WEBVTT - The British Investing Risk Factor

0:00:00.160 --> 0:00:03.160
<v Speaker 1>Well, we've been putting a lot of money into the UK,

0:00:03.600 --> 0:00:06.920
<v Speaker 1>so they have a lot of pockets of strength that

0:00:07.000 --> 0:00:11.239
<v Speaker 1>they've been through a complex time politically, but if you

0:00:11.320 --> 0:00:15.280
<v Speaker 1>look longer term, I think there are some interesting things

0:00:15.320 --> 0:00:16.200
<v Speaker 1>going on here.

0:00:16.760 --> 0:00:18.520
<v Speaker 2>There was a boss of Blackstone, one of the world's

0:00:18.520 --> 0:00:24.120
<v Speaker 2>biggest private equity investors, headlining the government's flagship investment conference

0:00:24.200 --> 0:00:27.600
<v Speaker 2>just a couple of weeks ago, trying to attract investment

0:00:28.160 --> 0:00:29.440
<v Speaker 2>and get more money in the country.

0:00:29.720 --> 0:00:31.479
<v Speaker 3>Hampton Court. No, last you were that, weren't you.

0:00:31.560 --> 0:00:33.200
<v Speaker 2>He was very christmasy and cold.

0:00:33.560 --> 0:00:34.280
<v Speaker 3>Everyone showed up.

0:00:34.320 --> 0:00:36.760
<v Speaker 2>You had sovereign wealth funds, you had the guitarian investment

0:00:36.800 --> 0:00:39.400
<v Speaker 2>authority of a well run show, and they actually got

0:00:39.440 --> 0:00:40.280
<v Speaker 2>real money behind it.

0:00:40.720 --> 0:00:43.239
<v Speaker 3>I remember having to do something for it at the

0:00:43.280 --> 0:00:46.800
<v Speaker 3>one two years previously at the Science Museum, the first one,

0:00:47.040 --> 0:00:50.560
<v Speaker 3>the inaugural. Yeah, it was quite awkward because I was

0:00:50.600 --> 0:00:54.160
<v Speaker 3>asked to share something between the then Prime Minister Portions

0:00:54.200 --> 0:00:58.560
<v Speaker 3>and Bill Gates and Boris announced the amount that Bill

0:00:58.640 --> 0:01:00.800
<v Speaker 3>gwent Gates was investing in the country and he got

0:01:00.800 --> 0:01:05.360
<v Speaker 3>it wrong. And I remember not knowing how to adjudicate

0:01:05.480 --> 0:01:09.600
<v Speaker 3>between Boris getting Bill Gates's quantum wrong Bill Gates was

0:01:09.640 --> 0:01:12.720
<v Speaker 3>furious that he had been kind of under sold and

0:01:12.760 --> 0:01:15.000
<v Speaker 3>this was the beginning of the investment summits. So but

0:01:15.440 --> 0:01:17.280
<v Speaker 3>that was you know, that was very slick and very

0:01:17.319 --> 0:01:19.640
<v Speaker 3>good as well. Though there has been some commentary recently

0:01:19.680 --> 0:01:22.240
<v Speaker 3>about it takes so long to get some of these

0:01:22.280 --> 0:01:25.240
<v Speaker 3>amounts that agreed at the time, but still it takes

0:01:25.400 --> 0:01:28.399
<v Speaker 3>a while to get them actually into the country.

0:01:29.120 --> 0:01:31.840
<v Speaker 2>And I guess the UK still has structural problems right.

0:01:31.880 --> 0:01:34.000
<v Speaker 2>It's not doing as well as it could in terms

0:01:34.040 --> 0:01:37.480
<v Speaker 2>of productivity, in terms of worthy economies headed so you

0:01:37.520 --> 0:01:39.479
<v Speaker 2>always have to make the case of why you'd invest

0:01:39.480 --> 0:01:41.000
<v Speaker 2>in the UK instead of elsewhere.

0:01:41.400 --> 0:01:43.760
<v Speaker 3>Yes, and the gentleman we're going to hear from in

0:01:43.800 --> 0:01:46.760
<v Speaker 3>a second, Lord Harrington. What's interesting about his review is

0:01:46.800 --> 0:01:49.800
<v Speaker 3>the amount of cross party support it does seem to have,

0:01:50.760 --> 0:01:53.680
<v Speaker 3>and lots of the commentary from Bloomberg and others has

0:01:53.720 --> 0:01:56.520
<v Speaker 3>been around. You know, this is a decent package, but

0:01:56.600 --> 0:01:57.680
<v Speaker 3>why has it taken so long?

0:02:00.120 --> 0:02:02.480
<v Speaker 2>Come to In the City Bloomberg's podcast, connecting you to

0:02:02.520 --> 0:02:05.240
<v Speaker 2>the conversations and the stories shaping the world of finance

0:02:05.480 --> 0:02:08.800
<v Speaker 2>and fronting like One our London studio with Alecrastratton and

0:02:08.840 --> 0:02:11.480
<v Speaker 2>this week we speak with Tory peer Lord Harrington, who

0:02:11.520 --> 0:02:14.840
<v Speaker 2>recently headed the government review into the UK's approach to

0:02:14.880 --> 0:02:16.720
<v Speaker 2>attracting foreign direct investment.

0:02:18.560 --> 0:02:23.360
<v Speaker 3>Not Harrington, you've been around Westminster and UK politics for

0:02:23.440 --> 0:02:28.480
<v Speaker 3>quite a while. You've proposed these investment changes. Why, reflecting

0:02:28.639 --> 0:02:30.880
<v Speaker 3>on the last few years, or indeed thirteen years, has

0:02:30.880 --> 0:02:33.240
<v Speaker 3>it taken so long do you think for the government

0:02:33.320 --> 0:02:35.200
<v Speaker 3>to give you the mandate it did well.

0:02:35.240 --> 0:02:39.720
<v Speaker 4>I think government moves slowly. And the reality is capitalism

0:02:39.760 --> 0:02:42.440
<v Speaker 4>has changed as far as investments concerned. From what I

0:02:42.480 --> 0:02:47.040
<v Speaker 4>can see, it's moved from a belief in this country

0:02:47.120 --> 0:02:51.639
<v Speaker 4>amongst certain sections of the Conservative Party that actually businesses

0:02:51.720 --> 0:02:53.799
<v Speaker 4>not much to do with government. You move out the way,

0:02:53.919 --> 0:02:57.360
<v Speaker 4>you reduce the taxes, and you provide an environment that

0:02:57.400 --> 0:03:00.000
<v Speaker 4>the market will take care of itself. Well, the world

0:03:00.120 --> 0:03:05.359
<v Speaker 4>has changed now. Every other capitalistic country Western democracy, will

0:03:05.400 --> 0:03:11.400
<v Speaker 4>include the Eastern Western democracies are actively going out to

0:03:11.880 --> 0:03:16.639
<v Speaker 4>bribe in the companies to come there. Actually bribe sounds dishonest,

0:03:16.639 --> 0:03:19.680
<v Speaker 4>but you know, incent them to do it with a

0:03:19.760 --> 0:03:25.080
<v Speaker 4>package of money, energy, a site you know will rent

0:03:25.080 --> 0:03:28.840
<v Speaker 4>free site or packages are skills, visas and everything else.

0:03:29.160 --> 0:03:31.200
<v Speaker 4>And we've been very slow to react to that.

0:03:32.000 --> 0:03:35.040
<v Speaker 2>Hasn't it always been like that? I remember Emmanuel Macron

0:03:35.560 --> 0:03:38.000
<v Speaker 2>rolling the red carpets for the banks in Paris.

0:03:38.720 --> 0:03:42.760
<v Speaker 4>Well, Macron is the exemplar of the active head of state.

0:03:43.120 --> 0:03:45.600
<v Speaker 4>In fact, if I had fifty pounds for every person

0:03:45.640 --> 0:03:48.120
<v Speaker 4>who told me that they've got Macron's mobile number and

0:03:48.200 --> 0:03:51.240
<v Speaker 4>speak to him regularly about investment, I'd be a rich man.

0:03:51.600 --> 0:03:54.080
<v Speaker 4>But I do exaggerate to make a point. You know,

0:03:54.440 --> 0:03:58.200
<v Speaker 4>they've definitely been much more investment friendly, and I do

0:03:58.240 --> 0:04:01.520
<v Speaker 4>think Rishi and is credit for this. I think he's

0:04:01.560 --> 0:04:04.280
<v Speaker 4>done his best to try and counter that. For example,

0:04:04.480 --> 0:04:06.960
<v Speaker 4>we had a very good global investment summit a couple

0:04:07.000 --> 0:04:10.240
<v Speaker 4>of weeks ago at Hampton Court. It was impressive. But

0:04:11.080 --> 0:04:15.400
<v Speaker 4>the reality is of companies that want to invest in

0:04:15.400 --> 0:04:18.479
<v Speaker 4>the UK. And I say companies I include sovering, well funds,

0:04:18.560 --> 0:04:22.760
<v Speaker 4>pension funds, financial institutions as well as multinational companies. They

0:04:22.839 --> 0:04:27.400
<v Speaker 4>find us very disjointed in our approach. It takes too long.

0:04:27.600 --> 0:04:30.600
<v Speaker 4>They get written offers from other countries in thirty days.

0:04:30.920 --> 0:04:34.520
<v Speaker 4>I mean one company told me who wanted eighty million

0:04:34.920 --> 0:04:38.440
<v Speaker 4>on a one point four billion investment. So actually on

0:04:38.480 --> 0:04:41.680
<v Speaker 4>the scale of it not a lot that fourteen months

0:04:41.720 --> 0:04:44.080
<v Speaker 4>later they hadn't heard whether you've got it or not.

0:04:44.960 --> 0:04:47.320
<v Speaker 4>And this is the whole purpose for my report on

0:04:47.360 --> 0:04:50.160
<v Speaker 4>foreign directing investment is to come up with a system

0:04:50.200 --> 0:04:53.640
<v Speaker 4>of organization of government to make sure that doesn't happen.

0:04:53.920 --> 0:04:56.120
<v Speaker 4>It's not just saying we'll throw a lot of money around,

0:04:56.120 --> 0:04:57.599
<v Speaker 4>because we don't have a lot of money.

0:04:57.680 --> 0:05:00.080
<v Speaker 3>So how confident are you that these changes will be

0:05:00.080 --> 0:05:01.359
<v Speaker 3>becoming to affect asap?

0:05:01.560 --> 0:05:05.160
<v Speaker 4>Well? All I can say is that Jeremy Hunt, the Chancellor,

0:05:06.160 --> 0:05:09.640
<v Speaker 4>has assured me that they will. One of my main

0:05:10.560 --> 0:05:14.240
<v Speaker 4>recommendations was an investment committee at cabinet level that that

0:05:14.279 --> 0:05:18.600
<v Speaker 4>will convene in January. But it's all about reorganizing government

0:05:18.640 --> 0:05:22.400
<v Speaker 4>in an investment friendly way. So the nearest comparison I

0:05:22.400 --> 0:05:26.120
<v Speaker 4>could say to answer your question is that the first

0:05:26.200 --> 0:05:30.080
<v Speaker 4>component is having a senior level investment committee kind of

0:05:30.120 --> 0:05:33.719
<v Speaker 4>cabinet level, who is like the board of a bank,

0:05:33.839 --> 0:05:37.640
<v Speaker 4>laying out an investment strategy. If that sits, which it

0:05:37.680 --> 0:05:40.560
<v Speaker 4>is in January, I hope everything will flow from that

0:05:40.920 --> 0:05:44.640
<v Speaker 4>because there's not that much politics in it, the opposition

0:05:44.720 --> 0:05:47.760
<v Speaker 4>of being I've spoken to Jonathan Reynolds, who's the Shadow

0:05:47.800 --> 0:05:52.360
<v Speaker 4>Business Secretary about it and Rachel Reeves, and they've said publicly.

0:05:52.560 --> 0:05:54.920
<v Speaker 4>I think Jonathan Reynold spoke publicly a couple of weeks

0:05:54.920 --> 0:05:57.680
<v Speaker 4>ago at PwC saying that they support it. So our

0:05:57.760 --> 0:06:00.240
<v Speaker 4>hope this is not politically contentious.

0:06:00.800 --> 0:06:02.920
<v Speaker 2>What happened to the UK? I've been living here more

0:06:02.960 --> 0:06:06.600
<v Speaker 2>than twenty five years fifteen twenty years ago, all of

0:06:06.640 --> 0:06:09.560
<v Speaker 2>European capital wanted to come to the UK. It's capital

0:06:09.600 --> 0:06:11.560
<v Speaker 2>that wanted to be put to work because it had

0:06:11.560 --> 0:06:13.400
<v Speaker 2>the rule of law, which it still has. I mean,

0:06:13.440 --> 0:06:16.479
<v Speaker 2>it was just it made sense to put money here.

0:06:17.279 --> 0:06:20.400
<v Speaker 4>We definitely start for the point you've made English language

0:06:20.560 --> 0:06:23.400
<v Speaker 4>rule of law. People like to live here, kids go

0:06:23.480 --> 0:06:27.400
<v Speaker 4>to school and those cliche stuff. Yes we are fifteen

0:06:27.440 --> 0:06:31.800
<v Speaker 4>love up. But after that I'm afraid things really But why?

0:06:32.600 --> 0:06:37.000
<v Speaker 4>Because the government's very old fashioned. It's not organized in

0:06:37.040 --> 0:06:41.599
<v Speaker 4>a way. You know, each department has different policy objectives.

0:06:41.720 --> 0:06:44.360
<v Speaker 3>The kind of elephant in the room or the department

0:06:44.400 --> 0:06:47.240
<v Speaker 3>elephant in the room would be the Treasury, where I

0:06:47.400 --> 0:06:51.400
<v Speaker 3>worked for a period. In my reflections are that they

0:06:51.440 --> 0:06:55.720
<v Speaker 3>weren't hugely comfortable using UK public money when they thought

0:06:55.880 --> 0:06:58.559
<v Speaker 3>that the private sector would do it. So I wonder

0:06:58.600 --> 0:07:01.160
<v Speaker 3>whether you think that cultural change is possible.

0:07:01.400 --> 0:07:04.240
<v Speaker 4>I think so. I mean treasury orthodoxy, of which Rishi

0:07:04.360 --> 0:07:07.559
<v Speaker 4>is a proponent of, is basically it's a begging bowl.

0:07:07.839 --> 0:07:09.880
<v Speaker 4>If you allow all this stuff, it's just a begging

0:07:09.880 --> 0:07:12.800
<v Speaker 4>well for companies that would invest anyway. Yep, you know

0:07:12.880 --> 0:07:17.200
<v Speaker 4>that's mantra number one. And it's not stupid. It's been

0:07:17.240 --> 0:07:22.200
<v Speaker 4>born about from experience. But the reality is in a business,

0:07:22.200 --> 0:07:24.160
<v Speaker 4>you have to do what your competitors do. You know,

0:07:24.200 --> 0:07:27.080
<v Speaker 4>we are not big enough to be market makers, were

0:07:27.160 --> 0:07:29.840
<v Speaker 4>market takers. It's not an insult. It's just we've got

0:07:29.880 --> 0:07:33.119
<v Speaker 4>sixty million people and you know have got hundreds of million.

0:07:33.400 --> 0:07:37.440
<v Speaker 4>So you do what your competitors do. And the competitors

0:07:37.440 --> 0:07:41.760
<v Speaker 4>are incenting companies and foreign institutions to invest in them

0:07:41.760 --> 0:07:45.440
<v Speaker 4>by offering them a package, some of which is money. Now,

0:07:45.440 --> 0:07:49.040
<v Speaker 4>we're actually quite good at money, we really are. For example,

0:07:49.040 --> 0:07:51.560
<v Speaker 4>when I was at Bays in twenty sixteen, we were

0:07:51.600 --> 0:07:54.520
<v Speaker 4>spending about nine billion on research and development. We're now

0:07:54.520 --> 0:07:56.920
<v Speaker 4>spending twenty nine billion. I mean, it's not that the

0:07:56.920 --> 0:07:59.040
<v Speaker 4>money's not there, but it's all over the place. It's

0:07:59.040 --> 0:08:04.000
<v Speaker 4>in pots. It's challenges it's in competitions, it's in grants,

0:08:04.040 --> 0:08:07.480
<v Speaker 4>and you know, it's very confusing for a company, very confusing.

0:08:07.800 --> 0:08:11.040
<v Speaker 2>But again it does the book stop with the Prime minister.

0:08:11.200 --> 0:08:14.280
<v Speaker 2>So is it the political instability in the last five

0:08:14.360 --> 0:08:17.160
<v Speaker 2>six years that means that business and investment were not

0:08:17.240 --> 0:08:19.920
<v Speaker 2>top of mind when making government policy.

0:08:20.240 --> 0:08:23.520
<v Speaker 4>I think that's a fair point, I think, and I

0:08:23.520 --> 0:08:27.239
<v Speaker 4>can quote some examples where take for example net.

0:08:27.120 --> 0:08:30.080
<v Speaker 3>Zero and just thinking about that mobile a.

0:08:30.160 --> 0:08:33.640
<v Speaker 4>Very noble policy objective. We did a lot of work

0:08:33.640 --> 0:08:36.439
<v Speaker 4>when we did the Industrial Strategy, which I helped write

0:08:37.920 --> 0:08:39.400
<v Speaker 4>a lot of people out right, I'm not saying I

0:08:39.400 --> 0:08:41.120
<v Speaker 4>wrote it. It's like a huge tone, but I was

0:08:41.200 --> 0:08:44.920
<v Speaker 4>part of it for various sectors. Take automotive, and we

0:08:45.000 --> 0:08:49.480
<v Speaker 4>met with all of the automotive companies, scientists, economists, modelers,

0:08:49.520 --> 0:08:52.679
<v Speaker 4>everyone you can imagine, and came up with a consensus

0:08:53.000 --> 0:08:56.559
<v Speaker 4>that twenty to fifty was the year for the end

0:08:56.600 --> 0:08:59.840
<v Speaker 4>of you know, buying internal combustion engine cars, et cetera.

0:09:00.720 --> 0:09:03.240
<v Speaker 4>Because the companies said they needed twenty odd years, et cetera.

0:09:04.600 --> 0:09:09.120
<v Speaker 4>Lots of companies began to make programs around that for investment.

0:09:09.960 --> 0:09:13.520
<v Speaker 4>Four years later, in twenty twenty, Boris and Grant Shafts

0:09:13.600 --> 0:09:17.160
<v Speaker 4>at some conference announced that we were changing it to

0:09:17.200 --> 0:09:21.000
<v Speaker 4>twenty thirty Again. It may be a noble policy objective,

0:09:21.000 --> 0:09:25.440
<v Speaker 4>but from an investment point of view.

0:09:23.800 --> 0:09:26.200
<v Speaker 3>Forward to twenty years in a sentence a.

0:09:26.200 --> 0:09:29.640
<v Speaker 4>Few weeks ago, Rishi in a speech changed its twenty

0:09:29.760 --> 0:09:33.079
<v Speaker 4>thirty five. Now again, I'm not saying that there's arguments

0:09:33.080 --> 0:09:36.480
<v Speaker 4>for those policies, but from an investor's point of view,

0:09:36.559 --> 0:09:40.000
<v Speaker 4>there's a complete lack of consistency. So I think that's

0:09:40.000 --> 0:09:42.080
<v Speaker 4>a sort of waffly way of saying I agree with you,

0:09:42.160 --> 0:09:45.840
<v Speaker 4>because I don't think it's been The investment consequences of

0:09:45.880 --> 0:09:49.200
<v Speaker 4>policy decisions have been at the top of the agenda,

0:09:49.280 --> 0:09:50.200
<v Speaker 4>and I think they should be.

0:09:51.240 --> 0:09:53.560
<v Speaker 2>Does the UK have to work harder because of breaksit?

0:09:55.080 --> 0:09:57.160
<v Speaker 4>Well, when I was asked to do the job by

0:09:57.280 --> 0:10:00.240
<v Speaker 4>Jeremy Hunt, I mean my first thought was, oh, it's

0:10:00.280 --> 0:10:03.000
<v Speaker 4>because of Brexit, because it's gone down since twenty sixteen,

0:10:03.800 --> 0:10:09.400
<v Speaker 4>significantly address product investment. And then other people on perhaps

0:10:09.480 --> 0:10:12.679
<v Speaker 4>other side of the political spectrum said, oh, no, it's

0:10:12.679 --> 0:10:16.040
<v Speaker 4>all corporation tax. If you knock down corporation tax, they'll come.

0:10:16.520 --> 0:10:20.040
<v Speaker 4>But in fact I found the evidence we took from

0:10:20.080 --> 0:10:24.440
<v Speaker 4>more than two hundred companies and foreign institute severing, well funds,

0:10:24.559 --> 0:10:28.400
<v Speaker 4>pension fans, et cetera. Was Yes, in some cases it

0:10:28.520 --> 0:10:31.800
<v Speaker 4>was Brexit if it was pure market access, you know,

0:10:31.840 --> 0:10:36.560
<v Speaker 4>perhaps a heavy manufactured product that required frictionless movement of

0:10:37.000 --> 0:10:40.760
<v Speaker 4>components and finished product. Yes, Brexit was a point, but

0:10:40.880 --> 0:10:44.480
<v Speaker 4>actually I found it less significant than I thought. That's

0:10:44.520 --> 0:10:47.960
<v Speaker 4>not it's easy for me, So it's Brexit, but I'm

0:10:47.960 --> 0:10:50.480
<v Speaker 4>not saying it wasn't a fact that. Similarly with corporation tax,

0:10:50.559 --> 0:10:54.840
<v Speaker 4>take Big Farmer for example, you know AstraZeneca who took

0:10:54.880 --> 0:10:57.080
<v Speaker 4>a decision to go to Ireland and not US. It

0:10:57.120 --> 0:10:59.840
<v Speaker 4>wasn't really the difference in corporation tax because they don't

0:11:00.360 --> 0:11:02.640
<v Speaker 4>because it is so much research and development that they

0:11:02.720 --> 0:11:05.240
<v Speaker 4>get all the allounces, et cetera. So I'm not saying

0:11:05.240 --> 0:11:08.040
<v Speaker 4>they're not factors, but they're not as significant as a thought.

0:11:08.760 --> 0:11:12.400
<v Speaker 3>Do you think that the recent announcements are the right

0:11:12.480 --> 0:11:15.040
<v Speaker 3>ones to take on the American Ira?

0:11:15.880 --> 0:11:18.160
<v Speaker 4>I don't think we can take on the American Ira.

0:11:18.960 --> 0:11:21.559
<v Speaker 4>The American Ira is based on printing a lot more

0:11:21.600 --> 0:11:24.440
<v Speaker 4>money than we ever will be able to, and I

0:11:24.440 --> 0:11:27.280
<v Speaker 4>don't think we should try and compete with it. So

0:11:28.120 --> 0:11:31.320
<v Speaker 4>what I'm talking about and what some of the announcements

0:11:31.320 --> 0:11:36.040
<v Speaker 4>have been are targeting investments stuff. So the purpose of

0:11:36.080 --> 0:11:39.320
<v Speaker 4>having a business investment strategy that I'm proposing would be

0:11:39.360 --> 0:11:43.360
<v Speaker 4>saying we can't do everything, but let's take things where

0:11:43.400 --> 0:11:47.440
<v Speaker 4>we have a competitive advantage. Good quote, say, for example,

0:11:47.520 --> 0:11:51.439
<v Speaker 4>take aircraft wing manufacturing. We're good at it. Airbus employed

0:11:51.440 --> 0:11:53.960
<v Speaker 4>load of people there. If you ask the complaints of

0:11:54.000 --> 0:11:57.800
<v Speaker 4>air Bus or Tyota in Derby or whatever, it's why

0:11:57.840 --> 0:12:01.199
<v Speaker 4>don't the suppliers come here? We're having to import all

0:12:01.240 --> 0:12:04.959
<v Speaker 4>these components. Can't you give them incentives like other countries do.

0:12:05.200 --> 0:12:08.520
<v Speaker 4>So there's a cluster around Derby or a cluster around

0:12:08.840 --> 0:12:12.160
<v Speaker 4>brought in in North Wales, and governments need to help

0:12:12.200 --> 0:12:15.400
<v Speaker 4>with that because we need to seduce foreign manufacturing companies

0:12:15.400 --> 0:12:18.360
<v Speaker 4>in this case to come over here and say here's

0:12:18.400 --> 0:12:22.800
<v Speaker 4>a package, a bit of money, make sure that there's

0:12:22.800 --> 0:12:26.040
<v Speaker 4>a suitable site at a certain level of price, energy

0:12:26.120 --> 0:12:29.920
<v Speaker 4>connection skills, you know, getting skills set up in the

0:12:29.960 --> 0:12:33.559
<v Speaker 4>area visas that you want. It's a package. And this

0:12:33.640 --> 0:12:36.440
<v Speaker 4>is what a proactive investment strategy would do. We can't

0:12:36.440 --> 0:12:38.360
<v Speaker 4>say we'll do it for every company everywhere because we

0:12:38.400 --> 0:12:38.880
<v Speaker 4>just don't have.

0:12:39.200 --> 0:12:41.440
<v Speaker 3>You call it a concierge service or something like that.

0:12:41.720 --> 0:12:47.880
<v Speaker 4>Yes, well, yes there's not a person standing at the

0:12:47.880 --> 0:12:49.360
<v Speaker 4>front of government in a nice.

0:12:49.200 --> 0:12:53.160
<v Speaker 2>Uniform, but maybe there should they Maybe they should be.

0:12:53.280 --> 0:12:58.760
<v Speaker 4>Yes, that's right, Yes you get your Foi grab and delberty. Yes,

0:12:59.120 --> 0:13:01.839
<v Speaker 4>it's a nice way saying the other cliche is one

0:13:01.840 --> 0:13:04.800
<v Speaker 4>stop shop, but it's really saying that prospects have an

0:13:04.800 --> 0:13:07.760
<v Speaker 4>account manager like they would in a business who's there

0:13:07.800 --> 0:13:10.040
<v Speaker 4>to find out what it takes to incent them to

0:13:10.080 --> 0:13:12.440
<v Speaker 4>come here, what we need to offer them and that

0:13:12.840 --> 0:13:16.600
<v Speaker 4>so they wouldn't have to troop around different departments because

0:13:16.640 --> 0:13:18.640
<v Speaker 4>at the moment you know they have to. They go

0:13:18.760 --> 0:13:21.320
<v Speaker 4>to transport, they go to healthy, whatever it is in

0:13:21.360 --> 0:13:24.600
<v Speaker 4>their field, and the business department it's very confusing. So

0:13:24.679 --> 0:13:27.280
<v Speaker 4>if you're a big multinational, it's easier because you've got

0:13:27.280 --> 0:13:29.320
<v Speaker 4>a room full of people you hire ex civil servants

0:13:29.320 --> 0:13:31.480
<v Speaker 4>and what have you that know these things. But for

0:13:31.559 --> 0:13:33.800
<v Speaker 4>people that don't already invest here, it just makes it

0:13:33.880 --> 0:13:35.000
<v Speaker 4>very difficult for them.

0:13:35.200 --> 0:13:37.120
<v Speaker 2>So where is this money that could have gone to

0:13:37.160 --> 0:13:38.599
<v Speaker 2>the UK going.

0:13:39.400 --> 0:13:43.480
<v Speaker 4>In no particular order. We've lost business to Spain, We've

0:13:43.520 --> 0:13:47.520
<v Speaker 4>lost business to Ireland. Singapore is the sort of course

0:13:47.559 --> 0:13:51.760
<v Speaker 4>celebra of a very very proactive government which is really

0:13:51.880 --> 0:13:55.520
<v Speaker 4>insenting big money to people. We're losing things now to

0:13:55.559 --> 0:13:58.480
<v Speaker 4>Abu Dabi the Middle East because they can offer them

0:13:58.480 --> 0:14:02.320
<v Speaker 4>free energy and visas. Of course not a problem, but

0:14:02.360 --> 0:14:05.800
<v Speaker 4>it is. It's a general picture. The United States we

0:14:05.840 --> 0:14:08.320
<v Speaker 4>are losing a lot to but that's a global policy.

0:14:08.320 --> 0:14:10.240
<v Speaker 4>We can't because they're basically saying, if you want to

0:14:10.240 --> 0:14:12.920
<v Speaker 4>supply the American market, then you've got to be located here.

0:14:13.080 --> 0:14:14.920
<v Speaker 2>That's I'm sure, right, Yeah, that's.

0:14:14.720 --> 0:14:17.960
<v Speaker 4>A protectionist policy, which has its good points and bad points,

0:14:17.960 --> 0:14:20.000
<v Speaker 4>but that's something you can't compete with.

0:14:20.720 --> 0:14:23.960
<v Speaker 3>How quickly do you think you're the benefits of what

0:14:24.000 --> 0:14:28.440
<v Speaker 3>you're proposing will come about? They sometimes and we've read

0:14:28.480 --> 0:14:30.640
<v Speaker 3>your document. Is it is it ten years time? Is

0:14:30.640 --> 0:14:32.400
<v Speaker 3>it a couple of years time? It's certainly not sort

0:14:32.440 --> 0:14:33.640
<v Speaker 3>of three or four months as I.

0:14:33.520 --> 0:14:35.720
<v Speaker 4>No, it's definitely not three or four months. I think

0:14:36.000 --> 0:14:40.160
<v Speaker 4>because the reason this is a real politicians answer, because

0:14:40.160 --> 0:14:42.600
<v Speaker 4>it's a bit of a waffly answer. I don't know,

0:14:42.680 --> 0:14:43.840
<v Speaker 4>of course, who knows.

0:14:44.240 --> 0:14:46.440
<v Speaker 3>I don't think many politicians say I don't know. Actually,

0:14:47.960 --> 0:14:50.840
<v Speaker 3>question of recovering.

0:14:51.080 --> 0:14:55.240
<v Speaker 4>Yes, that's right, because the reason I don't know is

0:14:55.240 --> 0:14:58.800
<v Speaker 4>because a lot of it is changing sentiments. The perception

0:15:00.120 --> 0:15:04.200
<v Speaker 4>overseas investors of this country is actually not as good

0:15:04.200 --> 0:15:07.120
<v Speaker 4>as it should be. But when they see a business

0:15:07.240 --> 0:15:10.920
<v Speaker 4>investment strategy, when they see a senior investment minister, they

0:15:11.000 --> 0:15:13.520
<v Speaker 4>might think, well, they mean business now, and we're invited

0:15:13.560 --> 0:15:16.440
<v Speaker 4>to good events here and things are beginning to change.

0:15:17.360 --> 0:15:21.360
<v Speaker 4>And I'm afraid Boris did not help matters. Theresa did

0:15:21.400 --> 0:15:24.440
<v Speaker 4>not help matters because she had to be obsessed with Brexit.

0:15:25.200 --> 0:15:31.520
<v Speaker 4>Boris had other priorities. But it's the cliche of turning

0:15:31.600 --> 0:15:34.480
<v Speaker 4>the oil tanker. It's not turning it on. It's not right.

0:15:34.480 --> 0:15:37.000
<v Speaker 4>Here's the bank, it's open, come and get it. Children.

0:15:37.680 --> 0:15:40.400
<v Speaker 4>It's not like that. And I think you know these

0:15:40.480 --> 0:15:41.440
<v Speaker 4>things take time.

0:15:42.160 --> 0:15:44.280
<v Speaker 2>But I guess the problem is the timelines, because you

0:15:44.320 --> 0:15:47.120
<v Speaker 2>don't know what the next regime is. Given how far

0:15:47.200 --> 0:15:49.680
<v Speaker 2>behind the Conservatives are in the poll, that it makes

0:15:49.720 --> 0:15:51.960
<v Speaker 2>it difficult over the next six months, eight months, nine

0:15:51.960 --> 0:15:53.440
<v Speaker 2>months to attract more money.

0:15:53.520 --> 0:15:56.200
<v Speaker 4>You're not suggesting the Conservatives might lose the next election.

0:15:56.040 --> 0:15:58.760
<v Speaker 2>Surely, am I.

0:15:59.040 --> 0:16:03.920
<v Speaker 5>It's very choppy outside outside, But I do think that

0:16:04.040 --> 0:16:06.840
<v Speaker 5>a lot of the stuff I recommend is really cross

0:16:06.920 --> 0:16:11.760
<v Speaker 5>party and is not political and won't be pushed around.

0:16:11.840 --> 0:16:16.800
<v Speaker 4>As an electoral labor. Yes, I have brief Jonathan Reynolds

0:16:16.800 --> 0:16:19.200
<v Speaker 4>and Rachel Reeves on this. I felt I had to

0:16:19.240 --> 0:16:21.400
<v Speaker 4>because the last thing I wanted was Jeremy Hunt saying

0:16:21.400 --> 0:16:24.760
<v Speaker 4>that the autumn statement we were accepted and them saying no.

0:16:25.560 --> 0:16:29.240
<v Speaker 4>And he's spoken publicly Johnny at PwC, I think a

0:16:29.240 --> 0:16:32.120
<v Speaker 4>couple of weeks ago, which he was very encouraging about it.

0:16:32.160 --> 0:16:35.600
<v Speaker 4>So I have. But the only caveat that I'd say

0:16:36.120 --> 0:16:39.600
<v Speaker 4>is that I've learnt in election years, I always say,

0:16:39.720 --> 0:16:43.080
<v Speaker 4>nice people become horrible people because there is this mad

0:16:43.320 --> 0:16:47.000
<v Speaker 4>frenzy of attack. And I just hope this doesn't get

0:16:47.040 --> 0:16:48.640
<v Speaker 4>sucked into it. I don't think it.

0:16:48.760 --> 0:16:49.600
<v Speaker 3>I don't think it will.

0:16:49.720 --> 0:16:52.680
<v Speaker 4>You know, you can imagine next year we'll have, Oh,

0:16:52.800 --> 0:16:55.600
<v Speaker 4>I'm sure Conserves will come up with an anti Kire

0:16:55.760 --> 0:16:59.000
<v Speaker 4>smear campaign. They'll come up with tons of stuff about

0:16:59.120 --> 0:17:02.400
<v Speaker 4>Rishi and the midillionaire banker and this and that. I mean,

0:17:02.440 --> 0:17:05.320
<v Speaker 4>it's pathetic, but that happens in election years, and I

0:17:05.400 --> 0:17:06.800
<v Speaker 4>just hope this doesn't get swept.

0:17:06.920 --> 0:17:09.480
<v Speaker 3>I think I think that the omens are decent for

0:17:09.560 --> 0:17:13.600
<v Speaker 3>you because both sides of the divide need to grow

0:17:13.760 --> 0:17:15.679
<v Speaker 3>the pie we keep calling it, but they need They

0:17:15.720 --> 0:17:17.720
<v Speaker 3>need to increase the amount of money that the UK

0:17:17.760 --> 0:17:20.960
<v Speaker 3>can make, fundamentally in the labour's case, so that they

0:17:21.000 --> 0:17:22.920
<v Speaker 3>can start to spend in a way that a labor

0:17:22.920 --> 0:17:25.760
<v Speaker 3>government would like to and the you knows same with

0:17:25.880 --> 0:17:27.800
<v Speaker 3>different values for the Tory side of things. So I

0:17:27.800 --> 0:17:29.639
<v Speaker 3>think you are probably protected.

0:17:30.000 --> 0:17:33.840
<v Speaker 2>I'm hopeful, but I guess the problem is what you're

0:17:34.840 --> 0:17:37.360
<v Speaker 2>talking about is operationally, I have to get money from

0:17:37.359 --> 0:17:39.439
<v Speaker 2>A to B and get quick answers. You also have

0:17:39.480 --> 0:17:42.080
<v Speaker 2>a structural problem with the economy, which is low productivity.

0:17:42.480 --> 0:17:46.240
<v Speaker 2>It's difficult to find jobs and those are huge barriers

0:17:46.560 --> 0:17:48.040
<v Speaker 2>to actually big investors come now.

0:17:48.080 --> 0:17:52.000
<v Speaker 4>But conversely, investment will help cure those problems.

0:17:52.640 --> 0:17:53.760
<v Speaker 2>It's a catch twenty two, it.

0:17:54.000 --> 0:17:57.399
<v Speaker 4>Is, and that's why the government has to upfront resources

0:17:57.440 --> 0:18:00.960
<v Speaker 4>to do it, because you know the spin off is

0:18:01.080 --> 0:18:03.960
<v Speaker 4>very significant and it isn't I call it foreign direct

0:18:04.040 --> 0:18:06.880
<v Speaker 4>investment simply because that's what Jeremy Hunt asked me to do.

0:18:07.080 --> 0:18:10.040
<v Speaker 4>It's all investment. If you if your GSK or something,

0:18:10.119 --> 0:18:12.240
<v Speaker 4>your pound is as good in any country in the world,

0:18:12.240 --> 0:18:14.520
<v Speaker 4>as it is here. The fact that you're located here

0:18:14.720 --> 0:18:17.560
<v Speaker 4>just as coincidental. So it is. You know, we have

0:18:18.640 --> 0:18:23.240
<v Speaker 4>we have rough figures. You know, we invest, including domestic

0:18:23.400 --> 0:18:26.240
<v Speaker 4>and for in about ten percent of our GDP in

0:18:26.240 --> 0:18:30.040
<v Speaker 4>investment other countries in the g whatever it is about

0:18:30.080 --> 0:18:34.200
<v Speaker 4>twelve percent. The difference is fifty billion pounds a year. Well,

0:18:34.200 --> 0:18:37.120
<v Speaker 4>if a third of that comes from extra foreign investment

0:18:37.200 --> 0:18:39.120
<v Speaker 4>or half, it's very significant.

0:18:40.080 --> 0:18:42.720
<v Speaker 2>When you speak to a lot of big investors, they

0:18:42.800 --> 0:18:45.200
<v Speaker 2>just ask, well, what's going on with Randa? I mean,

0:18:45.560 --> 0:18:47.240
<v Speaker 2>how do you answer? Again? You can, you can have

0:18:47.280 --> 0:18:51.240
<v Speaker 2>all the best systems in place, but if investors don't

0:18:51.280 --> 0:18:54.720
<v Speaker 2>really understand the longer term policy of a country, is

0:18:54.720 --> 0:18:58.160
<v Speaker 2>that not impossible to then adjust and attract investment.

0:18:58.320 --> 0:19:01.359
<v Speaker 4>Well, but why is Ruanda relat to? I know you

0:19:01.359 --> 0:19:03.280
<v Speaker 4>asked the questions, I'm supposed to answer it, But why

0:19:03.600 --> 0:19:04.639
<v Speaker 4>is Ruanda relevant to?

0:19:05.040 --> 0:19:07.440
<v Speaker 2>They don't understand? Because they don't understand.

0:19:07.080 --> 0:19:09.760
<v Speaker 3>And I think it adds to a sense that the

0:19:09.760 --> 0:19:11.360
<v Speaker 3>government cannot do what it wants.

0:19:11.560 --> 0:19:14.320
<v Speaker 4>It's very valid to say anything that leads to instability

0:19:15.600 --> 0:19:20.720
<v Speaker 4>will lead to investment decisions. You know, big companies told

0:19:20.760 --> 0:19:25.119
<v Speaker 4>me that because of Liz Trusts episode, they were factoring

0:19:25.160 --> 0:19:28.800
<v Speaker 4>in a risk factor in their calculations, which they've never

0:19:28.840 --> 0:19:31.280
<v Speaker 4>done for this country before. Plenty of countries they do,

0:19:31.520 --> 0:19:34.560
<v Speaker 4>you know, they do their projections and they put in

0:19:34.600 --> 0:19:38.200
<v Speaker 4>a percentage risk, a bit like an insurance company would,

0:19:38.640 --> 0:19:41.280
<v Speaker 4>and they were the first time in the history they've

0:19:41.280 --> 0:19:43.600
<v Speaker 4>done it for this country. I had hoped that the

0:19:43.600 --> 0:19:46.800
<v Speaker 4>combination of Rishi Sunak and Jamie Hunt would have stopped

0:19:46.840 --> 0:19:49.960
<v Speaker 4>that and it returned to normal. But if there are

0:19:49.960 --> 0:19:53.040
<v Speaker 4>stuff like Ruanda, maybe the election itself, even though if

0:19:53.119 --> 0:19:55.439
<v Speaker 4>Labour's saying the kind of things they are about business

0:19:55.520 --> 0:19:58.800
<v Speaker 4>and investment, and I have every reason where they are publicly,

0:19:59.400 --> 0:20:02.399
<v Speaker 4>maybe that will be okay. Whereas Corbyn, of course, there

0:20:02.520 --> 0:20:03.480
<v Speaker 4>was a total fear.

0:20:04.040 --> 0:20:06.399
<v Speaker 2>Do you think that the UK is held to higher

0:20:06.440 --> 0:20:10.920
<v Speaker 2>standard than other countries in Europe to attract investment?

0:20:11.200 --> 0:20:13.760
<v Speaker 4>No, I don't think so. But one of the things

0:20:13.760 --> 0:20:18.600
<v Speaker 4>that I absolutely amazing is that other countries have political turmoil.

0:20:18.920 --> 0:20:22.200
<v Speaker 4>We've had it here within well, we've had three changes

0:20:22.240 --> 0:20:25.200
<v Speaker 4>to policy, a lot within one political party. But other

0:20:25.240 --> 0:20:27.760
<v Speaker 4>countries who have it much worse than us, like Spain,

0:20:27.840 --> 0:20:32.199
<v Speaker 4>for example, who people generally they don't have a government,

0:20:32.320 --> 0:20:35.520
<v Speaker 4>or it's a minority government, or there's some political problems.

0:20:36.160 --> 0:20:39.960
<v Speaker 4>Yet they managed to keep the business strategy the investment

0:20:40.040 --> 0:20:43.520
<v Speaker 4>strategy separate. So no one that looks at Spain thinks

0:20:43.560 --> 0:20:47.159
<v Speaker 4>there's a political risk. Look at Ireland, you've got what

0:20:47.240 --> 0:20:50.879
<v Speaker 4>I read, every possibility of shin Fein, basically a revolutionary

0:20:50.920 --> 0:20:53.760
<v Speaker 4>party taking over the country. But no one's saying in

0:20:53.800 --> 0:20:56.600
<v Speaker 4>the Irish Investment Agency, oh, there'll be a change of it.

0:20:56.960 --> 0:20:59.160
<v Speaker 4>The leader of chin Fein makes one speech saying, look,

0:20:59.200 --> 0:21:02.160
<v Speaker 4>it's business as you. As far as that's concerned, everyone's

0:21:02.200 --> 0:21:05.320
<v Speaker 4>fine with it. But with us there is because of

0:21:05.440 --> 0:21:09.760
<v Speaker 4>what the political turmoil, the lack of consistency in policy,

0:21:10.720 --> 0:21:14.399
<v Speaker 4>and fear of anarchy, which was in the case of

0:21:14.480 --> 0:21:17.440
<v Speaker 4>Liszt trusts and quality. I'm afraid not that's what they intended,

0:21:17.480 --> 0:21:20.320
<v Speaker 4>but that's what came. There is this fear of lack

0:21:20.359 --> 0:21:23.440
<v Speaker 4>of consistency that does affect investment.

0:21:23.840 --> 0:21:25.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but the UK is meant to be best in class.

0:21:25.800 --> 0:21:29.479
<v Speaker 2>I mean, the southern countries, Spain, Greece to the all

0:21:29.560 --> 0:21:34.600
<v Speaker 2>had economic crisis. The UK should be better, I hope.

0:21:34.640 --> 0:21:40.280
<v Speaker 4>So I no, it should be better and it can

0:21:40.320 --> 0:21:43.679
<v Speaker 4>be better, but government has to organize itself in a

0:21:43.760 --> 0:21:45.920
<v Speaker 4>much more investment friendly way.

0:21:46.600 --> 0:21:51.240
<v Speaker 2>Thank you so much, thanks for listening to this week's

0:21:51.320 --> 0:21:53.560
<v Speaker 2>in the City. We'll be back next week, but in

0:21:53.560 --> 0:21:55.679
<v Speaker 2>the meantime, if you like our show, please head on

0:21:55.720 --> 0:21:59.200
<v Speaker 2>over to wherever you listen to podcasts and rate, review

0:21:59.320 --> 0:22:02.280
<v Speaker 2>and subc It does help people find the show. This

0:22:02.359 --> 0:22:05.600
<v Speaker 2>episode was hosted by me Francine Laquis and Alegra Stratton.

0:22:05.880 --> 0:22:09.680
<v Speaker 2>It was produced by Samersadi and Tiffany Schoy. Additional editing

0:22:09.680 --> 0:22:12.200
<v Speaker 2>by Blake Maples and special thanks to Lord Harrington.