WEBVTT - Surveillance: Fed's Mester Says U.S. Reopening Will Take Time

0:00:09.880 --> 0:00:13.800
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Tom Keane Jay Ley.

0:00:13.960 --> 0:00:17.560
<v Speaker 1>We bring you insight from the best in economics, finance, investment,

0:00:18.000 --> 0:00:23.520
<v Speaker 1>and international relations. Find Bloomberg Surveillance on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud,

0:00:23.640 --> 0:00:27.800
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot Com, and of course on the Bloomberg We

0:00:27.880 --> 0:00:30.080
<v Speaker 1>can catch up. A good friend of this program's Tony

0:00:30.120 --> 0:00:33.479
<v Speaker 1>da of counter coach genuitcy Tony, you've been quiet for

0:00:33.520 --> 0:00:37.879
<v Speaker 1>a solid week. Where have you been. I don't know.

0:00:37.920 --> 0:00:41.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't feel so quiet. Uh So I'm in this

0:00:41.320 --> 0:00:45.080
<v Speaker 1>funky position because we've been expecting a relief rally and

0:00:45.120 --> 0:00:47.400
<v Speaker 1>we got it right. We got a relief rally that

0:00:47.520 --> 0:00:50.880
<v Speaker 1>is historic. We've retraced about fifty of what we've lost

0:00:51.440 --> 0:00:56.280
<v Speaker 1>during the crash in March and that that really is extraordinary.

0:00:56.480 --> 0:00:59.240
<v Speaker 1>So what you know, I'm trying to figure out if

0:00:59.240 --> 0:01:03.360
<v Speaker 1>a tactical rally, meaning based on an over soul condition

0:01:03.440 --> 0:01:07.560
<v Speaker 1>of hope, uh, if that's going to become a fundamental rally,

0:01:07.720 --> 0:01:11.399
<v Speaker 1>and I'm not clear on that at this point. I

0:01:11.520 --> 0:01:15.840
<v Speaker 1>looked Tony at the equity markets and what I perceive

0:01:15.959 --> 0:01:21.800
<v Speaker 1>as a narrowness of this rally. How narrow is narrow? Well?

0:01:21.800 --> 0:01:25.200
<v Speaker 1>The last two days have seen the downside by him

0:01:25.240 --> 0:01:29.280
<v Speaker 1>significantly outweighing the upside by him. So you had you

0:01:29.400 --> 0:01:34.160
<v Speaker 1>had two really bad quote unquote market days, but megacap

0:01:34.280 --> 0:01:37.959
<v Speaker 1>Tech was leading. So the thing that's the most interesting

0:01:38.000 --> 0:01:41.520
<v Speaker 1>about that megacap Tech at this point is it's actually

0:01:42.040 --> 0:01:46.840
<v Speaker 1>considered defensive. So for those that have gone on offense, right.

0:01:46.880 --> 0:01:48.720
<v Speaker 1>We we downgraded the market, as you guys know in

0:01:48.800 --> 0:01:52.960
<v Speaker 1>January and expected once you got that panic low, which

0:01:53.000 --> 0:01:56.160
<v Speaker 1>was identifiable, we expect the relief rally, and we got it.

0:01:56.160 --> 0:01:59.160
<v Speaker 1>It's been a lot more than I thought it would be,

0:01:59.560 --> 0:02:02.680
<v Speaker 1>but the wrong groups are leading it. If you're if

0:02:02.720 --> 0:02:06.600
<v Speaker 1>you're expecting a good fundamentally driven bull market, they usually

0:02:06.600 --> 0:02:11.639
<v Speaker 1>are kicked off with small cap stocks leading, with offensive

0:02:11.720 --> 0:02:18.240
<v Speaker 1>sectors like financials, industrials, consumer discretionary, with those areas leading,

0:02:18.760 --> 0:02:23.639
<v Speaker 1>but they're lagging. So there's basically to make it very

0:02:23.680 --> 0:02:27.720
<v Speaker 1>clear for the listeners, because this sounds really complicated coming

0:02:27.720 --> 0:02:30.480
<v Speaker 1>off of a major bear market low. You want to

0:02:30.560 --> 0:02:34.080
<v Speaker 1>see the more aggressive areas do better, but that's not

0:02:34.240 --> 0:02:37.000
<v Speaker 1>been the case in the rally, and that was evidence time,

0:02:37.000 --> 0:02:39.160
<v Speaker 1>as you suggested, by the narrowness of the last couple

0:02:39.200 --> 0:02:42.120
<v Speaker 1>of days, Tony. As you talk, it strikes me that

0:02:42.160 --> 0:02:44.799
<v Speaker 1>perhaps we can look at this in another way that

0:02:44.880 --> 0:02:47.680
<v Speaker 1>when we say the stock market is rallying despite the

0:02:47.760 --> 0:02:51.320
<v Speaker 1>horrific data that we keep getting out of the real economy,

0:02:51.360 --> 0:02:54.040
<v Speaker 1>perhaps this is a couple of key tech names that

0:02:54.080 --> 0:02:57.560
<v Speaker 1>are rallying well. The rest of the stocks completely lagged behind,

0:02:57.600 --> 0:03:01.120
<v Speaker 1>the small caps down year to date, and it doesn't

0:03:01.160 --> 0:03:05.359
<v Speaker 1>necessarily indicate anything positive, even hope for the economy and

0:03:05.440 --> 0:03:08.280
<v Speaker 1>the month's ahead. Is that a better way to understand

0:03:08.280 --> 0:03:11.480
<v Speaker 1>the rally that we're seeing in equities right now? Yes,

0:03:11.600 --> 0:03:14.440
<v Speaker 1>it's really born out of an extreme oversoul condition when

0:03:14.440 --> 0:03:17.120
<v Speaker 1>everybody got too bearish all at once, and that's what

0:03:17.160 --> 0:03:20.600
<v Speaker 1>we identified as quote unquote the panic low. You know,

0:03:20.680 --> 0:03:23.640
<v Speaker 1>you have you kick off a human nature. There's times

0:03:23.639 --> 0:03:26.440
<v Speaker 1>when human nature is the driver of the market activity,

0:03:26.440 --> 0:03:29.240
<v Speaker 1>and then there's times for fundamentals. For the last ten years,

0:03:29.240 --> 0:03:33.760
<v Speaker 1>it's been a fundamentally driven positive credit backdrop, good earnings

0:03:33.880 --> 0:03:38.360
<v Speaker 1>driven rally. Right now, it's basically everybody got too shortened

0:03:38.360 --> 0:03:41.120
<v Speaker 1>to too out of the market too quickly. Okay, but

0:03:41.160 --> 0:03:44.000
<v Speaker 1>where are we right now on this Friday? Is everybody's

0:03:44.000 --> 0:03:46.040
<v Speaker 1>gonna go home? This weekend like John Farrow and trying

0:03:46.040 --> 0:03:47.360
<v Speaker 1>to figure out what to do with their two oh

0:03:47.400 --> 0:03:53.800
<v Speaker 1>one k. That's true, what's excuse lost my head? I

0:03:53.880 --> 0:03:55.960
<v Speaker 1>went out yesterday for the first time in ten days.

0:03:57.280 --> 0:04:01.040
<v Speaker 1>I was fully protected. Has yep. I know I had

0:04:01.040 --> 0:04:02.760
<v Speaker 1>it has met yep. I had the two things on

0:04:02.800 --> 0:04:07.760
<v Speaker 1>the side, and vet Ye tech came over to tech

0:04:07.800 --> 0:04:11.640
<v Speaker 1>came over to tweak my No tech him over the

0:04:13.560 --> 0:04:16.800
<v Speaker 1>instant vet build than me, Tony, I want to talk

0:04:16.839 --> 0:04:20.000
<v Speaker 1>about what I do this weekend with my four oh

0:04:20.040 --> 0:04:25.200
<v Speaker 1>one k allocation. How enthused are you to reallocate right now,

0:04:25.240 --> 0:04:30.360
<v Speaker 1>to rebalance right now? I'm not really enthused. I would

0:04:30.360 --> 0:04:35.000
<v Speaker 1>have been down despite the economic backdrop, because that was

0:04:35.080 --> 0:04:37.680
<v Speaker 1>down too far too fast. Now I think we've gone

0:04:37.839 --> 0:04:40.920
<v Speaker 1>up too far too fast. So again, Tom, you do

0:04:41.000 --> 0:04:43.159
<v Speaker 1>not want to bet against the guy's printing their money.

0:04:43.160 --> 0:04:46.799
<v Speaker 1>The FED told you they're going to continue to support everything,

0:04:46.880 --> 0:04:49.799
<v Speaker 1>but stocks don't bet against. I would not bet against

0:04:49.839 --> 0:04:52.880
<v Speaker 1>the market, but at this point I also wouldn't chase

0:04:53.040 --> 0:04:56.520
<v Speaker 1>the kind of Relly, not just that it's over a

0:04:56.600 --> 0:04:59.320
<v Speaker 1>very short period of time, but also the kind were

0:04:59.560 --> 0:05:03.400
<v Speaker 1>Lisa engine. Small cap stocks are underperforming and the more

0:05:03.520 --> 0:05:07.400
<v Speaker 1>economically sensitive sectors are also underperforming. Well, let's talk about

0:05:07.400 --> 0:05:09.680
<v Speaker 1>what's working then, what's working really both in the United

0:05:09.720 --> 0:05:11.880
<v Speaker 1>States and Europe, And you saw it pretty pronounced in

0:05:11.960 --> 0:05:15.480
<v Speaker 1>yesterday's price action I T and healthcare, what's lacking? What's

0:05:15.560 --> 0:05:18.160
<v Speaker 1>uply financials and energy? You're just saying, stick with the

0:05:18.160 --> 0:05:22.159
<v Speaker 1>stuff that's working. That's at this point, you would that

0:05:22.200 --> 0:05:25.720
<v Speaker 1>would that's the leadership. Um, Honestly, I'd be pretty sector

0:05:25.760 --> 0:05:28.240
<v Speaker 1>neutral right now. I think that there are there are

0:05:28.279 --> 0:05:30.320
<v Speaker 1>times where you can have a high conviction call and

0:05:30.360 --> 0:05:32.479
<v Speaker 1>there's times when you don't. And this is as you

0:05:32.520 --> 0:05:34.440
<v Speaker 1>guys know, we've been doing this for a number of years.

0:05:34.440 --> 0:05:36.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm pretty happy to make a high conviction call when

0:05:36.560 --> 0:05:40.480
<v Speaker 1>I have one. At this point, this is a tactical rally. UM,

0:05:40.640 --> 0:05:44.359
<v Speaker 1>I don't think I would chase the strength and I think, uh,

0:05:44.440 --> 0:05:47.360
<v Speaker 1>it's just a good time it to just be neutral

0:05:47.680 --> 0:05:50.760
<v Speaker 1>and wait for more economic data. Sonny, always appreciate your

0:05:50.800 --> 0:05:52.600
<v Speaker 1>honesty and thanks for it. Signed this morning, I hope

0:05:52.600 --> 0:05:54.760
<v Speaker 1>you and you also doing pretty well, Tony to that

0:05:55.000 --> 0:06:08.880
<v Speaker 1>of kind of cogenency for our audience worldwide on Bloomberg

0:06:08.920 --> 0:06:12.120
<v Speaker 1>TV and on Bloomberg Radio. I'm very pleased to say that.

0:06:12.120 --> 0:06:15.599
<v Speaker 1>We're joined now by the president of the Cleveland Bank

0:06:15.760 --> 0:06:19.360
<v Speaker 1>of the Federal Reserve, alongside Bloomberg's Michael McKee, who would

0:06:19.400 --> 0:06:21.760
<v Speaker 1>join us for this interview. The Cleveland Fed president joined

0:06:21.839 --> 0:06:24.720
<v Speaker 1>us now. The rdamester fantastic to catch up with you.

0:06:24.960 --> 0:06:26.600
<v Speaker 1>I just want to reflect on the data that we've

0:06:26.640 --> 0:06:29.920
<v Speaker 1>had for this economy because it has been brutal, twenty

0:06:30.040 --> 0:06:33.839
<v Speaker 1>two million jobless claims in a single month, wiping out

0:06:33.880 --> 0:06:36.520
<v Speaker 1>a decade of jobs growth. I want you to help

0:06:36.600 --> 0:06:39.600
<v Speaker 1>us understand how you see the future path for policy

0:06:39.880 --> 0:06:43.480
<v Speaker 1>together with this recovery as these economies slowly normalize at

0:06:43.520 --> 0:06:46.960
<v Speaker 1>the back end of this year. Yeah, so you're right,

0:06:47.040 --> 0:06:51.880
<v Speaker 1>the data is very ugly. UM not unexpected given what

0:06:51.920 --> 0:06:54.120
<v Speaker 1>we've decided as a country to do in the best

0:06:54.160 --> 0:06:56.839
<v Speaker 1>interest of public health, which is of course social distancing

0:06:56.880 --> 0:07:00.520
<v Speaker 1>and shutting down um in the medical expert tell us

0:07:00.560 --> 0:07:03.000
<v Speaker 1>that's the best way to control the virus. So what

0:07:03.040 --> 0:07:06.920
<v Speaker 1>you've seen is all the numbers coming in basically reflect

0:07:06.960 --> 0:07:10.400
<v Speaker 1>that shutdown and activity, the fact that many firms are

0:07:10.400 --> 0:07:13.840
<v Speaker 1>furlowing workers. You see that in initial claims numbers, you

0:07:13.880 --> 0:07:17.640
<v Speaker 1>see workers being laid off. This is very very painful

0:07:17.880 --> 0:07:21.160
<v Speaker 1>for everyone. UM. Not only do you have to deal

0:07:21.200 --> 0:07:23.560
<v Speaker 1>with illness and sickness, but then you also have to

0:07:23.600 --> 0:07:27.400
<v Speaker 1>worry about, um, your financial well being. So you know,

0:07:27.560 --> 0:07:30.240
<v Speaker 1>small businesses throughout our district, in the fourth district the

0:07:30.240 --> 0:07:33.120
<v Speaker 1>Midwest are telling us, you know, this is an incredibly

0:07:33.240 --> 0:07:38.000
<v Speaker 1>unprecedented event for them. So I'm not that surprised about

0:07:38.000 --> 0:07:43.440
<v Speaker 1>the actual numbers per se, because we we've engineered this shutdown.

0:07:43.520 --> 0:07:48.000
<v Speaker 1>The question is going forward, can we put in policies?

0:07:48.040 --> 0:07:50.000
<v Speaker 1>And I think the said in the federal government have

0:07:50.120 --> 0:07:53.400
<v Speaker 1>been trying to do this to get people from the

0:07:53.480 --> 0:07:58.040
<v Speaker 1>economy that looked good in February through this pandemic shutdown

0:07:58.120 --> 0:08:01.760
<v Speaker 1>period so that when economy begins to open up again,

0:08:02.040 --> 0:08:05.280
<v Speaker 1>they have the wherewithal um to sort of have the

0:08:05.360 --> 0:08:08.360
<v Speaker 1>recovery come on board. And so a lot of the

0:08:08.440 --> 0:08:10.360
<v Speaker 1>things that the SET is doing is to try and

0:08:10.360 --> 0:08:12.680
<v Speaker 1>to make sure that there's a good foundation in terms

0:08:12.760 --> 0:08:16.720
<v Speaker 1>of functioning markets, which of course is vital for an

0:08:16.760 --> 0:08:20.840
<v Speaker 1>economy to get you know, credit UM and lending to

0:08:21.480 --> 0:08:25.280
<v Speaker 1>the households and businesses that need it UM to reduce

0:08:25.440 --> 0:08:29.120
<v Speaker 1>collateral damage UM and mitigate some of the impacts from

0:08:29.160 --> 0:08:31.840
<v Speaker 1>the shutdown, so that when we get to the point

0:08:31.880 --> 0:08:35.280
<v Speaker 1>where the economy reopens, the recovery is in the best

0:08:35.320 --> 0:08:41.520
<v Speaker 1>possible place it can be given this unprecedented shutdown and activity. Laretta,

0:08:41.600 --> 0:08:45.160
<v Speaker 1>This is Michael. Um. When you talk about when we're

0:08:45.160 --> 0:08:47.680
<v Speaker 1>going to open up, what are CEOs in your district

0:08:47.720 --> 0:08:50.120
<v Speaker 1>and you're the heart of manufacturing country in the US.

0:08:50.160 --> 0:08:52.520
<v Speaker 1>What are they telling you about the damage they see

0:08:52.559 --> 0:08:56.080
<v Speaker 1>now and when they think they can reopen, and what

0:08:56.240 --> 0:08:59.160
<v Speaker 1>the economy will look like when we do. Will they

0:08:59.200 --> 0:09:02.880
<v Speaker 1>have customers? Well, they ramp up rapidly. What do you

0:09:02.880 --> 0:09:06.320
<v Speaker 1>see from Cleveland? Right, So we're all working on this

0:09:06.480 --> 0:09:10.040
<v Speaker 1>right now. Um. As you know, Governor Dawine of Ohio

0:09:10.880 --> 0:09:14.320
<v Speaker 1>is doing daily press conferences and he yesterday said that

0:09:14.360 --> 0:09:18.920
<v Speaker 1>he's aiming for May first for some type of reopening.

0:09:18.920 --> 0:09:21.640
<v Speaker 1>But of course that reopening is going to be done

0:09:21.840 --> 0:09:26.640
<v Speaker 1>very carefully in stage because no one wants to go backward. Um.

0:09:26.720 --> 0:09:29.800
<v Speaker 1>And so really it's really thinking through now what those

0:09:29.800 --> 0:09:33.040
<v Speaker 1>criteria would be, you know, And we have some examples

0:09:33.080 --> 0:09:35.840
<v Speaker 1>of firms that did stay open as essential companies of

0:09:35.880 --> 0:09:38.480
<v Speaker 1>how they've been able to do it, for example, grocery stores.

0:09:38.559 --> 0:09:41.800
<v Speaker 1>So taking some of the lessons about how do you

0:09:41.840 --> 0:09:45.720
<v Speaker 1>do social distancing within a store, how do you do

0:09:45.800 --> 0:09:48.920
<v Speaker 1>social distancing within a manufacturing plan, and trying to apply

0:09:49.120 --> 0:09:52.000
<v Speaker 1>those So, you know, my view and talking to the

0:09:52.040 --> 0:09:55.320
<v Speaker 1>firms is everyone realizes that everyone wants to kind of

0:09:55.360 --> 0:09:58.520
<v Speaker 1>get back to work, but everyone realizes that how you

0:09:58.600 --> 0:10:02.320
<v Speaker 1>do that u UM really is has to be done

0:10:02.400 --> 0:10:05.120
<v Speaker 1>very carefully. And so we're you know, we expect to

0:10:05.160 --> 0:10:10.400
<v Speaker 1>see social distancing practices continue. UM certainly you know, uh,

0:10:10.600 --> 0:10:13.880
<v Speaker 1>personal protective equipment like maths and gloves will be part

0:10:13.920 --> 0:10:16.959
<v Speaker 1>of that. So it's got to be done very thoughtfully.

0:10:17.160 --> 0:10:20.960
<v Speaker 1>Some things will be able to reopen that make it

0:10:21.240 --> 0:10:25.400
<v Speaker 1>you know that can do social distancing more easily than others. UM.

0:10:25.440 --> 0:10:29.520
<v Speaker 1>You wouldn't expect to see big conventions or or even uh,

0:10:29.600 --> 0:10:32.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, conferences where you have people, um, a lot

0:10:32.400 --> 0:10:35.200
<v Speaker 1>of people around. You have to be very careful about

0:10:35.200 --> 0:10:37.040
<v Speaker 1>how you do it. But everyone kind of has a

0:10:37.080 --> 0:10:39.640
<v Speaker 1>goal of wanting to kind of get back to opening

0:10:39.679 --> 0:10:42.480
<v Speaker 1>up activity. You know, partly because when you think about it,

0:10:42.559 --> 0:10:46.640
<v Speaker 1>this is very painful for so you know, small businesses. UM,

0:10:46.679 --> 0:10:48.520
<v Speaker 1>you know some of them have had to shut down,

0:10:49.320 --> 0:10:52.440
<v Speaker 1>very painful for people that you know have you know,

0:10:52.480 --> 0:10:55.000
<v Speaker 1>have lost their jobs in certain sectors are bearing the

0:10:55.040 --> 0:10:58.320
<v Speaker 1>brunt of this and so um. This is why I

0:10:58.360 --> 0:11:00.960
<v Speaker 1>think you've seen unprecedented act and at both the federal

0:11:01.000 --> 0:11:03.880
<v Speaker 1>Reserve and at the federal government level of trying to

0:11:03.960 --> 0:11:09.559
<v Speaker 1>mitigate the negatives um on the economy from the appropriate

0:11:09.600 --> 0:11:13.040
<v Speaker 1>policy of social distancing and shutting down the activity in

0:11:13.160 --> 0:11:16.280
<v Speaker 1>order to get the virus under control. Well, do you

0:11:16.280 --> 0:11:19.200
<v Speaker 1>think maybe markets are getting a little bit ahead of

0:11:19.720 --> 0:11:23.840
<v Speaker 1>themselves in pricing in a very rapid recovery at this point,

0:11:24.280 --> 0:11:26.560
<v Speaker 1>when do you think we start growing again and and

0:11:26.720 --> 0:11:31.480
<v Speaker 1>how quickly? Yeah? So, I mean, as you've seen, I

0:11:31.520 --> 0:11:33.360
<v Speaker 1>think that there are going to be different parts of

0:11:33.360 --> 0:11:36.280
<v Speaker 1>the country that are going to feel that they're capable

0:11:36.360 --> 0:11:40.600
<v Speaker 1>of bringing back some businesses when the virus has kind

0:11:40.600 --> 0:11:42.960
<v Speaker 1>of gotten to a point where the curve starts to

0:11:43.040 --> 0:11:45.600
<v Speaker 1>flatten and then move down. So you're going to see

0:11:45.600 --> 0:11:48.640
<v Speaker 1>that not all of businesses and not all parts of

0:11:48.679 --> 0:11:52.319
<v Speaker 1>the coming opening at the same time. So as that happens,

0:11:53.040 --> 0:11:56.080
<v Speaker 1>you would expect to see at least in terms of numbers,

0:11:56.120 --> 0:12:00.400
<v Speaker 1>in terms of percentages, looking like they're they're moving back up.

0:12:00.600 --> 0:12:03.960
<v Speaker 1>Right when you go from zero base to activity. You're

0:12:04.000 --> 0:12:06.560
<v Speaker 1>going to see some increase in terms of the percentage

0:12:06.679 --> 0:12:09.400
<v Speaker 1>rise in some of those numbers, but that nowhere need

0:12:10.240 --> 0:12:13.760
<v Speaker 1>nowhere implies that, right we've made up what we lost

0:12:13.800 --> 0:12:16.480
<v Speaker 1>by the shutdown, and so you know, you might see

0:12:16.520 --> 0:12:19.319
<v Speaker 1>some of the numbers of like percentage grows an output

0:12:19.400 --> 0:12:22.200
<v Speaker 1>looking like they're coming back, you know, maybe in the

0:12:22.280 --> 0:12:25.920
<v Speaker 1>third quarters if things start to open up in certain areas,

0:12:25.960 --> 0:12:28.880
<v Speaker 1>But again, that doesn't mean that you're truly back to

0:12:29.679 --> 0:12:31.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, activity, being back to normal. It's just gonna

0:12:31.800 --> 0:12:34.840
<v Speaker 1>take time. Right if you're a manufacturing plant, um, and

0:12:34.920 --> 0:12:38.520
<v Speaker 1>you don't have you know, supplies, um, it's gonna take

0:12:38.559 --> 0:12:41.079
<v Speaker 1>time for you to kind of bring back your workers,

0:12:41.640 --> 0:12:44.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, get the supply of inputs that you need

0:12:44.360 --> 0:12:46.600
<v Speaker 1>to start picking out activity. And then of course it

0:12:46.600 --> 0:12:48.440
<v Speaker 1>depends on what demand you're going to say, so I

0:12:48.480 --> 0:12:51.559
<v Speaker 1>think it will take some time where the economy to

0:12:51.679 --> 0:12:53.640
<v Speaker 1>kind of pick back up. And right now we're in

0:12:53.679 --> 0:12:56.360
<v Speaker 1>this still in the phase of making sure we get

0:12:56.400 --> 0:13:01.160
<v Speaker 1>to that point without you know, as as best we can.

0:13:01.280 --> 0:13:05.160
<v Speaker 1>We're trying to limit the damage, um, the economic damage,

0:13:05.160 --> 0:13:07.640
<v Speaker 1>and get people so that they can sort of resume

0:13:07.800 --> 0:13:12.720
<v Speaker 1>things in the best way possible, Lorendo, we're up against

0:13:12.720 --> 0:13:14.080
<v Speaker 1>the clocks. I want to jump in and get as

0:13:14.080 --> 0:13:16.600
<v Speaker 1>many questions in as possible if we can. I don't

0:13:16.600 --> 0:13:18.480
<v Speaker 1>want to be toned deaf to what's happening in the markets.

0:13:18.720 --> 0:13:21.440
<v Speaker 1>Right now. We have a seventeen handle on w t

0:13:21.520 --> 0:13:24.160
<v Speaker 1>I crude, we have some real risk and high yield

0:13:24.240 --> 0:13:27.200
<v Speaker 1>space of defaults. Yet people have been encouraged to pile

0:13:27.240 --> 0:13:29.000
<v Speaker 1>on that risk in the last week because the Federal

0:13:29.000 --> 0:13:32.520
<v Speaker 1>Reserve has suggested it will go into high yield. Can

0:13:32.600 --> 0:13:35.800
<v Speaker 1>you see why that's encouraging risky behavior at a time

0:13:35.840 --> 0:13:39.959
<v Speaker 1>when maybe we shouldn't be doing that. So we're in

0:13:40.040 --> 0:13:45.000
<v Speaker 1>a you know, a real unprecedented, incredibly deep, deep shock

0:13:45.080 --> 0:13:47.920
<v Speaker 1>to the economy, and I think if the Who's us,

0:13:47.960 --> 0:13:51.640
<v Speaker 1>that the send to really use our tools as best

0:13:51.679 --> 0:13:55.679
<v Speaker 1>we can to get us through this pandemic shutdown period,

0:13:56.280 --> 0:13:59.839
<v Speaker 1>mitigating the negative impact on the economy so that the

0:14:00.040 --> 0:14:02.920
<v Speaker 1>recovery can be as deaf as it can be when

0:14:02.920 --> 0:14:05.920
<v Speaker 1>we get to that point. Yes, we are moving into

0:14:06.040 --> 0:14:09.920
<v Speaker 1>unprecedented territories, but remember we're trying to then lend a

0:14:10.040 --> 0:14:14.040
<v Speaker 1>firms um that, through no fault of their own, were

0:14:14.080 --> 0:14:17.240
<v Speaker 1>impacted by the virus, and so there are you know,

0:14:17.320 --> 0:14:20.320
<v Speaker 1>we are going into, for example, UM corporate debt progments

0:14:20.320 --> 0:14:22.800
<v Speaker 1>which we haven't done before UM, and we are going

0:14:22.800 --> 0:14:26.840
<v Speaker 1>to include some fallen angels right that, you know, kind

0:14:26.840 --> 0:14:31.760
<v Speaker 1>of investment grade rating before the virus sits. So you're

0:14:31.840 --> 0:14:34.840
<v Speaker 1>right that we are doing things that we hadn't done before.

0:14:35.280 --> 0:14:37.560
<v Speaker 1>But at this point, I don't think we can be

0:14:37.760 --> 0:14:41.480
<v Speaker 1>that concerned about UM those kind of moral hazards. I

0:14:41.520 --> 0:14:43.800
<v Speaker 1>really think we have to really look at this is

0:14:43.840 --> 0:14:48.240
<v Speaker 1>a hugely impactful and negatively impactful shock, and we have

0:14:48.320 --> 0:14:50.800
<v Speaker 1>to do all we can to make sure that we're

0:14:50.840 --> 0:14:55.280
<v Speaker 1>not doing permanent damage to the underlying fundamentals of the

0:14:55.280 --> 0:14:58.200
<v Speaker 1>economy so that when the time comes and activity can

0:14:58.200 --> 0:15:01.040
<v Speaker 1>pick up, we can get a d sent recovery out

0:15:01.040 --> 0:15:04.320
<v Speaker 1>of this. A lot of what you just said will

0:15:04.360 --> 0:15:07.320
<v Speaker 1>make sense to a lot of people where people struggle, though, Loretta,

0:15:07.360 --> 0:15:09.960
<v Speaker 1>and maybe you can help us. Buying double B credits

0:15:10.000 --> 0:15:12.760
<v Speaker 1>that were triple B before this might make sense to

0:15:12.800 --> 0:15:16.480
<v Speaker 1>tons of people. The huge employers buying high yield ETFs

0:15:17.240 --> 0:15:19.960
<v Speaker 1>that have triple C credit in them, exposed to a

0:15:20.080 --> 0:15:23.000
<v Speaker 1>very shaky energy sector that weren't on firm footing before

0:15:23.040 --> 0:15:29.400
<v Speaker 1>this doesn't make sense, why the decision by jun ytfs. Yeah,

0:15:29.640 --> 0:15:31.960
<v Speaker 1>so part of what we're doing and all the things

0:15:32.000 --> 0:15:35.160
<v Speaker 1>that we're doing are twofold. One is right. We're trying

0:15:35.200 --> 0:15:40.000
<v Speaker 1>to make sure that the markets say functioning. So some

0:15:40.040 --> 0:15:42.560
<v Speaker 1>of the efforts of the set is done right are

0:15:42.600 --> 0:15:45.480
<v Speaker 1>really geared at market functioning and some of them are

0:15:45.520 --> 0:15:48.840
<v Speaker 1>geared to make sure that right we mitigate the negative

0:15:48.840 --> 0:15:51.960
<v Speaker 1>effects on households and businesses by making sure that we

0:15:52.040 --> 0:15:55.080
<v Speaker 1>have credit flowing to those businesses. So I look at

0:15:55.120 --> 0:15:57.120
<v Speaker 1>the E t F. Part of that is a market

0:15:57.200 --> 0:16:00.280
<v Speaker 1>functioning issue, um and so, and we're continuing need to

0:16:00.320 --> 0:16:03.320
<v Speaker 1>look for gaps to make sure that our markets are functioning.

0:16:03.360 --> 0:16:04.920
<v Speaker 1>And I would say that some of the efforts that

0:16:04.920 --> 0:16:09.080
<v Speaker 1>we've taken already have improved functioning in the market. So

0:16:09.240 --> 0:16:11.880
<v Speaker 1>there's two things going on. One of us is making

0:16:11.920 --> 0:16:15.400
<v Speaker 1>sure that and this is the FED responsibility, right, is

0:16:15.440 --> 0:16:17.480
<v Speaker 1>to make sure that we have markets that are well

0:16:17.560 --> 0:16:21.560
<v Speaker 1>functioning so that credit can flow right and do what

0:16:21.680 --> 0:16:25.040
<v Speaker 1>it can to help shore up the economy to prepare

0:16:25.080 --> 0:16:28.240
<v Speaker 1>it for the recovery. So, you know, we can get

0:16:28.280 --> 0:16:30.360
<v Speaker 1>and we can disagree on kind of what the right

0:16:30.400 --> 0:16:32.040
<v Speaker 1>way to do that is, but part of what we're

0:16:32.080 --> 0:16:33.840
<v Speaker 1>doing is to try to make sure that we have

0:16:34.040 --> 0:16:39.040
<v Speaker 1>functioning financial markets precisely because those are an essential ingredient

0:16:39.920 --> 0:16:42.640
<v Speaker 1>for the economy. For that any other policies that we

0:16:42.680 --> 0:16:46.360
<v Speaker 1>do can flow through, so there's a transmission to the

0:16:46.440 --> 0:16:51.160
<v Speaker 1>households and businesses that need those fundings. We got about

0:16:51.240 --> 0:16:54.240
<v Speaker 1>two minutes left Lare and I know that at this

0:16:54.320 --> 0:16:57.240
<v Speaker 1>point the FED is all in doing everything it can

0:16:57.280 --> 0:16:59.600
<v Speaker 1>to try to support the economy. When we get to

0:16:59.680 --> 0:17:04.400
<v Speaker 1>that quarter maybe reopening and it's time to stimulate the economy,

0:17:04.440 --> 0:17:06.760
<v Speaker 1>is there more you think you need to do or

0:17:06.960 --> 0:17:10.840
<v Speaker 1>can do, and what would that be? So I think

0:17:10.880 --> 0:17:13.159
<v Speaker 1>we're going to have to see how um, what it

0:17:13.200 --> 0:17:15.320
<v Speaker 1>looks like when we get there. I don't think we're

0:17:15.400 --> 0:17:17.960
<v Speaker 1>up against any kind of constraint on what we can do,

0:17:18.080 --> 0:17:21.439
<v Speaker 1>as you've seem that we we I think we acted

0:17:21.720 --> 0:17:28.800
<v Speaker 1>um appropriately rapidly, um in an unprecedented rapidly way really

0:17:28.840 --> 0:17:32.800
<v Speaker 1>because of the recognition of how deep this this shock

0:17:33.160 --> 0:17:36.960
<v Speaker 1>was um and engineered because of the investment we're making

0:17:36.960 --> 0:17:40.080
<v Speaker 1>in public health. Right. So when we get to that point,

0:17:40.160 --> 0:17:42.600
<v Speaker 1>we're going to look at our tools do what we

0:17:42.720 --> 0:17:45.879
<v Speaker 1>can again. To support some of the programs that the

0:17:45.880 --> 0:17:48.760
<v Speaker 1>federal government is doing UM in terms of like the

0:17:48.800 --> 0:17:52.040
<v Speaker 1>p PP, the Paycheck Protection Program, etcetera. And then be

0:17:52.160 --> 0:17:56.240
<v Speaker 1>prepared to use our tools as appropriate to make sure

0:17:56.240 --> 0:17:59.280
<v Speaker 1>one market function and two that we're supporting the economy

0:17:59.359 --> 0:18:02.480
<v Speaker 1>as we all nes do UM, so that we can

0:18:02.520 --> 0:18:07.280
<v Speaker 1>get back to a normal sustainable growth with UM, full

0:18:07.359 --> 0:18:10.960
<v Speaker 1>employment and price stability. And so that's what our goal

0:18:11.080 --> 0:18:13.960
<v Speaker 1>is going to be. That's what our goals always are UM,

0:18:14.000 --> 0:18:16.640
<v Speaker 1>and we have tools to do that. We have forward guidings,

0:18:16.720 --> 0:18:19.440
<v Speaker 1>we have our interest rate tools that we're doing right

0:18:19.480 --> 0:18:22.200
<v Speaker 1>now at zero UM, and we're going to move those

0:18:22.240 --> 0:18:25.720
<v Speaker 1>things around as appropriate UM to make sure that the

0:18:25.760 --> 0:18:32.959
<v Speaker 1>economy can recover and get back to a sustainable growth path. Laura,

0:18:33.080 --> 0:18:34.240
<v Speaker 1>we have to leave it that and I have to

0:18:34.280 --> 0:18:36.159
<v Speaker 1>say thank you to you for your time a conversation.

0:18:36.240 --> 0:18:38.760
<v Speaker 1>We will continue la right amester that the President of

0:18:38.800 --> 0:18:41.439
<v Speaker 1>the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland a special thanks to

0:18:41.440 --> 0:18:43.400
<v Speaker 1>our already in some blind Bug TV and a blind

0:18:43.400 --> 0:18:56.119
<v Speaker 1>Bug Radio. This is with our question, our definitive discussion

0:18:56.200 --> 0:19:00.520
<v Speaker 1>this week and the microbiology and the virology of this endemic.

0:19:00.600 --> 0:19:03.639
<v Speaker 1>Andrew Pallis is out of Rutger's in Pen He is

0:19:03.640 --> 0:19:07.120
<v Speaker 1>at the Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health.

0:19:07.160 --> 0:19:10.440
<v Speaker 1>I should point out that Mr Bloomberg has provided philanthropy

0:19:10.520 --> 0:19:13.080
<v Speaker 1>to his Johns Hopkins University, and of course as the

0:19:13.119 --> 0:19:16.800
<v Speaker 1>founder of Bloomberg Gulp and this television and radio station.

0:19:17.320 --> 0:19:23.760
<v Speaker 1>This is an extraordinary expert on microbiology and vera virology.

0:19:23.840 --> 0:19:29.920
<v Speaker 1>Let's listen to Professor Pelkos. This virus is truly interesting

0:19:29.920 --> 0:19:33.840
<v Speaker 1>in the sense that it causes this broad spectrum of diseases.

0:19:34.000 --> 0:19:37.119
<v Speaker 1>So it's very true that the vast majority of people

0:19:37.160 --> 0:19:40.040
<v Speaker 1>will suffer what we call sort of mild to moderate diseases,

0:19:40.560 --> 0:19:43.440
<v Speaker 1>maybe even know symptoms at all. But when you look

0:19:43.520 --> 0:19:48.480
<v Speaker 1>at UM, the vulnerable portions of the population, the elderly,

0:19:49.080 --> 0:19:52.160
<v Speaker 1>when you look at people with secondary medical conditions such

0:19:52.160 --> 0:19:55.119
<v Speaker 1>as diabetes, heart disease, of a lung disease, and to

0:19:55.160 --> 0:19:58.520
<v Speaker 1>be honest, even when you look at relatively healthy individuals UM,

0:19:58.880 --> 0:20:01.040
<v Speaker 1>there are a significant a number of part of the

0:20:01.040 --> 0:20:04.760
<v Speaker 1>population that has very severe disease requiring, if not a

0:20:04.840 --> 0:20:09.720
<v Speaker 1>hospital visit, um um admission into the hospital. So it

0:20:09.840 --> 0:20:12.879
<v Speaker 1>runs in a huge spectrum in terms of how it

0:20:12.960 --> 0:20:16.439
<v Speaker 1>presents after infection. I don't want to talk enzymes on

0:20:16.480 --> 0:20:18.879
<v Speaker 1>a Friday, and I certainly don't want to talk RNA

0:20:18.960 --> 0:20:23.560
<v Speaker 1>transcript taste and the other necessities of doing a test.

0:20:24.240 --> 0:20:28.359
<v Speaker 1>But I would suggest, respectfully, doctor that America from a

0:20:28.440 --> 0:20:36.480
<v Speaker 1>top down doesn't understand the sophisticated chemistry and biochemistry of tests.

0:20:37.000 --> 0:20:40.200
<v Speaker 1>How hard is it to do a test and millions

0:20:40.240 --> 0:20:44.480
<v Speaker 1>of tests for this virus. So we know in a

0:20:44.600 --> 0:20:48.640
<v Speaker 1>lot about the virus, and you certainly can do good testing.

0:20:48.960 --> 0:20:51.520
<v Speaker 1>It requires not only a good test, but it also

0:20:51.600 --> 0:20:56.679
<v Speaker 1>requires a good laboratory that's validated, that knows how to detesting,

0:20:56.960 --> 0:20:59.240
<v Speaker 1>that knows how to do the controls, and knows how

0:20:59.320 --> 0:21:03.160
<v Speaker 1>to show that they can reproducibly perform the tests well.

0:21:03.840 --> 0:21:06.320
<v Speaker 1>So that's where it's really important to be focused in

0:21:06.400 --> 0:21:10.120
<v Speaker 1>on public health agencies and medical institutions that know how

0:21:10.119 --> 0:21:13.200
<v Speaker 1>to do these tests. Professor Pekosh talk to us about

0:21:13.200 --> 0:21:17.159
<v Speaker 1>reinfection and immunity. Are people that have had the virus

0:21:17.359 --> 0:21:21.560
<v Speaker 1>really getting infected twice? Yeah? So right now, um, it's

0:21:21.600 --> 0:21:25.800
<v Speaker 1>still a little bit unclear, but this is this gets

0:21:25.800 --> 0:21:29.320
<v Speaker 1>back to the testing issue. Oftentimes, what I've seeing is

0:21:29.359 --> 0:21:32.879
<v Speaker 1>people who are testing positive by the you know the

0:21:32.880 --> 0:21:35.320
<v Speaker 1>test that tells you if you're infected, which is a

0:21:35.359 --> 0:21:38.919
<v Speaker 1>PCR test that the text the virus. That doesn't necessarily

0:21:38.960 --> 0:21:41.360
<v Speaker 1>mean you've been reinfected. It may simply mean that there's

0:21:41.400 --> 0:21:44.160
<v Speaker 1>small amounts of the virus that are still in your

0:21:44.160 --> 0:21:47.679
<v Speaker 1>system UM from the infection that you've already controlled a

0:21:47.720 --> 0:21:50.360
<v Speaker 1>few days ago or a week or so ago. So

0:21:51.080 --> 0:21:53.680
<v Speaker 1>right now, there really is no good evidence to suggest

0:21:53.720 --> 0:21:57.760
<v Speaker 1>that you're getting reinfected after your first exposure. May simply

0:21:57.760 --> 0:22:00.600
<v Speaker 1>be that the virus is hanging around and you see

0:22:00.760 --> 0:22:03.879
<v Speaker 1>vestiges of the virus there after you you've controlled the

0:22:03.920 --> 0:22:07.119
<v Speaker 1>initial infection. But it's something that's very important to understand

0:22:07.440 --> 0:22:11.560
<v Speaker 1>as we think about rolling back in and coming UH

0:22:12.080 --> 0:22:15.000
<v Speaker 1>leaving some of our public health interventions. Do we have

0:22:15.080 --> 0:22:18.000
<v Speaker 1>a credible test to test immunity. There's gonna be a

0:22:18.040 --> 0:22:21.560
<v Speaker 1>two part UH phase to that. Many of the tests

0:22:21.560 --> 0:22:23.720
<v Speaker 1>that are out there will tell you if you've had

0:22:24.200 --> 0:22:28.240
<v Speaker 1>an infection and if you have antibodies UM. Now that's

0:22:28.240 --> 0:22:31.040
<v Speaker 1>important because that'll tell us how many people were infected

0:22:31.080 --> 0:22:34.040
<v Speaker 1>the first time this barus moves through the population. But

0:22:34.160 --> 0:22:36.600
<v Speaker 1>most of those tests don't really tell you if you're

0:22:36.640 --> 0:22:40.040
<v Speaker 1>protected from reinfection. That's going to take a second set

0:22:40.080 --> 0:22:43.879
<v Speaker 1>of tests that are done more in laboratory settings that

0:22:43.960 --> 0:22:46.000
<v Speaker 1>take a little bit of time to develop, but that

0:22:46.040 --> 0:22:49.480
<v Speaker 1>will differentiate people who just have some antibodies to it

0:22:49.680 --> 0:22:52.080
<v Speaker 1>versus the people that have antibodies that we think will

0:22:52.119 --> 0:22:55.520
<v Speaker 1>protect you from reinfection. We'd like to think that those

0:22:55.560 --> 0:22:58.600
<v Speaker 1>are going to be very closely related, but we have

0:22:58.680 --> 0:23:01.920
<v Speaker 1>to do those experiments to be percent sure that the

0:23:02.000 --> 0:23:05.000
<v Speaker 1>rapid tests that people are establishing are really telling you

0:23:05.040 --> 0:23:08.480
<v Speaker 1>that you're protected from infection or reinfection. Help me with

0:23:08.800 --> 0:23:13.640
<v Speaker 1>reject the true or accept the false of this testing.

0:23:14.080 --> 0:23:18.000
<v Speaker 1>How it risks is America to type one and type

0:23:18.040 --> 0:23:22.760
<v Speaker 1>two malfunction in our testing. So again it gets back

0:23:22.800 --> 0:23:25.800
<v Speaker 1>to the laboratories that are doing the testing and making

0:23:25.840 --> 0:23:31.480
<v Speaker 1>sure that the tests are being performed in m rigorous,

0:23:31.840 --> 0:23:37.119
<v Speaker 1>controlled environments. UM. You can have two types of errors, right.

0:23:37.240 --> 0:23:39.800
<v Speaker 1>You can have a false positive, meaning that you test

0:23:39.880 --> 0:23:43.680
<v Speaker 1>positive when you really aren't infected UM And the other

0:23:43.720 --> 0:23:46.000
<v Speaker 1>type of error is that you test negative when you

0:23:46.040 --> 0:23:49.639
<v Speaker 1>really are infected. And it's that latter group that's really

0:23:49.680 --> 0:23:53.800
<v Speaker 1>the most important to be aware of because that really

0:23:53.840 --> 0:23:56.560
<v Speaker 1>means that you're telling people who are infected that they

0:23:56.560 --> 0:23:59.800
<v Speaker 1>can go back out in the population and behave you know,

0:24:00.600 --> 0:24:04.640
<v Speaker 1>and not take extra precautions. And again, laboratories that know

0:24:04.720 --> 0:24:08.800
<v Speaker 1>how to perform these tests do something called validation, right,

0:24:08.840 --> 0:24:11.800
<v Speaker 1>so they go through and they test with known samples

0:24:12.640 --> 0:24:16.760
<v Speaker 1>both types of error and report back what exactly they

0:24:16.800 --> 0:24:20.080
<v Speaker 1>expect those errors to be. Um other laboratories that are

0:24:20.160 --> 0:24:22.560
<v Speaker 1>just sort of fly by night may not be reporting

0:24:22.560 --> 0:24:25.359
<v Speaker 1>that rigorously. And that's where some of the danger comes in.

0:24:26.560 --> 0:24:29.920
<v Speaker 1>With Francine Laquid and myself, he's with JOHNS. Hopkins University

0:24:29.920 --> 0:24:44.639
<v Speaker 1>of Bloomberg School of Public Health. Jared Bernstein's listening to scoring.

0:24:44.760 --> 0:24:49.960
<v Speaker 1>Why am I on faring say, scratching his head. Jared

0:24:50.000 --> 0:24:53.480
<v Speaker 1>Bernstein knows that Vice President Biden of course will probably

0:24:53.520 --> 0:24:56.200
<v Speaker 1>take Fargo. We'll see how that goes in the election.

0:24:56.359 --> 0:24:59.720
<v Speaker 1>Mr Bernstein was economic advisor to the Vice President in

0:24:59.800 --> 0:25:03.480
<v Speaker 1>his definitive in Washington on policy years ago at the

0:25:03.480 --> 0:25:06.199
<v Speaker 1>Economic Policy Institute and now the Center on Budget and

0:25:06.200 --> 0:25:11.679
<v Speaker 1>Policy Priorities. Dr Bernstein is someone everybody reads right, left

0:25:11.760 --> 0:25:14.560
<v Speaker 1>and in the middle as well. Jared John Farrell brought

0:25:14.600 --> 0:25:17.440
<v Speaker 1>it up today, and John, as a British guy, doesn't

0:25:17.560 --> 0:25:23.720
<v Speaker 1>understand the American ethos, the distrust of our federal system.

0:25:23.840 --> 0:25:27.080
<v Speaker 1>Will that maintain in the coming weeks, or can we

0:25:27.160 --> 0:25:32.480
<v Speaker 1>get a federal statement of assistance to Americans like we

0:25:32.560 --> 0:25:38.000
<v Speaker 1>knew in times long past. I think there are those

0:25:38.040 --> 0:25:41.680
<v Speaker 1>who are very skeptical, as you suggested, of the government

0:25:42.040 --> 0:25:45.440
<v Speaker 1>in normal times, But in times like this, people really

0:25:45.480 --> 0:25:48.399
<v Speaker 1>do turn to the federal sector for the kinds of

0:25:48.480 --> 0:25:52.200
<v Speaker 1>help we need meeting existential challenges precisely like this one.

0:25:52.200 --> 0:25:54.840
<v Speaker 1>It's the same as in war time. One thing we've

0:25:54.840 --> 0:26:01.040
<v Speaker 1>certainly seen is a level of bipartisanship in Congress. You know,

0:26:01.160 --> 0:26:04.520
<v Speaker 1>the Cares Act past nine six to zero in the Senate.

0:26:04.680 --> 0:26:07.120
<v Speaker 1>When was the last time something like that happened? So,

0:26:07.160 --> 0:26:09.800
<v Speaker 1>at least for now, I think many Americans walking around

0:26:09.800 --> 0:26:13.440
<v Speaker 1>thinking we shouted government, and probably and probably thinking we

0:26:13.760 --> 0:26:17.760
<v Speaker 1>need a more competent governance down the road. Jared, your

0:26:17.800 --> 0:26:21.679
<v Speaker 1>work was path breaking a decade ago at the Economic

0:26:21.760 --> 0:26:25.960
<v Speaker 1>Policy Institute of saying we need to get money into

0:26:26.000 --> 0:26:31.119
<v Speaker 1>people's hands at certain emergent times. Why is Washington so

0:26:31.520 --> 0:26:38.440
<v Speaker 1>reticent about income replacement? Yeah? Well, I think the main

0:26:39.040 --> 0:26:43.760
<v Speaker 1>reason for that is just a real skepticism about giving

0:26:43.840 --> 0:26:47.240
<v Speaker 1>money to directly to people because of the fear that

0:26:47.359 --> 0:26:50.639
<v Speaker 1>it will cause them to alter their labor supply. I

0:26:50.640 --> 0:26:54.880
<v Speaker 1>think many American policymakers in our commist really overestimate that

0:26:55.040 --> 0:26:58.000
<v Speaker 1>quote labor supply elasticity that says if you give people

0:26:58.000 --> 0:27:01.159
<v Speaker 1>a dollar, they're gonna work less. Well, in fact, most

0:27:01.200 --> 0:27:03.600
<v Speaker 1>people in America, their paychecks are such that they just

0:27:03.680 --> 0:27:05.800
<v Speaker 1>have to keep working if they're going to get by.

0:27:05.840 --> 0:27:08.040
<v Speaker 1>And by the way, right now, we don't want people

0:27:08.080 --> 0:27:09.639
<v Speaker 1>to go to work. So that's one of the reasons

0:27:09.720 --> 0:27:13.240
<v Speaker 1>why folks really need to put that sort of older

0:27:13.280 --> 0:27:16.640
<v Speaker 1>thinking but behind behind right now. The usually statements Jared

0:27:16.720 --> 0:27:18.439
<v Speaker 1>made by people who have never grown up around a

0:27:18.480 --> 0:27:21.560
<v Speaker 1>working class environment and have no clue because most people,

0:27:21.600 --> 0:27:24.120
<v Speaker 1>in fact, everybody I grew up with, wanted the job.

0:27:24.280 --> 0:27:25.919
<v Speaker 1>They didn't want to hand out from the government. And

0:27:25.920 --> 0:27:28.399
<v Speaker 1>as you say, people are being told they have to

0:27:28.440 --> 0:27:31.399
<v Speaker 1>stay at home, businesses are being told they have to

0:27:31.480 --> 0:27:35.400
<v Speaker 1>shut makes me wonder why we're sitting here asking questions

0:27:35.400 --> 0:27:40.520
<v Speaker 1>about why Congress won't top up the paycheck protection program

0:27:40.560 --> 0:27:42.920
<v Speaker 1>for the small business administration. Jared, why are we even

0:27:43.000 --> 0:27:46.760
<v Speaker 1>having the conversation and asking the question, Well, first of all,

0:27:46.840 --> 0:27:48.840
<v Speaker 1>let me just say you're exactly right in the first

0:27:49.240 --> 0:27:52.720
<v Speaker 1>part of your comments right there. I started in some ways.

0:27:52.760 --> 0:27:54.679
<v Speaker 1>I think I'm probably a rare economist, and that I

0:27:54.720 --> 0:27:56.560
<v Speaker 1>started out as a social worker, and one of the

0:27:56.560 --> 0:27:59.480
<v Speaker 1>first things I learned is that people simply can't begin

0:27:59.600 --> 0:28:02.360
<v Speaker 1>to get by on the money they get, at least

0:28:02.400 --> 0:28:05.240
<v Speaker 1>from the American social assistance system. May be different in

0:28:05.280 --> 0:28:09.480
<v Speaker 1>some other countries. Look, I think the scene in Congress

0:28:09.560 --> 0:28:12.440
<v Speaker 1>right now is that both parties want to plus up

0:28:12.800 --> 0:28:16.320
<v Speaker 1>the Paycheck Protection Act because frankly, that money got out

0:28:16.320 --> 0:28:19.160
<v Speaker 1>the door really quickly and it's starting to meet some needs.

0:28:19.840 --> 0:28:23.240
<v Speaker 1>But the Democrats want to add some other pieces that

0:28:23.280 --> 0:28:27.440
<v Speaker 1>are quite necessary to the next phase of the stimulus plan,

0:28:27.440 --> 0:28:30.280
<v Speaker 1>and the Republicans are resisting. So that's what they're squabbling

0:28:30.280 --> 0:28:33.280
<v Speaker 1>about right now. So, Jared, as we have that backdrop,

0:28:33.440 --> 0:28:36.840
<v Speaker 1>we have the unemployment figures that keep coming out with

0:28:36.960 --> 0:28:41.080
<v Speaker 1>jaw dropping numbers. Yesterday the sort of five point two

0:28:41.080 --> 0:28:44.320
<v Speaker 1>million coming in a little low expectations, still mind blowing.

0:28:44.400 --> 0:28:46.320
<v Speaker 1>And you're the perfect person to speak to about how

0:28:46.400 --> 0:28:49.480
<v Speaker 1>quickly these jobs can come back. After your writing getting

0:28:49.480 --> 0:28:52.080
<v Speaker 1>back to full employment in the state of Working America

0:28:52.480 --> 0:28:56.880
<v Speaker 1>a decade of jobs lost in four weeks, how quickly

0:28:57.000 --> 0:29:00.920
<v Speaker 1>can we get them back? You know, it's really an

0:29:00.920 --> 0:29:04.640
<v Speaker 1>epidemiological question more than an economic one. Probably more quickly

0:29:04.640 --> 0:29:08.239
<v Speaker 1>than you'd think, because at least from the information we have,

0:29:08.800 --> 0:29:12.640
<v Speaker 1>many of these folks are on a temporary layoff or furloughed.

0:29:12.880 --> 0:29:16.560
<v Speaker 1>So we're there there's the potential to bounce back, but

0:29:16.680 --> 0:29:19.080
<v Speaker 1>that can only happen. I believe if we get the

0:29:19.120 --> 0:29:21.760
<v Speaker 1>green light, or at least the yellow light. That's more realistic,

0:29:22.120 --> 0:29:25.000
<v Speaker 1>if we get the yellow light from health officials and

0:29:25.040 --> 0:29:27.760
<v Speaker 1>then from governors to do so. I do think that

0:29:27.800 --> 0:29:30.760
<v Speaker 1>any reopening will be a very gradual one. But that's

0:29:30.760 --> 0:29:33.400
<v Speaker 1>why the measures we were just talking about, these measures

0:29:33.400 --> 0:29:37.120
<v Speaker 1>to help keep families and businesses kind of intact between

0:29:37.160 --> 0:29:39.959
<v Speaker 1>now and then, so that there's an economy on the

0:29:39.960 --> 0:29:43.280
<v Speaker 1>other side of this that's capable of bouncing back. Jared,

0:29:43.440 --> 0:29:45.640
<v Speaker 1>this is the key question. It's interesting to hear you

0:29:45.680 --> 0:29:47.960
<v Speaker 1>say this because I've been reading a number of reports

0:29:48.280 --> 0:29:51.080
<v Speaker 1>with people expecting the unemployment rate to remain at about

0:29:51.160 --> 0:29:53.800
<v Speaker 1>ten percent for a prolonged period of time in the

0:29:53.880 --> 0:29:56.720
<v Speaker 1>United States. Are you saying that those estimates are are

0:29:56.960 --> 0:30:00.920
<v Speaker 1>perhaps a little bit too pessimistic. No, I mean, I

0:30:00.960 --> 0:30:05.080
<v Speaker 1>think the unemployment rate is probably above ten percent now,

0:30:05.200 --> 0:30:07.200
<v Speaker 1>and I think we'll be lucky if we if we

0:30:07.280 --> 0:30:10.000
<v Speaker 1>peek out at I know that's a scary number, but

0:30:10.040 --> 0:30:11.720
<v Speaker 1>I think that's the fact that the case. What I'm

0:30:11.760 --> 0:30:14.880
<v Speaker 1>saying is that if you look at some focus our

0:30:14.920 --> 0:30:17.520
<v Speaker 1>friend jan hat C s Obert Goldman, they actually have

0:30:17.720 --> 0:30:20.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of a V shape bounce back built in. But

0:30:20.200 --> 0:30:22.280
<v Speaker 1>that's based on an assumption that we're doing a lot

0:30:22.360 --> 0:30:25.640
<v Speaker 1>more testing and tracing than we're anywhere close to now.

0:30:26.000 --> 0:30:28.480
<v Speaker 1>So I think the answer to your question is just

0:30:28.600 --> 0:30:32.960
<v Speaker 1>conditional on getting the yellow light from the medical community.

0:30:32.960 --> 0:30:35.760
<v Speaker 1>And if you read those folks, they're still quite skeptical

0:30:35.840 --> 0:30:38.320
<v Speaker 1>because we're so far behind the curb on testing. I

0:30:38.400 --> 0:30:40.720
<v Speaker 1>just think that if we do the right thing in

0:30:40.840 --> 0:30:43.480
<v Speaker 1>terms of social and stimulative policy, or maybe call it

0:30:43.560 --> 0:30:47.560
<v Speaker 1>relief policy, to keep households in businesses at least somewhat intact,

0:30:47.800 --> 0:30:49.760
<v Speaker 1>then at least we know when we get the yellow light,

0:30:49.960 --> 0:30:52.240
<v Speaker 1>there'll be in a current it's capable of bouncing back

0:30:52.280 --> 0:30:54.760
<v Speaker 1>on the other side. Jared, quickly, I've got to ask

0:30:54.840 --> 0:30:58.160
<v Speaker 1>the question. The world has changed, America has changed, what's

0:30:58.200 --> 0:31:02.480
<v Speaker 1>the word steam prediction for what's a Burns Burnstein prescription

0:31:03.000 --> 0:31:06.080
<v Speaker 1>for Vice President Biden? What's he need to do right now?

0:31:07.600 --> 0:31:09.880
<v Speaker 1>You know, I thought President Obama said it well in

0:31:09.960 --> 0:31:12.360
<v Speaker 1>his uh in his endorsement the other day, which is

0:31:12.360 --> 0:31:16.560
<v Speaker 1>really worth watching because he actually gets into that precise question. Um,

0:31:16.720 --> 0:31:18.960
<v Speaker 1>he said he wouldn't run on the same platform he

0:31:19.000 --> 0:31:21.400
<v Speaker 1>did in oh eight. And we know that Biden has

0:31:21.440 --> 0:31:24.760
<v Speaker 1>been very influenced by his work with President Obama. So

0:31:24.800 --> 0:31:26.800
<v Speaker 1>this is the time it gets back to your first question.

0:31:26.840 --> 0:31:30.200
<v Speaker 1>This is the time where the country needs and wants

0:31:30.200 --> 0:31:33.920
<v Speaker 1>an amply funded federal sector that is highly competent to

0:31:34.000 --> 0:31:38.120
<v Speaker 1>meet the challenges we face repeatedly these days. Hundred day floods,

0:31:38.120 --> 0:31:42.200
<v Speaker 1>the hundred year floods come every two years. Your sector.

0:31:43.440 --> 0:31:47.400
<v Speaker 1>You know what I'm saying. I mean, we face real challenges, Jared, which,

0:31:47.480 --> 0:31:49.680
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much, Jared Burnstein with us of course

0:31:49.720 --> 0:31:54.320
<v Speaker 1>as the Center on Budget and Policy for Priorities. Thanks

0:31:54.320 --> 0:31:58.560
<v Speaker 1>for listening to the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast. Subscribe and listen

0:31:58.800 --> 0:32:04.120
<v Speaker 1>to interviews on Apple podcast, SoundCloud, or whichever podcast platform

0:32:04.240 --> 0:32:08.560
<v Speaker 1>you prefer. I'm on Twitter at Tom Keene. Before the podcast,

0:32:08.600 --> 0:32:12.080
<v Speaker 1>you can always catch us worldwide. I'm Bloomberg Radio.