WEBVTT - #406 Wrongful Conviction: Junk Science - Roadside Drug Test Evidence

0:00:01.440 --> 0:00:04.160
<v Speaker 1>Hey, folks, Kate Judson here. I'm a lawyer and the

0:00:04.200 --> 0:00:07.760
<v Speaker 1>executive director of the Center for Integrity and Forensic Sciences.

0:00:09.520 --> 0:00:12.720
<v Speaker 1>We're back with another episode of Junk Science, a series

0:00:12.720 --> 0:00:16.000
<v Speaker 1>we first released in twenty twenty, but these stories are

0:00:16.160 --> 0:00:20.160
<v Speaker 1>just as relevant as ever. This week's episode focuses on

0:00:20.320 --> 0:00:24.360
<v Speaker 1>roadside drug tests, a highly unreliable method of drug testing.

0:00:25.239 --> 0:00:28.400
<v Speaker 1>The testing kits most police departments use cost about two

0:00:28.480 --> 0:00:32.200
<v Speaker 1>dollars apiece and are far from reliable. They often turn

0:00:32.280 --> 0:00:35.760
<v Speaker 1>up false positives and are used to coerce people to

0:00:35.760 --> 0:00:42.640
<v Speaker 1>plead guilty to crimes they did not commit. Like many

0:00:42.680 --> 0:00:45.320
<v Speaker 1>of the other junk sciences we've learned about in the series,

0:00:45.600 --> 0:00:49.360
<v Speaker 1>roadside drug tests are often thought of as valid and reliable,

0:00:49.680 --> 0:00:52.400
<v Speaker 1>but they just aren't. And these cases are a little

0:00:52.400 --> 0:00:56.280
<v Speaker 1>different because they're not being used as evidence at trial,

0:00:56.720 --> 0:01:01.200
<v Speaker 1>where it's slightly but not very much easier for lawyers

0:01:01.240 --> 0:01:05.720
<v Speaker 1>to challenge that conviction after the fact. Instead, they're used

0:01:05.760 --> 0:01:10.160
<v Speaker 1>to coerce. Please. That's because folks who are locked up

0:01:10.280 --> 0:01:13.080
<v Speaker 1>and desperate to get out might take a plead of

0:01:13.160 --> 0:01:17.480
<v Speaker 1>probation so they can regain their freedom when the alternative

0:01:17.520 --> 0:01:20.320
<v Speaker 1>is waiting in jail to go to trial. You'll hear

0:01:20.360 --> 0:01:23.680
<v Speaker 1>in this episode how even a short jail stay can

0:01:23.880 --> 0:01:27.679
<v Speaker 1>ruin someone's life. If we care about justice and we

0:01:27.800 --> 0:01:31.200
<v Speaker 1>care about the truth, we can't use junk science to

0:01:31.280 --> 0:01:35.120
<v Speaker 1>lock people up. And that's especially true for folks who

0:01:35.240 --> 0:01:39.360
<v Speaker 1>haven't yet had trials, folks who are presumed innocent.

0:01:46.160 --> 0:01:49.280
<v Speaker 2>You're sitting in the passenger seat of your car, staring

0:01:49.320 --> 0:01:52.760
<v Speaker 2>out the window. Your boyfriend is driving in. You look

0:01:52.800 --> 0:01:55.680
<v Speaker 2>over at him. You can tell that he's getting tired.

0:01:55.720 --> 0:01:59.960
<v Speaker 2>It's been a long day. You left Louisiana five hours ago,

0:02:00.360 --> 0:02:04.840
<v Speaker 2>and he's been driving the entire time. You're going to Houston,

0:02:04.960 --> 0:02:06.880
<v Speaker 2>where he has an interview for a job on an

0:02:06.920 --> 0:02:10.120
<v Speaker 2>oil rig. You find the monotony of the drive to

0:02:10.160 --> 0:02:14.400
<v Speaker 2>be somewhat calming. It's a big difference from your usual

0:02:14.480 --> 0:02:17.720
<v Speaker 2>day to day of running around doing your job and

0:02:17.800 --> 0:02:21.000
<v Speaker 2>taking care of your teenage son who has special needs.

0:02:21.720 --> 0:02:24.840
<v Speaker 2>Of course, you love your kids and your job is great,

0:02:24.919 --> 0:02:28.000
<v Speaker 2>but for the first time in a while, you feel

0:02:28.040 --> 0:02:31.960
<v Speaker 2>yourself really relaxing, and you're happy to have nothing to

0:02:32.000 --> 0:02:34.680
<v Speaker 2>do or worry about for the next couple of days.

0:02:35.680 --> 0:02:38.280
<v Speaker 2>When you finally get to the motel in Houston, You're

0:02:38.280 --> 0:02:42.440
<v Speaker 2>both exhausted. You dump your suitcases at the foot of

0:02:42.480 --> 0:02:45.440
<v Speaker 2>the bed, and you're tempted to skip dinner and just

0:02:45.600 --> 0:02:48.320
<v Speaker 2>stay in for the rest of the night, but you

0:02:48.360 --> 0:02:50.160
<v Speaker 2>don't want your boyfriend to go to bed on an

0:02:50.200 --> 0:02:53.359
<v Speaker 2>empty stomach, so you both get back in the car,

0:02:53.840 --> 0:02:56.680
<v Speaker 2>grab some hamburgers from a fast food drive through, and

0:02:57.160 --> 0:03:02.200
<v Speaker 2>then start heading straight back to the motel. Your boyfriend

0:03:02.280 --> 0:03:05.640
<v Speaker 2>rubs his eyes when he changes lanes, and out of

0:03:05.680 --> 0:03:10.400
<v Speaker 2>nowhere you see blue and red lights flashing behind your

0:03:10.440 --> 0:03:24.000
<v Speaker 2>car and a siren blaring. You look up and watching

0:03:24.080 --> 0:03:27.359
<v Speaker 2>the rear view mirror as a police officer slowly walks

0:03:27.440 --> 0:03:33.680
<v Speaker 2>up to the driver's side window, license and registration. You

0:03:33.800 --> 0:03:37.360
<v Speaker 2>rummage in the glove compartment for the registration. Well, what's

0:03:37.400 --> 0:03:42.280
<v Speaker 2>the problem, officer, your boyfriend asks, no signal wall changing lanes,

0:03:43.440 --> 0:03:46.680
<v Speaker 2>You hand the registration to your boyfriend, who in turn

0:03:46.760 --> 0:03:51.080
<v Speaker 2>hands it to the officer. License. The officer says again,

0:03:52.240 --> 0:03:58.440
<v Speaker 2>your boyfriend holds tight onto the steering wheel. I don't

0:03:58.480 --> 0:04:03.000
<v Speaker 2>have a license, sir. Please step out of the vehicle.

0:04:03.960 --> 0:04:08.080
<v Speaker 2>Your boyfriend gets out, closing the door behind him. The

0:04:08.120 --> 0:04:10.920
<v Speaker 2>officer sticks his head into the car window and looks around.

0:04:11.720 --> 0:04:15.960
<v Speaker 2>He never makes eye contact with you. Then the officer

0:04:16.080 --> 0:04:19.000
<v Speaker 2>steps away from your car and calls out to his partner,

0:04:19.240 --> 0:04:22.680
<v Speaker 2>who's sitting in the police car. There's a needle in here,

0:04:23.000 --> 0:04:29.279
<v Speaker 2>the officer says, excuse me, what are you talking about.

0:04:30.160 --> 0:04:33.320
<v Speaker 2>You have no idea what the officer thinks he saw,

0:04:34.320 --> 0:04:36.680
<v Speaker 2>but you certainly did not have any kind of needle

0:04:36.720 --> 0:04:41.200
<v Speaker 2>in your car. The cop ignores your question and walks

0:04:41.240 --> 0:04:44.280
<v Speaker 2>over to the passenger window. Ma'am, I'm going to need

0:04:44.320 --> 0:04:47.440
<v Speaker 2>your consent to search the car, and I'll tell you

0:04:47.520 --> 0:04:50.040
<v Speaker 2>right now. You don't consent, we're gonna be sitting here

0:04:50.040 --> 0:04:52.479
<v Speaker 2>a long time until we can get a canine out

0:04:52.480 --> 0:04:56.039
<v Speaker 2>here to sweep the car. You don't have anything to hide,

0:04:56.279 --> 0:05:00.159
<v Speaker 2>so you say, yeah, okay, go ahead. You stand on

0:05:00.200 --> 0:05:02.120
<v Speaker 2>the side of the road with your boyfriend in the

0:05:02.200 --> 0:05:06.880
<v Speaker 2>thick Texas heat while both officers search the car. A

0:05:06.920 --> 0:05:10.480
<v Speaker 2>few minutes later, the first officer stands up straight. It

0:05:10.520 --> 0:05:14.080
<v Speaker 2>looks like he's pinching something between his index finger and

0:05:14.120 --> 0:05:17.240
<v Speaker 2>his thumb, and he's holding it up to the moonlight.

0:05:18.080 --> 0:05:19.960
<v Speaker 2>You can't see what it is, but you see that.

0:05:20.040 --> 0:05:23.400
<v Speaker 2>The officer says something to his partner, who then comes

0:05:23.440 --> 0:05:27.280
<v Speaker 2>over to you. Man, we have reason to believe that

0:05:27.360 --> 0:05:31.760
<v Speaker 2>there's crack cocaine in your car, the officer says. He

0:05:31.839 --> 0:05:35.159
<v Speaker 2>tells you both to put your hands behind your back.

0:05:36.279 --> 0:05:40.239
<v Speaker 2>He starts cuffing your boyfriend, and you're adrenaline starts pumping.

0:05:40.760 --> 0:05:43.640
<v Speaker 2>You're sweating now, and you can't tell if it's the

0:05:43.880 --> 0:05:47.640
<v Speaker 2>ninety degree heat or if it's pure nerves and anxiety.

0:05:47.960 --> 0:05:51.359
<v Speaker 2>As the officer tightens the cuffs painfully around your wrist.

0:05:52.360 --> 0:05:55.160
<v Speaker 2>You have the wrong idea here. I don't have drugs

0:05:55.160 --> 0:05:58.480
<v Speaker 2>in my car. I don't do drugs. I've never done drugs.

0:05:59.560 --> 0:06:02.880
<v Speaker 2>One off walks over to you and then takes you

0:06:02.960 --> 0:06:06.480
<v Speaker 2>to the police car. The other one opens up the trunk.

0:06:07.200 --> 0:06:10.120
<v Speaker 2>He takes out something that looks like a ziplock baggie,

0:06:10.160 --> 0:06:13.560
<v Speaker 2>then walks back over to you. He opens the bag

0:06:13.600 --> 0:06:17.440
<v Speaker 2>and pulls out a test tube. Then he takes what

0:06:17.480 --> 0:06:20.159
<v Speaker 2>he's been pinching between his fingers and drops it into

0:06:20.200 --> 0:06:24.680
<v Speaker 2>the tube. He shakes it around, looks at it. Then

0:06:24.720 --> 0:06:28.679
<v Speaker 2>he looks at you, and a wide grin creeps across

0:06:28.680 --> 0:06:32.719
<v Speaker 2>his face. He waves the tube right in front of

0:06:32.760 --> 0:06:36.960
<v Speaker 2>your nose. A liquid that seems to change from red

0:06:37.000 --> 0:06:39.600
<v Speaker 2>to blue and the flashing lights is dangled in front

0:06:39.640 --> 0:06:45.720
<v Speaker 2>of you. You're busted, ma'am, the cop says. The cops

0:06:45.760 --> 0:06:49.240
<v Speaker 2>take you to jail. Your boyfriend has charged with driving

0:06:49.279 --> 0:06:53.159
<v Speaker 2>without a license and is released soon after. But you

0:06:53.200 --> 0:06:55.680
<v Speaker 2>don't know that yet because you're placed in a tiny

0:06:55.720 --> 0:06:58.919
<v Speaker 2>holding cell with one other woman who tells you that

0:06:59.000 --> 0:07:03.600
<v Speaker 2>she murdered someone. You're feeling sick and you still haven't

0:07:03.640 --> 0:07:08.080
<v Speaker 2>eaten all day. You're terrified, but you're not just worried

0:07:08.120 --> 0:07:15.400
<v Speaker 2>about yourself. You're really worried about your son. Someone calls

0:07:15.440 --> 0:07:18.800
<v Speaker 2>your name from a thick plastic window that separates you

0:07:18.840 --> 0:07:21.600
<v Speaker 2>from the people working at the jail. You walk up

0:07:21.640 --> 0:07:24.280
<v Speaker 2>to the window and see a tired looking man on

0:07:24.320 --> 0:07:28.240
<v Speaker 2>the other side. He introduces himself as the court appointed

0:07:28.280 --> 0:07:32.880
<v Speaker 2>defense attorney. He tells you you're being charged for possession

0:07:32.920 --> 0:07:36.280
<v Speaker 2>of crack cocaine. Look, this is a felony, he says,

0:07:36.640 --> 0:07:43.440
<v Speaker 2>and you're facing two years in state prison. You're in disbelief. Jesus,

0:07:44.200 --> 0:07:47.880
<v Speaker 2>how is this possible. The attorney looks down at his

0:07:47.960 --> 0:07:51.680
<v Speaker 2>papers and says, look, you have a choice. It's not

0:07:51.880 --> 0:07:54.040
<v Speaker 2>much of a choice, but you do have a choice.

0:07:54.600 --> 0:07:57.600
<v Speaker 2>The prosecutor is offering you a plea deal. If you

0:07:57.680 --> 0:08:00.800
<v Speaker 2>plead guilty, you'll get a forty five five day sentence

0:08:00.840 --> 0:08:02.960
<v Speaker 2>in jail, and you'll probably only have to serve half

0:08:03.000 --> 0:08:07.440
<v Speaker 2>of that. You say, I'm innocent. I'm not going to

0:08:07.480 --> 0:08:12.040
<v Speaker 2>plead guilty to something I didn't do. The defense attorney

0:08:12.480 --> 0:08:15.120
<v Speaker 2>kind of leans in a little bit and looks at

0:08:15.120 --> 0:08:19.320
<v Speaker 2>you through his wire rim glasses and says, ma'am, they

0:08:19.600 --> 0:08:22.000
<v Speaker 2>tested the substance they found on the floor of your

0:08:22.040 --> 0:08:25.240
<v Speaker 2>car and it came up positive for crack cocaine. So

0:08:25.880 --> 0:08:29.080
<v Speaker 2>according to this test, there was crack in your car.

0:08:29.680 --> 0:08:32.920
<v Speaker 2>Now you can wait until the forensics lab runs another

0:08:33.000 --> 0:08:36.080
<v Speaker 2>test on it, but there's a huge backlog. You could

0:08:36.120 --> 0:08:39.679
<v Speaker 2>wait months for that test to come back. You begin

0:08:39.800 --> 0:08:43.560
<v Speaker 2>to physically shake. You're on the verge of bursting out

0:08:43.640 --> 0:08:46.160
<v Speaker 2>in tears right there in the middle of the jail.

0:08:47.600 --> 0:08:51.760
<v Speaker 2>You think about your options. Months in jail, waiting for

0:08:51.840 --> 0:08:55.920
<v Speaker 2>the evidence that will prove your innocent, two years in

0:08:55.960 --> 0:08:59.560
<v Speaker 2>prison if it doesn't, And can you even trust the

0:08:59.640 --> 0:09:02.000
<v Speaker 2>tests if the one that they did on the side

0:09:02.040 --> 0:09:04.320
<v Speaker 2>of the road was clearly wrong. I mean there was

0:09:04.360 --> 0:09:08.280
<v Speaker 2>no crack in your car. You think about your youngest son,

0:09:08.520 --> 0:09:11.280
<v Speaker 2>and you're terrified of what's going to happen if you

0:09:11.320 --> 0:09:15.720
<v Speaker 2>can't get out of your fast. He really needs you.

0:09:15.720 --> 0:09:19.559
<v Speaker 2>You work managing an apartment complex. Part of your compensation

0:09:19.880 --> 0:09:21.480
<v Speaker 2>is that you get to live in an apartment in

0:09:21.520 --> 0:09:24.360
<v Speaker 2>the building that you manage. It at least allows you

0:09:24.440 --> 0:09:27.920
<v Speaker 2>to stay close to your son at all times. Right now,

0:09:27.960 --> 0:09:30.640
<v Speaker 2>he's with his dad. But if you're stuck here for

0:09:30.760 --> 0:09:35.480
<v Speaker 2>months or god forbid, years, you'll lose your job, your home,

0:09:36.000 --> 0:09:39.520
<v Speaker 2>the safety net for you and your kid. The decision

0:09:39.559 --> 0:09:42.960
<v Speaker 2>is basically made for you. You can't sit in prison

0:09:43.000 --> 0:09:46.480
<v Speaker 2>for months. You have to get out and get out

0:09:46.520 --> 0:09:50.520
<v Speaker 2>as quickly as you can. The next thing you know,

0:09:51.320 --> 0:09:55.040
<v Speaker 2>you're standing in front of a judge. You can't stop trembling,

0:09:56.080 --> 0:10:02.679
<v Speaker 2>You're weeping uncontrollably. You can barely breathe. Somehow, When the

0:10:02.760 --> 0:10:06.679
<v Speaker 2>judge asks you, how do you plead, you force out

0:10:06.720 --> 0:10:13.600
<v Speaker 2>the words I plead guilty. They take you back to

0:10:13.640 --> 0:10:16.720
<v Speaker 2>a cell where you'll serve twenty one days of the

0:10:16.760 --> 0:10:20.760
<v Speaker 2>forty five day sentence you were given. The prosecutor files

0:10:20.760 --> 0:10:23.360
<v Speaker 2>a motion for the evidence in your case to be destroyed.

0:10:24.440 --> 0:10:28.120
<v Speaker 2>After twenty one days, you're let out of jail. Your

0:10:28.160 --> 0:10:32.840
<v Speaker 2>worst fears have been realized. You've been fired, you've been

0:10:32.960 --> 0:10:36.040
<v Speaker 2>kicked out of your apartment. You don't know where most

0:10:36.080 --> 0:10:39.679
<v Speaker 2>of your belongings are, and you don't know where to turn.

0:10:43.960 --> 0:10:46.480
<v Speaker 2>The story you just heard is based on the true

0:10:46.559 --> 0:10:50.600
<v Speaker 2>events of Amy Albritton's wrongful conviction that resulted from a

0:10:50.760 --> 0:10:56.240
<v Speaker 2>roadside drug test. Somehow, the prosecutor's order to destroy the

0:10:56.320 --> 0:11:01.720
<v Speaker 2>evidence never got signed off. On substance they found in

0:11:01.760 --> 0:11:05.479
<v Speaker 2>her car that they claim tested positive for crack cocaine,

0:11:06.400 --> 0:11:11.000
<v Speaker 2>It turned out to be a food crumb. Based on

0:11:11.120 --> 0:11:16.040
<v Speaker 2>the junk science of roadside drug testing, the steady life

0:11:16.040 --> 0:11:19.920
<v Speaker 2>that Amy built for herself and her family was completely

0:11:20.000 --> 0:11:26.920
<v Speaker 2>turned upside down, and Amy isn't the only one. I'm

0:11:27.000 --> 0:11:30.920
<v Speaker 2>Josh Dubin, civil rights and criminal defense attorney, an innocent

0:11:31.040 --> 0:11:35.000
<v Speaker 2>ambassador to the Innocence Project in New York. Today, on

0:11:35.120 --> 0:11:42.080
<v Speaker 2>wrongful Conviction junk Science, we explore roadside drug testing. Turns out,

0:11:42.480 --> 0:11:46.480
<v Speaker 2>these faulty tests, which cost police departments two dollars a

0:11:46.480 --> 0:11:50.640
<v Speaker 2>piece or less, are widely used across the United States.

0:11:51.400 --> 0:11:54.480
<v Speaker 2>They cause countless people to plead guilty to crimes they

0:11:54.520 --> 0:11:59.480
<v Speaker 2>didn't commit. These tests continue to be used despite scientific

0:11:59.559 --> 0:12:15.040
<v Speaker 2>evidence that proves just how ineffective they are. In nineteen

0:12:15.160 --> 0:12:18.200
<v Speaker 2>seventy three, during the height of the War on Drugs

0:12:18.240 --> 0:12:21.559
<v Speaker 2>in the United States, a chemist by the name of L. J.

0:12:21.800 --> 0:12:25.840
<v Speaker 2>Scott Jr. Was tasked with creating a test that could

0:12:25.880 --> 0:12:30.920
<v Speaker 2>confirm the presence of cocaine. Now, Scott was already aware

0:12:31.080 --> 0:12:34.520
<v Speaker 2>of one chemical that was being used to test for cocaine,

0:12:34.720 --> 0:12:39.240
<v Speaker 2>but the problem was it was highly unreliable. This faulty

0:12:39.320 --> 0:12:42.240
<v Speaker 2>test was made up of a pink liquid, a chemical

0:12:42.320 --> 0:12:47.800
<v Speaker 2>called cobalt thiocyanate. When cocaine was added to this pink liquid,

0:12:48.040 --> 0:12:52.080
<v Speaker 2>it turned blue. And so the thinking went, whenever the

0:12:52.120 --> 0:12:55.079
<v Speaker 2>pink liquid turns blue, we can know if there is

0:12:55.160 --> 0:13:00.360
<v Speaker 2>cocaine present. But the problem was that it wasn't only cocaine,

0:13:00.440 --> 0:13:03.960
<v Speaker 2>but plenty of other substances that could also turn this

0:13:04.120 --> 0:13:08.120
<v Speaker 2>pink chemical blue. So Scott set out to work on

0:13:08.160 --> 0:13:12.559
<v Speaker 2>creating a more accurate test. He experimented with other chemicals,

0:13:12.720 --> 0:13:15.800
<v Speaker 2>and finally he came up with a three step test.

0:13:16.880 --> 0:13:21.160
<v Speaker 2>Here's how it worked. A small sealable bag contained three

0:13:21.280 --> 0:13:26.479
<v Speaker 2>vials of chemicals. First, the substance suspected to be cocaine

0:13:26.960 --> 0:13:29.920
<v Speaker 2>was added to the first vial that contained the same

0:13:30.040 --> 0:13:35.199
<v Speaker 2>pink chemical as the original test, cobalt thiocyanate. If that

0:13:35.360 --> 0:13:40.400
<v Speaker 2>term blue it meant the substance might be cocaine. Then

0:13:40.800 --> 0:13:43.480
<v Speaker 2>the vial was placed into the small bag with the

0:13:43.520 --> 0:13:47.480
<v Speaker 2>other two vials. The first vial was broken open so

0:13:47.600 --> 0:13:50.679
<v Speaker 2>the liquid contents would leave the vial and sit at

0:13:50.720 --> 0:13:55.160
<v Speaker 2>the bottom of the transparent bag. Then the second vial

0:13:55.160 --> 0:13:59.280
<v Speaker 2>would be broken open. This vial contained a second chemical,

0:14:00.040 --> 0:14:03.920
<v Speaker 2>hydrochloric acid, that was supposed to mix with the first

0:14:04.000 --> 0:14:08.760
<v Speaker 2>chemical and turn the substance pink again. Then the third

0:14:08.840 --> 0:14:13.800
<v Speaker 2>vial would be broken. This final vial was filled with chloroform.

0:14:14.120 --> 0:14:16.480
<v Speaker 2>If the liquid mixture at the bottom of the bag

0:14:16.800 --> 0:14:20.680
<v Speaker 2>split into two layers so that a pink liquid floated

0:14:20.720 --> 0:14:24.400
<v Speaker 2>to the top and blue sank to the bottom, Scott

0:14:24.440 --> 0:14:30.360
<v Speaker 2>said this confirmed that the substance being tested was indeed cocaine.

0:14:30.440 --> 0:14:33.480
<v Speaker 2>After working on the test for nine months, Scott was

0:14:33.600 --> 0:14:37.160
<v Speaker 2>so sure of it that he declared the method proposed

0:14:37.200 --> 0:14:42.200
<v Speaker 2>herein is almost impossible to misinterpret. It is highly sensitive

0:14:42.280 --> 0:14:47.920
<v Speaker 2>and specific. Officers started carrying these portable roadside drug tests

0:14:47.960 --> 0:14:51.200
<v Speaker 2>on them while they patrolled neighborhoods and pulled people over

0:14:51.280 --> 0:14:55.520
<v Speaker 2>for traffic violations. They started using the tests on people

0:14:55.560 --> 0:14:59.640
<v Speaker 2>suspected of possessing drugs, and the arrest started flooding in.

0:15:00.880 --> 0:15:03.840
<v Speaker 2>But this test turned out to be not quite as

0:15:03.880 --> 0:15:08.680
<v Speaker 2>full proof as Scott thought. A study by toxicologists found

0:15:08.720 --> 0:15:12.640
<v Speaker 2>that the three vile tests would also show positive results

0:15:12.720 --> 0:15:18.080
<v Speaker 2>for substances other than cocaine. Lytocane, for example, a common

0:15:18.160 --> 0:15:21.320
<v Speaker 2>numbing agent found in many first aid kits used to

0:15:21.360 --> 0:15:27.240
<v Speaker 2>soothe cuts and burns, also tested positive. Nevertheless, Scott started

0:15:27.280 --> 0:15:30.680
<v Speaker 2>his own company that sold drug test kits to law enforcement.

0:15:31.400 --> 0:15:36.560
<v Speaker 2>This company still exists today, and interestingly enough, he stopped

0:15:36.600 --> 0:15:40.800
<v Speaker 2>selling the kits with the three vile process. Instead, he

0:15:40.880 --> 0:15:44.080
<v Speaker 2>went back to the one step process, the test with

0:15:44.440 --> 0:15:48.040
<v Speaker 2>just the pink liquid that was already known to be faulty,

0:15:48.440 --> 0:15:52.200
<v Speaker 2>and to test positive for so many other substances. He

0:15:52.360 --> 0:15:55.600
<v Speaker 2>did this so that he could sell them for less money,

0:15:56.160 --> 0:16:01.000
<v Speaker 2>and they were a hit, and he expanded beyond cocaine tests.

0:16:01.680 --> 0:16:07.360
<v Speaker 2>His company also sells tests for opiates, MDMA, marijuana, LSD,

0:16:07.720 --> 0:16:11.920
<v Speaker 2>bath salts, and meth amphetamine. His website boasts that the

0:16:11.960 --> 0:16:15.840
<v Speaker 2>tests coming easy to use, cheap packaging that prevents officers

0:16:15.840 --> 0:16:20.400
<v Speaker 2>from cutting their fingers while breaking the bials. When interviewed

0:16:20.400 --> 0:16:23.720
<v Speaker 2>by reporters from Pro Publica, Scott said that he had

0:16:23.840 --> 0:16:27.440
<v Speaker 2>no idea that these tests alone could send people to prison,

0:16:28.280 --> 0:16:34.760
<v Speaker 2>but indeed they were countless innocent people, including Amy Albritton,

0:16:35.400 --> 0:16:40.560
<v Speaker 2>ended up convicted based on cheap, highly flawed roadside tests

0:16:41.080 --> 0:16:42.040
<v Speaker 2>just like these.

0:16:46.200 --> 0:16:48.200
<v Speaker 3>Now, the problem with the drug kit is that these

0:16:48.240 --> 0:16:52.720
<v Speaker 3>things are incredibly unreliable, and so they come up positive

0:16:52.840 --> 0:16:57.800
<v Speaker 3>for things like chocolate, like cleaning supplies like aspirin, like sugar,

0:16:58.040 --> 0:17:02.720
<v Speaker 3>weight gain powder, candle, wax, drywall, so sand. They all

0:17:02.720 --> 0:17:05.120
<v Speaker 3>come back and test positive for narcotics. Because these things

0:17:05.119 --> 0:17:07.280
<v Speaker 3>are very unreliable and they're not supposed to be used

0:17:07.359 --> 0:17:12.480
<v Speaker 3>specifically for actually getting a conviction, but many people plead

0:17:12.640 --> 0:17:14.480
<v Speaker 3>in the system to never get to a trial, and

0:17:14.520 --> 0:17:17.439
<v Speaker 3>these are used as the only evidence to actually obtain

0:17:17.440 --> 0:17:19.840
<v Speaker 3>a conviction. That's what happened in Amy's case.

0:17:20.680 --> 0:17:24.080
<v Speaker 2>On our show today, we're talking to Greg Gloud. Greg

0:17:24.280 --> 0:17:29.439
<v Speaker 2>is a policy fellow at Americans for Prosperity Now. Americans

0:17:29.440 --> 0:17:34.200
<v Speaker 2>for Prosperity is a grassroots organization that educates citizens about

0:17:34.359 --> 0:17:38.320
<v Speaker 2>policy issues at the local, state, and national level, and

0:17:38.440 --> 0:17:41.320
<v Speaker 2>one of the issues that Greg works on is criminal

0:17:41.480 --> 0:17:44.600
<v Speaker 2>justice reform. So I want to go into detail about

0:17:44.680 --> 0:17:48.320
<v Speaker 2>these drug testing kits, walk us through some of the

0:17:48.440 --> 0:17:51.919
<v Speaker 2>issues associated with these tests. It sounds like there are

0:17:52.040 --> 0:17:53.560
<v Speaker 2>quite a few of them.

0:17:54.080 --> 0:17:56.960
<v Speaker 3>Oh yeah, I mean so, there are a variety of

0:17:57.000 --> 0:17:59.000
<v Speaker 3>issues that go along with drug test kits, and there's

0:17:59.000 --> 0:18:02.239
<v Speaker 3>so many areas in that chain of sequence, from you know,

0:18:02.359 --> 0:18:05.240
<v Speaker 3>finding the substance to actually testing it that can go wrong.

0:18:05.760 --> 0:18:08.159
<v Speaker 3>And so first and foremost is actually training. And so

0:18:08.880 --> 0:18:11.080
<v Speaker 3>it seems very easy. You drop something in a vial

0:18:11.160 --> 0:18:12.560
<v Speaker 3>and you test it and see if it turns a

0:18:12.560 --> 0:18:14.200
<v Speaker 3>different color, and if it does, then it's supposed to

0:18:14.240 --> 0:18:17.760
<v Speaker 3>be drugs. But it's not that simple, and so officers

0:18:17.760 --> 0:18:20.640
<v Speaker 3>have to be trained accordingly on how these work. And

0:18:21.119 --> 0:18:23.840
<v Speaker 3>the problem is a lot of different substances actually change

0:18:23.840 --> 0:18:25.719
<v Speaker 3>the color. And so the way that the thought process

0:18:25.720 --> 0:18:27.520
<v Speaker 3>is supposed to go about this is if it's not

0:18:27.560 --> 0:18:30.440
<v Speaker 3>a drug, the substance shouldn't change in there. However, a

0:18:30.480 --> 0:18:33.399
<v Speaker 3>lot of substances actually make that color go different, and

0:18:33.440 --> 0:18:36.520
<v Speaker 3>so you have these situations where officers aren't properly trained

0:18:36.560 --> 0:18:38.760
<v Speaker 3>on how to use them, they break the different vials

0:18:38.760 --> 0:18:41.600
<v Speaker 3>in the wrong way. It could be cold outside, the

0:18:41.640 --> 0:18:46.800
<v Speaker 3>temperature changes different things, the chemicals might be expired within them.

0:18:46.960 --> 0:18:48.680
<v Speaker 3>There's a lot of different ways that this can go wrong.

0:18:48.760 --> 0:18:51.480
<v Speaker 3>But even if you do everything correctly, everything right. The

0:18:51.520 --> 0:18:54.080
<v Speaker 3>officer has been properly trained, and he's one of the

0:18:54.080 --> 0:18:56.639
<v Speaker 3>best you know at actually utilizing this. He was a

0:18:56.680 --> 0:18:59.719
<v Speaker 3>former chemist, let's just say, the most you know crazy

0:18:59.720 --> 0:19:02.160
<v Speaker 3>since area where he knew exactly how to do this.

0:19:02.520 --> 0:19:06.320
<v Speaker 3>There are so many different non controlled substances that actually

0:19:06.400 --> 0:19:09.080
<v Speaker 3>test positive for drugs and change that substance that look

0:19:09.119 --> 0:19:12.040
<v Speaker 3>like narcotics that it makes it impossible to really verify

0:19:12.119 --> 0:19:13.199
<v Speaker 3>if this is a drug or not.

0:19:13.880 --> 0:19:16.399
<v Speaker 2>And let's be honest, most of these officers are not

0:19:16.640 --> 0:19:21.800
<v Speaker 2>scientists or chemists. And there are many other problems, including

0:19:21.800 --> 0:19:25.320
<v Speaker 2>that these tests just aren't that easy to read. One

0:19:25.400 --> 0:19:28.720
<v Speaker 2>color can easily be interpreted as another. So what are

0:19:28.720 --> 0:19:29.720
<v Speaker 2>some examples of this?

0:19:30.840 --> 0:19:33.960
<v Speaker 3>For example, one test, it says that LSD should turn

0:19:34.000 --> 0:19:37.000
<v Speaker 3>all of black, but sugar turns dark brown. Now, if

0:19:37.040 --> 0:19:39.960
<v Speaker 3>you're on the side of the road pulling someone over

0:19:40.080 --> 0:19:44.120
<v Speaker 3>at night, there's lights flashing, things are going on, it's noisy,

0:19:44.280 --> 0:19:47.400
<v Speaker 3>it's hot. You're in South Texas, You're shaking this thing

0:19:47.440 --> 0:19:49.680
<v Speaker 3>around and you're looking at it and you're saying, is

0:19:49.720 --> 0:19:52.199
<v Speaker 3>that dark brown or is that all of black? I mean,

0:19:52.640 --> 0:19:55.480
<v Speaker 3>it's a pretty ridiculous question, but this can mean the

0:19:55.520 --> 0:20:00.639
<v Speaker 3>difference between someone being arrested or being let go because

0:20:00.640 --> 0:20:03.720
<v Speaker 3>of this slight color change. And then another test, another

0:20:03.840 --> 0:20:06.520
<v Speaker 3>very popular test, cocaine is supposed to be a deep

0:20:06.560 --> 0:20:10.680
<v Speaker 3>orange yellow, while salt is a strong orange. If you

0:20:10.680 --> 0:20:12.679
<v Speaker 3>can explain to me what a strong orange is compared

0:20:12.720 --> 0:20:15.639
<v Speaker 3>to a deep orange yellow, please let me know.

0:20:26.560 --> 0:20:29.840
<v Speaker 2>So I'm thinking of someone like Amy, who we talked

0:20:29.840 --> 0:20:33.399
<v Speaker 2>about at the beginning of this episode and whose story

0:20:33.520 --> 0:20:36.800
<v Speaker 2>was actually published in an article by Pro Publica. And

0:20:36.840 --> 0:20:39.080
<v Speaker 2>by the way, if you're interested, you can find this

0:20:39.240 --> 0:20:42.600
<v Speaker 2>article and others about these roadside drug tests in our

0:20:42.680 --> 0:20:47.119
<v Speaker 2>show notes. But someone like Amy is taking to jail

0:20:47.240 --> 0:20:52.680
<v Speaker 2>based on this flawed roadside test, and she's told by

0:20:52.720 --> 0:20:56.399
<v Speaker 2>her court appointed defense attorney that there's another test that

0:20:56.440 --> 0:20:59.600
<v Speaker 2>can verify the results. Of course, that test is going

0:20:59.640 --> 0:21:03.159
<v Speaker 2>to take quite some time, but she's told that nonetheless,

0:21:03.200 --> 0:21:05.960
<v Speaker 2>So tell us about that second test, the lab test.

0:21:06.680 --> 0:21:10.200
<v Speaker 2>Is it actually reliable And if it is reliable, why

0:21:10.240 --> 0:21:13.240
<v Speaker 2>aren't they using it to verify the results right away

0:21:13.320 --> 0:21:16.720
<v Speaker 2>instead of having, you know, people like Amy be presented

0:21:16.760 --> 0:21:21.679
<v Speaker 2>with this very precarious circumstance in which they're made to

0:21:21.720 --> 0:21:23.280
<v Speaker 2>wait around for a.

0:21:23.280 --> 0:21:26.879
<v Speaker 3>While with all these drug test kits, you know, and

0:21:26.920 --> 0:21:29.440
<v Speaker 3>it says it right on the box, they should be

0:21:29.600 --> 0:21:34.040
<v Speaker 3>verified by a forensics lab. And so most jurisdictions either

0:21:34.080 --> 0:21:37.240
<v Speaker 3>have a state lab and then also for a larger cities,

0:21:37.240 --> 0:21:39.760
<v Speaker 3>they'll have their own lab. So essentially what they do

0:21:40.000 --> 0:21:42.440
<v Speaker 3>is take the substance, heat it up a lot, break

0:21:42.520 --> 0:21:44.160
<v Speaker 3>it down to its elements, and then you can tell

0:21:44.160 --> 0:21:46.920
<v Speaker 3>from that with you know, pretty much one hundredercent certainty

0:21:46.960 --> 0:21:49.720
<v Speaker 3>that what it is is either narcotics or not. However,

0:21:50.080 --> 0:21:52.280
<v Speaker 3>most of the time it's not getting to that point.

0:21:52.640 --> 0:21:55.680
<v Speaker 3>A lot of places, you know in Texas Department Public

0:21:55.720 --> 0:21:58.520
<v Speaker 3>and Safety there just doesn't have the time and bandwidth

0:21:58.560 --> 0:22:01.639
<v Speaker 3>to actually verify a lot of the these cases. Some jurisdiction,

0:22:01.720 --> 0:22:04.480
<v Speaker 3>now Houston, after this story kind of broke, is now

0:22:04.520 --> 0:22:08.000
<v Speaker 3>not allowing for plea deals to be accepted without that verification.

0:22:08.080 --> 0:22:10.520
<v Speaker 3>But a lot of jurisdictions, preticuting small jurisdictions, we have

0:22:10.600 --> 0:22:13.440
<v Speaker 3>these major backlaws. People are playing within a couple of days,

0:22:13.480 --> 0:22:16.600
<v Speaker 3>and then these things aren't being verified. Back every case

0:22:16.640 --> 0:22:19.680
<v Speaker 3>can't get tested. With the amount and volume that we have.

0:22:19.880 --> 0:22:22.600
<v Speaker 3>There's one point six million arrests for drug offenses each

0:22:22.680 --> 0:22:25.119
<v Speaker 3>and every year, and if you try to verify and

0:22:25.200 --> 0:22:27.399
<v Speaker 3>test all these substances, you never get through it. And

0:22:27.480 --> 0:22:30.159
<v Speaker 3>so those are the problems. So the actual test, the

0:22:30.200 --> 0:22:33.960
<v Speaker 3>actual science that should be used here is not being

0:22:34.040 --> 0:22:37.879
<v Speaker 3>utilized because the criminal process stops within a couple of

0:22:37.920 --> 0:22:40.280
<v Speaker 3>days for most of these individuals, and then the plea happens.

0:22:40.960 --> 0:22:43.720
<v Speaker 2>So let's pause there for a second. Tell us about

0:22:43.760 --> 0:22:47.120
<v Speaker 2>the plea. Why does so many innocent people end up

0:22:47.240 --> 0:22:51.440
<v Speaker 2>pleading guilty once they're charged based on these faulty roadside

0:22:51.520 --> 0:22:52.320
<v Speaker 2>drug tests.

0:22:53.119 --> 0:22:55.959
<v Speaker 3>So plea deal is a negotiation, and so what it

0:22:56.040 --> 0:22:58.880
<v Speaker 3>is is, hey, I can give you ten years on this,

0:22:59.000 --> 0:23:01.679
<v Speaker 3>or you can take two instead of going to trial,

0:23:01.840 --> 0:23:04.760
<v Speaker 3>let's settle this today. And so that is very attractive

0:23:04.800 --> 0:23:06.840
<v Speaker 3>for a lot of people that are facing so much time,

0:23:07.119 --> 0:23:09.000
<v Speaker 3>and it really does get to a point where it's

0:23:09.119 --> 0:23:13.160
<v Speaker 3>quite coercive. Maybe they set your bail at five thousand dollars,

0:23:13.200 --> 0:23:15.120
<v Speaker 3>ten thousand dollars, you can't afford it, so you sit

0:23:15.200 --> 0:23:18.199
<v Speaker 3>in jail, and you're claiming your innocence. You're claiming your innocence.

0:23:18.240 --> 0:23:21.080
<v Speaker 3>Now the prosecute delays your case again, delays your case again.

0:23:21.359 --> 0:23:23.080
<v Speaker 3>We'll accept a forty five day deal, or we can

0:23:23.119 --> 0:23:24.760
<v Speaker 3>go to trial and maybe you'll get two years. And

0:23:24.800 --> 0:23:27.720
<v Speaker 3>you have an overworked public defender who has a huge

0:23:27.760 --> 0:23:29.800
<v Speaker 3>backlog of cases on their own and can't give you

0:23:29.840 --> 0:23:31.960
<v Speaker 3>the time of day because you can't afford your own attorney,

0:23:32.280 --> 0:23:34.080
<v Speaker 3>and so they're telling you take the plea, you have

0:23:34.160 --> 0:23:37.040
<v Speaker 3>no chance go through this, and you're still sitting in jail,

0:23:37.080 --> 0:23:39.119
<v Speaker 3>and sitting in jail, and jail's not a great place,

0:23:39.200 --> 0:23:42.080
<v Speaker 3>and jail it's hot or it's freezing cold, and you're

0:23:42.119 --> 0:23:45.320
<v Speaker 3>with other people that are actually, you know, dangerous criminals

0:23:45.480 --> 0:23:47.520
<v Speaker 3>in this place, and you're going through it, and you

0:23:47.560 --> 0:23:50.399
<v Speaker 3>start to think of this cost benefit analysis of do

0:23:50.520 --> 0:23:52.359
<v Speaker 3>I stay in here, take this and go, or do

0:23:52.440 --> 0:23:55.000
<v Speaker 3>I continue to fight this case of potentially risk You know,

0:23:55.080 --> 0:23:58.040
<v Speaker 3>multiple years are staying in here for another six to

0:23:58.119 --> 0:24:00.359
<v Speaker 3>eight months. You know the public defenders selling you the

0:24:00.440 --> 0:24:03.399
<v Speaker 3>backlog at that lab is twelve to eighteen months. You

0:24:03.400 --> 0:24:05.600
<v Speaker 3>know you can't get out for quite a while. You

0:24:05.600 --> 0:24:07.399
<v Speaker 3>know these are the types of fears and risk and

0:24:07.440 --> 0:24:10.240
<v Speaker 3>things people are going through in this process. And so

0:24:10.280 --> 0:24:12.879
<v Speaker 3>that's why folks like Amy and thousands of others across

0:24:12.920 --> 0:24:16.800
<v Speaker 3>the country have accepted plead deals even when they're actually innocent.

0:24:17.880 --> 0:24:21.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and what's really tragic is that once these innocent

0:24:21.880 --> 0:24:25.840
<v Speaker 2>people plead guilty, whatever was used to convict them, you know,

0:24:25.920 --> 0:24:29.679
<v Speaker 2>whatever was taken from their car and dropped in one

0:24:29.720 --> 0:24:33.560
<v Speaker 2>of these biles that the police are saying tested positive

0:24:33.600 --> 0:24:37.679
<v Speaker 2>for a certain drug usually gets destroyed. So if they

0:24:37.720 --> 0:24:39.679
<v Speaker 2>ever want to get a hold of the evidence to

0:24:39.760 --> 0:24:42.720
<v Speaker 2>try to demonstrate that they actually pled guilty to something

0:24:42.760 --> 0:24:44.159
<v Speaker 2>they didn't do, they can't get it.

0:24:45.160 --> 0:24:47.200
<v Speaker 3>You're exactly right, you know, evidence in a lot of

0:24:47.240 --> 0:24:50.200
<v Speaker 3>these cases has been destroyed, and so we really don't

0:24:50.240 --> 0:24:52.520
<v Speaker 3>know how many people have been wrongfully convicted because you

0:24:52.560 --> 0:24:55.000
<v Speaker 3>may not be able to verify the results. I know

0:24:55.080 --> 0:24:58.159
<v Speaker 3>Pro Publica did a study and they estimated about one

0:24:58.240 --> 0:25:01.560
<v Speaker 3>hundred thousand people a year probably plead guilty based upon

0:25:01.640 --> 0:25:04.080
<v Speaker 3>drug test kits alone. And so even if you have

0:25:04.119 --> 0:25:06.280
<v Speaker 3>a small air rate there, I mean, you're talking about

0:25:06.320 --> 0:25:09.400
<v Speaker 3>thousands of people potentially each year that actually had never

0:25:09.440 --> 0:25:11.600
<v Speaker 3>done anything wrong pleading guilty, and how many of those

0:25:11.640 --> 0:25:14.480
<v Speaker 3>cases do you actually have the destruction of evidence. Luckily,

0:25:14.520 --> 0:25:17.240
<v Speaker 3>for Amy, and it's tough to say Anything's lucky about

0:25:17.240 --> 0:25:20.520
<v Speaker 3>her case was that, you know, in Harris County, you

0:25:20.600 --> 0:25:23.240
<v Speaker 3>had a forensics lab that didn't want to destroy evidence,

0:25:23.240 --> 0:25:26.240
<v Speaker 3>and you also had so much volume that a motion

0:25:26.359 --> 0:25:28.320
<v Speaker 3>to destroy evidence is about at the bottom of the

0:25:28.359 --> 0:25:30.480
<v Speaker 3>barrel for a judge of signed. So that motion was

0:25:30.480 --> 0:25:33.040
<v Speaker 3>never signed in her case. And so six months later

0:25:33.040 --> 0:25:35.000
<v Speaker 3>this was actually tested and it was a food crump.

0:25:35.840 --> 0:25:39.160
<v Speaker 2>So because of what was really an oversight, the evidence

0:25:39.200 --> 0:25:42.600
<v Speaker 2>in her case was never destroyed. So they were able

0:25:42.640 --> 0:25:47.040
<v Speaker 2>to retest the evidence and find out that she's actually innocent,

0:25:47.920 --> 0:25:51.080
<v Speaker 2>and they sent a letter to Amy's house notifying her,

0:25:51.160 --> 0:25:53.840
<v Speaker 2>but it took a long time to actually get that letter,

0:25:54.440 --> 0:25:57.159
<v Speaker 2>so Amy went a long time not knowing that this

0:25:57.280 --> 0:25:59.120
<v Speaker 2>evidence had ever been retested.

0:26:00.359 --> 0:26:02.960
<v Speaker 3>Now, the problem with that, and the problem in Amy's case,

0:26:03.040 --> 0:26:05.280
<v Speaker 3>is that she had moved from her original address at

0:26:05.320 --> 0:26:07.080
<v Speaker 3>that time. And so for a lot of folks, I mean,

0:26:07.119 --> 0:26:10.000
<v Speaker 3>this has been going on for years. They can't find everyone,

0:26:10.040 --> 0:26:12.560
<v Speaker 3>and so these criminal convictions continue to linger. Some of

0:26:12.600 --> 0:26:15.040
<v Speaker 3>these individuals were homeless, Some of these are extreme poverty.

0:26:15.320 --> 0:26:17.800
<v Speaker 3>Some of them moved out far away and don't understand

0:26:17.800 --> 0:26:19.919
<v Speaker 3>that this is going on. And so a lot of

0:26:19.920 --> 0:26:22.320
<v Speaker 3>these cases are still unresolved to this day. And that's

0:26:22.359 --> 0:26:24.399
<v Speaker 3>exactly what happened to Amy's case. I think her initial

0:26:24.440 --> 0:26:27.800
<v Speaker 3>letter was sent in twenty fourteen. It took until you know,

0:26:28.080 --> 0:26:30.440
<v Speaker 3>two reporters from the New York Times to finally get

0:26:30.480 --> 0:26:33.399
<v Speaker 3>in touch with her and finally found her, you know,

0:26:33.520 --> 0:26:35.760
<v Speaker 3>six years later after this happened, she had already had

0:26:35.760 --> 0:26:39.159
<v Speaker 3>the criminal conviction on her record, She had lost everything

0:26:39.160 --> 0:26:41.040
<v Speaker 3>she was working at, like a convenience store, and then

0:26:41.160 --> 0:26:43.240
<v Speaker 3>kind of working for a slumlord after because she couldn't

0:26:43.240 --> 0:26:45.639
<v Speaker 3>get a job with a felony record. And so this

0:26:45.840 --> 0:26:48.920
<v Speaker 3>entire woman's life is ruined based upon the evidence of

0:26:49.000 --> 0:26:49.720
<v Speaker 3>this drug kit.

0:26:50.800 --> 0:26:53.639
<v Speaker 2>Look, I know exactly what you're talking about. I have

0:26:53.760 --> 0:26:56.919
<v Speaker 2>so many clients that when they get out, you know,

0:26:56.960 --> 0:27:02.240
<v Speaker 2>there's always you know, a celebration, and oftentimes it's covered

0:27:02.280 --> 0:27:07.359
<v Speaker 2>in the press. And after that first you know, twenty

0:27:07.400 --> 0:27:12.040
<v Speaker 2>four forty eight seventy two hours, you know, a different

0:27:12.119 --> 0:27:15.879
<v Speaker 2>kind of nightmare begins for them. You know, trying to

0:27:15.920 --> 0:27:21.160
<v Speaker 2>assimilate back into society is just you know, very very difficult.

0:27:21.840 --> 0:27:26.520
<v Speaker 2>The psychological harm that is done, you know, from somebody

0:27:26.560 --> 0:27:30.680
<v Speaker 2>being in a combined space and having to answer to

0:27:30.720 --> 0:27:33.800
<v Speaker 2>someone having to ask permission to do something, you know,

0:27:33.920 --> 0:27:36.240
<v Speaker 2>simple things like go to the bathroom or eat. It's

0:27:36.359 --> 0:27:43.520
<v Speaker 2>just it's hard to undo. And you know, this stain

0:27:43.920 --> 0:27:50.000
<v Speaker 2>of a wrongful incarceration, a wrongful conviction really sticks with you.

0:27:50.000 --> 0:27:52.199
<v Speaker 3>You know the Internet, things don't leave there, and so

0:27:52.359 --> 0:27:54.160
<v Speaker 3>you have this arrest record on that. You have these

0:27:54.200 --> 0:27:57.040
<v Speaker 3>convictions on there, and those linger with you for quite

0:27:57.080 --> 0:27:59.840
<v Speaker 3>a while. It costs thousands of dollars to get your

0:28:00.119 --> 0:28:03.080
<v Speaker 3>six sponge even if you're wrongfully convicted, And even if

0:28:03.080 --> 0:28:06.040
<v Speaker 3>you get that off your physical record, the digital record

0:28:06.160 --> 0:28:08.840
<v Speaker 3>still stays there. You have a mug shot that's out there.

0:28:08.880 --> 0:28:11.439
<v Speaker 3>You have this arrest record, you have the plea. You

0:28:11.480 --> 0:28:13.840
<v Speaker 3>have all these different documents and they can be scrubbed

0:28:13.880 --> 0:28:15.639
<v Speaker 3>from one thing, but they can pop up on another.

0:28:15.960 --> 0:28:19.600
<v Speaker 3>You'll have the same company have something called mugshots dot

0:28:19.640 --> 0:28:22.440
<v Speaker 3>com and then they'll have mugshots with the z dot

0:28:22.480 --> 0:28:23.800
<v Speaker 3>com and then you have to pay to get it

0:28:23.800 --> 0:28:25.879
<v Speaker 3>off of there. And so you know, I'm sure if

0:28:25.920 --> 0:28:28.600
<v Speaker 3>you looked up Amy Albritton and criminal history on a

0:28:28.600 --> 0:28:30.639
<v Speaker 3>lot of these different sites, you probably still see that

0:28:30.680 --> 0:28:33.840
<v Speaker 3>she was arrested, charge and convicted for a drug possession.

0:28:33.960 --> 0:28:35.880
<v Speaker 3>And if you're trying to get a job, you're trying

0:28:35.880 --> 0:28:39.480
<v Speaker 3>to get public funding, public housing, apply to school, all

0:28:39.480 --> 0:28:41.880
<v Speaker 3>these different things that's going to pop up, and sometimes

0:28:41.920 --> 0:28:45.239
<v Speaker 3>an employer or a college or something else will just

0:28:45.600 --> 0:28:47.680
<v Speaker 3>brush past you because that even though you were actually

0:28:47.760 --> 0:28:49.080
<v Speaker 3>exonerated of a crime.

0:28:49.640 --> 0:28:52.680
<v Speaker 2>So if these tests are so problematic, why is law

0:28:52.760 --> 0:28:56.200
<v Speaker 2>enforcement still using them? Why are they so so popular?

0:28:57.320 --> 0:28:59.880
<v Speaker 3>Well, they're incredibly popular. And the reason that they're so

0:29:00.040 --> 0:29:02.280
<v Speaker 3>pppler is because they're cheap and they allow and I'm

0:29:02.320 --> 0:29:05.800
<v Speaker 3>using this term loosely, for officers and proseures to gather

0:29:05.960 --> 0:29:08.720
<v Speaker 3>some sort of chemical evidence early on in the trial

0:29:08.760 --> 0:29:11.760
<v Speaker 3>and keep that churn of the criminal justice system going.

0:29:11.800 --> 0:29:14.160
<v Speaker 3>We had one point six million arrests for drug offenses

0:29:14.200 --> 0:29:17.280
<v Speaker 3>in twenty eighteen. If everyone went to trial on those things,

0:29:17.320 --> 0:29:19.920
<v Speaker 3>you'd never get through. It would take decades to get

0:29:19.960 --> 0:29:22.440
<v Speaker 3>through all the cases. And so what a field drug

0:29:22.440 --> 0:29:25.120
<v Speaker 3>test kit does is allow us to exhibitize the criminal

0:29:25.240 --> 0:29:28.200
<v Speaker 3>justice system and garner police from individuals at the earliest

0:29:28.200 --> 0:29:29.360
<v Speaker 3>stage in the process.

0:29:30.000 --> 0:29:33.440
<v Speaker 2>So do you think there's anything that can prevent these

0:29:33.520 --> 0:29:38.440
<v Speaker 2>roadside drug tests from resulting in innocent people getting convicted.

0:29:39.280 --> 0:29:42.640
<v Speaker 3>Because of investigative stories like we had in Atlanta, there

0:29:42.640 --> 0:29:44.360
<v Speaker 3>was an incredible one down there where they found that

0:29:44.400 --> 0:29:47.800
<v Speaker 3>one hundred and forty five people just in twenty seventeen

0:29:47.840 --> 0:29:51.040
<v Speaker 3>alone were wrongfully convicted of drug possession, and the ones

0:29:51.080 --> 0:29:53.719
<v Speaker 3>in Houston, and we had, you know, certain cases in

0:29:53.960 --> 0:29:57.520
<v Speaker 3>Arizona and Las Vegas. These investigative reports and these types

0:29:57.560 --> 0:30:00.120
<v Speaker 3>of podcasts that you guys are doing has brought more

0:30:00.120 --> 0:30:02.760
<v Speaker 3>information on the inaccuracies of these and actually inherit count.

0:30:02.840 --> 0:30:06.520
<v Speaker 3>They no longer allow for a plea to be entered

0:30:06.600 --> 0:30:09.240
<v Speaker 3>until it has been verified by a laboratory, and so

0:30:10.040 --> 0:30:12.600
<v Speaker 3>you are seeing changes across the country on how these

0:30:12.600 --> 0:30:16.320
<v Speaker 3>are utilized, But still in many jurisdictions, particularly smaller jurisdictions,

0:30:16.680 --> 0:30:20.040
<v Speaker 3>judges are taking these pleas and prosecutors are driving these

0:30:20.080 --> 0:30:22.040
<v Speaker 3>pleas without actually verifying the results.

0:30:22.840 --> 0:30:27.200
<v Speaker 2>These types of stories are extremely valuable, but the sad

0:30:27.280 --> 0:30:30.080
<v Speaker 2>truth is that these kinds of changes take a lot

0:30:30.080 --> 0:30:33.520
<v Speaker 2>of work and a lot of time. So in the meantime,

0:30:34.440 --> 0:30:37.120
<v Speaker 2>for the immediate future, is there anything else that can

0:30:37.160 --> 0:30:40.280
<v Speaker 2>be done to stop these kinds of wrongful convictions.

0:30:41.480 --> 0:30:44.440
<v Speaker 3>If you're about to accept a plea based upon this alone,

0:30:44.640 --> 0:30:48.440
<v Speaker 3>do not. Now, you do have newer technologies today that

0:30:48.520 --> 0:30:51.160
<v Speaker 3>actually are able to be more readily accurate and don't

0:30:51.160 --> 0:30:54.520
<v Speaker 3>produce as many false positives, but those are very expensive

0:30:54.560 --> 0:30:57.480
<v Speaker 3>and a lot of you know, smaller jurisdictions can't afford those,

0:30:57.520 --> 0:30:59.520
<v Speaker 3>and so that's a good thing, but that's going to

0:30:59.560 --> 0:31:01.840
<v Speaker 3>be you know, a long ways out, and so you know,

0:31:02.080 --> 0:31:04.240
<v Speaker 3>these drug test kits are still very prevalent. So this

0:31:04.440 --> 0:31:06.600
<v Speaker 3>just should not be used in the first place.

0:31:10.000 --> 0:31:13.160
<v Speaker 2>It's likely that stories like Amy's would have remained cloaked

0:31:13.200 --> 0:31:16.240
<v Speaker 2>in silence had it not been for journalists from Pro

0:31:16.280 --> 0:31:20.040
<v Speaker 2>Publica and The New York Times who did extensive reporting

0:31:20.080 --> 0:31:23.600
<v Speaker 2>to understand the depth of the problems that are associated

0:31:23.680 --> 0:31:28.240
<v Speaker 2>with roadside drug test kits. In fact, Amy likely wouldn't

0:31:28.240 --> 0:31:30.880
<v Speaker 2>have learned about the retesting of the evidence in her case,

0:31:31.160 --> 0:31:34.120
<v Speaker 2>which verified what she already knew that she was innocent,

0:31:34.680 --> 0:31:38.840
<v Speaker 2>if these reporters hadn't tracked her down. It's because of

0:31:38.880 --> 0:31:43.400
<v Speaker 2>these investigative journalists that the problems associated with drug test

0:31:43.480 --> 0:31:46.560
<v Speaker 2>kits came to light, and it's in a large part

0:31:46.640 --> 0:31:51.120
<v Speaker 2>due to their reporting that local municipalities across the country

0:31:51.400 --> 0:31:55.880
<v Speaker 2>are being pressured to change their regulations regarding roadside drug tests.

0:31:56.800 --> 0:31:59.840
<v Speaker 2>Oversight is being implemented to ensure that the work of

0:32:00.360 --> 0:32:04.480
<v Speaker 2>labse is reliable. There's increased scrutiny of plea deals for

0:32:04.600 --> 0:32:09.200
<v Speaker 2>drug offenses where there isn't evidence to support a person's guilt.

0:32:10.320 --> 0:32:14.680
<v Speaker 2>This kind of reporting is extraordinarily important for helping the

0:32:14.760 --> 0:32:19.600
<v Speaker 2>Innocence Project and lawyers like me identify cases where individuals

0:32:19.640 --> 0:32:23.000
<v Speaker 2>were wrongfully convicted, and to bring these cases to the

0:32:23.000 --> 0:32:28.000
<v Speaker 2>public's attention. So subscribe to news outlets like Pro Publica,

0:32:28.240 --> 0:32:31.800
<v Speaker 2>the Marshall Project, the New York Times, or wherever you

0:32:31.920 --> 0:32:36.400
<v Speaker 2>see quality journalism that is focused on exposing the shortcomings

0:32:36.440 --> 0:32:40.800
<v Speaker 2>of our criminal justice system. We hear this phrase fake news,

0:32:41.400 --> 0:32:45.959
<v Speaker 2>fake news. It's all fake news carelessly tossed around to

0:32:46.000 --> 0:32:49.200
<v Speaker 2>the point where people are actually beginning to believe that

0:32:49.280 --> 0:32:52.640
<v Speaker 2>they should be dismissive of anything written by a journalists.

0:32:53.320 --> 0:32:56.560
<v Speaker 2>This is so dangerous for reasons that I think are

0:32:56.600 --> 0:33:01.120
<v Speaker 2>obvious to listeners of this show. Dissult on our media

0:33:01.600 --> 0:33:06.280
<v Speaker 2>makes support incredible news organizations more important than Ever, as

0:33:06.320 --> 0:33:10.080
<v Speaker 2>it is often under the microscope of their thorough investigative

0:33:10.120 --> 0:33:15.640
<v Speaker 2>reporting that we uncover and then prevent the junk science

0:33:15.760 --> 0:33:25.760
<v Speaker 2>behind wrongful convictions. Next week, we'll explore the junk science

0:33:25.800 --> 0:33:30.480
<v Speaker 2>of eyewitness identification with the renowned psychologist and memory expert

0:33:30.640 --> 0:33:35.680
<v Speaker 2>Elizabeth Loftis. Wrongful Conviction Junk Science is a production of

0:33:35.760 --> 0:33:39.600
<v Speaker 2>Lava for Good Podcasts and association with Signal Company Number One.

0:33:40.160 --> 0:33:43.080
<v Speaker 2>Thanks to our executive producer Jason Flahm and the team

0:33:43.120 --> 0:33:47.080
<v Speaker 2>at Signal Company Number One executive producer Kevin Wartis and

0:33:47.200 --> 0:33:51.560
<v Speaker 2>senior producers Karen Kornhaber and Brit Spangler. Our music was

0:33:51.600 --> 0:33:55.120
<v Speaker 2>composed by Jay Ralph. You can follow me on Instagram

0:33:55.160 --> 0:33:59.520
<v Speaker 2>at dubin Josh, follow the Wrongful Conviction podcast on Facebook

0:33:59.720 --> 0:34:03.280
<v Speaker 2>and on Instagram at Wrongful Conviction, and on Twitter at

0:34:03.320 --> 0:34:04.120
<v Speaker 2>wrong Conviction