1 00:00:00,400 --> 00:00:03,440 Speaker 1: This episode of Body Bags with Joseph Scott Morgan was 2 00:00:03,480 --> 00:00:06,720 Speaker 1: recorded in front of a live audience at crime Con London, 3 00:00:06,760 --> 00:00:07,680 Speaker 1: twenty twenty four. 4 00:00:09,320 --> 00:00:15,480 Speaker 2: Quality Bags with Joseph Scott Morgan. Welcome everybody, it's good 5 00:00:15,520 --> 00:00:18,959 Speaker 2: to see you all, and welcome to crime Con UK 6 00:00:19,239 --> 00:00:23,520 Speaker 2: twenty twenty four. I'm Joseph Scott Morgan and it's great 7 00:00:23,520 --> 00:00:26,759 Speaker 2: to be here. Listen before we go too far into this, 8 00:00:27,520 --> 00:00:30,960 Speaker 2: as you can tell aim from around these parts, so 9 00:00:31,360 --> 00:00:36,000 Speaker 2: bear with me. I've got a question for you real quick. 10 00:00:37,800 --> 00:00:41,680 Speaker 2: I'm confused, and you know I'm an American, so I 11 00:00:41,680 --> 00:00:46,720 Speaker 2: stay kind of confused many times. But with that, I'm 12 00:00:46,760 --> 00:00:49,559 Speaker 2: confused about the language. I'm going to be using a 13 00:00:49,600 --> 00:00:54,760 Speaker 2: word today that for many I understand here in the 14 00:00:54,880 --> 00:00:58,920 Speaker 2: UK in particular, is kind of considered the naughty word. 15 00:01:00,640 --> 00:01:02,959 Speaker 2: So I just want to make sure that I'm not 16 00:01:03,000 --> 00:01:05,080 Speaker 2: going to get in trouble. I don't want you to 17 00:01:05,080 --> 00:01:07,600 Speaker 2: call my mama and wind up having to get in 18 00:01:07,640 --> 00:01:11,360 Speaker 2: my mouth washed out. So and that word is bloody. 19 00:01:11,840 --> 00:01:15,000 Speaker 2: So I don't know how you come down on that issue, 20 00:01:15,480 --> 00:01:18,680 Speaker 2: but that is an issue, and I know it's generational 21 00:01:18,800 --> 00:01:22,240 Speaker 2: perhaps and that some people regard it as a bad word. 22 00:01:22,240 --> 00:01:26,119 Speaker 2: But today we're going to talk about bloody. We're going 23 00:01:26,160 --> 00:01:28,280 Speaker 2: to talk about blood, and we're going to talk about 24 00:01:28,319 --> 00:01:34,080 Speaker 2: blood deposition. And for me, it is one of those 25 00:01:34,120 --> 00:01:39,120 Speaker 2: things in the world of forensic science that gives us 26 00:01:39,200 --> 00:01:42,480 Speaker 2: evidence that there was a life that had in the 27 00:01:42,600 --> 00:01:51,160 Speaker 2: way and addition, in addition to that, the dynamics of 28 00:01:51,200 --> 00:01:54,640 Speaker 2: what went on in the midst during the throes of death. 29 00:01:55,440 --> 00:02:01,640 Speaker 2: So welcome aboard. I'm Joseph Scott Morgan and this is Bodybacks. 30 00:02:02,840 --> 00:02:08,720 Speaker 2: I'd like to welcome a very very distinguished individual with 31 00:02:08,800 --> 00:02:15,080 Speaker 2: us today, Millington Joe. I got to tell you we've 32 00:02:15,160 --> 00:02:17,680 Speaker 2: only gotten to know one another over the last I 33 00:02:17,680 --> 00:02:20,160 Speaker 2: guess probably a month and a half through text and 34 00:02:20,720 --> 00:02:24,240 Speaker 2: through emails. Let me tell you how generous she is. 35 00:02:24,960 --> 00:02:30,680 Speaker 2: I'm a forensics professor in the US, and I'm interested 36 00:02:30,840 --> 00:02:35,000 Speaker 2: with my UNI of trying to do exchange programs here 37 00:02:35,080 --> 00:02:37,680 Speaker 2: in the UK because I think that, in my estimation, 38 00:02:37,840 --> 00:02:40,400 Speaker 2: you guys do it better than anybody else in the world, 39 00:02:40,960 --> 00:02:44,000 Speaker 2: and I want our kids to be exposed to practice. 40 00:02:44,280 --> 00:02:47,360 Speaker 2: And because of that, Joe said, I will set you 41 00:02:47,480 --> 00:02:50,200 Speaker 2: up and she has put me in contact with I 42 00:02:50,240 --> 00:02:53,240 Speaker 2: think a total of five universities. So I've spent quite 43 00:02:53,280 --> 00:02:55,240 Speaker 2: a bit of time traveling about the country. I've been 44 00:02:55,240 --> 00:02:57,000 Speaker 2: here for a week thus far, still have a few 45 00:02:57,000 --> 00:03:00,760 Speaker 2: more days left. Yesterday I was actually a King University 46 00:03:00,760 --> 00:03:03,440 Speaker 2: and that one of your colleagues there, And interestingly enough, 47 00:03:03,480 --> 00:03:06,600 Speaker 2: they have a freestanding crime scene house there and they've 48 00:03:06,600 --> 00:03:09,960 Speaker 2: already got it and prepped for her to come and 49 00:03:10,080 --> 00:03:14,480 Speaker 2: teach bloodstained pattern analysis there. And I think she spends 50 00:03:14,560 --> 00:03:17,000 Speaker 2: quite a bit of time there, don't you, Joe. I do. 51 00:03:17,160 --> 00:03:21,680 Speaker 1: Hi? Hi everyone, So I deliver a bloodstained patent training 52 00:03:21,840 --> 00:03:25,799 Speaker 1: to this at Euston University, and they specially kit out 53 00:03:25,840 --> 00:03:28,760 Speaker 1: one of the rooms white, covering it in white paper 54 00:03:28,840 --> 00:03:31,480 Speaker 1: before I turn up, so that when we spray the 55 00:03:31,560 --> 00:03:35,640 Speaker 1: rooms of blood, it looks pretty impressive. But I'm not Dexter, 56 00:03:35,840 --> 00:03:39,720 Speaker 1: So please don't you don't get worried about the fact 57 00:03:39,720 --> 00:03:41,840 Speaker 1: that I have to cover everything with plastic before. 58 00:03:43,400 --> 00:03:45,040 Speaker 2: Yeah, I don't know. I don't know if we have 59 00:03:45,120 --> 00:03:48,520 Speaker 2: that in common. I have people that will that will 60 00:03:48,560 --> 00:03:50,680 Speaker 2: approach me when they find out that I'm a forensic 61 00:03:50,720 --> 00:03:53,680 Speaker 2: scientist and they'll say, oh, you're just like Dexter. No, 62 00:03:54,360 --> 00:03:57,520 Speaker 2: I can assure you I'm not a serial killer. I've 63 00:03:57,640 --> 00:04:01,480 Speaker 2: worked on serial homicides, but I'm no serial killer. But yeah, 64 00:04:01,720 --> 00:04:06,160 Speaker 2: that's isn't that interesting Because the media, I think has 65 00:04:06,240 --> 00:04:11,800 Speaker 2: greatly influenced, particularly entertainment media, about their perception the general 66 00:04:11,800 --> 00:04:14,640 Speaker 2: public's perception of what it is that we do. And 67 00:04:14,680 --> 00:04:17,680 Speaker 2: I think for me at least, one of the kind 68 00:04:17,680 --> 00:04:20,839 Speaker 2: of insulting bits to this is that they will take 69 00:04:21,279 --> 00:04:26,280 Speaker 2: a fictionalized program and they will take one individual and 70 00:04:26,360 --> 00:04:30,760 Speaker 2: have them doing a job or have them doing multiple jobs, 71 00:04:30,800 --> 00:04:35,240 Speaker 2: where this individual is an expert in multiple fields. And 72 00:04:35,360 --> 00:04:39,360 Speaker 2: for us, we have talked about this earlier, I had 73 00:04:39,360 --> 00:04:42,360 Speaker 2: to do kind of a even after having a graduate 74 00:04:42,400 --> 00:04:44,680 Speaker 2: degree in forensic science, I had to do an apprenticeship 75 00:04:44,839 --> 00:04:48,440 Speaker 2: that lasted a protracted period of time. Would you say 76 00:04:48,480 --> 00:04:53,160 Speaker 2: that we are, in many ways like old fashioned crafts 77 00:04:53,160 --> 00:04:56,200 Speaker 2: people where a meal write or a cooper or even 78 00:04:56,200 --> 00:05:00,320 Speaker 2: a cobbler, where you have to demonstrate your effectiveness, you 79 00:05:00,400 --> 00:05:05,400 Speaker 2: have that encounter in your professional development. Yeah. 80 00:05:05,440 --> 00:05:07,800 Speaker 1: I mean, I've been doing this very well as a 81 00:05:07,800 --> 00:05:11,440 Speaker 1: forensic scientist. I've been doing forensic science for about thirty years, 82 00:05:11,760 --> 00:05:14,080 Speaker 1: and I always say that I'm only here because of 83 00:05:14,120 --> 00:05:16,760 Speaker 1: the people who taught me what to do, so, I 84 00:05:16,760 --> 00:05:19,160 Speaker 1: mean it's like standing on the shoulders of giants, right. 85 00:05:19,240 --> 00:05:23,279 Speaker 1: I have met some amazing and incredible forensic scientists throughout 86 00:05:23,320 --> 00:05:25,880 Speaker 1: my career, and I'm kind of a product of the 87 00:05:26,520 --> 00:05:29,560 Speaker 1: so you almost certainly don't just kind of get the 88 00:05:29,640 --> 00:05:32,160 Speaker 1: job on day one and you're out there doing it 89 00:05:32,160 --> 00:05:35,080 Speaker 1: on your own. You're very much supported through it. But 90 00:05:35,279 --> 00:05:37,880 Speaker 1: just on the TV program stuff, I want to say 91 00:05:37,920 --> 00:05:41,680 Speaker 1: that you are never going to get any criticism from 92 00:05:41,720 --> 00:05:44,919 Speaker 1: me for the way that forensic science is depicted on 93 00:05:45,000 --> 00:05:49,080 Speaker 1: the telling because I think that anything that gives accessibility 94 00:05:49,720 --> 00:05:52,720 Speaker 1: to the work that the professionals in our industry do 95 00:05:53,440 --> 00:05:57,800 Speaker 1: is a really important thing. And my journey started out 96 00:05:57,839 --> 00:06:00,920 Speaker 1: with a TV program. So I watched in Delible Evidence, 97 00:06:00,920 --> 00:06:03,520 Speaker 1: which everybody in the room is thinking, what the heck 98 00:06:03,680 --> 00:06:06,120 Speaker 1: is that, But it was in the eighties and I 99 00:06:06,160 --> 00:06:09,320 Speaker 1: watched it with my mom and it was about how 100 00:06:09,400 --> 00:06:12,760 Speaker 1: forensic science can solve crimes. And I said to my 101 00:06:12,880 --> 00:06:15,360 Speaker 1: mom at that moment, that is what I want to do. 102 00:06:15,520 --> 00:06:19,840 Speaker 1: And my entire educational journey was with the view of 103 00:06:19,920 --> 00:06:24,279 Speaker 1: becoming a forensic scientist. So people that watch Silent Witness, 104 00:06:24,440 --> 00:06:27,920 Speaker 1: people that watch CSI, people that watch dexter and if 105 00:06:27,920 --> 00:06:31,040 Speaker 1: they are kind of infected with that same bug, then 106 00:06:31,200 --> 00:06:33,240 Speaker 1: I am all for that and I will support them 107 00:06:33,400 --> 00:06:34,960 Speaker 1: every set of the way. 108 00:06:35,480 --> 00:06:39,880 Speaker 2: I have a question for you, Joe, were you a 109 00:06:39,960 --> 00:06:40,840 Speaker 2: nosy child? 110 00:06:42,240 --> 00:06:44,960 Speaker 1: How do you mean no? I really don't know how 111 00:06:45,000 --> 00:06:46,360 Speaker 1: to Did. 112 00:06:45,800 --> 00:06:48,800 Speaker 2: You want to peek behind the curtain? Because I have 113 00:06:48,880 --> 00:06:52,520 Speaker 2: to tell you, In forensics and investigations, I think some 114 00:06:52,560 --> 00:06:54,760 Speaker 2: of the best investigators are those of us that are 115 00:06:54,800 --> 00:06:58,400 Speaker 2: predisposed of seeing those things that other people might not 116 00:06:58,480 --> 00:07:02,559 Speaker 2: necessarily see and being able to evaluate what we've seen 117 00:07:02,680 --> 00:07:05,120 Speaker 2: and try to present that to the public at large. 118 00:07:06,000 --> 00:07:09,960 Speaker 2: I think that extends probably in the testimonial sense when 119 00:07:09,960 --> 00:07:13,679 Speaker 2: you're providing testimony, because you are a court qualified expert 120 00:07:13,960 --> 00:07:16,640 Speaker 2: and literally Joe is at the top of her game 121 00:07:17,560 --> 00:07:20,240 Speaker 2: in what she does here in the UK. She's recognized 122 00:07:20,800 --> 00:07:23,880 Speaker 2: in the UK, and I would say internationally as the 123 00:07:23,920 --> 00:07:26,440 Speaker 2: person that the go to person that you would want 124 00:07:26,480 --> 00:07:30,760 Speaker 2: to do bloodstain pattern analysis. So for you, I think 125 00:07:31,640 --> 00:07:35,920 Speaker 2: it's really difficult for someone that you're impaneled on a 126 00:07:36,000 --> 00:07:40,640 Speaker 2: jury to be able to understand those things that you've 127 00:07:40,880 --> 00:07:43,160 Speaker 2: and I'm going to this is a big grotesque to 128 00:07:43,280 --> 00:07:46,800 Speaker 2: forgive me, but when you've gone on to a scene, 129 00:07:47,480 --> 00:07:52,320 Speaker 2: how do you translate those things, the sites, the smells, 130 00:07:53,600 --> 00:07:58,760 Speaker 2: the ambient environmental temperature. How can you integrate that into 131 00:07:58,800 --> 00:08:04,240 Speaker 2: testimony and literally transport that jury that is so abstracted 132 00:08:04,280 --> 00:08:08,160 Speaker 2: from everything else and make it real for them. 133 00:08:08,240 --> 00:08:10,360 Speaker 1: Well, I guess there are two things to say to that. 134 00:08:10,400 --> 00:08:14,680 Speaker 1: One is that whenever you enter this industry, nobody ever 135 00:08:14,720 --> 00:08:16,640 Speaker 1: sits you down and says you are going to be 136 00:08:16,640 --> 00:08:19,960 Speaker 1: exposed to some of the most horrific and awful things 137 00:08:20,360 --> 00:08:23,120 Speaker 1: in the line of your work and you're just going 138 00:08:23,160 --> 00:08:25,160 Speaker 1: to have to get over that. So that's one thing. 139 00:08:25,600 --> 00:08:28,680 Speaker 1: But the second thing is that because my specialism is 140 00:08:28,760 --> 00:08:33,320 Speaker 1: woodstained at analysis specifically and looking at the narrative that 141 00:08:33,320 --> 00:08:37,280 Speaker 1: the blood can give to a scene, the way that 142 00:08:37,360 --> 00:08:40,240 Speaker 1: it can tell a story about people's last movements and 143 00:08:40,360 --> 00:08:45,400 Speaker 1: moments in life, then I can't avoid going to crime 144 00:08:45,480 --> 00:08:50,240 Speaker 1: scenes where there are or have been horrific injuries, people 145 00:08:50,240 --> 00:08:55,120 Speaker 1: have died, and the joy of the job for me 146 00:08:55,640 --> 00:09:00,480 Speaker 1: is looking at that horrific landscape and be able to 147 00:09:00,520 --> 00:09:06,040 Speaker 1: spot something within it that could potentially help investigators work 148 00:09:06,080 --> 00:09:09,440 Speaker 1: out what happened here on and did something really of 149 00:09:10,000 --> 00:09:12,920 Speaker 1: So as an example, you might have someone with really 150 00:09:13,040 --> 00:09:18,160 Speaker 1: urific injuries and the blood is around the space. But 151 00:09:18,240 --> 00:09:21,720 Speaker 1: if the offender has intied themselves and he's dripping blood 152 00:09:21,800 --> 00:09:26,240 Speaker 1: throughout that space through the context of their actions, that 153 00:09:26,360 --> 00:09:29,840 Speaker 1: dripped blood is actually the thing that you want to 154 00:09:29,880 --> 00:09:33,200 Speaker 1: focus in on and sample it, get DNA from it, 155 00:09:33,520 --> 00:09:36,640 Speaker 1: try and understand who else was here, because the other 156 00:09:36,760 --> 00:09:41,680 Speaker 1: narrative is obviously contextual, but it doesn't tell you who 157 00:09:41,960 --> 00:09:45,839 Speaker 1: was in this space at the time of death. And 158 00:09:45,880 --> 00:09:49,120 Speaker 1: that is see that blood snake. That analysis can be 159 00:09:49,240 --> 00:09:50,360 Speaker 1: give to an investigation. 160 00:09:52,280 --> 00:09:55,480 Speaker 2: I think one of the toughest parts of your profession 161 00:09:56,360 --> 00:09:59,720 Speaker 2: is that when you arrive at the scene, let's just 162 00:09:59,760 --> 00:10:03,600 Speaker 2: say it is some horrific homicide, you're not always going 163 00:10:03,679 --> 00:10:06,320 Speaker 2: to have the decedent at the scene. They may have 164 00:10:06,480 --> 00:10:11,679 Speaker 2: been in what we refer to as the perry mortem state, 165 00:10:11,760 --> 00:10:15,839 Speaker 2: where in they're headed toward the post mortem state where 166 00:10:15,920 --> 00:10:18,160 Speaker 2: they're taking their last breasts. They're going to be whisked 167 00:10:18,200 --> 00:10:22,040 Speaker 2: away to the hospital, and you don't have that concentric 168 00:10:22,400 --> 00:10:25,280 Speaker 2: advantage of having the body there and everything else extends 169 00:10:25,320 --> 00:10:27,760 Speaker 2: out from it. You might have a big blank space 170 00:10:28,160 --> 00:10:32,040 Speaker 2: where they were, and then you have this deposition of blood, 171 00:10:32,480 --> 00:10:34,839 Speaker 2: and that makes it quite difficult, doesn't. 172 00:10:35,080 --> 00:10:38,439 Speaker 1: That makes a huge difference because anybody that's done forensics 173 00:10:38,480 --> 00:10:40,760 Speaker 1: one oh one knows that the body is a crisis. 174 00:10:40,880 --> 00:10:43,600 Speaker 1: So as soon as you take that body away from 175 00:10:43,760 --> 00:10:47,079 Speaker 1: that space, then you're losing a huge amount of information 176 00:10:47,640 --> 00:10:52,840 Speaker 1: and everything around distribution pattern. You have to have context. 177 00:10:53,320 --> 00:10:55,439 Speaker 1: So if I take a photo prap, that would stain 178 00:10:55,920 --> 00:10:58,320 Speaker 1: ensure it to my grandma because you going to be like, 179 00:10:58,400 --> 00:11:01,160 Speaker 1: what the heck's that? Yeah, it doesn't have that context. 180 00:11:01,280 --> 00:11:03,760 Speaker 1: If you walk into a room and say, look at 181 00:11:03,760 --> 00:11:07,920 Speaker 1: that woodstream and where it seems in that space, suddenly 182 00:11:08,400 --> 00:11:12,080 Speaker 1: it enlivens everything. So it gives you that context so 183 00:11:12,120 --> 00:11:15,959 Speaker 1: that you can start to evaluate it much more meaningfully 184 00:11:16,080 --> 00:11:17,560 Speaker 1: in your context to view than. 185 00:11:17,559 --> 00:11:22,040 Speaker 2: Sit in you can. There's a quote that I hung 186 00:11:22,080 --> 00:11:26,360 Speaker 2: onto through my career and many of you don't know 187 00:11:26,440 --> 00:11:28,920 Speaker 2: this that are not familiar with my background, but I 188 00:11:29,120 --> 00:11:32,880 Speaker 2: was you guys don't actually have my occupation here in 189 00:11:33,440 --> 00:11:36,840 Speaker 2: the UK. But I'm a medical legal death investigator by trade. 190 00:11:36,880 --> 00:11:38,839 Speaker 2: So I worked for the Corner Service, and I was 191 00:11:38,880 --> 00:11:42,040 Speaker 2: an investigator for the Corner in New Orleans and then 192 00:11:42,200 --> 00:11:45,440 Speaker 2: they don't have Corners in Atlanta. I became a medical 193 00:11:45,480 --> 00:11:49,080 Speaker 2: examiner investigator there. And I read a book many years 194 00:11:49,080 --> 00:11:52,720 Speaker 2: ago called Corner at Large, written by doctor Tom Negucci, 195 00:11:53,320 --> 00:11:57,360 Speaker 2: and doctor Negucci was the chief medical examdler slash corner 196 00:11:57,360 --> 00:12:00,920 Speaker 2: for La. They actually referred to him as the corner 197 00:12:01,000 --> 00:12:05,559 Speaker 2: to the stars. And he did Belushi's death, Marilyn Monroe, 198 00:12:05,960 --> 00:12:09,240 Speaker 2: you name it. And he was famously involved in the 199 00:12:09,240 --> 00:12:12,960 Speaker 2: Tate La Bianca bos And he made an interesting statement. 200 00:12:13,480 --> 00:12:16,400 Speaker 2: He said that when he was a young practitioner, he 201 00:12:16,440 --> 00:12:18,640 Speaker 2: would go out to the scene, and because he was 202 00:12:18,640 --> 00:12:22,280 Speaker 2: a forensic topologist by trade, his eyes were immediately drawn 203 00:12:22,320 --> 00:12:26,080 Speaker 2: to the body, and of course the medical examiner would 204 00:12:26,120 --> 00:12:28,840 Speaker 2: not come out where they're not a body of the scene. 205 00:12:29,000 --> 00:12:32,320 Speaker 2: And he said that he soon learned that he was 206 00:12:32,400 --> 00:12:36,280 Speaker 2: being distracted by the body. So this was his practice. 207 00:12:37,080 --> 00:12:41,440 Speaker 2: Doctor Degucci stated that he became a better observer of 208 00:12:41,559 --> 00:12:45,720 Speaker 2: crime scenes. When he walked through the door, he would 209 00:12:45,720 --> 00:12:48,680 Speaker 2: have already said been told the bodies in the back room, 210 00:12:48,760 --> 00:12:50,800 Speaker 2: or the bodies in the living room or in the kitchen. 211 00:12:51,520 --> 00:12:55,040 Speaker 2: His eyes immediately went to the ceiling and he would 212 00:12:55,080 --> 00:12:59,760 Speaker 2: begin to inspect the ceiling. And therefore he opined that 213 00:12:59,800 --> 00:13:03,640 Speaker 2: he his attention was not wrong. Do you how do 214 00:13:03,640 --> 00:13:06,960 Speaker 2: you feel about that comment relative to what doctor Mapuci 215 00:13:07,080 --> 00:13:09,800 Speaker 2: are you ever? Have you ever been distracted by a 216 00:13:09,880 --> 00:13:13,160 Speaker 2: body at a scene because it's so horrific or something 217 00:13:13,200 --> 00:13:15,600 Speaker 2: so over the top and it's hard to get past it. 218 00:13:15,600 --> 00:13:17,840 Speaker 2: It's hard, you know, your humanity gets involved in if 219 00:13:17,880 --> 00:13:19,160 Speaker 2: it's important. 220 00:13:19,480 --> 00:13:22,840 Speaker 1: The thing is that I completely relate to that story 221 00:13:22,920 --> 00:13:26,360 Speaker 1: because I think that the devil is in the detail. 222 00:13:26,640 --> 00:13:30,000 Speaker 1: So when you have too much of something, it kind 223 00:13:30,040 --> 00:13:34,560 Speaker 1: of overwhelms your senses. So from a bloodstained perspective, I 224 00:13:34,640 --> 00:13:37,120 Speaker 1: always kind of go to the edge of it because 225 00:13:37,160 --> 00:13:39,679 Speaker 1: I think, well, all of this stuff here is kind 226 00:13:39,720 --> 00:13:43,880 Speaker 1: of distorted and difficult and complex. But when you get 227 00:13:43,920 --> 00:13:46,120 Speaker 1: to the edge of a pattern, it becomes much more 228 00:13:47,240 --> 00:13:50,840 Speaker 1: easy to break down. It becomes much more detailed from 229 00:13:50,840 --> 00:13:55,520 Speaker 1: the perspective of understanding how those bloodstains got there. And 230 00:13:56,000 --> 00:13:58,920 Speaker 1: the thing about the ceiling is if you bloodson somebody 231 00:13:59,000 --> 00:14:02,320 Speaker 1: to death really differently, and you swing a weapon like 232 00:14:02,360 --> 00:14:06,400 Speaker 1: a baseball back multiple times in that space, the thing 233 00:14:06,440 --> 00:14:08,720 Speaker 1: that happens is blood starts to collect on it, and 234 00:14:08,920 --> 00:14:13,160 Speaker 1: you start to flick and past that blood into the space, 235 00:14:13,559 --> 00:14:16,600 Speaker 1: and that blood stuff is going onto the ceiling. So 236 00:14:16,640 --> 00:14:19,120 Speaker 1: as soon as you find those droplets that have landed 237 00:14:19,160 --> 00:14:21,720 Speaker 1: on the ceiling, you can stand under them. You can 238 00:14:21,760 --> 00:14:25,680 Speaker 1: examine which direction they're traveling, and you can put yourself 239 00:14:25,760 --> 00:14:29,560 Speaker 1: in the exact spot the perpetrate to the standing when 240 00:14:29,600 --> 00:14:32,560 Speaker 1: they swung that weapon. And then you look down and 241 00:14:32,600 --> 00:14:35,080 Speaker 1: there's a footwear mark, and you look to the wall 242 00:14:35,120 --> 00:14:38,640 Speaker 1: where they've placed their hand to steady themselves, and suddenly 243 00:14:38,680 --> 00:14:42,720 Speaker 1: the forensic nest starts to absolutely come in around that 244 00:14:42,800 --> 00:14:46,480 Speaker 1: individual and you've gone, and they'll tell you what. There 245 00:14:46,560 --> 00:14:52,160 Speaker 1: is nothing better than a gottum in the forensic context, 246 00:14:52,360 --> 00:14:55,240 Speaker 1: as long as it's the right person right and you 247 00:14:55,240 --> 00:14:57,480 Speaker 1: can see the T shirt and wearing. So I am 248 00:14:57,600 --> 00:15:01,480 Speaker 1: very much fully aware of miscarriages justice, but you get 249 00:15:01,520 --> 00:15:04,840 Speaker 1: the right person, and there's no better feeling. From a 250 00:15:04,840 --> 00:15:05,840 Speaker 1: personal perspective. 251 00:15:06,640 --> 00:15:10,680 Speaker 2: I've always used the paint brush an analogy when you 252 00:15:10,800 --> 00:15:15,040 Speaker 2: begin to think about cast off, and my bride is 253 00:15:15,080 --> 00:15:17,840 Speaker 2: here with me, Kim, and she can testify to the 254 00:15:17,880 --> 00:15:20,760 Speaker 2: fact that I hate painting. I can't stand it, but 255 00:15:20,880 --> 00:15:22,840 Speaker 2: I do know this. If I take a paint brush, 256 00:15:22,920 --> 00:15:24,800 Speaker 2: dip it in a paint bucket, and flick it over 257 00:15:24,840 --> 00:15:28,640 Speaker 2: my shoulder, I'll get this kind of arcing deposition on 258 00:15:28,680 --> 00:15:32,240 Speaker 2: the ceiling or latterally this sort of thing cast on. Yeah, 259 00:15:32,280 --> 00:15:35,200 Speaker 2: and cast off is what you're talking about, because you know, 260 00:15:35,360 --> 00:15:39,000 Speaker 2: maybe if you're talking about a bludgeoning, you're not necessarily 261 00:15:39,360 --> 00:15:43,160 Speaker 2: it's generally going to take multiple strikes before the skin 262 00:15:43,320 --> 00:15:45,760 Speaker 2: is going to be eruptive or lacerated to the point 263 00:15:45,760 --> 00:15:49,080 Speaker 2: where you'll get a deposition on the instrument to transfer it. 264 00:15:49,520 --> 00:15:53,480 Speaker 2: So the more strikes you have involved, there's a higher 265 00:15:53,480 --> 00:15:56,600 Speaker 2: probability that you'll have the surface coverage of the instrument 266 00:15:56,640 --> 00:15:58,440 Speaker 2: and you can do it. But you know, a single 267 00:15:58,480 --> 00:16:01,240 Speaker 2: strike is not necessarily every time going to produce a 268 00:16:01,400 --> 00:16:05,760 Speaker 2: lacerated area, will blood will issue forth from. So when 269 00:16:05,760 --> 00:16:09,960 Speaker 2: you get multiple strikes on body and I'm using I'm 270 00:16:10,040 --> 00:16:14,960 Speaker 2: using bludgeoning in particular, here you can have all manner 271 00:16:15,000 --> 00:16:17,480 Speaker 2: of patterns. And here here's the crazy thing for me, 272 00:16:17,480 --> 00:16:21,400 Speaker 2: and I still have not been able to understand how 273 00:16:21,440 --> 00:16:26,120 Speaker 2: you guys do this. The deposition patterns, particularly when you're 274 00:16:26,120 --> 00:16:29,400 Speaker 2: talking about cast off, you can have these multiple arcs 275 00:16:29,400 --> 00:16:32,560 Speaker 2: that kind of crisscross because it's not in a static environment. 276 00:16:32,840 --> 00:16:35,960 Speaker 2: You've got people that are reacting to pain. Their pain 277 00:16:36,000 --> 00:16:39,960 Speaker 2: centers are firing, they're adjusting, the perpetrator is adjusting. So 278 00:16:40,120 --> 00:16:42,760 Speaker 2: you can have this kind of layering that goes on, 279 00:16:42,880 --> 00:16:43,200 Speaker 2: don't you. 280 00:16:43,640 --> 00:16:46,680 Speaker 1: Yeah. I mean the clue is in the title, it's 281 00:16:46,680 --> 00:16:49,520 Speaker 1: blood stained pattern analysis, right, So we need blood to 282 00:16:49,600 --> 00:16:52,960 Speaker 1: starts off on that journey. So if you hit into 283 00:16:53,000 --> 00:16:58,080 Speaker 1: something that isn't blood, staying, I'm not coming out. I'm 284 00:16:58,160 --> 00:17:02,400 Speaker 1: staying in bed are However, if you've got blood, then 285 00:17:02,440 --> 00:17:04,399 Speaker 1: of course you know that's going to tell us something 286 00:17:04,400 --> 00:17:08,680 Speaker 1: about what happened. But I mean, these spaces are chaotic, 287 00:17:08,840 --> 00:17:13,359 Speaker 1: they're distressing, their dynamic and all of that kind of 288 00:17:13,440 --> 00:17:17,280 Speaker 1: comes together to produce a distribution that some of it 289 00:17:17,320 --> 00:17:21,359 Speaker 1: will be very easily identified and interpreted, and some of 290 00:17:21,359 --> 00:17:23,480 Speaker 1: it will kind of be like, scratch your head, I 291 00:17:23,560 --> 00:17:26,000 Speaker 1: really don't know what's going on here. I mean, the 292 00:17:26,040 --> 00:17:27,840 Speaker 1: first thing that happens when you get to a crime 293 00:17:27,880 --> 00:17:31,080 Speaker 1: scene is you're usual briefed by someone at the door 294 00:17:31,400 --> 00:17:33,960 Speaker 1: in terms of when you go through there. This is 295 00:17:34,000 --> 00:17:36,840 Speaker 1: what we're kind of wanting from your visit, and you've 296 00:17:36,840 --> 00:17:39,320 Speaker 1: got to be careful because that information can bias you 297 00:17:39,400 --> 00:17:42,439 Speaker 1: in terms of where you look or where you start 298 00:17:42,480 --> 00:17:46,719 Speaker 1: your examination. But it's also very helpful to have that 299 00:17:46,800 --> 00:17:49,480 Speaker 1: because I once went to a scene where I'd spent 300 00:17:50,119 --> 00:17:52,879 Speaker 1: quite a long time actually looking around the kitchen in 301 00:17:52,920 --> 00:17:55,359 Speaker 1: the living room and thinking, wow, it's not a huge 302 00:17:55,359 --> 00:17:57,639 Speaker 1: amount of me and maybe we've very clean up or 303 00:17:57,680 --> 00:18:00,600 Speaker 1: something like that, and then the crime scene manager came 304 00:18:00,640 --> 00:18:04,639 Speaker 1: to me and said, Joe, the scenes in the bedroom upstairs, 305 00:18:05,119 --> 00:18:08,719 Speaker 1: and I was like, oh, wow, well nothing here, and 306 00:18:08,760 --> 00:18:11,280 Speaker 1: then I walked up the stairs and got only in 307 00:18:11,400 --> 00:18:13,840 Speaker 1: my job. But you know, in the in the time 308 00:18:13,920 --> 00:18:15,960 Speaker 1: of like budgets and things like that, they don't want 309 00:18:16,000 --> 00:18:18,320 Speaker 1: you to be wasting the time and the kitchen in the room. 310 00:18:32,640 --> 00:18:35,119 Speaker 2: This is my praise with the UK. One of the 311 00:18:35,200 --> 00:18:38,160 Speaker 2: things that I thoroughly love about your practice is that 312 00:18:38,800 --> 00:18:42,240 Speaker 2: in America, if we have if we have even the 313 00:18:42,280 --> 00:18:49,120 Speaker 2: most grotesque commicide, maybe even a multiple death event, we're 314 00:18:49,200 --> 00:18:52,200 Speaker 2: kind of in and out in a very short amount 315 00:18:52,240 --> 00:18:57,120 Speaker 2: of time compared to you guys here. You guys, I've 316 00:18:57,160 --> 00:18:59,080 Speaker 2: seen it on the news, So maybe you can verify 317 00:18:59,119 --> 00:19:01,119 Speaker 2: this from me, because we know that not everything in 318 00:19:01,119 --> 00:19:05,280 Speaker 2: the news to ACCURENT. But with that said, you guys, 319 00:19:05,400 --> 00:19:08,160 Speaker 2: it's not uncommon for you guys to maybe lock down 320 00:19:08,520 --> 00:19:11,359 Speaker 2: an active scene for three or four days, and you 321 00:19:11,400 --> 00:19:13,800 Speaker 2: will take your time and go through that space, right. 322 00:19:14,359 --> 00:19:17,520 Speaker 1: Yeah, I mean the whole scene space is a journey, 323 00:19:17,560 --> 00:19:20,639 Speaker 1: so not everybody using it in at one time, so 324 00:19:20,880 --> 00:19:23,120 Speaker 1: you know, you have the first responders, and then that 325 00:19:23,200 --> 00:19:26,440 Speaker 1: turns into the crime scene teams, and then everything has 326 00:19:26,480 --> 00:19:30,000 Speaker 1: a method behind it. So yeah, sometimes we can be 327 00:19:30,000 --> 00:19:32,640 Speaker 1: in the scenes for days, you know, I mean, there's 328 00:19:32,720 --> 00:19:35,480 Speaker 1: nothing's going anywhere, right, so you don't want to trample 329 00:19:35,520 --> 00:19:38,480 Speaker 1: over it and mess it up. Yeah. Even anything I 330 00:19:38,600 --> 00:19:42,199 Speaker 1: do has to have an eye on who's coming in 331 00:19:42,240 --> 00:19:44,639 Speaker 1: this space next, and I don't want to mess it 332 00:19:44,720 --> 00:19:48,760 Speaker 1: up for them. So everything has a process around it. 333 00:19:49,119 --> 00:19:51,399 Speaker 1: And yet there'll be some cases where we have to 334 00:19:51,440 --> 00:19:54,000 Speaker 1: go in really quickly and get out really quickly, and 335 00:19:54,040 --> 00:19:57,040 Speaker 1: that might be because of various factors. As an example, 336 00:19:57,400 --> 00:19:59,719 Speaker 1: if somebody has died in an ambulance, we don't want 337 00:19:59,760 --> 00:20:03,080 Speaker 1: to be taking that vehicle out of commission for any 338 00:20:03,119 --> 00:20:06,480 Speaker 1: longer than is absolutely necessary. So we'll go in, we'll 339 00:20:06,520 --> 00:20:08,600 Speaker 1: triarge you, we'll get what we need, will come out, 340 00:20:08,640 --> 00:20:11,879 Speaker 1: We'll get that thing back into doing the job that 341 00:20:11,920 --> 00:20:15,000 Speaker 1: it needs to do. But everything is a learning curve. 342 00:20:15,080 --> 00:20:17,920 Speaker 1: I mean, I've been in and out of Lords of 343 00:20:17,960 --> 00:20:21,480 Speaker 1: Crime scenes and I have never seen the same thing twice. 344 00:20:21,840 --> 00:20:26,560 Speaker 1: I think that the moment you stop learning or open 345 00:20:26,680 --> 00:20:30,320 Speaker 1: to the suggestion that this might be different, I think 346 00:20:30,359 --> 00:20:32,720 Speaker 1: that's the time to hang up the scene. 347 00:20:32,800 --> 00:20:38,400 Speaker 2: So frankly, I think my baseline anytime that I hear 348 00:20:38,560 --> 00:20:46,199 Speaker 2: someone say that they have seen everything, I run not 349 00:20:46,359 --> 00:20:51,240 Speaker 2: walk away from that individual, because it's impossible. I've learned people. 350 00:20:51,520 --> 00:20:54,040 Speaker 2: I've learned from people that have worked in rural spaces. 351 00:20:54,160 --> 00:20:58,199 Speaker 2: I've worked in urban, very densely populated urban areas, and 352 00:20:58,400 --> 00:21:02,040 Speaker 2: I can't identify with a farm accident or homicide was committed, 353 00:21:03,000 --> 00:21:06,720 Speaker 2: you know, at a you know, at a vineyard somewhere, 354 00:21:07,040 --> 00:21:11,479 Speaker 2: because I don't understand that space. So just because you know, 355 00:21:12,359 --> 00:21:15,040 Speaker 2: I've worked in a high volume area. We had this 356 00:21:15,080 --> 00:21:18,560 Speaker 2: discussion area earlier. Just because I've worked in a high 357 00:21:18,680 --> 00:21:21,399 Speaker 2: volume area, have worked in a high volume area, doesn't 358 00:21:21,400 --> 00:21:24,400 Speaker 2: necessarily mean that I know everything, And it's very arrogant 359 00:21:24,440 --> 00:21:28,800 Speaker 2: to do that. You every every scene is a learning opportunity, 360 00:21:28,840 --> 00:21:29,600 Speaker 2: would you agree with? 361 00:21:31,320 --> 00:21:34,560 Speaker 1: And anybody that is on my pook quiz te will 362 00:21:34,640 --> 00:21:39,200 Speaker 1: know I don't know nothing, So let's just get that 363 00:21:39,240 --> 00:21:43,480 Speaker 1: into concepts. Because the thing is, and this is this 364 00:21:43,600 --> 00:21:46,280 Speaker 1: is going to sound really awful, and I'm embarrassed to 365 00:21:46,320 --> 00:21:51,240 Speaker 1: say it, frankly, but because there was such weird kid 366 00:21:51,400 --> 00:21:55,080 Speaker 1: and also really wanted to be a forensic scientist, all 367 00:21:55,119 --> 00:21:57,800 Speaker 1: of my decisions in my education were based on that. 368 00:21:57,960 --> 00:22:01,040 Speaker 1: So all the humanities kind of went out the window. 369 00:22:01,359 --> 00:22:04,520 Speaker 1: I'm really bad at geography. Please don't ask me anything 370 00:22:04,560 --> 00:22:07,719 Speaker 1: about history, you know, things like that trivial pursuit. I 371 00:22:07,760 --> 00:22:12,239 Speaker 1: am like science questions, yeah, yeah, and and and that 372 00:22:12,320 --> 00:22:16,479 Speaker 1: kind of limits your understanding. But now, because I'm older 373 00:22:16,480 --> 00:22:18,920 Speaker 1: and I'm hopefully much more wiser, I'm kind of trying 374 00:22:18,920 --> 00:22:21,760 Speaker 1: to fill in the gaps from missing out of that. 375 00:22:21,920 --> 00:22:23,840 Speaker 1: But You're absolutely right. 376 00:22:24,880 --> 00:22:28,040 Speaker 2: I was hoping if you could give us a brief primer, 377 00:22:29,280 --> 00:22:35,359 Speaker 2: brief primer on velocity, just so that people, because I 378 00:22:35,440 --> 00:22:38,040 Speaker 2: know that kind of the coin of the realm, if 379 00:22:38,080 --> 00:22:40,760 Speaker 2: you will. One of the things that you're you're asked 380 00:22:40,800 --> 00:22:46,560 Speaker 2: to interpret is with blood deposition. You know, there's a couple, 381 00:22:46,600 --> 00:22:48,160 Speaker 2: there's this is multi prong. 382 00:22:48,600 --> 00:22:52,680 Speaker 1: How the myth bush you already the mythus really yeah, 383 00:22:53,400 --> 00:22:56,439 Speaker 1: because are you using velocity in the context of blood. 384 00:22:57,320 --> 00:22:59,240 Speaker 2: Yes, okay. 385 00:23:00,240 --> 00:23:03,600 Speaker 1: So the thing is that we can't define blood patterns 386 00:23:03,640 --> 00:23:06,920 Speaker 1: on the basis of velocity. So velocity is speed, right, 387 00:23:07,280 --> 00:23:11,400 Speaker 1: it's mass time something. Does anybody have Google with them 388 00:23:13,800 --> 00:23:17,160 Speaker 1: because that is extremely helpful in these situations when you're 389 00:23:17,520 --> 00:23:25,280 Speaker 1: spot for velosity equation. Never mind, So the vast majority 390 00:23:25,560 --> 00:23:30,879 Speaker 1: of definitions around bloodstained pattern analysis were based on velocity. 391 00:23:31,080 --> 00:23:34,280 Speaker 1: We have high velocity impact, we had medium velocity impact, 392 00:23:34,320 --> 00:23:37,399 Speaker 1: we had low velost the impact and everybody went around 393 00:23:37,400 --> 00:23:41,879 Speaker 1: for about twenty thirty years thinking wow, that sounded really cool. 394 00:23:42,440 --> 00:23:45,639 Speaker 1: And the reason why it was defined around velocity was 395 00:23:45,680 --> 00:23:49,720 Speaker 1: because the majority of initial research was based on gun 396 00:23:49,760 --> 00:23:55,320 Speaker 1: shot situations. We shot stuff, and dare I say most 397 00:23:55,359 --> 00:23:58,840 Speaker 1: of that research came out from the state. I always 398 00:23:58,840 --> 00:24:03,040 Speaker 1: say in the UK that if we come across a 399 00:24:03,080 --> 00:24:05,960 Speaker 1: gun in the UK, we usually bludgeon somebody to death 400 00:24:06,000 --> 00:24:09,440 Speaker 1: with it because we literally don't have the same level 401 00:24:09,480 --> 00:24:14,679 Speaker 1: of gun crime and gun accessibility as So all this 402 00:24:14,840 --> 00:24:19,200 Speaker 1: initial research we had load in various forms and various devices, 403 00:24:19,440 --> 00:24:22,119 Speaker 1: and we shot it and people looked at the pattern 404 00:24:22,160 --> 00:24:24,560 Speaker 1: and said, wow, I've just shot that with a high 405 00:24:24,680 --> 00:24:27,720 Speaker 1: losty weapon. That is a high losty impact pattern. And 406 00:24:27,800 --> 00:24:32,479 Speaker 1: the problem is it defines the pattern based on the weapon. 407 00:24:33,880 --> 00:24:36,200 Speaker 1: If I go into a crime scene, I cannot look 408 00:24:36,240 --> 00:24:41,199 Speaker 1: at an impact pattern that's and say, wow, look at that, 409 00:24:41,200 --> 00:24:44,600 Speaker 1: that's a baseball back, or wow, look at that that's 410 00:24:44,880 --> 00:24:47,960 Speaker 1: a punching. The pattern is the pattern. It has its 411 00:24:47,960 --> 00:24:50,480 Speaker 1: own features. And so now we need to turn away 412 00:24:50,920 --> 00:24:54,280 Speaker 1: from the losty definitions and move towards what is the 413 00:24:54,400 --> 00:24:57,800 Speaker 1: range of stain sizes within that pattern, and from that 414 00:24:57,880 --> 00:25:02,000 Speaker 1: we can then understand the energy the force, and now 415 00:25:02,119 --> 00:25:05,040 Speaker 1: we can start to talk about the activities that caused 416 00:25:05,080 --> 00:25:08,479 Speaker 1: that to be produced. So I'm really sorry to like 417 00:25:08,600 --> 00:25:11,520 Speaker 1: misbus the thing, but I'm going to google what velocity is. 418 00:25:11,600 --> 00:25:13,879 Speaker 2: Thank you very much. I will no, I want to 419 00:25:13,880 --> 00:25:16,359 Speaker 2: give you I'm glad that you mentioned this, and that's 420 00:25:16,640 --> 00:25:19,480 Speaker 2: kind of why I wanted that trap to be set 421 00:25:19,520 --> 00:25:24,040 Speaker 2: for myself. Really, yes, absolutely, And let me give you 422 00:25:24,080 --> 00:25:28,439 Speaker 2: an example. There's an infamous case in America that's referred 423 00:25:28,440 --> 00:25:31,919 Speaker 2: to as the Jody Aria's case. I don't know if 424 00:25:31,960 --> 00:25:33,520 Speaker 2: you guys are familiar with that. I've covered in the 425 00:25:33,560 --> 00:25:37,320 Speaker 2: media for years and years. When you take a look 426 00:25:37,600 --> 00:25:40,680 Speaker 2: at the Jody Arias case, this is started out as 427 00:25:40,680 --> 00:25:43,720 Speaker 2: a stabbing of a man that was in shower and 428 00:25:44,119 --> 00:25:47,520 Speaker 2: he stabbed multiple times in the back by his girlfriend. 429 00:25:48,440 --> 00:25:51,160 Speaker 2: She clipped one of his lungs. He's aware that he's 430 00:25:51,200 --> 00:25:55,399 Speaker 2: being stabbed, and you can see it by virtue of 431 00:25:55,440 --> 00:26:03,280 Speaker 2: the low velocity dripping that's going on. But he walks 432 00:26:03,280 --> 00:26:07,320 Speaker 2: over to the sink in the bathroom and he places 433 00:26:07,359 --> 00:26:11,440 Speaker 2: his hands on both sides of the sink, and she's 434 00:26:11,440 --> 00:26:15,040 Speaker 2: clipped as long. If you were to look at the 435 00:26:15,080 --> 00:26:20,680 Speaker 2: mirror that he was staring into as he's trying to breathe, 436 00:26:20,880 --> 00:26:26,520 Speaker 2: in the area around the sink, there is fine aspirt 437 00:26:28,040 --> 00:26:30,680 Speaker 2: blood droplets that are everywhere, And if you were looking 438 00:26:30,720 --> 00:26:33,119 Speaker 2: at this just blindly, he would say, well, that looks 439 00:26:33,160 --> 00:26:41,240 Speaker 2: like high veloscity blood deposition. But he is literally he's 440 00:26:41,280 --> 00:26:44,480 Speaker 2: coughing this up and it's disguised, you know. When you 441 00:26:44,640 --> 00:26:47,560 Speaker 2: and she did finally the coup de graze, they say 442 00:26:47,680 --> 00:26:50,239 Speaker 2: she shot him at the end of all of this, 443 00:26:50,320 --> 00:26:55,200 Speaker 2: after she stabbed him in the double digits, he's crawling 444 00:26:55,240 --> 00:26:58,760 Speaker 2: down the hallway. She finally stands over him, cuts his 445 00:26:58,840 --> 00:27:02,840 Speaker 2: throat and too out a small caliber weapon and shoots 446 00:27:02,920 --> 00:27:07,760 Speaker 2: on the left aspect of the head and it tracks 447 00:27:07,760 --> 00:27:11,320 Speaker 2: from here behind his eye and exits right here. There's 448 00:27:11,359 --> 00:27:13,640 Speaker 2: no hemorrhage in the one, so it's a post warm 449 00:27:13,720 --> 00:27:17,199 Speaker 2: bench out one. But if you were just looking at 450 00:27:17,240 --> 00:27:21,040 Speaker 2: that with that fine deposition, you might say that that 451 00:27:21,280 --> 00:27:22,240 Speaker 2: is high velocity. 452 00:27:23,160 --> 00:27:27,920 Speaker 1: So the features of that blood will have some unique characteristics. 453 00:27:28,000 --> 00:27:31,720 Speaker 1: Because when we mix blood with something else, as an example, 454 00:27:31,920 --> 00:27:36,280 Speaker 1: air or lungs of fact or saliva or anything that 455 00:27:36,440 --> 00:27:39,800 Speaker 1: isn't meant to be mixed with blood red wine as 456 00:27:39,800 --> 00:27:43,720 Speaker 1: an example, then it changes what the blood looks like. 457 00:27:44,320 --> 00:27:47,399 Speaker 1: And we can then start to look at that in 458 00:27:47,560 --> 00:27:50,320 Speaker 1: real detail to understand is that color change due to 459 00:27:50,400 --> 00:27:53,240 Speaker 1: it be mixed with something So in that particular case, 460 00:27:53,520 --> 00:27:56,000 Speaker 1: expiated blood as we would call it, but asked for 461 00:27:56,119 --> 00:27:58,760 Speaker 1: it as you like all many feed then we can 462 00:27:58,880 --> 00:28:01,000 Speaker 1: have a look at the real fire features. And that's 463 00:28:01,040 --> 00:28:02,800 Speaker 1: not to say I can just take a photograph and 464 00:28:02,880 --> 00:28:05,000 Speaker 1: that's my job. Done. Have to get on your hands 465 00:28:05,040 --> 00:28:07,080 Speaker 1: and knees and have a look at the detail. And 466 00:28:07,280 --> 00:28:11,520 Speaker 1: because it's mixed with lungs effactant potentially air as an example, 467 00:28:12,000 --> 00:28:13,959 Speaker 1: it might have little air bubbles in it. It might 468 00:28:14,119 --> 00:28:17,720 Speaker 1: look like an aero kind of consistency. It might have 469 00:28:17,840 --> 00:28:20,800 Speaker 1: a dilution in it. It might have what we call springing, 470 00:28:20,880 --> 00:28:24,400 Speaker 1: which is where little droplets of blood can't disconnect from 471 00:28:24,440 --> 00:28:28,000 Speaker 1: others and they have this connection between spots of blood, 472 00:28:28,359 --> 00:28:31,159 Speaker 1: and that's because it's become more sticky, it can't do 473 00:28:31,280 --> 00:28:34,080 Speaker 1: what it likes to do. And then we can use 474 00:28:34,200 --> 00:28:36,640 Speaker 1: all of those features one after the other to say 475 00:28:36,760 --> 00:28:40,800 Speaker 1: this is just normal unadulted blood. Something's happening to it. 476 00:28:40,960 --> 00:28:44,120 Speaker 1: As an example explorator and by the way, I find 477 00:28:44,160 --> 00:28:46,960 Speaker 1: this a little segue into other stuff that we're doing 478 00:28:47,040 --> 00:28:49,840 Speaker 1: over the weekend. But if we put a little bit 479 00:28:49,920 --> 00:28:52,840 Speaker 1: of this training with a little bit of the blood 480 00:28:52,880 --> 00:28:56,080 Speaker 1: training that you might get in the US like Justice event, 481 00:28:56,480 --> 00:28:59,120 Speaker 1: with the other training that's happened in this afternoon at 482 00:28:59,160 --> 00:29:02,760 Speaker 1: the session on stay impact analysis, you can put that 483 00:29:02,880 --> 00:29:05,720 Speaker 1: all together. It's like a mini training. Cost Come and 484 00:29:05,800 --> 00:29:09,240 Speaker 1: find me and I'll light your certificate because seriously. 485 00:29:09,200 --> 00:29:11,360 Speaker 2: You're you're going to be credentialed after this. 486 00:29:11,920 --> 00:29:14,640 Speaker 1: You're literally going to get like a doctor or say hey, 487 00:29:14,720 --> 00:29:16,040 Speaker 1: there you go, there you go. 488 00:29:30,080 --> 00:29:33,000 Speaker 2: Can you talk a little bit about well, here's a 489 00:29:33,120 --> 00:29:38,440 Speaker 2: question that many people ask. Is it possible to lift 490 00:29:38,840 --> 00:29:42,080 Speaker 2: or where you can identify, but is it possible to 491 00:29:42,360 --> 00:29:48,480 Speaker 2: identify specific features relative to a fingerprint or handprint in 492 00:29:48,960 --> 00:29:51,800 Speaker 2: in blood, and can you kind of explain that process 493 00:29:51,880 --> 00:29:52,520 Speaker 2: today morning? 494 00:29:53,200 --> 00:29:56,160 Speaker 1: Yes, So, I mean everybody knows about fingerprints. That's not 495 00:29:56,320 --> 00:29:58,480 Speaker 1: my area, but I have seen a lot of marks 496 00:29:58,520 --> 00:30:00,840 Speaker 1: in blood over my time. But the thing about a 497 00:30:00,960 --> 00:30:04,520 Speaker 1: fingerprint is it's something that we can use to identify people. 498 00:30:05,160 --> 00:30:07,600 Speaker 1: Put that fingerprint in the blood of the victim, and 499 00:30:07,760 --> 00:30:11,280 Speaker 1: you've got yourself for the golden ticket, because it demonstrates 500 00:30:11,360 --> 00:30:15,120 Speaker 1: potentially that that individual is in that space when the 501 00:30:15,160 --> 00:30:17,840 Speaker 1: blood of the victim was a vent and is placed 502 00:30:17,920 --> 00:30:21,120 Speaker 1: down marks on stuff. So it kind of it's got 503 00:30:21,240 --> 00:30:23,760 Speaker 1: like a time check to it, and it could be 504 00:30:23,920 --> 00:30:28,840 Speaker 1: used really powerfully in the context of crime. I had 505 00:30:28,880 --> 00:30:31,600 Speaker 1: a case a number of years ago now, but the 506 00:30:32,440 --> 00:30:36,080 Speaker 1: offender has used the blood of his victim and written 507 00:30:36,120 --> 00:30:39,600 Speaker 1: a really horrible word on the wall of the crime 508 00:30:39,680 --> 00:30:45,080 Speaker 1: scene and finished it off to the next exclamation point. Well, 509 00:30:45,200 --> 00:30:48,600 Speaker 1: I'm sorry, but you don't get any prizes if you're stupid, right, 510 00:30:48,760 --> 00:30:52,080 Speaker 1: So here you went to jail. Directly to jail is 511 00:30:52,160 --> 00:30:54,560 Speaker 1: that these are things that happen in the commission of 512 00:30:54,640 --> 00:30:57,480 Speaker 1: these events that people aren't really thinking you can do 513 00:30:57,640 --> 00:31:00,840 Speaker 1: all the planning in the world, but you get cross, 514 00:31:01,240 --> 00:31:04,800 Speaker 1: you get angry, things get out of control, and suddenly 515 00:31:05,240 --> 00:31:07,200 Speaker 1: you put in a really all the world and all 516 00:31:07,240 --> 00:31:10,400 Speaker 1: the under printing it. So that's that's your bad. 517 00:31:10,760 --> 00:31:14,440 Speaker 2: Yeah. We we were just speaking earlier about our colleagues 518 00:31:14,520 --> 00:31:19,640 Speaker 2: that are involved in forensic document examination, and you know, 519 00:31:19,720 --> 00:31:22,600 Speaker 2: there's not not too many of those folks around anymore. 520 00:31:23,120 --> 00:31:26,920 Speaker 2: But when you think about someone writing in blood, and 521 00:31:27,080 --> 00:31:30,520 Speaker 2: going back to Naguchi earlier, he was at you know, 522 00:31:30,760 --> 00:31:35,400 Speaker 2: the Tate Labanca. You know famously the word pig was 523 00:31:35,440 --> 00:31:39,160 Speaker 2: written on the wall, and of course blood was the medium. 524 00:31:39,320 --> 00:31:41,120 Speaker 2: You know that that was written in, and you begin 525 00:31:41,240 --> 00:31:44,040 Speaker 2: to think about that, is that actually something that has 526 00:31:44,280 --> 00:31:46,640 Speaker 2: occurred with some level of frequency. 527 00:31:46,160 --> 00:31:49,120 Speaker 1: In your practice in terms of people writing. 528 00:31:48,960 --> 00:31:49,880 Speaker 2: Writing in blood? 529 00:31:49,960 --> 00:31:52,160 Speaker 1: I mean, I won't say it's a common occurrence, but 530 00:31:52,280 --> 00:31:55,000 Speaker 1: when it happens, of course, it's going to be really important. 531 00:31:55,200 --> 00:31:58,720 Speaker 1: Usually people are just moving blood around because they're stained, 532 00:31:58,840 --> 00:32:02,600 Speaker 1: and they're bumping into things and touching things. You can 533 00:32:02,680 --> 00:32:05,520 Speaker 1: sort of follow their tracks. Really. I once knew that 534 00:32:05,640 --> 00:32:08,880 Speaker 1: someone had put a CD in their CD player, and 535 00:32:08,960 --> 00:32:11,360 Speaker 1: I could tell the song that they played on the 536 00:32:11,480 --> 00:32:15,040 Speaker 1: CD in wood stages that they found on Wi Fi. 537 00:32:15,640 --> 00:32:18,720 Speaker 1: We call it how quite a lot. I just literally 538 00:32:19,080 --> 00:32:24,200 Speaker 1: realize that, I'm so do they even exist anymore? 539 00:32:24,200 --> 00:32:24,760 Speaker 2: I'm not sure. 540 00:32:25,360 --> 00:32:30,560 Speaker 1: I'm really sorry about that. But anyway, but sometimes there's 541 00:32:30,560 --> 00:32:32,880 Speaker 1: a detail in there that you think, wow, you know, 542 00:32:33,080 --> 00:32:36,120 Speaker 1: I mean, anybody else wouldn't necessarily see it, but it's 543 00:32:36,200 --> 00:32:38,960 Speaker 1: such an important detail, and you know, it could be 544 00:32:39,040 --> 00:32:41,280 Speaker 1: really important in the context of the investigation. 545 00:32:41,720 --> 00:32:46,160 Speaker 2: Who knows Joe right right now? I would first like 546 00:32:46,240 --> 00:32:49,400 Speaker 2: for you, if you don't mind, please expand a little 547 00:32:49,440 --> 00:32:54,840 Speaker 2: bit for us on the Inside Justice program that you're 548 00:32:54,880 --> 00:32:57,520 Speaker 2: involved with and kind of talk talk to that and 549 00:32:57,640 --> 00:33:01,200 Speaker 2: about those that in many cases have been wrongly accused 550 00:33:01,240 --> 00:33:02,920 Speaker 2: and what do you bring, what do you bring to 551 00:33:03,000 --> 00:33:04,520 Speaker 2: the table your expertise please? 552 00:33:05,120 --> 00:33:09,120 Speaker 1: Yeah. So Inside Justice is a charity in UK, charity 553 00:33:09,200 --> 00:33:15,200 Speaker 1: which is it's kind of it's a multifaceted charity, but 554 00:33:15,640 --> 00:33:20,240 Speaker 1: the main objective is to help people who have been 555 00:33:20,320 --> 00:33:24,080 Speaker 1: subject to an alleged miscarriage of justice and we do 556 00:33:24,280 --> 00:33:29,640 Speaker 1: that through donation obviously, but we uniquely have an advisory 557 00:33:29,760 --> 00:33:33,320 Speaker 1: panel and if anybody has seen the programs on Netflix 558 00:33:33,400 --> 00:33:37,800 Speaker 1: Conviction Murder at the station murdering Suburbia. They are about 559 00:33:37,920 --> 00:33:40,600 Speaker 1: this charity. I've been working with them for a number 560 00:33:40,640 --> 00:33:43,040 Speaker 1: of years. I can't remember how I got involved, but 561 00:33:43,200 --> 00:33:46,800 Speaker 1: somebody probably said will you do anything for free? And 562 00:33:46,960 --> 00:33:51,000 Speaker 1: I said sure, And then probably ten years later, here 563 00:33:51,040 --> 00:33:54,280 Speaker 1: we are at crime con But you can meet them all. 564 00:33:54,360 --> 00:33:57,760 Speaker 1: Actually they're just outside the room. We're doing their fingerprint queuing. 565 00:33:57,840 --> 00:34:01,120 Speaker 1: So canqutment fingerprint and queuing be unique to you that 566 00:34:01,240 --> 00:34:04,960 Speaker 1: the donation? Thanks very much, But a charity is such 567 00:34:05,000 --> 00:34:09,600 Speaker 1: a rich seam of expertise because the advisory panel is 568 00:34:09,880 --> 00:34:15,239 Speaker 1: based of legal experts, forensic scientists like me, people from 569 00:34:15,560 --> 00:34:20,480 Speaker 1: a full gamut of industry who are all swimming in 570 00:34:20,600 --> 00:34:24,920 Speaker 1: the same direction to ensure that a miscarriages are corrected, 571 00:34:25,520 --> 00:34:28,760 Speaker 1: but also to drive systemic change so that we don't 572 00:34:29,760 --> 00:34:33,040 Speaker 1: have miscarriages of justice. You know that when I started 573 00:34:33,080 --> 00:34:36,200 Speaker 1: my career, we didn't have DNA profiling, right, So change 574 00:34:36,320 --> 00:34:39,640 Speaker 1: can happen. We have to get into a place where 575 00:34:39,800 --> 00:34:43,839 Speaker 1: miscarriages of justice do not happen, because apart from them 576 00:34:43,880 --> 00:34:47,120 Speaker 1: putting the wrong person in prison, that's one thing, but 577 00:34:47,280 --> 00:34:50,520 Speaker 1: it means that the wrong person is out in the community. 578 00:34:51,120 --> 00:34:53,400 Speaker 1: And I think that we really need to shift our 579 00:34:53,520 --> 00:34:57,839 Speaker 1: thinking on the reliability the robustness of our criminal justice 580 00:34:57,880 --> 00:35:02,359 Speaker 1: system and really challenge these decisions that put the wrong 581 00:35:02,560 --> 00:35:06,040 Speaker 1: person in prison, and just on that there is we're 582 00:35:06,120 --> 00:35:10,160 Speaker 1: running a session on repeat essentially throughout the weekend, which 583 00:35:10,280 --> 00:35:12,480 Speaker 1: is I think next Door. So if you get chance, 584 00:35:12,960 --> 00:35:15,479 Speaker 1: please book yourself into that session and we can talk 585 00:35:15,680 --> 00:35:19,440 Speaker 1: through it's based on a real case, and we can 586 00:35:19,520 --> 00:35:22,440 Speaker 1: talk you through the forensic signs that was used in 587 00:35:22,480 --> 00:35:23,319 Speaker 1: an investigation. 588 00:35:24,680 --> 00:35:27,800 Speaker 2: One other thing, if you're wanting to get credential, you 589 00:35:27,880 --> 00:35:29,880 Speaker 2: said that you would credential. Now you're going to give 590 00:35:29,920 --> 00:35:33,359 Speaker 2: them certific she said it here like that certificate. If 591 00:35:33,520 --> 00:35:37,840 Speaker 2: we are away, you are housed in an event And 592 00:35:38,040 --> 00:35:40,960 Speaker 2: in just a bit I think today roughly three ish 593 00:35:41,040 --> 00:35:42,160 Speaker 2: three twenty five at that time. 594 00:35:42,400 --> 00:35:46,640 Speaker 1: Yeah, the brilliant people at True Crime are allowing me 595 00:35:46,800 --> 00:35:50,840 Speaker 1: to talk even more about blood, bloodstains. What is going on? 596 00:35:51,080 --> 00:35:55,120 Speaker 1: So three something or other I think exhibit A three 597 00:35:55,239 --> 00:35:59,799 Speaker 1: twenty five, I believe we'll be talking about bloodstain patent analysis. 598 00:36:00,080 --> 00:36:03,640 Speaker 1: Come along to that hopefully. And in fact, this week 599 00:36:04,239 --> 00:36:07,640 Speaker 1: they're launching Murder Murdered by the Sea, which is I 600 00:36:07,760 --> 00:36:10,960 Speaker 1: think the third season of that which again deals with 601 00:36:11,080 --> 00:36:14,719 Speaker 1: some of the bloodstains that we're encountered in cases. So 602 00:36:15,360 --> 00:36:17,879 Speaker 1: if you're not fed up with me by now, then 603 00:36:17,960 --> 00:36:20,920 Speaker 1: please inside Justice next door and then we'll see you 604 00:36:21,000 --> 00:36:22,279 Speaker 1: in an exhibit a later on. 605 00:36:23,320 --> 00:36:25,520 Speaker 2: You're going to be doing anything about velocity over there, 606 00:36:25,640 --> 00:36:26,480 Speaker 2: I'm just curious. 607 00:36:27,640 --> 00:36:30,520 Speaker 1: I'm literally going to be lived in for this Microsoft, and. 608 00:36:33,320 --> 00:36:36,920 Speaker 2: We'll use paint into it. We'll have a. 609 00:36:37,000 --> 00:36:39,480 Speaker 1: Live demo of some patterns that you are to do 610 00:36:39,960 --> 00:36:41,640 Speaker 1: with competency test Lovely. 611 00:36:41,960 --> 00:36:46,080 Speaker 2: I'm Joseph Scott Morgan and this is Bodybacks