WEBVTT - The Capital Cycle Is Turning

0:00:02.600 --> 0:00:07.520
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, Radio News.

0:00:17.560 --> 0:00:19.799
<v Speaker 2>Welcome to Marin Talks Money, the podcast in which people

0:00:19.800 --> 0:00:22.600
<v Speaker 2>who know the markets explain the market. I am Maren

0:00:22.640 --> 0:00:25.280
<v Speaker 2>Somerset Web and this week I am speaking with Luke Bridgman,

0:00:25.440 --> 0:00:29.080
<v Speaker 2>Senior partner and portfolio manager at Hosking Partners. I invited

0:00:29.200 --> 0:00:33.480
<v Speaker 2>Luke on because they are a very interesting group of investors.

0:00:33.520 --> 0:00:37.760
<v Speaker 2>At Hosking. They invest based on the capital cycle. We're

0:00:37.760 --> 0:00:40.120
<v Speaker 2>going to talk about that, what it means, how it works,

0:00:40.159 --> 0:00:43.080
<v Speaker 2>and at the same time we talk about everything from

0:00:43.120 --> 0:00:45.920
<v Speaker 2>why they're invested in Japan to oil and in particular

0:00:46.000 --> 0:00:49.800
<v Speaker 2>about dram memory and about shipping. Luke, Welcome to Marin

0:00:49.800 --> 0:00:50.400
<v Speaker 2>Talks Money.

0:00:50.680 --> 0:00:51.920
<v Speaker 1>Great to be here. Thank you, Mary.

0:00:52.360 --> 0:00:54.560
<v Speaker 2>Well listen, Luke. I asked you on because I think

0:00:54.600 --> 0:00:57.480
<v Speaker 2>a lot of our listeners are quite interested in capital

0:00:57.560 --> 0:01:00.360
<v Speaker 2>cycle investing. We've written and spoken about it a few

0:01:00.360 --> 0:01:04.320
<v Speaker 2>times in the past, and looking at the massive levels

0:01:04.360 --> 0:01:07.760
<v Speaker 2>of capital spending going on, particularly of course in the

0:01:07.840 --> 0:01:11.160
<v Speaker 2>AI area, it seems like something we probably should begin

0:01:11.400 --> 0:01:14.040
<v Speaker 2>to focus on. So that's the reason that I thought

0:01:14.200 --> 0:01:17.000
<v Speaker 2>I want to talk someone involved in a capital cycle

0:01:17.040 --> 0:01:20.319
<v Speaker 2>style of investing, and you came to mind so I

0:01:20.400 --> 0:01:23.520
<v Speaker 2>wonder if we could just start by me asking you

0:01:23.600 --> 0:01:26.800
<v Speaker 2>what exactly is it that you do at Hoskin and

0:01:26.880 --> 0:01:28.800
<v Speaker 2>how does the investing style work?

0:01:29.080 --> 0:01:32.400
<v Speaker 1>Great? Thanks Marin. What we do at Hosking is is

0:01:33.040 --> 0:01:36.119
<v Speaker 1>very simple. We have a single strategy and that's global equities.

0:01:36.640 --> 0:01:39.399
<v Speaker 1>We do that with a team of five portfolio managers,

0:01:40.040 --> 0:01:43.039
<v Speaker 1>and we are slightly different from other firms in that

0:01:43.280 --> 0:01:48.360
<v Speaker 1>we are all global generalists investing across the whole world

0:01:48.360 --> 0:01:52.600
<v Speaker 1>without specialization, using this capital cycle approach, and we do

0:01:52.680 --> 0:01:55.840
<v Speaker 1>this with a very diversified portfolio of about four hundred stocks.

0:01:56.480 --> 0:02:00.000
<v Speaker 2>If that answers the question, it begins to answer the question.

0:02:00.720 --> 0:02:03.280
<v Speaker 2>But the second bit is to explain because we do

0:02:03.440 --> 0:02:07.400
<v Speaker 2>not have a fully expert audience. We have educated amateurs

0:02:07.400 --> 0:02:09.799
<v Speaker 2>at our audience in the main. So now we need

0:02:09.840 --> 0:02:12.120
<v Speaker 2>to explain exactly what it is that you mean by

0:02:12.200 --> 0:02:13.440
<v Speaker 2>capital cycle investing.

0:02:14.000 --> 0:02:16.280
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so the capital cycle is based on the very

0:02:16.320 --> 0:02:21.200
<v Speaker 1>simple paradigm. The high returns tend to attract capital, and

0:02:21.320 --> 0:02:26.680
<v Speaker 1>that capital competes away those returns to the point that

0:02:26.720 --> 0:02:31.920
<v Speaker 1>the returns fall due to obsolescence or bankruptcy or merger.

0:02:32.360 --> 0:02:35.079
<v Speaker 1>And then in the absence of competition, the returns recover

0:02:35.480 --> 0:02:38.880
<v Speaker 1>and the cycle begins again. And that's not rocket science.

0:02:38.960 --> 0:02:42.960
<v Speaker 1>Is very simple. It's a simple observation about business and economics.

0:02:43.800 --> 0:02:46.840
<v Speaker 1>As capital cycle investors, we're really focused on where that

0:02:46.880 --> 0:02:50.080
<v Speaker 1>doesn't work, and that means we're really looking for two

0:02:50.120 --> 0:02:54.480
<v Speaker 1>types of situation. Broadly speaking, we're looking for high return

0:02:54.680 --> 0:02:57.320
<v Speaker 1>companies where capital can't get in. So those are sort

0:02:57.320 --> 0:03:02.200
<v Speaker 1>of Warren bufferty Moti barriers to entry. Situations where there's

0:03:02.200 --> 0:03:05.040
<v Speaker 1>some reason why capital can't come in to compete and

0:03:05.080 --> 0:03:08.000
<v Speaker 1>the returns can be sustained for higher than the market

0:03:08.040 --> 0:03:10.720
<v Speaker 1>recognized in the price. They're able to beat the fade

0:03:10.760 --> 0:03:14.720
<v Speaker 1>and show persistence. And then we're also interested in situations

0:03:14.760 --> 0:03:18.399
<v Speaker 1>where returns have been beaten up and capital has been withdrawn,

0:03:19.120 --> 0:03:21.360
<v Speaker 1>and that gives us the confidence to make the bet

0:03:21.400 --> 0:03:23.639
<v Speaker 1>that the returns are going to pick up sooner than

0:03:23.639 --> 0:03:26.200
<v Speaker 1>the market is given credit for. And so the benefit

0:03:26.600 --> 0:03:29.320
<v Speaker 1>of the capital cycle approach is that it's able to

0:03:29.840 --> 0:03:33.960
<v Speaker 1>plot all companies somewhere in this sort of view of

0:03:34.000 --> 0:03:37.440
<v Speaker 1>the world, but it makes it incredibly versatile. That's the

0:03:37.480 --> 0:03:40.800
<v Speaker 1>governing principle, the lens through which we see the world,

0:03:40.800 --> 0:03:44.880
<v Speaker 1>which allows us all to be generalists trying to take

0:03:44.920 --> 0:03:47.040
<v Speaker 1>advantage of this huge opportunity set.

0:03:47.320 --> 0:03:49.960
<v Speaker 2>So in a sense, you're looking at investing through the

0:03:50.040 --> 0:03:52.840
<v Speaker 2>lens of supply rather than through the lens of demand.

0:03:53.200 --> 0:03:54.880
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I was actually on a podcast the other

0:03:54.960 --> 0:03:56.480
<v Speaker 2>day talking to someone about this and saying that one

0:03:56.520 --> 0:03:58.880
<v Speaker 2>of the very first things that I learned when I

0:03:58.920 --> 0:04:02.080
<v Speaker 2>first started as a stop in Tokyo was to look

0:04:02.200 --> 0:04:05.600
<v Speaker 2>in particular at semiconductor stocks and to say, when these

0:04:05.640 --> 0:04:07.920
<v Speaker 2>things look cheap is when you shouldn't be buying them,

0:04:07.960 --> 0:04:10.360
<v Speaker 2>and when they look expensive is when you should be

0:04:10.360 --> 0:04:14.240
<v Speaker 2>buying them, because given the way the capital cycle works,

0:04:14.400 --> 0:04:18.240
<v Speaker 2>you want to be selling them when they are incredibly popular,

0:04:18.360 --> 0:04:20.720
<v Speaker 2>making powers of money and holds more capital that's coming

0:04:20.720 --> 0:04:23.159
<v Speaker 2>into the market, because that's when you know that prices

0:04:23.240 --> 0:04:26.080
<v Speaker 2>will soon fall, whereas on the other end, when they

0:04:26.080 --> 0:04:28.480
<v Speaker 2>look very expensive, they're not. But sorry, yes, when they're

0:04:28.520 --> 0:04:31.280
<v Speaker 2>not making any money, that's when you want to be

0:04:31.520 --> 0:04:33.800
<v Speaker 2>to be buying them, because there's very limited amounts of

0:04:33.800 --> 0:04:34.599
<v Speaker 2>capital in the market.

0:04:34.680 --> 0:04:38.040
<v Speaker 1>Right, Yeah, Yeah, you're completely right. Two points. Yes, it's

0:04:38.080 --> 0:04:40.320
<v Speaker 1>about supplier rather than demand, So we're sort of able

0:04:40.360 --> 0:04:44.159
<v Speaker 1>to observe those things which are observable we can count

0:04:44.320 --> 0:04:47.320
<v Speaker 1>factories being opened, we can look at job hires, we

0:04:47.360 --> 0:04:50.640
<v Speaker 1>can see the reverse in terms of bankruptcies or failures.

0:04:50.760 --> 0:04:52.520
<v Speaker 1>We can see the amount of debt being raised or

0:04:52.520 --> 0:04:55.520
<v Speaker 1>the amount of equity being issued, rather than trying to

0:04:55.560 --> 0:04:57.279
<v Speaker 1>predict how many widgets are going to be sold in

0:04:57.320 --> 0:05:00.120
<v Speaker 1>North America in two years time. But you're also right

0:05:00.160 --> 0:05:05.440
<v Speaker 1>that it's something which is inherently contrarian. And if we

0:05:05.480 --> 0:05:09.839
<v Speaker 1>see high returns as capital cycle investors, our first thought is,

0:05:10.080 --> 0:05:12.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, how likely are those returns to be competed away?

0:05:13.200 --> 0:05:16.360
<v Speaker 1>Where we see poor returns which are hated and neglected

0:05:16.360 --> 0:05:20.080
<v Speaker 1>by everybody else, we ask ourselves, well, could they be wrong?

0:05:20.120 --> 0:05:23.039
<v Speaker 1>And is there an opportunity for returns to recover because

0:05:23.320 --> 0:05:27.159
<v Speaker 1>capital has been withdrawn from this particular sector. So, as investors,

0:05:27.440 --> 0:05:32.200
<v Speaker 1>taking contrariy decisions is emotionally very very difficult, and if

0:05:32.240 --> 0:05:35.720
<v Speaker 1>we have some sort of intellectual or rational tool which

0:05:35.800 --> 0:05:39.480
<v Speaker 1>helps us to make emotionally difficult decisions, then that's got

0:05:39.520 --> 0:05:40.520
<v Speaker 1>to be something in our favor.

0:05:41.000 --> 0:05:43.279
<v Speaker 2>Yes, well, that's why we always say that good fund

0:05:43.360 --> 0:05:46.479
<v Speaker 2>management as much as that character of strategy, don't.

0:05:46.320 --> 0:05:48.080
<v Speaker 1>We Yeah, I think that's very true.

0:05:48.880 --> 0:05:52.680
<v Speaker 2>Right, So let's move that on to talking about did

0:05:52.680 --> 0:05:54.680
<v Speaker 2>you write this piece about the share prices of the

0:05:54.720 --> 0:05:57.480
<v Speaker 2>three companies which dominate the global deram membory thing was

0:05:57.520 --> 0:05:57.800
<v Speaker 2>that you?

0:05:57.920 --> 0:05:59.200
<v Speaker 1>Noh, yeah, I did. I did write that.

0:05:59.440 --> 0:06:00.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, worry about that?

0:06:00.560 --> 0:06:00.680
<v Speaker 1>Well?

0:06:00.880 --> 0:06:03.479
<v Speaker 2>Excellent, of course you wrote it, and it's excellent. This

0:06:03.640 --> 0:06:05.760
<v Speaker 2>is the area when we're talking about the capital cycle.

0:06:05.839 --> 0:06:08.240
<v Speaker 2>We look at companies such as the easy you talk

0:06:08.279 --> 0:06:11.520
<v Speaker 2>about Micron and Skhiinex and Samsung. And obviously there's been

0:06:11.520 --> 0:06:13.640
<v Speaker 2>a lot going on in career over the last couple

0:06:13.680 --> 0:06:15.839
<v Speaker 2>of weeks while I've been on holiday, so the cost

0:06:15.839 --> 0:06:17.760
<v Speaker 2>bit is now down from its peakback in June, right,

0:06:17.800 --> 0:06:20.960
<v Speaker 2>and some of these big, big companies have had rather

0:06:21.080 --> 0:06:26.000
<v Speaker 2>nasty negative momentum moves recently. But nonetheless, the conversation is

0:06:26.040 --> 0:06:30.640
<v Speaker 2>about the extent to which these companies that currently dominate

0:06:30.680 --> 0:06:33.680
<v Speaker 2>the memory market will be subject to an old fashioned

0:06:33.720 --> 0:06:34.440
<v Speaker 2>capital cycle.

0:06:34.800 --> 0:06:37.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. It's a fascinating subject because we've been investing in

0:06:38.240 --> 0:06:42.120
<v Speaker 1>the memory semis, by which I mean the manufacturers of

0:06:42.200 --> 0:06:44.880
<v Speaker 1>DRAM in particular, and those are the two Korean companies

0:06:44.880 --> 0:06:48.239
<v Speaker 1>Samsung and sk Heinex, as well as Micron in the US.

0:06:48.480 --> 0:06:51.680
<v Speaker 1>But we've been investing in them since inception, which for

0:06:51.839 --> 0:06:55.239
<v Speaker 1>us is twenty fourteen. It's a really interesting sector because

0:06:55.279 --> 0:06:57.120
<v Speaker 1>to understand that, you really need to go back to

0:06:57.200 --> 0:07:01.520
<v Speaker 1>the discovery of DRAM, which was by In funnily enough

0:07:01.560 --> 0:07:05.480
<v Speaker 1>in nineteen seventy and despite being the pioneer in this industry,

0:07:05.600 --> 0:07:09.440
<v Speaker 1>it actually exited fifteen years later in nineteen eighty five

0:07:09.880 --> 0:07:13.119
<v Speaker 1>to focus on logic chips, where it saw itself having

0:07:13.400 --> 0:07:16.960
<v Speaker 1>a greater advantage. And the reason why it exited DRAM

0:07:17.040 --> 0:07:19.280
<v Speaker 1>despite having been the pioneer is that it just saw

0:07:19.720 --> 0:07:24.240
<v Speaker 1>more and more competition coming into this highly commoditized market

0:07:24.320 --> 0:07:28.120
<v Speaker 1>for memoryships, which were all interchangeable and which we're suffering

0:07:28.160 --> 0:07:33.080
<v Speaker 1>from excess investment. There was a constant progress in what's

0:07:33.080 --> 0:07:36.120
<v Speaker 1>called Moore's law. The number of transistors you can get

0:07:36.160 --> 0:07:39.880
<v Speaker 1>onto a chip shrinks at a fairly regular pace every

0:07:39.920 --> 0:07:44.160
<v Speaker 1>two years, broadly speaking, and so the constant need keep

0:07:44.200 --> 0:07:47.800
<v Speaker 1>investing with the latest technology before you'd even really made

0:07:47.800 --> 0:07:50.880
<v Speaker 1>a return on the previous investment cycle. And this led

0:07:51.040 --> 0:07:55.320
<v Speaker 1>what had been thirty DRAM companies around nineteen eighty five

0:07:55.680 --> 0:08:00.560
<v Speaker 1>when Intel exited, to fall to just three years later

0:08:00.640 --> 0:08:04.600
<v Speaker 1>in twenty twenty thirteen, twenty fourteen s and that was

0:08:04.640 --> 0:08:07.080
<v Speaker 1>because they couldn't keep up with that pace of investment,

0:08:07.160 --> 0:08:10.120
<v Speaker 1>and so the lack of a return on capital meant

0:08:10.160 --> 0:08:14.280
<v Speaker 1>that they were either forced into bankruptcy or gobbled up

0:08:14.320 --> 0:08:16.760
<v Speaker 1>by other d round companies until there were just three left.

0:08:17.200 --> 0:08:21.000
<v Speaker 1>And then what happened at that point was the physics

0:08:21.040 --> 0:08:24.440
<v Speaker 1>really reached its natural limit and it became more and

0:08:24.520 --> 0:08:28.760
<v Speaker 1>more difficult to shrink the number of transistors on these chips,

0:08:29.200 --> 0:08:32.319
<v Speaker 1>and that gave the three surviving companies the breathing space

0:08:32.400 --> 0:08:37.840
<v Speaker 1>to slow down. And the capex was still very high,

0:08:37.920 --> 0:08:41.240
<v Speaker 1>which was a significant barrier to entry, preventing other companies

0:08:41.240 --> 0:08:43.480
<v Speaker 1>really from coming in. And we can come onto the

0:08:43.559 --> 0:08:44.719
<v Speaker 1>Chinese companies.

0:08:44.400 --> 0:08:46.079
<v Speaker 2>Later, Oh yes, that's the plan.

0:08:47.240 --> 0:08:50.280
<v Speaker 1>But in the meantime it allowed them to generate a

0:08:50.320 --> 0:08:53.800
<v Speaker 1>return on capital rather a return of capital. And so

0:08:54.440 --> 0:08:59.400
<v Speaker 1>the chip industry is still cyclical. It's based on and

0:08:59.720 --> 0:09:03.440
<v Speaker 1>mark cycles, and chip companies need to run their kit

0:09:03.520 --> 0:09:05.640
<v Speaker 1>at a full capacity, so you get a mismatch between

0:09:05.640 --> 0:09:08.800
<v Speaker 1>supply and demand. But that's just a normal inventory cycle.

0:09:09.480 --> 0:09:12.560
<v Speaker 1>But because the market had consolidated because no new capital

0:09:12.600 --> 0:09:15.840
<v Speaker 1>was coming in from outside, what we found was that

0:09:15.920 --> 0:09:20.080
<v Speaker 1>through each cycle, the reternal capitul in each got higher

0:09:20.240 --> 0:09:22.560
<v Speaker 1>and in each low as well, which was a fairly

0:09:22.559 --> 0:09:26.960
<v Speaker 1>attractive phenomenon. So as long term investors, we were able

0:09:27.040 --> 0:09:29.920
<v Speaker 1>to trim at the peaks and add at the bottoms,

0:09:30.280 --> 0:09:35.360
<v Speaker 1>which we did fairly successfully up until twenty twenty two

0:09:35.559 --> 0:09:39.400
<v Speaker 1>in November when chatchpt first launched itself on the world,

0:09:39.960 --> 0:09:44.200
<v Speaker 1>and we saw the beginning of a huge demand cycle

0:09:44.320 --> 0:09:47.679
<v Speaker 1>which we're still in and that has turned these companies

0:09:47.720 --> 0:09:50.080
<v Speaker 1>into trillion dollar companies. I'm not sure where they are

0:09:50.160 --> 0:09:54.240
<v Speaker 1>to dating. The share prices are moving very violently because

0:09:54.240 --> 0:09:57.600
<v Speaker 1>of all of the retail participation and momentum in the market,

0:09:57.920 --> 0:10:00.880
<v Speaker 1>and so that's really put our previous approach to the test.

0:10:01.280 --> 0:10:04.000
<v Speaker 1>And what we're trying to do is actually keep doing

0:10:04.000 --> 0:10:06.440
<v Speaker 1>what we have been doing, which is trim as the

0:10:06.480 --> 0:10:10.120
<v Speaker 1>prices get higher and higher while retaining exposure, so that

0:10:10.160 --> 0:10:12.520
<v Speaker 1>we probably will be adding at some point in the

0:10:12.520 --> 0:10:15.600
<v Speaker 1>future if prices fall dramatically further from where they are.

0:10:16.000 --> 0:10:19.240
<v Speaker 2>So when you say that that it challenged your previous approach,

0:10:19.280 --> 0:10:21.040
<v Speaker 2>I mean you still refer to this as a cycle.

0:10:21.360 --> 0:10:25.600
<v Speaker 2>This is not a permanent increase in demand constantly. Are

0:10:25.640 --> 0:10:27.719
<v Speaker 2>still a cycle. It's just a matter of figuring out

0:10:27.760 --> 0:10:29.600
<v Speaker 2>what sort of cycle it is and how long a

0:10:29.679 --> 0:10:30.320
<v Speaker 2>cycle it is.

0:10:31.360 --> 0:10:33.839
<v Speaker 1>And there are wheels within wheels here, there's this sort

0:10:33.840 --> 0:10:37.040
<v Speaker 1>of capital cycle life to've been describing their inventory cycles.

0:10:37.080 --> 0:10:40.560
<v Speaker 1>There are product cycles, they're economic cycles. But we've got

0:10:40.600 --> 0:10:42.480
<v Speaker 1>to try and keep an eye on the bigger picture

0:10:42.520 --> 0:10:44.640
<v Speaker 1>in terms of the capital cycle. And I think the

0:10:44.640 --> 0:10:47.640
<v Speaker 1>thesis remains intact that there are still just three d

0:10:47.760 --> 0:10:51.000
<v Speaker 1>RAM companies, but we've got to recognize that there is

0:10:51.240 --> 0:10:54.960
<v Speaker 1>exuberance in prices. There is the threat that the Chinese

0:10:55.280 --> 0:10:58.400
<v Speaker 1>will catch up, and there is the risk that other

0:10:58.440 --> 0:11:02.640
<v Speaker 1>ship companies may try to come into the memory market. Yeap.

0:11:03.040 --> 0:11:05.400
<v Speaker 1>Where we take some comfort for the time being is

0:11:05.480 --> 0:11:09.520
<v Speaker 1>just the huge amount of capital and know how required

0:11:09.600 --> 0:11:12.960
<v Speaker 1>to compete with these companies. And even if they themselves

0:11:12.960 --> 0:11:15.760
<v Speaker 1>are going to lose discipline in terms of capex, and

0:11:15.800 --> 0:11:19.440
<v Speaker 1>we're fairly confident that they are aware of their own

0:11:19.520 --> 0:11:21.960
<v Speaker 1>sins in the past and determined not to repeat the

0:11:21.960 --> 0:11:24.959
<v Speaker 1>same mistakes. Never say never, But nevertheless, the amount of

0:11:25.000 --> 0:11:27.640
<v Speaker 1>time required to bring on new capacity is long in

0:11:27.760 --> 0:11:31.120
<v Speaker 1>terms of building these new fabs and equipping them and

0:11:31.160 --> 0:11:33.520
<v Speaker 1>getting them going, and so on, so we've got some

0:11:33.679 --> 0:11:34.400
<v Speaker 1>time yet.

0:11:35.040 --> 0:11:39.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so you're not too worried about the Chinese competition

0:11:39.400 --> 0:11:40.000
<v Speaker 2>coming through.

0:11:40.679 --> 0:11:43.320
<v Speaker 1>I think at the moment the view is that as

0:11:43.400 --> 0:11:47.560
<v Speaker 1>the Chinese advance, so too will the incumbents, and so

0:11:47.720 --> 0:11:50.600
<v Speaker 1>catching up will always be difficult, and there's much less

0:11:50.679 --> 0:11:55.280
<v Speaker 1>value in the previous generation of chips than the leading edge.

0:11:55.559 --> 0:11:58.040
<v Speaker 1>But I think you'd be foolish to assume that the

0:11:58.120 --> 0:12:01.439
<v Speaker 1>Chinese aren't capable of eventually catching up. So it may

0:12:01.480 --> 0:12:02.880
<v Speaker 1>simply be a question of time.

0:12:03.200 --> 0:12:06.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, only say the end that, of course, superprofits will

0:12:06.679 --> 0:12:10.440
<v Speaker 2>eventually bring on new supply, because they always do, with

0:12:10.520 --> 0:12:13.640
<v Speaker 2>inevitable consequences for returns and ultimately for share prices.

0:12:13.679 --> 0:12:17.120
<v Speaker 1>But that's a way of Yeah. I mean it's interesting

0:12:17.160 --> 0:12:20.760
<v Speaker 1>speaking to the companies themselves. They are so conscious of

0:12:20.840 --> 0:12:23.840
<v Speaker 1>having screwed up previous cycles. They are now entering into

0:12:24.320 --> 0:12:27.599
<v Speaker 1>so called long term supply agreements with their customers to

0:12:27.640 --> 0:12:30.520
<v Speaker 1>try and keep everyone on the same page and make

0:12:30.559 --> 0:12:34.720
<v Speaker 1>sure that supply matches demand. But very difficult to do them.

0:12:35.120 --> 0:12:37.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, because you have that vague feeling, don't you, that

0:12:37.280 --> 0:12:39.240
<v Speaker 2>there may be an earnings bubble in here, and you

0:12:39.280 --> 0:12:41.160
<v Speaker 2>look at the valuations going back to what we were

0:12:41.160 --> 0:12:43.760
<v Speaker 2>talking about at the beginning, is that historically, when a

0:12:43.800 --> 0:12:46.640
<v Speaker 2>company like this is look cheap, regardless of the fact

0:12:46.679 --> 0:12:49.079
<v Speaker 2>that it's had an extraordinary share price run, you look

0:12:49.120 --> 0:12:50.960
<v Speaker 2>at the p and you go, oh, four times six times,

0:12:50.960 --> 0:12:53.240
<v Speaker 2>that looks very cheap. But I think historically that has

0:12:53.240 --> 0:12:54.040
<v Speaker 2>been the time to sell.

0:12:54.679 --> 0:12:58.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean, mid single digit pe looks very cheap.

0:12:58.200 --> 0:13:01.880
<v Speaker 1>But on the other hand, much higher price to book

0:13:01.960 --> 0:13:04.400
<v Speaker 1>multiples than we're used to. I mean, previously priced to

0:13:04.400 --> 0:13:07.199
<v Speaker 1>book multiples peaked in this industry at about three times,

0:13:07.760 --> 0:13:10.320
<v Speaker 1>and they are six, seven, eight times at the moment.

0:13:10.880 --> 0:13:13.960
<v Speaker 1>And if you can put capital to work and the

0:13:14.000 --> 0:13:17.520
<v Speaker 1>stock market's going to give a value to that capital

0:13:18.040 --> 0:13:20.560
<v Speaker 1>six times what you just put in, then that's a

0:13:20.559 --> 0:13:22.080
<v Speaker 1>great incentive to overinvest.

0:13:22.559 --> 0:13:25.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Okay, well we'll watch that one and we'll keep

0:13:25.920 --> 0:13:29.800
<v Speaker 2>feeling sorry or worrying about the Korean retail investors. I've

0:13:30.160 --> 0:13:31.599
<v Speaker 2>been on holiday and one of the things that have

0:13:31.640 --> 0:13:33.280
<v Speaker 2>stood out to me on my return has be this

0:13:33.440 --> 0:13:36.400
<v Speaker 2>number that three percent of adults in career received a

0:13:36.400 --> 0:13:38.880
<v Speaker 2>margin call. It seemed extremely worrying.

0:13:39.400 --> 0:13:43.319
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean, that's human dimension to that, which is horrifying,

0:13:43.400 --> 0:13:45.880
<v Speaker 1>But clearly there's a huge amount of exuberance in the

0:13:45.880 --> 0:13:47.920
<v Speaker 1>market at the moment, and that's partly a phenomenon of

0:13:49.520 --> 0:13:52.679
<v Speaker 1>momentum and indexation and all those phenomena we're.

0:13:52.480 --> 0:14:07.960
<v Speaker 2>Familiar with and reminded that diversification is super useful. Right,

0:14:08.240 --> 0:14:10.640
<v Speaker 2>What else is interesting at the moment for you? I mean,

0:14:10.679 --> 0:14:13.120
<v Speaker 2>I see looking at the fund fact cheap for the

0:14:13.160 --> 0:14:17.960
<v Speaker 2>hosting Global Equity Fund that Japan is still the top exposure.

0:14:18.360 --> 0:14:22.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean, that's really one of the themes in

0:14:22.440 --> 0:14:25.800
<v Speaker 1>the portfolio. Trying to interpret the four hundred stocks in

0:14:25.840 --> 0:14:29.160
<v Speaker 1>our portfolio and grouping them into themes, and Japan is

0:14:29.200 --> 0:14:31.560
<v Speaker 1>one of those. But there are different ways to slice

0:14:31.880 --> 0:14:35.640
<v Speaker 1>to slice the portfolio. We've been overway Japan for about

0:14:35.640 --> 0:14:38.640
<v Speaker 1>four years, and like I'm sure many of your other guests,

0:14:38.880 --> 0:14:42.000
<v Speaker 1>Japan has gone from all the purpose of corporate Japan

0:14:42.040 --> 0:14:44.920
<v Speaker 1>has gone from providing full employment to the Japanese working

0:14:44.960 --> 0:14:48.960
<v Speaker 1>population to providing returns on capital for the retired Japanese

0:14:49.040 --> 0:14:53.480
<v Speaker 1>population as the demographics have aged and valuations have been

0:14:53.560 --> 0:14:56.240
<v Speaker 1>very cheap, and there's been a massive tailwind from the

0:14:56.240 --> 0:15:02.560
<v Speaker 1>combination of activism by overseason vesters and domestic institutions wanting

0:15:02.720 --> 0:15:07.600
<v Speaker 1>to improve return on equity by Japanese corporates. So we've

0:15:07.680 --> 0:15:10.320
<v Speaker 1>really been taking advantage of that, and I think that continues.

0:15:10.760 --> 0:15:12.840
<v Speaker 1>And the interesting question is which other countries are going

0:15:12.840 --> 0:15:15.560
<v Speaker 1>to be next, whether it's career. Malaysia has a value

0:15:15.640 --> 0:15:16.680
<v Speaker 1>up program as well.

0:15:17.000 --> 0:15:19.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, well Career has a program now very similar to

0:15:19.640 --> 0:15:22.880
<v Speaker 2>the Japanese one, pretty much copied, right, so you may

0:15:22.960 --> 0:15:24.920
<v Speaker 2>begin to see things broaden out in career.

0:15:25.320 --> 0:15:27.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And I mean an interesting thing in career is

0:15:28.200 --> 0:15:30.560
<v Speaker 1>coming back to the memory semis. They've been making so

0:15:30.760 --> 0:15:36.920
<v Speaker 1>much money that their unions have successfully negotiated profit participation

0:15:37.120 --> 0:15:40.880
<v Speaker 1>in the pay of their employees. And these super profits

0:15:40.920 --> 0:15:43.960
<v Speaker 1>are going to result in I think a huge amount

0:15:44.000 --> 0:15:48.760
<v Speaker 1>of wealth filtering down into the Korean population, which should have,

0:15:49.080 --> 0:15:51.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, pretty strong ripple effects on the rest of

0:15:51.000 --> 0:15:51.960
<v Speaker 1>the Korean stock market.

0:15:52.440 --> 0:15:54.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, which would be interesting. Let's go back to Japan then,

0:15:55.080 --> 0:15:58.840
<v Speaker 2>and what sectors have you got exposure to, entrepaneur is

0:15:58.840 --> 0:16:00.840
<v Speaker 2>this just across the board, We.

0:16:01.240 --> 0:16:05.800
<v Speaker 1>Have pretty broad exposure. We have really been able to

0:16:05.840 --> 0:16:09.520
<v Speaker 1>take advantage of the diversified nature of our portfolio to

0:16:09.600 --> 0:16:13.880
<v Speaker 1>have quite a lot of more audiosyncratic risk, by which

0:16:13.920 --> 0:16:20.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean really size and liquidity, so smaller cap Japanese

0:16:20.240 --> 0:16:27.080
<v Speaker 1>companies where other people running more concentrated strategies would find

0:16:27.120 --> 0:16:29.840
<v Speaker 1>it difficult to put money to work. Because we have

0:16:30.320 --> 0:16:33.800
<v Speaker 1>this broader portfolio, we can invest in those companies and

0:16:33.880 --> 0:16:37.520
<v Speaker 1>take advantage potentially of the work of other activist investors

0:16:37.560 --> 0:16:40.120
<v Speaker 1>who may have been working with the company behind the

0:16:40.160 --> 0:16:44.560
<v Speaker 1>scenes for several years in some cases, and also situations

0:16:44.560 --> 0:16:47.720
<v Speaker 1>which might be relatively liquid because of a family sheholder

0:16:47.800 --> 0:16:51.480
<v Speaker 1>or something. Because we have over fifty stocks in Japan,

0:16:51.600 --> 0:16:56.120
<v Speaker 1>we're not reliant on any one situation paying off within

0:16:56.160 --> 0:17:01.040
<v Speaker 1>a certain timeframe, and so we can manage that liquid risk.

0:17:01.080 --> 0:17:04.240
<v Speaker 1>I think a little better thanks to the diversification. But

0:17:04.520 --> 0:17:07.359
<v Speaker 1>it tends to be more domestic companies, but we also

0:17:07.440 --> 0:17:10.600
<v Speaker 1>have export facing companies as well. But yeah, across all

0:17:10.640 --> 0:17:11.440
<v Speaker 1>sorts of sectors.

0:17:12.160 --> 0:17:14.240
<v Speaker 2>And it's interesting, isn't it that Japan is one of

0:17:14.240 --> 0:17:16.920
<v Speaker 2>the places where small caps have started to auform larger

0:17:16.960 --> 0:17:19.359
<v Speaker 2>companies rather like in the US. Not in the UK

0:17:19.480 --> 0:17:22.399
<v Speaker 2>unfortunately as usual, but in Japan and the US you've

0:17:22.400 --> 0:17:24.120
<v Speaker 2>started seeing a bit of a shift from very large

0:17:24.119 --> 0:17:26.720
<v Speaker 2>companies at performing to the small and medium sized companies

0:17:26.720 --> 0:17:28.560
<v Speaker 2>at performing at the last couple of quarters.

0:17:28.920 --> 0:17:32.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean, you still find companies in Japan with

0:17:32.320 --> 0:17:35.240
<v Speaker 1>negative enterprise values, and some of these small companies just

0:17:35.280 --> 0:17:38.239
<v Speaker 1>have very inefficient balance sheets which result in just very

0:17:38.320 --> 0:17:41.560
<v Speaker 1>cheap valuations, and they really have been overlooked, whereas some

0:17:41.600 --> 0:17:45.000
<v Speaker 1>of the more successful world beating Japanese companies are still

0:17:45.040 --> 0:17:49.400
<v Speaker 1>trading it really quite phenomenal valuation multiples which haven't yet derated.

0:17:49.680 --> 0:17:53.240
<v Speaker 1>And so there's a degree of rotation and mean reversion there.

0:17:54.160 --> 0:17:56.360
<v Speaker 2>And then there's even though the market has performed very

0:17:56.359 --> 0:18:00.119
<v Speaker 2>well recently, there's also the possible additional kicker from a

0:18:00.200 --> 0:18:01.040
<v Speaker 2>strengthening Yan.

0:18:01.600 --> 0:18:04.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, careful what you wish for, but I mean I

0:18:04.359 --> 0:18:08.440
<v Speaker 1>think certainly Japanese financials well positioned to benefit from that,

0:18:09.080 --> 0:18:11.720
<v Speaker 1>in particular at the large banks, but the pace at

0:18:11.760 --> 0:18:14.119
<v Speaker 1>which that will happen, a manner in which will happen

0:18:14.600 --> 0:18:17.920
<v Speaker 1>is unclear, and so that again, having a diversified portfolio

0:18:18.240 --> 0:18:21.359
<v Speaker 1>in the context of a larger global portfolio gives us

0:18:21.359 --> 0:18:23.080
<v Speaker 1>some sort of comfort.

0:18:23.160 --> 0:18:25.040
<v Speaker 2>And careful what we wish for. What should we be

0:18:25.040 --> 0:18:26.480
<v Speaker 2>worrying about with a strengthening yan.

0:18:27.080 --> 0:18:30.160
<v Speaker 1>Well, there is a huge amount of debt in Japan

0:18:30.359 --> 0:18:33.200
<v Speaker 1>which is one of the reasons why interest rates haven't

0:18:33.240 --> 0:18:36.560
<v Speaker 1>yet managed to rise to the level needed to stabilize

0:18:36.560 --> 0:18:41.119
<v Speaker 1>the currency, and so there are those perennial fears that

0:18:41.640 --> 0:18:44.840
<v Speaker 1>the BOJ will lose control of the exchange rate. On

0:18:44.880 --> 0:18:47.919
<v Speaker 1>the other hand, there are huge amounts of assets belonging

0:18:47.920 --> 0:18:50.960
<v Speaker 1>to Japan overseas, and if they would come back, then

0:18:51.160 --> 0:18:54.840
<v Speaker 1>that would have the opposite effect. So it's really interesting

0:18:54.880 --> 0:18:56.439
<v Speaker 1>times to be investing in Japan.

0:18:57.040 --> 0:19:00.000
<v Speaker 2>I suspect that almost everyone who listens to this podcast

0:19:00.200 --> 0:19:02.240
<v Speaker 2>it's invested in Japan, because we have been going on

0:19:02.280 --> 0:19:05.480
<v Speaker 2>about it for a very long time, very long time.

0:19:06.000 --> 0:19:09.080
<v Speaker 2>There's a wonderful chart. I like this chart enormously in

0:19:09.160 --> 0:19:11.919
<v Speaker 2>the fact cheap for the fund which has bubbles on

0:19:11.960 --> 0:19:15.400
<v Speaker 2>it so we can see where the fund is allocated,

0:19:15.680 --> 0:19:17.840
<v Speaker 2>and I'm interested to see there are quite big bubbles

0:19:17.880 --> 0:19:19.800
<v Speaker 2>for both mining and oil.

0:19:20.480 --> 0:19:22.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, if you remember, I was saying, we're really looking

0:19:22.960 --> 0:19:26.080
<v Speaker 1>for two sorts of situations, high return situations where those

0:19:26.080 --> 0:19:30.480
<v Speaker 1>returns can be sustained, and lower return situations where we

0:19:30.560 --> 0:19:33.119
<v Speaker 1>have confidence that the returns are going to pick up

0:19:33.160 --> 0:19:37.320
<v Speaker 1>sooner than the market things is likely. And mining and

0:19:37.400 --> 0:19:41.360
<v Speaker 1>shipping into examples of that. Latter mining went through its

0:19:41.359 --> 0:19:46.800
<v Speaker 1>supercycle when China really opened up and everyone started is

0:19:46.880 --> 0:19:52.000
<v Speaker 1>selling resources to China, and naturally, human biases being what

0:19:52.080 --> 0:19:54.560
<v Speaker 1>they are, this results in massive having investment ad buys

0:19:54.680 --> 0:19:59.119
<v Speaker 1>mining companies, which resulted in terrible returns, which results in

0:19:59.200 --> 0:20:04.720
<v Speaker 1>punishment and capital starvation. Until mining companies were trading ten

0:20:04.800 --> 0:20:07.359
<v Speaker 1>years ago at big discounts to well, they should be

0:20:07.440 --> 0:20:10.359
<v Speaker 1>valued at discounts book value in some cases, and the

0:20:10.440 --> 0:20:14.359
<v Speaker 1>return of capital discipline and the opportunity for investors like

0:20:14.440 --> 0:20:17.960
<v Speaker 1>us to get involved in the large mining companies which

0:20:18.040 --> 0:20:21.560
<v Speaker 1>had got religion again in terms of understanding capital discipline,

0:20:21.840 --> 0:20:25.200
<v Speaker 1>and they've been a feature of portfolio for a while. Obviously,

0:20:25.240 --> 0:20:27.439
<v Speaker 1>the time taken to bring on a new mine is

0:20:27.520 --> 0:20:30.280
<v Speaker 1>measured in the years, if not decades, and again it'll

0:20:30.359 --> 0:20:33.160
<v Speaker 1>run like memory semmes. That gives us the confidence that

0:20:33.160 --> 0:20:35.560
<v Speaker 1>that picture is not going to change too quickly and

0:20:35.600 --> 0:20:39.720
<v Speaker 1>they're going to have the opportunity to sustain high returns

0:20:39.440 --> 0:20:42.720
<v Speaker 1>for a while. Yet shipping is something similar. I mean,

0:20:42.760 --> 0:20:47.520
<v Speaker 1>before the financial crisis, abundant liquidity and very very low

0:20:47.560 --> 0:20:50.480
<v Speaker 1>barriers to entry. This is not a high quality sector.

0:20:51.080 --> 0:20:53.560
<v Speaker 1>Meant that a huge amount of money flooded into shipping.

0:20:53.640 --> 0:20:57.200
<v Speaker 1>You could borrow money from your bank, you'd get some

0:20:57.240 --> 0:21:00.320
<v Speaker 1>sort of credit from the shipyard which didn't require money

0:21:00.359 --> 0:21:03.440
<v Speaker 1>up front. You could raise money in the equity market

0:21:03.480 --> 0:21:07.919
<v Speaker 1>fairly quickly, so anyone could could raise a capital to

0:21:08.080 --> 0:21:10.760
<v Speaker 1>put in an order for a ship, resulting in massive

0:21:10.760 --> 0:21:15.040
<v Speaker 1>over ordering. Financial crisis happens with Lehman, Yet the ships

0:21:15.080 --> 0:21:17.560
<v Speaker 1>continue to be delivered from the shipyards even after the

0:21:17.560 --> 0:21:23.240
<v Speaker 1>financial crisis. A massive oversupply claps in shipping rates bankruptcies,

0:21:24.040 --> 0:21:25.960
<v Speaker 1>and then a full storm and around so of twenty

0:21:26.040 --> 0:21:28.800
<v Speaker 1>sixteen when private equity felt that it could get involved

0:21:28.800 --> 0:21:31.680
<v Speaker 1>and take advantage to the distress, which resulted simply and

0:21:31.800 --> 0:21:34.440
<v Speaker 1>more ordering in the deferral of the recovery. But the

0:21:34.480 --> 0:21:37.160
<v Speaker 1>great thing about ships is that they have a finite life.

0:21:37.560 --> 0:21:41.879
<v Speaker 1>Typically for a blue chip customer, twenty years is the limit,

0:21:42.240 --> 0:21:45.280
<v Speaker 1>which from an investment point view is fantastic because it

0:21:45.320 --> 0:21:48.760
<v Speaker 1>means we have visibility into the future. We can see

0:21:48.760 --> 0:21:50.879
<v Speaker 1>not only how many ships are on the water today,

0:21:51.040 --> 0:21:54.080
<v Speaker 1>but what their age is and when they're likely to

0:21:54.720 --> 0:21:58.240
<v Speaker 1>need to be scrapped. And so we've been really investing

0:21:58.240 --> 0:22:01.760
<v Speaker 1>in shipping since these companies came out and started to

0:22:01.760 --> 0:22:07.760
<v Speaker 1>come out Chapter eleven and refloat and taking a basket

0:22:07.760 --> 0:22:11.080
<v Speaker 1>approach with this sort of diversified portfolio, investing in a

0:22:11.160 --> 0:22:14.000
<v Speaker 1>number of different shipping companies and in a number of

0:22:14.040 --> 0:22:18.320
<v Speaker 1>different shipping asset classes. And more recently we've really focused

0:22:18.480 --> 0:22:23.600
<v Speaker 1>on tankers and we've sold our shipping in container carriers

0:22:23.760 --> 0:22:27.000
<v Speaker 1>LNG carriers in particular, as more capital has gone into

0:22:27.080 --> 0:22:28.840
<v Speaker 1>those areas. And if you were to go to China

0:22:28.960 --> 0:22:31.800
<v Speaker 1>or Korea today, you would see a large number of

0:22:31.800 --> 0:22:36.160
<v Speaker 1>shipyards all very busy working on a construction of new

0:22:36.359 --> 0:22:41.639
<v Speaker 1>LNG carriers and container carriers, but relatively little supply coming

0:22:41.680 --> 0:22:45.800
<v Speaker 1>into inter tankers or dry bulkers or into those categories.

0:22:45.960 --> 0:22:48.760
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so that's an area that's got a bit to run.

0:22:48.840 --> 0:22:51.040
<v Speaker 1>You think, well, we were, as I say, we're out

0:22:51.080 --> 0:22:55.000
<v Speaker 1>for LNG carriers, we're our containers, and we have been

0:22:55.040 --> 0:22:58.320
<v Speaker 1>taking profits in tankers and some of our dry bulk,

0:22:58.800 --> 0:23:01.480
<v Speaker 1>so you know, we are towards the end of that cycle.

0:23:01.880 --> 0:23:04.000
<v Speaker 1>As I said, the barriers to entry and shipping are

0:23:04.080 --> 0:23:08.480
<v Speaker 1>much lower than other areas, so you are really constrained

0:23:08.600 --> 0:23:11.840
<v Speaker 1>by the availability of capacity in the shipyards. And the

0:23:11.880 --> 0:23:13.840
<v Speaker 1>great thing is we have visibility into that. They do

0:23:13.920 --> 0:23:17.679
<v Speaker 1>publish their order books, and you should never underestimate the

0:23:17.720 --> 0:23:20.280
<v Speaker 1>ability of somebody to come in and take a view

0:23:20.320 --> 0:23:22.600
<v Speaker 1>that the market could support more capacity.

0:23:23.080 --> 0:23:25.320
<v Speaker 2>Interesting, I would have thought the barriers that entry and

0:23:25.359 --> 0:23:27.919
<v Speaker 2>the shipping industry would be huge. That's not a simple

0:23:28.440 --> 0:23:29.280
<v Speaker 2>thing to get into.

0:23:30.720 --> 0:23:33.840
<v Speaker 1>The LCC costs one hundred and fifty million dollars, say,

0:23:34.119 --> 0:23:37.560
<v Speaker 1>but other types of shipping, you know, cheaper, and there

0:23:37.600 --> 0:23:43.040
<v Speaker 1>is an entire industry of financiers and brokers and owners

0:23:43.160 --> 0:23:46.480
<v Speaker 1>and yards who can help you ordership.

0:23:47.359 --> 0:23:49.919
<v Speaker 2>Let's shift back to the energy sector. We've got holdings

0:23:49.960 --> 0:23:53.080
<v Speaker 2>in oil and coal and all sorts of things. And

0:23:53.119 --> 0:23:55.560
<v Speaker 2>one of the interesting things about the energy sector at

0:23:55.600 --> 0:23:57.840
<v Speaker 2>the moment is that the transition, which I think a

0:23:57.840 --> 0:23:59.760
<v Speaker 2>lot of people predicted at the beginning, has not turned

0:23:59.760 --> 0:24:02.160
<v Speaker 2>out to be a transition, but to be in addition,

0:24:02.440 --> 0:24:06.639
<v Speaker 2>so the whole energy infrastructure is expanding in every area,

0:24:06.760 --> 0:24:09.000
<v Speaker 2>partly because going back to the beginning of our conversation,

0:24:09.040 --> 0:24:11.960
<v Speaker 2>partly of course, down to the energy requirements of AI.

0:24:13.040 --> 0:24:15.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean, and actually, funnily enough, with shipping, one

0:24:15.600 --> 0:24:18.000
<v Speaker 1>of the common themes there is energy. I mean, with

0:24:18.040 --> 0:24:21.639
<v Speaker 1>the exception of container shipping. Most shipping is about the

0:24:21.680 --> 0:24:25.040
<v Speaker 1>transport of energy, whether you're talking about coal or oil

0:24:25.560 --> 0:24:29.159
<v Speaker 1>or protein. Shipping is really something to enable you to

0:24:29.240 --> 0:24:32.600
<v Speaker 1>ubcharge the price of energy in one place versus the

0:24:32.640 --> 0:24:37.960
<v Speaker 1>price of energy in another. But yeah, all this enthusiasm

0:24:38.040 --> 0:24:41.480
<v Speaker 1>for the energy transition has led some people to assume

0:24:41.800 --> 0:24:45.840
<v Speaker 1>or that traditional fossil energy is going to stop being

0:24:45.880 --> 0:24:49.240
<v Speaker 1>consumed in a very short period of time, and as

0:24:49.240 --> 0:24:55.440
<v Speaker 1>a result, been under investment in traditional energy and related areas,

0:24:55.880 --> 0:24:58.760
<v Speaker 1>one of which is shipping, another of which might be

0:24:58.920 --> 0:25:03.240
<v Speaker 1>the offshore drilling company needs for example. So we are

0:25:03.800 --> 0:25:06.080
<v Speaker 1>very conscious that well, we're no better than anyone else

0:25:06.119 --> 0:25:09.000
<v Speaker 1>are predicting the price of energy, But there is a

0:25:09.040 --> 0:25:13.000
<v Speaker 1>whole load of activities around energy which have suffered from

0:25:13.040 --> 0:25:16.040
<v Speaker 1>under investment, and therefore we're confident are going to see

0:25:16.040 --> 0:25:17.280
<v Speaker 1>improving returns.

0:25:18.760 --> 0:25:21.639
<v Speaker 2>Look, when you look at the portfolio, four hundred stocks

0:25:21.640 --> 0:25:24.080
<v Speaker 2>has quite a lot to keep an eye on. Obviously

0:25:24.080 --> 0:25:25.840
<v Speaker 2>that you have, there's a team of you. But what

0:25:26.320 --> 0:25:28.000
<v Speaker 2>worries you, what keeps you up at night?

0:25:28.560 --> 0:25:31.239
<v Speaker 1>That's a great question. We do take great comfort from

0:25:31.280 --> 0:25:34.320
<v Speaker 1>the diversification in the portfolio. I don't just mean the

0:25:34.359 --> 0:25:37.240
<v Speaker 1>number of stocks, but I also mean the non non

0:25:37.240 --> 0:25:41.800
<v Speaker 1>correlated nature of the ideas within the portfolio. And thanks

0:25:41.800 --> 0:25:44.879
<v Speaker 1>to the versatility of this capital cycle approach, as I said,

0:25:44.960 --> 0:25:48.320
<v Speaker 1>we are able to sort of map any company we

0:25:48.400 --> 0:25:50.719
<v Speaker 1>come across through this capital cycle lens.

0:25:51.160 --> 0:25:54.720
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, it's nothing to worry about.

0:25:55.440 --> 0:25:58.600
<v Speaker 1>Many many things can go wrong, but hopefully as they

0:25:58.640 --> 0:26:02.200
<v Speaker 1>go wrong, they're not going to dominate the portfolio. Our

0:26:02.280 --> 0:26:05.600
<v Speaker 1>largest position is around two percent of the portfolio.

0:26:05.480 --> 0:26:07.560
<v Speaker 2>In market crist as a whole. I mean, as we

0:26:07.560 --> 0:26:11.000
<v Speaker 2>were saying earlier, you were saying earlier, there's a lot

0:26:11.000 --> 0:26:13.120
<v Speaker 2>of excitement in the market, there's a lot of momentum,

0:26:13.119 --> 0:26:17.639
<v Speaker 2>and there's a lot of retail participation, the sharp rises

0:26:17.680 --> 0:26:20.199
<v Speaker 2>in the store market, and say not just career but

0:26:20.240 --> 0:26:23.240
<v Speaker 2>also maybe the US have participated to a fairly healthy

0:26:23.560 --> 0:26:28.360
<v Speaker 2>wealth effect across the board. If there is a reversal

0:26:28.640 --> 0:26:32.159
<v Speaker 2>in global store markets, maybe it really is led as

0:26:32.240 --> 0:26:35.359
<v Speaker 2>long predicted by big tech, etc. Then you don't just

0:26:35.440 --> 0:26:39.760
<v Speaker 2>get a market collapse, you also get a reverse wealth effect,

0:26:39.800 --> 0:26:42.399
<v Speaker 2>and maybe you get much more ever of a follow

0:26:42.440 --> 0:26:45.000
<v Speaker 2>through impact then you might have had previously. I don't know.

0:26:45.040 --> 0:26:46.560
<v Speaker 2>A lot of things keep me up at night.

0:26:46.600 --> 0:26:48.920
<v Speaker 1>You're completely right, and we do look at this sort

0:26:48.960 --> 0:26:52.840
<v Speaker 1>of passive driven momentum in the market and keep anticipating

0:26:53.080 --> 0:26:55.639
<v Speaker 1>its demise, which never seems to happen. But what you

0:26:55.680 --> 0:26:58.359
<v Speaker 1>wish for, and when it does happen, there will be

0:26:58.400 --> 0:27:01.480
<v Speaker 1>all sorts of second and third all the consequences which

0:27:01.520 --> 0:27:04.479
<v Speaker 1>will impact all of us. I am hopeful that we

0:27:04.520 --> 0:27:07.880
<v Speaker 1>will do better than most other participants in the equity market,

0:27:08.440 --> 0:27:11.879
<v Speaker 1>but everything, if everything is crashing, then we will suffer

0:27:11.920 --> 0:27:12.760
<v Speaker 1>with everybody else.

0:27:13.040 --> 0:27:15.239
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, you wouldn't need to hope that. I

0:27:15.280 --> 0:27:17.679
<v Speaker 2>don't think I've ever had anybody on the stop market

0:27:17.680 --> 0:27:20.320
<v Speaker 2>who said that their expectation is that things should go wrong,

0:27:20.359 --> 0:27:24.520
<v Speaker 2>they'll do worse than everybody else. We have a bad

0:27:24.560 --> 0:27:27.440
<v Speaker 2>beginning for a conversation or end for a conversation.

0:27:29.240 --> 0:27:30.040
<v Speaker 1>That's fair enough.

0:27:31.920 --> 0:27:34.080
<v Speaker 2>Listen, Lick. I don't know if you've had you been

0:27:34.119 --> 0:27:36.240
<v Speaker 2>on holiday yet or not, but one of the things

0:27:36.240 --> 0:27:38.800
<v Speaker 2>that we're asking everybody at the moment is what they're

0:27:38.840 --> 0:27:41.640
<v Speaker 2>reading when you when you finally head to the beach,

0:27:41.680 --> 0:27:43.719
<v Speaker 2>or perhaps you've already been to the beach, what are

0:27:43.720 --> 0:27:44.399
<v Speaker 2>you taking with you?

0:27:44.760 --> 0:27:47.240
<v Speaker 1>I've just come back. I took one book which I

0:27:47.280 --> 0:27:50.119
<v Speaker 1>didn't manage to open, but I'm looking forward to, which

0:27:50.160 --> 0:27:52.440
<v Speaker 1>is The Mask of Demetrius by Eric Ambler, which is

0:27:52.440 --> 0:27:55.200
<v Speaker 1>an old fashioned thriller which I've had recommended by a

0:27:55.240 --> 0:27:59.000
<v Speaker 1>couple of people, set in Istanbul and apparently a writer

0:27:59.200 --> 0:28:03.000
<v Speaker 1>admired by Graham Green and Ian Fleming. The book I

0:28:03.000 --> 0:28:09.000
<v Speaker 1>did read on holiday most recently was Recession by Tyler Goodspeed,

0:28:09.480 --> 0:28:13.959
<v Speaker 1>which is a really interesting piece of economic history, interesting

0:28:14.040 --> 0:28:17.880
<v Speaker 1>not just for the thesis itself, but just for the

0:28:17.920 --> 0:28:21.320
<v Speaker 1>wide ranging examination of three hundred and twenty five years

0:28:21.359 --> 0:28:24.320
<v Speaker 1>of economic history in the US and the UK, and

0:28:24.359 --> 0:28:30.879
<v Speaker 1>its basic thesis is that, contrary to most people thinking

0:28:30.920 --> 0:28:35.480
<v Speaker 1>that economic expansions eventually collapse under their own weight or

0:28:35.960 --> 0:28:38.959
<v Speaker 1>die of old age, that there's no reason why there

0:28:39.000 --> 0:28:42.920
<v Speaker 1>has to be the case, and recessions come along for

0:28:43.000 --> 0:28:48.040
<v Speaker 1>almost random reasons. They're a function of not bubbles getting

0:28:48.680 --> 0:28:54.120
<v Speaker 1>two or economic expansions lasting too long, or economies getting

0:28:54.160 --> 0:29:01.760
<v Speaker 1>too hot, but more external things like war, failed harvests, plagues, strikes,

0:29:02.320 --> 0:29:05.920
<v Speaker 1>and energy shocks in a way that's reassuring.

0:29:05.520 --> 0:29:08.360
<v Speaker 2>Not really, I think we've got strong chances of all

0:29:08.400 --> 0:29:08.880
<v Speaker 2>those things.

0:29:10.400 --> 0:29:12.520
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot of geopolitics getting on at the moment

0:29:12.560 --> 0:29:15.480
<v Speaker 1>where you're talking about Russia, Ukraine.

0:29:15.360 --> 0:29:17.959
<v Speaker 2>El Nino and harvests.

0:29:17.480 --> 0:29:21.680
<v Speaker 1>Eran, Taiwan, all of that, and then also, I mean

0:29:21.880 --> 0:29:26.200
<v Speaker 1>oil and energy prices are you know, they are within

0:29:26.840 --> 0:29:30.120
<v Speaker 1>within historical bounds at the moment, but that may not

0:29:30.160 --> 0:29:32.920
<v Speaker 1>stay the case. That that may not stay the way forever.

0:29:33.280 --> 0:29:36.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Interesting, Okay, So I'm fascinated by the fact that

0:29:36.520 --> 0:29:40.320
<v Speaker 2>you spent your holiday not reading a thriller that everyone loved,

0:29:40.360 --> 0:29:45.760
<v Speaker 2>but reading a possibly rather too long book on recessions.

0:29:46.000 --> 0:29:48.440
<v Speaker 2>I hope there are a couple of romantic nobles in that.

0:29:48.680 --> 0:29:49.640
<v Speaker 2>It was something.

0:29:51.920 --> 0:29:54.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's a book by Ben Lerner as well, which

0:29:54.000 --> 0:29:54.880
<v Speaker 1>I've got in my bag.

0:29:54.920 --> 0:30:00.240
<v Speaker 2>But all right, good. We've had some excellent recommended since

0:30:00.320 --> 0:30:02.800
<v Speaker 2>this year. Actually, I'll send I'll send you a list.

0:30:02.920 --> 0:30:05.000
<v Speaker 2>Should you be going on holiday again, is all over

0:30:05.040 --> 0:30:05.560
<v Speaker 2>for this year?

0:30:06.120 --> 0:30:08.560
<v Speaker 1>That would be great And I'm yeah, I am. I

0:30:08.560 --> 0:30:10.760
<v Speaker 1>am actually going on and getting off to your Pat

0:30:10.760 --> 0:30:12.040
<v Speaker 1>Moss at the end of the month, so that would

0:30:12.040 --> 0:30:12.360
<v Speaker 1>be fun.

0:30:12.640 --> 0:30:15.680
<v Speaker 2>Okay, brilliant, Luke, thank you so much for joining us today.

0:30:15.760 --> 0:30:28.600
<v Speaker 2>That was all really interesting. Thank you, Marion, thanks for

0:30:28.600 --> 0:30:30.600
<v Speaker 2>listening to this week's maryn Dogs Money If you like

0:30:30.640 --> 0:30:33.240
<v Speaker 2>our show, Greek review and subscribe wherever you listen to

0:30:33.280 --> 0:30:35.680
<v Speaker 2>podcasts and keep sending your questions or comments to Merrorn

0:30:35.720 --> 0:30:37.960
<v Speaker 2>Money at Bloomberg dot net. You can also follow me

0:30:38.000 --> 0:30:40.320
<v Speaker 2>and John on Twitter or ex I'm at marys w

0:30:40.480 --> 0:30:43.880
<v Speaker 2>and John is John Underscorestepic. This episode was hosted by

0:30:43.960 --> 0:30:46.920
<v Speaker 2>me marin Sunset Web. It was produced by Someersardi and Moses,

0:30:46.960 --> 0:30:49.760
<v Speaker 2>and it sound designed by Blake Mabels and special thanks

0:30:49.760 --> 0:30:50.560
<v Speaker 2>to Luke Bridgeman