WEBVTT - Cowboys Break: Offense vs. Defense

0:00:04.160 --> 0:00:06.680
<v Speaker 1>The following. Here's a production of Dallas Cowboys dot Com

0:00:06.680 --> 0:00:17.040
<v Speaker 1>and the Dallas Cowboys Football Club. Cowboys, Let's go. Are

0:00:17.040 --> 0:00:19.920
<v Speaker 1>you ready for a break? Yes? Are you ready for

0:00:19.960 --> 0:00:25.040
<v Speaker 1>a break? Absolutely? Ready for a break? Yeah, and so

0:00:25.160 --> 0:00:28.920
<v Speaker 1>much for that. It's time for The Break on Dallas

0:00:28.960 --> 0:00:35.040
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys dot Com with Nick Eatman, David Hellman, and bar

0:00:35.120 --> 0:00:42.040
<v Speaker 1>Garcia and Derek Eagleton. It is Monday, December sixth, twenty

0:00:42.280 --> 0:00:46.120
<v Speaker 1>twenty one, Season seventeen, episode number seventy two. Welcome to

0:00:46.200 --> 0:00:48.199
<v Speaker 1>the latest edition of The Break. We are live from

0:00:48.200 --> 0:00:51.479
<v Speaker 1>that WBC Morgat studios at the Star, coming off a

0:00:51.520 --> 0:00:53.320
<v Speaker 1>little bit of a weekend here where we didn't have

0:00:53.360 --> 0:00:55.560
<v Speaker 1>a football we had to cover, got to watch a

0:00:55.560 --> 0:00:57.320
<v Speaker 1>little football. So we got a lot of talk to

0:00:57.600 --> 0:01:00.200
<v Speaker 1>do today about this team. We're gonna actually take this

0:01:00.280 --> 0:01:02.680
<v Speaker 1>data to count today. Innimi actually to take a lot

0:01:02.680 --> 0:01:05.600
<v Speaker 1>of questions. I have some questions lined up for this

0:01:05.640 --> 0:01:08.000
<v Speaker 1>group that we'll talk about. We'll take some questions from

0:01:08.040 --> 0:01:10.119
<v Speaker 1>you guys. I know you've already been sending them on Twitter.

0:01:10.360 --> 0:01:13.120
<v Speaker 1>I've got lots of questions there, and you guys can

0:01:13.160 --> 0:01:15.080
<v Speaker 1>also call us the numbers eight eight eight eight five

0:01:15.200 --> 0:01:19.039
<v Speaker 1>five two two nine seven again eight eight eight eight

0:01:19.120 --> 0:01:22.240
<v Speaker 1>five five two two nine seven. You should take advantage

0:01:22.240 --> 0:01:24.160
<v Speaker 1>of this. It's not very often that we allow you

0:01:24.160 --> 0:01:26.720
<v Speaker 1>guys to send us questions and we actually get to them.

0:01:26.720 --> 0:01:29.920
<v Speaker 1>So take advantage there it is. Yeah, there's got You

0:01:30.000 --> 0:01:32.400
<v Speaker 1>got two days of this, so make sure you take

0:01:32.400 --> 0:01:34.279
<v Speaker 1>advantage of it. We'll try to answer as many questions

0:01:34.280 --> 0:01:37.240
<v Speaker 1>as we can over these next couple shows. Uh, Nick,

0:01:37.280 --> 0:01:39.360
<v Speaker 1>give me a seventy two. I was gonna give you

0:01:39.400 --> 0:01:43.199
<v Speaker 1>the translation of what that really meant, that we're taking calls.

0:01:43.200 --> 0:01:45.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I didn't really feel like doing a rundown.

0:01:45.280 --> 0:01:47.319
<v Speaker 1>Not true, because I got a list of questions here

0:01:47.319 --> 0:01:49.320
<v Speaker 1>that I got. There's only one seventy two. It's two,

0:01:49.320 --> 0:01:51.960
<v Speaker 1>it's all Jones. Is there only one to No, there's

0:01:51.960 --> 0:01:54.320
<v Speaker 1>probably Travis Frederick. I think we're seventy two. Maybe in

0:01:54.400 --> 0:01:57.480
<v Speaker 1>Travis will take offense to that. He did good, all right,

0:01:59.000 --> 0:02:00.880
<v Speaker 1>he took offense to a lot of thing. That's good.

0:02:00.880 --> 0:02:03.280
<v Speaker 1>He's a great center, a great player. They need him,

0:02:03.400 --> 0:02:07.240
<v Speaker 1>they miss him. But Tutam Jones seventy seventy two, I

0:02:07.240 --> 0:02:09.679
<v Speaker 1>mean that he played for fifteen years. Let me ask

0:02:09.680 --> 0:02:11.639
<v Speaker 1>you a question, as a guy that covered a deep cover.

0:02:11.760 --> 0:02:15.240
<v Speaker 1>But you watched the Cowboys a long time? Was he

0:02:15.360 --> 0:02:17.520
<v Speaker 1>like for for an outside, I wasn't a Cowboys fan.

0:02:17.840 --> 0:02:21.120
<v Speaker 1>Was he ever as big as his persona? Because of

0:02:21.120 --> 0:02:23.960
<v Speaker 1>course as a as a non Cowboys fan, you hear

0:02:24.000 --> 0:02:26.959
<v Speaker 1>two Tall Jones, he's big. You know, you always thought, oh,

0:02:27.040 --> 0:02:30.120
<v Speaker 1>two Tall Jones, Was he ever that good? No? Now

0:02:30.200 --> 0:02:32.320
<v Speaker 1>I think I think if his name was Ed Jones,

0:02:32.480 --> 0:02:35.280
<v Speaker 1>I don't think he I do, And I thought the

0:02:35.320 --> 0:02:38.040
<v Speaker 1>same thing about me and Joe Green, and then no,

0:02:38.240 --> 0:02:43.519
<v Speaker 1>that's not that's not He was awesome. He was awesome. Joe. Yeah, yeah,

0:02:43.680 --> 0:02:45.679
<v Speaker 1>shout out to heck Ma Harrison, who's related to me

0:02:45.680 --> 0:02:48.840
<v Speaker 1>and Joe Green. Yeah, I'm sure people know that. Uh,

0:02:49.040 --> 0:02:50.840
<v Speaker 1>two Tall Jones. I think he was the other side

0:02:50.840 --> 0:02:53.200
<v Speaker 1>of Harvey Martin. Harvey Martin was better. He was tall,

0:02:53.440 --> 0:02:56.000
<v Speaker 1>sixty nine, it's tall. And he had a cool name. Yeah,

0:02:56.040 --> 0:02:57.519
<v Speaker 1>it's cool and all that. And I think he was

0:02:57.560 --> 0:02:59.720
<v Speaker 1>a really good player, many three Pro Bowls. But I

0:02:59.720 --> 0:03:01.840
<v Speaker 1>think you know his longevity he played and you know

0:03:01.880 --> 0:03:03.079
<v Speaker 1>it was number one pick. I don't know if he

0:03:03.160 --> 0:03:05.640
<v Speaker 1>ever lived up to that, But I don't know. I

0:03:05.680 --> 0:03:09.480
<v Speaker 1>mean seventy he's seventy two. Tristan Hill's also seventy two.

0:03:10.040 --> 0:03:13.160
<v Speaker 1>Let's go, let's get back. He's back, and oh yeah

0:03:13.200 --> 0:03:15.560
<v Speaker 1>he is. He's one of the guys. He left again

0:03:15.560 --> 0:03:17.720
<v Speaker 1>and he came back. A lot of stuff happened last week,

0:03:18.120 --> 0:03:20.600
<v Speaker 1>A lot of stuff. This too much stuff happening with

0:03:20.639 --> 0:03:23.360
<v Speaker 1>this team. I'm actually looking forward to this week. You

0:03:23.440 --> 0:03:27.760
<v Speaker 1>get hopefully, hopefully you got coaches all back, you got

0:03:27.760 --> 0:03:30.200
<v Speaker 1>players all back. I heard you say this morning on

0:03:30.240 --> 0:03:32.280
<v Speaker 1>the radio, Nick, this might be the healthiest they've been

0:03:32.360 --> 0:03:35.680
<v Speaker 1>all season. Injury if yes, if if there are no

0:03:35.720 --> 0:03:40.240
<v Speaker 1>more COVID cases, A big testing day. Although today tomorrow Wednesday, Right,

0:03:40.280 --> 0:03:44.000
<v Speaker 1>it's it's ten am, knocking on all the wood around me.

0:03:44.200 --> 0:03:48.240
<v Speaker 1>But I think if something ridiculous was gonna pop off,

0:03:48.280 --> 0:03:50.440
<v Speaker 1>it would probably be in the news cycle by now. Well,

0:03:50.440 --> 0:03:52.200
<v Speaker 1>but I'm not thinking about that so much. I'm thinking

0:03:52.240 --> 0:03:54.240
<v Speaker 1>about you know, guys get a weekend where they don't

0:03:54.240 --> 0:03:56.120
<v Speaker 1>have to play football. Oh for sure, they do a

0:03:56.160 --> 0:03:59.760
<v Speaker 1>little traveling, and you exposed somewhere you know still is

0:04:01.360 --> 0:04:03.400
<v Speaker 1>so it's so it's certainly that's that's the part you

0:04:03.440 --> 0:04:05.560
<v Speaker 1>gotta be worried about throughout the week. Come back this

0:04:05.720 --> 0:04:09.800
<v Speaker 1>next few weeks, just kick ass completely and then I'll

0:04:09.840 --> 0:04:12.640
<v Speaker 1>be like, Yep, never doubted them, not a single time.

0:04:14.200 --> 0:04:16.039
<v Speaker 1>At least you're self aware. I want to know if

0:04:16.080 --> 0:04:17.680
<v Speaker 1>you say the other way, if it goes the other way,

0:04:17.720 --> 0:04:20.000
<v Speaker 1>what are you saying? Because this is gonna get real interesting.

0:04:20.000 --> 0:04:24.159
<v Speaker 1>They got some division, start throwing names and who we're

0:04:24.160 --> 0:04:27.600
<v Speaker 1>gonna fire this year. I mean, if they keep win,

0:04:27.680 --> 0:04:29.760
<v Speaker 1>if they win, you know, reel off a few more wins,

0:04:29.800 --> 0:04:32.280
<v Speaker 1>then then the narrative is going to be, well, they

0:04:32.320 --> 0:04:35.320
<v Speaker 1>won't win the super Bowl because they can't win in AFC,

0:04:35.560 --> 0:04:38.920
<v Speaker 1>but but they can beat everybody else. Yeah, well, we'll

0:04:38.960 --> 0:04:41.040
<v Speaker 1>see what all happens. We're actually gonna save the talk

0:04:41.080 --> 0:04:43.840
<v Speaker 1>of the rest of the NFC till tomorrow. There was

0:04:43.880 --> 0:04:45.920
<v Speaker 1>some interesting things that happened this weekend. We'll get into

0:04:45.920 --> 0:04:48.480
<v Speaker 1>some of that tomorrow. But I wanted to hit some

0:04:48.560 --> 0:04:51.160
<v Speaker 1>bigger picture questions today, and I'm gonna start with some

0:04:51.279 --> 0:04:53.640
<v Speaker 1>questions I have you guys will get some questions from

0:04:53.920 --> 0:04:55.760
<v Speaker 1>our listeners here in a second. I want to start

0:04:55.800 --> 0:04:58.960
<v Speaker 1>with a true false question. The defense is the most

0:04:59.000 --> 0:05:04.920
<v Speaker 1>reliable unit on this team? True or false? True? True?

0:05:06.360 --> 0:05:09.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm more reliable right now are you making a thing

0:05:09.800 --> 0:05:11.800
<v Speaker 1>because I'm waiting. I'm waiting for day and I want

0:05:11.839 --> 0:05:13.040
<v Speaker 1>to see. I want to see. We're gonna get a

0:05:13.040 --> 0:05:19.559
<v Speaker 1>discussion here. False? False. I hate it's Monday. It's Monday

0:05:19.640 --> 0:05:27.520
<v Speaker 1>morning after why the most reliable? What's what's reliable mean?

0:05:27.680 --> 0:05:30.480
<v Speaker 1>Like reliable to not piss you off, Reliable to do

0:05:30.520 --> 0:05:32.719
<v Speaker 1>their job, Reliable to be who you thought they were.

0:05:33.040 --> 0:05:36.000
<v Speaker 1>That's okay, which, right, who did we think they were?

0:05:36.200 --> 0:05:39.080
<v Speaker 1>Exactly right, that's exactly what we thought they were. Grating

0:05:39.080 --> 0:05:40.840
<v Speaker 1>them on a curve right now? I think, yeah, we

0:05:40.839 --> 0:05:43.400
<v Speaker 1>have thirty six points two weeks ago, That's what I'm saying.

0:05:43.440 --> 0:05:47.600
<v Speaker 1>They had an awful day against Vegas, not that long ago,

0:05:47.720 --> 0:05:51.039
<v Speaker 1>ten days ago. Um reliable to me? I see it

0:05:51.040 --> 0:05:54.760
<v Speaker 1>as who has been like most consistent throughout the whole season,

0:05:55.240 --> 0:05:57.600
<v Speaker 1>been the team that you know kind of what you're

0:05:57.600 --> 0:06:01.120
<v Speaker 1>gonna get. They've been solid. They're all the best defense

0:06:01.200 --> 0:06:03.760
<v Speaker 1>in the NFL. But they given you enough for you

0:06:04.120 --> 0:06:06.160
<v Speaker 1>to have your offense do what they need to do.

0:06:06.240 --> 0:06:08.320
<v Speaker 1>Now is some of the offense who hasn't been able

0:06:08.360 --> 0:06:10.800
<v Speaker 1>to consistently give you what they need to give you. You

0:06:10.720 --> 0:06:13.560
<v Speaker 1>You know what you're absolutely like I'm thinking through this live.

0:06:13.720 --> 0:06:17.479
<v Speaker 1>This is where Rundown's come in handy. But now that

0:06:17.560 --> 0:06:20.159
<v Speaker 1>I say that, I think you're right. I think I

0:06:20.200 --> 0:06:23.480
<v Speaker 1>think you're right because really what they've played twelve games,

0:06:24.000 --> 0:06:28.000
<v Speaker 1>and the defense more often than not, probably in ten

0:06:28.040 --> 0:06:30.359
<v Speaker 1>of those twelve games, has done what they do, Like,

0:06:30.440 --> 0:06:34.400
<v Speaker 1>they pretty reliably get picks, They pretty reliably hold people

0:06:34.520 --> 0:06:38.440
<v Speaker 1>below twenty four points. Even some of the uglier losses

0:06:38.480 --> 0:06:41.280
<v Speaker 1>like Denver, it's not like the defense just got run

0:06:41.279 --> 0:06:43.560
<v Speaker 1>out of the building immediately. I mean they didn't play well,

0:06:43.960 --> 0:06:47.280
<v Speaker 1>but like Denver, they didn't get they didn't have a

0:06:47.320 --> 0:06:49.520
<v Speaker 1>three score lead until like midway through the third right

0:06:49.560 --> 0:06:51.760
<v Speaker 1>like it was sixteen nothing. They were forcing them to

0:06:51.800 --> 0:06:55.279
<v Speaker 1>kick field goals a little bit, whereas the offense is

0:06:55.360 --> 0:06:58.600
<v Speaker 1>kind of I mean, no showed at least three or

0:06:58.640 --> 0:07:01.960
<v Speaker 1>four times at this point, and recently that's it's all

0:07:01.960 --> 0:07:04.640
<v Speaker 1>about recency, right, And even remember recently and even in

0:07:04.680 --> 0:07:08.520
<v Speaker 1>the run of blowouts like the forty point games in September,

0:07:08.560 --> 0:07:11.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, the Carolina game, the Giants game, I mean,

0:07:11.520 --> 0:07:13.520
<v Speaker 1>the defense will scoring new points in that game in

0:07:13.560 --> 0:07:18.000
<v Speaker 1>those games as well, So yeah, I think true still

0:07:18.040 --> 0:07:21.960
<v Speaker 1>hold them false, Yeah, but I mean it just goes

0:07:22.000 --> 0:07:24.080
<v Speaker 1>to show this team can be really good. This could

0:07:24.080 --> 0:07:27.400
<v Speaker 1>be this could be a team that you know can win,

0:07:27.640 --> 0:07:29.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, can can get to the super Bowl. It

0:07:29.560 --> 0:07:32.760
<v Speaker 1>really can. Because if you're number one, if you got

0:07:32.760 --> 0:07:35.040
<v Speaker 1>the number one offense in the NFL, and we're saying

0:07:35.080 --> 0:07:38.200
<v Speaker 1>that the defense is more reliable, I think so I

0:07:38.240 --> 0:07:40.480
<v Speaker 1>think they're still number one. They're I mean they're still

0:07:40.560 --> 0:07:42.120
<v Speaker 1>up at the top of the list, and I mean

0:07:42.320 --> 0:07:45.520
<v Speaker 1>they're right there, and you know that that just goes

0:07:45.560 --> 0:07:46.800
<v Speaker 1>to show. And I think a lot of it comes

0:07:46.840 --> 0:07:49.080
<v Speaker 1>down to expectations. I mean we look at what we're

0:07:49.080 --> 0:07:52.160
<v Speaker 1>expecting them to be and but I mean, you guys

0:07:52.200 --> 0:07:54.160
<v Speaker 1>are right. I mean the defense has been I mean

0:07:54.640 --> 0:07:57.040
<v Speaker 1>they get picked, they could, they could turnovers that they

0:07:57.080 --> 0:07:59.760
<v Speaker 1>give opportunities for the offense, and the game that they've lost,

0:07:59.800 --> 0:08:02.480
<v Speaker 1>the offense really didn't show out. So I think the

0:08:02.520 --> 0:08:05.280
<v Speaker 1>answer is right is the answer is, yes, the defense

0:08:06.040 --> 0:08:09.720
<v Speaker 1>is more reliable. The offense on their best day is

0:08:09.760 --> 0:08:12.240
<v Speaker 1>better than the defense on its best day. Yes, but

0:08:12.240 --> 0:08:15.040
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't always happen. And let's not confuse with them

0:08:15.080 --> 0:08:17.400
<v Speaker 1>with a team that is going to get carried where

0:08:17.440 --> 0:08:20.400
<v Speaker 1>they want to go by right they're not, but but

0:08:20.440 --> 0:08:24.760
<v Speaker 1>they they've they've surpassed any expectation you could ever say.

0:08:24.840 --> 0:08:30.360
<v Speaker 1>And Michael Parsons just, I mean, he's he's just an animal.

0:08:30.520 --> 0:08:33.640
<v Speaker 1>And let's let's remember, let's remember they still have not

0:08:33.800 --> 0:08:37.560
<v Speaker 1>played with their full compliment of parts, and and hopefully

0:08:37.640 --> 0:08:39.800
<v Speaker 1>that comes this weekend, but they still haven't done that,

0:08:39.840 --> 0:08:42.240
<v Speaker 1>and so to be playing as well as they are,

0:08:42.280 --> 0:08:44.640
<v Speaker 1>again not perfect, but playing as well as they are

0:08:45.000 --> 0:08:47.800
<v Speaker 1>with kind of having having to mix guys and figure

0:08:47.840 --> 0:08:50.840
<v Speaker 1>out places for guys. You give them all their players

0:08:51.040 --> 0:08:53.160
<v Speaker 1>at one time. Let's see how far they can go.

0:08:53.240 --> 0:08:56.120
<v Speaker 1>Maybe they do become a defense that's even more reliable

0:08:56.280 --> 0:08:58.640
<v Speaker 1>than what we've seen so far. True. Their seventh and

0:08:58.720 --> 0:09:01.960
<v Speaker 1>offensive efficiency right now, which is they were up in

0:09:01.960 --> 0:09:04.160
<v Speaker 1>the top three before. But still explaining to people would

0:09:04.160 --> 0:09:09.120
<v Speaker 1>offensive efficient just football outsiders DVOA. It's basically again explained

0:09:09.160 --> 0:09:11.040
<v Speaker 1>to people what that is. I know, I know what

0:09:11.080 --> 0:09:13.880
<v Speaker 1>you're talking about, but I get into analytics. Everybody doesn't.

0:09:14.000 --> 0:09:17.000
<v Speaker 1>It's explain DVOA is just a weighted term where they

0:09:17.400 --> 0:09:20.560
<v Speaker 1>literally compare the success of every play that you run

0:09:20.600 --> 0:09:23.600
<v Speaker 1>in a season up against the league standard and see

0:09:23.640 --> 0:09:26.280
<v Speaker 1>how you fare. So like every time you're snapping the ball,

0:09:26.640 --> 0:09:29.280
<v Speaker 1>how well do you do and it's there's no such

0:09:29.280 --> 0:09:31.559
<v Speaker 1>thing as a perfect stat but it's just a reliable

0:09:31.600 --> 0:09:33.920
<v Speaker 1>metric for how not only how well you move the ball,

0:09:33.960 --> 0:09:36.520
<v Speaker 1>but how reliably you do it. There you go perfect.

0:09:36.640 --> 0:09:39.160
<v Speaker 1>All right, Let's move on to the next question. Michael

0:09:39.200 --> 0:09:42.480
<v Speaker 1>Parsons is again true or false Michael Parsons should be

0:09:43.280 --> 0:09:46.520
<v Speaker 1>defensive player of the year, should be or will be?

0:09:46.720 --> 0:09:51.439
<v Speaker 1>Should be? Actually, yeah, I don't know the best player.

0:09:51.480 --> 0:09:53.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't think he's not defensive player in the league.

0:09:53.200 --> 0:09:54.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't think I don't think he's the best defensive

0:09:54.960 --> 0:09:58.240
<v Speaker 1>player in the league. I'm sorry, I can't go there,

0:09:58.360 --> 0:10:00.240
<v Speaker 1>and maybe that's just me being stuff right, No, I

0:10:00.280 --> 0:10:02.920
<v Speaker 1>really which you can do? Now? Now, I'll say this

0:10:03.400 --> 0:10:06.600
<v Speaker 1>inside linebacker. I don't watch them all, but like I

0:10:06.640 --> 0:10:08.760
<v Speaker 1>think I think he could be all pro I do

0:10:08.920 --> 0:10:11.600
<v Speaker 1>I think he could be an all pro inside linebacker.

0:10:12.400 --> 0:10:17.360
<v Speaker 1>I think Miles Garrett, though, is pretty damn good over there. Absolutely,

0:10:17.360 --> 0:10:18.840
<v Speaker 1>when you start talking about defensive player of the the year,

0:10:18.880 --> 0:10:20.760
<v Speaker 1>offensive player of the year, all of them are going

0:10:20.800 --> 0:10:23.319
<v Speaker 1>to be really, really good. I guess what I get

0:10:23.360 --> 0:10:25.920
<v Speaker 1>back to is everything that he's done this year. Yeah,

0:10:26.640 --> 0:10:28.800
<v Speaker 1>I think that you can't just say he's just a

0:10:28.880 --> 0:10:31.400
<v Speaker 1>pass rusher. He's a lot more than that. So when

0:10:31.400 --> 0:10:34.360
<v Speaker 1>you factor it all in, should he be defensive Player

0:10:34.400 --> 0:10:37.800
<v Speaker 1>of the Year, I would I prefer to answer it

0:10:37.840 --> 0:10:40.920
<v Speaker 1>this way, and I don't think he will be because

0:10:40.920 --> 0:10:43.040
<v Speaker 1>there's too many things the question, there's too many things

0:10:43.080 --> 0:10:45.880
<v Speaker 1>working against him. He's got a teammate. If here's your

0:10:46.240 --> 0:10:49.560
<v Speaker 1>defensive Player of the Year, vote, who are you voting? Yeah,

0:10:49.600 --> 0:10:55.199
<v Speaker 1>that's what That's what I know. Actually, can only mark

0:10:55.520 --> 0:10:57.720
<v Speaker 1>I take the easy way out. I take the easy

0:10:57.720 --> 0:10:59.800
<v Speaker 1>way mark both and get it wrong. No, I give

0:10:59.800 --> 0:11:02.800
<v Speaker 1>it to I'd have to go. Look, I either give

0:11:02.800 --> 0:11:04.800
<v Speaker 1>it to t J. Water, Miles Garrett, and I give

0:11:04.880 --> 0:11:07.120
<v Speaker 1>Mike a defensive Rookie of the year. It's just And

0:11:07.120 --> 0:11:09.040
<v Speaker 1>that's that's why I say. That's what voters are gonna

0:11:09.040 --> 0:11:11.880
<v Speaker 1>do too, what they do. But they're gonna say, we

0:11:11.920 --> 0:11:14.679
<v Speaker 1>don't want you win, and you here though, and still

0:11:14.720 --> 0:11:16.400
<v Speaker 1>give you your props. Yeah, and I don't think the

0:11:16.480 --> 0:11:19.160
<v Speaker 1>likelihood is that he will win. I'm the question really

0:11:19.200 --> 0:11:21.920
<v Speaker 1>is should he Is he in that category of player

0:11:22.240 --> 0:11:25.360
<v Speaker 1>where he should hear? Basically, I think serious content. I

0:11:25.400 --> 0:11:29.320
<v Speaker 1>think I can speak for Nick here is that he's

0:11:29.360 --> 0:11:32.760
<v Speaker 1>got a case. But you just feel weird saying it.

0:11:32.840 --> 0:11:34.800
<v Speaker 1>You're just like, so he's Lawrence Taylor because he's the

0:11:34.840 --> 0:11:36.520
<v Speaker 1>only other rookie to do it. Yeah, you want to

0:11:36.520 --> 0:11:38.920
<v Speaker 1>put him in that category. Maybe you should, but maybe

0:11:38.960 --> 0:11:42.560
<v Speaker 1>you do. You want to be the one that does it. Okay,

0:11:42.600 --> 0:11:45.200
<v Speaker 1>if you're okay with that, that's fine. But those of

0:11:45.320 --> 0:11:47.520
<v Speaker 1>us who grew the true false game for a second,

0:11:47.559 --> 0:11:51.199
<v Speaker 1>all right, say what you want to say. No, say

0:11:51.280 --> 0:11:52.800
<v Speaker 1>what you want you want to say it. Well, I

0:11:52.880 --> 0:11:55.360
<v Speaker 1>made the case last week. I said I cannot think

0:11:55.360 --> 0:11:57.960
<v Speaker 1>of it. And I've been asking people, everybody I learnt

0:11:57.960 --> 0:11:59.959
<v Speaker 1>across that we start talking about the Cowboys. I've asked

0:12:00.040 --> 0:12:02.960
<v Speaker 1>from all the same question. Name a defensive player in

0:12:02.960 --> 0:12:04.800
<v Speaker 1>the history of the NFL that's done all the things

0:12:04.800 --> 0:12:06.520
<v Speaker 1>that this guy has done in his rookie year. I

0:12:06.559 --> 0:12:08.920
<v Speaker 1>can't find one. I honestly can't find one. Get a

0:12:08.920 --> 0:12:12.160
<v Speaker 1>pick he needs, he needs a pick, he needs to

0:12:12.240 --> 0:12:15.080
<v Speaker 1>hit for the cycle. Last week I was sitting on

0:12:15.160 --> 0:12:19.160
<v Speaker 1>my desk and you, Derek, you were talking to Nick

0:12:19.880 --> 0:12:22.920
<v Speaker 1>about Mica and you were like so excited you your

0:12:23.000 --> 0:12:26.120
<v Speaker 1>voice hit like a high pitch and like, you know,

0:12:26.160 --> 0:12:29.360
<v Speaker 1>when a teenager is going through that transition, a kid

0:12:29.480 --> 0:12:33.959
<v Speaker 1>is transitioned. And I'm like, dang, I guess Derek is

0:12:34.000 --> 0:12:37.080
<v Speaker 1>really excited when I get when I get passed, when

0:12:37.120 --> 0:12:39.720
<v Speaker 1>I get real, I get real excited and I start

0:12:39.800 --> 0:12:42.800
<v Speaker 1>talking fast and high voice goes up everything. But I

0:12:42.840 --> 0:12:45.080
<v Speaker 1>think this guy's that good. He really is that good,

0:12:45.320 --> 0:12:48.280
<v Speaker 1>and I can't I can't find anybody to give me

0:12:48.760 --> 0:12:50.760
<v Speaker 1>rationale for why he isn't as good as I think

0:12:50.760 --> 0:12:53.199
<v Speaker 1>he is. Look, I'm okay with the idea if somebody

0:12:53.200 --> 0:12:54.640
<v Speaker 1>can give me that rational I haven't be able to

0:12:54.640 --> 0:12:56.920
<v Speaker 1>find it, right, Like everybody that I talked to there,

0:12:56.960 --> 0:12:59.880
<v Speaker 1>like here's a question I can't really answer, and so

0:13:00.760 --> 0:13:03.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm left to think that he may be the best.

0:13:04.000 --> 0:13:07.439
<v Speaker 1>So I don't know. Two guys that Dave just mentioned

0:13:07.480 --> 0:13:11.560
<v Speaker 1>are guys on teams that are probably out of the

0:13:11.600 --> 0:13:14.200
<v Speaker 1>playoff race or fighting for it right now, you know,

0:13:14.280 --> 0:13:17.720
<v Speaker 1>and so wild cards. So you you you think, all right, well,

0:13:17.760 --> 0:13:21.080
<v Speaker 1>who who is the top team? Like Who's and the

0:13:21.160 --> 0:13:24.600
<v Speaker 1>Patriots are actually the top team in the AFC, which

0:13:24.840 --> 0:13:28.320
<v Speaker 1>very quietly have a corner who's having a Diggs like season.

0:13:28.400 --> 0:13:30.680
<v Speaker 1>By the way, that's true, that guy is J. C. Jackson.

0:13:31.160 --> 0:13:32.640
<v Speaker 1>What does he have like one let one or two

0:13:32.720 --> 0:13:35.760
<v Speaker 1>less than I think? But they haven't played tonight, so

0:13:36.120 --> 0:13:38.560
<v Speaker 1>you could know you could get there and then on

0:13:38.600 --> 0:13:41.080
<v Speaker 1>the NFC, I mean, the Cardinals have the number one

0:13:41.120 --> 0:13:44.439
<v Speaker 1>seed right thinks currently, so we have two lost. I

0:13:44.480 --> 0:13:47.720
<v Speaker 1>don't know who the baker I mean, I don't know.

0:13:47.760 --> 0:13:50.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean who's carrying those teams, That's what I'm saying.

0:13:50.320 --> 0:13:53.120
<v Speaker 1>So you know, Cowboys are right up there. You can

0:13:53.200 --> 0:13:55.439
<v Speaker 1>you can make the case where I mean, five weeks ago,

0:13:55.480 --> 0:13:56.800
<v Speaker 1>if you would have, say the Cowboys would have a

0:13:56.840 --> 0:13:58.840
<v Speaker 1>contender for the Defensive Player of the Year, we'd be like,

0:13:59.120 --> 0:14:02.040
<v Speaker 1>well Diggs must have ten eleven you think, you know,

0:14:02.360 --> 0:14:04.559
<v Speaker 1>but he's he's not. I mean, I think people can

0:14:04.559 --> 0:14:07.840
<v Speaker 1>see not see through digs, but they see that he's

0:14:07.880 --> 0:14:10.240
<v Speaker 1>got some issues too. He makes picks. I'm not gonna

0:14:10.240 --> 0:14:12.000
<v Speaker 1>sit here and call him Chris Carter. I'm not gonna

0:14:12.040 --> 0:14:13.640
<v Speaker 1>sit there there. All he does catch you know, he

0:14:13.640 --> 0:14:16.400
<v Speaker 1>does get picks, like because that's pretty good. Yeah, but

0:14:16.440 --> 0:14:19.400
<v Speaker 1>like he he's got some some things in his game

0:14:19.480 --> 0:14:22.440
<v Speaker 1>that you can see why he was maybe you know

0:14:22.800 --> 0:14:24.640
<v Speaker 1>he filled in the second round, but you can also

0:14:24.680 --> 0:14:26.840
<v Speaker 1>see why he had first round grades because he can

0:14:26.880 --> 0:14:29.520
<v Speaker 1>make plays. Yeah, I'll just put it this way. I

0:14:29.560 --> 0:14:32.760
<v Speaker 1>think we actually answered a mail bag question about this

0:14:32.800 --> 0:14:35.800
<v Speaker 1>today and what I said was, I don't think he'll

0:14:35.800 --> 0:14:38.560
<v Speaker 1>win it, but I don't I no longer think that

0:14:38.560 --> 0:14:42.040
<v Speaker 1>that's a crazy thing to say. Well, he absolutely deserves

0:14:42.040 --> 0:14:44.760
<v Speaker 1>to be in that conversation. His versatility is amazing. I

0:14:44.840 --> 0:14:48.560
<v Speaker 1>just think the precedent is what's going to turn people off.

0:14:48.600 --> 0:14:50.400
<v Speaker 1>They're like, are we really We're gonna put this guy

0:14:50.400 --> 0:14:52.560
<v Speaker 1>in a conversation with Lawrence Taylor? And then you'd think

0:14:53.200 --> 0:14:55.200
<v Speaker 1>he's got Rookie of the Year locked up right now.

0:14:55.320 --> 0:14:58.160
<v Speaker 1>I can't. I'm sure there's somebody else having a decent season,

0:14:58.480 --> 0:15:01.600
<v Speaker 1>but between how amazing my is and the Cowboys past

0:15:01.680 --> 0:15:04.480
<v Speaker 1>star brand power, he's already got that one. So I

0:15:04.480 --> 0:15:07.360
<v Speaker 1>think people are gonna say Micah gets Rookie of the Year,

0:15:08.200 --> 0:15:10.880
<v Speaker 1>what Garrett whoever gets Player of the Year, and we

0:15:10.960 --> 0:15:12.760
<v Speaker 1>just we can just make it easy on herself. The

0:15:12.760 --> 0:15:15.800
<v Speaker 1>blame brought us for that, You know that, Dave, Dave.

0:15:15.840 --> 0:15:17.720
<v Speaker 1>I know it probably pisses you off that Dave does that,

0:15:17.920 --> 0:15:20.000
<v Speaker 1>and I think it stems from brought us because brought

0:15:20.040 --> 0:15:21.880
<v Speaker 1>Us didn't waste his time with stuff like that. He'd

0:15:21.880 --> 0:15:23.360
<v Speaker 1>be like, if it's not gonna happen, why I'm I

0:15:23.360 --> 0:15:25.600
<v Speaker 1>gonna say argue about it? Will tell me all the time.

0:15:25.720 --> 0:15:27.840
<v Speaker 1>So it's like, I'm not gonna talk about what I think. Yeah,

0:15:28.240 --> 0:15:29.960
<v Speaker 1>doesn't matter. What I think is a what's gonna happen,

0:15:30.000 --> 0:15:32.120
<v Speaker 1>which is which is fair too. It doesn't always make

0:15:32.160 --> 0:15:34.160
<v Speaker 1>for you know, you want to have this radio kind

0:15:34.160 --> 0:15:37.040
<v Speaker 1>of but that's like your opinion. I always offer my opinion.

0:15:37.120 --> 0:15:39.680
<v Speaker 1>I just want to qualify. Yeh. Can't you just see

0:15:39.720 --> 0:15:41.240
<v Speaker 1>brought Us sitting there at his feet up, like, what

0:15:41.680 --> 0:15:43.320
<v Speaker 1>are we talking about here? It's not gonna happen, and

0:15:43.360 --> 0:15:45.080
<v Speaker 1>I gonna go to rookie in Okay, I'll tell you.

0:15:45.400 --> 0:15:48.680
<v Speaker 1>I'll say this too though, especially this year, I was

0:15:48.680 --> 0:15:51.120
<v Speaker 1>thinking about this on the drive to work. Just there's

0:15:51.520 --> 0:15:54.120
<v Speaker 1>it feels like so much more season is left than

0:15:54.160 --> 0:15:56.600
<v Speaker 1>there usually is at this point in December, even though

0:15:56.600 --> 0:15:58.080
<v Speaker 1>it's just one more game in five game. I mean,

0:15:58.160 --> 0:16:00.320
<v Speaker 1>if if Mica keeps up this pace, what he's got,

0:16:00.360 --> 0:16:01.760
<v Speaker 1>I think it's five games in a row with a

0:16:01.800 --> 0:16:05.040
<v Speaker 1>sack or at least four or five. Yeah, okay, do

0:16:05.080 --> 0:16:07.960
<v Speaker 1>the math on that. I mean, sixteen sacks, maybe throwing

0:16:08.000 --> 0:16:11.960
<v Speaker 1>a forced fumble or an interception or defenses were talking

0:16:12.040 --> 0:16:15.200
<v Speaker 1>quarterback pressures. He's got everything because because you're talking about

0:16:15.240 --> 0:16:17.360
<v Speaker 1>breaking the record now ye yeah, Now the record for

0:16:17.440 --> 0:16:20.800
<v Speaker 1>rookie sacks is fourteen and a half and somebody actually

0:16:20.840 --> 0:16:22.840
<v Speaker 1>did this step remember we talked about it. I'm like, like,

0:16:23.160 --> 0:16:26.400
<v Speaker 1>I think I saw where he ranks fifth and sacks

0:16:26.400 --> 0:16:31.080
<v Speaker 1>in the NFL. He ranks ninety sixth in pass rush attempts.

0:16:33.480 --> 0:16:36.760
<v Speaker 1>That's a great stat So that's a great stat So yeah,

0:16:36.880 --> 0:16:39.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean and then when he's not doing that, he's

0:16:39.120 --> 0:16:42.360
<v Speaker 1>doing other things and he's I mean, which then then

0:16:42.400 --> 0:16:44.760
<v Speaker 1>people arguable, why is he only ranked ninety sixth? And

0:16:45.200 --> 0:16:47.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, like maybe you should be sending him right,

0:16:47.960 --> 0:16:49.880
<v Speaker 1>It's like like a pinch hitter that like leads the

0:16:49.960 --> 0:16:51.760
<v Speaker 1>league in homers. You wait, wait a second here, what

0:16:51.800 --> 0:16:54.200
<v Speaker 1>are we doing? Yeah? But I mean, honestly, you kind

0:16:54.200 --> 0:16:55.760
<v Speaker 1>of have to you and I had to scout discussion

0:16:55.760 --> 0:16:58.000
<v Speaker 1>of maybe a couple of weeks ago, like the what

0:16:58.160 --> 0:17:00.240
<v Speaker 1>you got right now at linebacker? You kind I need

0:17:00.320 --> 0:17:02.280
<v Speaker 1>him at linebacker when you get those pass rushers back.

0:17:02.320 --> 0:17:04.040
<v Speaker 1>I think you got to use him at linebacker just

0:17:04.080 --> 0:17:07.360
<v Speaker 1>because linebacker crew outside of him, it's not very good. Now,

0:17:07.359 --> 0:17:10.159
<v Speaker 1>in my opinion, I can't believe about that. I couldn't

0:17:10.160 --> 0:17:14.280
<v Speaker 1>believe honestly that Layton vander esh had one tackle and

0:17:14.440 --> 0:17:16.960
<v Speaker 1>zero solo tackles, just an assisted tackle for the game.

0:17:17.040 --> 0:17:19.160
<v Speaker 1>Has a lineback has a linebacker? I mean, that's that's

0:17:19.320 --> 0:17:21.160
<v Speaker 1>that's job number one. I mean at the actor, Broke

0:17:21.160 --> 0:17:24.160
<v Speaker 1>Cox got a line I got a tackle the other week,

0:17:24.200 --> 0:17:25.920
<v Speaker 1>and he's been on IR. I mean, I'm just saying,

0:17:25.920 --> 0:17:28.159
<v Speaker 1>you get you get tackles if you're a linebacker. Can

0:17:28.200 --> 0:17:30.239
<v Speaker 1>we talk about him real? We're gonna talk about him.

0:17:30.240 --> 0:17:32.080
<v Speaker 1>We gotta go to a break, but that's probably gonna

0:17:32.080 --> 0:17:33.919
<v Speaker 1>take a segment. So let's just go to break first

0:17:34.119 --> 0:17:36.240
<v Speaker 1>and we'll come back and we'll have a little conversation

0:17:36.320 --> 0:17:38.240
<v Speaker 1>on on Layton Vanderhull. We'll come right back. This is

0:17:38.320 --> 0:17:41.679
<v Speaker 1>das Cowboys dot com Rade at ATNC. Everyone new and

0:17:41.760 --> 0:17:44.760
<v Speaker 1>existing customers get our best deals on every smartphone. Why

0:17:45.240 --> 0:17:47.440
<v Speaker 1>because you deserve it. We're turning your living room into

0:17:47.480 --> 0:17:50.879
<v Speaker 1>your office and your gym. We're teaching Grandma had a

0:17:50.960 --> 0:17:53.639
<v Speaker 1>video call and teaching her again it's the button on

0:17:53.640 --> 0:17:57.560
<v Speaker 1>your left Nana, Okay, your other laughs. It's not complicated.

0:17:57.680 --> 0:18:00.960
<v Speaker 1>Everyone deserves something new, so a TNCs given everyone new

0:18:01.000 --> 0:18:03.720
<v Speaker 1>and existing customers are best deals with every unlimited plan

0:18:03.880 --> 0:18:06.320
<v Speaker 1>on every smartphone, even the latest Ones eighteen. Team may

0:18:06.320 --> 0:18:08.480
<v Speaker 1>temporalis lodate his spiece of the network's basic restrictings and

0:18:08.480 --> 0:18:11.639
<v Speaker 1>acceptance may apply. Hi, I'm Clint Tillison with man. I'm

0:18:11.760 --> 0:18:16.400
<v Speaker 1>Jay Novachek, and we're both with Nagin Turf, the official

0:18:16.480 --> 0:18:19.800
<v Speaker 1>tractor provider of the Dallas Cowboys. So if you need

0:18:19.840 --> 0:18:22.160
<v Speaker 1>a tractor to bail some hay, a'm more to cut

0:18:22.200 --> 0:18:24.640
<v Speaker 1>some grass, or a gator to get some chores done,

0:18:24.720 --> 0:18:28.879
<v Speaker 1>get a John Deer at Unitedagin Turf and then let's

0:18:28.920 --> 0:18:32.280
<v Speaker 1>get to work. Hey Jay, that's my line, well not today.

0:18:32.440 --> 0:18:34.880
<v Speaker 1>Get to work with a John Deere tractor package that's

0:18:35.000 --> 0:18:38.680
<v Speaker 1>just right for you in your budget. Visit Unitedaginturf dot com.

0:18:38.760 --> 0:18:40.680
<v Speaker 1>Before there was a draft, you get sized up a

0:18:40.760 --> 0:18:43.840
<v Speaker 1>cowboy by three simple factors. To crease in his hat,

0:18:44.000 --> 0:18:46.760
<v Speaker 1>the bend of his brim, and his unbending attitude. A

0:18:46.880 --> 0:18:49.640
<v Speaker 1>man stetson didn't just protect him from what life throw

0:18:49.680 --> 0:18:54.000
<v Speaker 1>at him, It projected a rugged, unstoppable spirit. Stetson hats

0:18:54.000 --> 0:18:57.000
<v Speaker 1>are still American, made with pride. Right here in Texas,

0:18:57.320 --> 0:19:00.840
<v Speaker 1>there's still the unofficial crowd of all self respect think Cowboys,

0:19:01.040 --> 0:19:03.159
<v Speaker 1>and Stetson is proud to be on the field with

0:19:03.200 --> 0:19:06.720
<v Speaker 1>America's team. Find a retailer nearest you at Stetson dot

0:19:06.760 --> 0:19:12.600
<v Speaker 1>com slash Cowboys New Doctor Peppers zero sugar. You deserve it.

0:19:12.800 --> 0:19:16.960
<v Speaker 1>I do deserve that. You deserve decadent flavor without sugar,

0:19:17.200 --> 0:19:20.720
<v Speaker 1>and a day at the beach without sand getting everywhere,

0:19:21.440 --> 0:19:24.359
<v Speaker 1>and a relaxing bath that your children don't interrupt. I

0:19:24.440 --> 0:19:27.719
<v Speaker 1>deserve all that. It's just a visual metaphor for doctor

0:19:27.760 --> 0:19:31.480
<v Speaker 1>Pepper zero sugar. Everything you want, nothing you don't, a

0:19:31.600 --> 0:19:34.560
<v Speaker 1>visual metaphor on the radio. I do deserve that Doctor

0:19:34.560 --> 0:19:38.400
<v Speaker 1>Pepper zero sugar, the zero you deserve is finally here.

0:19:43.359 --> 0:19:50.760
<v Speaker 1>Back to the break, it's a great people, great pay replay.

0:19:51.080 --> 0:19:54.199
<v Speaker 1>You've heard Jason Witten has joined the Caliber Collision team.

0:19:54.240 --> 0:19:56.040
<v Speaker 1>If you want to join them, do great work with

0:19:56.080 --> 0:19:59.000
<v Speaker 1>great people for great pay. Apply now at jobs at

0:19:59.000 --> 0:20:03.880
<v Speaker 1>caliberg dot com. That's jobs at Caliber dot com. Welcome back.

0:20:03.880 --> 0:20:05.600
<v Speaker 1>It is the second segment of the break. Clive from

0:20:05.640 --> 0:20:09.040
<v Speaker 1>the s WBC Mortgage Studios at the Star, we're talking

0:20:09.080 --> 0:20:11.720
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys football. We're into the final quarter of the season.

0:20:12.040 --> 0:20:14.800
<v Speaker 1>It's December and five more games left, and so we

0:20:14.800 --> 0:20:16.560
<v Speaker 1>should have a pretty good idea. We're past thanks again,

0:20:16.560 --> 0:20:17.920
<v Speaker 1>we should have a pretty good idea of this team.

0:20:17.960 --> 0:20:19.399
<v Speaker 1>So you guys should be able to give me some

0:20:19.480 --> 0:20:23.280
<v Speaker 1>very thoughtful answers here on this team. So here's the question.

0:20:23.720 --> 0:20:26.560
<v Speaker 1>We got this this question from Jazzy Joe on Twitter.

0:20:26.800 --> 0:20:31.119
<v Speaker 1>He says, why not right? Why not bench Layton vander

0:20:31.200 --> 0:20:37.160
<v Speaker 1>esh for who? For what? I hate that answer? Why no?

0:20:37.240 --> 0:20:39.280
<v Speaker 1>Not to say it's not right? I'm saying I hate

0:20:39.320 --> 0:20:41.800
<v Speaker 1>it because when you get into a situation where you

0:20:41.840 --> 0:20:44.040
<v Speaker 1>know a player is not playing very well, but you

0:20:44.080 --> 0:20:46.280
<v Speaker 1>don't have an answer like that's a product. I just

0:20:46.320 --> 0:20:48.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't like questions like that because it's like, you know,

0:20:48.840 --> 0:20:51.119
<v Speaker 1>we talked about it all the time. You you you

0:20:51.160 --> 0:20:52.959
<v Speaker 1>say it to us every time we come into your

0:20:52.960 --> 0:20:55.200
<v Speaker 1>office about something. You're like, okay, I hear you. But

0:20:55.200 --> 0:20:59.000
<v Speaker 1>but it's a solution. So I mean, that's that's what

0:20:59.040 --> 0:21:01.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm saying. I mean, if you had somebody sitting there

0:21:01.400 --> 0:21:03.480
<v Speaker 1>that was way better, you would do it. But I

0:21:03.480 --> 0:21:06.800
<v Speaker 1>mean Luke Gifford, who who Gifford? And Francis Bernard. No,

0:21:08.200 --> 0:21:12.080
<v Speaker 1>it's a sneaky, brutal loss that Jabril Cox towards a

0:21:12.160 --> 0:21:14.879
<v Speaker 1>clum and that's not this. I doubt he would be

0:21:14.920 --> 0:21:18.040
<v Speaker 1>playing all of the snaps right now, but they gave

0:21:18.080 --> 0:21:20.719
<v Speaker 1>him maybe be playing a significant him out by now.

0:21:20.800 --> 0:21:23.720
<v Speaker 1>They won't say. It's hard to say the number, but

0:21:23.720 --> 0:21:26.600
<v Speaker 1>it's bigger than sneaky. You're well, you're right, I mean,

0:21:26.640 --> 0:21:28.440
<v Speaker 1>I agree, I've been talking about it for weeks. I mean,

0:21:28.960 --> 0:21:31.120
<v Speaker 1>they would have been increasing his role this whole time,

0:21:31.200 --> 0:21:33.560
<v Speaker 1>right they started with goal line. If he answers that

0:21:33.640 --> 0:21:35.920
<v Speaker 1>it gets bigger and bigger. And oh, by the way,

0:21:36.800 --> 0:21:39.399
<v Speaker 1>Kean O'Neill and Layton Vanderesh, neither one of them is

0:21:39.440 --> 0:21:41.400
<v Speaker 1>really looking like a guy that you want to be

0:21:41.600 --> 0:21:44.679
<v Speaker 1>part of your long term future. Jabril Cox is. And

0:21:44.760 --> 0:21:47.600
<v Speaker 1>he would be that much more ready to assume a

0:21:47.600 --> 0:21:49.600
<v Speaker 1>bigger role next year if he was healthy right now,

0:21:49.600 --> 0:21:51.639
<v Speaker 1>and they'd have a better idea about him. Right you know,

0:21:51.640 --> 0:21:53.919
<v Speaker 1>then you're like, Okay, well Jabrill can do this, this

0:21:53.960 --> 0:21:56.000
<v Speaker 1>and this, but right now, he don't really know. Now,

0:21:56.160 --> 0:21:57.760
<v Speaker 1>what you do know is that he can chase down

0:21:57.840 --> 0:22:00.200
<v Speaker 1>Daniel Jones and like smack the heck out of him.

0:22:00.240 --> 0:22:02.159
<v Speaker 1>At the one, it's going like you're going into the

0:22:02.240 --> 0:22:06.119
<v Speaker 1>draft saying we have two studs who are only one

0:22:06.200 --> 0:22:09.680
<v Speaker 1>year into their contract at linebacker. Verse, Well, we got

0:22:09.720 --> 0:22:12.320
<v Speaker 1>Micah and we feel good about Cox about We don't

0:22:12.320 --> 0:22:15.280
<v Speaker 1>really know it's there'd be a domino effect there or

0:22:15.280 --> 0:22:19.080
<v Speaker 1>those decision making because it's like, okay, let's start instead

0:22:19.080 --> 0:22:21.840
<v Speaker 1>of linebacker, let's start at defensive end. What are we doing?

0:22:22.160 --> 0:22:25.200
<v Speaker 1>We were signing Randy if we do for how much

0:22:25.760 --> 0:22:28.560
<v Speaker 1>can we keep both of these guys? Is Mica gonna

0:22:28.560 --> 0:22:32.160
<v Speaker 1>play defensive end? You know that there's just a lot

0:22:32.200 --> 0:22:35.000
<v Speaker 1>of what's takes long term out exactly and then you

0:22:35.240 --> 0:22:37.560
<v Speaker 1>then you figure all this out. So it's it's an

0:22:37.560 --> 0:22:40.000
<v Speaker 1>interesting thing. But so go back to Layton. I mean,

0:22:40.240 --> 0:22:43.080
<v Speaker 1>I yeah, he's not playing like the guy we thought

0:22:43.119 --> 0:22:46.240
<v Speaker 1>he was, But I don't know if you have another

0:22:46.280 --> 0:22:48.840
<v Speaker 1>option right now. So see him just making plays that

0:22:48.840 --> 0:22:52.440
<v Speaker 1>are just getting I mean, he's making bad plays, making

0:22:52.560 --> 0:22:54.440
<v Speaker 1>some he's making some bad plays, but I mean I

0:22:54.680 --> 0:22:57.639
<v Speaker 1>think he's just not standing out as a linebacker. You

0:22:57.640 --> 0:22:59.240
<v Speaker 1>should stand out more than I want to try to

0:22:59.280 --> 0:23:02.440
<v Speaker 1>understand the how how did we get here to this

0:23:02.520 --> 0:23:06.320
<v Speaker 1>point of us talking about him in this way. I

0:23:06.400 --> 0:23:09.320
<v Speaker 1>know previous years he's been dealing with the injuries and

0:23:09.720 --> 0:23:11.679
<v Speaker 1>the times that he would go back on the field.

0:23:11.760 --> 0:23:13.919
<v Speaker 1>You know, you can blame the injury and say and

0:23:13.960 --> 0:23:16.640
<v Speaker 1>he would still make certain place here and there and

0:23:16.920 --> 0:23:20.080
<v Speaker 1>definitely looked better than what Jalen did at the time,

0:23:21.240 --> 0:23:24.240
<v Speaker 1>But then you never had him be fully healthy like

0:23:24.280 --> 0:23:26.439
<v Speaker 1>this year, he hasn't been out right. He's been playing

0:23:26.920 --> 0:23:29.960
<v Speaker 1>the whole time. I don't think he's missing, But but

0:23:30.040 --> 0:23:31.639
<v Speaker 1>you know something that I don't. I don't look at

0:23:31.680 --> 0:23:33.840
<v Speaker 1>him like I don't think he has played like he

0:23:33.880 --> 0:23:37.040
<v Speaker 1>did his rookie year. So no, never even in times

0:23:37.040 --> 0:23:39.400
<v Speaker 1>he came back from injury, like he could get a

0:23:39.440 --> 0:23:42.200
<v Speaker 1>player two here or there, But overall, I don't think

0:23:42.200 --> 0:23:44.639
<v Speaker 1>he's been back to that level, which does seem a

0:23:44.680 --> 0:23:47.280
<v Speaker 1>little curious that you could play as well as he

0:23:47.280 --> 0:23:48.840
<v Speaker 1>did his rookie year. I mean, god, was an All

0:23:48.840 --> 0:23:52.280
<v Speaker 1>Pro as a rookie and then just completely fall off

0:23:52.320 --> 0:23:55.520
<v Speaker 1>the map. Yeah, you go back to the game Thursday night,

0:23:55.800 --> 0:23:58.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean, where was Taysom Hill running a lot? Like

0:23:59.000 --> 0:24:00.600
<v Speaker 1>a lot of it was right up the middle. I'm

0:24:00.600 --> 0:24:02.879
<v Speaker 1>gonna between the tackles. I mean, so when they ran

0:24:02.960 --> 0:24:05.040
<v Speaker 1>the ball with Ingram, he was running up the middle.

0:24:05.359 --> 0:24:08.000
<v Speaker 1>You know they won't really going sideline to sideline that much. Yeah,

0:24:08.440 --> 0:24:11.159
<v Speaker 1>that's you should get four or five tackles just just

0:24:11.200 --> 0:24:13.440
<v Speaker 1>by doing that, you know. Like, and I gotta go

0:24:13.480 --> 0:24:15.000
<v Speaker 1>back and see how many snaps he had. But he

0:24:15.040 --> 0:24:17.120
<v Speaker 1>was out on the field. It's just he just wasn't

0:24:17.160 --> 0:24:20.280
<v Speaker 1>around the ball. And that's just odd for for him

0:24:20.320 --> 0:24:22.640
<v Speaker 1>and his style. I mean, because he's up there in time,

0:24:22.640 --> 0:24:26.200
<v Speaker 1>I would imagine I don't know this, he's probably fifth

0:24:26.200 --> 0:24:29.679
<v Speaker 1>on the team and tackles. Maybe it's not great for

0:24:29.680 --> 0:24:32.040
<v Speaker 1>a linebacker. No, no, you would, you know. I mean

0:24:32.040 --> 0:24:34.240
<v Speaker 1>this team is built differently. I mean Jayron curses leading

0:24:34.240 --> 0:24:37.520
<v Speaker 1>the leading the team and tackles, but they playing him

0:24:37.560 --> 0:24:41.239
<v Speaker 1>around there, um you know, and Barry Church will let

0:24:41.280 --> 0:24:43.600
<v Speaker 1>you know that too, because Barry Church, he's about to

0:24:44.160 --> 0:24:46.679
<v Speaker 1>be the first player since Barry Church. No, he's not

0:24:46.680 --> 0:24:48.840
<v Speaker 1>gonna catch him, but the first players Burry Church, you know,

0:24:48.880 --> 0:24:50.919
<v Speaker 1>for safety to lead the team and tackles. And he's like,

0:24:50.920 --> 0:24:53.800
<v Speaker 1>well he's playing like a linebacker. Barry asked me different

0:24:53.800 --> 0:24:54.879
<v Speaker 1>He's like, how many does he have? It was like

0:24:54.920 --> 0:24:57.080
<v Speaker 1>playing seventy five. He's like, oh, hen't catch me. I

0:24:57.119 --> 0:24:58.760
<v Speaker 1>had one third. He said he had one thirty five,

0:24:59.160 --> 0:25:01.720
<v Speaker 1>one thirty five. I don't remember. I remember one thirty five.

0:25:01.760 --> 0:25:04.160
<v Speaker 1>I know I know Barry a bad team. I can't

0:25:04.200 --> 0:25:05.760
<v Speaker 1>say I know Barry played in the box a lot.

0:25:05.760 --> 0:25:08.200
<v Speaker 1>But a safety with one thirty five times, Yeah, it

0:25:08.320 --> 0:25:09.959
<v Speaker 1>wasn't good. It's not a good thing. That means your

0:25:09.960 --> 0:25:13.080
<v Speaker 1>linebackers are really bad. Lay Layton played fifty six percent

0:25:13.080 --> 0:25:15.520
<v Speaker 1>of the snaps, so I mean he was he was

0:25:15.560 --> 0:25:17.840
<v Speaker 1>getting rotated a lot, but still one who was who

0:25:17.920 --> 0:25:20.879
<v Speaker 1>was Was it just Jayron playing that other linebacker spot

0:25:20.880 --> 0:25:22.640
<v Speaker 1>when he wasn't in there? If he's only playing fifty

0:25:22.640 --> 0:25:25.800
<v Speaker 1>percent of the snaps, Yeah, it had I mean yes,

0:25:25.840 --> 0:25:28.760
<v Speaker 1>because Kean O'Neill played even less than that. He played

0:25:28.800 --> 0:25:32.480
<v Speaker 1>thirty three. J Ron curse is he he is a linebacker.

0:25:32.520 --> 0:25:36.520
<v Speaker 1>He is there nickel and dime personnel box guy. It's

0:25:36.560 --> 0:25:38.440
<v Speaker 1>a different way to do it, but that's what he's

0:25:38.440 --> 0:25:43.320
<v Speaker 1>been doing. Ninety three No, yeah, nine sixty five snaps

0:25:44.400 --> 0:25:48.560
<v Speaker 1>and how many I mean he rushed a lot? Right? Yeah? Well,

0:25:48.840 --> 0:25:50.399
<v Speaker 1>I don't know about that because he played he was

0:25:50.440 --> 0:25:52.560
<v Speaker 1>at linebacker most of the game. He might have he

0:25:52.600 --> 0:25:54.560
<v Speaker 1>was on the line some, but he was at lineback round.

0:25:54.640 --> 0:26:00.000
<v Speaker 1>If he was good with that, then then that's that's perfect. Um.

0:26:00.080 --> 0:26:02.119
<v Speaker 1>You know. Here, here's a couple of things about about

0:26:02.240 --> 0:26:06.560
<v Speaker 1>his game. You always say this, Derek about DeMarcus Ware

0:26:06.840 --> 0:26:09.720
<v Speaker 1>guys that rushed the passer. There's two different types. There's

0:26:09.720 --> 0:26:11.320
<v Speaker 1>a guy that gets a lot of sacks and then

0:26:11.359 --> 0:26:13.439
<v Speaker 1>there's a guy to get the sackling when we have

0:26:13.560 --> 0:26:16.920
<v Speaker 1>to have it. Last two games, in overtime, he made

0:26:16.920 --> 0:26:19.040
<v Speaker 1>a play that you know, you would think that would

0:26:19.119 --> 0:26:21.159
<v Speaker 1>get you off the field set up a third and eighteen.

0:26:21.200 --> 0:26:23.600
<v Speaker 1>It just didn't work and they lost to the Raiders.

0:26:23.600 --> 0:26:25.080
<v Speaker 1>But he made a huge play in that game, and

0:26:25.080 --> 0:26:26.760
<v Speaker 1>he made one made the play of the game to

0:26:26.840 --> 0:26:29.040
<v Speaker 1>start the fourth quarter and they got him out of

0:26:29.040 --> 0:26:30.760
<v Speaker 1>field goal rings. He kept it a two score game

0:26:30.800 --> 0:26:32.880
<v Speaker 1>because it's a two score game for Taysom Hill. Guess

0:26:32.960 --> 0:26:34.320
<v Speaker 1>what it means. He has to throw it and guess

0:26:34.359 --> 0:26:37.000
<v Speaker 1>what The Cowboys caught just as many as the Saints

0:26:37.000 --> 0:26:39.280
<v Speaker 1>guys did. I think in the fourth Unless you have

0:26:39.800 --> 0:26:43.280
<v Speaker 1>Jalen Hurts or Lamar Jackson. I think you gotta consider

0:26:43.640 --> 0:26:49.040
<v Speaker 1>not running boots against this defense. It's just doesn't work. Yeah,

0:26:49.040 --> 0:26:51.400
<v Speaker 1>he's not the one to get fooled. He closes too. Well,

0:26:51.440 --> 0:26:53.879
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't get fooled, and he's gonna catch you. I

0:26:53.920 --> 0:26:56.440
<v Speaker 1>mean if he catches, if he can catch Taysom Hill

0:26:56.480 --> 0:26:58.359
<v Speaker 1>the way he did. I mean he did it to

0:26:58.440 --> 0:27:00.760
<v Speaker 1>Justin Herbert too, who's one of the more athletic quarterbacks

0:27:00.800 --> 0:27:04.120
<v Speaker 1>in the league. Like, unless you have a sprinter playing quarterback,

0:27:04.320 --> 0:27:06.359
<v Speaker 1>it's probably not worth the risk. All right, we're gonna

0:27:06.359 --> 0:27:08.800
<v Speaker 1>go to the next question. The biggest problem for the

0:27:08.920 --> 0:27:17.480
<v Speaker 1>Dallas offense is offensive line. Yeah, center guards. He's a

0:27:17.480 --> 0:27:22.480
<v Speaker 1>Pro Bowl vot vote getter. He plays for the Cowboys. Well,

0:27:23.320 --> 0:27:25.520
<v Speaker 1>hold on, hold on, hold been there for three weeks,

0:27:25.600 --> 0:27:29.560
<v Speaker 1>hold on, the last month of the season. Let's be fair.

0:27:29.760 --> 0:27:32.360
<v Speaker 1>He's been a lot better, a lot. I haven't seen

0:27:32.400 --> 0:27:35.040
<v Speaker 1>a whole lot of issues really with him. Snaps have

0:27:35.160 --> 0:27:39.000
<v Speaker 1>been good. He's played a full season. He has one season.

0:27:39.280 --> 0:27:42.159
<v Speaker 1>All right, he should be better. Right, that's kind of

0:27:42.200 --> 0:27:44.760
<v Speaker 1>what you're expecting. He I hate playing these games, and

0:27:44.800 --> 0:27:48.640
<v Speaker 1>I'll tell you why, because that like it all works

0:27:48.760 --> 0:27:53.440
<v Speaker 1>in harmony or disharmony, like Dak is pressing. I think

0:27:53.520 --> 0:27:56.080
<v Speaker 1>Dak is pressing. He's he's played better than a lot

0:27:56.119 --> 0:27:57.760
<v Speaker 1>of haters want to give him credit for. He had

0:27:57.800 --> 0:28:00.000
<v Speaker 1>three or four I meant to say that I was remote,

0:28:00.160 --> 0:28:02.080
<v Speaker 1>so I didn't want to like push the issue. He

0:28:02.119 --> 0:28:03.760
<v Speaker 1>had three or four of the best throws of his

0:28:03.840 --> 0:28:06.159
<v Speaker 1>season in New Orleans, like the one to Lamb that

0:28:06.320 --> 0:28:08.919
<v Speaker 1>kind of arcd through the slot over the guys. That

0:28:09.000 --> 0:28:12.080
<v Speaker 1>was incredible he had. Um, I know it was incomplete

0:28:12.080 --> 0:28:14.159
<v Speaker 1>and that you know, nobody cares about that. But the

0:28:14.880 --> 0:28:16.840
<v Speaker 1>one that Lamb caught in the back corner of the

0:28:16.920 --> 0:28:20.640
<v Speaker 1>end zone out of bounds, incredible, more by Lamb than Dak,

0:28:20.720 --> 0:28:25.720
<v Speaker 1>but still um yeah. He that was training camp. Lamb

0:28:25.760 --> 0:28:27.960
<v Speaker 1>like that the same play, similar play in training camp

0:28:27.960 --> 0:28:29.119
<v Speaker 1>where he was out of bounds. We were like, I

0:28:29.119 --> 0:28:31.320
<v Speaker 1>don't care, but it was such a great case, you know, right,

0:28:31.400 --> 0:28:35.800
<v Speaker 1>yeah put it up, so forget we're not posting that

0:28:35.800 --> 0:28:38.200
<v Speaker 1>that he was out of bounds. Like, no, it's a

0:28:38.200 --> 0:28:40.160
<v Speaker 1>great kids, you put it up. But fans want to

0:28:40.160 --> 0:28:43.000
<v Speaker 1>see that through like three or four laser beams in

0:28:43.000 --> 0:28:45.240
<v Speaker 1>that game. So it was like a lifetime ago. It

0:28:45.320 --> 0:28:48.880
<v Speaker 1>does it really does um, But I think he's pressing.

0:28:48.960 --> 0:28:51.560
<v Speaker 1>I think the offensive line has one day. The reason

0:28:51.600 --> 0:28:54.520
<v Speaker 1>that he's pressing, yeah, well, I mean are the receiver's

0:28:54.520 --> 0:28:57.200
<v Speaker 1>The reason that he's pressing is not having Amari Cooper

0:28:57.200 --> 0:28:59.600
<v Speaker 1>played Thursday, but it was like eighteen snaps. He was

0:28:59.600 --> 0:29:02.680
<v Speaker 1>basically a third and fourth down guy. Again, does not

0:29:02.800 --> 0:29:05.720
<v Speaker 1>having him to take pressure off of everybody else? Does

0:29:05.760 --> 0:29:07.560
<v Speaker 1>that make it harder to find the throwing? I mean,

0:29:07.600 --> 0:29:09.840
<v Speaker 1>and that is the question, what is the biggest problem.

0:29:09.880 --> 0:29:12.760
<v Speaker 1>I think it's I think they all connect. I mean yeah,

0:29:12.800 --> 0:29:16.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean seriously, like this is all taut. I've never

0:29:16.040 --> 0:29:22.440
<v Speaker 1>said this before, but the neckbones connected to the calf bone. Seriously, Okay,

0:29:22.520 --> 0:29:25.960
<v Speaker 1>it all I mean, I'm talking about Tyrant's issue that's

0:29:25.960 --> 0:29:28.160
<v Speaker 1>related all the way down and relates to Dak and

0:29:28.200 --> 0:29:31.200
<v Speaker 1>all and then Dak and then receivers they just have

0:29:31.360 --> 0:29:33.240
<v Speaker 1>they've been out of scene. Okay, So let me rephrase

0:29:33.320 --> 0:29:35.960
<v Speaker 1>the question. If you could fix one thing, what would

0:29:35.960 --> 0:29:39.200
<v Speaker 1>have the biggest impact. If I could fix one thing,

0:29:39.440 --> 0:29:43.960
<v Speaker 1>I just want this full compliment of receivers and everybody

0:29:44.000 --> 0:29:47.120
<v Speaker 1>that plays the skill position as healthy and available as possible,

0:29:47.120 --> 0:29:49.160
<v Speaker 1>because well, health is the biggest issue. I get to

0:29:49.200 --> 0:29:53.000
<v Speaker 1>fix one thing. Yeah, I'm Tyrant Smith is feels the

0:29:53.080 --> 0:29:55.200
<v Speaker 1>best he's ever felt for real. I mean he said

0:29:55.200 --> 0:29:56.720
<v Speaker 1>it before, but I'm talking about Do you think he's

0:29:56.720 --> 0:29:58.640
<v Speaker 1>not playing at the level that he was playing earlier

0:29:58.640 --> 0:30:01.720
<v Speaker 1>in the season. Probably not. I'm just saying I get

0:30:01.720 --> 0:30:05.680
<v Speaker 1>to fix one thing. I'm making him twenty fourteen Tyrants Smith.

0:30:05.760 --> 0:30:07.960
<v Speaker 1>That's why I'm making that would be that would be fun.

0:30:07.960 --> 0:30:10.720
<v Speaker 1>That would be fun. I mean he'd be like, I

0:30:10.720 --> 0:30:14.680
<v Speaker 1>don't know that's fixable, which is I'm just mister, I'm

0:30:14.720 --> 0:30:17.280
<v Speaker 1>dealing with the whole thing. I'm dealing with reality here,

0:30:17.400 --> 0:30:21.080
<v Speaker 1>which is the offensive line wasn't bad in New Orleans?

0:30:21.240 --> 0:30:22.960
<v Speaker 1>Were they? I mean they couldn't run the ball. They

0:30:22.960 --> 0:30:25.560
<v Speaker 1>couldn't run and that can't run the ball? Yeah? Um,

0:30:25.600 --> 0:30:27.760
<v Speaker 1>But like Dak had time. I think he got sacked

0:30:27.800 --> 0:30:29.680
<v Speaker 1>one time, and I know I know he got pressured

0:30:29.720 --> 0:30:31.360
<v Speaker 1>a few times, but like it wasn't just like that,

0:30:31.480 --> 0:30:34.840
<v Speaker 1>he had a lot good time. I I think that

0:30:35.000 --> 0:30:37.880
<v Speaker 1>highly of Amari Cooper that I think he opens things

0:30:37.960 --> 0:30:39.920
<v Speaker 1>up that much. If you're just telling me I can

0:30:39.960 --> 0:30:43.040
<v Speaker 1>have one thing, I just want him as healthy as possible.

0:30:43.320 --> 0:30:45.600
<v Speaker 1>Scaring the hell out of somebody on one side of

0:30:45.600 --> 0:30:48.360
<v Speaker 1>the formation and letting everybody else work off of that,

0:30:48.520 --> 0:30:51.360
<v Speaker 1>I think. And the beautiful thing is they can have

0:30:51.440 --> 0:30:54.280
<v Speaker 1>that as early as Sunday afternoon. So that's what I

0:30:54.280 --> 0:30:57.400
<v Speaker 1>would say, all right, cambelling that, I mean, I would

0:30:57.440 --> 0:31:00.920
<v Speaker 1>just go with the O line in general. You've seen

0:31:01.000 --> 0:31:04.320
<v Speaker 1>the passing game be affected by it. You've definitely seen

0:31:04.400 --> 0:31:07.240
<v Speaker 1>the running game. And I get it that when Nick

0:31:07.320 --> 0:31:11.480
<v Speaker 1>pulled up the stats, WHOA, Yeah, they made it sound

0:31:11.480 --> 0:31:14.600
<v Speaker 1>like they were actually kind of successful a little bit

0:31:14.720 --> 0:31:16.560
<v Speaker 1>in the running game last game. But to me, it

0:31:16.680 --> 0:31:18.960
<v Speaker 1>was a complete mess. And I get it. You can't

0:31:19.000 --> 0:31:21.959
<v Speaker 1>take away those two plays because they do count at

0:31:21.960 --> 0:31:23.800
<v Speaker 1>the end of the day. But at the same time,

0:31:23.840 --> 0:31:26.440
<v Speaker 1>looking back at other games in the season, you just

0:31:26.480 --> 0:31:28.720
<v Speaker 1>haven't been successful at the runs and you see them

0:31:28.800 --> 0:31:32.000
<v Speaker 1>unable to create holes for sig and that's a problem,

0:31:32.120 --> 0:31:34.560
<v Speaker 1>especially when you got a guy that has been dealing

0:31:34.640 --> 0:31:38.720
<v Speaker 1>with an injury himself. So to me, it's creating that balance,

0:31:39.080 --> 0:31:41.560
<v Speaker 1>a no line that's able to allow you to run

0:31:41.600 --> 0:31:45.440
<v Speaker 1>the game, to run the ball somehow kind of balance

0:31:45.600 --> 0:31:49.040
<v Speaker 1>both and not turn you one dimensional. Is that you're

0:31:49.040 --> 0:31:52.000
<v Speaker 1>saying in English? Yeah, not turn you one the dimensional.

0:31:52.240 --> 0:31:57.240
<v Speaker 1>And obviously we've seen Dak struggle at times. Like Dave said,

0:31:57.280 --> 0:32:01.160
<v Speaker 1>they got they oh my god, not speak English today.

0:32:01.480 --> 0:32:04.840
<v Speaker 1>They did get better last week. But I need them

0:32:04.920 --> 0:32:08.240
<v Speaker 1>to become more solid to where they can compliment each

0:32:08.240 --> 0:32:11.320
<v Speaker 1>other and allow them to do both things. And going

0:32:11.360 --> 0:32:13.680
<v Speaker 1>back to the running game, I think my point there

0:32:13.840 --> 0:32:17.960
<v Speaker 1>is anybody who's ever won a lottery ticket before, how

0:32:17.960 --> 0:32:20.120
<v Speaker 1>many of do you think that they've lost? How many

0:32:20.160 --> 0:32:22.160
<v Speaker 1>how much of that little shavings you think are on

0:32:22.200 --> 0:32:24.520
<v Speaker 1>their ground right there because they're doing it all the time,

0:32:24.560 --> 0:32:25.840
<v Speaker 1>and they do it all the time, and that's what

0:32:25.840 --> 0:32:27.800
<v Speaker 1>they think. But you gotta keep doing it if you're

0:32:27.800 --> 0:32:29.960
<v Speaker 1>gonna win. People say, well, I haven't win the lottery

0:32:29.960 --> 0:32:31.920
<v Speaker 1>one day. It's like, okay, but do you play? No,

0:32:32.080 --> 0:32:33.600
<v Speaker 1>you don't. You have to play. And so that's the

0:32:33.640 --> 0:32:35.480
<v Speaker 1>thing about running the ball, like you're gonna keep doing it.

0:32:35.480 --> 0:32:37.240
<v Speaker 1>You gotta stick to it. You gotta keep running because

0:32:37.240 --> 0:32:39.400
<v Speaker 1>every once in a while you're gonna get that ticket.

0:32:39.440 --> 0:32:41.520
<v Speaker 1>And that's what Tony Poler did. But you gotta keep

0:32:41.640 --> 0:32:44.320
<v Speaker 1>doing it, and that's what you and that's why I

0:32:44.360 --> 0:32:46.720
<v Speaker 1>think it all factors in that they didn't lose the

0:32:46.760 --> 0:32:49.360
<v Speaker 1>commitment to do it all right, Speaking of the running game,

0:32:49.400 --> 0:32:52.360
<v Speaker 1>next question, the running back that gives Dallas the best

0:32:52.440 --> 0:32:55.800
<v Speaker 1>chance to win as we sit here today is blank

0:32:56.960 --> 0:33:01.160
<v Speaker 1>seek Pollard, Why are you doing? What year is this there?

0:33:01.280 --> 0:33:07.360
<v Speaker 1>Because that's what we're doing. What years? I twenty twenty one.

0:33:07.640 --> 0:33:09.920
<v Speaker 1>That's the year that we're in, and that's the that's

0:33:09.920 --> 0:33:13.560
<v Speaker 1>the running back combination that helps this team twenty twenty one.

0:33:13.320 --> 0:33:15.920
<v Speaker 1>Tony Tony Pollard is better with the ball in his

0:33:16.000 --> 0:33:19.880
<v Speaker 1>hands right now. Zeke Elliott is a well rounded enough

0:33:19.960 --> 0:33:22.760
<v Speaker 1>running back that he needs to be part of the

0:33:22.800 --> 0:33:25.479
<v Speaker 1>offense too. How how many, like I can't count, how

0:33:25.480 --> 0:33:28.520
<v Speaker 1>many times Zeke has absolutely smashed somebody that would have

0:33:28.560 --> 0:33:32.000
<v Speaker 1>killed Dak. You can't take that out. You can't discard

0:33:32.040 --> 0:33:35.160
<v Speaker 1>it because Zeke's not dangerous as a runner, and he's not.

0:33:35.360 --> 0:33:38.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure he feels like crap, his knee hurt and

0:33:38.240 --> 0:33:40.080
<v Speaker 1>it sucks. It sucks for him that he's dealing with that.

0:33:40.600 --> 0:33:43.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm but I need him both. I said it going

0:33:43.400 --> 0:33:45.520
<v Speaker 1>into that game, and you do have to have them both.

0:33:45.640 --> 0:33:48.160
<v Speaker 1>My question becomes if if we all agree, it sounds

0:33:48.160 --> 0:33:50.560
<v Speaker 1>like we all agree that Poller is a better runner

0:33:50.600 --> 0:33:52.800
<v Speaker 1>at this at this point. And again that could be

0:33:52.800 --> 0:33:54.240
<v Speaker 1>because of injury, That could be he has of a

0:33:54.320 --> 0:33:56.000
<v Speaker 1>lot of things. But if we think he is a

0:33:56.040 --> 0:34:01.520
<v Speaker 1>better runner, should he not be getting more carries? Well? Sure, yes,

0:34:01.720 --> 0:34:04.840
<v Speaker 1>and unless I mean see how Zeke feels. We talked

0:34:04.880 --> 0:34:07.200
<v Speaker 1>for weeks about this break. I mean they've been off

0:34:07.240 --> 0:34:10.719
<v Speaker 1>since they landed in Dallas on Friday morning. Ten days

0:34:10.800 --> 0:34:12.440
<v Speaker 1>is a good amount of time to get get some

0:34:12.440 --> 0:34:16.080
<v Speaker 1>stuff right. If if he feels significantly better, then I

0:34:16.080 --> 0:34:18.279
<v Speaker 1>would keep it the same. But if this is still

0:34:18.360 --> 0:34:22.280
<v Speaker 1>an issue, then yes, I would prefer them not bury

0:34:22.320 --> 0:34:24.399
<v Speaker 1>their head in the sand about who is a more

0:34:24.480 --> 0:34:27.720
<v Speaker 1>valuable runner? All right, So we got fast forward to Sunday,

0:34:28.120 --> 0:34:30.360
<v Speaker 1>three minutes and thirty five seconds to go in the

0:34:30.400 --> 0:34:34.920
<v Speaker 1>game Rights Washington, whatever, has two time outs, Cowboys have

0:34:34.920 --> 0:34:37.320
<v Speaker 1>a lead twenty four to twenty one. You got you

0:34:37.320 --> 0:34:39.360
<v Speaker 1>gotta run the ball, you gotta get you run this

0:34:39.400 --> 0:34:41.880
<v Speaker 1>clock out. And I know it's hard to answer that

0:34:41.880 --> 0:34:43.520
<v Speaker 1>because you don't know how the game has gone on.

0:34:44.200 --> 0:34:46.319
<v Speaker 1>But do you think Zeke's the guy? I mean, Zeke?

0:34:46.440 --> 0:34:48.640
<v Speaker 1>Or do you want Pollard running the ball when you

0:34:48.680 --> 0:34:50.480
<v Speaker 1>know there's gonna be a stack front? Who do you

0:34:50.480 --> 0:34:52.719
<v Speaker 1>want running the ball right there. Based on what I've

0:34:52.719 --> 0:34:56.960
<v Speaker 1>seen over the last I don't know, four to six games,

0:34:57.360 --> 0:35:00.400
<v Speaker 1>I think i'd rather have running the ball again. The

0:35:00.440 --> 0:35:03.239
<v Speaker 1>only reason is because I think they're both gonna get

0:35:03.360 --> 0:35:07.840
<v Speaker 1>stopped a lot. Two yard game, one yard game maybe negative.

0:35:08.239 --> 0:35:10.120
<v Speaker 1>I think that's going to happen because this offensive line

0:35:10.120 --> 0:35:13.000
<v Speaker 1>isn't blocking very well in the run game. Here's the difference.

0:35:13.040 --> 0:35:15.799
<v Speaker 1>The difference is if Pola gets that crease, he might

0:35:15.840 --> 0:35:18.400
<v Speaker 1>go fifty. I don't think Zeke's gonna do that, And

0:35:18.440 --> 0:35:20.360
<v Speaker 1>so that's where I think they're about that. There was

0:35:20.400 --> 0:35:21.880
<v Speaker 1>a time you get don't get me wrong, there was

0:35:21.920 --> 0:35:24.400
<v Speaker 1>a time when even though I thought Paula had the

0:35:24.440 --> 0:35:28.080
<v Speaker 1>home run ability, Zeke was still going four, six, seven.

0:35:28.480 --> 0:35:31.000
<v Speaker 1>You know that's not really happening as much right now.

0:35:31.040 --> 0:35:32.680
<v Speaker 1>And that's why I think i'd rather go to Polar.

0:35:33.160 --> 0:35:36.000
<v Speaker 1>I hear, I hear that, But I don't need fifty

0:35:36.200 --> 0:35:38.120
<v Speaker 1>so much there, You know, you need ten or eleven.

0:35:38.160 --> 0:35:40.480
<v Speaker 1>What I wonder is and I haven't seen Polar do

0:35:40.520 --> 0:35:42.279
<v Speaker 1>this a lot. I haven't seen Zeke a lot either,

0:35:42.320 --> 0:35:45.160
<v Speaker 1>But like I'm talking about, when you get hit one yard,

0:35:45.800 --> 0:35:48.160
<v Speaker 1>do you make it three? Are you making it? But

0:35:48.160 --> 0:35:50.040
<v Speaker 1>that's my point. I don't think Zeke has been doing

0:35:50.040 --> 0:35:52.840
<v Speaker 1>that much recently, like and I haven't been seen that

0:35:52.840 --> 0:35:54.759
<v Speaker 1>from Zeke. I think Pollard's better at that than he

0:35:54.800 --> 0:35:58.000
<v Speaker 1>gets credit for it. People like to say he can't

0:35:58.000 --> 0:36:00.239
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't run between the tac He absolutely run. He

0:36:00.960 --> 0:36:03.680
<v Speaker 1>is not like he's not a dainty back like he'll

0:36:03.800 --> 0:36:06.680
<v Speaker 1>yeah he can do that. Uh me. Personally, he's like

0:36:06.719 --> 0:36:11.880
<v Speaker 1>Tony Dorset. Honestly, we compared Michael Lawrence Taylor. But Tony

0:36:11.920 --> 0:36:15.160
<v Speaker 1>Dorset was big, but he was fast and he could

0:36:15.200 --> 0:36:17.000
<v Speaker 1>get through and all that. I mean, oh my god,

0:36:17.040 --> 0:36:20.719
<v Speaker 1>I can't believe that Tony po I would just I

0:36:20.760 --> 0:36:22.840
<v Speaker 1>would motion CD out of the slot, give him a

0:36:22.920 --> 0:36:24.759
<v Speaker 1>jet sweep and have him get nine and then it

0:36:24.800 --> 0:36:26.680
<v Speaker 1>doesn't matter who gets the last one. That's what I

0:36:26.680 --> 0:36:30.080
<v Speaker 1>would do. But shouts out Kellen, maybe see more of that.

0:36:30.080 --> 0:36:33.000
<v Speaker 1>That's and that's what that's what Bob. You're right, you

0:36:33.080 --> 0:36:35.600
<v Speaker 1>do have to have patience and commitment to the running game.

0:36:36.000 --> 0:36:38.920
<v Speaker 1>But again, they ran six They ran for more than

0:36:38.960 --> 0:36:41.960
<v Speaker 1>three yards six times out of twenty four. Mix it up.

0:36:42.120 --> 0:36:45.160
<v Speaker 1>They got athlete and run to the side. That's what happened.

0:36:45.200 --> 0:36:47.880
<v Speaker 1>Their running game was outside the tackles, and that's maybe

0:36:47.920 --> 0:36:49.560
<v Speaker 1>what they have to do. And you're not going to

0:36:49.680 --> 0:36:51.520
<v Speaker 1>run a toss. You're not gonna run a toss sweep

0:36:51.520 --> 0:36:53.680
<v Speaker 1>every time you run it. I get it, But there's

0:36:53.719 --> 0:36:55.560
<v Speaker 1>got to be more ways you can vary up what

0:36:55.560 --> 0:36:58.480
<v Speaker 1>you're doing than like, here we go a dive. Right, Damn,

0:36:58.520 --> 0:37:00.480
<v Speaker 1>it didn't work again. All right, let's try it to

0:37:00.520 --> 0:37:03.120
<v Speaker 1>the left this time. Now, be a little more original

0:37:03.160 --> 0:37:06.080
<v Speaker 1>than that. All right, final question before we get to

0:37:06.120 --> 0:37:09.280
<v Speaker 1>some fan questions. When Terrence still returns from COVID protocol,

0:37:09.400 --> 0:37:13.080
<v Speaker 1>who should start at the right tackle again? Should this

0:37:13.160 --> 0:37:15.839
<v Speaker 1>is your opinion, not what you think will happen. Who

0:37:15.880 --> 0:37:20.320
<v Speaker 1>should be your starter at right tackle? I'm like whatever,

0:37:20.440 --> 0:37:24.880
<v Speaker 1>at this point, you're still you're gonna do whatever? Have you?

0:37:25.239 --> 0:37:28.720
<v Speaker 1>Have you noticed and have you noticed a noticeable difference

0:37:28.920 --> 0:37:31.799
<v Speaker 1>between the two of them? Honestly, I have no. I

0:37:31.840 --> 0:37:33.839
<v Speaker 1>can't sit here and tell you that I have. And

0:37:33.880 --> 0:37:36.200
<v Speaker 1>the only way, the only way I think there could

0:37:36.239 --> 0:37:39.919
<v Speaker 1>be a case made for one it would be if

0:37:39.960 --> 0:37:42.520
<v Speaker 1>you wanted to move the other to another position. Yeah,

0:37:42.600 --> 0:37:45.480
<v Speaker 1>if you thought we're still having problems at left guard,

0:37:45.480 --> 0:37:48.560
<v Speaker 1>which I think they are, and you thought Ile Collins

0:37:48.640 --> 0:37:50.520
<v Speaker 1>is a better option than either of the two guards

0:37:50.520 --> 0:37:52.799
<v Speaker 1>we have played, either either of the two guys we

0:37:52.840 --> 0:37:56.600
<v Speaker 1>have playing left guard, then I say, still returns at

0:37:56.680 --> 0:37:59.800
<v Speaker 1>right tackle. You move I all Collins to left guard

0:38:00.320 --> 0:38:01.919
<v Speaker 1>and see what you can get out of that. Yeah.

0:38:02.040 --> 0:38:05.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't think there's a way to answer this without

0:38:05.080 --> 0:38:08.000
<v Speaker 1>bringing in the politics of football that everybody wants to

0:38:08.000 --> 0:38:11.640
<v Speaker 1>pretend don't exist. But if you're moving, if you put

0:38:11.719 --> 0:38:16.040
<v Speaker 1>Terrence Steel back there, then I just assume you're making significant,

0:38:16.080 --> 0:38:18.960
<v Speaker 1>big term decisions like that means something for next year.

0:38:19.080 --> 0:38:22.520
<v Speaker 1>Lyle Collins I assume won't be here if he's not

0:38:22.560 --> 0:38:25.279
<v Speaker 1>your starting right tackle. Like I doubt he wants to

0:38:25.280 --> 0:38:28.760
<v Speaker 1>play left guard permanently. The money's at tackle. He's always

0:38:28.760 --> 0:38:32.719
<v Speaker 1>said he views himself as a tackle, and so I'll

0:38:32.760 --> 0:38:35.160
<v Speaker 1>just say I think he should be the starting right

0:38:35.160 --> 0:38:38.440
<v Speaker 1>tackle unless you are committed to shuffling things up in

0:38:38.480 --> 0:38:42.080
<v Speaker 1>the offseason, which that's fine if you are, but you're

0:38:42.120 --> 0:38:44.160
<v Speaker 1>just I don't think you're making that move unless you're

0:38:44.160 --> 0:38:48.600
<v Speaker 1>comfortable making big decisions about that later on. Yeah, I mean,

0:38:48.600 --> 0:38:50.640
<v Speaker 1>I would just keep things the way they are unless

0:38:50.640 --> 0:38:53.000
<v Speaker 1>you're deciding to do that. Yeah, and you said, what's

0:38:53.040 --> 0:38:56.440
<v Speaker 1>the most significant difference between the two, and there it is.

0:38:56.480 --> 0:38:58.479
<v Speaker 1>I mean I just looked it up. Six point one million,

0:38:58.560 --> 0:39:01.480
<v Speaker 1>seven hundred and eighty thousand. That's their cap hit when

0:39:01.520 --> 0:39:04.440
<v Speaker 1>it steals deal up. It's an undrafted free agent, so

0:39:04.480 --> 0:39:06.520
<v Speaker 1>he should have one more. He'll be restrict got time

0:39:06.560 --> 0:39:10.040
<v Speaker 1>with him at this amount of money, he'll be restricted. Yeah,

0:39:10.040 --> 0:39:12.200
<v Speaker 1>that's true. Three year deal and you're restricted. So I

0:39:12.200 --> 0:39:16.720
<v Speaker 1>mean it's very easy to hang on to. On the field.

0:39:16.760 --> 0:39:20.680
<v Speaker 1>You guys have said there's not a significant difference. But

0:39:21.360 --> 0:39:23.719
<v Speaker 1>if we go back to the time that Dale was

0:39:23.960 --> 0:39:27.120
<v Speaker 1>brought by, can I think that since then the old

0:39:27.200 --> 0:39:30.560
<v Speaker 1>line has not played as good as they were playing

0:39:30.600 --> 0:39:34.719
<v Speaker 1>prior to that change. Fair So, however, you put it

0:39:35.080 --> 0:39:38.200
<v Speaker 1>aside from Connor Williams making the mistakes that he was

0:39:38.280 --> 0:39:40.960
<v Speaker 1>making and all that, I think that the offensive line

0:39:41.400 --> 0:39:45.720
<v Speaker 1>did become worse after that. I'm going back to Connor Williams.

0:39:45.760 --> 0:39:48.239
<v Speaker 1>If we were asking questions, that's would be what I

0:39:48.239 --> 0:39:50.399
<v Speaker 1>would do. I don't know about the right tackle. I'll

0:39:50.440 --> 0:39:52.600
<v Speaker 1>tell you I'd go back to Connor Williams at left guard.

0:39:52.800 --> 0:39:55.839
<v Speaker 1>I think I picked your penalties and and and play

0:39:55.840 --> 0:39:58.240
<v Speaker 1>it life. You think he's been He was better earlier

0:39:58.280 --> 0:40:00.360
<v Speaker 1>this season then than what we've seen from a The

0:40:00.400 --> 0:40:02.680
<v Speaker 1>running game has been better. I mean, it's still her point.

0:40:02.719 --> 0:40:05.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean, and you're right about that. That also was

0:40:05.239 --> 0:40:07.920
<v Speaker 1>happening around that time. I think that they ran the

0:40:07.960 --> 0:40:11.480
<v Speaker 1>ball better with him, and now the penalties a certainly

0:40:11.480 --> 0:40:14.640
<v Speaker 1>a problem, but you know, I mean, Connor has Sam

0:40:15.560 --> 0:40:18.080
<v Speaker 1>McGovern has some not not to that level, but I

0:40:18.120 --> 0:40:20.920
<v Speaker 1>think that he was blocking better too, So I think

0:40:20.960 --> 0:40:23.640
<v Speaker 1>I would go back to that. I don't I don't disagree,

0:40:23.719 --> 0:40:25.760
<v Speaker 1>and I don't know that Connor McGovern has been awful,

0:40:25.760 --> 0:40:27.400
<v Speaker 1>but yeah, I'm not hasn't known him under the bus.

0:40:27.520 --> 0:40:30.279
<v Speaker 1>He hasn't improved anything. But point that you're like, yes,

0:40:30.360 --> 0:40:32.400
<v Speaker 1>this was a gay call, but same thing. I'm not

0:40:32.400 --> 0:40:34.279
<v Speaker 1>going to look that up. But it's the same type

0:40:34.280 --> 0:40:36.880
<v Speaker 1>of deal we're talking about next year. If it's that

0:40:37.040 --> 0:40:39.440
<v Speaker 1>close on the field, Yeah, one guy you think is

0:40:39.480 --> 0:40:41.680
<v Speaker 1>not going to be here, one guy is. Then it

0:40:41.719 --> 0:40:43.919
<v Speaker 1>goes back to the Jabril Cox thing. It's like, God,

0:40:43.920 --> 0:40:46.719
<v Speaker 1>I wish when it comes time to making decisions, what

0:40:46.719 --> 0:40:48.359
<v Speaker 1>do we know about this guy? And if you never

0:40:48.360 --> 0:40:50.799
<v Speaker 1>played McGovern, then you're like, how how are you going

0:40:50.880 --> 0:40:52.600
<v Speaker 1>to sit there and fight for him if you didn't

0:40:52.600 --> 0:40:55.200
<v Speaker 1>play him. So that's a really good point. And I

0:40:55.200 --> 0:40:58.359
<v Speaker 1>think anybody anybody knows by now that I'm an LC

0:40:58.600 --> 0:41:01.000
<v Speaker 1>stand he went to LSU. We get it. But like,

0:41:01.640 --> 0:41:04.600
<v Speaker 1>this is a business and for a team that's kind

0:41:04.600 --> 0:41:07.279
<v Speaker 1>of going to be close up against the cap if

0:41:07.320 --> 0:41:09.080
<v Speaker 1>you think, I mean we just said, we don't think

0:41:09.080 --> 0:41:11.280
<v Speaker 1>there's that big of a difference. But except for the money,

0:41:11.320 --> 0:41:13.879
<v Speaker 1>and so Terrence Steele could be a way to get you.

0:41:14.040 --> 0:41:16.240
<v Speaker 1>You're like, wow, we're only paying our starting right tackle

0:41:16.440 --> 0:41:18.839
<v Speaker 1>eight hundred thousand dollars. That could really help us out

0:41:18.840 --> 0:41:21.480
<v Speaker 1>in the spring. So that's something you have to consider.

0:41:21.600 --> 0:41:23.600
<v Speaker 1>And to be fair, I don't know, I don't know

0:41:23.600 --> 0:41:25.120
<v Speaker 1>if you saw this, but I don't know how much

0:41:25.120 --> 0:41:27.680
<v Speaker 1>it would cost to release or trade Lyle. I don't

0:41:27.719 --> 0:41:30.759
<v Speaker 1>know that stuff. But yeah, I'm sure there would be

0:41:30.840 --> 0:41:33.840
<v Speaker 1>a pretty sizable dead cap hit. Yeah, but all right,

0:41:33.880 --> 0:41:35.560
<v Speaker 1>I would make a big change and go back to

0:41:35.600 --> 0:41:40.719
<v Speaker 1>what you had before where you were le bench. You

0:41:40.840 --> 0:41:43.840
<v Speaker 1>got Connor Williams back in. Connor McGovern used him the

0:41:43.960 --> 0:41:47.080
<v Speaker 1>way you were utilizing him. That was very creative. I

0:41:47.120 --> 0:41:51.040
<v Speaker 1>think that added an extra spice to the offense. So

0:41:51.360 --> 0:41:53.640
<v Speaker 1>do it that way. And I mean I think you

0:41:53.719 --> 0:41:57.479
<v Speaker 1>get more out of both players in that kind of role.

0:41:57.560 --> 0:42:01.960
<v Speaker 1>You get more out of both connors like Connor Williams

0:42:02.000 --> 0:42:05.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of my gover. Yes, But anyways, I would go

0:42:05.080 --> 0:42:06.759
<v Speaker 1>back to that. I love the way you make it

0:42:06.840 --> 0:42:09.200
<v Speaker 1>so simple. Actually think we ought it is. People like

0:42:09.280 --> 0:42:14.360
<v Speaker 1>to over um what's the opposite of simple? Complicate? Complicated?

0:42:14.680 --> 0:42:17.880
<v Speaker 1>See I cannot speak today what my vocabulary there is?

0:42:18.000 --> 0:42:20.239
<v Speaker 1>There is something the fact that, like, you still are

0:42:20.320 --> 0:42:21.960
<v Speaker 1>dealing with human beings, so you do have to deal

0:42:22.000 --> 0:42:24.640
<v Speaker 1>with emotions and you have to deal with you know,

0:42:24.719 --> 0:42:27.040
<v Speaker 1>you don't want to create division, you want to create unities.

0:42:27.080 --> 0:42:28.640
<v Speaker 1>There are a lot of things to factor in when

0:42:28.640 --> 0:42:30.920
<v Speaker 1>you start talking about how you make decisions with a

0:42:30.920 --> 0:42:33.560
<v Speaker 1>group of people hard business. I know it is going

0:42:34.200 --> 0:42:37.000
<v Speaker 1>back to that aspect. I mean, if their hell bents

0:42:37.000 --> 0:42:39.600
<v Speaker 1>on doing it, I guess they could. But like getting

0:42:39.719 --> 0:42:42.960
<v Speaker 1>rid of vile doesn't really do anything for you, Like

0:42:43.040 --> 0:42:45.680
<v Speaker 1>it's a fourteen million dollar cap hit and a one

0:42:45.719 --> 0:42:48.359
<v Speaker 1>point three million dollars savings And even if you did

0:42:48.360 --> 0:42:50.759
<v Speaker 1>it as a June one, you'd just be spreading that

0:42:50.800 --> 0:42:54.040
<v Speaker 1>out over two years, so it wouldn't hit you wow.

0:42:55.200 --> 0:42:57.880
<v Speaker 1>Now yeah, okay, you would save ten million if you

0:42:57.920 --> 0:43:00.640
<v Speaker 1>made them a post June one. Again, I'm not doing

0:43:00.680 --> 0:43:03.480
<v Speaker 1>that deep in the weeks here, but Tyron Smith hasn't

0:43:03.520 --> 0:43:06.240
<v Speaker 1>proven to me that he can just completely stay healthy.

0:43:06.400 --> 0:43:08.640
<v Speaker 1>Point and with all the problems you gotta tax here, absolutely,

0:43:08.840 --> 0:43:12.279
<v Speaker 1>and I'm maybe drafting one. And yeah, we're all we're

0:43:12.280 --> 0:43:15.640
<v Speaker 1>all frustrated that the running game has disappeared, but it's

0:43:15.640 --> 0:43:17.799
<v Speaker 1>still a good thing to have three tackles, Like that's

0:43:17.800 --> 0:43:19.640
<v Speaker 1>not a problem you have to solve. And to be

0:43:19.719 --> 0:43:21.520
<v Speaker 1>quite honest with you, I think the Cowboys are now

0:43:21.560 --> 0:43:23.560
<v Speaker 1>at the point where they were years ago when they

0:43:23.640 --> 0:43:26.120
<v Speaker 1>drafted Travis Frederick and they meet the remade their offensive

0:43:26.120 --> 0:43:27.759
<v Speaker 1>line over the next several years. That's where they are

0:43:27.840 --> 0:43:29.920
<v Speaker 1>right now. If there's this offseason, they need to start thinking,

0:43:30.040 --> 0:43:32.680
<v Speaker 1>we need to focus on our offensive line because although

0:43:32.760 --> 0:43:35.440
<v Speaker 1>Tyren still plays well, time's at an age where his

0:43:35.520 --> 0:43:39.400
<v Speaker 1>health is failing. I'm getting the next Zach Martin um

0:43:39.440 --> 0:43:42.480
<v Speaker 1>slash Connor Williams in between them, because that's probably where

0:43:42.480 --> 0:43:44.880
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna be picking. You're not gonna picking them at fourteen.

0:43:44.920 --> 0:43:47.520
<v Speaker 1>You're not gonna be you know, fifty, A guy that

0:43:47.600 --> 0:43:51.600
<v Speaker 1>played guard or tackle, that can play guard and projectiment guard.

0:43:51.920 --> 0:43:54.120
<v Speaker 1>That's the guy that I'm taking in the mid twenties

0:43:54.160 --> 0:43:56.680
<v Speaker 1>or wherever, thirty, wherever you're picking out. Well, sobody's gonna

0:43:56.680 --> 0:44:00.560
<v Speaker 1>be playing soon though. That that Chargers left tackles pretty badass,

0:44:00.840 --> 0:44:03.440
<v Speaker 1>just saying no, you can't and you can't sit there

0:44:03.440 --> 0:44:05.960
<v Speaker 1>and compare him to ld and yeah, I'm not he's nice,

0:44:06.000 --> 0:44:10.640
<v Speaker 1>but the Chargers are not. I'm not saying I'm not

0:44:10.680 --> 0:44:13.800
<v Speaker 1>saying ah, I'm not saying they made a mistake. But again,

0:44:13.960 --> 0:44:15.400
<v Speaker 1>this is what we were saying, This is what we

0:44:15.400 --> 0:44:18.400
<v Speaker 1>were talking about a month ago. If for Shawn Slater's

0:44:18.440 --> 0:44:20.920
<v Speaker 1>and All Pro for the next decade the way Tyron

0:44:20.920 --> 0:44:24.839
<v Speaker 1>Smith has been eight years from now, you might rethink that,

0:44:24.960 --> 0:44:28.200
<v Speaker 1>although right now, no way in hell Mica is as

0:44:28.360 --> 0:44:30.960
<v Speaker 1>dynamic a defensive player as he's shown himself to be

0:44:31.080 --> 0:44:33.520
<v Speaker 1>so far, for the next eight years, I think every

0:44:33.520 --> 0:44:35.680
<v Speaker 1>team would take him over that. Let me ask you this,

0:44:35.880 --> 0:44:37.920
<v Speaker 1>this is this is kind of similar. In two thousand

0:44:38.000 --> 0:44:41.520
<v Speaker 1>and eleven, the Cowboys had a chance to draft J. J. Watt.

0:44:41.719 --> 0:44:44.479
<v Speaker 1>They didn't. They drafted Tyron Smith right. Do you think

0:44:44.480 --> 0:44:46.239
<v Speaker 1>that and this is close, I mean, do you think

0:44:46.280 --> 0:44:49.320
<v Speaker 1>that they regretted that or do you think Houston was like, Man,

0:44:49.480 --> 0:44:51.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm glad because that's one of what we're talking about,

0:44:51.440 --> 0:44:53.960
<v Speaker 1>and I think there could be him again. Everybody always

0:44:54.000 --> 0:44:56.320
<v Speaker 1>wants to be right. I this might be a situation

0:44:56.360 --> 0:44:59.360
<v Speaker 1>where there's no wrong. Both they're both and both teams

0:44:59.400 --> 0:45:00.719
<v Speaker 1>might be like, yeah, we did the right And it

0:45:00.760 --> 0:45:02.560
<v Speaker 1>kind of depends on what you need from your team. Right,

0:45:02.600 --> 0:45:05.000
<v Speaker 1>if you want that dominant defensive player, then you want that.

0:45:05.080 --> 0:45:08.520
<v Speaker 1>If you want that and I'm there forever, then that's true.

0:45:08.600 --> 0:45:10.239
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's just what your flavor is. Not trying

0:45:10.239 --> 0:45:13.680
<v Speaker 1>to suggest they're wrong for drafting Mica. It's just interesting.

0:45:13.760 --> 0:45:16.560
<v Speaker 1>And that's what makes the draft so great is he's over,

0:45:16.640 --> 0:45:19.080
<v Speaker 1>he's balling out, he's playing. I mean, he could win

0:45:19.120 --> 0:45:21.120
<v Speaker 1>Offensive Rookie of the Year. I doubt it because that's

0:45:21.160 --> 0:45:22.960
<v Speaker 1>always going to go to like a quarterback. But but

0:45:23.000 --> 0:45:25.560
<v Speaker 1>he's played well playing that well, Yeah, there's there's gonna

0:45:25.560 --> 0:45:28.120
<v Speaker 1>be a tough, tough one there because the receiver for

0:45:28.160 --> 0:45:32.200
<v Speaker 1>the Bengals, Oh, he's getting there. Mac Jones. Mac Jones

0:45:32.239 --> 0:45:34.440
<v Speaker 1>has done a really good job too. Chase screwed Burrow

0:45:34.480 --> 0:45:37.360
<v Speaker 1>over yesterday. I'm mad at him. Drop the drop that

0:45:37.440 --> 0:45:40.520
<v Speaker 1>turned into a pick Hea MARII coopered him. If you

0:45:40.560 --> 0:45:44.160
<v Speaker 1>remember from the twenty nineteen Packers game. Yeah, if a

0:45:44.239 --> 0:45:46.319
<v Speaker 1>Marie catches that ball, I think they win that game.

0:45:46.560 --> 0:45:49.000
<v Speaker 1>That's one of you love you love Burrows more like

0:45:49.040 --> 0:45:51.200
<v Speaker 1>you can't you can't do anything to Burrows like you

0:45:52.000 --> 0:45:55.880
<v Speaker 1>there's no Burrow whatever. Yes, Joe Burrow must be protected

0:45:55.920 --> 0:45:59.680
<v Speaker 1>at all costs, even Jamar Chase, like nobody's nobody's free feeless.

0:45:59.800 --> 0:46:02.319
<v Speaker 1>I'm and the guy that that ran that whole thing.

0:46:02.320 --> 0:46:04.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, they're just gonna cut him in Carolina, like

0:46:04.200 --> 0:46:06.799
<v Speaker 1>hopefully he comes back to las U. Jeez, go y'all

0:46:06.800 --> 0:46:08.640
<v Speaker 1>could use it. Yeah, we couldn't want to give him

0:46:08.680 --> 0:46:12.000
<v Speaker 1>a better quarterback exactly, figure out the quarterback spot before

0:46:12.040 --> 0:46:14.759
<v Speaker 1>you just cutting him off like that. I com mad,

0:46:14.800 --> 0:46:16.920
<v Speaker 1>And I don't even know the guy, but I'm like, okay,

0:46:17.040 --> 0:46:19.960
<v Speaker 1>it's not like you didn't. Oh you couldn't fix Sam Darnel.

0:46:20.120 --> 0:46:23.000
<v Speaker 1>Who could? Hey, good point. All right, we're gonna say

0:46:23.000 --> 0:46:24.279
<v Speaker 1>our final break when we come back. We got some

0:46:24.320 --> 0:46:26.000
<v Speaker 1>questions from you guys. We'll hit Twitter and see what

0:46:26.040 --> 0:46:28.040
<v Speaker 1>we can come up with. There, we'll be back. This

0:46:28.040 --> 0:46:30.480
<v Speaker 1>is Dallascowboys that come radio. I want to use what

0:46:30.520 --> 0:46:33.840
<v Speaker 1>the pros use. How about the official men's skincare brand

0:46:33.880 --> 0:46:36.880
<v Speaker 1>or the Dallas Cowboys Jack Black. Right now, you can

0:46:36.920 --> 0:46:40.000
<v Speaker 1>get the Jack Black Starter, a curated collection of cowboys

0:46:40.000 --> 0:46:42.960
<v Speaker 1>locker room favorites, for just ten bucks with free shipping.

0:46:43.120 --> 0:46:46.200
<v Speaker 1>The starter includes four Jack Black skincare favorites plus a

0:46:46.239 --> 0:46:49.080
<v Speaker 1>full size and tense therapy lip bomb. Go to get

0:46:49.160 --> 0:46:51.960
<v Speaker 1>Jack Black dot com slash Cowboys and use the code

0:46:51.960 --> 0:46:55.520
<v Speaker 1>word team JB. That's get Jack Black dot com slash

0:46:55.560 --> 0:46:59.680
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys did Jack Black Starter ten bucks, free shipping at

0:46:59.680 --> 0:47:03.040
<v Speaker 1>eight and everyone new and existing customers get our best

0:47:03.040 --> 0:47:06.319
<v Speaker 1>deals on every smartphone. Why because you deserve it. We're

0:47:06.360 --> 0:47:08.560
<v Speaker 1>turning your living room into your office and your gym.

0:47:09.640 --> 0:47:12.720
<v Speaker 1>We're teaching Grandma had a video call and teaching her again.

0:47:12.880 --> 0:47:15.399
<v Speaker 1>It's the button on your left Nana, Okay, your other laughs.

0:47:16.520 --> 0:47:19.960
<v Speaker 1>It's not complicated. Everyone deserves something new, so ATNC has

0:47:20.000 --> 0:47:22.680
<v Speaker 1>given everyone new and existing customers are best deals with

0:47:22.719 --> 0:47:25.600
<v Speaker 1>every unlimited plan on every smartphone, even the latest ones.

0:47:25.680 --> 0:47:27.640
<v Speaker 1>A teen t may temporaries dated speci at the network

0:47:27.640 --> 0:47:30.200
<v Speaker 1>is specifical strictions and exceptions may apply. Hi, I'm Clint

0:47:30.200 --> 0:47:35.520
<v Speaker 1>Tillison and I'm Jay Novachek, and we're both with Turf,

0:47:35.680 --> 0:47:39.399
<v Speaker 1>the official tractor provider of the Dallas Cowboys. So if

0:47:39.440 --> 0:47:41.719
<v Speaker 1>you need a tractor to bail some hay, I'm more

0:47:41.760 --> 0:47:43.880
<v Speaker 1>to cut some grass or a gator to get some

0:47:44.000 --> 0:47:47.480
<v Speaker 1>chores done, Get a John Deer at Unitedagin Turf and

0:47:47.840 --> 0:47:50.600
<v Speaker 1>then let's get to work. Hey Jay, that's my line,

0:47:50.920 --> 0:47:53.680
<v Speaker 1>well not today. Get to work with a John Deer

0:47:53.760 --> 0:47:56.560
<v Speaker 1>tractor package that's just right for you and your budget.

0:47:56.640 --> 0:48:00.120
<v Speaker 1>Visit Unitedaginturf dot com. Before there was a draft. You

0:48:00.120 --> 0:48:03.000
<v Speaker 1>get sized up a cowboy by three simple factors. The

0:48:03.120 --> 0:48:05.200
<v Speaker 1>crease in his hat, the bend of his brim, and

0:48:05.280 --> 0:48:08.879
<v Speaker 1>his unbending attitude a man. Stetson didn't just protect him

0:48:08.880 --> 0:48:11.520
<v Speaker 1>from what life through at him. It projected a rugged,

0:48:11.760 --> 0:48:15.920
<v Speaker 1>unstoppable spirit. Stetson hats are still American made with pride.

0:48:16.000 --> 0:48:19.120
<v Speaker 1>Right here in Texas. There's still the unofficial crowd of

0:48:19.160 --> 0:48:22.480
<v Speaker 1>all self respecting cowboys, and Stetson is proud to be

0:48:22.560 --> 0:48:25.720
<v Speaker 1>on the field with America's team. Find a retailer nearest

0:48:25.719 --> 0:48:31.960
<v Speaker 1>to you at Stetson dot com. Slash Cowboys back to

0:48:32.040 --> 0:48:36.960
<v Speaker 1>the break. Hold on just a second. I'm gonna come

0:48:37.000 --> 0:48:39.280
<v Speaker 1>out with the best read ever. This one's coming from Esseler.

0:48:39.360 --> 0:48:42.280
<v Speaker 1>Whether you're watching from home or cheering in the stands

0:48:43.160 --> 0:48:47.720
<v Speaker 1>with Esseler lenses and this holiday season, you'll see every

0:48:47.719 --> 0:48:51.160
<v Speaker 1>exciting play book an appointment at your local experts and

0:48:51.280 --> 0:48:54.919
<v Speaker 1>find the perfect Esler lens for you. See More, Do More,

0:48:55.920 --> 0:48:59.120
<v Speaker 1>Welcome Back. Final segment of the braakelaf in SWBC Mortgage

0:48:59.120 --> 0:49:01.880
<v Speaker 1>Studios at the Starlist takes some questions. We got a

0:49:01.960 --> 0:49:05.839
<v Speaker 1>question here from Art Van Delay on Twitter. He says,

0:49:05.880 --> 0:49:08.480
<v Speaker 1>all across the league, when things break down, quarterbacks are

0:49:08.480 --> 0:49:12.359
<v Speaker 1>making plays with their legs. Dak before injury, averaged one

0:49:12.400 --> 0:49:15.040
<v Speaker 1>point six first down to a game with his legs.

0:49:15.440 --> 0:49:18.880
<v Speaker 1>This season, he only has two total. When the offense

0:49:18.960 --> 0:49:21.320
<v Speaker 1>is struggling to make first downs, should he look to

0:49:21.440 --> 0:49:24.919
<v Speaker 1>run more? Yeah, that's definitely an element that's been missing

0:49:25.000 --> 0:49:29.000
<v Speaker 1>from his game, And I think it was. He had

0:49:29.080 --> 0:49:31.160
<v Speaker 1>like a pretty nice scramble against the Giants, I think,

0:49:31.200 --> 0:49:33.160
<v Speaker 1>and it scared the crap out of everybody because it

0:49:33.239 --> 0:49:34.960
<v Speaker 1>was like a similar part of the field that's where

0:49:34.960 --> 0:49:38.920
<v Speaker 1>he got hurt. It certainly looks like he's got all

0:49:38.960 --> 0:49:41.520
<v Speaker 1>the same amount of mobility as he did before. And

0:49:41.800 --> 0:49:45.000
<v Speaker 1>people have asked about the calf injury. Football players are

0:49:45.000 --> 0:49:47.439
<v Speaker 1>always dealing with something, but like nothing about the way

0:49:47.440 --> 0:49:50.319
<v Speaker 1>that he's moved in any of these four games since

0:49:50.360 --> 0:49:54.520
<v Speaker 1>he came back leads me to believe that he's significantly

0:49:54.600 --> 0:49:58.640
<v Speaker 1>hampered by it. And so yes, the answers yes. And

0:49:58.680 --> 0:50:02.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if that's his own reluctance or you know,

0:50:02.680 --> 0:50:05.959
<v Speaker 1>organizational pressure like hey, you gotta be available, or maybe

0:50:05.960 --> 0:50:09.319
<v Speaker 1>a combination of all of the above, but it's a

0:50:09.400 --> 0:50:13.040
<v Speaker 1>useful element of his game that has been lacking. Yeah,

0:50:13.080 --> 0:50:15.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, he said everyone said it in the offseason.

0:50:16.040 --> 0:50:18.000
<v Speaker 1>He's got to be smart about it. He's gonna got

0:50:18.080 --> 0:50:20.120
<v Speaker 1>to run some he's you know, and this is what

0:50:20.200 --> 0:50:23.120
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing him being smart about it. That's what that's

0:50:23.120 --> 0:50:26.800
<v Speaker 1>what that is. He's not running as much. I definitely

0:50:26.800 --> 0:50:29.040
<v Speaker 1>believe it has something to do with what happened last

0:50:29.120 --> 0:50:32.960
<v Speaker 1>year that costs the team. That didn't cost him anything

0:50:33.120 --> 0:50:35.560
<v Speaker 1>money wise, but that costs the team. The team wasn't

0:50:35.600 --> 0:50:37.439
<v Speaker 1>the same. He knows that he's got to be there

0:50:37.480 --> 0:50:40.920
<v Speaker 1>for his team. So it's a it's a tough balance.

0:50:40.960 --> 0:50:43.040
<v Speaker 1>It's not easy to sit there and say that that's

0:50:43.040 --> 0:50:45.879
<v Speaker 1>a good and to be fair, I mean, he ran

0:50:45.960 --> 0:50:48.160
<v Speaker 1>for a touchdown against Atlanta. He bowled a guy over.

0:50:48.280 --> 0:50:50.560
<v Speaker 1>It's not like I don't think he's like afraid to run.

0:50:50.880 --> 0:50:53.400
<v Speaker 1>I just think that probably weighs heavily on you. I know,

0:50:54.360 --> 0:50:56.840
<v Speaker 1>he was getting killed on Twitter. It was the first

0:50:56.920 --> 0:50:59.160
<v Speaker 1>series of the Saints game. He had like an open

0:50:59.200 --> 0:51:02.000
<v Speaker 1>pocket of grass on the left side and he scrambled

0:51:02.000 --> 0:51:05.560
<v Speaker 1>and he threw it instead, and everybody was yelling at

0:51:05.600 --> 0:51:08.200
<v Speaker 1>him that he didn't run. And from where we were sitting,

0:51:09.000 --> 0:51:11.400
<v Speaker 1>I was like, okay, there's like an end tailing the play,

0:51:11.400 --> 0:51:15.240
<v Speaker 1>and two linebackers sick, like maybe he gets four yards,

0:51:15.320 --> 0:51:18.760
<v Speaker 1>Like maybe he gets five or six best case scenario,

0:51:18.840 --> 0:51:21.600
<v Speaker 1>and he's probably gonna take a shot. Is it worth it?

0:51:21.680 --> 0:51:24.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if he gets concussed doing that, is that

0:51:25.040 --> 0:51:27.319
<v Speaker 1>was that worth it? So yeah, that's a tough spot

0:51:27.320 --> 0:51:28.400
<v Speaker 1>to be in. Yeah, And if you go back and

0:51:28.440 --> 0:51:30.919
<v Speaker 1>watch that New Orleans game, you'll notice that there were

0:51:31.000 --> 0:51:33.719
<v Speaker 1>quite a few plays, especially on those third downs, when

0:51:33.760 --> 0:51:36.120
<v Speaker 1>they were spying deck, like they literally had a lineback

0:51:36.160 --> 0:51:37.919
<v Speaker 1>staying right in the middle of field, waiting to see

0:51:37.920 --> 0:51:40.239
<v Speaker 1>if he tried to take off. And I mean that

0:51:40.360 --> 0:51:42.960
<v Speaker 1>speaks to the fact that other teams, I think recognize

0:51:43.000 --> 0:51:45.360
<v Speaker 1>that in those critical downs he can be a problem

0:51:45.400 --> 0:51:47.319
<v Speaker 1>with his legs. Now, Dad's not the kind of guy

0:51:47.400 --> 0:51:49.440
<v Speaker 1>you know you got Lamar Jackson. Even if you got

0:51:49.480 --> 0:51:52.240
<v Speaker 1>somebody spying him, he's gonna make some opportunities out of running.

0:51:52.280 --> 0:51:55.000
<v Speaker 1>That's not dak. Dad can run when nobody's paying attention,

0:51:55.200 --> 0:51:56.920
<v Speaker 1>and now he can pick up some yards from it.

0:51:57.120 --> 0:51:59.000
<v Speaker 1>But you got a guy spying him, Dad's not going

0:51:59.040 --> 0:52:00.520
<v Speaker 1>to get a lot out of that. That's not a

0:52:01.239 --> 0:52:05.120
<v Speaker 1>particularly fast or elusive runner. He's a powerful runner, but

0:52:05.120 --> 0:52:08.080
<v Speaker 1>he's not a particularly fast or elusive runner. So when

0:52:08.120 --> 0:52:09.480
<v Speaker 1>it all comes down to it, I just don't think

0:52:09.480 --> 0:52:11.919
<v Speaker 1>he's had as many opportunities. I do think there's sometimes

0:52:11.960 --> 0:52:13.799
<v Speaker 1>he's been a little hesitant, but I also think there

0:52:13.800 --> 0:52:16.160
<v Speaker 1>are sometimes you're recently when teams are basically saying you're

0:52:16.160 --> 0:52:17.840
<v Speaker 1>not going to do that to us on specific downs,

0:52:17.920 --> 0:52:19.560
<v Speaker 1>You're gonna have to throw the ball if you're gonna

0:52:19.560 --> 0:52:22.239
<v Speaker 1>get this first down. I definitely I don't think that's

0:52:22.280 --> 0:52:24.880
<v Speaker 1>the reason why the offense has been kind of herky

0:52:24.960 --> 0:52:27.680
<v Speaker 1>jerky recently. I mean, he hasn't really been doing it

0:52:27.719 --> 0:52:31.920
<v Speaker 1>all year and they were rolling. But there's but there's

0:52:31.960 --> 0:52:33.960
<v Speaker 1>stats out there from his whole career that when he

0:52:34.040 --> 0:52:36.520
<v Speaker 1>runs like it's like thirty yards, it's not why it's like, no,

0:52:36.719 --> 0:52:39.720
<v Speaker 1>thirty yards are more. They're way better than he doesn't.

0:52:39.760 --> 0:52:42.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if if he runs three times for fifteen yards,

0:52:42.760 --> 0:52:45.319
<v Speaker 1>two of those probably picked up first downs, and that's

0:52:45.320 --> 0:52:49.640
<v Speaker 1>the difference between converting thirty percent and converting you know,

0:52:49.760 --> 0:52:53.120
<v Speaker 1>sixty five percent or whatever. So I don't want to

0:52:53.160 --> 0:52:55.680
<v Speaker 1>overstate it, but I do think it's it's a useful

0:52:55.680 --> 0:52:57.480
<v Speaker 1>thing that he just hasn't been doing this. There's been

0:52:57.480 --> 0:52:59.880
<v Speaker 1>a quarterback he's not no longer here, and he's not

0:53:00.120 --> 0:53:02.240
<v Speaker 1>he didn't start a lot of games for the Cowboys,

0:53:02.280 --> 0:53:05.319
<v Speaker 1>So it's not who you think. But he said before, well,

0:53:05.440 --> 0:53:07.080
<v Speaker 1>why would you run when you can throw it? That

0:53:07.400 --> 0:53:12.680
<v Speaker 1>doesn't help your quarterback rating. I mean it's gonna help

0:53:12.680 --> 0:53:15.040
<v Speaker 1>your quarterback. It doesn't help your quarterback rating to get

0:53:15.040 --> 0:53:17.280
<v Speaker 1>twelve yards, whether you can throw it, complete the pass

0:53:17.280 --> 0:53:20.439
<v Speaker 1>and get twelve yards and that helps your rating. I'm

0:53:20.480 --> 0:53:23.319
<v Speaker 1>just saying, like, well, like people say that kind of stuff,

0:53:23.360 --> 0:53:24.920
<v Speaker 1>and I don't I don't know if that's right. I

0:53:24.920 --> 0:53:26.920
<v Speaker 1>don't think that. I don't. I don't think he's that.

0:53:26.960 --> 0:53:29.920
<v Speaker 1>We hit all in twenty twenty one. We have EPA too,

0:53:29.960 --> 0:53:32.719
<v Speaker 1>So there's ways we can I'm sorry, what is that?

0:53:34.480 --> 0:53:36.840
<v Speaker 1>We can talk about it off the air, but you

0:53:36.880 --> 0:53:39.640
<v Speaker 1>can quantify a quarterbacks rushing ability in twenty twenty one.

0:53:39.680 --> 0:53:41.400
<v Speaker 1>It should be to me, that should be a part

0:53:41.440 --> 0:53:43.440
<v Speaker 1>of your right. Absolutely, it should be. It's like, oh,

0:53:43.520 --> 0:53:47.760
<v Speaker 1>Lamar Jackson's twenty third or whatever. It's like, Okay, who's

0:53:47.880 --> 0:53:50.759
<v Speaker 1>who's worried about him at night? You know? Defensive coordinators?

0:53:50.760 --> 0:53:53.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean, every team's about to play, right, so that matters.

0:53:53.960 --> 0:53:55.680
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's take a question for Brian. I'm going

0:53:55.760 --> 0:53:58.239
<v Speaker 1>to change this question a little bit. He's asking what

0:53:58.320 --> 0:54:00.840
<v Speaker 1>are the highest positions of need he wants to go

0:54:00.880 --> 0:54:03.560
<v Speaker 1>to draft. I don't think we talked about draft just

0:54:03.680 --> 0:54:05.480
<v Speaker 1>in general. Like if you look at this team, we

0:54:05.480 --> 0:54:07.959
<v Speaker 1>talked a little about lineback, we talked about offensive line.

0:54:08.239 --> 0:54:10.880
<v Speaker 1>Give me specifically, like, what are the positions where you

0:54:10.880 --> 0:54:14.320
<v Speaker 1>think Dallas really needs some help? Man, they're gonna be sitting.

0:54:15.800 --> 0:54:17.919
<v Speaker 1>I don't like to do that where they're sitting, but

0:54:18.120 --> 0:54:21.800
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna be in the They're gonna be past twenty

0:54:21.800 --> 0:54:26.799
<v Speaker 1>five probably, Oh god, they'll twenty two to thirty two.

0:54:26.880 --> 0:54:30.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, all right. I mean, anybody other than

0:54:30.200 --> 0:54:34.000
<v Speaker 1>a quarterback should be on the table. Don't you think

0:54:34.880 --> 0:54:38.160
<v Speaker 1>anybody tight end? Well, what if it was a tight end,

0:54:38.280 --> 0:54:40.400
<v Speaker 1>a pretty good tight end. Yeah, you think about this,

0:54:40.760 --> 0:54:43.719
<v Speaker 1>left tackle, So do you think about it? Center guard? Yes,

0:54:44.200 --> 0:54:47.640
<v Speaker 1>running back. I think you should take a running back

0:54:47.640 --> 0:54:49.880
<v Speaker 1>every year in the first four rounds. In my opinion,

0:54:49.880 --> 0:54:52.319
<v Speaker 1>that's just first. I think that's in one of the

0:54:52.320 --> 0:54:54.839
<v Speaker 1>first one of your first four round picks. I would

0:54:54.880 --> 0:54:57.120
<v Speaker 1>take a running back at least every other year, Okay,

0:54:57.360 --> 0:54:59.759
<v Speaker 1>I absolute would, because you're because about the likelihood is

0:55:00.000 --> 0:55:01.720
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna get one of those start a fourth round players.

0:55:01.719 --> 0:55:03.879
<v Speaker 1>It turned into a really good running back. But those

0:55:03.920 --> 0:55:06.080
<v Speaker 1>guys too, they tend they don't tend to have long careers.

0:55:06.200 --> 0:55:07.759
<v Speaker 1>You give them four or five years and you ready

0:55:07.800 --> 0:55:09.799
<v Speaker 1>for the next, so you always want to keep recycling

0:55:09.800 --> 0:55:11.880
<v Speaker 1>them through. I don't think you go high with the

0:55:11.880 --> 0:55:15.040
<v Speaker 1>pick running back. No. I was thinking lower, honestly, like

0:55:15.239 --> 0:55:18.279
<v Speaker 1>fifth round, six round. Yeah, but that's fine. I just

0:55:18.320 --> 0:55:20.600
<v Speaker 1>think every position should be on it. Now let's let's

0:55:20.880 --> 0:55:25.120
<v Speaker 1>let's get a little bit more pressing. I mean, okay,

0:55:25.600 --> 0:55:29.160
<v Speaker 1>let's think about and then and then get quiet like well,

0:55:29.160 --> 0:55:30.839
<v Speaker 1>I thought he was about to say, well, let's think

0:55:30.880 --> 0:55:34.600
<v Speaker 1>about that one of the draft guy interior interior offensive

0:55:34.600 --> 0:55:37.480
<v Speaker 1>line is something that you could look at a because

0:55:37.480 --> 0:55:41.160
<v Speaker 1>of contract situations and be because you're not getting elite

0:55:41.239 --> 0:55:42.839
<v Speaker 1>level play out of a few of them. I can

0:55:42.960 --> 0:55:45.760
<v Speaker 1>see which I also would make it a the value

0:55:45.800 --> 0:55:48.040
<v Speaker 1>that you get at guards center y number twenty three,

0:55:48.120 --> 0:55:50.120
<v Speaker 1>twenty four, you're talking about one of the better ones there.

0:55:50.239 --> 0:55:53.040
<v Speaker 1>The problem the cow The Cowboys are too good probably

0:55:53.160 --> 0:55:55.800
<v Speaker 1>to have a shot at the Iowa Center that everybody's

0:55:55.840 --> 0:56:00.160
<v Speaker 1>gotta about. But that would be fun um linebacker. I think.

0:56:00.200 --> 0:56:01.839
<v Speaker 1>I know that sounds weird, but we kind of talked

0:56:01.840 --> 0:56:04.200
<v Speaker 1>about it in the first segment, especially if Mica is

0:56:04.239 --> 0:56:06.279
<v Speaker 1>gonna kind of freelance, which I want him to do.

0:56:06.719 --> 0:56:09.400
<v Speaker 1>Jabril Cox is there, but we're not one hundred percent

0:56:09.440 --> 0:56:12.359
<v Speaker 1>sure what they have. So yeah, I think they need

0:56:12.360 --> 0:56:14.239
<v Speaker 1>to draft a linebacker in the top one hundred picks

0:56:14.239 --> 0:56:17.000
<v Speaker 1>next year because I'm I'm not resigning Layton and probably

0:56:17.040 --> 0:56:21.080
<v Speaker 1>not Keano that's just me. Safety jay Ron Curse is great.

0:56:21.320 --> 0:56:24.080
<v Speaker 1>He might price himself out of here. Honestly, that's something

0:56:24.120 --> 0:56:26.680
<v Speaker 1>you gotta consider. But I would I would pay for

0:56:26.719 --> 0:56:29.439
<v Speaker 1>it to keep him. What what what if you don't

0:56:29.440 --> 0:56:31.279
<v Speaker 1>know the price? I mean, what if it means Yeah,

0:56:31.280 --> 0:56:32.840
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna get it. He's gonna get more money he

0:56:32.840 --> 0:56:34.920
<v Speaker 1>would have gotten last year than he got last year.

0:56:35.239 --> 0:56:36.879
<v Speaker 1>But I don't think he's at a point now where

0:56:36.880 --> 0:56:38.440
<v Speaker 1>people are like, oh my god, we got to make

0:56:38.520 --> 0:56:40.800
<v Speaker 1>him the highest paid safety in the league on one production.

0:56:40.920 --> 0:56:43.200
<v Speaker 1>So I think I think it's gonna be more, and

0:56:43.280 --> 0:56:48.080
<v Speaker 1>I would be comfortable with paying him more. Let's see

0:56:48.120 --> 0:56:50.120
<v Speaker 1>what else you got. I would rather even though he's

0:56:50.120 --> 0:56:52.719
<v Speaker 1>playing linebacker. I would rather first out what I'm gonna

0:56:52.719 --> 0:56:54.200
<v Speaker 1>do with Randy because I might have to franchise when

0:56:54.239 --> 0:56:56.759
<v Speaker 1>I got it, I got the tag from ninety four.

0:56:57.160 --> 0:57:00.319
<v Speaker 1>But he's he's gonna be here on end and could

0:57:00.320 --> 0:57:02.399
<v Speaker 1>be again. What's gonna happen with Michael, What's gonna happen

0:57:02.440 --> 0:57:08.840
<v Speaker 1>with Randy? What's gonna happen with Tank? Keep getting rushers

0:57:05.200 --> 0:57:11.880
<v Speaker 1>us unrestricted? About how many guys would you say are

0:57:11.920 --> 0:57:14.600
<v Speaker 1>about to become free agents? I mean any in any

0:57:14.640 --> 0:57:16.919
<v Speaker 1>given year. It's between like eighteen. They got some guys

0:57:16.920 --> 0:57:18.640
<v Speaker 1>that are actual players that are going to be free

0:57:18.640 --> 0:57:20.640
<v Speaker 1>atives this year. That's the interesting part about it. I

0:57:20.640 --> 0:57:26.720
<v Speaker 1>mean yeah, I mean yeah, Randy Schultz, Gallop, Connor, Shoot.

0:57:27.760 --> 0:57:29.480
<v Speaker 1>People probably don't want to hear me say this. I'd

0:57:29.520 --> 0:57:31.840
<v Speaker 1>draft a receiver highly. Just keep that thing, keep a

0:57:31.880 --> 0:57:35.200
<v Speaker 1>strength to strength. I'm not saying first round, but if

0:57:35.200 --> 0:57:36.680
<v Speaker 1>you get one, if you find one that you really

0:57:36.720 --> 0:57:38.400
<v Speaker 1>like in the second, third round, I wouldn't be against.

0:57:38.480 --> 0:57:41.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Michael Gallup was pick eighty one and he

0:57:41.160 --> 0:57:43.480
<v Speaker 1>had a decent rookie year, but it took him time

0:57:43.520 --> 0:57:46.000
<v Speaker 1>to get going. Like you can't wait until it's a

0:57:46.080 --> 0:57:48.360
<v Speaker 1>drastic need. At least you shouldn't not if you're doing

0:57:48.360 --> 0:57:50.280
<v Speaker 1>your job the right way. That's also why the offensive

0:57:50.320 --> 0:57:52.160
<v Speaker 1>line is so critical, I think is because they have

0:57:52.280 --> 0:57:54.840
<v Speaker 1>waited I think a little too long to now start

0:57:54.840 --> 0:57:57.040
<v Speaker 1>because now they got to rebuild this thing. Because you

0:57:57.080 --> 0:57:59.200
<v Speaker 1>know a lot of these guys that I would go

0:57:59.280 --> 0:58:02.960
<v Speaker 1>first and second round. Honestly, you keep rebuilding that. Yeah,

0:58:03.200 --> 0:58:07.800
<v Speaker 1>then then your fifth round running back is still effective

0:58:08.160 --> 0:58:10.600
<v Speaker 1>In a system like this, you can find that I

0:58:10.760 --> 0:58:12.760
<v Speaker 1>want to say Joseph Randall. But Joseph Randall was a

0:58:12.760 --> 0:58:15.360
<v Speaker 1>fifth round back and he wasn't bad. Tony Pollard is

0:58:15.360 --> 0:58:18.480
<v Speaker 1>a fourth round pick. That's awesome. You can get good bad,

0:58:18.480 --> 0:58:19.880
<v Speaker 1>and that's my thing about backs, like you can. Just

0:58:20.280 --> 0:58:22.240
<v Speaker 1>that's why I always in drafting ones because I just

0:58:22.280 --> 0:58:23.920
<v Speaker 1>want to keep them in the pipeline. But if you

0:58:24.000 --> 0:58:26.480
<v Speaker 1>got that line, build it with that exactly right. Yeah,

0:58:26.560 --> 0:58:30.800
<v Speaker 1>I are center, an offensive lineman and a off ball

0:58:30.880 --> 0:58:34.760
<v Speaker 1>linebacker are right now and that it'll obviously change, but

0:58:34.800 --> 0:58:37.040
<v Speaker 1>that's what I think about. And throw safety in there

0:58:37.080 --> 0:58:39.080
<v Speaker 1>just because that's what we do. Everything is stressful. I

0:58:39.080 --> 0:58:42.080
<v Speaker 1>think I hate that time of the year because it's

0:58:42.160 --> 0:58:45.480
<v Speaker 1>so stressful. It's like it's easy when it's a bad area.

0:58:45.720 --> 0:58:47.920
<v Speaker 1>This is why I do this job. That's my favorite

0:58:47.960 --> 0:58:49.960
<v Speaker 1>thing to talk about. Yeah, so, well, when you lose

0:58:50.000 --> 0:58:53.080
<v Speaker 1>guys are decent, you're like God, and now we got

0:58:53.080 --> 0:58:55.520
<v Speaker 1>to rebuild this whole thing because it's easy. When you're

0:58:55.560 --> 0:58:58.640
<v Speaker 1>losing guys that suck, it's like, okay, we can. Here's

0:58:59.000 --> 0:59:01.600
<v Speaker 1>here's why mock drafts can be kind of tricky. People

0:59:01.600 --> 0:59:03.720
<v Speaker 1>like to get on the mock drafts and they're always

0:59:03.720 --> 0:59:07.040
<v Speaker 1>done by somebody you've never heard of. I looked at

0:59:07.040 --> 0:59:09.640
<v Speaker 1>three mock drafts the other day, mainly for different reasons.

0:59:09.640 --> 0:59:11.440
<v Speaker 1>I was trying to see where certain players are going

0:59:11.480 --> 0:59:15.040
<v Speaker 1>to be, players that I follow. But they all have

0:59:15.120 --> 0:59:17.880
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys taking a corner because they wanted a corner

0:59:17.960 --> 0:59:20.840
<v Speaker 1>last year and they didn't get one, so they obviously

0:59:20.840 --> 0:59:23.600
<v Speaker 1>want one now. And the narrative on Drown is that

0:59:23.760 --> 0:59:25.920
<v Speaker 1>he ain't that great Anthony Brown. Yeah, I'm sure that's

0:59:25.920 --> 0:59:28.959
<v Speaker 1>the narrative. Yeah, I mean, he's not He's not that great,

0:59:29.240 --> 0:59:31.520
<v Speaker 1>but they're not great. The narrative is wrong. Good, The

0:59:31.640 --> 0:59:33.960
<v Speaker 1>narrative is wrong. There's a narrative that he is a

0:59:33.960 --> 0:59:37.120
<v Speaker 1>bad cornerback. He's not a bad corner, and he's not great.

0:59:37.160 --> 0:59:39.360
<v Speaker 1>And in this world, everybody wants to find you know,

0:59:39.520 --> 0:59:42.440
<v Speaker 1>plug holes, digs, is this and that, Joe. But I mean,

0:59:42.560 --> 0:59:44.600
<v Speaker 1>and they could take a corner if there's one that's there.

0:59:44.600 --> 0:59:46.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean, why not you always want to take a corner.

0:59:46.360 --> 0:59:47.880
<v Speaker 1>But I don't know if it's this pressing of a

0:59:47.960 --> 0:59:51.280
<v Speaker 1>need and that draft second and third rounder and hoping

0:59:51.320 --> 0:59:53.160
<v Speaker 1>that they would play something they haven't yet. Even the

0:59:53.280 --> 0:59:58.400
<v Speaker 1>really informed draft gurus only have time to keep like

0:59:58.440 --> 1:00:00.960
<v Speaker 1>a surface level in my They don't know the ins

1:00:01.000 --> 1:00:02.840
<v Speaker 1>and outs of every roster the way that we do.

1:00:03.160 --> 1:00:05.560
<v Speaker 1>But I would if the right corner felt to me

1:00:05.600 --> 1:00:08.080
<v Speaker 1>in the first round, I would do it anyway I don't. Yeah, yeah,

1:00:08.080 --> 1:00:10.600
<v Speaker 1>But that goes back to the original point is there

1:00:10.600 --> 1:00:12.480
<v Speaker 1>are a lot of There are a lot of positions

1:00:12.520 --> 1:00:14.280
<v Speaker 1>here where if you could upgrade the position, you take it.

1:00:14.400 --> 1:00:16.400
<v Speaker 1>There are very few rere like I just wouldn't take it.

1:00:16.400 --> 1:00:18.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't care who the players. I'm just not taking

1:00:18.280 --> 1:00:21.480
<v Speaker 1>a player at that position, quarterbacks, really it Other than that,

1:00:21.760 --> 1:00:24.040
<v Speaker 1>you're probably taking a guy if he's a better player

1:00:24.080 --> 1:00:26.560
<v Speaker 1>than other position. They resigned Michael Gallup and they have

1:00:26.800 --> 1:00:29.080
<v Speaker 1>that receiver, those three, I doubt you would do that.

1:00:29.160 --> 1:00:31.280
<v Speaker 1>You're not gonna do that if you resign Gallup. If

1:00:31.280 --> 1:00:32.760
<v Speaker 1>you resign gall If, you're not going to take a

1:00:32.760 --> 1:00:34.960
<v Speaker 1>receiver in the first round. He just can't help you

1:00:35.000 --> 1:00:38.960
<v Speaker 1>as much as some other position I would throw. I

1:00:39.000 --> 1:00:41.080
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't draft a running back in the first round. Yeah,

1:00:41.080 --> 1:00:43.000
<v Speaker 1>if any time after that, that's fine, but not in

1:00:43.000 --> 1:00:44.960
<v Speaker 1>the first round. Not. I think I've done enough of that.

1:00:45.200 --> 1:00:48.680
<v Speaker 1>Just yeah, and I mean, I mean, Zeek's not going anywhere,

1:00:48.840 --> 1:00:50.680
<v Speaker 1>and I don't know what's going to happen. Tony does

1:00:50.720 --> 1:00:52.800
<v Speaker 1>still have one more year, so I mean you can

1:00:53.080 --> 1:00:55.400
<v Speaker 1>and if there is if there's one position where you

1:00:55.440 --> 1:00:58.400
<v Speaker 1>can wait until it's critical, it's running back, especially like

1:00:58.400 --> 1:01:00.200
<v Speaker 1>we said, if the offensive line is good, if the

1:01:00.280 --> 1:01:04.160
<v Speaker 1>quarterbacks could whatever, draft Alvin Kamara in the third round

1:01:04.200 --> 1:01:06.560
<v Speaker 1>and have him be Rookie of the year immediately. Perfect,

1:01:06.640 --> 1:01:08.440
<v Speaker 1>It's exactly right. All right. We appreciate you guys. You

1:01:08.440 --> 1:01:10.240
<v Speaker 1>want to sweep back Tomorrow, We're gonna take some more questions.

1:01:10.280 --> 1:01:12.280
<v Speaker 1>You guys hit us up on Twitter. You're welcome. Hopefully

1:01:12.320 --> 1:01:15.160
<v Speaker 1>we'll get some more calls, some calls tomorrow during the

1:01:15.160 --> 1:01:17.160
<v Speaker 1>show till then for Nick Even, Dave helm and Amber Garcia.

1:01:17.200 --> 1:01:19.439
<v Speaker 1>I'm Derrek Hielton. This has been The Break live on

1:01:19.600 --> 1:01:24.600
<v Speaker 1>Dallas Cowboys dot Com Radio. This has been a production

1:01:24.680 --> 1:01:28.400
<v Speaker 1>of Dallas Cowboys dot Com and the Dallas Cowboys Football Club.