WEBVTT - Bonus Episode: Here's Why the Iran War Could Hinge on Missile Math

0:00:00.120 --> 0:00:02.559
<v Speaker 1>Hello, it's even from daybreak Europe. I wanted to share

0:00:02.560 --> 0:00:05.080
<v Speaker 1>the latest episode of the other podcast that I host.

0:00:05.200 --> 0:00:07.640
<v Speaker 1>Here's Why. We look at a single story every week

0:00:07.680 --> 0:00:10.360
<v Speaker 1>and give you the context and analysis from our global

0:00:10.400 --> 0:00:13.720
<v Speaker 1>network of reporters and analysts. This week, we've been examining

0:00:13.800 --> 0:00:16.600
<v Speaker 1>the supply of weapons in the Iran war and how

0:00:16.640 --> 0:00:19.680
<v Speaker 1>that might affect what happens next. If you like the episode,

0:00:19.720 --> 0:00:22.080
<v Speaker 1>you can subscribe to us wherever you get your podcasts.

0:00:22.239 --> 0:00:23.599
<v Speaker 1>Here is Here's Why.

0:00:25.880 --> 0:00:37.920
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news.

0:00:40.320 --> 0:00:42.560
<v Speaker 1>Since the start of the war, the US and Israel

0:00:42.600 --> 0:00:45.960
<v Speaker 1>have been attacking sites across Iran. In response to Ihran

0:00:46.000 --> 0:00:49.000
<v Speaker 1>has fired hundreds of missiles and drones at targets around

0:00:49.040 --> 0:00:51.600
<v Speaker 1>the Middle East, from its neighbors in the Gulf, but

0:00:51.720 --> 0:00:55.160
<v Speaker 1>also reaching as far as Cyprus and Turkey. As the

0:00:55.200 --> 0:00:57.560
<v Speaker 1>shock of the opening days of the conflict gives way

0:00:57.600 --> 0:01:01.280
<v Speaker 1>to a more sustained campaign, some key questions are emerging,

0:01:01.760 --> 0:01:04.760
<v Speaker 1>like who could run out of weapons first, and when.

0:01:05.480 --> 0:01:07.800
<v Speaker 3>There's really a race on to figure out who expends

0:01:07.840 --> 0:01:10.600
<v Speaker 3>their ammunitions first and fastest. I don't believe that the

0:01:10.680 --> 0:01:13.200
<v Speaker 3>US entered this fight going okay, we only have enough

0:01:13.240 --> 0:01:15.679
<v Speaker 3>missiles for one week, two weeks, three weeks, or even

0:01:15.720 --> 0:01:16.200
<v Speaker 3>four weeks.

0:01:16.240 --> 0:01:19.520
<v Speaker 1>I think it's really about the tempo of taking out

0:01:19.600 --> 0:01:23.280
<v Speaker 1>the Iranian capacities for dromes and ballistic missiles.

0:01:23.360 --> 0:01:25.720
<v Speaker 3>But if you look at the basic math before the war,

0:01:25.959 --> 0:01:29.240
<v Speaker 3>I certainly favored Iran and just share numbers. The question

0:01:29.319 --> 0:01:32.800
<v Speaker 3>becomes how effective is it being at degrading those capabilities.

0:01:33.520 --> 0:01:37.280
<v Speaker 1>Here's why the around war could hinge on missile math.

0:01:40.160 --> 0:01:43.039
<v Speaker 1>Becha Wasser leads our defense research at Bloomberg Economics and

0:01:43.080 --> 0:01:46.039
<v Speaker 1>she joins US now for more. Becca, First of all,

0:01:46.080 --> 0:01:49.240
<v Speaker 1>what do we know about Iran's stockpile of missiles and

0:01:49.280 --> 0:01:50.800
<v Speaker 1>how many they may have left?

0:01:51.080 --> 0:01:54.200
<v Speaker 3>So nobody knows exactly how many they have left right now.

0:01:54.240 --> 0:01:56.440
<v Speaker 3>But I think the most important thing is it's not

0:01:56.560 --> 0:01:59.720
<v Speaker 3>just about the missile numbers. It's about whether they can

0:01:59.760 --> 0:02:04.040
<v Speaker 3>add actually use those missiles. And the United States has

0:02:04.360 --> 0:02:08.480
<v Speaker 3>really focused on degrading Iran's missile program, going after the

0:02:08.520 --> 0:02:12.440
<v Speaker 3>missile launchers and making it so those missiles that Iran

0:02:12.560 --> 0:02:16.160
<v Speaker 3>does still have they can't fire them. But that being said,

0:02:16.520 --> 0:02:21.160
<v Speaker 3>prior to the Twelve Day War, Iran had approximately two

0:02:21.240 --> 0:02:24.880
<v Speaker 3>thousand to three thousand ballistic missiles and it fired at

0:02:24.960 --> 0:02:29.400
<v Speaker 3>least five hundred of those. It spent some time reconstituting

0:02:29.840 --> 0:02:33.080
<v Speaker 3>prior to this current conflict, so they probably have a

0:02:33.080 --> 0:02:36.200
<v Speaker 3>sizeable amount. And it's worth noting that they've got missiles

0:02:36.320 --> 0:02:39.440
<v Speaker 3>of different ranges, short range missiles that they've used to

0:02:39.680 --> 0:02:43.560
<v Speaker 3>strike the Gulf States, medium range missiles that they've used

0:02:43.760 --> 0:02:47.400
<v Speaker 3>in places like Jordan and Israel, as well as some

0:02:47.480 --> 0:02:50.320
<v Speaker 3>long range missiles that we haven't really seen play such

0:02:50.360 --> 0:02:52.919
<v Speaker 3>a large role in this fight. They also have a

0:02:53.000 --> 0:02:56.679
<v Speaker 3>number of drones and cruise missiles, and those also come

0:02:56.720 --> 0:02:57.240
<v Speaker 3>into play.

0:02:57.800 --> 0:02:59.919
<v Speaker 1>Well, let's talk a little bit more about the drone

0:03:00.120 --> 0:03:02.840
<v Speaker 1>which are of course cheaper and faster to produce. What

0:03:02.880 --> 0:03:04.920
<v Speaker 1>do we know about the capacity that Iran has in

0:03:05.000 --> 0:03:05.560
<v Speaker 1>that area.

0:03:06.320 --> 0:03:10.840
<v Speaker 3>So Iran as by my account, fired over three thousand

0:03:11.000 --> 0:03:14.120
<v Speaker 3>drones at the Gulf States alone at this juncture in

0:03:14.200 --> 0:03:17.000
<v Speaker 3>time in the conflict. As you said, they're cheap, they're

0:03:17.120 --> 0:03:21.600
<v Speaker 3>roughly you know, twenty to fifty thousand dollars. They've used

0:03:21.600 --> 0:03:25.560
<v Speaker 3>them to great effect to create a number of economic

0:03:25.600 --> 0:03:28.600
<v Speaker 3>costs as well as psychological costs on the Golf States

0:03:28.600 --> 0:03:32.399
<v Speaker 3>and the global economy. They've managed to fire these at

0:03:32.440 --> 0:03:35.120
<v Speaker 3>a pretty consistent rate, and part of that is because

0:03:35.160 --> 0:03:38.160
<v Speaker 3>they can't rely on their missiles as much, so they've

0:03:38.160 --> 0:03:41.520
<v Speaker 3>tried to make up for that with their use of drones.

0:03:42.160 --> 0:03:46.560
<v Speaker 3>We imagine that right now there is still some drone capacity,

0:03:46.680 --> 0:03:51.240
<v Speaker 3>drone production capacity that Iran still has, but a lot

0:03:51.280 --> 0:03:53.720
<v Speaker 3>of the US and Israeli strikes have also tried to

0:03:53.760 --> 0:03:58.760
<v Speaker 3>go after some of the drone storage locations and production facilities,

0:03:58.800 --> 0:04:01.920
<v Speaker 3>really going after the heart of their drone and missile

0:04:01.960 --> 0:04:05.000
<v Speaker 3>programs and making it so that they can't replenish and

0:04:05.040 --> 0:04:08.920
<v Speaker 3>they can't reconstitute either during the conflict or into the future.

0:04:09.240 --> 0:04:11.320
<v Speaker 1>So that speaks to I suppose the possibility of them

0:04:11.360 --> 0:04:15.240
<v Speaker 1>being able to replenish those stocks too. What about the

0:04:15.280 --> 0:04:17.800
<v Speaker 1>pace of attacks that we've seen, though there's been some

0:04:17.960 --> 0:04:21.239
<v Speaker 1>change in cadence as we've moved into the second week

0:04:21.800 --> 0:04:24.479
<v Speaker 1>of this war, what does that tell us about the

0:04:24.520 --> 0:04:26.560
<v Speaker 1>strategy that Iran appears to be adopting.

0:04:27.279 --> 0:04:31.920
<v Speaker 3>So, by my calculations, Iran's missile and drone attacks are

0:04:32.040 --> 0:04:37.000
<v Speaker 3>down approximately eighty three percent from the start of the conflict,

0:04:37.120 --> 0:04:39.480
<v Speaker 3>and there's a few different reasons for this. The first

0:04:39.600 --> 0:04:43.520
<v Speaker 3>is those initial salvos were quite large. They were intended

0:04:43.560 --> 0:04:47.240
<v Speaker 3>to overwhelm. They were intended to overwhelm air defenses, to

0:04:47.400 --> 0:04:49.760
<v Speaker 3>extract costs, and to try and make it so that

0:04:49.800 --> 0:04:53.840
<v Speaker 3>the Gulf States in particular didn't become partied to the fight.

0:04:54.560 --> 0:04:58.919
<v Speaker 3>Since then, we've seen continued use of those drone attacks,

0:04:59.279 --> 0:05:03.320
<v Speaker 3>and part of them is because of the attrition that

0:05:03.400 --> 0:05:06.480
<v Speaker 3>Iran has taken to some of its missile launchers and

0:05:06.560 --> 0:05:09.760
<v Speaker 3>trying to continue to use what it can. But even

0:05:09.800 --> 0:05:13.159
<v Speaker 3>though drones don't require dedicated launchers, you still have to

0:05:13.200 --> 0:05:15.760
<v Speaker 3>move them out into the open. You need to position

0:05:15.880 --> 0:05:18.640
<v Speaker 3>them and be able to get them off the ground,

0:05:18.800 --> 0:05:21.920
<v Speaker 3>and that means that they are viable targets for both

0:05:22.160 --> 0:05:26.159
<v Speaker 3>US and Israel to strike. So that has also degraded

0:05:26.240 --> 0:05:30.400
<v Speaker 3>some of the tempo that we've seen in those attacks. Really,

0:05:30.400 --> 0:05:32.400
<v Speaker 3>what I think we're seeing right now is a shift

0:05:32.440 --> 0:05:35.719
<v Speaker 3>to what I would term an attritional approach from Iran,

0:05:36.120 --> 0:05:38.680
<v Speaker 3>where they're in it for the long haul and they're

0:05:38.680 --> 0:05:43.280
<v Speaker 3>trying to impose costs slowly over time, and all they

0:05:43.320 --> 0:05:45.200
<v Speaker 3>need to do is just keep up the pace of

0:05:45.279 --> 0:05:48.440
<v Speaker 3>attacks and make it so that there are attacks every

0:05:48.520 --> 0:05:53.920
<v Speaker 3>single day rather than have intense attacks every single day.

0:05:54.279 --> 0:05:56.560
<v Speaker 3>We've also seen them have a shift in targeting, where

0:05:56.560 --> 0:06:00.480
<v Speaker 3>they're targeting has seemingly gotten better Rather than these large

0:06:00.560 --> 0:06:04.640
<v Speaker 3>salvos of both drones and missiles, we see drones being

0:06:04.680 --> 0:06:09.520
<v Speaker 3>able to cause some damage to critical infrastructure, including oil infrastructure,

0:06:09.600 --> 0:06:14.279
<v Speaker 3>AI data centers, population centers, as well as really critical

0:06:14.360 --> 0:06:18.640
<v Speaker 3>military hardware like radars needed for air defense. So we're

0:06:18.640 --> 0:06:21.880
<v Speaker 3>seeing the start of a cost and position strategy. That

0:06:22.040 --> 0:06:26.120
<v Speaker 3>means that Iran's probably also trying to preserve some capabilities

0:06:26.200 --> 0:06:27.320
<v Speaker 3>in case of a long war.

0:06:28.120 --> 0:06:30.560
<v Speaker 1>What about the weapons that the US and it's partners

0:06:30.600 --> 0:06:33.279
<v Speaker 1>are using to defend against Iran's attacks, and of course

0:06:33.320 --> 0:06:36.200
<v Speaker 1>the continuing strikes on the US and Israeli sides as well,

0:06:36.560 --> 0:06:41.200
<v Speaker 1>stretched to those stockpiles and how quickly could they be replaced?

0:06:41.400 --> 0:06:45.719
<v Speaker 3>So I think it's worth making a difference between air

0:06:45.760 --> 0:06:49.479
<v Speaker 3>defense interceptors and some of the offensive missiles that the

0:06:49.640 --> 0:06:53.520
<v Speaker 3>US and Israel are using. The offensive missiles, while yes,

0:06:53.520 --> 0:06:56.400
<v Speaker 3>there are limited stockpiles for some of those higher end

0:06:56.680 --> 0:07:00.800
<v Speaker 3>long range capabilities, they do exist in greater members and

0:07:01.480 --> 0:07:04.200
<v Speaker 3>I think that it's very likely that the United States

0:07:04.240 --> 0:07:08.480
<v Speaker 3>and Israel could sustain the conflict over time without having

0:07:08.560 --> 0:07:13.240
<v Speaker 3>to dip too far into their stockpiles. Although there may

0:07:13.280 --> 0:07:17.440
<v Speaker 3>be some pulling of missiles and munitions from one theater,

0:07:17.600 --> 0:07:20.600
<v Speaker 3>say Europe or the Indo Pacific, to the Middle East.

0:07:21.120 --> 0:07:23.960
<v Speaker 3>Air defense interceptors are a little bit harder because they're

0:07:24.040 --> 0:07:27.560
<v Speaker 3>so in demand. There's never enough air defense to go around,

0:07:27.960 --> 0:07:31.000
<v Speaker 3>and there's air defense for the US, and then there's

0:07:31.040 --> 0:07:33.800
<v Speaker 3>also the air defense interceptors that it sells to the

0:07:33.800 --> 0:07:38.120
<v Speaker 3>Gulf States and other regional allies. So when you have that,

0:07:38.200 --> 0:07:41.160
<v Speaker 3>there is this stress and strain on the US defense

0:07:41.160 --> 0:07:44.200
<v Speaker 3>industrial base to produce more, and they're trying to quickly

0:07:44.280 --> 0:07:48.320
<v Speaker 3>ramp up production. There's a new push to quadruple production

0:07:48.600 --> 0:07:52.240
<v Speaker 3>of really critical interceptors, but that's not going to happen

0:07:52.360 --> 0:07:56.440
<v Speaker 3>until twenty thirty and you're moving from producing say ninety

0:07:56.480 --> 0:08:00.280
<v Speaker 3>six bad interceptors per year to close to four hundhre

0:08:00.640 --> 0:08:04.120
<v Speaker 3>in the twenty thirties, so replenishment is not going to

0:08:04.160 --> 0:08:04.559
<v Speaker 3>be quick.

0:08:05.280 --> 0:08:08.200
<v Speaker 1>All of that being said, if the fighting then continues

0:08:08.240 --> 0:08:11.440
<v Speaker 1>at this intensity, what is likely to become the most

0:08:11.480 --> 0:08:12.360
<v Speaker 1>limiting factor?

0:08:12.480 --> 0:08:17.000
<v Speaker 3>First, I think the most limiting factor is not the

0:08:17.000 --> 0:08:21.040
<v Speaker 3>one that you can count. It's not missiles and munitions

0:08:21.200 --> 0:08:24.720
<v Speaker 3>it's not going to be things like force readiness. It's

0:08:24.760 --> 0:08:28.640
<v Speaker 3>going to actually be political will. The ability to wage war,

0:08:28.840 --> 0:08:32.240
<v Speaker 3>and frankly, the ability to terminate war is so based

0:08:32.320 --> 0:08:35.760
<v Speaker 3>on political will, and it's going to require leaders who

0:08:35.800 --> 0:08:38.520
<v Speaker 3>are able to do that, and that is something that

0:08:38.559 --> 0:08:41.360
<v Speaker 3>we can't quite quantify, and I think we're already starting

0:08:41.360 --> 0:08:44.720
<v Speaker 3>to see shifts in that direction. We're starting to see

0:08:44.720 --> 0:08:47.560
<v Speaker 3>President Donald Trump say that the war is going to

0:08:47.679 --> 0:08:50.040
<v Speaker 3>end soon and he can end it whenever he wants.

0:08:50.360 --> 0:08:52.520
<v Speaker 3>At the same time that he's saying the US can

0:08:52.559 --> 0:08:55.679
<v Speaker 3>sustain this conflict for as long as it takes. So,

0:08:56.120 --> 0:08:58.000
<v Speaker 3>when it comes down to it, what we should be

0:08:58.040 --> 0:09:00.640
<v Speaker 3>looking at, it's not just the math, it's also the

0:09:00.640 --> 0:09:01.520
<v Speaker 3>political part.

0:09:02.000 --> 0:09:05.439
<v Speaker 1>Okay, Becca Wasser, leading our defense research at Bloomberg Economics.

0:09:05.440 --> 0:09:08.800
<v Speaker 1>Thank you For more explanations like this from our team

0:09:08.840 --> 0:09:11.680
<v Speaker 1>of three thousand journalists and analysts around the world, go

0:09:11.720 --> 0:09:16.480
<v Speaker 1>to Bloomberg dot com slash explainers. I'm Stephen Carroll. This

0:09:16.600 --> 0:09:18.920
<v Speaker 1>is here's why. I'll be back next week with more.

0:09:19.240 --> 0:09:20.000
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening.