WEBVTT - NFL Week 4 Early Picks | Line Movement Predictions (Ep. 526)

0:00:01.120 --> 0:00:03.400
<v Speaker 1>Welcome in, everybody to betting pros. It's time to place

0:00:03.440 --> 0:00:05.920
<v Speaker 1>your bets. So this me Joey p Joe Pi Zapia,

0:00:06.320 --> 0:00:09.319
<v Speaker 1>and this is BP NFL. It's time to look ahead

0:00:09.400 --> 0:00:12.119
<v Speaker 1>at the early value of lines for week four in

0:00:12.160 --> 0:00:14.400
<v Speaker 1>the NFL. And who better to help me out than

0:00:14.440 --> 0:00:18.720
<v Speaker 1>the Undertaker himself Andrew Rickson Ericson. It was a wacky,

0:00:18.800 --> 0:00:22.800
<v Speaker 1>wild week three. It was one where as Sunday dragged on,

0:00:22.880 --> 0:00:24.920
<v Speaker 1>I thought to myself, you know, I'm gonna be very

0:00:24.920 --> 0:00:27.000
<v Speaker 1>careful about week three. This feels like a lot of chalk,

0:00:27.040 --> 0:00:28.800
<v Speaker 1>a lot of weird stuff. I'm gonna back off a

0:00:28.800 --> 0:00:31.160
<v Speaker 1>little bit. And I'm glad I did, because it was

0:00:31.640 --> 0:00:35.360
<v Speaker 1>panic at the disco everywhere. And the one thing that

0:00:35.400 --> 0:00:38.960
<v Speaker 1>I stayed true to was my Minnesota Vikings upset Special

0:00:38.960 --> 0:00:42.320
<v Speaker 1>of the Week. We talked about it on the Thursday show.

0:00:42.840 --> 0:00:45.840
<v Speaker 1>It came through Let's go Vikings. I'm repping the Viking

0:00:45.880 --> 0:00:49.280
<v Speaker 1>stuff today. The Purple people eaters ate the heart of

0:00:49.320 --> 0:00:53.440
<v Speaker 1>the Houston Texans. But a week three Ericson, that's still

0:00:53.440 --> 0:00:55.639
<v Speaker 1>going on. We got two Monday Night games tonight. Some

0:00:55.800 --> 0:00:59.240
<v Speaker 1>crazy stuff there, I mean, big takeaways from you. Some

0:00:59.320 --> 0:01:01.880
<v Speaker 1>of these upsets, like, was Bryce Young really just the

0:01:01.880 --> 0:01:04.040
<v Speaker 1>problem all along for the Carolina Panthers, because.

0:01:03.800 --> 0:01:06.360
<v Speaker 2>It's like it, yes he was. He was the problem.

0:01:06.480 --> 0:01:09.440
<v Speaker 2>And now they're talking about how we're getting trade requests.

0:01:09.440 --> 0:01:11.760
<v Speaker 2>We're not going to trade him. I think his stock

0:01:11.880 --> 0:01:16.960
<v Speaker 2>just went down, right. How how great Andy Dalton was

0:01:17.000 --> 0:01:19.000
<v Speaker 2>able to play. He was the first quarterback this season

0:01:19.000 --> 0:01:20.920
<v Speaker 2>to throw for three hundred yards and three touchdowns. Because

0:01:21.000 --> 0:01:23.600
<v Speaker 2>scoring is not a thing anymore, just if you're just

0:01:23.600 --> 0:01:26.880
<v Speaker 2>tuning in right now, nobody scores points anymore. Underdogs are

0:01:26.880 --> 0:01:28.960
<v Speaker 2>covering at an unreal rate. Underdogs are winning out right

0:01:29.160 --> 0:01:31.399
<v Speaker 2>under an unreal rate. It's more fun to better than

0:01:31.440 --> 0:01:33.720
<v Speaker 2>underdog because nobody's scoring, so the games are always close

0:01:34.040 --> 0:01:35.880
<v Speaker 2>and you always got a shot. So that's how I've

0:01:35.920 --> 0:01:37.880
<v Speaker 2>kind of been absorbment. It was more on the underdogs

0:01:37.920 --> 0:01:40.440
<v Speaker 2>this week, and it was more fun because teams aren't

0:01:40.440 --> 0:01:42.560
<v Speaker 2>blowing out other teams, it's not as easy to do it.

0:01:42.640 --> 0:01:45.120
<v Speaker 2>So it was a fun. Week three, really wacky, and

0:01:45.200 --> 0:01:46.520
<v Speaker 2>looking forward to breaking down Week four.

0:01:47.120 --> 0:01:49.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, absolutely, all right, let's get after it, everybody, and

0:01:49.960 --> 0:01:53.200
<v Speaker 1>let's talk about Week four in the NFL. Let's start

0:01:53.240 --> 0:01:55.520
<v Speaker 1>with maybe maybe a short week is a good thing

0:01:55.560 --> 0:01:57.480
<v Speaker 1>for the Dallas Cowboys. You don't have too much time

0:01:57.960 --> 0:02:00.360
<v Speaker 1>to dwell in the past because they are going to

0:02:00.440 --> 0:02:03.040
<v Speaker 1>head to New York to play the New York Football Giants.

0:02:03.040 --> 0:02:06.320
<v Speaker 1>Fresh off they are big upset win themselves against the

0:02:06.320 --> 0:02:08.840
<v Speaker 1>Cleveland Browns. The New York Giants are four and a

0:02:08.880 --> 0:02:12.079
<v Speaker 1>half point underdogs right now, I'm betting pros forty three

0:02:12.160 --> 0:02:14.560
<v Speaker 1>and a half is the number, and you got plus

0:02:14.560 --> 0:02:16.640
<v Speaker 1>one eighty five on the Giants to beat the Cowboys.

0:02:16.840 --> 0:02:18.880
<v Speaker 1>This feels like they get right game here for the

0:02:18.919 --> 0:02:22.440
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys to me. But Andrew, from what you've seen out

0:02:22.440 --> 0:02:24.720
<v Speaker 1>of the Cowboys, is the four and a half too much?

0:02:24.800 --> 0:02:26.120
<v Speaker 1>Not enough? What do you think?

0:02:26.560 --> 0:02:28.640
<v Speaker 2>Well, we know one thing about the Cowboys, and this

0:02:28.680 --> 0:02:30.800
<v Speaker 2>is going against everything I've already said. But they only

0:02:30.800 --> 0:02:33.840
<v Speaker 2>playing blowouts. I mean, if you watch this game last week,

0:02:33.919 --> 0:02:35.880
<v Speaker 2>it was a blot. I know that they were able

0:02:35.919 --> 0:02:37.560
<v Speaker 2>to rally and get some points on the board. That

0:02:37.600 --> 0:02:40.640
<v Speaker 2>game was not competitive. The Ravens were destroying the Dallas Cowboys.

0:02:40.680 --> 0:02:43.200
<v Speaker 2>They got a nonzyde kick, which never happens, especially with

0:02:43.200 --> 0:02:46.079
<v Speaker 2>the new rules, so they got really lucky to kind

0:02:46.080 --> 0:02:47.880
<v Speaker 2>of make that game look a lot closer than it was.

0:02:47.919 --> 0:02:51.000
<v Speaker 2>But every game Dallas plays is a blowout in either direction.

0:02:51.080 --> 0:02:53.160
<v Speaker 2>Either they're getting blown out or they're killing the team

0:02:53.160 --> 0:02:56.280
<v Speaker 2>they're playing. We've seen this. We've seen this story before

0:02:56.720 --> 0:02:59.679
<v Speaker 2>Dallas against the New York Giants, Daniel Jones, the coming

0:02:59.720 --> 0:03:02.720
<v Speaker 2>off of win, they're feeling good short week. I think

0:03:02.760 --> 0:03:05.040
<v Speaker 2>this is where just Dallas just crushes because that's what

0:03:05.080 --> 0:03:07.519
<v Speaker 2>they do. So it's not enough for me. I looked

0:03:07.520 --> 0:03:09.000
<v Speaker 2>at this. I think it's be closer to Dallas by

0:03:09.040 --> 0:03:11.360
<v Speaker 2>a touchdown because I've seen what this team can do

0:03:11.440 --> 0:03:14.519
<v Speaker 2>when they are humming, and it's usually after they play

0:03:14.560 --> 0:03:17.160
<v Speaker 2>really bad they start to hum. So I like the

0:03:17.400 --> 0:03:19.120
<v Speaker 2>under because I think that both offensive lines have a

0:03:19.160 --> 0:03:21.960
<v Speaker 2>lot of issues. You saw the Giants swarming after Deshaun

0:03:21.960 --> 0:03:25.080
<v Speaker 2>Watson in Week three, Dak Prescott was hunder arrest by

0:03:25.080 --> 0:03:27.120
<v Speaker 2>the Ravens. That's the one part of the Giants that

0:03:27.160 --> 0:03:29.640
<v Speaker 2>I do like is their defensive line in their pass rush.

0:03:29.960 --> 0:03:32.440
<v Speaker 2>So again, primetime unders, those have been hitting at a

0:03:32.480 --> 0:03:34.000
<v Speaker 2>high rate. I like the hundred forty three and a

0:03:34.040 --> 0:03:36.080
<v Speaker 2>half and I like the Dallas Cowboys to cover the

0:03:36.120 --> 0:03:37.240
<v Speaker 2>four and a half point spread.

0:03:37.440 --> 0:03:40.080
<v Speaker 1>All right, before we get to the Sunday Games. A

0:03:40.160 --> 0:03:42.520
<v Speaker 1>quick little note here, we've got another giveaway here on

0:03:42.560 --> 0:03:46.400
<v Speaker 1>Betting Pros YouTube channel. Assigned Nick Chubb helmet giveaway is

0:03:46.480 --> 0:03:48.960
<v Speaker 1>still available and if you want a chance to win

0:03:49.000 --> 0:03:51.680
<v Speaker 1>the sign Nick Chubb helmet for free courtesy of our

0:03:51.720 --> 0:03:54.240
<v Speaker 1>friends at Pristine Auction dot com, all you need to

0:03:54.240 --> 0:03:56.320
<v Speaker 1>do is at the Betting Pros dot com slash contest

0:03:56.360 --> 0:03:59.000
<v Speaker 1>and complete the form and either download the Betting Pros

0:03:59.040 --> 0:04:01.560
<v Speaker 1>app leaver of you of the Betting Pros podcast, or

0:04:01.600 --> 0:04:04.480
<v Speaker 1>subscribe to our social media channels at Betting Pros on

0:04:04.720 --> 0:04:07.800
<v Speaker 1>x and TikTok and Betting Pros NFL on Instagram. The

0:04:07.840 --> 0:04:11.160
<v Speaker 1>more actions you complete, the more entries you receive, and

0:04:11.200 --> 0:04:13.240
<v Speaker 1>we'll be announcing the winner right here on the channel,

0:04:13.280 --> 0:04:15.520
<v Speaker 1>so make sure you turn on those notifications so you

0:04:15.560 --> 0:04:17.920
<v Speaker 1>can be alerted when new episodes are up and when

0:04:17.920 --> 0:04:20.680
<v Speaker 1>you can claim your prize of the Nick Chubb autographed helmet.

0:04:20.920 --> 0:04:23.760
<v Speaker 1>So subscribe to Betting Pros right now on the YouTube

0:04:23.760 --> 0:04:26.280
<v Speaker 1>as well. Drop your comments below and make sure you

0:04:26.400 --> 0:04:28.520
<v Speaker 1>ring that belts that goes ding because maybe that Nick

0:04:28.600 --> 0:04:31.560
<v Speaker 1>Chubb helmet has your name on it. Let's get to

0:04:31.920 --> 0:04:34.440
<v Speaker 1>Sunday's action here at the one o'clock games. Let's kick

0:04:34.480 --> 0:04:37.919
<v Speaker 1>things off with New Orleans and Atlanta. Atlanta tough loss

0:04:37.960 --> 0:04:40.839
<v Speaker 1>for them, got hosed on that call. No way to

0:04:40.839 --> 0:04:44.160
<v Speaker 1>put it. New Orleans finally turned into a pumpkin Way

0:04:44.200 --> 0:04:48.560
<v Speaker 1>to go, Derek Carr. The Atlanta Falcons are now minus

0:04:48.560 --> 0:04:51.200
<v Speaker 1>one and a half favorites at home. Feels about right

0:04:51.240 --> 0:04:53.799
<v Speaker 1>to me. Forty five and a half is the total

0:04:53.839 --> 0:04:55.799
<v Speaker 1>for this game, minus one twenty five on the Falcons.

0:04:55.800 --> 0:04:57.640
<v Speaker 1>On the money line. I go to the money line

0:04:57.640 --> 0:04:59.440
<v Speaker 1>on this one. I go to the Falcons. I think

0:04:59.440 --> 0:05:03.520
<v Speaker 1>the Falcons are a work in progress, and I think

0:05:03.560 --> 0:05:06.240
<v Speaker 1>the Falcons are going to continue to push things in

0:05:06.279 --> 0:05:09.680
<v Speaker 1>the right direction. That's my feeling, that's my takeaway. New

0:05:09.760 --> 0:05:13.400
<v Speaker 1>Orleans very disappointing against the Eagles, a situation where the

0:05:13.440 --> 0:05:16.880
<v Speaker 1>Eagles ericson were not at full strike out AJ Brown

0:05:16.880 --> 0:05:18.960
<v Speaker 1>and then DeVante Smith comes out of that game and

0:05:19.000 --> 0:05:22.720
<v Speaker 1>frankly kind of disappointing. So I'm on team Atlanta here.

0:05:22.800 --> 0:05:25.520
<v Speaker 1>Where are you when it comes to Falcons and Saints?

0:05:26.160 --> 0:05:28.600
<v Speaker 2>I actually like the Saints here to bounce back. We

0:05:28.680 --> 0:05:31.160
<v Speaker 2>look at what happened in this past game. Rashichiheed had

0:05:31.160 --> 0:05:32.680
<v Speaker 2>a couple of big plays that just didn't end up

0:05:32.760 --> 0:05:35.200
<v Speaker 2>panning out. You know, the first two weeks of the season,

0:05:35.240 --> 0:05:37.279
<v Speaker 2>he was on fire. He was making all those big

0:05:37.279 --> 0:05:39.880
<v Speaker 2>plays downfield. In this game he has over five on

0:05:39.920 --> 0:05:42.400
<v Speaker 2>his five targets, so he didn't see those big passing

0:05:42.400 --> 0:05:45.719
<v Speaker 2>plays downfield. And the Saints lost their starting center right

0:05:45.760 --> 0:05:47.839
<v Speaker 2>at the beginning of the game, so that throws everything

0:05:47.839 --> 0:05:50.040
<v Speaker 2>out of whack. An offensive line that we had concerns

0:05:50.040 --> 0:05:51.720
<v Speaker 2>about entering the year didn't show up in the first

0:05:51.720 --> 0:05:54.359
<v Speaker 2>two weeks. But when you lose your starting center in

0:05:54.400 --> 0:05:56.520
<v Speaker 2>the beginning of the game, that kind of throws everything

0:05:56.560 --> 0:05:58.960
<v Speaker 2>into whack. So I think that kind of caught the

0:05:59.000 --> 0:06:01.440
<v Speaker 2>Saints off guard, trying to adjust on a fly with

0:06:01.520 --> 0:06:04.120
<v Speaker 2>a week of preparation, knowing they don't have Eric McCoy

0:06:04.560 --> 0:06:07.039
<v Speaker 2>or I'm not sure what his his injury is long term,

0:06:07.080 --> 0:06:09.360
<v Speaker 2>but that's kind of I think they'll be more prepared.

0:06:09.400 --> 0:06:11.560
<v Speaker 2>I mean, you look at what's the Falcon's biggest weakness

0:06:11.760 --> 0:06:14.040
<v Speaker 2>Still to this day, they still don't have a pass rush.

0:06:14.279 --> 0:06:16.640
<v Speaker 2>It's non existent. They can't rush the passer. The only

0:06:16.640 --> 0:06:19.040
<v Speaker 2>team that has a worse pressure rate than the Falcons

0:06:19.080 --> 0:06:22.160
<v Speaker 2>this year through three games is the Carolina Panthers. So again,

0:06:22.200 --> 0:06:23.919
<v Speaker 2>Derek car why was he so good the first two weeks?

0:06:24.279 --> 0:06:24.839
<v Speaker 1>No pressure?

0:06:25.160 --> 0:06:27.159
<v Speaker 2>They were not getting pressure on him. So I think

0:06:27.320 --> 0:06:29.680
<v Speaker 2>if they're able to prepare without McCoy, I think that

0:06:29.880 --> 0:06:31.400
<v Speaker 2>we can get back to what we're seeing from that

0:06:31.480 --> 0:06:33.039
<v Speaker 2>offense the first two weeks of the season and not

0:06:33.080 --> 0:06:35.200
<v Speaker 2>what we saw last week. So I like the Saints here.

0:06:35.160 --> 0:06:38.159
<v Speaker 1>You're hanging out with Welsh too much. You know, things

0:06:38.200 --> 0:06:41.800
<v Speaker 1>get thrown out of Weck, not into Weck's way. Too

0:06:41.839 --> 0:06:43.280
<v Speaker 1>much time with the Welsh you're spending.

0:06:43.640 --> 0:06:45.599
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I'm only half the shelves within this year.

0:06:45.880 --> 0:06:47.640
<v Speaker 1>I know, That's what I'm saying, and it's shows. So

0:06:47.640 --> 0:06:49.080
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna have to sit down and have a meeting

0:06:49.080 --> 0:06:51.360
<v Speaker 1>about that later this week. Let's get to the Steelers

0:06:51.360 --> 0:06:54.159
<v Speaker 1>and Colts. This one's in Indianapolis. The Steelers are one

0:06:54.200 --> 0:06:56.520
<v Speaker 1>and a half point favorites on the road. Thirty eight

0:06:56.560 --> 0:06:58.920
<v Speaker 1>and a half is the number whenever you see the Steelers.

0:06:58.920 --> 0:07:01.240
<v Speaker 1>It's gonna have a three to begin the over under

0:07:01.320 --> 0:07:04.640
<v Speaker 1>most days minus one twenty two on the money line

0:07:04.640 --> 0:07:06.640
<v Speaker 1>for the Pittsburgh Steelers plus one h two for the

0:07:06.680 --> 0:07:09.760
<v Speaker 1>Indianapolis Colts. I gotta tell you here, like the discipline

0:07:09.800 --> 0:07:11.680
<v Speaker 1>of the Steelers. This is what they do. They drag

0:07:11.720 --> 0:07:15.160
<v Speaker 1>you down to their level. They boring it up. Fields

0:07:15.240 --> 0:07:17.800
<v Speaker 1>is three to zero. I'm taking Pittsburgh year with the

0:07:17.800 --> 0:07:19.360
<v Speaker 1>one and a half. I think they're gonna go on

0:07:19.400 --> 0:07:21.560
<v Speaker 1>the road, They're gonna play defense, they're gonna be boring,

0:07:21.560 --> 0:07:24.480
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna control the football, and unfortunately, it's gonna be

0:07:24.480 --> 0:07:25.800
<v Speaker 1>a rough start to the year for the Colts, a

0:07:25.800 --> 0:07:28.200
<v Speaker 1>team that I had high aspirations for, but they just

0:07:28.240 --> 0:07:30.320
<v Speaker 1>don't look like they're in sync quite yet and I

0:07:30.400 --> 0:07:32.160
<v Speaker 1>just don't know about that defense. That's gonna be a

0:07:32.160 --> 0:07:34.360
<v Speaker 1>tough day for me. And I feel like every w

0:07:34.680 --> 0:07:36.800
<v Speaker 1>the Pittsburgh Steelers get a little stronger. Eric soon, what

0:07:36.840 --> 0:07:37.920
<v Speaker 1>are your thoughts on this one?

0:07:38.320 --> 0:07:39.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I love the Steelers in the spot. I don't

0:07:39.760 --> 0:07:43.200
<v Speaker 2>really care that it's on the road. What's the big difference?

0:07:43.240 --> 0:07:44.320
<v Speaker 2>And now I know the Steelers are dealing with a

0:07:44.320 --> 0:07:46.200
<v Speaker 2>couple of injuries on their opensive line, so that is

0:07:46.280 --> 0:07:47.440
<v Speaker 2>a little bit concerning, But it.

0:07:47.440 --> 0:07:49.440
<v Speaker 1>Would be more concerning if India had a defense that I.

0:07:49.360 --> 0:07:51.280
<v Speaker 2>Can Yeah, if the Colts had a defensive line that

0:07:51.320 --> 0:07:53.080
<v Speaker 2>could stop the run. Yeah, they stopped the run against

0:07:53.080 --> 0:07:55.600
<v Speaker 2>the Bears, who they just can't run the football, so

0:07:55.760 --> 0:07:57.760
<v Speaker 2>it doesn't really matter. So I think that this is

0:07:57.760 --> 0:08:00.480
<v Speaker 2>the perfect spot for Arthur Smith in this offense to

0:08:00.880 --> 0:08:03.920
<v Speaker 2>hum and you look at what's the pressure point. The

0:08:03.960 --> 0:08:06.720
<v Speaker 2>thing with the Colts that's their biggest problems, specially offensively,

0:08:06.760 --> 0:08:09.200
<v Speaker 2>is they can't They're not running enough plays right. That's

0:08:09.200 --> 0:08:11.240
<v Speaker 2>why they're all suffering in fans. That's why you're not

0:08:11.240 --> 0:08:13.960
<v Speaker 2>seeing any type of fireworks because Anthey Richardson can't get

0:08:13.960 --> 0:08:16.200
<v Speaker 2>any type of rhythm. So that's why he's so inaccurate

0:08:16.200 --> 0:08:18.120
<v Speaker 2>because he's not developing any type of rapport with his

0:08:18.120 --> 0:08:20.880
<v Speaker 2>receivers because they never have the ball because the defense

0:08:20.920 --> 0:08:22.640
<v Speaker 2>is getting killed by the run and they don't have

0:08:22.680 --> 0:08:24.880
<v Speaker 2>the they don't have any time of possession. So it's

0:08:24.920 --> 0:08:27.160
<v Speaker 2>really probably one of the worst draws when you're looking

0:08:27.200 --> 0:08:29.240
<v Speaker 2>at the Colts and their offense and they're just team

0:08:29.280 --> 0:08:31.720
<v Speaker 2>in general, to draw the Steelers on a three game

0:08:31.760 --> 0:08:34.440
<v Speaker 2>winning streak even I mean, it doesn't matter what this

0:08:34.440 --> 0:08:36.920
<v Speaker 2>game is being played. I think I agree it's minus

0:08:36.920 --> 0:08:38.040
<v Speaker 2>one and a half is not enough.

0:08:38.280 --> 0:08:40.360
<v Speaker 1>I gotta tell you, dude, I feel like this one

0:08:40.400 --> 0:08:43.400
<v Speaker 1>is going to be two and a half by the

0:08:43.400 --> 0:08:46.280
<v Speaker 1>time we get to Sunday. Like I think this one's

0:08:46.320 --> 0:08:48.640
<v Speaker 1>gonna move, I would be getting it. This is my

0:08:48.640 --> 0:08:51.240
<v Speaker 1>favorite early line. I want to jump on Pittsburgh right

0:08:51.240 --> 0:08:53.400
<v Speaker 1>now because I think there's more people have time to

0:08:53.520 --> 0:08:56.679
<v Speaker 1>marinate on it. They're gonna feel more confident with the Steelers,

0:08:57.320 --> 0:08:59.200
<v Speaker 1>and I think this is going to change a little bit.

0:08:59.320 --> 0:09:03.200
<v Speaker 1>Value is going to be gone. Minnesota undefeated three and

0:09:03.280 --> 0:09:05.959
<v Speaker 1>oh going against the Green Bay Packers. This one's in

0:09:06.000 --> 0:09:10.199
<v Speaker 1>Green Bay. Malik willis Eater of worlds. Milik willis two

0:09:10.280 --> 0:09:12.480
<v Speaker 1>and oh, what a time to be alive. Malik willis

0:09:12.480 --> 0:09:17.079
<v Speaker 1>Sam Darnald, you know, just your normal NFO quarterbacks getting

0:09:17.080 --> 0:09:20.360
<v Speaker 1>the job done here, Andy Dalton. I mean, what a

0:09:20.400 --> 0:09:23.760
<v Speaker 1>crazy week it was. But maybe we get Jordan Love

0:09:23.800 --> 0:09:26.000
<v Speaker 1>back for this one. That's going to impact this line.

0:09:26.120 --> 0:09:27.840
<v Speaker 1>Minus two and a half. Green Bay is the favorite

0:09:27.920 --> 0:09:31.200
<v Speaker 1>right now makes sense understandably so, especially with that potential looming.

0:09:31.400 --> 0:09:33.640
<v Speaker 1>Forty four and a half is the total. Plus one

0:09:33.800 --> 0:09:38.480
<v Speaker 1>sixteen on Minnesota now anything Andrew For me, the over

0:09:38.679 --> 0:09:40.360
<v Speaker 1>is where I'm leaning a little bit here on this

0:09:40.400 --> 0:09:43.560
<v Speaker 1>one because I do think if Love was practicing last week,

0:09:43.920 --> 0:09:45.640
<v Speaker 1>it might stand a reason that he's gonna give it

0:09:45.640 --> 0:09:47.320
<v Speaker 1>a go this week, and if so, that elevates this

0:09:47.400 --> 0:09:50.800
<v Speaker 1>offense tremendously, even if he's limited. So I do think

0:09:50.960 --> 0:09:52.760
<v Speaker 1>this is going to change the dynamic quite a bit

0:09:52.760 --> 0:09:55.240
<v Speaker 1>of the green Bay Packers. Hopefully the MRI for Donald

0:09:55.240 --> 0:09:58.200
<v Speaker 1>comes back clean. It seems like it's just precautionary. More

0:09:58.240 --> 0:10:00.000
<v Speaker 1>on that to come. But what's your take on missus

0:10:00.040 --> 0:10:01.800
<v Speaker 1>so to green Bay? Any early value for you?

0:10:02.200 --> 0:10:04.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think it really depends on what side you're

0:10:04.200 --> 0:10:06.320
<v Speaker 2>trying to lean on. You know, if you like green Bay,

0:10:06.360 --> 0:10:08.040
<v Speaker 2>you want to back them at home, you should take

0:10:08.080 --> 0:10:09.959
<v Speaker 2>it now. Before they announced, oh well, Jordan Love is

0:10:10.000 --> 0:10:11.920
<v Speaker 2>going to start this game, and we're probably not going

0:10:12.000 --> 0:10:13.880
<v Speaker 2>to know about that because we've seen, you know, Lafloor

0:10:13.920 --> 0:10:17.000
<v Speaker 2>play pretty coy with announcing who he's going to play.

0:10:17.280 --> 0:10:19.640
<v Speaker 2>He's had Jordan Love be questionable leading up to game time.

0:10:19.760 --> 0:10:21.280
<v Speaker 2>So he's probably gonna say, oh, I don't know he's

0:10:21.280 --> 0:10:24.040
<v Speaker 2>gonna play. Maybe he'll play, But if he's practicing in full,

0:10:24.240 --> 0:10:25.920
<v Speaker 2>I think it's gonna be pretty obvious that he's probably

0:10:25.960 --> 0:10:28.520
<v Speaker 2>going to start this game. Now, I do agree Also,

0:10:28.559 --> 0:10:30.120
<v Speaker 2>the value is kind of on the over there because

0:10:30.160 --> 0:10:32.320
<v Speaker 2>it's suppressed because we're not sure if Love is still

0:10:32.320 --> 0:10:34.800
<v Speaker 2>going to play. But at the same time, do I

0:10:34.840 --> 0:10:36.880
<v Speaker 2>really want to take the over against the Vikings defense

0:10:37.040 --> 0:10:39.360
<v Speaker 2>man That Vikings defense is for real, So that's my

0:10:39.400 --> 0:10:42.320
<v Speaker 2>only hesitancy. But I admit that it is pretty low

0:10:42.440 --> 0:10:44.360
<v Speaker 2>depending on, you know, how good we've seen these offices.

0:10:44.400 --> 0:10:46.960
<v Speaker 2>But maybe because Jordan Love is coming back from an injury,

0:10:47.000 --> 0:10:49.680
<v Speaker 2>maybe it's not a smash type of start. So I

0:10:49.679 --> 0:10:51.719
<v Speaker 2>think for me, it's a matter of, hey, wait for

0:10:51.800 --> 0:10:54.640
<v Speaker 2>Jordan Love to be announced, see money coming on the Packers,

0:10:54.679 --> 0:10:56.840
<v Speaker 2>and then take the Vikings, you know, on the road

0:10:56.880 --> 0:10:59.520
<v Speaker 2>as underdogs. So again, it really depends on who you

0:10:59.600 --> 0:11:01.840
<v Speaker 2>like in this game to bet your timing.

0:11:03.559 --> 0:11:07.040
<v Speaker 1>Jacksonville Jaguars will play tonight and we'll see what they do.

0:11:07.200 --> 0:11:09.360
<v Speaker 1>But in the meantime, Houston Texans are two and one.

0:11:09.800 --> 0:11:11.480
<v Speaker 1>They're at home. We don't know the health of Joe

0:11:11.480 --> 0:11:13.960
<v Speaker 1>Mixon or Damian Pierce or what that backfield looks like.

0:11:14.400 --> 0:11:17.280
<v Speaker 1>Going back home is the best medicine here Indivision matchup here.

0:11:17.760 --> 0:11:20.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm worried about Jacksonville starting a year zero to three

0:11:20.679 --> 0:11:22.960
<v Speaker 1>and if so, Man, oh Man, maybe things just start

0:11:23.040 --> 0:11:25.520
<v Speaker 1>kind of falling apart. Texan's coming off a bad loss.

0:11:25.559 --> 0:11:27.680
<v Speaker 1>They're four and a half point favorites at home. Forty

0:11:27.679 --> 0:11:29.520
<v Speaker 1>five and a half is the number you get plus

0:11:29.520 --> 0:11:32.240
<v Speaker 1>one seventy on the Jacksonville Jaguars upset. Now, this is

0:11:32.240 --> 0:11:36.600
<v Speaker 1>one of these dangerous, trappy kind of games for me, Andrew,

0:11:36.679 --> 0:11:39.280
<v Speaker 1>what's your first instinct? Tell you any early value in

0:11:39.320 --> 0:11:40.400
<v Speaker 1>your mind?

0:11:40.520 --> 0:11:42.520
<v Speaker 2>I don't like the value on Houston right now because

0:11:42.840 --> 0:11:44.200
<v Speaker 2>I do think that we see a little bit more

0:11:44.240 --> 0:11:46.199
<v Speaker 2>from Jacksonville when you look at what they've done the

0:11:46.280 --> 0:11:48.400
<v Speaker 2>first two weeks of the season. I think they've kind

0:11:48.440 --> 0:11:50.280
<v Speaker 2>of they've just run really really bad. I mean, they

0:11:50.280 --> 0:11:52.640
<v Speaker 2>should have beat Miami straight up in week one, and

0:11:52.800 --> 0:11:55.240
<v Speaker 2>in week two it was a rainy game. Turnovers kind

0:11:55.280 --> 0:11:56.800
<v Speaker 2>of killed them. They weren't able to degenerate a lot

0:11:56.840 --> 0:11:59.080
<v Speaker 2>of big plays. So I think the Jacksonville Jaguars are

0:11:59.080 --> 0:12:00.800
<v Speaker 2>gonna show out a little bit. It's Buffalo. Maybe they

0:12:00.800 --> 0:12:02.640
<v Speaker 2>don't win, but I think that's going to put more

0:12:02.640 --> 0:12:06.240
<v Speaker 2>money on Jacksonville against Houston coming off a devastating loss.

0:12:06.559 --> 0:12:08.240
<v Speaker 2>And we've talked about Houston how they're just not a

0:12:08.240 --> 0:12:10.760
<v Speaker 2>good team against the spread, they just don't cover spread.

0:12:10.840 --> 0:12:13.200
<v Speaker 2>So again with the number four and a half, kind

0:12:13.200 --> 0:12:15.320
<v Speaker 2>of that in between a field goal on a touchdown.

0:12:15.920 --> 0:12:17.520
<v Speaker 2>I like the value in Jackson because I think this

0:12:17.520 --> 0:12:19.200
<v Speaker 2>line's going to move far into their favor after we

0:12:19.240 --> 0:12:20.520
<v Speaker 2>watch them plan Monday.

0:12:20.720 --> 0:12:23.600
<v Speaker 1>The Rams spilled a rabbit out of their hat. They're

0:12:23.600 --> 0:12:26.320
<v Speaker 1>taking on the Chicago Bears this week. The Bears are

0:12:26.320 --> 0:12:28.840
<v Speaker 1>one and a half point favorites. The total for this

0:12:28.880 --> 0:12:31.079
<v Speaker 1>game is forty and a half. You got even money

0:12:31.080 --> 0:12:34.800
<v Speaker 1>on the Rams to win this game, minus one twenty

0:12:34.840 --> 0:12:37.480
<v Speaker 1>on the Bears. I mean, look, it's practically a pick them.

0:12:38.000 --> 0:12:40.680
<v Speaker 1>I understand why. I think it's just chaotic, right, There's

0:12:40.679 --> 0:12:43.719
<v Speaker 1>so many deficits here with the Rams, but yet they

0:12:43.760 --> 0:12:47.080
<v Speaker 1>just came off this huge upset victory. The Bears have

0:12:47.120 --> 0:12:49.960
<v Speaker 1>been kind of maligned a little bit, and they certainly

0:12:50.320 --> 0:12:53.240
<v Speaker 1>showed a little bit more yesterday. So where are you

0:12:53.280 --> 0:12:55.280
<v Speaker 1>at when it comes to the Rams and Bears? This one?

0:12:55.760 --> 0:12:59.120
<v Speaker 1>My first instinct is just give me the Rams even money,

0:12:59.120 --> 0:13:01.600
<v Speaker 1>give me the better coach, better quarterback, and more often

0:13:01.640 --> 0:13:02.160
<v Speaker 1>than not, that's a.

0:13:02.120 --> 0:13:05.360
<v Speaker 2>Better investment on the Rams. This was one of my

0:13:05.360 --> 0:13:07.160
<v Speaker 2>favorite when I was looking at the early lines. I'm

0:13:07.200 --> 0:13:09.240
<v Speaker 2>like Kimmi Rams, I was able to see Rams plus

0:13:09.240 --> 0:13:11.480
<v Speaker 2>two and a half Rams plus one and a half.

0:13:11.920 --> 0:13:14.319
<v Speaker 2>I don't care if they're playing in Soldier field. This

0:13:14.360 --> 0:13:18.000
<v Speaker 2>is Sean McVay knows Shane Waldron okay, like he's underneath

0:13:18.040 --> 0:13:21.439
<v Speaker 2>that tree. And unfortunately this this root is not sprouting.

0:13:21.960 --> 0:13:24.440
<v Speaker 2>Unfortunately in Chicago, we do not like what we're seeing

0:13:24.440 --> 0:13:28.240
<v Speaker 2>from Shane Waldron. This offense is a mess for they.

0:13:28.160 --> 0:13:30.640
<v Speaker 1>Just realize he still has cole kmet Yes.

0:13:30.800 --> 0:13:34.320
<v Speaker 2>It's it's not good. So again, we've seen this before

0:13:34.440 --> 0:13:37.160
<v Speaker 2>where head coaches don't get fired, office of coordinators get

0:13:37.160 --> 0:13:39.880
<v Speaker 2>fired if things don't start to change. So I don't

0:13:39.960 --> 0:13:42.560
<v Speaker 2>I think Waldron's days may be numbered with Caleb Williams

0:13:43.160 --> 0:13:45.520
<v Speaker 2>in this current. Again, he has upside, we can all

0:13:45.559 --> 0:13:47.000
<v Speaker 2>see it. We can see the big plays, but we're

0:13:47.000 --> 0:13:50.560
<v Speaker 2>also seeing just this chaos around him, and I don't

0:13:50.559 --> 0:13:52.199
<v Speaker 2>think that gets solved. I guess I know the Rams

0:13:52.200 --> 0:13:55.600
<v Speaker 2>defense is horrible, but I mean, Matthew keep betting him

0:13:55.600 --> 0:13:57.720
<v Speaker 2>outstthew Stafford mat give me Matthe Staffers is a underdog.

0:13:57.880 --> 0:14:00.760
<v Speaker 2>He's so gutsy, gonna make every throw go take every hit.

0:14:01.080 --> 0:14:03.600
<v Speaker 2>Give me that guy as an underdog every single time.

0:14:03.720 --> 0:14:05.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, you just can't let down too. You can't have

0:14:05.360 --> 0:14:07.320
<v Speaker 1>a win like that against the forty nine ers and

0:14:07.320 --> 0:14:09.120
<v Speaker 1>then go to Chicago and Lance heard like, you just

0:14:09.160 --> 0:14:11.320
<v Speaker 1>can't do that. I don't think. I think show mcma

0:14:11.559 --> 0:14:12.440
<v Speaker 1>to Discovery understand that.

0:14:12.520 --> 0:14:12.679
<v Speaker 2>Good.

0:14:12.720 --> 0:14:15.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's what I mean. That's why again, when you're

0:14:15.040 --> 0:14:16.679
<v Speaker 1>looking at these games where you're like, Okay, it's basically

0:14:16.720 --> 0:14:19.560
<v Speaker 1>a picker and I go coach quarterback. Oh, they're both

0:14:19.640 --> 0:14:22.720
<v Speaker 1>on one side. Okay, give me that side. So I'm

0:14:22.760 --> 0:14:25.240
<v Speaker 1>with you one hundred percent. By the way, I'm looking

0:14:25.280 --> 0:14:28.240
<v Speaker 1>at the Betting pros app right now as we're doing

0:14:28.360 --> 0:14:31.320
<v Speaker 1>the show, and I'm looking seven to one in week

0:14:31.360 --> 0:14:34.680
<v Speaker 1>three and the chaos of week three see little Discipline's good.

0:14:35.040 --> 0:14:38.520
<v Speaker 1>I didn't go too crazy. I kept my composure. Some

0:14:38.560 --> 0:14:40.160
<v Speaker 1>crazy stuff on the board, and I was like, you

0:14:40.160 --> 0:14:42.520
<v Speaker 1>know what, I'm just not going to go two nuts

0:14:42.560 --> 0:14:44.840
<v Speaker 1>this week. And that's what I love about the Betting

0:14:44.840 --> 0:14:46.800
<v Speaker 1>pros app is I can track all my progress see

0:14:46.840 --> 0:14:49.280
<v Speaker 1>what's going on there at all times. And again, if

0:14:49.320 --> 0:14:52.240
<v Speaker 1>you haven't already, you should be downloading the Betting pros app.

0:14:52.280 --> 0:14:54.800
<v Speaker 1>You should be tracking your own bets. You should be

0:14:55.200 --> 0:14:57.960
<v Speaker 1>using the tools the way Andrew and I are to

0:14:58.080 --> 0:15:00.840
<v Speaker 1>make the best decisions we possibly can. And if you

0:15:00.880 --> 0:15:04.720
<v Speaker 1>haven't already, download the Betting Pros app on iOS on Android,

0:15:05.400 --> 0:15:07.800
<v Speaker 1>sink your sports books for free. You can track all

0:15:07.880 --> 0:15:10.840
<v Speaker 1>your bets, doesn't matter it's football, basketball, baseball, forget it.

0:15:10.840 --> 0:15:12.640
<v Speaker 1>You could track all of it. And you can track

0:15:12.680 --> 0:15:14.600
<v Speaker 1>all the line movement too as the week goes on,

0:15:14.720 --> 0:15:17.400
<v Speaker 1>and you get custom line alerts from the Betting Pros app,

0:15:17.440 --> 0:15:19.720
<v Speaker 1>So these games that we're talking about, you'll be able

0:15:19.760 --> 0:15:22.760
<v Speaker 1>to get all those updates as the week goes on.

0:15:22.840 --> 0:15:25.120
<v Speaker 1>Anytime there's movement boom, you can set it. And if

0:15:25.160 --> 0:15:26.920
<v Speaker 1>you're waiting for something to happen and it happens, you

0:15:26.960 --> 0:15:30.200
<v Speaker 1>can jump on it and be early. So again, download

0:15:30.200 --> 0:15:32.280
<v Speaker 1>the app, follow us at betting pros dot com, slash

0:15:32.360 --> 0:15:34.880
<v Speaker 1>ericson slash Joe, so that way you can tail us

0:15:34.920 --> 0:15:36.880
<v Speaker 1>too and make sure you're doing the best you can

0:15:36.960 --> 0:15:39.320
<v Speaker 1>to make yourself the most profitable better you possibly can be.

0:15:39.520 --> 0:15:42.760
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's get to the next one. Here on

0:15:42.800 --> 0:15:45.600
<v Speaker 1>our list of games for week four, we just took

0:15:45.640 --> 0:15:49.440
<v Speaker 1>care of Chicago, La. Let's talk about Tampa Bay and Philadelphia.

0:15:50.080 --> 0:15:53.840
<v Speaker 1>So Philly's running out of wide receivers. Tampa Bay, what

0:15:54.400 --> 0:15:57.880
<v Speaker 1>a disaster. You're at home and the Denver Broncos beat

0:15:57.920 --> 0:15:59.640
<v Speaker 1>up on you. This one really just straight up pissed

0:15:59.640 --> 0:16:03.040
<v Speaker 1>me off. You pissed me off, hated it, very upset

0:16:03.080 --> 0:16:06.880
<v Speaker 1>about it. The Philadelphia Eagles minus two and a half favorites.

0:16:07.960 --> 0:16:10.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. This feels fishy to me. Ericson on

0:16:10.240 --> 0:16:12.680
<v Speaker 1>the road without aj Brown, with aut Davonta Smith, They're

0:16:12.680 --> 0:16:15.520
<v Speaker 1>not gonna have either room for this game. Forty six

0:16:15.520 --> 0:16:18.160
<v Speaker 1>and a half is the number. Plus one sixteen for Tampa.

0:16:18.760 --> 0:16:21.200
<v Speaker 1>I might just go right to plus one sixteen for Tampa.

0:16:21.280 --> 0:16:22.880
<v Speaker 1>That's where my eye goes. Where does yours go?

0:16:23.800 --> 0:16:25.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I'm not sure exactly why we have so much

0:16:25.600 --> 0:16:28.000
<v Speaker 2>faith that the Eagles should be favored in that game.

0:16:28.080 --> 0:16:31.600
<v Speaker 2>That's kind of my first inclination looking at this again.

0:16:31.680 --> 0:16:34.120
<v Speaker 2>Tampa Bay. Yes, they laid an egg against Bonix and

0:16:34.200 --> 0:16:36.160
<v Speaker 2>the de But some guys you just play bad gamest.

0:16:36.320 --> 0:16:39.240
<v Speaker 2>Some of that happens. Suffists can be fluky, you know,

0:16:39.240 --> 0:16:41.320
<v Speaker 2>they were. The Buccaneers were feeling themselves after they had

0:16:41.320 --> 0:16:43.600
<v Speaker 2>that big win against the Detroit Lions and then again

0:16:43.760 --> 0:16:46.080
<v Speaker 2>come out against an inferior opponent and then they just

0:16:46.120 --> 0:16:47.920
<v Speaker 2>kind of like lay an egg. So for me, yeah,

0:16:47.960 --> 0:16:50.360
<v Speaker 2>the Eagles are kind of the walking wounded a little

0:16:50.400 --> 0:16:54.440
<v Speaker 2>bit here, and Baker Mayfield again very upset after that game.

0:16:54.560 --> 0:16:56.320
<v Speaker 2>I think he's gonna get the edge back here. You

0:16:56.360 --> 0:16:59.160
<v Speaker 2>don't have two concerns about Oh, Sirtain's gonna takeway. Mike

0:16:59.200 --> 0:17:01.400
<v Speaker 2>Evant like mc evan's could have a Matt Monster game here.

0:17:01.480 --> 0:17:03.720
<v Speaker 2>Chris Godwin still gonna be involved. So and again I

0:17:03.720 --> 0:17:06.119
<v Speaker 2>think with Buccaneers two, they didn't have Vitavea in this

0:17:06.200 --> 0:17:08.840
<v Speaker 2>last game, like he's one of their defensive leaders. In

0:17:08.880 --> 0:17:11.080
<v Speaker 2>that interior you saw it come up big where the

0:17:11.080 --> 0:17:13.840
<v Speaker 2>Broncos were able to protect Bonix, there weren't there was

0:17:13.840 --> 0:17:17.080
<v Speaker 2>in any interior pressure. So I like the Buccaneers here

0:17:17.200 --> 0:17:18.399
<v Speaker 2>at home plus two and a half.

0:17:18.640 --> 0:17:20.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm with you on that one. All right, let's get

0:17:20.280 --> 0:17:22.440
<v Speaker 1>to the next one, the Bengals. We'll see what the

0:17:22.440 --> 0:17:26.679
<v Speaker 1>Bengals do tonight. But Carolina is hosting Cincinnati. They are

0:17:26.720 --> 0:17:29.280
<v Speaker 1>five and a half point underdogs at home. Now, Andy

0:17:29.359 --> 0:17:32.439
<v Speaker 1>Dalton all of a sudden made this team relevant for

0:17:32.480 --> 0:17:34.520
<v Speaker 1>a moment, forty four and a half is the number

0:17:34.880 --> 0:17:39.600
<v Speaker 1>plus two fifteen. Look, I know it was fun. The

0:17:39.600 --> 0:17:43.600
<v Speaker 1>Cincinnati Bengals should go handle their business. However, I'm kind

0:17:43.600 --> 0:17:46.560
<v Speaker 1>of with Carolina and the points here. I also feel

0:17:46.640 --> 0:17:50.600
<v Speaker 1>like depending on what Cincinnati shows up tonight, if Cincinnati

0:17:50.640 --> 0:17:53.240
<v Speaker 1>blows out the Commanders, this line's gonna move to six

0:17:53.280 --> 0:17:56.320
<v Speaker 1>and a half. So I would actually wait on this one.

0:17:56.560 --> 0:17:58.800
<v Speaker 1>If you're watching the show on Monday, let's wait and see.

0:17:58.920 --> 0:18:00.560
<v Speaker 1>If that doesn't happen at we'll stay five. I'm so

0:18:00.640 --> 0:18:02.840
<v Speaker 1>comfortable with the five and a half, but I think

0:18:02.840 --> 0:18:04.879
<v Speaker 1>this one will move a full point if Cincinnati just

0:18:04.920 --> 0:18:07.120
<v Speaker 1>whoops on the Commanders tonight. What are your thoughts? What's

0:18:07.160 --> 0:18:08.320
<v Speaker 1>the outlook for you?

0:18:08.359 --> 0:18:10.280
<v Speaker 2>No, I think there you're spot on with that because

0:18:10.280 --> 0:18:12.800
<v Speaker 2>I expect the Bengals to destroy the Washington Commanders in

0:18:12.840 --> 0:18:15.240
<v Speaker 2>that defense. But then I don't expect them to then

0:18:15.320 --> 0:18:18.680
<v Speaker 2>cover another large spread as a touchdown favorite on the road,

0:18:19.000 --> 0:18:20.560
<v Speaker 2>you know, and back to back weeks. Again, they're playing

0:18:20.560 --> 0:18:22.479
<v Speaker 2>at home tonight, but I don't expect them to have

0:18:22.720 --> 0:18:25.600
<v Speaker 2>a monster game back to back weeks, so especially on

0:18:25.640 --> 0:18:27.120
<v Speaker 2>a short week. So yeah, I think that you gotta

0:18:27.160 --> 0:18:29.160
<v Speaker 2>wait and take the Carolina Pants and the line moves

0:18:29.160 --> 0:18:30.080
<v Speaker 2>to plus six and a half.

0:18:30.400 --> 0:18:33.080
<v Speaker 1>Okay, moving on to the next one. Here, the Denver

0:18:33.119 --> 0:18:35.200
<v Speaker 1>Broncos get a win. The New York Jets get a win.

0:18:35.640 --> 0:18:37.840
<v Speaker 1>The Jets are eight point favorites at home against the

0:18:37.880 --> 0:18:40.480
<v Speaker 1>Denver Broncos. Thirty eight and a half is the number

0:18:40.720 --> 0:18:44.520
<v Speaker 1>plus three ten for the Denver Broncos, So Bonnicks random mock. Look,

0:18:44.720 --> 0:18:47.800
<v Speaker 1>we saw the Jets defense handle the Patriots offense pretty well.

0:18:48.040 --> 0:18:50.439
<v Speaker 1>I have to imagine at home with extra rest, we

0:18:50.480 --> 0:18:52.679
<v Speaker 1>saw that two headed monster in the backfield of Braylan

0:18:52.760 --> 0:18:55.080
<v Speaker 1>Allen and Breese Hall like. Things look pretty good. Here

0:18:55.119 --> 0:18:59.560
<v Speaker 1>for the Jets, they looked excellent. I know Denver kind

0:18:59.560 --> 0:19:01.760
<v Speaker 1>of pulled out there. Could they do it two weeks

0:19:01.760 --> 0:19:03.919
<v Speaker 1>in a row? I say no, But man eight is

0:19:03.960 --> 0:19:05.119
<v Speaker 1>a lot for me to get to.

0:19:06.760 --> 0:19:08.600
<v Speaker 2>It is, but we also have a little bit of

0:19:08.880 --> 0:19:10.639
<v Speaker 2>revenge with Nathaniel Hacket.

0:19:11.840 --> 0:19:15.919
<v Speaker 1>Being a awful person at his job. He was the

0:19:15.920 --> 0:19:17.200
<v Speaker 1>worst coach I've ever seen.

0:19:18.920 --> 0:19:21.760
<v Speaker 2>Honestly, I'm not touching this game. I don't like it.

0:19:21.960 --> 0:19:24.080
<v Speaker 2>Minus eight is a lot and bone and in the

0:19:24.080 --> 0:19:26.159
<v Speaker 2>Broncs I've shown that they're not going to go down quietly,

0:19:26.200 --> 0:19:28.200
<v Speaker 2>like they're gonna chuck the ball and try to get

0:19:28.240 --> 0:19:30.080
<v Speaker 2>back in the game no matter what, which I don't like.

0:19:30.160 --> 0:19:32.439
<v Speaker 2>And at least they again, unlike the Patriots, they do

0:19:32.560 --> 0:19:35.800
<v Speaker 2>have at least some personnel to do that, like they can.

0:19:35.960 --> 0:19:38.639
<v Speaker 2>They've been playing from behind all season, right so except

0:19:38.640 --> 0:19:40.479
<v Speaker 2>for the last week, so I think that they can

0:19:40.520 --> 0:19:43.480
<v Speaker 2>still kind of keep things tight. And yet eight it's

0:19:43.520 --> 0:19:45.040
<v Speaker 2>too much for me. So I'm just gonna probably just

0:19:45.040 --> 0:19:46.000
<v Speaker 2>shy away. Keep me the under.

0:19:46.280 --> 0:19:49.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm just kidding. Yeah, under is probably the best bet.

0:19:49.359 --> 0:19:51.159
<v Speaker 1>I think, maybe just individual self, I say away from

0:19:51.200 --> 0:19:55.679
<v Speaker 1>this game. This game bothers me. Washington Arizona again. I

0:19:55.680 --> 0:19:57.600
<v Speaker 1>want to see what Washington does tonight. I don't have

0:19:57.600 --> 0:20:00.200
<v Speaker 1>a full take on this game quite yet. Five is

0:20:00.240 --> 0:20:03.119
<v Speaker 1>the number here where Arizona's favorite at home. Forty nine

0:20:03.160 --> 0:20:06.399
<v Speaker 1>and a half is the total plus one ninety five

0:20:06.520 --> 0:20:10.120
<v Speaker 1>for the Washington commanders of the money line ericson look.

0:20:10.440 --> 0:20:12.359
<v Speaker 1>I think Arizona is another one of these work in

0:20:12.359 --> 0:20:15.520
<v Speaker 1>progress teams. This is an opportunity where they're getting a

0:20:15.600 --> 0:20:18.040
<v Speaker 1>lesser opponent at home. You know, they've had to play

0:20:18.080 --> 0:20:21.119
<v Speaker 1>the Buffalo Bills, They've had to play the Detroit Lions,

0:20:21.119 --> 0:20:23.639
<v Speaker 1>like they've had that schedule stack. This feels like an

0:20:23.720 --> 0:20:26.520
<v Speaker 1>Arizona win. But at the same time, I don't know

0:20:26.600 --> 0:20:28.439
<v Speaker 1>if I'm there with the five yet. Where are you

0:20:28.480 --> 0:20:29.400
<v Speaker 1>at with this one?

0:20:29.680 --> 0:20:32.080
<v Speaker 2>So actually, like the under in this game. I know

0:20:32.119 --> 0:20:34.480
<v Speaker 2>that the Commander deference is horrible, but it's a forty

0:20:34.560 --> 0:20:37.560
<v Speaker 2>nine and a half, right, It's a number, massive number.

0:20:37.680 --> 0:20:40.000
<v Speaker 2>For Again, we're talking about how offenses are down and

0:20:40.040 --> 0:20:42.680
<v Speaker 2>scoring and this is I think the largest over under,

0:20:42.800 --> 0:20:45.600
<v Speaker 2>or maybe one of the largest over over unders on

0:20:45.960 --> 0:20:48.960
<v Speaker 2>this week four slates. So for me, again, like I

0:20:49.000 --> 0:20:52.119
<v Speaker 2>don't know how great this Commander's offense really is, Like

0:20:52.280 --> 0:20:55.760
<v Speaker 2>they have very questionable offensive line. Yes, Jane Daniel is fun,

0:20:55.880 --> 0:20:58.399
<v Speaker 2>he runs around, but it's not like he's orchestrating drives

0:20:58.400 --> 0:21:00.320
<v Speaker 2>that are generating a ton of touchdowns. I mean, they

0:21:00.400 --> 0:21:03.880
<v Speaker 2>beat the Giants by kicking field goals, right, so they're

0:21:03.880 --> 0:21:06.879
<v Speaker 2>not converting to a lot of touchdowns. So again, I

0:21:07.200 --> 0:21:10.000
<v Speaker 2>think that this game is gonna be not as high scoring. Again,

0:21:10.400 --> 0:21:12.560
<v Speaker 2>just going back to the fact that scoring is down

0:21:12.720 --> 0:21:14.720
<v Speaker 2>overall at forty nine and a half, I'm just kind

0:21:14.720 --> 0:21:16.200
<v Speaker 2>of gotta bet against that. And like I think Cardinals

0:21:16.240 --> 0:21:18.160
<v Speaker 2>take care of business, but I'll take the under.

0:21:18.840 --> 0:21:21.400
<v Speaker 1>Speaking of unders, Vingo, Patriots, they played to the under

0:21:21.440 --> 0:21:23.760
<v Speaker 1>on Thursday, told you so if you hope you're watching

0:21:23.760 --> 0:21:26.159
<v Speaker 1>that Thursday Night Football stuff, man, I got a lot

0:21:26.200 --> 0:21:29.080
<v Speaker 1>to live up to too. Thursday Night Football nailed the

0:21:29.160 --> 0:21:31.439
<v Speaker 1>two leg parlay of that one on the show with

0:21:31.480 --> 0:21:34.280
<v Speaker 1>the anytime touchdowns score for Breze Hall and the under

0:21:34.320 --> 0:21:36.720
<v Speaker 1>in the game three for three on last week's Monday

0:21:36.800 --> 0:21:39.200
<v Speaker 1>Night Bets. I don't know, maybe I should just retire ericson.

0:21:39.280 --> 0:21:41.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, like maybe maybe this is it. This

0:21:41.440 --> 0:21:43.520
<v Speaker 1>is missus as good as it's gonna get. I'm gonna

0:21:43.560 --> 0:21:48.200
<v Speaker 1>do my best to repeat this tire on top. Thank you, folks.

0:21:48.240 --> 0:21:51.000
<v Speaker 1>Good night, Patriots. Forty nine ers. The forty nine ers

0:21:51.040 --> 0:21:53.160
<v Speaker 1>are ten and a half point favorites in this game.

0:21:53.720 --> 0:21:56.679
<v Speaker 1>Forty and a half is the number the Patriots for

0:21:56.760 --> 0:21:59.520
<v Speaker 1>upset is plus four forty. I mean, look, the Patriots

0:21:59.560 --> 0:22:01.040
<v Speaker 1>are no good and I think you and I both

0:22:01.080 --> 0:22:04.400
<v Speaker 1>recognize that offensive line is dreadful. But we also thought

0:22:04.400 --> 0:22:06.520
<v Speaker 1>the Rams offensive line was dreadful. The thing they don't

0:22:06.560 --> 0:22:09.280
<v Speaker 1>have is they don't have Stafford. They don't have McVeigh.

0:22:09.320 --> 0:22:11.520
<v Speaker 1>What they are getting is a San Francisco forty nine

0:22:11.560 --> 0:22:13.040
<v Speaker 1>er team at home is going to be pissed off.

0:22:13.240 --> 0:22:15.320
<v Speaker 1>I think it's gonna be an ugly situation. Ten is

0:22:15.359 --> 0:22:17.440
<v Speaker 1>a lot. I'm staying away from this one. I got

0:22:17.440 --> 0:22:20.720
<v Speaker 1>no love for this game. Ken New England do its

0:22:20.760 --> 0:22:23.359
<v Speaker 1>part in this game? Probably not? So maybe the under

0:22:23.440 --> 0:22:26.080
<v Speaker 1>is my best notion for this. This feels like a

0:22:27.680 --> 0:22:30.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, twenty seven to ten kind of a deal,

0:22:30.840 --> 0:22:32.719
<v Speaker 1>like maybe more what are your thoughts?

0:22:33.480 --> 0:22:35.600
<v Speaker 2>Honestly, I'd kind of like the over in this game.

0:22:36.040 --> 0:22:39.520
<v Speaker 1>Well, but what's that score? And I guess here's the question.

0:22:40.040 --> 0:22:42.359
<v Speaker 1>Maybe I look for the team total of the Patriots

0:22:42.359 --> 0:22:44.280
<v Speaker 1>and bet the under on whatever that is. Like maybe

0:22:44.320 --> 0:22:47.000
<v Speaker 1>that's where I live, and I just don't even muck

0:22:47.040 --> 0:22:50.880
<v Speaker 1>around with them the combined total because there's a lot

0:22:50.880 --> 0:22:51.680
<v Speaker 1>of variants here.

0:22:53.040 --> 0:22:56.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, I don't like ten and a half

0:22:56.359 --> 0:22:58.919
<v Speaker 2>points at home against any team. Again, this is the NFL, right,

0:22:58.920 --> 0:23:00.879
<v Speaker 2>that's hard to cover that spread. But we've seen the

0:23:00.880 --> 0:23:03.359
<v Speaker 2>forty nine ers team at home be a death star

0:23:03.920 --> 0:23:06.639
<v Speaker 2>and just totally blow teams. And you said they just

0:23:06.680 --> 0:23:09.639
<v Speaker 2>blew that lead against the Rams. That's a horrible loss.

0:23:10.160 --> 0:23:12.760
<v Speaker 2>So how do you lick your wounds as you come

0:23:12.800 --> 0:23:14.399
<v Speaker 2>back and try the Patriots?

0:23:14.840 --> 0:23:16.679
<v Speaker 1>So what's the team total? In your mind? If you

0:23:16.680 --> 0:23:18.400
<v Speaker 1>were setting it for the forty nine ers, what would

0:23:18.440 --> 0:23:21.240
<v Speaker 1>that number be? Thirty five and a half?

0:23:21.960 --> 0:23:22.880
<v Speaker 2>Thirty five and a half?

0:23:23.240 --> 0:23:24.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I mean, is that too much my

0:23:25.040 --> 0:23:26.159
<v Speaker 1>being being glib?

0:23:26.720 --> 0:23:28.840
<v Speaker 2>You don't. I mean that's why I just like the

0:23:29.080 --> 0:23:31.760
<v Speaker 2>game over right, I mean the Patriots again, turnovers is

0:23:31.800 --> 0:23:35.080
<v Speaker 2>a thing. They can generate turnovers on defense, but it

0:23:35.080 --> 0:23:36.600
<v Speaker 2>also does depends like how many of the fort nine

0:23:36.640 --> 0:23:38.320
<v Speaker 2>ers weapons come back? Do you get George Kittle back

0:23:38.320 --> 0:23:41.760
<v Speaker 2>in this game? So I don't know. Maybe the again,

0:23:41.880 --> 0:23:43.880
<v Speaker 2>I have to probably lick a little deeper again because

0:23:43.880 --> 0:23:45.720
<v Speaker 2>I have to watch this game as a Patriots fan.

0:23:45.840 --> 0:23:47.879
<v Speaker 2>I know they're not going to win. So you know

0:23:48.000 --> 0:23:50.679
<v Speaker 2>how I do? I bleed the Blue White?

0:23:50.920 --> 0:23:52.520
<v Speaker 1>I do too, but I don't have to watch them

0:23:52.560 --> 0:23:56.400
<v Speaker 1>bleed they I'm just gonna be bleeding. You know, there's

0:23:56.440 --> 0:23:58.840
<v Speaker 1>other games to be watching. It's one thing of a standalone.

0:23:58.840 --> 0:24:01.280
<v Speaker 1>Of course, that's a standalone, But it's four o'clock. I

0:24:01.280 --> 0:24:04.960
<v Speaker 1>could be watching things like the Cleveland Browns and the Raiders.

0:24:04.560 --> 0:24:06.440
<v Speaker 2>I watch the Dallas Cowboys, though.

0:24:07.320 --> 0:24:10.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm watching them on Thursday night. So Cleveland Vegas, here

0:24:10.720 --> 0:24:14.600
<v Speaker 1>you go, U one and a half point underdogs. The

0:24:14.680 --> 0:24:18.199
<v Speaker 1>Las Vegas Raiders are god. The Raiders are infuriating. You

0:24:18.280 --> 0:24:20.879
<v Speaker 1>beat the Ravens at home, and then you get in

0:24:20.920 --> 0:24:23.720
<v Speaker 1>their building and then you get destroyed by the Carolina

0:24:23.800 --> 0:24:27.240
<v Speaker 1>Panth's in your own building. I got nothing, I got nothing.

0:24:27.280 --> 0:24:30.520
<v Speaker 1>Erickson thirty seven and a half minus one fifteen on

0:24:30.520 --> 0:24:32.119
<v Speaker 1>the money line for the given Browns, minus one of

0:24:32.200 --> 0:24:34.160
<v Speaker 1>five for the Vegas Raiders. I'm running away from this game.

0:24:34.240 --> 0:24:36.240
<v Speaker 1>This game is a hot mess to me. I want

0:24:36.280 --> 0:24:38.320
<v Speaker 1>nothing to do with it. This week, I'm very picky

0:24:38.320 --> 0:24:39.760
<v Speaker 1>Week four, very picky.

0:24:41.320 --> 0:24:46.119
<v Speaker 2>I like the under and I like the Browns. I

0:24:46.200 --> 0:24:51.200
<v Speaker 2>like the Browns on the road as favorites because Max

0:24:51.240 --> 0:24:53.600
<v Speaker 2>Crosby's dealing with an injury and he is the heart

0:24:53.600 --> 0:24:56.479
<v Speaker 2>and soul of that defense. And if he's one hundred percent,

0:24:56.880 --> 0:24:59.679
<v Speaker 2>then the Raiders don't have a chance, right because he's

0:24:59.680 --> 0:25:02.320
<v Speaker 2>their best He is their best player, no doubt about it,

0:25:02.359 --> 0:25:04.359
<v Speaker 2>in my opinion. Especially he's the one that is the

0:25:04.359 --> 0:25:06.159
<v Speaker 2>engine to that defense. So if they don't have him,

0:25:06.240 --> 0:25:08.679
<v Speaker 2>especially with the biggest weakness of the Browns is pass protection.

0:25:09.200 --> 0:25:11.680
<v Speaker 2>They should get those tackles back. I believe that Jack

0:25:11.720 --> 0:25:13.600
<v Speaker 2>Conklin and Jedrick Willis are still trying to get back

0:25:13.720 --> 0:25:16.040
<v Speaker 2>after missing so much time. Those guys are healthy. But

0:25:16.160 --> 0:25:18.320
<v Speaker 2>Cleveland is this up and down team. Right, one week

0:25:18.320 --> 0:25:19.919
<v Speaker 2>they play horrible and next week they play good, next

0:25:19.960 --> 0:25:23.720
<v Speaker 2>week the horrible. So I will back Cleveland here as

0:25:24.520 --> 0:25:25.160
<v Speaker 2>road favorites.

0:25:25.560 --> 0:25:27.359
<v Speaker 1>All right. One of the great things here about the

0:25:27.359 --> 0:25:30.639
<v Speaker 1>Betting Pros app is also the Systems tool, and our

0:25:30.640 --> 0:25:32.600
<v Speaker 1>new Betting Pro Systems tools is designed to help you

0:25:32.960 --> 0:25:35.119
<v Speaker 1>find winning strategies and make smarter bets. So you can

0:25:35.119 --> 0:25:38.080
<v Speaker 1>customize the betting systems by sport, by bet type, and

0:25:38.160 --> 0:25:42.000
<v Speaker 1>timeframe to find the best opportunities using real time data

0:25:42.000 --> 0:25:44.560
<v Speaker 1>and expert analysis, so you could track your performance of

0:25:44.640 --> 0:25:47.159
<v Speaker 1>different betting systems over time and optimize your bets to

0:25:47.160 --> 0:25:50.440
<v Speaker 1>increase your chances of success. Again, download the app today

0:25:50.520 --> 0:25:53.840
<v Speaker 1>or Betting Pros and elevate your betting strategies to make

0:25:54.000 --> 0:25:56.359
<v Speaker 1>smarter bets. Let's see if we can make a smart

0:25:56.359 --> 0:25:58.640
<v Speaker 1>bet on this next game, Andrew. It's the Kansas City

0:25:58.720 --> 0:26:01.520
<v Speaker 1>Chiefs come off all lucky. Victory at the end there, boy,

0:26:01.600 --> 0:26:04.640
<v Speaker 1>they get hose on that call. The Atlanta Falcons ooh,

0:26:04.880 --> 0:26:07.360
<v Speaker 1>terrible call. At the end of that game, Chiefs get

0:26:07.359 --> 0:26:09.439
<v Speaker 1>a victory. They're nine and a half point favorites on

0:26:09.440 --> 0:26:14.399
<v Speaker 1>the road against the Chargers. Herbert's health in question. Thirty

0:26:14.480 --> 0:26:17.359
<v Speaker 1>nine is the number for this game? Again, very heavy

0:26:17.440 --> 0:26:19.960
<v Speaker 1>Kansas City Chiefs plus three twenty on the money line

0:26:20.000 --> 0:26:23.320
<v Speaker 1>for the Chargers. Like that, that's the value here is

0:26:24.160 --> 0:26:26.480
<v Speaker 1>the Chargers just to pull off a freaky shop seat.

0:26:26.560 --> 0:26:29.159
<v Speaker 1>That's the value of this game. The question is do

0:26:29.200 --> 0:26:30.480
<v Speaker 1>I want to bet on it? I think the answer

0:26:30.520 --> 0:26:30.680
<v Speaker 1>is no.

0:26:31.840 --> 0:26:34.439
<v Speaker 2>So it's interesting because you look at the Chiefs right

0:26:34.520 --> 0:26:36.400
<v Speaker 2>and what they've done. You know, how close are they

0:26:36.400 --> 0:26:39.720
<v Speaker 2>to being an zero to three team? Very actually looks washed,

0:26:40.000 --> 0:26:44.920
<v Speaker 2>Kelsey looks washed. The backfield is a mess. I mean, yeah, yeah,

0:26:44.960 --> 0:26:48.200
<v Speaker 2>they look disfunction on offense, right, and you think about

0:26:48.200 --> 0:26:49.840
<v Speaker 2>what's andy REI They're going to figure it out, but

0:26:50.240 --> 0:26:53.120
<v Speaker 2>holy we run around and yes, again, this isn't their

0:26:53.200 --> 0:26:55.480
<v Speaker 2>time to shine right there. We don't care about the

0:26:55.480 --> 0:26:57.359
<v Speaker 2>regular season. We just want to get to the playoffs

0:26:57.480 --> 0:26:58.920
<v Speaker 2>and win the Super Bowl, right, and we know they're

0:26:58.920 --> 0:27:00.840
<v Speaker 2>going to get to the playoffs potentially be the number

0:27:00.880 --> 0:27:05.080
<v Speaker 2>one seeds, which as they beat other AFC powerhouses. So yes,

0:27:05.119 --> 0:27:07.119
<v Speaker 2>I agree with you. I think the the value is

0:27:07.160 --> 0:27:09.359
<v Speaker 2>on the Chargers. Now. Is just Herbert going to playing

0:27:09.359 --> 0:27:12.399
<v Speaker 2>this game? We we don't know. But my point is

0:27:12.760 --> 0:27:14.919
<v Speaker 2>if the Chargers beat the Chiefs, it's not because of

0:27:14.920 --> 0:27:17.639
<v Speaker 2>their quarterback play. It's because they run the football on

0:27:17.680 --> 0:27:19.760
<v Speaker 2>the Chiefs. Like that's how they win this game. So

0:27:20.520 --> 0:27:23.160
<v Speaker 2>I would wait, honestly and be like, oh, Herbert's out, Okay,

0:27:23.200 --> 0:27:25.160
<v Speaker 2>the line moves more on the Chiefs because it's Taylor

0:27:25.200 --> 0:27:28.159
<v Speaker 2>Heinike whatever, it doesn't matter, because don't think justin Herbert's

0:27:28.160 --> 0:27:30.000
<v Speaker 2>gonna be the reason why they win or lose this game.

0:27:30.040 --> 0:27:33.639
<v Speaker 2>It's going to be Dobbins, Yeah, east to Stick Taylor.

0:27:33.680 --> 0:27:36.119
<v Speaker 2>I think Taylor Heinekee might actually, I mean Stick was

0:27:36.640 --> 0:27:39.040
<v Speaker 2>horrible in the preseason. I think that's why they went

0:27:39.080 --> 0:27:43.320
<v Speaker 2>and so il the week.

0:27:43.520 --> 0:27:46.440
<v Speaker 1>You take the Chargers and the Patriots on the money lining,

0:27:46.480 --> 0:27:48.560
<v Speaker 1>which is chaos.

0:27:49.720 --> 0:27:51.560
<v Speaker 2>Oh my dude, that's the best way to enjoy the

0:27:51.600 --> 0:27:52.680
<v Speaker 2>afternoon slate, right.

0:27:53.560 --> 0:27:55.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean, look, you're probably lighting your money on fire,

0:27:55.480 --> 0:27:57.919
<v Speaker 1>but like I mean, you can get on a favorite

0:27:57.920 --> 0:28:00.040
<v Speaker 1>and light your money on fire that way, don't you do?

0:28:00.080 --> 0:28:03.360
<v Speaker 1>You know you get those bonus bets right the DraftKings

0:28:03.359 --> 0:28:03.680
<v Speaker 1>gives you.

0:28:03.600 --> 0:28:05.320
<v Speaker 2>The bonus a touchdown bets.

0:28:06.040 --> 0:28:08.159
<v Speaker 1>You take the bonus bet, you throw it on the

0:28:08.240 --> 0:28:10.280
<v Speaker 1>Chargers this week, and you watch it and you see, hey,

0:28:10.480 --> 0:28:13.680
<v Speaker 1>that's some fun. It was found money anyway. Buffalo Baltimore

0:28:13.680 --> 0:28:16.000
<v Speaker 1>are next one on our list here. The Baltimore Ravens

0:28:16.000 --> 0:28:18.240
<v Speaker 1>are two and a half point favorites at home. Forty

0:28:18.240 --> 0:28:20.359
<v Speaker 1>four and a half is the number plus one fifteen

0:28:20.359 --> 0:28:24.000
<v Speaker 1>for the Buffalo Bills to win this one. Get so,

0:28:24.240 --> 0:28:27.639
<v Speaker 1>Ravens looks great. Ravens are a good team. Ravens, I

0:28:27.640 --> 0:28:30.080
<v Speaker 1>think just you know, got off to a weird, wacky start.

0:28:30.240 --> 0:28:33.320
<v Speaker 1>This is exactly what they needed, a huge win in Dallas.

0:28:33.359 --> 0:28:35.520
<v Speaker 1>I think they're going to be right here. I'm taking

0:28:35.520 --> 0:28:38.320
<v Speaker 1>Baltimore with the points here at minus two and a half.

0:28:38.400 --> 0:28:40.880
<v Speaker 1>I think Baltimore is a better football team than the

0:28:40.920 --> 0:28:43.240
<v Speaker 1>Buffalo Bills. I don't care what the Bills do or

0:28:43.280 --> 0:28:45.600
<v Speaker 1>don't do on Monday Night. I think there's early value

0:28:45.600 --> 0:28:48.360
<v Speaker 1>in this one. If you think Buffalo is going to

0:28:48.400 --> 0:28:50.840
<v Speaker 1>trounce Jacksonville and you think this one shrinks to one

0:28:50.840 --> 0:28:53.040
<v Speaker 1>and a half, then you would wait on it and

0:28:53.080 --> 0:28:55.440
<v Speaker 1>they don't bet it now. But Andrew, what's your approach

0:28:55.520 --> 0:28:57.320
<v Speaker 1>to Bill's Ravens?

0:28:57.640 --> 0:28:59.920
<v Speaker 2>So, like I said, I think Jacksonville is going to

0:28:59.960 --> 0:29:01.880
<v Speaker 2>be plucky in this matchup against the Bills, So I

0:29:01.920 --> 0:29:04.000
<v Speaker 2>think that you're gonna get some value waiting for So

0:29:04.000 --> 0:29:06.320
<v Speaker 2>I like the Buffalo side here because I get Josh

0:29:06.320 --> 0:29:08.760
<v Speaker 2>Allen's an underdog, right that when I get bet on

0:29:08.800 --> 0:29:12.000
<v Speaker 2>elite quarterbacks as underdogs again with the Eagles and Saints, right,

0:29:12.000 --> 0:29:14.920
<v Speaker 2>it was Jalen Hurts as an underdog. Right last week,

0:29:15.000 --> 0:29:17.160
<v Speaker 2>you know, the Ravens open up as underdogs and I

0:29:17.160 --> 0:29:19.160
<v Speaker 2>was like, oh, I'm gonna bet Lamar jackson as an underdog. Great,

0:29:19.160 --> 0:29:21.960
<v Speaker 2>I feel great about it. When Josh Allen played the Dolphins,

0:29:22.040 --> 0:29:24.120
<v Speaker 2>he was an underdog and they won out right. So

0:29:24.320 --> 0:29:26.880
<v Speaker 2>when I get these elite quarterbacks as underdogs, that's the

0:29:26.880 --> 0:29:29.040
<v Speaker 2>approach I want to go with. So I like Josh

0:29:29.080 --> 0:29:30.840
<v Speaker 2>Allen and the Bills here, But like I said, I

0:29:30.840 --> 0:29:32.880
<v Speaker 2>think that the value is going to move in the

0:29:32.920 --> 0:29:35.400
<v Speaker 2>favor of the Bills after they play Jacksonville. So I'm

0:29:35.400 --> 0:29:36.320
<v Speaker 2>gonna wait on this one.

0:29:36.640 --> 0:29:40.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, all right, there you go. Let's go to Tennessee Miami.

0:29:41.800 --> 0:29:44.240
<v Speaker 1>Miami's defense is dreadful. I think you do get Tyler

0:29:44.320 --> 0:29:45.960
<v Speaker 1>Huntley in this game, I really do. I think you

0:29:46.000 --> 0:29:49.240
<v Speaker 1>saw enough. Thomson just kids. He's also he also got hurt,

0:29:49.280 --> 0:29:51.640
<v Speaker 1>so I mean injury was not whatever. It doesn't matter

0:29:51.640 --> 0:29:52.880
<v Speaker 1>even if he wasn't hurt. I don't care. I don't

0:29:52.880 --> 0:29:54.880
<v Speaker 1>want to see it again. Tennessee Titans are zero and three.

0:29:55.040 --> 0:29:57.840
<v Speaker 1>Will Evis is terrible. They just lost them. Elie Willis.

0:29:58.760 --> 0:30:01.120
<v Speaker 1>There's lots of Lague Willis that are building. Oh my god,

0:30:01.400 --> 0:30:04.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, good on lafloor. Lafleur must be loving life.

0:30:04.240 --> 0:30:04.880
<v Speaker 1>He's the head.

0:30:04.880 --> 0:30:07.600
<v Speaker 2>He has to be winning coach of the year, right.

0:30:07.440 --> 0:30:11.280
<v Speaker 1>He's not. Harbor is the number one guy, Harbaugh Mcdonaldgers.

0:30:11.400 --> 0:30:13.560
<v Speaker 1>Going into yesterday, it was I don't know today. Going

0:30:13.560 --> 0:30:15.800
<v Speaker 1>into yesterday, it was Harball, it was McDonald, and it

0:30:15.840 --> 0:30:16.640
<v Speaker 1>was Kevin O'Connell.

0:30:17.000 --> 0:30:18.959
<v Speaker 2>That's a good Kevin O'Connell. Yeah, I mean I think

0:30:18.960 --> 0:30:20.920
<v Speaker 2>before should be up there though, I mean over McDonald.

0:30:21.000 --> 0:30:24.280
<v Speaker 2>McDonald has played crappy teams all year, okay three and

0:30:24.440 --> 0:30:28.400
<v Speaker 2>gets bo Nicks, Pip Patriots and Skyler Thomps the year.

0:30:28.520 --> 0:30:30.080
<v Speaker 2>Here you go, Okay, coach the year as a job. Well,

0:30:30.080 --> 0:30:32.440
<v Speaker 2>they're playing the lines this week. I guarantee those odds

0:30:32.440 --> 0:30:33.920
<v Speaker 2>are gonna go way down.

0:30:34.400 --> 0:30:39.480
<v Speaker 1>Dolphins at home plus one and a half underdogs. I'm sorry,

0:30:39.520 --> 0:30:41.800
<v Speaker 1>I can't get there. Give me the points with Miami.

0:30:42.040 --> 0:30:44.840
<v Speaker 1>Thirty seven and a half is the number. Uh minus

0:30:44.880 --> 0:30:47.000
<v Speaker 1>won twelve for the Tennessee Titans on the money line,

0:30:47.000 --> 0:30:50.280
<v Speaker 1>minus one o five on the Miami Dolphins. Uh So

0:30:50.520 --> 0:30:53.240
<v Speaker 1>you know what, actually, you know it's this is easy.

0:30:53.360 --> 0:30:54.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm on the Miami side of this one. I think

0:30:55.280 --> 0:30:58.160
<v Speaker 1>things come around. By the way, as we're doing the show,

0:30:58.960 --> 0:31:02.960
<v Speaker 1>update on Justin, Herber reaggravated his high ankle sprain. Extras

0:31:03.000 --> 0:31:07.160
<v Speaker 1>came back negative. Herbert mentioned will be monitored throughout the week,

0:31:07.280 --> 0:31:10.520
<v Speaker 1>so we'll see how that goes. Again, hold your breath

0:31:10.560 --> 0:31:13.520
<v Speaker 1>and hope, but I don't think even more reason watch

0:31:13.560 --> 0:31:15.480
<v Speaker 1>that number go to plus four hundred.

0:31:15.520 --> 0:31:18.560
<v Speaker 2>Early take here, he's not gonna play because again Harbaugh

0:31:18.560 --> 0:31:19.320
<v Speaker 2>doesn't need Justin.

0:31:19.360 --> 0:31:21.840
<v Speaker 1>Well, then I can't use my bonus bet. I can't

0:31:21.920 --> 0:31:23.600
<v Speaker 1>do it. I can't use my bonus bets if he

0:31:23.600 --> 0:31:26.320
<v Speaker 1>doesn't play. I can't do that. So waste.

0:31:26.440 --> 0:31:28.320
<v Speaker 2>You're not gonna take the Chargers to win with Taylor

0:31:28.360 --> 0:31:30.719
<v Speaker 2>Ronik against the Chiefs. Didn't the Chiefs lose to eight

0:31:30.720 --> 0:31:33.360
<v Speaker 2>and O'Connell last year at home.

0:31:33.640 --> 0:31:36.040
<v Speaker 1>If they go to if it goes to plus five hundred,

0:31:36.040 --> 0:31:37.800
<v Speaker 1>then I might have no choice. I might have to

0:31:38.880 --> 0:31:40.160
<v Speaker 1>take my dude.

0:31:40.320 --> 0:31:42.720
<v Speaker 2>I mean, we see so much crazy stuff happen.

0:31:43.000 --> 0:31:45.440
<v Speaker 1>That's why I'm saying it. That's why I'm saying it.

0:31:45.520 --> 0:31:50.200
<v Speaker 1>I think it's early, It's only Monday, Andrew Thursday shows

0:31:50.200 --> 0:31:52.760
<v Speaker 1>a few days away. It might be the upset special

0:31:52.800 --> 0:31:54.840
<v Speaker 1>the week. I'm just saying it's a tease. We'll see

0:31:54.840 --> 0:31:57.560
<v Speaker 1>how it could. Back to Miami and Tennessee. I'm on

0:31:57.600 --> 0:31:59.840
<v Speaker 1>Miami in this game. I just am like, I know,

0:32:00.080 --> 0:32:02.160
<v Speaker 1>was terrible. They were on the road. I get it.

0:32:02.160 --> 0:32:04.760
<v Speaker 1>It's like I think is a good quarterback. I think

0:32:04.800 --> 0:32:06.760
<v Speaker 1>if we've shown him with the Baltimore Ravens, you've give

0:32:06.800 --> 0:32:08.400
<v Speaker 1>him weapons, he'll be Okay. What do you think?

0:32:09.000 --> 0:32:10.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah? I think that I was watching that game closely

0:32:10.880 --> 0:32:13.960
<v Speaker 2>obviously because I like the Dolphins and they were actually

0:32:14.760 --> 0:32:17.040
<v Speaker 2>they were like the Seahawks did not put them away

0:32:17.280 --> 0:32:18.120
<v Speaker 2>till very.

0:32:18.240 --> 0:32:20.440
<v Speaker 1>But the defense just sucks the problems. I don't think.

0:32:21.160 --> 0:32:24.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, well, Levis can't take advantage of the defense, and

0:32:24.320 --> 0:32:26.680
<v Speaker 2>you look at what Miami can do offensively. I mean,

0:32:26.720 --> 0:32:28.480
<v Speaker 2>everybody played bad in that game. Like Tyror Hill was

0:32:28.560 --> 0:32:32.280
<v Speaker 2>dropping passes. They were involving like these backup tight ends

0:32:32.320 --> 0:32:34.560
<v Speaker 2>alec Ingold out of the backfield seeing a bunch of targets.

0:32:34.560 --> 0:32:35.840
<v Speaker 2>I had no idea like that. I didn't think it

0:32:35.880 --> 0:32:38.240
<v Speaker 2>was a good game plan back at home against the

0:32:38.280 --> 0:32:41.040
<v Speaker 2>tight ends who just got ripped up by Malik Willis.

0:32:41.440 --> 0:32:45.080
<v Speaker 2>Of all quarterbacks, I think McDaniel is able to kind

0:32:45.120 --> 0:32:47.400
<v Speaker 2>of get the ship right on offense, especially you know,

0:32:47.440 --> 0:32:48.760
<v Speaker 2>if they move with Tyler Huntley, he can do a

0:32:48.760 --> 0:32:51.240
<v Speaker 2>little bit more. Again, a Pro Bowl quarterback. So I

0:32:51.360 --> 0:32:52.560
<v Speaker 2>like Dolphins here as well.

0:32:52.760 --> 0:32:55.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, just give me Dolphins straight up money line minus

0:32:55.600 --> 0:32:58.280
<v Speaker 1>one ten. It's the best value I can find. Just

0:32:58.280 --> 0:33:00.280
<v Speaker 1>just just let me have it, all right, Let's get

0:33:00.280 --> 0:33:03.040
<v Speaker 1>to the last one here. Again, these are Monday night

0:33:03.040 --> 0:33:07.040
<v Speaker 1>games too, So Tennessee Miami Monday Night. Congratulations America. Uh.

0:33:07.160 --> 0:33:09.880
<v Speaker 1>And then you're going to be getting another Monday night

0:33:09.920 --> 0:33:11.880
<v Speaker 1>football game at eight to fifteen star. The other one

0:33:11.880 --> 0:33:14.960
<v Speaker 1>starts at seven thirty Seattle in Detroit. Now this one's

0:33:15.000 --> 0:33:17.680
<v Speaker 1>more interesting. We're are we gonna finally get to find

0:33:17.720 --> 0:33:20.720
<v Speaker 1>out who Seattle is? Maybe they're four and a half

0:33:20.800 --> 0:33:24.240
<v Speaker 1>point underdogs on the road in Detroit. Forty eight and

0:33:24.240 --> 0:33:26.880
<v Speaker 1>a half is the number plus one seventy for the

0:33:26.880 --> 0:33:30.520
<v Speaker 1>Seattle Seahawks. I like Seattle with the points here, Andrew,

0:33:30.560 --> 0:33:31.320
<v Speaker 1>what are your thoughts?

0:33:32.400 --> 0:33:35.000
<v Speaker 2>I think that we're gonna see Seattle get exposed.

0:33:34.640 --> 0:33:37.480
<v Speaker 1>Here gay on opposite ends, this is gonna be fun

0:33:37.520 --> 0:33:39.640
<v Speaker 1>Monday night. I mean, the text chain is back, but

0:33:40.160 --> 0:33:42.280
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna be back in texted on Monday night. It's

0:33:42.320 --> 0:33:42.840
<v Speaker 1>gonna be I.

0:33:42.760 --> 0:33:45.200
<v Speaker 2>Mean I mentioned before they haven't played a legitimate offense

0:33:45.200 --> 0:33:47.400
<v Speaker 2>and when they were going to their quarterback got hurt.

0:33:47.880 --> 0:33:50.080
<v Speaker 2>They played Scott de Troit really.

0:33:49.880 --> 0:33:53.240
<v Speaker 1>Blown the doors. Detroit's my Super Bowl pick from the NFC.

0:33:54.320 --> 0:33:58.600
<v Speaker 1>They've been fine, but they haven't, like to me, asserted

0:33:58.600 --> 0:34:01.600
<v Speaker 1>their dominance yet. Where I'm looking, I'm like, yeah, that's

0:34:01.640 --> 0:34:03.840
<v Speaker 1>the Detroit Lions. I want to see, Like I think.

0:34:03.640 --> 0:34:05.880
<v Speaker 2>That this is this is a statement game. Yeah, I

0:34:05.920 --> 0:34:07.880
<v Speaker 2>think this is going to be an eye opener for

0:34:08.000 --> 0:34:10.839
<v Speaker 2>both sides and talk about how hey, oh, these are

0:34:10.840 --> 0:34:14.719
<v Speaker 2>two NFC powerhouses. Seattle's undefeated. Yeah, well they're not gonna

0:34:14.760 --> 0:34:15.759
<v Speaker 2>undefeated after this game.

0:34:15.840 --> 0:34:17.719
<v Speaker 1>You know what I might have to do if I'm

0:34:17.719 --> 0:34:19.560
<v Speaker 1>buying into this narrative, I might have to buy into

0:34:19.600 --> 0:34:21.719
<v Speaker 1>it all the way. If I think Seattle has a

0:34:21.719 --> 0:34:24.560
<v Speaker 1>shot this game, and I do, this might be the

0:34:24.600 --> 0:34:28.520
<v Speaker 1>time to jump on the line for them for the

0:34:28.640 --> 0:34:32.960
<v Speaker 1>NFC West, because then there'll be four oh and then

0:34:33.000 --> 0:34:38.200
<v Speaker 1>when our patriots take it to the forty nine, we'll

0:34:38.200 --> 0:34:40.719
<v Speaker 1>see what I happened. All jokes aside, though, all jokes aside.

0:34:41.480 --> 0:34:43.960
<v Speaker 1>Seattle again, they can only play who's in front of them.

0:34:44.200 --> 0:34:46.280
<v Speaker 1>Their schedule is not as bad as some other teams.

0:34:46.320 --> 0:34:48.160
<v Speaker 2>Well, they haven't played any of their NFC rest team

0:34:48.200 --> 0:34:48.720
<v Speaker 2>they haven't.

0:34:48.840 --> 0:34:51.520
<v Speaker 1>But the thing is all their NFC rivals right now,

0:34:51.520 --> 0:34:54.680
<v Speaker 1>are we? You know, the Rams are weak and the

0:34:54.719 --> 0:34:56.320
<v Speaker 1>forty nine ers a week they're both at their weakest

0:34:56.320 --> 0:34:59.520
<v Speaker 1>point in terms of health. Like those games are coming up.

0:35:00.120 --> 0:35:02.640
<v Speaker 1>Be really interesting to see what happens here. So maybe

0:35:02.680 --> 0:35:07.359
<v Speaker 1>Seattle finally gets that corrective moment. Maybe not, I don't know.

0:35:07.640 --> 0:35:09.560
<v Speaker 1>I think either way, the best bet here is to

0:35:09.600 --> 0:35:12.160
<v Speaker 1>bet on Seattle at least covering the point. Maybe not

0:35:12.200 --> 0:35:15.000
<v Speaker 1>winning outright, but covering the points. But we love to

0:35:15.040 --> 0:35:17.360
<v Speaker 1>hear from you. Drop your comments below. What are your

0:35:17.360 --> 0:35:21.520
<v Speaker 1>early line values for Week four in the NFL. Don't

0:35:21.520 --> 0:35:25.439
<v Speaker 1>forget to download the Betting Pros app today. Don't forget

0:35:25.440 --> 0:35:28.640
<v Speaker 1>to subscribe to the channel too, Drop your comments, ring

0:35:28.719 --> 0:35:32.359
<v Speaker 1>the bell for notifications till it goes ding, and go

0:35:32.400 --> 0:35:35.360
<v Speaker 1>do Betting Pros dot com Slash NFL contest as well

0:35:35.640 --> 0:35:37.640
<v Speaker 1>to join us for all the fun we've got going

0:35:37.640 --> 0:35:39.319
<v Speaker 1>on in that Nick Chubb, the helmet's not gonna give

0:35:39.320 --> 0:35:43.160
<v Speaker 1>away itself again. Betting Pros dot com Slash Contest. That's

0:35:43.200 --> 0:35:45.760
<v Speaker 1>the place to go to sign up to win that today.

0:35:45.800 --> 0:35:47.480
<v Speaker 1>That'll do it for us, but the story of the

0:35:47.480 --> 0:35:50.200
<v Speaker 1>game goes on. For Andrew Ericsson, I'm Joey p. We'll

0:35:50.200 --> 0:35:51.360
<v Speaker 1>see you next time. Kids.

0:35:51.800 --> 0:35:54.440
<v Speaker 2>Thanks for listening to the Betting Pros podcast. If you

0:35:54.480 --> 0:35:56.879
<v Speaker 2>love the show, the best freeway to support us.

0:35:56.800 --> 0:35:59.640
<v Speaker 1>Is by leaving a positive review on Apple Podcasts or

0:35:59.680 --> 0:36:03.040
<v Speaker 1>spot Follow us on x and TikTok at Betting Pros

0:36:03.120 --> 0:36:06.600
<v Speaker 1>and Instagram at Betting Pros NFL. Also subscribe to our

0:36:06.600 --> 0:36:09.480
<v Speaker 1>YouTube channel at YouTube dot com slash Betting Pros