WEBVTT - The Story of Internet Explorer, Part 1

0:00:04.200 --> 0:00:08.119
<v Speaker 1>Get in touch with technology with tex stuff dot com.

0:00:12.240 --> 0:00:16.120
<v Speaker 1>Hey there, and welcome to tex Stuff. I'm Jonathan Strickland,

0:00:16.160 --> 0:00:19.360
<v Speaker 1>and today I have a special guest host, a friend

0:00:19.400 --> 0:00:23.000
<v Speaker 1>of mine from way back. He is currently the senior

0:00:23.120 --> 0:00:25.919
<v Speaker 1>editor over at Bloomberg, not not the a senior editor.

0:00:25.960 --> 0:00:29.000
<v Speaker 1>His title actually, or his role is very specific. I'm

0:00:29.000 --> 0:00:31.040
<v Speaker 1>going to introduce him and let him say what his

0:00:31.160 --> 0:00:34.159
<v Speaker 1>role is, because otherwise I will muck it up. Nate Lankson,

0:00:34.440 --> 0:00:37.040
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to tex Stuff. Thank you very much. Yes, the

0:00:37.400 --> 0:00:40.879
<v Speaker 1>joyous difference between job title and job role senior editor Bloomberg.

0:00:40.880 --> 0:00:43.760
<v Speaker 1>But I'm actually running to just ledatorial for Europe, Middle East,

0:00:43.800 --> 0:00:48.440
<v Speaker 1>in Africa. It's a long devotion, Yeah, Nate, Nate's he's

0:00:48.440 --> 0:00:50.640
<v Speaker 1>got a lot of responsibility on his shoulders doing a

0:00:50.960 --> 0:00:53.880
<v Speaker 1>bang up job too. And uh and Nate and I

0:00:53.920 --> 0:00:57.040
<v Speaker 1>know each other from several years. Actually we we both

0:00:57.080 --> 0:01:01.440
<v Speaker 1>started as as fans of c net and buzz out

0:01:01.440 --> 0:01:04.480
<v Speaker 1>Loud and then um Nate went on to work for

0:01:04.520 --> 0:01:06.839
<v Speaker 1>Senet and then b Wired and now works at Bloomberg.

0:01:06.920 --> 0:01:11.000
<v Speaker 1>And through it all he has he has patiently endured

0:01:11.080 --> 0:01:16.240
<v Speaker 1>my friendship, so I appreciate that and and your many podcasts,

0:01:16.880 --> 0:01:20.199
<v Speaker 1>you know, a podcast a podcast listener as well as contributor.

0:01:20.600 --> 0:01:23.200
<v Speaker 1>And it's amazing that this is the first time I've

0:01:23.240 --> 0:01:25.479
<v Speaker 1>ever had you as a guest on this show. Because

0:01:25.520 --> 0:01:28.080
<v Speaker 1>we've known each other for so long and uh and

0:01:28.080 --> 0:01:30.720
<v Speaker 1>and our interests are so aligned. We've talked a lot

0:01:30.840 --> 0:01:33.959
<v Speaker 1>about collaborating. A part of the issue is that Nate

0:01:34.560 --> 0:01:39.280
<v Speaker 1>has this irritating habit of being English, so he there's

0:01:39.280 --> 0:01:42.920
<v Speaker 1>a there's a five or sometimes six hour time difference

0:01:42.920 --> 0:01:47.920
<v Speaker 1>between us. Yes, bloody marvelous, isn't it be wonderful? If

0:01:48.560 --> 0:01:52.080
<v Speaker 1>bright Well, my fans will love it because now there's

0:01:52.120 --> 0:01:54.560
<v Speaker 1>someone who has a true English accent as opposed to

0:01:54.640 --> 0:01:58.880
<v Speaker 1>the the one I sometimes attempt and and and mangle

0:01:58.920 --> 0:02:02.480
<v Speaker 1>along the way. And Nate is joining me to talk

0:02:02.680 --> 0:02:07.000
<v Speaker 1>about Internet Explorer, and the reason why we're talking about

0:02:07.040 --> 0:02:09.760
<v Speaker 1>it is that it's a web browser has a very

0:02:09.760 --> 0:02:13.799
<v Speaker 1>long history, and that history now seems to have an

0:02:13.880 --> 0:02:17.560
<v Speaker 1>end cap to it because Microsoft appears to be leaving

0:02:17.560 --> 0:02:22.520
<v Speaker 1>Internet Explorer behind and embracing a new product that currently

0:02:22.600 --> 0:02:26.840
<v Speaker 1>is codenamed Projects Spartan, but we'll probably have some different

0:02:26.919 --> 0:02:30.400
<v Speaker 1>name once it actually goes live. So we're going to

0:02:30.440 --> 0:02:37.639
<v Speaker 1>cover the dramatic history that's filled with uh tons of

0:02:37.800 --> 0:02:42.080
<v Speaker 1>interesting stories, as it turns out. And to really get started,

0:02:42.120 --> 0:02:44.800
<v Speaker 1>we have to turn the clock back before there was

0:02:44.880 --> 0:02:48.679
<v Speaker 1>ever any web browsers at all, at the birth of

0:02:48.720 --> 0:02:51.400
<v Speaker 1>the first web browser, which we can trace back to

0:02:51.600 --> 0:03:00.960
<v Speaker 1>Christmas Day, December nineteen wo M C M X see

0:03:01.120 --> 0:03:06.640
<v Speaker 1>as the Romans right, I'm glad you took that. Whenever

0:03:06.680 --> 0:03:09.040
<v Speaker 1>I start thinking about Roman numerals, I have to start

0:03:09.080 --> 0:03:12.760
<v Speaker 1>dialing I X I I uh, which only makes sense

0:03:12.840 --> 0:03:17.959
<v Speaker 1>for the listeners here in America. Um So, Tim berners

0:03:18.040 --> 0:03:22.040
<v Speaker 1>Lee was working at at CERN, same people who are

0:03:22.240 --> 0:03:28.360
<v Speaker 1>responsible for the Large Hadron Collider, and had developed a

0:03:28.680 --> 0:03:32.120
<v Speaker 1>program that would allow for the retrieval and display of

0:03:32.200 --> 0:03:36.080
<v Speaker 1>information UH in a way that would make sense, make

0:03:36.120 --> 0:03:39.200
<v Speaker 1>it easy to navigate. This would become the first web browser,

0:03:39.400 --> 0:03:42.040
<v Speaker 1>which is kind of funny because without the web browser,

0:03:42.080 --> 0:03:44.400
<v Speaker 1>you really don't have a worldwide Web. You definitely had

0:03:44.440 --> 0:03:48.559
<v Speaker 1>an Internet because the Internet is a network of networks

0:03:48.560 --> 0:03:51.800
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of people I realize maybe this isn't

0:03:51.840 --> 0:03:53.120
<v Speaker 1>as bad as it used to be, but a lot

0:03:53.200 --> 0:03:57.680
<v Speaker 1>of people often will say web and mean Internet or

0:03:57.760 --> 0:04:02.240
<v Speaker 1>vice versa. They'll use the terms changeably I've described it

0:04:02.240 --> 0:04:03.920
<v Speaker 1>in the past. Touch of the two people who get

0:04:03.920 --> 0:04:07.200
<v Speaker 1>this wrong as the Web is the car on the

0:04:07.280 --> 0:04:11.160
<v Speaker 1>highway that is the internet, right. They they are the

0:04:11.240 --> 0:04:14.160
<v Speaker 1>websites on top of the net, right, And there are

0:04:14.160 --> 0:04:18.080
<v Speaker 1>other vehicles on that same highway. Right. Because the email

0:04:18.120 --> 0:04:21.479
<v Speaker 1>does not have to be web based uh FTP, you know,

0:04:21.560 --> 0:04:25.039
<v Speaker 1>file transfer protocol, other protocols. Um. In fact, the way

0:04:25.120 --> 0:04:28.279
<v Speaker 1>I originally really made use of the Internet back in

0:04:28.320 --> 0:04:31.279
<v Speaker 1>the day was through the tel net chat client. I

0:04:31.400 --> 0:04:33.800
<v Speaker 1>used that a lot when I was in college as

0:04:33.839 --> 0:04:36.520
<v Speaker 1>a way of distracting myself and making friends with people

0:04:37.000 --> 0:04:40.240
<v Speaker 1>who were more into the same things I was into.

0:04:40.360 --> 0:04:42.440
<v Speaker 1>I went to for the first two years of my

0:04:42.480 --> 0:04:46.640
<v Speaker 1>schooling a small community college in rural Georgia, and a

0:04:46.640 --> 0:04:49.280
<v Speaker 1>lot of the people I was around didn't share the

0:04:49.320 --> 0:04:51.720
<v Speaker 1>same interests I did, so telling it was one of

0:04:51.760 --> 0:04:55.000
<v Speaker 1>those things that allowed me to go beyond that. But

0:04:55.080 --> 0:04:59.760
<v Speaker 1>that was before I had ever heard of the World

0:04:59.800 --> 0:05:04.719
<v Speaker 1>Wide Web and web browsers UM. So we have to

0:05:04.760 --> 0:05:07.640
<v Speaker 1>remember that this time before there were browsers there, there

0:05:08.000 --> 0:05:11.560
<v Speaker 1>were there were not really any user friendly ways of

0:05:11.640 --> 0:05:15.279
<v Speaker 1>accessing information. You kind of had to really dive into

0:05:15.440 --> 0:05:20.520
<v Speaker 1>the tech and understand commands in order to get anything

0:05:20.560 --> 0:05:23.040
<v Speaker 1>out of it. Even if those commands were fairly simple,

0:05:23.200 --> 0:05:26.440
<v Speaker 1>it was an high enough barrier of entry that there

0:05:26.440 --> 0:05:28.320
<v Speaker 1>were only a few of us playing in that in

0:05:28.400 --> 0:05:31.160
<v Speaker 1>that world at that time, right, I mean, there were

0:05:31.200 --> 0:05:34.800
<v Speaker 1>like people in colleges and research facilities and governments that

0:05:34.880 --> 0:05:39.240
<v Speaker 1>had access to it for various official purposes. There were

0:05:39.320 --> 0:05:45.760
<v Speaker 1>very few like fun applications outside of some wacky people saying, hey,

0:05:46.160 --> 0:05:50.680
<v Speaker 1>this computer that's crunching numbers for your your astronomy class,

0:05:50.760 --> 0:05:53.919
<v Speaker 1>we can also make it play tic tech toe. I

0:05:53.920 --> 0:05:57.719
<v Speaker 1>mean around about this time, there were also other similar

0:05:57.760 --> 0:05:59.920
<v Speaker 1>sort of projects they think that we're going on at set,

0:06:00.440 --> 0:06:04.240
<v Speaker 1>like people built sort of not competing necessarily, but there

0:06:04.240 --> 0:06:07.720
<v Speaker 1>were other programs that were created to sort of browse

0:06:08.520 --> 0:06:12.159
<v Speaker 1>in a in a more visual way, right, And and

0:06:12.600 --> 0:06:14.960
<v Speaker 1>it turns out that this was a brilliant idea. And

0:06:15.200 --> 0:06:17.880
<v Speaker 1>another little thing to to fall back on is just

0:06:17.920 --> 0:06:21.680
<v Speaker 1>a quick explanation of what's going on with a web browser.

0:06:21.760 --> 0:06:25.680
<v Speaker 1>For those of you who are you know, more casual

0:06:25.760 --> 0:06:28.760
<v Speaker 1>fans of technology, this might be helpful for those of

0:06:28.760 --> 0:06:31.039
<v Speaker 1>you who you know, are really deep in the field.

0:06:31.040 --> 0:06:34.400
<v Speaker 1>This is going to sound incredibly simplistic, but we have

0:06:34.480 --> 0:06:36.919
<v Speaker 1>to talk about what a client is and what a

0:06:37.000 --> 0:06:40.040
<v Speaker 1>server is. So your client is essentially your machine, the

0:06:40.080 --> 0:06:44.320
<v Speaker 1>device you're using to end up retrieving information from some

0:06:44.480 --> 0:06:49.279
<v Speaker 1>other computer a server which actually holds the information that

0:06:49.360 --> 0:06:51.760
<v Speaker 1>you are interested in. So if you are using a

0:06:51.760 --> 0:06:54.680
<v Speaker 1>web browser to visit a web page, there is somewhere

0:06:54.720 --> 0:06:57.680
<v Speaker 1>in the world a computer that has all that information

0:06:57.720 --> 0:07:01.360
<v Speaker 1>on it and it gets the rest from your browser

0:07:01.680 --> 0:07:04.159
<v Speaker 1>the client and says, all right, well, here's what you

0:07:04.200 --> 0:07:07.160
<v Speaker 1>ask for, and send it across the internet. Your browser

0:07:07.360 --> 0:07:10.240
<v Speaker 1>is in charge of displaying that information in some way

0:07:10.280 --> 0:07:16.040
<v Speaker 1>that hopefully is useful and informative. And that's the basic

0:07:16.160 --> 0:07:19.880
<v Speaker 1>relationship that the web browser is built around. It's not

0:07:19.920 --> 0:07:22.720
<v Speaker 1>the only client server relationship, but it's a great example

0:07:22.720 --> 0:07:25.840
<v Speaker 1>of one, I mean, and it's it's interesting because, as

0:07:25.880 --> 0:07:28.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure we will be coming too later, the relationship

0:07:28.840 --> 0:07:31.600
<v Speaker 1>between the idea of a client server model really has

0:07:31.680 --> 0:07:34.680
<v Speaker 1>not changed. And in fact, when you get into the

0:07:34.720 --> 0:07:39.000
<v Speaker 1>likes of the Chrome OS, the browser is just a

0:07:39.120 --> 0:07:42.440
<v Speaker 1>dumb client. It's a client terminal model for the entire

0:07:42.480 --> 0:07:46.320
<v Speaker 1>OS and essentially, but we're moving forward twenty five years

0:07:46.720 --> 0:07:48.760
<v Speaker 1>before we get at that point. The nice thing is

0:07:48.760 --> 0:07:51.520
<v Speaker 1>that this model works so well that it ended up

0:07:51.560 --> 0:07:54.960
<v Speaker 1>being the foundation for a lot of different applications, including

0:07:55.000 --> 0:07:57.840
<v Speaker 1>the Chrome operating system and uh and of course we're

0:07:57.840 --> 0:08:03.120
<v Speaker 1>seeing more and more serve uses and applications migrating to

0:08:03.560 --> 0:08:07.320
<v Speaker 1>the Internet side of things where we see this this uh,

0:08:07.360 --> 0:08:10.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's kind of a seesaw act. Right on

0:08:10.360 --> 0:08:14.480
<v Speaker 1>one side, we see hardware manufacturers that are still saying, no, no, no,

0:08:14.600 --> 0:08:18.880
<v Speaker 1>you really want the strongest, fastest machine possible. And meanwhile

0:08:18.920 --> 0:08:21.640
<v Speaker 1>all the service providers are saying, we're handling all the

0:08:21.680 --> 0:08:24.120
<v Speaker 1>heavy lifting. You just need a device that can connect

0:08:24.120 --> 0:08:28.120
<v Speaker 1>to us. That way we get to control all the stuff. Uh.

0:08:28.160 --> 0:08:31.200
<v Speaker 1>So it's it's but it's because of this relationship that

0:08:31.200 --> 0:08:35.240
<v Speaker 1>that kind of infrastructure is even possible. I mean that,

0:08:35.400 --> 0:08:37.319
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's the interesting thing. Also, just as a

0:08:37.400 --> 0:08:41.520
<v Speaker 1>slight related tangent, I suppose about More's law, which is

0:08:41.520 --> 0:08:45.640
<v Speaker 1>celebrating an anniversary at the moment, is that it's always

0:08:45.640 --> 0:08:48.440
<v Speaker 1>been assumed that we need the most biggest and fastest

0:08:48.440 --> 0:08:50.800
<v Speaker 1>power in our computers because we want to do more

0:08:50.840 --> 0:08:53.520
<v Speaker 1>and more things locally. Which, in a way, if that

0:08:53.559 --> 0:08:55.440
<v Speaker 1>was always going to be true, you would need less

0:08:55.440 --> 0:08:58.520
<v Speaker 1>and less on the on the service side outside of

0:08:58.520 --> 0:09:01.600
<v Speaker 1>the well the realms of um the web. But of

0:09:01.640 --> 0:09:04.760
<v Speaker 1>course now it's becoming much more about efficiency and and

0:09:04.880 --> 0:09:09.080
<v Speaker 1>low cost and and um thinness in our devices, and

0:09:09.120 --> 0:09:11.640
<v Speaker 1>so we don't need that sort of huge lifting power

0:09:11.720 --> 0:09:14.800
<v Speaker 1>within the machines we're currently using ourselves, which makes a

0:09:14.840 --> 0:09:19.280
<v Speaker 1>browser the perfect interface for a modern machine because it

0:09:19.400 --> 0:09:22.280
<v Speaker 1>just needs to be the go between, the conduit between

0:09:22.280 --> 0:09:27.720
<v Speaker 1>the very powerful server and the very small, powerful, less

0:09:27.720 --> 0:09:31.400
<v Speaker 1>powerful desktop machine or laptop or tablet or notebook or

0:09:31.440 --> 0:09:34.520
<v Speaker 1>what have you. And it means More's law has may

0:09:34.559 --> 0:09:38.840
<v Speaker 1>actually become irrelevant before it actually becomes wrong. You know,

0:09:38.880 --> 0:09:41.760
<v Speaker 1>we may not need that power, that sort of doubling

0:09:41.760 --> 0:09:45.640
<v Speaker 1>of power every eighteen months, because we have actually no

0:09:45.720 --> 0:09:48.520
<v Speaker 1>need for that power anymore. And in fact, More's law

0:09:48.559 --> 0:09:53.000
<v Speaker 1>originally was all about the financial side of you know,

0:09:53.040 --> 0:09:56.280
<v Speaker 1>the fact that there were these financial drivers that were

0:09:56.280 --> 0:10:00.600
<v Speaker 1>incentives to create these increasingly more power a full and

0:10:00.760 --> 0:10:04.760
<v Speaker 1>smaller components on a square inch of silicon. Now we're

0:10:04.760 --> 0:10:08.040
<v Speaker 1>getting to a point where if if we don't need that,

0:10:08.160 --> 0:10:11.520
<v Speaker 1>then there's less incentive. So there may be a point

0:10:11.520 --> 0:10:14.640
<v Speaker 1>of pride among some you know, engineers and computer scientists

0:10:14.640 --> 0:10:16.880
<v Speaker 1>who want to keep pushing that envelope and try and

0:10:16.920 --> 0:10:19.520
<v Speaker 1>make it um, you know, try and beat their record

0:10:19.600 --> 0:10:24.559
<v Speaker 1>in a way. But if the the demand isn't there,

0:10:24.760 --> 0:10:28.800
<v Speaker 1>then like you said, Moore's law could become obsolete before

0:10:28.800 --> 0:10:32.800
<v Speaker 1>we hit that fundamental limit from the laws of physics

0:10:33.080 --> 0:10:37.559
<v Speaker 1>that had gone through the same exponential growth that More's

0:10:37.640 --> 0:10:41.760
<v Speaker 1>law predicted for um silicon um, you would be able

0:10:41.840 --> 0:10:45.760
<v Speaker 1>to do a hundred miles on one tenth of a

0:10:45.840 --> 0:10:49.600
<v Speaker 1>millilita of fuel and that would cost you twenty five

0:10:49.640 --> 0:10:54.480
<v Speaker 1>cents in a car that costs twenty five cents. And uh,

0:10:54.559 --> 0:10:57.400
<v Speaker 1>in order to get back to the world that where

0:10:57.440 --> 0:10:59.200
<v Speaker 1>this is, this is being you know, this is a

0:10:59.240 --> 0:11:03.160
<v Speaker 1>relevant thing. UH, going back to the early nineties. This

0:11:03.240 --> 0:11:05.520
<v Speaker 1>is these are the days where early nineties I was

0:11:05.559 --> 0:11:09.480
<v Speaker 1>in high school about to go into college. UM and

0:11:09.800 --> 0:11:14.640
<v Speaker 1>early to mid nineties that's my high school college years. Uh.

0:11:14.720 --> 0:11:16.840
<v Speaker 1>In the those early nineties, you started seeing lots of

0:11:16.840 --> 0:11:21.160
<v Speaker 1>different programmers build their own web browsers. A lot of

0:11:21.160 --> 0:11:23.840
<v Speaker 1>them were within cerns, some of them were in colleges

0:11:23.880 --> 0:11:28.520
<v Speaker 1>and universities, and we started to see more people get

0:11:28.559 --> 0:11:30.679
<v Speaker 1>access to it because it was very clear that this

0:11:30.760 --> 0:11:33.359
<v Speaker 1>was going to be a useful tool to navigate information.

0:11:34.480 --> 0:11:38.559
<v Speaker 1>We move on to February and that's when Mark and

0:11:38.679 --> 0:11:41.880
<v Speaker 1>Reason and Eric Bana of the National Center for Supercomputing

0:11:41.920 --> 0:11:46.079
<v Speaker 1>Applications at the University of Illinois at Urbana champaign A

0:11:46.360 --> 0:11:49.400
<v Speaker 1>eight and C. S A, our mutual friend Tom Merritt

0:11:49.440 --> 0:11:52.920
<v Speaker 1>I believe, went to the University of Illinois UH in

0:11:53.080 --> 0:11:56.319
<v Speaker 1>C s A. They decided to introduce a browser themselves

0:11:56.320 --> 0:12:00.480
<v Speaker 1>that was the Mosaic Browser. It was on Unix, it

0:12:00.520 --> 0:12:05.079
<v Speaker 1>was also for the the X Windows platform UM and UH.

0:12:05.120 --> 0:12:08.400
<v Speaker 1>There their colleague Alex Todec created a version that could

0:12:08.440 --> 0:12:10.520
<v Speaker 1>run on Macintosh computer. So this was a browser that

0:12:10.559 --> 0:12:14.880
<v Speaker 1>could run on cross platforms. Although uh the appearance of

0:12:14.960 --> 0:12:18.240
<v Speaker 1>web information vary depending upon what platform you were using,

0:12:18.280 --> 0:12:22.240
<v Speaker 1>So it wasn't a m a smooth experience across all platforms.

0:12:22.240 --> 0:12:24.000
<v Speaker 1>It wasn't something that was It wasn't like you were

0:12:24.000 --> 0:12:26.160
<v Speaker 1>going to get the exact same experience on one machine

0:12:26.400 --> 0:12:29.720
<v Speaker 1>as on another, but you could get to the information.

0:12:30.559 --> 0:12:32.560
<v Speaker 1>UH and I had a lot of features that said,

0:12:32.600 --> 0:12:35.520
<v Speaker 1>apart from the earlier web browsers, like things that we

0:12:35.559 --> 0:12:38.040
<v Speaker 1>take for granted now, like bookmarks, you know that would

0:12:38.640 --> 0:12:41.880
<v Speaker 1>being able to to mark a specific web page is

0:12:41.960 --> 0:12:44.440
<v Speaker 1>something of interest so that you can easily navigate to

0:12:44.520 --> 0:12:47.800
<v Speaker 1>it in the future. It was really important also things

0:12:47.840 --> 0:12:50.160
<v Speaker 1>like icons and pictures as opposed to just text, which

0:12:50.200 --> 0:12:52.920
<v Speaker 1>made it more attractive to look at um and it

0:12:52.960 --> 0:12:56.079
<v Speaker 1>was free to use. And it's important to mention this

0:12:56.160 --> 0:12:59.000
<v Speaker 1>beforehand because it turns out a lot of the the

0:12:59.200 --> 0:13:01.640
<v Speaker 1>stuff they worked on would later find its way into

0:13:01.800 --> 0:13:08.080
<v Speaker 1>other future web browsers. By market, Drissa would partner with

0:13:08.200 --> 0:13:11.200
<v Speaker 1>Jeff clark and who was the founder of Silicon Graphics.

0:13:11.200 --> 0:13:17.200
<v Speaker 1>They created Mosaic Communications. It was later renamed to Netscape Communications,

0:13:17.800 --> 0:13:19.880
<v Speaker 1>and they started to develop a web browser for the

0:13:19.920 --> 0:13:22.760
<v Speaker 1>consumer market. So that's gonna sound really familiar to anyone

0:13:22.800 --> 0:13:26.040
<v Speaker 1>who was, you know, using computers around the time of

0:13:26.080 --> 0:13:29.800
<v Speaker 1>the first browser Wars. Netscape should definitely ring a bell.

0:13:30.920 --> 0:13:34.480
<v Speaker 1>This is around the time that that Windows is basically

0:13:34.520 --> 0:13:37.840
<v Speaker 1>about to go gold and and go on sales, so

0:13:37.840 --> 0:13:40.360
<v Speaker 1>we're still in Windows three point one era at the moment.

0:13:40.440 --> 0:13:45.160
<v Speaker 1>I think, and uh, and I mean the Netscape navigator,

0:13:45.200 --> 0:13:48.080
<v Speaker 1>I think was the very I might have used Mosaic

0:13:48.120 --> 0:13:49.960
<v Speaker 1>when I was in college, come to think of it,

0:13:50.080 --> 0:13:55.439
<v Speaker 1>But I'm pretty sure. I quickly transition to Netscape Navigator

0:13:56.160 --> 0:14:00.400
<v Speaker 1>and that became my browser of choice in those days. Um,

0:14:00.440 --> 0:14:02.320
<v Speaker 1>you know I didn't ask you, Nate, what browser do

0:14:02.400 --> 0:14:06.559
<v Speaker 1>you typically use when I use Safari for almost everything,

0:14:06.679 --> 0:14:09.640
<v Speaker 1>So you are you are clearly a Mac owner. I

0:14:09.679 --> 0:14:12.560
<v Speaker 1>am a Mac owner. I I love Safari because I

0:14:12.760 --> 0:14:15.960
<v Speaker 1>use almost no add ons at all, because I just

0:14:16.040 --> 0:14:18.480
<v Speaker 1>want speed and fast and I need it to sink

0:14:18.600 --> 0:14:21.480
<v Speaker 1>everything and so far as always work really well for me,

0:14:21.960 --> 0:14:26.040
<v Speaker 1>that makes sense. I detest Safari with a passion that

0:14:26.040 --> 0:14:29.200
<v Speaker 1>burns brighter than a thousand explaining funds. But it's mostly

0:14:29.200 --> 0:14:31.520
<v Speaker 1>because I don't use a Mac. If I did use

0:14:31.560 --> 0:14:34.160
<v Speaker 1>a Mac, then, like, if you're in the Apple infrastructure,

0:14:34.280 --> 0:14:38.760
<v Speaker 1>it's amazing. If you're all in, it's phenomenal. If you're

0:14:38.760 --> 0:14:41.560
<v Speaker 1>only kind of sort of in, it gets really irritating

0:14:41.600 --> 0:14:45.560
<v Speaker 1>really quickly. But then I'm all in on the Google infrastructure,

0:14:45.600 --> 0:14:48.800
<v Speaker 1>so I use Chrome. Yes, that's the difference, you see,

0:14:48.800 --> 0:14:51.720
<v Speaker 1>because the browser is the thing you use the most,

0:14:51.880 --> 0:14:55.120
<v Speaker 1>I would imagine, and so if your phone is the

0:14:55.160 --> 0:14:57.200
<v Speaker 1>thing that you carry and use the most in the day,

0:14:57.280 --> 0:14:59.000
<v Speaker 1>then it stands to reason that you're going to want

0:14:59.000 --> 0:15:01.840
<v Speaker 1>to use a browser that it's best on a phone, right,

0:15:02.040 --> 0:15:04.840
<v Speaker 1>and that's kind of peeking ahead to some of the

0:15:04.920 --> 0:15:09.440
<v Speaker 1>issues with Internet Explorer. Uh So, so we get the

0:15:09.520 --> 0:15:12.080
<v Speaker 1>n c s A licensing the commercial rights to Mosaic

0:15:12.320 --> 0:15:15.200
<v Speaker 1>to a company that was called at the time spy Glass.

0:15:15.240 --> 0:15:18.000
<v Speaker 1>The company no longer exists, so that should tell you

0:15:18.040 --> 0:15:20.840
<v Speaker 1>how things turn out in the future. Spy Glass ended

0:15:20.920 --> 0:15:24.720
<v Speaker 1>up licensing that same technology to other companies, including Microsoft,

0:15:25.040 --> 0:15:28.520
<v Speaker 1>So the Mosaic code ends up making its way to Microsoft.

0:15:29.000 --> 0:15:31.440
<v Speaker 1>Um and that was really important to Microsoft because, as

0:15:31.520 --> 0:15:35.440
<v Speaker 1>Nate was saying, they were preparing Windows for launch and

0:15:35.480 --> 0:15:37.760
<v Speaker 1>they really wanted to have a component in there that

0:15:37.800 --> 0:15:41.160
<v Speaker 1>would be a web browser, and they had decided that

0:15:41.240 --> 0:15:44.360
<v Speaker 1>it made more sense to license that technology from someone

0:15:44.360 --> 0:15:47.840
<v Speaker 1>else rather than trying to develop it in house. So

0:15:47.880 --> 0:15:50.920
<v Speaker 1>that's what led them to spy Glass and licensing the

0:15:50.920 --> 0:15:55.800
<v Speaker 1>Mosaic code. Uh October, Netscape would release a beta version

0:15:55.840 --> 0:15:58.760
<v Speaker 1>of their project, which was codenamed Mozilla that will become

0:15:58.800 --> 0:16:03.040
<v Speaker 1>important later to It was designated zero point nine six

0:16:03.080 --> 0:16:07.840
<v Speaker 1>b H. I decided early on that when I we

0:16:07.880 --> 0:16:10.720
<v Speaker 1>started looking at the actual builds of Internet Explorer, we're

0:16:10.720 --> 0:16:15.720
<v Speaker 1>gonna look at whole numbers only, because otherwise the path

0:16:15.840 --> 0:16:18.520
<v Speaker 1>leads to madness. You mean you're not going to consider

0:16:18.640 --> 0:16:22.640
<v Speaker 1>Chrome version twenty six point nine point six two point

0:16:22.680 --> 0:16:27.680
<v Speaker 1>three six four a seminal release. I mean it was beautiful, really,

0:16:27.720 --> 0:16:30.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean that the fact that it it improves so

0:16:30.400 --> 0:16:33.080
<v Speaker 1>much upon the President accessor that came out earlier that

0:16:33.160 --> 0:16:38.840
<v Speaker 1>same day is phenomenal. But no, I'm going to skip it. Um. Yeah,

0:16:38.880 --> 0:16:42.440
<v Speaker 1>So we move on to to August. That is the

0:16:42.520 --> 0:16:48.680
<v Speaker 1>day Microsoft released the Windows operating system. Uh man, I

0:16:48.720 --> 0:16:53.640
<v Speaker 1>still remember the commercials for Windows they had. They had

0:16:53.680 --> 0:16:58.120
<v Speaker 1>this little band, the Rolling Stones, that had a song

0:16:58.240 --> 0:17:01.280
<v Speaker 1>called start Me Up that played during the Windows ninety

0:17:01.320 --> 0:17:03.160
<v Speaker 1>five commercials. Because that was also the introduction of the

0:17:03.160 --> 0:17:07.080
<v Speaker 1>start button on Windows, the little button that wouldn't quit

0:17:07.320 --> 0:17:10.760
<v Speaker 1>or people wouldn't let the little button quit. And they

0:17:10.800 --> 0:17:15.640
<v Speaker 1>introduced a web browser which they named Internet Explorer. Made

0:17:15.640 --> 0:17:17.720
<v Speaker 1>a lot of sense, it was it was, in fact,

0:17:17.800 --> 0:17:21.800
<v Speaker 1>a way to navigate through the Internet, specifically the World

0:17:21.840 --> 0:17:23.679
<v Speaker 1>Wide Web. But this is this is the point I

0:17:23.720 --> 0:17:25.879
<v Speaker 1>just interjected, because this is the thing that I've always

0:17:25.920 --> 0:17:29.840
<v Speaker 1>hated about Internet Explorer is that it's a web browser, right.

0:17:30.280 --> 0:17:34.359
<v Speaker 1>Why is it not called Web Explorer. I think, uh,

0:17:34.480 --> 0:17:37.119
<v Speaker 1>I think they were afraid they might have, you know,

0:17:37.359 --> 0:17:41.080
<v Speaker 1>some sort of confusion with spiders or something. I don't know, Nate,

0:17:41.240 --> 0:17:44.760
<v Speaker 1>It's it confuses me to but yeah, Internet Explorer one

0:17:44.800 --> 0:17:48.800
<v Speaker 1>point oh came out with Windows. They had an agreement

0:17:48.840 --> 0:17:52.800
<v Speaker 1>with spy Glass, which was incredibly clever. Some might call

0:17:52.880 --> 0:17:57.760
<v Speaker 1>it sneaky and underhanded. Their agreement with spy Glass, So

0:17:57.800 --> 0:18:02.160
<v Speaker 1>Spyglass makes the the code the tech analogy that Internet

0:18:02.160 --> 0:18:07.520
<v Speaker 1>Explorer runs on Internet Explorer. The agreement with Spyglass was

0:18:07.560 --> 0:18:10.760
<v Speaker 1>that Microsoft would pay a quarterly fee to spy Glass.

0:18:10.800 --> 0:18:13.679
<v Speaker 1>All right, that's cool, and they also agreed to share

0:18:13.920 --> 0:18:20.120
<v Speaker 1>royalties for Internet Explorer. But Microsoft also decided to bundle

0:18:20.200 --> 0:18:25.680
<v Speaker 1>Internet Explorer with Windows, so Internet Explore itself wasn't on sale,

0:18:26.320 --> 0:18:29.480
<v Speaker 1>and so if you're not selling it, you can't make royalties,

0:18:29.760 --> 0:18:31.800
<v Speaker 1>which means they didn't have to share any money from

0:18:31.800 --> 0:18:39.960
<v Speaker 1>the Windows sales to Spyglass. Yeah. Pretty sneaky. Um that

0:18:39.960 --> 0:18:42.960
<v Speaker 1>would end up biting them a little bit later, but

0:18:43.000 --> 0:18:44.760
<v Speaker 1>at then, you're right, at the time they were just like, hey,

0:18:44.840 --> 0:18:48.720
<v Speaker 1>we really scored on this. Now when they started, only

0:18:49.000 --> 0:18:53.399
<v Speaker 1>six Microsoft employees. According to every source I saw only

0:18:53.480 --> 0:18:57.040
<v Speaker 1>six people in Microsoft were actually working on Internet Explorer,

0:18:57.080 --> 0:18:59.800
<v Speaker 1>which is kind of hard to believe today. Um and

0:19:00.440 --> 0:19:02.959
<v Speaker 1>at the time, the web was not what you and

0:19:03.000 --> 0:19:06.200
<v Speaker 1>I are used to. It had about twenty basic tags

0:19:06.200 --> 0:19:11.000
<v Speaker 1>and HTML that allowed you to construct pages and change

0:19:11.040 --> 0:19:14.199
<v Speaker 1>the style things like tables and and the font size

0:19:14.240 --> 0:19:17.280
<v Speaker 1>that kind of stuff. So it's really really basic. And

0:19:17.320 --> 0:19:21.560
<v Speaker 1>if you ever look at screenshots of old browsers and

0:19:21.720 --> 0:19:25.919
<v Speaker 1>old web pages, I mean, it mostly looks like the

0:19:25.960 --> 0:19:29.400
<v Speaker 1>blandest Wikipedia page you have ever seen, with no pictures

0:19:29.480 --> 0:19:31.560
<v Speaker 1>or anything like that. A lot of the early ones

0:19:31.600 --> 0:19:34.560
<v Speaker 1>don't have any pictures on them because if you did

0:19:34.600 --> 0:19:37.919
<v Speaker 1>put a picture on it, then you were shooting yourself

0:19:37.920 --> 0:19:40.399
<v Speaker 1>in the foot. Most of us did not have any

0:19:40.760 --> 0:19:44.800
<v Speaker 1>fast connection to any kind of networks, so accessing a

0:19:44.800 --> 0:19:48.720
<v Speaker 1>website with pictures meant that you would start, you know,

0:19:48.760 --> 0:19:51.359
<v Speaker 1>you navigate to the page, walk away from your computer

0:19:51.400 --> 0:19:53.399
<v Speaker 1>for ten minutes, and then come back to see if

0:19:53.400 --> 0:19:56.080
<v Speaker 1>the pictures it all loaded. I remember it well. I

0:19:56.119 --> 0:19:58.159
<v Speaker 1>particularly remember it when I was trying to view pictures

0:19:58.160 --> 0:20:01.640
<v Speaker 1>on the now defunct page. Cat scan why people would

0:20:01.680 --> 0:20:04.640
<v Speaker 1>use flatbed scanners to scan the undersides of their cats,

0:20:05.359 --> 0:20:08.080
<v Speaker 1>And yeah, you I could actually walk away and be

0:20:08.160 --> 0:20:10.560
<v Speaker 1>very British and make a cup of tea while waiting

0:20:10.560 --> 0:20:13.000
<v Speaker 1>for the photo of the cat to arrive on my computer.

0:20:14.040 --> 0:20:16.399
<v Speaker 1>I guess this is the point where I I I

0:20:16.440 --> 0:20:20.639
<v Speaker 1>mentioned that Nate has too particular great passions in life,

0:20:20.640 --> 0:20:26.000
<v Speaker 1>which include metal and cats. Yes, and the other ones,

0:20:26.080 --> 0:20:27.560
<v Speaker 1>but they are the ones I am known for. It

0:20:27.600 --> 0:20:29.679
<v Speaker 1>seems those are the those are the two I whenever

0:20:29.760 --> 0:20:33.439
<v Speaker 1>I hear anything from you on social media, there's a

0:20:33.560 --> 0:20:36.280
<v Speaker 1>there's a probably at chance it's going to fall into

0:20:36.280 --> 0:20:39.040
<v Speaker 1>one of those two categories. Yeah. So there's still quite

0:20:39.160 --> 0:20:41.919
<v Speaker 1>a few other things. But they don't they don't they

0:20:41.960 --> 0:20:45.200
<v Speaker 1>don't hit as high as slice on the pie chart. Yes,

0:20:45.280 --> 0:20:49.400
<v Speaker 1>that's very true, very true. So one of the things

0:20:49.480 --> 0:20:53.560
<v Speaker 1>about the limitations of HTML that were that was a

0:20:53.560 --> 0:20:58.199
<v Speaker 1>particular thorn in the sides of early web browsers and

0:20:58.440 --> 0:21:02.560
<v Speaker 1>web users was that the limitations meant people had to

0:21:02.560 --> 0:21:07.960
<v Speaker 1>find creative ways around those limitations to create rich user experiences.

0:21:08.040 --> 0:21:10.359
<v Speaker 1>I don't think did they ever use that term in

0:21:10.400 --> 0:21:15.159
<v Speaker 1>the UK, the rich user experience that experience. Yes, I

0:21:15.200 --> 0:21:17.439
<v Speaker 1>mean we we probably heard it quite a bit. I

0:21:17.440 --> 0:21:19.959
<v Speaker 1>don't remember it particularly, but I imagine it was there

0:21:20.000 --> 0:21:23.800
<v Speaker 1>amongst all the other ones like zip drives and yeah right,

0:21:24.119 --> 0:21:27.679
<v Speaker 1>all right, uh yeah, the rich user experience. That was

0:21:27.760 --> 0:21:30.600
<v Speaker 1>something where the idea was that you wanted to create

0:21:30.840 --> 0:21:34.640
<v Speaker 1>a an experience for the user that went beyond just

0:21:35.080 --> 0:21:38.800
<v Speaker 1>simple text lines and pictures. So one of the earliest

0:21:38.800 --> 0:21:43.040
<v Speaker 1>ones would be middies that would loop and there'll be

0:21:43.200 --> 0:21:47.920
<v Speaker 1>no way to stop them. H Do remember those? Yes,

0:21:48.040 --> 0:21:52.200
<v Speaker 1>I do remember those, Yes, middies, My goodness, middies. Yes, yes,

0:21:52.240 --> 0:21:55.560
<v Speaker 1>So just the days of my space where you would

0:21:55.600 --> 0:21:58.359
<v Speaker 1>go to someone's MySpace page. I mean this that goes

0:21:58.400 --> 0:22:01.400
<v Speaker 1>beyond what we're talking about here, but even then, oh

0:22:01.480 --> 0:22:04.960
<v Speaker 1>the not not I'm not sad to see those days go. However,

0:22:05.080 --> 0:22:07.520
<v Speaker 1>what it meant was that people had to create software

0:22:08.160 --> 0:22:10.880
<v Speaker 1>that would be a plug in, an enhancement to a

0:22:10.880 --> 0:22:15.800
<v Speaker 1>web browser to allow users to access certain types of content,

0:22:16.000 --> 0:22:19.480
<v Speaker 1>largely streaming content, whether it was audio or video. So

0:22:19.520 --> 0:22:22.239
<v Speaker 1>if you had a web browser in those days, you

0:22:22.280 --> 0:22:25.240
<v Speaker 1>had to often enhance it with these plug ins, which

0:22:25.240 --> 0:22:29.040
<v Speaker 1>made the browsers clung here slower. They they required more memory,

0:22:29.040 --> 0:22:33.040
<v Speaker 1>and those days also memory was not as um plentiful

0:22:33.400 --> 0:22:37.040
<v Speaker 1>as it is today computer memory, so your whole computer

0:22:37.040 --> 0:22:39.159
<v Speaker 1>would start to run more slowly if you tried to

0:22:39.520 --> 0:22:42.760
<v Speaker 1>access anything that had any kind of you know, video

0:22:42.840 --> 0:22:45.560
<v Speaker 1>or flash animation. Flash is another example, some plug ins

0:22:45.560 --> 0:22:47.600
<v Speaker 1>that you had to have in order to get more

0:22:47.600 --> 0:22:51.359
<v Speaker 1>out of the web pages. We would not see advances

0:22:51.400 --> 0:22:54.600
<v Speaker 1>to HTML for a while that would address this. The

0:22:54.640 --> 0:22:58.480
<v Speaker 1>whole point of HTML five is to take away the

0:22:58.560 --> 0:23:01.920
<v Speaker 1>need for all these different uggins that often can become

0:23:02.000 --> 0:23:05.440
<v Speaker 1>security vulnerabilities. UM. The idea of being that this way

0:23:05.480 --> 0:23:10.280
<v Speaker 1>we can support those those different functions natively within HTML

0:23:11.119 --> 0:23:14.159
<v Speaker 1>and not have to have a Swiss Army knife style

0:23:14.359 --> 0:23:20.000
<v Speaker 1>web browser where you've added all these extra features. UM. Anyway,

0:23:20.920 --> 0:23:23.800
<v Speaker 1>the first version of Internet Explorer was a thousand bare

0:23:23.840 --> 0:23:28.160
<v Speaker 1>bones as you can get, and the second one came

0:23:28.160 --> 0:23:32.720
<v Speaker 1>out November twenty second, nineteen. So if you remember I

0:23:32.760 --> 0:23:36.560
<v Speaker 1>said the first one came out August, I E two

0:23:36.600 --> 0:23:42.280
<v Speaker 1>comes out November twenty that that's an incredibly narrow window

0:23:42.600 --> 0:23:49.760
<v Speaker 1>for an entire version upgrade. You know, it's uh fast,

0:23:49.840 --> 0:23:53.360
<v Speaker 1>does not really go into it. This one was for

0:23:53.720 --> 0:23:56.600
<v Speaker 1>Windows ninety five and Windows NT three point five and

0:23:56.600 --> 0:23:59.840
<v Speaker 1>Windows INT four point oh, so that means within three

0:24:00.000 --> 0:24:04.040
<v Speaker 1>once you get a full version upgrade. But that was

0:24:04.080 --> 0:24:06.679
<v Speaker 1>actually kind of typical in the early days because the

0:24:06.720 --> 0:24:10.560
<v Speaker 1>browsers were being We're getting more and more advanced very quickly.

0:24:10.600 --> 0:24:13.080
<v Speaker 1>Everyone was really interested in this. This was the days

0:24:14.040 --> 0:24:17.240
<v Speaker 1>when the media was starting to take notice of the

0:24:17.240 --> 0:24:20.000
<v Speaker 1>World Wide Web and it was going beyond just uh,

0:24:20.200 --> 0:24:24.480
<v Speaker 1>the the governments and colleges and research facilities. So with

0:24:24.680 --> 0:24:28.000
<v Speaker 1>that focus, you wanted to really get your browser too

0:24:28.760 --> 0:24:31.439
<v Speaker 1>to be uh, you know, a destination people wanted to

0:24:31.480 --> 0:24:35.040
<v Speaker 1>go to. The people needed this technology. There was another

0:24:35.080 --> 0:24:37.679
<v Speaker 1>feature that they thought people needed an Internet to explore

0:24:37.720 --> 0:24:44.199
<v Speaker 1>it too. I remember what's delicious cookies? Oh you know what?

0:24:44.240 --> 0:24:48.600
<v Speaker 1>Those are important? Um, they have been misused and that

0:24:48.760 --> 0:24:54.159
<v Speaker 1>is unfortunate. They can cause huge problems. They are definitely

0:24:54.280 --> 0:24:56.040
<v Speaker 1>one of those things you've got to worry about if

0:24:56.040 --> 0:25:00.000
<v Speaker 1>you are concerned about Internet privacy. However, that being said,

0:25:00.000 --> 0:25:03.879
<v Speaker 1>head it's also nice to be able to navigate to

0:25:03.920 --> 0:25:07.879
<v Speaker 1>a website. You're in the middle of doing something you

0:25:07.960 --> 0:25:10.560
<v Speaker 1>have to shut down and leave. When you navigate to

0:25:10.600 --> 0:25:13.160
<v Speaker 1>that same website on that same machine, you can pick

0:25:13.240 --> 0:25:15.720
<v Speaker 1>up right where you left off. That's thanks to cookies.

0:25:16.440 --> 0:25:20.000
<v Speaker 1>So cookies are just really short, short bits of data

0:25:20.640 --> 0:25:23.960
<v Speaker 1>really just a short, short range of bits if you

0:25:23.960 --> 0:25:27.479
<v Speaker 1>want to get down to it, and the act as

0:25:27.600 --> 0:25:31.240
<v Speaker 1>kind of identifier and a placeholder so that when you

0:25:31.280 --> 0:25:35.520
<v Speaker 1>start a session with a web page the website, the

0:25:35.560 --> 0:25:38.400
<v Speaker 1>web server can keep track of who you are and

0:25:38.440 --> 0:25:41.480
<v Speaker 1>what you are doing, so that if you do leave

0:25:41.560 --> 0:25:43.840
<v Speaker 1>for some reason and come back, you can pick up

0:25:43.880 --> 0:25:47.440
<v Speaker 1>where you left off. So in retail, for example, if

0:25:47.480 --> 0:25:49.560
<v Speaker 1>I put something in my shopping cart, but I haven't

0:25:49.960 --> 0:25:53.960
<v Speaker 1>completed the transaction and I leave the website, the next

0:25:53.960 --> 0:25:56.280
<v Speaker 1>time I go back to that website, I might still

0:25:56.320 --> 0:25:59.920
<v Speaker 1>have that item in the shopping cart, because the cookies

0:26:00.040 --> 0:26:02.840
<v Speaker 1>tell the server, hey, it's that same dude who just

0:26:02.960 --> 0:26:06.960
<v Speaker 1>can't commit to purchasing this squeaky toy for his dog

0:26:07.600 --> 0:26:11.840
<v Speaker 1>to be a great example for me. Um. So cookies

0:26:11.920 --> 0:26:15.960
<v Speaker 1>definitely had their place, but obviously have been They've got

0:26:15.960 --> 0:26:18.200
<v Speaker 1>a lot of There's a lot of bad rap about

0:26:18.240 --> 0:26:21.400
<v Speaker 1>cookies too, because of things like the idea of tracking

0:26:22.160 --> 0:26:26.159
<v Speaker 1>um web browsing activity and and sharing things that you

0:26:26.240 --> 0:26:30.400
<v Speaker 1>might have thought were private otherwise. But they come from

0:26:30.400 --> 0:26:34.280
<v Speaker 1>a good place, they do, and they are useful. Let's

0:26:34.320 --> 0:26:36.639
<v Speaker 1>be honest, they are very useful. The web would not

0:26:36.680 --> 0:26:39.600
<v Speaker 1>be what the web is now in a bad way.

0:26:39.680 --> 0:26:42.359
<v Speaker 1>I think. Were it not for cookies, well yeah, I

0:26:42.359 --> 0:26:47.360
<v Speaker 1>mean they just allowed the Internet to be more personal. Yeah, yeah, exactly.

0:26:47.480 --> 0:26:50.679
<v Speaker 1>You you know, the idea that that your experience on

0:26:50.720 --> 0:26:54.720
<v Speaker 1>the web is at least in some part defined by

0:26:55.040 --> 0:27:00.520
<v Speaker 1>and tuned to you, so that you have the experience

0:27:00.560 --> 0:27:02.919
<v Speaker 1>you want, or at least if you're working at it,

0:27:02.960 --> 0:27:05.199
<v Speaker 1>you can have the experience you want. I wish that

0:27:05.280 --> 0:27:09.119
<v Speaker 1>it were effortless, so that just through the use of

0:27:09.160 --> 0:27:11.960
<v Speaker 1>the web it becomes the way you want. For some people,

0:27:12.600 --> 0:27:15.120
<v Speaker 1>it becomes the way it is rather than the way

0:27:15.200 --> 0:27:17.399
<v Speaker 1>they want it to be because they don't know the

0:27:17.440 --> 0:27:21.199
<v Speaker 1>tricks to, you know, kind of tune it as much

0:27:21.280 --> 0:27:24.520
<v Speaker 1>as they would like. But without cookies, it would not

0:27:24.560 --> 0:27:26.960
<v Speaker 1>be possible at all. You would just have the same

0:27:27.000 --> 0:27:29.560
<v Speaker 1>experience every single time you logged into any web page.

0:27:29.600 --> 0:27:32.600
<v Speaker 1>It would be as if you were there day zero,

0:27:33.240 --> 0:27:35.080
<v Speaker 1>like that's the first time you had ever visited it,

0:27:35.160 --> 0:27:36.960
<v Speaker 1>and you would have to go through whatever it is,

0:27:37.320 --> 0:27:40.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, like whether it's logging into a service or

0:27:40.560 --> 0:27:43.480
<v Speaker 1>adding things into a list, whatever that might be. You

0:27:43.520 --> 0:27:45.480
<v Speaker 1>would have to do that every single time. If it

0:27:45.520 --> 0:27:50.240
<v Speaker 1>weren't for things like cookies. Yeah. Um, the next version

0:27:50.240 --> 0:27:53.920
<v Speaker 1>of Internet Explorer number three, if you're keeping count, wouldn't

0:27:53.920 --> 0:27:57.560
<v Speaker 1>come along until August thirteen, So they went almost a

0:27:57.600 --> 0:28:02.560
<v Speaker 1>full year, unthinkable without coming up with a new version.

0:28:03.040 --> 0:28:05.560
<v Speaker 1>This was the first one to really start to get

0:28:05.600 --> 0:28:09.760
<v Speaker 1>some traction in the web browser wars because uh, the

0:28:09.920 --> 0:28:13.000
<v Speaker 1>other browsers had. First of all, you gotta keep in mind,

0:28:13.040 --> 0:28:16.160
<v Speaker 1>it was still a pretty small piece of the overall population.

0:28:16.280 --> 0:28:19.400
<v Speaker 1>Pie There weren't that many people online on the web.

0:28:19.440 --> 0:28:25.080
<v Speaker 1>In um there were, there were lots, but if you

0:28:25.359 --> 0:28:27.200
<v Speaker 1>compared to the number of people who weren't, it was

0:28:27.280 --> 0:28:30.680
<v Speaker 1>a tiny number. Uh. That being said, there were things

0:28:30.720 --> 0:28:35.399
<v Speaker 1>like like um Netscape and Mosaic and other browsers that

0:28:35.400 --> 0:28:39.720
<v Speaker 1>were already they already had a good share of the market,

0:28:39.760 --> 0:28:41.760
<v Speaker 1>so I was just starting to pick up. By the

0:28:41.840 --> 0:28:44.920
<v Speaker 1>end of ninety seven, it accounted for about a third

0:28:45.040 --> 0:28:49.880
<v Speaker 1>of the browser market, just under round. And that gets

0:28:49.920 --> 0:28:52.480
<v Speaker 1>us into the browser wars, which are like star Wars

0:28:52.800 --> 0:28:56.520
<v Speaker 1>but more boring. Um. But in my notes, I wrote,

0:28:56.520 --> 0:29:00.400
<v Speaker 1>many botons died to bring us this information. I so

0:29:00.680 --> 0:29:04.920
<v Speaker 1>out of uh my depth to even understand why that

0:29:05.080 --> 0:29:09.200
<v Speaker 1>is funny. The guy who hasn't even seen old Star

0:29:09.200 --> 0:29:12.719
<v Speaker 1>Wars films. Yeah, it hurts me to hear that. But

0:29:12.880 --> 0:29:16.120
<v Speaker 1>then again, my former my my original co host, Chris Palette,

0:29:16.280 --> 0:29:18.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't think even to this day has seen the

0:29:18.200 --> 0:29:23.200
<v Speaker 1>movie Jaws. So he's he killed a small piece of

0:29:23.240 --> 0:29:26.120
<v Speaker 1>me that day when he revealed that information. But that,

0:29:26.200 --> 0:29:29.040
<v Speaker 1>of course is a quote from Star Wars and New

0:29:29.080 --> 0:29:33.360
<v Speaker 1>Hope when mon Mathma is explaining the um collection of

0:29:33.400 --> 0:29:37.360
<v Speaker 1>the data of the Death Star um that many Botans

0:29:37.400 --> 0:29:46.640
<v Speaker 1>died to bring us this. Uh. Internet Explorer three was

0:29:46.640 --> 0:29:49.880
<v Speaker 1>also the first browser that did not use the Spyglass

0:29:49.960 --> 0:29:52.840
<v Speaker 1>source code. There were elements of Spyglass technology in there,

0:29:52.840 --> 0:29:56.560
<v Speaker 1>so that was still listed in the about page on

0:29:56.680 --> 0:29:58.920
<v Speaker 1>Internet Internet Explorer. They kind of had a you know,

0:29:59.400 --> 0:30:01.800
<v Speaker 1>a license a little bit about how some of the

0:30:01.840 --> 0:30:04.840
<v Speaker 1>technology was licensed from them, but they had moved away

0:30:04.920 --> 0:30:09.120
<v Speaker 1>from Spyglass to start working on a different source code

0:30:09.280 --> 0:30:12.600
<v Speaker 1>to underlie Internet Explorer. And it was the first one

0:30:12.640 --> 0:30:16.760
<v Speaker 1>to introduce internet mail to Internet Explorer and News one

0:30:16.840 --> 0:30:20.880
<v Speaker 1>point zero and the Windows address Book. Neither of those

0:30:20.880 --> 0:30:23.320
<v Speaker 1>things would matter for very long, but they were included

0:30:23.360 --> 0:30:27.120
<v Speaker 1>in the Internet Explorer three uh, and they added in

0:30:27.240 --> 0:30:29.760
<v Speaker 1>the support for lots of the plug ins that Netscape

0:30:29.800 --> 0:30:31.680
<v Speaker 1>could use, and that goes back to what I was

0:30:31.720 --> 0:30:36.640
<v Speaker 1>talking about earlier. It increased the ability for Internet Explorer

0:30:36.680 --> 0:30:40.520
<v Speaker 1>to access certain features that otherwise would just be unplayable.

0:30:41.200 --> 0:30:44.720
<v Speaker 1>Get a little red x saying this doesn't work here.

0:30:44.960 --> 0:30:50.880
<v Speaker 1>Um yeah this also. By the way, one of the

0:30:50.920 --> 0:30:54.080
<v Speaker 1>reasons why I love the development of HTML five and

0:30:54.120 --> 0:30:57.760
<v Speaker 1>the conversion to HTML five is that I also remember

0:30:57.800 --> 0:31:01.360
<v Speaker 1>the days of those plug and leading to lots of

0:31:01.360 --> 0:31:07.560
<v Speaker 1>opportunities for hackers to create fake uh alert messages saying hey,

0:31:07.640 --> 0:31:09.440
<v Speaker 1>I know you want to see this, but you can't

0:31:09.520 --> 0:31:13.400
<v Speaker 1>unless you first download the plug in or up update

0:31:13.480 --> 0:31:16.040
<v Speaker 1>your plug in so that you can watch it. But

0:31:16.120 --> 0:31:18.520
<v Speaker 1>in fact, instead of it actually being a plug in,

0:31:18.960 --> 0:31:21.280
<v Speaker 1>it was a virus that you were agreeing to download

0:31:21.320 --> 0:31:23.880
<v Speaker 1>and install to your machine. So you get one of

0:31:23.880 --> 0:31:26.000
<v Speaker 1>those messages saying, oh, you want to watch this, but

0:31:26.040 --> 0:31:28.200
<v Speaker 1>you need to update to the latest version of real

0:31:28.280 --> 0:31:31.480
<v Speaker 1>Player for example. Uh. And it wasn't actually a real

0:31:31.520 --> 0:31:34.760
<v Speaker 1>Player update or or installed file. It was an install

0:31:34.840 --> 0:31:38.720
<v Speaker 1>file for some malware that ran that that was rampant

0:31:39.160 --> 0:31:41.680
<v Speaker 1>at a certain point in the history of the Internet.

0:31:42.200 --> 0:31:46.720
<v Speaker 1>So the the slow migration away from the plug in

0:31:46.840 --> 0:31:49.280
<v Speaker 1>days is something that I've been waiting for for a

0:31:49.320 --> 0:31:52.800
<v Speaker 1>long time because I get tired of answering those questions.

0:31:53.560 --> 0:31:57.200
<v Speaker 1>Um I E three also and support for cascading style sheets.

0:31:57.320 --> 0:32:00.360
<v Speaker 1>Now this again very technical part of it, but it's

0:32:00.600 --> 0:32:04.600
<v Speaker 1>basically an easy way to define the style the appearance

0:32:05.480 --> 0:32:08.000
<v Speaker 1>of a web page. One of the things that was

0:32:08.040 --> 0:32:10.160
<v Speaker 1>a big challenge in the early days of web browsers

0:32:10.520 --> 0:32:13.200
<v Speaker 1>was making sure that the web page was going to

0:32:13.240 --> 0:32:18.600
<v Speaker 1>show up the way the web designer intended it. Um, Nate,

0:32:18.600 --> 0:32:20.920
<v Speaker 1>did you ever have to build a website without the

0:32:21.040 --> 0:32:23.440
<v Speaker 1>use of a whizzy wig editor or something where you

0:32:23.440 --> 0:32:26.240
<v Speaker 1>had to do it in like a text editor? Um?

0:32:26.280 --> 0:32:29.840
<v Speaker 1>I told myself to do it. Um yeah, I do.

0:32:29.960 --> 0:32:32.600
<v Speaker 1>I do that in text and my my girlfriend Kate

0:32:32.840 --> 0:32:38.240
<v Speaker 1>actually still does. She She she can type responsive web

0:32:38.320 --> 0:32:41.880
<v Speaker 1>stuff out in by hand. It's quite impressive. That is impressive.

0:32:41.920 --> 0:32:44.880
<v Speaker 1>The first web pages I ever built, which I am

0:32:44.920 --> 0:32:48.920
<v Speaker 1>not going to share, so don't even bother looking for them,

0:32:48.960 --> 0:32:51.720
<v Speaker 1>because they're awful. If they do still exist somewhere out there,

0:32:51.760 --> 0:32:55.760
<v Speaker 1>I am embarrassed by their presence. But at any rate,

0:32:55.880 --> 0:32:58.520
<v Speaker 1>I also did that the old school way, where you

0:32:58.560 --> 0:33:02.080
<v Speaker 1>had a text editor hyped in all the markup language

0:33:02.120 --> 0:33:05.720
<v Speaker 1>and the actual content of the web page. Then you

0:33:05.760 --> 0:33:08.560
<v Speaker 1>would have to save it, then open up a browser

0:33:08.560 --> 0:33:13.160
<v Speaker 1>and navigate to the the proper address of that page,

0:33:13.240 --> 0:33:15.560
<v Speaker 1>which probably wasn't even published online yet, it was just

0:33:15.680 --> 0:33:18.160
<v Speaker 1>native on your computer, look to see if it was

0:33:18.200 --> 0:33:20.880
<v Speaker 1>actually showing up properly in the web browser you were using,

0:33:22.200 --> 0:33:24.320
<v Speaker 1>and then if anything wasn't, you had to quit out,

0:33:24.360 --> 0:33:27.320
<v Speaker 1>go back into your text editor, change things there, and

0:33:27.360 --> 0:33:29.920
<v Speaker 1>do it all over again. The bad thing in the

0:33:29.920 --> 0:33:32.160
<v Speaker 1>early days is that even if you've got it to

0:33:32.200 --> 0:33:35.160
<v Speaker 1>work properly on whichever web browser you were using, there

0:33:35.200 --> 0:33:38.280
<v Speaker 1>was no guarantee that someone else's web browser, a different

0:33:38.320 --> 0:33:40.560
<v Speaker 1>web browser, was going to show it in that same way.

0:33:40.600 --> 0:33:44.840
<v Speaker 1>So you might take entire you know, hours to painstakingly

0:33:45.000 --> 0:33:48.520
<v Speaker 1>create and craft a web page, and if anyone was

0:33:48.600 --> 0:33:50.600
<v Speaker 1>using a different web browser, they might get a totally

0:33:50.640 --> 0:33:53.880
<v Speaker 1>different experience anyway, so that you don't know how easy

0:33:53.920 --> 0:33:58.520
<v Speaker 1>you've got it with your dynamic websites and your responsive designs.

0:33:58.880 --> 0:34:00.960
<v Speaker 1>You know, back in those as we were working out

0:34:00.960 --> 0:34:05.600
<v Speaker 1>how to write out tables in text editors, or there

0:34:05.640 --> 0:34:07.719
<v Speaker 1>was this one piece of software that I have been

0:34:07.800 --> 0:34:10.359
<v Speaker 1>a getting for free at some point, and it used

0:34:10.480 --> 0:34:13.680
<v Speaker 1>d HTML and it was actually it was whizzy Wig,

0:34:13.719 --> 0:34:16.480
<v Speaker 1>but it was it was like dragon drop and all

0:34:16.520 --> 0:34:19.440
<v Speaker 1>the positions were sort of relative, so you could have

0:34:19.520 --> 0:34:25.040
<v Speaker 1>objects anywhere and it was brilliant. Right for those of

0:34:25.080 --> 0:34:27.960
<v Speaker 1>you who don't remember, don't know what that acronym stands for,

0:34:28.040 --> 0:34:30.280
<v Speaker 1>it's what you see is what you get. The idea

0:34:30.360 --> 0:34:33.520
<v Speaker 1>being that you have an editor that lets you edit

0:34:34.000 --> 0:34:36.600
<v Speaker 1>within like you you were actually seeing what the web

0:34:36.600 --> 0:34:39.879
<v Speaker 1>page looks like as you're building it, so you don't

0:34:39.880 --> 0:34:43.080
<v Speaker 1>have to do this swap between code and the appearance

0:34:43.080 --> 0:34:45.239
<v Speaker 1>of the page. It's all there, like you might be able.

0:34:45.520 --> 0:34:48.239
<v Speaker 1>Most of them have an HTML editor components, so you

0:34:48.239 --> 0:34:50.880
<v Speaker 1>can switch it to HTML and just see the markup

0:34:50.960 --> 0:34:53.120
<v Speaker 1>language and type in that way if you want to.

0:34:53.640 --> 0:34:54.960
<v Speaker 1>But a lot of them have it where there are

0:34:54.960 --> 0:34:57.239
<v Speaker 1>different templates that are built out. Their entire business is

0:34:57.280 --> 0:35:00.360
<v Speaker 1>based on that, and some of them do it incredibly well.

0:35:00.920 --> 0:35:03.920
<v Speaker 1>I used them, in fact, when I'm building web pages

0:35:03.960 --> 0:35:10.160
<v Speaker 1>these days, because while I remember doing HTML coding, uh,

0:35:10.200 --> 0:35:13.120
<v Speaker 1>that was also when there were very few tags, So

0:35:14.000 --> 0:35:16.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't think I could do it today because it

0:35:16.680 --> 0:35:19.520
<v Speaker 1>would look like a website from if I were to

0:35:19.560 --> 0:35:22.719
<v Speaker 1>build one today. Uh, that way, and and while that

0:35:22.719 --> 0:35:25.640
<v Speaker 1>would be comedic, it would not be very useful. Um.

0:35:26.000 --> 0:35:28.160
<v Speaker 1>Internet Explorer three was also when we got a very

0:35:28.160 --> 0:35:31.640
<v Speaker 1>important development with I E. That is the logo of

0:35:31.680 --> 0:35:34.400
<v Speaker 1>the lower case, so that you get that icon the

0:35:34.440 --> 0:35:39.400
<v Speaker 1>lower case that represents Internet Explorer. I don't know what

0:35:39.480 --> 0:35:41.480
<v Speaker 1>our world would be like if they had gone with

0:35:41.560 --> 0:35:47.800
<v Speaker 1>something else w the web. Maybe you know it's madness,

0:35:47.840 --> 0:35:50.960
<v Speaker 1>Nate's mad Yes, that's that. That would have led to

0:35:51.960 --> 0:35:56.239
<v Speaker 1>great strife in the world. Uh. And nine days after

0:35:56.360 --> 0:36:00.000
<v Speaker 1>I E three came out, security experts discovered a backdoor

0:36:00.040 --> 0:36:04.759
<v Speaker 1>vulnerability that they called the Princeton word macro virus loophole,

0:36:04.840 --> 0:36:09.120
<v Speaker 1>so it had a very catchy name. Backdoor vulnerabilities are

0:36:09.280 --> 0:36:13.800
<v Speaker 1>seriously bad news no matter what software you're talking about.

0:36:13.800 --> 0:36:18.080
<v Speaker 1>That's the sort of vulnerability that gives an attacker access

0:36:18.120 --> 0:36:23.080
<v Speaker 1>to your machine at whatever level you are logged in at. So,

0:36:23.480 --> 0:36:28.279
<v Speaker 1>if for example, you had your Windows machine, you are

0:36:28.320 --> 0:36:31.000
<v Speaker 1>logged in as an admin on that machine. Let's say

0:36:31.000 --> 0:36:32.719
<v Speaker 1>that's the level of access you have, and if this

0:36:32.800 --> 0:36:35.440
<v Speaker 1>is your personal computer, then yes, that's the access you have.

0:36:36.760 --> 0:36:40.160
<v Speaker 1>This backdoor would give people that access, which is bad news.

0:36:40.200 --> 0:36:42.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, they could make your computer do whatever they

0:36:42.040 --> 0:36:44.640
<v Speaker 1>wanted to at that point, installed software that you didn't

0:36:45.000 --> 0:36:48.280
<v Speaker 1>intend to have installed, or direct your computer to attack

0:36:48.320 --> 0:36:51.880
<v Speaker 1>other other computers. Mostly I would just I would just

0:36:51.960 --> 0:36:57.840
<v Speaker 1>mostly open people's CD draws, print things out, leave messages

0:36:57.840 --> 0:37:01.200
<v Speaker 1>on that screen, you know, fire up the Simpsons Dust game,

0:37:01.280 --> 0:37:03.440
<v Speaker 1>that kind of stuff. I do know, I do know.

0:37:04.080 --> 0:37:07.480
<v Speaker 1>I have seen that happen. I remember seeing someone who

0:37:07.520 --> 0:37:12.640
<v Speaker 1>had UM allowed that and their c D drawer the

0:37:12.680 --> 0:37:15.640
<v Speaker 1>little the little drive door would open and close over

0:37:15.680 --> 0:37:17.040
<v Speaker 1>and over and there, like I don't know what's happening,

0:37:17.080 --> 0:37:21.000
<v Speaker 1>except what's happened is you've downloaded something you shouldn't have

0:37:21.400 --> 0:37:24.279
<v Speaker 1>that has handed over control to your computers. So we're

0:37:24.280 --> 0:37:26.839
<v Speaker 1>gonna start in safe mode and we'll begin from there

0:37:26.880 --> 0:37:29.160
<v Speaker 1>and see if we can fix this. Yeah. And and

0:37:29.239 --> 0:37:34.399
<v Speaker 1>it's still buns like buddy while we're at it. Yeah yeah, man. Well,

0:37:34.520 --> 0:37:38.399
<v Speaker 1>in all, Internet Explorer would account for about a third

0:37:38.440 --> 0:37:40.399
<v Speaker 1>of the browlser market, like I was talking about. That's

0:37:40.840 --> 0:37:43.080
<v Speaker 1>where they really started to get traction. And in nine

0:37:44.800 --> 0:37:49.480
<v Speaker 1>the n c s A stops supporting the development of Mosaic,

0:37:50.000 --> 0:37:54.120
<v Speaker 1>so the the web browser that really started all this

0:37:54.400 --> 0:37:58.879
<v Speaker 1>off in a real way had finally kind of run

0:37:58.880 --> 0:38:02.680
<v Speaker 1>out of steam on the developed inside. But the the

0:38:02.719 --> 0:38:05.720
<v Speaker 1>browsers that still use that basic technology and had continued

0:38:05.760 --> 0:38:09.000
<v Speaker 1>to develop it, they they kept going, like Netscape Navigator

0:38:09.120 --> 0:38:14.080
<v Speaker 1>continued on, although of course they had they had forked

0:38:14.360 --> 0:38:16.799
<v Speaker 1>off of the Mosaic source code, so it was not

0:38:16.960 --> 0:38:21.040
<v Speaker 1>the exact same stuff that was Mosaic. It had changed

0:38:21.080 --> 0:38:23.040
<v Speaker 1>an evolved on its own. It's kind of like if

0:38:23.080 --> 0:38:25.359
<v Speaker 1>you look at an evolutionary tree and you see where

0:38:25.360 --> 0:38:28.560
<v Speaker 1>two different species have forked same sort of thing here,

0:38:28.600 --> 0:38:32.239
<v Speaker 1>except we're talking about computer programs obviously, and n was

0:38:32.239 --> 0:38:37.120
<v Speaker 1>also in. Spyglass threatened Microsoft with a contractual audit because

0:38:37.160 --> 0:38:41.440
<v Speaker 1>of that quarterly fee royalty arrangement we talked about earlier.

0:38:41.480 --> 0:38:43.560
<v Speaker 1>The fact that they were getting this quarterly fee but

0:38:43.600 --> 0:38:47.160
<v Speaker 1>not really any royalties had kind of upset Spyglass because

0:38:47.200 --> 0:38:51.120
<v Speaker 1>they said, well, when we agreed to this, the implication

0:38:51.280 --> 0:38:54.600
<v Speaker 1>was that Internet Explorer or whatever the web browser was

0:38:54.640 --> 0:38:56.680
<v Speaker 1>going to be called at that time, was going to

0:38:56.760 --> 0:38:59.080
<v Speaker 1>be a separate product. It was gonna be something sold

0:38:59.160 --> 0:39:04.319
<v Speaker 1>by Microsoft instead of bundled with Windows UM and ended

0:39:04.400 --> 0:39:09.359
<v Speaker 1>up prompting Microsoft to settle with spy Glass. I think

0:39:09.440 --> 0:39:13.360
<v Speaker 1>the sum I see most frequently is eight million dollars,

0:39:14.120 --> 0:39:16.960
<v Speaker 1>which it's not a small amount of money, but when

0:39:16.960 --> 0:39:20.160
<v Speaker 1>you compare it to some of the huge deals going

0:39:20.200 --> 0:39:25.040
<v Speaker 1>on seemingly casually in the world of tech and especially

0:39:25.080 --> 0:39:28.880
<v Speaker 1>the world of the Internet, it's a pittance tiny mountain.

0:39:29.520 --> 0:39:33.480
<v Speaker 1>And for Microsoft, yeah, oh yes, especially for Microsoft. Eight

0:39:33.520 --> 0:39:36.840
<v Speaker 1>million dollars it's probably what they have in between the

0:39:36.880 --> 0:39:41.640
<v Speaker 1>cushions of their executive lounge couch. You just sort through

0:39:41.640 --> 0:39:44.320
<v Speaker 1>there and kind of spare eight or nine million dollars,

0:39:44.320 --> 0:39:47.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure, um, which I think, if you convert into

0:39:47.680 --> 0:39:51.680
<v Speaker 1>English currency is approximately fifteen pounds. I'm not entirely sure.

0:39:51.800 --> 0:39:53.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm not good with that sort of thing, but I

0:39:53.560 --> 0:39:55.719
<v Speaker 1>know it's like the exchange rates so old messed up.

0:39:55.719 --> 0:39:59.319
<v Speaker 1>At the moment, all I know is that whenever I

0:39:59.400 --> 0:40:04.600
<v Speaker 1>visit London and I'm always looking for deals because I

0:40:04.640 --> 0:40:07.200
<v Speaker 1>realized I don't know, I honestly don't know how much

0:40:07.200 --> 0:40:12.879
<v Speaker 1>money I'm spending right now. Um. Internet Explorer four comes

0:40:12.880 --> 0:40:17.680
<v Speaker 1>out in that is marketed with the slogan the Web

0:40:17.800 --> 0:40:21.680
<v Speaker 1>the way you want it, uh, which I guess is

0:40:22.040 --> 0:40:26.880
<v Speaker 1>true if you don't want it to be particularly good. Um.

0:40:26.880 --> 0:40:30.400
<v Speaker 1>It also handled rich text files and plain text email

0:40:30.480 --> 0:40:33.960
<v Speaker 1>in their internet mail and news program, which was now

0:40:34.440 --> 0:40:38.080
<v Speaker 1>Outlook Express for. It's called Outlook Express for, but it

0:40:38.120 --> 0:40:41.080
<v Speaker 1>really was the first Outlook Express. This is where we

0:40:41.160 --> 0:40:44.319
<v Speaker 1>run into Microsoft's habit of numbering things in a way

0:40:44.360 --> 0:40:47.239
<v Speaker 1>that probably makes sense to someone in Microsoft and no

0:40:47.320 --> 0:40:50.960
<v Speaker 1>sense to anyone else. Like, I don't know, why is

0:40:51.000 --> 0:40:53.479
<v Speaker 1>Windows ten Windows ten when it could have been Windows nine,

0:40:53.840 --> 0:40:56.399
<v Speaker 1>Apart from the fact that calling it Windows nine could

0:40:56.440 --> 0:40:59.200
<v Speaker 1>have caused some confusion with people who are running legacy

0:40:59.239 --> 0:41:03.719
<v Speaker 1>systems that store lie on Windows in an era. In

0:41:03.760 --> 0:41:06.759
<v Speaker 1>an aera, Jonathan, my friend, where we have the iPhone

0:41:07.400 --> 0:41:14.000
<v Speaker 1>five S and the Galaxy S five, I think we

0:41:14.040 --> 0:41:16.360
<v Speaker 1>are in an era where we need to have Windows

0:41:16.400 --> 0:41:21.560
<v Speaker 1>ten and OS ten. Yeah, okay, all right, I'm fine

0:41:21.560 --> 0:41:25.080
<v Speaker 1>with that, I guess I honestly, at this point we

0:41:25.080 --> 0:41:27.399
<v Speaker 1>could just say, all right, letters and numbers make no

0:41:27.520 --> 0:41:30.720
<v Speaker 1>difference in the world of the Internet, so just just

0:41:30.719 --> 0:41:34.800
<v Speaker 1>just go with it. Um, so we don't have HTML

0:41:34.880 --> 0:41:38.600
<v Speaker 1>email support and an Outlook Express for that, you could

0:41:38.640 --> 0:41:41.239
<v Speaker 1>just do rich text files and plain text emails, so

0:41:41.760 --> 0:41:45.520
<v Speaker 1>you didn't get any of the incredibly fun stuff like

0:41:45.560 --> 0:41:50.560
<v Speaker 1>people sending you pictures in the middle of their emails. Ah,

0:41:50.640 --> 0:41:54.960
<v Speaker 1>And what if you're detecting some lackluster enthusiasm in my voice,

0:41:55.040 --> 0:41:58.560
<v Speaker 1>it's because those jokes only go so far with me.

0:41:58.760 --> 0:42:02.560
<v Speaker 1>So please don't send me emails with lots of pictures

0:42:02.560 --> 0:42:05.320
<v Speaker 1>in them. But first of all, my my outlook immediately

0:42:05.320 --> 0:42:09.000
<v Speaker 1>blocks them unless I tell it to allow the photos.

0:42:09.000 --> 0:42:13.560
<v Speaker 1>But you're just wasting bandwidth. Really, um, I'm not a

0:42:13.600 --> 0:42:16.439
<v Speaker 1>huge fan of those, but but obviously makes it look

0:42:16.520 --> 0:42:18.480
<v Speaker 1>better than it would if it were just a rich

0:42:18.560 --> 0:42:22.280
<v Speaker 1>text file. And they integrated real Player as a streaming

0:42:22.280 --> 0:42:26.360
<v Speaker 1>media player within Internet Explorer. For um, do you remember

0:42:26.360 --> 0:42:30.080
<v Speaker 1>those days, Nate, where yes I do. I do, the

0:42:30.120 --> 0:42:35.040
<v Speaker 1>beautiful days of real Player playing inside Internet Explorer. Yes,

0:42:35.360 --> 0:42:38.040
<v Speaker 1>those those wonderful days. I love those days. I'll tell

0:42:38.080 --> 0:42:41.880
<v Speaker 1>you every interesting Real Player fact. Real Player used to

0:42:41.880 --> 0:42:47.319
<v Speaker 1>be brilliant, m right, real What real did was fantastic.

0:42:47.440 --> 0:42:51.120
<v Speaker 1>It actually made video stream properly back in the day.

0:42:51.719 --> 0:42:54.040
<v Speaker 1>While the player itself might have been a clunky mess,

0:42:54.120 --> 0:42:57.839
<v Speaker 1>the compression they used was genuinely some of the most

0:42:57.880 --> 0:43:02.440
<v Speaker 1>innovative online technology in my opinion. Um, The problem is

0:43:02.760 --> 0:43:06.520
<v Speaker 1>that everything else about it was awful, and bundled is

0:43:06.600 --> 0:43:09.800
<v Speaker 1>a plug in also made a clunky experience, so it

0:43:09.920 --> 0:43:13.720
<v Speaker 1>just it just always felt like a pole piece of technology.

0:43:13.760 --> 0:43:17.200
<v Speaker 1>But actually what he did was fantastic. Yeah. There was

0:43:17.239 --> 0:43:21.200
<v Speaker 1>a time where I mean I just remember so this,

0:43:21.200 --> 0:43:24.640
<v Speaker 1>this held true for very way too long, where there

0:43:24.680 --> 0:43:28.840
<v Speaker 1>were competing plugins and in order to for you to

0:43:28.840 --> 0:43:32.480
<v Speaker 1>be able to watch video online, it meant that you

0:43:32.560 --> 0:43:36.240
<v Speaker 1>had to have three or four plug ins on your browser.

0:43:36.560 --> 0:43:39.960
<v Speaker 1>Because one site would use one format, another site would

0:43:40.040 --> 0:43:43.400
<v Speaker 1>use someone be flash based, someone be uh, you know,

0:43:43.680 --> 0:43:45.720
<v Speaker 1>a real player base. You would have all these different

0:43:45.960 --> 0:43:50.719
<v Speaker 1>competing formats, and you didn't have a lot of options

0:43:51.200 --> 0:43:54.480
<v Speaker 1>of like a one player fits all kind of solutions.

0:43:54.560 --> 0:43:56.319
<v Speaker 1>So it ended up meaning that you had to add

0:43:56.320 --> 0:43:57.840
<v Speaker 1>all these different plug ins if you wanted to be

0:43:57.840 --> 0:44:00.720
<v Speaker 1>able to experience all this different media across different sites.

0:44:01.600 --> 0:44:04.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't miss those days at all. I mean Microsoft

0:44:04.520 --> 0:44:07.000
<v Speaker 1>really held onto it for a long time. Silver Light

0:44:07.239 --> 0:44:10.280
<v Speaker 1>was one of those things that when I would encounter

0:44:10.320 --> 0:44:12.759
<v Speaker 1>it online and I would see something like, oh, you

0:44:12.760 --> 0:44:14.880
<v Speaker 1>need to download silver Light to see this, I thought, really,

0:44:15.239 --> 0:44:19.399
<v Speaker 1>we are we really still there? Yeah? Can we get

0:44:19.400 --> 0:44:22.000
<v Speaker 1>beyond that? And just have everyone say, Okay, I wanted

0:44:22.040 --> 0:44:25.480
<v Speaker 1>to be the person to or the entity to define

0:44:25.560 --> 0:44:28.480
<v Speaker 1>what the standard was, but at some point I have

0:44:28.600 --> 0:44:32.600
<v Speaker 1>to admit my approach is not what has been considered standard,

0:44:32.600 --> 0:44:34.120
<v Speaker 1>and I'm going to get on board with what everyone

0:44:34.160 --> 0:44:37.480
<v Speaker 1>else is doing. It wasn't like that for a very

0:44:37.520 --> 0:44:39.120
<v Speaker 1>long time. In fact, you could argue it's still not

0:44:39.239 --> 0:44:43.319
<v Speaker 1>like that with certain types of media. But it just

0:44:43.360 --> 0:44:47.400
<v Speaker 1>made it. It made it no fun really, like you

0:44:47.440 --> 0:44:48.920
<v Speaker 1>would go to a side thing, Oh, I have to

0:44:48.960 --> 0:44:51.759
<v Speaker 1>add another place in, which again added that vulnerability. If

0:44:51.760 --> 0:44:53.560
<v Speaker 1>you had to add in plug in after plug in,

0:44:53.880 --> 0:44:57.600
<v Speaker 1>eventually you got um, you know, you got conditioned to

0:44:57.760 --> 0:44:59.319
<v Speaker 1>the point where you thought, oh, of course I'm gonna

0:44:59.360 --> 0:45:01.600
<v Speaker 1>need another plug again to see whatever this thing is.

0:45:02.320 --> 0:45:04.239
<v Speaker 1>Never mind the fact that it's a plug in that

0:45:04.320 --> 0:45:09.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't recognize and that I've never you know, heard

0:45:09.000 --> 0:45:11.240
<v Speaker 1>of before. I'll go ahead and install it, and then

0:45:11.320 --> 0:45:13.879
<v Speaker 1>you make your system vulnerable. It's just one of those

0:45:13.920 --> 0:45:17.640
<v Speaker 1>things that was a necessity at the time. And I think, really,

0:45:17.680 --> 0:45:22.759
<v Speaker 1>what what plugins did is they just fueled innovation. You know,

0:45:23.040 --> 0:45:25.480
<v Speaker 1>like a lot of what is plugging, what was a

0:45:25.520 --> 0:45:27.680
<v Speaker 1>plug in back in the day, is now either baked

0:45:27.680 --> 0:45:32.000
<v Speaker 1>into the browser or is baked into HTML itself. You know,

0:45:32.040 --> 0:45:35.600
<v Speaker 1>when you think about HTML five supporting new video formats

0:45:36.080 --> 0:45:39.400
<v Speaker 1>um you know, like web m that Google is behind.

0:45:39.680 --> 0:45:41.319
<v Speaker 1>You know, that's something that back in the day you

0:45:41.360 --> 0:45:45.959
<v Speaker 1>would need, you know, a plug in for. You don't

0:45:45.960 --> 0:45:51.640
<v Speaker 1>need those anymore, And it was probably a necessary life cycle,

0:45:52.360 --> 0:45:55.359
<v Speaker 1>that's true. I mean without it, then web pages would

0:45:55.360 --> 0:45:59.280
<v Speaker 1>be very bland and limited and would not be nearly

0:45:59.320 --> 0:46:05.000
<v Speaker 1>as important or influential as the web has become over

0:46:05.040 --> 0:46:07.879
<v Speaker 1>the years. I mean, you know, this is also we're

0:46:07.920 --> 0:46:10.439
<v Speaker 1>looking at now. We're looking at the late nineties when

0:46:10.880 --> 0:46:13.600
<v Speaker 1>we're starting to get to a fever pitch of what

0:46:13.760 --> 0:46:16.720
<v Speaker 1>the web could be, uh, you know, which of course

0:46:17.160 --> 0:46:21.760
<v Speaker 1>culminated in and then collapsed with the dot com bubble bursting.

0:46:22.560 --> 0:46:26.760
<v Speaker 1>Um that whole era, everyone was starting to see what

0:46:26.920 --> 0:46:32.200
<v Speaker 1>the web could potentially be. But if we relied simply

0:46:32.239 --> 0:46:35.080
<v Speaker 1>upon what HTML could deliver back in those days, the

0:46:35.080 --> 0:46:39.400
<v Speaker 1>web would have been a lot more you know, utilitarian

0:46:39.440 --> 0:46:43.240
<v Speaker 1>and less interesting. So I definitely agree that the plug

0:46:43.239 --> 0:46:45.600
<v Speaker 1>ins were a necessary part. It was also just as

0:46:45.800 --> 0:46:50.400
<v Speaker 1>living through it. It just was also frustrating. UM I

0:46:50.680 --> 0:46:53.359
<v Speaker 1>for also supported dynamic HTML for the first time, which

0:46:53.360 --> 0:46:56.360
<v Speaker 1>allowed for more interactive web pages. Again that rich user

0:46:56.400 --> 0:47:00.400
<v Speaker 1>experience we were talking about earlier, that was an important element,

0:47:00.880 --> 0:47:04.279
<v Speaker 1>and by bundling Internet Explorer with Windows, Microsoft ends up

0:47:04.360 --> 0:47:07.759
<v Speaker 1>leveraging itself into a sixt in market share of all

0:47:07.880 --> 0:47:10.640
<v Speaker 1>web browsers. This was a huge story to really turned

0:47:10.640 --> 0:47:15.480
<v Speaker 1>things around, going from an underdog to the major player

0:47:15.560 --> 0:47:19.200
<v Speaker 1>out of all browsers. So not just um, you know

0:47:20.520 --> 0:47:25.160
<v Speaker 1>Mozilla's or or Netscape rather uh netscapes Navigator. Now, if

0:47:25.160 --> 0:47:29.600
<v Speaker 1>you add in all the different competitors, they paled, but

0:47:29.800 --> 0:47:34.239
<v Speaker 1>it was partly because the market share for PCs far

0:47:34.280 --> 0:47:41.040
<v Speaker 1>outweighed other computer platforms, especially for businesses and casual users. UM.

0:47:41.200 --> 0:47:43.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you obviously still had a lot of Unix

0:47:43.120 --> 0:47:49.120
<v Speaker 1>machines running server software and in in various research and

0:47:49.120 --> 0:47:52.960
<v Speaker 1>and R and D areas things like that. But if

0:47:52.960 --> 0:47:55.760
<v Speaker 1>you're talking about the average person, they owned a PC.

0:47:55.880 --> 0:48:00.000
<v Speaker 1>The Mac was not a competitor really at this time. Uh.

0:48:00.080 --> 0:48:02.719
<v Speaker 1>And that meant that if you were going to buy

0:48:02.719 --> 0:48:05.360
<v Speaker 1>a PC and you had a web browser just bundled

0:48:05.360 --> 0:48:07.440
<v Speaker 1>in with it, it made sense to go ahead and

0:48:07.560 --> 0:48:09.440
<v Speaker 1>use it. In fact, for people who were not really

0:48:09.480 --> 0:48:12.840
<v Speaker 1>savvy with the web that was there. It was it

0:48:12.960 --> 0:48:14.800
<v Speaker 1>was either A O L. Was the web here in

0:48:14.880 --> 0:48:17.920
<v Speaker 1>the US, or it was an Internet to Yeah, and

0:48:18.200 --> 0:48:19.960
<v Speaker 1>it was here too. The A well, some of my

0:48:20.040 --> 0:48:24.480
<v Speaker 1>first Web experiences were h were A O L. The

0:48:24.800 --> 0:48:30.040
<v Speaker 1>World garden, yep, happy, happy times simple. Yeah. Isn't it

0:48:30.080 --> 0:48:34.560
<v Speaker 1>great when an entity that decides what is and isn't

0:48:34.600 --> 0:48:36.600
<v Speaker 1>the web for you? That makes that makes life so

0:48:36.640 --> 0:48:40.600
<v Speaker 1>much easier? So may this is where we get into

0:48:40.680 --> 0:48:44.960
<v Speaker 1>where Microsoft runs into some trouble because of this policy

0:48:45.080 --> 0:48:50.200
<v Speaker 1>of lumping Internet Explorer in with its operating system, UH,

0:48:50.360 --> 0:48:54.440
<v Speaker 1>the United States government brought a lawsuit against Microsoft Corporation.

0:48:54.480 --> 0:48:57.400
<v Speaker 1>In fact, the Department of Justice was looking at an

0:48:57.440 --> 0:49:02.360
<v Speaker 1>antitrust suit saying that the company practiced predatory strategies to

0:49:02.440 --> 0:49:05.520
<v Speaker 1>push other companies out of the web browser market and

0:49:05.560 --> 0:49:08.399
<v Speaker 1>the operating system market, as it turns out, saying that

0:49:09.000 --> 0:49:13.080
<v Speaker 1>because they had packaged Internet Explorer with the operating system,

0:49:13.080 --> 0:49:15.479
<v Speaker 1>and because the operating system was really the only game

0:49:15.520 --> 0:49:20.000
<v Speaker 1>in town for the most part, for operating systems had

0:49:20.040 --> 0:49:22.840
<v Speaker 1>the majority market share. If you were buying a PC,

0:49:23.280 --> 0:49:26.160
<v Speaker 1>more often than not, it was going to have Windows

0:49:26.200 --> 0:49:29.360
<v Speaker 1>preloaded on it. They were essentially saying you have stacked

0:49:29.360 --> 0:49:32.719
<v Speaker 1>the deck against any competing company and you're pushing them out,

0:49:32.760 --> 0:49:35.320
<v Speaker 1>and that's not fair. It's that's why we're bringing this

0:49:35.360 --> 0:49:39.279
<v Speaker 1>antitrust suit against you. This was big news, and it

0:49:39.320 --> 0:49:41.680
<v Speaker 1>wasn't the only place where Microsoft was having issues. That

0:49:41.840 --> 0:49:44.560
<v Speaker 1>it was also having problems in Europe. There were European

0:49:44.600 --> 0:49:48.080
<v Speaker 1>antitrust suits brought against Microsoft. They were actually looking at

0:49:48.200 --> 0:49:50.879
<v Speaker 1>more interesting things in a way. They were looking at

0:49:51.200 --> 0:49:54.680
<v Speaker 1>how there were also allegations that the operating system had

0:49:54.680 --> 0:49:57.560
<v Speaker 1>been designed so that it worked really well with the

0:49:57.800 --> 0:50:02.360
<v Speaker 1>Internet Explorer and bit work so well with any other browser,

0:50:03.320 --> 0:50:08.080
<v Speaker 1>almost as if Microsoft had taken pains to create an

0:50:08.120 --> 0:50:14.520
<v Speaker 1>operating system that would on purpose decrease the use and

0:50:14.640 --> 0:50:19.040
<v Speaker 1>utility of competing web browsers. And that was a huge

0:50:19.320 --> 0:50:24.120
<v Speaker 1>red flag. Um, So you had these these massive antitrust

0:50:24.160 --> 0:50:28.600
<v Speaker 1>lawsuits going up against Microsoft that wouldn't be resolved for years.

0:50:28.600 --> 0:50:34.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we all know these lawsuits can last ages. Uh,

0:50:34.120 --> 0:50:37.479
<v Speaker 1>And in fact, it wouldn't pan out in the US

0:50:37.560 --> 0:50:40.960
<v Speaker 1>until two thousand one, and there would be this enormous settlement.

0:50:41.040 --> 0:50:47.719
<v Speaker 1>And originally the ruling told Microsoft of the Department Justice said, hey,

0:50:47.760 --> 0:50:50.600
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna have to split your company into two companies.

0:50:51.000 --> 0:50:53.480
<v Speaker 1>You're gonna have to have one that is building the

0:50:53.560 --> 0:50:57.319
<v Speaker 1>operating system business and one that's building the software that

0:50:57.440 --> 0:51:00.560
<v Speaker 1>exists on top of the operating system. But they're gonna

0:51:00.600 --> 0:51:03.840
<v Speaker 1>have to operate as two separate entities, because if you

0:51:03.960 --> 0:51:06.839
<v Speaker 1>packaged them all together, you have an unfair advantage over

0:51:06.920 --> 0:51:11.440
<v Speaker 1>anyone who wants to build software for that operating system. Ultimately,

0:51:11.520 --> 0:51:14.000
<v Speaker 1>that did not happen. I mean, if you are aware

0:51:14.040 --> 0:51:17.239
<v Speaker 1>of Microsoft is a single company hasn't been split. But

0:51:17.360 --> 0:51:21.319
<v Speaker 1>that was originally what the ruling was, um, and it

0:51:21.440 --> 0:51:24.400
<v Speaker 1>was a huge It was a huge news item in

0:51:24.400 --> 0:51:27.040
<v Speaker 1>the day because anyone who wanted to use any other

0:51:27.040 --> 0:51:31.960
<v Speaker 1>web browser was already mad at Microsoft for appearing to

0:51:32.040 --> 0:51:35.640
<v Speaker 1>make it more difficult to use those web browsers. So

0:51:36.000 --> 0:51:39.799
<v Speaker 1>I remember those days well too, because already at that

0:51:39.840 --> 0:51:41.479
<v Speaker 1>point I was not a huge and like I said,

0:51:41.520 --> 0:51:44.680
<v Speaker 1>I had been using Netscape Navigator as my early web

0:51:44.680 --> 0:51:48.000
<v Speaker 1>browser for years and years, partly because when I first

0:51:48.040 --> 0:51:50.920
<v Speaker 1>started using the web, I was a college student. So

0:51:51.000 --> 0:51:53.640
<v Speaker 1>I got Netscape Navigator for free because it was a

0:51:53.680 --> 0:51:56.919
<v Speaker 1>college application, UM, I didn't have to purchase it. In fact,

0:51:56.960 --> 0:51:59.200
<v Speaker 1>I was I was pretty stingy about purchasing one for

0:51:59.239 --> 0:52:00.759
<v Speaker 1>a long time. I was like, why should I pay

0:52:00.800 --> 0:52:04.960
<v Speaker 1>for this thing that I've had for free for so long? Um,

0:52:05.000 --> 0:52:08.120
<v Speaker 1>And I didn't like the way Internet Explorer rendered web

0:52:08.160 --> 0:52:10.880
<v Speaker 1>pages or the user interface or anything. So I was

0:52:10.960 --> 0:52:13.800
<v Speaker 1>very upset at this time when I heard about about this.

0:52:14.640 --> 0:52:17.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, this was I. Internet Explorer at this point

0:52:17.160 --> 0:52:20.040
<v Speaker 1>was actually available on the Mac. This was one of

0:52:20.040 --> 0:52:22.080
<v Speaker 1>the last ones actually that was available in the Mac

0:52:22.120 --> 0:52:24.239
<v Speaker 1>I E five I think was the very last one

0:52:24.239 --> 0:52:27.640
<v Speaker 1>they made. Yeah, so you could actually you could actually

0:52:27.680 --> 0:52:30.319
<v Speaker 1>use Internet Explorer on the Macintosh at this time. Yeah.

0:52:30.800 --> 0:52:33.319
<v Speaker 1>To be fair, though, the Mac was not not what

0:52:33.360 --> 0:52:36.319
<v Speaker 1>it is today in those things this was. This is

0:52:36.360 --> 0:52:38.880
<v Speaker 1>that These are also the days where Steve jobs have

0:52:38.960 --> 0:52:41.759
<v Speaker 1>been forced out of Apple for a while and was

0:52:41.840 --> 0:52:46.120
<v Speaker 1>just starting to come back to redefine what the Mac was.

0:52:46.800 --> 0:52:49.480
<v Speaker 1>This is almost almost exactly the time he came back,

0:52:49.560 --> 0:52:53.560
<v Speaker 1>and this was just before the iMac was released, if

0:52:53.600 --> 0:52:56.640
<v Speaker 1>not almost depending on the particular part of the history

0:52:56.640 --> 0:52:59.719
<v Speaker 1>where we're on, almost month wise at the moment, this

0:52:59.800 --> 0:53:04.040
<v Speaker 1>is this is when that happened. Yeah, so we've got

0:53:04.080 --> 0:53:09.360
<v Speaker 1>this this lawsuit going on. It hasn't starts. I was

0:53:09.440 --> 0:53:14.480
<v Speaker 1>the the dominant web browser, which was not helping Microsoft's

0:53:14.520 --> 0:53:18.440
<v Speaker 1>case and that lawsuit. It was essentially being pointed at

0:53:18.480 --> 0:53:21.960
<v Speaker 1>a c if if people are complaining about how this

0:53:22.040 --> 0:53:25.760
<v Speaker 1>browser matches up against other browsers, how can you argue

0:53:25.800 --> 0:53:29.960
<v Speaker 1>that the customer satisfaction or the desire for this particular

0:53:30.000 --> 0:53:32.640
<v Speaker 1>web browsers, what's driving the dominance in the market. It's

0:53:32.680 --> 0:53:36.320
<v Speaker 1>clearly because it's tied so intricately with the upberating system.

0:53:36.360 --> 0:53:38.920
<v Speaker 1>That would be the kind of argument that the Department

0:53:38.920 --> 0:53:43.040
<v Speaker 1>of Justice would level against Microsoft. But it was I mean,

0:53:43.640 --> 0:53:47.719
<v Speaker 1>this was I at this point was just so key

0:53:47.760 --> 0:53:51.520
<v Speaker 1>to Microsoft. Yeah, it had like a thousand people working

0:53:51.520 --> 0:53:54.400
<v Speaker 1>on it at this point, just on the browser, from

0:53:54.440 --> 0:53:56.799
<v Speaker 1>from the six people of I E one to the

0:53:56.840 --> 0:54:01.440
<v Speaker 1>one thousand and a hundred million dollars being being invested

0:54:01.600 --> 0:54:06.480
<v Speaker 1>every quarter into or actually every year at this point

0:54:06.520 --> 0:54:09.439
<v Speaker 1>into Internet Explorer. This is then the I E five

0:54:09.520 --> 0:54:13.279
<v Speaker 1>days because that came out in March. Um they had

0:54:13.360 --> 0:54:16.319
<v Speaker 1>had a couple of preview versions come out. Was when

0:54:16.360 --> 0:54:20.000
<v Speaker 1>they officially launched it. Ah, this was the one that

0:54:20.000 --> 0:54:25.240
<v Speaker 1>would come with Windows second Edition as well as Windows

0:54:25.239 --> 0:54:28.080
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and the dot com boom. I mean, this

0:54:28.160 --> 0:54:32.200
<v Speaker 1>is a thousand people working on Internet Explorer, a hundred

0:54:32.280 --> 0:54:36.040
<v Speaker 1>million dollars a year. This is this is the these

0:54:36.040 --> 0:54:39.560
<v Speaker 1>are the months just before the dot com bubble burst.

0:54:40.719 --> 0:54:43.319
<v Speaker 1>And it's also this is one where if you were

0:54:43.360 --> 0:54:46.560
<v Speaker 1>a user, you probably wouldn't have noticed a huge difference

0:54:47.000 --> 0:54:50.200
<v Speaker 1>in the interface between four and five, but a lot

0:54:50.200 --> 0:54:53.000
<v Speaker 1>of the stuff that was going on behind the scenes

0:54:53.200 --> 0:54:56.279
<v Speaker 1>right the back end of the browser had been upgraded,

0:54:57.120 --> 0:55:01.120
<v Speaker 1>which prompted Paul four ought to that I E five

0:55:01.160 --> 0:55:04.279
<v Speaker 1>point oh is I E four point oh done right? So,

0:55:04.320 --> 0:55:07.879
<v Speaker 1>in other words, the the things that were innovative in

0:55:07.880 --> 0:55:10.440
<v Speaker 1>Internet Explorer four, but we're still kind of clunky. We're

0:55:10.480 --> 0:55:13.759
<v Speaker 1>now much more smooth in the new version. So I

0:55:13.840 --> 0:55:17.560
<v Speaker 1>E five was seen as a big step up, um,

0:55:17.640 --> 0:55:20.400
<v Speaker 1>and that was really important because we had this huge

0:55:21.200 --> 0:55:25.600
<v Speaker 1>boom of innovation in the dot com world, which as

0:55:25.640 --> 0:55:30.000
<v Speaker 1>we all know, was not sustainable uh long term anyway,

0:55:30.040 --> 0:55:34.200
<v Speaker 1>but it was. There was There was no greater moment

0:55:34.719 --> 0:55:38.520
<v Speaker 1>of focus in the media upon the Internet than at

0:55:38.560 --> 0:55:41.879
<v Speaker 1>this time. I would argue even today, as as instrumental

0:55:41.920 --> 0:55:44.759
<v Speaker 1>and important as the Internet is, and as we have

0:55:44.960 --> 0:55:48.440
<v Speaker 1>all these different ways of accessing it, including applications that

0:55:48.520 --> 0:55:51.160
<v Speaker 1>can work with the web or separately from the Web,

0:55:51.239 --> 0:55:54.600
<v Speaker 1>things like Twitter and Facebook. I would say that in

0:55:54.719 --> 0:55:58.440
<v Speaker 1>this time, the late nineties going right into two thousand,

0:55:58.560 --> 0:56:01.800
<v Speaker 1>that was when we were at the eek a focus

0:56:01.840 --> 0:56:06.280
<v Speaker 1>on the Internet, specifically on the World Wide Web. Um

0:56:06.360 --> 0:56:09.279
<v Speaker 1>and uh, you know this is it's funny because if

0:56:09.280 --> 0:56:10.960
<v Speaker 1>you look at the news reports from a couple of

0:56:11.040 --> 0:56:14.080
<v Speaker 1>years before this, that was when you had like the

0:56:14.080 --> 0:56:18.080
<v Speaker 1>the stuff that was caught on camera but not originally broadcast,

0:56:18.120 --> 0:56:21.239
<v Speaker 1>where you had news anchors kind of talking about what

0:56:21.440 --> 0:56:24.640
<v Speaker 1>is this web thing? What is that? What's that a

0:56:24.840 --> 0:56:30.960
<v Speaker 1>symbol for? What is email? Like it was exactly. It

0:56:31.000 --> 0:56:34.520
<v Speaker 1>went from that to everyone now has to have a website.

0:56:34.520 --> 0:56:36.600
<v Speaker 1>If you were a business, you had to have a website.

0:56:36.719 --> 0:56:38.919
<v Speaker 1>Didn't matter if you had anything important to put on there,

0:56:38.920 --> 0:56:41.520
<v Speaker 1>but you had to have a website. Um. You know

0:56:41.640 --> 0:56:44.719
<v Speaker 1>that was that was the day and and I E

0:56:44.920 --> 0:56:48.279
<v Speaker 1>five was the perfect browser at the perfect time to

0:56:48.440 --> 0:56:52.800
<v Speaker 1>really you know, tap into that, which is is good

0:56:53.640 --> 0:56:57.440
<v Speaker 1>because I E six would be at almost degree turned

0:56:57.520 --> 0:57:00.759
<v Speaker 1>from that. So so before that, just one little sad

0:57:00.800 --> 0:57:05.080
<v Speaker 1>bit of news on March two thousand, Spyglass was bought

0:57:05.080 --> 0:57:07.799
<v Speaker 1>out by Open TV, and Spyglass became no more. Now

0:57:07.840 --> 0:57:10.880
<v Speaker 1>that was, of course, the company that had licensed the

0:57:10.920 --> 0:57:15.200
<v Speaker 1>mosaic technology from the n C s A and then

0:57:15.200 --> 0:57:18.760
<v Speaker 1>further licensed it to Microsoft. It no longer existed as

0:57:18.800 --> 0:57:22.640
<v Speaker 1>a entity of its own at that point. Alright, guys,

0:57:22.680 --> 0:57:25.120
<v Speaker 1>this is where I'm going to split up the episodes.

0:57:25.200 --> 0:57:27.440
<v Speaker 1>Like Nate and I were saying, it's just way too

0:57:27.520 --> 0:57:31.120
<v Speaker 1>much information to make it a single episode. Uh, we

0:57:31.200 --> 0:57:35.880
<v Speaker 1>will continue this conversation with where Internet Explorer went from

0:57:35.880 --> 0:57:40.200
<v Speaker 1>this point forward and where it's going next, which seems

0:57:40.240 --> 0:57:43.320
<v Speaker 1>to be the end of Nowhere Street. And we'll also

0:57:43.920 --> 0:57:48.000
<v Speaker 1>talk about the successor to Internet Explorer. And it's a

0:57:48.120 --> 0:57:53.520
<v Speaker 1>name that I just learned today because when we recorded

0:57:53.520 --> 0:57:56.640
<v Speaker 1>the episode, Microsoft had not yet announced it. But we

0:57:56.760 --> 0:58:01.400
<v Speaker 1>now know that Project Spartan is Microsoft. We'll talk about

0:58:01.440 --> 0:58:03.640
<v Speaker 1>that more in the next episode two, although we'll still

0:58:03.640 --> 0:58:05.520
<v Speaker 1>be using the word Spartan because I can't go back

0:58:05.520 --> 0:58:08.480
<v Speaker 1>to time and fix that anyway. If you have any

0:58:08.520 --> 0:58:11.080
<v Speaker 1>suggestions for future episodes of Text Stuff, whether it is

0:58:11.080 --> 0:58:14.000
<v Speaker 1>a specific topic, a guest I could have on the show,

0:58:15.280 --> 0:58:18.600
<v Speaker 1>guest host that you love to have here on Tech

0:58:18.680 --> 0:58:21.480
<v Speaker 1>Stuff with me let me know, Send me an email

0:58:21.800 --> 0:58:24.760
<v Speaker 1>said addresses tech stuff at how stuff works dot com,

0:58:24.880 --> 0:58:27.920
<v Speaker 1>or drop me a line on Facebook or Twitter or

0:58:28.000 --> 0:58:31.080
<v Speaker 1>Tumbler at all three, I am tech Stuff H s W.

0:58:31.280 --> 0:58:39.520
<v Speaker 1>And we'll talk to you again really soon. For more

0:58:39.520 --> 0:58:42.160
<v Speaker 1>on this and thousands of other topics is how stuff

0:58:42.160 --> 0:58:52.240
<v Speaker 1>works dot com