WEBVTT - OpenAI Tops $850 Billion Valuation

0:00:00.280 --> 0:00:13.760
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. Bloomberg Tech is alive

0:00:13.800 --> 0:00:17.599
<v Speaker 1>from coast to coast with Caroline Hide in New York

0:00:17.880 --> 0:00:20.960
<v Speaker 1>and Ed Lovelow in San Francisco.

0:00:22.680 --> 0:00:25.880
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Tech. I'm Tim Senovek in New York.

0:00:26.120 --> 0:00:29.280
<v Speaker 2>Coming up, Open AI closes one of the biggest funding

0:00:29.360 --> 0:00:33.159
<v Speaker 2>rounds in history. We're gonna have the details. Plus, Anthropic

0:00:33.360 --> 0:00:37.240
<v Speaker 2>accidentally releases internal source code behind its claud coding assistant.

0:00:37.760 --> 0:00:40.800
<v Speaker 2>And today is launch day for Artemis two. We are

0:00:40.840 --> 0:00:43.479
<v Speaker 2>on the ground at Kennedy Space Center. We're going to

0:00:43.560 --> 0:00:45.959
<v Speaker 2>get you the latest. First though, a.

0:00:46.000 --> 0:00:47.600
<v Speaker 3>Check on the markets.

0:00:47.960 --> 0:00:51.639
<v Speaker 2>Tech stocks in the green along with other US stocks.

0:00:51.720 --> 0:00:54.440
<v Speaker 2>This as optimism grows that the war in the Middle

0:00:54.440 --> 0:00:57.440
<v Speaker 2>East may be nearing a conclusion. Look at what we

0:00:57.720 --> 0:00:59.960
<v Speaker 2>see right here on the big board. The NAZAC wondered

0:01:00.120 --> 0:01:03.560
<v Speaker 2>off to a pretty strong start for the quarter, but

0:01:03.640 --> 0:01:07.120
<v Speaker 2>this does come after a relatively bad quarter where it

0:01:07.160 --> 0:01:10.600
<v Speaker 2>fell six percent out of correction territory though we should

0:01:10.640 --> 0:01:12.839
<v Speaker 2>note also the S and B five hundred up nine

0:01:12.840 --> 0:01:15.200
<v Speaker 2>tens of one percent, following a decline in the most

0:01:15.200 --> 0:01:19.080
<v Speaker 2>recent quarter of four point six percent. Oil still above

0:01:19.120 --> 0:01:21.240
<v Speaker 2>one hundred dollars a barrel. This is Brent crude up

0:01:21.720 --> 0:01:24.320
<v Speaker 2>one and one sixty six is where we are down

0:01:24.360 --> 0:01:28.000
<v Speaker 2>two percent. To talk about a tough quarter for Brent

0:01:28.080 --> 0:01:32.760
<v Speaker 2>crude up a whopping seventy percent. We've got a great

0:01:32.760 --> 0:01:35.920
<v Speaker 2>program coming up. Investors are a little nervous when it

0:01:35.959 --> 0:01:39.040
<v Speaker 2>comes to stocks, but still higher on this first day

0:01:39.080 --> 0:01:40.640
<v Speaker 2>in the quarter. I do want to start in Washington,

0:01:40.680 --> 0:01:43.600
<v Speaker 2>where President Trump has arrived at the Supreme Court for

0:01:43.760 --> 0:01:47.960
<v Speaker 2>oral arguments in the birthright citizenship case. Bloomberg Washington correspondent

0:01:48.160 --> 0:01:51.880
<v Speaker 2>Tyler Kendall joins us with the latest. Tyler, an unprecedented

0:01:51.920 --> 0:01:56.120
<v Speaker 2>move for a sitting president to attend these arguments at

0:01:56.120 --> 0:01:57.480
<v Speaker 2>the Supreme Court. What can you tell us.

0:02:00.040 --> 0:02:00.600
<v Speaker 4>The ATM.

0:02:00.640 --> 0:02:03.120
<v Speaker 5>So, we're about an hour into the oral arguments here

0:02:03.160 --> 0:02:05.800
<v Speaker 5>at the Supreme Courts. Right now, the US Solicitor General

0:02:05.920 --> 0:02:09.280
<v Speaker 5>John Sower is still being questioned by the justices. We

0:02:09.360 --> 0:02:11.480
<v Speaker 5>have to keep in mind this case centers on President

0:02:11.520 --> 0:02:14.359
<v Speaker 5>Trump's executive order that he signed on the first day

0:02:14.360 --> 0:02:17.799
<v Speaker 5>in office, seeking to bar US born children of undocumented

0:02:17.800 --> 0:02:21.799
<v Speaker 5>immigrants from obtaining US citizenship. And what the justices are

0:02:21.840 --> 0:02:24.920
<v Speaker 5>looking at today is the Trump administration's interpretation of the

0:02:24.960 --> 0:02:28.320
<v Speaker 5>citizenship clause under the fourteenth Amendment. We're not going to

0:02:28.320 --> 0:02:31.160
<v Speaker 5>get to walky into it here, but the Trump administration,

0:02:31.240 --> 0:02:34.240
<v Speaker 5>as we're hearing outlined right now by the US Solicitor General,

0:02:34.320 --> 0:02:37.680
<v Speaker 5>is essentially arguing that in order for the Amendment to apply,

0:02:37.800 --> 0:02:40.840
<v Speaker 5>it requires a relationship of what he is calling full

0:02:40.919 --> 0:02:44.200
<v Speaker 5>allegiance to the United States, which the Trump administration says

0:02:44.240 --> 0:02:47.680
<v Speaker 5>does not extend to undocumented immigrants or temporary visitors. We

0:02:47.760 --> 0:02:50.320
<v Speaker 5>are about to hear from the challengers in this case.

0:02:50.360 --> 0:02:53.240
<v Speaker 5>The ACLU lawyer is about to be questioned by the

0:02:53.280 --> 0:02:56.720
<v Speaker 5>Supreme Court justices who argues that the Fourteenth Amendment has

0:02:56.760 --> 0:03:01.120
<v Speaker 5>a long standing legal precedent of granting's citizenship to those

0:03:01.200 --> 0:03:04.000
<v Speaker 5>born on US soil. Now, Tim, we're not expecting to

0:03:04.040 --> 0:03:06.720
<v Speaker 5>get a ruling today from the justices, but rather we're

0:03:06.720 --> 0:03:09.480
<v Speaker 5>looking for those signals on how they may rule. We

0:03:09.520 --> 0:03:12.520
<v Speaker 5>had some indications going into this that some conservative justices

0:03:12.560 --> 0:03:16.040
<v Speaker 5>may be skeptical, and that appears to be echoed in

0:03:16.160 --> 0:03:18.760
<v Speaker 5>what we have heard so far. That includes Chief Justice

0:03:18.840 --> 0:03:22.600
<v Speaker 5>John Roberts calling one of the administration's arguments quote quirky.

0:03:23.040 --> 0:03:26.560
<v Speaker 5>Although it does appear the administration has some sympathy. I'll

0:03:26.720 --> 0:03:30.960
<v Speaker 5>give one example, Samuel Alito, Conservative Justice, saying that the

0:03:31.000 --> 0:03:35.000
<v Speaker 5>administration is likely correct that when they were ratifying the

0:03:35.040 --> 0:03:40.160
<v Speaker 5>fourteenth Amendment, the drafters weren't thinking about undocumented immigration. So

0:03:40.200 --> 0:03:41.960
<v Speaker 5>it's going to be something to watch here. But you're

0:03:42.040 --> 0:03:44.840
<v Speaker 5>exactly right. This is very unprecedented. The first time you've

0:03:44.840 --> 0:03:48.760
<v Speaker 5>ever seen a sitting US president president inside for oral

0:03:48.880 --> 0:03:51.240
<v Speaker 5>arguments as they decide the future of one of his

0:03:51.320 --> 0:03:52.000
<v Speaker 5>key policies.

0:03:52.040 --> 0:03:55.320
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Tyler Kendall with the latest outside the Supreme Court.

0:03:55.800 --> 0:03:58.000
<v Speaker 2>Let's turn out to the Middle East, where attentions remain

0:03:58.120 --> 0:04:01.200
<v Speaker 2>high as the war with Iran continues. President Trump said

0:04:01.200 --> 0:04:03.240
<v Speaker 2>he'll only consider a ceasefire if the straight of horn

0:04:03.280 --> 0:04:05.440
<v Speaker 2>moves is fully reopened. He is set to address the

0:04:05.520 --> 0:04:09.040
<v Speaker 2>nation tonight as questions grow over the path forward and

0:04:09.120 --> 0:04:12.120
<v Speaker 2>the broader economic impact from more. Let's bring in Bloomberg

0:04:12.120 --> 0:04:14.920
<v Speaker 2>Balance of Power co host Kaylee lines. Kaylee, the back

0:04:14.920 --> 0:04:17.719
<v Speaker 2>and forth between Washington and what we're hearing and what

0:04:17.760 --> 0:04:19.640
<v Speaker 2>we're learning out of Iran. There still seems to be

0:04:19.720 --> 0:04:21.000
<v Speaker 2>quite a bit of daylight there.

0:04:21.040 --> 0:04:24.560
<v Speaker 6>What can you tell us, Yeah, there certainly is tim

0:04:24.600 --> 0:04:26.839
<v Speaker 6>which is a repeated pattern in the US. As one thing,

0:04:27.000 --> 0:04:29.520
<v Speaker 6>Iran pushes back. There's also a repeated pattern that the

0:04:29.520 --> 0:04:31.719
<v Speaker 6>President says one thing or is reported to be considering

0:04:31.720 --> 0:04:34.000
<v Speaker 6>one thing, and then says another. As we are in

0:04:34.040 --> 0:04:36.080
<v Speaker 6>a very different place, it seems regarding the Straight of

0:04:36.080 --> 0:04:38.760
<v Speaker 6>Horn moves than what the Wall Street Journal indicated yesterday,

0:04:38.760 --> 0:04:40.919
<v Speaker 6>which was that the President was considering at least wrapping

0:04:41.000 --> 0:04:43.799
<v Speaker 6>up military operations without the straight reopening. Now he says

0:04:43.960 --> 0:04:46.560
<v Speaker 6>there will be no ceasefire if the Strait is not open.

0:04:46.640 --> 0:04:49.000
<v Speaker 6>But Iran is very much pushing back on that. In

0:04:49.040 --> 0:04:52.559
<v Speaker 6>a statement citing the Iranian Revolutionary guardcore in state media,

0:04:52.600 --> 0:04:54.440
<v Speaker 6>they said, and this is a quote, the Straight of

0:04:54.440 --> 0:04:57.080
<v Speaker 6>hor Mows will not be open based on the absurd

0:04:57.120 --> 0:05:00.240
<v Speaker 6>displays of the American President, going on to say, the

0:05:00.279 --> 0:05:03.400
<v Speaker 6>situation in the Strait is decisively and dominantly under the

0:05:03.440 --> 0:05:07.040
<v Speaker 6>control of the IRGC Navy. Now, of course, the US

0:05:07.040 --> 0:05:10.200
<v Speaker 6>military continues to strike that navy and other military targets.

0:05:10.200 --> 0:05:12.200
<v Speaker 6>The President alluding to that in a true social post

0:05:12.240 --> 0:05:15.080
<v Speaker 6>today in which he said that until the Strait is open,

0:05:15.120 --> 0:05:17.800
<v Speaker 6>free and clear, the US will continue to blaster on

0:05:17.839 --> 0:05:20.880
<v Speaker 6>into oblivion, or as they say, back to the Stone Ages.

0:05:20.920 --> 0:05:22.560
<v Speaker 6>So this is still a war that is ongoing, and

0:05:22.600 --> 0:05:24.839
<v Speaker 6>the President has indicated it could continue for at least

0:05:24.839 --> 0:05:27.200
<v Speaker 6>a few more weeks. He told reporters in the Oval

0:05:27.240 --> 0:05:29.640
<v Speaker 6>Office last night. It could be two to three weeks more,

0:05:29.680 --> 0:05:31.760
<v Speaker 6>and of course the entire nation will hear from him

0:05:31.760 --> 0:05:34.080
<v Speaker 6>at nine pm Eastern Time, also from the Oval in

0:05:34.120 --> 0:05:36.960
<v Speaker 6>which he is expected to address the future of this conflict.

0:05:36.960 --> 0:05:38.920
<v Speaker 6>Perhaps we will hear from him as to whether or

0:05:38.920 --> 0:05:42.920
<v Speaker 6>not he is considering actually deploying ground forces or another

0:05:43.160 --> 0:05:45.840
<v Speaker 6>surge operation, as we're seeing more assets deployed to the

0:05:45.839 --> 0:05:48.960
<v Speaker 6>Middle East, including a third aircraft carrier. Would he be

0:05:49.040 --> 0:05:51.440
<v Speaker 6>doing that if he did not intend to use it?

0:05:51.520 --> 0:05:53.320
<v Speaker 6>And we also can expect to hear from him on

0:05:53.400 --> 0:05:56.200
<v Speaker 6>the NATO alliance specifically, at least that's what he's told Reuters,

0:05:56.200 --> 0:05:59.440
<v Speaker 6>that he will be addressing our allies not coming to

0:05:59.520 --> 0:06:01.919
<v Speaker 6>the US AID when it comes to this war in Iran,

0:06:01.960 --> 0:06:04.599
<v Speaker 6>after he earlier told the Telegraph that NATO is just

0:06:04.640 --> 0:06:07.760
<v Speaker 6>a paper tiger and that he is seriously considering withdrawing

0:06:07.800 --> 0:06:08.720
<v Speaker 6>the United States from it.

0:06:08.800 --> 0:06:10.680
<v Speaker 2>Tim a lot for Joe and Kayla to keep an

0:06:10.680 --> 0:06:13.040
<v Speaker 2>eye on keep eye on them. One pm for the

0:06:13.080 --> 0:06:15.840
<v Speaker 2>early edition of Bloomberg Balance of Power Bloomberg Scaye Lions

0:06:15.920 --> 0:06:19.159
<v Speaker 2>joining us from Washington. Well, let's discuss the broader implications

0:06:19.160 --> 0:06:22.039
<v Speaker 2>of these latest developments, especially when it comes to tech markets.

0:06:22.040 --> 0:06:24.600
<v Speaker 2>I want to bring in Fiona Sencata, senior market analyst

0:06:24.680 --> 0:06:27.240
<v Speaker 2>and City Index for more. Fiona, I want to talk

0:06:27.279 --> 0:06:29.960
<v Speaker 2>about the de escalation trade that we saw and potentially

0:06:30.120 --> 0:06:33.000
<v Speaker 2>that we are seeing today. I should note that traders

0:06:33.000 --> 0:06:35.839
<v Speaker 2>at Goldman Sachs and JP Morgan are suggesting this was

0:06:36.160 --> 0:06:37.400
<v Speaker 2>mostly a squeeze.

0:06:37.839 --> 0:06:38.800
<v Speaker 3>What is it in your view?

0:06:38.839 --> 0:06:43.400
<v Speaker 2>Is it a squeeze or is it a de escalation trade.

0:06:43.520 --> 0:06:46.200
<v Speaker 7>It's a good question. I mean, it's not the first

0:06:46.240 --> 0:06:48.720
<v Speaker 7>time we've seen it, so I think there is reason

0:06:48.839 --> 0:06:51.600
<v Speaker 7>to be cautious about whether it really is a de

0:06:51.880 --> 0:06:54.359
<v Speaker 7>escalation trade or not. I mean, obviously we know the

0:06:54.440 --> 0:06:58.920
<v Speaker 7>Nazak fell almost five percent across March. It moved into

0:06:58.920 --> 0:07:04.960
<v Speaker 7>correction territory decline ten out of the past eleven twelve sorry,

0:07:05.000 --> 0:07:07.400
<v Speaker 7>ten out of the past eleven weeks. And it's rare

0:07:07.480 --> 0:07:11.040
<v Speaker 7>that we see such negativity towards tech stocks. So you know,

0:07:11.120 --> 0:07:14.880
<v Speaker 7>there really has been a lot of cell pressure on

0:07:15.400 --> 0:07:18.120
<v Speaker 7>the tech sector. But we are seeing that bounce back.

0:07:18.160 --> 0:07:20.680
<v Speaker 7>The daily performance yesterday was the best and almost a year,

0:07:21.000 --> 0:07:24.360
<v Speaker 7>and that de escalation trade or squeeze that we're talking

0:07:24.360 --> 0:07:25.680
<v Speaker 7>about is holding today.

0:07:25.960 --> 0:07:26.040
<v Speaker 8>Now.

0:07:26.120 --> 0:07:29.120
<v Speaker 7>I think there is reason to be cautious here, brickids.

0:07:29.240 --> 0:07:31.960
<v Speaker 7>I mean, although we've heard before from Trump that we

0:07:32.000 --> 0:07:34.680
<v Speaker 7>could be sort of you know, moving towards an end

0:07:34.760 --> 0:07:37.480
<v Speaker 7>to the war, the market I don't think is going

0:07:37.520 --> 0:07:41.960
<v Speaker 7>to be convinced until we see that straight off Hornmeuse reopen,

0:07:42.080 --> 0:07:44.160
<v Speaker 7>or at least you know, clear signs that we're heading

0:07:44.200 --> 0:07:47.120
<v Speaker 7>in that direction. And the reason for that is, brickis,

0:07:47.120 --> 0:07:51.640
<v Speaker 7>whilst oil priaces remain high, treasury yields are also going

0:07:51.720 --> 0:07:54.400
<v Speaker 7>to be remaining high, and that just sort of you know,

0:07:54.520 --> 0:07:59.480
<v Speaker 7>takes the the or hits demand for equities, and particularly

0:07:59.600 --> 0:08:01.320
<v Speaker 7>for tech stocks. We do tend to see that they

0:08:01.440 --> 0:08:04.440
<v Speaker 7>come under pressure as yields rise. Now, yields have come

0:08:04.480 --> 0:08:06.840
<v Speaker 7>back from that sort of almost four point five percent

0:08:06.880 --> 0:08:08.760
<v Speaker 7>that they are at on Friday to around four point

0:08:08.760 --> 0:08:10.760
<v Speaker 7>three today, But as I said, I think we really

0:08:10.800 --> 0:08:15.200
<v Speaker 7>would want to see more concrete signs of that straight

0:08:15.240 --> 0:08:18.440
<v Speaker 7>of Hall Mews reopening in order for this trade to

0:08:18.560 --> 0:08:22.000
<v Speaker 7>really gain much more traction and retake the some more

0:08:22.080 --> 0:08:23.120
<v Speaker 7>key levels on the way up.

0:08:23.200 --> 0:08:25.000
<v Speaker 2>I'm so glad you went there, because that's exactly what

0:08:25.040 --> 0:08:27.280
<v Speaker 2>I wanted to talk about. With the brand crewed above

0:08:27.280 --> 0:08:29.800
<v Speaker 2>one hundred dollars a barrel, WTI very close to one

0:08:29.880 --> 0:08:31.800
<v Speaker 2>hundred dollars a barrel. I think a lot of people

0:08:31.840 --> 0:08:33.640
<v Speaker 2>are scratching their heads saying, wait a second, why are

0:08:33.640 --> 0:08:37.640
<v Speaker 2>we seeing a surge in equities, especially tech if oil is.

0:08:37.559 --> 0:08:38.760
<v Speaker 3>Still this high?

0:08:38.840 --> 0:08:43.280
<v Speaker 2>Fiona to what extent our oil prices tied to tech stocks?

0:08:44.679 --> 0:08:47.640
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, so, I mean, you wouldn't necessarily immediately link the

0:08:47.640 --> 0:08:51.560
<v Speaker 7>two together. But as I said, that drive that elevated

0:08:51.640 --> 0:08:56.120
<v Speaker 7>oil price adds inflationary pressures globally, but particularly if we're

0:08:56.120 --> 0:08:58.960
<v Speaker 7>looking here in the US as well, and that just

0:08:59.080 --> 0:09:03.800
<v Speaker 7>really does keying those treasury yields elevated now. Also, that

0:09:03.880 --> 0:09:07.200
<v Speaker 7>also sort of supports the view that the Federal Reserve

0:09:07.320 --> 0:09:11.520
<v Speaker 7>is going to be taking potentially a more hawkish approach

0:09:11.559 --> 0:09:14.760
<v Speaker 7>to monetary policy. All of this ties into the fact

0:09:14.800 --> 0:09:18.800
<v Speaker 7>that we are seeing less support for tech stocks. Lower

0:09:18.960 --> 0:09:22.880
<v Speaker 7>lower yields are beneficial for stocks, but more importantly for

0:09:22.960 --> 0:09:26.400
<v Speaker 7>tech stocks because they reduce the discount rate apply to

0:09:26.480 --> 0:09:30.040
<v Speaker 7>future earnings, making valuations more attractive. So when we have

0:09:30.160 --> 0:09:34.400
<v Speaker 7>those higher yields, that really does make tech stocks less attractive. So,

0:09:34.440 --> 0:09:36.360
<v Speaker 7>as I said, you know, I think oil prices are

0:09:36.400 --> 0:09:39.079
<v Speaker 7>going to remain here, and I think interestingly, even if

0:09:39.120 --> 0:09:42.160
<v Speaker 7>we do see that straight of horn we's reopen, it

0:09:42.200 --> 0:09:46.199
<v Speaker 7>will take time for oil prices to come down. And

0:09:46.240 --> 0:09:48.360
<v Speaker 7>if they do come down, and when they do come down,

0:09:48.400 --> 0:09:51.440
<v Speaker 7>I guess the actual baseline rate is likely to be

0:09:51.520 --> 0:09:54.120
<v Speaker 7>much higher than what it has been, that sixty dollars

0:09:54.160 --> 0:09:57.080
<v Speaker 7>a barrel, more towards the eighty dollars a barrel, because

0:09:57.120 --> 0:09:59.960
<v Speaker 7>we're going to see it a longer period for the

0:10:00.040 --> 0:10:02.839
<v Speaker 7>that sort of normalization. But also I think there will

0:10:02.880 --> 0:10:05.240
<v Speaker 7>be a risk premium that will remain tied in there.

0:10:05.720 --> 0:10:07.960
<v Speaker 2>I want to throw something at you. It's private markets

0:10:08.000 --> 0:10:10.559
<v Speaker 2>now but expected to become a public equity this year,

0:10:10.800 --> 0:10:12.559
<v Speaker 2>and that's open AI. We're going to talk to Shrien

0:10:12.600 --> 0:10:15.600
<v Speaker 2>Gafari from our Bloomberg News team. She reported out yesterday

0:10:15.920 --> 0:10:19.320
<v Speaker 2>the eight hundred and fifty two billion dollar valuation after

0:10:19.360 --> 0:10:22.440
<v Speaker 2>a one hundred and twenty two billion dollar round. What

0:10:22.480 --> 0:10:27.600
<v Speaker 2>does a potential IPO of open AI and of anthropic

0:10:27.679 --> 0:10:31.200
<v Speaker 2>this year due to the broader tech equity market.

0:10:33.080 --> 0:10:36.280
<v Speaker 7>Now, I think it would be extremely exciting. I think

0:10:36.360 --> 0:10:40.760
<v Speaker 7>there would be a huge amount, unprecedented amount of interest,

0:10:41.520 --> 0:10:45.520
<v Speaker 7>and I think it would actually be positive for DAI train.

0:10:45.640 --> 0:10:49.640
<v Speaker 7>I think the AI train has come under pressure. We've

0:10:49.640 --> 0:10:51.680
<v Speaker 7>seen sort of, you know, a lot of questions about

0:10:51.880 --> 0:10:56.160
<v Speaker 7>where it's going, whether it is whether the rallies that

0:10:56.200 --> 0:10:59.079
<v Speaker 7>we've seen over the past sort of year, they've obviously

0:10:59.120 --> 0:11:02.480
<v Speaker 7>come into quest I would say over the past six months,

0:11:02.480 --> 0:11:05.880
<v Speaker 7>and I think sort of those IPOs going public in

0:11:05.920 --> 0:11:12.160
<v Speaker 7>those companies would actually potentially redrive attention and interest into

0:11:12.200 --> 0:11:12.720
<v Speaker 7>that trade.

0:11:13.480 --> 0:11:16.640
<v Speaker 2>Fiona Sinkata from City Index. Always good to check in

0:11:16.679 --> 0:11:19.920
<v Speaker 2>with you. Thanks for joining us on Bloomberg Tech. Well

0:11:19.920 --> 0:11:22.679
<v Speaker 2>coming up, as we just mentioned open ai closing one

0:11:22.679 --> 0:11:24.360
<v Speaker 2>of the biggest funding rounds in history.

0:11:24.360 --> 0:11:27.360
<v Speaker 3>We're gonna have the details next. This is Bloomberg Tech.

0:11:41.280 --> 0:11:43.320
<v Speaker 2>Open Ai is now valued at eight hundred and fifty

0:11:43.360 --> 0:11:46.640
<v Speaker 2>two billion dollars. The i company closed a one hundred

0:11:46.640 --> 0:11:49.120
<v Speaker 2>and twenty two billion dollar funding round intended to help

0:11:49.440 --> 0:11:53.319
<v Speaker 2>with its costly push for more chips, data centers, and talent.

0:11:53.679 --> 0:11:57.720
<v Speaker 2>Let's get the details with Bloomberg's Ai reporter Sharen Gafari, Shuran,

0:11:58.160 --> 0:12:00.720
<v Speaker 2>those are big numbers. I liken the piece you said,

0:12:01.200 --> 0:12:03.320
<v Speaker 2>this funding is by any measure, one of the largest

0:12:03.360 --> 0:12:07.160
<v Speaker 2>transactions in history dwarfing not just previous fundraising rounds by

0:12:07.200 --> 0:12:11.280
<v Speaker 2>fellow privately back startups, but also acquisitions and IPOs. Is

0:12:11.320 --> 0:12:14.200
<v Speaker 2>this it for open A before it goes public.

0:12:15.040 --> 0:12:18.360
<v Speaker 9>We don't know yet, but it definitely could be. You know,

0:12:18.440 --> 0:12:22.120
<v Speaker 9>in a press call with open Ai CFO, she talked

0:12:22.160 --> 0:12:26.400
<v Speaker 9>about how this helps them have maximum flexibility. If they

0:12:26.720 --> 0:12:29.400
<v Speaker 9>want to remain private for a little longer, they could.

0:12:29.480 --> 0:12:31.679
<v Speaker 9>If they want to go public, they also could.

0:12:32.640 --> 0:12:32.800
<v Speaker 5>You know.

0:12:32.880 --> 0:12:36.319
<v Speaker 9>Obviously, we are heading into a year where we are

0:12:36.360 --> 0:12:42.040
<v Speaker 9>expecting some AI IPOs, including potentially open AI. However, you know,

0:12:42.240 --> 0:12:46.360
<v Speaker 9>given a the macro uncertainty and changing conditions and be

0:12:46.480 --> 0:12:49.079
<v Speaker 9>the need for these companies to prove a very solid

0:12:49.120 --> 0:12:52.680
<v Speaker 9>path to profitability at least in the future as a IPO,

0:12:53.920 --> 0:12:56.880
<v Speaker 9>it's obviously too soon to say exactly when or if

0:12:56.920 --> 0:12:58.160
<v Speaker 9>these companies will this year.

0:12:58.360 --> 0:13:01.320
<v Speaker 2>Okay, these companies that includes Thropic. I just want to

0:13:01.360 --> 0:13:03.920
<v Speaker 2>flick out another piece that you wrote, this one along

0:13:03.960 --> 0:13:07.760
<v Speaker 2>with colleague Mark Anderson, about Anthropic accidentally exposing its system

0:13:07.760 --> 0:13:12.319
<v Speaker 2>behind claud code human error in this case, what exactly happened?

0:13:13.880 --> 0:13:16.600
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, so the company acknowledged that this was human error,

0:13:16.800 --> 0:13:20.320
<v Speaker 9>not a sort of hack. However, this is source code,

0:13:20.360 --> 0:13:23.560
<v Speaker 9>so this is the underlying material that goes into the

0:13:23.600 --> 0:13:27.640
<v Speaker 9>claud code product. We're already seeing some users try to

0:13:27.679 --> 0:13:31.360
<v Speaker 9>replicate that code now and put it out there, and

0:13:31.559 --> 0:13:34.240
<v Speaker 9>that is obviously that is not a good outcome for

0:13:34.280 --> 0:13:37.080
<v Speaker 9>the company. So it raises questions about what went wrong,

0:13:37.200 --> 0:13:39.680
<v Speaker 9>how they're going to stop that again, especially given earlier

0:13:40.280 --> 0:13:42.240
<v Speaker 9>in the past week they had another incident with a

0:13:42.320 --> 0:13:45.199
<v Speaker 9>leaked another kind of human error leaked blog.

0:13:44.920 --> 0:13:48.000
<v Speaker 2>Post Bloomberg shreen Gafari from our AI team. Check out

0:13:48.000 --> 0:13:50.480
<v Speaker 2>her reporting and the entire teams reporting on the Bloomberg

0:13:50.559 --> 0:13:52.559
<v Speaker 2>terminal and at Bloomberg dot Com.

0:13:52.880 --> 0:13:52.960
<v Speaker 5>Well.

0:13:52.960 --> 0:13:55.840
<v Speaker 2>At the same time, shares of OpenAI i've actually fallen

0:13:55.920 --> 0:13:59.439
<v Speaker 2>out of favor in the secondary markets. Investors have been

0:13:59.480 --> 0:14:01.560
<v Speaker 2>looking to offer load as much as six hundred million

0:14:01.640 --> 0:14:04.959
<v Speaker 2>dollars worth of shares, but finding no buyers, instead seeing

0:14:05.000 --> 0:14:09.560
<v Speaker 2>demand surging for rival Anthropic. Bloomberg's Hemaparmer covers hedge funds

0:14:09.600 --> 0:14:11.640
<v Speaker 2>and she joins us. Now, so how about what's going

0:14:11.679 --> 0:14:13.320
<v Speaker 2>on here, because it seems like there's this disconnect at

0:14:13.360 --> 0:14:15.120
<v Speaker 2>least with the latest funding round that I just talked

0:14:15.120 --> 0:14:18.640
<v Speaker 2>about with sharene and what you're seeing or what hedge

0:14:18.640 --> 0:14:20.560
<v Speaker 2>funds are seeing in the secondary market, what can you

0:14:20.560 --> 0:14:21.240
<v Speaker 2>tell us So.

0:14:21.200 --> 0:14:24.400
<v Speaker 10>The secondary market's really interesting and what they're paying attention

0:14:24.480 --> 0:14:27.760
<v Speaker 10>to right now is this evaluation gap. So the gap

0:14:27.800 --> 0:14:30.640
<v Speaker 10>between the three hundred and eighty billion dollar valuation for

0:14:30.720 --> 0:14:34.200
<v Speaker 10>Anthropic and this eight hundred and fifty two billion dollar

0:14:34.240 --> 0:14:37.480
<v Speaker 10>valuation for open AI. And if you are thinking that

0:14:37.760 --> 0:14:40.760
<v Speaker 10>Anthropic is going to have around in the future and

0:14:40.920 --> 0:14:42.920
<v Speaker 10>is going to close that gap and it could be

0:14:43.000 --> 0:14:46.760
<v Speaker 10>sizeably bigger, you might be looking to snap up Anthropic

0:14:46.800 --> 0:14:52.920
<v Speaker 10>shares now to get in early as that nap, as

0:14:52.920 --> 0:14:55.800
<v Speaker 10>that gap potentially narrows. And so when you look at

0:14:55.800 --> 0:14:58.040
<v Speaker 10>the two options, open AI may seem in less of

0:14:58.080 --> 0:15:01.640
<v Speaker 10>a favor compared to the hot we're seeing Anthropic shares

0:15:01.680 --> 0:15:04.040
<v Speaker 10>in the secondary going for a valuation of six hundred

0:15:04.080 --> 0:15:04.800
<v Speaker 10>million or more.

0:15:04.840 --> 0:15:08.040
<v Speaker 2>It's incredible. I mean, it just shows how quickly things

0:15:08.080 --> 0:15:10.360
<v Speaker 2>can shift. And we did see last week and move

0:15:10.400 --> 0:15:13.680
<v Speaker 2>away at least from Sora for open AI, maybe streamlining

0:15:13.760 --> 0:15:18.239
<v Speaker 2>before an IPO and also really leaning into what anthropics

0:15:18.280 --> 0:15:20.480
<v Speaker 2>bread and butter is the idea of coding and selling

0:15:20.560 --> 0:15:23.280
<v Speaker 2>to enterprise customers. What's amazing to me is really how

0:15:23.360 --> 0:15:26.320
<v Speaker 2>quickly this has shifted, and wonder if it can actually

0:15:26.320 --> 0:15:29.040
<v Speaker 2>shift back a different way anytime soon. How quickly do

0:15:29.040 --> 0:15:30.480
<v Speaker 2>you things move in the secondary market.

0:15:30.680 --> 0:15:33.560
<v Speaker 10>So the secondary market moves slower obviously than stocks would do,

0:15:34.040 --> 0:15:37.600
<v Speaker 10>but you can see changes within a few days, within

0:15:37.640 --> 0:15:40.760
<v Speaker 10>a few weeks. When you look at companies like open Ai,

0:15:40.840 --> 0:15:43.800
<v Speaker 10>there are some concerns about the spend and this raise

0:15:43.840 --> 0:15:46.440
<v Speaker 10>will help to absorb some of those costs. But when

0:15:46.480 --> 0:15:48.760
<v Speaker 10>you look at the expenditure that some of these companies

0:15:48.760 --> 0:15:51.840
<v Speaker 10>are making, an ai huge costs. And then when you

0:15:51.880 --> 0:15:55.360
<v Speaker 10>look at open Ai, these leading into enterprise a little

0:15:55.360 --> 0:15:57.720
<v Speaker 10>bit slower than Anthropic, but not to say, I mean

0:15:57.720 --> 0:16:01.040
<v Speaker 10>they've raised one hundred and twenty two billion dollars from investors.

0:16:01.280 --> 0:16:03.640
<v Speaker 10>The other thing to think about with the secondary is

0:16:03.680 --> 0:16:07.600
<v Speaker 10>sometimes existing investors may seek liquidity, not because they're souring

0:16:07.640 --> 0:16:09.440
<v Speaker 10>on the company, but they just either want some extra

0:16:09.480 --> 0:16:12.960
<v Speaker 10>money to play with, or you know, they see their

0:16:12.960 --> 0:16:15.080
<v Speaker 10>position as already sizable within their book.

0:16:15.200 --> 0:16:17.680
<v Speaker 2>Maybe you got to buy a house or a plane

0:16:17.800 --> 0:16:21.080
<v Speaker 2>or something I don't know. From Bloomberg, Sama Palmer, thanks

0:16:21.080 --> 0:16:23.480
<v Speaker 2>so much, shot out having a story on the terminal.

0:16:24.000 --> 0:16:26.680
<v Speaker 2>We got some breaking news right now, billionaire Elon Musk.

0:16:26.760 --> 0:16:31.600
<v Speaker 2>SpaceX has filed confidentially for an IPO. Let's check out

0:16:31.640 --> 0:16:34.160
<v Speaker 2>more about timing with that in just a few minutes.

0:16:34.200 --> 0:16:36.440
<v Speaker 2>We're going to have more details on that coming up.

0:16:36.640 --> 0:16:40.400
<v Speaker 2>In the meantime, a conversation on AI's expanding role in cybersecurity.

0:16:40.440 --> 0:16:43.600
<v Speaker 2>We're going to break with ARMD and CEO Kevin Nndia.

0:16:44.040 --> 0:16:59.120
<v Speaker 2>That's next on Bloomberg Tech. SpaceX has filed for an IPO.

0:16:59.280 --> 0:17:01.400
<v Speaker 2>Some breaking news. Let's get to our own Ed Ludlow,

0:17:01.400 --> 0:17:05.679
<v Speaker 2>who's at Kennedy Space Center in Florida, and this story

0:17:05.680 --> 0:17:08.679
<v Speaker 2>that you wrote along with Bailey Lipschaltz. JASEX said a

0:17:08.760 --> 0:17:12.280
<v Speaker 2>file confidentially for an IPO ahead of AI rivals. What

0:17:12.320 --> 0:17:14.000
<v Speaker 2>can you tell us about timing? What did you learn?

0:17:14.359 --> 0:17:14.560
<v Speaker 10>Yeah?

0:17:14.560 --> 0:17:17.040
<v Speaker 11>I mean the main thing and the important point of

0:17:17.160 --> 0:17:20.520
<v Speaker 11>us confirming via sources that the paperwork is in is

0:17:20.560 --> 0:17:24.480
<v Speaker 11>it probably does put SpaceX on track for a June IPO.

0:17:24.680 --> 0:17:27.240
<v Speaker 11>There has been lots of reporting about will they or

0:17:27.320 --> 0:17:30.440
<v Speaker 11>won't they you know, as a starter gun moment for

0:17:30.480 --> 0:17:33.480
<v Speaker 11>the broader IPO window. But of course, the mechanics of

0:17:33.520 --> 0:17:37.520
<v Speaker 11>what they're trying to do raising fifty billion dollars plus

0:17:37.520 --> 0:17:40.480
<v Speaker 11>maybe seventy five billion dollars at the high end at

0:17:40.480 --> 0:17:43.760
<v Speaker 11>evaluation of one point seventy five trillion, it's going to

0:17:43.800 --> 0:17:47.240
<v Speaker 11>take a very large coalition of bankers and banks to

0:17:47.320 --> 0:17:50.840
<v Speaker 11>run that book in what will be the biggest IPO

0:17:50.920 --> 0:17:53.840
<v Speaker 11>in history on a dollar raise or valuation perspective. So

0:17:54.320 --> 0:17:56.399
<v Speaker 11>we've known this was coming, but you know, it is

0:17:56.440 --> 0:17:59.520
<v Speaker 11>a big psychological moment for the markets that it's in,

0:17:59.640 --> 0:18:03.920
<v Speaker 11>and and you it sets SpaceX up to execute on

0:18:03.960 --> 0:18:06.040
<v Speaker 11>the groundwork that they've been putting into place for a

0:18:06.080 --> 0:18:06.520
<v Speaker 11>little while.

0:18:06.520 --> 0:18:07.560
<v Speaker 3>Now. It's a great piece.

0:18:07.560 --> 0:18:10.080
<v Speaker 2>We're going to have more from Ed Ludlow from Kennedy

0:18:10.160 --> 0:18:13.560
<v Speaker 2>Space Center a little later in the program. Breaking news

0:18:13.600 --> 0:18:16.080
<v Speaker 2>coming from Ed and Bailey. Check out their story on

0:18:16.240 --> 0:18:19.520
<v Speaker 2>the Bloomberg terminal for more. Well, as we mentioned, Anthropic

0:18:19.520 --> 0:18:22.320
<v Speaker 2>has accidentally exposed the source code behind its AI coding

0:18:22.320 --> 0:18:26.320
<v Speaker 2>assistant Claude. In an emailed statement, Anthropics said no customer

0:18:26.400 --> 0:18:29.399
<v Speaker 2>data or credentials were involved and that the issue was

0:18:29.400 --> 0:18:33.040
<v Speaker 2>caused by human error and not a security breach. The

0:18:33.080 --> 0:18:35.800
<v Speaker 2>incident comes as the company is pushing back against a

0:18:35.920 --> 0:18:39.760
<v Speaker 2>US government designation labeling it a potential supply chain risk.

0:18:40.160 --> 0:18:42.159
<v Speaker 2>Joining us now to discuss the role of AI in

0:18:42.240 --> 0:18:45.480
<v Speaker 2>cybersecurity is Kevin Mandia, CEO of our Modern It's an

0:18:45.520 --> 0:18:49.240
<v Speaker 2>AI platform that simulates real world attacks to identify and

0:18:49.280 --> 0:18:52.920
<v Speaker 2>fix vulnerabilities. And Kevin, that's exactly where I want to

0:18:53.000 --> 0:18:56.280
<v Speaker 2>start the vulnerabilities of this with that anthropic story that

0:18:56.280 --> 0:18:59.920
<v Speaker 2>I talked about with Sharen and just mentioned this vulnerability.

0:19:00.000 --> 0:19:02.400
<v Speaker 2>It seems to be as a result of user error,

0:19:02.440 --> 0:19:05.280
<v Speaker 2>not necessarily an attack. How do you look at that

0:19:05.320 --> 0:19:08.800
<v Speaker 2>in the context right of overall vulnerabilities when it comes

0:19:08.800 --> 0:19:11.400
<v Speaker 2>to the threat landscape today, Well.

0:19:11.320 --> 0:19:14.640
<v Speaker 4>No question, whenever you lose source code, there's a reputational hit.

0:19:14.800 --> 0:19:17.280
<v Speaker 4>But that's you know, when I looked at this case,

0:19:17.480 --> 0:19:21.080
<v Speaker 4>they didn't lose customer data, they didn't lose customer credentials,

0:19:21.200 --> 0:19:23.760
<v Speaker 4>they didn't lose customer model weights. And that's where the

0:19:23.880 --> 0:19:27.600
<v Speaker 4>magic happens when you use agents, because agents have total

0:19:27.640 --> 0:19:31.160
<v Speaker 4>recall on your data and how you purpose those agents.

0:19:31.160 --> 0:19:33.880
<v Speaker 4>So this is one of those things that happens to companies.

0:19:33.920 --> 0:19:35.840
<v Speaker 4>Whenever you have a human in the loop, you have

0:19:35.880 --> 0:19:40.600
<v Speaker 4>a process that's potentially frail or degrades over time, so

0:19:40.760 --> 0:19:43.480
<v Speaker 4>they're going to have to manage through the reputational.

0:19:43.320 --> 0:19:43.800
<v Speaker 3>Hit on this.

0:19:43.960 --> 0:19:46.600
<v Speaker 4>But at the same time frame, I'm a cybersecurity expert

0:19:46.680 --> 0:19:49.520
<v Speaker 4>and I look at this. Whenever you lose source code,

0:19:49.680 --> 0:19:52.400
<v Speaker 4>there will be folks that scour that looking at ways

0:19:52.520 --> 0:19:55.399
<v Speaker 4>to how does this software work and how do we

0:19:55.440 --> 0:19:58.240
<v Speaker 4>take advantage of it, maybe in this case with prompt injection.

0:19:58.640 --> 0:20:00.439
<v Speaker 4>So all you're really going to get out of this

0:20:00.560 --> 0:20:03.720
<v Speaker 4>tim is probably a faster release cycle because now you

0:20:03.720 --> 0:20:05.960
<v Speaker 4>have millions of people looking at your code that you

0:20:06.080 --> 0:20:08.720
<v Speaker 4>never intended to have them look at it. So you're

0:20:08.720 --> 0:20:10.679
<v Speaker 4>going to have a fast release cycle should there be

0:20:10.920 --> 0:20:15.040
<v Speaker 4>any identified vulnerabilities from the extra million sets of eyes

0:20:15.080 --> 0:20:16.560
<v Speaker 4>that are looking at your source code.

0:20:16.680 --> 0:20:19.040
<v Speaker 2>You were the founder and CEO of Mandian before it

0:20:19.080 --> 0:20:21.280
<v Speaker 2>was sold to people Cloud, your former CEO of Fire.

0:20:21.520 --> 0:20:25.359
<v Speaker 2>You have been doing this for decades. This era that

0:20:25.400 --> 0:20:29.080
<v Speaker 2>we live in right now with soon to be everybody

0:20:29.160 --> 0:20:31.720
<v Speaker 2>having an AI agent that can act on behalf of them,

0:20:32.160 --> 0:20:37.119
<v Speaker 2>and also seemingly perhaps bad actors having AI agents that

0:20:37.160 --> 0:20:40.000
<v Speaker 2>can act on them how does that look out there

0:20:40.040 --> 0:20:43.119
<v Speaker 2>today compared with other times in this industry? Are we

0:20:43.200 --> 0:20:44.919
<v Speaker 2>more vulnerable now than ever before?

0:20:46.119 --> 0:20:48.560
<v Speaker 4>That's a great question, Tim. I think we're going through

0:20:48.600 --> 0:20:50.639
<v Speaker 4>an inflection point. I hate that term, but it's just

0:20:50.760 --> 0:20:54.040
<v Speaker 4>dead reality. Whenever you see a shift change in technology,

0:20:54.080 --> 0:20:58.159
<v Speaker 4>the unfortunate reality is that usually mal intent can be

0:20:58.240 --> 0:21:01.840
<v Speaker 4>implemented faster than positive. That just is what happens. So

0:21:01.880 --> 0:21:04.280
<v Speaker 4>you look at the Internet. It allows people to commit

0:21:04.359 --> 0:21:07.480
<v Speaker 4>crimes or try to make money from nine thousand miles

0:21:07.480 --> 0:21:10.720
<v Speaker 4>away from where they perpetrate the crimes. And wherever money goes,

0:21:10.760 --> 0:21:14.120
<v Speaker 4>crime follows, wherever information goes, espionage follows.

0:21:14.320 --> 0:21:15.320
<v Speaker 3>That's our systems.

0:21:15.800 --> 0:21:19.280
<v Speaker 4>So you're going to see in under two years AI agents,

0:21:19.520 --> 0:21:22.000
<v Speaker 4>because they can think and learn and have total recall,

0:21:22.400 --> 0:21:25.960
<v Speaker 4>they will become the offense in the cyber domain. And

0:21:26.000 --> 0:21:28.760
<v Speaker 4>the cyber domain has always been contested, Tim, There's always

0:21:28.760 --> 0:21:31.240
<v Speaker 4>been bad guys on this, you know, on the Internet.

0:21:31.400 --> 0:21:35.320
<v Speaker 4>But now these bad guys or the espionage actors are

0:21:35.359 --> 0:21:37.160
<v Speaker 4>going to be able to use agents to work at

0:21:37.160 --> 0:21:40.119
<v Speaker 4>compute speed. So the change we're going to live in

0:21:40.200 --> 0:21:42.800
<v Speaker 4>the cyber domain is that you're going to see the

0:21:42.840 --> 0:21:47.080
<v Speaker 4>speed of attack go way up, so vulnerability discovery will

0:21:47.080 --> 0:21:50.280
<v Speaker 4>be condensed down to seconds rather than days or minutes.

0:21:50.640 --> 0:21:52.919
<v Speaker 4>And you're going to see over time, defense have to

0:21:52.920 --> 0:21:55.679
<v Speaker 4>be autonomous. It can't have humans in the loop. So

0:21:55.720 --> 0:21:57.600
<v Speaker 4>we're going to go through that inflection point over the

0:21:57.640 --> 0:21:58.479
<v Speaker 4>next two years.

0:21:59.080 --> 0:22:00.000
<v Speaker 3>But Agent to.

0:22:00.240 --> 0:22:03.320
<v Speaker 4>AI is absolutely going to speed up the risk that

0:22:03.440 --> 0:22:05.200
<v Speaker 4>everybody has in the cyber demand.

0:22:05.280 --> 0:22:07.560
<v Speaker 2>Kevin, then give me we only have twenty seconds left.

0:22:07.560 --> 0:22:09.399
<v Speaker 2>But how are you now doing that and addressing that

0:22:09.440 --> 0:22:10.440
<v Speaker 2>at our modern.

0:22:11.000 --> 0:22:13.080
<v Speaker 4>Well, we are addressing it. What you're going to see

0:22:13.200 --> 0:22:15.920
<v Speaker 4>is Armaden is going to be all offense, all the time.

0:22:16.359 --> 0:22:18.920
<v Speaker 4>We're going to be the agents that train your defense

0:22:18.960 --> 0:22:21.240
<v Speaker 4>of agents so you can respond at the speed of

0:22:21.280 --> 0:22:24.920
<v Speaker 4>compute and respond autonomously to the threats that emerge. New

0:22:24.960 --> 0:22:27.679
<v Speaker 4>and novel threats will be found by the good guys

0:22:27.720 --> 0:22:28.720
<v Speaker 4>before the bad guys.

0:22:28.960 --> 0:22:32.640
<v Speaker 2>Kevin Mandia, Armaden CEO joining us from San Francisco. Kevin,

0:22:32.640 --> 0:22:35.879
<v Speaker 2>good to see you well coming out. Intel moves to

0:22:35.960 --> 0:22:38.840
<v Speaker 2>back by back half a chip plan in Ireland, signally

0:22:38.920 --> 0:22:41.520
<v Speaker 2>renewed confidence. Look at the stock up more than nine

0:22:41.560 --> 0:22:43.719
<v Speaker 2>point nine percent today. We're going to have more on

0:22:43.720 --> 0:22:57.680
<v Speaker 2>that deal next. This is Bloomberg. Welcome back to Bloomberg Tech.

0:22:57.680 --> 0:22:59.960
<v Speaker 2>I'm Tim Seneveek in New York. Let's take a look

0:23:00.119 --> 0:23:04.200
<v Speaker 2>at markets on this first trading day of the second quarter,

0:23:04.560 --> 0:23:08.240
<v Speaker 2>after a really bruising first quarter of the year. The

0:23:08.359 --> 0:23:10.960
<v Speaker 2>S and P five hundred up about one percent right now,

0:23:11.000 --> 0:23:14.280
<v Speaker 2>Nasdaq one hundred up one point four percent. This after

0:23:14.320 --> 0:23:16.600
<v Speaker 2>a really bruising first quarter where the Nasdaq one hundred

0:23:16.600 --> 0:23:18.920
<v Speaker 2>fell about six percent, the S and P five hundred

0:23:19.000 --> 0:23:22.600
<v Speaker 2>fell about four point six percent. Rendcrud still above one

0:23:22.680 --> 0:23:25.920
<v Speaker 2>hundred dollars a barrel, The war in Iran still weighing

0:23:26.000 --> 0:23:30.000
<v Speaker 2>on overall sentiment. You can see Brent down two dollars

0:23:30.000 --> 0:23:33.160
<v Speaker 2>a barrel. That's about two percent. But at these elevated levels,

0:23:33.200 --> 0:23:35.560
<v Speaker 2>still a lot of questions about what the duration of

0:23:35.600 --> 0:23:37.560
<v Speaker 2>this conflict actually looks like.

0:23:38.080 --> 0:23:38.240
<v Speaker 3>Well.

0:23:38.240 --> 0:23:41.440
<v Speaker 2>Serves of Intel are surging right now. The chip maker

0:23:41.480 --> 0:23:43.639
<v Speaker 2>has agreed to pay fourteen point two billion dollars to

0:23:43.680 --> 0:23:46.679
<v Speaker 2>buy back half a plan in Ireland that it previously

0:23:46.720 --> 0:23:51.119
<v Speaker 2>sold to Apollo Global Management. Bloomberg Ian King covers semiconductors,

0:23:51.200 --> 0:23:53.359
<v Speaker 2>and he joins US now from San Francisco.

0:23:53.840 --> 0:23:54.040
<v Speaker 3>Ian.

0:23:54.040 --> 0:23:58.200
<v Speaker 2>The stock reaction to news such as this What does

0:23:58.200 --> 0:24:01.120
<v Speaker 2>that represent about how investors are thinking about Intel right now?

0:24:02.000 --> 0:24:04.280
<v Speaker 12>Well, they said themselves that this is kind of a

0:24:04.320 --> 0:24:06.959
<v Speaker 12>sign of confidence in where their business is going, and

0:24:07.520 --> 0:24:10.080
<v Speaker 12>it would appear from the reaction that investors have taken

0:24:10.080 --> 0:24:13.000
<v Speaker 12>them at their word and believing that the sort of

0:24:13.040 --> 0:24:17.560
<v Speaker 12>background to this is that suddenly the CPU, the chip

0:24:17.600 --> 0:24:21.040
<v Speaker 12>that Intel specializes in, has become kind of an area

0:24:21.080 --> 0:24:23.359
<v Speaker 12>of interest again and people are betting that this is

0:24:23.400 --> 0:24:26.159
<v Speaker 12>going to be part of AI data centers to a

0:24:26.160 --> 0:24:27.600
<v Speaker 12>greater extent going forward.

0:24:27.840 --> 0:24:30.320
<v Speaker 2>Is that what changed between now and a couple of

0:24:30.400 --> 0:24:35.920
<v Speaker 2>years ago ian when Intel sold this steak in this facility.

0:24:36.720 --> 0:24:40.120
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, I mean, what's really changes Intel's balance sheet? When

0:24:40.240 --> 0:24:43.199
<v Speaker 12>they sold this steak to Apollo, they were you know,

0:24:43.280 --> 0:24:45.960
<v Speaker 12>this was just one of a number of deals that

0:24:46.000 --> 0:24:49.400
<v Speaker 12>they were doing basically to get liquidity to make sure

0:24:49.400 --> 0:24:51.880
<v Speaker 12>that that balance sheet wasn't going to drag them down

0:24:51.920 --> 0:24:55.800
<v Speaker 12>even further. Since then, they've got money from the US taxpayer,

0:24:55.960 --> 0:24:59.760
<v Speaker 12>from Nvidia, from soft Bank, and you know, business has

0:24:59.760 --> 0:25:04.400
<v Speaker 12>st to improve, the losses have definitely narrowed. So what

0:25:04.440 --> 0:25:07.920
<v Speaker 12>they're doing here is basically saying, hey, this plant can

0:25:07.960 --> 0:25:10.080
<v Speaker 12>be a money maker going forward. We want to own

0:25:10.359 --> 0:25:12.320
<v Speaker 12>all of it, and therefore we're going to do that.

0:25:12.400 --> 0:25:14.359
<v Speaker 12>Now we're going to use our improved balance sheet.

0:25:14.440 --> 0:25:15.240
<v Speaker 3>Okay, eighteen A.

0:25:15.400 --> 0:25:18.320
<v Speaker 2>The technology that's being rolled out first in the company's

0:25:18.400 --> 0:25:19.320
<v Speaker 2>US factories.

0:25:19.560 --> 0:25:20.119
<v Speaker 3>What does it do?

0:25:21.320 --> 0:25:25.119
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, I mean, this is their latest production technology, and

0:25:25.160 --> 0:25:27.960
<v Speaker 12>this is supposed to get them essentially back in the game.

0:25:28.400 --> 0:25:31.679
<v Speaker 12>The better your production technology, remember with advanced semi reconductors,

0:25:31.720 --> 0:25:34.359
<v Speaker 12>the better your products are. So this is supposed to

0:25:34.400 --> 0:25:36.879
<v Speaker 12>sort of intel on the front line of what this

0:25:36.960 --> 0:25:39.840
<v Speaker 12>industry is capable of and make it sort of comparable

0:25:39.880 --> 0:25:43.080
<v Speaker 12>to what TSMC is doing. But the next one fourteen A,

0:25:43.240 --> 0:25:45.640
<v Speaker 12>that's going to be the real test whether that gets

0:25:45.680 --> 0:25:48.520
<v Speaker 12>off the ground and whether, as Intel claims, it'll get

0:25:48.560 --> 0:25:51.280
<v Speaker 12>it back to the absolute forefront of what's out there.

0:25:51.720 --> 0:25:55.080
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg's Ian King cover semiconductors out there in our San

0:25:55.080 --> 0:25:58.560
<v Speaker 2>Francisco bureau. Ian, thanks for joining us on Bloomberg Tech Well.

0:25:58.640 --> 0:26:01.840
<v Speaker 2>Child development experts are calling for YouTube to ban AI

0:26:01.960 --> 0:26:05.040
<v Speaker 2>generated videos from the feeds of young users. More than

0:26:05.080 --> 0:26:08.840
<v Speaker 2>two hundred children specialists, advocacy groups and schools send a

0:26:08.920 --> 0:26:11.919
<v Speaker 2>letter to the CEOs of YouTube and its parent Google.

0:26:12.280 --> 0:26:15.359
<v Speaker 2>Let's get the details with Bloomberg social media reporter Alexandra

0:26:15.440 --> 0:26:20.280
<v Speaker 2>Levine Alexandra Good that have you hear the concern about

0:26:20.280 --> 0:26:23.120
<v Speaker 2>AI slop or so called AI slop? Well, in fact,

0:26:23.119 --> 0:26:25.800
<v Speaker 2>that's what Google or that's what YouTube CEO has called

0:26:25.800 --> 0:26:28.520
<v Speaker 2>it in the past. How does that affect or how

0:26:28.520 --> 0:26:30.919
<v Speaker 2>do these advocates say that affects a child's brain differently

0:26:31.000 --> 0:26:33.240
<v Speaker 2>than a traditional short form video that may have been

0:26:33.440 --> 0:26:35.040
<v Speaker 2>made by actual human being.

0:26:35.480 --> 0:26:35.720
<v Speaker 11>Yeah.

0:26:35.720 --> 0:26:39.040
<v Speaker 13>Well, as we know, concerns about kids and screens and

0:26:39.080 --> 0:26:41.760
<v Speaker 13>how much time we're spending in front of platforms like

0:26:41.800 --> 0:26:44.560
<v Speaker 13>YouTube are not new. What is new here is sort

0:26:44.560 --> 0:26:47.160
<v Speaker 13>of the aipiece of this. The growing concern about AI

0:26:47.200 --> 0:26:50.600
<v Speaker 13>in particular is that as young minds are developing, child

0:26:50.720 --> 0:26:55.040
<v Speaker 13>development psychologists and other medical experts are worried that children

0:26:55.080 --> 0:26:57.240
<v Speaker 13>are not going to be able to understand the difference

0:26:57.240 --> 0:26:59.439
<v Speaker 13>between what is real and what is not, what is

0:26:59.480 --> 0:27:02.240
<v Speaker 13>truth and what is not. There's also concern that because

0:27:02.240 --> 0:27:06.119
<v Speaker 13>AI slop tends to be very eye catching, very clickbaity,

0:27:06.200 --> 0:27:09.800
<v Speaker 13>very spammy, that that will be more time spent in

0:27:09.840 --> 0:27:13.480
<v Speaker 13>front of the screen, and that time spend in front

0:27:13.480 --> 0:27:15.360
<v Speaker 13>of a screen, they're concerned, is going to be displacing

0:27:15.440 --> 0:27:19.040
<v Speaker 13>other kinds of real life activities that are key to emotional, social,

0:27:19.160 --> 0:27:20.160
<v Speaker 13>cognitive development.

0:27:20.240 --> 0:27:21.399
<v Speaker 3>Where does YouTube come in on this?

0:27:21.480 --> 0:27:23.720
<v Speaker 2>Because they have in recent years rolled out an entire

0:27:23.880 --> 0:27:26.879
<v Speaker 2>slate of tools that are supposed to be part of

0:27:26.880 --> 0:27:28.520
<v Speaker 2>this YouTube kids platform.

0:27:28.760 --> 0:27:30.000
<v Speaker 3>Where do they fall?

0:27:30.200 --> 0:27:33.160
<v Speaker 13>YouTube has said that their priority for twenty twenty six,

0:27:33.240 --> 0:27:35.080
<v Speaker 13>or one of their key priorities for this year is

0:27:35.160 --> 0:27:37.600
<v Speaker 13>managing AI slop and making sure that YouTube remains a

0:27:37.640 --> 0:27:40.880
<v Speaker 13>place where where people want to be spending their time.

0:27:41.200 --> 0:27:44.480
<v Speaker 13>They have said that they have labels that they show.

0:27:44.560 --> 0:27:46.919
<v Speaker 13>I think these advocates are concerned kids can't actually read

0:27:46.960 --> 0:27:50.000
<v Speaker 13>the labels and oftentimes the labels are not actually appearing.

0:27:50.800 --> 0:27:53.159
<v Speaker 13>And Google has put out this whole slate of of

0:27:53.200 --> 0:27:57.119
<v Speaker 13>AI tools, but the advocates really feel like that is

0:27:57.119 --> 0:27:59.480
<v Speaker 13>putting the onus on parents and caregivers and the kids

0:27:59.520 --> 0:28:02.680
<v Speaker 13>themselves to be trying to avoid and dodge AI generated

0:28:02.720 --> 0:28:05.840
<v Speaker 13>content on the platform, versus YouTube actually taking the productive

0:28:05.880 --> 0:28:08.439
<v Speaker 13>step of just wiping it for younger users, and broadly

0:28:08.600 --> 0:28:09.080
<v Speaker 13>we could.

0:28:08.960 --> 0:28:10.560
<v Speaker 2>I mean, we don't have time to talk about this,

0:28:10.640 --> 0:28:13.720
<v Speaker 2>but it enters the whole debate about whether kids should

0:28:13.720 --> 0:28:16.359
<v Speaker 2>even have access to this stuff in the first place.

0:28:16.400 --> 0:28:20.520
<v Speaker 2>So the story continues US. Alexander Levine of Bloomberg News,

0:28:20.600 --> 0:28:23.879
<v Speaker 2>thanks so much well. A new report finds US government

0:28:23.880 --> 0:28:27.760
<v Speaker 2>requests for user data from tech companies have skyrocketed by

0:28:27.800 --> 0:28:31.000
<v Speaker 2>seven hundred and seventy percent in the past decade. The

0:28:31.119 --> 0:28:35.320
<v Speaker 2>research from privacy company Proton was based on public transparency

0:28:35.320 --> 0:28:38.920
<v Speaker 2>reports from Apple, Google, and Meta. It shows the increase

0:28:38.960 --> 0:28:43.120
<v Speaker 2>has been bipartisan. A Google spokesperson told Bloomberg that it

0:28:43.200 --> 0:28:45.920
<v Speaker 2>reviews each request to ensure it complies with the law.

0:28:46.360 --> 0:28:49.600
<v Speaker 2>Meta said the number of fulfilled requests has remained consistent

0:28:49.680 --> 0:28:53.240
<v Speaker 2>despite the government's increase. Apple didn't respond to a request

0:28:53.360 --> 0:28:58.040
<v Speaker 2>for comment. Coming up, AI data center, city supply chain bottleneck.

0:28:58.640 --> 0:29:01.760
<v Speaker 2>What's showing and slowing the infrastructure build out?

0:29:02.600 --> 0:29:07.800
<v Speaker 3>That's next? Also watching chairs of Eli.

0:29:07.800 --> 0:29:11.080
<v Speaker 2>Lily's weight loss pill won US approval, ratcheting up pressure

0:29:11.160 --> 0:29:14.360
<v Speaker 2>on Novo nor Disc, which launched an obesity pill earlier

0:29:14.400 --> 0:29:17.160
<v Speaker 2>this year. The review process took less than four months

0:29:17.240 --> 0:29:19.880
<v Speaker 2>thanks to a new FDA program designed to expedi access

0:29:19.920 --> 0:29:25.360
<v Speaker 2>to promising medications that meet national priorities. This is Bloomberg Tech.

0:29:33.560 --> 0:29:37.000
<v Speaker 2>The US's AI ambitions are hitting a key bottleneck. Power

0:29:37.400 --> 0:29:39.719
<v Speaker 2>Nearly half of the data centers planned for this year

0:29:39.840 --> 0:29:42.880
<v Speaker 2>are now expected to be delayed or canceled as the

0:29:42.960 --> 0:29:46.440
<v Speaker 2>country grapples with a shortage of critical electrical equipment and

0:29:46.480 --> 0:29:51.080
<v Speaker 2>a growing reliance on imports, particularly from China. Bloomberg Examily

0:29:51.120 --> 0:29:54.120
<v Speaker 2>Foregash has the report, Emily, how did we find ourselves

0:29:54.200 --> 0:29:57.440
<v Speaker 2>in a position where we were so reliant on China

0:29:57.600 --> 0:29:58.440
<v Speaker 2>for these products?

0:29:58.840 --> 0:29:59.040
<v Speaker 5>Yeah?

0:29:59.120 --> 0:30:02.720
<v Speaker 8>So the U US manufacturing capacity for these really key

0:30:02.840 --> 0:30:06.200
<v Speaker 8>critical electrical parts that help get data centers up and

0:30:06.280 --> 0:30:08.680
<v Speaker 8>running is just not enough right now to meet the

0:30:08.840 --> 0:30:12.520
<v Speaker 8>booming demand to get all the data centers that companies

0:30:12.520 --> 0:30:14.280
<v Speaker 8>are building actually up and running.

0:30:14.760 --> 0:30:18.720
<v Speaker 2>There's this paradox between the presidents of America's America First policy,

0:30:18.760 --> 0:30:21.680
<v Speaker 2>the goal of beating China in the AI rise.

0:30:22.280 --> 0:30:24.840
<v Speaker 3>How does the US sort of thread this needle?

0:30:25.360 --> 0:30:28.240
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, so the President wants an American First doctrine and

0:30:28.280 --> 0:30:32.000
<v Speaker 8>wants American manufacturing to build these data centers, but we're

0:30:32.080 --> 0:30:35.440
<v Speaker 8>relying on key parts from foreign countries, including China, to

0:30:35.520 --> 0:30:38.600
<v Speaker 8>beat China in the AI race, whereas China is somewhat

0:30:38.600 --> 0:30:40.960
<v Speaker 8>reliant on the US for its chips to beat the

0:30:41.040 --> 0:30:42.040
<v Speaker 8>US and the AI race.

0:30:42.120 --> 0:30:43.320
<v Speaker 2>I want to go back to the set that I

0:30:43.320 --> 0:30:44.960
<v Speaker 2>read at the top, close to half of the data

0:30:45.000 --> 0:30:47.080
<v Speaker 2>center's plan for this year are now expected to be

0:30:47.120 --> 0:30:50.360
<v Speaker 2>delayed or canceled. What does this mean for the hyperscalers

0:30:50.760 --> 0:30:53.200
<v Speaker 2>who have come out quarter after quarter and said, we

0:30:53.240 --> 0:30:56.760
<v Speaker 2>are actually spending X billions of dollars this year on

0:30:56.840 --> 0:30:57.680
<v Speaker 2>these data centers?

0:30:57.720 --> 0:30:59.720
<v Speaker 3>Does that money? Where does that money go? Yeah, it's a.

0:30:59.680 --> 0:31:01.960
<v Speaker 8>Great and that's the million dollar question, or maybe six

0:31:02.000 --> 0:31:05.800
<v Speaker 8>hundred and fifty billion dollar questions. So basically half of

0:31:05.840 --> 0:31:07.600
<v Speaker 8>the data centers that are scheduled to be built this

0:31:07.680 --> 0:31:10.320
<v Speaker 8>year might not actually come online this year. And that's

0:31:10.360 --> 0:31:12.959
<v Speaker 8>because only around a third of those data centers are

0:31:12.960 --> 0:31:16.160
<v Speaker 8>actually under construction right now, and data centers take at

0:31:16.280 --> 0:31:18.880
<v Speaker 8>least a year if not more, to actually build. So

0:31:18.960 --> 0:31:21.240
<v Speaker 8>that's where siteline Climate is kind of getting their risk

0:31:21.280 --> 0:31:22.440
<v Speaker 8>evaluation from.

0:31:22.200 --> 0:31:24.560
<v Speaker 2>All right, Emily four goash with the latest check out

0:31:24.600 --> 0:31:26.920
<v Speaker 2>her reporting and the team's reporting on the terminal at

0:31:26.920 --> 0:31:30.040
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg dot com. All of this comes as Washington is

0:31:30.080 --> 0:31:33.280
<v Speaker 2>way how to build a national framework for artificial intelligence

0:31:33.280 --> 0:31:35.840
<v Speaker 2>and how to ensure the US can actually deliver on

0:31:35.880 --> 0:31:39.000
<v Speaker 2>its AI leadership goals. Joining US now is Kevin Frazier,

0:31:39.080 --> 0:31:42.080
<v Speaker 2>adjunct Research fellow at the Cato Institute, Kevin, I want

0:31:42.120 --> 0:31:44.960
<v Speaker 2>to start where we left off with Emily just now,

0:31:44.960 --> 0:31:46.959
<v Speaker 2>in this bottleneck that we're seeing when it comes to

0:31:47.360 --> 0:31:49.600
<v Speaker 2>developing these data centers, What, in your view would be

0:31:49.640 --> 0:31:52.800
<v Speaker 2>the right policy to decrease the US reliance on China

0:31:52.800 --> 0:31:53.640
<v Speaker 2>for these key parts.

0:31:54.720 --> 0:31:57.160
<v Speaker 14>Yeah, so, first and foremost, we need to consider this

0:31:57.280 --> 0:32:01.160
<v Speaker 14>AI infrastructure build out as a national chain. We've seen

0:32:01.200 --> 0:32:05.160
<v Speaker 14>that across eleven different states, there have been considerations of

0:32:05.240 --> 0:32:09.120
<v Speaker 14>bands or years long moratoria on data center creation. And

0:32:09.600 --> 0:32:12.160
<v Speaker 14>as you know, well, data centers aren't just for AI.

0:32:12.480 --> 0:32:15.760
<v Speaker 14>We need data centers for healthcare, for commerce, for all

0:32:15.800 --> 0:32:18.800
<v Speaker 14>the things that make the Internet go. And so we

0:32:18.880 --> 0:32:22.719
<v Speaker 14>need to really emphasize that states, cities, and the national

0:32:22.720 --> 0:32:24.720
<v Speaker 14>government all have a role in making sure we can

0:32:24.720 --> 0:32:27.920
<v Speaker 14>build AI infrastructure that's aligned with our AI ambitions.

0:32:28.000 --> 0:32:31.000
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so, yes, in my backyard is certainly, in your view,

0:32:31.320 --> 0:32:33.440
<v Speaker 2>a big part of this, but that still doesn't address

0:32:33.480 --> 0:32:36.480
<v Speaker 2>that the component problem that Emily and the team highlighted

0:32:36.720 --> 0:32:39.240
<v Speaker 2>in her piece. How do you make sure that the

0:32:39.320 --> 0:32:42.680
<v Speaker 2>US actually has access to these key components, these key parts,

0:32:43.160 --> 0:32:45.200
<v Speaker 2>when China has a stronghold on them.

0:32:45.680 --> 0:32:47.640
<v Speaker 14>So this is where we really do need to work

0:32:47.640 --> 0:32:51.840
<v Speaker 14>with our allies and developing and strong arming our supply

0:32:51.920 --> 0:32:55.959
<v Speaker 14>chain network across the entire AI techtack. As you've noted,

0:32:56.160 --> 0:32:58.000
<v Speaker 14>we've seen that when it comes to chips, when it

0:32:58.000 --> 0:33:00.840
<v Speaker 14>comes to things like helium that's being up and cutter,

0:33:01.240 --> 0:33:03.240
<v Speaker 14>we have a long ways to go in terms of

0:33:03.280 --> 0:33:05.480
<v Speaker 14>making sure that we have that sort of resilience and

0:33:05.560 --> 0:33:08.720
<v Speaker 14>redundancy that's required to build AI at scale. And so

0:33:09.120 --> 0:33:14.120
<v Speaker 14>this requires ultimately, unsurprisingly funding and political leadership, and right

0:33:14.160 --> 0:33:16.920
<v Speaker 14>now we're seeing that there's a sort of tendency to

0:33:17.000 --> 0:33:20.040
<v Speaker 14>not be swimming in the same direction on this AI question,

0:33:20.280 --> 0:33:23.400
<v Speaker 14>and that's in part for understandable reasons. But ultimately we

0:33:23.440 --> 0:33:25.360
<v Speaker 14>need to make this a national priority.

0:33:25.040 --> 0:33:27.400
<v Speaker 2>Funding from whom though Kevin, a national priority? Does that

0:33:27.440 --> 0:33:29.760
<v Speaker 2>mean you want to see the US government and taxpayers

0:33:29.760 --> 0:33:30.959
<v Speaker 2>shell out money for this stuff?

0:33:31.760 --> 0:33:34.320
<v Speaker 14>I do want to see increase investment from the US

0:33:34.400 --> 0:33:37.400
<v Speaker 14>government in this domain. We've seen over the history of

0:33:37.440 --> 0:33:40.920
<v Speaker 14>our nation that when it comes to critical infrastructure, ultimately

0:33:40.920 --> 0:33:43.400
<v Speaker 14>the central government does have a role in making sure

0:33:43.440 --> 0:33:46.200
<v Speaker 14>we have a national highway system, in making sure that

0:33:46.280 --> 0:33:48.520
<v Speaker 14>our ports system is resilient to go all the way

0:33:48.560 --> 0:33:51.720
<v Speaker 14>back to the Articles of Confederation. So yes, this ultimately

0:33:51.880 --> 0:33:54.239
<v Speaker 14>is a core purpose of the government is to make

0:33:54.280 --> 0:33:57.800
<v Speaker 14>sure that basic infrastructure for the technologies of an age

0:33:58.160 --> 0:34:01.880
<v Speaker 14>is available and not subject to geopolitical conflict.

0:34:02.080 --> 0:34:05.400
<v Speaker 2>So your view is that infrastructure such as this is

0:34:05.480 --> 0:34:09.239
<v Speaker 2>as important, at least historically in the current context, as highways,

0:34:09.360 --> 0:34:12.040
<v Speaker 2>as poor as other huge national projects. How do you

0:34:12.080 --> 0:34:13.080
<v Speaker 2>get leaders on board with this?

0:34:14.200 --> 0:34:16.600
<v Speaker 14>So first and foremost, we have to do a lot

0:34:16.600 --> 0:34:19.120
<v Speaker 14>of work in terms of just making sure we're addressing

0:34:19.200 --> 0:34:21.360
<v Speaker 14>a lot of the myths that are being spread about

0:34:21.440 --> 0:34:24.000
<v Speaker 14>this AI build out. So, for example, there was an

0:34:24.080 --> 0:34:27.799
<v Speaker 14>article recently that made headwinds and made the rounds on

0:34:27.840 --> 0:34:31.480
<v Speaker 14>social media about how data centers were creating heat islands

0:34:31.960 --> 0:34:34.360
<v Speaker 14>wherever they were being built. Well, if you talk to

0:34:34.400 --> 0:34:37.120
<v Speaker 14>folks like Andy Masley, who studied this issue closer than

0:34:37.200 --> 0:34:39.239
<v Speaker 14>just about anyone, we see that a lot of this

0:34:39.400 --> 0:34:42.600
<v Speaker 14>information is in fact bunk. And so the more that

0:34:42.719 --> 0:34:45.920
<v Speaker 14>we have sort of misinformation flowing about how AI is

0:34:45.960 --> 0:34:49.440
<v Speaker 14>being used and developed, those are ultimately distracting questions, and

0:34:49.480 --> 0:34:51.960
<v Speaker 14>we need to move on to the questions related to

0:34:52.000 --> 0:34:55.880
<v Speaker 14>the fact that AI is increasingly a national security imperative.

0:34:56.120 --> 0:34:59.000
<v Speaker 14>We're seeing right now, for example, in the war in Iran,

0:34:59.360 --> 0:35:03.080
<v Speaker 14>that military are using AI in ever more sophisticated domains,

0:35:03.200 --> 0:35:06.719
<v Speaker 14>and it's a real national imperative that the US military

0:35:07.000 --> 0:35:10.200
<v Speaker 14>have access to leading frontier models that are the most

0:35:10.280 --> 0:35:12.759
<v Speaker 14>capable and that are the most reliable across the world.

0:35:12.920 --> 0:35:15.080
<v Speaker 2>Kevin, you study this stuff, so maybe you have an answer,

0:35:15.120 --> 0:35:16.759
<v Speaker 2>because it certainly doesn't seem like a lot of people

0:35:16.800 --> 0:35:19.880
<v Speaker 2>do have answers to this. If we look at increased

0:35:19.880 --> 0:35:23.080
<v Speaker 2>demand for electricity across the grid and the way that

0:35:23.080 --> 0:35:25.160
<v Speaker 2>the grid is being taxed in a way now that

0:35:25.160 --> 0:35:27.439
<v Speaker 2>many people didn't think it would be in the year

0:35:27.480 --> 0:35:30.440
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty six, and the projections for the future, how

0:35:30.480 --> 0:35:32.960
<v Speaker 2>do you balance the desire and the need in your view,

0:35:32.960 --> 0:35:35.600
<v Speaker 2>to build these data centers in the US drawing power

0:35:36.200 --> 0:35:40.280
<v Speaker 2>from American power plants, but also make sure that American

0:35:40.320 --> 0:35:44.560
<v Speaker 2>consumers aren't seeing hiked power bills as a result. Is

0:35:44.600 --> 0:35:45.440
<v Speaker 2>it even possible?

0:35:46.600 --> 0:35:49.000
<v Speaker 14>I would say it is indeed possible. So I'm a

0:35:49.000 --> 0:35:51.520
<v Speaker 14>man of many tired lines. One of my tired lines

0:35:51.600 --> 0:35:54.759
<v Speaker 14>is today's AI is the worst AI we will ever use.

0:35:55.080 --> 0:35:57.959
<v Speaker 14>I'll also say that today's data centers are the worst

0:35:58.080 --> 0:36:01.600
<v Speaker 14>data centers will ever use a huge incentive for these

0:36:01.719 --> 0:36:06.680
<v Speaker 14>hyperscalers to invest in means for more efficient data center operations.

0:36:06.920 --> 0:36:09.640
<v Speaker 14>And we're seeing that states like Oklahoma, for example, are

0:36:09.760 --> 0:36:13.440
<v Speaker 14>enabling behind the meter power that allows for these labs

0:36:13.680 --> 0:36:17.200
<v Speaker 14>to build out more renewable and efficient data center operations.

0:36:17.320 --> 0:36:19.560
<v Speaker 14>And so we've actually seen that when you talk to

0:36:19.640 --> 0:36:23.480
<v Speaker 14>folks like Gavin McCormick at Climate Trace, that there are

0:36:23.480 --> 0:36:27.600
<v Speaker 14>opportunities for labs to actually assist with making the grid

0:36:27.800 --> 0:36:31.240
<v Speaker 14>more resilient and actually increasing the grid capacity by virtue

0:36:31.280 --> 0:36:34.480
<v Speaker 14>of doing training runs, for example, at low hours of

0:36:34.600 --> 0:36:35.840
<v Speaker 14>typical power usage.

0:36:36.040 --> 0:36:38.839
<v Speaker 2>Kevin Fraser from the Cato Institute, thanks for joining us

0:36:39.000 --> 0:36:41.640
<v Speaker 2>on a bloom Thank you at tech well coming out

0:36:41.680 --> 0:36:44.719
<v Speaker 2>four NASA astronauts are expected to board a space capsule

0:36:44.800 --> 0:36:48.759
<v Speaker 2>and blast off two the Moon later today. We're gonna

0:36:48.760 --> 0:36:51.520
<v Speaker 2>get the latest on Artemis two. That's next. This is

0:36:51.520 --> 0:37:07.640
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Tech. It's launch day for Artemis too. NASA's plan

0:37:07.719 --> 0:37:09.920
<v Speaker 2>return to the Moon's vicinity for the first time in

0:37:10.000 --> 0:37:12.840
<v Speaker 2>fifteen years. Let's get over to our own ed Ludlow,

0:37:13.239 --> 0:37:15.239
<v Speaker 2>who has traded the West coast for the East coast

0:37:15.280 --> 0:37:18.439
<v Speaker 2>of Florida. He's live at Kennedy Space Center. And why

0:37:18.520 --> 0:37:20.879
<v Speaker 2>is this such a critical moment or a critical test

0:37:20.920 --> 0:37:22.480
<v Speaker 2>for NASA's SLS.

0:37:22.719 --> 0:37:25.279
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, it's a dress rehearsal for the systems, right, the

0:37:25.360 --> 0:37:29.800
<v Speaker 11>sl LS rocket system developed by Boeing, the Orion spacecraft

0:37:30.160 --> 0:37:33.520
<v Speaker 11>developed by Lockheed Martin. It's only launched once before, in

0:37:33.560 --> 0:37:37.080
<v Speaker 11>twenty twenty two, and you know, is never launched with

0:37:37.200 --> 0:37:40.439
<v Speaker 11>humans on board. It is a project that is over

0:37:40.520 --> 0:37:44.280
<v Speaker 11>budget and behind schedule. But if we go today within

0:37:44.320 --> 0:37:46.640
<v Speaker 11>the two hour windows starting at six twenty four pm

0:37:46.760 --> 0:37:50.040
<v Speaker 11>Eastern time, it is the first time not only that

0:37:50.360 --> 0:37:52.520
<v Speaker 11>America and NASA and the world has tried to put

0:37:52.600 --> 0:37:56.160
<v Speaker 11>humans back towards the Moon, but it's very deep into space.

0:37:56.640 --> 0:37:58.760
<v Speaker 11>You know, it's a six hundred and eighty five thousand

0:37:58.760 --> 0:38:02.520
<v Speaker 11>mile round trip hundred and fifty thousand miles plus from

0:38:02.520 --> 0:38:06.160
<v Speaker 11>Earth that will take the crew over that ten day

0:38:06.200 --> 0:38:09.239
<v Speaker 11>period just four thousand miles off the Moon's surface. And

0:38:09.280 --> 0:38:11.600
<v Speaker 11>I bring that up because that's the ultimate goal as

0:38:11.640 --> 0:38:14.400
<v Speaker 11>early as twenty twenty eight, the next stages of the

0:38:14.480 --> 0:38:16.399
<v Speaker 11>Artemis program to land back on the Moon.

0:38:16.600 --> 0:38:18.840
<v Speaker 2>You know, when this was the space race was happening

0:38:18.880 --> 0:38:21.480
<v Speaker 2>in the nineteen sixties. It was all about the USSR

0:38:22.040 --> 0:38:26.920
<v Speaker 2>versus the United States, and now is the geopolitical context

0:38:27.000 --> 0:38:31.000
<v Speaker 2>at the time. Now it's different. Now the superpower is China.

0:38:31.640 --> 0:38:32.920
<v Speaker 2>What are China's ambitions?

0:38:33.960 --> 0:38:36.960
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, very simply. China has stated its ambitions to get

0:38:36.960 --> 0:38:40.640
<v Speaker 11>to the Moon by twenty thirty, and NASA has accelerated

0:38:40.680 --> 0:38:44.640
<v Speaker 11>its plans, in part under the new leadership of administrative Jarediseman,

0:38:44.920 --> 0:38:47.920
<v Speaker 11>to do as early as twenty twenty eight to establish

0:38:48.200 --> 0:38:51.040
<v Speaker 11>a base on the Moon, a thirty billion dollar commitment

0:38:51.160 --> 0:38:54.719
<v Speaker 11>over a decade from this current NASA administration. That is

0:38:54.760 --> 0:38:56.839
<v Speaker 11>the current space race that we are in.

0:38:57.840 --> 0:39:00.000
<v Speaker 2>Ed and I spoke just a few minutes ago, you

0:39:00.280 --> 0:39:03.960
<v Speaker 2>and Bailey help with this piece exclusive Bloomberg. SpaceX said

0:39:04.000 --> 0:39:08.279
<v Speaker 2>to file confidentially for an IPO before AI rivals. Why

0:39:08.280 --> 0:39:11.560
<v Speaker 2>are we talking about the SLS when you know SpaceX

0:39:11.640 --> 0:39:14.400
<v Speaker 2>in a few years could do this. Could that displace

0:39:14.920 --> 0:39:17.120
<v Speaker 2>the SLS at some point.

0:39:17.160 --> 0:39:20.439
<v Speaker 11>SLS has had a lot of issues, principally with hydrogen leaks.

0:39:20.520 --> 0:39:23.839
<v Speaker 11>Hydrogen is the fuel with oxygen as the oxidizer, and

0:39:24.080 --> 0:39:26.920
<v Speaker 11>if the system goes tonight, it will be the most

0:39:26.960 --> 0:39:30.919
<v Speaker 11>powerful human rated system to launch eight point eight million

0:39:31.000 --> 0:39:35.719
<v Speaker 11>pounds of thrust at liftoff. Now Starship, the system that

0:39:35.760 --> 0:39:38.520
<v Speaker 11>SpaceX is working on is almost double that in terms

0:39:38.520 --> 0:39:41.040
<v Speaker 11>of power, but it has never completed a mission end

0:39:41.080 --> 0:39:44.279
<v Speaker 11>to end and has not yet done human spaceflight. But

0:39:44.320 --> 0:39:48.120
<v Speaker 11>as we've reported at Bloomberg, there is a proposal on

0:39:48.160 --> 0:39:51.840
<v Speaker 11>the table from SpaceX for a variant of the existing

0:39:51.920 --> 0:39:55.960
<v Speaker 11>Artemis plan where sles we carry O Ryan into lower orbit.

0:39:56.480 --> 0:40:00.600
<v Speaker 11>In lower orbit oryan wo dock was Starship and Starship

0:40:00.680 --> 0:40:03.680
<v Speaker 11>under this proposal that Nastaro's green lit but is not final,

0:40:04.080 --> 0:40:09.000
<v Speaker 11>would push O'Ryan to lunar low lunar orbit and go

0:40:09.040 --> 0:40:11.919
<v Speaker 11>from there. There's also a lander proposal from SpaceX as well,

0:40:12.000 --> 0:40:14.000
<v Speaker 11>so they're in the hunt for this. But the IPO

0:40:14.360 --> 0:40:17.880
<v Speaker 11>and the confidential filing we reported earlier be under no.

0:40:20.320 --> 0:40:23.280
<v Speaker 11>You know, the straight matter of it is SpaceX raising

0:40:23.320 --> 0:40:27.240
<v Speaker 11>capital to fund data centers in space. Completely separate story.

0:40:27.320 --> 0:40:31.160
<v Speaker 2>Okay, just thirty seconds left on this and obviously I'm

0:40:31.160 --> 0:40:34.000
<v Speaker 2>going to Mars and that's the question that we want

0:40:34.040 --> 0:40:37.080
<v Speaker 2>answered here. How does a successful flight tonight set up

0:40:37.200 --> 0:40:39.360
<v Speaker 2>a future human potentially on Mars.

0:40:39.880 --> 0:40:42.320
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, again, this is a dress rehearsal for the systems,

0:40:42.680 --> 0:40:44.880
<v Speaker 11>with the goal in the near term of getting humans

0:40:44.920 --> 0:40:47.320
<v Speaker 11>back onto the moons surface twenty twenty eight establish a

0:40:47.360 --> 0:40:50.520
<v Speaker 11>base on the Moon's surface, with the academic argument that

0:40:50.600 --> 0:40:55.040
<v Speaker 11>deploying resources literally launch capability or refuel from the Moon

0:40:55.120 --> 0:40:58.160
<v Speaker 11>to get to Mars in the future is one interesting

0:40:58.239 --> 0:41:01.759
<v Speaker 11>avenue and those are the goals. Near a term, it's

0:41:01.800 --> 0:41:03.960
<v Speaker 11>the Moon, But longer term there is still a commitment

0:41:04.040 --> 0:41:07.800
<v Speaker 11>from this NASA administration and this country to getting humans

0:41:07.800 --> 0:41:10.960
<v Speaker 11>to Mars. And again, SpaceX retains that ambition of making

0:41:11.239 --> 0:41:14.440
<v Speaker 11>humans a multiplanetry species with the end goal being Mars.

0:41:14.840 --> 0:41:19.120
<v Speaker 2>All right for now, Ed's at Kennedy Space Center, Cape Canaveral, Florida,

0:41:19.160 --> 0:41:20.680
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg's Ed Ludlow Live.

0:41:20.800 --> 0:41:21.040
<v Speaker 3>There.

0:41:21.360 --> 0:41:24.120
<v Speaker 2>Stick around with Ed right here on Bloomberg as we

0:41:24.160 --> 0:41:27.160
<v Speaker 2>follow the launch live that's at six pm Wall Street

0:41:27.200 --> 0:41:30.920
<v Speaker 2>time tonight. Well, speaking of Elon Musk, he wants Tesla's

0:41:30.920 --> 0:41:33.400
<v Speaker 2>future to be all about AI, but at present, the

0:41:33.400 --> 0:41:36.560
<v Speaker 2>eb maker still needs to sell cars. The company releases

0:41:36.560 --> 0:41:39.399
<v Speaker 2>its sales figures tomorrow and analysts are expecting the last

0:41:39.480 --> 0:41:42.480
<v Speaker 2>quarter to be a bit of a sluggish one. Bloomberg's

0:41:42.480 --> 0:41:45.680
<v Speaker 2>Autos reporter Craig Trudell has the details. Greg, I thought

0:41:45.680 --> 0:41:48.680
<v Speaker 2>analyst said that, you know, the stock price of Tesla

0:41:48.800 --> 0:41:52.719
<v Speaker 2>is completely divorced from autos right now. Why is this

0:41:52.760 --> 0:41:54.320
<v Speaker 2>still such a closely looked at figure.

0:41:55.800 --> 0:41:59.040
<v Speaker 15>Yeah, I think it's still a debate one that maybe

0:41:59.320 --> 0:42:01.680
<v Speaker 15>looks like it was settled months ago when you saw

0:42:02.320 --> 0:42:05.239
<v Speaker 15>you know, the auto business for Tesla just really uh,

0:42:05.440 --> 0:42:08.920
<v Speaker 15>you know, show show signs you know, of deteriorating. I

0:42:08.920 --> 0:42:11.840
<v Speaker 15>think especially early last year, right where you know, we

0:42:12.160 --> 0:42:14.919
<v Speaker 15>saw the shares of this company get off to such

0:42:14.960 --> 0:42:18.440
<v Speaker 15>an awful start, and yet even as we didn't necessarily

0:42:18.520 --> 0:42:21.840
<v Speaker 15>see a major improvement in car sales, we saw the

0:42:22.239 --> 0:42:25.120
<v Speaker 15>shares come back because Musk was sort of pushing this

0:42:25.239 --> 0:42:29.360
<v Speaker 15>narrative of AI and robots. We're now seeing the shares

0:42:29.840 --> 0:42:32.520
<v Speaker 15>have a hard time just early this year, in part

0:42:32.560 --> 0:42:34.640
<v Speaker 15>because of the fact that that this is you know,

0:42:34.760 --> 0:42:37.000
<v Speaker 15>still not a settled issue, and this is still a

0:42:37.000 --> 0:42:39.600
<v Speaker 15>company that, after all, makes so much of its money

0:42:39.880 --> 0:42:43.000
<v Speaker 15>building and selling cars and and is still very much

0:42:43.000 --> 0:42:45.719
<v Speaker 15>at the early stage, the sort of prototype stage of

0:42:45.760 --> 0:42:48.840
<v Speaker 15>making things like the humanoid robot to optimists that everyone's

0:42:48.840 --> 0:42:51.439
<v Speaker 15>excited about, but it's really hard to value at this junk.

0:42:51.600 --> 0:42:53.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, perhaps that's a really good segue to talk about

0:42:53.760 --> 0:42:58.719
<v Speaker 2>this report, this exclusive from Ed and Bailey about SpaceX

0:42:58.719 --> 0:43:01.680
<v Speaker 2>centifile content contently for that IPO. Just in the last

0:43:01.680 --> 0:43:04.759
<v Speaker 2>thirty seconds that we have with you, how are analysts

0:43:04.760 --> 0:43:09.080
<v Speaker 2>talking about Tesla potentially becoming part of SpaceX after this

0:43:09.120 --> 0:43:10.600
<v Speaker 2>becomes a private a public company.

0:43:11.960 --> 0:43:14.960
<v Speaker 15>I think it's a really fascinating question. I think you know,

0:43:15.040 --> 0:43:18.279
<v Speaker 15>this is all for me coming from a perspective of

0:43:18.400 --> 0:43:21.600
<v Speaker 15>Tesla and SpaceX. For all the success they've had, they've

0:43:21.640 --> 0:43:25.279
<v Speaker 15>not been the sort of money spinners that a Alphabet

0:43:25.880 --> 0:43:29.560
<v Speaker 15>or a Facebook are, right, and Musk has such outsize

0:43:29.600 --> 0:43:33.280
<v Speaker 15>ambitions to play with the big boys in terms of AI.

0:43:34.040 --> 0:43:36.680
<v Speaker 15>Does he need to combine these companies in order for

0:43:36.760 --> 0:43:40.120
<v Speaker 15>them to help raise more money and fund this AI

0:43:40.200 --> 0:43:40.680
<v Speaker 15>race and.

0:43:40.640 --> 0:43:43.600
<v Speaker 2>Maybe of course get that big payday in the next

0:43:43.640 --> 0:43:46.440
<v Speaker 2>few years. That Bloomberg is Craig Trudell live from London,

0:43:46.480 --> 0:43:47.680
<v Speaker 2>that is going to do it for this addition of

0:43:47.719 --> 0:43:49.960
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Tech, don't forget to check out our podcast, find

0:43:50.000 --> 0:43:53.680
<v Speaker 2>another terminal, Apple, Spotify than iHeart this is Bloomberg