WEBVTT - Apple vs the FBI

0:00:04.519 --> 0:00:13.920
<v Speaker 1>Technology Stuff from Hey there, and welcome to Tech Stuff.

0:00:13.960 --> 0:00:17.040
<v Speaker 1>I am your host Jonathan Strickland joining me in the

0:00:17.079 --> 0:00:21.320
<v Speaker 1>studio today. He's my friend, he's yours. He's Ben Boland, Ben,

0:00:21.360 --> 0:00:23.920
<v Speaker 1>welcome back to the show. Hey, Jonathan, thank you so

0:00:24.000 --> 0:00:27.360
<v Speaker 1>much for having me on the show. Even though we

0:00:27.600 --> 0:00:32.280
<v Speaker 1>know that we're both going to have to work assiduously

0:00:33.360 --> 0:00:36.040
<v Speaker 1>to keep this a family friendly show. You've invited me

0:00:36.200 --> 0:00:39.720
<v Speaker 1>on to talk about, Yeah, talk about a subject that

0:00:40.440 --> 0:00:44.360
<v Speaker 1>is guaranteed to get us. As my grandfather would say,

0:00:44.479 --> 0:00:49.200
<v Speaker 1>all head up, we get all head up in here. Yeah,

0:00:49.240 --> 0:00:52.520
<v Speaker 1>So we're gonna talk about something that's actually we're gonna

0:00:52.520 --> 0:00:54.480
<v Speaker 1>have to work very hard for multiple reasons, because we're

0:00:54.480 --> 0:00:58.880
<v Speaker 1>talking about Apple versus the FBI, the whole story that's

0:00:59.000 --> 0:01:03.480
<v Speaker 1>unfolding as we record this um and to talk about

0:01:03.520 --> 0:01:07.480
<v Speaker 1>what is behind that case, what are the implications, what

0:01:07.640 --> 0:01:11.200
<v Speaker 1>is the FBI's argument, what is Apple's argument? And in

0:01:11.560 --> 0:01:16.040
<v Speaker 1>addition to that, we have, of course the added responsibility

0:01:16.080 --> 0:01:21.080
<v Speaker 1>of remembering that this is all centered around a truly

0:01:21.400 --> 0:01:26.360
<v Speaker 1>awful crime. Yes, absolutely so. The what we're what we're

0:01:26.400 --> 0:01:31.920
<v Speaker 1>talking about specifically hit mainstream news when Apple did something

0:01:31.959 --> 0:01:35.720
<v Speaker 1>that a lot of tech companies have never done. They

0:01:35.840 --> 0:01:41.720
<v Speaker 1>issued a blanket statement letter and went public with a

0:01:42.720 --> 0:01:45.759
<v Speaker 1>They went public with a response to an FBI request.

0:01:45.800 --> 0:01:47.360
<v Speaker 1>But I guess I'm getting ahead of it. What was

0:01:47.400 --> 0:01:49.520
<v Speaker 1>the crime? Well, let's yeah, let's I'll give you the

0:01:49.560 --> 0:01:53.320
<v Speaker 1>background on what's happened and we'll we'll build from there.

0:01:53.440 --> 0:01:56.240
<v Speaker 1>So first we have to look back on December two,

0:01:56.600 --> 0:02:00.520
<v Speaker 1>two thousand fifteen, uh and San Bernardino, Kelly, Flornia. That's

0:02:00.520 --> 0:02:05.280
<v Speaker 1>in southern California, and that's when to well, an American

0:02:05.360 --> 0:02:10.320
<v Speaker 1>citizen and I legal resident, husband wife team, both of

0:02:10.440 --> 0:02:17.280
<v Speaker 1>Pakistani descent, committed a mass shooting. It was a Sayed

0:02:17.400 --> 0:02:22.640
<v Speaker 1>Rizwan Faruk and tash Feen Malik who committed this act,

0:02:22.800 --> 0:02:25.200
<v Speaker 1>and it happened at the Department of Public Health. They

0:02:25.240 --> 0:02:28.200
<v Speaker 1>were having an event that was starting off as a

0:02:28.240 --> 0:02:32.079
<v Speaker 1>training event and then it was supposed to transition into

0:02:32.160 --> 0:02:37.359
<v Speaker 1>a holiday event. And after the training element. Faruk, who

0:02:37.360 --> 0:02:39.680
<v Speaker 1>was actually at the event, he was in the employee

0:02:39.680 --> 0:02:43.400
<v Speaker 1>of the Department of Public Health, he was a food inspector, left,

0:02:43.919 --> 0:02:46.680
<v Speaker 1>came back with his wife. They were both heavily armed

0:02:47.160 --> 0:02:50.600
<v Speaker 1>and they both started firing into the crowd of people

0:02:50.639 --> 0:02:53.280
<v Speaker 1>at the Department of Public Health. Fourteen people were killed,

0:02:53.400 --> 0:02:59.760
<v Speaker 1>twenty two injured. Very serious crime. Then uh Faruke and

0:03:00.040 --> 0:03:04.960
<v Speaker 1>Malite left. They fled the scene. Turned out they had

0:03:04.960 --> 0:03:09.200
<v Speaker 1>also left behind an explosive device, which thankfully did not detonate.

0:03:10.280 --> 0:03:13.679
<v Speaker 1>Failed to detonate uh and they they fled in a

0:03:14.680 --> 0:03:18.520
<v Speaker 1>vehicle that they had rented a few days before, and

0:03:18.600 --> 0:03:21.680
<v Speaker 1>several hours later law enforcement tracked them down. There was

0:03:21.720 --> 0:03:25.720
<v Speaker 1>a confrontation, there was a shootout UH and then both

0:03:26.000 --> 0:03:29.440
<v Speaker 1>of the shooters died as a result of that shootout.

0:03:29.880 --> 0:03:33.360
<v Speaker 1>The FBI has stated that they believed, based upon the

0:03:33.400 --> 0:03:35.720
<v Speaker 1>evidence they were able to find that the two were

0:03:35.760 --> 0:03:38.040
<v Speaker 1>acting on their own, that they were not part of

0:03:38.080 --> 0:03:41.640
<v Speaker 1>some sort of terrorist cell in the United States. However,

0:03:41.680 --> 0:03:44.480
<v Speaker 1>they can't be absolutely certain of that. That's where the

0:03:44.920 --> 0:03:48.000
<v Speaker 1>crux of this issue with Apple is going to come

0:03:48.000 --> 0:03:51.840
<v Speaker 1>into play. And the big part of it is they

0:03:51.880 --> 0:03:57.200
<v Speaker 1>can't account for it's just less than twenty minutes of

0:03:57.200 --> 0:04:02.240
<v Speaker 1>the activity that happened between the shooting or leading up

0:04:02.240 --> 0:04:04.800
<v Speaker 1>to the shooting, and around the shooting, because they're they're

0:04:04.800 --> 0:04:08.520
<v Speaker 1>thinking that there's a possibility that something that happened within

0:04:08.560 --> 0:04:11.200
<v Speaker 1>that time could give them more information and at least

0:04:11.200 --> 0:04:15.280
<v Speaker 1>allow them to confirm whether or not they truly acted

0:04:15.320 --> 0:04:17.640
<v Speaker 1>on their own or if they were under the direction

0:04:17.800 --> 0:04:21.599
<v Speaker 1>of some other group, which could potentially and this is

0:04:21.640 --> 0:04:25.680
<v Speaker 1>an FBI argument, which could potentially give the government the

0:04:25.760 --> 0:04:29.599
<v Speaker 1>ability to prevent a future attack. And more to that point,

0:04:29.920 --> 0:04:33.560
<v Speaker 1>neither of them had been listed in any database as

0:04:33.560 --> 0:04:38.160
<v Speaker 1>a potential threat. So that puts extra pressure on the government,

0:04:38.279 --> 0:04:43.599
<v Speaker 1>right because citizens say, well, why did this happen? The

0:04:43.640 --> 0:04:49.000
<v Speaker 1>government says, we followed procedure and neither of them registered

0:04:49.040 --> 0:04:51.839
<v Speaker 1>on any of ours and there are no red flags,

0:04:51.920 --> 0:04:55.000
<v Speaker 1>so we had no way of knowing. And uh, that

0:04:55.040 --> 0:04:58.480
<v Speaker 1>means there's actual extra pressure on the FBI to investigate

0:04:58.480 --> 0:05:02.680
<v Speaker 1>this thoroughly, partially to show that in fact, everything that

0:05:02.720 --> 0:05:06.440
<v Speaker 1>could be done had been done short of taking some

0:05:06.560 --> 0:05:09.640
<v Speaker 1>extreme step that none of us want to see. Right,

0:05:09.680 --> 0:05:12.760
<v Speaker 1>the idea of like, okay, everyone of Pakistani descent has

0:05:12.800 --> 0:05:16.120
<v Speaker 1>to leave the country. That's ridiculous. We would that's that's

0:05:16.200 --> 0:05:18.479
<v Speaker 1>returning to an era of the United States history that

0:05:18.520 --> 0:05:20.360
<v Speaker 1>we do not want to revisit, like a World War

0:05:20.400 --> 0:05:23.919
<v Speaker 1>two internment camp situation. Yeah, we don't want that. We

0:05:23.960 --> 0:05:27.120
<v Speaker 1>don't want that because it is never fair to lump

0:05:27.200 --> 0:05:29.880
<v Speaker 1>innocent people in for fear that one of them might

0:05:29.880 --> 0:05:33.359
<v Speaker 1>be guilty. That's not cool, right, this is I'm already

0:05:33.360 --> 0:05:34.880
<v Speaker 1>getting angry and i haven't even gotten to the part

0:05:34.920 --> 0:05:37.480
<v Speaker 1>about the apple stuff yet. I'm going for a slow burning,

0:05:38.080 --> 0:05:42.000
<v Speaker 1>that's fair. So one of the thing that's that all

0:05:42.000 --> 0:05:45.360
<v Speaker 1>of this is about, ostensibly any at any rate, is

0:05:45.839 --> 0:05:50.760
<v Speaker 1>an iPhone. It's specifically an iPhone five C, probably running

0:05:50.760 --> 0:05:57.080
<v Speaker 1>iOS nine. That's based upon the various public filings we've

0:05:57.120 --> 0:06:00.919
<v Speaker 1>seen about this um and it was county owned. It

0:06:01.000 --> 0:06:03.719
<v Speaker 1>was owned by the Department of Public Health and then

0:06:03.760 --> 0:06:06.960
<v Speaker 1>issued to Farouke who worked for the department Department of

0:06:06.960 --> 0:06:10.200
<v Speaker 1>Public Health, so it was county owned. The FBI went

0:06:10.240 --> 0:06:12.599
<v Speaker 1>to the county and said, we want your permission to

0:06:12.760 --> 0:06:15.839
<v Speaker 1>access the contents on this phone. The county said, of course,

0:06:15.880 --> 0:06:18.800
<v Speaker 1>you have our permission. You can access it. Now. If

0:06:18.800 --> 0:06:21.359
<v Speaker 1>that's all there were to it, it would be fine.

0:06:21.400 --> 0:06:24.080
<v Speaker 1>I would just access the phone. They've already received permission

0:06:24.120 --> 0:06:27.400
<v Speaker 1>from the phone's owner, and they could call through it

0:06:27.440 --> 0:06:29.839
<v Speaker 1>to look for any evidence that would lead them to

0:06:29.880 --> 0:06:35.960
<v Speaker 1>more information about this crime. But there is a security

0:06:36.040 --> 0:06:38.640
<v Speaker 1>measure on the phone, and it's a very simple one.

0:06:38.680 --> 0:06:42.400
<v Speaker 1>It's on lots of smartphones. It's it's a little password.

0:06:42.480 --> 0:06:46.359
<v Speaker 1>In this case, it's a a four or six digit

0:06:46.640 --> 0:06:50.840
<v Speaker 1>pin which can be alpha numeric if you activate that

0:06:51.279 --> 0:06:53.920
<v Speaker 1>option on the six digit. So it's one of the two.

0:06:54.000 --> 0:06:59.320
<v Speaker 1>We don't know which, and without that pen, you cannot

0:06:59.360 --> 0:07:03.880
<v Speaker 1>access the the information because the way the pen works.

0:07:03.920 --> 0:07:05.280
<v Speaker 1>This is where we get into the tech stuff. Been

0:07:06.440 --> 0:07:09.160
<v Speaker 1>There are two levels of encryption. You are two keys

0:07:09.240 --> 0:07:11.880
<v Speaker 1>to this encryption. One of the keys is the pen.

0:07:12.560 --> 0:07:16.400
<v Speaker 1>The other key is hard coded onto the device itself.

0:07:17.160 --> 0:07:19.880
<v Speaker 1>All right, it's only it's if you think about movies

0:07:19.920 --> 0:07:22.760
<v Speaker 1>like those nineties movies with the nuclear power, where you

0:07:22.840 --> 0:07:26.280
<v Speaker 1>have to have two generals put their keys into the

0:07:26.320 --> 0:07:28.600
<v Speaker 1>same sort of thing. So if you don't have the pen,

0:07:29.240 --> 0:07:32.280
<v Speaker 1>it can't combine with the hardware key, and therefore you

0:07:32.320 --> 0:07:37.040
<v Speaker 1>cannot unlock the information. The idea here is that Apple

0:07:37.560 --> 0:07:42.520
<v Speaker 1>doesn't have the pen, right, which is cool because it

0:07:42.560 --> 0:07:46.280
<v Speaker 1>means that if you or I or you listeners have

0:07:46.760 --> 0:07:50.720
<v Speaker 1>an iPhone, it means you can trust Apple because they

0:07:50.800 --> 0:07:55.200
<v Speaker 1>don't know your pin, right, they can't access your phone. Uh,

0:07:55.480 --> 0:07:57.800
<v Speaker 1>you know that That was the whole point one. Two

0:07:57.840 --> 0:08:00.760
<v Speaker 1>points one. Apple wanted to make its cure enough so

0:08:00.840 --> 0:08:03.880
<v Speaker 1>that consumers would say, I feel good about buying an

0:08:03.880 --> 0:08:07.280
<v Speaker 1>iPhone because I know whatever I store on it, whether

0:08:07.800 --> 0:08:10.520
<v Speaker 1>it's something that's personal or it's just you know, it's

0:08:10.520 --> 0:08:13.480
<v Speaker 1>no one else's business, whatever it may be, no one

0:08:13.520 --> 0:08:15.200
<v Speaker 1>else is going to have access to that unless I

0:08:15.240 --> 0:08:19.640
<v Speaker 1>give them my pen. It's good for Apple, not just

0:08:19.680 --> 0:08:23.040
<v Speaker 1>because consumers are happy, but because Apple then hasn't out

0:08:23.320 --> 0:08:25.040
<v Speaker 1>If the government comes to Apple and says, hey, we

0:08:25.040 --> 0:08:27.200
<v Speaker 1>want you to break into this phone, they can literally

0:08:27.240 --> 0:08:30.000
<v Speaker 1>say we cannot do that. It's not that we will not,

0:08:30.200 --> 0:08:34.000
<v Speaker 1>it's that we literally physically cannot grant your request because

0:08:34.040 --> 0:08:38.199
<v Speaker 1>it's impossible. And there's also I would just to expound

0:08:38.240 --> 0:08:42.120
<v Speaker 1>that point a little bit further. This I'm not suggesting

0:08:42.120 --> 0:08:46.360
<v Speaker 1>as their conscious will or intention, but this also removes

0:08:46.440 --> 0:08:51.680
<v Speaker 1>possible culpability. Yes, yes, so all of these are very

0:08:51.720 --> 0:08:54.679
<v Speaker 1>important points. Right, So let's get into a little bit

0:08:54.720 --> 0:08:57.400
<v Speaker 1>more of why the FBI is coming to Apple. So

0:08:58.480 --> 0:09:01.280
<v Speaker 1>let's say that it's a four digit pin all right,

0:09:01.480 --> 0:09:07.040
<v Speaker 1>all numeric, simplest version. That means there are ten thousand

0:09:07.080 --> 0:09:11.040
<v Speaker 1>combinations that are possible for that pen. That's it. That's

0:09:11.200 --> 0:09:14.080
<v Speaker 1>you're limited to ten thousand, which is that's a lot,

0:09:14.640 --> 0:09:16.400
<v Speaker 1>but it's not that much if you're going to do

0:09:16.640 --> 0:09:19.199
<v Speaker 1>something like a brute force attack. Right. So if you

0:09:19.240 --> 0:09:22.120
<v Speaker 1>do a brute force attack on a normal system, and

0:09:22.160 --> 0:09:24.840
<v Speaker 1>there are only ten thousand variations, it's with a fast

0:09:24.920 --> 0:09:27.640
<v Speaker 1>enough computer, it's just a matter of minutes. But there's

0:09:27.679 --> 0:09:32.439
<v Speaker 1>some limitations on the iPhone that make this harder. Does

0:09:32.480 --> 0:09:36.120
<v Speaker 1>it freeze if you enter the incorrect pen? It does

0:09:36.160 --> 0:09:38.880
<v Speaker 1>more than freeze, right, So, first of all, there is

0:09:38.880 --> 0:09:42.400
<v Speaker 1>an eighty millisecond delay when you enter a pen and

0:09:42.440 --> 0:09:44.720
<v Speaker 1>when it gets verified that it is or is not

0:09:45.000 --> 0:09:48.800
<v Speaker 1>the correct one. Right, So with that eighty millisecond delay,

0:09:48.960 --> 0:09:51.280
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't sound like much, but it means you can't

0:09:51.360 --> 0:09:54.520
<v Speaker 1>just blast a whole bunch of numbers through. Also, you

0:09:54.559 --> 0:09:56.559
<v Speaker 1>have to type it in on a screen. You can't

0:09:56.960 --> 0:09:59.400
<v Speaker 1>hook it up to a computer and just digitally send

0:10:00.040 --> 0:10:03.000
<v Speaker 1>the various pen combinations to try and get through. You

0:10:03.040 --> 0:10:05.280
<v Speaker 1>have to actually tap them on on the screen to

0:10:05.760 --> 0:10:07.680
<v Speaker 1>do it over and over. So that means you tap

0:10:07.720 --> 0:10:11.000
<v Speaker 1>in the number eighty milliseconds pass, you get the confirmation

0:10:11.080 --> 0:10:17.240
<v Speaker 1>or denial, tap in the number next. Uh, if you

0:10:17.440 --> 0:10:23.560
<v Speaker 1>hit ten consecutive incorrect pen entries the phone interprets that

0:10:23.679 --> 0:10:26.160
<v Speaker 1>is saying someone else who is not the owner has

0:10:26.200 --> 0:10:28.840
<v Speaker 1>gotten possession of this phone. So in order to protect

0:10:28.840 --> 0:10:33.319
<v Speaker 1>the owner's information, we're scrambling everything, and you lose all

0:10:33.360 --> 0:10:37.400
<v Speaker 1>the metadata. Everything is useless. So even if you got

0:10:37.400 --> 0:10:39.720
<v Speaker 1>the pen afterward, you would not be able to access

0:10:39.720 --> 0:10:41.319
<v Speaker 1>the stuff you were looking for in the first place.

0:10:41.360 --> 0:10:43.840
<v Speaker 1>You would maybe be able to turn on the phone,

0:10:43.880 --> 0:10:45.719
<v Speaker 1>but there wouldn't be anything there to find. Yeah, you

0:10:46.000 --> 0:10:48.840
<v Speaker 1>would have, just you would have just it would be

0:10:48.880 --> 0:10:52.000
<v Speaker 1>like you just accidentally set fire to the file room,

0:10:52.360 --> 0:10:54.199
<v Speaker 1>like you know, like you can't get into the file

0:10:54.280 --> 0:10:57.319
<v Speaker 1>room door, and whatever you try and do accidentally sets

0:10:57.320 --> 0:10:59.439
<v Speaker 1>a fire inside the file room. You then get the

0:10:59.480 --> 0:11:01.280
<v Speaker 1>key to the aisle room, and then you think, well,

0:11:01.600 --> 0:11:06.119
<v Speaker 1>what's the point you lost everything? And it's it's virtually assured.

0:11:06.640 --> 0:11:11.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah that out of those yeah, out of those ten

0:11:11.160 --> 0:11:14.880
<v Speaker 1>thousand tries, your first ten are going to be wrong. Yeah,

0:11:14.960 --> 0:11:17.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean, just the odds are pretty much against you,

0:11:17.440 --> 0:11:23.280
<v Speaker 1>unless you're ridiculously lucky. So there's that, and and of

0:11:23.320 --> 0:11:26.080
<v Speaker 1>course they don't they also if it were an actual

0:11:26.200 --> 0:11:30.000
<v Speaker 1>later iPhone, if it weren't the iPhone five C, they

0:11:30.000 --> 0:11:33.640
<v Speaker 1>would have an added problem, which is that with the

0:11:33.760 --> 0:11:38.360
<v Speaker 1>later models there's an additional delay after four failed tries.

0:11:39.240 --> 0:11:41.920
<v Speaker 1>So if you try four times and fail, it will

0:11:41.960 --> 0:11:44.000
<v Speaker 1>then give you a five second delay before you can

0:11:44.000 --> 0:11:45.920
<v Speaker 1>try the fifth time. After that, it gives you a

0:11:45.960 --> 0:11:49.120
<v Speaker 1>fifteen second delay after that, like by the time you

0:11:49.120 --> 0:11:52.600
<v Speaker 1>get to the ninth try, it's an hour delay. Think

0:11:52.640 --> 0:11:55.800
<v Speaker 1>about what you're doing, right, So, but the five C

0:11:56.000 --> 0:11:58.679
<v Speaker 1>doesn't have that, So you may have read about that delay.

0:11:58.720 --> 0:12:02.600
<v Speaker 1>It does not qualify for this particular case. Through force

0:12:02.679 --> 0:12:06.240
<v Speaker 1>won't work in the most basic pin situation. But in

0:12:06.280 --> 0:12:09.440
<v Speaker 1>the six digit alpha numeric I just imagine the same

0:12:09.520 --> 0:12:14.240
<v Speaker 1>rules apply, but the yeah, yeah, exactly, but the possible

0:12:14.480 --> 0:12:18.439
<v Speaker 1>answers are much greater because now you've got six digits.

0:12:18.480 --> 0:12:22.280
<v Speaker 1>You've also got the possibility of alphabet alpha characters in

0:12:22.280 --> 0:12:28.160
<v Speaker 1>their alphabet characters. I believe so. Um So, anyway, from

0:12:28.160 --> 0:12:30.160
<v Speaker 1>why here, if you were to try and use brute

0:12:30.200 --> 0:12:33.520
<v Speaker 1>force on um a six digit alpha numeric one, it

0:12:33.520 --> 0:12:35.840
<v Speaker 1>would take you with a with a fast computer that

0:12:35.920 --> 0:12:38.439
<v Speaker 1>had been optimized for this, it would take you about

0:12:38.480 --> 0:12:41.679
<v Speaker 1>six years to break through it. And that's going through

0:12:41.720 --> 0:12:45.280
<v Speaker 1>all the different possible combinations. Assuming that there's not another

0:12:45.400 --> 0:12:48.120
<v Speaker 1>kill switch type deal like there is with the iPhone.

0:12:48.200 --> 0:12:51.000
<v Speaker 1>By the way, that's software that Apple has built into

0:12:51.160 --> 0:12:54.880
<v Speaker 1>the iPhone, really firmware that Apple is built into the iPhone.

0:12:55.240 --> 0:12:59.440
<v Speaker 1>It's not like it's a fundamental you know quality that

0:12:59.520 --> 0:13:03.160
<v Speaker 1>all smart phones, right, Yeah, yeah, that's that's specific to

0:13:03.240 --> 0:13:07.520
<v Speaker 1>Apple phones. Right. So you've got this problem, right, you

0:13:07.559 --> 0:13:10.400
<v Speaker 1>have the FBI. They've gotten permission from the owner of

0:13:10.440 --> 0:13:14.320
<v Speaker 1>the phone to access the phones uh contents. But the

0:13:14.320 --> 0:13:16.960
<v Speaker 1>owner of the phone doesn't know the pen because the

0:13:16.960 --> 0:13:20.520
<v Speaker 1>owner of the phone had had issued it to an employee.

0:13:20.559 --> 0:13:23.240
<v Speaker 1>The employee had come up with the pen, So they

0:13:23.240 --> 0:13:24.719
<v Speaker 1>don't know if it's a four digit, they don't know

0:13:24.720 --> 0:13:27.760
<v Speaker 1>if it's a six digit, they don't know. Um, they

0:13:27.800 --> 0:13:30.720
<v Speaker 1>don't know if this uh this feature where after ten

0:13:30.800 --> 0:13:33.560
<v Speaker 1>tries everything gets raised. They don't know if that's necessarily

0:13:33.600 --> 0:13:37.559
<v Speaker 1>active because you can turn it off, but all indications

0:13:37.640 --> 0:13:40.640
<v Speaker 1>point to it being on. For one, it was on

0:13:40.840 --> 0:13:44.800
<v Speaker 1>when the phone was issued to Farouke, right, And people

0:13:44.840 --> 0:13:49.960
<v Speaker 1>typically don't change their defaults post phone users. So FBI

0:13:50.080 --> 0:13:55.520
<v Speaker 1>wants Apple to do something particular, and it's something different

0:13:55.559 --> 0:13:59.240
<v Speaker 1>from what we've talked about in previous episodes about a

0:13:59.320 --> 0:14:03.040
<v Speaker 1>back door entrance into a system. It's not quite the

0:14:03.080 --> 0:14:07.000
<v Speaker 1>same thing. So you've got this phone, you can't brute

0:14:07.040 --> 0:14:12.560
<v Speaker 1>force attack it without risking damaging the contents. Apple cannot

0:14:12.640 --> 0:14:15.960
<v Speaker 1>access the information on this phone. By design, they did

0:14:16.000 --> 0:14:20.040
<v Speaker 1>not want that to have that capability. So what the

0:14:20.080 --> 0:14:23.240
<v Speaker 1>FBI wants Apple to do is build a new version

0:14:23.640 --> 0:14:28.600
<v Speaker 1>of iOS just for this phone, a specific iOS for

0:14:28.680 --> 0:14:34.000
<v Speaker 1>this phone that disables the safety features that would one

0:14:34.120 --> 0:14:38.920
<v Speaker 1>prevent brute force attacks from happening quickly, to allow brute

0:14:38.960 --> 0:14:41.880
<v Speaker 1>force to attacks to happen by hooking up the phone

0:14:41.880 --> 0:14:43.560
<v Speaker 1>to a computer so you don't have to tap those

0:14:43.640 --> 0:14:47.960
<v Speaker 1>numbers in it shore and three disabling that kill switch.

0:14:48.840 --> 0:14:51.720
<v Speaker 1>So what the FBI wants Apple to do is to

0:14:51.840 --> 0:14:55.800
<v Speaker 1>build up a brand new iOS again just for this

0:14:55.880 --> 0:14:59.720
<v Speaker 1>one phone, and then install it on the phone. This

0:15:00.000 --> 0:15:04.920
<v Speaker 1>to all, you know, hypothetically happen on Apple grounds, like

0:15:05.080 --> 0:15:08.880
<v Speaker 1>at an Apple location, either at the corporate headquarters or

0:15:08.920 --> 0:15:14.560
<v Speaker 1>wherever um. And then in theory, you would then destroy

0:15:14.680 --> 0:15:20.320
<v Speaker 1>the the the custom iOS because you only needed it

0:15:20.360 --> 0:15:23.440
<v Speaker 1>for that one phone, right, because it was so easy

0:15:23.520 --> 0:15:26.600
<v Speaker 1>to toss the one ring, bring it back to more door,

0:15:26.640 --> 0:15:30.320
<v Speaker 1>and destroy it right, Yeah, yeah, you know what, Mount doom.

0:15:30.800 --> 0:15:34.880
<v Speaker 1>Plenty of backdoors. It's fine, it's integral to the plot.

0:15:34.920 --> 0:15:37.880
<v Speaker 1>That was that was Souron's problem was that he did

0:15:37.920 --> 0:15:43.560
<v Speaker 1>not plug the security vulnerabilities doom. I mean, that's that's

0:15:43.600 --> 0:15:46.520
<v Speaker 1>a classic example, like you know, right up there with

0:15:46.560 --> 0:15:50.200
<v Speaker 1>the whole land war with Asia thing. So FBI has

0:15:50.240 --> 0:15:53.240
<v Speaker 1>been very very careful in framing this in a way

0:15:53.360 --> 0:15:58.920
<v Speaker 1>that presents it as a reasonable request, one time thing.

0:15:58.960 --> 0:16:01.280
<v Speaker 1>That's a that's a big deal, right, saying this is

0:16:01.320 --> 0:16:04.320
<v Speaker 1>for one phone and one phone only, you would you know,

0:16:04.400 --> 0:16:07.680
<v Speaker 1>we're suggesting that Apple creates an iOS that's directly tied

0:16:08.080 --> 0:16:12.800
<v Speaker 1>to a unique identifier on that phone, meaning even if

0:16:12.920 --> 0:16:16.240
<v Speaker 1>the iOS were somehow to leak, it would not be

0:16:16.280 --> 0:16:19.200
<v Speaker 1>applicable to any other device on the market, So it

0:16:19.200 --> 0:16:21.280
<v Speaker 1>could only work for this one phone. So that that

0:16:21.360 --> 0:16:25.760
<v Speaker 1>sounds good in its current form. That's that's important. They

0:16:25.760 --> 0:16:27.760
<v Speaker 1>didn't go so far as to say that that's the

0:16:27.800 --> 0:16:31.720
<v Speaker 1>important part that's left out, But yeah, so that's that

0:16:31.840 --> 0:16:34.840
<v Speaker 1>was reasonable. You could argue saying this is for one

0:16:34.880 --> 0:16:37.960
<v Speaker 1>case only. It's it's an important case. People died as

0:16:37.960 --> 0:16:41.680
<v Speaker 1>a result, extraordinary and we need to have a clear

0:16:41.800 --> 0:16:44.560
<v Speaker 1>timeline because we don't know if there's something what is

0:16:44.560 --> 0:16:48.920
<v Speaker 1>there something planned for December two? Right? Or was there

0:16:48.960 --> 0:16:51.840
<v Speaker 1>another person involved that we need to to get hold

0:16:51.840 --> 0:16:55.440
<v Speaker 1>of because otherwise that this could happen again. Um so

0:16:56.480 --> 0:16:59.880
<v Speaker 1>uh they've said, you know one time only, use gonna

0:17:00.040 --> 0:17:03.440
<v Speaker 1>stroy it. After that use Hey, an Apple, if you

0:17:03.480 --> 0:17:06.520
<v Speaker 1>don't want to make this iOS, that's fine, you don't

0:17:06.560 --> 0:17:09.080
<v Speaker 1>have to do it, will do it. We'll hire some

0:17:09.160 --> 0:17:12.440
<v Speaker 1>people to reverse engineer it, build out an iOS ourselves.

0:17:13.680 --> 0:17:19.040
<v Speaker 1>Here's the thing though, Those iPhones will only verify firmware

0:17:19.480 --> 0:17:23.960
<v Speaker 1>if there's a special Apple digital signature attached to the firmware.

0:17:24.920 --> 0:17:28.199
<v Speaker 1>So in other words, if the digital signature, which is

0:17:28.320 --> 0:17:31.399
<v Speaker 1>unique to Apple, if that's not in there, it won't

0:17:31.400 --> 0:17:34.080
<v Speaker 1>be verified by the device, it won't be loaded on

0:17:34.400 --> 0:17:39.880
<v Speaker 1>because Apple famously wants to make sure that their hardware

0:17:39.880 --> 0:17:43.240
<v Speaker 1>and software works together. And that's it. No one else

0:17:43.280 --> 0:17:46.400
<v Speaker 1>gets to play in that plato. Yeah, it's the same

0:17:46.400 --> 0:17:50.480
<v Speaker 1>with their Matt computers forever, right, Like you were really

0:17:50.520 --> 0:17:54.200
<v Speaker 1>meant to run Apple software on Apple hardware and never

0:17:54.280 --> 0:17:58.880
<v Speaker 1>the Twain shall part. So same thing with this iPhone.

0:17:58.960 --> 0:18:02.120
<v Speaker 1>So the fbis is so we're not even asking you

0:18:02.200 --> 0:18:05.240
<v Speaker 1>to give us the digital signature, which would be disastrous

0:18:05.280 --> 0:18:07.800
<v Speaker 1>if Apple did that. The whole point of the signature

0:18:07.880 --> 0:18:10.919
<v Speaker 1>is to make sure that only Apple can do this stuff.

0:18:11.040 --> 0:18:14.280
<v Speaker 1>What they're saying is will make this iOS, will give

0:18:14.320 --> 0:18:17.720
<v Speaker 1>it to you. Yes, you will sign off and send

0:18:17.760 --> 0:18:20.000
<v Speaker 1>it right. You give a little stamp of approval with

0:18:20.040 --> 0:18:22.480
<v Speaker 1>your little digital signature, and then we can load it

0:18:22.480 --> 0:18:24.560
<v Speaker 1>onto this phone. But that way you don't even have

0:18:24.640 --> 0:18:28.840
<v Speaker 1>to build the code. See we're being really reasonable. So

0:18:30.240 --> 0:18:35.920
<v Speaker 1>here's here's the other issue. Apple kind of shot itself

0:18:35.960 --> 0:18:38.600
<v Speaker 1>in the foot. Uh see, this is kind of a

0:18:38.680 --> 0:18:42.760
<v Speaker 1>workaround already, this idea of being able to to create

0:18:42.800 --> 0:18:46.119
<v Speaker 1>a new kind of firmware to work around the the

0:18:46.160 --> 0:18:50.200
<v Speaker 1>security measures while not affecting any of the underlying data.

0:18:50.400 --> 0:18:52.920
<v Speaker 1>The reason why that's possible at all is that Apple

0:18:53.359 --> 0:18:57.800
<v Speaker 1>has allowed for the possibility of issuing a firmware update

0:18:57.840 --> 0:19:04.800
<v Speaker 1>to a phone without the phones owner having to accept it. Ah. Yes, see,

0:19:04.960 --> 0:19:09.080
<v Speaker 1>if Apple had designed this so that when it pushed

0:19:09.080 --> 0:19:12.439
<v Speaker 1>out a firmware update, you as the user, had to

0:19:12.520 --> 0:19:15.760
<v Speaker 1>log into your phone and accept it, there'd be no

0:19:15.840 --> 0:19:18.199
<v Speaker 1>way for Apple to do this because you already have

0:19:18.280 --> 0:19:21.560
<v Speaker 1>to have the pen in order to accept the update.

0:19:21.960 --> 0:19:24.560
<v Speaker 1>So you can't work your way around the pin, because

0:19:24.600 --> 0:19:26.680
<v Speaker 1>even the update to try and do the workaround would

0:19:26.680 --> 0:19:28.960
<v Speaker 1>still need the PEN. But that's not the case. Apple

0:19:29.119 --> 0:19:34.919
<v Speaker 1>can issue a firmware update without the user's consent. This,

0:19:35.080 --> 0:19:38.639
<v Speaker 1>by the way, also a security problem. Not just a

0:19:38.640 --> 0:19:41.840
<v Speaker 1>security problem in this particular case. But what if someone

0:19:41.880 --> 0:19:44.680
<v Speaker 1>at Apple, you know, decided to code it in so

0:19:44.760 --> 0:19:50.200
<v Speaker 1>that you could activate the microphone remotely. Yeah, and they

0:19:50.240 --> 0:19:53.120
<v Speaker 1>and they shoot this firmware update out and you don't

0:19:53.200 --> 0:19:56.720
<v Speaker 1>have the ability to deny it. You might not even

0:19:56.720 --> 0:19:58.879
<v Speaker 1>be aware that it happens unless you happen to be

0:19:59.000 --> 0:20:01.480
<v Speaker 1>using your phone when the from where update gets pushed

0:20:01.520 --> 0:20:06.600
<v Speaker 1>to your phone. That's an issue. So because Apple can

0:20:06.680 --> 0:20:10.760
<v Speaker 1>do this, that gives FBI the the the leg up

0:20:10.960 --> 0:20:17.520
<v Speaker 1>to make this request. So the FBI just is trying

0:20:17.520 --> 0:20:19.960
<v Speaker 1>to be as reasonable as possible in their request while

0:20:20.200 --> 0:20:25.600
<v Speaker 1>avoiding the addressing the problems that could arise should Apple

0:20:26.680 --> 0:20:33.000
<v Speaker 1>agree to it. And yeah, that's that's the thing. Okay,

0:20:33.040 --> 0:20:39.240
<v Speaker 1>that's that's that's the thing. No matter how single use

0:20:39.480 --> 0:20:45.800
<v Speaker 1>this might be, no matter how noble or even crucial

0:20:45.880 --> 0:20:51.040
<v Speaker 1>to cause, right, there's not there is not a practical

0:20:51.080 --> 0:20:55.480
<v Speaker 1>way that this would work without severe repercussions. Yeah, there's

0:20:55.520 --> 0:20:57.960
<v Speaker 1>a there's a word I like to use in this case.

0:20:57.960 --> 0:21:02.879
<v Speaker 1>It's called precedent. So when you set a precedent where

0:21:02.960 --> 0:21:09.760
<v Speaker 1>Apple agrees, acquiesces, surrenders, is compelled to however you want

0:21:09.800 --> 0:21:16.040
<v Speaker 1>to put it to agree to FBI's demands, you can't

0:21:16.240 --> 0:21:21.840
<v Speaker 1>undo that that has happened. And perhaps more importantly, not

0:21:21.880 --> 0:21:24.840
<v Speaker 1>only hasn't happened in the US government, but now other

0:21:24.960 --> 0:21:29.280
<v Speaker 1>governments that operate where Apple sells products could come to

0:21:29.320 --> 0:21:32.639
<v Speaker 1>Apple and say, we know you can do this because

0:21:32.640 --> 0:21:34.919
<v Speaker 1>you have done it, and we know you will do

0:21:34.960 --> 0:21:37.160
<v Speaker 1>this because you did do it. So if you want

0:21:37.200 --> 0:21:40.160
<v Speaker 1>to do business in our country, you know, the one

0:21:40.240 --> 0:21:44.160
<v Speaker 1>that starts with Chu and ends with Aina, you will

0:21:44.240 --> 0:21:46.240
<v Speaker 1>do this for us. And when you're talking about a

0:21:46.280 --> 0:21:50.080
<v Speaker 1>government like China's government, you could see how this could

0:21:50.200 --> 0:21:55.439
<v Speaker 1>be used to to an abusive extent. Anyone who is

0:21:55.480 --> 0:22:00.080
<v Speaker 1>identified as a dissident could be targeted. And China's an

0:22:00.240 --> 0:22:05.160
<v Speaker 1>enormous market. Right, Apple cannot, as a publicly traded company,

0:22:05.400 --> 0:22:09.560
<v Speaker 1>turn its back on the biggest emerging market in the world.

0:22:09.800 --> 0:22:13.760
<v Speaker 1>Not even emerging, it's emerged. The biggest market in the world. Also,

0:22:13.840 --> 0:22:18.120
<v Speaker 1>it's a their manufacturing basis for apples in China. That's

0:22:18.160 --> 0:22:20.480
<v Speaker 1>part of it. That's already been a security concern. Let's

0:22:20.480 --> 0:22:25.640
<v Speaker 1>also consider I mean, if we're being honest, Okay, how

0:22:25.720 --> 0:22:30.119
<v Speaker 1>how do I say this correctly? U Jonathan um Oh? Yes, Okay.

0:22:30.840 --> 0:22:36.680
<v Speaker 1>While there is no universally acknowledged proof that corporate corporate

0:22:36.840 --> 0:22:42.040
<v Speaker 1>espionage projects or operations coming from China are sponsored by

0:22:42.080 --> 0:22:50.040
<v Speaker 1>the government, there is widespread certitude that that is the case.

0:22:50.720 --> 0:22:54.439
<v Speaker 1>Razor right right, Ockom's Razor. You you look at it

0:22:54.480 --> 0:22:58.240
<v Speaker 1>and you think, okay, it is entirely possible that any

0:22:58.280 --> 0:23:03.400
<v Speaker 1>hackers operating in China. One, maybe they're not Chinese, unlikely,

0:23:03.480 --> 0:23:07.440
<v Speaker 1>but possible to Maybe they're operating from a different country

0:23:07.560 --> 0:23:11.000
<v Speaker 1>and using proxies to go through China. But considering the

0:23:11.080 --> 0:23:15.640
<v Speaker 1>firewall of China, that seems like that be extra headache

0:23:15.960 --> 0:23:19.880
<v Speaker 1>for those hackers. Three they could be operating. They could

0:23:19.920 --> 0:23:23.040
<v Speaker 1>be Chinese and operating in China but not be directed

0:23:23.040 --> 0:23:26.160
<v Speaker 1>by the Chinese government, in which case they would still

0:23:26.200 --> 0:23:30.760
<v Speaker 1>have to use proxies in order to access that level

0:23:30.800 --> 0:23:32.760
<v Speaker 1>of infrastructure. It just gets to a point where you

0:23:32.800 --> 0:23:35.880
<v Speaker 1>think the simplest explanation is, in fact, there are these

0:23:35.920 --> 0:23:39.360
<v Speaker 1>state backed hackers that are are doing this on behalf

0:23:39.640 --> 0:23:42.119
<v Speaker 1>or on the request of Chinese government. If not on

0:23:42.160 --> 0:23:46.640
<v Speaker 1>the request, at least with the the implicit approval there

0:23:46.640 --> 0:23:48.480
<v Speaker 1>we go at least someone looking the other way. But

0:23:48.520 --> 0:23:51.520
<v Speaker 1>even that's not enough. There's assistance involved anyway. I'm I'm

0:23:51.600 --> 0:23:54.840
<v Speaker 1>derailing us well. The point being that if if Apple

0:23:54.880 --> 0:23:58.240
<v Speaker 1>were to agree to this FBI request, that is a

0:23:58.280 --> 0:24:01.480
<v Speaker 1>distinct possibility that it would face not only future requests

0:24:01.560 --> 0:24:05.800
<v Speaker 1>from UH from other government agencies as well as the FBI,

0:24:06.160 --> 0:24:09.000
<v Speaker 1>but from other countries as well, and that it would

0:24:09.200 --> 0:24:12.959
<v Speaker 1>it would be the wedge that drives open the possibility

0:24:12.960 --> 0:24:15.640
<v Speaker 1>of things like these back doors that Apple and other

0:24:15.640 --> 0:24:19.600
<v Speaker 1>companies have been resisting for years now. There is one

0:24:19.600 --> 0:24:21.399
<v Speaker 1>other there. There is a case that I think we

0:24:21.400 --> 0:24:25.240
<v Speaker 1>should clarify here. Um when we talk about precedent, there

0:24:25.320 --> 0:24:29.000
<v Speaker 1>have been precedents in the in the legal past wherein

0:24:29.680 --> 0:24:35.119
<v Speaker 1>Uncle Sam was allowed to compel a company right to

0:24:35.320 --> 0:24:37.359
<v Speaker 1>do and this is different, but we do need to

0:24:37.520 --> 0:24:40.919
<v Speaker 1>I think we need to differentiate these because it is

0:24:41.080 --> 0:24:45.920
<v Speaker 1>legal in the US to compel a third party, whether

0:24:45.960 --> 0:24:50.800
<v Speaker 1>an individual or a corporation to um help, how do

0:24:50.880 --> 0:24:54.240
<v Speaker 1>they word it? Like execute a court order or something like. Yeah,

0:24:54.280 --> 0:24:57.520
<v Speaker 1>so you're you're talking about the All Writs Act, right,

0:24:57.680 --> 0:25:03.400
<v Speaker 1>which is a very old thing, back to seventeen eighty nine. Okay,

0:25:03.560 --> 0:25:06.080
<v Speaker 1>the US wasn't even the US very much right there,

0:25:06.200 --> 0:25:10.520
<v Speaker 1>right nine. This is not a smart phone specific law.

0:25:10.640 --> 0:25:14.399
<v Speaker 1>There were still occasional battles with the British going on, okay,

0:25:14.520 --> 0:25:20.080
<v Speaker 1>seventeen nine, yet many of them were not here yet. Yeah,

0:25:20.160 --> 0:25:23.800
<v Speaker 1>seventeen eighty nine is when this writ was was first

0:25:24.480 --> 0:25:29.200
<v Speaker 1>written down as part of the Judiciary Act Um. So specifically,

0:25:29.240 --> 0:25:31.720
<v Speaker 1>what the all Ritz Act allows the government to do

0:25:31.920 --> 0:25:35.520
<v Speaker 1>is to compel a third party to accommodate federal orders

0:25:35.560 --> 0:25:39.520
<v Speaker 1>like a search warrant. So, in other words, the federal

0:25:39.560 --> 0:25:42.680
<v Speaker 1>government can issue a search warrant to law enforcement. The

0:25:42.760 --> 0:25:45.919
<v Speaker 1>law enforcement can go to let's say it's an apartment building.

0:25:45.960 --> 0:25:48.560
<v Speaker 1>They can go to the manager of the apartment building

0:25:48.560 --> 0:25:51.080
<v Speaker 1>and say, we have the search warrant. The all Ritz

0:25:51.119 --> 0:25:53.879
<v Speaker 1>Act tells us that you have to allow us to

0:25:54.000 --> 0:25:57.000
<v Speaker 1>go into this apartment to search it. And then the

0:25:57.040 --> 0:25:59.880
<v Speaker 1>apartment owners says all right and lets them in. Now,

0:26:00.000 --> 0:26:04.119
<v Speaker 1>this serves a couple of different purposes. It expedites, uh,

0:26:04.280 --> 0:26:07.879
<v Speaker 1>the the work of the federal government in in investigations

0:26:07.880 --> 0:26:10.359
<v Speaker 1>and things of that nature, and it also provides a

0:26:10.400 --> 0:26:13.760
<v Speaker 1>protection to those third parties because the third party is

0:26:13.800 --> 0:26:18.840
<v Speaker 1>having to comply with a federal request. And if you

0:26:18.880 --> 0:26:23.840
<v Speaker 1>are a person like an apartment manager and your other

0:26:23.880 --> 0:26:25.800
<v Speaker 1>tenants are coming to you and saying, why are you

0:26:25.880 --> 0:26:29.720
<v Speaker 1>letting them into someone's room without their permission? You can

0:26:29.720 --> 0:26:33.160
<v Speaker 1>say I have to buy law that protects you as

0:26:33.160 --> 0:26:36.000
<v Speaker 1>the owner as well, because it means that you're not

0:26:36.280 --> 0:26:39.120
<v Speaker 1>you're not you're not a rat. You know, you're you're

0:26:39.200 --> 0:26:42.239
<v Speaker 1>you're following the law, you're obeying the law. Right, so

0:26:42.280 --> 0:26:46.120
<v Speaker 1>automatically anything you do in the assistance of the execution

0:26:46.160 --> 0:26:51.399
<v Speaker 1>of that court order is automatically legal. I mean, as

0:26:51.480 --> 0:26:54.440
<v Speaker 1>long as you're as as long as they're not saying, hey,

0:26:54.480 --> 0:26:56.640
<v Speaker 1>we need a search war and you go sure, hey,

0:26:56.680 --> 0:26:59.000
<v Speaker 1>while I'm on the way, do you might ave steal

0:26:59.040 --> 0:27:02.080
<v Speaker 1>a car? Right? Or they'll be or they can't say, hey,

0:27:02.080 --> 0:27:03.920
<v Speaker 1>we're going to get a search warrant. Do you want

0:27:03.920 --> 0:27:08.359
<v Speaker 1>to just listen? Now? That would not be cool. But

0:27:09.400 --> 0:27:13.440
<v Speaker 1>there's a very important idea that's attached to this all

0:27:13.520 --> 0:27:16.919
<v Speaker 1>Ritz Act, which is that and the Supreme Court has

0:27:17.000 --> 0:27:21.399
<v Speaker 1>ruled on this you cannot rely on the all Ritz

0:27:21.400 --> 0:27:24.720
<v Speaker 1>Act to compel a third party to action if it

0:27:24.800 --> 0:27:30.960
<v Speaker 1>creates an unreasonable burden upon that party. So you might say, well,

0:27:30.960 --> 0:27:33.680
<v Speaker 1>what's the unreasonable burden for Apple? I mean, all they're

0:27:33.720 --> 0:27:37.560
<v Speaker 1>asking for is a way around this security system, just

0:27:37.600 --> 0:27:40.720
<v Speaker 1>one time, just a fun time, just the one time.

0:27:40.760 --> 0:27:46.160
<v Speaker 1>So there are actually several counter arguments to this um. First, uh,

0:27:46.400 --> 0:27:49.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, Apple is saying their programmers may not even

0:27:49.960 --> 0:27:53.359
<v Speaker 1>know how to make the code that would allow for

0:27:53.400 --> 0:27:55.719
<v Speaker 1>this to happen. They like, listen, we don't even know

0:27:55.760 --> 0:27:59.000
<v Speaker 1>that we can build this yet, So you're asking us

0:27:59.040 --> 0:28:01.040
<v Speaker 1>to do something that we don't know we can build.

0:28:01.800 --> 0:28:04.359
<v Speaker 1>So that's an unreasonable burden because it means we have

0:28:04.440 --> 0:28:08.679
<v Speaker 1>to dedicate our assets to from from projects that they

0:28:08.680 --> 0:28:11.359
<v Speaker 1>should be working on to trying to figure out if

0:28:11.400 --> 0:28:13.679
<v Speaker 1>this thing is possible and if so, how to do

0:28:13.760 --> 0:28:17.080
<v Speaker 1>it now. The FBI's argument was essentially, Hey, you're in

0:28:17.119 --> 0:28:21.480
<v Speaker 1>the business of writing codes. There should be no problem.

0:28:21.520 --> 0:28:26.520
<v Speaker 1>I would desperately need a bleep sound effect right now,

0:28:26.560 --> 0:28:29.360
<v Speaker 1>but I call b S. Let's be nice I'll call

0:28:29.440 --> 0:28:32.680
<v Speaker 1>bs on that argument, because to me, that's the same

0:28:32.720 --> 0:28:35.240
<v Speaker 1>as coming up to Let's say, let's say Ben that

0:28:35.280 --> 0:28:39.120
<v Speaker 1>you are a cook, yes, and you cook in an

0:28:39.120 --> 0:28:43.120
<v Speaker 1>Italian restaurant. You're you're the Italian restaurant's head cook. Three

0:28:43.120 --> 0:28:46.280
<v Speaker 1>initial int. I go up to you and I say, hey, listen,

0:28:46.320 --> 0:28:49.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm from the federal government. I got this, uh this

0:28:49.720 --> 0:28:55.440
<v Speaker 1>this executive order, this federal order for you. You have

0:28:55.560 --> 0:28:59.560
<v Speaker 1>to now go and make a dinner of Peruvian food

0:29:00.240 --> 0:29:03.160
<v Speaker 1>right now for thirty people that are in the restaurant.

0:29:03.680 --> 0:29:06.600
<v Speaker 1>You can do it because you cook right exactly, or

0:29:06.720 --> 0:29:10.160
<v Speaker 1>it's like saying, yeah, um, it would be a disastrous

0:29:10.200 --> 0:29:13.400
<v Speaker 1>proving dinner at very least a loose interpretation. So like

0:29:13.600 --> 0:29:17.400
<v Speaker 1>for another example, let's say to make it even broader,

0:29:17.920 --> 0:29:22.000
<v Speaker 1>because I think this is this is pretty good too. So, uh, Jonathan,

0:29:22.200 --> 0:29:27.240
<v Speaker 1>let's say that you are a doctor. All right, okay,

0:29:27.400 --> 0:29:31.360
<v Speaker 1>you're at your doctor, doctor Strickland, doctor. Hey call me Jonathan,

0:29:31.360 --> 0:29:37.680
<v Speaker 1>doctor Stricklands. My dad. You So you're an easy going doctor, clearly, um,

0:29:37.800 --> 0:29:41.680
<v Speaker 1>and you are, and uh you're an ear nose and

0:29:41.720 --> 0:29:46.720
<v Speaker 1>throat man. And uh so I come up to you

0:29:46.760 --> 0:29:50.000
<v Speaker 1>and I say, I'm from the federal government. I have

0:29:50.080 --> 0:29:53.440
<v Speaker 1>an executive order, but not an appointment. So you're already

0:29:53.480 --> 0:29:57.400
<v Speaker 1>kind of irritated. And I'm like, and I say, I

0:29:57.440 --> 0:30:02.480
<v Speaker 1>need you to make the cure for answer that's a

0:30:02.480 --> 0:30:05.000
<v Speaker 1>bit much. Yeah, I mean you're a doctor, right, you

0:30:05.000 --> 0:30:08.960
<v Speaker 1>know about organs and stuff cancer affects bodies. Or going

0:30:09.000 --> 0:30:12.560
<v Speaker 1>to Harley Davidson Davidson and saying, look, you you make

0:30:12.680 --> 0:30:16.160
<v Speaker 1>stuff where wheels are connected to chassisas and they turn

0:30:16.280 --> 0:30:18.440
<v Speaker 1>and a motor keeps things going. I need you to

0:30:18.480 --> 0:30:22.040
<v Speaker 1>make a bus. I mean, you see where the where

0:30:22.040 --> 0:30:26.480
<v Speaker 1>it's ridiculous. It's it's you can't argue that because this

0:30:26.640 --> 0:30:29.120
<v Speaker 1>company is in the business of doing this one thing,

0:30:29.120 --> 0:30:31.560
<v Speaker 1>which by the way, is just one part of Apple's business,

0:30:32.280 --> 0:30:35.080
<v Speaker 1>that they are capable of making this other thing that

0:30:35.160 --> 0:30:37.920
<v Speaker 1>happens to fall into that same category. That is ludicrous

0:30:37.920 --> 0:30:39.600
<v Speaker 1>on the face of it. So that's argument number one

0:30:40.080 --> 0:30:44.040
<v Speaker 1>about it being a burden. Okay. The second burden is

0:30:44.040 --> 0:30:46.440
<v Speaker 1>the one that we've already touched on. It sets a precedent.

0:30:46.520 --> 0:30:49.040
<v Speaker 1>If Apple can be forced to attack the security of

0:30:49.080 --> 0:30:52.160
<v Speaker 1>its own system in this case, it can happen again,

0:30:52.400 --> 0:30:57.240
<v Speaker 1>and that would be a disastrous result for consumer Uh,

0:30:57.280 --> 0:31:00.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, confidence in Apple's products that very bad for

0:31:00.720 --> 0:31:03.200
<v Speaker 1>apples bottom line. So if Apple says, look, you will

0:31:03.280 --> 0:31:08.200
<v Speaker 1>make us lose millions, if not billions of dollars in revenue,

0:31:08.480 --> 0:31:11.880
<v Speaker 1>how is that not an unreasonable burden? How can you

0:31:12.040 --> 0:31:16.840
<v Speaker 1>argue that that burden is reasonable? Right? And that's so,

0:31:17.040 --> 0:31:18.880
<v Speaker 1>And not only that, but then you get into the

0:31:18.880 --> 0:31:24.400
<v Speaker 1>the foreign agent approach, the foreign state approach, saying what

0:31:24.520 --> 0:31:26.840
<v Speaker 1>if this means that China comes to us and says,

0:31:26.960 --> 0:31:29.680
<v Speaker 1>because of this other thing that we agreed to do,

0:31:29.960 --> 0:31:32.120
<v Speaker 1>we now have to do it in China all the time,

0:31:32.800 --> 0:31:38.640
<v Speaker 1>and real human beings are being pursued, and uh, their

0:31:38.680 --> 0:31:41.720
<v Speaker 1>lives are are turned upside down and ruined as a

0:31:41.720 --> 0:31:44.440
<v Speaker 1>result of it. And it's all because we have to

0:31:44.520 --> 0:31:47.360
<v Speaker 1>comply because this has already set a precedent. That's an

0:31:47.440 --> 0:31:52.520
<v Speaker 1>that's an unreasonable burden. And finally, they've even said that

0:31:52.600 --> 0:31:56.360
<v Speaker 1>it's a violation of their right to free speech. And

0:31:56.400 --> 0:31:59.120
<v Speaker 1>the reason for that is because code has been ruled

0:31:59.240 --> 0:32:01.800
<v Speaker 1>as a type of free speech in the past. And

0:32:02.200 --> 0:32:06.280
<v Speaker 1>if the government compels Apple to write code that Apple

0:32:06.480 --> 0:32:11.400
<v Speaker 1>doesn't believe in, they're being compelled to speak against their

0:32:11.400 --> 0:32:15.800
<v Speaker 1>own beliefs, thus a violation of free speech. Now that argument,

0:32:15.880 --> 0:32:18.080
<v Speaker 1>most people are saying it's probably the weakest of all

0:32:18.120 --> 0:32:20.400
<v Speaker 1>of their styling on it a little, but I gotta

0:32:20.440 --> 0:32:24.120
<v Speaker 1>admit that's pretty awesome style. Well, yeah, that is. I

0:32:24.120 --> 0:32:27.640
<v Speaker 1>I enjoy it. And there, while it's reaching, it's not invalid.

0:32:27.960 --> 0:32:33.320
<v Speaker 1>And let's consider that Apple legally, in this kind of

0:32:33.360 --> 0:32:38.640
<v Speaker 1>case is playing against Uncle Sam and on its home territory, right.

0:32:38.880 --> 0:32:43.160
<v Speaker 1>And this means that you you might often wonder why

0:32:43.280 --> 0:32:46.920
<v Speaker 1>when the air suits or countersuits are legal problems, why

0:32:47.000 --> 0:32:51.400
<v Speaker 1>so many cases open with just this laundry list of arguments.

0:32:51.640 --> 0:32:54.640
<v Speaker 1>And it's because it's, um, you know, if we could

0:32:54.680 --> 0:32:58.920
<v Speaker 1>go back to my Italian restaurant, Uh, you're just throwing

0:32:58.920 --> 0:33:01.360
<v Speaker 1>the spaghetti at the wall. It's a scattered gun approach,

0:33:03.080 --> 0:33:05.800
<v Speaker 1>or if you prefer, it's casting a very wide net

0:33:05.840 --> 0:33:10.000
<v Speaker 1>because you aren't sure which tactic is necessarily going to

0:33:10.040 --> 0:33:12.240
<v Speaker 1>be your best one from the starting gate, so you

0:33:12.240 --> 0:33:14.880
<v Speaker 1>want to throw out all of them at once. And

0:33:14.920 --> 0:33:17.640
<v Speaker 1>if it's if it's a compelling enough argument, then you

0:33:17.680 --> 0:33:21.640
<v Speaker 1>can get things thrown out before they go any further. Um.

0:33:21.760 --> 0:33:24.920
<v Speaker 1>And in fact, Apple has said that they're willing to

0:33:24.960 --> 0:33:26.920
<v Speaker 1>go all the way to the Supreme Court with this

0:33:26.960 --> 0:33:31.400
<v Speaker 1>particular fight. The CEO said that publicly. Yeah, which interesting

0:33:31.400 --> 0:33:35.880
<v Speaker 1>because I you know, uh, we recently lost a U. S.

0:33:35.880 --> 0:33:38.920
<v Speaker 1>Supreme Court justice here in the United States, and I

0:33:38.960 --> 0:33:41.080
<v Speaker 1>actually think he probably would have sided with Apple on

0:33:41.120 --> 0:33:45.760
<v Speaker 1>this one because of his his very strict view of

0:33:45.800 --> 0:33:51.520
<v Speaker 1>the Constitution, an originalist Anton. Yeah. So, uh, going back

0:33:51.680 --> 0:33:53.959
<v Speaker 1>to this argument of it, I'm going to read a quote,

0:33:54.000 --> 0:33:56.960
<v Speaker 1>and I want to see what your reaction is, because

0:33:56.960 --> 0:34:00.360
<v Speaker 1>I know what mine was. This is from congress spend

0:34:00.480 --> 0:34:06.160
<v Speaker 1>David Jolly of Florida, who said Apple's leadership risks having

0:34:06.200 --> 0:34:11.040
<v Speaker 1>blood on their hands. Ben is shaking his head and

0:34:11.120 --> 0:34:14.800
<v Speaker 1>looking at me in disdain. Not at me, he's looking

0:34:14.840 --> 0:34:19.440
<v Speaker 1>through me. It's absolutely insincere, first off, and it's usually

0:34:19.960 --> 0:34:26.880
<v Speaker 1>whenever you listeners, whenever you hear people make lurid imagery

0:34:26.960 --> 0:34:35.280
<v Speaker 1>based appeals to emotion, right, or these these hyperbolic accusations

0:34:35.680 --> 0:34:40.360
<v Speaker 1>that this is the bread and butter of I'll say it, uh,

0:34:40.520 --> 0:34:44.960
<v Speaker 1>the political class, which political theater exactly. That's a great phrase.

0:34:45.040 --> 0:34:48.719
<v Speaker 1>And so to to say this in such a way.

0:34:49.120 --> 0:34:52.360
<v Speaker 1>What it does is psychologically you get an image of

0:34:52.400 --> 0:34:56.759
<v Speaker 1>somebody with with literal blood on their hands. And then

0:34:57.160 --> 0:35:01.319
<v Speaker 1>you know they're trying to cast aspersion against Apple, not

0:35:01.480 --> 0:35:05.600
<v Speaker 1>by not by making any point about the arguments Apple

0:35:05.719 --> 0:35:10.480
<v Speaker 1>is making, but by going instantly to, uh, these people

0:35:10.480 --> 0:35:13.120
<v Speaker 1>are murderers, right if we don't do why why are

0:35:13.120 --> 0:35:18.240
<v Speaker 1>you defending murderers? That's that's that's essentially you know, uh,

0:35:18.360 --> 0:35:21.720
<v Speaker 1>the argument about you know, it's it's one of those

0:35:21.800 --> 0:35:24.160
<v Speaker 1>those legal arguments you will hear occasionally. This is an

0:35:24.160 --> 0:35:26.120
<v Speaker 1>I legal argument, but it's like the legal arguments you

0:35:26.120 --> 0:35:28.960
<v Speaker 1>will occasionally here where it's clear that the lawyer is

0:35:28.960 --> 0:35:32.239
<v Speaker 1>trying to appeal to the jury's sense of emotion as

0:35:32.239 --> 0:35:35.760
<v Speaker 1>opposed to addressing the facts of the case itself. UM

0:35:35.840 --> 0:35:38.680
<v Speaker 1>So I agree entirely with you. The first reaction I

0:35:38.760 --> 0:35:43.600
<v Speaker 1>had was I'm offended by that statement. I mean, it's condescending,

0:35:44.000 --> 0:35:47.480
<v Speaker 1>and it imagines that it imagines that the person that

0:35:47.600 --> 0:35:51.120
<v Speaker 1>would be swayed by that is not intelligent enough to read,

0:35:51.400 --> 0:35:55.279
<v Speaker 1>and it it deflects the fact that there are two

0:35:55.320 --> 0:36:01.200
<v Speaker 1>people who were responsible for that terrible exam attack, that

0:36:01.440 --> 0:36:03.759
<v Speaker 1>two people, and those two people are the people who

0:36:03.800 --> 0:36:05.800
<v Speaker 1>are holding the guns and pulling the trigger and aiming

0:36:05.840 --> 0:36:07.840
<v Speaker 1>at people. Those those are the ones who have blood

0:36:07.840 --> 0:36:10.000
<v Speaker 1>on their hands, and of course they're they're both dead now.

0:36:10.080 --> 0:36:12.600
<v Speaker 1>They both died in the shootout with the law enforcement.

0:36:13.800 --> 0:36:17.480
<v Speaker 1>But the point being that they're the ones responsible, not Apple.

0:36:17.520 --> 0:36:21.000
<v Speaker 1>Apple did nothing in relation to this crime. In fact,

0:36:21.280 --> 0:36:25.160
<v Speaker 1>Apple didn't give the freaking phone to Fruit that was

0:36:25.480 --> 0:36:28.920
<v Speaker 1>issued by the county. Apple just made some made a

0:36:28.960 --> 0:36:31.960
<v Speaker 1>device that has this level of security on it that

0:36:32.040 --> 0:36:34.799
<v Speaker 1>people wanted. People wanted that level of security. They want

0:36:35.080 --> 0:36:39.879
<v Speaker 1>the reassurance that Apple itself can't access their phones without

0:36:39.920 --> 0:36:45.279
<v Speaker 1>their permission. It's a very important cornerstone of security. In fact,

0:36:45.320 --> 0:36:48.360
<v Speaker 1>if you look at iOS eight or earlier, Apple could

0:36:48.400 --> 0:36:52.239
<v Speaker 1>bypass security. They could they could access the information on

0:36:52.320 --> 0:36:57.440
<v Speaker 1>a phone without your pen, without you acquiescing and allowing

0:36:57.480 --> 0:37:01.839
<v Speaker 1>that to happen. But they specifically change that with iOS nine.

0:37:02.320 --> 0:37:04.640
<v Speaker 1>They made it so that they could not do that

0:37:04.719 --> 0:37:09.600
<v Speaker 1>because they said, it's important for consumers to trust the company.

0:37:10.239 --> 0:37:12.360
<v Speaker 1>And how can you build trust if you know, in

0:37:12.400 --> 0:37:14.359
<v Speaker 1>the back of your mind this company could at any

0:37:14.440 --> 0:37:19.760
<v Speaker 1>moment access my private information that I have not chosen

0:37:19.800 --> 0:37:23.600
<v Speaker 1>to share with them. Uh, well, you know that trust

0:37:23.680 --> 0:37:26.880
<v Speaker 1>is destroyed in that case. That kind of brings us

0:37:26.880 --> 0:37:32.080
<v Speaker 1>back to that unreasonable burden. So the these arguments are continuing.

0:37:32.239 --> 0:37:35.560
<v Speaker 1>Uh I think the next stage doesn't start unill till

0:37:35.600 --> 0:37:40.480
<v Speaker 1>March ten um, and we're recording this on February. So

0:37:42.040 --> 0:37:46.840
<v Speaker 1>I I am very hopeful that the government sides with

0:37:46.880 --> 0:37:49.680
<v Speaker 1>Apple on this ultimately that when this gets the courts

0:37:49.719 --> 0:37:53.200
<v Speaker 1>at any rate side with Apple on this, because if

0:37:53.239 --> 0:37:57.279
<v Speaker 1>they do not, this is the This could be like

0:37:57.440 --> 0:38:01.120
<v Speaker 1>the snowball effect where we see more or requests of

0:38:01.160 --> 0:38:04.640
<v Speaker 1>this nature come in and then once it once it's

0:38:04.680 --> 0:38:07.880
<v Speaker 1>been established as precedent, it's much easier to happen in

0:38:07.880 --> 0:38:12.640
<v Speaker 1>the future, and it's easier to see larger requests like

0:38:12.719 --> 0:38:14.880
<v Speaker 1>things that are that go beyond all we need you

0:38:14.920 --> 0:38:17.920
<v Speaker 1>to help us circumvent the security and may go into

0:38:18.000 --> 0:38:20.000
<v Speaker 1>we need you. We finally are going to get what

0:38:20.040 --> 0:38:22.880
<v Speaker 1>we wanted all this time. We want a direct path

0:38:24.160 --> 0:38:27.520
<v Speaker 1>that like a doorway that's labeled FBI that lets us

0:38:27.560 --> 0:38:31.000
<v Speaker 1>go straight into the data that your users are storing

0:38:31.040 --> 0:38:34.279
<v Speaker 1>on their devices, which leads to because the FBI, this

0:38:34.360 --> 0:38:38.800
<v Speaker 1>leads to a horrific situation because the FBI is an

0:38:38.840 --> 0:38:43.040
<v Speaker 1>institution sure made up of individuals. Remember when the Snowden

0:38:43.120 --> 0:38:46.960
<v Speaker 1>leaks revealed to us the extent of unethical use of

0:38:47.000 --> 0:38:49.319
<v Speaker 1>surveillance by the n s A. People would look up

0:38:49.320 --> 0:38:52.719
<v Speaker 1>their ex girlfriends or they were stark ex boyfriends. Yeah,

0:38:52.760 --> 0:38:55.160
<v Speaker 1>they were just looking up people that they were interested

0:38:55.200 --> 0:38:58.160
<v Speaker 1>in with absolutely no oversight. As a matter of fact,

0:38:58.360 --> 0:39:03.239
<v Speaker 1>when we talked about the Chinese government looking the other

0:39:03.280 --> 0:39:07.520
<v Speaker 1>way for hackers, that was the same thing that occurred

0:39:07.560 --> 0:39:12.600
<v Speaker 1>with the n s A. To to to assume that,

0:39:12.680 --> 0:39:17.120
<v Speaker 1>for some reason, given the opportunity, individuals in another law

0:39:17.239 --> 0:39:21.560
<v Speaker 1>enforcement branch or another institution would not do the same

0:39:21.600 --> 0:39:25.960
<v Speaker 1>thing is cartoonishly naive, you know. Using the argument of

0:39:26.040 --> 0:39:28.120
<v Speaker 1>this is a one time use, that wouldn't stop the

0:39:28.160 --> 0:39:31.359
<v Speaker 1>FBI from requesting another one time use, or another one

0:39:31.360 --> 0:39:34.480
<v Speaker 1>time use, or even extending that beyond it, saying all

0:39:34.560 --> 0:39:37.920
<v Speaker 1>right now, we want a one size fits all approach

0:39:38.000 --> 0:39:40.080
<v Speaker 1>to doing the same thing because it's too much time

0:39:40.120 --> 0:39:42.799
<v Speaker 1>for us. And don't worry, we'll get a court order

0:39:42.880 --> 0:39:46.160
<v Speaker 1>before we do it. We'll make sure that nobody else

0:39:46.200 --> 0:39:48.880
<v Speaker 1>gets access to this ability, and you'll know that the

0:39:48.920 --> 0:39:53.239
<v Speaker 1>court order is good because they'll be classified. So we'll

0:39:53.239 --> 0:39:55.640
<v Speaker 1>just inform you when the orders are approved. I have

0:39:55.680 --> 0:39:58.480
<v Speaker 1>said it many times that there is no way to

0:39:58.600 --> 0:40:03.560
<v Speaker 1>ensure security by enforcing a vulnerability. Yeah, and I think

0:40:03.600 --> 0:40:06.600
<v Speaker 1>that's a student way to encapsulate it. But there is

0:40:06.640 --> 0:40:09.120
<v Speaker 1>a question that I have that I'm sure a lot

0:40:09.160 --> 0:40:11.719
<v Speaker 1>of you have as well, ladies and gentlemen, which is,

0:40:12.560 --> 0:40:17.880
<v Speaker 1>let's say the worst happens. Worst happens, court rules in

0:40:18.080 --> 0:40:22.920
<v Speaker 1>favor of the FBI, and Apple says, no, we're not

0:40:22.960 --> 0:40:27.360
<v Speaker 1>going to do it. Well, I mean if if the court,

0:40:27.880 --> 0:40:29.800
<v Speaker 1>assuming he goes all the way up to the Supreme Court,

0:40:30.440 --> 0:40:33.080
<v Speaker 1>this could end up becoming a matter of law where

0:40:33.680 --> 0:40:37.960
<v Speaker 1>it's codified that companies have to obey that within the

0:40:38.040 --> 0:40:42.040
<v Speaker 1>United States, which would mean far reaching implications, not just

0:40:42.080 --> 0:40:46.440
<v Speaker 1>for Apple, but for all companies everyone, any any tech company,

0:40:46.480 --> 0:40:49.839
<v Speaker 1>any company, really, any company doing business in the US,

0:40:49.960 --> 0:40:54.000
<v Speaker 1>not even based here, because doing business so that's a

0:40:54.040 --> 0:40:59.680
<v Speaker 1>big deal. It's it's potentially disastrous for privacy. Uh, there's

0:41:00.040 --> 0:41:03.839
<v Speaker 1>ampen possibilities of misuse. We've talked about the possibility that

0:41:03.920 --> 0:41:08.920
<v Speaker 1>if you do create a vulnerability, someone somewhere is going

0:41:08.960 --> 0:41:11.520
<v Speaker 1>to try and figure out a way to also gain

0:41:11.560 --> 0:41:15.080
<v Speaker 1>access to that vulnerability. And these are not necessarily other

0:41:15.840 --> 0:41:20.520
<v Speaker 1>law agencies or intelligence agencies, or maybe they are intelligence agencies.

0:41:20.640 --> 0:41:22.759
<v Speaker 1>They just have to be intelligence agencies working for a

0:41:22.760 --> 0:41:25.759
<v Speaker 1>different country. And yeah, and here's the problem, because we've

0:41:25.800 --> 0:41:30.000
<v Speaker 1>talked about this before, man, I legislation, I think we

0:41:30.040 --> 0:41:33.960
<v Speaker 1>talked about this with autonomous vehicles before. Legislation is almost

0:41:34.000 --> 0:41:38.920
<v Speaker 1>always outpaced by technological innovation. Yes, yeah, but you will

0:41:38.920 --> 0:41:42.160
<v Speaker 1>almost always see a case where someone has figured out

0:41:42.200 --> 0:41:45.000
<v Speaker 1>something really interesting to do with technology, or perhaps even

0:41:45.080 --> 0:41:48.200
<v Speaker 1>really scary things they could do with technology, and there

0:41:48.200 --> 0:41:51.000
<v Speaker 1>are no laws to cover it because before that person

0:41:51.040 --> 0:41:53.600
<v Speaker 1>figured it out, it didn't exist. So you don't write

0:41:53.640 --> 0:41:55.759
<v Speaker 1>laws for stuff that doesn't exist. We don't have a

0:41:55.840 --> 0:42:00.000
<v Speaker 1>law saying listen, guys, I just I just it's keep

0:42:00.120 --> 0:42:01.759
<v Speaker 1>me up at night. We have got to write a

0:42:01.840 --> 0:42:05.600
<v Speaker 1>law about what happens in the case that the Lockness

0:42:05.600 --> 0:42:08.560
<v Speaker 1>Monster is real, gets out of Scotland, comes over to

0:42:08.600 --> 0:42:10.680
<v Speaker 1>New Jersey and starts to eat people. We need a

0:42:10.760 --> 0:42:17.239
<v Speaker 1>law to protect us from this potential catastrophe. Iculous. Yeah,

0:42:17.280 --> 0:42:20.120
<v Speaker 1>Like if we're senators, everyone in the audience and you,

0:42:20.239 --> 0:42:24.200
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan myself, and then one of us walks in and says, guys,

0:42:24.239 --> 0:42:26.960
<v Speaker 1>I know that, uh, I know that we have some

0:42:27.000 --> 0:42:29.719
<v Speaker 1>other issues coming up, and we have to nominate this

0:42:29.920 --> 0:42:33.759
<v Speaker 1>Court justice, and there's an election coming up. But I

0:42:33.800 --> 0:42:36.279
<v Speaker 1>think we need to look into the future and look

0:42:36.280 --> 0:42:39.520
<v Speaker 1>at the big picture, which is moon boot theft right,

0:42:40.280 --> 0:42:43.439
<v Speaker 1>because I don't want people shoelace on the moon when

0:42:43.480 --> 0:42:46.600
<v Speaker 1>and if we build a colony there. I think arguing example,

0:42:47.440 --> 0:42:49.840
<v Speaker 1>for example, for robot rights right now might be a

0:42:49.840 --> 0:42:53.040
<v Speaker 1>little premature that kind of thing. Maybe not forever, but

0:42:53.160 --> 0:42:55.480
<v Speaker 1>for now, it's definitely it's good to think about. But

0:42:55.760 --> 0:42:59.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, you make a very astute point when you say,

0:43:00.040 --> 0:43:02.960
<v Speaker 1>if we're talking about codifying something, we codifying a law,

0:43:03.280 --> 0:43:07.680
<v Speaker 1>then what what happens is once the Supreme Court rules

0:43:07.719 --> 0:43:11.880
<v Speaker 1>on something like this and it becomes a matter of law,

0:43:12.200 --> 0:43:15.080
<v Speaker 1>it is much It is very, very difficult to get

0:43:15.120 --> 0:43:19.000
<v Speaker 1>that kind of ruling. The Supremes are pretty busy people.

0:43:19.800 --> 0:43:22.560
<v Speaker 1>They don't hear every case that's brought before. They absolutely don't.

0:43:22.600 --> 0:43:25.640
<v Speaker 1>And then but the thing is, you think it's hard

0:43:25.680 --> 0:43:29.120
<v Speaker 1>to get one of the to get those justices to

0:43:29.600 --> 0:43:34.480
<v Speaker 1>change the substance of American jurisprudence. Imagine trying to get

0:43:34.520 --> 0:43:37.040
<v Speaker 1>him to change it back. This is like a Pandora's

0:43:37.120 --> 0:43:41.040
<v Speaker 1>box Pandora's jar situation. Yeah, now this is not not good.

0:43:41.360 --> 0:43:44.399
<v Speaker 1>You don't want this to happen for multiple reasons. Now,

0:43:44.840 --> 0:43:49.200
<v Speaker 1>all that being said, our our sympathies with the families

0:43:49.239 --> 0:43:51.840
<v Speaker 1>of those who are wounded and killed as a result

0:43:51.920 --> 0:43:56.080
<v Speaker 1>of this mass shooting. Absolutely I feel awful for them.

0:43:56.120 --> 0:43:59.080
<v Speaker 1>And if there were any other way to get to

0:43:59.120 --> 0:44:02.719
<v Speaker 1>that information that did not require Apple to be complicit

0:44:02.880 --> 0:44:07.240
<v Speaker 1>in destroying its own security, I would be in favor

0:44:07.280 --> 0:44:09.239
<v Speaker 1>of it. And in fact, the FBI has taken such

0:44:09.239 --> 0:44:13.200
<v Speaker 1>pains they got access to the iCloud backups that this

0:44:13.320 --> 0:44:15.799
<v Speaker 1>phone creates. The problem being that the phone didn't have

0:44:15.840 --> 0:44:17.960
<v Speaker 1>an eye cloud backup for the month leading up to

0:44:18.200 --> 0:44:21.680
<v Speaker 1>the actual attacks, so there could be information on the

0:44:21.719 --> 0:44:24.160
<v Speaker 1>phone that's not on the cloud, and that's why the

0:44:24.200 --> 0:44:27.200
<v Speaker 1>FBI wants to get access to that. I totally understand

0:44:27.239 --> 0:44:31.200
<v Speaker 1>the reasoning behind it. But but two things, of course

0:44:31.480 --> 0:44:34.880
<v Speaker 1>keep me from being completely sympathetic. One is that the

0:44:34.920 --> 0:44:38.480
<v Speaker 1>FBI has for years been trying to get backdoor access

0:44:38.520 --> 0:44:42.800
<v Speaker 1>to multiple systems. Yeah, so that so you could argue

0:44:42.840 --> 0:44:48.160
<v Speaker 1>that perhaps this mass shooting is being leveraged cynically by

0:44:48.200 --> 0:44:53.239
<v Speaker 1>the FBI in order to further their goals, because it's

0:44:53.280 --> 0:44:57.520
<v Speaker 1>hard to say no to such an emotionally devastating event.

0:44:59.280 --> 0:45:03.399
<v Speaker 1>I would say, I do, I do know, I believe it.

0:45:03.920 --> 0:45:09.080
<v Speaker 1>And this is just my personal opinion based on again precedent.

0:45:09.719 --> 0:45:14.160
<v Speaker 1>It is completely within the realm of not only possibility

0:45:14.480 --> 0:45:20.360
<v Speaker 1>but plausibility that an institution would wait for an opportune

0:45:20.440 --> 0:45:25.000
<v Speaker 1>time to make this this kind of legislation, like the

0:45:25.120 --> 0:45:29.319
<v Speaker 1>argument for internet surveillance based on saying, hey, we need

0:45:29.320 --> 0:45:32.799
<v Speaker 1>to protect people, we need to protect you from um

0:45:33.360 --> 0:45:38.560
<v Speaker 1>inappropriate content and your children, think of the kids. Really,

0:45:38.600 --> 0:45:41.000
<v Speaker 1>this is this is a lot of the same stuff

0:45:41.040 --> 0:45:44.880
<v Speaker 1>we heard in the wake of the Patriot Act, where

0:45:45.160 --> 0:45:48.000
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people felt the Patriot Act was a

0:45:48.040 --> 0:45:52.759
<v Speaker 1>reactionary uh, piece of legislation that was drafted far too

0:45:52.800 --> 0:45:56.280
<v Speaker 1>quickly and what had had reached far, far too wide

0:45:57.080 --> 0:46:01.240
<v Speaker 1>for what it was proposing. What what what? What everyone

0:46:01.280 --> 0:46:06.239
<v Speaker 1>claimed it was all about, and Uh, that was a

0:46:06.280 --> 0:46:10.120
<v Speaker 1>big mess. This is also potentially a really big mess.

0:46:10.200 --> 0:46:12.600
<v Speaker 1>And the Patriot Act, the substance of it was pretty

0:46:12.680 --> 0:46:16.080
<v Speaker 1>much had been written in advance. Yeah yeah, which is

0:46:16.120 --> 0:46:19.640
<v Speaker 1>pretty like now that used to be a controversial statement,

0:46:19.680 --> 0:46:23.080
<v Speaker 1>but now it's acknowledged. Yeah, So this is this is uh,

0:46:23.160 --> 0:46:25.359
<v Speaker 1>I mean the fact that FBI has had this plan

0:46:25.440 --> 0:46:30.080
<v Speaker 1>for a while, not the specific implementation, but this desire

0:46:30.120 --> 0:46:33.680
<v Speaker 1>to get this workaround access to things. And I mean,

0:46:33.719 --> 0:46:36.960
<v Speaker 1>I totally understand their point of view. Two, they're trying

0:46:36.960 --> 0:46:40.560
<v Speaker 1>to investigate things. It's not like the FBI is necessarily

0:46:40.640 --> 0:46:43.759
<v Speaker 1>made up of the cigarette smoking man and all of

0:46:43.760 --> 0:46:46.320
<v Speaker 1>his cronies. You know, I'm not I'm not going I don't.

0:46:46.400 --> 0:46:50.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't mean to to uh disparage them. I don't

0:46:50.160 --> 0:46:52.640
<v Speaker 1>want to demonize them, Right, That's not That's not what

0:46:52.680 --> 0:46:55.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm trying to get at. Either. The FBI's intentions may

0:46:56.000 --> 0:46:59.000
<v Speaker 1>in fact be nothing but noble that they want this

0:46:59.200 --> 0:47:05.040
<v Speaker 1>in the effort to investigate, solve crime, prevent crime from happening,

0:47:05.520 --> 0:47:09.600
<v Speaker 1>and not in any way that is uh malevolent. However,

0:47:10.760 --> 0:47:13.600
<v Speaker 1>the fact remains, whether their intentions are noble or not,

0:47:13.680 --> 0:47:17.520
<v Speaker 1>it opens up this opportunity for people whose intentions are

0:47:17.560 --> 0:47:23.160
<v Speaker 1>demonstrably not noble to take advantage of those same opportunities. Yeah,

0:47:23.239 --> 0:47:25.120
<v Speaker 1>and you know, I'm glad you said that because I

0:47:25.160 --> 0:47:27.319
<v Speaker 1>want to see something that I want to add to this,

0:47:27.719 --> 0:47:30.960
<v Speaker 1>something that has rarely said when we talk about um

0:47:31.200 --> 0:47:35.360
<v Speaker 1>government surveillance or concerns about privacy right. One thing that

0:47:35.480 --> 0:47:41.280
<v Speaker 1>is rarely said is that law enforcement agencies, law enforcement institutions,

0:47:41.320 --> 0:47:47.279
<v Speaker 1>and individuals in the US actually do quite, um, quite

0:47:47.280 --> 0:47:50.279
<v Speaker 1>an extraordinary job compared to a lot of places. If

0:47:50.320 --> 0:47:52.920
<v Speaker 1>you're fortunate enough to grow up in a place that

0:47:53.040 --> 0:47:56.200
<v Speaker 1>has rule of law, where you can walk down the

0:47:56.239 --> 0:47:59.440
<v Speaker 1>street in the dark, or you can say, you can say, uh,

0:47:59.480 --> 0:48:02.799
<v Speaker 1>you know, whomever your senator president is, you can go

0:48:02.880 --> 0:48:06.560
<v Speaker 1>on the internet and say, I think they stink. I

0:48:06.560 --> 0:48:10.000
<v Speaker 1>think you're in jerk. Yeah, I think you're the piece

0:48:10.040 --> 0:48:13.560
<v Speaker 1>of bologna with shoes. And then but in other countries,

0:48:13.640 --> 0:48:17.319
<v Speaker 1>we you know, people get arrested for that, people get imprisoned.

0:48:17.600 --> 0:48:22.839
<v Speaker 1>So we're not gonna raced, Yes, not just arrested or imprisoned,

0:48:22.840 --> 0:48:26.600
<v Speaker 1>but the government in some countries will take steps to

0:48:27.280 --> 0:48:29.960
<v Speaker 1>make it seem like that person was never a person exactly.

0:48:30.040 --> 0:48:32.080
<v Speaker 1>They'll keep the photos, but you won't be in them.

0:48:32.480 --> 0:48:34.920
<v Speaker 1>And and I say that because it's a sense of

0:48:35.000 --> 0:48:41.560
<v Speaker 1>much needed perspective. However, you know, I'm not demonizing the

0:48:41.600 --> 0:48:48.240
<v Speaker 1>people who work at the FBI. Institutions, whether private or public,

0:48:48.680 --> 0:48:55.520
<v Speaker 1>seek power. They seek uh further further, influence. And that's

0:48:55.520 --> 0:48:59.759
<v Speaker 1>not that's not because it's some sort of James Bond supervillain.

0:49:00.280 --> 0:49:04.200
<v Speaker 1>It's not specter. It's not specter. And it's because it

0:49:04.400 --> 0:49:10.640
<v Speaker 1>allows for it allows for an easier, more efficient pursuit

0:49:10.719 --> 0:49:14.000
<v Speaker 1>of whatever the original mission would be right, and sometimes

0:49:14.040 --> 0:49:17.200
<v Speaker 1>that ends up stepping over a line that should not

0:49:17.280 --> 0:49:21.440
<v Speaker 1>be crossed. So so yeah, like like Ben and I

0:49:21.520 --> 0:49:23.759
<v Speaker 1>we both talk about things that here at work where

0:49:23.760 --> 0:49:26.759
<v Speaker 1>we say, gosh, I wish we had X because it

0:49:26.760 --> 0:49:30.000
<v Speaker 1>would make our lives so much easier. Well, even if

0:49:30.040 --> 0:49:32.800
<v Speaker 1>we got X, we would come up with why. That

0:49:32.800 --> 0:49:35.680
<v Speaker 1>would be the next one we get X. X is awesome,

0:49:35.840 --> 0:49:37.520
<v Speaker 1>X is helping us out. We're like, oh man, it's

0:49:37.520 --> 0:49:40.480
<v Speaker 1>so good to have X here. Yeah, it would be

0:49:40.480 --> 0:49:42.399
<v Speaker 1>great if we had why because if we had why,

0:49:42.480 --> 0:49:45.080
<v Speaker 1>we could really do our jobs. Well we get why,

0:49:45.120 --> 0:49:48.240
<v Speaker 1>and then you know, man, X and Why are working

0:49:48.239 --> 0:49:50.600
<v Speaker 1>out like a dream. But boy, if we had Z,

0:49:51.000 --> 0:49:53.799
<v Speaker 1>can you imagine the level we get to Now what

0:49:53.880 --> 0:49:58.880
<v Speaker 1>we do Ben, we make fun audio podcasts, videos and

0:49:59.040 --> 0:50:02.680
<v Speaker 1>articles that go on the Internet, and that's awesome and

0:50:02.760 --> 0:50:08.719
<v Speaker 1>so really our capacity to do horrible, horrible harm is

0:50:08.920 --> 0:50:14.240
<v Speaker 1>fairly limited. I mean in respect to how our jobs comparatively. Yeah. Granted,

0:50:14.239 --> 0:50:16.200
<v Speaker 1>if either of us wanted to go outside and just

0:50:16.239 --> 0:50:19.160
<v Speaker 1>start throwing kingop hops popsicles at people, we could go

0:50:19.239 --> 0:50:22.319
<v Speaker 1>on a popsicle rampage. But that's that's not that's not

0:50:22.440 --> 0:50:28.360
<v Speaker 1>job related. The FBI, the c, I, A, N, S A,

0:50:28.360 --> 0:50:33.799
<v Speaker 1>a lot of those three letter organizations, in pursuit of

0:50:33.840 --> 0:50:36.280
<v Speaker 1>what they need to do in order to to fulfill

0:50:36.320 --> 0:50:41.759
<v Speaker 1>their their organization's mission, in some cases will step over

0:50:41.880 --> 0:50:45.560
<v Speaker 1>lines that we cannot allow people to cross because it

0:50:45.760 --> 0:50:49.839
<v Speaker 1>creates a system that is at least as dangerous as

0:50:49.880 --> 0:50:55.360
<v Speaker 1>whatever problem they're trying to solve. Another example of this

0:50:55.480 --> 0:51:03.440
<v Speaker 1>is the the idea that the idea of absolute prevention.

0:51:03.560 --> 0:51:07.280
<v Speaker 1>Like you know, there was the old conversation about tortures

0:51:07.320 --> 0:51:11.960
<v Speaker 1>several years ago when it was the ticking time bomb argument,

0:51:12.239 --> 0:51:16.319
<v Speaker 1>which was, should torture be legal if there is a

0:51:16.360 --> 0:51:21.560
<v Speaker 1>criminal in custody who has suspected of having knowledge of

0:51:22.160 --> 0:51:27.520
<v Speaker 1>another nine eleven here? Yeah, yeah, Jack Bauer from twenty

0:51:27.520 --> 0:51:32.960
<v Speaker 1>four kind of argument. Should torture, while reprehensible, be allowed

0:51:33.400 --> 0:51:38.400
<v Speaker 1>when it gets results? And this, this kind of reasoning

0:51:39.840 --> 0:51:43.879
<v Speaker 1>is dangerous. Not I'm not saying that because of any

0:51:43.960 --> 0:51:47.400
<v Speaker 1>desire to see human tragedy if I'm saying it's dangerous

0:51:47.480 --> 0:51:51.359
<v Speaker 1>because of the assumptions it makes that a special case

0:51:51.400 --> 0:51:54.920
<v Speaker 1>will remain a special case, right, and that perhaps the

0:51:54.960 --> 0:51:58.600
<v Speaker 1>next case, which maybe is that quite so special, Like, well,

0:51:59.680 --> 0:52:04.759
<v Speaker 1>you know we've done it before, So what's the deal here? Yeah,

0:52:04.800 --> 0:52:08.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean what happened? Yeah, So this is this is

0:52:08.800 --> 0:52:13.440
<v Speaker 1>exactly why neither I think I feel pretty strongly about this.

0:52:13.520 --> 0:52:15.040
<v Speaker 1>I think I'm on the right track that neither you

0:52:15.160 --> 0:52:19.200
<v Speaker 1>nor I feel that the FBI should win out in

0:52:19.239 --> 0:52:23.359
<v Speaker 1>this particular case. I think this is something where we

0:52:23.400 --> 0:52:25.719
<v Speaker 1>really need to see Apple come out on top. I

0:52:25.800 --> 0:52:29.160
<v Speaker 1>am not a huge fan of Apple. I don't own

0:52:29.200 --> 0:52:31.960
<v Speaker 1>a lot of Apple products I have. Apple does not

0:52:32.040 --> 0:52:35.760
<v Speaker 1>sponsor this show. I'm not getting any money from Apple.

0:52:36.800 --> 0:52:39.200
<v Speaker 1>If anything, I'm losing money to Apple because my wife

0:52:39.280 --> 0:52:41.680
<v Speaker 1>is a fan, so she wants to get an Apple Watch,

0:52:42.239 --> 0:52:46.240
<v Speaker 1>but I am not. I'm not getting anything from Apple. Uh.

0:52:46.320 --> 0:52:48.960
<v Speaker 1>I do think they're in the right because I don't

0:52:49.000 --> 0:52:53.280
<v Speaker 1>want to see a precedent where a company that creates

0:52:53.280 --> 0:52:58.080
<v Speaker 1>a secure system has to be or can be compelled

0:52:58.239 --> 0:53:03.320
<v Speaker 1>to compromise that security. It defeats the purpose of the security,

0:53:04.160 --> 0:53:08.239
<v Speaker 1>and whether it's this case, which is extraordinary and very emotional,

0:53:09.080 --> 0:53:14.040
<v Speaker 1>or something much less impactful for the general public. Maybe

0:53:14.080 --> 0:53:18.960
<v Speaker 1>it's something, you know, uh, simpler and less dramatic. It

0:53:19.000 --> 0:53:23.919
<v Speaker 1>doesn't matter. You cannot you cannot go down that pathway,

0:53:24.040 --> 0:53:26.640
<v Speaker 1>uh and expect things to turn out all right. You've

0:53:26.680 --> 0:53:29.240
<v Speaker 1>got to figure out other ways to do that kind

0:53:29.320 --> 0:53:35.000
<v Speaker 1>of investigation. Either Apple needs to go in a direction

0:53:35.080 --> 0:53:41.320
<v Speaker 1>where they can, uh, they can access user data without

0:53:41.360 --> 0:53:44.919
<v Speaker 1>having to circumvent a security system like this, which means

0:53:44.920 --> 0:53:46.759
<v Speaker 1>they have to go backwards, which can really is not

0:53:46.800 --> 0:53:52.040
<v Speaker 1>a possibility. Or Apple and other companies have to create

0:53:52.680 --> 0:53:57.680
<v Speaker 1>systems where it really is impossible for them to access

0:53:57.719 --> 0:54:02.560
<v Speaker 1>without the consent or the actions of the owner of

0:54:02.600 --> 0:54:06.640
<v Speaker 1>the device. I suspect that every company is rushing to

0:54:06.719 --> 0:54:09.600
<v Speaker 1>develop that kind of approach right now, because none of

0:54:09.600 --> 0:54:14.240
<v Speaker 1>them want to be in this position. Facebook, Google, Microsoft

0:54:14.440 --> 0:54:18.560
<v Speaker 1>all publicly showed support for Apple. Apple right now is

0:54:18.800 --> 0:54:23.799
<v Speaker 1>um you know, part of Apple hired a dev that

0:54:23.880 --> 0:54:28.480
<v Speaker 1>worked on Edward Snowden's favorite messaging app obasually Yeah, and uh,

0:54:28.560 --> 0:54:31.520
<v Speaker 1>and I don't know how much of that is meant

0:54:31.520 --> 0:54:34.480
<v Speaker 1>to be like a pr move, but also they have

0:54:34.760 --> 0:54:39.640
<v Speaker 1>um you know, the leaked Snowden papers are out there,

0:54:39.640 --> 0:54:42.080
<v Speaker 1>and I know I'm harping on them. They revealed an

0:54:42.160 --> 0:54:47.000
<v Speaker 1>ugly behind the scenes look at corporate involvement with government

0:54:47.000 --> 0:54:54.080
<v Speaker 1>requests for surveillance. You know, so the average consumer you me, uh,

0:54:54.280 --> 0:55:01.200
<v Speaker 1>Gary Busey, whomever, we have much less trust in general

0:55:01.320 --> 0:55:05.600
<v Speaker 1>in these companies because we have a reason not to

0:55:05.680 --> 0:55:11.080
<v Speaker 1>trust them. Well, we we have handed over so much

0:55:11.239 --> 0:55:16.040
<v Speaker 1>of our own personal data. We trust that the devices

0:55:16.120 --> 0:55:20.399
<v Speaker 1>that hold that personal data aren't going to just give

0:55:20.480 --> 0:55:26.279
<v Speaker 1>that away to whatever entity, uh, without our consent. We

0:55:26.280 --> 0:55:29.800
<v Speaker 1>we trust that that's not going to happen. When things

0:55:29.800 --> 0:55:32.560
<v Speaker 1>like this pop up where we start to question that trust,

0:55:33.360 --> 0:55:37.280
<v Speaker 1>that's problematic. There's someone else that Apple has recently hired,

0:55:38.440 --> 0:55:41.440
<v Speaker 1>Ted Olsen. Does that name sound familiar to you? Ted?

0:55:42.280 --> 0:55:45.759
<v Speaker 1>Ted Olson's a lawyer. Uh so, Ted Olson is going

0:55:45.800 --> 0:55:48.840
<v Speaker 1>to be representing Apple. Ted Olson's probably best known for

0:55:50.000 --> 0:55:56.320
<v Speaker 1>representing George W. Bush in the Bush versus Gore election fallout.

0:55:56.520 --> 0:55:59.160
<v Speaker 1>You know, for those of you in the United States

0:55:59.480 --> 0:56:02.640
<v Speaker 1>when when Bush was running against Gore, there was this

0:56:02.719 --> 0:56:08.080
<v Speaker 1>whole battle about you know, voting recounts, voting recounts, and

0:56:08.120 --> 0:56:12.440
<v Speaker 1>Olsen represented uh, W. George W. Bush on that and

0:56:12.560 --> 0:56:15.720
<v Speaker 1>Bush ended up winning that. So now he's representing Apple

0:56:15.760 --> 0:56:20.960
<v Speaker 1>in this particular battle with the FBI. So interesting to

0:56:21.040 --> 0:56:26.120
<v Speaker 1>see these kinds of personalities involved in this. And I

0:56:26.200 --> 0:56:31.200
<v Speaker 1>know that with the public perception it's been a little

0:56:31.360 --> 0:56:34.279
<v Speaker 1>sea saw ish, But general public, I would argue, the

0:56:34.280 --> 0:56:37.280
<v Speaker 1>people who are not necessarily paying attention to the text sphere,

0:56:38.160 --> 0:56:39.719
<v Speaker 1>I think a lot of them are siting with the

0:56:39.760 --> 0:56:44.480
<v Speaker 1>FBI because it's a terrorist story. It's a story about

0:56:45.000 --> 0:56:49.600
<v Speaker 1>trying to establish the most information about these these shooters

0:56:49.640 --> 0:56:53.000
<v Speaker 1>as possible. Do you think I do? I think that.

0:56:53.040 --> 0:56:55.759
<v Speaker 1>I think at least a lot of polls that I've

0:56:55.760 --> 0:56:59.200
<v Speaker 1>seen leading up to today, the general public tends to

0:56:59.239 --> 0:57:01.719
<v Speaker 1>side with the I because the FBI has a very

0:57:01.719 --> 0:57:09.120
<v Speaker 1>emotional story. Apples story is much more rationally based, intellectually based, um,

0:57:09.200 --> 0:57:14.760
<v Speaker 1>and the FBI story is is penned on this event,

0:57:14.880 --> 0:57:19.480
<v Speaker 1>this very emotionally charged event. UM. I don't know that

0:57:19.480 --> 0:57:21.240
<v Speaker 1>that's going to continue. I think. I think people who

0:57:21.240 --> 0:57:24.600
<v Speaker 1>are savvy in the text sphere, I think the majority

0:57:24.640 --> 0:57:27.120
<v Speaker 1>of them side with Apple. But it's still because it's

0:57:27.160 --> 0:57:30.080
<v Speaker 1>still it goes back to the taking time bomb argument.

0:57:30.200 --> 0:57:34.760
<v Speaker 1>You know, yeah. Yeah, So this is one of the

0:57:34.800 --> 0:57:37.240
<v Speaker 1>stories that we definitely had to cover. I mean, obviously

0:57:37.280 --> 0:57:39.600
<v Speaker 1>it's it's such a huge it's probably the biggest story

0:57:39.600 --> 0:57:42.680
<v Speaker 1>in tech right now as we record this, um, and

0:57:42.760 --> 0:57:45.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm glad that you could join Mayben to to chat

0:57:45.920 --> 0:57:48.520
<v Speaker 1>about this, to kind of give your your insight as well,

0:57:49.040 --> 0:57:52.800
<v Speaker 1>and to talk about why this is so important, not

0:57:52.920 --> 0:57:56.760
<v Speaker 1>just from a technology standpoint, but just a philosophical standpoint

0:57:57.280 --> 0:58:01.439
<v Speaker 1>in a matter of law as well. So then where

0:58:01.480 --> 0:58:06.760
<v Speaker 1>can people find other stuff what you do? Ah? Yes, uh, well,

0:58:06.880 --> 0:58:12.320
<v Speaker 1>if for any audience members who are interested in stories

0:58:12.400 --> 0:58:17.040
<v Speaker 1>about Big Brother and overarching government surveillance, you can join

0:58:17.200 --> 0:58:21.640
<v Speaker 1>me along with my producers Noel Brown and Matt Frederick

0:58:21.760 --> 0:58:25.000
<v Speaker 1>at our show Stuff they don't want you to know,

0:58:25.280 --> 0:58:29.480
<v Speaker 1>on which you have made several appearances, Jonathan. I enjoyed

0:58:29.480 --> 0:58:32.320
<v Speaker 1>all of them. Oh, thank you. I like it when

0:58:32.400 --> 0:58:36.320
<v Speaker 1>we go on the pun tangents, which sadly doesn't happen

0:58:37.040 --> 0:58:40.720
<v Speaker 1>too much off air. But oh and side note, folks, Yeah,

0:58:40.760 --> 0:58:43.520
<v Speaker 1>I know we didn't make very many jokes today, but

0:58:44.200 --> 0:58:47.360
<v Speaker 1>that's because I think I can I can say you know,

0:58:47.440 --> 0:58:49.080
<v Speaker 1>you and I are on the same page with this.

0:58:49.080 --> 0:58:52.360
<v Speaker 1>This is a very important issue, more more important than

0:58:52.520 --> 0:58:55.360
<v Speaker 1>it may appear at the time. Yeah, we we made

0:58:55.440 --> 0:58:59.560
<v Speaker 1>light of a few of the arguments simply because we

0:58:59.680 --> 0:59:05.200
<v Speaker 1>scot off at the uh the stated intent as opposed

0:59:05.200 --> 0:59:08.040
<v Speaker 1>to what we believe is the true intent of them. Yeah,

0:59:08.320 --> 0:59:10.600
<v Speaker 1>we've done that a couple of times. But and also,

0:59:10.880 --> 0:59:15.479
<v Speaker 1>you know, we do acknowledge that this ultimately is being

0:59:15.520 --> 0:59:18.400
<v Speaker 1>tied back to a really awful event. I mean, we

0:59:18.440 --> 0:59:22.400
<v Speaker 1>can't you know, we can't get around that, and you

0:59:22.520 --> 0:59:25.360
<v Speaker 1>have to acknowledge it and be respectful, I think, right.

0:59:25.560 --> 0:59:29.720
<v Speaker 1>And plus uh, Plus we think we're funny, so that too,

0:59:29.720 --> 0:59:33.040
<v Speaker 1>and we want you to remember that we think we're funny, right,

0:59:33.080 --> 0:59:35.680
<v Speaker 1>that's our opinion. We don't we don't expect you to

0:59:35.720 --> 0:59:38.400
<v Speaker 1>find us funny. That would be presumptuous, but we are.

0:59:39.280 --> 0:59:41.800
<v Speaker 1>We think we're pretty hilarious. You can also find me

0:59:41.920 --> 0:59:45.240
<v Speaker 1>with my co host Scott Benjamin, who has appeared on

0:59:45.280 --> 0:59:47.640
<v Speaker 1>Tech Stuff as well. On our show Car Stuff is

0:59:47.680 --> 0:59:51.920
<v Speaker 1>show about everything that floats, flies, swims, or drives Jonathan.

0:59:52.040 --> 0:59:56.280
<v Speaker 1>Folks can see us uh together even at times on

0:59:56.440 --> 0:59:59.600
<v Speaker 1>our shows What the Stuff and Brain Stuff, which answers

0:59:59.600 --> 1:00:02.000
<v Speaker 1>every day science. Why does popcorn pop what is it

1:00:02.080 --> 1:00:06.720
<v Speaker 1>GPS and uh I know that this is something I

1:00:07.080 --> 1:00:09.320
<v Speaker 1>recommend every time if there's someone who hasn't checked it

1:00:09.320 --> 1:00:12.400
<v Speaker 1>out yet. You have another show called Forward Thinking, which

1:00:12.480 --> 1:00:15.000
<v Speaker 1>is a bright, cheery show about the future, and it

1:00:15.040 --> 1:00:17.880
<v Speaker 1>really is. It's a very it's it's an optimistic view

1:00:18.440 --> 1:00:22.200
<v Speaker 1>of what our future can be based upon the very

1:00:22.280 --> 1:00:26.160
<v Speaker 1>long history of humankind coming up with ingenious solutions to

1:00:26.200 --> 1:00:29.040
<v Speaker 1>big problems. Well, yeah, and you have, um, you have

1:00:29.160 --> 1:00:32.160
<v Speaker 1>some great questions on there. The research is top notch.

1:00:32.280 --> 1:00:34.800
<v Speaker 1>This is a video and an audio series, so I

1:00:34.880 --> 1:00:37.240
<v Speaker 1>highly recommend it. Well, thank you so much, Ben, and

1:00:37.280 --> 1:00:38.880
<v Speaker 1>I really do hope that you and I get the

1:00:38.880 --> 1:00:41.240
<v Speaker 1>opportunity to do some more of those videos together. It's

1:00:41.240 --> 1:00:43.840
<v Speaker 1>been a long time since we've done a two person episode.

1:00:44.080 --> 1:00:46.000
<v Speaker 1>I wish you know what I wish I could tell

1:00:46.200 --> 1:00:50.160
<v Speaker 1>everyone is to go to Brooklyn and catch the two

1:00:50.160 --> 1:00:55.880
<v Speaker 1>of us competing and what was it Thendunderdome. Yeah, there's

1:00:55.880 --> 1:00:59.560
<v Speaker 1>gonna be no no puns barred and we go there. Alright. So,

1:00:59.640 --> 1:01:02.280
<v Speaker 1>guy is, if you have any suggestions for future episodes

1:01:02.320 --> 1:01:04.760
<v Speaker 1>of Text Stuff, let me know. Send me an email.

1:01:05.120 --> 1:01:07.680
<v Speaker 1>The addresses tech Stuff at how stuff Works dot com,

1:01:07.800 --> 1:01:10.000
<v Speaker 1>or you can drop me a line on Facebook or Twitter.

1:01:10.400 --> 1:01:12.919
<v Speaker 1>The handle of both of those is text stuff H

1:01:13.120 --> 1:01:15.400
<v Speaker 1>s W and I will talk to you guys again

1:01:16.200 --> 1:01:25.360
<v Speaker 1>really soon. For more on this and thousands of other topics,

1:01:25.600 --> 1:01:37.120
<v Speaker 1>is it how stuff works dot com