WEBVTT - Smart Talks with IBM and Malcolm Gladwell - Couch vs. cubicle: is the future of work hybrid? 

0:00:04.080 --> 0:00:07.680
<v Speaker 1>Hello there. This is Smart Talks with IBM podcast from

0:00:07.680 --> 0:00:11.680
<v Speaker 1>Pushkin Industries. I Heart Media and IBM about what it

0:00:11.680 --> 0:00:14.520
<v Speaker 1>means to look at today's most challenging problems in a

0:00:14.520 --> 0:00:21.120
<v Speaker 1>new way. I'm Maltain Glombwell. Today I'm chatting with Adam Grant,

0:00:21.200 --> 0:00:25.079
<v Speaker 1>an organizational psychologist and professor at the Wharton School and

0:00:25.239 --> 0:00:28.440
<v Speaker 1>author of one of my favorite books, Think Again. He's

0:00:28.480 --> 0:00:32.320
<v Speaker 1>a longtime friend and I love to disagree with him. Well,

0:00:32.360 --> 0:00:35.760
<v Speaker 1>I hope you're wrong. I'm afraid you might be partially right,

0:00:36.320 --> 0:00:38.880
<v Speaker 1>which is as much as I can never acknowledge around

0:00:38.920 --> 0:00:41.960
<v Speaker 1>you being right. But uh, you always challenge me to

0:00:42.000 --> 0:00:45.479
<v Speaker 1>think again, which I thoroughly enjoy. This chat was a

0:00:45.520 --> 0:00:49.199
<v Speaker 1>part of ibm s Think Conference, where leading innovators talk

0:00:49.200 --> 0:00:53.279
<v Speaker 1>about technology that makes a difference and other intriguing conversations

0:00:53.560 --> 0:00:58.960
<v Speaker 1>with global perspectives. Let's dive in. You know, I are

0:00:59.120 --> 0:01:02.120
<v Speaker 1>going to have a conversation today about this moment that

0:01:02.200 --> 0:01:06.640
<v Speaker 1>we're in, about whether something transformational has happened in the

0:01:06.680 --> 0:01:11.240
<v Speaker 1>way we live and work and do not expects to agree.

0:01:11.920 --> 0:01:14.600
<v Speaker 1>We disagree on virtually everything, but it's always with an

0:01:14.680 --> 0:01:20.480
<v Speaker 1>undercurrent deeperfection. Adam, welcome, thank you. I don't know if

0:01:20.480 --> 0:01:22.520
<v Speaker 1>we actually disagree on everything, but I kind of like

0:01:22.640 --> 0:01:25.880
<v Speaker 1>the sound of that. It's always important to start on

0:01:26.680 --> 0:01:29.840
<v Speaker 1>to acknowledge the fact that there may be major riffs.

0:01:29.840 --> 0:01:33.360
<v Speaker 1>So you're so Canadian, but keep going. I am very Canadian.

0:01:33.520 --> 0:01:36.120
<v Speaker 1>So I'm going to confess that I may I would

0:01:36.120 --> 0:01:40.280
<v Speaker 1>describe myself as a pandemic skeptic. And I was a

0:01:40.280 --> 0:01:44.040
<v Speaker 1>pandemic skeptic at the very beginning of the pandemic. And

0:01:44.080 --> 0:01:45.880
<v Speaker 1>I'll define what I mean by the skeptic. At a

0:01:45.880 --> 0:01:48.400
<v Speaker 1>moment I wavered in the middle, and now I'm a

0:01:48.440 --> 0:01:51.960
<v Speaker 1>skeptic again. By pandemic skeptic, I mean I do not

0:01:52.160 --> 0:01:55.840
<v Speaker 1>expect the pandemic to radically change the way we work

0:01:56.400 --> 0:01:58.200
<v Speaker 1>or even live our lives. I think it's all going

0:01:58.240 --> 0:02:01.200
<v Speaker 1>to go away. Do where whe would you? Where would

0:02:01.200 --> 0:02:04.840
<v Speaker 1>you stand on that? On the continuum of radical transformation

0:02:04.880 --> 0:02:08.680
<v Speaker 1>at one end, radical skepticism on the other. Well, I

0:02:08.720 --> 0:02:12.160
<v Speaker 1>hope you're wrong. I'm afraid you might be partially ripe,

0:02:12.560 --> 0:02:15.080
<v Speaker 1>which is as much as I can never acknowledge around

0:02:15.160 --> 0:02:18.200
<v Speaker 1>you being right. But uh, you always challenge me to

0:02:18.240 --> 0:02:21.239
<v Speaker 1>think again, which I thoroughly enjoy. I think you know

0:02:21.280 --> 0:02:23.600
<v Speaker 1>that I've already started to see some real changes, right,

0:02:23.639 --> 0:02:26.800
<v Speaker 1>So let's go back to winter. I went to a

0:02:26.840 --> 0:02:29.200
<v Speaker 1>bunch of CEOs and startup founders and said, I think

0:02:29.200 --> 0:02:31.280
<v Speaker 1>the future of work might be hybrid. Let's do a

0:02:31.320 --> 0:02:34.079
<v Speaker 1>remote Friday experiment where people have one day a week

0:02:34.120 --> 0:02:36.880
<v Speaker 1>to work from anywhere. And every single leader I pitch

0:02:36.960 --> 0:02:38.919
<v Speaker 1>turned me down. They said, we don't want to open

0:02:38.919 --> 0:02:41.680
<v Speaker 1>Pandora's box. We think people will procrastinate constantly and our

0:02:41.720 --> 0:02:44.120
<v Speaker 1>culture is going to fall apart. And a lot of

0:02:44.120 --> 0:02:46.720
<v Speaker 1>those CEOs have started rethinking, right. Some of them announced

0:02:46.760 --> 0:02:49.320
<v Speaker 1>they're going to be permanently remote, many others are at

0:02:49.400 --> 0:02:52.280
<v Speaker 1>least rolling out hybrid plans. And so I don't think

0:02:52.320 --> 0:02:54.880
<v Speaker 1>the flexibility is going away, right. They've realized now I

0:02:54.880 --> 0:02:57.520
<v Speaker 1>can hire anywhere, I don't have to maintain a really

0:02:57.520 --> 0:03:01.400
<v Speaker 1>expensive giant headquarters office necessarily. And I've got to imagine

0:03:01.440 --> 0:03:03.640
<v Speaker 1>that some companies, especially when you look at the National

0:03:03.639 --> 0:03:06.600
<v Speaker 1>Survey data suggesting that most people are expecting to work

0:03:06.600 --> 0:03:08.760
<v Speaker 1>two days a week from home, and most companies are

0:03:08.800 --> 0:03:11.600
<v Speaker 1>encouraging that. That seems like something that's going to change,

0:03:11.680 --> 0:03:15.160
<v Speaker 1>don't you think, well? I yes, and no, um I

0:03:15.160 --> 0:03:17.239
<v Speaker 1>feel like there was obviously a steady push in that

0:03:17.400 --> 0:03:20.880
<v Speaker 1>direction over the last fifteen years or so. But my

0:03:21.040 --> 0:03:24.720
<v Speaker 1>I have some specific questions. So the first will be

0:03:24.760 --> 0:03:28.240
<v Speaker 1>young people. My sense from the young people who work

0:03:28.320 --> 0:03:32.040
<v Speaker 1>at my company and my memories of my own thinking

0:03:32.040 --> 0:03:34.320
<v Speaker 1>when I was in my twenties was that going to

0:03:34.400 --> 0:03:39.560
<v Speaker 1>the office was the single most exciting thing in my week. Right.

0:03:41.400 --> 0:03:44.840
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to meet, I was new, I wanted to learn.

0:03:45.080 --> 0:03:47.440
<v Speaker 1>When I was at the Washington Post, I was ten

0:03:47.520 --> 0:03:51.160
<v Speaker 1>ft from Bob Woodward, the greatest reporter of my generation,

0:03:51.240 --> 0:03:53.400
<v Speaker 1>was ten ft away. I knew nothing about reporting. He

0:03:53.480 --> 0:03:57.200
<v Speaker 1>knew everything. And I used to sit and watch him

0:03:57.400 --> 0:04:01.280
<v Speaker 1>and listen, and I learned so much from that. Next

0:04:01.280 --> 0:04:05.920
<v Speaker 1>to me was a guy named Michaelisakoff, another legendary investigate reporter.

0:04:06.240 --> 0:04:08.400
<v Speaker 1>He was next to me. I would sit and listen,

0:04:08.880 --> 0:04:11.240
<v Speaker 1>and I understood that the only way I would get

0:04:11.400 --> 0:04:14.920
<v Speaker 1>I would learn that way was to go to the office, right,

0:04:15.400 --> 0:04:16.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean, there was just no reason not to go

0:04:17.000 --> 0:04:19.160
<v Speaker 1>to the office. No, do I feel the same way now?

0:04:19.160 --> 0:04:22.640
<v Speaker 1>It kick me seven, No, I don't. But if you're

0:04:22.640 --> 0:04:26.000
<v Speaker 1>a company that employs young people, can you really hire

0:04:26.040 --> 0:04:28.640
<v Speaker 1>the best and brightest young people by saying we're going

0:04:28.720 --> 0:04:30.880
<v Speaker 1>to have you work out of your apartment or a

0:04:31.000 --> 0:04:37.880
<v Speaker 1>Starbucks seems nuts to me. No, I don't think you can.

0:04:38.000 --> 0:04:39.520
<v Speaker 1>But I also don't think you're gonna get the best

0:04:39.520 --> 0:04:41.479
<v Speaker 1>and brightest young people by saying you have to be

0:04:41.520 --> 0:04:43.640
<v Speaker 1>in the office every day and we're going to measure

0:04:44.080 --> 0:04:46.880
<v Speaker 1>not your results, not your contribution, but the amount of

0:04:46.920 --> 0:04:49.800
<v Speaker 1>FaceTime that you contribute. That seems ridiculous. And I hope

0:04:49.839 --> 0:04:52.920
<v Speaker 1>that that's one thing that the pandemic erased. I think

0:04:53.200 --> 0:04:55.160
<v Speaker 1>you know we I guess we have precedent for this

0:04:55.200 --> 0:04:59.000
<v Speaker 1>in some ways. So think about what Ricardo similar did

0:04:58.960 --> 0:05:02.159
<v Speaker 1>at Semco as an interesting example, right, originally in Brazil

0:05:02.279 --> 0:05:06.840
<v Speaker 1>now in Twentiesome countries, very traditional manufacturing company. They say

0:05:06.960 --> 0:05:09.320
<v Speaker 1>we will let you buy back one day a week

0:05:09.640 --> 0:05:12.200
<v Speaker 1>for ten percent of your salary. And they're thinking, this

0:05:12.240 --> 0:05:14.880
<v Speaker 1>is an early retirement move that will, you know, appeal

0:05:14.920 --> 0:05:16.680
<v Speaker 1>to the baby boomers who say, all right, I want

0:05:16.680 --> 0:05:18.919
<v Speaker 1>to enjoy a day a week of retirement before I

0:05:18.960 --> 0:05:22.320
<v Speaker 1>get really old. But no, it's most popular among their

0:05:22.360 --> 0:05:25.000
<v Speaker 1>youngest employees in their twenties and thirties, who want that

0:05:25.120 --> 0:05:27.040
<v Speaker 1>day of freedom. And I think this is gonna be

0:05:27.080 --> 0:05:29.839
<v Speaker 1>a competitive advantage for companies moving forward. Right, the organizations

0:05:29.839 --> 0:05:31.200
<v Speaker 1>that are willing to give you that little bit of

0:05:31.240 --> 0:05:34.320
<v Speaker 1>flexibility are going to do a much better job attracting, motivating,

0:05:34.320 --> 0:05:36.520
<v Speaker 1>and retaining people than the ones that say you have

0:05:36.600 --> 0:05:39.159
<v Speaker 1>to be here all the time. Well so, but there's

0:05:39.200 --> 0:05:43.480
<v Speaker 1>two things we're talking about here. One is workplace flexibility

0:05:43.960 --> 0:05:48.520
<v Speaker 1>and the other is dislocation, right, remote work, And they're

0:05:48.640 --> 0:05:51.680
<v Speaker 1>very they're quite separate. So I am quite in fact,

0:05:51.720 --> 0:05:54.760
<v Speaker 1>I practice flexibility, have been breaxting it for years and

0:05:54.800 --> 0:05:56.240
<v Speaker 1>years and years. I love the oppoe. I don't go

0:05:56.240 --> 0:05:58.479
<v Speaker 1>into the oppice every day, nor do I expect all

0:05:58.480 --> 0:06:00.880
<v Speaker 1>of our employees to come in every day at the

0:06:00.920 --> 0:06:04.159
<v Speaker 1>same time. For certain key events, like in my for

0:06:04.240 --> 0:06:07.080
<v Speaker 1>a podcast, The crucial moment in the creation of one

0:06:07.080 --> 0:06:10.040
<v Speaker 1>of my episodes of the Revisionist History is the table read,

0:06:10.640 --> 0:06:13.680
<v Speaker 1>where we reenact the podcast that we're working on. I

0:06:13.760 --> 0:06:16.159
<v Speaker 1>read the narration and we play the tape. I have

0:06:16.200 --> 0:06:19.640
<v Speaker 1>a team of six people and we've been doing those

0:06:19.640 --> 0:06:22.719
<v Speaker 1>on zoom and I'm sorry it doesn't work on zoom

0:06:22.760 --> 0:06:25.960
<v Speaker 1>And I actually said and to our staff, the minute

0:06:25.960 --> 0:06:28.520
<v Speaker 1>we're all vaccinated, we are meeting again in person. Because

0:06:29.080 --> 0:06:32.400
<v Speaker 1>this is creative work. It can't be done. I need

0:06:32.480 --> 0:06:35.640
<v Speaker 1>your feedback in the room. I doesn't work on Zoom,

0:06:35.640 --> 0:06:40.279
<v Speaker 1>so that you know that idea. I don't mind the flexibility.

0:06:40.360 --> 0:06:43.720
<v Speaker 1>But if someone said to me, I'm in Denver, Colorado,

0:06:43.800 --> 0:06:46.120
<v Speaker 1>and I'm your producer and I'm going to work from

0:06:46.160 --> 0:06:48.120
<v Speaker 1>Denver for now, and I say you can't work endever,

0:06:48.240 --> 0:06:50.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry, you can't. You need to be unless you're

0:06:50.720 --> 0:06:53.320
<v Speaker 1>willing to fly in two days a week and then

0:06:53.440 --> 0:06:55.839
<v Speaker 1>fly back, fly into New York and fly back. It

0:06:55.839 --> 0:06:59.919
<v Speaker 1>doesn't work. Malcolm Gladwell, you are one of the smartest

0:07:00.080 --> 0:07:03.559
<v Speaker 1>and most creative people I know, and yet you can't

0:07:03.560 --> 0:07:06.200
<v Speaker 1>bring yourself to imagine doing a table read for a

0:07:06.200 --> 0:07:10.680
<v Speaker 1>product that's audio only without seeing people's faces, when you

0:07:10.680 --> 0:07:14.040
<v Speaker 1>yourself wrote in talking to Strangers that we overrate seeing

0:07:14.040 --> 0:07:19.360
<v Speaker 1>people's faces. No, no, no, I don't interesting interesting. Why

0:07:19.400 --> 0:07:21.160
<v Speaker 1>do I need them in the room when I'm doing

0:07:21.160 --> 0:07:23.040
<v Speaker 1>a table read? I need them in the room because

0:07:23.840 --> 0:07:27.760
<v Speaker 1>it's imperfect. So I'm creating a product for audio, but

0:07:27.800 --> 0:07:31.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm only in round one of what will be four rounds,

0:07:31.440 --> 0:07:33.760
<v Speaker 1>and I mean I'm handing in something that is very

0:07:33.840 --> 0:07:37.760
<v Speaker 1>much your work in progress. I need immediate, high quality

0:07:37.840 --> 0:07:42.560
<v Speaker 1>feedback B. I have found I also need my entire

0:07:42.640 --> 0:07:45.160
<v Speaker 1>team to pipe up. And I have found that people's

0:07:45.200 --> 0:07:48.400
<v Speaker 1>responses are inhibited online and that doesn't work for me.

0:07:48.800 --> 0:07:51.640
<v Speaker 1>I need everyone I want to say, I want to

0:07:51.920 --> 0:07:56.000
<v Speaker 1>I keep telling them that this, even dumb comments are useful,

0:07:56.600 --> 0:07:58.960
<v Speaker 1>and I feel, I feel maybe this is incorrect. I

0:07:59.000 --> 0:08:04.000
<v Speaker 1>feel that on Zoom people are editing themselves more and

0:08:04.760 --> 0:08:08.960
<v Speaker 1>even one when I'm doing a table read, one comment,

0:08:09.160 --> 0:08:12.640
<v Speaker 1>even a dumb comment, can be transformational in the final script,

0:08:13.200 --> 0:08:16.280
<v Speaker 1>so I can't afford closing their mouth when they should

0:08:16.280 --> 0:08:20.240
<v Speaker 1>open it. I accept the whole premise. I think all

0:08:20.280 --> 0:08:22.560
<v Speaker 1>of it makes sense, except the basic idea that you

0:08:22.600 --> 0:08:25.800
<v Speaker 1>can't create the psychological safety you're looking for, that freedom

0:08:25.800 --> 0:08:28.400
<v Speaker 1>to take risks and point out problems and that ideas fly.

0:08:29.040 --> 0:08:31.680
<v Speaker 1>That you can't create that in an online environment. So

0:08:31.800 --> 0:08:33.800
<v Speaker 1>let me throw out a couple examples of how I

0:08:33.800 --> 0:08:40.160
<v Speaker 1>think this works. First of all, adm Adam position healed myself.

0:08:40.760 --> 0:08:42.280
<v Speaker 1>Are you trying to tell me that you're gonna give

0:08:42.360 --> 0:08:44.280
<v Speaker 1>up on teaching in person now that you so in

0:08:44.360 --> 0:08:47.199
<v Speaker 1>love with online that Wharton is gonna go going to

0:08:47.280 --> 0:08:49.800
<v Speaker 1>turn into a digital platform. Is that what you're saying.

0:08:50.400 --> 0:08:53.280
<v Speaker 1>That's exactly where I was not going, but sort of going.

0:08:55.880 --> 0:08:57.200
<v Speaker 1>Let me say a couple of things here. The first

0:08:57.240 --> 0:08:59.720
<v Speaker 1>one is that I just came from a table read

0:09:00.040 --> 0:09:02.640
<v Speaker 1>a work life episode that we did over zoom, and

0:09:02.760 --> 0:09:05.240
<v Speaker 1>I got better feedback than we did when we did

0:09:05.240 --> 0:09:08.120
<v Speaker 1>these face to face, because we know that you you

0:09:08.160 --> 0:09:10.920
<v Speaker 1>know the science of brainstorming right in group brainstorming, and

0:09:10.960 --> 0:09:13.200
<v Speaker 1>this is true in group feedback too. You run into

0:09:13.240 --> 0:09:15.120
<v Speaker 1>production blocking where we can all talk it once and

0:09:15.160 --> 0:09:17.680
<v Speaker 1>you lose ideas. You run into ego threat where people

0:09:17.679 --> 0:09:19.800
<v Speaker 1>are worried they're gonna get judged and we lose ideas,

0:09:19.960 --> 0:09:23.040
<v Speaker 1>and you run in into conformity where the hippo that's you,

0:09:23.120 --> 0:09:25.640
<v Speaker 1>the highest paid person's opinion. As soon as that's known,

0:09:25.679 --> 0:09:28.679
<v Speaker 1>we all jump on the bandwagon. And we know that

0:09:28.720 --> 0:09:30.960
<v Speaker 1>if you can give people multiple channels for voicing their

0:09:30.960 --> 0:09:33.760
<v Speaker 1>independent ideas, they're better off. There is a chat window

0:09:33.800 --> 0:09:36.160
<v Speaker 1>and zoom. I don't know if you're tech savvy enough

0:09:36.240 --> 0:09:39.640
<v Speaker 1>to have discovered it yet, but I will tell you

0:09:39.679 --> 0:09:43.920
<v Speaker 1>that I have had both in teaching online and also

0:09:44.120 --> 0:09:47.120
<v Speaker 1>in the group table reads of my podcast and in

0:09:47.600 --> 0:09:49.839
<v Speaker 1>actually getting feedback from my students on the early drafts

0:09:49.840 --> 0:09:53.320
<v Speaker 1>of Think Again, I have had more honest and more

0:09:53.520 --> 0:09:55.920
<v Speaker 1>i would say, diverse comments than I've ever gotten before

0:09:55.960 --> 0:09:58.360
<v Speaker 1>because there are all these people who would not speak

0:09:58.400 --> 0:10:00.439
<v Speaker 1>up out loud, but we have this very the active

0:10:00.480 --> 0:10:03.360
<v Speaker 1>chat window going, and it allows me to get everybody's

0:10:03.400 --> 0:10:06.680
<v Speaker 1>participation in. So, no, I don't want to leave teaching

0:10:07.040 --> 0:10:10.640
<v Speaker 1>online only, but I would sure love, like I've been

0:10:10.640 --> 0:10:13.280
<v Speaker 1>able to do online, to call on someone who's gonna

0:10:13.320 --> 0:10:15.720
<v Speaker 1>bring up a relevant point or debate me on something,

0:10:15.920 --> 0:10:18.080
<v Speaker 1>as opposed to the random hand that happens to be

0:10:18.160 --> 0:10:21.280
<v Speaker 1>willing to speak, which is usually a white male extrovert

0:10:21.440 --> 0:10:23.400
<v Speaker 1>and least likely to be the person that I want

0:10:23.400 --> 0:10:31.600
<v Speaker 1>to learn from. Uh you know so, No, No, I'm not.

0:10:31.760 --> 0:10:34.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm saying you and I are probably an agreement in

0:10:34.880 --> 0:10:38.080
<v Speaker 1>the sense that I have that mode as well. So

0:10:39.240 --> 0:10:42.280
<v Speaker 1>as we go through the drafts of my episodes, we

0:10:42.440 --> 0:10:45.440
<v Speaker 1>move from an in person to an online thing and

0:10:45.520 --> 0:10:48.320
<v Speaker 1>people weigh in editor's way, and it's a it's a

0:10:48.320 --> 0:10:50.320
<v Speaker 1>Google dog. People can make all the comments they want

0:10:50.360 --> 0:10:53.520
<v Speaker 1>and they do, so I have that I'm just saying

0:10:53.520 --> 0:10:56.880
<v Speaker 1>there's a particular moment in the creative process where the

0:10:57.040 --> 0:11:00.640
<v Speaker 1>room and the energy in the room is important to

0:11:00.840 --> 0:11:05.600
<v Speaker 1>measure and to feed off. But wait before you leave that,

0:11:06.000 --> 0:11:07.600
<v Speaker 1>Before you leave that, I think, I think that's an

0:11:07.600 --> 0:11:11.040
<v Speaker 1>important distinction to make here. Um. I think, so you're

0:11:11.040 --> 0:11:13.760
<v Speaker 1>talking about what Anita Wolley would call it burstinus, right,

0:11:13.840 --> 0:11:16.360
<v Speaker 1>that sense that the room is literally bursting with energy

0:11:16.400 --> 0:11:19.560
<v Speaker 1>and ideas. And I don't know how to recreate that online. Right.

0:11:19.600 --> 0:11:21.439
<v Speaker 1>I feel like we're violating one of the laws of

0:11:21.480 --> 0:11:24.400
<v Speaker 1>thermodynamics every time I have a zoom session where I

0:11:24.440 --> 0:11:27.520
<v Speaker 1>put in a ton of energy unless comes back. And

0:11:27.559 --> 0:11:29.920
<v Speaker 1>I think that part is very hard to replicate in

0:11:29.960 --> 0:11:32.440
<v Speaker 1>the online environment. But I think sometimes the flow of

0:11:32.440 --> 0:11:37.000
<v Speaker 1>ideas is still worth it. Yeah. The second and more

0:11:37.080 --> 0:11:40.800
<v Speaker 1>important point, though, is about fun. So I have had,

0:11:41.240 --> 0:11:43.679
<v Speaker 1>You've had more conversations, but I've had, you know, a

0:11:43.720 --> 0:11:46.640
<v Speaker 1>lot of conversations with college kids over the last year,

0:11:47.200 --> 0:11:50.840
<v Speaker 1>and I have yet to find a single college kid

0:11:51.080 --> 0:11:53.880
<v Speaker 1>who found the last year more pleasurable than the year

0:11:53.920 --> 0:11:56.640
<v Speaker 1>before it? Right? Or high school kids? They all hate it?

0:11:57.000 --> 0:11:59.600
<v Speaker 1>Why do they hate it? Because it's not as fun now?

0:11:59.640 --> 0:12:03.600
<v Speaker 1>I just the same is true of employees. Sure, even

0:12:03.640 --> 0:12:06.960
<v Speaker 1>if you convinced me that Zoom was a more efficient

0:12:06.960 --> 0:12:11.880
<v Speaker 1>way to get feedback from my employees. You cannot convince

0:12:11.920 --> 0:12:15.880
<v Speaker 1>me that they're enjoying it more. And ultimately, if they're

0:12:15.880 --> 0:12:19.640
<v Speaker 1>not enjoying their jobs, we're doomed as a company. As

0:12:19.679 --> 0:12:22.720
<v Speaker 1>simple as that. The whole point, the founding principle of

0:12:22.800 --> 0:12:26.760
<v Speaker 1>Pushkin Industries, from the moment this company was I'm now

0:12:26.960 --> 0:12:28.360
<v Speaker 1>talking about my company that I started two and a

0:12:28.400 --> 0:12:30.920
<v Speaker 1>half years ago. Jacob and I when we sat down

0:12:30.920 --> 0:12:33.079
<v Speaker 1>to start the company, we were like, we're gonna make

0:12:33.080 --> 0:12:37.520
<v Speaker 1>cool things. Number two, We're going to have fun, right

0:12:37.920 --> 0:12:40.320
<v Speaker 1>and if everything is online, it's not fun. And as

0:12:40.360 --> 0:12:43.280
<v Speaker 1>far as I'm concerned, we've failed. I want to have fun.

0:12:43.480 --> 0:12:46.400
<v Speaker 1>Is that wrong? Why are you? Why are you standing

0:12:46.400 --> 0:12:49.680
<v Speaker 1>in the way of my enjoyment and my employees enjoyment.

0:12:51.040 --> 0:12:53.319
<v Speaker 1>I'm standing in the way of your enjoyment because you

0:12:53.360 --> 0:12:55.720
<v Speaker 1>would never be allowed to run a company. Can you?

0:12:55.800 --> 0:12:58.880
<v Speaker 1>Can you imagine Malcolm Gladwell, see, yeah, like you know what,

0:12:58.880 --> 0:13:01.240
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna make cool stuff. It almost as important as

0:13:01.280 --> 0:13:03.000
<v Speaker 1>we're going to have a lot of fun. That would

0:13:03.040 --> 0:13:06.000
<v Speaker 1>never work. Well Street would laugh you out of your

0:13:06.040 --> 0:13:08.800
<v Speaker 1>job in a day. Wait, wait wait, wait, wait, wait,

0:13:08.800 --> 0:13:12.760
<v Speaker 1>hold on, hold on, Adam, in the course, don't count

0:13:12.760 --> 0:13:16.880
<v Speaker 1>pandemic here in how many years have you been teaching teaching?

0:13:17.040 --> 0:13:20.280
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, fifteen maybe, Okay. Do you have fun

0:13:20.320 --> 0:13:24.720
<v Speaker 1>doing it? Of course that's part of the fun. Hold on,

0:13:24.720 --> 0:13:28.439
<v Speaker 1>hold on, hold on. If you didn't have fun doing it,

0:13:29.120 --> 0:13:34.000
<v Speaker 1>would you have left your job as professor by this point? No,

0:13:34.120 --> 0:13:36.480
<v Speaker 1>because I think it's meaningful and I'd rather bet on

0:13:36.559 --> 0:13:39.320
<v Speaker 1>purpose than pleasure. You would have gritted it out for

0:13:39.400 --> 0:13:43.720
<v Speaker 1>fifteen years, even though it's like every morning like, oh

0:13:43.720 --> 0:13:45.440
<v Speaker 1>do I have to do this again? And you would

0:13:45.440 --> 0:13:48.520
<v Speaker 1>have like looked at your wife and she said, Adam,

0:13:48.559 --> 0:13:51.840
<v Speaker 1>there's no way around it. Just grab your hard hat

0:13:51.880 --> 0:13:54.680
<v Speaker 1>and go off to the salt mines. Please, I'm not

0:13:54.760 --> 0:13:56.840
<v Speaker 1>buying it. You would have got because a million other

0:13:56.920 --> 0:13:58.720
<v Speaker 1>things you could have done that that could have made

0:13:58.720 --> 0:14:00.200
<v Speaker 1>you a good living, that you could have found fun.

0:14:00.200 --> 0:14:03.959
<v Speaker 1>You would not have stayed a professor. It wasn't fun. Okay.

0:14:03.960 --> 0:14:06.319
<v Speaker 1>Maybe it depends on how you define fun. So I'm

0:14:06.320 --> 0:14:08.840
<v Speaker 1>thinking now of Dan Coyle's distinction between deep fun and

0:14:08.840 --> 0:14:11.320
<v Speaker 1>shallow fund, and when you stay fun, I'm thinking about

0:14:11.320 --> 0:14:13.280
<v Speaker 1>shallow fund, which is you know, we're going to go

0:14:13.320 --> 0:14:15.839
<v Speaker 1>and party and we're basically going to revert to our

0:14:15.880 --> 0:14:18.440
<v Speaker 1>college selves. That is not my idea of fun. My

0:14:18.480 --> 0:14:20.920
<v Speaker 1>idea of fund is deep fund, which is we're working

0:14:20.960 --> 0:14:25.080
<v Speaker 1>on hard, interesting problems. Sometimes we laugh, sometimes we're you know,

0:14:25.080 --> 0:14:27.080
<v Speaker 1>we're really puzzled and confused, and we're trying to get

0:14:27.080 --> 0:14:29.480
<v Speaker 1>to the bottom of an important question. And I think

0:14:29.480 --> 0:14:31.080
<v Speaker 1>you can have that kind of deep fund in a

0:14:31.160 --> 0:14:33.520
<v Speaker 1>virtual world. In fact, it's the same kind of deep

0:14:33.560 --> 0:14:35.320
<v Speaker 1>fund that I have when I'm writing books, and I

0:14:35.360 --> 0:14:37.680
<v Speaker 1>think you have it too. Isn't that fun? Are you

0:14:37.720 --> 0:14:39.880
<v Speaker 1>saying that the time you spend sitting in front of

0:14:39.880 --> 0:14:42.960
<v Speaker 1>your computer writing New Yorker articles and best selling books

0:14:43.280 --> 0:14:48.880
<v Speaker 1>is not fun? It is. It is fun, but there's

0:14:48.920 --> 0:14:54.240
<v Speaker 1>a lot. So let me tell you about a conversation

0:14:54.240 --> 0:14:56.040
<v Speaker 1>I had this weekend with an old college friend of

0:14:56.040 --> 0:15:00.400
<v Speaker 1>mine who's now uh he's a senior this trade or

0:15:00.480 --> 0:15:04.640
<v Speaker 1>a big hospital system, very large hospital system, and he

0:15:05.320 --> 0:15:07.480
<v Speaker 1>was talking about what the last year has been like

0:15:08.080 --> 0:15:10.680
<v Speaker 1>and also every time I've seen him, but over the

0:15:10.720 --> 0:15:14.400
<v Speaker 1>last five years he has registered a long complaint about

0:15:14.400 --> 0:15:19.240
<v Speaker 1>electronic medical records, which are part of this conversation, right

0:15:19.520 --> 0:15:22.040
<v Speaker 1>so as his rule has gotten more digital. He will

0:15:22.040 --> 0:15:24.880
<v Speaker 1>tell you he's now in charge of he's the chief

0:15:24.920 --> 0:15:27.800
<v Speaker 1>well being officer for his hospital system, and they have

0:15:27.840 --> 0:15:31.320
<v Speaker 1>a serious problem with morale in their ranks. He will

0:15:31.360 --> 0:15:33.440
<v Speaker 1>be the first to tell you this. Why do they

0:15:33.440 --> 0:15:37.480
<v Speaker 1>have a serious problem with him? Among other reasons, because

0:15:38.160 --> 0:15:41.760
<v Speaker 1>the people entered the profession to do something and have

0:15:41.800 --> 0:15:45.120
<v Speaker 1>an experience that they're not having anymore. My friend can

0:15:45.400 --> 0:15:48.520
<v Speaker 1>decontrack when people are online late at night doing their

0:15:49.320 --> 0:15:52.360
<v Speaker 1>electronic medical record and they're they're logging on eleven at

0:15:52.480 --> 0:15:55.760
<v Speaker 1>night two and it's just not He's like, that's the

0:15:55.840 --> 0:15:58.400
<v Speaker 1>death of I'm not gonna be able to retain those people.

0:15:58.400 --> 0:16:00.440
<v Speaker 1>They're not going to do good work. They're gonna turn out.

0:16:00.920 --> 0:16:04.920
<v Speaker 1>That's the daily reality of his job, is that they're

0:16:04.960 --> 0:16:07.160
<v Speaker 1>trying to do something very important in society, and the

0:16:07.200 --> 0:16:10.800
<v Speaker 1>people who are charged with doing that are not enjoying themselves.

0:16:11.320 --> 0:16:14.320
<v Speaker 1>What do they enjoy? They enjoy sitting down and getting

0:16:14.320 --> 0:16:18.120
<v Speaker 1>to know a patient. That's why they became doctors, right,

0:16:18.800 --> 0:16:21.360
<v Speaker 1>and so this last year when everything's been done really

0:16:21.440 --> 0:16:26.320
<v Speaker 1>has been hell. Correctly, that's not why they became physicians.

0:16:27.000 --> 0:16:29.240
<v Speaker 1>So like, they're not gonna want to do we want

0:16:29.240 --> 0:16:31.600
<v Speaker 1>to continue this for them. No, there'll be no one

0:16:31.680 --> 0:16:35.000
<v Speaker 1>left in the hospitals to cure patients, give them their

0:16:35.040 --> 0:16:38.240
<v Speaker 1>patients back, because that's the deep fund is gone when

0:16:38.240 --> 0:16:40.560
<v Speaker 1>they're on computers all their love. Yeah, I think we're

0:16:40.560 --> 0:16:43.880
<v Speaker 1>in strong alignment there. I definitely do not want to

0:16:43.920 --> 0:16:46.040
<v Speaker 1>take somebody who got into a profession to help people

0:16:46.080 --> 0:16:48.960
<v Speaker 1>and say you're going to spend of your time entering

0:16:49.000 --> 0:16:52.320
<v Speaker 1>information and electronic medical records. But I think that's the

0:16:52.400 --> 0:16:56.080
<v Speaker 1>presence of an unpleasant, pleasant task, right, not anything inherent

0:16:56.200 --> 0:17:00.200
<v Speaker 1>to working electronically or virtually. Um. I think there. I've

0:17:00.240 --> 0:17:02.240
<v Speaker 1>met surgeons over the past year who said, you know what,

0:17:02.360 --> 0:17:04.640
<v Speaker 1>going remote has been the best thing I've been able

0:17:04.640 --> 0:17:06.720
<v Speaker 1>to do because I can spread my expertise around the

0:17:06.720 --> 0:17:08.760
<v Speaker 1>world more efficiently. I don't have to travel to go

0:17:08.840 --> 0:17:12.040
<v Speaker 1>and do a grand rounds. I can reach patients who

0:17:12.280 --> 0:17:14.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, otherwise wouldn't be able to benefit from my care.

0:17:14.800 --> 0:17:17.760
<v Speaker 1>And that's been a really meaningful changed my job. And

0:17:17.800 --> 0:17:19.119
<v Speaker 1>so what I want to do is I want to

0:17:19.160 --> 0:17:21.439
<v Speaker 1>I want to keep that connectivity and meaning, and I

0:17:21.440 --> 0:17:23.400
<v Speaker 1>want to subtract out some of the things that are

0:17:23.480 --> 0:17:25.760
<v Speaker 1>clearly a source of burnout and a chore for too

0:17:25.800 --> 0:17:29.160
<v Speaker 1>many people in too many jobs. So look, wait, let's

0:17:29.200 --> 0:17:32.399
<v Speaker 1>let's talk about your job for a moment. We alluded

0:17:32.400 --> 0:17:36.320
<v Speaker 1>to it earlier. But so you're at a school which

0:17:36.400 --> 0:17:38.879
<v Speaker 1>is very selected and which charges a lot of money

0:17:39.680 --> 0:17:42.720
<v Speaker 1>right for presumably because of an expectation of a certain

0:17:42.800 --> 0:17:46.199
<v Speaker 1>kind of experience. So what do you do? What do

0:17:46.240 --> 0:17:48.520
<v Speaker 1>you guys do next year? In the year after, do

0:17:49.040 --> 0:17:50.919
<v Speaker 1>you do you cut your tuition and a half and

0:17:51.000 --> 0:17:54.840
<v Speaker 1>go zoom classes or what are you gonna do? I

0:17:54.920 --> 0:17:57.119
<v Speaker 1>don't know yet. I think it's an open question. I

0:17:57.160 --> 0:17:59.280
<v Speaker 1>think the first thing we should be doing is running experiments,

0:17:59.320 --> 0:18:03.399
<v Speaker 1>which you know, look, I'm obviously, like everyone else, devastated

0:18:03.400 --> 0:18:06.200
<v Speaker 1>by the pandemic, but given that we're stuck with it,

0:18:06.200 --> 0:18:07.840
<v Speaker 1>it has been a good excuse for us to do

0:18:07.880 --> 0:18:10.760
<v Speaker 1>a lot of rethinking and experimentation. So I mentioned the

0:18:10.800 --> 0:18:13.719
<v Speaker 1>chat window earlier. When I started teaching online, some colleagues

0:18:13.720 --> 0:18:15.919
<v Speaker 1>and I said, all right, we're gonna use hashtags, and

0:18:15.960 --> 0:18:17.959
<v Speaker 1>we had students put in hashtag question if they had

0:18:17.960 --> 0:18:21.080
<v Speaker 1>a question, hashtag on fire if they had a burning

0:18:21.160 --> 0:18:23.600
<v Speaker 1>question or comment. And that means if I see on fire,

0:18:23.640 --> 0:18:26.320
<v Speaker 1>I will literally stop in mid sentence, floor is yours?

0:18:26.359 --> 0:18:28.800
<v Speaker 1>And that way you know you can jump the line um.

0:18:28.880 --> 0:18:31.520
<v Speaker 1>We had had then added hashtag a ha if you

0:18:31.560 --> 0:18:33.720
<v Speaker 1>had a Eureka moment, which helped me track what people

0:18:33.760 --> 0:18:36.119
<v Speaker 1>were learning. And sometimes I realized I hadn't got my

0:18:36.119 --> 0:18:39.920
<v Speaker 1>point across. Other times I saw that I clearly made

0:18:39.960 --> 0:18:41.520
<v Speaker 1>a point that I didn't even realize that would making

0:18:41.680 --> 0:18:44.240
<v Speaker 1>was making. And then in some cases too, it was

0:18:44.359 --> 0:18:46.320
<v Speaker 1>kind of a guide for students to track the learning

0:18:46.359 --> 0:18:48.639
<v Speaker 1>that was happening as it went. My favorite thing that

0:18:48.760 --> 0:18:51.840
<v Speaker 1>was hashtag debate, where if somebody wanted to disagree with

0:18:51.880 --> 0:18:53.840
<v Speaker 1>me or one of their classmates, I could get them

0:18:53.840 --> 0:18:56.360
<v Speaker 1>into the conversation UM. And I think that it's such

0:18:56.359 --> 0:18:58.200
<v Speaker 1>a small innovation, right, but I don't want to lose

0:18:58.240 --> 0:18:59.960
<v Speaker 1>that when I go back into the classroom. I want

0:19:00.000 --> 0:19:01.640
<v Speaker 1>to keep that dialogue going. I don't know what that's

0:19:01.640 --> 0:19:03.960
<v Speaker 1>gonna look like yet, but I wanted to happen. And

0:19:04.000 --> 0:19:05.720
<v Speaker 1>then the other thing that that really opened up that

0:19:05.760 --> 0:19:07.600
<v Speaker 1>I've never been able to do before is we brought

0:19:07.640 --> 0:19:10.040
<v Speaker 1>guest speakers from all over the world. Instead of just

0:19:10.200 --> 0:19:12.439
<v Speaker 1>asking the people who live in or near Philly, I

0:19:12.520 --> 0:19:14.919
<v Speaker 1>was able to go to people in multiple countries, on

0:19:15.000 --> 0:19:18.320
<v Speaker 1>multiple continents, um in lots of interesting places, and say, hey,

0:19:18.320 --> 0:19:20.199
<v Speaker 1>would you come to class for half an hour? I

0:19:20.240 --> 0:19:23.400
<v Speaker 1>think I might go guest speakers fully and permanently remote now,

0:19:23.960 --> 0:19:25.600
<v Speaker 1>because it means we can all go on zoom and

0:19:25.640 --> 0:19:28.240
<v Speaker 1>we can have an awesome conversation with somebody who would

0:19:28.280 --> 0:19:30.960
<v Speaker 1>never show up in my class. So I want to

0:19:30.960 --> 0:19:33.000
<v Speaker 1>see us do more of those kinds of experiments. But

0:19:33.040 --> 0:19:35.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to give up on the burstinus or

0:19:35.600 --> 0:19:41.360
<v Speaker 1>the connection that happens in the physical classroom. Is that fair? Yeah?

0:19:41.400 --> 0:19:44.120
<v Speaker 1>I did it, It's fair. I would a couple of

0:19:44.880 --> 0:19:49.840
<v Speaker 1>caveats here, which is that, Um? I wonder whether there

0:19:49.920 --> 0:19:54.160
<v Speaker 1>isn't a great deal of nuance and variability in different

0:19:54.200 --> 0:19:59.920
<v Speaker 1>audiences responses to digital environments. So I need an as

0:20:00.040 --> 0:20:02.800
<v Speaker 1>to a question. Suppose I have a room full of

0:20:02.880 --> 0:20:08.920
<v Speaker 1>kids in a economically disadvantaged neighborhood there in fourth grade. Um,

0:20:09.000 --> 0:20:11.400
<v Speaker 1>how much what is the right what is the right

0:20:11.520 --> 0:20:15.399
<v Speaker 1>mix of online and in person for that group versus

0:20:16.640 --> 0:20:20.600
<v Speaker 1>your students are not only are they much older, but

0:20:20.680 --> 0:20:22.960
<v Speaker 1>they are you know, the best in the broadest, So

0:20:23.000 --> 0:20:25.159
<v Speaker 1>the cream of the crop is it? Does that make

0:20:25.200 --> 0:20:28.800
<v Speaker 1>a difference. Are they are is a more mature and

0:20:28.880 --> 0:20:34.200
<v Speaker 1>disciplined and um intellectually engaged group of students better suited

0:20:34.280 --> 0:20:39.320
<v Speaker 1>for online experiences than kids? You know, I think both

0:20:39.359 --> 0:20:42.040
<v Speaker 1>of us have suspicions about the answer that question. But

0:20:42.119 --> 0:20:45.359
<v Speaker 1>I wonder whether we need to get a lot more

0:20:45.520 --> 0:20:49.800
<v Speaker 1>nuanced in what mixes worth work best for what kinds

0:20:49.800 --> 0:20:53.360
<v Speaker 1>of students and what kinds of situations. Yeah, I think

0:20:53.359 --> 0:20:55.400
<v Speaker 1>that's such an important point. I haven't seen good data

0:20:55.440 --> 0:20:58.040
<v Speaker 1>on it yet, but I had the same intuition that

0:20:58.920 --> 0:21:02.960
<v Speaker 1>tech savvy and also some degree of intrinsic motivation is

0:21:03.000 --> 0:21:06.320
<v Speaker 1>a huge set of contingencies for determining whether online is

0:21:06.359 --> 0:21:09.720
<v Speaker 1>going to be even remotely engaging no pun intended. I

0:21:09.760 --> 0:21:11.680
<v Speaker 1>also think the type of work and the type of

0:21:11.760 --> 0:21:14.359
<v Speaker 1>learning we're doing really matters. So in general, I hate

0:21:14.359 --> 0:21:17.000
<v Speaker 1>sports metaphors when applied to work, but I'm gonna use

0:21:17.000 --> 0:21:20.000
<v Speaker 1>one here. Normally, I think, Okay, we haven't agreed on

0:21:20.040 --> 0:21:22.360
<v Speaker 1>how to keep score, we haven't agreed on all the rules,

0:21:22.400 --> 0:21:24.680
<v Speaker 1>and we don't have a referee. We're also leaving out

0:21:24.720 --> 0:21:27.400
<v Speaker 1>maybe half the population. But this is a rare exception

0:21:27.920 --> 0:21:31.080
<v Speaker 1>where when we study independence and organizational psychology, we distinguished

0:21:31.080 --> 0:21:34.399
<v Speaker 1>between pooled, sequential and reciprocal independence. Say that five times fast.

0:21:34.960 --> 0:21:37.760
<v Speaker 1>I prefer to think about them as individual sport, relay sport,

0:21:37.880 --> 0:21:41.040
<v Speaker 1>and team sport. So if your job or your classroom

0:21:41.080 --> 0:21:43.960
<v Speaker 1>is basically an individual sport like gymnastics, where everyone's gonna

0:21:43.960 --> 0:21:45.960
<v Speaker 1>do their own floor routine and their own bar and

0:21:46.000 --> 0:21:48.879
<v Speaker 1>their own vault um, you don't need that much coordination.

0:21:48.960 --> 0:21:51.400
<v Speaker 1>You can do a lot of independent, individualized remote work

0:21:51.400 --> 0:21:53.600
<v Speaker 1>and learning because the whole will basically be the sum

0:21:53.600 --> 0:21:56.000
<v Speaker 1>of the parts. If you're in a relay sport, though,

0:21:56.040 --> 0:21:58.200
<v Speaker 1>the person who's handing the bason to the next runner

0:21:58.640 --> 0:22:00.479
<v Speaker 1>needs to actually talk to that on her and then

0:22:00.480 --> 0:22:02.480
<v Speaker 1>also the person at the start needs to talk with

0:22:02.520 --> 0:22:04.119
<v Speaker 1>the person that finish to make sure they're going in

0:22:04.119 --> 0:22:07.119
<v Speaker 1>the same destination or the same direction. I think the

0:22:07.160 --> 0:22:11.560
<v Speaker 1>most important context for really getting real synchronization of time

0:22:11.600 --> 0:22:13.840
<v Speaker 1>and space is probably when we're playing a true team

0:22:13.840 --> 0:22:16.160
<v Speaker 1>sport like basketball or soccer. Right, if I'm gonna pass

0:22:16.200 --> 0:22:17.399
<v Speaker 1>you the ball, and then you're gonna send it back

0:22:17.440 --> 0:22:18.680
<v Speaker 1>to me, and then I'm gonna send to someone else,

0:22:18.680 --> 0:22:20.680
<v Speaker 1>and then it goes back to you again, and everybody

0:22:20.720 --> 0:22:23.040
<v Speaker 1>has multiple pairs of eyes and multiple touches on the

0:22:23.040 --> 0:22:26.600
<v Speaker 1>project or the lesson. That's when it's it becomes really

0:22:26.600 --> 0:22:30.160
<v Speaker 1>difficult to substitute for the face to face, in person experience.

0:22:30.400 --> 0:22:32.320
<v Speaker 1>And I don't think we've had enough of these conversations

0:22:32.359 --> 0:22:35.000
<v Speaker 1>in our organizations or in our schools asking what are

0:22:35.000 --> 0:22:37.200
<v Speaker 1>we doing right now? Are we playing individual sport, relay

0:22:37.240 --> 0:22:42.760
<v Speaker 1>sport or team sport? Yeah? Yeah, no, absolutely, um Adam.

0:22:42.880 --> 0:22:49.280
<v Speaker 1>As always, this was delightful. UM. I'm still slightly baffled

0:22:49.280 --> 0:22:51.240
<v Speaker 1>that we seem to have so little to disagree about,

0:22:51.680 --> 0:22:55.120
<v Speaker 1>but yeah, there's always hope for next time. Next time,

0:22:55.160 --> 0:22:58.400
<v Speaker 1>I hope with both of us, are you know, bloodied

0:22:58.400 --> 0:23:00.520
<v Speaker 1>and torn by the end of our encount her, But

0:23:00.720 --> 0:23:03.800
<v Speaker 1>in this case, this is not the case. So but

0:23:03.920 --> 0:23:07.399
<v Speaker 1>thank you very much for joining us, uh, and thank

0:23:07.440 --> 0:23:12.520
<v Speaker 1>you UM to IBM for for bringing bringing us together

0:23:12.600 --> 0:23:16.360
<v Speaker 1>and sponsoring this lovely conversation. Thank you thrilled to be here,

0:23:16.400 --> 0:23:22.320
<v Speaker 1>this is great fun. Thanks for having me, Thanks again

0:23:22.359 --> 0:23:24.359
<v Speaker 1>to Adam for having a great chat with me about

0:23:24.400 --> 0:23:29.080
<v Speaker 1>the ever present cubicle versus couch debate, and thanks to

0:23:29.160 --> 0:23:34.480
<v Speaker 1>IBM for setting up such an informative conference Smart Talks

0:23:34.480 --> 0:23:38.199
<v Speaker 1>with IBM is produced by Emily Rostag with Carly Migliori,

0:23:38.480 --> 0:23:43.560
<v Speaker 1>edited by Karen Shaker, g engineering by Martin Gonzalez, mixed

0:23:43.560 --> 0:23:49.160
<v Speaker 1>and mastered by Jason Gambrell and Ben Toliday. Music by Grandmascope.

0:23:50.040 --> 0:23:53.640
<v Speaker 1>Special thanks to Molly Sosha, Andy Kelly, Nea La Belle,

0:23:53.720 --> 0:23:57.359
<v Speaker 1>Jacob Weisberg, Head of Fane, Eric Sandler, and Meggie Taylor,

0:23:57.800 --> 0:24:01.520
<v Speaker 1>and the teams at eight Bar and b M. Smart

0:24:01.560 --> 0:24:04.919
<v Speaker 1>Talks with IBM is a production of Pushkin Industries and

0:24:04.960 --> 0:24:08.840
<v Speaker 1>I Heart Media. You can find more Pushkin podcasts on

0:24:08.920 --> 0:24:12.320
<v Speaker 1>the I Heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you

0:24:12.400 --> 0:24:16.280
<v Speaker 1>like to listen. I'm Malcolm Gladwell, See you next time.