WEBVTT - The Rise of the Quick-Buck ETF

0:00:05.519 --> 0:00:07.400
<v Speaker 1>Bok No Trillions. I'm Joel Webber and.

0:00:07.400 --> 0:00:11.640
<v Speaker 2>I'm Eric Balchunis.

0:00:12.160 --> 0:00:15.600
<v Speaker 1>There is this headline that jumped out at me the

0:00:15.720 --> 0:00:19.120
<v Speaker 1>moment I saw it. It was a big take from

0:00:19.360 --> 0:00:26.200
<v Speaker 1>our colleagues Danizza Takova and Veldonajdrik. It describes something called

0:00:26.200 --> 0:00:29.440
<v Speaker 1>a quick buck ETF and that immediately made me go,

0:00:29.720 --> 0:00:32.320
<v Speaker 1>we got to talk to them and a character in

0:00:32.360 --> 0:00:35.479
<v Speaker 1>the story, but you know, set the table for us.

0:00:35.520 --> 0:00:40.320
<v Speaker 1>What is a quick buck ETF? According to Eric Baltunis, well.

0:00:40.640 --> 0:00:45.599
<v Speaker 2>Look, over the years, there's been a sort of movement

0:00:46.000 --> 0:00:49.159
<v Speaker 2>to launch kind of unusual products. So try to get

0:00:49.200 --> 0:00:51.800
<v Speaker 2>very creative for the ETF industry. Why the core of

0:00:51.800 --> 0:00:54.280
<v Speaker 2>the portfolio? A lot of people go to like cheap

0:00:54.280 --> 0:00:56.920
<v Speaker 2>index funds and you can't really compete there. What are

0:00:56.920 --> 0:00:59.120
<v Speaker 2>you gonna do? Launch like a two basis point SMP

0:00:59.240 --> 0:01:02.760
<v Speaker 2>five hundred, hang Guard and Blackrock own the core. So

0:01:02.840 --> 0:01:04.520
<v Speaker 2>what a lot of issuers are doing is trying to

0:01:04.520 --> 0:01:07.560
<v Speaker 2>innovate their way to something different and new. Some are

0:01:07.560 --> 0:01:11.160
<v Speaker 2>innovating on the buffer side to sort of ease worry

0:01:11.160 --> 0:01:14.280
<v Speaker 2>for older investors, and some are innovating to try to

0:01:14.360 --> 0:01:17.080
<v Speaker 2>appeal to younger investors and retail investors who may favor

0:01:17.120 --> 0:01:21.080
<v Speaker 2>income over total returns or in some cases a lot

0:01:21.120 --> 0:01:24.479
<v Speaker 2>of leverage. We call it packaged adrenaline. So on that front,

0:01:24.520 --> 0:01:26.640
<v Speaker 2>we have this, you know, sort of phrase we call

0:01:26.720 --> 0:01:29.600
<v Speaker 2>hot sauce, and we have there's like six different flavors

0:01:29.640 --> 0:01:32.040
<v Speaker 2>of hot sauce, and one of them are these I

0:01:32.080 --> 0:01:34.120
<v Speaker 2>call them yield boost that's the brand name of one

0:01:34.160 --> 0:01:37.760
<v Speaker 2>of them. But the yield Boosters, this one firm went

0:01:37.800 --> 0:01:39.399
<v Speaker 2>from like no money at the beginning of the year

0:01:39.440 --> 0:01:43.480
<v Speaker 2>to like four billion, and every product has inflows and

0:01:43.520 --> 0:01:45.759
<v Speaker 2>they just write call options barely out of the money,

0:01:45.800 --> 0:01:48.280
<v Speaker 2>so you give up almost all your upside, but you

0:01:48.320 --> 0:01:51.520
<v Speaker 2>get a giant fat yield. So some of them yield

0:01:51.560 --> 0:01:56.080
<v Speaker 2>over one hundred percent. So it's just another example of

0:01:56.120 --> 0:01:59.000
<v Speaker 2>how the ETF industry is a big tent serving many

0:01:59.040 --> 0:02:03.960
<v Speaker 2>different people, and this is one sort of evolution in

0:02:04.000 --> 0:02:05.400
<v Speaker 2>what I call the hot sauce bucket.

0:02:06.240 --> 0:02:08.360
<v Speaker 1>We're going to be speaking with Denisa and Veldona, our

0:02:08.480 --> 0:02:11.640
<v Speaker 1>cross asset reporters with Bloomberg News, as well as one

0:02:11.639 --> 0:02:14.360
<v Speaker 1>of our sources, Todd Can. You can find him on

0:02:14.400 --> 0:02:22.480
<v Speaker 1>YouTube at Unconventional Wealth Ideas, this time on trillions quick

0:02:22.520 --> 0:02:28.560
<v Speaker 1>buck ETFs. Deniza Veldonna Todd, Welcome to Trillions.

0:02:29.000 --> 0:02:29.880
<v Speaker 3>Thanks for having.

0:02:29.680 --> 0:02:31.880
<v Speaker 4>Me, Thanks for having me, thanks for having us.

0:02:32.840 --> 0:02:35.520
<v Speaker 1>Okay, Denise, I want to start with you. How did

0:02:35.560 --> 0:02:37.959
<v Speaker 1>you spot what became this story?

0:02:39.120 --> 0:02:42.399
<v Speaker 4>Well, we saw we look at Reddit, and we look

0:02:42.440 --> 0:02:45.440
<v Speaker 4>at one of the firms, field Max, which Eric mentioned earlier,

0:02:45.919 --> 0:02:49.680
<v Speaker 4>and he'd already had ten thousands readitors tweeting about it

0:02:49.720 --> 0:02:52.960
<v Speaker 4>every day, talking about it every day. And then we

0:02:53.000 --> 0:02:57.040
<v Speaker 4>looked at the inflows and the growth was incredible. Just

0:02:57.080 --> 0:02:59.800
<v Speaker 4>to give you an example, their first CDs was just

0:03:00.040 --> 0:03:03.560
<v Speaker 4>two years ago and this year they launched nearly twenty

0:03:03.600 --> 0:03:06.800
<v Speaker 4>products anything you can imagine. They have single stock products,

0:03:06.800 --> 0:03:10.560
<v Speaker 4>they have inverse in those talk products that generate income,

0:03:11.280 --> 0:03:14.360
<v Speaker 4>and then we realized that there is a much broader

0:03:14.480 --> 0:03:18.639
<v Speaker 4>universe there. First, they charge us higher than average fees.

0:03:19.400 --> 0:03:21.920
<v Speaker 4>We often see fees in the range of one percent

0:03:21.960 --> 0:03:24.640
<v Speaker 4>in those products. So we saw a lot of new

0:03:24.840 --> 0:03:28.960
<v Speaker 4>issues being part of that movement. We looked at the

0:03:29.040 --> 0:03:32.480
<v Speaker 4>data and actually at the broader universe of the rialties

0:03:32.480 --> 0:03:36.040
<v Speaker 4>and enhanced product We saw over one hundred and sixty launches,

0:03:36.600 --> 0:03:39.200
<v Speaker 4>which is a record high. We looked at the assets

0:03:39.240 --> 0:03:42.400
<v Speaker 4>under management and it's just the growth is so rapid.

0:03:42.520 --> 0:03:46.600
<v Speaker 4>It reached three hundred billion, and just five years ago

0:03:46.680 --> 0:03:49.840
<v Speaker 4>it was like fifty billion. So the more you looked

0:03:49.840 --> 0:03:52.920
<v Speaker 4>into the space, the more you found the social media marketing,

0:03:53.240 --> 0:03:57.040
<v Speaker 4>the long YouTube videos, like a whole universe of people

0:03:57.080 --> 0:04:01.160
<v Speaker 4>that engage into this community daily that call it a

0:04:01.240 --> 0:04:04.600
<v Speaker 4>yield community that you know, there are hundreds of products

0:04:04.640 --> 0:04:09.040
<v Speaker 4>they talk about and compare and discuss. So it's really

0:04:09.120 --> 0:04:11.560
<v Speaker 4>something that's been growing by the day. We run the

0:04:11.600 --> 0:04:13.440
<v Speaker 4>data at the beginning of the story, and we pretty

0:04:13.480 --> 0:04:15.680
<v Speaker 4>much had to update it every day because there were

0:04:15.760 --> 0:04:18.679
<v Speaker 4>so many launches coming. Some of them had like twenty

0:04:18.680 --> 0:04:23.120
<v Speaker 4>five products in them. So it's just like insane amount

0:04:23.160 --> 0:04:24.880
<v Speaker 4>of products that are coming to the market at a

0:04:25.000 --> 0:04:25.760
<v Speaker 4>very rapid base.

0:04:26.920 --> 0:04:30.080
<v Speaker 1>Okay, well, Dona tell us more about what the products

0:04:30.120 --> 0:04:33.719
<v Speaker 1>are and what an investor might hope to accomplish with them.

0:04:34.120 --> 0:04:36.320
<v Speaker 5>So, as the NITSA mentioned, there's more than one hundred

0:04:36.360 --> 0:04:39.159
<v Speaker 5>and sixty new ones just so far this year, which

0:04:39.440 --> 0:04:43.240
<v Speaker 5>is a record high for the number of new We

0:04:43.279 --> 0:04:47.080
<v Speaker 5>call them in the story derivatives enhanced exchange traded funds.

0:04:47.360 --> 0:04:50.320
<v Speaker 5>You can divide them, as Eric does, into a number

0:04:50.320 --> 0:04:53.680
<v Speaker 5>of different categories. We focused on two main categories in

0:04:53.720 --> 0:04:57.880
<v Speaker 5>the story. One is the ones that have like the

0:04:57.960 --> 0:05:04.000
<v Speaker 5>options overlays that then have these hefty yields, these hefty payouts,

0:05:04.279 --> 0:05:07.479
<v Speaker 5>and another one is the single stock version, so those

0:05:07.520 --> 0:05:12.039
<v Speaker 5>are levered or inverse funds that focus on just one company.

0:05:12.440 --> 0:05:16.040
<v Speaker 5>One of the most popular ones is based on Navidia

0:05:16.120 --> 0:05:19.039
<v Speaker 5>No Surprise. This year, and we mentioned in the story

0:05:19.160 --> 0:05:22.120
<v Speaker 5>its assets grew from like two hundred million at the

0:05:22.120 --> 0:05:24.880
<v Speaker 5>start of the year to five billion dollars currently, So

0:05:25.560 --> 0:05:28.880
<v Speaker 5>just a tremendous amount of money is going towards anything

0:05:28.920 --> 0:05:33.279
<v Speaker 5>that can sort of catch people's attention these days. Obviously,

0:05:33.320 --> 0:05:35.279
<v Speaker 5>then Navidio one is actually a really good example because

0:05:35.360 --> 0:05:39.160
<v Speaker 5>Navidia has the stock itself has been doing so well,

0:05:39.480 --> 0:05:42.480
<v Speaker 5>and so then what people do is turn towards some

0:05:42.520 --> 0:05:45.720
<v Speaker 5>of these ETFs that can amp up these returns and

0:05:45.800 --> 0:05:49.600
<v Speaker 5>just juice things up even further and make things more exciting.

0:05:50.240 --> 0:05:52.360
<v Speaker 2>And a lot of the launches are because you've got

0:05:52.400 --> 0:05:54.839
<v Speaker 2>to cover all these stocks, so there's going to be

0:05:54.880 --> 0:05:57.719
<v Speaker 2>like dozens and dozens of these over the years. I

0:05:57.760 --> 0:06:01.320
<v Speaker 2>think Granted Shares has a filing to do this sort

0:06:01.360 --> 0:06:04.000
<v Speaker 2>of yield boost thing. I think their firm is called

0:06:04.080 --> 0:06:06.839
<v Speaker 2>yield Boost yield Boost, Yes, and they're going to do

0:06:06.960 --> 0:06:09.919
<v Speaker 2>like three x q's yield boosts. So they're gonna do

0:06:10.600 --> 0:06:14.120
<v Speaker 2>yield boost thing on something already really boosted. And I

0:06:14.120 --> 0:06:16.560
<v Speaker 2>also noticed something funny about this. In Canada, there's an

0:06:16.560 --> 0:06:19.960
<v Speaker 2>issue called there's an issue called Yield Maximizer, and their

0:06:20.000 --> 0:06:23.640
<v Speaker 2>product line was Yield in all caps, but then Maximizer

0:06:24.000 --> 0:06:26.760
<v Speaker 2>was in capital M and then lowercase, and they had

0:06:26.800 --> 0:06:28.960
<v Speaker 2>an official name change for all their funds. And normally

0:06:29.000 --> 0:06:32.760
<v Speaker 2>when you see that the name changes like dramatically or substantially.

0:06:33.240 --> 0:06:38.200
<v Speaker 2>They just wanted to capitalize maximizer, so they and that's

0:06:38.200 --> 0:06:40.760
<v Speaker 2>what I got a feeling that there's this like sort

0:06:40.760 --> 0:06:45.760
<v Speaker 2>of race to package and push the envelope. I think

0:06:45.800 --> 0:06:48.840
<v Speaker 2>of that top gun meme need for speed. You know,

0:06:49.040 --> 0:06:54.240
<v Speaker 2>there is just a market for volatility, big numbers, and

0:06:54.320 --> 0:06:57.600
<v Speaker 2>it's a you know, largely retail traders who are looking

0:06:57.640 --> 0:06:57.920
<v Speaker 2>for this.

0:06:58.680 --> 0:07:00.679
<v Speaker 1>Okay, speaking of retail trader, so I'm going to bring

0:07:00.760 --> 0:07:05.240
<v Speaker 1>Todd Akenn here. Todd, you are a retail trader and

0:07:05.320 --> 0:07:08.480
<v Speaker 1>you have a growing YouTube channel. Talk to us about

0:07:08.560 --> 0:07:12.040
<v Speaker 1>how you got into this specific type of ETF.

0:07:12.640 --> 0:07:12.880
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:07:12.880 --> 0:07:15.960
<v Speaker 3>Well, thanks for having me everyone once again. And well,

0:07:16.040 --> 0:07:20.040
<v Speaker 3>when I started Unconventional wealth Ideas, I was investing in

0:07:20.080 --> 0:07:24.480
<v Speaker 3>the more traditional kinds of ETFs, and then subscribers would

0:07:24.480 --> 0:07:27.560
<v Speaker 3>bring yield max and these other ideas to me, and

0:07:27.600 --> 0:07:29.920
<v Speaker 3>then I realized that not only is it a way

0:07:30.000 --> 0:07:34.040
<v Speaker 3>to get more attention of my videos, but I thought, well,

0:07:34.080 --> 0:07:36.760
<v Speaker 3>maybe there's a way to actually make this investment viable

0:07:37.200 --> 0:07:40.400
<v Speaker 3>and work for everyone. And so it doesn't really work

0:07:40.440 --> 0:07:43.520
<v Speaker 3>for others because they don't really play them right. But

0:07:43.560 --> 0:07:47.880
<v Speaker 3>if you use them properly and you blend them with

0:07:47.960 --> 0:07:50.400
<v Speaker 3>other ETFs that give you the growth so you don't

0:07:50.440 --> 0:07:52.800
<v Speaker 3>have as much nabdicate, then you can kind of get

0:07:52.840 --> 0:07:57.480
<v Speaker 3>an overall blend of ETFs that help you outperform the market.

0:07:58.440 --> 0:08:01.840
<v Speaker 1>Talk to us about the specific products that you've used

0:08:02.200 --> 0:08:04.560
<v Speaker 1>and what kind of experience you've had.

0:08:06.000 --> 0:08:10.120
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, well, the first ETFs that came out were Tesla,

0:08:10.480 --> 0:08:13.480
<v Speaker 3>and you know the more popular stocks that everyone trades,

0:08:13.520 --> 0:08:16.760
<v Speaker 3>Tesla and Video. So we had Tesley and vide and

0:08:17.400 --> 0:08:22.120
<v Speaker 3>Tesla was struggling with its stock price. So tes Lee

0:08:22.360 --> 0:08:25.560
<v Speaker 3>was not liked by many people in the community. They

0:08:25.640 --> 0:08:29.200
<v Speaker 3>kept saying, the nab erosion is so bad. And how

0:08:29.200 --> 0:08:30.920
<v Speaker 3>are you ever going to get back to even on this,

0:08:31.520 --> 0:08:34.040
<v Speaker 3>you know, with this investment. But I'm always from the

0:08:34.080 --> 0:08:37.160
<v Speaker 3>camp that if you hold your dividends long enough, you'll

0:08:37.200 --> 0:08:40.520
<v Speaker 3>eventually cash flow. But the key with Tesli is that

0:08:40.559 --> 0:08:42.840
<v Speaker 3>you can't live out of it because if you're trying

0:08:42.880 --> 0:08:44.640
<v Speaker 3>to live out of Tesli and live free from your

0:08:44.720 --> 0:08:47.840
<v Speaker 3>nine to five with things like Tesli, well, that obviously

0:08:47.840 --> 0:08:50.720
<v Speaker 3>has too much volatility. It drops, it can be a

0:08:50.760 --> 0:08:54.600
<v Speaker 3>widow maker in your account by itself. And so you know,

0:08:54.640 --> 0:08:56.880
<v Speaker 3>you don't want to have too much stock exposure anyway

0:08:56.960 --> 0:08:59.359
<v Speaker 3>with any one stock. You want to stay with the indexes.

0:08:59.720 --> 0:09:02.640
<v Speaker 3>So Tesla just had bad luck, you know, and share

0:09:02.679 --> 0:09:06.480
<v Speaker 3>prices down. So Tesley was was not a favorite for others.

0:09:06.520 --> 0:09:09.840
<v Speaker 3>But if you hold it long enough, you'll come out

0:09:09.880 --> 0:09:12.120
<v Speaker 3>on top, you know, if you hold it long enough.

0:09:12.160 --> 0:09:14.800
<v Speaker 3>And so that's my belief is well, cash flow eventually,

0:09:14.840 --> 0:09:17.840
<v Speaker 3>but in the meantime, in the meantime, how can you

0:09:17.880 --> 0:09:20.800
<v Speaker 3>still get performance and not only outperform the markets, but

0:09:20.880 --> 0:09:24.199
<v Speaker 3>withdraw freely out of your account without it cannibalizing your account.

0:09:24.360 --> 0:09:26.560
<v Speaker 3>So we combine it with other yield max ETFs that

0:09:26.640 --> 0:09:30.199
<v Speaker 3>actually grow, you know, some other yield Max stocks have

0:09:30.280 --> 0:09:33.640
<v Speaker 3>been doing doing well. In VIDI was doing well. It

0:09:33.720 --> 0:09:36.760
<v Speaker 3>was moving upward left right on its chart, so even

0:09:36.760 --> 0:09:39.560
<v Speaker 3>though it was it had a huge dividend, you're still

0:09:39.600 --> 0:09:42.480
<v Speaker 3>getting some growth. So people were really happy with NVIDI,

0:09:42.920 --> 0:09:46.360
<v Speaker 3>not happy with Tesli, and I just started, you know,

0:09:46.880 --> 0:09:50.679
<v Speaker 3>diversifying my portfolio out with the you know, Amazon's apples

0:09:50.720 --> 0:09:53.160
<v Speaker 3>of the world through yield Max, and then they came

0:09:53.160 --> 0:09:55.360
<v Speaker 3>out with their fund of funds, which helped give a

0:09:55.360 --> 0:09:59.760
<v Speaker 3>little bit more diversification and stability with volatility, but still

0:09:59.800 --> 0:10:02.160
<v Speaker 3>that it wasn't quite enough to live out of your

0:10:02.160 --> 0:10:03.840
<v Speaker 3>account with. You have to combine it with some of

0:10:03.840 --> 0:10:06.599
<v Speaker 3>these other funds that have come, you know, out to

0:10:06.679 --> 0:10:09.720
<v Speaker 3>the market. Now. Like you know, y'all mentioned yield Boost,

0:10:10.160 --> 0:10:14.040
<v Speaker 3>there's also defiance and rec shares and stuff like that,

0:10:14.080 --> 0:10:16.679
<v Speaker 3>which all help balance out your portfolio a little bit better.

0:10:17.559 --> 0:10:21.000
<v Speaker 4>And I think something that Total also mentioned there is

0:10:21.040 --> 0:10:24.719
<v Speaker 4>such a wide variety of products. And we talked a

0:10:24.760 --> 0:10:27.760
<v Speaker 4>lot about the smaller firms that have been around for

0:10:27.840 --> 0:10:30.400
<v Speaker 4>just a few years. But for example, one of the

0:10:30.400 --> 0:10:34.400
<v Speaker 4>biggest products is coming from JP Morgan Acid Management, and

0:10:34.920 --> 0:10:37.800
<v Speaker 4>during twenty twenty two, that product actually worked quite well.

0:10:37.840 --> 0:10:41.160
<v Speaker 4>There's obviously a massive sell of and due to the

0:10:41.200 --> 0:10:46.880
<v Speaker 4>covered code nature, they manage to outperform the SMP and

0:10:47.040 --> 0:10:50.800
<v Speaker 4>Acid jumped to seventeen billion. I think they kind of

0:10:50.960 --> 0:10:53.679
<v Speaker 4>tripled in twenty twenty two, which you know was a

0:10:53.760 --> 0:10:58.280
<v Speaker 4>year when people were staying away, you know, staying in cash,

0:10:58.360 --> 0:11:01.880
<v Speaker 4>being careful and JEPI got that popularity. So we have

0:11:02.000 --> 0:11:06.160
<v Speaker 4>those big players actually running some of the biggest products now.

0:11:06.400 --> 0:11:11.560
<v Speaker 4>Is thirty six billion obviously really really big TTF, A

0:11:11.559 --> 0:11:14.880
<v Speaker 4>lot of options, people are writing about it whatever it's rebouncing,

0:11:14.960 --> 0:11:20.000
<v Speaker 4>so it has its own power and importance in the market.

0:11:20.360 --> 0:11:24.400
<v Speaker 4>Goldman is also having similar products. A lot of the

0:11:24.400 --> 0:11:27.480
<v Speaker 4>big issuers are working on them, whether it's Buffer, whether

0:11:27.480 --> 0:11:32.600
<v Speaker 4>it's covered CO. They're less likely to engage with retail,

0:11:33.240 --> 0:11:37.040
<v Speaker 4>even though we've seen some of the portfolio managers like

0:11:37.080 --> 0:11:39.679
<v Speaker 4>Hamilton Reiner, you know, I've seen a few videos of

0:11:39.760 --> 0:11:42.440
<v Speaker 4>him on YouTube engaging with some of them. But it's

0:11:42.480 --> 0:11:47.840
<v Speaker 4>really those mainstream products like eield Max, like Tidal, they're

0:11:47.880 --> 0:11:54.840
<v Speaker 4>really encouraging that interaction with retail traders. And something they're

0:11:54.880 --> 0:11:57.240
<v Speaker 4>saying is a lot of maybe the big names like

0:11:57.320 --> 0:12:01.839
<v Speaker 4>JP Morgan and you know, big financial institutions are maybe

0:12:01.920 --> 0:12:05.040
<v Speaker 4>underestimating retail traders. You are not going directly to them,

0:12:05.520 --> 0:12:07.960
<v Speaker 4>so they find this is a way to market and

0:12:08.000 --> 0:12:11.160
<v Speaker 4>reach a new audience. And indeed they're seeing big impact

0:12:11.240 --> 0:12:13.920
<v Speaker 4>from it. After each video they appear, they're saying, oh,

0:12:13.920 --> 0:12:16.959
<v Speaker 4>we're seeing more inflows after we go on YouTube. So

0:12:17.000 --> 0:12:19.559
<v Speaker 4>it tells you a lot about how the ETF industry

0:12:19.600 --> 0:12:20.040
<v Speaker 4>is changing.

0:12:28.200 --> 0:12:32.120
<v Speaker 2>Jeffy, which is the JP Morgan equity premium income, I

0:12:32.120 --> 0:12:36.080
<v Speaker 2>would call that more conservative. That's writing call options way

0:12:36.120 --> 0:12:40.120
<v Speaker 2>out of the money, right, so you get some upside,

0:12:39.840 --> 0:12:42.320
<v Speaker 2>you get a little income like eight nine percent. As

0:12:42.360 --> 0:12:46.120
<v Speaker 2>you said, those I think are really appealing to older investors,

0:12:46.120 --> 0:12:47.920
<v Speaker 2>but some younger One guy on our team we call

0:12:47.960 --> 0:12:50.240
<v Speaker 2>him Jeffy. Jackie loves that ETF and I likes JEFFQ.

0:12:51.200 --> 0:12:54.480
<v Speaker 2>But I think what the yield Max and yield Boost

0:12:54.480 --> 0:12:56.599
<v Speaker 2>people did to say, oh, that's an interesting idea, but

0:12:56.600 --> 0:12:59.040
<v Speaker 2>why don't we write calls right here? Or why don't

0:12:59.080 --> 0:13:01.360
<v Speaker 2>we do a straddle? And this is how the ETF

0:13:01.360 --> 0:13:05.240
<v Speaker 2>industry progresses. Like the first smart beta ETF was very general.

0:13:05.320 --> 0:13:08.920
<v Speaker 2>Let's wait by price to earnings and we're screened by that,

0:13:09.520 --> 0:13:11.560
<v Speaker 2>and then all of a sudden, you get ones that have, like,

0:13:11.720 --> 0:13:15.160
<v Speaker 2>you know, twenty five different criteria. Now, so when it

0:13:15.200 --> 0:13:18.520
<v Speaker 2>comes to these ETFs, I want to ask Todd a

0:13:18.600 --> 0:13:23.679
<v Speaker 2>question about this. If you buy Tesla Tesla tsly, that's

0:13:23.679 --> 0:13:25.640
<v Speaker 2>the one that writes call options just out of it,

0:13:27.400 --> 0:13:30.760
<v Speaker 2>are you making a call that Tesla won't go up

0:13:31.000 --> 0:13:33.160
<v Speaker 2>because you are giving up a lot of your I

0:13:33.160 --> 0:13:36.720
<v Speaker 2>mean almost all your upside so you do get this dividend,

0:13:37.280 --> 0:13:39.560
<v Speaker 2>so I guess you have to believe Tesla's not going

0:13:39.600 --> 0:13:41.720
<v Speaker 2>to go on some big run. And then the second

0:13:41.720 --> 0:13:45.920
<v Speaker 2>thing is dividends are taxes ordinary income. I was having

0:13:45.960 --> 0:13:49.440
<v Speaker 2>a conversation with someone says, actually might be more tax

0:13:49.480 --> 0:13:51.480
<v Speaker 2>efficient to take a stock you've held for a year

0:13:51.920 --> 0:13:55.520
<v Speaker 2>and just sell small increments of it and almost pretend

0:13:55.559 --> 0:13:58.240
<v Speaker 2>that's your dividend to be tax less. What do you

0:13:58.240 --> 0:13:59.080
<v Speaker 2>think about both those?

0:13:59.080 --> 0:13:59.320
<v Speaker 5>Todd?

0:14:00.840 --> 0:14:05.400
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, Well, so they have vehicles that they combine, you know,

0:14:05.520 --> 0:14:08.160
<v Speaker 3>you can combine with the test lead to get your upside,

0:14:08.240 --> 0:14:11.960
<v Speaker 3>like a t SLL. I don't know if that's granted shares,

0:14:12.000 --> 0:14:14.880
<v Speaker 3>but y'all were mentioning yield boost before, and so there

0:14:14.920 --> 0:14:17.640
<v Speaker 3>are vehicles that you can use to get your upside.

0:14:17.679 --> 0:14:20.280
<v Speaker 3>I mean me myself. I will buy a little bit

0:14:20.280 --> 0:14:24.440
<v Speaker 3>of Tesla stock or sell put options on Tesla to

0:14:24.520 --> 0:14:27.560
<v Speaker 3>get more upside appreciation and lower my risk a little

0:14:27.600 --> 0:14:29.960
<v Speaker 3>bit there, and then I'll buy test Lead just for

0:14:30.040 --> 0:14:34.640
<v Speaker 3>the income. And obviously my big thing at my channel

0:14:34.680 --> 0:14:37.800
<v Speaker 3>is I stick with the index. Is where Tesla is

0:14:37.800 --> 0:14:39.920
<v Speaker 3>a large part of let's say the nasadack, it's a

0:14:39.920 --> 0:14:42.920
<v Speaker 3>pretty good chunk of it. So I don't mind putting

0:14:43.200 --> 0:14:47.000
<v Speaker 3>the most the bulk of my money in things like Cornerstone,

0:14:47.040 --> 0:14:49.560
<v Speaker 3>which is you know, like JEPI is one of my

0:14:49.960 --> 0:14:52.160
<v Speaker 3>one of my favorites. That's a that's a crowd favorite.

0:14:52.200 --> 0:14:54.800
<v Speaker 3>It's more conservative, but Cornerstone was one of the first

0:14:54.880 --> 0:14:57.560
<v Speaker 3>ever you know, they've been around since the eighties. And

0:14:57.600 --> 0:15:00.320
<v Speaker 3>that's where I get a lot of my perform hormans.

0:15:00.360 --> 0:15:02.640
<v Speaker 3>That's index. So I don't have to reach reach for

0:15:02.720 --> 0:15:06.560
<v Speaker 3>a Tesla or any stock specific gains I can. I

0:15:06.560 --> 0:15:10.440
<v Speaker 3>can put it in something like a Cornerstone CRFCLM, and

0:15:10.480 --> 0:15:13.360
<v Speaker 3>then that gives me not only the index exposure that

0:15:13.400 --> 0:15:16.840
<v Speaker 3>I need, but it's it's a very unique, a very

0:15:16.920 --> 0:15:19.120
<v Speaker 3>unique fund. It has a twenty one percent dividend at

0:15:19.120 --> 0:15:22.360
<v Speaker 3>the NAV and it drips that dividend, and it drips

0:15:22.360 --> 0:15:25.160
<v Speaker 3>the twenty one percent divinitent down at NAV for free

0:15:25.240 --> 0:15:27.360
<v Speaker 3>money every month. As I always say, so it's you know,

0:15:27.480 --> 0:15:30.560
<v Speaker 3>if there's like an eighteen percent premium right now with

0:15:31.000 --> 0:15:34.080
<v Speaker 3>Cornerstone shares to its net asset value, So when you

0:15:34.120 --> 0:15:36.680
<v Speaker 3>drip that twenty one percent dividend, you're also getting that

0:15:36.800 --> 0:15:41.280
<v Speaker 3>premium gain every month, which is really, you know, really interesting,

0:15:41.320 --> 0:15:43.880
<v Speaker 3>and I don't know why more people don't discuss Cornerstone.

0:15:43.920 --> 0:15:47.360
<v Speaker 3>It's four star rated on morning Star five stars sometimes,

0:15:47.520 --> 0:15:50.400
<v Speaker 3>and so I instead of reaching for a tesla, I

0:15:50.480 --> 0:15:53.120
<v Speaker 3>go with the indexes and I go with things that

0:15:53.160 --> 0:15:57.440
<v Speaker 3>can help me get performance. Cornerstone moves. It has twenty

0:15:57.480 --> 0:16:00.600
<v Speaker 3>percent premiums on average, and it has a twenty percent

0:16:00.640 --> 0:16:03.040
<v Speaker 3>dividen and it drips it down at the NAV. So

0:16:03.120 --> 0:16:05.160
<v Speaker 3>I kind of get my oun performance that way, and

0:16:05.160 --> 0:16:07.480
<v Speaker 3>then I play it around It's Wright's offerings to really

0:16:07.560 --> 0:16:10.240
<v Speaker 3>level up my account. But then I have Cornerstone and

0:16:10.440 --> 0:16:12.320
<v Speaker 3>all these other funds that I mentioned, Rex Funds and

0:16:13.080 --> 0:16:16.160
<v Speaker 3>other funds like that. But as far as the taxes go,

0:16:16.360 --> 0:16:20.640
<v Speaker 3>Cornerstone is also a return of capital. So many of

0:16:20.640 --> 0:16:23.560
<v Speaker 3>these funds might be a return of capital, but Cornerstone,

0:16:23.600 --> 0:16:25.360
<v Speaker 3>if you don't sell those shares, you don't have to

0:16:25.360 --> 0:16:27.480
<v Speaker 3>pay taxes. So that's also how I get around the

0:16:27.520 --> 0:16:29.400
<v Speaker 3>taxes with you know, return of capital.

0:16:29.760 --> 0:16:31.720
<v Speaker 5>I want to jump in and say, just to be

0:16:31.800 --> 0:16:34.840
<v Speaker 5>super clear, like a lot of people will consider these

0:16:35.640 --> 0:16:40.600
<v Speaker 5>investments really really risky. And Eric, you mentioned that they

0:16:40.600 --> 0:16:44.240
<v Speaker 5>can trail. A lot of them trail they're underlying stock

0:16:44.320 --> 0:16:47.880
<v Speaker 5>or they're underlying index, So you know, you'll have like

0:16:47.920 --> 0:16:51.360
<v Speaker 5>the Tesla will just be underperforming by that much more

0:16:51.640 --> 0:16:55.080
<v Speaker 5>versus Tesla. Even during a year when Tesla is down

0:16:55.120 --> 0:16:58.120
<v Speaker 5>a lot, it'll be down even more. The same goes

0:16:58.200 --> 0:17:01.320
<v Speaker 5>for you know, the coinbase one we mentioned in the story,

0:17:01.480 --> 0:17:04.840
<v Speaker 5>and a lot of other ones for retail investors. For

0:17:04.840 --> 0:17:08.359
<v Speaker 5>a lot of retail investors, that might not matter. Maybe

0:17:08.400 --> 0:17:11.480
<v Speaker 5>they're more interested in getting that dividend income and less

0:17:11.480 --> 0:17:15.359
<v Speaker 5>interested in maybe it's just not as big of a

0:17:15.400 --> 0:17:19.040
<v Speaker 5>concern that something is underperforming. They want the dividend income.

0:17:19.520 --> 0:17:22.040
<v Speaker 5>But I just wanted to caveat that they really are

0:17:22.080 --> 0:17:25.639
<v Speaker 5>considered a lot of them are considered risky by you know,

0:17:25.680 --> 0:17:27.840
<v Speaker 5>the investment community, people who watch this space.

0:17:27.960 --> 0:17:30.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, no, doubt. I mean this is we have our

0:17:30.400 --> 0:17:33.600
<v Speaker 2>traffic light system. These would be yellow lights. They're not

0:17:33.680 --> 0:17:36.840
<v Speaker 2>quite red because there's no leverage involved. They're not rolling futures,

0:17:37.400 --> 0:17:40.000
<v Speaker 2>but you are. You got to really read the fine

0:17:40.000 --> 0:17:43.080
<v Speaker 2>print here and know what you're doing. I think something

0:17:43.119 --> 0:17:45.680
<v Speaker 2>like a two x tesla, though that is red light

0:17:45.800 --> 0:17:50.160
<v Speaker 2>because you could lose money quicker. These are a writing call.

0:17:50.240 --> 0:17:53.240
<v Speaker 2>It's just it's different. Once you add leverage into the mix,

0:17:53.840 --> 0:17:55.840
<v Speaker 2>then everything could go twice as fast up or down.

0:17:55.920 --> 0:18:00.199
<v Speaker 2>So I think that's where these are moderately risky. But

0:18:00.280 --> 0:18:05.199
<v Speaker 2>they're again I think Todd, you seem like you have

0:18:05.240 --> 0:18:07.840
<v Speaker 2>a plan for this. You like this sort of mixing

0:18:07.880 --> 0:18:11.040
<v Speaker 2>and the concoction of different things, and this is what

0:18:11.080 --> 0:18:13.800
<v Speaker 2>you like to do every day. So I think this

0:18:13.840 --> 0:18:16.520
<v Speaker 2>is the kind of template for like the kind of

0:18:16.560 --> 0:18:20.159
<v Speaker 2>retail trader because remember Joel we had, Remember we had

0:18:20.200 --> 0:18:23.199
<v Speaker 2>that guy on that nineteen year old who'd love to

0:18:23.240 --> 0:18:27.520
<v Speaker 2>trade sqqq and tqqq but he monitored all day.

0:18:27.760 --> 0:18:31.600
<v Speaker 1>It seems so long ago and quaint it does well.

0:18:31.640 --> 0:18:34.439
<v Speaker 2>Honestly, that's a lot of volatility, though that guy was

0:18:34.880 --> 0:18:37.719
<v Speaker 2>that's a whole other level. I think this is actually tamer.

0:18:37.760 --> 0:18:41.480
<v Speaker 2>But at some point, I think, Todd, let me ask

0:18:41.520 --> 0:18:44.000
<v Speaker 2>you this, like, you have fun trading, you do this

0:18:44.000 --> 0:18:47.720
<v Speaker 2>stuff like at some point you know, either you do

0:18:47.840 --> 0:18:50.639
<v Speaker 2>really well and you stick to it, or maybe you're like,

0:18:50.720 --> 0:18:55.119
<v Speaker 2>you know, actually, I'll just buy Tesla stock or the

0:18:55.200 --> 0:18:59.040
<v Speaker 2>cues and just not mess with this anymore. I do

0:18:59.119 --> 0:19:02.479
<v Speaker 2>think sometimes trade do come to that, But on the flip,

0:19:02.760 --> 0:19:05.240
<v Speaker 2>that's not as fun. And this is part of what

0:19:05.359 --> 0:19:08.879
<v Speaker 2>we call roe returnal entertainment because a lot of people

0:19:08.880 --> 0:19:10.480
<v Speaker 2>have a Core four one K. They can't touch it.

0:19:10.480 --> 0:19:12.200
<v Speaker 2>You got away thirty years for it to compound. It's

0:19:12.200 --> 0:19:14.720
<v Speaker 2>like watching paint dry. Actually it's watched like watching a

0:19:14.760 --> 0:19:17.400
<v Speaker 2>tree grow. You would go mental looking at it every day.

0:19:17.800 --> 0:19:19.639
<v Speaker 2>So they like to have fun with some stuff on

0:19:19.680 --> 0:19:21.879
<v Speaker 2>the side. Is that this for you or is this

0:19:22.000 --> 0:19:25.000
<v Speaker 2>like your whole nest egg? I guess. And how do

0:19:25.040 --> 0:19:27.320
<v Speaker 2>you feel about that idea of do you think you'll

0:19:27.320 --> 0:19:28.840
<v Speaker 2>someday come out the other end and be like, you

0:19:28.880 --> 0:19:31.560
<v Speaker 2>know what, I'll just buy the stock and wait thirty years.

0:19:32.160 --> 0:19:35.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I appreciate that question, Eric. You know, for me

0:19:35.400 --> 0:19:38.359
<v Speaker 3>it is it is fun to not have fomo because

0:19:39.080 --> 0:19:42.560
<v Speaker 3>when you're in the indexes You'll see other stocks kind

0:19:42.560 --> 0:19:44.640
<v Speaker 3>of jump up and you'll say, oh, man, I wish

0:19:44.720 --> 0:19:48.560
<v Speaker 3>I was in that stock. So what yield Max and

0:19:48.600 --> 0:19:50.600
<v Speaker 3>some of these funds do for me is they allow

0:19:50.640 --> 0:19:53.760
<v Speaker 3>me to not have fomo. I invest a very small amount,

0:19:53.880 --> 0:19:57.320
<v Speaker 3>and these kinds of vehicles like yield Max. I always say,

0:19:57.720 --> 0:20:00.120
<v Speaker 3>you know, if I have one hundred thousand dollars position

0:20:00.280 --> 0:20:02.560
<v Speaker 3>in this index over here, well then yield Max will

0:20:02.600 --> 0:20:05.040
<v Speaker 3>be like one or two thousand dollars of my dollars

0:20:05.280 --> 0:20:07.800
<v Speaker 3>towards the bottom of my portfolio. They just kind of

0:20:07.800 --> 0:20:10.359
<v Speaker 3>give a little bit of extra growth for me. The

0:20:10.400 --> 0:20:13.400
<v Speaker 3>whole name of the game is qualifying income. And when

0:20:13.400 --> 0:20:16.560
<v Speaker 3>you mentioned your trader that did SQQQ and t QQ,

0:20:17.119 --> 0:20:21.000
<v Speaker 3>I strangle those often. But my thing was the banks

0:20:21.000 --> 0:20:23.840
<v Speaker 3>didn't let me get my house with those gains. They

0:20:23.840 --> 0:20:26.639
<v Speaker 3>were two up and down. I needed dividends. So I

0:20:26.720 --> 0:20:29.639
<v Speaker 3>go with yield Max and all these other dividend funds

0:20:30.040 --> 0:20:33.639
<v Speaker 3>to give me the qualifying income I need to get

0:20:33.840 --> 0:20:36.680
<v Speaker 3>loans and to live free. And if I hold them

0:20:36.680 --> 0:20:39.200
<v Speaker 3>long enough again, they'll cash flow. And even though they're

0:20:39.240 --> 0:20:43.440
<v Speaker 3>down at the moment, they will eventually cash flow eventually,

0:20:43.600 --> 0:20:46.760
<v Speaker 3>And you know, I keep them so small to where

0:20:46.760 --> 0:20:48.840
<v Speaker 3>they don't even affect my performance. They just kind of

0:20:48.840 --> 0:20:51.560
<v Speaker 3>give me the fomo that i'm you know that I can,

0:20:51.920 --> 0:20:54.520
<v Speaker 3>I can take care of their and they give me

0:20:54.560 --> 0:20:57.280
<v Speaker 3>the qualifying income I need to live free from a

0:20:57.320 --> 0:20:57.840
<v Speaker 3>nine to five.

0:20:58.480 --> 0:21:00.600
<v Speaker 2>That is interesting, guy, It's a great anecdote touch.

0:21:00.840 --> 0:21:05.320
<v Speaker 1>So I'm so curious about that, toddic So just in general,

0:21:05.359 --> 0:21:08.040
<v Speaker 1>talk to us about how you approach a portfolio.

0:21:08.960 --> 0:21:11.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean every day I say it in my

0:21:11.720 --> 0:21:16.959
<v Speaker 3>videos to stay with the indexes. And obviously on my

0:21:17.000 --> 0:21:19.320
<v Speaker 3>about a million dollars invested in my account, we're up

0:21:19.359 --> 0:21:21.719
<v Speaker 3>thirty two percent for the year. Most of that is

0:21:21.720 --> 0:21:26.400
<v Speaker 3>because I anchor my portfolio to Cornerstone, and then I

0:21:26.440 --> 0:21:30.400
<v Speaker 3>anchor it next to Defiance and then round Hill because

0:21:30.480 --> 0:21:32.679
<v Speaker 3>Roundhill gives you some of the gains that move up

0:21:32.840 --> 0:21:36.400
<v Speaker 3>upward left right and you get the dividends. But Cornerstone

0:21:36.440 --> 0:21:39.520
<v Speaker 3>I always tout that one because it has the lowest maintenance,

0:21:39.720 --> 0:21:41.760
<v Speaker 3>which is another term. I don't know if y'all want

0:21:41.760 --> 0:21:44.160
<v Speaker 3>to get into that on this podcast, but in order

0:21:44.200 --> 0:21:45.720
<v Speaker 3>to withdraw out of your account, you need to have

0:21:45.800 --> 0:21:49.399
<v Speaker 3>low maintenance names, and Cornerstone is such high quality that

0:21:49.440 --> 0:21:51.880
<v Speaker 3>it's low maintenance, whereas a lot of yield Mac's names

0:21:51.880 --> 0:21:55.040
<v Speaker 3>are low quality, so they have high maintenance, so they

0:21:55.119 --> 0:21:57.280
<v Speaker 3>suck up all of your equity right off the bat.

0:21:57.920 --> 0:22:00.440
<v Speaker 3>So I tried to stay with low maintenance names that

0:22:00.480 --> 0:22:03.520
<v Speaker 3>are indexed near the top of my portfolio. Those give

0:22:03.560 --> 0:22:06.520
<v Speaker 3>me the compounding that I need because it's easier to

0:22:06.600 --> 0:22:10.119
<v Speaker 3>make ten if you have a million invested, it's easier

0:22:10.200 --> 0:22:13.639
<v Speaker 3>to make one hundred thousand on ten percent on a

0:22:13.720 --> 0:22:16.080
<v Speaker 3>ten percent gain then it is to invest one hundred

0:22:16.119 --> 0:22:18.560
<v Speaker 3>thousand and expect a double off of one hundred thousand.

0:22:18.800 --> 0:22:21.040
<v Speaker 3>So I'll let compounding do a lot of my work

0:22:21.080 --> 0:22:23.399
<v Speaker 3>for me. It takes care of my taxes because the

0:22:23.480 --> 0:22:26.080
<v Speaker 3>return of capital, it takes care of my risk. They

0:22:26.119 --> 0:22:29.440
<v Speaker 3>minimize my volatility. And then I just keep Yieldmac small

0:22:29.520 --> 0:22:32.399
<v Speaker 3>for the fun no fomo and to just give me

0:22:32.440 --> 0:22:35.399
<v Speaker 3>a little bit of extra qualifying income that then pays

0:22:35.440 --> 0:22:38.520
<v Speaker 3>down my margin as well, and then I'm getting extra

0:22:38.560 --> 0:22:40.960
<v Speaker 3>growth obviously by using the margin that we use in

0:22:41.000 --> 0:22:41.520
<v Speaker 3>my channel.

0:22:42.359 --> 0:22:44.680
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I think it's an interesting point that we discovered

0:22:44.760 --> 0:22:48.920
<v Speaker 4>during our reporting that a lot of those traders are

0:22:49.040 --> 0:22:53.480
<v Speaker 4>using those CTFs as part of their personal finances. Most

0:22:53.480 --> 0:22:56.440
<v Speaker 4>people are taking loans. You know, some of those things

0:22:56.440 --> 0:23:00.919
<v Speaker 4>are obviously quite risky, but I think a lot of

0:23:00.960 --> 0:23:04.240
<v Speaker 4>it goes back to the fire movement, people generating passive income.

0:23:04.680 --> 0:23:07.400
<v Speaker 4>So that's definitely a big force we're seeing on these

0:23:07.440 --> 0:23:11.600
<v Speaker 4>forums and people very excited. But then this goes back

0:23:11.640 --> 0:23:15.760
<v Speaker 4>to the bigger picture of like why this is happening now,

0:23:16.640 --> 0:23:20.159
<v Speaker 4>And in terms of regulation, there were a lot of changes.

0:23:20.200 --> 0:23:23.760
<v Speaker 4>There was the ETF through in twenty nineteen, the derivatives

0:23:23.760 --> 0:23:28.600
<v Speaker 4>through in twenty twenty, so before that we really didn't

0:23:28.640 --> 0:23:31.280
<v Speaker 4>have access to those products. We also saw the single

0:23:31.320 --> 0:23:34.760
<v Speaker 4>stock ETFs, which have impact both on the cover code.

0:23:34.800 --> 0:23:38.000
<v Speaker 4>We saw the biggest eels thanks to the single stock ETFs,

0:23:38.320 --> 0:23:41.280
<v Speaker 4>and we saw the biggest leverage and biggest volatility thanks

0:23:41.280 --> 0:23:45.719
<v Speaker 4>to those single stocktf So, you know, kind of wrapping

0:23:45.800 --> 0:23:49.360
<v Speaker 4>up around here about the fact that what we've seen

0:23:49.520 --> 0:23:52.280
<v Speaker 4>is something new, something that wasn't available to retail before.

0:23:52.760 --> 0:23:56.320
<v Speaker 4>Some people are conscious about that. We even spoke to

0:23:56.359 --> 0:23:59.280
<v Speaker 4>the SEC Advocate and they say they're worried about the

0:23:59.320 --> 0:24:02.800
<v Speaker 4>growing complex city at a time where retail traders are

0:24:02.800 --> 0:24:06.560
<v Speaker 4>so active, they're very interested in the space. The space

0:24:06.640 --> 0:24:09.480
<v Speaker 4>is growing so fast. So perhaps one important point to

0:24:09.520 --> 0:24:12.359
<v Speaker 4>think about it is like those products are often used.

0:24:13.119 --> 0:24:16.439
<v Speaker 4>You know, they have big impact on people's lives if

0:24:16.440 --> 0:24:19.560
<v Speaker 4>they're taken as a loan. And also this is something

0:24:19.960 --> 0:24:23.920
<v Speaker 4>kind of new in terms of access for retail traders.

0:24:31.040 --> 0:24:32.879
<v Speaker 2>Movie ratings, Joel, that solves all this.

0:24:33.640 --> 0:24:36.040
<v Speaker 1>Do you like, oh, these are lights? Yeah?

0:24:36.080 --> 0:24:38.320
<v Speaker 2>I know. I was not to do it because of copyright,

0:24:38.800 --> 0:24:42.200
<v Speaker 2>but movie ratings are perfect. It's like, oh, these yield

0:24:42.240 --> 0:24:46.600
<v Speaker 2>max is, they're PG thirteen. Okay, why well x y

0:24:46.760 --> 0:24:51.680
<v Speaker 2>Z or TSL two x TESLA that's our and then

0:24:52.119 --> 0:24:54.920
<v Speaker 2>there are a few beyond our. We won't go into those.

0:24:55.520 --> 0:24:59.679
<v Speaker 2>There's a lot of How about this leveraged VIX futures rollers,

0:25:00.240 --> 0:25:01.400
<v Speaker 2>that's the US.

0:25:03.119 --> 0:25:04.040
<v Speaker 1>That's a roller coaster.

0:25:04.640 --> 0:25:07.159
<v Speaker 5>Two x micro strategy.

0:25:06.920 --> 0:25:10.200
<v Speaker 2>Too, yeah, two x microst Well, honestly, you have to

0:25:10.240 --> 0:25:12.560
<v Speaker 2>have commodity futures rolling. The t VIX was the ultimate

0:25:12.560 --> 0:25:15.280
<v Speaker 2>because it was an ATN which has credit risk. It

0:25:15.400 --> 0:25:18.640
<v Speaker 2>rolled futures, and it was leveraged, and it was the VIX.

0:25:18.840 --> 0:25:21.160
<v Speaker 2>It was always going to go down to negative ninety

0:25:21.200 --> 0:25:26.639
<v Speaker 2>nine point nine percent. But I'm okay with this, Joel.

0:25:26.720 --> 0:25:28.880
<v Speaker 2>I feel like this is a big tent the industry.

0:25:29.320 --> 0:25:33.480
<v Speaker 2>The rapper is so malleable that they can really work

0:25:33.520 --> 0:25:35.520
<v Speaker 2>in a lot of ideas. Some of these are going

0:25:35.560 --> 0:25:38.000
<v Speaker 2>to solve real life problems. There will be a couple,

0:25:38.800 --> 0:25:41.160
<v Speaker 2>you know, spots where somebody who doesn't know what they're

0:25:41.200 --> 0:25:43.760
<v Speaker 2>doing steps into the wrong product, and that's that sucks.

0:25:44.160 --> 0:25:48.040
<v Speaker 2>So I think you need ratings, but ultimately get ready

0:25:48.040 --> 0:25:49.800
<v Speaker 2>for more of this. I mean, this is not going away.

0:25:49.840 --> 0:25:52.200
<v Speaker 2>I heard from someone the sec you know, the products

0:25:52.200 --> 0:25:54.439
<v Speaker 2>coming in and not just the yield Max but like

0:25:54.720 --> 0:25:58.320
<v Speaker 2>the buffer which are for older people conservative. Some of

0:25:58.320 --> 0:26:01.600
<v Speaker 2>those are getting really wonky and we're going to continue

0:26:01.600 --> 0:26:04.080
<v Speaker 2>to see a lot of derivative use. But most of

0:26:04.119 --> 0:26:08.240
<v Speaker 2>it I think will be pretty responsible. But there's definitely

0:26:08.280 --> 0:26:09.840
<v Speaker 2>gonna be the fun stuff trol. I mean, that's just

0:26:09.880 --> 0:26:11.280
<v Speaker 2>the it's always been this way.

0:26:12.720 --> 0:26:16.920
<v Speaker 1>Todd as somebody who is so intimate with the retail

0:26:17.160 --> 0:26:19.800
<v Speaker 1>crowd and the advice that you're giving to people on

0:26:20.200 --> 0:26:24.000
<v Speaker 1>YouTube curious, like, what do you recommend people understand about

0:26:24.000 --> 0:26:28.919
<v Speaker 1>the fine print in the perspectives while they're considering emulating

0:26:29.200 --> 0:26:30.320
<v Speaker 1>what you've been able to do.

0:26:31.040 --> 0:26:34.280
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely, I completely agree that there's a lot of risk

0:26:34.480 --> 0:26:38.240
<v Speaker 3>with these types of vehicles. So what I always say

0:26:38.480 --> 0:26:42.280
<v Speaker 3>is to make sure that you match these vehicles with

0:26:42.480 --> 0:26:46.640
<v Speaker 3>the percentage with the percentages that they are in the indexes.

0:26:46.720 --> 0:26:49.960
<v Speaker 3>So if you have Apple, which is ten percent of

0:26:50.000 --> 0:26:52.960
<v Speaker 3>the Nasdaq, or Microsoft, which is ten percent, then I

0:26:53.000 --> 0:26:58.080
<v Speaker 3>didn't mind having ten percent of my portfolio and MSFO

0:26:58.760 --> 0:27:01.240
<v Speaker 3>and that was doing really well. It was a nice,

0:27:01.280 --> 0:27:04.400
<v Speaker 3>steady gainer, and it was doing well until they had

0:27:04.480 --> 0:27:08.200
<v Speaker 3>maintenance changes. When they had maintenance changes, that sent shockwaves

0:27:08.720 --> 0:27:13.439
<v Speaker 3>throughout the communities because some people were prematurely margin called

0:27:13.560 --> 0:27:16.280
<v Speaker 3>just because of the maintenance change. So I would say

0:27:16.359 --> 0:27:19.520
<v Speaker 3>to keep them matched at no more than they are

0:27:19.720 --> 0:27:22.639
<v Speaker 3>as the as a percentage of what they traded in

0:27:22.840 --> 0:27:27.919
<v Speaker 3>the indexes. And also even with that, that's still that

0:27:27.920 --> 0:27:30.119
<v Speaker 3>could still be a lot of volatility in your account,

0:27:30.160 --> 0:27:34.080
<v Speaker 3>because you know, you just you want to stay indexed,

0:27:34.200 --> 0:27:36.560
<v Speaker 3>is what I always say. Keep them. If you're gonna

0:27:36.560 --> 0:27:38.879
<v Speaker 3>buy these, make sure they're no more than the percentages

0:27:38.920 --> 0:27:42.359
<v Speaker 3>that they're that they're represented in the indexes. But also

0:27:42.720 --> 0:27:45.240
<v Speaker 3>just stay indexed, you know, because ninety percent of traders

0:27:45.280 --> 0:27:48.600
<v Speaker 3>can't beat the S and P, and so stay indexed.

0:27:49.040 --> 0:27:52.800
<v Speaker 3>Keep these positions small and make them no more than

0:27:52.840 --> 0:27:54.560
<v Speaker 3>what they are represented in the indexes.

0:27:55.720 --> 0:27:58.639
<v Speaker 1>All right, on that note, we're going to wrap. Deniza,

0:27:58.960 --> 0:28:01.840
<v Speaker 1>Vildanna and Todd. Thank you so much for joining us

0:28:01.840 --> 0:28:02.400
<v Speaker 1>on Trillions.

0:28:02.840 --> 0:28:04.040
<v Speaker 3>Thank you so much for having me.

0:28:04.480 --> 0:28:06.000
<v Speaker 4>Thank you, thanks for having.

0:28:05.880 --> 0:28:09.280
<v Speaker 1>Us and that story. One hundred percent yields are fueling

0:28:09.280 --> 0:28:20.520
<v Speaker 1>a retail boom and new quickbook ets. Thanks for listening

0:28:20.520 --> 0:28:23.080
<v Speaker 1>to Trillions. Until next time. You can find us on

0:28:23.119 --> 0:28:28.240
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg terminal, Bloomberg dot com, Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or

0:28:28.280 --> 0:28:30.800
<v Speaker 1>wherever else we'd like to listen. We'd love to hear

0:28:30.800 --> 0:28:34.680
<v Speaker 1>from you. We're on Twitter, I'm at Joel webbershow He's

0:28:34.960 --> 0:28:39.200
<v Speaker 1>at Eric Aultness. This episode of Trillions was produced by

0:28:39.200 --> 0:28:41.280
<v Speaker 1>Magnus Hendrickson. Bye