WEBVTT - US-China Trade Tensions Grow

0:00:02.560 --> 0:00:13.440
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. Bloomberg Tech is alive

0:00:13.480 --> 0:00:17.279
<v Speaker 1>from coast to coast with Caroline Hide in New York

0:00:17.600 --> 0:00:20.400
<v Speaker 1>and Eva Low in San Francisco.

0:00:22.600 --> 0:00:26.200
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Tech coming up. Escalating trade tensions between

0:00:26.280 --> 0:00:29.000
<v Speaker 2>China and the US and now Europe too, will discuss

0:00:29.000 --> 0:00:31.880
<v Speaker 2>what the latest trade showdown means for the tech sector.

0:00:32.040 --> 0:00:35.000
<v Speaker 3>US concerns of an AI bubble grow louder among global

0:00:35.080 --> 0:00:38.320
<v Speaker 3>fund managers, will discuss the valuation anxiety in their latest

0:00:38.320 --> 0:00:39.680
<v Speaker 3>Bag of America survey.

0:00:40.280 --> 0:00:44.680
<v Speaker 2>And Instagram makes some changes with tighter content restrictions for teenagers.

0:00:44.880 --> 0:00:47.519
<v Speaker 2>Will discussed with Instagram's global director of Policy.

0:00:47.600 --> 0:00:49.479
<v Speaker 3>But first to check in on these public markets, and

0:00:49.520 --> 0:00:52.440
<v Speaker 3>once again, anxiety returns to the four We are worried

0:00:52.479 --> 0:00:55.840
<v Speaker 3>about US, China, Europe, China and the trade tit for

0:00:56.000 --> 0:00:58.800
<v Speaker 3>tat that really moves out into the world of shipping.

0:00:58.840 --> 0:01:00.800
<v Speaker 3>We're down nine tens percent on the index of the

0:01:00.880 --> 0:01:04.240
<v Speaker 3>NASA one hundred, but bitcoin crypto in the eye of

0:01:04.240 --> 0:01:06.280
<v Speaker 3>the storm and one hundred and fifty billion dollars wiped

0:01:06.280 --> 0:01:08.480
<v Speaker 3>out in terms of market cap. Across the industry. We

0:01:08.560 --> 0:01:12.400
<v Speaker 3>see margin call's leverage flush out. It really is a dal.

0:01:12.200 --> 0:01:14.640
<v Speaker 4>Up of worries when it comes to geopolitical risk.

0:01:14.480 --> 0:01:18.160
<v Speaker 2>Here, Okay, let's get to our top story. Treasurary Secretary

0:01:18.200 --> 0:01:22.520
<v Speaker 2>Scott Besson said he still expects Presidents Trump and Jijingping

0:01:22.880 --> 0:01:26.640
<v Speaker 2>to meet, though China's latest escalation in that trade conflict

0:01:26.680 --> 0:01:30.160
<v Speaker 2>between the world's two largest economies raises questions about all

0:01:30.200 --> 0:01:33.800
<v Speaker 2>issues can be resolved before that meeting. Bloomberg Senior Technology

0:01:33.880 --> 0:01:36.440
<v Speaker 2>editor Mike Shepherd joins us, Mike, what do we need

0:01:36.480 --> 0:01:39.520
<v Speaker 2>to know? What's the latest on those US China trade talks.

0:01:40.720 --> 0:01:43.720
<v Speaker 5>Well, the latest really is that China is hitting the

0:01:43.840 --> 0:01:47.199
<v Speaker 5>gas rather than hitting the break now, as the two

0:01:47.200 --> 0:01:49.960
<v Speaker 5>sides prepared to meet to discuss these ahead of a

0:01:50.000 --> 0:01:55.120
<v Speaker 5>possible summit between Presidents Donald Trump and shujiin Ping, China.

0:01:55.280 --> 0:01:59.880
<v Speaker 5>Earlier today unveiled new measures aimed at US shipping, saying

0:02:00.320 --> 0:02:03.720
<v Speaker 5>a South Korean company with strong US ties and the

0:02:03.800 --> 0:02:07.680
<v Speaker 5>US operations of that venture Hanua, and then also unveiling

0:02:07.720 --> 0:02:11.160
<v Speaker 5>other possible por fees. This is the latest escalation in

0:02:11.200 --> 0:02:13.919
<v Speaker 5>an area where Beijing feels like it has an advantage

0:02:14.120 --> 0:02:17.400
<v Speaker 5>over the supply chain. China is has been the world's

0:02:17.480 --> 0:02:21.240
<v Speaker 5>largest shipbuilder since twenty seventeen, and it follows the last

0:02:21.240 --> 0:02:25.560
<v Speaker 5>week's move where China imposed new export controls on sales

0:02:25.720 --> 0:02:29.400
<v Speaker 5>rare earths minerals to the US and to other countries

0:02:29.440 --> 0:02:32.560
<v Speaker 5>around the world. Again another area where they have a

0:02:32.680 --> 0:02:35.840
<v Speaker 5>hold on the supply chain. And even as Sacott Bessant

0:02:35.880 --> 0:02:38.120
<v Speaker 5>is saying that he sees the prospects for a meeting

0:02:38.200 --> 0:02:42.120
<v Speaker 5>between Donald Trump and Hijimping, he has also indicated that

0:02:42.200 --> 0:02:44.840
<v Speaker 5>he sees China's moves against rare earths and he hasn't

0:02:44.880 --> 0:02:48.360
<v Speaker 5>commented yet on the shipping decision by China, but he

0:02:48.440 --> 0:02:51.320
<v Speaker 5>sees those steps as aiming at Bazooka at the global

0:02:51.480 --> 0:02:53.880
<v Speaker 5>supply chain, and it is not the tone you would

0:02:53.880 --> 0:02:56.399
<v Speaker 5>expect the two sides to be striking as they try

0:02:56.480 --> 0:02:57.880
<v Speaker 5>to reach some sort of an agreement.

0:02:58.080 --> 0:03:01.800
<v Speaker 3>The global supply chain is key, and Mike Europe really

0:03:01.800 --> 0:03:04.880
<v Speaker 3>considering what its own options are where leverage can be

0:03:04.919 --> 0:03:08.200
<v Speaker 3>applied to protect its own manufacturers because the rare earth

0:03:08.280 --> 0:03:09.760
<v Speaker 3>implications are large for them too.

0:03:11.200 --> 0:03:13.640
<v Speaker 5>The rare Earth's implications are huge, and they're looking at

0:03:13.800 --> 0:03:16.680
<v Speaker 5>at a number of fronts. One area of particular concern,

0:03:16.760 --> 0:03:20.520
<v Speaker 5>of course, has been the vehicle industry and electric vehicles

0:03:20.560 --> 0:03:24.240
<v Speaker 5>more specifically, and what the EU is considering now is

0:03:24.280 --> 0:03:27.720
<v Speaker 5>whether to require Chinese firms that want to operate within

0:03:27.800 --> 0:03:30.720
<v Speaker 5>the block to share technology. And this is sort of

0:03:31.040 --> 0:03:34.840
<v Speaker 5>taking a page from Beijing's own playbook. Any foreign company

0:03:34.840 --> 0:03:37.240
<v Speaker 5>that wanted to do business with the Chinese partner in

0:03:37.320 --> 0:03:42.000
<v Speaker 5>mainland China had to share technology with that partner as

0:03:42.160 --> 0:03:44.920
<v Speaker 5>really the price of admission, and the EU is now

0:03:44.960 --> 0:03:47.360
<v Speaker 5>considering the same, and it is worried because it is

0:03:47.400 --> 0:03:51.320
<v Speaker 5>seeing byd make such inroads into the European market and

0:03:51.360 --> 0:03:54.280
<v Speaker 5>putting some of the European makers and their own EV

0:03:54.600 --> 0:03:58.880
<v Speaker 5>ambitions in jeopardy now would require not only the sharing

0:03:58.960 --> 0:04:02.600
<v Speaker 5>of technology, but this also joins CARA other steps that

0:04:02.640 --> 0:04:06.000
<v Speaker 5>are aimed at trying to rein in China on the continent,

0:04:06.040 --> 0:04:09.600
<v Speaker 5>and that includes a doubling last week of tariffs on

0:04:09.680 --> 0:04:13.160
<v Speaker 5>steel imports, clearly a move aimed at China. And this

0:04:13.240 --> 0:04:16.960
<v Speaker 5>also follows something that we were covering very closely over

0:04:17.000 --> 0:04:20.760
<v Speaker 5>the past two days, the Dutch decision to seize Nexperia

0:04:20.800 --> 0:04:25.480
<v Speaker 5>from its Chinese owner, Wingtech, a venture that was subject

0:04:25.480 --> 0:04:29.520
<v Speaker 5>to possible US sanctions. We learned today if it did

0:04:29.600 --> 0:04:33.320
<v Speaker 5>not replace its Chinese CEO, and that prompted the government

0:04:33.480 --> 0:04:36.680
<v Speaker 5>of the Dutch government to move and to seize control

0:04:36.920 --> 0:04:40.640
<v Speaker 5>of the local Nexperia from its Chinese parent.

0:04:41.400 --> 0:04:43.680
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg's Mike Sheppard, thank you very much. Let's get more

0:04:43.720 --> 0:04:46.880
<v Speaker 2>details in the story Mike mentioned. China retaliates after the

0:04:47.000 --> 0:04:50.320
<v Speaker 2>Dutch government invoked a Cold War era law to take

0:04:50.360 --> 0:04:54.880
<v Speaker 2>control of chip maker Nextperia, with Beijing now blocking Nexperia

0:04:55.160 --> 0:04:58.479
<v Speaker 2>and its subcontractors from exporting products from the Asian nation.

0:04:58.960 --> 0:05:01.640
<v Speaker 2>The company is a s theory of China's wing tech

0:05:01.680 --> 0:05:05.400
<v Speaker 2>technology and a key supplier of mature chips used by

0:05:05.400 --> 0:05:08.920
<v Speaker 2>the automotive and consumer electronic industries.

0:05:08.480 --> 0:05:11.719
<v Speaker 3>Carat Now, I look these US China trade tensions and

0:05:11.839 --> 0:05:15.080
<v Speaker 3>European China trade tensions clearly weighing and cross risk assets.

0:05:15.279 --> 0:05:18.120
<v Speaker 3>Most notably though, crypto It continued to lose ground after

0:05:18.120 --> 0:05:21.280
<v Speaker 3>our historic round of liquidations that triggered a sharp sell

0:05:21.320 --> 0:05:23.800
<v Speaker 3>off over the weekend. Remember look, bitcoin is in a

0:05:23.839 --> 0:05:27.080
<v Speaker 3>technical correction. The market value of all cryptocurrencies felled by

0:05:27.080 --> 0:05:28.640
<v Speaker 3>more than one hundred and fifty billion over the last

0:05:28.640 --> 0:05:31.800
<v Speaker 3>twenty four hour period, according to coin Gecko data. Personal

0:05:31.800 --> 0:05:34.679
<v Speaker 3>we turned to is Bloomberg's baby Lipshals covers tech assets

0:05:34.720 --> 0:05:37.920
<v Speaker 3>for US, and this is washing out the leverage from

0:05:37.960 --> 0:05:38.360
<v Speaker 3>the system.

0:05:38.520 --> 0:05:40.800
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, washing out the leverage. You have people getting margin called.

0:05:40.839 --> 0:05:43.200
<v Speaker 7>The thing that's interesting with crypto when you talk to

0:05:43.279 --> 0:05:46.520
<v Speaker 7>your kind of regular joe crypto trader, they sometimes use

0:05:46.600 --> 0:05:49.560
<v Speaker 7>fifty times leverage, which means that if they're that leverage

0:05:49.560 --> 0:05:51.760
<v Speaker 7>and you see any type of pullback, they don't get

0:05:51.800 --> 0:05:53.720
<v Speaker 7>to say, oh, actually, let me try to get some

0:05:53.760 --> 0:05:56.480
<v Speaker 7>massets together, they immediately get margin called. That's when you

0:05:56.520 --> 0:05:58.760
<v Speaker 7>see some of this leverage be fleshed out so quickly.

0:05:59.040 --> 0:06:00.960
<v Speaker 7>And this comes back to the debate twenty four to

0:06:01.040 --> 0:06:04.320
<v Speaker 7>seven trading. If you're asleep or taking a weekend off

0:06:04.400 --> 0:06:06.359
<v Speaker 7>to watch some college football, and all of a sudden

0:06:06.360 --> 0:06:08.960
<v Speaker 7>Bitcoin pulls back, well, guess what, your portfolio just.

0:06:09.000 --> 0:06:09.640
<v Speaker 6>Got blown up.

0:06:09.680 --> 0:06:11.840
<v Speaker 7>And that is something that we saw really happen and

0:06:11.880 --> 0:06:13.800
<v Speaker 7>play out over the weekend. And when you see the

0:06:13.800 --> 0:06:16.359
<v Speaker 7>back and forth with the US and China, we're going

0:06:16.440 --> 0:06:17.800
<v Speaker 7>to continue to see this volatility.

0:06:18.920 --> 0:06:19.200
<v Speaker 6>Bailey.

0:06:19.279 --> 0:06:21.640
<v Speaker 2>One of the best read stories on the Bloomberg terminal

0:06:21.680 --> 0:06:24.200
<v Speaker 2>and on the website is the latest Bank of America

0:06:24.279 --> 0:06:27.960
<v Speaker 2>fund manager survey, and in particular the focus on how

0:06:28.080 --> 0:06:32.239
<v Speaker 2>the market feels about AI valuations and equity markets.

0:06:32.560 --> 0:06:33.320
<v Speaker 6>What do we need to know?

0:06:33.839 --> 0:06:36.159
<v Speaker 7>You look at it and say that are there fears

0:06:36.200 --> 0:06:38.640
<v Speaker 7>of a bubble? Looking at that fifty four percent of

0:06:38.760 --> 0:06:41.479
<v Speaker 7>participants in that October pool pointing to tech stocks being

0:06:41.800 --> 0:06:45.280
<v Speaker 7>too expensive. You look at the Nasdaq one hundred forward

0:06:45.440 --> 0:06:48.120
<v Speaker 7>pe nearly twenty eight versus an average over the last

0:06:48.160 --> 0:06:51.600
<v Speaker 7>decade of twenty three. So all signs do point to overvaluation.

0:06:51.720 --> 0:06:54.200
<v Speaker 7>When I talk to portfolio managers, the question is where

0:06:54.279 --> 0:06:57.240
<v Speaker 7>you allocating capital? Is it that mag seven plus Broadcom?

0:06:57.560 --> 0:06:59.360
<v Speaker 7>And also if we're going to say that, hey, this

0:06:59.480 --> 0:07:02.720
<v Speaker 7>is a market could be overvalued, these are investors who

0:07:02.800 --> 0:07:05.960
<v Speaker 7>get paid to at least outperform their peers. So when

0:07:05.960 --> 0:07:08.000
<v Speaker 7>you see where stocks have been trading for the last

0:07:08.080 --> 0:07:09.600
<v Speaker 7>six months, or even if you go back to that

0:07:09.680 --> 0:07:12.680
<v Speaker 7>April bottom, if you missed out on the immediate snapback,

0:07:12.920 --> 0:07:14.880
<v Speaker 7>you kind of continue to buy even if you.

0:07:14.920 --> 0:07:16.560
<v Speaker 6>Think the stock market is overvalued.

0:07:16.720 --> 0:07:18.840
<v Speaker 7>We see investors kind of bending over backwards, doing some

0:07:18.920 --> 0:07:22.280
<v Speaker 7>mental gymnastics, saying, Okay, well maybe it's overvalued on the

0:07:22.360 --> 0:07:24.880
<v Speaker 7>forward price to earnings, but if we really look out

0:07:24.920 --> 0:07:27.360
<v Speaker 7>to twenty twenty eight, well, what does Nvidia look like

0:07:27.480 --> 0:07:30.280
<v Speaker 7>then then they're justifying buying now. But there's so much

0:07:30.360 --> 0:07:32.800
<v Speaker 7>talk about fraud, and we've seen it with large cap

0:07:32.880 --> 0:07:35.080
<v Speaker 7>tech with some of these smaller companies. I often keep

0:07:35.080 --> 0:07:38.040
<v Speaker 7>an eye on the Golden Sacks unprofitable basket. That's a

0:07:38.120 --> 0:07:41.080
<v Speaker 7>returned about forty eight percent year to date, so quickly

0:07:41.160 --> 0:07:45.520
<v Speaker 7>outstripping the Magnificent seven, quickly outstripping the Nasdaq one hundred.

0:07:45.800 --> 0:07:48.200
<v Speaker 7>Is that a short squeezer? Is that people taking on risk?

0:07:48.440 --> 0:07:50.960
<v Speaker 7>It's really been a topic of conversation depending on who

0:07:51.040 --> 0:07:52.600
<v Speaker 7>you talk to, whether that's in the private.

0:07:52.480 --> 0:07:55.080
<v Speaker 4>Or the public markets, topic of conversation on the earnings calls.

0:07:55.120 --> 0:07:57.200
<v Speaker 3>So we've just had a CFO City group being asked

0:07:57.200 --> 0:08:00.880
<v Speaker 3>about froth evaluations in AI. This is focused chutional investors

0:08:00.920 --> 0:08:02.560
<v Speaker 3>as well as retail investors.

0:08:02.240 --> 0:08:05.320
<v Speaker 7>And it's undeniable and the question is are you going

0:08:05.400 --> 0:08:07.440
<v Speaker 7>to hit on one of those ten investments. I look

0:08:07.440 --> 0:08:09.880
<v Speaker 7>at a company like Oaklow in the nuclear space, up

0:08:09.920 --> 0:08:11.800
<v Speaker 7>four hundred and seventy percent this year.

0:08:12.200 --> 0:08:14.400
<v Speaker 6>Quantum stocks are up hundreds of percents.

0:08:14.920 --> 0:08:16.920
<v Speaker 7>Is that a bet on these being kind of the

0:08:17.080 --> 0:08:20.120
<v Speaker 7>next wave of companies or is this investor saying you

0:08:20.200 --> 0:08:21.800
<v Speaker 7>know what if I hit one out of the twelve

0:08:21.920 --> 0:08:25.160
<v Speaker 7>companies and Quantum ends up being kind of the next paradigm. Well,

0:08:25.200 --> 0:08:27.440
<v Speaker 7>at least I got in on Invidia, the next in Vidia,

0:08:27.440 --> 0:08:27.800
<v Speaker 7>if you will.

0:08:27.840 --> 0:08:31.760
<v Speaker 2>On the ground floor, which is the biggest story today,

0:08:31.920 --> 0:08:34.959
<v Speaker 2>the CFO of a bank saying something quite measured, or

0:08:34.960 --> 0:08:37.400
<v Speaker 2>a Bank of America survey of all the fund managers

0:08:37.440 --> 0:08:39.760
<v Speaker 2>that they track CFO.

0:08:39.920 --> 0:08:42.679
<v Speaker 7>I think when you see management teams start to kind

0:08:42.720 --> 0:08:46.559
<v Speaker 7>of grapple publicly with the idea of froth and publicly

0:08:46.679 --> 0:08:49.320
<v Speaker 7>discussing whether they're going outright say are we in an

0:08:49.360 --> 0:08:52.040
<v Speaker 7>AI bubble or not? Whether you want to ascribe a

0:08:52.080 --> 0:08:53.720
<v Speaker 7>lot of value to what we've seen and heard from

0:08:53.760 --> 0:08:56.360
<v Speaker 7>the likes of Sam Altman talking about kind of it

0:08:56.520 --> 0:08:59.840
<v Speaker 7>is an AI bubble or Jeff Bezos. Every leader at

0:08:59.880 --> 0:09:03.000
<v Speaker 7>these biggest companies in the world, whether it's tech giants

0:09:03.240 --> 0:09:06.000
<v Speaker 7>or whether it's the c suite of banks, are grappling

0:09:06.080 --> 0:09:06.760
<v Speaker 7>with this debate.

0:09:07.040 --> 0:09:07.840
<v Speaker 6>And it's going to be.

0:09:07.920 --> 0:09:09.800
<v Speaker 7>Something that is a theme in this earning season, whether

0:09:09.840 --> 0:09:11.760
<v Speaker 7>you want to talk about tariffs, but it's going to

0:09:12.000 --> 0:09:16.120
<v Speaker 7>inevitably come back to AI bubble valuations and expectations because

0:09:16.280 --> 0:09:19.040
<v Speaker 7>there is so much debate around the cycling of money

0:09:19.080 --> 0:09:22.080
<v Speaker 7>and what this actually will mean with building out data centers,

0:09:22.240 --> 0:09:25.719
<v Speaker 7>buying these chips, open AI, partnering with seemingly everyone. What

0:09:25.920 --> 0:09:28.240
<v Speaker 7>that does mean when we look back a year from now,

0:09:28.320 --> 0:09:30.600
<v Speaker 7>two years from now, was this kind of the buildout

0:09:30.640 --> 0:09:33.480
<v Speaker 7>of the next generation in terms of AI, or was

0:09:33.520 --> 0:09:35.320
<v Speaker 7>this something that we all kind of should have seen

0:09:35.400 --> 0:09:37.359
<v Speaker 7>the signs that there was a potential.

0:09:37.040 --> 0:09:41.560
<v Speaker 2>Top Bloomberg's Bailey lip Schultz with big Bailey lip Schultz

0:09:41.600 --> 0:09:43.679
<v Speaker 2>fans here on Bloomberg Tech try saying that in the

0:09:43.720 --> 0:09:46.120
<v Speaker 2>morning without a coffee, thank you very much. So coming

0:09:46.240 --> 0:09:49.319
<v Speaker 2>up AMD and now this is a new agreement with

0:09:49.480 --> 0:09:52.600
<v Speaker 2>Oracle supplying even more AI chips.

0:09:52.640 --> 0:09:55.640
<v Speaker 6>We have the details on that. Next, this is Bloomberg Tech.

0:10:11.520 --> 0:10:15.079
<v Speaker 2>AMD says Oracle is set to deploy fifty thousand of

0:10:15.160 --> 0:10:19.160
<v Speaker 2>their four fifty chips into data center computers starting next year.

0:10:19.360 --> 0:10:22.719
<v Speaker 2>It's the latest commitment in the AI infrastructure frenzy. Here

0:10:22.760 --> 0:10:25.680
<v Speaker 2>with the details BLOOMBOGSI and King who leads our coverage

0:10:25.720 --> 0:10:28.880
<v Speaker 2>of semiconductors. This is an important deal for AMD. It's

0:10:28.880 --> 0:10:30.959
<v Speaker 2>one of the only stocks on the socks that's in

0:10:31.040 --> 0:10:33.880
<v Speaker 2>the green right now, What do we need to know

0:10:34.040 --> 0:10:36.840
<v Speaker 2>about it the specificity of where these chips are going.

0:10:37.280 --> 0:10:39.120
<v Speaker 8>So the first thing to note is that these chips

0:10:39.160 --> 0:10:44.040
<v Speaker 8>don't actually exist. These are new products promised for next year.

0:10:44.440 --> 0:10:47.560
<v Speaker 8>So what this is is another affirmation that AMD has

0:10:47.720 --> 0:10:50.199
<v Speaker 8>a role in the future of this massive build out,

0:10:50.240 --> 0:10:53.280
<v Speaker 8>that it is perhaps more than just an alternative to

0:10:53.400 --> 0:10:56.520
<v Speaker 8>in video, that people are actually looking at it's technology

0:10:56.559 --> 0:10:58.360
<v Speaker 8>and saying, hey, we'll have some of that. We like that,

0:10:58.760 --> 0:11:00.720
<v Speaker 8>We're going to commit at least part of our data

0:11:00.840 --> 0:11:01.719
<v Speaker 8>center build to that.

0:11:02.360 --> 0:11:04.079
<v Speaker 3>And what's interesting is, and it comes hot on the

0:11:04.120 --> 0:11:07.960
<v Speaker 3>heels of course of open AMD teaming up Oracles down

0:11:08.040 --> 0:11:11.240
<v Speaker 3>significantly today they've got AI world upon us. But how

0:11:11.360 --> 0:11:14.760
<v Speaker 3>much are we seeing AMD reap the rewards? How much

0:11:14.880 --> 0:11:17.280
<v Speaker 3>will some of these be built out in data centers

0:11:17.320 --> 0:11:19.079
<v Speaker 3>and the margins be impacted for Oracle here?

0:11:20.240 --> 0:11:22.880
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, I mean we've obviously saw the massive open AI

0:11:22.960 --> 0:11:26.719
<v Speaker 8>announcement with am D another affirmation, a separate affirmation from this,

0:11:27.040 --> 0:11:29.839
<v Speaker 8>that hey, they've got a role. Oracle has been a

0:11:29.880 --> 0:11:36.120
<v Speaker 8>customer of AMD for a while. This gives Oracle more options. Obviously,

0:11:36.640 --> 0:11:41.080
<v Speaker 8>everybody else, including Oracle, is paying most of their money

0:11:41.200 --> 0:11:43.360
<v Speaker 8>to in video right now. The margins are massive, the

0:11:43.400 --> 0:11:45.600
<v Speaker 8>prices are massive, So this creates an alternative.

0:11:45.840 --> 0:11:47.880
<v Speaker 2>Let's go back to what you said about these chips

0:11:47.960 --> 0:11:52.160
<v Speaker 2>don't yet exist. AMD, much like in Vidia, has future

0:11:52.240 --> 0:11:56.199
<v Speaker 2>generations of their GPU that they've designed and announced, but

0:11:56.280 --> 0:11:59.680
<v Speaker 2>they're not yet in production. How do we best understand

0:11:59.760 --> 0:12:03.280
<v Speaker 2>where AMD stands in this market for this lead edge

0:12:03.360 --> 0:12:06.319
<v Speaker 2>accelerator versus it in VideA in the next year or so.

0:12:06.520 --> 0:12:07.880
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, I mean, I think the best way to look

0:12:07.920 --> 0:12:10.520
<v Speaker 8>at it is up until the Open AI announcement, it

0:12:10.600 --> 0:12:14.280
<v Speaker 8>seemed like everybody was kind of AMD curious that they

0:12:14.320 --> 0:12:17.360
<v Speaker 8>were getting, you know, orders which were substantial and bringing

0:12:17.440 --> 0:12:20.400
<v Speaker 8>in a good amount of money for the company, but

0:12:20.559 --> 0:12:22.520
<v Speaker 8>compared to what was on offer, compared to what was

0:12:22.559 --> 0:12:25.400
<v Speaker 8>happening at in video, really nothing. I mean, they were

0:12:25.440 --> 0:12:29.760
<v Speaker 8>the best of follow a group that's following in VideA.

0:12:30.080 --> 0:12:32.520
<v Speaker 8>What we're seeing now is at least the beginnings of

0:12:32.679 --> 0:12:35.320
<v Speaker 8>these kind of volume orders and these future commitments, which

0:12:35.320 --> 0:12:38.280
<v Speaker 8>would imply that they are a serious technology provider.

0:12:38.760 --> 0:12:41.360
<v Speaker 3>In king with always the latest, thank you so much,

0:12:41.880 --> 0:12:46.480
<v Speaker 3>seeking with chips shares a Samsung actually sliding over an

0:12:46.520 --> 0:12:49.720
<v Speaker 3>Asia training hours despite the company reporting its biggest quarterly

0:12:49.840 --> 0:12:53.280
<v Speaker 3>profit or expectations of in more than three years. Here

0:12:53.360 --> 0:12:55.560
<v Speaker 3>to discuss it megs Peter Elstrom, and it's.

0:12:55.480 --> 0:12:57.920
<v Speaker 4>Not about memory and demand for it. But why is

0:12:57.960 --> 0:12:58.840
<v Speaker 4>the stock under pressure?

0:13:00.520 --> 0:13:03.360
<v Speaker 9>Well, Samsung stock has really been on a run this year.

0:13:03.480 --> 0:13:05.520
<v Speaker 9>It's up about seventy five It was up about seventy

0:13:05.520 --> 0:13:08.520
<v Speaker 9>five percent before these earnings came out, So investors are

0:13:08.600 --> 0:13:10.880
<v Speaker 9>taking a bit of profit here on the actual news,

0:13:11.200 --> 0:13:12.640
<v Speaker 9>Samsung's numbers were pretty good.

0:13:12.679 --> 0:13:13.080
<v Speaker 5>This is just.

0:13:13.120 --> 0:13:16.440
<v Speaker 9>Preliminary earnings for them. They just put out revenue numbers

0:13:16.480 --> 0:13:19.120
<v Speaker 9>and then operating profit. Just two numbers so far, and

0:13:19.120 --> 0:13:22.319
<v Speaker 9>their operating profit was the biggest in at least three years.

0:13:22.360 --> 0:13:24.960
<v Speaker 9>It was about eight point five billion dollars. So they

0:13:25.000 --> 0:13:27.719
<v Speaker 9>are making more money. They're gaining some traction on the

0:13:28.000 --> 0:13:31.160
<v Speaker 9>HBM side. These are the memory chips that are paired

0:13:31.200 --> 0:13:33.920
<v Speaker 9>with the accelerators. But you were talking earlier with Bailey

0:13:33.960 --> 0:13:37.560
<v Speaker 9>about some of these tech stocks getting ahead of themselves.

0:13:37.720 --> 0:13:39.800
<v Speaker 9>Samsung is one of those examples, and it'll run up

0:13:39.840 --> 0:13:42.040
<v Speaker 9>quite a bit now. The investors are taking a bit

0:13:42.120 --> 0:13:44.600
<v Speaker 9>of profits, but the numbers look pretty strong. We're going

0:13:44.679 --> 0:13:47.040
<v Speaker 9>to get final earnings from them later on in the month,

0:13:47.280 --> 0:13:49.640
<v Speaker 9>we'll get more detail about exactly how much of this

0:13:49.840 --> 0:13:53.480
<v Speaker 9>is coming from memory chips, the HBM chips in particular,

0:13:53.679 --> 0:13:56.800
<v Speaker 9>how much from smartphones and other kinds of components. Samsung

0:13:56.880 --> 0:14:01.160
<v Speaker 9>in this AI memory chip race has been behind sk Heinix,

0:14:01.200 --> 0:14:03.880
<v Speaker 9>it's local competitor. Eske Henix has been very good at

0:14:04.160 --> 0:14:07.120
<v Speaker 9>working with Nvidia in particular, But now Samsung appears to

0:14:07.160 --> 0:14:09.720
<v Speaker 9>be making some progress. We get more detail on that later,

0:14:09.800 --> 0:14:11.559
<v Speaker 9>but it does look like they're making some progress.

0:14:12.480 --> 0:14:16.560
<v Speaker 2>Pete, you're the editor that leads our coverage of Asian technology,

0:14:16.720 --> 0:14:20.000
<v Speaker 2>right how do we cover Samsung? That's a company that

0:14:20.120 --> 0:14:23.000
<v Speaker 2>has all of these different arms and in the calendar,

0:14:23.760 --> 0:14:27.240
<v Speaker 2>is Samsung the most important Asian technology company right now?

0:14:29.080 --> 0:14:32.760
<v Speaker 9>Well, we've got a big week for tech companies in Asia,

0:14:32.800 --> 0:14:36.600
<v Speaker 9>and particularly chip companies in Asia. TSMC comes later on

0:14:36.680 --> 0:14:39.360
<v Speaker 9>in the week. TSMC, of course makes chips for everybody,

0:14:39.440 --> 0:14:42.680
<v Speaker 9>but particularly they're the ones who actually manufacture those chips

0:14:42.720 --> 0:14:44.600
<v Speaker 9>for Invidio when they go ahead and sell them to

0:14:45.160 --> 0:14:48.120
<v Speaker 9>Open AI and the rest of their customers. So that's

0:14:48.200 --> 0:14:50.400
<v Speaker 9>going to be a biggie. In between, we have ASML

0:14:50.560 --> 0:14:53.760
<v Speaker 9>in Europe, which is another very important company in the

0:14:53.840 --> 0:14:57.320
<v Speaker 9>chip ecosystem because they make the highest end chip equipment

0:14:57.400 --> 0:14:59.760
<v Speaker 9>for manufacturing these high D chips. So both of those

0:14:59.760 --> 0:15:04.440
<v Speaker 9>are to be important indicators. Samsung is very much in there. Recently,

0:15:04.560 --> 0:15:07.760
<v Speaker 9>they've had some struggles as they fell behind sk Heinis

0:15:07.760 --> 0:15:09.880
<v Speaker 9>in the memory chip business. In particular, it looked like

0:15:09.960 --> 0:15:12.600
<v Speaker 9>Heiinis was going to run away with this market. Now,

0:15:12.720 --> 0:15:16.880
<v Speaker 9>Samsung course big company within South Korea, the biggest company historically.

0:15:17.200 --> 0:15:19.360
<v Speaker 9>They've made a lot of progress in terms of catching up,

0:15:19.440 --> 0:15:22.800
<v Speaker 9>so they're important, and together Samsung and Skhinnicks give you

0:15:22.840 --> 0:15:25.680
<v Speaker 9>an indication of how the AI market is doing. So

0:15:25.840 --> 0:15:28.440
<v Speaker 9>both of those companies are partnering with open Ai too.

0:15:28.880 --> 0:15:31.360
<v Speaker 9>As you mentioned earlier, open Ai seems to be partnering

0:15:31.440 --> 0:15:33.920
<v Speaker 9>with everybody. They both have contracts to be able to

0:15:34.000 --> 0:15:37.760
<v Speaker 9>supply those memory chips as open Ai embarks on this

0:15:37.960 --> 0:15:41.280
<v Speaker 9>enormous construction project to build more data centers across the

0:15:41.440 --> 0:15:42.600
<v Speaker 9>US and beyond the US.

0:15:42.760 --> 0:15:45.160
<v Speaker 3>Samsung under pressure and you articulate how far the stock

0:15:45.160 --> 0:15:47.800
<v Speaker 3>has run up recently, But is there any implication from

0:15:47.840 --> 0:15:50.400
<v Speaker 3>the dialing up of geopolitical anxieties and the moment we

0:15:50.520 --> 0:15:53.080
<v Speaker 3>know that China South Korea are getting embroiled from a

0:15:53.120 --> 0:15:56.360
<v Speaker 3>shipping perspective, Peter, is there anything weighing more broadly or

0:15:56.400 --> 0:15:59.120
<v Speaker 3>more is that Samsung will be engulfed and yet further

0:15:59.240 --> 0:16:01.200
<v Speaker 3>tension between South career China and.

0:16:01.320 --> 0:16:05.480
<v Speaker 9>More broadly, there are certainly tensions. I think everybody is

0:16:05.520 --> 0:16:08.560
<v Speaker 9>watching the negotiations between the US and China. We of

0:16:08.600 --> 0:16:11.480
<v Speaker 9>course had that flare up over the weekend where China

0:16:11.640 --> 0:16:15.120
<v Speaker 9>threatened to use their control over the rare earth elements

0:16:16.080 --> 0:16:20.040
<v Speaker 9>in the trade negotiations. President Trump responded by saying, perhaps

0:16:20.080 --> 0:16:22.160
<v Speaker 9>tariffs would go to one hundred percent. I think that

0:16:22.560 --> 0:16:25.760
<v Speaker 9>concerns everybody when it comes to South Korea, in particular

0:16:25.840 --> 0:16:28.080
<v Speaker 9>in Samsung. Samsung is one of the companies that is

0:16:28.120 --> 0:16:31.240
<v Speaker 9>building facilities within the US. They're one of the Chips

0:16:31.280 --> 0:16:34.200
<v Speaker 9>Act beneficiaries, so they're doing construction in the US. They

0:16:34.240 --> 0:16:36.960
<v Speaker 9>plan on adding a lot of capacity here, so as

0:16:37.040 --> 0:16:41.440
<v Speaker 9>the Trump administration pushes for more domestic manufacturing, they seem

0:16:41.520 --> 0:16:43.600
<v Speaker 9>to be one of the beneficiaries at this point.

0:16:43.640 --> 0:16:44.040
<v Speaker 6>At least.

0:16:44.240 --> 0:16:46.120
<v Speaker 9>They of course make these memory chips, which is really

0:16:46.160 --> 0:16:49.240
<v Speaker 9>where they make all of their money. The mobile phone

0:16:49.280 --> 0:16:51.200
<v Speaker 9>business may be a little bit higher profile, but the

0:16:51.280 --> 0:16:54.400
<v Speaker 9>chips business is really where they make the profit. As

0:16:54.480 --> 0:16:56.440
<v Speaker 9>they push ahead with that and they work more with

0:16:56.520 --> 0:16:59.960
<v Speaker 9>TSMC in Nvidia on those memory chips, that should help

0:17:00.080 --> 0:17:02.560
<v Speaker 9>their profits. But in terms of these trade wars, it's

0:17:02.640 --> 0:17:04.560
<v Speaker 9>very important that they continue to build out in the

0:17:04.720 --> 0:17:06.760
<v Speaker 9>US and build up those fabs that they have in

0:17:06.800 --> 0:17:07.200
<v Speaker 9>the US.

0:17:08.680 --> 0:17:12.000
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg's Peter Elstrom on all Things Samsung, Thank you very much.

0:17:12.080 --> 0:17:14.439
<v Speaker 2>Now coming up, we're going to speak with Tonal CEO

0:17:14.840 --> 0:17:19.640
<v Speaker 2>Darren McDonald about the company's retail expassion expansion and it's

0:17:19.720 --> 0:17:22.439
<v Speaker 2>pushed to infuse AI into all of its products.

0:17:22.480 --> 0:17:24.360
<v Speaker 6>That's next. This is Bloomberg Tech.

0:17:31.880 --> 0:17:35.000
<v Speaker 2>Tonal Systems, the maker of at home fitness equipment, says

0:17:35.040 --> 0:17:38.080
<v Speaker 2>it's seen a return to revenue growth fueled by sales

0:17:38.119 --> 0:17:41.480
<v Speaker 2>of its tech infused Tonal two. The company has experienced

0:17:41.520 --> 0:17:45.399
<v Speaker 2>a turbulent few years after pandemic era lockdown's lifted and

0:17:45.480 --> 0:17:48.960
<v Speaker 2>people went back to in person gyms and fitness classes.

0:17:49.040 --> 0:17:51.280
<v Speaker 2>Let's talk more about the company's tund around efforts with

0:17:51.400 --> 0:17:55.879
<v Speaker 2>Tonal CEO Darren McDonald. So there is a strategy now right,

0:17:56.000 --> 0:17:59.639
<v Speaker 2>a different environment to say twenty through twenty twenty two,

0:18:00.440 --> 0:18:03.280
<v Speaker 2>and I'm trying to make sense of what links it all.

0:18:03.600 --> 0:18:05.320
<v Speaker 6>You seem to want to look at the.

0:18:05.320 --> 0:18:09.000
<v Speaker 2>High street a little bit and retail. What is your

0:18:09.040 --> 0:18:09.760
<v Speaker 2>big strategy.

0:18:10.480 --> 0:18:12.520
<v Speaker 10>Well, yeah, just in the past year, we've actually rolled

0:18:12.560 --> 0:18:15.560
<v Speaker 10>out from nineteen locations to over one hundred locations for

0:18:15.640 --> 0:18:17.960
<v Speaker 10>a distribution, so we now we have more places people

0:18:18.000 --> 0:18:20.120
<v Speaker 10>to see and touch and feel a Tonal product, which

0:18:20.200 --> 0:18:23.159
<v Speaker 10>is incredible because we have seventy five percent NPS and

0:18:23.240 --> 0:18:25.879
<v Speaker 10>some of the lowest journ in the category. So giving

0:18:25.920 --> 0:18:28.960
<v Speaker 10>people an opportunity to actually experience this system means that

0:18:29.000 --> 0:18:30.720
<v Speaker 10>people end up buying, and so just we want to

0:18:30.760 --> 0:18:31.480
<v Speaker 10>really focus on that.

0:18:31.760 --> 0:18:34.520
<v Speaker 2>Tonal systems are still higher end and if we learned

0:18:34.560 --> 0:18:37.359
<v Speaker 2>anything from a couple of weeks ago when Peloton had

0:18:37.400 --> 0:18:41.640
<v Speaker 2>its latest change in strategy, people are still very sensitive

0:18:41.720 --> 0:18:42.280
<v Speaker 2>to pricing.

0:18:42.760 --> 0:18:46.399
<v Speaker 6>They want more for less. What's your strategy for pricing?

0:18:47.080 --> 0:18:48.920
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, you know, we feel like we've got the world's

0:18:48.960 --> 0:18:53.160
<v Speaker 10>leading strength training system. It's a personal trainer on your wall.

0:18:53.400 --> 0:18:55.240
<v Speaker 10>It's a full gym. You don't have to think about

0:18:55.280 --> 0:18:57.560
<v Speaker 10>it in the sense that we personalize all the weights

0:18:57.600 --> 0:18:59.800
<v Speaker 10>for you. So there isn't anything out there in the

0:19:00.119 --> 0:19:02.720
<v Speaker 10>market like what we do. So the fact that we

0:19:02.760 --> 0:19:06.320
<v Speaker 10>can personalize the workout. We can adjust weights in real time.

0:19:06.760 --> 0:19:08.800
<v Speaker 10>We'll move weights up by one pound or decrease it

0:19:08.880 --> 0:19:10.879
<v Speaker 10>by one pound if you're not doing well, and you

0:19:10.960 --> 0:19:13.240
<v Speaker 10>don't have to think about it at all. And from

0:19:13.240 --> 0:19:16.080
<v Speaker 10>our perspective, because of our platform, the way it's built,

0:19:16.119 --> 0:19:19.440
<v Speaker 10>which sits on top of AI, it's not just entertaining you.

0:19:19.600 --> 0:19:22.560
<v Speaker 10>It's really a strength training system that works with you, and.

0:19:22.680 --> 0:19:25.800
<v Speaker 3>You are offering more to those who already have one

0:19:25.920 --> 0:19:29.080
<v Speaker 3>with reformer pilates options being built in Darren and unfolded.

0:19:29.119 --> 0:19:32.119
<v Speaker 3>But I'm interested in the artificial intelligence part of it

0:19:32.240 --> 0:19:35.080
<v Speaker 3>that has been being baked into everyday workouts on the Tonal.

0:19:35.240 --> 0:19:36.040
<v Speaker 4>How are you embracing it?

0:19:37.320 --> 0:19:40.000
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, Well, as you said, Carolyn, we're super excited today

0:19:40.080 --> 0:19:42.440
<v Speaker 10>to announce the fact that we're working with christ McGee

0:19:42.880 --> 0:19:46.760
<v Speaker 10>and we're announcing our PLATES system. You know what's really

0:19:46.800 --> 0:19:48.479
<v Speaker 10>great about it is that what we see on our

0:19:48.480 --> 0:19:50.760
<v Speaker 10>platform is that almost two thirds of our members are

0:19:50.840 --> 0:19:53.639
<v Speaker 10>interested in pilates, but only seventeen percent of them are

0:19:53.680 --> 0:19:56.200
<v Speaker 10>actually doing it. And the reason for that is pretty clear.

0:19:56.320 --> 0:19:59.640
<v Speaker 10>You know, we've got people who have difficulty getting into classes,

0:20:00.000 --> 0:20:03.000
<v Speaker 10>they're inaccessible. You have to drive to them. The classes

0:20:03.080 --> 0:20:06.359
<v Speaker 10>are often difficult to find, and so we rolled that

0:20:06.520 --> 0:20:10.560
<v Speaker 10>out on our Tonal system. We have force curves that

0:20:10.600 --> 0:20:12.639
<v Speaker 10>are very similar to what a reformer looks like, so

0:20:12.720 --> 0:20:15.720
<v Speaker 10>as you move further away from from the machine, it

0:20:15.840 --> 0:20:19.320
<v Speaker 10>actually increases in resistance as well. It's really unlike anything

0:20:19.400 --> 0:20:22.120
<v Speaker 10>that's ever been offered out there. So now a greater

0:20:22.240 --> 0:20:25.240
<v Speaker 10>part of our community is able to actually interact with

0:20:25.320 --> 0:20:27.560
<v Speaker 10>something like pilates. And so you add that to strength,

0:20:27.960 --> 0:20:30.480
<v Speaker 10>you add that to yoga, you add that to the

0:20:30.640 --> 0:20:33.280
<v Speaker 10>cardio work that we do. And so to answer your

0:20:33.359 --> 0:20:35.720
<v Speaker 10>question around the AI component of it, we think we

0:20:35.760 --> 0:20:39.520
<v Speaker 10>have the world's largest strength database. So we have nearly

0:20:39.560 --> 0:20:43.399
<v Speaker 10>three hundred thousand members lifting nearly three hundred billion pounds.

0:20:43.760 --> 0:20:46.760
<v Speaker 10>It's a tremendous data set. So as we learn about

0:20:46.800 --> 0:20:48.919
<v Speaker 10>you and who you are, we can look at our

0:20:48.960 --> 0:20:51.160
<v Speaker 10>cables and say, you know, somebody is lifting a certain

0:20:51.200 --> 0:20:53.560
<v Speaker 10>amount of weight, a certain amount of reps, forced velosophy,

0:20:53.640 --> 0:20:56.080
<v Speaker 10>range of motion, all of those things which helps us

0:20:56.160 --> 0:20:58.560
<v Speaker 10>to define what outcomes could look like for somebody. So

0:20:58.680 --> 0:21:01.199
<v Speaker 10>people get stronger on Tonal than any other system.

0:21:01.720 --> 0:21:02.879
<v Speaker 4>It is a premium offering.

0:21:03.480 --> 0:21:07.119
<v Speaker 3>Would you ever think about having cheaper offerings or just

0:21:07.200 --> 0:21:09.320
<v Speaker 3>the application as we've seen with Palatin for example.

0:21:10.840 --> 0:21:12.840
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, we don't have anything to announce today, but we're

0:21:12.840 --> 0:21:16.560
<v Speaker 10>certainly looking at alternative opportunities for our hardware. I mean,

0:21:16.600 --> 0:21:19.120
<v Speaker 10>we could move upstream, we could move downstream, but again

0:21:19.160 --> 0:21:21.560
<v Speaker 10>I would just refer back to the fact that nobody

0:21:21.640 --> 0:21:23.399
<v Speaker 10>has anything quite like what we have.

0:21:23.840 --> 0:21:25.560
<v Speaker 2>Just very quick before we let you go. You know

0:21:25.640 --> 0:21:28.200
<v Speaker 2>you've raised money in the past. Would you raise money

0:21:28.359 --> 0:21:30.760
<v Speaker 2>just to keep growth going or what would the rationale be?

0:21:31.560 --> 0:21:31.800
<v Speaker 1>Sure?

0:21:31.880 --> 0:21:34.000
<v Speaker 10>I mean, we're always looking at fuel growth, so you know,

0:21:34.080 --> 0:21:37.080
<v Speaker 10>in terms of developing new hardware, in terms of acquiring

0:21:37.119 --> 0:21:40.120
<v Speaker 10>new customers, expanding any new modalities. As we're announcing today,

0:21:40.440 --> 0:21:42.760
<v Speaker 10>we think there's an opportunity for us to keep.

0:21:42.640 --> 0:21:45.520
<v Speaker 4>That going, keep that going. We really appreciate it.

0:21:45.600 --> 0:21:49.199
<v Speaker 3>Darren McDonald, CEO of Tonal, on the latest announcement when

0:21:49.240 --> 0:21:52.359
<v Speaker 3>it comes to reformer plates and the growth story. But

0:21:52.480 --> 0:21:54.280
<v Speaker 3>coming up and we've got so much more to discuss

0:21:54.320 --> 0:21:57.760
<v Speaker 3>when it comes to Salesforce. As Dreamforce Conference kicks off today,

0:21:57.840 --> 0:21:59.359
<v Speaker 3>we're going to speak of may have be a writer.

0:22:00.200 --> 0:22:02.000
<v Speaker 4>Sanezuski of eleven Labs.

0:22:02.040 --> 0:22:03.879
<v Speaker 3>This is all about the integration of AI and the

0:22:03.920 --> 0:22:07.320
<v Speaker 3>future of enterprise software. Basically today, the key question is

0:22:07.800 --> 0:22:10.160
<v Speaker 3>in what are we in an AI bubble? How much

0:22:10.320 --> 0:22:14.240
<v Speaker 3>therefore are we seeing a return on AI investment in

0:22:14.400 --> 0:22:15.120
<v Speaker 3>the enterprise.

0:22:15.520 --> 0:22:17.159
<v Speaker 4>Look at what the impact though is of China or

0:22:17.200 --> 0:22:17.920
<v Speaker 4>the US as well.

0:22:18.640 --> 0:22:20.399
<v Speaker 2>Funny day in the market, So we're down about a

0:22:20.400 --> 0:22:23.400
<v Speaker 2>percentage point on the Nazak one hundred. I'm still recovering

0:22:23.440 --> 0:22:25.840
<v Speaker 2>from Friday where the President broke that news at the

0:22:25.880 --> 0:22:28.520
<v Speaker 2>top of our show and then markets went into free fall.

0:22:28.600 --> 0:22:32.159
<v Speaker 2>But the blanket theme is the same anxiety about trade

0:22:32.560 --> 0:22:35.520
<v Speaker 2>and unknowns about the relationship between the United States and China,

0:22:35.920 --> 0:22:41.000
<v Speaker 2>particularly in the context of technology. The outlier AMD doing

0:22:41.080 --> 0:22:56.160
<v Speaker 2>deals over the place. This is Bloomberg Tech. Welcome back

0:22:56.200 --> 0:22:58.239
<v Speaker 2>to Bloomberg Tech. I'm looking at the markets and here

0:22:58.280 --> 0:22:59.879
<v Speaker 2>are some technology stories we haven't got to.

0:23:00.119 --> 0:23:02.920
<v Speaker 6>Yeah. The first is Walmart are almost three percent. What

0:23:03.000 --> 0:23:03.639
<v Speaker 6>do you think it is.

0:23:04.359 --> 0:23:07.720
<v Speaker 2>It's a relationship with open AI, an API integration into

0:23:07.800 --> 0:23:10.920
<v Speaker 2>chat gpt sending the stock high. Just like we saw

0:23:10.960 --> 0:23:13.200
<v Speaker 2>with the number of names that Open AI dev day.

0:23:13.600 --> 0:23:16.000
<v Speaker 2>Walmart is the latest to do a deal in the

0:23:16.040 --> 0:23:19.800
<v Speaker 2>e commerce context to integration in chat GPT also the

0:23:19.920 --> 0:23:22.920
<v Speaker 2>chip sector, so we talked about AMD AMD's PAED some

0:23:23.040 --> 0:23:25.600
<v Speaker 2>of its gain relating to the Oracle deal, which Inking

0:23:25.680 --> 0:23:28.840
<v Speaker 2>explained to us is separate from that open AI arrangement.

0:23:29.480 --> 0:23:32.280
<v Speaker 2>On the downside, is in video down three point six percent.

0:23:32.440 --> 0:23:35.120
<v Speaker 2>It fell in recent days because of the tensions with China.

0:23:35.240 --> 0:23:38.520
<v Speaker 2>I don't really see a specific piece of news or

0:23:38.600 --> 0:23:41.720
<v Speaker 2>a catalyst that's driving this down lower. There was, of

0:23:41.840 --> 0:23:46.160
<v Speaker 2>course the broad coom an open AIA six news of yesterday.

0:23:46.520 --> 0:23:49.120
<v Speaker 2>They're all names we track because they're moving the markets.

0:23:49.280 --> 0:23:50.240
<v Speaker 2>Carac Can, let's.

0:23:50.080 --> 0:23:51.960
<v Speaker 3>Talk about the moves in the market just of late,

0:23:52.000 --> 0:23:55.000
<v Speaker 3>in the valuations that they're at ed because global fund

0:23:55.040 --> 0:23:58.120
<v Speaker 3>managers they are sounding the alarm bells on AI stocks

0:23:58.320 --> 0:24:00.680
<v Speaker 3>with a record share more than off, saying they're in

0:24:00.760 --> 0:24:02.760
<v Speaker 3>a bubble. It's all according to the survey by Bank

0:24:02.800 --> 0:24:06.479
<v Speaker 3>of America. Meanwhile, City Group CFO Mark Mason also out

0:24:06.520 --> 0:24:08.679
<v Speaker 3>with a warning when questioned by analyst, saying that there

0:24:08.760 --> 0:24:11.720
<v Speaker 3>is signs of frothiness in AI valuations, a sketch to

0:24:11.720 --> 0:24:13.760
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg E Secritaris report around Vastelica.

0:24:14.160 --> 0:24:16.360
<v Speaker 4>I mean the noise is becoming deafening.

0:24:17.840 --> 0:24:21.720
<v Speaker 11>Absolutely, we have heard almost daily warnings from people about

0:24:22.160 --> 0:24:25.840
<v Speaker 11>overevaluation in AI stock, some kind of bubble brewing concerns

0:24:25.880 --> 0:24:28.560
<v Speaker 11>about sort of the circular nature of some of these

0:24:28.640 --> 0:24:32.040
<v Speaker 11>financing deals, a lack of detail that people want. Yeah,

0:24:32.160 --> 0:24:35.200
<v Speaker 11>certainly there is a growing, growing concern, although I also

0:24:35.280 --> 0:24:37.920
<v Speaker 11>would say there continues to be a lot of optimism

0:24:38.040 --> 0:24:41.200
<v Speaker 11>about the long term path of AI, the long term

0:24:41.280 --> 0:24:44.879
<v Speaker 11>productivity enhancements it is expected to deliver. There's still a

0:24:44.960 --> 0:24:47.960
<v Speaker 11>lot of optimism that these companies will eventually see some

0:24:48.119 --> 0:24:50.880
<v Speaker 11>pretty amazing returns from all the investments they're making.

0:24:51.000 --> 0:24:53.239
<v Speaker 6>So certainly a lot of balls, but also a lot

0:24:53.280 --> 0:24:53.679
<v Speaker 6>of bears.

0:24:55.480 --> 0:24:57.760
<v Speaker 2>Right, there's a lot of headlines around Salesforce on the

0:24:57.840 --> 0:25:02.040
<v Speaker 2>terminal today, many positive, but the stock's down almost two percent.

0:25:02.160 --> 0:25:04.520
<v Speaker 2>One I see that you filled with the team is

0:25:04.600 --> 0:25:06.960
<v Speaker 2>that Salesforce has been cut at Northland.

0:25:07.200 --> 0:25:08.240
<v Speaker 6>What's that analyst saying.

0:25:09.400 --> 0:25:12.080
<v Speaker 11>I believe he was discussing a lack of real growth

0:25:12.119 --> 0:25:15.760
<v Speaker 11>acceleration from his agent force AI product. He's not seeing

0:25:15.840 --> 0:25:19.480
<v Speaker 11>it showing up and CRPO that's current remaining performance obligations.

0:25:19.520 --> 0:25:22.560
<v Speaker 11>He's not seeing it show up an average revenue per user. Now,

0:25:22.760 --> 0:25:25.640
<v Speaker 11>Salesforce does have its agent Force event today. I haven't

0:25:25.640 --> 0:25:28.080
<v Speaker 11>been able to monitor it, so we are hoping to

0:25:28.119 --> 0:25:31.159
<v Speaker 11>see some new details maybe about adoption. If they give

0:25:31.240 --> 0:25:34.200
<v Speaker 11>any kind of insight into how much of revenue growth

0:25:34.240 --> 0:25:36.640
<v Speaker 11>they're seeing from this overall adoption rates, I mean, that's

0:25:36.640 --> 0:25:38.520
<v Speaker 11>all going to be very critical for the stock or

0:25:38.560 --> 0:25:40.320
<v Speaker 11>this is one of those software companies that has really

0:25:40.359 --> 0:25:43.800
<v Speaker 11>been struggling this year. Even amid all the AI optimism,

0:25:43.920 --> 0:25:45.720
<v Speaker 11>there are a lot of software companies that have really

0:25:45.720 --> 0:25:49.080
<v Speaker 11>been sort of struggling against a perception that maybe AI

0:25:49.280 --> 0:25:52.600
<v Speaker 11>native companies, notably Open AI, are these companies going to

0:25:52.680 --> 0:25:55.080
<v Speaker 11>really represent some kind of competition to them that's very

0:25:55.119 --> 0:25:57.919
<v Speaker 11>difficult to shake. So people looking to this event today

0:25:58.560 --> 0:26:01.080
<v Speaker 11>really has an opportunity to help counter that narrative.

0:26:02.000 --> 0:26:04.320
<v Speaker 6>With most Ryan for Stelica, thank you very much.

0:26:04.440 --> 0:26:07.440
<v Speaker 2>Now, as Wall Street debates whether AI stocks are heading

0:26:07.520 --> 0:26:11.879
<v Speaker 2>into bubble territory, Salesforce is doubling down on the technology.

0:26:12.280 --> 0:26:16.000
<v Speaker 2>Dreamforce twenty twenty five kicks off today, bringing together celebrities

0:26:16.359 --> 0:26:19.280
<v Speaker 2>and tech leaders to explore the future of AI in

0:26:19.320 --> 0:26:22.360
<v Speaker 2>the world of enterprise. Among the featured speakers Eleven Lab

0:26:22.480 --> 0:26:26.960
<v Speaker 2>CEO Matti Stanzewski and Writer CEO Mayhbib who will appear

0:26:27.040 --> 0:26:31.840
<v Speaker 2>together on a panel titled Rewriting the Enterprise Playbook with AI,

0:26:32.440 --> 0:26:34.119
<v Speaker 2>Please to say they both joined us now here in

0:26:34.160 --> 0:26:34.760
<v Speaker 2>San Francisco.

0:26:34.840 --> 0:26:36.720
<v Speaker 6>May I start with you. You heard what Ryan just said.

0:26:37.280 --> 0:26:43.159
<v Speaker 2>I know writer to be an LLM focus company AGENTICAI

0:26:43.280 --> 0:26:48.399
<v Speaker 2>focus company for the enterprise. Either you beat Salesforce at

0:26:48.440 --> 0:26:50.280
<v Speaker 2>that or you work with them at that.

0:26:50.560 --> 0:26:51.040
<v Speaker 6>Which is it?

0:26:51.720 --> 0:26:55.800
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, what we do is help companies rewire operations to

0:26:55.880 --> 0:26:59.560
<v Speaker 12>be AI native, and so partnerships with companies like Salesforce

0:26:59.640 --> 0:27:02.040
<v Speaker 12>are really important part of that. So it's definitely the

0:27:02.119 --> 0:27:05.359
<v Speaker 12>partnership angle. But there is something to be said around

0:27:05.600 --> 0:27:08.600
<v Speaker 12>doing things AI native and being able to start with

0:27:08.680 --> 0:27:11.520
<v Speaker 12>a blank sheet of paper versus you know, layering on

0:27:11.680 --> 0:27:14.960
<v Speaker 12>AGENTIC into a system of record that has existed for

0:27:15.040 --> 0:27:15.359
<v Speaker 12>a while.

0:27:15.800 --> 0:27:17.280
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, you've kind of wanted to build it from the

0:27:17.320 --> 0:27:17.800
<v Speaker 4>ground up.

0:27:17.880 --> 0:27:18.000
<v Speaker 5>May.

0:27:18.119 --> 0:27:20.360
<v Speaker 4>But I turn therefore to Matty. And when you're thinking.

0:27:20.160 --> 0:27:23.080
<v Speaker 3>About the audio applications of artificial intelligence, we've had you

0:27:23.160 --> 0:27:25.280
<v Speaker 3>on the show to think about how now music can

0:27:25.359 --> 0:27:28.800
<v Speaker 3>be created by just writing in a few key prompts.

0:27:29.200 --> 0:27:34.359
<v Speaker 3>How are companies adopting eleven labs appropriately with a return

0:27:34.480 --> 0:27:35.320
<v Speaker 3>on that investment.

0:27:35.480 --> 0:27:37.280
<v Speaker 4>Is it with a salesforce or is it from the

0:27:37.359 --> 0:27:37.920
<v Speaker 4>ground up.

0:27:39.400 --> 0:27:42.800
<v Speaker 13>Carline. Thanks for having me here. We've seen an incredible

0:27:42.800 --> 0:27:46.960
<v Speaker 13>shift over last year where the combination of voice and

0:27:47.000 --> 0:27:50.639
<v Speaker 13>conversational agents can elevate a customer experience for customers that

0:27:50.760 --> 0:27:52.480
<v Speaker 13>I was Fortune five hundred all the way to to

0:27:52.560 --> 0:27:55.880
<v Speaker 13>some of them highest scaling startups. We've seen boff. We've

0:27:55.920 --> 0:27:58.920
<v Speaker 13>seen companies built using some of the best and read

0:27:59.280 --> 0:28:02.520
<v Speaker 13>technologies including voice, like you said, all relying on the

0:28:02.680 --> 0:28:06.000
<v Speaker 13>entirety of the platform. We are thrilled to be here

0:28:06.040 --> 0:28:08.800
<v Speaker 13>at Dreamforce and as part of the work we do

0:28:09.840 --> 0:28:13.760
<v Speaker 13>be part of the voice for Agent force empowering that

0:28:14.320 --> 0:28:18.240
<v Speaker 13>work across their platform. So we've seen both and in

0:28:18.320 --> 0:28:21.240
<v Speaker 13>across the enterprise segment quick adoption in that sector.

0:28:21.760 --> 0:28:22.480
<v Speaker 4>May we have.

0:28:22.640 --> 0:28:26.000
<v Speaker 3>Loved how outspoken and clear you've been and pushing back home.

0:28:26.680 --> 0:28:29.960
<v Speaker 3>Perhaps these narratives of ninety five percent of all AI

0:28:30.119 --> 0:28:32.280
<v Speaker 3>pilots aren't working when we think about the a MIT

0:28:32.440 --> 0:28:34.080
<v Speaker 3>report that really rocked the market.

0:28:34.400 --> 0:28:36.320
<v Speaker 4>But it's about nuance in this conversation.

0:28:36.440 --> 0:28:38.840
<v Speaker 3>May so bring us that nuance of when is it

0:28:39.000 --> 0:28:41.360
<v Speaker 3>working when they're adopting writer either from the ground up

0:28:41.440 --> 0:28:43.280
<v Speaker 3>or indeed within salesforce offerings.

0:28:44.440 --> 0:28:47.920
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, AI is not another software upgrade. You can't outsource

0:28:48.000 --> 0:28:50.640
<v Speaker 12>it to the CIO and expect results. You know, a

0:28:50.680 --> 0:28:52.800
<v Speaker 12>lot of what we do is go to executives and

0:28:52.920 --> 0:28:55.840
<v Speaker 12>CEOs and say, look, this is about you. Sometimes you

0:28:55.920 --> 0:28:57.560
<v Speaker 12>kind of want to shake them, like this has got

0:28:57.640 --> 0:29:01.400
<v Speaker 12>to be a top down, very heavy mandate to rewire

0:29:01.520 --> 0:29:04.680
<v Speaker 12>processes end to end. If you leave it up to people,

0:29:04.920 --> 0:29:06.680
<v Speaker 12>a lot of what they're going to be doing is

0:29:07.120 --> 0:29:10.720
<v Speaker 12>personal productivity stuff with AI versus the high leverage things

0:29:10.960 --> 0:29:13.520
<v Speaker 12>that executives certainly want. And as you've seen in terms

0:29:13.560 --> 0:29:16.160
<v Speaker 12>of what the market wants and this continued investment in AI,

0:29:16.560 --> 0:29:18.720
<v Speaker 12>what people are expecting from this enterprise.

0:29:18.480 --> 0:29:21.480
<v Speaker 2>Investment, Matty, what you and may have in common as

0:29:21.520 --> 0:29:24.600
<v Speaker 2>your private companies. You're free from the scrutiny that public

0:29:24.680 --> 0:29:27.400
<v Speaker 2>companies are. But in the last segment we talked about

0:29:27.480 --> 0:29:33.520
<v Speaker 2>how some of the analysts that cover salesforce are skeptical about.

0:29:34.840 --> 0:29:36.360
<v Speaker 6>Agent force. In particular.

0:29:37.040 --> 0:29:39.160
<v Speaker 2>You've just said to us, both of you, we actually

0:29:39.240 --> 0:29:43.080
<v Speaker 2>do see adoption in the enterprise. So what does that

0:29:43.280 --> 0:29:46.720
<v Speaker 2>tell you if the data for their products specifically isn't

0:29:46.760 --> 0:29:47.200
<v Speaker 2>as strong.

0:29:48.920 --> 0:29:52.680
<v Speaker 13>Look, our focus is predominantly on working across our work

0:29:52.720 --> 0:29:56.680
<v Speaker 13>at eleven laps, and we've seen use cases across e

0:29:56.800 --> 0:30:00.720
<v Speaker 13>commerce elevate where you suddenly can and not only have

0:30:00.800 --> 0:30:04.640
<v Speaker 13>customer supporting and customer experience, where users going into the product,

0:30:04.680 --> 0:30:07.800
<v Speaker 13>going into the site will be able to interactive agents

0:30:07.840 --> 0:30:10.400
<v Speaker 13>to help you shop through the product all the way

0:30:10.400 --> 0:30:13.040
<v Speaker 13>from the start. It's a good company and Mobilaria one

0:30:13.080 --> 0:30:15.600
<v Speaker 13>of the biggest in Italy working on use cases like this,

0:30:16.240 --> 0:30:19.840
<v Speaker 13>and we've seen this scale across across wider degree of

0:30:20.080 --> 0:30:25.120
<v Speaker 13>segments and financial services and technology and healthcare. What I

0:30:25.160 --> 0:30:28.640
<v Speaker 13>think is true and key as you think about salesforce

0:30:29.760 --> 0:30:34.680
<v Speaker 13>their distribution across clients, of course stretches all types of

0:30:34.760 --> 0:30:38.480
<v Speaker 13>industries and including regulated industries, so it will take a

0:30:38.560 --> 0:30:41.240
<v Speaker 13>slightly longer time to bring a little bit of technology

0:30:41.280 --> 0:30:45.800
<v Speaker 13>into those industries where where additional deployment additional integrations to

0:30:46.080 --> 0:30:49.040
<v Speaker 13>existing stock are slightly more complex to some of the

0:30:49.120 --> 0:30:50.520
<v Speaker 13>companies in the space.

0:30:50.720 --> 0:30:53.600
<v Speaker 2>May when you're both on stage with each other later today,

0:30:54.080 --> 0:30:55.880
<v Speaker 2>what's kind of the one key thing you want to

0:30:55.880 --> 0:30:59.200
<v Speaker 2>get across about what is happening among your enterprise customers

0:30:59.200 --> 0:31:01.840
<v Speaker 2>at the moment, fighting with each day or what you're

0:31:02.280 --> 0:31:02.960
<v Speaker 2>most focused on.

0:31:03.200 --> 0:31:06.040
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, this is we're hosts of Salesforce, right, they are

0:31:06.160 --> 0:31:08.160
<v Speaker 12>wonderful partners, and I think a big part of what

0:31:08.280 --> 0:31:10.920
<v Speaker 12>we want to impart to that audience is how do

0:31:11.000 --> 0:31:13.880
<v Speaker 12>you make the most out of your data investment with

0:31:14.160 --> 0:31:16.280
<v Speaker 12>agentic AI, and I think both of us have got

0:31:16.360 --> 0:31:20.000
<v Speaker 12>companies where enterprises are getting real ROI right from our

0:31:20.080 --> 0:31:23.280
<v Speaker 12>products and really helping bring that to the data they've

0:31:23.280 --> 0:31:25.520
<v Speaker 12>got in the salesforce ecosystems is going to be one

0:31:25.520 --> 0:31:26.440
<v Speaker 12>of the things we talk about.

0:31:27.680 --> 0:31:32.920
<v Speaker 3>What's so interesting, really, Mattie, has been the ongoing anxiety

0:31:33.040 --> 0:31:37.720
<v Speaker 3>among that enterprise workforce about whether they're being augmented or

0:31:37.760 --> 0:31:40.560
<v Speaker 3>whether indeed they're being replaced. How have you continued to

0:31:40.640 --> 0:31:43.120
<v Speaker 3>try and tell that story, particularly when you're in the

0:31:43.160 --> 0:31:48.480
<v Speaker 3>world of music, of IP of real individuality and creativity.

0:31:50.520 --> 0:31:53.040
<v Speaker 13>For us, it's extremely important to work with the industry together.

0:31:53.120 --> 0:31:56.360
<v Speaker 13>So our music is the first fully licensed AI music

0:31:56.440 --> 0:32:00.600
<v Speaker 13>model at incredible quality working with our research theme, and

0:32:00.680 --> 0:32:03.560
<v Speaker 13>that's the approach we've taken across voice, across music, across

0:32:03.640 --> 0:32:06.520
<v Speaker 13>as we build conversational agents. But like you say, AI

0:32:06.760 --> 0:32:09.120
<v Speaker 13>is bringing change in the way that we've seen this

0:32:09.320 --> 0:32:12.720
<v Speaker 13>across enterprise, across the companies we work with, is people

0:32:12.960 --> 0:32:16.600
<v Speaker 13>using AI will be the people that will unfortunately, where

0:32:16.600 --> 0:32:19.320
<v Speaker 13>there's people not using AI, so that adoption both and

0:32:19.360 --> 0:32:22.960
<v Speaker 13>the enterprise setting and across the wider global setting. It's

0:32:23.040 --> 0:32:26.680
<v Speaker 13>all about being the user, trying it out and bringing.

0:32:26.440 --> 0:32:29.200
<v Speaker 4>That to your work and may when you come on.

0:32:29.360 --> 0:32:32.160
<v Speaker 3>We've always been very keen to ask you about your

0:32:32.280 --> 0:32:35.040
<v Speaker 3>growth trajectory, but also the haves and the have nots

0:32:35.080 --> 0:32:38.600
<v Speaker 3>in the space. How much you still having companies, smaller

0:32:38.640 --> 0:32:40.520
<v Speaker 3>companies call you up saying, hey, we'd like to team

0:32:40.560 --> 0:32:42.040
<v Speaker 3>with you, we'd like to offer you, we'd like to

0:32:42.120 --> 0:32:44.240
<v Speaker 3>have some sort of buy out. Are you seeing that

0:32:44.440 --> 0:32:47.280
<v Speaker 3>coming from vcs just being more discerning, putting money for

0:32:47.360 --> 0:32:49.920
<v Speaker 3>the winners, but taking away from those that aren't hitting scale.

0:32:51.320 --> 0:32:56.040
<v Speaker 12>The bar for sharp differentiation has never been harder. I

0:32:56.120 --> 0:32:59.239
<v Speaker 12>think with the hyperscalers just flooding the zone, it has

0:32:59.320 --> 0:33:01.880
<v Speaker 12>been so such a challenge to make sure the enterprise

0:33:02.040 --> 0:33:05.040
<v Speaker 12>understands what's real, what's what, and I think that's just

0:33:05.200 --> 0:33:09.080
<v Speaker 12>getting harder for smaller startups to enter the enterprise as

0:33:09.120 --> 0:33:11.240
<v Speaker 12>a result. You know, we were lucky in that we

0:33:11.360 --> 0:33:14.520
<v Speaker 12>started building LLLMS for the enterprise five years ago, and

0:33:14.600 --> 0:33:18.360
<v Speaker 12>so a lot of our longstanding relationships, you know, have

0:33:18.960 --> 0:33:21.840
<v Speaker 12>been a result of why we land new customers in

0:33:22.280 --> 0:33:24.720
<v Speaker 12>these spaces. And I think that is just getting harder

0:33:24.800 --> 0:33:29.960
<v Speaker 12>because of the hyperscaler investment. But there's just so many categories.

0:33:30.000 --> 0:33:33.280
<v Speaker 12>The enterprise needs so much help, and people are not

0:33:33.440 --> 0:33:35.480
<v Speaker 12>focused on it the way that startups can. So still

0:33:35.520 --> 0:33:38.560
<v Speaker 12>a ton of opportunity, but yeah, absolutely getting harder, and.

0:33:38.640 --> 0:33:40.480
<v Speaker 4>We love having both of you on to talk about

0:33:40.520 --> 0:33:41.200
<v Speaker 4>that opportunity.

0:33:41.240 --> 0:33:43.640
<v Speaker 3>We're excited to hear from you at SOLS full Streamforce

0:33:43.680 --> 0:33:46.800
<v Speaker 3>as well. A little bit later Mayhabe as well, Mattie Stetazuski.

0:33:46.840 --> 0:33:47.520
<v Speaker 4>We appreciate you.

0:33:47.840 --> 0:33:48.160
<v Speaker 1>Of course.

0:33:48.200 --> 0:33:50.320
<v Speaker 4>Of Writer and eleven Labs coming up.

0:33:51.160 --> 0:33:54.200
<v Speaker 3>Tara Hopkins, Global Director of Policy of Instagram joins us

0:33:54.240 --> 0:33:57.040
<v Speaker 3>to talk about the company's new PG thirteen content restrictions

0:33:57.080 --> 0:33:57.800
<v Speaker 3>for team users.

0:33:58.080 --> 0:33:59.880
<v Speaker 4>That's next. This is a really big tech.

0:34:13.880 --> 0:34:18.080
<v Speaker 3>Instagram will prevent teens from seeing content deemed inappropriate for

0:34:18.200 --> 0:34:22.000
<v Speaker 3>PG thirteen audiences. Is a new move following Instagram's launch

0:34:22.000 --> 0:34:23.200
<v Speaker 3>of teen accounts last.

0:34:23.080 --> 0:34:26.600
<v Speaker 4>Fall, and that already offers stricter settings.

0:34:26.320 --> 0:34:28.680
<v Speaker 3>And comes as its parent company meta and indeed the

0:34:28.719 --> 0:34:31.480
<v Speaker 3>wider social media industry really battle the narrative that they

0:34:31.560 --> 0:34:33.200
<v Speaker 3>expose young people to dangerous content.

0:34:33.520 --> 0:34:34.520
<v Speaker 4>So let's get the details.

0:34:34.600 --> 0:34:37.480
<v Speaker 3>Instagram's global director of Policy, Tyo Hopkins, and pleased to

0:34:37.520 --> 0:34:39.680
<v Speaker 3>say us here, and I think it's worth in a

0:34:39.800 --> 0:34:43.320
<v Speaker 3>nutshell explaining what TIN accounts now provide. You've added on

0:34:43.480 --> 0:34:47.520
<v Speaker 3>new updates today, how are we restricting content so.

0:34:47.640 --> 0:34:49.440
<v Speaker 14>Cale and as you said, just to take a step back,

0:34:49.560 --> 0:34:52.320
<v Speaker 14>we launched tin Accounts in the US and now globally.

0:34:53.080 --> 0:34:55.799
<v Speaker 14>Last year. Tin Accounts was to address that three things

0:34:55.840 --> 0:34:58.279
<v Speaker 14>that parents were most concerned about about their young people

0:34:58.400 --> 0:35:01.920
<v Speaker 14>using Instagram was about unwanted contact, it was about the

0:35:02.000 --> 0:35:03.880
<v Speaker 14>time they're spending on our app, and it was about

0:35:04.160 --> 0:35:07.560
<v Speaker 14>inappropriate content and minimizing the amount of inappropriate content a

0:35:07.640 --> 0:35:10.680
<v Speaker 14>teen would see on Instagram. What the update is today

0:35:10.880 --> 0:35:13.759
<v Speaker 14>is specifically about that inappropriate content piece of this, because

0:35:13.800 --> 0:35:16.080
<v Speaker 14>we're continually learning from parents and what they told us

0:35:16.280 --> 0:35:18.200
<v Speaker 14>was they were a little bit confused about the different

0:35:18.239 --> 0:35:20.239
<v Speaker 14>settings and the different controls. They were a little bit

0:35:20.320 --> 0:35:23.160
<v Speaker 14>confused about when we talk about what is age appropriate

0:35:23.239 --> 0:35:26.040
<v Speaker 14>or how we age gate and that kind of tech

0:35:26.120 --> 0:35:28.040
<v Speaker 14>speak that a lot of parents just don't really understand.

0:35:28.160 --> 0:35:31.600
<v Speaker 14>So what we've done is we've revammed teen accounts to

0:35:31.760 --> 0:35:35.360
<v Speaker 14>be guided by PG thirteen movie ratings, really trying to

0:35:35.400 --> 0:35:38.120
<v Speaker 14>speak the language of parents who are much more familiar

0:35:38.239 --> 0:35:42.280
<v Speaker 14>with the movie rating movie rating standards. And as of today,

0:35:42.360 --> 0:35:44.879
<v Speaker 14>it's going to be rolling out to all teenagers under

0:35:44.880 --> 0:35:47.560
<v Speaker 14>the age of eighteen who are defaulted into this, so

0:35:47.760 --> 0:35:49.600
<v Speaker 14>they can't opt in or opt out. We're going to

0:35:49.640 --> 0:35:51.960
<v Speaker 14>be moving them into a teen account experience over the

0:35:52.040 --> 0:35:53.040
<v Speaker 14>course in the next few months.

0:35:53.480 --> 0:35:57.040
<v Speaker 3>And when you're deciding whether content or a content creator

0:35:57.280 --> 0:36:00.600
<v Speaker 3>is generally PG thirteen or not using artificient telligence for that,

0:36:00.840 --> 0:36:01.360
<v Speaker 3>how we.

0:36:01.400 --> 0:36:03.200
<v Speaker 14>Do we use our official intelligence. So the first thing

0:36:03.239 --> 0:36:05.520
<v Speaker 14>we did was we reviewed our policies, all the guidelines

0:36:05.520 --> 0:36:08.319
<v Speaker 14>we had around what is inappropriate content for a team,

0:36:08.360 --> 0:36:10.200
<v Speaker 14>so what's appropriate for a team? So we did that

0:36:10.320 --> 0:36:13.560
<v Speaker 14>review on Instagram. And then what we've done is we've

0:36:13.600 --> 0:36:17.160
<v Speaker 14>built the classifiers, our technology, the AI that we use,

0:36:17.480 --> 0:36:20.399
<v Speaker 14>and we've retrained it on some of these new roles

0:36:20.440 --> 0:36:22.480
<v Speaker 14>and rules and tweets and adaptations we've made to the

0:36:22.520 --> 0:36:25.320
<v Speaker 14>policies that goes out across the system. And then we

0:36:25.760 --> 0:36:28.440
<v Speaker 14>find content that we don't believe to be in that

0:36:28.640 --> 0:36:32.399
<v Speaker 14>PG thirteen movie rating kind of space. We will either

0:36:32.480 --> 0:36:34.000
<v Speaker 14>hide it from teams or we will.

0:36:33.920 --> 0:36:34.680
<v Speaker 4>Remove it entirely.

0:36:35.520 --> 0:36:39.200
<v Speaker 2>Tara, there's still questions about from how the technology and

0:36:39.320 --> 0:36:42.200
<v Speaker 2>from a policy perspective, you define what is or what

0:36:42.400 --> 0:36:46.160
<v Speaker 2>is not PG thirteen. So could you answer that more

0:36:46.200 --> 0:36:50.239
<v Speaker 2>specifically on a post by post basis, how is a

0:36:50.320 --> 0:36:53.280
<v Speaker 2>decision made this is or this is not PG thirteen.

0:36:53.560 --> 0:36:55.160
<v Speaker 14>Yeah, So the first thing is we don't rate if

0:36:55.160 --> 0:36:57.359
<v Speaker 14>you're on Instagram and how this is going to look

0:36:57.400 --> 0:37:00.239
<v Speaker 14>and feel if you're a teenager on Instagram. Now, first

0:37:00.239 --> 0:37:01.880
<v Speaker 14>of all, we're going to be sending a notification at

0:37:01.880 --> 0:37:04.160
<v Speaker 14>the top of your feed for teenagers to let them

0:37:04.200 --> 0:37:05.680
<v Speaker 14>know what we're doing here, to let them know that

0:37:05.760 --> 0:37:08.960
<v Speaker 14>we're going to be aligning and guided by PG thirteen ratings.

0:37:09.560 --> 0:37:11.360
<v Speaker 14>What it will look and feel like if you're a

0:37:11.440 --> 0:37:13.440
<v Speaker 14>parent is hopefully that they will understand. Again, we're going

0:37:13.520 --> 0:37:16.160
<v Speaker 14>to be sending notifications to parents again, really trying to

0:37:16.560 --> 0:37:19.399
<v Speaker 14>speak the language of parents. What we've done is we've

0:37:19.440 --> 0:37:22.160
<v Speaker 14>made some changes to the policies so that if you're

0:37:22.200 --> 0:37:25.200
<v Speaker 14>thinking about a PG thirteen movie that's the kind of

0:37:25.280 --> 0:37:26.920
<v Speaker 14>experience your team's are going to have. So what a

0:37:27.000 --> 0:37:30.120
<v Speaker 14>good example of that would be around cursing? So profanity.

0:37:30.800 --> 0:37:33.719
<v Speaker 14>We've always had rules around profanity on Instagram and there's

0:37:33.719 --> 0:37:35.800
<v Speaker 14>certain things you can and can't say. But on a

0:37:35.880 --> 0:37:38.920
<v Speaker 14>PG thirteen movie, they have very very specific standards around this.

0:37:39.000 --> 0:37:42.320
<v Speaker 14>You can use one or two quite strong curse words

0:37:42.440 --> 0:37:45.440
<v Speaker 14>and then other you knows less, more minor cursewords.

0:37:45.719 --> 0:37:47.000
<v Speaker 4>So what we did is we looked at this.

0:37:47.239 --> 0:37:49.200
<v Speaker 14>We're not apples for apples, of course, you know, we're

0:37:49.239 --> 0:37:52.160
<v Speaker 14>a social media company as opposed to making movies, but

0:37:52.280 --> 0:37:55.000
<v Speaker 14>we thought what would be equivalent on Instagram. The equivalent

0:37:55.120 --> 0:37:58.040
<v Speaker 14>on Instagram is we're not going to be recommending content

0:37:58.120 --> 0:38:00.880
<v Speaker 14>to teens that has severe what we would describe as

0:38:00.880 --> 0:38:04.040
<v Speaker 14>severe cursewords. So we train the AI to find those

0:38:04.120 --> 0:38:06.640
<v Speaker 14>types of cursewords and we will remove them so that

0:38:06.800 --> 0:38:08.680
<v Speaker 14>we're not going to be recommending that kind of content

0:38:08.760 --> 0:38:09.320
<v Speaker 14>to teens.

0:38:10.360 --> 0:38:14.279
<v Speaker 2>Tara, what other protections are you thinking about doing additionally

0:38:14.360 --> 0:38:14.920
<v Speaker 2>going forward?

0:38:15.160 --> 0:38:17.560
<v Speaker 14>So we're also announcing today two further things. One is

0:38:17.600 --> 0:38:20.399
<v Speaker 14>that we're going to be giving parents more control if

0:38:20.440 --> 0:38:24.320
<v Speaker 14>they wish to. So again, these this update is for

0:38:24.520 --> 0:38:26.200
<v Speaker 14>all teens under the age of eighteen. When we know

0:38:26.280 --> 0:38:27.719
<v Speaker 14>you're under the age of eighteen, you're going to be

0:38:27.840 --> 0:38:30.439
<v Speaker 14>moved by default into the PG thirteen or the plus

0:38:30.520 --> 0:38:33.600
<v Speaker 14>thirteen setting on Instagram. That's the first thing, But if

0:38:33.640 --> 0:38:36.640
<v Speaker 14>a parent wants to go that step further, we're really

0:38:36.680 --> 0:38:38.320
<v Speaker 14>going to help parents to do that. So one of

0:38:38.440 --> 0:38:41.400
<v Speaker 14>the additional one of the other things they're doing announcing

0:38:41.400 --> 0:38:44.560
<v Speaker 14>today is that we will have limited even more limited

0:38:44.680 --> 0:38:47.000
<v Speaker 14>content control. Parents can go in and they can have

0:38:47.040 --> 0:38:48.520
<v Speaker 14>a look at that, they can talk to their team,

0:38:48.600 --> 0:38:51.200
<v Speaker 14>have a conversation with them. Particularly if your teenager is

0:38:51.239 --> 0:38:53.560
<v Speaker 14>in the younger category, you might want to limit the

0:38:53.600 --> 0:38:54.719
<v Speaker 14>content even further.

0:38:55.880 --> 0:38:59.279
<v Speaker 3>Yes, briefly got tens of millions of teen accounts. How

0:38:59.360 --> 0:39:02.839
<v Speaker 3>many are to opt out navigate those age rules? How

0:39:02.880 --> 0:39:06.360
<v Speaker 3>are you ensuring that they do remain within those age catchments?

0:39:06.680 --> 0:39:08.800
<v Speaker 14>So we now have hundreds of millions of teens in

0:39:08.880 --> 0:39:10.920
<v Speaker 14>the teen Account experience, which which has been which we

0:39:11.040 --> 0:39:12.920
<v Speaker 14>launched last year, which is really good news. We've been

0:39:12.920 --> 0:39:15.200
<v Speaker 14>able to do that technically, which is a pretty big

0:39:15.719 --> 0:39:17.640
<v Speaker 14>challenge to be able to do that. We know that

0:39:17.840 --> 0:39:20.279
<v Speaker 14>ninety seven percent of teens that we've moved into the

0:39:20.320 --> 0:39:23.879
<v Speaker 14>teen account experience, have not tried to change those more

0:39:23.960 --> 0:39:26.759
<v Speaker 14>protective settings when they're in the younger age Cash Green,

0:39:26.880 --> 0:39:30.080
<v Speaker 14>so teens below the age of sixteen cannot change the

0:39:30.160 --> 0:39:33.800
<v Speaker 14>settings we set in teen accounts without getting a parent's permission.

0:39:33.920 --> 0:39:36.520
<v Speaker 14>We're going a step further with these content setting changes,

0:39:36.560 --> 0:39:39.120
<v Speaker 14>which is it's for every teen under the age of eighteen,

0:39:39.480 --> 0:39:42.239
<v Speaker 14>but they can't change them unless they get a parent

0:39:42.280 --> 0:39:42.920
<v Speaker 14>to approve.

0:39:42.680 --> 0:39:43.080
<v Speaker 6>It as well.

0:39:44.520 --> 0:39:47.880
<v Speaker 2>Tara Hopkins, Global Director for Policy for Instagram, thank you

0:39:48.000 --> 0:39:51.160
<v Speaker 2>very much for joining us here on Bloomberg ten. Okay,

0:39:51.200 --> 0:39:55.600
<v Speaker 2>coming up Europe races to prove Jensen one wrong about

0:39:55.719 --> 0:39:59.000
<v Speaker 2>their AI capability that Bloomberg de diive.

0:39:59.120 --> 0:40:01.040
<v Speaker 6>Next is Bloomberg Tech.

0:40:10.920 --> 0:40:13.239
<v Speaker 3>Time now before Quing Tech and first up SpaceX. Well,

0:40:13.280 --> 0:40:15.680
<v Speaker 3>It's pulled off another successful launch and return of its

0:40:15.719 --> 0:40:19.560
<v Speaker 3>Starship rocket, which deployed test satellite into orbit. The Lamsqu's

0:40:19.560 --> 0:40:23.080
<v Speaker 3>space company still has to demonstrate and master several novel

0:40:23.120 --> 0:40:26.000
<v Speaker 3>technologies to meet in its goal of a lunar landing

0:40:26.040 --> 0:40:28.400
<v Speaker 3>in the next two years. Has Apple Well, It's had

0:40:28.400 --> 0:40:30.600
<v Speaker 3>a release date for the launch of its super thin

0:40:30.760 --> 0:40:32.120
<v Speaker 3>iPhone Air in China.

0:40:32.440 --> 0:40:34.759
<v Speaker 4>The phone will be available in stores later this month

0:40:34.880 --> 0:40:35.160
<v Speaker 4>after a.

0:40:35.239 --> 0:40:38.440
<v Speaker 3>Pause that allow local carriers to prepare for the device,

0:40:38.520 --> 0:40:39.680
<v Speaker 3>which is eSIM only.

0:40:40.080 --> 0:40:42.160
<v Speaker 4>The news coincided with a visit to the country by

0:40:42.200 --> 0:40:45.680
<v Speaker 4>Apple CEO Tim Cook, and Google is planning its biggest

0:40:45.719 --> 0:40:46.200
<v Speaker 4>investment in.

0:40:46.280 --> 0:40:48.759
<v Speaker 3>India yet, about fifteen billion dollars to build an AI

0:40:48.840 --> 0:40:51.759
<v Speaker 3>infrastructure hub in the South over the next five years.

0:40:51.960 --> 0:40:54.000
<v Speaker 3>India has been one of the biggest winners of the

0:40:54.040 --> 0:40:57.160
<v Speaker 3>global AI boom, and the project will help accelerate local

0:40:57.239 --> 0:40:59.720
<v Speaker 3>government efforts to expand the AI industry.

0:41:01.440 --> 0:41:05.160
<v Speaker 2>Videos Jensen Wong issued an AI warning to Europe and

0:41:05.400 --> 0:41:06.760
<v Speaker 2>France over the summer.

0:41:07.040 --> 0:41:09.279
<v Speaker 6>You are too slow. Now.

0:41:09.360 --> 0:41:12.000
<v Speaker 2>European leaders are working to prove him wrong, with many

0:41:12.080 --> 0:41:17.000
<v Speaker 2>committing billions to homegrown AI startups and services. Bloomberg's European

0:41:17.040 --> 0:41:20.000
<v Speaker 2>tech reporter Mark Bergen has been writing about Europe's attens

0:41:20.080 --> 0:41:22.959
<v Speaker 2>a catching up and joins us now Jensen Wong says,

0:41:23.000 --> 0:41:26.040
<v Speaker 2>you are too slow at sort of an EU wide

0:41:26.160 --> 0:41:28.360
<v Speaker 2>level or country by country level. What is it that

0:41:28.400 --> 0:41:31.040
<v Speaker 2>they're actually doing to prove him wrong or at least

0:41:31.120 --> 0:41:31.560
<v Speaker 2>catch up.

0:41:32.800 --> 0:41:34.839
<v Speaker 15>Yeah, that anecdote from our story was like the lead

0:41:34.920 --> 0:41:37.600
<v Speaker 15>of it was a dinner hosted by Emanuel mal Cron

0:41:37.680 --> 0:41:40.760
<v Speaker 15>and in a way before his government collapsed that France

0:41:40.880 --> 0:41:44.279
<v Speaker 15>was seen as the vanguard here. They had that this

0:41:44.440 --> 0:41:47.160
<v Speaker 15>earlier this year they announced the largest data center project

0:41:47.560 --> 0:41:50.840
<v Speaker 15>in the EU. They have Miestrol, which is the closest

0:41:50.880 --> 0:41:53.640
<v Speaker 15>thing that Europe has to sort of an open AI arrival,

0:41:54.200 --> 0:41:56.640
<v Speaker 15>and a lot of money in public support from the government.

0:41:57.080 --> 0:42:02.200
<v Speaker 15>The European Commission Union has put money behind chips, behind

0:42:02.400 --> 0:42:06.240
<v Speaker 15>what they call these AI gigafactories, basically large data center projects.

0:42:06.560 --> 0:42:08.480
<v Speaker 15>If you compare the funding those to the US and China,

0:42:08.520 --> 0:42:11.759
<v Speaker 15>though obviously Europe is still lagging third place.

0:42:12.200 --> 0:42:14.719
<v Speaker 3>When we think about the key players of Europe, they

0:42:14.760 --> 0:42:17.680
<v Speaker 3>do have some standouts ASML. When you think chip equipment making,

0:42:17.719 --> 0:42:20.560
<v Speaker 3>you got SAP bringing it to the enterprise. But where

0:42:20.640 --> 0:42:23.560
<v Speaker 3>else are they trying to grow their own talent and

0:42:23.719 --> 0:42:27.759
<v Speaker 3>indeed risk pushing back though the US influx of money

0:42:27.840 --> 0:42:29.640
<v Speaker 3>that seemed to come with Jensen's last visit.

0:42:31.400 --> 0:42:32.960
<v Speaker 15>Yeah, I think there's a couple of things happening and

0:42:33.120 --> 0:42:34.960
<v Speaker 15>we can't try to captures in the debate there are

0:42:35.320 --> 0:42:37.600
<v Speaker 15>you know, Jensen has been kind of teased Europe for

0:42:37.680 --> 0:42:40.560
<v Speaker 15>moving too slowly. Clearly he wants them to be buying

0:42:40.600 --> 0:42:44.040
<v Speaker 15>more in Vidia chips, and there are others that argue

0:42:44.160 --> 0:42:48.520
<v Speaker 15>that maybe this sovereignty, this idea of independence from the

0:42:48.640 --> 0:42:51.440
<v Speaker 15>US and China means not relying on in Nvidia, not

0:42:51.560 --> 0:42:54.279
<v Speaker 15>relying on open Ai, not relying on Microsoft and the

0:42:54.320 --> 0:42:57.080
<v Speaker 15>cloud providers. That's a lot more difficult. I think the

0:42:57.160 --> 0:42:59.760
<v Speaker 15>cloud is where we're starting to see some really interesting

0:43:00.120 --> 0:43:03.759
<v Speaker 15>neo clouds. Nebulus is a Dutch company here that's fun

0:43:03.800 --> 0:43:08.200
<v Speaker 15>out from Russia's Yendex that's had a really fascinating growth trajectory.

0:43:08.520 --> 0:43:10.680
<v Speaker 15>We've seen a lot of these neocloud companies come up

0:43:10.760 --> 0:43:14.080
<v Speaker 15>in Europe. Some of them are really positioning themselves as

0:43:14.160 --> 0:43:16.680
<v Speaker 15>alternatives to the US providers, and.

0:43:16.760 --> 0:43:19.040
<v Speaker 3>Scale being another key name we keep hearing about Mark

0:43:19.080 --> 0:43:22.360
<v Speaker 3>Bergen great story, and what you don't want to forget

0:43:22.480 --> 0:43:24.520
<v Speaker 3>is we're going to dive into all of these topics

0:43:24.760 --> 0:43:28.160
<v Speaker 3>so much more next week showing Bloomberg Tech summits Tale

0:43:28.160 --> 0:43:31.360
<v Speaker 3>and being hosted in London is on October the twenty first.

0:43:32.160 --> 0:43:34.200
<v Speaker 4>But meanwhile, that does it for this edition.

0:43:34.280 --> 0:43:36.879
<v Speaker 3>A Bloomberg Tech and a lot to digest in terms

0:43:36.920 --> 0:43:39.000
<v Speaker 3>of geopolitics and in terms of valuations.

0:43:39.520 --> 0:43:42.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, there's still a little bit of anxiety in technology markets.

0:43:42.640 --> 0:43:46.200
<v Speaker 2>It's largely focused to trade. Salesforce is down two percent

0:43:46.280 --> 0:43:48.319
<v Speaker 2>on the day that Dreamforce kicks off. How's that going

0:43:48.400 --> 0:43:50.600
<v Speaker 2>to go down? You can recap that on the podcast.

0:43:50.680 --> 0:43:52.359
<v Speaker 2>You know where to find it. It's online on all

0:43:52.400 --> 0:43:55.760
<v Speaker 2>those platforms. It's on the Bloomberg platforms. Big week ahead,

0:43:56.080 --> 0:43:57.040
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Tech