WEBVTT - Beyond Unprecedented Times

0:00:11.720 --> 0:00:14.720
<v Speaker 1>Good morning, peeps, and welcome to wok F Daily with

0:00:14.840 --> 0:00:19.080
<v Speaker 1>Meet your Girl Daniel Moody. Pre recording from the Home

0:00:19.160 --> 0:00:24.680
<v Speaker 1>Bunker during our holiday rest week. Folks, as we wind

0:00:24.760 --> 0:00:28.880
<v Speaker 1>down the last seven years of bringing you WOKF, I've

0:00:28.960 --> 0:00:35.199
<v Speaker 1>wanted to give you some of our best of Revisit

0:00:35.280 --> 0:00:38.559
<v Speaker 1>these conversations that I think are really important for us

0:00:38.600 --> 0:00:41.520
<v Speaker 1>to hold on to as we trudge our way into

0:00:41.600 --> 0:00:44.879
<v Speaker 1>this brand new world. Donald Trump in a couple of

0:00:44.920 --> 0:00:48.720
<v Speaker 1>weeks is going to be sworn in as a forty

0:00:48.760 --> 0:00:52.120
<v Speaker 1>seventh president of these United States, and he was most

0:00:52.200 --> 0:00:56.040
<v Speaker 1>likely will be the last democratically elected president of these

0:00:56.160 --> 0:00:59.600
<v Speaker 1>United States. And so I thought it was important to

0:01:00.280 --> 0:01:04.600
<v Speaker 1>go back to a conversation that I had with our

0:01:04.680 --> 0:01:09.959
<v Speaker 1>friend gentalb about Donald Trump running for office in the

0:01:10.000 --> 0:01:14.800
<v Speaker 1>first place as a twice impeached former president with multiple indictments,

0:01:15.360 --> 0:01:20.080
<v Speaker 1>and recognizing that we have long since left precedented times.

0:01:21.000 --> 0:01:24.600
<v Speaker 1>This is not normal. And I think that it's so important,

0:01:24.840 --> 0:01:29.720
<v Speaker 1>folks to remind ourselves of that, because they want to

0:01:29.880 --> 0:01:33.800
<v Speaker 1>make the abnormal seem normal. They want to make it

0:01:33.880 --> 0:01:39.400
<v Speaker 1>seem okay that a white supremac apologist, a man that's

0:01:39.480 --> 0:01:43.280
<v Speaker 1>multiple has multiple indictments, a man that said, can you

0:01:43.360 --> 0:01:45.600
<v Speaker 1>do me a favor though, A man that's been accused

0:01:45.640 --> 0:01:49.240
<v Speaker 1>of sexual harassment and adjudicated for rape, a man that

0:01:50.160 --> 0:01:54.520
<v Speaker 1>has called Mexicans rapists and murderers, that said that black

0:01:54.520 --> 0:01:57.680
<v Speaker 1>people come from shithole countries. A man that has ripped

0:01:57.680 --> 0:02:01.920
<v Speaker 1>families away from each other and pledges to do mass

0:02:01.960 --> 0:02:05.960
<v Speaker 1>deportations in his second term. None of this is normal,

0:02:06.440 --> 0:02:09.960
<v Speaker 1>and we should never normalize it. We should never allow

0:02:10.040 --> 0:02:13.800
<v Speaker 1>ourselves to just say, well, you know, it is what

0:02:13.880 --> 0:02:17.959
<v Speaker 1>it is. We have to remember our power in these moments.

0:02:18.240 --> 0:02:22.160
<v Speaker 1>We have to remember our light in these episodes of darkness,

0:02:22.720 --> 0:02:26.799
<v Speaker 1>and we have to remember to remember who we are.

0:02:27.240 --> 0:02:31.240
<v Speaker 1>So in this conversation with Gentobb that we revisit, we

0:02:31.280 --> 0:02:35.079
<v Speaker 1>talk about all the ways that this isn't the America

0:02:35.560 --> 0:02:38.400
<v Speaker 1>that we want to be living in, and so what

0:02:38.520 --> 0:02:43.760
<v Speaker 1>do we do. Take a listen, folks, I am always

0:02:43.760 --> 0:02:49.320
<v Speaker 1>so happy when one of my friends, fellow nerd Avenger,

0:02:49.840 --> 0:02:53.480
<v Speaker 1>just fellow colleague in the space, who loses their mind.

0:02:54.000 --> 0:02:57.880
<v Speaker 1>Regular bathists try to keep direct with the news cycle.

0:02:57.960 --> 0:03:02.639
<v Speaker 1>Gentib joins Okay daily. You know her. She's a law

0:03:02.639 --> 0:03:05.399
<v Speaker 1>professor and the author of Big Dirty money and other

0:03:05.440 --> 0:03:09.280
<v Speaker 1>people's houses. And she is the host of Booked Up

0:03:09.360 --> 0:03:12.120
<v Speaker 1>with Gen Tobb, Jen.

0:03:13.639 --> 0:03:14.320
<v Speaker 2>Danielle.

0:03:14.440 --> 0:03:19.640
<v Speaker 1>Where to begin in all honesty in the legal landscape

0:03:20.120 --> 0:03:25.920
<v Speaker 1>or minefield that is America these days? But because I

0:03:25.919 --> 0:03:30.440
<v Speaker 1>don't have my medication present, let's not talk about the

0:03:30.480 --> 0:03:34.960
<v Speaker 1>Supreme Court, shall we? Let's just talk about the Donald Trump.

0:03:36.800 --> 0:03:43.080
<v Speaker 1>But so here's what we know. Judge Aileen Cannon, who

0:03:43.200 --> 0:03:47.240
<v Speaker 1>should have recused herself but didn't and is still overseeing

0:03:48.280 --> 0:03:51.760
<v Speaker 1>Jack Smith's documents case against Donald Trump. Folks. I know

0:03:51.800 --> 0:03:53.560
<v Speaker 1>that there are so many cases, so it's hard to

0:03:53.640 --> 0:03:56.680
<v Speaker 1>keep track, but let us start with the document's case

0:03:57.800 --> 0:04:01.960
<v Speaker 1>has set a court date for May twenty fourth, I

0:04:02.040 --> 0:04:06.800
<v Speaker 1>believe twenty twenty four. Uh so five twenty four, twenty four,

0:04:06.960 --> 0:04:11.720
<v Speaker 1>ha ha on us, Jen, what do you make of

0:04:11.960 --> 0:04:17.640
<v Speaker 1>Aileen Cannon's moves thus far? Uh? In this in this

0:04:17.839 --> 0:04:23.160
<v Speaker 1>case and whether or not we will we'll see pushback

0:04:23.480 --> 0:04:26.000
<v Speaker 1>from the Department of Justice by way of Jack Smith

0:04:26.240 --> 0:04:28.440
<v Speaker 1>because he said he was ready to go in December.

0:04:28.720 --> 0:04:32.479
<v Speaker 1>We knew that that was unlikely. But but where what

0:04:32.520 --> 0:04:35.760
<v Speaker 1>are you thinking so far about her moves and then

0:04:35.800 --> 0:04:37.560
<v Speaker 1>the timing of this trial?

0:04:38.240 --> 0:04:42.000
<v Speaker 2>Well, in my past life, Danielle, Like I don't know,

0:04:42.120 --> 0:04:46.680
<v Speaker 2>pre COVID, pre Trump, and even maybe up until a

0:04:46.680 --> 0:04:49.040
<v Speaker 2>few weeks ago, I tend to be a glass half

0:04:49.400 --> 0:04:54.440
<v Speaker 2>full person. Now I'm a the glass has been smashed

0:04:54.520 --> 0:04:58.720
<v Speaker 2>into pieces against the wall and I'm just drinking coffee

0:04:59.160 --> 0:05:03.560
<v Speaker 2>straight from straight became the staff, you know, kind of person.

0:05:04.000 --> 0:05:07.680
<v Speaker 2>So but that being set, I am trying to find

0:05:08.040 --> 0:05:13.320
<v Speaker 2>the silver lining in the storm cloud that Eileen Cannon

0:05:13.360 --> 0:05:18.599
<v Speaker 2>has created for the future of democracy. Because May twenty four,

0:05:18.839 --> 0:05:22.000
<v Speaker 2>there's only one good two good things about that date.

0:05:22.120 --> 0:05:26.600
<v Speaker 2>One that's literally the last I think, like the last day,

0:05:26.720 --> 0:05:30.360
<v Speaker 2>like when grades are due spring semester for my classes,

0:05:30.400 --> 0:05:32.920
<v Speaker 2>so like I will be done teaching. So if that's

0:05:32.960 --> 0:05:36.719
<v Speaker 2>going to take over all of my time, I'm ready.

0:05:36.800 --> 0:05:40.160
<v Speaker 2>That's but you know, that's the one good thing, hardly

0:05:40.279 --> 0:05:42.360
<v Speaker 2>enough to recommend the date.

0:05:42.400 --> 0:05:43.320
<v Speaker 1>But the other good.

0:05:43.120 --> 0:05:46.279
<v Speaker 2>Thing is it is so far out there as a

0:05:46.279 --> 0:05:52.760
<v Speaker 2>preliminary date that I'm hoping that Jack Smith is ready

0:05:52.800 --> 0:05:57.520
<v Speaker 2>to go on the insurrection case on the January sixth case,

0:05:57.520 --> 0:06:00.560
<v Speaker 2>that we expect to be charged any day now, and

0:06:00.560 --> 0:06:04.520
<v Speaker 2>that a judge in DC sees it as perfect timing.

0:06:04.520 --> 0:06:07.600
<v Speaker 2>There's no In other words, The reason why, as you know,

0:06:08.320 --> 0:06:11.159
<v Speaker 2>that the Justice Department pushed out the date to December

0:06:11.279 --> 0:06:14.479
<v Speaker 2>from the judge's original summer date, which wasn't going to happen,

0:06:15.040 --> 0:06:18.440
<v Speaker 2>was because there's some complications around how to share top

0:06:18.480 --> 0:06:22.279
<v Speaker 2>secret type documents that will not be the case in

0:06:22.480 --> 0:06:27.440
<v Speaker 2>the January sixth indictment, you know. And I think the

0:06:27.560 --> 0:06:32.320
<v Speaker 2>Justice Department has brought hundreds of cases involving the rioters

0:06:33.279 --> 0:06:37.320
<v Speaker 2>and has already the benefit of, as you know, the

0:06:37.960 --> 0:06:42.440
<v Speaker 2>special Committee investigating the attack on the Capitol. They have

0:06:42.640 --> 0:06:47.040
<v Speaker 2>done incredible amounts of work even before this Special Council

0:06:47.080 --> 0:06:50.000
<v Speaker 2>got involved. I think they're ready to go one day

0:06:50.040 --> 0:06:53.400
<v Speaker 2>in DT. So my hope is they ask for a

0:06:53.440 --> 0:07:00.320
<v Speaker 2>November date October even for that case. The yeah and

0:07:00.320 --> 0:07:03.920
<v Speaker 2>the only, the only true other than the selfish motive,

0:07:04.000 --> 0:07:06.919
<v Speaker 2>the only true good thing about May twenty fourth is

0:07:06.920 --> 0:07:09.680
<v Speaker 2>it gives the opportunity a wide open field to bring

0:07:09.720 --> 0:07:13.360
<v Speaker 2>the most important case against this guy, which is trying

0:07:13.360 --> 0:07:16.080
<v Speaker 2>to stage a coup to stay in office and the

0:07:16.240 --> 0:07:22.760
<v Speaker 2>you know, ongoing lie that that is associated with all that,

0:07:23.000 --> 0:07:25.480
<v Speaker 2>all the time between the November election when he lost,

0:07:25.880 --> 0:07:29.520
<v Speaker 2>through the attack on the Capitol and his role all

0:07:29.560 --> 0:07:32.800
<v Speaker 2>of that is feeding into his campaign and the undermining

0:07:32.880 --> 0:07:35.880
<v Speaker 2>of what little we have left of our democratic institution.

0:07:36.160 --> 0:07:40.240
<v Speaker 2>So that's the bright note. Now, if there I am

0:07:40.280 --> 0:07:44.840
<v Speaker 2>hoping he asks for October or November or December date.

0:07:45.040 --> 0:07:47.840
<v Speaker 2>If Jack Smith doesn't, you know, I give up. I

0:07:47.920 --> 0:07:49.480
<v Speaker 2>really do. I don't know what to tell you.

0:07:50.760 --> 0:07:53.640
<v Speaker 1>So, I mean, we have a couple of things that

0:07:53.720 --> 0:07:59.600
<v Speaker 1>are brewing right and I think one of them is

0:07:59.640 --> 0:08:04.080
<v Speaker 1>the fact that on Donald Trump's broke ass Twitter that

0:08:04.160 --> 0:08:07.240
<v Speaker 1>I refer to, I guess he truth's on there. I

0:08:07.280 --> 0:08:10.640
<v Speaker 1>don't really know what one does on that apparatus, but

0:08:11.400 --> 0:08:12.840
<v Speaker 1>on that application.

0:08:12.520 --> 0:08:12.680
<v Speaker 2>But.

0:08:14.720 --> 0:08:18.160
<v Speaker 1>You know, he sent out a real ominous and threatening

0:08:19.200 --> 0:08:24.120
<v Speaker 1>video the other day which was basically saying, if you

0:08:24.280 --> 0:08:27.880
<v Speaker 1>come for us, will come for you. We're not afraid.

0:08:28.600 --> 0:08:32.320
<v Speaker 1>You know which, Jen, I'm no lawyer. That's why I

0:08:32.360 --> 0:08:36.280
<v Speaker 1>have you on the show. But he seems to be

0:08:39.120 --> 0:08:44.560
<v Speaker 1>doing the same exact things that he did prior to

0:08:44.679 --> 0:08:50.000
<v Speaker 1>January sixth. With the rollout of these indictments, you know,

0:08:50.080 --> 0:08:54.960
<v Speaker 1>he sends up a flare, all of mainstream media jumps

0:08:55.040 --> 0:08:58.559
<v Speaker 1>on the Trump train right, giving him once again all

0:08:58.760 --> 0:09:02.840
<v Speaker 1>just the free press that he he uses that attention to.

0:09:02.960 --> 0:09:06.840
<v Speaker 1>Then send out threats to Jack Smith and to others,

0:09:06.880 --> 0:09:14.640
<v Speaker 1>and then sends out this video basically another digital stand

0:09:14.679 --> 0:09:20.080
<v Speaker 1>back and stand by. So tell me how these kinds

0:09:20.120 --> 0:09:24.320
<v Speaker 1>of things can be used in a court of law

0:09:26.440 --> 0:09:27.160
<v Speaker 1>that he's doing.

0:09:28.559 --> 0:09:32.760
<v Speaker 2>I think once there is an indictment, assuming there is one,

0:09:32.840 --> 0:09:40.040
<v Speaker 2>and there's a judge assigned, that judge can issue in

0:09:40.120 --> 0:09:45.880
<v Speaker 2>theory a kind of gag order related to specifically making

0:09:46.440 --> 0:09:53.160
<v Speaker 2>threats to the prosecutor specifically related to other kind of

0:09:54.400 --> 0:09:57.920
<v Speaker 2>I would say incitement activity. And the question is, you know,

0:09:57.960 --> 0:09:59.920
<v Speaker 2>will the judge, Will the judge do that?

0:10:00.880 --> 0:10:01.000
<v Speaker 1>Uh?

0:10:01.480 --> 0:10:05.040
<v Speaker 2>You know, the the he's gotten away with so much

0:10:05.840 --> 0:10:09.000
<v Speaker 2>and a judge has to be careful in what they

0:10:09.040 --> 0:10:11.920
<v Speaker 2>do because if they're not going to actually enforce in order,

0:10:13.120 --> 0:10:16.080
<v Speaker 2>then it becomes a victory for him. You know, what

0:10:16.120 --> 0:10:18.199
<v Speaker 2>does that look like in other words, of a judge

0:10:18.200 --> 0:10:22.160
<v Speaker 2>makes an order and then do some sort of contempt

0:10:22.400 --> 0:10:24.920
<v Speaker 2>citation against them, is you know, is he going to

0:10:24.920 --> 0:10:28.000
<v Speaker 2>actually bring him into court? You know, we saw similar

0:10:28.080 --> 0:10:33.320
<v Speaker 2>activity during the Carol two trial. It was Carol two

0:10:33.400 --> 0:10:36.880
<v Speaker 2>because it was brought second even though charged, you know,

0:10:36.960 --> 0:10:41.240
<v Speaker 2>she filed the the defamation and sexual assault case. This

0:10:41.360 --> 0:10:43.560
<v Speaker 2>was the second case, even though it went first and

0:10:43.640 --> 0:10:46.200
<v Speaker 2>there were things that you know, the Donald Trump was

0:10:46.240 --> 0:10:49.720
<v Speaker 2>doing on Twitter, and the judge I was in the courtroom,

0:10:49.800 --> 0:10:52.280
<v Speaker 2>you know, said to his lawyers, you got to talk

0:10:52.320 --> 0:10:55.640
<v Speaker 2>to your client, and sometimes he took down what he

0:10:55.720 --> 0:10:58.960
<v Speaker 2>was saying off Twitter. But then when he continued that

0:10:59.000 --> 0:11:01.240
<v Speaker 2>behavior after he lost the case, now that's become part

0:11:01.320 --> 0:11:04.240
<v Speaker 2>of the next case. I mean, Carol want it's been

0:11:04.280 --> 0:11:06.120
<v Speaker 2>added to that case against him. Now this is all

0:11:06.160 --> 0:11:10.920
<v Speaker 2>about a civil case. Right, You're more concerned about him

0:11:11.160 --> 0:11:15.520
<v Speaker 2>stand back, stand by kind of language actually creating violence.

0:11:15.880 --> 0:11:19.880
<v Speaker 2>I remain a little bit less concerned because when he

0:11:20.160 --> 0:11:25.319
<v Speaker 2>was indicted his first federal indictment as opposed to the

0:11:26.320 --> 0:11:31.120
<v Speaker 2>Manhattan DA indictment, the first federal grand jury indictment, we

0:11:31.160 --> 0:11:35.559
<v Speaker 2>didn't see that much support for him around the courthouse

0:11:35.600 --> 0:11:40.720
<v Speaker 2>in Florida. Now I realized this is probably this is

0:11:40.760 --> 0:11:42.960
<v Speaker 2>different because these are the same people, right, this is

0:11:42.960 --> 0:11:45.280
<v Speaker 2>all about But however, there are a lot of people

0:11:45.360 --> 0:11:49.280
<v Speaker 2>who were charged and either serve time or are going

0:11:49.320 --> 0:11:53.840
<v Speaker 2>to serve time, who feel abandoned by Donald Trump, in

0:11:53.880 --> 0:11:56.440
<v Speaker 2>other words, he so they may not come and also

0:11:56.520 --> 0:11:59.360
<v Speaker 2>they may themselves not want to get arrested again. So

0:11:59.400 --> 0:12:02.319
<v Speaker 2>we've got to think about that. So I don't know

0:12:02.320 --> 0:12:03.679
<v Speaker 2>if you're if you're worried.

0:12:04.600 --> 0:12:08.199
<v Speaker 1>You know, the thing is, I wasn't stating that as

0:12:08.200 --> 0:12:11.000
<v Speaker 1>a way to say that I'm worried that his words

0:12:11.559 --> 0:12:14.760
<v Speaker 1>will incite the same type of violence as January sixth.

0:12:15.360 --> 0:12:20.360
<v Speaker 1>It was really about whether or not the prosecution can

0:12:20.440 --> 0:12:25.160
<v Speaker 1>show a pattern of behavior and did yeah, a pattern

0:12:25.200 --> 0:12:32.120
<v Speaker 1>of behavior and basic intent with his continued language. Now

0:12:32.960 --> 0:12:38.480
<v Speaker 1>you could have yeah, because my thought was if Donald Trump,

0:12:38.559 --> 0:12:41.680
<v Speaker 1>let's say, had been a normal human being and you're

0:12:41.800 --> 0:12:45.439
<v Speaker 1>caught doing something and then you decide I'm going to

0:12:45.520 --> 0:12:48.880
<v Speaker 1>back away from that said behavior so that my attorneys

0:12:48.920 --> 0:12:51.440
<v Speaker 1>can say that this was an isolated event, caught up

0:12:51.480 --> 0:12:55.600
<v Speaker 1>in passion, whatever bullshit kind of you know, defense is

0:12:55.640 --> 0:12:58.680
<v Speaker 1>going to be created. You could say that that was

0:12:58.720 --> 0:13:03.360
<v Speaker 1>an isolated of it. But over the last few years

0:13:03.440 --> 0:13:07.960
<v Speaker 1>since January sixth, we've watched Donald Trump continue to use

0:13:08.040 --> 0:13:18.400
<v Speaker 1>social media as a way to either virtually assault people, right,

0:13:19.120 --> 0:13:21.840
<v Speaker 1>make them a target in an attack, the same way

0:13:21.880 --> 0:13:30.960
<v Speaker 1>that he did with the voting staff in uh in Georgia. Right.

0:13:31.360 --> 0:13:34.760
<v Speaker 1>And so my question really is like, how is the process,

0:13:34.800 --> 0:13:40.000
<v Speaker 1>how do you feel, how can the prosecution use Donald

0:13:40.040 --> 0:13:44.280
<v Speaker 1>Trump's continued behavior or there for their case.

0:13:44.360 --> 0:13:46.199
<v Speaker 2>Yes, so it's more of a legal analysis that you're

0:13:46.200 --> 0:13:49.920
<v Speaker 2>asking me for. So yeah, So two ways. One if

0:13:50.160 --> 0:13:52.880
<v Speaker 2>they if the prosecution wants to bring in evidence like

0:13:52.920 --> 0:13:55.080
<v Speaker 2>as a pattern of behavior this is how he tries

0:13:55.120 --> 0:14:01.400
<v Speaker 2>to obstruct and try to stir up violence. In terms

0:14:01.440 --> 0:14:04.120
<v Speaker 2>of admitting evidence that his lawyers are obviously going to

0:14:04.200 --> 0:14:06.319
<v Speaker 2>want to exclude that kind of evidence, and they want

0:14:06.360 --> 0:14:09.320
<v Speaker 2>to narrow what a jury can hear, right, And so

0:14:09.400 --> 0:14:13.400
<v Speaker 2>the tension in our rules of federal rules of evidence is,

0:14:13.720 --> 0:14:15.959
<v Speaker 2>first of all, only things that are considered relevant can

0:14:15.960 --> 0:14:18.600
<v Speaker 2>be admitted. This would obviously, you know, I think it's

0:14:18.640 --> 0:14:22.680
<v Speaker 2>relevant to his intent and so on. So but the

0:14:22.720 --> 0:14:25.000
<v Speaker 2>next thing is and of course the other side, his

0:14:25.040 --> 0:14:27.360
<v Speaker 2>defense will say it's not. But even if a judge

0:14:27.360 --> 0:14:29.720
<v Speaker 2>thinks it's relevant, the judge then has to decide whether

0:14:30.600 --> 0:14:35.440
<v Speaker 2>something is two what's called too prejudicial to be probative.

0:14:36.200 --> 0:14:39.440
<v Speaker 2>It's this concept of you know, for example, when a

0:14:39.480 --> 0:14:44.800
<v Speaker 2>defendant is trial for a particular let's say, you know,

0:14:44.880 --> 0:14:49.040
<v Speaker 2>breaking into a grocery store to steal formula for their

0:14:49.120 --> 0:14:52.720
<v Speaker 2>kid or something. God forbid, we prosecute for that, you know,

0:14:52.800 --> 0:14:57.040
<v Speaker 2>whether they had been caught doing, you know, shoplifting something

0:14:57.040 --> 0:14:59.680
<v Speaker 2>else at a different time. You know, if a jury

0:14:59.680 --> 0:15:01.920
<v Speaker 2>gets to hear the other shoplifting, it's going to make

0:15:01.960 --> 0:15:04.160
<v Speaker 2>them think, oh, this is a bad person. I'm going

0:15:04.240 --> 0:15:06.600
<v Speaker 2>to convict them. And so the defense is going to

0:15:06.640 --> 0:15:08.280
<v Speaker 2>want to say, you know, that's not really relevant. What

0:15:08.320 --> 0:15:13.520
<v Speaker 2>they were shoplifting before was you know, I don't know Amazon,

0:15:13.920 --> 0:15:16.120
<v Speaker 2>you know, gift cards or whatever, and that just has

0:15:16.160 --> 0:15:20.480
<v Speaker 2>nothing to do with this. However, you know, the idea

0:15:20.520 --> 0:15:22.520
<v Speaker 2>would be, well, if the way that this person did

0:15:22.520 --> 0:15:24.800
<v Speaker 2>this was similar, then we can look for a pattern

0:15:24.880 --> 0:15:27.280
<v Speaker 2>of behavior. But the idea is it's relevant because it

0:15:27.280 --> 0:15:29.160
<v Speaker 2>shows this person has the intent to take things that

0:15:29.160 --> 0:15:32.760
<v Speaker 2>aren't theirs. But a lot of judges would exclude that earlier,

0:15:33.880 --> 0:15:36.800
<v Speaker 2>that earlier evidence because they would say, you know, that's

0:15:36.840 --> 0:15:40.360
<v Speaker 2>going to make a jury try him for being a

0:15:40.440 --> 0:15:42.600
<v Speaker 2>bad person, and we don't do that in America. You're

0:15:42.600 --> 0:15:45.440
<v Speaker 2>supposed to be tried for your your actual offenses. So

0:15:45.640 --> 0:15:47.920
<v Speaker 2>it's going to really be up to what a jury,

0:15:47.920 --> 0:15:49.960
<v Speaker 2>what the judge is, and how the judge rules. So

0:15:50.000 --> 0:15:52.400
<v Speaker 2>that's going to be an evidentiary battle. The second way, though,

0:15:52.440 --> 0:15:57.080
<v Speaker 2>I think is interesting, is if his tweeting or his

0:15:57.240 --> 0:16:00.200
<v Speaker 2>it's not even tweeting xing, or his his what that

0:16:00.240 --> 0:16:03.880
<v Speaker 2>we call him now is true thing whatever, if his

0:16:03.960 --> 0:16:10.600
<v Speaker 2>public statements are directed toward this particular case, and it

0:16:10.600 --> 0:16:14.120
<v Speaker 2>could be seen as trying to influence witnesses or tamper

0:16:14.200 --> 0:16:19.240
<v Speaker 2>with them, or somehow create threats against physical or other

0:16:19.280 --> 0:16:22.360
<v Speaker 2>threats against jurors or the court. That could be its

0:16:22.400 --> 0:16:26.080
<v Speaker 2>own kind of separate case, you know. And I don't

0:16:26.080 --> 0:16:28.360
<v Speaker 2>know if you saw this, but the other day I

0:16:28.400 --> 0:16:30.880
<v Speaker 2>saw like it was it Mike Huckabee. Did you see

0:16:30.880 --> 0:16:33.080
<v Speaker 2>this thing going around on threads like he put up?

0:16:33.280 --> 0:16:35.000
<v Speaker 2>It could have been on true social maybe it was

0:16:35.000 --> 0:16:37.840
<v Speaker 2>an interview on the news, But what I saw is

0:16:37.920 --> 0:16:41.280
<v Speaker 2>he was on air or something saying the most important

0:16:41.400 --> 0:16:45.760
<v Speaker 2>values are loyalty, and he was like saying it was

0:16:45.800 --> 0:16:48.240
<v Speaker 2>a very weird, like if you don't get it, like

0:16:48.280 --> 0:16:52.680
<v Speaker 2>they're all out there sending signals for people to not

0:16:52.680 --> 0:16:56.960
<v Speaker 2>not squeal, you know, not rat out the mob boss.

0:16:57.440 --> 0:17:01.800
<v Speaker 2>And the closer he gets to this prospect of being

0:17:02.040 --> 0:17:06.120
<v Speaker 2>convicted for something in federal court, maybe he believes jail time,

0:17:06.200 --> 0:17:08.320
<v Speaker 2>which I don't think would happen. But the closer he

0:17:08.359 --> 0:17:11.000
<v Speaker 2>gets to that, the more desperate his moves will become.

0:17:11.080 --> 0:17:13.040
<v Speaker 2>And so I think we should keep our eye on

0:17:13.160 --> 0:17:14.639
<v Speaker 2>both both avenues.

0:17:16.840 --> 0:17:21.960
<v Speaker 1>So let's now take a little trip down south to Georgia,

0:17:22.640 --> 0:17:27.159
<v Speaker 1>right where we are waiting yet and again, folks, you

0:17:27.200 --> 0:17:30.199
<v Speaker 1>know Jen and I are having this conversation at a

0:17:30.240 --> 0:17:33.960
<v Speaker 1>time when they're when you know, we're doing our best

0:17:33.960 --> 0:17:36.320
<v Speaker 1>to read the tea leaves and shake a magic eight ball,

0:17:36.440 --> 0:17:38.560
<v Speaker 1>but we have no idea when and if these things

0:17:38.600 --> 0:17:41.520
<v Speaker 1>are actually coming down the pike. My assumption is yes,

0:17:41.560 --> 0:17:45.000
<v Speaker 1>it is why from Georgia because Fani Willis had sent

0:17:45.119 --> 0:17:48.160
<v Speaker 1>up a flair months ago telling us that between July

0:17:48.400 --> 0:17:53.520
<v Speaker 1>and September for law enforcement to prepare, so we know

0:17:53.640 --> 0:18:01.000
<v Speaker 1>that those things are are underway. Part of Jen I

0:18:01.040 --> 0:18:07.440
<v Speaker 1>guess the rumors that are circulating is that Fannie Willis

0:18:07.480 --> 0:18:13.040
<v Speaker 1>the DA in Georgia could potentially be looking at racketeering charges.

0:18:13.560 --> 0:18:17.760
<v Speaker 1>So Jen, talk to us about this, what if this big?

0:18:17.760 --> 0:18:22.760
<v Speaker 1>What if that we don't know yet? Why would this

0:18:22.840 --> 0:18:24.080
<v Speaker 1>be a BFD.

0:18:25.600 --> 0:18:30.560
<v Speaker 2>Well, it would be a BFD because of what activity

0:18:30.720 --> 0:18:35.720
<v Speaker 2>you can scoop up once you decide something is racketeering

0:18:35.840 --> 0:18:40.720
<v Speaker 2>or a racketeering conspiracy. So there is a federal RICO law,

0:18:41.640 --> 0:18:45.520
<v Speaker 2>and there are than state ones. And the people think

0:18:45.560 --> 0:18:51.280
<v Speaker 2>of RICO racketeering Influenced Corrupt Organizations Act law. They think

0:18:51.320 --> 0:18:55.520
<v Speaker 2>of it as being something to get organized crime. But

0:18:55.600 --> 0:18:58.520
<v Speaker 2>that's not the only thing it can be used for.

0:18:59.040 --> 0:19:05.440
<v Speaker 2>And the idea with racketeering is that you uh the law,

0:19:05.600 --> 0:19:08.320
<v Speaker 2>whether it's the Georgia one or the federal one, is

0:19:08.359 --> 0:19:17.280
<v Speaker 2>designed to criminalize, to create, criminalize a pattern of racketeering activity.

0:19:17.600 --> 0:19:19.760
<v Speaker 2>So that's how the language works. And then you have

0:19:19.800 --> 0:19:22.439
<v Speaker 2>to say, well, what is racketeering activity and what is

0:19:22.440 --> 0:19:25.080
<v Speaker 2>a pattern? Well, racketeering activity at the federal level is

0:19:25.080 --> 0:19:27.000
<v Speaker 2>a little bit different at the state the federal level.

0:19:27.240 --> 0:19:30.040
<v Speaker 2>The reason why RICO was established is so that you

0:19:30.080 --> 0:19:33.600
<v Speaker 2>could turn into a federal crime or a pattern of

0:19:33.720 --> 0:19:39.199
<v Speaker 2>state criminal behavior, so as well as a series of

0:19:39.240 --> 0:19:42.560
<v Speaker 2>different federal crimes, so that we call them predicate offenses.

0:19:42.640 --> 0:19:45.919
<v Speaker 2>So all of a sudden, someone who's just committing crimes

0:19:46.720 --> 0:19:49.879
<v Speaker 2>like doing you know, black met or bribery or shaking

0:19:49.880 --> 0:19:53.280
<v Speaker 2>people down, or murder. At the state level, you know,

0:19:53.400 --> 0:19:56.000
<v Speaker 2>murdering people, you could now say, well, murder's usually a

0:19:56.040 --> 0:20:00.000
<v Speaker 2>state offense. But now if it's a pattern of racketeering activity,

0:20:00.040 --> 0:20:03.479
<v Speaker 2>if it's a if you have an enterprise, which is,

0:20:03.800 --> 0:20:07.159
<v Speaker 2>you know, a group of two or more people working

0:20:07.200 --> 0:20:10.520
<v Speaker 2>together to commit a series of murders, now all of

0:20:10.560 --> 0:20:12.440
<v Speaker 2>a sudden, instead of just a state crime, you could

0:20:12.520 --> 0:20:14.679
<v Speaker 2>charge that at the federal level, right or kidnapping, So

0:20:14.720 --> 0:20:18.399
<v Speaker 2>think of that. That's the federal way. Similarly, things like

0:20:19.040 --> 0:20:23.280
<v Speaker 2>wirefraud or counterfeiting or all kinds of other federal offenses.

0:20:23.320 --> 0:20:25.280
<v Speaker 2>If someone is a pattern of it, if you've called

0:20:25.760 --> 0:20:28.399
<v Speaker 2>you call it a pattern of racketeering activity. Now what

0:20:28.440 --> 0:20:31.280
<v Speaker 2>you've done, If you've said, okay, Danielle, if you're at

0:20:31.320 --> 0:20:33.560
<v Speaker 2>the hub of this group, if you're in charge of

0:20:34.040 --> 0:20:37.800
<v Speaker 2>you know this activity. You if you set up this

0:20:37.880 --> 0:20:41.280
<v Speaker 2>sort of racketeering enterprise and you're either making money or

0:20:41.320 --> 0:20:45.600
<v Speaker 2>benefiting from this kind of behavior, even if you were

0:20:45.600 --> 0:20:50.200
<v Speaker 2>not involved in all these underlying things, if you're part

0:20:50.280 --> 0:20:54.000
<v Speaker 2>of this rico enterprise, you now can be tagged with

0:20:54.040 --> 0:20:56.399
<v Speaker 2>all this other stuff. It's a way of creating a

0:20:56.440 --> 0:20:59.919
<v Speaker 2>web around a sort of amorphous activity where you cannot see.

0:21:00.359 --> 0:21:02.399
<v Speaker 2>So let's put Donald Trump at the center of this,

0:21:02.520 --> 0:21:05.280
<v Speaker 2>and let's look at the let's look at the efforts

0:21:05.320 --> 0:21:11.320
<v Speaker 2>to change the vote count in Georgia. The reason why racketeering, Now,

0:21:11.400 --> 0:21:14.200
<v Speaker 2>let's look at the state level. The reason why racketeering

0:21:14.240 --> 0:21:17.840
<v Speaker 2>would be helpful is if if Rico at the state,

0:21:17.960 --> 0:21:20.920
<v Speaker 2>at the Georgia level, is also criminalizing a pattern of

0:21:21.000 --> 0:21:24.480
<v Speaker 2>racketeering activity. Rico at the Georgia level has a whole

0:21:24.480 --> 0:21:28.639
<v Speaker 2>bunch of other types of crimes, state crimes, and some

0:21:28.720 --> 0:21:32.280
<v Speaker 2>of those are the you know, the activities that people

0:21:32.480 --> 0:21:35.320
<v Speaker 2>like Giuliani and anyone he.

0:21:35.480 --> 0:21:37.760
<v Speaker 1>Was working with Graham, Lindsey Graham.

0:21:37.560 --> 0:21:40.159
<v Speaker 2>Or maybe any of the electors. And so all of

0:21:40.200 --> 0:21:41.760
<v Speaker 2>a sudden, you have all these people doing all these

0:21:41.800 --> 0:21:45.600
<v Speaker 2>different activities that were all furthering the efforts of Donald

0:21:45.600 --> 0:21:49.080
<v Speaker 2>Trump to overturn the election in Georgia. And Rico helps

0:21:49.119 --> 0:21:51.280
<v Speaker 2>because you might if you cannot find a phone call

0:21:51.480 --> 0:21:53.760
<v Speaker 2>where every single person who did bad things in this

0:21:53.840 --> 0:21:56.679
<v Speaker 2>puzzle was told by Donald Trump to do it, it

0:21:56.720 --> 0:22:01.639
<v Speaker 2>doesn't really matter. Creating this Rico theory, Rico enterprise, you

0:22:01.640 --> 0:22:04.800
<v Speaker 2>could now create liability for him. I don't know if

0:22:04.840 --> 0:22:06.520
<v Speaker 2>that makes sense to you. That's what I'm trying to

0:22:06.520 --> 0:22:10.280
<v Speaker 2>So that's why it's sort of a big deal, and

0:22:10.800 --> 0:22:15.240
<v Speaker 2>you know it just it just as layers of liability

0:22:15.800 --> 0:22:18.440
<v Speaker 2>and just yet another crime. And it also sounds bad.

0:22:18.720 --> 0:22:21.960
<v Speaker 2>But remember he already settled Rico State Rico charges with

0:22:22.040 --> 0:22:26.480
<v Speaker 2>his fake university. You know, it's not like he hasn't

0:22:26.520 --> 0:22:28.639
<v Speaker 2>been tagged with RICO before. I just think people like,

0:22:29.040 --> 0:22:31.399
<v Speaker 2>they think it sounds they think it sounds scary. But

0:22:31.440 --> 0:22:33.879
<v Speaker 2>the other thing is that Fawnie Willis has had success

0:22:34.800 --> 0:22:37.800
<v Speaker 2>using the Georgia Rico statute before. Wasn't she involved in

0:22:37.880 --> 0:22:42.119
<v Speaker 2>the whole thing about teachers cheating helping students cheat on exams? Yes,

0:22:42.440 --> 0:22:43.679
<v Speaker 2>So again, when you have.

0:22:44.320 --> 0:22:47.439
<v Speaker 1>An organized crime ring, it doesn't need to be a mob.

0:22:47.520 --> 0:22:50.840
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't need to be a mob association. Hollywood has

0:22:50.880 --> 0:22:52.919
<v Speaker 1>allowed us to make that connection, but that is not

0:22:53.000 --> 0:22:56.879
<v Speaker 1>the only connection that it has. And if we're looking

0:22:56.920 --> 0:22:59.359
<v Speaker 1>and we're talking about all the ways in which Donald

0:22:59.359 --> 0:23:04.560
<v Speaker 1>Trump has a legal tsunami against him, it is to

0:23:04.640 --> 0:23:07.560
<v Speaker 1>pull back and say, this is an organized crime ring

0:23:08.640 --> 0:23:12.000
<v Speaker 1>that has engulfed an entire political party. And there are

0:23:12.040 --> 0:23:15.480
<v Speaker 1>many mechanisms, much in the same way that you know,

0:23:17.040 --> 0:23:20.800
<v Speaker 1>organized crime members have different hands in different jars.

0:23:21.320 --> 0:23:24.280
<v Speaker 2>And what's super interesting is when you say organized crime ring.

0:23:24.560 --> 0:23:27.400
<v Speaker 2>What becomes super interesting is how is the ring defined,

0:23:27.600 --> 0:23:29.879
<v Speaker 2>who's in it right and who's not in it right,

0:23:30.440 --> 0:23:34.359
<v Speaker 2>because that will tell us more about you know, who

0:23:34.560 --> 0:23:38.159
<v Speaker 2>flipped who didn't based on whether they're charged or not.

0:23:38.240 --> 0:23:39.479
<v Speaker 2>And you know, we've got to go back to that

0:23:40.040 --> 0:23:43.440
<v Speaker 2>to remember this special grand jury report, when that woman

0:23:43.960 --> 0:23:47.760
<v Speaker 2>was making the rounds, who was absolutely giddy going on television. Yeah,

0:23:47.880 --> 0:23:49.679
<v Speaker 2>so she told us, you know, there are not going

0:23:49.720 --> 0:23:52.000
<v Speaker 2>to be any plot twists. There are lots of people's names.

0:23:52.080 --> 0:23:54.199
<v Speaker 2>We're not going to be surprised to see them. You know,

0:23:54.440 --> 0:23:55.720
<v Speaker 2>I would like to see those.

0:23:57.960 --> 0:24:01.199
<v Speaker 1>Lastly, Jen, just to think about all the ways in

0:24:01.280 --> 0:24:05.520
<v Speaker 1>which for a normal person the walls would be closing

0:24:05.560 --> 0:24:09.840
<v Speaker 1>in and this would just amount to, you know, guilty

0:24:09.920 --> 0:24:12.240
<v Speaker 1>verdict after guilty verdict. But we know that in the

0:24:12.320 --> 0:24:15.880
<v Speaker 1>America that we live in, where rich, white, cis hetero men,

0:24:16.560 --> 0:24:18.800
<v Speaker 1>very rarely are held to account, let alone those that

0:24:18.840 --> 0:24:22.000
<v Speaker 1>were former presidents of the United States. I want to

0:24:22.000 --> 0:24:24.719
<v Speaker 1>turn your attention to Michigan for a moment and the

0:24:24.760 --> 0:24:32.199
<v Speaker 1>sixteen sixteen Republican of fake electors who were caught up

0:24:32.240 --> 0:24:38.560
<v Speaker 1>in that scheme, who were charged with felonies for their

0:24:38.920 --> 0:24:43.000
<v Speaker 1>quote for their role in the alleged false elector's scheme.

0:24:43.440 --> 0:24:46.679
<v Speaker 1>How does that? How does what is happening in Michigan

0:24:47.800 --> 0:24:52.600
<v Speaker 1>tie in to what is happening in Georgia and as

0:24:52.640 --> 0:24:58.120
<v Speaker 1>a larger part of this overall twenty twenty scheme by

0:24:58.200 --> 0:24:59.160
<v Speaker 1>Trump and company.

0:25:00.359 --> 0:25:02.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean it tells me. I mean, first of all,

0:25:02.359 --> 0:25:05.320
<v Speaker 2>I'm so proud of the women from my home state.

0:25:06.280 --> 0:25:09.320
<v Speaker 2>You know, you know, we don't come to play. I

0:25:09.359 --> 0:25:13.560
<v Speaker 2>mean I recognize, I recognize those women as people that

0:25:14.880 --> 0:25:16.840
<v Speaker 2>some people I grew up with him that I admire.

0:25:17.359 --> 0:25:19.439
<v Speaker 2>And what it tells me is a couple of things.

0:25:21.640 --> 0:25:26.639
<v Speaker 2>In Michigan, the Attorney General, Dana Nessel took this case

0:25:26.760 --> 0:25:30.480
<v Speaker 2>back after she had referred it over to Merrick Garland.

0:25:31.680 --> 0:25:34.600
<v Speaker 2>So remember Merrick Garland, you know, as in my view,

0:25:35.560 --> 0:25:38.960
<v Speaker 2>was not in a big hurry to do justice when

0:25:38.960 --> 0:25:42.240
<v Speaker 2>it came to anything Donald Trump was involved in. And

0:25:42.320 --> 0:25:45.720
<v Speaker 2>only when he announced his plan to run for office

0:25:46.040 --> 0:25:49.640
<v Speaker 2>does he appoint Jack Smith. And only I think shortly

0:25:49.720 --> 0:25:53.280
<v Speaker 2>after maybe they found those documents at Biden's house? Did that?

0:25:53.640 --> 0:25:54.840
<v Speaker 2>Do you even do that? Like he should have a

0:25:54.920 --> 0:25:57.199
<v Speaker 2>pointed some long time ago, and he also should have

0:25:57.240 --> 0:26:00.399
<v Speaker 2>done something about the flake collectors in Michigan and the

0:26:00.400 --> 0:26:03.240
<v Speaker 2>other states. And so I admired Dana Nessel for saying,

0:26:03.240 --> 0:26:05.520
<v Speaker 2>you know what, I don't have to wait forever. I'm

0:26:05.520 --> 0:26:08.679
<v Speaker 2>going to bring this case. And she, you know, she

0:26:08.800 --> 0:26:13.320
<v Speaker 2>brought this case against these against these these people. It

0:26:13.400 --> 0:26:16.320
<v Speaker 2>was sixteen of them, and the kinds of charges she

0:26:16.440 --> 0:26:20.240
<v Speaker 2>used were ordinary state charges. I love this one. One

0:26:20.280 --> 0:26:23.439
<v Speaker 2>crime called uttering and publishing. When I worked in the

0:26:23.440 --> 0:26:25.800
<v Speaker 2>courthouses when I was a teenager and I had some

0:26:25.800 --> 0:26:29.080
<v Speaker 2>summer jobs, they're uttering publishing was something you charge people

0:26:29.119 --> 0:26:30.680
<v Speaker 2>with if they wrote a bad check. It's kind of

0:26:30.720 --> 0:26:33.960
<v Speaker 2>any kind of sort of false written statement. Others were

0:26:34.040 --> 0:26:38.679
<v Speaker 2>charged with, you know, other charges included for each of

0:26:38.720 --> 0:26:43.399
<v Speaker 2>them election law forgery, and these are these are serious,

0:26:43.800 --> 0:26:47.560
<v Speaker 2>serious felonies. These are you know, when they're at this level,

0:26:47.600 --> 0:26:49.520
<v Speaker 2>when it's not just passing a bad check, when it's

0:26:49.720 --> 0:26:53.880
<v Speaker 2>actually trying to falsify the electoral slate and and and

0:26:53.960 --> 0:26:58.280
<v Speaker 2>you know, give an opportunity for overturning a lawful election.

0:26:58.320 --> 0:27:02.800
<v Speaker 2>We're talking about fourteen years for each of these offenses.

0:27:02.840 --> 0:27:05.280
<v Speaker 2>There's like one, two, three, four, or five, like six

0:27:05.359 --> 0:27:10.280
<v Speaker 2>different felonies here in several counts each to My hope

0:27:10.320 --> 0:27:15.399
<v Speaker 2>is that other states, not just Georgia and Michigan where

0:27:15.440 --> 0:27:20.159
<v Speaker 2>this was going on, the prosecutors decide that they're not

0:27:20.200 --> 0:27:23.440
<v Speaker 2>going to wait around for the federal government. Jacksonith's obviously

0:27:23.560 --> 0:27:26.520
<v Speaker 2>very busy at this point and whatever else he's not

0:27:26.600 --> 0:27:29.280
<v Speaker 2>working on, I wouldn't leave it to Merrick Garland, and

0:27:29.320 --> 0:27:30.440
<v Speaker 2>hopefully they step up.

0:27:31.160 --> 0:27:34.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean, but isn't that just a fucking travesty that, like,

0:27:35.560 --> 0:27:39.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, in Merrick Garland's attempt to not play politics,

0:27:39.880 --> 0:27:44.160
<v Speaker 1>to restore integrity into an institution, That's exactly what he's

0:27:44.200 --> 0:27:47.080
<v Speaker 1>been doing. That's exactly what he's done. And what we

0:27:47.200 --> 0:27:49.680
<v Speaker 1>know to be true is that if Donald Trump had

0:27:49.720 --> 0:27:54.720
<v Speaker 1>not announced his run for reelection, then Merrick Garland would

0:27:54.720 --> 0:27:57.320
<v Speaker 1>have done absolutely nothing.

0:27:58.280 --> 0:28:00.000
<v Speaker 2>You know, if it weren't for I think the big

0:28:00.240 --> 0:28:02.880
<v Speaker 2>in addition to that, one hundred percent agree, I think

0:28:02.960 --> 0:28:05.680
<v Speaker 2>the biggest game changer was the testimony.

0:28:05.200 --> 0:28:06.880
<v Speaker 1>Of Cassidy Hutchinsons.

0:28:07.560 --> 0:28:11.240
<v Speaker 2>And yet again, you know, look, there's you know, people,

0:28:11.720 --> 0:28:15.480
<v Speaker 2>people who are closest to the activity, who don't have

0:28:15.600 --> 0:28:18.399
<v Speaker 2>fancy titles, always know what's going on in this world.

0:28:18.720 --> 0:28:21.760
<v Speaker 2>But here she is, this young woman and not only

0:28:21.760 --> 0:28:24.040
<v Speaker 2>did they not take her seriously, they tried to destroy her,

0:28:25.080 --> 0:28:28.240
<v Speaker 2>you know, afterward. And you know, my question for you is,

0:28:28.280 --> 0:28:31.239
<v Speaker 2>why did she go Why did her lawyers when they

0:28:31.280 --> 0:28:34.040
<v Speaker 2>decided to seek her own counsel, why did they feel

0:28:34.359 --> 0:28:37.320
<v Speaker 2>safe going to the commission, and why did they not

0:28:37.480 --> 0:28:41.440
<v Speaker 2>go to the Justice Department first? And there's a reason. Yeah,

0:28:41.440 --> 0:28:46.239
<v Speaker 2>because I you know, and I don't know. I I

0:28:46.280 --> 0:28:48.760
<v Speaker 2>have a lot, you know, I'm very disappointed. I you know,

0:28:48.800 --> 0:28:51.160
<v Speaker 2>as you know, I believe a special counsel should have

0:28:51.200 --> 0:28:55.640
<v Speaker 2>been appointed right away at the outset. But we're where

0:28:55.680 --> 0:28:58.360
<v Speaker 2>we are. But if there had been a special counsel

0:28:58.440 --> 0:29:02.240
<v Speaker 2>appointed the minute Marek Garland was sworn in in March

0:29:02.400 --> 0:29:05.040
<v Speaker 2>of twenty twenty one, we may have actually had some

0:29:05.160 --> 0:29:07.760
<v Speaker 2>trials by now. This is ridiculous.

0:29:07.960 --> 0:29:10.440
<v Speaker 1>That's not what they's not that's not what they wanted,

0:29:10.520 --> 0:29:11.640
<v Speaker 1>and that's not what he wanted.

0:29:13.640 --> 0:29:17.160
<v Speaker 2>But we're really it's a terrible situation for the country

0:29:17.200 --> 0:29:20.440
<v Speaker 2>to be in. You know, I'm not someone who's who's

0:29:20.520 --> 0:29:23.720
<v Speaker 2>happy that Donald Trump is going to most likely be

0:29:24.320 --> 0:29:27.680
<v Speaker 2>the candidate for the Republican Party, because they all know

0:29:27.920 --> 0:29:30.360
<v Speaker 2>the only way that he can win is if there's

0:29:30.360 --> 0:29:33.360
<v Speaker 2>a third party candidate. I mean, that's how Bill Clinton won.

0:29:33.720 --> 0:29:37.320
<v Speaker 2>Ross Perot was there. It's very hard, even under normal circumstances,

0:29:37.360 --> 0:29:40.920
<v Speaker 2>for anyone to either party to win the presidential election

0:29:41.080 --> 0:29:44.040
<v Speaker 2>the way the electoral College is set up, in the

0:29:44.080 --> 0:29:46.560
<v Speaker 2>way our country has always been divided. And now we're

0:29:46.600 --> 0:29:49.600
<v Speaker 2>in a real danger of Donald Trump being re elected.

0:29:50.040 --> 0:29:54.080
<v Speaker 2>And you know, I blame that on the Justice Department

0:29:55.680 --> 0:29:57.560
<v Speaker 2>because and I'm not saying it because this is not

0:29:57.600 --> 0:29:59.760
<v Speaker 2>a partisan issue. I'm saying someone who tried to overthrow

0:29:59.760 --> 0:30:04.040
<v Speaker 2>the election should not be running again. And and that

0:30:04.280 --> 0:30:07.280
<v Speaker 2>is if you don't if you don't understand that, then

0:30:07.320 --> 0:30:10.080
<v Speaker 2>you really don't know what you're doing in your job.

0:30:10.160 --> 0:30:12.360
<v Speaker 2>And I don't understand how that was in his priority

0:30:12.440 --> 0:30:13.080
<v Speaker 2>day one.

0:30:14.560 --> 0:30:16.920
<v Speaker 1>Honestly, that is a that is a question that I

0:30:16.920 --> 0:30:19.680
<v Speaker 1>don't think we'll ever have an answer to, my friend,

0:30:20.600 --> 0:30:24.920
<v Speaker 1>but we will have to leave it here today. Genob,

0:30:25.200 --> 0:30:27.200
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for making the time to join

0:30:27.560 --> 0:30:32.040
<v Speaker 1>wo KF read some tea leaves with me here because

0:30:32.160 --> 0:30:35.480
<v Speaker 1>Lord only knows what's coming. But I'm sure it's not good.

0:30:36.280 --> 0:30:39.880
<v Speaker 1>But but I'm sure we'll have you back to unpack

0:30:39.920 --> 0:30:42.320
<v Speaker 1>it all when it does come to fruish.

0:30:42.400 --> 0:30:45.240
<v Speaker 2>Well, I'm glad that you say that, because it's nothing good.

0:30:45.640 --> 0:30:48.479
<v Speaker 2>It's going to happen in this space, if something even small,

0:30:48.640 --> 0:30:54.000
<v Speaker 2>even the essence of something good, I guess yeah, then

0:30:54.080 --> 0:30:56.360
<v Speaker 2>I can you know, have a little a little rejoicing.

0:30:56.440 --> 0:31:05.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, Oh we'll see. That is it for me today,

0:31:05.160 --> 0:31:09.200
<v Speaker 1>Dear friends on Woke af AS always, power to the

0:31:09.240 --> 0:31:12.720
<v Speaker 1>people and to all the people. Power, get woke and

0:31:12.840 --> 0:31:14.240
<v Speaker 1>stay woke as fuck.