WEBVTT - Oracle, OpenAI End Plans to Expand Flagship Data Center

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:13.680
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. Bloomberg Tech is alive

0:00:13.760 --> 0:00:17.520
<v Speaker 1>from coast to coast, with Caroline Hide in New York

0:00:17.840 --> 0:00:22.599
<v Speaker 1>and VLA low into San Francisco.

0:00:23.160 --> 0:00:24.680
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Tech coming up.

0:00:24.720 --> 0:00:27.560
<v Speaker 3>I RAN chooses its new leader as the conflict spreads

0:00:27.600 --> 0:00:30.440
<v Speaker 3>further and sends oil prices jumping us.

0:00:30.480 --> 0:00:34.840
<v Speaker 4>Oracle and OpenAI won't expand a flagship Texas data center

0:00:35.080 --> 0:00:39.040
<v Speaker 4>to two gigawatts. Oracle maintains the BIGAI buildout as intact.

0:00:39.440 --> 0:00:42.360
<v Speaker 3>An n Scale raises two billion dollars in new funding,

0:00:42.479 --> 0:00:46.160
<v Speaker 3>valuing the UK based AI data center developer at fourteen

0:00:46.360 --> 0:00:47.720
<v Speaker 3>zero point six billion dollars.

0:00:48.040 --> 0:00:50.680
<v Speaker 4>But we start ed just broadening the scope of the

0:00:50.680 --> 0:00:52.959
<v Speaker 4>market that we look at. At the moment, we're down

0:00:53.040 --> 0:00:54.760
<v Speaker 4>four tens percent. We are off of our lows and

0:00:54.760 --> 0:00:57.520
<v Speaker 4>the NASBAK one hundred. But once again, the conflict with

0:00:57.560 --> 0:00:59.480
<v Speaker 4>the Middle East, the fact that we're and what with

0:00:59.560 --> 0:01:03.279
<v Speaker 4>the RAN and that continues is still walking markets. We're

0:01:03.280 --> 0:01:05.760
<v Speaker 4>currently up ten percent when you're looking at New York crewed.

0:01:06.040 --> 0:01:07.679
<v Speaker 4>If we're looking at Brent at one point and it

0:01:07.680 --> 0:01:10.520
<v Speaker 4>clicks one hundred and twenty dollars a barrel, there is

0:01:10.640 --> 0:01:13.680
<v Speaker 4>clear fear consuming asset classes that have lost that's six

0:01:13.760 --> 0:01:16.640
<v Speaker 4>trillion since the beginning of the conflict, and therefore we

0:01:16.680 --> 0:01:20.039
<v Speaker 4>want to bring in Bloomberg Washington correspondent Tyler Kendall for

0:01:20.040 --> 0:01:22.039
<v Speaker 4>a little bit more set the scene. What happened a

0:01:22.080 --> 0:01:25.440
<v Speaker 4>new leader and continuing barrage.

0:01:25.959 --> 0:01:28.120
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, Hey Caroline, good morning. While at the moment, it

0:01:28.120 --> 0:01:30.560
<v Speaker 5>doesn't seem like there is any let up when it

0:01:30.600 --> 0:01:33.880
<v Speaker 5>comes to the conflict, and that a diplomatic off ramp

0:01:33.959 --> 0:01:35.959
<v Speaker 5>isn't on the table at the moment. In fact, we

0:01:36.000 --> 0:01:38.920
<v Speaker 5>heard from President Trump over the weekend threatening to widen

0:01:39.120 --> 0:01:41.440
<v Speaker 5>the war. In a post on truth Social he said

0:01:41.440 --> 0:01:44.399
<v Speaker 5>that the US was looking to expand its list of

0:01:44.520 --> 0:01:47.160
<v Speaker 5>targets as the President maintains that he is quote not

0:01:47.360 --> 0:01:50.720
<v Speaker 5>happy with the new Supreme Leader that has been chosen.

0:01:50.840 --> 0:01:53.400
<v Speaker 5>Analysts say that the fact that the sun of the

0:01:53.480 --> 0:01:56.280
<v Speaker 5>late Supreme Leader is now the new one indicates that

0:01:56.320 --> 0:01:59.480
<v Speaker 5>the regime is going to continue its hardline stance. In fact,

0:01:59.480 --> 0:02:02.200
<v Speaker 5>we heard from Iranian state media over the weekend after

0:02:02.240 --> 0:02:04.920
<v Speaker 5>the pick that the government maintains that it has enough

0:02:04.960 --> 0:02:09.480
<v Speaker 5>weapons stockpiles to sustain a high intensity conflict for the

0:02:09.520 --> 0:02:12.079
<v Speaker 5>next six months and that Iran will start to deploy

0:02:12.200 --> 0:02:15.679
<v Speaker 5>more advanced and longer range weapons. Of course, this is

0:02:15.720 --> 0:02:19.680
<v Speaker 5>all contributing to questions about the timeline here and what

0:02:19.760 --> 0:02:22.360
<v Speaker 5>will be sustained disruptions when it comes to the oil

0:02:22.360 --> 0:02:24.840
<v Speaker 5>market caroline. As you know, earlier this morning G seven

0:02:24.880 --> 0:02:28.520
<v Speaker 5>finance ministers had met, but the potential to tap a

0:02:28.600 --> 0:02:33.720
<v Speaker 5>coordinated release of strategic reserves. Ultimately French France's finance minister

0:02:33.840 --> 0:02:36.000
<v Speaker 5>came out and said that the group of countries was

0:02:36.080 --> 0:02:39.160
<v Speaker 5>not there yet, but the option still remains on the table.

0:02:40.000 --> 0:02:43.280
<v Speaker 3>Tyler, the story in markets, stocks and bonds slide, but

0:02:43.440 --> 0:02:46.320
<v Speaker 3>really it's oil. Right, You either look at Brent or

0:02:46.360 --> 0:02:50.480
<v Speaker 3>West Texas. What's the President had to say about what

0:02:50.639 --> 0:02:52.720
<v Speaker 3>is happening in oil markets as a result of the

0:02:52.760 --> 0:02:57.480
<v Speaker 3>conflict in Iran. You know, energy affordability, oil prices a

0:02:57.560 --> 0:03:01.040
<v Speaker 3>thing central to his platform.

0:03:01.440 --> 0:03:04.000
<v Speaker 5>Right, you're really threading the needle there, ed, because at

0:03:04.000 --> 0:03:07.799
<v Speaker 5>this point President Trump has downplayed the oil spike, telling

0:03:07.800 --> 0:03:10.960
<v Speaker 5>Americans to be patient and that ultimately it's not going

0:03:11.000 --> 0:03:13.560
<v Speaker 5>to be long sustained. We heard from the Energy Secretary

0:03:13.560 --> 0:03:15.560
<v Speaker 5>over the weekend in an interview saying that this is

0:03:15.720 --> 0:03:19.000
<v Speaker 5>not a long term conflict and other US officials have

0:03:19.080 --> 0:03:21.040
<v Speaker 5>said that this is going to be a short term

0:03:21.080 --> 0:03:24.320
<v Speaker 5>disruption in order for the long term gain of achieving

0:03:24.360 --> 0:03:27.160
<v Speaker 5>the US's objectives when it comes to Iran. Still, we

0:03:27.280 --> 0:03:29.320
<v Speaker 5>know that the White House has been trying to reassure

0:03:29.320 --> 0:03:32.079
<v Speaker 5>Americans when it comes to the economy before this conflict

0:03:32.360 --> 0:03:35.080
<v Speaker 5>even happened, and now as we see those higher prices

0:03:35.120 --> 0:03:38.560
<v Speaker 5>trickle down to retail gasoline, that's putting the White House

0:03:38.640 --> 0:03:41.960
<v Speaker 5>on the defense. Now our understanding is the administration is

0:03:42.000 --> 0:03:45.560
<v Speaker 5>looking at some potential options to help domestic consumers. There

0:03:45.600 --> 0:03:47.840
<v Speaker 5>had been reporting that the White House was set to

0:03:47.880 --> 0:03:51.760
<v Speaker 5>ask Congress for a gas tax holiday to help lower prices,

0:03:51.760 --> 0:03:54.480
<v Speaker 5>but we haven't really seen that emerge either. It appears

0:03:54.520 --> 0:03:56.560
<v Speaker 5>that the Administration has taken off the table for now

0:03:56.600 --> 0:04:00.600
<v Speaker 5>tapping the Strategic Petroleum Reservement questions about its REPS punishment,

0:04:01.320 --> 0:04:05.040
<v Speaker 5>which was really at this point leaving the administration to

0:04:05.240 --> 0:04:08.320
<v Speaker 5>have to reassure Americans that this ultimately is going to

0:04:08.360 --> 0:04:11.520
<v Speaker 5>be worth the long term success of the military campaign

0:04:11.520 --> 0:04:13.240
<v Speaker 5>and broader peace in the Middle East.

0:04:13.680 --> 0:04:16.359
<v Speaker 3>The President calling one hundred dollars oil a small price

0:04:16.440 --> 0:04:19.240
<v Speaker 3>to pay in the context of getting the war completed.

0:04:19.240 --> 0:04:22.920
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg Stylo Kendl with the latest from DC Oil surges

0:04:22.920 --> 0:04:26.320
<v Speaker 3>past one hundred dollars as Saudi Arabia begins cutting production,

0:04:26.760 --> 0:04:30.440
<v Speaker 3>with storage facilities nearing capacity amid disruptions tied to the

0:04:30.440 --> 0:04:32.760
<v Speaker 3>straight of fuel moves, according.

0:04:32.400 --> 0:04:33.080
<v Speaker 2>To a source.

0:04:33.440 --> 0:04:36.880
<v Speaker 3>For more, let's talk about global energy the upheaval. Julianne Edwards,

0:04:36.920 --> 0:04:40.560
<v Speaker 3>the nuclear company chief development officer, is with us. So this,

0:04:40.760 --> 0:04:43.080
<v Speaker 3>as Tyler put it, is a difficult need order thread

0:04:43.080 --> 0:04:45.800
<v Speaker 3>as well, because you know, long term you're going to

0:04:45.839 --> 0:04:48.720
<v Speaker 3>say that the war in Iram puts a spotlight on

0:04:48.880 --> 0:04:52.200
<v Speaker 3>American energy security. But you also have a firm grasp

0:04:52.240 --> 0:04:54.160
<v Speaker 3>with the data, right So tell us what you on

0:04:54.200 --> 0:04:57.760
<v Speaker 3>your desk are seeing right now in terms of oil

0:04:57.800 --> 0:04:59.800
<v Speaker 3>disruption and oil supply, and then we'll get to.

0:04:59.800 --> 0:05:00.560
<v Speaker 2>The UCULO part.

0:05:01.480 --> 0:05:03.599
<v Speaker 6>Good morning and happy to see you guys this morning

0:05:03.600 --> 0:05:06.599
<v Speaker 6>from our nation's capital. Yes, we are watching the oil

0:05:06.680 --> 0:05:10.599
<v Speaker 6>prices continue to escalate. Our hope is that this will

0:05:10.600 --> 0:05:12.839
<v Speaker 6>have only an indirect effect for a short period of

0:05:12.880 --> 0:05:15.040
<v Speaker 6>time and that we will start to see resolution and

0:05:15.080 --> 0:05:15.800
<v Speaker 6>i RAN soon.

0:05:16.200 --> 0:05:18.760
<v Speaker 7>But that being said, these are long term.

0:05:18.480 --> 0:05:21.800
<v Speaker 6>Decision makings that occur with these infrastructure projects. And so

0:05:22.400 --> 0:05:25.120
<v Speaker 6>the fact is is that these disruptions that we're seeing

0:05:25.120 --> 0:05:28.320
<v Speaker 6>from these geopolitical tensions are going to have a direct

0:05:28.360 --> 0:05:32.640
<v Speaker 6>impact on our energy prices are oil and gas prices domestically,

0:05:33.080 --> 0:05:36.520
<v Speaker 6>and why it's so critical to continue to invest domestically

0:05:36.560 --> 0:05:40.280
<v Speaker 6>in onshore capabilities related to baseload energy, related to on

0:05:40.360 --> 0:05:43.720
<v Speaker 6>shoring and manufacturing so that we're less vulnerable to these

0:05:43.760 --> 0:05:45.640
<v Speaker 6>market disruptions that can help it overseas.

0:05:46.440 --> 0:05:49.640
<v Speaker 3>There's a note out there this morning from Jeffreys saying

0:05:49.640 --> 0:05:53.599
<v Speaker 3>that despite the sort of volatility and uncertainty, clients should

0:05:53.600 --> 0:05:58.200
<v Speaker 3>be encouraged to continue to stick with clean tech, you know,

0:05:58.320 --> 0:06:01.720
<v Speaker 3>renewable tech stocks in that in that instance, do you

0:06:02.279 --> 0:06:04.839
<v Speaker 3>take a sort of reputational hit in the environment like

0:06:04.920 --> 0:06:07.800
<v Speaker 3>this for your industry when there is such a microfocus

0:06:07.839 --> 0:06:08.239
<v Speaker 3>on oil.

0:06:09.360 --> 0:06:13.040
<v Speaker 6>I'm seeing the actual a pivot towards understanding the importance

0:06:13.040 --> 0:06:14.880
<v Speaker 6>of reliability and dependability.

0:06:15.120 --> 0:06:16.800
<v Speaker 7>Nuclear energy has long.

0:06:16.600 --> 0:06:21.200
<v Speaker 6>Been a backbone of our electricity system and producing electrons

0:06:21.240 --> 0:06:23.919
<v Speaker 6>for ninety to ninety five percent of the time, so

0:06:24.040 --> 0:06:26.120
<v Speaker 6>almost twenty four to seven power, and I'm seeing that

0:06:26.120 --> 0:06:29.159
<v Speaker 6>there's more of an understanding and an informative set of

0:06:29.160 --> 0:06:32.600
<v Speaker 6>policy making and tied to that versus its clean air attributes.

0:06:33.320 --> 0:06:35.560
<v Speaker 7>But it is no secret that nuclear energy is a

0:06:35.640 --> 0:06:36.680
<v Speaker 7>zero carbon.

0:06:36.360 --> 0:06:38.920
<v Speaker 6>Source of electrons, but it is a base load source

0:06:38.960 --> 0:06:42.200
<v Speaker 6>that is dependable for sixty eighty years. And we're hoping

0:06:42.200 --> 0:06:44.880
<v Speaker 6>that this administration will continue to a push to investing

0:06:44.960 --> 0:06:47.280
<v Speaker 6>more into that infrastructure so that we can continue to

0:06:47.320 --> 0:06:48.760
<v Speaker 6>be resilient to times like these.

0:06:49.160 --> 0:06:49.480
<v Speaker 8>Jdian.

0:06:50.120 --> 0:06:52.680
<v Speaker 4>How quickly can that sort of energy get online? Because

0:06:52.720 --> 0:06:58.040
<v Speaker 4>you're thinking about how currently useful technology can be deployed,

0:06:58.120 --> 0:07:01.240
<v Speaker 4>how currently useful is any that is an United States.

0:07:01.720 --> 0:07:04.080
<v Speaker 7>These are long term capital projects.

0:07:04.080 --> 0:07:06.279
<v Speaker 6>I mean you're thinking you're looking at roughly two to

0:07:06.360 --> 0:07:09.400
<v Speaker 6>four years for pre development and then roughly a five

0:07:09.440 --> 0:07:11.760
<v Speaker 6>to eight year built cycle before you can put electrons

0:07:11.800 --> 0:07:13.720
<v Speaker 6>on the grid. But we're seeing in China that they're

0:07:13.760 --> 0:07:17.400
<v Speaker 6>able to build nuclear power plants in roughly seven years,

0:07:17.520 --> 0:07:20.080
<v Speaker 6>and so the United States needs needs to keep up

0:07:20.120 --> 0:07:23.680
<v Speaker 6>and ensure that we continue to invest streamline regulatory and

0:07:23.680 --> 0:07:25.800
<v Speaker 6>that's actually why I'm here in our nation's capital today

0:07:26.120 --> 0:07:29.040
<v Speaker 6>at the Regulatory Information Conference, where we're seeing a strong

0:07:29.080 --> 0:07:32.800
<v Speaker 6>push and delivering on this administration's executive orders to have

0:07:32.880 --> 0:07:35.600
<v Speaker 6>more sensible regulations when it comes to nuclear energy.

0:07:36.440 --> 0:07:39.280
<v Speaker 4>Go there about the seven years in China? Is that

0:07:39.400 --> 0:07:43.000
<v Speaker 4>just a quicker turnaround in terms of getting the ability

0:07:43.040 --> 0:07:46.440
<v Speaker 4>the capability of putting it in certain jurisdictions.

0:07:46.560 --> 0:07:48.360
<v Speaker 8>Basically, the regulatory sign off is faster.

0:07:49.400 --> 0:07:50.480
<v Speaker 7>That's a large component.

0:07:50.560 --> 0:07:53.400
<v Speaker 6>You need to have sensible policy making and regulations that

0:07:53.440 --> 0:07:55.560
<v Speaker 6>are applied to these. You also have to have premier

0:07:55.640 --> 0:07:58.000
<v Speaker 6>locations that have access to water and.

0:07:57.960 --> 0:08:00.960
<v Speaker 7>To the grid. And in China that's very much state

0:08:01.040 --> 0:08:01.760
<v Speaker 7>backed program.

0:08:01.840 --> 0:08:04.560
<v Speaker 6>We're in the United States, it's a little bit government endorsed,

0:08:04.560 --> 0:08:07.600
<v Speaker 6>but its industry led. And so we're seeing this administration

0:08:07.920 --> 0:08:11.600
<v Speaker 6>extend things like the investment tax credits, the production tax credits,

0:08:11.840 --> 0:08:14.160
<v Speaker 6>and extending the timeline from the Loan Program Office.

0:08:14.160 --> 0:08:15.920
<v Speaker 7>These are all great things that are going to.

0:08:15.920 --> 0:08:18.480
<v Speaker 6>Enable the industry to keep up with China and making

0:08:18.480 --> 0:08:20.440
<v Speaker 6>sure that we maintain our nuclear dominance.

0:08:21.640 --> 0:08:24.680
<v Speaker 3>In October, we got an eighty billion dollar deal for

0:08:24.800 --> 0:08:28.080
<v Speaker 3>nuclear Right, you are a company that wants to develop

0:08:28.160 --> 0:08:30.480
<v Speaker 3>nuclear reactors. In fact, you're one of the name's few

0:08:30.560 --> 0:08:33.920
<v Speaker 3>names that wants to actually go out and develop a

0:08:34.040 --> 0:08:37.839
<v Speaker 3>big nuclear plant. What progress have you made on that?

0:08:37.920 --> 0:08:41.320
<v Speaker 3>What details can you share? And again in the context

0:08:41.360 --> 0:08:43.439
<v Speaker 3>of what's happening with the war in Iran, how is

0:08:43.480 --> 0:08:45.800
<v Speaker 3>that impacting your ability to execute on it.

0:08:47.000 --> 0:08:49.880
<v Speaker 6>Our company has been laser focused on building the bench

0:08:49.880 --> 0:08:52.679
<v Speaker 6>strength and capability, a muscle that our country actually has

0:08:52.760 --> 0:08:54.960
<v Speaker 6>lost since we have not built any new reactors in

0:08:55.000 --> 0:08:58.280
<v Speaker 6>thirty years, with exception to the two plants down in Georgia.

0:08:58.720 --> 0:09:00.920
<v Speaker 6>So we've been focusing on all the front and loading

0:09:00.960 --> 0:09:06.400
<v Speaker 6>activities required for megaprojects, so citing and characterizing land, making

0:09:06.400 --> 0:09:09.440
<v Speaker 6>sure that we're building out our governance, structure and capability set,

0:09:09.600 --> 0:09:13.000
<v Speaker 6>especially working with the government closely and also working with

0:09:13.040 --> 0:09:16.719
<v Speaker 6>the design firms those design reactors like the ge and

0:09:16.760 --> 0:09:17.839
<v Speaker 6>Westinghouse of the world.

0:09:18.240 --> 0:09:21.839
<v Speaker 4>You've talked about US energy security, talked about how we're

0:09:21.840 --> 0:09:25.240
<v Speaker 4>seeing China revolve. Talked about Europe for a minute here

0:09:25.240 --> 0:09:27.920
<v Speaker 4>because it's interesting on this day. They're pitching an infrastructure

0:09:27.960 --> 0:09:30.720
<v Speaker 4>fund at the moment and billions in terms of almost

0:09:30.720 --> 0:09:33.880
<v Speaker 4>eight hundred and three billion dollars equivalent to try and

0:09:33.920 --> 0:09:36.120
<v Speaker 4>speed up their own infrastructure, maying it clean and make

0:09:36.160 --> 0:09:38.160
<v Speaker 4>it more effective. But how much we see in Europe ever,

0:09:38.160 --> 0:09:39.880
<v Speaker 4>thinking more about nuclear.

0:09:40.280 --> 0:09:43.640
<v Speaker 6>We're seeing a large uptick in activity in nuclear in Europe,

0:09:43.640 --> 0:09:45.600
<v Speaker 6>and I think what's driving a lot of that is

0:09:46.160 --> 0:09:50.640
<v Speaker 6>recognizing that national security and energy security are interconnected.

0:09:51.040 --> 0:09:52.920
<v Speaker 7>We saw this really unfold as.

0:09:52.800 --> 0:09:56.440
<v Speaker 6>They become became more vulnerable during the Ukraine War and

0:09:56.559 --> 0:10:00.520
<v Speaker 6>their overdependence on Russian gas started to create our abilities

0:10:00.520 --> 0:10:01.120
<v Speaker 6>in their system.

0:10:01.240 --> 0:10:03.440
<v Speaker 7>So they want to make sure that they have their.

0:10:03.320 --> 0:10:06.840
<v Speaker 6>Domestic manufacturing capability set for their own energy infrastructure and

0:10:06.920 --> 0:10:09.679
<v Speaker 6>less dependent on neighboring nations. So I think we're going

0:10:09.720 --> 0:10:14.280
<v Speaker 6>to see a rapid incline of building nuclear infrastructure in Europe,

0:10:14.320 --> 0:10:18.160
<v Speaker 6>especially Eastern Europe, and even in the Nordics. We're seeing

0:10:18.200 --> 0:10:22.000
<v Speaker 6>a large amount of activity eyeing to US technology wondering

0:10:22.080 --> 0:10:23.840
<v Speaker 6>when will our technology, if you're writing.

0:10:23.640 --> 0:10:25.800
<v Speaker 7>And how quickly can we export that to those countries.

0:10:26.160 --> 0:10:28.959
<v Speaker 4>Juliana Edwards of the Nuclear Company, thank you so much

0:10:29.000 --> 0:10:32.600
<v Speaker 4>for joining us today from DC. Meanwhile, coming up Ora

0:10:32.679 --> 0:10:36.160
<v Speaker 4>Cool Open AI have scrapped plans to expand the Stargate

0:10:36.240 --> 0:10:39.720
<v Speaker 4>Data Center project. We'll have the details of why and

0:10:39.760 --> 0:10:41.160
<v Speaker 4>what comes next up in the break.

0:10:41.520 --> 0:10:43.080
<v Speaker 8>Is it a break? This is blit a beg tech.

0:10:52.040 --> 0:10:54.960
<v Speaker 3>We have some breaking us crossing the Bloomberg terminal. Anthropic

0:10:55.160 --> 0:10:59.079
<v Speaker 3>has sued the Defense Department over being labeled a supply

0:10:59.240 --> 0:11:03.440
<v Speaker 3>chain risk red headline. Anthropic has sued the Defense Department

0:11:03.480 --> 0:11:05.880
<v Speaker 3>over being labeled supply chain risk, which happened at the

0:11:06.000 --> 0:11:08.719
<v Speaker 3>end of last week. You'll remember that we had reported

0:11:08.720 --> 0:11:12.520
<v Speaker 3>ongoing negotiations between Dario Amma Day, the CEO of and Thropic,

0:11:12.920 --> 0:11:16.080
<v Speaker 3>and the Pentagon and Department of Defense and basically what

0:11:16.120 --> 0:11:19.280
<v Speaker 3>our redlines around Thropic in how their technology is used

0:11:19.480 --> 0:11:22.080
<v Speaker 3>throughout the hour. Carra, I'm sure we'll get more when

0:11:22.120 --> 0:11:24.480
<v Speaker 3>we have for somebody able to come to set and

0:11:24.520 --> 0:11:27.040
<v Speaker 3>we get more details in the suits filing, But that

0:11:27.200 --> 0:11:30.040
<v Speaker 3>is the headline for now. Another story that we are

0:11:30.080 --> 0:11:34.160
<v Speaker 3>across and working on, Oracle and open Ai won't expand

0:11:34.160 --> 0:11:37.720
<v Speaker 3>their flagship Texas data center from one point two gigawatts

0:11:37.760 --> 0:11:41.960
<v Speaker 3>to two gigawatts after negotiations stalled over financing and shifting

0:11:41.960 --> 0:11:45.280
<v Speaker 3>computing needs. Bloomberg reported that story on Friday. The existing

0:11:45.360 --> 0:11:49.080
<v Speaker 3>campus is still being built, an Oracle's broader agreement to

0:11:49.120 --> 0:11:52.160
<v Speaker 3>develop four point five gigawats of data center capacity for

0:11:52.440 --> 0:11:56.200
<v Speaker 3>open Ai remains on track. Developer Cruso is now seeking

0:11:56.200 --> 0:11:59.640
<v Speaker 3>a tenant for the shelved expansion, with Meta in talks

0:12:00.160 --> 0:12:04.199
<v Speaker 3>Nvidia helping facilitate discussions the most Brady Ford part of

0:12:04.240 --> 0:12:05.800
<v Speaker 3>the team that broake the story. A lot of names

0:12:05.800 --> 0:12:08.320
<v Speaker 3>in there, but that's the basics of it, right. There

0:12:08.400 --> 0:12:11.040
<v Speaker 3>was an expansion due to take place one point two

0:12:11.080 --> 0:12:15.560
<v Speaker 3>gig watts. Our understanding is it's not happening. The other details, As.

0:12:15.480 --> 0:12:17.200
<v Speaker 9>You said, it's a lot of names involved here, And

0:12:17.240 --> 0:12:20.200
<v Speaker 9>what this story really shows is that so much money

0:12:20.280 --> 0:12:23.320
<v Speaker 9>is tied up in these huge data center projects that

0:12:23.400 --> 0:12:27.760
<v Speaker 9>require some pretty tight logistics. In this specific case, the

0:12:27.800 --> 0:12:31.280
<v Speaker 9>flagship Stargate data center, they are going to expand it further.

0:12:31.720 --> 0:12:34.800
<v Speaker 9>Whether the negotiations had dragged on for months and months

0:12:34.880 --> 0:12:38.120
<v Speaker 9>and eventually Oracle and OI decided that they're not going

0:12:38.160 --> 0:12:39.840
<v Speaker 9>to take this additional capacity.

0:12:40.520 --> 0:12:44.680
<v Speaker 4>Brady, what has Open AI and indeed Oracle's response been

0:12:44.760 --> 0:12:48.880
<v Speaker 4>to your reporting about how deeply aligned they are on

0:12:49.000 --> 0:12:50.360
<v Speaker 4>continuing to build infrastructure.

0:12:52.080 --> 0:12:55.520
<v Speaker 9>The message we've essentially received is that their overall work

0:12:55.559 --> 0:12:58.800
<v Speaker 9>together is still on track, and that is also our understanding.

0:12:59.360 --> 0:13:02.800
<v Speaker 2>What is it in your regional story? Exactly? Yeah, please

0:13:02.840 --> 0:13:04.480
<v Speaker 2>carry on, yeah, exactly.

0:13:04.920 --> 0:13:08.200
<v Speaker 9>But I think what's interesting is just looking at, you know,

0:13:08.480 --> 0:13:10.360
<v Speaker 9>how do these projects actually play out?

0:13:10.400 --> 0:13:10.559
<v Speaker 2>Right?

0:13:10.600 --> 0:13:14.199
<v Speaker 9>The big contract is there, but certain sites that they

0:13:14.240 --> 0:13:16.880
<v Speaker 9>thought they wanted maybe they don't. Right, and you think

0:13:16.880 --> 0:13:19.479
<v Speaker 9>about all the capital that's tied up in these projects,

0:13:19.840 --> 0:13:21.920
<v Speaker 9>it's interesting to see how these are going to progress.

0:13:22.920 --> 0:13:26.160
<v Speaker 4>Most Bradie forward across that reporting along with Ed Ludlow

0:13:26.520 --> 0:13:27.240
<v Speaker 4>brilliant scoop.

0:13:27.280 --> 0:13:28.080
<v Speaker 8>Thank you very much.

0:13:28.360 --> 0:13:30.680
<v Speaker 4>Let's stick on oracle on the global race to build

0:13:30.679 --> 0:13:34.480
<v Speaker 4>out data centers with Anna Rathman, CEO of Grenadilla Advisory,

0:13:34.520 --> 0:13:37.360
<v Speaker 4>and talk to us about whether or not these sorts

0:13:37.400 --> 0:13:40.520
<v Speaker 4>of stories about the difficulty of actually ensuring you're building

0:13:40.520 --> 0:13:42.840
<v Speaker 4>where you want it, when you want it, it affects

0:13:42.920 --> 0:13:46.080
<v Speaker 4>the overall investment attitude you have towards the data center

0:13:46.080 --> 0:13:46.560
<v Speaker 4>build out.

0:13:48.200 --> 0:13:49.000
<v Speaker 7>Hi, good morning.

0:13:49.520 --> 0:13:51.839
<v Speaker 10>You know these are the type of stories that would

0:13:51.880 --> 0:13:55.559
<v Speaker 10>make the private credit investors a little bit nervous, right

0:13:55.640 --> 0:13:59.920
<v Speaker 10>because our private credit has been really into the infrastructure

0:14:00.040 --> 0:14:03.320
<v Speaker 10>bill out, the big players have been. But if there's

0:14:03.440 --> 0:14:07.880
<v Speaker 10>are hiccups like this where what you intended doesn't actually happen,

0:14:07.960 --> 0:14:11.160
<v Speaker 10>of course meta may be coming in maybe a different story,

0:14:11.960 --> 0:14:15.920
<v Speaker 10>but certainly what happens to your collateral, what happens to

0:14:16.280 --> 0:14:18.400
<v Speaker 10>the project? Is it going to keep going? I mean

0:14:18.480 --> 0:14:21.880
<v Speaker 10>this situation is different. But if it happens again, these

0:14:21.880 --> 0:14:24.080
<v Speaker 10>are the things that make people take a step back

0:14:24.200 --> 0:14:27.040
<v Speaker 10>and take a look at the private credit again.

0:14:27.640 --> 0:14:31.320
<v Speaker 4>And certainly that has an impact on certain stocks like Well, Blue,

0:14:31.320 --> 0:14:33.240
<v Speaker 4>Oul and others that are very much dependent on the

0:14:33.280 --> 0:14:35.400
<v Speaker 4>private credit story. But how much does it affect the

0:14:35.440 --> 0:14:37.600
<v Speaker 4>Oracle story.

0:14:37.640 --> 0:14:40.000
<v Speaker 10>Oh, I think it impacts the Oracle story as well.

0:14:40.080 --> 0:14:42.080
<v Speaker 10>I think this is the type of news that can

0:14:42.160 --> 0:14:46.840
<v Speaker 10>actually have investors actually stop because we're hearing about six

0:14:46.920 --> 0:14:50.360
<v Speaker 10>hundred and fifty billion dollars going into these AI projects, right,

0:14:50.440 --> 0:14:53.240
<v Speaker 10>and we haven't heard of big hiccups like this in

0:14:53.400 --> 0:14:56.760
<v Speaker 10>big names in Oracle and Open AI, and so I

0:14:56.800 --> 0:15:00.120
<v Speaker 10>think people will stopped, be stopping and taking a look

0:15:00.400 --> 0:15:03.840
<v Speaker 10>whether or not this is going to be a more

0:15:03.920 --> 0:15:06.880
<v Speaker 10>widespread thing, right, because there are data centers being built

0:15:06.960 --> 0:15:11.320
<v Speaker 10>everywhere and in some minds indiscriminately, right, So we may

0:15:11.360 --> 0:15:13.400
<v Speaker 10>be hearing more of this, and we may be hearing

0:15:13.440 --> 0:15:15.000
<v Speaker 10>of investors taking a pause.

0:15:16.080 --> 0:15:18.920
<v Speaker 3>The macro point, right, is that there's so much money

0:15:18.960 --> 0:15:22.400
<v Speaker 3>tied up in what is something very complex to achieve

0:15:22.600 --> 0:15:24.920
<v Speaker 3>in terms of the build out. By the way, over

0:15:24.960 --> 0:15:27.920
<v Speaker 3>the weekend prior to the Oracle post, on x. The

0:15:28.000 --> 0:15:31.160
<v Speaker 3>Open AI executive whose response for infrastructure also posts and

0:15:31.240 --> 0:15:34.160
<v Speaker 3>explained they are not proceeding with the expansion there because

0:15:34.200 --> 0:15:36.920
<v Speaker 3>they put the resources into other sites, just as Brody

0:15:37.280 --> 0:15:40.280
<v Speaker 3>had explained in his reporting. But a part of it

0:15:40.320 --> 0:15:42.920
<v Speaker 3>is that capital tied up. I mean, do you see

0:15:42.920 --> 0:15:46.680
<v Speaker 3>that kind of anxiety focus on capital expenditures, focus on

0:15:46.720 --> 0:15:49.520
<v Speaker 3>the credit that's underpinning all of these projects.

0:15:51.240 --> 0:15:52.280
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, I mean there would be.

0:15:52.320 --> 0:15:54.840
<v Speaker 10>But I mean if you're worried about private credit, you

0:15:54.840 --> 0:15:57.120
<v Speaker 10>should also be worried about some of the equity that

0:15:57.240 --> 0:15:59.080
<v Speaker 10>is being tied up, right, I mean, we have to

0:15:59.120 --> 0:16:03.320
<v Speaker 10>think about the cap structure. This is we're I mean,

0:16:03.360 --> 0:16:05.720
<v Speaker 10>I keep saying, we're still in the nascent part of

0:16:05.840 --> 0:16:09.440
<v Speaker 10>AI development, even in the infrastructure part, which is why

0:16:09.200 --> 0:16:12.920
<v Speaker 10>the spend is so high. So it actually makes sense

0:16:13.040 --> 0:16:16.520
<v Speaker 10>that companies can change their minds and perhaps say, Okay,

0:16:16.560 --> 0:16:18.840
<v Speaker 10>we don't need this here anymore. Perhaps we're putting our

0:16:18.880 --> 0:16:23.120
<v Speaker 10>assets over there, and sometimes investors can remain stranded. So

0:16:23.720 --> 0:16:26.080
<v Speaker 10>I just think that this is part of the story

0:16:26.280 --> 0:16:29.080
<v Speaker 10>of being very very early in the AI story.

0:16:30.640 --> 0:16:33.520
<v Speaker 3>One of the considerations of the market this morning as

0:16:33.520 --> 0:16:36.800
<v Speaker 3>it relates to Iran, is just generally, what will happen

0:16:36.840 --> 0:16:41.560
<v Speaker 3>with inflation across everything, energy, materials. You know, that to

0:16:41.600 --> 0:16:43.920
<v Speaker 3>me would really seem to be a factor when you're

0:16:43.920 --> 0:16:47.520
<v Speaker 3>building out massive infrastructure, data center infrastructure across the country,

0:16:47.840 --> 0:16:51.480
<v Speaker 3>to people start to remodel the costs of everything going

0:16:51.520 --> 0:16:52.400
<v Speaker 3>into this build out.

0:16:53.720 --> 0:16:55.880
<v Speaker 10>You know, I think it's too early. I mean it's

0:16:55.880 --> 0:16:59.200
<v Speaker 10>been you know, eight nine days of war. The Trump

0:16:59.280 --> 0:17:02.800
<v Speaker 10>administrations says that it's going to be short term. I

0:17:02.840 --> 0:17:05.080
<v Speaker 10>don't know what that actually means. Does that mean a

0:17:05.119 --> 0:17:08.000
<v Speaker 10>few weeks, a few months, a few days. It is

0:17:08.040 --> 0:17:10.560
<v Speaker 10>sort of a wait and see thing. You know, Kinetic

0:17:10.680 --> 0:17:14.760
<v Speaker 10>war is completely unpredictable because you have people making decisions

0:17:14.800 --> 0:17:18.760
<v Speaker 10>out of existential fear. Right, So it could be tomorrow,

0:17:18.880 --> 0:17:21.280
<v Speaker 10>it could be, you know, several weeks from now. So

0:17:21.640 --> 0:17:23.840
<v Speaker 10>I think it's a little too early to be pricing

0:17:23.880 --> 0:17:27.439
<v Speaker 10>in such high inflation and maybe making changes to the

0:17:27.560 --> 0:17:30.680
<v Speaker 10>underwriting process and the models. It really is a wait

0:17:30.720 --> 0:17:32.680
<v Speaker 10>and see, maybe sometimes even by the hour.

0:17:33.880 --> 0:17:37.000
<v Speaker 3>Anna Rothband of Grende Dillar Advisory, thank you very much.

0:17:37.080 --> 0:17:39.840
<v Speaker 3>Coming up next, we have more details on Anthropics suing

0:17:40.040 --> 0:17:43.160
<v Speaker 3>the Defense Department to carry You're also looking at other names.

0:17:43.000 --> 0:17:45.800
<v Speaker 4>And other legal news, shares of Live Nation actually pushing

0:17:45.840 --> 0:17:48.719
<v Speaker 4>high on five point six percent. This is its ticket

0:17:48.800 --> 0:17:51.920
<v Speaker 4>Master subsidiary, along with Live Nation, have reached a settlement

0:17:52.080 --> 0:17:53.719
<v Speaker 4>with the federal anti trust authorities.

0:17:53.800 --> 0:17:56.840
<v Speaker 8>The dj have been saying this Monday. It kind of.

0:17:56.760 --> 0:17:58.359
<v Speaker 4>Throws a bit of a wrench in to this mid

0:17:58.440 --> 0:18:01.439
<v Speaker 4>trial of an anti trust case. It accuse the company,

0:18:01.480 --> 0:18:05.680
<v Speaker 4>remember of illegally monopolizing the lie music industry.

0:18:05.920 --> 0:18:07.080
<v Speaker 8>As a Bloomberg Tech.

0:18:16.400 --> 0:18:19.240
<v Speaker 3>Back to the breaking news just moments ago, Anthropic is

0:18:19.280 --> 0:18:21.959
<v Speaker 3>suing the Defense Department after it was labeled a supply

0:18:22.080 --> 0:18:25.960
<v Speaker 3>chain risk, a designation usually reserved for foreign advasarys. Let's

0:18:26.000 --> 0:18:28.840
<v Speaker 3>get to our AI editor Bloomberg Seth Figureman for more,

0:18:28.880 --> 0:18:31.480
<v Speaker 3>and actually, what it is that Entropics challenging, it would

0:18:31.480 --> 0:18:35.600
<v Speaker 3>appear from the suits, is the Department's decision to shift

0:18:36.920 --> 0:18:38.120
<v Speaker 3>the contracts to others.

0:18:38.200 --> 0:18:38.680
<v Speaker 2>Essentially.

0:18:39.280 --> 0:18:42.359
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, and what we're hearing from Anthropic here in a

0:18:42.359 --> 0:18:46.200
<v Speaker 11>statement as they're taking this step to protect their customers

0:18:46.760 --> 0:18:50.159
<v Speaker 11>and their business. At the same time, though, they're telling

0:18:50.240 --> 0:18:53.560
<v Speaker 11>us that they intend to pursue all avenues here to

0:18:54.400 --> 0:18:58.440
<v Speaker 11>track immediate this relationship with the government, including direct conversation

0:18:58.960 --> 0:19:02.399
<v Speaker 11>with the government. So they're not foreclosing the continuation and

0:19:02.440 --> 0:19:04.560
<v Speaker 11>talks here, but they are still pursuing litigation.

0:19:05.240 --> 0:19:08.919
<v Speaker 4>These actions are unprecedented and unlawful, the company said in

0:19:09.280 --> 0:19:12.280
<v Speaker 4>the complaint that was filed over in San Francisco Federal court,

0:19:12.440 --> 0:19:14.480
<v Speaker 4>and they say the constitution does not allow for the

0:19:14.520 --> 0:19:17.080
<v Speaker 4>government to wield its enormous power to punish a company

0:19:17.080 --> 0:19:19.520
<v Speaker 4>for its protected speech. What's been so extraordinary is the

0:19:19.560 --> 0:19:22.920
<v Speaker 4>way in which anthropobists continue to speak out against the government.

0:19:23.080 --> 0:19:25.600
<v Speaker 4>Dario Amade basically told us already he was going to

0:19:25.600 --> 0:19:26.120
<v Speaker 4>go and do this.

0:19:26.240 --> 0:19:26.600
<v Speaker 2>That's right.

0:19:26.680 --> 0:19:29.200
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, they're clearly being outspoken and taking a stand on

0:19:29.200 --> 0:19:31.200
<v Speaker 11>this issue here. They're not just taking this sitting down.

0:19:31.280 --> 0:19:33.679
<v Speaker 11>But it's clear behind the scenes that the tone might

0:19:33.720 --> 0:19:36.720
<v Speaker 11>be a little bit different privately, but they're looking for

0:19:36.720 --> 0:19:38.639
<v Speaker 11>a resolution. They're also not looking to just take this,

0:19:38.920 --> 0:19:39.920
<v Speaker 11>you know, sitting down.

0:19:40.920 --> 0:19:43.200
<v Speaker 3>A part of what's happened in parallel stef in recent

0:19:43.280 --> 0:19:46.520
<v Speaker 3>days is that, you know, Open AI has negotiated with

0:19:46.640 --> 0:19:50.439
<v Speaker 3>the Department of Defense, you know, basically to come in,

0:19:50.520 --> 0:19:53.199
<v Speaker 3>do we know what the status quo is now, what

0:19:53.240 --> 0:19:56.520
<v Speaker 3>the latest is in where the department stands on its

0:19:56.560 --> 0:19:58.440
<v Speaker 3>AI tool policy, and who it's using.

0:19:58.560 --> 0:20:00.560
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, I mean, the last we've heard is has been

0:20:00.560 --> 0:20:03.560
<v Speaker 11>seeking additional protections and safeguards for some of the same

0:20:03.600 --> 0:20:07.320
<v Speaker 11>concerns that Anthropic I previously raised publicly and privately. We

0:20:07.359 --> 0:20:10.560
<v Speaker 11>don't know yet if the Pentagon has agreed to all

0:20:10.600 --> 0:20:13.200
<v Speaker 11>those provisions, but it does seem that the tenor of

0:20:13.240 --> 0:20:15.880
<v Speaker 11>the debate between Opening AI and the Defense Department has

0:20:15.920 --> 0:20:18.520
<v Speaker 11>been much more civil in some respects and what we've

0:20:18.520 --> 0:20:19.280
<v Speaker 11>seen with Anthropic.

0:20:19.560 --> 0:20:21.560
<v Speaker 4>But what about the reporting of how this is affecting

0:20:21.600 --> 0:20:24.199
<v Speaker 4>those that work for the businesses. A lot of these

0:20:24.240 --> 0:20:26.199
<v Speaker 4>compans who say they're nothing without their talent, and we

0:20:26.240 --> 0:20:28.639
<v Speaker 4>already know a key senior Open AI leader and the

0:20:28.720 --> 0:20:29.880
<v Speaker 4>robotics department is left.

0:20:29.960 --> 0:20:31.240
<v Speaker 11>Yeah. I think we're still waiting to see if there's

0:20:31.240 --> 0:20:33.800
<v Speaker 11>a meaningful attrition from either or both companies as a

0:20:33.800 --> 0:20:36.760
<v Speaker 11>result of the uncertainty and tension here at the moment. Yes,

0:20:36.800 --> 0:20:38.920
<v Speaker 11>there's one high profile example over the weekend, but we

0:20:39.000 --> 0:20:41.280
<v Speaker 11>haven't yet seen others, And of course we're still waiting

0:20:41.320 --> 0:20:43.280
<v Speaker 11>to see on the customer side of things, or people

0:20:43.359 --> 0:20:46.480
<v Speaker 11>rallying to the defense of Anthropic for taking the stand,

0:20:46.560 --> 0:20:48.440
<v Speaker 11>or are they at risk of losing more business even

0:20:48.520 --> 0:20:51.760
<v Speaker 11>if they're not legally required to cut business with Anthropic,

0:20:51.880 --> 0:20:52.760
<v Speaker 11>might some still do it?

0:20:53.800 --> 0:20:55.560
<v Speaker 3>So, if we're going back to a question that we've

0:20:55.560 --> 0:20:57.639
<v Speaker 3>asked you and your team will report is quite a

0:20:57.640 --> 0:20:59.800
<v Speaker 3>lot recently. But do we have any sense of like

0:21:00.160 --> 0:21:03.600
<v Speaker 3>how important from a financial standpoint a deal with the

0:21:03.640 --> 0:21:06.560
<v Speaker 3>Defense Department actually ates to Anthropic or open AI, like

0:21:06.600 --> 0:21:08.720
<v Speaker 3>you say, a major part of their business we're fighting

0:21:08.720 --> 0:21:09.399
<v Speaker 3>for sorry now.

0:21:09.400 --> 0:21:11.919
<v Speaker 11>Of course, now from a pure dollars perspective, it seems

0:21:12.080 --> 0:21:15.080
<v Speaker 11>pretty marginal. At least at the current moment. The Anthropic

0:21:15.119 --> 0:21:17.760
<v Speaker 11>Pentagon deal was worth up to two hundred million, but

0:21:17.840 --> 0:21:20.080
<v Speaker 11>our understanding from procurement records was that it was really

0:21:20.080 --> 0:21:22.080
<v Speaker 11>just a couple of million to day. That's good to

0:21:22.080 --> 0:21:23.720
<v Speaker 11>think about how much a might have been over the

0:21:23.760 --> 0:21:27.560
<v Speaker 11>long term. And again, the larger blast radius of customers

0:21:27.600 --> 0:21:30.200
<v Speaker 11>who either legally might feel that they can't do visits

0:21:30.240 --> 0:21:33.359
<v Speaker 11>with Anthropic now or just optically or for fear pressure

0:21:33.359 --> 0:21:35.840
<v Speaker 11>from the administration might rethink how much they commit. So

0:21:35.920 --> 0:21:37.360
<v Speaker 11>that is much harder to quantify.

0:21:38.040 --> 0:21:41.520
<v Speaker 4>We've obviously putting all of this in the context of

0:21:41.880 --> 0:21:43.919
<v Speaker 4>an actual war that seems to have erupted over the

0:21:43.920 --> 0:21:46.919
<v Speaker 4>course of the internal dialogue that we're having between Anthropic

0:21:47.000 --> 0:21:49.560
<v Speaker 4>or AI providers in the military in the United States.

0:21:49.680 --> 0:21:52.240
<v Speaker 4>Is this something that is happening abroad as well? Is

0:21:52.240 --> 0:21:55.119
<v Speaker 4>it something that is causing tension about use of AI

0:21:55.560 --> 0:21:56.920
<v Speaker 4>in Europe and elsewhere.

0:21:57.160 --> 0:21:58.479
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, I don't know if we've seen it play out

0:21:58.520 --> 0:22:00.440
<v Speaker 11>quite the same way as it has here. I think

0:22:00.440 --> 0:22:03.240
<v Speaker 11>that question of how who has a say over this

0:22:03.320 --> 0:22:06.560
<v Speaker 11>powerful technology, how much can the government dictate the way

0:22:06.640 --> 0:22:09.119
<v Speaker 11>that gets used, and how much can they force private

0:22:09.119 --> 0:22:11.359
<v Speaker 11>companies to sort of cow to that, I think that

0:22:11.520 --> 0:22:13.639
<v Speaker 11>is a very much a global debate. It's just taking

0:22:13.680 --> 0:22:16.160
<v Speaker 11>place here in a more prominent way. And these are

0:22:16.200 --> 0:22:18.840
<v Speaker 11>the companies at the forefront of that technology.

0:22:18.359 --> 0:22:19.680
<v Speaker 8>And American companies of that.

0:22:20.040 --> 0:22:24.400
<v Speaker 4>Soeth Figermann across the breaking news, of course, has anticipated.

0:22:24.440 --> 0:22:29.040
<v Speaker 4>Anthropic is indeed suing the US government. Coming up, we

0:22:29.160 --> 0:22:32.200
<v Speaker 4>go back to Iran after it destroyed a key million

0:22:32.520 --> 0:22:37.040
<v Speaker 4>radar system to guide US missile defenses in the Gulf.

0:22:37.040 --> 0:22:39.000
<v Speaker 8>That is next, and this is Bloomberg Tech.

0:22:47.560 --> 0:22:48.960
<v Speaker 2>Welcome back to Bloomberg Tech.

0:22:49.080 --> 0:22:52.560
<v Speaker 3>Over the last hour, equity markets technology shares in particular,

0:22:52.640 --> 0:22:55.240
<v Speaker 3>actually raised a lot of the declines that we saw

0:22:55.480 --> 0:22:57.560
<v Speaker 3>earlier in the session, and that's that one hundred is

0:22:57.560 --> 0:23:01.600
<v Speaker 3>now effectively flat. The story with regards to what's happening

0:23:01.640 --> 0:23:05.000
<v Speaker 3>to the ongoing war in Iran is once again oil.

0:23:05.560 --> 0:23:07.760
<v Speaker 3>You're looking at New York crewed at ninety five ninety

0:23:07.760 --> 0:23:10.080
<v Speaker 3>six dollars a barrel, but at one point above one

0:23:10.119 --> 0:23:12.560
<v Speaker 3>hundred dollars a barrel Brent similar picture up to one

0:23:12.600 --> 0:23:16.280
<v Speaker 3>twenty down to one hundred. Partly disruption and partly the

0:23:16.320 --> 0:23:19.439
<v Speaker 3>market trying to interpret how long this will go on

0:23:19.560 --> 0:23:22.560
<v Speaker 3>for you know, the administration is Tyler Kendall outlined earlier,

0:23:22.800 --> 0:23:26.320
<v Speaker 3>thinking and communicating it will be short, but actually a

0:23:26.359 --> 0:23:27.720
<v Speaker 3>lot of evidence to the country.

0:23:27.480 --> 0:23:31.200
<v Speaker 4>Carract Yeah, disruption and destruction because Iran has destroyed a

0:23:31.280 --> 0:23:34.160
<v Speaker 4>key three hundred million dollar radar system used to guide

0:23:34.280 --> 0:23:36.919
<v Speaker 4>US missile defenses in the Gulf. And that's according to

0:23:36.920 --> 0:23:39.720
<v Speaker 4>a US official, it's a blow the cold widen gaps

0:23:39.720 --> 0:23:42.000
<v Speaker 4>in the region's ability to counterfeuture attacks.

0:23:42.200 --> 0:23:43.640
<v Speaker 8>For more, Bloombair Defense.

0:23:43.400 --> 0:23:46.760
<v Speaker 4>Editor Jerry Doyle joins, US just give us the context,

0:23:46.840 --> 0:23:50.680
<v Speaker 4>because we're not suddenly completely down by defense systems here, Jerry.

0:23:50.720 --> 0:23:52.359
<v Speaker 8>But it is a key target that was managed to

0:23:52.359 --> 0:23:53.080
<v Speaker 8>be struck.

0:23:55.359 --> 0:23:55.800
<v Speaker 2>That's right.

0:23:55.960 --> 0:23:58.480
<v Speaker 12>It was the one that we know that was destroyed

0:23:59.000 --> 0:24:02.080
<v Speaker 12>was located in enjoyed as part of the bad radar battery.

0:24:02.240 --> 0:24:06.000
<v Speaker 12>Now that that is called terminal high altitude air defense, right,

0:24:06.000 --> 0:24:09.760
<v Speaker 12>It's meant to shoot down advanced ballistic missiles traveling extremely

0:24:09.800 --> 0:24:14.400
<v Speaker 12>fast above the atmosphere, and the radar guides these missiles

0:24:14.840 --> 0:24:19.320
<v Speaker 12>and has an extremely high resolution, can spot targets extremely

0:24:19.359 --> 0:24:22.359
<v Speaker 12>long ranges. It's very useful, very high power, very expensive.

0:24:22.760 --> 0:24:26.480
<v Speaker 12>Now with that radar gone, the bad battery is still operational.

0:24:26.560 --> 0:24:29.119
<v Speaker 12>It just had to take queuing from other US advanced radars,

0:24:29.200 --> 0:24:33.000
<v Speaker 12>such as those that work with the nearby Patriot missile systems.

0:24:34.280 --> 0:24:37.840
<v Speaker 3>Jerry on Blueberg Tech, We've been looking at technology on

0:24:37.880 --> 0:24:38.840
<v Speaker 3>the battlefield.

0:24:38.920 --> 0:24:39.440
<v Speaker 2>Essentially.

0:24:39.760 --> 0:24:42.160
<v Speaker 3>One of the data sets that Bloomberg has been tracking

0:24:42.320 --> 0:24:47.119
<v Speaker 3>is Iran's use of drones, particularly against what are neighboring

0:24:47.240 --> 0:24:50.080
<v Speaker 3>countries in the Gulf. What is the latest data tell

0:24:50.160 --> 0:24:54.520
<v Speaker 3>us about Iran's munition stockpile, where they are in their

0:24:54.600 --> 0:24:57.000
<v Speaker 3>use of drones versus ballistic missiles, etc.

0:24:58.800 --> 0:25:02.119
<v Speaker 12>Well, to some degree, it's impossible to say, you know

0:25:02.400 --> 0:25:06.639
<v Speaker 12>how many drones Iran has left, whether the temple of

0:25:06.680 --> 0:25:09.400
<v Speaker 12>operations has slowed down because they simply don't have as

0:25:09.400 --> 0:25:12.880
<v Speaker 12>many ammunitions. Whether their commund and communications have been disrupted

0:25:12.880 --> 0:25:17.600
<v Speaker 12>from strikes, whether production has been disrupted, whether they're husbanding

0:25:17.600 --> 0:25:20.560
<v Speaker 12>their resources for a larger attack, is really difficult to say.

0:25:20.880 --> 0:25:24.400
<v Speaker 12>We can, however, say that the number of strikes has

0:25:24.480 --> 0:25:26.760
<v Speaker 12>decreased quite a bit from the opening days of the war,

0:25:27.080 --> 0:25:29.640
<v Speaker 12>and that Iran has started to rely more heavily on

0:25:29.720 --> 0:25:32.439
<v Speaker 12>the use of these Shah had one thirty six drones,

0:25:32.440 --> 0:25:36.240
<v Speaker 12>which are essentially low cost, rudimentary cruise missiles as opposed

0:25:36.240 --> 0:25:41.439
<v Speaker 12>to using more expensive long range ballistic missiles which Iran

0:25:41.560 --> 0:25:43.800
<v Speaker 12>started the war was somewhere in the neighborhood of two

0:25:43.800 --> 0:25:46.800
<v Speaker 12>thousand to twenty five hundred of but clearly has many

0:25:46.840 --> 0:25:49.439
<v Speaker 12>fewer now, Jerry.

0:25:49.440 --> 0:25:52.320
<v Speaker 3>The market's also trying to interpret long term how this

0:25:52.520 --> 0:25:56.040
<v Speaker 3>changes the defense technology industry. There's a note from Turis,

0:25:56.080 --> 0:25:59.199
<v Speaker 3>for example, that puts the spotlight on the use of

0:25:59.480 --> 0:26:02.959
<v Speaker 3>autonomous maritime technology in the context of the war of Iran.

0:26:03.320 --> 0:26:06.080
<v Speaker 3>For you and the team at Bloomberg across the defense desk, like,

0:26:06.080 --> 0:26:07.960
<v Speaker 3>what are we seeing? What are some of the stories

0:26:08.000 --> 0:26:09.520
<v Speaker 3>coming out of this conflict?

0:26:11.119 --> 0:26:13.760
<v Speaker 12>Well, so far we haven't seen, as far as I know,

0:26:13.960 --> 0:26:19.000
<v Speaker 12>the use of autonomous maritime strike platforms in the Persian Golf.

0:26:19.560 --> 0:26:21.840
<v Speaker 12>We have seen those obviously use quite a bit in

0:26:21.880 --> 0:26:24.040
<v Speaker 12>the Ukraine War, so we know they can be effective,

0:26:24.080 --> 0:26:26.439
<v Speaker 12>and we know they can be built relatively cheaply and

0:26:26.520 --> 0:26:29.320
<v Speaker 12>operated in sort of an ad hoc way, again to

0:26:29.400 --> 0:26:33.920
<v Speaker 12>great effect. It's not clear how many of these Iran has,

0:26:34.080 --> 0:26:36.040
<v Speaker 12>or how it might be able to deploy them, or

0:26:36.080 --> 0:26:39.320
<v Speaker 12>whether the US has destroyed them over the course of

0:26:39.440 --> 0:26:42.680
<v Speaker 12>strikes in the last week, but platforms like those would

0:26:42.720 --> 0:26:47.240
<v Speaker 12>be extremely useful in a scenario which Iran finds itself

0:26:47.320 --> 0:26:49.359
<v Speaker 12>in right now, where it's trying to shut down a

0:26:49.400 --> 0:26:53.000
<v Speaker 12>waterway and narrow waterway like the Strait of Homos. Obviously,

0:26:53.040 --> 0:26:56.399
<v Speaker 12>we've seen a lot of autonomous aerial platforms such as

0:26:56.440 --> 0:26:59.520
<v Speaker 12>Ahead one thirty six drones, which have been used in

0:26:59.600 --> 0:27:03.040
<v Speaker 12>strikes all across the Gulf. Those are not controlled by

0:27:03.040 --> 0:27:06.359
<v Speaker 12>the ground but are guided by GPS technology. They're fairly

0:27:06.440 --> 0:27:10.600
<v Speaker 12>easy to make, fairly cheap to produce in large numbers,

0:27:10.760 --> 0:27:13.960
<v Speaker 12>and we've actually seen in this war the US use

0:27:14.119 --> 0:27:16.880
<v Speaker 12>its own version of the Shahead one thirty six. It's

0:27:16.960 --> 0:27:23.000
<v Speaker 12>called Lucas I believe a long range unmanned combat aerial system,

0:27:23.119 --> 0:27:25.800
<v Speaker 12>I think is what that's a strange acronym for. But

0:27:25.840 --> 0:27:28.359
<v Speaker 12>we've seen that use and the US of course has

0:27:28.440 --> 0:27:31.480
<v Speaker 12>plans to manufacture these at scale and use them in

0:27:31.520 --> 0:27:33.640
<v Speaker 12>a way that Iran sort of is to use them

0:27:33.640 --> 0:27:37.199
<v Speaker 12>to overwhelm or confuse or deplete enemy air defenses or

0:27:37.240 --> 0:27:41.120
<v Speaker 12>enemy defenses in general, in advance of a more advance

0:27:41.240 --> 0:27:44.199
<v Speaker 12>or higher end type strike bimbag defense out.

0:27:44.240 --> 0:27:46.440
<v Speaker 3>It's a Jerry Doyle, thank you very much, Caro. Plenty

0:27:46.480 --> 0:27:47.760
<v Speaker 3>more news headlines today.

0:27:47.720 --> 0:27:49.640
<v Speaker 8>There are ed and it's time now for talking tech.

0:27:49.640 --> 0:27:52.440
<v Speaker 4>And first up, the head of Open a Eyes Robotics team,

0:27:52.600 --> 0:27:56.560
<v Speaker 4>Caitlin Kalinowski, resigned Saturday. So I think companies deal to

0:27:56.600 --> 0:28:00.800
<v Speaker 4>deploy its AI models when then Pentdican's classified network. Kalanowski

0:28:00.840 --> 0:28:02.639
<v Speaker 4>said in a post on x and on LinkedIn that

0:28:02.680 --> 0:28:07.760
<v Speaker 4>those issues needed quote more deliberation before signing the deal. Plus,

0:28:07.760 --> 0:28:10.400
<v Speaker 4>Ceubrus has picked Morgan Stanley to lead as IBO. That's

0:28:10.400 --> 0:28:12.320
<v Speaker 4>according to sources who say Cerebras says.

0:28:12.280 --> 0:28:14.320
<v Speaker 8>Filed fresh paperwork for the IPO and.

0:28:14.440 --> 0:28:17.280
<v Speaker 4>Is set to meet with analysts and prospective investors this month.

0:28:17.560 --> 0:28:19.680
<v Speaker 4>The offering could raise about two billion dollars in a

0:28:19.760 --> 0:28:23.439
<v Speaker 4>listing as soon as April, and ten Cent it doesn't

0:28:23.480 --> 0:28:26.520
<v Speaker 4>tend to invest several one hundred million dollars in Paramount's

0:28:26.520 --> 0:28:29.720
<v Speaker 4>acquisision of Warner Brothers Discovery, according to sources who say

0:28:29.720 --> 0:28:33.560
<v Speaker 4>the Chinese company would be acting as a passive financial investor,

0:28:33.760 --> 0:28:36.120
<v Speaker 4>though it might still decide not to invest. Ten Cent

0:28:36.160 --> 0:28:37.720
<v Speaker 4>and Paramount declined to commentment.

0:28:38.960 --> 0:28:41.240
<v Speaker 3>Okay, coming up, we're going to discuss how AI is

0:28:41.240 --> 0:28:45.160
<v Speaker 3>shaking up the legal profession with Harvey CEO Winston Weinberg.

0:28:45.240 --> 0:28:52.600
<v Speaker 2>That's next. This is Bloomberg Tech Harvey.

0:28:52.800 --> 0:28:54.760
<v Speaker 4>You know it is the AI platform for the legal

0:28:54.800 --> 0:28:58.720
<v Speaker 4>profession today unveiling new tool to let law firms build

0:28:58.760 --> 0:29:01.960
<v Speaker 4>custom AI agents even faster that should give more control

0:29:02.080 --> 0:29:05.720
<v Speaker 4>over multi step processes they ask AI to complete. Let's

0:29:05.720 --> 0:29:08.760
<v Speaker 4>discuss with Harvey's co founder and CEO, Sin Weinberg and Whinson.

0:29:08.960 --> 0:29:11.320
<v Speaker 4>What's so interesting is about the human in the loop,

0:29:11.360 --> 0:29:14.360
<v Speaker 4>the oversight, the control. How do they maintain that when

0:29:14.400 --> 0:29:16.400
<v Speaker 4>you're leaving AI agents to go and do work for

0:29:16.520 --> 0:29:17.480
<v Speaker 4>multi step processes.

0:29:17.600 --> 0:29:20.080
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, thank you so much for having me. I'm excited

0:29:20.120 --> 0:29:22.320
<v Speaker 13>to be here. Also for legal Week, which has basically

0:29:22.400 --> 0:29:24.360
<v Speaker 13>all of the legal tech industry in New York for

0:29:25.040 --> 0:29:28.000
<v Speaker 13>one gathering. The way that we think about it is

0:29:28.000 --> 0:29:31.120
<v Speaker 13>in law. It's incredibly complex and it's multiplayer. And so

0:29:31.160 --> 0:29:33.520
<v Speaker 13>if you're building this agentic system that is kind of

0:29:33.560 --> 0:29:36.520
<v Speaker 13>the infrastructure for completing legal work, you need it to

0:29:36.560 --> 0:29:39.280
<v Speaker 13>be able to actually interact with all of the different

0:29:39.280 --> 0:29:42.760
<v Speaker 13>specialized agents to do that task. The multiple law firms

0:29:42.800 --> 0:29:45.960
<v Speaker 13>working on a project, and the Fortune five hundred that

0:29:46.040 --> 0:29:48.400
<v Speaker 13>is thinking about buying another company or involved in a

0:29:48.440 --> 0:29:50.760
<v Speaker 13>litigation or something like that. And so it's a really

0:29:50.840 --> 0:29:54.640
<v Speaker 13>complex process of integrating with all the correct data, having

0:29:54.680 --> 0:29:56.360
<v Speaker 13>the humans in the loop when they need to be,

0:29:56.480 --> 0:29:59.640
<v Speaker 13>and handing off between the different experts that are specialists

0:29:59.720 --> 0:30:00.960
<v Speaker 13>in that particular domain.

0:30:01.120 --> 0:30:03.479
<v Speaker 4>Let's talk about your specialization and the fact that you

0:30:03.520 --> 0:30:06.440
<v Speaker 4>have all these integrations and have such a wide scope

0:30:06.440 --> 0:30:09.200
<v Speaker 4>of legal companies you're already working with. Because the age

0:30:09.240 --> 0:30:12.840
<v Speaker 4>old criticism is you're just a wrapper of GPT or

0:30:12.880 --> 0:30:16.320
<v Speaker 4>whether it's anthropic, you're agnostic to the model's underlying How

0:30:16.360 --> 0:30:19.240
<v Speaker 4>are you making yourself so necessary for the legal profession?

0:30:19.320 --> 0:30:21.560
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, the best way to think about this is in

0:30:21.600 --> 0:30:25.520
<v Speaker 13>these incredibly highly regulated industries, the work that they have

0:30:25.560 --> 0:30:28.120
<v Speaker 13>to do is very complex, and all the data is

0:30:28.120 --> 0:30:30.880
<v Speaker 13>in all these different silos, right, and again it's multi

0:30:30.880 --> 0:30:33.320
<v Speaker 13>party and collaborative, and so what you need to solve

0:30:33.480 --> 0:30:35.920
<v Speaker 13>is which model is the best for this particular part

0:30:35.920 --> 0:30:37.840
<v Speaker 13>of a task, how do you route that to the

0:30:37.920 --> 0:30:40.560
<v Speaker 13>human And then what's going to become really important is

0:30:40.600 --> 0:30:43.760
<v Speaker 13>how do you actually review all those outputs and evaluate

0:30:43.800 --> 0:30:46.000
<v Speaker 13>them for accuracy. If you think about what's going to

0:30:46.000 --> 0:30:48.680
<v Speaker 13>happen in the next ten years, think about how complex

0:30:48.720 --> 0:30:51.560
<v Speaker 13>an international merger is going to be. Right now that

0:30:51.600 --> 0:30:54.280
<v Speaker 13>we're using AI to produce more products, to produce more

0:30:54.400 --> 0:30:59.320
<v Speaker 13>msas more contracts, etc. We're viewing those Honestly, in ten years,

0:30:59.360 --> 0:31:01.320
<v Speaker 13>I think you can't do it. A human cannot do

0:31:01.440 --> 0:31:04.120
<v Speaker 13>this without aisystems that can integrate with everything else.

0:31:04.200 --> 0:31:06.520
<v Speaker 2>Winston, I want to hold you to this to be succinct.

0:31:06.560 --> 0:31:11.080
<v Speaker 3>This is a tool that makes a practicing lawyer more

0:31:11.120 --> 0:31:13.760
<v Speaker 3>productive and better at their job. Or it is a

0:31:13.800 --> 0:31:17.280
<v Speaker 3>tool that in the future displaces the role will function

0:31:17.360 --> 0:31:20.840
<v Speaker 3>of certainty members within illegal practice.

0:31:21.040 --> 0:31:23.320
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, the best way to think about this is this

0:31:23.360 --> 0:31:25.840
<v Speaker 13>is task automation, and I think it will always be

0:31:25.960 --> 0:31:28.560
<v Speaker 13>task automation. Right, So, if you think about like a

0:31:28.680 --> 0:31:32.880
<v Speaker 13>very complex fund formation that involves fifty LPs or something

0:31:33.000 --> 0:31:36.280
<v Speaker 13>like that, there are certain tasks like doing comment memos

0:31:36.400 --> 0:31:39.360
<v Speaker 13>or something like that that are going to get automated away.

0:31:39.920 --> 0:31:42.840
<v Speaker 13>But a lot of the high value is that strategic

0:31:42.840 --> 0:31:45.720
<v Speaker 13>advice on top of those tasks, right, And so as

0:31:45.760 --> 0:31:48.600
<v Speaker 13>these task get automated, the job of a lawyer is

0:31:48.640 --> 0:31:50.200
<v Speaker 13>just going to level up over time.

0:31:51.440 --> 0:31:55.040
<v Speaker 3>I ask you that because one of the show's biggest fans,

0:31:55.120 --> 0:31:58.200
<v Speaker 3>my father is almost certainly watching, who has more than

0:31:58.240 --> 0:32:01.960
<v Speaker 3>three decades of practice in English and European law, and

0:32:02.000 --> 0:32:05.440
<v Speaker 3>our member as a kid the whole billable hours thing, right,

0:32:05.480 --> 0:32:08.120
<v Speaker 3>You know, lawyers across the world used to scan bar

0:32:08.200 --> 0:32:11.880
<v Speaker 3>codes for fifteen minutes of work. Really interested therefore, for

0:32:11.960 --> 0:32:14.720
<v Speaker 3>how you price this? You know, I think you guys

0:32:14.800 --> 0:32:17.840
<v Speaker 3>run a subscription based model, right, which can also be

0:32:17.880 --> 0:32:21.000
<v Speaker 3>priced depending on the volume of use of any customer.

0:32:21.400 --> 0:32:23.800
<v Speaker 3>But that's the debate, where's the value?

0:32:24.080 --> 0:32:24.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah?

0:32:24.320 --> 0:32:26.760
<v Speaker 13>Exactly so, right now, that is how we do our

0:32:26.760 --> 0:32:29.280
<v Speaker 13>all of our pricing. Over time, what we're starting to

0:32:29.320 --> 0:32:31.080
<v Speaker 13>do a lot more of is how do you do

0:32:31.240 --> 0:32:34.200
<v Speaker 13>custom build for a lot of different customers? And the

0:32:34.280 --> 0:32:37.840
<v Speaker 13>reality is doing these custom builds, these forward deployees solutions

0:32:38.400 --> 0:32:41.160
<v Speaker 13>is with how good the coding models are getting a

0:32:41.200 --> 0:32:44.080
<v Speaker 13>lot lot stronger gross margins, right, And so a lot

0:32:44.080 --> 0:32:45.719
<v Speaker 13>of what we're starting to do is we'll work with

0:32:45.760 --> 0:32:48.640
<v Speaker 13>like a large bank or private equity or telco and

0:32:48.720 --> 0:32:51.320
<v Speaker 13>a law firm that's partnered with them, and we'll actually

0:32:51.360 --> 0:32:55.680
<v Speaker 13>redesign or transform how they deliver those services entirely right,

0:32:56.040 --> 0:32:58.840
<v Speaker 13>and that we are going to price much differently and

0:32:58.880 --> 0:33:01.360
<v Speaker 13>probably closer to do the outcomes work? And how does

0:33:01.360 --> 0:33:03.200
<v Speaker 13>consumption on top of that work.

0:33:03.560 --> 0:33:07.560
<v Speaker 4>You've got some heavyweight investors to quire, kPa, sixt, ZGV, the.

0:33:07.640 --> 0:33:08.320
<v Speaker 8>List goes on.

0:33:08.840 --> 0:33:11.440
<v Speaker 4>They want to hear about how you're able to monetize this.

0:33:12.120 --> 0:33:15.480
<v Speaker 4>When someone is sat within the innovation part of the

0:33:15.560 --> 0:33:18.120
<v Speaker 4>legal business and I do I do a claud plug in,

0:33:18.600 --> 0:33:19.480
<v Speaker 4>Do I do Harvey?

0:33:19.720 --> 0:33:21.840
<v Speaker 8>Do I keep with Lexus and Nexus? What's your answer?

0:33:22.080 --> 0:33:22.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah?

0:33:22.480 --> 0:33:24.880
<v Speaker 13>The best way I think about this is everything else

0:33:24.880 --> 0:33:27.120
<v Speaker 13>out there is a points solution, and what we're building

0:33:27.200 --> 0:33:30.280
<v Speaker 13>is a platform, right, And with that platform you have

0:33:30.400 --> 0:33:34.360
<v Speaker 13>all of the integrations, you have security, you respect, ethical walls, permissions,

0:33:34.640 --> 0:33:37.200
<v Speaker 13>We grab the correct data, so we ground it in

0:33:37.280 --> 0:33:40.120
<v Speaker 13>truthful data into instead of bad data that is going

0:33:40.160 --> 0:33:42.920
<v Speaker 13>to give you a bad answer. And as this scales

0:33:42.920 --> 0:33:45.840
<v Speaker 13>over time, you really just have to outrun these model

0:33:45.840 --> 0:33:48.240
<v Speaker 13>providers that are trying to build the general system right

0:33:48.520 --> 0:33:50.760
<v Speaker 13>and the best that I have and I'm very confident

0:33:51.000 --> 0:33:53.680
<v Speaker 13>in my team's ability to deliver on this is we

0:33:53.720 --> 0:33:57.120
<v Speaker 13>can raise faster in the legal vertical than they can generally.

0:33:58.520 --> 0:34:01.000
<v Speaker 3>Wins In Weinberg, CEO of BE really good to have

0:34:01.080 --> 0:34:02.040
<v Speaker 3>you here on Bloomberg Tech.

0:34:02.040 --> 0:34:02.800
<v Speaker 2>Thank you very much.

0:34:02.880 --> 0:34:04.640
<v Speaker 3>Now, coming up on the program, we're going to discuss

0:34:04.920 --> 0:34:08.840
<v Speaker 3>the top generative AI apps for consumers and Resa Horowitz

0:34:08.840 --> 0:34:11.200
<v Speaker 3>partner Olivia Moore joins us for that conversation.

0:34:11.960 --> 0:34:13.879
<v Speaker 2>A's next, This is Bloomberg Tech.

0:34:23.200 --> 0:34:26.120
<v Speaker 3>Enscale has raised two billion dollars in new funding. The

0:34:26.160 --> 0:34:29.759
<v Speaker 3>deal values the UK based AI data center developer at

0:34:29.840 --> 0:34:33.520
<v Speaker 3>fourteen point six billion dollars and places it amongst Europe's

0:34:33.560 --> 0:34:36.960
<v Speaker 3>most valuable startups. Nscale has also named a trio of

0:34:37.080 --> 0:34:40.200
<v Speaker 3>high profile tech leaders to its board of directors, including

0:34:40.440 --> 0:34:43.840
<v Speaker 3>shel Samdberg, Nick Clegg, and Suzanne Decca Carot.

0:34:44.239 --> 0:34:44.839
<v Speaker 8>Fascinating.

0:34:44.880 --> 0:34:47.320
<v Speaker 4>Now, let's just think about how for a few years

0:34:48.080 --> 0:34:51.200
<v Speaker 4>our AI native firms had the edge with consumers for

0:34:51.280 --> 0:34:52.280
<v Speaker 4>generative AI apps.

0:34:52.280 --> 0:34:54.720
<v Speaker 8>As the market matures, that's kind of fading.

0:34:54.800 --> 0:34:57.080
<v Speaker 4>It's one of the findings and report released today by

0:34:57.120 --> 0:35:00.479
<v Speaker 4>Andrews and Horowitz on the top generitor AIAI. I asked

0:35:00.560 --> 0:35:03.000
<v Speaker 4>a sixteen Z partner Olivia Moore has been doing this

0:35:03.040 --> 0:35:06.520
<v Speaker 4>for three years and what's so interesting is number one

0:35:06.680 --> 0:35:07.600
<v Speaker 4>is still CHATCHYPT.

0:35:07.920 --> 0:35:11.080
<v Speaker 8>We have Gemini, but where are we starting.

0:35:10.760 --> 0:35:12.520
<v Speaker 4>To see just if we're thinking about the consumer and

0:35:12.560 --> 0:35:15.520
<v Speaker 4>consumer focused, that's Claude coming in and how are we

0:35:15.560 --> 0:35:17.200
<v Speaker 4>seeing people using different chapels.

0:35:17.280 --> 0:35:19.560
<v Speaker 14>Yeah, absolutely, there were a lot of This was actually

0:35:19.600 --> 0:35:21.800
<v Speaker 14>the most fun and exciting report to do out of

0:35:21.800 --> 0:35:22.640
<v Speaker 14>the six we've done.

0:35:22.480 --> 0:35:23.720
<v Speaker 7>Because there were a lot of changes.

0:35:24.040 --> 0:35:26.280
<v Speaker 14>First, as you mentioned, we did add for the first

0:35:26.280 --> 0:35:30.080
<v Speaker 14>time companies that are not AI native but are significantly

0:35:30.120 --> 0:35:33.360
<v Speaker 14>AI in hand so Notion as an example, they reported

0:35:33.400 --> 0:35:36.600
<v Speaker 14>that fifty percent of their arr is now coming from

0:35:36.680 --> 0:35:41.400
<v Speaker 14>AI features Canvas another one free pick Grammarly. Then beyond that,

0:35:41.520 --> 0:35:44.000
<v Speaker 14>I think the other really interesting trend in this edition

0:35:44.080 --> 0:35:49.520
<v Speaker 14>of the list is just the continued battle between Chad Chat, GBT, Claude,

0:35:49.520 --> 0:35:52.440
<v Speaker 14>and Gemini for the mainstream consumer, and we've seen some

0:35:52.480 --> 0:35:54.880
<v Speaker 14>pretty significant changes there over the last couple months.

0:35:55.760 --> 0:35:59.400
<v Speaker 4>What sparks the change other than press and coverage of

0:35:59.400 --> 0:36:02.160
<v Speaker 4>what's happening with the Pentagon is that a model comes

0:36:02.200 --> 0:36:04.000
<v Speaker 4>out and eclips is it people are actually using these

0:36:04.040 --> 0:36:04.319
<v Speaker 4>things that.

0:36:04.440 --> 0:36:05.919
<v Speaker 8>Working out which one is better than the other.

0:36:06.320 --> 0:36:08.960
<v Speaker 14>Yeah, it's a great question. So for a while we

0:36:09.000 --> 0:36:13.160
<v Speaker 14>saw consumers were using one generative AI product, if fat

0:36:13.360 --> 0:36:16.960
<v Speaker 14>even and now they're multi tenanting across products but for

0:36:17.000 --> 0:36:19.799
<v Speaker 14>different use cases. So Gemini, if you look at their

0:36:19.880 --> 0:36:23.239
<v Speaker 14>user growth, it's basically perfectly correlated to the release of

0:36:23.320 --> 0:36:26.720
<v Speaker 14>like Nano Banana Vo three, all of these new creative models.

0:36:27.160 --> 0:36:29.400
<v Speaker 14>Where Claud is really starting to shine, I think is

0:36:29.440 --> 0:36:31.799
<v Speaker 14>in the prosumer and work tools. So Claud Code of

0:36:31.800 --> 0:36:34.359
<v Speaker 14>course had a crazy ramp to a billion in arar.

0:36:34.840 --> 0:36:37.560
<v Speaker 14>Claud Cowork is now their product for consumers that's being

0:36:37.600 --> 0:36:38.640
<v Speaker 14>picked up pretty quickly.

0:36:39.000 --> 0:36:40.400
<v Speaker 2>They also put Claud.

0:36:40.239 --> 0:36:43.640
<v Speaker 14>In Excel in Google Sheets. Probably the best way to

0:36:43.719 --> 0:36:47.319
<v Speaker 14>understand this is both Claud and CHATCHYBT now have their

0:36:47.360 --> 0:36:50.520
<v Speaker 14>own app stores. They each have more than two hundred

0:36:50.560 --> 0:36:53.680
<v Speaker 14>apps that they offer access to, but there's only eleven

0:36:53.760 --> 0:36:57.520
<v Speaker 14>percent overlap between them. CHATCHYBT is leaning in on the

0:36:57.520 --> 0:37:03.080
<v Speaker 14>mainstream consumer like fashion, shop, thing, travel, transportation. Sam Altman

0:37:03.120 --> 0:37:06.240
<v Speaker 14>has said he wants CHATCHYBD to be for everyone. Claude

0:37:06.280 --> 0:37:09.239
<v Speaker 14>is leaning in on like deep premium data sets for

0:37:09.360 --> 0:37:12.680
<v Speaker 14>scientific work, medical work, data analysis, and so I think

0:37:12.680 --> 0:37:15.120
<v Speaker 14>we're seeing them go in slightly different directions in terms

0:37:15.120 --> 0:37:16.399
<v Speaker 14>of the audience they're trying to win.

0:37:17.120 --> 0:37:17.359
<v Speaker 2>Team.

0:37:17.440 --> 0:37:19.719
<v Speaker 3>Let's bring back up the top one hundred ranking and

0:37:19.760 --> 0:37:21.759
<v Speaker 3>then focus in on I guess the top five ten.

0:37:21.840 --> 0:37:24.720
<v Speaker 3>I'll find this Olivia is so interesting that deep seek

0:37:24.800 --> 0:37:28.600
<v Speaker 3>is so high up. Maybe through explaining the methodology of

0:37:28.640 --> 0:37:31.399
<v Speaker 3>how you put the ranking together. Like some of these names,

0:37:31.440 --> 0:37:33.000
<v Speaker 3>you kind of touched on it there, but you more

0:37:33.040 --> 0:37:37.440
<v Speaker 3>associate them with enterprise, you'd associate their use outside of

0:37:37.440 --> 0:37:38.920
<v Speaker 3>the United States potentially.

0:37:39.920 --> 0:37:41.120
<v Speaker 2>What are you seeing in the data?

0:37:41.640 --> 0:37:44.120
<v Speaker 14>Yeah, deep seek is a fascinating one because it was

0:37:44.160 --> 0:37:46.360
<v Speaker 14>actually higher on prior versions of the list and has

0:37:46.440 --> 0:37:49.279
<v Speaker 14>dropped down. What basically is happening with deep seek on

0:37:49.320 --> 0:37:52.840
<v Speaker 14>a country by country basis is that China and Russia

0:37:52.880 --> 0:37:55.960
<v Speaker 14>are blocked from using many of the Western AI tools,

0:37:56.280 --> 0:37:58.960
<v Speaker 14>So China is heavily deep seak. It's their number one

0:37:59.000 --> 0:38:01.920
<v Speaker 14>product than something like a dowbou from by Dan, something

0:38:01.960 --> 0:38:04.960
<v Speaker 14>like a Kimmi, and Russia's the number two market for

0:38:05.000 --> 0:38:08.239
<v Speaker 14>deep Seek. It has fallen off a cliff in terms

0:38:08.280 --> 0:38:10.440
<v Speaker 14>of usage in the US. I think it's fair to say,

0:38:10.680 --> 0:38:12.440
<v Speaker 14>and I actually think that goes back to the question

0:38:12.480 --> 0:38:15.520
<v Speaker 14>about what's going to happen with Claude, because what we

0:38:15.560 --> 0:38:18.280
<v Speaker 14>saw with deep Seek in the US was all press

0:38:18.360 --> 0:38:20.440
<v Speaker 14>was good press, even if it was bad press, just

0:38:20.480 --> 0:38:22.759
<v Speaker 14>because people didn't know about the product. And I think

0:38:22.800 --> 0:38:25.640
<v Speaker 14>the same thing happened with Claude in the past week,

0:38:25.719 --> 0:38:29.240
<v Speaker 14>in that a couple months ago, market awareness of Claude

0:38:29.280 --> 0:38:33.480
<v Speaker 14>amongst US consumers was maybe two percent, And so now

0:38:33.600 --> 0:38:36.440
<v Speaker 14>they're topping the app store just because many people have

0:38:36.480 --> 0:38:38.319
<v Speaker 14>never heard of the product and they're downloading it for

0:38:38.360 --> 0:38:40.520
<v Speaker 14>the first time. So it'll be interesting to see if

0:38:40.560 --> 0:38:43.360
<v Speaker 14>they're able to retain those users or if, like deep Seek,

0:38:43.400 --> 0:38:46.000
<v Speaker 14>they will only keep users in countries that can't access

0:38:46.040 --> 0:38:46.760
<v Speaker 14>other products.

0:38:47.719 --> 0:38:50.239
<v Speaker 2>Olivia Moore Andresen Horwitz. Is great to have you back

0:38:50.239 --> 0:38:51.839
<v Speaker 2>on the program. Thank you very much.

0:38:51.840 --> 0:38:53.359
<v Speaker 3>I want to get back to that breaking news from

0:38:53.360 --> 0:38:56.920
<v Speaker 3>earlier in the hour. Anthropic is suing the Defense Department

0:38:56.960 --> 0:38:59.799
<v Speaker 3>after it was labeled a supply chain risk, a designation

0:39:00.080 --> 0:39:04.640
<v Speaker 3>usually reserved for foreign adversaries. Matt Settlemanhelm of Bloomberg Intelligence

0:39:04.719 --> 0:39:08.080
<v Speaker 3>joins us now and Matt appreciate you you're running in.

0:39:08.280 --> 0:39:12.520
<v Speaker 3>It's a breaking new scenario. But from the Bloomberg Intelligence perspective,

0:39:12.560 --> 0:39:16.160
<v Speaker 3>what is the react to this latest development where essentially

0:39:16.520 --> 0:39:19.960
<v Speaker 3>Anthropic is pushing back on the Department of Defense saying

0:39:20.560 --> 0:39:23.040
<v Speaker 3>hold on, we don't want you to look elsewhere, we

0:39:23.080 --> 0:39:25.640
<v Speaker 3>want you to use our tech will explain it.

0:39:26.239 --> 0:39:29.239
<v Speaker 15>Yeah, So this is exactly what we expected after the

0:39:29.239 --> 0:39:32.960
<v Speaker 15>developments from not this most recent Friday, but the friday

0:39:33.000 --> 0:39:35.759
<v Speaker 15>before when the government announced it was taking this action.

0:39:35.880 --> 0:39:41.000
<v Speaker 15>That was a tweet from Pete Hegseth announcing this decision.

0:39:41.360 --> 0:39:43.960
<v Speaker 15>Since then, in the middle of last week, the Defense

0:39:44.000 --> 0:39:48.200
<v Speaker 15>Department sent the company a two page letter informing it

0:39:48.360 --> 0:39:52.359
<v Speaker 15>of this supply chain designation. And now within ours we

0:39:52.400 --> 0:39:56.640
<v Speaker 15>have this lawsuit filed by the company. It pursues what

0:39:56.960 --> 0:39:59.759
<v Speaker 15>we expected was really a claim that this violates the

0:39:59.880 --> 0:40:04.880
<v Speaker 15>r arbitrary and capricious standard under the Administrative Procedures Act,

0:40:05.239 --> 0:40:09.279
<v Speaker 15>which basically says that the government has to use reasoned

0:40:09.480 --> 0:40:13.080
<v Speaker 15>decision making. It can't penalize a company just because it

0:40:13.120 --> 0:40:16.399
<v Speaker 15>wants to. It has to look at the law and ask, hey,

0:40:16.560 --> 0:40:19.959
<v Speaker 15>is Anthropic violating the law? And what we haven't seen

0:40:20.040 --> 0:40:23.160
<v Speaker 15>really from the Defense Department is any connection between this

0:40:23.320 --> 0:40:29.440
<v Speaker 15>supply chain statute and anything that Anthropic itself has done. Instead,

0:40:29.480 --> 0:40:33.279
<v Speaker 15>this has been about a dispute about contract negotiations, an

0:40:33.280 --> 0:40:36.920
<v Speaker 15>agreement that the Defense Department had agreed to in July.

0:40:37.520 --> 0:40:40.880
<v Speaker 15>It wanted to change it. Anthropic resisted all of a

0:40:40.960 --> 0:40:45.120
<v Speaker 15>sudden it was deemed a much larger supply chain risk.

0:40:45.160 --> 0:40:47.680
<v Speaker 15>So I think we're going to see an immediate court

0:40:47.719 --> 0:40:51.160
<v Speaker 15>fight on whether that Defense Department decision should be stayed

0:40:51.760 --> 0:40:54.440
<v Speaker 15>because it doesn't constitute reason decision making.

0:40:55.520 --> 0:41:00.520
<v Speaker 4>They talk about how the actions are unprecedented. So what precedent, Matthew,

0:41:00.600 --> 0:41:04.799
<v Speaker 4>can lawyers legal lees go to in this moment to

0:41:04.880 --> 0:41:07.920
<v Speaker 4>decide who has the uphand in what will be a

0:41:07.920 --> 0:41:10.360
<v Speaker 4>more drawn out conversation to have in front of the courts.

0:41:11.080 --> 0:41:16.040
<v Speaker 15>Yeah, so under this exact statute, it's rarely been litigated

0:41:16.680 --> 0:41:19.440
<v Speaker 15>and it's rarely been used. It only dates back from

0:41:19.480 --> 0:41:22.520
<v Speaker 15>about twenty eighteen. But what lawyers are going to look

0:41:22.560 --> 0:41:28.080
<v Speaker 15>to here is defense decisions under other statutes, and you've

0:41:28.120 --> 0:41:31.640
<v Speaker 15>seen that in some cases where under other supply chain

0:41:31.719 --> 0:41:35.359
<v Speaker 15>risk determinations under these other laws, companies have been able

0:41:35.400 --> 0:41:39.960
<v Speaker 15>to bring lawsuits and say, Okay, this is not reason

0:41:40.040 --> 0:41:40.720
<v Speaker 15>decision making.

0:41:40.760 --> 0:41:42.080
<v Speaker 2>This violates the law.

0:41:42.560 --> 0:41:46.640
<v Speaker 15>It's an arbitrary and capricious exercise of your authority. And

0:41:47.000 --> 0:41:49.400
<v Speaker 15>you know, it's very difficult to beat the Defense Department.

0:41:49.440 --> 0:41:52.120
<v Speaker 15>That's the first thing to know. The court gives them

0:41:52.160 --> 0:41:55.200
<v Speaker 15>great deference on national security, so this isn't easy at

0:41:55.239 --> 0:41:59.279
<v Speaker 15>all paranthropic, but if the Defense Department didn't try to

0:41:59.280 --> 0:42:02.040
<v Speaker 15>connect it to the law, and so far we haven't

0:42:02.040 --> 0:42:05.279
<v Speaker 15>seen much of a record really connecting it to this law.

0:42:05.320 --> 0:42:08.520
<v Speaker 15>We've seen criticism of the company's policies, you know, a

0:42:08.600 --> 0:42:12.160
<v Speaker 15>criticism of it as being a woke company. It's going

0:42:12.200 --> 0:42:14.520
<v Speaker 15>to take more than that to justify this in court,

0:42:14.560 --> 0:42:16.480
<v Speaker 15>and that's going to be the question for a judge.

0:42:16.960 --> 0:42:20.640
<v Speaker 15>Is there a real basis under this supply chain law

0:42:21.040 --> 0:42:24.200
<v Speaker 15>that justifies such an extreme action. The company is going

0:42:24.239 --> 0:42:28.040
<v Speaker 15>to say, this inflicts irreparable harm on us and it's

0:42:28.080 --> 0:42:29.399
<v Speaker 15>not justified under the law.

0:42:29.560 --> 0:42:29.920
<v Speaker 2>Matthew.

0:42:29.920 --> 0:42:32.880
<v Speaker 3>That's why I ask about the idea that Anthropic is

0:42:33.000 --> 0:42:37.439
<v Speaker 3>challenging the Pentagon in deciding to negotiate with open Ai.

0:42:37.560 --> 0:42:40.680
<v Speaker 3>For example, in parallel right, they will say, when this

0:42:40.960 --> 0:42:43.439
<v Speaker 3>supply chain risk label was given just quickly, well okay,

0:42:43.480 --> 0:42:45.239
<v Speaker 3>we'll turn someone else for their technology.

0:42:45.360 --> 0:42:46.319
<v Speaker 2>How does that factor in?

0:42:46.920 --> 0:42:49.600
<v Speaker 15>I think that you know, that raises concerns about the

0:42:49.719 --> 0:42:54.920
<v Speaker 15>arbitrariness of what's going on here, especially if open Ai

0:42:55.480 --> 0:42:58.920
<v Speaker 15>insisted on terms and restrictions that were really not that

0:42:59.200 --> 0:43:03.600
<v Speaker 15>different from what Anthropic took a hard line on. That's

0:43:03.680 --> 0:43:06.760
<v Speaker 15>also going to play into whether this was reason decision

0:43:06.800 --> 0:43:10.040
<v Speaker 15>making or whether this was a desire by the Defense

0:43:10.080 --> 0:43:12.200
<v Speaker 15>Department to make an example of this company.

0:43:12.520 --> 0:43:16.560
<v Speaker 4>Matthew Shetenhaum bloomeg Intelligence, fantastic expertise there.

0:43:16.600 --> 0:43:18.800
<v Speaker 8>We thank you. That does it for this edition of

0:43:18.840 --> 0:43:22.280
<v Speaker 8>Bloomberg Tech Ed once again your legal degree coming out strong.

0:43:22.640 --> 0:43:23.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, a little bit.

0:43:23.760 --> 0:43:27.520
<v Speaker 3>I mean, fascinating coverage are both private markets and public markets,

0:43:27.560 --> 0:43:30.200
<v Speaker 3>and obviously in the markets, the war in Iran continues

0:43:30.239 --> 0:43:33.760
<v Speaker 3>to be a massive factor. Really great conversations worth recapping

0:43:33.760 --> 0:43:34.320
<v Speaker 3>on the podcast.

0:43:34.480 --> 0:43:35.319
<v Speaker 2>No where to find it.

0:43:35.320 --> 0:43:38.200
<v Speaker 3>It's on the Bloomberg terminal, as well as online on Apple,

0:43:38.440 --> 0:43:42.200
<v Speaker 3>Spotify and iHeart It's another big week ahead, and this

0:43:42.239 --> 0:43:43.080
<v Speaker 3>is Bloomberg Tech