media filters. In fact, I think

0:11:17.679 --> 0:11:21.600
<v Speaker 1>there's been some experiments. I really would like to see

0:11:22.120 --> 0:11:26.079
<v Speaker 1>people sort of spend a day in a media filter

0:11:26.120 --> 0:11:29.960
<v Speaker 1>of somebody else, and you do these various media filters

0:11:30.120 --> 0:11:32.679
<v Speaker 1>just you know, I look at it as an academic

0:11:32.800 --> 0:11:36.480
<v Speaker 1>exercise to try to understand the electorate. As you guys know,

0:11:36.240 --> 0:11:40.720
<v Speaker 1>I have been referring to myself as a political anthropologist,

0:11:41.880 --> 0:11:45.760
<v Speaker 1>meaning that I that is constantly what I'm ultimately always

0:11:45.760 --> 0:11:48.720
<v Speaker 1>trying to figure out is what is why are we

0:11:48.960 --> 0:11:51.480
<v Speaker 1>in this place? And if you're trying to figure out why,

0:11:51.559 --> 0:11:54.480
<v Speaker 1>you have to understand the various political tribes in America.

0:11:54.920 --> 0:11:58.320
<v Speaker 1>Some of these tribes overlap. People are members of multiple tribes,

0:11:58.360 --> 0:12:01.880
<v Speaker 1>sometimes a remember of only one. But ultimately that's why

0:12:01.880 --> 0:12:03.960
<v Speaker 1>I say I'm a political anthropologist. I'm trying to figure

0:12:03.960 --> 0:12:07.240
<v Speaker 1>out how do these tribes align? Hey, gress what I know,

0:12:07.280 --> 0:12:10.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm in my own tribe. I just try my best

0:12:10.320 --> 0:12:13.199
<v Speaker 1>to roll down the window in my bubble and see

0:12:13.200 --> 0:12:15.800
<v Speaker 1>what's going on outside of my bubble. But you have

0:12:15.880 --> 0:12:18.120
<v Speaker 1>to it is hard to do it. You have to

0:12:18.160 --> 0:12:21.040
<v Speaker 1>intentionally do it. You have to have the crazy ass

0:12:21.080 --> 0:12:23.240
<v Speaker 1>Twitter feed that I have. That I promise you most

0:12:23.320 --> 0:12:26.560
<v Speaker 1>people at America probably don't because I do try very

0:12:26.600 --> 0:12:30.080
<v Speaker 1>hard to get the normies and the extremes because I

0:12:30.120 --> 0:12:34.000
<v Speaker 1>want to understand what the conversation that is going on.

0:12:34.120 --> 0:12:36.640
<v Speaker 1>Trust me, I'm sure some of you go. Some of

0:12:36.640 --> 0:12:39.480
<v Speaker 1>you listening to me wouldn't even know who Candice Owens is.

0:12:40.120 --> 0:12:42.079
<v Speaker 1>And by the way, God bless you, I'd love not

0:12:42.200 --> 0:12:46.400
<v Speaker 1>to know who this woman is. But there are people,

0:12:46.840 --> 0:12:49.880
<v Speaker 1>there's an entire community on the right that is consumed

0:12:49.920 --> 0:12:54.720
<v Speaker 1>with trying to extricate this crazy woman from the mainstream

0:12:54.960 --> 0:12:59.840
<v Speaker 1>of the MAGA world because of her just outlandish conspiracy theories.

0:13:00.520 --> 0:13:03.760
<v Speaker 1>I can't tell if she's mentally ill or just simply

0:13:04.320 --> 0:13:07.320
<v Speaker 1>a shameless grifter, or perhaps the two of the two

0:13:07.360 --> 0:13:11.120
<v Speaker 1>go hand in hand. But there are plenty of people

0:13:11.160 --> 0:13:13.520
<v Speaker 1>in mainstream America. I'm sure if I said the words

0:13:13.559 --> 0:13:16.000
<v Speaker 1>Candice owned, my mother and my brother in law, my

0:13:16.000 --> 0:13:18.520
<v Speaker 1>sister in law, who all are pretty pretty smart about this.

0:13:18.520 --> 0:13:19.480
<v Speaker 2>Would be like, who the hell is that?

0:13:20.679 --> 0:13:24.000
<v Speaker 1>And I wouldn't blame them. But that's because this is

0:13:24.040 --> 0:13:26.640
<v Speaker 1>the world that we've all constructed, but it's the world

0:13:26.679 --> 0:13:30.120
<v Speaker 1>that social media has gone out of their way to construct.

0:13:30.160 --> 0:13:32.520
<v Speaker 1>And this is why, you know, I look at this

0:13:32.720 --> 0:13:34.880
<v Speaker 1>rise of anti Semitism, and I look the fact that

0:13:34.960 --> 0:13:38.439
<v Speaker 1>this was not a lone nut right, but there appears

0:13:38.440 --> 0:13:44.120
<v Speaker 1>to be some coordination down there in Australia. I do

0:13:44.240 --> 0:13:48.480
<v Speaker 1>I can't, you know, I know that ultimately individuals are

0:13:48.480 --> 0:13:51.960
<v Speaker 1>to blame, not a computer, not an algorithm, but these

0:13:51.960 --> 0:13:57.400
<v Speaker 1>tech platforms amplify, and you know, I you know they

0:13:57.440 --> 0:14:02.079
<v Speaker 1>I think they have a responsibility to make sure that

0:14:02.120 --> 0:14:04.960
<v Speaker 1>what they're doing is not putting more people in harm's way.

0:14:05.600 --> 0:14:10.920
<v Speaker 1>And their amplification, their algorithms, are doing just that, they

0:14:10.920 --> 0:14:14.000
<v Speaker 1>deserve no protection on Section two thirty, the part of

0:14:14.000 --> 0:14:16.240
<v Speaker 1>the law that supposedly says, hey, we're just you know,

0:14:16.640 --> 0:14:18.960
<v Speaker 1>we're not doing the minute they put an algorithm on

0:14:19.000 --> 0:14:21.880
<v Speaker 1>these things, the minute they amplify, the minute they allow

0:14:22.000 --> 0:14:25.280
<v Speaker 1>for the connection. Look, our First Amendment guarantees free speech.

0:14:25.360 --> 0:14:30.800
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't guarantee of bullhorn, it doesn't guarantee a right

0:14:30.960 --> 0:14:32.840
<v Speaker 1>to be the loudest voice in the room. It just

0:14:32.880 --> 0:14:35.080
<v Speaker 1>simply guarantees that you have a right to free speech.

0:14:36.360 --> 0:14:39.120
<v Speaker 1>So you have a right to be a hateful anti

0:14:39.120 --> 0:14:43.920
<v Speaker 1>semi okay, But you don't have the right to have

0:14:44.920 --> 0:14:50.240
<v Speaker 1>your extreme, hateful and hurtful political views be the dominant

0:14:50.280 --> 0:14:55.400
<v Speaker 1>piece of conversation and be mainstreamed into America. No, because,

0:14:55.400 --> 0:14:57.920
<v Speaker 1>by the way, we don't want it mainstreamed. And the

0:14:57.960 --> 0:15:02.360
<v Speaker 1>tech companies do not have to protect you and do

0:15:02.440 --> 0:15:04.720
<v Speaker 1>not have to amplify your speech. In fact, they can

0:15:04.760 --> 0:15:07.440
<v Speaker 1>dial it down. In fact, there's plenty of academic studies

0:15:07.440 --> 0:15:10.800
<v Speaker 1>that show if you dial down hateful content, you're not

0:15:10.840 --> 0:15:14.160
<v Speaker 1>getting rid of it, you're just prioritizing it less than

0:15:14.160 --> 0:15:19.960
<v Speaker 1>these algorithms. It's shocking how much turning that temperature down

0:15:20.520 --> 0:15:28.680
<v Speaker 1>actually helps the conversation. So it's troubling, but I really,

0:15:29.720 --> 0:15:33.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, you look at the situation we're in, and

0:15:33.440 --> 0:15:35.960
<v Speaker 1>there's no doubt we have bad leaders around the world

0:15:36.120 --> 0:15:40.360
<v Speaker 1>that are exploiting hate and anger to try to make

0:15:40.400 --> 0:15:43.960
<v Speaker 1>a political argument. You have people on both sides of

0:15:43.960 --> 0:15:49.600
<v Speaker 1>the aisle attempting to weaponize anger at Israel or anger

0:15:49.800 --> 0:15:55.560
<v Speaker 1>at the economy and trying to somehow connect that to

0:15:55.640 --> 0:16:00.200
<v Speaker 1>Jewish folks. The left does it with bb at times.

0:16:00.200 --> 0:16:03.320
<v Speaker 1>The right does it with George Soros. I mean, George Soros.

0:16:03.360 --> 0:16:07.320
<v Speaker 1>There is no greater victim, there's no greater victim of

0:16:07.400 --> 0:16:13.640
<v Speaker 1>anti Semitic mythology, h and gross mischaracterizations than George Soros.

0:16:14.640 --> 0:16:16.040
<v Speaker 1>And I don't know where he gets to go to

0:16:16.040 --> 0:16:19.400
<v Speaker 1>get his reputation back considering the character assassinations that have

0:16:19.480 --> 0:16:23.960
<v Speaker 1>taken place through the prism of his faith. There's there's

0:16:24.000 --> 0:16:26.760
<v Speaker 1>no no, no doubt in my mind on that front.

0:16:28.080 --> 0:16:32.240
<v Speaker 1>But ultimately, why do we have more collective conversation about this?

0:16:32.320 --> 0:16:35.080
<v Speaker 1>Why is there more collective talk about this? Why is

0:16:35.120 --> 0:16:41.040
<v Speaker 1>there frankly more insecurity for many Jewish Jewish people around

0:16:41.040 --> 0:16:43.560
<v Speaker 1>the world. Why do we feel so less secure today

0:16:43.560 --> 0:16:47.440
<v Speaker 1>than we ever have before? I think we can thank

0:16:47.560 --> 0:16:50.320
<v Speaker 1>social media. I think the tech companies have not only

0:16:52.200 --> 0:16:56.400
<v Speaker 1>not gotten the focus of this, they've not taken responsibility,

0:16:56.440 --> 0:16:59.560
<v Speaker 1>but I think they need They need to be the

0:16:59.600 --> 0:17:02.160
<v Speaker 1>focal Which brings me to that column that my friend

0:17:02.240 --> 0:17:05.120
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan Martin wrote, which he says, you know, perhaps Spencer

0:17:05.160 --> 0:17:09.200
<v Speaker 1>Cox needs to be the anti tech candidate. Somebody needs

0:17:09.280 --> 0:17:12.840
<v Speaker 1>to take it to the tech community, right. The tech

0:17:12.840 --> 0:17:16.400
<v Speaker 1>community has brought us a lot of positives. Okay, there's

0:17:16.440 --> 0:17:19.280
<v Speaker 1>a ton of positives, and there's a ton of tools

0:17:19.280 --> 0:17:21.959
<v Speaker 1>that have been invented that have helped me create a

0:17:22.000 --> 0:17:26.880
<v Speaker 1>better communications system with you guys. Right, there's no doubt

0:17:26.920 --> 0:17:30.400
<v Speaker 1>there's plenty of upsides from the tech community, but what

0:17:30.480 --> 0:17:33.080
<v Speaker 1>they have done with social media, and this is why

0:17:34.440 --> 0:17:36.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't think the public is going to be supportive

0:17:36.720 --> 0:17:40.679
<v Speaker 1>at all of this light touch, non regulatory process that

0:17:40.720 --> 0:17:45.760
<v Speaker 1>the President's trying to do an artificial intelligence. The same industry,

0:17:45.800 --> 0:17:49.160
<v Speaker 1>the same industry that gave us social media without regulation,

0:17:49.680 --> 0:17:55.159
<v Speaker 1>now wants to give us artificial intelligence without regulation. Considering

0:17:55.200 --> 0:17:58.879
<v Speaker 1>how well social media went, how the hell are we

0:17:59.000 --> 0:18:03.479
<v Speaker 1>doing this, right, This is the most illogical thing you

0:18:03.480 --> 0:18:07.159
<v Speaker 1>could come up with. I can't believe the president is

0:18:07.240 --> 0:18:09.400
<v Speaker 1>doing this. I think this is you want to talk

0:18:09.440 --> 0:18:13.920
<v Speaker 1>about convincing more mainstream Americans to go get a pitch

0:18:13.960 --> 0:18:18.560
<v Speaker 1>for it and start sharpening up, sharpening that sucker up.

0:18:19.680 --> 0:18:22.440
<v Speaker 1>It is just crazy that we don't want to put

0:18:22.440 --> 0:18:26.880
<v Speaker 1>any guardrails on the growth and expansion of the AI industry.

0:18:27.160 --> 0:18:34.520
<v Speaker 1>It is absolute insanity. Okay, if you think social media

0:18:34.520 --> 0:18:38.159
<v Speaker 1>created more toxicity in our culture and more violence in

0:18:38.200 --> 0:18:41.240
<v Speaker 1>our culture thanks to the lack of regulation, what do

0:18:41.280 --> 0:18:44.040
<v Speaker 1>you think is going to happen with artificial intelligence if

0:18:44.040 --> 0:18:47.879
<v Speaker 1>we don't have some attempt at making sure there are

0:18:47.960 --> 0:18:52.080
<v Speaker 1>constant guardrails being erected as we build this super highway.

0:18:53.680 --> 0:18:57.200
<v Speaker 1>It is it is something that I think is I've

0:18:57.520 --> 0:19:01.600
<v Speaker 1>talked about this before. I think it is politically absolutely

0:19:03.800 --> 0:19:06.919
<v Speaker 1>going to be frankly an easy thing to exploit potentially,

0:19:07.640 --> 0:19:10.480
<v Speaker 1>And that's why the tech community is really making a

0:19:10.520 --> 0:19:16.239
<v Speaker 1>mistake here that they are not grasping just in what

0:19:16.320 --> 0:19:18.560
<v Speaker 1>kind of precarious position that they're in. And maybe they

0:19:18.560 --> 0:19:21.600
<v Speaker 1>think we don't need America and if America shuts us down,

0:19:21.600 --> 0:19:24.600
<v Speaker 1>we'll just go somewhere else where we will be treated

0:19:24.760 --> 0:19:27.399
<v Speaker 1>with lot. We can just buy our way into a

0:19:27.440 --> 0:19:30.159
<v Speaker 1>policy that we want. And obviously, right now we have

0:19:30.200 --> 0:19:32.479
<v Speaker 1>a situation where they can get whatever the hell they

0:19:32.520 --> 0:19:35.000
<v Speaker 1>want from this administration if they just write a check.

0:19:35.840 --> 0:19:39.560
<v Speaker 1>And that's disturbing, but that's why we still have a

0:19:40.720 --> 0:19:43.439
<v Speaker 1>competitive democracy, although I'm going to get to that in

0:19:43.440 --> 0:19:48.679
<v Speaker 1>a minute, where the voters can sort of have a

0:19:48.720 --> 0:19:51.600
<v Speaker 1>say in this, because right now we have zero say

0:19:52.240 --> 0:19:56.240
<v Speaker 1>in what social media has done to us, and we

0:19:56.400 --> 0:19:58.320
<v Speaker 1>don't seem to have the collective will.

0:19:58.480 --> 0:19:59.040
<v Speaker 2>It's growing.

0:19:59.480 --> 0:20:02.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean, look, I think it's a huge start that

0:20:02.440 --> 0:20:05.160
<v Speaker 1>you've got. I mean, look, Australia is trying to ban

0:20:05.280 --> 0:20:09.080
<v Speaker 1>social media for people under the age of sixteen. Spencer

0:20:09.119 --> 0:20:12.640
<v Speaker 1>Cock made this. Cox made this mention that we wait

0:20:12.800 --> 0:20:14.680
<v Speaker 1>to hand the keys to a car to a kid

0:20:14.760 --> 0:20:18.960
<v Speaker 1>until sixteen, yet we give them an algorithmic driven phone

0:20:19.000 --> 0:20:21.879
<v Speaker 1>at twelve. You know, perhaps we can give them a

0:20:21.880 --> 0:20:23.800
<v Speaker 1>phone at twelve with no social media on it.

0:20:23.920 --> 0:20:25.120
<v Speaker 2>Right, maybe it's.

0:20:24.960 --> 0:20:29.119
<v Speaker 1>Flip phones from twelve to sixteen, because plenty of parents

0:20:29.400 --> 0:20:31.720
<v Speaker 1>want to have some access to their kids and all that.

0:20:31.840 --> 0:20:35.320
<v Speaker 1>I think that that's a legitimate concern. But you know,

0:20:36.000 --> 0:20:40.119
<v Speaker 1>we can essentially say, you know, no, just you can't

0:20:40.160 --> 0:20:41.960
<v Speaker 1>have a you know, because I don't know how else

0:20:42.000 --> 0:20:44.080
<v Speaker 1>you're going to be able to monitor this. But if

0:20:44.080 --> 0:20:50.040
<v Speaker 1>you actually just make the device itself against the law

0:20:50.080 --> 0:20:52.680
<v Speaker 1>for somebody under the age of sixteen to have that,

0:20:52.680 --> 0:20:55.760
<v Speaker 1>that might be a start. It is the one area

0:20:56.000 --> 0:20:59.280
<v Speaker 1>where we're starting to see some bipartisan consensus, which is

0:20:59.440 --> 0:21:04.800
<v Speaker 1>about access to screens and social media for people under sixteen.

0:21:05.200 --> 0:21:08.360
<v Speaker 1>And we've decided this is a problem. Well, guess what

0:21:08.560 --> 0:21:12.080
<v Speaker 1>do you think that our minds are only fragile from

0:21:12.160 --> 0:21:16.240
<v Speaker 1>sixteen and younger, or that we've got these fragile minds

0:21:16.280 --> 0:21:18.600
<v Speaker 1>that are much older too, and that social media warps

0:21:18.640 --> 0:21:22.520
<v Speaker 1>those warps those over the age of sixteen almost as

0:21:22.680 --> 0:21:25.480
<v Speaker 1>badly as they could warp those under the age of twelve.

0:21:25.640 --> 0:21:28.160
<v Speaker 1>One other point in the social media front, Jonathan mentioned

0:21:28.200 --> 0:21:34.159
<v Speaker 1>an interesting new report that noted about. It was a

0:21:34.200 --> 0:21:37.920
<v Speaker 1>pole about the manosphere, if you will, what do Men Want?

0:21:37.960 --> 0:21:40.480
<v Speaker 1>And it revealed that a majority of males sampled in

0:21:40.520 --> 0:21:43.400
<v Speaker 1>that survey said social media feeds have gotten a lot

0:21:43.440 --> 0:21:45.320
<v Speaker 1>more extreme. I mean, most of this is thanks to

0:21:45.320 --> 0:21:47.800
<v Speaker 1>Elon Musk and his insanity and what he's done to

0:21:47.840 --> 0:21:51.159
<v Speaker 1>acts and taking away all guardrails on acts, And of

0:21:51.200 --> 0:21:54.240
<v Speaker 1>course every other social media company followed because they didn't

0:21:54.240 --> 0:21:57.440
<v Speaker 1>want to get left behind. But what's interesting is that

0:21:57.480 --> 0:22:01.280
<v Speaker 1>men themselves revealed in this pole that most controversial content

0:22:01.359 --> 0:22:05.119
<v Speaker 1>reaches the men who are online the most, especially younger men,

0:22:05.400 --> 0:22:09.159
<v Speaker 1>white men, black men, Hispanic men across the board. And

0:22:09.240 --> 0:22:14.960
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing a more radical youth thanks to warped social

0:22:15.080 --> 0:22:17.800
<v Speaker 1>media algorithms. So when we see this rise of hate,

0:22:17.840 --> 0:22:20.760
<v Speaker 1>we see this rise of violence, and we're looking, you know,

0:22:21.440 --> 0:22:23.440
<v Speaker 1>the easy thing is to try to point left, point

0:22:23.560 --> 0:22:26.480
<v Speaker 1>right point at Israel point, Gad's a point, at Hama's

0:22:26.480 --> 0:22:28.560
<v Speaker 1>point of protesters, people want to point at a whole

0:22:28.560 --> 0:22:32.080
<v Speaker 1>bunch of figures except for the culprit that is in

0:22:32.240 --> 0:22:36.360
<v Speaker 1>charge of the information ecosystem that destroyed the information ecosystem.

0:22:36.600 --> 0:22:39.080
<v Speaker 1>And trust me, I'm aware of the irony that I

0:22:39.080 --> 0:22:42.719
<v Speaker 1>am speaking to you in that ecosystem, and hopefully it

0:22:42.760 --> 0:22:45.240
<v Speaker 1>gets to you. It doesn't get shut down by the

0:22:45.280 --> 0:22:48.400
<v Speaker 1>algorithms of these big tech companies. But they're the culprits here.

0:22:48.720 --> 0:22:51.520
<v Speaker 1>They've created this environment that has made it a lot

0:22:51.560 --> 0:22:56.560
<v Speaker 1>easier for these hateful, awful, mentally ill people to find

0:22:56.680 --> 0:23:01.760
<v Speaker 1>comfort in their bubbles because it looks like they're not

0:23:01.880 --> 0:23:10.520
<v Speaker 1>alone and that they're somehow namestream. Having good life insurance

0:23:10.640 --> 0:23:14.240
<v Speaker 1>is incredibly important. I know from personal experience. I was

0:23:14.280 --> 0:23:17.480
<v Speaker 1>sixteen when my father passed away. We didn't have any money.

0:23:17.600 --> 0:23:20.000
<v Speaker 1>He didn't leave us in the best shape. My mother,

0:23:20.200 --> 0:23:24.200
<v Speaker 1>single mother, now widow, myself sixteen trying to figure out

0:23:24.240 --> 0:23:26.119
<v Speaker 1>how am I going to pay for college and lo

0:23:26.280 --> 0:23:29.560
<v Speaker 1>and behold, my dad had one life insurance policy that

0:23:29.600 --> 0:23:32.600
<v Speaker 1>we found wasn't a lot, but it was important at

0:23:32.600 --> 0:23:35.600
<v Speaker 1>the time, and it's why I was able to go

0:23:35.760 --> 0:23:38.880
<v Speaker 1>to college. Little did he know how important that would

0:23:38.880 --> 0:23:40.399
<v Speaker 1>be in that moment.

0:23:41.160 --> 0:23:41.879
<v Speaker 2>Well, guess what.

0:23:42.160 --> 0:23:44.639
<v Speaker 1>That's why I am here to tell you about Etho's life.

0:23:45.080 --> 0:23:47.440
<v Speaker 1>They can provide you with peace of mind knowing your

0:23:47.480 --> 0:23:50.800
<v Speaker 1>family is protected even if the worst comes to pass.

0:23:51.160 --> 0:23:54.400
<v Speaker 1>Ethos is an online platform that makes getting life insurance

0:23:54.440 --> 0:23:57.520
<v Speaker 1>fast and easy, all designed to protect your family's future

0:23:57.560 --> 0:24:01.120
<v Speaker 1>in minutes, not months. There's no complic process and it's

0:24:01.240 --> 0:24:05.440
<v Speaker 1>one hundred percent online. There's no medical exam require you

0:24:05.520 --> 0:24:07.959
<v Speaker 1>just answer a few health questions online. You can get

0:24:08.000 --> 0:24:09.760
<v Speaker 1>a quote in as little as ten minutes, and you

0:24:09.760 --> 0:24:13.520
<v Speaker 1>can get same day coverage without ever leaving your home.

0:24:14.200 --> 0:24:16.080
<v Speaker 1>You can get up to three million dollars in coverage

0:24:16.080 --> 0:24:18.159
<v Speaker 1>and some policies start as low as two dollars a

0:24:18.200 --> 0:24:21.480
<v Speaker 1>day that would be billed monthly. As of March twenty

0:24:21.520 --> 0:24:24.520
<v Speaker 1>twenty five, Business Insider named Ethos the number one no

0:24:24.640 --> 0:24:29.040
<v Speaker 1>medical exam instant life insurance provider. So protect your family

0:24:29.520 --> 0:24:32.320
<v Speaker 1>with life insurance from Ethos. Get your free quote at

0:24:32.320 --> 0:24:36.600
<v Speaker 1>ethos dot com slash chuck. So again, that's Ethos dot

0:24:36.640 --> 0:24:41.240
<v Speaker 1>com slash chuck. Application times may vary and the rates

0:24:41.280 --> 0:24:44.640
<v Speaker 1>themselves may vary as well, but trust me, life insurance

0:24:44.680 --> 0:24:47.399
<v Speaker 1>is something you should really think about it, especially if

0:24:47.440 --> 0:24:53.159
<v Speaker 1>you've got a growing family. I want to pivot quickly

0:24:53.240 --> 0:24:56.960
<v Speaker 1>to my Newsphere interview this week because some alarming new

0:24:57.040 --> 0:24:59.720
<v Speaker 1>facts that I had not seen anywhere else from Mark.

0:25:00.080 --> 0:25:02.280
<v Speaker 1>He's the vice chair of the Senate Intel Committee. Mark

0:25:02.280 --> 0:25:07.040
<v Speaker 1>Warner has seen the second He has seen the video

0:25:07.119 --> 0:25:13.480
<v Speaker 1>of both the September second second strike on those survivors

0:25:13.480 --> 0:25:16.400
<v Speaker 1>from the first strike of the boats off the coast

0:25:16.400 --> 0:25:19.080
<v Speaker 1>of Venezuela, and he revealed two facts that I had

0:25:19.080 --> 0:25:22.639
<v Speaker 1>not seen anywhere. Fact number one is that the time

0:25:23.440 --> 0:25:25.800
<v Speaker 1>that elapsed between the first strike and the second strike

0:25:26.280 --> 0:25:29.840
<v Speaker 1>was somewhere between thirty and forty minutes because of cloud cover,

0:25:30.680 --> 0:25:34.000
<v Speaker 1>so thirty to forty minutes. And then the clouds come up,

0:25:34.040 --> 0:25:36.919
<v Speaker 1>and then apparently what is revealed, according to Senator Warner,

0:25:38.200 --> 0:25:45.320
<v Speaker 1>was not fully clothed survivors clinging to their life. And

0:25:45.359 --> 0:25:49.880
<v Speaker 1>then the second strike. Let's just say this is what look.

0:25:49.920 --> 0:25:53.160
<v Speaker 1>He believes that if Americans see this video, they will

0:25:53.200 --> 0:25:56.680
<v Speaker 1>be appalled. There will be and there's a reason why

0:25:56.680 --> 0:25:59.200
<v Speaker 1>the Pentagon is fighting the release of this video. There

0:25:59.280 --> 0:26:02.240
<v Speaker 1>is no defense there apparently is going to be no

0:26:02.280 --> 0:26:05.760
<v Speaker 1>defense of what this video looks like. This is appalling,

0:26:05.840 --> 0:26:09.760
<v Speaker 1>and there are probably going to be concerns that there

0:26:09.800 --> 0:26:13.680
<v Speaker 1>are people that might have legal jeopardy here, but realistically,

0:26:14.240 --> 0:26:16.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't know where you get the legal jeopardy when

0:26:16.080 --> 0:26:21.040
<v Speaker 1>the president will likely just pardon anybody that is investigated.

0:26:21.080 --> 0:26:26.879
<v Speaker 1>But there's a reason people are fighting very hard not

0:26:26.960 --> 0:26:30.480
<v Speaker 1>to release this second video because if what is what

0:26:30.560 --> 0:26:36.000
<v Speaker 1>Warner described to me a delayed thirty to forty minutes

0:26:37.119 --> 0:26:42.000
<v Speaker 1>and they were not fully clothed, Essentially, just put yourself

0:26:42.000 --> 0:26:46.160
<v Speaker 1>for the situation. Your boat explode, You're alive, you're swimming,

0:26:46.240 --> 0:26:50.400
<v Speaker 1>You're clinging to the remnants of a boat in order

0:26:50.440 --> 0:26:55.760
<v Speaker 1>to stay afloat not drown. Half your clothes are gone

0:26:56.000 --> 0:26:58.679
<v Speaker 1>been blown off. Maybe you're just sort of trying to

0:26:58.800 --> 0:27:05.520
<v Speaker 1>use and we decide to use the second shot. No

0:27:05.640 --> 0:27:08.399
<v Speaker 1>wonder there are questions why the phrase war crime is

0:27:08.440 --> 0:27:12.920
<v Speaker 1>being tossed around although we're not at war, because you know,

0:27:13.200 --> 0:27:18.359
<v Speaker 1>as many a person has pointed out, the question is

0:27:18.440 --> 0:27:21.399
<v Speaker 1>whether there is not whether this second strike was legal,

0:27:22.080 --> 0:27:24.840
<v Speaker 1>But we still have real doubts about whether the first

0:27:24.880 --> 0:27:27.520
<v Speaker 1>strike is legal, and it is worth noting that earlier

0:27:27.560 --> 0:27:32.080
<v Speaker 1>this week. Earlier last week, Trump offered a veiled threat

0:27:32.080 --> 0:27:35.280
<v Speaker 1>at Columbia because the president of Columbia has been critical

0:27:35.320 --> 0:27:38.800
<v Speaker 1>of this, saying that he might not be out of

0:27:38.840 --> 0:27:42.440
<v Speaker 1>the crosshairs. And then the President has said that they

0:27:42.520 --> 0:27:46.919
<v Speaker 1>might target some of these folks on land. Whose land

0:27:47.520 --> 0:27:52.000
<v Speaker 1>is it? Venezuela is a Colombia. Where's this headed? And

0:27:52.080 --> 0:27:56.399
<v Speaker 1>again there is no Senator Warner could not give me

0:27:58.640 --> 0:28:03.800
<v Speaker 1>the authority that he could not explain very well the

0:28:03.880 --> 0:28:07.600
<v Speaker 1>authority that the White House was using that they claim

0:28:07.680 --> 0:28:12.040
<v Speaker 1>these strikes were legal. I mean, they've cited an authority.

0:28:12.080 --> 0:28:15.440
<v Speaker 1>It's not the if you're wondering what Senator Warner said,

0:28:15.440 --> 0:28:19.879
<v Speaker 1>it is not the au MF that was passed by

0:28:19.920 --> 0:28:25.919
<v Speaker 1>Congress that allowed for the invasion of Iraq, but and

0:28:26.119 --> 0:28:28.800
<v Speaker 1>which has been used, which was used by Obama as

0:28:29.000 --> 0:28:32.520
<v Speaker 1>justification for strikes, and I believe Yemen in some other places,

0:28:32.560 --> 0:28:35.840
<v Speaker 1>So that is not there. So we still don't have

0:28:35.880 --> 0:28:39.600
<v Speaker 1>a clear picture of the legal authority the White House

0:28:39.680 --> 0:28:42.479
<v Speaker 1>is claiming to go after these folks. But he has

0:28:42.600 --> 0:28:47.880
<v Speaker 1>threatened land strikes without asking for any authority from Congress

0:28:47.880 --> 0:28:50.080
<v Speaker 1>and additional authority from Congress, nor has he made his

0:28:50.120 --> 0:28:51.240
<v Speaker 1>case to the American public.

0:28:52.200 --> 0:28:53.520
<v Speaker 2>And by the way.

0:28:53.720 --> 0:28:58.240
<v Speaker 1>The decision to essentially commandeer an oil tanker rather than

0:28:58.320 --> 0:29:00.480
<v Speaker 1>just blow it up, although blowing up an oil tanker

0:29:00.520 --> 0:29:04.880
<v Speaker 1>would have been catastrophic, you know, essentially starting a fire

0:29:05.000 --> 0:29:09.200
<v Speaker 1>on the Pacific Ocean potentially or the Caribbean Sea depending

0:29:09.240 --> 0:29:13.200
<v Speaker 1>on where they were hitting this tanker. But if we

0:29:13.320 --> 0:29:15.840
<v Speaker 1>can board a tanker, we could have boarded these boats.

0:29:15.840 --> 0:29:18.480
<v Speaker 1>And I think the decision not to attack that tanker

0:29:18.520 --> 0:29:23.720
<v Speaker 1>and simply to just commandeer it under totally undermines the

0:29:23.840 --> 0:29:28.520
<v Speaker 1>rationale and justification of the strikes themselves. Why there is

0:29:28.640 --> 0:29:34.040
<v Speaker 1>no good explanation for why we're not just essentially stopping

0:29:34.040 --> 0:29:38.479
<v Speaker 1>these boats, grabbing these people and getting some intelligence so

0:29:38.480 --> 0:29:41.400
<v Speaker 1>that we can actually learn something. And I want to

0:29:41.440 --> 0:29:44.640
<v Speaker 1>just keep one thing in mind here, just one more

0:29:44.680 --> 0:29:47.560
<v Speaker 1>thing in mind, which is the president's political standing is

0:29:47.600 --> 0:29:51.440
<v Speaker 1>not great. He has had a terrible month. He had

0:29:51.480 --> 0:29:55.240
<v Speaker 1>a terrible Friday, excuse me, Thursday last week when his

0:29:55.400 --> 0:29:59.560
<v Speaker 1>retribution campaign. You know, basically he's the Emperor with no clothes.

0:29:59.600 --> 0:30:02.760
<v Speaker 1>As far as Indiana Republicans are concerned, Grand Juries in

0:30:02.840 --> 0:30:06.320
<v Speaker 1>Virginia are not might want to indict at Ham Sanders,

0:30:06.400 --> 0:30:11.760
<v Speaker 1>but they won't indict Leticia James. When he's not feeling.

0:30:11.840 --> 0:30:14.640
<v Speaker 1>When he feels as if things are going bad, that's

0:30:14.800 --> 0:30:18.920
<v Speaker 1>just when he might do crazier stuff and might attempt

0:30:18.960 --> 0:30:22.280
<v Speaker 1>crazier stuff to either change the subject or change the picture.

0:30:22.840 --> 0:30:25.600
<v Speaker 1>One more thing before I get to an important essay

0:30:25.640 --> 0:30:28.760
<v Speaker 1>that I think you guys have to make note of

0:30:29.480 --> 0:30:30.000
<v Speaker 1>the president.

0:30:30.080 --> 0:30:31.680
<v Speaker 2>It is notable to me that the President did.

0:30:31.560 --> 0:30:34.080
<v Speaker 1>An interview with the Wall Street Journal over the weekend,

0:30:34.440 --> 0:30:38.320
<v Speaker 1>and the most fascinating aspect of it was his tone change.

0:30:38.360 --> 0:30:41.480
<v Speaker 1>He essentially is admitting that he's going to lose the

0:30:41.520 --> 0:30:46.600
<v Speaker 1>mid terms. He said, you know, he basically said, we're

0:30:46.600 --> 0:30:48.840
<v Speaker 1>going to try our best to win. We'll see what happens.

0:30:48.880 --> 0:30:51.120
<v Speaker 1>We should win, but you know, statistically it's very tough

0:30:51.120 --> 0:30:53.800
<v Speaker 1>to win. Yeah, I know, it doesn't make sense. So

0:30:53.800 --> 0:30:56.920
<v Speaker 1>it's the beginning of the excuse making. It's the beginning

0:30:56.960 --> 0:31:00.280
<v Speaker 1>of his way of admitting this economy, that the public

0:31:00.320 --> 0:31:03.600
<v Speaker 1>doesn't like this economy. This was the interview saying, Oh,

0:31:03.600 --> 0:31:06.600
<v Speaker 1>it's going to take time, my investments haven't gone through.

0:31:07.920 --> 0:31:08.840
<v Speaker 2>It will happen.

0:31:10.160 --> 0:31:13.120
<v Speaker 1>Just be patient, and as he said, hopefully it happens

0:31:13.120 --> 0:31:16.600
<v Speaker 1>before the election, but it's notable, right. He went from

0:31:16.640 --> 0:31:19.680
<v Speaker 1>this is a hoax two weeks ago to at least

0:31:19.720 --> 0:31:23.440
<v Speaker 1>in this interview with the Wall Street Journal, sort of

0:31:23.480 --> 0:31:26.880
<v Speaker 1>accepting the premise. Yes, we realized the public doesn't feel

0:31:26.880 --> 0:31:28.320
<v Speaker 1>it or see it yet, but they will.

0:31:28.440 --> 0:31:30.160
<v Speaker 2>But they will, he promises. He swears.

0:31:31.320 --> 0:31:34.160
<v Speaker 1>These are these stages. We should call it stages of

0:31:34.200 --> 0:31:36.560
<v Speaker 1>political It's not quite political grief, but it's sort of like,

0:31:36.800 --> 0:31:40.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, first there's a dial right, then there's you know,

0:31:40.720 --> 0:31:45.200
<v Speaker 1>somehow your argumentative. Then there's a form of acceptance. He's

0:31:45.360 --> 0:31:47.680
<v Speaker 1>getting into the form of acceptance, but he's not accepting

0:31:47.720 --> 0:31:50.160
<v Speaker 1>the premise that his policies are a problem. He's just

0:31:50.160 --> 0:31:51.760
<v Speaker 1>simply saying his policies haven't.

0:31:51.600 --> 0:31:52.280
<v Speaker 2>Kicked in yet.

0:31:52.760 --> 0:31:55.040
<v Speaker 1>In that sense, he's no different than any other president

0:31:55.080 --> 0:31:56.320
<v Speaker 1>trying to defend a bad economy.

0:31:56.320 --> 0:31:57.000
<v Speaker 2>No, no, no, no.

0:31:56.840 --> 0:31:59.280
<v Speaker 1>My policies haven't kicked in yet. It's always my policies

0:31:59.320 --> 0:32:01.960
<v Speaker 1>haven't kicked in yet. I'm dealing with the predecessor's policies.

0:32:03.280 --> 0:32:06.240
<v Speaker 1>So that says it's a familiar pattern. Perhaps the best

0:32:06.280 --> 0:32:09.320
<v Speaker 1>part of that Wall Street Journal interview was the fact

0:32:09.360 --> 0:32:11.239
<v Speaker 1>that you know he's doing the interview with the Wall

0:32:11.240 --> 0:32:13.959
<v Speaker 1>Street Turnal reporters. But he's taking calls and doing all

0:32:14.000 --> 0:32:16.960
<v Speaker 1>sorts of stuff at the same time. Right, And here's

0:32:16.960 --> 0:32:18.959
<v Speaker 1>the I'm going to read directly from the article. At

0:32:18.960 --> 0:32:21.000
<v Speaker 1>one point, the President, sitting at the resolute desk with

0:32:21.000 --> 0:32:23.280
<v Speaker 1>a glittering Christmas tree at its side, asked an aid

0:32:23.280 --> 0:32:25.360
<v Speaker 1>to show him the latest market data. He took calls

0:32:25.360 --> 0:32:27.800
<v Speaker 1>from friends and allies multiple times during the interview, including

0:32:27.920 --> 0:32:31.000
<v Speaker 1>from Interior Secretary Doug Bergham, who joined by speakerphone to

0:32:31.000 --> 0:32:34.320
<v Speaker 1>discuss the administration's plans for Washington, d C.

0:32:34.520 --> 0:32:35.840
<v Speaker 2>Area public golf courses.

0:32:35.960 --> 0:32:40.479
<v Speaker 1>That is right, the President seems to not be worried

0:32:40.520 --> 0:32:43.840
<v Speaker 1>about the price of groceries as much as he's worried

0:32:43.880 --> 0:32:48.680
<v Speaker 1>about the designs and who's in charge of redesigning Washington

0:32:48.760 --> 0:32:52.400
<v Speaker 1>D C's three public golf courses, Rock Creek Park, Haynes

0:32:52.440 --> 0:32:53.320
<v Speaker 1>Point in Langston.

0:32:56.520 --> 0:32:57.720
<v Speaker 2>I mean, if you're.

0:32:57.600 --> 0:33:02.400
<v Speaker 1>Trying to hand democrats, it's easier fodder to say, you know,

0:33:03.160 --> 0:33:07.280
<v Speaker 1>he promised this, to focus, laser focus on this and this,

0:33:07.400 --> 0:33:11.200
<v Speaker 1>and instead he cares about building a ballroom, changing the

0:33:11.280 --> 0:33:19.240
<v Speaker 1>name of the Kennedy Center, singing YMCA, and redesigning Washington,

0:33:19.280 --> 0:33:23.320
<v Speaker 1>d C's golf courses, all of course extraordinarily important priorities

0:33:23.560 --> 0:33:26.480
<v Speaker 1>to bringing down the costs of electricity and groceries in

0:33:26.520 --> 0:33:31.920
<v Speaker 1>your home. Anyway, just not the smartest politician, but Donald

0:33:31.960 --> 0:33:35.160
<v Speaker 1>Trump's never been the smartest about messaging in that front.

0:33:35.200 --> 0:33:38.760
<v Speaker 1>But that brings me to I think a very important

0:33:38.840 --> 0:33:43.600
<v Speaker 1>essay from a quarterly journal. I'm a politically like I say,

0:33:43.640 --> 0:33:46.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm a want to be political scientist, I call myself

0:33:46.680 --> 0:33:51.280
<v Speaker 1>a political anthropologist. That means I actually read political science quarterlies.

0:33:52.240 --> 0:33:55.440
<v Speaker 1>And there's an extraordinarily important one that's out this week.

0:33:56.040 --> 0:33:58.800
<v Speaker 1>It's an essay in Foreign Affairs, which is the flagship

0:33:58.920 --> 0:34:02.880
<v Speaker 1>journal of the Council Foreign Relations. This isn't a partisan outlet,

0:34:03.880 --> 0:34:08.040
<v Speaker 1>it's not a resistance blog. It's the magazine where American presidents,

0:34:08.040 --> 0:34:12.120
<v Speaker 1>Secretary of States, national security advisors have gone for generations

0:34:12.120 --> 0:34:14.920
<v Speaker 1>debate how the world works and how the United States

0:34:15.000 --> 0:34:20.840
<v Speaker 1>role it should be. So three of the most respected

0:34:20.880 --> 0:34:23.920
<v Speaker 1>democracy scholars in the world from Harvard Toronto and the

0:34:23.920 --> 0:34:27.400
<v Speaker 1>Council on Foreign Relations, Steven Levitsky Luke and Way and

0:34:27.520 --> 0:34:30.719
<v Speaker 1>Daniel Ziblat. They're not cable pundits, they're not people you're

0:34:30.719 --> 0:34:32.680
<v Speaker 1>going to see in the round tables of Sunday shows.

0:34:33.000 --> 0:34:36.000
<v Speaker 1>They're not political activists. They're simply political scientists who spent

0:34:36.040 --> 0:34:40.399
<v Speaker 1>their career studying how democracies erode around the world, how

0:34:40.400 --> 0:34:43.760
<v Speaker 1>they fail, and occasionally how they recover.

0:34:47.040 --> 0:34:48.560
<v Speaker 2>Well. They have an essay called.

0:34:51.040 --> 0:34:57.120
<v Speaker 1>With about competitive authoritarianism, and in fact, this is what

0:34:57.160 --> 0:35:00.120
<v Speaker 1>they write. And this is why I took up very seriously.

0:35:00.160 --> 0:35:01.880
<v Speaker 1>This was not something I read, no offense to my

0:35:01.920 --> 0:35:04.120
<v Speaker 1>friends at the Bulwark. It's not something I read in

0:35:04.160 --> 0:35:05.759
<v Speaker 1>the Bulwark, not something you're going to see it here

0:35:05.760 --> 0:35:08.600
<v Speaker 1>in pod Save of America. Certainly not you might. I

0:35:08.680 --> 0:35:11.040
<v Speaker 1>doubt you'll hear this from my friend Eric Ericson either.

0:35:13.360 --> 0:35:15.600
<v Speaker 1>But here's this essay twenty twenty five. The United States

0:35:15.680 --> 0:35:18.920
<v Speaker 1>ceased to be a full democracy in the way that Canada,

0:35:18.960 --> 0:35:23.799
<v Speaker 1>Germany or even Argentina are democracies. Okay, they're just making

0:35:23.880 --> 0:35:27.280
<v Speaker 1>a classification. And then comes the line the game, however,

0:35:27.360 --> 0:35:32.120
<v Speaker 1>is far from up. They're not saying all is lost, okay.

0:35:32.200 --> 0:35:35.160
<v Speaker 1>It is an important essay because they deal with this

0:35:35.239 --> 0:35:39.960
<v Speaker 1>tension of yes we have had erosion and no, this

0:35:40.000 --> 0:35:44.919
<v Speaker 1>isn't permanent. Okay, So they argue that Donald Trump's second term,

0:35:45.040 --> 0:35:48.600
<v Speaker 1>the United States crossed a definitional line into something political

0:35:48.600 --> 0:35:53.480
<v Speaker 1>scientists call competitive authoritarianism. Here's how they define it. A

0:35:53.520 --> 0:35:57.080
<v Speaker 1>system in which parties compete and elections, but incumbents routinely

0:35:57.120 --> 0:36:00.320
<v Speaker 1>abuse their power to punish critics untilt the playing field

0:36:00.360 --> 0:36:04.360
<v Speaker 1>against their opposition. So elections still happen, but perhaps you

0:36:04.520 --> 0:36:08.440
<v Speaker 1>threaten lawmakers to redraw the maps to make more favorable elections.

0:36:08.640 --> 0:36:12.520
<v Speaker 1>Opposition parties still exist, but perhaps you raise the threshold

0:36:12.600 --> 0:36:15.319
<v Speaker 1>for petition signatures to get on a referendum, or you

0:36:15.480 --> 0:36:18.680
<v Speaker 1>change the dates and stuff see Missouri. But the referee

0:36:18.719 --> 0:36:22.000
<v Speaker 1>is no longer neutral, right, and the House rules keep changing.

0:36:22.000 --> 0:36:25.520
<v Speaker 1>And importantly, they're not saying this might happen, because it's

0:36:25.560 --> 0:36:28.240
<v Speaker 1>already happened in this country. A year ago, this group

0:36:28.320 --> 0:36:31.840
<v Speaker 1>predicted that this would be Trump's trajectory, that he'd weaponized

0:36:31.840 --> 0:36:36.040
<v Speaker 1>state institutions the way elected autocrats have done in Hungry, Turkey, Venezuela,

0:36:36.040 --> 0:36:39.080
<v Speaker 1>and India. And those are the four most important examples

0:36:39.080 --> 0:36:43.719
<v Speaker 1>to follow here, because Venezuela obviously the helm election, the

0:36:44.120 --> 0:36:47.680
<v Speaker 1>leader loss, and he wouldn't leave Turkey, Hungary and India

0:36:47.920 --> 0:36:53.680
<v Speaker 1>have are what are considered fairsh elections. But we'll find

0:36:53.680 --> 0:36:56.480
<v Speaker 1>out when the ruling party loses one day just how

0:36:56.520 --> 0:36:58.520
<v Speaker 1>fair they are. But they write this, Indeed, the Trump

0:36:58.520 --> 0:37:01.319
<v Speaker 1>administration has done exactly that. But here's what the authors say.

0:37:01.320 --> 0:37:04.640
<v Speaker 1>They didn't anticipate. What's surprised even them wasn't the speed,

0:37:04.640 --> 0:37:07.080
<v Speaker 1>but it was the scope. And they write this, one

0:37:07.120 --> 0:37:09.400
<v Speaker 1>form of authoritarian behavior that we did not anticipate a

0:37:09.440 --> 0:37:12.400
<v Speaker 1>year ago was the Trump administration's routine subversion of the

0:37:12.440 --> 0:37:16.040
<v Speaker 1>law and even the US Constitution. Well, we've seen that

0:37:16.080 --> 0:37:17.800
<v Speaker 1>with the strikes within as well. I mean, there is

0:37:18.400 --> 0:37:23.799
<v Speaker 1>very little, very little doubt here that this is not

0:37:23.920 --> 0:37:28.640
<v Speaker 1>yet not constitutional. The question is whether they'll even try

0:37:29.160 --> 0:37:37.560
<v Speaker 1>to give some congressional authority on that. So let me

0:37:37.560 --> 0:37:40.000
<v Speaker 1>outline a few more things that they write here, weaponizing

0:37:40.000 --> 0:37:42.320
<v Speaker 1>the state. They call it the blueprint. Every competitive authoritarian

0:37:42.400 --> 0:37:47.080
<v Speaker 1>regime follows a familiar playbook. Purge, then pack, so removing

0:37:47.120 --> 0:37:50.279
<v Speaker 1>professional civil servants who see their job as the law

0:37:50.320 --> 0:37:52.359
<v Speaker 1>and replace them with loyalists who see their job as

0:37:52.360 --> 0:37:55.360
<v Speaker 1>the leader. Just to look at the FBI, that's exactly

0:37:55.400 --> 0:37:58.160
<v Speaker 1>what they document happening inside the Justice Department, the FBI

0:37:58.160 --> 0:38:00.880
<v Speaker 1>and other key agencies. When officials resisted, they were just

0:38:00.960 --> 0:38:04.360
<v Speaker 1>simply removed. We've seen US attorneys, deputy US attorneys just

0:38:04.440 --> 0:38:08.640
<v Speaker 1>summarily fired. When replacements were chosen, they weren't selected for experience,

0:38:08.680 --> 0:38:12.040
<v Speaker 1>but for loyalty, including, as the author's note, Trump's own

0:38:12.040 --> 0:38:16.400
<v Speaker 1>personal lawyers installed as senior Justice Department officials. It's just

0:38:16.760 --> 0:38:22.040
<v Speaker 1>right out of, right, out of sort of. There's a

0:38:22.440 --> 0:38:26.560
<v Speaker 1>fun parody about authoritarianism called Moon over Parador, with Richard

0:38:26.600 --> 0:38:30.600
<v Speaker 1>Dreyfus to write that what seemed like parody is now real. Right,

0:38:31.480 --> 0:38:34.319
<v Speaker 1>And then even when prosecutions don't lead to convictions, the

0:38:34.360 --> 0:38:38.279
<v Speaker 1>authors explain why that doesn't matter. Such investigations themselves are

0:38:38.440 --> 0:38:41.960
<v Speaker 1>the powerful form of harassment, right, making Adam Shift hire

0:38:42.000 --> 0:38:44.479
<v Speaker 1>a lawyer, making Letitia James deal with this, making James

0:38:44.520 --> 0:38:47.920
<v Speaker 1>Comy deal with this, legal fees, time, reputational damage, career

0:38:47.960 --> 0:38:52.160
<v Speaker 1>disrupt eruption. The punishment is often the process itself. They

0:38:52.200 --> 0:38:54.839
<v Speaker 1>don't care if they get convictions. They just want them

0:38:54.960 --> 0:38:59.480
<v Speaker 1>constantly made to be, you know, unhireable. Don't get them

0:38:59.520 --> 0:39:03.000
<v Speaker 1>on corporate boards, make them seem as if they're controversial figures.

0:39:03.440 --> 0:39:06.200
<v Speaker 1>Then of course you got to follow the money. Because

0:39:06.239 --> 0:39:08.120
<v Speaker 1>this is what's happened with their next move, going after

0:39:08.160 --> 0:39:11.479
<v Speaker 1>civil society. How's the Trump administration done this. They've ordered

0:39:11.480 --> 0:39:16.000
<v Speaker 1>investigations into Act Blue, the primary arm of the Democratic Party,

0:39:16.640 --> 0:39:21.080
<v Speaker 1>Open Society Foundations, the George Soros founded organization. The Wall

0:39:21.120 --> 0:39:23.640
<v Speaker 1>Street Journal reported that that there are plans to target

0:39:23.680 --> 0:39:27.279
<v Speaker 1>Democratic donors through the IRS. That's right out of the

0:39:27.320 --> 0:39:31.879
<v Speaker 1>competitive authoritarian handbook that these political scientists know. Then there's

0:39:31.880 --> 0:39:33.920
<v Speaker 1>the pressure campaign against the media. Trump sued the New

0:39:34.000 --> 0:39:36.600
<v Speaker 1>York Times. On the Wall Street Journal, the FCC opened

0:39:37.040 --> 0:39:42.040
<v Speaker 1>silly investigations into ABC, CBS, PBS, NPR, Comcast, which owns NBC.

0:39:42.840 --> 0:39:45.880
<v Speaker 1>We've seen the FCC chair act like a thug in

0:39:46.000 --> 0:39:52.880
<v Speaker 1>threatening Jimmy Kimmel, Disney and NBC. It is it is,

0:39:52.960 --> 0:39:55.840
<v Speaker 1>and what makes this so dangerous and so effective is

0:39:56.600 --> 0:39:58.800
<v Speaker 1>is not just what happened, but because of what didn't happen.

0:39:59.440 --> 0:40:01.759
<v Speaker 1>In fact, the our authors are arguing that the most

0:40:01.760 --> 0:40:05.040
<v Speaker 1>insidious change isn't the repression, it's been the self censorship.

0:40:05.440 --> 0:40:08.560
<v Speaker 1>They point that outlets I've become realigning and pull back,

0:40:08.600 --> 0:40:11.319
<v Speaker 1>like the Washington Post, like the editorial page is kind

0:40:11.320 --> 0:40:14.719
<v Speaker 1>of a clown show. Now it is just outside of George, Well,

0:40:14.760 --> 0:40:17.640
<v Speaker 1>there's not a readable columnists left in that place.

0:40:18.239 --> 0:40:20.000
<v Speaker 2>It is just a joke.

0:40:20.440 --> 0:40:25.000
<v Speaker 1>The editorial page itself is sort of it's like they

0:40:25.040 --> 0:40:27.400
<v Speaker 1>have one thing they do every time if there's some

0:40:27.440 --> 0:40:31.560
<v Speaker 1>economic controversy, they write some convoluted editorial attacking Elizabeth Warren.

0:40:31.600 --> 0:40:33.960
<v Speaker 1>I guess that makes Cheff Bezos feel better, but it

0:40:34.040 --> 0:40:36.399
<v Speaker 1>has nothing to do with the point itself or any

0:40:36.480 --> 0:40:39.399
<v Speaker 1>of the actual rational debate that's gone on. You've had

0:40:39.440 --> 0:40:41.840
<v Speaker 1>the teen Vogue has sort of gotten rid of their

0:40:41.920 --> 0:40:45.799
<v Speaker 1>political coverage. CBS clearly just has a new owner and

0:40:45.840 --> 0:40:49.400
<v Speaker 1>they just wiped out, you know, brought in virtue signaling

0:40:49.440 --> 0:40:53.440
<v Speaker 1>new editors to run thing. We've seen Disney cave in,

0:40:53.680 --> 0:40:57.840
<v Speaker 1>We've seen plenty of again, all of these legacy media,

0:40:57.880 --> 0:41:03.080
<v Speaker 1>these corporate owned, shareholder driven media organizations that all fall

0:41:03.239 --> 0:41:06.440
<v Speaker 1>under Donald Trump's potential influence.

0:41:06.640 --> 0:41:07.680
<v Speaker 2>Due to government.

0:41:07.320 --> 0:41:11.160
<v Speaker 1>Regulation, they've all capitulated, which is why frankly, we're doing

0:41:11.200 --> 0:41:13.960
<v Speaker 1>so well here the podcast, so in some ways, thank you,

0:41:15.239 --> 0:41:17.680
<v Speaker 1>but unfortunately this is why we've all gone down this

0:41:17.719 --> 0:41:19.840
<v Speaker 1>independent road. Because if you want to be honest and

0:41:19.880 --> 0:41:21.719
<v Speaker 1>if you want to tell the truth, you're gonna have

0:41:21.719 --> 0:41:23.360
<v Speaker 1>to find a different outlet, because you're not gonna be

0:41:23.360 --> 0:41:25.400
<v Speaker 1>able to do it at the Washington Post, You're not

0:41:25.400 --> 0:41:29.040
<v Speaker 1>gonna be able to do it at the major legacy TV.

0:41:28.880 --> 0:41:29.719
<v Speaker 2>Networks that are left.

0:41:29.800 --> 0:41:33.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm not saying individuals aren't trying, but collectively they're not

0:41:33.520 --> 0:41:38.720
<v Speaker 1>even giving a chance. And here's the other thing. Here's

0:41:38.800 --> 0:41:42.480
<v Speaker 1>the part we don't know. What makes self censorship so

0:41:42.560 --> 0:41:45.359
<v Speaker 1>insidious is that it is virtually impossible to ascertain its

0:41:45.360 --> 0:41:49.040
<v Speaker 1>full impact. So wrote these authors, right, we can see

0:41:49.040 --> 0:41:51.839
<v Speaker 1>a firing, we can see a cancelation. What we can't

0:41:51.840 --> 0:41:54.560
<v Speaker 1>see are the stories that are never pitched, the investigations

0:41:54.600 --> 0:41:57.560
<v Speaker 1>that get quietly abandoned, or the headlines that are softened

0:41:57.560 --> 0:41:59.959
<v Speaker 1>out of fear, or the questions that don't get asked

0:42:00.000 --> 0:42:04.359
<v Speaker 1>stunt camera because executives in New York tell their correspondence

0:42:04.400 --> 0:42:08.000
<v Speaker 1>please don't do it. Because our corporate overlords are afraid

0:42:08.120 --> 0:42:09.520
<v Speaker 1>of blowback from the president.

0:42:11.600 --> 0:42:12.360
<v Speaker 2>That is happening.

0:42:13.680 --> 0:42:19.440
<v Speaker 1>You can guess where that's coming from. That's how democracies

0:42:19.480 --> 0:42:21.080
<v Speaker 1>hollow out. And this is where the essay draws a

0:42:21.080 --> 0:42:24.400
<v Speaker 1>crucial historical line. America has had its dark chapters. Jim

0:42:24.400 --> 0:42:28.560
<v Speaker 1>Crow red Scared, Japanese Internment mccarthyis and Nixon. But the

0:42:28.640 --> 0:42:33.160
<v Speaker 1>authors also argue that after Watergate, the overt authoritarian abuse

0:42:33.239 --> 0:42:36.840
<v Speaker 1>largely disappeared. Since nineteen seventy four, no democratic or Republican

0:42:36.880 --> 0:42:41.440
<v Speaker 1>administration had systematically politicized law enforcement or targeted political rivals

0:42:41.520 --> 0:42:42.760
<v Speaker 1>the way Donald Trump is doing.

0:42:43.239 --> 0:42:43.799
<v Speaker 2>George W.

0:42:43.880 --> 0:42:47.800
<v Speaker 1>Bush, his Justice Department investigator Republicans and Democrats. Barack Obama

0:42:47.880 --> 0:42:52.000
<v Speaker 1>appointed James Comey, a Republican, to be the head of

0:42:52.040 --> 0:42:55.719
<v Speaker 1>the FBI. Joe Biden kept Christopher Ray as head of

0:42:55.719 --> 0:43:00.520
<v Speaker 1>the FBI and appointee of Donald Trump. Mind you, Meyrick

0:43:00.560 --> 0:43:03.840
<v Speaker 1>Garland bent over backwards as Attorney General, sometimes to a fault,

0:43:04.000 --> 0:43:08.320
<v Speaker 1>to avoid the appearance of political interference. So the conclusion

0:43:08.360 --> 0:43:10.200
<v Speaker 1>is one in each of those critical areas that Trump

0:43:10.200 --> 0:43:13.239
<v Speaker 1>administration stands alone in its authoritarianism. Now, none of this

0:43:13.320 --> 0:43:16.320
<v Speaker 1>is inevitable. And here's where the essay shifts from diagnosis

0:43:16.760 --> 0:43:18.040
<v Speaker 1>to prognosis.

0:43:18.120 --> 0:43:18.640
<v Speaker 2>He says, the.

0:43:18.640 --> 0:43:22.520
<v Speaker 1>US still has advantages that most competitive authoritarian regimes do not.

0:43:23.120 --> 0:43:27.280
<v Speaker 1>There's still an independent judiciary, there's still a professional military,

0:43:27.560 --> 0:43:29.759
<v Speaker 1>though Pete haik Seth is trying to erode it. There's

0:43:29.800 --> 0:43:32.279
<v Speaker 1>still strong federalism. I mean, look at the way Ron

0:43:32.320 --> 0:43:35.000
<v Speaker 1>DeSantis is pushed back on the AI issue. In the

0:43:35.080 --> 0:43:37.720
<v Speaker 1>AI moratorium that Trump has done, there's still a vibrant

0:43:37.760 --> 0:43:42.960
<v Speaker 1>civil society hello, and there's a unified opposition party. And

0:43:43.000 --> 0:43:45.840
<v Speaker 1>Trump himself lacks the single most important asset the author's

0:43:45.880 --> 0:43:51.919
<v Speaker 1>note for authoritarian consolidation overwhelming popularity. Successful autocrats often rule

0:43:51.960 --> 0:43:54.520
<v Speaker 1>with approval ratings over eighty percent. Trump is stuck in

0:43:54.560 --> 0:43:57.480
<v Speaker 1>the low forties. And it's actually trending downward that matters.

0:43:58.120 --> 0:44:00.239
<v Speaker 2>So that brings us to what they are. Thank you,

0:44:00.280 --> 0:44:01.160
<v Speaker 2>is the greatest.

0:44:00.840 --> 0:44:04.640
<v Speaker 1>Danger of them all. The greatest danger is not repression,

0:44:04.680 --> 0:44:08.719
<v Speaker 1>but demobilization. It's not tanks, it's not mass arrests, its

0:44:09.200 --> 0:44:12.960
<v Speaker 1>acceptance and resignation. It's people deciding not to run, not

0:44:13.040 --> 0:44:15.480
<v Speaker 1>to donate, not to sue, not to vote. And then

0:44:15.520 --> 0:44:17.400
<v Speaker 1>this line, which is really the thesis of the piece,

0:44:17.719 --> 0:44:19.799
<v Speaker 1>The outcome of this struggle remains open. It will turn

0:44:19.880 --> 0:44:22.160
<v Speaker 1>less than the strength of the authoritarian government than on

0:44:22.200 --> 0:44:25.040
<v Speaker 1>whether enough citizens act as though their efforts still matter,

0:44:25.320 --> 0:44:29.920
<v Speaker 1>because for now they still do. So there you go, Levitzky,

0:44:29.960 --> 0:44:32.920
<v Speaker 1>Way and Ziblat. They aren't telling Americans to panic, They're

0:44:32.960 --> 0:44:36.400
<v Speaker 1>just telling you what is Okay, this is what has

0:44:36.440 --> 0:44:39.120
<v Speaker 1>happened to America the first year of Trump's second term.

0:44:39.400 --> 0:44:42.759
<v Speaker 1>We have slipped into something called competitive authoritarianism. He is

0:44:42.840 --> 0:44:46.640
<v Speaker 1>trying to create an authoritarian regime. There is democracy still,

0:44:46.680 --> 0:44:50.480
<v Speaker 1>there is still competition, okay. And our future is not

0:44:50.640 --> 0:44:53.520
<v Speaker 1>set in stone or the cement is still wet.

0:44:53.880 --> 0:44:54.160
<v Speaker 2>Okay.

0:44:54.200 --> 0:44:58.840
<v Speaker 1>They're warning against two equally dangerous instincts, complacency and fatalism.

0:44:59.200 --> 0:45:01.000
<v Speaker 1>The future is going to be unstable.

0:45:01.440 --> 0:45:01.840
<v Speaker 2>Okay.

0:45:02.120 --> 0:45:04.759
<v Speaker 1>Neither full democracy nor entrenched dictatorship is going to happen.

0:45:04.800 --> 0:45:06.120
<v Speaker 1>It's going to be a struggle. It is going to

0:45:06.120 --> 0:45:10.239
<v Speaker 1>be a fight. The next elections may be fought in

0:45:10.360 --> 0:45:12.680
<v Speaker 1>theory over policy differences, but they're really going to be

0:45:12.719 --> 0:45:15.480
<v Speaker 1>about the larger issue of what kind of system are

0:45:15.480 --> 0:45:18.319
<v Speaker 1>we choosing to live under? And that danger isn't that

0:45:18.520 --> 0:45:23.520
<v Speaker 1>democracy disappears overnight. It's the danger is people stop believing

0:45:23.560 --> 0:45:27.880
<v Speaker 1>that they can defend it. So please go read this piece.

0:45:28.040 --> 0:45:33.160
<v Speaker 1>It's extraordinarily important. It's well argued, it is you know,

0:45:33.320 --> 0:45:39.160
<v Speaker 1>evidence based, it is data driven. Is it is not

0:45:39.480 --> 0:45:44.799
<v Speaker 1>just alarmist cable commentary. And that's the most important thing.

0:45:44.800 --> 0:45:47.520
<v Speaker 1>And it comes from a place in the Council on

0:45:47.600 --> 0:45:52.280
<v Speaker 1>Foreign Relations where important ideas sort of get launched for debate.

0:45:52.400 --> 0:45:57.319
<v Speaker 1>And this is one that more and more mainstream Americans

0:45:57.480 --> 0:45:58.560
<v Speaker 1>need to understand.

0:45:59.040 --> 0:46:00.839
<v Speaker 2>What is happening as Tipping Place.

0:46:02.960 --> 0:46:05.560
<v Speaker 1>Do you hate hangovers? We'll say goodbye to hangovers. Out

0:46:05.600 --> 0:46:08.160
<v Speaker 1>of Office gives you the social buzz without the next

0:46:08.200 --> 0:46:10.520
<v Speaker 1>day regret. Their best selling out of Office gummies were

0:46:10.520 --> 0:46:13.440
<v Speaker 1>designed to provide a mild, relaxing buzz, boost your mood,

0:46:13.520 --> 0:46:17.080
<v Speaker 1>and enhance creativity and relaxation. With five different strengths, you

0:46:17.120 --> 0:46:19.319
<v Speaker 1>can tailor the dose to fit your vibe. From a

0:46:19.400 --> 0:46:23.480
<v Speaker 1>gentle one point five milligram micro doose to their newest

0:46:23.560 --> 0:46:27.560
<v Speaker 1>fifteen milligram gummy for a more elevated experience. Their THHC

0:46:27.719 --> 0:46:31.080
<v Speaker 1>beverages and gummies are a modern, mindful alternative to a

0:46:31.120 --> 0:46:33.640
<v Speaker 1>glass of wine or a cocktail. And I'll tell you this,

0:46:33.880 --> 0:46:36.839
<v Speaker 1>I've given up booze. I don't like the hangovers. I

0:46:37.080 --> 0:46:40.480
<v Speaker 1>prefer the gummy experience. Soul is a wellness brand that

0:46:40.520 --> 0:46:44.000
<v Speaker 1>believes feeling good should be fun and easy. Soul specializes

0:46:44.040 --> 0:46:47.720
<v Speaker 1>in delicious HEMP derived THHD and CBD products, all designed

0:46:47.719 --> 0:46:50.799
<v Speaker 1>to boost your mood and simply help you unwine, so

0:46:50.840 --> 0:46:52.120
<v Speaker 1>if you struggle to switch.

0:46:51.840 --> 0:46:52.319
<v Speaker 2>Off at night.

0:46:52.560 --> 0:46:55.520
<v Speaker 1>Soul also has a variety of products specifically designed to

0:46:55.640 --> 0:46:58.120
<v Speaker 1>just simply help you get a better night's sleep, including

0:46:58.160 --> 0:47:01.160
<v Speaker 1>their top selling sleepy Gummies. It's a fan favorite for

0:47:01.280 --> 0:47:04.400
<v Speaker 1>deep restorative sleep. So bring on the good vibes and

0:47:04.400 --> 0:47:08.000
<v Speaker 1>treat yourself to Soul today. Right now, Soul is offering

0:47:08.040 --> 0:47:11.359
<v Speaker 1>my audience thirty percent off your entire order. So go

0:47:11.400 --> 0:47:15.120
<v Speaker 1>to gitsold dot com use the promo code toodcast. Don't

0:47:15.160 --> 0:47:19.440
<v Speaker 1>forget that code. That's getsold dot Com promo code toodcast

0:47:19.600 --> 0:47:26.239
<v Speaker 1>for thirty percent off. All right, it's time to jump

0:47:26.280 --> 0:47:36.680
<v Speaker 1>into the time machine. We're going to go back to

0:47:37.280 --> 0:47:41.080
<v Speaker 1>December seventeenth, nineteen eighty nine. A young Chuck Todd was

0:47:41.120 --> 0:47:44.560
<v Speaker 1>a senior in high school. In case you were wondering

0:47:45.000 --> 0:47:50.680
<v Speaker 1>what I was doing, December seventeenth, nineteen eighty nine, it

0:47:50.800 --> 0:47:55.720
<v Speaker 1>was the debut of an animated series for adults called

0:47:55.960 --> 0:48:00.800
<v Speaker 1>The Simpsons. And who knew what kind of impact this?

0:48:01.040 --> 0:48:04.920
<v Speaker 1>I would argue, bigger than Saturday Night Live, bigger than

0:48:05.040 --> 0:48:10.000
<v Speaker 1>Meet the Press, right sort of, the launched Sunday Affairs

0:48:10.320 --> 0:48:13.719
<v Speaker 1>Conversations right in some ways before it was the first

0:48:13.719 --> 0:48:16.960
<v Speaker 1>place you ever had back and forth on politics in

0:48:17.040 --> 0:48:21.399
<v Speaker 1>a first radio and televised arena. We had Saturday Night Live,

0:48:21.560 --> 0:48:24.480
<v Speaker 1>sort of the king of parody. And then there's The Simpsons,

0:48:24.520 --> 0:48:28.799
<v Speaker 1>And in some ways the Simpsons are probably is important

0:48:30.560 --> 0:48:34.480
<v Speaker 1>of a participant into the changing ways that we satirized

0:48:34.520 --> 0:48:39.000
<v Speaker 1>politics than any other program that has been launched in

0:48:39.120 --> 0:48:42.440
<v Speaker 1>the last in the history of television. So that's the

0:48:42.440 --> 0:48:46.680
<v Speaker 1>subject of my time machine history lesson of the day.

0:48:46.680 --> 0:48:52.080
<v Speaker 1>How the Simpsons rewired politics, media and animation. And it

0:48:52.120 --> 0:48:54.360
<v Speaker 1>all started December seventeen, nineteen eighty nine. It was a

0:48:54.400 --> 0:48:58.080
<v Speaker 1>Christmas special. I remember it was a short on The

0:48:58.120 --> 0:49:00.760
<v Speaker 1>Tracy Ollman Show back in the day, but this Christmas

0:49:00.800 --> 0:49:03.719
<v Speaker 1>special aired on Fox and it looked loud, rough and

0:49:03.960 --> 0:49:06.800
<v Speaker 1>kind of disposable. Right, thirty five years later, that cartoon

0:49:07.480 --> 0:49:11.760
<v Speaker 1>hasn't just outlasted its peers, it's outlasted entire media eras.

0:49:12.080 --> 0:49:12.279
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:49:12.640 --> 0:49:17.719
<v Speaker 1>The Simpsons didn't just mock American politics, that's easy. What

0:49:17.760 --> 0:49:21.160
<v Speaker 1>they did is they reshaped on Americans understand power, persuasion,

0:49:21.440 --> 0:49:24.560
<v Speaker 1>and performance, and in the process they changed what animation

0:49:24.680 --> 0:49:29.920
<v Speaker 1>itself can be. And what I loved about what the

0:49:29.920 --> 0:49:31.160
<v Speaker 1>Simpsons did is they did it.

0:49:31.360 --> 0:49:31.640
<v Speaker 2>Look.

0:49:32.280 --> 0:49:36.239
<v Speaker 1>Was there a social socially liberal lean to the show, sure,

0:49:37.120 --> 0:49:40.440
<v Speaker 1>but it was not necessarily a liberal show or a

0:49:40.480 --> 0:49:44.560
<v Speaker 1>conservative show. In many ways really mocked process and it

0:49:44.640 --> 0:49:50.240
<v Speaker 1>was really good at surfacing hypocrisy and surfacing the absurdity

0:49:50.800 --> 0:49:53.799
<v Speaker 1>of the professionalization of politics. And in fact, one of

0:49:53.800 --> 0:49:54.960
<v Speaker 1>the early ways they did it.

0:49:55.000 --> 0:49:55.520
<v Speaker 2>And I want to.

0:49:55.520 --> 0:49:57.640
<v Speaker 1>Pop through a few shows that I think where they

0:49:58.200 --> 0:50:00.680
<v Speaker 1>really were brilliant and what they did. And when you

0:50:00.760 --> 0:50:02.520
<v Speaker 1>watch these shows today, you're think, oh, I've seen this

0:50:02.560 --> 0:50:04.920
<v Speaker 1>in other places, But at the time, nobody had ever

0:50:04.960 --> 0:50:08.040
<v Speaker 1>done this before. So Burns for Governor. When Moni Burns

0:50:08.120 --> 0:50:13.440
<v Speaker 1>ran for governor, the Simpsons showcased in the pop culture

0:50:13.520 --> 0:50:17.279
<v Speaker 1>area that something that we political reporters already knew, we

0:50:17.280 --> 0:50:20.600
<v Speaker 1>political junkies already knew that campaigns were a business. The

0:50:20.680 --> 0:50:22.880
<v Speaker 1>episode two cars in every garage and three eyes on

0:50:22.920 --> 0:50:25.680
<v Speaker 1>every fish. Mister Burns he doesn't just run for governor

0:50:25.880 --> 0:50:29.480
<v Speaker 1>because he believes in anything. He runs because regulation threatens him.

0:50:29.560 --> 0:50:31.520
<v Speaker 1>That's why he decides he wants to run for office.

0:50:31.600 --> 0:50:34.560
<v Speaker 1>The telling moment isn't the mutant fish. It's when Burns

0:50:34.600 --> 0:50:38.000
<v Speaker 1>instructs Smithers to assemble a campaign operation the way a

0:50:38.120 --> 0:50:41.880
<v Speaker 1>CEO would assemble a management team. And so for the

0:50:41.920 --> 0:50:44.640
<v Speaker 1>wider world, they understood give me a pollster, a media handler,

0:50:44.719 --> 0:50:48.960
<v Speaker 1>speech writer, an image consultant. And the episode showcased that

0:50:48.960 --> 0:50:53.320
<v Speaker 1>Burns understood something essential. Campaigns aren't moral arguments, they're simply

0:50:53.400 --> 0:50:57.360
<v Speaker 1>logistical ones. Now he loses not because voters rejected his policies,

0:50:57.440 --> 0:51:01.799
<v Speaker 1>but because he fails to convincingly perform as a relatable figure. Right,

0:51:01.800 --> 0:51:05.600
<v Speaker 1>he won't eat the fish. It's a lesson that campaigns

0:51:05.640 --> 0:51:09.359
<v Speaker 1>still learn relearn every cycle. Another episode that I thought

0:51:09.360 --> 0:51:11.200
<v Speaker 1>did a good job at sort of mocking government and

0:51:11.200 --> 0:51:14.719
<v Speaker 1>politics the monorail episode and the use of Broadway to

0:51:14.800 --> 0:51:19.200
<v Speaker 1>explain infrastructure failure. The episode Marge versus the Monorail endures

0:51:19.239 --> 0:51:22.279
<v Speaker 1>because it understands persuasion better than most policy memos do.

0:51:22.640 --> 0:51:25.240
<v Speaker 1>The episode is a deliberate homage to the music band

0:51:25.640 --> 0:51:30.120
<v Speaker 1>Monoreil Monoreel. Sorry Lyle Lanley is Harold Hill selling civic

0:51:30.160 --> 0:51:33.719
<v Speaker 1>fantasy through charming song. Well, the Monorail isn't about transportation,

0:51:34.040 --> 0:51:37.560
<v Speaker 1>it was simply about identity. Springfield doesn't choose the monorail

0:51:37.600 --> 0:51:39.960
<v Speaker 1>because it's efficient. I don't think they really needed one.

0:51:40.160 --> 0:51:42.719
<v Speaker 1>They choose it because it made them feel important. That's

0:51:42.719 --> 0:51:44.799
<v Speaker 1>how it was sold to them. In some ways, what

0:51:44.840 --> 0:51:47.279
<v Speaker 1>it was mocking were all the smaller cities that were

0:51:47.280 --> 0:51:51.600
<v Speaker 1>getting talked into debt financing arenas and other sort of

0:51:52.719 --> 0:51:58.400
<v Speaker 1>supposedly public arenas or entertainment complexes or concert halls, but

0:51:58.440 --> 0:52:01.680
<v Speaker 1>they were really about just helping them private entity make money.

0:52:02.320 --> 0:52:05.000
<v Speaker 1>The episode's genius in some ways was showing that democracy

0:52:05.000 --> 0:52:11.480
<v Speaker 1>can be overwhelmed by spectacle, not ignorance. In Mister Lisa

0:52:11.520 --> 0:52:14.560
<v Speaker 1>Goes to Washington, it remained one of the smarter portrayals

0:52:14.560 --> 0:52:17.399
<v Speaker 1>of civic education that we've had on television. Lisa's faith

0:52:17.440 --> 0:52:20.800
<v Speaker 1>in democracy is shaken, but it's not destroyed. The system

0:52:21.160 --> 0:52:24.760
<v Speaker 1>works barely because exposure still has power.

0:52:25.120 --> 0:52:25.839
<v Speaker 2>Sometimes.

0:52:26.360 --> 0:52:28.880
<v Speaker 1>The episode frequently is cited in academic work, believe it

0:52:28.960 --> 0:52:33.080
<v Speaker 1>or not, because it models critical citizenship skepticism without disengagement.

0:52:33.080 --> 0:52:34.440
<v Speaker 1>It goes back to the essay I had at the

0:52:34.480 --> 0:52:37.439
<v Speaker 1>beginning of this episode, right, don't give up. Even when

0:52:37.440 --> 0:52:39.400
<v Speaker 1>you think the system is rigged and it's messy and

0:52:39.440 --> 0:52:42.600
<v Speaker 1>it's ugly, there are still ways that you can make

0:52:42.640 --> 0:52:46.440
<v Speaker 1>the system work. Then, of course, there was sideshow Bob Roberts.

0:52:47.160 --> 0:52:50.960
<v Speaker 1>Good homage to that mockumentary back in the day that

0:52:51.000 --> 0:52:54.080
<v Speaker 1>show went further side show Bob riggs an election. It's

0:52:54.120 --> 0:53:00.160
<v Speaker 1>revealed and he wins anyway, sound familiar. Episode predicts scandal fatigue,

0:53:00.680 --> 0:53:06.000
<v Speaker 1>the idea that information alone no longer guarantees accountability. Unfortunately,

0:53:06.120 --> 0:53:08.400
<v Speaker 1>that was something that I think when people watched it

0:53:08.440 --> 0:53:11.840
<v Speaker 1>at the time. Oh no, that wouldn't really happen. Let's

0:53:11.880 --> 0:53:15.800
<v Speaker 1>just say the episode has aged uncomfortably well. Trash of

0:53:15.840 --> 0:53:19.480
<v Speaker 1>the Titans populism, deferred costs, and moral hatcher. Trash of

0:53:19.560 --> 0:53:21.680
<v Speaker 1>the Titans is local politics.

0:53:21.160 --> 0:53:22.160
<v Speaker 2>Done brutally right.

0:53:22.640 --> 0:53:26.680
<v Speaker 1>Homer runs for sanitation commissioner, promising more services, less effort,

0:53:26.680 --> 0:53:31.520
<v Speaker 1>and no responsibility. His slogan, can't someone else do it?

0:53:31.520 --> 0:53:35.560
<v Speaker 1>It isn't laziness, it is actually resentment. Once elected, Homer

0:53:35.600 --> 0:53:38.640
<v Speaker 1>delivers exactly what he promised, and the system collapses under

0:53:38.640 --> 0:53:39.800
<v Speaker 1>the weight of deferred costs.

0:53:39.840 --> 0:53:40.040
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:53:40.360 --> 0:53:43.400
<v Speaker 1>The most revealing moment isn't the failure, it's the response.

0:53:43.640 --> 0:53:48.320
<v Speaker 1>Springfield exports its garbage to another town. The episode captures

0:53:48.320 --> 0:53:51.560
<v Speaker 1>a timeless political truth. When costs are delayed or displaced,

0:53:51.719 --> 0:53:58.080
<v Speaker 1>accountability totally evaporates. Look it was. One thing about the

0:53:58.120 --> 0:54:04.120
<v Speaker 1>Simpsons is after a while their success at mocking actually

0:54:04.520 --> 0:54:08.200
<v Speaker 1>made it where politicians wanted to be seen as on

0:54:08.360 --> 0:54:11.040
<v Speaker 1>the side of the Simpsons, that on the side of

0:54:10.680 --> 0:54:13.759
<v Speaker 1>the reasonable people, that they weren't the crazy runs. And

0:54:13.800 --> 0:54:17.399
<v Speaker 1>you've had all sorts of people who have participated. Let

0:54:17.440 --> 0:54:21.439
<v Speaker 1>their voice. Barack Obama, I think Joe Biden did once

0:54:21.480 --> 0:54:23.480
<v Speaker 1>outcore Rush Limbaugh.

0:54:23.600 --> 0:54:23.839
<v Speaker 2>Did.

0:54:23.960 --> 0:54:28.680
<v Speaker 1>I believe you've had the George hw Bush episode when

0:54:28.680 --> 0:54:31.520
<v Speaker 1>he moves across the street from Homer is really well

0:54:31.560 --> 0:54:34.080
<v Speaker 1>done and it is almost in some ways an homage

0:54:34.239 --> 0:54:40.200
<v Speaker 1>hw Bush. So it was proof and certainly plenty of

0:54:40.239 --> 0:54:43.560
<v Speaker 1>media figures participated over the years Springfield became a legitimate

0:54:43.600 --> 0:54:46.160
<v Speaker 1>public square. Then, of course there's the impact that the

0:54:46.160 --> 0:54:49.840
<v Speaker 1>Simpsons had on what we all watched today, right. I know,

0:54:49.920 --> 0:54:53.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm a fan of a lot of adult animation these days,

0:54:53.200 --> 0:54:55.719
<v Speaker 1>and we have the Simpsons to think, right, think about it.

0:54:55.760 --> 0:55:00.400
<v Speaker 1>Before the Simpsons animation in America simply meant kids. After

0:55:00.440 --> 0:55:04.719
<v Speaker 1>the Simpsons animation meant tone and not age, right, And

0:55:04.800 --> 0:55:07.000
<v Speaker 1>what we all figured out was it was easier to

0:55:07.040 --> 0:55:09.680
<v Speaker 1>see an animated figure tell us an uncomfortable truth that

0:55:09.760 --> 0:55:12.040
<v Speaker 1>a real person telling us an uncomfortable truth.

0:55:12.120 --> 0:55:12.279
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:55:12.920 --> 0:55:14.879
<v Speaker 1>Without the Simpsons, we wouldn't have had King of the Hill,

0:55:15.360 --> 0:55:21.400
<v Speaker 1>South Park Family, Guy, Futurama, Archer, BoJack, Horseman, Rick and Morty.

0:55:21.640 --> 0:55:23.640
<v Speaker 1>I know I'm leaving a bunch out. You want to

0:55:23.640 --> 0:55:25.520
<v Speaker 1>tell me your favorite You want to tell me you

0:55:25.560 --> 0:55:29.320
<v Speaker 1>know what you think the Simpsons did to impact political culture.

0:55:29.360 --> 0:55:31.359
<v Speaker 1>I'd love to hear from you. And then, of course

0:55:31.360 --> 0:55:34.040
<v Speaker 1>there's one of my favorite homages to the Simpsons. Two

0:55:34.080 --> 0:55:37.239
<v Speaker 1>thousand and two, South Park aired an entire episode that

0:55:37.360 --> 0:55:39.120
<v Speaker 1>might be the most honest tribute of them all. It

0:55:39.160 --> 0:55:41.760
<v Speaker 1>was called Simpsons Did It, and the premise was simple.

0:55:42.160 --> 0:55:44.200
<v Speaker 1>Every idea of the South Park writers were trying to

0:55:44.200 --> 0:55:47.120
<v Speaker 1>come up with had already been done by the Simpsons.

0:55:47.360 --> 0:55:49.520
<v Speaker 2>And the whole punchline of the episode is.

0:55:49.680 --> 0:55:52.440
<v Speaker 1>Over and over again character shout out, Simpsons did It.

0:55:52.440 --> 0:55:55.480
<v Speaker 1>It wasn't being a mockery, it was simply acknowledgment. It

0:55:55.520 --> 0:55:57.760
<v Speaker 1>was clear our friends at south Park probably had writer's

0:55:57.800 --> 0:55:59.719
<v Speaker 1>block that week, and it may be why they went

0:55:59.800 --> 0:56:03.280
<v Speaker 1>to decide to just stick to parroting in the moment

0:56:03.320 --> 0:56:06.560
<v Speaker 1>stuff on that front. But that episode captured something every

0:56:06.600 --> 0:56:10.600
<v Speaker 1>creator understands. The Simpsons didn't just open the door. They

0:56:10.680 --> 0:56:15.160
<v Speaker 1>mapped the room right, and they they allowed so many

0:56:15.239 --> 0:56:17.880
<v Speaker 1>other creators to come in and have their own version

0:56:17.920 --> 0:56:20.160
<v Speaker 1>of this in their own take an entire generation of

0:56:20.200 --> 0:56:23.799
<v Speaker 1>writers to find the boundaries of what animated storytelling could

0:56:23.800 --> 0:56:29.800
<v Speaker 1>do politically, culturally, and emotionally. So the Simpsons still kicking.

0:56:30.280 --> 0:56:34.359
<v Speaker 1>They didn't just survive history. They've explained it. They taught

0:56:34.360 --> 0:56:40.160
<v Speaker 1>audiences how to spot performative leadership, civic spectacle, deferred accountability,

0:56:40.200 --> 0:56:42.960
<v Speaker 1>media driven politics, and they did it while teaching animation

0:56:43.040 --> 0:56:46.120
<v Speaker 1>how to grow up. So that's why the show still matters.

0:56:46.440 --> 0:56:49.560
<v Speaker 1>And somewhere a creator is still pitching an idea only

0:56:49.600 --> 0:56:52.000
<v Speaker 1>to hear a familiar voice in the room say, Simpsons

0:56:52.040 --> 0:56:54.600
<v Speaker 1>did it all right, let's get into a little ass

0:56:54.760 --> 0:57:00.360
<v Speaker 1>chuck ass chuck to do.

0:57:00.960 --> 0:57:02.279
<v Speaker 2>Here's my promise to you.

0:57:02.320 --> 0:57:04.279
<v Speaker 1>Some of you probably been wondering, Hey, I threw a

0:57:04.360 --> 0:57:06.160
<v Speaker 1>question in here a while ago. How come you haven't

0:57:06.200 --> 0:57:08.359
<v Speaker 1>dealt with it? I thought it was a pretty good question. Well,

0:57:08.400 --> 0:57:12.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to have an entire episode where I'm just

0:57:12.719 --> 0:57:16.600
<v Speaker 1>answering questions and trying to play catch up a little bit.

0:57:16.640 --> 0:57:20.760
<v Speaker 1>That'll happen in a couple of weeks and yes, if

0:57:20.760 --> 0:57:22.680
<v Speaker 1>you want to chalk it up to oh, it's the holidays,

0:57:22.680 --> 0:57:24.880
<v Speaker 1>but yes, okay, but it's going to be new content.

0:57:25.440 --> 0:57:28.200
<v Speaker 1>I promise it is not. It is not me just

0:57:28.280 --> 0:57:31.160
<v Speaker 1>trying to well. It is me trying to have a

0:57:31.160 --> 0:57:33.240
<v Speaker 1>couple of days off. I'm not going to lie about that.

0:57:33.400 --> 0:57:35.960
<v Speaker 1>But it will be timely and it will be useful,

0:57:36.040 --> 0:57:38.280
<v Speaker 1>I promise. But let me get in here. Get three

0:57:38.360 --> 0:57:40.960
<v Speaker 1>or four questions in here. First one comes from Tiffany

0:57:41.040 --> 0:57:43.520
<v Speaker 1>and she writes, did Adam Schiff hurt or help Mandela

0:57:43.560 --> 0:57:46.400
<v Speaker 1>Barnes by endorsing him for Wisconsin Governor? I live in Wisconsin.

0:57:46.440 --> 0:57:48.520
<v Speaker 1>I have voted Republican until twenty eighteen. I think there

0:57:48.520 --> 0:57:50.680
<v Speaker 1>are a lot of people like me politically in Wisconsin.

0:57:50.920 --> 0:57:53.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that anyone in Wisconsin will appreciate endorsement

0:57:53.160 --> 0:57:56.680
<v Speaker 1>from California. Also, recent history shows that big endorsements from

0:57:56.680 --> 0:57:58.880
<v Speaker 1>the Republican Party fail in Wisconsin. It seems a little

0:57:58.880 --> 0:58:01.440
<v Speaker 1>out of touch for the Democrats big endorsements like this, thoughts.

0:58:01.440 --> 0:58:02.160
<v Speaker 2>Thank you Tiffany.

0:58:02.440 --> 0:58:06.440
<v Speaker 1>Well, Tiffany, there's one simple reason why an Adam Shi,

0:58:06.600 --> 0:58:10.960
<v Speaker 1>why a Mandela Barnes would consider an Adam shift endorsement

0:58:11.280 --> 0:58:13.840
<v Speaker 1>meaningful or helpful to him, and that is that Adam

0:58:13.880 --> 0:58:20.760
<v Speaker 1>Shift has one of the most lucrative emailress of fundraising

0:58:20.840 --> 0:58:25.840
<v Speaker 1>lists in the country. One he's from the largest state,

0:58:26.000 --> 0:58:28.880
<v Speaker 1>particularly the largest liberal state in California. Two by being

0:58:28.960 --> 0:58:34.080
<v Speaker 1>the face of impeachment, he build a massive donor list.

0:58:34.440 --> 0:58:38.400
<v Speaker 1>Then being attacked by Donald Trump constantly has only served

0:58:38.400 --> 0:58:41.760
<v Speaker 1>to make that donor list more active, more viable.

0:58:41.840 --> 0:58:43.800
<v Speaker 2>So you are right.

0:58:43.920 --> 0:58:47.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't think anybody, any Wisconsin voter is going to

0:58:47.320 --> 0:58:49.960
<v Speaker 1>be moved by the endorsement. And if Mandela Barnes actually

0:58:50.000 --> 0:58:53.640
<v Speaker 1>puts uses Adam Shift's endorsement and paid media, he'd be

0:58:53.720 --> 0:58:56.120
<v Speaker 1>a fool. No offense to Adam Shift. But I don't

0:58:56.120 --> 0:58:58.600
<v Speaker 1>think any make cares. I think you're absolutely right. But

0:58:58.760 --> 0:59:03.160
<v Speaker 1>if you're wondering why is that, why does this endorsement

0:59:03.720 --> 0:59:07.040
<v Speaker 1>mean something to Mandela Barnes to Chang to ching, to

0:59:07.160 --> 0:59:09.959
<v Speaker 1>ching to ching. It is access to that email list,

0:59:10.600 --> 0:59:17.560
<v Speaker 1>That's what it is. And Adam Shift probably only only

0:59:17.920 --> 0:59:22.280
<v Speaker 1>president presidential nominees probably have bigger and more interesting level

0:59:22.360 --> 0:59:25.080
<v Speaker 1>like Kamala Harris's list that she controls was going to

0:59:25.120 --> 0:59:27.440
<v Speaker 1>be a good one. But Adam Shift is probably the

0:59:27.720 --> 0:59:32.680
<v Speaker 1>single best left leaning fundraising list in America. That is

0:59:32.800 --> 0:59:37.959
<v Speaker 1>not that for somebody who never ran for president. He's

0:59:38.040 --> 0:59:40.520
<v Speaker 1>just all the ingredients are there, the impeachment, the attacks

0:59:40.560 --> 0:59:42.800
<v Speaker 1>from Trump's and being from California.

0:59:42.320 --> 0:59:43.200
<v Speaker 2>You throw all that in there.

0:59:43.720 --> 0:59:48.720
<v Speaker 1>That was why Mandela Barnes wanted that endorsement, and why

0:59:48.760 --> 0:59:51.760
<v Speaker 1>the endorsement matters to him. It is not intended to

0:59:51.840 --> 0:59:54.040
<v Speaker 1>try to persuade you, and in fact, it sounds like

0:59:54.080 --> 0:59:56.480
<v Speaker 1>that that stuff might actually dissuade you. And I think

0:59:56.640 --> 0:59:58.640
<v Speaker 1>in some ways some of these endorsement I don't think.

0:59:59.080 --> 1:00:01.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't think endorsem Smith's matter unless they bring you

1:00:01.480 --> 1:00:03.560
<v Speaker 1>something else. And in this case, what he's looking for

1:00:03.640 --> 1:00:07.200
<v Speaker 1>is just access to grassroots dollars, and Adam Schiff probably

1:00:07.200 --> 1:00:09.160
<v Speaker 1>has the single best fundraising.

1:00:08.800 --> 1:00:09.280
<v Speaker 2>Lists there is.

1:00:09.480 --> 1:00:11.040
<v Speaker 1>All right, let me go to next question comes from

1:00:11.080 --> 1:00:15.080
<v Speaker 1>Max w Hey, Chuck and Chris ah Hey, Solissa, you're

1:00:15.080 --> 1:00:17.160
<v Speaker 1>not answering your mail bag, so I'm gonna have to

1:00:17.200 --> 1:00:18.320
<v Speaker 1>answer your leftovers here.

1:00:20.400 --> 1:00:20.840
<v Speaker 2>Max W.

1:00:21.000 --> 1:00:23.000
<v Speaker 1>Wrights, I posted this as a comment for Chris Silia's

1:00:23.040 --> 1:00:24.720
<v Speaker 1>mail bag already, but I want to suggest again what

1:00:24.800 --> 1:00:27.400
<v Speaker 1>I think is a great wager. Oh on the Aggies

1:00:27.480 --> 1:00:30.560
<v Speaker 1>versus Kane's matchup, loser shaves his head. Why are we

1:00:30.640 --> 1:00:33.439
<v Speaker 1>doing this? No shaving of heads or goatee's or anything

1:00:33.520 --> 1:00:34.760
<v Speaker 1>like this, but okay, let me listen.

1:00:35.760 --> 1:00:36.040
<v Speaker 2>He goes.

1:00:36.040 --> 1:00:38.480
<v Speaker 1>It's don monetary, demonstrates actual commitment to the schools you

1:00:38.480 --> 1:00:41.080
<v Speaker 1>both support. I've made a few loser shaves bets in

1:00:41.080 --> 1:00:42.800
<v Speaker 1>my day, and I'll be honest, I've never felt more

1:00:42.840 --> 1:00:45.840
<v Speaker 1>invested in a result. Maybe Reginald could handle the Clippers

1:00:46.080 --> 1:00:48.680
<v Speaker 1>well if you know, you know, but you'd better get

1:00:48.720 --> 1:00:51.880
<v Speaker 1>them to him before he hits the Johnny Walker blue things.

1:00:52.120 --> 1:00:53.360
<v Speaker 2>I will I have.

1:00:54.000 --> 1:00:56.919
<v Speaker 1>I'm one time, let Tapper, Jake Tapper talk me into

1:00:56.920 --> 1:01:03.680
<v Speaker 1>a This was back Phillies Dodgers Sarah twenty thirteen, twenty

1:01:03.800 --> 1:01:07.560
<v Speaker 1>twelve NLCS, maybe twenty fourteen NLCS. I'm just trying to

1:01:07.560 --> 1:01:10.880
<v Speaker 1>remember when the Dodgers were, you know, still hadn't quite

1:01:11.120 --> 1:01:15.520
<v Speaker 1>gotten broken through. They were still still you know, thinking,

1:01:16.160 --> 1:01:18.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, they were still believing Matt Kemp was the

1:01:18.400 --> 1:01:20.720
<v Speaker 1>best player they could sign. Right, They weren't quite the

1:01:20.760 --> 1:01:24.840
<v Speaker 1>Dodgers yet, they hadn't been become the juggernaut that they

1:01:24.840 --> 1:01:27.760
<v Speaker 1>had become. And the Phillies were prett Good Juggernaut, that

1:01:27.800 --> 1:01:31.040
<v Speaker 1>team that was the sort of the last gasp of

1:01:31.120 --> 1:01:37.720
<v Speaker 1>Ryan Howard and that crowd, and Tapper wanted to create

1:01:37.760 --> 1:01:40.760
<v Speaker 1>some social media fun and he wanted to make it.

1:01:41.040 --> 1:01:42.280
<v Speaker 1>He was going to grow and I was going to

1:01:42.320 --> 1:01:45.439
<v Speaker 1>shave one. I never agreed to the bet, but he

1:01:45.720 --> 1:01:49.800
<v Speaker 1>tried to social media bully me about it anyway, So

1:01:49.960 --> 1:01:55.000
<v Speaker 1>no I I lost and made a nice sizeable contribution

1:01:55.520 --> 1:02:01.200
<v Speaker 1>to the charity of his choice. Look now, I will

1:02:01.200 --> 1:02:06.040
<v Speaker 1>say this, I'm probably more comfortable trying to shave my

1:02:06.080 --> 1:02:08.000
<v Speaker 1>head now that I would have been ten years ago, because,

1:02:08.040 --> 1:02:11.840
<v Speaker 1>as you could say, it is thinning, and maybe you know,

1:02:11.920 --> 1:02:16.000
<v Speaker 1>my only fear is if I totally do it, what

1:02:16.200 --> 1:02:18.960
<v Speaker 1>happens if it, even this doesn't come back, right the

1:02:19.120 --> 1:02:22.640
<v Speaker 1>fear us middle aged men have about what what if

1:02:22.680 --> 1:02:23.760
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't come back.

1:02:24.040 --> 1:02:25.720
<v Speaker 2>I was watching a basketball.

1:02:25.240 --> 1:02:28.960
<v Speaker 1>Game over the weekend. The GWA Revolutionaries were in the

1:02:29.080 --> 1:02:31.840
<v Speaker 1>in the Orange Bowl, this Orange Bowl tournament down in

1:02:31.840 --> 1:02:36.240
<v Speaker 1>Fort Lauderdale. We were playing GW was playing Florida. I

1:02:36.240 --> 1:02:39.240
<v Speaker 1>think they hung that held pretty well. They'd hit their

1:02:39.240 --> 1:02:41.560
<v Speaker 1>free throws, they might have won that game. I think

1:02:41.560 --> 1:02:44.800
<v Speaker 1>it was a pretty good test that you know, GW

1:02:44.920 --> 1:02:47.720
<v Speaker 1>I think is a mid major that may make a

1:02:47.760 --> 1:02:51.920
<v Speaker 1>strong case to get into the NCAA tournament. But the

1:02:51.960 --> 1:02:54.560
<v Speaker 1>other game was you Mass versus Florida State, and UMass

1:02:54.640 --> 1:02:57.600
<v Speaker 1>is coached by a Miami native named Frank Martin. He

1:02:57.680 --> 1:02:59.760
<v Speaker 1>was the guy that took South Carolina. Well, he's gone

1:02:59.800 --> 1:03:02.920
<v Speaker 1>full a head shave and he looks great. I mean,

1:03:03.040 --> 1:03:05.160
<v Speaker 1>kudos to m I would not have thought that he

1:03:05.160 --> 1:03:08.080
<v Speaker 1>would have done the cuball thing very well. He does

1:03:08.080 --> 1:03:10.840
<v Speaker 1>it well. He looks good, just as menacing. I'd still

1:03:10.880 --> 1:03:15.280
<v Speaker 1>be afraid of him coaching a team on the other side,

1:03:15.640 --> 1:03:18.320
<v Speaker 1>but it looked like there's nothing that'll grow back, you know.

1:03:18.520 --> 1:03:21.040
<v Speaker 1>So that's my fear of playing the head shave game.

1:03:22.960 --> 1:03:23.600
<v Speaker 1>We'll see.

1:03:24.440 --> 1:03:27.800
<v Speaker 2>I'd say that I think solicit fears he can't grow beer.

1:03:28.280 --> 1:03:28.720
<v Speaker 2>We'll see.

1:03:28.760 --> 1:03:31.160
<v Speaker 1>I'll ask him about this on our next episode. All right,

1:03:31.160 --> 1:03:35.120
<v Speaker 1>next question comes from Andre from Los Angeles, and he writes, Hey, Chuck,

1:03:35.280 --> 1:03:37.320
<v Speaker 1>why is it that when someone announces a run for office,

1:03:37.360 --> 1:03:39.680
<v Speaker 1>the first focus is always on who their donors are

1:03:39.680 --> 1:03:42.560
<v Speaker 1>and whether these donors will approve It feels like candidates

1:03:42.560 --> 1:03:45.160
<v Speaker 1>are vetted by donors, consultants, and party brass long before

1:03:45.160 --> 1:03:47.760
<v Speaker 1>they ever reach voters, which makes them seem inta authentic.

1:03:47.840 --> 1:03:50.880
<v Speaker 1>Voters want real, opinionated leaders who feel genuine, not prepackaged

1:03:50.880 --> 1:03:53.160
<v Speaker 1>for donor approval. Why has the donor class become the

1:03:53.200 --> 1:03:58.120
<v Speaker 1>priority over the general public? Andre la go bruins hashtag

1:03:58.200 --> 1:04:02.680
<v Speaker 1>UCLA because of how expensive campaigns have become. I'm not

1:04:02.840 --> 1:04:06.000
<v Speaker 1>saying that's a good answer, in just telling you it

1:04:06.240 --> 1:04:10.840
<v Speaker 1>is the answer, And there is a perception of viability

1:04:11.720 --> 1:04:14.000
<v Speaker 1>has to do with access to money, whether you have

1:04:14.080 --> 1:04:16.680
<v Speaker 1>it yourself, you have the donor. You know, it's sort

1:04:16.680 --> 1:04:21.080
<v Speaker 1>of this dovetails pretty well with the question about Adam Schiff. Look,

1:04:21.160 --> 1:04:23.920
<v Speaker 1>there's no doubt we have made money in politics. The

1:04:23.960 --> 1:04:26.360
<v Speaker 1>fact that there is no regulation of money in politics, right,

1:04:26.400 --> 1:04:30.120
<v Speaker 1>we have essentially have unregulated money in politics. They're okay,

1:04:30.160 --> 1:04:31.800
<v Speaker 1>so you have to follow a couple, You have to

1:04:31.880 --> 1:04:35.960
<v Speaker 1>jump a very small hurdle or two to maybe spend

1:04:36.080 --> 1:04:39.960
<v Speaker 1>money that raised a certain way on these few logistics

1:04:39.960 --> 1:04:43.360
<v Speaker 1>things for a campaign. But then you spend money over

1:04:43.400 --> 1:04:46.880
<v Speaker 1>here there is no we have. This is why I'm

1:04:46.920 --> 1:04:49.280
<v Speaker 1>a huge fan of a constitutional you know, we need

1:04:49.280 --> 1:04:51.520
<v Speaker 1>a constitutional amendment to deal with this. We're going to

1:04:51.600 --> 1:04:55.000
<v Speaker 1>have to I think there's some common sense campaign finance

1:04:56.280 --> 1:05:00.880
<v Speaker 1>regulations that people could agree on. I think the idea

1:05:00.920 --> 1:05:03.600
<v Speaker 1>of keeping corporations out of politics makes a hell of

1:05:03.640 --> 1:05:07.240
<v Speaker 1>a lot sense. Figuring out how to have complete transparency.

1:05:07.240 --> 1:05:11.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, anonymous donors dark money are terrible. We basically

1:05:11.600 --> 1:05:15.440
<v Speaker 1>have one or two people that are representing somewhere between

1:05:16.000 --> 1:05:19.240
<v Speaker 1>thirty and thirty percent of all money spent is probably

1:05:19.400 --> 1:05:22.800
<v Speaker 1>among a group of people that's less than ten. That

1:05:23.040 --> 1:05:26.800
<v Speaker 1>is not a democracy, right, That is a plutocracy or

1:05:26.840 --> 1:05:29.840
<v Speaker 1>an oligarchy, if to borrow some language that are out there.

1:05:30.520 --> 1:05:33.160
<v Speaker 1>I hate saying oligarchy because it sounds like I'm taking

1:05:33.200 --> 1:05:36.000
<v Speaker 1>a political side, but we have The fact of the

1:05:36.040 --> 1:05:39.240
<v Speaker 1>matter is the richer you are, the more access you

1:05:39.320 --> 1:05:47.360
<v Speaker 1>have to political leaders hard stop. And that's a maybe

1:05:47.360 --> 1:05:50.000
<v Speaker 1>that's never going to change. But we could put some

1:05:50.040 --> 1:05:54.200
<v Speaker 1>more transparency and some more limits on how that works.

1:05:55.240 --> 1:05:57.520
<v Speaker 1>But I'm not saying it should be this way. But

1:05:57.640 --> 1:06:01.120
<v Speaker 1>you're asking why does this happen? Because my ability goes

1:06:01.160 --> 1:06:03.320
<v Speaker 1>through money. Now, the good news is the Internet has

1:06:04.040 --> 1:06:07.120
<v Speaker 1>been a bit of a leveler there. Act Blue and

1:06:07.160 --> 1:06:11.040
<v Speaker 1>When Red both have found a way to take to

1:06:11.160 --> 1:06:17.800
<v Speaker 1>allow at least grassroots donors to power candidacies. And you

1:06:17.840 --> 1:06:20.360
<v Speaker 1>can now do that, right, Marjorie Taylor Green can do it.

1:06:21.400 --> 1:06:24.000
<v Speaker 1>AOC can do it, and they've figured out how to

1:06:24.000 --> 1:06:26.680
<v Speaker 1>tap into that. So the power of the small donor

1:06:26.880 --> 1:06:30.640
<v Speaker 1>is not totally. In fact, in some ways, small donor,

1:06:31.120 --> 1:06:33.960
<v Speaker 1>because of the collective nature of it, have become a

1:06:34.040 --> 1:06:37.680
<v Speaker 1>more powerful as powerful of an entity at times that

1:06:37.840 --> 1:06:39.880
<v Speaker 1>some of these corporate super PACs can be.

1:06:39.960 --> 1:06:40.000
<v Speaker 2>So.

1:06:41.160 --> 1:06:44.360
<v Speaker 1>But look, we do this in this case the system

1:06:44.400 --> 1:06:47.840
<v Speaker 1>has broken. We have unregulated amount of money. I'm sort

1:06:47.880 --> 1:06:51.520
<v Speaker 1>of a NASCAR person in this respect. Let's go full transparency,

1:06:51.560 --> 1:06:55.400
<v Speaker 1>but you have to actually identify your major donors. If

1:06:55.920 --> 1:07:00.440
<v Speaker 1>you made every person have to spell out the aims

1:07:00.880 --> 1:07:03.360
<v Speaker 1>of donors who have given them, say more than one

1:07:03.400 --> 1:07:05.480
<v Speaker 1>hundred thousand dollars or more, I promise you they'd never

1:07:05.520 --> 1:07:08.800
<v Speaker 1>take a donation more than nine nine d and ninety

1:07:08.840 --> 1:07:13.840
<v Speaker 1>nine dollars, right, whatever threshold we create, you know, like

1:07:13.960 --> 1:07:16.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm all for you want to have unlimited funding in

1:07:16.200 --> 1:07:18.520
<v Speaker 1>your elections, fine, but anybody that gives you more than

1:07:18.600 --> 1:07:21.920
<v Speaker 1>ninety nine hundred dollars, you have to name them in

1:07:21.960 --> 1:07:25.360
<v Speaker 1>every single app, and you've got to where their logos

1:07:25.400 --> 1:07:28.920
<v Speaker 1>on your on your paraphernalia, if you will, right, That's

1:07:28.960 --> 1:07:33.000
<v Speaker 1>what I mean by the nascarization of it. I think

1:07:33.880 --> 1:07:37.200
<v Speaker 1>that if as long as people know who's behind things,

1:07:39.320 --> 1:07:41.680
<v Speaker 1>then at least you're giving the voters a fighting.

1:07:41.480 --> 1:07:43.040
<v Speaker 2>Chance to make their decision.

1:07:44.200 --> 1:07:47.080
<v Speaker 1>All right, I'm mistaking one more question here, so I

1:07:47.120 --> 1:07:49.600
<v Speaker 1>can say that at least knock out four today. This

1:07:49.680 --> 1:07:53.560
<v Speaker 1>one comes from Sean McElroy Byfield, Massachusetts. Any writs, Hey, Chuck,

1:07:53.760 --> 1:07:56.160
<v Speaker 1>why is it that corporation's going to absorb tariff costs

1:07:56.160 --> 1:07:58.960
<v Speaker 1>for months but push back immediately when asked to raise wages?

1:07:59.320 --> 1:08:01.960
<v Speaker 1>After COVID, we sow quick inflation tied to wage increases,

1:08:01.960 --> 1:08:04.880
<v Speaker 1>but terror related price hikes seemed delayed. I've read that

1:08:04.960 --> 1:08:07.520
<v Speaker 1>Costco expects tar free funds, that is, offering credit now

1:08:07.520 --> 1:08:11.320
<v Speaker 1>to investors to soften consumer impacts while boosting future profits. Curiously,

1:08:11.280 --> 1:08:12.960
<v Speaker 1>if you've heard more about that, Any thoughts on the

1:08:12.960 --> 1:08:16.520
<v Speaker 1>disconnect between political focus and stagnant worker incomes?

1:08:16.840 --> 1:08:17.799
<v Speaker 2>Well, look, I think.

1:08:17.600 --> 1:08:19.800
<v Speaker 1>On the tariff, the reason some of this is you

1:08:19.840 --> 1:08:25.000
<v Speaker 1>had a lot of companies stockpile, right. You know, Trump

1:08:25.080 --> 1:08:27.519
<v Speaker 1>made it clear what he was going to do with

1:08:27.600 --> 1:08:30.760
<v Speaker 1>this tariff, so you did have plenty of company stockpile

1:08:32.040 --> 1:08:35.439
<v Speaker 1>inventory where you could, right you couldn't do it and

1:08:35.800 --> 1:08:38.760
<v Speaker 1>food and fresh food and produce and things like that,

1:08:39.080 --> 1:08:42.920
<v Speaker 1>but you could stock up on certain goods in your

1:08:43.000 --> 1:08:45.880
<v Speaker 1>and essentially warehouse them. And a place like Costco is

1:08:46.720 --> 1:08:49.680
<v Speaker 1>something that has the has the ability to do that,

1:08:50.600 --> 1:08:54.599
<v Speaker 1>And so I think that's why they could quote unquote

1:08:54.680 --> 1:08:57.680
<v Speaker 1>absorb some of it early because they had still had

1:08:57.680 --> 1:08:59.639
<v Speaker 1>a majority of their inventory out there that they had

1:08:59.680 --> 1:09:03.400
<v Speaker 1>perched without having to pay, without having to deal with

1:09:03.439 --> 1:09:07.519
<v Speaker 1>extra tariffs. But look, you're you're you know, why do

1:09:07.640 --> 1:09:10.559
<v Speaker 1>corporations constantly look for ways to show that they're saving money?

1:09:10.680 --> 1:09:10.840
<v Speaker 2>Right?

1:09:10.880 --> 1:09:12.880
<v Speaker 1>That might be another way that you ask that question, right,

1:09:12.880 --> 1:09:16.759
<v Speaker 1>They they constantly It's why why are companies not hiring

1:09:16.800 --> 1:09:19.000
<v Speaker 1>at the moment? They all want to see how many

1:09:19.080 --> 1:09:21.680
<v Speaker 1>jobs can they replace with AI. They're not going to

1:09:21.960 --> 1:09:24.080
<v Speaker 1>they know they can't replace all jobs with AI, but

1:09:24.600 --> 1:09:26.840
<v Speaker 1>they want to know which ones they can, and before

1:09:26.880 --> 1:09:29.559
<v Speaker 1>they replace anybody, they want to try to see if

1:09:29.560 --> 1:09:33.960
<v Speaker 1>they can replace them with AI. Corp A publicly traded

1:09:33.960 --> 1:09:37.360
<v Speaker 1>companies simply have a fudial responsibility for their shareholders, and

1:09:37.360 --> 1:09:41.800
<v Speaker 1>their shareholders only reward cost efficiencies. That is, that is

1:09:42.200 --> 1:09:44.479
<v Speaker 1>not good for rising you know, for the hopes of

1:09:44.560 --> 1:09:50.839
<v Speaker 1>rising wages, and it is certainly makes UH stockpiling expensive

1:09:50.840 --> 1:09:53.400
<v Speaker 1>inventory difficult as well if you're going to load.

1:09:53.320 --> 1:09:54.080
<v Speaker 2>Them up with tariffs.

1:09:54.080 --> 1:09:58.080
<v Speaker 1>So you know, this is why what Trump has done

1:09:58.120 --> 1:10:00.840
<v Speaker 1>to this economy that the rise of terror costs also

1:10:00.960 --> 1:10:08.120
<v Speaker 1>in it inadvertently end up costing working class people a

1:10:08.200 --> 1:10:11.479
<v Speaker 1>chance at a raise. Right, If goods were cheaper, more

1:10:11.479 --> 1:10:13.719
<v Speaker 1>people might buy them, and you might need more people

1:10:13.760 --> 1:10:17.320
<v Speaker 1>to actually delve out that inventory. So you know, this

1:10:17.439 --> 1:10:20.439
<v Speaker 1>is why this tariff policy of the presidents is so

1:10:21.080 --> 1:10:24.240
<v Speaker 1>bad for the economy. It just simply shrinks our GDP

1:10:24.880 --> 1:10:30.439
<v Speaker 1>shrinks in a way that will just hurt everything. Fewer

1:10:30.439 --> 1:10:35.559
<v Speaker 1>people buy items, which means you'll have fewer employees, fewer wage,

1:10:35.640 --> 1:10:37.719
<v Speaker 1>fewer people gaining a wage as it is, and fewer

1:10:37.720 --> 1:10:42.639
<v Speaker 1>people getting higher wages. Bottom line is, tariffs are bad

1:10:42.920 --> 1:10:46.719
<v Speaker 1>for everybody. There is no good that comes from these tariffs,

1:10:47.080 --> 1:10:50.920
<v Speaker 1>hard stop. I don't know how many thousands of different

1:10:50.920 --> 1:10:56.439
<v Speaker 1>ways we can vote that. There's a reason results matter

1:10:56.520 --> 1:10:59.120
<v Speaker 1>more than promises, just like there's a reason Morgan and

1:10:59.200 --> 1:11:02.719
<v Speaker 1>Morgan is America's largest injury law firm. For the last

1:11:02.720 --> 1:11:05.960
<v Speaker 1>thirty five years, they've recovered twenty five billion dollars for

1:11:06.000 --> 1:11:09.240
<v Speaker 1>more than half a million clients. It includes cases where

1:11:09.280 --> 1:11:12.760
<v Speaker 1>insurance companies offered next to nothing, just hoping to get

1:11:12.800 --> 1:11:15.400
<v Speaker 1>away with paying as little as possible. Morgan and Morgan

1:11:15.400 --> 1:11:18.600
<v Speaker 1>fought back ended up winning millions. In fact, in Pennsylvania,

1:11:18.720 --> 1:11:21.880
<v Speaker 1>one client was awarded twenty six million dollars, which was

1:11:21.920 --> 1:11:25.360
<v Speaker 1>a staggering forty times the amount that the insurance company

1:11:25.360 --> 1:11:28.519
<v Speaker 1>originally offered. That original offer six hundred and fifty thousand

1:11:28.560 --> 1:11:31.439
<v Speaker 1>dollars twenty six million, six hundred and fifty thousand dollars.

1:11:31.439 --> 1:11:33.599
<v Speaker 1>So with more than one thousand lawyers across the country,

1:11:33.720 --> 1:11:36.360
<v Speaker 1>they know how to deliver for everyday people. If you're injured,

1:11:36.479 --> 1:11:39.040
<v Speaker 1>you need a lawyer. You need somebody to get your back.

1:11:39.439 --> 1:11:42.800
<v Speaker 1>Check out for Thepeople dot com, Slash podcast or Dow

1:11:42.960 --> 1:11:48.360
<v Speaker 1>Pound Law Pound five to nine law on your cell phone.

1:11:48.400 --> 1:11:50.559
<v Speaker 1>And remember all law firms are not the same. So

1:11:50.680 --> 1:11:53.240
<v Speaker 1>check out Morgan and Morgan. Their fee is free unless

1:11:53.280 --> 1:12:04.960
<v Speaker 1>they win. Before we go a little uh, A few

1:12:04.960 --> 1:12:07.439
<v Speaker 1>things in college football, and look, I don't want to

1:12:07.439 --> 1:12:10.479
<v Speaker 1>I got a few emails about the mess in Michigan.

1:12:11.600 --> 1:12:14.280
<v Speaker 1>And what's uncomfortable about the mess in Michigan is Sharon

1:12:14.400 --> 1:12:19.800
<v Speaker 1>Moore and some in what happened, there is this uncomfortable

1:12:19.840 --> 1:12:23.679
<v Speaker 1>truth there seem to be, you know, in the world

1:12:23.720 --> 1:12:28.080
<v Speaker 1>of college sports right now, if you win, your behavior

1:12:28.120 --> 1:12:30.919
<v Speaker 1>will get They'll find a way to bury your behavior,

1:12:31.000 --> 1:12:33.519
<v Speaker 1>overlook it, or just suspend you a game or two,

1:12:33.920 --> 1:12:35.519
<v Speaker 1>slap you on the wrist. But as long as you

1:12:35.560 --> 1:12:37.840
<v Speaker 1>produce a national title, Jim Harball, nothing is going to

1:12:37.920 --> 1:12:42.920
<v Speaker 1>go wrong. But when things don't go well then and

1:12:43.120 --> 1:12:47.559
<v Speaker 1>and maybe your offense isn't going well, then suddenly people

1:12:47.560 --> 1:12:50.400
<v Speaker 1>have decided that your morals or ethics are a problem.

1:12:50.960 --> 1:12:53.400
<v Speaker 1>And we don't know the full story in Michigan, but

1:12:53.479 --> 1:12:55.800
<v Speaker 1>let's just say I haven't I know enough people in

1:12:55.840 --> 1:13:00.080
<v Speaker 1>the sports industry world, in the world of agents. This

1:13:00.120 --> 1:13:04.600
<v Speaker 1>is not rank speculation, you know, there was there was

1:13:04.640 --> 1:13:08.160
<v Speaker 1>a concerted effort that that more had to go. But

1:13:08.240 --> 1:13:10.120
<v Speaker 1>they needed a reason, in a rationale, and they didn't

1:13:10.120 --> 1:13:12.879
<v Speaker 1>want to spend on the buyout. Now that doesn't excuse

1:13:12.920 --> 1:13:15.960
<v Speaker 1>his behavior. And he and I you know, for the

1:13:16.000 --> 1:13:18.559
<v Speaker 1>life of me, you know, to me, if you're if

1:13:18.560 --> 1:13:22.280
<v Speaker 1>you're going to sleep with an employee at a public institution.

1:13:22.560 --> 1:13:26.360
<v Speaker 1>Your consequences any institution, and you know, you get caught,

1:13:26.400 --> 1:13:28.519
<v Speaker 1>you're going to live with the consequences. And this has

1:13:28.560 --> 1:13:31.080
<v Speaker 1>been a very expensive consequence for him.

1:13:31.760 --> 1:13:32.479
<v Speaker 2>On that front.

1:13:32.840 --> 1:13:37.040
<v Speaker 1>But we need to learn a lot more about when

1:13:37.200 --> 1:13:40.160
<v Speaker 1>was this first known, how, what would this and when

1:13:40.240 --> 1:13:43.719
<v Speaker 1>when did this investigation happen? Why was it cleared once?

1:13:44.400 --> 1:13:44.599
<v Speaker 2>Right?

1:13:44.760 --> 1:13:47.839
<v Speaker 1>Sounds like there was no they had no cooperating evidence,

1:13:47.840 --> 1:13:51.040
<v Speaker 1>and then suddenly they did. Why did this person suddenly

1:13:51.080 --> 1:13:53.559
<v Speaker 1>provide evidence to the school when they did, and why

1:13:53.560 --> 1:13:55.680
<v Speaker 1>didn't they do it before? How is it that it

1:13:55.720 --> 1:13:59.559
<v Speaker 1>conveniently happened after signing day? Anyway, The point is is

1:13:59.600 --> 1:14:03.040
<v Speaker 1>that the corruption of college sports, right, we know, it's

1:14:03.080 --> 1:14:06.400
<v Speaker 1>there's a a. It is a mess. It is ugly,

1:14:06.760 --> 1:14:09.559
<v Speaker 1>it is scandalous, and even an elite institution like the

1:14:09.600 --> 1:14:12.439
<v Speaker 1>University of Michigan is not immune from this. But the

1:14:12.479 --> 1:14:15.320
<v Speaker 1>problem is we have no entity who's going to investigate

1:14:15.320 --> 1:14:17.599
<v Speaker 1>the University of Michigan. Do the NC DOUBLEA have any

1:14:17.640 --> 1:14:20.439
<v Speaker 1>credibility to do this? Will they even listen to the

1:14:20.520 --> 1:14:21.120
<v Speaker 1>NC double A?

1:14:21.439 --> 1:14:21.599
<v Speaker 2>Right?

1:14:21.640 --> 1:14:25.840
<v Speaker 1>When when Michigan was sign stealing, you know they yeah, okay,

1:14:25.880 --> 1:14:29.280
<v Speaker 1>they suspended somebody, they find somebody. But last I checked,

1:14:29.280 --> 1:14:32.840
<v Speaker 1>the University of Michigan won a national title miraculously after

1:14:32.920 --> 1:14:37.160
<v Speaker 1>they've suddenly figured out sign stealing seemed to improve. You know,

1:14:37.240 --> 1:14:39.320
<v Speaker 1>Jim Harbaugh was having a hard time winning nine or

1:14:39.320 --> 1:14:42.040
<v Speaker 1>ten games. Then suddenly they started sign stealing and everything

1:14:42.040 --> 1:14:47.960
<v Speaker 1>got better. So it's a I'm singling out Michigan here

1:14:48.000 --> 1:14:49.920
<v Speaker 1>because I think Michigan is you know, this is sort

1:14:49.920 --> 1:14:52.760
<v Speaker 1>of like, boy, how many how much rotten fish is

1:14:52.760 --> 1:14:55.719
<v Speaker 1>in this program on these different things. But it's really

1:14:56.000 --> 1:14:58.920
<v Speaker 1>this is not about Michigan. This is about the entire sport, right,

1:14:58.960 --> 1:15:01.320
<v Speaker 1>And you know I love it. I love college football.

1:15:01.439 --> 1:15:05.040
<v Speaker 1>You guys know this. I ache for all this pain.

1:15:05.080 --> 1:15:07.880
<v Speaker 1>And look, University Miami, we've been through this. We've had

1:15:07.880 --> 1:15:11.639
<v Speaker 1>our own bad apples do some things in the past,

1:15:12.400 --> 1:15:14.519
<v Speaker 1>don't get me wrong. So I'm not gonna you know,

1:15:14.560 --> 1:15:17.000
<v Speaker 1>this is not a case we all the entire world

1:15:17.080 --> 1:15:20.720
<v Speaker 1>of college football lives in not just a glasshouse. I

1:15:20.720 --> 1:15:24.519
<v Speaker 1>would call it water for crystal houses, if you will, right,

1:15:24.560 --> 1:15:29.600
<v Speaker 1>And there's our broken windows everywhere. But you know, ultimately

1:15:29.600 --> 1:15:32.720
<v Speaker 1>the problem is the conferences have too much power, and

1:15:32.760 --> 1:15:36.879
<v Speaker 1>we need a you need a singular commissioner of college football,

1:15:37.160 --> 1:15:43.080
<v Speaker 1>a singular commissioner of college basketball, a singular commissioner of

1:15:43.080 --> 1:15:46.160
<v Speaker 1>of sort of the for profit sports. Right, we probably

1:15:46.160 --> 1:15:48.639
<v Speaker 1>have to separate it out a little bit, if you will,

1:15:49.000 --> 1:15:51.000
<v Speaker 1>But this the.

1:15:51.000 --> 1:15:51.920
<v Speaker 2>Amount of.

1:15:53.680 --> 1:15:57.360
<v Speaker 1>Influence that agents and boosters now have over and above

1:15:57.520 --> 1:16:02.160
<v Speaker 1>academic leaders or institutionally athletic directors, you name it. You know,

1:16:02.880 --> 1:16:05.080
<v Speaker 1>the athletic directors are not in charge in most of

1:16:05.120 --> 1:16:09.799
<v Speaker 1>these places. It's the person that runs the outside nil

1:16:10.080 --> 1:16:13.120
<v Speaker 1>and raises the hundreds of the tens of millions of

1:16:13.160 --> 1:16:16.920
<v Speaker 1>dollars at these major college institutions need to make payroll.

1:16:18.560 --> 1:16:22.120
<v Speaker 1>They're in charge. The football coaches do not work for

1:16:22.160 --> 1:16:27.679
<v Speaker 1>the university presidents. The football coaches work for the entity

1:16:27.720 --> 1:16:32.400
<v Speaker 1>that has promised to give the most money. I saw

1:16:32.439 --> 1:16:35.320
<v Speaker 1>that at my beloved institution, right some major donors were

1:16:35.320 --> 1:16:37.920
<v Speaker 1>willing to give more money if a certain person was

1:16:38.000 --> 1:16:42.640
<v Speaker 1>hired as coach. That's been true of a lot of institutions.

1:16:44.120 --> 1:16:50.360
<v Speaker 1>So it is the system is broken. It is messed up.

1:16:51.200 --> 1:16:53.760
<v Speaker 1>Perhaps you write rules that maybe allow for this in

1:16:53.800 --> 1:16:56.839
<v Speaker 1>some form, but you've got to have an accepted, shared

1:16:56.880 --> 1:16:58.680
<v Speaker 1>set of rules, and right now we really don't have

1:16:58.720 --> 1:17:04.360
<v Speaker 1>any it is it is only media reports that at

1:17:04.400 --> 1:17:08.040
<v Speaker 1>best create the opportunity for shame to kick in. But

1:17:08.360 --> 1:17:13.519
<v Speaker 1>this is you know, Uh, there's the specifics themselves of

1:17:13.560 --> 1:17:18.439
<v Speaker 1>what happened at Michigan, and then there's the So there

1:17:18.439 --> 1:17:20.839
<v Speaker 1>really needs to be an investigation of how the initial

1:17:20.840 --> 1:17:22.360
<v Speaker 1>investigation happened and how.

1:17:22.280 --> 1:17:24.760
<v Speaker 2>New evidence popped up. That's all I'm going to say here.

1:17:25.479 --> 1:17:30.720
<v Speaker 1>Okay, I I am, I've got I've got plenty of

1:17:30.800 --> 1:17:35.000
<v Speaker 1>interesting sources that have that have told me some interesting

1:17:35.080 --> 1:17:37.760
<v Speaker 1>things about this situation. But the reason it needs to

1:17:37.760 --> 1:17:40.960
<v Speaker 1>be rooted out because it's this is again, Michigan is

1:17:41.040 --> 1:17:46.479
<v Speaker 1>just an example of what is a larger, more broken

1:17:46.760 --> 1:17:50.800
<v Speaker 1>and uh. And I don't think any of us would

1:17:50.840 --> 1:17:53.800
<v Speaker 1>be comfortable finding out what our favorite schools were doing.

1:17:55.280 --> 1:17:57.920
<v Speaker 1>I think there would be I imagine there's not a

1:17:58.000 --> 1:18:01.360
<v Speaker 1>major college football program in America that does things that

1:18:01.400 --> 1:18:05.880
<v Speaker 1>would make every single alum prout, every single fan proud.

1:18:06.479 --> 1:18:10.720
<v Speaker 1>And it is I hate I hate having to defend

1:18:10.880 --> 1:18:13.200
<v Speaker 1>the system at times as a fan because I'd still

1:18:13.240 --> 1:18:16.840
<v Speaker 1>love it. It's still I think college football because of

1:18:16.880 --> 1:18:20.599
<v Speaker 1>the unpredictability of what kid there's still kids, they're still

1:18:20.600 --> 1:18:24.080
<v Speaker 1>growing up they're still learning. There's that unpredictability. There's the

1:18:24.120 --> 1:18:27.360
<v Speaker 1>passion of fan bases, which other than the Steelers and

1:18:27.400 --> 1:18:31.280
<v Speaker 1>the Packers, there's really no you know, maybe Eagles and

1:18:31.320 --> 1:18:35.040
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys too, but there's really the pro fan bases are

1:18:35.040 --> 1:18:39.320
<v Speaker 1>not like college fan bases. They're just different. Hanging out

1:18:39.360 --> 1:18:41.680
<v Speaker 1>with drunk twenty year olds is better to watch than

1:18:41.720 --> 1:18:44.200
<v Speaker 1>hanging out with drunk fifty year olds too, right if

1:18:44.200 --> 1:18:50.280
<v Speaker 1>you're at an NFL game versus a college game. But ultimately,

1:18:50.720 --> 1:18:52.479
<v Speaker 1>we're going to have to have Congress step in. They're

1:18:52.479 --> 1:18:54.840
<v Speaker 1>going to have to give an anti trust exemption in

1:18:54.880 --> 1:18:57.439
<v Speaker 1>some form because they're going to have to create we

1:18:57.520 --> 1:19:01.000
<v Speaker 1>can't have small d democratic tools attempting to govern college sports.

1:19:01.040 --> 1:19:06.120
<v Speaker 1>You're gonna need a commissioner aka some sort of almost

1:19:06.560 --> 1:19:12.120
<v Speaker 1>authoritarian type of situation, chairman of the board, board of director, CEO,

1:19:12.240 --> 1:19:15.160
<v Speaker 1>that sort of thing with some accountability because this is

1:19:15.800 --> 1:19:18.200
<v Speaker 1>this is embarrassing the sport all the time, and there's

1:19:18.200 --> 1:19:20.000
<v Speaker 1>too much money at stake, and we have that much

1:19:20.040 --> 1:19:21.680
<v Speaker 1>money at stake, you're gonna have lawsuit, you're gonna have

1:19:21.720 --> 1:19:23.920
<v Speaker 1>people being libel and all of that stuff. So you

1:19:24.040 --> 1:19:26.880
<v Speaker 1>kind of need a structure and some sort of rule

1:19:26.920 --> 1:19:29.000
<v Speaker 1>of law to govern college sports.

1:19:30.160 --> 1:19:31.120
<v Speaker 2>That is fair. All right.

1:19:31.240 --> 1:19:33.600
<v Speaker 1>I will stop with my rant there, but I felt like,

1:19:33.800 --> 1:19:35.840
<v Speaker 1>as much as I want to celebrate, and I've got

1:19:35.880 --> 1:19:39.880
<v Speaker 1>a lot, I'm going to celebrate on the later this week,

1:19:39.920 --> 1:19:43.000
<v Speaker 1>I will share with you my favorite pathways for Miami

1:19:43.280 --> 1:19:47.760
<v Speaker 1>and the different storylines on different potential matchups that.

1:19:47.680 --> 1:19:49.280
<v Speaker 2>They can have in the college football playoff.

1:19:49.439 --> 1:19:52.960
<v Speaker 1>Let's just say, boy, for Miami's own reputational sake, they

1:19:52.960 --> 1:19:59.120
<v Speaker 1>better win one. They better win one. Uh, and we'll

1:19:59.120 --> 1:20:03.559
<v Speaker 1>go from there. All right, I've gone on a bit now.

1:20:03.600 --> 1:20:06.760
<v Speaker 1>This is a pretty thick Monday episode. We did some dark,

1:20:06.880 --> 1:20:10.479
<v Speaker 1>some light, and everything in between. I really appreciate you listening.

1:20:10.520 --> 1:20:14.000
<v Speaker 1>Our growth has been amazing. I know part of the

1:20:14.040 --> 1:20:16.800
<v Speaker 1>why independent media is growing because you've lost so much

1:20:16.840 --> 1:20:22.520
<v Speaker 1>trust in what's happened with the intimidated corporate owned media,

1:20:22.840 --> 1:20:25.320
<v Speaker 1>which is sad. I have a lot of good friends

1:20:25.360 --> 1:20:27.479
<v Speaker 1>over there who are fighting a good fight, but the

1:20:27.600 --> 1:20:31.120
<v Speaker 1>institutions are just trying to trying to prevent them from

1:20:31.160 --> 1:20:33.439
<v Speaker 1>doing the work that they want to do, which is

1:20:33.479 --> 1:20:36.880
<v Speaker 1>a huge disappointment. But guess what, there are always alternatives,

1:20:37.080 --> 1:20:39.280
<v Speaker 1>including right here, So thank you for listening.

1:20:39.320 --> 1:20:41.320
<v Speaker 2>I appreciate it, and I'll see in forty eight hours.