WEBVTT - Reid Hoffman ON: The Entrepreneur’s Mindset & Why What Got You Here Won’t Get You There

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:01.440
<v Speaker 1>You don't really say well, I just want to get

0:00:01.440 --> 0:00:03.040
<v Speaker 1>a yes, and it's like, well, you're not going to

0:00:03.120 --> 0:00:04.960
<v Speaker 1>just get a yes, especially if you have something that's

0:00:05.000 --> 0:00:07.080
<v Speaker 1>bold and original, different, because a bunch of people are

0:00:07.080 --> 0:00:09.159
<v Speaker 1>gonna say, well, I don't get it right, Like, you know,

0:00:09.200 --> 0:00:10.920
<v Speaker 1>like I don't get that people will want to buy

0:00:11.039 --> 0:00:13.920
<v Speaker 1>flavored water without sugar. I don't get that. You know,

0:00:13.920 --> 0:00:16.119
<v Speaker 1>there's all of these things that we go into on

0:00:16.280 --> 0:00:19.120
<v Speaker 1>master's of scale to say. Actually, in fact, sometimes when

0:00:19.120 --> 0:00:20.880
<v Speaker 1>you get a bunch of people who say I don't

0:00:20.920 --> 0:00:30.680
<v Speaker 1>get it, that's precisely when you have something that's gold. Hey. Everyone,

0:00:30.800 --> 0:00:34.120
<v Speaker 1>welcome back to On Purpose, the number one health podcast

0:00:34.360 --> 0:00:36.479
<v Speaker 1>in the world. Thanks to each and every single one

0:00:36.520 --> 0:00:40.000
<v Speaker 1>of you that come back every week to listen, learn

0:00:40.120 --> 0:00:42.520
<v Speaker 1>and grow. Now you know that I don't take your

0:00:42.560 --> 0:00:45.479
<v Speaker 1>ears for granted. I'm grateful that you take out so

0:00:45.560 --> 0:00:48.560
<v Speaker 1>much time out of your days to listen and learn,

0:00:48.640 --> 0:00:51.000
<v Speaker 1>whether you're walking your dog, or you're at the gym,

0:00:51.120 --> 0:00:54.000
<v Speaker 1>or whether you're driving to and from work or wherever

0:00:54.080 --> 0:00:56.680
<v Speaker 1>you are right now. Thank you for choosing on Purpose.

0:00:57.120 --> 0:01:00.960
<v Speaker 1>And this is a conversation that I've been excited to

0:01:01.000 --> 0:01:04.679
<v Speaker 1>have for a very long time. Today, I'm speaking to

0:01:04.800 --> 0:01:09.280
<v Speaker 1>none other than Read Hoffman. Now, Read is an accomplished entrepreneur,

0:01:09.480 --> 0:01:12.640
<v Speaker 1>and that is an understatement. He's an investor. He has

0:01:12.680 --> 0:01:15.800
<v Speaker 1>played an integral role in building many of today's leading

0:01:15.800 --> 0:01:18.959
<v Speaker 1>consumer technology businesses. He's, of course, the co founder of

0:01:19.040 --> 0:01:22.679
<v Speaker 1>LinkedIn and an investor at Gray Luck. He's the host

0:01:22.720 --> 0:01:25.680
<v Speaker 1>of his own podcast, Masters of Scale, So you're going

0:01:25.720 --> 0:01:28.600
<v Speaker 1>to see a master at work today, an original podcast

0:01:28.640 --> 0:01:32.000
<v Speaker 1>series and the first American media program to commit to

0:01:32.040 --> 0:01:35.720
<v Speaker 1>a fifty fifty gender balance for featured guests. He's the

0:01:35.800 --> 0:01:38.840
<v Speaker 1>co author of four best selling books, The Startup of You,

0:01:39.080 --> 0:01:42.960
<v Speaker 1>The Alliance, Blitz Scaling, and his newest book with the

0:01:43.000 --> 0:01:47.880
<v Speaker 1>same name of his podcast, Masters of Scale, Surprising Truths

0:01:48.000 --> 0:01:52.440
<v Speaker 1>from the world's most successful entrepreneurs. Read. Welcome to on Purpose,

0:01:52.760 --> 0:01:55.400
<v Speaker 1>and thank you for being here. It's great to be here.

0:01:55.440 --> 0:01:58.480
<v Speaker 1>I love your show. I've listened to it, you know,

0:01:58.640 --> 0:02:02.120
<v Speaker 1>as much as I listened to podcast including my own right,

0:02:02.160 --> 0:02:04.640
<v Speaker 1>which is every moment I have time for and if

0:02:04.640 --> 0:02:07.920
<v Speaker 1>I had a little bit more commutes outside of the pandemic,

0:02:08.160 --> 0:02:11.799
<v Speaker 1>I think my listening to all of these quality podcasts

0:02:11.840 --> 0:02:15.520
<v Speaker 1>most centrally yours. That's so kind read, I'm humbled and

0:02:15.560 --> 0:02:18.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm touched, and the feeling is mutuo. I love your

0:02:18.840 --> 0:02:21.000
<v Speaker 1>podcast too, and that's what I was just thanking you

0:02:21.040 --> 0:02:26.000
<v Speaker 1>offline that I'm so grateful that you've synthesized all of

0:02:26.040 --> 0:02:29.480
<v Speaker 1>this incredible wisdom from all the phenomenal people you've interviewed

0:02:29.760 --> 0:02:33.520
<v Speaker 1>into a book that we can easily look at, read,

0:02:33.639 --> 0:02:37.240
<v Speaker 1>skip to chapters, look at challenges, understand stories, and as

0:02:37.240 --> 0:02:39.440
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about before, what I love about the book

0:02:40.040 --> 0:02:43.120
<v Speaker 1>is that it's the stories, it's the psychology, it's the tips,

0:02:43.160 --> 0:02:46.480
<v Speaker 1>it's the insight, it's everything. It's this very three sixty

0:02:46.520 --> 0:02:50.200
<v Speaker 1>degree approach. But read, I want to start with your

0:02:50.240 --> 0:02:54.519
<v Speaker 1>life not as an entrepreneur, but as an employee and

0:02:54.760 --> 0:02:58.160
<v Speaker 1>your first paying job as an editor at a gaming company,

0:02:58.440 --> 0:03:01.120
<v Speaker 1>and you also wanted to become a professor, which makes

0:03:01.160 --> 0:03:05.480
<v Speaker 1>me think you were gearing up to be an employee

0:03:05.639 --> 0:03:09.840
<v Speaker 1>either of a school or an incredible faculty, and of

0:03:09.840 --> 0:03:12.840
<v Speaker 1>course you did as a gaming company. When did the

0:03:12.919 --> 0:03:18.560
<v Speaker 1>idea of entrepreneurship first spark your intrigue and curiosity and

0:03:19.120 --> 0:03:22.480
<v Speaker 1>how much were you already convinced you were going to

0:03:22.480 --> 0:03:24.600
<v Speaker 1>be an entrepreneur or were you always thinking you were

0:03:24.600 --> 0:03:26.960
<v Speaker 1>going to be an employee. So I don't think the

0:03:27.080 --> 0:03:30.200
<v Speaker 1>category of employee or entrepreneur had actually really occurred to me.

0:03:30.320 --> 0:03:32.080
<v Speaker 1>I always think in terms of projects. I always think

0:03:32.200 --> 0:03:34.359
<v Speaker 1>in terms of what the work is, what the activity,

0:03:34.400 --> 0:03:37.040
<v Speaker 1>what you're building, And I don't think it was until

0:03:37.160 --> 0:03:39.360
<v Speaker 1>years later. I don't think it was until years into

0:03:39.400 --> 0:03:41.760
<v Speaker 1>LinkedIn that I was like, all right, entrepreneur is the

0:03:41.800 --> 0:03:44.720
<v Speaker 1>word that describes the activity that I'm doing. Like it

0:03:44.760 --> 0:03:46.920
<v Speaker 1>wasn't really like I'm going to be an entrepreneur, that's

0:03:46.920 --> 0:03:48.960
<v Speaker 1>really It was more like what do you build? What

0:03:49.040 --> 0:03:51.240
<v Speaker 1>do you fashion? And that was you know, all the

0:03:51.240 --> 0:03:53.280
<v Speaker 1>way back to you know, great research. Not that many

0:03:53.280 --> 0:03:55.120
<v Speaker 1>people know that I kind of you know, talked my

0:03:55.160 --> 0:03:57.200
<v Speaker 1>way into the door of a gaming company when I

0:03:57.200 --> 0:04:00.480
<v Speaker 1>was twelve and then ended up doing some work for them, so,

0:04:00.720 --> 0:04:03.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, good research for that. But that was because

0:04:03.160 --> 0:04:05.120
<v Speaker 1>I was interested in fantasy role playing games, you know,

0:04:05.200 --> 0:04:07.240
<v Speaker 1>dungeons and dragons, and I was like, this is what

0:04:07.240 --> 0:04:08.680
<v Speaker 1>I want to spend my time doing. So I want

0:04:08.680 --> 0:04:10.360
<v Speaker 1>to get in that door, and I want to connect

0:04:10.360 --> 0:04:12.200
<v Speaker 1>with the people who were doing this. And then you know,

0:04:12.280 --> 0:04:14.600
<v Speaker 1>kind of similarly, and then I think I became an

0:04:14.680 --> 0:04:19.280
<v Speaker 1>entrepreneur because when I started thinking about the company, the

0:04:20.880 --> 0:04:22.560
<v Speaker 1>impact that I wanted to have in the world, the

0:04:22.600 --> 0:04:25.000
<v Speaker 1>way that I wanted, the insights that I thought I

0:04:25.040 --> 0:04:27.599
<v Speaker 1>had that could be operationalized. You know, it was coming

0:04:27.640 --> 0:04:30.240
<v Speaker 1>about from the very earliest days of the Internet, and

0:04:30.360 --> 0:04:33.120
<v Speaker 1>with the various earliest days of the internet, was how

0:04:33.120 --> 0:04:35.359
<v Speaker 1>do we live in this medium by which all of

0:04:35.400 --> 0:04:38.320
<v Speaker 1>us as individuals and as groups were made better off?

0:04:38.360 --> 0:04:41.200
<v Speaker 1>And what kind of products can you create there? And

0:04:41.360 --> 0:04:43.440
<v Speaker 1>when I looked at kind of like what were the

0:04:43.480 --> 0:04:46.680
<v Speaker 1>things I could possibly join, none of them had that

0:04:46.839 --> 0:04:49.360
<v Speaker 1>kind of shape of what I wanted to create. And

0:04:49.400 --> 0:04:52.400
<v Speaker 1>so that made me an entrepreneur. And I wasn't reluctant,

0:04:52.520 --> 0:04:55.719
<v Speaker 1>but I was completely focused on this is the future

0:04:55.760 --> 0:04:58.160
<v Speaker 1>that I want to build, and so you know that

0:04:58.279 --> 0:05:02.120
<v Speaker 1>naturally more more naturally alligned with entrepreneurship. What I love

0:05:02.160 --> 0:05:06.760
<v Speaker 1>about that, reader is that not having these buckets, almost

0:05:06.800 --> 0:05:10.080
<v Speaker 1>of thought of saying I have to choose actually helped

0:05:10.080 --> 0:05:13.120
<v Speaker 1>you find the right path. And I think often we

0:05:13.480 --> 0:05:16.520
<v Speaker 1>put these very binary black and white choices in front

0:05:16.520 --> 0:05:18.240
<v Speaker 1>of people and we say, or do you want to

0:05:18.240 --> 0:05:20.360
<v Speaker 1>work for someone or do you want to be an entrepreneur,

0:05:20.839 --> 0:05:24.279
<v Speaker 1>and in one sense, they're both the wrong questions. It

0:05:24.360 --> 0:05:26.599
<v Speaker 1>seems like the right question, as you said, is to

0:05:26.600 --> 0:05:29.400
<v Speaker 1>be project focused, is to thinking about what you actually

0:05:29.400 --> 0:05:31.760
<v Speaker 1>want to do or what you want to build, and

0:05:31.920 --> 0:05:35.240
<v Speaker 1>which home allows you to build that more successfully, which

0:05:35.279 --> 0:05:38.080
<v Speaker 1>I think is a brilliant insight. So I really appreciate that.

0:05:38.720 --> 0:05:41.920
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to understand, though, when you started your first company,

0:05:42.040 --> 0:05:46.600
<v Speaker 1>social Net, could you share with us the mistakes that

0:05:46.640 --> 0:05:52.280
<v Speaker 1>you made and which mistakes you don't want our audience

0:05:52.320 --> 0:05:56.000
<v Speaker 1>to avoid. I think often the question is well read

0:05:56.080 --> 0:05:58.440
<v Speaker 1>like what mistakes should I avoid when I start a company?

0:05:58.920 --> 0:06:01.279
<v Speaker 1>I want to ask you the opposite question, what mistakes

0:06:01.279 --> 0:06:04.440
<v Speaker 1>would just so integral that you had to make when

0:06:04.480 --> 0:06:07.360
<v Speaker 1>you started your first company that you would want other

0:06:07.360 --> 0:06:11.400
<v Speaker 1>people to have. It is an absolutely great question, and

0:06:12.000 --> 0:06:14.240
<v Speaker 1>one of the kind of I think one thing you

0:06:14.320 --> 0:06:16.760
<v Speaker 1>learn about business and entrepreneurship as aphorisms, and I think

0:06:16.760 --> 0:06:20.320
<v Speaker 1>one of the aphorisms that's apropos here is I never

0:06:20.400 --> 0:06:22.400
<v Speaker 1>learned so much except for maybe between the ages of

0:06:22.440 --> 0:06:25.360
<v Speaker 1>two and three when I jumped off the cliff for

0:06:25.480 --> 0:06:27.840
<v Speaker 1>my first company, and people obviously, and by the way

0:06:27.839 --> 0:06:32.120
<v Speaker 1>I normally advertise here's the landmine you avoid. You know,

0:06:32.200 --> 0:06:35.320
<v Speaker 1>here's the tour. But your question is also a really

0:06:35.360 --> 0:06:38.680
<v Speaker 1>great one. I would tend to say the mistakes that

0:06:38.760 --> 0:06:41.599
<v Speaker 1>I made that I think are still that are integral

0:06:41.680 --> 0:06:46.159
<v Speaker 1>to being successful in entrepreneurship. One is jumping off the cliff,

0:06:46.320 --> 0:06:48.520
<v Speaker 1>a biased action if you think about it in a

0:06:48.520 --> 0:06:51.160
<v Speaker 1>clearheaded way. There's all kinds of things you don't know

0:06:51.560 --> 0:06:54.200
<v Speaker 1>before you start a company. I didn't really know I

0:06:54.240 --> 0:06:57.360
<v Speaker 1>could never start a company before. Didn't know about financing,

0:06:57.560 --> 0:07:01.080
<v Speaker 1>didn't know about what your initial hires would be, didn't

0:07:01.080 --> 0:07:03.760
<v Speaker 1>know how to scope a project for the first product release,

0:07:04.720 --> 0:07:08.440
<v Speaker 1>didn't know which things were kind of the classic mistakes

0:07:08.440 --> 0:07:09.800
<v Speaker 1>now that I think I could have done a little

0:07:09.800 --> 0:07:12.040
<v Speaker 1>bit more research on and probably would have been, like

0:07:12.120 --> 0:07:14.120
<v Speaker 1>my advice to my younger self would be call a

0:07:14.120 --> 0:07:17.320
<v Speaker 1>few people you know, and kind of avoid the obvious mistakes,

0:07:17.320 --> 0:07:20.560
<v Speaker 1>so you make the unobvious mistakes. But I think the

0:07:20.600 --> 0:07:25.240
<v Speaker 1>predisposition to kind of jumping off the cliff and going

0:07:25.600 --> 0:07:28.360
<v Speaker 1>was I think one of the things that was a

0:07:28.440 --> 0:07:32.200
<v Speaker 1>central you know, you say, it's like embodies a whole

0:07:32.200 --> 0:07:35.160
<v Speaker 1>bunch of mistakes, but you have to make those mistakes,

0:07:35.160 --> 0:07:37.720
<v Speaker 1>and you have to know that you're making them. It's

0:07:37.760 --> 0:07:40.160
<v Speaker 1>almost like, boy, I know, I'm going to get into

0:07:40.200 --> 0:07:42.320
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of fender scrapes and I'm gonna bounce off

0:07:42.360 --> 0:07:44.080
<v Speaker 1>the side of the yde way and that kind of thing.

0:07:44.400 --> 0:07:46.280
<v Speaker 1>But that's the only path forward, So here we go

0:07:46.600 --> 0:07:49.800
<v Speaker 1>and hit the accelerator. Yes, I love that answer. I

0:07:49.800 --> 0:07:52.680
<v Speaker 1>think that's that's such a great one because I think

0:07:52.760 --> 0:07:56.280
<v Speaker 1>you're so right that if you actually think coherently and

0:07:56.480 --> 0:08:00.520
<v Speaker 1>in an organized way, you wouldn't do what ppreneurs have

0:08:00.520 --> 0:08:04.240
<v Speaker 1>had to do, and that becomes your biggest block because

0:08:04.320 --> 0:08:06.360
<v Speaker 1>chances are your first swing is not going to be

0:08:06.360 --> 0:08:11.120
<v Speaker 1>successful anyway. But knowing that and still going away and

0:08:11.160 --> 0:08:13.160
<v Speaker 1>still trying to do that allows you to get over

0:08:13.240 --> 0:08:17.760
<v Speaker 1>that hurdle of being very sensible and thinking more responsibly.

0:08:17.880 --> 0:08:20.520
<v Speaker 1>So I think that's a brilliant answer. I wanted to

0:08:20.560 --> 0:08:24.960
<v Speaker 1>ask you because I think lots of entrepreneurs or people

0:08:24.960 --> 0:08:26.840
<v Speaker 1>who want to be entrepreneurs, and we're going to go

0:08:26.880 --> 0:08:29.560
<v Speaker 1>through the book through chapters that I found really powerful.

0:08:30.000 --> 0:08:31.720
<v Speaker 1>But I wanted to start off by saying you called

0:08:31.760 --> 0:08:35.640
<v Speaker 1>your podcast and the book masters of Scale. And as

0:08:35.679 --> 0:08:37.720
<v Speaker 1>soon as I heard that title, when I first started

0:08:37.720 --> 0:08:40.640
<v Speaker 1>listening to the podcast, I loved it because I always

0:08:40.720 --> 0:08:45.760
<v Speaker 1>wanted to be able to spread wisdom at scale but

0:08:45.920 --> 0:08:49.400
<v Speaker 1>with intimacy and death, and that was always my fascination

0:08:49.520 --> 0:08:52.800
<v Speaker 1>of how could you spread something that was for everyone

0:08:52.880 --> 0:08:56.240
<v Speaker 1>but speak to one person and really feel like you're

0:08:56.240 --> 0:08:59.440
<v Speaker 1>connected to one person. What is the difference between scaling

0:08:59.559 --> 0:09:03.040
<v Speaker 1>and rowing a business and and how you define what

0:09:03.120 --> 0:09:06.640
<v Speaker 1>a master of scale is? I think there's it's a

0:09:06.640 --> 0:09:10.160
<v Speaker 1>little bit like other important words in concepts in our

0:09:10.240 --> 0:09:12.120
<v Speaker 1>human space, like friendship and so forth. It's a little

0:09:12.160 --> 0:09:16.680
<v Speaker 1>deliberately amorphous on kind of where that kind of scale

0:09:16.720 --> 0:09:19.000
<v Speaker 1>and mastery goes, because we want it to be everything

0:09:19.120 --> 0:09:21.720
<v Speaker 1>from you know where the classic things would would think

0:09:21.720 --> 0:09:25.520
<v Speaker 1>about is building businesses like LinkedIn or Airbnb or you know,

0:09:25.679 --> 0:09:28.880
<v Speaker 1>or Uber or Google or any of these things that

0:09:28.920 --> 0:09:33.720
<v Speaker 1>you're that the building these things of industry, redefining society,

0:09:34.679 --> 0:09:39.600
<v Speaker 1>redefining hopefully massively improving kinds of things is kind of

0:09:39.600 --> 0:09:42.640
<v Speaker 1>the scale that you're targeting for. And mastery is the

0:09:42.679 --> 0:09:46.680
<v Speaker 1>mastery of running the the kind of the the slalom

0:09:46.840 --> 0:09:50.640
<v Speaker 1>course with minefield and fog and all the rest, which

0:09:50.760 --> 0:09:53.360
<v Speaker 1>is this is the thing that matters is getting the scale.

0:09:53.360 --> 0:09:55.280
<v Speaker 1>And that's that's what we essentially targeted. It's not just

0:09:55.320 --> 0:09:58.439
<v Speaker 1>the entrepreneurs, but executives and employees and people who care

0:09:58.480 --> 0:10:02.000
<v Speaker 1>about what these companies are organizations are doing. But we

0:10:02.160 --> 0:10:05.959
<v Speaker 1>also hope that the tools will apply in a wide

0:10:06.000 --> 0:10:07.760
<v Speaker 1>variety of other things. So you could say, well, I

0:10:07.800 --> 0:10:11.080
<v Speaker 1>think the only way of solving climate change is scale technology,

0:10:11.640 --> 0:10:15.800
<v Speaker 1>but also the only way of of improving human society

0:10:16.160 --> 0:10:19.480
<v Speaker 1>is scale wisdom. So how would you take these tools

0:10:19.480 --> 0:10:23.400
<v Speaker 1>and make them available across the entire set to think about,

0:10:24.520 --> 0:10:28.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, how do we remake ourselves and our societies,

0:10:28.679 --> 0:10:36.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, at the global or at the transnational scale. Yes, absolutely,

0:10:36.080 --> 0:10:40.680
<v Speaker 1>And I love that differentiation because just like the word entrepreneur.

0:10:40.800 --> 0:10:43.480
<v Speaker 1>I remember I was speaking to a really good friend

0:10:43.480 --> 0:10:47.920
<v Speaker 1>of mine who founded class past pile Kadakia, and I

0:10:47.960 --> 0:10:51.160
<v Speaker 1>believe she's been on your show actually, and yes, and

0:10:51.520 --> 0:10:53.840
<v Speaker 1>I remember speaking to her about that. She was, you know,

0:10:53.960 --> 0:10:56.080
<v Speaker 1>she's also a very big fan of the show too,

0:10:56.440 --> 0:10:59.480
<v Speaker 1>and she was talking about her definition and entrepreneur is

0:10:59.679 --> 0:11:02.600
<v Speaker 1>someone who tries to solve a problem, right, not someone

0:11:02.600 --> 0:11:05.280
<v Speaker 1>who starts a business. And she was saying, you know,

0:11:05.320 --> 0:11:08.040
<v Speaker 1>you could be selling X or Y or z on

0:11:08.520 --> 0:11:10.280
<v Speaker 1>the internet and call it a business and call it

0:11:10.280 --> 0:11:12.640
<v Speaker 1>yourself an entrepreneur. But she was saying that entrepreneurs are

0:11:12.640 --> 0:11:15.360
<v Speaker 1>really trying to solve a problem. They're addicted and obsessed

0:11:15.360 --> 0:11:17.360
<v Speaker 1>with that. And I think, just like that, as you're

0:11:17.360 --> 0:11:21.000
<v Speaker 1>defining the difference between growth and scale, that differentiation is

0:11:21.000 --> 0:11:25.680
<v Speaker 1>important for us as we start to build our journey

0:11:25.800 --> 0:11:29.280
<v Speaker 1>or careers. Now in chapter one, you're talking about getting

0:11:29.480 --> 0:11:32.040
<v Speaker 1>Oh sorry, yes, no, let me just add one thing

0:11:32.080 --> 0:11:35.040
<v Speaker 1>that piles excellent definition. And her episode was great. I

0:11:35.040 --> 0:11:37.439
<v Speaker 1>recommend it to everyone. She was one of the people

0:11:37.440 --> 0:11:40.000
<v Speaker 1>I have the like to meet through doing a podcast.

0:11:40.200 --> 0:11:42.360
<v Speaker 1>Is that one of the awesome things about us doing

0:11:42.360 --> 0:11:44.959
<v Speaker 1>these podcasts is a chance to meet other really interesting people.

0:11:45.040 --> 0:11:47.200
<v Speaker 1>An entrepreneur is a person who's solving a problem, but

0:11:47.320 --> 0:11:50.840
<v Speaker 1>in particular, she or he is solving a problem where

0:11:50.880 --> 0:11:54.760
<v Speaker 1>she doesn't yet have either all the resources or the

0:11:54.840 --> 0:11:58.040
<v Speaker 1>knowledge or all of the tool set in order to

0:11:58.080 --> 0:12:00.120
<v Speaker 1>do it. So you have to actually inject you like

0:12:00.160 --> 0:12:02.080
<v Speaker 1>if you were to say, do I have everything laid

0:12:02.120 --> 0:12:03.640
<v Speaker 1>out in front of me in order to solve that problem?

0:12:03.640 --> 0:12:05.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, for example, I could say for a piece

0:12:05.800 --> 0:12:08.760
<v Speaker 1>of word working like I'm gonna make you a bed frame. Lord,

0:12:08.760 --> 0:12:10.320
<v Speaker 1>Do I have everything out in front of me? The

0:12:10.360 --> 0:12:12.839
<v Speaker 1>answer is, as an entrepreneur, you don't, and you may

0:12:12.880 --> 0:12:15.200
<v Speaker 1>not even yet know how. And that's one of the

0:12:15.320 --> 0:12:19.040
<v Speaker 1>key things about the entrepreneurial Journey. I love that edition

0:12:19.080 --> 0:12:22.320
<v Speaker 1>as well. Yes, building your bedframe from an Ikea box

0:12:22.440 --> 0:12:25.000
<v Speaker 1>is not does not count. It's all laid out for you.

0:12:25.640 --> 0:12:28.840
<v Speaker 1>I absolutely love that chapter one in the book. And

0:12:29.000 --> 0:12:30.640
<v Speaker 1>I always like to give people a little bit of

0:12:30.640 --> 0:12:33.040
<v Speaker 1>a taste when we're talking about a book, because my

0:12:33.240 --> 0:12:36.120
<v Speaker 1>genuine hope for everyone who's listening and watching wherever you are,

0:12:36.480 --> 0:12:38.680
<v Speaker 1>is that you go and grab a copy of this book.

0:12:39.480 --> 0:12:41.880
<v Speaker 1>It's going to be my new book that I recommend

0:12:42.240 --> 0:12:44.000
<v Speaker 1>to each and every single person who comes to me

0:12:44.040 --> 0:12:45.360
<v Speaker 1>and says, you have an idea or I don't know

0:12:45.440 --> 0:12:47.520
<v Speaker 1>what to do with it, I don't know where to start.

0:12:47.720 --> 0:12:49.520
<v Speaker 1>How do I go about it? This is the book

0:12:49.520 --> 0:12:51.560
<v Speaker 1>that I'm going to give them. Or even if you say, yeah,

0:12:51.559 --> 0:12:53.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't have an idea, I just I am a

0:12:53.800 --> 0:12:55.760
<v Speaker 1>bit curious about all of this. All my friends are

0:12:55.760 --> 0:12:58.439
<v Speaker 1>becoming entrepreneurs. I see it all over the world. How

0:12:58.440 --> 0:12:59.760
<v Speaker 1>do I do that? This is the book, I'm going

0:12:59.800 --> 0:13:02.560
<v Speaker 1>to be giving to people, so I love to give

0:13:02.600 --> 0:13:04.800
<v Speaker 1>people a taste. Now, in chapter one you talk about

0:13:04.840 --> 0:13:09.880
<v Speaker 1>getting to know and accepting rejection and hearing nos can

0:13:09.920 --> 0:13:15.439
<v Speaker 1>be really draining and really difficult, especially when we've been

0:13:15.520 --> 0:13:20.640
<v Speaker 1>trained to expect and want a yes. Now, you mentioned

0:13:20.640 --> 0:13:24.880
<v Speaker 1>in the book the contrarian principle, and this is also

0:13:24.920 --> 0:13:26.880
<v Speaker 1>one of the principles you mentioned in your other book,

0:13:26.920 --> 0:13:29.760
<v Speaker 1>blitz Scaling. So I wanted you to actually describe that

0:13:29.800 --> 0:13:32.360
<v Speaker 1>principle to us and talk about how do we get

0:13:32.559 --> 0:13:36.040
<v Speaker 1>used to hearing no, and what is that no really

0:13:36.280 --> 0:13:39.800
<v Speaker 1>asking us to do? So the contrarian principle is in

0:13:39.920 --> 0:13:45.079
<v Speaker 1>order to achieve something bold, different of scale. Frequently, if

0:13:45.080 --> 0:13:47.040
<v Speaker 1>it's an idea that lots and lots of people are had,

0:13:47.080 --> 0:13:49.520
<v Speaker 1>it's much harder to get there, whether as an entrepreneur

0:13:49.640 --> 0:13:52.839
<v Speaker 1>or an investor, And so you generally want to choose

0:13:52.880 --> 0:13:55.600
<v Speaker 1>an idea, choose a path, who's a product or service, whatever,

0:13:55.960 --> 0:13:59.480
<v Speaker 1>which is contrarian but right. It's very easy, of course,

0:13:59.520 --> 0:14:02.640
<v Speaker 1>to be control and wrong because there are many there's

0:14:02.679 --> 0:14:05.439
<v Speaker 1>many foolish things to do in the world. And so

0:14:05.480 --> 0:14:07.480
<v Speaker 1>you go when where a lot of people think that

0:14:07.480 --> 0:14:10.400
<v Speaker 1>that might be wrong, but actually, in fact you have

0:14:10.520 --> 0:14:13.840
<v Speaker 1>had some insight or you and your team and your colleagues,

0:14:13.880 --> 0:14:16.959
<v Speaker 1>your friends have had some insight that you could say, Okay,

0:14:17.000 --> 0:14:18.920
<v Speaker 1>this is how we're going to do it now. Part

0:14:18.920 --> 0:14:22.280
<v Speaker 1>of how that gets to dealing with nose is say,

0:14:22.320 --> 0:14:24.440
<v Speaker 1>for example, and by the way, generally speaking, it's a

0:14:24.480 --> 0:14:27.920
<v Speaker 1>good idea you try to convert crises and opportunities. It's

0:14:27.920 --> 0:14:31.960
<v Speaker 1>a precise kind of mindset strengthening exercises and balance and

0:14:32.040 --> 0:14:34.720
<v Speaker 1>poise that you go across. You know, a set of

0:14:34.800 --> 0:14:38.560
<v Speaker 1>podcasts with on purpose, which is you don't really say well,

0:14:38.600 --> 0:14:40.080
<v Speaker 1>I just want to get a yes. And it's like, well,

0:14:40.240 --> 0:14:41.920
<v Speaker 1>you're not going to just get a yes, especially if

0:14:41.920 --> 0:14:44.120
<v Speaker 1>you have something that's bold and original and different, because

0:14:44.160 --> 0:14:45.480
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of people are gonna say, well, I don't

0:14:45.520 --> 0:14:47.560
<v Speaker 1>get it right, Like, you know, like I don't get

0:14:47.560 --> 0:14:50.160
<v Speaker 1>that people will want to buy flavored water without sugar.

0:14:50.360 --> 0:14:52.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't get that. You know, there's all of these

0:14:52.320 --> 0:14:55.880
<v Speaker 1>things that we go into on master's of scale to say, actually,

0:14:55.880 --> 0:14:57.520
<v Speaker 1>in fact, sometimes when you get a bunch of people

0:14:57.520 --> 0:15:00.320
<v Speaker 1>who say I don't get it, that's precisely you have

0:15:00.400 --> 0:15:04.680
<v Speaker 1>something that's gold. Now so the question is, well, how

0:15:04.680 --> 0:15:06.040
<v Speaker 1>do you deal with a psychology of it? And the

0:15:06.080 --> 0:15:10.520
<v Speaker 1>answer is, well, approach nose not as a rejection of

0:15:10.600 --> 0:15:13.160
<v Speaker 1>you or rejection of your idea. A rejection it is

0:15:13.280 --> 0:15:15.960
<v Speaker 1>obviously a form of rejection, but where you might be

0:15:15.960 --> 0:15:17.960
<v Speaker 1>able to learn something from it, where you might be

0:15:18.000 --> 0:15:20.480
<v Speaker 1>able to understand something about the way the world's working.

0:15:20.840 --> 0:15:23.960
<v Speaker 1>So if actually, in fact, it's a certain kind of

0:15:23.960 --> 0:15:27.280
<v Speaker 1>know where people say, well, everyone knows that you that's

0:15:27.320 --> 0:15:30.680
<v Speaker 1>selling flavored water without sugar because everyone wants sugared water

0:15:31.440 --> 0:15:34.440
<v Speaker 1>won't work, and you're like, ha ha, maybe I have something. Well,

0:15:34.440 --> 0:15:37.440
<v Speaker 1>everybody knows that no stranger is going to rent a

0:15:37.560 --> 0:15:40.800
<v Speaker 1>room or an apartment to another stranger. Ah, I may

0:15:40.840 --> 0:15:44.120
<v Speaker 1>have something. And so you can bring those nose in

0:15:44.200 --> 0:15:47.200
<v Speaker 1>and then part of the categorization that we do within

0:15:47.280 --> 0:15:49.360
<v Speaker 1>that first chapter, because that's part of the reason why

0:15:49.400 --> 0:15:51.560
<v Speaker 1>you open the book with this, is to give you

0:15:51.600 --> 0:15:54.600
<v Speaker 1>a sense of, well, which which way should you responding

0:15:54.640 --> 0:15:58.000
<v Speaker 1>to different kinds of nose, Because sometimes it's a no

0:15:58.200 --> 0:15:59.960
<v Speaker 1>and a thoughtful one from an expert that you should

0:16:00.080 --> 0:16:02.320
<v Speaker 1>dig into some understand some of why they think that.

0:16:02.840 --> 0:16:08.120
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes it's a no, that's it's a like a stereotype

0:16:08.200 --> 0:16:10.080
<v Speaker 1>and just a reflection, and so then you understand that's

0:16:10.080 --> 0:16:12.720
<v Speaker 1>a stereotype. Sometimes it's because the person's not engaging, in

0:16:12.720 --> 0:16:14.640
<v Speaker 1>which case you should work. You should waste no more

0:16:14.680 --> 0:16:18.160
<v Speaker 1>time with this person. And so that's the kind of

0:16:18.440 --> 0:16:20.880
<v Speaker 1>thing of treating it as a learning journey, which of

0:16:20.920 --> 0:16:24.720
<v Speaker 1>course is fundamental to life, and of course the entrepreneurship

0:16:25.280 --> 0:16:30.640
<v Speaker 1>is the way to reorient the mindset in order to

0:16:29.920 --> 0:16:34.280
<v Speaker 1>to to say it's not rejection, it's part of the

0:16:34.320 --> 0:16:37.280
<v Speaker 1>hero's journey you're on. Yes, yeah, I'm glad you referenced

0:16:37.280 --> 0:16:39.920
<v Speaker 1>the hero's journey there as well. And for those of

0:16:39.960 --> 0:16:42.320
<v Speaker 1>you that have not read it, Joseph Campbell and and

0:16:42.440 --> 0:16:47.200
<v Speaker 1>other writers have spoken beautifully about the hero's journey and

0:16:47.800 --> 0:16:51.240
<v Speaker 1>rejection is just such a beautiful part of it when

0:16:51.320 --> 0:16:55.520
<v Speaker 1>you look back, and when you, like you said it's psychological.

0:16:55.800 --> 0:16:59.520
<v Speaker 1>We think it's specific to the idea or the business.

0:16:59.600 --> 0:17:03.440
<v Speaker 1>Actually it's all psychological in hearing no and being rejected

0:17:03.440 --> 0:17:07.200
<v Speaker 1>and still finding a way to continue. And I really

0:17:07.240 --> 0:17:09.960
<v Speaker 1>really resonate with that insight that you just shared around

0:17:10.040 --> 0:17:15.320
<v Speaker 1>how one of our biggest challenges is that we are

0:17:15.440 --> 0:17:19.439
<v Speaker 1>trying to get this unanimous yes and unanimous consent, and

0:17:19.480 --> 0:17:21.720
<v Speaker 1>you say that in the book, you're just like, you're

0:17:21.760 --> 0:17:26.320
<v Speaker 1>actually dubious when there's unanimous consent, because you're thinking to yourself, well,

0:17:26.880 --> 0:17:29.080
<v Speaker 1>there must be this can't be good. Then if everyone

0:17:29.119 --> 0:17:31.280
<v Speaker 1>agrees with it, then this can't be the right idea.

0:17:31.359 --> 0:17:35.120
<v Speaker 1>And I've found that so refreshing because I think we've

0:17:35.119 --> 0:17:37.600
<v Speaker 1>been trained to think the other way that if everyone agrees,

0:17:37.640 --> 0:17:41.120
<v Speaker 1>you're probably onto something, especially people in power. But if

0:17:41.560 --> 0:17:43.800
<v Speaker 1>people in power disagree with you, you're actually saying, well,

0:17:43.840 --> 0:17:46.119
<v Speaker 1>there could be something to learn, but there could be

0:17:46.160 --> 0:17:49.359
<v Speaker 1>an opportunity here as well. One of the things that

0:17:49.400 --> 0:17:51.520
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to ask you about this was is there

0:17:51.640 --> 0:17:55.640
<v Speaker 1>something have you been able to in your life as

0:17:55.680 --> 0:18:00.199
<v Speaker 1>an investor applied that or have you sometimes felt that, no,

0:18:00.320 --> 0:18:02.280
<v Speaker 1>this is definitely not going to work and then something

0:18:02.320 --> 0:18:04.240
<v Speaker 1>became really successful? Right? Has there ever been a time

0:18:04.240 --> 0:18:07.000
<v Speaker 1>when you thought, I've thought about this, there's stuff to

0:18:07.040 --> 0:18:09.720
<v Speaker 1>think about or have you stopped saying no, Have you

0:18:09.760 --> 0:18:14.800
<v Speaker 1>started saying maybe if when? Or do you still say no? Oh?

0:18:14.840 --> 0:18:18.040
<v Speaker 1>I definitely still say no. Because the average you know,

0:18:18.119 --> 0:18:20.199
<v Speaker 1>kind of a general partner of adventure firm looks at

0:18:20.200 --> 0:18:22.280
<v Speaker 1>six hundred to eight hundred deals a year and says

0:18:22.359 --> 0:18:25.560
<v Speaker 1>yes to zero to two of them. And now you're

0:18:25.560 --> 0:18:29.119
<v Speaker 1>generally speaking almost never will you rarely say no in

0:18:29.119 --> 0:18:30.919
<v Speaker 1>a way that's kind of like no, never talk to

0:18:30.960 --> 0:18:34.359
<v Speaker 1>me again. That's if someone's kind of just really not

0:18:34.400 --> 0:18:36.840
<v Speaker 1>the right fit, right, and it's just like, look, don't

0:18:36.840 --> 0:18:38.760
<v Speaker 1>waste your time, to waste my time, this is good.

0:18:38.880 --> 0:18:42.480
<v Speaker 1>Frequently you'll say not right now when you try to

0:18:42.520 --> 0:18:45.119
<v Speaker 1>partner with people and be good for entrepreneurs. The not

0:18:45.280 --> 0:18:47.720
<v Speaker 1>right now may very well be here's some of the

0:18:47.800 --> 0:18:50.359
<v Speaker 1>challenges that I have right now, and I hope and

0:18:50.400 --> 0:18:52.399
<v Speaker 1>anticipate you're going to be really successful, and maybe a

0:18:52.720 --> 0:18:56.080
<v Speaker 1>future path is a time that we will talk about now.

0:18:56.720 --> 0:18:59.720
<v Speaker 1>There's a there's kind of this psychological categorization of false

0:18:59.720 --> 0:19:02.160
<v Speaker 1>spot that as false negatives, otherwise known as type one

0:19:02.160 --> 0:19:05.240
<v Speaker 1>and type two errors. Very rarely when you're doing things

0:19:05.240 --> 0:19:07.760
<v Speaker 1>moving at speed like investing, if you're not making both

0:19:07.760 --> 0:19:10.320
<v Speaker 1>type one and type two errors, both false positives and

0:19:10.400 --> 0:19:13.880
<v Speaker 1>false negatives, you're not doing the game the right way right,

0:19:13.880 --> 0:19:15.960
<v Speaker 1>You're you're being too conservative one way or the other.

0:19:16.000 --> 0:19:18.840
<v Speaker 1>So so if you're too too many positives, then you're

0:19:18.840 --> 0:19:20.760
<v Speaker 1>not making you know you you then you're making a

0:19:20.800 --> 0:19:22.720
<v Speaker 1>set of mistakes and too many negatives. You're making a

0:19:22.720 --> 0:19:26.359
<v Speaker 1>mistake and so um. And so for me, when I

0:19:26.440 --> 0:19:29.920
<v Speaker 1>kind of look at this as is this kind of

0:19:30.400 --> 0:19:33.400
<v Speaker 1>like I think entrepreneurship and investing has this kind of

0:19:34.000 --> 0:19:37.159
<v Speaker 1>yin and yang bringing together that yes and the no,

0:19:37.600 --> 0:19:40.600
<v Speaker 1>that hey, I could see this vision, but I see

0:19:40.600 --> 0:19:42.320
<v Speaker 1>the risks. But I put it together and I make

0:19:42.320 --> 0:19:45.000
<v Speaker 1>a decision, and I think that's part of what we

0:19:45.080 --> 0:19:48.160
<v Speaker 1>find it to be, you know, kind of super interesting.

0:19:48.240 --> 0:19:51.080
<v Speaker 1>And I think that's the that's the way I try

0:19:51.080 --> 0:19:54.439
<v Speaker 1>to balance it, which means that frequently I will say no,

0:19:54.880 --> 0:19:57.240
<v Speaker 1>although my most often no is trying to be helpful,

0:19:57.560 --> 0:19:59.520
<v Speaker 1>like like being the like you could almost look at

0:19:59.520 --> 0:20:02.320
<v Speaker 1>the over the side of the chapter was yes, I

0:20:02.359 --> 0:20:04.000
<v Speaker 1>know that I'm saying no, but I'm trying to be

0:20:04.040 --> 0:20:07.040
<v Speaker 1>as helpful as I possibly can to this person who's

0:20:07.080 --> 0:20:11.400
<v Speaker 1>on this ridiculously hard journey and this is there at

0:20:11.400 --> 0:20:14.479
<v Speaker 1>the moment their life's treasured work in so doing. And

0:20:14.520 --> 0:20:18.480
<v Speaker 1>so anyway, that's a long kind of tendrild answer to

0:20:18.520 --> 0:20:20.399
<v Speaker 1>your question, but I think worth it. No, No, no,

0:20:20.480 --> 0:20:22.960
<v Speaker 1>great auntswer I'm really glad that you got in the

0:20:22.960 --> 0:20:25.760
<v Speaker 1>weeds there. Read I appreciate it. On the flip side,

0:20:25.840 --> 0:20:28.639
<v Speaker 1>read what is what's been one of the most surprising

0:20:28.720 --> 0:20:31.760
<v Speaker 1>yes is that you've given or you've seen in investing

0:20:32.240 --> 0:20:34.159
<v Speaker 1>of a company that we may or may not recognize.

0:20:34.200 --> 0:20:37.800
<v Speaker 1>But what has been the most surprising yes you've ever seen?

0:20:38.000 --> 0:20:42.240
<v Speaker 1>Heard of? Given yourself that Maybe again, if you looked

0:20:42.240 --> 0:20:44.439
<v Speaker 1>at it coherently, you would have been like, hmm, it

0:20:44.520 --> 0:20:47.320
<v Speaker 1>was actually more intuitive. It was more a feeling, it

0:20:47.400 --> 0:20:50.119
<v Speaker 1>was more an experience. It was more just a gut

0:20:50.600 --> 0:20:53.280
<v Speaker 1>Has that ever happened? Do you see that? Well? Definitely,

0:20:53.600 --> 0:20:57.119
<v Speaker 1>because both as entrepreneurs and as investors, when you're at

0:20:57.119 --> 0:21:00.240
<v Speaker 1>the earliest stages the seed the series A, it's a

0:21:00.359 --> 0:21:03.080
<v Speaker 1>vision where you don't know how to get from here

0:21:03.160 --> 0:21:05.560
<v Speaker 1>to there, right you You you've got a theory of

0:21:05.600 --> 0:21:07.880
<v Speaker 1>the game, but you don't actually know how to get there,

0:21:08.320 --> 0:21:12.000
<v Speaker 1>and so and so frequently every yes involves a leap

0:21:12.040 --> 0:21:16.040
<v Speaker 1>of faith, involves a look, I think this entrepreneur, you

0:21:16.080 --> 0:21:19.359
<v Speaker 1>know she or he, this team, this idea, this time,

0:21:19.440 --> 0:21:22.600
<v Speaker 1>this technology, Yeah, I think they could get there. And

0:21:22.640 --> 0:21:25.800
<v Speaker 1>so every yes has a little bit of that characteristic

0:21:26.000 --> 0:21:29.560
<v Speaker 1>At these very early stage kind of judgments. Perhaps the

0:21:29.600 --> 0:21:33.680
<v Speaker 1>funniest one was Airbnb, which my very very first investment

0:21:33.680 --> 0:21:36.480
<v Speaker 1>that I brought to Greylock. And it was at Greylock

0:21:36.520 --> 0:21:39.240
<v Speaker 1>because David z who was my partner at Greylock, was

0:21:39.280 --> 0:21:42.160
<v Speaker 1>my most valuable board member at LinkedIn, you know, kind

0:21:42.200 --> 0:21:44.760
<v Speaker 1>of like converts, convinced me to come join Greylock. And

0:21:44.800 --> 0:21:46.280
<v Speaker 1>I was like, oh, great, and I have a great

0:21:46.359 --> 0:21:49.400
<v Speaker 1>culture of partner with entrepreneurs and and feeling like you're

0:21:49.440 --> 0:21:52.440
<v Speaker 1>the invited partner versus you know, the you know, big

0:21:52.480 --> 0:21:55.480
<v Speaker 1>man on campus as kind of a way of collaborating

0:21:55.480 --> 0:21:58.320
<v Speaker 1>with entrepreneurs. And so I bring an Airbnb and I'm like, oh,

0:21:58.359 --> 0:22:00.440
<v Speaker 1>I think this is really interesting, and and Vid looks

0:22:00.480 --> 0:22:02.880
<v Speaker 1>at me across the partnership table and says, well, every

0:22:03.480 --> 0:22:05.600
<v Speaker 1>venture capitalist has to have a deal that they fail

0:22:05.640 --> 0:22:08.280
<v Speaker 1>on that they learn from, and Airbnb can be yours.

0:22:08.640 --> 0:22:14.480
<v Speaker 1>And so here is this storied, amazing venture investor going oh,

0:22:14.520 --> 0:22:18.200
<v Speaker 1>this is a complete idiotic idea, but go ahead, right

0:22:19.359 --> 0:22:21.320
<v Speaker 1>and so and I thought about it. Now it wasn't

0:22:21.320 --> 0:22:23.159
<v Speaker 1>so much the intuitive part of the question, but I

0:22:23.359 --> 0:22:25.440
<v Speaker 1>thought about it, and I thought really hard, and I went,

0:22:25.920 --> 0:22:28.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, I still think it's worth doing. So he's

0:22:28.359 --> 0:22:30.679
<v Speaker 1>given me permission to do it, so I'm gonna go

0:22:30.720 --> 0:22:33.000
<v Speaker 1>do it right. And by the way, to David's credit

0:22:33.000 --> 0:22:35.720
<v Speaker 1>because he's a learner as well. Six months later, no

0:22:35.840 --> 0:22:37.359
<v Speaker 1>change in the data and else. He came to me

0:22:37.400 --> 0:22:39.480
<v Speaker 1>and said, you were totally right to make this investment.

0:22:39.520 --> 0:22:42.240
<v Speaker 1>What did you see that I didn't see? And I said, well,

0:22:42.280 --> 0:22:46.680
<v Speaker 1>you were right. Cities could react. It's a strange experience.

0:22:47.240 --> 0:22:50.359
<v Speaker 1>You know, hotel lobbies are going to react all of

0:22:50.359 --> 0:22:53.439
<v Speaker 1>the stuff. The question is is if they had a

0:22:53.440 --> 0:22:55.639
<v Speaker 1>good plan on all this stuff, and the world they

0:22:55.640 --> 0:22:58.240
<v Speaker 1>were building toward was the world we should be living in,

0:22:58.600 --> 0:23:01.840
<v Speaker 1>and if they could navigate through those landlines, it would

0:23:01.840 --> 0:23:04.640
<v Speaker 1>be amazing. And so he was like, oh, okay, got

0:23:04.640 --> 0:23:07.320
<v Speaker 1>it right, and then you know, off to a more

0:23:07.440 --> 0:23:11.359
<v Speaker 1>contrarian but seeking to be right investments. Yes, I love that,

0:23:11.400 --> 0:23:12.840
<v Speaker 1>and I love that question that he asked you, like,

0:23:12.920 --> 0:23:14.920
<v Speaker 1>what did you see that I didn't see? I mean

0:23:15.520 --> 0:23:20.000
<v Speaker 1>that that is such a cumulative wisdom opportunity if you're

0:23:20.040 --> 0:23:23.040
<v Speaker 1>if you're always asking that question when you get something

0:23:23.080 --> 0:23:25.440
<v Speaker 1>wrong or make a mistake, or someone gets something right.

0:23:25.480 --> 0:23:28.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean the way that that can accelerate your learning

0:23:28.560 --> 0:23:32.320
<v Speaker 1>and knowledges is absolutely huge, absolutely beautiful. I love that

0:23:32.400 --> 0:23:35.920
<v Speaker 1>Chapter two is called do things that don't scale? Do

0:23:36.000 --> 0:23:39.879
<v Speaker 1>things that don't scale, which, again, you're you're just playing

0:23:39.920 --> 0:23:42.199
<v Speaker 1>with us. Read you're completely playing with us. I'm like

0:23:42.440 --> 0:23:44.960
<v Speaker 1>reading a book called Masters of Scale. You're now telling

0:23:45.040 --> 0:23:47.879
<v Speaker 1>us things do things that don't scale? What do you

0:23:48.000 --> 0:23:51.399
<v Speaker 1>think most startups do wrong in the early stages of

0:23:51.440 --> 0:23:55.680
<v Speaker 1>their business? What are the biggest mistakes? That question we

0:23:55.680 --> 0:23:57.520
<v Speaker 1>were going to be talking for the next three weeks,

0:23:58.720 --> 0:24:00.880
<v Speaker 1>because there are many men any ways to fail. It's

0:24:00.880 --> 0:24:02.480
<v Speaker 1>one of the reasons why I mastered the scale. We

0:24:02.520 --> 0:24:06.119
<v Speaker 1>try to go, here's an interesting pattern to possibly navigating

0:24:06.160 --> 0:24:09.080
<v Speaker 1>the minefield. Here's an interesting pattern, here's a good sensor,

0:24:09.320 --> 0:24:11.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, you know, kind of concepts for doing this.

0:24:11.320 --> 0:24:13.119
<v Speaker 1>Part of the reason why we put this in is

0:24:13.160 --> 0:24:15.960
<v Speaker 1>because the natural thing and everyone goes, okay, I got it,

0:24:16.119 --> 0:24:18.119
<v Speaker 1>scales religion, I'm only going to do things at scale,

0:24:18.560 --> 0:24:21.399
<v Speaker 1>and you actually, in fact say, well, actually, every successful

0:24:21.520 --> 0:24:24.560
<v Speaker 1>entrepreneurial venture, all of these things that have gotten a scale,

0:24:25.240 --> 0:24:27.600
<v Speaker 1>have done a set of things along the path that

0:24:27.640 --> 0:24:31.399
<v Speaker 1>we're essential to succeeding that we're not themselves scale activities,

0:24:32.000 --> 0:24:37.440
<v Speaker 1>and so people might buy into the religion too blindly.

0:24:38.000 --> 0:24:40.160
<v Speaker 1>And you actually said, look, I know that I only

0:24:40.200 --> 0:24:42.400
<v Speaker 1>succeed when I really get to the scale, whether it's

0:24:42.600 --> 0:24:46.639
<v Speaker 1>the business or climate change or wisdom. But if I

0:24:46.680 --> 0:24:49.280
<v Speaker 1>don't do some things that are kind of experimenting with

0:24:49.320 --> 0:24:53.679
<v Speaker 1>product market fit, taking some experiment and innovation, whether it's

0:24:53.720 --> 0:24:56.080
<v Speaker 1>an organization or go to market, you know, the organization

0:24:56.119 --> 0:24:58.280
<v Speaker 1>of how you run or go to market. If I'm

0:24:58.320 --> 0:25:01.280
<v Speaker 1>not doing some of that, I may miss that critical

0:25:01.359 --> 0:25:06.240
<v Speaker 1>path that unlocks the journey to magic at scale, the

0:25:06.680 --> 0:25:10.720
<v Speaker 1>journey to how this really works in transforming the world

0:25:10.720 --> 0:25:13.160
<v Speaker 1>in society we're living in. And so there's a whole

0:25:13.160 --> 0:25:14.879
<v Speaker 1>set of different kinds of techniques where you go, well,

0:25:14.920 --> 0:25:16.960
<v Speaker 1>that one scale, so we're never going to do It's like, well, look,

0:25:16.960 --> 0:25:19.800
<v Speaker 1>if you think it's really important, experiment with it, see

0:25:19.800 --> 0:25:23.360
<v Speaker 1>what's doable, and then you go, wow, it's really important. Okay,

0:25:23.480 --> 0:25:26.240
<v Speaker 1>so what version of this might I be able to scale?

0:25:26.480 --> 0:25:29.399
<v Speaker 1>And that's that's that's essentially the through line through the chapter,

0:25:29.480 --> 0:25:34.560
<v Speaker 1>which of course opens with you know Bryan Chusky Airbnb again, Yes, absolutely, yeah, No,

0:25:34.680 --> 0:25:39.840
<v Speaker 1>I think that that again is a really significant note

0:25:39.880 --> 0:25:42.600
<v Speaker 1>because it's it's so easy to just get lost in

0:25:43.240 --> 0:25:46.640
<v Speaker 1>the numbers, and I really feel that it's it's even

0:25:46.680 --> 0:25:50.520
<v Speaker 1>with the work I do, I found that ultimately, can

0:25:50.600 --> 0:25:56.199
<v Speaker 1>you help one person have an incredible experience? And when

0:25:56.240 --> 0:25:58.200
<v Speaker 1>you can do that for one person, you get trusted

0:25:58.200 --> 0:26:00.960
<v Speaker 1>to do at ten and then hot thousand, and then

0:26:01.000 --> 0:26:03.120
<v Speaker 1>one hundred thousand and a million and a billion, whatever

0:26:03.119 --> 0:26:05.280
<v Speaker 1>it may be. It's the idea of like, I really

0:26:05.280 --> 0:26:09.240
<v Speaker 1>feel like being able to give one person a unique

0:26:09.280 --> 0:26:12.280
<v Speaker 1>experience and under you just learned so much about that,

0:26:13.080 --> 0:26:15.479
<v Speaker 1>and you learned so I know that any any founders

0:26:15.520 --> 0:26:16.959
<v Speaker 1>that I know, they say, you know, they spend all

0:26:16.960 --> 0:26:19.520
<v Speaker 1>their time looking at customer service in the beginning to

0:26:19.560 --> 0:26:22.280
<v Speaker 1>try and figure out, like what part of the journey

0:26:22.280 --> 0:26:26.399
<v Speaker 1>were people not truly feeling was working or was flowing

0:26:26.440 --> 0:26:29.040
<v Speaker 1>for them. There's such an attention to detail there which

0:26:29.080 --> 0:26:31.199
<v Speaker 1>is often ignored when it's like, oh, we've got this

0:26:31.240 --> 0:26:34.720
<v Speaker 1>many stales already, do you know, could you give any examples,

0:26:34.760 --> 0:26:36.520
<v Speaker 1>and again you don't need to name names, Read of

0:26:36.720 --> 0:26:40.919
<v Speaker 1>any companies that actually started off right but maybe didn't

0:26:40.920 --> 0:26:43.480
<v Speaker 1>apply some of this wisdom and you saw them fall

0:26:43.560 --> 0:26:46.320
<v Speaker 1>laugh and again I'm not trying to point fingers or

0:26:46.400 --> 0:26:49.040
<v Speaker 1>name names. I'm trying to understand more that have you

0:26:49.119 --> 0:26:52.040
<v Speaker 1>seen that where it looks like everything's going great, but

0:26:52.080 --> 0:26:55.040
<v Speaker 1>then there's something that is an external but internal that

0:26:55.080 --> 0:26:57.800
<v Speaker 1>breaks down. Well, there's a number and there some degree

0:26:57.840 --> 0:27:00.800
<v Speaker 1>any of the ones that were super once upon a

0:27:00.840 --> 0:27:04.800
<v Speaker 1>time and then went away web van or you know

0:27:04.920 --> 0:27:09.120
<v Speaker 1>kind of all advantage or an early stearch engines excite

0:27:09.600 --> 0:27:11.760
<v Speaker 1>or kind of excited home. There's there's all of these

0:27:11.760 --> 0:27:15.280
<v Speaker 1>things that said, look, something broke along that path to scale.

0:27:15.280 --> 0:27:17.560
<v Speaker 1>There's also ones that and like also failed to get

0:27:17.600 --> 0:27:20.560
<v Speaker 1>to scale. There are those patterns as well, and so

0:27:20.840 --> 0:27:23.800
<v Speaker 1>it's a whole set of things where you know, part

0:27:23.840 --> 0:27:26.480
<v Speaker 1>of the journey of scaling is the problem changes. Like

0:27:26.520 --> 0:27:29.720
<v Speaker 1>we opened with a discussion of entrepreneurships or entrepreneurs or

0:27:29.760 --> 0:27:32.240
<v Speaker 1>problem solvers. Too often one of the things that happens

0:27:32.240 --> 0:27:34.520
<v Speaker 1>to your problem solves, Oh, I solve this version of

0:27:34.560 --> 0:27:36.560
<v Speaker 1>the problem. And so I've got the tool, that's the hammer.

0:27:36.600 --> 0:27:39.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to keep doing it. And the scale journeys involve,

0:27:40.040 --> 0:27:41.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, and that's why we have another chapter Learned

0:27:41.920 --> 0:27:44.879
<v Speaker 1>to un learn is changing the tool set up and

0:27:44.920 --> 0:27:47.040
<v Speaker 1>the path that got you here is not necessarily the

0:27:47.040 --> 0:27:49.359
<v Speaker 1>path that we get you there, and so sometimes you

0:27:49.359 --> 0:27:52.639
<v Speaker 1>have to say, well, that really helped us launch our product,

0:27:53.000 --> 0:27:57.080
<v Speaker 1>but the scale model is actually in fact doing deep

0:27:57.119 --> 0:28:00.280
<v Speaker 1>embedded into SEO and Google, or the scale model is

0:28:00.720 --> 0:28:04.760
<v Speaker 1>moving to telesales and an enterprise model to it to

0:28:04.800 --> 0:28:07.679
<v Speaker 1>bring to my product. And for example, like one of

0:28:07.680 --> 0:28:11.880
<v Speaker 1>the things that was not anticipated at LinkedIn is we

0:28:11.920 --> 0:28:13.879
<v Speaker 1>thought for the first x years it would all be

0:28:13.920 --> 0:28:17.920
<v Speaker 1>individuals only, and we thought individuals would expense their their

0:28:18.040 --> 0:28:21.560
<v Speaker 1>recruiting or their sales or their problem solving to the company.

0:28:21.920 --> 0:28:24.199
<v Speaker 1>But we found that the company started knocking at our

0:28:24.200 --> 0:28:27.280
<v Speaker 1>door almost before we'd launched our subscription product, going well,

0:28:27.320 --> 0:28:30.200
<v Speaker 1>we want an enterprise product, and was like, oh and

0:28:30.480 --> 0:28:32.359
<v Speaker 1>by the way, this is kind of classic entrepreneurship, as

0:28:32.359 --> 0:28:34.200
<v Speaker 1>we went okay, so we listened. We said, well, that's

0:28:34.200 --> 0:28:36.399
<v Speaker 1>different than our plan. How do we measure this, how

0:28:36.440 --> 0:28:39.880
<v Speaker 1>do we have a bias to speed action and learning?

0:28:40.080 --> 0:28:43.080
<v Speaker 1>And we said, okay, well, let's create a PowerPoint deck

0:28:43.560 --> 0:28:46.600
<v Speaker 1>that describes a product. By the way, at this moment

0:28:46.680 --> 0:28:48.960
<v Speaker 1>is totally fictional, like we literally sat around for a

0:28:48.960 --> 0:28:52.040
<v Speaker 1>weekend and said the product could look like this, So

0:28:52.200 --> 0:28:54.520
<v Speaker 1>let's mock it up, create a PowerPoint deck, and then

0:28:54.560 --> 0:28:56.160
<v Speaker 1>go out and say, well, this is a product we're

0:28:56.160 --> 0:28:57.640
<v Speaker 1>working on. What do you think about it? Would you

0:28:57.640 --> 0:29:01.720
<v Speaker 1>buy it? Right? And the first salespeople were very entrepreneurial.

0:29:01.720 --> 0:29:04.400
<v Speaker 1>They're not the same as the scale success salespeople that

0:29:04.480 --> 0:29:06.600
<v Speaker 1>LinkedIn has now, but those where they came back and

0:29:06.600 --> 0:29:08.960
<v Speaker 1>they said, well, we got some weird feedback on this one.

0:29:09.040 --> 0:29:11.600
<v Speaker 1>We've changed that, but this is a product we think

0:29:11.600 --> 0:29:13.680
<v Speaker 1>that a waunch of people will initially buy, and so

0:29:13.800 --> 0:29:16.480
<v Speaker 1>then we went and built it. And that's kind of

0:29:16.560 --> 0:29:20.080
<v Speaker 1>classic for these kind of entrepreneurial journeys. Yeah, I love that.

0:29:20.200 --> 0:29:22.000
<v Speaker 1>I love that. It's always I find that an all

0:29:22.080 --> 0:29:24.800
<v Speaker 1>successful entrepreneur journeys, you see this pivot. You see this

0:29:24.920 --> 0:29:28.520
<v Speaker 1>moment where you're now creating something that wasn't the plan.

0:29:28.600 --> 0:29:31.840
<v Speaker 1>It wasn't the business model, it wasn't the way you

0:29:31.920 --> 0:29:34.440
<v Speaker 1>thought you were going to get to success or scale

0:29:35.040 --> 0:29:39.160
<v Speaker 1>or speed rarely comes from something internally as well, right,

0:29:39.200 --> 0:29:42.080
<v Speaker 1>It comes from how the customers using it, playing with it.

0:29:42.080 --> 0:29:45.800
<v Speaker 1>Who's who's asking the right questions? In chapter three read

0:29:45.840 --> 0:29:49.080
<v Speaker 1>you talk about the big idea? What is the big idea,

0:29:49.200 --> 0:29:52.680
<v Speaker 1>and I feel like and I'm asking this questionably. I mean,

0:29:52.680 --> 0:29:54.400
<v Speaker 1>you probably get this question all the time. I think

0:29:54.400 --> 0:29:57.040
<v Speaker 1>it's important to ask it because I do think this

0:29:57.120 --> 0:30:00.720
<v Speaker 1>is the majority of people that that I connect to,

0:30:00.800 --> 0:30:03.800
<v Speaker 1>that I meet, that I hear when I'm recording the

0:30:03.840 --> 0:30:10.960
<v Speaker 1>podcast is I think I have an idea, but I'm

0:30:11.000 --> 0:30:14.600
<v Speaker 1>too scared to take action on it or take it

0:30:14.760 --> 0:30:19.840
<v Speaker 1>seriously because the whole journey seems overwhelming. Do I have

0:30:19.880 --> 0:30:23.000
<v Speaker 1>to fundraise or not? Do I have the skills or not?

0:30:23.480 --> 0:30:26.640
<v Speaker 1>Are there too many competitors that are doing the same thing?

0:30:26.920 --> 0:30:30.959
<v Speaker 1>Is my idea even original? I saw ten companies like

0:30:31.000 --> 0:30:33.680
<v Speaker 1>this fail last year. These are the things that go

0:30:33.760 --> 0:30:36.440
<v Speaker 1>through our head. And then the most basic one, what

0:30:36.560 --> 0:30:39.240
<v Speaker 1>will my friends say when this doesn't work out right?

0:30:39.600 --> 0:30:42.120
<v Speaker 1>Like what will my parents think of me that I

0:30:42.240 --> 0:30:45.760
<v Speaker 1>left my college education to do this or I quit

0:30:45.880 --> 0:30:48.360
<v Speaker 1>law to do this. These are the kind of things

0:30:48.360 --> 0:30:51.520
<v Speaker 1>we're hearing all the time. What do you say to

0:30:51.560 --> 0:30:53.120
<v Speaker 1>people when they say that to you, or when you

0:30:53.160 --> 0:30:55.680
<v Speaker 1>see that, or when you hear that? And I get

0:30:55.720 --> 0:30:58.400
<v Speaker 1>that that's a big broad question, but how do you

0:30:58.440 --> 0:31:00.760
<v Speaker 1>try and help people narrow it down? It's a very

0:31:00.760 --> 0:31:02.960
<v Speaker 1>complicated question because it comes that lot down to the

0:31:03.040 --> 0:31:10.080
<v Speaker 1>individual and the individual's goals purposes, you know, strategy, risk tolerance,

0:31:10.320 --> 0:31:12.120
<v Speaker 1>what kind of activity they want, and so you have

0:31:12.160 --> 0:31:14.560
<v Speaker 1>to you have to always condition it based on it.

0:31:14.640 --> 0:31:19.000
<v Speaker 1>Now a few general principles which again apply very differently

0:31:19.080 --> 0:31:21.600
<v Speaker 1>depending on you know, kind of kind of who you

0:31:21.640 --> 0:31:25.320
<v Speaker 1>are is, I mean, what circumstances you're in. How much

0:31:25.400 --> 0:31:29.080
<v Speaker 1>risk can you take? Entrepreneurship always involves risk. Even if

0:31:29.080 --> 0:31:31.800
<v Speaker 1>you think you've d risk the idea a lot, there's

0:31:31.840 --> 0:31:33.960
<v Speaker 1>always a lot of unknown unknowns, and part of an

0:31:34.080 --> 0:31:37.200
<v Speaker 1>entrepreneurship you have to deal with the unknowns in order

0:31:37.240 --> 0:31:40.360
<v Speaker 1>to in order to do this, I think there's a

0:31:40.480 --> 0:31:45.400
<v Speaker 1>question around you don't do an entrepreneurial idea unless you

0:31:45.440 --> 0:31:48.360
<v Speaker 1>can think of yourself doing it for the next ten years,

0:31:48.960 --> 0:31:52.360
<v Speaker 1>because part of success is like would this be worth

0:31:52.520 --> 0:31:55.360
<v Speaker 1>at least ten years of my life in so doing?

0:31:55.720 --> 0:31:58.280
<v Speaker 1>And if not, then great? Not the thing that you

0:31:58.320 --> 0:32:00.960
<v Speaker 1>need to do right? And then when you go and

0:32:01.000 --> 0:32:02.520
<v Speaker 1>talk to your friends about it and try to get

0:32:02.520 --> 0:32:05.320
<v Speaker 1>some wisdom of the crowds around how does the thing work?

0:32:06.560 --> 0:32:09.240
<v Speaker 1>You don't ask them do you like the idea? You

0:32:09.280 --> 0:32:11.840
<v Speaker 1>don't ask them do you think it can work, because

0:32:11.840 --> 0:32:15.000
<v Speaker 1>they will think that what you want is reassurance. What

0:32:15.200 --> 0:32:18.480
<v Speaker 1>you want to say what won't work about this idea?

0:32:18.640 --> 0:32:24.320
<v Speaker 1>What could cause the idea to fail? Because if you

0:32:24.400 --> 0:32:26.680
<v Speaker 1>get that feedback and then you begin to aggregate this.

0:32:26.680 --> 0:32:29.240
<v Speaker 1>This also gets back to the learning from nose that

0:32:29.280 --> 0:32:32.320
<v Speaker 1>we were talking about. You aggregate that feedback, then you

0:32:32.400 --> 0:32:37.240
<v Speaker 1>have a better chance at taking smart risks, including choosing

0:32:37.280 --> 0:32:39.320
<v Speaker 1>whether or not to do it. Now. One last little

0:32:39.800 --> 0:32:42.560
<v Speaker 1>kind of kind of pro entrepreneurial tip for people who

0:32:42.560 --> 0:32:47.160
<v Speaker 1>are daunted, which is another thing that good entrepreneurs do

0:32:47.240 --> 0:32:49.560
<v Speaker 1>is they kind of figure out how to experiment. So

0:32:49.600 --> 0:32:51.400
<v Speaker 1>you say, well, I've got this idea. It's an idea

0:32:51.440 --> 0:32:53.040
<v Speaker 1>for a new app. Maybe it's an idea for a

0:32:53.320 --> 0:32:56.360
<v Speaker 1>mindfulness or wisdom app or something. You say, well, all right,

0:32:57.640 --> 0:32:59.880
<v Speaker 1>but I'm really nervous about doing this. What could I do? Well?

0:33:00.120 --> 0:33:04.000
<v Speaker 1>I could go buy some you know kind of I

0:33:04.000 --> 0:33:06.320
<v Speaker 1>could go put up a web page, describe what it is,

0:33:06.640 --> 0:33:08.560
<v Speaker 1>say click on click on here if you're interested in this,

0:33:08.680 --> 0:33:11.200
<v Speaker 1>and then buy some advertising against it, and then see

0:33:11.240 --> 0:33:13.400
<v Speaker 1>what the clickthroughs look. Click and if the click throughs

0:33:13.440 --> 0:33:16.680
<v Speaker 1>look totally fantastic, then I was like, well, maybe shoot,

0:33:16.680 --> 0:33:18.680
<v Speaker 1>that's data. Maybe I should go do this. And because

0:33:18.720 --> 0:33:21.320
<v Speaker 1>I've described alls and if the clickthroughs look bad, then

0:33:21.360 --> 0:33:23.640
<v Speaker 1>you can say, well, maybe I didn't do the experiment

0:33:23.680 --> 0:33:26.440
<v Speaker 1>the right way, or maybe maybe I shouldn't do this

0:33:26.840 --> 0:33:29.840
<v Speaker 1>right And so there's ways to experiment with things. People

0:33:30.040 --> 0:33:34.880
<v Speaker 1>too often get stuck in their mind when when do

0:33:35.600 --> 0:33:39.360
<v Speaker 1>and then reflect? Think, do, reflect, think right and and

0:33:39.520 --> 0:33:42.560
<v Speaker 1>be in that cycle on a relatively quick basis is

0:33:42.600 --> 0:33:46.440
<v Speaker 1>central to solving these unknown, unknown problems. Yeah, I'm so

0:33:46.560 --> 0:33:51.760
<v Speaker 1>glad you added that last piece. I feel like experimenting

0:33:51.880 --> 0:33:56.480
<v Speaker 1>is one of the greatest assets in skill and the

0:33:56.520 --> 0:34:00.560
<v Speaker 1>best thing about experiments they can be free or very cheap.

0:34:00.640 --> 0:34:04.440
<v Speaker 1>They can be very quick to do. You don't have

0:34:04.480 --> 0:34:07.120
<v Speaker 1>to build for a year or you know, waste time

0:34:07.160 --> 0:34:09.080
<v Speaker 1>in your life. You could literally build it this weekend

0:34:09.080 --> 0:34:11.799
<v Speaker 1>if you felt like it and tested something, and you

0:34:11.800 --> 0:34:15.759
<v Speaker 1>get immediate feedback and response from people that are not

0:34:15.840 --> 0:34:18.920
<v Speaker 1>connected to your family or your friends, or people that

0:34:19.280 --> 0:34:21.840
<v Speaker 1>you feel well, they're saying it because they're connected, or

0:34:22.200 --> 0:34:24.200
<v Speaker 1>they don't like it because I'm their friend and they

0:34:24.200 --> 0:34:26.319
<v Speaker 1>know me and they want me to stay safe. And

0:34:26.360 --> 0:34:29.760
<v Speaker 1>so I couldn't agree with you more that I remember

0:34:29.760 --> 0:34:32.920
<v Speaker 1>when I first was starting what I was doing. I

0:34:32.960 --> 0:34:37.520
<v Speaker 1>think experimenting even today has always been my favorite way

0:34:37.520 --> 0:34:40.800
<v Speaker 1>of realizing whether I should do something or not. And

0:34:41.640 --> 0:34:43.799
<v Speaker 1>I love it because anyone who's sitting there going it

0:34:43.880 --> 0:34:47.000
<v Speaker 1>costs too much? Experimenting is free or cheap. Please remember

0:34:47.040 --> 0:34:49.680
<v Speaker 1>that it takes too long. No, it doesn't. This could

0:34:49.680 --> 0:34:54.080
<v Speaker 1>literally happen this weekend, and oh it's you know, well,

0:34:54.440 --> 0:34:56.800
<v Speaker 1>who's going to use it anyway? You have no idea.

0:34:56.920 --> 0:34:59.280
<v Speaker 1>That's the fun of it, And so I'm so happy

0:34:59.320 --> 0:35:03.120
<v Speaker 1>you you've really emphasize that point at the end, because

0:35:03.280 --> 0:35:05.760
<v Speaker 1>there's no better way to see whether your idea actually

0:35:05.800 --> 0:35:09.000
<v Speaker 1>has legs. And oh yes, please read go ahead. Yeah.

0:35:09.080 --> 0:35:11.600
<v Speaker 1>Let me add one thing to this, which is people

0:35:11.640 --> 0:35:14.120
<v Speaker 1>always think experiment is out in the world. Sometimes the

0:35:14.160 --> 0:35:17.280
<v Speaker 1>experiments with yourself too. How does this make you feel?

0:35:17.560 --> 0:35:19.880
<v Speaker 1>Do you feel stressed by it? Do you feel energized

0:35:19.920 --> 0:35:23.480
<v Speaker 1>by it? That experimentation is also good. We have this presumption,

0:35:23.520 --> 0:35:25.959
<v Speaker 1>because we're in our own heads, that we're the best

0:35:26.000 --> 0:35:28.120
<v Speaker 1>experts of ourselves and the answer, of course, we have

0:35:28.160 --> 0:35:30.480
<v Speaker 1>a depth of experience and all the rest. But actually,

0:35:30.480 --> 0:35:33.040
<v Speaker 1>in fact, we have blind spots to ourselves. We have

0:35:33.120 --> 0:35:38.200
<v Speaker 1>unknown unknowns about ourselves, and experimenting is useful there too, Yes,

0:35:38.440 --> 0:35:41.720
<v Speaker 1>for sure, I think that's I mean that deep checking

0:35:41.800 --> 0:35:46.239
<v Speaker 1>with ourselves is potentially when we ignore that it's why

0:35:46.280 --> 0:35:49.560
<v Speaker 1>we're seeking approval and validation from outside because we've not

0:35:49.680 --> 0:35:54.280
<v Speaker 1>really sense checked the idea the experience with ourselves. And

0:35:54.719 --> 0:35:56.799
<v Speaker 1>I've often found the other way around that I've been

0:35:56.880 --> 0:35:59.000
<v Speaker 1>so sure about my decisions and pretty much everyone in

0:35:59.000 --> 0:36:01.560
<v Speaker 1>the room is saying no, but I'm still going to

0:36:01.600 --> 0:36:04.240
<v Speaker 1>do it because I feel so sure. And I've always

0:36:04.239 --> 0:36:08.640
<v Speaker 1>felt that that internal surety and assurance and confidence has

0:36:08.680 --> 0:36:11.799
<v Speaker 1>actually made me feel stronger than even when everyone else agrees.

0:36:12.360 --> 0:36:14.440
<v Speaker 1>And it wasn't for the same reason as you said earlier.

0:36:14.760 --> 0:36:16.840
<v Speaker 1>For me, when I'm in a room when everyone agrees,

0:36:18.080 --> 0:36:21.960
<v Speaker 1>it feels uncomfortable if I am not sure, And I

0:36:22.000 --> 0:36:24.520
<v Speaker 1>think often we're trying to make other people's assurances make

0:36:24.760 --> 0:36:27.479
<v Speaker 1>up for our lack of assurance, but that actually never

0:36:27.520 --> 0:36:29.960
<v Speaker 1>works and it never feels right, whereas it's the other

0:36:30.000 --> 0:36:32.560
<v Speaker 1>way around. Your assurance can make up for everyone's lack

0:36:32.600 --> 0:36:35.560
<v Speaker 1>of assurance and push the idea through. I see you

0:36:35.600 --> 0:36:38.200
<v Speaker 1>nodding and laughing so I feel like, Okay, I'm understanding,

0:36:38.239 --> 0:36:41.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm getting this right. Chapter four read was the one

0:36:41.200 --> 0:36:43.960
<v Speaker 1>that I am most in love with, and it's because

0:36:44.000 --> 0:36:47.719
<v Speaker 1>it's where I am at in my journey in terms

0:36:47.760 --> 0:36:51.600
<v Speaker 1>of culture for my company, culture for my teams. You know,

0:36:51.680 --> 0:36:54.320
<v Speaker 1>where we've been fast growing for the last few years

0:36:55.000 --> 0:36:57.640
<v Speaker 1>across my different ventures and different organizations. We have probably

0:36:57.680 --> 0:37:02.200
<v Speaker 1>around fifty people now, and it's not always people that

0:37:02.280 --> 0:37:05.200
<v Speaker 1>I meet and see all the time. There's people working internationally.

0:37:05.280 --> 0:37:08.480
<v Speaker 1>There's there's people across working across time zones and in

0:37:08.480 --> 0:37:11.280
<v Speaker 1>different areas of our company where I have chief operating

0:37:11.320 --> 0:37:13.640
<v Speaker 1>officers and other individuals who manage them more on a

0:37:13.719 --> 0:37:16.200
<v Speaker 1>day to day basis. And as someone who is also

0:37:17.120 --> 0:37:20.399
<v Speaker 1>quote unquote using industry language, not seeing myself this way

0:37:20.920 --> 0:37:25.319
<v Speaker 1>talent and CEO, it's an interesting position to be in

0:37:25.360 --> 0:37:28.360
<v Speaker 1>and it's something that I realize that I spent a

0:37:28.400 --> 0:37:31.439
<v Speaker 1>lot of years trying to choose and figure out which one,

0:37:31.440 --> 0:37:34.400
<v Speaker 1>and I only just feel this year I've kind of

0:37:34.400 --> 0:37:37.279
<v Speaker 1>figured out how I want to balance the two. And

0:37:37.320 --> 0:37:40.080
<v Speaker 1>so when you're Chapter four is dedicated to what you

0:37:40.160 --> 0:37:43.719
<v Speaker 1>call the neverending, ending project, which is culture, and I

0:37:43.760 --> 0:37:46.359
<v Speaker 1>believe I'm on a culture two point zero for my

0:37:46.480 --> 0:37:49.200
<v Speaker 1>work and what I'm trying to create. And you talk

0:37:49.239 --> 0:37:52.160
<v Speaker 1>a lot about how your first employees in the company

0:37:52.160 --> 0:37:55.360
<v Speaker 1>are important, and you say if your company is dominated

0:37:55.400 --> 0:37:59.759
<v Speaker 1>by one type of person, your collective blind spots will

0:37:59.800 --> 0:38:03.960
<v Speaker 1>add up to tunnel vision, and which I thought was fascinating.

0:38:04.000 --> 0:38:07.480
<v Speaker 1>But the part of culture that I find most interesting

0:38:08.680 --> 0:38:15.600
<v Speaker 1>is being able to sustain, continually inspire and create a

0:38:15.640 --> 0:38:21.319
<v Speaker 1>culture that people also want to be a part of. Now, recruitment, retention,

0:38:21.400 --> 0:38:25.360
<v Speaker 1>and reward are all part of that puzzle. Let's go

0:38:25.440 --> 0:38:28.879
<v Speaker 1>through each of them. Let's start with recruitment. What has

0:38:28.960 --> 0:38:33.480
<v Speaker 1>been your favorite way of knowing you've made a good hire?

0:38:34.360 --> 0:38:38.240
<v Speaker 1>What has been your favorite method, approach tactic to hiring

0:38:38.280 --> 0:38:40.680
<v Speaker 1>that has deeply helped all one that you've seen through

0:38:40.719 --> 0:38:43.480
<v Speaker 1>the podcast that you've been blown away by. So I

0:38:43.520 --> 0:38:46.800
<v Speaker 1>think one of the really key things to do well

0:38:47.120 --> 0:38:51.759
<v Speaker 1>is to not make hiring a solo journey for you

0:38:51.960 --> 0:38:55.280
<v Speaker 1>as founder or CEO, or for any manager or executive,

0:38:56.040 --> 0:39:00.680
<v Speaker 1>but rather make both the hiring decisioning at least moderately

0:39:00.719 --> 0:39:02.560
<v Speaker 1>a group journey, not just because of buying a group

0:39:02.600 --> 0:39:04.440
<v Speaker 1>and all arrests, but even if you're like, look, I'm

0:39:04.520 --> 0:39:08.799
<v Speaker 1>hiring a new you know, VP of people. It's it's

0:39:08.800 --> 0:39:11.920
<v Speaker 1>the beginning of an organization. But you're like, and that

0:39:12.000 --> 0:39:13.920
<v Speaker 1>will report to the CEO. But I wouldn't. Don't just

0:39:13.960 --> 0:39:16.319
<v Speaker 1>do it as only the CEO. So that's one part

0:39:16.320 --> 0:39:19.240
<v Speaker 1>in the hiring. But then the next part gets really critical,

0:39:19.840 --> 0:39:24.879
<v Speaker 1>which is make other people, like, make a group responsible

0:39:24.920 --> 0:39:29.360
<v Speaker 1>for the onboarding, so that part of how a person

0:39:29.440 --> 0:39:32.480
<v Speaker 1>comes up to speed quickly on the culture begins to

0:39:32.520 --> 0:39:34.279
<v Speaker 1>add to it is not just the discussions that you

0:39:34.360 --> 0:39:37.520
<v Speaker 1>have during the interviewing and reference checking and other kinds

0:39:37.520 --> 0:39:40.520
<v Speaker 1>of things of the process, but also during the initial

0:39:40.560 --> 0:39:42.839
<v Speaker 1>parts of the work. Because if you have that, then

0:39:42.920 --> 0:39:45.840
<v Speaker 1>you have the whole or you know, a proxy of

0:39:45.880 --> 0:39:50.200
<v Speaker 1>the organization reaching out and helping without onboarding. And then

0:39:50.280 --> 0:39:53.759
<v Speaker 1>that gets the detail of your question, because how do

0:39:53.800 --> 0:39:56.439
<v Speaker 1>you know that you've made a magnificent hire is when

0:39:56.960 --> 0:39:59.560
<v Speaker 1>call it the three people or five people that you've

0:39:59.560 --> 0:40:05.280
<v Speaker 1>made jointly responsible for the onboarding. I'll come back and say, Oh,

0:40:04.680 --> 0:40:08.480
<v Speaker 1>this new person she's great. Oh this new person, you know,

0:40:08.640 --> 0:40:11.200
<v Speaker 1>he's really interesting and he's you know, doing well. And

0:40:11.280 --> 0:40:14.160
<v Speaker 1>so because then you can say, ah, I've got a

0:40:14.239 --> 0:40:16.480
<v Speaker 1>lot of different touch points. And by the way, of course,

0:40:16.480 --> 0:40:17.920
<v Speaker 1>one of the things is if you get three of

0:40:17.920 --> 0:40:19.319
<v Speaker 1>them or two of them saying hey, great and the

0:40:19.360 --> 0:40:21.239
<v Speaker 1>other two going I don't know, you go, okay, well,

0:40:21.400 --> 0:40:22.640
<v Speaker 1>what's the I don't know? Do I need to make

0:40:22.640 --> 0:40:25.480
<v Speaker 1>an adjustment? That's not necessarily an adjustment the person should

0:40:25.520 --> 0:40:27.919
<v Speaker 1>meet over the organization. But you want to do all

0:40:27.920 --> 0:40:31.839
<v Speaker 1>the stuff early, right, because you usually when you have

0:40:31.880 --> 0:40:37.400
<v Speaker 1>this magnificent partnering between new employees and the organization they're working,

0:40:37.760 --> 0:40:41.360
<v Speaker 1>it starts on a very strong foot. It's rare that

0:40:41.400 --> 0:40:44.000
<v Speaker 1>it starts on a weak foot and then converts. So

0:40:44.040 --> 0:40:47.320
<v Speaker 1>you want as much of that initial strength as possible,

0:40:47.360 --> 0:40:50.919
<v Speaker 1>and you need the organization to kind of collectively work

0:40:50.960 --> 0:40:53.040
<v Speaker 1>at it, and then, by the way, ultimately make a decision,

0:40:53.040 --> 0:40:55.880
<v Speaker 1>because like if you go, if you're sixty days in

0:40:55.920 --> 0:40:57.839
<v Speaker 1>and you're like, this is a mistake, then you want

0:40:57.840 --> 0:41:01.040
<v Speaker 1>to fix the mistakes as quickly but also as humanly

0:41:01.040 --> 0:41:05.040
<v Speaker 1>as possible. Yes, yeah, I really appreciate that advice. I

0:41:05.040 --> 0:41:08.560
<v Speaker 1>think that's the mistake I made first time around. The

0:41:08.719 --> 0:41:13.520
<v Speaker 1>whole recruitment approach was one person led. It was very,

0:41:13.640 --> 0:41:16.839
<v Speaker 1>very difficult to figure it out. And you're so right

0:41:16.880 --> 0:41:20.000
<v Speaker 1>that as soon as we switch to a more group

0:41:20.040 --> 0:41:22.960
<v Speaker 1>based system, that in effect And it's hard in the

0:41:23.000 --> 0:41:26.560
<v Speaker 1>beginning because sometimes there isn't that bigger group in the beginning,

0:41:26.560 --> 0:41:29.200
<v Speaker 1>it is just you, and so you're kind of relying

0:41:29.239 --> 0:41:32.640
<v Speaker 1>on yourself. But I like the idea of including people

0:41:32.680 --> 0:41:35.480
<v Speaker 1>even if they're not full time, even if they're people

0:41:35.520 --> 0:41:37.680
<v Speaker 1>that work with you freelance or part time, that you

0:41:37.760 --> 0:41:40.600
<v Speaker 1>trust and love. You may even have someone involved that

0:41:40.640 --> 0:41:43.200
<v Speaker 1>you value in your personal life as part of the

0:41:43.239 --> 0:41:46.359
<v Speaker 1>interview process. I think that we think of that as

0:41:46.400 --> 0:41:49.000
<v Speaker 1>weird or awkward, but it's not at all, because there

0:41:49.040 --> 0:41:50.759
<v Speaker 1>may be someone in your personal life who you believe

0:41:50.840 --> 0:41:53.840
<v Speaker 1>really understands you and knows you that could help with

0:41:53.880 --> 0:41:57.320
<v Speaker 1>that process. So I think that's a such a great

0:41:57.360 --> 0:41:59.399
<v Speaker 1>way of thinking about it, in such a simple way

0:41:59.400 --> 0:42:03.840
<v Speaker 1>of solving the problem. Let's move on to retention. Keeping

0:42:03.840 --> 0:42:07.640
<v Speaker 1>that culture, growing that culture, preserving it, expanding it. What

0:42:07.760 --> 0:42:11.240
<v Speaker 1>are certain cultural principles? Every company has their own culture,

0:42:11.320 --> 0:42:13.400
<v Speaker 1>and everyone has their own deck, and everyone puts their

0:42:13.440 --> 0:42:16.359
<v Speaker 1>own words on the wall. What is some that you

0:42:16.480 --> 0:42:20.319
<v Speaker 1>think are underlying all good company culture? Are there some

0:42:20.400 --> 0:42:23.520
<v Speaker 1>key pillars, key themes that you believe are just integral

0:42:24.040 --> 0:42:28.080
<v Speaker 1>to any successful company that kind of go beyond industry

0:42:28.200 --> 0:42:31.799
<v Speaker 1>boundaries and backgrounds. Well, I think there's patterns that you

0:42:31.840 --> 0:42:34.520
<v Speaker 1>want in every culture. It doesn't assume mean they're instantiate

0:42:34.680 --> 0:42:37.320
<v Speaker 1>the same way. So it's it's kind of the question

0:42:37.360 --> 0:42:40.520
<v Speaker 1>of like what does excellence look like? Here? We always

0:42:40.520 --> 0:42:43.680
<v Speaker 1>search search excellence, but what is excellence for us? Like

0:42:43.760 --> 0:42:46.920
<v Speaker 1>it should a culture should always be seeking excellence, but

0:42:47.120 --> 0:42:50.799
<v Speaker 1>specific not we you seek excellence, but like our excellence

0:42:50.960 --> 0:42:55.320
<v Speaker 1>is this sort like we are thoughtful, we are multi

0:42:55.360 --> 0:42:59.040
<v Speaker 1>stakehost older inclusive. It's like what are the top priorities

0:42:59.360 --> 0:43:02.560
<v Speaker 1>in terms of what you're doing? Another one is this

0:43:02.640 --> 0:43:05.719
<v Speaker 1>is how we define our team play. This is the

0:43:05.840 --> 0:43:08.919
<v Speaker 1>kind of way that we hold each other accountable. Part

0:43:08.920 --> 0:43:12.240
<v Speaker 1>of defining a culture is like, for example, where should

0:43:12.280 --> 0:43:14.759
<v Speaker 1>every employee be able to hold the founder or the

0:43:14.800 --> 0:43:17.840
<v Speaker 1>CEO accountable? What? What what should they hold that person

0:43:17.880 --> 0:43:21.040
<v Speaker 1>accountable for? Like what's the way that we are running

0:43:21.120 --> 0:43:23.560
<v Speaker 1>in that? And I think that's part of like what

0:43:23.680 --> 0:43:26.920
<v Speaker 1>the pattern of that is? So like are we move

0:43:27.040 --> 0:43:31.160
<v Speaker 1>fast or we are take intelligent risks or we are

0:43:31.719 --> 0:43:34.319
<v Speaker 1>act like owners? You know, all of these things could

0:43:34.360 --> 0:43:38.759
<v Speaker 1>be very good cultural elements, but which one particularly define us?

0:43:39.120 --> 0:43:41.360
<v Speaker 1>And even though there might be a list of twenty virtues,

0:43:41.880 --> 0:43:43.680
<v Speaker 1>part of culture is like, well, these are the ones

0:43:43.719 --> 0:43:45.560
<v Speaker 1>we most focus on. These are the ones we most

0:43:45.560 --> 0:43:48.040
<v Speaker 1>hold each other accountable to. These are the ones that

0:43:48.080 --> 0:43:52.480
<v Speaker 1>were like when we're cross checking, how we're evolving, how

0:43:52.480 --> 0:43:55.560
<v Speaker 1>we're playing the game, how we're getting the scale that

0:43:55.719 --> 0:43:58.919
<v Speaker 1>cross checking is still the thing that with each other,

0:43:59.320 --> 0:44:01.280
<v Speaker 1>that drives us for it, and you want to set

0:44:01.360 --> 0:44:04.680
<v Speaker 1>that from the very earliest days. It grows, it can change.

0:44:04.920 --> 0:44:07.320
<v Speaker 1>The mistake that people frequently have a thing about culture

0:44:07.400 --> 0:44:09.520
<v Speaker 1>is they think like a culture deck. They think it's like,

0:44:09.840 --> 0:44:12.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, the Ten Commandments. You know, it's like it

0:44:12.440 --> 0:44:15.400
<v Speaker 1>comes written in stone, and you're like, no, no, culture evolves.

0:44:15.760 --> 0:44:17.920
<v Speaker 1>And so you want to have the right organism, the

0:44:18.000 --> 0:44:20.880
<v Speaker 1>right set of people who are adding to it, who

0:44:20.920 --> 0:44:23.120
<v Speaker 1>when you when you when you bring in a new person,

0:44:23.480 --> 0:44:26.279
<v Speaker 1>they're part of that organism too, also adding to it

0:44:26.520 --> 0:44:28.920
<v Speaker 1>and also helping it, you know, adapt and change and

0:44:29.000 --> 0:44:34.120
<v Speaker 1>expand with a foundation but still organic and developing. Yes. Yes,

0:44:34.239 --> 0:44:36.960
<v Speaker 1>one of one of the ones that I think work

0:44:37.080 --> 0:44:40.400
<v Speaker 1>like that for me was as an entrepreneur, one of

0:44:40.400 --> 0:44:46.800
<v Speaker 1>your values naturally is risk taking. It's expression, it's it's failing,

0:44:46.880 --> 0:44:49.360
<v Speaker 1>it's figuring it out. And I realized that actually, for

0:44:49.480 --> 0:44:52.960
<v Speaker 1>my team, one of their biggest values was the exact opposite,

0:44:53.000 --> 0:44:56.120
<v Speaker 1>and it was safety. And I started to realize how

0:44:56.600 --> 0:45:00.719
<v Speaker 1>important safety was to team members. And that blows my

0:45:00.760 --> 0:45:02.800
<v Speaker 1>mind because I was just I've never looked for safety

0:45:02.840 --> 0:45:06.439
<v Speaker 1>in my life anywhere, And it's so easy to get

0:45:06.440 --> 0:45:09.880
<v Speaker 1>caught up in building a culture that is only for you,

0:45:10.080 --> 0:45:12.440
<v Speaker 1>but not everyone can work that way. And I started

0:45:12.440 --> 0:45:15.400
<v Speaker 1>to recognize how certain things we did, even though we

0:45:15.440 --> 0:45:18.560
<v Speaker 1>didn't do it to have this impact, it would be

0:45:18.600 --> 0:45:22.880
<v Speaker 1>seen as unsafe to someone even though it was never

0:45:22.920 --> 0:45:25.480
<v Speaker 1>from that mindset. The mindset was always growth and building

0:45:25.520 --> 0:45:29.320
<v Speaker 1>and doing more amazing things. But how not bringing people

0:45:29.320 --> 0:45:32.000
<v Speaker 1>on that journey made them feel unsafe. And so that one,

0:45:32.080 --> 0:45:33.680
<v Speaker 1>for me was a huge one that I had to

0:45:33.719 --> 0:45:38.080
<v Speaker 1>realize that this idea of being proactive and risk driven

0:45:38.120 --> 0:45:41.359
<v Speaker 1>and all this actually had to be completely reverse engineered

0:45:42.120 --> 0:45:46.120
<v Speaker 1>into a feeling of just safety and support, which was

0:45:46.160 --> 0:45:48.120
<v Speaker 1>new to me and byther the nuance of course, which

0:45:48.160 --> 0:45:50.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm certain most part of your journey is, which parts

0:45:50.960 --> 0:45:53.719
<v Speaker 1>of safety, which were the fundamental it's not safety and

0:45:53.840 --> 0:45:57.840
<v Speaker 1>everything safety and everywhere, it's which were the key parts

0:45:57.920 --> 0:46:01.440
<v Speaker 1>that are part of this organization, this set of team play,

0:46:01.760 --> 0:46:05.799
<v Speaker 1>and that's part of organic cultural evolution. Yes, yes, no,

0:46:05.960 --> 0:46:08.719
<v Speaker 1>And that's why. Yeah, I think that that nuance is

0:46:09.520 --> 0:46:11.799
<v Speaker 1>is so clear that we live at a time where

0:46:11.800 --> 0:46:14.040
<v Speaker 1>everyone's just like, WHOA should I make a company that's

0:46:14.120 --> 0:46:17.040
<v Speaker 1>risky or that's this, And it's so much more about

0:46:17.040 --> 0:46:20.799
<v Speaker 1>embracing polarities than it is about choosing one or the

0:46:20.840 --> 0:46:24.719
<v Speaker 1>other blanketly, because that doesn't that doesn't work either. So no,

0:46:24.840 --> 0:46:28.719
<v Speaker 1>I love that distinction and so important. Chapter seven that

0:46:28.760 --> 0:46:30.720
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to dive in and I'm mixing and skipping

0:46:30.760 --> 0:46:33.960
<v Speaker 1>now is you know, watch what they do, not what

0:46:34.040 --> 0:46:37.440
<v Speaker 1>they say. And in terms of looking at the customer,

0:46:37.440 --> 0:46:40.239
<v Speaker 1>and I find that this is something that some people

0:46:40.320 --> 0:46:43.080
<v Speaker 1>have an innate ability to spot patterns and notice how

0:46:43.120 --> 0:46:46.360
<v Speaker 1>people are interacting. And you know, sometimes I feel like

0:46:46.440 --> 0:46:48.680
<v Speaker 1>my mind works like an algorithm, and I feel like

0:46:49.120 --> 0:46:52.279
<v Speaker 1>my mind's like just connecting darts and stuff. But at

0:46:52.360 --> 0:46:54.560
<v Speaker 1>the same time, what are some of the most practical

0:46:54.680 --> 0:46:59.880
<v Speaker 1>ways you've seen companies really listen, learn and watch their

0:47:00.200 --> 0:47:03.799
<v Speaker 1>customers or people before they become customers. What have been

0:47:03.880 --> 0:47:06.920
<v Speaker 1>some of the most masterful ways that companies have actually

0:47:07.320 --> 0:47:10.319
<v Speaker 1>made systematize that. Well, there's a whole set and it

0:47:10.360 --> 0:47:15.160
<v Speaker 1>goes from obviously consumer internet, which tends to be the

0:47:15.200 --> 0:47:19.080
<v Speaker 1>software telemetry in terms of what's going on, to even

0:47:19.239 --> 0:47:22.200
<v Speaker 1>physical hardware like for example, watching on like one of

0:47:22.200 --> 0:47:25.040
<v Speaker 1>the things the earliest things that's taught in design school

0:47:25.080 --> 0:47:28.759
<v Speaker 1>from decades ago is watched the unboxing experience. Because while

0:47:28.800 --> 0:47:31.279
<v Speaker 1>people you might say what most what did you most love?

0:47:31.320 --> 0:47:34.759
<v Speaker 1>What did you most hate, the person may not realize

0:47:34.880 --> 0:47:37.200
<v Speaker 1>that the thing that caused them to start on the

0:47:37.200 --> 0:47:40.480
<v Speaker 1>wrong foot was like, for example, a weird unboxing experience.

0:47:41.040 --> 0:47:43.560
<v Speaker 1>And so the general truth the matter is is you

0:47:43.640 --> 0:47:47.680
<v Speaker 1>always want to spend a little bit of time kind

0:47:47.719 --> 0:47:53.319
<v Speaker 1>of observing a kind of an unguided and unforced interaction

0:47:54.080 --> 0:47:56.200
<v Speaker 1>with the product or service that you're trying to do.

0:47:56.360 --> 0:47:58.440
<v Speaker 1>And sometimes you need a lot of time, sometimes you

0:47:58.480 --> 0:48:00.440
<v Speaker 1>need a lot of people doing that, but you want

0:48:00.440 --> 0:48:03.640
<v Speaker 1>to get some sense of it because if you don't

0:48:03.680 --> 0:48:07.080
<v Speaker 1>have that sense, and some people of course just totally

0:48:07.160 --> 0:48:10.080
<v Speaker 1>natural at that intuition. This is among the you know,

0:48:10.120 --> 0:48:13.360
<v Speaker 1>the brilliances of the Steve Jobs and so forth. But

0:48:13.400 --> 0:48:16.799
<v Speaker 1>if you don't get that sense, then you could make

0:48:16.840 --> 0:48:21.240
<v Speaker 1>some very fundamental bad assumptions, bad judgments. And too often,

0:48:22.160 --> 0:48:25.239
<v Speaker 1>very very few of us should totally prioritize. You know,

0:48:25.360 --> 0:48:28.560
<v Speaker 1>I am genius, I know the product. It's always like,

0:48:28.760 --> 0:48:31.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, be learning, be learning from other people, be

0:48:31.400 --> 0:48:33.719
<v Speaker 1>learning from watching. And you know, for example, one of

0:48:33.760 --> 0:48:37.480
<v Speaker 1>the things that I think people are underappreciate in the

0:48:37.600 --> 0:48:40.520
<v Speaker 1>kind of the Steve Jobs canon is how much that

0:48:40.640 --> 0:48:43.000
<v Speaker 1>every time he kind of found an interesting new product,

0:48:43.120 --> 0:48:45.960
<v Speaker 1>even one that he thought was completely bonkers, he would

0:48:46.120 --> 0:48:49.640
<v Speaker 1>invite the founder by for lunch or for breakfast or

0:48:49.640 --> 0:48:52.600
<v Speaker 1>for coffee and talk to them because a way of

0:48:52.680 --> 0:48:54.919
<v Speaker 1>learning as a way of doing that, and I think

0:48:54.960 --> 0:48:59.480
<v Speaker 1>that is a similar kind of tactile nature of that,

0:48:59.719 --> 0:49:02.000
<v Speaker 1>And so I think that's the that's the thing is

0:49:02.040 --> 0:49:07.440
<v Speaker 1>to is to try to get some observation and some engagement.

0:49:07.480 --> 0:49:10.640
<v Speaker 1>There is I think critical for every entrepreneur. Wow, And

0:49:10.920 --> 0:49:13.160
<v Speaker 1>that's the side of Steve Jobs that's often not talked

0:49:13.160 --> 0:49:16.719
<v Speaker 1>about or not often shared, and and you know, it's

0:49:16.760 --> 0:49:20.200
<v Speaker 1>it's really fascinating for me. Steve Jobs has been such

0:49:20.239 --> 0:49:24.000
<v Speaker 1>a inspiration in so many ways by you know, studying

0:49:24.000 --> 0:49:28.160
<v Speaker 1>his life and studying decisions choices, his spiritual background. You know,

0:49:28.520 --> 0:49:32.040
<v Speaker 1>there is such a fascinating individual. And I think again,

0:49:32.120 --> 0:49:35.840
<v Speaker 1>when we look at entrepreneurs and where we study entrepreneurs,

0:49:35.840 --> 0:49:38.360
<v Speaker 1>it's so important to not start putting them in boxes

0:49:39.040 --> 0:49:41.600
<v Speaker 1>and then trying to choose which personality type we are,

0:49:41.680 --> 0:49:45.719
<v Speaker 1>because people are so much more complex and multilayered and textured.

0:49:46.000 --> 0:49:49.479
<v Speaker 1>Like each interesting entrepreneurial journey is somewhat sui generous. So

0:49:49.600 --> 0:49:52.279
<v Speaker 1>while there are archetypes that you should pay attention to,

0:49:52.680 --> 0:49:55.640
<v Speaker 1>whether it's union or anything else, the notion of what

0:49:55.680 --> 0:49:58.960
<v Speaker 1>you're doing is you're creating something new. And by the

0:49:59.000 --> 0:50:01.760
<v Speaker 1>way that you don't want to invent everything across all spectrum.

0:50:01.760 --> 0:50:04.120
<v Speaker 1>You want to focus set of new things, usually the

0:50:04.120 --> 0:50:06.720
<v Speaker 1>product or service, sometimes in the way you go to market,

0:50:06.800 --> 0:50:10.000
<v Speaker 1>sometimes in the way you organize. But one mistake that's

0:50:10.040 --> 0:50:12.399
<v Speaker 1>kind of entertaining the entrepreneur's make is they invent new

0:50:12.440 --> 0:50:15.320
<v Speaker 1>on everything. And actually, in fact it is too generous.

0:50:15.400 --> 0:50:20.360
<v Speaker 1>It is unique and a specific subset of inventions or

0:50:20.360 --> 0:50:23.200
<v Speaker 1>what's key. I love that that's that's that's such an

0:50:23.840 --> 0:50:26.080
<v Speaker 1>interesting and new way of thinking. About it as well,

0:50:26.120 --> 0:50:29.320
<v Speaker 1>that I don't think that you know, we've all fully

0:50:29.360 --> 0:50:32.000
<v Speaker 1>considered read it. We've got a few more moments left

0:50:32.000 --> 0:50:34.160
<v Speaker 1>with you. I've got a ton more questions for you,

0:50:34.200 --> 0:50:37.000
<v Speaker 1>but I'm gonna I'm gonna be I'm gonna narrow some

0:50:37.040 --> 0:50:39.080
<v Speaker 1>of them down. I wanted to ask you before we

0:50:39.120 --> 0:50:41.400
<v Speaker 1>dive into what we called the final five on on Purpose,

0:50:41.400 --> 0:50:44.560
<v Speaker 1>which is our fast five. I wanted to ask you.

0:50:45.239 --> 0:50:47.520
<v Speaker 1>We were speaking earlier before we came live, and we

0:50:47.520 --> 0:50:49.680
<v Speaker 1>were talking about purpose, and you were talking about how

0:50:49.760 --> 0:50:53.839
<v Speaker 1>Masters of Scale is like philanthropic, it's service based, it's extension, right,

0:50:54.680 --> 0:50:58.920
<v Speaker 1>tell how important? At what point is purpose important? Is

0:50:58.960 --> 0:51:01.720
<v Speaker 1>it important? From the big inning it does? It usually

0:51:01.719 --> 0:51:04.759
<v Speaker 1>evolve later for entrepreneurs. Where does it fit into the

0:51:04.800 --> 0:51:08.839
<v Speaker 1>puzzle of joy, happiness, success? And where have you seen

0:51:08.920 --> 0:51:14.400
<v Speaker 1>it been most beautifully incorporated. Frequently entrepreneurs can make a

0:51:14.440 --> 0:51:18.839
<v Speaker 1>mistake here because there they go, Look, there's this market opportunity.

0:51:18.960 --> 0:51:23.560
<v Speaker 1>This technology enables this. I see this competitive space opening up.

0:51:24.040 --> 0:51:25.960
<v Speaker 1>I see that I could now do this with this

0:51:26.000 --> 0:51:28.640
<v Speaker 1>new technology. I could offer this product that's now based

0:51:28.680 --> 0:51:31.920
<v Speaker 1>on the cloud, or based on AI or based on mobile,

0:51:32.440 --> 0:51:34.439
<v Speaker 1>and that's all very by the way, very important. It's

0:51:34.800 --> 0:51:38.759
<v Speaker 1>super relevant to the success of the entrepreneurial journey. But

0:51:39.160 --> 0:51:42.720
<v Speaker 1>these entrepreneurial journeys, they're team sports, they're not individual sports.

0:51:43.480 --> 0:51:45.600
<v Speaker 1>And as part of the team sport, and part of

0:51:45.600 --> 0:51:48.480
<v Speaker 1>the reason why, like whenever you look at any team organization,

0:51:48.640 --> 0:51:51.960
<v Speaker 1>sports teams, your military teams and other things, is that

0:51:52.080 --> 0:51:55.680
<v Speaker 1>a spree decor that we're in this together and that

0:51:55.719 --> 0:51:57.759
<v Speaker 1>it matters that we're in this and that we have

0:51:57.880 --> 0:52:00.720
<v Speaker 1>pride that we're in this. Pride with each other, Pride

0:52:00.719 --> 0:52:04.759
<v Speaker 1>with our family, is pride with the society, and that

0:52:04.920 --> 0:52:07.160
<v Speaker 1>is all part of having a purpose, part of having

0:52:07.160 --> 0:52:10.880
<v Speaker 1>a mission, and so defining that like why what is

0:52:10.920 --> 0:52:13.799
<v Speaker 1>the world that we are seeking to make it better?

0:52:13.800 --> 0:52:15.880
<v Speaker 1>And by the way, it doesn't have look obviously the

0:52:15.880 --> 0:52:18.560
<v Speaker 1>people trying to cure cancer, it's super important, but there's

0:52:18.640 --> 0:52:22.319
<v Speaker 1>lots of aspects to making society better. This is how

0:52:22.400 --> 0:52:25.799
<v Speaker 1>we are doing that. This is why the thing that

0:52:25.800 --> 0:52:29.200
<v Speaker 1>we're adding in is so important. And so I think

0:52:29.239 --> 0:52:34.080
<v Speaker 1>that that's important from the very earliest seedling of the

0:52:34.200 --> 0:52:38.239
<v Speaker 1>idea within all of these projects, but especially the entrepreneurial

0:52:38.239 --> 0:52:41.280
<v Speaker 1>where you're trying to build these institutions that help transform

0:52:41.360 --> 0:52:44.759
<v Speaker 1>society at scale, and so I think it's it's one

0:52:44.760 --> 0:52:48.880
<v Speaker 1>of the things to start with on day zero. That's brilliant.

0:52:48.920 --> 0:52:51.160
<v Speaker 1>I love hearing that. That's music to my ears. Of course,

0:52:51.920 --> 0:52:55.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm the own purpose community because I really believe that it.

0:52:55.600 --> 0:52:57.520
<v Speaker 1>It's always there from the birth of the idea and

0:52:57.560 --> 0:53:01.400
<v Speaker 1>the purposes. What keeps you going and keep you persevering.

0:53:01.520 --> 0:53:04.520
<v Speaker 1>It keeps you through all those crazy late nights and

0:53:04.600 --> 0:53:07.200
<v Speaker 1>early mornings and lack of sleep and the breakdown. Like

0:53:07.239 --> 0:53:10.160
<v Speaker 1>the only thing that keeps you going is your purpose,

0:53:10.520 --> 0:53:13.480
<v Speaker 1>whatever that may be. So I love hearing that. Now, read,

0:53:13.520 --> 0:53:16.040
<v Speaker 1>I want to ask you the final five. These are

0:53:16.080 --> 0:53:17.920
<v Speaker 1>the fast five where you have to answer the questions

0:53:17.960 --> 0:53:20.960
<v Speaker 1>in one word or one sentence maximum, So you have

0:53:21.000 --> 0:53:25.239
<v Speaker 1>one sentence. Please feel free to play with that. Read

0:53:25.280 --> 0:53:28.359
<v Speaker 1>These are your fast five? Are you ready? I hope

0:53:28.360 --> 0:53:32.520
<v Speaker 1>so awesome? I love it. So the first question I

0:53:32.600 --> 0:53:36.560
<v Speaker 1>have for you is, what is the best entrepreneurship advice

0:53:36.600 --> 0:53:41.680
<v Speaker 1>you've ever received? Make decisions quickly and recover when you

0:53:41.719 --> 0:53:45.640
<v Speaker 1>need to. Nice? Okay, great answer. What is the worst

0:53:46.080 --> 0:53:52.680
<v Speaker 1>entrepreneurship advice you've ever received or given? Persevere against all odds. Oh,

0:53:52.120 --> 0:53:55.600
<v Speaker 1>And the answer is because you need to learn right,

0:53:55.680 --> 0:54:01.640
<v Speaker 1>So it is only perseverance. It's also adaptation. Yes, absolutely, pivot, learning, adapting,

0:54:01.800 --> 0:54:05.920
<v Speaker 1>regenerating completely if that's if that's what it takes. Okay.

0:54:06.080 --> 0:54:10.560
<v Speaker 1>Third question, what is something that you once valued that

0:54:10.600 --> 0:54:14.600
<v Speaker 1>you no longer value? Crazy hard work? And what I

0:54:14.640 --> 0:54:17.000
<v Speaker 1>mean by that was it's kind of a youthful thing,

0:54:17.360 --> 0:54:19.800
<v Speaker 1>which is when you're eighteen, you're like, ah, you should

0:54:19.800 --> 0:54:21.480
<v Speaker 1>pull an all nighter, or you should show that you

0:54:21.480 --> 0:54:24.440
<v Speaker 1>could do it by pulling three all nighters. And now

0:54:24.480 --> 0:54:27.399
<v Speaker 1>I'm definitely of the working smart. You have to work

0:54:27.400 --> 0:54:31.839
<v Speaker 1>hard on all these journeys, but working smart is the

0:54:31.880 --> 0:54:37.000
<v Speaker 1>important governor on working hard. I love that great crushing number. Four.

0:54:37.080 --> 0:54:40.360
<v Speaker 1>What's a daily habit that you don't negotiate with that

0:54:40.440 --> 0:54:45.040
<v Speaker 1>you always do no matter what? Adequate sleep? How many

0:54:45.040 --> 0:54:49.960
<v Speaker 1>hours do you sleep? Minimum six with the occasional frequently

0:54:50.000 --> 0:54:52.919
<v Speaker 1>weekends go to eight. Try to have one or two

0:54:53.120 --> 0:54:55.440
<v Speaker 1>nights usually a morning's usually weekends where you don't send

0:54:55.440 --> 0:54:58.200
<v Speaker 1>an alarm and you wake up when your body is

0:54:58.239 --> 0:55:00.400
<v Speaker 1>like okay, I'm ready. Part of this is because we

0:55:00.440 --> 0:55:02.160
<v Speaker 1>go through life, we make decisions all the time. We

0:55:02.200 --> 0:55:04.799
<v Speaker 1>make multiple decisions all the day, and if you're making

0:55:04.840 --> 0:55:07.600
<v Speaker 1>bad decisions, you're gonna error, and so you have to

0:55:07.600 --> 0:55:09.680
<v Speaker 1>be cognitively in the right place, which of course is

0:55:09.719 --> 0:55:14.440
<v Speaker 1>also mindfulness and purpose. But sleep is the baseline. I

0:55:14.480 --> 0:55:16.960
<v Speaker 1>love that that's such a great one, such an important habit,

0:55:17.000 --> 0:55:19.840
<v Speaker 1>and underestimated. As a monk, I didn't sleep very much,

0:55:20.600 --> 0:55:23.759
<v Speaker 1>but today I sleep is one of my biggest values too.

0:55:23.800 --> 0:55:27.240
<v Speaker 1>I couldn't agree more, all right. Fifth and final question, read,

0:55:27.760 --> 0:55:30.560
<v Speaker 1>is if you could create one law that everyone in

0:55:30.560 --> 0:55:34.040
<v Speaker 1>the world had to follow, what would it be? Listen first,

0:55:34.239 --> 0:55:37.640
<v Speaker 1>then speak very very great advice and would be an

0:55:37.680 --> 0:55:41.160
<v Speaker 1>amazing law Read at Hoffman everyone. The book is called

0:55:41.239 --> 0:55:44.960
<v Speaker 1>Masters of Scale, same name as the podcast Surprising Truths

0:55:45.000 --> 0:55:48.120
<v Speaker 1>from the World's most successful Entrepreneurs. You can go out

0:55:48.120 --> 0:55:50.920
<v Speaker 1>and grab it right now. You will not regret it.

0:55:51.000 --> 0:55:52.279
<v Speaker 1>You may want to get it for a friend and

0:55:52.320 --> 0:55:55.600
<v Speaker 1>family member to read again. It has been such a

0:55:55.719 --> 0:55:59.759
<v Speaker 1>joy talking to you, and even through this screen, I

0:56:00.120 --> 0:56:04.680
<v Speaker 1>feel your friendliness, I feel your kindness, I feel your graciousness.

0:56:04.480 --> 0:56:07.360
<v Speaker 1>It's it's truly special. It's truly special. I've had this

0:56:07.440 --> 0:56:10.319
<v Speaker 1>experience and actually the only time. The other time I

0:56:10.320 --> 0:56:12.400
<v Speaker 1>had it this week was actually with someone in person,

0:56:13.120 --> 0:56:15.160
<v Speaker 1>but with you, I'm feeling it through the screen, which

0:56:15.200 --> 0:56:17.239
<v Speaker 1>is really special. So I want to thank you for

0:56:17.320 --> 0:56:21.400
<v Speaker 1>being so present, for being so conscious for our community

0:56:21.400 --> 0:56:24.640
<v Speaker 1>and our audience today. You've really served them beautifully with

0:56:24.680 --> 0:56:28.279
<v Speaker 1>your experience, wisdom, insight. I really really hope everyone goes

0:56:28.320 --> 0:56:30.080
<v Speaker 1>and grabs a copy. I can't wait for people to

0:56:30.120 --> 0:56:32.680
<v Speaker 1>read it, and I really again hope to see you

0:56:32.680 --> 0:56:35.640
<v Speaker 1>in person very soon. So yeah, thank you so much.

0:56:36.200 --> 0:56:38.919
<v Speaker 1>If any of you've been listening or watching, make sure

0:56:39.000 --> 0:56:42.279
<v Speaker 1>that you tweet, Instagram, tag me and read because we'd

0:56:42.280 --> 0:56:44.399
<v Speaker 1>love to see what are the nuggets wisdom that you're

0:56:44.440 --> 0:56:47.960
<v Speaker 1>going to apply, what's the thing that you're practicing, experimenting

0:56:47.960 --> 0:56:50.919
<v Speaker 1>with exploring. I love being able to see what you're

0:56:50.960 --> 0:56:54.040
<v Speaker 1>taking away from these episodes because they helped me understand

0:56:54.239 --> 0:56:56.919
<v Speaker 1>which questions to ask, what to improve, what they make better.

0:56:57.200 --> 0:56:59.960
<v Speaker 1>So please please please tag me and read and again,

0:57:00.000 --> 0:57:02.520
<v Speaker 1>and thank you so much for listening to on Purpose

0:57:02.880 --> 0:57:05.080
<v Speaker 1>and read it. It's been a pleasure. Thank you so much.