WEBVTT - 02/25/21 DPS Hour 2 Nick Wright

0:00:00.680 --> 0:00:03.480
<v Speaker 1>You are listening to the Dan Patrick Show on Fox

0:00:03.560 --> 0:00:06.400
<v Speaker 1>Sports Radio Our two on this Thursday, Dan and The

0:00:06.480 --> 0:00:09.680
<v Speaker 1>dan 's Dan Patrick Show. Yesterday, we sold close to

0:00:09.720 --> 0:00:13.240
<v Speaker 1>four thousand T shirts on the website. Big sale going

0:00:13.240 --> 0:00:16.600
<v Speaker 1>on dan patrick dot com. T shirts just ten dollars.

0:00:16.640 --> 0:00:20.160
<v Speaker 1>We got hats there. Stock is limited going fast. Head

0:00:20.200 --> 0:00:23.239
<v Speaker 1>and shop at dan patrick dot com. Get in on

0:00:23.280 --> 0:00:25.759
<v Speaker 1>all the savings. Got a pull question we update that.

0:00:25.840 --> 0:00:28.560
<v Speaker 1>Will check in with Nick Wright, co host of First

0:00:28.560 --> 0:00:30.880
<v Speaker 1>Things First on Fox Sports One. He'll join us coming

0:00:30.920 --> 0:00:36.360
<v Speaker 1>up momentarily. Jazz roll the Lakers last night one fourteen

0:00:36.400 --> 0:00:38.760
<v Speaker 1>to eighty nine. I know the focus will be on

0:00:38.800 --> 0:00:42.160
<v Speaker 1>the Lakers because that's clickbait, but the Jazz have played

0:00:42.200 --> 0:00:45.559
<v Speaker 1>extremely well. You may not tune in. Maybe last night

0:00:45.720 --> 0:00:47.720
<v Speaker 1>was the first time you tuned in this season to

0:00:47.760 --> 0:00:52.720
<v Speaker 1>see the Utah Jazz. But they're efficient, they are economical.

0:00:52.840 --> 0:00:55.640
<v Speaker 1>They pass the ball, they shoot the three well. They

0:00:55.680 --> 0:00:59.360
<v Speaker 1>probably get as many open looks at the three as

0:00:59.440 --> 0:01:02.080
<v Speaker 1>any team, probably more so than any other team. One

0:01:02.240 --> 0:01:04.360
<v Speaker 1>mcclubn oh I can't wait to wake up no more.

0:01:04.480 --> 0:01:07.679
<v Speaker 1>They get to that YouTube clip of the efficient economical Jazz.

0:01:07.760 --> 0:01:11.360
<v Speaker 1>I said that that you may not it may not

0:01:11.520 --> 0:01:14.319
<v Speaker 1>interest you, but you're not a basketball purist and you

0:01:14.319 --> 0:01:18.080
<v Speaker 1>don't understand the game. I like some passing, I like

0:01:18.240 --> 0:01:23.440
<v Speaker 1>some movement, and Utah Jazz if they played extremely well.

0:01:23.959 --> 0:01:27.400
<v Speaker 1>Now does this translate into anything coming up in May

0:01:27.480 --> 0:01:32.080
<v Speaker 1>or June? Probably not, But last night should have been

0:01:32.120 --> 0:01:34.600
<v Speaker 1>about the Utah Jazz. It won't be. It'll be about

0:01:34.640 --> 0:01:39.040
<v Speaker 1>the Lakers because they lost again without Anthony Davis. The

0:01:39.160 --> 0:01:42.200
<v Speaker 1>NBA playoffs schedule to begin May twenty second, By the way,

0:01:42.240 --> 0:01:44.600
<v Speaker 1>we have no updates on Tiger Woods. Once we do,

0:01:44.680 --> 0:01:47.560
<v Speaker 1>will certainly pass that on to you. Give me the

0:01:47.600 --> 0:01:50.400
<v Speaker 1>poll question. Then we'll get into the popular Nick Wright

0:01:50.640 --> 0:01:53.840
<v Speaker 1>from Fox Sports. First things first, if you were JJ Watt,

0:01:53.840 --> 0:01:56.000
<v Speaker 1>would you rather sign for fifteen million with a good

0:01:56.040 --> 0:01:59.840
<v Speaker 1>team like the Titans or Bills or Packers or a

0:02:00.200 --> 0:02:03.320
<v Speaker 1>title contender like the Bucks or the chief for seven

0:02:03.320 --> 0:02:07.520
<v Speaker 1>point five million? Say the Bucks are the Chiefs. Okay,

0:02:08.200 --> 0:02:11.880
<v Speaker 1>let me start there with Nick Wright, Kansas City Chiefs apologist? Uh,

0:02:12.160 --> 0:02:15.400
<v Speaker 1>could you see J. J. Watt maybe joining come on

0:02:15.440 --> 0:02:18.960
<v Speaker 1>this show? What unbelievable apologist is? At least you got

0:02:18.960 --> 0:02:21.400
<v Speaker 1>my name right this time? Dan, Go ahead, you're gonna

0:02:21.400 --> 0:02:24.360
<v Speaker 1>ask me about JJ Watt. Could you see him joining

0:02:24.400 --> 0:02:26.880
<v Speaker 1>your Kansas City Chiefs to maybe help him win a

0:02:26.919 --> 0:02:31.360
<v Speaker 1>Super Bowl? Yeah? Listen. And as an added bonus for JJ,

0:02:31.919 --> 0:02:36.640
<v Speaker 1>he could go from a fraudulent, awful barbecue city in

0:02:36.760 --> 0:02:40.960
<v Speaker 1>Houston to the greatest barbecue city in America Kansas City, Missouri.

0:02:42.160 --> 0:02:47.119
<v Speaker 1>And the upgrade of organizations and coaches from the Bill

0:02:47.160 --> 0:02:50.680
<v Speaker 1>O'Brien Jack Easterby reign of terror in Houston to the

0:02:50.720 --> 0:02:54.160
<v Speaker 1>Brett Vach Andy Reid tightly run ship in Kansas City.

0:02:54.600 --> 0:02:57.200
<v Speaker 1>It's just night and day. So for all those reasons

0:02:57.240 --> 0:02:59.760
<v Speaker 1>alongside he would actually get to, you know, play in

0:02:59.840 --> 0:03:01.639
<v Speaker 1>and win a Super Bowl. Those things would all be

0:03:01.639 --> 0:03:03.160
<v Speaker 1>good for him. It's great to see you, by the way,

0:03:03.240 --> 0:03:05.320
<v Speaker 1>it's great to see you, Nick. A couple of things

0:03:05.360 --> 0:03:07.200
<v Speaker 1>to talk to you about. I don't know if you

0:03:07.240 --> 0:03:10.399
<v Speaker 1>agree with me. The Jazz, they have been the best

0:03:10.400 --> 0:03:13.240
<v Speaker 1>team in the NBA, least record wise, may not be exciting,

0:03:13.280 --> 0:03:16.480
<v Speaker 1>may not have household names. It's been impressive what they did.

0:03:17.120 --> 0:03:21.120
<v Speaker 1>But the Lakers are clickbait. So what is the headline today?

0:03:21.160 --> 0:03:26.919
<v Speaker 1>The Lakers are the Jazz, but it's not because they're clickbait.

0:03:27.000 --> 0:03:29.040
<v Speaker 1>But let me let me go to the Jazz. First,

0:03:29.360 --> 0:03:31.480
<v Speaker 1>I heard the beginning of the segment, but I didn't

0:03:31.480 --> 0:03:33.919
<v Speaker 1>hear the very very first words out of your mouth.

0:03:34.280 --> 0:03:37.200
<v Speaker 1>It was odd to me. Why were you spending the

0:03:37.240 --> 0:03:40.160
<v Speaker 1>open of this hour talking about the twenty fifteen Atlanta

0:03:40.160 --> 0:03:43.680
<v Speaker 1>Hawks or was it the twenty eighteen Toronto Raptors. I'm

0:03:43.720 --> 0:03:47.320
<v Speaker 1>not sure. It sounded a lot like that this team. Listen.

0:03:47.360 --> 0:03:48.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm not going to go out on the limb and

0:03:49.040 --> 0:03:51.640
<v Speaker 1>say they're actually, you know, going to be good in

0:03:51.680 --> 0:03:55.680
<v Speaker 1>the playoffs. But man, oh man, have you seen Jordan

0:03:55.800 --> 0:03:59.320
<v Speaker 1>Clarkson's true shooting percentage? Because if you don't give them

0:03:59.320 --> 0:04:03.680
<v Speaker 1>the respect, if you don't understand that Georgis Yang is

0:04:03.720 --> 0:04:06.880
<v Speaker 1>going to be just a playoff sniper, well, you're not

0:04:06.920 --> 0:04:11.640
<v Speaker 1>a sophisticated Area Nite basketball fan. We've seen this team before. Okay, wait,

0:04:11.760 --> 0:04:14.840
<v Speaker 1>are you not interested in the Jazz because they're not

0:04:15.000 --> 0:04:19.880
<v Speaker 1>interesting or non threatening? What's the Well, I just there's

0:04:20.000 --> 0:04:22.839
<v Speaker 1>a half dozen teams that with a gun to your head,

0:04:23.200 --> 0:04:25.640
<v Speaker 1>you would pick over them to win the title, just

0:04:25.800 --> 0:04:28.599
<v Speaker 1>like the twenty fifteen Hawks. Remember the twenty fifteen Hawks,

0:04:28.600 --> 0:04:31.840
<v Speaker 1>they had their entire team one player of the bump.

0:04:32.200 --> 0:04:34.040
<v Speaker 1>Do you know why that happened, because it's like, well,

0:04:34.080 --> 0:04:35.800
<v Speaker 1>we know none of them are that good, but they

0:04:35.800 --> 0:04:38.080
<v Speaker 1>were seventeen to oh, so we gotta give it to them.

0:04:38.279 --> 0:04:40.919
<v Speaker 1>We've seen this story before. It's a fun, nice, cute story,

0:04:41.160 --> 0:04:43.160
<v Speaker 1>and I'm glad for the people of Utah that they

0:04:43.200 --> 0:04:45.520
<v Speaker 1>get it. But this is not a This is not

0:04:45.600 --> 0:04:49.719
<v Speaker 1>a contender in any stretch of the imagination. Now, the Lakers,

0:04:49.920 --> 0:04:52.440
<v Speaker 1>we've also seen this story before. Do you know what

0:04:52.480 --> 0:04:55.640
<v Speaker 1>this Lakers team reminds me of the first Laker team

0:04:55.720 --> 0:04:58.240
<v Speaker 1>Lebron was on. It's like Lebron and a bunch of

0:04:58.279 --> 0:05:03.080
<v Speaker 1>okay pieces because you don't have Anthony Davis and Shrewder

0:05:03.120 --> 0:05:06.040
<v Speaker 1>but more so Davis. That's what this team is. And

0:05:06.120 --> 0:05:09.599
<v Speaker 1>so yeah, like I don't actually think either's a huge

0:05:09.640 --> 0:05:12.920
<v Speaker 1>deal because here's what we know about the Lakers. If

0:05:12.960 --> 0:05:15.279
<v Speaker 1>Anthony Davis is not around for the playoffs, they can't

0:05:15.320 --> 0:05:18.120
<v Speaker 1>win the title. But he's gonna be around for the playoffs,

0:05:18.320 --> 0:05:22.560
<v Speaker 1>so I'm not overly concerned with it. And Lebron is

0:05:22.600 --> 0:05:26.440
<v Speaker 1>having every go through his Basketball Reference game log. It's

0:05:26.520 --> 0:05:30.279
<v Speaker 1>usually January, but he has it down two weeks shortly

0:05:30.320 --> 0:05:33.040
<v Speaker 1>before the All Star break. He's that's what's going on

0:05:33.120 --> 0:05:35.760
<v Speaker 1>with him right now? And his shot has failed him

0:05:35.760 --> 0:05:38.159
<v Speaker 1>for the last month. It'll come back, Lakers will be

0:05:38.160 --> 0:05:43.719
<v Speaker 1>fine this load management with Lebron. What should be the

0:05:43.720 --> 0:05:47.000
<v Speaker 1>approach by the Lakers? What should be the approach by Lebron?

0:05:48.960 --> 0:05:52.360
<v Speaker 1>I have listened. I am I'm thirty six years old,

0:05:52.400 --> 0:05:54.920
<v Speaker 1>which makes me a millennial, but there are certain things

0:05:54.960 --> 0:05:57.640
<v Speaker 1>about me that I feel like I am of your generation,

0:05:57.680 --> 0:06:00.400
<v Speaker 1>which you were? You're the silent generation, right Dan, I'm

0:06:00.400 --> 0:06:03.960
<v Speaker 1>not sure which one, but whichever one it is, the

0:06:04.279 --> 0:06:07.479
<v Speaker 1>which is I have this controversial take for people my age,

0:06:07.920 --> 0:06:11.479
<v Speaker 1>which is, when healthy and available, you should go to work.

0:06:12.000 --> 0:06:14.760
<v Speaker 1>Lebron's healthy, he's available, he should probably go to work.

0:06:15.279 --> 0:06:20.040
<v Speaker 1>And Lebron is in this odd almost singular spot as

0:06:20.080 --> 0:06:25.039
<v Speaker 1>an athlete, which is, we operate from the perspective of

0:06:25.360 --> 0:06:29.560
<v Speaker 1>we have to criticize him. So what so if Lebron

0:06:29.720 --> 0:06:32.360
<v Speaker 1>was taking a lot of time off, do we think

0:06:32.400 --> 0:06:35.680
<v Speaker 1>that would be like, you know what, smart, good job Lebron,

0:06:36.160 --> 0:06:39.680
<v Speaker 1>hetty play not overworking. No, you would be criticized for it.

0:06:39.920 --> 0:06:43.640
<v Speaker 1>Lebron is now being criticized for playing every game. Now,

0:06:43.839 --> 0:06:46.559
<v Speaker 1>do I think guys in an eighty two game season.

0:06:46.560 --> 0:06:49.159
<v Speaker 1>It's smart to play all eighty two, Probably not, and

0:06:49.240 --> 0:06:52.039
<v Speaker 1>Lebron's only done that in the later part of his career.

0:06:52.080 --> 0:06:54.960
<v Speaker 1>One time is last year with the Cavs. But I

0:06:55.040 --> 0:06:59.560
<v Speaker 1>also think the league was dan three years ago in

0:06:59.600 --> 0:07:02.479
<v Speaker 1>a very very dangerous spot with the load management. Do

0:07:02.520 --> 0:07:07.040
<v Speaker 1>you remember the nationally televised Spurs Warriors game. Both teams

0:07:07.040 --> 0:07:10.440
<v Speaker 1>were like on pace for sixty five wins and nobody played.

0:07:10.800 --> 0:07:13.760
<v Speaker 1>Kawhi didn't play, Katee didn't play, stepped in't play, Clay

0:07:13.800 --> 0:07:17.040
<v Speaker 1>didn't play, and it was becoming a trim And I

0:07:17.080 --> 0:07:21.920
<v Speaker 1>think Lebron is helping stop that because while guys will

0:07:21.920 --> 0:07:25.800
<v Speaker 1>still rest on some back to backs, if Lebron jumped

0:07:25.840 --> 0:07:28.760
<v Speaker 1>on the Kawhi Leonard from last year load management plan,

0:07:29.200 --> 0:07:32.440
<v Speaker 1>then it would become even more accepted, and that'd be

0:07:32.560 --> 0:07:35.800
<v Speaker 1>terrible for the business of basketball. So I think Lebron's

0:07:35.840 --> 0:07:39.520
<v Speaker 1>responsibility was teammates and a bigger responsibility to the league

0:07:39.840 --> 0:07:41.720
<v Speaker 1>to kind of remind guys, hey, I'm the oldest guy

0:07:41.720 --> 0:07:45.120
<v Speaker 1>out here, I've played more minutes than everybody. I'm available.

0:07:45.400 --> 0:07:48.040
<v Speaker 1>Let's try to be more available to our fans and

0:07:48.080 --> 0:07:51.120
<v Speaker 1>to our teammates. It almost seems like he's doing it

0:07:51.200 --> 0:07:54.800
<v Speaker 1>on purpose to deliver this message like, Hey, I'm an

0:07:54.840 --> 0:07:57.640
<v Speaker 1>old school and I agree with you. You show up

0:07:57.640 --> 0:08:00.200
<v Speaker 1>for work. I mean, my generation, which is a lot

0:08:00.240 --> 0:08:03.160
<v Speaker 1>older than yours, we just showed up for work. We

0:08:03.280 --> 0:08:05.480
<v Speaker 1>didn't get a pat on the back. You just went

0:08:05.560 --> 0:08:08.480
<v Speaker 1>to work. Lebron is going to work. But is it

0:08:08.720 --> 0:08:13.080
<v Speaker 1>smart because his goal is to win a championship and

0:08:13.160 --> 0:08:16.480
<v Speaker 1>be an MVP in that order, is it smart on

0:08:16.600 --> 0:08:19.680
<v Speaker 1>his part to be showing up and playing every night?

0:08:20.360 --> 0:08:25.400
<v Speaker 1>I think it is for him specifically because he has

0:08:25.640 --> 0:08:30.240
<v Speaker 1>shown He and Carl Malone are the only guys in

0:08:30.360 --> 0:08:34.720
<v Speaker 1>league history that I think we can say they their

0:08:34.920 --> 0:08:38.800
<v Speaker 1>body just seems to handle wear and tear differently than

0:08:39.000 --> 0:08:41.959
<v Speaker 1>everyone else. Ever, I mean, he slipped on a wet

0:08:41.960 --> 0:08:44.280
<v Speaker 1>spot on Christmas Day his first year with the Lakers

0:08:44.280 --> 0:08:47.880
<v Speaker 1>and tours growing. Aside from that, he's been indestructible. And

0:08:47.960 --> 0:08:52.080
<v Speaker 1>so I never once watched the playoff series with Lebron

0:08:52.120 --> 0:08:54.240
<v Speaker 1>have been like, you know what, he looks hired, He

0:08:54.360 --> 0:08:57.079
<v Speaker 1>plays more minutes and he looks fine. So I do

0:08:57.160 --> 0:09:00.600
<v Speaker 1>think for certain guys there is an element of you

0:09:00.720 --> 0:09:03.040
<v Speaker 1>need to be peeking at the end of the year.

0:09:03.240 --> 0:09:04.880
<v Speaker 1>But the other thing, and I would I have this

0:09:05.000 --> 0:09:09.040
<v Speaker 1>question for you, Dan. Some of it seems like pseudoscience

0:09:09.160 --> 0:09:13.000
<v Speaker 1>and guesswork, because what happened with Paul George a few

0:09:13.040 --> 0:09:16.719
<v Speaker 1>days ago, it was like it's it's like, okay, he's

0:09:16.720 --> 0:09:19.200
<v Speaker 1>at thirty two and a half minutes, not a second more.

0:09:19.520 --> 0:09:22.680
<v Speaker 1>Do you know what? It reminded me of thirty five

0:09:22.800 --> 0:09:25.920
<v Speaker 1>years ago Jordan when he was coming off the foot injury.

0:09:25.960 --> 0:09:27.520
<v Speaker 1>And I only remember it because he was in the

0:09:27.600 --> 0:09:30.400
<v Speaker 1>last dance. He wanted to come back in the game

0:09:30.440 --> 0:09:32.520
<v Speaker 1>in the last minute. Remember he was arguing with the

0:09:32.559 --> 0:09:35.920
<v Speaker 1>coach and that doctors came down They're like, no, eighteen

0:09:35.920 --> 0:09:39.960
<v Speaker 1>minutes maximum. I'm like, really with this is by our

0:09:40.160 --> 0:09:43.880
<v Speaker 1>science is like, is like our train system, how did

0:09:43.880 --> 0:09:45.720
<v Speaker 1>you move Cole one hundred years ago? Put it on

0:09:45.720 --> 0:09:48.040
<v Speaker 1>a train. We haven't improved that, and we're not improving

0:09:48.080 --> 0:09:50.600
<v Speaker 1>this either. It's like we guess an amount of minutes,

0:09:50.640 --> 0:09:53.480
<v Speaker 1>and that's what it is. So I don't even people

0:09:53.520 --> 0:09:55.680
<v Speaker 1>are like, oh, you've got to listen to the science.

0:09:56.160 --> 0:09:59.640
<v Speaker 1>But I think on the minute stuff, the science is guessing.

0:10:00.200 --> 0:10:03.760
<v Speaker 1>It's just really guesswork. And I've never seen evidence otherwise.

0:10:03.800 --> 0:10:06.800
<v Speaker 1>And in baseball Dan, which I don't talk about a lot,

0:10:06.800 --> 0:10:10.120
<v Speaker 1>but you do it somewhat. It's Jeff Passon wrote a

0:10:10.160 --> 0:10:12.800
<v Speaker 1>great book that since they have been more focused on

0:10:12.880 --> 0:10:16.920
<v Speaker 1>pitch counts like pitch arm, injuries have gone up. So

0:10:17.000 --> 0:10:20.640
<v Speaker 1>some of this I just don't think we have mastered yet.

0:10:20.920 --> 0:10:22.920
<v Speaker 1>And I think airing on the side of all play

0:10:22.960 --> 0:10:25.600
<v Speaker 1>when I'm healthy is pretty smart. He's nick Right, co

0:10:25.679 --> 0:10:28.240
<v Speaker 1>host of First Things First on Fox Sports One. Kyrie

0:10:28.240 --> 0:10:31.200
<v Speaker 1>Irving had something on Instagram where he said, maybe we

0:10:31.320 --> 0:10:35.600
<v Speaker 1>changed the logo from Jerry West to Kobe Bryant. Could

0:10:35.640 --> 0:10:37.840
<v Speaker 1>you see the league? I know Jerry West would be

0:10:37.880 --> 0:10:41.520
<v Speaker 1>fine with that because Jerry's embarrassed to be the logo,

0:10:43.000 --> 0:10:45.280
<v Speaker 1>and he brought Kobe into the league, brought him into

0:10:45.280 --> 0:10:48.360
<v Speaker 1>the Lakers. Could you see where the league would sign

0:10:48.400 --> 0:10:52.600
<v Speaker 1>off on Kobe replacing Jerry West is the logo. So

0:10:53.080 --> 0:10:55.720
<v Speaker 1>a few things. One is I read and I didn't

0:10:55.760 --> 0:10:58.959
<v Speaker 1>read a full article about it, but I did read

0:10:59.080 --> 0:11:02.000
<v Speaker 1>yesterday that one of the reasons it has stayed Jerry

0:11:02.040 --> 0:11:04.920
<v Speaker 1>West is they don't have to pay any royalties on

0:11:04.960 --> 0:11:07.600
<v Speaker 1>that logo. And I think if you did it with

0:11:07.720 --> 0:11:13.080
<v Speaker 1>Kobe or with anybody Lebron's block on Iguadala, Michael Jordan anything,

0:11:13.559 --> 0:11:16.000
<v Speaker 1>all of a sudden, you're gonna have to pay a

0:11:16.120 --> 0:11:19.440
<v Speaker 1>royalty on every and that seems untenable. To go from

0:11:19.559 --> 0:11:22.679
<v Speaker 1>zero dollars to even if it's just a small percentage.

0:11:22.880 --> 0:11:26.600
<v Speaker 1>I just don't think that's realistic. I do think, though,

0:11:27.080 --> 0:11:29.280
<v Speaker 1>if I'm going to touch a third rail here, that

0:11:29.440 --> 0:11:33.400
<v Speaker 1>Kyrie in his comment on the idea, like his second line,

0:11:33.760 --> 0:11:36.920
<v Speaker 1>he did raise it to me a valid point, which

0:11:37.000 --> 0:11:39.520
<v Speaker 1>is the NBA is a black league. It is an

0:11:39.559 --> 0:11:42.960
<v Speaker 1>overwhelmingly black league, and the success of the league has

0:11:43.000 --> 0:11:46.360
<v Speaker 1>been built for the vast majority by black players. And

0:11:46.480 --> 0:11:49.480
<v Speaker 1>it does seem a little anachronistic that we've got a

0:11:49.480 --> 0:11:52.880
<v Speaker 1>white dude from nineteen sixty two is the logo. But

0:11:52.920 --> 0:11:54.800
<v Speaker 1>I also think do I think a lot of people

0:11:54.840 --> 0:11:58.000
<v Speaker 1>don't even know that he's the logo? You know? You

0:11:58.040 --> 0:11:59.880
<v Speaker 1>know what, I know what, I think most fans probably

0:12:00.080 --> 0:12:05.040
<v Speaker 1>don't know that that's an actual person that in that logo. Yeah,

0:12:05.080 --> 0:12:07.679
<v Speaker 1>and you know, having spoke to Jerry West about this,

0:12:08.120 --> 0:12:10.760
<v Speaker 1>you know you can tell where I don't think they

0:12:10.760 --> 0:12:14.320
<v Speaker 1>conferred with him. They basically just made him the logo

0:12:14.440 --> 0:12:17.360
<v Speaker 1>and then he didn't really acknowledge it for a long time.

0:12:17.440 --> 0:12:20.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, growing up, I sort of knew it was

0:12:20.120 --> 0:12:23.680
<v Speaker 1>Jerry because there was a picture that accompanied that logo picture.

0:12:23.720 --> 0:12:28.760
<v Speaker 1>But Jerry is embarrassed almost to bring that up. And

0:12:28.840 --> 0:12:30.559
<v Speaker 1>I agree with you. I don't know if the NBA

0:12:30.640 --> 0:12:33.280
<v Speaker 1>can go, hey, we're gonna have Kobe as the logo.

0:12:34.000 --> 0:12:37.680
<v Speaker 1>What's it going to cost us? Right? But I don't know.

0:12:38.920 --> 0:12:42.319
<v Speaker 1>I think Kyrie's onto something, but I don't know if

0:12:42.080 --> 0:12:45.520
<v Speaker 1>if if he's onto something that will actually come to fruition. Well,

0:12:45.559 --> 0:12:49.360
<v Speaker 1>I wonder I wonder if renaming some of these awards,

0:12:50.200 --> 0:12:55.040
<v Speaker 1>so the Larry O'Brien, I don't think that's gonna change.

0:12:55.400 --> 0:12:59.000
<v Speaker 1>They just named the finals MVP the Bill Russell. You

0:12:59.040 --> 0:13:00.600
<v Speaker 1>know that that happened a few years ago. I think

0:13:00.600 --> 0:13:03.040
<v Speaker 1>that's good. Does and I apologize for not knowing this.

0:13:03.280 --> 0:13:08.479
<v Speaker 1>Does League MVP? Does that trophy a have an honorific

0:13:08.960 --> 0:13:11.160
<v Speaker 1>because I think a lot of people feel like Kobe

0:13:11.200 --> 0:13:14.920
<v Speaker 1>should have won more than one League MVP. He only

0:13:14.920 --> 0:13:17.960
<v Speaker 1>won the one naming that after him almost as a league.

0:13:18.000 --> 0:13:20.800
<v Speaker 1>I do feel like there should be something done for Kobe,

0:13:21.000 --> 0:13:24.400
<v Speaker 1>and I do feel like we should maybe update some

0:13:24.480 --> 0:13:27.640
<v Speaker 1>of these names to the more modernized MBA, But I

0:13:27.640 --> 0:13:30.760
<v Speaker 1>don't know if the logo is what they're going to

0:13:30.840 --> 0:13:33.520
<v Speaker 1>do with it. Yeah, I don't see it happening, but

0:13:33.800 --> 0:13:38.720
<v Speaker 1>I look, I appreciate what Kyrie. That Kyrie has a personality.

0:13:39.040 --> 0:13:41.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't always agree with it, but that he does.

0:13:41.960 --> 0:13:45.360
<v Speaker 1>He is a thinker. Sometimes he thinks too much, sometimes

0:13:45.360 --> 0:13:48.520
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't think enough, but you know that he was

0:13:48.640 --> 0:13:52.520
<v Speaker 1>It's a nice gesture on his part and Kyrie it was.

0:13:52.640 --> 0:13:56.760
<v Speaker 1>If you remember, after Kobe's passing, Kyrie took some time

0:13:56.800 --> 0:14:01.360
<v Speaker 1>away and Kyrie was exception league close with Kobe. And

0:14:01.440 --> 0:14:03.839
<v Speaker 1>I think Kyrie, we don't look at it because he's

0:14:03.880 --> 0:14:07.000
<v Speaker 1>so much smaller, but he's modeled a lot of his

0:14:07.120 --> 0:14:10.560
<v Speaker 1>game after Kobe, even though the games are different. Yeah,

0:14:10.600 --> 0:14:16.360
<v Speaker 1>I listen just because sometimes the people who have at

0:14:16.440 --> 0:14:20.480
<v Speaker 1>times the worst ideas often are also the people that

0:14:20.520 --> 0:14:22.600
<v Speaker 1>come up with some of the best ideas. And so

0:14:22.680 --> 0:14:26.480
<v Speaker 1>I feel like this happens in television and radio production

0:14:26.560 --> 0:14:29.160
<v Speaker 1>meetings a lot. The person that is most likely that

0:14:29.200 --> 0:14:31.160
<v Speaker 1>when they throw something out there, you're gonna be like,

0:14:31.520 --> 0:14:34.240
<v Speaker 1>why do we let that guy talk is also a

0:14:34.280 --> 0:14:36.960
<v Speaker 1>guy who about once a week you're like Oh, that's brilliant.

0:14:37.360 --> 0:14:39.480
<v Speaker 1>And I feel like, you know, Kyrie throws a lot

0:14:39.520 --> 0:14:41.720
<v Speaker 1>out there. Some of it's a little wacky, but I

0:14:41.800 --> 0:14:45.080
<v Speaker 1>think he was onto something here without a doubt. I

0:14:45.160 --> 0:14:47.840
<v Speaker 1>think of his last February. Poully did the research that

0:14:48.160 --> 0:14:52.160
<v Speaker 1>the All Star MVP is named after Kobe Brynt. Right,

0:14:52.240 --> 0:14:55.880
<v Speaker 1>they changed it last year. But that's also that's like

0:14:55.960 --> 0:15:00.040
<v Speaker 1>are award you know what I mean? I know, do

0:15:00.200 --> 0:15:02.320
<v Speaker 1>something named the scoring title after him? I don't know,

0:15:02.720 --> 0:15:07.600
<v Speaker 1>do something like Bradley Beale, come on down and receive

0:15:07.680 --> 0:15:11.480
<v Speaker 1>the Kobe Bryant, receive the Kobe Bryant. Yeah, yeah, I

0:15:11.520 --> 0:15:14.480
<v Speaker 1>like it. Do you want in on the JJ Watt

0:15:14.920 --> 0:15:18.160
<v Speaker 1>game that we played. We've played it already where we

0:15:18.200 --> 0:15:20.360
<v Speaker 1>think he's gonna end up. Do you do you want to? Sure?

0:15:20.440 --> 0:15:23.680
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, you got one pick. I got one pick.

0:15:24.280 --> 0:15:26.760
<v Speaker 1>Here we go, Hold on, here we go. Here's here's

0:15:26.840 --> 0:15:31.520
<v Speaker 1>the Nick Wright green Bay, Green Bay. Okay, that's my

0:15:31.600 --> 0:15:34.000
<v Speaker 1>pick going on a limb there. I don't know if

0:15:34.000 --> 0:15:35.840
<v Speaker 1>it's a limb. I just think Green Bay they have

0:15:35.920 --> 0:15:38.720
<v Speaker 1>good cheese, not good barbecue. Come come to can't see

0:15:38.760 --> 0:15:41.640
<v Speaker 1>with the barbecue? JJ? Stay for the championships that would

0:15:41.720 --> 0:15:45.200
<v Speaker 1>be my recommendation. Well, you have lived in Houston, so

0:15:45.360 --> 0:15:47.720
<v Speaker 1>you you are. Yeah, I lived there for four years

0:15:47.760 --> 0:15:50.840
<v Speaker 1>and ate what they Listen Houston folks say it's been

0:15:50.880 --> 0:15:55.520
<v Speaker 1>tough times. I empathize with you immensely. But Texas barbecue

0:15:56.520 --> 0:16:01.040
<v Speaker 1>is fraudulent and not It's not like bad compared to

0:16:01.040 --> 0:16:05.680
<v Speaker 1>its reputation. It's bad compared to food. It's just not good.

0:16:06.200 --> 0:16:08.560
<v Speaker 1>It's the hottest take anyone's going to deliver all year.

0:16:08.640 --> 0:16:15.440
<v Speaker 1>Texas barbecue not good. Thank you, Nick, We appreciate your time.

0:16:15.520 --> 0:16:18.640
<v Speaker 1>As always, that's the popular Nick Right, co host of

0:16:18.680 --> 0:16:22.440
<v Speaker 1>First Things First on Funk Sports one. Once again, that

0:16:22.560 --> 0:16:25.920
<v Speaker 1>was Nick Wright's opinion on Texas barbecue. Paul, you guys

0:16:25.920 --> 0:16:29.240
<v Speaker 1>went on a sojourn in Houston at the Super Bowl

0:16:29.280 --> 0:16:32.760
<v Speaker 1>with Houston barbecue right now, He's got a point maybe

0:16:32.800 --> 0:16:35.400
<v Speaker 1>if he's saying Houston doesn't have a specific style to Houston.

0:16:35.440 --> 0:16:38.880
<v Speaker 1>It's more Texas barbecue, beef brisket and so forth, and

0:16:39.160 --> 0:16:41.520
<v Speaker 1>Kansas City style barbecue. It's got more of like a

0:16:41.560 --> 0:16:44.520
<v Speaker 1>tomato based sauce on it. You know, there's less pulled

0:16:44.560 --> 0:16:47.880
<v Speaker 1>pork down in Houston. I don't know. I love Texas barbecue.

0:16:47.920 --> 0:16:50.840
<v Speaker 1>But it doesn't. Kansas City has its own style that's

0:16:50.920 --> 0:16:54.320
<v Speaker 1>unique to their town, and so as Memphis. Memphis is

0:16:54.400 --> 0:16:56.800
<v Speaker 1>more of a sticky sauce. See, I would go Memphis.

0:16:58.040 --> 0:17:00.400
<v Speaker 1>Memphis is more of the more of a Northern style

0:17:00.400 --> 0:17:02.560
<v Speaker 1>where if there is a Northern style where it's more

0:17:02.600 --> 0:17:05.040
<v Speaker 1>sticky sauce, Kansas City is a little more tomato based.

0:17:05.600 --> 0:17:08.520
<v Speaker 1>If you want something good North Carolina, it's called Lexington

0:17:08.560 --> 0:17:11.160
<v Speaker 1>barbecue Lexington style. It's more of a vinegar. Oh man,

0:17:11.200 --> 0:17:15.200
<v Speaker 1>that's good too. I could do this all day. Uh,

0:17:15.640 --> 0:17:17.560
<v Speaker 1>Kansas City does have its own style more so than

0:17:17.600 --> 0:17:20.280
<v Speaker 1>Houston does. Not better or worse. We'll take a break.

0:17:20.720 --> 0:17:23.000
<v Speaker 1>We'll get to phone calls coming up. Eight seven seven,

0:17:23.080 --> 0:17:25.639
<v Speaker 1>three D P show. More on the Lakers lost to

0:17:25.720 --> 0:17:28.359
<v Speaker 1>the Jazz last night. Am I sensing a lot of us?

0:17:28.440 --> 0:17:31.920
<v Speaker 1>Stay in your lane. I know something, all believe me.

0:17:32.720 --> 0:17:36.919
<v Speaker 1>I know it's coming. Actually, Houston is known for a

0:17:37.000 --> 0:17:40.840
<v Speaker 1>very specific brand of mesquite that you know all of

0:17:40.880 --> 0:17:46.800
<v Speaker 1>that show. Nick right, he's not welcome back. I didn't

0:17:46.800 --> 0:17:49.720
<v Speaker 1>know we were going there, but Nick Wright gave you

0:17:49.800 --> 0:17:51.720
<v Speaker 1>that to you is the hottest take on the year.

0:17:53.680 --> 0:17:56.479
<v Speaker 1>We'll take a break. It's coming up. Didn't he call

0:17:56.480 --> 0:18:01.280
<v Speaker 1>it fraudulent? I could. He could have just said, But

0:18:01.400 --> 0:18:03.920
<v Speaker 1>knowing Nick, he can't just say one time. It's one

0:18:03.960 --> 0:18:05.800
<v Speaker 1>thing to compare one barbecue to the other. He said

0:18:05.880 --> 0:18:10.480
<v Speaker 1>food in general, any food that you might like. Take

0:18:10.520 --> 0:18:12.800
<v Speaker 1>a break back after this and the Dan Patrick Show.

0:18:14.200 --> 0:18:17.119
<v Speaker 1>I walked in today and got a spring in my step.

0:18:17.160 --> 0:18:22.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm ready to go. I got an energy, and it's

0:18:22.320 --> 0:18:24.880
<v Speaker 1>got to be based on what I'm doing every single day.

0:18:25.400 --> 0:18:28.200
<v Speaker 1>I eat right, get a lot of sleep, drink a

0:18:28.240 --> 0:18:31.560
<v Speaker 1>lot of water. Take a great supplement, M Drive supplement

0:18:31.600 --> 0:18:34.520
<v Speaker 1>for guys who want to stay on top, powerful ingredients

0:18:34.520 --> 0:18:37.680
<v Speaker 1>back by science. I get energy and stronger, leaner. And

0:18:38.440 --> 0:18:40.680
<v Speaker 1>when I was an athlete, I was certainly competitive. I'm

0:18:40.720 --> 0:18:43.000
<v Speaker 1>still competitive even though I'm not an athlete. But you

0:18:43.000 --> 0:18:45.639
<v Speaker 1>want to bring that spirit to the show, like we

0:18:45.720 --> 0:18:49.320
<v Speaker 1>compete every single day, every days the super Bowl. If

0:18:49.320 --> 0:18:51.960
<v Speaker 1>you're gaining weight, you're tired, you're just you're sluggish in

0:18:52.000 --> 0:18:55.080
<v Speaker 1>the morning, then you got to change things up. Try

0:18:55.160 --> 0:18:57.160
<v Speaker 1>M Drive for yourself. They have a lot of great things.

0:18:57.240 --> 0:18:59.520
<v Speaker 1>You can go to M Drive dan dot com today

0:18:59.560 --> 0:19:01.560
<v Speaker 1>and see what they have on their website. But you

0:19:01.600 --> 0:19:05.520
<v Speaker 1>can get this supplement at Walgreen's Right Aid and Vitamin Shop.

0:19:05.640 --> 0:19:08.240
<v Speaker 1>You can get free shipping, sixty day money back guarantee,

0:19:08.320 --> 0:19:10.840
<v Speaker 1>so don't let age beat you. Go to M drive

0:19:10.920 --> 0:19:14.520
<v Speaker 1>dan dot com today rEFInd your prime with M drive.

0:19:14.680 --> 0:19:17.199
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening to the Dan Patrick Show podcast. Be

0:19:17.240 --> 0:19:19.800
<v Speaker 1>sure to catch us live every weekday morning nine until

0:19:19.840 --> 0:19:23.000
<v Speaker 1>noon eastern six to nine Pacific on Fox Sports Radio,

0:19:23.080 --> 0:19:26.040
<v Speaker 1>and you can find us on the iHeartRadio app at

0:19:26.080 --> 0:19:29.600
<v Speaker 1>FSR or stream us live on the Peacock app. Sign

0:19:29.720 --> 0:19:32.880
<v Speaker 1>up for the DP Show newsletter, available daily at six

0:19:32.960 --> 0:19:35.800
<v Speaker 1>eastern three Pacific. Go to dan patrick dot com. Enter

0:19:35.880 --> 0:19:39.560
<v Speaker 1>your email address in the box that slides out bottom

0:19:39.600 --> 0:19:43.320
<v Speaker 1>right hand corner. You're good to go. Take us up

0:19:43.320 --> 0:19:45.439
<v Speaker 1>on the biggest sale we've ever had on all of

0:19:45.440 --> 0:19:49.680
<v Speaker 1>our gear. Dan Patrick dot com t shirt sys ten dollars.

0:19:49.680 --> 0:19:53.080
<v Speaker 1>We sold close to four thousand yesterday. I don't know

0:19:53.119 --> 0:19:55.840
<v Speaker 1>what is left. Stock is limited, but there's hats there.

0:19:56.560 --> 0:19:59.880
<v Speaker 1>We got glasses there as well. But you can shop

0:20:00.080 --> 0:20:04.160
<v Speaker 1>your to your heart's content at dan patrick dot com.

0:20:04.200 --> 0:20:07.360
<v Speaker 1>Get in on all the savings. They're twenty one players

0:20:07.440 --> 0:20:09.280
<v Speaker 1>all time in the NBA who have made at least

0:20:09.280 --> 0:20:15.080
<v Speaker 1>two hundred million dollars. Thirteen are active stat of the

0:20:15.240 --> 0:20:18.320
<v Speaker 1>day stat of the day that past out of the

0:20:18.480 --> 0:20:23.359
<v Speaker 1>day stat of the day here comes that what stat

0:20:23.440 --> 0:20:28.080
<v Speaker 1>of the day? I'm not sure if I have the

0:20:28.160 --> 0:20:32.160
<v Speaker 1>names of the players who have made two hundred million dollars.

0:20:32.359 --> 0:20:34.840
<v Speaker 1>I did say that. You know, you have the Boston

0:20:34.840 --> 0:20:38.360
<v Speaker 1>Celtics with Jalen Brown and Jason Tatum and they made

0:20:38.359 --> 0:20:41.040
<v Speaker 1>the All Star team for a team that is under

0:20:41.119 --> 0:20:45.800
<v Speaker 1>five hundred. What's happened before? This is not the first

0:20:45.840 --> 0:20:49.480
<v Speaker 1>time that it's happened. Last five times that had happened.

0:20:51.720 --> 0:20:55.720
<v Speaker 1>Let's see, was that Bosh and Wade in twenty fourteen

0:20:55.760 --> 0:20:59.320
<v Speaker 1>with the Heat the Lakers, by the way, that's a

0:20:59.400 --> 0:21:06.200
<v Speaker 1>year right, Lebron left okay UH twenty twelve, Dwight Howard

0:21:06.240 --> 0:21:11.600
<v Speaker 1>and Kobe Bryant, Paul Pearson Rondo in twenty eleven with

0:21:11.680 --> 0:21:20.280
<v Speaker 1>the Celtics, Antoine Jamison and Karn Butler. He's an All

0:21:20.320 --> 0:21:25.280
<v Speaker 1>Star seven and UH the O six nets Jason Kidd

0:21:25.320 --> 0:21:28.960
<v Speaker 1>and Vince Card. So it has happened before. It feels

0:21:29.000 --> 0:21:31.800
<v Speaker 1>like these are championship teams that were on their way

0:21:31.840 --> 0:21:35.520
<v Speaker 1>down right after their championships. By the way, some more

0:21:35.600 --> 0:21:39.560
<v Speaker 1>love for the Utah Jazz. The Jazz have four players

0:21:39.640 --> 0:21:42.360
<v Speaker 1>averaging at least fifteen points a game. Toronto's the only

0:21:42.400 --> 0:21:44.400
<v Speaker 1>other team and it has that. No, once again, these

0:21:44.400 --> 0:21:46.679
<v Speaker 1>aren't reasons for you to tune in to watch the Jazz,

0:21:46.720 --> 0:21:50.160
<v Speaker 1>and that's not what I'm saying. You can if you want,

0:21:50.280 --> 0:21:53.360
<v Speaker 1>and you can join me. When I watched the Utah Jazz,

0:21:53.840 --> 0:21:58.560
<v Speaker 1>the jazz team makes six more three pointers per game

0:21:58.600 --> 0:22:01.720
<v Speaker 1>than its opponent. That's the best differential for any team.

0:22:01.800 --> 0:22:06.000
<v Speaker 1>All Ton, Yes, you're not watching the Jazz. You're appreciating

0:22:06.000 --> 0:22:08.960
<v Speaker 1>the Jazz. I appreciate the jazz. But I've watched the jazz,

0:22:08.960 --> 0:22:14.280
<v Speaker 1>but it's it's an appreciation, not a entertainment vehicle. Yes, yeah,

0:22:14.400 --> 0:22:16.840
<v Speaker 1>you're not gonna go oh my god, like when you

0:22:16.840 --> 0:22:21.160
<v Speaker 1>walk calmly through a you know, art gallery. Yeah, you

0:22:21.359 --> 0:22:27.000
<v Speaker 1>just admire. You just you watch and you admire. Yes, mcclub,

0:22:27.200 --> 0:22:30.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean, how about next hour's Paul who's a better Bogdanovich?

0:22:30.520 --> 0:22:36.280
<v Speaker 1>The Jazz is um bojan or the Hawks bogdon Because

0:22:36.320 --> 0:22:38.720
<v Speaker 1>apparently the Jazz or the stories did anyone here not

0:22:38.800 --> 0:22:41.680
<v Speaker 1>know they were two different people? Because I always thought

0:22:41.680 --> 0:22:43.080
<v Speaker 1>I thought they just got traded for each other a

0:22:43.080 --> 0:22:44.960
<v Speaker 1>couple of times a week. I thought they both played

0:22:45.000 --> 0:22:48.480
<v Speaker 1>for Sacramento at a one point. I think they did.

0:22:49.080 --> 0:22:51.200
<v Speaker 1>They have the same stats too, by the way, exactly

0:22:51.280 --> 0:22:55.760
<v Speaker 1>the same points per game. Almas get a couple of

0:22:55.760 --> 0:22:59.920
<v Speaker 1>phone calls in here Christian in Utah, like Christian, congratulations

0:23:00.160 --> 0:23:11.840
<v Speaker 1>on your Utah jazz thankers. I think he. I think

0:23:11.880 --> 0:23:15.000
<v Speaker 1>he's just appreciating the show. Hey, didn't want to talk.

0:23:15.720 --> 0:23:18.600
<v Speaker 1>Can we take phone calls? We don't know if we

0:23:18.640 --> 0:23:20.320
<v Speaker 1>can take phone calls. Oh, that's a good question. We

0:23:20.320 --> 0:23:22.639
<v Speaker 1>couldn't take that one. Okay, try another. All right, how

0:23:22.640 --> 0:23:25.679
<v Speaker 1>about Jamie and North Carolinia. You want to give that

0:23:25.720 --> 0:23:28.640
<v Speaker 1>a go, because that's probably not gonna go well either.

0:23:30.400 --> 0:23:32.920
<v Speaker 1>You know, you just can't find good help anymore? Sure can't,

0:23:32.960 --> 0:23:38.200
<v Speaker 1>can you? Yeah? I thought we had good help, not anymore?

0:23:38.560 --> 0:23:40.440
<v Speaker 1>Back to the drawing board, I guess. Yeah. Well, see

0:23:40.480 --> 0:23:43.399
<v Speaker 1>if we can hire somebody, Yes, it might be for

0:23:43.440 --> 0:23:47.240
<v Speaker 1>the best. With angry jazz fans, angry Houston people, I

0:23:47.240 --> 0:23:49.480
<v Speaker 1>think there would be a lot of people angry. The

0:23:49.560 --> 0:23:55.320
<v Speaker 1>PGA tour Springs Swing lifts off in Florida today. It's

0:23:55.359 --> 0:24:01.080
<v Speaker 1>the WGC Workday championship and coverage starts this weekend at

0:24:01.080 --> 0:24:03.119
<v Speaker 1>two thirty Eastern on the NBC. You know what I

0:24:03.200 --> 0:24:07.959
<v Speaker 1>was thinking today, I should have said it yesterday. Every

0:24:08.040 --> 0:24:12.840
<v Speaker 1>player on tour should wear red today in honor of

0:24:12.880 --> 0:24:18.320
<v Speaker 1>Tiger Woods when they tee off, because I'm wondering, you know,

0:24:18.359 --> 0:24:20.720
<v Speaker 1>they want to pay tribute to him. Everybody's sending their

0:24:20.720 --> 0:24:24.159
<v Speaker 1>best wishes. How great would that be if every player

0:24:24.320 --> 0:24:29.399
<v Speaker 1>who teed up today wore red in honor of Tiger Woods.

0:24:30.400 --> 0:24:32.840
<v Speaker 1>I think it'd be great. We'll try to get to

0:24:32.920 --> 0:24:35.800
<v Speaker 1>more phone calls coming up. It's a National Chili Day,

0:24:35.840 --> 0:24:40.280
<v Speaker 1>but it's also a chowder day as well. I don't

0:24:40.280 --> 0:24:43.879
<v Speaker 1>really recognize chowder. Wow, No, I don't. You're like like

0:24:43.960 --> 0:24:48.840
<v Speaker 1>Nick Houston barbecue. Well, I can recognize chowder, but I

0:24:48.840 --> 0:24:51.840
<v Speaker 1>don't recognize it as being something great. You don't like

0:24:51.880 --> 0:24:55.399
<v Speaker 1>clam chowder? No? Is this just like acause you're in

0:24:55.440 --> 0:24:57.680
<v Speaker 1>New England and you have to be like, I don't

0:24:57.720 --> 0:25:02.080
<v Speaker 1>actually like chowder and I don't sound like that. I'm sorry.

0:25:02.119 --> 0:25:04.840
<v Speaker 1>I grew up in Cincinnati, where we have chili. We haven't.

0:25:04.880 --> 0:25:07.439
<v Speaker 1>We don't really do chowder. We have gold Star Chili

0:25:07.640 --> 0:25:10.720
<v Speaker 1>in Cincinnati but no, I don't do chowder, which is

0:25:10.800 --> 0:25:16.800
<v Speaker 1>essentially soup. Okay, but it's still called gold Star chili. No,

0:25:16.920 --> 0:25:20.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't do chowder. I'm I chili. Yeah, always good.

0:25:20.640 --> 0:25:24.040
<v Speaker 1>Chili is always good, can't go wrong. But chowder Noah,

0:25:24.400 --> 0:25:29.639
<v Speaker 1>not not in that. Am I gonna upset all the

0:25:29.720 --> 0:25:33.160
<v Speaker 1>chowder heads out there? How can you not like chowder?

0:25:33.200 --> 0:25:36.720
<v Speaker 1>How many more um like food oriented groups of people

0:25:36.760 --> 0:25:40.080
<v Speaker 1>getting upset today? Between Houston and now the Greater New

0:25:40.119 --> 0:25:43.200
<v Speaker 1>England's chowder region. I'm not worried about it. They don't

0:25:43.240 --> 0:25:45.879
<v Speaker 1>seem like a real vocal group, you know, the the

0:25:46.040 --> 0:25:50.240
<v Speaker 1>chowder group in New England. Yes, both the chili defenders

0:25:50.240 --> 0:25:53.240
<v Speaker 1>it's natural chili. They can get pretty uh saucy, especially

0:25:53.280 --> 0:25:56.480
<v Speaker 1>people in Texas. People in Texas especially don't want beans

0:25:56.480 --> 0:25:58.520
<v Speaker 1>in their chili, and to a point where they make

0:25:58.520 --> 0:25:59.919
<v Speaker 1>fun of you if you put beans in each other.

0:26:00.200 --> 0:26:03.560
<v Speaker 1>And I'm not advocating anything, I'm just presenting, okay, don't

0:26:03.560 --> 0:26:05.280
<v Speaker 1>want to get on their bad side. There's also probably

0:26:05.320 --> 0:26:07.840
<v Speaker 1>few people in Utah that despise jello. For whatever reason.

0:26:07.840 --> 0:26:09.439
<v Speaker 1>We've kind of all put them under the umbrella that

0:26:09.440 --> 0:26:12.320
<v Speaker 1>we assume everyone from Utah just loves jello and a

0:26:12.400 --> 0:26:14.800
<v Speaker 1>few could be sending us some social media, you know,

0:26:15.040 --> 0:26:16.960
<v Speaker 1>to ease up on that. And we can't assume everyone

0:26:17.000 --> 0:26:21.879
<v Speaker 1>likes it. Do they have the internet in Utah? Why? Like,

0:26:25.400 --> 0:26:27.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. The jello. Jello is like a nineteen

0:26:27.920 --> 0:26:32.320
<v Speaker 1>fifty dessert. Like jello is not a modern food. When's

0:26:32.320 --> 0:26:35.280
<v Speaker 1>the last time you had jello? Four weeks ago, our

0:26:35.359 --> 0:26:37.040
<v Speaker 1>kids wanted jello. We made it, We put some cool

0:26:37.119 --> 0:26:39.040
<v Speaker 1>up on top. Jed was a millionaire. Yeah, but if

0:26:39.080 --> 0:26:41.360
<v Speaker 1>you're a grown up and your kids are grown up,

0:26:41.480 --> 0:26:45.560
<v Speaker 1>you're not having jello. It's a refreshing It's like going

0:26:45.600 --> 0:26:48.240
<v Speaker 1>back to your past. Like when I watch that commercial

0:26:48.280 --> 0:26:50.240
<v Speaker 1>where the guy leaves the jello on top of his

0:26:50.359 --> 0:26:55.080
<v Speaker 1>car that insurance company or whatever, Geico. Oh yeah, I

0:26:55.119 --> 0:26:57.640
<v Speaker 1>know that one. Yeah, there's a goldfish on the top

0:26:57.680 --> 0:27:01.240
<v Speaker 1>of another cold fish. Like I I wouldn't have any

0:27:01.240 --> 0:27:03.399
<v Speaker 1>problem if the jello fell off the back of the

0:27:03.480 --> 0:27:05.639
<v Speaker 1>car there, yes, time. But if you're on a liquid

0:27:05.640 --> 0:27:08.160
<v Speaker 1>diet though, it's really that broth and you know, maybe

0:27:08.240 --> 0:27:11.119
<v Speaker 1>some gingerbell, the jello becomes a significant part of the diet.

0:27:11.800 --> 0:27:13.600
<v Speaker 1>I think if I would, you know, if you're in

0:27:13.600 --> 0:27:16.720
<v Speaker 1>the hospital. Maybe you've had jello, but I can't imagine

0:27:16.960 --> 0:27:19.639
<v Speaker 1>that you go, you know what, I'm really jones in

0:27:19.760 --> 0:27:22.440
<v Speaker 1>for some jello pre colonoscopy. Jello is a must. That's

0:27:22.440 --> 0:27:25.280
<v Speaker 1>pretty much your last meal before going through this. Tim

0:27:25.359 --> 0:27:28.080
<v Speaker 1>Legler from the Mother's Ship Will Jonas coming up next down.

0:27:28.240 --> 0:27:34.480
<v Speaker 1>We'll get his thoughts on the Utah And should the

0:27:34.560 --> 0:27:37.720
<v Speaker 1>Laker fans be nervous about what's going on? I don't

0:27:37.760 --> 0:27:39.680
<v Speaker 1>know if there's any other real news now that Devin

0:27:39.720 --> 0:27:42.640
<v Speaker 1>Booker is named to the All Star Team, Are there

0:27:42.640 --> 0:27:46.240
<v Speaker 1>any other headlines going on with the NBA? Yeah, McLevin.

0:27:46.320 --> 0:27:48.679
<v Speaker 1>I saw a highlight last night where it was Danielle

0:27:48.720 --> 0:27:52.840
<v Speaker 1>Gallinari was shooting logo threes. Yeah, like fifteen feet behind

0:27:52.840 --> 0:27:54.480
<v Speaker 1>the line. Is that the new thing in the NBA?

0:27:54.600 --> 0:27:56.320
<v Speaker 1>That the you can't shoot the three, you have to

0:27:56.320 --> 0:27:59.520
<v Speaker 1>be even farther back. I was watching last night. I

0:27:59.560 --> 0:28:05.119
<v Speaker 1>don't even know the game, but you had somebody just

0:28:06.240 --> 0:28:08.679
<v Speaker 1>it was just a normal coming down and setting up

0:28:08.720 --> 0:28:11.720
<v Speaker 1>the offense, and they took a three from about thirty

0:28:11.720 --> 0:28:14.000
<v Speaker 1>five feet away and I went, how could that be

0:28:14.160 --> 0:28:18.359
<v Speaker 1>the design or? And it's not something like it was

0:28:20.840 --> 0:28:23.320
<v Speaker 1>Trey Young where you go, hey, you got the green

0:28:23.359 --> 0:28:25.960
<v Speaker 1>light or Steph Curry, it was just like, what are

0:28:26.000 --> 0:28:29.960
<v Speaker 1>you doing? Like, why are that's the shot you could

0:28:30.000 --> 0:28:33.399
<v Speaker 1>That's the best shot you could get. Did it go in? No? No?

0:28:34.680 --> 0:28:39.680
<v Speaker 1>But it feels like now because it's Steph Curry, I

0:28:39.720 --> 0:28:42.120
<v Speaker 1>can credit Steph Curry, but I got to give him

0:28:42.120 --> 0:28:44.840
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of blink. It's like, and I'll make

0:28:44.880 --> 0:28:48.640
<v Speaker 1>it personal. It's it's similar to when Oberman and myself

0:28:48.760 --> 0:28:52.480
<v Speaker 1>did highlights on Sports Center. We got credit because we

0:28:52.560 --> 0:28:57.520
<v Speaker 1>did it differently, but we deserve blame because everybody then

0:28:57.760 --> 0:29:01.560
<v Speaker 1>wanted to do highlights that way. You watch Steph Curry,

0:29:02.000 --> 0:29:05.080
<v Speaker 1>everybody goes, he's not a big guy and he's shooting

0:29:05.120 --> 0:29:09.440
<v Speaker 1>that far. Now we want to do it. The most

0:29:09.560 --> 0:29:17.120
<v Speaker 1>influential basketball player when it comes to style, the ability

0:29:17.160 --> 0:29:20.360
<v Speaker 1>for people who are regular people, kids who know that

0:29:20.400 --> 0:29:22.800
<v Speaker 1>they're not going to play maybe even high school, they

0:29:22.840 --> 0:29:25.920
<v Speaker 1>all think they can be Steph Curry. There's no other

0:29:25.960 --> 0:29:29.480
<v Speaker 1>player that's played where you have all of us going,

0:29:29.920 --> 0:29:32.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I want to play like Jordan. I know

0:29:32.720 --> 0:29:35.880
<v Speaker 1>I can't play like Jordan. Can I shoot where Steph

0:29:35.920 --> 0:29:39.280
<v Speaker 1>Curry is? When I was younger, not that I could

0:29:39.280 --> 0:29:42.520
<v Speaker 1>make them, but I could shoot there. Every kid now,

0:29:42.800 --> 0:29:46.960
<v Speaker 1>if you watch a pickup game, there is nothing that's

0:29:46.960 --> 0:29:50.040
<v Speaker 1>out of their range in their minds and it's crazy.

0:29:50.960 --> 0:29:54.680
<v Speaker 1>But even college basketball, it's tough to watch college basketball

0:29:54.720 --> 0:29:59.760
<v Speaker 1>because there are guys. Most guys can't shoot. It feels like,

0:30:00.120 --> 0:30:02.880
<v Speaker 1>but they think they can shoot, and that doesn't stop

0:30:02.920 --> 0:30:06.560
<v Speaker 1>them from shooting. And it feels like the best play

0:30:06.640 --> 0:30:11.720
<v Speaker 1>drawn up is I don't know, okay, get three. Yeah, boy,

0:30:12.240 --> 0:30:14.760
<v Speaker 1>I was watching Marquette in North Carolina last night and

0:30:14.760 --> 0:30:16.480
<v Speaker 1>it was it was kind of refreshing because it was

0:30:16.520 --> 0:30:19.080
<v Speaker 1>the opposite. North Carolina was doing this full court press.

0:30:19.120 --> 0:30:21.120
<v Speaker 1>Even though they lost, it was it was really fantastic

0:30:21.160 --> 0:30:23.440
<v Speaker 1>to see a college team because nobody in the pros

0:30:23.520 --> 0:30:26.360
<v Speaker 1>ever does a full court press ever. But North Carolina

0:30:26.400 --> 0:30:28.040
<v Speaker 1>was doing this great full court press and it was

0:30:28.240 --> 0:30:31.120
<v Speaker 1>there hassling Marquette and there was pick and roll basketball

0:30:31.280 --> 0:30:34.160
<v Speaker 1>and yeah, but Carolina got blown out right. I'm just

0:30:34.160 --> 0:30:35.800
<v Speaker 1>saying from an aesthetics of watching the game, I was

0:30:35.840 --> 0:30:40.360
<v Speaker 1>appreciating the context. Yeah, that's a devastating loss for North

0:30:40.360 --> 0:30:43.160
<v Speaker 1>Carolina because I don't know if they're going to get

0:30:43.160 --> 0:30:48.120
<v Speaker 1>in the tournament. But Marquette looked great. But yeah, I

0:30:48.160 --> 0:30:51.240
<v Speaker 1>watched that. It was like forty five to twenty two,

0:30:51.280 --> 0:30:54.600
<v Speaker 1>and I went, woo, yes, McLevin, But you don't stand

0:30:54.640 --> 0:30:57.280
<v Speaker 1>a chance in college basketball without the three, right, Isn't

0:30:57.320 --> 0:30:59.560
<v Speaker 1>that how you win because of the you know, the

0:30:59.600 --> 0:31:01.760
<v Speaker 1>science of the game. Well, I can go back to

0:31:01.840 --> 0:31:07.240
<v Speaker 1>Paul west Head at Loyal La Merrymount and Rick Pettino

0:31:07.280 --> 0:31:11.120
<v Speaker 1>at Providence. Those are two of the coaches. And I'm

0:31:11.120 --> 0:31:14.560
<v Speaker 1>sure I'm leaving out somebody, but Pettino had a team

0:31:15.120 --> 0:31:18.080
<v Speaker 1>with Billy Donovan as one of his star players, and

0:31:18.120 --> 0:31:20.920
<v Speaker 1>they weren't. He didn't have great players. He probably didn't

0:31:20.960 --> 0:31:23.440
<v Speaker 1>have very good players. He had some good players, but

0:31:23.520 --> 0:31:26.040
<v Speaker 1>he had a philosophy of shooting the three. And we

0:31:26.160 --> 0:31:29.480
<v Speaker 1>know what Paul Westead did with Loyal La Merrymount. They

0:31:29.480 --> 0:31:33.160
<v Speaker 1>shot the three, but I mean, there's was just we

0:31:33.200 --> 0:31:36.360
<v Speaker 1>want to we want to get you running, we want

0:31:36.360 --> 0:31:40.200
<v Speaker 1>to make this high scoring in what Westead did. But

0:31:40.640 --> 0:31:45.720
<v Speaker 1>Rick Pettino back at Providence, that was an amazing tournament

0:31:45.800 --> 0:31:49.520
<v Speaker 1>run and they shot the three. But it feels like,

0:31:50.600 --> 0:31:53.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, college basketball moved the three back. I'm wondering

0:31:53.760 --> 0:31:57.120
<v Speaker 1>if they get to the NBA three if like it's

0:31:57.120 --> 0:31:59.720
<v Speaker 1>too much of a good thing. I'd like to see

0:31:59.760 --> 0:32:02.680
<v Speaker 1>good shooters, but I don't like to see bad shooters.

0:32:03.160 --> 0:32:08.160
<v Speaker 1>And it's not like you had bad dunkers, right, you know,

0:32:08.200 --> 0:32:10.400
<v Speaker 1>it's not like, hey, I'm gonna try to dunk like

0:32:10.480 --> 0:32:13.160
<v Speaker 1>John Stockton didn't go I guess I got to try

0:32:13.200 --> 0:32:17.000
<v Speaker 1>to dunk. Here, you get bad three point shooters. And

0:32:17.160 --> 0:32:20.160
<v Speaker 1>that's the problem with you know, watching a lot of

0:32:20.200 --> 0:32:24.400
<v Speaker 1>this is certainly in college because you're going, gosh, how

0:32:24.440 --> 0:32:28.120
<v Speaker 1>about inside mid range jumper, pick and roll. It's like

0:32:28.240 --> 0:32:34.000
<v Speaker 1>something little ball movement. It's just five guys on the perimeter. Yeah.

0:32:34.400 --> 0:32:36.760
<v Speaker 1>College basketball brought in the three point line in the

0:32:36.760 --> 0:32:39.760
<v Speaker 1>eighty six eighty seventh season. Indiana won the title that

0:32:39.840 --> 0:32:42.240
<v Speaker 1>year and Steve Alford became a star, and it was

0:32:42.360 --> 0:32:44.920
<v Speaker 1>it was new at the time. He averaged six three

0:32:44.920 --> 0:32:47.040
<v Speaker 1>point attempts per game, which was by far the most

0:32:47.040 --> 0:32:50.120
<v Speaker 1>in the country. He shot fifty three percent from three.

0:32:50.440 --> 0:32:52.000
<v Speaker 1>He ended up being like one of the players of

0:32:52.040 --> 0:32:54.040
<v Speaker 1>the year. They won the title, and that was the

0:32:54.080 --> 0:32:56.800
<v Speaker 1>direct effect of the three point line that year. And

0:32:56.880 --> 0:33:01.880
<v Speaker 1>I wonder if Steve Alford was playing now, you'd have

0:33:01.920 --> 0:33:04.320
<v Speaker 1>to have him shoot. And this is Bob Knight. You know,

0:33:04.400 --> 0:33:06.680
<v Speaker 1>Bob Knight doesn't strike me as I'm going to embrace

0:33:06.720 --> 0:33:09.680
<v Speaker 1>the three. It's like Greg Popovich. You know, Popovitch still

0:33:09.720 --> 0:33:12.800
<v Speaker 1>hasn't embraced the three. But you give Steve Alford the

0:33:12.800 --> 0:33:16.200
<v Speaker 1>green light, and you know he was a knockdown shooter.

0:33:17.560 --> 0:33:19.800
<v Speaker 1>But even with Larry Bird, you know, you see those

0:33:19.880 --> 0:33:23.800
<v Speaker 1>numbers people. You know, at that time, we didn't think

0:33:23.920 --> 0:33:28.320
<v Speaker 1>that was smart basketball, the three point shot or Bird

0:33:28.360 --> 0:33:33.640
<v Speaker 1>would have taken ten a game. You know, Dennis Scott,

0:33:34.320 --> 0:33:38.280
<v Speaker 1>like those guys, Dell Curry, they would have taken ten

0:33:38.320 --> 0:33:40.840
<v Speaker 1>a game. At least you would want them too because

0:33:40.920 --> 0:33:45.880
<v Speaker 1>they were great shooters. And now you got guys who

0:33:45.880 --> 0:33:50.160
<v Speaker 1>aren't good shooters and they're taking threes. We'll take a break.

0:33:51.320 --> 0:33:53.560
<v Speaker 1>We'll try to get phone calls here. Coming out. We'll

0:33:53.640 --> 0:33:55.440
<v Speaker 1>check in with Tim Legler. Be good to visit with

0:33:55.560 --> 0:33:58.200
<v Speaker 1>Legs on loan from the Mother's Ship. And we're back

0:33:58.240 --> 0:34:00.320
<v Speaker 1>after this and The Dan Patrick Show. Thanks for listening

0:34:00.360 --> 0:34:02.720
<v Speaker 1>to The Dan Patrick Show podcast. Be sure to catch

0:34:02.800 --> 0:34:05.680
<v Speaker 1>us live every weekday morning nine until noon eastern six

0:34:05.760 --> 0:34:08.480
<v Speaker 1>to nine Pacific on Fox Sports Radio, and you can

0:34:08.480 --> 0:34:12.600
<v Speaker 1>find us on the iHeartRadio app at FSR or stream

0:34:12.680 --> 0:34:15.400
<v Speaker 1>us live on the Peacock app. Nobody thinks the NFL

0:34:15.520 --> 0:34:18.960
<v Speaker 1>Scouting Combine is perfect At this point, Most smart football

0:34:19.000 --> 0:34:22.080
<v Speaker 1>fans and hopefully the teams realize that working out in

0:34:22.120 --> 0:34:25.680
<v Speaker 1>shorts doesn't exactly translate directly to the field. But this year,

0:34:25.760 --> 0:34:28.720
<v Speaker 1>teams they're going to miss out on the annual event,

0:34:29.080 --> 0:34:31.480
<v Speaker 1>and they're going to miss out more than you'd think. Normally,

0:34:31.480 --> 0:34:33.920
<v Speaker 1>the on field workouts would be starting today and the

0:34:34.000 --> 0:34:37.080
<v Speaker 1>league canceled the combine this year. Now teams have to

0:34:37.120 --> 0:34:41.239
<v Speaker 1>gather as much information as they can remotely. It's going

0:34:41.280 --> 0:34:44.040
<v Speaker 1>to be difficult to do that. And what happens at

0:34:44.040 --> 0:34:47.160
<v Speaker 1>the combine, I know we see the forty yard dash

0:34:47.160 --> 0:34:49.440
<v Speaker 1>in the cone drill and how many times can you

0:34:49.760 --> 0:34:53.720
<v Speaker 1>bench to twenty five? The important parts, from what I'm told,

0:34:54.600 --> 0:34:57.799
<v Speaker 1>is the medical being able to go over the medicals

0:34:58.000 --> 0:35:01.080
<v Speaker 1>and being able to have especial a quarterback stand in

0:35:01.080 --> 0:35:03.880
<v Speaker 1>front of the whiteboard in diagram plays in real time.

0:35:04.200 --> 0:35:05.960
<v Speaker 1>That's what they want to know, that's what they want

0:35:05.960 --> 0:35:10.680
<v Speaker 1>to see. Scouting staffs, they're getting limited information, they know

0:35:10.800 --> 0:35:13.440
<v Speaker 1>less about the prospects, and they'll be able to meet

0:35:13.560 --> 0:35:16.200
<v Speaker 1>fewer of them in person, so it's going to be

0:35:16.239 --> 0:35:18.759
<v Speaker 1>a real test when it comes to draft day. The

0:35:18.840 --> 0:35:21.600
<v Speaker 1>draft is already a crapshoot, even the top five picks

0:35:21.640 --> 0:35:24.719
<v Speaker 1>far from guarantees, and then you add in the unusual

0:35:24.760 --> 0:35:27.880
<v Speaker 1>elements of the pandemic and this might be one of

0:35:27.920 --> 0:35:31.040
<v Speaker 1>the stranger drafts in NFL history. I think it's going

0:35:31.080 --> 0:35:33.200
<v Speaker 1>to be top heavy with quarterbacks, or at least it

0:35:33.239 --> 0:35:36.520
<v Speaker 1>feels that way right now. There'll probably be a few

0:35:36.560 --> 0:35:39.520
<v Speaker 1>trades in here as well in the first round, but

0:35:39.640 --> 0:35:42.520
<v Speaker 1>there's always one outlier. There's always a team where you go,

0:35:43.280 --> 0:35:46.600
<v Speaker 1>I didn't see that one coming. It feels like every

0:35:46.680 --> 0:35:50.000
<v Speaker 1>year somebody surprises you. They fell in love with somebody,

0:35:50.040 --> 0:35:52.760
<v Speaker 1>They went up and got that guy, and that's probably

0:35:52.760 --> 0:35:55.000
<v Speaker 1>going to be the case this year. Is somebody going

0:35:55.040 --> 0:35:58.680
<v Speaker 1>to fall in love with somebody at number two? Can

0:35:58.800 --> 0:36:02.480
<v Speaker 1>you offer a page that the Jacksonville Jaguars would go?

0:36:03.640 --> 0:36:08.439
<v Speaker 1>Let me think about that. Could you offer four first

0:36:08.520 --> 0:36:12.640
<v Speaker 1>round draft picks and a player would Jacksonville be interested in? Then?

0:36:13.800 --> 0:36:16.400
<v Speaker 1>Now I wouldn't. I would say I want Trevor Lawrence.

0:36:16.800 --> 0:36:19.799
<v Speaker 1>And that's why urban Meyer took this job. If he

0:36:19.880 --> 0:36:21.520
<v Speaker 1>had the number two pick in the draft. I don't

0:36:21.560 --> 0:36:23.920
<v Speaker 1>think he takes this job now. I don't know if

0:36:23.960 --> 0:36:26.799
<v Speaker 1>he's acknowledged that. I don't know if he would acknowledge that.

0:36:27.440 --> 0:36:30.000
<v Speaker 1>But that's a question I would ask him. If you

0:36:30.000 --> 0:36:32.160
<v Speaker 1>didn't have the number one pick, would you have taken

0:36:32.200 --> 0:36:38.920
<v Speaker 1>this job? Because Trevor gives you time. You got the

0:36:39.320 --> 0:36:43.840
<v Speaker 1>financial aspect of this, the fans aspect of this. Nobody's

0:36:43.880 --> 0:36:46.399
<v Speaker 1>saying Jacksonville is gonna win in year one or year two.

0:36:46.520 --> 0:36:49.880
<v Speaker 1>Now year three, you're going to ramp up the pressure.

0:36:50.560 --> 0:36:53.000
<v Speaker 1>Now urban Meyer is going to put enough pressure on

0:36:53.080 --> 0:36:55.560
<v Speaker 1>himself that it doesn't matter what happens in year three

0:36:55.640 --> 0:37:01.200
<v Speaker 1>with outside pressure. But going into this draft, Davante Smith,

0:37:02.000 --> 0:37:05.560
<v Speaker 1>you still have questions about him. Teams have questions about him.

0:37:05.920 --> 0:37:08.759
<v Speaker 1>Is Jamar Chase, the LSU wide receiver who sat out

0:37:08.880 --> 0:37:13.560
<v Speaker 1>last year a better pro prospect? Davante Smith was wonderful

0:37:13.600 --> 0:37:17.680
<v Speaker 1>in college. Jamar Chase could be a better pro prospect

0:37:18.080 --> 0:37:21.120
<v Speaker 1>out of LSU. What do you do if you're the Jets?

0:37:21.920 --> 0:37:24.640
<v Speaker 1>Is Zach Wilson a lateral move for you? If you

0:37:24.719 --> 0:37:27.200
<v Speaker 1>bring him in? Does it make more sense to keep

0:37:27.239 --> 0:37:31.480
<v Speaker 1>Sam Darnold trying for a year, and then maybe you

0:37:31.560 --> 0:37:34.040
<v Speaker 1>get some draft picks here where you can build up

0:37:34.040 --> 0:37:38.680
<v Speaker 1>your roster. Then you have the Atlanta Falcons. Do the

0:37:38.719 --> 0:37:41.600
<v Speaker 1>Falcons go all in on a quarterback here? They got

0:37:41.600 --> 0:37:45.239
<v Speaker 1>the fourth pick overall? How bad do you want? Zach

0:37:45.320 --> 0:37:50.080
<v Speaker 1>Wilson mac Jones is moving up. How he's moving up,

0:37:50.280 --> 0:37:52.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm not quite sure because he hasn't played a football

0:37:52.760 --> 0:37:56.239
<v Speaker 1>game in a couple of months, but he's moving up now.

0:37:56.280 --> 0:38:01.680
<v Speaker 1>He makes all the throws. Okay, the tape doesn't lie.

0:38:01.800 --> 0:38:03.960
<v Speaker 1>I always love, you know, when these guys look at

0:38:04.040 --> 0:38:06.920
<v Speaker 1>their pro day or there's the combine and then all

0:38:06.920 --> 0:38:10.680
<v Speaker 1>of a sudden they outsmart themselves. You know, I go

0:38:10.760 --> 0:38:17.040
<v Speaker 1>back Teddy Bridgewater Lamar Jackson weren't quite sure. I don't know.

0:38:17.920 --> 0:38:22.520
<v Speaker 1>Teddy Bridgewater was tough. Now, obviously he went through the

0:38:22.560 --> 0:38:27.080
<v Speaker 1>devastating knee injury. Lamar Jackson did what you wanted him

0:38:27.080 --> 0:38:30.000
<v Speaker 1>to do. In college. He dominated. He was a highlight.

0:38:30.480 --> 0:38:33.879
<v Speaker 1>He could run, he could pass, and can he can

0:38:33.880 --> 0:38:37.600
<v Speaker 1>he throw outside the numbers? Can he throw somebody open?

0:38:37.840 --> 0:38:40.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I just know with what I saw

0:38:40.120 --> 0:38:45.160
<v Speaker 1>at Louisville, he was pretty damn good. Now, I don't

0:38:45.160 --> 0:38:49.400
<v Speaker 1>know what somebody saw with Mitchell Trubisky. I don't know

0:38:49.440 --> 0:38:53.080
<v Speaker 1>what somebody saw with Daniel Jones. Where they went we

0:38:53.239 --> 0:38:57.000
<v Speaker 1>have to have that guy, Zach Wilson. I watched when

0:38:57.040 --> 0:38:59.719
<v Speaker 1>he was really good and I watched when he was

0:39:00.120 --> 0:39:04.480
<v Speaker 1>really bad against Coastal Carolina. I'm guessing he's somewhere in

0:39:04.520 --> 0:39:08.640
<v Speaker 1>between right now. Is that worth? The number two pick

0:39:08.680 --> 0:39:11.480
<v Speaker 1>in the draft, got a big arm. He's been compared

0:39:11.560 --> 0:39:18.040
<v Speaker 1>to Aaron Rodgers as far as talent goes. But Mac Jones,

0:39:18.120 --> 0:39:21.160
<v Speaker 1>I have no idea. Do I think he throws a

0:39:21.200 --> 0:39:25.640
<v Speaker 1>better football than twa Yes, I do, but I've seen

0:39:25.680 --> 0:39:29.360
<v Speaker 1>it look easy for Dwayne Haskins, and it's not easy

0:39:29.400 --> 0:39:33.440
<v Speaker 1>when you get to the pros, and Dwayne Haskins struggled.

0:39:34.719 --> 0:39:38.640
<v Speaker 1>But mac Jones has a great offensive line, great running back,

0:39:38.840 --> 0:39:41.799
<v Speaker 1>great targets, and one of the great coaches in the

0:39:41.840 --> 0:39:46.600
<v Speaker 1>history of the sport. Other than that, that's the hard part.

0:39:46.840 --> 0:39:50.040
<v Speaker 1>Now I don't even get to be around him. And

0:39:50.080 --> 0:39:52.200
<v Speaker 1>then I got to figure out is he a top

0:39:52.239 --> 0:39:55.279
<v Speaker 1>ten quarterback? Because I think he's going to end up

0:39:55.280 --> 0:39:58.680
<v Speaker 1>being in the top ten. And this goes back to

0:39:58.719 --> 0:40:01.440
<v Speaker 1>a couple of weeks ago. I have a friend who's

0:40:01.440 --> 0:40:04.120
<v Speaker 1>a scout. And he said, hey, mac Jones is moving up.

0:40:04.160 --> 0:40:08.160
<v Speaker 1>I said, he hadn't played. He goes, but we're getting information. Now.

0:40:08.640 --> 0:40:10.799
<v Speaker 1>That's where you reach out to Saban, That's where you

0:40:10.880 --> 0:40:14.160
<v Speaker 1>reach out to defensive coordinators for other college teams, like

0:40:14.200 --> 0:40:17.359
<v Speaker 1>they have this whole process here. And I said, and

0:40:17.400 --> 0:40:19.359
<v Speaker 1>so I said it on the air, I said, mac

0:40:19.440 --> 0:40:22.959
<v Speaker 1>Jones is moving up. He was a late first round

0:40:23.000 --> 0:40:28.000
<v Speaker 1>pick and here he comes. Then it was well, maybe

0:40:28.000 --> 0:40:31.279
<v Speaker 1>fifteen the Patriots take him. Now we're talking top ten

0:40:31.360 --> 0:40:33.960
<v Speaker 1>for mac Jones. I don't know how good he is.

0:40:35.640 --> 0:40:40.800
<v Speaker 1>Kyle Trask, I don't know how good he is justin fields,

0:40:40.960 --> 0:40:44.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how good he is. It's going to

0:40:44.280 --> 0:40:47.320
<v Speaker 1>be even harder this year when it comes to draft picks.

0:40:48.080 --> 0:40:52.600
<v Speaker 1>And without the Combine. You know, we've seen teams with

0:40:52.880 --> 0:40:55.400
<v Speaker 1>when they're allowed to be around players, when they can

0:40:55.440 --> 0:40:57.799
<v Speaker 1>go to the Combine, go to their pro day, they

0:40:57.800 --> 0:41:01.239
<v Speaker 1>have everything there for them, and they still with and

0:41:01.320 --> 0:41:03.560
<v Speaker 1>I think you're going to see And that's why I

0:41:03.560 --> 0:41:07.240
<v Speaker 1>don't understand what the Texans are doing, because if Houston

0:41:07.360 --> 0:41:11.000
<v Speaker 1>knows this is a dead end street with DeShawn Watson,

0:41:11.640 --> 0:41:14.080
<v Speaker 1>that we know it, we don't want to admit it,

0:41:15.400 --> 0:41:19.120
<v Speaker 1>but we know it. Then you have to say, at

0:41:19.200 --> 0:41:22.160
<v Speaker 1>what point do we go. The timing is right to

0:41:22.360 --> 0:41:26.560
<v Speaker 1>just say we've got a tagsail. Everybody, come in, tell

0:41:26.640 --> 0:41:29.440
<v Speaker 1>us what you want to offer for DeShawn Watson, because

0:41:30.560 --> 0:41:33.879
<v Speaker 1>you know, to exacerbate the problem, Deshaun Watson can then

0:41:33.920 --> 0:41:36.279
<v Speaker 1>say to the Texans that's a good deal for you,

0:41:36.440 --> 0:41:38.719
<v Speaker 1>that's not a good deal for me, because he can

0:41:38.800 --> 0:41:41.560
<v Speaker 1>be to a trade, but I still want to know

0:41:41.640 --> 0:41:44.759
<v Speaker 1>what you what are you willing to give up? And

0:41:45.040 --> 0:41:47.280
<v Speaker 1>I would just sit down with him and say, look, DeShawn,

0:41:47.800 --> 0:41:50.480
<v Speaker 1>if you don't want to be here, tell us the

0:41:50.520 --> 0:41:55.080
<v Speaker 1>teams that you would go to. Now if you exhaust

0:41:55.200 --> 0:41:57.960
<v Speaker 1>all the avenues and we say, you know what, you

0:41:58.000 --> 0:42:00.160
<v Speaker 1>don't want to be here because of ownership or or

0:42:00.160 --> 0:42:03.879
<v Speaker 1>the front office or hiring, you know, practices that help

0:42:03.960 --> 0:42:07.920
<v Speaker 1>us trade you. That that would be Mike, because I

0:42:07.920 --> 0:42:11.279
<v Speaker 1>don't want to have the market dry up from the

0:42:11.320 --> 0:42:14.160
<v Speaker 1>standpoint of maybe I lose two teams that would be

0:42:14.200 --> 0:42:17.000
<v Speaker 1>interested because they're gonna go, well, all right, let's go

0:42:17.040 --> 0:42:19.800
<v Speaker 1>into the draft, or let's see if we can trade,

0:42:20.160 --> 0:42:23.480
<v Speaker 1>Let's see if we can get Teddy Bridgewater Jacoby Brissette.

0:42:23.760 --> 0:42:27.280
<v Speaker 1>Let's see if we can get Marcus Mariota, because teams

0:42:27.280 --> 0:42:29.200
<v Speaker 1>are gonna go, all right, we got to get somebody

0:42:29.200 --> 0:42:31.120
<v Speaker 1>for next year. And then you're gonna go into the

0:42:31.160 --> 0:42:35.840
<v Speaker 1>draft where you're gonna have probably five quarterbacks in the

0:42:35.840 --> 0:42:40.920
<v Speaker 1>first round and four in the top ten twelve picks.

0:42:42.120 --> 0:42:45.960
<v Speaker 1>That's where if I'm the Texans, take advantage. Now, get

0:42:45.960 --> 0:42:49.200
<v Speaker 1>in front of people and then see what everybody's willing

0:42:49.239 --> 0:42:52.200
<v Speaker 1>to offer, because I think what you're gonna do is

0:42:53.640 --> 0:42:56.640
<v Speaker 1>you're going to turn off some teams and they're gonna go, Okay,

0:42:56.760 --> 0:43:00.520
<v Speaker 1>let's just do our due diligence on this player, this

0:43:00.680 --> 0:43:05.200
<v Speaker 1>draft pick, trade potential, those kind of things. That's what's surprising.

0:43:06.200 --> 0:43:08.839
<v Speaker 1>Final hour coming up, we'll talk to Tim lager Leg

0:43:09.400 --> 0:43:13.080
<v Speaker 1>from the Mother's Ship on the struggles of the La Lakers.

0:43:13.120 --> 0:43:16.080
<v Speaker 1>Final Hour coming up. Close out the second hour with

0:43:16.400 --> 0:43:19.040
<v Speaker 1>Rock Auto. Go to rockauto dot com all the parts

0:43:19.040 --> 0:43:22.200
<v Speaker 1>your car truck will ever need. Rockauto dot Com was

0:43:22.239 --> 0:43:25.640
<v Speaker 1>founded back in nineteen ninety nine, but founded by basically

0:43:25.640 --> 0:43:29.200
<v Speaker 1>automotive engineers. It's a family run business two goals in mind.

0:43:29.400 --> 0:43:31.319
<v Speaker 1>They want to give you direct access to all the

0:43:31.360 --> 0:43:34.319
<v Speaker 1>parts information hidden in the computers and catalogs behind the

0:43:34.320 --> 0:43:38.080
<v Speaker 1>parts store counter. And second they want to offer reliably

0:43:38.239 --> 0:43:42.440
<v Speaker 1>low prices. Go figure rockauto dot com correct parts for

0:43:42.520 --> 0:43:45.440
<v Speaker 1>both old and new cars. Because you can't just pour

0:43:45.560 --> 0:43:49.200
<v Speaker 1>TENW thirty oil into just about any engine you like.

0:43:49.440 --> 0:43:53.000
<v Speaker 1>Over the last thirty years, rockauto dot com specific oil,

0:43:53.040 --> 0:43:56.680
<v Speaker 1>transmission fluid, and a freeze other chemicals your car must have,

0:43:56.840 --> 0:43:59.720
<v Speaker 1>so don't waste time, don't waste money hunting for parts,

0:43:59.760 --> 0:44:02.520
<v Speaker 1>phone driving, waiting and lines. Go to rockauto dot com

0:44:02.560 --> 0:44:04.359
<v Speaker 1>today and make sure you tell them we send you.

0:44:04.480 --> 0:44:06.439
<v Speaker 1>All you do is write Dan Patrick and the how

0:44:06.440 --> 0:44:08.440
<v Speaker 1>did you hear about us? Box so that they know

0:44:08.560 --> 0:44:11.080
<v Speaker 1>we sent you all the parts your car or truck

0:44:11.120 --> 0:44:14.759
<v Speaker 1>whateverned rockoto dot com, rockauto dot com. Good luck,