Speaker 1: You are entering the freedom. Huge more lockdowns on the
Speaker 1: way across the country. We're bringing up to speed on
Speaker 1: where and how severe. Plus updates on the Trump election, fight,
Speaker 1: threats against Michigan election officials and Governor Cuomo blames COVID victims,
Speaker 1: Buck Sextons, decoding the news and disseminating information with actionable intelligence.
Speaker 1: Make no mistake American, Great, Great American Again. This is
Speaker 1: the Buck Sexton Show, Puma CIA analysts. I can speak
Speaker 1: to three hours without a phone call. Try doing that sometime.
Speaker 1: If I told you that twelve months ago the Democrats
Speaker 1: and the media would be cheering on politics for threatening
Speaker 1: to arrest people for the crime of gathering with their
Speaker 1: families on Thanksgiving, you would have thought that if I
Speaker 1: had said that, I was insane, right, If anyone had
Speaker 1: told you that, you would have thought that they were
Speaker 1: completely crazy. But here we are. This is happening right now,
Speaker 1: and now the question becomes, are we going to continue
Speaker 1: to comply or are we going to fight? Now? What
Speaker 1: does fight mean in this context? An excellent question. People
Speaker 1: bring this up. Exercising autonomy and freedom in every way
Speaker 1: you can based upon your own individual circumstance, which takes
Speaker 1: into account your health risk toleration, which takes into account
Speaker 1: where you are in the country. Are there any others
Speaker 1: who think like you? Are you going to be the
Speaker 1: one person in some sea of blue? Because as we know,
Speaker 1: this has become political. This is insane. It never should
Speaker 1: have been, but now it is. You see, opposing mask
Speaker 1: mandates and shutdowns was never about Trump, despite all the
Speaker 1: garbage Pedalty and the American media, you can see, I
Speaker 1: don't care who the president ends up being when it
Speaker 1: comes to lockdowns. I don't want them. I don't support them.
Speaker 1: I don't think the data supports them. I think they're unconstitutional.
Speaker 1: I think it's tyranny. This is going now beyond even
Speaker 1: a deep constitutional argument to just a natural law and
Speaker 1: natural rights argument. I have a right as a human
Speaker 1: being to spend time with my family over a holiday,
Speaker 1: irrespective of whether the government thinks it's good for my health.
Speaker 1: I don't give a crap what the government thinks about it.
Speaker 1: This is about individual decision making. It's about having the agency,
Speaker 1: the free will to live your life as you see fit.
Speaker 1: Remember you're not doing anything in violation of actual law.
Speaker 1: You're not harming anyone. But they pretend that you are.
Speaker 1: They pretend that just because you're out and about it
Speaker 1: means that there's a possibility of risk. But there's always
Speaker 1: a possibility of risk for countless activities that the government
Speaker 1: does not prevent. The government does not threaten to lock
Speaker 1: you up for engaging in those activities. You know, there
Speaker 1: are anti COVID protests in Germany, there have been some
Speaker 1: in Spain, there have been in many European countries. I
Speaker 1: suppose we're going to be told that these are all
Speaker 1: just far right nationalists or some other nonsense in our
Speaker 1: own media. Maybe they're just people that are sick of
Speaker 1: walking around all the time now outside with masks on.
Speaker 1: Wearing masks outside is not scientifically supported. There is no study,
Speaker 1: there is no basis for this. But what you see
Speaker 1: is a constant shifting of what the science says based
Speaker 1: upon the needs of the left wing collectivist consensus. And
Speaker 1: that's what's happening right now. We have the CDC offering
Speaker 1: up guidance to people to avoid travel over Thanksgiving. I
Speaker 1: just want to ask you this. Do you think they're
Speaker 1: going to say, you know, what, good job over Thanksgiving? Guys? Now,
Speaker 1: the cases are really low. No, No, there will be
Speaker 1: more cases. We are entering a period here of upper
Speaker 1: respiratory virus spread, and people that were not infected the
Speaker 1: first go round are going to be at at continued
Speaker 1: risk to get infected this time. This is just the
Speaker 1: reality of what we're facing and what we're dealing with.
Speaker 1: But no matter what you do, remember, and I've been
Speaker 1: telling you this all along, they'll say it's not enough.
Speaker 1: They'll say it's insufficient. The lockdowns, the shutdowns of businesses
Speaker 1: that come along with it, the restrictions on your ability
Speaker 1: to move freely to worship, to engage in religious practice,
Speaker 1: to go to funerals, to go to weddings, to have
Speaker 1: birthday parties. Unless you're Gavin Newsom, then you can go
Speaker 1: with a whole bunch of people, including senior medical bureaucrats
Speaker 1: in the state of California, to have one of the
Speaker 1: fanciest dinners in the United States indoors, the elites have
Speaker 1: no problem with hypocrisy. In fact, hypocrisy feels good behind
Speaker 1: closed doors in places the elites don't really want to
Speaker 1: talk about. Feels good. They like that they can get
Speaker 1: away with this stuff. They like that the rules don't
Speaker 1: really apply to them. While They're going around crushing the
Speaker 1: likes of you and me, and I have to say
Speaker 1: I'm tired of it. I'm sick of so many Americans
Speaker 1: walking around doing what they're told. We should all move
Speaker 1: like a bunch of cows being herded into our pens.
Speaker 1: This is outrageous. I thought this was a country that
Speaker 1: believed in freedom and the risks that come with it.
Speaker 1: But no, we have bureaucrats. We have a system of
Speaker 1: control in place now that's taking all those decisions away
Speaker 1: from you. If you saw where we were where we
Speaker 1: are now, if you could have seen that a year ago,
Speaker 1: I'm telling you, you would have said, never in America
Speaker 1: would that happen. The American people would not go along
Speaker 1: with it. And that's why I say we fight. It's
Speaker 1: time to stop the lockdown madness. Those who want to
Speaker 1: live their lives should non comply however they can, and
Speaker 1: then what's the level beyond that those tasks with enforcement
Speaker 1: of these rules should refuse to do so. Those with
Speaker 1: power who pushed this tyranny should be held to account,
Speaker 1: and those in positions of authority who are trying to
Speaker 1: fight for greater liberty, for greater autonomy for us as individuals.
Speaker 1: For our lives to be up to us, those people
Speaker 1: should be supported with everything we can, with everything we've got.
Speaker 1: There's no one answer to how you fight back against this.
Speaker 1: It may be that you just refuse to mask up
Speaker 1: outside because it's idiotic, because there's no basis for it.
Speaker 1: Because they even told us that for months when the
Speaker 1: pandemic was raging through this country late last winter and
Speaker 1: into the spring, you don't need to wear a mask outside.
Speaker 1: That's not supported. The biggest studies that I've been done
Speaker 1: on this say that the risk of transmission outside is
Speaker 1: effectively nothing. So maybe you don't wear a mask outside.
Speaker 1: Some of you perhaps will say I don't want to
Speaker 1: wear a mask inside, but then you're going to run
Speaker 1: a foule of state law. You may find yourself harassed.
Speaker 1: Fights breakout over this, people become violent, that's how unhinged
Speaker 1: they are. There are people across the country right now
Speaker 1: who think they have a right to lay hands on
Speaker 1: you because there's a one in ten thousand chance that
Speaker 1: you may have a respiratory virus. That there is a
Speaker 1: tiny chance that if they're near you for more than
Speaker 1: fifteen minutes indoors, they may contract from you. The reproduction rate,
Speaker 1: the R number that goes along with viruses, even when
Speaker 1: it's at a pandemic. If it's an R of one,
Speaker 1: most people who get this are likely to give it
Speaker 1: to only one other person. So when you really do
Speaker 1: the math, anyone that's threatening violence against you, that lays
Speaker 1: hands on you because you're not wearing a mask is
Speaker 1: acting like a lunatic. But it happens. It happens all
Speaker 1: across the country. People have gotten into fights, There have
Speaker 1: even been people killed because they weren't wearing a mask.
Speaker 1: This is a mass brainwashing that has occurred. They ignore
Speaker 1: the data that they don't like, they dress up and
Speaker 1: inflate the data they do like. And they love this control.
Speaker 1: And we know they want to use it for much
Speaker 1: more than just COVID control. They want to use this
Speaker 1: for human control. They want to tell you what you
Speaker 1: can do, what you think. The same people that are
Speaker 1: pushing the Green New Deal, the same people that want
Speaker 1: socialism and a government that's constantly engaged in social justice
Speaker 1: re engineering of society. You think that they don't view
Speaker 1: this as an opportunity to remake this country and perhaps
Speaker 1: even the world. Of course they do. In fact, I
Speaker 1: bet There's a huge relationship between people who believe climate
Speaker 1: change is an existential threat to humanity who are also
Speaker 1: strong supporters of lockdowns and mask mandates. I'd say, if
Speaker 1: you support one, there's over a ninety percent chance you
Speaker 1: support the other. Probably a ninety nine percent chance. Right,
Speaker 1: If you believe climate change is an existential threat to humanity,
Speaker 1: you're a mask up all the time, indoors, maybe in
Speaker 1: the shower, maybe in bed, when you sleep at night.
Speaker 1: What if a fireman has to break into your home
Speaker 1: during a fire and carry you out, Gotta have that
Speaker 1: mask ready to go. Don't want to give him COVID.
Speaker 1: These people are insane and they think we're the crazy ones.
Speaker 1: I've told you the same thing all along. I act
Speaker 1: the way with COVID that I would during a bad
Speaker 1: flu season. In terms of the precautions, Yeah, if you're six,
Speaker 1: stay away from people. That's always been our custom. And
Speaker 1: when Fauci says abandoning all public health measures, no, I'm
Speaker 1: not about to go to a crowded house party with
Speaker 1: sixty people indoor, shoulder to shoulder. I'm not saying be stupid,
Speaker 1: but could I sit in a restaurant six feet away
Speaker 1: from people and feel like I'm probably gonna be Okay,
Speaker 1: yes I could. Is being shoulder to shoulder at a
Speaker 1: bar maybe not a great idea right now, okay, but
Speaker 1: those are right. Those are based on intelligent risk mitigation
Speaker 1: strategies that we all know exist and are real. And
Speaker 1: it's also a question of individual choice. I'm saying I
Speaker 1: wouldn't do that, but if somebody feels like one, maybe
Speaker 1: they've already had COVID too, they're not particularly concerned about it.
Speaker 1: They should be allowed to live their lives. It should
Speaker 1: be up to business owners if they want to open
Speaker 1: their doors right now, or if they want to go
Speaker 1: to the government for assistance in this period, that should
Speaker 1: also be an option for them. But it shouldn't be
Speaker 1: that everyone has to be shut down and everyone has
Speaker 1: to do whatever these tyrants in charge say. I mean,
Speaker 1: based on what we have had, the removal of choice
Speaker 1: from our lives in a way that's unprecedented, the trampling
Speaker 1: on liberties that has gone on here. We have so
Speaker 1: many people who talk about liberty, you know, and this
Speaker 1: is on our own side too, you know, they're waving
Speaker 1: flags and don't tread on me. And the founding fathers
Speaker 1: we believe in all this stuff. Do you think that
Speaker 1: the generation that was at Bunker Hill and conquered Bridge,
Speaker 1: you think that they would see what's going on right
Speaker 1: now in this country and say, yeah, good job, guys,
Speaker 1: really really carrying the torch of liberty here. Well, everyone hides,
Speaker 1: where's your mask? Where's your mask? No? I think we've
Speaker 1: all seen where that gets us. Do they have any answers?
Speaker 1: Do the mask shamers, the smug I listen to the
Speaker 1: science mask shamers? Do they even try to explain why
Speaker 1: we're having huge surges and cases across the country when
Speaker 1: we have more mask compliance than ever before. That's how
Speaker 1: effective masks are. We're wearing them all over the place,
Speaker 1: worst cases we've ever had, and in fact, the states
Speaker 1: that have had the longest mask mandates and the most
Speaker 1: strict ones are the worst hit by the virus once again.
Speaker 1: But they don't answer those questions. Do they don't? Really
Speaker 1: doesn't really matter to them, because, as I've been telling you,
Speaker 1: this is about something else. The answer to how we
Speaker 1: fight back against this is in every way that you
Speaker 1: can that you choose to. This is about whether you
Speaker 1: get to control your day to day life or the
Speaker 1: state gets to control your day to day life. You
Speaker 1: are going to be particularly brave. You're gonna say I'm
Speaker 1: gonna open my business. I'm going to walk around without
Speaker 1: a mask on. Understand there are consequences to that. You
Speaker 1: may get fined, your business may be shut down. Somebody
Speaker 1: might start a fight with you in the gym because
Speaker 1: you don't want to be on a treadmill with a
Speaker 1: mask on like an idiot. And I understand it. I
Speaker 1: appreciate that. I feel the same way. What everyone right
Speaker 1: now is making their own decisions about how to fight
Speaker 1: back against a movement that at its core is about
Speaker 1: removing your ability to make decisions. So there's there's some
Speaker 1: poetry there. There's some broader meaning in all of this.
Speaker 1: Tell people the truth about what you're seeing happening. Don't
Speaker 1: allow those who claim that they understand more than you
Speaker 1: for no apparent reason, to bully you and silence you
Speaker 1: and make you do things you don't want to do.
Speaker 1: Fight back at your school board to get schools open.
Speaker 1: People who say schools should be closed are idiots. They're wrong.
Speaker 1: We've run the experiment. They were wrong. It's the lazy,
Speaker 1: disgusting teachers unions that are pushing for this stuff in
Speaker 1: major cities we all know it. Fight for schools to
Speaker 1: reopen in your area. Fight for restaurants to stay as
Speaker 1: open as possible fifty percent capacity, you know, seventy five
Speaker 1: percent capacity. Do what you can support those local businesses.
Speaker 1: We all have to band together here. The government's not
Speaker 1: going to pull us through this thing, and the government's
Speaker 1: not going to give us back our freedom. We have
Speaker 1: to find ways to do it ourselves. We have to
Speaker 1: take that freedom back and otherwise we're going to have
Speaker 1: holiday after holiday for months on end here where we're told, sorry,
Speaker 1: you don't get to see your loved ones, you don't
Speaker 1: have the right. I'm sorry. I still think this is America,
Speaker 1: and I'm not willing to give it up to the
Speaker 1: fauci morons of the world. Not willing to do it.
Speaker 1: You're in the freedom hunt. This is the Buck sex
Speaker 1: In Show podcast. There are many states that do have
Speaker 1: mask mandates in place and some that do not. But
Speaker 1: I look at their rate of spread and the fact
Speaker 1: is is that cases are increasing in many of those
Speaker 1: states as well. If you look at Wisconsin, they've had
Speaker 1: a mask mandate since August and they have a higher
Speaker 1: rate of spread than the state of South Dakota. You
Speaker 1: look at Montana, they've had a mask mandate in place
Speaker 1: since July. Both of those states have higher rates of
Speaker 1: spread than the state of South Dakota. When you look
Speaker 1: at Wyoming, it has the fastest spread in the nation.
Speaker 1: And that is the concern that I have as many times,
Speaker 1: I don't want to approach a policy or a mandate
Speaker 1: just looking to make people feel good. I want to
Speaker 1: do good and actually put forward provisions that make a
Speaker 1: difference for families. And these local communities have some flexibility
Speaker 1: today that Sue Falls can make a different decision than
Speaker 1: Rapid City. Rapid City can make a different decision than Lemon,
Speaker 1: South Dakota, Watertowne can make a different decision than Pure
Speaker 1: And that's what some of these local leaders are doing
Speaker 1: in reacting to the people in the community based on
Speaker 1: what they want. Doesn't that seem entirely reasonable to you.
Speaker 1: That's Governor Christy Noum, who I hope has a bigger
Speaker 1: future in the GOP. I think she's a star. I
Speaker 1: think she's what people like to think Nicky Haley is.
Speaker 1: But Nicky Haley is not in terms of the next
Speaker 1: best chance of a GOP female presidential candidate, somebody who
Speaker 1: would do really well in the Midwest, really well in
Speaker 1: the rust belt states. That's what I see. But back
Speaker 1: to what she's saying here, we have a lot of data.
Speaker 1: The data gets ignored. Mask mandates do not work. But
Speaker 1: the problem is the other side claims they're they're unfalsifiable.
Speaker 1: Right the moment that we talk about a mask mandate,
Speaker 1: they say, well, it'd be so much worse unless it'd
Speaker 1: be so much worse unless we had them in place. Well,
Speaker 1: how do we prove that. Shouldn't we be thinking about
Speaker 1: mask mandates in terms that would be obvious to everybody,
Speaker 1: as in, of course these work. Of course these are
Speaker 1: great and they make everything just fine, right, But that's
Speaker 1: not the way that it goes. They won't ever back
Speaker 1: off of this. You think they'll admit to people that
Speaker 1: they put them through all this. You think they'll admit
Speaker 1: to people that that's the reality. They just made mistakes here.
Speaker 1: There were enormous mistakes made in so many other areas
Speaker 1: of the COVID response, But on this one they're claiming
Speaker 1: on this one, they're claiming it's settled science. Right. They
Speaker 1: were putting people on ventilators, which was a terrible idea
Speaker 1: and caused a lot of people to die. That probably
Speaker 1: this is the medical community. Now. Now I'm not blaming anyone,
Speaker 1: but I'm saying there were enormous mistakes made there. We
Speaker 1: don't really ever talk about it. But masks. They won't
Speaker 1: back off of masks they think are sacred somehow. And
Speaker 1: remember it is a symbol. It's about more than just
Speaker 1: that piece of cloth over your face. It has turned
Speaker 1: into will you comply right? You know, don't tread on me.
Speaker 1: It's time for people to start saying, don't mask on me.
Speaker 1: Enough is enough. Thanks for listening to the Bus Sesson
Speaker 1: Show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on Apple podcasts, the iHeartRadio app,
Speaker 1: or wherever you get your podcasts. So this is a
Speaker 1: good Thanksgiving to just stay home and stay within your
Speaker 1: bubble or at most you know a small number of
Speaker 1: additional two or three people who you know are also
Speaker 1: taking really good precautions. But this is a good year
Speaker 1: to stay home, and it's a good year for us
Speaker 1: to do it across the US. So maybe we could
Speaker 1: have a better Christmas. There's two hundred and fifty thousand
Speaker 1: dead people. We'd like to limit that further. And the
Speaker 1: other thing I'd like to pick up that the point
Speaker 1: I heard earlier on the show is a single negative
Speaker 1: test is not a pass to say I am fine,
Speaker 1: I can now go do whatever I want, because you
Speaker 1: may well still be infected and incubating. So please be
Speaker 1: cautious of thinking that, well, I got a single negative
Speaker 1: test somewhere and I'm I'm good to go stay home.
Speaker 1: You can't tell Thanksgiving dinner. I mean, you just can't
Speaker 1: test your way to that table. The way you can't
Speaker 1: test your way into Thanksgiving dinner. And we've seen this
Speaker 1: around the president, right. You can't even protect the president
Speaker 1: with a testing strategy. Even tests won't protect you from
Speaker 1: passing it on too relatives, getting it from relatives. They're
Speaker 1: telling you, I thought testing was our way out of this.
Speaker 1: Remember that they always find the negative interpretation, because there's
Speaker 1: no such thing as perfect health security. They always find
Speaker 1: the well, it's possible. Therefore, let's go with the most
Speaker 1: extreme interpretation. People die every year. Tens of thousands of
Speaker 1: people die in America every year from influenza. Nobody ever says,
Speaker 1: and half Thanksgiving, don't open your business wear masks never
Speaker 1: happens now you could say, well, Buck, that's only tens
Speaker 1: of thousands, that's every single year. And I know that
Speaker 1: they've they've made this argument, Oh you're a flu bro
Speaker 1: and there's all this How is this non a valid argument?
Speaker 1: They never even address this. We accept as the cost
Speaker 1: of living in a free society. Anywhere from thirty to
Speaker 1: eighty thousand deaths will occur in the United States every
Speaker 1: year from influenza, okay, And that that doesn't even take
Speaker 1: into account people that during the same respiratory period, a
Speaker 1: respiory illness period, are going to get other viruses that
Speaker 1: might turn into a bacterial pneumonia or in other ways
Speaker 1: that people end up succumbing. You know, we're talking about
Speaker 1: mostly older people who are at risk. Guess we are
Speaker 1: all going to get old and we are all going
Speaker 1: to die. That is our reality as human beings. What's
Speaker 1: open to us in the meantime is what can we
Speaker 1: do between now and then? How much freedom do we have?
Speaker 1: How much joy, how much of a contribution? How worthwhile
Speaker 1: can we make our time here? And these idiots in
Speaker 1: the government, in the public health sector are taking your
Speaker 1: time from you. I have never said if you are worried,
Speaker 1: if you have health conditions, if you think you're at
Speaker 1: a high risk, whatever precautions you want to take, by
Speaker 1: all means, and we should be set up to support
Speaker 1: anybody who feels like they're in that category. They should
Speaker 1: have an ability easily. There's a lot of food delivery
Speaker 1: services and things like that in large cities, but in
Speaker 1: more rural areas, people should be able to bring them
Speaker 1: food in a safe and secure manner. People should able
Speaker 1: to bring them their medicine. I mean, we should have
Speaker 1: this all set up. But me, I'm going into an
Speaker 1: office every day right now. Already. I live in New
Speaker 1: York City. I was riding the subway every day, four
Speaker 1: times a day, believe it or not, during the height
Speaker 1: of the pandemic spread and even after it New York City,
Speaker 1: there were a few weeks there where I was still
Speaker 1: riding the subway every day. So yes, I would live
Speaker 1: my life. And when the virus was really bad, did
Speaker 1: I limit some contact with my parents to try to sure.
Speaker 1: But if everyone in your family feels fine, and now
Speaker 1: they're saying even if you get a COVID test beforehand,
Speaker 1: that's not sufficient. What they're saying is that there's a
Speaker 1: you know, a one in ten thousand chance. Remember, it's
Speaker 1: not a one in ten thousand chance that you're going
Speaker 1: to give COVID to somebody and they die. There's like
Speaker 1: a one in ten thousand chance that you'll get you'll
Speaker 1: get COVID unexpectedly, give it to somebody. That's the first leap,
Speaker 1: and then they have a ninety nine percent chance of
Speaker 1: surviving even if they get it. Are we're all going
Speaker 1: to hide from this now, We're all going to act like,
Speaker 1: remember Thanksgiving, this is a one time occasion we're talking
Speaker 1: about this year. This isn't do it every day. I'm
Speaker 1: not saying gathered together with your whole family every single day. Especially.
Speaker 1: It's all about risk, it's all about what's acceptable. But
Speaker 1: they don't view it that way. No, they want to
Speaker 1: panic you. And it's not just democrats. I mean here,
Speaker 1: Secretary as are you know, the bureaucrats. They don't want
Speaker 1: any heat coming down on them, so they take these positions.
Speaker 1: Here's HHS under Trump as are Play twelve. The safest
Speaker 1: way to celebrate Thanksgiving this year is at home with
Speaker 1: the people you live with, and through virtual celebrations, gathering
Speaker 1: indoors with people who aren't members of your household is
Speaker 1: a higher risk activity for spreading the virus. Please know
Speaker 1: that there is light at the end of the tunnel.
Speaker 1: Because of the sacrifices Americans have made and the hard
Speaker 1: work that so many have done, we will have the
Speaker 1: chance to celebrate holidays much more safely with family and
Speaker 1: friends not so far in the future. You know, the
Speaker 1: safest way to have sex is never have sex. It's true, Yeah,
Speaker 1: you never know, stuff can go wrong. I'm not even
Speaker 1: just talking about you know, people can pass diseases back
Speaker 1: and forth, but you know, you could have a heart attack,
Speaker 1: it happens, people die. Safest way to have sex never
Speaker 1: have sex. People still could have complications in childbirth even
Speaker 1: I mean I'm talking about even in the confines of
Speaker 1: a marriage. You know, sex can be dangerous, safest thing
Speaker 1: to do, but we never have it. Never do it.
Speaker 1: It's a health risk and it's the dumbest thing any
Speaker 1: human beings probably ever said. Right, But how different is
Speaker 1: it really from the from the attitude you're hearing these days,
Speaker 1: who only do virtual meetings, only do virtual Thanksgiving, don't
Speaker 1: see your family members, Like I've said, if you cut out,
Speaker 1: be you know, having any symptoms being sick. If you're sick,
Speaker 1: stay home, stay away from people that's already that's already
Speaker 1: taking out the symptomatic population from being able to spread
Speaker 1: this thing. One of the problems that exists. People get
Speaker 1: sick and then they're already around their family every day
Speaker 1: because it's in the home. Intrafamilial transmission is a primary
Speaker 1: risk of this, right, But they, oh, they can't tell
Speaker 1: people you have to live alone forever, so that doesn't work.
Speaker 1: But that's really where the risk is. The one time
Speaker 1: gathering where you're with a bunch of people statistically much
Speaker 1: lesser risk than what will happen for you know, I
Speaker 1: only I have one friend in New York City who
Speaker 1: died from COVID nineteen and it was my what was
Speaker 1: my friend's father, but I've known him for almost thirty
Speaker 1: years and he passed away from COVID and he got
Speaker 1: it from his wife, who's a healthcare worker, who also
Speaker 1: got it but she was fine. That's really a big play,
Speaker 1: and that was where there was maximum spread. And this
Speaker 1: is when things were going so badly in New York City.
Speaker 1: But what they're telling you here is effectively no risk
Speaker 1: is acceptable. Well, if you cut out people with symptoms
Speaker 1: from a gathering. You're already taking a very important step,
Speaker 1: you know, maybe limit how many long, you know, hugs
Speaker 1: and embraces you give more senior citizen members of your family.
Speaker 1: I mean, I'm telling you this right now, I could
Speaker 1: get COVID and I could die from COVID. I am
Speaker 1: not worried personally about COVID. Based on everything I read,
Speaker 1: based on everything I know, I'm not worried. And I
Speaker 1: could be wrong, But I still want to live my life.
Speaker 1: And I know there are a lot of other There
Speaker 1: are millions and millions of other people out there like
Speaker 1: me who feel like it's an acceptable risk. There are
Speaker 1: some activities I wouldn't do, I would choose not to
Speaker 1: do right now. I can wait, you know, I can
Speaker 1: wait to go to an indoor rock concert until the
Speaker 1: vaccine comes out, right, I mean, I'm willing to make
Speaker 1: some of those. But I mean, I can't go to
Speaker 1: a restaurant, I can't see my family. I can't go
Speaker 1: a you know, I can't go into a store. I
Speaker 1: can't go There's so many things, and for what it
Speaker 1: doesn't even work. They're putting all these impositions on you.
Speaker 1: You know, did they really think that if we have
Speaker 1: fewer Thanksgiving gatherings, there's not going to be a whole
Speaker 1: lot of COVID spread all over the country. Anyway, you
Speaker 1: still got to go to the grocery store, you still
Speaker 1: got to go to the drug store. People still have
Speaker 1: to live their lives, and living your life is a risk.
Speaker 1: Or you can listen to the panic mongers out there.
Speaker 1: You can listen to here's Biden's COVID advisor. This is
Speaker 1: the guy that wants a four to six week a
Speaker 1: four to six week lockdown straight nationwide. This is what
Speaker 1: you're gonna get with a Biden administration. And you know
Speaker 1: I told I told you we were going to go
Speaker 1: and do another lockdown as a country. And I've told
Speaker 1: you that the Biden administration, if it happens, was going
Speaker 1: to make everything worse. And here's exactly, here's the proof.
Speaker 1: Here's all you need to know play for. I think
Speaker 1: right now we all have to understand that we need
Speaker 1: current information on the number of cases. I think that
Speaker 1: the White House Task Force report issued yesterday or at
Speaker 1: least be made public yesterday, is right on the mark.
Speaker 1: We are really in a crisis stage. We have to
Speaker 1: be discussing what can we do? What do we do?
Speaker 1: You know, it's not just enough to help Americans understand
Speaker 1: you don't want to swap air. How do you incentivize them?
Speaker 1: How do you help them realize that this is what
Speaker 1: they want to do. And I've been saying for some time,
Speaker 1: we need fd our moments right now. We need somebody
Speaker 1: to say, this is what's happened, this is how bad
Speaker 1: it is. We're going to see hospitals collapsing in the
Speaker 1: next two to three weeks, and this is what we've
Speaker 1: got to do to address that. And just remember one thing.
Speaker 1: For the next three weeks, the cases are already in
Speaker 1: the pipeline. The people who are infected this morning will
Speaker 1: be the cases of next week in the hospital a
Speaker 1: few days after that, and will be in the intensive
Speaker 1: care rooms and dying after that. So even if we
Speaker 1: did everything we could right now, we would still not
Speaker 1: turn this thing around for literally three to four more weeks,
Speaker 1: just two more weeks, three more weeks. These guys always
Speaker 1: say that they're always wrong, but notice that he's already
Speaker 1: factored in here. If you do everything I say, it's
Speaker 1: still going to be really bad. But if you don't
Speaker 1: do what I say, it's going to be really bad.
Speaker 1: That's the choice we're always given. Do these horribly inconvenient, destructive,
Speaker 1: economically and emotionally and psychologically painful thing or else, And
Speaker 1: we still get the orlse. But they tell us the
Speaker 1: or else is not as horrible as it would have been.
Speaker 1: They're wrong. They're just wrong. What they tell us doesn't
Speaker 1: doesn't do anything. It doesn't make when I say this,
Speaker 1: if you could create a society where everyone wore their
Speaker 1: masks perfectly, where everyone's socially distanced exactly as they say
Speaker 1: they would, where everybody would be careful about washing their hands,
Speaker 1: if you could re engineer human beings so that we
Speaker 1: were robots and that we would all respond to the
Speaker 1: mandate like robots. We watch hands, we stay out way,
Speaker 1: we wear that mask. If we did that, maybe it
Speaker 1: would be able to, while we were still doing that,
Speaker 1: dramatically curb infections. But the only thing that really brings
Speaker 1: infections down is telling you you have to stay away
Speaker 1: from other human beings, keep you in your home. This
Speaker 1: mask thing is fantasy land stuff that it's going to break,
Speaker 1: break the spread of the infection once it's already out there.
Speaker 1: We've already seen it's it's it's absurd, and you could say, oh, buck,
Speaker 1: but the science. Yeah, but people don't wear their masks perfectly.
Speaker 1: Every time I get on the elevator in my building
Speaker 1: and everyone here is panic. People are you know, fidgeting
Speaker 1: with their mask, their nose is. They're breathing through their nose,
Speaker 1: which people believe might actually be where the worst viral
Speaker 1: particles might reside. They're breathing through their nose, not through
Speaker 1: the mask. You know, they pull their mask down to cough.
Speaker 1: I can't tell you how many people I see pull
Speaker 1: their mask down to cough. Remember, all this has to
Speaker 1: do to be an ongoing pandemic. Every person who's sick
Speaker 1: gets one person sick. If it's an R one a
Speaker 1: reproduction rate of one, it turns into exponential pandemic very quickly.
Speaker 1: So these mandates are all based on the idea that
Speaker 1: people are going to be so good with the mandate
Speaker 1: that they won't even expose one person if they get sick.
Speaker 1: Does anyone really think they're that good at this. They're
Speaker 1: not going to breathe air into a room. It's aerosol
Speaker 1: eyes you don't even have. You can get infected, and
Speaker 1: they don't want to talk about this, but the studies
Speaker 1: have shown this so far. You can get infected walking
Speaker 1: to a room after somebody's already been in there. How
Speaker 1: are you going to control for this? Viruses have been
Speaker 1: around as long as human beings have been around friends,
Speaker 1: they've they've adapted to continue to spread. Why they exist,
Speaker 1: that's a whole other question. Who knows. But we have
Speaker 1: not defeated aerosolis virus with these measures and we're not
Speaker 1: going to. So take basic precautions to limit your risk
Speaker 1: and then go forward and live your life as you
Speaker 1: see fit, or just keep obeying the tyrants and see
Speaker 1: see how you feel. See where you are in nine months,
Speaker 1: when maybe maybe they'll start to say enough people have
Speaker 1: gotten vaccinated that you don't have to live in fear anymore.
Speaker 1: We'll see what the country looks like. Then you're in
Speaker 1: the freedom hud. This is the Buck Sex and Show podcast.
Speaker 1: You may not have ever heard this one so directly before,
Speaker 1: but Cuomo wants you to know. Governor Cuomo Oh wants
Speaker 1: you to know that if you get COVID, it's probably
Speaker 1: your fault. This is what he says. Play twenty and
Speaker 1: just to make it very simple, if you're socially distanced,
Speaker 1: and you wore a mask and you were smart, none
Speaker 1: of this would be a problem. It's all self imposed.
Speaker 1: It's all self imposed. If you didn't need to cheesecake,
Speaker 1: you wouldn't have a weight problem. It's all self imposed.
Speaker 1: That's moronic. I mean, truly, he's truly a dumbass. I
Speaker 1: don't know what else to say about it. What it's
Speaker 1: your fault. If you catch a sub microscopic aerosolized virus
Speaker 1: that's in wide circulation all across the country, people with
Speaker 1: masks on get sick. We know that for a fact.
Speaker 1: It does happen. There's no question about that mask wearers
Speaker 1: get sick. In fact, there's some data to suggest that
Speaker 1: it's mostly mask wearers in a lot of places who
Speaker 1: get sick. Now that that may be because of such
Speaker 1: high mask adoption and rates, but the point is that
Speaker 1: it's people wearing masks that are getting sick in a
Speaker 1: lot of places. Maybe yeah, sure they would have gotten
Speaker 1: sick anyway, But the masks aren't some game changer for them,
Speaker 1: that's for sure. But he's straight up saying it's your fault.
Speaker 1: He is taking the position here that the reason COVID
Speaker 1: is hitting certain people is because you don't listen enough
Speaker 1: to their demands. You don't listen enough to what they
Speaker 1: tell you you have to do. I've been telling you
Speaker 1: this all along. This continues to be their fallback. This
Speaker 1: continues to be their fallback. And then also just they
Speaker 1: can't help but try to take shots at Trump over
Speaker 1: this vaccine. I mean, right now, instead of saying, Wow,
Speaker 1: what a huge accomplishment of vaccine is, you got Biden
Speaker 1: and the rest of them pretending that because there's not
Speaker 1: enough of a transition already in place here whatever, that
Speaker 1: means that the virus, or rather that the vaccine is
Speaker 1: going to be delayed. So now they're they're leveraging this
Speaker 1: once again. It wasn't just enough to weaponize COVID as
Speaker 1: Trump is responsible for all the deaths. It's Trump's fault.
Speaker 1: It's so terrible. It's all on him, right, they did that,
Speaker 1: We know that, But beyond that, they've now said that
Speaker 1: if the virus continues into the next year, it's because
Speaker 1: of the recklessness of Trump in the transition, right, because
Speaker 1: of the vaccine play nineteen. We get to the point
Speaker 1: where we have a sense of when these vaccines comes out,
Speaker 1: how they'll be distributed, who'll be first in line, what
Speaker 1: the plan is, or over three hundred million Americans and
Speaker 1: beyond our border that are going to have to be
Speaker 1: taken care of. And there's a whole lot of things
Speaker 1: that are just we just don't have available to us,
Speaker 1: which unless it's made available soon, we're going to behind
Speaker 1: by weeks or months being able to put together the
Speaker 1: whole initiative relating to the biggest traumise we have with
Speaker 1: two drug companies coming along and finding nine effectivest efficiency
Speaker 1: in the vaccines, which is enormous traumise. So I just
Speaker 1: want to tell you that that's the only slowdown right
Speaker 1: now that we have. Yeah, it's all it's all about
Speaker 1: the slow vaccine rollout. That's Trump's fault. Not a lot
Speaker 1: of love given the administration for being the only reason
Speaker 1: we have the vaccine reductioned to the only reason it
Speaker 1: was in partnership with major drug companies, and those drug companies,
Speaker 1: a lot of beaten up on big pharma. Not a
Speaker 1: lot of people taking a moment to say, hey, big farmer,
Speaker 1: thank you for helping to maybe save the planet here
Speaker 1: pretty soon. So that's worth noting too. Thanks for listening
Speaker 1: to The Bus Sesson Show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on
Speaker 1: Apple podcasts, the iHeartRadio app, or wherever you get your podcasts.
Speaker 1: And even The New York Times wrote articles about how
Speaker 1: dangerous mail voting, mail and voting was, and this is
Speaker 1: the first time we ever did it on MASS and
Speaker 1: I think we proved that all three of profits. It's
Speaker 1: not only susceptible to fraud, it is easily susceptible to fraud,
Speaker 1: particularly if you have a plan or scheme, which sounds
Speaker 1: eerily similar to what Joe Biden told us a few
Speaker 1: days before the election that he had the best vote
Speaker 1: of fraud team in the world. Well, they were good.
Speaker 1: I don't know that they were that good because they
Speaker 1: made significant mistakes like all crooks do, and we caught him.
Speaker 1: Big updates today, long press conference from the Trump campaign
Speaker 1: legal team, the senior legal advisors to the Trump campaign
Speaker 1: talking about the various legal challenges. There was Giuliani you
Speaker 1: heard today from Udy Giuliani, Jenna Ellis, who have talked
Speaker 1: to multiple times in the last few weeks about this,
Speaker 1: and Sidney Powell, who is perhaps best known for really
Speaker 1: being the great champion of General Flynn and the injustice
Speaker 1: done to him, and she was completely correct on all
Speaker 1: of that. She was absolutely spot on. And here's what
Speaker 1: we what we gathered from today, the Democrat position on
Speaker 1: things like voting in Pennsylvania, the voter security measures, on
Speaker 1: matching matching signatures in Georgia, on all these different all
Speaker 1: these different things you have in place. It's it's in
Speaker 1: part because if you do get into a super tight
Speaker 1: election and it does matter that only every legal ballot
Speaker 1: be counted, you need to have the mechanisms there. You
Speaker 1: need to have those things to check right. And if
Speaker 1: you don't, and Democrats made sure there was a bare
Speaker 1: minimum of them, how can you ever know people seeing
Speaker 1: what they believe to be fraud. Let's say somebody sat
Speaker 1: there who was a poll worker in Philadelphia and filled
Speaker 1: out one hundred ballots and someone saw him do that
Speaker 1: for Biden. Unless they have video, unless they confronted them
Speaker 1: right then and there, there's no way to prove all
Speaker 1: it is is ballots for Biden if they're taken out
Speaker 1: of the security envelope, If if they get to the
Speaker 1: point where they can just fill out the ballot out
Speaker 1: the ballot center, and there's now I understand that they're
Speaker 1: supposed to be observers to prevent this, but when they
Speaker 1: saw things that don't make sense, there's it's very hard
Speaker 1: to have after the fact proof of it. So when
Speaker 1: people think they're seeing fraud, they may have, but then
Speaker 1: how do you prove it? And this has been my
Speaker 1: concern along with these legal challenges. But Giuliani Ellis Powell,
Speaker 1: they seem very confident that they will be able to
Speaker 1: prove this. From this news conference is right around lunchtime
Speaker 1: today is when they had the news conference here more
Speaker 1: Rudy Giuliani led has essentially provided the opening statement, if
Speaker 1: you will, from his side on this. Prusi and Mark
Speaker 1: play the next one, which to any experienced investigator prosecutor
Speaker 1: would suggest that there was a plan from a centralized
Speaker 1: place to execute these various acts of voter fraud, specifically
Speaker 1: focused on big cities and specifically focused on as you
Speaker 1: would imagine, big cities controlled by Democrats, and particularly focused
Speaker 1: on big cities had had a long history of corruption.
Speaker 1: The number of voter fraud cases in Philadelphia could fill
Speaker 1: a library. Just a few weeks ago it was a
Speaker 1: conviction for voter fraud, and one two weeks before that.
Speaker 1: Now let's understand, Juliani here isn't just talking about irregularity.
Speaker 1: There are definitely irregularities, and anyone who would claim that
Speaker 1: there would not be irregularities in a situation like this
Speaker 1: is delusional because that could even be just good faith
Speaker 1: errors that occur an election of this size, Right, irregularities
Speaker 1: are going to happen. The issue then becomes were they
Speaker 1: happening at enough of a scale that it could have
Speaker 1: changed the result in anyone's state. But Giuliani here is
Speaker 1: asserting systemic intentional fraud. He's saying that there were people
Speaker 1: that tried to steal this election, and he can prove it.
Speaker 1: Now he does have evidence of it, because affidavits do
Speaker 1: count as evidence. But is it enough to prove to
Speaker 1: a judge? Right, because that's who this would go to.
Speaker 1: This is not going to be like a go to
Speaker 1: a jury trial, So go to a judge. Is there
Speaker 1: enough to convince a judge to toss out balance? It's
Speaker 1: going to be a lot of pressure here. There's a
Speaker 1: lot that you're going to hear from people about how
Speaker 1: this is destroying our democracy, about this is this is
Speaker 1: now they're going to lecturing us about overturning the election.
Speaker 1: We'll get to that at a moment, but here's more
Speaker 1: of of what Giuliani's allegations are, because I want you
Speaker 1: to hear from them in specifics as of today. This
Speaker 1: is the latest from the campaign. Play it we could
Speaker 1: do like a did you all watch My cousin Vinnie?
Speaker 1: Did you know the movie? It's one of my favorite
Speaker 1: law movies because he comes from Brooklyn. And when the
Speaker 1: nice lady who said she saw and then he uh,
Speaker 1: he says to her, how many fingers do I? How
Speaker 1: many fingers will I? Got up? And she says, uh three, Well,
Speaker 1: she was too far away to see it was only two.
Speaker 1: These people were further away than my cousin Vinnie was
Speaker 1: from the witness. They couldn't see a thing. Now, I
Speaker 1: don't know you're gonna tell me that sixty people are lying.
Speaker 1: They didn't just tell me this. They swore under penalty
Speaker 1: of perjury, which is something no Democrats ever done. You
Speaker 1: don't even ask Biden about this. You don't put them
Speaker 1: under penalty. Why were people moved away? So this became
Speaker 1: the issue, and there was this huge fight over access
Speaker 1: for observers. This was one of the big issues. Why
Speaker 1: would they move them away in these democrat areas, but nowhere,
Speaker 1: nowhere else, Why was there an effort to push back?
Speaker 1: You know, twenty feet? I mean, think about how far
Speaker 1: twenty feet is. Can you see what someone's doing with
Speaker 1: a ballot from twenty feet away? Imagine you're imagine you're
Speaker 1: a teacher and you're proctoring a final exam. If you
Speaker 1: had to be the proctor, and you know how the
Speaker 1: teacher walks among the students, which I always found a
Speaker 1: kind of ominous, you know, prison guard vibe. But anyway
Speaker 1: they walk among the students. I don't know if they
Speaker 1: did that in your school, in my Jesuit school, in
Speaker 1: high school, they certainly did. And you know that way,
Speaker 1: you never knew when they were coming your way. So
Speaker 1: if you had a crib sheet, if you were going
Speaker 1: to look on someone else's paper, you better be careful
Speaker 1: because the eyes were moving right, people were walking around
Speaker 1: to check. If they had to do that from outside
Speaker 1: in the hallway looking through the window, you'd have a
Speaker 1: whole lot more cheating going on, wouldn't you, Because how
Speaker 1: could they see what you have in your hand? How
Speaker 1: could they see where your eyes are going. That's what
Speaker 1: Juliani's alleging here about ballots. Now you could say, all
Speaker 1: that seems a little bit conspiratorial or whatever, But why
Speaker 1: would they move them so far away? Oh, COVID, give
Speaker 1: me a break. I went in. First of all, they're
Speaker 1: all masked. I thought masks protect us, So now we
Speaker 1: didn't masks and twenty feet of social distancing, Remember it
Speaker 1: wasn't it wasn't six feet away. Six feet away is
Speaker 1: you could basically reach out. People have this funny idea
Speaker 1: that six feet is really far. It's not. Actually, you know,
Speaker 1: I'm six feet tall. My body length is not that
Speaker 1: far away for somebody to be able to see somebody
Speaker 1: be able to see what they're doing, So why move
Speaker 1: them so far away. They don't have a good answer
Speaker 1: for this, other than they say, COVID. We're so scared
Speaker 1: of COVID. I'm sure some of the same people involved
Speaker 1: in this weren't so scared of COVID when they went
Speaker 1: out into the street. I'm sure they weren't so scared
Speaker 1: of COVID when they were, you know, celebrating what they
Speaker 1: thought was a Biden victory, but terrified of it when
Speaker 1: it came to counting ballots. And some Democrats strongholds. Friends,
Speaker 1: I'm sorry, this is this is fishy. This situation is problematic.
Speaker 1: Let's be honest about that. Okay, more from Jail. By
Speaker 1: the way, I liked that he brought in my cousin Vidie.
Speaker 1: It is a great movie. Really enjoy that one, producer, Mark,
Speaker 1: even you like my guns and Vinnie right, great movie,
Speaker 1: of course, fantastic. Yeah, great movie. You know, there's so
Speaker 1: much about probably Marissa Tomay's finest work. And really Joe
Speaker 1: Pesci in his top five, I would say, so, great film.
Speaker 1: But he's right. Remember they showed the old lady. She tries,
Speaker 1: she's not trying to lie, but she can't see that well.
Speaker 1: And so her witness testimony was not that good because
Speaker 1: she was too far away. If you're supposed to witness
Speaker 1: possible ballot fraud and you're too far away, guess what,
Speaker 1: it's not gonna work. I'm not gonna work. So now
Speaker 1: there's more from Giuliani, Play it instead of come forward
Speaker 1: or extraordinary extraordinary number of people, extraordinary number of witnesses.
Speaker 1: And what emerged very quickly is there's not a singular
Speaker 1: voter fraud in one state. This pattern repeats itself in
Speaker 1: a number of states almost exactly the same pattern, which
Speaker 1: to any experienced investigator prosecutor, would suggest that there was
Speaker 1: a plan from a centralized place to execute these various
Speaker 1: acts of voter fraud, specifically focused on big cities and
Speaker 1: specifically focused on as you would imagine, big cities controlled
Speaker 1: by Democrats, and particularly focused on big cities had to
Speaker 1: have a long history of corruption. The number of voter
Speaker 1: fraud cases in Philadelphia could fill a library. Just a
Speaker 1: few weeks ago it was a conviction for voter fraud,
Speaker 1: and one two weeks before that. And I've often said,
Speaker 1: I guess sarcastically, but it's true. Right, Okay, so we
Speaker 1: heard this part of it. So I just want to say,
Speaker 1: let's understand that he is alleging a widespread conspiracy. He is,
Speaker 1: That's what That's what Rudy Giuliani is saying happened here.
Speaker 1: The last time that people laughed at him and said
Speaker 1: he didn't know what he was talking about was around
Speaker 1: Hunter Biden, who got the last laugh there? Who was
Speaker 1: telling the truth and who wasn't. He is saying there
Speaker 1: is a there was a conspiracy in multiple states where
Speaker 1: there are certainly a lot of statistical anomalies and very fishy,
Speaker 1: very strange things happening. He's saying that stuff went on
Speaker 1: there that can only be explained by intentional fraud and
Speaker 1: a widespread conspiracy. Now, these are big allegations. I get it.
Speaker 1: Affidavits are evidence. My concern is this, and you know,
Speaker 1: you know my promise to you, I tell you the truth.
Speaker 1: I know right now it's good for ratings and for
Speaker 1: a lot of people on the right. It's just go
Speaker 1: all in and promise people any moment now, any moment now,
Speaker 1: the smoking gun will emerge. This is going to be
Speaker 1: trench warfare in these courts. It's going to be little
Speaker 1: bits here and there. And there's not endless time here.
Speaker 1: There are deadlines that must be met, right the state certification,
Speaker 1: the electoral College, and then inauguration that those are going
Speaker 1: to happen. There's no delaying those things. The constitution does
Speaker 1: not allow for a delay of those things, so or
Speaker 1: I should say, a delay of inauguration and the passing
Speaker 1: of power or the continuation of the current administration. So
Speaker 1: what they're going to have to do, and this is
Speaker 1: where I have concerns, is convince a number of judges
Speaker 1: that the fraud is clear enough and egregious enough that
Speaker 1: they're going to toss out large numbers of ballots. Now,
Speaker 1: the law may say that that is what should be done,
Speaker 1: and the preponderance of evidence may be with the Juliani
Speaker 1: team here for the Trump campaign, what I'm telling you
Speaker 1: my concern is, I do not see judges in states
Speaker 1: like Pennsylvania and Georgia and Michigan. I do not see
Speaker 1: them being willing to do that under almost any circumstance. Now,
Speaker 1: I understand that's not what people want to hear. Right now.
Speaker 1: I'm also a guy who told you the bar probe
Speaker 1: was not I'm sorry, the Durham probe was not going
Speaker 1: to arrest anybody, and it was going to probably be
Speaker 1: a big nothing burger. And I was right. Those you've
Speaker 1: been with me for years. No him as the guy
Speaker 1: who told you that Benghazi once Obama won reelection, ben
Speaker 1: Ghazzi was just a you know, Trey Goudie's auditioning for
Speaker 1: a Fox News contributorship, and with all those hearings, that's
Speaker 1: all that, that's all that that was going to turn into.
Speaker 1: Nobody was going to jail, Nobody's you know, nothing was
Speaker 1: really happening. No, accountability. So unfortunately, I'm feeling here like
Speaker 1: we're going to present all this evidence, or the Trump
Speaker 1: team is going to present all this evidence, it'll be there.
Speaker 1: You have all these people that are swearing under penalty
Speaker 1: of perjury, you have all these numbers that don't make sense,
Speaker 1: one hundred thousand votes just for Biden in Georgia, and
Speaker 1: then at the end of the day, when all's said
Speaker 1: and done, the judge will just say not convinced. Don't
Speaker 1: you think that judge wants to be patted on the
Speaker 1: back at the con club. Don't you think that judge
Speaker 1: wants to be congratulated by parents when they go to
Speaker 1: pick up their kids at school. But how they did
Speaker 1: the right thing for the Constitution by not letting Trump
Speaker 1: steal the election. It's like the John Roberts phenomenon. Why
Speaker 1: do you think John Roberts sells out his constitutional principles
Speaker 1: on a regular basis because he wants to be that
Speaker 1: guy that kind of keeps it all going and is
Speaker 1: not a big fighter, and he wants to protect the institution.
Speaker 1: Just cave a little bit to the Libs, Just cave
Speaker 1: a little bit. There's a lot of sweet stuff that
Speaker 1: comes your way if you sell out your own side,
Speaker 1: and that's for conservative judges. Do you think an active
Speaker 1: is liberal judge is nine a million years right. You
Speaker 1: think somebody who's a leftist on the court. You think
Speaker 1: a soda mayor on the appeals court or at a
Speaker 1: federal court in Pennsylvania, in Michigan, somebody of her mindset
Speaker 1: is gonna say, yeah, let's throw out all these votes.
Speaker 1: This is this is my concern, friends, This is the
Speaker 1: challenge that I'm not sure they can get beyond. We
Speaker 1: will see. I'm keeping the faith, you're in the freedom.
Speaker 1: This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast. They are going
Speaker 1: to turn up this pressure campaign with everything they've got.
Speaker 1: You can already see it happening. Here's CNN's sort of
Speaker 1: bench warmer for the other anchors, John Avalon. Here he
Speaker 1: is telling you that this is time for other Republicans
Speaker 1: need to step in here, play five. This is a
Speaker 1: time for choosing, and at this point, silence is complicity.
Speaker 1: Republicans need to decide whether they will condone an outright
Speaker 1: attempt to overturn the election. This is a test of
Speaker 1: whether you believe in our country more than a cult
Speaker 1: of personality, and it shouldn't be a tough call. It's
Speaker 1: Donald Trump versus democracy? Which side are you on? It's
Speaker 1: just not simple. It's Donald Trump versus democracy. No, it's
Speaker 1: not that simple. Actually, it's we're legally cast ballot, the
Speaker 1: only ones, the only ones that were allowed. Yeah, that's
Speaker 1: what it really comes down to. We're legally cast ballots,
Speaker 1: the only ones that were counted in this whole process.
Speaker 1: But all the media, you know, they're you know what
Speaker 1: they're dangling out there right now, jump ship from Trump,
Speaker 1: come over to our side. We'll give you a contributorship.
Speaker 1: We'll throw you one hundred grand to appear on TV
Speaker 1: once a week. That's what contributorships often are at these places,
Speaker 1: and that's a starter. They give me a lot more
Speaker 1: than me a million dollars a year. For some people.
Speaker 1: If you're on TV when they say get them, have
Speaker 1: to do you have them do your makeup, the whole thing.
Speaker 1: Joe Scarborough, he's also out there saying the same kind
Speaker 1: of stuff. Play six. They're admitting in front of courts
Speaker 1: there is no fraud is a matter of law. They're
Speaker 1: admitting there's no way forward in any of these legal challenges.
Speaker 1: So now they're moving on and They're going to try
Speaker 1: to disrupt the electors doing something that is grossly on democratic,
Speaker 1: grossly un American, and something that will stay with this
Speaker 1: Republican party for years to come. They know it's over,
Speaker 1: and yet they won't do anything about it. Willie, We've
Speaker 1: ridden the riptide long enough. It's time for America to
Speaker 1: move forward, to get out of it, start swimming back
Speaker 1: towards the shore and get on firm ground. What is
Speaker 1: undemocratic about using due process in the court system to
Speaker 1: bring legal challenges in a dispute. How is that undemocratic?
Speaker 1: That's why we have a court system. There have been
Speaker 1: elections determined by fraud in the past. There have been
Speaker 1: presidential elections that went to court. We all know about
Speaker 1: Bush v. Gore. So why is this undemocratic? They use
Speaker 1: these terms as if they have no actual meaning. They
Speaker 1: just use them because they think it makes them sound fancy,
Speaker 1: or if you argue with them, you must be undemocratic.
Speaker 1: But then again, if you're looking to cable news in
Speaker 1: general for your analysis of what is good and constitutional,
Speaker 1: you will generally be generally be very disappointed. Thanks for listening.
Speaker 1: To remember to subscribe on Apple podcasts. The iHeart radio
Speaker 1: app or wherever you get your podcasts. It's harsany time.
Speaker 1: Our buddy David Harsany from National Review in the mix
Speaker 1: to tell us everything that's going on this week. Is
Speaker 1: that the Sage of the Beltway. I don't know he
Speaker 1: lives inside DC somewhere, so or in the in the Beltway.
Speaker 1: At least I know you're you're you're not not a
Speaker 1: swamp creature, but you are swamp adjacent. So at least
Speaker 1: you get a good view of all those swampy things
Speaker 1: that are going on there. You can tell us what's happening.
Speaker 1: Let's let's start with where where are lockdowns? You know,
Speaker 1: up up here in New York City. It's very clear
Speaker 1: we're we're going into it's going to be the same game. Okay, guys,
Speaker 1: we're just doing this thing. But in two weeks we'll reevaluate.
Speaker 1: And I want to say, the dumb ass, counterproductive thing
Speaker 1: you're doing isn't going to stop this. So in two
Speaker 1: weeks it'll be you, guys didn't do a good enough job,
Speaker 1: so we got to do this other terrible thing. Now
Speaker 1: we can all see it coming. How's it going down
Speaker 1: by around you? I'm slightly confused, because I Andrew Cuomo
Speaker 1: had a book out about how he got the lid
Speaker 1: on this and it was over and he handled it
Speaker 1: so well. And yet now we're back to what was
Speaker 1: happening before. Right, you know, it's the same thing everywhere.
Speaker 1: You know, what bothers me most about the stuff? A
Speaker 1: few things bother me. But one thing that bothers me
Speaker 1: is that no one's even concerned that we have I
Speaker 1: mean that I I shouldn't say no one, but people aren't
Speaker 1: seemed to be very concerned that we have governors acting
Speaker 1: like dictators. There's literally no legislatures in session passing these
Speaker 1: these restrictions or laws. It's just whatever the governor wants.
Speaker 1: How long does an emergency last? Coronavirus is a serious pandemic.
Speaker 1: It's killed two hundred thousand people, but there is a
Speaker 1: ninety nine percent or above, you know, survival rate for
Speaker 1: people who get it. Is that the kind of emergency
Speaker 1: that allows governors to do whatever they want, close churches,
Speaker 1: stop people from seeing their families. I mean, it's just
Speaker 1: it's a it's an insanity. And it seems to me, David,
Speaker 1: that there's not nearly, not nearly the pushback on this
Speaker 1: that I would have expected. And look, I'm just gonna
Speaker 1: say it, I think the Trump administration on this has
Speaker 1: been and I think a lot of it was driven
Speaker 1: by politics and the need to not continue to get
Speaker 1: beat up, you know, with the COVID attacks leading up
Speaker 1: to the election. But the DOJ, I mean, I'm sorry.
Speaker 1: You can have governors telling people that they can't go
Speaker 1: to church. You can't have mayors staking out you know,
Speaker 1: Orthodox Jewish communities like they're selling heroin out of the
Speaker 1: back of the synagogue just because they actually want to
Speaker 1: gather and worship and do their religion. I mean, it's
Speaker 1: crazy to me, especially when you have two sets of rules.
Speaker 1: You have one set of rules for Hasidic Jews in Brooklyn,
Speaker 1: and you have another set of rules for BLM protesters
Speaker 1: and another set of rule rules for people celebrating that
Speaker 1: Trump lost the election. You know, and at some point
Speaker 1: that this hype or focus on religious Jewish people starts
Speaker 1: to seem a bit anti Semitic. And I'm not you know,
Speaker 1: I don't want to just throw that around, but I
Speaker 1: would I guarantee you that that wouldn't be the case
Speaker 1: for any sort of you know, African American church in Brooklyn,
Speaker 1: and it's it's getting to be quite quite ugly, I think,
Speaker 1: because you create the perception that it's Hosidic Jews who
Speaker 1: are like spreading this. But yet you know, it spreads
Speaker 1: in all states. It spreads all over the place. It
Speaker 1: spreads in states. I mean, there are spikes in states
Speaker 1: where there are no mask mandates, and there are spikes
Speaker 1: in states where there are. It's clearly something that is
Speaker 1: running through society. And in the same thing in Europe,
Speaker 1: no matter what kind of lockdowns you have, unless you're
Speaker 1: a really small country, and this idea that we can
Speaker 1: that there's some exemption in the constitution that allows you
Speaker 1: to simply make any rule you want because of coronavirus,
Speaker 1: it's such a dangerous thing. We only we have these
Speaker 1: rules specifically so that when there are times of emergence
Speaker 1: and there are times where someone will abuse their power,
Speaker 1: that it withholds them back. But yet it doesn't seem
Speaker 1: to be the case. And you know, maybe we need
Speaker 1: more lawsuits. I don't know, but you know, the idea
Speaker 1: that you can just shut a church down or shut
Speaker 1: a gun show down, as they did today in Virginia.
Speaker 1: These are constitutional rights. It doesn't say that they're constitutional rights,
Speaker 1: except when you get sick it. You know, there's it
Speaker 1: is what it is, and no one seems to want
Speaker 1: to defend it. David, I know this sounds perhaps a
Speaker 1: bit extreme to some, or maybe this sounds like it's exaggeration,
Speaker 1: but I really do believe it would be fair to
Speaker 1: say that parts of the Bill of Rights have been
Speaker 1: suspended during COVID. I mean, when you have governors, as
Speaker 1: we've been talking about, telling people we will arrest you
Speaker 1: if you show up to your church because we say so,
Speaker 1: that feels like the First Amendment is null and void.
Speaker 1: When you have you know, some people are are confronted
Speaker 1: with police and fines and dispersal orders for gathering outside
Speaker 1: anti lockdown protesters, while others are celebrated by the authorities
Speaker 1: BLM protests and riots and looting. Of course, that feels
Speaker 1: like a violation of equal protection. I feel like we
Speaker 1: need to start using those terms. I completely agree with you.
Speaker 1: Obviously you have politicians. Give you an example, the Attorney
Speaker 1: general in Virginia who is online celebrating the idea that
Speaker 1: he's shutting down gun shows, which are no more dangerous
Speaker 1: than going to a walmark, which is open because it's guns,
Speaker 1: and because he wants to undermine the Second Amendment, and
Speaker 1: because he doesn't want citizens to have to practice their
Speaker 1: Second Amendment rights. And the same goes with churches, the
Speaker 1: kind of hypocrisy in coverage of sitting Jews getting together
Speaker 1: or church or megachurch or people getting together, and then
Speaker 1: BLM protests and the celebrations that went on in Times
Speaker 1: Square and elsewhere when you know, on election night, it
Speaker 1: is distressing if you care about the First and second Amendment,
Speaker 1: and the fourth and the fifth and even the tenth Amendment,
Speaker 1: and the way that people are acting in the way
Speaker 1: Joe Biden is now talking about national mandates, he is
Speaker 1: not empowered to do that. Governors are not empowered to
Speaker 1: stop people from going to church or visiting their families
Speaker 1: or interacting. And you know, just because we have an
Speaker 1: emergency doesn't mean that those things are no longer active.
Speaker 1: So I think this votes poorly for us if we
Speaker 1: had some kind of bigger emergency, not just one that is.
Speaker 1: And don't get me wrong, I'm not downplaying what coronavirus is,
Speaker 1: but it is something that most people will survive and
Speaker 1: most people will be okay with, So you know, nine percent,
Speaker 1: whatever the number is, and the idea that that is
Speaker 1: enough to just suspend the Constitution. I can't imagine what
Speaker 1: would happen if we'd had some you know, widespread emergency
Speaker 1: that affected everyone. We're speaking of David Harsanyi. He's a
Speaker 1: senior writer at National Review. David even good old Nicholas Kristoff. Honestly,
Speaker 1: I know some people find him to be not that
Speaker 1: smug and annoying. I find him horrifically smug and annoying.
Speaker 1: I'm not a I'm not a Christoff person at all,
Speaker 1: and having met him a couple of times and how
Speaker 1: to deal with him on TV. But even he admits
Speaker 1: now that Trump was right about schools, that the Republicans
Speaker 1: were right about schools. There is no argument anymore. Remember
Speaker 1: back in August when they were talking about how, oh,
Speaker 1: schools will be super spreaders and the kids will die
Speaker 1: and basically no kids die. I mean, I'm being serious,
Speaker 1: You're talking about the same number of kids die nationwide.
Speaker 1: I'm wanna say kids. I'm talking about under the age
Speaker 1: of at dying from COVID nationwide, as you know, die
Speaker 1: from meningitis in any given year, which is a disease
Speaker 1: that can kill you and does spread in schools and
Speaker 1: prisons and places like that, and yet we're still shutting.
Speaker 1: We shut down schools in New York City. I mean,
Speaker 1: who the journos don't they have children? Don't they understand
Speaker 1: how insane this is? When even Nicholas Christophe admits that
Speaker 1: the lockdowners were wrong and that Trump and the Republicans
Speaker 1: on schools were right. How does this not penetrate? Yeah,
Speaker 1: I don't know the answer to that. I would say
Speaker 1: that hopefully, I mean this is hopefully people realize that
Speaker 1: this is the teachers unions most mostly in their power,
Speaker 1: especially in places like New York City, where they get
Speaker 1: this done for teachers, not for students. We know that
Speaker 1: they're not really spreaders. We know that I forgot what
Speaker 1: the infection rate is, but it's minuscule, like point two
Speaker 1: three or something like that. They are not super spreaders.
Speaker 1: It is not dangerous for children. For most children probably
Speaker 1: in more danger of being at home, and they're certainly
Speaker 1: in a worse situation for their academic future and for
Speaker 1: their mental well being sitting at home. And then think
Speaker 1: about all the parents who now can't go and work
Speaker 1: or you know, people who don't have a lot of money,
Speaker 1: who you know, who can hire uh, you know, babysitters
Speaker 1: and so on. It's just it's a it's a tragic situation.
Speaker 1: And to go back and forth the way they do
Speaker 1: on a whim without explaining it really. I mean, you
Speaker 1: saw Cooma the other day at the press conference yelling
Speaker 1: at a reporter we dare to ask him a question
Speaker 1: about this. It's a it's a it's a generational disaster,
Speaker 1: or can can become one if we continue acting this way.
Speaker 1: We don't even you know, vaccines are coming, but we
Speaker 1: don't know exactly how that plays out. So you can
Speaker 1: go into another year with this. This is you're taking
Speaker 1: two three years of a child's life by not letting
Speaker 1: them go to school. And there's you know, not to
Speaker 1: get too deeply into it, but you know, teachers can
Speaker 1: assess learning disabilities, or they can assess mental problems or
Speaker 1: things like that, or or depression. You know a lot
Speaker 1: of teachers are the ones who see that, and they're
Speaker 1: not being able to identify those problems, and you're just
Speaker 1: creating an immense generational problem. I think. I mean, I remember, David,
Speaker 1: I'm somebody I fell behind in school at a young age.
Speaker 1: They thought I was going to have to go to
Speaker 1: a special school. I had, which is interesting for somebody
Speaker 1: who's a radio host. Now, for ten years I had
Speaker 1: a speech impediment. And all of this was around second grade,
Speaker 1: third grade, very important formative years. If I had to
Speaker 1: stay at home and stare at a computer screen and
Speaker 1: did just click on things, I mean, you know, I
Speaker 1: don't even know what would have happened. Right, I turned
Speaker 1: all that stuff around and had a much better brighter
Speaker 1: academic future than anybody would have thought at that point.
Speaker 1: But the point, but I'm just making this point that
Speaker 1: what you're saying is so spot on here there's no
Speaker 1: real counter argument to it. But the Democrats, it's just
Speaker 1: all about power and what they want. I mean, it
Speaker 1: is about the teachers, unions and honestly just letting a
Speaker 1: bunch of lazy asses stay at home and get a paycheck.
Speaker 1: I mean, the people that work at my local grocery store.
Speaker 1: God bless the clerks, the manager. They've been there every
Speaker 1: day of COVID. They've never shut down, They've showed up
Speaker 1: to do their jobs. They're all still alive, they're all
Speaker 1: still fine. They can show up to make sure that
Speaker 1: my neighborhood's got groceries. But you know, fourth grade teachers
Speaker 1: who are mostly in their thirties and forties, if not younger,
Speaker 1: they can't do their jobs. Right. Part of this is,
Speaker 1: and I hate to get two politicals, that they have
Speaker 1: a monopoly on schools. So there's no you know, I'm
Speaker 1: not sure about New York, but I think that the
Speaker 1: private schools are going to continue to be open at
Speaker 1: Catholic schools and so on, so you can't even make decisions.
Speaker 1: And most people can't afford to send their kids to
Speaker 1: private schools, so they're stuck in these schools that are
Speaker 1: closed down, and they don't have much of a say
Speaker 1: in it because it doesn't even go through the legislature.
Speaker 1: I don't think, right. I think Quoma just closes the
Speaker 1: schools down when he feels like it or Debazi. Yeah,
Speaker 1: it's just based on arbitrary numbers that they set up. Yeah, right,
Speaker 1: And there's no evidence that these are super spreaders. If
Speaker 1: you look to Europe, it has no correlation between those
Speaker 1: things as far as I can tell. You know, it's
Speaker 1: funny because when this first started, I was very willing
Speaker 1: to listen to the lockdown people, the mask people, everything
Speaker 1: like that. I want everyone to be safe. I want
Speaker 1: my neighbor to feel safe when I'm around them, etc.
Speaker 1: But some things like masks. You know, there's all kinds
Speaker 1: of evidence out there about masks. It doesn't hurt me
Speaker 1: to wear one. I wear one. But with the schools,
Speaker 1: it's overwhelming evidence that they are not dangerous. There's overwhelming
Speaker 1: evidence that children are not in danger. There's overwhelming evidence
Speaker 1: that if you're in your thirties and forties, you're probably
Speaker 1: not in any danger either. You have to protect vulnerable people,
Speaker 1: and there are people who have immunos for a systems
Speaker 1: are older, and we should do that. But to shut
Speaker 1: all society down, I don't even understand why most Democrats
Speaker 1: are want that. I could understand it when they were
Speaker 1: trying to hurt Trump. And I'm not saying they make
Speaker 1: coronavirus up, it's a hoax. I'm just saying that they
Speaker 1: were much but they weaponized to try to shut down it.
Speaker 1: They weaponized it against Trump. But but now they're continuing
Speaker 1: with that weaponized mindset against the American people. Well that's
Speaker 1: what we're seeing, yeah, yeah, I mean that's what we're seeing.
Speaker 1: I mean, you know it's a CNN. You know, well,
Speaker 1: I just se Cup who we both know, right, we
Speaker 1: work all work together. I think for a short time,
Speaker 1: you know, today she's out there saying, oh, there's a
Speaker 1: correlation between states that don't have mask mandates and those
Speaker 1: who do. And then they take a snapshot in time
Speaker 1: of today and show you the spikes New York last week,
Speaker 1: the biggest spikes they were. And everyone's supposedly following all
Speaker 1: the rules they're except for hostidic Jews, right, So how
Speaker 1: is that possible California had a huge spike. When you
Speaker 1: look at europe plays like Belgium and Germany even and elsewhere,
Speaker 1: they are huge spikes where supposedly everyone's listening to the rules.
Speaker 1: It's clear to me that some small countries have been
Speaker 1: able to contain this. Norway maybe, or wherever. Single New Zealand, yeah,
Speaker 1: even they have trouble and they're an island. I can
Speaker 1: just shut down. We cannot do that. We just can't.
Speaker 1: And I think the economic cost and the cost to
Speaker 1: our children at this point for more lockdowns is it's
Speaker 1: just two aments. And uh, I'm with you, David. It
Speaker 1: was first Now it's just no one can have it
Speaker 1: and no one can die, and it's just not a
Speaker 1: way to run a country. Absolutely correct, David Arsani. Everybody
Speaker 1: read his latest at National Review dot com. Always a
Speaker 1: voice of reason. David, thanks so much, man. Good to
Speaker 1: talk to you again anytime. Thank you. You're in the
Speaker 1: Freedom Hunt. This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast. You
Speaker 1: know they haven't dropped all the Russia stuff still right.
Speaker 1: This is this is used as a continued smear of Trump,
Speaker 1: a way to get after him. Even to this day,
Speaker 1: they have not backed off of this. They have decided
Speaker 1: that this is just going to be something they continue
Speaker 1: on with it. And here's here's an example. Anything with Trump,
Speaker 1: they got to talk about about Putin and they've created
Speaker 1: this Russian boogeyman. I believe in Russia the boogeyman is
Speaker 1: called Baba Yaga, which I only know because of John Wick,
Speaker 1: which is a great action movie if you have not
Speaker 1: seen it, ridiculous but great. And here's Susan Rice play seventeen.
Speaker 1: But when you have the President United States daily constantly
Speaker 1: discrediting the election, pouring doubt on the results, false doubt,
Speaker 1: false doubt that not only misinforms a huge segment of
Speaker 1: our population and corrodes trust in our democracy and our
Speaker 1: institutions themselves, but makes us a laughing stock around the
Speaker 1: world and does great damage to the democratic model, which
Speaker 1: is why I'm quite sure that Vladimir Putin is doing
Speaker 1: a happy dance in Moscow as we speak. But this
Speaker 1: is extraordinarily irresponsible. Just break out the Putin comparison or
Speaker 1: the Putin name, whatever you need to, right, that's the usual,
Speaker 1: the usual. No sense that we get Susan Rice. She's
Speaker 1: going to come back in the A Biden administration. And
Speaker 1: I'll tell you this much, Senator Cotton knows what's up
Speaker 1: with her. Play fourteen play clip fourteen mark. Susan Rice
Speaker 1: was the typhoid Mary of the Obama administration foreign policy.
Speaker 1: She was at the middle of every terrible, flawed decision.
Speaker 1: Just take Libya for example. Many people remember Benghazi, but
Speaker 1: the very fact that we launched that war to begin with,
Speaker 1: without any plan for stability afterwards, to turn that country
Speaker 1: into an open civil war zone where they are still
Speaker 1: engaged in the slave trade, which allowed millions of migrants
Speaker 1: to cross the Mediterranean Sea if they survived the crossing
Speaker 1: and flood into Europe. That's an example of the kind
Speaker 1: of terrible judgment that Susan Rice displayed in the Obama administration.
Speaker 1: It's why a Democratic couldn't even confirm her in twenty
Speaker 1: twelve when Barack Obama wanted to make her a Secretary
Speaker 1: of State if a Democratic Senate couldn't confirm her, I
Speaker 1: doubt that a Republican Senate is going to confirm Susan Rice.
Speaker 1: We'll see about that. But Obama's foreign policy was terrible.
Speaker 1: Thanks for listening to the buses and show podcasts. Remember
Speaker 1: to subscribe on Apple podcasts, the iHeartRadio app, or wherever
Speaker 1: you get your podcasts. Here's one of the best moments
Speaker 1: from this week, as in as in the most entertaining.
Speaker 1: I mean it's it's a bad moment for believing that
Speaker 1: leadership in places like New York State is not completely incompetent,
Speaker 1: in an idiotic. But but here's one that I wanted
Speaker 1: to share with you, Governor Cuomo. Why do I do
Speaker 1: the accent like this? Why do I say that Cuomo
Speaker 1: sometimes sounds like this because sometimes his voice is more
Speaker 1: down here. Sometimes it's harder to understand what exactly my
Speaker 1: Cuomo impersonation comes from. But when he gets upset when
Speaker 1: Governor Cuomo is unhappy with someone, as he became at
Speaker 1: a press conference, you will hear that this is exact
Speaker 1: eactly how he sounds. Produce a mock play clip too, please,
Speaker 1: so what are you talking about? How? What are you
Speaker 1: talking about? You're now going to override. We get it already,
Speaker 1: that's the law. An orange zone in a red zone,
Speaker 1: follow the facts. Still confused, but then you're confused. I'm confusing.
Speaker 1: Parents are still confused as well the schools, and then
Speaker 1: I suffused. You're confused. I think you read the law.
Speaker 1: Confused as well? Read the law and you won't be confused. Well,
Speaker 1: it turns out that Cuomo was confused there because he
Speaker 1: was saying schools will be open, and then a couple
Speaker 1: of hours after that press conference that was yesterday, he
Speaker 1: had to say, or actually it came out from de
Speaker 1: Blasio that schools, in fact, we're closing. So who's the
Speaker 1: one who needs to read the law? You're confused, I'll
Speaker 1: not confused, You're confused, Cuomo says, you are the confused one,
Speaker 1: absolutely confused, very much so, very confused. So just remember
Speaker 1: that the people that are telling you what to do
Speaker 1: all the time, they are often imbeciles who have no
Speaker 1: idea what they're talking about. Don't feel like you need
Speaker 1: to show them deference, don't feel like you need to
Speaker 1: deal with them in a way that always treats their
Speaker 1: every pronouncement like it comes from a place of intelligence
Speaker 1: or good faith. Because there's a lot of a lot
Speaker 1: of idiots out there in unfortunately very powerful positions. Mayor
Speaker 1: de Blasio of New York City, he has put forward
Speaker 1: the school shutdown. Now, I he'll say that it's not
Speaker 1: his fault. There's a metric. Well, he just came up
Speaker 1: with some metric. It has to do with the general population,
Speaker 1: not the school population. And what's interesting about that is that, yeah,
Speaker 1: the general New York City population has a test positivity
Speaker 1: rate of close to three percent. Now, but that means
Speaker 1: that of a hundred people always leave this. Out of
Speaker 1: a hundred people that go get COVID tests right now
Speaker 1: in New York, only three actually have COVID right So well,
Speaker 1: that means there are a lot of people that think
Speaker 1: they have COVID or who are getting tests at least
Speaker 1: who don't. But the test positivity rate is not really
Speaker 1: an important indicator. What is an important indicator is hospitalizations
Speaker 1: and deaths. And when you look at schools, there's basically
Speaker 1: no hospitalizations and no deaths whatsoever of children, and very
Speaker 1: very few amongst school staff. So that's why when the
Speaker 1: Blasio says stuff like this, people like me want to
Speaker 1: freak out and yell at him Play nine. And as
Speaker 1: a result, we do need to close our schools for
Speaker 1: the coming days. No one is happy about this decision.
Speaker 1: We all, in fact, are feeling very sad about this
Speaker 1: decision because so much good work has been put into
Speaker 1: keeping the schools opened, to opening them up, to begin with,
Speaker 1: let's start there, opening the schools when almost no other
Speaker 1: major school system in America open, making them so safe.
Speaker 1: But we set a very clear standard and we need
Speaker 1: to stick to that standard. And I want to emphasize
Speaker 1: to parents, to educate us, the staff, to kids that
Speaker 1: we intend to come back and come back as quickly
Speaker 1: as possible. Yeah, we'll see about that. We'll see how
Speaker 1: long it takes, how much misery de Blasio is willing
Speaker 1: to put us all through. Because if we've seen, if
Speaker 1: we can take what's gone on to this point as
Speaker 1: some kind of an indicator, I mean, I think it
Speaker 1: is very clear that de Blasio and these other Democrat
Speaker 1: politicians Newsome in California, Garcetti, the mayor of Los Angeles,
Speaker 1: the mayor of Chicago, the governor of Michigan. You go
Speaker 1: down the list, all these different Democrats, and they are
Speaker 1: a polling appalling in their indifference to so much of
Speaker 1: the suffering that these lockdowns create. And they're never going
Speaker 1: to admit that they were wrong. They're never going to
Speaker 1: admit that they were bad policy, bad ideas. And the
Speaker 1: best way to make sure that no one can question
Speaker 1: them is to call for more lockdowns. Right, if we're
Speaker 1: always going through a series of lockdowns, how can we
Speaker 1: even know, How can we even know what we've what
Speaker 1: we've been able to accomplish or not in any given
Speaker 1: in any given moment, any given place in the country.
Speaker 1: But it's it's sad. It's sad to see that those
Speaker 1: who are in charge in this way are so indifferent
Speaker 1: and that the suffering that's going to happen as a
Speaker 1: result of parents that now have what are they going
Speaker 1: to do with their kids? What's the plan? How does
Speaker 1: this work? Right? But there is no plan. The plan
Speaker 1: is just shut down out of panic, make sure that
Speaker 1: they can't be accused of being the problem here. And
Speaker 1: I'm just going to keep saying it. This is not
Speaker 1: rooted in the science. And the Democrats are being really
Speaker 1: ruthless here. This somehow was about defeating Trump, and now
Speaker 1: they can't turn it off. Now they can't stop thinking
Speaker 1: of this as a way of attacking all of us right,
Speaker 1: of attacking our freedoms, of locking us all down. They're
Speaker 1: so convinced their right. And I really believe this, especially
Speaker 1: I come across this among Democrats. They simply do not
Speaker 1: They simply do not want to believe that they were wrong.
Speaker 1: They think they're too smart for that. They think that
Speaker 1: that that doesn't compute for them. I'm a smart person,
Speaker 1: so I believe in masks and social distancing mantra as
Speaker 1: the key to defeating this pandemic. Here, I am saying,
Speaker 1: we've been doing that for months. How long do we
Speaker 1: have to do this and not make any change that
Speaker 1: we can point to at all in the case load
Speaker 1: or the mortality or anything else before you recognize that
Speaker 1: as a policy, as a policy that does not work.
Speaker 1: This is what they don't understand. It's one thing to say,
Speaker 1: I keep bringing this up. If you wear a mask
Speaker 1: all the time, and social distance all the time. You might.
Speaker 1: That's not how human beings function, and the very people
Speaker 1: that are telling us to do that don't function that way.
Speaker 1: So why do we keep pretending that having those policies
Speaker 1: are going to work when we know that people won't
Speaker 1: do even what would be necessary by their own scientific
Speaker 1: you know, their own scientific assessment for all of us
Speaker 1: to do. Right, If if you're around somebody and they're
Speaker 1: breathing out virus and you pull that mask down for
Speaker 1: one second, you might have been infected, right, You don't know.
Speaker 1: Depends on how much viral load is in the air,
Speaker 1: and we have no real way of measuring these things.
Speaker 1: But all I can tell you is that you look
Speaker 1: at states that have man to look at states that don't,
Speaker 1: and there's nothing you can point to that shows that
Speaker 1: mandates really work and help. And we know that the
Speaker 1: thing with amenity is it's guaranteed, it's guaranteed that it's
Speaker 1: going to be painful and economically disastrous. That you definitely
Speaker 1: get and you're going to see a tremendous amount, especially
Speaker 1: going into this winter, of the blame game being played
Speaker 1: here over who's responsible for all this pain and suffering?
Speaker 1: Play clip aid. Here's Bernie Sanders on that. I think
Speaker 1: if we come out strong from day one, standing up
Speaker 1: and making it clear that we have proposals to benefit
Speaker 1: working families, and if we are prepared to go into
Speaker 1: those sites to tell those Republican senators, you're not going
Speaker 1: to vote for a strong COVID nineteen package which protects workers.
Speaker 1: Guess what we're heading into your state. We're going to
Speaker 1: explain it to the people in your state. Now, we
Speaker 1: don't know what the results in Georgia will be, but
Speaker 1: it is going to be a very very tight center.
Speaker 1: And I think we can put pressure on individual Republicans
Speaker 1: to do the right thing by talking to the constituents
Speaker 1: in their own state. When we have clear proposals raising
Speaker 1: the minimum wage, expanding healthcare, making public colleges and universities
Speaker 1: tuition free, you make that clear, I think the people
Speaker 1: in those states will put pressure on their Republican senators.
Speaker 1: We had a one point six trillion dollars student loan debt,
Speaker 1: and Bernie Sanders answer is to just essentially nationalize all
Speaker 1: college and university payment, make it all, make it all free.
Speaker 1: I mean, wow, what a giveaway, right? I mean thing?
Speaker 1: Think of how the teachers unions are such an essential
Speaker 1: engine of Democrat party power. And now I imagine you
Speaker 1: have colleges and universities, and now I'm talking about state
Speaker 1: college and community college and universities, but imagine that everyone
Speaker 1: just goes tuition free. It's all paid by the government.
Speaker 1: Those places are going to be even more communist enclaves
Speaker 1: than they currently are. It's going to be outrageous. But
Speaker 1: remember Bernie Sanders out there saying that they want to
Speaker 1: help people. He's out there making this case. And on
Speaker 1: the other side of it, you've got Nancy Pelosi, who
Speaker 1: slowed down aid to cities, who didn't want to do
Speaker 1: what was necessary to help the cities because she wasn't
Speaker 1: getting everything that she wanted. So they're completely willing to
Speaker 1: watch people suffered during this pandemic that they have no
Speaker 1: problem with the continued suffering that's going on because they're
Speaker 1: intransigence on some of these issues, and now they want
Speaker 1: to act like they care so much and they want
Speaker 1: to help you. It's just absurd. Mitch McConnell points this out. Cocaine, Mitch,
Speaker 1: let's hear from in place sixteen. Republicans have spent much
Speaker 1: much trying to get another bipartisan rescue package passed and
Speaker 1: signed in the law for the American people. For much
Speaker 1: our position has been entirely consistent. We want to reach
Speaker 1: agreement on all the areas were compromised. Is well within reach,
Speaker 1: send hundreds of billions of dollars to urgent and uncontroversial programs,
Speaker 1: and let Washington argue over the rest later. There's no
Speaker 1: reason by doing right by struggling families should wait until
Speaker 1: we resolve every difference on every issue. But unfortunately, both
Speaker 1: Speaker Pelosi and the Democratic Leader have been equally consistent,
Speaker 1: and they don't think Congress should do anything at all,
Speaker 1: anything unless they get to cash out a far left
Speaker 1: ideological wish list, including things with zero relationship to the
Speaker 1: present crisis. That is what's going on. It's give Pelosi
Speaker 1: exactly what she wants or nothing, and it's nothing for
Speaker 1: the people. It's nothing for pelosi constituents, but shouted and
Speaker 1: Nazi doesn't care. She's got millions had, she's powerful, had
Speaker 1: she just plans to keep doing exactly what she's doing
Speaker 1: right now because she's a master legislator. She's really concerned
Speaker 1: about one thing and one thing only. As I always
Speaker 1: tell you speaker, Pelosi is concerned with her own power.
Speaker 1: Play thirteen. There's the statements that I made, and we
Speaker 1: are listen. If my husband is listening, don't let me
Speaker 1: have to be more specific than that, because we never
Speaker 1: expected to have another term. Now, I consider this a gift,
Speaker 1: and I can't wait to be working with Joe Biden
Speaker 1: and preparing us for our transition into the future. So
Speaker 1: I don't want to undermine any leverage I may have.
Speaker 1: But I made the statement. It's all about what Pelosi
Speaker 1: is going to get out of this. It's all about
Speaker 1: Pelosi benefiting what she pretends it's about the people. That's
Speaker 1: the funny part. She pretends it's about helping all of
Speaker 1: the rest never true then, never true now, But Nancy
Speaker 1: gets away with it somehow. I'm there's a part of
Speaker 1: me that's fascinated by her. Such an unimpressive person who's
Speaker 1: managed to just cling so ruthlessly but effectively to power
Speaker 1: for so long. You're in the freedom Mine. This is
Speaker 1: the Buck Sexton Show podcast. Recent reports that Donald Trump
Speaker 1: was actively considering a major military strike against Irani and
Speaker 1: targets really is quite disturbing because what we don't want
Speaker 1: to do is to trigger some type of conflict right
Speaker 1: now during this transition period when Joe Biden has to
Speaker 1: pick up the pieces on January twentieth. So Mike Pompeo
Speaker 1: has demonstrated time and again that he's willing to do
Speaker 1: Donald Trump's bidding irrespective of what the implications are for
Speaker 1: US national security interests. And so I'm hoping that there's
Speaker 1: going to be no activity that really is going to
Speaker 1: make it more difficult for US to try to repair
Speaker 1: the damage that has been done over the last four
Speaker 1: years in terms of Donald Trump's actions on Middle East policies.
Speaker 1: It really needs to be addressed very carefully. And that's
Speaker 1: why I think it is outrageous Joe Biden and his
Speaker 1: team have not been allowed to have insight into what
Speaker 1: is currently underway in the Middle East and around the world.
Speaker 1: This transition period is so critically important to ensure that
Speaker 1: US national security interests are going to be protected, so
Speaker 1: much to talk about here. That was former CI director
Speaker 1: and close Obama advisor Guy Brennan, one of the chiefs
Speaker 1: of the Russia collusion hoax, and here he is lecturing
Speaker 1: people about Trump and the transition to Biden, when Biden
Speaker 1: has not the votes in the States have not been certified,
Speaker 1: the electrical College votes have not been cast. What we
Speaker 1: do not know. And yet he's claiming that there's a
Speaker 1: horrible crime being done here because there's not more movement
Speaker 1: in this in the transition. That's not even clear what's happening.
Speaker 1: This is a guy who was part of sabotaging, actively
Speaker 1: sabotaging the coming Trump administration in twenty sixteen, based on lies,
Speaker 1: based on total chicanery, just utter bull And you know
Speaker 1: here he is lecturing people. He's just lecturing people on
Speaker 1: this one. It's it's just disgusting. But also beyond that,
Speaker 1: to talk about Obama's part to have been part of
Speaker 1: Obama's Middi's policy and the foreign policy Obama administration and
Speaker 1: act like you're in a position to lecture anyone about
Speaker 1: anything is mind blowing. I really mean that, it is
Speaker 1: completely mind blowing. The Obama administration's foreign policy was a disaster,
Speaker 1: no achievements. To point to nothing that went well, Everything
Speaker 1: went badly, And you see it for yourself. Just look
Speaker 1: look at a place, look at it, look at an
Speaker 1: important Yeah, I don't know, maybe maybe our relationship with
Speaker 1: you know, Moldova and improved though I doubt it right,
Speaker 1: but I you know, maybe we find some country somewhere
Speaker 1: in all the hot spots. China get got to just
Speaker 1: run over us and do whatever they wanted, no real pushback.
Speaker 1: Iraq was a disaster, Syria disaster, Libya disaster. I mean,
Speaker 1: go down the list, the rise of ISIS. And now
Speaker 1: you have this very troubling trend, and it's coming from
Speaker 1: a lot of Republicans to Trump wants to draw down
Speaker 1: even more in Afghanistan, and you have all these Republicans
Speaker 1: are saying, no, no, we can't do that. We have
Speaker 1: a such a strategic interest in Afghanistan. What's the strategic
Speaker 1: interest in Afghanistan? What We're gonna just stay there forever
Speaker 1: to make sure the Taliman never takes over? That is
Speaker 1: that our strategic So so we've permanently partially colonized Afghanistan?
Speaker 1: Is that the plan? What are we really doing there? Oh,
Speaker 1: we're stopping it from becoming a terrorist safe haven. Look,
Speaker 1: I used to believe this rhetoric too. I used to
Speaker 1: think that, yeah, yeah, we got to do that. But
Speaker 1: I mean, if they come at us, if there's another
Speaker 1: nine to eleven like plot that happens from somewhere in Afghanistan.
Speaker 1: You know, we'll go there, We'll lay waste the whole
Speaker 1: thing again. I mean, you know, we can't live our
Speaker 1: life in constant fear of a strike that happened twenty
Speaker 1: years ago that could be plotted from any number of
Speaker 1: places that aren't Afghanistan. So you know, I just think
Speaker 1: that the stories you're seeing about the permanent national security
Speaker 1: bureaucracy essentially standing athwart Trump's efforts to pull out of
Speaker 1: these countries, I just want to say, who the heck
Speaker 1: do they think they are? What makes them think that
Speaker 1: it's legitimate for them to try to thwart the will
Speaker 1: of the duly elected president of the United States in
Speaker 1: this way. I mean, it's appalling the fact that they
Speaker 1: believe that they should be the ones stopping the president
Speaker 1: from doing a draw down of troops in Afghanistan. Where
Speaker 1: do they get that authority? I mean, the forever war
Speaker 1: mentality is one thing that I hope we carry on
Speaker 1: into the next administration and the one after that, And
Speaker 1: I mean the anti forever war mentality, right, the fact
Speaker 1: that we've learned how terrible forever war is. I hope
Speaker 1: we carry that lesson on that we continue to understand
Speaker 1: what a disaster that is. And Trump has not started wars.
Speaker 1: God bless him for it. Thanks for listening to the
Speaker 1: Buses show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on Apple podcast the
Speaker 1: iHeartRadio app for Warrever you get your podcasts. Hey, Team Buck,
Speaker 1: it's time for roll call, telling you man that dubstep
Speaker 1: music is gonna make a comeback one day. It's gonna
Speaker 1: make a comeback one day. All right, here we go,
Speaker 1: Facebook dot com, slash bucks in Team Buck at iHeartMedia
Speaker 1: dot com. You can also send us messages on Instagram
Speaker 1: to send us a direct message to Buck Sexton and yeah,
Speaker 1: we got things going, folks. We've got things happen. And
Speaker 1: make sure you also subscribe to our YouTube channel, YouTube
Speaker 1: dot com slash buck Sex and we're posting original content
Speaker 1: now to YouTube every weekday. So it's kind of a
Speaker 1: buck rant, that's what we're doing there. Let's get to it, Henry.
Speaker 1: Hey Buck, In regards to your idea of choosing and
Speaker 1: flipping one city to turn it red, I love it.
Speaker 1: For far too long, the left has been ravaging our
Speaker 1: states like locusts. I think it's time to put them
Speaker 1: on the defensive and put them in the mentality of
Speaker 1: I gotta leave this red state for somewhere more liberal.
Speaker 1: Like many of us say about living in a blue state,
Speaker 1: I'd like to nominate the name Operation Red Storm and
Speaker 1: nominate my beautiful city of Greensboro in the besieged state
Speaker 1: of North Carolina. This can be a great staging area
Speaker 1: to eventually overrun Raleigh. Love your show, shield tie, That
Speaker 1: sounds great, I mean Greensboro. Yeah, we may make Greensboro
Speaker 1: that red stronghold, that urban red stronghold in North Carolina.
Speaker 1: That sounds like a lot of fun to me. I
Speaker 1: think Greensboro is actually pretty pretty liberal from what I
Speaker 1: understand right now. And yeah, then eventually to take over Raleigh,
Speaker 1: that would be great. Where this is what we need
Speaker 1: to do. We need to consolidate. We need to have
Speaker 1: enough conservatives in a We need a conservative city. If
Speaker 1: one existed, a lot of other people would want to
Speaker 1: live in it, right, A lot of people would go there.
Speaker 1: But we've just, for so many of a lot of
Speaker 1: complicated reasons all pulled together, we just don't have one.
Speaker 1: There's no such thing, no such thing as a large
Speaker 1: red Republican city in America. They're all blue. They're all
Speaker 1: you know, find me the state. They're all blue. Even
Speaker 1: when I was in Montana over the summer, they were
Speaker 1: they were complaining about about how Bozeman was liberal. I mean,
Speaker 1: I'm like, Bozeman is liberal. Oh yeah, Bozeman. Bunch of
Speaker 1: Libs in Bozeman come from California. I'm sitting here. You
Speaker 1: gotta be kidding me. Even in Montana. Uh, it's crazy.
Speaker 1: It's crazy talk. Bruce and Mark, what's the what's the
Speaker 1: most republican part of New Jersey? Do we know? Is
Speaker 1: there other rural parts of New Jersey that are very red? Oh? Yeah,
Speaker 1: there are very rural parts. I don't know off the
Speaker 1: top of my head the exact towns, but I think
Speaker 1: believe there's parts of North Jersey and South Jersey just
Speaker 1: all over the kind of spread. Yeah, Like they're parts
Speaker 1: of New Jersey where people go hunt deer and stuff
Speaker 1: like that, right, I mean, once you get closer to
Speaker 1: Pennsylvania and upstate New York, yeah, that's where it is. Yeah,
Speaker 1: because always my New Jersey for me is across the river,
Speaker 1: and it feels like an extension of New York. But
Speaker 1: I know that there's far, far beyond that, the Great
Speaker 1: State of n J, where I think I told you recently,
Speaker 1: there's like very high happiness index for people in New Jersey.
Speaker 1: When they do these state happiness assessments, people in New
Speaker 1: Jersey a probably very happy. I'm just happy to be
Speaker 1: off of Long Island cesspool that places. Why why why
Speaker 1: New Jersey better than Long Island for you? Well? Number one,
Speaker 1: the taxes. I mean, NASA Suffolk County have the highest
Speaker 1: taxes in the country, so I definitely am never planning
Speaker 1: on living there again. That's the number one reason. Oh
Speaker 1: all right, Chris, next up here, Buck, I've seen you
Speaker 1: on TV here and there throughout the years. Finally call
Speaker 1: your podcast many many months ago. Haven't missed an episode
Speaker 1: since it's an intelligent, zero tolerance for ignorant show, and
Speaker 1: though it deals with a lot of serious subject matter
Speaker 1: in the world, so highlight of the day to click
Speaker 1: on your show while cooking dinner for the family. I
Speaker 1: don't call into radio shows to reach out like this,
Speaker 1: but I want to say thanks, love the show, and
Speaker 1: now I feel like I can make a proper claim
Speaker 1: to join the many and say shield side. Chris, thanks
Speaker 1: so much for writing and we love getting first timers
Speaker 1: writing in and really appreciate your support of the show.
Speaker 1: It means a lot, and that's a great way to
Speaker 1: do it too. Listen during when you're making dinner or
Speaker 1: you're getting ready for things, you know, at night after
Speaker 1: long day of work. The show will catch you up
Speaker 1: and everything you need to know. And we really appreciate them,
Speaker 1: and thank you for being a part of the team.
Speaker 1: And please, if you don't mind, spread the word, tell
Speaker 1: some friends of yours. Hey, you gotta try this skuybuck
Speaker 1: sex and listen to a show. Bob panic insanity buying
Speaker 1: of toilet paper, paper, towels, cleanex is underway in southwest Indiana.
Speaker 1: At Target this afternoon, shelves were completely empty. In fact,
Speaker 1: Target was using the shelves to store air fryers that
Speaker 1: are on sale. The insanity is even greater than in
Speaker 1: February and March. How soon can we blame Biden Harris? Oh,
Speaker 1: that's right, this is Trump's fault, according to the media
Speaker 1: and the Libs. Yeah, Bob, it's happening in my neighborhood too.
Speaker 1: I'm already starting to see. You know, you get The
Speaker 1: first sign is that you only get that TP You know,
Speaker 1: you only get that toilet paper that's kind of off brand,
Speaker 1: and you're like, that's going to be a little rough
Speaker 1: on my tushie. You know, the bad toilet paper you
Speaker 1: know what I'm talking about? Mark, Yeah, one play. Yeah,
Speaker 1: there's like the eh exactly Like everybody wants that nice, luxurious, capitalist,
Speaker 1: first world TP. You know what I mean. You want
Speaker 1: that stuff? You not want the bootleg TPE. It is
Speaker 1: not good. And I go to the store now and
Speaker 1: that's all that I see, and that that is that
Speaker 1: is rough and I don't want to have to like
Speaker 1: use you know, what do they use for babies or whatever?
Speaker 1: You don't tell as no, well they yeah that, but
Speaker 1: is it a dess it in? You know, because if
Speaker 1: things get if there's a little bit of roughness, you know,
Speaker 1: you don't want that. You want the soft TP. Just
Speaker 1: get a biday. That seems like a lot. I don't
Speaker 1: have the room and my bathroom. I live in an
Speaker 1: apartment of New York City. My bathroom is tiny. Uh
Speaker 1: the bid Day toilets, did they really? Yeah? Yeah, I
Speaker 1: mean I'll just tell you this. There's there's the panic
Speaker 1: buying already starting to happen. And what I find amazing
Speaker 1: is people they want to stock up on on like
Speaker 1: dried pasta, And I just want to say, if it
Speaker 1: comes down to that last that last box of you know,
Speaker 1: baked ZD or whatever, or of ZD is what keeps
Speaker 1: you going, you know, it keeps you from starving. Society
Speaker 1: has got such bigger problems that I don't think it's
Speaker 1: gonna matter that you've got one more boxes ZD. I'm
Speaker 1: just gonna say it. I think we got bigger issues.
Speaker 1: So I wish people wouldn't do the panic behind that's
Speaker 1: what it's already happening. Paper towel is gonna be very
Speaker 1: hard to come by, Lysol wipes even though friends, it's aerosolized.
Speaker 1: It's not about surfaces. We've learned this. Everyone needs to
Speaker 1: pay attention to this now, you know. That's that's where
Speaker 1: we are. But you know, the lips don't want People
Speaker 1: don't want to listen. People don't want to listen. They
Speaker 1: want to think that what they've been doing in the
Speaker 1: past is smart, it's right, such as life all right, Brian,
Speaker 1: I heard you say that liberals blame us for the
Speaker 1: mask and lockdowns being ineffective by saying we're just not
Speaker 1: doing it right. Isn't that just the same excuse they
Speaker 1: used to explain why socialism has always failed. Yeah, Brian,
Speaker 1: That's what I've been saying. That is my argument that
Speaker 1: every time a lockdown or a mask mandate fails, every
Speaker 1: time that happens, the response is we didn't do it enough.
Speaker 1: And you see a similar mentality when it comes to
Speaker 1: socialism and communism. What happens is that it doesn't work.
Speaker 1: We know it's not going to work, and then they
Speaker 1: turn around and they say, well, you didn't do it
Speaker 1: the right way. That's the problem. It's you. It's not
Speaker 1: that our ideas are wrong, it's that you didn't do
Speaker 1: the idea of the way it was supposed to be done.
Speaker 1: A very easy way to evade accountability, and certainly for
Speaker 1: socialists that's a highly appealing, a highly appealing situation. They
Speaker 1: want to avoid accountability. TJ. Buck and the Republicans put
Speaker 1: up a nominee for the next House Speaker against the
Speaker 1: Democrat nominee. Pelosi also correct me if I'm wrong, but
Speaker 1: the speaker does not have to be a member of
Speaker 1: the House. Therefore, would not it would would it be
Speaker 1: unreasonable Republicans to nominate an agreeable moderate Democrat who does
Speaker 1: not belong to the House and who may be able
Speaker 1: to pull away a few Democrat votes come January. I'm
Speaker 1: thinking someone along the lines of a certain former congresswoman
Speaker 1: from the Aloha State. What do you say, I mean,
Speaker 1: TJ It's a nice idea, but it's not gonna happen.
Speaker 1: Nancy Pelosi rules that Democrat roost with an iron grip.
Speaker 1: She's not messing around, and they're gonna She's gonna get
Speaker 1: her way. And Republicans have no they got we got
Speaker 1: nothing to trade, we got nothing to offer for putting
Speaker 1: forward a nominee that's different than what the Democrat caucus
Speaker 1: would want or the Democrat bass would want. So that's
Speaker 1: where we are. A nice idea, interesting thinking outside the box.
Speaker 1: And yeah, it'd be nice to have Tulsi Gabbert, but
Speaker 1: remember Tulci Gabbert's a huge liberal, guys. I mean, she's
Speaker 1: just not a a hateful, spiteful liberal with no redeeming qualities,
Speaker 1: but she's a big liberal. That's real. Pablo hey Buck,
Speaker 1: I was remembering all the Anne to the left pold
Speaker 1: in twenty sixteen until Inauguration Day in twenty seventeen. The
Speaker 1: left started with Obama holding a press conference dating it
Speaker 1: was the Russians. Then the campaign to change the Electoral
Speaker 1: College's votes. As if that wasn't enough, crazy House members
Speaker 1: began begging the Senate not to certify the electoral College vote.
Speaker 1: This was daily and accepted by all the left wing outlets.
Speaker 1: Now it's Unamerican to legally challenge the tallies in the courts.
Speaker 1: Hypocrites shields high. Now, Babo, you're right. I remember there
Speaker 1: was the whole push among Democrats for faithless electors that
Speaker 1: the Democrats were trying to get. This is in twenty sixteen.
Speaker 1: They were trying to get people in the Electoral College
Speaker 1: who were, you know, were bound by their word to
Speaker 1: support a certain candidate. They were trying to get them
Speaker 1: to just switch, you know, which which technically could happen,
Speaker 1: but can you imagine imagine what that would have resulted in. So, yes,
Speaker 1: the Democrats tried everything, every dirty trick they could come
Speaker 1: up with. There was nothing that they were unwilling to
Speaker 1: do in this process of trying to stop Trump in
Speaker 1: twenty sixteen. I mean, they did everything they could think of.
Speaker 1: So I agree with you that it's it's very hypocritical
Speaker 1: for them now to torunt and say, why aren't you
Speaker 1: respecting our democracy, because we all know that it's not
Speaker 1: about democracy for them. We all know that it's not
Speaker 1: about respecting the system. They just they want what they want.
Speaker 1: That's it. I want to get. They want to get
Speaker 1: the result that is desired. Everything else, everything else is noise.
Speaker 1: Matt Rights, Buck, Marx, and Engles envisioned that the care
Speaker 1: and education of the children becomes a public affair. Society
Speaker 1: looks after all children alike, whether they're legitimate or not.
Speaker 1: My question to you is, does this mean that public
Speaker 1: education daycare at Teter is inherently Marxist? Keep up the
Speaker 1: fantastic work. YouTube producer Markshield's high. Yes, I mean social
Speaker 1: public schools are socialism. So yes, that that is true,
Speaker 1: and I don't think they have to inherently be Marxist
Speaker 1: indoctrination centers. But the concepts, the concept of public school
Speaker 1: is is socialist. And I think it's interesting that we're
Speaker 1: in a wealthier and wealthier society with more and more
Speaker 1: free access to information, and yet we rely on the
Speaker 1: state to provide education for children much more so than
Speaker 1: we should have to. You're in the freedom hunt. This
Speaker 1: is the Buck Sex and Show podcast. The role Call
Speaker 1: continue with with Wendy hopefully not off gallivanting with Peter
Speaker 1: Pan and Tinkerbell Buck and Mark. I have not ever
Speaker 1: responded to a talk show host before, but after listening
Speaker 1: to the two of you talking about favorite Thanksgiving side
Speaker 1: dishes last week, I was compelled to offer up a
Speaker 1: new option for you. It broke my heart and I
Speaker 1: found it really hard to believe that both of you
Speaker 1: have gone through your entire life and not had the
Speaker 1: opportunity of experiencing a green bean casserole at Thanksgiving or Christmas.
Speaker 1: I can't help but wonder if that's a regional preference
Speaker 1: or not. But I grew up in the Midwest where
Speaker 1: it was standard. Well, Wendy, we appreciate your thoughtfulness about us.
Speaker 1: I just know that green beans are the thing that
Speaker 1: usually put on a kid's plate so that there's something
Speaker 1: green and they're eating healthy. I don't think anyone ever goes,
Speaker 1: m give me those green beans. But maybe if the
Speaker 1: casserole has like cheese and breading and stuff, is that
Speaker 1: I mean, what's in a green bean casserole? Producer, Mark,
Speaker 1: I have to imagine there's cheese and breading and whatnot
Speaker 1: in it. Why else would people eat it. Let's see it.
Speaker 1: I'm looking at a picture of it. It It looks like
Speaker 1: there's some sort of oh, green beans, cream of mushroom soup,
Speaker 1: and French fried onions to actually sounds like it's probably
Speaker 1: pretty good. Yeah, I don't mind the green bean. It's
Speaker 1: just not the thing that I'm looking forward to it
Speaker 1: Thanksgiving dinner. I mean cream of mushroom soup. I used
Speaker 1: to drink that all the time as a kid. I
Speaker 1: loved it. I thought cream and mushroom soup was amazing.
Speaker 1: So like instead of like fruit punch, sho'd have cream
Speaker 1: of mushroom soup. No, I wouldn't drink it like that,
Speaker 1: but I say, yeah, that's gross. I did think that.
Speaker 1: I think that kool Aid fruit punch kool Aid I
Speaker 1: went through a phase, right, I thought that was amazing.
Speaker 1: I also drank a lot of you Who until I
Speaker 1: figured out one day that it's not even chocolate milk,
Speaker 1: it's chocolate drink. Well, yeah, how do you think it's
Speaker 1: just sitting there on shelves. Yeah. I used to drink
Speaker 1: a lot of Nestley Quick, which was not calorically a
Speaker 1: good decision, but it was delicious. I will say that
Speaker 1: I loved I loved that. So yeah, Wendy, maybe maybe
Speaker 1: this year Thanksgiving I'll try my first green being casserole.
Speaker 1: Sounds like it's probably quite yummy. I mean, anything with
Speaker 1: cream and mushroom soup. I was kind of just thinking
Speaker 1: of like a big green bean side dish, and green
Speaker 1: beans are fine. I'm a cooked green vegetables fan in general.
Speaker 1: I like Brussels sprouts. I even like kale. I love spinach.
Speaker 1: You know, I'm into a broccoli. I'm into all that stuff.
Speaker 1: Green beans, you know me, I like them a little
Speaker 1: bit of sliced almond, you know, kind of the French style.
Speaker 1: You know, what is a green bean almond dean or
Speaker 1: something that's that stuff is good. I know, personally I
Speaker 1: only eat the vegetables, and Thanksgiving sort I get judged
Speaker 1: for not eating vegetables. Yeah, I'm not there for the vegetables. No, no,
Speaker 1: no one's there for the vegetables though, But what is
Speaker 1: your what is your healthy vegetable of choice to balance
Speaker 1: out the like plate of barbecue ribs, You're gonna have colieflower.
Speaker 1: It is always the most versatile collie flower. Very interesting.
Speaker 1: All right, I'll take it next up here speaking of food, Wilson,
Speaker 1: oreos are actually a rip off of a hydrocks. The
Speaker 1: hydrocks came first. I know all about it because they're
Speaker 1: my dad's favorite cookie. He has maintained a disc like
Speaker 1: for oreos. Whoever, hid rocks are now back. They are
Speaker 1: not in stores, but you can order them online, get
Speaker 1: some and enjoy. I was unaware of that. I thought
Speaker 1: that hydrocks was like the cheapo ripoff of oreos. Apparently
Speaker 1: oreos are the better improved version of hydrocks. Who knew
Speaker 1: there are cheaper ripoffs of oreos. Yeah, of course, cheaper
Speaker 1: ripoffs of all kinds of cookies. So yeah, that's that's right.
Speaker 1: I missed the days when I used to be able
Speaker 1: to eat my cereal Guilty Pleasure with cinnamon toast crunch
Speaker 1: for the longest time. Oh, cinnamon toast crunch is good.
Speaker 1: I would imagine there's not much gluten free cereal in
Speaker 1: the regular aisle now if it's rice based, but not
Speaker 1: even rice Krispy treats. Standard rice Krispy treats are gluten
Speaker 1: free because they use a malted barley sweetener which has
Speaker 1: gluten in it, to sweeten them up a little bit.
Speaker 1: Which is a shame. Um, I think is it kicks?
Speaker 1: I think are made with corn. Maybe there's a couple
Speaker 1: of I don't know. No one who has gluten problems.
Speaker 1: Listen to me on this. I forget. I don't really
Speaker 1: eat cereal. They make gluten free granola and all that stuff,
Speaker 1: But if you're looking for a really good gluten free cereal,
Speaker 1: there's not many of them. I think there is gluten.
Speaker 1: There are gluten free cheerios that you can get, but
Speaker 1: there's not a lot. There's not a lot. Next up
Speaker 1: here time. Oh wait, no, we gotta leave it there
Speaker 1: for today. Oh my gosh, show just flew by. Everybody
Speaker 1: passed the buck. Tell somebody about the show this week,
Speaker 1: Share it with them. It's on the iHeart app, Spotify,
Speaker 1: you name it. Until next time. Shields High