Speaker 1: You are entering the freedom huge Democrats cry a lot
Speaker 1: over trumping. Mean, why is the media talking about the
Speaker 1: proud boys gearing up for the ACB showdown to come?
Speaker 1: And James come is the worst? Buck Sextons coding the
Speaker 1: news and disseminating information. Who is actionable intelligence or make
Speaker 1: no mistake American, Let me you're a great American again.
Speaker 1: This is the Buck Sexton shows CIA analyst. I can
Speaker 1: speak to three hours without a phone call. Try doing
Speaker 1: that sometime. No welcome friends. Weeks away now, just just
Speaker 1: mere weeks away, almost almost exactly a month of the
Speaker 1: day until the election. And my, oh my, I cannot
Speaker 1: believe that we are still talking about whether the American
Speaker 1: people are going to vote for Joe Biden over Donald Trump.
Speaker 1: But here we are. It's a crazy world we live in,
Speaker 1: and there are people who certainly believe, fervently believe in
Speaker 1: the to the core of their being. Donald Trump will
Speaker 1: ruin the Republic. He's been president for four years and
Speaker 1: it's been pretty darned good. But he'll ruin the country
Speaker 1: if he gets four more years. That's what they think.
Speaker 1: And they've spent the last twenty four or forty eight
Speaker 1: hours now doing everything they can to try to get
Speaker 1: some lift out of this debate. I don't think that
Speaker 1: it worked for them at all. But their narratives after
Speaker 1: the first exchange between Trump and Biden on stage tell
Speaker 1: you a lot about what they're trying to do here,
Speaker 1: tells you a lot about what you're gonna hear in
Speaker 1: the weeks ahead. So for one thing, you know Joe Biden,
Speaker 1: you know, he's trying to tell everybody that he was
Speaker 1: the bigger man, he was the guy who was being
Speaker 1: a professional, real deal. In reality, Joe Biden called the
Speaker 1: actual president of the United States a clown, told him
Speaker 1: to shut up. So, and I'm not going to pretend
Speaker 1: like Trump was, you know, being gentlemanly on that stage.
Speaker 1: But let's just understand that this is a fight. Friends.
Speaker 1: We are in a dog fight, and the president is
Speaker 1: taking that approach shows Biden. But now Biden turns rent
Speaker 1: says he was mean black clip three, And what do
Speaker 1: you have to say to those undecided, persuadable voters who
Speaker 1: were watching last night and were just completely turned off
Speaker 1: by politics. I can understand it. It was I kind
Speaker 1: of thought at one point maybe I shouldn't say this,
Speaker 1: but the president of the United States conducting himself the
Speaker 1: way he did, I think it was just a national embarrassment.
Speaker 1: And but look, I just hope that the American people
Speaker 1: knows on the side of voters try to determine what
Speaker 1: each of us has. It's an answer for their concerns
Speaker 1: and allows us to actually speak. Yesterday, Notice that when
Speaker 1: he's not delivering canned lines. I mean, he was just
Speaker 1: a talking points machine in the debate against Trump. It's
Speaker 1: very obvious that he was. I could see, Oh, he's
Speaker 1: got he's going into now, he's going into his jobs,
Speaker 1: talking points, he's going into his the moment that you
Speaker 1: have to have a normal exchange with this guy, that's
Speaker 1: when you really see that it's kind of cloudy, the
Speaker 1: thing and the you know. But when he's able to
Speaker 1: stand on stage and recite what the political consultants have
Speaker 1: told him to he looks like a guy. Well, he
Speaker 1: doesn't look like guy who's about to fall asleep. Let's
Speaker 1: let's just be honest about that. But he does he
Speaker 1: does say things that I think are exactly what you
Speaker 1: would expect act if you were to read the comments
Speaker 1: section of a MSNBC or CNN dot com or something
Speaker 1: you'd see just the usual stuff. Trump is terrible as
Speaker 1: a racist, the COVID pandemic, and nothing inspiring, nothing encouraging.
Speaker 1: But on this point about Trump being mean, because you're
Speaker 1: going to see a lot of this now, I have
Speaker 1: a very different take on this, including that a lot
Speaker 1: of conservatives out there. I have a different feeling about
Speaker 1: the why is Trump being so mean or or why
Speaker 1: was he so rough with Biden? He this is another
Speaker 1: line from Biden on this play one. It was hard
Speaker 1: for me to believe that the president the United States
Speaker 1: would be so viciously classless and do what he did.
Speaker 1: I wasn't trying to look the whole we knew and
Speaker 1: he announced to his people, announced to all of you
Speaker 1: major outlets that they were going to try to just
Speaker 1: attack my family and to get me angry. And all
Speaker 1: I kept thinking was I just this is I wonder
Speaker 1: how many people had to take your kids away from
Speaker 1: the television, said this was going on just to say
Speaker 1: this and not who we are this and not who
Speaker 1: we are as a nation. That's all I kept thinking.
Speaker 1: It's not it's not who we are. Okay, Well, let's
Speaker 1: talk about who the Democrats in fact are, He says,
Speaker 1: the Trump here was so viciously classless, and he was
Speaker 1: very aggressive on the debate stage, and I wish he
Speaker 1: had pulled back a little bit, not because I have
Speaker 1: a problem with him being aggressive with Joe Biden, but
Speaker 1: because I would have liked to hear Biden actually be
Speaker 1: forced to answer certain things. And of course Chris Wallace
Speaker 1: was running interference with him, and it was a disgrace.
Speaker 1: But okay, classlessness, being mean, being being you know, not
Speaker 1: a fair player in this political drama. That's that's what
Speaker 1: they allege against Trump. Let's remind ourselves, friends, that the left,
Speaker 1: the Democrat Party, in the mainstream media, has for years
Speaker 1: said that Donald Trump is a traitor to his country,
Speaker 1: based on a fabrication, a Russia collusion lie cooked up
Speaker 1: by the Hillary Clinton campaign, no less paid for by
Speaker 1: Hillary Clinton donors, run through a foreigner using Russian subsources,
Speaker 1: spread Russian disinformation into the FBI and all across the media,
Speaker 1: to have a coup against the president of the United
Speaker 1: States to reverse the results of the election, or rather
Speaker 1: to undo what was done at the election. And let's
Speaker 1: also remember that the Democrats were not just planning to
Speaker 1: politically defeat Trump. They want to to this day and
Speaker 1: have done nothing but try to humiliate him, ruin him,
Speaker 1: and imprison him. They were trying to find criminal charges
Speaker 1: of any kind, and they would extend the law and
Speaker 1: ways that was obvious abuse. If they had to to
Speaker 1: throw Donald Trump in prison. They wanted to lock up
Speaker 1: his son, Donald Trump Junior. They wanted to send again,
Speaker 1: not for doing anything what Hillary Clinton did, because people
Speaker 1: always switched to this what Hillary Clinton did with those emails.
Speaker 1: I would have had if when I was a CIA officer,
Speaker 1: if I had done what Hillary did, I one hundred
Speaker 1: percent would have been forced to take some kind of
Speaker 1: a plea deal for criminal action. Maybe I would have
Speaker 1: avoided substantial jail time fine, but I would have had
Speaker 1: to take a criminal plea on the recklessness of one
Speaker 1: hundred counts of one hundred plus counts of classified information
Speaker 1: mishandled and part of my private server. And remember why
Speaker 1: she did it too. That whole system was set up
Speaker 1: so that Hillary could evade FOYA, so that Hillary wouldn't
Speaker 1: have Clinton Foundation donors emailing her on her and her
Speaker 1: Secretary of State accounts saying hey, I paid Bill a
Speaker 1: half a million dollars, I expect a meeting, which is
Speaker 1: of course why people pay Bill a half a million
Speaker 1: dollars for a speech when his wife is the Secretary
Speaker 1: of State. Give me a break, But she really did
Speaker 1: break the law, that wasn't They weren't trying to come
Speaker 1: up with some Logan Act violation or the emoluments clause
Speaker 1: or some of Hillary actually is a criminal. Oh no.
Speaker 1: Or you can believe that she's just so smart that
Speaker 1: she turned a thousand dollars into one hundred thousand dollars
Speaker 1: trading cattle futures when she was in Arkansas because she
Speaker 1: read about in the Wall Street Journal, which actually had
Speaker 1: zero coverage of cattle futures at that time. Or maybe
Speaker 1: it's because she had connections to the state Agriculture Board
Speaker 1: and who was actually running all But Hillary Clinton's a criminal, folks. Okay,
Speaker 1: She's broken plenty of laws. We all know her husband's
Speaker 1: it should be a convicted felon for perjury under oath,
Speaker 1: we all know that too. But they wanted to lock
Speaker 1: up Donald Trump's children. They were trying to the Democrat.
Speaker 1: This is open. You can find this online. They were
Speaker 1: trying to use state law in New York, use the
Speaker 1: district Attorney's office here to bring some charge that Donald
Speaker 1: Trump as president would be unable to pardon them, right,
Speaker 1: he couldn't get them out of it. And they wanted
Speaker 1: to send Donald Trump Junior, Jarrett, probably even Ivanka send
Speaker 1: him to prison. That's how they play the game. These people,
Speaker 1: the Democrats, could not be any dirtier in politics at
Speaker 1: this point. They could not be any more ruthless. They
Speaker 1: could not be any more underhanded, and they want to
Speaker 1: lecture Trump on being viciously classless. They have called the
Speaker 1: President of the United States a traitor, a rapist. They've
Speaker 1: said that he is not of sound mind, that he's
Speaker 1: actually insane. They call him now a white supremacist. They
Speaker 1: have called him the worst things you can be called
Speaker 1: in our country, with no evidence, with no justification other
Speaker 1: than orange man bad. They hate him, so whatever they
Speaker 1: say is justified. And now we're supposed to sit through
Speaker 1: lectures about decorum. Now we're supposed to pretend that the
Speaker 1: other side acts in good faith, in plays fair. How
Speaker 1: dumb are we going to be? Look at what Trump
Speaker 1: has been through. A normal person, a regular person who
Speaker 1: was put through the kind of pressure he's been under,
Speaker 1: not just being the president. I'm talking about being a
Speaker 1: president for whom the opposition views the only remedy as
Speaker 1: ruination and prison. They haven't even been waiting until the
Speaker 1: election to try to beat him. It was never about that.
Speaker 1: It was trying to stop him from getting to reelection,
Speaker 1: meaning getting to the actual running of a reelection campaign,
Speaker 1: and throwing him in prison when he was no longer president.
Speaker 1: That was the plan all along. They have called the
Speaker 1: president a traitor, one of the worst things you could
Speaker 1: possibly be. They've never apologized for this evil smear, not
Speaker 1: at all, and they just continue on with it. And
Speaker 1: they're going to lecture us about how the president deals
Speaker 1: with Joe Biden, a slimy fraud who says whatever he's
Speaker 1: got to say to get whatever he's got to get.
Speaker 1: Joe Biden stands for nothing other than the advancement of
Speaker 1: Joe Biden. And I really mean that. No, it's President
Speaker 1: Trump a narcissist. Does he want the grandeur of the Yeah? Absolutely.
Speaker 1: But Trump also stands for ideas, And I don't know.
Speaker 1: People can say, oh, well, he's changed from what he
Speaker 1: was the past. I don't care. He promotes those ideas
Speaker 1: with policies in office. He's a change from what was
Speaker 1: there before, and he'll continue to enact those changes if
Speaker 1: he has four more years in office. We've all seen
Speaker 1: what's really gone on with this pandemic, which they use,
Speaker 1: of course as a weapon against President Trump, pretending like
Speaker 1: the rest of the world hasn't had a terrible time
Speaker 1: with this as well. It's so unfair, it really is
Speaker 1: when you think about, just politically speaking, how they would
Speaker 1: have had an impossible uphill climb had it not been
Speaker 1: for the COVID nineteen pandemic. To convince people that Trump
Speaker 1: did do a great job, the first three years of
Speaker 1: the Trump presidency were fantastic, three of the best years
Speaker 1: I can remember America, relative peace, booming economy. Even the
Speaker 1: New York Times had to correct Joe Biden on saying
Speaker 1: that Trump inherited a booming economy. False. Some of us
Speaker 1: remember the Obama economy was the new normal of less
Speaker 1: than two percent GDP. The new normal of America's best
Speaker 1: days are behind it. Sorry, guys, got to redistribute the wealth.
Speaker 1: It slows things down, make every It makes everyone at
Speaker 1: a little less well off, a little less hopeful. But hey,
Speaker 1: the slogans hope and chain, So what are you gonna do?
Speaker 1: The media try to convince us that America was no
Speaker 1: longer capable to try to cover for Obama's ineptitude. The
Speaker 1: guy doesn't understand economics, he doesn't understand how a business runs.
Speaker 1: Neither's Joe Biden. But to cover up for that and
Speaker 1: the socialism that was dragging us all down that Obama
Speaker 1: was instituting, they pretended like America was not capable anymore
Speaker 1: of above two percent GDP GDP growth, that America was
Speaker 1: no longer capable of the real optimism that people feel
Speaker 1: like they have a shot, they have a chance going
Speaker 1: forward if they do the right things and if they
Speaker 1: work hard, they will get ahead. We're not all going
Speaker 1: to be billionaires, but we can all have a better
Speaker 1: life if we do the right things. That's the American promise.
Speaker 1: That's the America we all want to live in. And
Speaker 1: Trump was delivering on that. And now here we are
Speaker 1: being told that he doesn't care about the COVID pandemic,
Speaker 1: that he's a racist, that he's a traitor with this
Speaker 1: Russia thing. These people are insane. Trump is arguing with
Speaker 1: a mouthpiece for vicious, sadistic lunacy with Joe Biden. That's
Speaker 1: what he's arguing with We're supposed to ask him to
Speaker 1: play nice, don't throw any hard punches. It's just words, folks, right,
Speaker 1: their words, Trump's words. He can sit there and get abused.
Speaker 1: You know, he can be like a conservative on CNN.
Speaker 1: You're just there so they can throw food at you
Speaker 1: in the cage. That's what they do to people who
Speaker 1: are conservative at CNN. Or he can try to throw
Speaker 1: down and he threw down, and yeah, does he sometimes
Speaker 1: miss the mark? Is he sometimes a little scattered? Absolutely?
Speaker 1: But how many of you would tell a buddy of
Speaker 1: yours who was in a bar fight outnumbered five to one, Hey,
Speaker 1: you know when you grab that when you grab that stool,
Speaker 1: I don't know if you really had to go there.
Speaker 1: That guy only had a broken glass bottle, right, I
Speaker 1: mean this is what politically speaking, we're in the middle of.
Speaker 1: It is a street fight, and the other side plays
Speaker 1: as dirty as they possibly can. They want to lock
Speaker 1: up Trump's children, for Heaven's sake, And we're gonna get
Speaker 1: complaints from the media because the disaster, the corrupt disaster
Speaker 1: that his hunter by I didn't came up in the debate.
Speaker 1: What do we really expect? How can we think Trump
Speaker 1: is going to beat this monstrosity of the Democrats socialist left.
Speaker 1: If we're always telling him fight with one hand behind
Speaker 1: your back, if we're always telling him that's not, that's not.
Speaker 1: You know how William F. Buckley would have done it?
Speaker 1: Trump Trump baying Buckley. I don't know what else to say.
Speaker 1: He's doing it his way. Did we think that this
Speaker 1: fight was not going to get ugly? Just wait until
Speaker 1: you see what they say about ACB. It may not
Speaker 1: be able to stop her from becoming a Supreme Court justice,
Speaker 1: but they have no honor whatsoever. We are fighting a
Speaker 1: political opponent that has reached the heights of dishonor already
Speaker 1: does not repudiate any of it, and wants to continue
Speaker 1: down that path. And people are abandoning Trump or or
Speaker 1: or angry with Trump, criticizing Trump because he was fighting
Speaker 1: fire with fire. Friends, we either understand what this fight
Speaker 1: really means and what the stakes are and what we
Speaker 1: have to do, or we don't and we want the
Speaker 1: president to succeed in vanquishing this socialist left enemy once again,
Speaker 1: or we don't. It's a choice that we all get
Speaker 1: to make, along with our choice of who to vote for.
Speaker 1: You're in the freedom mind. This is the Buck Sex
Speaker 1: and Show podcast. But it was maddening to watch the
Speaker 1: president last night, angry and small, unable to show a
Speaker 1: scintilla of respect, unable to follow even the most basic
Speaker 1: rules of human civility or decorum, unwilling to constrain a
Speaker 1: stream of obvious falsehoods, and right wing file Shakespeare summed
Speaker 1: up in Macbeth's Trump's performance last night a tale told
Speaker 1: by an idiot full of sound and fury signifying nothing. Yes,
Speaker 1: President Trump's debate performance was, in the words of Macbeth,
Speaker 1: a tale told by an idiot full of sound and
Speaker 1: fury signifying nothing. Thanks for repeating that hackneyed line that
Speaker 1: we've all heard a million times, Chuck Schumer. Appreciate that, buddy.
Speaker 1: I'm just playing that for you to have a reminder
Speaker 1: of That's who want to play nice. We can get
Speaker 1: lectures from Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, because if Trump loses,
Speaker 1: you're also going to see down ballot carnage. Most likely,
Speaker 1: you want to have Chuck Schumer telling you what the
Speaker 1: future of the United States government's going to be looking
Speaker 1: like and what we're going to be doing. Chuck and Nancy,
Speaker 1: these are people that I have no respect for as people,
Speaker 1: never mind their ideas. They're frauds. They are rich elites
Speaker 1: pretending to care about the poor and minorities because it
Speaker 1: advances them. That's it. All rooted in hypocrisy, all rooted
Speaker 1: to do as I do, as I tell you to do,
Speaker 1: not as I would ever do. Yeah, I wasn't. I
Speaker 1: wasn't expecting Shakespearean oratory from Donald Trump in the debate.
Speaker 1: But I was expecting someone like Chuck schumerda reach all
Speaker 1: the way back to freshman year English or something to
Speaker 1: come up with a way of calling the President of
Speaker 1: the United States an idiot? Do you want a president
Speaker 1: who calls them idiot's back? You want a president who
Speaker 1: pulls him at Romney and curls up into a little
Speaker 1: ball and cries answer that for me. Thanks for listening
Speaker 1: to the Bus and Show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on
Speaker 1: Apple Podcasts, the iHeartRadio app, or wherever you get your podcasts.
Speaker 1: Good Heavens, Mika over if Morning Joe. It's just oh,
Speaker 1: it's so upset over how terrible, how terrible Trump Isn't
Speaker 1: all of those awful people who like Trump play twenty
Speaker 1: How could you watch that and want more of that.
Speaker 1: If you're still thinking about who to vote for, well
Speaker 1: and listen. There's an entire network that is covering this
Speaker 1: debate as if it was a proud moment for the president.
Speaker 1: And this situation has gone too far with a bunch
Speaker 1: of lobotomized hosts and anchors who are just waiting for
Speaker 1: his phone call, and it's pathetic. Here is the moment
Speaker 1: when you think about that, and if you think you
Speaker 1: want to debate that, here is the moment where the
Speaker 1: President of the United States refused to denounce white supremacist groups.
Speaker 1: Oh my gosh, we have to do this again. And
Speaker 1: you know I told you, I told you many months ago.
Speaker 1: They're going to recycle everything from twenty sixteen, as if
Speaker 1: we have not learned anything new, as if we have
Speaker 1: not already been through this, have not debunked some of
Speaker 1: their claims. We're going to go through all of it again,
Speaker 1: and we are. You see, Russia collusion, Russian interference in
Speaker 1: the action, Trump is a white supremacist. Oh that you're
Speaker 1: gonna hear something about the twenty fifth Amendment. Just give
Speaker 1: it a give it a week or two. Right, you're
Speaker 1: gonna hear something about Trump grabbed them by the P word.
Speaker 1: So yeah, that's that's expected. But we should understand every
Speaker 1: time that we're we're now having to talk about this
Speaker 1: and play defense, we should say this is all a
Speaker 1: plan that they're executing on then none of this is accidental,
Speaker 1: none of this is meant to be. Oh and Trump's taxes,
Speaker 1: of course, coming out right before the debate, a coordinated
Speaker 1: with the media, coordinated hit. Obviously a coordinated hit. So
Speaker 1: now you have Mika saying that Trump refuses to denounce
Speaker 1: white supremacists. That's a lie. So does it matter that
Speaker 1: it's a lie? I'm just wondering, does it matter to
Speaker 1: anybody Trump has? You can find it. There's plenty. It's
Speaker 1: on the record. He denounced white supremacists at that press
Speaker 1: conference after Charlottesville. He has denounced white supremacists many times
Speaker 1: since then. He said, of course I will on stage
Speaker 1: just just named them. Likely. But but Trump's point, which
Speaker 1: anyone who's being honest can see, is why are we
Speaker 1: even talking about white supremacists. Biden voters. Biden base voters
Speaker 1: have been terrorizing this country for months, like a bunch
Speaker 1: of little lunatics, have been running around lighting people's businesses
Speaker 1: on fire, looting stores, throwing rocks and bottles full of
Speaker 1: urine and bags of feces at police officers, shining lasers
Speaker 1: in their eyes to try to blind them, perhaps permanently.
Speaker 1: And yes, BLM supporting Democrats have murdered cops. And we're
Speaker 1: talking about white supremacists. Where are these white supremacists that
Speaker 1: they're what are these white supremacists rally? Where's this how opening? Oh?
Speaker 1: They well, we'll get into this some more. They bring
Speaker 1: up the Proud Boys. I believe that the national head
Speaker 1: of the Proud Boys is a minority, and he is
Speaker 1: on video and other scene interviews denouncing denouncing white supremacy, saying,
Speaker 1: we absolutely denounced white supremacy. So the media, it seems, is,
Speaker 1: you know, they're they're lying about this group. Not that
Speaker 1: I have any care connection for this group, honestly, I
Speaker 1: think that unfortunately they've played into the left hands here
Speaker 1: by creating this opportunity for them to pretend like this.
Speaker 1: It's almost like, ah, like one of these soccer support
Speaker 1: support clubs in Europe where they all drink together and
Speaker 1: like you know, they'll get into some bar fights and
Speaker 1: they don't like Antifa. That's from what I've seen again,
Speaker 1: it's it's a it's a loosely affiliated it is. It
Speaker 1: is an organization, there is, there is some loose affiliation.
Speaker 1: But isn't it fascinating? You know, you have to spend
Speaker 1: all your time denouncing the Proud Boys, and Biden can
Speaker 1: get away with not saying a nasty word about Antifa.
Speaker 1: It's just an idea, guys, just an idea. They're actually
Speaker 1: a threat to you. Is what is more likely, America
Speaker 1: that your business or your home is going to be mobbed,
Speaker 1: burned down and perhaps you and your family violently attacked
Speaker 1: by the Proud Boys or Antifa, by the Proud Boys
Speaker 1: or BLM Black Lives Matter, what's more likely? I know
Speaker 1: of not a single instance of the Proud Boys looting
Speaker 1: a store, burning down a building. And now again I'm
Speaker 1: not saying that their agenda. I don't even really know
Speaker 1: what their agenda is. I'm just saying, why are we
Speaker 1: talking about them? The whole national media has been fixated this.
Speaker 1: It's fixated on this, and all the dumbest people in
Speaker 1: the media of course just repeat of repeat the talk.
Speaker 1: But joint Baiha fourteen here you go. Just can I
Speaker 1: just say, well, I think, of course he doesn't denounce
Speaker 1: white supremacy, Sonny, because he is a white supremacist. Americans
Speaker 1: have to decide whether they want a white supremacist in
Speaker 1: the White House. We've never had it before. Maybe we
Speaker 1: didn't know we had it, but we certainly know we
Speaker 1: have it now, and that is the decision on November
Speaker 1: third that must be made. A white supremacist. How is
Speaker 1: he a white supremacist? Exactly? When? Never you got to this?
Speaker 1: They say, well, he didn't denounce, he won't denounce. This
Speaker 1: is the game that they play. It's all so stupid
Speaker 1: and unseemly. You know, this is the ultimate why or
Speaker 1: when did you stop beating your wife? Question? And they
Speaker 1: ask you that a hundred times, right, Imagine you're in
Speaker 1: a debate and the monitary kept saying, well, hold on
Speaker 1: a second, when did you stop eating your wife? You say,
Speaker 1: I've never beaten my wife, and that's a horrible question.
Speaker 1: Five minutes later, can you tell everybody for the record,
Speaker 1: just can you denounce wife beating for us? Please? Yeah,
Speaker 1: denounce wife beating. But you see, it's all meant to
Speaker 1: be insinuation and attack. That's what it is. Denounce it.
Speaker 1: Trump has denounced it. Why are Republicans always been told
Speaker 1: I have to dennounce white supremacy every election this comes up.
Speaker 1: Denounced white supremacy. You're like not going to be able
Speaker 1: to rent a home, get a job, or be safe
Speaker 1: in public if you're an actual white supremacist. But we're
Speaker 1: gonna pretend that this is some big problem across the country.
Speaker 1: We're gonna pretend like this is an ideology that has
Speaker 1: widespread supporter that we have to be so worried about.
Speaker 1: But you know, the left, the left believes in this fantasy.
Speaker 1: I mean, they're really out of their minds. They think
Speaker 1: that after months of cities being terrorized by Democrat Black
Speaker 1: Lives Matter supporters, that has been happening, that happened in
Speaker 1: my neighborhood. It wasn't the Proud Boys breaking windows looting
Speaker 1: stores in my neighborhood. Okay, I'm just living in reality here, folks.
Speaker 1: It was BLM, it was Antifa. And yet we're told
Speaker 1: the real, the real threat is the Proud Boys, and
Speaker 1: that the President hasn't done enough, hasn't done enough to
Speaker 1: denounce I give credit. You know, we had Hogan Gidley
Speaker 1: on the show earlier. By the way, it'll never be enough.
Speaker 1: He can never denounce them enough. They just want to
Speaker 1: keep that becomes their evidence for the accusation. Right, if
Speaker 1: you called somebody a child molester, Right, if you made
Speaker 1: that allegation against somebody and you had no evidence for it,
Speaker 1: which should be a horrendous thing to do. But this
Speaker 1: is what the Democrats called media and politics. If you
Speaker 1: called someone a child molester, which is really the worst
Speaker 1: thing that there could possibly be, and you have no
Speaker 1: evidence for it, you could always just keep saying, well,
Speaker 1: that person hasn't I mean, he hasn't denounced being a
Speaker 1: child molester enough. He hasn't announced child molestation enough, hasn't
Speaker 1: announced it? And notice how that that then it dirties
Speaker 1: you up right, you haven't denounced it enough. What the
Speaker 1: heck does it have to do with with the person
Speaker 1: being accused? Right, Well, we haven't announced it enough. It's
Speaker 1: all slime, it's smears, it's it's the trick of the propagandist.
Speaker 1: That's what they're doing with all of this. This is
Speaker 1: what this is all They knowed. They don't know how
Speaker 1: to be honest and truthful and brave and courageous and
Speaker 1: decent and kind and the left wing media, that's all
Speaker 1: laughable to them. They have no god other than the
Speaker 1: paychecks they receive from their corporate institutions, and whatever opinion
Speaker 1: among left wing Twitter is at any point in time
Speaker 1: that that's what really matters to them. Hogan Gidley, Fortunately,
Speaker 1: it is not going to just sit around and take
Speaker 1: this stuff. Here he is talking to Burman over at
Speaker 1: CNN and one of Zuckers many puppet anchors over there.
Speaker 1: Here he is on the history of Joe Biden when
Speaker 1: it comes to race play too. He said sure. He
Speaker 1: said sure three times. He has done it in the
Speaker 1: past multiple times. I don't know how many ways you
Speaker 1: want him to say it and how many times you
Speaker 1: want him to say it. Do you have any idea, John,
Speaker 1: what an exalted cyclops of the KKK is, because Joe
Speaker 1: Bidenshire does. He spoke in a funeral for one and
Speaker 1: praised him profusely. Any idea who George Wallace is? Joe
Speaker 1: Bidenshire does he thanks the person who gives him the awards? Listen,
Speaker 1: George Wallace has no listening any idea what a racial
Speaker 1: jungle is? So it's what Joe Biden doesn't want his
Speaker 1: kids to grow up in. Joe Biden's record in race
Speaker 1: is absolutely disgusting. Joe Bidald, Joe his problems American You
Speaker 1: were still in local television, John, You know one thing
Speaker 1: has a record of respect and understand these groups like
Speaker 1: nobody else. I'm sorry, I'm not going to sit here
Speaker 1: and did you call? The press refuses to notice what
Speaker 1: CNN does here. They know that, you know, bermanos he's
Speaker 1: getting steamrolled, so he just he he engages in intentional
Speaker 1: cross talk to muddy up the message. Wait what what Hogan? Hogan? Hogan, Hog,
Speaker 1: the guy's talking. He's your guest, you're on TV. Shut up,
Speaker 1: you knows otherwise he's going to get a call from
Speaker 1: Zucker's office. Hey, you can't let that Trump campaign press
Speaker 1: secretary role. You like that? Not on our air. This
Speaker 1: is Team Biden land, folks, this is it's It's Biden
Speaker 1: Country over at CNN. We all know that that couldn't
Speaker 1: be more any more obvious. But Joe Biden's history with
Speaker 1: all these issues is quickly forgotten. His vice president basically
Speaker 1: called him a racist. I mean, maybe not quite a
Speaker 1: full on racist, but like kind of some racisty stuff.
Speaker 1: That was his vice president and Democrats were all sure
Speaker 1: at the time. But you see what a Democrat calls
Speaker 1: another Democrat a racist, that's just that's just all in all,
Speaker 1: it's fair in politics, right. They don't mean it when
Speaker 1: they call a Republican a racist. It's your life should
Speaker 1: be ruined. Oh, they will absolutely find a way to
Speaker 1: call Amy Coney Barrett a racist. Amy Coney Barrett, mother
Speaker 1: of seven, including two adopted children from Haiti, a racist.
Speaker 1: It's going to happen, and get ready for that. These
Speaker 1: people have no shame. You have a lot of deeply
Speaker 1: narcissistic but wildly insecure people who work in the media
Speaker 1: that are supposed to be bringing the American people the
Speaker 1: truth and honesty and facts, and what they really do
Speaker 1: is promote not just themselves, of course, but promote this
Speaker 1: left wing belief system under the guise of objective journalism.
Speaker 1: And you'll see that in ways over the next few
Speaker 1: weeks that no matter how pared for it you are,
Speaker 1: it'll still make you want to spew on your shoes.
Speaker 1: So just get ready for it. It's gonna get ugly, folks.
Speaker 1: Trump is not going to be able to play this
Speaker 1: game delicately. You know this is not a three point contest.
Speaker 1: This is down in the paint throwing elbows, and people
Speaker 1: might want to put on a mouthpiece. That's the political
Speaker 1: contest we are in between now and not just November third,
Speaker 1: but whatever comes after it. Because I don't think this
Speaker 1: election is going to be decided on November third. I
Speaker 1: think we're going to go into a very dark period
Speaker 1: for the country of weeks of wrangling and fighting and
Speaker 1: lawsuits over all these ballots and all this, which Democrats
Speaker 1: have absolutely planned every step of the way. So I
Speaker 1: want you all prepared for this. I don't want you
Speaker 1: surprised as this happens. You know, I'm not always right,
Speaker 1: but on the big stuff, pretty much always right. You're
Speaker 1: in the Freedom This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast.
Speaker 1: Oh man, CNN, I swear that's the that's the worst
Speaker 1: media outlet in the country. Wall to wall white supremacy
Speaker 1: watch over at CNN. I mean, oh my gosh, this
Speaker 1: is what everyone's supposed to be terrified of. The the
Speaker 1: what is ninety nine point nine percent imaginary white supremacy
Speaker 1: threat that is out there there? There are there are
Speaker 1: no white supremacy groups that are marching through the streets
Speaker 1: attacking people. This is all crazy. Everyone hates white supremacists.
Speaker 1: No one likes white supremacists. What are they even talking about?
Speaker 1: Oh my god, I hope CNN here you go. They
Speaker 1: got another one of their little little flax doing the
Speaker 1: usual play eight here. It's kind of like Trump's very
Speaker 1: occasional condemnation of Russian election interference, une reluctantly under directs
Speaker 1: to compensate for constantly refusing to confront Vladimir Poop. For example,
Speaker 1: after his Both Sides comment's, Trump did give a good
Speaker 1: speech in which he condemned racist groups. Afterwards, according to
Speaker 1: bub Woodward, the President said that was the biggest mistake
Speaker 1: I've made and the worst speech I've ever given. Look
Speaker 1: from the Trump Famili's apparent refusal to rent to black
Speaker 1: families in the seventies to Michael Cohen hearing him say
Speaker 1: of post apartheid South Africa, Mandela the whole country, up
Speaker 1: to his defensive Confederate flags and monuments, It's easy to
Speaker 1: see an ugly pattern. Even noticed at DHS, we're somewhere
Speaker 1: concerned that political rhetoric used by the President has been
Speaker 1: viewed by some violent white supremacists as a call to
Speaker 1: violent action. I mean, they're just they're dirting the guy up. Well,
Speaker 1: what is it the Trump family refusal in the in
Speaker 1: the seventies, who refused and what were the grounds and
Speaker 1: what exactly? But not that you can't even keep up
Speaker 1: with all of this. What Joe Biden did in the seventies,
Speaker 1: you know, that will come out a long time ago.
Speaker 1: But this Trump allegation, it's it's interesting, isn't it, throwing
Speaker 1: all this together? Oh and Michael Cohen hearsay, there you go,
Speaker 1: Michael Cohen, grossest, biggest liar, imaginable. And it is to
Speaker 1: the President's discredit that he had him as his lawyer
Speaker 1: as long as he did. But you know, nobody's perfect.
Speaker 1: Oh but Michael Cohen said, the President said something about
Speaker 1: about Mandela and so now we're supposed to be the
Speaker 1: presidents are racist always in forever. I mean, it's look
Speaker 1: at the stuff they point to. If he were such
Speaker 1: a racist, they wouldn't have to keep lying about what
Speaker 1: he said at Charlottesville. Now, yeah, I mean, the President's
Speaker 1: obviously frustrated with that because he, you know, what was imprecise.
Speaker 1: He truly was just imprecise in his language. He did
Speaker 1: clarify it during that speech. But they just seized on it.
Speaker 1: But the Libs are so desperate. While they're seizing all
Speaker 1: all this authority and power with government, and they're engaging
Speaker 1: in the creation of a legal system of racial hierarchy
Speaker 1: in this country. You just had Gavin Newsom sign a
Speaker 1: bill in California, I think yesterday that says that you
Speaker 1: have to have a minority on the board of a
Speaker 1: company that's based in California. What's that's the quota? This
Speaker 1: is illegal. I mean, the Supreme Court's going to shred
Speaker 1: this eventually, but it'll take a while. While that's all
Speaker 1: going on, we're supposed to believe that the president is
Speaker 1: a secret white supremacist. Also, remember, if you listen to
Speaker 1: Joe Biden. According to Democrats, our entire system is racist
Speaker 1: and there's white supremacy all throughout it. Everything, the judicial system,
Speaker 1: law enforcement schools, everything, everything is white supremacist. So they're
Speaker 1: living in a world in which it is by definition
Speaker 1: impossible not to be surrounded by systems of white supremacy.
Speaker 1: And so what are we supposed to do exactly? Oh well,
Speaker 1: we all know what the answer is, right, just submit,
Speaker 1: put the left in charge, let them make all the
Speaker 1: decisions for you. Thanks. For listening to The Bus Sesson
Speaker 1: Show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on Apple podcasts, the iHeartRadio app,
Speaker 1: or wherever you get your podcasts. Can stop defunding the
Speaker 1: police like they've done in New York. Like that done
Speaker 1: in New York. I just told you I've always announced
Speaker 1: any form, any form, any form of any of that
Speaker 1: you have to denounce. But I also Joe Biden has
Speaker 1: to say something about Antifa. It's not a philosophy. These
Speaker 1: are people that hit people over the head with baseball bats.
Speaker 1: He's got to come out and he's got to be strong,
Speaker 1: and he's got to condemn Antifa, and it's very important
Speaker 1: that he does. Unrealistic. I condemn white supremacy, the President
Speaker 1: says in his Trumpian way, but he says it very clearly.
Speaker 1: You have to denounce it. Of course, you announce it.
Speaker 1: You have to announce any form of white sprems. Do
Speaker 1: you think that's going to stop the questions? This is
Speaker 1: this is the classic media of bias at work. Imagine
Speaker 1: if Joe Biden said, if he was willing to answer
Speaker 1: the question about court packing, and he gave a very clear,
Speaker 1: very decisive answer, no, I will not pack the Supreme Court,
Speaker 1: and then everywhere he went for the next month, journalists
Speaker 1: were shouting, are you going to break constitutional norms by
Speaker 1: packing the Supreme Court? You'd say, what's wrong with these journalists?
Speaker 1: Are they are they hard of hearing or something? What's
Speaker 1: the why? Why don't they didn't catch what the president said?
Speaker 1: It's already or rather what Biden said, it's already been
Speaker 1: made clear. But the point is not getting an answer.
Speaker 1: The question is an allegation. You all know what this means.
Speaker 1: You all know what this is like, and that's the
Speaker 1: whole point. This is the media doing Biden's work for him,
Speaker 1: which we all knew was going to happen. We all
Speaker 1: knew that was the case, and they certainly aren't going
Speaker 1: to try to promote Joe Biden's record. What is the
Speaker 1: great thing? This is a little bit like the aha
Speaker 1: moment when Hillary Clinton was Secretary of State and one
Speaker 1: of her spokespersons was asked to name I was I
Speaker 1: think it was one of the State Department press secretary
Speaker 1: people was asked to name one of the accomplishments of
Speaker 1: Hillary Clinton's time as Secretary of State, and it was
Speaker 1: crickets chirping. I mean, there was nothing you know, there
Speaker 1: was just a you know, oh, she flew a lot.
Speaker 1: Oh you mean the giant private jet which I've been
Speaker 1: on that the Secretary of State has. It's very nice. Yeah,
Speaker 1: you mean that she used that a lot of taxpayer
Speaker 1: expense to go on trips where people threw parties for
Speaker 1: her and she got to sit in meetings. Gee, we
Speaker 1: should all be so thankful for her service. But the
Speaker 1: real point was that there was nothing. They had nothing
Speaker 1: to say. And one of the problems that Joe Biden
Speaker 1: has and would be a big problem if the media
Speaker 1: was willing to focus on it, is that his record
Speaker 1: is one of just I mean, Joe Biden, in a
Speaker 1: sense is the ultimate mediocrity, you know. I mean he
Speaker 1: really reminds me of like Bill Paxton's character from True Lies,
Speaker 1: who's like, you know, hey, man, you know, you know
Speaker 1: this is the core Vette I got a few other
Speaker 1: interested buyers. You know. That's that's really who Joe Biden is.
Speaker 1: It's just all kind of ps and Trump calls him
Speaker 1: out on this because immedia is certainly not going to
Speaker 1: do it. Play eighteen last night, I did what the
Speaker 1: corrupt media has refused to do. I held Joe Biden
Speaker 1: accountable for his forty seven years of live, forty seven
Speaker 1: years at the trials, and forty seven years of fan year.
Speaker 1: I held Joe accountable for shipping your jobs and dreams
Speaker 1: abroad and for bowing to the violent mob at home.
Speaker 1: Can you imagine these people, the way they take over
Speaker 1: at these Democrats cities. I don't even believe it. The
Speaker 1: whole nation saw the truth. Did you see last night?
Speaker 1: Name one? I said, sleepy Joe, name one law enforcement
Speaker 1: group that supports you, and then Chris Wallace says, don't
Speaker 1: do that, that's not Can you believe this guy? I
Speaker 1: was debating two people last night. I mean he was
Speaker 1: debating two people, and it was the worst performance by
Speaker 1: debate monitator seen. It was even worse than Candy Crowley's.
Speaker 1: I'm sure he did say. He said, I'm sorry prision.
Speaker 1: Obama said it was terrorism. No, it's not actually true,
Speaker 1: but that's what you said in that Mit Romney debate.
Speaker 1: You'll remember. This is even worse. I think Chris Wallace
Speaker 1: debate was even worse. And it just goes to show you,
Speaker 1: even at that level, you've got a huge institution behind you,
Speaker 1: and you're getting paid millions of dollars and they can
Speaker 1: have anybody they want to do that debate, and they
Speaker 1: did not choose wisely. So Biden's record is something that
Speaker 1: we're just gonna be We're not even gonna be told
Speaker 1: to forget about it. They're just not gonna bring it
Speaker 1: up because what exactly is it? He was VP for
Speaker 1: eight years, completely riding on Obama's coattails, and what was
Speaker 1: the big thing that he did, What was the big
Speaker 1: accomplishment that he had? You know, you'd say, Buck, okay,
Speaker 1: what about any vice president? Well, I think if you
Speaker 1: look at Dick Cheney, the problem that we were told
Speaker 1: was that he was actually running the government. So I
Speaker 1: don't think any would say Dick Cheney didn't do anything
Speaker 1: when he was vice president under Bush. And you look
Speaker 1: at Pence right now, he's running the Coronavirus Task Force.
Speaker 1: One of the biggest parts of that has been supplies
Speaker 1: for the different states and institutions that are trying to
Speaker 1: deal with this pandemic, and the supply chain has been exceptional.
Speaker 1: There's been no shortages that have not been met. There's
Speaker 1: been no cupboard his bear sorry, you know, with the ventilators,
Speaker 1: with the PPE, all these things we heard about no
Speaker 1: the Coronavirus Task Force and the Defense Production Act, that's
Speaker 1: all been used. So if you really look at what
Speaker 1: Pence's role is on the Coronavirus Task Force, He's done
Speaker 1: a very He's done a very good job. And that
Speaker 1: would be one thing. He's only been VP for almost
Speaker 1: four years now, that would be one thing that you
Speaker 1: would certainly point to. But with Biden, and you're going
Speaker 1: to continue to see this play out. The whole point
Speaker 1: is that they just know his name, they know his face,
Speaker 1: and he's there. This is something I've come across in media,
Speaker 1: where there are people who no one really understands what
Speaker 1: they're good at, but they've put themselves in a good
Speaker 1: position and they've you know, clung to someone who is
Speaker 1: actually talented and made sure they either right before right
Speaker 1: after that talent, and after a while enough people just
Speaker 1: get used to seeing that guy or gal's face and
Speaker 1: or void you're hearing their voice and you're just like, okay,
Speaker 1: I mean, you know, it's we're all creatures of habit, right,
Speaker 1: We're all there's a reason why when I'm folding laundry,
Speaker 1: I'll throw on some show on Netflix that I've seen
Speaker 1: a hundred times and kind of half watch in the
Speaker 1: background because there's a comfort to just I've already seen this,
Speaker 1: but I'm betta, you know, we we like what we're
Speaker 1: used to. And Joe Biden, for all of his obvious
Speaker 1: flaws and all the downside, for a lot of people,
Speaker 1: they're just like, well, you know, he's been around and
Speaker 1: guy hasn't He hasn't nuked Switzerland, So you know, how
Speaker 1: bad can you really be? You know, Trump? They might say,
Speaker 1: it is a little bit of a departure from norm right,
Speaker 1: he's a little bit aggressive, whatever it is. And so
Speaker 1: that's the whole pitch here. You either hate Trump, which
Speaker 1: is forty seven percent forty eight percent of people who
Speaker 1: vote Democrat, I mean, and they've actually just been trained
Speaker 1: to hate him, not to disagree with him, not to
Speaker 1: view him as someone who can be a little rough
Speaker 1: around the edges, or that they just don't like what
Speaker 1: he stands for on policy. They have a personal disdain
Speaker 1: for him, which is why people on the left think
Speaker 1: it's totally normal to find out that someone's a Trump
Speaker 1: supporter and to hate that person too, because you're supporting
Speaker 1: a person that they deeply despise as an individual. It's
Speaker 1: not even just oh, you know, you're a Republican, you
Speaker 1: support the Republican president. It's you support Trump, I hate Trump.
Speaker 1: That's their attitude. That's the way that they view all
Speaker 1: of this. And with Biden, it's, oh, Joe, he's supposed
Speaker 1: to be inoffensive. He's almost a knock you is, you know,
Speaker 1: he's old guys up there, and I'm just we're gonna
Speaker 1: build back better and all this stuff. When we saw
Speaker 1: the Obama buiding economy was garbage. It was bad compared
Speaker 1: to what it should have been based on all the metrics,
Speaker 1: all the numbers. It was a slow, bad recovery. Why
Speaker 1: because Obama and Biden think that taking money from people
Speaker 1: other people. Of course they're Obama and Biden are both
Speaker 1: super rich themselves, of course, but taking money from other
Speaker 1: people and spreading it around via government is just the
Speaker 1: right thing to do. Remember when Obama said that it's
Speaker 1: the right thing to do. So that's what you do,
Speaker 1: even if it means that people are going to invest
Speaker 1: less higher fewer people spend spend less money, you know,
Speaker 1: on long term investments. That's that's what they want. That's
Speaker 1: what they think feels right to them, And even if
Speaker 1: it means everyone is worse off collectively throughout the economy.
Speaker 1: It's it's about the moral choice. I remember, socialism is
Speaker 1: really a religious creed without God. I mean, it's it's
Speaker 1: all about what the people in charge think feels fair.
Speaker 1: It goes against human nature, which is why socialism, ultimately,
Speaker 1: everywhere where it has tried and its totality, it fails miserably.
Speaker 1: You can have some socialist sectors within a broader, more
Speaker 1: free market economy, and the free market will prop up
Speaker 1: enough the socialist entities within it. But if you go
Speaker 1: full socialist, the whole thing collapses. But we don't even
Speaker 1: have really this discussion. I mean, is Joe Biden. Is
Speaker 1: Joe Biden a socialist? Folks, there's a question that we
Speaker 1: should ask. I mean, is he because the Democratic Party
Speaker 1: is Bernie Sanders is, But what is Joe Biden? What
Speaker 1: does he really stand for as a politician? And just
Speaker 1: even the issue of the Green New Deal for example, Oh,
Speaker 1: it's not clear. I mean he said that he wasn't
Speaker 1: for it, but his website says no, it's built around
Speaker 1: the Green New Deal. So this is which this is
Speaker 1: exactly the approach they want to have it both ways.
Speaker 1: He is both four and against the Green New Deal,
Speaker 1: just like with John Kerry. Remember mister flip flop John Kerry,
Speaker 1: I was I was four of the Iraq War before
Speaker 1: I was against it, right. Remember that This is this
Speaker 1: is how they play the game. They cannot be straightforward
Speaker 1: with the American people about what they want to do
Speaker 1: because the American people would reject there, they would reject
Speaker 1: their plans, they'd reject their policies. This is why Chuck
Speaker 1: Schumer says about the Green New Deal and Joe Biden
Speaker 1: the following play eleven. We first have to elect a majority.
Speaker 1: If we don't elect a majority, we won't even be
Speaker 1: discussing it. But if we do elect a majority, we'll
Speaker 1: all get together and everything will be on the table.
Speaker 1: Nothing will be off the table. On climate. The bottom
Speaker 1: line is we are looking already at ways we can
Speaker 1: get comprehensive climate legislation done, and they're a variet idea
Speaker 1: of different ways, and we're exploring all of them. It
Speaker 1: is one of our highest priorities and we are going
Speaker 1: to get something very strong and bold done. Comprehensive climate
Speaker 1: legislation that should terrify you. Just going to be massive
Speaker 1: giveaways to the government, to left wing advocacy groups. It's
Speaker 1: going to just annoy you for no purpose. It's going
Speaker 1: to be mask mandates times a thousand. That's what you're
Speaker 1: going to see with comprehensive climate legislation if they get it. Oh,
Speaker 1: if you don't, you know, if you don't recycle, you're
Speaker 1: a bad person and we have to we have to
Speaker 1: punish you. You're not allowed to get the car you
Speaker 1: want anymore. You're gonna get the car that we tell
Speaker 1: you have to get. Your electricity bills are going to
Speaker 1: go up. Sorry, got to have more renewables. Oh, you
Speaker 1: have less money to pay for essentials like groceries and healthcare.
Speaker 1: Too bad. The planets at stake, get ready for it.
Speaker 1: This is the left's real religion. I wish the Christians
Speaker 1: and the other actually the other believers, uh, you know,
Speaker 1: believers in God on the left would wake up because
Speaker 1: they're just uh, they're they're an afterthought. The real God
Speaker 1: on the left, or rather, the real religion is climate
Speaker 1: change and the real God is Earth. That's that's the truth.
Speaker 1: It's really a pagan it's really a pagan belief system.
Speaker 1: The Democrats adhere to. You now, just it's very clear.
Speaker 1: Just break it all down, you see it. Jack Schumer's
Speaker 1: got no problem with anym it. You're in the freedom
Speaker 1: of This is the Buck Sex and Show Podcast. I'll
Speaker 1: protect your right to healthcare and build on and improve
Speaker 1: the Affordable Care Act. I'll always tell you the truth.
Speaker 1: I'll always care about you, whether you vote for me
Speaker 1: or not. If elected, I'm not going to be a
Speaker 1: Democratic president. You're gonna be an American president, whether you
Speaker 1: voted for me or not. I'm gonna be your president.
Speaker 1: And I'll never forget the people, the working people this country,
Speaker 1: because that's where I come from. Whether you vote from
Speaker 1: me or not, I'm gonna be your president. I do
Speaker 1: think the Democrats that is their plan. Whether the American
Speaker 1: people actually choose Biden or not, they're gonna try to
Speaker 1: make him the president. I think that that's unintentionally tipping
Speaker 1: the hand a little bit, or speaking an unintentional truth there.
Speaker 1: It doesn't matter who the American people really want, They're
Speaker 1: getting Joe Biden one way or the other. I think
Speaker 1: that is the plan. We saw the most recent undercover
Speaker 1: journalism of the ballot harvesting in Minnesota. I'm sure some
Speaker 1: of the things are happening elsewhere, and there's so much
Speaker 1: more both errors and fraud in the election than anybody
Speaker 1: realized at this point. But no one's no one's gonna
Speaker 1: blow the whistle on it right now because they're just
Speaker 1: hoping that it helps it helps Biden win. In some ways.
Speaker 1: It's also reckless and crazy, isn't it. But Biden as
Speaker 1: a uniter is so interesting. Did Biden unite when he
Speaker 1: was the vice president? I mean, was the Obama administration
Speaker 1: about bringing America together? I think we have to go
Speaker 1: back and remember this. I think that there's gonna be
Speaker 1: a little bit of well not selective amnesia from the
Speaker 1: Democrat They're just gonna I mean, the media is gonna
Speaker 1: lie about this stuff. But I do recall. I mean
Speaker 1: I do look back now and see that the Obama
Speaker 1: administration's attitude was we won, you lost, deal with it.
Speaker 1: That was the Obama. Obama Administration's attitude from day one,
Speaker 1: across the board for eight years. We have power, you
Speaker 1: don't suck it up. We don't care how many how
Speaker 1: many Republican votes, I mean, there are four hundred and
Speaker 1: thirty five members of the United States Congress, how many
Speaker 1: Republican votes were there for Obamacare zero zero and Obamacare
Speaker 1: is you know, really ended up doing some things. It
Speaker 1: did not get to universal coverage. It was largely an
Speaker 1: expansion of Medicaid and also an intrusion into the individual marketplace.
Speaker 1: The only thing anybody thinks about her knows about Obamacare
Speaker 1: these days though, Oh the pre existing conditions. They will forget.
Speaker 1: The true pre existing conditions that would be considered unensurable
Speaker 1: except in very special high risk pools are very rare.
Speaker 1: Now that doesn't mean that those people should be left
Speaker 1: to fend for themselves, quite the opposite. But there's this belief.
Speaker 1: I think Biden even said that there's like one hundred
Speaker 1: million pre existing conditions, or Democrats used to say that
Speaker 1: being a woman is a pre existing condition. I mean,
Speaker 1: there's just nonsense. There's actually not pre existing conditions. I
Speaker 1: do wish that the Trump campaign would come forward with
Speaker 1: a more definitive healthcare plan, but you know, John McCain
Speaker 1: didn't want to help get the Trump plan through the
Speaker 1: first time. Remember that. Nope, didn't want to do it,
Speaker 1: and so the Republicans when they had the House and
Speaker 1: the Senate, were unable to get through the kind of
Speaker 1: legislation that would have really been meaningful. Now they also
Speaker 1: left the filibuster in place, So I think what Democrats
Speaker 1: plan to do is to get rid of the filibuster
Speaker 1: and then do whatever they want. But Biden was a
Speaker 1: part of an administration that was very divisive, and I'm
Speaker 1: not going to pretend like the Trump administration isn't divisive.
Speaker 1: But this this idea that Biden's a great uniter and
Speaker 1: going to bring everyone together based in what why should
Speaker 1: anyone believe that? I mean, he's saying all the most
Speaker 1: horrible things possible about President Trump. What is it exactly
Speaker 1: that makes him any different from these other Democrats who
Speaker 1: suffer from Trump's arrangement syndrome and take a scorched earth
Speaker 1: approach to everything that they're doing in politics these days.
Speaker 1: You know, the derangement is very real among Democrats when
Speaker 1: it comes to trumpet It spread very far, and it
Speaker 1: even existed at the top of the f B. I
Speaker 1: theel you asked for a miracle, I give you the
Speaker 1: f and James Coomy used to run the FBI, which
Speaker 1: should make everybody really can really concerned about the chief
Speaker 1: federal law enforcement agency in the United States. I don't think.
Speaker 1: I don't think it's possible to know that Comy was
Speaker 1: running that thing and feel like that was that was good.
Speaker 1: I think that that's um big problem. So just gonna
Speaker 1: put that out there. James Coomy sank to Comy giant
Speaker 1: unself conscious weirdo. He is both a giant weirdo and
Speaker 1: a giant who is a weirdo. He testified yesterday and
Speaker 1: he did the usual, the Coomy two step, the Potomac
Speaker 1: two step Jack. He did the Coomy two step where
Speaker 1: he's just you know, I don't recall, oh, I just
Speaker 1: you know, he answers all these questions too, like he's
Speaker 1: he's a monk and he's in the monastery or something.
Speaker 1: He's like, it's like, well, that's a that's a very
Speaker 1: interesting philosophical question. Did I in fact lie on that
Speaker 1: sheet about whether or not this person was a Russian asset?
Speaker 1: I I cannot really recall right now, sir, the statement
Speaker 1: that you're you know, it's all very games. It's just
Speaker 1: playing games. It's all obvious when you listen to this
Speaker 1: guy the way that he does this. Play thirteen here's
Speaker 1: called me yesterday on a scale of one to ten,
Speaker 1: with ten being the top of the line. Right, How
Speaker 1: would you rank rate the Crossfire Hurricane investigation in terms
Speaker 1: of being done thoroughly by the book, an investigation the
Speaker 1: FBI should be proud of. I'm not sure I can
Speaker 1: apply a number scale, but I would say, in the
Speaker 1: main it was done by the book, It was appropriate,
Speaker 1: and it was essential that it be done. Okay, so
Speaker 1: you're proud of it. Overall, I'm proud of the work.
Speaker 1: There are parts of it that are concerning, which I'm
Speaker 1: sure we'll talk about, but overall, I'm proud of the
Speaker 1: work over all. He's proud of it. Of course he is,
Speaker 1: what a what a disgrace, Proud of the investigation of
Speaker 1: the Trump campaign for Russia ties that did not exist,
Speaker 1: Proud of the lives ruined as a result of this
Speaker 1: fairy tale that Donald Trump worked with the Russians. You know,
Speaker 1: does he want to sit down? I would really love
Speaker 1: to have Roger Stone get to sit at a table
Speaker 1: with James Comey and have him say that he's proud
Speaker 1: of the work that crossed By Hurricane did. And then,
Speaker 1: of course, the follow up Special Council investigation sending dozens
Speaker 1: of agents into Roger Stone's home at five am. Remember,
Speaker 1: no knock warrants are horrible, but sending a swat team
Speaker 1: in to get Roger Stone at five am for this
Speaker 1: guy's a senior citizen. It's a completely non violent, non
Speaker 1: threatening BS crime to begin with, Yes, you okay, you
Speaker 1: cannot line your oath, but he never should have been
Speaker 1: asked the questions first place, so you can't line to oath.
Speaker 1: But let's let's keep this in perspective. Comy, he's gonna skate, folks.
Speaker 1: I know there are people that will go on air
Speaker 1: and they will tell you, oh, James Comey is going
Speaker 1: to he's gonna get his one day. He already got his,
Speaker 1: like a two million dollar advance for his book. And
Speaker 1: James Coombe's doing just fine. He's doing he's doing great actually,
Speaker 1: despite all the stuff that he's not. People know who
Speaker 1: are paying attention, who know what he's really all about
Speaker 1: and what kind of a person he is. But it's
Speaker 1: gotta be honest with you, folks. James Comey is he's
Speaker 1: gonna get away with it. So make it a bitter
Speaker 1: thing for me to have to say, but he's going
Speaker 1: to get away with it. Thanks for listening to the
Speaker 1: bus Sesson Show podcast. Remember to subscribe on Apple podcasts,
Speaker 1: the iHeart Radio app, or wherever you get your podcasts.
Speaker 1: Want to get a word straight from the campaign about
Speaker 1: what they're planning, how they're feeling, and what's coming up next.
Speaker 1: And for that we have Mark Lodder with us now.
Speaker 1: He is the director of strategic communications for the Trump campaign. Mark,
Speaker 1: great to have you back. Thanks for having me Buck.
Speaker 1: So first tell me, you know, how was your debate night?
Speaker 1: Where were you What were your big takeaways as somebody
Speaker 1: who's doing strategic colms for the campaign. Yeah, I was
Speaker 1: in a Lacrosse, Wisconsin at a minor league baseball stadium
Speaker 1: with about four hundred people who came out in fifty
Speaker 1: degree weather to watch it, and you'd have thought a
Speaker 1: baseball game was going on. There was so much hooting
Speaker 1: and hollered and cheering, even a few booze. But they
Speaker 1: were excited and they left that. They left that debate
Speaker 1: and they were telling me that what we saw in
Speaker 1: President Trump and his battle with Joe Biden and even
Speaker 1: with Chris Wallace was the same man they want fighting
Speaker 1: for their jobs and fighting for America and fighting for
Speaker 1: our interests first. And what they saw was that fighter
Speaker 1: night and they left, They left fired up, energized and
Speaker 1: ready to go to work. What were the top issues?
Speaker 1: I'm sure this must have come up in your conversations,
Speaker 1: from you asking them or just I would assume people
Speaker 1: would tell you, you know, what do they want to
Speaker 1: hear more about from the president or what are the
Speaker 1: areas we're going forward? Do you think the campaign is
Speaker 1: going to put the greatest focus? Well, I think that
Speaker 1: you know, most people are are shocked when they hear
Speaker 1: the actual record of Joe Biden and his forty seven
Speaker 1: years of failure in Washington, DC. And the President highlighted
Speaker 1: that during the debate, and you know a lot of
Speaker 1: people didn't remember that Joe Biden voted for NAFTA, which
Speaker 1: ship jobs overseas, and was a champion of TPP and
Speaker 1: a cheerleader for China in the World Trade Organization, which
Speaker 1: cost Americans their jobs. And that's a very blue collar community.
Speaker 1: And I'm in Iowa right now again, blue collar agriculture,
Speaker 1: and they know that President Trump is fighting for them.
Speaker 1: They want to hear more about the President's plans, but
Speaker 1: they also are learning a lot about Joe Biden that
Speaker 1: they forgot and how he really put their interests, their jobs,
Speaker 1: and their families at risk. Now, Mark, we're speaking to
Speaker 1: Mark Lauder, director of strategic communications for the Trump campaign. Mark,
Speaker 1: the constant asking of the same question I've been telling
Speaker 1: the audience today on the show, it's very clear to
Speaker 1: me why this is done right. It's very clear to
Speaker 1: me that this is meant to be. You know, when
Speaker 1: did you stop eating your wife? Essentially, but you know
Speaker 1: you do strategic communications. Is there a point at which
Speaker 1: you know what can be done to counter the will
Speaker 1: you denounce white supremacist question? When the President has now
Speaker 1: answered this so many times and denounced so many times
Speaker 1: that you have to wonder what the heck is wrong
Speaker 1: with the journalists asking the question. Yeah, you wonder if
Speaker 1: the mainstream media and the liberals will ever take yes
Speaker 1: for the answer, because he keeps saying it over and
Speaker 1: over again. I remember this question in the twenty sixteen
Speaker 1: campaign and he denounced it. I remember it in the
Speaker 1: White House and he denounced it, and he'd announced it again,
Speaker 1: and yet they just won't take yes for an answer.
Speaker 1: And so it's just their way of trying to create
Speaker 1: this fake distraction because they know that Joe Biden's campaign
Speaker 1: is imploding. They know that he showed America on that
Speaker 1: debate stage he couldn't condemn Antifa. It's not an idea
Speaker 1: that was rioting, looting and arson in our major cities.
Speaker 1: It was a group of that is organized in terror
Speaker 1: that was doing those things and Joe Biden can't even
Speaker 1: condemn that. And so what we see is that they'll
Speaker 1: just continue to focus on whatever they want to focus on,
Speaker 1: trying to help Joe Biden, but it's really a disservice
Speaker 1: to the American people. Can you give us some sense
Speaker 1: of what the campaign, how the campaign is going to
Speaker 1: respond to this new debate format and is there you know,
Speaker 1: tell me what do you think about that? And also
Speaker 1: is it a serious possibility that the Biden camp may
Speaker 1: pull out of one or both of the next debates
Speaker 1: in your mind? Well, you never know when it comes
Speaker 1: to their plans. I mean, obviously they do not. They've
Speaker 1: done everything possible to try to hide and shield Joe
Speaker 1: Biden from the American people. And you've already before the
Speaker 1: first debate had a lot of Democrat leaders saying he
Speaker 1: shouldn't debate at all because they were worried about, you know,
Speaker 1: about Joe Biden continuing to look bad on a national stage.
Speaker 1: But I mean, as our campaign has said, I mean,
Speaker 1: this is just another example of the mainstream media, the
Speaker 1: liberals in Washington, DC, the swamp, changing the rules whenever
Speaker 1: their candidate, you know, gets pasted like he did by
Speaker 1: Donald Trump. And so here we go again. They're going
Speaker 1: to try to change the debate rules in midstream just
Speaker 1: because their preferred candidate did badly. He's not a negotiation.
Speaker 1: How does that work with this Commission on Debates? They
Speaker 1: go to both the campaigns. I mean, just just give
Speaker 1: us a little bit of a peak behind the curtain
Speaker 1: with that. I mean, can you guys say no, we're
Speaker 1: not going to have Mike's cut off by I don't know.
Speaker 1: I mean the next debate moderator has he has he
Speaker 1: already been picked? Who is it? Because wherever it is,
Speaker 1: I'm probably not going to trust the person. Well I
Speaker 1: forget the name, but they've already been named. And I
Speaker 1: do know that Susan Page from USA Today will be
Speaker 1: actually moderating the vice presidential debate on Wednesday. But there's
Speaker 1: ongoing discussions with the campaigns on this, as you saw
Speaker 1: in the run up to Tuesday's debate. You know, we
Speaker 1: were obviously asking with Joe Biden at least let us
Speaker 1: look to make sure he's not wearing an earpiece so
Speaker 1: we know that he's not getting fed the answers or
Speaker 1: fed one liners from them from his team backstage. They
Speaker 1: refused that they had asked for multiple breaks during a
Speaker 1: nineteen minute debate, something that we had refused. So there's
Speaker 1: always those ongoing discussions. I'm not going to get involved
Speaker 1: obviously what currently is being done, because I'm actually on
Speaker 1: the road here with the Vice President uh in Iowa
Speaker 1: and not in Washington, DC, next to where all those
Speaker 1: discussions are happening. Speaking to Mark Ladder, director of Strategic
Speaker 1: Communications the Trump campaign, you mentioned the VP around the
Speaker 1: road with them. Now give us a look ahead to
Speaker 1: what the what the VP's going to be doing to
Speaker 1: make his case for the administration across the country and
Speaker 1: what the American people will be seeing, at least those
Speaker 1: of us who care about what the Trump campaign's doing
Speaker 1: for the next week or two. Well, you know, we're
Speaker 1: gonna keep on the road, and it's not just here
Speaker 1: like an today with the Vice President where he'll not
Speaker 1: only be talking to the people of Iowa, but there
Speaker 1: is a key congressional district in Nebraska, which is obviously
Speaker 1: right next door. That also is important to us retaking
Speaker 1: control of the House of Representatives. But it's also important
Speaker 1: in the electoral College because the way Nebraska is one
Speaker 1: of those unique states, there's only two that actually awards
Speaker 1: their electoral College votes a little differently than everyone else.
Speaker 1: So that's it's a very important stop here. You're going
Speaker 1: to continue to see the president out on the road,
Speaker 1: I mean, and we also have bus tours. I'm getting
Speaker 1: ready to get on one across the state of Iowa
Speaker 1: for three days myself. You're going to see not only
Speaker 1: the President, the vice president, the key campaign officials, the
Speaker 1: president's children out there in those battleground states. And you know,
Speaker 1: Joe Biden might call him. He called a breakfast lid,
Speaker 1: you know, apparently a little after eleven o'clock today. It's
Speaker 1: like we're going to be out there working full time.
Speaker 1: Nobody can keep up with President Trump, but we're going
Speaker 1: to do our best to try. You're a professional, you
Speaker 1: work in this area. I just got to ask this
Speaker 1: calling of lids by the Biden campaign, how unusual is
Speaker 1: this and what the heck is going on? Well, you
Speaker 1: really have to ask yourself. I mean, obviously it's clear
Speaker 1: what their strategy is. They just don't want to make
Speaker 1: any news. I mean, that's why you get Joe Biden
Speaker 1: out there not even answering the question from Chris Wallace
Speaker 1: about what he thinks about packing the court. And it's
Speaker 1: interesting that he says it's a distraction created by President Trump. No,
Speaker 1: it's a distraction created by his party. It was his
Speaker 1: party's leaders who are talking about nothing being off the table,
Speaker 1: eliminating the fillibuster, eliminating the electoral college, packing the Supreme Court.
Speaker 1: I mean, just like what we're seeing going on with
Speaker 1: these debates, they're just willing to change the rules whenever
Speaker 1: they don't get the outcome that they like. They're like children,
Speaker 1: you know that they don't like it, they'll take their
Speaker 1: ball and go home. And so we're not going to
Speaker 1: fall for that. We're going to continue asking those questions.
Speaker 1: We're going to continue getting out there talking to the people.
Speaker 1: There's hundreds upon hundreds of people that come out a
Speaker 1: thousands for the president and for the vice president. But
Speaker 1: even with our bus tours, we're getting hundreds of people.
Speaker 1: We're out there, not ondoors reaching voters directly where they live,
Speaker 1: and there is such energy to elect this president though
Speaker 1: you know, things are looking very good for us and
Speaker 1: continuing to improve base turnout or independence. What do you think,
Speaker 1: when all said and done, is going to be the
Speaker 1: defining category for who wins this election. Well, I think
Speaker 1: it's all of the above. I mean, obviously, we want
Speaker 1: to make sure that we get everybody out from that
Speaker 1: supports this president, loves this country, and make sure they
Speaker 1: get out their vote and make sure it gets counted.
Speaker 1: You know, Independence, they're going to make their decision, and
Speaker 1: typically they make their decision late in the process. We're
Speaker 1: going to continue fighting for them as well, because the
Speaker 1: choice here is stark. I mean, we are a recovering
Speaker 1: economy from the pandemic, and we've still got a ways
Speaker 1: to go, but we are on the road ahead of
Speaker 1: where we should have been. And yet Joe Biden is
Speaker 1: talking out there about putting four trillion dollars in taxes
Speaker 1: on the economy and taking away you know, adding a
Speaker 1: bunch of new regulations. That's not the way to keep
Speaker 1: the economy growing. That's going to put it back into
Speaker 1: a tail spin. And so I think a lot of
Speaker 1: people out there. Notice that they know that Joe Biden
Speaker 1: has said he wants to shut it all down again.
Speaker 1: That's not what America wants. They want to get back
Speaker 1: out there to work, They want to get back out
Speaker 1: there to school, and they know that President Trump is
Speaker 1: the only one who's doing it. Yeah. I hope everybody remembers.
Speaker 1: One area where Joe Biden does have considerable expertise is
Speaker 1: in weak economic recoveries. So he's got some ability on
Speaker 1: that one. Mark Lot everybody, Director of Strategic Communications for
Speaker 1: the Trump campaign, Mark good luck out there, Get the
Speaker 1: Vice President my best and thanks so much for joining us. Absolutely,
Speaker 1: but can tuck you again. You're in the freedom hud.
Speaker 1: This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast. Friends, There's no
Speaker 1: good faith reason to ask a question over and over
Speaker 1: again when you don't plan to accept the answer, no
Speaker 1: matter how many times it's given. But our media doesn't care.
Speaker 1: And that's why our national media is unsalvageable. Kaylee McKinney,
Speaker 1: though she's smacking some fools around today at the White
Speaker 1: House on exactly this issue, We're gonna We're gonna let
Speaker 1: you really hear this. We're gonna air out this exchange.
Speaker 1: Lets you really get into this play it statement without
Speaker 1: ambiguity or deflection as the person who speaks for the president.
Speaker 1: Does the President denounce white supremacism and roots that espoused
Speaker 1: in a pall of your force. This has been answered
Speaker 1: yesterday by the President himself. The day before by the
Speaker 1: President himself on the debate stage. The President was asked this,
Speaker 1: he said shure at three times yesterday he was point
Speaker 1: blink asked do you denounce white supremacy? And he said,
Speaker 1: I've always denounced any form of that. I can go
Speaker 1: back and read for you in August twenty nineteen and
Speaker 1: one voice, our nation must condemn racism, bigotry, and white
Speaker 1: supremacy in August of twenty seventeen. Racism is evil and
Speaker 1: those who cause violence in its name are criminals and thugs,
Speaker 1: including the KKK, Neo Nazis, white supremacists, and other hate groups.
Speaker 1: I have an entire list of these that I can
Speaker 1: go through with you. He has condemned whiteacy more than
Speaker 1: any president in modern history. Just to clear it up
Speaker 1: this morning, can you naming it? Make it declaring a
Speaker 1: statement that you deno that the President announced I just did.
Speaker 1: The President has denounced this repeatedly. The president was asked,
Speaker 1: this you're making, You're contriving a storyline and a meritage.
Speaker 1: He said to rest, I just did. I read you
Speaker 1: all of the clothes, and if you need to see
Speaker 1: them in writing, I will put them in an email
Speaker 1: pull up. So can you right now denounce white supremacy
Speaker 1: and the group. And the President has announced white supremacy,
Speaker 1: the KKK and hate groups in all forms. He signed
Speaker 1: a resolution to that effect. The president just last week,
Speaker 1: perhaps you all weren't covering it, but just last week
Speaker 1: expressed his desire to see the KKK prosecuted as domestic terrorist.
Speaker 1: This president had advocated for the death penalty for a
Speaker 1: white supremacist, the first federal execution in seventeen years. His record.
Speaker 1: This is unmistakable, and it's shameful that the media refuses
Speaker 1: to cover it. Yes, thank you the FBI and the
Speaker 1: Department of Plans. Yes, it is shameful. Enough is enough? Right?
Speaker 1: At what point is it too clear? Is it too
Speaker 1: obvious that they don't care what he says? It doesn't
Speaker 1: matter how many times the President comes out and tells everybody,
Speaker 1: of course I denounced why it's oh my gosh, it's exhausting.
Speaker 1: But they're crazy, They're deranged. That's the problem. They have
Speaker 1: Trump derangement syndrome. It's not just a clever name. It
Speaker 1: refers to something, It refers to a state of mind,
Speaker 1: to a situation. And they simply do not do not
Speaker 1: want to let this go. They don't want to let
Speaker 1: it go, and so they continue to hammer the president.
Speaker 1: It's it's embarrassing for the media, but they have no
Speaker 1: integrity to protect. I'm glad Cayley is finally just because
Speaker 1: then the news story is White House, you know, finally
Speaker 1: denounces white supremacy. You know, they denounced it a ton
Speaker 1: of times already. My god, I mean, white supremacy is
Speaker 1: a hated thing in America. White supremacy is denounced, it
Speaker 1: is despised. You will suffer severe professional and personal consequences
Speaker 1: for your support of it if you actually are a
Speaker 1: real white supremacist, right, I mean, so this is all
Speaker 1: just it's just nonsense. This this make believe problem that
Speaker 1: as a president who is a white supremacist, who won't
Speaker 1: won't denounce it, but they look look what they do.
Speaker 1: They force it forces people to be on defense. But
Speaker 1: this is just like the way the libs call everybody
Speaker 1: they don't like a racist. You're a racist. I'll prove
Speaker 1: you're not. Now, you can't, right, you're a racist. Prove
Speaker 1: you're not. You know, Oh, you're a racist. You know
Speaker 1: do you probably don't even have you know, they'll say
Speaker 1: to you, probably don't even have any black friends. You say, actually,
Speaker 1: my best friend is black. Oh, so you have a
Speaker 1: friend like that proves you're not a racist. You can't
Speaker 1: win no matter. What doesn't matter, doesn't matter, they don't care.
Speaker 1: It's just all a way of expressing their rage and
Speaker 1: disdain and everything else about it. Oh, we just we
Speaker 1: just want to get it on the record, which we
Speaker 1: just wanted to be on the record. It's on the
Speaker 1: record a million times. It's ridiculous and we're all sick
Speaker 1: of it. But unfortunately, there're gonna be more of this
Speaker 1: next week. I think there'll be there'll be some revelation
Speaker 1: about Russia, you know, Russian interference in the election, and
Speaker 1: then they'll start talking again about Trump refuses to confront
Speaker 1: Putin as if people living in suburban Ohio are supposed
Speaker 1: to be up late at night wondering about what the
Speaker 1: president is doing to upset Vladimir Putin. Putin is not
Speaker 1: a threat to you, folks. Putin is not, you know,
Speaker 1: gonna You're not invading, He's not gonna crash the US
Speaker 1: stock market, He's not. What is this the country that
Speaker 1: we need to be concern about that has tremendous influence here,
Speaker 1: that is silencing US industry and silencing the conversation in
Speaker 1: this country in ways that suits its totalitarian regime is China.
Speaker 1: Who wants to confront China? Donald Trump? They always say
Speaker 1: he's such a friend to authoritarians. Really, because the only
Speaker 1: authoritarian regime that's a real, long term strategic threat to
Speaker 1: the United States is the one that Donald Trump was
Speaker 1: willing to do things that no president before him with
Speaker 1: them in the modern history of China or the post
Speaker 1: World War two history of China, no president before him
Speaker 1: has been willing to do. And yet they act like
Speaker 1: he's such a friend to dictators. It's amaze. Look, I
Speaker 1: do I wish the president had taken a different approach
Speaker 1: with Kim Jong un. Yeah, but as a problem is
Speaker 1: just not going to get fixed. We're not going to
Speaker 1: fix that problem. The next administration is not going to
Speaker 1: fix it. The administration after that's not going to fix
Speaker 1: it in North Korea is an anomaly in the world,
Speaker 1: and at some point it will hopefully just start to
Speaker 1: change and turn into something else. But no administration has
Speaker 1: had any success in changing that situation. And you know,
Speaker 1: Trump thought he would take a different approach. Maybe he
Speaker 1: was wrong. Fine, but this is where we are, all right,
Speaker 1: this is the situation in which we find ourselves. Now,
Speaker 1: I'm just I'm so sick of all the bs, I
Speaker 1: really am, all the bs around this. Can we have
Speaker 1: a conversation about what's going to be better for people
Speaker 1: that are trying to, you know, run a small business.
Speaker 1: Can we have a conversation about changing college and and
Speaker 1: our whole system so that people aren't going deep into
Speaker 1: debt to do that, not not to have the government
Speaker 1: right checks for at all? Should we even be going
Speaker 1: to school for four years? All? No, Instead, it's let's
Speaker 1: let's have a week long chat about whether Trump is
Speaker 1: a racist for the millionth time, when he's not a
Speaker 1: racist and the people saying so are just liars. Thanks
Speaker 1: for listening to the show past. Remember to subscribe on
Speaker 1: Apple Podcasts, the iHeart Radio app four, wherever you get
Speaker 1: your podcasts. All right, Team Buck, our buddy David Harsani
Speaker 1: is with us now. He is a senior writer over
Speaker 1: at National Review. You can check out his latest at
Speaker 1: National Review dot com. David, good to have you back, sir.
Speaker 1: Always good to be here, Thank you, Buck. So what
Speaker 1: do we know about Joe Biden now that perhaps we
Speaker 1: didn't know before the debate? Or what do we know
Speaker 1: about him in general? David, I think it's an interesting
Speaker 1: question to really ask and dive into. Well, we know
Speaker 1: very little about the new Joe Biden because he's basically
Speaker 1: put a lid on the past. He doesn't really support
Speaker 1: any of the major bills or policies he's supported for
Speaker 1: thirty seven years in the Senate or whatever it was,
Speaker 1: or even really you know, at when he was in
Speaker 1: the Obama administration. I think almost every position he has
Speaker 1: a state to the left as far as positions are
Speaker 1: staked at all, because he has this weird thing where
Speaker 1: he concurrently has two positions. So he'll be on the
Speaker 1: on the debate stage and say, oh, I don't support
Speaker 1: the Green New Deal, and then on his his campaign
Speaker 1: page it says that his environmental policy will is framed
Speaker 1: around that the Green New Deal. So we don't know anything,
Speaker 1: and no one really seems to mean. I know more
Speaker 1: about the Proud Boys than I know about Biden's foreign policy.
Speaker 1: And I'm amazed because Biden, it's all just slogans and
Speaker 1: boilerplate from this guy talking points. And I really mean that.
Speaker 1: I know it's it's an easy thing to say about
Speaker 1: a politician, Oh it's all just talking points. But with
Speaker 1: Trump it's actually not. I mean, he says things that
Speaker 1: he just sort of lets it fly and lets it rip,
Speaker 1: for better or for worse. With Joe Biden, it seemed
Speaker 1: to me very apparent that he's just trying to to,
Speaker 1: you know, keep keep this sort of low and slow
Speaker 1: profile until and he's trying to run for presidents. So
Speaker 1: there's a real dissonance here. It's it's weird he calls
Speaker 1: the lids on the campaign on many days he's not
Speaker 1: doing all he's not doing a lot of interviews, not
Speaker 1: doing a lot of speeches. It's all so scripted in phone,
Speaker 1: and I just want to I wonder if if enough
Speaker 1: Americans can see through this, because I think it's obvious.
Speaker 1: I think that it's obviously I would say I just
Speaker 1: will quickly go back to something you said, I don't think.
Speaker 1: Of course, there are platitudes, and all politicians use platitudes,
Speaker 1: but this is more than the usual talk because there's
Speaker 1: he literally doesn't take a position. For instance, you know,
Speaker 1: Chuck Schumer, not some fringe activists, is threatening to pack
Speaker 1: the courts and undermine the integrity of the constitutional order,
Speaker 1: and he just won't answer a question about it. He's
Speaker 1: decided that that's not an important question for him to answering.
Speaker 1: The press sort of presses him a little bit, but
Speaker 1: then they move on. So that in itself is amazing
Speaker 1: and unprecedented in modern history. I can't think of another
Speaker 1: important issue like that. We're president. I mean, David, you know,
Speaker 1: you look at the way that they push on the
Speaker 1: have you denounced white supremacists? And then you you hear
Speaker 1: the way that they're like, I mean, the Supreme Court
Speaker 1: pack and think any thoughts on that? Oh no, okay, good,
Speaker 1: see you later. It's it's so obvious. Yeah. What they're
Speaker 1: trying to do, of course, is give Donald Trump ownership
Speaker 1: of that issue by constantly asking him this question. And
Speaker 1: obviously when someone asks you, do you condemn someone terrible?
Speaker 1: It makes you feel like they're part of your group
Speaker 1: or something, and that you know you're condemning them only
Speaker 1: because you know they're a part of you, which they're not.
Speaker 1: And Trump has condemned them numerous times. And yet at
Speaker 1: the same time you have Joe Biden saying that Antifa,
Speaker 1: who is responsible for ninety nine percent of the looting
Speaker 1: and violent political violence that we see over the last
Speaker 1: few months, you can just say they're an idea, and
Speaker 1: everyone moves forward like it's nothing, and Trump is on
Speaker 1: the cover of every single newspaper. It's so frustrating to
Speaker 1: have to deal with this, and I'm not sure how to.
Speaker 1: You know, obviously there are there are conservative media people
Speaker 1: we're speaking now, but I mean, the majors have a
Speaker 1: huge monopoly on what people see and read, and they're
Speaker 1: just not getting the full truth. And it's it's it's
Speaker 1: really dangerous for the health of the Republican thing. Chris
Speaker 1: Wallace played into this a little bit, asked about it.
Speaker 1: I just you know, I think you're a guy, David
Speaker 1: who plays it fair. You criticize the president when he
Speaker 1: deserves it, and you praise him when he deserves it
Speaker 1: in your view, and you're willing to say that stuff.
Speaker 1: And I don't think you're unfair about fellow journals. I
Speaker 1: just how could Chris Wallace not understand that asking the
Speaker 1: president to denounce white supremacists. I mean, this is like
Speaker 1: something I would expect if Trump went on Rachel Maddow show,
Speaker 1: that's the question he would get. Yeah, it was a
Speaker 1: bad question. And I generally like him because I think
Speaker 1: he plays Devil's advocate when he's interviewing people and tries
Speaker 1: to play it fair. But I don't think he's a
Speaker 1: good debate moderator because there were at least four questions
Speaker 1: and I can't remember them all now where he framed
Speaker 1: the question itself. He begged of the question. He framed
Speaker 1: it as in the leftist rhetoric, right, like calling critical
Speaker 1: race theory social racial sensitivity trading. Yeah, that is the debate, right,
Speaker 1: The debate is the question, and then Trump is left
Speaker 1: to deal with that. But he's just doing Biden's work,
Speaker 1: and there were no questions like that to Biden. I
Speaker 1: don't think so. But that's been going on forever in debates.
Speaker 1: You know, you have that Candy Crowley moment. You can
Speaker 1: go back forever. Let's be honest, It's always been that
Speaker 1: way and we just I just think conservatives have to
Speaker 1: stop letting the other side frame the debate because that
Speaker 1: is half the battle, and they're constantly doing it. At
Speaker 1: Chris Wallace, I think did that in this debate. I mean,
Speaker 1: I don't watch cable news enough to know how he
Speaker 1: is every day, but generally I thought of him as fair.
Speaker 1: But it was a bad Yeah, well, there's there's really
Speaker 1: no debates anymore on cable news. It's interesting that I
Speaker 1: feel like it was a business built on the Hannity
Speaker 1: and Combs model, or the Crossfire model, you know, these
Speaker 1: shows where there was this left right exchange that's gone now.
Speaker 1: I mean, if you're going on CNN to be a
Speaker 1: conservative these days, if you're if you're paid by them,
Speaker 1: you are there to get punched in the face and
Speaker 1: look like a fool for the amusement of CNN's audience.
Speaker 1: Same I mean an MSNBC, you're actually a conservative, like
Speaker 1: Nicole Wallace is. We are a puppet on the left
Speaker 1: doing what Democrats want you to do. But it's more
Speaker 1: fun to watch because oh, even this Republican hates Trump
Speaker 1: so much, right, it's like the never Trump or phenomenon
Speaker 1: over there um. But but with our media as it is,
Speaker 1: I have to wonder do they expect that we all
Speaker 1: forget David That no one really thought at the beginning
Speaker 1: of this process, of the of the twenty twenty election,
Speaker 1: the Democrat primary, that Joe Biden was some great candidate
Speaker 1: or no one thought this. I mean there was like
Speaker 1: not a person alive who was like, oh, Joe Biden,
Speaker 1: he's this guy's amazing, and we're left with this. This
Speaker 1: just decades long also ran and it is a part
Speaker 1: of this. I mean my thinking is that the Democrats
Speaker 1: wanted to see if they can get this done that
Speaker 1: that it's almost like part of the joke is haha, See,
Speaker 1: we could even get Joe Biden to be president instead
Speaker 1: of Trump. I don't know. Yeah, I mean I'm writing
Speaker 1: this now, but I think Joe Biden is the idea, right,
Speaker 1: He's the idea. He's not real. He's just an empty
Speaker 1: vessel that you fill in with anything you want, far
Speaker 1: left stuff or moderate. You pretend he's a moderate, but
Speaker 1: he's really nothing. He's just to stand in. It's a
Speaker 1: terrible thing to say about someone, but as a political matter,
Speaker 1: he's just to stand in because he was the most
Speaker 1: palatable candidate available for them who wasn't crazy, who they
Speaker 1: thought could win the election. And because he doesn't stand
Speaker 1: for anything, he is just he doesn't stand for what
Speaker 1: he used to believe in. He's just. Look, they're saying, Joe,
Speaker 1: Joe is moral, and you know Trump isn't moral, and
Speaker 1: you have to pick the right guy. Well, yeah, that
Speaker 1: might be part of the equation if you don't believe
Speaker 1: Trump is a moral guy. But you know what, I
Speaker 1: don't think late term abortions moral either, So I have
Speaker 1: a you know, that makes me think about a lot
Speaker 1: of other things as well. But we never talk about
Speaker 1: policy anymore. And you mentioned the debates cross debating on
Speaker 1: cable TV. I grew up watching Crossfire with Pat Buchanan
Speaker 1: on it and others, and I love that show and
Speaker 1: it made me interested in politics. But we don't have
Speaker 1: that kind of debate going on anymore. We don't have
Speaker 1: it on Twitter either. It's just like fly by and
Speaker 1: another fly by and you're a loser and you're stupid
Speaker 1: and you love Trump, blah blah blah. Never any kind
Speaker 1: of real debate anymore. And there used to be when
Speaker 1: I first got on Twitter. I think and the blogging
Speaker 1: world used to be debate, but there's no debate anymore,
Speaker 1: and everyone lives in their bubble. Yeah, it's just become
Speaker 1: completely it's become completely ossified. Or speaking of David Arsani
Speaker 1: of National Review, everyone and you know, David, there's been
Speaker 1: this talk now about changing the debate format going forward.
Speaker 1: Do you think does this even really matter at this point?
Speaker 1: I feel like by next week, no one's really going
Speaker 1: to even remember the first debate. So why this fixation?
Speaker 1: I guess in the media gives us something to do.
Speaker 1: You know, if you have seventy million people watching something,
Speaker 1: I think it matters, right, will we remember it? Probably not?
Speaker 1: There only moments to do. But it's it's sort of
Speaker 1: compounding interest where you have all these events happening and
Speaker 1: they create a perception of people. I think most of
Speaker 1: that's baked into the cake with Trump, but it might
Speaker 1: not be so with Biden. Fully, I like debates. I
Speaker 1: don't like debate structures like this. I think it's antiquated.
Speaker 1: I think you have to have more open discussion, not
Speaker 1: less fewer rules, not more of the idea that you're
Speaker 1: going to cut off microphones as ridiculous. If Trump wants
Speaker 1: to be aggressive, let him be aggressive and if people
Speaker 1: don't like it, they won't vote for him. It's part
Speaker 1: of who he is. I wrote a column, you know
Speaker 1: the other day, I think just let them fight, let
Speaker 1: them fight, let's see what happens. So many times they
Speaker 1: were interesting conversation accidentally start to get interesting and Chris
Speaker 1: Wallace is jumping in to say that the time is up,
Speaker 1: like we're like their children. That that was my That
Speaker 1: was my big complaint was that they needed you know,
Speaker 1: I know, I know ever likes to rip on soccer,
Speaker 1: but you know, soccer has the they call it the
Speaker 1: advantage rule where if someone foul someone but then another
Speaker 1: teammate that of the guy that got foul, like about
Speaker 1: to score maybe or it has a breakaway, they let
Speaker 1: the play continue and then they'll go back and deal
Speaker 1: with the foul if they have to penalize somebody afterwards.
Speaker 1: That's got to be a little more the approach in
Speaker 1: the debate, and it was amazing. It was almost like
Speaker 1: that they were trying to at every point where it's
Speaker 1: seemed like there was going to be something that you
Speaker 1: heard that was meaningful from one of the candidates. Chris
Speaker 1: Wallace jumped in and started interrupting and being a pain
Speaker 1: in the ass. I mean that was what actually happened. Yeah,
Speaker 1: a colleague of mine pointed out, and I think it's
Speaker 1: interesting that when you read the transcript, Trump is far
Speaker 1: more on, talks far more about policy, talks far more
Speaker 1: about specifics, and comes off far better than he did
Speaker 1: in the video and the way he was. But yeah,
Speaker 1: it's funny that you mentioned soccer, because the ray are
Speaker 1: a few times I do watch soccer at the end
Speaker 1: of the game, like the clock's up, but they're still playing,
Speaker 1: and I'm like, what the hell is going on? But
Speaker 1: it is. It is definitely a good idea to let
Speaker 1: to not have a debate in the constraints of twentieth
Speaker 1: century television. Right we don't have a commercial coming, we
Speaker 1: have YouTube, we have c Span, we can watch this anywhere.
Speaker 1: It doesn't make any sense to me why it has
Speaker 1: to be. There has to be be these time limits.
Speaker 1: And I think they help Biden now, but in the
Speaker 1: future it might help someone else. I think we just
Speaker 1: have to change the way we look at that. We
Speaker 1: look at debates and what they're meant to do. They're
Speaker 1: meant to inform, not to be part of some you
Speaker 1: know strict. You know, we must answer all these questions today.
Speaker 1: You can have as many debates as you want day before.
Speaker 1: Let you go. If Biden wins, let's just say you're
Speaker 1: not You're not a catastrophist. I mean, you're a pretty
Speaker 1: even kieled guy. How bad is it for the country
Speaker 1: in your estimation? See keep saying I'm even kiel I
Speaker 1: don't know. Um depends if the Republicans keep the Senate.
Speaker 1: I think Biden is a pushover for anything that's going on.
Speaker 1: I don't feel like he's going to stand up to
Speaker 1: the left. Maybe will, but I doubt it. I think
Speaker 1: if the Republicans lose the Senate also depends how much
Speaker 1: they lose it. It It could be very bad if they
Speaker 1: look if it's if they're up, you know, by one
Speaker 1: or two seats in the Senate. I don't think they're
Speaker 1: going to get rid of the fiddle of us or
Speaker 1: I don't think they're going to pack the courts. I won't.
Speaker 1: I just think that a lot of the people who
Speaker 1: are coming into the Senate then, and a lot of
Speaker 1: the more moderate states West Virginia, maybe Arizona and places
Speaker 1: like that, are not going to want to ruin their
Speaker 1: career years moving forward by being radical. But if they win,
Speaker 1: you know, three four seats, if they go three four
Speaker 1: seats up and buy and wins and they have the House,
Speaker 1: I don't think it's going to be very good, very
Speaker 1: good for people who believe in conservative policies. We'll see,
Speaker 1: but I don't you know, and I don't find not
Speaker 1: gonna be a two term president most likely. So you're
Speaker 1: going to have the party that's behind him, and you
Speaker 1: see the sorts of folks who are there leading the
Speaker 1: charge and making policy. That's that's pretty scary, I think
Speaker 1: if you you know, if you're a conservative. David Harsani
Speaker 1: everyone check out his latest at National Review dot com.
Speaker 1: Also follow him on Twitter if you're on Twitter at
Speaker 1: David Harsani. David. Great to see you, man, Take care,
Speaker 1: Thank you bye. You're in the Freedom Hunt. This is
Speaker 1: the Buck Sex and Show podcast. You're gonna go with
Speaker 1: that weak ass argument here bird who had a complete
Speaker 1: enlightenment about how hate was wrong, who changed his life,
Speaker 1: who spoke about it. Chris just eulogized to Klansman. Also
Speaker 1: give you another example, nod, that's your example. You're gonna
Speaker 1: give you another one. A lot of hold on because
Speaker 1: I don't want you to run away from the premise. Senator,
Speaker 1: I'm not you, but I'm not a fool either. He
Speaker 1: did it in Charlottesville. He did it with David Duke,
Speaker 1: the old Ted Cruise who he called lyon Ted when
Speaker 1: he wasn't insulting your wife and your father tweeted, Hey,
Speaker 1: you're better than this, mister president. What happened to that, Ted?
Speaker 1: I don't know if he changed or did just you
Speaker 1: change for some reason. Senator Chris, you know I'm glad
Speaker 1: you take tips on insults from from from other folks. Really,
Speaker 1: am I insulting you, sir? Oh yeah, so yeah you are,
Speaker 1: and you're enjoying it. That's I'm not enjoying it at all, Chris.
Speaker 1: I'm not enjoying anything about her except having an opportunity
Speaker 1: for you to say the right thing at the right time. Chris,
Speaker 1: there was a time when CNN actually cared about being
Speaker 1: journalistic and talking about facts. Donald Trump broke you, guys.
Speaker 1: I mean, you're just your entire show, your entire network
Speaker 1: now is just how much you hate Trump. And yes,
Speaker 1: really yes, Ted Cruz is speaking the truth here, That's correct.
Speaker 1: CNN is a network devoted to Trump hatreod It's bizarre,
Speaker 1: it's sad, it's really uncomfortable, and to the country. It
Speaker 1: really could be dangerous too. We are at this very
Speaker 1: divided point in time and to have entire networks that
Speaker 1: all they just do is convince everyone all the time
Speaker 1: how horrible and racist and evil the president is. You know,
Speaker 1: I remember the opposition to Obama at Fox News. I
Speaker 1: did a lot of Fox at the time. How was
Speaker 1: working at The Blaze, which Glenbeck started, and you remember
Speaker 1: Glenn at that time had had a tremendous national voice.
Speaker 1: The conversation in two eleven twenty twelve, and it was
Speaker 1: always we don't like what Obama is doing. Yes, there
Speaker 1: were people that said, you know, other things, and there
Speaker 1: was you know, there there were people that that hated
Speaker 1: Obama or thought he was you know, he was that
Speaker 1: people talk about him being a secret Muslim and all
Speaker 1: this stuff. I understand that that existed, But the mainstream
Speaker 1: conversation in conservative circles and on the right and the
Speaker 1: Republican Party was we don't like this thing that Obama
Speaker 1: is doing as president. Right, it wasn't always always Obama's
Speaker 1: the worst person. He's an awful evil, he's you know,
Speaker 1: horrible to his family. He's a he's a the thing.
Speaker 1: Look the things they call Trump a trader, a rapist, crazy.
Speaker 1: No one said these things about Obama. And they say, oh,
Speaker 1: well that's because Obama wasn't those things. Yeah, Trump isn't either. No,
Speaker 1: we didn't like Obama care. We didn't like the bowing
Speaker 1: to foreign countries and apologizing for America at a time
Speaker 1: when we were under assault from a lot of gehattest terrorism.
Speaker 1: We didn't like things that he was doing. We wanted
Speaker 1: to do other things. You know, when Obama took credit
Speaker 1: for the bin Laden raid and making that call, people
Speaker 1: were saying, okay, you know, get the guy credited helped
Speaker 1: him get reelected. Right, there were something Obama aministration did
Speaker 1: where I don't care who you are, you have to say, okay,
Speaker 1: well that was the right move. But it wasn't about
Speaker 1: hating ob I don't hate Barack Obama. I don't know
Speaker 1: Barack obam. I don't hate him. These people at CNN
Speaker 1: they hate Donald Trump. I mean, it's Jeff Zucker. It's known,
Speaker 1: it is deeply personal for him, you know. And look,
Speaker 1: I mean there are people in the media that I
Speaker 1: know on a at some personal level, or have had
Speaker 1: interactions with that I think are horrible, And if they
Speaker 1: were running for office, it would be very hard for
Speaker 1: me to ever be objective because I think that person sucks.
Speaker 1: But I'm I would be honest with you about that.
Speaker 1: The news media is not honest about any of this,
Speaker 1: and they're also not honest about what's about to happen
Speaker 1: in this country where we're gonna see blue states, New
Speaker 1: York most notably, are gonna shut down again, and we're
Speaker 1: gonna be told to wear masks. And I want to
Speaker 1: know right now what the answers can be to questions like, so,
Speaker 1: when the vaccine comes out, if I get the vaccine,
Speaker 1: am I still supposed to wear a mask after I
Speaker 1: get the vaccine? If I get a vaccine, do I
Speaker 1: still have to wear a mask? Now I'm supposed to
Speaker 1: be vaccinated against it, but I'm gonna wear a mask
Speaker 1: anyway to make people feel better. We're gonna have businesses
Speaker 1: shut down going into the election. You're gonna have New
Speaker 1: York City still in this, you know, And and Biden
Speaker 1: saying this is gonna be a national mask mandate. All
Speaker 1: this stuff that's happening, and we're not going to hold
Speaker 1: anybody accountable for all these excesses, are we or not?
Speaker 1: I mean Governor Cuomo. We just had Chris Cuomo before
Speaker 1: he gets very testy about this. Governor Cuomo has now
Speaker 1: been saying that he never sent COVID positive patients in
Speaker 1: nursing homes. Just just Stalin's style, polite borrow, rewriting of
Speaker 1: history to suit the purposes of the people in power
Speaker 1: at the moment. That's what's actually happening, that is going
Speaker 1: on right now. You know, Chris, I mean not Chris,
Speaker 1: you know Governor Cuomo, Andrew Momo. It's amazing these guys
Speaker 1: all because of their last name because daddy was a governor,
Speaker 1: now they get to be governor and TV hosts. Really astonishing.
Speaker 1: Nepotism is one of the it's it's a bad thing
Speaker 1: in this country. And it's on both sides. I know
Speaker 1: we're all supposed to just say, you know, mmm, we
Speaker 1: want a meritocracy, and nepotism is not a meritocracy, folks. Um,
Speaker 1: But I digress. Anyway, The problem with Chris Quomo, guys
Speaker 1: keep saying Andrew Cuomo, he's he's now saying that he
Speaker 1: sleeps well at night, you know, his head sleeps soundly
Speaker 1: on the pillow because he saved so many lives in
Speaker 1: New York. This guy did the worst job of anyone
Speaker 1: in the world in response to the COVID pandemic, and
Speaker 1: his claim is that he saved lives. With all of this,
Speaker 1: I mean, we're just arguing with another with the other
Speaker 1: side here on things where they reject objective reality. They
Speaker 1: reject what's really clear and what's happening. How do you
Speaker 1: win a debate with people who are just gonna pretend
Speaker 1: things aren't what they are. I don't know. I don't know,
Speaker 1: and that's what people ask me. How do we win
Speaker 1: with its other side? I think you just you gotta
Speaker 1: keep fighting. You've just got to take that Trump approach
Speaker 1: of never give in, never step back, never apologize, stay
Speaker 1: in the fight. Thanks for listening to The Bus Sesson
Speaker 1: Show podcast. Remember to subscribe on Apple Podcast, the iHeart
Speaker 1: Radio app, or wherever you get your podcasts. Hey, team Buck,
Speaker 1: it's time for roll call. You know, I finished The
Speaker 1: Last Kingdom last night, the most recent season. I finished
Speaker 1: last episode. I mean, it's a good show. It's a
Speaker 1: good show for what it is. I think that it
Speaker 1: sometimes goes a little it gets a little repetitive. It's
Speaker 1: kind of the same thing, you know, the Vikings took
Speaker 1: another city. Oh, we have to take it back, you
Speaker 1: know that. I wish the writing was a little bit
Speaker 1: a little bit better sometimes, but overall, I think it's
Speaker 1: just pretty pretty good, enjoyable show. And I got Bosh,
Speaker 1: But after that, I'm done with Cobra Kai i am.
Speaker 1: I'm almost done with with the episodes of Bosh that exist.
Speaker 1: So I gotta find a new show man. It's always hard,
Speaker 1: Bruce Mark, you got any other than the Creek? You
Speaker 1: got any suggestions? Not off the top of my head. No,
Speaker 1: some old shows you could probably watch. I don't watch
Speaker 1: anything new. I don't know why what old shows really
Speaker 1: hold up? Well. Seinfeld's always there, obviously. Have you ever
Speaker 1: watched Scrubs? Um? No, I have not. Honestly, one of
Speaker 1: the best shows, one of my personal favorite shows ever. Really. Uh,
Speaker 1: you know Murray from Clueless is in it from Scrubs.
Speaker 1: He is in Scrubs. I didn't know that. Yeah, and
Speaker 1: he is best known for I'm keeping it real. I
Speaker 1: never watched Clueless. I probably did a long time ago,
Speaker 1: but I don't everyone producer Mark, everyone has seen Clue.
Speaker 1: I'm sure I've seen it, but I don't remember. I
Speaker 1: don't have the recall like you do. M Yeah, keep it.
Speaker 1: And in fact, Dion from Clueless had a career at
Speaker 1: Fox News for a little while. Did you know that.
Speaker 1: Yeahon from Clueless. She's a very attractive African American lady.
Speaker 1: Um and yeah she was. She was Fox News. I
Speaker 1: don't know correspondent host, but she was on on air
Speaker 1: a Fox a fair amount for a while. So anyway, Ah, yes, Cluiss, great,
Speaker 1: great film, great film. I got to find some stuff
Speaker 1: to watch here. I've also got to stop playing Call
Speaker 1: of Duty because it's so addictive, and you know, you
Speaker 1: get a little bit better at it, and then it's
Speaker 1: have you ever played I have? It's very fun. I
Speaker 1: don't get addicted to it because I'm so bad at it. Well,
Speaker 1: that's the problem is once you start to I think
Speaker 1: it's a little bit like people have explained golf this
Speaker 1: way to me, that golf is terrible until you stop
Speaker 1: being terrible at it, and then it's amazing and then
Speaker 1: you just want to do it all the time. Yeah.
Speaker 1: I said that to my wife recently. It was like
Speaker 1: if we moved to Florida, like I have to play golf, right, Like,
Speaker 1: there's what else do you do if you live in Florida?
Speaker 1: I think I think you do? What'd she say? She said?
Speaker 1: I mean whatever you want to do. If she doesn't care,
Speaker 1: that's nice, that's nice. Are you a pool or a
Speaker 1: beach guy? Pool? Poor? For sure? Yeah, the beach is
Speaker 1: just granted. When I lived at a beach, so I
Speaker 1: used to live in Long Beach, New York, and I
Speaker 1: could walk there. It was great. But any other time,
Speaker 1: if you have to drive there or take public transportation
Speaker 1: or whatever and slep all your stuff, it's a big pain.
Speaker 1: There we have it. Well, we'll say I'll to find
Speaker 1: a new shaw. Let's you know, if I come up
Speaker 1: on anything good. Remember if you want to send us
Speaker 1: your thoughts, Team Bucket iHeartMedia dot com or on Facebook
Speaker 1: just go to Facebook dot com slash buck Sexton and
Speaker 1: on Instagram. We like getting Instagram stuff. Instagram. Just send
Speaker 1: a note to Buck Sexton producer Mark will go through it.
Speaker 1: If you get a Team buck or a Shield's high tattoo,
Speaker 1: by all means and that in we love. We love
Speaker 1: that kind of stuff. That was one of my favorite
Speaker 1: messages in a while. That was great. I feel like
Speaker 1: we'd have to get you a raise though, for you
Speaker 1: to get a team buck tattoo. Oh a huge one,
Speaker 1: big race, big race. Yeah, I think I would need
Speaker 1: a race too. I'm not I don't know needles. I'm
Speaker 1: not a needles guy. Can't really endle that. That wouldn't
Speaker 1: be bad if anyone really a needle person. I think
Speaker 1: some people, and I know that they're people who are
Speaker 1: really really into getting a lot of tattoos. So I
Speaker 1: don't know if they're a needle person, but it clearly
Speaker 1: doesn't bother them that much. Well. You see, when I
Speaker 1: think of needles, I think like getting an ivy or
Speaker 1: getting a shot or something. Yeah, at the doctor's office,
Speaker 1: I gotta get a pertussis shot for whooping cough. Because
Speaker 1: my little sister's about to have a baby. Congratulations. Yeah,
Speaker 1: she's like she's like two three weeks away. Baby's gonna
Speaker 1: come flying out. He's gonna have a mane of hair.
Speaker 1: He's gonna be a very loquacious right away. That's what
Speaker 1: I think, at least. I mean, he's not your baby,
Speaker 1: but he's related to me, so it's gonna be like
Speaker 1: kind of like baby Stewie. Does your brother in law
Speaker 1: have good hair? Oh? Yes, good hair? All right, man
Speaker 1: has good hair. So we're in good shape there, all right, Tyler, Oh, Tyler,
Speaker 1: this is from Yes. We wanted to get this yesterday
Speaker 1: and I said I would, but the show actually came
Speaker 1: to a close, and now we will give your question.
Speaker 1: It's full du Hey, Buck, you're doing amazing work. Got
Speaker 1: your new book in the mail. I'm excited to read it.
Speaker 1: That's right, Buck Sexton book dot com. People go get
Speaker 1: a copy The Socialism Survival got an eight radical predictions
Speaker 1: that'll come true after the next election. I actually wrote it.
Speaker 1: I'm like a lot of conservatives that put out books
Speaker 1: that other people wrote but that they put their name on.
Speaker 1: That's just not my thing. If I say I wrote it,
Speaker 1: I wrote it. Now. There are some addendums to the
Speaker 1: chapters that are from my friends at Stansbury research on
Speaker 1: things you can do based on the predictions to take
Speaker 1: economic action or you know, financial action to help yourself prepare.
Speaker 1: But that's very clear. But all the actual stuff on
Speaker 1: the socialism and the election and the predictions that who's
Speaker 1: gonna win the election for example, what happens afterwards? What
Speaker 1: are the Democrats going to do if they win? All
Speaker 1: this is in the book Buck Sexton book dot com.
Speaker 1: Please pick up your copy today. And Okay, Tyler, right,
Speaker 1: So my question for you is about the Democratic Party
Speaker 1: selecting Biden, because, like so many others, I'm still baffled
Speaker 1: when you talk about him being the nominee. You say
Speaker 1: the DNC democratic machine selected him and rejected everyone else,
Speaker 1: including Bernie. I know the DNC and the media are
Speaker 1: hugely influential to their voter base, but the voters still
Speaker 1: say Biden was their best shot. It seems like the
Speaker 1: voters picked him in spite of the DNC media putting
Speaker 1: the spotlight on others like Harris. But somehow Biden got
Speaker 1: the votes anyway, and then the DNC had to line
Speaker 1: up behind him. So how intact do you think the
Speaker 1: Democratic electoral process still is today? Also? I noticed that
Speaker 1: your boy Jesse Kelly recently did a podcast on the
Speaker 1: siege of Malta. Just throwing that out there, shields high
Speaker 1: what he did? Yes, I checked, he did. That's what
Speaker 1: happens when procrastinated for six months. Wow. Okay, hmm, good
Speaker 1: for Jesse, very nice. Um, all righty here, what else
Speaker 1: do we have here? I'm sure it's great. I'll actually
Speaker 1: I'll give it a listen. As for your Biden Democratic
Speaker 1: Party situation here, uh yeah, I think you Look, I
Speaker 1: think that um, you know, the DNC is very powerful
Speaker 1: the voters. Here. Here's what happened with Biden. Okay, Biden
Speaker 1: has the black vote behind him. He did in the primary,
Speaker 1: and some of the other favored media candidates could not
Speaker 1: get that level of support from the Black community and
Speaker 1: that was essential to winning the primary. And it's just look,
Speaker 1: Biden was a part of the Obama administration a lot
Speaker 1: of African American support, so you know that, Yeah, that
Speaker 1: was a big factor in all this. Like to judge,
Speaker 1: media loved him. Couldn't get Black support in the primary
Speaker 1: at all. I mean, it was like basically zero. Kamala
Speaker 1: Harris could not get support of African American primary voters.
Speaker 1: So that was a big advantage that Biden had going
Speaker 1: through the whole way. But then also the people who
Speaker 1: in the media and behind the scenes are the power
Speaker 1: brokers in the Democrat Party. I think that they recognize
Speaker 1: that it would be harder to push through it would
Speaker 1: be harder to push through a Bernie Sanders candidacy, and
Speaker 1: so they just wanted to go with this concept of electability. Now,
Speaker 1: electability is kind of funny because it is what the
Speaker 1: people say it is who want to make an election happen, right,
Speaker 1: So that's interesting, you know, electability. Hillary was supposed to
Speaker 1: be the electable one, but she wasn't. So that's what
Speaker 1: I'm saying, that they'd be able to make these decisions.
Speaker 1: It's supposed to be a self fulfilling prophecy, and it
Speaker 1: often is not, So that's what I would say. That's
Speaker 1: what I say, JR. I love your show. I binge
Speaker 1: listened to you and Bongino on the weekends. Well, JR.
Speaker 1: I'm in an elite company there. Thank you very much.
Speaker 1: I enjoy You're levelheaded and seldom hyperbolic observations and commentary.
Speaker 1: I'm always amused at the hyperbole Biden and the Democrats
Speaker 1: used to claim Trump and Republicans want you unilaterally destroy
Speaker 1: the Unaffordable Care Act. Most Americans recall the Unaffordable Care
Speaker 1: Act was written in secret and passed against the wishes
Speaker 1: of most of Americans and without any support from real Republicans.
Speaker 1: Keep up the good work. Shield Ti phasers on stunt. Yeah,
Speaker 1: I mean, the Affordable Care Act was an act, and Jr.
Speaker 1: Thank you for your support. By the way, I appreciate
Speaker 1: your writing in The Affordable Care Act was an act
Speaker 1: of totally unilateral Democrat movement. That's it, right. The Affordable
Speaker 1: Care Act was entirely the Democrats deciding that they were
Speaker 1: going to do something, and it didn't matter that Republicans
Speaker 1: were not getting on board for or it at all.
Speaker 1: So that's and to view that as some kind of
Speaker 1: great leap well, it was kind of a great leap forward,
Speaker 1: but as some major advancement for all of us. Uh No,
Speaker 1: it made for a lot of people healthcare. Some people
Speaker 1: benefited from it, a lot of people didn't. It picked
Speaker 1: winners and losers in the individual market because you're either
Speaker 1: subsidizing others for lesser care or getting better care because
Speaker 1: of the subsidies, but someone subsidizing it, So money's coming
Speaker 1: from somewhere. And you know, the preexisting conditions issue, that's
Speaker 1: just so emotionally, that resonates so much with people emotionally.
Speaker 1: But the true prexisting conditions, it's like one percent of
Speaker 1: the market that have that have previousting conditions were insurers
Speaker 1: will just say sorry, Now, look that's a few million people,
Speaker 1: so I'm not saying that's insignificant. But everyone kind of
Speaker 1: got sold this thing of, oh, you know, there's a
Speaker 1: huge portion of the population that can't be insure. That's
Speaker 1: not true. When they when they were ramming through Obamacare
Speaker 1: without a single Republican vote, generally speaking, about seventy percent
Speaker 1: of people in the polls would in fact or its
Speaker 1: seventy percent of people believed that they liked their healthcare.
Speaker 1: It was about seventy per So that's pretty good. Now
Speaker 1: you've got a whole lot more people on Medicaid because
Speaker 1: of Obamacare, but Medicaid is not very good healthcare. And
Speaker 1: so really, what the what the left with the Democrats
Speaker 1: now have to do as part of all of this
Speaker 1: is they want to say they're going to give everybody
Speaker 1: better healthcare, but really, what's going to happen because healthcare
Speaker 1: is a finite resource. There's not endless doctors, there aren't
Speaker 1: endless you know, emergency room waiting rooms and so on
Speaker 1: and so forth. So what they want to do is
Speaker 1: spread out the healthcare resources that already exist so that
Speaker 1: you know, you'll have a lot more people who have
Speaker 1: something that's similar to Medicaid. They're gonna call it medicare.
Speaker 1: But if everyone's on Medicare, it's going to be closer
Speaker 1: to medicaid, which means a lot of doctors don't won't
Speaker 1: want to take it. A lot of things won't be covered,
Speaker 1: and you'll have long waits and specialists will take forever.
Speaker 1: And that's what we see in other countries too. I mean,
Speaker 1: this is just the way it plays out. The market
Speaker 1: is the market, even when Democrats call it something else.
Speaker 1: They can say the market is a pink hippopotamus, but
Speaker 1: it still is the market. You're in the freedom. This
Speaker 1: is the Buck Sexton Show podcast, all right, more roll
Speaker 1: called Matthew hey Box. Just want to let you know
Speaker 1: I love your show. I've always been a big Rush
Speaker 1: fan and was listening to his podcast when I saw
Speaker 1: an ad for your show. Started listening to one episode
Speaker 1: and I cannot get enough. The other day, listening to
Speaker 1: your dialogue as Putin talking to President Trump had me
Speaker 1: die and could not stop laughing. That was great. Give
Speaker 1: you up the good work. God bless you, and God
Speaker 1: bless America. Thank you, Matthew that's great, man, I really
Speaker 1: appreciate that. Anohing makes me happy that people write in
Speaker 1: and just tell me they really like the show. Ruster Mark.
Speaker 1: We just get more of those messages, please, absolutely, I'll
Speaker 1: have people start running them in. Yeah. Just you know,
Speaker 1: you know that Buck keeps him safe and warm at night,
Speaker 1: or the Freedom Huck keeps them safe and warm night.
Speaker 1: If I keep him safe warm at night, that's you know, yeah,
Speaker 1: that's a little weird, but you know what I mean.
Speaker 1: The Freedom Huck keeps him safe and warm at night,
Speaker 1: darn't it. So yeah, let's see. And I'm being a
Speaker 1: big Rush fan. If you like this show, you like Rush,
Speaker 1: you've obviously got fantastic taste in audio programming. So there
Speaker 1: you have it. Z. It's a fun name to say. Z.
Speaker 1: I like it. Hey, Buck Wile the President surely managed
Speaker 1: to reinforce the common opinion of him during the debate.
Speaker 1: Instead of using the opportunity to contrast his record with
Speaker 1: that of his predecessor and VP and grab the even
Speaker 1: greater opportunity to present himself the public without the negative
Speaker 1: filter of the mass media, he confirmed the bad press,
Speaker 1: with Biden correcting himself at least three times. Instead of
Speaker 1: repeated interjections, the President should have allowed the x VP
Speaker 1: every opportunity already to trip up by presenting his own
Speaker 1: administration's accomplishments pre COVID minority employment. To start, the president
Speaker 1: would all but force the XVP to counter his claims
Speaker 1: or stand mum, yeah, look, you know, I backed the President,
Speaker 1: and I understand why he has to go go guns
Speaker 1: blazing into these debates. And I've said that today on
Speaker 1: the show. I was frustrated though, because it felt like
Speaker 1: there were a few points where I don't know how
Speaker 1: many of your Immortal Kombat fans where Finnish him would
Speaker 1: have been the appropriate background sound, and it just he
Speaker 1: didn't get there. And it was in part because of
Speaker 1: Chris Wallace's interruptions. But you know, you've also gotta you know,
Speaker 1: it is the president on that debate stage, and I
Speaker 1: just wish he had been in in a frame of mind.
Speaker 1: I don't know what else to say. I just wish
Speaker 1: he had been in a place where he could have really,
Speaker 1: because I mean, if you pin buying down on even
Speaker 1: just the question about whether he'll pack the Supreme Court,
Speaker 1: if you get him to say yes, I would I
Speaker 1: would consider pack the Supreme Court. That's a problem. That's
Speaker 1: a problem for the whole Democrat narrative about a return
Speaker 1: to normalcy and all the norm breaking that Trump has
Speaker 1: done it. So you got to remember that that there
Speaker 1: are some areas here. It's not just something we're talking
Speaker 1: about it. It It really is true. If you were able
Speaker 1: to get Biden locked in on something and made him
Speaker 1: answer some of these questions, I think he'd have a
Speaker 1: big problem. So, yeah, it was. It was frustrating for
Speaker 1: me that that didn't happen with Trump and the debate.
Speaker 1: It was frustrating. But that said, it's not me up
Speaker 1: on that debate stage. Although I would obviously, I mean
Speaker 1: Biden would would not farewell in the Buck debate. Craig,
Speaker 1: can you please explain how he came to be a
Speaker 1: two party system? Have some lib friends that I'd like
Speaker 1: to be better able to talk to you about this. Thanks,
Speaker 1: enjoy your show. A producer, Mark is cool. You hear that?
Speaker 1: Pretty smart? Craig says, you're cool. I'm glad someone thinks
Speaker 1: I'm cool. There you go. As for the two party system,
Speaker 1: that's I wish I had like a cool thirty. Speaking
Speaker 1: of cool thirty, second explanation of it. Let me say
Speaker 1: that this is something that I will I will have
Speaker 1: to return to when I have more than about forty
Speaker 1: five seconds left on the show. But Craig, I'll follow
Speaker 1: it away. I'll follow it away, Anthony, hey buck. What
Speaker 1: was productive about the debate was that the President showed
Speaker 1: Biden what the president has put up with every day
Speaker 1: with the press for the past four years. After that,
Speaker 1: do you think the press will treat the president any better? Better? Yet,
Speaker 1: do you think Biden could handle the pressure? Come on, man,
Speaker 1: what was Do you think the press will treat president
Speaker 1: any better? No? They will not, So I can answer
Speaker 1: that part for you, Anthony. The press will not treat
Speaker 1: the president any better. They view their job as preventing
Speaker 1: him from getting elected. Understand that their job is not
Speaker 1: to present you with acts and information so that you
Speaker 1: can make a decision. Their job is to make sure
Speaker 1: and their minds is to make sure the president does
Speaker 1: not get elected. All right, everyone, that's the show today.
Speaker 1: Thank you so much for being here, and honor and
Speaker 1: a privilege as always. Until next time, get ready for friends,
Speaker 1: Shields High