WEBVTT - How Might Universal Basic Income Work?

0:00:01.920 --> 0:00:07.120
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to brain Stuff production of iHeart Radio, Hey brain Stuff,

0:00:07.160 --> 0:00:11.440
<v Speaker 1>Lauren Vogebam. Here near the end of Dr Martin Luther

0:00:11.520 --> 0:00:15.240
<v Speaker 1>King Jr's life, he turned his attention to fighting poverty.

0:00:15.880 --> 0:00:18.720
<v Speaker 1>He wrote, and where do we go from here? Chaos

0:00:18.800 --> 0:00:22.760
<v Speaker 1>or community quote, The simplest approach will prove to be

0:00:22.800 --> 0:00:26.239
<v Speaker 1>the most effective. The solution to poverty is to abolish

0:00:26.239 --> 0:00:31.200
<v Speaker 1>it directly by a now widely discussed measure, the guaranteed income.

0:00:32.800 --> 0:00:35.880
<v Speaker 1>Over half a century later, one in eight Americans, thirty

0:00:35.920 --> 0:00:39.000
<v Speaker 1>eight million people are still living below the poverty line,

0:00:39.040 --> 0:00:43.040
<v Speaker 1>according to the Census Bureau. Millions more jobs are threatened

0:00:43.040 --> 0:00:47.320
<v Speaker 1>by automation and artificial intelligence. Yet mL ka's notion of

0:00:47.360 --> 0:00:51.360
<v Speaker 1>guaranteed income of writing a monthly check to every American adult,

0:00:51.479 --> 0:00:55.520
<v Speaker 1>no questions asked, remains a radical idea in many economic

0:00:55.560 --> 0:01:00.080
<v Speaker 1>and political circles. We spoke with Stacia Martin West, a

0:01:00.080 --> 0:01:02.600
<v Speaker 1>professor of social work at the University of Tennessee and

0:01:02.720 --> 0:01:06.160
<v Speaker 1>co principal investigator with Amy Castor Baker of the University

0:01:06.200 --> 0:01:10.880
<v Speaker 1>of Pennsylvania of the Stockton Economic Power Demonstration or SEED,

0:01:11.520 --> 0:01:15.400
<v Speaker 1>one of the only active programs testing guaranteed income, also

0:01:15.440 --> 0:01:20.319
<v Speaker 1>known as universal basic income on real Americans under the

0:01:20.400 --> 0:01:24.479
<v Speaker 1>SEED program, and twenty five residents of Stockton, California were

0:01:24.480 --> 0:01:27.160
<v Speaker 1>given a guaranteed income of five hundred dollars a month

0:01:27.240 --> 0:01:30.760
<v Speaker 1>for eighteen months to see how this cash payment affected

0:01:30.800 --> 0:01:34.600
<v Speaker 1>their lives. Researchers hoped to release SEEDS first round of

0:01:34.640 --> 0:01:41.240
<v Speaker 1>findings in March. As Martin West explains, universal basic income

0:01:41.400 --> 0:01:45.600
<v Speaker 1>holds tremendous promise for alleviating not only the financial burden

0:01:45.640 --> 0:01:49.120
<v Speaker 1>of poverty, but also the damaging ripple effects of economic

0:01:49.160 --> 0:01:53.280
<v Speaker 1>and security on health and family. Yet she admits that

0:01:53.360 --> 0:01:56.880
<v Speaker 1>the very idea of a federal program paying poor Americans

0:01:56.960 --> 0:02:00.560
<v Speaker 1>hundreds or even thousands of dollars a month faces tremendous

0:02:00.560 --> 0:02:04.000
<v Speaker 1>political opposition, not only for its cost, but because of

0:02:04.040 --> 0:02:08.520
<v Speaker 1>the pervasive, if unproven belief that free government handouts discourage

0:02:08.560 --> 0:02:13.639
<v Speaker 1>people from working and foster dependence on the state if

0:02:13.680 --> 0:02:16.640
<v Speaker 1>you're poor. In the United States, there already exists a

0:02:16.760 --> 0:02:20.640
<v Speaker 1>safety net of both state and federal programs designed to

0:02:20.720 --> 0:02:24.640
<v Speaker 1>help struggling individuals and families, but all of those programs

0:02:24.680 --> 0:02:28.560
<v Speaker 1>are means tested, which means that they come with certain

0:02:28.600 --> 0:02:33.399
<v Speaker 1>strings attached. To receive snap food benefits or housing assistance.

0:02:33.440 --> 0:02:36.120
<v Speaker 1>For example, you need to prove that your income is

0:02:36.160 --> 0:02:40.160
<v Speaker 1>below a certain threshold. To collect unemployment benefits, you need

0:02:40.200 --> 0:02:43.200
<v Speaker 1>to show that you're actively looking for work. To collect

0:02:43.240 --> 0:02:46.040
<v Speaker 1>Social Security retirement benefits, you have to have worked for

0:02:46.040 --> 0:02:49.800
<v Speaker 1>a minimum number of years. And that's why universal basic

0:02:49.880 --> 0:02:54.320
<v Speaker 1>income is such a radical departure from the existing welfare programs.

0:02:54.919 --> 0:02:59.560
<v Speaker 1>There's no means testing or proof required to qualify. Under

0:02:59.639 --> 0:03:03.320
<v Speaker 1>a UNI first basic income plan, every single American adult

0:03:03.360 --> 0:03:06.760
<v Speaker 1>would receive a check maybe five hundred bucks, maybe a thousand,

0:03:06.840 --> 0:03:11.240
<v Speaker 1>every month with absolutely no strings attached. Proponents of the

0:03:11.280 --> 0:03:15.080
<v Speaker 1>idea sometimes think the money should be totally unconditional, leaving

0:03:15.080 --> 0:03:17.480
<v Speaker 1>it up to the individual or family to decide how

0:03:17.520 --> 0:03:20.919
<v Speaker 1>best to use it. In some countries, universal basic income

0:03:20.960 --> 0:03:24.239
<v Speaker 1>grants are sometimes linked to recipients getting medical checkups or

0:03:24.360 --> 0:03:29.400
<v Speaker 1>sending their kids to school. But if it's unconditional, recipients

0:03:29.440 --> 0:03:32.400
<v Speaker 1>of universal basic income could use the extra money to

0:03:32.480 --> 0:03:35.840
<v Speaker 1>pay for groceries, cover rent or mortgage, or buy clothes

0:03:35.880 --> 0:03:38.600
<v Speaker 1>for the kids. They could also choose to enroll in

0:03:38.640 --> 0:03:41.960
<v Speaker 1>an online class or job skills program, take time off

0:03:42.040 --> 0:03:44.200
<v Speaker 1>to raise a baby or care for a sick parent,

0:03:44.720 --> 0:03:48.520
<v Speaker 1>or invested in starting up a new business. Part of

0:03:48.520 --> 0:03:52.000
<v Speaker 1>the idea that's right there in the name is basic income.

0:03:52.600 --> 0:03:55.200
<v Speaker 1>Even at a thousand dollars a month or more, universal

0:03:55.240 --> 0:03:58.400
<v Speaker 1>basic income would not fully replace earnings from a job,

0:03:58.800 --> 0:04:02.160
<v Speaker 1>but it would provide a much needed cushion for the underpaid,

0:04:02.280 --> 0:04:06.800
<v Speaker 1>overstressed workers who have never had the luxury of financial security.

0:04:07.480 --> 0:04:11.280
<v Speaker 1>Martin West said, universal basic income is basic, and that

0:04:11.360 --> 0:04:15.000
<v Speaker 1>it meets your basic needs, and it's guaranteed income, and

0:04:15.040 --> 0:04:20.039
<v Speaker 1>that you know that it's coming. Andrew Yang popularized the

0:04:20.120 --> 0:04:23.000
<v Speaker 1>notion of universal basic income to some extent during his

0:04:23.680 --> 0:04:27.640
<v Speaker 1>presidential run. Yang pitched his thousand dollar a month freedom

0:04:27.720 --> 0:04:31.160
<v Speaker 1>dividend as a way of protecting American workers from the

0:04:31.200 --> 0:04:34.680
<v Speaker 1>impending robot takeover of millions of jobs over the next decade.

0:04:35.480 --> 0:04:39.239
<v Speaker 1>While Martin West understands the concerns about automation and AI

0:04:39.400 --> 0:04:41.960
<v Speaker 1>in the future, she feels there are plenty of other

0:04:42.120 --> 0:04:46.080
<v Speaker 1>urgent reasons to implement a universal basic income plan today.

0:04:46.560 --> 0:04:49.400
<v Speaker 1>She gave the example of the millions of Americans who

0:04:49.440 --> 0:04:53.360
<v Speaker 1>work physically taxing gig jobs with unpredictable pay and hours

0:04:53.440 --> 0:04:57.640
<v Speaker 1>and no benefits. She said, there are people dying from

0:04:57.680 --> 0:05:01.520
<v Speaker 1>capitalism now. The inability to predict what your next paycheck

0:05:01.600 --> 0:05:03.680
<v Speaker 1>is going to be from week to week or month

0:05:03.720 --> 0:05:07.040
<v Speaker 1>to month has pretty devastating impacts on a person's stress

0:05:07.120 --> 0:05:11.760
<v Speaker 1>levels and manifests, and poor health outcomes like cardiovascular health decline,

0:05:12.080 --> 0:05:17.560
<v Speaker 1>increased rates of diabetes, and more. Stockton resident Thomas Vargas

0:05:17.640 --> 0:05:19.719
<v Speaker 1>was one of those chosen to receive a five hundred

0:05:19.720 --> 0:05:23.600
<v Speaker 1>dollar check every month through the Seed program. His shifts

0:05:23.600 --> 0:05:26.800
<v Speaker 1>at a warehouse job were unpredictable, so Vargas had to

0:05:26.839 --> 0:05:29.279
<v Speaker 1>work odd jobs late into the night to support a

0:05:29.320 --> 0:05:32.279
<v Speaker 1>family he hardly had a chance to see. With the

0:05:32.320 --> 0:05:34.680
<v Speaker 1>extra five hundred dollars, he was able to skip a

0:05:34.720 --> 0:05:37.080
<v Speaker 1>shift at the warehouse and interview for a new job

0:05:37.160 --> 0:05:40.559
<v Speaker 1>with better pay and fixed hours, freeing him to spend

0:05:40.600 --> 0:05:44.680
<v Speaker 1>more time with his family. Proponents argue that this is

0:05:44.720 --> 0:05:48.440
<v Speaker 1>one of the secondary effects of guaranteed income. A cushion

0:05:48.520 --> 0:05:51.719
<v Speaker 1>of five hundred or a thousand dollars makes workers feel

0:05:51.839 --> 0:05:54.960
<v Speaker 1>less desperate to take any job that comes along, even

0:05:55.000 --> 0:05:58.080
<v Speaker 1>if the pay is bad and the working conditions are lousy.

0:05:58.400 --> 0:06:02.840
<v Speaker 1>Martin West explained, nobody cares more about labor supply than

0:06:02.880 --> 0:06:05.839
<v Speaker 1>these big companies that tend to not treat their employees

0:06:05.960 --> 0:06:08.960
<v Speaker 1>very well. If you have employees saying I can do

0:06:09.040 --> 0:06:11.600
<v Speaker 1>better than this, and now I have this bargaining power,

0:06:12.000 --> 0:06:17.240
<v Speaker 1>then you may see improved working conditions by far. One

0:06:17.240 --> 0:06:20.039
<v Speaker 1>of the biggest benefits of universal basic income is that

0:06:20.120 --> 0:06:23.120
<v Speaker 1>it would provide a steady paycheck to people currently doing

0:06:23.200 --> 0:06:26.760
<v Speaker 1>critical work for free, namely stay at home parents and

0:06:26.839 --> 0:06:30.400
<v Speaker 1>other unpaid caregivers, who are far more likely to be women.

0:06:32.000 --> 0:06:35.440
<v Speaker 1>The biggest criticism of universal basic income is how much

0:06:35.440 --> 0:06:39.440
<v Speaker 1>it would cost. Under Yang's Freedom Dividend plan, each of

0:06:39.480 --> 0:06:42.440
<v Speaker 1>America's two d and thirty six million adults would receive

0:06:42.600 --> 0:06:45.160
<v Speaker 1>twelve thousand dollars a year, for a total of two

0:06:45.240 --> 0:06:48.359
<v Speaker 1>point eight twillion dollars, which is more than half of

0:06:48.400 --> 0:06:53.360
<v Speaker 1>the federal budget. Yang's plan allows older Americans the option

0:06:53.440 --> 0:06:57.080
<v Speaker 1>of keeping their current Social Security and Medicare benefits, while

0:06:57.160 --> 0:07:00.719
<v Speaker 1>other universal basic income proposals vow to replay the entire

0:07:00.800 --> 0:07:06.240
<v Speaker 1>welfare state with one guaranteed monthly check. Even though some

0:07:06.279 --> 0:07:08.800
<v Speaker 1>of the money could be offset by doing away with

0:07:08.880 --> 0:07:12.680
<v Speaker 1>other entitlement programs, the federal government would have to raise

0:07:12.760 --> 0:07:17.400
<v Speaker 1>taxes substantially to pay for universal basic income program. Some

0:07:17.520 --> 0:07:20.480
<v Speaker 1>of those taxes would target the wealthiest one percent and

0:07:20.520 --> 0:07:23.920
<v Speaker 1>the very technology companies that are making human workers obsolete,

0:07:24.320 --> 0:07:28.640
<v Speaker 1>but regular Americans would get hit too. For example, Yang

0:07:28.680 --> 0:07:32.280
<v Speaker 1>and others propose a value added tax of ten on

0:07:32.360 --> 0:07:37.080
<v Speaker 1>all manufactured goods. Yang also thinks that his freedom dividend

0:07:37.120 --> 0:07:41.480
<v Speaker 1>would produce more economic growth, therefore increasing the tax base,

0:07:42.080 --> 0:07:44.320
<v Speaker 1>but of course we have no way of knowing whether

0:07:44.360 --> 0:07:48.680
<v Speaker 1>that's how it would actually shake out. The supporters of

0:07:48.760 --> 0:07:53.120
<v Speaker 1>universal basic income agree that a nationwide guaranteed income program

0:07:53.200 --> 0:07:56.680
<v Speaker 1>would be enormously expensive, but they disagree that it's not

0:07:56.720 --> 0:08:00.760
<v Speaker 1>worth the investment. Martin West said, like all the decisions

0:08:00.800 --> 0:08:03.560
<v Speaker 1>this country makes, it really comes down to what is

0:08:03.560 --> 0:08:06.760
<v Speaker 1>our priority. If our priority is to let people waste

0:08:06.760 --> 0:08:09.680
<v Speaker 1>away in poverty, have ill health, have their work not

0:08:09.800 --> 0:08:13.560
<v Speaker 1>be valued, then we won't prioritize a guaranteed income as

0:08:13.600 --> 0:08:16.200
<v Speaker 1>part of our national budget. But if we do, in

0:08:16.280 --> 0:08:18.840
<v Speaker 1>fact honor the social contract that we have in the

0:08:18.920 --> 0:08:22.360
<v Speaker 1>United States, that means we should likely look at something

0:08:22.440 --> 0:08:27.360
<v Speaker 1>like a universal basic income, which leads to the second

0:08:27.440 --> 0:08:31.560
<v Speaker 1>and arguably more difficult obstacle to creating a national universal

0:08:31.560 --> 0:08:36.480
<v Speaker 1>basic income program. The belief deeply held by many Americans

0:08:36.480 --> 0:08:39.800
<v Speaker 1>that a guaranteed income is another form of government handout

0:08:39.960 --> 0:08:44.439
<v Speaker 1>that encourages people not to work. There have only been

0:08:44.480 --> 0:08:47.959
<v Speaker 1>a few real world studies so far on universal basic income.

0:08:48.559 --> 0:08:51.720
<v Speaker 1>For instance, people involved in a trial in Finland reported

0:08:51.840 --> 0:08:54.760
<v Speaker 1>less stress and the greater feelings of well being compared

0:08:54.800 --> 0:08:58.240
<v Speaker 1>to people who didn't receive the extra cash, but they

0:08:58.280 --> 0:09:01.520
<v Speaker 1>were not more likely to seek out employment, even though

0:09:01.760 --> 0:09:06.240
<v Speaker 1>they wouldn't lose the benefit if they did. The truth

0:09:06.360 --> 0:09:09.360
<v Speaker 1>is that we won't know if universal basic income plans

0:09:09.440 --> 0:09:13.640
<v Speaker 1>work until there's more data from experiments like Seed and

0:09:13.760 --> 0:09:16.360
<v Speaker 1>a half dozen more pilot programs being launched by a

0:09:16.400 --> 0:09:19.880
<v Speaker 1>group called Mayors for a Guaranteed Income. We'll have to

0:09:19.920 --> 0:09:27.520
<v Speaker 1>see how they turn out. Today's episode was written by

0:09:27.600 --> 0:09:30.000
<v Speaker 1>Dave Ruse and produced by Tyler Clang. For more on

0:09:30.040 --> 0:09:32.840
<v Speaker 1>this amounts of other topics, visit how Stuff work dot com.

0:09:32.920 --> 0:09:35.720
<v Speaker 1>Brain Stuff is production of I Heart Radio or more podcasts.

0:09:35.720 --> 0:09:38.679
<v Speaker 1>To my heart Radio visit the heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts,

0:09:38.760 --> 0:09:40.560
<v Speaker 1>or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.