WEBVTT - What to Do When Paul McCartney Comes Calling

0:00:02.240 --> 0:00:06.800
<v Speaker 1>This is Master's in Business with Barry Ridholts on Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:09.520 --> 0:00:12.040
<v Speaker 1>This week on the podcast, we have a return guest,

0:00:12.200 --> 0:00:15.440
<v Speaker 1>and and what a delight Lawrence Juber one of the

0:00:15.480 --> 0:00:22.400
<v Speaker 1>world's greatest acoustic guitarists, highly regarded by his peers. Everybody

0:00:22.440 --> 0:00:26.360
<v Speaker 1>who I know who is a professional or amateur musician

0:00:26.760 --> 0:00:35.240
<v Speaker 1>or guitarist is in awe of this guy's technical skills, prowess, musicology, musicality.

0:00:35.280 --> 0:00:39.600
<v Speaker 1>He is just a quadruple threat. The work he does

0:00:39.960 --> 0:00:43.800
<v Speaker 1>is really quite fascinating. I found him because I'm such

0:00:43.840 --> 0:00:48.040
<v Speaker 1>a huge Beatles fan, and his cover versions of Paul

0:00:48.120 --> 0:00:54.520
<v Speaker 1>McCartney's Wings and three albums of Beatles songs, it's just

0:00:54.960 --> 0:00:59.080
<v Speaker 1>astonishing and delightful and there's really nothing else, nothing else

0:00:59.160 --> 0:01:02.480
<v Speaker 1>like it. My my recording engineer Medina, was just blown

0:01:02.520 --> 0:01:07.280
<v Speaker 1>away by the version he did of Uh, she Loves You.

0:01:07.560 --> 0:01:10.040
<v Speaker 1>But any of the songs he he does are just

0:01:10.120 --> 0:01:15.080
<v Speaker 1>so unique to him and yet so obviously a Beatles song.

0:01:15.120 --> 0:01:18.840
<v Speaker 1>They're just just amazing. And what's really fascinating is the

0:01:18.959 --> 0:01:23.080
<v Speaker 1>depth of his musical knowledge and his understanding of the

0:01:23.240 --> 0:01:27.080
<v Speaker 1>history of both the guitar as an instrument and the

0:01:27.200 --> 0:01:31.160
<v Speaker 1>history of music and how it's developed. It's it's really fascinating.

0:01:31.319 --> 0:01:34.000
<v Speaker 1>I love his work. I find him fascinating. I was

0:01:34.040 --> 0:01:36.360
<v Speaker 1>thrilled to be able to sit here and and listen

0:01:36.400 --> 0:01:39.400
<v Speaker 1>to him. Um. I recorded two of his songs and

0:01:39.440 --> 0:01:42.280
<v Speaker 1>I put them up on YouTube. One of the Beatles.

0:01:42.280 --> 0:01:46.199
<v Speaker 1>The other is Little Wing, which is just insane version

0:01:46.240 --> 0:01:49.760
<v Speaker 1>of that song. So, with no further ado, here is

0:01:49.800 --> 0:01:58.240
<v Speaker 1>my conversation with Lawrence Duber, my extra special guest today,

0:01:58.760 --> 0:02:01.400
<v Speaker 1>is one of my very every musicians in the world.

0:02:01.960 --> 0:02:05.040
<v Speaker 1>His name is Lawrence Juber. He was born and raised

0:02:05.080 --> 0:02:10.440
<v Speaker 1>in London, uh Immediately upon graduation from university, began working

0:02:10.480 --> 0:02:13.360
<v Speaker 1>as a session guitarist with a little known producer named

0:02:13.840 --> 0:02:18.120
<v Speaker 1>George Martin. He was a studio musician on thousands of

0:02:18.160 --> 0:02:22.560
<v Speaker 1>sessions before he was invited by Sir Paul McCartney's band

0:02:22.560 --> 0:02:26.240
<v Speaker 1>Wings for their ninety eight tour. That's really what brought

0:02:26.320 --> 0:02:30.760
<v Speaker 1>him to wider spread public notice. He has recorded twenty

0:02:30.760 --> 0:02:34.519
<v Speaker 1>five solo albums, many of which have received critical acclaim.

0:02:34.600 --> 0:02:38.800
<v Speaker 1>He has won two Grammys. He was named top acoustic

0:02:38.840 --> 0:02:43.040
<v Speaker 1>guitar player of all time by Acoustic Guitar Magazine and

0:02:43.120 --> 0:02:46.919
<v Speaker 1>has been called a master of the acoustic guitar by

0:02:46.960 --> 0:02:51.560
<v Speaker 1>no less than the Who's Peter Townsend, Lawrence Juber. Welcome

0:02:51.560 --> 0:02:55.399
<v Speaker 1>back to Bloomberg. Happy to be here. So we could

0:02:55.440 --> 0:03:00.560
<v Speaker 1>do the whole conversation with you, just answering music without

0:03:01.440 --> 0:03:04.880
<v Speaker 1>so before we get into the specifics, I have to

0:03:05.000 --> 0:03:08.560
<v Speaker 1>give you kudos. The last time you were here and

0:03:08.639 --> 0:03:12.440
<v Speaker 1>people I did not mention that you're also a musicologist.

0:03:13.000 --> 0:03:17.519
<v Speaker 1>We had a long conversation about what was the copyright

0:03:17.560 --> 0:03:22.840
<v Speaker 1>suit against led Zeppelin to Heaven, and you very specifically said,

0:03:23.360 --> 0:03:27.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't see how both of them, meaning Zeppelin and

0:03:27.840 --> 0:03:33.840
<v Speaker 1>the plaintiff didn't steal the music from this, this classical

0:03:34.000 --> 0:03:37.320
<v Speaker 1>piece of work from the fifteen hundreds or sixteen hundred.

0:03:38.240 --> 0:03:40.560
<v Speaker 1>And it turned out the court more or less agreed

0:03:40.640 --> 0:03:42.760
<v Speaker 1>with you. It was basically it was a public domain

0:03:44.560 --> 0:03:47.040
<v Speaker 1>and you can't steal. But you've got to look at

0:03:47.040 --> 0:03:51.000
<v Speaker 1>the context in terms of led Zeppelin, that they were

0:03:51.080 --> 0:03:57.480
<v Speaker 1>in the habit of purloining existing material. Oh really, that

0:03:57.560 --> 0:04:00.760
<v Speaker 1>was I mean, one can one can look at that,

0:04:00.760 --> 0:04:04.160
<v Speaker 1>but it's not uncommon when you say proloining. There's a

0:04:04.200 --> 0:04:09.640
<v Speaker 1>difference between inspired by and stolen front and like having

0:04:09.680 --> 0:04:12.800
<v Speaker 1>to add other composers to the credits down the line

0:04:12.880 --> 0:04:15.240
<v Speaker 1>when they got caught out. We just saw that happened

0:04:15.280 --> 0:04:18.240
<v Speaker 1>recently with with blurred Lines, and we saw that not

0:04:18.320 --> 0:04:22.120
<v Speaker 1>too long ago with another big song, Birdlines. Bloodlines is

0:04:22.120 --> 0:04:24.560
<v Speaker 1>a weird one. Yeah, I was surprised by that. It

0:04:24.600 --> 0:04:27.240
<v Speaker 1>was almost like the drum line was well, yeah, the

0:04:27.279 --> 0:04:29.520
<v Speaker 1>thing that the weird thing about it was the judge

0:04:29.560 --> 0:04:33.120
<v Speaker 1>didn't allow the record to be played, and yet it

0:04:33.240 --> 0:04:36.240
<v Speaker 1>was the groove on the record that was actually what

0:04:36.360 --> 0:04:39.440
<v Speaker 1>had been taken. And you know, if that was the case,

0:04:39.520 --> 0:04:43.000
<v Speaker 1>if groove was the issue, you know, Bo Diddley would

0:04:43.000 --> 0:04:48.880
<v Speaker 1>have been a multimillionaire on the basis of everybody from him,

0:04:48.880 --> 0:04:52.640
<v Speaker 1>whereas like Chuck Berry actually did get you know, did

0:04:53.400 --> 0:04:58.839
<v Speaker 1>get compensated for Beach Boys, you know, surfing USA taking,

0:04:58.920 --> 0:05:01.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, and John and and got sued, you know

0:05:01.480 --> 0:05:04.400
<v Speaker 1>because here comes on the flat top, you know, and um,

0:05:04.800 --> 0:05:08.000
<v Speaker 1>it's from you Can't Catch Me. It's did he lose? Yeah,

0:05:08.040 --> 0:05:11.120
<v Speaker 1>he loves that. And obviously George Harrison, well, but George

0:05:11.120 --> 0:05:15.400
<v Speaker 1>Harrison was really weird because Alan Klein owned the publishing

0:05:15.440 --> 0:05:18.880
<v Speaker 1>catalog for both that for both songs, so he was

0:05:18.920 --> 0:05:24.680
<v Speaker 1>basically himself yeah, that can that happens my my my

0:05:24.760 --> 0:05:28.560
<v Speaker 1>brother in law, Ross Handles, has handled the Beach Boys

0:05:29.520 --> 0:05:32.480
<v Speaker 1>record company for a while and there was one particular lawsuit,

0:05:32.520 --> 0:05:34.599
<v Speaker 1>you know, there's all this intrigue within the Beach Boys,

0:05:34.960 --> 0:05:38.200
<v Speaker 1>you know where Al al Jardine was on both sides

0:05:38.560 --> 0:05:41.599
<v Speaker 1>of a lawsuit. He was basically suing himself and the

0:05:41.680 --> 0:05:44.760
<v Speaker 1>judge pointed that out. So the problem with that is

0:05:44.800 --> 0:05:46.920
<v Speaker 1>that your legal costs or twice as much, but you're

0:05:46.920 --> 0:05:50.400
<v Speaker 1>guaranteed to win. That's right. So you lose, so you

0:05:50.440 --> 0:05:53.039
<v Speaker 1>can lose, but you can also win. So so is

0:05:53.080 --> 0:05:56.400
<v Speaker 1>this an ongoing problem with copyright issues and music? You

0:05:56.440 --> 0:06:00.200
<v Speaker 1>would think that everything is always based loosely on what

0:06:00.320 --> 0:06:02.640
<v Speaker 1>came before. Well, there is that, I mean, there are

0:06:02.760 --> 0:06:06.960
<v Speaker 1>there are elements that the substance of music is in

0:06:07.000 --> 0:06:09.560
<v Speaker 1>the public domain. I mean very simply. You know, you

0:06:09.640 --> 0:06:13.400
<v Speaker 1>take a string is a guitar straight and you touch

0:06:13.440 --> 0:06:17.720
<v Speaker 1>it halfway. You have an octave, You touch it in thirds,

0:06:18.160 --> 0:06:23.159
<v Speaker 1>you have a fifth, fourth, five, and then you you

0:06:23.279 --> 0:06:25.160
<v Speaker 1>keep going up there and you get what's called the

0:06:25.200 --> 0:06:30.920
<v Speaker 1>harmonic series. And out of that harmonic series you build chords,

0:06:31.279 --> 0:06:36.920
<v Speaker 1>you build melodies. The building blocks are pretty fundamental and

0:06:37.080 --> 0:06:39.640
<v Speaker 1>how you arrange those building blocks and do it in

0:06:39.640 --> 0:06:43.680
<v Speaker 1>a way to avoid stepping on somebody else's copyright is

0:06:43.720 --> 0:06:47.080
<v Speaker 1>the challenge. And in in the songwriting world, the the

0:06:47.080 --> 0:06:51.280
<v Speaker 1>the the adage is right a hit, get it rid

0:06:52.320 --> 0:06:57.560
<v Speaker 1>because the well you saw the Tom Petty song sounded

0:06:57.760 --> 0:06:59.960
<v Speaker 1>so much so, and I bet you that he didn't

0:07:00.080 --> 0:07:05.520
<v Speaker 1>actually copy here. It was just simply that that's kind

0:07:05.560 --> 0:07:07.920
<v Speaker 1>of a progression that you and I mean that there

0:07:07.920 --> 0:07:10.480
<v Speaker 1>were some Australian guys that put together a YouTube video

0:07:11.040 --> 0:07:14.040
<v Speaker 1>where they took dozens of songs, all of which were

0:07:14.120 --> 0:07:16.360
<v Speaker 1>number one records, and all had exactly the same court

0:07:16.400 --> 0:07:20.080
<v Speaker 1>sequence because there's no copyright on the court sequence copyright

0:07:20.440 --> 0:07:24.080
<v Speaker 1>strictly speaking copyrights on melody and lyrics, so in the

0:07:24.080 --> 0:07:27.160
<v Speaker 1>case of blurred lines, they were going outside of the

0:07:27.200 --> 0:07:29.200
<v Speaker 1>bounds of that. And what you end up with is

0:07:29.200 --> 0:07:36.440
<v Speaker 1>is just aggressive proactive musicologists finding lawyers and lawyers that

0:07:36.560 --> 0:07:39.120
<v Speaker 1>they team up with that that can really muddy the

0:07:39.160 --> 0:07:42.240
<v Speaker 1>waters with all of it. What was the talking pacabell

0:07:42.480 --> 0:07:45.280
<v Speaker 1>Cannons and geek that everybody said that that a lot

0:07:45.320 --> 0:07:51.400
<v Speaker 1>of songs have loosely been based on It's a similar sequence.

0:07:51.440 --> 0:07:58.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean that's the pacabell But for example, you know,

0:07:58.800 --> 0:08:12.200
<v Speaker 1>these kind of sequences is not uncommon, so you get

0:08:12.240 --> 0:08:23.280
<v Speaker 1>that that sequence. So many songs, you know, like Journey,

0:08:23.440 --> 0:08:26.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, Don't Stop Believing is based on that. But

0:08:26.200 --> 0:08:30.120
<v Speaker 1>it's not a copyright herble thing. That substance of it

0:08:29.800 --> 0:08:32.640
<v Speaker 1>is just is truly in the public domain. It's how

0:08:32.720 --> 0:08:35.439
<v Speaker 1>you articulate it. It's what lyrics you put to it,

0:08:35.840 --> 0:08:39.400
<v Speaker 1>what you do melodically, and how much of a melody

0:08:40.280 --> 0:08:43.400
<v Speaker 1>is the same as something else. My special guest today

0:08:43.520 --> 0:08:47.400
<v Speaker 1>is Lawrence Duber. He played with Sir Paul McCartney and

0:08:47.400 --> 0:08:51.000
<v Speaker 1>Wings on tour in the late seventies and recorded too,

0:08:51.040 --> 0:08:53.640
<v Speaker 1>And what did you record with them? I'm back to

0:08:53.679 --> 0:08:56.680
<v Speaker 1>the Egg album. What's the big song from that? The

0:08:56.760 --> 0:08:59.600
<v Speaker 1>single that was contemporaneous with that was coming up, It

0:08:59.760 --> 0:09:03.480
<v Speaker 1>was good Night Tonight and then it was getting closer

0:09:03.480 --> 0:09:07.280
<v Speaker 1>and arrow through me that that period the late like

0:09:07.400 --> 0:09:09.600
<v Speaker 1>the Indian Summer of Wings as they call it. But

0:09:09.640 --> 0:09:12.520
<v Speaker 1>then after that coming because the last Wings number one

0:09:12.559 --> 0:09:17.440
<v Speaker 1>was coming up, which was live and that you're playing

0:09:17.480 --> 0:09:19.800
<v Speaker 1>with George Martin, You're doing a lot of session work.

0:09:20.320 --> 0:09:23.920
<v Speaker 1>What's it like when the call comes from McCartney, Hey,

0:09:23.960 --> 0:09:27.000
<v Speaker 1>I need a guitarist for the next tour. It didn't

0:09:27.280 --> 0:09:29.840
<v Speaker 1>quite come that way. I had been playing on a

0:09:29.840 --> 0:09:32.640
<v Speaker 1>TV show with David Essex, was big English pop star

0:09:32.720 --> 0:09:34.160
<v Speaker 1>at the time, and each week they would have a

0:09:34.200 --> 0:09:37.520
<v Speaker 1>different musical guest. So one week was Twiggy, which was

0:09:37.559 --> 0:09:39.960
<v Speaker 1>kind of fun. They did send in the clowns together

0:09:40.520 --> 0:09:43.440
<v Speaker 1>Um Ronnie Specter the next week. Then the next week

0:09:43.480 --> 0:09:46.199
<v Speaker 1>was Denny Lane, and Denny was one of the founding

0:09:46.200 --> 0:09:51.000
<v Speaker 1>member of Wings with Paul and Linda and Um had

0:09:51.640 --> 0:09:54.079
<v Speaker 1>originally been the lead singer with the Moody Blues and

0:09:54.440 --> 0:09:56.679
<v Speaker 1>We did Go Now, which was a big Moody Blues hit.

0:09:57.440 --> 0:10:01.400
<v Speaker 1>UM and Denny liked my playing and we kind of bonded.

0:10:01.840 --> 0:10:04.319
<v Speaker 1>And then a couple of months after I ran into

0:10:04.400 --> 0:10:08.200
<v Speaker 1>him at a London studio where Paul and Linda were

0:10:08.240 --> 0:10:11.800
<v Speaker 1>working with him, and then he introduced me, but there

0:10:11.880 --> 0:10:14.760
<v Speaker 1>was still I mean, this was kind of September October

0:10:14.840 --> 0:10:17.360
<v Speaker 1>of seventy seven. I got the call in April of

0:10:17.440 --> 0:10:20.240
<v Speaker 1>seventy eight, so it wasn't like an overnight thing, and

0:10:20.280 --> 0:10:23.440
<v Speaker 1>I was very entrenched as a studio musician. I had

0:10:23.480 --> 0:10:26.840
<v Speaker 1>that would been my ambition from the time I was thirteen. Now,

0:10:26.840 --> 0:10:29.280
<v Speaker 1>of course, if I knew then what I know now,

0:10:29.920 --> 0:10:33.080
<v Speaker 1>I would have oriented myself to be being a songwriters

0:10:33.120 --> 0:10:36.200
<v Speaker 1>a lot more money at that. But nonetheless, my my

0:10:36.280 --> 0:10:38.160
<v Speaker 1>goal was to play guitar and make a living doing

0:10:38.240 --> 0:10:41.600
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to be a professional guitar player, whatever that took,

0:10:41.679 --> 0:10:45.040
<v Speaker 1>being in top forty bands, playing in jazz bands. I

0:10:45.080 --> 0:10:49.240
<v Speaker 1>played in the National Uth Jazz Orchestra. I'd established myself

0:10:49.440 --> 0:10:52.560
<v Speaker 1>and I was working at abbey Road in the Iconic

0:10:52.600 --> 0:10:55.920
<v Speaker 1>studio to the Beatles Studio on a session and I

0:10:55.960 --> 0:10:58.240
<v Speaker 1>got a phone call. Now getting a phone call on

0:10:58.280 --> 0:11:02.040
<v Speaker 1>a session at abbey Road was usual. This is for

0:11:02.040 --> 0:11:05.080
<v Speaker 1>for the younger listeners. Back then. We didn't all have

0:11:05.120 --> 0:11:09.559
<v Speaker 1>cell phones. It was literally white courtesy phone. Lawrence Juber

0:11:10.040 --> 0:11:12.880
<v Speaker 1>coming in for you, and the phone was up in

0:11:12.920 --> 0:11:15.679
<v Speaker 1>the next of the control room. And there's a big

0:11:15.720 --> 0:11:18.080
<v Speaker 1>long staircase. And you never went up there as as

0:11:18.120 --> 0:11:22.240
<v Speaker 1>a musician, you know, you stayed down stayed downstairs on

0:11:22.280 --> 0:11:24.559
<v Speaker 1>the studio floor. But I had to go up. And

0:11:24.600 --> 0:11:26.920
<v Speaker 1>I've never seen the control room before. So go up

0:11:26.960 --> 0:11:29.040
<v Speaker 1>in the control room, go take the phone call, and

0:11:29.040 --> 0:11:35.199
<v Speaker 1>it's McCartney's office as MPL and the guy says, Jenny

0:11:35.240 --> 0:11:37.400
<v Speaker 1>wants to know if you can come and jam on Monday,

0:11:37.480 --> 0:11:39.720
<v Speaker 1>and oh, by the way, Paul and Linda will be there.

0:11:40.080 --> 0:11:42.320
<v Speaker 1>And as it happens, I was free, thank goodness. And

0:11:42.360 --> 0:11:44.880
<v Speaker 1>if you weren't, if I wasn't, I would have made myself.

0:11:46.400 --> 0:11:49.480
<v Speaker 1>And I kind of went into a slight panic because

0:11:49.480 --> 0:11:51.360
<v Speaker 1>I didn't really know any of the Wings stuff. You know,

0:11:51.600 --> 0:11:53.320
<v Speaker 1>at that time, I was into being a hot shot

0:11:53.480 --> 0:11:56.600
<v Speaker 1>studio player, and it wasn't. I was listening to pop records,

0:11:56.640 --> 0:11:59.560
<v Speaker 1>but you know, there weren't a lot of guitar solos

0:11:59.600 --> 0:12:01.439
<v Speaker 1>on the Wing records, and now that was the thing,

0:12:01.600 --> 0:12:04.200
<v Speaker 1>you know. I was much more into more of the

0:12:04.200 --> 0:12:09.920
<v Speaker 1>progressive FUSIONI Staff and Weather Report and UM returned to Forever,

0:12:10.000 --> 0:12:12.680
<v Speaker 1>and I was listening to like Chick Career and then

0:12:12.720 --> 0:12:16.000
<v Speaker 1>like Los Angeles guitar players like Larry Carton, Lee Written On,

0:12:16.120 --> 0:12:19.319
<v Speaker 1>you know, those kind of like jazz guy, fusion guy

0:12:19.400 --> 0:12:23.320
<v Speaker 1>studio players and UM. But so I brought some LPs

0:12:23.360 --> 0:12:26.040
<v Speaker 1>from my brother and listened over the weekend. But I

0:12:26.040 --> 0:12:27.800
<v Speaker 1>realized there was no way I was going to be

0:12:27.840 --> 0:12:29.559
<v Speaker 1>able to anticipate what we were going to do, and

0:12:29.600 --> 0:12:31.560
<v Speaker 1>as it turned out, we jammed on some chuck Berry

0:12:31.600 --> 0:12:35.439
<v Speaker 1>grooves and some reggae kind of field things, and they said,

0:12:35.480 --> 0:12:38.040
<v Speaker 1>what are you doing for the next few years, at

0:12:38.040 --> 0:12:39.800
<v Speaker 1>which point I had to think about it deeply for

0:12:39.840 --> 0:12:44.160
<v Speaker 1>a nano second, because you know, I'd established myself so

0:12:44.280 --> 0:12:46.080
<v Speaker 1>when I worked really hard and I was making a

0:12:46.160 --> 0:12:49.840
<v Speaker 1>decent living doing it, but I couldn't turn down the

0:12:49.840 --> 0:12:53.360
<v Speaker 1>opportunity to work with Paul McCartney. So you know, I said, well,

0:12:53.640 --> 0:12:56.400
<v Speaker 1>I guess I'm playing with you. I think the rule

0:12:56.440 --> 0:12:58.400
<v Speaker 1>of thumb is when Paul McCartney says, what are you

0:12:58.440 --> 0:13:02.400
<v Speaker 1>doing for the next few years, you tell me exactly.

0:13:03.240 --> 0:13:07.200
<v Speaker 1>So it was it was a big change now, but

0:13:07.440 --> 0:13:11.120
<v Speaker 1>personally it happened at a really crucial point in my

0:13:11.200 --> 0:13:14.000
<v Speaker 1>life because my father passed away a month earlier, so

0:13:14.720 --> 0:13:18.640
<v Speaker 1>it was a very kind of emotionally wrenching period. And

0:13:19.240 --> 0:13:21.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, to then step into the situation where not

0:13:21.640 --> 0:13:24.040
<v Speaker 1>only was I working for Paul, but he was kind

0:13:24.040 --> 0:13:27.240
<v Speaker 1>of an artistic mentor as well, and it really was.

0:13:27.440 --> 0:13:30.240
<v Speaker 1>It became an extension of my education because I had

0:13:30.240 --> 0:13:34.120
<v Speaker 1>studied London University got about your music degree in musicology

0:13:34.120 --> 0:13:37.920
<v Speaker 1>and music theory. I never really studied guitar formally, except

0:13:38.360 --> 0:13:41.840
<v Speaker 1>in high school. I had classical guitar lessons, but it

0:13:41.920 --> 0:13:45.720
<v Speaker 1>wasn't my ambition to be a classical guitar player. It

0:13:45.800 --> 0:13:49.600
<v Speaker 1>was simply a way to have the necessary grade level

0:13:49.880 --> 0:13:52.960
<v Speaker 1>in performance to be able to continue to study music theory,

0:13:53.080 --> 0:13:56.000
<v Speaker 1>because what intrigued me was the way that music was

0:13:56.040 --> 0:13:59.880
<v Speaker 1>put together, and watching you play various songs, it's clear

0:14:00.600 --> 0:14:03.319
<v Speaker 1>that you don't just pick up a guitar and strum.

0:14:03.360 --> 0:14:07.280
<v Speaker 1>All of the compositions I've seen you perform have been

0:14:07.320 --> 0:14:13.400
<v Speaker 1>constructed painstakingly with great a forethought, if that's even a word.

0:14:13.840 --> 0:14:17.440
<v Speaker 1>But it's clear that these aren't just oh, let me

0:14:17.520 --> 0:14:21.240
<v Speaker 1>run off a few riffs. You really spend time charting

0:14:21.280 --> 0:14:23.840
<v Speaker 1>these things out in great theme, figuring out how all

0:14:23.880 --> 0:14:26.640
<v Speaker 1>the parts work together. I mean, that's that's the challenge,

0:14:26.760 --> 0:14:31.120
<v Speaker 1>that's the technique. So McCartney's and Linda say to you, hey,

0:14:31.200 --> 0:14:34.720
<v Speaker 1>let's go on tour. What's actually not not straight away? No,

0:14:35.360 --> 0:14:37.320
<v Speaker 1>first thing that happens when we went up to Scotland

0:14:37.400 --> 0:14:41.080
<v Speaker 1>to his farm and spent a few weeks just working

0:14:41.200 --> 0:14:45.280
<v Speaker 1>through potential material for an album. So before we're even

0:14:45.320 --> 0:14:49.720
<v Speaker 1>rehearsing for the tour came away date way later because

0:14:49.760 --> 0:14:52.400
<v Speaker 1>he owed he had just signed with Columbia Records, had

0:14:52.400 --> 0:14:56.040
<v Speaker 1>been on Capitol for years. Signed with Columbia as a

0:14:56.080 --> 0:14:59.280
<v Speaker 1>signing bonus, he got a great deal on the Frank

0:14:59.440 --> 0:15:04.320
<v Speaker 1>Music CBS Songs Frank Music catalog, which included Greece, chorus

0:15:04.360 --> 0:15:06.920
<v Speaker 1>Line and Annie, all of which got made into movies

0:15:06.960 --> 0:15:10.760
<v Speaker 1>within a year of him acquiring those copyrights. Yeah, hit,

0:15:10.760 --> 0:15:13.320
<v Speaker 1>Paul was well on the way to becoming the largest

0:15:13.360 --> 0:15:16.840
<v Speaker 1>independent music publisher in the world. Because if Linda's father,

0:15:17.000 --> 0:15:20.280
<v Speaker 1>Lee represented a lot of the composers. Lee Eastman was

0:15:20.880 --> 0:15:25.000
<v Speaker 1>big time, big time music lawyer, and in fact, after

0:15:25.040 --> 0:15:27.000
<v Speaker 1>we had spent some time in Scotland and we shot

0:15:27.000 --> 0:15:30.360
<v Speaker 1>a video from an existing track, we then came to

0:15:30.440 --> 0:15:33.160
<v Speaker 1>New York, went out to Long Island, out to the

0:15:33.200 --> 0:15:37.200
<v Speaker 1>Hampton's and spent a few days getting to know chat

0:15:37.240 --> 0:15:39.760
<v Speaker 1>about the business end of it with with Lee Eastman,

0:15:39.800 --> 0:15:43.520
<v Speaker 1>which was pretty impressive, I have to say. And then

0:15:43.720 --> 0:15:45.960
<v Speaker 1>we went back to England and then went up to

0:15:46.000 --> 0:15:49.920
<v Speaker 1>Scotland again and started recording an album, which we continued

0:15:49.960 --> 0:15:51.680
<v Speaker 1>to do in Scotland, and then we went down to

0:15:51.680 --> 0:15:54.920
<v Speaker 1>a castle on the South coast of England, Limb Castle,

0:15:54.920 --> 0:15:58.800
<v Speaker 1>which like a thirteenth century with battlements and ghosts and

0:15:59.280 --> 0:16:01.960
<v Speaker 1>spiral stay cases. It was great. And then we went

0:16:02.000 --> 0:16:04.640
<v Speaker 1>into Abbey Road and did some recording there and ended

0:16:04.720 --> 0:16:08.160
<v Speaker 1>up actually in the basement of Paul's studio, Paul's office

0:16:08.720 --> 0:16:12.400
<v Speaker 1>in Soho Square, London, one Soho Square, which is like

0:16:12.600 --> 0:16:16.280
<v Speaker 1>a great addressed and we built a replica of the

0:16:16.280 --> 0:16:18.680
<v Speaker 1>control room of Abbey Road studio too so that we

0:16:18.720 --> 0:16:21.600
<v Speaker 1>could mix the album because we couldn't get into Abbey

0:16:21.640 --> 0:16:24.320
<v Speaker 1>Row because Kate Bush I think Cliff Richard and Kate

0:16:24.360 --> 0:16:27.360
<v Speaker 1>Busch were using it and we couldn't get the studio

0:16:27.400 --> 0:16:29.840
<v Speaker 1>that we wanted, so we just Paul created his own.

0:16:30.040 --> 0:16:32.840
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk a little bit about the business of music.

0:16:32.920 --> 0:16:36.600
<v Speaker 1>You mentioned you were happy earning a living as a

0:16:36.680 --> 0:16:40.680
<v Speaker 1>studio musician. Do those careers still exists to the same

0:16:40.680 --> 0:16:44.240
<v Speaker 1>degree they used to? They do to some extent, I mean,

0:16:44.480 --> 0:16:47.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, the union a for them used to have

0:16:47.160 --> 0:16:50.520
<v Speaker 1>a lot of cloud and in some areas it still does.

0:16:50.680 --> 0:16:55.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean in television movies as long as their studio movies.

0:16:55.280 --> 0:16:58.479
<v Speaker 1>This you know, and and it certainly can be rewarding,

0:16:59.440 --> 0:17:02.920
<v Speaker 1>but it's not as reliable a source of income as

0:17:02.960 --> 0:17:07.240
<v Speaker 1>it was even twenty years ago. I mean it really

0:17:07.560 --> 0:17:10.359
<v Speaker 1>the amount of that kind of work has diminished because

0:17:10.440 --> 0:17:14.359
<v Speaker 1>the technology has had an enormous impact. Whereas it used

0:17:14.400 --> 0:17:16.680
<v Speaker 1>to be that you'd have to put together an orchestra

0:17:17.080 --> 0:17:18.760
<v Speaker 1>to do a score, and now you can do it,

0:17:18.840 --> 0:17:22.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, in your bedroom basically, um with a laptop.

0:17:23.359 --> 0:17:26.840
<v Speaker 1>So it doesn't necessarily have the same dimension to it.

0:17:27.000 --> 0:17:29.720
<v Speaker 1>But then you know, that depends on the budget. But

0:17:29.720 --> 0:17:34.000
<v Speaker 1>but being a studio musician is was always really going

0:17:34.000 --> 0:17:37.920
<v Speaker 1>back to the twenties, was a viable way of making

0:17:37.920 --> 0:17:40.639
<v Speaker 1>a living, just not nearly as much as it was

0:17:41.240 --> 0:17:43.560
<v Speaker 1>not nearly as much today as it once was. Correct,

0:17:43.640 --> 0:17:45.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, now really we had the money. Is is

0:17:45.800 --> 0:17:48.639
<v Speaker 1>in the songwriting and my daughter Elsie, for example, is

0:17:48.760 --> 0:17:52.720
<v Speaker 1>has becoming a successful songwriter, and I see how it

0:17:52.760 --> 0:17:56.879
<v Speaker 1>works for her in terms of and it's not just records.

0:17:57.040 --> 0:18:00.520
<v Speaker 1>It's not just records and television streaming is streaming is

0:18:00.560 --> 0:18:04.119
<v Speaker 1>not a great source of revenue for songwriters. For performers,

0:18:04.119 --> 0:18:07.120
<v Speaker 1>it's better the ratio for they find something of mine

0:18:07.200 --> 0:18:12.960
<v Speaker 1>gets played on serious example, Pandora. Hopefully Pandora will still

0:18:13.000 --> 0:18:15.840
<v Speaker 1>be around for a while if it gets played there.

0:18:16.520 --> 0:18:20.800
<v Speaker 1>I make seventeen times as much as a performer as

0:18:20.840 --> 0:18:24.200
<v Speaker 1>I would as the as the writer publishing. Does that

0:18:24.320 --> 0:18:26.520
<v Speaker 1>make any sense? That seems it makes sense if you're

0:18:26.520 --> 0:18:30.000
<v Speaker 1>the performer, but if you're the performer writer, I guess

0:18:30.000 --> 0:18:33.240
<v Speaker 1>there's a certain comma involved because performers never got and

0:18:33.280 --> 0:18:36.399
<v Speaker 1>still don't get money from terrestrial radio at all. It

0:18:36.480 --> 0:18:40.800
<v Speaker 1>was always looked at as promotional and not exactly exactly.

0:18:41.400 --> 0:18:44.399
<v Speaker 1>It's free promotion for your concerts, but that which is

0:18:44.440 --> 0:18:47.040
<v Speaker 1>why it used to be free promotion for your albums.

0:18:47.280 --> 0:18:50.600
<v Speaker 1>Well before that was free promotion for your live performances.

0:18:50.960 --> 0:18:53.720
<v Speaker 1>So we went from live performances as a big source

0:18:53.760 --> 0:18:56.600
<v Speaker 1>of income to albums album and now we're back to

0:18:56.640 --> 0:19:01.719
<v Speaker 1>live performances to a largic live performances and T shirts,

0:19:02.040 --> 0:19:05.600
<v Speaker 1>merchandise um and and CDs have you know, dropped off

0:19:05.640 --> 0:19:08.240
<v Speaker 1>a lot, but you know, show merchandise in terms. I mean,

0:19:08.600 --> 0:19:10.679
<v Speaker 1>you've seen me at my shows, you know, with with

0:19:10.760 --> 0:19:13.119
<v Speaker 1>a stack of CDs and a line of people running

0:19:13.160 --> 0:19:17.840
<v Speaker 1>signatures and stuff. So that's that's a away And it's

0:19:17.880 --> 0:19:19.919
<v Speaker 1>great because I would get to meet the fans, but

0:19:20.000 --> 0:19:24.080
<v Speaker 1>I also get to hand over the work you know

0:19:24.119 --> 0:19:28.280
<v Speaker 1>the artistic work. But but the real money in songwriting

0:19:28.320 --> 0:19:32.000
<v Speaker 1>is in first of all, is in radio, airplay and

0:19:32.080 --> 0:19:37.200
<v Speaker 1>television and synchronization licenses. So a song, I mean, for example,

0:19:37.240 --> 0:19:41.240
<v Speaker 1>else co wrote Fireball for Pitball and that got used

0:19:42.160 --> 0:19:45.240
<v Speaker 1>big song got used on Dancing with the Stars. They

0:19:45.280 --> 0:19:48.719
<v Speaker 1>pay a synchronization license for the right to use it,

0:19:48.800 --> 0:19:52.320
<v Speaker 1>and then b m I collect performance royalties for it.

0:19:52.480 --> 0:19:55.520
<v Speaker 1>So there are revenue streams that develop out of that. UM.

0:19:56.920 --> 0:20:00.280
<v Speaker 1>Cell phone company might license it or CBS, you know

0:20:00.480 --> 0:20:03.600
<v Speaker 1>se Um. She also co wrote a song for Major

0:20:03.680 --> 0:20:07.560
<v Speaker 1>Laser called Powerful and CBS Television we're using it as

0:20:07.600 --> 0:20:11.439
<v Speaker 1>background for promos for upcoming shows, so they pay a

0:20:11.480 --> 0:20:14.840
<v Speaker 1>license fee for that that generates b m I UM.

0:20:14.920 --> 0:20:19.440
<v Speaker 1>So there are there are solid revenue streams that come

0:20:19.520 --> 0:20:23.920
<v Speaker 1>from that kind of activity. UM. And that's really where

0:20:23.920 --> 0:20:28.280
<v Speaker 1>the music publishes, you know, that's that's their lifeblood, is

0:20:28.400 --> 0:20:31.199
<v Speaker 1>that kind of activity, and it's worth their while to

0:20:31.280 --> 0:20:35.320
<v Speaker 1>have a roster of successful songwriters that who's publishing they administer,

0:20:36.119 --> 0:20:39.159
<v Speaker 1>and that you know, publishing is typically kind of a

0:20:39.160 --> 0:20:42.800
<v Speaker 1>a lot of pennies that add up to a substantial stream.

0:20:42.840 --> 0:20:44.840
<v Speaker 1>So so the thought of a couple of people getting

0:20:44.880 --> 0:20:47.520
<v Speaker 1>together in a garage, recording an album, going on tour

0:20:49.680 --> 0:20:52.280
<v Speaker 1>still a viable business model, and there are people that

0:20:52.320 --> 0:20:55.560
<v Speaker 1>are doing that, especially if they get good social media support,

0:20:55.760 --> 0:20:58.800
<v Speaker 1>who can actually make some decent money. And I hear

0:20:58.880 --> 0:21:01.720
<v Speaker 1>rumor of people that actually make money out of YouTube videos.

0:21:01.800 --> 0:21:04.439
<v Speaker 1>But but the reality of it is that YouTube doesn't

0:21:05.040 --> 0:21:10.880
<v Speaker 1>really monetize as well as some other outlets. But it's

0:21:10.880 --> 0:21:15.679
<v Speaker 1>a it's a new frontier because digital just changed everything basically. Really,

0:21:15.680 --> 0:21:20.119
<v Speaker 1>that's that's fascinating. So so given the shift to digital

0:21:20.359 --> 0:21:25.240
<v Speaker 1>from analog recordings and the way you as a musician

0:21:25.320 --> 0:21:29.920
<v Speaker 1>have changed, um where you focus your time. What does

0:21:29.920 --> 0:21:32.399
<v Speaker 1>this mean for people who want to go into the

0:21:32.400 --> 0:21:36.040
<v Speaker 1>field of music. Is their emphasis completely different than it

0:21:36.080 --> 0:21:39.280
<v Speaker 1>once was to some extent, yes, I mean I think

0:21:39.280 --> 0:21:43.680
<v Speaker 1>it's it's actually broadened the field. I mean, thirty years ago,

0:21:43.720 --> 0:21:46.120
<v Speaker 1>there were no video game that's a source of revenue

0:21:46.119 --> 0:21:50.080
<v Speaker 1>from I've written for video I've written for Blizzard Entertainment, Activision, Blizzard.

0:21:50.160 --> 0:21:52.880
<v Speaker 1>I did music for Diablo three, which is a big

0:21:52.920 --> 0:21:57.159
<v Speaker 1>game that was a giant game, and that's something that

0:21:57.200 --> 0:22:00.600
<v Speaker 1>didn't exist in a previous generation. As a man named

0:22:00.600 --> 0:22:05.119
<v Speaker 1>Tom Tommy Tallarico, who is the most successful of all

0:22:05.160 --> 0:22:07.840
<v Speaker 1>the video game composers, going back to like Super Mario

0:22:07.920 --> 0:22:11.800
<v Speaker 1>Brothers kind of like you know, those very like Nintendo games.

0:22:11.840 --> 0:22:14.760
<v Speaker 1>That's a new end of the business. Let's talk a

0:22:14.840 --> 0:22:18.880
<v Speaker 1>little bit about some of the guitarists you mentioned. You

0:22:18.920 --> 0:22:24.000
<v Speaker 1>mentioned a few names earlier. Remind me of who you

0:22:24.119 --> 0:22:27.240
<v Speaker 1>referred to out in l A. Well, I mean the

0:22:27.359 --> 0:22:29.200
<v Speaker 1>number one on the list I think for everybody is

0:22:29.280 --> 0:22:32.280
<v Speaker 1>Jango Reinhart. Oh well, yeah, but the guys in l

0:22:32.320 --> 0:22:34.800
<v Speaker 1>A would be like Larry Carlton and Lee Writtener, you

0:22:34.800 --> 0:22:37.240
<v Speaker 1>know who. And that started off the studio players. There

0:22:37.280 --> 0:22:40.480
<v Speaker 1>was a pass of being a studio player in l A.

0:22:40.720 --> 0:22:44.560
<v Speaker 1>That was followed by like Bonnie Castle, um, and and

0:22:44.680 --> 0:22:48.520
<v Speaker 1>players like that who were studio guys but also were

0:22:48.600 --> 0:22:52.240
<v Speaker 1>jazz players so they could do and roll. They could,

0:22:53.080 --> 0:22:55.800
<v Speaker 1>but they preferred the jazz. I mean Bonnie Castle, for example,

0:22:55.880 --> 0:22:59.080
<v Speaker 1>was actually a mentor to Phil Specter really and played

0:22:59.160 --> 0:23:02.480
<v Speaker 1>on a number of the records. And you know, like, um,

0:23:02.560 --> 0:23:04.800
<v Speaker 1>but when you go back and you listen to some

0:23:04.840 --> 0:23:07.399
<v Speaker 1>of those, especially like the fifties movie score, some of

0:23:07.440 --> 0:23:09.840
<v Speaker 1>the Man Seni stuff, and you're here, like some really

0:23:10.160 --> 0:23:13.600
<v Speaker 1>kind of like jazz guy. Well, I'm not tuned for

0:23:13.640 --> 0:23:16.800
<v Speaker 1>the man seen you right now, but um, but some

0:23:17.000 --> 0:23:19.000
<v Speaker 1>but some of the jazz guy you know, like especially

0:23:19.040 --> 0:23:21.160
<v Speaker 1>at Barney Kessele, who was a big hero of mine.

0:23:21.320 --> 0:23:31.760
<v Speaker 1>And you mentioned the jangle. Yeah, the Belgian Gypsy who

0:23:31.800 --> 0:23:35.600
<v Speaker 1>I think everybody kind of looks to us being probably

0:23:35.640 --> 0:23:38.840
<v Speaker 1>the greatest guitarist of all time. Really certainly the father

0:23:39.000 --> 0:23:43.680
<v Speaker 1>of that style of on the European side, yes, but

0:23:43.680 --> 0:23:48.480
<v Speaker 1>but the father of American jazz guitar was Eddie Lang. Um.

0:23:49.800 --> 0:23:53.840
<v Speaker 1>And then how does he differ from Reinhardt. Well, Eddie

0:23:53.920 --> 0:23:57.920
<v Speaker 1>lang was of Italian descent, and you know he worked

0:23:57.920 --> 0:24:00.199
<v Speaker 1>with Bing Crosby. I mean he was being Crossby's right

0:24:00.200 --> 0:24:04.159
<v Speaker 1>hand man, so different stylistic area. I mean, Django was

0:24:04.240 --> 0:24:09.120
<v Speaker 1>very much in the Gypsy chairs kind of It's kind

0:24:09.119 --> 0:24:11.280
<v Speaker 1>of like there's that rhythm is what they called the

0:24:11.280 --> 0:24:14.480
<v Speaker 1>pump pump, and it kind of just sits in the

0:24:14.520 --> 0:24:18.320
<v Speaker 1>particular kind of groove. Um, Eddie Lange was was a

0:24:18.400 --> 0:24:20.560
<v Speaker 1>very versatile guitar player. I did a lot of records

0:24:20.560 --> 0:24:25.400
<v Speaker 1>with Joe Anuti around thirty but even prior to that,

0:24:25.440 --> 0:24:30.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean the first Bona fide recorded blues guitar solo

0:24:31.040 --> 0:24:36.679
<v Speaker 1>was Lonnie Johnson recorded a piece called hight Glide in

0:24:37.800 --> 0:24:41.240
<v Speaker 1>seven and that has all the you know, all those

0:24:41.320 --> 0:24:54.920
<v Speaker 1>kind of with him and a piano player, but all

0:24:54.920 --> 0:24:59.440
<v Speaker 1>those bent notes and vibrato and improvised blues solos. That's

0:24:59.480 --> 0:25:01.679
<v Speaker 1>that was really the beginning of it, because the guitar

0:25:01.720 --> 0:25:04.600
<v Speaker 1>didn't really kind of have make a big mark in

0:25:04.640 --> 0:25:08.400
<v Speaker 1>the recording industry until the mid mid to late twenties.

0:25:09.000 --> 0:25:12.160
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk about some of your contemporaries, or let's let's

0:25:12.720 --> 0:25:16.080
<v Speaker 1>I'll work my way, um historically, let's talk about Less

0:25:16.119 --> 0:25:18.840
<v Speaker 1>Paul a little bit. Oh yeah, what what is my

0:25:18.960 --> 0:25:22.720
<v Speaker 1>great regret in life? As a grad students, I lived

0:25:22.720 --> 0:25:26.680
<v Speaker 1>on seventeenth and third, around the corner from Fat Tuesdays,

0:25:26.720 --> 0:25:29.800
<v Speaker 1>where he played every week, and I kept saying to myself, Oh,

0:25:29.840 --> 0:25:32.480
<v Speaker 1>I have to go see less Ball. And five years later,

0:25:33.119 --> 0:25:36.159
<v Speaker 1>well then he was led over to Iridium. M I

0:25:36.240 --> 0:25:39.760
<v Speaker 1>missed the window closed before. Yeah. I actually went to

0:25:39.760 --> 0:25:42.000
<v Speaker 1>play with him at Iridium on a Monday, a very

0:25:42.080 --> 0:25:45.479
<v Speaker 1>rainy Monday night after a huge northeaster, and he couldn't

0:25:45.480 --> 0:25:47.359
<v Speaker 1>get there, He couldn't get out of his house because

0:25:47.400 --> 0:25:50.639
<v Speaker 1>the bridge had been washed washed over. But I played

0:25:50.640 --> 0:25:52.760
<v Speaker 1>with his band. I played with the Less Paul band.

0:25:52.840 --> 0:25:54.520
<v Speaker 1>What I never got to actually play with Less. What

0:25:54.560 --> 0:25:58.120
<v Speaker 1>do you think of him as a guitarist? Fabulous, one

0:25:58.160 --> 0:26:01.400
<v Speaker 1>of the great jazz guitar play before it became kind

0:26:01.400 --> 0:26:04.760
<v Speaker 1>of a pop star with with Mary Ford and and

0:26:04.800 --> 0:26:07.840
<v Speaker 1>of course not not just a great jazz player, but

0:26:07.920 --> 0:26:12.560
<v Speaker 1>also really the father of the modern recording technology. I mean,

0:26:13.000 --> 0:26:15.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, the modern studio, modern recording studio. Pretty much

0:26:16.840 --> 0:26:19.919
<v Speaker 1>Les Paul is to the recording studio what Thomas Edison

0:26:20.000 --> 0:26:23.040
<v Speaker 1>was to the lightbulb, and not only to the recording studio,

0:26:23.400 --> 0:26:27.199
<v Speaker 1>but also to the electric guitar. Song electric guitar to

0:26:27.280 --> 0:26:29.919
<v Speaker 1>some degree. But he didn't invent the electric guitar, but

0:26:30.040 --> 0:26:33.040
<v Speaker 1>he did invent a lot of things like multitrack recording.

0:26:33.400 --> 0:26:36.600
<v Speaker 1>So you you recorded a version of Peter Towns It's

0:26:36.760 --> 0:26:40.960
<v Speaker 1>you did a few Who songs, which I believe you

0:26:41.359 --> 0:26:44.919
<v Speaker 1>once said Towns had said was impossible to do on guitar.

0:26:46.000 --> 0:26:49.399
<v Speaker 1>He didn't say that to me. He was amazed that

0:26:49.440 --> 0:26:51.720
<v Speaker 1>I could do it on guitar. I mean, you know,

0:26:51.760 --> 0:26:57.800
<v Speaker 1>I do it in dad gad tuning, which is one

0:26:57.840 --> 0:27:03.000
<v Speaker 1>of the alter tunings that I use the intro, which

0:27:03.080 --> 0:27:09.520
<v Speaker 1>is a synthesizer like a sequence synthesizer thing, which is

0:27:09.520 --> 0:27:11.800
<v Speaker 1>why he thought it could be done on a guitar.

0:27:18.240 --> 0:27:21.600
<v Speaker 1>So you know, it's like that, and it's you. You

0:27:21.680 --> 0:27:24.359
<v Speaker 1>have to be you have to figure it out, and

0:27:24.440 --> 0:27:27.159
<v Speaker 1>you can't do it in standard tuning. And then it

0:27:27.240 --> 0:27:34.200
<v Speaker 1>kind of breaks into I don't do Roger Daughters scream.

0:27:34.240 --> 0:27:36.040
<v Speaker 1>What do you think of towns It as a writer

0:27:36.119 --> 0:27:38.240
<v Speaker 1>and a guitar. Oh, it's fabulous. I mean one of

0:27:38.280 --> 0:27:41.640
<v Speaker 1>the great great rock is what makes him so good

0:27:42.920 --> 0:27:49.160
<v Speaker 1>to pull a line from? That's right, it's just that

0:27:50.240 --> 0:27:53.720
<v Speaker 1>the combination of talent and clearly there's a genetic component

0:27:53.760 --> 0:28:00.760
<v Speaker 1>because his dad was a musician. There's a combination of talent, persistence, experience.

0:28:02.080 --> 0:28:07.159
<v Speaker 1>You know, you can't do what he does without having

0:28:07.200 --> 0:28:12.960
<v Speaker 1>that that intensity of dedication. It's not easy to maintain

0:28:13.480 --> 0:28:17.000
<v Speaker 1>a career, to to start a career in the music business,

0:28:17.000 --> 0:28:20.400
<v Speaker 1>and then to maintain it for thirty or forty years. Yeah,

0:28:20.480 --> 0:28:22.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, but look at and look at McCartney. I mean,

0:28:22.520 --> 0:28:25.439
<v Speaker 1>it's still going out and doing tree. Yeah, it's amazing.

0:28:25.760 --> 0:28:29.760
<v Speaker 1>That's um. What about Mark Knopfler, who I find to

0:28:29.800 --> 0:28:32.359
<v Speaker 1>be fast, great player, really interesting because he you know,

0:28:32.359 --> 0:28:35.240
<v Speaker 1>he plays fingerstyle, yes, and he's a lefty, but he

0:28:35.240 --> 0:28:38.680
<v Speaker 1>plays right handed. There's a few a few guitar players

0:28:38.960 --> 0:28:41.400
<v Speaker 1>who are lefties, who are leftist who play right does

0:28:41.440 --> 0:28:43.440
<v Speaker 1>that well? We know Hendrix used to play in a

0:28:43.440 --> 0:28:46.720
<v Speaker 1>handful of other guys used to play actually lefty. What

0:28:46.840 --> 0:28:49.280
<v Speaker 1>does it do if you're a lefty playing right? He

0:28:49.360 --> 0:28:51.480
<v Speaker 1>does it give you an advantage with your left hand?

0:28:51.600 --> 0:28:53.520
<v Speaker 1>You know it? That's you do? You have to ask

0:28:53.560 --> 0:29:00.720
<v Speaker 1>a neurologist. Um, I mean, it's remarkable to me what

0:29:00.720 --> 0:29:02.640
<v Speaker 1>what I can do with my left hand, and yet

0:29:02.680 --> 0:29:06.000
<v Speaker 1>if I pick up a pen, it's it's like hopeless,

0:29:06.080 --> 0:29:11.120
<v Speaker 1>you know. But but but the fact is that both

0:29:11.160 --> 0:29:14.560
<v Speaker 1>hands have to be especially with fingerstyle, they really have

0:29:14.640 --> 0:29:17.760
<v Speaker 1>to be equally quiet, and the left hand is actually

0:29:17.760 --> 0:29:20.840
<v Speaker 1>doing more, but the left hand corresponds to the right brain.

0:29:21.600 --> 0:29:25.720
<v Speaker 1>So it's kind of there's a creative flow that happens.

0:29:25.880 --> 0:29:29.480
<v Speaker 1>Makes sense, your most cock cockingen, Oh, you're amost great.

0:29:30.120 --> 0:29:33.560
<v Speaker 1>I saw him at a tiny pub in college and

0:29:33.600 --> 0:29:36.880
<v Speaker 1>he was just mesmerized. You know, he's great. Um, I

0:29:37.000 --> 0:29:41.280
<v Speaker 1>taught he has a camp in Pomeroy, Ohio called fur

0:29:41.360 --> 0:29:46.240
<v Speaker 1>Piece Ranch, and I taught there and got to hang

0:29:46.280 --> 0:29:49.240
<v Speaker 1>with him, and you know, and like we're in breakfast

0:29:49.240 --> 0:29:51.600
<v Speaker 1>one morning, yourman pulls out his guitar and starts singing

0:29:51.640 --> 0:29:53.760
<v Speaker 1>songs for us, and it's so cool. Just out a

0:29:53.840 --> 0:29:58.200
<v Speaker 1>left field. Yeah, just really a very talented individual. I

0:29:58.240 --> 0:30:00.600
<v Speaker 1>was never a giant hot tune a fan, but I

0:30:00.640 --> 0:30:04.479
<v Speaker 1>always thought he was a fascinating musician. I liked what

0:30:04.520 --> 0:30:08.719
<v Speaker 1>he did. An interesting point of background is that he

0:30:08.920 --> 0:30:13.400
<v Speaker 1>studied from the DC area originally and studied with Sophocles Papas,

0:30:13.440 --> 0:30:19.600
<v Speaker 1>who was one of Segovia's proteges. Interesting, I have a

0:30:19.680 --> 0:30:21.720
<v Speaker 1>handful of guitarists they have to run. I have to

0:30:21.760 --> 0:30:26.160
<v Speaker 1>ask you about Eric Clapton. Yeah, well, you know, what

0:30:26.200 --> 0:30:30.200
<v Speaker 1>can you say The Blues Breaker's album with Joe male

0:30:30.960 --> 0:30:38.240
<v Speaker 1>Um hide Away, You know, I mean that that was

0:30:39.760 --> 0:30:43.120
<v Speaker 1>an epiphany for me hearing that for the first time.

0:30:43.800 --> 0:30:47.720
<v Speaker 1>And then Frank Zappa talk about Zappa that much brilliant

0:30:47.720 --> 0:30:51.480
<v Speaker 1>guitarists and an even more brilliant composer, one of the greats.

0:30:52.320 --> 0:30:55.520
<v Speaker 1>But you know, just so eccentric, you kind of you

0:30:55.720 --> 0:31:01.840
<v Speaker 1>don't even realized just how how dense and what kind

0:31:01.840 --> 0:31:06.360
<v Speaker 1>of what kind of granular detail is on it? Going

0:31:06.360 --> 0:31:07.840
<v Speaker 1>on his music. I used to see him a lot

0:31:07.840 --> 0:31:09.719
<v Speaker 1>in London when he I saw him at the Albert

0:31:09.720 --> 0:31:12.520
<v Speaker 1>Hall with Don Preston playing the huge organ there. That

0:31:12.600 --> 0:31:15.880
<v Speaker 1>was really cool. What's fascinating is his son Dweezel, who's

0:31:15.920 --> 0:31:19.560
<v Speaker 1>also a good guitarist, pulls out each year these kids

0:31:19.600 --> 0:31:23.280
<v Speaker 1>out of Berkeley College and Music and they're nineteen and

0:31:23.320 --> 0:31:27.000
<v Speaker 1>twenty years old and they tour playing Zappa's music and

0:31:27.040 --> 0:31:31.400
<v Speaker 1>they're amazing. But there's a lesson in estate planning because

0:31:31.440 --> 0:31:34.120
<v Speaker 1>you know that there's a conflict within the Zappa family

0:31:34.680 --> 0:31:39.360
<v Speaker 1>and Dweezel can't promoted a Zappa plays Zappa but you

0:31:39.400 --> 0:31:43.360
<v Speaker 1>know this litigation ongoing, and yeah, yeah, you gotta, you

0:31:43.440 --> 0:31:46.520
<v Speaker 1>gotta get stuff like that straight. To say the least,

0:31:46.920 --> 0:31:49.800
<v Speaker 1>we have been speaking with Lawrence Jubber. I'll be sure

0:31:49.840 --> 0:31:53.080
<v Speaker 1>and check out my daily column on Bloomberg View dot com.

0:31:53.680 --> 0:31:56.120
<v Speaker 1>You can follow me on Twitter at rid Halts. We

0:31:56.200 --> 0:32:00.240
<v Speaker 1>love your comments, feedback and suggestions right to us at

0:32:00.720 --> 0:32:04.320
<v Speaker 1>m IB podcast at Bloomberg dot net. I'm Barry Ridholtz.

0:32:04.320 --> 0:32:23.920
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to Masters in Business on Bloomberg Radio. Welcome

0:32:23.960 --> 0:32:26.760
<v Speaker 1>to the podcast, Lawrence. Thank you so much for doing

0:32:26.760 --> 0:32:31.560
<v Speaker 1>this and bringing your acts and playing a little bit um.

0:32:31.760 --> 0:32:35.760
<v Speaker 1>We were just saying, you develop an intuitive sense of

0:32:35.760 --> 0:32:40.280
<v Speaker 1>of timing. You can you can tell when you've done

0:32:40.280 --> 0:32:42.720
<v Speaker 1>a ninety minutes show, you have a pretty good sense

0:32:42.800 --> 0:32:47.240
<v Speaker 1>of how long the show just ninety minutes, sixty minutes,

0:32:47.320 --> 0:32:51.960
<v Speaker 1>forty five, kind of you just you know how many tunes. Well,

0:32:52.000 --> 0:32:55.280
<v Speaker 1>it's partially a number of tunes, but also just you

0:32:55.360 --> 0:32:58.800
<v Speaker 1>kind of just feel it, you know, I mean, And

0:32:58.880 --> 0:33:01.560
<v Speaker 1>that's for me, that's always been part of the professionalism

0:33:01.560 --> 0:33:03.920
<v Speaker 1>of it is to you know, the contract says you

0:33:03.920 --> 0:33:06.120
<v Speaker 1>play for ninety minutes. I play for ninety minutes and

0:33:06.120 --> 0:33:09.240
<v Speaker 1>then maybe do an encore after that. But but it's

0:33:09.280 --> 0:33:14.360
<v Speaker 1>always important to me to deliver. And my philosophy was

0:33:14.400 --> 0:33:19.040
<v Speaker 1>always make myself indispensable, you know, which means be professional,

0:33:19.120 --> 0:33:22.880
<v Speaker 1>be on time, be in tune with the right instruments.

0:33:23.200 --> 0:33:26.360
<v Speaker 1>And and then that translated once I got onto the

0:33:26.400 --> 0:33:30.040
<v Speaker 1>stage where I was being the artist to be able

0:33:30.120 --> 0:33:33.920
<v Speaker 1>to deliver and be entertaining and engage an audience and

0:33:33.960 --> 0:33:36.480
<v Speaker 1>all of those things. So let's let's talk about engaging

0:33:36.480 --> 0:33:41.800
<v Speaker 1>an audience. I have seen you sometimes deliver lots of

0:33:41.880 --> 0:33:46.080
<v Speaker 1>stage pattern, lots of backstory, not quite full on John

0:33:46.160 --> 0:33:50.600
<v Speaker 1>Pizreeli anecdotes. But I can do anecdotes at times. But

0:33:50.720 --> 0:33:52.560
<v Speaker 1>then there are other times I've seen you were your

0:33:52.600 --> 0:33:55.400
<v Speaker 1>all business and I'm playing music and nothing's getting in

0:33:55.480 --> 0:33:58.400
<v Speaker 1>my way, especially when I'm I'm kind of I mean,

0:33:58.440 --> 0:34:00.360
<v Speaker 1>I've been on the road now for over a week,

0:34:01.280 --> 0:34:05.959
<v Speaker 1>and the more gigs I do, the more my chops

0:34:06.000 --> 0:34:08.960
<v Speaker 1>get kind of you know, like get so you have

0:34:09.000 --> 0:34:11.359
<v Speaker 1>to limber up. You you can have you can come

0:34:11.400 --> 0:34:13.800
<v Speaker 1>off the off the road and be a little rusty

0:34:13.840 --> 0:34:18.560
<v Speaker 1>when you're starting. Um, yeah, a little um. I mean

0:34:18.719 --> 0:34:22.400
<v Speaker 1>it's it. And but it changes from one gig to

0:34:22.440 --> 0:34:25.680
<v Speaker 1>the next. I mean certain shows, depending on the environment,

0:34:25.719 --> 0:34:29.360
<v Speaker 1>I might be more improvisational or lean more towards the

0:34:29.400 --> 0:34:33.960
<v Speaker 1>set pieces. Um, sometimes it'll just feel really loose and

0:34:33.960 --> 0:34:36.600
<v Speaker 1>I'll stretch things out. It's like when I'm playing Little Wing,

0:34:36.640 --> 0:34:41.200
<v Speaker 1>for example, that I and you destroy that song, but

0:34:41.280 --> 0:34:44.080
<v Speaker 1>I leave a space for myself where it's completely improvised.

0:34:44.719 --> 0:34:47.040
<v Speaker 1>You know, I'm playing over the changes. But but but

0:34:47.120 --> 0:34:48.879
<v Speaker 1>I never play it the same way twice. In fact,

0:34:48.880 --> 0:34:51.160
<v Speaker 1>I never try not to play anything exactly at the

0:34:51.160 --> 0:34:52.719
<v Speaker 1>same time. That was the question I was going to

0:34:52.840 --> 0:34:55.600
<v Speaker 1>ask you, because there are certain songs, especially when you're

0:34:55.640 --> 0:35:00.439
<v Speaker 1>doing covers um that they sound pretty similar from song

0:35:00.520 --> 0:35:03.680
<v Speaker 1>to song, and then there are other versions where it's like,

0:35:03.800 --> 0:35:06.800
<v Speaker 1>I didn't never heard that before, Where did that come from?

0:35:07.120 --> 0:35:10.360
<v Speaker 1>Just it's it's the moment, it's being in the musical moment,

0:35:11.440 --> 0:35:13.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, and it's it's kind of I have to

0:35:13.560 --> 0:35:16.000
<v Speaker 1>be very conscious of what I'm doing and where I am,

0:35:16.040 --> 0:35:21.880
<v Speaker 1>but but also allow myself to get to seek transcendence. Okay,

0:35:21.960 --> 0:35:25.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, how does one seek transcendence by not interfering?

0:35:26.280 --> 0:35:30.360
<v Speaker 1>Because where you go what you do is more complex

0:35:30.719 --> 0:35:34.600
<v Speaker 1>than most Because if somebody is just playing a single

0:35:35.760 --> 0:35:39.759
<v Speaker 1>lead and they're there, I don't care how fast or

0:35:39.760 --> 0:35:41.640
<v Speaker 1>slow they're playing, though it's it could be Edi van

0:35:41.680 --> 0:35:46.600
<v Speaker 1>Hallen or whoever. They're thinking about the sequence of those

0:35:46.640 --> 0:35:49.839
<v Speaker 1>notes and what they're playing. You're playing nine things at

0:35:49.840 --> 0:35:54.000
<v Speaker 1>once because it's vertical rather than that's exactly what I'm saying.

0:35:54.080 --> 0:35:57.600
<v Speaker 1>It's one moment to the next. So when when you're playing,

0:35:57.920 --> 0:36:00.839
<v Speaker 1>you're not thinking in terms of no, no, no, you're

0:36:00.880 --> 0:36:05.000
<v Speaker 1>thinking in terms of these six chord, these six strings

0:36:05.000 --> 0:36:07.880
<v Speaker 1>at once and one of my playing and there's a

0:36:07.920 --> 0:36:10.480
<v Speaker 1>lot of things going on when I'm working stuff out, yes,

0:36:10.560 --> 0:36:14.680
<v Speaker 1>but in performance I'm really trying to tell a story.

0:36:14.960 --> 0:36:17.440
<v Speaker 1>The muscle memory just takes off. So the muscle memory

0:36:17.480 --> 0:36:19.680
<v Speaker 1>is in there the and that's really the stuff that

0:36:19.719 --> 0:36:22.960
<v Speaker 1>gets warmed up during the course of the tour is

0:36:23.000 --> 0:36:27.680
<v Speaker 1>that I just become more finely tuned in the narrative

0:36:27.760 --> 0:36:30.960
<v Speaker 1>aspect of it, which then allows me to be the

0:36:31.080 --> 0:36:35.359
<v Speaker 1>freedom to to do um. You know, in music, there's

0:36:35.480 --> 0:36:38.640
<v Speaker 1>a term called rubato, which which means that, you know,

0:36:38.719 --> 0:36:40.400
<v Speaker 1>you can kind of play around with the tempo a

0:36:40.440 --> 0:36:46.160
<v Speaker 1>little bit, but the Italian means to rob and like

0:36:46.760 --> 0:36:49.799
<v Speaker 1>strict rubato, you don't actually slow anything down. It's just

0:36:49.840 --> 0:36:52.160
<v Speaker 1>if you slow down in part of the bar, you

0:36:52.160 --> 0:36:55.120
<v Speaker 1>you speed up, and the rest of the always stay

0:36:55.560 --> 0:36:59.120
<v Speaker 1>you always stay in the pocket. And that stuff that

0:36:59.200 --> 0:37:04.239
<v Speaker 1>I find myself elf being more casual about as a

0:37:04.280 --> 0:37:07.920
<v Speaker 1>tour progressive, which makes it interesting because then it changes

0:37:08.360 --> 0:37:11.680
<v Speaker 1>the texture a little bit. Who is recognizing that when

0:37:11.719 --> 0:37:15.799
<v Speaker 1>you're doing it? I am now a few I mean

0:37:15.800 --> 0:37:18.319
<v Speaker 1>the musicians were. There was a concert pianist in the

0:37:18.360 --> 0:37:22.360
<v Speaker 1>audience last night show. Who who recognize such that that

0:37:22.440 --> 0:37:25.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of you have a conversation afterwards, I noticed you,

0:37:26.160 --> 0:37:30.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah we did, And that's just But but you know,

0:37:30.160 --> 0:37:33.000
<v Speaker 1>the the average Aorgiance member just is there to be entertained.

0:37:33.040 --> 0:37:36.000
<v Speaker 1>They're not necessarily going to pass things like that. They're

0:37:36.040 --> 0:37:40.239
<v Speaker 1>going to just enjoy the concert. So what sort of

0:37:40.280 --> 0:37:44.000
<v Speaker 1>stuff do you enjoy playing? What is entertaining for you

0:37:44.160 --> 0:37:48.719
<v Speaker 1>when you're out on tour? Oh? I particularly like it

0:37:48.760 --> 0:37:51.000
<v Speaker 1>when I can actually create that space to be able

0:37:51.000 --> 0:37:54.080
<v Speaker 1>to be improvisational. So it doesn't matter what the song is.

0:37:54.160 --> 0:37:57.480
<v Speaker 1>The song is just the backdrop for you. That's the

0:37:57.520 --> 0:38:00.920
<v Speaker 1>canvas for you to paint the bon Yeah, and sometimes

0:38:01.000 --> 0:38:03.640
<v Speaker 1>it's it's you know, paint by not paint by numbers

0:38:03.680 --> 0:38:06.399
<v Speaker 1>in the sense of just being by rote. But but

0:38:06.480 --> 0:38:10.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, I there are areas to fill in the color,

0:38:10.480 --> 0:38:13.640
<v Speaker 1>but other places where it will just kind of take

0:38:13.680 --> 0:38:17.880
<v Speaker 1>off into its own, its own kind of thing. Do

0:38:18.320 --> 0:38:21.719
<v Speaker 1>you when you're being transcendent it works itself out? Do

0:38:21.760 --> 0:38:24.440
<v Speaker 1>you ever paint yourself into a corner totally and think

0:38:24.480 --> 0:38:25.719
<v Speaker 1>how am I going to get out of that? But

0:38:25.800 --> 0:38:27.839
<v Speaker 1>that's that's the fum pie is getting out of it.

0:38:28.080 --> 0:38:31.000
<v Speaker 1>In live in real time. There's no no when you're

0:38:31.000 --> 0:38:33.000
<v Speaker 1>in front of an audience, is no, hey, let's re

0:38:33.160 --> 0:38:35.960
<v Speaker 1>record this. I messed up in Medina. Rewind that I

0:38:36.000 --> 0:38:40.040
<v Speaker 1>screwed up. It's I have to figure out all my

0:38:40.080 --> 0:38:42.000
<v Speaker 1>fingers will figure out a way. But you know, but

0:38:42.000 --> 0:38:45.000
<v Speaker 1>but I have the the musical knowledge. I have the

0:38:45.120 --> 0:38:49.640
<v Speaker 1>understanding that I know where I'm going, and it's not

0:38:49.719 --> 0:38:51.839
<v Speaker 1>where you've been. You know, if you stop and think

0:38:51.880 --> 0:38:54.839
<v Speaker 1>about what you just did, you don't get to the destination.

0:38:55.040 --> 0:38:59.200
<v Speaker 1>And it's all about destination from one move to the next.

0:38:59.280 --> 0:39:02.520
<v Speaker 1>It's where does it go next? What's the resolution of

0:39:02.520 --> 0:39:08.200
<v Speaker 1>this harmony? What's the evolution of this fingering? And you know,

0:39:08.280 --> 0:39:12.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean there could be a certain amount of stress

0:39:12.680 --> 0:39:17.040
<v Speaker 1>involved if it's like, oh, okay, you know. But sometimes

0:39:17.080 --> 0:39:19.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you know, I'll like, you know, the stage

0:39:19.480 --> 0:39:21.480
<v Speaker 1>lights will kind of blind me for a second and

0:39:21.560 --> 0:39:23.880
<v Speaker 1>I'll land on the wrong frat. But you know, you

0:39:23.960 --> 0:39:26.640
<v Speaker 1>slide up one or you slide back one, and nobody

0:39:26.680 --> 0:39:29.279
<v Speaker 1>really picks it up, no, because it ends up just

0:39:29.320 --> 0:39:31.200
<v Speaker 1>becoming part of the texture. And then it was like, oh,

0:39:31.239 --> 0:39:34.239
<v Speaker 1>I'll do that again because it sounded cool. You have

0:39:34.320 --> 0:39:37.560
<v Speaker 1>a lot of guitarists and a lot of musicians as fans.

0:39:38.120 --> 0:39:40.840
<v Speaker 1>Does that affect the way you play? Are you thinking

0:39:40.880 --> 0:39:44.400
<v Speaker 1>about that? Hey, if I do this, this subgroup of

0:39:44.440 --> 0:39:47.319
<v Speaker 1>fans are going to appreciate it, or you're you're more

0:39:47.320 --> 0:39:50.640
<v Speaker 1>in the moment and more in the moment people, Although

0:39:50.680 --> 0:39:53.759
<v Speaker 1>it might change if it's a jazz audience. You know,

0:39:53.800 --> 0:39:56.560
<v Speaker 1>if I'm playing with my trio, for example, then I'll

0:39:56.600 --> 0:40:00.439
<v Speaker 1>be less of the solo self sufficiency thing a much

0:40:00.480 --> 0:40:02.719
<v Speaker 1>more into having a bass player there that's going to

0:40:02.840 --> 0:40:07.239
<v Speaker 1>lay down something that I can then really fly over

0:40:07.280 --> 0:40:09.920
<v Speaker 1>the top. And then you know, there's a little bit

0:40:09.960 --> 0:40:13.040
<v Speaker 1>of kind of strutting one stuff for the jazz jury

0:40:13.080 --> 0:40:16.520
<v Speaker 1>as we refer to it. How often are you out

0:40:16.560 --> 0:40:20.239
<v Speaker 1>with the trio versus not that often? I mean if

0:40:20.239 --> 0:40:22.879
<v Speaker 1>a festival thing comes up. Or last December we did

0:40:22.880 --> 0:40:25.600
<v Speaker 1>a Christmas tour for my Christmas album because we recorded

0:40:25.640 --> 0:40:29.880
<v Speaker 1>it that way the previous Christmas bas bas and upright

0:40:29.920 --> 0:40:32.680
<v Speaker 1>bass and drums like you know, just light drums. But

0:40:32.719 --> 0:40:34.520
<v Speaker 1>then you know, second set, I had strapped on an

0:40:34.520 --> 0:40:39.040
<v Speaker 1>electric guitar and we turned into a a um you'll

0:40:39.080 --> 0:40:42.239
<v Speaker 1>tide jam band. Shall we say? Who are some of

0:40:42.280 --> 0:40:47.560
<v Speaker 1>the other musicians that you have been foundational to your development. Well,

0:40:47.640 --> 0:40:50.280
<v Speaker 1>one one musician that was very helpful to me was

0:40:50.280 --> 0:40:53.680
<v Speaker 1>was I Isaacs, who was an English studio guitar player

0:40:54.280 --> 0:40:59.600
<v Speaker 1>for a period, played with with Stephan Grappelli, who's Jenga

0:40:59.680 --> 0:41:03.160
<v Speaker 1>Ryan's violinist, and I was just I think he was

0:41:03.200 --> 0:41:06.480
<v Speaker 1>the one who kind of said, look, you've've got all

0:41:06.480 --> 0:41:10.920
<v Speaker 1>the technique, you just need to learn how to use it. Um.

0:41:11.320 --> 0:41:13.279
<v Speaker 1>And then there was a man named Tony Romano who

0:41:13.360 --> 0:41:18.719
<v Speaker 1>was we talked about Eddie lang and Tony was was

0:41:19.040 --> 0:41:21.279
<v Speaker 1>a singer and a guitar player that traveled with Bob

0:41:21.320 --> 0:41:25.400
<v Speaker 1>Hope and Francis Langford in the USO UM and you

0:41:25.440 --> 0:41:27.080
<v Speaker 1>typically it would just be the three of us and

0:41:27.280 --> 0:41:29.719
<v Speaker 1>three of them and then with Jerry Cologna, the comedian,

0:41:29.800 --> 0:41:31.759
<v Speaker 1>and maybe some dances that would go and do all

0:41:31.800 --> 0:41:34.080
<v Speaker 1>the U s O tours during World War Two. And

0:41:34.200 --> 0:41:39.120
<v Speaker 1>Tony was I mean, the best lesson I ever got

0:41:39.400 --> 0:41:43.480
<v Speaker 1>was with him saying, play big notes. What does that mean? What? What?

0:41:43.600 --> 0:41:47.120
<v Speaker 1>Play big notes and notes that mean something? You know,

0:41:47.160 --> 0:41:48.960
<v Speaker 1>because you can play a whole flurry of notes, but

0:41:49.000 --> 0:41:53.560
<v Speaker 1>they don't necessarily have any kind of substance to them,

0:41:53.640 --> 0:41:56.080
<v Speaker 1>no importance to them. But you know, you want to

0:41:56.200 --> 0:42:02.560
<v Speaker 1>play one note and you put some expression into it

0:42:05.200 --> 0:42:08.960
<v Speaker 1>and it it then has all this dimension to it.

0:42:09.080 --> 0:42:12.480
<v Speaker 1>So I dimensional note, not just a one dimensional note,

0:42:12.480 --> 0:42:16.080
<v Speaker 1>but something you know. I'm going to get very um

0:42:16.280 --> 0:42:19.759
<v Speaker 1>local and retro on you. As a kid, there was

0:42:19.800 --> 0:42:22.719
<v Speaker 1>a local band called the Good Rats. I don't know

0:42:22.760 --> 0:42:24.799
<v Speaker 1>if you know them, I have heard of them, and

0:42:24.840 --> 0:42:28.279
<v Speaker 1>they had a song called Tasty. And you what you've

0:42:28.320 --> 0:42:31.000
<v Speaker 1>just mentioned with big notes is a line from one

0:42:31.040 --> 0:42:34.160
<v Speaker 1>of their songs. Speed ain't nothing without class. You have

0:42:34.239 --> 0:42:37.719
<v Speaker 1>to play tasty. And it's very much along that those

0:42:37.760 --> 0:42:40.919
<v Speaker 1>lines of the notes have to matter. It doesn't matter,

0:42:41.200 --> 0:42:43.239
<v Speaker 1>you know. I mean you can play fast and then

0:42:43.280 --> 0:42:45.640
<v Speaker 1>you know there's value. And you've seen me in concert.

0:42:45.640 --> 0:42:48.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean there's value in playing you know, those those

0:42:48.760 --> 0:42:51.680
<v Speaker 1>that kind of flourishes, you know, those that that kind

0:42:51.719 --> 0:42:54.279
<v Speaker 1>of thing. But but it needs it needs to be

0:42:54.320 --> 0:42:59.400
<v Speaker 1>balanced with expression. So me anyway, One of the questions

0:42:59.440 --> 0:43:01.920
<v Speaker 1>I get from listeners all the time is ask your

0:43:01.960 --> 0:43:05.160
<v Speaker 1>guests about books. What sort of stuff do you read?

0:43:05.239 --> 0:43:08.200
<v Speaker 1>You're you're traveling a lot, a lot of airplane stuff.

0:43:08.239 --> 0:43:10.359
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I just load up my kindle with you know,

0:43:10.560 --> 0:43:17.120
<v Speaker 1>kind of adventure are some extent. Recently, I've been reading

0:43:17.560 --> 0:43:21.160
<v Speaker 1>reading some musicology. David Burns had an interesting book out

0:43:21.200 --> 0:43:27.560
<v Speaker 1>not too long ago, Um of the talking heads to

0:43:27.600 --> 0:43:31.120
<v Speaker 1>be called musicology or something like. I'm into guitar ology,

0:43:32.760 --> 0:43:34.880
<v Speaker 1>where guitar meets musicology. I've been doing a lot of

0:43:34.880 --> 0:43:38.600
<v Speaker 1>study of nineteenth century guitar music, and partially because of

0:43:38.600 --> 0:43:42.719
<v Speaker 1>my association with Martin guitars. Um and I have a

0:43:42.760 --> 0:43:45.920
<v Speaker 1>talk that I give guitar Mania to Beatlemania, which is

0:43:45.960 --> 0:43:48.920
<v Speaker 1>a slide show history of the guitar. And I can

0:43:48.960 --> 0:43:54.560
<v Speaker 1>play some examples of period pieces. And I have an

0:43:54.560 --> 0:43:58.160
<v Speaker 1>eighteen ninety three Martin Parlor guitar that works really nicely

0:43:58.239 --> 0:44:01.520
<v Speaker 1>for stuff. So player an example of I have to

0:44:01.560 --> 0:44:06.480
<v Speaker 1>retune hand. I was in dad gat tuning for the

0:44:06.520 --> 0:44:12.840
<v Speaker 1>whole time. No, just earlier on. Let me go a

0:44:12.920 --> 0:44:21.160
<v Speaker 1>quick example here, Um, I just finished. So you're not

0:44:21.239 --> 0:44:23.600
<v Speaker 1>even looking at I have a tune in here. Yeah,

0:44:23.600 --> 0:44:25.839
<v Speaker 1>but you are you paying attention to it doing doing

0:44:25.840 --> 0:44:30.160
<v Speaker 1>it by year. But I'm listening to because I'm watching

0:44:30.200 --> 0:44:32.560
<v Speaker 1>you not look at that as your tune. But it's

0:44:32.600 --> 0:44:53.919
<v Speaker 1>tucked back here. M h okay, locked in. So there

0:44:54.000 --> 0:44:57.880
<v Speaker 1>was an Italian named len Yanni who was a contemporary

0:44:57.920 --> 0:45:00.120
<v Speaker 1>of Paganini. In fact, there's thought that the two have

0:45:00.160 --> 0:45:03.480
<v Speaker 1>them played together, and he was known as the Paganini

0:45:03.520 --> 0:45:06.680
<v Speaker 1>of the guitar. It would be like eighteen twenties and

0:45:07.680 --> 0:45:11.040
<v Speaker 1>by any modern standards, he was a shredder and he's

0:45:11.040 --> 0:45:37.880
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of Lenani's. Then um Um there was

0:45:38.320 --> 0:45:40.400
<v Speaker 1>an American guitar player. So what happened was that there

0:45:40.480 --> 0:45:43.480
<v Speaker 1>was this kind of what we call classical guitar now

0:45:43.600 --> 0:45:47.719
<v Speaker 1>it's really Spanish classical guitars filtered through Segovia. But there

0:45:47.760 --> 0:45:54.120
<v Speaker 1>were a lot of um Central Northern European guitar players

0:45:54.520 --> 0:45:59.680
<v Speaker 1>in the early nineteenth century who were extremely influential professional

0:45:59.680 --> 0:46:02.480
<v Speaker 1>guitar players. I mean, the only major difference between what

0:46:02.520 --> 0:46:04.359
<v Speaker 1>they did and what we do now is they had

0:46:04.360 --> 0:46:10.040
<v Speaker 1>no recording industry there and the they were very influential

0:46:10.160 --> 0:46:14.560
<v Speaker 1>on the growth of the American classical guitar And in

0:46:14.600 --> 0:46:17.040
<v Speaker 1>the second half of the nineteenth century there was a

0:46:17.080 --> 0:46:20.920
<v Speaker 1>whole school of guitar music in America, which mostly we

0:46:21.000 --> 0:46:24.160
<v Speaker 1>called parlor guitar music, and that ties in with the

0:46:24.239 --> 0:46:27.120
<v Speaker 1>history of Martin guitars, which I know my signature model

0:46:27.120 --> 0:46:31.360
<v Speaker 1>as a Martin Um. Here's an example. Up Martin's agent

0:46:31.480 --> 0:46:35.000
<v Speaker 1>in New York in the middle of the century was

0:46:35.239 --> 0:46:39.160
<v Speaker 1>a manager, Charles de jannon Um and he this is

0:46:39.360 --> 0:46:41.680
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of a Massurka that he published and

0:46:41.800 --> 0:46:47.080
<v Speaker 1>very typically marches Masurka's Waltz is Um published in eighty

0:47:05.239 --> 0:47:08.279
<v Speaker 1>You know that kind of thing played in the parlor. Yeah,

0:47:08.280 --> 0:47:11.319
<v Speaker 1>but a Mazurka, the you know, this kind of little

0:47:11.320 --> 0:47:14.880
<v Speaker 1>bouncy thing is characteristic of the masurk um. So how

0:47:14.920 --> 0:47:17.239
<v Speaker 1>does that go from from what you played earlier to

0:47:17.360 --> 0:47:23.680
<v Speaker 1>this to how does that eventually translate to modern American

0:47:23.719 --> 0:47:27.280
<v Speaker 1>classical and then blues in the Beatles. Well, what happened

0:47:27.640 --> 0:47:31.600
<v Speaker 1>really was the in the classical area, and there were

0:47:31.600 --> 0:47:33.720
<v Speaker 1>by the turn of the century there were two major

0:47:34.080 --> 0:47:36.920
<v Speaker 1>guitar players. It was William Foden, known as the Wizard

0:47:36.920 --> 0:47:39.120
<v Speaker 1>of the Guitar, and then there was a woman named

0:47:39.200 --> 0:47:41.960
<v Speaker 1>verd orch At Bickford who and they were kind of

0:47:42.000 --> 0:47:44.759
<v Speaker 1>polar opposites. He was very technical, he was famous for

0:47:44.840 --> 0:47:49.480
<v Speaker 1>his incredible tremolo technique, and she was very artistic and

0:47:49.640 --> 0:47:52.920
<v Speaker 1>very very much in almost like a precursor of the

0:47:53.000 --> 0:47:55.759
<v Speaker 1>New Age kind of thing. She was actually an astrologer,

0:47:56.160 --> 0:47:58.879
<v Speaker 1>as was her husband too. And then there was something

0:47:58.920 --> 0:48:02.440
<v Speaker 1>called the BMG move which was the banjo mandelin guitar movement,

0:48:02.520 --> 0:48:06.799
<v Speaker 1>which was kind of a marketing things that to help

0:48:06.840 --> 0:48:09.319
<v Speaker 1>sell all these when was that around around the turn

0:48:09.320 --> 0:48:12.040
<v Speaker 1>of the century, and you have you have Gibson had

0:48:12.080 --> 0:48:15.719
<v Speaker 1>mandolin orchestras, and there was a lot of that going on.

0:48:15.760 --> 0:48:18.040
<v Speaker 1>But when Segovia came along in the nineteen twenties, he

0:48:18.120 --> 0:48:21.920
<v Speaker 1>kind of swept away the American side of it and

0:48:21.960 --> 0:48:24.239
<v Speaker 1>replaced it with the kind of the gravitas of the

0:48:24.280 --> 0:48:27.920
<v Speaker 1>Spanish classical guitar. Well, give us, give us an example,

0:48:28.680 --> 0:48:32.799
<v Speaker 1>I mean sego Via. You know it's it's classical in

0:48:32.840 --> 0:48:46.520
<v Speaker 1>that I mean, like Bark it works so well. Was

0:48:46.520 --> 0:48:49.319
<v Speaker 1>that it works so well on guitar? Well, yeah, I

0:48:49.320 --> 0:48:52.800
<v Speaker 1>mean bach Bach wrote that for Loot, so it works

0:48:52.800 --> 0:48:55.480
<v Speaker 1>on guitar. But but here's something to think about, especially

0:48:55.560 --> 0:49:05.760
<v Speaker 1>the second section. I swear Paul got black from chet Atkins.

0:49:05.840 --> 0:49:09.760
<v Speaker 1>Chet Atkins recorded that that particular piece, and Georgia George

0:49:09.760 --> 0:49:15.279
<v Speaker 1>Harrison owned the record chet Atkins in Hi Fi ninety seven. Um,

0:49:15.400 --> 0:49:18.600
<v Speaker 1>So George Harrison's and Paul McCartney. Yes, let's get a

0:49:18.600 --> 0:49:23.840
<v Speaker 1>couple of songs down. Let's see that. I have to

0:49:23.920 --> 0:49:27.160
<v Speaker 1>record this. I don't know if you have another version

0:49:27.200 --> 0:49:29.760
<v Speaker 1>of Little Wing in you, because that was amazing yesterday.

0:49:29.800 --> 0:49:33.160
<v Speaker 1>I'll give you to tunes. I'll do a little Wing,

0:49:33.239 --> 0:49:38.080
<v Speaker 1>but first singing that we were talking Beatles, I'll give

0:49:38.080 --> 0:49:41.799
<v Speaker 1>you a track from my latest CD and I've done. Now.

0:49:41.960 --> 0:49:44.960
<v Speaker 1>This is my third album of Beatle arrangements, really the

0:49:45.000 --> 0:49:48.000
<v Speaker 1>fourth if you include the Wings album. Yeah, but that

0:49:48.080 --> 0:49:52.759
<v Speaker 1>doesn't quite fit in with the Beatles. Thing different. And

0:49:52.800 --> 0:49:55.400
<v Speaker 1>I have to say I love all the Beatles stuff

0:49:55.440 --> 0:50:00.520
<v Speaker 1>you do, but I found this album surprising in some

0:50:00.680 --> 0:50:05.480
<v Speaker 1>of the selection of songs and the arrangements of some

0:50:05.640 --> 0:50:08.920
<v Speaker 1>of them kind of kind of took me a little like,

0:50:09.400 --> 0:50:12.480
<v Speaker 1>that's really interesting. And to some extent this was kind

0:50:12.480 --> 0:50:15.480
<v Speaker 1>of a looser album than some of the others. Um

0:50:15.520 --> 0:52:39.640
<v Speaker 1>but his um, she loves You. That's just fantastic. I

0:52:39.680 --> 0:52:41.640
<v Speaker 1>have to I have to stop this for a second.

0:52:42.040 --> 0:52:47.560
<v Speaker 1>So I had a conversation about you with Derrick Thompson,

0:52:47.640 --> 0:52:51.320
<v Speaker 1>who's an author at the Atlantic who wrote a book

0:52:51.480 --> 0:52:55.080
<v Speaker 1>called How Hits Are Made, and he looked at a

0:52:55.120 --> 0:53:00.240
<v Speaker 1>lot of historical UM trends and hits and how tofferent

0:53:00.280 --> 0:53:03.279
<v Speaker 1>things came about. It was really quite fascinating. And one

0:53:03.280 --> 0:53:06.160
<v Speaker 1>of the things that he talked about was this industrial

0:53:06.239 --> 0:53:08.960
<v Speaker 1>designer in the first half of the twentieth century whose

0:53:09.000 --> 0:53:14.360
<v Speaker 1>name escapes me, but his philosophical insight was called Maya

0:53:14.840 --> 0:53:19.279
<v Speaker 1>most advanced yet acceptable. And what this person did. He's

0:53:19.320 --> 0:53:23.560
<v Speaker 1>the guy who literally designed the standard pencil sharpnry we

0:53:23.560 --> 0:53:26.920
<v Speaker 1>all grew up with, and things like that. You couldn't

0:53:26.920 --> 0:53:29.760
<v Speaker 1>take something too far out into the future because people

0:53:30.719 --> 0:53:34.400
<v Speaker 1>would reject it. It had to be familiar. If you

0:53:34.440 --> 0:53:37.320
<v Speaker 1>wanted to sell something different, he said, make it familiar.

0:53:37.760 --> 0:53:39.600
<v Speaker 1>And if you want to sell something familiar, you had

0:53:39.640 --> 0:53:43.440
<v Speaker 1>to make it a little different. And so so Derek

0:53:43.640 --> 0:53:48.120
<v Speaker 1>describes how this works not only with industrial design, but

0:53:48.360 --> 0:53:51.920
<v Speaker 1>movies and music and and so I bring you up

0:53:51.960 --> 0:53:54.920
<v Speaker 1>as an example of you know, when you hear most

0:53:54.960 --> 0:53:58.560
<v Speaker 1>beatle covers, it's either a note for note reproduction, in

0:53:58.600 --> 0:54:03.120
<v Speaker 1>which case it's worthless, or it's so different that you

0:54:03.160 --> 0:54:08.960
<v Speaker 1>don't even recognize it, with Joe Cocker being the exception, right.

0:54:09.280 --> 0:54:14.280
<v Speaker 1>But he but that stood alone his version of of um,

0:54:14.360 --> 0:54:17.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm trying to remember which cover he did that actually

0:54:17.160 --> 0:54:21.160
<v Speaker 1>worked on on on its own. But when I referenced

0:54:21.320 --> 0:54:26.880
<v Speaker 1>your work, I said, the songs are immediately recognizable melodically

0:54:26.920 --> 0:54:31.600
<v Speaker 1>as each individual Beatles song, and yet they're so different

0:54:32.280 --> 0:54:35.480
<v Speaker 1>that they stand alone. And so it's that that picture,

0:54:35.520 --> 0:54:39.520
<v Speaker 1>the two ven diagrams that overlap of Oh, this is

0:54:39.560 --> 0:54:43.240
<v Speaker 1>something I totally recognize, but it's such a completely fresh

0:54:43.280 --> 0:54:46.359
<v Speaker 1>and different version of it that it makes it really

0:54:46.440 --> 0:54:50.399
<v Speaker 1>quite interesting. And he literally a whole book how hits

0:54:50.400 --> 0:54:58.400
<v Speaker 1>are made. The Beatles music encapsulates that because it's especially

0:54:58.480 --> 0:55:01.600
<v Speaker 1>something like She Loves You, where there are elements of

0:55:02.360 --> 0:55:10.760
<v Speaker 1>tim Panale of Broadway, there are elements of blues, and

0:55:11.360 --> 0:55:17.360
<v Speaker 1>there are elements of even folk, but put together in

0:55:17.400 --> 0:55:22.440
<v Speaker 1>a way that is uniquely them, no doubt about that.

0:55:22.800 --> 0:55:28.600
<v Speaker 1>So it's that absolutely, that's the thing is it's it's familiar. Well,

0:55:28.640 --> 0:55:31.720
<v Speaker 1>that's their work was familiar yet, but I'm talking about

0:55:32.800 --> 0:55:36.279
<v Speaker 1>my version. But but my ability to take that and

0:55:36.320 --> 0:55:40.960
<v Speaker 1>then translate it to the guitar, which and I'm using

0:55:41.040 --> 0:55:47.759
<v Speaker 1>my musicality, my musicianship to do that, then really you know,

0:55:48.000 --> 0:55:50.759
<v Speaker 1>I've got a foundation to build on. And then the

0:55:50.800 --> 0:55:54.320
<v Speaker 1>way that I approached the guitar in terms of working

0:55:54.360 --> 0:55:58.000
<v Speaker 1>to make the melody sing, to make the base interesting,

0:55:58.120 --> 0:56:00.640
<v Speaker 1>and you know, whether it's reproducing what's on the Beetle

0:56:00.719 --> 0:56:06.160
<v Speaker 1>record or some interpretation of that is, it's just it works.

0:56:06.520 --> 0:56:08.920
<v Speaker 1>It seems to work. You know, someone could sit down

0:56:09.560 --> 0:56:12.400
<v Speaker 1>at a piano and play the song and there's who cares.

0:56:12.440 --> 0:56:18.560
<v Speaker 1>There's nothing special there but your versions they're that familiar

0:56:18.719 --> 0:56:21.600
<v Speaker 1>but different enough that apparently apparently I have a voice

0:56:21.920 --> 0:56:24.319
<v Speaker 1>on your guitar, so I think that's part of it,

0:56:24.400 --> 0:56:28.600
<v Speaker 1>to say the least. So you're asking about little wings,

0:56:28.640 --> 0:56:30.480
<v Speaker 1>all right, before you start, I have to get this

0:56:30.520 --> 0:56:34.080
<v Speaker 1>teat up. I'm gonna make you start that over again. Chris. You,

0:56:34.320 --> 0:56:36.839
<v Speaker 1>by the way, you destroyed the room last night, but

0:56:36.960 --> 0:56:39.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if you're aware of it. People were.

0:56:41.280 --> 0:56:43.759
<v Speaker 1>So let's let's do a little a little little wing,

0:56:43.880 --> 0:56:47.279
<v Speaker 1>A little little little little wing. Let me put my

0:56:47.320 --> 0:56:52.960
<v Speaker 1>strap on now, agetting serious? Oh yeah, really serious. Pay

0:56:53.000 --> 0:56:55.640
<v Speaker 1>attention to this because his arms on the chair. So

0:56:55.719 --> 1:01:38.880
<v Speaker 1>it's all proof O amazing, Thank you, Lawrence. That that

1:01:39.120 --> 1:01:43.600
<v Speaker 1>is just beyond words. We have been speaking with guitartist

1:01:43.680 --> 1:01:48.640
<v Speaker 1>extraordinarire Lawrence Juber. If you enjoy this conversation. Well before

1:01:48.800 --> 1:01:51.480
<v Speaker 1>I get to that, if you enjoy the music you heard,

1:01:52.040 --> 1:01:56.000
<v Speaker 1>go to Lawrence Duber dot com. There are twenty four

1:01:56.160 --> 1:02:00.280
<v Speaker 1>or five discs available. Is that about right? So I

1:02:00.760 --> 1:02:03.919
<v Speaker 1>count if you're a Beatles fan, you have to get

1:02:04.000 --> 1:02:08.200
<v Speaker 1>all three Beatles albums plus the Wings album, which I

1:02:08.240 --> 1:02:11.080
<v Speaker 1>think the Wings Album reveals songs that I didn't like

1:02:11.200 --> 1:02:13.440
<v Speaker 1>in the seventies and eighties, and I have found a

1:02:13.480 --> 1:02:17.400
<v Speaker 1>newfound uh, I've come upon a newfound respect for them

1:02:17.440 --> 1:02:21.080
<v Speaker 1>having having you reveal different aspects of it. But if

1:02:21.120 --> 1:02:25.360
<v Speaker 1>you are at all a guitar aficionado, a classical music fan,

1:02:26.080 --> 1:02:32.080
<v Speaker 1>Lawrence's original compositions are really a beauty to behold. You

1:02:32.080 --> 1:02:36.200
<v Speaker 1>you played um Guitar Noir last night, which is a

1:02:36.240 --> 1:02:41.560
<v Speaker 1>lovely song. You played Um. I'm trying to remember pH

1:02:41.760 --> 1:02:47.840
<v Speaker 1>not Telegraph Finger, fingerboard Road. His original work is just

1:02:48.000 --> 1:02:53.040
<v Speaker 1>an exposition of uh guitar. I don't even want to

1:02:53.040 --> 1:02:58.640
<v Speaker 1>say prodigy, just just outstanding. There's a reason musicians are

1:02:58.680 --> 1:03:02.200
<v Speaker 1>big fans of his because because of because of his work,

1:03:02.480 --> 1:03:06.080
<v Speaker 1>and and I find his his You know, when my

1:03:06.080 --> 1:03:07.560
<v Speaker 1>my wife and I are in the car and we

1:03:07.600 --> 1:03:10.040
<v Speaker 1>can't agree on what we want to hear we pop

1:03:10.040 --> 1:03:12.880
<v Speaker 1>in one of your discs and everybody's happy. Um So,

1:03:13.000 --> 1:03:15.480
<v Speaker 1>if you enjoyed the music, go to Laune Stupid dot

1:03:15.520 --> 1:03:18.240
<v Speaker 1>com and you could see both his tour dates and

1:03:18.440 --> 1:03:21.200
<v Speaker 1>all the CDs he has for sale. If you enjoy

1:03:21.320 --> 1:03:23.320
<v Speaker 1>this conversation, be sure and look up an inch or

1:03:23.360 --> 1:03:26.920
<v Speaker 1>down an inch on Apple iTunes and you can see

1:03:27.480 --> 1:03:30.600
<v Speaker 1>or Bloomberg dot com or SoundCloud or overcast and you

1:03:30.600 --> 1:03:33.200
<v Speaker 1>could see the other hundred and forty nine or so

1:03:33.240 --> 1:03:37.400
<v Speaker 1>such conversations we've had. We love your comments, feedback and

1:03:37.480 --> 1:03:40.640
<v Speaker 1>suggestions right to us at m IB podcast at Bloomberg

1:03:40.680 --> 1:03:43.520
<v Speaker 1>dot net. I would be remiss if I did not

1:03:43.600 --> 1:03:48.800
<v Speaker 1>thank Taylor Riggs, my producer, and Medina Parwana, my recording

1:03:48.880 --> 1:03:55.280
<v Speaker 1>engineer slash audiologist, who takes my messy recordings and puts

1:03:55.320 --> 1:03:59.960
<v Speaker 1>them all uh in in using her technical production expert

1:04:00.000 --> 1:04:03.400
<v Speaker 1>piece makes it listenable to you. I'm Barry Ridults. You've

1:04:03.440 --> 1:04:06.120
<v Speaker 1>been listening to Masters in Business on Bloomberg Radio.