Speaker 1: Good morning, peeps, and welcome to wok F Daily with
Speaker 1: Meet your Girl Danielle Moody recording back in the home Bunker, folks,
Speaker 1: I got to tell you that, you know, the last
Speaker 1: several weeks, several months, to think that we're only five
Speaker 1: months into twenty twenty three, and the weight and the exhaustion,
Speaker 1: the anxiety, the fear, the trauma that we have been
Speaker 1: subject to because of the terrorist organization formerly known as
Speaker 1: the Republican Party. Republicans have shown America through their legislative
Speaker 1: push to criminalize LGBTQ people, to erase trans people, to
Speaker 1: cause irrevocable harm to the LGBTQ community. They have shown
Speaker 1: us through their willingness and zeal at banning books and curriculum,
Speaker 1: at displacing tenured teachers, at displacing heads of universities, and
Speaker 1: instead putting in corporate cronies, like they have done recently
Speaker 1: at the University of Minnesota with the new president. Instead
Speaker 1: of hiring an oh I don't know, an academic, have
Speaker 1: now hired the former CEO or Hormel in order to
Speaker 1: be the president of this university. Republicans are on a path,
Speaker 1: on a war path to destroy everything that makes America America.
Speaker 1: They are on a path to destroy liberty, freedom and
Speaker 1: justice for all. They are on a path to destroy
Speaker 1: the bodily autonomy of women of trans people. They are
Speaker 1: on the war path to create heightened racism and violence
Speaker 1: and the birth of militias through their continued loosening of
Speaker 1: gun regulations in states like Texas, whose mass shootings are
Speaker 1: like number one in the country. And at this time,
Speaker 1: while Republicans continue to show you who they are by
Speaker 1: voting to expel members of their government body because they
Speaker 1: don't like their ideology, they don't like the truth that
Speaker 1: they speak, whether again that be in Tennessee or in Montana. Folks,
Speaker 1: the Republican Party is at war and they are telling
Speaker 1: us every single day with every piece of life legislation,
Speaker 1: with every kudos, every bit of support, back pats and
Speaker 1: ring kisses that they give to Donald Trump, a man
Speaker 1: who is currently on trial for rape. And as I
Speaker 1: speak right now, the jury is out deliberating whether or
Speaker 1: not they are going to side with Egene Carol or
Speaker 1: with Donald Trump, who, by the way, has been accused
Speaker 1: of sexual assault and harassment by over twenty five women.
Speaker 1: But CNNC's fit to give this motherfucker prime time, a
Speaker 1: primetime town hall. Tell me how the public would react if,
Speaker 1: at the height of the me too movement against Harvey Weinstein,
Speaker 1: if CNN decided to have a sit down one on
Speaker 1: one with Harvey. I call on all civil liberty organizations,
Speaker 1: women's groups, LGBTQ groups, civil rights organizations to call for
Speaker 1: a boycott of CNN. You see all of these networks.
Speaker 1: They've based their decisions on money, they based their decisions
Speaker 1: on ratings, and if the people decide to take it,
Speaker 1: then maybe they will do it about face. But the
Speaker 1: reality is, in any other country, if you had a
Speaker 1: political party moving in the way that Republicans have been
Speaker 1: moving since Donald Trump came down that fucking escalator, they
Speaker 1: would have been labeled a terrorist organization. We don't do
Speaker 1: it because the Republican Party is filled with white men, right,
Speaker 1: and they're the ones that get to write the laws
Speaker 1: and break the laws and rewrite them for a other
Speaker 1: fucking people. I am telling you that it is time
Speaker 1: for the people, for the people to regain the power
Speaker 1: in this country, power that we never really truly had,
Speaker 1: but we were made comfortable enough. But now this terrorist organization.
Speaker 1: The only thing that they have on the menu is cruelty.
Speaker 1: The only thing that they have on the menu is
Speaker 1: over policing, banning books, banning queer people, banning abortion, banning curriculum,
Speaker 1: and instituting authoritarianism and fascism. Donald Trump is going to
Speaker 1: be holding a campaign rally with known anti Semites. They
Speaker 1: have top billing at this event, along with his fucking spawn.
Speaker 1: We need to stop treating Republicans as if they are legitimate.
Speaker 1: They stand for violence, they stand for rape, they stand
Speaker 1: against abortion, they stand against democracy. There is no mincing
Speaker 1: words about it. There is no working across the aisle
Speaker 1: because the only work that Republicans are interested in is
Speaker 1: destruction and undermining this country. And also with the debt ceiling,
Speaker 1: fucking chicken game that they're playing, putting the world's economy
Speaker 1: at risk so that they can figure out a way
Speaker 1: to bring back their fucking cheeto martyr. Folks, you hear
Speaker 1: that sound going off, You feel that tingling sensation. That
Speaker 1: is the alarms going off both internally and externally. We
Speaker 1: are at level hot fucking red right now in this country.
Speaker 1: The folks of Texas need to take a page out
Speaker 1: of those that were in Tennessee and take it to
Speaker 1: the fucking streets. While people are being gunned down as
Speaker 1: they're shopping at a mall, your fucking governor is passing
Speaker 1: legislation that doesn't even require any training whatsoever to have
Speaker 1: a gun, because it's all a part of their plan
Speaker 1: to build their white supremacist militias that will go ahead
Speaker 1: and enforce their autocratic rule. Folks, Wake up, Wake up,
Speaker 1: because there is no motherfucking quiet part anymore. Coming up next,
Speaker 1: my conversation with our good friend who is stopped by
Speaker 1: wok F Daily MSNBC legal analysts, former federal prosecutor and
Speaker 1: the host of Justice Matters, Glenn Kirshner. Folks, I am
Speaker 1: very happy to welcome back to WOKF Daily our friend,
Speaker 1: MSNBC legal analyst, former federal prosecutor, and the host of
Speaker 1: Justice Matters, Glenn Kirshner. Glenn, it has been a while,
Speaker 1: and in that time there has been just a world
Speaker 1: win of legal news, and I don't even know if
Speaker 1: we call it legal news anymore. We just call it
Speaker 1: crime in news. I mean, from Clarence Thomas and the
Speaker 1: Supreme Court and the major griff there to Donald Trump. Currently,
Speaker 1: the juries and deliberation for the Egen King rape allegations
Speaker 1: and defamation suit. And a judge just issued an order
Speaker 1: in the Manhattan District Attorney's k with regard to the
Speaker 1: thirty four felony indictments placed a gag order on Donald Trump.
Speaker 1: And I want you to be able to just explain
Speaker 1: what this gag order is and why. I mean, I mean,
Speaker 1: I have thought that Donald Trump should have been gagged
Speaker 1: a long time ago, but why this is happening now
Speaker 1: and will what could be the repercussions of it if
Speaker 1: he breaks said gag order.
Speaker 2: So I think the.
Speaker 3: Reason we're seeing a gag order now, it's sort of
Speaker 3: the cumulative effect of everything Donald Trump has been posting
Speaker 3: and saying. Most recently, he posted that Joe Biden and
Speaker 3: Merrick Garland illegally unleashed Alvin Bragg and Fawnie Willis and
Speaker 3: New York Attorney General Letitia James on me, Donald Trump
Speaker 3: to stop me from winning the twenty twenty four election.
Speaker 3: There are so many lies packed into that sentence. One,
Speaker 3: it is designed to gain unfair advance for Donald Trump
Speaker 3: in the twenty twenty four election by suggesting Biden and
Speaker 3: Garland have control over state prosecutors and they have unleashed
Speaker 3: them on Donald Trump.
Speaker 2: That's absolute bs.
Speaker 3: And look, Donald Trump has been endangering judges and their families,
Speaker 3: prosecutors and their families, grand jurors, trial jurors, witnesses, and
Speaker 3: Alvin Bragg's prosecutors said enough, we are preparing to give
Speaker 3: over discovery. And what discovery is in a criminal case
Speaker 3: is they package up all of the relevant information and
Speaker 3: evidence that they are required under the rules to provide
Speaker 3: to the defendant and they give it over.
Speaker 2: Well, what will Donald Trump do with it?
Speaker 3: Once he gets his grubby, little and I do mean
Speaker 3: little hands on that evidence, He'll begin posting it, He'll
Speaker 3: begin lying about it, He'll begin boxing people. He will
Speaker 3: not so subtly earn his supporters to get after them.
Speaker 3: And so that's what prompted Alvin Bragg's team to say, Judge,
Speaker 3: we're moving for a gag order, really more precisely a
Speaker 3: protective order, saying Donald Trump can't post, can't talk about,
Speaker 3: can't misuse all of this information we are about to
Speaker 3: give him. And Judge Mersham agreed and issued a couple
Speaker 3: of different kinds of protective orders, one saying Donald Trump
Speaker 3: and he names Trump specifically, not just the defense team.
Speaker 3: You can't post anything about any of it, and by
Speaker 3: the way, you can't copy it, you can't photograph it,
Speaker 3: you can't retain it. And in fact, the stuff that
Speaker 3: the prosecutors label as limited disclosure information, you're not even
Speaker 3: allowed to look at it without being babysat by your
Speaker 3: defense attorneys because you're a petulant little child. I mean,
Speaker 3: the fact that these kind of protective orders and limitations
Speaker 3: have to be put in place for a former president
Speaker 3: of the United States is insane. Usually do this kind
Speaker 3: of stuff in violent crime cases or in rico cases. Well, now,
Speaker 3: welcome to that ignoble club Trump, you violent criminals and
Speaker 3: mafia folk.
Speaker 1: You know, I think that it's wild to that mainstream
Speaker 1: media is not discussing that right that we continue to
Speaker 1: move through this as if the precautions that are being
Speaker 1: taken are totally normal, like, oh, this happens in every case.
Speaker 1: You would think that with the president of the United States,
Speaker 1: you're being held right to a much higher standard of
Speaker 1: behavior and that we would rely upon you to ensure
Speaker 1: the safety of people by telling your rabid followers to
Speaker 1: stand the hell down. But that's not what Donald Trump does.
Speaker 1: It has been the pattern of behavior since he was
Speaker 1: in office and out of office, and so you know, well, Glenn,
Speaker 1: I am. I love to say that, oh we'll never see,
Speaker 1: and I stopped doing that during the entire Trump administration
Speaker 1: is we have seen judges be targeted, their families be targeted.
Speaker 1: We've seen them have family members that have lost their
Speaker 1: lives and judges that have lost their lives. What happens
Speaker 1: if Donald Trump impedes this gag order? If Donald Trump
Speaker 1: continues to do what he's been doing on the campaign trail,
Speaker 1: which is essentially lift up these very violent people. Right,
Speaker 1: he had the January sixth choir in Waco, Texas. Right,
Speaker 1: you have just now I want to make the connection
Speaker 1: for the folks the shooter, the murderer in Alan, Texas
Speaker 1: at the mall shooting had on the what was it?
Speaker 1: Right wing death squad badge that was worn and sold
Speaker 1: on the Proud Boys website. Right, these are the folks
Speaker 1: that Donald Trump hold to stand back and stand by.
Speaker 1: These are the folks that Donald Trump has said are
Speaker 1: good people. Right. So I mean I am very scared. Right,
Speaker 1: I'm scared for Alan Bragg. I'm scared for this judge.
Speaker 1: What happens if this order is broken, and you know,
Speaker 1: what are the protections that are in place in this
Speaker 1: really erratic time when, even if it isn't Donald Trump,
Speaker 1: we know we're seeing what's happening with the people who
Speaker 1: support him.
Speaker 3: So Judge Marshawn has an array of possible steps he
Speaker 3: can take. I'm going to say when Donald Trump violates
Speaker 3: this protective order, not if Donald Trump will violate it.
Speaker 3: He could do nothing. He could just let it go,
Speaker 3: which will embolden Donald Trump. He could haul Donald Trump
Speaker 3: back in before the court and he could increase the
Speaker 3: limitations or the restrictions. He could place one hundred percent
Speaker 3: gag order on him, saying you have demonstrated an unwillingness
Speaker 3: or inability to abide by lesser gag orders or protective orders.
Speaker 3: I am now ratcheting it up. And the next step,
Speaker 3: if you continue to violate it, I will consider the
Speaker 3: prosecutor's request to step you back detain you because you
Speaker 3: can't be trusted to abide by court orders. Now, that
Speaker 3: is a pretty significant penalty, and he could short of that,
Speaker 3: he could hold him in contempt and order him to pay,
Speaker 3: you know, a fine, which Donald Trump won't care about.
Speaker 2: He'll fundraise off it and probably end up with a
Speaker 2: gain at the end of the day.
Speaker 3: If the court orders find the only thing to do
Speaker 3: with people who are inciting and inspiring imminent violence is
Speaker 3: detained them take their bullhorn away. And I haven't seen
Speaker 3: an appetite in our prosecutors or our judiciary to do
Speaker 3: the hard work, the forward leaning work of stopping this
Speaker 3: rampant violence that is being sort of advocated for every day.
Speaker 3: Why the Proud Boys organization isn't designated a terrorist organization
Speaker 3: and then we go after not only the organization but
Speaker 3: those who kind of spout off violent rhetoric likely to
Speaker 3: and designed to inspire imminent violence is beyond me.
Speaker 2: You know.
Speaker 3: I keep thinking that we are so concerned that if
Speaker 3: we do something and will be criticized for stepping the
Speaker 3: toe over the constant to shell a ligne, violating somebody's
Speaker 3: free speech rights. If we do anything to curb the
Speaker 3: rampant gun violence in this country and we're criticized, you know,
Speaker 3: stepping a toe over the Second Amendment, Danielle, We're going
Speaker 3: to freedom ourselves to death.
Speaker 2: Come on, if we don't start.
Speaker 3: Taking action to stop this nonsense, does.
Speaker 1: This gag order to glunt. Does it pertain to the
Speaker 1: lawyers using their his lawyers using their bully pulpit using
Speaker 1: social media. That's one question. And then the other one
Speaker 1: is we also know that, you know, his spawn continue
Speaker 1: to spout and share a lot of violent rhetoric on
Speaker 1: social media, What if anything would be done to them?
Speaker 3: Yeah, I'm reading through the motion right here. I do
Speaker 3: believe it. There's no loophole.
Speaker 2: For the lawyers to percept what Donald Trump can't post. Okay,
Speaker 2: And frankly I don't.
Speaker 3: I don't think even as you know, poor you know,
Speaker 3: in the performance sense, as poor as the you know,
Speaker 3: Joey Takapine is and these kind of guys are, I
Speaker 3: don't think they would be the ones violating the court order.
Speaker 3: I think it's all about Trump. But if they do,
Speaker 3: they could you know, there are some additional possible sanctions
Speaker 3: because they could be referred to their own bar council
Speaker 3: for sanctions, for suspension, for fines, and ultimately for disbarment
Speaker 3: if it's a an egregious enough transgression.
Speaker 2: So, you know, the.
Speaker 3: Judge Marshawn has taken an important first step. And here's
Speaker 3: the thing. We are making incremental progress. I know it
Speaker 3: doesn't feel like it, but he has been tried for
Speaker 3: sexual assault and defamation, and a jury is deciding his guilt,
Speaker 3: not his guilt, but deciding who to rule for e
Speaker 3: Gen Carrol or Donald Trump, a former president, has now
Speaker 3: been tried for or sexual assault and defamation. He has
Speaker 3: been criminally indicted for thirty four felony accounts of creating
Speaker 3: false business records why to steal the presidency. This is
Speaker 3: not creating false business records because you're trying to keep
Speaker 3: a little bit of money that you really should pay
Speaker 3: to the government in taxes.
Speaker 2: Now, this was.
Speaker 3: False business records designed to steal the presidents. He's criminally indicted.
Speaker 3: Now we have a new first. We have him with
Speaker 3: a gag order prohibiting him from misusing the evidence he's
Speaker 3: about to get in discovery. We're making progress. It doesn't
Speaker 3: feel like it, but we are making progress.
Speaker 1: Glen. In the time that we haven't spoken to you know,
Speaker 1: I want to head down now, just mentally to Georgia
Speaker 1: where the DA down there. Bonnie Willis issued a statement
Speaker 1: which I at the time thought was weird, you know, bizarre,
Speaker 1: issued a statement saying that the decision of whether or
Speaker 1: not to indict is going to happen between July and
Speaker 1: September of this year, and was putting the law enforcement
Speaker 1: on months notice. Glenn, what did you make of that statement?
Speaker 1: Was it? Like, why would Fannie Willis make it so
Speaker 1: many months in advance? Why do you think that that
Speaker 1: was necessary?
Speaker 3: It had nothing to do with putting law enforcement on notice.
Speaker 3: She could have had a behind closed doors meeting right
Speaker 3: saying okay, folks, you know indictments are coming in July.
Speaker 3: That wasn't for law enforcements benefit, my benefit, your benefit.
Speaker 3: It was for the benefit of the twenty plus targets
Speaker 3: of her criminal investigation. She put them directly on notice
Speaker 3: with this letter that you all have until July to
Speaker 3: come in cooperate. You know, probably take a little bite
Speaker 3: of the criminal charges that you have coming your way,
Speaker 3: but you'll be able to reduce your exposure significantly if
Speaker 3: you plead guilty and begin cooperating so I can work
Speaker 3: my way up the criminal ladder. This was a pr
Speaker 3: move designed to pressure the twenty plus targets of her investigation.
Speaker 3: Had nothing to do with putting law enforcement on notice.
Speaker 1: Now, is that a risky move in your opinion? Like,
Speaker 1: because again, isn't that something that could have been directly
Speaker 1: sent to the folks who have been asked to come
Speaker 1: in to provide their deposition over the course of these many,
Speaker 1: many months. Isn't that something that could have been done
Speaker 1: in private? What does it mean to do it in
Speaker 1: such a public way.
Speaker 3: It doesn't become real to many criminal targets of a
Speaker 3: grand jury's investigation until it is out there the public square,
Speaker 3: because then they're going to understand that. Fawnie Willis just
Speaker 3: put herself on the line and said, I don't think
Speaker 3: she really said, and I don't know that you have
Speaker 3: to read between the lines that I'll make a decision
Speaker 3: whether to prosecute people in July. She said, law enforcement
Speaker 3: buckle up charges are coming in July. That was the
Speaker 3: I think thrust of her letter. Once that's put out
Speaker 3: there publicly by the district attorney, the targets know it's coming,
Speaker 3: rather than well, you know what, we're still kind of
Speaker 3: dealing behind closed doors. I'm thinking maybe my attorney can
Speaker 3: still keep me from being indicted.
Speaker 2: At no, No, you.
Speaker 3: Got sixty days and then you're gonna find yourself on
Speaker 3: the other side of the v.
Speaker 2: Georgia v. You what you're gonna do.
Speaker 1: So in this time too, Glenn, we have now seen Enriquaetorio,
Speaker 1: the Proud Boys and three other members can victed found
Speaker 1: guilty on conspiras on a seditious conspiracy, which you and
Speaker 1: I have talked about so many times because it's a
Speaker 1: difficult charge to bring and to prove. So now multiple
Speaker 1: people from the Oath Keepers to the Proud Boys right
Speaker 1: have been found guilty of seditious conspiracy. Again, how does
Speaker 1: this these convictions, these guilty charges fall on the Department
Speaker 1: of Justice and the work that Smith is doing.
Speaker 3: Yeah, so this is something I call atmospheric precedent. You know,
Speaker 3: legal precedent technically means when an appellate court decides a
Speaker 3: case hands down an opinion, all the lower courts are
Speaker 3: obliged to follow that precedent. That's what precedent means most
Speaker 3: precisely in the law. But atmospheric precedent is when you know,
Speaker 3: juries return verdicts in cases that are related to other
Speaker 3: cases and other people. And here's where I think the
Speaker 3: Department of Justice gets the biggest bump from the Proud
Speaker 3: Boy's convictions. Enrique Tario was convicted of seditious conspiracy and
Speaker 3: a whole bunch of crimes that were committed at the
Speaker 3: Capitol on January sixth, And he was not at the
Speaker 3: capital on January.
Speaker 2: Sixth, He wasn't even in DC.
Speaker 3: You know who else wasn't at the Capitol but was
Speaker 3: but is responsible for what happened there on January sixth,
Speaker 3: Steve Bannon, Mike Flynn, Roger Stone, Rudy Giuliani, John Eastman,
Speaker 3: Mark Meadows, Donald Trump. Now both the Department of Justice
Speaker 3: has charged and a jury has convicted somebody who was
Speaker 3: responsible for those crimes but was nowhere near the capital.
Speaker 3: That kind of sets an atmospheric precedent. And if I
Speaker 3: were involved on the prosecution team, I would say, Ken,
Speaker 3: we finally go after the people at.
Speaker 2: The Willard war Room now and indict them? Can we finally.
Speaker 3: Go after Mark Meadows and Donald Trump and indict them? Look,
Speaker 3: we're doing a bang up job prosecuting the boots of
Speaker 3: the insurrection to foot soldiers. Time to get after the
Speaker 3: suits of the insurrection, the people who organized, orchestrated, funded,
Speaker 3: and incited, indeed gave the order to attack the capital.
Speaker 3: Let's get after it because we're burning democracy daylight. It
Speaker 3: blows my mind that we're treating Donald Trump like a
Speaker 3: viable candidate for the presidency.
Speaker 2: Let them hold town hall meetings, and CNN is gonna
Speaker 2: comporate it. Are you insane? Are you insane?
Speaker 3: This man he should be hounded every second of every
Speaker 3: day by every reporter on earth until he has nothing
Speaker 3: he can do but like say, in his little third
Speaker 3: rate resort mar A Lago with his moles that is, bedbugs,
Speaker 3: and not see the light of day until the marshals
Speaker 3: come and arrest him.
Speaker 2: It's insane that.
Speaker 3: We treat this man like he's a viable candidate for
Speaker 3: government office.
Speaker 2: After he ordered, he organized, he launched an.
Speaker 3: Attack on the US capital to try to unlawfully retain
Speaker 3: the power of the presidency.
Speaker 2: That is lunacy.
Speaker 1: I mean everything that you said, I have been tweeting,
Speaker 1: I said, you know, I don't understand how this. Having
Speaker 1: Donald Trump do a town hall at CNN right now
Speaker 1: as the man is literally as a jury is literally
Speaker 1: deliberating a rape case that he is at the center of,
Speaker 1: is like would have been giving Harvey Weinstein a town
Speaker 1: hall in the middle of all of the horrific allegations
Speaker 1: that were coming down of sexual assault and violence. Like,
Speaker 1: how do I don't understand the difference there.
Speaker 2: And this is a man Danielle, who we saw during
Speaker 2: the Egen Carol trial. We saw his deposition. He said, Hey,
Speaker 2: for millions of years, stars have been able to sexually.
Speaker 1: Oh my god, I'm a star.
Speaker 3: And you know what, unfortunately or fortunately, I get to
Speaker 3: do it, he said, stars get to sexually assault women.
Speaker 2: I'm a star. I get to do it.
Speaker 3: Fortunately, every single Republican politician who remains in Donald Trump's
Speaker 3: corner co signs that statement, adopts that statement, and announces, Yes,
Speaker 3: that's the kind of person we want in the Oval office.
Speaker 3: Are you sing kidding me?
Speaker 1: I mean, it is it? Honestly, Glenn, it is. We
Speaker 1: are in such and I'm so tired of this word,
Speaker 1: but such unprecedented, erratic, violent, criminal times. And honestly, you know,
Speaker 1: the last question that I have for you today is,
Speaker 1: even if, Glenn, even if all were to go our way,
Speaker 1: even if Jack Smith comes down, even if you know,
Speaker 1: the if Fannie Willis comes down, we go to court
Speaker 1: in Manhattan, Egen wins her. You know it's decided in
Speaker 1: her favor. Where do we go do you know, like
Speaker 1: you because you have you just named we have an
Speaker 1: entire Republican Party that is behind a man that has
Speaker 1: been incused at least twenty six times of sexual harassment
Speaker 1: and assault. A man that has thirty four felony indictments
Speaker 1: against him for falsifying records, has other indictments hanging over
Speaker 1: his head for either stealing documents inciting an insurrection, Like
Speaker 1: where do we go?
Speaker 2: I don't know, you.
Speaker 3: Know, I asked myself the question all the time. Can
Speaker 3: we really really dig out and rebuild? I hope the
Speaker 3: answer is yes. I have to believe the answer is yes,
Speaker 3: because the alternative is just too dark to consider that.
Speaker 2: No, we can't. We're done. We're just going to.
Speaker 3: Spend the rest of our lives fighting aspiring autocrats and
Speaker 3: dictators and avowed you know, sexual offenders who say they
Speaker 3: have a right to do it.
Speaker 2: But you think about it.
Speaker 3: I mean, the Republican Party took away women's rights. The
Speaker 3: Republican Party is comfortable with children being murdered because they're
Speaker 3: more interested in supporting the gun lobby and everybody's you know,
Speaker 3: desire to have a weapon of mass destruction an assault rifle.
Speaker 3: I mean, they're comfortable with compromise at the Supreme Court.
Speaker 3: They embrace all of this. Yeah. So, hopefully if the
Speaker 3: Republican Party is put out of business by this as
Speaker 3: a result of their continued adherence to Donald Trump, some
Speaker 3: responsible Republican Party rises up from the ashes.
Speaker 2: I always point to people whose policies.
Speaker 3: I disagree with, but Liz Cheney and Adam Kinsinger who said,
Speaker 3: I don't care about my job. I care about protecting
Speaker 3: and saving our republic from criminal politicians, and that is
Speaker 3: how I will spend my days fighting and listen, great,
Speaker 3: let's have them come into power and then argue about policy,
Speaker 3: not about whether sexually assaulting women is fortunately something the
Speaker 3: stars get to do.
Speaker 1: Glenn, we will leave it here today. Thank you as
Speaker 1: always for your analysis, your insight, and your indignation at
Speaker 1: where this country is and our legal system is right now.
Speaker 1: We really appreciate you.
Speaker 2: Thanks Danielle.
Speaker 1: That is it for me today. Dear friends on woka
Speaker 1: app as always, power to the people and to all
Speaker 1: the people. Power yet woke, and stay woke as fuck.