WEBVTT - Is Love an Addiction?

0:00:00.200 --> 0:00:02.400
<v Speaker 1>Hey, please take a second and leave us a review

0:00:02.480 --> 0:00:06.279
<v Speaker 1>on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or wherever you listen to the podcast.

0:00:06.960 --> 0:00:10.960
<v Speaker 1>Thanks a lot. Hey, welcome to Sign Stuff, a production

0:00:11.119 --> 0:00:14.640
<v Speaker 1>of iHeartRadio Hoorheit Cham And today we're answering the question

0:00:15.160 --> 0:00:18.760
<v Speaker 1>is love and addiction? What's going on inside of our

0:00:18.760 --> 0:00:21.680
<v Speaker 1>brains when we think of our loved ones, our spouses,

0:00:21.720 --> 0:00:24.479
<v Speaker 1>our kids, our friends. We're going to dig into the

0:00:24.560 --> 0:00:28.680
<v Speaker 1>signs of love, looking at how psychologists and neuroscientists have

0:00:28.800 --> 0:00:32.000
<v Speaker 1>tried to understand it and measure it, and we're going

0:00:32.040 --> 0:00:35.199
<v Speaker 1>to ask the question, if love is addicting, can you

0:00:35.280 --> 0:00:38.839
<v Speaker 1>manipulate it with drugs? So get ready to fall in

0:00:38.920 --> 0:00:41.839
<v Speaker 1>love with the signs of love as we might as

0:00:41.880 --> 0:00:48.680
<v Speaker 1>well face it. Are we addicted to love? Hey? Everyone,

0:00:48.880 --> 0:00:52.160
<v Speaker 1>Today we have a different kind of episode. It's thanksgeping

0:00:52.240 --> 0:00:54.880
<v Speaker 1>Weak and I'm spending time with my family, So I'm

0:00:54.880 --> 0:00:57.400
<v Speaker 1>going to play for you a chapter from the audiobook

0:00:57.640 --> 0:01:01.360
<v Speaker 1>of my latest nonfiction book, Out of Your Mind, which

0:01:01.400 --> 0:01:05.679
<v Speaker 1>I wrote with neuroscientist Dwayne Godwin. You know doctor Godwin.

0:01:05.840 --> 0:01:08.720
<v Speaker 1>He's been on the show several times. And in this chapter,

0:01:08.920 --> 0:01:11.840
<v Speaker 1>we ask the question why do we love? And we

0:01:11.920 --> 0:01:15.160
<v Speaker 1>look at the evidence that says that love is basically

0:01:15.360 --> 0:01:17.800
<v Speaker 1>an addiction. It's one of my favorite chapters in the

0:01:17.800 --> 0:01:20.600
<v Speaker 1>book because it goes into the whole history of how

0:01:20.680 --> 0:01:24.160
<v Speaker 1>scientists have tried to get a handle on this lovely topic.

0:01:24.440 --> 0:01:26.200
<v Speaker 1>And hey, if you like the chapter, be sure to

0:01:26.240 --> 0:01:28.080
<v Speaker 1>check out the rest of the book. You can find

0:01:28.160 --> 0:01:31.520
<v Speaker 1>Out of Your Mind in stores everywhere. Okay, the chapter

0:01:31.560 --> 0:01:34.360
<v Speaker 1>starts with a quote from William Shakespeare, and the first

0:01:34.400 --> 0:01:37.880
<v Speaker 1>question we tackle is whether humans are the only animals

0:01:38.080 --> 0:01:43.160
<v Speaker 1>dad love. Here's Professor Dwayne Godwin reading from Out of Your.

0:01:43.040 --> 0:01:49.200
<v Speaker 2>Mind, Chapter two, Why do we love? Love looks not

0:01:49.360 --> 0:01:52.680
<v Speaker 2>with the eyes, but with the mind, and therefore is

0:01:52.760 --> 0:01:57.880
<v Speaker 2>winged Cupid painted blind? William Shakespeare A Midsummer Night's Dream.

0:01:59.040 --> 0:02:02.400
<v Speaker 2>William Shakespeare may not have been a neuroscientist, but he

0:02:02.440 --> 0:02:05.480
<v Speaker 2>certainly knew a lot about human emotion. His plays tell

0:02:05.600 --> 0:02:09.400
<v Speaker 2>stories of human love in its many forms, Young irrational love,

0:02:09.680 --> 0:02:13.880
<v Speaker 2>Omeo and Juliet, the love between parents and their children, Kinglear,

0:02:14.600 --> 0:02:18.720
<v Speaker 2>and even the love of country Julius Caesar. To many,

0:02:19.000 --> 0:02:22.840
<v Speaker 2>love may seem like the quintessential human emotion, but actually

0:02:23.040 --> 0:02:25.960
<v Speaker 2>humans are not alone in showing signs of love. In

0:02:26.000 --> 0:02:29.160
<v Speaker 2>the case of romantic love. About four percent of mammals

0:02:29.160 --> 0:02:33.560
<v Speaker 2>pair up in lifelong monogamous couples. We share that distinction

0:02:33.720 --> 0:02:37.200
<v Speaker 2>with prairie voles and beavers, among a few others, and

0:02:37.320 --> 0:02:42.040
<v Speaker 2>up to ninety five percent of birds do. The majority

0:02:42.080 --> 0:02:45.080
<v Speaker 2>of complex animals on the planet exhibits some form of

0:02:45.160 --> 0:02:49.520
<v Speaker 2>care and devotion to their young. Palaeontologists have even found

0:02:49.600 --> 0:02:54.800
<v Speaker 2>fossils of dinosaur mothers that seemingly died while protecting their

0:02:54.840 --> 0:02:58.920
<v Speaker 2>nest of eggs. At the same time, the human experience

0:02:58.919 --> 0:03:01.919
<v Speaker 2>of love appears to be more vexing and complex than

0:03:02.200 --> 0:03:05.160
<v Speaker 2>mere instinct. At the very least, it seems to be

0:03:05.200 --> 0:03:08.360
<v Speaker 2>more dramatic. After all, how many beavers or birds of

0:03:08.400 --> 0:03:12.959
<v Speaker 2>written sonnets or entire operas detailing the impossible situations that

0:03:13.080 --> 0:03:17.760
<v Speaker 2>love puts us in. If you ask around, most people

0:03:17.760 --> 0:03:20.200
<v Speaker 2>will tell you that love is a feeling. It's what

0:03:20.240 --> 0:03:23.079
<v Speaker 2>you feel when you look at your spouse, or your child,

0:03:23.480 --> 0:03:25.960
<v Speaker 2>or your parents are the people who are close to you.

0:03:26.520 --> 0:03:29.000
<v Speaker 2>It's the urge you feel to be near them, to

0:03:29.080 --> 0:03:34.080
<v Speaker 2>care for them, and to make sure they're safe and happy. Unfortunately,

0:03:34.200 --> 0:03:36.800
<v Speaker 2>these days, we also use the word to describe how

0:03:36.840 --> 0:03:38.960
<v Speaker 2>we feel about a lot of things. We use it

0:03:39.000 --> 0:03:43.440
<v Speaker 2>for objects love your shoes, food, who doesn't love pie?

0:03:43.760 --> 0:03:48.880
<v Speaker 2>And even abstract concepts. I love democracy. Clearly, it's hyperbole

0:03:49.280 --> 0:03:52.320
<v Speaker 2>unless you actually feel the same way about shoes as

0:03:52.360 --> 0:03:55.840
<v Speaker 2>you do about your kids or your spouse. But what

0:03:56.040 --> 0:04:00.240
<v Speaker 2>is that feeling of love? How is it encoded in

0:04:00.280 --> 0:04:03.680
<v Speaker 2>the brain? Is there a trigger for falling into it?

0:04:04.040 --> 0:04:06.840
<v Speaker 2>Though love may seem like the stuff of literature or

0:04:06.880 --> 0:04:11.560
<v Speaker 2>sappy poems, psychologists and neuroscientists have been probing its mysteries

0:04:11.640 --> 0:04:15.200
<v Speaker 2>for over eighty years, and with modern technology they've started

0:04:15.200 --> 0:04:18.679
<v Speaker 2>to answer a few key questions about the loving brain,

0:04:19.000 --> 0:04:22.960
<v Speaker 2>including these. Is there an area in the brain devoted

0:04:22.960 --> 0:04:27.880
<v Speaker 2>to love? Does a love chemical exist? Do I really

0:04:27.920 --> 0:04:32.120
<v Speaker 2>love pie the same way I love my kids? Interestingly,

0:04:32.320 --> 0:04:35.960
<v Speaker 2>the answer to all of these questions, including the third one,

0:04:36.040 --> 0:04:40.600
<v Speaker 2>is sort of. Love is a many splendid thing. So

0:04:40.680 --> 0:04:44.960
<v Speaker 2>let's take a dive and fall madly into its biological complexities.

0:04:45.920 --> 0:04:50.320
<v Speaker 2>Trust us, you're going to love it. The love scales.

0:04:52.279 --> 0:04:57.640
<v Speaker 2>The history of love research starts in the nineteen forties. Psychologists,

0:04:57.839 --> 0:05:01.320
<v Speaker 2>eager to prove their metal is scientists, started to tackle

0:05:01.360 --> 0:05:06.520
<v Speaker 2>complex human emotions with more exacting methods The problem was

0:05:06.640 --> 0:05:10.039
<v Speaker 2>that they didn't have the technology to peer into people's brains,

0:05:10.279 --> 0:05:14.000
<v Speaker 2>and unlike basic skills like language or movement, there were

0:05:14.000 --> 0:05:17.279
<v Speaker 2>no cases, at least at the time, of people with

0:05:17.400 --> 0:05:21.560
<v Speaker 2>clear brain injuries that prevented them from loving or being lovable,

0:05:22.720 --> 0:05:24.920
<v Speaker 2>so they had to resort to the same method most

0:05:24.960 --> 0:05:27.840
<v Speaker 2>of us use. To figure out how anyone feels, they

0:05:27.839 --> 0:05:32.560
<v Speaker 2>had to ask. Of course, people are notoriously unreliable when

0:05:32.600 --> 0:05:35.080
<v Speaker 2>it comes to knowing their own feelings or reading the

0:05:35.080 --> 0:05:38.279
<v Speaker 2>feelings of others, so for psychologists, the first order of

0:05:38.320 --> 0:05:41.320
<v Speaker 2>business was to standardize the set of questions one would

0:05:41.440 --> 0:05:44.159
<v Speaker 2>ask to find out if someone felt love or not.

0:05:45.680 --> 0:05:48.000
<v Speaker 2>The goal is to be able to measure love in

0:05:48.040 --> 0:05:51.560
<v Speaker 2>a person so that you can then do scientific studies

0:05:51.600 --> 0:05:55.120
<v Speaker 2>with that information. For example, if you can figure out

0:05:55.120 --> 0:05:58.200
<v Speaker 2>that a group of people definitely loves their spouses and

0:05:58.279 --> 0:06:01.520
<v Speaker 2>that another group definitely doesn't, you might then look at

0:06:01.520 --> 0:06:04.400
<v Speaker 2>the two groups to see where that difference could be

0:06:04.440 --> 0:06:07.880
<v Speaker 2>coming from. It could be something inherent about the person

0:06:08.279 --> 0:06:12.479
<v Speaker 2>or something external. In psychology, the go to tools for

0:06:12.600 --> 0:06:17.640
<v Speaker 2>measuring complex emotions like love are called scales. Basically, they

0:06:17.680 --> 0:06:20.960
<v Speaker 2>are questionnaires that pose a series of statements and then

0:06:21.080 --> 0:06:23.680
<v Speaker 2>ask you to rache your response depending on how much

0:06:23.720 --> 0:06:27.960
<v Speaker 2>you agree or disagree with those statements. For example, one

0:06:28.040 --> 0:06:31.960
<v Speaker 2>questionnaire might say true love lasts forever and then ask

0:06:32.000 --> 0:06:34.839
<v Speaker 2>you to pick a number between one and ten. One

0:06:34.839 --> 0:06:39.400
<v Speaker 2>equals strongly disagree, ten equals strongly agree, depending on how

0:06:39.440 --> 0:06:43.440
<v Speaker 2>you feel about that. Other questionnaires might have statements like

0:06:43.720 --> 0:06:46.480
<v Speaker 2>I would rather be with my partner than anyone else,

0:06:46.920 --> 0:06:49.640
<v Speaker 2>or I would feel deep despair if I couldn't be

0:06:49.720 --> 0:06:52.919
<v Speaker 2>with this person, depending on whether you want to measure

0:06:52.960 --> 0:06:57.320
<v Speaker 2>a person's attitude or experience with love. In this way,

0:06:57.520 --> 0:06:59.640
<v Speaker 2>a scale could get a rough measure of how you

0:06:59.680 --> 0:07:03.080
<v Speaker 2>feel about love, whether you experience it in your life,

0:07:03.279 --> 0:07:06.320
<v Speaker 2>and how often you experience it, whether you think it's

0:07:06.360 --> 0:07:10.240
<v Speaker 2>a positive thing, whether you feel it toward a particular person, etc.

0:07:11.160 --> 0:07:13.679
<v Speaker 2>It's not that different from one of those pop quizes

0:07:13.760 --> 0:07:16.480
<v Speaker 2>you might find in a fashion or a romance magazine,

0:07:16.640 --> 0:07:21.280
<v Speaker 2>with the key difference of added scientific rigor. Psychologists take

0:07:21.320 --> 0:07:24.040
<v Speaker 2>great care to make sure that the scales are reliable

0:07:24.280 --> 0:07:27.080
<v Speaker 2>so the results don't depend on the person's momentary mood

0:07:27.200 --> 0:07:31.400
<v Speaker 2>or immediate circumstances, and valid so the results actually measure

0:07:31.720 --> 0:07:35.320
<v Speaker 2>what you're trying to measure. It's not a perfect assessment,

0:07:35.720 --> 0:07:38.320
<v Speaker 2>but short of being able to read someone's mind, it's

0:07:38.360 --> 0:07:41.960
<v Speaker 2>the best anyone can do. Over the years, lots of

0:07:42.080 --> 0:07:46.760
<v Speaker 2>psychologists proposed many different love scales with names like the

0:07:46.880 --> 0:07:53.160
<v Speaker 2>Caring Relationship's Inventory or the Romantic Acts Questionnaire, and over

0:07:53.200 --> 0:07:55.600
<v Speaker 2>the years a few have risen to the top in

0:07:55.680 --> 0:07:59.280
<v Speaker 2>terms of their popularity or perception as being the most reliable.

0:08:00.880 --> 0:08:04.400
<v Speaker 2>Each of them has two things in common with the others. One,

0:08:04.520 --> 0:08:06.760
<v Speaker 2>they are based on a theory that breaks down the

0:08:06.760 --> 0:08:10.280
<v Speaker 2>different kinds of love, and two, they recognize that love

0:08:10.360 --> 0:08:14.720
<v Speaker 2>is not just a feeling, but a combination of rational thoughts, emotions,

0:08:14.760 --> 0:08:20.080
<v Speaker 2>and behaviors. For example, Robert Sternberg's triangular theory of love

0:08:20.160 --> 0:08:26.280
<v Speaker 2>scale assumes that love is a mix of three basic ingredients, passion, closeness,

0:08:26.320 --> 0:08:29.920
<v Speaker 2>and commitment. For passion, it might ask you to weigh

0:08:29.960 --> 0:08:32.840
<v Speaker 2>in on statements like I find this person to be

0:08:33.040 --> 0:08:36.960
<v Speaker 2>very personally attractive, while for closeness, it might pose to

0:08:37.040 --> 0:08:41.640
<v Speaker 2>you I share deeply personal information with this person. The

0:08:41.760 --> 0:08:44.720
<v Speaker 2>idea is to make a model that maps all of

0:08:44.760 --> 0:08:48.640
<v Speaker 2>the different kinds of love that people experience. Are you

0:08:48.720 --> 0:08:51.439
<v Speaker 2>committed to someone and feel close to them but are

0:08:51.480 --> 0:08:56.120
<v Speaker 2>not attracted to them, Then you are feeling companionate love

0:08:56.480 --> 0:09:00.840
<v Speaker 2>i e. Platonic or friend love. Do you have the

0:09:00.880 --> 0:09:03.679
<v Speaker 2>hots for someone but don't particularly want to be close

0:09:03.800 --> 0:09:07.040
<v Speaker 2>or committed to them, Then you are feeling good old

0:09:07.200 --> 0:09:11.400
<v Speaker 2>infatuation love. Do you feel attracted to someone and feel

0:09:11.400 --> 0:09:14.760
<v Speaker 2>close to them and want to commit long term to them,

0:09:15.160 --> 0:09:21.560
<v Speaker 2>Then you hit the jackpot and found consummate love. Another

0:09:21.640 --> 0:09:26.600
<v Speaker 2>well accepted scale, Elaine Hatfield and Susan Sprecker's Passionate Love

0:09:26.640 --> 0:09:31.480
<v Speaker 2>Scale or PLS, measures romantic love and more explicitly breaks

0:09:31.520 --> 0:09:36.360
<v Speaker 2>down love into rational thoughts, emotions, and behaviors. For example,

0:09:36.520 --> 0:09:39.920
<v Speaker 2>if my post statements like for me, this person is

0:09:40.080 --> 0:09:43.320
<v Speaker 2>the perfect romantic partner. To see what you think of

0:09:43.360 --> 0:09:47.720
<v Speaker 2>that person, I melt when looking deeply into their eyes,

0:09:48.160 --> 0:09:51.520
<v Speaker 2>to see how you feel about them, and I can't

0:09:51.520 --> 0:09:54.880
<v Speaker 2>stop thinking about this person. To measure how it affects

0:09:54.880 --> 0:09:58.760
<v Speaker 2>your actions, add up your scores for all thirty of

0:09:58.800 --> 0:10:01.559
<v Speaker 2>the scale statements that should tell you how much you

0:10:01.679 --> 0:10:04.280
<v Speaker 2>love that person. If it was between one hundred and

0:10:04.320 --> 0:10:07.040
<v Speaker 2>six and one hundred and thirty five points, you're wildly,

0:10:07.160 --> 0:10:10.600
<v Speaker 2>even recklessly in love. Between eighty six and one hundred

0:10:10.600 --> 0:10:14.360
<v Speaker 2>and five points, passionate but less intense, sixty six to

0:10:14.440 --> 0:10:18.360
<v Speaker 2>eighty five points occasional burst of passion, forty five to

0:10:18.440 --> 0:10:23.240
<v Speaker 2>sixty five points, tepit infrequent passion, and fifteen to forty

0:10:23.240 --> 0:10:28.800
<v Speaker 2>four points the thrill is gone. Psychologists have been using

0:10:28.840 --> 0:10:31.240
<v Speaker 2>scales like this to try to get a handle on

0:10:31.280 --> 0:10:33.240
<v Speaker 2>what it means to be in love and where it

0:10:33.280 --> 0:10:37.240
<v Speaker 2>comes from. For example, in one study, researchers asked men

0:10:37.280 --> 0:10:41.400
<v Speaker 2>and women from different cultures white people in the US, Japanese,

0:10:41.480 --> 0:10:45.920
<v Speaker 2>and Filipinos to take the PLS Survey. The goal was

0:10:45.960 --> 0:10:50.320
<v Speaker 2>to test whether Eastern and Western cultures loved or thought

0:10:50.320 --> 0:10:53.800
<v Speaker 2>about bove in the same way. They found that the

0:10:53.840 --> 0:10:57.720
<v Speaker 2>scores of love intensity were not that different between different groups,

0:10:58.520 --> 0:11:04.800
<v Speaker 2>underscoring the idea that is indeed a universal feeling. Of course,

0:11:04.880 --> 0:11:07.120
<v Speaker 2>these scales only give us a view of love from

0:11:07.120 --> 0:11:10.320
<v Speaker 2>the outside looking in. They don't actually tell us what's

0:11:10.360 --> 0:11:14.200
<v Speaker 2>going on inside someone's brain. But these scales prove to

0:11:14.200 --> 0:11:17.600
<v Speaker 2>be very important when the technology to do so finally

0:11:17.640 --> 0:11:18.719
<v Speaker 2>became available.

0:11:21.679 --> 0:11:24.200
<v Speaker 1>All right, So that is the beginning of the search

0:11:24.320 --> 0:11:27.600
<v Speaker 1>for love d least the beginning of the scientific search

0:11:27.720 --> 0:11:30.240
<v Speaker 1>for love. It's a feeling and you can learn a

0:11:30.280 --> 0:11:34.360
<v Speaker 1>lot about it and nap it by simply asking people. Now,

0:11:34.400 --> 0:11:36.920
<v Speaker 1>the question is what is actually going on inside your

0:11:36.960 --> 0:11:40.360
<v Speaker 1>brain when you feel love? Is there a love part

0:11:40.520 --> 0:11:42.840
<v Speaker 1>of your brain? When we come back, we're going to

0:11:42.840 --> 0:11:45.840
<v Speaker 1>get into the neuroscience of love and figure out which

0:11:45.920 --> 0:11:48.640
<v Speaker 1>areas of the brain are involved and whether any of

0:11:48.640 --> 0:11:52.400
<v Speaker 1>them are related to addiction. Stay with us, we'll be

0:11:52.559 --> 0:12:06.800
<v Speaker 1>right back. Welcome back. We're talking about the science of

0:12:06.920 --> 0:12:10.680
<v Speaker 1>love and whether love is an addiction. So far, we've

0:12:10.720 --> 0:12:13.280
<v Speaker 1>learned what love is and how the feeling of it

0:12:13.559 --> 0:12:16.880
<v Speaker 1>maps to different versions of the love we all experience.

0:12:17.240 --> 0:12:19.600
<v Speaker 1>Now we're going to ask what's happening in the brain

0:12:19.960 --> 0:12:22.840
<v Speaker 1>when we love. It turns out love is actually something

0:12:22.840 --> 0:12:26.400
<v Speaker 1>you can do fMRI experiments on. Here is Professor Dwaine

0:12:26.440 --> 0:12:29.559
<v Speaker 1>Godwin reading from the book we've wrote together called Out

0:12:29.840 --> 0:12:31.439
<v Speaker 1>of Your Mind.

0:12:32.440 --> 0:12:37.959
<v Speaker 2>Scanning for Love. In the nineteen nineties, a brain scanning

0:12:38.040 --> 0:12:43.360
<v Speaker 2>method called functional magnetic resonance imaging fMRI opened a new

0:12:43.400 --> 0:12:49.959
<v Speaker 2>window into the brain the fMRI revolution. By the nineteen twenties,

0:12:50.040 --> 0:12:53.160
<v Speaker 2>doctors knew that different areas of the brain corresponded to

0:12:53.200 --> 0:12:59.360
<v Speaker 2>different functions Functional magnetic resonance imaging fMRI. Let's just see

0:12:59.400 --> 0:13:03.000
<v Speaker 2>how these are used in real time. The machine works

0:13:03.000 --> 0:13:07.160
<v Speaker 2>by measuring the oxygen consumed by active neurons. When neurons

0:13:07.240 --> 0:13:11.040
<v Speaker 2>use oxygen, it changes the magnetic properties of the hemoglobin

0:13:11.120 --> 0:13:15.040
<v Speaker 2>in your blood. This causes distortions and how the surrounding

0:13:15.040 --> 0:13:19.520
<v Speaker 2>water reacts to strong magnetic fields and pulses. By measuring

0:13:19.559 --> 0:13:22.760
<v Speaker 2>how this energy fluctuates, the machine can tell which brain

0:13:22.840 --> 0:13:25.960
<v Speaker 2>areas are using more oxygen than others. But it's not

0:13:26.040 --> 0:13:29.880
<v Speaker 2>fool proof, and two thousand and nine scientists scanned dead

0:13:29.960 --> 0:13:34.400
<v Speaker 2>salmon and got what looked like a live signal. fMRI

0:13:34.600 --> 0:13:36.640
<v Speaker 2>machines are able to take a picture of your whole

0:13:36.720 --> 0:13:39.960
<v Speaker 2>brain and highlight the parts that are active at any

0:13:40.000 --> 0:13:44.640
<v Speaker 2>given time with millimeter precision. Up to the two thousands,

0:13:44.960 --> 0:13:48.440
<v Speaker 2>fMRI scans have been used to reliably pinpoint areas that

0:13:48.480 --> 0:13:52.760
<v Speaker 2>were mapped by electrical probes, confirming from previous studies where

0:13:52.800 --> 0:13:56.319
<v Speaker 2>the brain's areas for sensing and moving were. Now the

0:13:56.440 --> 0:14:00.800
<v Speaker 2>question was whether they could map more complicated functions, emotions,

0:14:01.000 --> 0:14:04.320
<v Speaker 2>and even love. Would they show that the brain has

0:14:04.360 --> 0:14:07.880
<v Speaker 2>a love area or is love too complicated to narrow

0:14:07.960 --> 0:14:11.040
<v Speaker 2>down to a particular spot. It turns out that the

0:14:11.080 --> 0:14:15.040
<v Speaker 2>answer is a little of both. To find out, neuroscientists

0:14:15.040 --> 0:14:17.880
<v Speaker 2>came up with an experiment in which test subjects were

0:14:17.880 --> 0:14:21.520
<v Speaker 2>put inside an fMRI machine and shown pictures of people

0:14:21.560 --> 0:14:25.000
<v Speaker 2>they loved. We know they loved these people because the

0:14:25.040 --> 0:14:28.920
<v Speaker 2>subjects rated them highly on the PLS Love Scale, which

0:14:28.960 --> 0:14:33.280
<v Speaker 2>they filled out before the experiment. As of control, the

0:14:33.320 --> 0:14:37.120
<v Speaker 2>subjects were also shown photos of friends and acquaintances who

0:14:37.240 --> 0:14:41.360
<v Speaker 2>weren't rated highly on the love scale. This way, neuroscientists

0:14:41.440 --> 0:14:45.160
<v Speaker 2>could measure their brain activity when feelings of love were triggered,

0:14:45.360 --> 0:14:48.440
<v Speaker 2>and they could reliably assume that it was love from

0:14:48.440 --> 0:14:52.120
<v Speaker 2>the Love scale data. As you might expect from a

0:14:52.160 --> 0:14:55.440
<v Speaker 2>complex emotion, lots of areas of the brain lit up,

0:14:55.560 --> 0:14:59.960
<v Speaker 2>but in particular, neuroscientists saw intriguing activity in three specif

0:15:00.360 --> 0:15:03.120
<v Speaker 2>as that give us clues as to how our brain

0:15:03.200 --> 0:15:06.600
<v Speaker 2>processes being in love. The first area they saw light

0:15:06.680 --> 0:15:10.320
<v Speaker 2>up is called the insula. The insula, which means island

0:15:10.520 --> 0:15:13.840
<v Speaker 2>in Latin, is an interesting part of what is known

0:15:13.920 --> 0:15:17.600
<v Speaker 2>as the limbic cortex. It's an area that is folded

0:15:17.680 --> 0:15:20.360
<v Speaker 2>up deep within the side of your brain. You can't

0:15:20.360 --> 0:15:23.160
<v Speaker 2>see it from the typical surface view, and it's thought

0:15:23.200 --> 0:15:26.880
<v Speaker 2>to be where emotions and empathy are processed. When this

0:15:27.040 --> 0:15:30.640
<v Speaker 2>area is destroyed, as happens for example, with a brain

0:15:30.680 --> 0:15:34.840
<v Speaker 2>disorder called fronto temporal dementia, people seem to have a

0:15:34.840 --> 0:15:38.080
<v Speaker 2>harder time controlling their emotions, and they seem to lose

0:15:38.160 --> 0:15:42.200
<v Speaker 2>the ability to perceive the emotions of others, otherwise known

0:15:42.400 --> 0:15:46.920
<v Speaker 2>as empathy. This makes sense because love is an emotion,

0:15:47.280 --> 0:15:51.680
<v Speaker 2>and because empathy is critical to love. Putting ourselves in

0:15:51.800 --> 0:15:55.640
<v Speaker 2>other people's shoes and caring for others are integral parts

0:15:55.840 --> 0:16:01.680
<v Speaker 2>of what it means to love. An area where neuroscientists

0:16:01.720 --> 0:16:06.320
<v Speaker 2>noticed interesting activity is called the amygdala. The amygdalae are

0:16:06.360 --> 0:16:09.560
<v Speaker 2>a pair of nugget like bundles of neurons deep in

0:16:09.640 --> 0:16:13.320
<v Speaker 2>the middle of your brain. These nuggets have a reputation

0:16:13.520 --> 0:16:16.200
<v Speaker 2>as the center for anger and fear in your brain.

0:16:16.760 --> 0:16:20.280
<v Speaker 2>People who are missing their amygdala, if, for example, they

0:16:20.320 --> 0:16:25.440
<v Speaker 2>suffer from a disease called herbach wiathy, which calcifies the amygdala,

0:16:25.600 --> 0:16:28.640
<v Speaker 2>can still function, but they seem to lose the ability

0:16:28.680 --> 0:16:32.600
<v Speaker 2>to feel fear. Tests show they have a hard time

0:16:32.640 --> 0:16:36.080
<v Speaker 2>telling whether something is dangerous or not, and they are

0:16:36.080 --> 0:16:41.000
<v Speaker 2>more willing to approach unfamiliar situations. The amygdala also seems

0:16:41.000 --> 0:16:45.560
<v Speaker 2>to be responsible for aggressive behavior in mice, taking out

0:16:45.600 --> 0:16:50.479
<v Speaker 2>the amygdala seems to make them less territorial. What's interesting

0:16:50.880 --> 0:16:54.280
<v Speaker 2>is that, in the case of the love experiments, activity

0:16:54.400 --> 0:16:59.320
<v Speaker 2>in the amygdala actually decreased when subjects looked at pictures

0:16:59.320 --> 0:17:03.600
<v Speaker 2>of loved ones. In other words, love suppresses your sense

0:17:03.640 --> 0:17:09.800
<v Speaker 2>of fear and aggression, thereby lowering your defenses. The final

0:17:09.840 --> 0:17:13.120
<v Speaker 2>area that neuroscientists took note of and the Love experiments

0:17:13.240 --> 0:17:15.560
<v Speaker 2>is one that gives us the biggest clue about the

0:17:15.640 --> 0:17:19.800
<v Speaker 2>mechanisms for falling and staying in love. It's an area

0:17:19.840 --> 0:17:22.919
<v Speaker 2>that helps explain why humans like to love, why we

0:17:22.960 --> 0:17:25.760
<v Speaker 2>seek it, and why we sometimes even seem to be

0:17:25.880 --> 0:17:31.800
<v Speaker 2>addicted to it. That area is the brain's rewards system.

0:17:31.960 --> 0:17:34.280
<v Speaker 1>Okay, here's where we get to. The main question is

0:17:34.359 --> 0:17:38.560
<v Speaker 1>love and addiction, and the answer is, well, I'd love

0:17:38.600 --> 0:17:40.639
<v Speaker 1>to tell you, but you're gonna have to keep listening.

0:17:41.119 --> 0:17:43.359
<v Speaker 1>But hey, one of the cool things about the audiobook

0:17:43.400 --> 0:17:45.840
<v Speaker 1>We're Out of Your Mind is that you get both

0:17:45.920 --> 0:17:48.199
<v Speaker 1>of the authors reading it to you. So this is

0:17:48.240 --> 0:17:50.320
<v Speaker 1>the part where I take over the narration of the

0:17:50.400 --> 0:17:55.840
<v Speaker 1>chapter Love has its Rewards. You shouldn't be surprising that

0:17:55.880 --> 0:17:58.760
<v Speaker 1>our brains reward system lights up when we think about

0:17:58.800 --> 0:18:02.080
<v Speaker 1>love or when we see are loved ones. Love is

0:18:02.119 --> 0:18:05.879
<v Speaker 1>supposed to feel good. This area rewards you for it.

0:18:05.880 --> 0:18:08.159
<v Speaker 1>It's a network of structures at the very center of

0:18:08.200 --> 0:18:10.800
<v Speaker 1>your brain that tell the rest of you when something

0:18:10.920 --> 0:18:13.480
<v Speaker 1>is good, and it motivates you to seek it out

0:18:13.520 --> 0:18:16.639
<v Speaker 1>and get more of it. That craving you have for fatty,

0:18:16.680 --> 0:18:20.200
<v Speaker 1>sugary foods like chocolate, and the ensuing pleasure you feel

0:18:20.240 --> 0:18:23.240
<v Speaker 1>when you finally indulge in them, that's the brain's reward

0:18:23.320 --> 0:18:26.679
<v Speaker 1>system at work. That feeling of joy when your favorite

0:18:26.680 --> 0:18:29.600
<v Speaker 1>sports team wins the championship, and the impulse you have

0:18:29.680 --> 0:18:35.080
<v Speaker 1>to buy next year's season tickets blame your reward system.

0:18:35.480 --> 0:18:38.119
<v Speaker 1>That sense of peace and calm that washes over you

0:18:38.200 --> 0:18:40.760
<v Speaker 1>when you're surrounded by your loved ones, and the sense

0:18:40.760 --> 0:18:43.000
<v Speaker 1>that there's something missing in your life if you haven't

0:18:43.000 --> 0:18:45.600
<v Speaker 1>seen them in a long time, well, that's also the

0:18:45.640 --> 0:18:50.879
<v Speaker 1>brain's reward system. What the brain scanning experiments found was

0:18:50.920 --> 0:18:53.760
<v Speaker 1>that this reward system is activated when we look at

0:18:53.760 --> 0:18:56.399
<v Speaker 1>pictures of our loved ones. Here's a little of how

0:18:56.440 --> 0:19:00.240
<v Speaker 1>it works. When you do or experience something else, your

0:19:00.240 --> 0:19:03.480
<v Speaker 1>brain is programmed to like a little cluster of neurons

0:19:03.520 --> 0:19:07.880
<v Speaker 1>called the ventral tegmental area or VTA, releases a special

0:19:07.960 --> 0:19:12.320
<v Speaker 1>chemical called dopinin This chemical travels to different parts of

0:19:12.320 --> 0:19:15.879
<v Speaker 1>the brain, essentially yelling out, hey, this is good and important,

0:19:16.160 --> 0:19:21.040
<v Speaker 1>which triggers several actions. It inactivates the amydala, your brain

0:19:21.160 --> 0:19:24.520
<v Speaker 1>center for fear and anger, making you more open to

0:19:24.600 --> 0:19:28.840
<v Speaker 1>pleasure and enjoyment. It turns on the hippocampus, your brain's

0:19:28.880 --> 0:19:32.399
<v Speaker 1>memory center, to record everything about this moment so you

0:19:32.440 --> 0:19:36.280
<v Speaker 1>can remember later what led to this enjoyment. It triggers

0:19:36.440 --> 0:19:40.520
<v Speaker 1>the nucleus occumbents, your brain's motivation center, making you want

0:19:40.640 --> 0:19:45.399
<v Speaker 1>more of this stimulus. And finally, it triggers the prefrontal cortex,

0:19:45.760 --> 0:19:48.280
<v Speaker 1>which is where your higher thinking happens, so that you

0:19:48.320 --> 0:19:51.800
<v Speaker 1>are aware of what's going on. There are two interesting

0:19:51.840 --> 0:19:55.800
<v Speaker 1>things about this reward system. Number one, you can hack it.

0:19:56.800 --> 0:19:59.760
<v Speaker 1>Number two, it can be triggered to different degrees by

0:19:59.760 --> 0:20:02.640
<v Speaker 1>your range of things. Let's dig into each of these.

0:20:03.000 --> 0:20:06.720
<v Speaker 1>One it can be hacked. It turns out that it's

0:20:06.760 --> 0:20:10.720
<v Speaker 1>relatively easy to hijack your brain's reward system. For example,

0:20:11.040 --> 0:20:14.480
<v Speaker 1>in one famous experiment in the nineteen fifties, experimenters put

0:20:14.560 --> 0:20:17.880
<v Speaker 1>tiny wires into the brains of rats, placing them directly

0:20:18.040 --> 0:20:21.320
<v Speaker 1>on the VTA region. The wires were programmed to send

0:20:21.359 --> 0:20:24.159
<v Speaker 1>a little jolt of electricity whenever the rats pressed the

0:20:24.240 --> 0:20:27.879
<v Speaker 1>lever it was placed in their cage. This gave the

0:20:27.960 --> 0:20:31.760
<v Speaker 1>rats the ability to self activate their brains reward system.

0:20:32.119 --> 0:20:34.119
<v Speaker 1>As you might imagine, it didn't take long for the

0:20:34.200 --> 0:20:37.800
<v Speaker 1>rats to become obsessed with pressing the lever. They would

0:20:37.840 --> 0:20:40.000
<v Speaker 1>press it over and over to the point where they

0:20:40.000 --> 0:20:44.720
<v Speaker 1>would ignore basic necessities like food, water, and sex. Another

0:20:44.760 --> 0:20:48.480
<v Speaker 1>way to hag their brains reward system is with drugs. Cocaine,

0:20:48.480 --> 0:20:51.280
<v Speaker 1>for example, is a drug derived from the coca plant

0:20:51.480 --> 0:20:55.480
<v Speaker 1>that cleverly circumvents the VTA to sound the this is

0:20:55.520 --> 0:20:59.680
<v Speaker 1>good alarm in your brain. Normally, when dopamine gets released

0:20:59.680 --> 0:21:03.800
<v Speaker 1>by the it eventually gets reabsorbed back into neurons so

0:21:03.840 --> 0:21:08.200
<v Speaker 1>that its effects don't linger. But cocaine blocks at reabsorption,

0:21:08.560 --> 0:21:11.760
<v Speaker 1>keeping the dopamine around so that it continually activates all

0:21:11.800 --> 0:21:14.440
<v Speaker 1>those parts of your brain that tell you something good

0:21:14.560 --> 0:21:18.080
<v Speaker 1>is happening. Number two, it can be triggered by a

0:21:18.200 --> 0:21:22.920
<v Speaker 1>range of things to different degrees. The second interesting thing

0:21:22.920 --> 0:21:25.719
<v Speaker 1>about the brain's reward system is that lots of different

0:21:25.760 --> 0:21:30.560
<v Speaker 1>things seem to activate it. Somehow, evolution has managed to

0:21:30.600 --> 0:21:34.040
<v Speaker 1>wire your brain so that different behaviors, from eating high

0:21:34.119 --> 0:21:37.280
<v Speaker 1>calorie foods to getting a hug from your child, trigger

0:21:37.480 --> 0:21:40.760
<v Speaker 1>this reward system. And this makes sense. In order for

0:21:40.840 --> 0:21:43.399
<v Speaker 1>you to survive and for your genes to survive to

0:21:43.440 --> 0:21:45.600
<v Speaker 1>the next generation, there has to be a way for

0:21:45.680 --> 0:21:48.520
<v Speaker 1>your brain to tell your body when you're doing something

0:21:48.560 --> 0:21:51.880
<v Speaker 1>good that will ensure the survival. In the case of love,

0:21:52.240 --> 0:21:55.119
<v Speaker 1>our evolution has somehow determined that being close to a

0:21:55.200 --> 0:21:58.879
<v Speaker 1>lifelong made and caring for your children, parents, and community

0:21:59.080 --> 0:22:01.919
<v Speaker 1>are good for the cuntnuation of our species. This is

0:22:01.920 --> 0:22:05.680
<v Speaker 1>why love feels good. Your brain rewarding you for behavior

0:22:05.880 --> 0:22:10.200
<v Speaker 1>that benefits future generations of humans. Of course, not everything

0:22:10.240 --> 0:22:13.360
<v Speaker 1>that triggers the reward system does, though to the same degree.

0:22:13.560 --> 0:22:15.680
<v Speaker 1>Most people would agree that eating a piece of cake,

0:22:15.880 --> 0:22:18.600
<v Speaker 1>as delicious as it may be, isn't quite the same

0:22:18.640 --> 0:22:21.600
<v Speaker 1>as finding the love of your life. That's the other

0:22:21.680 --> 0:22:24.840
<v Speaker 1>interesting thing about the reward system. Your brain is wired

0:22:24.880 --> 0:22:28.760
<v Speaker 1>so that different things activated to different extents. Eating a

0:22:28.800 --> 0:22:32.600
<v Speaker 1>tasty cookie that gives your reward system a small nudge mm,

0:22:33.040 --> 0:22:36.000
<v Speaker 1>that's a tasty cookie. Your boyfriend holding back tears as

0:22:36.000 --> 0:22:38.760
<v Speaker 1>he says yes to your marriage proposal. That one lights

0:22:38.800 --> 0:22:41.600
<v Speaker 1>up your reward system like a fireworks display on the

0:22:41.640 --> 0:22:45.000
<v Speaker 1>fourth of July. You might have noticed that the same

0:22:45.119 --> 0:22:48.480
<v Speaker 1>brain circuit that's involved in feelings of love, the reward system,

0:22:48.800 --> 0:22:52.320
<v Speaker 1>is also the same brain circuit that's involved in drug addiction.

0:22:52.840 --> 0:22:57.360
<v Speaker 1>That's because both love and drugs supercharge the reward system,

0:22:58.200 --> 0:23:01.680
<v Speaker 1>and neuroscientists believe that when the war system is hyperactivated,

0:23:02.040 --> 0:23:05.879
<v Speaker 1>it triggers a feedback loop that starts to change your brain.

0:23:07.040 --> 0:23:09.480
<v Speaker 1>We'll card this in more detail in the chapter about addiction,

0:23:09.760 --> 0:23:13.159
<v Speaker 1>but the basic idea is that overwhelming amounts of dopamine

0:23:13.440 --> 0:23:16.600
<v Speaker 1>burn into your brain the desire to seek the source

0:23:16.680 --> 0:23:19.919
<v Speaker 1>of that enjoyment. This is why we crave love and

0:23:20.000 --> 0:23:24.639
<v Speaker 1>sometimes even obsessed about love. Love is like a drug.

0:23:25.359 --> 0:23:27.760
<v Speaker 1>Do you feel like you can't live without your loved ones?

0:23:28.000 --> 0:23:30.560
<v Speaker 1>As the pop singer Robert Palmer famously sang in the

0:23:30.640 --> 0:23:36.200
<v Speaker 1>nineteen eighties, let us bull face it. You're addicted to love. Yes,

0:23:36.240 --> 0:23:38.680
<v Speaker 1>it's true. I'm old enough to remember when that song

0:23:38.880 --> 0:23:41.760
<v Speaker 1>came out on the radio. So one way that scientists

0:23:41.800 --> 0:23:44.959
<v Speaker 1>look at love is as a sort of addiction. It

0:23:45.040 --> 0:23:48.359
<v Speaker 1>engages the same brain circuits, presumably to make sure that

0:23:48.440 --> 0:23:51.760
<v Speaker 1>our species survives. But now the big question is what

0:23:51.960 --> 0:23:55.440
<v Speaker 1>determines who we fall in love with? If love is

0:23:55.480 --> 0:23:59.800
<v Speaker 1>an addiction, what triggers it, Because it's probably not the case.

0:24:00.119 --> 0:24:04.159
<v Speaker 1>You're Madeleine love with everybody in the whole world. So

0:24:04.200 --> 0:24:06.800
<v Speaker 1>when we come back, we'll answer this question, and we'll

0:24:06.800 --> 0:24:09.520
<v Speaker 1>talk about whether you can take a drug that will

0:24:09.640 --> 0:24:12.480
<v Speaker 1>cure you of love or maybe make someone fall in

0:24:12.480 --> 0:24:14.439
<v Speaker 1>love with you. And then at the end, I'm going

0:24:14.480 --> 0:24:17.119
<v Speaker 1>to talk to doctor Godwin about how writing this chapter

0:24:17.440 --> 0:24:21.919
<v Speaker 1>affected our love life, I mean, our respective love lives.

0:24:22.160 --> 0:24:25.360
<v Speaker 1>We don't love working together that much. Stay with us.

0:24:25.800 --> 0:24:41.960
<v Speaker 1>We'll be right back, and we're back. We're talking about

0:24:42.000 --> 0:24:46.000
<v Speaker 1>whether love is an addiction, and the answer is yes,

0:24:47.000 --> 0:24:49.879
<v Speaker 1>sort of. The same brain circuit that makes you feel

0:24:49.880 --> 0:24:52.240
<v Speaker 1>good when you look at your partner, or your kids

0:24:52.359 --> 0:24:55.399
<v Speaker 1>or your besties is basically the same circuit that is

0:24:55.520 --> 0:24:59.119
<v Speaker 1>hijacked during addiction. Now, the question is how do we

0:24:59.160 --> 0:25:02.159
<v Speaker 1>pick who we fall in love with? Is this something

0:25:02.160 --> 0:25:04.760
<v Speaker 1>we can choose. Here's more of my reading from my

0:25:04.880 --> 0:25:10.320
<v Speaker 1>latest nonfiction book, Out of Your Mind, The Bonds of Love.

0:25:11.200 --> 0:25:14.080
<v Speaker 1>One question we haven't answered yet is why do we

0:25:14.160 --> 0:25:16.800
<v Speaker 1>love the people that we do. We know that love

0:25:16.920 --> 0:25:19.880
<v Speaker 1>is a feeling, that this feeling is triggered by your

0:25:19.880 --> 0:25:22.879
<v Speaker 1>brain's reward system, and we know that your brain is

0:25:22.920 --> 0:25:26.959
<v Speaker 1>wired to activate this reward system under certain conditions. But

0:25:27.000 --> 0:25:29.840
<v Speaker 1>what is it about certain people that makes this love them.

0:25:30.240 --> 0:25:32.880
<v Speaker 1>The answer to this question is still largely a mystery

0:25:32.920 --> 0:25:35.600
<v Speaker 1>to neuroscientists. One way to look at it is that

0:25:35.640 --> 0:25:38.639
<v Speaker 1>your reward system gets input from lots of places in

0:25:38.680 --> 0:25:43.159
<v Speaker 1>your brain. Everything from your senses, your memories, your base instincts,

0:25:43.200 --> 0:25:47.000
<v Speaker 1>and your higher thinking areas all feed into this reward system,

0:25:47.760 --> 0:25:50.439
<v Speaker 1>chiming in with an opinion about what they think is

0:25:50.480 --> 0:25:52.720
<v Speaker 1>good for you. And it could be that certain people

0:25:52.880 --> 0:25:58.800
<v Speaker 1>just check all the boxes. Throughout your life, your brain

0:25:58.840 --> 0:26:01.360
<v Speaker 1>has grown and been shaped by your genes and by

0:26:01.359 --> 0:26:05.640
<v Speaker 1>your life experiences. You've developed opinions and likes, and subconscious

0:26:05.680 --> 0:26:09.280
<v Speaker 1>preferences and emotional triggers. All of this has set you

0:26:09.359 --> 0:26:11.760
<v Speaker 1>up so that when you meet certain people, they cause

0:26:11.880 --> 0:26:14.960
<v Speaker 1>multiple areas in your brain to pin your reward system

0:26:15.080 --> 0:26:18.280
<v Speaker 1>at once, sending it the clear signal that somehow this

0:26:18.400 --> 0:26:21.280
<v Speaker 1>is someone that you want to be close to. Of course,

0:26:21.320 --> 0:26:23.560
<v Speaker 1>those of you with kids might be wondering, well, I

0:26:23.600 --> 0:26:26.560
<v Speaker 1>didn't exactly get to choose my kid, and yet I

0:26:26.560 --> 0:26:28.840
<v Speaker 1>still love them with all my heart. And for that

0:26:28.880 --> 0:26:33.440
<v Speaker 1>we have another chemical to thank, oxytocin. Oxytocin is a hormone,

0:26:33.560 --> 0:26:36.119
<v Speaker 1>which means it doesn't just float around your brain. It

0:26:36.119 --> 0:26:38.679
<v Speaker 1>also goes into your blood stream and travels to the

0:26:38.720 --> 0:26:41.399
<v Speaker 1>rest of your body. In particular, it seems to be

0:26:41.440 --> 0:26:44.800
<v Speaker 1>important in establishing the bond between a parent and child.

0:26:45.240 --> 0:26:49.840
<v Speaker 1>Oxotocin is released after warm, positive interactions, especially those ending

0:26:50.040 --> 0:26:54.480
<v Speaker 1>in hugs. For women, oxytocin levels increase as much as

0:26:54.520 --> 0:26:58.600
<v Speaker 1>four times their normal levels. During labor, the active breastfeeding

0:26:58.680 --> 0:27:05.359
<v Speaker 1>also releases oxotocin. What does oxytocin do For one, it

0:27:05.400 --> 0:27:08.480
<v Speaker 1>lowers the level of stress hormones in your body. It

0:27:08.520 --> 0:27:11.679
<v Speaker 1>also turns down the amygdala, which, as we mentioned before,

0:27:12.080 --> 0:27:14.760
<v Speaker 1>is the area that makes you fearful of new situations

0:27:14.840 --> 0:27:19.000
<v Speaker 1>or other people. By suppressing your fear center, oxytocin essentially

0:27:19.080 --> 0:27:22.320
<v Speaker 1>lets your guard down and makes you more open to love.

0:27:22.840 --> 0:27:25.880
<v Speaker 1>Oxytocin also activates what it might be called the mommy

0:27:26.160 --> 0:27:29.359
<v Speaker 1>or daddy area of the brain. This area, called the

0:27:29.480 --> 0:27:33.439
<v Speaker 1>medial pre optic area or MPOA, is a part of

0:27:33.440 --> 0:27:37.480
<v Speaker 1>the brain that controls automatic functions like body temperature, hunger,

0:27:37.640 --> 0:27:41.119
<v Speaker 1>and sleep. We know it's important for parenting behaviors because

0:27:41.160 --> 0:27:44.440
<v Speaker 1>when it's turned off, either by drugs or by damage

0:27:44.440 --> 0:27:49.080
<v Speaker 1>to the brain, these behaviors are interrupted. In experiments, might

0:27:49.080 --> 0:27:52.680
<v Speaker 1>spit out the full use of the MPOA, stop nursing

0:27:52.680 --> 0:27:56.200
<v Speaker 1>their young, and in some cases, even abandon their babies.

0:27:57.200 --> 0:28:00.399
<v Speaker 1>Disturbances in this area in men or women they explain

0:28:00.480 --> 0:28:02.840
<v Speaker 1>why a small percentage of human parents have a hard

0:28:02.840 --> 0:28:05.840
<v Speaker 1>time bonding with their children, or why some don't seem

0:28:05.880 --> 0:28:09.199
<v Speaker 1>to bond at all. Lastly, oxotosin does what you might

0:28:09.240 --> 0:28:12.280
<v Speaker 1>expect to help parents bond with their children. It activates

0:28:12.359 --> 0:28:15.720
<v Speaker 1>the brain's reward system. It turns out that the regions

0:28:15.720 --> 0:28:17.800
<v Speaker 1>of the brains that are part of the reward system

0:28:18.040 --> 0:28:22.360
<v Speaker 1>are also sensitive to oxytocin, so when this hormone gets released,

0:28:22.440 --> 0:28:25.879
<v Speaker 1>it also causes the release of dopamine. And what about

0:28:25.880 --> 0:28:28.800
<v Speaker 1>people who don't report falling head over heels for their partner,

0:28:28.880 --> 0:28:31.800
<v Speaker 1>but grew to love them over time. It turns out

0:28:31.800 --> 0:28:35.119
<v Speaker 1>that oxytocin also plays a role in helping love blossom.

0:28:35.640 --> 0:28:38.000
<v Speaker 1>We know this from studying a cute little animal called

0:28:38.280 --> 0:28:41.120
<v Speaker 1>the prairie role. The prairie role is one of the

0:28:41.200 --> 0:28:44.400
<v Speaker 1>four percent of mammals dead. Like many humans, pair up

0:28:44.400 --> 0:28:47.360
<v Speaker 1>in couples for life to raise their young. Scientists have

0:28:47.360 --> 0:28:50.200
<v Speaker 1>done experiments where the brains of female prairie roles were

0:28:50.200 --> 0:28:54.040
<v Speaker 1>injected with oxytocin. Those that receive the injection were found

0:28:54.080 --> 0:28:56.600
<v Speaker 1>to huddle more with their partners and seem to form

0:28:56.720 --> 0:29:01.920
<v Speaker 1>stronger bonds. In other experiments, scientists blocked oxytocin and found

0:29:01.960 --> 0:29:05.920
<v Speaker 1>that it disrupted how often the wolves formed couples. In humans,

0:29:05.960 --> 0:29:08.720
<v Speaker 1>as in prairie voles, oxytocin is released by your brain

0:29:08.840 --> 0:29:12.080
<v Speaker 1>during sex. It's your body's way of encouraging you to

0:29:12.200 --> 0:29:15.800
<v Speaker 1>form a lasting bond with that person. More interestingly, it

0:29:15.840 --> 0:29:18.120
<v Speaker 1>points to the idea that who we fall in love

0:29:18.160 --> 0:29:22.320
<v Speaker 1>with can be manipulated. For example, increasing the amount of

0:29:22.320 --> 0:29:25.400
<v Speaker 1>oxytocin in your system might lower your guard and make

0:29:25.480 --> 0:29:27.520
<v Speaker 1>you more likely to fall in love with the person

0:29:27.560 --> 0:29:33.480
<v Speaker 1>you're with. Love potion anyone. Alternately, you might be able

0:29:33.520 --> 0:29:37.480
<v Speaker 1>to sour a relationship by somehow disrupting the oxytocin in

0:29:37.560 --> 0:29:41.840
<v Speaker 1>a couple's brains. In fact, recent evidence suggests a species

0:29:41.840 --> 0:29:44.880
<v Speaker 1>of animal very close to us may have taken advantage

0:29:44.880 --> 0:29:48.360
<v Speaker 1>of our oxytocin system to hack their way into our hearts.

0:29:48.720 --> 0:29:50.480
<v Speaker 1>Does your dog really love you?

0:29:51.240 --> 0:29:51.360
<v Speaker 2>Who?

0:29:51.760 --> 0:29:55.040
<v Speaker 1>Over fourteen thousand years ago, some of the first dogs

0:29:55.080 --> 0:29:58.920
<v Speaker 1>were domesticated. This probably happened when bold and less aggressive

0:29:58.920 --> 0:30:04.000
<v Speaker 1>wolves encountered human camps. These early dog like wolves may

0:30:04.040 --> 0:30:06.880
<v Speaker 1>have been more interested in easy snacks and human left

0:30:06.880 --> 0:30:11.160
<v Speaker 1>doors than informing emotional bonds with humans. Since then, the

0:30:11.200 --> 0:30:14.040
<v Speaker 1>traits of many modern dogs had been selected by breeding

0:30:14.160 --> 0:30:18.400
<v Speaker 1>to be perfect pets, docile, attentive, and affectionate. But do

0:30:18.520 --> 0:30:23.720
<v Speaker 1>they really love us? Researcher Takefumi ki Kosui noticed that

0:30:23.840 --> 0:30:26.520
<v Speaker 1>his poodle tear it up when she nurished her puppies

0:30:26.520 --> 0:30:30.120
<v Speaker 1>in a way that indicated a positive emotion. His team

0:30:30.200 --> 0:30:34.120
<v Speaker 1>wondered whether other positive events, like interacting or seeing their

0:30:34.160 --> 0:30:38.640
<v Speaker 1>owner might produce a similar result. In one set of experiments,

0:30:38.680 --> 0:30:42.320
<v Speaker 1>they separated dogs from their owners. After a few hours,

0:30:42.520 --> 0:30:45.360
<v Speaker 1>some of the dogs were reunited with their owners, while

0:30:45.400 --> 0:30:47.960
<v Speaker 1>others were brought to someone who was familiar to them

0:30:48.120 --> 0:30:50.760
<v Speaker 1>but who was not their owner. They found that the

0:30:50.800 --> 0:30:53.560
<v Speaker 1>dogs that reunited with their owners had more tears in

0:30:53.600 --> 0:30:56.720
<v Speaker 1>their eyes than the dogs that didn't reunite with their owners.

0:30:57.280 --> 0:31:00.040
<v Speaker 1>Were these tears of joy that the researchers found it

0:31:00.080 --> 0:31:03.680
<v Speaker 1>prooves that dogs really love us, Oh not so fast.

0:31:05.000 --> 0:31:08.000
<v Speaker 1>In another set of experiments, the team measured how long

0:31:08.120 --> 0:31:11.080
<v Speaker 1>dogs staring at their owners and how that affected the

0:31:11.160 --> 0:31:15.400
<v Speaker 1>owner's oxytocin levels. They found that dogs that gaze at

0:31:15.440 --> 0:31:19.080
<v Speaker 1>their owners longer produce the bigger rise in their owners

0:31:19.200 --> 0:31:23.240
<v Speaker 1>oxytocin levels, and they found that owners would higher oxytocin

0:31:23.360 --> 0:31:26.520
<v Speaker 1>levels were more likely to play with and pet their dogs.

0:31:27.000 --> 0:31:29.400
<v Speaker 1>It could be love, or it could be that dogs

0:31:29.480 --> 0:31:32.720
<v Speaker 1>learned to produce tears to take advantage of our weakness

0:31:32.880 --> 0:31:36.920
<v Speaker 1>for puppy eyes. But whether some dogs really do form

0:31:36.960 --> 0:31:38.959
<v Speaker 1>a bond with us or we're just bred to make

0:31:39.040 --> 0:31:42.240
<v Speaker 1>us feel that way begs the question do we really care?

0:31:43.880 --> 0:31:47.280
<v Speaker 1>We're still learning a lot about oxytocin. For example, one

0:31:47.320 --> 0:31:50.080
<v Speaker 1>recent study suggests that it may also be involved in

0:31:50.200 --> 0:31:54.440
<v Speaker 1>regulating how much we eat, how we process emotions, and

0:31:54.520 --> 0:31:58.480
<v Speaker 1>when our instinct to flea gets activated. Like all hormones,

0:31:58.600 --> 0:32:02.600
<v Speaker 1>oxytocin acts in a mess and imprecise way, affecting lots

0:32:02.600 --> 0:32:05.880
<v Speaker 1>of systems at the same time. Who doesn't love a

0:32:05.920 --> 0:32:10.000
<v Speaker 1>good ending to recap. While writers and poets have been

0:32:10.000 --> 0:32:13.120
<v Speaker 1>trying to understand love for hundreds or thousands of years,

0:32:13.520 --> 0:32:16.640
<v Speaker 1>psychologists and neuroscientists have made great progress in just the

0:32:16.720 --> 0:32:19.560
<v Speaker 1>last few decades. Studies about the scale of love have

0:32:19.720 --> 0:32:22.600
<v Speaker 1>taught us that love is universal and that to some

0:32:22.720 --> 0:32:27.160
<v Speaker 1>degree it can be measured. fMRI brain imaging experiments tell

0:32:27.240 --> 0:32:30.000
<v Speaker 1>us that there are many different brain areas involved in love,

0:32:30.560 --> 0:32:34.280
<v Speaker 1>but the overall picture that emerges is a relatively simple one.

0:32:34.520 --> 0:32:39.680
<v Speaker 1>Love feels good. Therefore, you want more of it. If

0:32:39.760 --> 0:32:42.800
<v Speaker 1>something feels good, especially if it's as powerful as the

0:32:42.840 --> 0:32:45.440
<v Speaker 1>feelings we have towards the people that are close to us,

0:32:45.760 --> 0:32:49.000
<v Speaker 1>your brain wants to repeat it. The reagions that form

0:32:49.040 --> 0:32:51.560
<v Speaker 1>your brain's reward system. Make sure that you are aware

0:32:51.600 --> 0:32:54.320
<v Speaker 1>of this, that you remember it, and it changes your

0:32:54.320 --> 0:32:57.160
<v Speaker 1>brain to want it in your life as much as possible.

0:32:57.760 --> 0:33:00.520
<v Speaker 1>Breaking it down like this may make love seem clinical

0:33:00.840 --> 0:33:03.800
<v Speaker 1>or just about pleasure, but the magic of love is

0:33:03.840 --> 0:33:08.200
<v Speaker 1>in the subtleties the mystery still remains, why do we

0:33:08.240 --> 0:33:12.640
<v Speaker 1>love certain people and not others. Nobody knows what's going

0:33:12.680 --> 0:33:15.120
<v Speaker 1>to make one person stand out among others for that

0:33:15.240 --> 0:33:19.360
<v Speaker 1>initial attraction, and love takes time and patience. It may

0:33:19.400 --> 0:33:22.320
<v Speaker 1>be helped along by brain chemicals and hormones, but it

0:33:22.320 --> 0:33:26.200
<v Speaker 1>requires care for bonds to form and endure, It needs

0:33:26.240 --> 0:33:30.520
<v Speaker 1>effort to grow, and that is something that neuroscience can't predict,

0:33:31.320 --> 0:33:35.560
<v Speaker 1>at least not yet. Maybe in the future, neuroscientists will

0:33:35.600 --> 0:33:38.360
<v Speaker 1>be able to scan your brain and predict who you

0:33:38.360 --> 0:33:40.720
<v Speaker 1>will fall in love with, or they may be able

0:33:40.760 --> 0:33:44.120
<v Speaker 1>to design drugs that can reinforce love in your relationships

0:33:44.680 --> 0:33:48.440
<v Speaker 1>or make you forget relationships that didn't work out. It's

0:33:48.440 --> 0:33:50.720
<v Speaker 1>been a love filled ride, and there's still a lot

0:33:50.800 --> 0:33:53.920
<v Speaker 1>we don't know about love in the brain. As Shakespeare

0:33:53.920 --> 0:33:57.120
<v Speaker 1>wrote in A Midsummer Night's Dream, the course of true

0:33:57.120 --> 0:34:00.560
<v Speaker 1>love never did run smooth. Maybe Shake Spear was a

0:34:00.640 --> 0:34:04.760
<v Speaker 1>neuroscientist after all. Well, it was lovely of you to

0:34:04.840 --> 0:34:07.040
<v Speaker 1>join us. Hey, if you're interested in checking out the

0:34:07.120 --> 0:34:09.360
<v Speaker 1>rest of the book, look for Out of your Mind

0:34:09.600 --> 0:34:13.719
<v Speaker 1>wherever books or audiobooks are sold. Thanks for joining us.

0:34:14.120 --> 0:34:18.839
<v Speaker 1>We'd love to see you again. Next week. You've been

0:34:18.840 --> 0:34:23.520
<v Speaker 1>listening to Science Stuff production of iHeartRadio, written and produced

0:34:23.520 --> 0:34:27.520
<v Speaker 1>by me or Hey Cham, edited by Rose Seguda, executive

0:34:27.520 --> 0:34:31.240
<v Speaker 1>producer Jerry Rowland, and audio engineer and mixer Jasey Peckram.

0:34:31.320 --> 0:34:33.520
<v Speaker 1>And you can follow me on social media. Just search

0:34:33.560 --> 0:34:36.640
<v Speaker 1>for PhD Comics and the name of your favorite platform.

0:34:36.880 --> 0:34:39.799
<v Speaker 1>Be sure to subscribe to Sign Stuff on the iHeartRadio app,

0:34:39.840 --> 0:34:43.080
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts, and please

0:34:43.280 --> 0:34:46.759
<v Speaker 1>tell your friends we'll be back next Wednesday with another episode.

0:34:49.600 --> 0:34:51.680
<v Speaker 1>All right, Well, I would love it if people checked

0:34:51.680 --> 0:34:53.120
<v Speaker 1>out the rest of the book, how about you.

0:34:53.200 --> 0:34:56.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I hope people enjoy it. And I really feel

0:34:56.800 --> 0:35:00.160
<v Speaker 2>that it's important to tell the people that you love

0:35:00.200 --> 0:35:03.640
<v Speaker 2>about the thing that you love. And I feel like

0:35:03.800 --> 0:35:07.440
<v Speaker 2>in writing this book it provided me a way to

0:35:07.600 --> 0:35:12.000
<v Speaker 2>reach out to my family and to friends and bring

0:35:12.000 --> 0:35:15.040
<v Speaker 2>them into my world just a little bit amazing.

0:35:15.520 --> 0:35:17.560
<v Speaker 1>It's an expression of your love for what.

0:35:17.840 --> 0:35:20.239
<v Speaker 2>Of the brain. And I have a special love for

0:35:20.320 --> 0:35:23.520
<v Speaker 2>the brain because it is the essence of what we do.

0:35:23.600 --> 0:35:27.520
<v Speaker 2>It is the place where we go to understand everything.

0:35:28.160 --> 0:35:30.000
<v Speaker 1>Well, thank you for sharing your love of the brain

0:35:30.160 --> 0:35:30.759
<v Speaker 1>with us. Brain.

0:35:31.080 --> 0:35:34.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and you have a love too. You love conveying

0:35:34.840 --> 0:35:38.279
<v Speaker 2>science in a way that is understandable to people, that

0:35:38.400 --> 0:35:41.080
<v Speaker 2>brings them to a better understanding of the world that

0:35:41.120 --> 0:35:44.439
<v Speaker 2>we live in, whether it's your books and physics or

0:35:44.560 --> 0:35:46.719
<v Speaker 2>the book that you did with me, and also just

0:35:46.840 --> 0:35:49.840
<v Speaker 2>the books that you've written that bring young people into

0:35:49.920 --> 0:35:53.360
<v Speaker 2>a better understanding and to find their love in science.

0:35:54.000 --> 0:35:56.280
<v Speaker 2>I think that's probably true of you as well.

0:35:56.680 --> 0:35:58.799
<v Speaker 1>Oh, thank you for saying that, Quene. I love that,

0:35:59.400 --> 0:36:05.960
<v Speaker 1>I love you and I love you man. Awesome. All right,

0:36:06.000 --> 0:36:07.480
<v Speaker 1>that's pretty good. I